244 40 122MB
English Pages [190] Year 1987
Roman Military· Equipment .· The Accoutrements of War
Proceedings of the Third Roman Military Equipment Research Seminar
edited by
M. Dawson
BAR International Series 336 1987
B.A.R.
5, Centremead, Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 ODQ, England.
GENERAL EDITORS A.R. Hands, B.Sc., M.A., D.Phil. D.R. Walker, M.A.
BAR-S336, 1987 : ' Roman Military Equipment' © The Individual Authors, 1987 The authors’ moral rights under the 1988 UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act are hereby expressly asserted. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be copied, reproduced, stored, sold, distributed, scanned, saved in any form of digital format or transmitted in any form digitally, without the written permission of the Publisher. ISBN 9780860544302 paperback ISBN 9781407346083 e-book DOI https://doi.org/10.30861/9780860544302 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available at www.barpublishing.com
C ONTENTS P age L ist of I llustrations L ist of Contributors
i x
P reface
I ntroduction M .
Dawson
1
Connolly
7
The Artefacts The Roman saddle P . O n making a Roman cornu P .
Barton
2 8
Wickenden
3 8
Appendix N . T he Roman military tunic N . D ura-Europos and the introduction of the
Fuentes
4 1
' Mongolian
r elease' S .
James
7 7
Lloyd-Morgan
8 5
P rofessor Robert Newstead and f inds of Roman m ilitary metalwork from Chester G .
The Theory The Wellingborough and Nijmegen marches D .
Atkinson & L .
Morgan
9 9
B ishop
1 09
' The evolution of certain f eatures' M .C.
R oman military equipment on third century tombstones J .C.
i ii
Coulston
1 41
P age A note on Roman military equipment f rom Romania A . E vidence
D iaconescu & C .
Opreanu
1 57
Sheldon
1 67
Morgan
1 75
for the Roman army in Southwark M .
Hammerson & H .
The drawn sword L .
I ndex
1 76
iv
L IST O F
I LLUSTRATIONS P age
CONNOLLY At
Durham ,
the
s addle
mount despite the P l.II
The
s addle's
proved remarkably easy to
l ack of stirrups
horns
provided
a
9 high
degree
of
s tability f or the rider The
s addle
1 0
horns hold the r ider f irmly in place -
even in potentially d isastrous s ituations
common in
combat
1 3
P l.IV
The
horns
on
t he
s addle
F ig.1
The s addle f ragments
a llowed
the
r ider
a
r emarkable d egree of mobility and balance
1 4
f rom Valkenburg and Vechten in
the Netherlands F ig.2
S implified
2 0
reconstruction
of
the main Valkenburg
p iece
2 1
F ig.3
D r Groenman-van Waateringe's
F ig.4
The rear,
F ig.5
The f ront pommel
reconstruction of
the
s addle components
F ig.6a The
stiffeners
f rom Rottweil
stiffeners from Rottweil
2 4
saddle tree
2 4
The suggested method of stitching the pommel to the
f acing
f ront pommels of the main Valkenburg l eather
F ig.8a & b S ide
and
2 3 2 4
front o f the saddle tree
F ig.6b The back of the F ig.7
2 2
L-shaped pommel
threequarter
f ront
v iew
o f
2 5
the
Valkenburg saddle F ig.8c,
d & e The s itting position f rom the s ide,
back and
top F ig.8f A f allen horse S t. Remi F ig.8g A
detail
Mainz
shown on
t he
Julii
monument
f rom
in southern France f rom
the tombstone of Gaius Romanius at
in Germany
F ig.9a-e Front,
2 6
underneath,
back
and
t op
v iews
o f
t he
r econstructed saddle without g irth strap F ig.9e A
possible
reconstruction
of
the
g irth
s trap
a ttached t o f laps which are stitched to the wood of t he tree
2 7
BARTON P 1.1
The
cornu
under
College of Music, F ig.1
The
P ompeii
t rials
a t
t he
R oyal
M ilitary
Kneller Hall
cornu,
w ith
t he
2 8 r econstructions of
Mahillon and Alexander
3 0
F ig.2
D etails of Kakaki bell
F ig.3
D etails of construction of bell
F ig.4
D etails of construction of bell
3 2
F ig.5
D etails o f handle socket
3 3
F ig.6
Mouthpiece
3 4
F ig.7
The harmonic series which represent the range
Page F ig.8
of the reconstructed cornu
3 4
The completed cornu
3 5
WICKENDEN F ig.9
Trumpet mouthpieces Lydney Park,
f rom
C olchester,
Verulamium ,
and Wickford
3 8
FUENTES F ig.1
V ine dresser
F ig.2
D efaced olive harvester,
F ig.3
P artly defaced s lave,
F ig.4
Tunic-clad
f rom C ordova
f rom Waltersdorf,
4 2 E .
Austria
soldier in a religious procession ,
f rom
Trajan's Column
4 3
F ig.5
Rower,
presumably a soldier,
f rom Trajan's Column
F ig.6
Bare-shouldered soldier cutting down a
t ree,
f rom
Trajan's Column F ig.7
Soldier
procession , F ig.8
Soldier
4 5
c arrying
a
p latform
in
a
t riumphal
f rom the Belvedere s arcophagus
c arrying
a
box
of
t ablets,
f rom
t he
Chatsworth relief
4 7
P 1.1
The s econd reconstruction of a tunic when unbelted
P 1.2
R ear view of the belted tunic
P 1.3
S ide v iew of the belted tunic
7 2
P 1.4
Front view of the belted tunic
P 1.5
A
P 1.6
Two
s tance
in
the
7 3
manner of the Chatsworth relief
( Fig.8) ( modern)
f ibulae s ecure the two panels
of
t he
tunic
7 4
P 1.7
The unknotted tunic with a bared shoulder
P 1.8
The unknotted tunic with a bared shoulder
7 5
JAMES F ig.1
The Dura thumbring,
Yale no.
F ig.2
The Dura thumbring
F ig.3
D etails of shaftments
F ig.4
S haftments
1929.475A
f rom Tower 1 9
7 9
f rom Tower 19 and f rom " L7-W",
the wall
in the vicinity of the tower
8 0
LLOYD-MORGAN P l.I
P rof. F ield,
Robert Newstead Chester,
April
P l.II. A Iron scale armour I I.B I ron
hob
f ittings,
e xcavating
copper
Deanery F ield,
F ield,
D eanery
a lloy
Chester 1 914
belt plaques and
1 928
P l.III. A Copper a lloy buckles and I II.B Copper
t he
8 6
f rom Hunter S treet,
nails,
D eanery F ield,
i n
1935
pelta
8 8 s haped
p laques,
1928
a lloy,
l ead,
and i ron pendants,
1928
Deanery 9 0
vi
P age P l.IV. A L ead
' luggage
I V.B Copper
label',
a lloy
D eanery F ield,
' luggage
l abel',
1 928
D eanery
F ield,
1 922-3 IV.0 I ron caltrop ,
Deanery F ield,
P l. V. A Chester Pageant 2 0.
1 910:
1 928
9 4
Agricola with soldiers of the
l egion
V .B Chester Pageant 1910:
' Soldiers playing dice'
9 5
ATKINSON & MORGAN P ls.I
& I I The N ijmegen march - these photographs show the method
of s uspension of helmet and other equipment
on the march - this i s to be method
contrasted
with
the
i llustrated on Trajan's Column
1 06
B ISHOP F ig.1
The
' mental
t emplate'
and
the
spread
o f ideas
amongst military craftsmen
1 12
F ig.2
Types
1 15
F ig.3
B elt plates
F ig.4
of phalera fastening
' St.Andrew 's
Cross'
belt plates
1 17
F ig.5
P endants
F ig.6
The relationship between l unula and trifid pendants
F ig.7
' Lorica s egmentata'
l obate hinges
F ig.8
' Lorica s egmentata'
hinged strap f ittings
F ig.9
' Lorica s egmentata' hinged buckle
F ig.10 F ig.11
1 18
' Lorica s egmentata'
1 21
f ittings
tie hocks
1 22
The distribution of embossed belt plates
F ig.12 A l arge F ig.13 The
' bird-headed'
d istribution
t ombstones and
1 19
1 23
pendant f rom Cirencester
o f
f igured
' bird-headed'
Thracian
c avalry
pendants in Britain
1 24
COULSTON P 1.1
Tombstone
of
an unknown soldier found in I stanbul
Archaeological Museum P 1.2
Tombstone
of
1 42
Aprilius
S picatus
f rom
a n umerus
D ivitensium P 1.3
1 42
Tombstone
of
Aurelius
S urus
f rom
t he
l egio
I
Adiutrix P 1.4
1 44
Tombstone of an unknown soldier found at
t he
s ite
of Herakleia Pontica
1 44
D IACONESCU & OPREANU F ig.1
Cavalry parade horse armour f rom t he
F ig.2
C avalry parade horse armour f ragment f rom I nläceni
F ig.3
D ecorative
plate
d epicting Mars;
f rom
c avalry
f rom Straubing
fort of Gilau parade
1 59
armour 1 60
F ig.4
B ronze s tuds
1 62
F ig.5
B utton and
1 65
F ig.6
M ilitary strap ends
loop f asteners
1 68
v ii
P age HAMMERSON & SHELDON P 1.1
Auxiliary
harness
pendant
f rom
1 5-23
S outhwark
harness
p endant
f rom
1 5-23
S outhwark
Arcadia
buildings
S treet P 1.2
Auxiliary S treet
1 69
P 1.3
Lorica s egmentata
buckle
f rom
F ig.1
C arnelian gemstone with l egionary motif f rom 1 -7 S t
F ig.2
Location plan of military f inds f rom S outhwark
( X-ray) Thomas'
1 70 Street
1 70
v iii
1 73
L IST O F CONTRIBUTORS
P .
Barton
1 5
D enbigh
T errace,
London,
Wll
2QJ,
England M .C.
B ishop
D ept.
of Archaeology,
Newcastle upon Tyne, P .
Connolly
1 5
C hurch Gate,
2RA , J .C.
Coulston
NE1
A .
Dawson
Diaconescu
University ,
7RU,
Spalding,
England
Lincs.,
PEll
England
D ept.
of Archaeology,
Newcastle upon Tyne, M .
The
The NE1
University ,
7RU,
England
Archaeology
S ection ,
P lanning
D ept.,
County Hall,
Bedford,
MK42 9 AP,
England
Muzeul de I stoire S tr
Emil
a l
I sac,
Transylvanie,
C luj-Napoca,
4
3 400,
Romania J .
Eagle
2 2
Ember
S urrey, N .
Fuentes
7
Farm
Way ,
KT4 OBL,
C oalecroft
East
Molsely ,
England
R oad,
London ,
SW15 6LW,
England G .
L .
Lloyd-Morgan
Morgan
Grosvenor Museum ,
2 7 Grosvenor
Chester,
England
3 4
CH1
M idfield
Northants., C .
Opreanu
2DD ,
Court, NN3
S tr
Emil
Thorpelands No.2,
1XP,
Muzeul de I stoire
England
a l
I sac,
S treet,
T ransylvanie,
C luj-Napoca,
4
3 400,
Romania H .
Sheldon
D ept. The
of
London , N .
Wickenden
Greater
Museum
EC2Y 5 HN ,
Chelmsford Writtle E ssex,
of
Archaeology , London
Road,
Wall,
England
Archaeological
England
i x
London London,
C helmsford,
Trust, CM1
1 3 BL,
P REFACE
The Roman Military Equipment R esearch Seminar was 1 983 at a t ime when specialists f elt
a n
increasing
f ormed in n eed,
not
only to discuss the relevance and u sefulness of their d iscipline with
other
colleagues,
but to place their
studies
in the wider
context of Roman archaeology and generally to increase awareness i n the potential of military studies. As a measure of which
was
f irst
enthusiasm
held
and
s uccess,
t he
conference
i n Sheffield was quickly publishedl
and
f ollowed by a s econd conference which was subsequently published a s a full BAR volume. by
t he
Dept.
By the third conference,
2
contributions were being received from material
individuals
f rom s ites as exotic a s Dura-Europos
in Northern Transylvania, The
s eminar
presented
to
d iscussion ,
hosted
i n
1 985
o f Archaeology at the University of Nottingham ,
took
t he often
a s well a s
working
on
in Syria and G ilau
f rom nearer home.
a f amiliar form with a s eries of papers
participants hectic,
f ollowed
notes
by
a
period
of
f rom which in many cases have
been included in the submission of papers for publication. I n addition to the d isplay
presented
and a photograph and
t ext
d isplay
Greater London Archaeology I
without their
mounted
work
the
( L.
a lso
by
t he
D ept.
f or
a of
publication ,
Allason-Jones and P eter Hazell),
s eminar
would
have
been
for
s tillborn.
welcome was the presence of the E rmine Street Guard and
their excellent repertoire of replicas. t oo
was
( Southwark and Lambeth).
- those who have produced papers
t hose who have not
Equally
there
s hould l ike to take this opportunity to thank all of the
contributors and
papers,
of replica armour by members of the Ermine Street Guard
t o the Dept.
Further
I
am
i ndebted
of Archaeology at the University of Nottingham
for hosting the conference and help in the arrangements. F inally special thanks must go to M .C. and
encouragement
B ishop f or his
help
t hroughout a s well a s his preparation of the
typed text during the autumn of 1 986. The Roman military equipment s eminars are an that
a ttract
annual
e vent
both s cholars and amateurs and f urther details of
f uture meetings may be obtained f rom the editor.
NOTES 1 .
M .C.
Bishop
( ed.),
Roman Military Equipment.
P roceedings of a
S eminar
Held
C lassical
the
Archaeology
March 1 983 B ishop
i n
( Sheffield
D epartment at
of
Ancient
H istory
the University of S heffield,
1 983).
Copies
a vailable
f rom
( see L ist of Contributors f or contact address),
and 2 1st M .C.
price
£ 0.90. 2 .
M .C.
B ishop
M ilitary
( ed.),
The P roduction and D istribution
Equipment.
of
R oman
P roceedings of the S econd R oman M ilitary
Equipment Research S eminar,
BAR
( Oxford 1 985)
x i
I nternational
S eries
2 75,
I NTRODUCTION M .
T he
Dawson
R oman m ilitary equipment s eminar of 1 985 was g enerally
i ntended t o explore the i ssues r aised by c urrent t he
d iversity
o f
a rtefacts
a ccoutrements o f war. s imply
c oncern
c ontrary , o f
i tself
w ith
i ts
c overed
s pectrum ,
t raining ,
a ssemblage
m attocks,
f rom
c hisels,
d ividers,
s upply,
S aalburg,
o f
t he
a rtefacts
we
have
f ew
dolabrae ,
s aws,
t urf
c utters,
weighing
i s
hammers, and
e quipment,
and so on.
army's
r equirements,
s urvives,
however ,
only a s mall
and
of
t hese
a d isproportionate number of c ertain types;
a nd of these d isproportionate survivals, a
building
F eldburg and Z ugmantel
b its,
vehicle mounts,
a rray of
s urvivals
on the
majority
t ransport,
comprising axes,
whilst other f orts 2 have yielded
t he
t he
n ot
and communication .'
f iles,
m edical instruments,
p roportion
d id
uniform and weaponry;
including areas s uch as
p articularly i lluminating,
b ut
o ther ,
their equipment r equirements c overed a much wider
( and maintenance), T he
i nto
by t he t erm the
l ike any
a lthough s uch a spects c urrently r eceive
a ttention ,
Of
l oosely
The Roman a rmy ,
r esearch
a spects.
r esearch
has
c overed
T he r easons f or this a re s traightforward,
r elating
t o
i nterest ,
not to mention the intrinsic attractiveness of c ertain
f orms.
I n
every
o rganised, r ight
-
t radition ,
s urvival,
s ense,
t hese
f ashion ,
r esearch
in s ome small measure,
and
i ndividual
s eminars
t o begin to
g et
have t he
providing a platform f or opinion and research.
t his will be a s low business,
b een
balance C learly
a s t he study of m ilitary artefacts
i s only a recent phenomenon and the f inancial s upport f or i t
i s
s lim indeed. D espite
t he
o rigins
of
i nterest
i n
s tretching back t o the R enaissance and before, a rchaeological
s ituation
t he
R oman
the
c ontemporary
i s one of confusion .
There i s g eneral
a greement a s t o t he date and occurrence of uniform t he
f irst
a nd s econd centuries AD ,
R obinson ,
3
O ldenstein ,
4
Works
l ike
t hose
i dentification ,
a nd
t heir
a
d iversity
s pades,
f or s uch
hoes,
e quipment,
1 1
of
o missions.
a s well a s A s
r egards
i n s ome cases t he chronological occurrence
o f t he r emaining a ccoutrements of war, c atalogues
of
, and B ishop 5 go a l ong way to c larifying
knowledge of t he uniform of t he imperial armies,
h ighlighting the d eficiencies by
a nd
f ittings
a lthough not n ecessarily to
which t ype of unit t hey may have belonged. o ur
a rmy ,
o f
works
o ther d iaspora
and mattocks,
ballistae,
1 2
8
a s
Manning's
c atalogue 6
have derived typologies and l ate
R oman
c auldron chains,
lothes and c
1
BM
9
belt
f ittings,
nails,
1°
f asteners. 1 3
7
medical
I ntegral
t o
e xamination a rtwork,
s uch
of
a rchaeological
s urviving
which
s erve
e ither
i dentifications of individual, l ess
i ntegral
has
and
o ther
d ecorative
t o
o r
r einforce
i dentify
often unassociated,
been
t he
artefacts.
No
t o the process of r ecognition of l oose i tems has
been t he analysis and r e-analysis of t hose
works
s culptural
l arger
a ssemblages,
l ike
f rom Newstead and Corbridge. T hus
we
have
t he initial problem of artefact study - the
s econd l evel of development observed over the l ast c entury ,
that
of t he typology,
t his
v olume).
has
C learly
b een
t he
prehistoric study,
l argely
typology
s idestepped
has
( Bishop ,
i ts place particularly in
when date r anges are wide and tools,
pottery,
a nd building types may indeed have developed a long stylistically d iagnostic t he
l ines.
t ypology
I n Roman military
i s
t he
end
d evelopmental s equence,
e quipment
product
a nd
i s
t he corpus,
d istribution ,
s eries.
however,
be
with the vagaries of f ashion ,
and military n ecessity r eflected in i ts v alue
t erms,
s hould
O f
s een a s a e conomics, much
m ore
which s eeks t o d isplay not only s patial
1 4
but to relate artefacts t o each
o ther
a nd
t heir
point of d iscovery. T he
l imitations of the corpus are t hose imposed l argely by
t he archaeological past - interest in m ilitary f irst
a t the turn of the century,
s ites s uch as Newstead 15
and through
l ike
Jacobi,
von
D omaszewski,
a rtefacts thus d iscovered, t he
l ate 1950s,
p recisely
d iscovered,
work
o f
i ndividuals
R itterling.
Most
G iven
t his
i nstance
t he
brooches
artefacts took a s econd t echniques
p lace.
The
s eventies,
t hat occurred in the 1 950s and
s aw
t he emphasis c hange.
s till y ielded c lear s tructural s equences. p ut f orward the corpus, ( often
c ollections
f rom
r evolution
t o
d istributions;
d ated) i dentify
i n
' 60s,
by
t he
More and more s ites
were examined t hat could not be coin d ated in every t o
r arely
only the occasional
- and with the quantity of coins and inscriptions
a rchaeological
w ith c lear
o f the
their c ontexts
l egacy,
with t he n eed f or f ast efficient rescue d igs dominating e arly
a rose
and for the s ucceeeding decades until
t ypology was d eveloped - l ike f or Camulodunum 16
t he
and
were u sed i llustratively ,
i dentified.
a rtefacts
f rom t he excavations of major
a spect
b ut
I t was possible t hence
combining information f rom artefacts c ontexts, a
w ith
d evelopment
t hose o f
f rom
t ypes
e arlier
and
o ther
and to begin to u se artefacts in a way that coins
had been u sed previously. A lthough the progression ,
d evelopment
t here
i s
n ow
c ontinues on the recognition c ontinuing
work
of
t he
s omething of
c orpus
was
o f
i mpasse
a rtefacts,
an but
on the i st and 2 nd centuries AD ,
c enturies are l argely i gnored.
Worse s till,
2
i n 1 7
a
n atural - work
s pite
of
t he 3 rd-5th
despite t hree papers
i n 1 986,
t here i s
c onstitutes
s till
no
a greement
a s
t o
what
l egionary or auxiliary uniform 18 . I n 1 982,
o bserved t hat there was then a d isparity between t ypes
p recisely
t he
Holder 19 t wo
m ain
o f evidence - documentary/epigraphic and archaeological -
a nd t his r emains t he s ame today. T he way forward i s f ar f rom clear in the l iterature p roduction
o f
C olchester 21 e asier,
c atalogues
l ike
t hose
makes a ccess t o l arge bodies
b ut
s till
t he
b eginning
a ny
analysis.
g eographical l imitations, i n
t he
Near
E ast,
t he
o f
a rtefacts
a
l ot
r esearcher must spend much time s imply
s earching f or and e xamining the context of individual b efore
-
f rom S outh S hields 2 ° and
Even
t his
f or in many of the
and
North
Africa,
a rtefacts
p rocess B alkan t he
has
i ts
c ountries,
a rchaeological
t echniques c urrent do not a llow f or the publication of artefacts which are i dentified with their precise point here i s to emphasise, t he
i dentification
p rerequisite,
o f
o r
The
that not only i s
a rtefacts
an
e ssential
but so too i s the detailed understanding of their
r elative
o ccurrence,
t hrough d iscussion ,
d iscovered
c ontext and the possible c lose
l ocation or context.
r eason
o r
f or
a bsolute
d eposition.
L ikewise,
a
d ate r ange for t he artefact's
derived f rom other s imilar deposits and r igorous u se
o f excavation
d ata ,
i s
e ssential
before
any
d iscussion
of
d evelopment or association may be attempted. S o if i t proves possible to r elate r egiments to their bases i n
t he
f irst two c enturies AD f rom inscriptions or documentary
e vidence,
i t follows that - g iven a g reater insight into the u se
o r f unction of d iscarded, f orward i s c lear. f unction ,
d ate
l ost ,
or destroyed artefacts - the way
O n the one hand, r ange,
and
the continued s earch for
d evelopment
on the other
work!
s ay to u se artefact a ssemblages t o identify
T hat
i s
t o
g arrison points
t he
D iocletian),
r eforms
f unctions. b egun
-
of
I n some areas, B ishop ,
this
t his volume,
s uch
a s
t his
s eries
w ill
a rchaeologists
t o
f unctions,
t ype
o f
a nalysis
a fter
building
has
a lready
2 2
e ditor
help r esearchers,
t o t hink
e xpansively
t hat
s eminars
in what i s often a nd
f or
o ther
r ealise how u seful the study of the minutiae
NOTES P IETSCH ,
e ven
and t he attempted correlation of
o f R oman m ilitary e quipment can be.
1 .
e quipment
( of particular interest
i t i s t he p ious hope of this
c onsidered a minor f ield ,
m ilitary
f ort
a rrows with the cohors I Hamiorum . H ence,
make
t he
a rtefacts through
i ndividual analysis; t roops movements,
t o
o f
1983.
3
2 .
DAWSON ,
1985,
1 40-1.
3 .
ROBINSON ,
4 .
OLDENSTEIN ,
5 .
B ISHOP,
6 .
MANNING,
7 .
HAWKES & DUNNING,
8 .
MANNING ,
1969.
9 .
MANNING ,
1 983.
1975. 1976.
f orthcoming. 1 985.
1 0.
CLEERE ,
1 958;
1 1.
KUNZL,
1 2.
BAATZ & GUDEA,
1 3.
W ILD ,
1 4.
B ISHOP,
1 5.
CURLE,
1 6.
HAWKES & HULL ,
1 7.
WEBSTER ,
1 8.
MAXFIELD ,
1 9.
HOLDER ,
1 961;
MANNING ,
BULLINGER ,
1 969.
1 976 .
1983. 1 974.
1970. f orthcoming;
OLDENSTEIN ,
1 976 .
1 911. 1 947.
1985. 1986;
B ISHOP,
1 986.
1982.
2 0. ALLASON-JONES & MIKET, 2 1.
CRUMMY,
1 983.
2 2.
DAVIES ,
1977.
1 984.
B IBLIOGRAPHY ALLASON-JONES & M IKET 1 984: C atalogue
of
S mall
L .
A llason -,J ones
F inds
f rom
&
R .
M iket,
The
S outh Shields R oman F ort,
( Newcastle upon Tyne 1984) BAATZ & GUDEA 1974:
D .
Baatz & N .
4
Gudea,
' Teile
s pätrömischer
Ballisten
aus
Gornea
S aalburg-Jahrbuch XXXI, B ISHOP
1 986:
M .C.
equipment
B ishop,
within
und
1 974,
O rsova
' The
d istribution
Roman f orts of the
Studien z u den M ilitärgrenzen Roms Limeskongreß Aalen 1983 Vorträge, B ISHOP f orthcoming: army
i n
the
P roceedings
Bishop , c entury
I II.
1 969:
H .
the
Fourth
H .
B ullinger,
C leere,
A . D.'
I nternationaler
in J .C.
Roman
7 17-23
Coulston
M ilitary
( ed.),
Equipment
' Spätäntike Gürtelbeschläge'
' Roman domestic
I sle
of
Wight,
Institute of Archaeology I , 1 983:
1 3.
in
( Oxford forthcoming)
by the Brading,
CRUMMY
military
( Stuttgart 1986),
D issertationes Archaeologicae Gandensis CLEERE 1958:
of
f irst century A . D.'
' Cavalry equipment of the Roman
f irst of
Conference, BULLINGER
M .C.
( Rumänien)',
5 0-72
N .
C rummy,
1 2,
( Bruges
i ronwork, v illa',
1958,
a s i llustrated
Bulletin
of
the
5 5-74
The Roman Small F inds
in Colchester 1 971-9,
in
1969)
f rom Excavations
Colchester Archaeological
R eports
2 ,
A Roman Frontier P ost and its P eople.
The
( Colchester 1983) CURLE
1 911:
J .
Curie,
Fort of Newstead in the Parish of Melrose, DAVIES 1977:
J .L.
s agittarii', DAWSON
1 985:
' Arrowheads
B ritannia VIII,
M .
excavations CV ,
D avies,
D awson in J . 1 968-1983',
D inorben
and
the
2 57-70 Dool & H .
Derbyshire
Wheeler ,
' Roman Derby:
Archaeological
Journal
1985
HAWKES & DUNNING 1 961: s ettlers
i n
1 961,
HAWKES & HULL 1 947: F irst
R eport
R eport
of
S .C.
B ritain ,
Archaeology V ,
1 982:
P .A .
& G .C.
f ourth
t o
Dunning,
' Soldiers and
f ifth century',
Medieval
1 -70
C . F.C. on
t he
Hawkes
the
Hawkes
&
M .R.
Hull,
Camulodunum.
Excavations at Colchester 1 930-1939,
R esearch
Antiquaries of London 1 4, HOLDER
f rom
( Glasgow 1911)
Holder,
Committee
of
t he
S ociety
of
( London 1947) The
Roman Army in B ritain,
( London
1 982) KUNZL
1 983:
E .
Kunzl,
Medizinische
S epulkralfunden der römischer Kaiserzeit, MANNING
1 969:
W .H.
Manning,
' Mattocks,
5
hoes,
Instrumente
aus
( Bonn 1983) spades
and related
tools
in Roman B ritain'
in A .
Gailey & A .
Spade in Northern and Atlantic Europe, MANNING 1976:
W .H.
Manning,
Fenton
MANNING 1985: Tools,
The
1 8-29
Catalogue of Romano-British I ronwork
in the Museum of Antiquities Newcastle upon Tyne, upon Tyne
( eds.),
( Belfast 1969),
( Newcastle
1976) W .H.
Manning,
F ittings
Catalogue of the Romano-British I ron
and Weapons
in the B ritish
Museum ,
( London
1985) MAXFIELD
1 986:
garrisons', OLDENSTEIN
V .
Maxfield ,
Britannia XVII,
1 976:
J .
P IETSCH 1983:
5 7, M .
Saalburg, 1 983,
1986,
O ldenstein ,
Auxiliareinheiten ', Kommission
' Pre-Flavian
and
t heir
5 9-72
' Zur
Bericht
f orts
Ausrüstung
der
römischer
Römisch-Germanischen
49-284 P ietsdh,
' Die
F eldberg und
römischen
Z ugmantel',
E isenwerkzeuge
v on
S aalburg-Jahrbuch XXXIX,
5 -132
ROBINSON 1975:
H .
Russell Robinson ,
The Armour of Imperial Rome,
( London 1975) WEBSTER 1985:
G .
Webster ,
The Roman Imperial Army,
ed.3,
( London
1985) WILD 1970:
J .P.
provinces',
Wild,
' Button and loop f asteners
B ritannia I ,
1970,
6
2 71-337
i n
t he
R oman
T HE ROMAN S ADDLE P eter Connolly
I n 1 967 D r f inds
f rom
W .
G roenman-van Waateringe published the l eather
Valkenburg
and
Vechten
t he Netherlands which
f rom
r estoration these p ieces
f ormed the s addle c overing.
had
a l arge main p iece
R oman
i n
i ncluded s everal pieces
s addles
( Fig.1).
and
f our
o utside
p ommels which were s titched t o the main piece. t riangular in shape with a rounded top. Type
her
( Fig.1,a) which covered t he s eat and the
i nside of the four pommels
t ypes:
I n
Each s addle
f acings
o f
t he
These are roughly
They appear to be of two
1 ( Fig.1,e) has one rounded and one pointed corner
a t t he base and type 2 ( Fig.1,d) has both corners pointed. These a re
s hown
i n
Waateringe's
a
s chematic
analysis
r econstruction
o f
d rawing
f orm
i n
t hese
of
F ig.2.
p ieces
t he
was
a ssembled
D r
G roenman-van
a ccompanied by a
p ieces
o f
l eather
( Fig.3). T his
was a t remendous s tep f orward in our understanding of
t he R oman s addle but D r Groenman-van Waateringe did not h ow
i t
f itted
t o
t he
wooden
f rame
e xistence of so-called pommel stiffeners n ail holes a long the edges a t
l east
must
have
r econstructed f orm ,
t hat she envisaged. m ade
o f
b ronze
l ed
m any
The with
( Figs.4 & 5 ) proves that some s addles
had
a wooden f rame or tree but,
in their
there s eemed to be no r ealistic way t hat the
Valkenburg/Vechten pieces could be f itted to such a has
e xplain
p eople to s uggest t hat it was
t ree.
T his
j ust a l oose cover
f or a s addle.
I I I n 1 984 whilst preparing a s mall book on a Roman cavalryman m y attention was d rawn to t he s addle f ighting
was t hat there was c ombined
b ecause
c apabilities of t he horseman. w ith
t he
n o
t rue
l ack
s addle
a t
o f stirrups,
c apability of the c avalryman. n ot
t rue;
d ictates
t he
t his
t ime
and
t his,
s eriously r estricted the
The s culptural evidence f rom f irst
c entury t ombstones s uggested t hat t he w as
i t
The consensus of opinion
f irst of these
s tatements
one way t o t est t his was to build a r eplica of a
R oman s addle and t o r ide i t. I t i s e ssential
t hat a ny r igid s addle should be made to f it
a particular build of horse.
A f ourteen hand pony was
t he
horse
average
s ize
of
t he
7
s elected,
s keletons found at the Roman
c avalry f ort at Krefeld-Gellep in Germany , t o
f it it. b e
s addle
m ade
F irst the contours f rom the withers to the c entre of
t he back were reproduced as a f orma on c ould
and t he
c onstructed.
which
t he
s addle
t ree
The t ree of l aminated s trips of wood was
g lued together in the same way a s the D ura
E uropos
a nd
F ayyum
s hields and reinforced with an i ron backet a cross the withers. T he
r econstruction
of
t he
back of the t ree presented no
p roblems a s a pair of L-shaped pommel s tiffeners f rom n ow
i n the museum at Aalen in Germany
( Fig.4)
R ottweil,
gave not only the
s hape of the pommels but a lso the exact d imensions of o f
t he
s addle.
l eather b ack
Fortunately
( Figs.la & 2 )
t o
t he
b ack
t he pommels f itted the Valkenburg
a lmost perfectly.
The
d istance
f rom
t he
f ront pommels could easily be calculated a s could
t he d istance between the f ront pommels, pommel
t he
but although
s tiffeners had a lso been f ound at Rottweil
two
f ront
( Fig.5)
these
m erely f it over the pommels themselves and provide no c lue a s to t he shape of the f ront of the s addle. Any s addle has to f it a cross the withers of the t herefore
must
a bout 6 0'. Assuming that the pommels stuck out at t o
t he
a bout
t ree 3 0°
s traightforward evidence
t he
horizontal
and
( Fig.6a).
T his
obvious r econstruction.
a nd
would
be unwarranted.
r ight
a ngles
t his
was
t he
most
To put them at any i nterpretation t he
understanding
f ront pommels.
point the reconstruction came to a halt a s i t was
impossible to determine the depth of the s ides of the
t ree.
had
t he
b een
a ssumed
Valkenburg l eather
t hat
a s
t hem .
H owever
t he
i f
t he
which were a lso
t hing
pommels
o n
would
t urn
s maller ,
went
l ower part of t he pommel f acing
to the dart and t he
m ain
s titched
t ogether ,
under f orming a s ort of bag.
w ith
( D-E on
l eading edge of the s ide panel
t o the bottom of the pommel were whole
f ront
I t
( Fig.la) were smaller than the back ones t hat
t he Type 1 pommel f acings, F ig.7a)
o f
As will be s een l ater
t his proved to be of paramount importance in o f the f unction of the At
and
t hey would have projected s ideways at an angle of
t o
o ther angle would have required an arbitrary t he
horse
r ise to a peak at the f ront f orming an angle of
t hen
( B-C) t he
Not only
would t his solve the problem of how the l eather f itted over
t he
t ree but it would a lso determine the depth of the s ide which had t o
b e
( B-C).
l imited
by
t he maximum extent o f the f olded s ide panel
This s eemed to be confirmed by
pommels
t hemselves
had
t he
s titching,
P l.I:
T his
was
d one
A t Durham , d espite the
by
t he
b een stitched f rom the inside with the
l eather turning inwards to f orm an invisible top S ).
f or
s eam
( Fig.7a ,
p re-punching the holes with an awl and
the s addle proved remarkably l ack of stirrups.
8
e asy
t o
mount
P i. I
•
1 0
s ewing
f rom both f ront and back u sing two p ig hairs a ttached to
e ither end of a piece of f itted
o ver
t he
t hread.
p ommels
Once
t he
l eather
had
a ll f urther stitching had to be done
f rom t he outside a ccounting f or t he d ifferent coarser o n t he dart and s ides I t
r equired
b een
s titching
( Fig.la).
a n enormous amount of trial and e rror to make
t he f rame t he r ight s hape to f it inside the l eather a s it had to b e s titched up f irst but, r estitching
the
d isintegrated, was
after
s econd
t earing
s o
many
t he
f irst
t imes
c over
t hat
t he
the wood and l eather f inally f itted.
r eminiscent
o f
t he
l ozenge
and e dges
t he
r esult
s haped s addles s hown on many
f irst c entury tombstones s uch a s that of Gaius Romanius at Mainz ( Fig.8a)
and the one shown on the Julii monument at S t.
s outhern F rance The
c rescent
s haped
holes
( Fig.2,X ,X ,X,X)
V alkenburg l eather and a lso on other t he
l ower
edge
o f
t he
t ree.
f ragments
o n
t he main
c oincided
w ith
These cords c an be s een
o n many R oman s culptures and had a dual purpose; t he
i n
These are c learly f or attaching
c ords or t hongs to t he edge of the t ree. t o
Remi
( Fig.8f).
to t ie
b aggage
f ront and back of the saddle and to s uspend decorations
when on parade. At f irst I thought they might be
f or
a ttaching
t he g irth s trap but they would be f ar too f limsy. The
a rchaeological
r emains
a ttachment of the g irth strap.
t ell
u s
n othing
about
t he
One must a ssume that the tree was
n ot totally covered by the l eather and that the g irth strap a ttached
d irectly
t o
u se of saddle f laps. m onument
( Fig. 8 f).
c rupper
a nd
f laps
s eem
This may have been done by the t o
be
s hown
o n
t he
J ulii
I f this i s the case then the g irth strap,
the
t he breast plate may a ll have been attached t o the
( see F ig.9e). Although the
u seful f rom
t he t ree. T hese
was
b ronze
pommel
s tiffeners
i n making t he reconstruction , obvious.
I t
i s
u ncertain
o utside the l eather covering. S cotland
have
names
o n
t he
p roved
v ery
whether t hey f itted inside or e xamples
f rom
N ewstead
i n
s cratched on them which suggest that they
m ust have been on t he outside l eather
T he
had
their exact f unction i s f ar
o utside
b ut
t hey
a lso
have
t races
which suggest the opposite.
a rgue that the names were put there by the bronzesmith
o f
One c ould t o
t ell
t he s addler which s addle they were f or or on the other hand that t he
t races of l eather were f rom a s addle cover.
S ince some have
n ail holes and s ome s titching holes i t i s d ifficult t hat
t hey
had
a ny s trengthening f unction .
T he saddle 's horns provided a high degree f or the r ider.
1 1
t o
b elieve
They must therefore
o f
s tability
have been e ither f or s haping the pommel on the inside or purely f or decoration on the outside. have
l ooked
v ery
Used outside they would c ertainly
f lashy and typically R oman .
l ittle t o s upport this s uggestion and M rs. b elow)
However t here i s
van D riel-Murray
( see
strongly f avours the f ormer solution.
I II T he main r equirements of a s addle a re that i t provides
t he
r ider w ith a s ecure s eat and that i t t ransfers the weight of the r ider
f rom
t he spine to the f lanks of t he horse.
a chieved by padding the saddle underneath
The l atter i s
( see F ig.6)
l eaving
a
c hannel down the m iddle s o that the c entre of the t ree i s r aised a bove the horse's spine and withers. a ttached
e ither
t o
t he
b een entirely s eparate.
The padding could have been
t ree or to the f laps o r it could have
I stuffed the area where the s ide panels
t urned under and this s eemed to work f airly well. W ith the s addle padded and the g irth strap attached i n m anner
t he
d escribed
above
t he s addle was r eady to be r idden .
horse was not too
happy
a bout
a ccepted
i t
w ithout
t oo
t he
much
b ut
he
t he
pommels
e fficiency
d id
not s eem to be much affected by t he s ize of the
When
( Fig.8c,
s itting
d ,
e ).
a
e ntirely
s hape
I t i mmediately became
c lear t hat r ider.
were
unfamiliar
t rouble.
The
horse
t he
As a r esult,
s lips a l ittle further back.
r ider s omersaulting
out
t ightening
knees
of
t he
of
r ider's
l egs
s tock
s played
o ut
t he
pommels.
A
s limmer
r ider
s addle
b ackwards.
A
s light
under the f ront pommels would be all c oming
o ut
of
S imilar projections can be f ound on modern rodeo and
s addles.
T hey
p revent the r ider being pulled out of the
s addle when roping cattle. v ery
t heir
The f ront pommels prevent the
t hat was required if the r ider f elt that he was t he s addle.
a nd
i f the r ider s lips backwards his
h ips become l odged between the back j ust
f unctional
A Roman
c avalryman
must
have
f elt
s ecure in t he knowledge that he would not be pulled out of
t he s addle when his spear struck home. At t he end of my f irst r ide I encountered d ismounting
-
w ithout
s tirrups
t he
p roblem
one could not d ismount a s one
would a b icycle a s the pommels were designed to keep one i n s addle. pommels
o f t he
I t was s uggested t hat I swing my l eft l eg over the f ront a nd
s lide
down the r ight s ide i n the s itting position
a nd this worked well.
P l.III: The s addle horns hold the r ider f irmly in place
-
e ven
i n potentially d isastrous s ituations common in combat.
1 2
H H H r 1 f l .
t 2 4
I V T he
r econstructed
M ilitary
E quipment
University
i n
t he
g reat interest , s ome
s addle was presented to t he Third Roman
S eminar s pring
which
was
h eld
of 1985 where,
i t a lso met with
a t
Nottingham
a lthough i t provoked
c onsiderable
o pposition .
