171 47 144MB
English Pages [272] Year 1982
The Roman Military Defence of the British Provinces in its Later Phases Derek A. Welsby
BAR British Series I o I
1982
B.A.R.,
B.A.R.
122
Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7BP, England
GENERAL EDITORS A. R. Hands, B.Sc., M.A ., D.Phil. D. R. Walker, M.A.
B.A.R. 101, 1982: 'The Roman Military Defence of the British Provinces in its Later Phases'
©
Derek A.Welsby, 1982
The author’s moral rights under the 1988 UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act are hereby expressly asserted. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be copied, reproduced, stored, sold, distributed, scanned, saved in any form of digital format or transmitted in any form digitally, without the written permission of the Publisher. ISBN 9780860541783 paperback ISBN 9781407317090 e-book DOI https://doi.org/10.30861/9780860541783 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available at www.barpublishing.com
CO N T E N T S
T itle L ist
P age N o.
o f M aps a nd F igures
A cknowledgements I NTRODUCTION C hapter
1
1 R oman F rontier D evelopment
3
C hapter 2
T he T hird C entury
8
C hapter 3
T he A rchaeological E vidence f or t he H istory o f F orts i n t he L ater T hird C entury
3 4
F orts w ithout A ngle-Towers, A rtillery a nd t he P rovision o f P rojecting T owers
6 0
B ritain u nder C onstantius C hlorus, A D 2 96-306
6 8
F rom C onstantius C hlorus t o C ount T heodosius
9 1
C hapter 4
C hapter 5
C hapter 6
C hapter
7
A D 3 67,
T he
' Barbarica C onspiratio'
a nd C ount T heodosius
1 04
T he L ast F our D ecades o f R oman M ilitary O ccupation
1 25
C hapter 9
T he N otitia D ignitatum
1 33
C hapter
T he F unction o f T owns i n t he M ilitary D efence o f t he B ritish D iocese
1 46
C hapter 8
C hapter
1 0
1 1
T he E vidence f or t he P resence o f L aeti a nd F oederati i n L ater R oman B ritain
C ONCLUSION A ppendix 1
A ppendix 2
1 65 T he C hronology o f t he S tone F orts a nd V ici a t C hesterholm
1 69
AN ote o n P ottery S upplies t o N orthern M ilitary S ites i n t he F ourth C entury
1 70
A bbreviations B ibliography I ndex o f P lace N ames M aps a nd F igures
1 57
M APS A ND F IGURES
Map
1
M ilitary s ites o ccupied i n t he t hird a nd/or f ourth c enturies.
Map
2
T he d istribution o f C rambeck p archment w ares o n m ilitary s ites
( Corder t ypes
5 b,
7 ,
8 ,
9a nd
Map
3
T he N otitia D ignitatum O ccidentis,
F ig
1 .1
C arpow
1 .2
B rancaster
2 .1
R eculver
2 .2
P iercebridge
F ig
F ig 3 .1 3 .2 F ig 4 .1
F ig
F ig
F ig
F ig
F ig
F ig
( St J oseph
( Philp
1 969C)
( Keeney
B urrow-in-Lonsdale E lslack
1 939-43;
( Hildyard
( Collingwood
B radwell
1 936)
S cott a nd L arge 1 954)
1 930B)
( Johnson J 1 976A)
W alton C astle
( Johnson J 1 976A)
5 .1
R ichborough
5 .2
D over
( Johnson J 1 976A)
6 .1
L ympne
6 .2
P evensey
7 .1
P ortchester
7 .2
B urgh C astle
8 .1
C ardiff
8 .2
B aginton
( Hobley
9 .1
B itterne
( Cunliffe
9 .2
C aister-by-Yarmouth
1 0.1
C aistor ( Lincs) ( Todd 1 973) H orncastle ( Todd 1 973)
( Cunliffe
1 977;
P hilp
1 981)
( Johnson J 1 976A) ( Peers
1 952)
( Cunliffe
1 975)
( Morris A 1 948)
( Nash-Williams
1 969)
1 974) 1 977) ( Ellison
1 1.1
B rough-on-Humber
1 1.2
M ancetter
F ig
1 2.1 1 2.2
C aves I nn ( Webster 1 974) W all ( Webster 1 974)
F ig
1 3.1
S tretton B ridge
F ig
c hapter X L.
( Birley A 1 967)
4 .2
1 0.2
1 0).
1 3.2
R ed H ill
1 3.3
W apping
( Wacher
( Webster
1 969)
1 974)
( Webster
( Webster
1 966)
1 974)
( Johnson T 1 975)
1 974)
1 978)
F ig
1 4.1
R ichborough f ortlet
1 4.2 1 4.3
B arrack F ell ( Collingwood W reay ( Bellhouse 1 953)
F ig
1 5.1 1 5.2
S caftworth ( Bartlett a nd R iley N ewbrough ( Hepple)
F ig
1 6.1 1 6.2 1 6.3
C ardunock m ilefortlet 5 ( Simpson a nd H odgson C aer G ybi ( RCHM A nglesey 1 968)
1 6.4 1 6.5 F ig
1 7.1
( Cunliffe
1 968)
1 931A)
1 958)
1 948)
H untcliff ( Hornsby a nd S tanton 1 912) S carborough ( Collingwood 1 931B) G oldsborough ( Hornsby a nd L averick 1 932)
1 7.2
S outh S hields n orth g ate H ardknot s outh-east g ate
( Dore a nd G illam 1 979) ( Collingwood 1 928B)
1 7.3 1 7.4
C astell C oh en s outh-east g ate ( Alcock 1 964) B ewcastle w est g ate ( Richmond, H odgson a nd S t J oseph
1 7.5 1 7.6A
R isingham s outh g ate ( Richmond 1 936) C hesterholm s outh g ate ( Birley R 1 970)
1 7.6B 1 7.7
C hesterholm w est g ate ( Birley 1 931) R eculver s outh g ate ( Philp 1 969C)
1 938)
F ig 1 8.1 1 8.2
F ig
P iercebridge w est g ate ( Keeney 1 939-43) B urrow-in-Lonsdale s outh g ate ( Hildyard 1 954)
1 8.3 1 8.4A 1 8.4B
B aginton s outh g ate ( Hobley 1 974) R ichborough f ortlet w est g ate ( Cunliffe 1 968) R ichborough f ort w est g ate ( Johnson J 1 976A)
1 8.4C
R ichborough f ort n orth p ostern
1 8.5
B urgh C astle e ast g ate
1 8.6 1 8.7
A mbleside s outh g ate ( Collingwood 1 915) L ympne e ast g ate ( Cunliffe 1 980)
1 9.1A 1 9.1B 1 9.1C
P evensey w est g ate ( Johnson J 1 976A) P evensey e ast g ate ( Peers 1 952) P evensey n orth p ostern ( Johnson J 1 976A)
1 9.2A 1 9.2B
P ortchester w est g ate ( Cunliffe 1 975) P ortchester n orth g ate ( Cunliffe 1 975)
F ig 2 0.1
C ardiff n orth g ate
( Johnson J 1 976A)
( Harrod 1 859)
( Ward 1 901)
2 0.2A 2 0.2B
B rough-on-Humber n orth g ate ( Wacher 1 969) B rough-on-Humber w est g ate ( Wacher 1 969)
2 0.3 2 0.4 2 0.5
B ainbridge e ast g ate ( Collingwood 1 928A) R isingham w est g ate ( Richmond 1 936) C orbridge n orth g ate o f u nited c ompounds ( Birley a nd R ichmond
F ig 2 1.1 2 1.2
1 938)
K nag B urn g ateway ( Birley 1 937) M ilecastle 5 2 s outh g ate ( Simpson a nd R ichmond
1 935)
2 1.3
H igh R ochester w est g ate
( Bruce 1 857; J obey I a nd W elsby)
2 1.4A 2 1.4B 2 1.5
M alton e ast g ate ( period 5 A) ( Corder 1 930) M alton e ast g ate ( period 6 ) ( Corder 1 930) D over c hassis B ritannica f ort's e ast g ate ( Philp
2 1.6 2 1.7A
E lslack s outh g ate Nay 1 910) C aernarvon n orth-west g ate ( period I II)
( Wheeler
1 921)
2 1.7B
C aernarvon s outh-west g ate
( Wheeler
1 922A)
( period I II)
1 981)
F ig 2 2.1 2 2.2 2 2.3 2 2.4 2 2.5A 2 2.5B 2 2.6 2 2.7 2 2.8 2 2.9
F ig 2 3.1A 2 3.1B 2 3.2 2 3.3 2 3.4
F ig 2 4.1A 2 4.1B
G heriat e l-Garbia n orth a ngle-tower ( Mattingly D a nd W elsby) R eculver w est a ngle ( Philp 1 958) B urgh C astle n orth-east a ngle-tower ( Morris A 1 948) C ardiff n orth-east a ngle-tower ( Wheeler 1 922B) R ichborough s outh-west a ngle-tower ( Cunliffe 1 968) R ichborough i nterval-tower o n w est w all ( Cunliffe 1 968) P ortchester i nterval-tower o n w est w all(Cunliffe 1 975) D over i nterval-tower o n w est w all ( Philp 1 981) B radwell i nterval-tower o n w est w all ( Johnson J 1 976A ) L ympne i nterval-tower 9 ( Cunliffe 1 980)
Y ork i nterval-tower S W5 ( Sumpter a nd C oll Y ork w est a ngle-tower ( Multangular t ower) ( RCHM Y ork 1 962)
H igh R ochester n orth-east a ngle-tower ( Richmond 1 936) C aer G ybi n orth-west a ngle-tower ( RCHM A nglesey 1 968) C hester n orth r ampart b uilding w est o f g ate ( Davey 1 973)
Y ork n orth-east r ampart b uilding ( M MM Y ork 1 962) Y ork n orth-west r ampart b uilding a nd i nterval-tower N W5 ( RCHM Y ork 1 962)
2 4.2
M alton n orth-east r ampart b uilding
2 4.3
G reat C hesters s outh r ampart b uilding
2 4.4
H igh R ochester w est r ampart b uilding
F ig 2 5.1 2 5.2A 2 5.2B 2 5.3A 2 5 .3B 2 5.3C 2 5.4
( Corder
1 930)
( Daniels ( Daniels
1 980A) 1 980A)
G reat C hesters w est r ampart b uildings ( Daniels 1 980A) R isingham w est r ampart b uilding ( Daniels 1 980A ) R isingham s outh r ampart b uilding ( Daniels 1 980A) C hesterholm b uilding o n t he e ast r ampart ( Birley
1 931)
C hesterholm n orth r ampart b uilding a nd n orth-west a ngle-tower ( Birley 1 932) C hesterholm b uilding I V o n t he e ast r ampart ( Bidwell 1 981) P iercebridge l atrine b uilding i n n orth-east a ngle ( Richardson
F ig 2 6A
1 977)
1 936)
H ousesteads n orth r ampart b uildings e ast o f n orth g ate
2 6D
( Daniels a nd G illam ) uildings w est o f n orth g ate H ousesteads n orth r ampart b ( Daniels 1 980A) nd l ate i nterval-tower H ousesteads e ast r ampart b uilding a ( Daniels a nd G illam) nterval-tower nd l ate i uilding a H ousesteads s outh r ampart b
2 6E
( Daniels 1 980A) H ousesteads w est r ampart b uildings
2 6B 2 6C
( Daniels
1 980A)
F ig 2 7.1 2 7.2 2 7.3
H altonchesters b ath-house i n p raetentura
( Daniels
2 7.4A
R eculver b ath-house i n p raetentura
( Philp
1 969C)
2 7.4B
R eculver b ath-house i n p raetentura ( Philp C aernarvon b ath-house ' B' i n p raetentura ( Davies a nd C asey 1 978)
1 969C)
2 7.5A 2 7.5B
F ig 2 8.1 2 8.2 2 8.3A 2 8.3B 2 8.4
1 978A)
E bchester b ath-house ( Maxfield a nd R eed 1 975) B recon G aer b ath-house i n p raetentura ( Nash-Williams 1 969)
C aernarvon b ath-house ' S' i n p raetentura ( Davies a nd C asey 1 979) L ympne b ath-house
( Smith
1 852)
R ichborough b ath-house ( Philp 1 969C) I lkley C onstantian g ranary ( Hartley 1 966) I lkley T heodosian g ranary ( Hartley 1 966) S outh S hields g ranary ( building C 12) ( Dore a nd G illam 1 979)
F ig 2 9.1 2 9.2 F ig 3 0.1 3 0.2 F ig 3 1.1 3 1.2A 3 1.2B
B ainbridge A ntonine p rincipia B rough-on-Noe p rincipia
C aernarvon p rincipia t hird c entury B ainbridge p rincipia t hird c entury
3 2.2
F ig 3 3.1 3 3.2
1 969) 1 969B)
( Wheeler ( Hartley
1 940)
C hesterholm p rincipia t hird c entury ( Birley 1 936) S outh S hields p rincipia t hird c entury ( Richmond)
B rancaster p rincipia R eculver p rincipia
( Edwards a nd G reen 1 977)
( Philp
1 969C)
F ig 3 4.1 3 4.2
L ympne p rincipia ( Smith 1 852) R ichborough p rincipia ( Johnson J 1 976A)
F ig 3 5.1
R isingham p rincipia f ourth c entury
( Richmond
H igh R ochester p rincipia
1 936)
3 5.2
1 922A) 1 969)
C arpow p rincipia e arly t hird c entury ( Birley A 1 967) C orbridge ' principia' i n w est c ompound t hird c entury ( Richmond a nd B irley 1 940) C orbridge ' principia' i n w est c ompound f ourth c entury ( Richmond a nd B irley
F ig 3 2.1
( Hartley
( Jones G a nd W ild
( Richmond
F ig 3 6.1 3 6.2
C aernarvon p rincipia f ourth c entury
F ig 3 7.1
H ousesteads p rincipia l ate f ourth c entury ( Bosenquet D robreta ' principia' t hird c entury ( Florescu 1 967)
3 7.2
F ig 3 8.1
F ig 3 9.1 3 9.2
( Wheeler
1 936)
C hesterholm p rincipia f ourth c entury
P almyra p rincipia, D iocletianic
( Birley
( Richmond
C arpow p raetorium e arly t hird c entury L ancaster p raetorium t hird c entury ( Richmond 1 959; L eather 1 973)
1 922A ) 1 936)
1 963)
( Birley A 1 967)
1 904)
F ig 4 0.1
C aersws p raetorium t hird c entury
( Nash-Williams
4 0.2
B rough-on-Noe p raetorium e arly f ourth c entury ( Jones G a nd W ild 1 969A )
4 0.3
C aernarvon p raetorium f ourth c entury
F ig 4 1.1A 4 1.1B F ig 4 2.1 4 2.2 4 2.3 F ig 4 3.1A 4 3.1B 4 3.2 4 3.3 F ig 4 4.1A 4 4.1B 4 4.1C 4 4.2 4 4.3 4 4.4
I lkley p raetorium e arly f ourth c entury I lkley p raetorium l ate f ourth c entury
C hesters c halets i n p raetentura
( Hartley ( Hartley
( Daniels
1 980A) 1 980A)
H igh R ochester ' chalets' ( Daniels 1 980A) H igh R ochester ' chalets' ( Daniels 1 980A) H igh R ochester c halets ( Daniels 1 980A ) C aernarvon s ite V II ( Daniels 1 980A) M alton c halets ( Corder) E bchester ' chalets' p eriod V II
( Maxfield a nd R eed 1 975)
W allsend b uilding
1 2
( early f orm)
W allsend b uilding
1 2
( late f orm)
4 5.B
W allsend b uilding
4 5.0 4 5.D
W allsend b uilding 1 0 W allsend b uilding 1 1
9 ( Daniels ( Daniels ( Daniels
I lkley s table i n p raetentura
( Daniels ( Daniels
1 980A) 1 980A)
1 980A ) 1 980A) 1 980A)
( Hartley
1 966)
4 6.2 4 6.3
W allsend p eriod I I s table i n p raetentura
4 6.4 4 6.5
M aryport p eriod I II b uildings ( Jarrett 1 976) R avenglass b arracks p hase 3 ( Potter 1 979A)
B owness-on-Solway b uilding b y w est g ate
( Daniels
1 976)
( Potter 1 979A)
R eculver b uilding i n l atera p raetorii ( Philp 1 969C) E bchester b uilding b y t he n orth-west a ngle
4 7.3
( Jarrett 1 960A) P apcastle b arrack-block
4 7.4
B ainbridge t hird-century b arracks
F ig 4 8.1
1 966) 1 966)
H ousesteads b uilding X III c halet p hase ( Daniels H ousesteads b uilding X iV c halet, p hase I I ( Wilkes 1 961; D aniels a nd G illam ) G reat C hesters c halet b uilding ( Daniels 1 980A) H igh R ochester ' chalets' ( Daniels 1 980A)
4 5.A2
F ig 4 7.7 4 7.2
1 922A)
B inchester p raetorium p hase 6 C ( Ferris a nd J ones R 1 980) C hesterholm m id t hird-century b arracks i n t he p raetentura ( Bidwell 1 981)
F ig 4 5.A1
F ig 4 6.1
( Wheeler
1 969)
( Charlesworth
1 965)
( Hartley
1 960)
Y ork p ossible b arracks b y t he s outh-west d efences ( RCHM Y ork 1 962)
4 8.2
B rough-on-Noe b uilding i n t he p raetentura
4 8.3 4 8.4
( Jones G a nd W ild 1 968; J ones G a nd W ild 1 969B) R avenglass b arracks p hase 4 ( Potter 1 979A) B ainbridge l ate f ourth-century b uilding ( Hartley
1 960)
F ig 4 9.1
4 9.3A
B irdoswald b uilding n orth o f v ia p rincipalis p eriod I I ( Richmond a nd B irley 1 930) H ousesteads b uilding X V p eriod I II ( Leach a nd W ilkes 1 962) R ichborough s ite V II ( Johnson J 1 976A)
4 9.3B
R ichborough s ite I V
4 9.4A 4 9.4B 4 9.4C 4 9.4D
P ortchester P ortchester P ortchester P ortchester
4 9.2
F ig 5 0.1A 5 0.1B
( Johnson J 1 976A)
b uilding b uilding b uilding b uilding
R 1 R 4 R 2 R 6
( Cunliffe 1 975) ( Cunliffe 1 975) ( Cunliffe 1 975) ( Cunliffe 1 975)
B irdoswald b uilding n orth o f v ia p rincipalis p eriod I II ( Richmond a nd B irley 1 930)
5 0.2A
B irdoswald b uilding n orth o f v ia p rincipalis p eriod I V ( Richmond a nd B irley 1 930) C aernarvon s ite X X l ate f ourth c entury ( Wheeler 1 924)
5 0.28
C aernarvon s ite X IX l ate f ourth c entury
F ig 5 1.1A 5 1.1B
W allsend b uildings ( Daniels 1 980A)
( Wheeler
1 923)
i n n orth-west p raetentura
5 1.2
W allsend b uildings i n n orth-east p raetentura ( Daniels 1 980A) R ichborough c hurch a nd b aptistry ( Brown 1 971)
5 1.3
B ainbridge f ourth c entury s tructures o n t he s ite o f e arlier p rincipia;
1 -8 p its,
t he
9 l ime-kilns,
1 0 l ime m ixing t roughs, 1 1-12 p robable l arge b ases, 1 3 r ough p aving, 1 4-15 f oundation t renches o f t imber b uildings ( Hartley F ig 5 2.1 5 2.2
1 969)
P iercebridge c ourtyard b uilding C hester e lliptical b uilding
( Scott a nd L arge
( Nash-Williams
1 969)
1 978)
A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS
T his a t
work i s
l argely b ased o n r esearch w hich was
s ubmitted f or a P hD
t he U niversity o f N ewcastle u pon T yne i n N ovember
1 980 .
T he b ulk
o f t he material i n t his s tudy c ame f rom p ublished s ources t hough b y t he
k indness
D aniels,
p articularly o f Messrs.
J .P .
e xcavators;
G illam
s ome
a nd
R .
u npublished
Miket
t hrough
a n
e arlier
d raft
o f
a nd
m aterial
e xcavations has b een i ncluded .
P . Austen, a lso
f rom
o f
P .T.Bidwell, a n umber
r ecent
a nd n ot
C .M .
o f
o ther
s o
r ecent
D rs. B . D obson a nd K .T . G reene r ead t he
t ypescript
a nd
made
a n umber
o f
h elpful c omments .
M y e special
t hanks
g o
t o J ohn G illam f or a ll t he h elp h e h as g iven m e
o ver t he l ast f ive y ears . h ere were h is,
Many o f
t he m ore o riginal i deas e xpressed
t hough h e i s i n n o way r esponsible f or t he way I h ave
d eveloped o r a ltered
t hem .
L astly, I would l ike t o t hank m y t ypist, Mrs. J . S tartin, f or a ll h er h elp and f or t he p atience s he h as s hown i n t he c opying o f my o ften d ifficult
m anuscript .
D .A. W elsby A pril,
1 982
I NTRODUCTION
When C ollingwood wrote h is h istory o f R oman B ritain i n
1 924,
h istorical f ramework which h e s ketched was b ased mainly
t he
o n t he
l iterary a nd e pigraphic e vidence . T he a rchaeological evidence was r arely t aken i nto a ccount; i t c ertainly was n ot u sed t o m odify i nterpretations o f t he i sland's h istory d erived f rom t he l iterary s ources. A ccording t o C ollingwood,
t he l ate s econd c entury was marked b y a
d isastrous r ising o f t he p eoples s outh o f t he f rontier c oupled with i nvasion f rom b eyond ; d evastation s pread o ver m uch o f t he n orth a nd i ncluded Y ork . T his was d ated t o c irca A D 1 81 ( Dio) . R ecovery was s low; t he i nscriptions o f S everan g overnors f rom H adrian 's Wall a nd i ts hinterland marked t he r efurbishment o f t he n orthern d efences. F ollowing t he c ampaigns o f S everus , t here w as p eace f or 6 0 y ears . A r enewed d isaster i n t he n orth c irca A D 2 75 w as c losely f ollowed b y t he f irst S axon r aids i n A D 2 87 . C arausius r estored t he s ituation o n t he S axon S hore a nd i n t he n orth, where h is c ampaigns a gainst t he C aledones were c ontinued b y C onstantius . B y a bout A D 3 30, a lthough t he Wall f orts were s till h eld, t he milecastles were a bandoned ( evidence f rom t he e xcavations a t Milecastle 4 8 ) . B arbarian p ressure o n
t he
n orthern
f rontier
mounted
d uring
t he
f ourth
c entury
a nd
c ulminated i n t he ' barbarian c onspiracy' o f A D 3 67, ( Ammianus) which d id p ermanent d amage t o t he p rosperity o f t he d iocese . When t he u surper, Magnus Maximus, c rossed t he C hannel i n A D 3 83, h e s tripped B ritain o f t roops; t he W all was p robably a bandoned t hough a f ew f orts were s till h eld a s were t he t owns o f C arlisle a nd C orbridge. T he N otitia D ignitatum c ompiled i n t he A D 4 20s p ossibly r epresents t he s ituation i n B ritain f ollowing o n t he r e-organisation o f t he d efences o f t he d iocese b y S tilicho i n A D 3 95; n ot m entioned). T he
t roops
w ere
c oncentrated
i n t he
( the i tem p er l ineam v alli i s
a rea r ound Y ork a nd o n t he S axon
S hore; t he d efence o f t he west a nd t he n orth-west may h ave b een e ntrusted t o l oyal R omanised B ritons. With t he u surpation o f C onstantine I II i n A D 4 07, B ritain c eased t o b e g arrisoned b y R ome . T his
i nterpretation
was
a ltered
b y
t he
d iscovery
i n
i nscriptions a t B irdoswald, R IB 1 909 a nd 1 912. T he a ttested u nder S everus a nd C onstantius C hlorus were f elt
1 929
o f
t wo
r ebuildings t o r epresent
t he r econstruction o f t he s ite f ollowing i nvasion ; t he d escription o f b uildings f allen d own t hrough a ge b eing a e uphemism f or d estruction b y t he e nemy.
I n b oth c ases, t he i nvasion h ad t o immediately p recede
t he r ebuilding ,
h ence t he i nvasions o f A D
d isasters a ssociated w ith t o t hat 1 6 years l ater.
1 97 a nd 2 96 w ere b orn .
T he
t he i nvasion o f A D 1 81 were n ow a ttributed T he r emoval o f t roops b y A lbinus t o t he
C ontinent i n A D 1 97 a nd b y A llectus t o t he s outh o f B ritain i n A D 2 96 a ccounted f or t he b arbarians' wide-ranging d evastation i n t he n orth , t hat o f A D 2 96 p enetrating a s f ar s outh a s C hester . f ortresses, b oth a t Y ork a nd C hester , were d estroyed,
(M I
o f t he d efences b eing r efurbished i n t he e arly
c entury) .
f ourth
T he l egionary t he e vidence
B y t he t ime R ichmond wrote h is h istory i n 1 955 ,
t hese i deas h ad b ecome
t he e stablished d ogma, a nd t o many t hey s till r emain s o. F rere's B ritannia , f irst p ublished i n 1 967 , p reserves a ll o f R ichmond's ' main e vents' , t hough b y t hat d ate a rchaeological e vidence was b eginning t o c all i nto q uestion much o f t hird a nd f ourth c enturies .
t he military h istory o f Britain i n t he
N o f urther l iterary e vidence h as c ome t o l ight r elating t o t he h istory o f R oman B ritain s ince C ollingwood wrote .
T he e pigraphic e vidence i s
m ore e xtensive a nd e asily a vailable t hanks l argely t o C ollingwood h imself,
b ut
i t
d oes
h istorical n arrative . b uilding work r ecorded e xplanatory
t han m ost .
n ot
t ell
u s
much
f rom
which
t o
write
a n
R arely a re we g iven a ny e xplanation a s t o w hy e pigraphically t ook p lace ; R IB 1 912 i s m ore I t
i s e xtremely d ifficult,
i f n ot i mpossible
t o e quate a n h istorically a ttested e vent with a n a rchaeological l evel; r arely i s o ne a ble t o b e s ure t hat t wo a rchaeologically a ttested p henomena a t d ifferent s ites a re c ontemporary . We a re n ow i n ap osition t o d isprove o r a t l east c all i nto q uestion m uch o f t he a ccepted i nterpretation o f t he m ilitary h istory o f R oman B ritain i n i ts l ater p hases, b ut i t i s c onsiderably m ore d ifficult t o s ubstitute a nother i nterpretation i n i ts p lace . I n t his work n o a ttempt h as b een m ade t o r e-write t he m ilitary h istory o f B ritain i n t he t hird a nd f ourth c enturies . I n t heory e ach m ilitary i nstallation c ould have had a history u nique t o i tself t hough i n p ractice t his i s unlikely, a t l ast while e ach s ite r emained u nder military c ontrol . E ven s o , t o m ake wide h istorical g eneralisations i s n ot wise . W hat I h ave a ttempted t o d o i s t o a ssemble a ll t he a rchaeological e vidence p ertaining t o t he a rmy i n B ritain i n t he l ast t wo c enturies o f R oman r ule . T he material i s a rranged c hronologically a lthough i n many c ases a p articular e vent i s o nly d atable t o a v ery wide t ime s pan . For most s ites I have been f orced t o a ccept t he excavator's c hronology.
T his d oes n ot mean t hat I am, i n e ach c ase, c onfident
t hat a s ite h as b een c orrectly d ated .
2
C HAPTER 1 R OMAN F RONTIER D EVELOPMENT T he t hird c entury was a p eriod o f g reat c hange i n B ritain, a s i n t he r est o f t he R oman Empire, which a ffected most f acets o f R oman l ife. Much
o f
t he
c hange
was b rought a bout b y t he c onstant a nd s erious
b arbarian t hreat t o t he s afety o f t he Empire o n a lmost a ll i ts f rontiers. I n t he f irst a nd s econd c enturies, a nd i ndeed f or a f ew c enturies b efore t hat, R ome h ad g enerally b een i n c omplete c ommand o f t he s ituation o n h er f rontiers. T here were i nstances o f s erious i nvasion t hreatening t he e xistence o f t he Empire , b ut a fter t he w ars a gainst t he C imbri a nd T eutones t hese t hreats had l argely c eased t o e xist. I n t he l ate R epublic a nd e arly Empire t he g reatest d anger t o R ome w as c ivil war. C ivil war b rought a bout t he d ownfall o f t he r epublican s ystem o f g overnment . A ugustus a nd h is s uccessors were v ery much a ware o f t his a nd r ealised t he d angers o f i ts r eoccurrence . D uring t he t hird c entury , t here w as c hronic c ivil w ar a gain o ver a n e xtended p eriod w hich n ot o nly t hreatened t o d estroy t he R oman S tate , b ut a lso a llowed t he b arbarians m uch g reater c hances o f s uccess i n t heir a ssaults a gainst t he Empire . M uch
o f R ome's s uccess
i n b uilding u p h er Empire h ad b een d ue a s
t o t he l ack o f c ooperation b etween h er e nemies a s
m uch
t o h er undoubted
m ilitary p rowess . T he f utility o f i ndividual r esistence t o R ome was n ot l earnt q uickly b y t he b arbarians, b ut d uring t he f irst t wo c enturies owing t o t he c ontinued p resence o f R oman f orces i n t he f rontier p rovinces, t he t ribes b eyond b egan t o c ooperate i n t heir a ttacks o n t he E mpire . T heir e ffectiveness was d emonstrated i n t he w ars u nder Marcus A urelius w hen t hey p enetrated w ell i nto I taly . T he t hreat was a verted t hough o nly a fter m uch p rolonged f ighting .
I n t he
t hird a nd f ourth c enturies, s uch i nvasions b y i ncreasingly l arge t ribal g roups b ecame c ommonplace . T hese l arge-scale i nvasions c oupled with t he a lmost i ncessant c ivil wars o f t he p eriod f rom c irca A D 2 40-90 a lmost d estroyed t he Empire . When Augustus c ame t o p ower, t he Empire c onsisted o f a n umber o f p rovinces b ordering p art b ut b y no means t he whole o f t he Mediterranean c oastline . p articularly i n t he e ast o f
B etween a nd b eyond t hese p rovinces, t he E mpire , were s tates b ound t o R ome b y
t reaties o f f riendship a nd m utual h elp . T hese c lient k ingdoms a cted a s buffer s tates i n t he e vent o f i nvasion t owards R oman o ccupied t erritory, u ndertook r esponsibility f or i nternal s ecurity i n t he a reas u nder t heir c ontrol a nd p rovided t roops t o a ssist R ome i n h er wars. T he Roman p rovinces t hemselves d id n ot h ave m ilitary f rontiers a s s uch, a lthough f or a dministrative r easons p hysical f eatures were h eld t o
mark
R oman
t he b oundaries
f orces
which
o f R oman h eld t erritory,
h ad
b rought
a bout
t he
e .g .
t he R hine .
c onquest
o f
T he
a p rovince
r emained i n t hat p rovince u ntil s uch t ime a s t hey were r equired t o c ontinue t he a dvance . I n G aul l arge c oncentrations o f t roops were m aintained a t K öln a nd Mainz a nd i n S yria a t A ntioch . T roops w ere n ot d ispersed a long a f rontier l ine , b ut h eld a s m obile s trike f orces .
3
A ugustus c ontinued t he r epublican p olicy o f t erritorial e xpansion f or most o f h is r eign . H e a dvanced u p t o t he D anube a long i ts whole l ength a nd i nitiated t he c onquest o f G ermany e ast o f t he Rhine . E lsewhere h e l argely r etained t he c lient s tates . T owards t he e nd o f h is r eign t he p rolonged f ighting n eeded t o t erminate t he P annonian r evolt - t he e nd o f which was c losely f ollowed b y t he l oss o f t hree l egions i n G ermany - p ersuaded t he a geing e mperor t o c all a h alt. T iberius a s e mperor , o n t he a dvice o f a d isillusioned A ugustus , ( who h ad a dded m ore t erritory t o t he R oman Empire t han a nyone e lse) r efrained f rom f urther e xpansion . T his d id n ot, h owever , h erald t he e nd
o f
a n e xpansionist p olicy.
A s
l ate a s
t he
r eign o f
S everus,
s izeable t erritorial g ains w ere b eing m ade i n t he E ast,
i n A frica a nd
i n B ritain, t hough S everus' d eath .
c urtailed b y
i n
t he
l ast
c ase,
D uring t he f irst c entury A D t here i s ,
e xpansion was
h owever ,
a c hange i n a ttitude t o
c ontinued e xpansion d iscernible i n s ome p rovinces o f t he Empire . H itherto t he R omans h ad a ccepted n o b ounds t o t heir c onquest. A . B irley, w hen d iscussing A ugustus' ' foreign p olicy' c ould write: " It w ould n ot b e u nrealistic t o s ay t hat A ugustus h ad n o f rontier p olicy : h is l ong-term a im a t l east was t o d ispense w ith t he n ecessity f or a ny f rontiers a t a ll, t o r ule a n empire without f rontiers, a n i mperium s ine f ine" ( Birley A 1 974, 1 5). T he a rmy, w hose c hief f unction was c onquest, whether j ustifiable a s a ' pre-emptive s trike' o r b rought a bout b y n aked a ggression , t ended a s t he r ate o f e xpansion s lowed t o f ind i tself u nemployed . A t t he s ame t ime , a s t he a reas u nder R oman c ontrol were b rought within t he Empire's m ore r igid a dministrative s ystem , t he n eed f or a p recise d emarcation b etween R oman a nd n on-Roman t erritory emerged . T his r esulted i n t he f ormation o f f rontiers which t o b e e ffective h ad t o b e p oliced a nd i t was o nly t o b e e xpected t hat t he a rmy was g iven t his j ob ( Mann 1 974 B , 5 12) . Military u nits were s paced a long t hese f rontiers t o m ore e ffectively p erform t heir j ob a s f rontier p olice . I n t hose p rovinces b eyond w hich n o f urther a dvance o ccurred, i nertia s et i n . T he f rontiers which t hus d eveloped g enerally f ollowed a l ine w hich w as i deal f or a dministrative p urposes, b ut b y n o means i deal s trategically. T he f irst h int o f a n emperor a ccepting a l imit t o e xpansion i s s een u nder D omitian . H e c ontinued h is f ather's p olicy o f e xpansion a cross t he R hine i n U pper G ermany. O n t he c onclusion o f h is C hattan W ar ,
h owever,
a s ystem o f t owers w as
l aid o ut a long t he T aunus r idge; l ater f orts w ere a dded t o t he l ine . T his , strongly s uggests t hat D omitian d id n ot e nvisage f urther e xpansion
i n t hat
a rea .
B y e arly i n t he s econd c entury,
most o f t he c lient s tates h ad b een
t aken u nder d irect R oman c ontrol . T his g reatly i ncreased t he d emands m ade o n t he a rmy f or p olicing a nd d efending t he n ew p rovinces . T he R omans w herever p ossible , h owever , m aintained t reaties with t he t ribes b eyond h er f rontiers; t here i s c lear e pigraphic e vidence f or t his f rom Mauritania T ingitana
( Mann
1 974 ,
5 29) .
a ble t o i mpose h er o wn n ominees o n t he t hrone . t he
c ase i n A rmenia ,
b ut
h appened e lsewhere
I n
s ome
c ases
s he
was
T his was p articularly ( e .g . M ocsy
1 974 ,
5 29) .
T he f ormation o f r igid f rontiers was c arried much f urther b y l ater emperors, n otably H adrian . H is wall i n B ritain i s b y f ar t he most e laborate b ut i s b y n o m eans t he o nly s uch p hysical b arrier t o m ark t he l imit o f R oman t erritory, t hough n ot t he l imit o f Roman c ontrol a nd i nfluence . S uch b oundaries h ad n o s trategic a nd l ittle t actical
4
v alue;
t hey w ere u seful i n p roviding a r eadily v isible d emarcation i n
t he s ame way a s d id s uch n atural f eatures a s r ivers a nd m ountains . D uring t he s econd c entury a nd i n s ome c ases e arlier, m ost f orts a nd f ortresses were b uilt o r r ebuilt i n s tone a nd t he units within t hem t ended t o r emain s tatic f or l ong p eriods. O utside t he d efences v illages a nd t owns g rew u p p roviding f or t he s oldiers' n eeds a nd h ousing t heir u nofficial f amilies . A s t ime went o n t hese s ettlements p rovided a r eady s ource o f r ecruits, s on f ollowing f ather i nto t he l ocal u nit. T his d evelopment o f l ocal t ies o ver g enerations c ontributed t o a g eneral l ack o f m obility . a n e ssential f eature o f t he A ugustan a rmy .
a n umber o f M obility w as
A fter t he c ivil wars which e nded t he R epublic, A ugustus h ad g reatly r educed t he s ize o f t he a rmy, p artly o wing t o t he g reat c ost o f maintaining a l arge a rmy a nd p artly b ecause o f t he d anger o f h aving l arge c oncentrations o f t roops i n a ny o ne a rea ; t he t hreat o f c ivil war was a lways p resent. T he a rmy was p laced i n t he f rontier p rovinces o f t he Empire w ell a way f rom i ts p olitical c entre w here i t was hoped i t c ould n ot b e u sed f or p olitical e nds b y a ny e xcept t he e mperor h imself. Small s cale l ocal t rouble c ould b e e ffectively c ountered b y t he t roops o n t hat p articular s ector o f t he f rontier . R einforcement c ould o nly b e e ffected b y d rawing o n t roops f rom a nother s ector o f t he f rontier . T his s ystem w orked a s e ffectively a s c ould h ave been h oped while t here was o nly o ne t hreatened a rea a t at ime, t hough t he a rmy was o n o ccasion v ery h eavily c ommitted i n a r elatively s mall a rea . I n t he P annonian r evolt o f A D 6 -9 , when o ver a t hird o f t he
t otal R oman a rmy was
e ngaged i n t hat
r egion ,
t he
o ther
f rontiers
o f t he Empire m ust h ave b een s eriously w eakened . I n t he t hird c entury, with t he a rmy a lmost c onstantly f ighting t he b arbarians o n a n umber o f f ronts a nd o ften f ighting i n c ivil wars a s well, t he s ystem b roke d own . N o l onger was i t s afe t o r educe t he g arrison o f a ny p rovince t o a m arked d egree without l aying t hat p rovince o pen t o a ttack .
T he n eed o f
a l arge c entral r eserve b ecame
o f p aramount i mportance . B y t he e nd o f t hat c entury a f ield a rmy w as g radually c oming i nto e xistence . I t was o fficially r ecognised a s s uch p robably b y C onstantine . v ery l ow m obility e nvironment r educed
( Luttwak
1 976,
o f
T he v alue o f a c entral r eserve i n t he t he R oman Empire was c onsiderably
1 82-3).
T he
f ormation
o f
r egional
f ield
a rmies i n t he west i n t he l ater f ourth c entury p rovided a p artial s olution t o t his p roblem ( Mann 1 979B, 1 82). R einforcement o f a t hreatened o r i nvaded s ector o f t he f rontier c ould, i n t he t hird c entury, n o l onger b e g uaranteed . H ence , t he p rovincial a rmies w ere f orced t o t ry a nd d efend l arge a reas a gainst c ontinual h igh-intensity t hreats w ith a n i nsufficient n umber o f m en . T heir a ttempts t o d o s o a re r eflected i n t he n ew d esigns o f f orts a t
t his p eriod .
I n t he e arly Empire, f orts a nd f ortresses h ad b een p rovided with s light d efences . I t was n ever e nvisaged t hat t hey would h ave t o b e h eld i n t he f ace o f a d etermined e nemy a ttack . T hey d id p rovide t heir g arrison w ith a m easure o f s ecurity a gainst s urprise a ttack , b ut i t was n ever
i ntended t hat t he t roops w ould h ave t o f ight f rom b ehind
t hese d efences . R oman m ilitary s uperiority w as m ost e ffectively u sed i n t he o pen; R oman t roops were t rained a nd e quipped t o a ttack t he e nemy i n t he f ield . I n t he t hird c entury, i t was f elt n ecessary t o p rovide f orts with d efences t hat were s trong e nough t o withstand a
5
d etermined a ttack o r e ven a s iege . H eavily f ortified s trongholds were n eeded w here t he a rmy c ould r etire i n t he f ace o f a dversity a nd await r einforcements i n s afety. T hus o n t he C ontinent w e h ave a n u pdating o f f ort d efences, t he p rovision o f e xternal t owers , t hicker walls, a nd f ewer g ateways . T here was a lso t he c onstruction o f many n ew f orts, o ften well b ehind t he f rontier, a s i t w as n ow e xpected t hat t he e nemy would b e a ble t o p enetrate d eep b ehind t he f rontier l ine . T he c onquest o f B ritain,
b egun b y C laudius i n A D 4 3,
a fter a r apid
i nitial a dvance o ver t he whole o f t he l owland r egion, r an o ut o f impetus. T hereafter, f urther c onquest d epended o n t he a ttitude o f t he e mperor i n p ower a nd o n t he m ilitary s ituation i n t he E mpire a s a whole . B y t he mid A D 8 0s, t he R omans h ad a dvanced well i nto S cotland, b ypassing t he highland massif, t hey p enetrated u p t o t he Moray F irth . F rom a m ilitary p oint o f v iew, t he m ost e fficient way o f h olding B ritain was
t o
c onquer
t he whole o f
i t,
t hus
d ispensing w ith
t he n eed f or f rontiers. T his i s c learly w hat t he R omans i ntended, b ut i t was n ever t o b e a chieved . With t he r emoval o f a l egion b y D omitian t o f ight i n G ermany , m ost o f t he r ecently c onquered a reas o f S cotland b ecame u ntenable a nd h ad t o b e a bandoned ; R ome f ell b ack o n t he d efensive . B y c irca A D 1 05 , f ollowing p ressure f rom t he n orthern t ribes, t he a rmy was b ack o n t he T yne-Solway l ine . T he r oad ( built b y A gricola b etween C orbridge a nd C arlisle) a nd t he f orts o n i t b ecame t he n orthern l imit o f t he p rovince which w as f urther s trengthened b y t he a ddition o f m ore f orts . S pecial emphasis was b eing g iven t o t his l ine; i nstead o f a s imple n etwork o f r oads a nd f orts s pread o ver t he n early c onquered t erritory,
a r igid f rontier was
B y A D 1 22 Hadrian was p roviding, have b een i ntended a s
d eveloping .
i n t he f orm o f h is wall, w hat must
t he f inal s olution t o
t he f rontier p roblem .
C learly n o f urther a dvance c ould have b een e nvisaged, a t l east b y H adria 1 . H owever, 2 0 y ears l ater Hadrian's Wall was l argely a bandoned a nd a s imilar f rontier s ystem was b uilt b etween t he F orth a nd t he C lyde . P erhaps t his a dvance was o ccasioned m ore b y p olitical c onsiderations t han t he d esire t o a chieve a ny s trategic o bjectives ( Birley A 1 974 ,
1 7) .
b ecame t he f rontier t he e arly A D 1 60s.
I n
A D
1 58 ,
H adrian's W all was
b eing
r ebuilt
a nd
a gain o n t he a bandonment o f t he A ntonine W all i n T hereafter, e xcept f or a b rief period under
S everus, i t w as t o r emain t he l imit o f R oman t erritory . F or m ost o f t his p eriod, f orts were o ccupied f urther n orth a nd R oman c ontrol, p ossibly f or s ome o f t his t ime, e xtended a s f ar n orth a s t he Tay. C irca
AD 1 80 ,
a s a c onsequence o f a n i nvasion o f
t he p rovince r ecorded
b y D io, t he o utpost f orts a long Dere S treet t o t he n orth o f t he Wall m ay h ave b een a bandoned . H altonchesters a nd R udchester, t hought t o have b een d estroyed i n t his i nvasion, may have been r ebuilt immediately. C orbridge, a lso t hought t o h ave b een d amaged a t t he s ame t ime ,
m ay h ave l ain i n r uins u ntil t he r eign o f S everus .
I n t he l ater s econd c entury, m ost o f n orthern B ritain f rom t he Wall s outh t o B rough-on-Noe was c overed b y an etwork o f r oads a nd f orts i ncluding t he t wo l egionary f ortresses l ying w ell t o t he r ear o f t he f rontier a t Y ork a nd C hester . T his was t he a rmy w hich was d eemed n ecessary t o maintain s ecurity b eyond t he n orthern f rontier ( the l egion a t C hester will a lso h ave b een c oncerned w ith i nternal s ecurity i n Wales). Owing t o t he s hort l ength o f t he f rontier l ine, i t was mostly s tationed i n i ts h interland. B y t he e nd o f t he s econd c entury, Wales was o ccupied b y f ew t roops h oused i n widely-spaced
6
f orts
( Nash-Williams
1 969,
f ig.9).
I t
r emained
u nimportant
m ilitarily u ntil t he t hreat f rom s ea r aiders n ecessitated t he b uilding o f n ew i nstallations, k nown a t C aer G ybi a nd C ardiff . T hroughout t he s econd c entury t here was v irtually n o m ilitary p resence i n t he s outh a nd e ast o f B ritain e xcept f or t he n aval b ase a t D over ( Philp 1 981) a nd p erhaps n ear L ympne , a nd t he C ripplegate f ort 1 980, 8 3) a ll o f w hich h ad a s pecial f unction.
i n L ondon
( Marsden
T he d evelopment o f t he R oman f rontier i n N orthern B ritain i s p aralleled e lsewhere i n t he E mpire; b y t he s econd c entury t here was n o f rontier i n Wales. c areful
planning.
I t was n ot t he c ulmination o f many y ears o f The
R omans
were
s imply
f ormalising
t he
a rrangements t hat c ircumstances h ad f orced u pon t hem . F rontiers d eveloped a s a d irect r esponse t o t he t hreats p osed b y t he p eople b eyond t hem, h ence t he d iversity o f f rontier s ystems t o b e f ound i n t he Empire . T he a dvance t o t he F orth-Clyde l ine u nder Antoninus P ius a nd t he b uilding t here o f a nother ' Hadrian's Wall' s hould have i ncreased t he s ecurity o f t he f rontier, b ut t he n ew p olicy was n ot v igorously a pplied . C hanging c ircumstances l ate i n t he r eign o f P ius b rought a bout t he d ecision t o r eturn t o Hadrian's Wall . T his would n ever h ave happened i f t he major f actors g uiding R oman f rontier p olicy i n B ritain s trategic
h ad
b een
m ilitary.
a dvantages
o ver
T he
H adrian's
Antonine W all ,
n ot
Wall
had
l east
i ts
a n umber much
o f
r educed
l ength a nd i ts c loser c ontact with t he main t hreat t o t he f rontier p osed b y t he C aledones a nd i n t he l ater s econd c entury t he Maeatae . S everus,
l ike
s olution t o c onquest o f af ew y ears o f t he a rea
A gricola,
s eems
t o have
a pplied
a p urely
military
t he p roblem o f B ritain's d efence b y a gain a ttempting t otal t he i sland . O n h is d eath , t he p roject l apsed a nd w ithin t he f rontier a gain r ested o n t he T yne-Solway l ine , c ontrol f ar t o t he n orth b eing mantained b y t he o utpost f orts.
I n t he s hort t erm , t his r eorganisation o f t he f rontier was a s uccess b ut t he R omans were f orced t o maintain f or most o f t he t hird a nd f ourth c enturies a l arge t he a dvent o f
m ilitary p resence
i n t he n orth .
l ong-range s eaborne a ttack d id i t
c ease
O nly with
t o b e e ffective
-a t hreat a gainst w hich i t h ad n ot b een d esigned . A s imilar t hreat i n t he s outh a nd e ast o f B ritain n ecessitated t he b uilding o f a c hain o f s trongly-defended f orts . N o s uch a dditions w ere d eemed n ecessary i n t he n orth a nd t here i s l ittle e vidence f or s uch s ites i n t he west .
7
C HAPTER 2 T HE T HIRD C ENTURY T he s ituation i n B ritain i n t he t hird c entury was v ery d ifferent f rom t hat o f m ost o ther f rontier p rovinces o f t he Empire . F rom t he wars o f S everus u ntil v ery l ate i n t he c entury, t here s eems t o h ave b een n o t rouble i n t he n orth, t hough i n t he s outh a nd e ast t he p rovision o f d efences a gainst s ea r aiders - p ossibly b eginning i n t he e arlier t hird c entury - c ulminated i n t he S axon S hore d efences b uilt i n t he l ast q uarter o f t he c entury. I t may o nly h ave b een c irca A D 2 80 t hat S axon a nd F rankish p irates b ecame a s erious menace i n t he C hannel. A t t hat t ime t he g arum-making a nd f ish-salting ' factories' i n t he t erritory o f t he O sismii i n N orth-western G aul c eased p roduction . T his happened i n t he s pace o f av ery f ew y ears, p erhaps b eing c aused p artly b y t he d isruption o f s ea t ransport n ecessary f or t he e xport o f t hese p roducts ( Galliou 1 980, 3 99). T he p eaceful c ondition o f B ritain f or much o f t his p eriod i s r eflected i n i ts f ort d efences. O nly o n t he S axon S hore a re t here f orts e quipped l ike t hose o f s imilar d ate o n t he C ontinent. T he n orth a nd west o f B ritain i n t he t hird c entury s oon b ecame militarily u nimportant a reas. A t n o f ort o r f ortress i n t hese a reas was t here a ny u pdating o f t he d efences a t t his t ime. B y t he e nd o f t he c entury s ome o f t hese f orts s eem t o h ave b een p artly o r t otally a bandoned . E ven t he n ew f ort a t P iercebridge which was built i n t he l ater t hird c entury h as f ew o f t he f eatures p resent i n t he n ear-contemporary f orts o n t he S axon S hore a nd o n t he C ontinent. I n t he l ast d ecade o f t he s econd a nd e arly i n t he t hird c entuLies t here was much r ebuilding i n B ritish f orts. T he f irst S everan g overnor, V irius L upus, i s r ecorded e pigraphically i n t he P ennine f orts, a s i s V alerius P udens. A lfenus S enecio i s r ecorded o n t he Wall i tself.
S ome o f t he b uilding work g enerally a ssigned t o t he
g overnorships o f t hese m en m ay d ate t o t he t ime o f C aracalla f ollowing o n t he t ermination o f t he S cottish c ampaigns. F rom t hen u ntil t he e nd o f t he c entury t here i s n o h int o f t rouble i n t he n orth, t hough b uilding work i s a ttested f or much o f t his t ime . T rouble i n t he s outh a nd e ast i s f irst r ecorded i n t he h istorical s ources a t t he t ime o f
C arausius .
F orts i n t he T hird C entury A D A n umber o f
f orts,
-
P art
1
T he D efences
m ainly i n t he n orth o f B ritain , a re t hought t o h ave
had t heir d efences b uilt o r r epaired i n t he e arly t hird c entury . T his h as u sually b een a ssociated with t he k nown work a t s ome f orts u nder S everus, t hough t he e vidence f or t his d ate i s o ften s light o r n on-existent. A t R isingham, t he b uilding o f t he s outh g ate i s s ecurely d ated b y a n i nscription R IB 1 234 t o A D 2 05-8 . T his g ate i s o f
unusual
p lan
( fig
1 7 .5)
b eing
f lanked
b y
two
p rojecting
a nd
o riginally, n o d oubt, m atching p olygonal t owers ( Richmond 1 936 , 1 90 ) . O n p urely t ypological g rounds, t hese would n ormally h ave b een t hought o f a s b eing much l ater i n d ate. I n B ritain, s uch p olygonal t owers a re o nly f ound i n a p urely m ilitary c ontext o n t he s outh-west w all a t Y ork a nd a t C ardiff; i n b oth c ases t hese w ould s eem t o d ate t o t he l ate t hird o r f ourth c enturies . P rojecting g ate-towers a re , h owever,
8
k nown i n B ritain a t a m uch e arlier d ate . T he s emi-circular f ronted g ate-towers a t C astell C oh en ( fig 1 7 .3 ) d ate t o t he A ntonine p eriod ( Alcock 1 964 , 7 6) . T he e arly s econd c entury c lassis B ritannica f ort a t D over h ad p rojecting Irshaped g ate-towers ( fig .21 .5) . I t was a lso n ot p rovided w ith a r ampart b ank a nd i ts b arrack-like b uildings w ere b uilt a lmost u p t o t he wall ( Philp 1 981) . P rojecting r ectangular g atet owers a re k nown a t C aerleon a nd B recon G aer d ating t o t he e arly s econd c entury a nd a t S outh S hields o f H adrianic d ate ( fig 1 7 .1) . I t h as b een s uggested t hat t he o ne g ate-tower e xcavated a t C aerleon m ay b e o f S everan d ate . T . B erchert ( Bonn . J ahr . C LXXI) p robably w rongly c oncluded t hat r ectangular g ate-towers o nly d ate t o t he p eriod c irca A D 1 61-235 . N ash-Williams t hought t he t ower c ontemporary w ith t he wall ( Boon 1 972 , f n .118) . A ttempts t o d ate d efences b y t ypological c onsiderations a re o ften v ery s uspect, e specially when o nly o ne o r t wo s upposed l ate f eatures a re p resent a t a f ort. B irley d ated h is r ectangular p rojecting g ate-towers a t C hesterholm ( fig 1 7 .6A ) t o t he e arly f ourth c entury ( Birley E 1 931, 1 99 ) . T he H adrianic w est g ate a t S outh S hields was d ated o n a nalogy t o t he s ame p eriod ( Richmond 1 934, 8 7). T he S everan wall a t R isingham was o f e xceptionally f ine masonry; i t was 1 .75m t hick a nd p rovided with a c ontemporary c lay b ank o f a t l east 7 .62m w ide . T he
o nly
o ther
a t C arpow a v ery
( fig
s hort
s ecurely-dated
f ort
d efences
o f
t his
p eriod
a re
t hose
1 .1) which s eems t o h ave b een a S everan f oundation w ith l ife .
within t he r ampart .
T he d efences
e nclose a n a rea o f
c irca
9 .6 ha
T hey c onsist o n t he n orth s ide o f a c lay r ampart
9 .1m t hick s et o n a t imber f rame ; t he e ast r ampart was 6 .1m t hick o f t urf, s et o n a c lay b ase with t wo V -shaped d itches b eyond . T he w est r ampart h ad b een r evetted a t t he f ront w ith c lay a nd s tone . A ll t he g ates i n t heir f inal f orm were o f s tone , n one h ad s tone g uardchambers, t hough a t t he n rth g ate t here may have b een t imber o nes. T he e ast g ate had b een p receded b y a t imber s tructure o n t he s ame s ite . I t w as d ouble-portalled , t he p ortals b eing o f d ifferent w idths, 1 .22 a nd 3 .35m wide .
T he s outh g ate was
s imilar a nd was
a lso o f
a symmetrical
p lan . T he n orth g ate h ad t he u nusual f orm o f a l etter E a nd i ts g ate p assages s eem t o have b een b locked . A ll t he g ates a re s et t owards t he c entre o f t heir w alls ( Birley A 1 967) . O ther f orts whose d efences a re t hought t o s how work o f
t he S everan
p eriod a re A mbleside , B ewcastle , C hester , D oncaster , H igh R ochester , I lkley, L ow B urrow B ridge , Malton , Manchester , S outh S hields a nd Y ork . T he n ew w all a t H igh R ochester , w hich c losely f ollowed t he l ine o f t he A ntonine s tone w all , w as 1 .35m t hick . T here was n o i ndication o f why t his n ew f ort w all was n eeded ( Richmond 1 936) . A t Y ork t here i s s ome e vidence t o s uggest t hat t he e arlier wall h ad e ither c ollapsed o r b ecome u nstable o wing t o s ubsidence a nd t his n ecessitated t he wall 's r ebuilding ( Frere 1 961). A s a t H igh R ochester, t here was a lso e vidence f or t he a ngle-tower h aving b een r eplaced ( RCHM Y ork 1 ,31). M iller b elieved t hat t his t ower , w hich h ad b een f illed w ith c lay , w as s o s trengthened i n o rder t o a ct a s a n a rtillery emplacement ( Miller 1 928,
6 8).
C hester was a pparently r eoccupied i n s trength c irca A D
1 60 and h ad i ts d efences e xtensively r emodelled a round A D 2 00 . A n umber o f e xcavations h ave s hown t hat t he r ampart b ank was h eightened which i n s everal c ases n ecessitated t he d emolition o f r ampart b uildings a nd t he a bandonment o f o vens. An e arly s econd c entury s tone i nterval-tower f ound a t A bbey G reen would s eem t o h ave b een e xtensively
r epaired o r
t otally
r ebuilt
9
( Strickland
1 981,
4 22-3) .
The
single-portal
g uardchambers
g ateway
c ontemporary
a t with
I lkley t he
h ad
1 .52m
i nternal t hick
r ectangular
d efensive
wall.
T here m ay h ave b een a t ower i n t he n orth-west a ngle , r emains o f w hich h ave b een r emoved b y l ater d isturbance ( Hartley 1 966). T he c ontemporary n orth-east g ate a t Malton a lso h ad a s ingle p ortal - i t was s imply a r econstruction o f t he p revious g ate o n t he s ite a nd , l ike i ts p redecessor, i t h ad n o g uardchambers ( Corder 1 930, 4 6). T he S everan wall a t L ow B urrow B ridge s at o n t he r emains o f t he e arlier s ubsided wall ( Hildyard a nd G illam 1 951, 4 5 ) . T he e xcavator o f t he n orth g ate a t Manchester b elieved t hat t he m uch d isturbed r emains w ere o f a d ouble-portalled g ate without g uardchambers. He d ated i t o n a nalogy with t he west g ate a t B ewcastle ( Petch J . 1 956). T he s imilar d ouble-portalled s outh-east , s outh-west a nd n orth-east without g uardchambers a t H ardknot a re o f H adrianic d ate .
g ates A t
Manchester i n t he t hird c entury a l arge o uter d itch was d ug a cross t he r oad f rom t he n orth g ate, a pparently c losing t he g ate p ermanently. N o t race o f a b ridge was f ound o ver t his d itch which r emained o pen i nto t he f ourth c entury ( Holdsworth 1 981) .
T he p resent f ort a t B ewcastle was t hought t o d ate f rom t his t ime . T he d efences c onsist o f a 1 .52m t hick wall with a r ampart b ank . I t i s p ossible, c ontrary t o what t he e xcavators o f 1 937 t hought, t hat t he d efences c ould b e o f H adrianic d ate . A ll t he f orts o n t he Wall a nd a ssociated with i t t o t he e ast o f t he R ed R ock f ault w ere d efended b y s tone walls ( the d efences o f N ewcastle h ave n ot y et b een i dentified) . A ll t hose t o t he west o f i t s eem t o h ave b een o riginally o f t urf . O ne would expect t hat B ewcastle, l ying t o t he e ast o f t he f ault, would h ave b een d efended i n s tone f rom t he H adrianic p eriod .
O n t he s ite o f
t he p orta d ecumana n o t race o f a t imber g ate was f ound n or was a ny t race o f d efences e arlier t han t he s tone wall n oted i n t he s ection t hrough t he s outh-west d efences . T he b uilding t o t he west o f t he v ia q uintana, t hought b y t he e xcavators t o b e o f S everan d ate, e xtends over t he l ine o f t he v ia d ecumana l eading t o t he s tone g ates s outhwest p ortal, s uggesting t hat b y t his d ate o ne p ortal h ad b een b locked ( Austen 1 978). T ypologically, t he d efences c ould a s e asily b e H adrianic a s S everan . I f t he e arly t urf d efences a re s till t o b e f ound ,
t he s tone d efences c ould d ate t o o ne o f
t he t wo p eriods o f T urf
Wall r eplacement b y s tone a nd t o t he r eplacement o f t urf f orts o n t he western s ector o f t he Wall i n s tone . Mr . P . A usten n ow b elieves t he s tone d efences t o b e o f s econd c entury d ate, b ut t o r epresent t he s econd p hase o f t he d efences. I n h is r ecent e xcavations h e f ound r emains o f a t urf r ampart u nderlying t he s tone r evetment w hich p resumably d ates t o t he A D 1 20s. H e s uggests t hat t he f ort l ike B irrens was g iven t urf d efences b ecause t he o utposts d ate t o b efore t he ' fort d ecision' which r esulted i n t he p rovision o f f orts o n t he Wall, s ome b eing g iven s tone d efences f rom t he s tart. T he p orta d ecumana a nd p ossibly t he o ther g ates were b uilt i n s tone f rom t he f irst . I t was n ot a g eographical f actor t hat d etermined t he c ontrast b etween B ewcastle a nd B irdoswald , b ut a c hronological o ne . A t Ambleside , t he n orth-east a ngle-tower m ust h ave b een o ut o f u se b y t he e nd o f p eriod I , d ated b y t he e xcavators t o A D 1 80 ( Collingwood 1 915, 1 5); i ts s outh wall was i n r uins b y t his t ime ( Haverfield, C ollingwood a nd F reeston 1 914, 4 44). P robably c onnected with t he c ampaigns o f S everus i n t he n orth, t he f ort a t S outh S hields was e xtended i n l ength t owards t he s outh-east . T he n ew s ection o f f ort
1 0
w all w as p rovided w ith a ngle-towers a nd t he n ew g ate w ould s eem t o b e o f t he s ame p lan a s t he o thers o n t he c ircuit ( pers. c omm . Mr . R . M iket). B uilding w ork o n a g ate a t C hesterholm i s r ecorded e pigraphically a nd d ated t o A D 2 23 .
I t r ecords
t hat a g ate a nd i ts t owers w ere r estored
f rom t he f oundations b y t he c ohors I V G allorum ( RIB 1 706). T his i nscription may d ate t he b uilding o f t he p eriod I I s tone f ort h ere ( see a ppendix 1 ). E . B irley d ated t he s econd s tone p hase i n t he d efences a nd i nternal b uildings t o t he C onstantian r estoration t o c omply with t he W all p eriods, b ut a lso o n a ccount o f t he p oor s tyle o f c onstruction o f t his p eriod . T he p oor c onstruction a nd s hoddy l aying o ut o f t he w est g ate-towers c ould e asily b e a ccounted f or b y t he f act t hat t he work was c arried o ut b y a uxiliary l abour a s t he i nscription c learly s tates, ( cf s uggested a uxiliary b uilding work o f A ntonine d ate a t Watercrook) ( Potter 1 979A , 1 57) . A s n oted a bove , t here i s n o t ypological r eason f or d ating t he n orth a nd w est g ates t o t he f ourth c entury . Mr . G illam s uggests t hat t he n orth-west a ngle-tower w hich B irley t hought t o b e a n a rtillery p latform d ue t o i ts l ack o f b onding i nto t he f ort wall, was n ot c ontemporary with t he p resent wall a nd t hat t he p eriod I I s tone wall d id n ot have a n a ngle-tower h ere . T here i s n o e vidence f or a t ower i n t he s outh-east a ngle . T he t ower v isible o n t he e ast wall c lose t o t he a ngle may b e a l ater a ddition, a s i s t he o ne t hat has r ecently b een d iscovered i n t he n orth-east a ngle . A s c onsolidated , t he n orth-west a ngle-tower f oundations a re a t a much h igher l evel t han t hose o f t he period I I s tone wall . May n ot a ll t hese a ngle-towers b e l ater a dditions t o t he t hird c entury f ort which o riginally h ad n o a ngle-towers whatever? T he l atrine b uilding i n t he n orth-east a ngle , e xcavated b y R . B irley, o ccupies t he p osition o f a nd i s o f a s ize b efitting a n a ngle-tower . I t c ould h ave f unctioned b oth a s a l atrine a nd a t ower, a lthuugh t his would b e u nusual ( see B idwell 1 981, f ig 5 ). T he c onstruction o f a t ower a l ittle t o t he n orth-west o f t he l atrine s uggests t hat i f t he l atrine b uilding a lso f unctioned a s at ower, i t went o ut o f u se i n t he l ater R oman p eriod . T he b ack wall o f t he l atrine b uilding was m uch t hinner t han t he s ide walls, p erhaps s uggesting t hat t he s tructure d id n ot s upport a t ower . B oth n orth a nd west g ates h ave p rojecting g atet owers o f r ectangular p lan, t hose o f t he west g ate b eing l onger a nd t hinner t han t hose o f t he n orth g ate . T he west g ate's t owers a re v ery a symmetrical ; t he c arriageway i s 4 5cm wider a t i ts w est e nd ( fig 1 7 .6B). T he s outh g ate ( fig 1 7 .6A) was s ingle p ortal without g ua.r dchambers ( Birley 1 970) . T he f ort wall v aries i n t hickness f rom 9 1cm t o r ather l ess t han 2 .44m ( Birley 1 931). E xcavation o f t he v isible n orthern d efences c entury ( Bidwell 1 981) .
s uggest
t hat
t hey d ate
t o
t he e arlier
t hird
R IB 1 280 f rom H igh R ochester r ecords t he b uilding o f ab allistarium i n A D 2 20 , R IB 1 281 r ecords t he r estoration f rom g round l evel o f a nother u nder S everus A lexander . I n t he e xcavations o f 1 935, s uch a s tructure was t hought t o h ave b een f ound . I t c onsisted o f a p latform o f l arge r ough s tones s et i n a v ery s ticky c lay. T he s tructure o verlay s ome S everan m aterial a nd was d ated t o a l ate S everan p hase ( Richmond 1 936, 1 81). T his p latform would p resumably h ave b een s ufficiently r esilient t o w ithstand t he f iring o f a rtillery f rom i t . Ammianus, writing o f a n o nager o r s corpion, r ecords " placed o n ah eap o f t urf o r ap ile o f s un-dried b ricks; m achine o f
t his k ind ,
i f p laced u pon a s tone w all ,
1 1
t hat i t was f or a heavy
s hatters e verything
b eneath i t b y XXIII, 4 ,5).
i ts
v iolent
c oncussion
r ather
t han b y
i ts
weight"
( A .M .
T he p eriod I I s tone w all a t L anchester was d ated b y t he e xcavator t o t he r eign o f G ordian I II ( Steer 1 939 , 1 14) u nder w hom e xtensive w ork i n t he p rincipia i s r ecorded e pigraphically C RIB 1 092). T he l ong p eriod o f a bandonment s uggested b y S teer , p resumably f rom c irca A D 1 80 o r A D 1 97 t o c irca A D 2 40, has b een d oubted b y s ome ( Dobson 1 968-70, 3 5) . Mr . G illam i s i nclined t o a ccept S teer's d ating , b ut p oints o ut t hat t here d oes a ppear t o b e ac ontradiction b etween t he e pigraphic a nd s tructural e vidence o n t he o ne h and, a nd t he p ottery a nd c oin e vidence o n t he o ther. H e i s p repared t o a ccept t hat t he e arly t o m id-third c entury p ottery g roups a t L anchester c ontain a n u nually h igh p ercentage o f s urvivals . T he ' Gordianic' f ort w all i s 2 .44m t hick a t t he b ase, b ut i s s tepped i nternally t o a width o f a round 9 1cm a t t he g reatest s urviving h eight o f 3 .66m . T he s tepping o f t he i nner f ace o f t he f ort wall t o s uch a n e xtent i s m atched a t B urgh C astle , C ardiff a nd p ossibly a t B inchester. T he t hird-century wall a t L anchester o verlies i ts A ntonine p redecessor w hich was 2 .62m t hick a t t he b ase . T his i s very t hick f or a s econd-century f ort wall; walls o f t his t hickness a re g enerally f ound t o b e o f l ater d ate . T he c ontemporary d efences a t N ewstead were a lso m assive a nd i ncluded a f ort w all 2 .31m t hick ( Curle 1 911, 3 3) . T he p resumably l ater s econd-century d efences a t D rumbrugh were 2 .59m t hick, without a n a ssociated r ampart b ank ( Haverfield 1 899, pl .II). A t t he c lassis B ritannica f ort a t D over, which a lso h ad n o r ampart b ank, t he f ort wall was s till o nly 1 .2m t hick ( Philp 1 981, 2 0). I t s eems u nlikely t hat t here i s a ny c orrelation b etween t he t hickness o f t he d efensive wall a nd i ts h eight . A t D rumbrugh t he f ort wall would h ave b een t he s ame h eight a s H adrian 's
W all
a gainst
which
i t a butts .
T his h as b een e stimated
a t c irca 4 .5m h igh ( Daniels 1 978A , 2 0) . W hen t he p eriod I I s tone w all was b uilt , t he e arlier r ampart a t L anchester h ad b een l argely r emoved . O n t he r emnants o f t his e arly r ampart was o ccupation material 1 3cm t hick ( Steer 1 938) . T his, t ogether w ith t he f act t hat t he i nner f ace o f t he p eriod I I wall was o f well-dressed a shlars ( unlike t he p eriod I w all), s uggests t hat a t l east o n t his s ector o f t he c urtain , t he w all s tood f or s ome t ime without a r ampart b ank . When t he r ampart was a dded i t s tood Y ork . p eriod
1 .86m h igh a nd s eemed t o h ave b een c obbled o n t op a s a t
A c ontemporary i nternal
t ower s tood o n t he f oundations
o f
i ts
I p redecessor .
T he d ate o f t he e arlier t hird-century d efences o n t he S axon S hore i s u nclear. O n t he s trength o f a f ragmentary g overnor's n ame o n a n i nscription f rom Reculver, Richmond a rgued t hat t he f ort's c onstruction d ates t o c irca A D 2 10-20 ( Richmond 1 961, 2 25) . A nother c onsul's n ame
i n t he f asti c ould r epresent a g overnor c irca A D 2 25-30 .
T here i s, h owever, n o r eason why e ither o f t hese men n eed h ave b een g overnors o f B ritannia S uperior , a nd i t i s p robable t hat n either w as . O nly
c onsulares
c entury n o
o rdinarii a re r ecorded i n
t he f asti ,yet
i n t he t hird
g overnor o f B ritannia S uperior i s k nown t o h ave b een a
c onsul o rdinarius . B ritain was b ecoming a b ackwater . T he i nscription c ould d ate t o a ny t ime i n t he t hird c entury a fter t he r eign o f S everus, o r l ess p robably i n t he l ate s econd c entury M ann 1 977, 1 5; c f B irley A 1 981, 1 73-6) . T he a rchaeological e vidence f rom R eculver was t hought i n 1 959 t o s uggest a d ate o f c irca A D 2 00-225 f or t he f ort's c onstruction ( Philp 1 959, 1 05). T he c oin l ist , p ublished i n 1 936 f rom B rancaster , c ould s uggest a l ater t hird-century d ate ( St .
1 2
J oseph
1 936,
4 51) .
c ontemporary; p robably a lso
I t
i s h ighly
l ikely
C aister-by-Yarmouth, o f
t he s ame d ate .
t hat b oth s ites
i f
i t
i s
I t s eems
a re s trictly
a military
s ite,
i s
c lear t hat b y t he t ime
t hese f orts were b uilt, t he s econd-century f ort o f t he c lassis B ritannica a t D over h ad b een a bandoned ( Philp 1 977, 2 0) . T he l atest r ecord o f t he c lassis B ritannica i s a d edication s et u p a t A rles b y i ts c ommander u nder P hilip . C leere s uggests t hat b y t he m id-third c entury t his f leet a nd t he c lassis G ermanica h ad b een d isbanded o r a t l east B oth
n o
l onger e xisted u nder
R eculver
( fig
2 .1)
t heir p revious n ames
a nd B rancaster
( fig
1 .2)
( Cleere h ave
1 977 ,
1 9 ).
b asically
a
s quare p lan - t hough Reculver may h ave b een s lightly t rapezoidal ( Jessup 1 936, 1 89) - with p ortae principales i n t he c entre o f t heir r espective walls ( this was a f eature o f C laudian V alkenburg, T rajanic G ellygaer , H adrianic H ardknot, e tc .) . T he p orta p rincipalis d extra a t R eculver ( fig 1 7 .7), l ike t he p orta d ecumana, i s s ingle p ortal w ith o nly o ne i nternal g uardchamber C aerhun o f A ntonine d ate) . T wo o f
( cf t he west a nd s outh g ates a t t he g ates a t l east a t B rancaster m ay
h ave h ad p artly p rojecting g uardchambers, t hough t he e vidence i s v ery s light . T he wall h ere was c irca 2 .74m wide with a r ampart 6 .1m w ide b ehind .
T he s ingle d itch, 1 7 .72m wide b y 2 .44m d eep, was s eparated
f rom t he w all b y a 1 2 .2m b erm . T he 2 .44m t hick wall a t R eculver a lso h ad a c ontemporary r ampart b ank a nd was f ronted b y t wo d itches. A n ormal i nternal t urret w as f ound i n t he n orth-west a ngle a t B rancaster ( St. J oseph 1 936, 4 48). T he o nly a ngle t o b e e xamined a t R eculver, t he s outh-west, s howed n o e vidence f or a n i nternal r ectangular t urret . I nstead, a t hickening o f t he wall was f ound . T his mass o f l arge f lints a nd r ags t one was 1 .53m wide a nd s urvived t o a height o f 9 6cm. I t f ollowed t he i nner f ace o f t he f ort wall f or 1 .16m b efore i t a nd t he wall were r obbed o ut ( fig 2 2.2). P hilp s uggests t hat i ts width m ay h ave i ncreased a s t he f ort wall c urved f urther . A lthough i t i s n ot b onded with t he f ort wall, t he e xcavator t hought i t p robably c ontemporary with i t.
H e s uggests
t hat
i t
i s
more
l ikely
t o b e
s tructural t han t he b ase o f a n a ngle-tower o r b allistarium . T he s teepness o f t he h ill b ehind t he wall a t t his p oint c ould e xplain i ts p resence ( Philp 1 960 , 1 83) . I t i s, h owever , l ikely t hat t here w as a n a ngle-tower here . I n t he t hree a ngles which a re p reserved a t t he f ort o f G heriat e l-Garbia i n L ibya , t he f ort w all which i s a bout 2 .3m t hick i s s imilarly t hickened i nternally b y a s olid mass o f masonry c irca 1 .7m t hick which e xtends t he f ull l ength o f t he c urved a ngle ( fig .22.1). A t t his f ort t he s olid b ase t hus f ormed e xtended u p t o t he ' height o f t he p arapet w alk a nd s upported a n i nternal t ower . A t t he n orth a ngle t he o uter w all o f s uch a t ower w ith t wo r ound-headed windows s till s urvives ( Goodchild 1 976, p l. 2 9). I t i s o f i nterest t o n ote t hat
t he f ort a t G heriat d ates t o t he r eign o f S everus .
R eculver a nd B rancaster a re o f
B oth
l arger s ize t han was n ormal i n t he
s econd c entury , R eculver b eing c irca 3 .2 h a, B rancaster t heir k nown g arrisons w ere o nly o f q uingenary s trength .
2 .5 h a ,
t hough
T he p lan o f t he d efences a t C aister-by-Yarmouth has much i n c ommon with t he t wo a bove f orts. T he t rapezoidal a rea o f 3 .6-4 .0 h a ( fig 9 .2) i s e nclosed b y as trong wall 3 m t hick .
T he s outh g ate h as two
i nternal g uardchambers; o nly o ne o ther g ate i s p ostulated - t hat o n t he west . T he s outh-east a ngle c ontained a n i nternal t ower b ut t he n orth-east d id n ot. T here a re t wo a ssociated d itches, t hough o ne c ould b e o f l ater d ate . 2 50
t han A D
2 00
( Ellison
T he e xcavator d ated t he d efences n earer A D 1 966,
1 3
5 9).
Whether
t his
s ite
i s
r eally
military o r n ot i s u nclear . T here was c ertainly o ccupation o n t he s ite i n t he s econd a nd e arly t hird c enturies which was p resumably c ivilian . S uch c ivilian o ccupation i s a lso f ound a t o ther S axon S hore f orts: f or e xample, B rancaster, Walton C astle, B urgh C astle, B radwell, R eculver, R ichborough a nd D over . H owever, a t C aister-byY armouth , t here i s e vidence f or e arlier d efences . A d itch d ating t o c irca A D 1 85-210 h as b een f ound b ut i t was t hought t hat i t m ay n ot h ave b een c ompleted a nd n o s ign o f a n a ssociated r ampart w as n oted . I t t o
i s p ossible t hat a c ommunity s ufficiently i mportant a nd p rosperous c onsider d efending i tself i n t he l ate s econd c entury m ay h ave h ad
t he i nitiative t o p rovide n ew d efences i n t he m ore h azardous t imes o f t he earlier t hird c entury. T hat t he d efences bore a c lose r esemblance t o t he u ndoubted m ilitary s ites o f B rancaster a nd R eculver ,
b uilt t o m eet t he s ame t hreat ,
w as n ow m ilitary .
d oes n ot p rove
t hat
t he s ite
N o t race o f m ilitary b uildings w ithin i t h ave b een
n oted . T he l ater p rovision o f a f ort a t n earby B urgh C astle i s d ifficult t o e xplain i f C aister w as a m ilitary s ite . T he p resence o f o nly t wo g ateways i n a djacent walls i s e ven a t t his p eriod d istinctly u nusual i n a military c ontext. F ourth-century o ccupation s eems t otally
c ivilian i n
c haracter .
I t h as b een s uggested t hat i n t he e arlier t hird c entury m any o f t he t owns o n t he s outh a nd e ast c oasts may have h ad a m ilitary f unction a nd b een c onnected with t he d efence o f what l ater b ecame t he S axon S hore ( Wacher 1 975B, 5 1; J ohnson J 1 980A , 7 6). T he f ortlet a t R ichborough ( fig 1 4 .1) had a s hort l ife i n t he l ater t hird c entury t he e xcavator d ated i t t o p ossibly a fter r ather t han b efore A D 2 50 ( Bushe-Fox 1 928, 5 ) . I t w as p resumably d emolished o n t he d ecision t o b uild t he s tone f ort i n t he l ater t hird c entury , n ow g enerally d ated t o t he r eign o f P robus. T he f ortlet c onsisted o f t hree d itches e nclosing a r ectangular a rea o f c irca 0 .72 h a, ( most o f t he e astern s ide has b een e roded away) i n t he c entre o f which i s t he f lundation f or t he m onument , p erhaps a q uadrifons a rch . I t i s p resumed t hat t he monument was u sed a s a l ook-out t ower. W ithin t he d itches was a n e arth m ound a t l east 1 0 .93m wide, g iving a n i nternal a rea o f c irca 0 .42 h a e ntered b y a s ix-post t imber g ateway i n t he w estern d efences . T he f ortlet was c redited w ith a s hort l ife b ecause o f t he p resence o f l ittle s ilt i n t he d itches . I n t he i nner d itch t he e xcavators were p uzzled b y t he s light l edge o r o ffset n ear t he b ottom o f t he i nner s lope .
I t
was
i nterpreted
a s
a t rench
t o
t ake a r ow o f p ointed
s takes, a lthough i t d id n ot o ccur i n a ll s ections o f t he d itch . I n s ome -p laces where i t d id , t here w ere n o t races o f p ost-holes ( BusheF ox 1 928, 1 9). I t i s c lear, a s c an b e s een f rom t he s ections i n t he s econd r eport p l X LVI n o 1 4, 1 5 a nd 1 6 a nd i n t he t hird r eport p l X LVIII n o 1 9, 2 0 a nd 2 1, t hat t he d itch has b een r ecut a nd t hat t he l edge n oted a bove i s t he b ottom o f t he f irst p hase d itch ( Robinson 1 970, 6 0-1). T his e xplanation h ad b een o ffered b y t he e xcavator i n t he
f ourth
r eport
( Bushe-Fox
1 932,
6 1) .
T here i s n o e vidence o f r ecutting i n t he o uter t wo d itches .
I t i s
p ossible t hat t hese m ay b e o f l ater d ate a nd i t m ay b e s ignificant t hat t he i nner d itch has s quare t erminals a t t he west g ate c auseway while t he o uter t wo h ave r ounded t erminals . T he c outerscarp m ound b eyond t he o uter 1 932,
4 3);
a nd p erhaps d ate
o f
t he
d itch
c ontained a c oin o f C laudius
p resumably t he
m iddle
f ortlet's
I I
( Bushe-Fox
t his m aterial will h ave c ome f rom t he o uter
d itch .
A t erminus p ost
c onstruction was
1 4
q uem
p rovided b y
f or
t he
i nitial
t hree c oins o f
H adrian , A ntoninus P ius a nd a n i ndeterminate r adiate o f c irca A D 2 60 s ealed i n t he d enuded r emains o f t he f ortlet's c lay b ank ( Cunliffe 1 968, 2 0). T he f ort a t P iercebridge ( fig 2 .2) i s n ow d ated c loser t o A D 2 60 t han AD 3 00. I t s hares a number o f f eatures with Reculver and B rancas t er. T he g ates i n t he l ong s ides o f t his r ectangular f ort a re s et mid way a long t hem; b oth a re p rovided with i nternal g uardchambers f lanking t he c arriageway, t he e ast g ate b eing d ouble p ortalled a nd t he west s ingle ( fig 1 8.1). T he g uardchambers a t t he w est g ate c irca 2 .44m s quare were a ccommodated i n a t hickening o f t he f ort wall ( Harper 1 964, 3 35). T he f ort wall was c irca 3 .05m t hick a nd w as p rovided w ith a r ampart . A t b oth t he n orth-east a nd s outhwest angles t here was n o e vidence f or t he p resence o f a ngle-towers. O ne
c ould
n ot
h ave e xisted a t
t he n orth-east a ngle within w hich
i s
a
l atrine b uilding ( Richardson a nd K eeney 1 934-6) . W ithin t he s outhw est a ngle , n o t race o f t he r ampart b acking was n oted ( Keeney 1 939-43, 4 8-50). I t i s u nlikely t hat t his s pace was o ccupied b y a t imber a ngle-tower - t he e xcavator e nvisaged s ome means o f a ccess t o t he p arapet walk h ere. O n t his s ection o f t he d efences t here were two d itches with t he p ossibility o f a t hird, t he f irst b eing s eparated f rom t he f ort wall b y a b erm 3 .66m wide . w ide b y 1 .6m d eep .
B oth d itches were 7 .32m
D uring t he r eign o f P robus, t he d ecision s eems t o h ave b een t aken t o g reatly
s trengthen
t he
d efences
o f
t he
s outh
a nd
e ast
c oasts
t o
p rovide a gainst a ttack b y s ea r aiders . T he c hronology o f t hese w orks i s f ully d iscussed i n c hapter 3 . T he n ew f orts b uilt i n t his a rea a ll d iffer i n d etail , b ut t hey h ave m any b asic f eatures i n c ommon a nd t heir broad c ontemporeinity i s v ery l ikely o n b oth h istorical a nd s tructural g rounds . I t i s o bvious f rom a n umber o f t hese t orts t hat t he b uilders were d ealing with n ew c oncepts i n d efensive a rchitecture . B urgh Castle s till p robably r epresents a t ransitional s tage b etween t he p rincipate s tyle o f f ort a nd t he t ypical l ate R oman d efensive e nciente ( though s ome d oubt h as r ecently b een c ast o n t his ( see J ohnson
J .
1 980B).
A ll
t hese
f orts
a re
c haracterised
by
t he m assiveness o f t heir walls a nd b y t he p rovision o f e xternal t owers a t t he a ngles a nd a t i ntervals a long t he walls . A s n oted a bove, t he p rovision o f e xternal t owers a t t he g ates was n ot u nknown much e arlier. T he p rovision o f e xternal a ngle a nd i nterval t owers i n a m ilitary c ontext i n B ritain i s o nly f ound f rom t he l ate t hird c entury o nwards. T he p lan
o f
B urgh
C astle
w ith
i ts r ounded a ngles
a nd
i nternal t owers
i s n ot t oo f ar r emoved f rom t hat o f e arlier f orts. I ts i rregular q uadrilateral s hape ( fig 7 .2) t hick , t hough s tepped d efensive wall a nd r ampart b ank , c an b e p aralleled a t o ther t hird-century f orts, t hough i t d oes s eem t o l ack t he s tandard f our l arge g ates, t he n orth a nd p ossibly s outh g ates b eing r epresented o nly b y p osterns. T his r eduction i n t he g ateways will h ave helped t o make t he f orts more e asily d efensible , b ut t his n eed n ot h ave b een t he s ole c onsideration . P rincipate f orts were o ver-provided with g ates . O n H adrian 's W all s ome g ates w ere b locked d uring t heir a ctual c onstruction i n t he e arly s econd
c entury a nd t hroughout
t he h istory o f
t hese f orts
t he g ateways
were p rogressively walled u p ( cf B reeze a nd D obson 1 972, 1 95) . A t S outh S hields, a lthough t he s outh g ate was b locked, p erhaps i n t he t hird c entury, t he b locking wall was l ater d emolished, i ts l ower
1 5
c ourses b eing i ncorporated i n t he l atest r oad s urface . T his s urface i s c ontemporary with t he l atest r oad b y t he p rincipia ( pers c omm M r . R . Miket). I n t he e arly t hird c entury, many o f t he s ingle-portal m ilecastle g ateways w ere r educed t o p osterns; o thers w ere r educed o r
b locked
l ater .