F or
t ime I had been in contact with Mrs Carol van D riel-Murray
o f t he Albert E gges v an G iffen I nstitute of P re- and P rotohisory i n Amsterdam who had been studying the
R oman
t he
s everal
Netherlands
a nd
e lsewhere
i nterest
i n
f or
t he
l eatherwork y ears
a nd
g reat
c onvinced
o f i ts e ssential accuracy had s ome reservations about However ,
and
s he
e xpressed
t he interpretation o f the stitching.
r econstruction
f rom whilst
d iscussion l ed
t o
t he f ollowing observations: F irstly
t he
s eam running f rom the top of the f ront pommel
t o the point of the dart
( Fig.7a,
t he
f ormed
c ut
o ut
l eather,
A ,D,E),
t he
l ower
p art
V-shaped
a s mooth continuous
r econstruction and t herefore s upported t hat
which i s
t he
on
l ine on the
s uggestion
( above)
o f the pommel f acing was stitched to the
l eading edge of the s ide pommel. S econdly where t he ( Fig.2)
l eather i s doubled up in s everal
p laces
i t s eemed t o be more than coincidence that two of these
p laces were j ust above the darts where the
l eather
t urns
over
b e t ubject to
t he f ront and back o f the t ree and would t herefore g reater wear. Thirdly
t he
c hange
f rom
n eat to coarse s titching
o ccurs on a ll known examples of s addles e xplanation
( van
D riel-Murray
P ers.
r eceives c omm .)
t echnique of f irst s ewing an inside and
a
because
' invisible'
' which
f unctional o f
t he
s eams on the
pommel covers which was turned inside out l eaving the corners to be attached by a c oarser external l ine of s titching at the
base
( Fig.1). D oubts
e xpressed
by
M rs
v an
D riel-Murray concerned the
s titching of the d art and the s ide f laps t o which
was
f undamental
t o
t he
t he r econstruction.
pommel
D r Groenman-van
Waateringe considered that the r equisite p ieces had had s titched over them i .e. was
n o evidence f or the s ide T here
a
t rim
a bound hem not a s eam - c ertainly there
j ust a s e asily have hung down r econstruction.
f acing
was
f laps turning under and they could t he
s ides
c ertainly
a s
i n
s culptural
t he
p revious
e vidence
t o
s upport t his but i f that were the c ase i t would be impossible to c alculate t he s ize and shape of the tree.
P LIV:
T he horns o n the s addle allowed the r ider d egree of mobility and balance.
1 5
a
r emarkable
Unfortunately
e ven
r e-examining
t he
V alkenburg/Vechten
p ieces s eemed u nlikely t o shed f urther l ight f or the pieces came f rom s everal d ifferent s addles and therefore t he stitching could n ever be matched. B efore returning to Holland Mrs v an Wakefield
C astleford in Yorkshire. part
D riel-Murray
w ent
o f
Among these were the pommel f acing
and
t he main l eather f rom a s addle but she d id not r ealize
a t the t ime that she had in her hands t he solution to the p roblem .
Later ,
a s
s he
was
able
t o
whole
r evealed t o t he Fourth Roman M ilitary
E quipment S eminar held at Newcastle University in s he
t o
t o examine the recent f inds of Roman l eatherwork f rom
r estitch
t he
s pring
1 986,
two p ieces and found that the
s titching holes matched not only down t he s ides but
a lso
a long
t he bottom proving that the s ide f lap was indeed stitched to the bottom
o f
t he pommel
( Fig.7b).
This had been t he weakest point
o f my r econstruction but i t was now entirely v indicated. The Castleford f ragments which s uffer f rom e xtreme wear and t ear,
have not yet been published.
Their i nterpretation i s
v ery
d ifficult and r equires a f ar more detailed account than could be p ublished
here.
I t will be published by M rs v an D riel-Murray a s
p art of the Castleford r eport. her evidence l eading
I t i s s ufficient to s ay here that
l ends considerable
e dge
o f
weight
t o
t he
c ase
f or
t he
t he s ide f lap being s titched t o the bottom of
t he pommel f acing.
V Although the s addle has been t ried out on a t imes
i t
c ould be tested t horoughly. c onstructed
and
A wooden horse
t he saddle bolted to i t.
t he Roman cavalry course held 1 986.
horse
s everal
s eemed e ssential to build a v aulting horse s o t hat i t
a t
D urham
1 4
hands
high
was
This was t ried out at University
i n
April
D r David B reeze volunteered to vault into t he saddle f rom
e ither s ide as d escribed by Vegetius.
This
proved
t o
b e
much
e asier than expected as we had anticipated some r eticence on the p art
o f the men because of the pommels.
f eat about a dozen t imes and f ound g ripping
i t
D r Breeze performed the e asiest
w ith
one
hand
t he n earer f ront pommel and t he other in the c entre of
t he s addle
( see P late I ).
C onstable
o f
t he
E rmine
This was
l ater r epeated
by
M r
C live
S treet Guard wearing a s cale c uirass
weighing about 1 2kg. I mportant s ignificant
t hough
were
l ong s lashing sword. t he
e lliptical
t hese
e xperiments
were,
f ar
more
t he experiments carried out with a shield and The shield was a
r econstruction
s hield c over f rom Valkenburg.
b ased
on
This shield which
was about 1 .3m l ong and s omewhat over 6 5cm wide with a weight of
1 6
a bout
7 kg covered t he
r ider f rom shoulder to ankle and acted as
a counter balance t o the sword The sword was a copy of s outhern
G ermany.
about
1 -5kg.
drawn
with
I t
was
( Plate IV). a
s patha
j ust
not
t he
r ight
Rottweil
only
I t
i mmediately
i t
could
became
pommels,
obvious
f or
t he
momentum
but with the pommels
possible f or the r ider to s lash out to the r ight , of the sword reaching out almost two metres,
it was
with the point
and to use the
f ront pommel to pull himself back into the saddle with his s ame
I n
f act i n
the
s addle.
This has
whole view of the Roman cavalry. s hock
tactics
l eft l eft
t he pommels were performing almost exactly the
function as stirrups in allowing the rider
position
be
would it be impossible to wield a sword of this
pull the r ider off the horse,
t high.
in
l ong and weighed
hand with the scabbard on the r ight hip
s ize and weight without the saddle would
a t
It was f irst of all e stablished that
which many people had doubted. that
f ound
over a metre
were
r egain
s erious implications
The
i mpossible
t o
l ong
a ccepted
his
for our
v iew
t hat
before the introduction of the
s tirrup will have to be reconsidered. I would l ike to thank Mrs Carol van t remendous
help
t hat she has
D riel-Murray
of the saddle and i n preparing this article. t o
thank
a ll
Hassall of the
those
f or
the
g iven me both in the construction I would
a lso
l ike
who have encouraged me e specially Mr Mark
Institute of Archaeology and D r Brian Dobson
and
P rofessor John Mann of Durham University.
B IBLIOGRAPHY C URI AE,
J .:
A
Roman
Frontier
Newstead i n the
Post and i ts
P arish of Melrose
P eople.
( Glasgow
The Fort of 1 911)
( for
the Newstead f inds) GROENMAN VAN
WAATERINGE,
Z .H., K IMMIG,
W .:
D .: d es Vor-
Romeins
Nederlandse Oudheden 2 ,
l ederwerk u it Valkenburg ( Groningen 1 967)
' Ein K e1tenschild aus Aegypten ',
1 06-11 P LANCK,
W .:
Germania 24,
1 940,
( for the Fayyum shield)
Arae
F laviae
I .
Neue Untersuchungen z ur Geschichte
römischen Rottweil, u nd
F orschungen
Frühgeschichte
( Stuttgart 1 975)
( for
i n
t he Rottweil
1 7
und
B erichte
B aden-Württemberg f inds)
z ur 6 ,
F IGURE CAPTIONS Fig.1:
The
s addle f ragments
Netherlands,
f rom Valkenburg and Vechten in the
after Dr W .
a : The main piece
Groenman-van Waateringe.
f rom Valkenburg which i s
s hown
i n
a
r econstructed form in Fig.2. b & c : d :
Fragments of s imilar pieces from Vechten .
Pommel
e & f :
Fig.2:
f acings
Pommel
S implified
f rom Valkenburg.
f acings
from Vechten .
r econstruction of the main Valkenburg piece.
The stippled areas are where the l eather i s double. P .
Pommels;
f acings
X .
Crescent shaped holes;
( see Fig.1,e);
PF2.
PF1.
Type 2 pommel
Type 1 pommel f acings
( see
F ig.1, d).
Fig.3:
D r
Groenman-van
Waateringe's
r econstruction
o f
the
s addle components.
Fig.4:
The rear,
L-shaped pommel
stiffeners
from Rottweil after
P lanck.
Fig.5:
T he
f ront pommel
Fig.6a:
The
f ront of the s addle t ree.
the
shape
of
stiffeners
t he
horse
f rom Rottweil after P lanck.
The l ight stippling
at
s tippling shows the padding
t he
withers.
n ecessary
t o
s hows
T he
protect
d ark t he
horse. b :
The
back
of
t he
s addle
t ree.
The
shows the shape of the horse across the back.
T he
r aise
Fig.7:
dark
s tippling
t he saddle above
l ight stippling c entre
Fig.8,a & b :
t he
s hows the padding needed to
the horse's spine.
T he suggested method of stitching the pommel t he
o f
f acing
t o
f ront pommels of the main Valkenburg l eather.
S ide
s addle
and threequarter front v iew of the Valkenburg
r econstructed
complete
1 8
w ith
g irth
s trap
and
a ttachments f or the crupper and breast plate. c ,
d & e : T he
s itting
position f rom the s ide,
back and
t op. f : A f allen horse shown on the Julii monument R emi
i n
s outhern
F rance.
s addle with c rupper,
T his
f rom
S t.
s hows a f our pommeled
breast plate and
g irth
s trap
a ll
possibly a ttached to s addle f laps. g : A
d etail
f rom
Mainz in G ermany.
t he
t ombstone
o f Gaius Romanius at
I t shows a l ozenge-shaped s addle
with
pommels f itting c losely t o the thighs and hips.
F ig.9,a, b ,
c & d : Front,
u nderneath,
back and top v iews of the
r econstructed s addle without g irth s trap.
The two p ieces
X ,X are totally hypothetical. e : A possible r econstruction of the g irth s trap attached t o f laps which are stitched to the wood of the tree This would
have
c overing
was
had
t o
put
c rupper attachments f laps.
b e over a re
attached
before
t he tree.
The breast plate and
a lso
s hown
This i s entirely hypothetical.
1 9
t he
s titched
l eather t o
t he
0
2 0 c r e ,
Fig.1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
* I .
s , . ....
. .....
. .... ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ......
•••
• • . . . . . . . . .• . .
2 0
•
a
F RONT
20c m
F ig. 2
2 1
Fig. 3
2 2
210
/ 0
F ig.4
2 3
I
o
1 0
210 c . rn
Fig. 5
F ig. 6
b
a
2 4
•
•.
• • •
- I
..
. 1
.
'N •
• • I .
• .• • •I . ••
. . • I • ' • •• • .
F ig. 7
2 5
f
d
g
Fig .8
c
e
2 6
a
F ig .9
2 7
P 1.1:
T he c ornu u nder t rials a t the R oyal M ilitary College of M usic 1 Kneller Hall,
2 8
ON MAKING A R OMAN CORNU P eter B arton
I n
1 984
I
w as
approached by the Roman Military R esearch
S ociety to make a Roman military cornu; i nstrument well as
r esearches over
r evealed
n omenclature,
t ranspired that a cornu i s
r eal
a s
considerable t o
in f act a
what
a
g eneric
confusion ,
cornu
t erm
was.
I t
covering
a
v ariety of musical horns made of a variety of materials
s heet i ron ,
brass,
cast and sheet bronze,
and animal horn.
l ength too varied f rom less than 100cm up to R eference ( tube)
was
a s
m ade
in
Roman
t imes
' horribilis sonitus',
s onitus',
' raucitas',
Amongst
t he
' rudor',
f amily
' terribilis ' clangor',
of
Lituus and Carnyx:
Cornua,
v ero
4
metres.
s onitus',
and
' fracti
' gravis'.
authorities distinguish following species:
Beginning straight but curving in the bell s ection.
3 5cm to 80cm ,
cavalry.
The carnyx usually decorated with
animal head bells. Tuba
nearly
-
Their
to the sound of the Tuba
i nsofar as there i s agreement - between the
2 .
a
which would produce an effective and viable sound as
I nitial
1 .
be
r eproducing an original i nstrument.
e specially g reat
this was to
d irecta:
S traight ,
probably
u sed
by
Conical bore.
short,
of bronze or i ron ,
somewhat l onger than but akin to the f ox
and
short
English hunting horn
( for
and varying in l ength
f rom 1 05cm to 1 80cm .
hunting),
Also conical bore. 3 .
Cornu/Bucina/Tuba
Curva:
A group of considerable confusion!
All curved, c ircle,
some helical,
some almost full
with a wooden cross-piece,
ranging
in l ength f rom 1 40cm to nearly 4m . The horn required by the Society G roup
3
a bove,
f ound
i llustrated in the
in
P ompeii
' Pompeii AD79'
was and
t he now
cataloguel
military i n
and
t ype,
Naples,
but
described
f ollows: ' Bronze horn 1 .20m.
( cornu);
Naples
height 1 .28m width 1 .10m;
Museum ,
o ld inv.
tube i s approximately 3 .3m c ircle
l ong,
and held by a transverse
in ivory),
1 277. bent strut
which rested on the player's
a lmost
i nto
The a
( probably covered shoulder so that
the bell of t he horn appeared above his head.'
2 9
diameter
From Pompeii.
a s
3 .
2 .
Fig.1:
The
P ompeii
M ahillon
cornu
( 2 & 4 )
( 1),
w ith
t he
r econstructions of
and Alexander ( 3).
S everal copies of the instrument have already been made but w ith a variety of i naccuracies. o f
B russels;
t he
The f irst copy was
M ahillon - this t ime in F lorence. i n B russels. A s
a
by
M ahillon
s econd by Alexander o f Mainz 2 and another by 3
There i s one f urther
e xample
4
m ilitary
i nstrument
was
n eeded i t s eemed t hat the
P ompeian example would be the most appropriate.
Many o f t he
oft
quoted Latin references to the sound o f t he Tuba would s uggest a l onger
r ather
than
a
s horter instrument,
e specially
' gravis'
which would hardly be appropriate to t he short Tuba v ero d irecta o r to the Lituus or Carnyx.
3 0
Another o riginal,
important
which
p roduced the
was
c onsideration p layable,
was
was
i n
t hat G
the
( loft)
fundamental and a ll the harmonies up
P ompeian
and r eadily
t o
t he
1 6th
w ith e ase. I t
was
t herefore
d ecided
t hat
a
P ompeian instrument should be attempted, a nd
u nadorned
s tructure
d ictated
r econstruction of the
in brass,
by
t he
with a
l imits
basic
o f
f unds
a vailable. S o,
f rom a c onsideration of the evidence available,
p hotos
o f
modern
t he and
' reconstructions'
by
Mahillon
A lexander ,
and t he exhibition catalogue photo
o f
t he
o riginal,
i t
o riginal,
t he
o f
P ompeian
was c lear a modern r econstruction of the Pompeian
in brass, would be f ar
c loser
t o
an
o riginal
t han
a nything e lse on show at present. F rom
the
p hoto of the Pompeian original,
I e stimated that
t he l engths of t he three s ections were roughly in the proportion 1 :3:1,
i .e.
Bell s ection to top T s ocket of handle 7 26cm ;
b etween T handle sockets 1 886cm ; r eceiver
6 97cm .
' mouth-pipe'
l ength
beginning
o f
This made f or a shorter mouth-pipe s ection than
t hat of the Alexander reconstruction
( Fig.1,3)
f inished
a rticle
more
i n
o riginals
( Fig.1,1
& 5 ).
The Alexander
t o
t o
keeping
w ith
but
photos
produced o f
a
e xisting
' reconstruction '
a ppears
a ttempt to maintain the curve of the back-bow into an almost
f ull c ircle. I
was
a lso
' reconstruction ' d iameter 1 10mm ; T hese,
being
o riginal, t ook
s upplied i n
t he
w ith
t ubing OD at top e asy
t o
s o used them .
d imensions
B russels c opy ,
M useum :
T I
2 2mm7
t he
M ahillon
b ell-end
o f
i nternal
a t
bottom
T
1 6mm .
t ook a s those of the Pompeian
R eceiver and mouth piece measurements
I
f rom plastic casts taken f rom an exhibit in the Colchester
M useum .
T HE
' BELL '
SECTION
A c omparison of the i llustration of the ( Fig.1,1) with t hose of Mahillon 's ( Fig.1,3),
i s
a
o riginal
and A lexander 's
e nough to indicate t hat these made no a ttempt t o
m atch the original's bell profile l ike
P ompeian
( Fig.1,2 & 4 )
n arrow bore trombone bell,
have a r einforced r im of s orts,
a nd
r im .
A lexander's
while Mahillon 's,
l ooks
which does
i s s till a s s traight a s a f lower
v ase. E xamining t he photo of the s imilarity at the bell-end,
' original'
I was struck
by
i ts
t o that of a N igerian Kakaki which I
3 1
had
once
r estored.
t he bell-end, 9 0°
to the
This had a wide f lat r im at r ight angles t o
with a s much width again i nside the bell,
r im .
5
This
protective
appendage
m ust
hammered
have
b een
B ell
R im R im
Fig.2:
a n
e arly
f orerunner
D etails of Kakaki bell.
o f the bell-frame or Garland.
I t herefore
d ecided that such a strengthening of the bell-end would be a ppropriate.
However ,
most
a s the r im brass had to be f airly thin to
a llow of i t being hammered and stretched to l ie a long the i nside o f the bell,
it was not v ery strong.
s lightly l arger in c ircumference,
S o
I
c ut
a nother
r ing,
t o s lip over t he f inished bell
t o l ie back to back with the f irst r im .
S econd r im ,
soldered and
hammered over f irst r im Fig.3:
D etails of construction of bell.
B ELL PROFILE T he f lare was i ntended t o begin at 2 2mm at t he top T s ocket a nd b ell. t he
i ncrease r egularly to a d iameter of 1 10mm a t the end of the The curve i ntended can be s een f rom P ompeian
o riginal
r ather l ike an outsize,
( Fig.1,1).
I
t he
i llustration
s elf-adhesive patch
f or a tapered
t ube.
T rimmed and notched t o a llow c urving and l ater s eaming
Fig.4:
D etails of construction of bell.
3 2
o f
t reated t he bell s ection
) collar s ilver s oldered to handle socket
Tapered
t ube with
c ollar for strength
Wood cross handle
/ 1 7
Fig.5:
D etails of handle socket.
The result left much to be desired, two
T
but d id look convincing.
The
s ockets to hold the wooden cross-piece were built up out
of 2 layers of lmm wall tubing,
with a f iller of 0 .5mm .
BACK-BOW This, outside
a length of 1 .9m ,
was taken in one
d iameter 0 .5mm thick tubing,
and expanded to 2 2mm at the other. weak points,
p iece
f rom
1 9mm
tapered to 1 6mm at one end
Thus the
j oins,
potentially
are inside the T sockets.
' MOUTH-PIPE' This modern
l ooks
s hort
( 0.7m),
r econstructions,
original
f rom
but
P ompeii shows
compared
a s
a lready
with s tated
s imilar proportions.
worthy of consideration i s that this
t hose on other above,
the
Another point
f irst s ection i s apparently
only supported at one end and i s therefore extremely vulnerable. B ut,
on this point M .
t oo ,
s ince for one of his reproductions
s upporting
p iece
c ross-piece. r eceiver
of
Mahillon must have pondered ( Fig.1,2),
t his
problem
he supplied a
brass between the receiver and the wooden
I have supplied a s imilar support but
r inging
the
j ust below the mouth-piece.
RECEIVER AND MOUTH-PIECE Many
originals,
being of thick metal,
3 3
have been unearthed
by a rchaeologists possibilities.
and
B ehn
provides
a
s election
The receiver i s a lmost cylindrical outside,
j ust
o f
t apering
s lightly to the detachable mouth-piece. Mouth t ube
_ Narrow throat,
Hemispherical cup
expanding
t o l ong back bore Fig.6:
Mouthpiece.
I f ound the mouth-piece, m ade
c entering
with sharp edge and narrow throat ,
notes very d ifficult,
and for playing purposes,
s upplied a cut-down cornet mouth-piece. U sing this l atter i ncisive
t one,
f rom
p layed softly , F rench
Horn
I t he
was
a ble
t o
produce
the instrument produced a sound i n
F ,
but,
a
g ood
f at ,
f undamental up through 16 harmonies. played Brasse,
not
unlike
t he
i t produced the sort of -C i-
C )
a t z d a c 3
o
° 0
( 1 3
n
o
0
Fig.7:
The above are the harmonic s eries range
o f
the
r econstructed
which
c ornu
-
r epresent t his
r ange
i s
specific to the instrument and any
c hange
shape,
a d ifferent range of
o r
volume
would
sounds.
3 4
produce
i n
t he
i nternal
Fig.8:
T he completed cornu.
Although o stensibly a
c ornu i s based on t hree d istinct c urves.
3 5
s piral,
t he
sound characterised in the Latin quotations
mentioned
And,
i f
i t
could
corresponds
the
s ound
' Grave',
t his
to the much valued Roman quality of
D esigned ' carrying'
c ertainly
a s
a
s ignal
qualities
horn,
e arlier. a djective
' Gravitas'.
i t s hould
possess
good
and test were s ubsequently carried out on
instrument.
THE TESTS The reproduction of the cornu had been originally conceived to test its efficacy in the
f ield - to
e stablish
i ts
material
range and potential carrying power. The in the the
cornu
reproduced by P .
Barton was subsequently tested
f ield by the Roman Military Research Society.
behest
of
Mr
John Eagle at Gresham 's School,
cornu was used in a demonstration by the three
perfect
and
Firstly
loud notes.
the instrument besides
the
Society
a t
Norfolk the
and
produced
Further experiments showed that
' terribilis sonitus'
was
capable
of
more subtlety producing a haunting quality when played softly. A
third test was carried out by t he army at Kneller Hal1,
where a bugler, c alls.
He
using his own mouth piece played s everal
ended with a ' Trumpet Voluntary'
with a full demonstration of
t he
harmonics
and these, were
6
modern together
r ecorded
on
cassette and reproduced at the Nottingham conference.
NOTES 1 .
WARD-PERKINS & CLARIDGE,
2 .
BEHN ,
1912,
' 111
( N164)
3 .
4 .
4 1
1976,
Item 3 03.
and accompanying illustration.
Tuba C urva,
19 copy by M ahillon ,
Pompeii,
l ength
Cherubini,
Palazzo Vecchio Firenze.'
No.466
' cornu'
d 'Histoire, should
l ength
Conservatorio
1 40cm
Brussels Catalogue,
however
follows:
3 43cm :
be
a
Bucina,
( Branch D - instr.
( Musse vol.I)
Tuba Romana f rom d i
Musica
Royale - f rom its
a lthough
a Imbouchure)
Luigi
d 'Art
e t
l ength this
i t i s described as 466
Cornu.
1 40cm ,
including mouth piece. 5 .
From
an
1980,
P 1.111,3 & 5 .
e xample
r estored
by
3 6
t he author,
s ee also BAINES ,
6 .
Royal M ilitary S chool of Music,
Kneller Hall,
Twickenham .
APPENDIX by N .P. Wickenden T rumpet mouthpieces, known
i n
B ritain
and W ickford,
probably for u se
f rom Colchester,
E ssex.
1
on
in advance of a
o n
a
s ite
a re
Lydney P ark,
2
3
The l ast example came f rom the excavations
4
by Warwick Rodwell in 1 971 t he
t he c ornu ,
Verulamium ,
o f
l ate
housing
d evelopment
p re-Roman
I ron
Age
s ettlement/Romano-British v illa. M ilitary presence on ' t he s ite i s s trongly
s uggested
by a number of bronzes,
m artingale and hinged c oins;
C laudian-Neronian
' military-style' c arried
out
ditch.
i n
T rust ,
coin
p roduced 5
including part of a
p re-Roman
l ist an a s,
as u sed on coins a t
o f Moguntiacum ( Mainz).
e xcavations i s being
mount; brooches;
The
1 978
c ounterstamped TIB.IM , f ort
harness
and
and a
f rom
C laudian
l ength
watching
p robably t he
of
b riefs
o f T iberius,
R hine
f rontier
Post-excavation work on R odwell's
u ndertaken
by
C helmsford
A rchaeological
and a report will appear in due course.
The
W ickford
i ncomplete , The hole,
mouthpiece
( Fig.9,4)
i s
o f
with a low moulding around t he base
a s s een in the broken end,
c opper a lloy , o f
t he
mouth.
i s not central.
l i 1 P ; A l i . 4 4 , 1 0 s ho q . , , •' •
3 . Fig.9: •
T rumpet Park,
mouthpieces f rom Colchester,
and Wickford.
3 8
Verulamium ,
Lydney
NOTES
( numbers
as F ig.9)
1 .
Colchester Museum Report
2 .
FRERE,
3 .
WHEELER & WHEELER ,
4 .
WICKENDEN forthcoming.
5 .
M .
1 972,
1 937-44,
2 8-9 and plate 4 .
F ig.40,129. 1 932,
F ig.16,47.
Context Cat.3128.
Hammerson in COUCHMAN,
1979,
43-4.
B IBLIOGRAPHY BAINES
1 980:
A .
B aines,
D evelopment, B EHN 1912:
F .
B ehn,
' Die
Z eitschrift 7 , COUCHMAN
1 979:
C .
FRERE 1972:
&
S .S.
&
Frere, ( Oxford
r ömischen
( ed.),
H eer',
Mainzer
' Work of Essex County Council
1 978',
E ssex
Archaeol
Verulamium Excavations,
Hist
1 1,
C LARIDGE
WHEELER Lydney
( Oxford
1 ,
Soc Antiq Res
1972) 1 976:
J .
Ward-Perkins & A .
Claridge,
( Bristol 1976) 1 932:
Excavation of the i n
im
3 6ff
S ection ,
P ompeii AD79, WHEELER
Their History and
3 2-77
R ep 2 8, WARD-PERKINS
Instruments:
Musik
1912,
Couchman
Archaeology 1 979,
Brass
( London 1980)
R .E. M.
Wheeler
P rehistoric,
Park,
&
T .V.
Wheeler ,
Roman and Post-Roman S ite
Gloucestershire,
Soc Antiq Res Rep 9 ,
1 932)
W ICKENDEN f orthcoming: S ettlement
at
N .P.
Wickenden ,
B eauchamps
The
P rehistoric and Roman
Farm ,
Chelmsford Archaeological Trust R ep.
3 9
Wickford, 8 ,
E ssex,
( forthcoming)
T HE ROMAN M ILITARY T UNIC N .
The
o riginal
a im
o f
Fuentes
t his
p aper was to d iscuss both the
d esign and t he colour of the Roman l egionary tunic in the p art
o f
t he
2 nd
c entury A .D.
However,
e vidence f or colour of tunics in t hat period, b een
g reatly extended in both d irections
s o a s t o bracket i t. r elating
t o
t he
This
i n
t urn
the time span
has
( forward to c .A .D.300)
b rought
c olour of centurions'
n aval tunics and,
f irst
because of t he l ack of
t ogether
uniforms,
t o a very l imited e xtent,
m aterial
of cloaks,
of
of auxiliary tunics,
a ll of which has been thought worthy of inclusion.
PART 1 - D ESIGN
T HE M ILITARY TUNIC OF THE REPUBLICAN PERIOD A s g ood depictions in this period
s how
only
s oldiers
i n
a rmour,
i t i s not possible to evince the detailed designs of the
t unics
worn.
T he monument of Aemilius P aullus
' Altar of Domitius Ahenobarbus' f rom
S eville
( c.100
( 1st c entury B .C.)
B .C.),
( 167 B .C.), the
2
I st c entury B .C.) 4 a ll show the bottom
e dge
of
b eing e ither j ust above the knee or at m id-thigh. t he
the
bas-relief
and the Glanum r elief
3
1
t he
( ? l ate
t unic
a s
I n the case of
f irst three e xamples the s leeves appear to be m inimal which
s upports t he remark of Gellius t hat the original Roman tunic was n arrow and s leeveless.
5
C IVILIAN TUNICS F or the l ate R epublic and t he f irst two Empire
t here
a re
many
c ivilians in tunics, f amily. a s
d epictions
i n
c enturies
v arious
ranging f rom the poorest
t o
o f
f orms of
t he
I mperial
I t i s noticeable that men engaged in physical work,
f armworkers
a nd
f ishermen ,
a re
t he
a rt
s uch
o ften shown a s having the
r ight shoulder bared. Most tunics o ffering
w ine
w ere t o
a
s leeveless,
' T-shirt',
7
while
a ) be of
' slit'
e xample,
on
g uest at a P ompeian banquet.
have c losed neck openings, r ight shoulder,
f or
o thers,
6
man
S ome tunics
somewhat in the manner of the
modern
i n order to a llow the baring of the
appear to:
f rom shoulder to shoulder with only a short
s titching
t he
holding
t he
back
4 1
and
f ront
l ength
t ogether ,
f or
Fig.1
( left):
Vine dresser - note the l ong s lit on the shoulder
which allows the arm through so a s shoulder, STRONG, Fig.2
( right):
e xample,
but
1 923,
l eaves
t he
t o
' sleeve'
bare
t he
r ight
stitched up ( after
tay.XLIII).
D efaced olive harvester ,
f rom Cordova - note the
l arge knot behind the neck and t he folds
o f
l eading up to i t
p1.175).
( after BANDINELLI,
1971,
a vine dresser f rom the Torre del P adiglione
t he
t unic
( Fig.1).
8
b ) have the back and f ront j oined at the shoulder by a f ibula or s ome
o ther
e xample,
f orm
of
a ttachment,
the f uller f rom S ens.
r ather
t han being s ewn ,
9
T unics are u sually g irdled at the waist and, bottom
e dge
t o
be
g irt
at
t he
( late i st century A .D.)
4 2
to
d esired height,
material i s pulled up over the belt and a llowed to Q uintilian
for
a llow
the
the s urplus b louse
out.
notes t hat f or the person who
has
n ot
t he
r ight
t o
t he l ati
c lavi,
the edge of his tunic
s hould c ome a l ittle below the knee.IU E xamples of this a re
numerous,
f or example,
f ashion
the bronze s tatue of a youth i n the
C apitoline Museumll o r t he bas-relief of a rabbit s eller and his c ustomer. 1 2 O ccasionally , a s
t he
o live
a f igure i s shown in an unbelted
o il s eller in Cherchel Museum ,
a lso f requent d epictions of civilians who, p hysical
work,
have
a bove their knees;
hitched
t he
t unic
s uch
while t here are
1 3
when engaged in
hard
bottom edge of their tunics
this e specially applies to f arm-workers.
1 4
T he l ength o f ungirdled tunics varies somewhat on a rtistic r epresentations, b ut u sually comes down t o mid-calf. There i s a p recise
m easurement
r ecommends
g iven
by
C ato
( c.160
w ith t unics of a l ength of 31 2 R / oman f eet E lsewhere i n l iterature, c entury
B .C.)
o f purple) p anels
o f a tunic with c lavi
o f material s ewn together.
c offin l ids
3 ft 5 in).
on
s ome
f rom Egypt.
o f
1 7
back
1 5
( mid ist
( the twin v ertical s tripes s eparate
while the
a ctual
s titching
t he i st and 2 nd century A .D. painted
1 8
p aper
a re
t he
o ccasional
v iews of tunic-clad workers who are shown with a
knotted bunch of m aterial at the back of the n eck e xample,
he
On many s culptures the s eam
1 6
O f particular interest to this o r
( 1.03m ;
clearly indicates that i t was made f rom two
d epicted
s ide
when
the description of Varro
on the s houlder i s c learly shown, i s
B .C.)
t hat i n a lternate years f arm s laves should be i ssued
t he o live harvester f rom Cordova
o pening ,
( Fig.2)
a ttending magistrates and l ictors f rom Waltersdorf, (F ig. 3 ) .2 0
f or
and a s lave
1 9
east Austria
The most obvious explanation f or the gathering of t he o f
t he n eck opening in t his
m ethod of opening.
c onsiderably
back
f ashion would be that i t i s an easy
r educing
t he
s ize
o f
a
l arge
n eck
This i n t urn s uggests that s uch t unics are of the type,
m entioned
above,
which
have
a
s lit r unning f rom shoulder to
s houlder in order to a llow the baring of t he r ight shoulder. B y a happy c hance t he comparatively well preserved o f
s ome
e ighteen
c oloured
have been f ound i n the C ave of A .D.132-5)
in
t he
Nahal
L etters
H ever ,
O n the
l oom t he c lavi have been
a s
b ands
Two s uch
one
s elvage
woven
horizontally) within a r ectangular panel. a long
one
t orn apart,
p eriod
-
t hey have
2 1
another
t ogether
f rom
K ochba
t o
j oined
r unning
( Bar
where
a pparently been u sed as burial shrouds.
t hread
r emains
woollen tunics complete with c lavi
o f
( i.e. p anels
weft woven were
s elvage to f orm the shoulders of a
4 3
( F ig.3
( left):
P artly
d efaced
s lave,
f rom
Waltersdorf ,
E .
Austria - note the knot behind t he neck and folds of the t unic centering in on i t Fig.4
( right):
T unic-clad
( after ALFÖLDY ,
s oldier
1 974,
p 1.19).
i n a religious procession ,
f rom Trajan 's Column - note the f olds c entering
o n
t he
knot which appears to have been d oubly s ecured with s ome s ort
o f
t he belt
t unic,
while
s erve
a s
was
t hong ,
and the heavy b lousing over the back of
( after C ich.
2 73).
' the s ection between the bands was l eft unsewn'
a
n eck opening;
t hus,
2 2
f ormed of a s elvage f rom each panel which obviated t he
f or
a
s ewn hem .
However,
t o
t he bottom edge of t he tunic n eed
i t i s not c lear f rom t he report a s t o
whether t he s elvages at the shoulders were always s ewn up t o and i ncluding the c lavi,
or whether s ome could be of t he shoulder t o
s houlder s lit variety.
The s ewn borders o f no.7
b een c losed on the s ides, w ere
l eft
f or
t he
except at t he upper parts where
arms
1. 2 3
a nd
t unic
t heir
R oman
C ounterparts.
s hop
v arious
which
ide a has on the r ight hand s
t unic.
2 4
t o
s ign
s tages
P ompeii,
a ppears
d epicts
T he
m aterials, what
j oining
imilar t o, p anels were s
H ever
holes
I t would s eem r easonable t o infer
t hat the general methods of weaving N ahal
w ith
' show i t t o have
4 4
o f o f
worker
unic panel, b e a t
t ogether
t he
i f not the s ame a s, Verecundus
a t
m anufacture
o f
c oming
f orward
or perhaps a c omplete
F ig.5
( left):
R ower,
presumably a s oldier ,
f rom Trajan 's Column
- note t he knot and t he f olds again ( Cich. F ig.
e( right):
B are-shouldered s oldier
c utting
2 09). d own
a
t ree,
f rom Trajan's Column - note t he l ack of a s emblance of a s leeve and the apparent d earth of s titching on t he r ight hand s ide of t he t unic
O f
( after C ich.
t he ten Nahal Hever t unics where i t i s possible t o t ake
m easurements of t heir o riginal l onger
t han
d imensions,
t o
d hildren.
( no.17),
2 5
L eaving
L ikewise,
t o 3 ft 3 in),
a side
l ength
t hem
a re
s ome a
t unics
m ay
have
p articularly s mall
with an average of
0 .93m
( 3ft
t he t unic widths r ange f rom 0 .60m to 1 .00m ( 2ft
with an average of 0 .79m ( 2ft 7 in) .26
m ay be compared with Cato's 31 2 R / oman f eet t he
o f
t he l engths of the t unics measure between 0 .72m
a nd 1 .12m ( 2ft 4 in and 3 ft 8 in), i m ).
n ine
t hey are broad; while i t i s not possible t o arrive
a t the height and build of t heir owners, b elonged e xample
2 43).
( 1.03m ;
T hese f igures 3 ft
5 in)
f or
of a s lave's t unic and with t he one n early complete
4 5
s ingle-piece woollen adult's t unic D ura
E uropos,
w ide or, w ide. 27
which i s c .0.92m
i ncluding
t he
( with
( 3ft)
s leeve
s hort
s leeves)
f rom
l ong and c .0.66m ( 2ft 2 in)
l engths,
c .1.03m
( 3ft
41 2i / n)
T HE LEGIONARY TUNIC O n
T rajan's
C olumn t unic-clad l egionaries d epicted in one of three basic f orms of dress: 28 a ) dressed only in a tunic where
a
back
r ear
building
( Cich.
r oads C ich.
both
s houlders
o r s ide v iew i s shown ,
m aterial at the ( Fig.4
w ith
2 73)
o f
t he
and
c overed
but,
with a bunched knot of
n eck
2 55-6),
a re normally
opening,
f or
e xample,
t aking part in a procession
rowing
( Fig.5
-
C ich.
8 2-6
and
2 09-12); b )
dressed
i n a tunic and c loak - sometimes the bunched knot of
m aterial still s hows, p rocesion c )
dressed
( Cich. in
f or example,
the
a rmour
d epicted
m usicians
w ith
a ' scarf'
i n a knot at the throat,
u sually
t he
l egionary
unlike the scarves t ied
which the auxiliaries wear.
O nly one s cene shows soldiers dressed in a t unic s houlder
( Fig.6 - C ich.
b ared 2 41-4).
a t
t he
w ith
t he
while f elling t rees and excavating earth However,
t he r ight hand s ide of the tunic
appears not to have been stitched e ither at the o r
a
around his n eck with one l ength
c rossing over another under the chin ,
r ight
i n
when t here i s no v isible indication of a
b unched knot at the back of the neck; i s
two
2 73);
r ight s ide.
r ight
s houlder
As this i s t he only s cene on the Column
d epicting the s tate of dress,
the apparent vagary may perhaps be
a ttributed t o a s culptural error. T he depiction of a soldier's tunic with a bunched m aterial C olumn. on
t he
behind
t he
For example, Antonine
n eck
i t i s c learly shown on the t riumphal
B elvedere
s arcophagus
c ollection of debt tablets s cene r elief, ( Fig.8).
which
knot
a lso
o f
opening i s not confined to T rajan 's
o n
i llustrates
( Fig.7)
t he
t hat
2 9
H adrianic
s cene
and in the C hatsworth
t he tunic i s s leeveless
3 0
T he bunched
knot
o f
m aterial
b ehind
t he
n eck
opening
a ppears to have the f ollowing effects: a )
the
n eck
opening,
a ssuming
a shoulder s lit ,
i s r educed to
whatever s ize i s r equired; b ) because the knot draws material towards b ack, c )
t he
c entre
o f
t he
the tunic blouses out t o a considerable extent over the
back of the belt ( Fig.4); the knot a lso produces a cross t he back of the tunic a number o f f olds which c entre onto i t
( Fig.3, 4 6
4 and 7 );
F ig.7
( left):
S oldier
p rocession ,
c arrying
f rom
t he
a
p latform
i n
a pparent d ouble thonging around the knot, t he
t unic
t he belt F ig.8
( right):
c entering
1923,
S oldier carrying a r elief
s leeveless t unic,
the
-
a s
t he
knot
f ront
l ength
o f
t he
t aken
box
of t he
r ight
t ablets, knot,
f rom
t he
i s
i nto t he knot,
c omplete a rm bared
c learly
a rm
( after
S TRONG ,
( Cich.
f orward
i n
c haracteristic
a djustable
which f alls by
t he
f rom the
amount
d esign
t o those
8 2-6 and 2 09-12).
f ound at the Nahal Hever.
t unics at l east t his contention i s s ystem
o f
c ompulsory purchase
s trengthened
by
a
For military t he
o ther c lothing f rom both t owns and s mall v illages in Egypt. Judaea,
o f
known
f or t he Roman Army of tunics and
would s eem most l ikely that the system was prevalent i ncluding
of
f or example many rowers have the
I t has a lready been suggested that Roman tunics were s imilar
t he
( Fig.8);
s ide of the tunic,
s houlder t o make a ' sleeve', m aterial
of
f ig.179).
n ote
d rops
' V '-shaped f olds u nder t he chin the
f olds
p ulls in the material at the back of the s lit,
t he spare material in e )
the
' V '-shaped f old under the chin and
t he strap p assing under the 1 923, f ig.125).
d )
t riumphal
on the knot and the blousing over
( after STRONG,
C hatsworth
a
B elvedere s arcophagus - note the
3 1
I t
e lsewhere,
and one would therefore expect the designs to 4 7
b e basically the s ame. Two of the references to the compulsory purchase of i n
Egypt,
i n
A .D.128
and
A .D.138 ,
s pecifically t o t he wool weavers of
a re
t he
o rders
v illages
t unics r elating
c oncerned.