T hese
i nclude MC.22
( Daniels
1 978,
8 9),
3 6-40
( ibid, 1 65, 1 67, 1 70, 1 72), 4 9 ( ibid, 1 97), 5 2 ( ibid, 2 20), 5 4 ( ibid, 2 24) a nd 7 9 ( ibid, 2 53). N umerous l arge g ateways were r egarded a s s uperfluous l ong b efore t hey were r egarded a s a s erious d efensive w eakness. T he main e ast g ate a t B urgh C astle i s n ot p rovided with a ny g atet owers, e ither i nternal o r e xternal, a s f ar a s i s k nown ( fig 1 8 .5). S uch s imple, s ingle-portal g ateways a re a lso k nown o f t his d ate a t P evensey, P ortchester ( figs 1 9.1B, 1 9 .2B) a nd p ossibly a t Lympne ( Cunliffe 1 980, 2 30). Q uite why t hey s hould b e s o i ll-defended i s u nclear; i t i s n ot t hat t hey a re i n a ll c ases n aturally p rotected b y t he t opography . P evensey a nd P ortchester h ave h ighly-developed m ain g ates. I n b oth t hese c ases, t he g ate i s s et d eep w ithin t he d efences. a chieved b y
A t t he e ast a nd west g ates o f P ortchester, t his i s i nturning t he f ort wall, t he g ate with i ts i nternal
r ectangular g ate-towers b eing s et a t t he e nd o f t he p assage s o f ormed . A t P evensey, t his p assage i s f ormed b y s etting t he g ate b etween t wo l arge
r ound-fronted p rojecting
t owers
( fig
1 9 .1A) .
T hese
g ates
m ust
h ave b een mainly f or s how a s i t would h ave b een much e asier t o a ttack t he p oorly-defended g ateways e lsewhere o n t he c urtain which have a c arriageway o f s imilar width t o t hat o f t he ' main g ates' . S ome o f t hese f orts a re p rovided with n arrow p ostern g ates which a re a v ery c ommon f eature o f l ate R oman d efences.
S ome p rincipate f orts h ad
t heir g ates r educed s o t hat t hey were l ittle more t han p osterns. T his was u sually a chieved b y b locking o ne p ortal o f t he t win portal g ates g enerally f ound a t t hese f orts, a lthough s ome h ad t heir p ortals p artly b locked , e .g . H altonchesters ( Breeze a nd D obson 1 972 , 1 95) a nd R isingham ( Richmond 1 936 , 1 89) . A t B urgh C astle a nd L ympne ( Cunliffe 1 980 ,
2 54)
t he n orth p osterns
a re p laced
c lose b y
a n
e xternal-tower .
A t R ichborough, t he n orth p ostern ( fig 1 8 .4C) i s s et i nto t he b ase o f o ne o f t he r ectangular t owers which l eads o nto t he b erm t hrough t he e ast wall o f t he t ower b y t he f ort wall . T he n orth p ostern a t Pevensey ( fig 1 9.1C) i s a s lightly S-shaped vaulted passage p enetrating t hrough t he wall, n arrowing f rom 2 .28m a t t he i nside t o 1 .37m a t t he o utside ( Mothersole 1 924,171). T he e xcavator t hought t hat t he g ate w as c losed b y d oors a t b oth e nds o f
t he p assage ( Salzman
1 907 , 1 00 . P ortchester i s t he o nly o ne o f t hese f orts w here n arrow p osterns a re d efinitely k nown n ot t o e xist . N o e vidence w as f ound i n t he r ecent e xcavations o f t he e ast g ate a t L ympne ( Cunliffe 1 980) f or i ts h aving b een r educed
t o a p ostern
( cf .
J ohnson
1 976A ,
5 5) .
T he p rovision o f t owers g reatly i ncreased t he a rea a vailable f or u se a s a f ighting p latform w ith t he a dded a dvantage o ver t he p arapet w alk o f g reater h eight . b e u sed t o e nfilade
E xternal-towers, u nlike i nternal o nes, c ould a lso t he b ase o f t he c urtain a nd n eighbouring t owers .
O n t he c urving wall o f a f ort s uch a s P evensey, more t owers were n eeded t o a chieve t his a nd t hey a re h ence p laced m uch c loser t ogether o n t he t ightly-curving s ections o f t he c urtain t han o n t he r est o f t he c ircuit . B ecause t hey a re s et o n r ounded a ngles, t he a ngle-towers a t B urgh C astle ( fig 2 2.3) d o n ot p roject s ufficiently t o a llow t hem t o e nfilade t he a djacent w all c urtains a nd a re t hus i ll-suited t o f ulfil t heir m ain p urpose . B radwell h as s imilar, r ounded a ngles ( fig 4 .1);
1 6
l ike B urgh C astle ( and D over) i t m ay h ave h ad a n i nternal r ampart . I t h ad t he s ame t riple-tile o ffset a t t he e xterior b ase o f t he wall. T he s outh-west a ngle-tower o f R ichborough ( fig 2 2.5A) i s n ot o f o ne b uild with t he wall ( Loftos-Brock 1 888, 5 2) t hough i ts s ubsequent a ddition t o t he w all m ust h ve b een e nvisaged b y t he wall b uilders . A R oman f ortification w ith a r ight-angled c orner w ould b e u nparalleled i n B ritain . ( This s trongly s uggests t hat t he e nclosure o f H en Waliau c annot b e a d efensive s tructure ( Hogg 1 953 ) - a m ilitary s tore d epot has b een s uggested). F rom m any o f t he S axon S hore f orts, we k now t hat t he d efences were b uilt i n s ections. P ossibly a t R ichborough a d ifferent g ang was t o b uild t he t ower f rom t hat which b uilt
t he wall .
B onding
T he n orth-west a ngle-tower i s b onded i nto t he wall .
c ourses
o f
t ile o r s tone a re a f eature
o f
t hese d efences.
T hey a re a ssociated with wall f aces o f e ither small, n eat a shlars f orming a p etit a ppareil s tyle o f m asonry, o r s plit f lints, n o d oubt d epending o n t he l ocal a vailability o f s tone . Most o f t he f ort walls a re s et o n a n e laborate l attice o f t imber which a lso e xtended i nto t he t ower f oundations . T imber f ramework was a lso u sed i n t he i ntervalt owers a t Richborough t o p rovide e xtra s trengthening f or t he f irst s torey f loors . A t B urgh C astle t here were v ertical-timber b eams l et i nto t he s outh wall ; s even beam h oles were n oticed, e ach 3 3cm x 3 0cm and a n average 2 .59m a part a nd 5 0cm f rom t he i nner f ace o f t he wall . T he d eepest e xtended f or 1 .22m . T he b eams h ad T -shaped e nds r esting o n t iles 2 0cm a bove t he b ase o f t he wall . N o e xplanation f or t heir p resence i s k nown ( Bushe-Fox 1 932A , 6 4-5). I n t he t op o f e ach t ower h ere t here i s ah ole 6 0cms i n d iameter a nd i t h as b een s uggested t hat t hese h oles were c onnected with t he u se o f a rtillery i n t he t owers,
p resumably f orming a p ivot .
I f
t his
i s
s o,
o ne e ngine c ould h ave b een h oused i n e ach t ower.
p resumably
o nly
S uch a f ixed a rc
would have s everely r estricted t he f ield o f f ire o f a n a rtillery p iece. P erhaps t he h oles a re i n s ome way s tructural; J ohnson s uggests t hat t hey m ay h ave s upported t he r oof . I t i s p ossible t hat t he u pper p art o f t he t owers was o f t imber . B oth i ntegral a nd a dded t owers h ave b een f ound a t D over ( Philp 1 977) . I t i s n oteworthy t hat, a lthough
B rancaster a nd Reculver
were o ccupied i n t he
l ate
c entury, t here i s n o e vidence t o s uggest t hat t heir d efences u pdated a nd n o t race o f e xternal t owers h as b een f ound . T he e xternal t owers o f s haped a t B urgh C astle
t hird were
t he S axon S hore f orts d iffer i n s hape : p ear( fig 2 2 .3 ), o ne s emi-circular a nd o ne h orseshoe
s haped a t B radwell ( fig 2 2 .8), r ectangular a nd c ircular a t R ichborough ( fig 2 2.5) a nd U-shaped a t t he o thers ( fig 2 2). Walton C astle, f rom t he e xtant p lan ( fig 4 .2), w ould s eem t o h ave c ircular t owers o nly a t t he a ngles. T he t owers o f B urgh C astle a ll s tand t o a bout t he s ame h eight, a s d oes t he c urtain wall, i .e. 4 .57m . I t i s p ossible t hat t hey never s tood a ny h igher, a t l east i n s tone Norris A . 1 948, 1 07). A gain a t R ichborough , L ympne a nd P ortchester, t he s urviving t owers d o n ot extend a bove t he p resent s urviving walls b ut a t R ichborough a nd L ympne t he t owers p robably s tood much h igher . A t t he f ormer, t he r ectangular t owers had a t hick c oncrete f irst f loor a nd a t s ome t owers, t he b ack wall c an b e s een e xtending a bove t his f oor . F rom f allen f ragments o f t he e ast g ate a t L ympne , C unliffe i nferred g atet owers
o f
a t
l east t wo s toreys
( Cunliffe
1 980 ,
2 41) .
A t P evensey,
t ower o n t he n orth w all r etains i ts u pper s torey w ith o ne t all , h eaded window o f a t ype u sually t hought b y a rtillery .
t o h ave b een d esigned f or u se
B ushe-Fox s uggested t hat t he t hick c oncrete f loors a t
1 7
a
r ound-
R ichborough were n eeded t o s upport a rtillery ( Bushe-Fox 1 932A , 6 3). T he p rovision o f a t l east o ne r oom a t f irst-floor l evel i n a n e xternal-tower i s i n a ny c ase l ikely . A ncient a rtillery, r elying a s i t d id f or i ts p ropulsive p ower o n s prings o f s inew o r h air , n eeded t o b e k ept d ry t o work a t p eak e fficiency. Wall i n i ts
T he c ontemporary A urelian
f irst p hase h ad r ectangular p rojecting
t owers
w ith
r ooms
a t wall-walk h eight p rovided with windows, p erhaps f or a rtillery ( Richmond 1 930, 7 9). A t ower a t S enlis h as t wo windowed r ooms, a t r ampart-walk l evel a nd a t t he l evel a bove ( Johnson 1 973, 2 15 ) . T he T our d e V ivier a t L e Mans h as t hree o pen s toreys . W hether t he t owers were g iven a f lat, b attlemented r oof o r p itched r oof i s u nclear . C ontinental e vidence s uggests t hat b oth s tyles o f r oofing may h ave b een u sed . R ichmond f ound t hat t he p hase I t owers a t R ome h ad f lat r oofs; s tairways l ed u p f rom t he f irst-floor c hamber. T he A rras m edallion s howing a g ate a t L ondon p ortrays i ts t owers w ith c onical r oofs. O ne w ould e xpect t here t o h ave b een a s ystem o f watch-towers o r s ignal s tations a long t he S axon S hore, a s was e arlier p rovided o n t he C umbrian c oast a nd l ater o n t he Y orkshire c oast a nd p erhaps o n A nglesey . T here i s v ery l ittle e vidence f or s uch p osts o n t he S axon S hore . A small watch-tower h as r ecently b een f ound a t Wapping ( Shadwell) a l ittle t o t he e ast o f R oman L ondon ( fig 1 3 .3) . T his i s a s tone-walled s tructure 8m s quare; t o t he s outh were two p arallel d itches which o verlapped i n f ront o f t he t ower . T he i nner d itch r eplaced a l ine o f l arge t imber p osts. A djacent t imber b uildings were p robably c ontemporary with t he t ower ( Johnson T . 1 975) . I t w as s uggested t hat o ne o f t hese b uildings was a b arrack-block . T he t ower r emained i n u se f rom t he l ate t hird c entury a t o f
t he
f ourth
l east u ntil
t he m iddle
( Johnson A 1 975) .
A n umber o f s ites i n E ast Anglia have b een s uggested a s having b een p art o f t he S axon S hore s ystem, among t hem H adleigh ( Essex), C orton ( Suffolk) and T hornham ( Norfolk). Many o f t he s ites s uggested a re known o nly f rom a erial p hotographs.
T heir d ate a nd f unction a re
o ften u nclear . C orton , where a d itch r ound a b uilding 2 2 .85m s quare c ontained l ate f ourth-century p ottery, s eems t he m ost l ikely s ite o f a military s tructure ( Johnson 1 976, 1 26). I t i s very u nlikely t hat a r egular s ystem o f small p osts c ertainly h ave b een f ound . At
Watercrook
and
e ver
e xisted
Templeborough,
t he
- s ome
m ore
d efences
would
may
a lmost
have
b een
r efurbished i n t he l ater t hird c entury . T he f ort a t Watercrook m ay h ave b een e nlarged a nd t he s outh-west wall r ebuilt c irca A D 2 70 . T he wall was r oughly b uilt o f s oft s andstone a nd , u nlike t he e arlier f ort wall, l ittle mortar was u sed ( North a nd H ildyard 1 945, 1 54; P otter 1 979 , 1 55) . T empleborough , a bandoned i n t he s econd c entury, m ay h ave b een r e-occupied i n t he l ate t hird c entury . I t was c ertainly r ef ortified d isuse .
a t
s ome
d ate
a fter
what
A n ew f ort w all w as b uilt,
was
p robably
a l ong
n ot o n t he r emains o f
p eriod
o f
t he p eriod
I I s tone wall , b ut o n t op o f i ts m uch d enuded r ampart b ank . T he w all w as b uilt o f r e-used material , i ncluding b roken b ricks, t iles, s labs o f p ink a nd white c ement, c obbles, b oulders a nd b roken t ombstones . A s lightly i rregular a rea o f c irca 1 .7 ha was e nclosed. T he g ates o f f ort
I II
l ie
s lightly b ehind t hose o f
t he p eriod I I
f ort.
T hree
p ost-holes a t t he s outh-east a ngle s et i nto t he p eriod I II f oundations c ould b e f or a n a ngle-turret o f t his p eriod . T he e xcavator s uggested
1 8
t hat t his work w as c ivilian ( May
1 922,
1 9),
t hough t he c onstruction o f
t he n ew wall s o c losely f ollowing t he p lan o f t hat o f a n e arlier f ort m ay s uggest m ilitary w ork . R ichmond t hought t hat t he c haracter o f t he l ate w ork a nd p aucity o f f inds p robably t o b e a ssociated w ith i t , p rove t hat i ts o ccupation was n ot meant t o b e a l ong o ne ( Richmond 1 923, 2 16). L ittle i s k nown o f t he p ossibly l ate t hird-century f ort a t B aginton b eyond t he s ix m assive p osts f orming i ts s ingle-portal g ateway ( fig 1 8 .3) a nd t he a ssociated w ide e arth b ank a nd v ery w ide r ound-bottomed d itch ( fig 8 .2) ( Hobley 1 974, 2 75-6). I t h as b een s uggested t hat t his r e-occupation s hould b e d ated t o t he f ourth c entury a nd i s p aralleled a t o ther s ites i n t he West Midlands
( Jones
M .
1 979,
6 6
f n.14). Many f eatures o f t he f ort a t C ardiff s uggest t hat i t i s a lso o f l ate t hird-century d ate . I t h as t hick walls, e xternal t owers a nd s quare p lan with two g ates p laced c entrally i n o pposite s ides o f t he f ort ( fig 8 .1), a ll f eatures p aralleled o n t he S axon S hore. I t d oes, h owever, h ave a r ampart b ank a nd t he p resence o f a f oundation b eneath i ts walls which i s n ot a lways f ollowed b y t he p resent f ort wall, h as l ed t o s ome d oubt a s t o t he c ontemporaneity o f t he f oundation w ith t he w all a nd i t t owers . A t t he t wo a ngles i nvestigated , t he n orth-east a nd n orth-west,
t he f oundation d escribes
f oundation o f a p rincipate s tyle f ort
a c urve a s t hough i t was t he
( fig
2 2 .4) .
T he
wall
a nd
t ower
s it awkwardly o n t his; a t t he n orth-east a ngle t he p linth c urves i nwards a nd d isappears i n t he a ngle b etween t he c urtain a nd t he t ower . T he f oundations o f t his t ower a re d ifferent f rom t hose o f t he a djacent w all
- t he
t ower's p linth
i s h igher
t han
t hat
o f
t he
c urtain
wall
o n
o ne s ide a nd l ower a t t he o ther . S uch a d iscrepancy i s s een a t o ther t owers . A t the n orth g ate t he wall f oundation a nd a f ew c ourses o f t he wall p ass u nder t he g uardchambers a nd t he c arriageway . T he wall was partly l evelled t o f orm t he f loor o f t he g uardchambers. T he e xcavator t hought t hat t he f oundation a nd p linth r epresented a n e arlier f ort o n t he s ite w hich w as l ater a lmost t otally d emolish a nd r eplaced b y t he p resent wall ( Ward 1 901, 3 48) . T he b uilt-over p linth a t t he n orth-east a ngle had a d ecidedly weathered l ook - t races o f d ark earth were f ound b etween i t a nd t he g routing o f t he t ower. W heeler s uggested t hat t he a nomalies b etween t he f oundation a nd s upers tructure r epresent a lterations d uring t he c onstruction o f t he f ort ( Wheeler 1 922B,
3 68).
T his i nterpretation would make most s ense;
t here may have b een a s hort p eriod o f c essation i n t he c onstruction work and G . S impson s uggests t hat a f ew y ears c ould b e e nough t o p roduce t he weathered p linth a nd s ome d ark e arth o verlying i t ( Simpson G . 1 963, 7 1). E arlier military o ccupation i s n ow k nown o n t he s ite o f t he e xtant f ort ( Webster , P .V . a nd J . 1 975-8 ) . T he wall , b uilt o n a f oundation 4 .57m wide, was j ust o ver 3 .05m t hick, b ut r educed a t 2 .28m h igh b y
f our o ffsets
t o
2 .59m a nd t hen f urther t o
1 .91m a t 4 .27m
a bove t he g round ( Ward 1 914 , 4 07-8) . I t i s f aced o n b oth s ides w ith a shlars; n o t ile b onding c ourses a re p resent. T he c ontemporary r ampart b ank s urvives t o a height o f 3 .35m . T he t owers a re h alf d ecagons e xcept f or t hat a t t he n orth-east a ngle which i s a n i ncomplete o ctagon . A ll a re b onded i nto t he wall b ut t he m iddle o ne o n t he e ast wall a nd t he n orth g ate-towers were n ot s olid a s t he o thers were. T he s uggested p ostern g ate i n t he h ollow t ower i s h ighly u nlikely . T he n orth g ate w as s ingle p ortal ( fig 2 0 .1); n one o f
t he
l ate
t hird-century
S axon
1 9
S hore
f orts
h as
d ouble
p ortal
g ates .
T he w est,
s outh a nd e ast s ides o f
t he f ort b ow o utwards
t owards
t heir
m iddle , a s d oes t he w est wall a t R ichborough , p art o f which s eems t o h ave b een b uilt a t a d ifferent s tage i n t he c onstruction w ork a nd w as g iven a s lightly d ifferent a lignment ( Johnson J . 1 970, 2 44). T he f ort e ncloses 3 .4 h a . T he s tone-walled e nclosure f ound a t C arisbrooke, l ying b eneath t he m edieval c astle , h as b een c laimed a s a R oman f ort c onnected w ith t he d efence o f t he S axon S hore . T he m asonry r evealed a nd t he p lan o f t he d efences c ould s uggest a R oman d ate . T he v irtual a bsence o f Roman f inds f rom t he s ite m ust, ( Johnson J . 1 976A, 1 41).
h owever ,
c all i ts R oman o rigin i nto q uestion
I t h as b een s uggested t hat t he walled e nclosure a t B rough-on-Humber was b uilt t o h ouse a n aval d etachment. T he p rincipal evidence f or t his i s t he l ack o f n ormal t own b uildings within t he walls a nd t he f act t hat t he h istory o f t he d efences b ears m ore r esemblance t o t hat o f a m ilitary s ite t han t o a R omano-British t own ( Wacher 1 969 ; 1 971 , 1 66) . A n umerus would s eem t o h ave b een s tationed h ere p rior t o i ts r emoval
t o Malton
c irca A D
3 67 o r u nder Magnus Maximus
( Casey
1 979B ,
7 6). T he p lan o f t he d efences ( fig 1 1.1) h owever i s d istinctly u nmilitary. ( The e arly s econd-century n aval b ase a t Dover b ears a r easonable r esemblance t o t hat o f ac ontemporary f ort). T he walls d escribe
a n
i rregular h exagon ;
t he middle n or a t hird o f
t he
t hree
g ates
f ound
l ie n either
t he way a long t hese s ides.
i n
T he r ight-
a ngled t urn i n t he e ast wall i s v ery u nusual . T he west g ate ( fig 2 0 .2B) b ears a r esemblance t o t he n orth p ostern g ate a t R ichborough ( fig 1 8 .4C). T he n orth g ate i n s tone, p hase I , was p rovided with i nternal r ectangular g uardchambers . A D
W acher d ated t his p hase t o c irca
2 70-290 .
Work o n t he d efences a t Binch e ster, Birdoswald, Caernarvon, L eintwardine a nd p ossibly O ld P enrith has b een d ated t o t he t hird c entury . T he s tepped f ort wall a t B inchester was c ompared b y t he e xcavator t o t he G ordianic wall a t L anchester ( Steer 1 938) . T he wall , w here t raced b y S teer , was f ound t o v ary i n w idth f rom 1 .69m t o 2 .62m . T his i s p robably e xplained b y t here b eing t wo p eriods o f s tone wall h ere . E xcavations i n t he i nterval-tower o n t he s outh-west w all f ound t hat a wall o f c rude work o verlay a n e arlier wall o f n eat masonry ( Dobson a nd J arrett 1 958). A ssociated with t his l ater wall was a n i nterval-tower a nd t he f oundations f or t his, o f r e-used a shlars, were d ug i nto t he e arlier r ampart b ank . T he w hole o f t he i nterior h ad b een f illed with r ubble . E . B irley s uggested t hat t his f illing a nd t he e specially d eep f oundations o f t his t ower c ould i ndicate t hat i t was a n a rtillery t ower o f t he t ype s een a t C hesterholm . B onding i nto t he f ort wall w as i ncomplete . T he o nly d ating e vidence f ound - a f langed b owl f rom i n t he r ubble f ill o f t he t ower - would n ow b e d ated t o within t he t hird c entury. P art o f t he e ast w all a t B irdoswald i s s aid t o h ave b een r econstructed ( Daniels
1 978A ,
i n
l arge
m asonry
i n
t he
t hird c entury
2 00 .
I t i s n ot n ow c lear when t he d efences o f C aernarvon w ere r ebuilt i n s tone . I t s eems l ikely t hat t his was s pread o ver a p eriod o f t ime . T he n orth-west g ate o n t he p ottery e vidence i s d ated t o t he m id-second c entury
( Nash-Williams
1 969 ,
6 2) .
W heeler d ated t he f ort w all t o t he
t ime o f S everus a nd t hought t he c ontemporary ( Wheeler 1 922A, 2 74).
2 0
t ower a t t he n orth-east g ate T his t ower, which had n ot been
p rovided w ith
g round-floor
a ccess,
h ad b een f illed s olid w ith l oose
y ellow c ement; h e s uggested t hat i t was a n a rtillery t ower . T he n orth-west t ower a t t he s outh-west g ate h ad a lso b een f illed s olid a nd t he s tone f illing y ielded a l ittle t hird-century p ottery. R ecent e xcavations s uggest t hat a t l east p art o f t he s tone w all was a dded t o t he t urf r ampart i n t he l ate t hird o r f ourth c enturies
( Casey a nd
D avies 1 976). L eintwardine h ad b een d efended b y a t imber-laced r ampart i n t he A ntonine p eriod a nd i t i s p ossible t hat i n t he e arly t hird t op . 2 66).
c entury o r l ater , a wall o f l imestone was b uilt o n t he r ampart T he r ampart was n ever g iven a s tone r evetment ( Stanford 1 968,
O n H adrian's W all , t he c urtain s eems t o h ave b een m aintained i n g ood o rder f or m ost o f t he c entury, b ut a s e arly a s t he b eginning o f t he c entury t here were d rastic a lterations i n t he m ilecastles a nd t urrets . A n umber o f t urrets s eem t o h ave g one o ut o f u se b y c irca A D 1 80 o r A D 1 97 , many o f t hese b eing d emolished a nd t heir r ecesses i nto t he W all f illed i n . T he t owers o ver t he n orth a nd p robably o ver t he s outh g ates o f milecastles a lso s eem t o have b een d emolished a t t he s ame t ime . T he n orth g ates o f many milecastles p osterns, a s were s ome s outh g ates ( see a bove) .
P art
I I
were
n ow
r educed
t o
I nternal B uildings
Id o not p ropose t o mention a ll t he work known t o d ate t o t he t hird c entury i n t he i nterior o f f orts - a f air amount i s known b oth s tructurally a nd e pigraphically. T hroughout t he f irst h alf o f t he c entury, t here was m uch r ebuilding o r r efurbishing within f orts; m uch o f i t will h ave b een r outine maintenance a nd a s s uch may h ave n o p lrticular
significance.
The
l atest
such
work
a ttested
e pigraphically d ates t o t he t ime o f P ostumus. I n t he l ater t hird c entury, buildings s eem t o have been g enerally neglected, n ecessitating t he m ajor r ebuilding w ork u nder C onstantius C hlorus i n t he e arly f ourth c entury . A n umber o f s tructures a nd a dditions t o e arlier b uildings h ave b een t hought t o b e o f l ate d ate - t he w ork o f C onstantius o r o f T heodosius .
Many o f t hese a re n ow k nown t o b e m uch
e arlier a nd i ndicate a m ore g radual c hange i n f ort p lans a nd n o d oubt i n t he g arrisons t hemselves t han h as p reviously b een t hought . P rincipia T he S everan p rincipia a t B ainbridge ( fig 3 0 .2), u nlike i ts Antonine p redecessor ( fig 2 9.1), c onforms t o t he s tandard p lan o f s uch b uildings which i n t he l ater f irst a nd s econd c enturies i n B ritain s eem t o have b een v ery s tandardised . T he p rincipia o f B ewcastle i s p robably o f H adrianic d ate ( Austen, f orthcoming). T he Antonine p rincipia a t B rough-on-Noe i s o f v ery unusual p lan ( fig 2 9.2) with what a ppears t o b e ar ange o f f ive r ooms f acing t he a edes a cross t he b asilica . I t l ooks v ery m uch ( though t he a rchaeological e vidence i s w anting) a s i f t he p rincipia h as b een t urned r ound a nd t he t wo p eriods o f b uildings have b een c onflated o n t he p lan ( Jones G a nd Wild 1 969B f ig 3 3) . T he A ntonine b uilding h ad p resumbly b een t hat f acing s outhw est; i t h as t he s tandard r ange o f f ive r ooms a nd c ould e asily h ave h ad a normal c ourtyard. N ot o nly d oes t he f ort s eem t o h ave b een t urned r ound, i t m ust have b een a ltered i n l ength o n a t l east t wo o ccasions . Mr . G illam n otes t hat t he p lan o f t he l ater b uilding m ay
2 1
h ave b een b rought a bout b ecause t he b uilders s ought t o u tilise t he b asilica a s a t S outh S hields a nd y et a lso u se t he b ack w all o f t he p eriod I p rincipia a s t he f ront wall o f t he n ew b uilding, a s a t C hesterholm . T he b uilding was p ossibly n ot e xtended t o t he northe ast a s t he b uildings i n t he p raetentura r emained i n u se . o f t he l ater p rincipia i s u nclear , b ut i t p resumably d ates
T he d ate t o b efore
t he e nd o f p eriod I I ( Jones G . a nd Wild 1 969A) i n t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury w hen t he p rincipia was t ransformed i nto a wattle a nd d aub
s tructure .
R ichmond b elieved
t hat
t he a edes
r epresented a n
e arly t hird c entury i nsertion i nto a p re-existing principia . T he F lavian t imber p rincipia a t C hester w as o nly r eplaced i n s tone i n t he l ater s econd o r e arly t hird c entury ( Strickland 1 981B, 4 2). s tone p rincipia a t C aerleon m ay a lso o nly h ave b een c ompleted a t t ime ( Boon 1 972A , 2 8) .
T he t his
T he p rovision o f p rincipia with s unken s trongrooms h as g enerally b een d ated t o t he S everan p eriod, b ut a t s ome s ites t hese d ate much e arlier . T he s trongrooms a t B enwell ( Spain 1 930, 1 30) and a t C arrawburgh ( Breeze 1 972, 1 01) a re t hought t o b e p rimary ( the l ater A ntonine f ort a t N ewstead h ad a s trongroom) . O ther s trongrooms m ay b e o f e arlier d ate t han was
f irst
t hought .
Many p rincipia a t s ome t ime i n t heir l ives h ad t heir c ourtyard v erandas walled u p a nd t urned i nto r ooms which w ould s eem t o h ave b een a rmouries o r s torerooms . R IB 1 092 f rom L anchester m ay s uggest t hat a rmouries a nd p rincipia w ere c onnected . A t C hesterholm t hese r ooms were l ater p rovided with s leeper walls t o f orm a r aised f loor.
A s
t he e xcavator n oted, t his d oes n ot mean t hat t he f unction o f t hese r ooms h ad a ltered ( Birley E ., R ichmond a nd S tanfield, 1 936, 2 25). T hey n eed n ot h ave b een u sed f or g rain s torage . T he r eplacement o f v erandas b y r ooms h as u sually b een d ated t o t he e arly f ourth c entury ( Wilkes 1 966) o n n o g ood e vidence . T his c hange has been d ated a t C arrawburgh t o t he H adrianic/Antonine p eriod . I t i s e qually p ossible t hat a t o ther s ites t his work s hould b e d ated t o t he s econd o r t hird c enturies . T he p rincipia a t C hesterholm ( fig 3 2 .1) i s n ow t hought t o b e o f t hird-century d ate . R . B irley d ates i t t o c irca A D 2 70; I would s uggest a d ate o f c irca A D 2 20 f or i ts c onstruction . T he l atest p rincipia a t S outh S hields ( fig 3 2.2) i s p robably o f s imilar d ate . t his
A w orn c oin o f J ulia D omna c ame f rom t he c obble f oundations o f b uilding .
T he
s leeper
walls
i n
t he
b asilica
principiorum
a ttrtbuted t o t he t ime o f C ount T heodosius ( Richmond, 8 ) p robably b elong t o t he t ime o f S everus w hen m ost o f t he f ort was g iven o ver f or u se a s a s upply b ase ( Dore a nd G illam 1 979 , 6 3) . I f t his i s s o, t hen t hey w ill b e a ssociated w ith t he p eriod I I n orth-facing p rincipia . A t C aernarvon t he b asilica i n t he e arly t hird c entury was d ivided i nto t hree l arge r ooms; t he r ear r ange o f r ooms w as a lso r educed f rom f ive t o t hree ( cf. t he p rincipia a t Ambleside, H ardknot and M elandra C astle) a nd a s trongroom w as p laced i n t he a edes . T he s trongroom was s oon r ef bored,
s ealing a n ear-mint c oin o f E lagabalus .
I n t he f loor
was a n umber o f d enarii s uggesting a d ate j ust a fter AD 2 18-22 f or t his w ork . T he w ide e ntrance i nto t he a edes was r educed t o an ormal d oorway n ot o n t he c entral a xis o f t he b uilding . A lso a t t his t ime , a n a psidal h eated r oom was a dded t o t he r ear wall o f t he p rincipia which e xtended a cross t he f ull width o f t he v ia quintana ( fig 3 0.1),
( Wheeler
1 922A ,
2 78f .) .
T he
p rovision
o f
h ypocaust
h eating
t o
r ooms i n p rincipia a gain h as b een c onsidered a f ourth c entury f eature .
2 2
T he h eated r oom i n t he p eriod I I p rincipia a t C hesterholm p rotruding f rom t he r ear wall i s c ontemporary with t he r est o f t he b uilding . T he h ypocausts i n t he r ear r ange a t S outh S hields a re a lso l ikely t o b e o f t hird-century d ate . T he p rincipia a t C arpow
( fig 3 1.1) i s o f u nusual s hape,
b eing v ery
w ide a nd s hort, b ut t he o ther f eatures o f i ts p lan a re n ormal e xcept t hat t he s trongroom was p laced b eneath t he t ribunal. A t R eculver, t he p rincipia ( fig 3 3.2) a gain b asically c onforms t o t he s tandard p lan; t he s ame b uilding a t B rancaster i s k nown o nly f rom a ir p hotographs, b ut i t c ould b e s imilar . T he a edes s eems t o p roject b eyond t he r ear wall o f t he b uilding a nd t o h ave a p olygonal a pse . S uch r earward p rojecting a pses o ccur a t a ll p eriods . E xcavations i n t he 1 9th c entury a t L ympne r evealed what must b e t he r ear r ange o f r ooms o f ap rincipia ( fig 3 4 .1). I t c onsisted o f a s emi-octagonal a psed a edes with t wo l ong r ooms o n e ither s ide, p erhaps o riginally d ivided b y t imber p artitions ( Smith 1 852, 1 9) . T he p osition o f t his b uilding within t he f ort m ay h ave n o s ignificance d ue t o t he e xtensive s lip o f t he r emains o n t his s ite . I f t he b uilding i s t he p rincipia o f t he l ate t hird c entury f ort, t hen i t r epresents t he o nly e arly s tyle m ilitary b uilding y et k nown f rom a l ate S axon S hore f ort .
I ts
c ontemporaneity with t he d efences h as, h owever, b een c alled i nto q uestion . J ohnson n oted t hat t he b uilding i s r ecorded a s h aving b een f ound a t a g reat d epth ( S mith 1 887). Y et, i n t he o riginal r eport, t here i s n o mention o f t his.
I s t his s tatement,
written 3 7 y ears
a fter t he e vent, n ot t he e xcavator's j ustification f or h aving l ocated o nly t wo b uildings within t he f ort? O n t he l ithograph s howing t he e xcavations i n p rogress o n t he b ath-house , t he r emains l ie i mmediately b elow t he s urface . J ohnson s uggests t hat t he b uilding may b e a ssociatd with a n e arlier military o r n aval p resence o n t he s ite . R IB o f
6 6 t he
f ound r e-used i n t he s hore f orts' e ast c lassis
B ritannica ,
p ossibly
i n
t he
g ate r ecords,
m id-second
a p refect
c entury .
S et
o n t he f oundations o f t he monument a t R ichborough i s a r ough wall e nclosing a r ectangular a rea ( fig 3 4 .2) which J ohnson s uggests c ould b e t he p rincipia . L ittle o f t he e xterior wall i s k nown a nd n o i nternal walls. I ts p osition a t t he e nd o f t he main r oad e ntering t he f ort would s uggest t his f unction,
b ut i ts p urpose must r emain
u nclear . I t i s n ot k nown whether s uch a b uilding was d eemed n ecessary a t t his p eriod, t hough a t t he f orts i n t he n orth a nd west where t hey s urvived i nto t he f ourth c entury, t hey s eem t o h ave c ontined i n u se a s a dministrative b uildings . O n t he C ontinent m any l ate f orts s how n o e vidence o f a c entral b uilding . A t D robeta ( fig 3 7 .2)
t here was a l ate t hird-century b uilding o f d ifferent p lan f rom a
n ormal p rincipia , b ut n o d oubt f ulfilling t he s ame f unction ( Florescu 1 967). T he D iocletianic p rincipia a t P almyra ( fig 3 8) i s o f more n ormal p lan , t hough t he c ourtyard h as b een d ispensed w ith ( Richmond 1 963,
f ig 4 ).
N o t race o f a p rincipia h as b een f ound w ithin t he f ort a t P iercebridge ( Keeney 1 946-53) . E xcavations o n t he s ite o f t he p resumed p rincipia p roved t hat i t d id n ot o ccupy t he p osition e xpected i f t he f ort f aced n orth . Much o f t he c entral a rea o f t he f ort was c overed b y a g ravel l ayer s et o n t he u ndisturbed s oil a nd a ssociated w ith w all f oundations a nd d rains . N o s ign o f t he n orth-south r oad was f ound w here e xpected a nd t he e ast-west r oad s urface m erged with t he g ravel s pread . I t i s p ossible t hat t he f ort f aced e ast a nd t he principia may s till b e f ound, t hough t his s eems u nlikely. T he s tructure f ound b y K eeney
2 3
would s eem t o impinge o n t he a rea n eeded f or a p rincipia f acing t he e ast g ate . O bservation o f a s ewer t rench i n 1 976 r evealed f ragments o f
a v ery
well-built
s tructure w est
o f
t he c entre o f
t he f ort
( Scott
1 977) . A t F orden G aer , t he s econd-century n orth-south r oad s topped s hort o f t he p eriod I I p rincipia i n t he n ormal way. I n t he t hird c entury , t he whole a rea o f t he f ormer p rincipia was c overed w ith c lay f loors a nd t he r oad l evels o f t he t hird a nd f ourth c enturies were f ound c utting a cross t he e arlier c entral b uilding
( Pryce a nd Pryce
1 929 , 1 10 . A nother a nomaly o f t his f ort w as t hat i ts d efences were n ever r ebuilt i n s tone, which may a lso h ave b een t he c ase a t t he n earby f ort o f L eintwardine .
P raetoria T hird-century p raetoria a re k nown a t L ancaster ( fig 3 9 .2) a nd p ossibly a t C arpow ( fig 3 9.1). O ne c ould b e p resent a t R eculver t o t he west o f t he p rincipia . W here t he p lan i s k nown , t hey s eem t o c onform t o t he e arlier t ype o f c ourtyard h ouse ; i n d etail t hese b uildings n ever had a s tandardised p lan .
D uring t he t hird c entury a t Caersws ( fig
4 0 .1) a s uite o f t hree h eated r ooms was a dded t o t he p raetorium extending o ver t he v ia q uintana; t hese r ooms may have r epresented a dditional l iving a ccommodation r ather t han a b ath-suite ( Daniels, J ones G a nd P utnam 1 967 , 6 5) . T he p raetorium a t B irdoswald i s k nown t o h ave b een t otally r uinous i n t he l ate t hird c entury ( RIB 1 912), a s may h ave b een t hat a t Lancaster . T he p raetorium a t Bewcastle i s p robably o f H adrianic d ate; i t m ay h ave g one o ut o f u se o r a t l east b een s everely r educed i n s ize i n t he t hird o r f ourth c enturies ( Richmond , H odgson a nd S t . J oseph 1 938 , 4 ) . Mr . P . A usten a rgues t hat R ichmond's p eriod I II s tructures o verlying t his b uilding n eed n ot d ate s o l ate a s t he e arly f ourth c entury a nd h e s uggests t hat t he p raetorium m ay n ot h ave b een c orrectly i dentified - t he b uilding c ould b e t he v aletudinarium . T he p hase V b uilding a t B inchester , p ossibly t o b e i dentified a s
a p raetorium,
i s n ow d ated t o t he l ater t hird
c entury a t t he e arliest . A b arbarous r adiate i n a c onstruction t rench o f t he b uilding .
o f
A D
2 70-90 w as
f ound
G ranaries G ranaries r etained t heir o riginal u sage t hroughout t he t hird c entury a nd, d ue t o t heir s trong c onstruction, t hey s urvived well . A t t wo s ites h owever, S outh S hields a nd C hester, s ome a t l east o f t he g ranaries c eased t o b e u sed f or s torage . With t he withdrawal f rom S cotland i n t he e arly t hird c entury, t he p resence o f a l arge s upply b ase a t S outh S hields was n o l onger n ecessary . T he r eturn o f t he c ohors V G allorum f rom C ramond a t t his t ime would have c reated a s hortage o f l iving a ccommodation within t he f ort; s ome o f t he g ranaries a re k nown t o h ave b een c onverted i nto l iving a ccommodation t his w as d ated t o t he e arly f ourth c entury b ut a n e arly t hird-century d ate i s more l ikely. I n g ranary C 12 ( VIII) t he f lagged f loor was r emoved, t he v entilation s hafts were f illed with e arth a nd t he v entilators w alled u p . T he b uilding was d ivided u p i nto f our s ets o f t hree r ooms, o ne o f which was f lagged ( fig 2 8 .4). S imilar c hanges o ccurred i n o ther g ranaries ( Richmond 1 934, 9 4). R ichmond c ompared t hese s uites t o t he two s uch Birdoswald f ound i n 1 929,
u nits i n t he C onstantian b arrack a t a nd t o another two suites i n t he
2 4
' Constantian'
principia
a t
C hesterholm .
g ranaries b y t he p orta p rincipalis d extra
A t
C hester
t he
t hree
w ere d emolished - o ne a fter
i t had b een u sed f or a nother p urpose ( Petch a nd T hompson 1 959, 3 7, 5 4) . N o b uttressed g ranaries a re t o b e s een a t R eculver , t hough t hey c ould p ossibly h ave b een p resent i n t he p raetentura , m uch o f which h as b een e roded b y t he s ea . N o t race o f g ranaries was f ound a t R ichborough . T he b uildings o n s ites I V a nd V II ( fig 4 9.3) c ould p ossibly have b een u sed f or s torage, t he v erandas f orming l oading p latforms, b ut t heir p osition o n t he m ain f ort r oads m akes t his a b it u nlikely . T hey h ad n o p rovision f or r aised f loors .
I nternal B ath-Houses T he p rovision o f b ath-houses within f orts ( except f or t hose i n p raetoria) was n ot u sual i n t he e arly R oman p eriod , t hough l egionary f ortresses w ere s o p rovided , a s were a n umber o f f orts o n t he A ntonine W all . I n t he t hird c entury t hey b ecame m ore c ommon , p ossibly d ue t o t he g reater amount o f s pace within t he d efended e nclosures. A t B recon G aer, a b ath-house ( fig 2 7.3) was p laced i n t he midst o f t he p raetentura when p resumably t he f ort g arrison h ad b een r educed . T his b uilding c ould d ate t o t he t hird c entury ( Simpson G . 1 963, 3 6). T he H adrianic b ath-house a t B ewcastle a lmost c ertainly l ay w ithin t he f ort d efences f rom t he s tart. T he f ort a t B irrens, which i s c ontemporary with t he p resumed s econd-century f ort a t B ewcastle, d oes n ot a ppear t o h ave h ad a n i nternal b ath-house . I t was a bandoned b efore t he e nd o f t he s econd c entury. A H adrianic e xternal b athh ouse i s k nown a t N etherby
( presumably h ere
t here was n ot a n i nternal
b ath-house) . I nternal b ath-houses o f u nknown d ate a re p resent i n t he o utpost f orts a t Risingham a nd H igh R ochester a nd a b ath-house was b uilt within t he p raetentura a t Haltonchesters ( fig 2 7 .1). Mr. G illam s uggests t hat t he s o-called S everan b ath-house i n t he e xtension i s o f s econd-century d ate, t hough i t must p ost d ate t he f ort's c onstruction a s i t o verlies a f ort d itch .
I t would h ence p re-date
t he e xtension a nd w as p robably d emolished b y t he t ime t he e xtension was built, b eing r eplaced b y t he l arge b ath-house n orth o f t he v ia p rincipalis ( cf. D aniels 1 978A , 8 7; where i t i s d ated t o t he l ate f ourth c entury) . R eculver h as t wo small b ath-houses ( fig 2 7 .4 ) i n t he p raetentura, o ne a t l east o f which d ates t o t he l ater t hird c entury ( Philp 1 969A). A t b oth R ichborough a nd L ympne, small b ath-houses have been f ound; t hat a t Richborough ( fig 2 8.2) was poorly c onstructed which n ecessitated n umerous r epairs d uring i ts l ife . T he e xcavator s uggested t hat d ue t o i ts small s ize, i t m ay have b een i ntended f or u se b y o fficers o nly . I t i s p ossible t hat a b ath-house e xisted within t he f ort a t P ortchester - v oussoir b ox t iles were f ound b ut n o t race o f t he s tructure w ith w hich t hey w ere a ssociated . A nother m ay h ave b een f ound i n t he s outh-west a ngle a t C ardiff i n t he 1 8th c entury . T he b ath-house f ound b y L ysons i n 1 778-79 under t he w est e nd o f S t . M ary's c hurch a t D over , c ould p ossibly l ie w ithin t he S axon S hore f ort a nd may b e o f t hat d ate ( Johnson J . C aernarvon
a s mall b ath-house
( fig
2 7 .5B),
o f
1 976A,
9 5).
A t
s imilar p lan t o t hat o f
R ichborough, was p robably b uilt t owards t he c lose o f t he t hird c entury . I t w as n ever c ompleted a nd b y t he e arly f ourth c entury i t h ad been d ismantled ( Casey a nd Davies 1 976). T he b ath-house a t P iercebridge ( fig 5 2 .1) m ay h ave f ormed p art o f a c ourtyard b uilding , a lthough o f
t he
t he
c ontemporaneity
b uilding has
o f
t he
b ath-suite
a nd
n ot y et b een e stablished;
2 5
t he b y
e astern
r ange
t he m id-fourth
c entury t hey a ppear t o have f ormed p art o f t he s ame b uilding.
T he
b ath-suite c ould p re-date t he e ast r ange b y c irca 9 0 years . In i ts e arlier p hase i t may h ave s tood i n i solation ( Scott and L arge 1 979).
B arracks a nd S tables O n a n umber
o f
s ites ,
b arracks
a nd/or
s tables
o f
s econd-century
d ate
c ontinued i n u se i nto t he t hird c entury. I n t he praetentura a t I lkley t he s table , p robably o f A ntonine o rigin , r emained i n u se i nto t he m id-fourth c entury without a ny a pparent r ebuilding . I ts method o f c onstruction, u tilising s ingle r ows o f l arge, r oughly-squared s tones w hich would h ave s upported h orizontal s ole p lates a nd a t imber s uperstructure , w ould n ot m ake e ven a l arge-scale r ebuilding e asy t o i dentify a rchaeologically ( Hartley 1 966 , 3 6-7 , 3 8) . Many b arracks were, h owever, r ebuilt i n t he t hird c entury a s, being t imber o r p art-timbered b uildings, t hey would n o d oubt r equire c onstant m aintenance . I n s ome i nstances, c hanges t ook p lace within t hese b uildings . T he d ating o f t he b uildings f ound a t Maryport ( fig 4 6 .4) i s u nclear a nd t he p eriods a ssigned t o e ach o f
t he t wo b uildings
may n ot b e c ontemporary i n s ome c ases . A t s ome t ime ( not b efore t he v ery e nd o f t he s econd c entury) t he western b uilding was r ebuilt a s a s ingle u nit , i ts walls e nclosing t he c enturion's s uite a nd t he v eranda ( Jarrett 1 976, 3 6). A t Ravenglass ( fig 4 6 .5) t he t hird-century b arrack-block 6 was v ery s imilar t o i ts s econd-century p redecessor o n which i t was s uperimposed . s imilar .
T he p hase
T he c ontemporary b arrack-block 7 was a lso
3 s tructures
r epresent
s everal p eriods
o f
t imber
b uildings; a t s ome t ime b etween c irca A D 2 00 a nd 3 50 b arrack-blocks 6 , 7a nd 8 were b urnt d own b ut immediately r ebuilt ( Potter 1 979A , 3 6ff). When
b uilding
X IV a t
H ousesteads
was
r ebuilt
i n
t he
e arly
t hird
c entury , t he n orth wall o f t he b uilding was m oved 3 0cm t o t he n orth . I n t he f irst t hree e astern c ontubernia t he e xcavator t hought t hat h e f ound e vidence f or t he u nit b eing widened b y 1 .52m ( Wilkes 1 961, 2 84) . R e-excavation o f p art o f b uilding X IV i n 1 981 f ailed t o f ind a ny e vidence f or s uch a w idening o f t he c ontubernia i n p eriod I I . Two o f t he walls f ound b y Wilkes were s een t o d ate f rom t he f irst c halet p hase, Wilkes' p eriod I II .
Q uite what t he p eriod I b uilding XV h ad
b een i s u nclear . T he t wo r ooms f ound a re o f s imilar s ize to t he c ontubernia i n b uilding X IV . T hey c ould b e t he r emains o f a normal b arrack-block , t hough t he e xcavators d id n ot t hink t hat t he p eriod I a nd I I b uildings h ad b een a s l ong a s t he p eriod I II s tore b uilding . F urther e xcavation i n t he e astern e nd o f t his b uilding i n 1 981 s uggested t hat a t n o t ime h ad t here b een a b arrack-block o n t his s ite . B uilding XVI, which m ay b e i ts p artner t o t he s outh, a ppears t o have b een a b arrack-block a t s ome t ime i n i ts c ontubernia w as n oted i n b uilding X III . I n
t he
e arly
n orth-east
p raetentura
t hird-century
n orthern
a t
l ife .
C hesterholm ,
d efences,
N o m ajor c hange i n t he
c ontemporary
a b uilding
with
t he
m easuring 8 m b y a t
l east 1 5m was b egun b ut b efore i t was c ompleted a smaller b uilding, 6 .5m b y 4 m i nternally, w as e rected . T his w as r eplaced b y b uildings I -III ( Bidwell 1 981), which p robably r epresent two barrack-blocks . T hese a re o f u nusual p lan ( fig 4 2.2); t he o fficers' q uarters a re s eparated f rom t he r est o f
t he b uilding b y a n arrow
2 6
a lley and
t he
c ontubernia a re a lso s eparated f rom e ach o ther b y n arrow e aves
d rips .
T heir i rregular l ayout matches t hat s een a t t he n orth a nd west g ateways o f t he f ort. I f t hese b uildings e xtended t o t he v ia p rincipalis, t heir l ength o f 4 1m c ould h ave a ccommodated s ix p airs o f s tructures s imilar i n s ize t o I IA, B a nd I IIA, B ( pers c omm Mr . P . I f t hese b uildings r eally a re b arracks, t he p rovision o f o nly s ix c ontubernia i s s uprising . D oes i t s uggest t hat t he i nfantry c entury h ad b een r educed i n n umber? T here i s n o c lear e vidence f or t his f rom o ther s ources. Alternatively, a p ortion o f t he u nit m ay h ave been p ermanently o utstationed o r h ave b een a llowed t o l ive o utside t he f ort . We a re f aced with t he p roblem h ere, a s a t H ousesteads a nd e lsewhere , o f t he k nown g arrison o f t he f ort b eing t oo l arge t o f it i nto t he b arrack a ccommodation t hat s eems t o have b een a vailable . I t would b e h azardous t o t ake t his d iscussion f urther i n t he c ase o f C hesterholm where o nly a small p art o f t he f ort h as y et b een e xcavated . I n
t he
l ate
s econd
c entury a t C hester,
a n umber o f b arracks
were
d emolished a nd n ever r ebuilt ( Droop a nd N ewstead 1 931A , 7 ; 1 936 , 5 ) . As imilar s ituation i s f ound a t C aerleon where o ccupation i n i nsula I II was t hought t o h ave g enerally c eased c irca A D 2 00 . B arrack n umber 1 2 h ad b een d emolished a nd l evelled a t t his t ime ( Boon 1 972A, 5 6). MacMullen s uggested t hat t his was t he r esult o f t he o fficial r ecognition o f s oldiers' m arriages . Men m oved o ut t o l ive w ith t heir f amilies i n t he c annabae o r v ici b ut , a s m ost s oldiers d id n ot m arry m any b arrack-blocks r emained i n u se ( eacMullen 1 963) . A t R avenglass t here was
s ome a lteration i n t he c ontubernia walls b ut
t he
b uildings
t hree
f ound was
p rovided t o b e a scertained
n ot
e xposed f or t he n umbers
( Potter
1 979A ,
f ig
e nough
o f
o f c ontubernia
5 ) .
T he e arly t o m id-third c entury b arrack-block a t B owness ( fig 4 6 .3) was c irca 7 .52m wide ; a s ingle wooden p artition was f ound ( Potter 1 975) . T he n orth-east H adrianic b arrack-block a t Wallsend was r eplaced b y a s table ( fig 4 6 .2 ) a t s ome d ate a fter c irca A D 1 80 ( Daniels 1 978A , 5 8) . T he S everan b uilding, p robably a b arrack-block, a t E bchester i n t he n orth p raetentura , was b uilt a cross t he i ntervallum r oad a nd s et b ack c irca 3 .05m i nto t he c lay r ampart b ank . T he e xcavator s uggests t hat t his may h ave f ormed a n e xtension t o a n e arlier b arrack-block ( Jarrett 1 960A, 2 15). I n t he r etentura t he p eriod V I s tone b uilding d ates w ithin
t he
t hird c entury
( Maxfield a nd R eed
1 975,
f ig
4 ) .
L ittle
o f
i t was e xposed .
A t t he n orthern e nd o f t he e xcavation was a n o pus
s igninum f loor .
Two d rains s eem t o h ave b een a ssociated with t he
b uilding. R IB
3 34
f rom C aerleon r ecords
t he r estoration o f
t he s eventh c ohorts'
b arrack-blocks f rom g round l evel u nder V alerian a nd G allienus . L ittle w ork was d one within t he f ort a t Malton b y C order a nd K irk a nd e ven l ess was p ublished . T races o f t hird c entury b uildings were f ound; s ome will p robably h ave b een b arracks . O n a n u npublished s ection a t p resent l odged i n t he Y orkshire Museum , a s tone b uilding o f p eriod I I c irca A D 2 60-80 i s r ecorded . I nfant b urial n o.29 i s s et i nto i ts f loor.
T he
s ignificance
o f
s uch
i nfant
b urials
i s
d iscussed
i n
c hapter 5 . T hird c entury o ccupation a t D oncaster i s r epresented o nly b y t races o f i nsubstantial h uts o n t he m etalled s urfaces o f t he i nternal s treets ( Dolby 1 972) . T hese c ould p ossibly b e c ivilian d wellings . T he f ort
2 7
s eems
t o h ave b een a bandoned b y
c entury
( Buckland
a nd D olby
t he m ilitary
1 972 ,
2 74) .
T he
f or a t ime
i n t he
a bsence
r ecognisable
o f
t hird
b arrack-blocks within t he l ate t hird-century S axon S hore f orts s ets t hem a part f rom t he f orts h eld a t t he s ame t ime a nd l ater i n t he r est o f B ritain . T here i s a h int, however, o f t he p resence o f r egular b uildings, p ossibly b arracks, within t he f orts o f L ympne a nd p erhaps P evensey . R oach S mith r ecords t hat i n t he s outh-east c orner o f t he f ort a t L ympne " In t he u pper p art marked ' a' o n t he plan , broken walls o f ab uilding were f ound, b ut t hey were s o d islocated t hat i t was
h opeless t o a ttempt t racing t hem a nd w e c ould o nly s urmise t hat
t hey h ad o riginally f ormed a p ortion o f a s eries o f l ong, which p robably e xtended a cross t he a rea ." ( Smith 1 852,
l ow e difices 1 8) . These
r emains c ould p re-date t he S axon S hore f ort, b ut t hey c ould j ust a s e asily b e o f l ate t hird-century d ate - t he d ate a ccepted b y C unliffe f or t he p rincipia a nd b ath-house ( Cunliffe 1 980 , 2 57 ) . S tructures , p resumably f or t he h ousing o f t roops i n t hese f orts, a re very e phemeral a nd were n o d oubt l argely m issed b y e arly e xcavators. A t P evensey, S alzman f ound 9 hearths, s ome s et a t r egular i ntervals o f 6 m , w ith i n s ome c ases a k ind o f f loor o f m ortar a nd g reensand c hips r ound t he h earth ; t here were a lso t races o f s hallow d itches d ividing t he d ifferent h ut a reas . H e n otes t hat s ome o f t hese h earths r ested o n t he n atural c lay while o thers s at o n s everal i nches o f b lack e arth; a ll were c overed b y ac onsiderable d epth o f b lack e arth, p resumably o ccupation material. T he p resence o f a l arge n umber o f n ails a nd h alf-baked p ieces o f c lay b earing t he i mpressions o f wattles h ints a t t he m ethod o f c onstruction employed . I n t he f ollowing y ear , h e f ound l ittle s ign o f o ccupation i n t he n orth-western p art o f t he s ite . A t imber-lined
well
c ontained
masses
o f
r ushes
a nd
t he
e xcavator
s uggested t hat t hese m ay h ave b een u sed f or t hatch ( Salzman 1 907, 1 08 ; 1 908A , 8 5) . A q uantity o f R oman t iles s uggests s ome m ore s ubstantial b uildings w ithin t he f ort ( Salzman 1 908B, 1 30 , 1 32) . S imilar t races o f l ate b uildings were n oted a t R ichborough - p atches o f m ortar f loors, p ebble a reas a nd b urnt f ragments o f d aub s howing wattle impressions ( Bushe-Fox 1 926). T he r emains o ccurred in a n i ndiscriminate a nd p ractically unplanned f ashion . T he f loors s eem u sually t o have b een o f wood o r t rodden e arth; o utside t hese b uildings were c obble p aths a nd y ards ( Bushe-Fox 1 928, 2 5-6). O ne p ossible h ut f loor c onsisted o f a c lay s pread a t l east 4 .88m w ide a nd c irca 1 5cm t hick i n t he c entre; t he e dges o f t he f loor were i ll d efined ; i n t he c entre was a v ertical c avity 1 5cm i n d iameter b y 3 0cm d eep,
p erhaps
a p ost-hole.
O n t he n orth s ide o f
t his h ole was a
p ossible h earth a nd a nother m ay h ave l ain o n t he e astern s ide o f t he f loor. T he c oins f ound o n o r n ear t his f loor were o f l ater t hirdc entury d ate r ather t han f ourth c entury . I n s ections 4 4 a nd 4 6 t here was s ome e vidence i n ' the u pper s trata' f or t he e xistence o f c hannels w hich m ay h ave c ontained t he s ill b eams 1 932B, 3 3-4). I n t he n orthern p art o ccasionally f ound. S ome o f t he P ortchester s eem t o d ate t o t he s econd
o f w ooden b uildings ( Bushe-Fox o f t he s ite, t ile f loors were s imilar b uildings f ound a t q uarter o f t he f ourth c entury,
t hough R 1 a nd R 2 p robably d ate t o t he f ort's c onstruction . R 1 ( fig 4 9 .4A ) i s r epresented o nly b y e avesdrip g ullies which t ogether d efine t wo r ectangular a reas , o ne 6 .7 b y 5 .5m , t he o ther 7 .6 b y 6 .1m . T here i s e vidence o f r ecutting i n o ne g ully; t he t wo n orth-south g ullies s imilarly c ould r epresent t wo p eriods o r may d efine a n a lleyway b etween t wo s eparate s tructures . T hese g ullies a re t oo i rregular t o h ave h eld s ill b eams . T he e xcavator s uggests t hat t he b uilding s et
2 8
w ithin t he g ullies was o f s ill b eam c onstruction w ith a r aised w ooden f loor, t hough h e n otes t hat t he g ullies may h ave s urrounded t ents. O verlying t he b uilding was a s pread o f b roken , c halky m ortar a nd d aub u p t o 8 cms t hick which c ould b e t he b uilding d ebris o f R l. R 2 ( fig 4 9 .4C) i s a lso o nly r epresented b y g ullies which d elimit t wo r ectangular a reas, e ach a pproximately 3 b y 5m . A f ew f ragments o f d aub were r ecovered f rom t he l ayer s ealing t he b uilding , b oth o f w hich a re t hought t o h ave g one o ut o f u se c irca A D 3 45 ( Cunliffe 1 975, 6 67 ). W ithin t he s outh-west c orner o f t he f ort a t D over , a c ircular , s qualid t imber h ut with wattle a nd d aub walls was f ound t erraced i nto t he h ill .
I t d ates t o t he S axon S hore f ort p eriod ,
b ut n o c loser d ate h as
y et been g iven t o i t ( Philp 1 973, 8 7). T he l ate C . G reen f ound t races o f R oman t imber b uildings w ith m ortar f loors i n t he n orth-east a ngle a t B urgh C astle, which a ppear t o h ave l ain n ext t o t he f ort walls ( Johnson J . 1 980B, 3 26). A t C ardiff, p ost-holes b elonging t o l ate R oman b uildings were f ound o ver a wide a rea i n t he r egion o f
t he
s outh g ate a nd m ay h ave b een a ligned w ith t he l ate f ort . I n o ne a rea t hese b uildings were o f a t l east t wo p hases . O verlying s ome o f t hem w as c obbling, o ften mixed with c lay, which i n t urn was o verlain b y b urnt d aub i n t he o ne p lace u ndisturbed b y l ater a ctivity a nd J . 1 975; 1 976). P robably c ontemporary w ith t he h uts a t t hese f orts,
( Webster ,
P .
ap air o f b arracks
was built a t R eculver t o t he e ast o f t he p rincipia o n a d ifferent a lignment a nd f rontage t o t he e arlier b uildings . T hey w ere e ach 7 .2m w ide with c lay walls o n s tone f oundations a nd a c lay f loor a nd o ne a t l east h ad p ainted wall p laster . t hird c entury ( Philp 1 969B). e arlier
d escribed a s
T hey w ere d erelict b y t he e nd o f t he T hese b uldings a re p robably t hose
" two b uildings
f urther
e ast
a ppear
t o h ave b een
l iving q uarters o ther t han barracks a nd y ielded two i nfant b urials" ( Philp 1 963). Another p ossible b arrack-block, o f which o nly o ne c orner was f ound, l ay i n t he n orth-eastern praetentura . I t was a s ubstantial s tone b uilding with walls o f s quared s tone c irca 6 7cm t hick which was p robably r oofed i n t ile a nd h ad a w ooden f loor . I t m ay d ate f rom t he l ate t hird c entury a nd c ontinued i n u se, p robably i nto t he f ourth c entury ( Philp 1 959, 1 02-3). A small h ut o f u nspecified d ate with a t ile f loor a nd c lay walls within t he f ort ( Philp 1 957, 1 75) i ndicates t hat a t s ome d ate R eculver may have c onformed m ore t o t he s tyle o f t he o ther S axon S hore f orts .
R ampart B uildings R ampart b uildings i n a uxiliary f orts h ave g enerally b een t hought o f a s l ate a dditions b rought a bout b y l ack o f a ccommodation within t hese f orts. L ittle e vidence f or t heir d ate h as u sually b een n oted . A t C aerleon a nd C hester,rampart b uildings were p resent i n t he s econd c entury; a t t he f ormer, t hose a long t he n orth-west wall were d emolished c irca A D 2 00 a nd r eplaced b y a s ingle s tructure e xtending f rom t he s ite o f t he t urret n ext t o t he west a ngle r ight u p t o t he porta d ecumana ( Boon 1 927A, 5 4). A t Chester t he numerous s tandardised s econd-century s tone r ampart b uildings, which a t l east i n o ne c ase h ad r eplaced t wo p eriods o f t imber r ampart b uildings ( pers . c omm. Mr . D . F . P etch), were d emolished a t t he e nd o f t he s econd c entury a nd
t heir r emains
m erged
2 9
i nto
t he
r ampart
( Thompson F .
1 965,
2 8 ;
c f .
D avey
1 973 ,
8 ) .
A n e arly s econd-century r ampart b uilding
b etween t he n orth-west g ate a nd n orth a ngle a t Y ork m ay h ave g one
o ut
o f u se i n t he f irst h alf o f t he t hird c entury; i t was c ertainly d emolished b efore t he c onstruction o f t he f ourth-century r ampart b ank ( Miller 1 928 , 8 9 ). A nother o f s imilar p lan a nd p robably t herefore o f t he s ame d ate , m ay h ave c ontinued i n u se well i nto ( RCHM Y ork I , 4 5).
t he
f ourth c entury
E xcavations i n 1 978 a nd 1 979 within t he p raetentura o f H ousesteads i mmediately s outh o f t he n orth wall r evealed r ampart b uildings b uilt n ot
l ater
t han
d emolished b y r ampart b ank .
t he
e arly
t hird
c entury
( fig
2 6A).
T hey
were
t he f ourth c entury a nd t heir s ite c overed b y a n ew T hese b uildings were u sed f or i ndustrial a ctivities
a nd t he a bsence u nroofed a reas. d ivided b y t hree t he a ngle-tower ( Daniels 1 980B,
o f s outh walls s uggests t hat t hey may h ave been T here were f our s uch a reas u p t o 8 .5 b y 4 m i n s ize, s hort n orth-south walls . T he s econd-century o ven b y was s hut o ff b y a f ourth wall b ut r emained i n u se 9 ). O n t he e ast wall, n orth o f t he g ate, a nother
r ampart b uilding was
f ound which c ontained o vens.
I t was
l ater
r eplaced b y a n i nterval-tower , t he i nterior o f t he r ampart b uilding b eing f illed with w hin b oulders t o p rovide a s olid f oundation . I t i s p ossible t hat o ther r ampart b uildings within t he f ort d ate e arlier t han t he f ourth c entury a nd h ad g one o ut o f u se b y t hat d ate . T he b uilding o n t he s outh wall b y t he s outh-east a ngle i s o f s econd o r t hird c entury d ate a nd c ontinued i n u se i nto t he l ater f ourth c entury ( fig 2 6D, S impson F . 1 976, 1 51). T he r ange o f r ampart buildings a t G reat C hesters b ehind t he w est wall m ust d ate t o t he s econd o r t hird c enturies ( fig 2 5 .1) . T he m ost n ortherly , w hich a ppears t o h ave b een a smithy,
was a ssociated w ith a h oard o f c irca 2 0 d enarii o f t he e arly
emperors ( Gibson 1 903B, 3 3).
R ecent e xcavations i n t he n orth-east
p raetentura a t C hesterholm u ncovered a b uilding ( IV) s et i n t he r ampart b ut l ying a l ittle o ver l m f rom t he f ort wall . I t was e rected d uring t he t hird c entury b ut was d emolished before c irca A D 2 70 ( Bidwell 1 981). A t H altonchester t here were two r ampart b uildings, p robably o f t hird-century d ate ( Jarrett 1 959, 1 89). E bchester a nd H igh R ochester , b uildings were a llowed t o e xtend t he v ia s agularis
a nd o nto
t he
r ampart
d uring
t he t hird c entury .
A t o ver I n
b oth c ases t hese may b e e xtensions t o t he e arlier b arrack-blocks. T he S everan o r C aracallan b uildings ( period I II) i n t he n orth-west p art o f t he f ort a t B ewcastle e xtended o ver t he i ntervallum r oad a nd n early u p t o t he f ort w all . T he r ampart b anking h ad b een r emoved t o a llow t his ( pers. c omm. Mr. P . A usten). I n t he r etentura a t B irdoswald a b uilding o f e arly t hird-century d ate , n ot r especting t he l ayout o f t he e arlier b uildings, e xtended a cross t he v ia q uintana ( Richmond 1 931, 1 25). I n 1 928 a nd 1 929, two b uildings were e xcavated t o t he n orth o f t he v ia p rincipalis b y t he e ast g ate . I n t he H adrianic p eriod t he n orthern b uilding was p robably a b arrack-block . I n p eriod I I b oth b uildings m ay have r emained s eparate ( fig 4 9 .1); o f t he n orthern o ne, l ittle s urvived . T he s outhern o ne was a ltered , t hough t o w hat p urpose i s u nclear . T he r oom a t i ts e astern e nd I IA m ay h ave b een a c ookhouse - h earths a nd a mill were f ound within i t ( Richmond a nd B irley E . 1 930, 1 72). A b akehouse i s k nown a t R eculver - a l arge m asonry b uilding w est o f t he p rincipia c ontained 1 0 small d omestic o vens a nd m any q uern f ragments . B eneath t he f oundations o f t his b uilding were t hree i nfant b urials ( Philp 1 967). A nother s uch b uilding may h ave b een r ecognised b y
3 0
R oach S mith a t L ympne ( Smith 1 852, 2 2). O verlying t he e astern b uilding a t Maryport - p robably i n t he m id-third c entury - was a p air o f s tone b uildings ( fig 4 6 .4 ); t he m ore e asterly was 5 .8m wide b y a t l east 2 8 .2m l ong . A s tone p artition s urvived 1 2m f rom t he n orth e nd a nd a f ragment o f a nother l ay 7 m f urther s outh . T his b uilding was v ery p oorly c onstructed a nd a l ine o f p osts was n eeded t o s upport t he r oof . T he western b uilding was s imilar a nd was s eparated f rom t he o ther b y a n a lleyway 1 .2m wide . I t was s uggested t hat p ossibly p art o f t he west b uilding which h ad a d rain was f or h ousing m ules a nd t he r emainder was f or s torage
( Jarrett
1 976,
3 9) .
O f t he t hree m asonry b uildings f ound within t he f ort a t R ichborough , t wo a re b asically o f t he s ame p lan - s ites V II a nd I V ( fig 4 9 .13). T hey c onsist o f a r ectangular s tructure with a v eranda o r p orch t owards t he r oad . I n b oth c ases t he r elationship o f t he ' veranda' t o t he m ain s tructure i s n ot c lear - i t n eed n ot b e c ontemporary . S ite V II i s t he l arger b uilding, b eing 1 5.96 b y 9 .1m; n o i ndication o f d ividing walls o r w ooden p artitions was f ound . T he walls were 7 6cm t hick, o f c halk b locks s et i n mortar o n a 1 5cm f oundation o f b roken c halk c apped b y 7 .5cm o f m ortar s trengthened b y 1 5cm d iameter a nd 9 1cm l ong p iles . I t would s eem t o d ate t o t he l ater t hird c entury . T he 2 .87m 1 949 ,
wide 7 5) .
v eranda o verlies t he p eriod I II r oad m etalling ( Bushe-Fox T he s pace e nclosed b y t he walls o f t he b ulding o n s ite I V
w as p acked with r ammed c halk r esting o n a l ayer o f waterworn f lints . T he purpose o f t hese b uildings i s unclear - t he e xcavator s uggested t hat t hey m ay h ave b een t emples ( Bushe-Fox 1 932B, 3 2) . A lthough t he i nternal p lan o f t he l ater t hird-century S axon S hore f orts s eems t o h ave b een haphazard, a t l east a t R ichborough a nd P ortchester r oads w ere l aid o ut .
A t t he f ormer s ite ,
a wide m etalled
r oad l ed f rom t he e ast g ate t o meet a nother r oad r unning a cross t he f ront o f t he ' principia' a nd a path l ed t o t he n orth p ostern . A t P ortchester a r oad r unning n orth f rom t he s outh g ate was f ound a nd b ranch r oads
r unning o ff
i t a t
r ight a ngles .
Within t he f orts o f C aernarvon, C aersws a nd R ibchester, l arge a reas s eem t o h ave r emained u noccupied f or p art o f t he t hird c entury . A t C aernarvon m uch o f t he p raetentura s eems t o h ave r emained u noccupied a t t his t ime ( Casey a nd D avies 1 978) . O n s ite X XI b y t he n orth-east g ate , t he s tone b uilding w as d emolished i n t he s econd c entury a nd n ot r eplaced u ntil t he
l ate f ourth
c entury
( Wheeler
1 924 ,
8 8 ) .
With
t he
d emolition o f t he t imber b arracks i n t he r etentura a t C aersws t hey were n ot r eplaced ( Daniels, J ones G . a nd P utnam 1 967, 6 5). A t R ibchester , t he n orth-east q uarter o f t he f ort w as a pparently c overed b y ar ough g ravel p avement i n t he e arly t hird c entury, l aid o ver t he e arlier,
p robably w ooden b arracks
( Atkinson
1 928 ,
2 0 ) .
T he d evelopment o f t hird-century m ilitary d efences i n B ritain f orms a r easonably c oherent p attern . W ithin t he p eriod f rom S eptimius S everus t o D iocletian, t he s tructure o f R oman f ort d efences was r adically a ltered . T his c hange c an b e t raced t hrough t he f orts o f B rancaster , P iercebridge a nd R eculver t o t he f orts o n t he S axon S hore o f l ater t hird-century d ate . A lthough s ome o f t hese l ate f orts s till s how s ome f amiliarity w ith e arlier c astrametation , b y t he t ime t he l atest f orts i n t he s eries were c onstructed, t he c hange had b een c omplete . T he l ater S axon S hore f orts a re i n t he mainstream o f military d efensive a rchitecture a nd t hey have many c lose p arallels with
3 1
c ontemporary f ortifications t o
n ote
t hat
t he
o n t he C ontinent
c ontemporary
p resumably d esigned
t o c ombat
c ontrast
i n
a ll t hose o f d iscussion
t he
d ifferent
i nternal p lans
t roop
i t
i s i nteresting
O udenburg
o f
d esign,
i n
a ccommodation
b eing
t he l ater S axon
e arlier d ate i s v ery a pparent .
o f
( though
a t
Belgium,
t he s ame t hreat a s t he S axon S hore f orts
i n Britain, were o f t otally t imber ( Mertens 1 977, 5 7). T he
d efences
I t
within
o f
e arth
a nd
S hore f orts a nd
m ay b e well t o s uspend
t hese
l ate
f orts
u ntil
t he
e arly f ourth-century a ccommodation i n t he f orts o f t he n orth a nd w est has b een d escribed. I t i s n ot v alid t o c ompare l ate t hird-century h uts with e arlier t hird-century b arrack-blocks were
i n
u se a t
t he s ame
s till b e u sed i f t he
e arly
t ime .
t hey were s erviceable .
f ourth
c entury,
s imply b ecause
B arrack-blocks
when a t
o f
t hey
e arlier t ype
w ould
T he c hanges b rought a bout i n
m any
s ites
t he b arrack-blocks
t otally r ebuilt, a re t he t rue c ounterparts o f t he b uildings within t he s outh a nd e ast c oast f orts .
l ate
w ere
t hird-century
I n t he n orth a nd west d uring t he t hird c entury, a lthough t here were s ome m odifications, a ll t he ' official' b uildings w ithin f orts s eem t o have r etained t heir o riginal u sage a nd
importance.
I n t he
n orth
t here a ppears t o b e a c ontradiction b etween t he a rchaeological evidence a nd t hat provided b y e pigraphy o n t he q uestion o f g arrison s ize . t wo I t
A t u nits
i s
t he f orts a re
p ossible
were i n f act u nits
a re
o f G reat C hesters,
r ecorded, t hat
p robably
t he
H igh R ochester a nd L anchester ,
d efinitely
i n
t he
t hird
t wo G ermanic ' irregular' u nits
t he s ame u nit
r ecorded
o r
( Gillam
1 979B,
e pigraphically
i n
1 14) .
t he
c entury .
a t H ousesteads
A t B irdoswald,
t hird
c entury,
t hree
t hough
i t
i s
p ossible t hat o nly t he c ohors I A elia D acorum was i n g arrison . T he c ohors I T hracum may s imply have b een h elping with building work. T he v enatores B annienses B ewcastle There
( e .g .
may
have
C hesterholm f ound
a t
a s
e ach o f
been
t here s ite
B urgh-by-Sands, o utposts
may h ave b elonged t o t he n eighbouring f ort a t
C owan a nd R ichmond F risian was
a t
( Gillam
H ousesteads
B ewcastle ,
i s
were p resent
o nly p rovable a t
f ort,
t he c ohors
3 37; a t
H ousesteads .
1 979B,
c f.
o r
1 15) .
T hree u nits
a nd R isingham a nd
t he
I N evana . 8 83
I n
n o
t o
c ase
f rom
t he
a t
t he
numerus
T he
c uneus
i t
a t
s ame
o f
a lso
t ime w ithin a f ort,
Maurorum
n eed
h ave h ad
t hough
A t t he
t his
l atter
i t r efers
B urgh-by-Sands
p ossible
Aurelianorum
have
t hat
a ll
b een
i n
t o a t ransfer ( Breeze
t hese
t han a n
s et
A t
up
an
p resumably o f
r ecorded
o n R IB
g arrison
t here .
o f
s omeone f rom
a nd D obson
t roops
A s n oted a bove,
m ay h ave b een a r eduction r ather
t he
1 235 in A D 2 13.
a c ohort t ribune,
n ot
a ccommodated within t hese f orts. there
a t
t hird-century
may
F risionum A ballavensium
P apcastle
t he u nit i s
a nd b een
a re a ttested
o ther
B urgh-by-Sands a nd R isingham.
B reeze a nd D obson s uggest t hat P apcastle
w are h as
I t i s l ikely t hat a t l east i n s ome c ases
i nscription whilst u nder t he c harge o f and
1 13 ) .
I V angionum a v exillatio R aetorum g aesatorum a nd
B urgh-by-Sands,
8 82
1 976,
Birdoswald
H ousesteads
e xploratores Habitacenses a re r ecorded o n R IB
c ohors
H assall
near
H igh R ochester a nd N etherby
t hree u nits i n g arrison. t hese u nits
1 935,
n umeri
c ould
1 976 .
2 46 ).
h ave
b een
a t C hesterholm
i ncrease
i n t he
amount
a ccommodation p resent .
Mr . P .
B idwell d ates
t he p rovision o f
t he b uildings with p robably o nly
s ix c ontubernia t o a round AD 2 40 . I t i s v ery l ikely t hat a t t his t ime t he c ohors I V G allorum was s till i n g arrison . T he a bandonment o f
t he v icus d uring t he t hird c entury make i t
3 2
d ifficult t o s uggest
t hat
s ome o f
s ome o f
t he t roops
l ived o utside
t he f ort .
I t i s p ossible t hat
t he v icani were l iving i n t he f ort b y t he e nd o f
t he t hird
c entury . I t h as b een s uggested t hat t he S everan b uilding o verlying t he via quintana a t B irdoswald r eflects t he n eed f or more a ccommodation w ithin t he f ort ( Richmond 1 931, 1 28) . O n t he c ontrary, t he p lacing o f t his b uilding o n a d ifferent a lignment f rom t he o thers i n t he f ort w ould h ave t ended t o waste s pace r ather t han m ake t he m ost u se o f i t. N o d oubt t he importance o f t he v ia q uintana l apsed with t he b uilding o f t he S tone W all which j oined t he f ort a t i ts n orthern a ngles. T he military way would t hen have b een a ble t o u tilise t he p ortae principales. R ampart b uildings, where t heir f unction i s k nown, s eem t o h ave b een u sed f or i ndustrial a ctivities o r u sed t o h ouse b read o vens . E . B irley s uggested, t hough t here i s n o a ctual e vidence, t hat t hese a dditional u nits were b rought o nto t he Wall t o a ct a s milecastle g arrisons ( Birley E . 1 932A, 2 13), t hough i t s eems u nlikely t hat t he m embers o f a c uneus were s o u sed . T he p resence o f a c uneus a t L anchester w ould a lso p resent a d ifficulty . I n t he o utpost f orts s ome o f t he u nits would n o d oubt s pend m uch o f
t heir t ime p atrolling ,
a s
t he n ame e xploratores s uggests . F rom t he a rea o f J edburgh, t wo a ltars h ave b een f ound , o ne R IB 2 117 r ecording a d etachment o f R aeti G aesati , t he o ther R IB 2 118 r ecording t he c ohors I V ardullorum . P robably b oth u nits were f rom H igh R ochester, t hough D r. G . Webster t hinks t hese i nscriptions s uggest t he p resence o f a f ort i n t he i mmediate v icinity . T hese i nscriptions a re o f a n o fficial t ype s imilar t o t hose a ssociated w ith t he p arade g rounds a t M aryport a nd B irdoswald . T he s uggestion o f P rofessor Mann's t hat v exillations o f c ohortes a nd a lae were s ent t o r einforce t he C ontinental a rmies a nd t hat t heir p lace w as t aken b y n umeri a nd c unei i s u nlikely . S ome o f t hese u nits a re known t o b e p resent e arly i n t he t hird c entury . T here i s n o e vidence f rom v ici f or t he p resence o f military s tructures o ther t han b ath-houses a t t his d ate . T he s o-called m arried q uarters a t C hesterholm a re u nlikely t o h ave s erved a s b arracks ( Breeze a nd D obson 1 976, 1 39); t hey a re n ow d ated t o c irca A D 1 40 when t here m ay h ave b een n o f ort o n t he s ite . I f o ne s uggests t hat s ome o f t he f ort g arrisons m ust h ave l ived o utside t he f ort, t hen t heir a ccommodation i s i ndistingishable f rom t hat o f t he c ivilian v icani . I t h as l ong b een t hought t hat t he d ecision o f S everus t o a llow s erving s oldiers t o l ive w ith w omen ( Herodian I II 8 5) r esulted i n s oldiers l iving o utside t he w alls . " The m ajor c hange i n t he l ife o f t he vicus a nd c ertainly a p rime c ause o f i ts e xpansion was t he p ermission g ranted b y S eptimius S everus f or s oldiers t o l ive with t heir f amilies i n h ouses o utside t he f ort" ( Salway 1 958, 2 38). S alway s uggests t hat t he g rowth o f v ici r ound many m ilitary e stablishments " well b efore S everus s uggests m ost s trongly t hat e ven w here b arrack a ccommodation was p rovided , m any s oldiers w ere p ermitted t o l ive o utside t he f ort w alls" ( Salway 1 967, 3 1) . H e a lso s uggests t hat
t he
m ovement
o f v ici o n t he W all c lose u p
p artly f rom a d esire t he f orts . v ici t hough w ould
t o
t he f orts
r esulted
t o h ave t he t roops q uartered i n t he v ici c lose t o
T here i s n o a ctual e vidence t hat s oldiers d id l ive i n i t
w ould b e d ifficult
t ake .
3 3
t he
t o e nvisage what f orm t his e vidence
C HAPTER 3
T HE A RCHAEOLOGICAL E VIDENCE F OR T HE H ISTORY O F F ORTS I N T HE L ATER T HIRD C ENTURY
A n umber o f s ites o n t he Wall a nd i n i ts h interland h avc been e xcavated r ecently a nd i n e nough d etail f or u s t o b e a ble t o i nfer a probable history o f t hese f orts i n t he l ater t hird c entury. Unfortunately, a ll t hese f orts h ave o nly b een p artly e xcavated a t p resent . T here i s a lways t he p roblem a s t o w hether t he c onclusions d rawn f rom t he e xcavation o f p art o f a s ite c an b e u sed t o d etermine t he h istory o f t he whole s ite . A lthough o ur e vidence i s l imited i n t his way a nd will r emain s o f or a g ood many y ears, i t i s a t l east worth while t o e xamine t he e vidence f rom t hese f orts a nd r each c onclusions, a lbeit v ery t entative o nes, a s t o t he history o f t he p articular f ort c oncerned , a nd p erhaps o f t he whole n orthern f rontier . A n a ttempt w ill b e m ade n ot t o u se t he e vidence f rom o ne f ort t o write t he h istory o f a nother.. S uch c hronological f rameworks a s t he Wall p eriods s hould o nly b e d eemed a pplicable t o t he h istory o f a l arge n umber o f f orts, i f i t c an b e s hown t hat t here i s a c orrelation b etween t he a rchaeological e vidence f rom a f air p roportion o f f orts c oncerned .
t he
I n t he p ast i t h as b een h eld a valid a ssumption
t hat t he e vidence f rom o ne e xcavated ( or p artly e xcavated) f ort c an b e u sed t o p rovide i nformation a bout t he p eriods a nd s tyle o f o ccupation a t an eighbouring u nexcavated f ort. S ome f orts o n e xcavation have been immediately placed i nto t he excavators' pre-conceived c hronological f ramework, i rrespective o f t he a rchaeological e vidence r ecovered .
T he
history
o f
a f ort
c an
o nly
b e
a scertained
b y
e xcavation a t t hat f ort . T here a re o f c ourse o bvious e xceptions t o t his. T he d ate o f c onstruction o f many o f t he f orts a ssociated with H adrian's W all w as a lways p resumed t o b e H adrianic a nd where t ested t his h as p roved t o b e s o. L ater i n t he R oman p eriod, however, p resumptions m ay n ot b e v alid a nd c an b e v ery m isleading .
s uch
T he r eport o f J arrett's e xcavations a t Maryport i n 1 966 makes a r efreshing c hange a s h e a ttempts t o i nterpret t he s ite without a ny p re-conceived n otions o f i ts h istory . T here i s n o a ttempt t o r elate t he s tructural l ayers t o t he Wall p eriods o f C ollingwood a nd B irley . H e t hus p roduced a h istory f or t hat f ort w hich i s a t p resent u nique t o i tself
a nd
we
a re
n ot
a ble
t o
f it
i t
i nto
t he
o verall s cheme
o f
p resumed e vents. F or m ost o f t he p eriod w ith which t his s tudy i s c oncerned , t he a rchaeological e vidence i s t he s ole i nformation we h ave r elating t o a s ite ; i t i s t herefore a dvisable n ot t o d isregard i t i n f avour o f a modern i nterpretation o f what a f ort's history was b y a nalogy
w ith
R oman p eriod ,
u ncertain
e vidence
f rom a nother
f ort
w hich
h ave h ad a t otally u nconnected h istory .