3 2
T his s uggests t hat the tunic of the ordinary soldier was made of wool. The u se of a s elvage to form the bottom edge of a tunic may e xplain
why
on
s ome
s culpture
a stitch l ine i s shown on the
v ertical edges of a paenula but not at t he f or example, T he
the Camomile Street soldier .
d epictions
c enturies A .D. f ront
e dge
o f
t he
continue the
m ilitary e arlier
' hem '
of
t he
t unic,
3 3
t unic
i n the f irst two s howing
t he
o f the tunic a s coming to j ust above the knee.
practice
o f
This
practice i s c onfirmed in l iterature by Q uintilian who notes that when a tunic's edge comes above the knee , c enturion.
T he
3 4
i mportance
t o
a
i t i s t he dress
s oldier
o f
d istinction i s i llustrated by one of the punishments by
Augustus
f or
On ( Fig.8)
a
( tunicati d iscincti).
number
I t
o f
monuments
i nstituted
o f
t he praetorium
i n
3 5
s uch a s t he Chatsworth r elief
i t i s of additional interest
c rossing over the
a
d ress
d ereliction of duty by c enturions whereby the
offenders were to stand a ll day in f ront beltless tunics
o f
t his
t o
n ote
t he
t hin
s trap
l eft shoulder and passing under the r ight arm .
appears to be in the same position a s a modern c avalry pouch
belt,
but i s much narrower.
t his
s trap
The most practical
on the r ight hand s ide of the sword
a pplication
f or
s eems to be to prevent the b lousing of the material
g rip ,
t unic
f rom
f alling
a cross
t he
which could otherwise make i t d ifficult to draw the
weapon. One f inal point not yet covered i s whether t he of the e arly 2 nd century A .D.
l egionaries
had c lavi woven into their t unics.
This point i s c onsidered in P art 2 .
A RECONSTRUCTION OF A M ILITARY TUNIC As
a n a id to t he understanding of t he design of the t unic,
two s uccessive simple r econstructions were m ade up f rom m aterial.
T he
d imensions
C onference) were 1 .15m practical
of the
( 3ft 9 in)
appreciations.
I n
m easurements of t he Nahal Hever r econstruction
were
width of 0 .90m
( 3ft),
r educed
f irst t unic
square ,
o rder
b ased
( exhibited at the o n
( lft)
v isual
and
t o f all within the m aximum
t unics,
t hose
o f
t he
s econd
t o a l ength of lm ( 3ft 3 in) and a
with s lits at the n eck of 0 .50m
and at the arms of 0 .30m
b lanket
( P1.1 4 8
and 2 ).
( lft
8 in)
I n
p assing i t s hould be noted t hat the f olds of the s econd
r econstruction ,
which was made of a thicker material,
a l esser d egree t hose s een on so many s o-called
' undress
u niform '
of
s culptures.
imitate to
I ndeed,
t he
t unic and c loak must indicate
t hat the f ormer was made of a comparatively l ight material. I t was f ound t hat when the back b unched
up ,
opening
i s
t he knot pushes t he material into a thin cone,
but
t his when f olded down and tied c losely
a round
r esembles t he depictions.
o n t he knot,
of
t he
n eck
w ith
a
L ikewise,
l eather
t hong,
the f olds c entering
and t he heavy blousing at the back of the tunic are
r eproduced well
( compare P 1.3 with F ig.4). Wilson has
s uggested
t hat the knot was s ecured by a f ibula but a thong not only s eems more practical but a lso follows the s culpture better. When
f ollowing the Chatsworth and other r eliefs by wearing
a ' pouch belt' o f
t he
strap
b lousing
( Fig.8),
o n
a ccess t o t he sword
t he
i t c an be s een to gather
r ight
( P1.4 and 5 ).
hand s ide, When the
o f room f or swinging a pick or whatever c onsidering
t he
f irst reconstruction ,
wearing
much
t unic
i s
u nknotted
there i s plenty
( P1.6).
o f
when unknotted
up
thus a llowing easy
and the r ight arm i s passed through the opening,
I n
3 6
armour over a tunic, and
material pulled f orward around the n eck,
t he
r olls
o f
the
s pare
a llowed the two l engths
o f roll t o be crossed over in the manner of a s carf worn under a l orica
s egmentata.
a ctually was a s econd,
T his
s eparate
s maller ,
r aised s carf.
d oubts
a s
H owever,
t o
n ot
whether there only
m aterial but also t he ends of s carves appear to be two
o f
t he
praetorians
on
t ie
n eck
opening
c hafing of the n eck by body m ight
e ven
t he
provide
d epicted
t he Cancelleria r elief;
would t hus be of t he order of 1 .20m p revent
d oes
r econstruction not a llow f or this crossover of
( c.4ft)
b . .N 2 oming a rmour;
l ong.
3 7
A s carf
on
a s carf would
e xcessively d irty and any i n
d iffering
c olours
i t
a d istinction between d ifferent l egions or
c ohorts.
How t he s lit o f a t unic was f astened when armour was m ust
r emain
s omething of a mystery.
p air of f ibulae t op
s houlder
( P1.7) p late
The answer may s imply be a
- this could e xplain the o f
t he
l orica
m ight a lso go some way towards accounting f or the
4 9
r ather
u nusual
s egmentata which creates a
hollow beneath i t w hich could house t he f ibulae; o f f ibulae f ound on m ilitary s ites.
worn ,
this s uggestion l arge
n umber
CONCLUSIONS T he
evidence
c learly
e arly 2 nd century A .D.
a nd
i ndicates t hat the l egionary of the of
t he
p receding
and
s ucceeding
periods wore a s leeveless tunic with a w ide neck opening capable of
a llowing
an arm to pass through so a s to bare the shoulder;
t he opening was reducible by knotting a bunch of material behind t he n eck.
The g arment was probably woollen ,
and
a t
i ts
l ower
e dge and neck opening there was a s elvage rather than a stitched hem .
A
l ength
of
c .lm ( 3ft 3 in)
a ppear to represent the order of
and a width of c .0.90m ( 3ft)
t he
m agnitude
m ilitary tunic of the early 2nd c entury A .D.
5 0
of
t he
R oman
PART 2 - COLOUR
A CATALOGUE OF THE EVIDENCE Although f or
colour
g enerals), omitted.
an a ttempt has been made to note all the evidence r elating
t here
t o
will
m ilitary
c lothing
( leaving
a side
doubtless be some items which have been
The evidence i s arranged in
c hronological
o rder
with
individual interpretations.
a )
Historical
f resco
( 3rd century B .C. Four
- a tomb on the Esquiline)
r egisters
of
c haracters being named;
f igures two
3 8
are depicted with some of the
of
t he
r egisters
s how
f ighting
taking place. I nterpretation: event
with
T he
t he
s cenes
R omans
appear
in
white
t o represent an historical t unics
and
t heir
enemies
( ?Samnites) wearing only short white kilts.
b )
Historical
( late
f resco
i st century B .C./early i st century A .D.
S tatilii) The tunics,
- the tomb of the
3 9
f resco includes a who
are winning,
battle
between
s oldiers
i n
white
and other men who are dressed only in
short white kilts. I nterpretation:
c )
The victorious
soldiers are Romans.
The Barberini N ilotic mosaic
( ?c.30 B .C. D ates 3 rd
- Palestrina) for this mosaic range
c entury
A .D. 41
offered i s the
from the time of Sulla
v isit to Egypt by Octavian after
Actium
when
N ile7
some support for this date comes
42
tesserae 43
t here and
f rom
c arried by two of t he
to
t he
but to the writer the most convincing date was t he
a
t he
Battle
of
particular abundant f looding by the presence
f igures.
from the
of
t he
s ize
of
t he
r ectangular s cuta
44
The scene at t he bottom of the mosaic 5 1
i n
an
e ye-catching
position shows a number of f igures with shields, and
body
armour
approaching
n earby to the r ight i s a war galley. horn
s pears,
helmets
t he f ront of a c lassical t emple; ' Octavian '
i s
b lowing
t o s ummon t he priestess and i mmediately behind him ,
manner of
a
bodyguard,
( ?)chainmail a uthority
a nd
an
a
v ery
i n
i s
a
s oldier
o ffwhite p ale
a ccompanied by a f igure,
t unic.
b lue
t hese
two
a
bronze
h elmet,
N ext stands a person of
t unic
and
possibly bearded,
a r ed s leeveless knotted tunic and, i n t his s cene,
i n
a
in the
moulded
c uirass
dressed apparently in
unlike any other male person
he i s not wearing any body armour; by the f eet of
f igures
who f ace one another ,
i s a dark blue shield
b earing a dolphin design. O f t he r emaining s ix soldiers, only
f our
t he two men emblem
w ith
r ed
painted
o f the s corpion.
t unic i s not v isible, helmet;
t he c olour of the tunics
a re v isible - in each case t hey are white ,
t he
r ectangular s cuta
bearing
The l eading s oldier of t hese s ix ,
wears a
r ed
c rest
on
a
o f
including t he
whose
white-coloured
other f ive soldiers have white horsehair plumes on
t heir bronze helmets. I nterpretation:
B ecause of the nearby g alley and the shield with
dolphins on i t,
the
' Octavian '
may
' officer'
b e
c onsidered
admiral) while the unarmed c learly be a
not a soldier,
n aval
praetorians l egionaries, o fficer ,
personnel. ( with
t o
p ale
b e
T he
t he
' Agrippa'
r emaining s corpion
a
c enturion.
H is
o ther
and t ransverse.
r ecall t he c umm-NL b y which
a id r ecognition.
d )
c rest ,
f ive
a re
p robably
t he s cuta)
o r
b e
an
unlike the f lowing
s oldiers,
a ppears
t o
b e
t hen t hese two
f eatures
t hat c enturions wore i ron helmets
were both s ilvered and t ransverse,
s o a s to
f resco - Pompeii) 46
T his i s a court s cene
f igures
o n
4 5
( earlier i st c entury A .D.
c ontemporary
i s
I f the white-coloured helmet can be
i i
' Judgement of S olomon'
podium
f igure
connection he may
s oldiers
e mblem
n ear
( or s ome other
but the l eading f igure with a red c rest may
p erhaps
c rests
t unic
a ccompanying
t aken to r epresent a s ilver plated one, w ith
b lue
Agrippa
( ?)bearded
but with the
horsehair plumes of the s ymmetrical
in a v ery
p ractice
and
which, d ress.
( ?Solomon plus two advisers) o f attendant soldiers;
a rguably,
a ppears
B ehind the t hree a re
a
number
t o
e cho
j udges on a o f
s hadowy
in f ront of t he podium are three
other s oldiers who are rendered in more detail. T he soldier about to c leave the b aby in half i s white
t unic
a s
i s
his
w earing
a
c ompanion i n t he background; both are 5 2
wearing bronze cuirasses and helmets.
The third f igure stands in
a pose o f authority c lose to the podium and i s dressed in a t unic
a nd
a
r ed
r ed
c loak while his c uirass and helmet appear to
have been s ilvered ,
unlike the other
t wo
s oldiers.
A ll
t hree
s oldiers have red horsehair plumes. I nterpretation:
W ith
V egetius'
r emarks
i n
m ind
( above)
f igure in r ed with s ilvered armour may be r egarded a s s ome of officer , of
t he
perhaps a c enturion.
podium
m ay
be
the s ort
The other two soldiers in f ront
c onsidered
t o be l egionaries,
or even
p raetorians.
e ) A wine s hop s ign ( earlier i st c entury A .D.
- Pompeii) 47
M ine host offers a j ug of water spear
a nd
wearing
a
t o
a
f igure
c arrying
a
y ellow-brown paenula which f alls down to
c over his arms and t unic;
he
i s
a lso
wearing
a
l ight
g reen
s carf. I nterpretation:
T he
c loaked
f igure
i s an off-duty soldier in
undress uniform .
f )
T he entry of V itellius
i nto R ome
( A .D.69 - T acitus) 48 The e agles of the praefecti
c astrorum ,
( primi c enturionum) c enturions
marched
V itellian t he
a rmy
t ribunes
were
and
p receded
by
t he
t he s enior c enturions
dressed in c andida v este, with t heir c enturies,
while
t he
o ther
their arms and medals
g leaming. I nterpretation: officers
This special mention by Tacitus
i ndicates t hat their normal perhaps
o f
t he
s enior
o f the l egions being dressed in shining white probably r ed
u niform
above i s c orrect.
On the other hand,
t heir c lothing had been specially a lthough t his
s uggestion s eems
t he
c enturions
j unior
s ilvered crests, of t he P ompeii
was
a
d ifferent
c olour,
i f t he interpretation of the evidence of c )
a gain
whitened
l ess
and d )
the r eference may mean that l ikely.
r ecalls
f or
t he
o ccasion ,
The g leaming arms of
Vegetius'
m ention
o f
and the s ilver colour of t he cuirass and helmet
' centurion '
( above).
5 3
g )
P apyrus r eceipt f or t unics and c loaks
( A.D.128 - Socnupaei Nesus,
Arsinoite nome) 49
T he v illage weavers had delivered n ineteen tunics for g uards',
and
f ive
s erving in Judaea' I nterpretation:
h )
white c loaks
' the
' for the needs of the soldiers
to the collectors of public c lothing.
S ee 1 ) below.
Antonine Wall d istance s lab
( c.A .D.142 - Bridgeness)
5°
T he s culptured s cene on the r ight shows a pouring a l ibation on an altar. v exillarius,
a
man
i n
a
t oga
Behind him and to his l eft are a
i n a paenula and s carf,
who has been defaced;
m an
and a third f igure
on this l ast f igure there
a re
t races
o f
r ed paint on the cloak. I nterpretation:
In the l ight of the evidence already r eviewed,
s oldier
r ed
i n
a
c loak
m ight
b e
c onstrued
a s
c enturion ,
but on the other hand the r ed paint may
r epresent
an
o utline
on
a yellow-brown cloak ,
with many depictions of c lothes of
t his
a
a possible more
l ikely
a s i s the case
c olour
i n
N orth-West
E urope • 51
U
C hurch parade of C ohors XX P almyrenorum
( earlier 3 rd century A .D. T he
c entre
o f
- Dura Europos)
t his
5 2
f resco i s occupied by t he v exillarius
wearing a dark yellow-brown c loak and t he unit's who
i s
pouring
a
l ibation
u pon an a ltar;
white c loak with purple f ringes.
t hese m en
y ellow-brown c loaks;
c loaks of a darker hue,
t he f igures white
s even
of
whom
a re
wearing
the e ighth has a white c loak.
f igures but in an upper r egister are some w ith
t ribune
To the r ight i s a double row of
e ight f igures of some distinction , l ight
n amed
the l atter wears a
in t he s cene a re
f ourteen
o ther
which appear t o be hairy.
b areheaded,
t unics with l ong s leeves
Behind
u narmed
and
All
wearing
( and with some purple decorative
s tripes). I nterpretation:
The f resco i s
e ight
i n
f igures
c enturions a pparent
and f iner
f airly
s elf
e xplanatory
-
t he
t he l ower r egister may be interpreted a s t he
d ecurions c loaks
and
o f
t his
p art-mounted
u nit.
T heir
t heir portrait f aces contrast with
t hose of their soldiers behind them . 5 4
j )
S oldier and g oddess
f resco
( earlier 3 rd century A .D.
- Dura Europos)
On t he s ame wall a s the w ith
a n
a pparently
' church parade'
i n
a
i s
a nother
f resco
m ilitary f igure with one hand on his sword
f ace-to-face with a ' goddess'. d ressed
5 3
white tunic
T he
f ormer
who
i s
presumably
( the text does not g ive the colour),
w ears a r ed cloak. I nterpretation: The soldier i s p robably c olour of his c loak perhaps a c enturion .
k )
' Chapel'
f ew
s oldiers, f ar
o n
t he
5 4
b attered surviving f ragments appear to depict two
one of whom wears a helmet,
has been s uggested, i s
o fficer,
f resco
( c.A .D.200-38 - C astellum D immidi) The
a n
f rom
and a third f igure who,
i s pouring a l ibation on an a ltar ,
c ertain.
T his
t unic with l ong s leeves and
but
it
t his
l ast f igure i s dressed in a white a
blue-grey
( 'gris-bleu')
c loak.
T here i s a purple edging to the n eck of his tunic and he wears a r ed baldric. I nterpretation: c ommander , s word
T he
t hird
f igure
i s
probably the garrison 's
e ither a tribune or a c enturion.
a nd
of
a
helmeted
The
presence
o f
a
s oldier must s urely indicate t hat a
l ibation i s not t aking place.
1 )
P apyrus r eceipt f or a tunic and a c loak
( A .D.285 - Arsinoite nome)
5 5
T his i s a r eceipt f rom t he c loaks'
' controllers of tunics and white
t o the l eaders of a v illage f or t he delivery of a
t unic
a nd a c loak. I nterpretation:
B oth
s imilar c ircumstances r eference
s eem
m ilitary
P iazza Armerina c loaks
c olour. At f irst ,
t he
i n Greek
l eave no room f or manoeuvre, c ollecting
s ome
( g) 1 50
above)
of white c loaks
y ears
e arlier
and
in
t his
t o go against a ll t he p ictorial evidence which,
i ncluding Luxor, t hat
t he mention b ut
officials
and
g eneral
B one s hould
words pallion
( below), be
i ndicates
y ellow-brown in
l eukon,
a ppear
t o
but the wording of the title of the
s uggests
t hat
5 5
' white
c loaks'
( not j ust
' cloaks') u ndyed
could be a technical term ,
wool
which
c ould
p erhaps m eaning
c loaks
o f
be of varied l ight c olours. With the
white tunics shown at Dura,
D immidi and e lsewhere ,
i t would s eem
l ikely that the tunics in t he two receipts were a lso white which m akes t he term
' white c loaks'
even more puzzling if
t he
c olour
i s meant to be an a ccurate description .
m )
Egyptian t emple f rescos
( A .D.284-305 - Luxor) The
f rescos,
5 6
which were badly damaged when f ound,
d epict a
number of scenes of soldiers wearing the distinctive l ate d ecoration
o n their tunics.
s ix horses and f ive soldiers who a ll wear f or
o ne
man
who
i s
white
d ressed in a r ed tunic.
a rmed with spears and s hields but there i s no c loaks;
t he
s cene
i s
o f
emperors,
which
a re
b orders
p ainted
two
e xcept s ign
t hey
a ppear
t o
be
a rmed,
an
f acing
o f
On the
a pse
r egisters
standing in straight l ines and
not
c ertain o n
s oldiers each, d o
t unics
The soldiers are
obviously not a ' church parade'.
adjoining wall to the r ight , d epictions
p atch
One wall has painted on i t a t l east
with
o f four f orwards;
b ut wear white t unics and
yellow-brown cloaks. A third s cene depicts t he l ower parts unarmed
men
i n
y ellow-brown
white
c loaks;
m ushroom-shaped
o r
o ne
off-white f igure
o r
a
end and may be an officer.
b lack
t unic
f our
t unics
holds
f resco shows a commanding f igure advancing, g rey
o f
a nd
a pparently y ellow
s taff
with
o r a
The f ourth s urviving dressed
i n
a
d ark
and a yellow-brown cloak with a thin red
l ine r unning close to and parallel to t he * lower edge; behind him a re two other f igures. I nterpretation:
In the horses s cene the
o ne
f igure
i n
t unic i s to be r emarked on and presumably i s an officer , a decurion . s tances
n )
r ed
The other three scenes are of unarmed soldiers whose
r ecall the parade s cene f rom D ura.
y ellow-brown
a
perhaps
( or yellow)
The white tunics and
c loaks are now f amiliar company.
The g reat hunt mosaic
( c. A .D.300 - P iazza Armerina) To f ollow in v isual
g eneral
5 7
t he
e xposition
C arandini,
t he
c entre of t he mosaic r epresents I taly which i s c onnected
on t he l eft to Carthage and on the r ight t o g alleys,
o f
e ach
w ith
A lexandria
b y
two
a gangplank l et down f rom t he bow on I taly
and another gangplank l et down f rom the s tern in the
5 6
r espective
N orth African ports; I ndia.
T he
to the f ar r ight i s a third boat berthed in
hinterland
o f
a nimals being hunted and
t he ports i s c overed with s cenes of
c aptured,
while
t he
g angplanks
a re
c rowded with animals being taken on their way to I taly. W ith mosaic,
well over 7 0 human f igures depicted on this very l ong
i t i s not possible to g ive a detailed description of the
s cenes in t he space available.
For ease
o f
d iscussion
v arious
a reas of the mosaic are treated s eparately. T o
t he
r ight
o f the African gangplank of the middle ship
t here are 2 5 f igures on f oot, c arters.
For
5 8
t he
of whom two
a re
obviously
l ocal
twenty r emaining f igures where i t has been
possible to a scertain the colour of the t unics, they a re white o r o ff-white ( with t he u sual l ate d ecorative p atches). E ffectively a ll of these twenty
have
a
r ed,
o r
mostly
r ed ,
c ingulum , while s even sport a r ed baldric and s even others carry s hields,
one
o f
which
has
l egion XX Valeria Victrix, c loaks.
a running boar,
painted on i t;
T here are a lso three horsemen ,
o ff-white
t unics,
while
t he
the emblem of the
f ive wear yellow-brown
two of whom wear white or
c olour
o f
t he
t hird
i s
not
i n
t he
a scertainable. I nterpretation:
C arandini
i s
t o
be
f ollowed
i dentification of these men in white a s soldiers who were u sed f or c atching animals f or the games. On
t he l eft hand ship two f igures in l ight blue tunics are
a ttending to the r igging ,
while another f igure i n a r ed tunic i s
h elping to ease an antelope on board. s hip
o ften
5 9
I n t he bows of the
m iddle
a f igure in a r ed tunic i s e ither a ttending to the r igging
o r adjusting a l ine attached to t he gangplank; f igures,
in the stern
two
one in a dark blue tunic and t he other in a white one,
a re helping to haul on board an e lephant. I nterpretation: a s
The two f igures in l ight blue must
b e
r egarded
s ailors while t he f igure in dark blue might a lso be r egarded
a s a s ailor with his darker tunic perhaps indicating a r anking.
S tarr
n otes
c entury with both a centurion and p resumes
t hat
t he
f ormer
a t rierarchus
v essel
o f
( captain)
and
s hould have r ank over the l atter.
W ith t he earlier evidence in mind the f igure e ach
s ign
t hat e ach warship was c onsidered to be a
i n
r ed
o n
6°
board
m ay be s een a s the ship's c enturion and the f igure
i n dark b lue as t he t rierarchus. On t he African gangplank of the l eft hand two
f igures
y ellow ,
i n
l ight
b lue
t unics,
one
s hip
while on t he middle ship 's African gangplank
two l ight blue tunics and t hree white ones.
5 7
t here
a re
i n white and one in t here
a re
I nterpretation:
Again ,
the men in l ight blue tunics may be s een
a s s ailors and t hose in white a s soldiers, l oad
t he
on
t ogether
t o
board.
T he
m an in the y ellowy t unic i s
p robably a port worker - there
a re
t hree
I talian
animals
working
g angplanks.
I t
i s
r emarkable
o thers t hat
on
a ll
t he
two
t he f igures
d epicted in l ight blue tunics are e ither on board a ship o r on a g angplank. I taly , f light
or c ould i t be S icily ,
of
t he v illa. s tanding
l ies i n
f ront
of
t he
I mmediately to the r ight a bove
t he
spot
where
of t he
t he two
c entre
point
I talian
r ed c ingulum ,
a
l ight
blue
c loak
a nd
a
c arrying a staff with a mushroom-shaped end, t he spectator.
his
and
r ight
P annonian hat , l ooks
I nterpretation:
a
v ery l ight yellow tunic,
l eft ,
g lancing sideways at his
t here
d iffident f igure,
t he
appears
and
d irectly
a t
t o
be
i n
stands behind f ace,
w hile
t he remains of a s imilar
B ecause t he man in the l ight blue
t he owner of the v illa. t he
c loak
i s
i n
he may well be
The colour of his tunic matches t hat
P alestrina
o f
mosaic and the l ight blue of his
c loak e choes the colour of the s ailors a ttending the r igging. i s obviously a person of substance and may well be o f
t he M isene f leet.
o fficer and ,
perhaps,
t he
a ' ship's c enturion '.
b een s o badly damaged, i n c olour which makes t hese
a reas,
a nimal
have
l ittle of these areas have been published
including the I talian g angplanks,
a ttenders,
s hown a s porters. by
' Italy '
i t d ifficult to comment on t hem in d etail.
l east s ix. F igures in yellow tunics, a nd
He
p refect
His two attending f igures could be an army
B ecause the l eft hand s ide of the mosaic and
I n
a
probably wearing a r ed c loak or tunic.
e ffective v isual centre point of t he mosaic,
' Agrippa'
t unic,
Another f igure s imilarly d ressed but with a c loak
y ellow-brown
t his man and to his on
and
g angplanks
c onverge i s a f igure dressed in a l ong v ery pale blue
o f
w ide
s teps l eading f rom the corridor into t he basilica of
acting a s
there are at
porters,
c arters
while two f igures in r ed t unics are also
A third f igure in a r ed t unic i s being
a man in a white tunic,
r ed c ingulum ,
b eaten
and yellow-brown c loak
a nd carrying a s taff with a mushroom-shaped end. I nterpretation: c ivilians; N ahal
m en
i n
y ellow
o nes
published
a s
m ay
b e
c oloured
p lates.
6 1
i n r ed t unics pose problems of i nterpretation ,
m ight o n
s een
a s
T he t hree a lthough
be c onstrued as a c enturion being beaten by a s enior
o fficer f or dereliction of duty , d oubt
t unics
the yellow of t he tunics i s r eminiscent of s ix of the
H ever
f igures o ne
T he
t he
their presence must t hrow
' ship's c enturion '
interpretation.
t he shade of r ed i s a d eciding f actor.
5 8
s ome
I t may be that
o ) A wild animal hunt mosaic ( end 3 rd c entury A .D.
- Bone,
Algeria)
6 2
A l ine of men i nvisible behind their r ed shields f orm o f
a t rap into which animals are being herded.
who has been knocked down by a l eopard,
i s wearing a white tunic
a s are two other f igures on foot and two on horseback, c arrying
a
brace
s hades of brown;
p art
One of t hese men a ll
f our
o f spears e ach and wearing cloaks of various
two a lso wear a r ed c ingulum.
I nterpretation: As with t he P iazza Armerina mosaic soldiers b eing e mployed of white t unics.
a s beaters,
p ) Mosaic of soldiers
f ighting
( ?early 4th century A .D. The mosaic d epicts s oldiers
w ith
- R ielves, i n
t he
o val shields,
6 3
c entral
panel
two
p airs
o f
yellow tops
( ?scale
armour)
and
One pair i s f ighting and the other i s shaking hands.
I nterpretation: white tunics,
B ecause
a ll
and
f our
f igures l ook a like and wear
the s cene may celebrate the peaceful s ettlement of
a c ivil war between the two a rmour
Spain)
a ll f our being identically d ressed
i n s hort s leeved white tunics, helmets.
a re
wearing the by now f amiliar uniform
t unics
l ooks
R oman
a rmies.
T he
s tyle
o f
t o be of a much earlier date ,
t he
and i s
c ertainly not g ladiatorial.
q )
C andidati duplares and s implares
( unknown date - Vegetius)
6 4
At t he end of a l ong l ist t he
l egion
a re
s oldiers
p erform munera
l ikely
p rotected a re
by
p rivileges,
c alled munifices
( ?immunes)
t he
because they have to
and a s t hey are excused f atigues,
l owly
i t would s eem
t hat their t unics stayed cleaner t han t he munifices. boys',
s lang
word,
' the
The l ily
being eventually incorporated into official u se a s
was t he word papilio c ase
whereas
The d uplares and s implares obviously hold
t erm c andidati could t hen be s een a s a white
o f
( services).
I nterpretation: r anks
( 'officers')
a re the c andidati d uplares and c andidati s implares.
T he principales r emaining
o f principales
( butterfly)
f or a tent.
6 5
Alternatively ,
a
m ight be made f or the munifices wearing non-White c lothing
f or part of the t ime at l east when doing f atigues. 5 9
Naval uniforms ( date unknown - Vegetius) Vegetius mentions were
painted
waves,
in
6 6
that scout ships
the
c olour,
of
venetus
t he
British
f leet
which he l ikened to the
and that their soldiers and sailors wore clothes
o f
t he
s ame colour. I nterpretation: the
blue
The
f action ,
g reeny-blue.
colour, c an
venetus,
perhaps
which was also applied to
be
envisaged
The special mention of this
was not that in normal usage,
a s
a
dark
colour suggests that it
but it still might
j ust be related
to the blue tunics at P iazza Armerina.
GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS L egionary tunics Without
doubt
the
evidence
l egionaries of the early d ressed
in
white
2 nd
tunics,
c learly
c entury
on
s oldiers'
undyed
wool colours.
or variants on them , that
t he
earlier
t hat the have
been
g leaming
white,
probably
I t i s not however clear whether
tunics would have had clavi.
on soldiers prior to the
s hould
although the shade i s more l ikely to
have been an off-white rather than a based
indicates
A .D.
There
l ate 3rd century,
i s no s ign of these
but thereafter c lavi,
are generally to be s een. l egionaries
This
could
imply
d id in f act have c lavi on their
tunics. The only possible clue comes mosaic
playing. knees, pass
f rom the
Z ilten
All
t hree
with c lavi, a s
are dressed in white tunics g irt above the
and yellow-brown paenulae
s oldiers;
a
yellow
shows,
I n
these
musicians
of
amphitheatre 6 7
t he t hree t he by
l ight
of
f igures l egion s upporting
and
t he
e asily
been placed l eft
o f
t he
m ight I II
perhaps
Augusta
t he
l ady
be
i nterpreted
a s
helping out at a l ocal o rganist
who
i s
a lso
it might seem unlikely that an amphitheatre could f ind at 2 nd
The
l ack
of c lavi
on
t he
P alestrina and Pompeii may simply be the removal of
minor detail by the artists. i st
could
has
t he activities at modern f etes and
f ull time employment for musicians. f igures
and
painted s cutum
indicatively against a herm j ust a l ittle to tubicen.
shown;
g ladiatorial
( 2nd century A .D.) where a t ubicen and two cornicines are
The question of c lavi on tunics
c entury soldiers must however
unproven.
6 0
of
l ie on the table as
C loaks W ith the exception of the two Egyptian papyri r eferring white
c loaks,
t he
y ellow-brown
v ariety
a ppears
t o
t o
be
a
ubiquitous garment f or the ordinary soldier and even on occasion f or officers. d epictions E urope,
Wild has
o f
c ivilian
t hey
' are
y ellowish-orange'. l ife
n oted
t hat
c oats,
p ainted
where
c olour
s urvives
o n
s carves and capes in north-west
without
e xception
yellow
o r
He s uggests that the colours would be t rue to
i f t hey r epresented shades of undyed woo1.
This could be
6 8
a llowed t o retain most of i ts natural oils in o rder to make such a g arment warm and f airly waterproof.
C enturions'
uniforms
T he i dentification of the possible c enturions at Palestrina and P ompeii by their s ilvered helmets and touches of r ed o ut
t wo
points.
A
r ed
t unic,
d istinguish a centurion f rom his d ay-to-day e xamined,
a ctivities. three
c loak and crest would help to m en
S econdly,
( Palestrina ,
both
o f
i n
t he
r ed
t unics
Pompeii and Luxor)
f or r eligious ceremonies, ( and
and
' crowd'
i n
scenes
a ll have one man
The l ack of one
o r
a t t he Dura church parade may only imply that
and f or s pecial events c enturions
b attle
f ive
i n r ed among the many white tuniced f igures. more
brings
when n either arms nor armour are worn ,
( e.g.
o ther
t he
V itellian
o fficers)
c oloured uniforms i n order
t o
put
a ssume
e ntry
i nto
R ome)
a side their s pecial r ed t he
white
t unic
of
a
c itizen . At
P iazza
c enturions', c ould
b e
Armerina,
l eaving
there does not appear to be a
t hought
t o
b e a centurion ,
c enturions dressed d ifferently. t o
e nvisage
' Naval tunics'
t he
f igure
two i n
' ship's r ed
I t i s an attractive
f ragile;
who
hat date but perhaps by t p roposition
( and probably decurions a s well)
c enturions
u niforms but the evidence i s under
a side
in r ed
enturions s ee also ship s c
below.
N aval t unics B efore considering the uniforms of naval personnel, u seful
t o
r ecall U lpian 's d ictum ,
s ailors are soldiers'.
I t
6 9
has
a lready
l ight blue tunics s ignify s ailors, ( perhaps t he t rierarchus) m ight
a lso
hold
t he
v enetus coloured c lothes
i t
i s
' in the f leet a ll rowers and b een
s uggested
t hat
dark blue ones naval officers
and a r ed one the ship 's centurion who
s enior
c ommand,
f or ships'
6 1
while Vegetius mentions
c rews.
This s uggestion f inds P iazza
Armerina ,
s upport
which
m iniature galleys.
d epicts
f rom
another
c herubs
m osaic
f rom
f rom
f our
f ishing
There are three cherubs in e ach ship ,
but
i n
t he case of one of them only the head s urvives. Apart f rom three c herubs
e ither naked or in l oin c loths,
blue tunic in e ach ship t he
g alleys
have
there i s one in a l ight
( in one instance,
an oarsman).
Three
a c herub in a red t unic a s a c entral f igure
( ?in command) while the f inal cherub wears a d ark blue I f,
a s proposed above,
f leet,
o f
t unic.
7°
the owner of the v illa was prefect of t he
then i t i s plausible to s ee the cherubs being depicted in
t he correctly coloured t unics in t his d roll mosaic. The
c oncept
o f a ship's c enturion wearing a r ed tunic not
only would mirror the possible uniform of an army c enturion ,
but
a lso would explain the presence of the unarmed f igure in
r ed
t unic
n ext to
' Agrippa'
in the Pälestrina mosaic;
c ould have a bodyguard or attendant,
if
a
' Octavian '
t hen so could ' Agrippa',
a
c enturion f rom his f leet. I n
passing
awarded Agrippa a ction
off
d escribe the
i t
i s
of
a v exillum
i nterest
t o
r ecall that Augustus
c oloured b äe 'ruleus
a
n aval
which
( ?Mediterranean)
i s perhaps best t ranslated a s
s ea,
was
a fter
S icily./ 1 C aeruleus,
s ometimes used to
a m id-blue. The r emarkable, f act
but perhaps i n tetrospect
n ot
s urprising,
i s t hat a ll the evidence r elating to the various shades of
t he colour blue in a g eneral military context r efers only t o the n avy , a s
r ather than to the army.
t o
when and
t o
s peculate
t he troops of the two Adiutrix l egions changed the
c olour of t heir tunics, l egio,
I t i s entertaining
whether
perhaps w hen each
a ny
c olour
r etained in their n ew uniforms,
u nit
b ecame
a i usta
t race Of their naval past was
perhaps a blue n eck s carf.
Auxiliary t unics The appearance of the Cohort XX P almyrenorum t he
soldiers
f rom
D immidi and Luxor)
held t o indicate that auxiliaries A .D.
a lso
wore that colour.
c omes
f rom Arrian
in
c olour
well
a s
t he
f irst
t wo
c enturies
Some support f or s uch a contention
( c.131-7) when he states that c avalry t roopers
on special parades wore t unics of s carlet , bright
( as
in white tunics m ight be
w ith
b lond/yellow
l ong
hyacinth
o r
another
f lowing plumes.
7 2
T his
s tatement c ould be s een a s implying that t he t roopers wore white t unics on normal occasions. However, c itizenship
i t may be argued t hat o n
a ll
before
t he
c onferring
o f
f ree inhabitants of the Empire i n A .D.212,
and probably even earlier ,
there would 6 2
have
been
a
c all
f or
d istinguishing
marks
c itizen c ohorts,
b etween t roops of the l egions and the f ew
and the g reat bulk of non-citizen
a uxiliaries;
t his might have been achieved by not a llowing the l atter to wear white
t unics.
I ndeed,
i f the principle of raising new cohorts
was s imply t o enlist a suitable number of l ocal warriors, w ith
t heir
own
weapons,
and add some officers,
e xpect l ocal traditional colours appearing. n otes
t hat
For example,
i n f our named t ribes of northern Spain
d ress in blackl
which
7 3
c ould
m ean ,
f or
o ften
then one might S trabo
' all the men
i nstance,
t hat
t he
v arious A sturian c ohorts and a lae wore black tunics. The g eneral l ack of evidence f orbids an attempt to make any worthwhile conclusion ,
but the f uture may be more yielding.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I should l ike to express my g ratitude to Alan Micklethwaite f or
t he l ine drawings,
John Eagle for the photographs and P eter
Johnson f or advice on the Palestrina mosaic. t o
a cknowledge
t he
debt
I should a lso
l ike
owed to Lilian Wilson f or the ground
work on t he s ubject in the chapter on t unics in her The C lothing o f t he Ancient R omans.
NOTES 1 .
KAHLER ,
1965,
Taf.6,
2 .
BANDINELLI,
3 .
P IDAL,
4 .
R USSELL ROBINSON ,
5 .
G ellius,
6 .
GRIMAL ,
1 963,
p1.44.
7 .
GRIMAL ,
1 963,
p 1.43.
8 .
S TRONG ,
1 923,
t ay.XLITI.
9 .
GRIMAL,
1 963,
p 1.90.
1 0.
Quintilian ,
1 1.
W ILSON ,
1 970,
1 982,
1 4,
1 8 & 1 9.
p1.53.
f ig.76.
Noct.
Act.,
I nst.
1 938,
1 975,
p1.200.
V I,xii,3.
Orat.,
XI,138.
pl.XLII.
6 3
1 2.
GRIMAL,
1963,
p1.82.
1 3.
GRIMAL ,
1963,
p1.86.
1 4. WHITE ,
1970,
1 5.
Cato,
Agri.
1 6.
Varro ,
1 7.
W ILSON ,
1 8.
PARLASCA ,
p1.1,
2 ,
C ult.,
Ling.
2 6,
2 7,
2 8,
etc.
5 9.
Lat.,
1938,
19,
I X ,79,47.
5 7.
1 969-80,
e .g.2,
tay.205,
f ig.1 & 2 ( Antonine).
l atter which comes f rom Hawara and very stitching Museum ,
on
t he
s houlder,
Egyptian Galleries,
i s Room
c learly
s hows
the t he
o n d isplay in the British 6 2
( NG
2 912);
s houlder
s titching continues into the 4th c entury. 1 9.
BANDINELLI,
2 0. ALFÖLDY ,
1 971,
1 974,
p1.175.
p1.19.
2 1.
YADIN ,
1963,
2 04-19.
2 2.
YADIN ,
1963,
2 04.
2 3. YADIN ,
1963,
2 13.
2 4.
MAIURI,
1953,
1 47.
2 5.
YADIN ,
1963,
2 05.
2 6.
YADIN ,
1963,
2 12-9.
2 7.
PFISTER & BELLINGER ,
1945,
1 4,
2 8.
C ICHORIUS,
1 900
- in this article the s cenes have
1 896
&
1 7-9.
been identified by t heir cast numbers. 2 9.
STRONG ,
1923,
f ig.179.
3 0.
STRONG ,
1 923,
f ig.125.
3 1.
JONES ,
1974,
3 55-7.
3 2.
JONES ,
1974,
3 55.
3 3.
B ISHOP,
3 4.
Quintilian ,
1983,
p1.4 & f ig.l.
I nst.
Orat.,
XI,138. 6 4
3 5.
Suetonius,
Augustus,
3 6.
WILSON ,
3 7.
BANDINELLI,
1 970,
p1.236.
3 8.
BANDINELLI,
1 970,
1 15
3 9.
BANDINELLI,
1 970,
1 18-9 & p1.121.
4 0.
The description of the military scene has been drawn from
1938,
6 5.
s ite
postcard
best
s ource
photograph
XXIV ,2.
( E. f or
of
& p1.117.
R ichter, c olour
t he
Roma),
r eproduction.
s cene occurs
but the quality of the colour is recent
r eproduction
appears
in BOWMAN,
appears
in f ig.l.
4 1.
WHITEHOUSE,
4 2.
BONNEAU,
4 3.
1976,
1964 ,
but
a
which appears to be the A
in BECATTI, v ery
poor.
much
l arger
1968,
f ig.259,
A
much
more
small and again with poor colour,
1986,
f ig.45
&
7 1;
t he
whole
mosaic
4 .
9 3-4.