3 4
m ay ,
i n
t he
The sites here discussed are grouped under four headings. Within each they are recorded alphabetically. These groupings have no particular significance but are used merely for convenience. The Wall, the Cumbrian Coast and the Outposts Bewcastle - This fort is the only one known where there may be evidence for enemy destruction at this time. Since the excavations at Birdoswald in 1929 , it has generally been assumed that there was widespread destruction in the north in the late third century as a result of the removal of much of the W all garrison to fight for Carausius and Allectus against the Central Empire. An invasion from the north was envisaged circa AD 296 coinciding with the invasion by Asclepiodotus and Constantius Chlorus in the south in that year. Gradually the archaeological evidence for this destruction has been observed to be totally lacking at every site where it has been suggested except Bewcastle. Here the excavators of 1937 examined the latera praetorii and parts of the defences. The evidence for destruction was found in the The lower 1.2m sunken strongroom within the aedes of the principia. of both compartments of the strongroom were choked with a mass of rubbish which had fallen through the burnt floor of the aedes above. The destructive fire had followed upon looting and the contents of the Thirteen coins dating to between AD 268 strongroom had disappeared. and 273 were scattered over the sanded floor. '�he stone base for a life-sized imperial statue lacked the valuable bronze which had been roughly broken out of its socket. Half of the iron thunderbolt from the sanctified emperor's hand, part of two bronze letters, seven iron ferules from oak shaft for spea=s or flag poles , one iron arrow head and a broken piece of pole or shaft sheathed in thin bronze, attest a reckless smashing of the sacred appointments" (Richmond, Hodgson, St. Joseph, 1938, 208). There was also in the rubble two silver plaques of Coccidius torn from some rich votive furniture and a number of broken pots, many of the sherds of which were widely scattered. Mr. R. Jones has recently suggested that this need not represent enemy destruction as the garrison may simply have been discarding official paraphernalia of the old military·system which was no longer needed in the strongroom which itself was not now needed (cf. Mr. P. Austen in the forthcoming report on his excavations at Bewcastle ). The bulk of the coins found below the rubble in the strongroom are of A number of these coins show the Tetrici, some of which are copies. considerable wear. The excavators suggested that the destruction must have taken place a considerable time after AD 273 and hence dated it to the troubles of AD 296 or soon after. In the late third century in Britain, there was a great rarity of coins belonging to the legitimate emperors from Aurelian to Numerianus and Carinus. · There seems to have been resistance to the new coins which resulted from Aurelian's coin reforms and it has been suggested that this was the result of an unfavourable rate of exchange (Shiel 1977, 186 ). The masses of coins of the Gallic Empire and of the Central Empire prior to Aurelian no doubt sufficed for many years. The absence of coins of the period circa AD 273 -286 therefore need have no relevance to
35
t he o ccupation o f a s ite . T he a bsence o f c oins o f C arausius a nd A llectus s hould b e s ignificant a s c oins o f t hese u surpers a re c ommon a s s ite f inds i n t his c ountry.
T hey a re c ommon i n t he W all area a t
t he c ivil s ites o f C orbridge a nd S outh S hields a nd, p rovided t hat a s ufficient n umber o f c oins h ave b een r ecorded f rom t he s ites c oncerned, t heir a bsence f rom B ewcastle a nd o ther f orts o n t he Wall s hould imply t hat u nder t he ' British Empire' t hese f orts were a bandoned . T he c oins o f t he G allic Empire m ay h ave b een d emonetized b y C arausius; 1 974A, 4 5).
m any o f h is c oins a re o verstruck o n t hese i ssues ( Casey H owever, t here were s till c oins o f t he Gallic Empire
a round i n t he e arly f ourth c entury; o f t he 2 0 c oins f rom p eriod I II a t B irdoswald, t hree a re o f t his t ype ( Richmond a nd Birley E . 1 930, 1 74). A p eriod o f a bandonment i s a lso s uggested a t t his f ort by t he f ormation o f a marsh i n t he h ollow t o t he s outh o f t he p rincipia , a bove t he well-built t hird-century b uildings b ut s ealed b y e arly f ourth-century s tructures . I n t he n orth-west c orner o f t he f ort, n ew buildings t hought t o h ave b een e rected i n t he l ate t hird c entury ( Austen 1 978A) p robably d ate t o much e arlier i n t he t hird c entury ( pers. c omm. Mr. P . Austen).
I f t here was a p eriod o f a bandonment
f ollowing a n e nemy d estruction h ere , t he i nternal b ath-house d oes s eem t o h ave b een a ffected ( Gillam 1 954) .
n ot
B irdoswald I n 1 929 a n i nscription ( RIB 1 912) was f ound h ere r e-used i n t he f loor o f a l ate f ourth-century b uilding ( Richmond a nd B irley E . 1 930) . I t r ecorded t hat t he p raetorium , w hich h ad b een c overed with e arth a nd had f allen i nto r uin, a nd t he p rincipia a nd balneum were r estored
a t
s ome unspecified
d ate b etween A D
2 96
and
3 05 .
T he
p robable meaning o f t his i nscription has b een d iscussed e lsewhere ( Welsby 1 980). T here i s n o r eason f or n ot t aking i t l iterally a nd, i f t his i s a ccepted, t hen t here was a s ituation here w here t he a dministrative c entre o f t he f ort h ad s uffered n eglect, t he c ommanding o fficer's h ouse had c eased t o e xist, a nd t he b ath-house Which i s u sually t hought o f a s a military b uilding) was i n d isrepair . I t c annot b e p roved t hat t he whole f ort was a bandoned o n t his e vidence , but i t i s c ertainly p ossible . I n t he e xcavations o f t he l ate 1 920s a nd 1 930s, n o c lear a rchaeological e vidence w as n oted within t he f ort f or a p eriod o f a bandonment ( cf. G illam 1 974B, 1 3), t hough R ichmond, r easoning f rom t he e pigraphic e vidence b efore t he i dea o f t he n ew Wall p eriods h ad b een f ormulated , s uggested " this implies an o ccupation l asting a t l east t ill 2 73 , f ollowed p erhaps b y s uch d isuse a s b efell t he p raetorium" ( Richmond a nd B irley E . 1 930, 1 72). There i s n ow e pigraphic e vidence f or t he p resence o f t he c ohors I A elia D acorum i n t he f ort u nder P robus ( Wright 1 961, 1 94) . T he n orth g uardchamber o f t he p orta p rincipalis d extra was i n r uins a t s ome t ime i n t he t hird c entury . d erelict
I t w as t hought g uardchamber
t hat a t ile k iln h ad b een i nserted i nto
( Gillam
1 950 ,
6 6),
b ut
Mr .
J .P .
G illam
t he
i nforms
me t hat t his may not have been t he c ase and he suggests t he p ossibility o f ah ypocausted r oom o r ab read o ven within t he r uined c hamber .
T his i nserted s tructure h ad g one o ut o f u se i n t he l ate
t hird c entury a nd i t i s v ery l ikely t hat t he r uined g uardchamber was r ebuilt i n t he e arly f ourth c entury . N o r eal e vidence h as b een f ound t o i ndicate t hat t he e nd o f B irdoswald p eriod I I ( and Wall p eriod I I) must d ate c lose t o A D 2 96; i t was t hought u nacceptable t hat t here c ould h ave b een a p eriod o f a bandonment, h ence t he e nd o f p eriod I I h ad t o b e f ollowed i mmediately b y t he r ebuilding r ecorded o n R IB
3 6
1 912 .
B owness-on-Solway
T here s eems t o b e n o e vidence f rom t he e xcavations
o f 1 973 ( Potter 1 975) t o s ubstantiate t he c laim t hat t he p hase I II b uilding ( built i n t he f irst half o f t he t hird c entury) b y t he west g ate " was e ither d emolished o r f ell i nto r uin, f ootings r emain" ( Daniels 1 978A , 2 57). P otter
s o t hat r ecords
o nly i ts a t imber
b uilding a t t he e nd o f t he p hase I II b arrack-block which i s d efinitely l ater t han t hat b uilding's c onstruction . H e s uggests i t m ay h ave f ormed a l ean-to s tructure . Much o f o ne wall o f t he b arrack-block would have h ad t o b e s tanding. T he d ate o f t he l ean-to b uilding i s u nclear - i t may b e o f l ate f ourth-century d ate ( Potter 1 974, 4 0) o r p ost R oman . I n r ecent e xcavations i n t he n orth-eastern p ortion o f t he f ort ( Potter 1 979A) t here a ppears t o h ave b een a l ong p eriod o f a bandonment f rom t he l ate s econd i nto t he f ourth c entury, t hough t he p resence o f t hird a nd f ourth-century pottery a ttests o ccupation s omewhere i n t he a rea . C arrawburgh
I t i s p ossible t hat a t t his s ite we have e vidence f or
o ccupation o f t he f ort a nd v icus
i n t he l ate t hird c entury .
W hen t he
b ath-house was d ug b y C layton i n 1 873 ( Bruce 1 874) two c oins were f ound " between two s tones o f t he main wall a nd n ear i ts f oundations were t wo c oins u nworn b y c irculation a nd p erfectly f resh, o ne o f C laudius G othicus, t he o ther o f C laudius T acitus" . T his s hould b e i nterpreted a s e vidence f or r ebuilding s oon a fter A D 2 76 n ot AD 3 00 ( Daniels 1 978A . 1 27). I t i s l ikely t hat t his r ebuilding would have b een c arried o ut b y t he military. O n t he p eriod I II f loor o f t he mithraeum l ay s lightly worn c oins o f V ictorinus, C laudius I I a nd T acitus with a f resh f ollis o f Maximianus ( Richmond a nd G illam 1 951, 3 4) which m ay s uggest t he c ontinued u se o f t he b uilding a t t his t ime . I n t he d eposit
o f
c oins f rom C onventtna d' s Well
a s ignificant n umber o f
c oins
o f
( Clayton 1 866) t here i s
t he C entral Empire
o f
t he p eriod A D
2 70-236 a s well a s a f air n umber o f C arausian a nd Allectan c oins. C oventina's Well was n o d oubt a r eligious s hrine o f m ore t han p urely l ocal importance . T he p resence o f t hese c oins i n t he w ell d oes n ot n ecessarily imply t hat t here was a l arge r esident p opulation a t C arrawburgh i n t his p eriod t hough, t aken with t he e vidence a bove, t here i s t he p ossibility o f a c ontinued m ilitary a nd c ivil o ccupation o f t his s ite . E xcavations within t he f ort f ound n o c lear e vidence f or a n a bandonment ( Breeze 1 972) t hough a t s ome p eriod l ater t han t he e arly t hird c entury, a b arrack a nd a n eighbouring b uilding i n t he p raetentura h ad b een r eplaced b y a b uilding o n a d ifferent a lignment . C astlesteads T he c oin l ist f rom t he f ort c ompiled b y C ollingwood c onsists o f 9 9 e xamples. T here i s a marked l ack o f i ssues o f t he ' Gallic Empire' , o nly o ne o f V ictorinus b eing r ecorded; n or a re t here a ny o f t he u sually c ommon c oins o f C laudius I I, y et t here a re two o f C arausius . ( Coins o f C laudius I I m ay o nly h ave r eached t his c ountry a fter A D
2 73 when A urelian
r e-united
t he
Western
P rovinces
with
t he
E mpire). C ollingwood wrote: " We know t hat a bout 2 70 t he Wall was o vertaken a fter a p eriod o f p eace b y ad isaster; a nd t he c oin s eries s uggests t hat
a t
C astlesteads t his d isaster was f or s ome t wenty y ears n ot m ade
g ood" . H e b elieved t hat t he f ort may have b een b rought b ack i nto c ommission b y C arausius ( Collingwood 1 922B, 2 20-1) . C hesterholm T he d ating evidence f or t he f ort a nd vici h ere i s v ery problematical. All t he published material on t he s ite i s i nconsistent w ith r egard t o i ts c hronology .
E .
B irley d ated t he
s tructures
f ound
i n
t he
1 930s
b y
t he Wall p eriods,
o ften o n v ery
l ittle a rchaeological e vidence . R . B irley b egan d ating t he s ame s cheme b ut h as g radually f ound t his u ntenable .
t he v ici b y H is r evised
d ating o f t he v ici, h owever, has varied widely o ver t he l ast d ecade a nd i t i s h ence v ery d ifficult a t t his s tage t o d iscuss t he h istory o f t he s tone f orts a nd t he v ici h ere . C ertain ' facts' d o s eem t o b e e stablished .
T here was a p eriod o f
a bandonment b etween v icus I a nd I I. T here i s a marked l ack o f f ourth-century c oinage f rom t he v icus a rea . R . B irley m aintains t hat o n t he e vidence o f a hoard o f c oins, t he l atest o f which d ates t o A D 2 70, v icus I I was p robably a bandoned s oon a fter t hat d ate . l atest c oins i n t he h oard were d eposited s oon a fter A D 2 70 . h oard l ay i n t he l ast o ccupation l ayer o f t he v icus I I b uilding, XXIXB ( Birley R . 1 977, 2 5-6). T he o ccupation o f v icus I I may
T he T he s ite n ot
h ave e nded s uddenly c irca AD 2 70, b ut i t c ould n ot have c ontinued i n u se much i nto t he f ourth c entury . I t may i n f act have b een i n d ecline t hroughout t he t hird c entury a nd t he a pparent p eak i n t he c oin l ist u nder t he G allic Empire may b e t he r esult o f a d ispersed hoard ( pers. c omm . Mr. P . B idwell). P rior t o t he d iscovery o f t he h oard n oted a bove, i t had b een t hought t hat v icus I I b egan c irca AD 2 70, a fter t he v icus a rea h ad b een u noccupied f or p erhaps 2 5 years. V icus I i s n ow d ated t o c irca A D 1 40 , i .e . b efore t he p eriod I s tone f ort c ame i nto e xistence p robably O n
c irca A D
1 63
( see A ppendix I ) .
t he n umismatic e vidence t he v icus
t hird e xtent
c entury we
c an
a nd
f or
i nfer
much t he
o f
a rea was
a bandoned
t he f ourth c entury.
history
o f
t he
f ort
f rom
i n
t he
l ater
Q uite t o what t hat
o f
i ts
a ssociated v icus i s u nclear. E ither we would e xpect t hat o n t he a bandonment o f t he v icus t he v icani m oved i nto t he f ort, o r t hat t he f ort g arrison a nd t he v icani, who must h ave r elied heavily o n t he g arrison f or t heir e conomic e xistence , w ere m oved o ut . N o e vidence f or a n a bandonment o f t he b uldings i n t he n orth-eastern p raetentura o f t he f ort was f ound i n t he r ecent e xcavations i n t hat a rea . T he n umerous l ate t hird a nd f ourth-century c oins s uggest c ontinued o ccupation o f t he f ort f rom t he mid-third i nto t he f ourth c entury. T he t hird-century b uildings r emained i n u se i nto t he middle o f t he f ollowing c entury, t hough b uilding I A was r ebuilt t o as imilar p lan a nd b uildings I IA a nd I IIA were e xtensively a ltered a t s ome d ate a fter A D
2 70
( Bidwell
G reat C hesters
1 981,
3 23-4) .
O n t he e xcavation o f
t he e xternal b ath-house ,
h oard was f ound r esting o n t he f loor o f
a c oin
t he h ypocaust b asement i n o ne
o f t he r ooms . T he e xcavator b elieved t hat t he c oins h ad b een p laced o n t he s uspensura a nd h ad f allen i nto t he b asement when t he f loor h ad c ollapsed ( Gibson 1 930B, 5 1). T he c oins, o f which o ver 1 00 were f ound , e nded w ith i ssues o f V alerian , G allienus, P ostumus, C laudius I I a nd Q uintillus . was d eposited .
T he b uilding m ust h ave b een d isused when t he h oard T he b uilding a lso c ontained p ortions o f a h uman s kull
a nd b ones a nd t he e xcavator t hought t hat t he h uman b ones were t hose o f p ersons who h ad p erished d uring t he d estruction o f t he b uilding ! H altonchesters N o e vidence f or t he l ate R oman p eriod was f ound when t he p raetentura was e xcavated ; a ll t he l ater l evels h ad b een r emoved b y p loughing ( Simpson F . and R ichmond 1 937). T he r est o f t he f ort
3 8
s outh o f t he Military R oad had f ared much b etter .
J arrett t hought
t hat he f ound e vidence f or a ll f our Wall p eriods ( Jarrett 1 959), a s d id Gillam i n 1 960 ( Gillam 1 961). I n t he f ollowing year's e xcavations, h owever , G illam n oticed t hat t he s upposed p eriods I II a nd IV s tructures were mutually e xclusive ( Gillam 1 962) a nd t heir c ontemporaneity c ould b e e stablished . U nder o ne o f t hese b uildings J arrett h ad f ound a s herd o f C rambeck p archment w are which s hould d ate t o t he l ater f ourth c entury . G illam c oncluded t hat t here h ad b een n o C onstantian r econstruction o n t he s ite . I n t he l ate t hird c entury, t he f ort had b een a bandoned a nd e verywhere o verlying t he p eriod I I s tructures w as a l ayer o f e arth u p t o 4 00mm t hick w here b uildings " had b een c overed with e arth a nd h ad f allen i nto r uins" . T he d ate o f t his a bandonment c annot b e f ixed p recisely - s ome d ate a fter A D 2 73 s eems l ikely . T he g ranary was d estroyed b y f ire a t t he e nd o f p eriod I I . I t c ould h ave b een b urnt b y t he d eparting g arrison, t hough Mr. G illam n ow s uggests t hat t his o f his p eriod I c irca A D 1 80 . H ousesteads
A t
t his
f ire i s
m ore
l ikely t o d ate t o
s ite we k now f rom e xcavations
t hat
t he e nd
t here w as
a
m arked c hange i n t he g arrison a ccommodation i n t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury, which has s uggested t o s ome a p eriod o f a bandonment p rior t o t his c hange . S uch a r ebuilding p rogramme would h ave n ecessitated t he d emolition o f m uch o f t he t hird-century b arrackb locks. T hat t hey were a lready i n s uch a b ad s tate o f r epair a s t o b e unusable b y t he l ate t hird c entury, a nd t hat t his p rompted t he b uilding o f v ery d ifferent s tructures i s a n a ttractive h ypothesis. T here i s, h owever, n o e vidence f rom t hese b uildings f or a p eriod o f d isuse a t t his t ime .
T here a re n o a ccumulations o f
e arth b etween
p eriod I I a nd I II s tructures. T he s outh wall o f t he p eriod I I b arrack-block , b uilding X III , was r e-used b y t he f ourth-century c halet b uilders , t hough t o what h eight i t w as t hen s tanding i s u nknown . A t l east t he b arrack-block h ad n either b een t otally d emolished n or h ad f allen d own c ompletely . W hen b uilding X IV was e xcavated , t he i dea o f a p eriod o f a bandonment was n ot c onsidered ( Wilkes 1 960 ; 1 961) . I n t he e xcavation o f b uilding X III, t he a rchaeological e vidence f or d isuse o f t he s tructure was s ought, b ut was n ot f ound, t hough a bandonment o f t he f ort w as s till t hought t o h ave o ccurred ( Gillam a nd D aniels 1 976). I n b uilding XV , t he " barrack-block" was t hought t o h ave b een r eplaced i n t he e arly t hird c entury b y what was p resumably a s tore b uilding . T he e xcavators n oted t hat n umerous c oins t rodden i nto
t he c racks i n t he s tone f lagged f loor o f
l ate t hird a nd e arly
f ourth-century d ate i ndicated c ontinuous u se w ell i nto t he f irst h alf o f t he f ourth c entury ( Leach a nd Wilkes 1 962, 8 9). E xcavations i n t he e astern e nd o f t his b uilding i n 1 981 s uggested t hat t he p eriod I II s tructure m ay i n f act d ate t o t he l ate t hird c entury o r l ater . I n a d rain w hich was s ealed b y t he m ake-up f or t he p eriod I II f loor , W ilkes f ound
t wo
c oins o f
t he T etrici .
N o e vidence f or a bandonment ( Charlesworth 1 975; 1 976).
w as f ound i n t he p raetorium o r h ospital C oins o f t he ' British Empire' h ave b een
f ound o n t he s ite . I n t he e xcavations o f 1 898 ( Bosenquet 1 904 ) o ne A llectus i s s pecified a s c oming f rom t he f ort . Two c oins o f C arausius a re a lso r ecorded a nd i n 1 960 o ne o r t wo c oins o f A llectus w ere f ound . B oon s uggests t hat " almost a ll t he c irculatory c oinage o f t he B ritish u surpers w as s wept a way b y t he c entral g overnment w hen t he i sland was r ecaptured - s carcely a p iece o ccurs i n l ater s ite f inds" . T hough h e b elieves t hat c oins o f A llectus ( perhaps b ecause
3 9
t hey were m ore r egular i n s hape t han t hose o f t he e arlier C arausian c oins) were a pparently a l ittle m ore c ommon a s l ate s urvivals ( Boon 1 974 , f n 1 36) . A c oin o f P robus was f ound i n t he p raetorium b ut t his was s ecurely s tratified with c oins o f t he f irst h alf o f t he f ourth c entury .
3 1
b arbarous
r adiates
w ere
r ecovered
f rom b uilding X V a nd
t he presence o f s uch a l arge n umber o f t his t ype o f c oin implies u se o f t he b uilding i n t he p eriod b etween c irca A D 2 70 a nd 3 00 . T he n umismatic e vidence d oes n ot s upport t he i dea o f t he f ort's a bandonment a t t his t ime . I f
R IB
1 613 h as
b een c orrectly
r estored ,
t hen h ere w e p robably h ave a
b uilding i nscription o f D iocletian a nd Maximianus . s uggest
t hat
i t
r ecords
t he r ebuilding o f
I t
i s t empting t o
s ome m ajor s tructure within
t he f ort, a s d oes t he p ossibly s imilar i nscription f rom B irdoswald 1 912) . Two l arge C orinthian c olumn c apitals f rom H ousesteads a nd C hesters h ave b een d ated b y B lagg t o a fter t he m id-third c entury a nd
( R a
q uite p obsibly a s l ate a s t he f ourth c entury ( Blagg 1 981, 1 70). T hese p robably had b een u sed i n t he p rincipia o f t hese f orts a nd s uggest t hat s tructures.
t here
may
h ave
b een
e xtensive
r ebuilding
i n
t hese
F .G . S impson f ound e vidence o f a s erious a nd e xtensive wall c ollapse . B oth a ngle-towers o n t he s outh wall had t o b e s trengthened a nd t he o uter s ide o f t he f ort wall was r ebuilt a lmost f rom i ts f oundations f rom a p oint s outh o f t he e ast g ate r ound t o t he s outh g ate . T he wall a t t he s outh-east a ngle was widened, c ausing t he r ebuilding o f t he s ewer o utfall . A n ew wall was i nserted i nto e ach t ower d uring t he c ourse o f t hese widespread r epairs ( Simpson F . 1 976, 1 51). T he e xcavator d ated t his work e ither d uring t he t hird c entury o r e arly i n t he f ourth b ut D aniels s uggested t hat t his c ould b e a ttributed t o r epairs a fter g eneral n eglect i n t he l ate t hird c entury ( Daniels 1 978A , 1 47) . T he e xcavators o f b uilding X III were s urprised b y t he l arge n umber o f c oping s tones r e-used i n t he c halets o r s cattered a round t he s ite - f ew o f t hese a re s een r e-used i n o ther e xcavated s tructures within t he f ort. s tones
c ame
f rom t he t owers
Mr . C .M. D aniels s uggests o f
t hat t hese
t he g ates a nd t he a ngle a nd i nterval-
t owers - h ence t heir p reponderance i n t he b uilding w hich i s c lose t o t he n orth g ate a nd t he n orth-east a ngle . H e s uggests t hat i n t he l ater t hird c entury , s ome a t l east o f t he t owers o n t he f ort d efences w ere d ilapidated. MarypOrt T here a ppears t o h ave b een n o r ebuilding h ere i n t he e arly f ourth c entury. T he e xcavator i nferred t wo e qually p lausible c hronological s chemes f or t he s ite , b oth o f w hich i ndicate a p eriod o f c ontinuous u se o f b uildings f rom p ossibly u nder G ordian I II until c irca A D 3 60 o r l ater ( Jarrett 1 976 , 4 0-1) . N ewcastle u pon T yne
R ecent e xcavations h ave p rovided
evidence
f or
t he d ereliction o f t he small p art o f t he f ort e xamined. T his area was i n t he p raetentura w here a g ranary was f ound . P ottery e vidence d ates t his a bandonment t o t he s econd h alf o f t he t hird c entury . When t he s ite was r e-occupied, t he g ranary h ad b een d emolished o r had f allen d own a nd i ts l ower c ourses were o verlain b y a r oad s urface ( Harbottle R avenglass b uildings,
a nd
E llison
1 979) .
E xcavations
i n t he p raetentura r evealed f our p hases o f
c onstructed t hroughout
4 0
i n t imber, where t he s ame basic
l ayout
h ad
b een
m aintained
f rom H adrian i nto
t he
f ourth c entury.
O ccupation n ever c eased i n p hase I I , d ated c irca A D 1 90-210 t o A D 3 503 70, b ut a t s ome d ate b etween t he m id-third a nd t he mid-fourth c enturies, a f ire p robably d estroyed a ll t hree b arrack-blocks r evealed i n t he e xcavations. T hey were immediately r ebuilt ( Potter 1 979A), 4 9) . J arrett h as , h owever , s uggested t he p ossibility o f a bandonment h ere . O f t he 3 9 c oins f ound , o nly f our a re r adiates o f t he p eriod A D 2 59-75 a nd n one d ates b etween A D 2 75 a nd 2 94 ( Jarrett 1 980 , 4 32) . I t i s h azardous t o d raw c onclusions f rom s uch a s mall s ample . R isingham
R ichmond b elieved t hat t he s outh g ate's e ast t ower h ad
b een
u nder C onstantius
r ebuilt
C holorus
which
c ould p ossibly
i mply a
p eriod o f n eglect i n t he l ate t hird c entury . Whether t he r epair a ctually d ates t o t his p eriod i s u nclear. N o d ating e vidence was p ublished ( Richmond 1 936, 1 90). A t ombstone, R IB 1 253, was s et u p h ere i n A D 2 78. R udchester T his f ort a ppears t o have had a s imilar h istory i n t he l ate t hird a nd f ourth c entury - a nd i ndeed t hroughout i ts l ife - t o i ts n eighbour t o t he west, H altonchesters . E xcavations i n t he s outhe ast part o f t he f ort o n t he s outh e dge o f t he v ia q uintana r evealed t hat " at s ome d ate which c annot b e p recisely a scertained , t he r ebuilt a shlar b arrack ( of Wall p eriod I I) f ell i nto r uin a nd was n ever r ebuilt . A l ayer o f h umus o verlay i ts r emains .. . ." ( Gillam, H arrison a nd N ewman
1 973,
8 2) .
O nly a small a rea o f
e vidence a nd whether t he whole was c lear . h elp.
F or t he l ate t hird c entury ,
t he f ort h as y ielded t his
a bandoned a t
t his
t ime i s n ot
t he n umismatic e vidence
i s
o f n o
S outh S hields T he l ater h istory o f t his s ite i s d ifficult t o a scertain d ue t o t he a lmost t otal l ack o f a ny s tructure d ated t o a fter c irca A D 2 20 . T here i s s ufficient e vidence t o s how t hat, a t l east b y t he end o f t he t hird c entury, t he f ort had c eased t o b e h eld b y t he m ilitary . I n t he H adrianic d ouble g ranary t wo k ilns w ere i nserted , o ne o f which was n ever u sed whilst t he o ther was u sed e xtensively. T he p ottery a ssociated with t he l atter k iln d ated i t s ecurely t o c irca A D 3 00 . I t c an b e a ssumed t hat t he g ranary was i n d isrepair a t t his t ime
- i t
c ertainly was
n ot b eing u sed t o s tore g rain .
I t i s h ighly
u nlikely t hat s uch a s ituation would h ave e xisted w ithin a f ort s till o ccupied b y i ts u nit ( Gillam 1 974B , 1 4; c f . T empleborough , S impson G . 1 973, 8 8). T he e ast g uardchamber o f t he n orth g ate was a t s ome p eriod ( probably a fter c irca A D 2 20) c ompletely d emolished a nd , a fter s everal i nches o f r ubble h ad a ccumulated , a r ough b uilding was e rected o ver i t ( Breeze 1 968). I n t wo t renches c ut a cross t he i nner f ort d itch, t he i nner s lope o f t he d itch was c overed with s tones, a lmost c ertainly f allen f rom t he f ort wall. U nder t his material i n B aring S treet was p ottery d ating f rom c irca A D 2 00 t o 2 80 a nd a s ilver d enarius o f S eptimius S everus, A D 1 98 t o 2 00 ( Dore a nd G illam 1 979, 7 ). T he p resence o f much l ater p ottery o n t he s ite i ndicates t hat t he f ort wall must h ave b een i n d isrepair i n t he l ate t hird c entury. I f T he
i t h ad c ollapsed l ater i t would h ave c ertainly s ealed n umismatic e vidence
f rom
t he s ite
i s
a gainst
l ater p ottery .
i ts having b een
a bandoned a t t his p eriod. T he c oin s equence i s u nbroken, t hough C asey n oted t hat i t i s n ot c lear h ow many o f t he c oins known c ame e ither f rom t he v icus o r f rom t he f ort . T here a re a l arge n umber o f c oins
o f C arausius a nd A llectus.
4 1
Wallsend T he e xcavations h ere a re s till i n p rogress a nd h ence l ittle c an d efinitely b e s aid a bout t he f ort's h istory a t t he moment. I n t he p raetentura
t he b arracks
a nd
s tables
o f
t he s econd a nd t hird
c entury were d emolished probably i n t he l ater t hird c entury - a nd t he r ubble l evelled. Over t his a t s ome l ater d ate a n umber o f small b uildings, i rregularly l aid o ut, were b uilt a nd a t l east o ne i n t he western p raetentura ( which was b uilt o ver a n e arlier r oad s urface) s ealed d ark e arth b eneath i ts walls. I n t he e astern praetentura a b uilding c onstructed o f l arge, r ough b locks s at o n a c onsiderable a ccumulation o f e arth . A t t he t ime , Mr . C . M . D aniels d ismissed t his a s ap ost-Roman s tructure, b ut h e n ow c onsiders t hat i t c ould be o f R oman d ate . e vidence
f or
I n t he
r est
o f
t he f ort
t here
i s
a t present n o
r eal
t he a bandonment o f a ny p art o f i t .
M ilecastles a nd T urrets T here i s v irtually t o t he p roblems o f
n o e vidence f rom m ilecastles a nd t urrets r elating t he l ate t hird-century h istory o f t he W all . V ery
f ew m ilecastles h ave b een a dequately d ug a nd m ost o f t he t urrets t hat h ave b een e xcavated were a bandoned l ong b efore t his p eriod . O n t he c oin e vidence a t milecastle 4 8, P oltross B urn, t he e xcavators dated t he e nd o f t heir p eriod I I t o c irca A D 2 70 ( Gibson a nd S impson 1 911, 4 60) b ut t his d ate was d ismissed b y C ollingwood a nd Birley i n 1 930 . A c oin o f C arausius was f ound b y S impson i n m ilecastle 4 0 , W inshields . R ecent e xcavations o f m ilecastle 3 5, S ewingshields, s uggest t hat t he s ite may have b een very d ilapidated f or much o f t he l ater Roman p eriod .
B y t he l ate t hird c entury,
t he s outh g ate and m uch o f t he
s outh wall were c overed b y e arth a nd r ubble a nd a n arrow c obble p ath r an o ver t he s ite o f t he wall a l ittle t o t he e ast o f t he s outh g ate . A t t his t ime t he m ilecastle s ite would s eem t o h ave b een o ccupied b y a c ommunity o f m etal workers ( pers . c omm. Mr . M . S avage) . T he H interland o f H adrian's W all B ainbridge T here h ave b een a f air n umber o f p ublished e xcavations a t t his s ite s ince 1 928 , t hough t here i s s ome d ifficulty i n r econciling t he d ating s uggested b y t he v arious e xcavators. T here a re c ertain i ndications o f p eriods o f a bandonment o f s tructures within t he f ort; i t s eems t o have s een e xtensive r ebuilding u nder S everus, a nd t hereafter l ittle work s eems t o h ave o ccurred u ntil t he e arly f ourth c entury. A t s ome p eriod i n t he t hird c entury, t he f ort's e ast wall was.in t otal d isrepair o r had b een d emolished. T he f ort m ay have b een e xtended a t t his t ime a s a n i nscription r ecords t he c onstruction o f t he b racchium c aementicium ( RIB 7 22) u nder A lfenus S enecio ( Hartley 1 960 , 1 18 ). T hese f ort e xtension o r a nnex d efences s eem t o h ave b een i n d isrepair f or a t ime i n t he e arlier t hird c entury a s p eat was a llowed t o f orm i n t he n orth d itch a nd a d ead c ow was l eft l ying i n i t . H artley s uggested t hat t here was a p ossibility a t t hat t ime t hat t he f ort was a bandoned. T he ' annex' was h owever g iven a n ew wall i n t he t hird c entury w hich d id n ot f ollow t he l ine o f t he e arlier wall . T his was d ated b y Hartley t o t he mid o r l ate t hird c entury; t wo B B1 f langed b owls p rovided f ig 7 , N o. 5 5 a nd 5 6).
t he t erminus p ost q uem f or t his ( Hartley 1 960 T hese m ay h ave b een d ated t oo l ate a s t hey
c ould have b een o n t he market much e arlier i n t he t hird c entury ( Gillam 1 976 , 6 8 ) . A s t here was l ittle f ourth-century p ottery i n t he ' annex' , H artley b elieved t hat t he p eriod I I ' annex' wall d ated t o v ery
s oon a fter
t he
m id-third c entury .
4 2
T he f ort w as p rovided with a
n ew e ast wall a nd g ate, p robably i n t he e arly f ourth c entury, which w ould a ppear t o h ave b een b uilt with t he r e-used m asonry o f I I ' annex' wall. g ate was
i n
t he p eriod
T he e xcavators o f 1 931 f ound t hat t he e ast ' annex'
r uins
b efore
t he s econd
r oad
s urface was
l aid
t hrough
i t .
T hey d ated t his r oad s urface t o t he e arly f ourth c entury ( Droop a nd J ones 1 932, 2 4), t hough p erhaps more o n analogy with t he f ort's e ast g ate t han o n a rchaeological e vidence . Within t he f ort, b uilt
s ome o f t he b uildings i n t he praetentura had b een
o n a t hick r ubble l ayer.
I n t he s outh-east p art
o f
t he f ort,
W ade f ound a wall o f e xtremely p oor c onstruction r esting o n a mass o f r ubble a nd d irt 6 9cm t hick i n which was f ound a c oin o f C laudius I I ( Wade
1 955,
1 58) .
T he
b uilding p rior
t o
t his
h ad
a lso b een b uilt
o n
a l ayer o f r ubble c ontaining s econd a nd e arly-third c entury p ottery w hich c ould h ave b een a ssociated with a n a bandonment i n t he e arly t o m id-third
c entury n oted a bove.
Buildings i mmediately s outh o f t he
v ia praetoria i nside t he e ast g ate were b uilt o n d ebris,
a nd t heir
walls which had n o f oundations were s imilar t o t hose f ound b y Wade. T he excavators d ated J ones 1 932, 1 7).
t hese
A
i nscription
S everan
b uilding
f ourth-century l ate
r oadway
t o
o utside
t he e arly
t he
had
b een
e ast
g ate
t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury,
over
much
o f
p reponderance C arausius . t o h ave
t he
o f
I f
The
i n
t he
1 961) .
a nd
e arly I n
t he
series
i ssues
a nd
shows
i ncludes
t he t wo
i t
usual
c oins
O f
e xcavations
o f
t he
l arge
P roud
( Steer
n umber
a nd
1 938).
o f
S teer,
c oins
f rom
t here
i s
B rough-on-Humber d efences bears
t his
n one
C arausius
a nd
Wacher s uggested
t o b e p ublished.
t hat t he h istory o f t his s ite's
more r elation t o t hat o f a f ort
c apital o f
s ite f ound i n t he o f
C oins f rom t he r ecent e xcavations h ere may
w ell have c hanged t his p icture - t hey h ave y et
t he P arisi ,
w hich
t han t o t hat o f
t he
may h ave b een l ocated e lsewhere .
T here was p robably a numerus h ere i s t he e arly f ourth c entury, n umerus s upervenientium P etuariensium . t hrough
l ong
r ecruited W acher 2 90. t ime,
o f
i s u nlikely
l ong .
B inchester
c ivitas
r e-used ( Hartley
( Droop
t here was a d rastic r ebuilding
c oin
t hird-century
c entury
t here was a p eriod o f a bandonment h ere,
l asted
A llectus
s ite.
l ate
f ourth
a ssociation
f rom
t hat
with
p lace.
P etuaria
B rough
t he
I t p robably r eceived i ts t itle may
r ather h ave
t han
b een
having
a n aval
b een b ase.
d ated t he r ebuilding o f t he d efences i n s tone t o c irca A D 2 70T he c onstruction work s eems t o have b een halted f or a s hort t he work b eing r esumed i n t he l ast d ecade o f
c ompleted
t o a s lightly d ifferent
d esign .
t he c entury a nd
T he i ncomplete g uardroom o f
t he north g ate was d emolished a nd r eplaced b y another c ontemporary w ith t he a dded e xternal i nterval and g ate-towers. T he e xcavator s uggests a c lose a nalogy with B urgh C astle ( Wacher 1 969, 3 -4). B rough-on-Noe t his
s ite ,
t he
T hree l ater
p eriods
o f
o ccupation h ave b een i nferred o n
t wo a ssociated with
t he
s tone
f ort .
P eriod
I I
i s d ated c irca A D 1 58 t o t he l ate t hird c entury, t hough i t has n ow b een s uggested t hat i t may c ontinue i nto t he e arly f ourth c entury ( Jones G . and Wild 1 969A). The buildings, a t l east in t he p raetentura ,
were s till o f
c entury t hey were r ebuilt b eginning
o f
p eriod
I II
t imber i n t his p eriod; i n s tone .
f ollowed
4 3
i n
t he
l ate
t hird
T he e xcavators b elieved t hat t he
immediately
o n
t he
e nd
o f
p eriod
I I
( Jones G ., T hompson a nd Wild 1 966). T he t imber b uildings had b een s ystematically d emolished a nd t he c are w ith w hich p ost-holes a nd o ther d epressions s uggests t hat r ebuilding i n
s uch a s
d rains h ad b een f illed with b uilding r ubble
d emolition a nd l evelling t ook p lace with i mmediate m ind . T he p eriod I I s tone g ranary was c arefully
d emolished a nd t he s tone r e-used b y t he p eriod I II b uilders ( Jones G . a nd W ild 1 969A , 1 04) . O ne p eriod I I p ost-hole h ad b een f illed w ith a c olumn c apital .
T here s eems t o h ave b een s ome r econstruction i n t he
p rincipia a t t his t ime a s i t was r ebuilt i n wattle a nd d aub. T he p raetorium was b uilt i n t he s ame s tyle o ver t he p eriod I I g ranaries . I s i t p ossible t hat o nly t he c entral r ange h ad b een i n d isrepair i n t he l ate t hird c entury? B urghwallis
T hird-century
p ottery
a nd
t wo
c oins
C arausius have b een p icked u p within t he f ort e xcavations h ave t aken p lace h ere . C hester
A g roup
o f
t hree
g ranaries
s outh
o f
T etricus
( Roberts
e ast
I a nd
1 974).
o f
t he
N o
p orta
p rincipalis d extra was d emolished , p robably i n t he l ate t hird c entury . T here was a t hick l ayer o f b roken r oof t iles l ying between t he g ranaries a nd b etween t heir s leeper walls which t he e xcavators a rgued c ould o nly h ave r eached t his p osition a fter t he r emoval o f t he g ranary f loors. I n t he t ile l ayer were two T etrican c opies, while i n t he d isturbed
material
a bove
i t
were
c oins
o f
C rispus,
Theodora
and
C onstantius I I. T he d emolition o f t hese b uildings would s uggest a r eduction i n t he g arrison o f t he f ortress - g ranary 3 , a t l east , s eems t o have c eased l ife a s a g ranary p rior t o i ts d emolition , one v entilator having b een blocked b y a f illing o f s oil o n which were p laced f our u nmortared c ourses o f s andstone b locks ( Petch a nd T hompson 1 959) .
A b uilding i mmediately w est o f
v eranda t o
t he e ast
a nd
o f
e arly
d emolished t owards t he e nd o f r oughly p aved ( Strickland 1 975).
t he p rincipia , o f
s econd-century
d ate ,
s tone w ith a
was
e ventually
t he t hird c entury a nd t he s ite was Excavations within t he r etentura
h ave s hown t hat b arrack-blocks h ad b een d emolished o ver a wide a rea a t t his t ime . T he e vidence f or a s imilar s tate o f a ffairs i n t he p raetentura h as n ot b een n oticed a lthough t his m ay b e m ore t he r esult o f
t he v ery
l imited e xcavations
c onducted u nder
t he worst
r escue
c onditions i n t his a rea . T he d ating e vidence f or b arrack-blocks, a lthough n ot c onflicting with t he s upposition t hat t his was a s ingle e vent, d oes n ot r ule o ut t he p ossibility t hat t his o ccured o ver a p eriod o f t ime f rom c irca A D 2 50 o nwards ( Strickland 1 981B, 4 32) . A n umber o f m ajor f ortress b uildings d o, h owevever , a ppear t o h ave b een r etained i n u se ; t hese i nclude t he principia , p raetorium , b uilding a nd l arge i nternal b ath-house ( ibid 4 28-30 ) .
e lliptical
T he amphitheatre was i n d isuse f or s ome t ime i n t he t hird c entury ; i t was put b ack i nto c ommision a fter AD 2 73, b ut p erhaps before A D 2 86 . T here were n o c oins o f C arausius s ealed b eneath t he p eriod I I a rena f loor ( Thompson F . 1 975). ( Richborough was a lso p rovided w ith a n amphitheatre a t a bout t his t ime ( Cunliffe 1 968, 2 48)). A s w e would e xpect , t he n umismatic e vidence w ould s upport t he c ontinued u se o f t he f ortress a t C hester i n t he l ate t hird c entury ( Webster G . 1 951) . XX l egion was c ertainly under C arausius' c ontrol b ut
T he t he
a rchaeological e vidence d oes s uggest t hat s ome o f t he l egion was p osted o ut o f t he f ortress, o r t hat i t was well u nder s trength . T he d emolition o f b arracks a nd g ranaries m ust was e xpected t o c ontinue f or a l ong t ime .
4 4
i ndicate t hat
t he s ituation
C hester-le-Street T he l ater t hird-century c oin l ist f rom t his s ite d oes n ot a llow u s t o i nfer a n a bandonment o f t he s ite a t t his p eriod. D oncaster
T hird-century
o ccupation h ere was
s light
- t races
o nly
o f
i nsubstantial h uts o n t he m etalled s urfaces o f t he i nternal s treets were f ound ( Dolby 1 972). Ab reak i n t he military o ccupation o f t he s ite h as b een i nferred i n t he t hird c entury ( Buckland a nd D olby 1 972, 2 74). E bchester
I n t he e ast a ngle o f
t he f ort,
s even b uilding p eriods were
f ound, t he l ater t hree o f s tone . P eriod V II was d ated t o t he l ater t hird c entury, with a s econd p hase b eginning i n t he e arly f ourth c entury . T he p eriod V II s tructures l ay d irectly o ver t he p eriod V I r oad s urface a nd o n t he l evelled r emains o f t he p receding b uildings ( Maxfield a nd R eed 1 975 , 6 0) . I lkley
A lthough n o e vidence w as
f ound f or
d estruction o f
t he t hird-
c entury f ort, t he n ext p hase s aw major r ebuilding . T he b uildings i n t he p raetentura, h owever, c ame t hrough u naltered. T hese were i nterpreted a s s tables a nd b arracks . T hey s eem t o h ave r etained t he s ame plan f rom t he Antonine p eriod i nto t he mid-fourth c entury a nd t hroughout t his p eriod t he s tratification i n t he s table s howed n o b reak but t he l evel o f t he f loor s imply c ontinued t o r ise g radually ( Hartley 1 966 , c entury c oins, L ancaster u se i n t he
3 8) . T here i s a m arked p reponderance o f l ater t hirdi ncluding e ight o f C arausius ( Woodward 1 925, 2 98-300 ) .
T he b ath-house o n C astle H ill , f ound i n 1 973 , w ent o ut o f l ate t hird c entury a nd t he s ite l ay a bandoned u ntil i t was
c ut b y a d itch which p receded
t he c onstruction
i tself d ated t o a fter c irca A D 3 26 .
o f
t he
Wery
Wall,
I n t he d ebris o f t he b ath-house
was f ound a l ate t hird-century c oin hoard r anging f rom G allienus t o C arausius ( Shotter a nd W hite 1 977) . T his b ath-house i s c ontemporary w ith o r l ater t han t he b uilding t hought b y R ichmond t o b e t he t hirdc entury p raetorium. I t p resumably f ormed a p art o f i t. I n t his b uilding he f ound t hird-century p ottery a nd a c oin o f S alonina ( AD 2 53-268) ( Richmond 1 959) . L eather s uggests t hat t he whole b uilding h ad been d emolished b y c irca A D 3 00 ( Leather 1 973). I t has b een s uggested t hat t he b ath-house c ould h ave b een p art o f a mansio ( i.e. o utside t he f ort) t hough t his s eems u nlikely ( Shotter 1 974 ,18) . L anchester
T he
c oin
l ist
f rom h ere
u p
t o
1 937 i ncludes n o c oins o f
t he Tetrici o r o f t he " British Empire" ( Steer 1 938). C oins o f t he T etrici a re v ery c ommon o n s ites o ccupied i n t he l ate t hird c entury . M alton
C order
i nferred a n a bandonment o f
t he f ort
c irca A D
2 80-300 .
H e f ound a l ayer o f wheat u p t o 3 0cm t hick o n t he r ampart b ank where i t had b een s pread a nd b urnt. T his must have b een d one b y t he g arrison a nd w ould m ake m ost s ense ( if i t m akes a ny s ense a t a ll) a s a p relude t o t he a bandonment o f t he f ort . T he p ottery f rom t his l ayer was d ated t o c irca A D 2 80 ( Corder 1 930), b ut Mr . J .P . Gillam b elieves t hat
t he g roup a s a whole
c ould b e s lightly e arlier.
T his
wheat
l ayer has b een f ound t o c ontain a s ignificant n umber o f g rain p ests s uch a s weevils which i s s uggested a s a r eason f or f iring t he wheat r ather t han a n a bandonment o f t he f ort ( Wenham 1 974 , 1 8) . I t s eems t o m e, however, v ery u nlikely t hat g rain would b e d estroyed o n a l arge s cale within a n o ccupied f ort a s t he f ire hazard would s urely h ave b een u nacceptable .
T he g rain d oes n ot s eem t o h ave b een d umped o n t he
4 5
r ampart a fter t he d estruction o f a g ranary b y f ire s ince t he l ayer w as t oo h omogenous. T he e xcavator was c ertain t hat t he g rain h ad been b urnt i n s itu . D id t he g arrison b urn t he g rain o n i ts a bandonment o f t he f ort b ecause i t was i nfested , r ather t han t aking i t with t hem? T he n umismatic e vidence f rom b oth t he f ort a nd t he v icus i ndicates m uch a ctivity i n t he l ater t hird c entury . I f t he v icani d id n ot m ove i nto t he f ort, t hen t he u nit m ust h ave r eturned u nder C arausius . O ld P enrith I n t he l ater t hird c entury , d eclined a nd may have b een a bandoned . t he f ort m ay a lso h ave b een a bandoned a t c irca A D 3 70 ( cf . C hesterholm) .
t he v icus s outh o f t he f ort Mr . P . Austen s uggests t hat t his
t ime ,
b eing r e-occupied
P ap c astle H ere t here were p robably two s uperimposed s tone f orts, n either o f which i s s ecurely d ated . Within were f ound t imber a nd s tone b uildings, t he l atter a ll s eeming t o d ate t o t he f ourth c entury . What e vidence t here was f rom t he t imber b uildings s uggested t hat
t hey
were o f s econd-century d ate . T he e xcavator i nferred t hat t here h ad b een a l ong p eriod o f a bandonment i n t he t hird c entury a nd t hat i n t he e arly f ourth c entury t he f ort was t otally r ebuilt and g iven new d efences . H ow l ong t he ( Charlesworth 1 965) .
s ite h ad
l ain a bandoned was
P iercebridge U ntil r ecently t he s tone f ort h ere was n ew f oundation d ating t o t he e arly f ourth c entury .
n ot
a scertained
t hought t o b e a A s tudy o f t he
n umismatic e vidence , h owever, ( over 1 ,000 c oins h ave b een f ound o n t he s ite) s uggests t hat t he f ort was f ounded s oon a fter AD 2 60 a nd was o ccupied u ntil c entury
( Scott
c irca A D 1 978 ,
3 00 o r
3 12
a nd
t hen a bandoned f or half
a
2 1) .
T empleborough T his f ort m ay h ave b een r e-occupied i n t he l ater t hird c entury f or a s hort p eriod, a fter l ying a bandoned s ince t he s econd c entury ( Simpson G . 1 973, 8 9-90). P ottery e vidence f rom t he v icus s uggests t hat t here h ad b een c ontinuous o ccupation h ere f rom t he f irst t o t he f ourth c entury ( Wade 1 950 ) . Watercrook
T he e xcavator h ere i nferred a r ebuilding o f t he f ort
c irca A D 2 70 a fter a p ossible t otal a bandonment o f t he f ort f rom c irca A D 2 20 . I n t he e ast g uardchamber o f t he n orth-east g ate , f our c oins o f A I D 2 68-273 w ere s ealed i n t he l atest o ccupation m aterial , a l ayer o f c harcoal a nd r efuse . T he p artial r ebuilding o f t he f ort w all a nd t he c utting o f a t hird d itch i s d ated b y p ottery t o t he l ate t hird c entury a nd i t i s s uggestd t hat a t t his t ime t he f ort may h ave b een e nlarged .
S hotter,
C arausian
c oins
was
( Potter
s hort
m ay
i n t he
c oin r eport,
i ndicate
1 979A ,
t hat
t he
s uggests
l ater
t hat
t he l ack
t hird-century
o f
o ccupation
2 97) .
Y ork E xcavations i n S t . S ampson's S quare i n 1 928 r evealed p art o f a b uilding, p robably a b arrack-block . A s a ll t he walls s urvived t o a u niform height,
t he e xcavator s uggested t hat t he b uilding h ad been
d eliberately d emolished i n t he R oman p eriod .
O f
t he o ver
1 00 s herds
f rom t he d ebris, n one c ould b e d ated l ater t han A D 2 50. Ab uilding o f a m ore p retentious c haracter h ad b een b uilt o n t he s ite a t l east b y t he e arly f ourth c entury ( Miller 1 928, 9 6).
Ab arrack-block b y t he
e ast a ngle o f t he f ortress was c ompletely d emolished b y t he t ime t hat t he f ourth-century d efences were b uilt ( Miller 1 927). T he i nner
4 6
d itch o utside t he t ower SW5 had b een a llowed t o s ilt u p i n t he l ate t hird c entury ( Whitwell 1 973) . I n t he e arly f ourth c entury, much o f t he f ortress wall was r eplaced f rom t he f oundations.
Q uite why t his was n eeded i s u nclear b ut i n
t he e arly t hird c entury much o f t he f ortress wall h adrequired r ebuilding i n t his manner . T he e vidence s uggests t hat t he s econdc entury wall s uffered f rom s ubsidence a nd t here m ay p ossibly h ave b een s imilar t rouble i n t he l ate t hird c entury ( RCHM Y ork 1 , 3 5). W ales B recon G aer T here s eems t o h ave b een s ome r enewed a ctivity a t t his s ite i n t he l ate t hird c entury. T here i s a small g roup o f l ate t hird-century c oins , t he c ommonest b eing t hose o f C arausius . I t h as b een s uggested t hat t he f ort was r e-occupied f or a s hort p eriod c irca A D 2 90-300 ( Jarrett 1 968A, 4 31). G . S impson b elieved t hat t he i nternal b ath-house, d ating t o t he t hird c entury, l ate i n t hat c entury ( Simpson , G . 1 963, 3 2-7) . C aerleon c entury
was s till i n u se
T he f ortress was n ot f ully o ccupied a fter t he mid-third
( Boon
1 972A ,
6 1) .
T here i s a lso l ittle e vidence f or t hriving
c anabae a t t his p eriod . T he n orth-east wall, a t l east, o f t he f ortress was i n a r uinous c ondition b y t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury . T he l atest e pigraphic e vidence f or t he p resence o f t he l egion h ere i s au nique t ile s tamped ( Leg I I A )VG V I. T he V I has b een i nterpreted a s t he t itle V ictoriana a nd would t hus d ate t o A D 2 68-270 , t hough i t m ay m ean s omething e lse . T owards t he e nd o f t he t hird c entury, s everal important f ortress b uildings, n otably t he v aletudinarium a nd t he i ntra-mural t hermae were t otally d emolished . T he p rincipia was p artly d ismantled , t hough t he b asilica r emained b asically i ntact w ell i nto t he f ourth c entury . T his s hould imply t he c essation o f military u se o f t he s ite . T he d emolition would a ppear t o have b een o rderly s ince much o f t he b uilding m aterial s eems s ite,
t o h ave b een s ystematically r emoved f rom
t he
p resumably f or r e-use e lsewhere .
T here was s qualid o ccupation w ithin t he b asilica p rincipiorum i n t he e arly f ourth c entury. F rom t he a sh o f a f ire i n t he a edes c ame a c oin o f C arausius s truck b efore c irca A D 2 90-1; t he p aving o f t he a edes h ad a lready b een r emoved b efore t he f ire was l it . I n t he r ubble c overing t he v aletudinarium c ourtyard was a w orn c oin o f c irca A D 2 703 and t wo c oins o f c irca A D 2 70; i n t he s oil a bove were f our o f C arausius' a nd t wo o f t he f ourth c entury. T he l atest c oins a ssociated with t he n ormal u se o f t he t hermae d ated t o c irca A D 2 70 . A c oin o f Q uintillus l ay i n t he a sh o f a small c ooking f ire o n t he b ottom o f o ne o f t he p lunge b aths i n t he f rigidarium a nd C arausian c oins a ppeared o n t he e xposed f loor l evelled r ubble i n t he p alaestra .
o f t he h ypocaust a nd o n t he O fficers' h ouses were a lso
d emolished . A C arausian c oin l ay o n t he l atest s treet s urface w hich w as c omposed o f b uilding r ubble a nd e xtended over t he walling i n i nsula I X . T he p raetorium was a lso p robably d emolished . N o b arrack i s k nown t o h ave b een d emolished a t t his t ime , t hough N ash-Williams t hought h e f ound e vidence o n t he V ine C ottage s ite f or t he d ecay a nd d emolition o f a b arrack i n t he t hird o r f ourth c entury r eplacement b y w ooden s tructures ( Nash-Williams 1 936 , 3 20) .
4 7
a nd
i ts
A ll
t he
c oins
o f
C arausius
a nd A llectus
a re f ound w here
t hey c learly
p ost-date t he d emolition ; t hey a re f ound o n o r a bove t he r ubble . O f t he 5 4 C arausian c oins k nown u p t o 1 972, m ost o f t hem a re e arly . O nly 1 0 A llectan c oins c ome f rom t he f ortress. B oon s uggests t hat t here was a d iminution o f t he g arrison o f C aerleon b y c irca AD 2 90 i f n ot b efore . T he g arrison may h ave l eft e arly i n C arausius' r eign, t he d emolition s quads c ontinued u se o f
t hen m oving i n . T here i s, h owever , s ome o f t he f ortress b uildings;
e vidence f or t he t he b arracks
e xcavated i n t he C roft w ere t hought b y t he e xcavator t o h ave c ontinued i n u se b y t he military a fter t he t hird c entury, t hough t hey were p erhaps n ot
f ully
o ccupied
( Murray-Threipland 1 967 ).
O ne b arrack-
b lock f ound d uring e xcavations i n 1 980 a t ' Roman G ates' , B ackhall S treet, had b een r ebuilt a nd o ccupied f or 2 0 y ears i n t he s econd q uarter o f t he f ourth c entury . L atrine p its were d ug i n t wo r ooms a nd a b ody was b uried i n a s lab-lined g rave . O f t he o ther t wo b arrackb locks e xcavated , o ne h ad b een r eoccupied i n t he l ate R oman p eriod a nd t he o ther h ad h ad a l ean-to s tructure e rected a gainst T his was t hen r eplaced b y ab ow-sided b uilding . A n umber
o f
r oads
within
t he
f ortress
were
i ts w est
r emetalled .
wall .
T he
v ia
p rincipalis was p artly r esurfaced a nd t he v ia s agularis i n t he e astern c orner was e ntirely r emade , p robably a t t his t ime ( 4urray-Threipland 1 965), t hough t he d ating e vidence f or t his i s a h ammerhead m ortarium w hich a re n otoriously d ifficult t o d ate c losely . I n t he l ate t hird c entury t he v ia s agularis, f ound a t B ackhall S treet, was w idened t o t he e ast a fter i ts western s ide h ad b een b locked b y t he c ollapse o f a b arrack .
I t
i s u nclear w hether t his a ctivity i ndicates
t he p resence
o f p art o f t he l egion a t t his d ate a s t here i s n o e vidence f or t he e xistence o f a l ate f ort o r f ortlet within t he f ortress a rea ( cf . N ovaesium , V indonissa) . N o d oubt c ivilians would s oon m ove within t he f ortress when t he m ilitary l eft a nd t he f ourth c entury o ccupation m ay o nly
r epresent t he p resence o f t hese p eople .
C aernarvon Wheeler, who d ug much o f t he f ort i n t he e arly 1 920s, b elieved t hat t here h ad b een a l ong p eriod o f a bandonment i n t he f irst half o f t he f ourth c entury f rom c irca A D 2 90 t ill s hortly a fter t he mid-fourth c entury ( Wheeler 1 922A , 3 08-9). T he l ength o f t his a bandonment i s n ow d oubted b y m any s cholars a nd d iscounted b y a t l east o ne ( Casey 1 974B, 6 1) . A p eriod o f a bandonment , a t l east o f t he s ite b y t he a rmy, s hould n ot b e a ltogether d iscounted even t hough t he n umismatic e vidence s uggests t hat t here h ad b een more o r l ess c ontinuous o ccupation . T here a re v ery f ew c oins o f A llectus f rom t he s ite b ut a f air n umber o f C arausius ( Boon 1 976, 6 0) which s uggests a s hort p eriod o f a bandonment f rom c irca A D 2 90. B oon s uggested t hat t he d eparture o f t he g arrison c ould b e c onnected with t he t hreat t o t he ' British Empire' i n e ither A D 2 89 o r 2 96 ( Boon 1 972B). T he a rchaeological e vidence i mplies t hat a t l east s ome p arts o f t he f ort were n eglected f or a l ong t ime i n t he l ate t hird a nd e arly f ourth c enturies .
I n
t he s teps
i nto
t he p rincipia W heeler
f ound
t hat
t he a edes f loor
t he s trongroom were c overed with a l ayer o f
a nd
black
v egetable m ould c irca 4 5cm d eep w hich h ad d rifted i n f rom t he e ntrance a nd h ad c overed a n i ron-bound b ox c ontaining 5 6 c oins f rom G allienus t o C arausius; 1 922A, 2 91).
t he
c oin
o f
t he l atter was
i n m int
c ondition ( Wheeler
When t he b uilding was r eoccupied, t he s trongroom was
h alf f illed with d ebris a nd l evelled w ith c ement i n which w ere f ound 2 0 c oins, a ll b ut o ne p robably p re A D 3 00, t he e xception b eing a C onstantinopolis m inim f ound n ear t he b ottom o f t he f illing . Amongst
4 8
t he
f illing was
a t
l east p art o f
o ne h uman s keleton ;
t he e xcavator
s uggested t hat t he p eriod o f a bandonment had b een p receded b y a d isaster w hich would h elp t o e xplain t he p resence o f t he c oin c hest i n t he s trongroom . M uch r ebuilding w as n eeded i n t he p rincipia when i t w as p ut b ack i nto c ommission, i ncluding t he r ebuilding o f t he n orth-west wall o f t he c ourtyard f rom i ts f ootings. A p urse c ontaining 1 6 c oins f rom G allienus t o C rispus was f ound u pon t he t hird-century c ourtyard f loor i n t he p rincipia . T his was c overed b y t he m etalling l aid d own d uring t he s ubsequent o ccupation o f t he b uilding w hich t he e xcavator b elieved t o b e g ood e vidence t hat t he b uilding a nd p robably t he f ort w as s till a bandoned ( Wheeler 1 924 , 7 3) . I t i s j ust p ossible t hat t he p urse w as l ost b y a s oldier e ngaged i n t he l aying o f t he n ew f loor ( cf. t he p urse a ccidentally buried i n t he r ampart b acking a t B irdoswald) ( Richmond 1 954, 5 6). A b ath-house i n t he p raetentura, which was c onstructed i n t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury, was n ever c ompleted, a nd t his m ay b e c onnected w ith t he d ecision t o a bandon t he f ort during t he b uilding work . T he b aths were d ismantled a nd t he s tone r obbed i n t he p eriod A D 3 00-325 ( Casey a nd D avies 1 976). B eneath t he c lay f loor o f t he l atest o ccupation i n b uilding X II was a small h oard o f c oins f rom V olusianus t o t he T etrici ( Wheeler 1 924, 6 8 ) . T he m ithraeum was t hought t o h ave b een f inally a bandoned c irca A D 2 90 ( Boon 1 960, 1 56). T his t ype o f b uilding u sually has m ore c onnection with t he m ilitary o n a s ite t han t he c ivilians . C aersws A t s ome t ime i n t he t hird c entury t he t imber b arracks i n t he r etentura were d ismantled a nd were n ot r eplaced , t hough t here was a l ate r oad s urface a nd t hird t o f ourth-century p ottery i n t he a rea . T he b arracks i n t he p raetentura d o n ot s eem t o h ave b een d ismantled i n t he e arly t hird c entury, b ut t his c ould have happened l ater. T he p raetorium was p erhaps d emolished i n t he l ate t hird c entury b ut t he s ite was n ot a bandoned . L ate t hird t o e arly f ourth-century p ottery was t rodden i nto t he g ravel s urface o verlying t he b uilding . T he h ypocausted r ooms a ttached t o t he p raetorium s eem t o h ave c ontinued i n u se ( Daniels, J ones G . a nd P utnam 1 967). T he c oin l ist i ncludes a n umber o f
l ate t hird-century t ypes i ncluding o ne o r
m ore o f C arausius
( Simpson G . 1 962, 1 55-6). C ardiff
T here
i s
v ery
l ittle
e vidence
f or
t he
a ctual
d ate
o f
c onstruction o f t he f ort . A c oin o f F austina I I was s ealed b elow t he c lay bank which i s c ontemporary with t he f ort wall ( Wheeler 1 922B, 3 69). A r ough u nmortared f oundation, which may h ave f ormed a r ear k erb t o t he r ampart b ank, c ontained a w orn c oin o f G allienus b etween t wo o f i ts s tones ( Webster, P . &J . 1 978). I t i s g enerally t hought o f a s b eing c ontemporary with t he main p rogramme o f S axon S hore d efences i n t he
C astell C oh en
l ater
t hird c entury .
B y t he e nd o f
t he t hird c entury,
d itch I II,
where
t ested i n s ection B 1, was s ilted u p. O n t op o f t his a nd r unning u p t o t he wall, was a mass o f s quared s tones which would s eem t o h ave c ome f rom t he f ort wall . o r p erhaps o f a bandonment
T he e xcavator i nferred a p eriod o f d ecay, ( Alcock 1 964, 7 2) . F allen wall s tones were
a lso f ound a t t he b ottom o f d itch I II i n s ection G l . f rom t he s ite, w hich
i s
o f
O f t he 2 8 c oins
t here a re o nly two o f t he l ater t hird c entury, o ne o f
C arausius .
4 9
F orden G aer
T he
t hird-century
o ccupation w as
t hought
t o h ave
e nded
b y ap eaceful a bandonment o f t he f ort ( Pryce 1 932, 4 38), t hough t he e vidence f or t his i s n ot v ery e xplicit . T he t hird a nd f ourth-century o ccupations were s eparated b y a b urnt l ayer ( between 3 A a nd 3 B P ryce a nd P ryce 1 929 ; b etween 3 a nd 4 A i n P ryce a nd P ryce 1 930).
i n I n
t he 1 930 r eport, t his m aterial i s d escribed a s c irca 1 8cm o f d isturbed s oil . A p eriod o f a bandonment has b een s uggested f ollowing t his ( Nash-Williams 1 969, 8 8), t hough a t l east i n t he s outh-east p art o f t he f ort t he e xcavators o f 1 928 c oncluded t hat 3 B was a s imple i mmediate r ebuild o f 3 A . A b uilding i n t he s outh-west a ngle s eems t o h ave b een o ccupied t hroughout t he f ort's l ife . L eintwardine
T he f ort o n t he L eintwardine v illage s ite was a bandoned
f or a l ong t ime between i ts periods 3 and 4 . The p eriod 3 r efurbishment o f t he r ampart s ealed a t hird-century s amian s herd a nd a f langed b owl ( which l ooks more l ike a B B1 f lat r immed bowl). E verywhere t he p eriod 3 l evels w ere c overed b y n early 1 5cm o f l oam . T he p eriod 4 p lan o f t he i nternal b uildings d iffers f rom t hat o f p eriod 3 . O n s ite B ( Roman R ise), p eriod 3 have b een d ismantled a nd t he s ite t idied u p.
s tructures s eem t o P eriod I II i n t he
e xternal b ath-house a lso e nded a pparently i n ap eriod o f n eglect a s o ver t he hypocaust f loors i n s ection 8 , 8 cms o f d ark-grey s ilt was f ound . T he e xcavator b elieved t hat t his m ust h ave r esulted f rom t he f looding o f t he h ypocausts a nd s uggested a bandonment . P eriod I V h ad b egun w ith a t idying u p o f t he s ite when t he h ypocausts were f illed i n with r ubble, b roken t ile a nd t he r emains o f t he c oncrete f loors . L ittle t hird-century p ottery was f ound o n t he s ite and S tanford s uggested t hat t he p eriod I II o ccupation o f t he e arly t hird c entury was o f b rief d uration , f ollowed b y a l ong p eriod o f n eglect . P eriod ' IV i s d ated b y h im t o t he f ourth c entury. ( Periods 3 a nd 4 a re t hought t o b e c ontemporary with p eriods I II a nd I V ) . O f t he 1 4 c oins r ecorded i n t he r eport, t here a re 6 l ate t hird-century t ypes, one o f t hese b eing o f
A llectus
( Stanford
1 968) .
L oughor T here was s ome o ccupation o f t his s ite i n t he t hird c entury, " perhaps c onnected with a s trengthening o f t he c oastal d efences" . A t t he e nd o f t he t hird c entury, p hase I II, t he t wo d itches, where e xcavated o n t he n orth-east s ide o f t he f ort, were f illed . T he f illing o f t he i nner d itch was r einforced with a l ight p acking o f l arge d ressed b locks, n o d oubt f rom t he n ow c ollapsed o r d emolished f ort w all . T his f illing i s d ated b y t wo B B1 c ooking-pot s herds, o ne o f t he s econd h alf o f t he t hird c entury f rom t he d itch f illing, a nd t he o ther o f t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury f rom a p it d ug i nto t he e dge o f t he o uter d itch . T his must mark t he f inal a bandonment o f t he f ort a s n o l ater r e-use o f t he d itch s ystem was f ound ( Ling a nd L ing 1 973). T races o f l ater o ccupation o n t he s ite a re u nlikely t o b e a ssociated with t he a rmy .
T he S axon S hore B radwell
T here
i s
a s harp
r ise i n t he c oin
l ist
i n t he r eign o f
C arausius.
T he l ack o f t he n ormal high p roportion o f
o ther l ater
t hird-century
r adiates
t he f ort was
i s
g ood p resumptive e vidence t hat
f ully o ccupied f or t he f irst t ime u nder C arausius . t hen o n i s u nbroken ( Hull 1 963 , 5 2-5) .
5 0
T he c oin l ist
f rom
B rancaster
T he r esults o f
t he
t he mid t o l ate-third c entury ,
1 935 e xcavations w ould s uggest t hat i n t he b uildings f ound n ear t he s outh-west
a ngle had l ain i n d isrepair. B etween t he c halk f loors o f p eriods I a nd I I was a s pread o f r ubbish c irca 4 5cm t hick c ontaining o yster s hells, a f ew a nimals b ones a nd p ottery ( St . J oseph 1 936 , 4 50) . T he c oin h as
l ist
i n
t his
r eport
s howed
a m arked p eak u nder
r ecently b een s uggested t hat S t.
e rror
( Edwards a nd G reen
1 977,
2 5).
C arausius.
I t
J oseph's d ating i s g reatly i n I t
i s
maintained
t hat
t he t wo
o ccupation l ayers f ound i n 1 935 d ate t o t he l ate f ourth c entury, t hough t he e arlier o f t he t wo had r ested o n t he u ndisturbed s andy s ubsoil . O ne s herd o f s hell-gritted w are was s tratified b eneath t he u pper f loor . G reen a nd E dwards b elieve t hat s hell-tempered ware o nly r eached N orfolk a t t he e arliest b y t he m id-fourth c entury b ut t his i s u nlikely t o b e t he c ase s ince i t was b eing p roduced i n H umberside f rom a t l east t he e arly t hird c entury. D ales ware was p roduced a t S cunthorpe a s e arly a s t he s econd c entury a nd b oth c ould e asily h ave r eached a c oastal s ite s uch a s B rancaster a t a ny t ime i n t he l ate s econd o r t hird c entury . T he p ottery between t he p eriod I a nd I I c halk f loors c ould i n e very c ase d ate t o t he mid t o l ate t hird c entury,
i f
n ot
i n c oin l oss B urgh C astle
e arlier .
A r evised c oin l ist s hows
i n t he l atter h alf o f
a r apid
i ncrease
t he t hird c entury .
T his f ort h as b een t hought o f a s b eing t he f irst o f t he
l ater t hird-century f orts b uilt t o s trengthen t he s outh a nd e ast c oastal d efences . T he e vidence f or t his i s s tructural . V ery l ittle e xcavation h as b een d one o n t he s ite a nd n one has b een a dequately p ublished . T he f ort w as p ossibly t rapezoidal i n s hape ( the west wall h as vanished). T he two a ngles p reserved a re r ounded . I n 1 960 t he t urret-like s tructure, which had b een o f o ne b uild with t he s outh w all , was r e-excavated ( Green 1 961) . G reen a lso e xcavated w ithin t he n orth-east a ngle w here h e f ound e vidence f or a n T he
c ombination
o f
i nternal
i nterval
a nd
i nternal a ngle-tower .
a ngle-towers
w ith
r ounded
a ngles and i nternal r amparts s uggests t hat t he f ort was b uilt a t a t ime when t he p rovision o f e xternal t owers w as a n ew i dea ( i .e . t hat t he f ort i n t he f irst p hase was m ore r eminiscent o f a p rincipate f ort t han o f m any o f t he o ther l ate t hird-century S axon S hore f orts) . I ts t hick d efensive wall c ould b e p arallelled a t R eculver a nd i n t he n orth a t P iercebridge . T he p resence o f a n i nternal r ampart h as b een d oubted . H arrod a t t he e ast g ate f ound w hat h e t ook t o b e r etaining w alls f or t he r ampart ( Harrod 1 859, 1 52) which J ohnson s uggests c ould b e t he walls o f g uardchambers ( Johnson J . 1 976A, 3 8), b ut t his i s u nlikely a s t hey a re s played t owards t he i nterior o f t he f ort ( fig 1 8 .5). T he s outh g ate a t Ambleside has s imilar r ampart r evetment w alls
( fig
1 8 .6) .
A n e arth r ampart i s l ikely i n a ny c ase a s t he w all
i s r educed i n t hickness f rom 3 .5m a t f oundation l evel t o c irca 1 .3m a t t he p resent s urviving h eight o f t he wall . A r ampart w ould b e n eeded t o e ither a llow a n i ncrease i n t he width o f t he p arapet walk o r t o p rovide a r ampart w alk a t a l ower l evel , a s a t t he e ast a ngle o f Y ork ( Miller 1 928, 6 8) . I f t he wall i s s tanding t o a pproximately i ts o riginal height, n o p rovision c an b e s een f or e xtending t he p arapet w alk o n a t imber f ramework . T he
walls
a t
C aistor-by-Norwich
a re
v irtually
i dentical
t o
t hose a t
B urgh; t hey a re p rovided with a n e arth b ank ( Johnson J . 1 976, 9 8). G reen f ound b y t he i nterval t urret a nd i n t he n orth-east a ngle w hat h e t ook t o b e l ean-to b uildings a gainst t he f ort wall b ut,
5 1
i f t his i s
c orrect,
t hen
t he r ampart h ere a t
l east
m ust h ave b een l ater r emoved .
A t s ome s ites o n t he C ontinent where t he d efensive wall was n arrow, b ut n o r ampart was p rovided, b uttresses w ere p laced a long t he i nner f ace o f
t he wall t o s upport
e xternal f ort's f ort
t he p arapet walk ,
e .g .
X anten ,
B onn .
T he
t owers a t B urgh C astle were a dded o n d uring t he c ourse o f
c onstruction . wall,
t he
F or
t he f irst
f acing o f
which
2 .2m
t hey a re n ot
c ontinues behind
b onded
t hem;
i nto
t he t he
s ome have
s uggested t hat t his was t o a llow t he g reater weight o f t he e xternal t owers t o s ettle more t han t he wall. c onstruction o f t he wall .
T he t op
o f
T here were two phases i n t he t he
l ower p art was
a nd smoothed o ver with m ortar which Ward s uggested was a ccess
o f
r ain
c essation
i n
t o
t he
( Ward
r ounded
a ngles
f ort
t actical u se t he
b elow
a nd
T he
t owers
a bove
t he work .
t he f ort wall
f rom
c ore
o f
l ine
1 911,
s uch
o f
6 2) .
s how
f ort
t o t hat o f
t he
r epresent
a s
b uilder's n either
a winter's
t his h eight a re b onded i nto t owers
u nfamiliarity
t ower
p rojects
t o
with
B urgh
t he p rincipate
t he h eavily d efended e nclosures o f
t he t he
s ufficiently
t o b e a ble t o e nfilade t he c urtain .
C astle c ould t hus mark t he a ctual c hangeover f rom o f
o ff
T he a ddition o f e xternal
t he
t owers
t he wall
c ould
f inished
t o p revent
t ype
t he l ate Empire .
T he a ngle-tower was t hought t o h ave b een d emolished o n t he a ddition o f t he e xternal t ower b ut J ohnson, who i s a t p resent e ngaged i n publishing t he e xcavations o f
t he l ate Mr. C . G reen,
suggests
t hat
t his i s n ot s o a s h e d oubts t he p resence o f a t urret i n t he n orth-east a ngle . G reen o nly f ound a s hort l ength o f wall f oundation o f what h e t ook
t o b e
t he b ack wall o f
t he t urret.
The numismatic e vidence
s uggests t hat t he f ort was built under C onstantine . c oins
t hat
a re e arlier
t he
c oin
l ist
b ut
t here were
p ublished
b y
t he
b y
B urgh
military
( Ellison D over
i n
1 948,
n o
t hree o f A llectus
C aistor-by-Yarmouth r eplaced
t han t he f ourth c entury
I f
c oins
o f
( Morris A .
There a re few
( Johnson J .
C arausius
1 948 ,
1 980B) .
were
1 13) .
t his was a n e arly S axon S hore f ort
C astle
i n
t he
l ater
c annot
be
d etected
t hird c entury, i n
t he
I n
r ecorded
i ts
w hich
was
a bandonment
a rchaeological
r ecord
1 966) .
N o
d ating e vidence f rom
t he S axon S hore
f ort o n t his s ite h as
been published but i ts p rovision with a r ampart bank c ould s uggest t hat i t d ates e arly i n t he s eries . I t h as s ome i ntegral b astions a nd o thers were a dded l ater. T he s tyle o f c onstruction i s matched c losely
a t
C anterbury,
t hough
here
t here
a re
i nternal
t urrets.
Within t he e arth bank a t C anterbury was a c oin o f P ostumus.
I t i s
p ossible t hat D over and Canterbury were walled a s ar esponse t o t he s ame t hreat, L ympne
a nd t hey m ay b e c ontemporary
T he c oin e vidence s uggests
( Johnson J .
1 976A ,
1 00-1).
t hat o ccupation b egan i n t he l ater
t hird c entury. C unliffe t hought t hat t he e ast g ate was p robably built i n t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury ( Cunliffe 1 977; now s ee
C unliffe
P evensey
1 980 ,
T his
2 85) .
f ort
has
b een
c onsidered
S axon S hore s ystem o n t he evidence o f c irca
l m
6 7) .
I ts u nusual p lan ,
a long
a b eam
a l ate
a c oin o f
h ole b eneath a p rimary
a ddition
C onstantine
t ower
( Bushe-Fox
t he a dvanced t ype o f g ateway s een a t
t o
t he
f ound 1 932A ,
t he west
g ate a nd t he g reater h eight o f i t walls, h ave b een seen a s f urther e vidence f or i ts l ate d ate . T he c oin l ist s hows a marked i ncrease i n i ssues
a t
t he
t ime
o f
C onstantine
5 2
( cf .
B urgh C astle) .
T here i s, h owever , a b ody o f a rchaeological e vidence which s uggests a l ate t hird-century d ate f or t he f ort's c onstruction . E xcavations i n 1 936 b y t he e ast g ate f ound a n umber o f l ate t hird-century r adiates a nd c oins o f C arausius i n t he o ccupation l ayer i mmediately o verlying t he b uilders' d ebris. T he d itch o n t he s outh-west s ide o f t he f ort y ielded m uch l ate t hird a nd f ourth-century r ubbish ( Cotterill 1 937). A n umber o f C arausian c oins were a lso f ound a t t he b ottom o f t he d itch n ear t he west g ate ( Wilson 1 941, 3 9) . W ilson b elieved t hat t he f ort w as o f l ate t hird-century d ate ( Wilson 1 940, 1 97), a s d id R ichmond ( Richmond 1 960, 1 83). I t i s h ighly u nlikely t hat i f t he f ort was b uilt
i n t he s econd q uarter o f
t he f ourth c entury
( a c onstruction
u nder C onstans h as b een s uggested) t here would b e c oins o f C arausius s till i n c irculation . T here i s n o e vidence f or e arlier o ccupation o n t he s ite . ( The t iles s tamped C LBR must r epresent o ccupation s omewhere i n t he v icinity o f t he f ort, b ut p resumably n ot o n i ts s ite) ( Peacock 1 977, 2 46). T hese c oins must d ate t he f ort t o t he l ater t hird
c entury;
J ohnson
s uggests
t hat
t he C onstantian c oin c ould
c onceivably have f ound i ts way i nto t he beam h ole a s a r esult o f a nimal a ction . T he a pparently a dvanced p lan o f t he west g ate ( fig 1 9.1A) need not imply a date i n t he f ourth c entury f or i ts c onstruction. T he o ther S axon S hore f orts have g ate p lans o f d iffering c omplexity r anging f rom t he e ast g ate a t B urgh C astle ( fig 1 8 .5) - a nd P evensey i tself ( fig 1 9 .1B) - t o t he e ast a nd west g ates ( fig 1 9 .2A) a t P ortchester, y et t hese a re s till d ated t o t he l ate t hird c entury . P evensey may b e t he l atest i n t he s eries, b ut i t i s s till o f t hirdc entury d ate . A lso , t he i rregular p lan o f t he f ort ( fig 6 .2) n eed n ot i ndicate i ts l ate d ate . T he f ort s ite ( apart f rom p erhaps D over) i s t he o nly o ne o n t he S axon S hore where t he t opography f avours a n i rregular s hape . E ven i n t he e arly Empire, t he R omans were n ot a verse t o b uilding f orts o f i rregular p lan i f t he t opography d emanded i t , e .g . H odhill , B ewcastle , V indonissa . T he f ort p lan o f L ympne a s u sually r estored ( fig 6 .1) i s e qually s uggested t hat t his may b e i llusory.
i rregular , t hough C unliffe h as T he f ort may o riginally have
b een o f r egular s hape, t he p resent s tate o f t he walls b eing d ue t o e xtensive s lip f or which t he s ite i s f amed ( Cunliffe 1 980, 2 54-6). T wo f orts i n S witzerland 2 0 m iles a part a re d ated b y i nscriptions t o D iocletians' r eign . T agaestum ( Burg b ei S tein am R hein) i s s quare with
projecting
s olid
c ircular
and
hollow
polygonal
t owers;
V itudurum ( Oberwinterthus) i s p olygonal with s olid s emicircular t owers ( Butler 1 971B, 1 01).
P ortchester
was d ated b y t he e xcavator t o t he r eign o f C arausius,
t hough i t c ould d ate s lightly e arlier . A c oin o f G allienus s ealed b elow t he c lay which had c ome f rom t he wall's f oundation t rench a nd a nother s ealed b elow t he c obbles o f t he r oad i n t he s outh g ate p rovide a t erminus p ost q uem o f c irca A D 2 60-268 f or t he f ort's c onstruction . I n a t hin d eposit o f s oil a t t he b ack o f t he wall o n t o which s ome m ortar a nd o ccupation m aterial h ad f allen , were t wo c oins o f T etricus I a nd C arausius which had b een s ealed b y a t hick l ayer o f c lay d eposited a round t he s caffold p osts . T he c oins o f C arausius d ate t he e nd o f t he wall's c onstruction t o A D 2 86 o r l ater .
s hould C oins
p rior t o C arausius a re c omparatively f ew i n n umber a nd worn i n c ondition whereas C arausian c oins a re a bundant a nd o ften i n f reshlym inted c ondition a nd m ostly b elonging t o t he e arly p art o f h is r eign .
5 3
T here a re v ery f ew o f A llectus. T he f ort would s eem t o h ave b een c ompleted e arly i n C arausius' r eign a nd t hen a lmost c ompletely a bandoned , p erhaps f or a d ecade ( Cunliffe 1 975 , 4 23) . R eculver A fter a p eriod o f i nactivity o r e ven a bandonment i n t he m id-third c entury, n ew b uildings w ere e rected . A p air o f s ubstantial b arracks w ere b uilt e ast o f t he p rincipia a nd a small b ath-house n orth o f t he v ia p rincipalis . O ther b uildings s eem t o h ave b een m odified a t a bout t his t ime a nd i t was s uggested t hat t his r ebuilding i s c ontemporary with t he s trengthening o f t he S axon S hore with n ew f orts ( Philp 1 969A). O f t he two b arracks built a t t his t ime, t he l arger h ad b y A D 3 00 f allen i nto r uin whilst t he smaller was b urnt d own a fter A D 2 70 a nd was a lso d erelict b y A D 3 00 ( Philp 1 962) . A b uilding n ear t he s outh g ate f ell
i nto r uin;
s ome 9 1cm o f t he b uilding's walls
s tood a bove a c oncrete f loor u pon which t he t iled r oof h ad f allen ( Home 1 929); t his m ay b e c ontemporary with t he r uin o f t he b uildings e ast o f t he p rincipia . T he s trongroom i n t he p rincipia h ad been f illed with r ubble, i ncluding t ile, wall p laster a nd c oins, mostly l ate t hird-century r adiates ( Philp 1 961) . A n a dequate c oin l ist h as n ot b een p ublished b ut o f t he c oins f ound d uring t he c onstruction o f t he n ew s ea wall, t here i s a f air p roportion o f l ate t hird-century e xamples, i ncluding c oins o f C arausius a nd Allectus ( Kent Arch . R eview, N os. 1 9 a nd 2 3). o utside t he f ort . R ichborough
T he
S axon
Many o f t hese c oins will have c ome f rom
S hore
f ort h ere w as
t otally
e xcavated i n t he
1 920s a nd 1 930s . I t was t hen d ated t o t he t ime o f C arausius a nd t hat d ate has b een g enerally a ccepted until 1 970 . T he t hird-century f ortlet o n t he s ite s eemed t o have b een d emolished and i ts d itches f illed immediately b efore t he c onstruction o f t he s tone f ort.
I n
t his f illing , t he e xcavator s tated e xplicitly t hat t here were n o c oins o f C arausius, a lthough t here were o ver 4 00 o f h is c oins f rom t he s ite ( Bushe-Fox 1 949 , 6 6 ) . P earce r ecorded o ne C arausian c oin a s c oming f rom t he f illing - t his c ould b e a m istake o r a n i ntrusive p iece . I n1 924
B ushe-Fox
f ound
a wall
f oundation
3 .96m
wide,
c utting
t hrough
t he t hird-century h ouse , s ite I II, which was n early a t r ight a ngles t o t he n orth f ort wall a nd must have b een f or t he f ort's e ast wall, b ut n o wall e ver s eems
t o have b een b uilt o n i t.