The size of the tesserae indicates an early date which could be compatible with the Augustan era - pers.
comm .
f rom Peter
Johnson. 4 4.
The incidence of depictions of the curved rectangular s cutum suggest that it f irst appeared in the
4 5.
Vegetius,
Milit.,
1 1,13
&
1 6;
l ater i st century B .C.
the early 1 7th century Dal
Pozzo detailed pen and ink drawing of this red crest
a s
half-circle
being and
of
crests - WHITEHOUSE, 4 6.
VANAGS, soldier
1983,
1 16;
about
apparently a
1900,
4 8.
Tacitus,
a detail of the scene,
2 20 & pl.III.
4 9.
JOHNSON et a l.,
5 0.
CLARKE et al.,
5 1.
WILD,
Hist.,
1968,
1 1,89. 1915, 1980,
in
a
f ig.13c.
1 10. GUSMAN,
s haped
quite different design to the other
1976,
t o cleave the baby,
4 7.
scene depicts the
t ransverse,
2 36-7. 1 5.
2 19.
6 5
appears
which
shows
in MAIURI,
t he 1953,
5 2.
CUMONT ,
1 926,
pl.L.
5 3.
CUMONT ,
1 926,
1 16-7 & pl.LIII.
5 4.
P ICARD ,
1 947,
1 59-72.
5 5.
CRAWFORD ,
5 6.
W ILKINSON ,
1 955,
3 9-40.
1 859,
p l.XXX-XXXII
f .51-62;
( B
& W );
MONNERET
D E
t he horses,
including the f igure in r ed,
c olour
BANDINELLI,
i n
V ILLARD ,
1 971,
p 1.266,
( f.51)
a ppears
5 7.
occur in BOWMAN ,
CARANDINI e t a l., 1 21,
1 22,
2 10,
2 20-1,
1 986,
1982,
1 25 & 1 29,
( f.51 &
f ig.34.
9 4-103,
I 11.1,
and pl.XXIII;
2 23 & 2 26-7.
f ig.12-8 ,
1 15,
1 18,
GENTILI & EDWARDS,
1957,
These colour plates cover t he great
majority of the s cenes in the centre and r ight hand s ide t he
mosaic;
only
o ne
and
t he
other,
b ut
a lso
r eproductions. 5 8.
CAR A NDINI e t a l.,
1982,
1 02.
5 9.
CARANDINI e t a l.,
1982,
1 01-2 & 9 4-5.
6 0.
STARR ,
1941,
5 5-61.
6 1.
YADIN ,
1 963,
p1.64-6.
6 2.
HADAS e t a l.,
6 3.
BLAZQUEZ,
1 966,
1 982,
6 5.
MACMULLEN ,
6 6.
Vegetius,
6 7.
WOOD & WHEELER ,
6 8.
WILD,
6 9.
Ulpian ,
7 0.
CARANDINI
46-7 - the plate i s reversed.
7 3 & l am .50.
M ilit., 1 963,
1 1,7. 1 67.
M ilit.,
1 968,
o f
there are however problems of colour shades not
b etween
6 4. Vegetius,
i n
while the whole s cene
t ogether with t he one with two registers of soldiers 5 2)
1 953,
the l eft hand half of the s cene with
IV ,37.
1 966,
p1.18.
2 19.
D ig.,
3 7,13.
e t a l.,
1 982,
pl.XXIII.
6 6
with
o ther
7 1.
Suetonius,
Augustus,
XXV ,3.
7 2.
Arrian ,
Tact.,
3 5,3.
7 3.
Strabo ,
Geog.,
3 ,3,7.
ADDENDUM While
this
a rticle was
g ood t ranslation f rom ( B.G.U. Jones
1 564),
t he
which
i s
in press,
Greek
of
The papyrus, f rom
8 3
were
t o
l ooking,
c ubits
w ith
( 1.326m;
4ft 7 in) wide, 1 985,
t he
compulsory
including a tunic
be
without d iscolouration, g ood
of
purchase
made
of
' fine,
soft,
no
imperfections'.
4ft 4 in)
well
s elvaged,
The tunic was
long and 3 cubits,
4
in
pure white wool to be
f ingers
( 1.6kg;
3
( 1.40m;
3 .61bs)
( LEWIS,
1 74-5). a : Side
the
colour
and
t he c lavi,
the
specification might well have been used to describe f rom
Nahal
Hever.
strengthened,
the
of
for the soldiers
well and tightly woven ,
and its weight 3 .75 minae
Leaving
i s
A .D.138 l isted by
weavers of the village of Philadelphia ,
s pecifies that the items, C appadocia ,
papyrus
references.
in referring to
t he
t he
the only one of the sources
not t ranslated in the actual
g arments
the writer came across a
pictorial
c enturies weight
of
the
the
tunics
lack of reference to c lavi s eems to support that
s oldiers
i n
t he
i st
d id not have them on their tunics. t unic
1 .25kg/2.751bs
the
While the general argument over white tunics
e vidence
A . D.
g eneral
of
at the
1 .6kg/3.21bs s econd
and
compares
r econstruction.
with The
d imensions are hard to reconcile with those of Cato and Nahal
H ever
u nless
r eached
c ivilians
( e.g.
t he
tunic's at
t he
e ither it was destined for a very tall and
broad chested soldier or ungirt,
2 nd
The specified
soldiers normally had tunics which when
t heir GRIMAL,
ankles, 1963,
a s
was
t he
c ase
with
some
p1.86 and 9 2).
B IBLIOGRAPHY ALFÖLDY 1974: BANDINELLI
G .
Alföldy,
1 970:
R .B.
Roman Art to A .D.200, BANDINELLI
1971:
R .B.
Art A . D.200-400, BECATTI
1 968:
G .
Noricum ,
( London 1974)
B andinelli,
Rome,
the C entre of P ower:
( London 1970)
Bandinelli,
Rome,
the Late
Empire:
Roman
( London 1971) B ecatti,
The Art of Ancient Greece and Rome,
6 7
( London 1968) B ISHOP
1 983:
M .C.
B ishop,
' The
r econsidered',
Transactions
Archaeological
Society,
BLAZQUEZ
1 982:
Academia Cuenca
J .M.
de
3 4,
the
1983,
B lazquez,
l a
Camomile
of
C iudad
Romanos R eal,
( Corpus de Mosaicos de E spana,
BONNEAU 1964: BOWMAN 1986:
D .
Bonneau,
A .K.
Egypt
s oldier M iddlesex
After
d e
Toledo,
Fasc.V),
La Crue du Nil,
Bowman ,
and
3 1-48
Mosaicos
Historia,
S treet
London
l a
R eal
Madrid y
( Madrid 1982)
( Paris 1964). the
P haraohs,
( London
R icci
de Vos,
1986) CARANDINI
e t
al.
Filosofiana, C ICHORIUS
1 982:
1 896
&
Traianssäule, CRAWFORD
A .
Carandini,
A .
The Villa of P iazza Armerina, 1 900:
C .
C ichorius,
& M .
( Palermo 1982)
D ie
R eliefs
der
( Berlin 1 896 & 1900)
1955:
D .S .
Crawford
( ed.),
P apyri
M ichaelidae,
Doura-Europos
( 1922-1923),
( Aberdeen 1955) CUMONT 1926: ( Paris GENTILI in
F .
Fouilles de
1926)
&
EDWARDS
1957:
1 ,600-year-old
Magazine, GRIMAL 1963: GUSMAN
Cumont,
CXI:2, P .
1 900:
c olor
1957,
Grimal, P .
G . V.
Gentili & D . pictures',
Edwards, National
' Roman l ife Geographic
2 11-29
The
Gusman ,
C ivilisation of Rome, Pompeii:
The C ity,
( London 1963)
i ts LIfe and Art,
( London 1900) HADAS et a l.
1966:
M .
Imperial
Rome,
( Amsterdam 1966)
JOHNSON e t
al.
( eds.),
JONES 1974:
Romans
de M .
Manchester, A .H. M.
al.
H .
I I,
Jones,
1 980:
in S cotland,
KAHLER 1965: Paullus
J .
Johnson ,
Catalogue of the Greek
Library,
CLARKE et
1915:
Hadas and the Editors of T IME-LIFE
Kähler,
in D elphi,
V .
Martin and A .S.
P apyri in
t he
John
Hunt,
Rylands
( Manchester 1915)
The Roman E conomy,
D .V.
Books,
Clarke,
D .J.
( Oxford 1 974)
Breeze & G .
Mackay,
The
( Edinburgh 1980) D er Fries vom R eiterdenkmal des Aemilius ( Berlin 1965)
6 8
LEWIS 1 985: 1 985)
N .
MACMULLEN 1 963:
L ewis,
R .
Roman Empire, MAIURI
1 953:
MacMullen ,
Maiuri,
Mass.
The Great Centuries of P ainting:
U .
Monneret de Villard,
Imperial Cult at Luxor',
PARLASCA 1 969-80:
K .
Parlasca,
Archaeologia,
R itratti
d 'Arte dell'Egitto greco-romano, P FISTER
&
BELLINGER
1 945:
R .
P ICARD
d i
Roman
' The Temple of
XCV ,
1 953,
Mummie
s er.B,
P fister
E xcavations at D ura E uropos: Textiles
Later
1 963)
( Lausanne 1953)
MONNERET DE VILLARD 1 953: t he
( Oxford
S oldier and C ivilian in the
( Cambridge,
A .
P ainting,
L ife in Egypt under Roman R ule,
1-3), &
85-105
( Repertorio
( Rome 1969-80)
L .
F inal R eport IV ,
B ellinger,
The
P art
The
I I,
( New Haven 1 945)
1 947:
G .C.
P icard,
Castellum D immidi,
( Algiers
& Paris
1 947) P IDAL 1982:
R . M.
Romana, R USSELL
P idal,
vol.II
ROBINSON
I mperial S TARR 1 941:
S TRONG
de J .C. H .
I I
- 4 14 de J .C.),
Russell
R obinson ,
-
E spana
( Madrid 1982)
The
Armour
of
( London 1975)
Starr,
The
Roman
Imperial
Navy:
3 1
B .C.
( Ithaca 1941)
1 923:
E .
Constantino, VANAGS 1 983:
1 975:
Rome, C .G.
A . D.324,
H istoria de E spana - part
( 218 a .
P .
S trong,
La
S cultura
Romana
da
Augusto
a
( Florence 1923) Vanags,
The Glory that was
Pompeii,
( New
York
1 983) WHITE 1 970:
K . D.
White,
WHITEHOUSE
1 976:
H .
Whitehouse,
P alestrina Mosaic, WILD 1968:
J .P.
Wild,
A )
1 859:
G .
BAR Suppl.
Ser.
D al
Pozzo Copies of the
No.12,
Bonner Jahrbücher,
Wilkinson,
in the Bodleian Library,
definitive
The
( London 1970)
( Oxford 1976)
' Clothing in the North-West
t he Roman Empire', W ILKINSON
Roman Farming,
r eference
168,
p rovinces
1968,
of
166-240
Large S ketchbook No.22,
( Section
Western Asiatic Department -
no
has as yet been allocated because the
collection has been recently transferred from
6 9
the
Griffith
I nstitute of the Ashmolean Museum . W ILSON 1 938:
L .M. Wilson ,
The C lothing of
the
Ancient
Romans,
( Baltimore 1 938) WOOD
&
WHEELER
C olour,
1 966:
R .
Wood
& M . Wheeler ,
R oman Africa i n
( London 1966)
YADIN 1 963: Y .
Yadin,
The F inds
t he C ave of t he Letters,
f rom t he B ar
( Jerusalem 1 963)
7 0
Kokhba
P eriod
in
P LATES
P 1.1:
T he s econd r econstruction of a t unic when unbelted - note where t he s ides and bottom edge come on t he f igure.
P 1.2:
R ear
v iew of the belted tunic - note t he f olds c entering
o n t he knot and t he heavy blousing. P 1.3:
S ide v iew of the belted tunic - note t he f olds
c entering
o n t he knot and t he heavy blousing. P 1.4:
F ront
v iew of the belted tunic - note t he heavy blousing
u nder the arms which impedes a ccess t o t he s word and t he P 1.5:
hilt
o f
t he
' V '-shaped f old under the chin .
A s tance in the manner of the Chatsworth r elief
( Fig.8)
-
n ote the u se of the transverse l eather strap to gather in t he
spare
s leeveless
material
u nder
t he
l ook and the pronounced
r ight
a rm
p it,
' V '-shaped f old
t he u nder
t he chin . P 1.6:
Two
( modern)
f ibulae s ecure the two panels of the tunic
c lose t o t he n eck and under where
t he
t op
p late
o f
a
l orica s egmentata would come. P ls.7
&
8 :
T he unknotted tunic with a bared shoulder
w ith Figs.1 and 6 ).
7 1
( compare
• P . 4
e 2
r e l e ” 4 g 2 4
" 4 ' • s I 0 4
N •
7 5
DURA - E UROPOS AND T HE
I NTRODUCTION OF T HE
" MONGOLIAN RELEASE"
S imon James
Of the various ways of drawing a bowstring and releasing an a rrow ,
t here
a re
Mediterranean medieval
two
world
times.
which seem to have been standard in the
and The
t he
M iddle
f irst
of
Mediterranean release in which the t he
f ore-
l eft hand on the bowstring
and
thought
t he
l eft,
s tave.
Variants
have
On
r elease,
l eft arm ,
of
t his
m ethod
empires,
down
period of the Hunnic invasions of Europe if not l ater. i s
thought
t echnique was This
was
f ingers,
s o-called
Mongolian
the bowstring.
but
held
to
of
t o
t he
2
a t some date in l ate antiquity a new
introduced by nomadic peoples
the
t humb holds
t hat
t he
which i s
been universal in the classical
world and in the P arthian and Sassanian
I t
of
The shaft rests on the
1
against the
bracer.
t o
and
s o-called
with the nock of the arrow
l eft s ide of the bow
i s thrown to the a re
c lassical
m iddle f inger.
c ommonly protected by a r elease
i n i s
f irst two or more f ingers
t he r ight hand rest on the bowstring, between
E ast t hese
3
f rom
r elease,
The arrow
i s
C entral
A sia.
in which only the
not
g ripped
by
t he
t he string by a s lightly sprung nock or
s imply wedged between the thumb and a knot on the string itself. Unlike the Mediterranean release, r ight be
s ide
of the bowstave,
thrown
outwards
unnecessary.
f rom
However,
t he
t he
the
s haft
s its
against
t he
and on release the string tends to l eft
g reat
arm ,
s train
making p laced
r equired the wearing of a r ing to spread the
a
bracer
on the thumb
l oad over the
ball
of the thumb to prevent cutting and ensure a smooth release.
4
The date and place of invention of the Mongolian release u nknown,
but
j ade r ings
i n China in Han times, e arly Roman empires. C entral s ocial,
A sian
5
n omads
i dentified as thumbrings
i .e.
contemporary with the
t o
whom
s kill
r eview
o f
t he
found nothing to indicate that the Mongolian
However,
7
and
6
r elease was known in I ran or the West before c entury.
P arthian
at archery was of great
importance.
Jon Coulston's excellent and very thorough evidence
imply i ts use
I t i s more l ikely to have been invented by
military and practical
available
i s
i ncompletely
D ura-Europos
in Syria indicates that
M iddle East,
by Rome,
t he
published i t
was
l ater
f ourth
evidence employed
S assanian Persia or both,
i n
f rom t he
by the mid third
c entury AD. Dura
was
a g arrison c ity of the Roman empire besieged and
d estroyed by the S assanians
in the mid 2 50s AD.
7 7
8
The
c ity
was
n ever
r eoccupied,
s o
t here
M iddle Roman deposits. b etween
1 928
and
e xceptionally
The
a re no l ater phases overlying the
j oint Yale-French Academy e xcavations
1 937
r ecovered
well preserved arms,
l arge
quantities
o f
i ncluding archery e quipment,
d eposited during the s iege. D uring the course of p olished
bone,
( Figs.1 and 2 ).
t he
e xcavations
Unfortunately,
it was described a s
r eason
g iven
s o
i t
r ing
" certainly P arthian",
a
c asual
s urface
f ind,
on the s ite by s ome hunter in l ater t imes.
a nd
d ot
d iagnostic,
d ecoration
but
i ts
r ing
o f
was r ecovered 9 1°
b ut
n o
m ay reasonably be s uggested that the
t humbring could have been d ropped
b roken
no exact provenance was r ecorded.
A t the t ime, was
a
c ertainly an archer's t humbring ,
o f
s tate
t he o f
object
a n
1 1
i tself
preservation
M aterial which had not been deeply buried on
i s
i s t he
object
T he s imple hardly
s ignificant. s ite
was
i n
v ery poor condition due to t he penetration of the s urface l ayers by
t he
w inter
d egradation . b uried, p eriod.
r ains which f acilitated chemical and biological
The r ing i s therefore l ikely to
been
d eeply
which in turn s uggests t hat i t does belong to t he s iege But clearly ,
this i s hardly conclusive.
The crucial evidence comes s hafts f ound at the s ite
f rom
t he
( Figs.3 and 4 ).
s ealed during the f ighting , b est
have
f ragments
o f
s o their dating i s beyond doubt.
e xample i s a shaftment with i ts f letdhing intact ,
one f rom the Roman empire. positioning
of
a rrow
Some come f rom contexts
1 2
The main point of interest
The
t he only i s
t he
t he f letdhing. Arrows d esigned to be shot u sing
t he Mediterranean r elease must have a s pace between the tail end o f the vanes and the nock to a ccomrodate the f ingers holding the a rrow t o t he bowstring , D ura
a rrow
or the f letching will
has no s uch gap;
e dge of the nock.
c rushed.
I therefore s uggest t hat this arrow
have been shot with the Mongolian r elease, a s
b e
t he f ingers do not g rip the arrow.
1 3
v anes
have
f allen
a part,
c an
only
which requires no g ap
S everal other l ess well
p reserved shaftments bear t races of their f letching. t he
T he
the vanes e xtend r ight back t o the
1 4
A lthough
t he base of each f eather still
a dheres to the r eed shaft so it may plainly be s een that in each c ase t hey e xtended s haftment
t o
t he
e dge
o f
t he
f rom Dura has the tell-tale g ap ,
n ock.
No
s urviving
but t he s ample i s so
s mall that this cannot be s een a s proof t hat a ll arrows were of
F ig.1: The Dura t humbring,
Yale no.
1 929.475A
( photo;
author).
Fig.2: T he Dura thumbring. Fig.3:
D etails of shaftments f rom Tower 1 9. Yale n o. 1 933.445A ( bottom ) and 1 933.445C, s howing the vanes reaching the e dge of the nock. 7 8
0
7 9
2 0 mm
0
F ig.4: S haftments and C ), t ower
f rom
1 90mm
T ower
and f rom " L7-W",
1 9
( left t o r ight ,
1 933.445A ,
t he wall i n the v icinity o f
( right). 8 0
B , t he
t he attested design. The Mongolian r elease, D ura.
I t
i s
then ,
was employed at the
s cutum
and
s uggest that they c ollapsed
of
r ather more difficult to decide who was using it.
Three of the shaftments were found inside tower f amous
s iege
and
horse
armours
belonged
s ealed
the c ity.
1 6
r ecords
and plans,
However,
t o
l ay.
the
1 9,
This
1 5
defenders,
where
the
would s eem to a s
t he
tower
i ts contents before the Persians overran i n
t he
absence
of
adequately
d etailed
the possibility that they were shot into the
t ower by the attackers cannot be ruled out. To
c onclude,
t he
D ura
evidence
d emonstrates
that
the
Mongolian release was known on the borders between the Roman and S assanian
empires
by
t he mid-third century AD,
e arlier than has hitherto been believed. u se
at
t he
over a century
How widespread was
time i s a question which remains unanswered.
absence of contemporary depictions may suggest that l ong time to become common in the Middle East. c ould
i t
1 7
i ts The
took
a
Alternatively ,
it
be a salutary warning of the dangers of using depictional
evidence
f or such f ine technical details of military history.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would l ike to thank Yale University Art Gallery, particular
Ms.
S usan
Matheson,
and
in
f or permission to publish the
Dura thumbring and arrows.
FOOTNOTES 1 .
RAUSING ,
2 .
COULSTON ,
3 .
MORSE,
1 885;
COULSTON,
4 .
MORSE,
1 885,
1 6;
5 .
POPE-HENNESSY, 1 975,
1967,
2 8;
1985,
COULSTON ,
1985,
2 78.
2 77-8. 1 985,
LUSCHAN ,
1 923,
2 75-8.
1891,
7 4-6 and
6 70; plate
COULSTON , 5 0;
1 985,
RAWSON
&
2 76. AYERS,
6 3 no.171.
6 .
COULSTON,
1985,
2 77.
7 .
COULSTON,
1985,
2 76-8.
8 .
The
best
contains a CUMONT
D ura i s HOPKINS 1981 which also t he e xcavations, s ee b ibliography. For
i ntroduction f ull
1 926;
to
eries of F inal R eports t he Dura R eps and the s 8 1
which remains incomplete.
9 .
s ee JAMES 1 985.
Yale
G allery
U niversity
f ield number , mentioned 3 9 =4
Art
if
any ,
i n D ura
D ura R ep.
I I,
1 1.
COULSTON ,
1 985,
l ost. I I,
plate XXIV , was
T he
7 3-4.
object
was
o f
Dura
b riefly
I ts s urviving l ength i s
and height l lmm .
7 4. 2 76.
1 2. Yale no.1933.445A ,
This
i s
R ep.
i nventory no.1929.475A .
width of aperture c .24mm ,
1 0.
1 3.
For the m ost recent discussion
t he date of the s iege,
published in D ura R ep.
V I,
453,
no .1
and
top l eft. s uggested
i n D ura
overlooked by Coulston ,
R ep.
V I,
4 53,
a
and by myself until this
r eference p aper
was
a lready in draft. 1 4. Yale nos.1933.445B; 1 5. Yale
1933.445C;
n os.1933.445A
appears to be
t o
" L7-W",
C .
1982.28.34.
T he
p rovenance
of
1 982.28.34
which i s the c ity wall in the v icinity
of tower 19. 1 6.
Tower 1 9 collapsed when the P ersian attackers f ired t he mine t hey had dug beneath i t ,
with the intention of bringing down
t he tower and adjacent wall to create a breach be c arried by a ssault.
which
c ould
The collapse t herefore occurred while
t he defenders were still in control. 1 7.
COULSTON ,
1 985,
2 76-8.
ABBREVIATION D ura
R ep.:
P .V.C.
E xcavations at F irst vols.
B aur,
M .I.
R ostovtzeff e t
D ura-Europos.
to N inth S easons,
P reliminary
1 928-1936,
in 1 0 parts.
8 2
a l.,
e ds.
T he
R eports
o f
the
( New Haven 1929-1952),
8
B IBLIOGRAPHY COULSTON 1 985: M .C.
J .C.
B ishop,
Coulston , The
Military Equipment, 1985)
' Roman archery equipment',
P roduction
and
D istribution
in
of
BAR International Series,
no.275
Fouilles de Doura-Europos
1 922-3,
e d. Roman
( Oxford
2 20-348
CUMONT 1926:
F .
Cumont,
( Paris
1 926) HOPKINS 1981:
C .
Hopkins,
The
D iscovery
of
Dura-Europos
( New
Haven and London 1981) JAMES
1 985:
S .T.
James,
' Dura-Europos
Syria in the 2 50s AD', LUSCHAN 1 891:
H .
von
Chiron,
Lusdhan ,
XV ,
and the chronology of
1985,
1 11-24
' Bogenspannen ',
B erliner Anthropologischen Gesellschaft, 1 891, MORSE
Verhandlung
der
S itzung von 1 8 Juli
6 70
1 885:
E .S.
arrow-release',
Morse,
' Ancient
and
modern
methods
Bulletin of the E ssex I nstitute,
XVII,
of
1 885,
3 -56 P OPE-HENNESSY
1 923:
U .
P ope-Hennessy,
Early
Chinese
Jades
( London 1923) RAWSON
&
AYERS
1 975:
Throughout the Ages RAUSING 1 967:
G .
D evelopment
J .
Rawson
&
J .
Ayers,
Chinese
Jade
( London 1975)
Rausing,
The Bow;
( Lund 1967)
8 3
Some Notes
on i ts Origin
and
P ROFESSOR R OBERT N EWSTEAD AND F INDS O F ROMAN M ILITARY M ETALWORK F ROM C HESTER G .
L loyd-Morgan
Although some R oman f inds had been d iscovered and published f rom
t he
s eventeenth
c entury on ,
t hese t ended to be the l arge
u nmistakable items s uch as a ltars or architectural f ragments,
i t
was not until the l ater part of the n ineteenth century that more a ttention was g iven t o the s maller, f ragments of metalwork. s urvey R oman f or
t he
In 1 886 W .
Cheshire,
c ounty,
often
l ess
well
e xhaustively collating all t he evidence
i ncluding
e arly
m anuscript
a ccounts
a ntiquarian collections.
Apart f rom the coin l ists,
b rooches
m etalwork
and
o ther
p athetically small
( Watkin
r ecorded
p .202-208),
s ome
o f
provides
i s a
a stray.
1 886 was a m ilestone in another respect a s i t marked the o f
t he
G rosvenor
t he
C hester
i tems
C hester
i t
a ccount
c ollections
t he
f rom
t hough
and
the f inds of
u seful opening
o f
preserved
Thompson Watkin published his
M useum ,
which
A rchaeology
s ince i ts f oundation in 1 849,
which have s ince gone was
S ociety
t o
f or
Natural
the
and the arrival of Robert Newstead
who was appointed a s Curator of the collections of S ociety
house
has a ccumulated
S cience.
I t
was
t he
C hester
n ot l ong before he was
i nvolved with the d isplay and conservation of the archaeological m aterial,
housed in the s ame building ,
e xcavations
and
a rchaeological
f inds
f rom
publications,
t he
and with the r eporting of
r egion.
Amongst
a r ecord of a small angular military bronze buckle S treet 1 898 which
( JCAS 6 part 2 ,
his
e arly
which appear f rom 1 899 onwards,
p .160 p1.3 f ig.5,
f rom
acc.no.
c an be dated to the l ater s econd century A .D.
i s
H unter
3 0.R.1898) ( Oldenstein
1 976 p .215-6 Taf.76 no.1010).
This has s ince been paralleled
by
f inds
more
an
f rom
e xcavations
i n
r ecent
y ears,
s uch
a s
u npublished piece f rom Abbey Green 1 975-8 s mall f ind no.908. F rom
t he
s tructures c ity,
n ear
s ingle
a ccidentally
u ncovered
r eporting
d igging
North Wales. c emetery
i n
Chester ,
f inds
C heshire ,
t he
I nfirmary
b etween May 1 912 and 1 916, north
e astern
F ield ,
i nto
r escue
o f
t o our understanding of Roman Chester N ewstead
was
t he
t echniques
o f
his
( P1.1). his
t ime.
i ronwork hoard and o ther f inds f rom the
8 5
f ortress,
g reatest
m eticulous
s crap of evidence w ithin the l imits o f a rchaeological
t he
i t i s his excavations in the c orner
and R oman
dug at i rregular intervals
N ovember 1 922 and 1 938 which has been of c ontemporaries,
and
s outh Lancashire and
Although his f irst major excavation was
a t t he
o f
by building activity i n the
he e xtended his archaeological a ctivity
r esearch
F ield ,
handed
D eanery b etween
s ignificance
Unlike many of his
i n
r etrieving every
r esources
and
t he
H is retrieval of the
r edevelopment
s ite
on
P
P rof.
Robert
C hester,
April
N ewstead 1 935
e xcavating
( photo.
8 6
by H .S.
in the Deanery F ield, Woodward,
Chester).
H unter i ron
S treet in 1 914 i s typical. s cale
armour
f rom
I t included the f irst f ind of
B ritain ,
d iscussed i n his published a ccount p .73-4 pl. The
1 11.8,
which
he
( Pl.II.A ;
r ecognised
JCAS 2 7 part 2 1 928
I V).
i mportance
he placed on the small f inds c an be g auged
by the occasional b itter comments added to the e nd h is r eports. o f
which
been
a cquired
he notes that
a nd
I
am
American v isitors'
t old
f or
t he
' There
s ome
Archaeology
was
some
S ociety 's
r est
were
t hat
s ome
o f them were purchased by
( JCAS 6 ,
1 899,
s old
o f
' The
p .398);
i n
f or
1 914
were undertaken on t he s ite of the Co-Op S tores, -
o f
I n 1 899 referring to f inds f rom Bridge S treet ,
had
c ollections, p rices;
and
f abulous
e xcavations
Foregate S treet
e ither a remarkable s carcity of s mall f inds or a
l eakage through t he
hands
o f
t he
workmen '
( JCAS
2 7,
1 928,
p .102). The
r ichness
e xcavations,
o f
t he
f inds
he
d id
r etrieve on his own
or by paying workmen on building s ites, has been of
c onsiderable value,
not only a s a s ource of comparative material
f or f inds f rom excavations during recent years, r ecord
H is e ssays at conservation e specially of the s ome
but
a lso
a s
a
o f what was d iscovered on s ites now totally obliterated. i nstances
a ppear
primitive,
p roved to be effective.
b ut
i ronwork,
t hey
m ay
i n
have in the main
Effective enough so that in s ome
c ases,
s uch
a s t he f ragments of l orica s egmentata f rom Kings Buildings
1 921,
a
c orrect
r ediscovered
i dentification
( JCAS
2 7
p laques and f ittings ( Pl.III.A)
p art
c ould
2 ,
( Pl.II.B),
H e
was
i nscriptions, ( Pl.IV.A;
i t
was
p .91 no.3-8 P l.IX).
Belt
buckles
made
a nd
and pendants whole or incomplete
t he same weight of a ttention a s the bone.
be
1 928,
j ust
a s
LAAA 1 8,
1 931,
d ecorative ( Pl.III.B)
c oins,
p articular
or t he s crawled
pottery
whether
g raffiti
when
o n
s tuds
r eceived
o r
worked
he was publishing a
' luggage
l abel'
p .140 no.127 P l.L).
H is work was r ecognised both in Chester when in 1 936 he was g ranted
t he
f reedom
o f
t he c ity ,
and internationally when he
p rovided e xhibits f or the B ritish contribution to E xhibition
o f
i llustrating p hotographs p .125).
t he t he
and
R oman Empire, R oman
c asts
o ccupation o f
l ocal
Although he only published
of
f orty
f actual
o r
s o
about
t he
c ontemporaries. t races
o f
o ccupation ,
o perations brought t hem to l ight ,
and
8 7
e ight
1 936,
a rticles
and
e specially the m ilitary
which
A s P rofessor D roop , R oman
p lans,
t hey contain a wealth of
t he
was
r ecognised
by
a colleague on some of
h is l ater e xcavations noted in the obituary r ecording
w ith
in contrast to the hundred
f inds,
a spects of the occupation of Chester , h is
Augustan
( JCAS 3 1 part 2 ,
t hirty
on natural history,
i nformation
C hester
f inds
p amphlets on archaeological s ubjects, a nd
t he
which opened in R ome in 1 937,
' He was untiring
i n
a s chance or building s mall
s ums
he
was
g l t
8 8
c onstantly
e xpending
t o
s ave
potsherds
a nd other f inds f rom
oblivion must have t otalled a l arge amount over the he
was not a wealthy man...
There was
N ewstead about s cientific d igging,
but most of what
R oman work in Britain I l earnt f rom him , o f
patient
work
a nd
y ears;
observation '
and
l ittle that I could t each I
know
o f
the result of his years
( JCAS
3 6
p art
2 ,
1 948,
p .180-1).
B IBLIOGRAPHY I : A S elect B ibliography
f rom
R obert N ewstead
1 859 - 1 8 F eb.
' Notes
on
( 11 S ept.
s ome
R oman
environments'
the
R emains
Archaeological
f ound
R eports
of
1 947) i n
t he
C ity
a nd
i ts
JCAS 6 ( 1899) p .156-162
' Discovery of Roman R emains in Bridge Street 1899'
JCAS 6 ( 1899)
p .395-399 ' A D escriptive account of Roman and other objects r ecovered f rom v arious s ites in
C hester
and
D istrict
1 898-1901'
JCAS
8
( 1901) p .81-106 ' The
R oman
C emetery
i n
t he
I nfirmary F ield ,
Chester'
LAAA 6
( 1914) p .121-167 ' The Roman Cemetery in the I nfirmary F ield ,
C hester ,
P art
i i'
LAAA 8 ( 1921) p .49-60 ' Report
on t he Excavations on the s ite of the Roman camp at the
D eanery F ield ,
Chester'
LAAA 1 1
( 1924) p .59-86
' Report on the Excavations on the s ite of the Roman Fortress t he D eanery F ield , ' Records
o f
Chester
Archaeological
( no.2) F inds
.
LAAA 1 5
a t
a t
( 1928) p .3-32
Chester'
JCAS 2 7 P art 2
( 1928) p .59-162 w ith J .P.
D roop
P art 1 : w ith J .P.
D roop
P art 2 :
' Excavations i n the D eanery F ield ,
The Excavations'
LAAA 1 8
' Excavations in the D eanery F ield ,
The F inds'
LAAA 1 8
I ron
hob
f ittings, ( photos.
nails,
Chester 1 928.
( 1931) p .113-156
I ron Scale armour f rom Hunter S treet , I I.B:
Chester 1 928.
( 1931) p .6-18
c opper
D eanery F ield , R . Newstead).
a lloy 1 928.
Scale 1 :1
8 9
belt
Chester 1 914 p laques
a nd
PI.III.A: Copper alloy buckles, two with enamel inlay, pelta-shaped plaques, Deanery Field, 1928.
and
fl.III.B: Copper alloy, lead, and iron pendants, Deanery Field, 1928. {photos. R. Newstead). Scale 1:1 90
w ith J .P.
D roop
' The
R oman
Amphitheatre
a t
Chester'
JCAS
2 9
( 1932) p .5-40 w ith
J .P.
D roop
C hester' w ith
J .P.
' The south e ast corner of the Roman Fortress,
JCAS 2 9 ( 1932) p .41-49 D roop
d iscovered
' The
T urret
R oman a nd
F ortress
Rampart
a t
Chester :
B uilding '
LAAA
A 2 2
N ewly ( 1935)
p .19-30 w ith J .P.
D roop
' Excavations in
Green 1 935'
LAAA 2 3
( 1936)
t he
D eanery
' Records of Archaeological F inds i i - v ' w ith
J .P.
D roop
' Excavations
S treet C learance Area'
F ield
a t
JCAS 3 3
Chester
Abbey
F inds
v i'
JCAS
( 1939) p .5-117
1 939.
JCAS 3 4 part 1 ( 1939)
' Records o f Archaeological
and
p .3-50
3 6
The P rincess
p .5-47 p art
2
( 1948)
p .49-172 T he R oman O ccupation of Chester JCAS
Journal
o f
t he
( Deva)
Chester
( Chester 1 948)
Archaeological Society
( 1849 to
present) LAAA L iverpool University Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology ( 1908-1948)
I I:
O ther R eferences
M anning ,
W .H.,
1985 C atalogue of t he Romano-British I ron
Tools,
F ittings and Weapons i n t he B ritish M useum ( London) O ldenstein ,
J .,
1 976
Auxiliareinheiten '
' Zur
B ericht
Ausrüstung
der
r ömischer
Römisch-Germanischen
Kommission 5 7 p .49-284 Watkin,
W .
R emains
Thompson , in
f acsimile,
the
1 886 R oman C heshire: County o f C hester
Wakefield 1 974
9 1
A D escription o f R oman
( Liverpool)
r eprinted in
APPENDIX I : A CHECK L IST OF SOME C HESTER A lthough
most
s mall f ragments,
of
t his
t he
F INDS
i tems
O F
R OMAN
ARMOUR
FROM
l isted below s urvive only a s
preliminary
c atalogue
w ill
g ive
s ome
i ndication of the s ize of the collections of military f inds f rom C hester
g athered
f ittings,
over
t he l ast s eventy years or more.
S maller
s uch as the decorative belt plaques or f astening l oops
f or t he l orica s egmentata,
are common ,
weapons l ess
s o ,
t hough
a t l east s even decorated s cabbards have been identified to date. Unless
s tated to the contrary,
a ll i tems are in the collections
housed in the Grosvenor Museum ,
A :
Chester.
F inds of l orica s egmentata
n o.381.R.1976 Large f ragments f rom Kings B uildings, N ewstead JCAS 2 7 part 2 ,
1 928,
Chester 1 921
p .91 no.3-8 pl.IX
n o.382.R.1976 two f ragments with parts of
hinge
i n
s itu.
o ld
c ollns. Unpublished items f rom recent excavations
( consisting mainly
o f AE f ittings with f ragments of l orica attached). S t.
M artins F ield 1 964 ,
C rook
S treet,
1 973-4,
s mall f ind no. small f ind no's.
5 1 1 96,
4 12,
6 61,
6 65 ,
7 55 ,
2 568 ,
and
and an unnumbered i tem f rom l ayer 68. Abbey Green 1 975-8 ,
s mall f inds
perhaps no's. Hunter S treet S chool, Hunters Walk,
B :
n o's.
1 426,
1 919,
1 677 and 1 802?
1979 small f ind no 's 5 07,
1980 s mall f ind no's 5 33,
1 036.
5 45.
F inds of s cale armour
( i)
B ronze f or s ewing on t o l inen backing in rows.
n o.377.R.1976 two examples f rom the Deanery F ield 1 928. D roop
and
N ewstead LAAA
1 8
( 1931)
p .135-6
no.8
p l.XLVII ( ii)
Bronze - l inked together on a ll s ides
n o.377.R.1976 one example D eanery F ield 1 928 D roop
and
N ewstead LAAA
1 8
( 1931)
p .135-6
no.8
p l.XLVII n o.Go
1 9
two
f ragments f rom Goss S treet 1 948,
not included in
t he excavation r eport. Unpublished i tems f rom recent excavations N ewgate/Pepper S treet 1 963-4 small f ind no.
1 42 = no.376.R .1976 ,
a t l east s ix f ragments F rodsham S treet 1966 s mall f ind no. 9 2
64b f our l umps
G oss S treet ,
1 973 s mall f ind no 's 1 287,
C rook S treet,
1 973-4 small f ind no 's
c ontext n o 's Abbey G reen , ( iii)
I 2 9;
1 816,
8 41,
1 834.
a nd
f ragments
f rom
and I F 5 2.
1975-8 s mall f ind no 's 6 25,
1 992
I ron - l orica squamata
H unter
S treet
1 914
( Pl.II.A)
n o.1928.8-9.4;
n ow
i n
t he
B ritish
M useum
1 928.7-9.5 and 1 928.7-9.6.
N ewstead JCAS 2 7 part 2 ,
1 928,
p .73-4
p l.IV
a nd
I II
n o. 8 M anning 1 985 p .146 no.T1-3, D eanery F ield 1 922-3, G oss S treet 1 973,
C :
P 1.71.
Newstead LAAA 1 1,
s mall
f ind no.
2 594,
1 924 ,
p .77 pl.III i .
unpublished
F inds o f c hainmail
( i)
B ronze
n o.375. R.1976,
old c ollns.
Unpublished i tems
c a.
1 4 l inks.
f rom recent excavations
F rodsham S treet 1 966 ,
s mall f ind no.
1 58
O ld M arket Hall 1 967-9 Phase I II s mall f ind no's. L ower
B ridge
S treet,
1 974 small f ind no 's 2 49,
6 14, 2 50
869
( mixed i ron
a nd copper a lloy) ( ii)
I ron
D eanery F ield ,
1923,
now in the British Museum no.1928.7-9 .8
Newstead LAAA 1 1,
1 924 ,
p .77-8 ,
p 1.111 no.3
M anning 1 985 p .146 no.T3a P l.XVIII. Another f ragment f rom the s ame s ite and i llustrated by 1 924
op.cit.
b rass l inks.
P l.III
n o.2
i s
N ewstead
d escribed a s i ron with a row of
I t c annot now be l ocated.
no.602.R.1977 Deanery F ield 1 924-6 r ing of i ron ? from chain mail Newstead LAAA 1 5 n o.254.R.1977,
( 1928)
p .20 no.10 pl.VIII
Deanery F ield 1 928
D roop & N ewstead LAAA 1 8
9 3
( 1931) p .136 no.84 pl.XLVIII
P 1.1V.A . : rV.B:
L ead
' luggage l abel'
c opper a lloy
' Luggage
D eanery F ield , I V.C:
I ron Caltrop , ( photos R .
" > T ITIANI", l abel'
1 922-3 D eanery F ield ,
Newstead).
1 928.
Scale 1 :1
9 4
D eanery F ield ,
" LEG XX/ IULI
1928.
CA/NDIDI",
P l.V.Aa
C hester P ageant 2 0th.
V .3:
9 0:
Agricola with
s oldiers
L egion.
C hester P ageant
9 0:
' Soldiers playing dice'
9 5
o f
t he
APPENDIX I I: I n
A ROMAN EPISODE IN THE CHESTER PAGEANT OF 1910
the
autumn
of
1 909
i t was d ecided to mark the three
hundredth anniversary of the Pageant performed on the Roodee S t.
G eorge's
Day
1 610
honour of her Prince'. a ll
a spects
which
1 910.
in
history
were
was
Eaton
After the
held, P ark
to
on
t o
cover
t he
s atisfaction
of
a ll
t he 1 8th to 2 3rd July inclusive e ight
e pisodes
f rom
C hester's
The cast l ist i s taken f rom the Official
S ouvenir Programme which was i s
on
' Chester's Triumph in
( Robert Newstead was on the l ecture
I ntroduction , enacted.
performances;
the title
Various committees were s et up
of the pageant
committee), concerned,
u nder
on
s ale
b efore
and
during
the
the description of the action in the Roman episode
taken f rom the revised account published later in the Journal
of
the
The
Chester Archaeological Society vol.17
i llustrations
photographs Chester
now
( Pl. V. A ,
Episode
1 :
are in
r eproduced
the
f rom
collection
a
o f
( 1910) s et
p .107-119.
of
o riginal
the Grosvenor Museum ,
B ).
Agricola
returns
to
Deva
after
defeating
the
Ordovices A . D.78 Felix, P iso,
a Roman Soldier a Roman Soldier
Carantus, D euccas, Cn.
a Briton a Briton
Julius Agricola,
B rica, C .
D ecius,
Hodge
Mr.
J .G.
Mr.
S .
Dring
Mr.
L .
Bebbington
R ev.
a British Maiden
Frater
J .R.
Miss M .
Brica's Father
Aufidius Rufus,
A .
Governor of
the Province of Britain C unobarrus,
Mr.
a Centurion
a Roman Soldier
Fuller
Keall
Mr.
George Cochrane
Mr.
Thomas G .
McQuire
Mr.
E .T.
Carpenter
Mr.
E .P.
I rving
The M ilitary Tribune
Mr.
P ercy Smith
Ledicca,
Mrs.
Valerius,
a Roman Soldier Brica's Mother
L ictors,
Trumpeters,
Legionaries
the I I Adjutrix P ia Fidelis, the Wild Boar, Children, ' Although
Mason
of the XX Valeria Victrix,
Standard Bearers with the Eagle and
the Badge of the Legions.
British Men ,
Chester ,
anciently
" Dev e,
down to us of any s cene that l ends
spectacular display. c haracter,
By making the
are
episode
applicable to any town in these
a s cene possessing much dramatic ' We
and
was an important garrison
t own during the Roman occupation of Britain , c ome
Women
and Sutlers.
and
a lthough
C ity possesses a r ich store of remains of that period, has
and
t he
no record
itself to adequate one
of
a
g eneral
I slands at that time,
force has been constructed.
introduced to Julius Agricola, 9 6
the great statesman and
warrior,
whose administration of this
c ountry
f orms
t he
most
b rilliant epoch of the Roman occupation.
He was a m an profoundly
s killed
He s trove to conciliate
i n
t he
a rts of peace and war.
t he n ative tribes by a cts of kindness,
and introduced among them
m any of the advantages of c ivilisation. ' Agricola came to D eva at the c lose of a s uccessful campaign Wales.
I n
t he
h is officers.
s cene before u s,
A Briton steals up behind him ,
and Agricola
only j ust i n time to s ave himself f rom assassination. i s
s eized
by the angry soldiers,
o f the man 's action f lagrantly a rrest , where
i nsulted
i s by
t o a
l ife
o r
o fficer i s at stake, ' Agricola, himself,
however,
a t
a venge
his
c enturion.
l east
t urns
The native
and we g ather that the motive b ride, The
t he
who
has
been
c enturion i s under
but the Briton mistrusts the honesty of t he
i n
he i s engaged in business with
R oman
j ustice,
l iberty of so important an
and only a native has been wronged. has the c lemency to f orgive the a ssault upon
and further v indicates the honour of his r ace by having
t he c enturion brought to immediate trial, s ending him t o death within the hour.'
9 7
and after
c onviction ,
T HE
WELLINGBOROUGH A ND N IJMEGEN MARCHES D . Atkinson and L .
Morgan
D uring 1984 organised walking events by the Waendal Walkers C lub
at
Wellingborough,
Northants and the Dutch K .N.B.L.O.
N ijmegen were entered by the society to carry t rials
of
Roman
m ilitary
1 00
miles
i n
f our
basic
at
f ield
equipment under strict s crutiny and
appropriate f ield conditions. and
out
D istances of
days
5 2 miles
r espectively
in two
d ays
were covered.
The
purpose was to wear R oman military equipment and march in it for a g iven l ength of t ime over distances that would bear comparison with t he daily march routine of the a ccount
of Vegetius,
l egions as
specified in
the
and f inally to assess the effects on both
1
the reconstructions and the wearers. The entrants commenced training during November of 1 983 progressively increased the t empo and length of the march t hey
were
was
attained
the
Once
equipment was worn.
persons 2 representing a i st century l egionary in equipment,
until
c apable of covering the average official Northampton
marathon route at an average speed of 4mph. objective
and
a
l ight
a uxiliary
o f
t his
i nitial
F inally, f ull
four
f ighting
the same period and two 4th
c entury infantrymen took part in the marches.
3
EQUIPMENT Armour Owing to the d ifficulties encountered in obtaining suitable s heet iron the helmets,
lorica and the blades
constructed from mild steel. that
this
material
s imilar to the i nvolved
r epeated
and
reheating
( caligae)
on numerous s ites throughout Europe. and various f rom
a
s ingle
p iece
Holland.
4
s tudded
boot
a s
The patterns for the
f orts a long Hadrian's Wall.
u sed came f rom Valkenburg Z .H. made
in
f inished product.
uppers were taken f rom archaeological reports London
cycles
f orges would thereby have ensured a reasonably
The caligae u sed were a standard pattern f ound
were
Their manufacture which must have
hammering
high carbon content in the
The Boots
weapons
would possess a tensile strength generally
i ron originals.
c harcoal-fuelled
of
We are nevertheless r easonably sure
f rom
Valkenburg,
The stud pattern
The open work upper
i s
of cowhide with three or four sole
9 9
p ieces s ewn on and over 1 30 metal studs bottom , with no raised heel. I nitially
s ocks
were
n ot
worn
u nduly
R omans, walk
f lat
c aligae but
i ntroduction.
W e
were
would
be
c onditioned
t o
f ar g reater d istances than their modern counterparts.
F urthermore, a re
t he
t he
p erturbed by t his development a s we a ccept t hat the
whether military o r c ivilian
f or
i nto
i nside
p ersistent blistering soon f orced their n ot
f itted
socks or at l east their equivalent
mentioned
a s
f oot
c overings
having been s ent to a soldier s erving in the
F irst Tungrian Cohort at Vindolanda in t he period A .D.95-105. Whether socks were worn for the s ame r eason o r
a s
5
o urselves,
s imply f or warmth cannot be a ssumed f or c ertain but t he f act
r emains that an a ssessment of the durability of n ot
o ur
f eet
was
t he
t he
object of the e xercise.
e xcess
o f
4 00
m iles
wearing
t herefore,
t he
t hat
a nd
A s a r esult of
t aking this decision we f inally managed t o cover a while
boots d istance
i n
d uring both t he t raining and t he marches r econstructed
e quipment.
W e
b elieve,
t his i s s ufficient j ustification i n i tself f or
t he wearing of socks. The boots were restudded immediately prior to the f our
d ay
N ijmegen marches and the pattern of the s tuds was made in modern hobnails. o f
A lthough
d urability
o riginals,
we c annot be positive a s to t he d ifferences
between
o ur
modern
we f eel if anything,
hobnails
a nd
t he
R oman
that modern studs would be of a
better quality. B y c alculating the rate of wear of t he studs, d istance
c overed,
we
f or 1 2 days on a metalled surface before s tuds
would
be worn down.
s urprisingly harder c omplete 8 d aysl
a gainst
t he
c oncluded t hat t he l egionary could march
on
By contrast ,
h is
boots
a ll
o f
h is
o riginal
t he l ight a uxiliary was
which
would
have
l ed
t o
r estudding and r eplacement of t he originals after only This unexpected result c an only b e explained by t he f act
t hat t he two persons d ifferent
ways.
i nvolved
i n
T he l egionary,
t he
e xperiment
p laced his heel down f irst whilst the auxiliary d ragged
m arched
i n
in s pite of his heavier l oading s eems
t o
have
his toes on occasions which c aused some part worn s tuds
t o be pulled out.
On s oft g round or unmetalled roads
t he
s tuds
would naturally have l asted l onger. W e
m ust
a cknowledge that the s cope of this e xperiment was
r ather narrow a s c omparative results boots
c an
hardly
b e
c onsidered
f rom
c onclusive.
g ives an average rate of wear of only before
t he
only
t en
s ole begins to s ustain damage.
d ays
o f
t he
p airs
For a ll t hat , r oad
o f i t
m arching
I t must be qualified
h ere t hat the wear takes p lace initially on the s ole
two
h eel,
t oe
and
f oot to a g reater extent t han the i nstep and that
1 00
t hese higher points require v irtually daily r eplacement. d ay a verage period i s therefore the o riginal
s tud would l ast.
t aking i nto a ccount r eplacement
o f
t he
t ime
f act
e quipment
t hat
f or
p articularly
i n
which
R oman
t he
t he
l ast
particularly
s oldiers,
i nvolved s toppages of pay.
w ear a lso highlights the l egionaries' s tuds
f or
This i s not a l ong t ime,
T he t en
t he
This high
g rievance over paying
f or
P annonian mutiny of A .D.14 and two
o ther r eferences made to calacarium endorse t he c laims
m ade
by
t he mutineers in P annonia: T acitus 6, mentions m oney', R ome.
a n a llowance c alled CLAVARIUM ,
which was c laimed by T he
t he
F lavian
o r
' nail
m arching
on
motivation f or the c laim was that the l ong march had
c aused unreasonable wear in mens' r eplaced
f orces
a gainst
boots
s toppages of pay.
which
c ould
only
b e
The f act that the a llowance
h ad a name s eems sufficient evidence f or i ts existence. S econdly, a bove, t o
s imilar a llowances,
a re mentioned by S uetonius.
possibly 7
t he
same
m arch r egularly f rom O stia or P uteoli to R ome,
m oney ', have
Vespasian ,
r equired
with his c ustomary dry
t hem
t o make the
a s
When the C lassiarii,
c laimed
humour,
i s
j ourney barefoot.
t he
who had ' boot
s aid
t o
According to
S uetonius they s till d id so in his day.
T HE MARCHES E ffects on the Wearers I n t emperatures of 7 0°F o r above,
a ll f our marchers
t ended
t o sweat profusely in their woolen c lothing but with one n otable e xception
g iven
b elow ,
t he
i nconvenience,
once
i nevitable became t olerable.
The c lothing however
r etain
a nd
dampness
d iscomfort l egionary
o vernight
was who
e xperienced
a
on
c ertain
t he
a ccepted a s d id
i nitial
f ollowing
t end
d egree of
m orning.
s teel l orica s uffered f rom
b outs of nausea and d izzyness after t hree t o f our hours W eight
l oss
a lso,
t emporary
b lindness
were
t he
a nd
O n
t his
d isorientation
were
e xperienced over a period of approximately 3 0 a dvice
o n
was e xcessive and during one particular 2 6
m ile march on a v ery hot day s even pounds o ccasion
T he
was obliged to undergo the additional i mposition
o f having the upper part of his body encased in a which p ermitted v ery l ittle a ir t o c irculate, m arch.
t o
s hed! s econds.
M edical
was s ought and we were informed t hat a f ar l arger i ntake
o f l iquid would be required t o counter d ehydration and t hat d isorientation ,
v ision
a ttributable
t o
s alt
a ttended
no f urther s ymptoms r ecurred.
t o,
f ailure d eficiency.
r elate t his s ituation to the i ssue R oman s oldiers.
a nd
n ausea
O nce o f
t hese
s alt
were
t he
d irectly
m atters
were
I t i s interesting to ( salaria)
t o
t he
I t would s eem probable that they understood that
1 01
i t
was an e ssential requirement f or maintaining a f ast marching
r ate quite apart f rom its m eat. o r
u ses
i n
f lavouring
a nd
preserving
We must a lso assume that e ach man e ither carried with him ,
had
i mmediately available,
l arge amounts of water. A lthough
t he s tomach should n ever be overloaded at l ong
m arch,
i ntervals.
s mall
amounts
I n our case,
n eed
t o
b e
b eginning
t aken
a t
o f
a
f requent
a f air approximation was half a p int per
hour which means that half a g allon c onsumed
t he
o f
water
d uring the course of a d ay's march.
p er
p erson
was
Urination o ccurred
s eldom if at a ll.
E ffects on the Equipment A lthough the c aligae came out rather h ighly
polished
m etal
o f
v isibly under the repeated drenching in l earned
t hat
a
t he
t he
i nitially
p erspiration .
W e
s oon
l iberal application of g rease would protect i t
f rom the worst effects of the corrosion . t o
well,
t he l orica and helmets deteriorated
s omewhat
Unfortunately this
u ncomfortable s ituation where arms, c oated
i n
t urn
a nd
l ed
f aces and
l egs s oon
became
u ltimately
c ustomary
t o exude an unpleasant odour compounded of grease and
s weat which d id nothing to endear u s to t he other t he
e nd
o f
t ainted.
t he day ,
i t
b ecame
m archers.
At
everything we ate and drank was s imilarly
I f we l earned nothing e lse f rom this,
we c an
a t
l east
b e c ertain that Roman t ravellers who encountered a m ilitary unit o n t he march would have passed t o windward! At
a n
e arly s tage in the t raining ,
c ertain l oosely attached
o f
e ither
o r
Whilst this can be endured over s hort d istances, i s
q uite
another
i llustrations of Marius' h istory books, h is
handle
m atter. f or s o
W e
l ong
F ree
hanging
i tems
t he
e nd
o f
s uch
a s
a c arrying pole,
c ertain ,
be more f irmly s ecured.
e ffects
on
f eature
o f
t he i n
would,
Q uite apart
d isposition of the s oldier.
f rom
by
we a re quite t he
a dverse
The banging of the
t he manner portrayed on Trajan's C olumn ,
t herefore
t aken into a ccount, B oth t he a gainst
t he
t he
r ight
c aused a
o f
t he equipment must be
l egionary and auxiliary swords t ended t o swing h ip
t o
a s well a s t he c arrying position . i n
a nd t high and to shift position constantly a s
t he march progressed. e ffect
d urability
f or t he
m etal hinge p in of 0 .931n d iameter on one of the c heekplates f racture,
2 5 t he
t he patera ,
s uspended
h elmet during our initial attempts to s uspend i t f rom the s houlder,
a
f eel s ure that the a
which i s u sually depicted a s being
f rom
o f one kind or
requires s ome r evision a s r egards the d isposal of
e quipment.
i nstance,
Mule,
p ropensities
r attled,
c lanked
m arch
i rritating
i t was noticeable t hat
e quipment
a nother. m ile
d eveloped
i tems
I n order
t o
c ounteract
t his
u npleasant
a nd prevent the n eed f or constant r eadjustment ,
1 02
t he belt
w as passed over both b aldric straps whereas
f ormerly
r ear s trap had been s ecured in this manner.
T he pommel,
h igh
up
u nder the r ight arm pit ,
I n the c ourse of t ime the
a ffected a reas became c alloused and hardened modifications
t o
t he
t he
s ituated
t ended to c hafe the bicep and
a t f irst this caused minor blistering. f urther
o nly
position
a nd o f
t herefore
t he
s word
n o
were
c onsidered necessary. The s uspension of the helmet on i nvestigation.
t he
r equired
s houlder
s ome
d ifficult and u ltimately c aused damage to the c heekpiece
h inge.
was
f rom
m arch
proved
i t
i t
t he
plates
M oreover
H anging
v ery d ifficult to unfasten with any degree of
u rgency a s would be required if a s udden a ttack d eveloped whilst o n t he march. was
Hanging the helmet by i ts t hong
i nitially
c omfortable,
a round
t he
n eck
but after half an hour or s o became
p ainful despite the protection of the s carf.
The solution
quite
s imply involved hanging it across the chest by passing the thong t hrough the horizontal chest s trap on the l orica. c ould
e asily
This operation
b e c arried out whilst at r est o r on the march and
t he helmet could be deployed with the s ame f acility. T he
c arrying
of
t he
s cutum
a lso
proved
d ifficult.
A
p ossible s olution has only now come under s erious consideration . T hough
we have no information r elevant to the arrangement
c arrying s trap or harness, e mployed. s topgap
f eel
s ure
o ne
must
have
b een
We therefore decided t o improvise a r easonably l ogical e xpedient
b earer.
we
o f a
which
u tilized
t he
hand
g rip a s t he l oad
The s cutum which we u sed was of a s tandard s ize.
That i s
t o s ay that i t conformed g enerally to the d imensions of the Dura s cutum and t hose of the shield covers f rom V indonissa.
A l eather
s trap was f astened t o both ends of the shield handgrip l oop
s o
f ormed
p laced over the r ight shoulder.
a nd
t he shield was c arried in a high port position on the l eft where
i t
s everely r estricted v ision in that d irection.
p osition interfered t herefore
opted
with
t he
movement
o f
t he
I n this manner
t he
l egs
s ide
A l ower a nd
we
f or the f irst choice a s the c arrying position .
T he carrying s trap was t ried in s everal d ifferent positions: 1 .
Locked
a round
t he
u nsatisfactory.
l eft
T he
s houlder
d ownward
p lates.
This
proved
pull of the s hield caused the
s trap t o j am progressively more t ightly under t he plates. t hereby
proved
a lmost
without a ssistance. s hield
t his
was
i mpossible
D espite the
t o
d rawback
I t
d isengage the shield i n
d eploying
t he
t he l east painful method attempted and our
s olution under c onsideration u ses this method a s
a
s tarting
point. 2 .
The
s trap a cross t he upper body and around t he r ight s ide of
t he n eck.
A d isaster!
A process of
s low
s trangulation
t ook
p lace. 3 .
R etention p late
o f
t he
( Epaulette)
c arrying
s trap
by t he projecting l orica
on the r ight shoulder.
1 03
This possibility was
s uggested by N icholas Fuentes and a ccordingly t ried over f irst
2 5
m iles
a t N ijmegen.
This method produced an e ffect
s imilar to t hat g iven in No.2 above. c ompressed
a nd
f orced
obvious d iscomfort, c ut
o ff
t o
u pwards
The r ight
s houlder
w as
a nd inwards. Apart f rom t he
breathing was r estricted and
c irculation
t he extent that towards t he f inal s tages o f the
march the r ight arm and shoulder u seless
t he
f or
a ny
were
c ompletely
p ractical purposes.
n umb
a nd
I t became e ssential t o
halt at more and more f requent intervals for r eadjustments t o be made.
I t was f ound l ater that the i nternal r ear
a lthough t hick,
m ade
o f
g ood
quality
c alf l eather about 0 .125in
had been r ipped and the r ivets and
t hem
t o
t he
l eathers,
washers
m etal plates were pulled f ree.
a ttaching
All this i n one
d ay's march of 2 5 miles. C onsequently a believe
t he
modus
weight
operandi
was
d eveloped,
f rom the l eft shoulder and are c urrently s imple
harness that s eems to work well,
c omment on it
h ence
we
o f the shield must be s uspended vertically
until
i t
has
been
e xperimenting
w ith
a
but we are r eluctant to
t ried
i n
t he
f ield.
O ur
e xperience shows that the shield cannot be carried by hand a lone o ver l ong d istances, c an
b e
a s
f urther that the wrong sort of carrying a id
p ainful
and e xhausting a s n o a id at a ll. A f urther
r eport on our progress will be published a s appropriate. I nsofar a s t he e quipment
l essons
a re concerned,
a brief mention .
An
l earnt
f rom
t he
f ourth
though of l ess s ignificance they m erit
a lmost
t otal
l ack
o f
a rmour
e xception of the helmet greatly f acilitated marching, f or
profuse
s weating
were
c arried
w ith
t he
and except
c aused by the woolen tunic and t rousers,
t he marches were comparatively enjoyable. s hields
c entury
T he l arge
r ound
f lat
a cross t he back by a s ingle l oop t hrough
t he handgrip passed over t he r ight or l eft shoulder a ccording to p reference.
By t he s imple process of bending the e lbow backwards
a gainst the projecting s ide of the shield and hooking the i nto
t he
b elt
o n
t he
t humb
appropriate s ide the s hield was e asily
s tabilised and no undue f atigue was experienced. I nitially the helmets and spathae T he
l atter
w as
s uspended
on
c aused
m inor
problems.
t he l eft s ide by a baldric over
w hich a waist belt was passed t o l ock i t i nto position , c hape
o f
b anging against t he wearer's shins. worn
o r
b ut
c arried
by hand.
T he helmet had e ither t o t ogether
t he helmet s uspended by t hem over t he hilt of t he sword. t he
weight
o f
3 0 d egrees
a nd
I n this
t he helmet counterbalanced that o f t he
s word and a s a r esult the s cabbard hung at an approximate o f
be
Eventually a n ingenious s olution was
a rrived at whereby t he helmet thongs were knotted m anner,
t he
t he s cabbard hanging a lmost v ertically downwards kept
f rom the v ertical,
t hereby keeping the offending chapes well out of the way.
1 04
a ngle
away f rom and behind t he l egs, I n t he
c ase of the two fourth century infantrymen were
u sed.
This
modern
s uede
t hat the reconstructed boots could not be broken in in ensure
that
blisters
point of fact, f airly
boots
c ompromise was forced upon us due to the fact t ime
to
were kept to an acceptably low l evel.
we believe that the boots which were worn bore
c lose resemblance of those of the actual period.
I n a
However
no tests could be carried out on these particular items as
t hey
would be i rrelevant.
NOTES 1 .
Vegetius Epitoma r ei militaris.
2 .
Members
taking
p art were David Atkinson ,
Morgan and Len Morgan.
Backup party
was
Steve Rogers, S tephany
Mark
Atkinson ,
E lizabeth Morgan and John Eagle. 3 .
List of equipment: l b
Legionary i st c entury A .D. Helmet
( cassis)
Body armour
I mperial Gallic
( Lorica Segmentata)
M ilitary belt
' H' Corbridge
( cingulum militare)
Dagger and scabbard
4 .4 ' B'
Cast plates
( Pugio et vagina)
1 8.959
kg 2 .0 8 .6
2 .64
1 .2
1 .54
0 .7
Fulham/Mainz pattern sword and s cabbard ( Gladius et vagina)
3 .52
1 .6
Boots
3 .3
1 .5
1 5.18
6 .9
Without l ead loading
2 .42
1 .1
C lothing and shield cover of canvas
3 .0
1 .3
( Caligae)
Shield
( Scutum)
Dura Europos s ize
( Pilum)
Hod Hill pattern.
Javelin
Total
5 4.959 l b
Auxiliary i st century A . D. Helmet
( cassis)
M ilitary belt
Coolus
Pompeii sword s cabbard Shield Boots
' C'
( cingulum militare)
( Clipeus)
Oval
Cast plates
( Gladius et vagina) type
( Caligae)
D agger and scabbard
( Pugio et vagina)
C lothing Total
2 4.9 kg
3 .52
1 .6
1 .10
0 .5
2 .86
1 .3
7 .49
3 .4
3 .3
1 .5
1 .54
0 .7
1 .5
0 .7
2 1.31
9 .7
No body armour was worn by the Auxiliary 4th century l imitaneus
( Frontier soldier)
1 05
lb
kg
Helmet
( cassis)
I ntercisa pattern
Sword,
s cabbard and baldric
2 .21
1 .0
vagina et balteus)
5 .72
2 .6
M ilitary belt.
0 .40
0 .2
S hield ,
( Spatha,
4 th century pattern
based on Dura Europos round/oval
pattern C lothing
( approx.)
Total
1 1.0
5 .0
2 .2
1 .0
2 1.52
8 .8
No body armour was worn by the Limitaneus. 4 .
GROENMAN-VAN WAATERINGE,
5 .
BOWMAN & THOMAS ,
6 .
Tacitus Histories
7 .
Suetonius Vespasian 8 ,3.
1 983,
1967.
No.15.
1 11,50.
B IBLIOGRAPHY BOWMAN
&
THOMAS 1 983:
A .K.
Latin Writing Tablets,
Bowman & J . Britannia
Thomas,
Vindolanda:
Monograph
S eries
the
No.4,
( London 1983) GROENMAN-VAN Romeins 2 ,
P ls.I
WAATERINGE
1 967:
W .
Groenman-van
l ederwerk u it Valkenburg Z .H.,
Waateringe,
Nederlandse Oudheden
( Groningen 1 967)
& I I The N ijmegen march - these photographs show the method
of
s uspension of helmet and other equipment
on t he march method
- this
i s
to be
i llustrated on Trajan's
1 07
c ontrasted Column
w ith
t he
APPENDIX:
THE ROMAN M ILITARY RESEARCH SOCIETY
I n 1 983 a small group of people came s ociety
t ogether
t o
f or practical experimentation w ith the arms,
e quipment of the R oman army. r ealisation
t hat
m any
The
R .M.R .S.
was
f orm
a
armour and
f ormed
i n
t he
g aps in our knowledge could be u sefully
a ddressed by practical experimentation . T he i tems
l ast three years
o f
R oman
have
a rmour
a nd
been
s pent
weapons,
i n
i n l ecturing at home and
a broad and in carrying out s imple basic t ests, c onjunction i nto
t he
w ith
marching
d urability ,
have
r econstructing t hese
o ften
i n
a llowed u s to g ain an i nsight
awkwardness
a nd
practicability
o f
r econstructions. Our
k it
n ow
encompasses
f igures f rom the l ate R epublican
a rmy t hrough to f ourth c entury soldiers o f the R oman army. a re the s ubject of our l ectures at home and
abroad
T hese
which
have
b een t ailored to s uit a ll l evels of interest. T he
s ociety
i s in t he main based i n Northampton and i t i s
here t hat we have had our greatest s uccess to date v isits.
W e
c an
a dd
c hildren are l earning about Roman B ritain knowledge
a dds
a
w ith
s chool
a u seful v isual a id for t eachers when the
u seful
a nd
o ur
s pecialised
t eaching tool to the l ocal education
r epertoire. We are a society whose policy, endorsed
by
our
c lose
A rchaeological S ociety N ijmegen.
We
have
a nd
a ims and enthusiasm
a ssociation D r.
w ith
H ubrecht
c ooperated
and
worked
o f
t he
Upper
t he
K am
r eturned
t o
H olland
a nd
be N ene
M useum
with the Guildhall
M useum in Northampton and in our l atest major v enture we
c an
i n
1 986,
G ermany f or another l ecture tour
which coincided with f estivals of the Emperor Trajan 's b irthday. We do not intend in the above s tatement about a ims
p olicy,
a nd e xperiments to m islead anyone i nto thinking we are the
only g roup r esearch. s ocieties
o r
s ociety
i nvolved
i n
t his
o f
l ine
o f
p ractical
T he s ociety f reely a cknowledges the existence o f other a nd
i ndividuals
both
h ere
a nd
s imilar experiments of a practical nature , i nform
o ur
o ur
e xistence
i n
a broad t his
i s
e ngaged in m erely
t o
a n attempt to f orge constructive
l inks with l ike m inded workers.
1 08
" THE E VOLUTION O F CERTAIN F EATURES" M .C.
" My
c lassification
i s
B ishop
b ased on what I r egard a s t he
e volution of c ertain f eatures t he s eries." R OBINSON , F or
b etter o r worse,
1 975,
t hat
r ecur
t hroughout
4 6.
the s tudy of Roman m ilitary equipment
i s inextricably l inked to typological considerations. o f a ssemblages a re a lmost i nvariably drawn s cheme of c lassification ,
i nto
however r udimentary ,
Catalogues
s ome
s ort
o f
s o t hat questions
a bout t he way in which typologies a re f ormed and t he objectivity w ith
which
u sed,
are a s f undamental to our understanding of t his particular
t his
i s
done,
a long with t he way t he r esults are
a rea of a rtefact s tudies a s t hey a re to any other. o f
t he
f irst
a pproach.
c entury
I n
d oing
s upplementary , s uggested, o f
purpose
t his p aper i s t o probe some of the ways in which typological
s tudies have influenced our present v iew of o f
T he
A .D.
s o ,
m ilitary
e quipment
and t o a ssess t he v alidity of t his
a lternative
( in
r ather t han r eplacement)
t he
s ense
o f
interpretations will be
but i t w ill be n ecessary t o begin with
t he
b riefest
t humbnail sketches of some of the main i ssues t hat have c ome
t o be a ssociated with typology.
T HEORY The t heory c onsiderable
o f
d epth
typology
t hat
p rinciples
i nvolved.'
who was
t ypology,
f or
t ypology i tems
r ecently
by s cholars of t he
i s t o t hem C larke,
has
w e
m ust
t urn
Most
f or
a rtefacts
( the d ivision into
a s c oming i nto,
with a nd
t ypes)
f ast
r ate of adoption ,
d ecline. b lurred,
3
r ' esume
i s
o f
t he
i n
and i t basic
amongst t hese was D avid t he
c lassification
s ocieties.
and going out of,
a t ypical pattern i s t hat known a s
e xplored
' new a rchaeology' a
prominent
l argely concerned both
b een
of
D istinct f rom
2
s eriation ,
which
s ees
f ashion i n a known way;
' lenticular',
a period of maximum u se,
which
has
a
and t hen a l ong
T he d ifference between typology and s eriation i s often
b ut s eriation demands good dating evidence t o
c onvincing.
m ake
i t
4
A rtefacts ' attributes'
n umber
o f
- perhaps t he u se of a c ertain decorative motif
c an
be
d efined
i n
t erms
o f
a
o r
a p articular d imension - and i t i s t he c ombination of t hese that s erve t o c haracterise artefacts. 5 There a re a lso d ifferent kinds o f attribute: t he
i tem
( was
there a re t hose a ssociated with t he manufacture of i t c ast o r wrought?)
1 09
and t hose t hat c ome f rom the
way in which the object d ecoration
i s
was
u sed
( swords
a esthetically pleasing).
have
s harp
However ,
6
t o deciding which attributes are t o be u sed to f orm a t he
problems
b egin;
a ttributes which p robably ( e.g.
w ill
be
of
have sharp e dges), attributes
s ubjectivity into t he R obinson ,
a s
we
t ypology,
there will inevitably be a l arge number of l ittle
which
process
s aw
i n
a ssistance
( all
s words
so u seful a ttributes must be c hosen
t he shape of the sword blade)
' important'
e dges,
when i t c omes
and i t
i s
t hat
i ntroduces o f
t he
f orming
a n a
c hoice
of
e lement
t ypology.
of Thus
7
quotation at t he beginning, was
b asing his typology on what he regarded
a s
c ertain f eatures" common to a ll helmets;
t his of c ourse begs the
q uestion
o f
whether
b eing of importance.
a
t hat
e volution
o f
R oman would have s een s uch f eatures a s
8
C larke s aw t hat the best the m inimise
" the
s ubjective
c ompletely eradicate i t.
9
a rchaeologist
c omponent,
b ut
c ould
d o
was
i t i s i mpossible to
The question o f whether s uch
a
t hing
a s a ' natural'
typology c an exist has been widely d ebated 1 ° but,
i n
t his
the
end,
m ay not be the most productive approach and
e ventually we shall have to
c onsider
w hy
what
we
r egard
a s
t ypologies originated in t he f irst instance. There i s one f orm of typology that a pproaches our objective i deal and that i s one which we c an c all t he f unctional typology, which o f
d epends upon practical attributes n ot r elated to the whim
the
m anufacturer.
G roller's C arnuntum . a long
S uch
t ypologies
c lassification
of l orica
This was f ounded
1 1
upon
t he e dges of these objects,
a re
t ypified
s quamata
t he
a rrangement
n ine
c ategories 12
and,
l argely
v olume of evidence available to him , a ny
s ubsequent
d iscovered
c lassifications,
v on f rom
o f
holes
which were in t urn determined
by t he way in which the s cales were attached to e ach d efined
by
s cales
o ther.
H e
because of t he sheer
he s ucceeded i n pre-empting
s ince
n early
s ince have adhered to his s cheme.
1 3
a ll
s cales
N evertheless,
i t
s hould be s tressed t hat this i s purely c oincidental and that von G rolier a t no stage s et out to produce a ' universal'
typology of
s cales. U lbert's c lassification of g ladius t ypes 14 f unctional typology , P ompeii
t ypes
r elated t o t he i s
l argely
f orms, f rom
o f
with i ts d istinction between t he Mainz s word.
s peculation a t t he moment. f act
t hat
p articular blades.
and
I t i s a d ifference which may well be
f unction of the r espective blades,
on t he other hand, t he
i s e ssentially a
i s
c ertainly
a lthough
t his
T he wide r ange of s heath n ot
f unctional,
a part
t hey have to be t he r ight s hape f or t heir
1 5
S cott's e xamination of spearheads 16 t he f unctional approach,
i s another
e xample
of
a lthough t his e xample i s by no m eans a s
1 10
s traightforward
a s
t he
others.
c ertain types of shafted weapon l ancea)
and
I t
i s
c lear that there were
( notably
t he p ilum ,
b ut f inding a meaningful way of defining blade e lements
a re
p roblematical. s pearhead
s ignificant
i n
s hape
a nd
t hen
t he
however,
a esthetic
w ith
R obinson and i t must be i nherently
wrong,
t o
what i s
d escribe
particularly productive.
k ind,
a p articular s et of attributes, c hanged
and
analysed the r esults by computer;
t ime.
t he
was
upon
1 8
1 9
what
we
a rt-historical
s uch a s the arrangement of
or t he 2°
past
b ased
c onsiderations of f orm or decoration , a ttribute
a nd
d istinctions
t echniques
T he c ommonest f orm of typology i n t erm
s hape
f orming
D ensem u sed numerical
1 7
t his approach was not,
m ight
hasta,
t hat these could be d istinguished by t heir blades,
way
i n
which
a
g iven
T his was t he kind practised by
s tressed
t hat
t his
a pproach
i s
n ot
but i ts u se does r epay c loser examination and
we s hall l ook at s ome relevant examples in the n ext s ection . B ehind any attempt at typology , d etect
t he influence of a model:
a rtefacts s hould c ertain
b iases
s hare a re
s ubsequent analysis.
i t i s s eldom
a ttributes
i mplicit
d ifficult
t o
t he idea t hat an a ssemblage of
i n
i n
c ommon
both
On the one hand,
t he
c an
mean
typology
t hat
and i ts
we may s ay t hat there
a re
o nly s o many ways to f asten s cales together on a l orica s quamata s hirt,
o r t hat there i s a f inite r ange of spear s hapes t hat a re
u seful f or the tasks r equired of them ,
but to e xpect
a ttributes to behave in a certain way ,
e specially when spatially
r emote,
i s
d ecorative
t o presuppose a particular kind of s ystem producing
t hem - a lmost invariably a c entralised one.
2 1
However,
p repared to accept t hat this i s a prerequisite to the o f
a typology and a cknowledge i t a s s uch,
i f we a re f ormation
then i t n eed not be a
p roblem . O ne f inal idea r emains a nd
t hat i s t he
t o be considered
' mental template'.
2 2
i n
W ith t his,
t his
t he c raftsman carries within his head an i deal of object
whilst
what i t i s, e xact m ind,
2 3
of that i deal:
b ut
n ot
an
i deal
i n
t heir f inished products will only v ary a ccording to
s ubconscious; o thers
f inished
e ssentially t he P latonic notion of
I f a ll c raftsmen are working with the s ame
t hen
t heir p articular f oibles and o f
his
human n ature being
that f inished product i s an imitation ,
m atch,
m imesis.
he i s working on i t and that ,
s ection ,
we s uppose t hat
p references,
both
c onscious
a nd
but i f s ome are working with the f inished products
a s t heir i deal,
t hen they will not only be unable t o
m atch i t e xactly when t hey copy i t,
but will introduce their own
p ersonal e lement i nto i t;
( Fig.1).
and so on
1 11
MENTAL T EMPLATE
ARTEFACT 1
-
MENTAL
MENTAL
T EMPLATE
T EMPLATE
ARTEFACT
A
f r A c t ,
Fig.1:
The mental template and
t he
spread
of
i deas
amongst
military craftsmen
EXAMPLES OF PREVIOUS TYPOLOGIES At
t his
point
i t
will
be useful to examine a number of
typologies of Roman military equipment, c an
t ell
not only f or
u s about the artefacts in each case,
i nformation they contain
about
t he
way
in
what
t hey
but a lso f or the which
they
were
c onstructed. H .
Russell
Robinson's survey of Roman armour 24
contains a
n umber of typologies of d ifferent pieces of equipment, amongst
which
was
his
l engthy
s ection
on
t echnique he used i s most c learly demonstrated in I mperial-Gallic d ated pieces
helmets:
he
the
2 5
c ase
The of
t ook a number of archaeologically
and then proceeded to
and it i s here that the
f oremost
helmets.
l inbetween'
2 6
the
r emainder,
" evolution of certain f eatures" was used
t o determine the place of any one helmet within the structure of t he typology. n o
2 7
s ufficiently
Robinson i s
I n the case of l obate cuirass hinges 28 f ine
c hronological
t here are
f ixed points available,
so
forced to use traditional art-historical criteria to
i llustrate a supposed deterioration from e laborate, hinges to extremely crude and inelegant e xamples.
1 12
2 9
f inely made, The
d ating
evidence
f or
these
hinges,
however,
l east,
and s ince most of the hinges
small
span
of
t ime,
t he
i s ambiguous to s ay the
in question belong within
' typology'
c an
i nverted to show a progression f rom crude e laborate
a
quite plausibly be
hinges
t o
t he
more
3 0
That
being
s aid,
there
R obinson did i solate genuine e quipment,
but
i t
i s
i s
no
t rends
d isputing within
the f act that
various
kinds
of
t he interpretation of these trends with
which we are primarily concerned. A .
Böhme
harness
published
t hat
a lmost
bears
s olely
Ih erzblattförmig .
forms.
n umbers
of
t he
o r
b ird-headed
This
f or
s equence
typology
i t.
The
On
the
of
shape,
pendants,
There
3 2
f or,
horse
f rom
a s
i s
with
t he
t hrough ovoid, i gnores
t he
found in military contexts,
typology
s equence of development,
f rom
Böhme's approach i s based
3 1
a rchaeological dating information i s t o support
pendants
completely
l ess c ommon types.
the
of
evolution
l unate pendants
a s many of the basis
typology
c onsideration.
upon
' trifid'
a
n o
to
l arge as well
c hronological
l obate
hinges,
t he
insufficiently well-defined
appears
t o
present
a
l ogical
but in f act this i s an i llusion.
more positive s ide,
Lawson has produced a typology
that does not purport to show a logical progression of any kind, but merely classifies the range of available types of pendant. A s imilar approach was Witteveen
i n
N etherlands, dated,
as
their
adopted
by
Z adoks-Josephus
c atalogue
of
l unate
commenting that
3 4
" they
be
path
t o
pursue,
' development',
i f
t hat i s what it i s,
c hronological,
and not spatial,
upon
we
whether
helmet designs, ( in
c hose
t o
o ther
words,
d ifferent
a s
t emplate).
Although we may
command was
we
have
s ee n
t he
i dea
that
the
Again,
this
d epends
over
units'
in
t he
t ime
helmets f rom
and
over
will show a
c ommon
d iscussion of the mental
j ust be able to accept that a central
shape
f rom on high;
the
even if taken
controlling helmet shape
t hat
a
a central authority dictating
progression
c orrespondingly d iffering trends, original,
f ace of it,
i s genuinely a result of
s eparation.
s ee
or a n atural
3 5
t here are dangers inherent in the
a ssumptions that have to be made - such as
d ictated
the
typologically
Whilst the method used by Robinson i s, on the
u nlikely
f rom
t hey show v ariation but no definite development".
r easonable
space
and
pendants
c annot
3 3
J itta
of
there
( and decoration?),
l obate must
be
c uirass hinges another,
more
3 6
i t
i s
should be l ogical,
e xplanation. Two
o f
Robinson's dated Imperial-Gallic helmets came f rom
t he Sheepen s ite t raditional
at
C olchester 37
e xplanation
that
and
R obinson
f ollowed
the
t hese entered the archaeological
1 13
record as a
d irect
equipment in the S heepen
was
result
o f
colonists
hurriedly
f ace of the Boudican rebellion.
probably
a
Roman
m ilitary s ite 39
and that these
helmet f ragments need not be associated with the m ight be earlier i s of l ittle help e ither way, the difficulties Any
producing
The f act that
3 8
r ebellion
and
but does point up
inherent in archaeological dating evidence.
attempt
at
s eriation
o r
the
f ormation
4°
of
c hronologically-based typology i s dependent upon the quality our
d ating
evidence.