T he f ort was
l ater
p rovided w ith a wall f urther t o t he e ast ( Bushe-Fox 1 928 , 6 ) . L ater ap it -was d ug t hrough t he f oundation, p resumably when i ts e xistence h ad b een f orgotten ( Johnson J . 1 970 , 2 45) . I t c ontained 1 40 c oins o f which n one d ated t o C arausius " The d ate o f t he f oundation c an h ardly b e l ater t han c irca 2 85" ( Bushe-Fox 1 932B, 2 3) . A s
e arly
a s
1 932 t he e xcavator d ated t he f ort's
c onstruction t o
c irca
A D 2 75-285: " The a rchaeological e vidence f rom t he s ite p oints t o a d ate s lightly b efore t he t ime o f C arausius f or t he b uilding o f t he s tone f ort" ( Bushe-Fox 1 932A, 7 0). B y 1 949, h owever, t he e xcavator d ealing
with
t he
s ame
e vidence
c ould write:
" There i s a lso n o h istorical o r o ther r eason f or t he b uilding o f t he s tone f ort d uring t he p eriod 2 73-287 , b ut s uch a work c ould b e j ustly a ttributed t o a m an w ith t he i nitiative o f C arausius w ho h ad t o d efend t he c oast a nd t he p rincipal C hannel p orts a gainst b oth t he S axons a nd t he f orces o f I mperial R ome" ( Bushe-Fox 1 949 , 6 6) .
5 4
I t i s n ot o nly o n t he n orthern f rontier t hat h istorical c onsiderations a re s ometimes p referred t o a rchaeological e vidence ! T he f ort i s n ow g enerally d ated t o P robus. 9 1cms o f e arth h ad a ccumulated o ver t he ' east wall ' f oundation b efore t he p re-Carausian p it was d ug t hrough i t, implying t hat a t l east t he b eginning o f c onstruction work o n t he s tone f ort d ates t o a c onsiderable t ime b efore C arausius . T he f ort o f B aginton n ear C oventry,
a fter a l ife o f a bout 2 0 y ears,
was a bandoned c irca A D 8 0 . T here i s e vidence, h owever, f or t he s ite's r eoccupation b y t he a rmy a t s ome t ime - p robably i n t he l ater t hird c entury . s econd c entury
T his p hase had o riginally b een d ated t o t he e arly u ntil a s ecurely-stratified c oin o f G allienus was
f ound . T he o nly f eatures k nown o f t his d ate a re a m assive s ix-post, s ingle-portal, t imber g ateway i n o ne p ost-hole o f w hich was f ound t he a bove-mentioned c oin
( fig
1 8 .3 )
a nd a v ery w ide ,
r ound-bottomed d itch
( fig 8 .2) . T here w as n o o ther i ndication o f t hird-century o ccupation e xcept f or s ome l ocally-made p ottery ( Hobley, 1 974). T he f ort may h ave had a v ery s hort l ife, t hough i t i s p ossible t hat t he u pper l evels h ave b een r emoved b y a griculture . B efore
c onsidering
what
c onclusions
c an b e
d rawn
f rom
t he a bove
a rchaeological e vidence, i t may b e well t o n ote t he d ifficulty o f p roving t he a bandonment o f a f ort b y t he a rmy u sing a rchaeological methods. An a bandonment c an o nly b e p roved a rchaeologically b y a n a bsence o f m aterial o f a c ertain d ate .
P ottery s hould b e m ost u seful
f or t his a s i t h as g enerally a s hort l ife a nd a lthough s ome p ieces c an r emain i n u se f or a l ong p eriod, t he b ulk o f t he material i s r apidly b roken a nd d iscarded . T his c an b e r epresented g raphically a s a r everse e xpediential c urve . W hen p ottery c an b e c losely d ated, v ery p recise d ating f or a f ort's a bandonment c an b e a chieved - f irst a nd s econd-century s amian i s s ufficiently c losely d atable t o a llow t his ( cf. H artley 1 972). Unstamped c oarse ware, h owever, c an o nly b e d ated w ithin w ide l imits a nd i t i s h ence o f l ittle u se a s a n i ndicator o f a p eriod o f a bandonment s panning o nly a f ew d ecades. T his i s p articularly s o i n t he l ate-third c entury. T he d ating o f p ottery b etween t he m id-third a nd m id-fourth c entury i s e xtremely d ifficult a s m any o f
t he t ypes i n p roduction a t t his t ime h ad a v ery l ong l ife w ith
l ittle a pparent ,
o r a t
l east
d atable ,
c hange i n f orm ,
e .g .
h ammerhead
m ortaria. T he c oin e vidence i s a lso f raught w ith d ifficulty . C oins c an h ave a v ery l ong l ife i n c irculation b ut t his c an o ften b e c urtailed o wing t o p olitical o r e conomic f actors . T he p roduction o f c oins v aried f rom o ne r eign t o a nother a nd a lso within r eigns.
I n many c ases,
e ven
c oins c annot b e p recisely d ated. I n t he l ate t hird c entury t he p roblem o f i nterpreting t he c oin e vidence i s e specially a cute s ince v ery f ew c oins c ame i nto B ritain i n t he p eriod A D 2 73 t o 2 86. T hroughout
t his
period
t he
i ssues
o f
t he
previous
d ecade
o r
two
c ontinued i n c irculation a long w ith n umerous u nofficial c opies o f t hem - t he s o-called barbarous r adiates. T hough t hese will h ave b een b roadly c ontemporary w ith t heir p rototypes, t hey c annot b e p recisely d ated . T he l ength o f t ime t hat a c oin has b een i n c irculation i s d ifficult t o a scertain ; a ttempts t o a ssess t he p eriod o f c irculation b y p aying a ttention t o t he wear o n a c oin a re wholly s ubjective.
5 5
D isturbed
c oin
h oards
c an
a lso
c omplicate
t he s ituation .
F rom
s ites t he number o f c oins f ound are i nsufficient s tatistically r eliable c onclusions t o b e d rawn . E pigraphic e vidence Britain.
I t
i s
c an
r arely a vailable f or be
biased
when
t he
i nterpretations o f i t when f ound . T he d oubt 1 912 f rom B irdoswald i s a c ase i n p oint . N ot
o nly
i s
t here
t he p roblem
o f
l ater
c omposed, o ver
r . n
p hases a s
t he
c
can
R om3n
be
m eaning
a scertaining whether
m any
1
t he
o f
R IB
a s ite
was
a bandoned - we have a lso t o t ry a nd d ecide whether t he o ccupation w hich
i s
which
i s k nown t o have been o ccupied i n t he l ate t hird c entury may
p roved a rchaeologically was
m ilitary
o r
c ivil .
E ven
a f ort
h ave b een a bandoned b y t he a rmy, t he o ccupation material b eing d erived f rom c ivilians who had moved i nto t he f ort. This d oes s eem t o have b een t he c ase a t S outh S hields where t he n umismatic evidence i s d efinitely a gainst a n a bandonment o f t he s ite i n t he l ate t hird c entury.
T he evidence f rom Malton s uggests t he s ame t hing, a s may
t hat f rom C aernarvon .
Many vici may have f ound i t
s urvive a fter t he r emoval o f t he unit. Malton
a s
a market
s urvive . s how
o ccupation b y
f orced
c entre
The f inds
t o
s tudy
d eciding
which
have
been
f rom a s ite c annot,
s oldiers
t he
may
r ather
s tructural
s tructures
impossible t o
S outh S hields a s a port a nd i n
a b etter
i n most
position
c ases,
t o
b e u sed t o
t han b y c ivilians a nd we a re h ence
e vidence .
within
H ere
a f ort
t here
were
i s
a p roblem
e ssential
t o
i n t he
c ontinued u se o f t he s ite b y t he a rmy.
The d efences must h ave b een
o f
a lso
p aramount
importance
a dministrative b uildings
a nd
o f
t he
I would f ort
s uggest
s hould h ave
b een
t hat
a ll
i n u se ,
t he
t hough
i t i s p ossible t hat i f t he a dministrative b uildings were i n d isuse t his n eed o nly s ignify m oved,
i .e .
t hat
t hat
t he f ort
was
t he headquarters
o f
t he unit h ad b een
( by p resent-day d efinition) a f ortlet .
I n a paper d elivered t o a c onference i n O xford i n March 1 979, Mr. R . J ones p roposed a new i nterpretation o f t he a rchaeological e vidence f rom t he n orthern f rontier . H e s uggests t hat t he evidence f or t he d ecay o f buildings within f orts r epresents a b reakdown i n military d iscipline a nd h e e vidence
f or
r ightly p oints
o ut
t hat
i n m ost
t he ' official' f ort b uildings
c ases
we
o nly
b eing i n d isrepair .
h ave T here
i s l ittle u nequivocal e vidence f or a s imilar s ituation i n t he b arracks a reas . ( At b oth H altonchesters a nd R udchester, p art o f t he r etentura s howed
c lear
e vidence
o f
d isuse) .
H e b elieves
t he
t roops
were s till
i n o ccupation, but t hat t hey were n ot l onger c ommanded b y o fficers d rawn
f rom
t he
c ity
a ristocracies
o f
o ther
p rovinces
and
t his,
t ogether with a b reakdown o f p ay ( mid-third c entury c oins a re r are a s s ite f inds) b rought a bout a c ollapse i n a rmy d iscipline ( Jones R . 1 981, 4 09). I f ind i t v ery d ifficult t o a ccept t hat t he R omans would have a llowed d iscipline t o f all s o much i n t he t hird c entury t hat a f ort's d efences c ould have b een i n a n a dvanced s tate o f d isrepair o r t hat
major
T roops
f ort
l iving
b uildings
would
have
p urpose a nd with t he c hronic s hortage o f t ime,
i t
i s
b een
a llowed
t o
c ollapse.
i n t hese f orts would h ave s erved n o u seful military
m uch m ore l ikely t hat
m en
o n
t he
C ontinent
a t
t his
t roops would h ave b een r emoved f rom
t he i sland. F or J ones,
t he c rucial p eriod f or t he n orth was i n t he t hird q uarter
o f t he t hird c entury a fter which t hings were n ever t he s ame a gain . H e mentions R IB 1 885 f rom B irdoswald, s et u p u nder t he Tetrici, t o
5 6
i llustrate
t he d ifference i n s tyle o f
s uch i nscriptions b y t he A D
2 70s, whereas I c onsider t his o ne o f t he l atest i nscriptions b elonging t o t he ' old o rder' while t he c ohors I Aelia Dacorum was s till i n g arrison. O f t he 1 5 f orts o f t he W all s ystem h ere d iscussed , a t n o s ite i s t here d efinite evidence f or t he a bandonment o f t he whole f ort. T he two f orts on t he C umbrian c oast d o s eem t o h ave b een h eld c ontinuously f rom t he t hird t o t he mid-fourth c entury. P erhaps t his was a r eaction,
a s has b een s uggested,
t o p ressure f rom t he I rish f irst
r ecorded i n t he p anegyric o f A D 2 97 ( Mann 1 974, 3 8). O f t he o ther f orts d iscussed, C arrawburgh ( and p ossibly H ousesteads) may s how p ositive e vidence o f b eing o ccupied b y t he m ilitary a t t his t ime . A t t he o ther 1 0 f orts ( the e vidence f rom R isingham i s t oo s canty t o a llow c onclusions t o b e d rawn f rom i t), I would s uggest t hat t here was e ither a p artial o r t otal a bandonment o f t hese f orts . T he e vidence f rom Haltonchesters, B irdoswald, R udchester a nd S outh S hields d oes i mply t hat t hese s ites were t otally a bandoned b y t he a rmy i n t he l ater t hird c entury . T he p eriod o f p artial o r t otal a bandonment e nvisaged n eed not have b een l ong a s t imber-framed wattle a nd d aub b uildings, e ven i f p rovided with s tone s ill walls, would s oon c ollapse i f t hey w ere n ot k ept i n g ood r epair . T he maximum p eriod o f a bandonment a t B irdoswald c an o nly have b een 2 8 years a nd i t c ould have b een much l ess. On S ewingshields, H adrian's Wall i tself was v ery b adly d ilapidated i n t he t hird a nd f or much o f t he f ourth c entury ( pers. c omm . Mr . M . S avage) . T hat t here s till was s ome i nterest i n t he W all a t t his p eriod i s i ndicated b y t he milestone ( RIB 2 307) f ound a t C awfields i n 1 882 which was s et u p b y t he e mperor N umerian ( September A D 2 83-November 2 84) o n t he m ilitary way, s uggesting t he c ontinued u se o f t hat r oad b y t he military. I t would b e u nlikely, i n a military a rea l ike t he c entral Wall s ector, f or a r oad t o b e r epaired f or a ny o ther r eason t han f or u se b y t he a rmy . A s imilar s ituation t o t hat o n t he W all s eems t o h ave e xisted i n t he r est o f n orthern B ritain with s ome f orts b eing a bandoned whilst o thers a lmost c ertainly were n ot.
B oth t he V I V ictrix a nd t he XX V aleria
V ictrix s eem t o h ave b een r educed i n s trength . T here i s e pigraphic e vidence f or t he p resence o f d etachments o f t he B ritish L egions o n t he C ontinent i n t he m id-third c entury . C ontemporary w ith t he r eduction i n s trength o f m any u nits, a l arge n ew f ort was b uilt a t P iercebridge a nd t he f orts o f Watercrook a nd T empleborough s eem t o h ave b een r eoCcupied a fter a l ong p eriod o f a bandonment . W hether t he l arge f ort a t N ewton K yme was ( Richmond
1 955 ,
c ontemporary w ith
t hat a t P iercebridge
i s u nclear
6 1-2) .
D uring t he t hird c entury, t here w as p robably a s teady d raining a way o f t roops t owards t he C ontinent a nd t o man t he .p roto . S axon S hore d efences o f t he e arly t o m id-third c entury. T he e vidence f rom R eculver s trongly s uggests t hat i ts g arrison c ame f rom t he a rmy o f n orthern B ritain, t hough a t what d ate i s u nclear . P hilp s uggests t hat t he f ort may have b een b uilt b y t he c lassis B ritannica, o nly l ater b eing g arrisoned b y t he c ohors I B aetasiorum ( Philp 1 981, 1 18 ) . A t B rancaster , t he t ile s tamp o f t he c ohors I A quitanorum m ust e ither i ndicate t hat i t f ormed t he f ort's g arrison o r h ad a t l east t aken p art i n t he f ort's c onstruction . T he s uggested a bandonment o f B irdoswald , w hich ' must' d ate t o A D 2 76 o r l ater, c ould well r epresent t he n eed f or t roops t o b uild a nd g arrison t he n ew f orts o n t he S axon S hore .
5 7
Wales,
l ightly h eld b y R oman t roops i n t he e arly t hird c entury,
t he e nd o f
t he c entury have b een a lmost
t otally d enuded o f
may b y t roops.
A t e very f ort where t here i s e vidence f or o ccupation i n t he e arlier t hird c entury, a bandoned b y
t he s ite,
t he
l ate
o r a t l east p art o f i t,
t hird c entury .
o f t he small g roup o f l ate u nclear ( cf. T empleborough) . Whereas
C arausius
t hird-century
a nd A llectus
m ay h ave
a t l east s ome t roops i n t he n orth,
s eems t o h ave been
Q uite what
i s
c oins
d eemed
t he
a t
s ignificance
Brecon G aer
i t n ecessary t o
i s
l eave
Wales was s tripped o f i ts l egion
a nd o f most o f i ts a uxiliaries and t he l egion never r eturned t o i ts o ld f ortress. n ot
c lear .
When s ome o f t he o ther f orts were a gain o ccupied i s T here was
a marked d ecline
i n h oarding d uring C arausius'
r eign with a s hift o f emphasis t o S outhern B ritain i n g eneral w hich i s maintained
t hroughout Allectus' r eign
( Shiel 1 977,
8 5).
T his c ould
r eflect t he l ack o f t hese c oins i n t he principality d ue t o t he very f ew t roops s till p resent i n t he a rea .
I n t he p re-Hadrianic p eriod
t he d istribution o f g old c oin i n B ritain was widespread whereas i n t he p eriod f rom H adrian t o S everus i t i s c oncentrated i n t he n orth . i s
g enerally
i nterprets
r are
i n
t hird-century
Britain
and
Shiel
t his a s e vidence f or t he c ontinued r eduction o f
t he B ritish p rovinces .
U nder
t he
' British
Empire'
t here
G old
r ightly
t he a rmy o f was
a gain a
s izeable a rmy i n t he c ountry, but i t was c learly ( as i s s een b y t he g old a nd s ilver h oard d istribution) c oncentrated i n t he s outh a nd e ast o f
t he
Was
c ountry .
t he
C umbrian
Hiberni?
c oast
s till
T he a bandonment o f
h eld
owing
t o
t he Welsh f orts
f rom
t he
may s uggest t hat
t he
t hreat
t he
t hreat f rom I reland had not materialised u ntil t he very e nd o f t he t hird
c entury,
believe. a gainst
o r
was
n ot
a s
s erious
a s
t he p anegyrist
t he n orthern
t ribes.
T he
Wall
g arrison
r educed i f t he o utposts were s till held. n orth
would h ave
u s
T he C umbrian c oast f orts may have been held a s ad efence
i n
t he
l ate
t hird c entury;
i tself
c ould
b e
T here was t rouble i n t he
B ewcastle
may h ave
b een
d estroyed
a t t his t ime. C arinus a nd Numerian a ssumed t he t itle Britannicus Maximus i n AD 2 84 ( ILS 6 08). J arrett has s uggested t hat t he t roops r ecorded
o n
C arausius' l egionary
c oinage f rom n on-British
have f ormed a n exercitus a nd b e c onnected with t his 1 968B,
8 8).
D iocletian
n either c ase i s T he
a ssumed
t he whereabouts o f
s trengthening
o f
t he
t he
s ame
t itle
l egions
t itle
i n
AD
m ay
( Jarrett 2 85.
I n
t he f ighting k nown .
s outh
and
e ast
c oasts
with
n ew
f orts
r epresented a major b uilding p rogramme. L ittle help c ould b e e xpected f rom t he C ontinent where P robus was f ully e ngaged i n e xternal wars a nd i n p roviding H e
d id,
h owever,
i ncrease
t he
t he c ities o f Western E urope with d efences.
s ettle B urgundian a nd V andal p risoners
a rmy
with
G overnor o f B ritain
l oyal
( Zosimus,
t he
i n B ritain
u surpation
t o
s oldiers
f ollowing
o f
6 6-68).
T here was p robably n o f ighting
a
i n B ritain a t t his t ime - t he d ownfall o f t he u surper was a ccomplished b y t reachery. T he l ate t hird-century S axon S hore d efences s how marked s imilarities i n c onstruction a nd d esign t o t he l ater t hirdc entury c ity d efences o f G aul which s eem t o d ate t o t he a ftermath o f t he
g reat
p robably t hat
b arbarian c ompleted
C arausius
t he u se o f were
i nvasion o f A D b y
e arly
i n
2 76 .
T he
C arausius'
m ay h ave owed h is
r apid
S axon
r eign
s uccess
a nd
S hore
s ystem
J ohnson
a gainst
t he
was
s uggests S axons
t o
t hese n ew f ortifications a nd t o t he s trategy f or which t hey
d esigned.
H e
c ertainly had a l arge
5 8
a rmy
and
t he
l egionary
c oinage
o f
C arausius
must i ndicate t hat
l egions were under his c ommand. t he whole o f l egion
l egions
t he whole o r p art o f t hese
He may o nly have h ad c ontrol over
I I A ugusta a nd X X V aleria V ictrix p lus o ne o ther
( the panegyrist o f C onstantine mentions a l egion won over).
N ine l egions a re r ecorded on t he c oinage;
S heil b elieves t hat e ach
would be r epresented b y ad etachment " almost c ertainly o f u nder v ery
a p raepositus" l oosely
d etachments m ade,
i t
J ones
l ate
Roman
T he
p eriod;
o ften only p ossible i f
1 978,
D anube
t he
1 977,190).
i ts
c ontemporary
5 52).
t o know
e xistence
P erhaps a s
i t.
( 0.
XXXIII,
t o
a l egion
e lsewhere
u sed
d escribe
i s
r eally
i s k nown
5 2-7).
I t
a
( Duncan-
i s
i nteresting
t hat
t he
y et C arausius must have
T hat h is p ower e xtended i nto N orthern B ritain i s
m ilestone s et u p b y h im n ear C arlisle
C arausius' s uccesses
a whole
u sed
s ince n o d istinction i s
t hat
V I V ictrix i s n ot r ecorded o n t he c oinage, c ontrolled
i s
T he I I Adiutrix i s r ecorded a t s ix f orts o n t he
i n t he N otitia
p roved b y t he
1 ,000 men
t erm ' legion' i s
i t
a s well a s whole l egions a nd,
i s
d etachment
i n
( Sheil
r edundant
a gainst
t he
- P ortchester
p irates
c ertainly
a bandoned d uring C arausius' r eign .
( RIB
2 291) .
r endered s eems
t he
t o
s ystem
have
b een
A s he was f acing t he t hreat o f
i nvasion f rom t he C entral Empire v ia t he R hine mouth, P ortchester well t o t he west m ay h ave b een d eemed u nnecessary . R eculver, g uarding t he T hames
e stuary,
s hould h owever
h ave
b een
o f
p rime
i mportance .
T he
a rchaeological e vidence f rom t his s ite i s n ot y et p recise e nough t o a llow u s t o d ate t he a pparent d isuse o f t he f ort c losely but i t i s p ossible t hat i t was a bandoned o n t he d eath o f Allectus. We know f rom
t he l iterary s ources
w aiting
f or
t he
i nvasion
( Pan. Lat. V III ( V), t he
1 5,
newly-completed
t hat
t he
f leet
f leet
o f A llectus
o f A sclepiodotus b y
t he
a t
P ortchester,
e arlier f ourth
c entury,
t he
with f leet ,
r enewal o f
t rade with B ritain,
Argonne
ware
t o
l ay
i n
Wight
evidence
i ts
g ood
B ritain
e .g.
f rom
n orth-west
1 980,
G aul
T here was a
t he e xport o f B BI
( Galliou
n atural
y et t he s ite s eems
s uggests t hat t he Romans were i n c ommand o f t he s eas. a nd
2 96
1 ) and i t would be r easonable t o a ssume t hat
f ort
h arbour, would h ave f ormed t he b ase f or t his t o h ave b een t otally d isused a t t his t ime . I n
i n A D
t he I sle o f
t o A rmorica
4 13).
T here
i s
n o
r eference t o a l arge f leet i n t he C hannel a fter C arausius and S hiel s uggests t hat t here may have b een p olitical r easons f or t his - t he l esson o f C arausius' u surpation was n ot e asily f orgotten ( Shiel 1 977 , 7 ). T he l arge f leet u nder o ne c ommander may have b een d ivided and b ased o n i ndividual f orts, a s i s s uggested b y t he c lassis A nderitiana. D uring p ower
t he
t hird
c entury
t here
was
c learly
w ithin t he t wo B ritain p rovinces .
l arge p roportion o f s outh a nd e ast,
p artly a s a r esult o f t he
t o
s uggests
t hat
S uperior
may
t he h ave,
t he e nd o f
t he c entury, a
t he a rmy i n t he i sland was c oncentrated i n t he
p artly
owing
a c hange i n t he b alance o f
B y
t hreat
f rom
headquarters i n
t heory,
t he t hreat
f rom s ea r aiders a nd
t he C entral Empire . o f
units
r emained
moved i n
t he
Mr . f rom
n orth
C .M . D aniels I nferior s o
t hat
t o t he
r elative s trengths o f t he two p rovincial a rmies r emained t he s ame. I t i s n oteworthy t hat b y t he e nd o f t he c entury a l arge n umber o f n ew t roops had t o b e b rought i nto t he i sland; t his
t here were p resumably b y
t ime n o t roops i n t he n orth and west t hat c ould b e u sed a s t he
a rmy o f t he B ritish p rovinces h ad b een r educed t o t he m inimum p ossible s ize.
r ) 9
C HAPTER 4
F ORTS W ITHOUT A NGLE-TOWERS, A RTILLERY, A ND T HE P ROVISION O F P ROJECTING T OWERS
T here a re o ccupation
a n umber d o n ot s eem
e xternal a ngle-towers.
o f f orts which a t s ome t ime d uring t heir t o h ave b een p rovided with e ither i nternal o r T he s tandard f ort p lan u p t o t he m id-third
c entury i n B ritain c alled f or a small r ectangular i nternal t ower i n e ach a ngle whilst i nterval-towers.
many f orts were a lso p rovided with i nternal I n t he l ater R oman p eriod , t hese i nternal a ngle-
t owers w ere u sually r eplaced b y e xternal-towers . T here a re s ome e xamples o f e arly f orts b uilt without angle-towers. I n t urf a nd t imber f orts i t i s n ot a lways e asy t o d etermine w hether t imber t owers h ad b een p resent a s, i f t heir t imbers w ere s et o nly i nto t he r ampart w hich was t hen p artially d enuded , n o t race o f t hem would r emain . W hen f orts w ere b uilt o r r ebuilt i n s tone, o ne would e xpect t hat t he f oundations o f t he t owers would b e t aken d own t o t he s ubsoil , t hough i n s ome c ases where a s tone r evetment was a dded t o a pree xisting r ampart, t he t ower f oundations may n ot h ave r eached t hrough t he r ampart . T he i nserted i nterval-tower a t B inchester was f ounded o n t he e arlier r ampart ( Dobson a nd J arrett 1 958) a s was t he n orth a ngle-tower a t C aernarvon ( Wheeler 1 921, f ig 5 ) . I n t hese c ases, a ll t race o f a t ower c ould b e r emoved a lthough t he f ort wall m ay s till r emain i n s itu . T he s tone d efensive wall a t D rumburgh, p ossibly d ating t o c irca A D 1 63 , m et H adrian's W all a t r ight-angles a nd n o t owers were p laced i n t hese a ngles ( Haverfield 1 899 , 8 5) . T he s tone f orts a t B almuildy a nd C astläcary a lso h ave n orthern a ngles o f 9 0° w ith n o t owers w hilst t he f ort a t C arrawburgh which h as a n i dentical r elationship t o t he Wall , d oes s eem t o h ave h ad a ngle-towers ( Daniels 1 978A , 1 26) . A t C astell C ollen t he a bsence o f a t ower w as i nferred i n t he s outh-west a ngle o f t he r educed f ort ( Thomas R . 1 911), t hough A lcock maintains t hat t he t rench h ad n ot b een c arried f ar e nough t o p rove t he a bsence o f at ower ( Alcock
1 954 ,
7 3) .
T he
t ower i n t he n orth-west
a ngle
o f
t he
r educed
f ort l ooks m ore l ike a n i nterval-tower o f t he e arlier f ort, t hough i t c ould h ave r emained i n u se a s a n a ngle-tower . C order t hought t hat t here h ad n ot a t a ny t ime b een a t ower i n t he n orth a ngle a t Malton ( Corder 1 930, 1 1) b ut i t i s p ossible t hat t his a pparent a bsence o f a t ower w as t he r esult o f l ater d isturbance; n o s tratification s urvived i mmediately w ithin t he n orth a ngle f or a d istance o f
3 .05m .
A s e arly a s t he s econd c entury, t owers o n f ort walls b egan t o g o o ut o f u se . O n t he s outh-west s ide o f t he P rysg F ield a t C aerleon,
6 0
t owers were d ismantled i n t he m id-second c entury whilst o n t he n orthw est s ide o f t he s ame a rea , s ome o f t he t owers c ame t o a n e arlier e nd ( Boon 1 972A , 3 8; N ash-Williams 1 931, 1 36) . T he west a ngle-tower w as a lso p artly d emolished c irca A D 1 50 . A t Ambleside t he s outh wall o f t he n orth-east a ngle-tower was r uinous b y c irca A D 1 80 a nd was n ever r ebuilt ( Haverfield , C ollingwood a nd F reeston 1 914, 4 44 ; C ollingwood 1 915, 1 5). O n H adrian's Wall i n t he mid a nd l ater-second c entury, m any t urrets went o ut o f u se, most p robably b eing d emolished i n t he e arly t hird c entury . T he t owers o ver m any m ilecastle g ateways were a lso p robably d emolished a t t he s ame t ime . A t s ome d ate u nknown , a n i nterval-tower o n t he n orth wall a t H ousesteads west o f t he g ate was d emolished. I n t he f orts t he g round-floor c hambers o f many t owers were u sed t o h ouse ovens l ookouts.
whilst t he u pper I t i s n ot c lear
s torey o r s toreys will have h oused t o what e xtent t hey were u sed f or
a rtillery. There i s ample e vidence f or t he p resence o f a rtillery within s econd-century f orts a lthough i t h as g enerally b een a ssumed t hat d efensive a rtillery would o nly b e n eeded i n f orts i n t he t hird a nd f ourth c enturies - a v iew which s hould p erhaps b e modified . F inds o f a rtillery s hot a nd b olt h eads a re a s c ommon i n e arly a s i n l ate l evels; o ne v ery l arge ballista b all weighing o ne h undredweight was f ound a t H altonchesters i n a s econd-century l evel ( Simpson F . and Richmond 1 937,
1 67-8).
B allista b alls o f t he s ame weight o r
m ore h ave b een f ound n ear t he n orth g ate a t H ousesteads ( Collingwood 1 930A) a nd a nother was f ound i n t he t hird-century i nner d itch a t B rough-on-Noe ( Jones G . a nd W ild 1 969A ) . I t has b een s uggested t hat a rtillery was u sed o nly b y t he l egions w hich a re k nown t o h ave h ad a s tandard q uota o f a rtillery . T here i s, h owever , a l ittle l iterary e vidence k indly b rought t o m y a ttention b y Mr . J . C . C oulston, t o s uggest t hat t he a uxilia were t rained t o o perate a rtillery ( Arrian T actica 4 3, 1 -3). A rchaeologically, t he p resence o f a rtillery within a uxiliary f orts i s o ften i ndicated . Marsden s uggested t hat t hese a rtillery p ieces m ay h ave b een m anned b y l egionary d etachments
o r ,
i n t he c ase o f
t he p resumed
o naRri
a t
H igh
R ochester, t hat s uch s imple e ngines may have b een o perated b y t he a uxiliary u nit i tself ( Marsden 1 969 , 1 91) . A lthough i t i s u nlikely t hat t he a uxilia u sed a rtillery i n t he f ield, t here i s n o r eason t o d oubt t hat d efensive a rtillery c ould h ave b een c ommonly a ssigned t o f orts.
I s t here a n eed t o a ssume i n e ach c ase where a rtillery i s
a ttested a rchaeologically i n a s econd-century a uxiliary
c ontext ,
t hat
a l egionary a rtillery c rew w as p rovided? I t i s s urprising t o f ind t hat i n t he t hird c entury when we s hould p erhaps e xpect t he u se o f a rtillery t o h ave b ecome m ore c ommon , s ome f orts
w ere b uilt
w ithout a ngle-towers .
T here h as b een
m uch
w ritten
o n t he t ype o f s tructure n eeded t o s upport a nd h ouse a rtillery. I t was c ertainly p referable t o h ave a rtillery m ounted u nder c over a s t hey w ere v ery p rone t o d eterioration f rom d ampness; we would e xpect c atapultae a nd b allistae t o b e h oused i n t he wall t owers. T he r eference i n Ammianus f or t he n eed t o p rovide a r esilient p latform t o withstand t he r ecoil o f a rtillery p ieces s eems o nly t o have b een n ecessary
when
o naRri
were
b eing
u sed .
( Ammianus
o ften
m istakenly
r efers t o o nagri a s ' scorpiones'); i t i s u nlikely t hat s uch p latforms were n eeded f or t he s tone-throwing b allistae o f t he e arlier E mpire.
6 1
I n
t he Hellenistic p eriod,
a l arge n umber o f
f ortifications
were
d esigned s pecifically f or u se b y a rtillery a nd t he t owers i n which t hese
p ieces
were
t hin walls . i n
h oused
A ncient
m obile s iege t owers,
s iege o f
S alamis
were
writers
o ften
o f
m ention
g reat
t he
h eight
p lacing
with
o f
a g ood e xample o f w hich i s
r elatively
h eavy
a rtillery
t he a ccount o f
t he
i n C yprus b y Demetrius P oliocetes when h e u sed a
s iege t ower o f wood 3 9.9m high with n ine s toreys: " Into
t he
l owest
f loors
o f
t his
h e
i ntroduced
a ll
s orts
o f
t hrowers o f which t he l argest were t hree t alent e ngines; m iddle
f loors
t he
l argest
t he s mallest a rrow S iculus XX 4 8 3 ).
a rrow
f irers
s hooting
c atapults,
a nd a n umber o f
i nto
s tone
i nto
t he
t he h ighest,
s tone t hrowers ..." ( Diodorus
Marsden c onsidered t hat t he r esilient p latforms f or a rtillery l ike t hat
r ecorded b y Ammianus
were
o nly needed f or
onagri.
R ochester a n i nscription r ecording t he b uilding o f b een f ound ( RIB 1 280) d ating t o A D 2 20. R IB r estoration o f A lexander . t ook
A t
High
a b allistarium has 1 281 r ecords t he
a nother b allistarium f rom g round l evel u nder S everus
I n h is
e xcavations
t o
b e
a b allistarium
p ottery
t o
t he A D
2 20s.
o f
a nd
t his
s ite ,
d ated i t
Marsden
s aw
R ichmond
b y
t his
t he a s
f ound
w hat
i nscriptions
t he
h e and
e arliest-dated
e vidence f or o nagri, yet o ne o f t hese i nscriptions r ecords t hat t he b allistarium was b eing r estored f rom g round l evel, ( he b elieved t he t hese p latforms would b e u sed f or o nagri e ven t hough t hey a re c alled ballistaria). s ome
Although t he ballistarium f ound by Richmond s ealed
t hird-century material, o thers
i n t he f ort c ould b e much e arlier .
R ichmond h imself t hought h e h ad f ound a b allistarium a t H altonchesters which
c onsisted
o f
a h eavy p itching
o f
s tones
a nd c lay
9 .1m b ehind t he r ampart u p t o t he i ntervallum r oad R ichmond l arge
1 937,
1 67) .
H e c onnected t he u se o f
s tone b all n oted a bove which was
R ochester. b etween c ontext
E lsewhere
h e
n otes
t hat
e xtending
f or
( Simpson F .
and
t his s tructure w ith t he
a s b ig a s o ther
t hose
s tone
f rom
b alls
High
weighing
o ne h undredweight a nd 1 751bs were f ound i n a s econd-century ( Richmond 1 946 , 6 3) . A l arge b allista b all was f ound o n t he
b erm o utside t he f ourth-century west g ate a t R isingham a nd a nother was f ound o n t he west r ampart i n a t hird-century c ontext ( Richmond 1 936, 1 86,
1 94).
E arlier,
R ichmond had
f ound what he
t ook
t o b e a b allistarium
C awthorn i n t he s outh-east a ngle o f C amp A which mound
i n
s toney
t he
u pcast
f oundation
a ngle
c omposed o f
( Richmond
within
t he
m ile-fortlet
b allistarium a t H igh R ochester T here a re a n umber o f
a lternate
1 932,
3 3). a t
A
l ayers
o f
small
c lay
C ardurnock
( Simpson F .
c onsisted
was
a nd H odgson
o f
t urf
a nd v ery
and
c obble
c ompared t o 1 948,
a t
a g reat
t he
9 3) .
s ites w here e xcavators h ave i dentified t owers a s
b eing d esigned f or u se b y a rtillery a nd i n e very c ase t his h as been d ue t o t he f act t hat t he t ower d id n ot h ave a d oor a t g round l evel a nd was f illed s olid .
I n 1 922, Wheeler i dentified s uch a t ower a t t he
n orth-east g ate o f C aernarvon which r eplaced t he t imber g uardroom a nd was f illed with l oose y ellow c ement . T he e xcavator d ated i t t o t he S everan p eriod ( Wheeler 1 922, 2 70-1) . A t C hester, t he i nterval and a ngle-towers s eem t o h ave h ad s olid g round-floor c hambers ( Thompson F . 1 965,
2 8).
f loor l evel; p arapet
T he S everan t owers a t Y ork
had n o d oorways
a t g round-
t hey were e ntered f rom t he r ampart walk and f rom t he
w alk .
6 2
I n t he e ast a ngle-tower t he l ow g round-floor c hamber c ould b e e ntered b y a manhole b locked l ater i n R oman t imes . T his c hamber h ad a lways b een p artially f illed b y t he r emains o f t he r ampart b elonging t o t he e arth a nd t imber d efences a nd i t was l ater f illed with b urnt matter r einforced b y m assive b locks o f l imestone c arefully l aid i n c ourses ( RCHM Y ork,
3 1).
T he e xcavator
t hought
t hat
t he
t ower h ad b een
a
b allistarium t hroughout i ts l ife a nd t hat t he c onsolidation w ith s tone w as p robably t o a llow t he s tructure t o s upport h eavier e ngines ( Miller 1 928, 6 8). I n t he n orth-west a ngle a t C hesterholm, a s imilar t ower was f ound and t he e xcavator n oted o ther p ossible f eatures o f a n a rtillery t ower ( Birley E . 1 932B, 2 16-7). H e b elieved t he t ower t o b e c ontemporary with t he f ort wall a lthough i t had n ot b een b onded i nto i t , a nd h e s uggested t hat t his was t o a llow f or s ome r esiliency i n t he s tructure . T his t ower a lso h ad m assive f oundations, a s h ad a n i nterval-tower a t B inchester e xcavated i n 1 955 ( Dobson a nd J arrett 1 958) . B irley s uggested t hat i n b oth c ases t hese f oundations r eflect t he use o f t he t owers f or a rtillery, b ut i t i s e qually p ossible t hat t hey were g iven d eep f oundations b ecause t hey were s et i nto e arlier a nd p ossibly u nstable r ampart b anks . T he n orth-east a ngle-tower a t C hesterholm , t ower . I ts
e xcavated i n 1 979 , h as b een h ailed a s f oundations o f l arge b oulders a re v ery
a nother a rtillery l ike t hose o f t he
l ate i nterval-towers o n t he n orth a nd e ast walls a t H ousesteads w here , i n b oth c ases, t he f oundations w ould s eem t o h ave s upported a m asonry s tructure a nd were n ot p latforms l ike t he ballistaria a t H igh R ochester a nd H altonchester . T he t owers a t H ousesteads h ave d oorways i nto t heir T here
g round-floor
c hambers .
i s n o p articular r eason why t hese t ypes o f
t ower n eed h ave b een
d esigned f or u se b y a rtillery s ince t he t ype o f a rtillery t hat c ould h ave b een m ounted i n i nternal f ort-towers w ould o f n ecessity h ave b een s mall , a nd e ven m oderately-sized e ngines would h ave b een t oo l arge t o h ave b een h oused within a ngle a nd i nterval-towers. N o e specially s trong s tructure would have b een n eeded t o s upport t hese e ngines. T owers with s olid b ases may have b een o f g reater h eight t han u sual . T he U-shaped p rojecting t owers a t P ortchester, which a re g enerally t hought t o h ave b een d esigned f or a rtillery u se, h ad wooden f loors w hereas a t o ther S axon S hort f orts t he t owers h ad s olid b ases . T he i nterval-towers a t R ichborough h ad t imber-laced c oncrete f irst f loors, c irca 1 .52m t hick , a nd i t i s p ossible t hat t he l owest c hamber h ad b een f illed w ith e arth ( Cunliffe 1 968 , 2 46) . T he i nterval-tower o n t he e ast wall a t B irdoswald ,
n orth o f
t he p orta
p rincipalis d extra , h as b en s uggested a s a n a rtillery s tance . A fter a n i nserted k iln had b een d emolished i n t he l atest p hase o f t he t ower's u se, i ts e ast wall h ad b een t hickened f rom 1 .52 t o 3 .35m ( Gillam 1 950, 6 8) b y which t ime t he west a nd s outh walls were p resumably i n r uins. A t H ousesteads t he p orta d ecumana ( Birley E . 1 936,
1 ) a nd a t C hesters t he p orta p rincipalis
s inistra
( Birley E .
1 959, 1 6) were b oth b locked, u ltimately a t b oth e nds, a nd t he i nteriors were f illed u p s olid . I n b oth c ases B irley p ostulated t hat t his work d ated t o t he l ate f ourth c entury. I t h as b een s uggested t hat t he m assive p latforms s o p rovided would h ave f ormed a n e xcellent b ase o n w hich t o m ount a rtillery ( Daniels 1 978A , 1 11) . S imilar l arge r ectangular t owers with t heir f irst f loors s upported o n p iers a nd v aults a re c ommon o n t he l ower D anube f rontier .
I n s ome c ases,
t hese
t owers o ccupy t he s ites o f e arlier g ates b ut a lthough t hey a re c laimed a s a rtillery p latforms, o nly a t U lmentum i n S cythia h as s tone
6 3
s hot b een f ound i n a ssociation w ith t hem ( Crow 1 981 , 1 14-6 ) . B irley a lso s uggested t hat t he t hickenings b ehind t he n orth a nd e ast walls a t H ousesteads r epresent e mplacements p rovided f or b allistae b ut a t l east o ne o f t hese h as b een i nterpreted b y D aniels a s a s taircase r amp . I s i t p ossible t hat t he c hangeover f rom b allistae t o o nagri , p erhaps b eginning i n t he s econd c entury a nd i ncreasingly i n t he t hird c entury , r esulted a t l east i n B ritain i n t he b uilding o f f orts without i nternal a ngle-towers? A s well a s r equiring a r esilient p latform, o nagri were n ot f itted t o b eing f ired f rom w ithin t owers a nd t hey must h ave b een p laced i n t he o pen . When writing o f c amp d efences i n t he d e munitionibus c astrorum ( chapter 5 8), t he a uthor s tates t hat " artillery p ieces s hould b e s et u p n ext t o t he g ates a nd a t
t he a ngles
o n p latforms a nd i n p lace o f t owers" . I n t he a ngles o f t hose f orts known t o have had n o a ngle-towers, h owever, t here i s n o known provision o f b allistaria. Within t he north-east a ngle a t P iercebridge t here i s a l atrine , t hough t his m ay n ot b e p rimary; i n t he s outh-west a ngle n o s tructure w as i dentified . I mmediately t o t he west o f t he l atrine, t he p resence o f many l arge s tones - a lmost b oulders - s uggested t o t he e xcavators t hat t here may h ave been a b allista p latform h ere ( Richardson a nd K eeney 1 934-6 , 2 53) . A t R udchester , w ithin t he s outh-west a ngle , a f lagged f loor c onsisting mostly o f r e-used s tones was f ound which p resumably overlay t he f oundations o f t he p rimary t ower ( Brewis 1 925, 9 9).
I n t he north-
e ast a ngle a t B inchester , t here i s c lear e vidence f or a t ower having b een d emolished . O n H oppell's p lan h e m arks t he p osition o f a s tone wall w hich h ad b een r emoved ( plate 3 ), a nd o n t he a ccompanying woodc ut t he s car l eft b y t he r emoval o f t hat wall a nd t he p ossible r emains o f t he s outh-east wall c an b e s een ( Hoopell 1 891). No t ower was n oted i n t he e xcavation o f t he n orth a ngle ( Steer 1 938). N o e xcavator, o n f inding n egative e vidence f or t he p resence o f a n i nternal a ngle-tower , h as s hown m uch s urprise , n or h as a nyone s ought t o e xplain t he p ossible r easons
f or s uch a n a bsence .
I n t he s outh-west a ngle a t R eculver a t hickening o f t he wall w as n oted a nd t he e xcavator t hought t his m ore l ikely t o b e a s tructural r ather t han a n a rtillery emplacement. H owever, i t may h ave s upported a n a ngle-tower . T he p ossibly m ilitary d efences a t C aister-by-Yarmouth h ad a t ower i n t he s outh-east a ngle , b ut p erhaps n ot i n t he n orth e ast w here .a r ectangular f ooting p rojecting 1 .83m f rom t he b ack o f t he wall a nd a bout 4 .57m l ong was a dded t o t he wall . T he e xcavator d ated t his t o p erhaps A D 3 10-30 a nd s uggested t hat i t f ormed a r amp o r s taircase ( Ellison 1 966, 5 1). I n many c ases t he d ate o f f orts without a ngle-towers o r t he d ate a t w hich a ngle-towers were d emolished i s u nclear . P iercebridge d ates t o c irca A D 2 70 a nd C hesterholm, i f i t was o riginally r ebuilt without a ngle-towers a nd i f t he w ork d ates t o c irca A D 2 20 , i s a nother d ated e xample. A t B ainbridge n o t ower was f ound i n t he n orth-east angle ( Droop 1 928, 8 1) b ut i t i s p ossible t hat t he a bsence o f a t ower may o nly d ate t o t he r ebuilding o f t he e ast f ort wall i n t he e arly f ourth c entury, t hough t here i s n o e vidence t o p rove t his. o f
N o o ther angle
t he f ort h as b een e xcavated .
T he t wo f orts a t B urrow-in-Lonsdale and E lslack a re particularly i nteresting. B oth h ave b een d ated t o t he e arly f ourth c entury, b ut
6 4
o n
l ittle
evidence.
The
d ating
material
f rom
Eislack
was
i nadequately p ublished ( May 1 911) a nd t hat f rom B urrow-in-Lonsdale, f ound i n t he e xcavations o f 1 952 a nd 1 953, c onsisted o f o nly t wo p ieces o f p ottery s ignificantly s tratified ( Hildyard 1 954). B oth t hese p ieces c ould a s e asily i ndicate a d ate i n t he s econd h alf o f t he t hird c entury f or t he f ort's c onstruction . H ildyard c ompared t he f ort a t
Bur row in-Lons d ale
t o
t hat
a t
E ls l ack
and
t hought
t hem
c ontemporary; t he f ort a t P iercebridge , which was t hen a lso d ated t o t he e arly f ourth c entury, was n ot d issimilar . B oth B urrow-in-Lonsdale ( fig 3 .1) a nd E lsack ( fig 3 .2) have g ates ( where known) t owards t he c entre o f t heir walls a nd a t t he l atter f ort, t here were d efinitely n o t owers i n t he s outh-east a nd n orth-west a ngles, whilst a t t he f ormer t here was n o t ower i n t he o nly a ngle e xamined , t hat a t t he s outh-east . A t E lslack t he f ort wall, c irca 2 .67m wide, r ests o n a f ooting o ver 2 .74m wide . T he e xcavator t hought h e had f ound a c ontemporary c lay b ank . A ll t he g ates s eem t o h ave b een s ingle p ortal , t he n orth , w est and e ast b eing a bout 3 .05m wide, b ut o nly t he s outh g ate with a r oadway a bout 3 .2m wide had g uardchambers which were i nternal a nd r ectangular ( fig 2 1.6). B oth t hese g uardchambers were b uilt s eparately f rom t he f ort wall , e ven h aving t heir o wn f acing t owards t he f ort wall. T he n orth a nd s outh g ates ( fig 1 8 .2) a t B urrow-inL onsdale a re d ouble-portalled ; t he f ort wall v aries i n w idth f rom 1 .37m t o 0 .91m . W ithin t he n orth-west a ngle a t E is l ack a nd b y t he w est g ate , a s pread o f s tones c ould p ossibly h ave b een t he f oundations o f b allistaria . T hat b y t he west g ate , s et b ack 1 .22m f rom t he i nner f ace o f t he wall , c onsisted o f a l evel b ed o f c losely-packed b oulders, 4 .57 x 2 .74m which May t hought were t he f ootings o r f oundations f or t he o riginal
g ate-tower .
I n t he e arly f ourth c entury a n umber o f f orts were g iven n ew walls o r h ad
t heir
walls
e xtensively
r epaired .
E xcept
f or
t he p ossible
c ase
a t Bainbridge, t hese f orts were g iven i nternal i nterval a nd a nglet owers. A t Y ork, where a l arge part o f t he c urtain wall may have b een r ebuilt w ere b uilt .
f rom t he f oundations, b oth i nternal a nd e xternal t owers I t i s a ssumed t hat t he p rovision o f e xternal t owers was
f or u se b y a rtillery, b ut l ittle e vidence f or t he u se o f a rtillery h as b een f ound i n t he S axon S hore f orts. B oon, r eferring t o t he t owers o n t he s outh-west wall a t Y ork, writes: " Heavy a rtillery, i ndeed a r egular i nstallation o f a rtillery a t a ll was s carcely l ikely t o b e f ound ( and e ven l ess l ikely i n t he s maller t owers o f o ther l ate f ort o r t own d efences)" ( Boon 1 979) . I n a r ampart b uilding a t Y ork b y t he n orth-east g ate, a pparently o f f ourth-century d ate, f ive b allista b alls were f ound i n 1 860 , a t l east o ne o f w hich w eighed nibs ( denham 1 959-62, 5 75-6). N o s tone s hot has b een f ound a t R ichborough o r P ortchester a lthough b oth s ites have b een e xtensively e xcavated . S ome have b een n oted f rom B urgh C astle a nd p erhaps f rom P evensey ( Mothersole 1 924 , 1 70) . F rom P ortchester , o nly o ne d efinite a nd o ne p ossible a rtillery b olt were f ound ( Cunliffe 1 975, 2 33); f rom R ichborough t here m ay b e s everal b olt h eads , t hough o nly a f ew n eed b e a ssociated with t he s tone f ort ( Bushe-Fox 1 949 , 1 53; C unliffe 1 968 , 1 08). I t i s p robable t hat t he p rovision o f e xternal t owers w as p rimarily f or t he u se o f a rchers n ot f or a rtillery. I n t he f orts o n t he S axon S hore, most c urtains a re a bout 3 7 .5m l ong o r l ess. B urgh C astle, w ith c urtains o f a bout 9 1 .5 a nd 6 7 .1m , a nd P evensey w ith t wo c urtains p ossibly o f 9 1.5m a re e xceptional, b at e ven i n t hese c ases, a rchers
6 5
would s till h ave b een a ble t o p rotect t he d ead g round immediately i n f ront o f t he n eighbouring t owers. When t he c urtain l ength d ropped much b elow 3 0m, i t must h ave p resented d ifficulties f or f iring a rtillery a t s uch c lose r ange . T he t wo c urtains o f a bout 2 1m a t R ichborough a nd t hose o f c irca 2 1 a nd 1 2m a t P evensey c ould be more a dequately c overed b y a rchers o r e ven j avelin men . The H ellenistic walls b uilt f or u se b y a rtillery a t S ide h ad c urtains o f c irca 6 1m whilst a t P erge t hey were a bout 3 0m . O n A urelian 's Wall , t he a verage c urtain w as 3 0 .5m l ong . T owers were u seful t o a rchers b ecause t hey g ave t he d efenders a n a dded h eight a dvantage a nd a llowed a g reater c oncentration o f f ire p ower t han c ould e asily b e a ccommodated o n t he c urtain wall . T hey p rovided t he s ame a dvantages f or a rtillery, b ut a rtillery would b e u sed t o e ngage t he e nemy while h e was s till well b eyond t he f ort wall . T o f unction e ffectively t herefore , a rtillery d id n ot n ecessarily r equire p rojecting t owers. T he p rovision o f a wide d itch s ystem n eed n ot r eflect t he u se o f a rtillery b ut r ather t hat t he R omans were a ware o f a g reater t hreat c f . w ide d itch s ystems a t A rdoch, Whitley C astle . T he p rovision o f more c omplex d itch s ystems a nd a g reater c oncentration o f t owers , a lthough p erhaps b eing u sed i n d efences where a rtillery were employed , n eed n ot r eflect t hat s uch d efences were d esigned f or u se with a rtillery . T he walls o f R ome , b egun u nder A urelian a nd f inished b y h is s uccessor , P robus, a re l ikely t o h ave i ncorporated a ll t he l atest d evelopments i n d efensive a rchitecture . T hey a re t hought t o h ave b een d esigned f or u se b y a rtillery : 'here i s l ittle d oubt t hat A urelianic t owers were d esigned m ind .
with
t he
d eployment
o f
a rtillery ,
T he s olid c onstruction o f
e specially
b allistae,
t he t owers a nd t he wide w indows
i n o r
c asements c an b est b e e xplained i n c onnection with s iege a rtillery" ( Todd 1 978B, 3 4). W hen t he walls were f urther embellished b y Mamentius ( or p ossibly C onstantine) i n t he e arly f ourth c entury, t he h eight o f t he wall a nd t he t owers was i ncreased b ut t he d efences s eem t o h ave r etained t he s ame t actical a rrangements. Artillery was p resumably s till c onsidered o f a vailable
i n l arge e nough n umbers
g reat
importance a nd was p resumably
t o m ake
t he
d efence
o f
a n e nceinte
1 2 miles i n l ength f easible . B y t he e arly f ifth c entury, h owever, d uring t he r estoration o f t he walls b y H onorius i n A D 4 01-3 , a rtillery was n ot e nvisaged a s p laying a major r ole i n t he c ity's d efence; l ittle was d one t o t he walls a nd t owers b eyond t he r eplacement o f windows b y
n arrow
l oopholes wherever t his c ould b e c onveniently
e ffected ( Todd 1 980,
6 1).
T his must r epresent t he r eplacement o f
a rtillery b y a rchers. I t c ould h ave b een b rought a bout b y t he i nability t o p rovide a s ufficient n umber o f a rtillery pieces t o t he c ity r ather t han b y a c hange i n d efensive t actics. This c hange n o d oubt r eflects t he c urrent
c hanges
i n t he p rovinces .
We k now f rom Ammianus t hat d efensive a rtillery was u sed i n t he m idf ourth c entury a t Amida a nd S ingara . H owever , a t b oth t hese s ites, a ll t he t owers were c learly d esigned f or u se b y a rchers, b eing p rovided o nly with a rrow
s lits.
I f
p laced
o n
t he
parapet
walk,
a rtillery would s eriously h ave i nterfered w ith c ommunications a long t he wall a nd t hey would a lso h ave b een v ery v ulnerable , a s t hey would h ave b een i f p laced o n t he t ower r oofs . A t Amida t he walkway a round t he t op o f t he t owers was o nly 2m wide . T he u se o f a rtillery a t t hose s ieges must h ave b een q uite small, t he main d efence being p rovided b y a rchers
( Hastie
1 979 ,
6 6
1 9) .
T he u se
o f
a rtillery
i n f ort
d efence i s
d ifficult
t o p rove .
O nly a t
High Rochester i s t he importance o f d efensive a rtillery i ndicated, t hough e ven h ere t he d efensive s ystem e nvisaged b y R ichmond i s b ased o n v ery a gainst l ikely
l ittle e vidence . Ongari would have b een o f l imited u se small g roups o f r apidly-moving t ribesmen, t he o nly e nemy
t o h ave b een met with i n t he C heviots .
Much o f
t he e vidence f or t he u se o f a rtillery i n f orts i s d educed f rom
t he p resence o f r ecent
s tone s hot o n t hese s ites .
I n a p aper d elivered t o a
c onference i n London, Dr. D . B aatz s uggested t hat t his s tone
s hot , which i s a lways c laimed a s a rtillery ammunition , may h ave b een u sed f or t hrowing b y h and . H e p roduced a n amount o f s culptural a nd l iterary evidence t o i ndicate t hat t his method o f d efence was u sed t hroughout period . s uch
t he Ancient
r egularity
u se a s
World
f rom A ssyrian
t imes
i nto
t he
R oman
T he t ype o f s hot c ommonly f ound within Roman f orts a s
t o
s uggest
hand projectiles.
d ifferently-sized s hot a t, i ndicates d ifferent
t hat
t hat
T he
i t
was n ot p rimarily
p resence
o f
very
l arge
n umbers
f or e xample, P ergamum a nd C arthage ,
T he v ery over
l arge
s tones
f rom H igh
o ne hundredweight,
R ochester ,
weighing
d ifficult
t o t hrow anywhere without t he a id o f a machine.
t hat
o f
c learly
t hey were d esigned t o be p rojected b y ballistae o f
c alibres .
i nstance, s uggests
i s o f
d esigned f or
t he p resence o f
l arge windows
would have
f or
b een very Baatz
i n t owers n eed n ot
a lways
i ndicate t heir u se b y a rtillery a s i f t hese windows were p rovided with s hutters,
f or
f ortifications, A rtillery
d id
which
t here
i s
evidence
a t
l east
i n
s ome
Greek
t hey m ay o nly h ave b een u sable b y a rchers .
c ontinue
t o b e s upplied t o f orts
i n
t he
f ourth
c entury .
O n t he Danube, D iocletian p laced a b ridgehead f ort o n t he l eft b ank which was c alled O nagrinum . i n b oth c ases o f a rrow-firing
R ecently, r emains o f a rtillery p ieces, b allistae h ave b een f ound i n t he f orts
o f G ornea a nd O rsova o n t he n orth b ank a t t he I ron G ates ( Baatz 1 978) . U nder J ulian a p rincipate f ort n ear Mainz was r eoccupied a nd f ortified with ballistae ( A.M. 1 7 1 1 1). There i s, however, l ittle i ndisputable R oman
e vidence
f or
t he u se o f
p eriod .
6 7
a rtillery
i n B ritain i n t he l ate
C HAPTER 5
B RITAIN U NDER C ONSTANTIUS C HLORUS,
I n t he
l ate
t he n orth A D
o n
t hird
o f
c entury,
B ritain .
A D
2 96-306
t here i s s ome e vidence f or e nemy a ction i n
A p anegyric a ddressed t o C onstantius C hlorus
2 97 mentions r aids b y t he Hiberni and P icti 1 1
4 ) .
A rchaeologically ,
e nemy
a ction
i s
i n
( Pan . Lat. V et. V III
p robably
o nly
i ndicated
a t B ewcastle b ut p resumably t he P icti were o perating n orth o f t he Wall and
were
s till
a ctivities l owlands
t hought
would
h ave
t o
b e
a t hreat
j eopardised
s uggested b y R ichmond
C ertainly
when
t he p rovinces
t he
t o
( Richmond
o f
t he
R oman
province .
These
surveillance
a nd
C rawford
Britain were
o f
t he
1 949,
1 5).
r e-united with
t he
Empire, t here was much r e-organisation i n t he north and most o f t he f orts
which
t hird
h ad
c entury
e ither were
T he e xact d ate o f
b een p artly
r efurbished
o r
o r
t otally
a bandoned
i n t he
l ater
r eoccupied.
t his r e-organisation i s n ot e asy t o a scertain a s
t he
d ating o f c oarse pottery a t t his t ime i s v ery imprecise, many f orms having a very l ong l ife with l ittle c hange f rom t he t hird well i nto t he f ourth c entury . o f
C onstantine's
f rontier; f ourth
a re
r are
a s
s ite
m any t hird-century t ypes may have
c entury,
D iocletian smaller
C oins d ating b etween A D 2 73 a nd t he l arge r eign
and
t hough l oss .
c ould
e qually
o n
c ontinued
t he l arger module o f
Maximianus
p ercentage
f inds c oins
well have
t he
i ssues
northern
i n u se i nto
t he
i n t he r eign o f resulted
T he i nscription f rom B irdoswald
i n
( RIB
a
1 912)
r ecording b uilding work within t he f ort c ould d ate t o a ny t ime b etween A D
2 96
and
3 05.
T he
i nscription - t hat
f rom
o nly
o ther
H ousesteads
p ossibly ( RIB
c ontemporary
1 613)
- i s
v ery
building
f ragmentary .
P resumably t he d anger f rom t he n orth was n ot t hought t oo s erious i n A D 2 96 when C onstantius C hlorus f irst c ame t o B ritain; G aul
i n t he s ame y ear .
i nitiated
i n A D
2 96 o r
he r eturned t o
T he b uilding work i n t he n orth may h ave b een i t
c ould h ave b een
b egun
immediately p rior
t o
Constantius Chlorus' campgaign in AD 3 06 against t he Picts. D uring t he r eign o f D iocletian and Maximianus, t he s ituation i n t he n orth must h ave d eteriorated, n ecessitating a l arge-scale i nvasion o f S cotland i n t he f irst y ear o f C onstantius' r eign . A p anegyric, p robably
o f AD
S cotland
( Pan. L at. V et. V I
d ocument
o n
3 10,
t he
s uggests
g round.
t hat
t he R omans penetrated well i nto
( VIII) 7 1 1 -2), b ut t his i s d ifficult t o When
t he
f ortress
a t
C arpow
was
f irst
e xcavated i n t he 1 960s, s ome o f t he p ottery was t hought t o b e a t t he e arliest o f l ate t hird-century d ate, e specially t he hammer-head m ortaria .
I n
t hird c entury
s outhern
E ngland ,
o n o ccasion ,
b ut
t hese
h ad b een
d ated
t o
t he
e arlier
i n t he n orth i t was a ccepted t hat
t hey
f irst a ppeared o n t he m arket c irca A D 2 70 a nd a C onstantian o ccupation
6 8
o f C arpow was t hus i nferred . A s s imilar p ottery was a lso f ound a t C ramond, a n amphibious o peration, c omparable t o t hat o f S eptimius S everus, was e nvisaged with C onstantius making u se o f S everus' o ld b ases on t he F orth a nd T ay e stuaries ( Frere 1 978, 3 86). O ccupation a t C arpow i s n ow s ecurely d ated t o t he e arly t hird c entury a nd i t i s p robable t hat i t was g iven u p under C aracalla . T he n umismatic a nd s tructural e vidence o ffer n o s upport f or t he r eoccupation o f t he s ite i n t he e arly f ourth c entury . C arpow i s n ow u sed t o d ate t he e mergence o f t he h ammer-head m ortarium a nd o ther ' late' R oman f orms t o t he e arly t hird c entury . Many Roman t emporary c amps a re k nown i n S cotland, b ut a s y et i t has n ot been p ossible t o c onvincingly a ssign a ny t o t he e arly f ourth c entury . O nly o ne t emporary c amp i n t he W estern Empire - E rmelo i n H olland - has b een c laimed t o b e o f f ourth-century d ate ( the t hirdc entury material f rom within t he c amp o n Walwick F ell b y H adrian's W all , t ogether w ith t he s tructures, p robably r epresents r e-use o f t he s ite b y c ivilians ( Newbold 1 913, 7 0-4)). J ohnson s uggests t hat i t was more u sual f or t roops o n p unitive c ampaigns t o r e-use c amps a nd f orts built e arlier ( Johnson J . 1 976B). H assall h as s uggested t hat t he o penwork g old c ross-bow b rooch f rom n ear M offat, D umfriesshire , w ith
i ts
i nscription c ommemorating t he v icennalia o f D iocletian o n 2 0
N ovember A D 3 03, may p erhaps have b een l ost b y o ne o f C onstantius' o fficers d uring t his c ampaign ( Hassa n 1 976 , 1 07) . T he c ampaign was p erhaps m ore l imited t han t he p anegyric w ould s uggest . I t h ad b een b rought t o a n a pparently s uccessful c onclusion a nd C onstantius had r eturned t o Y ork b y J uly A D 3 06 . O nly t he o utposts h eld i n t he t hird c entury w ere s till o ccupied o r r eoccupied . M ost f orts i n t he n orth o f B ritain s how, o r h ave b een t hought b y t heir e xcavators t o s how, e vidence o f r ebuilding b etween AD 2 96 a nd 3 05. I t u sed t o b e t hought t hat t his r esulted f rom e nemy a ttack i n A D 2 96 : " This t ime t he d amage was worse ( than i n A D 1 97) f or i t i ncluded C hester a s well a s Y ork , a s i f t he S coti o f N orthern I reland were n ow among t he s ea r aiders b y whom t he i sland was t hreatened" ( Richmond 1 955, 6 1) . A n umber o f f orts w ere t hought t o h ave b een b uilt f or t he f irst t ime f ollowing t his d isaster , a lthough i n s ome c ases t hese c ould b e o f e arlier d ate . T he e vidence f or t he d ate o f P iercebridge, B urrow-in-Lonsdale a nd E lslack h as a lready b een d iscussed . L ittle e xcavation h as b een u ndertaken a t N ewton K yme w here t he l ate f ort o n t he s ite h ad a 3 .05m t hick wall with t races o f ag ravel b ank within a nd two d itches o utside ( Ramm 1 957). Mr . H . G . R amm d ates t he f ort t o t he v ery e nd o f t he t hird o r b eginning o f t he f ourth c entury. T his f ort, with i ts t hick d efensive wall, i nternal b ank a nd a rea o f a bout 4 .4 ha, i s p ossibly s imilar t o t hat a t P iercebridge . B oth f orts may b e c ontemporary , a s h as b een t hought f or t he l ast 3 0 y ears, t hough t his would n ow i nvolve d ating Newton K yme t o c irca A D 2 70 . T he s tone wall a t L ittlechester i s s ecurely d ated t o t he v ery l ate t hitd c entury o r l ater . C oins o f T etricus a nd C arausius o ccurred i n t he c onstruction l ayer o f m ortar a nd c hippings 1 973) .
T he
l ate d efences
o n t he b erm
f ound o n t he e astern s ide o f
( Green C .J .
t he f ort n ear
t he s outh-east a ngle , c onsisted o f a s tone wall c irca 3 m t hick . T his h ad b een i nserted i nto t he e arlier r ampart, t he r esultant s poil b eing u sed t o f ill t he i nner d itch, a nd a n ew i nner d itch was c ut o n a l ine l ittle d ifferent f rom t hat o f i ts p redecessor . C oins f rom G allienus t o Carausius were f ound i n i ts l owest f illing . O n t he s outh d efences,
W ebster d id n ot
f ind e vidence f or a r ampart b ut i ts a bsence
6 9
was n ot p roven ( Webster G . a nd H artley 1 961, 8 9) . T he c oins f rom t he g eneral a rea o f L ittlechester u p t o 1 965 f all i nto t wo m ain g roups f rom D omitian t o C ommodus a nd f rom C arausius t o C onstans 1 967).
( Brassington
A n e arly f ourth-century d ate h as b een i nferred f or t he r eoccupation o f t he f ort a t P apcastle a fter i t h ad l ain a bandoned f or much, i f n ot a ll, o f t he t hird c entury. P rior t o r ebuilding, t he s ite had b een t horoughly
l evelled
( Charlesworth
1 965) .
C ollingwood
i nvestigated
t he
t win-portal e ast g ate o f t his l ate f ort s et i nto t he 2 .74m t hick f ort wall a nd h e a lso f ound a t ower i n t he n orth-east a ngle . T he i nternal b uildings a ssociated w ith t he l ate f ort w ere o f s tone . O ne b arrackb lock was f ound which s howed e vidence o f r epair o r r ebuilding; t he t hreshold a nd r ubble r emains o f a f oundation f or a n e ast-west wall c ontained n umerous f ragments o f b ronze , s ome o f t hem i dentifiable a s s cale a rmour ( fig 4 7.3). A n L-shaped b uilding t o t he west was p robably a nother b arrack-block . T he
o utpost
f ort
o f
H igh
R ochester
r eceived
i ts
t hird s tone wall a nd
a t l east two n ew g ates a t t his t ime . I n t he n orth-west a ngle t he wall , w ith i ts a ssociated t ower ( fig 2 3 .2) o f m assive masonry s et o n a d ifferent c urve t han i ts predecessor, h ad l acing s tones t o prevent s ubsidence . T he west g ate w as c ontemporary t hough a t e arlier s tone walls o f p eriods I II a nd I V w ere a bsent .
t he g ate , t he T he p eriod V
s tone wall, a lthough o nly c irca 1 .52m t hick, was b uilt o f massive c ourses a nd i n o ne s ection o n t he n orth wall n one was l ess t han 3 0cm h igh . T he i nterval-tower , west o f l ower p ortion f illed with e arth . s outh
t ower was
t he s outh g ate , e vidently had i ts A t t he west g ate ( fig 2 1.3) t he
f ounded o n a c ourse o f r e-used s tones,
a s was
t he
c urtain wall, whilst t he n orth t ower was f ounded o n r ough-quarried r ubble s et h erringbone-wise i n s tiff y ellow c lay. T he s inglep ortalled g ate was d eeply r ecessed b ehind t he f ort wall . T he n orth g ate , w hich w as r ecessed 2 .28m f rom t he o uter f ace o f t he f ort wall , h ad n o g uardchamber o n i ts e ast s ide - t he west s ide h ad b een d estroyed - R ichmond s uggested t hat i t m ay h ave b een s urmounted b y a t ower o ver t he p ortal . F rom 1 9th-century o bservations, t he s outh g ate w ould s eem t o h ave b een o f a s imilar t ype ( Richmond 1 936 ) . A t R isingham, t he west g ate was i nserted i nto t he S everan wall when t he p rincipia was t urned t o f ace west . T he s ingle-portal g ate h ad t wo
i nternal
g uardchambers
b uilt
o f
l arge
m asonry
( fig
2 0 .4 )
a nd
t he
i mpost m oulding h ere was o f s imilar s tyle t o t hat a t t he w est g ate o f H igh R ochester . A t t he s outh g ate ( fig 1 7 .5) t he e ast p rojecting t ower w as r econstructed p robably u sing e arlier m asonry . T he u se o f t ombstones t o r epair t he n orth-east a ngle-tower c ould p ossibly d ate t o t his t ime . T he e ast wall h ad b een r ebuilt a lmost f rom i ts f oundations; t he e xcavator d ated t his t o t he t ime o f C onstantius C hlorus
o r
( Birley E .
l ater . 1 961,
S ome
t ombstones
w ere u sed
i n t his
r econstruction
2 37).
T he e ast g ate a t O ld P enrith i s o f u nusual p lan, t he f ort w all being i nturned a t t he g ate. N o d ating e vidence f or t his g ate i s known , t hough t he m onumental s tyle o f m asonry u sed s uggests a c omparison w ith t he S everan s outh g ate a t R isingham a nd
t he C onstantian west g ates
a t
R isingham a nd H igh R ochester . N ew walls were a lso b uilt a t t he a uxiliary f orts o f B ainbridge a nd p erhaps C astell C ollen . A t t he f ormer s ite, f or s ome t ime i n t he
7 0
t hird c entury,
t he f ort's e ast w all w as r uinous.
T his w as r ebuilt
a nd a n ew e ast g ate ( fig 2 0 .3) b uilt t o t he n orth o f t he e arlier p orta praetoria . T he n ew wall h ad b een i nserted i nto t he f ront o f t he r ampart a nd l ay s lightly b ehind t he p osition o f t he e arlier wall. T he wall, l ike t he g ate , w as b uilt o f r oughly-trimmed , f ine-grained s andstone b locks . I n t he f oundations o f t he wall , t he l atest s herd was f rom a c olour-coated b eaker w ith r ough r ouletting ( Hartley 1 960 , 1 10 ) . R e-used i n t he f irst r oad o utide t he e ast g ate was a S everan b uilding i nscription ( Hartley 1 961) w hilst b eneath t his e arlier s urface i n t he e ast g ate were f ound o ne c oin o f C laudius I I a nd t hree r adiates, o ne b arbarous . F rom b eneath t his r oad o n t he c auseway a cross t he d itch c ame a D omitianic c oin a nd o ne p robably o f T etricus I ( Droop a nd J ones 1 929,
2 44 ) .
T he e ast g ate w as s ingle-portalled w ithout g uardchambers .
A t C astell C oh en, t he n orth wall may have b een r ebuilt s lightly t o t he s outh o f t he e arlier w all . T he p robable r obber t rench d oes n ot l ie a bove t he e arlier wall . N o t race o f t his p ossible l ate wall r emained b eyond a j umble o f r oughly-spilt s tones i n l oose s oil a t t he b ottom o f t he r obber t rench, b ut i f t his d oes r epresent t he l ine o f t he l ate wall, i t h ad n o p roper f oundations ( Alcock 1 964, 7 3). T he r ampart b ank m ay a lso h ave b een h eightened a t t his t ime . T he p eriod 5 A n orth-east g ate a t Malton ( fig 2 1.4A) was d ated b y C order t o n ot e arlier t han t he e nd o f t he t hird c entury. I t c onsisted o f a s ingle-portal g ate, 3 .35m wide, f lanked b y i nternal g uardchambers
1 .83m wide
a nd
6 .1m
a part .
A h eavily-rutted
c oncrete
r oad r an t hrough t he g ate which was b uilt mainly o f r e-used s tone ( Corder 1 930, 4 7-8). T he p lan o f t he K nag B urn g ateway ( fig 2 1.1), i nserted i n H adrian's Wall a l ittle t o t he e ast o f H ousesteads, h as b een c ompared with t he n orth-east g ate a t Malton . L ittle d ating e vidence i s k nown , C layton h aving c leared t he r emains i n 1 856 , b ut h z d oes r ecord f inding c oins o f C laudius I I a nd C onstantius ( Clayton 1 855-8, 1 86 ) . T he g ate p assage was a rched a t b oth e nds a nd R ichmond n oted t hat i t h ad b een p rovided w ith g ates a t f ront a nd r ear . I n t he H andbook h e c ompares t he g ateway t o t hat a t G emellae o n t he F ossatum A fricae
d iscovered
( Richmond
1 957,
i n
1 954
which
a lso
h ad
g ates
f ront
a nd
b ack
1 18) .
A t I lkely, b y o r i n t he e arly f ourth c entury, t he n orth g ate-towers s eem t o h ave b een d emolished a nd t he r ampart b ank h ad c ertainly b een r emoved b y t his d ate . A p ossible i nterval-tower , e ast o f t he n orth g ate, was a lso d emolished . A s t he f ort wall was s till o nly 1 .52m t hick, t he e xcavator s uggested t hat t he p arapet walk must have b een c arried o n b rackets a nd h ave oversailed t he i nner f ace o f t he wall ( Hartley 1 966, 3 8). I n t he l ate t hird c entury o r f irst half o f t he f ourth c entury, t he e ast g ate a t D oncaster was b locked b y a wall 2m wide
b uilt
a cross
i t
( Buckland a nd Magilton
1 976).
E arly i n t he
f ourth c entury t he A ntonine r ampart was s everely r educed i n h eight a nd p artly o verlain b y a r ough i ntervallum r oad ( Buckland 1 973). B oth p ortals o f t he s outh g ate a t C arrawburgh m ay h ave b een b locked a t t his t ime a nd a b road, p robably l ate d itch , c ontinued a cross t he p osition o f t he s outh g ate without i nterruption ( Breeze 1 972, 1 15-6) . T he s outh p ortal o f t he w est g ate a t H ousesteads i s t hought t o h ave b een b locked
u nder
C onstantius .
A t B irdoswald , i n r uins w as
t he n orth g uardchamber o f
t he e ast g ate which h ad b een
c ompletely r ebuilt a nd t he a shlar f acing o f
7 1
t he wall was
c arried r ight a cross t he p osition o f t he o riginal d oorway . A n ew d oorway was p rovided i n t he s outh w all o pening i nto t he p ortal , a nd a r ough f lagged f loor was p laced i n t he c hamber 9 1cm a bove t he o riginal g round-floor l evel ( Gillam 1 950 , 6 7) . D aniels s uggests t hat i t was a t t his t ime t hat t he n orth p ortal was b locked a nd t hat p ossibly a h ypocaust was i nserted i nto t he s outh g uardroom ( Daniels 1 978A , 2 01) . O n t he s outh a nd e ast d efences t he r ampart b ank w as c ut l evel t o f orm w hat t he e xcavators c alled a c ooking s helf o r b ench , s teeply r evetted a t t he b ack i n s tone. T his r esulted i n t he p rovision o f ar ampart walk 4 m wide , a llowing f or a 6 0cm p arapet b acked b y a c ooking s helf o f a bout
3 .4m
( Simpson F .
a nd R ichmond
1 933 ,
2 61) .
O n t his
s helf were
f ound o vens, t he o ne b y t he s outh-east a ngle-tower b eing a f ine s tone-built s tructure w hich b locked t he d oorway i nto t he t ower . T he s helf was a c onstant f eature b etween t he a ngle-tower a nd t he p orta q uintana d extra . A t H ousesteads,
i t
m ay h ave b een i n t he e arly f ourth c entury when
major r ebuilding work was c arried o ut o n t he s outh and e ast walls, e specially a t t he s outh-east a ngle; l arge a shlar b locks were u sed i n t his
l ate r epair .
B ehind t he n orth wall t o t he e ast
o f
t he g ate ,
a t
o r b efore t he b eginning o f t he f ourth c entury, t he w estern e nd o f t he workshop a rea was a bandoned a nd a n ew r ampart e rected o ver i t, 4 m w ide a nd e xtending
um e ast f rom t he g ate-tower .
I t was r evetted b y a
s tone k erb t o t he s outh a long t he i ntervallum r oad a nd b y a wall a cross t he w orkshop a rea ( Daniels 1 9808,10 ) . H ousesteads i s p erhaps u nusual i n h aving i ts n orth r ampart b ank r econstituted a t t his t ime . A t o ther s ites s uch a s D oncaster a nd I lkely, t he r ampart a reas were b eing e ncroached o n b y b uildings o r b y t he v ia s agularis. I n t he n orth-east p raetentura a t Wallsend , t he r ampart b ank was r evetted b y a s tone k erb o f two p eriods, t he l ater o f which was o f l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury d ate ( Daniels 1 976 ) .
I n
t he
l ater s econd o r
e arly
t hird c entury ,
m any
m ilecastle
g ateways
h ad b een r educed t o p osterns a nd i t h as b een s uggested t hat t his m ay h ave b een r elated t o t he p ossible a bandonment o f t he o utpost f orts u nder C ommodus
( Daniels
o nly s eems t o have b een r ough m asonry without ( Simpson F . 1 976, 9 0). f loor a nd t hreshold were r ebuilt
( fig 2 1.2).
1 978A ,
2 5) .
T he s outh g ate a t
m ilecastle
4 0
s o r educed p erhaps a c entury l ater . V ery f oundations n arrowed t he p assage t o 1 .01m A t milecastle 5 2, t he n orth postern g ate's r aised ; t he s outh g ate , h owever , w as t otally
A p air o f s tone-lined h oles was d ug a bout h alf
way t hrough t he g ate p assage ,
c lose t o t he p assage w alls a nd c onnected
b y a s hallower s lot w hich c ontained t umbled r ubbish a nd a lso m uch i ron s trapping f or t he h eavy o ak d oor o f which t races r emained . T he s lot a cross t he p assageway h ad b een r obbed o f w hatever i t h ad c ontained a nd was o verlain b y a l ater r oad s urface. T he p ost-holes had b een d ug i nto t he s tone f ootings s o t hat t he p osts would b e u p a gainst t he p assage walls.
T he e xcavator s uggested t hat t hese h oles c ould n ot
h ave b een i ntended t o h old t imbers a s t hey w ere a bout 6 1cm s quare a nd were t hus m ore l ikely t o h ave h eld l arge s tone d oorposts w ith a t hreshold o f
s tone b etween,
i ntended t o s upport
a f lat
a rch with
p robably a r elieving a rch a bove . H e c ompares t his s tyle o f c onstruction w ith t hat f irst s een o n A urelian's Wall i n R ome a nd t hus d ates t he w ork t o C onstantius C hlorus . T he s outh g ate o f m ilecastle 5 1 was o f t he s ame t ype - here t he t hreshold s lot h ad b een c ut i nto t he l iving r ock ( Simpson F . a nd R ichmond 1 935 , 2 52-5) .
7 2
A t
o nly
t hree
military
s ites
i n
B ritain
i s
t here
e vidence
o f
a n
a ttempt t o u pdate t he d efences t o t he n ew s tyles b eing employed o n t he C ontinent a nd o n t he S axon S hore. A t t he p ossible n aval b ase o f B rough-on-Humber , t he r ebuilding o f t he d efences i n s tone , which h ad b een b egun i n t he l ate t hird c entury, was c ompleted a fter a p robable c essation i n t he work f or a s hort p eriod .
T he i ncomplete i nternal
g uardrooms o f t he n orth g ate were d emolished a nd r eplaced b y a nother , m uch b etter b uilt, a nd p rojecting t owers were a dded ( fig 2 0 .2A , W acher 1 969,3-4). F or t he s econd t ime i n i ts h istory,
t he l egionary f ortress a t Y ork h ad
m uch o f i ts d efensive wall r ebuilt f rom t he f oundations a nd o nly t he wall and t owers b etween t he n orth-east a nd s outh-east g ates o f t he S everan p eriod r emained ( RCHM Y ork 1 , 1 0). T he n ew wall i s a bout 1 .52m t hick a nd s tands t o a maximum h eight o f 5 .18m . I t i s c haracterised b y i ts t ile-bonding c ourses a t 2 .13-2.44m a bove t he f oundations a nd t here a re f ragmentary r emains o f a t ile s tring c ourse m arking t he p arapet walk l evel . E xcavations i n 1 969 o n t he n orthw est wall i n t he p ublic l ibrary g ardens l ed t he e xcavator t o d ate t he w all t o t he S everan p eriod , a lthough i t h ad t ile-bonding c ourses . I n t he wall's c onstruction t rench, t he f illing c onsisted mainly o f F lavian p ottery b ut a lso a f ew s herds which m ay d ate t o t he m id-second c entury ( Radley 1 972, 4 0). T he r ampart b ank s eems t o h ave b een h eightened a nd e xtended b ut was s till m uch l ower t han t he p arapet walk ( Butler 1 971B, 9 7). E xcept f or o n t he s outh-west s ide o f t he f ortress, a ll t he n ew t owers were i nternal a nd r ectangular ( fig 2 4 .18) a nd were s lightly l arger t han t he S everan t owers which s urvive . I nterval-tower N W3 r etained i ts u pper s torey i nto t he 1 9th c entury a nd w as r ecorded b y W ellbelloved . T he t ower o versailed t he f ortress wall a nd a t t he u pper l evel i t measured a bout 3 .96m s quare i nternally. T he f ro t a nd i n i t s ills o f s uggested
wall s urvived t o a height o f 1 .52m a bove t he p arapet walk was a n o pening , p robably o riginally d ivided i nto t wo . T he t hese window o penings were worn i nto c hannels a nd i t i s t hat t his was t he r esult o f t he u se o f s wivelling b allistae
( RCHM Y ork 1 ,
2 7).
T he n orth-west g ate was c ontemporary with t he
w all a nd h ad i nternal g ate-towers o nly p rojecting 6 1cm i n f ront o f t he w all l ine, i ts m onumental c haracter b eing emphasised b y t he u se o f v ery l arge b locks o f g ritstone . T he
t owers
a nd p robably
t he
t otally d ifferent c haracter.
g ate
o n
t he
s outh-west
wall were
o f
S ix p olygonal p rojecting i nterval-
t owers a re known a nd t wo a ngle-towers. T he s outh-west g ate was p robably f lanked b y two s imilar t owers. I nterval t ower S W5 ( fig 211A ) h as b een e xtensively e xcavated r ecently ( Wenham 1 965; S umpter a nd C oll 1 976) . I t measured 2 0 .2m l ong , o f w hich a bout 5 m p rojected b eyond t he c urtain w all a nd was 9 .4m w ide; i t was d ivided i nto t hree l arge c hambers b y two c ross walls; very l ittle o f t he s uperstructure s urvived . T he t ower w as i rregularly s et o ut , m ost o f t he walls b eing o f d ifferent t hicknesses, a nd s ome b eing p laced o n t he v ery e dge o f t he f oundations o nly a pproximately 9 0° t o t heir n eighbours.
t wo o f t he walls l ay a t N o e vidence was f ound t o
s uggest f or w hat p urpose t hese g round-floor c hambers were u sed . M uch
o f
t he west
a ngle-tower
( fig
2 3 .1B) s urvives;
i t
p rojects
1 1 .16m
b eyond t he f ort w all . T he r ear c ompartment o f t he t ower e xtends b ack 1 0 .62m a nd i s 1 3 .42m wide , b isected b y a s pine wall 9 1cm t hick . T he p rojecting t ower w alls a re 1 .52m t hick, b eing r educed b y a s carcement
7 3
a t
4 .57m
a bove
t he
g round
t o
9 9cm .
I n
e ach
f ace
o f
t he
t ower
a djacent t o t he f ort wall , i s a w indow s played f rom 1 .52m i nside t o a width o f p robably 3 1cm. B oth windows b egin 1 .22m b elow t he s carcement l evel a nd a re a t l east 2 .18m h igh . T he p roportions o f t he t ower would s uggest a t l east t hree s toreys ( RCHM Y ork 1 , 1 4). T he p arapet walk was c ontinued a cross
t he t ower b y
t wo a rches.
T he
f loor i n t he f ront c hamber o f t he s outh a ngle-tower was c overed w ith e arth p robably v ery s oon a fter i t had b een made, and t hen a c lay f illing was i nserted ( Stead 1 956-8, 5 19). R aine t hought t hat t he Multangular T ower h ad b een s olidified a nd s trengthened i n a s imilar w ay,
t he f illing h aving b een r emoved i n
1 831
( Raine
1 932,
5 6 ) .
T here i s n o e vidence f rom which t o d ate t hese d efences c losely b ut t hey a re g enerally a ssigned t o t he t ime o f C onstantius C hlorus c ertainly t hey a re o f l ate t hird-century d ate a t t he e arliest . T hird c entury p ottery h as b een f ound i n t he c ontemporary r ampart b ank a nd t he d itch a t t he w est a ngle h ad l ater t hird a nd f ourth-century p ottery i n i ts p rimary f ill ( Miller 1 928 , 8 1-82) . T he t owers h ave b een d ated s tylistically t o c irca A D 3 00 ( Butler 1 971B, 1 06) w ho maintains t hat p olygonal t owers were o nly i n v ogue a round t his d ate. O ne o f t he s ites h e u ses a s e vidence f or t his - K aiseraugst - may n ow, o n n umimatic e vidence, b e d ated t o t he t ime o f C onstantine ( Johnson J . 1 976B). I n Wenham's e xcavations o n t he s outh-west wall, h e f ound s ix s tructural p hases, p eriod V b eing t he p rovision o f a wall with p rojecting t owers . P eriod V I, a n a ddition t o t he r ampart , w as d ated b y a c oin o f D elmatius t o a fter A D 3 35-7 . " It s hould b e s tressed, however,
t hat
t his
b uilding
phase
( period
V )
i s
n ot
l inked
unequivocably b y l iterary a nd/or a rchaeological e vidence t o t hese y ears:
i t c ould b e l ater" .
H e s uggests t hat h is p eriod V a rc ! V I m ay
b elong t o t he s ame c onstructional p hase A t C hester,
( Wenham
1 965 ,
6 ) .
i t h as b een g enerally a ccepted t hat t he n orth a nd west
walls were r econstructed . p arapet-walk h eight e ast o f
T he s upposed l ate-Roman wall s tands t o t he n orth g ate ; t his s ection o f t he w all
i s o f o ne b uild f rom i ts f oundations u p a nd i s t wice t he t hickness o f t he e arlier f ortress w all . T o t he w est o f t he n orth g ate , a wall o f s imilar c onstruction , b ut o nly 1 .22m t hick, had b een a dded t o t he f ront
o f
a n e xisting wall .
T he ' Roman' wall t o t he e ast o f t he g ate i s o f c urious c onstruction a nd i ts n orth f ace i s b attered . I t h as b een s uggested t hat t his w as t o a llow t he p arapet walk t o r etain i ts e arlier p osition ( Webster G . 1 953, 2 3), p resumably a llowing t he i nterval-towers t o r etain t heir p osition r elative t o t he p arapet walk . H owever , i f t he wall h ad b een i n
s uch
a s tate
f oundations,
i t
o f i s
d isrepair u nlikely
t hat
t hat
i t
h ad
t he t owers
t o
b e
r ebuilt
f rom
t he
w ould h ave b een i n a r e-
u seable c ondition . A t o ther f orts where t he walls were e xtensively r ebuilt, n ew t owers were a lso c onstructed a s, f or e xample, a t High R ochester , L anchester a nd Y ork . T he wall b uilders m ade u se o f m any t ombstones a nd s culptured b locks which were r e-used t hroughout t he wall's
h eight
a nd
t hickness
( Matthews-Jones
1 888 ,
o pposite
1 a nd
4 ) .
T he l atest d atable r e-used p iece was o f t he e arly t hird c entury ( RIB 4 88) . O n t his e vidence a nd o n h istorical g rounds, t he r ebuilt n orth wall h as b een d ated t o t he t ime o f C onstantius C hlorus .
7 4
T his d ating h as b een c alled i nto q uestion b y McPeake . H e n otes t he u nusual m ethod o f c onstruction - t he wall b uilt without m ortar w ith i ts i nterstices f illed with b lack s oil a nd t he way t hat west o f t he n orth g ate i t m erely l eans b ack a gainst a n e arlier wall . H e s uggests t hat a s t he wall i s b attered, i t c ould well h ave b een b uilt i n t he m edieval p eriod s ince b attered walls a re r are i n t he A ncient World b ut a re more c ommonly f ound d esigned a gainst a ttack b y g unpowder a rtillery . A c ornice s tone , i dentical t o t hose s till i n s itu i n t he n orth wall, was f ound i n ap it c utting i nto a r oad s urface o f f ifthc entury d ate which p robably r emained i n u se m uch l ater . A s t he s tone a ppears t o b e unweathered, h e s uggests t hat i ts b urial p resumably d ates f rom t he c onstruction o f t he wall r ather t han i t d emolition . T here
i s
m uch
e vidence
a ccumulating
f or
t he
d estruction o f b uildings
o ver l arge a reas o f t he f ortress w hich c ontinued t hereafter t o r emain u noccupied b y p ermanent s tructures. M cPeake d oubts t hat a g reatly s trengthened n orth w all would b e b uilt a t t his t ime . I n A bbey G reen , t he i nterval-tower's s outh wall a nd s outh-east c orner s eem t o have b een d eliberately d emolished a round AD 3 00 . H e c onnects t his with t he p ossible f illing i n o f t he r ecut d itch a t L inenhall S treet with r ubble ,
p robably f rom t he d emolition o f a s tretch o f
t he west wall .
T here i s n othing u nusual a bout t he r e-use o f t ombstones, a ltars a nd a rchitectural f ragments i n f ort a nd t own d efences; among e xamples i n B ritain may b e c ited t he r e-use o f a n a ltar i n t he e ast g ate a t L ympne , a rchitctural f ragments i n t he l ower west g ate a t L incoln a nd t ombstones
i n
t he
f ort w all a t R isingham .
O n t he C ontinent ,
u se o f
s uch material i s e xtremely c ommon , e specially i n t he l ater t hird c entury . T hese b locks a re o ften l aid w ithout m ortar , t hough t hey d o t end t o b e u sed o nly i n t he l ower c ourses o f t he walls .
O n t he western d efences a t C hester , t he e xcavators ( Thompson F . 1 969 ; P etch D . u npublished) f ound e vidence o f as trengthening o f t he 1 .52m t hick T rajanic wall which h ad b een t hickened b y t he a ddition o f m aterial o n i ts e astern s ide , p roducing a n ew wall a bout 3 .35m t hick . T his l ater work was s et 3 0cm h igher t han t he o riginal wall. O ne t ombstone was f ound r e-used i n t he l owest c ourse o f t his wall . I t was s uggested t hat t he r eason f or t he t hickening o f t he wall o n t he i nside was t hat, a s t he d itch l ay immediately west o f t he T rajanic w all , i t w as p resumbly t hought e asier t o r emove s ome o f t he r ampart r ather t han b uild o ver t he u nstable d itch f ill . A s hallow d itch was d ug i nto t he f ill o f t he p rimary d itch a nd a d ate o f c irca A D 3 00 was s uggested f or t his. L ittle e vidence was f ound t o d ate t hese m odifications t hough t hey c learly p re-date a k iln t hought t o b e o f m edieval d ate which h ad b een s et i nto t he west f ace o f t he wall . T his m ethod o f s trengthening t he t hin walls o f e arly R oman d efences i s f airly c ommon ; f or e xample , t he l egionary f ortresses a t S trasbourg, P otaissa i n D acia ( Cätänicia 1 981, 4 6 ) a nd N ovae i n Moesia ( Crow 1 981, 6 6 ) a nd t he walls o f t he f ort a t R emagen i n G ermany 1 97).
I n B ritain,
t he n orth a nd west
walls
( Petrikovits
1 971,
o f t he e arly s econd-
c entury f ort a t C ripplegate , L ondon , were t hickened t he f ort w as i ncorpoated i n t he d efensive c ircuit o f
e xternally w hen t he t own i n t he
l ate s econd c entury ( Marsden P . 1 980 , 1 25) . S trickland h as s uggested t hat t he s outh a nd w est walls o f t he f ortress m ay h ave b een r edundant b y A D 3 00 i f t he d efended a rea n ow i ncluded t he s ettlements b etween t he f ortress a nd t he r iver, T here i s s ome e vidence f or t his a rea h aving b een d efended i n t he t hird c entury ( Strickland 1 981B, 4 32).
7 5
A wide d ate r ange f rom t he mid-third c entury t ill well i nto t he medieval o r e ven t he p ost-medieval p eriod c an b e s uggested f or t he n orth wall. I n A bbey G reen, a t t he l evel o f t he b ase o f t he R oman r ampart, n o t race o f a ny wall was f ound , t he p resent m asonry o nly b eginning a t a m uch h igher l evel . T hat t here was m uch R oman m aterial a round i n t he medieval p eriod which c ould b e u sed i n b uilding t he d efences i s c lear f rom a p assage b y R alph H igden w ho wrote i n t he t ime o f
E dward
a ncient s treets" T he
l ine
I ,
mentioning
f amous
p ersons
( Shrubsole o f
t he
1 890 ,
R oman
" Huge
s tones
e ngraven
a nd t he r emains o f
with
t he n ames
o f
g randiose b uilding a nd
1 09) . western
d efences
medieval walls s urviving t oday.
was
n ot
f ollowed
b y
t he
T races o f what were t hought t o b e
t he A ethelflaedan d efences w ere f ound o n t he s ame l ine b ut t hese would s eem t o h ave b een o f t imber . I t i s d ifficult t o e nvisage w ho c ould have s trengthened t he R oman west wall i f i t was n ot t he Romans t hemselves. A t p resent t he d ate o f t he s o-called R oman n orth wall a nd t he modifications t o t he west wall i s u nclear b ut i f t he l atter d oes t urn o ut t o b e o f R oman d ate , t his m ay s uggest t hat t he s ections o f t he n orth wall o f s imilar t hickness a nd c ontaining o nly material a re b roadly c ontemporary .
Roman
F ort
l ittle
d itches
d ating
t o
t he e arly f ourth c entury
g enerally s how
d ifference f rom e arlier o nes . T he v ery w ide a nd d eep d itch f ound b y S teer a t t he e ast a ngle o f B inchester i s p erhaps e arlier t han t he f ourth c entury i n d ate ,
t hough h e s uggests t he p ossibility t hat
d ate t o C onstantius C hlorus .
i t m ay
T he s imilar d itch a t Malton d ates t o
t he e arly s econd c entury w hilst a t L ancaster t he o nly f eature d ating t o t he e arly f ourth c entury i s ad itch which c uts t hrough t he bathh ouse , p robably b elonging t o t he p raetorium . T his d itch i s u nlikely t o b e a ssociated w ith t he W ery W all a s i t d oes n ot r un p arallel t o i t ( see p lan i n L eather t hird t o
1 973;
c f
P otter
1 974B).
I t
c ontained
l ate
m id f ourth-century p ottery .
When Wilkes wrote h is a rticle e ntitled ' Early F ourth C entury R ebuilding i n H adrian's Wall F orts' , h e d escribed t he p rincipia a t C hesterholm a nd R isingham a s b eing c ompletely r ebuilt a t t his t ime a nd d rew a ttention t o t heir s imilarity i n p lan with p rincipia o f a much e arlier d ate . H e a lso d iscussed t he c hanges made t o t he e arlier principia a t H ousesteads, H igh R ochester a nd S outh S hields ( Wilkes 1 966). I n most c ases t here i s v ery l ittle e vidence t o d ate t hese c hanges t o t he e arly f ourth c entury . S outh S hields i s n ow k nown t o h ave b een a bandoned a t l east b y t he a rmy a t t his d ate; C hesterholm 's ' Constantian' p rincipia p robably d ates t o t he t hird c entury, p erhaps c irca A D 2 20 o r 2 70 .
O nly
i n t he
c ase o f R isingham a nd p erhaps
H igh
R ochester c an W ilkes' c onclusions b e a ccepted . A t t he f ormer s ite , t he p rincipia ( fig 3 5.1) was t urned f rom f acing s outh t o f ace west . T he p lan ,
a s r estored b y R ichmond f rom t he i nformation p rovided b y t he
e xcavations o f b uildings. A n
1 849, i s p robably s imilar t o t hat o f e arlier s uch a edes w ith a s unken s trongroom a nd t he b asilica were
f ound b ut l ittle e lse; t he c ourtyard m ay n ot h ave b een p resent . T he e ntrance i nto t he b asilica - p robably o n t he m ain a xis o f t he b uilding - was f lanked b y walls c irca 6 .4m a part, a g ap w hich was n arrowed b y t wo s quare b ases i nterpreted b y R ichmond a s p ossibly f or s tatues o f D iocletian a nd Maximianus . t he n orth o f
Two d oorways l eading f rom t he b asilica t o
t he a edes s uggest t hat t here h ad b een t he n ormal r ange o f
7 6
f ive r ooms a t b een t he W ilkes
t he r ear o f
t he b uilding a nd t races o f what may have
t ribunal were a lso f ound
n oted
t hat
( Richmond
1 940 ,
1 10-12) .
a s H igh R ochester was a bandoned well b efore A D
t he p lan o f t he p rincipia we have will r epresent c entury phase.
3 67 ,
t he e arly f ourth-
T his i s e ven more t rue t oday i f C asey i s c orrect i n
s uggesting t hat t he f ort was a bandoned b y C onstantine c irca AD 3 12. T he building,
o f n ormal p lan
( fig
3 5.2),
a t s ome d ate r eceived
t wo
r ooms added o n t o i ts west s ide with a t l east o ne d oorway p roviding a ccess f rom t he basilica and a h ypocaust had been i nserted i nto t he r oom e ast
o f
t he a edes
( Bruce
1 857) .
T here i s n o way o f
c hanges; i t i s n ot e ven c ertain t hat t he a dded r ooms w ere r etained i n u se i nto t he f ourth c entury. A t
C arrawburgh,
r oom
I V
i n
t he
r ear
r ange
was
d ating
t hese
a nd h ypocaust
p rovided
c hannelled h ypocaust h eated f rom a s toke-hole i n r oom V ,
b ut
with owing
a t o
t he l ack o f p rovision f or a t hrough d raught, t he s ystem s oon s eems t o h ave been a bandoned . I n r oom I I a hypocaust was planned but n ever c ompleted - p erhaps o n t he f ailure o f
t hat
i n r oom I V .
T he e xcavator
s uggested t hat t hese m odifications were c ontemporary with t hose i n t he c ourtyard a nd 1 972, 1 14-5).
d ate t o t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c enturies
A t H ousesteads, p rincipia d ated
t o
B osanquet
( fig t he
3 7 .1) .
e arly
f ound
Many
f ourth
o f
m uch t hese
c entury
n oted a s b eing o f e arlier d ate a t o f t he c ourtyard c olonnades t he r ear o f
d oorway i nto a lso
b ut
a n umber f orts,
t hough
f eatures h ave b een t he walling u p d ated a t
8 and 9 ,
were united a nd t he
T he d oorway i nto 9 w . ,;
i t may n ot b e c ontemporary with t he o ther
l ong s lab
which h ad b een a c ornice was t he new
t hreshold .
s eparating o ff a s trip
c lear
e xistence r oom h ave
1 1
e vidence i n
t he
was
l ate
f ourth
h ad b een r educed ,
b een e ntered
f rom
f ound
1 .22m w ide which W ilkes
f or
a n
u pper
c entury
i f
n ot
s torey
T he
1 1 a nd
T he wall b etween
I n r oom
which
b efore .
t hen b uilt u p a nd r ooms
t he a edes .
a wall
A wall was
s uggested may h ave s upported a s tair-case t o a n u pper f loor . 1 2,
r e-used
r educed f rom 2 .57m t o 1 .52m ,
b eing built o n t he s outhern e nd o f 8 /9 ,
t he
A t s ome p eriod t he s outhern r ooms
a s a t hreshold a nd t he d oorway was i nserted i nto r oom
o f
i n
c onventionally
t o f orm s torerooms a nd a rmouries,
t he p rincipia, n umbers
A 2 .13m
a lterations were
n otably
8 f rom t he L asilica was b locked .
r emodelled,
a lterations .
f or
a lterations
o ther
C arrawburgh t o t he s econd c entury . a t
e vidence
( Breeze
was
i n
d oorway
o f
1 2 must
r ooms
1 1
t hen
a nd
1 2
c onsisted o f v ery p oor r ubble w ork p ierced b y t wo d oorways which t he e xcavator p resumed w ere o f d ifferent p eriods ( Bosanquet 1 904, 2 08-28) . I n r ooms
1 1 a nd
1 2 were f ound a n umber o f b ox t iles
( ibid 2 22) .
A t Bewcastle, f ollowing t he p robably e nemy d estruction i n t he l ate t hird c entury, t he r ubbish which f illed t he c ellar i n t he a edes was l eft
i n
c ontinued
t he t o
n orth
c ompartment
s erve a s
t o
a s hallow p it,
h igh a nd a f lagged f loor a t
i ts
b ase .
a d epth
o f
a bout
r eceiving a n ew I n
t he
s outh
1 .22m.
f ront
I t
wall
c ompartment,
6 1cm t he
r ubbish was l eft u ndisturbed a nd a bove i t was p laced a f illing o f s tones and s tiff y ellow c lay s upporting a n ew a nd wide s tone s carcement . T his f illing i ncluded a n a ltar d ated b y t he e xcavators t o t he t hird c entury which
t hey
t hought had b een burnt
i n t he l ate
t hird-century d isaster a nd t hen r e-used b efore b eing p laced i n t he f illing . e nd o f
I f
t he b urning
t he t hird c entury,
i s
t o
b e
a ssociated
t hen t he f illing i s
7 7
w ith
t he
t rouble
a t
t he
p resumably l ater i n d ate
t han C onstantius C hlorus.
I n t he r econstruction o f t he p rincipia,
t he e ntrance t o t he a edes was a ltered, s tone was
l aid,
a n ew t hreshold o f r e-used
a nd t he 3 .2m wide e ntrance was
n arrow r ough walls - p erhaps f oundations H odgson a nd S t . J oseph 1 938 , 2 09-10) . R epair work o n t he p rincipia a t a t
s ome
d ate b etween A D
c entury
a t
B irdoswald
2 96 a nd 3 05
B rough-on-Noe,
t he
f or
( RIB
A ntonine
r educed t o 1 .32m b y
s tone
i s
a ttested
1 912) .
s tone
s creens
I n
( Richmond ,
e pigraphically
t he e arly
p rincipia
f ourth
s eems
t o
h ave
been d emolished and r eplaced b y a wattle-and-daub s tructure o f t he s ame plan o n s tone s ill walls ( Jones G . a nd Wild 1 969A). T he s trongroom within t he p rincipia a t Reculver had i ts c oncrete f loor d estroyed p laster,
a nd
i t
g lass
r adiates
was
a nd
( Philp
f illed
with
c oins,the
1 961).
t ile
a nd
r ubble
including
wall
l atter b eing m ostly l ate t hird-century
Mr.
C .M.
D aniels
has
suggested
t hat
s trongrooms m ay h ave b een d eemed u nnecessary a t t his t ime w hen much o f t he s oldiers' c ash wage was I n
t he
r ear
r ange
o f
c ommuted t o p ayment i n k ind .
r ooms
i n t he p rincipia a t C hester,
e vidence f or s ome b uilding a ctivity,
p erhaps
i n s ome
t here was
c ases d atable t o
t he f ourth c entury ( Petch 1 971, 1 5). At York, the b asilica p rincipiorum h ad b een s hortened i n t he e arly f ourth c entury w hilst t he n orth-west
e nd was
l ath-and-plaster o n
o ccupied b y
p artitions .
t he n orth-west
s ide
o f
small
r ooms
A p ortico
d ivided b y
which
t he b uilding,
was
p ainted p laster c overed t he walls o f o ne o f 1 971,
1 85).
I n t he e xcavations o f
h ad
b oth s tone
f lanked
t he
a nd
s treet
i ncorporated i nto i t;
t he
r esulting r ooms
( Ramm
1 967, Ramm t hought h e h ad f ound
e vidence t o s how t hat t he p rincipia h ad b een s everely burnt a t t he e nd o f t he t hird c entury; i n t he s ubsequent r econstruction , t he n orth-east a isle o f
t he b asilica was
r eplaced
t he p iers
o f
c onverted i nto s mall r ooms whose s ide walls
t he p revious a rcade a nd whose f ronts w ere c losed
b y wooden p artitions
( Ramm
r eceived a s eries
r ectangular b ases
O nly
a t
o f
B rough-on-Noe ,
1 968) .
I lkley,
T he f acade o f
a nd
a t t his
p erhaps
t he b asilica m ay h ave t ime
B inchester
a re p raetoria k nown t o h ave b een b uilt a new .
A t
e arlier
t he
p raetorium
p rincipia .
I n
e ast
s ite
o n
t he
t he
had
p resumbly
e arly
o f
f ourth
t he
S everan
s tood
c entury
t o i t
s tone
( Phillips
was
1 970) .
( Ferris
1 980),
t he f ormer s ite , n orth-west r ebuilt
g ranaries.
o f
t o t he
Little
t he t he
s outh
o f
t he
building was f ound ( fig 4 0 .2) b ut i t p robably c onsisted o f a wattlea nd-daub s uperstructure s et o n s tone s ill walls . I ts i dentification a s a praetorium i s n ot c ertain ( Jones G . a nd Wild 1 969A). H artley
f ound
t hat
t he p raetorium was
t he e arly f ourth c entury, s outh
( fig
4 1A ) .
o f
t wo
A t I lkley,
p eriods.
I n
t he b uilding was e rected a nd p rovided with a
p ortico a long t he v ia p rincipalis, t he
b asically
I ts
a s
was
c ourtyard was
t he
c ontemporary g ranary t o
f lanked b y a s ingle r ange o f
r ooms a nd t he e ntrance , o n i ts west a nd e ast s ides r espectively, a nd b y t wo r anges o f r ooms t o t he s outh a nd p robably a lso t he t he north . The n orthern r ange would have p rojected o nto t he i ntervallum r oad where i ts walls c ould h ave b een t otally r obbed ( Hartley 1 966 , 3 9-40) . I n
o ther
b asically
f orts
p raetoria a re known
s imilar p lans
t o
t hose o f
t o h ave t he
c ontinued
t hird-century
i n u se
with
b uildings.
A t
B irdoswald t he p raetorium was t otally r ebuilt, b ut has n ot y et b een e xcavated .
T he
p raetorium
i nto i ts n orth r ange,
a t
H ousesteads
h ad
a h ypocaust
i nstalled
p robably i n t he e arly f ourth c entury .
Many
p ilae were f ormed f rom p arts o f small c olumns which m ay have s upported
7 8
t he v erandas o f
t he p eriod I a nd I I b arrack-blocks .
e ast e nd o f t he r oom t o t he west was a rea ( Charlesworth 1 975).
A t P apcastle, a
b elonging t o t he p raetorium was
f ound ,
T he f loor a t t he
c ut away t o provide a f urnace b ath-suite c onceivably
b ut o nly t he
l owest
c ourses
o f
i t w alls s et i n mortar s urvived. T he a pse a nd t he r oom t o t he west were f loored with h eavy f lags whilst a water t ank had s tood i n t he middle o f t he r ectangular r oom. r e-used
f ace
d own w hich
1 965, 1 04-5).
was
O ne o f t he f lags was a t ombstone,
p robably
i ts
s econd
r e-use
( Charlesworth
As uite o f heated r ooms f ound a t E bchester ( fig 2 7 .2)
b y t he via p rincipialis may b e o f f ourth-century d ate a nd D odds p art o f
1 964,
1 78).
t he p raetorium b ath-suite b ut,
h ave b een a ligned o n t o
h ave
b een
a n
f ourth c entury, d oorway. 1 968,
A t
o f
i f
s o,
t he v ia principalis .
i nserted
t he s outhern p art
( Reed, Harper
I t was s uggested t hat t his may have f ormed
i ts
b ath-house .
T he
c ourtyard p aved ,
a nd a ssociated with
i s
p erhaps
p raetorium
p robably
t his was
t his t ime t he a ltar o f
t he p raetorium c ould n ot I t
m ore
a t
l ikely
C hester
q uite e arly
h ad
i n
t he
t he f inal b locking o f
o ne
a G reek d octor was
r e-used
( Petch
5 ).
B rough-on-Noe
m ust h ave b een p rovided with n ew g ranaries
i n t he e arly
f ourth c entury, o ne o f which may have b een d iscovered t o t he n orthv e t o f
t he p rincipia i n 1 903 ( Jones G .
a nd Wild 1 969A,
b uilding o n s ite I II i n t he l atera p raetorii a t
I lkely,
1 04).
T he
i nterpreted b y
W oodward a s t he p rincipia, i s n ow t hought t o b e a g ranary c ontemporary with t he praetorium ( fig 2 8.3A) ( Hartley 1 966, 3 9). I t had a b uttressed n orth wall a nd a ttached t o e nclosure d efined b y a s ingle r ow o f
t he r ear o f
l ong s tones
t he b uilding was a n
which was p robably a
yard . A t Whitley C astle t he e xcavator t hought he had f ound a p resumably e arly f ourth-century g ranary . F rom h is s ection , h owever , t he s leeper walls,
which h e a ssociated with
t his b uilding,
would s eem
t o b e o f e arlier d ate ( Shaw 1 959, f ig 2 ). T he i nternal b ath-house a t Bewcastle which must have s urvived t he t roubles o f w ith
s light
R epairs
t he l ate t hird c entury virtually i ntact, m odifications
were
B irdoswald .
a lso
n eeded
e arly i n
A t L eintwardine,
i n
t he
t he a s
f ourth y et
c entury
u nlocated
was r epaired ( Gillam
1 957) .
bath-house
a t
t he e xternal b ath-house i n t he a nnex t o
t he s outh o f t he f ort was d rastically a ltered - s ome o f
t he h ypocausts
were f illed with r ubble and t he r ooms g iven o pus s igninum f loors a s well a s b eing p rovided with n ew
d rains .
T he h eated r ooms
were n ow
b e f ound a t t he e ast e nd o f t he building ( Stanford 1 968).
t o
T he bath-
house beneath t he Mail C oach I nn, excavated i n 1 930 a t Y ork, was t hought t o b e o f l ate d ate d ue t o i ts p osition within t he f ortress a s " Such a p osition would b e i nconsistent with t he l ayout i n t he first a nd s econd c enturies" ( Corder 1 933, p robably
d ates
t o
t he
s econd
c entury
a t
t he
1 5).
l atest .
o f a ny f ortress This b uilding B ath-houses
e arly d ate a re known within o ther l egionary f ortresses,
o f
i ncluding
t hose a t C hester a nd C aerleon . T he s ewer f ound i n C hurch S treet m ay have been d esigned t o s erve t hese baths a t l east i n part ( Whitwell 1 976).
T he p resence o f s everal t iles s tamped I X H ISP u sed i n t he
b uilding would
s uggest
a n e arly d ate f or i t,
whereas
t he o ne s tamped
L EG V I V P i ndicates a d ate i n t he s econd c entury o r l ater f or t he c old b ath wall f rom which i t c ame . At a n umber o f f orts i n northern Britain a nd a t C aernarvon, r emains have b een f ound o f t roop a ccommodation which d iffers markedly f rom t hat o f
t he e arlier t hird c entury.
7 9
I n s ome c ases t hese b uildings,
which h ave b een c hristened c halets, c an b e d ated t o t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c enturies, p resumbly t o t he C onstantian r econstruction , t hough i f C aernarvon was n ot o ccupied a t t his t ime, t hey must b e a l ittle l ater t here . A t H igh R ochester, t hey must d ate t o b efore c irca AD 3 12, i f t he f ort was t hen a bandoned . T he E bchester w ere d ated p robably t o t he l ater t hird c entury .
c halets
o f
T hese b uildings a re d efined a s a r ange o f i ndividual u nits s eparated f rom t heir n eighbours b y a n arrow a lleyway o r e aves d rip. T he e xamples k nown d iffer i n d etail b ut t hey a ll h ave a t l east s ome i solated units. R egular r ows o f s uch i ndividual hutments a re s een within t he l ate Antonine f ort a t Newstead which must h ave b een a variation o n t he s tandard t ype o f b arrack; c halets i n b eing p erfectly r egular . T he
t hey d iffer f rom t he p resence o f b uildings
s imilar t o c halets h as b een n oted i n s econd-century V indonissa a nd i n f ourth-century C arnuntum ( pers. c omm. Mr . C .M. Daniels). T he b uildings r ecently f ound a t C hesterholm h ave s ome f eatures i n c ommon with c halets ( fig . 4 2.2). The f irst c halets were e xcavated a t H igh R ochester ( figs 4 3 .3, 4 4 .1) i n 1 852-55 . O ne b lock was f ound a t G reat C hesters i n 1 894 ( fig 4 3 .2). A t H ousesteads i n 1 898, n umerous t races o f t his t ype o f b uilding were f ound b ut d ue t o t he e xcavation t echnique u sed, n o c omplete p lan o f o ne was h ere v isible . W heeler f ound o ne s uch b uilding i n 1 922 a t C aernarvon ( fig 4 4 .2) a nd c ompared i t w ith t hat a t G reat C hesters . T wo b uildings a t H ousesteads, n umbers X III a nd X IV ( fig 4 3 .1) h ave b een e xtensively e xcavated a nd y ielded c omplete p lans o f t he c halet p hase b uildings. I n b oth c ases, t hese were d ated t o t he C onstantian r ebuilding . I n b uilding X IV , W ilkes f ound o ne l arge r oom o verlying t he e arlier c enturion 's s uite , m easuring i nternally 8 .8 x 9 .1m a nd t o t he west o f i t e ight f urther units. N umber 2 was p robably a k itchen o r w orkroom a ssociated w ith r oom 1 w hilst r oom 9 was p erhaps a l ean-to s hed a gainst i ts n eighbour t o t he e ast. T he o ther s ix u nits w ere i ndividual h utments, t he s outh w alls o f w hich a re g enerally o n t he s ame a lignment . E ach c halet v aries i n i ts s ize a nd i n o ther d etails f rom i ts n eighbours .
I n b uilding X IV n orth walls t o
t he c halet u nit were c onspicuous b y t heir a bsence . B uilding X III a gain h as t he l arge u nit a t t he e astern e nd, h ere w ith a p orch t o t he e ast, whilst t o t he w est a re f ive s eparate u nits . B eyond t hem , t hree r ooms h ave p arty walls which c ould e ither h ave b een p art o f o ne l arge u nit o r h ave r emained s eparate .
D aniels h as a ttempted t o d etermine d ifferent t ypes o f c halet b locks , t hough t his e xercise i s p erhaps n ot p articularly r ewarding a s t he blocks d iffer t o s uch a d egree t hat t he t ypes a re p ossibly m eaningless . S ome b locks h ave l arge u nits a t o ne o r b oth e nds with a v arying n umber o f i ndividual u nits b etween ; t he s outh-eastern b lock a t H igh R ochester ( fig 4 4 .1A) s eems t o h ave h ad v ery l ong u nits. B uilding V II a t C aernarvon ( fig 4 4 .2) i s u nique i n h aving c halet u nits t o t he n orth-west s eparated b y a n arrow g ap f rom t wo o r m ore l ong t hin r ooms t o t he s outh-east. T he n orth-east wall o f t he b uilding c onnects
t he t wo d ifferent
t ypes
o f
o ther buildings a t C aernarvon c haracteristics ( Daniels 1 980A , 1 81) .
r ooms .
D aniels
n oted
may n ot b e s o a s e arlier b arracks s ometime h ad t he q uarters s eparated f rom t he c ontubernia b y a n a lleyway .
8 0
t hat
m any
h ave c ertain c halet block I n s ome c ases, h owever , t his c enturions'
A ll t he c halet b locks c onform t o t he r egular p lanning o f
t he f orts
i n
which t hey l ie ( though s ome a t H igh R ochester l ay o ver t he r ampart b ank) and p robably - i n many c ases c ertainly - e ach c halet b lock o verlies a n e arlier b arrack-block . S ometimes t hey make u se o f a p ree xisting b arrack-block wall, a s i n b uilding X III a t H ousesteads. W here k nown i n d etail , m any c halet u nits a re u ndivided , b ut a t l east o ne a t Wallsend i s d ivided i nto t hree , w hilst m ore a re d ivided i nto t wo r ooms. Units 3 , 4a nd 5 i n b uilding X IV a t H ousesteads a re u nusual i n t hat t he n orthern p art o f t heir e ast walls a re s et f urther t o t he west, t hus a llowing a wider a lleyway , p resumably t o g ive a ccess t o a d oor half way d own t he e ast s ide o f e ach c halet. T his m odification
d ates
t o
l ater
i n
t he
f ourth
c entury
a nd
o riginally
t he
p lan o f t hese u nits c onformed t o t hat o f t he o thers i n b uilding X IV . A s well a s t he c ertain o ccurrence o f c halets a t C aernarvon, G reat C hesters, H igh R ochester, H ousesteads a nd Wallsend, t here were p robably o thers. A t B irdoswald i n t he s outh-eastern a rea o f t he f ort , t he b uildings o f t he C onstantian p eriod were d escribed a s " short b arracks, d ivided b y d rainage a lleys, c losely r esembling t hose o f 1 929" ( Simpson F . a nd R ichmond 1 932, 1 41) . H orsley r ecorded t hat h e f ound " the d istance a nd b readth o f t he passage b etween t he r ows o f h ouses o r b arracks t o b e n o more t han 3 2 i nches" ( Horsley 1 732, 1 52). A t C hesters t he s outhern-most o f t he f our b arracks e xcavated i n t he e astern p raetentura ( fig 4 2.3) s hows a n umber o f d ouble walls; p ossibly a t s ome p eriod i t was a c halet b lock ( Blair 1 895 p lan b etween 8 8-9). E xcavations a t E bchester i n 1 972 r evealed two u nits with a n arrow a lleyway b etween ( fig 4 4 .4); t hese h ave g enerally b een a ccepted a s e vidence f or c halets h ere ( Maxfield a nd R eed 1 975) . A n a erial p hotograph o f R isingham s hows a s pread o f small b uildings a cross t he f ort's i nterior which D aniels s uggests c ould b e c halets ( St. J oseph 1 969, p l. I II n o. I ). A t Malton, C order f ound what were a lmost
c ertainly
c halets:
" The
i nternal b uildings
were
o f
s tone;
i n
t he n orth c orner the o nly i nternal a rea e xcavated - t here were r ectangular h utments with n arrow s paces b etween ...." ( Corder 1 932, 5 7). He d ated t hese t o t he e arly f ourth c entury . T he c halets a t H ousesteads a nd W allsend were p robably r oofed w ith w ooden s hingles, t hose
a t Malton b eing r oofed with s tone s labs
n ailed
i n p osition
( Pearson 1 936, 8 7). A t C hesterholm, I lkley, Maryport, R avenglass, m ilecastle 4 8 a nd p ossibly a t R eculver , b arracks a nd/or s tables o f t hird-century d ate o r e arlier r emained i n u se i nto t he f irst h alf o f t he f ourth c entury. A t E bchester, i f t he c halets d o d ate t o t he l atter p art o f t he t hird c entury a nd n ot t o t he t ime o f C onstantius ,
t hey r emained i n u se .
t he e astern u nit t here was e vidence f or i ts h aving b een m odified a s n ew f lagged f loor w as p rovided w hich o verlay t he p hase I h earths .
I n a A
s ingle o val h earth i n t he n orth-west c orner o f t he c halet b elonged t o t his phase b ut, u nlike i ts p redecessors, i t was n ot a ssociated with metal-working ( Maxfield a nd R eed 1 975, 6 4). T he e xtension t o t he b arrack-block f ound i n 1 958-9 ( probably o f S everan d ate) r eceived a c obble f loor, s ealing e arth a nd r ubble; a c ircular h earth s tood o n t his f loor. T he e xcavator d ated t he f loor t o t he C onstantian r econstruction ( Jarrett 1 960A, 2 18). E xcavations b y S teer i n t he n orth-west a ngle i n 1 936 r evealed a p ossible b arrack-block a bout 3 8 .12m l ong a nd a veraging 1 0 .93m w ide ( fig 4 7 .2) w hich was v ery p oorly c onstructed o f l arge, r oughly-dressed s tone a nd r e-used s tone i rregularly l aid, b adly c oursed a nd r arely s howing a s traight f ace.
8 1
A s tone p artition a cross t he n orthern e nd o f t he b uilding f ormed a r oom 5 .49m x 1 0.1m . A d rain c ontaining much t hird-century p ottery h ad b een f illed w ith c lay a nd b roken f lags when t he b arrack w as b uilt . S ealed u nder a r ough f loor, p robably c ontemporary with t he b arrack w alls, was a n u nusual f langed b owl o f t hird-century a ffinities ( ibid 2 07-8) . T he b uildings w ithin m ilecastle 4 8 r etained t he s ame p lan a s t hey h ad had i n p eriod I I, t hough t he r ooms were r efloored ( except p erhaps f or r oom 3 i n C hlorus
t he western b lock).
A c oin
o f C onstantius
w as p ossibly s ealed b y a p eriod I II f loor .
A t B irdoswald t he b uilding n orth o f t he v ia p rincipalis was o f u nusual p lan i n i ts e arly f ourth-century p hase ( fig 5 0 .110 . T he c onstruction o f
t he b uilding was p oor;
i t h ad e arthen a nd f lagged f loors
r oofs t iled with s andstone .
R oom I IIg was h ypocausted;
a nd
I IIb w as
i nterpreted a s a wash-house with a s ump which was a lso s erved b y a n o vershoot f rom I IIc. I IIa with a l arge h earth a nd a f lagged f loor was i nterpreted a s a c ookhouse . T he p urpose o f t he whole b uilding i s f ar f rom c lear; t he e xcavators s uggested t hat i t f ormed o fficers' q uarters ( Richmond a nd B irley e arlier f ourth-century c oins;
E . 1 930). I t was a ssociated with t he l atest c oin f rom t he p receding
l evel was o f E lagabalus . B ehind t he n orth r ampart a t H igh R ochester , R ichmond n oted a c omplete r ebuilding o f t he S everan b arrack-block o n d ifferent l ines . A s o nly t he a ngle o f a b uilding was f ound , within which was a f lagged f loor, i t i s n ot c lear w hether t his w as p art o f a c halet b lock ( Richmond 1 936 , 1 81) . I n t he e xcavations o f 1 961-2, a t P apcastle, a n ormal s tyle b arrackb lock may h ave b een f ound , t hough t he p lan r ecovered was f ragmentary ( fig 4 7 .3 , C harlesworth 1 965) . A t B ainbridge , b uildings w ere f ound b y D roop a nd J ones o n t he s outh s ide o f t he v ia p raetoria i nside t he e ast g ate;
t hey d ated t he f inal p eriod ,
p eriod 3 ,
t o t he e arly f ourth
c entury ( Droop a nd J ones 1 932). T o t he s outh was f ound a nother with walls 6 1cm w ide o f v ery p oor c onstruction w hich , t ogether w ith s ome p aving, o verlay r ubble a s t he p eriod 3 walls had t o t he n orth. I n t his r ubble was a c oin o f C laudius I I ( Wade 1 955, 1 38). H artley f ound s everal p eriods o f b uildings i n t he s ame a rea b ut o f t he p resumed C onstantian p hase , l ittle w as r evealed ( Hartley 1 960 f ig 5 D). I n t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury, t he b uildings i n t he p raetentura a t B rough-on-Noe were r ebuilt i n s tone . I n t he a ngle b etween t he v ia p rincipalis a nd t he i ntervallum r oad, a p eriod I I t imber b uilding h ad b een d emolished a nd t he a rea l evelled b efore t he b uilding o f t he s tone s tructure. T his h ad b een much d isturbed a nd o nly a s ingle wall a nd a s tone b ase r emained l ying amongst r ubble m ainly o f b roken r oof s lates . T his b uilding w ould s eem t o h ave b een o n t he s ame a lignment a s t hat o f p eriod I I ( Jones G . T hompson a nd W ild 1 966 , 1 01) . I n 1 967 m ore o f t his b uilding was e xcavated a nd i t was p resumed t o b e ab arrack-block ( no .1) 8 .54m wide by a bout 3 9.04m l ong,
f lanked t o t he e ast b y a 2 .74m p aved a lley ( fig 4 8 .2) .
e ast,
t renching
i ndicated
t hat
t here
w ere
t wo
f urther
b arracks
T o t he a bout
8 .54m w ide s eparated b y a lleys a f ew f eet w ide , a nd a n e quivalent p air o f b uildings s eem t o h ave b een f ound b y R ichmond t o t he e ast o f t he v ia p raetoria ( Jones G . 1 967) . I n 1 968 , f urther w ork was c arried o ut o n t he n orth-east e nd o f b arrack-block 1 . ( if
i t
b e
t he same one) w as
i ntervallum .
1 .C6m w ider ,
A t t his e nd t he b uilding
e xtending o ver
t he p eriod I I
Ap artition o n t he l ong a xis o f t he b uilding a t t his
8 2
e nd
d ivided
i t
i nto
t wo
l ong
r ooms
a bout
3 .81m a cross .
T he western
r oom was t hought t o h ave b een a s table a s i ts f loor was o f f lat c obbles w ith g ravel a nd t here w as a m ucking-out d rain p arallel t o t he n orth-west wall a nd s ome h orse t eeth . A s ubstantial h earth i n t he e astern r oom, i t was s uggested, may i dentify t his r oom a s a smithy, b ut t he p resence o f a p artition c ould i ndicate t hat i t was u sed a s l iving a ccommodation . F ound l odged i n o ne p artition wall was s lightly-worn c oin o f C arausius A D 2 88 ( Jones G . a nd W ild 1 969A ) .
a
A t Y ork i n t he p raetentura W enham t hought h e h ad f ound t he c enturions' e nds o f f our b arracks s et p erpendicular t o t he v ia s agularis b y i nterval-tower S W3 ( fig 4 8 .1) . B uilding o f which o nly t he s outh a ngle was f ound, may h ave b een a l ater f ourth-century r ebuilding a s t he excavator n oted t hat t he c orner was o f p oorer workmanship t han C onstantian work e lsewhere i n t he f ortress . T here was a d rain within t he building; a n a blutions r oom i n t he c enturions' q uarters was s uggested; painted wall p laster was a lso f ound . o ther b uildings were f ound ( denham 1 959-62);
F ew t race , o f t he t here i s l ittle
e vidence t hat Wenham's b uildings ' S', ' P', ' Q' a nd ' R' were b arrackb locks . B ordering t he i ntervallum r oad b y S W5, a b uilding was f ound p robably l ying p arallel t o t he f ortress wall which c annot r epresent a b arrack-block s et p arallel t o t he v ia p raetoria ( Sumpter a nd C oll 1 977, 9 0). A t P ortchester, f ourth
b uildings R 1 a nd R 2 c ontinued i n u se well i nto t he
c entury .
I n t he n orth-west,
p raetentura
a t
Wallsend,
n o
c halet b locks h ave b een f ound b ut a n umber o f i rregular s eperate s tructures s urvived , s ome o f s tone a nd o thers o f t imber w ith f loors o f p acked r ubble ( fig 5 1 .1 M . T hese o verlay b oth t he d emolished r emains o f t he t hird-century b uildings a nd t he r oads e xact
d ate o f
t hese s tructures
( Daniels
1 977).
i s n ot a t p resent k nown .
T he
T he f ort a t
D oncaster i n t he e arly f ourth c entury was p rovided w ith F - ,m e t imber b uildings a nd h ad i ts r oads r emetalled ( Dolby 1 972) .
3 izeable A m ore
s ubstantial b uilding with p itched f ootings was f ound i n t he s outh-west q uarter o f t he f ort ( Dolby a nd B uckland 1 971). A t S tanwix, t wo b uildings 7 .62m a nd 6 .71m w ide , w ere f ound t o t he s outh o f t he f ort's n orth wall . T he n orthern o ne was s eparated f rom t he wall b y a bout 3 .57m and must h ave o verlain t he i ntervallum r oad a nd p ossibly o verlay a nd impinged o n t he r ampart. T hese b uildings r ested o n a l ayer o f g ravel which i tself o verlay s ome s econd-century p ottery. T hey were a ssociated w ith p ottery t raditionally d ated t o W all p eriod I II ( Simpson F . a nd H ogg 1 935). A lthough t hey were t hought, when e xcavated, t o l ie o utide t he f ort, f urther work which l ocated t he s outh-west F .
a nd
a ngle ,
R ichmond
p roved
t hat
t hey h ad
l ain within
t he
f ort
( Simpson
1 941) .
A b uilding was p laced o ver t he r ampart a t Whitley C astle i n Wall p eriod I II which l ay 3 .05m f rom t he i nner f ace o f t he f ort wall . I t w as p robably a t t his t ime t hat t he r ampart was t otally r emoved i n t his a rea - c ertainly w hen t he f ort wall c ollapsed i nwards, a t
t he
l evel
o f
t he
e arly
f ourth-century
r ampart
i ts
s tones
l ay
b uildings' f ootings
( Shaw 1 959, f ig 2 ). I n R isingham f ort ,
t he
r ampart b acking o n t he west w all was c ut b ack
t o within 3 .05m o f t he f ort wall a nd r evetted with s tone . O n t his l evelled a rea a m illstone was f ound , b ut t here was n o e vidence f or a b uilding ( Richmond 1 936, 1 95). B ehind t he n orth wall a t I lkley t o
8 3
t he e ast o f
t he g ate ,
a s tone b uilding was p laced o ver t he i ntervallum
r oad a nd d enuded r ampart which t he e xcavator s uggested was p robably o ne o f a s eries o f s imilar s tructures i n t he p raetentura ( Hartley 1 966 ,
3 8-9) .
I n t he r etentura t he S everan s tone walls
s everal c ourses h igh were i gnored a nd r eplaced b y h ole c onstruction, p robably a ligned e ast-west e arlier v ia q uintana .
T his b uilding s eems
s till s tanding
a b uilding o f p osta nd overlying t he
t o h ave b een a f abrica;
p it within i t c ontained a l ittle f ourth-century p ottery, c rucibles, s cale a rmour, e tc . ( ibid 4 0) . O ver t he v ia q uintana were
f ound
within
a t
B irdoswald ,
which
was
t races
a v ery
1 931,
1 28) .
e lliptical
f ourth
c entury
b uilding
i n
t he
( pers.
b egun a t a much e arlier d ate , t he
l ate
3 9) . t he
Mr .
p raetorii
a t
b ut o nly s eems a nd N ewstead
Daniels) .
C hester
T he
may have
b een
t o h ave b een c ompleted i n
c entury
1 967,
e vidence was f ound f or a p eriod o f
l aying o f
( Droop
f loor
( Richmond
f urther a ltered i n
C .M.
t hird
I n
( Eames
c omm .
l atera
f lagged
a n a ssociated wall
T he p ossible h ospital a t Wallsend was
e arly
a
s lag ,
a C onstantian b uilding
s ubstantial
i ncorporating a small d omestic a ltar a nd t he
o f
b ronze
1 939,
N ash-Williams
1 969 ,
d ereliction b etween
t he f oundations a nd t he b uilding's s ubsequent c ompletion
1 968).
I t
c onsisted
o f
a n
e lliptical
wall
set
within
a
r ectangular e nclosure
( fig 5 2.2), a t t he c entre o f which was a n oval
c ourtyard
heavy
p aved
with
s andstone
f lags
and
s urrounded
c olonnaded ambulatory . A r esidential f unction f or t he b een s uggested ( Thompson F . 1 965, 4 0). T races o f p ossibly o f
t his
d ate ,
l ayer a nd n umerous b urnt
c overed immediately b y a c harcoal
t iles were n oted .
p laced i n h ollows 8 cm a nd 1 5cm d eep, o f
C onstantian
a
were f ound within t he d efences a t L eintwardine;
t hree s ettings o f l arge s tone f lags,
t he p illars
b y
b uilding h as a b uilding,
a v eranda
( Stanford
r econstruction
1 968 ,
work
T he t wo e asterly s ettings,
were e xplained a s f oundations
has
f or
2 71) . been
n oted
i n
t he
m ilitary
c ompounds a t C orbridge, a t which t ime t he e xcavators d ated t he u niting o f t he e ast a nd west c ompounds . I n t he n ew wall a long t he m ain e astwest s treet, p rotected b y p rojection,
a g ate ( fig 2 0 .5) was placed, i ts west s ide b eing a s emi-circular p rojecting t ower, b acked b y a l ong p erhaps
s tairs.
O n
r ectangular p rojecting t ower . small
b locks
with a c ore
o f
a nd B irley E . 1 938, 2 49).
t he
e ast
s ide
was
a s hallow
T he n ew wall and g ate were b uilt o f
c lean ,
b roken s tone a nd c ement
( Richmond
Additions were made t o t he west c ompound
p rincipia; a r ange o f r ooms was a dded o n t he n orth s ide o f b uilding which, i t was s uggested, may have b een built f or a dministrators
t o l ive i n .
A p ortico was
c arried a cross
t he t he
t he f ront o f
t he widened b uilding a nd an a pse was added t o t he r ear o f t he a edes. T here a nd
were
a lso
a lterations
I V were widened a nd
r oom h ad a s tokehole
f or
i n
t he
workshops
s ubdivided a new . a h ypocaust
when
I n s hop
t he
b uildings
I V ,
t he n ew n orth
( Richmond a nd B irley E .
I II
1 940) .
A s c an b e s een f rom t he a bove i nformation, much work h as b een a ttributed t o t he t ime o f C onstantius C hlorus - m uch o f i t i s q uite l ikely t o h ave b een d ated c orrectly .
I t
a m ajor r ebuilding p rogramme w ould h ave
i s p lausible t o s uggest t aken p lace a t
t hat
t his t ime when
t he B ritish p rovinces were r eunited with t he Empire .
S ome o f t he
work n oted a bove, h owever, c ould d ate t o a l ittle b efore o r a fter A D 2 96-306; i t i s n ot e asy t o e nvisage what a n e xcavator means b y d ating a p hase t o t he l ate t hird c entury o r t o t he e arly f ourth. c ase
h e
may
b e
a ssociating
i t
with C onstantius
8 4
o r
I n e ach
s eeking not
t o
a ssociate
i t
with h im .
between t he l ate a rchaeologically.
I t
t hird
i s v ery d ifficult century
and
t o m ake a ny d istinction
the
early
f ourth
c entury
A lthough t here c learly was a r eoccupation i n s trength o f many f orts a t t his t ime ,
t he g arrison o f t he n orth a nd west was n ot a s
l arge a s
which had held t he s ame a rea i n t he e arlier t hird c entury.
t hat
T he I I
l egion had moved f rom C aerleon; i t i s p ossible t hat p art. o f i t g arrisoned t he n earby f ort a t Cardiff, a lthough much o f i t n o d oubt l eft
Wales.
R ichborough
P art u nder
o f
t he
l egion
C arausius
where
may
i t
have
i s
t aken
r ecorded
a rchaeologicaly i ts p resence i s n ot a ttested . i f i t
was s till t here, i mply t hat
T he
u p
g arrison
t he N otitia ,
l egion a t
a t b ut
C hester,
must have been g reatly r educed i n s trength,
t hough t he s uggested maintenance o f p erhaps
i n
l arge t roop
t he 2 4 h a d efended e nclosure would
c oncentrations m ay h ave b een
e nvisaged
i n t he a rea , p erhaps o n a t emporary b asis ( cf . S trickland 1 981B, 4 323 ) . Again a t Y ork i t i s p ossible t hat s ome a reas o f t he f ortress l ay u noccupied . Miller n oted t he a bsence o f f ourth-century barrackb locks i n t he areas e xamined u p t o his t ime a nd t he l ack o f f ourthc entury
p ottery
( Miller
1 927) .
H e
c oncluded
t hat:
" The f ortress a t t hat t ime had a n a reas o f 5 0 a cres; o f t he
implying d efence, a t
i ts
t hat
t hat
t here
was
a body
would s eem t o mean t hat
h eadquarters
i f
l arge
t he r ebuilding
f ortress o n t hat s cale i n t he u nsettled c onditions o f
a t
p art
o f
t he
I h ave
i nterior
t roops
l ike
i ts
d escribed
a reas,
o ld s trength . i s
f ound
i ts
t he p robable
I t
f ollows
i nference will n ot b e b ut
t hat t he
t roops f or which t he r estored f ortress was d esigned,
n ot l ive withln i ts walls T he
f or
t o h old g ood f or a
t hat Y ork i n t he f ourth c entury was h eld b y a d etachment, l arge b ody o f
t he t ime ,
adequate
t he Y ork l egion was s till maintained
s omething
s uch e vidence a s
o f
f ortress
o f
Y ork
i n p ermanent q uarters"
will,
f or
much o f
( Miller
i ts history,
1 928,
9 8) .
have b een o f
g reater importance t han t hose o f t he o ther B ritish l egions. t he e arly t hird c entury,
d id
S ince
i t h ad p robably b een t he c apital o f B ritannia
I nferior a nd i n t he f ourth c entury i t will h ave r etained i ts s tatus a s c apital o f B ritannia S ecunda a nd was, n o d oubt, t he headquarters o f t he
dux B ritanniarum .
e laborate s outh-west
I t
p restige r ather t han f or p resence
o f
t he
has
d efences
been o f
d efence .
s uggested
t he f ortress S ome h ave
t hat
t he
c onnected
emperor C onstantius C hlorus a t Y ork,
p erhaps b e a ssociated with t he d ux . i mperial c apital f or
l ess
u nusually
were p rimarily f or t his b ut
with
t he
i t c ould
York will o nly have b een a n
t han o ne y ear ,
t hough o riginally i t m ay h ave
b een i ntended t o s erve a s s uch f or l onger. I n auxiliary f orts t here i s a lso p reviously t here h ad b een b arracks . w here
a ll
t he b arracks
were
e vidence f or o pen a reas where C aersws i s t he m ost e xtreme c ase
d emolished,
a s
was
t he p raetorium e xcept
f or t he h eated s uite t hat had been a dded i n t he t hird c entury. T he p resence o f l ate t hird a nd f ourth-century p ottery i ndicates t hat t he s ite
was
s till
o ccupied,
t hough b y whom
i s
n ot k nown
( Daniels,
J ones
G . and P utnam 1 967). A t L ancaster, t he r etentura d id n ot c ontain b uildings i n t he f ourth c entury ( Jones G . 1 970). T he n orth-west p raetentura
a t
Wallsend
r emained
u noccupied
b y
b uildings
u ntil
c irca
A D 3 67 ( Daniels 1 976) . T he b arracks i n t he r etentura a t I lkley were o verlain i n t he f ort's p eriod 4 , b y a t imber f abrica, d ated t o C onstantius
b y
t he e xcavator
( Hartley
8 5
1 966 ,
4 0) .
A n umber o f f orts o n H adrian's Wall which h ad p ossibly b een t otally a bandoned i n t he l ater t hird c entury, d o n ot s eem t o h ave b een r eoccupied
i n
t he
e arly
f ourth
c entury,
nor
d o
t he
f orts
o f
P iercebridge a nd C aernarvon . A t H altonchesters, n o buildings were f ound t hat c ould b e d ated b etween t he l ater t hird a nd t he l ater f ourth c entury ( Gillam 1 962), a nd G illam b elieves t hat t he whole f ort was p robably u noccupied f or a p eriod o f a bout 1 00 y ears.
One p ossible
p roblem with t his i nterpretation r esults f rom J arrett's e xcavation i n 1 957 when h e f ound two r ampart b uildings which were d ated f rom t he p ottery t o a fter c irca A D 2 80 . H ence h e d ated t hem t o C onstantius C hlorus; c entury .
t his p ottery w ould n ow b e d ated m uch e arlier i n t he t hird B etween t wo c lay f loors i n o ne o f t hese b uildings d escribed
a s
t he
" above
c lay
f loor
o f
2 96
a nd b elow
a l ater
r elaying
o f
i t
a ssignable t o s ome d ate b efore 3 67" , were f ive c oins, t he l atest b eing o ne o f A llectus ( Jarrett 1 960B, 1 55). I t i s d ifficult t o s uggest a d ate f or t he s econd o f t hese f loors b ut i t m ust p ost-date A D 2 93-6 a nd i t i s v ery u nlikely t hat a c oin o f A llectus would b e a round c irca A D 3 70 o r t hat t he b uilding w ould h ave b een r e-usable a fter t he i nferred a bandonment o f c irca 1 00 y ears . A t Rudchester,
i n t he small a rea i nvestigated i n 1 972, t he e vidence
f or a bandonment was v ery s imilar t o t hat a t H altonchesters ( Gillam , H arrison a nd N ewman 1 973) . T he u nstratified c oin o f Maximianus i n g ood c ondition f rom t he f ort ( Brewis 1 924, 1 10 n o .12) need n ot imply i ts o ccupation a t t hat d ate . I f o ne a ccepts t hat, i n t he a bsence o f military s tructures a t S outh S hields t he s ite was u noccupied by t he military,
t he p ottery, c oins a nd s tructures must i ndicate c ivilian
o ccupation o n t he f ort s ite . I t i s n ot p ossible t o s uggest a d ate when t he f ort was r eoccupied b y t he military a s n o s pecifically military s tructures a re known a fter c irca A D 2 20 . A t s ome t ime i n t he f ourth c entury, t he n umerus b arcariorum T igrisiensium s tationed h ere , b ut p recisely when a nd f or h ow l ong i s u nclear .
was
A t C hesterholm t he e vidence f or t he a bandonment o f t he v icus b etween a bout A D 2 70 a nd A D 3 70 i s g radually a ccumulating . A s t he h istory o f v ici o ften r eflects t hat o f t he f orts b y w hich t hey l ie , i t w ould n ot b e u nreasonable t o s uggest t hat t he f orts a t C hesterholm a nd O ld P enrith m ay a lso h ave b een a bandoned a t t his p eriod b y t he m ilitary . T he p resence o f a h oard o f a bout 3 00 c oins, t he l atest o f M agnentius, f ound i n t he g uardchamber o f t he w est g ate a t C hesterholm ( Birley E . 1 931, 1 85) s uggests t hat t he s tructure was i n d isuse when t he hoard was d eposited . With t he r eoccupation o f t he f ort i n s tone wall p eriod I II c onventionally d ated t o C ount T heodosius' r econstruction, t he r oof o f t he p rincipia had e ither b ecome u nsafe o r had c ollapsed a nd r equired r ebuilding . I n t he west r oom o f t he p rincipia 's s outh r ange, t he h ypocaust p ilae p ut i nto t he r oom i n t he f ort's l ast p eriod were c onstructed o f r e-used r oof t iles . I n t he t hird c entury n orth g ate, b etween t he p eriod I a nd I I r oadways, was a l ayer o f r ubbish 3 0cm t hick . D uring t he ' Theodosian r econstruction ' e xtensive r epairs were r equired o n t he f ort's d efences . T hat t he f ort was o ccupied b y s omeone i n t he e arlier f ourth c entury i s c lear f rom t he c oins f ound i n e xcavations i n t he n orth-east a ngle o f t he f ort i n 1 980 ( pers . c omm . Mr. P . B idwell), b ut whether b y t roops o r c ivilians i s n ot k nown . T he n umerous m odifications i n t he b arrack-blocks e xcavated i n t his a rea which o n e ach o ccasion a ffected more t han o ne ' contubernium', s uggested t o t he e xcavator t hat t he s ite was u nder m ilitary c ontrol f rom t he m id-third c entury u ntil w ell i nto t he f ourth c entury .
8b
I n t he e arly f ourth c entury t here i s s ome e vidence t hat H adrian 's W all i tself l ay i n r uin . B y m ilecastle 3 5 t he Wall was i n d isrepair f rom t he t hird c entury i nto t he l ate f ourth a nd a t s ome t ime - p ossibly i n t he e arly f ourth c entury - t he W all , where i t m et t he n orth-west a ngle o f B irdoswald f ort, w as d emolished a nd a s mall d itch c arried r ound t he a ngle 8 .54m t o t he west o f i t . I t was e vident t o t he e xcavators t hat Hadrian's W all h ad b een r oughly r ebuilt a t t his p oint, a nd w here i t c rossed t he d itch a c onduit h ad b een i nserted t o t ake away f lood w ater f rom i t. T his r ebuild i ncorporated r e-used masonry which s ealed s everal p ieces o f e arly f ourth-century
c ooking p ots
a t
t he
b ottom o f t he d itch ( Simpson F . a nd R ichmond 1 934). Mr. J .P . Gillam n oticed t hat when t he Wall west o f B irdoswald was b eing d ismantled p rior t o c onsolidation b y t he M inistry o f W orks a round 1 950 , p ottery d ating t o c irca A D 3 00 was f ound within i ts s tructure ( Gillam 1 974, 1 4 ) . I t i s p ossible t hat f or a t ime t he f ort a t B irdoswald s tood i n i solation f rom t he W all . V ery f ew t urrets r emained i n u se i nto t he f ourth c entury t urrets 7 b, 4 4b a nd 4 8a a nd b c ertainly r emained i n military t his t ime ( Charlesworth 1 977 ) . O f t he m ilecastles, o nly a t 3 5 1 979), 4 0 ( Simpson F . 1 976), 4 8 ( Gibson a nd S impson F . 1 911),
- o nly u se a t ( Savage 5 1 a nd
5 2 ( Simpson F . a nd R ichmond 1 935) a nd p ossibly 5 0 ( Simpson F . 1 913), i s t here s tructural e vidence f or e arly f ourth-century o ccupation . T he o ccupation o f m ilecastle 3 5 may h ave b een c ivilian ( pers. c omm . Mr . M . S avage). F rom milecastles 9 ( Birley E . 1 930), 1 3 ( Simpson F . 1 931),
3 2
( Binns
1 971),
3 7
1 952) p ottery a nd/or c oins
( Blair 1 934) a nd 7 9 ( Richmond a nd G illam
o f
t his
p eriod h ave b een f ound .
S ince Wilkes' e xcavations i n 1 960 o f b uilding X IV a t H ousesteads, i t h as been s uggested t hat t he c halet b locks f ormed married q uarters. T he m ain e vidence f or t his h as b een t he n umber o f t rinkets a ssociated w ith t hese b uildings w hich were t hought m ore l ikely t o h ave b een w orn b y w omen t han b y t he s oldiers c hildren w ithin f orts
t hemselves .
T he p resence o f w omen a nd
i n t he s econd c entury h as
o ften b een
c ommented
o n a nd t he f ind o f s hoes f rom t he r efuse h oles a nd d itches a t B ar H ill i s a well-known e xample ( Macdonald a nd P ark 1 906, 1 01 f f). I t h as b een u sual t o e xplain t hese a way a s h aving b elonged t o t he f amily o f t he c ommanding o fficer ,
t hough
P rofessor E . B irley h as s uggested t hat
c enturions were a lso a llowed t o h ave t heir f amilies w ithin t he w alls ( Birley R . 1 977B, 1 76). A n i nscription f rom Westerwood o n t he A ntonine W all s hows t hat a c enturion o f t he V I V ictrix h ad b rought h is w ife a nd f amily w ith h im f rom Y ork
( Breeze a nd D obson 1 976 ,
2 04) .
I n t he p re-Hadrianic f orts a t C hesterholm , a t annery was f ound a nd o n i ts f loor was m uch r ubbish , i ncluding o ver 2 00 i tems o f f ootwear, 7 0% o f which was t oo small t o have b een worn b y a nyone b ut women a nd c hildren .
T he
e xcavators
n oted
t hat
t hey
c annot
a ll h ave
b een u sed
b y t he o ccupants o f t he p raetorium a nd s uggested t hat o n s ome f rontiers, R oman a rmy r egulations were n ot a lways s trictly a dhered t o . F inds o f o ther ' civilian' o bjects within f orts a re c ommon ( Birley R . 1 977B,
1 24-5).
I n t he e arly f ourth c entury t here i s i ncontestable e vidence t hat w omen were present i n a t l east t hree f orts, t wo o f which l ie o n t he S axon S hore . T he p resence o f i nfant b urials o n R oman o ccupation s ites i s a r elatively c ommon o ccurrence . U nder R oman l aw , b urials n ormally h ad t o b e placed o utside t he l im ts o f a s ettlement, b ut in t he c ase o f
8 7
i nfants, b urial w ithin a s ettlement w as a llowed . i nfant b urials h ave b een f ound w ithin t he a rea o f r elevant
e xcavations
h ave
y et
t o
b e p ublished ,
A t R eculver, f ive t he f ort b ut a s t he i s
n ot p ossible t o
b e s ure w hether t hese a re c ontemporary w ith t he f ort p re-date i t . T here w as e arlier c ivilian o ccupation
i t
o r w hether t hey i n t he a rea a nd
t he t hree i nfant b urials d escribed a s l ying b eneath t he f oundations o f t he t hird-century b ake-house ( Philp 1 967 ) c ould b elong t o a p re-fort p hase . T he i nfant b urials f ound i n t he t wo b uildings d escribed a s l iving
q uarters
b y
t he e xcavator
( possibly b ecause
t hey h ad c ontained
t he b urials) a re p robably c ontemporary w ith t hese b uildings a nd w ould t herefore d ate t o c irca A D 2 70-300 ( Philp 1 962) . At P ortchester , 2 7 i nfant b urials were f ound w hilst o nly o ne p ossible a dult b urial w as n oted which c ould h ave b een o f S axon d ate . Most o f t he i nfants h ad d ied s oon a fter b irth ( Hooper 1 975). T hese b urials o ccurred mainly b etween A D 3 25 a nd 3 45 b ut t hey were p resent f rom AD 3 00 onwards. T he e xcavator s uggested t hree p ossible t ypes o f o ccupation within t he f ort: 1 .
O ccupied
t hroughout
b y
t he
m ilitary w ho
g radually
a llowed
w ives
a nd c hildren t o m ove i nto t he d efended a rea. 2 .
3 .
C ivilian o ccupation r esidence.
i n
t he
i ntervals
b etween
t he
military
O ccupation b y a b asically c ivilian c ommunity among whom w ere b ased a s mall m ilitia.
C unliffe s eems t o f avour t he t hird i nterpretation a nd h e s uggests t hat t he s ite m ay h ave b een d emilitarised a bout A D 2 96 o n t he r econquest o f B ritain b y C onstantius C hlorus. S ome e vidence f or d emolition o f i nternal b uildings was f ound ( Cunliffe 1 973, 3 6) but the s uggestion t hat
c entral g overnment
a nd h ence u nlikely. d emolished
a ppreciated t he d anger o f
t he d emolition o f t he i nternal I t would b e t he d efences t hat t o r emove t he t hreat o f t he f ort's
s uch
c oastal f ort
b uildings, i s s urely would have had t o b e b eing h eld a gainst t he
C entral Empire a gain . P ortchester s eems t o h ave p layed n o p art whatever i n t he e vents o f A D 2 96 . F rom within t he f ort t here w as much e vidence f or t he p resence o f women a s t here was a n e xtensive c ollection o f s pinning a nd weaving e quipment p lus i tems o f p ersonal j ewellery a nd women 's
s hoes
( Cunliffe
1 975 ,
4 27 ) .
W ithin t he f ort a t M alton , 2 9 i nfant b urials were f ound u p t o t he t ime w hen t he r eport was w ritten a nd o thers w ere p resumably f ound l ater o n a n u npublished p lan o f t he e xcavations i n t he n orthern p art o f t he f ort,
i nfant b urial n umber 3 1 i s r ecorded.
b urials
p re-date
t he
e arly
A t l east t wo o f t hese
f ourth-century
buildings.
O n
a n
u npublished s ection, i nfant b urial n umber 2 9 i s s hown d ug f rom a p eriod 2 l evel d ated c irca A D 2 60-80 . B urial n umber 3 1 i s p artly s ealed b y ap eriod 3 wall d ated t o a bout A D 3 04-69 a nd i t i s perhaps p ossible t hat b oth t hese b urials
d ate
t o t he
l ater t hird c entury w hen
t he f ort may h ave b een u noccupied b y t he military.
I nfant burials
a re v ery c ommon i n t he c ivilian s ettlement b y t his f ort. U p u ntil 1 964, 2 2 s uch b urials h ad c ome f rom t he v icus r anging i n d ate f rom t he s econd t o t he f ourth c entury ( 4itchelson 1 964, 2 29). A t C hesters, t he m ost e asterly i nterval-tower o n t he s outh wall y ielded s keletons o f t wo n ewly-born b abies ( Birley E . 1 959 , 1 7) . N o d ating e vidence i s r ecorded
b ut
t hey
c ould w ell b e R oman a nd p ossibly
8 8
c ontemporary w ith
t hose n oted a bove . I t i s n ot c lear w hether t he i nfant b urials f ound w ithin t he f ort a t L ittlechester r epresent c ivilian o ccupation w ithin a s till o ccupied m ilitary e stablishment ( Wheeler H . 1 981) . A t M alton a nd p ossibly a t C hesters,
c halets a re k nown .
Many
o f
t he
b urials a t Malton a re a ssociated with t hese c halets. O ne b uilding w hich C order d escribed a s a h ouse c ontained 1 0 i nfant b urials, s ome o f which were l aid i n l ime a nd most were c overed b y t iles o r r oofing s labs.
C order n oted
t hat
f rom
o ccupation within t he f ort i ntensive ( Corder 1 930 , 7 0) .
t he
t ime
a t
l east
was
o f i n
C onstantius p art
c ivil
C hlorus, a nd v ery
T here i s t hen c lear e vidence f or t he p resence o f c ivilians w ithin a t l east s ome f orts i n t he l ate t hird a nd f irst half o f t he f ourth c entury. A t Malton, t he p resence o f women within t he c halets i s i ndicated a nd, i n t he c ase o f t his f ort a t l east, we s hould h ave t o a ccept
t hat
c halets were b eing u sed a s m arried q uarters i n t he p eriod
c irca A D 3 00 t o 3 67 . I s i t n ot a v alid a ssumption t hat o ther c halets may have b een s o u sed? Were t hey d esigned t o h ouse f amily g roups? Wilkes n oted t hat u nder t he r ations s ystem o perative i n t he f ourth c entury, t he o rdinary s oldier was t reated a s t he h ead o f a h ousehold , t he g overnment n ormally i ssuing f ood s ufficient f or a man a nd h is f amily ( Wilkes 1 966 , 1 31) . f or l iving a ccommodation .
N ot a ll c halet u nits, h owever , w ere u sed O f t he p robable c halets a t E bchester , t he
e astern u nit h ad o riginally b een u sed f or m etalworking a nd t hree s lag h earths were l ocated i n t he n orthern h alf, a ll o f which p roduced e vidence o f b ronze s melting . A t hick l ayer o f c arbon a ssociated w ith t his metalworking a ccumulated o n t he f loor o f t he u nit . T he a bsence o f i nfant b urials f rom o ther f orts i s p uzzling, b ut t he p ractice may have b een l ocalised i n i ts o ccurrence . N o i nfant b urials have b een f ound i n t he vici a t H ousesteads a nd C hesterholm. D aniels s uggests t hat w hen t roops m oved o ut o f m any f orts i n t he n orth i n t he l ater t hird c entury, t he v icani who were l eft m ay h ave m oved i n t o t hese f orts. He envisages t he r eturning s oldiers under C onstantius C hlorus b eing f aced with a f ait a ccompli ( cf MacMullen 1 963, " The a bandoned c amp may b e t aken o ver b y c ivilians, o r a gain c ivilians may move i n o n t op o f t he p roper o ccupants o f t he f ort", MacMullen 1 976, 1 90 : " During t he c risis, t he unarmed p opulation a round a f ort m ight s eek i n i t a m omentary p rotection , e ven p ermanent r esidence" ). D aniels n otes t he s imilarity i n g eneral p lan b etween t he s trip-houses o f t he v ici a nd t he c halets ( Daniels 1 980A , 1 89) b ut t he s imilarity b etween t he g eneral p lan o f c halets a nd c ontubernia m ay, however, b e o f more s ignificance . I f e ach c halet u nit h oused o ne f amily g roup, t hen t he g arrison s ize which c ould have b een a ccommodated
within
f orts
would
h ave b een
c onsiderably
r educed .
D aniels s uggests t he p ossibility o f 1 0 c halet b locks o f e ight u nits e ach a t H ousesteads with a p ossible f ive f urther u nits b eing p rovided b ehind t he r ampart . T his would g ive a g arrison s trength o f a bout 1 5% o f t he s econd-century f ort . A t Wallsend , w ith t he a bsence o f r ampart b uildings, t he g arrison s trength may h ave b een a s l ow a s 8 .5% o f i ts s econd-century
t otal .
T he b uildings
i n t he p raetentura m ay n ot h ave
b een f or a ccommodation a t a ll . T here i s n o more e vidence f or s oldiers l iving o utside f orts i n t he f ourth c entury t han t here h ad b een i n t he t hird . I f t he f ort a t C hesterholm was o ccupied b y t he m ilitary i n t he e arly t o mid-fourth c entury, t hen t he s oldiers' f amilies a t l east must have l ived i n t he f ort a s well a s t he whole
8 9
g arrison . T here was n o e vidence f or a n i nflux o f c ivilians i nto t he b uildings r ecently e xcavated i n t he p raetentura . B oth b uildings r etained b asically t he s ame p lan f rom t he m id-third t o t he m id-fourth c entury . T here was a n a bsence o f i tems t hat would n ormally b e a ssociated w ith
t he p resence o f w omen
( pers .
c omm . Mr .
P . B idwell) .
I t i s n ot c lear f or w hat p urpose t he l arger u nits i n t he c halet b locks were u sed . T he p resence o f t he l arge u nit i n H ousesteads' b uilding X IV o verlying t he c enturion's q uarters might s uggest t hat t hey were s till u sed a s o fficers' a ccommodation .
T he r oom h ere h ad n o a pparent
p artitions a nd t he c orresponding a rea i n b uilding X III c onsisted o f a p orch s eparated b y a v ery n arrow g ap f rom a r oom t o t he w est i n which was f ound a b read o ven . T he p resence o f m ore t han o ne l arge u nit i n s ome c halet b locks makes t heir i dentification a s o fficers' q uarters d ifficult. I f, a s i n t he c ase o f t he e astern u nit i n b ulding X III, t hey w ere n ot u sed f or l iving a reas, t hen t he p ossible g arrison h eld within a f ort would b e g reatly r educed . I f t he r easonably r egular p lan o f c halet b locks was d ictated by t he s ite o f e arlier b uildings a nd r oads, m ay n ot t hese b uildings h ave b een d esigned t o h ave t he s ame f unction a nd h ouse t he s ame t ype o f t roops a nd t heir f amilies, a s were i n t he f orts o n c oasts, h oused i n r ectangular a nd c ircular h uts?
t he s outh and e ast O n a n ew f ort s ite ,
t here would b e n o a dvantage a s f ar a s t he a ctual c oncerned f or p lacing b uildings r egularly . A t s ome o f t he f orts n oted i n t his c hapter ,
c onstruction was
t here w as
n o e vidence f or
c halets o r t imber hutments. C hesterholm, Maryport, Ravenglass a nd I lkley r etained t heir e arlier b uildings, t hough t his c ould h ave b een m ore a m atter o f c onvenience r ather t han r epresenting a d ifferent t ype o f o ccupation within t hese f orte . T he b uildings a t C hesterholm h ave , i n a ny c ase a n umber o f f eatures i n c ommon with c halets: t hey m ay h ave b een u sed t o h ouse s oldiers' f amilies d uring t he t hird c entury . S erviceable b uildings c ould h ave c ontinued i n u se r ather t han b eing r eplaced b y n ew p urpose-built s tructures. E arlier i n t he Roman, p eriod, b arracks c onstructed f or i nfantry o r c avalry were o ften l eft u nchanged when a d ifferent t ype o f u nit m oved i nto t he f ort . None o f t he
f our
f orts
a bove
s hows
e vidence o f a bandonment
i n t he l ate
t hird
c entury . T he e xcavator a t I lkley , a fter c onsidering t he p ossibility o f c ivilians b eing a llowed i nto t he f ort i n t he C onstantian period, r ejected i t a s n o s pecifically c ivilian o bjects were f ound ( Hartley 1 966, 3 9). A t B ainbridge, n ew b uildings were c onstructed i n t he e arly f ourth c entury,
b ut l ittle o f t heir p lan i s k nown ;
t hey
d o n ot
s eem t o h ave b een c halets o r h uts . H itherto,
t he c hange f rom a f ort
t o a f ortified v illage h as g enerally
b een a ssigned t o t he t ime o f C ount T heodosius, y et t he a rchaeological e vidence c learly s hows t hat where t here were major c hanges within f orts, t hey o ccurred i n t he e arly f ourth c entury, a nd l ater work w as o nly a m odification t o t he e xisting a rrangements . T he s uggestion o f Wenham t hat a t Malton a bout A D 3 70: " It i s p ossible t hat t his was t he o ccasion w hen c ivilians w ere a dmitted i nto t he f ort" ( Wenham 1 974 , 3 5), i s t otally a t v ariance with t he e vidence f or i nfant burials, a lmost a ll o f which w ere d ated b y t he e xcavators t o t he p eriod c irca A D
3 05-67
( Corder
1 930 ,
6 7) .
9 0
C HAPTER 6
F ROM C ONSTANTIUS C HLORUS T O C OUNT T HEODOSIUS
T he
i nterpretation o f
t he a rchaeological e vidence f rom m ilitary s ites
i n t he d iocese o f B ritain i n t he f ourth c entury h as b een b ased o n f ive d ated e vents r ecorded i n t he l iterary s ources: t he v isit o f C onstans i n t he winter o f A D 3 42-3 , A D 3 60,
t he c ampaign o f L upercinus
t he b arbarian c onspiracy o f AD 3 67,
i n t he n orth
i n
t he u surp t ion o f Magnus
Maximus AD 3 83-8 a nd t he r e-organisation o f t he B ritish d efences b y S tilicho
i n A D
3 96.
V ery
f ew
b uilding
f ourth-century d ate a re known; Maximianus
f rom
B irdoswald
( RIB
1 912)
i nscription f rom R oman B ritain . f irst
half
o f
t he
f ourth
c entury
t he l ater f ourth c entury, t ype a round A D c loser h eavily
means
3 60 o n ,
i s
t he
l atest
I n t he n orth, c annot b e
h owever ,
o f
p ossibly
c losely
d atable
t he p ottery o f
m ore p recisely
t he
d ated .
I n
with t he emergence o f t he H untcliff
a nd o f C rambeck p archment ware a d ecade l ater,
o f d ating a re a vailable .
r elied
i nscriptions
t he i nscription o f Diocletian a nd
a nd
t hus
N umismatic
t he d ating o f
o ften p recision c annot b e a ttained .
e vidence h as
m any s ites
Many o f
t o b e
i s d ifficult,
a s
t he e vents n oted i n t his
c hapter a re o ften d ated b y a s ingle c oin p roviding a t erminus p ost q uem , b ut h ow c losely t hese c oins c an d ate t he b uilding work i s v ery d ifficult t o a scertain . All t he work d escribed, h owever, a lmost c ertainly d ates
t o b efore A D 3 67 a nd o ften ,
n o d oubt,
w ell b efore t hat
d ate. T he
r e-organisation o f
n orthern f rontier, b efore
his
d eath
C onstantine was
t hat
d efences o f B ritain,
i n J uly A D
immediately
t hought
t he
e specially o f
t he
may have b een c ompleted b y C onstantius C hlorus 3 06.
l eft
h e n ever
f or
On h is a ccession t o t he t hrone, t he
C ontinent
r eturned,
b ut
a nd
u ntil
r ecently
C asey n ow b elieves
i t
t hat
C onstantine v isited B ritain o n two s ubsequent o ccasions. H e n otes t hat t here a re t hree i ssues o f a dventus c oins m inted a t L ondon i n t he r eign o f C onstantine . A dventus c oins a re n ot k nown a t t his t ime t o h ave b een s truck t o c ommemorate a d istant e vent a nd t he a dventus c oins o f
t he Constantinian p eriod a re a ll a ssociated with v isits
emperor
t o t he v icinity o f
o f
t he
t he m int .
T he f irst a dventus i ssue d ating t o AD 3 07 i s r epresented b y o nly o ne c oin which C asey d oubts t hat i ts a ctually
i s
g enuine b ut,
e ven i f i t
r arity implies t hat a visit, i f t ake p lace. T he s econd i ssue,
i ncludes c oins o f s everal d ifferent
t ypes
i s, h e s uggests
c ontemplated, which i s t he
d id n ot l argest,
d ating t o c irca A D 3 12 which
had p reviously b een t hought t o c ommemorate C onstantine's e ntry i nto R ome a fter t he d efeat o f Maxentius. Although a v isit t o Britain b etween J uly A D 3 10 a nd 3 11, o r b efore t he s ummer o f A D 3 12, would n ot h ave c onflicted with C onstantine's
known movements, n o mention o f
s uch a visit i s made i n t he p anegyric o f e ither J uly A D 3 10 o r a nd
C asey
s uggests
t hat
i t
i s
9 1
3 11,
m ore l ikely t hat h e was i n B ritain
e arly i n AD
3 12.
E usebius n otes t hat C onstantine visited Britain
a fter he had b een e stablished i n power ( de v ita C onstantini 1 , 2 5). Z osimus r ecords t hat s ome t roops were t aken f rom Britain t o j oin C onstantine's p resence
o f
a rmy t he
f or
t he
emperor
i nvasion
may
have
o f
I taly
b een
i n
AD
3 12;
t he
r equired
t o
o versee
t he
r edisposition o f f orces t hat t his would h ave entailed. i ssue
d ates
o n
m int
m ark
e vidence
T he t hird
t o a fter S eptember A D
3 13 o r
t o A D
3 14 . C onstantine c ould have b een i n B ritain between A pril a nd O ctober A D 3 14 . T he t itle B ritannicus Maximus a ssumed b y C onstantine i n A D 3 15 would s uggest s ome m ilitary a ction i n t he d iocese . C asey 3 12
s uggests
f rom
t hat
t he
C onstantine
f orts
o f
High
withdrew
R ochester
t roops a nd
f rom
t he n orth
P iercebridge,
i n A D
a nd
a lso
p ossibly f rom Newcastle, E bchester a nd R isingham ( Casey 1 978).
A t
H igh R ochester, R ichmond n oted t he a pparent d iscrepancy b etween t he h eavy wear o n t he t hreshold o f a n i nterval-tower o f C onstantian d ate implying
l ong u se ,
a nd
t he
l ack
o f
s upport
f or
t his
i nterpretation
" by a ny p ottery s o f ar r ecovered a nd d erives s till l ess s upport t he c oin l ist which d oes n ot o utlast C arausius" ( Richmond 1 936, 2 ).
f rom 1 21-
H e s uggested t hat t he f ort may have b een a bandoned a s a result
o f t he t roubles o f A D 3 43 o r 3 60 . C asey b elieves t hat t he a bsence o f c oins o f t he p eriod AD 3 30-41 makes o ccupation o f t he f ort u p t o A D 3 43 i mpossible . t ype A D
T he p resence o f a t l east o ne
f rom R isingham
3 60-70
p eriods
a t
o f
t he
i mplies
t hat
e arliest.
t he
f ort w as
There
were
o ccupation a t Risingham
s herd o f
t he H untcliff
o ccupied
i n t he
a lso
two
d ecade
fourth-century
( High R ochester
only h ad one);
Casey s uggested a t emporary a bandonment o f t he s ite i n t he earlier f ourth
c entury
( Casey
1 978 ,
1 90) .
An a bandonment a t B ewcastle c ould a lso h ave o ccurred a t t his t ime b ut, l ike R isingham , i t must h ave b een o f a t emporary n ature . P rofessor E . B irley t ype
I nformed Mr .
f rom
t he
a bandonment
J .P .
s ite .
o f
t he
G illam Mr.
f ort
t hat h e h ad s een a p iece o f H untcliff
G illam
u nder
would
b e
C onstantine .
p leased T he
t o
a ccept
a n
i nternal b ath-house
s eems t o have b een d emolished i n t he e arlier f ourth c entury rather t han h aving b een d estroyed b y t he e nemy o r c ollapsed .
T he r ubble l ay
d irectly o n t he b ath-house f loors a nd a c oin o f C onstantine I i n g ood c ondition d ating t o A D 3 09-10 t ogether with a g old e arring w ere f ound r esting o n t he f loor o f t he c old bath ( Gillam 1 954).
T he b uilding
must have b een o ut o f u se when t hese o bjects were l ost. bath-house
s ite was
r e-occupied,
a b uilding was
s et
When t he
o n e arth
a nd
c ompletely i gnored t he e arlier r emains . O n
n umismatic
AD
3 00 o r c irca
e vidence,
P iercebridge
A D 3 12.
b een a bandoned a t e ither o f
t hese t wo
b uilt a t a t ime when many f orts r eoccupation s uperfluous . h ave b een B ridge
c ould h ave
b een
a bandoned
c irca
Why t he r elatively n ew f ort s hould have d ates
i s
n ot
c lear;
i t h ad
b een
i n t he n orth were r un d own and t he
i n s trength o f t he n orth m ay h ave r endered P iercebridge C asey s uggests t hat t he p opulation f rom t he v icus m ay
m oved
( Casey
t o
1 978 ,
t he n ewly p lanned a nd b uilt 1 90) .