I n the
periods of Roman history , m ight
u sefully
f irst century A .D.,
we are subject to
be termed chronological
a
occupation
( in f act,
phenomenon
' clustering';
of
s ites
i n
A .D.40 45 42
the
Voralpenland
Mainz),
s ubsequent Batavian V indonissa,
t he
these changes, in
t o
A . D.101.
' events':
( Bregenz,
r evolt
events
in
as well a s the Thus,
and all
a f ew categories.
o f
A . D.68-71.
contents of the
45
inconsistent
the
43
be
a t the end of a phase of the
The f irst
abandonment
Kempten ,
Salzburg)
and movements that f ollowed the invasion of
( Vindonissa,
that
this i s a
at the moment of abandonment 41 ) .
c entury i s marked by a s eries of such
o f
as with other
r esult of the way in which Roman military equipment came deposited in the archaeological record,
a
the
c ivil I n
44
' Schutthügel'
in
B ritain war
the
and
c ase
of
probably reflect
f inal abandonment of that fortress
our
c hronological
i nformation
i s
f inds are bound to f all within one of only
Quite s imply,
there
i s
l ittle
basis
f or
a
c hronological typology. One work
of the prime requirements
i s
t hat
development,
t here but
s hould
for d ecorative typologies to some
t he mechanisms
in the ancient world. army,
be
and
manufacture
S allustius Lucullus, equipment
are
of
empire-wide
There was no central command in the
other than the emperor himself,
design
s ort
for this clearly did not exist
4 7
were
t raditionally a ssumed.
t o
be
f ar
R oman
and matters of equipment
c learly a l egionary
an army-group)
bound
46
concern, more
With these thoughts
( or,
so trends
parochial in mind,
a s with within t han
i t
i s
i s now
t ime to consider some new typologies.
SOME NEW TYPOLOGIES OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT As
has
a rchaeologists pointed
out,
been i s
pointed out,
i t i s possible
s ubjective element, e lusive.
There are,
variations
( indeed desirable)
but true
f unctional typology, t he
objectivity
however ,
typologies
As
C larke
has
to minimise
t his
n evertheless
r emains
different s pecies of typology:
where l ogical explanations are evident
embodied
within
typologies where such reasons ' valid'
the production of typologies by
e ssentially a s ubjective task.
-
in
a rtefacts,
or
can be suggested might
other 1 14
words,
the f or
d ecorative be
t ermed
a ssemblages where the
5
Fig.2:
Types of phalera .f astening
1 15
process of taxonomy i s g enuine
phenomenon.
s eek to do t he
worthwhile ' Invalid'
s ame,
b ut
t o
d istinguish
a
s purious
i s
a
on t he other hand,
g rounds;
p attern within i ts b ehaviour.
any s ense of the word,
d efining i f
a
g iven
then there i s l ittle point in t rying
t hat are u sed here a s e xamples are not,
1 .
i t
typologies,
on
a ttribute varies at random ,
because
The typologies
t herefore,
definitive in
but merely i llustrative of t he process.
' Valid Typologies' I n t his investigation
o f
v alid
t ypologies,
i t
w ill
be
u seful to begin with a s imple example of t he f unctional typology t hat i s i ndependent of any decorative criteria. a )
P halera Fastenings The
r ecent
c entury
d etailed
c avalry
knowledge
o f
publication
e quipment
has
e xtended
t ook
t he f orm of either a r ing or a phalera. 49
Whilst
d iscs
d ecorative s chemes,
s trap
C rucial to which
t hese
t he
o ur
j unction ,
t he f ront f aces of e laborate
two hoards of f irst
t he workings of Roman horse harness. 48
t he f unctioning of the harness was n ormally
o f
c onsiderably
c ould
c ontain
a
v ariety
o f
the s uspension system at t he rear
a lways had to conform to i ts f unctional r equirements. S mall phalerae might u se only a s imple f lat t hem
onto
ones had, c ould
t he
l eather
in addition ,
be
a ttached
s trapping
( Fig .2,1).
( Fig.2,3).
Another
( Fig.2,2).
Even
5 1
l arger
t ype
i ncorporate
e ither
The arrangement of i s
p endant
e xamples
a lso
j unction-loops
were
t rue
t hree
s trap
t hese
j unctions.
( Fig .2,4)
d ifferent
or f our
T hese
( Fig.2,5)
5 3
t ypes
o f
l oops
and
r elated to t he role played by t he phalera within the
harness.
That i s why i t i s a f unctional t ypology
t o
d ecorative
any
T he next l arger
of phalera does not u se f lat l oops t o attach
l oops t o which j unction-loops are attached.
hinges
hold
5 2
t hem to s traps because t hese are u sually
t o
a hinge at the bottom to which a
i ncorporated two l oops a t the top to which f astened
5°
l oop
t ypologies
which
a nd
u nrelated
m ay also apply t o one of
t hese objects. b )
B elt plates There are two d ifferent,
d istinctions p lates. p lates
t hat
F irst, s eem
motif-embossed, i s
a
d egree
b ut
not
u nrelated,
t here are three broad categories i nto t o
f it:
t hese
c omprise
and roundel-embossed plates of
t ypological
c an be made in the c ase of pre-Antonine belt
o verlap
t he
which
a ll
n iello-inlaid,
( Fig.3,1-3).
T here
amongst these c lasses which makes
1 16
i t
1& " r i i e s 5 l i 1
2
r e
. , . el
3
r trr rr-re-r-r A il o
r
0
tr ,
1 11 1tAilA1 . 4
4
5
6
F ig.3:
B elt plates
7
( scale 1 :2)
[
£f l atY M ,• ,: f .Y .t .Y .T .Y
i e
X
$f Pf tP
* \
0 . - ( -b i
W I OHO
Pe )g
2
6
0
. 49C 4 '4 . *. 1 01 , *4 •1 . '1 :
3
4
7
8
i '
X xxxxxx.o
X b ,
9
' X X XX X
1
1 0
1 2 e n b
Fig.4:
' St.Andrew 's C ross'
1 17
belt p lates
( scale 1 :2)
d esirable t o go
f urther
a nd
break
o ne
e xample
d own
e ach
of
t hem
i nto
s ub-groups. T aking d iscussion ,
j ust
the n iello-inlaid belt plates include a s eries
a v arying number of t hat
' St.
Andrew 's c ross'
w ithin the s ub-group with two
a re even more s ub-types c )
f or t he purposes of the present motifs
' St. Andrew 's c rosses'
( Fig.4,1-12).
with
( Fig.3,4-7),
and
there
5 4
P endants The l unula
p endant o rigin
types o f
f unction
( Fig.5,1) was one of the e arliest and
horse d efines
was harness s ome
d ecoration.
o ther
i ncorporating a prominent b ird-headed s ymbolism
R omano-Celtic
probably connected with the apotropaic t ypes
phallic
5 5
T his
s uperstitious
o f pendant,
motif
s uch a s t hose
( Fig.5,2),
5 6
or
t he
p endants with their possible connection with C eltic
( birds being l inked with
C eltic
Mars
-
F ig.5,3).
5 7
L ater pendants i ncorporated decoration a ssociated with f ertility p rimarily v iticulture or the a corn pun on g lans
-
n evertheless
betrays
e xamined closely
F ig.5,4).
5 8
This
( and its v isual and v erbal
l atter ,
s ophisticated
f orm
i ts origin in the humble l unula when i t i s
( Fig.6).
5 9
2
4
3
Fig.5:
P endants
1 18
( scale 1 :2)
7
\
2
/ 7
fr1
1
2 F ig.6:
T he r elationship between l unula and t rifid pendants
1 19
2 .
' Invalid Typologies°
' Lorica s egmentata'
f ittings
T o be able to f ollow Robinson
i n
s equence amongst c uirass f ittings t hem
a s a ' valid typology'),
m echanism
whereby
s imilarity
t o
t hey
e ach
c entral authority m anufacturers
a
typological
to categorise
we need to be able to describe the
a chieved
other.
d ictate
d efining
( in other words, t heir
T here s uch
i s
v arious
v ariations
o f the objects themselves,
of purely decorative items s uch a s
d egrees
i n
s hape
t o
o f
c raftsmen
l obate hinges. An a lternative
c oncerned.
s ome
o f these objects,
t o
Whatever the r easons,
c ertainly possible to i solate attributes t hat c lassify
t he
e specially in t he case
approach i s t o a scribe variations in shape or crudeness a bilities
of
l ittle s ense in having a
c an
be
t he i t i s
u sed
t o
at the s ame time a s exercising
c aution with others. a )
Lobate hinges I t would s eem that the f orm of the l obes and the
o f these objects c annot be u sed to c lassify t hem ; c ut
f rom
a
double thickness sheet of c opper a lloy
85 /1 5 brass 6 ° ), d ue
t o
t he
( Fig.7,1-9).
( usually an
s o variations in s uch attributes may
s kill
and
Likewise,
e xperience
s houlders
they had t o be b e
s olely
of t he craftsman concerned
the presence o r absence of s tamped
r ings
a round t he r ivet holes does not appear to be very u seful i n this r espect
( Fig.7,5
s houlders
o f
d ifficult
t o
However, and
&
1 1).
The t riangular openings between the
6 1
t hese
h inges may be s ignificant, but i t i s Fig.7,10-15) . 62 s ay in what way this might be so (
there i s d efinitely a distinction between
t hose
f rom Carnuntum
,13-15), ( Fig. 7
most
hinges
particularly in overall
obes. s ize and the pointed nature of the l b )
H inged stran Again ,
but
l itt
f l 1c
these f orm a f airly homogeneous g roup by and
t here s eems t o be a d efinite D anubian s tyle s imilar t o that
hinted at i n t he l obate hinges. f atter
t han
t hose
may be one type
F ittings
( Fig.8,1-4),
another
f rom
f orm
( Fig.8,5-7). S trasbourg
d ecorative r ings and t he roundness o r c ommon varieties
a re
l arger
( Fig.8,9-16)
T here
s quareness
o f
T he more c ommon r ectangular f orms
f rom t he Rhineland and B ritain , ( Fig.9,5-8).
Other,
l obate m ore
b e
Again ,
t he
more
once again possibly
r eflecting a d ifference between Rhineland and D anube
e xamples which have a
m ay
( Fig.8,8).
do not appear to be d iagnostic.
H inged buckle f ittings Two main t ypes may be d iscerned here,
e quipment.
and
whilst e xamples with t he suggestion
another
u nusual
t hat
c ommonly f ound in t he Rhineland and B ritain
o f a l obate o rigin may be
c )
l arge,
a rmy-group
( Fig.9,1-4),
again
d iffer notably f rom the D anubian p late
m inor,
1 20
a ttached
t o
t he
c uirass
variations s uch a s decorative
1 5
1 4
1 3
1 2
1
1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
MCb
Fig.7:
' Lorica s egmentata'
l obate hinges
( scale 1 :2)
0
3
2
5
7
6
4
8
0 9
1
1 0
1 2
, C *0 C D@ 1 1 3
F ig.8:
1 5
1 4
' Lorica s egmentata' hinged strap f ittings
1 21
1 6
( scale 1 :2)
0
5
Fig.9:
2
3
4
6
7
8
' Lorica s egmentata' hinged buckle f ittings
r ings and the rounding of corners are
p robably
( scale 1 :2)
o nce
a gain
o f
l ittle i mportance. d ) Cuirass t ie-hooks A
v ariety
o f
f orms
a re f ound,
s traight ( or s lightly
t apered)
( Fig.10,1-4),
g roup
b ut
a
a gain) have a r emarkable bottle;
t hey
a lso
p late
f rom
' waisted' have
t he most c ommon being the w ith
r ounded
t he D anube
f orm s imilar t o
v ery
g ently
s houlders
( mainly C arnuntum a
C oca-Cola
s loping
s houlders
( Fig. 1 0,5-8).
2
3
0 5
6
4
r
)
C ° 0
7
8 m cb
Fig.10:
' Lorica s egmentata'
t ie hooks
( scale 1 :2)
TYPOLOGICAL STUDIES AND THEIR USES The embossed belt plates mentioned . above are one example of t he way
i n
which
t hese
t ypologies 1 22
m ay
be
o f
u se
t o
u s.
E xamination
of
a
d istribution
f ound in U pper Germany , G ermany
( Fig.11).
f airly
w ell
V indonissa
map s hows that they are mainly
with a f ew outliers in Britain and Lower
T he dating of these particular belt plates
known ,
( c.A .D.45
i s
g iven t heir presence in the S chutthügel at -
a bandonment
o f l egio
XIII
G emina),
6 3
a ssociated with t he end o f P hase I a a t Valkenburg ( c.A.D. 4 0/1)64, and ( less c ertainly), the abandonment of R ißtissen and O berstimm
i n
A .D.69 65
and of the s outh-western f orts of Waddon
a nd Hod H ill at some point between A .D.55 and 7 5.
6 6
2-5
2 -5
•
0
Fig.11:
1 00
2 00
3 00
47 0
Km
T he d istribution of embossed belt plates
By f ar t he most interesting characteristic of these i s
t heir g eographical spread:
a nd i t was a l egion f rom that army-group i nvolved
i n
t he
( II Augusta)
i nvasion of B ritain
a s a s tarting point , t he
way
t o
a pparently d ate 68 w ith
only
6 7
The
B ritain ,
Upper
with
preparations
f or
a s an intermediate s tage on
f act
t hat
t hese
p lates
a re
a t s ites with a pre-Boudican f oundation
may indicate that they enjoyed t he
was
( either because Gaius planned t o u se i t
or more l ikely ,
Boulogne). f ound
t hat
s outh-western c ampaigns in Britain; moreover ,
Valkenburg has been d irectly a ssociated t he
p lates
most are known f rom Upper G ermany
a
d egree
o f
popularity
G erman t roops s ome t ime before t he invasion of
but that t heir popularity was waning by the t ime of the
c onquest and they e ventually d isappeared. Amongst the many types of pendant,
one of the most s triking
i s t he bird-headed and particularly t he l arger a re
v ery
s tylised
d istinctive, b eaks
a nd
with their l ooped
e yes
( Fig.12).
1 23
s pecimens.
T hey
' feathered' heads with
Once
again ,
s tudying
a
I neb
Fig.12: A l arge 1 :2)
' bird-headed'
p endant f rom C irencester ( scale
F ig.13: The d istribution of f igured Thracian c avalry and
' bird-headed'
pendants in B ritain
1 24
t ombstones
d istribution e specially
map i n
d istribution
hints
a t
c onnection o f
t he
s ome
with
i nteresting
B ritain.
c onclusions,
C omparison
o f
f ew s amples known f rom this province with
t hat of e arly tombstones a ssociated with Thracian units a
c ertain
d egree of coincidence in the pattern
a re f ar t oo f ew e xamples of e ither a llow
a nything
c oncrete,
but
p endants
r eveals
( Fig.13).
o r
There
t ombstones
t o
we might s ee this a s a possible
i ndication of ethnic specificity amongst t he Thracian c avalry.
t he
a uxiliary
6 9
T his
i s
a ll
v ery
f orward here may even w arnings
t hat
must
s ample,
even f or
s eldom
l arge
i nterpretations f or
p erception
be
enough
and
Next,
r e-emphasised. c ommon
a s was
a re
F irst ,
i tems
admitted
i nterpret o f
a lternative s uggestions i nterpretation
t here
l ike Robinson 's,
t o
u se
but
a
number
o f
t he s ize of our
l ike
p endants,
i s
t o f orm a statistically v iable s ample and
a re, u se
and some of t he s uppositions put
t rue,
r elatively
a re t hus s uspect. s elected
w ell,
be
t he
m ilitary and
e arlier, f irst
present
c entury
e quipment.
not
t he
dependent upon the model T hus
r eplacements:
army's
t hese
t he
a re
objective
o f typological data r emains e lusive f or t he time
b eing.
F UTURE WORK S pecificity - r elating certain variants of a g iven p iece of e quipment t o certain units - would d eserves
f urther
r esearch.
b est t o t reat i t a s t he
c orpus i t
of known
c an
be
d etritus,
l egions, when
e pigraphic kind,
a s i t must do in t he
c ould
be
m ore
d efinite
i s l acking.
' masters'
f rom
possibly even
t heir
e vidence,
i ntelligence'. s tructure
o f an
w ith
m aterial
e specially the
I t
hopefully ,
m ight
be
of t he
possible
r eveals t he
t o
working in a particular s tyle at a particular
i n
t he
f ield
o f
t ypological
by
' artificial
may
b e
E ven
most
c ursory
t he
' expert s ystem ',
7 0
p resented
t axonomy
e xamination
o f
t he
a program t hat makes decisions
( or l ogical deductions) based upon the information a re present.
the
S uch a t ool would profoundly affect
An interesting development a nd
a s
f uture.
however ,
a s c an be done with S amian ware to a c ertain extent.
s tudies
i t,
t hat
m ind
f orseeable
army-groups,
t raced
w ay i n which i ts c raftsmen thought. i solate
i dea
i t i s probably
t o be a g enuine phenomenon ,
o ur understanding of the army's movements and,
t ime,
an
( and published) military equipment of this
s hown
e ven
be
More r ealistically ,
p ossibilities are e xtremely e xciting: p articular
t o
j ust one possibility to be kept in
p eriod g rows s teadily , I f
s eem
s upplied
t o
t hat t he e ssential e lements f or f orming a typology 7 1
P ast types could be f ed into t he
r ules
t hat
d efine
t he type-groups,
1 25
machine,
a long
and the machine
would
then
t heoretically
automatically.
Although
dependent upon the object,
be
able
t o
c lassify
n ew
i tems
d ata-entry i s c lumsy at the moment and
entry
of
a
d igitised
d escription
of
the development of artificial s ensing devices and shape
recognition
are
f undamental
t o
c urrent
work
i n
artificial
i ntelligence and are directly relevant to such a proposa1. Whilst this necessary
intervention, t hem
i t
on
analyses
may
prove
without
t o
t he
data,
be
ability to define rules
Even with the not
C larke said 74 in
a
n eed
u seful
f or
a id
t hem
f or
t he
a s appropriate.
The
of
7 3
artificial
i ntelligence,
i t
will
possible to achieve the ultimate objectivity.
" the real basis of objectivity i s to be
narrowly
human
in this way can only benefit typological
a id
be
a
the
f or his own typologies and
modifying
work on Roman military equipment.
probably
7 2
i s unlikely to l ead to computers performing all
typological
archaeologist to use to draw up rules t est
an
a rbitrary
c onfined and defined manner" and that i s s urely
the best we can hope for.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am
extremely
Coulston,
and
my
g rateful w ife,
t o
Martha
L indsay Andrews,
commented upon earlier drafts of this u sually
a cted
upon their advice,
Allason-Jones, who
p aper.
a ll
r ead
A lthough
I
Jon and have
they should in no way be held
responsible for the contents.
NOTES 1 .
A thumbnail sketch can be found in GREENE, 1 00-3;
t he process of
SMITH, 2 . 3 .
1976,
CLARKE, I bid. death,
2 05-13.
1983,
' building a typology'
3 2-4
and
i s outlined in
S ee also DORAN & HODSON ,
1975,
1 61-7.
1 978.
1 51-2.
CLARKE
l ikened this to
calling i t the
4 .
Cf.
i bid.
5 .
I bid.
1 53-4.
6 .
Ibid.
1 53.
7 .
Ibid.
1 55.
b irth,
m aturity ,
" ontogeny of t he entity"
Fig.47.
1 26
( ibid.
and 1 80).
8 .
We
may
l egitimately
evolution
of
wonder,
' eyebrows'
( ROBINSON ,
1 975,
phenomenon.
Would a Roman
4 6
f or
on
i nstance,
whether the
I mperial-Gallic
F igs.52-61)
i s
c raftsman
helmets
a real or perceived have
been
aware
of
this? 9 .
CLARKE,
1978,
1 0.
H ILL & EVANS,
1 1.
R LÖ I I,
1 2.
I bid.
1 3.
A
1 54. 1 972.
86.
Taf.XV ,I-IX.
s cale
f rom
ST.JOSEPH,
1974,
whilst some Fig.7)
i st
c entury
Fig.27,35)
A .D.
i s of
Longthorpe
von
f rom early 3 rd century A .D.
are of Type
( FRERE
Groller's Carpow
Type
( WILD ,
& V ,
1981,
IV.
1 4.
ULBERT,
1969a.
1 5.
A classified catalogue of sheaths & HARTMANN ,
1 984,
40-3.
i s presented in ETTLINGER
I am grateful to Prof.
W . H.
Manning
f or bringing this paper to my attention. 1 6.
SCOTT,
1980.
1 7.
Terms
l ike
' leaf-shaped'
are unhelpful,
s ince leaves are
f ound in an extraordinary variety of shapes. metaphor
c an
' pinnate'
or
be
The
pursued,
however ,
and
t erms
' lanceolate'
adopted,
but
s ome
botanical s uch s ort
numerical description s eems unavoidable - s ee BARKER , 1 8.
DENSEM ,
1976.
1 9.
ORTON,
1 980,
5 4-62
provides
a s of
1975.
a useful review of the main
r esults. 2 0.
C f.
GREENE,
2 1.
Consider
1 983,
Fig.13.
' lorica segmentata'
s imilar,
l obate hinges:
but f ew excavated examples
- why? The processes governing
t he
t hey
( if any)
a re
a ll
are identical
invention ,
r etention ,
and d issimulation of even s uch a s imple object as this hint at
a
d egree of a complexity about which the archaeologist
can only begin to guess. 2 2.
CLARKE,
1978,
Chapman's
1 53 with
c omments
this approach a s
on
F ig.48;
cf.
ibid.
2 02-3
n .1
f or
the description by Hill & Evans of
' empiricist'.
1 27
2 3.
Republic X ,1.
2 4.
ROBINSON ,
2 5.
Ibid.
2 6.
1975.
Part 1 ,
1 1-144.
A term used in with
two
produce the f irst
computer
d issimilar
animation
images,
t echniques:
t he
c omputer
l inking s equence of frames
into
t he
s econd,
t hus
t hat
presented
proceeds converts
t o the
providing smooth animation
without the necessity to redraw each f rame manually. 2 7.
ROBINSON ,
1975,
2 8.
Ibid.
Fig.182.
2 9.
Ibid.
181-2.
3 0.
The wide range of shapes difficulties
46.
f rom any one
inherent
here,
f rom t he Corbridge Hoard underline this 3 1. 3 2.
A .
and
( report
s ite
hints
a t
the
t he range on the armour f orthcoming)
s erves
t o
impression.
Böhme in SCHÖNBERGER ,
Other
types
these
c onstitute
include a
1978,
Abb.73.
l unulae, not
teardrop ,
inconsiderable
phallic
f orms and
proportion
of
pendants r ecovered f rom the archaeological record. 3 3.
LAWSON ,
1978,
3 4.
ZADOKS-JOSEPHUS JITTA & WITTEVEEN ,
3 5.
I bid.
3 6.
Cf.
3 7.
ROBINSON ,
3 8.
HAWKES
1 977.
1 76.
B ISHOP,
1985,
1 975,
1 3 with n .113.
F igs.84-92.
H ULL,
1 947,
3 9-40;
G .
W ebster in N IBLETT,
1985,
1 14. 3 9.
F ITZPATRICK,
4 0.
C .F.C. at
1986.
Hawkes
l east
one
( in TODD , phase
1985, of
1 92-5) has pointed
t he
military
post-date the Boudican rebellion. 4 1.
B ISHOP,
1985,
8-9;
1986,
7 21-2.
1 28
out
o ccupation
that c ould
4 2.
B regenz:
WELLS ,
8 0-81; Kempten:
1 969,
d ispositions,
s ee F ILTZINGER ,
4 3.
V indonissa:
4 4.
I bid.
4 5.
1 972,
SCHÖNBERGER ,
I t
1 51.
SCHÖNBERGER ,
F or
a 1983,
1 969,
ibid.
u seful
1 53;
8 1-3; map
S alzburg: of
t hese
f rontpapers. Mainz:
l oc.
c it.
1 55.
s eems
t hat
material f rom the occupation of l egio X III
G emina was deposited in the
' Keltengraben '
4 3)
before their s econd fortress was
he
S chutthügel
XXI
R apax,
c onstructed,
c ontained material f rom the
and X I C laudia,
f rom e ast to west d eposits
( HARTMANN ,
( ibid.
a ccumulated
apparently dumped
9 4).
1 986 ,
whilstt
l egiones X III, progressively
I t i s not clear whether these
g radually or in a number of distinct
' events'. 4 6.
CAMPBELL ( 1975;
1984)
has
m ilitares
s hown
t hat
and
c onsidered t here
t he
s o-called v iri
was a strong e lement of
amateurism in t he Roman m ilitary system . 4 7.
S uetonius Domit.
1 0,3.
4 8.
D oorwerth:
4 9.
T he f unctions of the various e lements of horse harness
BROUWER ,
1982;
c onsidered in B ISHOP,
Xanten: JENKINS,
1985.
f orthcoming.
5 0.
BROUWER ,
1982,
Taf.1,106b;
JENKINS,
1985,
F ig.11.
5 1.
BROUWER ,
1982,
T af.3,147b;
JENKINS,
1985,
F ig.8.
5 2.
BROUWER ,
1 982,
Taf.1,138b;
JENKINS,
1 985,
F ig.4.
5 3.
T hree
r ings:
F ig.5;
f our
1 985, 5 4.
BROUWER , r ings:
a re
1 982,
BROUWER ,
Taf.2,140b; 1 982,
JENKINS,
T af.2,144b;
1 985,
JENKINS,
F ig.6.
N eedless
t o
s ay ,
s ince
s o
f ew
e xamples of belt plates
s urvive compared to the presumed original population ,
many
s ub-types are r epresented by only one plate. 5 5.
C f.
B ISHOP,
5 6.
JOHNS,
5 7.
R OSS,
1982, 1 967,
f orthcoming. 6 3-4 & 7 3. 3 42 - the horse and the goose symbolized Celtic
Mars.
1 29
5 8.
P endants such as those decoration
from Doorwerth or Xanten have relief
of oakleaf and acorn motifs,
but inlaid designs
recalling viticulture. 5 9.
The
l unula
i s
WITTEVEEN , 6 0.
d ealt
with
by
ZADOKS-JOSEPHUS
J ITTA
1977.
Orichalcum;
the
z inc/copper
m ixture
probably
v aried
a ccording to the method of manufacture of a f itting. 6 1.
Most r ings appear to be stamped.
worth
noting
that
many objects published with no r ings
in their illustrations
will
r ings d id
sometimes
r eveal
t hat
examination of the actual 6 2.
I t i s
I t i s not a temporal Fig.182); Hoard
one
had
of
been
e xist
upon
item.
f eature, the
s uch
as
R OBINSON
cuirass
r epaired
t hought
( 1975,
e lements in the Corbridge
with
s uch
a
hinge
( report
f orthcoming). 6 3.
RE
' legio'
6 4.
GLASBERGEN & GROENMAN-VAN WAATERINGE,
6 5.
Cf.
6 6.
For doubts about the traditional terminal date of Hod Hill,
SCHÖNBERGER ,
s ee TODD , 6 7.
1 713.
1982,
1969,
1974,
39.
155.
5 3-4.
B ut s ee DE WEERD ,
1977 for a strong case against the direct
involvement of Valkenburg I in the British expedition. 6 8.
Which
may
s uggest that they only enjoyed a brief spell of
popularity. 6 9.
These
pendants,
C irencester
or
parts
( LYSONS,
1 817,
F ig.6,141),
Colchester
Fig.8,256), Oberstimm
of
( WACHER & MCWHIRR , P l.XV ,10),
Aislingen
( SCHÖNBERGER ,
1980,
( ibid.,
7 0.
BULMER ,
7 1.
C f.
7 2.
BLAKE,
7 3.
B ISHOP & THOMAS,
1978,
1 984.
1985. 1984,
6 1.
1 30
a re
known
Fig.36,100),
L ondon Fig.4,69),
( ULBERT,
3 8-42.
B ISHOP & THOMAS,
t hem , 1982,
f rom
Kingsholm
( WEBSTER , Wroxeter
1 959,
Taf.23, B189).
1 960, ( ibid.,
T af.21,17),
and
7 4.
C LARKE,
1 978,
1 54.
1 31
APPENDIX: F ig.3:
SOURCES OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Belt plates
1 .
Hod Hill
2 .
Rißtissen
( BRAILSFORD , ( ULBERT,
3 .
Rheingönheim
4 .
Hod Hill
5 .
Hofheim
( ULBERT,
( RITTERLING,
Vindonissa
( FELLMANN ,
Vindonissa
( UNZ,
' St.
1962, 1 913,
7 .
Colchester Sheepen
2 .
Rheingönheim
Taf.XII,7) Abb.28, b)
Abb.7,38)
cross'
1 .
Taf.27,3) Fig.4, A109)
1 954,
1 973,
Andrew 's
Fig.4, A112)
Taf.1,1)
1969b,
( BRAILSFORD ,
6 .
F ig.4:
1962,
1 970,
belt plates
( HAWKES & HULL,
( ULBERT,
3 .
Hofheim
Colchester Sheepen
5 .
Strasbourg
( FORRER ,
1927,
Taf.LXXVII,29)
6 .
Strasbourg
( FORRER ,
1927,
Taf. LXXVII,28)
7 .
Mainz
8 .
Vindonissa
9 .
Rheingönheim
( BEHRENS,
Ham Hill
Rheingönheim Oberstimm
1954,
Pl.CII,17)
Abb.28,c)
1969b,
1960,
( ULBERT,
Taf.27,20)
Fig.5,120)
1969b,
( SCHÖNBERGER ,
Taf.27,18)
1978,
Taf.22,B146)
Pendants
1 .
Baden
( UNZ,
2 .
Mainz
( BEHRENS,
3 .
Besançon
4 .
Doorwerth
1 .
1947,
Abb.4,23)
( ULBERT,
( WEBSTER ,
1 1.
F ig.7:
1912,
Pl.C,39)
Taf.XII,4)
( HAWKES & HULL,
( FELLMANN ,
1 2.
F ig.5:
1 913,
1947,
Taf.27,21)
4 .
1 0.
( RITTERLING,
1969b,
1971,
Abb.5,44)
1918,
( FEUGERE , ( BROUWER ,
Abb.10,5)
1 983,
' Lorica s egmentata'
The Lunt
( HOBLEY,
F ig.25,a)
1982,
Taf.3,147)
l obate hinges
1 973,
F ig.23,36)
2 .
Rheingönheim
( ULBERT,
1 969b,
Taf.33,17)
3 .
Rheingönheim
( ULBERT,
1 969b,
Taf.33,16)
4 .
Longthorpe
( FRERE & ST.JOSEPH,
( NISSEN et a l.,
1 902,
1 974,
F ig.26,17)
5 .
Neuß
6 .
Oberstimm
( SCgÖNBERGER ,
1 978,
Taf.XXX,81) Taf.20,B81)
1978,
Taf.20,B78)
7 .
Oberstimm
( SCHÖNBERGER ,
8 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XVII,23)
9 .
R ißtissen
( ULBERT,
1970,
Taf.4,83)
1 0.
R ißtissen
( ULBERT,
1970,
Taf.3,63)
1 1.
Hofheim
( RITTERLING,
1 913,
Taf.XI,6)
1 2.
Hod Hill
1 3.
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,57)
1 4.
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,58)
1 5.
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,59)
F ig.8:
( RICHMOND,
IL orica
1 968,
Fig.56,9)
segmentata' hinged strap f ittings
1 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,48)
2 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XVIII,36) Taf.XIX,47)
3 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
4 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,58)
5 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,54)
6 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,46)
7 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XIX,49)
8 .
Strasbourg
9 .
London
( FORRER,
( WEBSTER ,
1 0.
Ham Hill
1 1. 1 2.
1927,
1960,
Taf.LXXVII,25)
Fig.6,162)
( WEBSTER ,
1960,
Fig.5,126)
R ißtissen
( ULBERT,
1 959,
Taf.61,9)
R ißtissen
( ULBERT,
1970,
Taf.3,49)
1 3.
Oberstimm
( SCHÖNBERGER ,
1978,
Taf.20,B88)
1 4.
Oberstimm
( SCHÖNBERGER ,
1978,
Taf.20,B89)
1 5.
Hod Hill
1 6.
Rheingönheim
F ig.9:
( RICHMOND,
IL orica
1968,
( ULBERT,
Fig.56,12)
1969b,
Taf.33,1)
s egmentata' hinged buckle f ittings
1 .
London
2 .
Rheingönheim
( WEBSTER ,
3 .
Chichester
4 .
Vindonissa
5 .
R ißtissen
6 .
S isek
1960,
( ULBERT,
Fig.6,159) 1 969b,
( DOWN & RULE, ( UNZ,
1 973,
( ULBERT,
( HOFFILLER ,
Taf.33,23)
1971,
Fig.8.15,21)
Abb.9,90)
1 970, 1912,
Taf.3,44) S 1.11)
7 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XVIII,44)
8 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XVIII,41)
F ig.10:
' Lorica
1 .
Hod Hill
2 .
Rheingönheim
3 .
R ißtissen
4 .
Hod Hill
s e2mentata'
( RICHMOND ,
1 968,
( ULBERT,
( ULBERT, ( RICHMOND,
tie hooks Fig.56,13)
1969b,
1970, 1968,
Taf.34,51)
Taf.3,72) Fig.56,14)
5 .
Carnuntum
( PLO I I,
Taf.XVII,255)
6 .
Carnuntum
( PLO I I,
Taf.XVII,258)
7 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XVII,256)
8 .
Carnuntum
( RLÖ I I,
Taf.XVII,253)
F ig.11:
The distribution SCHÖNBERGER ,
F ig.12:
Large
of
1978,
' bird-headed'
1 982,
embossed
b elt
plates
( based
on
Abb.76)
pendant
( after
WACHER & MCWHIRR ,
Fig.36,100)
B IBLIOGRAPHY BARKER 1 975: weapon
P .C.
Archaeology, BEHRENS 1912: Mainzer B EHRENS
Barker,
points'
Laflin
( ed.),
( Birmingham 1975),
G .
Behrens,
Z eitschrift,
1 918:
' An exact method
in S .
G .
1912,
B ehrens,
Legionskastell Mainz',
d escribing
i ron
3 -8
' Neue Funde aus 7 ,
of
computer Applications in
d em
Kastell
Mainz',
8 2-109
' Neue
u nd
a ltere
Mainzer Z eitschrift,
F unde 1 2-13,
a us dem 1 917-18,
2 1-46 B ISHOP
1 985:
M .C.
B ishop,
production of arms ( ed.),
The
P roduction
Equipment: Equipment
B ISHOP
1 986:
R esearch
military
of
S eminar
D istribution the
in
a nd
M .C.
t he
B ishop
of Roman M ilitary
S econd
Roman
M ilitary
( BAR I nternational Series
B ishop,
within
' The
d istribution
2 75),
of
m ilitary
Roman forts of the f irst century A .D.'
Studien z u den Militärgrenzen Roms
I II.
internationalen
Aalen
1986),
f abrica
1-42
M .C.
equipment
and
P roceedings
( Oxford 1985),
' The
in the early principate'
Limeskongresses,
Vorträge 1 983,
d es
in 1 3.
( Stuttgart
7 17-23
B ISHOP f orthcoming: army in the
M .C.
Bishop,
f irst century
' Cavalry equipment of the Roman
A . D.',
i n
Proceedings
of
the
Fourth Roman Military Equipment Conference B ISHOP
&
THOMAS
1 984:
expert system Computer
BLAKE 1 985: 7 :10,
t he
BBC in
Hod Hill
m icro'
Blake,
1 962:
J .W .
' Ways
of
M .
" BEAKER" - an
in
Laflin
S .
( ed.),
1 984:
Conference
P ractical
C omputing,
5 6-62
s eeing',
1 27 Brailsford,
Hod H ill
in t he Durden Collection,
1 982:
Thomas,
Archaeology
( Birmingham 1984),
October 1984,
BRAILSFORD
BROUWER
A .
Bishop & J .
Applications
P roceedings,
f or
M .C.
Brouwer,
' Römische
1 34
1 :
Antiquities
f rom
( London 1962) P halerae
und
anderer
Lederbeschlag
a us
d em
R hein ',
Oudheidkundige Mededelingen
u it het R ijksmuseum van oudheden t e Leiden 6 3,
1 982,
B ULMER
1 980:
M .
B ulmer,
6 2,
west ',
1 979
r eeks),
' An introduction to Roman s amian ware
with special r eference to collections n orth
( nieuwe
1 45-87
( 1980),
CAMPBELL 1 975:
i n
Chester
and
t he
Journal of the C hester Archaeological S ociety , 5 -72
J .B. Campbell,
Journal of R oman S tudies,
' Who were the 65 ,
1 975,
" viri
m ilitares"?',
1 1-31
CAMPBELL 1 984: J .B. Campbell, The Emperor and the R oman Army 3 1 B .C. - A .D.235, ( Oxford 1 984) C LARKE 1 978:
D .L.
C larke,
by Bob Chapman , D ENSEM
1 976:
R .
P rojectiles
D ensem ,
f rom
d issertation , London), D E WEERD
Analytical Archaeology ,
R oman
B ritain
I nstitute
of
S pearheads
and
undergraduate
Archaeology,
1 977:
M .D.
D e
t he
University
o f
Weerd,
' The
d ate
of
Valkenburg
I
r eduction of a multiple choice question '
van B eek,
R .W .
( eds.),
Ex Horreo
( Cingula IV),
Brandt,
HODSON 1 975: J .E.
D OWN & RULE 1 971: A .
& W .
Groenman-van
( Amsterdam 1977),
Doran & F .R.
C omputers in Archaeology,
Vol.1,
M ilitary ( unpublished
in B .L.
&
r evised
( 1976)
r econsidered:
D ORAN
e d.2
( London 1978)
D own
Hodson ,
Waateringe 2 55-89
Mathematics and
( Cambridge 1975)
&
M .
R ule,
Chichester
E xcavations
( Oxford 1 971)
E TTLINGER
&
HARTMANN
' Fragmente e iner G egenstücke
1 984:
E .
v om
Grossen
G esellschaft P ro Vindonissa, F ELLMANN 1 954: Jahre
R .
F ellmann ,
1 953',
1 953/54 , F EUGERE 1983:
a us
&
S t.Bernhard', 1 984,
Hartmann , u nd
i hre
Jahresbericht
5 -46
' Die Grabungen
Jahresbericht
M .
Vindonissa
i m
Gesellschaft
L egionslager P ro
im
V indonissa,
5 -60 M .
D epartement r omanisation l a Loire,
E ttlinger
S chwertscheide
3 ,
F ILTZINGER 1 983:
F eugere, d e
l a
e n
pays
1 983, P .
e ' Llequipement militaire romain dans l l a Loire. C ontribution ä l 'etude d e
s egusiave ', Cahiers archeologiques de
45-66
F iltzinger,
L imesMuseum
1 983) 1 35
Aalen ,
( Stuttgart
F ITZPATRICK
1 986:
A .
F itzpatrick,
' Camulodunum and the early
occupation of south-east England.
Some reconsiderations'
Studien
Roms
zu
den
internationalen 1986), FORRER
Militärgrenzen Limeskongresses,
1 927:
1983,
i n 1 3.
( Stuttgart
R .
Forrer,
Das römische S traßburg,
Argentorate,
2
( Strasbourg 1927)
FRERE & ST.JOSEPH 1974:
S .S.
Frere & J .K.
f ortress at Longthorpe', GLASBERGEN
&
Britannia,
GROENMAN-VAN
Groenman-van Valkenburg
Waateringe, Z .H.
1974,
The
' The
R oman
1 -129
W .
Glasbergen & W .
P re-Flavian
Garrisons
of
( Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse
C ingula I I), 1 983:
St.Joseph,
5 ,
WAATERINGE 1 974:
Akademie van Wetenschappen ,
GREENE
Aalen
Vorträge d es
3 5-41
vols.,
85.
I II.
afd.
Letterkunde,
n ieuwe
r eeks
( Amsterdam-London 1974)
K .