T here
i s
o nly
f ourth-century p ottery f rom E bchester,
v icus
o ne p iece
a C order t ype
a t
o f
n earby
p ublished
G reta l ate
1 0 p archment ware
b owl ( Jarrett, 1 960A, 2 12, No.10). C asey s uggests t hat i f t he r eo rganisation a t t his t ime d id i nclude t he n orth, t hen t his may have b een t he o ccasion f or t he T he withdrawal o f C onstantine
t o
i nstitution o f
t roops
r eturn
may have
l ed
t o B ritain i n A D
9 2
t he d ux B ritanniarum c ommand . t o
3 14 .
t he
events
which
forced
I n t he f ourth c entury a n ew g ateway s eems t o h ave b een c onstructed a t B rough-on-Noe 6 .1m s outh w est o f t he p resumed s ite o f t he m ain s outhe ast g ate . I n 1 958 t he e xcavator f ound a s ubstantial wall r unning s outh west t o n orth e ast a long t he i nner l ip o f t he i nner d itch a nd t hought i t p art o f av icus b uilding; i t was 7 6cm t hick a nd a t l east 1.23m l ong ( Bartlett 1 959) . A c auseway f ound o ver t he i nner d itch was o f p itched s tone a nd b eneath i t was a c oin o f C onstantine I ( Bartlett 1 960). T he o ther t wo d itches a t t his p oint h ad a lso p robably b een f illed i n a nd a g ravel s urface l aid o ver t hem .
T he wall
f ound i n 1 958 was t he f ort w all a nd t he c auseway g ave a ccess t o a g ap c ut t hrough t he f ort wall which t hen t urned t hrough 9 0° a nd c ontinued s outh west b etween t he c ut b ack r ampart o f A ntonine d ate r evetted b y a r oughly-built s tone wall a nd t he f ort wall ( Jones G . a nd W ild 1 969A ) . T he c arefully b uilt c auseway with a s hort c entral d rain c apped with l imestone f lags was n ot m ore t han 2 .13m wide . T he e xcavators o f 1 969 t hought t hat a n arrow s ide g ate , a llied t o a d ouble b end , w ould n ot b e s o i nconvenient f or h orsemen - a t l east s ome o f t he g arrison were c avalry a t t his t ime . T hey s uggested t hat t he p eriod I II s tructures m ay b e c ontemporary with t his n ew g ateway a nd b e c onnected with a r ethinking o f s trategy c onsequent o n C onstantine's a rmy r eforms . W hy a n ew g ate would b e n eeded i s u nclear , n or w hy i t s hould b e o f s uch a n u nusual a nd a wkward p lan .
P resumably
i n
t he
e arlier
f ourth
c entury
t he s trongroom i n t he p rincipia was f illed w ith s tones, a rchitectural f ragments, e arth a nd d ebris, b ones, p ottery a nd a f ew f ourth-century c oins ( Garstang 1 904 , 1 92) . A s lightly-worn c oin o f A D 3 26 f rom t he c onstruction t rench o f t he Wery Wall a t L ancaster h as b een u sed t o d ate t he wall t o t he s econd q uarter o f t he f ourth c entury ( Jones G . D ore a nd A lker 1 974). R ichmond h ad s uggested t hat t he f ort may h ave b een a n aval b ase o f V alentinianic d ate ( Petch J . 1 9 _ 59) . L eather b elieves t hat i n v iew o f t he Wery W all's
r elationship
t o
t he e arly f ourth-century d itch
t o
i ts
n orth a nd t o o ther e arly f ourth-century l evels, i t s hould b e d ated t o t he l ater f ourth c entury ( Leather 1 971). R ichmond s ectioned t his wall and f ound i t t o have b een s et i n a f lat-bottomed f oundation t rench 2 .59m wide f illed w ith t ightly-packed massive b roken s tones, m any o f t hem r e-used ( Richmond 1 953 , 5 ) . I n t he 2 0s, t he u pstanding f ragment o f t he wall was a mass o f r ubble c ore 3 .05m l ong b y n early 2 .13m high. N o f acers r emained i n s itu ( Droop a nd N ewstead 1 928). R ichmond t hought t hat h e h ad f ound a b astion p rojecting t o t he n orth o f t he wall b ut t his i s n ow k nown t o b e ar oom a ssociated w ith a b athh ouse o f t hird-century d ate i n t he p raetorium ( Potter 1 974B). N o r ampart b ank a ssociated with t his wall h as b een n oted, t hough t he d enuded s tate f or
i ts
o f
a bsence .
t he
l ate
l evels
A ntiquarian
d oes n ot p rovide c onclusive e vidence
o bservations
s uggest
t hat
o ne w all
o f
t he f ort was o ver 1 83m l ong a nd h ad a t l east o ne p rojecting a nglet ower ( Collingwood a nd R ichmond 1 969, 5 6). V irtually n othing i s k nown o f t he f ort's i nterior a t t his p eriod; a f ew p ost-holes h ave b een l ocated , b ut n ot e nough t o s uggest t he l ayout o f b uildings ( Jones G . D ore a nd Alker 1 974). A part f rom t he b astion n oted o n a n 1 8th c entury map, t here i s l ittle t o s uggest t hat t he f ort b ore a ny r esemblance t o t hose o f
t he S axon S hore a nd a t
C ardiff .
T he l ast R oman a ddition t o t he r ampart b ank b ehind t he n orth-west w all a t Y ork i s d ated b y a c oin o f D elmatius t o a fter A D 3 35-7 . T he c oin w as t oo c orroded t o a llow a ny a ttempt t o a ssess i ts p ossible l ife i n c irculation b efore l oss. A s n oted i n c hapter 3 , Wenham s uggested
9 3
t hat t his c oin may p rovide a t erminus p ost q uem f or t he b uilding o f t he ' Constantian' d efences. E xcavations b y Mr.
w ithin
t he
p raetorium
J . P roud i n 1 878,
1 891.
F urther
work
a t
B inchester
were
f irst
c onducted
t he r esults b eing p ublished by Hooppell i n was
b egun
here
i n
t he
1 970s
and
i s
s till
c ontinuing . T he e xcavators n ow d ate t he c onstruction o f t he l atest b uilding, p hase 6 o n t he s ite, t o c irca A D 3 40. B eneath a p rimary f loor was t hrough
s ealed a c oin o f
f our
A D
s ub-phases,
3 35-45 .
t he
T he
d ates
o f
b uilding
which
a re
O ccupation r eflected b y l ate pottery c ontinued
i n
t hereafter a s
yet
t he
went
u nclear .
l ate fourth
c entury, t hough t he c oin l ist c omes t o a n e nd c irca A D 3 70 ( Ferris a nd J ones, R . 1 979). A s f irst c onstructed, t he b uilding s eems t o have b een a c ourtyard h ouse ,
a s h ad b een t hat o f
r ange b y t he via p rincipalis was c ontaining
t wo h ypocausted
t he p receding p hase .
f ree s tanding,
r ooms .
b eing
T he
6m wide
and
T he o ther r ooms were s pacious
a nd
had o pus s igninum f loors a nd plastered walls.
A k itchen with two
ovens was f ound a nd a lso a r oom with f our s uccessive o pus s igninum f loors
with q uarter
r ound
m ouldings .
S evere s ubsidence
i nto a p hase
5 h ypocaust h ad n ecessitated t he r ebuilding o f a wall a nd t he l aying o f a new f loor ( Jones R . 1 978). S ub-phase 6 a extended for a c onsiderable p eriod . T he
d itch
a nd
r efuse
a t
t he
i n
n orth-west
t he
f ourth
a ngle
was
c entury.
d eliberately Over
t his
p robably a cross t he f ull width o f t he d itch, f loor
i nterrupted b y a n o ven .
f ourth-century t he o uter
d ate .
l ip o f
C ons t ans.
A s econd
d itch
T he a t
l aid
was a c lay-and-cobble
f rom
o ver
t he d itch s ealed b elow
t his
t he
f loor
c obble
o f
n ear
i ts f lagged base a c oin o f
d rains were
c ontemporary with
t he
n orth-east
c ould
d ate
t o
t he f ort
wall ,
w hilst
a ngle
o verlay
t he f ourth
t he
c entury
p artly-filled ( Steer
d itch ,
a small a rea b y t he a ngle-tower ,
were c overed b y a n ew ,
a n i nterval-tower,
f oundation, was c onstructed.
t hese
1 938) .
S ome t ime a fter t he b eginning o f t he f ourth c entury,
t he s ame t ime,
t he
S teer s uggested t hat a s t he t ank in t he
t he workshops
b ehind t he n orth r ampart a t H ousesteads were a bandoned a nd, A t
were
f loor
a ngle which d e l iouched i nto a c ircular t ank o n t he s imilar t ank f ound b y P roud l ay in t he
t anks were o f l ater d ate. f eatures
o ven
s oil
e xtending
A d rain was f ound a t t his angle s imilar t o t hat f ound b y
P roud a t t he n orth-east t he e dge o f t he b erm; d itch .
A f ew s herds
f illed w ith
f illing,
e xcept f or
wider r ampart .
f ounded o n a m assive whin b oulder
T he r evetting kerb o f t he r ampart b y
t he n orth g ate was n ow r emoved a nd i n t he r obber t rench l eft b y t his was a c oin o f C onstantine I I, A D 3 37-40 ( Daniels 1 980B, 1 0) . Another l ate i nterval-tower was a t s ome d ate a dded t o t he e ast wall . I n t he e xcavations a t B ewcastle i n o ccupation
were
n oted ,
y et
t here
1 937, was
t wo p eriods
n o e vidence
o f
o f
f ourth-century
o ccupation
a fter
AD 3 67. T he f irst p eriod was d ated t o C onstantius C hlorus a nd t he s econd t o A D 3 43, p erhaps r esulting f rom t he t rouble in t he north which b rought C onstans t o t he d iocese i n t he w inter o f A D 3 42-3 . T he p resumed v iolent d estruction o f t he b ath-house e xcavated i n 1 954 a nd 1 956 t o
( Gillam
t he
1 957) was
t roubles
t hought
t o b e
c ontemporary
which b rought L upercinus
t rouble m ust h ave b een t o t he n orth Ammianus r ecords t hat:
9 4
o r
c ould h ave
t o B ritain i n A D
o f H adrian's
Wall .
3 60 .
d ated T his
" Raids
o f
t he
s avage
t ribes
o f
t he S cots
a nd P icts
who h ad b roken t he
p eace t hat had b een a greed u pon, were l aying waste t he r egions n ear t he f rontiers s o t hat f ear s eized t he provincials, were b y a m ass o f p ast c alamaties" . ( A .M . X XI 1 ) .
worried a s t hey
I n t he p eriod I V r ebuilding o f t he f ort,
i t was p rovided with a n ew
d efensive
wall.
wall
f oundations
a nd a wall
The
b uilding S t .
a nd
a butted a gainst
t he
a nd
1 938) .
Mr .
d imensions,
o bliquely
P .
r educed
t o
i ts
t he p artly-
a r ough e xtension o f a f ourth-century b ack
o f
t he
wall
( Richmond,
A usten f ound a w all o f
t hough
a cross
was
T he f oundations were o f r oughly-dressed, b ut
s labs
J oseph
s tone
1 .75m t hick e rected o n t he c rest o f
d emolished r ampart. f reshly-quarried
earlier
b uilt
a s treet
without
o f h is p eriod
a ny
I II
H odgson
a nd
s imilar c onstruction
f oundations,
( early
r unning
t hird c entury);
a
c ontemporary c apped d rain a ppeared t o h ave b een a c ulvert t hrough t his wall which,
h e
R ichmond .
I f
t entatively s o,
t ime .
H e s uggests
t hat
a nd
presumably
d id
i t
c ircuit .
s uggests,
t he f ort
O verlying
t his n ot
may b e
t he n ew
f ort
wall d ates
t o
i ncorporate
t he b ath-house ,
t he e arly
t he
t he
p orta
f ourth
1 957).
Mr.
J .P .
G illam's
b efore I t
i s
t he
d ecumana
p ossible
t hat
f ound by t he Rev .
r ecollection t he H untcliff
t he n orth-west
r ebuilt
o f
t he
i ts
p ottery
a
( Gillam
f rom
t his
t ype .
a ngle-tower
i n t he f ourth
H .A .
i n
l ate a s o ne c ould g et i n t he f ourth c entury
i ntroduction o f
s ubstantially
t his
c entury,
f inal p eriod s tructure was
s imple r ectangular building, " resembling a barrack-block", b uilding i s t hat i t was a s
wall o f
must have b een r educed i n a rea a t
c entury .
Whitelaw c irca
1 900,
G reat
C hesters
was
A c oin o f
a t
C onstans
was
r eputedly i n a c revice
b etween t he t hird a nd f ourth c ourses o f t he s outh-east wall o f t he t ower,
b ut
t he e vidence i s s uspect a s
" jokingly s uggested t hat wall ,
i t
i s r ecorded t hat
t he R everend
t hey m ight f ind a c oin i n t he c revices o f
t he
whereupon h e s cratched with a k nife b etween t he s tones a nd f ound
t he c oin i n q uestion" ( Shaw
1 925-6).
Daniels a ccepts t he e vidence
a nd hence s uggests a s ubstantial r ebuilding o f 1 978A,
1 81).
t he
t ower
( Daniels
N o i ndication o f s econdary work o n t he t ower c an b e
s een. A t H ousesteads a t s ome t ime d uring t he f ourth c entury, t here were a lterations i n t he h ospital when p art, a t l east, o f t he o uter wall h ad b een r ebuilt - a l ate mortarium r im was s ealed b eneath t he l owest c ourse,
( this
r im m ay b e e arlier t han t he e xcavator t hought) .
A c oin
o f M axentius was f ound i n a n i nternal wall a nd a c oin d ated t o A D 3 305 c ame f rom b etween s ome l ate f lagging.
T he p resence o f hearths
( some showing e vidence o f i ntensive b urning) i n t he northern e nd o f t he
building
( Charlesworth
s uggested 1 976 ,
t hat
i t
had
b een
I n t he e arlier f ourth c entury a t C hester , o f t he p raetorium , a nd
a
s late
a ssociated b uilding was
u sed
metal
working
a b uilding was e rected n orth
p robably with h alf-timbered walls o n s tone f ootings
r oof
with
r ubbish,
p ossibly
t here
was
t imber-partition
evidence
d emolished a nd o ccupation o f
o f
t imber-framed b uildings
metal
walls.
o f
I n
working.
t he s ite c eased,
t he AD 3 30s, o r s oon a fter ( Strickland 1 980). a nd C rook S treet,
f or
1 9-20) .
t he T he
p robably i n
I n U pper G oss S treet
c irca A D 3 40-50 h ave b een
f ound a ssociated w ith f inds o f c hip-carved m etalwork . T he f ormer was b uilt o f t imbers s et i n b edding t renches whilst t he l atter was b uilt u sing
i ndividual
p ost-holes.
9 5
B oth
a t
A bbey
G reen
a nd
o n
t he
N orthgate B rewery s ite , f inds i ndicate r emains h ad b een r emoved b y p loughing .
o ccupation b ut t he s tructural A t t his t ime t he p rincipia ,
p raetorium a nd e lliptical b uilding s eem t o have s tood a lone i n a p aved a rea ( McPeake 1 978) . A b uilding e xcavated i n H unters Walk i n 1 980 may have b een p art o f t he p raetorium; i t was d emolished i n t he l ate f ourth c entury ( Strickland 1 98110 . B y t he m id f ourth c entury, s tructures were b eing b uilt o ver t he l evelled r ampart a butting o nto t he f ort wall a t D oncaster ( Buckland a nd
Magilton
1 976).
b uildings i n t he f ourth c entury.
A t
C hesterholm
t he
t hird-century
b arrack-
n orth-east p raetentura were f urther m odified i n t he T hey were d emolished i n t he l ater f ourth c entury
a fter c irca A D 3 60 , b eing r eplaced b y o ne o r l ittle r emained ( Bidwell 1 981) . I n t he m id f ourth c entury,
m ore s tructures
o f
which
a n umber o f s ites m ay h ave b een r eoccupied
a nd s ome were b uilt f or t he f irst t ime . A t C aernarvon, a s n oted i n c hapter 3 , t he f ort may have l ain u noccupied f rom c irca A D 2 90 t o a t l east A D 3 25 a nd p robably
l ater .
T he p rincipia c ertainly w ould s eem
t o have b een a bandoned a t t his t ime. T he l atest c oin f ound i n t he i ron-bound b ox i n t he s trongroom was a m int c oin o f C arausius . B eneath t he n ew c ourtyard m etalling was a p urse c ontaining 1 6 c oins r anging f rom G allienus t o C rispus . T he f ourth-century c oins were i n v ery g ood o r m int c ondition ( Wheeler 1 922, 2 93) . T he d eposition o f a hoard
( if
t hat i s what i t i s) i n s uch a p ublic p lace must i ndicate
t hat t he b uilding was n ot i n u se . O n r eoccupation o f t he b uilding, t he c ourtyard was r emetalled ; t he n orth-west wall o f t he c ourtyard was r ebuilt s lightly a skew, p robably a t t his t ime , a nd t he s outh-west wall was p atched a nd p artly r ebuilt f rom i ts f ootings. T he c olonnades,
i f
t hey were s till s tanding ,
were d emolished,
s ome o f
l arge b ase b locks b eing r emoved whilst o thers w ere i ncorporated i n , c overed b y t he n ew c ourtyard m etalling .
t he o r
A n ew c olonnade b uilt o f r e-
u sed material was t hen l aid o ut ( fig 3 6 .1) . T he s trongroom was n ow h alf f illed w ith d ebris , p robably f rom t he d emolished a psidal r oom 1 0,
a nd l evelled with l oose yellow c ement u p t o t he height o f
t he
s outh-eastern w all o f t he s trongroom which h ad b een d enuded o f i ts t wo u ppermost c ourses . I n t he c ement a nd d ebris w ere 2 0 c oins, t he l atest b eing a C onstantinopolis m inim f ound n ear t he b ottom o f t he f illing. T he c ement f loor s oon s ubsided a nd was r enewed - t he e xcavator s uggested p robably v ery q uickly. I t c ontained c oins o f U rbs R oma a nd C onstantinopolis t ype a nd a lso t wo m inims, o ne b eing a G loria E xercitus
t ype.
Wheeler had s uggested t hat
t he f ort
was
a bandoned u ntil c irca A D 3 50 b ut t he c oin e vidence f rom t he p rincipia d oes n ot s uggest s uch a l ate d ate . S ealed i n t he mortar o f t he o uter wall o f r oom 1 i n t he p raetorium, h owever, was a m int c oin o f C ons t ans, A D 3 48-50 ( Wheeler 1 921, 1 93). A t t his t ime t he b uilding was e xtensively r ebuilt, o ver h alf o f i ts walls were r ebuilt f rom t heir f ootings
( fig 4 0 .3 ) .
P robably a t t he t ime o f t he f ort's r eoccupation , e xtensive a lterations were m ade • t o t he n orth-west g ate . T he s outh-west, a nd p robably t he n orth-east g uardrooms went o ut o f u se a nd w ere i ncorporated i nto t he r ampart b acking . T he s pina was d emolished a nd i ts f oundation t rench was f illed w ith b oulders a nd d amaged c olumn c apitals . T he n orth-east c arriage-way was w idened a nd s eparated f rom t he n ew g uardroom i n t he s outh-west c arriage-way b y a wall .
T he g uardroom was c losed o ff f rom
t he o utside b y d ouble d oors which,
d ue t o t he r ise i n g round l evel
9 6
within t he g ate, o pened o utwards ( fig 2 2.1A). I n t he s outh-west g ateway t he s pina w as a gain d emolished a nd a b uttressed w all was b uilt a cross t he s outh-east p ortal . B ecause t he l evel within t he n orthe ast p ortal w as h igher t han o utside t he f ort, t he g ate was e ntered u p t wo s tone s teps. Within t he s outh-east g uardroom a r oughly-built s tone p latform was i nserted . T he m ake-up o f t his p latform i ncluded c olumn d rums a nd a b arbarous c oin o f f ourth-century d ate which l ed W heeler t o b elieve t he s tructure
t o b e p ost-Roman
( fig
2 2 .1B) .
T he d ate s uggested b y W heeler o f a round A D 3 50 f or t he r eoccupation o f t he f ort would s eem r easonable o n t he e vidence f rom t he p rincipa a nd p raetorium b ut i s n ow d oubted . S ome s cholars f eel t hat t he l arge n umber o f e arlier f ourth-century c oins e xcludes t he p ossibility o f t he s ite h aving b een a bandoned b ut i t i s p ossible t hat t he s ituation h ere w as a nalogous t o t hat a t S outh S hields i n t he e arlier f ourth c entury when t he f ort s ite was p resumably o ccupied b y c ivilians. H ere t he e xcavator s uggested t hat a m ilitary g arrison m ay h ave b een i nstalled i n t he f irst q uarter o f t he f ourth c entury ( Dore a nd G illam 1 979 , 7 0 ) . A s n o military s tructures o f t he f ourth c entury h ave b een i dentified , t he d ate o f t he r eoccupation i s v ery d ifficult t o a scertain . A s ection a cross t he d efences o f C aernarvon i n
1 975 s uggested t hat t he
s tone wall d ates t o t he e arly f ourth c entury. I n 1 978, a f urther s ection c onfirmed i ts f ourth-century d ate ( Casey a nd D avies 1 976; 1 979 ) .
W heeler h ad f ound t he w all o n t he n orth-west s ide o f
t he f ort
t o b e o nly 1 .16m t hick a t t he b ase a nd i ts b attered i nner f ace r educed t he wall t o 7 6cm t hick a t t he p resent s urviving h eight o f 2 .13m ( Wheeler 1 921,
1 72).
T he b ath-house ' S' i n t h s outh-east c orner o f
t he p raetentura p roduced c oins f rom i ts s toking d ebris o f c irca A D 3 50-400 ( Casey a nd Davies 1 978). T he c ourtyard i n b uilding ' A' was u sed
f or
r ubbish
d isposal
i n
t he
p eriod
c irca
A D
3 30-348 .
I t
c ontained a t l east n ine pits. A t imber c ookhouse o f t he C onstantinian p eriod l ay t o t he e ast o f b ath-house a nd w as s et o n a n e xtensive s pread o f c lay w hich s ealed t he v ia s agularis . A s econd t imber b uilding, a lso s et o n t he c lay, l ay e ast o f b uilding ' A ' ( Casey a nd D avies 1 977) . O n t he b asis o f t he p ublished e vidence I would b e i nclined t o a ccept Wheeler's d ating o f t he f ort's a bandonment f rom c irca A D 2 93-350 . B oon , o n t he n umismatic e vidence , s uggested t hat t he f ort w s r e-occupied c irca A D A D 3 53 ( Boon 1 974, 1 35) .
3 69 a fter v irtual a bandonment
F orden G aer was r eoccupied i n t he f ourth c entury, p eriod o f a bandonment ,
s ince
p ossibly a fter a
a nd t he n orth-south r oad w as f ound t o h ave b een
r efurbished ( period 3 B/4A ), t he f ourth-century r oad b eing o f r ougher w orkmanship t han t hose b efore i t . I n o ne a rea i t w s l argely c omposed o f b roken r oof t iles . L arge , r ough-hewn s tones w ere s et a t i ntervals a long t he edge i n period 3 A/3B and i n period 3 B/4A t his was s trengthened ( Pryce a nd P ryce 1 929). A t t he s outh-west a ngle, t he r ampart
was
widened,
n ecessitating
t he
r epositioning
o f
t he
i ntervallum r oad which was o f c obbles c irca 2 .44m wide . I n t his a ngle , t he b uilding o f t hird-century d ate was r ebuilt a nd a bout 1 8cm o f d isturbed s oil u nderlay t he n ew f loor o f c lay. L arge p iers o f c obble a nd r ough-hewn s tones s et i n c lay r ested o n t he e arlier f loor which presumably c arried t imber u prights. B etween t he p iers were t races o f c obble walls; t he b uildings had b een r oofed with s lates ( Pryce a nd P ryce
1 930 ) .
4 A b y o nly a b urnt l ayer ;
P eriod 4 B
i n t his
b uilding was
t he p iers w ere r aised
9 7
d ivided f rom
b y t he a ddition
o f
f lat s tones. T he c lay f loor o f t his p eriod was m uch t hicker a nd r ested o n g ravel , t he w hole b eing 2 0-28cm t hick . T he r oof w as a gain c overed b y s lates . A f urther p eriod o f a ctivity s eems t o b e i ndicated b y t he a ddition o f 1 5cm o f c lay t o t he f loor i n o ne a rea w hile t he smaller r oom a ppears t o h ave b een g iven u p a s t he s ite was c overed b y a t hick , b adly-constructed r oad . N o d ating e vidence f or 4 B o r t his l ater p hase was n oted; t he l atest c oin f rom t he s ite i s o f V alentinian I . T he f ort a t P iercebridge w as r e-occupied c irca A D 3 50 , t hough n ot a s i ntensively a s i t h ad b een i n t he l ater t hird c entury ( Scott 1 978) . A t t his t ime t here was s ome b uilding work within t he f ort w hen t he s outh p ortal o f t he e ast g ate w as b locked a nd t he e arlier r oad t o t he g ateway w as
c ut
t hrough b y t he m ain l atrine d rain f rom t he n orth-east
a ngle . T he r oad was t hen r esurfaced f or t he l ast t ime . N either t he l atrine d rain n or t he " barrack-block" s outh o f t he e ast g ate was p ositioned p arallel t o t he f ort wall , b ut r an p arallel t o e ach o ther which s uggests t hat t hey may b oth p ost d ate t he d efences. T he s oc alled " barrack-block" w hich i s n ow k nown t o b e i n f act t he e ast r ange o f a c ourtyard b uilding ( Fig 5 2 .1) h ad t wo r ooms h eated b y ah ypocaust a nd a lso h ad p ainted wall p laster . T here w as a lso m uch p ainted wall p laster o n t he e xterior w all , p resumably w here i t w as p rotected b y a v eranda . T his r ange o f r ooms i s p robably o f m uch l ater d ate t han t he b ath-house, f orming t he s outhern r ange, t hough t his r emained i n u se a nd was modified i n t he mid-fourth c entury . T hese modifications i ncluded t he i nsertion o f n ew h eating f acilities a s w ell a s d rains a nd a l atrine . T he s outh-east r oom was h ypocausted; t he p ilae s howed s igns o f h eavy b urning b ut t he walls d id n ot . T he e xcavator s uggested t hat t he s ystem was l ittle u sed, t he p ilae being r e-used ( Scott 1 978 ) . T he 7 m w ide b erm s outh o f t he e ast g ate h ad a c obbled s urface which h ad l ater b een r esurfaced w ith l arge s tones . C ut i nto t his m etalled s urface were t wo r ows o f p its r unning p arallel t o t he f ort wall , t he p its o f o ne r ow b eing s et i n t he g aps b etween t he p its o f t he o ther r ow . T he e xcavators b elieve t hese t o b e l ilia a nd t o b e c onnected with t he s ub-ditch c ut i nto t he western s ide o f t he main d efensive d itch . T hey p robably d ate t o c irca A D 3 50 r ather t han A D 2 70
( Scott a nd L arge
1 980,
1 2).
I f
t he
l atrine d rain b y t he
e ast
g ate i s c ontemporary with t hat i n t he n orth-east a ngle, t hen t he l atrine b uilding ( Fig 2 5 .4 ) m ay a lso d ate t o t he m id-fourth c entury , a s would p resumably t he b uilding t o t he s outh west o f t he l atrine . Mr . J .P. G illam i nforms m e t hat t he p ottery f rom t he l atrine i n t he n orth-east a ngle w as o f m id f ourth-century d ate .
c ulvert
Small-scale e xcavations were c arried o ut a t N ewbrough i n F ebruary, 1 930 . A s hort a ccount w as p ublished s oon a fter ( Simpson F . 1 929-30 ), b ut m ore i nformation i ncluding p lans, s ections a nd p ottery d rawings i s t o
b e
f ound
i n t he u npublished n otes
a ctual d igging . J .P . G illam).
o f Mr .
T .
H epple who d id
t he
( A c opy o f t hese n otes was k indly s hown t o m e b y M r . T he f ortlet ( Fig 1 5 .2), which m easured c irca 5 9 .48m
n orth s outh b y 5 7.95m e ast west e nclosing a bout 0 .3 h a, was d efended b y a d itch p erhaps o riginally c irca 4 .57m wide b y 1 .52m d eep a nd a s tone wall 1 .22m t hick s et b ack 4 .88m f rom t he d itch . N o r ampart b ank was n oted . A g ap i n t he m iddle o f t he s outh d itch i mplies a g ateway h ere ( Birley E . 1 961, 1 48) . T he p ottery , o f which 1 s herds were
d rawn,
C rambeck J .P .
t ype
s pans l b
t he
m id t o l ate-fourth c entury.
f langed b owl
G illam s uggests
s uggests
p ost A D
3 67
One s herd o f
o ccupation .
M r .
t hat t he p ottery i ndicates a d ate a round t he m id-
9 8
f ourth c entury r ather t han c irca A D 3 70 f or t he b eginning o f t he o ccupation . Ac oin o f C onstantine I was f ound b y t he s exton i n t he c hurchyard i n 1 930 . C ardurnock m ilefortlet 5 ( Fig 1 6 .1), j ust t o t he e ast o f Moricambe, m ay h ave b een r eoccupied i n t he m id-fourth c entury . T he e xcavators n oted t hat p eriod I II s eemed t o d ate t o e ither s ide o f A D 3 67; t he weight o f material, h owever, f alls a fter A D 3 69 . " Thus t he m eagre e vidence w ould i n f act s uit a n o ccupation c ommencing i n A D 3 43 j ust a s well a s o ne b eginning i n A D 2 97" ( Simpson, F . a nd H odgson 1 948, 1 25). T he s ite h ad b een a bandoned f rom t he l ate s econd c entury u ntil t hat d ate . T he p eriod I II s tructures h ad b een m uch d amaged b y t he p lough . O n t he r eoccupation o f t he s ite, t he s outh, west a nd n orth r amparts w ere r econditioned , t he o uter f ace o f t he r ampart b eing c ut b ack 1 .67m a nd a n ew f ace a dded . V ery f ew s tructures o f t his p eriod s urvived ; ap latform o f c lay a nd c obbles 2 .13 b y 3 .96m f aced i n s tone w as f ound - t he e xcavators s uggested t hat i t w as a b allistarium . Ab razier m ay h ave s tood i n t he w est a ngle . D aniels s uggests t hat t he r eduction i n s ize o f t he f ortlet b etween p eriods I a nd I I , d ated w ithin t he s econd c entury, c ould p erhaps e qually well f it t he f ourth-century r eoccupation o f t he s ite ( Daniels 1 978A , 2 65 ) . T here i s v ery l ittle e vidence t o s uggest t he r e-use o f o ther m ilefortlets a nd t owers o n t he C umberland c oast . M ost o f t hese w ent o ut o f u se i n t he s econd c entury . P otter s uggested t hat m ilefortlets 5 , 1 2 a nd 2 0 m ay s how e vidence o f h aving b een r ecommissioned s ome t ime i n t he f ourth c entury ( Potter 1 977 , 1 83) . A t m ilefortlet 1 2 , o nly o ne p iece o f l ate p ottery h as b een r ecovered ( Bellhouse 1 966 , 3 8 ; 1 969 ) . F ourth-century s herds w ere r ecovered f rom m ilefortlet 2 0 c lose b y a h earth w hich w as u nrelated t o a ny s tructure , l ying o n b lown s and w hich s ealed t he e arlier l evels . T he 1 0 s herds f ound c ould h ave c ome f rom t he s ame p ot ( Bellhouse 1 970 , 2 4 ,31) . O ne p iece o f t hird o r f ourthc entury c ooking p ot h as b een f ound a t t ower 1 6a ( Richmond 1 956). T hese a re t he o nly p ublished p ieces o f p ottery ( excepting t hose f rom m ilefortlet 5 ) l ater t han t he s econd c entury f rom t he m ilefortlets . I t s eems s lim e vidence o n w hich t o s uggest a s ystem o f p atrolling t he c oast o r a n a ttempt t o i mitate t he a rrangements k nown o n t he Y orkshire c oast i n t he l ate f ourth c entury ( Daniels 1 978A , 3 6; P otter 1 979B, 2 5). T wo s ites h ave b een d iscovered f rom t he a ir l ying e ither s ide o f t he R om a n r oad f rom O ld P enrith t o C arlisle , a l ittle t o t he n orth o f L ow H esket. B arrack F ell was d iscovered a nd p artly e xcavated i n 1 930 . I t l ay 9 1 .5m a bove s ea l evel o n a n arrow s helf o f f airly l evel g round o n t he s ide o f B arrack F ell a bove t he R oman r oad . T here a re g ood v iews t o t he n orth, s outh a nd west a cross a nd a long t he P etteril v alley . T he s ite c onsisted o f a s quare , s tone e nclosure w ith r ounded a ngles, t he e ntrance b eing o n t he w est s ide t owards t he r oad . I t w as s urrounded b y t wo d itches 6 .71 - 7 .32m a part ( Fig 1 4 .2). Ab erm o f 0 .91 - 2 .13m s eparated t he i nner d itch f rom t he s tone wall 2 .13m t hick, f aced i n l arge , s quare s tones w ith a r ubble c ore s et i n m ortar o n a c lay-and-cobble f oundation . T here was n o a ssociated e arth b ank . F arrar s uggests t hat t here m ay b e t wo p hases i n t he d efences; t he s quare p lan o f t he d itches c ontrasts w ith t he o blong w alled e nclosure ( Farrar 1 980 , 2 13 ) . N o s tructures o r f loor l evels w ere f ound w ithin t he e nclosure a nd t he n earer t o t he c entre o f t he e nclosure , t he l ess s tones w ere f ound . T he e xcavator n oted a n a bsence o f r oofing s lates
9 9
a nd n ails
( Collingwood
1 931A ) .
I n t he e xcavations
t he s ite p roduced
m ainly H untcliff ware . F urther s herds e xposed b y p loughing i n M ay 1 978 were a gain m ainly o f H untcliff ware . T here i s n o i ndication i n t he r eport a s t o whether a ny H untcliff t ype was f ound . T he s herds f ound i n 1 978 were t hought b y Mr . J . P . G illam t o b e o f s lightly e arlier d ate t han t he A D 3 67 s uggested b y t he e xcavator f or t he s ite's c onstruction .
T hese
s herds
w ere
q uite
f ine
f or H untcliff w are ,
o ne r im h ad n o i nternal g roove . O ne f ragment o f c astor w are a re s urvivals i n t his c ontext . T he o ther s ite a t Wreay, t renched i n 1 951. with r ounded a ngles
1
o f
s amian a nd
t he
a s herd
mile t o t he n orth o f B arrack F ell,
was
A s quare e nclosure was d elimited b y t wo d itches 6 .1m a part, b etween which were t he r emains o f a n
u pcast m ound ( Fig 1 4 .3). N o e ntrance n or a ny t race o f ad efensive wall were f ound , t hough o n t he l ip o f t he o uter d itch o n t he west s ide were b roken s andstone a nd c obbles ( Bellhouse 1 953 ) . B oth s ites h ave b een i dentified a s R oman s ignal s tations with p resumed s imilar e nclosures t o t hese h ave r ecently b een e xcavated .
a nd c ompared
t he e ast o f t he P ennines . Two o f A t H artburn , c lose t o t he R oman
r oad k nown a s D evil's C auseway , J obey f ound a d ouble-ditched e nclosure o f s ub-rectangular p lan , n ot d issimilar t o t hose a t B arrack F ell a nd Wreay, t hough i t i s m ore i rregular . Within were f ound a n umber o f r ound t imber houses o f n ormal n ative t ype . whatsoever
f or
T here was n o e vidence
a R oman m ilitary p resence o n
t he s ite
( Jobey G .
1 973 ) .
A t A pperley D ene t he s ite o f a n ative f armstead was r eoccupied a fter an a bandonment o f c irca 1 00 y ears i n t he m id-fourth c entury . T he e xcavator t hought t hat i n t his s econd p hase t he s ite h ad a gain b een a n ative s ettlement, b ut h e d oes n ot r ule o ut t he p ossibility t hat i t may h ave h ad a m ilitary f unction .
T he s ite was n ot o ccupied a fter A D
3 67 . T he e xcavator c ompared t he s ite i n i ts f ourth-century p hase with Wreay a nd B arrack F ell a nd h e p ointed o ut t hat t he a rea within t he d itches a t a ll t hree s ites i s v ery s imilar a nd s uggests t hat t hey a ll m ay b e n ative s ites ( Greene 1 978) . P rofessor G . J obey i s i nclined t o a ccept b oth W reay a nd B arrack F ell a s R oman military s tructures. T he u se o f mortar i n t he wall a t B arrack F ell w ould b e m ost u nusual i n a n ative c ontext, a s w ould t he p resence
o f window
g lass which was
f ound t here .
H e p oints
o ut
t hat
r ectilinear n ative s ettlements a re n ot a f eature o f t he a rea t o t he west o f t he P ennines, a lthough t hey a re c ommon t o t he e ast a nd n orth e ast . N o o ther p osts o f t his d ate a nd t ype h ave b een f ound a long t he r oad b etween O ld P enrith a nd C arlisle . C ollingwood h ad s uggested a s eries H ill .
o f t hree p osts - o n T heifside H ill , B arrack F ell a nd C arleton T he a bsence o f a ny c entral t ower o r p latform t o a id s ignalling
a t b oth Wreay .
s ites i s n oteworty, a s i s t he a bsence o f a s tone wall a t L ittle e xcavation h as b een u ndertaken a t e ither s ite .
A s omewhat s imilar s ite h as b een n oted a t S toke H ill i n D evon . T his d ouble-ditched s ub-rectangular e nclosure was d ated b y t he e xcavators t o t he l ate t hird c entury. c olour-coated ware c ame f rom small.
Again,
no
t race
o f
A c oin o f C arausius a nd a s herd o f t he s ite . T he o ther s herds were v ery a c entral
t ower
was
found.
T he
e xcavator's s uggestion t hat t he s ignal s tation was d esigned t o g ive warning o f s ea r aids c annot b e t aken s eriously s ince i t l ies s everal m iles f rom t he s ea ( Fox , A . a nd R avenhill 1 959) . E xcavations i n 1 971 f ound n o t race o f o ccupation b etween t he i nner a nd o uter d itches . A
1 00
t rench a cross t he o uter b ank s howed t hat t he o uter f ace w as r evetted i n s tone ( Milnes 1 972). Immediately within t he i nner d itch was a c lay r ampart c irca 4 .57m wide . T he c auseway a cross t he i nner d itch w as l ightly m etalled . T he p resence o f a r ampart immediately w ithin t he o uter d itch w ould b e u nusual i n a R oman m ilitary s tructure a nd i t m ay w ell b e o f p rehistoric d ate ( Bidwell 1 980, 4 4). O n
t he
c oin
e vidence,
P hilp
h as
s uggested
t hat
t he
g arrison
o f
R eculver was w ithdrawn c irca A D 3 60 ( Philp 1 969A ) . T he c oin e vidence f rom L ympne p rovides n o e vidence f or t he f ort's h aving b een o ccupied b y r egular t roops a fter A D 3 48 . R eece r emarks t hat t here was e ither a g arrison w hich was n ot ( unusual) b eing p aid ( irregular t roops?) o r t here was n o g arrison i n r esidence . L ikewise , t he p ottery e vidence s uggests t hat t he f ort was a bandoned b y c irca A D 3 50 ( Cunliffe 1 980 , 2 63, 2 81). A t P ortcheste/ t hroughout m uch o f t he f irst h alf o f t he f ourth c entury t here were p eriods d uring which r ubbish was d umped a t t he b ack o f t he f ort wall . S uch a r ubbish l ayer a ccumulated i n t he p eriod c irca A D 3 00-25 when i t was s ealed b y a d eposit o f f reshly-quarried b rick e arth.
T his
r epresents
a t idying
u p
o f
t he
s ite .
P robably
c ontemporary with t his was t he d emolition o f a t l east o ne t imber b uilding; p it 1 03 was l argely f illed with d emolition d ebris . I n t he p eriod AD 3 25-45 t here was f urther i ntense a ctivity . Only o ne s tructure c an b e d ated t o t his p hase - t he s o-called g uard h ouse , R 6, w hich f ronted o n t he n orth-south s treet b y t he s outh g ate . I t was a r ectangular p ost-built s tructure 4 x 3 .4m ( Fig 4 9 .4D). S ix p osts w ere r ecorded , e ach a veraging 2 0-31cm i n d iameter a nd 3 1-46cm d eep . I t m ay h ave s erved t o c ontrol p assage t hrough t he g ate . T he b ulk o f t he c esspits f ound o n t he s ite d ate t o t his t ime a nd f ive c ontemporary wells a lso d ate t o t his p eriod . E arly i n t he A D 3 40s, t he r ubbish w hich h ad a ccumulated i n t he p revious t wo d ecades was a gain s ealed a nd t he major r oads were r e-metalled a nd p rovided with t imber g utters. Most o f t he wells a nd c esspits were f illed b y t his t ime a nd
l arge
e xpanses o f c obbles were s pread o ver t he western h alf o f t he e xcavated a rea . B uildings R 4 a nd R 5 w ere c onstructed a t t his p eriod . R 4 was o f s ill b eam c onstruction a nd e nclosed 6 x 5 .5m ( Fig . 4 9 .4B) . A cross t he f ront r an a c orridor o r v eranda 1 .5m wide . T he r oom b ehind may h ave b een d ivided i nto t wo . A V -shaped g ulley, p robably c ontemporary with t he b uilding,
r an r ound o ne c orner o f i t.
T he a rea p ossibly
o ccupied b y b uilding R 5, o f s imilar s ize t o R 4, was v ery d isturbed b y p ost-Roman f eatures; o nly a s ingle s ill b eam w as f ound . T he s carcity o f c oins i n t he p eriod A D 3 45-64 p robably r epresents a p eriod o f o rdered o ccupation r ather t han a l ack o f
a ctivity .
F or t he
f ourteen
y ears f ollowing A D 3 64 t here was a gain i ntensive o ccupation which c ontinued , t hough p erhaps o n a r educed s cale , a fter A D 3 78 ( Cunliffe 1 975, A t
4 25).
s ome
t ime
d uring
t he e arlier f ourth c entury t he s outh g ate o f
R isingham was n arrowed l eaving a p assageway o nly a l ittle o ver 6 1cm w ide . R ichmond t hought t hat t his p robably p ost-dated t he C onstantian r econstruction o f t he e astern g ate-tower . B ehind t he west wall a b uilding c ontemporary with t he work i n t he s outh g ate was s et c lose u p b ehind t he wall o ver t he l evelled r ampart b ank .
T he f loors were
p artly o f e arth a nd p artly f lagged . A l ittle p ottery a nd a m uch w orn c oin o f G allienus c ame f rom t he b uilding ( Richmond 1 936) . H adrian 's Wall
b y
B irdoswald
was
p resumably
1 01
r ebuilt
i n
t he
e arlier
f ourth
c entury .
T he p resence o f
e arly f ourth-century p ottery s ealed within
t he wall s tructure d oes n ot n ecessarily d ate t he W all's t he T heodosian r econstruction ( cf D aniels 1 978A , 1 99) . B etween A D
3 05
a nd
3 67
t he
r ebuilt
n orth-east
g ate
r ebuilding t o
( period
5 )
o f
Malton r equired m odification o wing t o p artial d estruction ; t he i nner a rch o f t he g ate c annot h ave b een s tanding . Two s tone p acked p osth oles were c ut t hrough t he p eriod 5 r oad, p resumably t o s upport t he r oof o ver t he p ortal ( cf. t he n orth g ate o f S outh S hields c irca A D 2 30) t hough t he e xcavator t hought t hat t he t wo p osts h ad f ormed a t urf- a nd-timber b arrier b uilt a cross
t he s outhern p art o f t he g ate i n
i ts l ast p hase . H e s uggested t hat t he f ront a rch a nd f ort w all were p robably i n r uins a t t his t ime . C ontemporary w ith t his w ork , a t t he g ateway, a r ectangular b uilding was c onstructed , p artly o verlying t he path o nto t he r ampart t o t he west o f t he s outh g uardroom . Much o f t he r ampart was r emoved b y t he c onstruction o f a nother b uilding a butting o n t he s outh w all o f t he g uardchamber . A n a ttempt w as m ade t o p oorly f ace t he u nfaced wall o f t his c hamber which h ad h itherto b een masked b y t he r ampart. A l arge c ornice b lock i n t he f loor o f t his b uilding p resumably c ame f rom t he s uperstructure o f t he g ate . I n t he west p ortal o f t he s outh g ate o f B urrow-in-Lonsdale, a small s quare s tructure was
i nserted
( Fig
1 8 .2) .
I t w as b uilt o n t op o f
t he
road metalling which f ormed i ts f loor a nd was o f v ery poor c onstruction . T he e ast a nd s outh walls w ere b uilt o f r oughly-squared s tones whilst t he n orth a nd west walls were o f c obble s tones built neatly i n herringbone f ashion . I n t he m iddle o f t he g ateway, n ow n arrowed t o 3 .2m , was a r oughly-constructed d oorstep o f f our s quared s tones a nd a l arge l ump o f r e-used c oncrete ( Hildyard 1 954 , 7 1) . A s n o p ottery o f
l ater t han c irca A D
t he g ate p robably
3 60 was
f ound ,
t hese a lterations
t o
d ate t o t he e arlier f ourth c entury .
A s will b e n oted f rom t he a bove i nformation ,
t here i s v ery l ittle t hat
c an b e c losely d ated i n t he f irst s ixty y ears o f t he f ourth c entury . Wheeler's c omment t o r ecommend i t:
o n t he d ating o f C aernarvon's
r eoccupation h as
m uch
" It would b e r ash t o a ssociate t hese w orks w ith a ny o ne o f t he k nown n ames o r c ampaigns o f t he p eriod . T he n ame o f T heodosius, f or example, s uggests i tself, b ut i t will b e wiser merely t o r efer t he l ast p hase a t S egontium g enerally t o t he s pasmodic m ilitary r evival o f t he l atter h alf o f t he c entury w hen t he e arlier c oastal d efences were e xtended n orthwards a gainst t he i nvaders w ho w ere p ressing m ore a nd m ore
o n t he f lanks
o f
t he n orthern f rontier"
( Wheeler
1 922 ,
3 10 ) .
T he r ebuilding o f m ilefortlet 5 p resumably r epresents a r eaction t o t he s ame p ressure , a s d oes t he r ebuilding a t L ancaster , t hough w hether we s hould s ee t he n ew f ort a t L ancaster a s r esembling t hose o n t he S axon S hore b oth s tructurally a nd f unctionally i s l ess c lear . C ollingwood t hought t hat t he s ite " which m ight a t a p inch s erve a s a s eaport, would hardly b e d esigned b y a ny s ane m an a s an aval base" ( Petch J . 1 959). T he s uggested a bandonment o f L ympne i n t he p eriod AD 3 40-50 a nd o f R eculver c irca A D 3 60 i s s urprising .
I n A D 3 64 o r
3 65, Ammianus r ecords t hat " the P icts, S axons, S cots a nd A ttacotti were h arassing t he B ritons with c onstant d isasters" ( A .M . M I, 4 ,5) . I n t he n orth t he f orts a t B rough-on-Noe, L anchester a nd Whitley C astle, which s how e vidence f or o ccupation i n t he e arlier f ourth
1 02
c entury, would s eem t o h ave b een a bandoned b y t he m iddle o f t he c entury . T he s table i n t he p raetentura a t B rough was t hought t o h ave b een s ystematically d emolished b y t he w ithdrawing g arrison ( Jones G a nd Wild 1 968). T he l atest c oin f rom t he s ite, f ound a bove t he c ollapsed s tonework o f t he p eriod III prAetorium, i s o f M agnentius ( Jones G a nd Wild 1 969A); t he l atest c oin f rom L anchester i s o f J ulian ( Steer 1 938 ) . A t W atercrook , a lthough t here i s n o s tructural e vidence f or f ourth-century o ccupation , c oins a nd p ottery which i nclude o ne p iece o f C rambeck t ype l b a nd a c oin o f G ratian, may i ndicate c ontinued o ccupation o f t he s ite. O n
t he n orthern f rontier,
t he p resence o f a reani i s
m entioned b y
Ammianus i n t he t ime o f C onstans w ho d escribes t heir f unction t hus : " It was t heir d uty t o h asten a bout h ither a nd t hither o ver t he l ong s paces t o g ive i nformation t o o ur g enerals o f t he c lashes o f r ebellion a mong n eighbouring p eoples" ( A .M . X XVIII , 3 ,1) I t i s n ot c lear e xactly w ho t hese p eople were . R ichmond n oted t hat a reani i s u sually a mended t o a rcani , s ecret a gents, y et h e s uggested t hat Ammianus' d escription o f t heir w ork a s o pen f rontier p atrolling would f it i n with t he f unction we e nvisage a s h aving b een e arlier c arried o ut b y t he e xploratores . H e s uggested t hat t he n ame a reani m ight b e d erived f rom a reae , s heep f olds, a nd t hat t hey m ay h ave l ived i n n ative-style f armsteads ( Richmond 1 958B, 1 15) . B arn i J ones h as r ecently a rgued t hat t he a rcani, a s h e c alls t hem, f ormed t he g arrisons o f t he f orts o n t he W all i tself a nd h e c ites H ousesteads a s a n e xample , c alling i t a n o utpost f ort . H e s uggests t hat t o t he " part T eutonic, b arely l iterate g arrison ( to j udge f rom a s urviving i nscription) E presumably o f t hird-century d ate ] t he i mperial f acade m eant l ittle , p erhaps n ever e xisted ; t he p ropinquity o f l ike-minded n atives c laiming a utonomy a nd p romising b ooty m eant f ar m ore" ( Jones G . 1 979, 6 7). I f ind t his i nterpretation d ifficult t o a ccept. A mmianus s pecifically s tates t hat T heodosius r emoved t he a reani f rom t heir p osts b ut t here i s n o e vidence t hat t he s tyle o f g arrison w ithin t he W all f orts c hanged i n t he l ater f ourth c entury . T he a bandonment o f t he o utpost f orts a t B ewcastle a nd R isingham ( and p ossibly a lso N etherby) c irca A D 3 67 i s m ore l ikely t o r eflect t he r emoval o f t he a reani f rom t hese f orts. I f C onstans d id o rganise t he a reani, p erhaps w hen h e v isited B ritain i n A D 3 42-3 , h e m ay h ave p laced t hem i n t he r eoccupied f orts o f B ewcastle a nd R isingham . T he e astern s ector o f t he Wall would h ave b een s eriously weakened b y t he a bandonment o f R isingham a nd H igh R ochester i n A D 3 12 i f t his i n f act d id t ake p lace . H altonchesters, c lose b y D ere S treet a nd R udchester , w ere a lso p robably u noccupied a t t his t ime . Q uite what G .D.B. Jones m eant b y c alling H ousesteads a n o utpost i s u nclear . A lthough a n umber o f f orts o n t he W all w ere u noccupied i n t he e arlier f ourth c entury , t here i s l ittle e vidence t o s uggest t hat i t d id n ot t hen a ct a s a l inear b arrier . T he W all b y t he n orth-west a ngle o f B irdoswald c ould h ave b een r ebuilt a s e arly a s t he t ime o f C onstantius C hlorus . A lthough t he W all b y S ewingshields w as i n t otal d isrepair i n t he e arlier f ourth c entury, t he t opography o f t he a rea w ould s till h ave p rovided a n e ffective b arrier w ithout t he p resence o f t he W all u pon t he c rags .
1 03
C HAPTER 7
B y
t he
A D 3 67,
T HE B ARBARICA C ONSPIRATIO A ND C OUNT T HEODOSIUS
middle
o f
t he
f ourth
c entury,
B ritain was
u nder
f requent
b arbarian a ttack . T he v isit o f C onstans t o t he d iocese i n t he w inter o f A D 3 42-3 would s uggest a s erious s ituation , t hough whether t his was t he r esult o f b arbarian i nvasion i s n ot k nown . I t i s p ossible t hat h is v isit w as l inked i n s ome way w ith t he a reani who o perated n orth o f H adrian's Wall ( A .M . X XVIII , 3 .8) . A t t his t ime t he C hannel c rossing was d escribed a s " hazardous d ue t o t he p resence o f b arbarians" ( Julius F imicus Maternus, D e E rrore P rofanarum R eligionum X XXVIII ,
6 ) .
I n A D
3 60 , t he P icts a nd S cots w ere c ausing d amage , p resumably n orth o f t he Wall . Mann s uggests t hat t hese ' loca l imitibus v icina' o f Ammianus a re t he l oca m entioned i n t he R avenna C osmography . T hese a re t hought t o h ave b een r ecognised m eeting p laces f or t he c lient s tates n orth o f t he
W all
( Mann
1 979B,
1 81) .
I f
t his s uggestion i s
c orrect,
a fter A D
3 60 t he R omans may h ave l ost s ome c ontrol o ver t he a rea n orth o f W all which p reviously p erhaps e xtended a s f ar n orth a s t he T ay .
t he
I t i s u nlikely t hat t he c essation o f s upply o f b lack b urnished ware p ottery, c ategory I , t o t he n orth was a r esult o f t he d isruption o f t he western s ea l anes c irca A D 3 60 o r A D 3 67 ( Webster P . 1 979, 1 8). C ompetition f rom t he E ast Y orkshire i ndustries, e specially H untcliff ware, may have b een t he main factor although t echnically r etrograde , H untcliff w are was p robably c heaper t o p roduce a nd w ould c ertainly b e c heaper t o market i n t he n orth ( Gillam 1 976B, 5 9). B y c irca A D 3 65 t he e nemies o f B ritain a re r ecorded a s t he P icts, S cots, A ttacotti a nd S axons. A t s ome t ime i n t he mid-fourth c entury, Gratian, f ather o f Va l ent ini an I , had been a ppointed c omes B ritanniarum , t hough F rere t hinks t hat t his was a s pecial a ppointment n ecessitated b y t rouble within t he d iocese o n t he d eath o f C onstantine I I a ny
a nd
t hat
G ratian
was
i mpending r ebellion
s ent
with
( Martin
c omitatensian
f orces
t o
f orestall
1 969 ) .
T hese t roubles c ulminated i n t he b arbarica c onspiratio o f A D
3 67,
p robably t he b iggest n on-event , a rchaeologically, i n t he 3 60 y ears o f R oman r ule i n B ritain . T his i nvasion i s d escribed i n s ome d etail b y A mmianus: Britain
was
brought
i nto
a s tate
o f
extreme
need
b y
a
c onspiracy o f t he s avages t hat N ectaridus, t he c omes m aritimi t ractus h ad b een k illed a nd t he d ux F ullofaudes h ad b een ambushed b y t he e nemy a nd t aken p risoner A t t hat t ime t he P icts, d ivided i nto t wo t ribes c alled D icalydones a nd V erturiones, a s well a s t he A ttacotti , a
1 04
warlike r ace o f m en, a nd t he S cotti were r anging widely a nd c ausing g reat d evastation, while t he G allic r egions, wherever a nyone c ould b reak i n b y l and o r s ea, were h arassed b y t he F ranks a nd t heir n eighbours
t he S axons.-." ( A .M. XXVII,
T he s eriousness s cholars:
o f
t he
s ituation h as
8 ,1).
b een well a ppreciated b y
m odern
" And i n 3 67 a g igantic i nvasion o f P icts a nd S cots swamped a ll t he d efences o f t he n orth a nd west a nd p assed l ike a f lood o ver t he c ivilised a nd p rosperous d istrict o f E ngland . T he i nvaders were d estructive b arbarians a nd n othing s urvived t heir a ttack e xcept t he s trongest f ortified t owns...." ( Collingwood 1 924, 3 8). " The wall a nd t he f orts o f t he n orth a gain f ell 6 2).
" ( Richmond 1 955,
" The m ain f ury s eems t o h ave f allen u pon t he n orthern f rontier a nd t he western c oastlands H adrian's Wall h ad a lways b een impregnable w hen i ts g arrison was t here: n ow i t was o verrun o r t aken i n t he r ear . T he g ravity o f t he s ituation was g reatly e nhanced b y t he l ength o f t ime i t t ook t o r estore o rder, a lmost t wo y ears p assed b efore t he g overnment r egained c ontrol" ( Frere 1 967 , 3 50-1) . T he g reat p roblem with t hese a ccounts o f t he r aids i n A D 3 67 i s t hat a rchaeologically t here i s n o e vidence f or s uch r aids h aving o ccurred . Morris n oted t he d iscrepancy b etween t he l iterary a nd a rchaeological e vidence i n p art " The i nvasion o f 3 67 s eems a p roblem: t he c onsiderable s pace t hat Ammianus a llots i t would s eem t o a rgue a n e xceptionally h eavy b low t hat s hould h ave s hown c lear a rchaeological t races
—there i s v ery
l ittle e vidence o f a ny widespread d estruction i n l owland B ritain i n t he 3 60s. O ne o r t wo c ountry h ouses s eem t o h ave b een a bandoned a t a bout t his t ime b ut h undreds r emained i ntact . was m uch m ore s erious" ( Morris J . 1 973 , 1 5-16) . I t h as
g enerally b een a ssumed t hat
t he p rovinces
T he
o f
n orthern
a ssault
B ritain were n ot
t otally r ecovered u ntil AD 3 69 . O n h earing o f t he r aids i n B ritain i n A D 3 67 V alentinian , t hen i n n orthern G aul , h ad d espatched S everus t he c omes d omesticorum t o B ritain . H e was s oon r ecalled a nd J ovinus, t he' magister e quitum was s ent i nstead . A fter b oth h ad r eported t he n eed f or r einforcements, w ith t he r ank o f c omes . m ovements i n t he s ummer
T heodosius was s ent w ith a small f ield a rmy T omlin , i n a r eassessment o f V alentinian 's o f A D 3 67 , h as s uggested t hat T heodosius m ay
have b een s ent t o B ritain i n A D 3 67, n ot i n A D 3 68 a s t hought, a nd h ave r eached L ondon ; h ence Ammianus' p hrase , h ad b een s aved s ooner t han c ould h ave b een h oped".
has b een " The t own
B y t he e nd o f A D 3 68 , T heodosius h ad c leared t he p rovince o f
t he e nemy
a nd p ut d own a u surper .
H is
t otal f orce o f f our a uxilia EAlatina
p erhaps d id n ot n umber m ore t han 2 ,000 m en ( Tomlin 1 974A ) . Ammianus, t he m ain s ource f or t he e vents i n B ritain o f A D 3 67, was writing u nder T heodosius
I ,
t he s on o f
C ount T heodosius .
H e
i s
n ot
l ikely
t o h ave
m inimised t he emperor's f ather's a chievements . T he c risis o f A D 3 60 , which r equired t he s ending o f a f orce o f i dentical s ize u nder L upercinus, was d ismissed i n a c ouple o f l ines " for i ts c ommander h ad
1 05
l ess i llustrious c hildren" ( Morris J . 1 973, 1 6). Mr . P .J . C asey s uggests t hat t he m ain r eason f or d espatching L upercinus t o B ritain i n A D 3 60 was t o r emove h im f rom G aul a t a c ritical s tage i n J ulian's r ise t o p ower . T here h as
b een m uch d iscussion a s
t o w hat a rea N ectaridus ,
t he c omes
m aritimi t ractus h eld c ommand o ver . M ost s cholars w ould e quate t his c ommand with t hat o f t he c omes l itoris S axonici r ecorded i n t he N otitia, b ut i t i s d ifficult t o a ccept t he d eath o f a c omes o n t he s outh a nd e ast c oast w hen Ammianus m entions n o.invasion b y S axons o r F ranks . J ohnson i gnores t he s tatement o f Ammianus t hat t he S axons a nd F ranks w ere a ttacking t he G allicanos t ractus a nd m aintains t hat s outh-east B ritain was e vidently u nder a ttack ( Johnson J . 1 976C , 8 9) . C asey h as s uggested t hat t he P icts l aunched a s eaborne a ttack o n t he S axon S hore ( Casey 1 979B, 7 4). T omlin h as warned a gainst a ssuming t hat N ectaridus' c ommand was a nother n ame f or w hat l ater b ecame k nown a s t he L itus S axonicum ( Tomlin 1 973 , 3 3 ; c f . Mann 1 977 , 1 3 ) . I t h as b een s uggestd t hat t he c omes m aritimi t ractus was i n c ommand o f t he w estern l ittoral o f B ritain . A t o nly o ne m ilitary s ite i n t he whole o f B ritain i s t here p ossibly a ny s ign o f d estruction w hich h as r ecently b een t entatively a ssociated with t he r aids o f A D 3 67 . T he a bsence o f d estruction within t he f orts o n H adrian's W all h as b een e xplained b y B reeze a nd D obson t hus: " In A D 3 67 t hey ( the P icts) m ay h ave i gnored H adrian 's W all a nd s imply s ailed r ound i t t his may h ave b een h ow F ullofaudes was c aught i n a t rap. I t would a lso a ccount f or t he l ack o f e vidence f or d estruction o f H adrian's Wall a t t his t ime - i n f act t he Wall was p robably t he s afest p lace i n t he p rovince" ( Breeze a nd D obson 1 976 , 2 21). I f t he s ignal s tations o n t he Yorkshire c oast were b uilt b y T heodosius, t his s uggests t hat t here h ad b een t rouble f rom s ea r aiders , p resumably P icts s o f ar n orth . A r eference , k indly b rought t o m y a ttention b y M iss L . M acInnes, i n t he A nnals o f T igernach ( XVI , 2 35) r ecords t hat i n t he p ost-Roman p eriod t he P icts p ossessed a f leet o f c onsiderable s ize . P otter writes i n t he e xcavation r eport o n R avenglass: " Thus i t i s q uite p ossible t hat R avenglass w as i nvolved i n t he w ars o f t he 3 60s, a nd t hat i t was a ttacked f rom t he s ea . I f s o, we c an p robably d ate t he r ebuilding o f t he f ort i n p hase 4 t o t he T heodosian r estoration o f t he f rontier r egion , a lthough we a dvance t his h ypothesis w ith c onsiderable c aution" ( Potter 1 979A , 4 1) . T he e vidence f or v iolent d estruction c ame f rom t wo a reas w here p atches o f b urnt d aub were f ound t o o verlie t he l atest b uildings o f p hase 3 . T he excavator s uggested t hat a small g roup o f c oins r epresenting a small h oard " is a lso a c lear i ndication o f t he t roubles o f t he p eriod" . T he h oard p rovided a t erminus p ost q uer n o f c irca A D 3 50 f or t he e nd o f p hase 3 . T he p ottery e vidence would a llow a d ate i n t he A D 3 60s f or t he e nd o f t hat p hase . P erhaps, i n a ny e vent, we would e xpect t o f ind l ittle e vidence f or e nemy d estruction i n f orts, e specially i f t he e nemy was a ble t o b yp ass t he h igh c oncentration o f t roops o n H adrian 's W all . N or n eed w e l ook i n t he w alled t owns f or e vidence o f t he e nemy's p assing - i t i s
1 06
well known t hat b arbarians d id n ot n ormally a ttack well-fortified p laces. F ritigernus, l eader o f t he Goths i n A D 3 76, r eminded h is p eople
" that h e k ept
p eace with walls" ( A .M .
XXXI,
6 ,
4 ) .
I f we l ook
f or evidence o f t he r aids i n A D 3 67 i n t he villas we a re f aced with t he p roblem o f
i nterpretation .
r aiding p arty n eed
t o
b e
T o what
r eflected
e xtent
i n
t he
d oes
t he p assage o f
a rchaeological
a
r ecord?
Webster s uggested t hat r aiders o perating i n small b ands would o nly s teal t he v aluable o bjects a nd would l eave l ittle a rchaeological t race o f t heir p resence; t hey would n ot n ecessarily have s et b uildings a light.
Only when l arger b odies r oamed t he c ountry a t will would
t here have b een a n e lement o f wanton d estruction f or i ts own s ake ( Webster ,
G .
a v illa,
t he
1 969 ,
2 22) .
a ttackers
p robably t ook what
owner
I f
would
a s izeable n o
d oubt
t hey
g roup
f lee;
c ould
o f
a ttackers
i n
many
c arry
a nd
a pproached
i nstances
went
o n
t heir
t he way;
t here i s n o g ood r eason why t he o ccupants s hould n ot h ave r eturned a nd t aken u p r esidence a gain A t
s ome v illas,
n otably
a t
P ark
c ollapsed. o f
( Branigan
h owever, S treet
1 977 ,
d estruction
where
t he
9 4) i n AD
c ellar
3 67 has
had
b een
T here was a lso burning i n Room V .
t he c ellar,
b een c laimed, burnt
o ut
a nd
I n t he b urnt d ebris
t he l atest c oins were probably o f c irca AD 3 60 o r a
l ittle l ater;
i n t he b uilding d ebris a bove were t wo m ore c oins o f t he
s ame p eriod .
T he e xcavators
s uggested
t hat
t he
d estruction
o ccurred
e ither b efore A D 3 64 o r v ery s oon a fter : " When i t
i s
r ecollected t hat t he barbarian r aids
overwhelming d isaster t o t he p rovince i n AD i rresistibly t o t he c onclusion t hat t imes
o f
t hese
t roubles"
( O 'Neil
t he v illa was 1 971,
c ulminated
3 67 o r 3 68,
i n an
o ne i s l ed
d estroyed d uring t he
3 0) .
T he e xcavator t hought t hat t he a bsence r ather t han t he p 7esence o f c oins o f V alens a nd V alentinian i n t he d estruction d eposits s hould i ndicate d estruction i n A D 3 67-8 . s ite n eeds
None o f
t he c oins f ound o n t he
t o d ate l ater t han Magnentius.
I t i s n ow known t hat a
n umber o f villas i n t he S t. A lban's a rea went o ut o f u se i n t he midf ourth
c entury;
t his
i s
o ften a ssociated w ith
t he
t roubles
r esulting
f rom t he d efeat o f Magnentius i n AD 3 53 by t he l egitimate emperor, C onstantius I I.
N eal s uggests t hat t he a bandonment o f t hese s ites
m ay s imply r epresent a c hange i n l and m anagement which a ppears t o h ave o ccurred a t B oxmoor a nd G orhambury ( Neal 1 978, 5 2). T he v illa e states d o s eem t o h ave r emained , t hough Mr . D .S . N eal s uggests t hat t he a rea r ound V erulamium may have been c onverted i nto a n imperial e state a fter
t he d efeat
o f
Magnentius .
B ranigan h as made a c ase f or e nemy d estruction i n t he s outh west i n A D 3 67 .
H e s uggests t hat
p enetrated u p
r aiders
- p resumably
t he
t he B ristol C hannel a nd t hen u p
S cots
f rom
I reland -
t he B ristol Avon and
P arrett r ight i nto t he two t hickest c oncentrations o f villas i n t he r egion . A von a t
H e s uggests t hat t here i s e vidence f or d estruction a long t he K ings Weston , B rislington a nd K eynsham , a nd p ossibly f urther
i nland .
A t n o v illa t hat h e m entions
c losely d ated . d irectly
H e i s p repared
e xperienced
i n t he
f urther i nland a nd t hat
t o
c an t he s igns o f
a ccept
t hat
l ower valley o f
t he
r aid
d estruction b e o f A D
3 67 was
t he Avon and p ossibly
t he evidence f rom e lsewhere i s patchy a nd
i nconclusive ( Branigan 1 977 , 9 6) . T he p resence o f h uman r emains d own t he wells a t t he v illas o f N orth Wraxall a nd B rislington would s uggest t he p ossibility o f e nemy a ttack o n t hese s ites,
1 07
b ut
t he d ate o f
t hese
r emains c oins
i s
o f
d ifficult
G ratian
s uggests
t hat
t o a scertain .
A t N orth Wraxall t here were a lso
i n
t he
well
here
t he
d estruction o f
a fter AD 3 67 ( Webster G .
a nd
a rchitectural
1 969, 2 26).
f ragments .
W ebster
t he v illa p robably d ates
t o
I t i s n oteworthy t hat a t many
v illas which one would e xpect t o have b een p articularly e xposed t o e nemy a ttack, t here i s n o evidence f or d estruction . 1 956 C order r emarked: " But i t m ust b e c oncluded t hat r ural e conomy o f B ritain i n g reatly
e xaggerated"
( Corder
A s l ong a go a s
t he l urid t ales o f t he b reakdown o f t he t he s o-called ' Pictish War' has been 1 956 ,
4 2) .
T hat t here was s ome t rouble i n B ritain i n A D 3 67 c annot b e d oubted, b ut l ittle c an be d one t o a certain i t e xtent. c ases
s uggests
t hat
t he
t rouble was
n ot
A rchaeology i n many
s erious
b ut
t he a chaeological
e vidence may h ave s erious l imitations i n d etermining t he p resence o f r aiders i n a n a rea . Whatever d id happen, t here was c ertainly a v igorous r eaction b y t he R oman g overnment. s aid t o h ave c leared
t he
d iocese o f
N ot o nly i s T heodosius
i nvaders,
b ut
h e
i s
a lso
c redited
with " Making
many
d efences ( A.M.
necessary
improvements,
r estoring
t he
c ities
a nd
a nd protecting t he f rontiers b y s entinels a nd o utposts"
XXVIII,
3 ,1).
H e i s a lso s aid t o h ave r ecovered a p rovince which h ad p assed i nto t he e nemy's
h ands,
which
was
h enceforth
c alled V alentia .
A ttempts
h ave
b een made t o l ocate t his p rovince a nd t he main c andidates have b een n orth
o f
t he
Wall
and
i n N orth
k nowing where i t was; f our p rovinces a ppear
i t
Wales.
T here
i s
j ust
n o
way
o f
a s
t he
i s n ot a n e arlier p rovince r e-named ,
o f B ritain i n t he V erona l ist o f
i n t he N otitia t ogether w ith V alentia .
t hat t he p rovince l ay t o t he north o f
c ixca AD 3 13 a gain
I t
i s h ighly u nlikely
t he Wall - t hat a rea h ad n ot
b een u nder d irect R oman c ontrol s ince t he e arly t hird c entury . i s a l ittle Wall:
e vidence
s uggest
t hat T heodosius
T here
c ampaigned b eyond
t he
C laudian r ecords t hat " he p itched h is c amp amid t he s nows o f
C aledonia" m aintained Mann
t o
( Pan .
s uggests
S ecunda .
V II,
2 6);
a p resence
A s
t hat
t here
n orth
t he
o f
n ew
V alentia was
i s
n o
p rovince
o ne
e vidence
t hat
t he R omans
t he Wall .
o f
was
c arved
o ut
o f
B ritannia
t he o nly t wo p rovinces o f B ritain t o
b e g overned b y a c onsular p raeses, h e f urther s uggests t hat t he n ew p rovince
i ncluded York.
T he
t itle
d ux B ritanniarum i ndicates t hat
t he d ux e xercised a uthority over more t han o ne p rovince;
h e
c ould
s till h ave h eld c ommand o ver t he whole o f
t he n orth ( Breeze a nd D obson
1 976,
a long
2 29).
p rovinces
The
o f
t he
p resence
B ritish
a ccept
H ind's
s uggstion
o n
w hole
d iocese
t he
Much
r ebuilding
T heodosius, c redited
a l ot
w ith
t he
t hat
( Hind
work o f
o f
i t
f inal
V alentia
d iocese
i n
t he N otitia
V alentia was
with
t he
maks
i t
a n h onorific
o ther
f our
d ifficult
t itle
t o
b estowed
1 975).
has
b een
a ssigned
p ossibly a bandonment
t o
c orrectly. o f
t he I n
t he o utposts,
t ime t he
o f
C ount
n orth h e
t hough
i s
r ecently
i t h as b een s uggested t hat N etherby m ay h ave r emained o ccupied ( Dobson 1 979, 3 1), d ue n o d oubt t o i ts p ossible p resence i n t he ' item per l ineam valli s ubsection o f t he d ux B ritanniarum c ommand i n t he N otitia . T his s ubsection p robably d ates t o t he t hird c entury a nd h as
1 08
no
r elevance t o t he Wall's o ccupation i n t he l ater f ourth c entury.
N one o f h as
t he C rambeck t ypes
b een
s eems
f ound
i n
t o h ave
o f
p ottery
g enerally
a m ilitary
c ontext
n orth
t erminated
t he
R oman
o f
d ated
t o a fter A D
t he Wall .
s urveillance
o f
3 67
T heodosius
l owland
S cotland .
Ammianus r ecords t hat t he a reani, who had b een b ribed b y t he e nemy, were r emoved f rom t heir p osts . " It i s e vident 3 68 t he s ame
Morris b elieved t hat:
t hat T heodosius a pplied t o t he B ritish f rontier i n 3 67p olicy t hat he c arried t hrough i n A frica i n 3 71,
a ppointing R oman p raefecti g entium a s r ulers ( Morris J . 1 973, 1 8). T here
i s
n o
e vidence
t hat
C ount T heodosius
c ontrol o ver t he t ribes n orth o f With t he a bandonment o f
t he
o f
t he b order b arbarians"
i mposed a ny k ind o f
R oman
Wall .
t he o utposts,
H adrian 's Wall was s trengthened .
I t was possibly a t t his t ime t hat t he c urtain wall b y milecastle 3 5 was
r ebuilt
f rom i ts
f oundations;
a c oin o f
was f ound i n t he c lay b onding o f s herds
o f f ourth-century p ottery were f ound i n a c ontext b elow t he
l evel o f S ix
t he H ouse o f V alentinian
t he Wall's f oundation a nd s everal
t he Wall's
b uilding
f oundation t o
i nscriptions
t he s outh
have
b een
o f
i t .
f ound
o n
b uilding work c arried o ut b y B ritish
c ivitates,
L indiniensium,
o ne o f
a n u nknown
t wo
o f
c ivitas
t he D umnonii,
B ricic
( Breeze
t he
t wo
Wall
o f
r ecording
t he D urotriges
t he C atuvelauni a nd o ne o f
a nd D obson
1 976,
2 25) .
T hese h ave
o ften been a ssociated with Theodosius' r ebuilding p rogramme i n t he n orth o ut
( Stevens
1 940,
1 49;
R ichmond 1 958B,
t hat when t his work was
1 23).
Mann h as p ointed
c arried o ut b y t he s outhern c ivitates t hey
a re l ikely t o have b een u nder t he s ame c ivil a uthority a s t he Wall. B y t he t ime o f C aracalla t hese c ivitates were i n a d ifferent p rovince, t hough B reeze a nd D obson s uggest c ivitates n eed
were
may have
F rere
t hinks
f orts
b een
t hat
( Frere 1 978, T he
i n t he s ame
o rdered
t hese
t hat
d iocese a s b y
t he
i n
t he f ourth
t he Wall a nd
vicarius
i nscriptions
m ay
d ate
c entury
i n t imes
t o
h elp
t o
t he
i n
t hose
o f
t he
t ime o f
g reat n orth.
S everus
1 98).
o f
H altonchesters,
which may have reoccupied.
Rudchester a nd p ossibly O ld P enrith,
b een a bandoned f or t he p receding 1 00 y ears, were One o f t he l ate f ourth-century buildings a t
H altonchesters s ealed a s herd o f
C rambeck p ottery
d atable
t o
a fter A D
3 67 ( Jarrett 1 959 , 1 83) . T he l ate f ourth-century b uildings o n t his s ite which everywhere o verlay a t hick l ayer o f e arth, were o f two t ypes
which
were
m utually
e xclusive
a nd
a lthough
d ated t o Wall p eriods I II a nd I V r espectively, t hey were c ontemporary . o f
n ormal
t ype .
u nüsually
t hese
T he were
a t
i t was
f irst
t hey
were
l ater s hown t hat
T he b uildings u sing a shlar c onstruction were o thers o f
made
s tone
u se
a nd n ot
o f
s leeper
t imber.
b eams,
T he
t hough
l arge s tones
n icknamed ' park r ailing s tones' were l aid e nd t o e nd . I n t heir u pper f ace, s quare d epressions were c ut t o t ake t he u pright t imbers. A number o f t hese s tones d isplayed a nomalous f eatures: o ne wall o f a b uilding i n t he e xtension h ad t he p ost s ockets s paced q uite r egularly, a nd
o thers
unfinished.
n ot
o n
t he
s ame
l ine
p ecked
post s ockets s et v ery c lose t ogether, s ets, ( pers
o ut
l ightly
a nd
c learly
A s imilar wall f ound i n t he l atera praetorii has t he
t hough why a n ew s et o f c omm . Mr . J .P .
a nd evidently t here were two
s ockets e ver n eeded t o b e c ut i s u nclear L ittle o f t he p lan o f t hese b uildings
1 09
was
f ound;
( Birley, A . was
t hey
d o n ot
a ppear
1 969, f ig 4 ).
o verlain b y
t o f all i nto any r ecognisable t ype
T he s ite o f t he t hird-century praetorium
t hem.
A t
Rudchester
o nly o ne p ark
r ailing s tone
s urvived which was s et a bove a l ayer o f e arth a s a t H altonchesters . A t
C hesterholm
i n
t he
1 930s
t he
i s
T heodosian
p ossibly
r econstruction p ostulated
d ated
c orrectly .
e vidence o f p atching a t t his t ime. e xtensively
u sed
i n
a
p atch .
T he
b y
f ort
E .
B irley
wall
s howed
On t he e ast wall f lags h ad b een
O n
t he west
wall,
t he
e rection o f
a
massively r econstructed wall i n ' Theodosian' s tyle o n t he p eriod I I s tone wall h ad h ad b een
c aused
m ade
a nd-cobble 1 936) .
t o
p acking
T he
t he wall
c orrect
o uter
t his
a gainst
c orners
t o b ulge
o utwards .
i t
o f
( Birley
E .,
l east
2 7 .4m i nto
R ichmond
t he
a ttempt
a nd
S tanfield
I t was r epaired a nd a r ough
t he c ore o f which was f ull o f
r oadway o f l arge s labs was
a n
t he n orth g ate-towers h ad a ll s ubsided ,
t hat o n t he n orth west had c ollapsed. b uttress was a dded ,
L ater
b y b uilding a l arge b uttress with c lay-
r e-used a shlars .
A
l aid t hrough t he n orth g ate a nd e xtended a t
f ort .
T he v ia p rincipalis
o f B irdoswald a t
s ame t ime was paved with l arge f lags ( Birley E .
1 931).
t he
I n t he e ast
g ate a b locking wall was b uilt r educing t he c arriageway t o c irca 1 .83m wide; e ast
a t ombstone had b een u sed i n t his b locking . r ampart
o pposite
t he west g ate ,
a b uilding
with H untcliff a nd C rambeck wares was f ound . was f ound b eneath a p artition wall; f rom
t he
c ore o f
t he
e ast
Overlying t he
( fig 2 5 .3A ) a ssociated
A c oin o f Maximus D aia
a c oin o f C onstans,
wall .
T he walls
h ad
A D 3 42-8 c ame
f requent
c ourses
o f
f lags i n t hem;
t he s outh-east c orner was f ormed o f l arge b locks o f
s tone .
r ampart b uilding
A nother
( fig
2 5 .3B)
immediately
t o
t he
o f
t he n orth-west a ngle w as a lso a ttributed t o C ount T heodosius .
I n
t he
p rincipia
r etained
i ts
t here
e arlier
were
p lan
s ome
( fig
modifications
3 6 .2).
b ut
i t
basically
T he veranda a long
principalis was blocked o ff a t b oth e nds
e ast
t he v ia
a nd g iven a r aised f loor
s upported o n dwarf walls. P art o f t he r oom t o t he e ast o f t he c ourtyard e ntrance was d emolished a nd a well was d ug i n t he s outh-east c orner o f t he c ourtyard which was paved p artly i n f lags a nd p artly with a shlars. All but o ne o f t he r ooms r ound t he c ourtyard were provided with r aised f loors. were p laced o n i ts
Within t he b asilica two s tone b ases
l ong a xis, p resumably t o h elp s upport t he r oof;
i t
was g iven a f loor o f r ammed e arth . T he t ribunal was e xtended 6 1cm t o t he n orth a nd was f aced with o rthostats s et i n moulded s lots. T he r ooms f lanking t he a edes were c onverted i nto l iving a ccommodation, b eing
p rovided
with
h ypocaust
heating
a nd
l avatories
t hough
t he
p resumed p resence o f two l atrines i n t he e astern r ange s eems a b it e xcessive.
T he
d emolished .
T he s trongroom i n t he a edes r emained i n u se;
r oom
p rojecting
s outh
f rom
t he
r ear
r ange
was
a C rambeck
wall-sided m ortarium c ame f rom within i t . A f ire h ad f requently b een l it i n t he a edes. T he s torage a ccommodation with r aised f loors within t he b uilding was d ated t o
t he r eign o f
C onstantine
I I
o r
l ater
b y a c oin. A t
B owness-on-Solway
within
t he
c enturies,
f ort
t here
i n
t hough
t he
c onstructed i n
post-holes
were
l ate
p ottery
s omewhere i n t he a rea . was
was
n o
s tructural
t hird
o f
a nd
t his
r ectangular b uilding.
f irst
p eriod
half
f or o ccupation o f
i ndicates
t he
f ourth
o ccupation
I n t he l ate f ourth c entury, a t imber b uilding
t he n orth-east part
s et
e vidence
i n
a s hallow
T he b uilding
1 10
o f t he s ite.
t rench
f orming
two
A n umber o f s ides
o f
a
may h ave b een c irca 5m wide.
T here i s t he p ossibility o f a nother b uilding i n t he a rea w hich m ay o r m ay n ot b e c ontemporary with p hase 4 . I n t he a rea o f t his b uilding w as a n e xtensive s catter o f c lay a nd c harcoal . L ittle l ate f ourthc entury p ottery was f ound . T he e xcavator s uggests t hat e ither t he f ort was h eld b y a v ery small g arrison o r t hat t he n ucleus o f t he f ourth-century o ccupation h as y et
t o b e f ound
( Porter
1 979,
3 30-2) .
A ll o f t he f orts o n H adrian's Wall were p robably o ccupied b y T heodosius, b ut t here i s l ittle e vidence f or t he o ccupation o f m ilecastles a nd t urrets . Milecastle 3 7 y ielded a f ew p ieces o f l ate f ourth-century p ottery ( Blair 1 934 , 1 17) . Milecastle 3 2 i s s aid t o h ave p roduced a t l east o ne s herd o f W all p eriod 4 s tyle p ottery ( Binns 1 971). O ne p iece o f C rambeck p archment-ware, t ype 5 b, c ame f rom milecastle 4 8 . T his t ype p ost d ates A D 3 67, a s c ould s ome o f t he H untcliff t ype c ooking p ots f ound h ere ( Gibson a nd S impson F . 1 911, p l.IV n o .33; p l.V n o.6, 1 3-15). Two p ieces o f C rambeck p ost ' Pict War' t ypes h ave b een p ublished f rom m ilecastle 4 0 , t ype ( Simpson F . 1 976 , p l .VI) . t ype l b ' s o f p ost A D 3 67 d ate . 1 930,
1 63-4
no .
6 0).
p lus s ome H untcliff
M ilecastle 9 h as y ielded t wo C rambeck One p ot had b een r ivetted ( Birley E .
A t milecastle 2 9 aC rambeck t ype 5 b b owl has
b een f ound . T he o ccurrence o f t hese t ypes t hought t o b e f ound o nly i n c ontexts p ost
o f p ottery which a re d ating c irca A D 3 67,
s uggests t he p ossibility o f o ccupation o n t hese s ites, b ut b y n o m eans p roves s uch a n o ccupation . T he b locking o f t he n orth g ate o f milecastle 5 2 was p resumed t o b e o f T heodosian d ate, t hough n o l ate f ourth-century p ottery was f ound o n t he s ite . T he l ate r oad i n t he s outh g ate was a lso p resumed t o b e T heodosian ( Simpson F . a nd R ichmond , 1 935B 2 52, 2 54) . A t m ilecastle 5 4 t he l atest b uilding h ad b een s et a gainst t he west wall . c entury d ate .
O n i ts
T his was t hought t o b e o f t hird-
f lagged f loor were f ound o nly l ate f ourth-
c entury p ottery; t he e xcavators t hought t hat t he t hird a nd e arly f ourth-century f loors h ad b een r emoved when t he l ate f ourth-century f loor was T he
l aid
l atest
1 903A).
( Simpson a nd R ichmond ,
c oin
f rom
a t urret
i s
1 935A , o ne
o f
2 38) . V alens
f rom
4 4b
( Gibson
Two H untcliff t ype r ims were f ound a t P ike H ill, p ossibly
i ndicating o ccupation a fter A D 3 67.
I n t urrets 7 b a nd 5 1b, r ough,
h ut-like b uildings w ere i nserted i nto t he a lready r uined t urrets . N o e vidence t o d ate t hese h uts was f ound . B irley t hought t hat t he o ne a t t urret 7 b was p ost-Roman ( Birley E . 1 930 , 1 48-9) b ut W oodfield , t he e xcavator o f 5 1b, s uggested t hat t hey were b oth o f f ourth-century d ate . A t L ea H ill, t he t urret d oorway h ad b een blocked a nd a n i lld efined a rea s craped o ut o f t he c entre o f t he t urret.
I n t his a rea
was a h earth a nd p ossibly a r ough s tone f lagged f loor . T he h ut h ad r ough s tone walls, p erhaps m ortared , a nd m easured i nternally 1 .98 b y 5 .07m . I t s eems t o have g radually b ecome r uinous ( Woodfield 1 965, 1 75). • Major b uilding w ork h as b een a ssociated with T heodosius a t B irdoswald a nd H ousesteads. T he b uilding n orth o f t he via principalis a t B irdoswald was m odified y et a gain ( fig 5 0 .1B) . I t t hen c onsisted o f a l ong n arrow b uilding o f v ery s imilar p roportions t o t hat o f t he e arly s econd c entury o n which s ite
i t s tood .
T o t he n orth o f
i t was
a small d etached r oom with a r aised f loor a nd a v entilator t hrough t he wall which was l ater b locked b y t he a ddition o f a b uttress t o t he s tructure , b eing r eplaced b y a s played o pening f urther n orth . R eu sed i n t he f loor o f I Vb a s f lagging were t wo i nscriptions, o ne o f
1 11
S everus R IB 1 909, a nd t he o ther o f D iocletian a nd Maximianus R IB 1 912 . T he l atter i nscription had b een s et f ace d own; t he f ace was b adly weathered b ut
t he b ack
was s uggested ,
was
u nworn ,
was a c ookhouse;
a s
was
t he whole f loor .
t he l ower p art
I Va ,
i t
o f a r otary q uern was
s et i nto t he f loor a nd i n t he r oom was much b urnt wattle a nd d aub ( Richmond a nd B irley E . 1 930) . A b uilding a ssociated w ith H untcliff ware o verlay t he C onstantian b uilding o n t he v ia q uintana . I t h ad a h eavy f lagged f loor a nd walls b uilt u pon f lag f ootings . T he b uilding was
o ut
o f
t hought 1 931,
a lignment with
i t had b een
t he r est
l aid o ut
I n t he n orth g uardchamber o f
o f
t he f ort
t he
a nd
a vailable
t he
e xcavator
s pace
( Richmond
t he p orta p rincipalis d extra i n i ts f inal
a f loor o f yellow l ime was
a nd small pieces
e xcavated i n t he
f it
1 28).
p hase, d ust
t o
l ate
1 833,
f ourth
a t
B irdoswald
i s
u ncertain;
( Gillam
l aid o n which l ay a heap o f
c oal.
I n
t he e ast
T he
c onverted
i t
was
6 8).
i nterval-tower
c oal
g ate a t H ousesteads,
t he s outh g uardchamber was u sed a s
c entury .
was
1 950,
o f
n orth
i nto a b allistarium ,
a c oal o f
t hough
s tore
i n
t he
e ast
g ate
a t
what
d ate
d ated b y c onvention a s n o p ottery was f ound
A t
t he
s outh
g ate
t he
e ast
wall
o f
t he
west
g uardchamber was r econstructed, f ollowing c omplete d emolition, i n l arge a nd
i rregular
f ourth-century
masonry,
( Daniels
s aid
t o
b e
1 978A 2 01).
i n
t he
s tyle
o f
t he
l ate
O n t he d efences between t he
p ortae d ecumana and q uintana d extra, t he c ooking s helf a nd r evetted r ampart
were
i ncorporated
i n a n ew b ank whose f ront
was
f ound n ot
t o
b e t he f ort wall but a n ew wall o f which f oundations a nd one c ourse r emained, wall.
p erched h igh o n t he m ound f ormed b y t he c ollapse o f t he f ort
A s t he bank o f mixed e arth was placed s o d irectly u pon t he
c ooking s helf,
t he e xcavators d id n ot c onsider i t t o b e p ost-Roman;
t hey t hought i t g ood evidence f or t he d estruction wrought i n A D 3 67 ( Simpson ,
F .
a nd R ichmond
1 933,
d emolition o f milecastle g ates, was i t
e vidence i s
h ighly
o f
e nemy
milecastle
I t u sed t o b e t hought
d estruction wrought
u nlikely
t he a ctual walls T he
2 61) .
a s s een p articularly a t
t hat
r aiders
o f R oman s ites g ates
a nd
d emolished by t he Romans.
would
i n A D s pend
1 97 . much
t hat t he
m ilecastle 3 7, I n b oth
t ime
c ases
d estroying
when t here was p lunder t o b e had .
t owers
a re
n ow
t hought
t o
have
b een
A t B irdoswald, p resumably t he wall had
c ollapsed t hrough a ge o r was a bout
t o c ollapse .
Immediately n orth o f
t he porta q uintana d extra a s ection o f t he e ast wall, b uilt o f l arge a shlar b locks q uite unlike t he masonry o f t he H adrianic period,
c an
c learly b e s een l eaning well o ut f rom t he wall l ine . A v ery s imilar s ituation i s
s een a t
B recon G aer .
H ere Wheeler
f ound
e vidence f or a g eneral r efortification o f t he n orth, e ast a nd s outh d efences. U pon t he e arlier r ampart f rom 2 .89 t o 4 .27m within t he wall's i nner f ace, was b uilt a massive r evetment l argely o f r e-used s tones;
t he s pace b etween t he r evetment a nd t he wall was p acked with
e arth, r ubble a nd b uilding m aterials . N o m ortar was u sed; t he r ough a nd h asty work, h owever, f ormed w ith t he f ort wall a s ubstantial m ass o f masonry f rom 3 .66 t o 5 .18m wide.
T he s outh g ate was c ompletely
blocked b y t hese n ew d efences. Overlying t he r oad s urface was l ayer o f d ebris, p resumably f rom t he g ate i tself. A bove t his was t ightly-packed s econd 1 .52m
c entury t hick,
f illing o f p ottery .
c arried
I t
r ight
r eddish was
marl
c ontaining
s urmounted b y
a cross
t he
s ite
o f
a d ry t he
s ome f irst s tone
a a
a nd
wall o ver
f ormer
g ateway
f orming a p arapet. T he e ast g ate was s ealed b y a wall o f l oose r ubble c irca 3 .05m wide r evetted b y l arge d ry b uilt b locks o f m asonry
1 12
a nd b oulders
( Wheeler 1 926,
1 1-13).
T he s outh-east a nd n orth-east
a ngle-towers were a lso o verlain b y t hese d efences . A t t he n orth-east a ngle t his w as 4 m w ide . T he e xcavator s uggested t hat t he g reat width was d ue t o t he b uilders' d esire t o u se t he f ront wall o f t he t ower a s a f oundation f or t he m assive b locks o f t he r evetment . T o t his e nd , p art o f t he t ower's s ide walls were d emolished a nd t he f ort wall l owered . A mass o f s tone was u sed t o f ill t he t ower's i nterior ( Casey 1 971). N o d ating e vidence h as b een f ound f or t hese l ate d efences. Wheeler s uggested t hat t hey were o f p ost-Roman d ate . L ittle l ate R oman m aterial h as b een f ound within t he f ort . I f i t i s n ot Roman, t hen who c ould h ave c onstructed i t i s u nclear . C asey t hought t hat i t was c learly m ore t han a t emporary e xpedient . I t p resumably was n ot u sed b y t he N ormans; t heir m otte a nd b ailey c astle l ay a l ittle t o t he s outh-west o f
t he f ort .
A t H ousesteads, Mr . J .Crow h as s uggested t hat t he n orthern d efences e ast o f t he n orth g ate m ay h ave c onsisted o nly o f a r ampart m ound b y t he e nd o f t he R oman p eriod, t he f ort wall h aving c ollapsed . T his w ould h elp t o e xplain t he m assive s ize o f t he l ate r ampart which was o n a n umber o f o ccasions e xtended t o t he s outh d uring t he f ourth c entury . A t o ne p oint, t he r ampart e xtended 8 .4m b ehind t he f ort w all , h ere r educing t he i ntervallum r oad t o 1 .5m wide . B y t he n orth g ate , t he r ampart w as o nly 4 .5m wide . E ach e xtension t o t he r ampart r eceived a n ew r evetment, two o f which b locked t he e ntrance t o t he i nterval-tower ( Daniels 1 980B, 1 0) . T he n orth wall , a s n ow v isible , has been e xtensively r ebuilt b y t he Ministry o f Works. Where t he m odern f ield g ate, h owever, s its o n t he l ine o f t he wall, i t h as n ot b een r ebuilt; t he d iscrepancy b etween t he Ministry's work a nd t he o riginal R oman work c an b e s een . T he o riginal s ection o f w all l eans well o ut
t o t he n orth .
A t b oth B ewcastle a nd T empleborough a t a n e arlier d ate , n ew f ort walls h ad b een c onstructed o n t op o f t he e arlier r ampart b anks. I n b oth c ases t he n ew w alls w ere o f m ore n ormal s tyle o f
c onstruction.
T he n orth-east d efences o f M alton i n t he l ate f ourth v ery u nusual t ype, y et t heir R oman d ate was n ot
c entury w ere o f d oubted b y t he
e xcavator . C order d ated t he ' wall d itch' a nd p eriod 6 i n t he n orthe ast g ate t o t he t ime o f C ount T heodosius. A long t he whole o f t he n orth-east s ide o f t he f ort a d itch was d ug t hrough t he r emains o f t he f ort wall a nd i ts f oundations, t hough t he wall was n ot t otally d emolished ; i n p laces i t s till s tood i n 1 929 , 6 c ourses h igh a nd 6 1cm wide . T he d itch b egan a t t he n orth a ngle , w idened a nd d eepened a s i t a pproached t he g ate a nd b ecame s hallower t owards i ts e nd a t t he e ast a ngle . A t t he g ate , t he d itch w as i nterrupted , l eaving a c auseway; h ere i t was 4 .27m d eep b elow t he g round l evel w ithin t he f ort w hich b y t hat t ime was l evel with t he t op o f t he r ampart. O nly o ne s tonel ined p ost-hole 1 3cm wide c ould have r epresented a s tockade o f t his p eriod o n t he t op o f t he e arly r ampart. A t t he n orth-east g ate t he ' wall i t
d itch' h ad c ut
i nto
t he f ootings
was h ere c irca 2 .89m wide .
o f
I n p eriod
t he 6 ,
p eriod
5 g uardchambers;
a s tructure o f u ncertain
p lan was b uilt o ver t he n orth g uardroom , p robably f orming a r oom 3 .35m wide ( fig 2 1.4B). I t was p oorly b uilt; o ne wall r ested without f oundations o n 3 0cm o f e arth a bove t he p eriod 5 r oadway . T here m ay h ave b een a l ean-to s hed t o t he s outh west . T he s outh g uardroom was r etained a nd r epaired i n p eriod 6 . I n t he b urnt l ayer a ssociated with t his p eriod i n t he s outh g uardroom were s ealed f our c oins: a n
1 13
u ndecipherable t hird-century t ype, C laudius I I, C arausius a nd C onstantine I I, plus two i nfant b urials . T he c orresponding b urnt l ayer o n t he n orth s ide o f t he g ate y ielded c oins o f V ictorinus, C arausius, A llectus a nd a n u ndecipherable f ourth-century t ype . T he r oad t hrough t he p eriod 6 g ate m ay h ave b een f lagged. I t was p ossibly u nder T heodosius t hat t he w est g ate a t H ousesteads w as f inally t otally b locked a nd f illed s olid with a mass o f r ubbish ( Birley E . 1 936 , 1 1), a s was p erhaps t he s ame g ate a t C hesters ( Birley E . 1 959, 1 6). T he s outh g ate o f L anchester was t otally b locked b y r ough walls, p erhaps a t t his t ime , a nd t he e xcavator t hought t hat t he g ate had b een c onverted i nto l iving q uarters ( Steer 1 938). I n t he e ast g ateway a t S outh S hields, H ooppell n oted t hat o ne wall h ad c oloured wall p laster a nd t here was a h ypocaust i n c lose p roximity ( Hooppell 1 878) . A t s ome t ime - p robably i n t he f ourth c entury , b ut p resumably b efore t he g ate was f illed s olid - t he g uardchambers o f t he west g ate a t H ousesteads were c onverted i nto h eated r ooms ( Daniels 1 978A , 1 49 ) . E xcavations i n 1 978 a t C hester-le-Street i ndicated t hat t he s tone d efensive wall , s et o n a p uddled c lay-and-cobble f oundation c irca 3 m wide, was i nserted i nto t he r ampart b ank i n t he f ourth c entury , t hough t he p ottery which p rovided t he d ating e vidence h as n ot y et b een m ore c losely d ated . A s tone g uardchamber o f t he w est g ate was a lso l ocated , t he f loor o f which c onsisted o f m assive s tone b locks a nd a cted a s a f oundation f or t he wall's s uperstructure . B eneath t he f loor was a f ace u rn i n h ard g rey f abric ( Turnbull a nd J ones R . 1 979) . T his wall c ould p ossibly b e a r ebuild o f a n e arlier wall . T he f ort wall o n t he west s ide was o nly
1 .83m t hick
( Gillam a nd T ait
1 968 ,
7 8) .
A t B owes a v ery c rude r epair t o t he b ase o f t he f ort wall was b uilt . T he wall h ad s ubsided i nto a l ayer c ontaining m uch H untcliff w are a nd t he e xcavators s uggested t hat t he r epair was l ate R oman r ather t han N orman a s i t was o nly a ssociated w ith R oman p ottery ( Frere a nd H artley 1 968).
A t
B rougham,
t he
s outh
moat o f
t he N orman c astle may b e
R oman ; when c leared o ut b y t he Ministry o f W orks, i t c ontained m ainly l ate R oman p ottery. B irley s uggested t hat t he wide d itch d ated t o T heodosius ( Birley E . 1 932C, 1 39) . A t t his t ime a small p ost was b uilt a t S caftworth n ear B awtry where t he R oman r oad f rom L incoln t o D oncaster c rossed t he R iver I dle . A n a rea m easuring 6 3 .74m b y 5 6 .42m was e nclosed b y t hree d itches b etween 3 .05m a nd 4 .57m wide ( fig 1 5.1) . A t t he s outhern c orner o f t he d efences, t wo d itches s eem t o d elimit a n a nnex b ounded o n t he o ther s ide p robably b y a marsh . Within t he d efences o nly o ne p ossible p ost-hole
a nd
a n umber
o f
h earths
were f ound .
T races
o f
a t urf
r ampart were f ound i n t he s outhern p art o f t he s ite . T he p ottery c ould a ll i ndicate a d ate i n t he l ater f ourth c entury f or t he s ite's o ccupation . A b ronze c opy o f a s ilver s iliqua o f J ulian was f ound ( Bartlett I n
t he
a nd R iley 1 958 ) .
l ater
f ourth
c entury,
a n umber o f
s ites
s eem t o h ave b een
p rovided o n t he c oast o f B ritain t o s trengthen t he a lready e xisting c oastal d efences .
B urrow Walls
a nd p ossibly L ancaster a nd C aer G ybi
were b uilt o n t he west c oast, B itterne o n t he s outh c oast a nd a t l east f ive s ignal s tations were b uilt o n t he Y orkshire c oast. O n t he n orth-west c oast o f C umbria, t he s ite o f t he s econd-century f ort a t B urrow Walls was r eoccupied . Immediately within t he s tone wall f oundations o f t he e arlier f ort o n t he n orth a nd s outh s ides was a d itch c irca 4 .57m wide . T his d itch was n ot f ound n ear t he e ast
1 14
r ampart . T he e xcavator s uggested t hat t he s econd-century s tone w all m ay h ave b een d emolished w hen t he l ate f ort w as b uilt , t hough i t was b y t hen n o d oubt i n r uins. A f air amount o f l ate f ourth-century p ottery was f ound . T he l ate d itch was v ery r oughly d ug; o n t he n orth s ide i t c ontained g reat q uantities o f s quared b uilding s tones . T he i nner d itch o f t he e arly f ort w as s till a t l east 1 .83m d eep i n t he l ate f ourth c entury ( Bellhouse 1 955) . O f t he m ilefortlets a nd t owers o n t he w estern f lank o f H adrian 's W all , o nly C ardurnock , m ilefortlet 5 , i s k nown t o h ave r emained i n o ccupation i nto t he l ate f ourth c entury. A f ortified e nclosure within t he t own o f H olyhead , A nglesey, h as b een c laimed a s a l ater R oman f ortified l anding p lace o f a t ype s een o n t he R hine a nd D anube f rontiers . T he d ate o f t hese d efences a t C aer G ybi i s u nknown ; n o R oman m aterial h as b een f ound t here ( Livens 1 974 , 3 36) . I t has g enerally b een a ssumed t hat t he d efences d ate t o t he t ime o f V alentinian , i .e . w ere b uilt b y C ount T heodosius o n a nalogy w ith t he p ossibly s imilar s ites o n t he C ontinent, t hough s ome o f t hese f ortified l anding p laces c ould b e much e arlier ( Johnson J . 1 976B). A t C aer G ybi, t he p lan o f t he d efences i s i ncomplete; t hree walls s urvive c ompletely o r i n p art, e nclosing a n a rea o f 0 .32 h a ( fig 1 6 .2) . P rotruding f rom t he n orth-east t ower t owards t he s ea a re t he r emains o f a wall; i t i s t hought t hat f rom t he t wo e astern t owers w alls r an o ut i nto t he s ea , t hough t here i s l ittle e vidence f or t his . T he s traightening o f t he c liff b etween t hese t wo t owers h as r emoved a ny e vidence f or t he p resence o f a wall l inking t hem . W heeler h ad t hought t hat t he s pur wall f rom t he n orth-east t ower a nd t he e astern t owers t hemselves were m edieval r ebuilds ( Wheeler 1 924, 9 9). T he walls s tand t o ah eight o f c irca 3 .66m , w here t here i s a p arapet w alk 1 .06m w ide f ronted b y a p arapet 7 6cm w ide . T hey a re c onstructed , a s a re t he c ontemporary r ound t owers, o f h erringbone m asonry with b onding c ourses o f f lat s tones . O riginally , t he e nclosure w as e ntered o nly f rom t he s outh t hrough t he p resent g ate 4 m w ide . T he n orthern h alf o f t he n orth-west t ower was h ollow ( fig 2 3 .3). A wall a butted a gainst t he n orth wall o f t he t ower a nd r an n orthwards f or 1 .67m , t hen t urned t hrough 9 0° t o r un e ast f or 4 .42m b eyond which i t was b roken o ff b y l ater d isturbance . T his wall, 6 1cm t hick , a lthough n ot s howing a ny h erringbone s tyle o f m asonry, w as s aid b y t he e xcavator t o b e o f s imilar c onstruction t o t he f ort wall - i t u sed t he c harcteristic m ortar w ith p ounded t ile i n i t -a nd h e s uggested t hat t he w all a nd t ower were o f s imilar d ate . T he wall 's f oundation l ay o n -u ndisturbed c lay a t t he s ame l evel a s t hat o f t he t ower. E xcavations b eyond t he n orthern d efences f ound n o e vidence o f t here e ver h aving b een a d itch ( Griffiths 1 954 ) . O n t he S axon S hore i t h as b een s uggested t hat t he f ort o f P ortchester w as r eplaced b y t he f ortified e nclosure a t B itterne ( Frere 1 978 , 3 96 ) . " The u se o f t he d efended s ite o n t he p romontory o f B itterne a t a bout t his t ime m ay b e a d irect r esult o f t he t ransference o f t he g arrison o f P ortchester t o t he n ew s ite" ( Johnson J . 1 976A , 6 2) . C unliffe , i n t he r eport o n e xcavations o f P ortchester , d id n ot b elieve t hat t he s ite h ad b een a bandoned b y t he m ilitary; h e p referred t o s ee B itterne a s a n a ddition t o t he d efences o f t he a rea r ather t han a r eplacement o f P ortchester ( Cunliffe 1 975, 4 30) . T he d efences o f B itterne e nclose a t riangular a rea o n ap romontory f ormed b y ab end o f
1 15
t he R iver I tchen two m iles a bove i ts c onfluence with S outhampton Water . T here a re t wo p hases o f d efences o n t he s ite : a n o uter e arth mound a cross t he p romontory c utting o ff a n a rea o f 1 1 h a , a nd 2 44m t o t he west o f i t a wall e nclosing 2 .6ha ( fig 9 .1; F ox G . 1 902). I n 1 923, when p art o f t he o uter m ound was r emoved , f ive c oins w ere f ound beneath
i t;
two
e xcavated h ere t hese
c oins
s ealed b y o f
t he
s uggested
a rchaeologically
3 68 .
t hat
s terile,
Waterman,
who
t he d ate i ndicated b y t hey t hat,
may h ave a s
a n e arly
s een o ccupation t hroughout
c onstructed
c ertainly h ave
b een
t he m aterial d ate
1 958,
3 4) .
i n
t he
l ate f ourth
f or
i ts
t he R oman p eriod ;
c entury
o r
c ontained s ome R oman m aterial
T he
s quared l imestone b locks, mortar c irca 3 .05m wide . had b een s et
h e
A D
a ccept
t he mound a nd p ointed o ut
B itterne h ad
G athersole ,
c irca
d id n ot
l ikely .
m ound was
would a lmost
G ratian 1 938,
mound;
o f
mound was
T he s ite a t t he
t he
s lip i s
o f
1 937 a nd
f or
t he
c onstruction
i f
were
i n
s tone
d efensive wall
l ater ,
i t
( Cotton a nd
f aced with
r oughly-
was s et o n f ootings o f f lint, r ubble a nd A t l east i n o ne s ection, t he f oundations
o n wooden piles
1 5-18cm i n d iameter
( Richmond
1 962).
E nglefield i n 1 804-5 r ecorded t hat t he wall had b onding c ourses o f l arge f lat b ricks a nd a r ampart b ank . T he e astern wall t erminated a t t he n orth i n as olid r ound t ower 5 .49m i n d iameter; a s imilar t ower had been f ound a t b etween . o f
t he
s outh e nd and another t ower o r b uttress l ay
A n umber o f
t he wall
( RIB
m ilestones had b een r e-used
2 222,
2 223,
2 226 a nd 2 228 ) .
i n
t he f oundations
T he s tone wall h ad b een
d ug i nto a n o ccupation l ayer c ontaining N ew F orest wares a nd a c oin o f V alens. Immediately p ost-dating t he wall's c onstruction , t he a rea was l evelled b y a g ravelly c lay make-up c ontaining much p ottery. This was overlain b y a s terile g ravel l ayer which seemed t o b e t he f loor o f
a t imber-framed b uilding a ssociated with
d eposit o f within
d ebris .
t he
a c onsiderable
T he b uilding s eems t o h ave b een d estroyed b y f ire
R oman
p eriod
a nd
t he
s ite
t hen
u sed
a s
a r ubbish
t ip
( Waterman 1 947) . P robably c ontemporary w ith t he wall, a b ath-house was b egun c lose b ehind i t but was n ot c ompleted . Later, p erhaps c irca A D 3 90 , a nother a ttempt was m ade t o f inish t he b uilding , b ut i t was a gain l eft unfinished . T here i s n o p articular r eason why t his s ite
n eed
h ave
h ad
a ny
c onnection with
c ould h ave b een a c ivil d efence s ome
m ilitary f unction ,
i t
m ilitary
( Cunliffe
1 968,
o r n aval
2 70) .
f orces;
E ven i f
n eed n ot h ave b een p art o f
i t
i t h ad
t he S axon S hore
d efences. At
P e 'vensey,
p resumably
t he
s outh-west
i n d isrepair o r was
g uardchamber
o f
d emolished when
t he
i ts
west
g ate
l arge b locks
was w ere
u sed t o f ill t he d itch and b uild a r oad o ver i t i n t he l ater f ourth c entury I t
h as
( Cottrill u ntil
1 937 ,
r ecently
2 45) . b een
a ccepted b y
m ost
s cholars
t hat
t he s ignal
s tations o n t he Yorkshire c oast were b uilt b y C ount Theodosius a nd t hey have b een s een a s e vidence t o s uggest where t he r aids o f t he P icti f ell i n A D
3 67 .
I t was
a t
o ne
t ime t hought
r ecorded o n t he i nscription f rom R avenscar R IB C onstantine I II r ecorded b y O lympiodorus ( frag . s tations
1 51).
T here was n ever any r eason why t hese two men n eed t o b e t he p erson .
C asey
h as
d o n ot d ate t o c irca A D 1 979B,
7 5).
T he
t o
t he
e arly
r ecently
3 68,
p ottery
f ifth
t he J ustianus
s ignal s ame
d ated
t hat
7 21 was t he g eneral o f 1 2) a nd h ence t hat t he
s uggested
c entury t hat
b ut t o t he t ime o f e vidence
1 16
p erhaps
( e.g.
t he
s ignal
Magnus
h elps
B ury
t o
1 920,
s tations
Maximus s upport
( Casey t his
h ypothesis. A c omparison o f t he l ater f ourth-century p ottery f rom H altonchesters with t hat f rom t he s ignal s tations would s eem t o i ndicate t hat t here i s a s ignificantly g reater p ercentage o f e arlier wares a t t he f ormer s ite . I f H altonchesters h ad b een a bandoned f rom c irca A D 2 70 t o A D 3 70 a nd r eoccupied b y T heodosius, t his would s uggest t hat t he s ignal s tations were n ot o ccupied s o s oon ( Turnbull 1 963, 1 60-2). T he p lans o f
t hree o f t hese s ignal s tations a re r easonably w ell k nown .
T hey a re v ery s imilar, c onsisting o f a s ubrectangular e nclosure d efended b y a s tone w all w ith p rojecting t owers a t t he a ngles e ntered b y a s ingle g ate . Within l ay a t ower a nd t he w hole was s urrounded b y a s ingle d itch . A t G oldsborough ( fig 1 6 .5) t he d itch w as 3 .66m w ide b y 1 .22m d eep a nd was s eparated f rom t he wall b y a 9 .71m b erm . T he wall ( 1.52m t hick) was f aced with r oughly-dressed s andstone , b onded with mortar a nd e nclosed a n a rea o f 3 1.72 b y 3 1.41m . T he c ircular a ngle-towers p roject l ittle b eyond t he wall b ut m uch m ore w ithin i t . A t t he g ateway , t he wall was r eturned 1 .94m f orming a p assageway 3 .03m w ide . W ithin t he d efences w ere f ound a n umber o f r ubbish p its c apped w ith s tones,
e ight h earths a nd a well .
I n t he c entre o f t he d efended
a rea was t he l ower p art o f a t ower 9 .85m s quare with walls 1 .52 t o 1 .65m t hick a bove t he o ffsets. T he excavators s uggested t hat i t s upported a s tructure 2 4 .4 t o 3 0 .5m h igh . T he t ower w as e ntered b y a d oorway 1 .52m w ide . W ithin w ere s ix l arge , r oughly-dressed s tones a rranged i n t wo p arallel r ows, s upporting t he f irst f loor .
p resumably i ntended
t o h old p osts
T hese a re a c ommon f eature i n l ate R oman
w atch t owers . I t h as b een s uggested t hat t he f irst f loor w ould h ave b een u sed t o h old s tores, weapons a nd m unitions; h ence t he n eed f or a dditional f loor s upports ( Petrikovits 1 971, 1 97) . I n t he n orth-west c orner o f t he t ower, t wo walls, 4 5cm t hick, r un f rom t he s ocketed s tone t o t he walls o f t he t ower , p erhaps t he s upport f or a s taircase ( Hornsby a nd L averick 1 932) . T he a ngle-towers a t S carborough w ere D s haped ( fig 1 6 .4) a s were t hose a t H untcliff ( fig 1 6 .3) t hough a t t he l atter s ite r ectangular s tructures h ad b een a dded t owers ( Hornsby a nd S tanton 1 912, 2 21) .
t o
t he
b ack
o f
t he
A t S carborough , t he f oundations o f t he wall h ad b een l aid o ut f orming r ight a ngles, whereas t he wall h ad r ounded a ngles. T he f oundation w as a lso m uch wider t han t he w all w hich was b uilt u pon i t . T here w as c learly a r adical c hange o f p lan d uring t he s ite's c onstruction, t hough n o e vidence was n oted t o s uggest a h iatus i n t he b uilding w ork . W hen t he s uperstructure was b uilt , ap iece o f m asonry w as a dded t o t he o uter f ace o f t he wall a t e ach s ide o f t he t ower t o h elp t o s trengthen t he wall . A t t he n orth-east a ngle , t he whole c orner h ad b een m oved f orward s o a s t o b ring i t o nto
t he f oundation .
N arrow s trips
o f
m asonry a butted a gainst t he s light i nternal p rojection o f t he t owers . N o e xplanation f or t hese was a dvanced b y t he e xcavator ( Collingwood 1 931B, 4 8) . T he R avenscar i nscription d escribes o ne o f t hese p osts a s a t ower a nd a f ort T he
s ystem
o f
s ignal
( RIB 7 21) . s tations
i s p resumably i ncomplete . b y a nother s uch p ost.
o n t he n orth-east
c oast
a s k nown t oday
F lamborough H ead m ust h ave b een o ccupied I n 1 939 a l ate f ourth-century s herd o f
C rambeck ware was f ound h ere o n t he t op o f B eacon H ill i n a g ravel p it b ut n o s tructural r emains were n oted . B y 1 940, t he whole h ill h ad b een r emoved b y g ravel working ( Kitson-Clarke 1 940). L ate R oman c oins
a nd p ottery f ound d uring e xcavations
1 17
i n t he a bbey a t W hitby m ay
i ndicate t hat a s ignal s tation s tood i n t he v icinity
( Inman 1 979 ,
2 2) .
I t i s e qually l ikely t hat t here was a s ystem o f watch-posts o r s ignal t owers a long t he c oast b etween T yne a nd T ees . M ilitary i nstallations i n t hat a rea c ould well b e c ontemporary w ith t he e arly s econd-century d efences o n t he C umberland C oast a ssociated with H adrian's Wall . S eaham has b een c laimed a s t he s ite o f as ignal s tation ( Steer 1 938; R ichmond
1 958B,
1 26).
T he
c hurch
embodies
masonry which
S teer
t hought c haracteristic o f t hat u sed i n s imilar p osts o n t he Y orkshire c oast. Many s ites o n t he c oast o f C ounty Durham have y ielded l ate f ourth-century m aterial .
D obson s uggested t hat t here m ay h ave b een a
R oman f ort a t Monkwearmouth,
S axon e cclesiastical b uildings b eing
l ater e rected w ithin i t, a s h appened e lsewhere ( Dobson 1 968-70 , 3 5-6) . S imilarly, h e p ostulated R oman military s ites a t J arrow a nd o n t he H artlepool h eadland u nder t he S axon m onastery . A d efended e nclosure o f s imilar p lan t o t hose o n t he Y orkshire c oast s urvives o n t he C hannel I sland o f A lderney t hough n o e vidence o f a c entral t ower has b een n oted. T he walls, 1 .8m t hick, s tand t o a height o f 5 .5m i n p laces. N o e vidence f or i ts d ate has b een f ound, t hough i t i s g enerally a ssumed t o b e R oman a nd c ontemporary with t he Y orkshire s ignal s tations ( Johnson J . 1 976A , 1 49 ; J ohnston 1 977B) . A t C aernarvon , l ater t han A D 3 64 , t he n orth-east g ate a nd t he d itches b eyond i t were m odified . T he o riginal F lavian c auseway a cross t he i nner d itch was r emoved when t he F lavian d itch was r ecut t o g ive a f eature o f b road 1 / '-shaped p rofile
6 .5m w ide a nd
1 .5m d eep .
A nother
d itch was c onstructed 1 0m o ut f rom t he g ate ( Casey 1 974B, 5 9). T he g ateway which Wheeler b elieved h ad u p t ill n ow o nly a t imber g uardroom o n t he n orth-west s ide , was p rovided with a s tone g uardchamber . T he d rain o r a queduct b elow t he r oad w as r emoved a nd t he s pace f illed w ith e arth
a nd
s tones;
V alentinian I .
6 1cm d own i n t he f ill were c oins
o f H elena a nd
T he r oad was t hen r esurfaced with yellow s and a nd
l ime. B eneath C onstantine I , A D
t he f loor i n t he n ew g uardroom was a c oin o f 3 33-5 . T he s pina was a lso r ebuilt i n s tone . T he
' tower' o n t he s outh e ast o f t he g ate was t hought b y Wheeler t o b e o f e arly t hird-century d ate , m ainly b ecause t he s tyle o f i ts m asonry i s v ery s imilar t o t he g uardroom o f t he s outh-west g ate c ontemporary w ith t he f ort wall ( fig 2 2 .13; W heeler 1 922A , t he f ort w all , h owever , i s o f f ourth-century d ate , t hen t his also be s o, t hough i t s eems not t o b e c ontemporary g uardchamber a t
which i s 2 74) . I f t ower m ay with t he
t his g ate .
A t B ainbridge i n t he l ate f ourth c entury, t he p rincipia was b urnt d own a nd was n ot r ebuilt. S ealed i n t he r ubble - p resumably f rom t he b uilding's d estruction - w ere t wo c oins o f T etricus a nd V alens ( Wade 1 952). P art o f t he s ite was o verlaid b y a c omplicated s equence o f w ooden s heds, w orking f loors a nd p its a ssociated with a l ime k iln a nd m ixing
t roughs
f or
l ime
( fig 5 1 .3) .
I ron a nd b ronze working
i s
a lso
a ttested ( Hartley 1 969). Where e vidence i s a vailable, a ll o ther p rincipia s eem t o have r emained i n u se a t t his t ime t hough t here i s e vidence o f m etal Ambleside . I n t he a d eposit o f c oal, r ear r ange i n t his t o h ave
b een
working within t he p rincipia o f Housesteads a nd b asilica p rincipiorum a t H ousesteads, H odgson f ound a sh a nd s coriae . W ithin t he n orthern r oom o f t he b uilding w ere f ound o ver 8 00 a rrowheads w hich s eem
i n b undles,
s ome o f
w hich l ay
d irectly u nder t he f allen
s late r oof. T he e xcavator s uggested t hat t he smith who made t he a rrows s tored i n r oom 1 2, may h ave h ad h is t emporary f orge i n t he
1 18
Also in the basilica was a fire round which were cinders, basilica. One of these pots is bones and broken pottery (Bosanquet 1904, 216). Other fires were lit, a Gillam type 229-32 dated circa AD 330-400. possibly at this time, in the rear range of rooms. No evidence was found to indicate at what date a furnace had been placed in the southern range of rooms around the courtyard at Ambleside. The ashes from it had been scattered over the floor of the room and in the Likewise, the presence of a deposit of burnt wheat courtyard gutter. overlying charcoal, the remains of an oak bin 1.83 by 1.22m, in one room of the rear range cannot be dated (Collingwood 1915, 20, 24). The robbing out of the fine masonry of the strongroom at Newcastle was associated with late fourth-century pottery (pers. comm. Miss M. Ellison). In the aedes at Caernarvon a small, roughly square structure with slightly curving sides was built; the floor of this was paved with re used building stones under one of which lay a bronze coin of Valentinian I. It was not clear what function this performed (fig 36.1; Wheeler 1922A, 295). Within the basilica principiorum at York the small room at the north-west end continued in use; a quantity of late fourth-century wares occurred in the occupation debris (Ramm 1971, 185). At least for some time in the late fourth century, five praetoria are known to have remained in use as dwellings, possibly of the commanding officer. At Ilkley the southern range of the building was demolished and overlain by a granary, but the praetorium was extended to the west by the addition of a range of heated rooms, perhaps a bath-suite, many of them were roughly built (fig 41B; Hartley 1966, 41; Woodward 1925, 178-83 ). Later, there seems to have been a considerable rise in level over much of the building; the only structure of this period Beneath the was an irregular extent of paving (Woodward's period 4). This paving paving were the burnt remains of wattle-and-daub walls. is perhaps post-Roman; Roman and medieval pottery came from the occupation layer above the flags. Various alterations took place within the praetorium at Cheaters in the fourth century. In the late r fourth century there w ere alterations to the h eatin g installations in the south-west part of the building (Harper 1961). The praetorium at Chester-le-Street has been partly excavated by Mann, Todd and Turnbull and Jones. The building had possibly begun as a re�idential suite in the fourth century. No occupation was found beneath it except for plough marks. Part of the building at least was later converted into a bath-suite and a metal-working area. Some of the hypocausted rooms were filled with debris and sealed by 10cm of concrete floor dated by the excavator to circa AD 369 (Mann 1960). One room had been subdivided into three cubicles - one of which contained a furnace, probably for bronze working. This may have happened before the late fourth century (Turnbull and Jones R. 1979). At Binchester, a bath-suite of five rooms built as a freestanding structure, was added to the praetorium in the later fourth-century, phase 6B (fig 42.1). In phase 6C, the whole complex was substantially modified and many of the larger rooms were partitioned, doorways were blocked and new ones opened. This resulted in the formation of a series of self-contained units. The building also received new opus signinum floors and was replastered. The courtyard by the via principalis, partly formed over a filled hypocausted room,
119
was entered t hrough t hree a rches. Two n ew r ooms were a dded t o t he b ath-suite i n t his p hase . T he e xcavators s uggested t hat t hese m ajor c hanges i ndicate t hat t he b aths h ad b ecome c ommunal r ather t han b eing u sed b y t he c ommandant o nly, a s i n p hase 6 b. I n p hase 6 d p arts o f t he b uilding were d ivided i nto s till s maller b ox-like u nits . I n o ne r oom were t hree f urnaces a nd a p ossible l ime k iln a nd i n a nother ( room 2 ) t he p resence o f l aid s tone s uggested t o t he e xcavators t hat i t m ay h ave b een u sed f or s laughtering a nimals . P ossibly a t t his t ime t wo a rches o f t he t riple-arched e ntrance i nto t he c ourtyard w ere b locked . N o p recise d ating f or a ny o f t hese p hases i s y et known ( Ferris a nd J ones R . 1 979 ; J ones R . 1 978) . A s imilar s ubdivision o f ap raetorium i nto s elf-contained u nits i s p erhaps t o b e s een a t H ousesteads, e specially i n t he n orth-west c orner o f t hat b uilding ( Charlesworth 1 975, 2 0). T he e xcavator implies t hat t his modification may h ave t aken p lace i n t he t hird c entury . V alens within i ts s tructure . A b ath-house
was
H ousesteads
s ome d ate a fter t he c onstruction o f
b uilding .
a t
i nserted
A wall i n r oom 1 8 s ealed a c oin o f
E xcavation o f
i nto
t he
e ast
e nd
t he e astern e nd o f
o f
b uilding
XV
a t
W ilkes' p eriod I II
t he building i n 1 981
s uggested t hat Wilkes' p eriod I II m ay d ate t o t he l ater t hird c entury a t t he e arliest, a nd h ence t he b ath-house may d ate t o much l ater i n t he f ourth c entury . T he p eriod I II b uilding , a t l east a t i ts e astern e nd, would a ppear t o have g one o ut o f u se b efore t he b ath-house was b uilt; a n umber o f l arge b locks u sed i n t he l ower c ourses o f t he b ath-house walls m ay well h ave c ome f rom t he walls o f t he p eriod I II b uilding .
A d rain ,
b uilt
t o t ake water
f rom
t he
s toke-hole a rea o f
t he b aths, smashed t hrough t he l owest c ourse o f t he eastern wall o f t hat b uilding . A t I lkley,
a n ew g ranary
praetorii
i n
t he
l ate
( fig 2 8 .3B), f ourth
was i nserted i nto t he l atera
c entury;
i t
partly
overlay
t he
C onstantian p raetorium ( Hartley 1 966, 4 1). A t s ome p eriod, t wo g ranaries had b een c onstructed i n t he r etentura a t C hesters; t hey were r emoved b y C layton w ho t hought t hey were o f l ate d ate ( Birley E . 1 959, 2 0). I t h as o ften b een a ssumed t hat i t was a s ar esult o f t he t roubles o f AD 3 67 t hat t he vicani f inally a bandoned t heir h omes and m oved i nto t he f orts b y which t hey h ad l ived ( e.g . R ichmond 1 955, 6 3) . T his movement o f a l arge n umber o f p eople within t he f orts was h eld t o a ccount f or t he p resumed s igns o f o vercrowding a t t his t ime . A t H ousesteads a nd C hesterholm , e xcavations within t he g ranaries r evealed o ccupation m aterial s aid t o b e s imilar
t o
t hat
f ound i n t he b arracks ,
i .e . t hat t hese b uildings were b eing u sed f or l iving a ccommodation ( Birley E . 1 936, 1 6; B irley R . 1 977B, 9 1). Within t he g ranaries a t H ousesteads ( cleared i n 1 931 a nd 3 2) i t was f ound t hat t he s pace b elow t he r aised f loor h ad b een f illed u p s olid a nd f lagged o ver . S impson s uggested t he p ossible r e-use o f g ranaries f or a ccommodation a t B recon G aer a nd C aersws ( Simpson G . 1 962, 1 52; 1 963, 3 7). T he u se o f t he r ear r ange o f r ooms i n s ome p rincipia , p ossibly f or a ccommodation , m ay o nly h ave b een f or t he f ew m en who w orked t here; t hese m odifications o ften d ate t o e arlier t han c irca A D L ikewise,
3 67 .
t he p resence o f r ampart b uildings i s n ot c onfined t o t he
l ate f ourth c entury, t hough s uch b uildings c onstructed c irca AD 3 67 a re k nown a t C hesterholm a nd Malton . A t l east s ome o f t hose a t
1 20
H ousesteads a nd I lkley m ay h ave c ontinued i n u se, a s m ay s ome o f t hose a t o ther s ites. T he b uilding a t M alton, 8 .23m l ong b y 5 .8m w ide, h ad a n a pse a t t he n orth e nd ( fig 2 4.2). I ts 6 1cm t hick w alls w ere b uilt a lmost e ntirely o f r e-used s tone . I t was a ssociated with a wall 1 0 .32m l ong which c ontinued t he l ine o f t he n orth-east wall , p arallel t o t he f ort wall a nd r evetted w hat was l eft o f t he r ampart b ank . A t i ts e nd , a wall a t 9 0° t o t he r evetting wall r an s outh-west f or 5 .18m . U p a gainst t his wall was a h earth o r f urnace . E xtending f or 3 .11m t owards t he a psidal b uilding was a f lagged a rea which s ealed t en c oins, t he l atest o f c irca A D 3 50 . T he f unction o f t he a psidal b uilding i s u nknown ; i ts f loor l evel w as n ot f ound ( Corder 1 930 , 2 78 ). T he m ajor c hange i n a ccommodation w ithin f orts d ates t o t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c entury n ot t o c irca A D 3 70 . C ivilians h ad b een l iving w ithin a t l east s ome f orts s ince t he e arly f ourth c entury, i f n ot a l ittle b efore. A t H ousesteads, t he e xcavated c halet b locks, b uildings X III a nd X IV , w ere l ittle c hanged t hough t here d oes s eem t o b e e vidence f or much r ebuilding i n b uilding X IV which i n m any c ases m ust h ave i ncluded t he r e-roofing o f i ndividual c halets . I n t his b uilding, many o f t he c halets w ere d ivided i nto i nner a nd o uter c ompartments b y s tone c ross w alls, s ome u nits b eing p rovided w ith n ew f lagged f loors . C halet 2 w as r educed i n l ength b y as tone w all b uilt o ver i ts p eriod I II f loor . N one o f t hese m odifications i s c losely d ated ( Wilkes 1 961, 2 88). D uring t he f ourth c entury, t he s tructure o n t he s ite o f t he e arlier c enturion's q uarters was r educed t o g round l evel; m any o f t he wall s tones s how e vidence o f w ear . A r oad s urface c ontemporary w ith t his l evel s ealed a c oin o f C onstantius I I ( pers. c omm . Mr . J . C row). I n b uilding X III , p eriod 4 m odifications ( not n ecessarily W all p eriod I V ) i ncluded t he r eduction i n l ength o f t he c halets when t he n orth w alls w ere r ebuilt , e xcluding p ortions o f t he p eriod 3 f lagged f loors . T he western e nd o f b uilding X III i n p eriod 3 must have l ain a pproximately o n t he l ine o f t he n orth g ate's s pina . L ater, a wall w as b uilt f urther t o t he west a nd t his, t ogether with t he s tone p latform c onstructed a gainst t he e ast wall o f b uilding V II , r educed t he via p rincipalis a t t his p oint t o o nly l m wide ( Daniels 1 978B) . A t Wallsend , t he c halets r emained i n u se i nto t he l ate f ourth c entury, b ut t here were a gain modifications. T hey s eem t o h ave h ad a c omplicated s tructural h istory, t he e lucidation o f w hich h as n ot y et b een c ompleted . I n t he n orth-west p raetentura, p robably a fter A D 3 67 , a s tructure m easuring c irca 1 9 .82 x 7 .32m w as b uilt , o f w hich o ne c ourse o f c rude s tonework s urvived i n p laces ( Daniels 1 976). T he w estern-most c halet a t G reat C hesters h ad t wo p eriods o f f lagged f loors; t he d ate o f t he f loors' r eplacement i s n ot k nown . I f t he b uilding o f p eriod 3 a t Malton o n a n u npublished p lan o f C order's i s p art o f a c halet b lock ( fig 4 4 .3 ) -w hich i s b y n o m eans c ertain - i t w ould s eem t o h ave b een r eplaced c irca A D 3 70 . O verlying i t were f ound a s tone wall o n ad ifferent a lignment a nd a s pread o f c obbles a nd a b ranched s tone-lined d rain d ated b y C order t o t he T heodosian p eriod. A t Maryport a nd R avenglass, i nternal b uildings were r ebuilt i n t he l ater f ourth c entury, p erhaps c irca A D 3 70 . T he p resence o f a l ate f ourth-century s tructural p hase a t Maryport was i ndicated b y a r econstruction o f t he i ntervallum r oad w hich a t t he n orth-east a ngle
1 21
o verlay t he c ollapsed c orner o f ap eriod I II b uilding.
T here was
o ccupation m aterial o f t he l ate f ourth c entury i n t he a rea . T he o nly p ossible s tructural e vidence f or a b uilding o f t his d ate w as a f ew p ost-holes ( Jarrett 1 976, 3 9). A t R avenglass t he f inal phase s tructures ( phase 4 ) were b uilt o f p osts s et i n i ndividual p ost-pits , u nlike a ll t he e arlier b uilding o n t he s ite w hich h ad h ad
t heir p osts
s et i n p ost t renches ( fig 4 8 .3). T he p hase 4 b uildings s eem t o have b een b asically o f t he s ame p lan a s t he e arlier b uildings o n t he s ite ( Potter 1 979A, 4 2). T he e arly f ourth-century b arrack-block a t P apcastle s eems t o h ave b een r etained i n u se . A s econd c obble f loor l ying d irectly o n t he f irst y ielded l ate f ourth-century p ottery f rom i ts s urface . O ther t races o f r epair o r r ebuilding i n t he s tructure w ere n ot c losely d ated ( Charlesworth 1 965, 1 03-4) . A t I lkley, h owever, t he b uilding p lan t hat h ad b een a dhered t o f rom t he A ntonine p eriod i n t he p raetentura was i gnored i n t he l ate f ourth c entury a nd n ew b uildings w ere c onstructed o n a d ifferent a lignment . O nly t wo f ragments o f t hese b uildings were f ound. An o pen a rea o f p itching r emained t o t he west o f t he b uilding i nto which t wo , t rains w ere i nserted , p robably i n t his p eriod . O verlying t he f abrica i n t he r etentura w ere s tone s labs a nd metalling ( Hartley 1 966) . I n t he n orth-west r etentura o f Bainbridge, a s tone b uilding o f l ate f ourth-century d ate o verlay t he p receding t imber b uildings ( Hartley 1 970).
I n t he s outh-east p raetentura,
t hree b uildings w ere f ound
a ligned n orth-south . T he f irst t wo were 9 .1m w ide , s eparated b y a n a lley 1 .83 t o 2 .13m wide . Another o f t he s ame s ize c ould j ust b e a ccommodated b efore t he v ia p rincipalis was r eached .
T hese b uildings
were r easonably well c onstructed - a ll h ad massive f oundations a nd u sed mortar i n t he wall c ores. N o i nternal p artitions were n oted . I n t he e ast wall o f b uilding TA was a d oorway 2 .74m wide which had a f lagged f loor r esting o n a c lay p acking a nd a c ontemporary o ven . A t a l ater p eriod, m ortar-bonded walls w ere i nserted w ithin b uilding T A o n t he f lagged f loor, o ne b locked t he oven ( fig 4 8 .4; Hartley 1 960, 1 15-6). A C aernarvon, t he b uilding ( XX), which had o bstructed passage t o h e n orth-west p ortal o f t he n orth-east g ate , w as r eplaced b y a nother ( fig 5 0 .2A ) which a llowed a ccess t o b oth p ortals . T his b uilding i s d ated t o t he l ate f ourth c entury b y a c oin o f V alens f ound within i ts c lay f loor ( Casey 1 974B, 5 9-61). B uilding XX was c ontemporary w ith t he r oad metalling, t he r econstructed n orth-east g ate a nd building X IX ( fig 5 0 .2B) . I t c onsisted o f a n arrow r ange c irca 6 .1m wide , d ivided i nto t hree r ooms a nd a n arrow p assage w ith a l arge u nit e ast
e nd a nd p erhaps
a t
t he n orth-west
e nd a s well ,
t he
a t
t he s outh-
f ormer b eing
s eparated f rom t he main p art o f t he b uilding b y a n arrow p assage . T he s uggestion b y B oon t hat t his b uilding r epresents a ccommodation f or t wo t urmae w ith t o
t he
t heir d ecurions
o rganisation o f
( Boon
c avalry u nits
1 975 ,
6 7)
m ay h ave n o r elevance
i n t he l ate
f ourth
c entury a bout
which we h ave v irtually n o i nformation . B uilding XXI c ould b e o f l ate f ourth-century d ate , t hough i t m ay b e a l ittle e arlier . I t was o f s imple h all-like p lan; B oon s uggested t hat i t might b e as table ( ibid .
6 7).
Within t he r epresented
f ort o f D oncaster, f ourth-century o ccupation was b y a b lack l ayer n early l m t hick a nd f limsy t imber
s tructures o n r ough s tone f ootings p laced a pparently without o rder
1 22
( Dolby a nd B uckland 1 971) . s treets were a gain b eing
B y t he l ate f ourth c entury, t he i nternal n eglected . T he e arly f ourth-century
i ntervallum r oad , b uilt o ver t he r ampart, w as o verlain b y a b uilding w hich u sed t he r oad s urface a s i ts f loor ( Buckland 1 973) . T he l atest R oman l evels were d evoid o f a ny p ottery o ther t han r esidual p ieces a nd c ontained many a nimal b ones . T he e xcavators s uggest t hat t here was a l ong period o f o ccupation a fter t he b reakdown o f o rganised p ottery s upplies ( Buckland a nd D olby 1 972, 2 76). T he b uilding f ound b y t he i nterval t ower S W5 a t Y ork - t he f unction o f which i s n ot r eally k nown - c ollapsed a fter A D 3 60 . F ollowing t his, t here was a g radual a ccumulation o f m aterial o ver t he a rea a nd i ndications o f c onsiderable l ate f ourth-century a ctivity . A n a rea i n t he p raetentura b ehind B lake S treet was e xcavated i n 1 975. t ribune's h ouse) was o ccupied i nto t he i n p art .
T he b uilding f ound ( perhaps a l ate f ourth c entury , a t l east
T he m ain b lock h ad a t s ome t ime b een s ubdivided t o p roduce
r ooms c irca 3 .5m s quare ( Addyman 1 976). I n t he s outh c orner o f t he p raetentura t he b arrack-blocks ( if t hat b e what t hey were) s eem t o h ave b een d emolished b y t he N ormans ( Addyman 1 975) . T he a rchaeological e vidence w ould s eem t o i ndicate t hat f ort g arrisons b efore a nd a fter c irca A D 3 70 were o f t he s ame t ype . T here was l ittle c hange i n t he t ype o f a ccommodation o r i n t he amount o f i t a vailable within t he f orts. T he f ate o f t he o fficial b uildings i n t he f ort a t t his t ime i s u nclear . W hen t he p rincipia a t B ainbridge was n ot u sable, i t was s imply d ispensed with a nd n ot r eplaced, i ts s ite b eing u sed f or metal working. A t o ther p rincipia t here i s e vidence f or metal working, t hough t he c ache o f a rrowheads a t H ousesteads s uggests t hat t here w as s till a m ilitary u nit i n g arrison a nd t hat s ome c entralised c ontrol b ased i n t he p rincipia e xisted . I t i s unfortunate t hat t he c hanges i n t he p raetoria a t H ousesteads a nd B inchester c annot a s y et b e c losely d ated . A t a n umber o f s ites, o ccupation o f t he v ici d oes n ot s eem t o h ave c ontinued b eyond t he ' Picts' War' e ven when t here h ad a pparently b een a p rosperous v illage i n t he e arlier f ourth c entury . T his w ould s eem t o have b een t he c ase a t H ousesteads ( Birley E . C harlton a nd H edley, 1 932; 1 933), t hough Mr . J .P . G illam, c onsidering t he c eramic e vidence i n t he l ight o f c urrent r esearch, i nfers much l ess f ourth-century a ctivity t han w as p reviously t hought . A t Malton t he v icus i s t hought t o have b een d estroyed i n t he ' Picts' War' t ogether with t he f ort ( Wenham 1 974, 3 1). T he r oof o f t he s o-called ' town h ouse' i n t he v icUs
i s
t hought t o h ave
c ollapsed i n t he p eriod c irca A D
3 50-67 w hen
t he whole h ouse w as d estroyed . T he e xcavator s uggested t hat a h ole d ug i nto t he middle o f a mosaic f loor was e vidence o f a d eliberate w recking o f t he h ouse; t he f loor w as s mashed a nd m ost o f t he r oof was t aken a way : " This
c an
o nly
h ave
b een
t he
work
o f
marauders.—.such
was
t he
s trength o f t he s tonework o f t he h ypocaust t hat i t i s q uite i mpossible t o i magine t hat i t c ould h ave c ollapsed" ( Mitchelson 1 964, 2 21). T he excavator d oes n ot e xplain why t he marauders would wish t o h ack t hrough a t hick c oncrete f loor o r c arry a way t he r oof m aterial . i s
not
evidence
f or
d estruction
b y
r aiders,
b ut
o f
T his
o rganised
d emolition . C utting t hrough t he h ouse was a d itch which Wenham a ssociated with t he ' wall d itch' . T his d itch r an f rom t he s outh-east g ate o f t he f ort t owards t he r iver . I t c annot have c aused t he
1 23
d emolition o f h ouse b efore
t he h ouse a s
t he
d itch
w as
a hut had b een built within t he r uined
d ug .
T he
s poil f rom
u p t o f orm a mound t o t he s outh-west o f i t.
t he
d itch
was
p iled
The s tandard o f l iving
o f t he ' town house' o ccupants s eems t o h ave d eteriorated and t he b uilding was p erhaps d emolished b efore A D 3 67 . W ith t he d igging o f t he d itch, t he a rea t o i ts n orth e ast s eems t o have been a bandoned, t hough t here was a l ittle s qualid o ccupation t o t he s outh w est o f i t . T here
i s
n o
i ndication
t hat
t he
v icani
were
moved
i nto
t he
f ort.
O nly t wo i nfant b urials were n oted b y C order a s d ating t o t he p eriod a fter A D 3 67 a s a gainst n early t hirty d ating t o t he 7 0 y ears b efore . A t C hesterholm,
t he v icus may a gain have b een o ccupied,
t hough t he
e vidence f or t his i s n ow i n d oubt. On s ite XV, a c oin o f U rbs Roma t ype A D 3 30-5, was s ealed b eneath t he h ighest f loor l evel. T he b uildings
o f v icus
I II were
o f v ery
c rude
c onstruction .
T he
r emains
o f f ragmentary b uildings were f ound a ssociatd with Huntcliff a nd C rambeck wares over a wide a rea . T he b uilding o n s ite LXXXVI was p robably
o f
extremely
l ate
f ourth-century
s qualid
o ccupation;
i ndustrial T he
r ubbish
a ccumulated
m ilitary b ath-house h ad
i t was
a dapted
i n t he v icus
d ate . a
o n
c eased
I t
g reat i ts
t o
f or a n a lternative u se
immediately t o t he west
had
f loor
f unction
o f
or
a n
d omestic
( Birley R .
1 977,
a s
t his
( Birley R . o f
a l engthy
d epth
s uch
b y
1 971) .
a nd 2 1). d ate ;
O ne b uilding
t he f ort wall a nd t o
t he
e ast
o f s ite XXIXb i s c onstructed i n i dentical s tyle t o t he ' park railing s tone' buildings
a t
Haltonchesters.
building
i s
n owhere
m entioned.
hitherto
b een n oticed
a t
I n
T his
t he
i nterim
s tyle
Haltonchesters
a nd
o f
r eport
t his
c onstruction
Rudchester,
h ad
t hough
a
s imilar building may h ave b een f ound a t L ittlechester o utside t he d efences .
T he e xcavator d escribes
" The r emains t imber
t his
b uilding
t hus:
c onsisted p rincipally o f s tone c olumn b ases, p robably f or
u prights
and
s tone
f oundation
b locks
f or
a balustrade
o r
r ailing - implying a n o pen-sided b uilding 7 .5m wide by a t l east 1 6m l ong". T his was d ated t o t he t hird a nd f ourth c entury ( Green, C .J . 1 973). ' park
r ailing
s tone' h as
Miss V . Swan).
a lso b een s een a t H igh R ochester
( pers .
A
c omm .
T he v icus I I b uilding a t C hesterholm on s ite LXXXII
which R . B irley c ompares with t he ' park r ailing s tone' b uildings a t H altonchesters,
b ears
I t i s p ossible t hat 3 67
( McIntyre
immediately
t he v icus a t G reta B ridge r emained i n u se a fter A D
1 929). s outh
l ittle s imilarity t o t hem .
A t o f
t he
P iercebridge
t he
r iver b y Dere
s ettlement S treet
a t
would,
H olme o n
t he
H ouse c oin
e vidence, s eem t o h ave r emained o ccupied u ntil t he e nd o f t he f ourth c entury ( Scott 1 972) . C ivilian l ife c ertainly c ontinued a t C orbridge a nd a lmost
c ertainly a t C arlisle .
1 24
C HAPTER 8
T HE L AST F OUR D ECADES O F R OMAN M ILITARY O CCUPATION
A fter t he e xtensive r ebuilding i n t he l ater f ourth c entury, u sually a ttributed f urther
t o
t he
work
a ctivities
has
b een
o f
C ount
f ound.
T heodosius,
S ome
p hases
i n
e vidence
o f
t he p raetorium
l ittle
a t
B inchester c ould d ate t o v ery l ate i n t he c entury, b ut t hey a re n ot a s y et c losely d ated . A t B ainbridge , b elow t he l atest r oad s urface a t t he
east
g ate,
was
a Theodosian
minim
a nd
a V alens
p lus
s everal
e arlier c oins . O n t he l atest r oad was a c oin o f G ratian ( Collingwood 1 928, 2 69; Droop a nd J ones 1 929, 2 43). T he n ew r oad s urface must d ate
t o A D
3 79 a t t he e arliest .
P ost C ount T heodosian work was n oted
i n t he i nternal b uildings . I n t he i nterior o f t he f ort a t L ancaster b y t he west r ampart, a s hallow p it was f ound f illed with b lack a sh a nd c ontaining a ll t he p ottery t ypes c haracteristic o f t he p eriod a fter c irca AD 3 70 i n n orth B ritain . s agularis, s trategraphically l ater
O n t he l atest s urface o f t he via t han t he p it, were t races o f r ough
s tone
d efences
s leeper walls
a t
9 0° t o
t he
( Jones G .
P eriod 7 a t t he n orth-east g ate o f Malton was t o b e R oman r ather t han p ost-Roman ; with i t.
1 972) .
t hought b y t he e xcavator
o nly R oman p ottery was a ssociated
A t t his t ime n o p art o f t he p revious g ate c ould have b een
v isible;
t he
g ateway
was
r epresented b y
a d epression i n t he
b ank t hrough which r an a l ightly-metalled r oad with wheel s eparated f rom r ectangular
t he p eriod
t rench
1 .83m
wide
t he c auseway i n f ront o f t erminals a nother T he
o f
t he
t rench o f
excavator
' wall
6 r oad b y
o f
v ertical
d itch' .
1 2 .81m .
t ype ,
i t
p art
1 .83m .
t ime
o f
S tilicho
s urface
L ater s till a
s ides
d riven
was
o f
f urther
( Corder
1 930,
o ut
wide b ut n ot
t he
s ame
a ttempt t o a ssign a d ate t o i t - h e t hought P enrith, t ypes o f
i n i t,
r ubbish .
a cross
t he g ate d own t o t he b edrock which l inked t he
s imilar
t hought
with
5 3cm .
r ampart
r uts
5 1-4).
o n s o
t he
c auseway,
d eep,
was
d ug .
b ut
d id
n ot
d efences,
t hat p eriod 7 d ated t o t he I n
t he
s outh
g ate
a t
O ld
a d rain ( in t he f ill o f which l ay C rambeck p ost-Pict war p ottery) was i gnored when a r ough s andstone-and-cobble
was
l aid
A t Richborough,
( Austen
1 978B) .
p robably v ery l ate i n t he f ourth o r e arly i n t he f ifth
c entury, a c hurch s eems o f t he f ort ( fig 5 1.2).
t o h ave b een b uilt i n t he n orth-west c orner N o mention o f t his b uilding was made i n t he
r eports o n t he e xcavations i n t his a rea, but i ts presence i s c lear. T he e xcavator d id n ote a small o ctagonal b asin w hich, o n a nalogy with v ery
s imilar
s tructures
o n
t he
1 25
C ontinent,
would
a ppear
t o
b e
a
b aptismal h alf o f
f ont
( Bushe-Fox
1 926 ,
t he f ort h ad 9 1cm .
p l .
X XXIII) .
I n
1 924,
o f ' mixed s oil' s tripped o ff
t he n orthern
i t .
I n
t his
w ork a n umber o f s tone b locks were f ound w hich a re o nly r ecorded o n a f ew u npublished 2 hotographs a nd o n a n u npublished p lan . T hese f ormed t wo l ines a t 9 0u a nd s eemed t o l ie a t t he s ame l evel a s t he f ont . B rown s uggests t hat a s a ll t he b locks l ie with t heir l ong a xis e ast w est,
a nd a s
t he t wo
l ines
a re n ot
e qui-distant
f rom
t he f ort
walls ,
t hen t hey a re u nlikely t o b elong t o t wo r anges o f l ean-to b uildings . T hey n o d oubt f ormed t wo s ides o f a f ree-standing t imber-framed s tructure .
H e r estored t he p lan o f
t he b uilding o n a nalogy w ith
t hat
o f a c hurch within t he f ort a t K aiseraugst which c ould h ave been o f s imilar d imensions ( Brown 1 971). I t i s p ossible t hat t he signal s tations a long t he Y orkshire c oast d ate t o t he t ime o f Magnus Maximus ( Casey 1 979B, 7 5).
T here i s n o mention o f a ny f ort h eld i n W ales o r i n n orthern England s outh west o f R ibchester i n t he N otitia . I t h as b een a ssumed t hat Wales was g iven u p b y Magnus Maximus a nd t hat i t c ould h ave been h e who r emoved t he XX V aleria V ictrix f rom C hester. Maximus i s r emembered
i n Welsh
f olklore
a s
Maxen Wledig i n c onnection with
C aernarvon . I n t he N otitia , among t he a uxilia i n I llyricum , a u nit o f S eguntienses i s r ecorded ( Oc. V II N o.49). This u nit had p resumably b een a f ormer g arrison o f C aernarvon ( Segontium ) w hich h ad b een u pgraded a nd h ad n ever r eturned t o i ts o ld p ost i n W ales. I t h as b een s uggested t hat Maximus' f orce was b uilt a round t he X X l egion a nd i ncluded t he g arrison o f Wales a nd t hose o f t he western British p rovinces,
i .e .
t he g arrisons o f a ll t he f orts i n t hat a rea h eld i n
t he f ourth c entury b ut n ot r ecorded i n t he N otitia . J arrett s uggested t hat t he C alcarienses, i f t hey d erived t heir n ame f rom C alcaria ( Tadcaster) may a lso h ave f ormed p art o f Maximus' army, t hough t hey c ould h ave b een t ransferred t o t he C ontinent o n a nother o ccasion . I n t he N otitia , t hey a ppear a s l imitanei a t S irmium u nder t he d ux f n.72).
P annoniae
T here i s n ow,
S ecundae
h owever ,
( Oc .
XXXII
4 9),
( Jarrett
n umismatic e vidence t o s uggest
1 968B,
9 0,
t hat C aernarvon
was h eld a fter t he t ime o f Maximus ( Casey a nd D avies 1 977) . Wheeler had t hough t hat o ccupation c ontinued b ut f ound n o e vidence f or t his a nd h e s uggested t hat t he a bsence o f c oins which n eed be l ater t han Maximus
was
a ccidental a nd
t hat
o n a nalogy w ith C aerhun ,
C aernarvon ,
m ay h ave b een r etained u ntil c irca A D 3 95 . O ne c oin o f M aximus a nd s ix p ost-Maximan c oins have n ow b een f ound a t C aernarvon , t ogether with a c lipped s iliqua which C asey s uggests may a dvance t he d ate o f t he l atest o ccupation i nto t he p eriod a fter A D 3 95 a nd f rom t his h e a rgues t hat M aximus c annot h ave r emoved t he S eguntienses; t his u nit m ust h ave b een r emoved b y S tilicho ( Casey 1 979B, 7 7) . T his n eed n ot h ave b een t he c ase a s Maximus c ould h ave r emoved t he u nit a nd r eplaced i t b y a nother , p erhaps i n A D 3 84 when h e r eturned t o B ritain . I t i s s urprising t hat we h ear n othing o f t he XX l egion i f i t was t aken t o t he C ontinent b y Maximus - n o u nits f ormed f rom i t ( or f rom t he V I V ictrix) a re k nown . Mr. J .P . G illam s uggests t hat we h ave s imply l ost t he N otitia s ection w hich d ealt w ith W ales a nd t he W est . T he l oss o f a whole c hapter d oes s eem t o h ave h appened e lsewhere . O n t he c oin e vidence i t h as b een s uggested t hat t he f ortress a t C hester m ay have b een a bandoned c irca A D 3 68-73 a nd t hat many o f t he t roops may h ave b een e arlier r emoved b y M agnentius
1 26
( McPeake
1 978 ,
4 3) .
Maximus m ust h ave r emoved s ome t roops f rom B ritain b ut i t i s n ot c lear h ow many a nd f rom where .
Many o f
t hese t roops m ay n ot h ave r eturned
( cf C asey 1 979B, 7 7) . C asey s uggests t hat t he a bsence o f c oinage o f t he House o f T heodosius d ated b etween A D 3 78 a nd 3 88 i s d ue t o t he r emoval b y Maximus o f t roops f rom t he i sland t hrough w hom n ew c oins p assed i nto g eneral c irculation ( Casey 1 974D) . T he p resence o f t he u surper would h ave t erminated t he d ispatch o f o fficial c oinage t o t he d iocese .
I t u sed t o b e maintained t hat i n o rder t o f ill t he g ap i n
t he B ritish d efences l eft b y t he e vacuation o f W ales, f oederati were b rought i n . A s trong f orce o f V otadini u nder C unedda w as t ransferred f rom s outh-east S cotland t o n orth Wales, r eplacing t he R oman g arrisons. T his p resupposes t hat R ome's r elations with t he t ribes n orth o f t he W all w ere f riendly; t his i s h ighly u nlikely . T here i s n o evidence o f a ny c ommercial c ontact b etween R ome a nd t he North i n t he p eriod a fter c irca AD 3 70 which i s i n marked c ontrast t o t he s ituation e arlier i n t he R oman p eriod when t here s eems t o h ave b een much t rade b etween R omans a nd n atives, p articularly i n l owland S cotland ( Robertson 1 970) . T his m ay r eflect a c essation o f f riendly r elations a t s ome t ime i n t he f ourth c entury . T he a bandonment o f t he o utpost f orts b y t he m id-fourth c entury a nd t he p robable t ermination o f t he s ystem o f p atrols b ased o n t hese f orts would i n a ny c ase have g reatly r educed t he amount o f R oman m aterial m oving n orth o f t he W all a nd hence h ave r educed t he c hances o f t his m aterial p assing i nto n ative o wnership t hrough t rade o r p lunder . Mann h as s uggested s outhern S cotland .
t hat i n t he m id-fourth c entury t he P icts t ook o ver T rouble o n t he n orthern f rontier i s r ecorded i n
A D 3 60 a nd A D 3 67 which would e xplain t he h oard o f Law, s upposedly t he c apital o f a f riendly t ribe . t hat
t he
r epresent
l ate R oman t reasure f rom t his d iplomatic g ifts
p eace o n t he f rontier .
- b ribes
f or
l oot f rom T raprain A lcock s uggests
o ppidum i s
e xample
- i n
m ore o rder
l ikely t o
t o
s ecure
T he p ayment o f s uch s ubsidies was a c ommon
f eature o f R oman f rontier p olicy, o r i t may have been t o p ay f or t he s ervices o f m ercenaries . T he p resence o f o fficially p roduced s ilver i ngots i n t he h oards f ound a t B alline a nd C oleraine m ust i ndicate t hat t hese h oards w ere o fficially s anctioned p ayments ( Alcock 1 971, 2 54 ) . S uch i ngots would s eem t o h ave b een g iven t o s oldiers o n t he a ccession o f a n emperor. O n J ulian's a ccession i n A D 3 61, h e p romised f ive g old s olidi a nd 1 -lb o f s ilver t o e ach weigh a bout o ne R oman l b. P ainter a uthorities c ontinued t o m ake t heir o wn a fter B ritain c eased t o b e a p art o f t he
man . T hese i ngots u sually s uggested t hat t he B ritish i ngots t o p ay f oederati e ven Empire ( Painter 1 965 1 972) .
Mann b elieves t hat t he m ove o f C unedda a nd h is V otadini f rom n orth o f t he Wall t o Wales i s n othing more t han a myth, p robably f ostered b y t he k ings
o f Gwynedd t o b olster u p
t heir p restige
( Mann
1 974 ,
4 2,
f n .
7 3). F rere s uggests t hat n ative t ribes o f Welsh o rigin were e stablished t o l ook t o t he d efence o f Wales . H is s ole e vidence f or t his i s t he a pparent importance o f Maximus i n Welsh t radition; h e f eels t hat Maximus must h ave d one s omething important i n t he a rea . I n a r ecent a rticle, D umville h as p rovided j ust s uch a r eason why Maximus was s o important i n Welsh t radition . H e a rgues v ery c onvincingly t hat i t was t he s ignificance which Maximus a ssumed i n G ildas e work t hat l ed h im t o b e r egarded a s: " The o nly ' British' emperor i dentifiable i n e arly Wales a nd a s t he f ounding f igure o f i ndependent p ost-Roman B ritain" ( Dumville 1 977, 1 80).
1 27
I t
i s
h azardous
t o b elieve t hat Wales was u ndefended
f ourth c entury b y R oman t roops .
i n t he
l ate
I n t he e arly f ourth c entury , we k now
o f o nly a h andful o f R oman f orts o ccupied i n t he p rincipality . T he l ate R oman d efences o f Wales a re mainly u nknown t o u s and we s hould n ot t ry t o d ate t he p eriod o f a bandonment o f a d efensive s ystem where m any o f t he i nstallations h ave y et t o b e f ound . T he c omes m aritimi t ractus c ould c onceivably h ave h eld c ommand o ver t his s ystem . T he c ontinued o ccupation o f C aernarvon a nd p ossibly C aerhun r emoves t he n eed f or Magnus Maximus t o h ave b rought C unedda i nto north Wales t o d efend i t ( cf D umville 1 977). E xcavations o n Holyhead mountain i n 1 980-81 have r evealed a Roman watchtower w hich t he e xcavator b elieves m ay h ave b een o ccupied f or a s hort p eriod o f t ime i n t he l ate f ourth c entury. 2 4 c oins, r anging i n d ate f rom C onstantius I I t o A rcadius, were f ound i n t he v icinity , 1 5 o f which p robably c ame f rom a h oard. T he s tructure was a t ower 5 .45m s quare w ith walls 1 .2m t hick a bove t he f ootings . T he e xcavator c ompared i t w ith t he H adrianic t owers o n t he C umbrian C oast w hich i t c losely r esembles . A s imilar s tructure a lmost c ertainly e xists o n C armel H ead t o 1 981).
t he n orth;
b oth m ay h ave o perated with C aer G ybi
( Crew
I t u sed t o b e t hought t hat Magnus Maximus w as a lso r esponsible f or t he a bandonment o f H adrian's Wall. T his was b ased o n t he e rroneous a ssumption t hat t here were n o c oins l ater t han t he A D 3 80s f rom t he W all ,
b ut K ent s howed t hat t his was s imply n ot t he c ase ,
t hough c oins
o f t he AD 3 80s a nd l ater a re s carce i n t he n orth, a s t hey a re a t many c ivil s ites f urther t o t he s outh w here o ccupation c ontinuing i nto t he f ifth c entury i s k nown ( Kent 1 951; c f H edley 1 937 ) . Magnus Maximus i s r ecorded a s having c ampaigned a gainst t he P icts and S cots i n A D 3 82; t he s ame s ource m isdates h is u surpation t o A D 3 81 ( Prosper T iro , C hronicon G ratiani
I V).
O n
t he
e vidence
o f
mint
marks
a nd
c oin
t ypes, C asey h as s hown t hat Maximus m ust h ave v isited B ritain a fter t he e stablishment o f h is c ourt a t T rier a nd h e s uggests t hat t his m ay h ave b een i n A D 3 84. T his c ould t ie i n with t he r elative d ating o f Maximus' u surpation a nd h is P ictish c ampaign a s r ecorded b y P rosper T iro ( Casey 1 979B, 7 1-2) . C asey s uggests t hat t he g old c oin h oard a t C orbridge c ontaining
1 3 c oins o f Maximus
d eposited c irca A D 3 84 c ould
b e c onnected with Maximus' c ampaign, a s m ay b e t he g old c oin f rom S outh S hields with t he mint mark AVG . O B, i .e . minted w hile t he c omitatus was i n L ondon . T hese c oins c ould h ave b een m inted t o p ay t he c ampaign e xpenses o r f or i ssue a s a d onative t o t he t roops o n t he s uccessful c ompletion o f t he c ampaign ( ibid 7 5) . U nits r ecorded i n t he N otitia l ed R ichmond t o s uggest t hat t his t heir
d efeat
i n B ritain l ate i n t he R oman p eriod
o f A ttacotti m ay i ndicate
( Richmond 1 958B,
1 28). A ttacotti a re r ecorded a s r aiding G aul b y S t . J erome, p robably a s e arly a s t he m id-fourth c entury; t hey p resumably a lso r aided Western B ritain . Maximus
a nd
t he
T here i s n o e vidence f or a t reaty b etween
A ttacotti,
n or
i s
t here
a ny
e vidence
t o
s uggest
whether t he A ttacotti b rought i nto t he a rmy h ad b een d efeated i n G aul o r B ritain . J ones
h as
s uggested
t hat
c ash p ayments
t o
t roops
c eased
i n t he r eign
o f T heodosius I ( Jones A . 1 973, 6 24). B y t hen, however, t he a ccession a nd q uinquennial d onatives w ere t he m ost i mportant p art o f t he s oldiers' c ash r eceipts. T roops i n N oricum i n t he m id-fifth c entury s till e xpected t o r eceive p ayment i n c ash .
1 28
A r escript o f
V alentinian, d ated t o A D 3 65, p resumably b ringing r iparienses i nto l ine with o ther l imitanei r ecords t hat : " They s hall s ecure s ubsistence a llowances i n k ind f or n ine m onths i n t he year and f or t he o ther t hree months t hey s hall r eceive t he c orresponding p rices" ( Theo & C ode 7 , 4 , 1 4) . L ack o f c oinage within a f ort p rove t he a bsence o f t roops .
i n t he l ate f ourth
c entury d oes n ot
F rere s uggests t hat n orth o f t he W all t he k ingdoms o f t he V otadini a nd S trathclyde r emained f riendly t o R ome a nd t hat Maximus p robably c reated a t hird f riendly d ynasty i n s outh-west S cotland i n t he a rea o f t he N ovantae . T he d ark-age d ynasty o f G alloway c ounted Maximus a s t he founder o f i ts l ine ( Frere 1 978, 4 05-6). Whatever t he a rrangements m ade f or t he d efence o f t he B ritish d iocese b y Maximus, t rouble f rom r aiders s eems t o h ave c ontinued . I n t he l ater A D 3 90s, S tilicho - who was e ffectively t he c ommander o f t he a rmies o f t he W estern Empire - r eorganised t he d efences o f B ritain , t hough whether h e personally v isited t he d iocese i s u nclear. I n t he p anegyric d elivered o n t he o ccasion o f S tilicho's c onsulship i n A D 3 99 , C laudian r ecords t hat S tilicho d efended t he d iocese when i t was u nder a ttack f rom t he P icts, S cots a nd S axons . T he S cots a nd S axons were n oted a s b eing s ea r aiders ( de c onsulatu S tilichonis i i, 2 50-5). E lsewhere C laudian r ecords t hat u nder H onorius, t he S axon h ad b een t amed a nd t he P ict c rushed . T his p ossibly implies t hat S tilicho c onducted a p unitive c ampaign ( cf B irley A . 1 981, 3 74-5). H owever, n othing i s r eally known o f t he measures S tilicho t ook f or t he s afety o f t he d iocese . T he t ile f rom P evensey s tamped H ON AVG A NDRIA h as n ow b een s hown t o b e a m odern f orgery ( Peacock 1 973) . Mann h as s uggested t hat S tilicho p rovided B ritain w ith i ts f irst p ermanent f ield a rmy u nder t he c omes B ritanniarum . H e a lso s uggests t hat b y t his t ime t he p ressure f rom t he P icts a nd S cots may have waned - i t was n ot u ntil t he mid-fifth c entury t hat t hey a gain p roved a n a cute t hreat t o t he a rea
t hat h ad b een t he d iocese o f B ritain .
S tilicho's r eorganisation o f t he B ritish d efences was p robably n egated b y his withdrawal o f t roops i n A D 4 01 f or t he war a gainst Aleric . C laudian d escribes t hese t roops
a s:
" The l egion t hat h ad b een l eft t o g uard B ritain - t he l egion t hat k ept t he f ierce S cots i n c heck , whose m en h ad s canned t he s trange d evices t attooed o n t he f aces o f t he d ying P icts" ( 1 1 1 b ello G othico 4 16-18 ) . I f C laudian h ere m eans a l egion i n t he t echnical s ense ,
p resumably t he
V I V ictrix a t Y ork i s m eant , b ut C laudian o ften u ses t he t erm l egio t o m ean a l evy o f t roops ( Haverfield 1 912, 2 14) . T he r emoval o f t roops a t t his t ime m ay h ave r esulted i n t he c ollapse o f t he c ommands o f t he d ux B ritanniarum a nd t he c omes t he
most
l ikely
t ime
f or
l itoris S axonici .
t he
i nstitution o f
F rere s ees a f ield a rmy
t his a s i n
t he
d iocese . A D 4 01 m ay h ave m arked t he e nd o f a c oherent d efence s ystem o n t he n orthern f rontier, a lthough a rchaeologically t he d ate o f a f ort's a bandonment a t t he e nd o f t he R oman p eriod i s v ery d ifficult t o a scertain. T he d istinctive l ate f ourth-century t ypes o f p ottery t ypological d evelopments i n t he p eriod A D 3 70-400 .
1 29
d o n ot s how a ny T hey a re o ften
p resent
o n
s ites
o ccupation a fter t he r esult o f t ime.
i n
l arge
c irca A D
quantities
3 70 ,
implying
a lthough
i t
i s
a fair
p ossible
p eriod
t hat
t his
t he s qualid l ife s tyle o f t he f ort o ccupants at
o f w as
t his
B y t he f irst d ecade o f t he f ifth c entury o r soon a fter,
m ajor
p ottery
i ndustries
i n B ritain
s eem
t o h ave
c ollapsed,
t he
p ossibly
a s a r esult o f t he d isruption o f c ommunications c aused b y t he r emoval o f t he a rmy ( Young 1 977 , 2 41) . N o l ater R omano-British p roducts t ake t heir p lace . L ate f ourth-century p ottery t hus t ends t o b e t he l atest m aterial
o n a s ite ,
s everal c enturies T he
n umismatic
C oinage
o f
o r a t
l ater
l east
t han
e vidence
t he
H ouse
i s o nly s ealed b y o ccupation material
t he f ifth . i s
o f
o pen
t o
d iffering
T heodosius
d ating
i nterpretations.
f rom
AD
3 88-402
i s
r elatively c ommon i n B ritain , t he m ain s upplies o f b ronze u ntil c irca A D 3 95 c oming f rom G allic m ints, e specially T rier, a nd a fter t hat f rom t he m int o f R ome .
I n A D 4 02,
R OMA F ELIX r eplaced n ot r each B ritain .
t he S ALUS R EIPUBLICAE t ype . T his n ew i ssue d id C asey s uggests t hat t he a bsence o f t his n ew i ssue
a n ew b ronze i ssue w ith t he l egend V RBS
must r epresent t he c essation o f payment t o t roops and o fficials i n B ritain .
T he
m ain p urpose
o f
t he b ronze c oinage s eems
t o p rovide a m eans b y which t he g overnment c ould r ecover with which wages t o b e p aid s upply
t o
( Casey
b een c oin
t o s tate employees were p aid a nd i n which t axes h ad 1 974D,
3 85) .
t he d iocese with
R adagaesus
t o h ave t he g old
i n A D 4 05 .
C asey
c onnects
t he
c essation
i n
t he i nvasions o f Aleric in A D 4 01
I f t his
i s s o,
t hen t he l ack o f
c oin or o f
t hese c oins i n
t he d iocese n eed n ot mean t hat a ll t he c ivil and m ilitary p ersonnel h ad b een r emoved b y c irca A D C oin h oards o f
4 02 .
d ating f rom A D 3 95 o nwards a re r arely f ound n orth a nd west
t he F osse
Way e xcept
f or
a g roup
i n
e ast
Yorkshire
a nd
County
D urham ( pers c omm , D r .R . R eece) . A s t he p resence o f c oins i n a n a rea t ends t o i ndicate t he p resence o f t roops ( Reece 1 977), t heir a bsence i n t he n orth a nd west m ay s imilarly s uggest t hat t here were f ew t roops i n t hese a reas a t t his
t ime .
I n t he n orth ,
o nly a t C arlisle i s
t here
e vidence f or c ontinuity o f o ccupation b eyond t he l ate Roman period . T he t own was s till o ccupied i n A D 6 85 when S t. O nly o ne c oin, t o a fter AD e xpect
h owever,
3 88
( pers
o ut o f a t otal o f c omm,
t hat a ll t he f orts
a p lanned withdrawal o f o f
t he f ourth c entury,
m ay h ave b een s o
l ow
T he
c ame
e nd p robably
c ash
a nd g oods,
Mr.I. C aruana).
N oricum A t
i s
o f
1 979)
d ates
n o r eason t o
t he
t roops
f rom t he
i sland .
B y
t he
e nd
t heir
r emoval
would
h ave
b een
u ndesirable .
g radually a nd with t he c essation o f p ayments
t he s oldiers
will h ave
r eturned
t o
t he
l and .
By
i n t he
a lthough t he f ield a rmy t roops were p robably t he f rontier t roops
s eem
t o
have
d epend o n l ocal h ereditary r ecruitment ( Dobson a nd Mann T he g radual d issolution o f t he f rontier p rovince o f
r ecorded
o nly a f ew
n ature
t o
These i s
t he s tandard a nd n umber o f t roops i n m any f orts
l argely r ecruited f rom f ree G ermany, c ontinued t o 1 973, 1 96).
C uthbert v isited i t .
( found u p
i n t he d iocese were a bandoned a s ar esult o f a ll
t hat
l ate f ourth c entury,
3 41
s ites
t heir
i n t he ' vita S ancti i s
t here
any
a bandonment .
S everini%
a rchaeological
p rincipalis a t B irdoswald t he e xcavators a nd t hen b urnt s oon a fter A D
3 75,
t he a rea ( Richmond a nd B irley E .
e vidence
f or
t he
I n t he b uilding n orth o f t he v ia t hought
i t
had b een
looted
t here b eing n o f urther o ccupation i n 1 930,
1 71).
I t was suggested t hat
a t C hesterholm t he l ast p eriod i n t he r ampart b uilding b y t he east wall e nded i n d estruction b y f ire o n t he e vidence o f
1 30
t he b urnt p ottery
w ithin i t c ould
( Birley E .