Greene,
Archaeology:
M .
Hartmann,
An I ntroduction,
( London
1983) HARTMANN 1986:
HAWKES & HULL 1947: F irst
Report
( Reports
C .F.C. on
of
&
EVANS
Hawkes
the
the
1 972:
HOBLEY 1973:
B .
s ite,
No.XIV),
J .N.
Hobley ,
Hill
of
Society,
JENKINS
1 912:
V .
c arstva', N .S.
1 985:
JOHNS
LAWSON
at Colchester 1 930-1939 of
t he
S ociety
of
&
R .K.
in D .L.
Evans,
' A model
for
C larke
( ed.),
Models
in
B irmingham 85,
1971-3
Hoffiller, V jesnik 1 912,
I .
S econd
interim and
( 1973),
m ilitary r eport',
Warwickshire
7 -92
' Oprema r imskoga vojnika u prvo
Hrvatskoga
Arheoloskoga
D rustva
1 6-123
Jenkins,
' A
f rom Xanten
g roup
of
s ilvered-bronze
( Castra Vetera)',
Britannia,
16,
1 41-64
1982:
Rome,
the
1 2,
horse-trappings 1985,
Camulodunum.
( Oxford 1947)
1 968-71.
Transactions
( Zagreb),
Hull,
' Excavations at the Lunt Roman
Archaeological
doba
M .R.
( London 1972)
Baginton ,
HOFFILLER
&
C ommittee
classification and typology' Archaeology,
( Windisch 1986)
Excavations
R esearch
Antiquaries of London, H ILL
Vindonissa,
C .
Johns,
S ex or Symbol.
Erotic
Images of Greece and
( London 1982) 1 978:
A . K.
Lawson, 1 36
' Studien
z um
r ömischen
P ferdegeschirr',
Jahrbuch
Z entralmuseums Mainz, LYSONS 1 817: ( 1817) N IBLETT,
S .
2 5,
Lysons,
1 985:
R .
1978,
( CBA
Römisch-Germanischen
1 31-72
R eliquiae
N iblett,
S ite at Camulodunum
des
B ritannico-Romanae,
S heepen:
Vol.2,
an Early Roman I ndustrial
R esearch
R eport
No.57),
( London
1985) N ISSEN et
a l.
1 902:
Strack, -- k
J .
rheinischen 1 887-1900 1 11/2,
R E:
G .
N issen ,
Hagen ,
W issowa
( ed.),
I .A .
B etween
Museum ,
Lehner,
M .L.
Auftrag
d es
Bonner
Jahrbücher,
P aulys
( london 1980)
R ealencyclopädie der classischen
( Stuttgart 1 893-) Hod Hill
2 :
Excavations
Carried
and 1 958 f or the Trustees of the British
( London 1968)
Hofheim
E .
i .T.
Vereins
R itterling,
f ur
Römische Limes 1 975:
' Das
Ausgrabungs-
u nd
f rührömische F undbericht ',
nassauische
Geschichtsforschung,
ROBINSON
L egionslager',
Richmond,
1 951
R ITTERLING 1913:
PLO:
im
Mathematics in Archaeology,
Altertumswissenschaft,
Out
D as
H .
1 -462
Orton ,
R ICHMOND 1 968:
Koenen ,
' Novaesium.
ausgegrabene
C .
C .
P rovinzialverbandes vom Bonner Provinzialmuseum
1904 ,
ORTON 1980:
H .
40,
1913,
Lager
bei
Annalen
des
Altertumskunde
und
1 -416
in O sterreich
H .R .
R obinson,
The
Armour
of
Imperial Rome,
( London 1975) ROSS 1967:
A .
Ross,
and Tradition, S CHÖNBERGER
1 969:
Germany:
H .
an
S tudies,
5 9,
S CHÖNBERGER
S chönberger,
S tudies
' The
archaeological 1 969,
1 978:
Grabungen
P agan C eltic B ritain.
in I conography
( London 1967)
H .
von
R oman
s urvey',
f rontier
Journal
of
i n Roman
1 44-97 S chönberger,
1 968 bis
1 971
Kastell
Oberstinu i t:
( Limesforschungen 18),
d ie
( Berlin
1978) S COTT 1980:
I . R.
W . H.
Hanson
1979.
P apers
Roman
S cott,
' Spearheads of
& L .J.F.
Keppie
P resented to the
Frontier
Studies
( BAR 1 37
t he
( eds.),
British
l imes'
i n
Roman F rontier S tudies
1 2th International Congress of I nternational
S eries
7 1),
( Oxford 1 980) S MITH
1 976:
J .W .
S mith,
Foundations
o f
Archaeology ,
Todd ,
' Dating the Roman Empire:
( London
1 976) TODD 1 982: of
M .
a rchaeolo g y '
in B .
Orme
i n Archaeological D ating ( Exeter 1 982), TODD
1 985:
M .
( ed.),
( Exeter S tudies in Archaeology
T odd
( with
a
c ontribution by C .F.C.
O xford Journal of Archaeology , 1 959:
G .
und Burghöfe ULBERT 1 969a: 1 969, ULBERT
U lbert,
1 ),
o f
1 985,
r ecent
Hawkes),
e vidence',
1 87-99
D ie römischen D onaukastelle A islingen
Ulbert,
' Gladii
( Berlin 1959)
a us
P ompejil,
G ermania,
4 7,
9 7-128
1 969b:
G .
Ulbert,
D as
( Limesforschungen 9 ), ULBERT 1 970: T eil
4 ,
( Limesforsdhungen 1 ),
G .
c ontribution
3 5-56
' Oppida and the Roman army. A r eview
ULBERT
t he
P roblems a nd C ase S tudies
1 :
G .
Ulbert,
f rührömische Kastell R heingönheim
( Berlin 1969)
D as
römische
d ie Funde aus Metall,
D onau-Kastell
R iatissen,
Horn u nd Knochen ( Urkunden z ur
Vor- und Frühgeschichte aus SüdwürttembergHohenzollern Heft 4 ), UNZ
( Stuttgart 1970)
1 971:
C .
Unz,
Helveticae', 1 971, UNZ
' Römische
M ilitärfunde
Jahresbericht
Gesellschaft
P ro
V indonissa,
4 1-58
1 973:
C .
e hemaligen
Unz,
' Rö m ische
Kantonalen
M ilitärfunde
Antiquarium
G esellschaft P ro V indonissa, WACHER
a us Baden - Aquae
&
MCWHIRR 1 982:
E xcavations
1 :
1973,
• Roman
W indisch
im
Jahresbericht
1 1-42
J .S. Wacher & A .D.
E arly
a us
Aarau',
McWhirr,
O ccupation
a t
C irencester C irencester,
( Cirencester 1 982) WEBSTER
1 960:
G .
W ebster ,
O storius S capula',
' The
R oman m ilitary advance under
Archaeological Journal,
1 05,
1 958
( 1960),
4 9-98 WELLS 1 972:
C . M.
W ells,
The
G erman
P olicy
E xamination of t he Archaeological Evidence, W ILD
1 981: Carpow ',
J .P.
W ild ,
B ritannia,
' A 1 2,
f ind 1981,
1 38
of 3 05-6 '
R oman
of
Augustus.
An
( Oxford 1 972) — s cale armour f rom
ZADOKS-,JOSEPHUS JITTA & Jitta
&
A . M.
Netherlands',
WITTEVEEN
W itteveen ,
1 977:
' Roman
Oudheidkundige
A . N.
bronze
Z adoks-Josephus l unulae f rom the
Mededelingen
R ijksmuseum van oudheden t e Leiden,
1 39
5 8,
1977,
u it 167-95
het
R OMAN M ILITARY E QUIPMENT ON THIRD CENTURY TOMBSTONES J .C.
British have
s tudents
Coulston
of Roman s culpture and of the Roman Army
l argely ignored third century
t ombstones.
d epictions
This i s partly because
1
t he genre occur
in
B ritain
and
o f
s oldiers
on
f ew spectacular examples of
attention
has
understandably
concentrated on the r icher f irst century f igures.
I n contrast to
these the third century stones almost all depict the deceased in ' undress',
often
equipment. t he
with
the
absolute
m inimum
Very f ew e xamples occur in the
region
where
t he
o f
m ilitary
Rhineland,
precisely
f irst century stones are most numerous.
German scholars have been more attentive because of the numerous t hird century small-finds which
may
in
s ome
f rom Upper Rhenish and
c ategories
r eference to the sculpture. numerous
i n
the
D anubian
be
The third century r egion
R aetian
where
s tones
G erman
However,
it i s important to draw
depictions
attention
t o
t he
third
a s an Empire-wide phenomenon and to outline
t he distribution and the relation of archaeological many
most
2
t he important characteristics of the equipment shown. r aises
a re
and Austrian
s culptural studies have unavoidably dealt with them .
c entury
f orts
functionally explained with
important
A study of small-finds
questions concerning the development of
Roman arms and armour in the third century.
CHARACTERISTICS AND DATING The
f amiliar f irst to second century tombstones have one or
more of the t unic
f ollowing
( very
t hree-quarter with'apron';
depictional
occasionally l ength
with
l ong,
s leeves);
one
s cutum;
s ometimes
hasta(e)
f or
AD
d epicting
a
r ectangular,
a uxiliaries,
pila
i s
l egionary
i nvariably s tones
barb-headed type or
( Figs.1-3).
are The
t he paenula a re
on
hexagonal
f or
end
or
l egionaries; 3
o f
t he
s econd
( Figs.1-4).
The
6
and
The
t he
1 41
4
The
by hastae
o r
s horter ,
shields are of the earlier,
proportionally
most characteristic
t ombstones.
P ita do appear 5 but on most
r eplaced
( Fig.1).
broader
a g ladius or
t roops on the Marcus Column in Rome
l ong-sleeved.
t hey
weapons
the
or baggy
plated c ingula
a very d ifferent panoply
and completely replaces
oval
two
a helmet and a l orica hamata or squamata.
s agum is a lready worn by a ll t unic
s hort-sleeved
t ight s leeves, or
A new f ormula appears perhaps at c entury
a
an infantry paenula or cavalry s agum;
c avalry spatha on the dexter hip; oval
e lements:
s quatter
ovals
f eatures are the belts and
P 1.1
P 1.2
1 42
their may
f ittings.
The s ingle c ingulum i s of
be very wide and an almost ubiquitous
t o f asten it at the f ront. f astening, f rom the
' ring-buckle'
belt
and
t o
a ttaching
the
two
d eceased
them
o ften
( Fig.4).
the
a
on
The
sword,
pelta-forml°
ivy-leaf
t erminals
Sometimes both ends of the
8
e ffect.
of g ladius
a
or,
baldric
By
9
i tself
m ore
or spatha
on
the
u sually,
attached
t o
the
a roundel over the
hang o f
or
a lmost
u sually
Chapes
baldric 1 2
the
are
( Figs.2,
s cabbard
i s
The baldric i s very on
t he
c hest
scabbard and a large ivy-leaf terminal ( Fig.4).
1 3
Body
n ever appears though an occasional helmet may be
( Fig.3). The
F lavius
f irst datable depiction of this panoply i s Felix)
s acrificing
l ong-sleeved tunic, d ating
s agum
names
and
on
and
shows
an
a ltar.
r ing-buckle.
with
by
imperial
' Philippiana',
He
1 4
( T.
wears
more
etc.)
including
t itles
' M.
( e.g.
Aurelius'.
' Severiana
a
g eneral
g ive a dating bracket.
Some stones,
by supposed historical context.
1 5
c entury
i nclude reliefs
t he ship relief f rom Palmyra, Dura-Europos
and
t he
t he Sassanid
v ictory 1 6
c haracteristic
f ittings
f rom Albano
of
t ombstone
c ross-bow
o f
( legio I I
S hapur
f rom
brooch
T etrardhic
an
unknown
I
a t
Aquileia
( although others
possibly indicative of a
Tombstone
d ated
s ecurely dated to the P arthica),
f resco
f rom
s eries of Roman soldiers and emperors in
Naqsh-i-Rustam.
prominent
such as
may be
the tribune Terentius
r eliefs
A
Examples
R egimental
A lexandriana',
( dated to AD231-33)
a
officer
For
t he example f rom Apamea Syriae t hird
from E ining,
a n
of these stones names of deceased soldiers often provide
a t erminus post quem
P 1.1
the
t ype
f lat and round
belt by a s lide.
placed by a consular date in AD211,
has
When
i s
hip.
on the end hanging down alongside the scabbard s een
t his
sometimes having applied decorative plates
a rmour
7
and belt
l ength,
s inister
large,
When not obscured by cloak
a rea,
a long
sufficient to identify the deceased as a soldier.
s uspended f rom
w ide,
back
then allowed to hang down.
have
r ing
e ither s ide to fungiform
r ing and are tucked back up behind the c ingulum
double-crescent
r ing-buckle i s
often
i s used
may be s een on many reliefs idly holding this strap in
f rom
g iving
d exter hip,
ends
his dexter hand down
but
A number of methods are indicated for
Alternatively the dexter strap-end i s passed
s plit the
1 1
breadth
such as s imply passing the two ends through the
behind
s tuds.
4 ).
varying
B ishapur
f rom the town
and
and
has none of the do)
but
a ' Pannonian bonnet',
period
s oldier
o r
l ater
f ound
i n
d ate.
1 7
I stanbul
Archaeological Museum . P 1.2
Tombstone D ivitensium.
o f
Aprilius
Spidatus
f rom
I stanbul Archaeological Museum.
1 43
a n umerus
P l. 3
P 1.4
1 44
L ikewise
the
r ing-buckles, t he
D iocletianic Luxor f rescoes do not perhaps depict possibly g iving a general terminus ante
' ring-buckle' A
vast
prove
to
f or
majority of the stones with surviving inscriptions
have
praetoriani.
been
The
s et
up
a uxiliary
by
and/or
exceptions
plain miles a lthough auxiliary milites I ntercisa
quem
panoply. 1 8
and
Brigetio
in
f or l egionarii
and
often have ranks above do
particular.
occur The
1 9
at
Aquincum ,
f irst and third
s ites were l egionary fortresses where auxiliary burial practices were most l ikely influenced by l egionary was
e xceptional
s trong l egionary connections. t he
' horseman' 2 1
2°
Very f ew
type of relief,
s cattered s ingle occurences, R ome.
s tones
and
I ntercisa
f or the wealth of the Syrian community and its e xamples
f all
w ithin
the exceptions being confined to
or to equites s ingulares Augusti in
The majority of third century stones depict
or half-figure standing soldiers,
f ull-figure
sometimes with their families,
though occasionally horses appear in the background or being l ed by
the
deceased
o r
his c ab .
C omparative
pay
l evels
presumably a factor governing the presence of f igures a s
i n
earlier
periods,
hence
t he
praetorian
were
on s telai
and l egionary
predominance.
D ISTRIBUTION The sculptural monuments of third
c entury equipment studies.
heavily stylised in the s oldier-prisoner
panels
on
Arch
pedestal
of
product of s arcophagus with
of
u seless
r eliefs.
The
f or
C onstantinian
s culptors and the style i s not
t he capital puts even greater
Examples
quite
Constantine are for the most part the
s mall details o f belt or s cabbard
t ombstone f igures,
are
l arge panels and hopelessly conservative
i n t he
t he
R ome
The arches of Severus are very
emphasis
f ittings. on
t he
e specially praetorian examples
concerned
This hiatus in third
c entury
f rom the c ity.
f irst to second century tombstone reliefs are
c oncentrated along the Rhine and in Britain with a f ew Upper and M iddle Danubian examples. v irtually
a bsent
w ith
I n
t he
E astern
P rovinces
j ust a f ew instances
in Greece.
more occur in the West African provinces though due in outside vexillationes.
P 1.3
Tombstone
o f
t hey 2 2
a re
Rather
p art
t o
2 3
Aurelius Surus f rom the
l egio I Adiutrix.
I stanbul Archaeological Museum.
P 1.4
Tombstone of an unknown soldier'found Herakleia Pontica.
at
t he
s ite
I stanbul Archaeological Museum .
1 45
o f
The
third
century
d istribution
pattern.
e rection
f igural
of
r eliefs Something
2 4
t ombstones
m iddle Danubian r egion in t he AD and i t i s produced periods.
l ikely
there This
t hat
was may
f orm of
the
a
r ather
d ifferent
r enaissance
i n
t he
s eems to have occurred in the
late s econd to early third c entury actual
proportionally be
a
a
d irect
v olume g reater
f unction
o f
s uch
t han
i n
of
t he
p ieces e arlier
political,
s trategic and economic importance of the I llyrian armies and the r enewed practice spread eastwards and westwards There
may
f rom the region .
be of course be a survival e lement involved,
a t Brigetio and Intercisa where very large bodies and inscriptions are present. o verall
p icture
unduly.
However,
T he
of
notably
s culpture
t his need not distort the
spread
o f
t ombstone
t ypes and
d ecorative motifs f rom the Danube direct to Rome i s indisputable ( for example the use of the on equites
' Danubian R ider God'
s ingulares Augusti tombstones)
type hunt scene
and must be
a
d irect
r esult of the Severan reform of the Imperial Guard units and the c onsequent
shifts
i n
t he Danubian revival t radition
in
e xamples,
t he
r ecruitment patterns. of
f igured
Greek
East
geographical
t ombstones but
or
Speidel attributed
there
t emporal,
t o are
to
a
c ontinuous
no
' bridging'
s upport
this
s upposition. 2 5 The
c oncentration
of
t ombstone
o ccurrences
principally
r eflects the distribution of a particular f unerary practice.
The
v irtual absence of third century f igures on the
the
Lower
D anube
types
do
work has been carried out.
r ecord
t hem
comparable
provinces.
in
r egions
with
D ura-Europos
t he
Africa.
t hese
it i s not
t he absence
of
so significant as much a s the
l argely devoid of a small-finds
, British ,
apart,
s mall-finds occur in Greece, North
former where much small-find
However,
2 6
t ombstone representations which i s of
a nd
not of course reflect an absence of equipment
e specially in the case of the
presence
R hine
R henish
and
e xtraordinarily
Asia M inor,
D anubian
f ew
S yria ,
r elevant
P alestine
and
Third century tombstones in contrast occur in all
r egions 27
contributing
something
t o
contemporary
d iscussion of equipment uniformity and r egional currency.
ARCHAEOLOGICAL F INDS The
equipment
depicted
on
t he
t hird
c entury stones
i s
well-supported archaeologically and a combination of reliefs and small-finds s cabbards bone
has i n
a llowed
r econstruction
particular.
f inds are associated with
r ing-buckles
of
t he
belts
c lasses of i ron ,
t he c ingulum
and
and
bronze and
baldric.
T he
occur either a s plain r ings or as more complex and
d ecorated adjustable types, and
S everal
I ntercisa.
2 8
notably
a t
N iederbieber,
At Intercisa grave-finds
f unction and position on the
body.
1 46
2 9
S aalburg
i n s itu suggested the
Numerous
f ungiform
s tud
f inds may include those used on the c ingulum. Surviving and Vimose s culptural ( Fig.4).
Vimose,
r ibbons
Saalburg,
and
Carlisle,
openwork f rom
plates.
This
and
Bronze
s cabbard-slides the
m id
were
s econd
third
century
S hields, D anish
and
London, bog
bone
Mainz,
de p osits.
and
d id
the
positioning
AD
i n
I ron s lides were i vory
examples
Novae,
u se
f rom
but only appear in u sed
i n
o ccur
Khisfine
the
a t South
and
i n
the
The important point demonstrated by the
3 2
not always pass through the
( Figs.1,
3 ).
The
l ong s lide opening but
i s often depicted as overlaying the sword with the phalera t he
obscured
of
are c learly
3 1
r eliefs i s that the s lide was worn outermost baldric
hinged f or
The Vimose baldrics
apparently
Intercisa,
R ochester
with
positioning
c entury
d epictions of the third century.
H igh
baldric
the phalera
f igural and
attachments
s tandard cross-bars. the
r oundels
a s roundels with
plates
a s
with
' phalera'
p lain
Zugmantel,
c orroborated by the B ishapur reliefs.
approximately
well
c omplex
r ectangular
had punched decoration indicating t hese
a s
a s
were in the past identified hanging
f rom Thorsbjerg
correspond
Zugmantel etc.),
S imris)
( Vimose,
S imilar
' tongues'
l ong)
and the appearance of a bronze
( Vimose,
l ettered openwork 3°
l eather baldrics
1 18.5cm
latter appear archaeologically
reliefs
e tc.).
century
d epictions
The
( Thorsbjerg, i nset
t hird
( c.7-8cm wide,
s lide area
( Fig.4).
over
Oldenstein has explained this
method of attaching the non-plated end of the
baldric
d irectly
a round the s cabbard with the end strip tied to an eye projecting f rom the back of the phalera. a longside
the
attachments were employed The
l arge,
and
by
and examples the
Thus the plated end hangs
C learly
a
Syrian
German
f inds
s o
3 5
many
( Mainz,
f rom Danish Nydam , H auran.
variety
o f
f reely
s cabbard
j udging from the reliefs.
c ircular chape s een on
well-represented e tc.)
3 3
s cabbard.
t ombstones
Köln ,
Dura-Europos,
P eltaform
d hapes
Khisfine
3 4
on the tombstone
r eliefs are attested archaeologically again f rom the mid c entury
AD. 3 6
Ulbert
except
perhaps
into a very l ong,
( length: width
proportion
f rom
3 7
S ome of the
Künzing,
narrow
1 5-17:1)
however,
s uggested by Vegetius'
d ating
belt
brackets
the
B ishapur
together
a nd by
R hine-Raetian l imes
s emispatha sword
l ong.
t ombstone
s hort
( Fig.4).
L auriacum
metre
with a
f ittings
sword
type type F inds
r eliefs a s
l ater
3 8
a re mostly g iven general
the
occupational
s ites
a ssociated
147
a
r ock
f rom Danish
S traubing/Nydam
and
former are a lmost a
d emonstrate continuity in the use of
These
on
c lassified third century spathae
and l imes sites ( 8-12:1).
s econd
Bone box-chapes occur in Britain and Germany but do
not occur on sculpture r elief s .
i s
Niederbieber
periods with
known
of
Upper
barbarian
i ncursions and abandonments. d eposit
i s
the
Lyon
A useful s ecurely dated
3 9
g rave
with
coins
a ssociated with the Battle of Lugdunum produced
a spatha,
phalera.
of
i n
f unerary
AD194,
AD197.
4°
plausibly The
g rave
a bronze scabbard s lide and a bronze baldric
Two identical bronze strap-ends may represent the split
ends of a wide c ingulum. According to sculptural representations oval i n
u se
by
the praetoriani
l egionarii at l east f rom the t hroughout
in the late
f irst
t he imperial period. 41
c entury stones were another
s hields
were
f irst century AD and by some c entury
The oval
evolutionary
and
probably
shields on the third s tage
i n
t he s cutum
d evelopment and may be identified with t he Dura oval examples. The
g reat hiatus
in
t he
between the Niedermörmter bronze R obinson
t o
the
e arly
c entury Intercisa t ombstone
l egionary
third century AD ,
helmets 43
is
representations
only
example,
protection
i nadequately
( Fig.3).
l eaving a ' T'
of a projecting neck-flange c ertainty
and
i s
s culptural
T hese
present
by
f illed
d epict with
c annot
by
s omething
a
shaped f ace opening.
evidence
d ated
and the early fourth
s imilar to the third century cavalry helmets c heek
4 2
s eries of surviving infantry helmets
one-piece HOW much
44
be
s aid
with
f or helmet types
i s anyway
contained pilum-heads
possibly
notoriously unreliable. The Caerleon weapon d ating
t o
hoard
t he third century AD. 45
Few p ila occur on tombstones
a lthough Vegetius s uggests the continued use of weapons.
T he stelai
f avour of
s horter,
l ighter
precursors of Vegetius' The
which are as yet s o.
t hrowing
spears
which
Late Roman types.
may
r epresent
the cultural and
f ar from clear.
t actical
i mplications
Without a fuller archaeological
r esponsible for the process of change, origin.
in of
f or the Danubian region at l east they threaten to remain
The S armatian and Parthian interaction spheres may
s lides
t he
4 6
t hird century representations i mply certain changes
m ilitary equipment, r ecord
heavy
imply l egionary abandonment of the p ilum in
are concerned, O n
the
p edestal
has
be
e specially where s cabbard
these being essentially of Central Asiatic of
Trajan's Column s lides appear on
cene C the D aco-Sarmatian scabbards and in S horse-holder
b oth
one
on
his
scabbard.
s inister
A gradual
barbarian
influence of
oman usage seems barbarian equipment on Danubian region R
l ikely,
e specially in the equestrian sphere
o f
draco,
contus
e tc.).
( compare
t he
u se
t he scabbard s lide as a result of nomadic contacts or A siatic origins. R oman
47
' four-ring'
s econd century AD. s hown,
t he
48
o f
t heir
I n Palmyrene sculpture the characteristically suspension method i s depicted until the Thereafter s cabbard
‚ slides
e arliest dated example being the
r elief of AD191.
t he
Trousdale suggests that the Parthians used
That
t hese
c hanges
1 48
were
a re
l ater
e xclusively
B eth Phaseil g enii having
i mportant
e ffects
outside the Roman Empire i s
clearly demonstrated by the
e xtraordinary f inds f rom Free Germany, D enmark.
particularly
systems and Roman modifications to combat them i s at
present.
However,
r epresentations and points
t hose
f rom
What this meant in terms of changing barbarian weapons
t o
a
the
the
uniformity
small-find
o f
types
a lso t he
obscure
s culptural
a cross
t he
Empire
uniformity of equipment which cannot be explained
away solely by t roop movements. The point made above that a i dentify
t he
r ing-buckle
a
f igure
t o
i mportance.
In the f irst to second century AD the Roman
was d istinguishable f rom his
hobnailed boots,
sword if carried). 49
s imilar
d istinguish soldiers, f eature.
5°
One
when he was in
c entury
m ilitary caligae tunic
' civilian '
only go
' made'
t o
and,
have
the c ingulum a s
office,
t o
d isfavour.
5 2
he
unless
f ar
no
l onger
by
( and wore
been
e ssentially
c olour was used to
was
a
d istinguishing
a s to s ay that visually the
the soldier.
When S everus cashiered the
praetorians their belts were confiscated. Im ilitarisation '
soldier
' undress'
and the sagum had replaced
s eem
dress
m ight
c ingulum militare
i s
a s a soldier i s of some
his paenula and his c ingulum militare
Sagum and
t o
' civilians'
By the third
c haracteristically the paenula.
deceased
on
s ufficient
5 1
With the Late
Roman
of the c ivil service belts became the badges of
be
conferred
or
c onfiscated
with
f avour
or
NOTES 1 .
This paper i s a preliminary note to a detailed survey of 3rd century f igured military tombstones.
2 .
For example,
HOFMANN ,
3 .
Many l st-2nd
c entury
' undress', a ll the any
i .e.
1 969.
t ombstones
without
d epict
t he
deceased
body armour and helmet.
in
Virtually
3 rd century stones do l ikewise so cannot be used Robinson 's
observation
o f
( 1975,
4 .
W ILSON ,
5 .
DURRY,
in
conclusions were based
t he
Arch
on
an
i ncorrect
of Severus in the Forum Romanum,
1 71).
1929. 1938,
examples. C ivico , Mus.
UBL,
d iscussion of a supposed decline in the use of infantry
armour. Rome
1905;
pl.X.B and CUMONT,
Another pilum
1942,
appears
on
pl.XX.1
for
two
Rome
a relief in the Museo
Bologna.
Aquileia,
1 972,
nos
348-9,
( Istanbul).
1 49
3 51;
S PEIDEL,
1 976,
f ig.3
7 .
8 .
BARK6CZI e t
a l.,
OLDENSTEIN ,
1 976,
HOFMANN ,
1 905,
no.5507
C .S.I.R.,
9 .
F or example,
1 0.
MENDEL ,
1 1.
3 2.A-C;
( Salona);
MENDEL ,
UBL ,
1 969,
f ig.169;
1 942,
n o.36
t sperandieu,
1 914,
D eutschland,
CUMONT ,
1 914,
no.47
f ig.19,
f ig.51
( Straßburg);
Pontica);
1 ,2,
1 954 ,
f ig.2,8.
n os
I ,1,
pl.XX.1
1 907-66 ,
8 91-2
no.31
( Heracleia
( Augsburg).
( Rome).
( Istanbul);
C .S.I.R.,
G reat
B ritain,
( Bath).
I nterestingly none of the British stones depict round chapes which
c oincidentally
do
not
o ccur
i n
t he
p rovince's
archaeological record. 1 2.
For example,
1 3.
HOFMANN ,
SPEIDEL ,
1 905,
f ig.56
( Heracleia Pontica); 1 4.
C .S.I.R .,
1 5.
BALTY ,
1 6.
TENTORICI, 1 926,
1 981,
2 00,
Aquileia,
MONNERET DE V ILLARD ,
For
e xample,
p l.XII.2; 2 0.
F ITZ,
2 1.
For
1 978,
2 3.
Collected by
1 914,
no.891
( Perinthus).
no.477.
C OLLEDGE , 1962,
1 976,
p1.197,
p1.103;
2 02,
CUMONT ,
2 04.
1 953,
p l.XXX-II;.
KALAVREZOU-MAXEINER ,
1 905, 1 954,
f ig.58;
BARK6CZI,
1 951,
pl.XLI.5.
1 65.
S PEIDEL , p 1.1
STUART JONES ,
KOS,
f ig.4
no.354.
HOFMANN ,
1 978,
2 2.
MENDEL ,
1976 ,
7 -14.
1 10-2,
e xample,
( Rome);
1972,
BARK6CZI e t a l.,
1972,
S PEIDEL ,
I ,1,
GHIRSHMAN ,
1 8.
pl.I-II,
( Aquicum );
f ig.313;
M us.
1 975,
( Istanbul).
f ig.221.
1 975,
pl.XLIX-L;
f ig.2-3
SPEIDEL,
D eutschland,
1 7.
1 9.
1 976,
1 975,
p 1.2
( Lambaesis); 1 912,
p1.82,
8 4
P alestine);
( Nablus, AMELUNG,
1 903,
p 1.28
( Rome).
p1.1. BENSEDDIK,
1 979 ,
b ut
o mitting
3 rd
c entury
e xamples. 2 4.
For
a
ee COULSTON , brief summary of occurrences s
f or Britain s ee COULSTON & PHILLIPS,
1 50
f orthcoming,
1 983, no.193.
and A
v ery u seful catalogue has now been provided by NOELKE, 2 5.
SPEIDEL , i n
1976,
f act
1 986.
1 35 c ites Black Sea s telai a s influential but
t hey
had
l ittle
o r
n o
m ilitarily most c losely connected,
e ffect
on
namely the
t hose areas Lower
D anube
and northern Asia M inor. 2 6.
T he
p rimary work on the small-finds, heavily r elied upon in
t his paper , 2 7.
2 8.
i s OLDENSTEIN ,
I n addition to t hose mentioned here and in Mus.
L uxor,
1 978,
p 1.2
1 981,
no.296;
BARK6CZI et a l.,
2 9.
BARK6CZI et a l.,
3 0.
STERNQUIST , 1 985;
1954,
3 2.
3 3.
( Auzia);
1 983:
S PEIDEL,
1 954 ,
3 ;
ALFÖLDI e t —
2 18-9.
8 7,
f ig.23,
OLDENSTEIN ,
a l., —
1 957,
9 7-9 .
1976 ,
2 26-34;
ALLASON,JONES ,
1 954;
OLDENSTEIN ,
1 976,
2 23-6,
f ig.10;
1962, p1.197.
BARK6CZI et
a l.,
2 36-7;
OLDENSTEIN ,
3 4. HUNDT,
C OULSTON ,
1 912
1 986.
STERNQUIST ,
2 20-9 ,
pl.XXV .1,
1 976 ,
1 954;
i dem ,
GHIRSHMAN ,
REINACH ,
( Tipasa).
4 56-61; OLDENSTEIN ,
3 1.
1 976.
1 954 ,
1976 ,
1 953;
p l.XIV .1-2,
OLDENSTEIN , 2 28-9,
1 955;
1 976 ,
XX.3;
9 5-109;
TROUSDALE,
CHAPMAN ,
1975,
1976.
f ig.11-2.
OLDENSTEIN ,
1 976 ,
1 16;
pers.
comm . Mr
S .
James. 3 5.
TROUSDALE,
1975,
1 06-7,
p1.18-9;
1962,
p1.197.
pers.
obs. National Museum ,
Damascus. 3 6. GHIRSHMAN, 3 7.
ULBERT,
3 8.
I bid.,
3 9.
OLDENSTEIN ,
4 0.
ULBERT,
4 1.
4 2.
1 974, 2 10-11,
2 15-6. f ig.3;
1 976 ,
1 974,
Vegetius,
1 1,15.
5 9-66.
2 11-15, p 1.72
f ig.4;
STRONG ,
1 980,
pl.XXXVI
( Aquincum s tela).
ROSTOVTZEFF e t a l.,
OLDENSTEIN ,
1 976 ,
( Cancelleria r elief);
1939,
3 26-69, 1 51
pl.XLI-II,
88-9 .
S ZILAGYI,
XLIV-VI.
1 956,
4 3.
ROBINSON ,
1975,
4 4.
C .S.I. R.,
" a esterreich,
f ig.2
7 3;
( Istanbul),
45.
NASH-WILLIAMS,
46.
Vegetius,
4 7.
TROUSDALE,
THOMAS , I II,
1971, 2 ,
13-25.
no.86
( Enns);
S PEIDEL,
1 976,
5 ( Brigetio).
1 932,
f ig.20-21.
1 ,20. 1 975,
85-7.
For
the
question
of
o utside
influences on Roman equipment and tactical developments COULSTON,
1986.
48.
COLLEDGE,
1976,
4 9.
Cf.
Petronius,
5 0.
The
evidence
p1.44. S atyricon, f or
dubious value.
s ee
8 3.
t unic
c olours
i s d iffuse and mostly of
Reliable depictions of 3 rd
c entury
s oldiers
show white tunics with purple embroidered bands and orbiculi ( CUMONT , 1953,
1 926,
pl.XLIX-L,
pl.XXX-XXXIII,
Der-el-Medineh(?)
mummy
indistinguishable
f rom
century mosaics and 199,
2 07,
5 1.
Cf.
5 2.
JONES,
2 11,
Herodian, 1 964,
Zosimus,
Dura f resco;
Luxor f resco;
2 30,
Luxor,
portrait).
' civilian '
f rescoes
2 26-7,
MONNERET DE VILLARD,
Mus.
1981,
no.290,
These
are
dress depicted in 3 rd-4th
( BANDINELL1,
1 971,
p 1.86-7,
3 13).
1 1,13,10. 5 66;
L 'ORANGE,
Historia Nova,
1965,
1 11,19;
7 -8;
V ,46.
WIDENGREN ,
1968.
Cf.
•
B IBLIOGRAPHY ALFÖLDI
et a l.
Pöczy , Vägö,
A .
1957:
M .R.
Radnöti,
I ntercisa,
ALLASON-JONES
1 985:
Carlisle',
A .
Alföldi,
L .
Barköczi,
Salamon ,
K .
Sägi,
I I,
( Budapest 1957)
L .
Allason-Jones,
Transactions of the
Archaeological
and
Natural
J .
' An
J .
e agle
Cumberland History
F itz,
K .S.
Szilägyi and E .B.
and
Society,
mount f rom Westmorland LXXXV ,
1 985,
2 64-6 ALLASON-JONES 1986: Carlisle', AMELUNG
1 903:
Museums,
L .
Allason-Jones,
S aalburg-Jahrbuch, W .
Amelung,
D ie
( Berlin 1903) 1 52
42,
' An
1986 ,
S culpturen
e agle
mount
f rom
68-9 des
Vaticanischen
Mus.
Aquileia
1 972:
Muse°
delle S culture R omane, BALTY 1981:
J .C.
Balty,
BANDINELLI 1971:
R .B.
Arch4ologico
d i Aquileia:
C atalogo
( Rome 1 972)
Guide d 'Apamee,
Bandinelli,
( Brussels 1981)
Rome:
The Late Empire,
( London
1971) BARKOCZI
1951:
BARKOCZI
e t a l.
Fülep ,
L .
Barköczi,
1954:
L .
Brigetio,
Barköczi,
J7- Nemeskeri,
M .R.
G .
( Budapest 1951) Erdelyi,
Alföldi and K .
E .
Sägi,
F erenczy ,
F .
I ntercisa,
I ,
( Budapest 1954) BENSEDDIK 1979: romaine
N .
en
Benseddik,
Les troupes auxiliaires de l 'armee
Mauretanie
C esarienne
sous
l e
Haut-Empire,
( Algiers 1979) CHAPMAN 1976: London ', COLLEDGE
H .
Chapman ,
' Two
R oman
Antiquaries Journal,
1 976:
M .A . R.
LVI,
Colledge,
s cabbard
1976,
The
Art
s lides
f rom
2 50-3 of P almyra,
( London
1976) COULSTON 1983: f rom
J .C.
Coulston ,
Wallsend',
' A f ragmentary
Archaeologia
a ltar
Aeliana,
t o
s er.5,
Jupiter
XI,
1 983,
3 09-13 COULSTON 1986: tactical The
J .C.
Coulston ,
developments'
Defence
of
t he
International Series COULSTON
&
Corpus
Hadrian's
Wall
P .
Roman 297,
P HILLIPS
Phillips,
' Roman,
in
and
f orthcoming: Imperii
West
the
and
J .C.
( eds.),
East,
BAR
5 9-75 Coulston
Romani,
R iver
S assanid
Kennedy
Byzantine
( Oxford 1986),
S ignorum of
P arthian
Freeman & D .
and
Great
North
E .J.
Britain,
Tyne,
( Oxford
f orthcoming) CUMONT 1926:
F .
Cumont,
Fouilles de Doura E uropos,
CUMONT 1942:
F .
Cumont,
R echerches
des
Romains,
D URRY 1938: P
P
ESPERANDIEU
M .
( Paris
Durry , 1 907-66:
bas-reliefs,
s ur l e
( Paris
symbolisme
1926)
f uneraire
1 942)
Les
Cohortes E .
P retoriennes,
Esperandieu,
statues et bustes de
1907-6 0
1 53
Recueil
l a Gaule
( Paris
1938)
general romaine,
des ( Paris
F ITZ
1 972:
J .
Fitz,
GHIRSHMAN 1 962:
R .
Les
Syriennes A I ntercisa,
Ghirshman ,
I ran:
( Brussels 1972)
P arthians
and
S assanians,
( London 1 962) HOFMANN
1 905:
A .
Donauländer, HUNDT
1 953:
Hofmann ,
H .J.
Hundt,
Dosenortbänder', HUNDT
1 955:
Römische
' Die
H .J.
Hundt,
A . H. M.
1 2,
1953,
' Nachträge
der
e isernen
6 6-79
z u
den
r ömischen
Dosenortbändern
M iniaturschwertanhängern', 1 964:
s pätrömischen
S aalburg Jahrbuch,
R ingknaufsdhwerten ,
JONES
Militärgrabsteine
( Vienna 1905)
Jones,
S aalburg Jahrbuch,
The
Later
R oman
und 1 4,
1955,
Empire,
50-9
2 84-602,
( Oxford 1 964) KALAVREZOU-MAXEINER 1975: chamber at Luxor', KOS
1 978:
H .S.
Corinth', Mus.
Kos,
I .
Kalavrezou-Maxeiner,
Dumbarton Oaks
P apers,
' The
imperial
1975,
2 28-51
' A Latin epitaph of a Roman l egionary f rom
Journal of Roman Studies,
Luxor 1 981:
2 9,
6 8,
1978 ,
D as Museum f ür a ltägyptische
2 2-5
Kunst
in
Luxor,
( Mainz 1981) MENDEL
1 914:
R omaines
G . et
( Istanbul
Mendel,
Catalogue
Byzantines,
Mus es
U .
NASH-WILLIAMS
NOELKE
I mperieux
Grecques,
Ottomans,
Monneret de Villard,
t he imperial cult at Luxor',
1932,
s culptures
I II,
1 914)
MONNERET DE V ILLARD 1953:
f ortress
des
1 932: a t
V .E.
Archaeologia,
Nash-Williams,
Caerleon ,
I I',
9 5,
' The temple of 1953,
86-105
' The Roman l egionary
Archaeologia
Cambrensis,
8 7,
48-104
1 986:
P .
Noelke,
' Ein neuer Soldatengrabstein aus Köln'
in S tudien zu den Militärgrenzen Roms internationalen 1986), OLDENSTEIN
Limeskongresses,
I II.
Aalen
Vorträge d es
1 3.
1 983,
( Stuttgart
Ausrüstung
römischer
2 13-25 1 976:
J .
Auxiliareinheiten Kommission, L ' ORANGE 1965:
5 7, H .P.
O ldenstein , s,
Berichten
1976,
d er
römisch-germanischen
49-284
L ' Orange,
Late Roman Empire,
' Zur
Art Forms and C ivic
( Princeton 1965)
1 54
Life
i n
the
R EINACH
1 912:
Romain . _ s,
S .
I I,
ROBINSON 1975:
R einach,
( Paris H .R .
Rk pertoire
de
R eliefs
Grecs
et
1912)
Robinson ,
The
Armour
of
I mperial
Rome,
( London 1975) ROSTOVTZEFF e t Welles,
a l.
1 939:
M .I.
Rostovtzeff,
F .E.
The Excavations at Dura-Europos:
of the S eventh and Eighth S easons of Work, SPEIDEL
1 975:
M .P.
Speidel,
Roman imperial army', Welt,
1 1.3,
S PEIDEL 1976:
1975,
M .P.
Jahrbücher, S PEIDEL 1978:
M .P.
Aufstieg und Niedergang der
1976,
B .
' Eagle-bearer and trumpeter',
Guards of the Roman Armies:
Sternquist ,
B efestigungsöse', S TRONG 1 980:
D .
H .
Rome: S ZILÄGYI
The
THOMAS
J .
1 975:
1 971:
( ed.),
Aquincum ,
Tentorici,
E .B.
TROUSDALE 1 975:
UBL
1 969:
Thomas,
W .
C atalogue
of
the
Helme,
( Oxford 1 912)
( Budapest 1956)
S childe,
( Rome 1975) Dolche.
S tudien über
( Budapest 1971)
The Long Sword and S cabbard
H .
Ubl,
1 974:
Waffen und Uniform des
S lide
nach
den
römischen Heeres der
Grabreliefs
Noricums
und
( Vienna unpublished dissertation 1969) G .
U lbert,
' Straubing
Langschwerten der späten Limeszeit', ( eds.),
Archäologie. Geburtstag, W1DENGREN
5 9-68
( Washington 1975)
P annoniens,
Ulbert
A
Castra Albana,
Trousdale,
P rinzipatsepoche
ULBERT
1954 ,
( London 1980)
römische-pannonische Waffenkunde,
i n Asia,
1 3,
m it
Preserved in the Municipal Collections of
S zilägyi,
E .
An E ssay
B eschlagplatten
S culptures of the Museo C apitolino,
1956:
TENTORICI
Roman Art,
Stuart Jones
Ancient S culptures
Bonner
( Bonn 1978)
' Runde
S aalburg Jahrbuch,
Strong,
STUART JONES 1912:
römischen
1 25-63
Speidel,
1 954:
( New Haven 1 939)
' The rise of ethnic units in the
on the S ingulares of the P rovinces, STERNQUIST
R eport
2 02-31
Speidel,
1 76 ,
Brown and C . B.
Preliminary
1 968:
S tudien
F estschrift
z ur
Vor-
f ür
und
Nydam .
in G . und
Joachim
Zu römischen
Kossack
and
G .
Frühgeschichtlichen Werner
z um
6 5.
( Munich 1974) G .
W idengren ,
' Le symbolisme de la ceinture',
1 55
T ranica Antiqua, W ILSON 1929: i ssued i n Rome,
L .W .
VII,
Wilson ,
1968,
1 33-55
' Sculptural evidence of an army
by Marcus Aurelius', VII,
1929,
o rder
Memoirs of the American Academy
169-72
1 56
A N OTE ON R OMAN M ILITARY E QUIPMENT F ROM R OMANIA A lexandra D iaconescu and C oriolan Opreanu
We
have written this short note aware that the exchange of
i deas and i nformation i s e ssential when
a ttempting
t he
m ilitary equipment. Any
d isplay
and
e volution
o f
R oman
q uantitative approach t o t he s ubject i s bound to F irst
b ecause
t he
t o
b e
d iscuss
d ifficult.
n umber of artefacts one could excavate on a
s ite r epresents in f act but a small s ample,
and not
t he
i n use at that time.
t ypical
S econd, a reas
one,
o f
t hose
which
because a f airly l arge
were
n umber
o f
f inds
n ecessarily f rom
c ertain
a re not available to most s pecialists due to d ifficulties
i n e stablishing contexts or the availability of published r eports.
I nterim
r eports,
which
a re more f requent,
a void s mall f inds o r do
not
g ive
s ufficient
a rchaeological
and
t hus,
i mportant e lements of dating
c ontext
d ata
f inal
g enerally . bout
t he
a re m issing . I n Romania, were
in the
l ast 2 0 years,
l arge
s cale
e xcavations
p erformed on many Roman f orts producing mainly s mall f inds
c onsisting of mostly m ilitary equipment. n ear
f uture,
t his
b ronze objects,
m aterial,
We
hope
t hat
i n
t he
which we e stimate at around 1 ,000
will be published.
The authors have prepared for
p rint a f irst l ot of 1 50 p ieces f rom the auxiliary f ort at Giläu ( district of Cluj) s oon
m ore
a nd we have strong reasons
p ieces
f rom
P orolissum
l egionary f ortress at T urda s ome
o r
m useums
i n
t he
G herla
b elieve a nd
t hat
f rom
( Potaissa) will be published.
b ig private c ollections f rom the
v arious
t o
c ountry
t he S till
l ast c entury and t hose of
a re
n ot
y et
s ufficiently
e xplored. A
c ategory
o f equipment which calls f or s pecial attention
i s t he c avalry parade armour. S iliana, f ound
i n
1 978,
( Fig.1)
G arbsdh.
1
G iläu ,
horse
t he
d estruction abandonment
t he
f ort
of a la
t hree p ieces belonging to horse armour were armour
c onsists
c entral plate with t he image of Mars. l ast
i n
which were not included in the
The
2
At
l ayer o f
o f
J .
They
were
f ound
i n
t he
which could be dated immediately after
t he
f ort,
b een r eadjusted,
T he
two
c ommon type,
a lthough only one analogy f rom Roman Dacia c ould be
belong to a
The f ragment f rom Figure 2 was d iscovered in the fort
a t I nläceni
( district of Harghita) which
s everal r egiments, V III
equitata.
have
A .D.271-274.
which
c ohors
t o
a round
e ye-pieces, m entioned.
s eem
c atalogue
o f two eye-pieces and a
was
t he
g arrison
o f
among which two c ohortes equitatae are known:
R aetorum
c .R .
equitata .and c ohors
3
1 57
I V H ispanorum
T he r est ,
of what we c onsider t o be a c entral plate f or the
f ront of the horse, position
a nd
depict
a ttitude
t he
with
God t he
o f
W ar
s imilar
i n one
a n
i dentical
f rom Straubing
( Fig.3). 4 The only d ifference between these images i s the way of o utlining t he body. i ncisions,
The Mars of G iläu i s m arked with
A nother
bronze
object
p resenting
a rtefacts f rom other provinces i s a s tud a
s hield.
I t
was
f ound
d ecorated
with
f rom
w ith
The f lat d isc of the
t o s tud
an incision depicting the head of a g enius.
T he same pattern c an be i dentified on ( umbo)
s imilarities
( Fig.4,1) belonging
i n t he auxiliary f ort at Giläu i n an
a rchaeological context not yet dated. i s
c ontinuous
while the one f rom Straubing with s en ate points.
M ainz
M useum
( Fig.4,2).
a
c ircular
5
H .
b ronze
boss
Klumbach found good
analogies f or this motif on a stud attached to another boss f rom M ainz
( Fig.4,3)
( Fig.4,4). t he
and
6
on
a
helmet
f rom
Waal
n ear
N ijmegen
I t must be emphasized that the g enius f rom G iläu and
7
one on t he boss f rom Mainz Museum are a lmost i dentical,
only d ifference i s that the f irst one i s t he other one,
to the r ight.
I t i s not p roduced
i n
c lear
whether
by
i tinerant
K lumbach,
were
s upplied
c onsiderable d istance, e xistence
o f
or in t he same area,
c raftsmen p roduction
a Lwour by
o f
Syrian
c entres
t hat
t he
t o
h is
workshops,
as proved
officers
o f
s upplying the army with a ssumption
a rtefacts
w ere
or whether o rigin ,
a s
We think that
8
s hould
n ot
be
f or i t i s c lear that the R oman s oldier would b uy and
i n t he end s ell back his t roops
i dentical
Garbsch and P etculescu.
t he hypothesis of specific abandoned,
s uch
t he same workshop ,
t hey were made by c onsidered
the
l ooking t o the l eft and
by
t he
d ifferent
weapons theory
a nd
o f
m ilitary
s ometimes H unt
The
9
P ridianum .
r anks,
T he
s pecialised
e quipment,
i tinerant
u nit.
s ituated at a
s upports
c raftsmen
i n t he
i s
n ot
e ntirely convincing. On t he other hand, o ther
problems
objects, t he
1°
' Germanic'
T his
o f
t he
E mpire, t his
a ccount
t he
o rigin.
f inds
were l ocally
T hey
have
t hem
i n G ermania l ibera,
f inds,
p roduced
b een
i nto
t wo
d iscussed
i n
c ategories.
were f ound only
s o-called 1 976 by J . T he
t he
f irst
Outside the R oman
s trap-terminals
o f
T he s econd group has t he annular e xtension n ear
t he m id-point and s uch pieces are t o be f ound on m ilitary on
and
s hould be e xplained a s a matter of
s trap-terminals ending in a r ing.
c ategory.
s mall
O ldenstein has proved t hat the m inor
i s the c ase of the strap-teLminals of
O ldenstein who divides c overs
J .
l ike f ittings and pendants,
s imilarities
f ashion .
taking into
a rise.
s ites
l imes. As a matter of f act s trap-ends of t he f irst g roup
a ppear a lso in the Roman provinces.
J .
O ldenstein considers
t he
p resence of these objects a s an influence of the Germanic t ribes on
t he
R oman
m ilitary equipment, 1 58
against Raddatz who presumes
E7, Aav v ts 1 9 .
A
i g eb: 9A ‘ c i , S 7 2Z7
V 3V »
kr .
N rt yV e h .‘ 1 1- 3i e f i k ei4 , -
, 4 4 , ? ' v g s 7A .7 4 .
J
.
fort of G ilau
qv '
C avalry parade horse
6 ,
a
A
1 59
S .
e , l r e. • ; : , 4 „ •
( N I r s 1 • r 4
p g 4
•
• •• •••
•
. •
• • • • •_
• • •r " i t 4
• •
•
ts
j/ . 1. •
. . . . . .
L 1•
• •
1 60
t hat they must i nfluence. i s
have
a
R oman
o rigin
u nder
f ar more extensive than Oldenstein knew ,
b elieve that they were of Germanic origin. l east
P ontico-Sarmatian
However the d istribution of s trap-ends of both types
two
p ieces
( Edinburgh)
and
o f
i t
of
F rom
1 1
both
Romania
types
and
hard
have
o thers
ten
f rom
t he
I n
the
t ribes.
part of the Roman territory called Dacia Porolissensis
t here i s a strap-terminal ending in a r ing that belongs f irst
t o at
f rom Cramond
we
two
e xtra-provincial territory inhabited by D acian Northern
i s
f ar as we know ,
t his kind exist in Britain ,
N ewstead.
s trap-terminals
so , As
g roup
( Fig. 6 ,1).
I t
was
f ort at Giläu in a third century context porta principalis d extra) .12
t o
the
found at the South gate of the ( the
l evel
I Ib
o f
t he
Three strap-terminals of the second
g roup were also found in Dacia Porolissensis at Giläu and Turda. T he
p iece
f rom Giläu
( Fig.6,3) was discovered at the West gate
i n a s econd century context; o f
S amian
( Fig.6,2;
ware 4 ),
c ontaining
d ated
c ome
A . D.165-190
f rom
objects
1 0cm above this
a
1 9th
f rom the
( Fig.6,7;
two f rom Drobeta
on the r iver Olt, p rovince 16
-
8 )
two
1 5
f rom
one from the
t he
Another strap-terminal East
Eastern
B etween ( Dobrogea)
D acia t here
( Fig.6,9)
was
f ound
fort at Barbo9i
i n
( Fig.6,10)
and dated largely in
I nferior
was
a
( Oltenia)
l owland
a nd
t erritory
Moesia
( Fig. 6 ,11)
I nferior
populated by f ree Romans.
Two
f rom the s econd group have been f ound
in the Dacian s ettlement at Mätäsarul 9 - unfortunately only
one example the
i s
reproduced by the author who also omitted to g ive
relationship between the context and f inds.
i s dated to the
This
s ettlement
second and the third century A .D.
Germanic presence at the Low Danube in the s econd f irst
half
e vidence.
of
The
C laudius
t he
I IIrd century A .D.
I I
i n
A . D.270.
outside
Thus,
t he
and
t he
not s upported by any o f Gothicus
t he strap-terminals with an
at the mid point or
l ikely to be considered typical f inds
i s
f irst Roman emperor who got t he title
annular extension , t he
-
t he
1 7
a region probably controlled by the
s trap-terminals
i s
o f
t he third century A .D.
D acian tribes, here
coming
auxiliary
border
f rom a military s ite
belonging to the province Moesia Inferior 18 t he second and
t he
fort at Säpata de Jos
part of the country in the
6 )
' Limes Alutanus'
which seems to be occupied between A .D.205-242.
t he
there
there are f ive
( Fig. 6 ,5;
on the so called
f or a l ong time
and
c ollection
1 4
f rom f rom 1 9th century excavations, a t R acari
f ragment
The other two
1 3
private
called Dacia Inferior,
p ieces of the second group: f ort
found.
c entury
a
l egionary f ortress at Turda,
i s no dating evidence for them . I n the Southern part,
was
l evel,
at
t he
end,
a re
more
for Roman military equipment and
Roman Empire to be accepted as a Roman 1 61
i nfluence.
Yet,
it i s
not
c ertain
t hat
t he
P ontico-Sarmatian
origin could be denied. I f
publishing
bronze objects
previous conclusions, s till
valid.
For
d iscussed by Wild , a re
v ery
r are
( Fig. 5 ,1)
i nstance, 2°
t he
button-and-loop
i n Dacia.
We can mention one example from G iläu
belonging to Wild's Vc class, d ated
at
example
i s
l oop-fastener
belonging
a t o
t he
c lass
end
Vb,
which
was
f ound
of the s econd century A .D. with
f rom
enamelled
t he
f ort
Although very f ew in number ,
2 1
f asteners
which are f requent on Romano-British s ites,
c ontext
I nferior.
f rom Dacia could change some
in some other cases the old hypotheses are
head
i n
a
Another
( Fig.g,2)
at Barbo9i in Moesia
the
loop-fasteners f rom
t he Low Danube are unlikely to be imports f rom Britannia a s s uch artefacts could
be
l ocally
produced
u nder
t he
f ashion.
NOTES 1 .
D IACONESCU,
1983.
2 .
GARBSCH,
3 .
GUDEA ,
4 .
KEIM et al.,
5 .
KLUMBACH ,
6 .
I bid.
Fig.12,2.
7 .
I bid.
Fig.11,3.
8 .
PETCULESCU,
9 .
BREEZE,
1978.
1979,
2 58 P l.XXIII,7. 1951,
1 966,
1 0.
OLDENSTEIN ,
1 1.
RAE & RAE,
1 2.
I SAC e t al.,
1 3.
I SAC ,
1 4.
BAIUSZ,
1 5.
TUDOR,
9 4.
1974,
69-85. 195.
1981,
Figs.3 & 8 .
7 1-2 Nr.12.
1 980, 1976,
P 1.29.
392.
1976,
1 982,
Nr.17,
Fig.12,2.
1980,
1976,
26-7,
3 82 Nr.575, 1 28 Nr.45,
Pl.III;
48;
3,7 6 ,
Pl.IX,6,
1 62
9 .
Nr.206.
inluence
of
1 6.
TUDOR ,
1 965 ,
1 7.
CHRISTESCU ,
1 8.
SANIE,
1 9.
B ICHIR ,
2 0.
W ILD.
2 1.
SANIE,
2 49,
F ig.8,3,
1 935,
1 981,
1 970,
F iq.13,9.
1 81 Nr.27,
1 984,
4 .
5 7 Nr.3,
P 1.53,6. P l.LI,17.
1 37-46.
1 981,
1 81 Nr.26;
P 1.47,2.
B IBLIOGRAPHY BAIUSZ
1 980:
I stvän ',
I .
B IRCHIR 1 984: r omana, BREEZE
' Colec 5 . ia de antichit ki a l ui Tegläs
G h.
B irdhir,
G eto-dacii
1980,
a m
D .
B reeze,
B ritannia VII,
C HRISTESCU
nMuntenia i n
1 935:
V .
' The 1976 ,
epoca
ownership of arms in the Roman 9 3-5
Christescu,
' Le
" castellum"
S äpata-de Jos',
D acia V-VI,
1 935-6,
D IACONESCU 1 983: A .
D iaconescu,
in Marisia XIII,
GARBSCH
3 67-94
( BucareTti 1984)
1 976:
army',
B aiusz,
Acta M uzuel P orolissensis IV ,
1 978:
J .
Garbsch,
romain
d u
435-47 1983
Römische P aradeausrüstungen,
( München
1 978) GUDEA 1 979:
N .
G udea,
' Castrul
Muzuel P orolissensis I II, I SAC 1 982: I SAC e t
D .
a l.
I sac, 1 981:
D .
I sac,
N apocensis XVIII, 1 966:
Mainz', O LDENSTEIN
H .
K lumbach,
J .
1 980:
N .S.XXIV ,
L .
I nläcenil,
Acta
D iaconescu, d e
l a
C .
Opreanu,
G iläu',
Acta
' Porta Musei
85-97 ' Drei
Jahrbuche RGZM XIII, 1 976:
l a
1 982
c astrului
1 981,
Auxiliareinheiten ', P ETCULESCU
A .
d e
1 50-273
in Potaissa I II,
principalis d extra a
KLUMBACH
r oman
1 979 ,
1 966,
O ldenstein ,
' Zur
B ericht RGK 5 7, P etculescu,
1 980
1 63
r ömische
S chilbuckel aus
1 65-89 Austrüstung 1 976 ,
r ömischer
5 1-284
Review of GARBSCH 1978,
Dacia
RAE 1 974:
A .
& V .
Excavations SANIE
1 981:
Rae,
' The Roman fort
1954-1966',
S .
S anie,
TUDOR G .
( Iasi
1 965:
D .
Tudor,
Oltenia)',
TUDOR 1976: W ILD 1970:
D . J .P.
provinces',
Edinburgh.
1 63-224
- s ec
I I
P .e.n.
-
I II
1981) ' Castra Daciae I nferioris Säpaturile
Tocilescu in castrul
reg.
Cramond,
1 974,
C ivilizatia romana l a e st de C arpati s i
romanitatea pe territoriul Moldavei e .n.,
a t
Britannia V ,
roman de la Räcari
Apulum V ,
Tudor, Wild ,
1965,
2 33-57
in Drobeta I I,
1976
' Button-and-loop f asteners
Britannia I ,
1970,
l ui
( raionul F ilia9i,
1 37-55
i n
t he
R oman
4. 8 C M r d
• G:
(X 1 7 , 7 7 2
0
c ‘ i
0 4
r z 4 1 65
P. \
3
I f
41 ‘ ,
• . . . .
7
8
9 t o
1 Fig.6:
M ilitary
s trap
collection;
ends
3 .Gilau;
S äpata de Jos;
1 0.
f rom 1 . 5 ,6.
B arbo9i;
1 66
G ilau;
D robeta;
2 ,4. 7 ,8.
1 1. Mätäsaru
Turda private R acari;
9 .
E VIDENCE F OR T HE ROMAN A RMY
I N S OUTHWARK
M ichael Hammerson and Harvey S heldon
A
n umber
o f
R oman
f inds which may be m ilitary i n origin
have been f ound in S outhwark,
t he s uburb of Londinium which l ies
d irectly opposite to i t on the south bank
o f
t he
T hames.
T he
s trategic s ignificance of S outhwark was t hat i t l ay at the f irst p lace
upriver
which
c ould
be r eached by roads f rom t he major
e ntry points on the s outh coast ,
and where the Thames
c ould
be
b ridged. T he
d etailed
e xcavations
i n
d ecade and a half have provided a pproaching u ntil c .
t he
AD 5 0.
L ondinium) t o
g uard
r iver
b ank,
P ermanent
may
S outhwark
e vidence
o f
d uring two
m ajor
r oads
b ut neither n eed have been built
a ctivity
i n
S outhwark
n ot have begun until that date,
s upplies
t he l ast
( and
i ndeed
t hough the n eed
and
c ommunications
m ay
b e
e nvisaged
t hat
t he main C laudian invasion route f rom
t hereafter. I t K ent
i s
l ikely
( Watling Street) bypassed upriver,
North
T hames
f urther
s tands,
by a more southerly route.
s upported by the
S outhwark,
r eaching
t he
c lose to where Westminster B ridge now This l ong held s upposition i s
l ack of evidence f or early road construction in
S outhwark.' S tudy of the ancient topography a lso demonstrates t hat much o f t he l and n ear to the Thames between the more obvious c rossing p laces in North Southwark ( Westminster
B ridge)
( London
was
l ow
B ridge) .
l ying ,
c reeks s urrounded by mud-flats l ikely to be t ide.
a nd
N orth
L ambeth
consisting of inlets and s ubmerged
a t
high
2
A
f ort
m ay
b e
postulated
n ear
t o
where the armies of
C laudius crossed the Thames and this could have r emained in t hroughout
m uch
s ubsequent
c onstruction
B ridge.
T here
a nd F uentes
o f i s
t he
i nvasion o f
a
p eriod
d ownriver
i rrespective of the c rossing
a t
n o evidence f or i t though both Morris
( 1985) have advanced s uggestions f or
T opographic
e vidence
would
i ts
L ondon ( 1982)
l ocation.
f avour the l atter's hypothesis and
s everal s ites n ear to the E lephant and Castle which might s ome
u se
t hrow
l ight on the matter may shortly be examined in t he context
o f r e-development. E vidence
f or
t he
c onstruction
o f
t he
r oads
i n
N orth
S outhwark and the topography have been d iscussed previously.
3
I t
s eems probable that t he road-building and a ssociated engineering 1 67
work
( land drainage,
revetting and bridge building) was c arried
out by the Roman army.
I t i s also l ikely that the military
were
involved subsequently in the use of l and on both banks a s a base f or the transport and distribution of s upplies. At
the
t ime
of
c lassed as items of t hese, or
4
writing some thirty pieces that might be
military
equipment
s ome might be pre-Flavian ,
have
been
though many come
f ound.
Of
f rom F lavian
l ater contexts. Excavations have also produced 1 0 r egular and 1 06 i rregular
C laudian coins. t he
These are most common on s ites
c opies are of good style c ommonest
S outhwark
and
types
were perhaps struck c .
the are
B ritain.
C omparison
l ater
ones
where
the earlier
a re
poor.
T he
of an intermediate grade which
AD 5 0-55.
The proportion of copies of
t he
Southwark with other s ites t hose
in Britain
army was present during the pre-Flavian period:
( 92%) i st
i s one
of
t he
highest
i n
c entury coin distribution in
shows that
i t
i s
most
s imilar
t o
f rom coastal or e stuarine supply bases of this period such
a s Richborough,
Fishbourne,
Fingringhoe and Sea M ills.
5
A l ist of Roman military objects d iscovered in Southwark i s g iven
below.
The numbers refer to those on the distribution map
( Fig:/ ). Harness or Belt F ittings:
1 .
Topping's Wharf
2 .
Bonded Warehouse,
3 . 4 ,5,6. ' Auxiliary'
199 B orough H igh Street Courage Brewery
Cavalry Harness Pendants: 8 .
Topping's Wharf
9 .
D istrict Heating Scheme
1 0,11. 1 2. Lorica Buckles:
C ingulum bosses:
Other decorative bosses
Pls.1 & 2 :
Montague C lose
Auxiliary
1 3,14.
1 5-23
S outhwark Street
Courage Brewery 1 3-14 Arcadia Buildings
1 5.
1 5-23 Southwark Street
1 6.
1 -7 S t Thomas'
Street
1 7.
1 5-23 Southwark Street
1 8.
Hibernia Wharf
and
harness
s tuds
c ommonly
p endants
S treet. 1 68
f rom
d escribed
1 5-23
a s
o f
S outhwark
N J
1 69
P 1.3
i
S ca le 3 : 1 Fig. 1
1 70
'military' type: Iron Bolt-heads:
Scabbard M ounts:
19. 199 Borough High Street 20,21. Courage Brewery 22. 201-11 Borough High Street (see SLEA C 1978, fig.63,18; the object is of an uncorruron size and shape (triangular section) and there is uncertainty as to w}:lether it is in fact a weapon-head) 23. 199 Borough High Street
24,25. 1-7 St Thomas' Street
'Military'-type Buckles: 26,27. 175-177 Borough High Street Pair of mounts from a Dolabra Sheath: 28. 15-23 Southwark Street Small Bronze Phallus with Suspension Loop: 29. 15-23 Southwark Street Lead Centurial Property-identification tag, 30. Courage Brewery Corneli Verecundi':
inscribed
'C
Q
Carnelian Intaglio, depicting an eagle between two standards: 31. 1-7 St Thomas' Street There is also a record (J. Brit. Archaeol. Assoc. xxiv, 1968, 309) of an iron object found in Stoney Street in 1865. This was considered to be a gladiator's �rident when discovered, but it has been suggested that it is part of a military standard. In addition to the irregular Claudian coins, which may have been struck by the army or the administration in Britain, a coin of Nero, stamped with a counter-mark of Vitellius (AD 69) was found at 15-23 Southwark S�reet. The late Dr c. Kraay informed us that only four other examples of this counterrnark are known, and that all the provenanced examples are from Britain. The counterrnark may therefore have been produced by adherents to the side of Vitellius serving in Britain. Apart from coins and objects, attention might also be drawn to two ranges of buildings r�cently found in Southwark. Pl.3:
Lorica segmentata buckle from Arcadia Buildings (X-ray).
Fig.l: Carnelian gemstone with legionary Thomas' Street (scale 6:1) 171
notif
from
1-7
St
F irstly, l ocation) t imber
at
1 5-23
a l arge
p iles
built in
c entury
beneath
AD
F urther
i st
7 4
e arly
s tone
s tone
t o
building
d endrochronological
c omplex
no.10 for w ith
f oundations may have been
f ounded buildings whole
( see F ig. -I ,
c ourtyard
t he stone wall
a ccording
s ize and date of the public
S outhwark Street
evidence.
6
l ay to the west and the
s uggests
t hat
t hey
were
rather than private.
Secondly,
a
d iscovery
i mplying
between Southwark and the army came s ettlement,
at
l ocation).
a later Roman connection
f rom the north-west
Winchester Palace in 1 984
There,
i nscription came
f ragments
of
f rom a bath suite,
a
( see F ig.L, l arge
of
t he
no.32 for
multi-panelled
probably the western part of
a s ubstantial stone building. Most
of the surviving f ragments
g rouped according to Cohorts, this
was
a
d edication
l ist names which have been
and it has
been
s uggested 7
that
by a detachment of l egionary soldiers.
Most of the dedicatory inscription itself has been l ost but c losest
parallel
Lambaesis. d ate
The
s hortly
t he
appears to be a dedication to Julia Mamaea at
f requency of the praenomen Aurelius
i ndicates
a
after Caracalla's extension of the c itizenship in
AD 2 13. I n conclusion , Roman
military
we c an therefore envisage
personnel in Southwark,
t hough not on present evidence before c . pre-Flavian
presence
of
AD
5 0.
Any
p resumed
f ort connected either with the Claudian campaign or
l ater phases of the conquest i s g round
t he
during the i st century,
l ikely t o be
s ituated
t o the south of the area shown on Fig.U . ,
f inds support the suggestion that
a
s upply
on
f irm
though the coin
base
was
l ocated
within Southwark during much of this period. Later f inds which might be connected with soldiers, t he
inscription
f rom
W inchester Palace,
presence in Southwark of
m ilitary
such as
could derive f rom the
p ersonnel
i nvolved
in
t he
n ature
and
administration of Britain. More
archaeological
evidence
d evelopment of Roman Southwark i s still
about
the
u rgently
b eing
s ought
and it i s to be hoped that the extent of military involvement in the
l ife
of
t he
s ettlement
w ill
progresses.
NOTES 1 .
SHELDON ,
2 .
GRAHAM,
1978. 1978.
1 72
become
c learer
a s
work
®F ind I .
n u mber
R oman
R oad ( known ) „ ( p ro jec ted)
L and o ver+ 1 .0m O .D . E dge o f C hanne ls 0
Fig. 2
1 73
1 00
2 00
m .
3 .
GRAHAM,
1978;
SHELDON ,
4 .
HAMMERSON ,
1978;
5 .
HAMMERSON ,
1 978.
6 .
SHELDON & TYERS,
7 .
HASSALL & TOMLIN ,
1978.
SHELDON ,
1978.
1983. 1985.
B IBLIOGRAPHY FUENTES 1985:
N .
Fuentes,
Archaeologist, GRAHAM
1 978:
A .
Southwark'
Graham ,
M .
in
Excavations
1 985, MORRIS
c astles
and
e lephants',
London
' The geology and topography of North
Hammerson ,
Hammerson
' The coins'
f orthcoming,
in SLAEC 1 978 S outhwark
and
( to
be
Lambeth
I )
HASSALL & TOMLIN : in 1984
' Of
Autumn 1985
in SLAEC 1 978
HAMMERSON 1 978: updated
5 :4,
I I.
M .W .C.
Hassall & R .S.O.
I nscriptions:
A .
Tomlin ,
Monumental'
' Roman Britain
in Britannia
XVI,
3 17-22
1 982:
J .
Morris,
Londinium.
London in the Roman Empire,
( London 1982) S HELDON 1978:
H .L.
Sheldon ,
' The
1 972-4
contribution to Southwark's history' S HELDON
&
TYERS
1 983:
H .L.
Sheldon
e xcavations:
t heir
in SLAEC 1 978 &
I .
Tyers,
' Recent
dendrochronological work in Southwark and its implications', London Archaeologist, SLAEC
1 978:
Committee,
Southwark
4 : 1 3, &
1983,
Lambeth
Archaeological
No.1,
Soc . and Surrey Archaeol.
Soc.,
1 978
1 74
1 972-1974,
Excavation
Joint Pub.
Southwark Excavations
London & Middlesex Archaeol.
3 55-61
THE
D RAWN L .
This m ade
e xperiment
in 1 981
d uring
in
the
Morgan
c arried
out to check the
' The Pedite Gladius'l
1 983
R oman
S heffield University. t he
was
SWORD
M ilitary
d rawn
were officers'
a cross
S eminar
held
the body,
that are in excess of 2 0in
weapons and worn on the
beinq he
l eft
hip
Fulham
sword
f rom its s cabbard on the
I n 1983
it was demonstrated by a
f ully
presented no d ifficulty when drawn
r ight hip with
w ith the wearer kitted out
and
f elt f ar too l ong to be removed
r ight hip.
t he author and members of the Ermine Street Guard that r econstructed
at
Hazell had suggested that s uch weapons as
2
f rom a s cabbard on the
and s ubsequently discussed
Equipment
Fulham and Mainz pattern blades,
i n l ength,
statements
t he
r ight
hand,
e ven
in a Corbridge B lorica s egmentata.
Our experiments were expanded to tests with a spatha having a
blade
l ength of 2 51 2i / n.
These were carried out while wearing a
orica s egmentata and with the r econstructed Corbridge B l s uspended a rmpit.
on
t he
r ight
hip
with
s patha
t he pommel under the right
The grip with the r ight hand was managed with ease,
s word
withdrawn
e asily.
3
w ith at
the
l east an inch to spare and sheathed as
NOTES 1 .
HAZELL ,
1982.
2 .
BISHOP,
1983
3 .
Further reinforced by Connolly's experiments
in
t he
s addle,
this volume.
B IBLIOGRAPHY B ISHOP
1 983:
M .C.
B ishop
( ed.),
Roman
Military
Equipment.
Proceedings o f a Seminar Held i n the Department of History
and
Sheffield, HAZELL
1 982:
Journal
C lassical
2 1st March P .
6 1,
1 983,
Hazell, 1 982,
Archaeology
at
Ancient
the University of
( Sheffield 1 983)
' The
7 3-82
1 75
pedite
g ladius',
Antiquaries
I NDEX
Aalen Museum:
8
c andidati s implares:
A emilius Paullus: A lgeria:
5 9
Agrippa:
5 2,
A lbano:
4 1
C aracalla: C arlisle:
6 2
A lexander:
c arnyx: 3 0
A lexandria:
1 47
C arnuntum :
1 43
1 10,
1 20,
5 6
C astellum D immidi:
Apamea S yriae:
1 43
C astleford:
Aquileia:
143
C ato:
145
C ave of L etters:
6 2
A rsinoite nome: Augustus:
5 4,
5 5
6 2
4 3,
1 45
6 2
48,
4 9
45
c enturions:
6 1
c hain mail:
9 2,
4 3 9 3
C hatsworth relief:
Aurelius S urus:
5 6,
1 6
Aquincum: A rrian:
1 33
2 9
C arthage:
5 6
5 9
1 72
C herchel M useum :
4 3
C hester B aden:
1 32
Abbey G reen:
B arberini N ilotic mosiac: B arbo9i:
D eanery
1 61
f ittings: 8 8,
1 14
9 0,
1 41,
5 7,
1 05,
1 43,
5 9,
H unter S treet:
1 16,
H unters Walk:
1 68
N ewgate: 4 7
1 32 1 48
C hichester:
B ishapur:
1 43
C ichorius:
B oulogne:
1 23
c ingulum :
1 14
B ridgeness:
5 7,
c lassiarii:
B rigetio:
1 45
c lavarium:
3 9
C laudius I I:
2 9
b uckles:
c lavi:
9 0,
1 43,
b urial s hrouds:
1 71
f asteners:
c ab :
1 01
4 8,
6 0,
3 9 1 13,
1 32
4 3
148
D acia P orolissensis: d ecurions:
6 2
9 9,
6 0
D oorwerth:
1 61
6 1
dolabra s heath:
1 05
1 71
1 32
D omitius Ahenobarbus:
9 4
C ancelleria r elief:
49
D ura-Europos:
c andidati duplares:
5 9
6 1, 1 48
1 76
6 7
5 4
c ornicines:
1 45
c altrop:
6 0,
1 65
c aeruleus: c aligae:
1 41
1 61
S heepen : C ordova:
5 8, 2 4
44,
C olchester: 1 62,
9 3
9 6
1 01
4 3,
c loaks:
4 3
b utton and loop
C aerleon:
9 2
4 5
5 7,
brooches: bucina:
9 2
1 33 44,
C irencester: 5 4
8 7
8 5
O ld Market Hall: C hester P ageant:
B eth P haseil:
B regenz:
9 3,
F oregate S treet:
4 2,
B elvedere s arcophagus: B esançon:
8 5
F ield :
9 4
B atavian revolt: b elt
5 2
8 , 7 7,
46,
4 1 5 4 ,
1 03,
5 5 , 1 47,
Egypt:
4 3,
E ining:
4 7
l orica
s egmentata:
1 43
1 69 , l orica
F ayyum shield: f ibula: T .
4 2,
1 06,
49
L ugdunum
F lavius Felix:
F rodsham:
s quamata:
8 1 43
1 75
L unt
( the):
l unula: G aius:
1 23
L uxor:
G aius Romanius: G ellius:
4 1
g ladius:
1 10,
1 1 1 75
M ainz:
6 1,
6 2,
1 45
3 9
3 0
1 32,
1 47,
M arcus Column: 1 32
1 11,
h elmets,
M ars:
1 41
1 58
m iles: 1 12
1 61
1 45
m imesis:
1 11
M isene f leet: H od H ill: H ofheim :
1 23,
1 32
4 3
1 57
M ätäsaru:
I mperialG allic:
munifices:
5 8
5 9
1 32
horse armour: hobnails:
1 59
Nahal Hever:
8 9
4 3,
1 46
I nläceni:
N euß:
48,
1 43
1 32
1 46,
1 47
N iedermörmter: N iederbieber:
J udgement of Solomon: J ulia Mammaea:
1 48 1 46
5 2
1 72
J ulii monument:
Oberstimm :
1 1
O ctavian: O stia:
1 23 6 2
1 01
3 2
K empten:
1 14
K hisfine:
p aenula:
1 47
K neller Hall
8
1 47
l ituus:
2 9
L ondon:
1 33,
L ongthorpe:
43
5 8,
3 6
p apilio:
5 9
P arthia:
7 7 1 13,
phalera:
1 47
p ila: 1 32
P lato:
1 11,
1 71 6 0,
1 41
3 0,
p raetorium:
1 77
5 6,
1 11
P ompeii: 1 41
1 01
1 18 6 7
1 16,
1 41
6 1
P iazza Amerini:
1 47
6 0,
P hiladelphia: phallus mount:
1 05
l orica hamata:
5 3,
P annonian mutiny:
p endants:
1 13
l imitaneus:
M il.
Music):
K refeld-Gellup :
l ati c lavii:
48,
P alestrina: ( Roy.
C oll. K ünzing:
4 7,
1 61
I ntercisa:
kakaki:
45,
5 8 Naqsh-i-Rustam:
I llyria:
l ancea:
1 71 1 13
1 57
Ham H ill: hasta:
1 48
1 18 5 6,
M ahillon:
4 1
9 3,
1 41
1 32
Lydney P ark:
1 41,
G lanum relief: G ilau:
8 7,
l unate pendants:
F ulham sword:
1 21,
8 9,
1 10,
( battle of):
l uggage tags:
9 2
49,
1 72
4 1, 48
5 3,
6 1
6 2
Q uintillian:
4 2,
U nits
48
a lae R ottweil: R ielves:
S iliana:
2 4
c ohortes
5 9
R ißtissen:
1 23,
R heingönheim:
I V H ispanorum
1 32
R hine f rontier: R acari:
e quitata:
3 9
7
s addle s tiffeners:
equitata:
I Tungrians:
1 57 6 3
l egions
8
I Adiutrix:
1 41
6 2,
I I Adiutrix:
1 01
S allustius Lucullus:
1 57
A sturian(s):
1 47
s addle covers:
S alaria:
5 4
V III Raetorum c .v.
s agum :
1 57
XX P almyrenorum :
1 32
1 61
S aalburg:
1 57
I I Augusta:
1 14
1 45
6 2 1 23
1 14,
148
I II Augusta:
6 0
Sk oata d e Jos:
1 61
X III Gemina:
1 23
I I Parthica:
1 43
S alzburg:
S assanians:
7 7
s cabbard mounts: s cale
a rmour
1 45, ( see
XX Valeria
1 71
V ictrix:
l orica
5 1,
6 0,
1 03,
1 41,
1 49
S outh S hields:
1 47
s patha:
1 4,
1 41,
Augusti: 1 47,
1 48,
S trabo:
Varro:
9 0 1 20,
5 2,
Verecundus:
1 58
Verulamium:
1 01
Vespasian:
5 3,
1 43
1 47
T hracian c avalry: T itiani:
V imose:
1 01
T erentius f resco: T horsbjerg:
t uba:
C olumn:
t unic
44,
3 9
1 03,
( civilian): ( Potaissa):
1 71 1 14
1 58 1 24
W ickford:
43
3 9
W inchester P alace:
4 1 48
1 61
1 14,
4 6,
Z ilten mosiac: Z ugmantel:
U lpian:
5 3,
Voralpenland:
4 2
Waltersdorf: 6 0
t unicati d iscincti: T urda
1 00
Waddon:
5 7
5 4
1 47
V indonissa:
Waal:
1 48
2 9
t ubicen:
6 1,
1 01
V itellius:
t rierarchus:
6 0,
44
V indolanda:
1 24
T orre de P acliglione: 1 02,
5 3,
1 32
9 4
T rajan's
1 23
6 0
v exillarius: T acitus:
9 9 ,
7
v enetus:
1 32
5 1
S uetonius:
1 6,
1 47
s trap ends: S trasbourg: S traubing:
7 ,
1 45
4 3
Vegetius:
6 3
S tatilii:
Valkenburg: Vechten :
( see hasta)
1 43
e quites s ingulares
1 05,
1 69 s pears
9 4
numerus D ivitensium:
s quamata) s cuta:
5 7,
6 1
1 78
1 47
6 0
1 72
1 23,