1 931,
2 11).
h ave b een a ccidental ;
" both
B irdoswald
d estroyed"
( Frere
a nd
A t b oth t hese s ites
t here
i s
n ot
C hesterholm
1 978 ,
4 17) .
T he
e nough
s eem
f inal
t o
t he d estruction
e vidence
h ave
p eriod ,
t o
b een
p hase
s ay
t hat
v iolently
I V ,
b uildings
a t Ravenglass w ere t hought b y t he e xcavator t o h ave b een d ismantled a t t he end o f t he o ccupation, implying a n o rderly withdrawal f rom t he f ort ( Potter 1 979A , 4 5) . T he praetorium o f B inchester had most o f i ts d ebris r emoved b y t he 1 9th c entury e xcavators . T he u ndisturbed s ubstantial r ubbish d eposit i n t he y ard a rea, h owever, would s eem t o imply t hat t he b uilding d ecayed n aturally a ctivity
here.
s ubstantially s eventh
( Jones R . T he
i ntact
c entury
a nd
o r
1 977).
p rincipia i n
l ater
T here may have b een s ub-Roman
a t
u se
Y ork
u ntil
( Ramm
would
1 971,
3 16).
O n t he
S axon S hore,
t o,
t o have
f ire
i n
c enturies,
a nd e xit f rom t he d iocese.
t he
b een e arly
A t Leintwardine, i n f ire
( Stanford
R ichborough h eld a n a nomalous
l ate f ourth a nd e arly f ifth
e ntry
b y
1 86).
f inal p eriod d ated t o t he f ourth c entury e nded t he
a ppear
d estroyed
b eing
t he
t he 1 968,
p osition i n
main p ort
o f
O n t he n umismatic e vidence,
o ccupation i s a ttested until AD 4 07 a nd may have c ontinued a l ittle l ater.
T he
l ater
f ourth
a nd
e arly
f ifth
c entury
c oinage
R ichborough a ccounts f or 4 5% o f a ll t he c oinage f rom t he s ite . t his
r espect
i t
i s v ery u nusual .
4 02 ,
o nly f ive s ilver c oins
t he Yorkshire
c oast.
s keletal r emains
o f
i s
o f C onstantine I II b eing
o f
l ater
p rovided a t
t wo
I n
t he
o f
t he
s ignal
military
s tations
1 4 h umans - m en ,
women a nd c hildren .
having
s outh-east b een
o n
c orner
o f
t he
T he s kulls
( Hornsby a nd S tanton 1 912,
t ower
a t
G oldsborough
s keleton o f a m an who h ad f allen a cross t he s mouldering f ire, a fter
d ate .
Within t he well a t Huntcliff were f ound t he
were s eparated f rom t he r est o f t he b ody 2 3 0.
I n
C oin l oss v irtually c eased a fter A D
T he most g raphic e vidence f or t he v iolent d estruction o f i nstallations b y r aiders
a t
s tabbed
i n
t he
b ack.
T he
s kull
was
t he
p robably
s howed
much
e vidence o f a v iolent d eath w ith s evere wounds t o t he h ead c aused b y a sword a nd/or a s pear, whilst c lose b y was a nother man l ying f ace d ownwards;
b eneath h im was a l arge d og, i ts head a gainst t he man's
t hroat a nd i ts paws a cross h is s houlders.
S ir A . K eith, who wrote
t he r eport o n t he human r emains, t hought t hat t hese two men were o f R omano-British o rigin a nd r epresented t he l ast d efenders o f t he s ignal s tation. A f ragment o f a s kull a lso c ame f rom within t he t ower. T he e xcellent p reservation o f t hat
t hey
were
s oon
c overed
t he b y
s keletons
t he
e ntire
F rom t he well c ame f urther h uman b ones, n umismatic e vidence, s oon
a fter A D
I n A D
4 06 ,
3 95
t he e xcavators
t roops
t hought o f
O n t he
1 932) .
t he B ritish a rmy e levated a man c alled Marcus t o t he p urple C asey s uggests t hat t he hiatus i n p ayment o f
f rom c irca A D 4 02 a nd a s ense o f
Marcus
r eplaced b y a lso
i ndicate s tructure .
o ne o f a y oung woman .
i solation b rought a bout b y
b arbarian i nvasions o n t he C ontinent were t he c auses 3 85).
t o
t he
d ated t he e nd o f t he o ccupation t o
( Hornsby a nd L averick
f or reasons unknown . t he
was
c ollapse
was
s oon
d eposed b y
G ratian a municeps
murdered
b y
t he
i n A D
s oldiers
C onstantine t o t he t hrone .
who
( Casey
t he s oldiers a nd k illed, 4 07 . t hen
F our
m onths
r aised
l ater
a s oldier
1 974D, b eing h e
was
c alled
These events a re r ecorded b y t he v ery
i nept G reek h istorian Z osimus who would s eem t o h ave u sed t he m ainly l ost work o f O lympiodorus who was a d irect c ontemporary o f t hese e vents
- he
wrote a h istory
o f
1 31
t he p eriod AD
4 07
t o 4 23 a nd d ealt
mainly was
with
t he west .
c rossed
p enetrated B ritain T he
b y
A t
a l arge
t he v ery e nd o f A D
number
o f
i nto n orth-west G aul .
f eared
e levation
t hat o f
t he
i sland
Z osimus would
b e
t he R hine f rontier
Alans
r ecords
and
t hat
b y
i n
c ontext
t his
S ueves
who
t he t roops
i nvaded
t he s oldier C onstantine
A s s oon a s h e t ook over power,
4 06 ,
V andals,
t hese
i n
b arbarians . m akes
s ense .
h e c rossed t o G aul with much o f
t he
B ritish g arrison, p resumably with t he a pproval o f t hose who had s o r ecently r aised him t o t he purple. have
marked
t roops .
t he
e nd
o f
T his withdrawal o f t roops may
o rganised d efence
o f
t he d iocese b y
Roman
I t i s n ot c lear h ow m any t roops C onstantine I II r emoved f rom
B ritain o r f rom where t hey were d rawn, b ut presumably t he r ecently i nstituted
f ield
a rmy
a ccompanied
him .
I t
would
p erhaps
b e
s urprising i f t he u nits t hat had been g arrisoning f orts f or d ecades wished
t o
l eave
C onstantine
I
t heir h omes a
c entury
f or
t he C ontinent,
b efore
may
h ave
t hough
t he
e xample
p roved
an
i ncentive .
C onstantine I II must h ave b een s eeking t o d raw a ttention h e r enamed h is t wo s ons J ulian a nd C onstans . I n A D 4 08,
t o t his
o f
when
i t i s l ikely t hat t here was a S axon i nvasion o f Britain;
i t was r ecorded b y t he Gallic C hronicler o f 4 52 ( Thompson E . 1 977). T hompson s uggests t hat t he S axons t ook t he o pportunity t o a ttack B ritain o n s eeing i t s tripped o f
m any o f
i ts
t roops .
With t he r evolt
o f G erontius, who was a t t he t ime c ommanding most o f Constantine's t roops
i n S pain,
C onstantine was
i n n o p osition t o d efend B ritain;
t herefore t he B ritons r ebelled a gainst R ome a nd a gainst t he i nvaders.
d efended
a fter A D 4 07 o f a ny R oman t roops i n t he d iocese .
I n A D 4 10 t here was
t he f amous r escript o f H onorius t o t he B ritish c ities own
d efence
t hemselves
T here i s n o mention i n t he l iterary s ources
( Zosimus
V I,
1 0,
2 ).
T his
h as
b een
t o
l ook t o t heir
s een b y
marking t he o fficial e nd o f R oman r ule i n t he i sland,
many
a s
but r ecently
d oubt has b een c ast o n t he r elevance o f t his passage t o t he British d iocese
a nd K ent
B ritain a t t his
p assage
a t A rles
has
a ll b ut i s
t o
t o
b e
i n A D 4 11,
s uggested
t hat
t he
o f
c ities
i nterpreted,
t he p assage
R aetia w ith
( Kent
d oes n ot r efer t o
1 979 ,
t he d eath o f
1 8) .
H owever
C onstantine
I II
P rocopius c ould write :
" The R omans were n o l onger a ble t o r ecover B ritain, but i t r emained f rom
t hat
t ime
u nder
t yrants"
( BV I II,
2 ,
3 8) .
Whether t here were a ny R oman t roops s till i n B ritain in t he s econd d ecade o f s ome
t he f ifth
t roops
were
c entury l eft
i s
i n
i mpossible
t he
t o
s ay .
i sland b ecause
I t
i s
t o h ave
l ikely
t hat
s tripped
t he
d iocese t otally o f i ts d efenders would not have b een in C onstantine I II's i nterest. p aid
I f t roops r emained, t hey were c ertainly n ot being
i n n ewly-minted
c oin .
O f
t he
e nd o f H adrian's
Wall,
B reeze
a nd
D obson wrote : " There
i s
l ittle
e vidence
f or S axons
- a nd n one f or P icts
o n H adrian's Wall a nd we may a ccept
t hat
r eturned
h ad
1 976, B y
t o
t he
s oil
f rom
which
t hey
t he s oldiers s prung"
a nd S cots o f
t he
-
Wall
( Breeze a nd Dobson
2 32).
t he s econd
d ecade
o f
t he
f ifth
b y t he R oman a rmy h ad c eased.
1 32
c entury,
t he o ccupation o f
B ritain
C HAPTER 9
T HE N OTITIA D IGNITATUM
T he Notitia D ignitatum i s a l ate Roman d ocument p reserved t oday i n f our main m anuscripts o f 1 5th a nd 1 6th c entury d ate . T hese a ll s eem t o h ave b een c opied f rom t he C odex S pirensis w hich i s p robably a 1 0th c entury c opy o f t he o riginal l ate R oman d ocument, t hough i t d oes n ot s eem t o h ave b een c opied d irectly . D ue t o o ur m anuscripts b eing s o f ar r emoved f rom t he o riginal,there a re a n umber o f c opyist e rrors, A lso, s ome s ections o f t he d ocument d o n ot s eem t o h ave s urvived , e .g . t he s ections o f t he v icarius o f I taly a nd t he d ux L ibyarum . T he
d ocument
whose
f ull
t itle
i s
" Notitia
Dignitatum
e t
a dministrationum t am c ivilium q uam m ilitarium i n p artibus o rientis e t o ccidentis",
i s
a n i llustrated l ist
o f
a ll t he c ivil a nd m ilitary
o fficials i n t he Empire a t s ome d ate a fter t he d ivision o f t he Empire i nto e astern a nd western p ortions . I n t he m ilitary s ections, u nder e ach o fficial , t here i s a l ist o f a ll t he t roops u nder h is c ommand a nd where t hey were s tationed . I t i s h ence a n i nvaluable d ocument f or t he military h istorian o f t he L ate R oman Empire . T here
a re ,
h owever ,
g reat
d ifficulties when o ne a ttempts
t o u se t his
d ocument . I t d oes n ot s eem p ossible t o a ccept t hat i t r epresents t he d isposition o f f orces i n t he Empire a t a ny o ne t ime . S ome s cholars n otably B ury - r easoned t hat t o b e o f a ny u se t he d ocument must r epresent t he s ituation a t o ne p articular p oint i n t ime. H e was h ence f orced t o d ate t he whole d ocument b y i ts l atest e ntry ( Bury 1 920) . 4 24 .
I n
t he N otitia o ccidentis
t he l atest
e ntry
d ates
t o a fter A D
One unit h as t he t itle ' Placidi V alentinianici f e nces' .
I t
a lso r ecords t he d ux P annoniae S ecunda a nd t he d ux V aleria . T hese p rovinces were n ot r ecovered f rom t he H unns u ntil A D 4 27 . S alisbury , h owever , p ointed o ut t hat t he s ection o n t he P annonian p rovinces c ould d ate t o t he p eriod o f T heodosius a nd G ratian, i .e . b efore t hese p rovinces were t emporarily l ost t o t he Empire ( Salisbury 1 927 , 1 06 ) . W ith r egard t o B ritain , h owever , i s
v ery
p roblematical.
t his h omogenous d ating o f t he N otitia
I t h as
g enerally
b een a ccepted t hat
t he
r escript o f H onorius t o t he c ities o f B ritain t o l ook t o t heir own d efence e ffectively m arks t he e nd o f R oman r ule i n t he i sland . B ury c ould n ot a ccept t hat s ome s ections o f t he N otitia would b e o lder t han o thers a nd h e c ould s ee n o r eason w hy t he p rimicarius n otariorum , t he m an r esponsible f or d rawing u p t he d ocument,
would s eek t o i ncorporate
o ut-of-date m aterial i n what i s t hought t o b e, b y many s cholars, a n o fficial working d ocument . H owever , i n t he f ace o f t he n umismatic e vidence f rom H adrian 's W all , B ury d id c oncede t hat t he W all m ay h ave b een a bandoned b y C onstantine I II. T his g oes a gainst his whole
1 33
t hesis s ince , i f o ne s ection c an b e o ut o f d ate , t hen n o d oubt o thers c an e asily b e s o . T his p oint was s eized u pon b y C ollingwood w ho a rgued f rom t he n umismatic e vidence t hat B ritain a fter A D 4 10 was i mpossible . d ecade o f a bruptly .
a ny R oman o ccupation o f
C oins c ome d own i nto t he
f irst
t he f ifth c entury i n f air q uantities a nd t hen c ease C oins o f A rcadius o n most s ites g reatly exceed t hose o f
H onorius,
i mplying t hat s oon a fter H onorius b ecame A ugustus i n A D
t he
s upplies
c oin
t o
t his
c ountry
- a nd
t he
military
o fficials f or which t his m oney was p rovided - c eased, 1 922A, 8 2).
a nd
3 93 ,
c ivil
( Collingwood
Q uite whether we a re j ustified i n a rguing f or t he a bandonment o f a p rovince d ue t o a c essation i n t he c oin s upplies i s u nclear. I n N oricum t he g arrison o f t he l imes c eased t o r eceive r egular p ay c irca A D 4 00 . T he c oin s eries h ere, a s i n B ritain, c ontains m any m ore c oins o f A rcadius t han H onorius - c oin s upplies m ust h ave v irtually c eased e arly i n H onorius' r eign ( Alföldy 1 974 , 2 13) . N ormal m onetary c irculation a like i n t he D anubian f orts a nd a t m any s ettlements i n t he i nterior c ame t o a n e nd . Y et we k now f rom t he L ife o f S t . S everinus t hat a t l east u p t o A D 4 60 t here were s till s ome f orts g arrisoned b y r egular t roops, t hough t his would s eem t o h ave c eased v ery s oon a fter . S tein a rgued t hat t he p resence o f c oins i mplies t rade ( Schultz 1 933 , 4 2),
b ut t his
d oes n ot
s eem t o b e
t he
c ase a s
t he
main p urpose o f
c oins was t o p ay s tate e mployees, b e t hey s oldiers o r c ivil s ervants . H ence , t he c essation o f c oin s upplies s hould m ean t hat t here were n o l onger a ny s tate employees i n a p rovince, i .e . t hat i t h ad b een a bandoned . I n N oricum t he s oldiers d o s eem t o h ave b een p aid , t hough o nly v ery i nfrequently. T here i s n ot a t otal a bsence o f l ate c oins i n t he p rovince - a n umber a re f ound a t L auriacum . Mommsen b elieved t hat t he N otitia a s a whole b elonged t o t he y ear A D 4 24-5 b ut t hat t he p art r elating t o B ritain was a t t his t ime o bsolete . I t
m ust
c ertainly b e a ccepted t hat
t he N otitia c ontains n umerous
s trata o f i nformation which d iffer i n d ate, o ften t o q uite a marked d egree .
S eeck p ointed o ut t hat s ome f ormations l ower d own i n t he
d istributio n umerorum o f O c . c h . V II a ppear i n h igher g rades i n c hapters V a nd V I . Y et e ach c hapter s till c ontains l ater a dditions ( Stevens T hese
1 940,
1 43).
i nconsistences
h ave
l ed
t o
d oubts
b eing
c ast
o n
t he u sefulness
o f t he d ocument t o t he l ate R oman g overnment a nd h igh c ommand, a nd h ence d iscussion a s t o whom t he p articular d ocument o f which w e h ave a c opy b elonged . T he N otitia was d rawn u p b y t he primicerius n otariorum: t here were two p rimicerii a t t he t ime o f t he N otitia's c ompilation - o ne f or t he E astern a nd o ne f or t he Western E mpire . p repared a nd i ssued t he c odicilli g iven t o e very h igh o fficial
H e
o n h is
a ppointment t o h is p ost . I n t he primicerius' b ureau t he c odicil o f i nstallation was p repared which c ontained t he t itle o f t he f unctionaries u nder h is c ontrol, t he c onstitution o f his s taff a nd a lso,
p ainted i n c olour,
t he i nsignia o f h is o ffice .
T here i s e vidence i n t he d ocument f or c orrections - s ome p arts d o s eem t o h ave b een u pdated whilst o thers were n ot . A lso, w hen s ome e ntries h ave b een u pdated, t he o bsolete i nformation has n ot b een d eleted . H ence we f ind i n s ome c ases t he s ame u nit b eing r ecorded a t t wo d ifferent p laces. I n t he a rmy o f t he c omes A fricae ( 21 .ch. XXV) which c ontains H onoriani t here a re t wo u nits d estroyed i n AD 3 73 .
1 34
U nder t he d ux Mesopotamiae ( Or . c h . XXXVI) t here i s a ' Theodosian' i tem , y et h e i s c redited with t he l egions I a nd I I P arthica d estroyed i n A D 3 59, b ut n ot with V P arthica which was a lso d estroyed i n t hat s ame y ear ; i t h as b een d eleted ( Tomlin 1 972, 2 55, f n .8) . A s imilar i nconsistency c an b e s een w ith r eference t o B ritain . T he e ntry f or t he i nfantry u nits o f t he c omes B ritanniae omits t he p hrase ' intra B ritannias'
( p _s_ . ch.
V II).
T he g eographical d esignation i s
n owhere e lse omitted i n t he d istributio , n ot e ven a t t he h ead o f t he e ntry f or t he c avalry u nits o f t he c omes B ritanniae . M ann s uggests t hat o n t he l oss o f B ritain c irca A D 4 10 t he w ords ' intra B ritannias' w ere t o b e d eleted b ut t hat t he c lerk f orgot t hat t he e ntry a ppeared t wice Mann 1 976 , 4 ) . I t
i s
e vident t hat t he e astern s ection o f t he N otitia i s much m ore
c onsistent; i t s eems t o h ave b een r evised f airly t horoughly c irca A D 3 95, t hen l eft v irtually u ntouched ( Jones A . 1 973, 1 417). T he d ocument t hat we have was p resumably u sed i n t he west, t he e astern s ection b eing r etained o nly f or r eference p urposes. S ome h ave s uggested ( e .g . F rere 1 978, 2 61) t hat t he d ocument b elonged t o a p rivate i ndividual who was a ble t o u pdate o nly t hose p arts o f t he western d ocument with w hich h e w as f amiliar .
O thers s uggest
t hat i t
w as a n o fficial d ocument, t he o bsolete s ections b eing r etained i n t he h ope t hat t he a reas a t t he m oment o f writing l ost t o t he Empire m ight s oon b e r ecovered, i n which c ase i t would b e u seful t o k now what g arrison s trength a nd d isposition h ad b een d eemed n ecessary t o h old a g iven a rea . Mann
s uggests
t hat
t he
v ersion
o f
t he
N otitia
which
we
p ossess
b elonged t o t he o fficium o f t he magister peditum p raesentalis, a nd t hat t he c lerks t here h ad r ather c rudely a ttempted t o c onvert t he d ocument i nto o ne a imed s olely a t r ecording m ilitary i nformation o f i nterest t o t he m agister p editum . I t w ould s eem t hat m ost i nterest h ad b een f ocussed o n k eeping t he f ield a rmy s ection, i .e . t he d istributio o f c hapter V II u p t o d ate . L ess i nterest h as b een t aken i n t he r est o f t he m ilitary e stablishment . W ith a d ocument o f t his c omplexity a nd with t he many major c hanges i n t roop d ispositions o ccurring i n t he l ate f ourth a nd f ifth c enturies,
i t must h ave b een
v ery d ifficult t o k eep t he d ocument u p t o d ate; a ccuracy was n ot d eemed n ecessary ( Mann 1 976 , 5 ) .
p erhaps
t otal
T he -Notitia r ecords t hree c ommands i n B ritain - t hat o f t he c omes B ritanniae, t he c omes l itoris S axonici p er B ritanniam a nd t he d ux B ritanniarum. T he f irst c ommend i s o nly mentioned i n t he N otitia . T he c omes l itoris S axonici may b e t he s ame a s t he c omes maritimi t ractus r ecorded b y Ammianus a s b eing i n B ritain i n A D 3 67 ( A .M . XXVII,
8 .1).
Ammianus,
w riting o f
t he e vents o f A D 3 67 a nd 3 68 ,
m akes n o m ention o f
a c omes B ritanniae a lthough i t would h ave b een a pposite t o h ave d one s o i f t hat c ommand h ad b een i n e xistence . S ome s cholars maintain t hat t he c ommand was o nly i nstituted a fter B ritain h ad b een a bandoned c irca A D 4 10 . S eeck s uggested t hat t he c omes was a ppointed t o c arry o ut t he r econquest - a c ommand which h e n ever a ctually a ssumed ( Collingwood 1 922,
8 5).
B ury m aintained t hat t hree o f t he c avalry
u nits u nder t he c omes' c ommand d ate t o a fter A D i n with t he p ost A D 4 10 c ommand, t hough B ury
1 35
4 28 . T his c ould f it g ives n o r eason why
t hese u nits n eed t o b e s o l ate . C ollingwood t ried t o l ink t he c omes B ritanniae with t he ' secunda u ltio' o f G ildas . T his g oes a gainst t he a rchaeological e vidence which C ollingwood h imself h ad u sed t o r efute B ury's
t hesis
i n
h is
a rticle
o n
t he
R oman
E vacuation
o f
B ritain
( Collingwood 1 922A). T here i s n o e vidence f or R oman a ctivity i n B ritain a fter t he f irst d ecade o f t he 5 th c entury . T he c omes B ritanniae c ommand m ust d ate t o s ome t ime b etween A D 3 67 a nd 4 10 . T here had b een a c omes i n B ritain a t a much e arlier d ate . Ammianus r ecords ( A .M. XXX, 7 .2) t hat V alentinian's f ather, G ratian, h ad c ommanded t he a rmy i n B ritain with t he r ank o f c omes t hough t his c ommand d oes n ot s eem t o have b een p ermanently e stablished a t t hat d ate . I f G ratian s erved i n B ritain a nd A frica a s a r egular f rontier c ommander, h e p robably would h ave b een r eferred t o a s c omes e t d ux . C omes was a n h onorific t itle a nd n eed n ot imply a particular p ost ( Mann 1 977, 1 3). T here
were
s ix
c avalry
i nfantry units ( Oc. r epresents i s u nclear .
u nits
u nder
c h. V II). B ury h as
t he
c omes' c ommand
a nd
t hree
Q uite how l arge a f orce t his s uggested a f orce o f 5 ,500 ; F rere
s uggests 6 ,000 a t t he maximum ( Frere
1 978,
2 69),
b ut t hese must a t
most b e i nspired g uesses. We have v ery l ittle i nformation o n t he s ize o f l ate R oman u nits. A s o ne o f t he c avalry units i s named ' Honoriani' , t he c ommand was p robably i n e xistence u nder H onorius t hough t he unit n eed not h ave r eceived i ts t itle while H onorius was Emperor . I t n eed d ate n o l ater t han A D 3 87 ( or e ven A D 3 84). L ibanius
( Or .
X IX
6 2)
makes
a c lear
a llusion
H onorias i n as peech c omposed i n A D 3 87 .
t o
t he
p rovince
o f
H onorius was b orn o n 9 th
S eptember A D 3 84 b ut was o nly made Augustus o n 2 3rd J anuary A D 3 93 ( Jones A . 1 973, 4 18). Mann b elieves t hat i t was S tilicho w ho began t he p ractice o f c reating small , p ermanent f ield a rmies, t oo s mall t o q ualify f or t he a ppointment o f a m agister , a nd which were t herefore p laced u nder t he c ommand o f men o f t he n ext l ower r ank, t he c omes. Mann t hus d ates t he Notitia i n i ts b asic f orm t o c irca A D 3 95 M ann 1 976 ,
8 ) .
F rere s uggests
t hat t he c ommand c ould h ave b een i nstituted
b y S tilicho c irca A D 4 02 t o c ompensate f or his r emoval o f l arge n umbers o f t roops f rom t he c ommands o f t he d ux B ritanniarum a nd c omes l itoris S axonici which h e b elieves would h ave virtually c aused t he c ollapse o f t hese f rontier c ommands ( Frere 1 978 , 2 69) . T he i nsignia o f t he c omes B ritanniae
( 252
c h .
XXIX) s hows a s ingle
f ortification i n B ritain . T here i s n o i ndication a s t o w here t he f ield a rmy was b ased; n o f ield a rmy b ase i s k nown a nywhere i n t he Western Empire . I n B ritain, t he f ield a rmy i s n ot d efinitely r ecorded i n t he a rchaeological r ecord a t a ll . H ence a rchaeology c an g ive n o c lue t o t he d ate o f h is e xistence b efore c irca A D 4 10 ) .
c ommand
( except
t o
i ndicate
i ts
T he c omes l itoris S axonici h ad u nder h is c ommand n ine f orts w hich were s ituated o n t he s outh a nd e ast c oasts o f B ritain . T he d ating o f h is c ommand i s a gain p roblematical . I t i s g enerally a ssumed t hat t he c ommand a s p reserved i n t he N otitia d ates t o t he e nd o f t he f ourth c entury, t hough a t a n umber o f f orts o n t he l itus S axonicum ( Reculver , L ympne, ? Portchester), t he a rchaeological e vidence would s eem t o i ndicate t hat t hey had b een g iven u p b y t his t ime . I t i s n ot c lear whether t he c omes maritimi t ractus r ecorded b y Ammianus s hould b e e quated
with
t he
c omes
l itoris
S axonici .
1 36
I f
t hey
a re
t he
s ame
o fficial, t hen o bviously t he c ommand m ust N ectaridus may j ust b e a ' comes e t d ux' . I f
d ate b efore A D 3 67. h e r eally was c omes
l itoris S axonici, i t i s u nclear why t he c ommand h ad a chieved a r ank h igher t han t hat o f t he c ommander o f t he n orthern f rontier . T he f orts t hemselves were p robably a ll i n e xistence i n t he l ate t hird c entury, t hough t hey were n ot a ll h eld a t t he t ime o f t he N otitia's c ompilation . T en f orts a re k nown o n t he s outh a nd e ast c oasts w hich w ould s eem t o h ave b een c onstructed a s a d efence a gainst s ea r aiders a nd t o b e b roadly c ontemporary. O ne o f t hese h ad p resumably b een a bandoned a t t he t ime when c hapter X XVIII was c ompiled .
S tevens
t hought
t hat
t he m ilites T ungrecani a t D ubris a nd t he n umerus
T urnacensium a t L emanis h ad o riginally b een s tationed o n t he T ongresB avai l imes which s eems t o h ave b een a bandoned u nder G ratian . H e would t hus h ave l iked t o d ate O c . c h . XXVIII t o a fter A D 3 75 ( Stevens 1 940, 1 37-8). T hese u nits d o n ot n eed t o h ave r eceived t heir n ames f rom l ong a ssociation with T ongres o r T ournai; t hey c ould h ave been r aised f rom t hese a reas. O ther units o f T ungrecani a re k nown i n t he m id-fourth c entury . O nly t he T ungrecani i n t he B ritish s ections o f t he N otitia a re c alled m ilites . V an B erchem t ook t his t o i mply t hat t hey m ust h ave b een t he l ast r einforcements t o t he c oastal d efences
S ome
o f
( Van B erchem
t he u nits
1 955) .
i n t he S axon S hore f orts d o s eem t o h ave b een t here
f or a l ong p eriod o f t ime .
T he c ohors I B aetasiorum i s a ttested o n
t ile
o f
s tamps
f rom
R eculver
t hird-century
d ate .
T he
u nits
o f
B rancaster a nd B urgh C astle must h ave b een l ong s tationed a t t hese f orts t o h ave p icked u p t he f ort's n ame . T he o ther u nits m ay T v-I t b e t he o riginal o nes t o have g arrisoned t hese f orts. S ome c ould h ave b een brought i nto B ritain b y T heodosius i n A D 3 67, t hough n one I s s o r ecorded b y Ammianus . T wo u nits t hat h ad p reviously b een s tationed a t Pevens e y, t he milites Andere tiano rum and t he c lassis A nderetianorum ,
a re r ecorded i n t he N otitia u nder t he d ux Mogontiacum
a nd a t P aris r espectively. ( Here a milites unit was r eplaced b y a n umerus - s ee V an B erchem a bove) . T ile s tamps f rom B rancaster r ecord t he c ohors I A quitanorum; i t may h ave b een t he f ort's f irst g arrison. J ohnson s uggests t hat o riginally t he l itus S axonicum c ommand i ncluded b oth s ides o f t he C hannel ( Johnson J . 1 976A , 1 43). Two s ites i n G aul, G rannona u nder t he d ux t ractus A rmoricani a nd Marcae u nder t he d ux Belgicae S ecunda a re r eferred t o a s b eing ' in l itore S axonico% T his would e xplain t he a pparent a nomaly o f t he c omes l itoris S axonici h aving m any f ewer t roops u nder h is c ommand t han t he l ower r anking d ux B ritanniarum . A ppointment t o s ome o f t he m ore i mportant o ffices c ame t cYcarry with i t t he e levation t o t he r ank o f c omes . T his s oon b egan t o happen with t he more important f rontier d ucates ( Mann 1 977, 1 3). J ohnson s uggests t hat t he ' dux l itoris S axonici' was e levated t o a c omes p erhaps when C onstans c ame t o B ritain i n A D 3 42-3 . T he c ommand o f t he c omes embracing b oth c oasts o f t he C hannel must have b een b roken u p b efore t he N otitia's c hapter X XVIII was w ritten . C arausius n o d oubt h eld t he a rea l ater c ontrolled b y t he c omes ( dux) l itoris S axonici
t hough h e m ay n ot h ave h eld e ither o f
c ommand i n t he
N otitia
c ould
r epresent
f ollowing a p resumed r eorganisation o f
1 37
t hese
t he s ituation
t itles .
T he
a fter A D 3 67 ,
t he s ystem b y T heodosius .
T he c ommand o f t he d ux B ritanniarum i s m ore p roblematical t han t he o ther B ritish c ommands . Whereas t he o ther t wo c ommands a re g enerally a ccepted a s r epresenting t he s ituation a t o ne p eriod i n t ime, t he d ux c ommand h as b een t hought b y s ome t o c ontain t wo s trata o f i nformation o f widely d iffering d ates. I n O c. X L, t wo p arts t o t he c ommand a re n oted . I n t he f irst p art t here a re f ourteen f orts which w ould s eem t o l ie i n n orth-east B ritain b etween S outh S hields a nd D oncaster . T he s econd p art i s l isted u nder t he t itle ' item p er , l ineam v alli' a nd c ontains a l ist o f 2 3 f orts r unning f rom W allsend o n t he T yne, a long t he Wall , a nd i ncludes s ome s ites i n t he n orth-west o f s outh a s R ibchester .
B ritain a s
A ll t he u nits r ecorded i n t he f irst p art o f t he c hapter e quites; t hese a re s tandard f ourth-century u nits . I n l ineam v alli' s ubsection , m ost o f t he u nits a re a lae which w ere o riginally r ecruited i n t he e arly Empire . t o f ind s uch N otitia, b ut A rmeniae ( Q r , many o f t hese emperors .
f ar
a re n umeri o r t he ' item p er a nd c ohortes I t i s u nusual
a c oncentration o f ' old-style' u nits p reserved i n t he i t i s n ot u nknown . Most o f t he u nits u nder t he d ux c h . X XXVIII) f or i nstance a re a lae a nd c ohortes, t hough b ear t itles b estowed b y l ate t hird a nd f ourth c entury
J ones b elieves t hat t he a rmies o f t he e astern f rontier,
f rom T hebaid t o A rmenia, a nd t hose o f B ritain, S pain and T ingitana, r emain i n t he N otitia much a s D iocletian l eft t hem ( Jones A . 1 973, 1 427) . T he Wall s ubsection i s v ery u nusual i n n ot h aving u nits n amed a fter l ate e mperors . I t
has
o ften
H erculaea , o f
t he
b een
c laimed
t hat
t he
u nit
m ust b e n amed a fter Maximianus
u nits
with
a t
O lenacum,
t he
a la
( emperor A D 2 86-305) .
t he t itle H erculaea were n o d oubt
I
M any
r aised u nder t he
T etrachy b ut t hey n eed n ot a ll h ave b een . G illam b elieves t hat t he a la m ay h ave b een n amed a fter C ommodus who , l ike M aximianus , e quated h imself with H ercules ( Gillam 1 974A ) . Many o f t hese n ames, c ould b e b attle h onours o f a ny d ate ( Roxan 1 976, 5 9). T hracum H erculiana i s r ecorded o n a c onsole ( ILS 8 869) f rom
h owever , T he a la t he w est
p ortico o f t he T emple o f B el a t P almyra . T his m entions t he y ear A D 1 67 . A s t his a la i s k nown t o h ave m oved t o C optos b y A D 1 85 , we h ave here c lear e vidence o f a u nit with a H erculian t itle b efore t he t etrachy ( Richmond 1 963, 5 0). I LS 1 327 r ecords a n a la H erculana i n t he l ate s econd c entury . T he u nit a t A ballaba , t he n umerus Maurorum A urelianorum i s n ow k nown t o h ave r eceived i ts t itle b efore A urelian . I t m ust h ave r eceived i t f rom Marcus A urelius o r o ne o f h is i mmediate s uccessors
( RIB
2 042).
I t h as g enerally b een a ccepted t hat t he ' item p er l ineam valli' s ubsection d oes n ot d ate t o c irca A D 3 95, t he d ate t o which t he o ther B ritish c ommands c ould b elong .
T he d egree o f o bsolescence o f t he
s ubsection has b een a rrived a t b y a c onsideration o f t he p resumed history o f t he n orthern f rontier i n t he t hird a nd f ourth c enturies. T he a ll
Wall p eriods a s r eplacing
f ormulated b y C ollingwood i n 1 930 were a ccepted b y t hose w orked o ut f rom t he e xcavations a t M ilecastle
4 8 b y G ibson a nd S impson i n 1 911. T heir p eriods h ad b een b ased o n t he n umismatic e vidence f rom t hat s ite . T he B irdoswald p eriods w ere t aken b y a ll t o r eflect t he history o f t he whole Wall . o nwards,
F rom
1 930
C ollingwood b elieved t hat t here h ad b een t hree o ccasions w hen
t he Wall had b een o verrun; i n A D 1 97, 2 96 a nd 3 67 . E ach o ne o f t hese i nvasions was t hought t o h ave i nvolved t he whole o f n orthern B ritain i n widespread d estruction .
1 38
T he
m ost
c atastrophic i nvasion
was held t o h ave b een t hat o f A D 3 67 when Ammianus r ecords t hat t he p rovinces o f B ritain were a ttacked b y a ' barbarica c onspiratio' a nd a lmost t otally o verrun ( A .M. XXVII, 8 ). I t was t hus b elieved t hat t he g arrisons o n H adrian's Wall , which a re r ecorded e pigraphically i n t he t hird c entury , c ould n ot h ave s urvived i ntact t o r eturn t o t heir p osts . I t was h ence n ecessary t o d ate t he Wall s ubsection t o b efore A D 3 67. T here i s, h owever, v irtually n o e vidence t o s uggest a d estruction o f t he Wall i n A D 3 67 . I f t he a ttacks were a s widespread a s Ammianus would h ave u s b elieve, t hen t he Wall must h ave b een b yp assed , t he P icts p erhaps s ailing r ound t he e astern f lank . T here i s n o r eason why t he u nits i n g arrison i n t he e arlier f ourth c entury c ould n ot h ave r emained o n t he Wall u ntil t he e nd o f t he R oman p eriod . T hat
t he W all s ubsection r ecords b asically
t hird
c entury
s ection o f
was
n oted b y Mommsen .
t he o rder o f b attle i n t he
W here
s ites
t he N otitia a re k nown o n t he g round,
m entioned
i n
t his
t here i s a d irect
c orrelation between t he t hird c entury g arrisons a ttested e pigraphically a nd t hose r ecorded i n t he N otitia, i f we a llow t he e mendation o f t he N otitia's c ohors I Austurum f or t he a ttested g arrison o f G reat C heaters, t he c ohors I I A usturum, a nd a ccept t hat A xelodunum ( thought b y s ome s cholars t o b e t he s ame a s t he U xelodunum o f t he R udge c up a nd Amiens p atera) r efers t o Netherby. B irley s uggested t hat t he emendation o f c ohors I A sturum i s u nnecessary a s t here i s e vidence f or a c ohort o f t hat n ame i n B ritain d uring t he t hird c entury ( ILS 2 767) a nd t he N otitia s hows a c ohors I I A sturum a t B usiris i n E gypt ( Birley E . 1 953, 1 3). T here c ould, h owever, have b een two c ohortes I I A sturum i n e xistence ( Roxan 1 976, 6 4). T he p roblem o f a ssigning n ames
t o t he f orts t owards t he western e nd o f t he
Wall u sing t he e vidence f rom t he N otitia a nd t hat p rovided b y t he R udge c up a nd Amiens p atera h as r ecently b een d iscussed b y H assall w ho h as p rovided a p artial s olution ( Hassall 1 976 , 1 13) . T he whereabouts o f Axelodunum i s, h owever, s till unclear . T he N otitia a ssigns t he c ohors I Hispanorum t o Axelodunum; t his unit i s a ttested e pigraphically a t N etherby, o nce i n A D 2 13 a nd twice i n A D 2 22. I t i s n ot a ttested e lsewhere i n t he t hird c entury; t here i s n o e vidence f or t he c ohort h aving moved f rom N etherby t o B owness o n S olway ( cf. R ivet a nd Smith 1 979, 2 21). N etherby i s k nown t o h ave b een c alled C astra E xploratorum - a n ame d erived f rom a t hird-century o r l ater s tyle o f u nit .
T here i s n o r eason why i t c ould n ot e arlier h ave b een
c alled A xelodunum
( cf .
B reeze a nd D obson
1 976 ,
2 75) .
I t has b een t hought t hat t he O lenacum o f t he N otitia i s t he f ort a t O ld C arlisle which i s k nown t o h ave b een g arrisoned , a t l east i n t he l ate s econd a nd e arly t hird c enturies, b y t he a la Augusta . A t O lenacum i n t he N otitia i s w as O ld C arlisle , h owever , t hat
R IB
8 99
f rom
O ld
p laced t he a la H erculaea . T hat O lenacum i s v ery u nlikely . H assall h as s uggested
C arlisle
r ecords
t he
n ame
o f
t he
f ort
a s
Säg .—.% T his h as p reviously b een i nterpreted a s kildIstrl , b ut o n a nalogy with t he v icani i nscription f rom C hesterholm, R IB 1 700, M ag . . . .
s hould
i ndicate
t he
f ort's
n ame
( Hassall
1 976 ,
1 11) .
G illam b elieves t hat t his o rder o f b attle d ates b ack t o t he t ime o f C ommodus a nd r epresents t he r eorganisation o f t he Wall a nd i ts h interland b y U lpius M arcellus f ollowing o n h is d efeat o f t he n orthern t ribes w ho h ad i nvaded t he p rovince e arly i n C ommodus' r eign ( Dio 7 2 , 8 ). T his i s n ot e asy t o p rove; u nits which a re known t o b e i n a p articular f ort u nder C ommodus a nd i n t he t hird c entury a re r are d ue
1 39
t o t he d earth o f
i nscriptions o f C ommodus,
p robably r esulting f rom h is
d amnatio m emoriae . A t C hesters a nd O ld C arlisle , t he s ame u nit d id r emain i n o ccupation . T here was n ever a ny n eed t o i nvent a nother g overnor n amed U lpius Marcellus ( Birley E . 1 939) . 1 464 m ust d ate t o C ommodus' r eign ( Jarrett 1 978 ) .
H ence R IB 1 463 a nd A t S outh S hields
t here was a c hange o f g arrison b ut t his c ould h ave b een a s pecial c ase c onnected with t he c onversion o f t he f ort i nto a s upply b ase f or S everus' S cottish c ampaigns . An i nscription f ound a t Newcastle i n 1 979 c asts d oubts o n G illam's i nterpretation . u p i n A D 2 13 b y Imperial H ouse . C ugernorum . C ornoviorum
T he i nscription would s eem t o b e o ne o f a n umber s et t he a rmy i n B ritain r ecording i ts l oyalty t o t he I t was e rected b y t he c ohors I U lpia T raiana
T he u nit r ecorded h ere i n t he N otitia was ( Daniels a nd H arbottle 1 980).
t he c ohors I
T he Wall s ubsection c annot b e e arlier t han C ommodus a s t here i s a c hange o f u nit k nown a t B enwell b etween Marcus A urelius a nd C ommodus . T he S armatians a t R ibchester p robably o nly a rrived a fter A D 1 75. G illam d ates u nlikely
t hat
t he W all s ubsection t o t he r eign o f C ommodus a s i t s eems t he
t itle
d amnatio m emoriae .
H erculaea
c ould h ave
s urvived
I f i t was a b attle h onour ,
t hat
h owever ,
e mperor's
i t n eed h ave
n o c onnection with C ommodus. T he d ating o f t he s ubsection t o t he p eriod c irca A D 1 84 t o 1 97 c ould e xplain why t he o utposts, e xcept p erhaps Netherby, were n ot i ncluded i n t he l ist . C ommodus may h ave g iven u p m ost o f t he o utposts - a n umber w ere c ertainly h eld f or o f t he t hird a nd p art o f t he f ourth c enturies.
m uch
T he d ating o f t he ' item p er l ineam v alli' s ubsection s o e arly h as m et with much o pposition . I t would s eem l udicrous t o s uggest t hat a d ocument o f s uch a ge c ould s till b e u sed i n t he l ate f ourth c entury; b ut w hatever d ate i s p ut o n t he s ubsection , i t i s g enerally a greed t o h ave b een o ut O nce
o f
d ate .
o ne a ccepts
t hat
i t
was
o bsolete,
i t
i s n ot v ery s ignificant
whether i t b e b y 4 0 o r 2 00 y ears. I t i s p ossible t hat t he o utposts were held when t he l ist was d rawn u p, b ut t hat f or s ome r eason t hey were omitted . S ome o ther f orts t owards t he w estern e nd o f t he W all a nd i n t he n orth west o f B ritain were a lso omitted, t hough t hey a re n ot k nown t o h ave b een a bandoned a t t his t ime .
F rere m aintains area
i n
t he
t hat
t he s ubsection r eflects
period
AD
2 96-367,
but
t he s ituation i n t he W all
his
explanation
o f
t he
a rchaeological e vidence f rom R udchester a nd H altonchesters i s n ot v ery s atisfactory . H e b elieves t hat a s a ll t he c ohorts i n t he s ubsection a re c ommanded b y t ribuni, t his m ust d ate t o t he f ourth c entury . I n t he e arlier Empire, t ribuni h ad o nly c ommanded milliary c ohorts, q uingenary c ohorts b eing c ommanded b y p raefecti . I t i s b y n o m eans c lear, h owever, when t hese c ommands were a ltered . T he c hange m ay d ate t o a ny t ime a fter t he m id-third c entury . A lso, i t i s p erhaps p ossible t hat t he s cribe who c opied o ut t he Wall s ubsection f or t he N otitia c hanged t he c ohort c ommander's t itle t o f it i n with t he c urrent u sage - i t would h elp t o make t he l ist l ook more u p t o d ate a nd c ould e asily b e d one . C harlesworth b elieves t hat t he c ohors I T ungrorum had l eft H ousesteads b y t he e arly t hird c entury, b eing r eplaced f irst b y v exillations o f t he I I a nd V I l egions, a nd l ater b y
1 40
t he n umerus 2 8). I am o f
H naudifridi
a nd
t he
c uneus
F risiorum
( Charlesworth
1 975 ,
t he o pinion t hat t he W all s ubsection m ust d ate t o s ome p eriod
b etween c irca A D 2 13 a nd 2 80 . I t i s n ot p ossible t o d ate i t l ater a s i t would t hen d isagree with t he a rchaeological e vidence n ow a ccumulating f or a p artial a bandonment o f t he W all i n t he l ate t hird c entury . W hen i t was t hought t hat t he Wall was c rossed i n A D 2 96 a s a r esult o f Allectus' d enuding o f t he g arrisons t o f ight a gainst C onstantius i n t he s outh , i t was p ostulated t hat t he f ighting h ad n ot b een heavy, a nd t hat t he units had b een r apidly r eturned t o t heir p osts which t hey h ad o ccupied s ince t he t ime o f S everus. T his i n i tself was n ot a v ery s atisfactory s olution . G illam i n 1 949 had f ound t his u nacceptable a nd had d ated t he s ubsection t o t he t hird c entury b efore t he r eorganisation u nder t he
t etrachy .
T he a rchaeological e vidence b rought t o l ight o ver t he l ast 2 0 y ears i s, h owever , a ltering t his p icture . T here s eems t o b e n o e vidence o f v iolent e nemy d estruction a t a ny f ort i n t he n orth o f E ngland t hat c an b e a ssociated with t his i nvasion . B ewcastle c ould b e a n e xception i t may have b een v iolently d estroyed i n t he l ate t hird c entury ( Richmond, H odgson a nd S t. J oseph 1 938, 2 08-9). T here i s e vidence f rom a n umber o f f orts o n Hadrian's Wall t hat t hey were g iven u p a t s ome d ate a fter A D 2 73 . T he a rchaeological e vidence f or t his i s d iscussed i n d etail i n c hapter 3 ; h ere i t will s uffice t o b riefly m ention t he f orts t hought t o h ave b een u noccupied a t t his t ime . T he i nscription R IB 1 912 f rom B irdoswald , i f t aken l iterally , i mplies a n a bandonment o f a t l east t he m ain a dministrative b uilding o f
t he f ort;
i t c ould i mply t he t otal a bandonment o f t he s ite b y t he m ilitary . A t H altonchesters a nd R udchester, t he t hird-century b uildings where e xcavated were f ound t o have b een i n a c ompletely r uined s tate a nd were o verlain b y a t hick l ayer o f d ark e arth . H altonchesters would s eem t o have l ain d eserted f or a bout 1 00 years. T he d ark s oil was o verlain b y b uildings
o f
c irca A D
3 70 .
A t R udchester ,
t he s ituation
c ould be s imilar . A t N ewcastle, t he p eriod o f a pparent a bandonment was a gain n oted , t hough i t s eems h ere t o b e c onfined t o t he l ate t hird c entury . S outh S hields was g iven o ver t o c ivilian u se a t t his t ime . I t i s n ot c lear w hen i t was r eoccupied b y t he m ilitary , b ut a s a u nit i s r ecorded h ere i n t he f irst p art o f t he d ux c ommand, i t c ould h ave b een r eoccupied b efore A D
3 67 .
I f ind i t impossible t o b elieve t hat, a t l east a t R udchester a nd H altonchesters, t he s ame units c ould have r eturned t o t hese f orts a fter a n a bandonment o f c irca t wo d ecades would b e u nlikely
1 00 y ears . t o r eceive
E ven a f ort a bandoned f or t he o riginal g arrison b ack .
Unfortunately, i t i s v ery d ifficult t o prove t hat a p articular f ort was t otally a bandoned . I t c an b e a rgued t hat t he f ort m ay s till h ave b een held b y a small f orce a round which t he u nit was r eformed b y C onstantius. O nly t he c omplete e xcavation o f a f ort, i f t he a rchaeological r ecord i s well e nough p reserved , w ill a llow o f p roof . T he r arity o f t he u sually c ommon c oins o f C arausius a nd A llectus f rom t he Wall i s s trong , p resumptive e vidence f or a l ack o f t roops o n t he f rontier. B ritain
i n
t he
t hird
While t he r est o f b arbarian i nvasion ,
c entury
s eems
t he Empire t here s eems
1 41
t o h ave
b een
r emarkably
p eaceful .
was t orn a sunder b y c ivil war t o h ave b een n o t rouble whatever ,
o r a t
l east i n n orthern B ritain . c ircumstances o f
t roops
I t i s o nly t o b e e xpected t hat i n t hese
t he a rmy o f B ritannia I nferior would b e h eavily
t o
f ight
o n
t he
Continent.
Many
o f
t hese
d enuded
c ould
have
p erished; witness t he a bsence o f c ohortes a nd a lae o n t he R hine a nd D anube
f rontiers
i n
t he N otitia
i n t he t hird c entury .
where
S ome u nits
t he h eaviest
f ighting
o ccurred
may h ave b een i ncorporatd i nto
t he
a rmies o f o ther provinces. T here i s n o e vidence i n t he N otitia f or B ritish c ohortes a nd a lae o n t he C ontinent. Only a f ew units o f p robably
f ourth
Britain, b eing
c entury
a re f ound .
u sed
d ate,
w hich h ad a t o ne t ime b een s tationed i n
We d o know,
o utside
t he
i sland
however,
i n
t he
o f
t hird
t roops f rom B ritain
c entury.
I n AD
l egionary v exillations a nd t heir a uxiliaries were d rawn t o g ive a id i n t he G erman c ampaigns o f G allienus. r ecorded a t Mainz i n A D 2 55 a ccompanied
t he
n ever
r eturned
have
e mperor
P ostumus' G allic
units
H ousesteads, many o f
t o
( CIL X III, P annonia
B ritain
Empire .
t he Wall g arrisons, i rregular
t o
6 7,80).
( ILS
5 46 )
b y
t hen
a s
Mann b elieves
T hese t roops i n A D d rafts
t heir p lace b eing f illed b y r ecorded
on
l ater
T hey was
will
part
o f
were t aken f rom
t he n umeri,
t hird-century
G reat C hesters a nd R isingham .
2 60 .
B ritain
t hat
2 55,
f rom B ritain L egio XX i s
c unei
inscriptions
a nd
f rom
G illam h as s uggested t hat
t he t roops f rom t he Wall would h ave b een n eeded t o man t he
n ewly-built
S axon
S hore
f orts
i n
t he p ostulated a bandonment o f
t he
A D
s ome o f
2 80s;
i .e .
c ontemporary
t he Wall f orts .
with
E arlier i n t he
c entury R eculver a nd B rancaster h ad b een g arrisoned b y u nits which h ad p reviously
b een
Baetasiorum Aurelius;
p art
was
c ohors
B rough-on-Noe,
o f
l ast
t he
i n
t hat
C ohors
Maryport
r ecorded
i n
t he
t ime
l egatus
o f
l egionis
t he t hird c entury
f or
H adrian .
o f
omissions
T he
t he V I
( Birley A . 1 971,
t aken s eparately , h owever ,
M .
t he n orth
a t
c aused p erhaps
a rea
c overed
t he c ontrol o f V ictrix )
9 0).
o f
i s
p resumably
t he g overnor
B ritannia
o ther
d uces
( who
I nferior
i n
T he two parts o f c hapter X L
T he
1 4 u nits r ecorded i n t he f irst p art
o f t he d ux l ist ( these a re t he o nly o nes s hown o n his i nsignia; o f
b y
make n o s ense a s o ne c an n ever h ave e xisted
i n i solation f rom t he o ther . i nsignia
I
under
i s b asically t he s ystem o f d efence t hat h ad b een i n
which h ad b een p reviously u nder
was a lso
l ast
a t
t he d ux B ritanniarum a s a whole makes a r easonably I t
o peration f rom
n orthern B ritain . n orth
1 58 .
c oherent d efensive s ystem ( allowing c arelessness) .
o f
t he
I A quitanorum was
c irca A D
T he c ommand o f
g arrison
r ecorded
d o
n ot
i nclude
a ll
t he f orts
u nder
t he t heir
c ommand) c ould n ot r epresent a s tage i n t he R oman's withdrawal f rom t he n orth a fter t he Wall h ad b een a bandoned . I t d oes g uard t he r oad f rom t he n orth-west over S tainmore, a nd t he r oad f rom t he n orth a nd C orbridge, b ut none o f t he s ites s o f ar i dentified l ies o n t he west s ide
o f
t he
e xclusive;
c ountry.
s ignificant g aps. h ave
b een
B oth
p arts
o f
n owhere d o t hey o verlap, O ld C arlisle
t he Magis o r Maglona o f
i f
t he
c hapter
a re
mutually
nor d o t here a ppear t o b e a ny i t
was
c alled Mag....
t he d ux c ommand .
n eed n ot
T he a rea c overed
b y t he Wall s ubsection must have b een c ontained i n a f ourth-century l ist, b ut
t he c omplementary s heet t o t he f irst p art o f t he d ux c ommand,
t his was
s heet.
d isplaced o n t he i nsertion o f
F rere s uggests
r ecorded
i n
g entiles
u nder
t he
C hapter X LII o f
Wall
t hat
s ubsection b ecause
p raefecti
i ndependent
t he N otitia which
western p rovinces
t he ' item p er
l ineam v alli'
t he l ate f ourth-century units a re n ot t hey
f rom
l ists
t he
m ay b reak o ff b efore i t
1 42
may
t he
h ave
d ux
b een
( Frere
l aeti a nd
l aeti 1 978 ,
g entiles
r eaches B ritain .
o f
a nd 2 67). t he
Mann will n ot a ccept t hat t he t wo p arts o f t he d ux c ommand a re o f d ifferent d ates . H e n otes t hat i t i s n ot p ossible t o a rgue t hat t he u nits i n t he h interland f orts were d estroyed b y e nemy a ction i n t he l ate t hird c entury i f t he g arrison o f H adrian's Wall r emained u nscathed .
T herefore ,
h e
s uggests
t hat
t he
f orts
i n
t he
f irst
p art
o f c hapter X L were e vacuated d uring t he t hird c entury; t his would h ave t o b e l ater t han t he G ordianic i nscription f rom L anchester R IB 1 091 and t he s tone o f P hillipan d ate f rom O ld P enrith R IB s uggests
t hat
t he Wall a nd
9 15 .
H e
t he u nits r emoved f rom t hese f orts w ere d isbanded while t he w est
c oast
d efences were r etained w hich ,
i n
i tself,
would s eem u nlikely . During t he t hird c entury t he R oman a rmy was f ully s tretched . I t would m ake m uch m ore s ense t o s uggest t hat t hese u nits were m oved o ut t o r einforce t he C ontinental a rmies o r t o g arrison t he n ew S axon S hore d efences .
U nder C onstantius
C hlorus
o r
C onstantine , w hen t here h ad b een t rouble i n t he n orth , t he h interland was s trengthened a nd n ew u nits were b rought i nto t he n orth-east t o p rovide a m obile r eserve f or t he Wall
( Mann
1 974 ,
2 32; D obson
1 968-70 ,
3 5). Mann's
a ttempt
t o r ationalise t he d ux c ommand a s p reserved i n t he
N otitia t akes n o a ccount o f t he a rchaeological e vidence f or a t l east a p artial a bandonment o f t he W all , o r f rom t he h interland . T he f ort a t P iercebridge a ppears t o have b een b uilt i n t he mid-third c entury ( Casey 1 978, 1 90) r ather t han a s had b een p reviously t hought, u nder C onstantius ( Piercebridge i s g enerally t hought t o b e e ither t he Magis o r Maglona o f
c hapter X L).
F rom s ome o f
t he n orth-eastern f orts
t here i s n o e vidence a t p resent t o imply a bandonment . I f
Mann 's
t hesis
i s
a ccepted,
t here
i s a lso t he p roblem a s
t o w hy t he
n orth-west was n ot t reated i n t he s ame way . H e s ees t he r etention o f t he C umbrian c oast f orts a nd t he f orts f urther s outh a s b eing p erhaps a r esponse t o I rish s ea r aiders w ho c ould h ave b egun t heir a ctivities d uring t he t hird c entury, t hough whether s ites l ike B ainbridge a nd R ibchester u nlikely. o ccur ,
would b e h eld t o c ombat t his t hreat i s, t o m y mind, S ome r eduction o f t he h interland g arrisons n o d oubt d id
b ut n ot o n t he s cale
t hat
would h ave n ecessitated t he b ringing
i n o f 1 3 n ew u nits i nto t he n orth e ast, while t he Wall was h eld i n s trength . T he s etting u p o f t he C ivitas C arvetiorum a t s ome d ate i n t he t hird c entury, r ecorded o n a m ilestone f rom B rougham ( JRS L V , 2 24 ) may imply t hat t he a rea was c onsidered s ecure a nd c ould b e h anded o ver t o c ivilian a dministration .
T he f orts a t O ld P enrith a nd B rougham
would s eem t o h ave l ain i n C arvetian t erritory; t hey may have b een a bandoned a t t his t ime ( neither s ite i s mentioned i n t he d ux l ist). Mann h as n ot s uggested a ny r eason why t he n orth-west h interland o f t he Wall s hould n ot h ave b een h eavily r einforced i n t he e arly f ourth c entury a s h e b elieves
t he n orth
e ast was .
T he f irst p art o f t he d ux c ommand r ecords o ne u nit n amed a fter C rispus who w as C aesar A D 3 17-26 . A ccording t o Mann , t his s uggests t hat t he units were e stablished i n t he n orth-east h interland b efore, r ather t han a fter A D 3 26 , t hough why t his s hould b e s o i s u nclear . C rispus d oes n ot s eem t o h ave s uffered d amnatio m emoriae . H ence, t he e quites C rispiani a nd t he f irst p art o f t he d ux c ommand c ould d ate l ater t han AD 3 26, t hough i t may d ate t o t his p eriod . D uces a re o ccasionally s een u nder D iocletian ; b y t he d eath o f C onstantine t hey s eem t o h ave become v irtually u niversal. T he d ux B ritanniarum i s mentioned b y Ammianus i n h is a ccount o f t he y ear A D 3 67 .
1 43
p robably T he d ux
c ommand was n ot i n e xistence when t he r ebuilding a t B irdoswald was i n p rogress u nder Diocletian . The praeses, Aurelius Arpagius, i s r ecorded a s I t
would
b eing
b e
i n c harge
r easonable
o f
t o
t he work
a ssume
( RIB
t hat
1 912) .
t he
i nitiation
o f
t he
d ux
c ommand a nd t he b ringing o f n ew u nits i nto t he a rea were c ontemporary . T here i s a p roblem , h owever , with t he u nit p laced a t D erventio : t his s ite c ould e ither b e Malton o r P apcastle ( both s ites b eing o n a r iver D erwent)
but
P etuaria
a s
t he
unit
i n
( Brough-on-Humber),
Notitia .
g arrison
Malton
i s
b ears
a n ame
p robably
f rom
o f
t he
Wacher s uggests t hat t he unit s tationed a t Derventio i n
c hapter X L,
t he n umerus s upervenientium P etuariensium,
b een s tationed a t
B rough
Malton when Brough
f or a l ong p eriod a nd
s eems
was
had o riginally
p robably
m oved
t o
t o have b een a bandoned a s a naval b ase -
perhaps b y T heodosius i n AD 3 67-8 ( Wacher 1 969, o f
d erived
t he D erventio
4 ).
The f irst part
t he d ux l ist i n i ts f inal f orm may d ate t o a fter A D
3 67 .
I n t he excavations a t Malton by C order a nd K irk f rom 1 927 t o 1 930, s eries o f
a
i nternal b uildings were r ecorded i n t he n orthern p art o f t he
s ite which ,
f rom t he d escription
o f t he a rea c ertainly
t he
buildings
( Corder
1 932) a nd t he o ne e xtant p lan
( at p resent l odged i n t he Yorkshire Museum) t ype
have
C aernarvon .
o f
b uildings
been
noted
Where
d ated,
k nown
on
and
t hey
a s
c halets
( fig .
near Hadrian's
prove
t o
b e
o f
a re a lmost
4 4 .3) .
T hese
Wall
t he
and
early
at
f ourth
c entury and s eem t o have r emained i n u se until t he end o f t he o ccupation o f t hose f orts . T hey r epresent t he t roop a ccommodation within t hese l ate f orts. l iving
i n
t he
o rganisation U nfortunately, t he
e arly
s ame
a nd
I t i s l egitimate t o s uggest t hat t roops
t ype
o f
s tatus,
a ccommodation
i .e.
b elong
t o
would
u nits
have t he
t he
s ame
same
t ype .
we d o n ot k now which u nit was i n g arrison a t Malton i n
f ourth
c entury.
According
t o
Mann's
s hould h ave r emained u noccupied f rom s ome p eriod until t he i nstitution o f t he d ux c ommand. h owever ,
o f
t hesis,
i n t he
t he
f ort
t hird c entury
T he c halets a t Malton,
were d ated t o t he t ime o f C onstantius b y t he e xcavators w hich
w ould m ake t hem c ontemporary with m any o f
t he o ther c halets .
E ither
a c ohort o r a la was p resent a t Malton i n t he e arly f ourth c entury , t o be l ater r eplaced b y a numerus, o r t here were n umeri f orming t he g arrison o f s ome f orts o n o r n ear t he Wall . Did Malton h ave a numerus i n g arrison i n t he e arly f ourth c entury which was l ater r eplaced b y t he u nit f rom B rough-on-Humber? There'is n o mention o f a ny f ort held i n t he west o r Wales s outh west o f
Ribchester
c eased
t o
i n
t he Notitia .
b e g arrisoned b y
I t was
a lways
r egular R oman t roops
a ssumed u nder
t hat
Magnus
Wales
Maximus
a nd t hat h e may a lso h ave r emoved t he X X L egion f rom C hester .
I t h as
b een
W ales;
s uggested
t hat
Maximus
m ust
h ave
h ad
s ome
d ealings
with
he i s r emembered i n Welsh f olk l ore a s Maxen Wledig and c onnected s pecifically p alatina
i n
with
C aernarvon .
I llyricum
i s
a u nit
I n t he N otitia among o f
S eguntienses
which
t he
was
a uxilia
p robably
a
f ormer g arrison o f C aernarvon ( Segontium) t hat h ad b een u pgraded i nto t he f ield a rmy a nd n ever r eturned t o Wales . S ome h ave s uggested t hat Maximus' f orce was b uilt a round t he XX L egion a nd i ncluded t he t roops o f Wales and t he western B ritish p rovinces, i .e . a ll t he f ort g arrisons f rom t hose a reas n ot n oted i n t he N otitia . T here i s n ow, however, n umismatic evidence t o i ndicate t hat C aernarvon was h eld a fter Maximus. I t i s s urprising t hat we h ear n othing o f t he XX L egion i f i t was t aken t o t he C ontinent -
1 44
n o u nits f ormed f rom i t
( or
f rom t he V I V ictrix) a re k nown . G illam s uggests t hat we h ave s imply l ost t he N otitia c hapter o n t he western c ommand ( see c hapter 8 ). I believe t hat t he Notitia O c.
c hapters XXVIII,
c hapter V II r eferring t o B ritain d o n ot B ritish e xisted
p rovinces
a t
a ny
o ne
d ate .
c ontemporaneously,
b ut
t he
All
p erhaps
o ccupying
i n
o f
t he
s ome
a ll
t hose n ot
c ohortes
a nd
t he
f orts
n oted
a lae
o f
t he
' item
t he
a rmy
c ommands
l ineam
i n
may
t he h ave
v alli' s ubsection
t hough t here were s till t roops
n oted
i n i t .
t hree
' item p er
was by t he AD 3 90s l ong o ut o f d ate,
X L a nd t he p arts o f
r epresent
I t p er
i n
t he
s ubsection
a nd
p robably
i s q uite p ossible t hat s ome o f l ineam
v ai n .'
s ubsection
w ere
s till i n t he s ame f orts, b ut I d o n ot b elieve t hat a ll o f t hem c ould s till h ave b een
t here .
1 45
C HAPTER 1 0
T HE F UNCTION O F T OWNS I N T HE M ILITARY D EFENCE O F T HE B RITISH D IOCESE
T he h istory
o f
B ritish
t own d efences
i s
m arkedly
d ifferent f rom
t hat
o f s imilar t owns i n t he o ther n orth-western p rovinces. I n t hese C ontinental p rovinceb f ew t owns h ad b een d efended i n t he t he f irst a nd s econd c enturies. A n umber o f t he Augustan c olonies i n C isalpine G aul, P rovence a nd S pain had b een g iven s tone d efences i n t he e arly f irst c entury , a s h ad A utun , p ossibly R heims a nd t he C laudian c olony o f K öln o n i ts f oundation i n A D 5 0 . T he g reat s pate o f t own wall b uilding - e specially i n G aul - d ates t o t he l ater t hird c entury a nd r esulted f rom t he d evastations wrought b y t he b arbarians i n t he m idt hird c entury a nd p articularly i n t he i nvasions o f AD 2 75-6 which p enetrated d eep w ithin t he i mperial f rontiers . T hese l ate d efences a re t ypified b y t he small a rea t hey e nclose , o ften o nly t he m ost d efensible p art o f t he f ormer t own b eing i ncluded within t he walls . Major p ublic b uildings w ere o ften e ither l eft o utside t he d efences o r i ncorporated i nto t he c ircuit . M uch u se was m ade i n t he l ower p arts o f t hese walls o f r e-used masonry, t hough i t i s e vident t hat
i n many
c ases
t he walls were n ot h astily e rected
1 973 , 2 17; p rojecting
1 976A , f ig . t owers .
I n B ritain
a f ew
t owns
6 5) .
( Johnson J .
T he walls were i nvariably p rovided with
r eceived
d efences
i n t he f irst
c entury .
T he
c oloniae o f L incoln a nd G loucester u tilized t he l egionary f ortress d efences w ithin which t hey were e stablished . A s c oloniae i n r ecently p acified a reas, t hey s till p erformed a q uasi-military f unction ; t he f ate o f t he c olonia a t C olchester, where t he f ortress d efences were l evelled when t he c olonia was f ounded, c annot h ave b een e asily f orgotten .
i n t he B oudiccan r ebellion, E xeter a lso r etained i ts
l egionary d efences ( as Wroxeter may h ave d one) a nd B idwell s uggests t hat t his was b ecause t he t own was l iable t o a ttack a nd was a lso s trongly p hilo-Roman ( Bidwell 1 980 , 5 7) . C olchester was g iven a n ew s tone d efensive c ircuit a t s ome d ate b etween A D 9 0 a nd 1 50 . E arthen d efences o f f irst-century d ate a re k nown a t t he S ilchester a nd V erulamium ( Wacher 1 975A , 7 2) . Many t owns, d efences i n
t owns
o f
Winchester ,
b oth c ivitas c apitals a nd ' small t owns' were f irst g iven t he l ater s econd c entury a nd i t h as o ften b een s uggested
t hat t his p rogramme o f d efence was i nitiated b y C lodius A lbinus d uring h is r ule i n B ritain b etween A D 1 93 a nd 1 97 . T he t owns o f B ritain a re s o unusual i n b eing d efended a t t his t ime t hat t here must h ave b een s ome p urely
i nsular r eason f or t heir p rovision with d efences .
T here
i s n o e vidence t hat t he p rovince with i ts l arge a rmy o f o ccupation i n g arrison w as p articularly i n d anger f rom b arbarian i nvasion . A lbinus may have f eared t hat h is r emoval o f l arge n umbers o f t roops t o t he
1 46
C ontinent t o f ight f or t he p urple - which h e must h ave r ealised was i nevitable a fter S everus' p roclamation o f h is s on C aracalla a s C aesar i n A D 1 96 - would h ave l eft t he p rovince o pen t o b arbarian a ttack. T he small t own o f W ickford i n E ssex was e nclosed b y a n e arthwork w hich was
begun
l ate
i n
t he
s econd
c entury
a nd
n ever
c ompleted .
A t
C helmsford t he e arthen d efences o f l ate s econd-century d ate w ere o ut o f u se b y t he e arly t hird c entury ( Rodwell 1 975, 8 8). T hese s ites s uggest t hat t he d anger , whatever i ts c ause , was s hort-lived . L ondon s eems t o h ave b een d efended f or t he f irst t ime a t s ome d ate a fter A D 1 83 b y a s tone wall,
t he
c ircuit
i ncorporating
t he
e arly
s econd-
c entury f ort a t C ripplegate . M r . J . Maloney d ates t he L ondon W all t o b etween A D 1 90 a nd 2 10 . A s imilar d ate h as b een s uggested f or t he s tone d efences a t G reat C asterton, Alchester a nd C aistor-by-Norwich ( Bidwell 1 980, 6 6 f n . 5 0). D uring t he t hird c entury, many o f t he t owns which h ad b een d efended e arlier b y e arthen b anks w ere g iven s tone d efences c ut i nto t he f ront f ace o f t he p re-existing r ampart . D ating e vidence f or t his s trengthening o f t he d efences i s h ard t o f ind, b ut i t s eems t hat s tone walls were a dded t hroughout t he t hird c entury. l ater
t hird
c entury ,
C anterbury was
d efended
c oin o f P ostumus was s ealed b eneath 1 976A , 1 00) . P rofessor S . F rere d ates t o c irca A D 2 70 .
f or
t he
f irst
l ikely I n t he
t ime .
A
t he r ampart b ank ( Johnson J . t he s tone wall a t V erulamium
O f t he t owns f ortified d uring t he t hird c entury,
o nly t hose a t V erulamium a nd C aistor-by-Norwich m ay p ossibly h ave h ad e xternal t owers c ontemporary with t heir s tone walls ( cf F rere 1 978 , 2 99, fn . 1 8). T he f ortifications a t B rough-on-Humber were b egun i n s tone i n t he l ate t hird c entury a nd a fter a s hort h iatus i n t he w ork t hey were c ompleted i n t he e arly f ourth c entury with e xternal t owers ( Wacher 1 969, 3 ). T he small d efended e nclosures a t C aistor ( Lincs) a nd H orncastle h ave b een
c laimed
a s
f orts
a nd
a re
s een
a s
p art
o f
t he
S axon
S hore
d efensive s ystem , t hough t heir d istance f rom t he s ea s urely r enders t his e xplanation u nlikely . B oth s ites h ave e xternal t owers w hich a t H orncastle a re c ontemporary with t he wall a nd a re p robably s o a t C aistor . T his h as b een t hought t o s uggest t hat t hese s ites s hould b e t hought o f a s f orts r ather t han a s t owns - t owns were n ot u sually p rovided with p rojecting t owers u ntil well i nto t he f ourth c entury ( Todd 1 973,42-3). T he d ating o f t he d efences a t b oth s ites u nclear ( Hurst 1 969) . H orncastle h ad a c ontemporay r ampart b ank .
i s
I t i s k nown t hat a l icence t o c renelate f rom t he e mperor was n ecessary b efore d efences c ould b e b uilt. P resumably u nder A lbinus t his p ermission would have b een f orthcoming,
b ut whether a l icence was
n eeded t o p rovide a lready e xisting d efences w ith a s tone r evetment, i s n ot c lear . T he p rovison o f s uch s tone walls t o B ritish t owns t hroughout t he t hird c entury s uggests t hat p ossibly p ermission was n ot r equired . l east
T here s eems t o h ave b een n o r eal n eed t o f ortify t owns,
i n t he f irst h alf
o f
t he
c entury.
T he p resence o f
f orts
a t a t
B rancaster a nd R eculver a t s ome d ate - p erhaps i n t he e arlier t hird c entury - s hould i ndicate t hat t rouble f rom s ea r aiders was t o b e e xpected , t hird
y et C anterbury r emained w ithout a ny d efences u ntil t he l ater
c entury .
C aistor-by-Norwich
m ay h ave
r eceived
i ts
s tone
wall
l ate i n t he c entury ( Johnson J . 1 976A, 1 5). T he c ities o f G aul, which were u nder much g reater t hreat o f a ttack, were n ot d efended u ntil t he l ast q uarter o f t he c entury . F or a ll t he t hird c entury -
1 47
e xcept i n t he d ecade A D 2 86-296 - t hey were u nder t he s ame imperial c ontrol ,
b e i t t he I mperium G alliarum o r t he c entral g overnment .
Although
a ll
t he
c ivitas
c apitals were d efended b y A D 3 00,
' small
t owns' c ontinued t o b e p rovided with s tone d efences i nto t he s econd h alf o f t he f ourth c entury; M ildenhall , s o d efended a bout A D 3 60 , may b e t he l atest ( Wacher 1 975B, 5 1). N ot a ll ' small t owns' were d efended ; a s w ith c ivitas c apitals, t he d efences o f ' small t owns' d o not o n many s ites e nclose t he whole o f t he occupied a rea. S ettlements l eft o utide t he d efences o ften a ppear t o h ave f lourished w ell i nto t he f ourth c entury . A t C ambridge , c ontemporary with t he b uilding o f t he e arly f ourth-century walls, a 1 0-roomed v illa was built 1 miles o utside t he d efences ( Alexander 1 975, 1 08). S imilarly, a t G reat C asterton t here w as i ntensive b uilding a ctivity i n t he
e xtra-mural
e xternal
t owers
v illa
b roadly
t o t he t own's
c ontemporary
d efences
( Corder
with
t he
a ddition
1 961,
2 7,
5 9 ) .
o f
I n G aul, t he c ities which were f irst d efended b y t he emperor P robus ( he was c redited with t he r estoration o f 7 0 c ities) i n m ost c ases m ake n o a ttempt t o e nclose t he f ormerly o ccupied a rea . T hey p ossibly a cted a s c itadels ( i.e . r efuges within which t he t own's p eople c ould s helter
i n
t imes
o f
d anger)
o r
t hey
were
b uilt
j ust
t o
p rotect
o fficial b uildings e rected within t hem ( Johnson J . 1 976B). I t i s u nlikely t hat b y t he e nd o f t he t hird c entury a ll t he t owns i n G aul c omprised o nly t hat a rea within t heir n ew d efences . C ivil d efences i n B ritain , a lthough n ot i ncluding t he whole s ettled a rea w ithin t heir walls,
n ever
s howed
a marked
d esire
t o
s urround
o nly
t he
most
d efensible a rea . Even t owns d efended f or t he f irst t ime i n t he f ourth c entury a re o ften o f l arge s ize , f or e xample , C ambridge 1 0 h a , M ildenhall o ver 6 h a a nd G reat C hesterford 1 4 .5 h a . N or i s t here a ny t race o f s mall, d efended a reas b eing c reated w ithin l arge , e arly w all c ircuits, T ongres
a s h appned f or e xample a t A rles,
a nd V ienne
( Johnson J .
1 977 ,
A utun, Avenches,
N imes,
6 8 ) .
What was t he p urpose o f d efences a round a c ivil s ite? O bviously d efence w ould s eem t o b e o f p aramount i mportance , y et a t C olchester i n t he m id-first c entury t he d efences o f t he l egionary f ortress w ere s oon d ispensed with - o bviously t hey were c onsidered u nnecessary - b ut mistakenly a s i t t urned o ut. T he d efences o f Winchester a nd S ilchester i n t he f irst c entury h ave b een p urported t o r eflect t he p ossibly a nomalous s tatus o f t hese t owns which were u nder t he c ontrol o f t he c lient k ing C ogidubnus . V erulamium may h ave r eceived i ts C laudian d efences
a s
a m ark o f
i ts
s tatus
a s
a m unicipium .
T he
r e-
u se o f t he l egionary d efences a t L incoln a nd G loucester m ay a gain r eflect m ore t heir p rivileged s tatus a s c oloniae , a s m ay t he p rovision o f n ew s tone d efences a t t he c olonia a nd p rovincial c apital o f C olchester . D efensive n eeds w ill a ccount f or t he b uilding o f e arthen r amparts i n t he l ater s econd c entury; c ivic p ride c ould e xplain t he b uilding o f g ateways i n s tone a t S ilchester a nd V erulamium a nd t he p resence o f t he s tone w all a t L ondon w hich w as b y t hat d ate t he m ost important c ity i n B ritain . T he r ebuilding o f d efences i n s tone d uring t he t hird c entury may h ave b een a s m uch f or e conomic a s f or d efensive r easons . A lthough t he i nitial c ost o f a s tone w all would b e m uch g reater t han t hat o f a n e arth r ampart ,
i t w ould r equire l ittle
maintenance . B y t he f ourth c entury e arthen d efences were r arely u sed a nd t hen o nly f or u nimportant o r s mall p osts .
1 48
I n t he f ourth c entury, c ivil d efences were t aken v ery s eriously b y t he emperors. V alentinian I r eturned a p ortion o f c ity r evenues t o b e s pent o n b uilding d efences . V ery h eavy p enalties were m eted o ut t o s tate o fficials who f ailed t o s pend t heir q uota o n d efences. I f a l icence
t o
c renelate
w as
a lways n ecessary u nder t he Empire ,
t hen a ll
c ivil d efences m ust h ave h ad o fficial a pproval . I n t he e arly Empire , d efences may h ave b een a llowed f or r easons o f p restige, b ut t his i s hardly l ikely t o have b een t he c ase i n t he l ater Empire . T he p resence o f l ate d efences i s l ikely t o r epresent t he p urposeful p lacing o f t hem b y t he i mperial g overnment a nd . I n m any c ases t he n eeds o f t he t ownspeople m ay h ave h ad l ittle o r n o r elevance t o t he d ecision t o d efend o r n ot t o d efend a c ertain s ettlement . T his would e xplain why i n B ritain t he p resence o r a bsence o f d efences d oes n ot s eem t o r eflect t he a pparent r elative importance o f t he ' small t owns' c oncerned. T here i s l ittle e vidence t hat a ny o f t hese s ites i n w hat i s g enerally t ermed t he ' civil a reas' o f B ritain have a p urely military f unction . No n ew f orts a re k nown t o h ave b een b uilt i n t he l owland a rea o f B ritain i n t he l ate t hird o r f ourth c entury e xcept f or t hose d irectly a ssociated w ith c oastal d efence . B rough-on-Humber h as b een c laimed b y o ne o f i ts e xcavators a s p rimarily a n aval b ase, t hough i t may a t t he s ame t ime h ave f unctioned a s t he c ivitas c apital o f t he P arisi ( Wacher 1 969; 1 971) . o f t he h istory o f i ts
T his was i nferred f rom t he a pparent s imilarity d efences t o t hose o f m ilitary s ites i n B ritain
r ather t han t o t hose o f c ivil d efences . A lso , n one o f t he b uildings s o f ar f ound within t he d efences i s paralleled within o ther t owns. C ivitas c apitals which a lso f unctioned a s p art o f t he d efences o f a n a rea a re k nown a long t he G allic c oast. s uggests t hat i n t he e arly t hird c entury,
military J ohnson
t he t owns o f C aister-by-
Y armouth , C olchester , L ondon , R ochester , a nd p robably R ichborough a nd L ympne, a cted a s d efences o f what l ater b ecame known a s t he S axon S hore ( Johnson J . 1 980A , I n t he i n
7 6).
l ater R oman p eriod i n t he west a nd t hroughout
t he e ast,
i t
w as
c ommon p ractice t o b illet
t he R oman p eriod
s oldiers
w ithin
t owns .
S ome o f t he l arger u nits i n t he a rmy ( the l egions a nd v exillationes) were s tationed i n c ities, J ones s uggests i n p ermanent b arracks . T he m obile u nits o f t he p alatini a nd c omitatenses were n ormally b illeted i n c ities ( Jones A . 1 973, 6 31). S ome military u nits i n t he Notitia s ections
d ealing with
t he Western Empire a re r ecorded a s b eing b ased
i n t owns, f or e xample O c. XXXVII n umber 1 7 a nd 2 1 ( Seeck 1 876,
2 05).
I n t he B ritish d iocese, t he p resence o f t roops within a c ivil s ettlement i s h inted a t i n t he N otitia o nly i n t he c ase o f B rough-onH umber . S tationed a t D erventio ( probably M alton ) u nder t he c ommand o f t he dux Britanniarum, was t he numerus supervenientium P etuariensium , i n o r b y
p resumably a u nit w hich h ad f or a t ime b een s tationed
P etuaria, t he c ivitas c apital o f t he P arisi ( Oc . c h . X L n o .
3 1). A n umber
o f
t owns
i n B ritain h ave b een t hought
t o h ave b een o ccupied
b y r egular a rmy d etachments i n t he f ourth c entury . T his has b een most o ften c laimed f or C atterick , b ut a lso f or A ldborough, C orbridge a nd Wroxeter . At C atterick, e xcavations i n t he 1 940s a nd 5 0s r evealed t he p resence o f a n e arly f ort w hich h ad b een a bandoned c irca A D 1 20, but a bandonment
was was
r eoccupied i n t he A D 1 60s. I ts f inal d ate o f u nclear, b ut b y t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth
1 49
c enturies
i ts
t hat
walled .
t ime
s ite w as
c lay-and-cobble wide d itch .
o ccupied b y a
T he
d efences
f oundation
c ivil s ettlement
c onsisted
3 .35m wide
o f
which
wall
w as
w hich w as a t
2 .20m
f ronted
t hick
b y
o n
a
a s ingle ,
Although n o r ampart b ank was p rovided, a ll t he a ngles
were r ounded a nd n o p rojecting t owers s eem t o h ave b een p rovided ( cf H ildyard a nd Wade 1 948-51; H ildyard a nd G illam 1 957; Wacher 1 971, 1 70-2) . t he
T here was e vidence o f
f ourth
a rgued o f
c entury,
t hat
t his
t he b uildings
d ated b y
r ebuilding f ound ,
m uch b uilding a ctivity a t s ome t ime i n
t he
e xcavators
p rogramme,
t o
c irca A D
r adically
3 70 .
a ltering
Wacher
t he
n ature
must p oint t o a n e qually r adical c hange i n t he
nature o f t he s ettlement. T here was, i n t he c entral p art o f t he s ettlement, a r eplacement o f ' strip h ouses' with o pen f ronts b y l arger c ourtyarded c omplexes,
o ne a t
l east e ntered t hrough a m onumental g ate .
T he p resence o f s upposed m ilitary e quipment a nd weapons o f l ate d ate p rompted Wacher t o s uggest t hat t he s ettlement r eceived a g arrison , p robably a s part o f t he r eorganisation o f C ount T heodosius, c ivilians
may
d efences.
He
r epresent h ouses
s till
h ave
s uggests
o ccupied t he
p art
l arge
o f
t he
c omplexes
6 .2 i n
h a
t hough
within
i nsula
V II
t he may
t he p rincipia a nd p raetorium, while t he c onverted s trip
m ight
h ave
b een
b arracks
o r
s tore
b uildings .
T he
a bsence
o f
a dded e xternal t owers here d oes n ot imply t hat t he s ite was more a f ort t han a t own ; f ew ( Wacher 1 975B, 5 1) . A t Aldborough,
small
t owns
r eceived
a dded p rojecting
t he r emarkably h igh p roportion o f c oins d ated t o t he
H ouse o f V alentinian when c oinage was g enerally s carce , s uggest t hat a u nit o f t emporarily, t hat
4 04) .
c irca A D
u nit
l ed Wacher
t o
t he f ield a rmy may have b een s tationed here
p ossibly b eing r emoved b y Maximus.
a s imilar
1 975A ,
t owers
H e a lso s uggests
m ay h ave b een s tationed within C atterick
Mann s uggested t hat t he h oard o f
4 8 g old c oins
( Wacher d ated t o
3 87 f rom C orbridge m ay r epresent t he q uinquennial d onative o f
Magnus Maximus . been v ery d onative
I f
t his were t rue,
high-grade
( Gillam
t roops
1 974A ,
i n
6 ) .
C asey n oted t hat
C orbridge
L ittle
t o
t here must h ave
have r eceived s uch a
i s k nown o f
t he
l ater h istory
o f
t he military c ompounds within t he t own, t hough t hey d o s eem t o have c ontinued i n u se i nto t he f ourth c entury. p lumbatae f rom b y Mr .
P .
t he s ite o f
B arker t o i ndicate
t he l ater R oman p eriod .
T he p resence o f hastae
t he b aths b asilica a t Wroxeter was t hought t he p resence
o f
t he
r egular a rmy h ere
i n
W ebster s ees Wroxeter a s t he major s trategic
c entre i n t he n orth-west m idlands which was a ppreciated b y C onstantius C hloru is
a nd
p robably
a lso
b y
C ount
T heodosius .
T his
h e b elieves
i s
c onfirmed b y t he f inding o f s ix martiobarbuli i n t he b asilica . Two o f t he l egions b rought b y C ount T heodosius t o B ritain , t he J ovii a nd H erculi ,
a re e arlier r ecorded a s b eing c alled
martiobarbulus .
" The d iscovery o f s o many o f t hese weapons i n t he Wroxeter b asilica may
i ndicate
q uarters t he
f or
t hat t he
t his
b uilding was
l egionaries
s traw b edding"
a nd
( Webster G .
t hat
1 975B,
r equisitioned b y t he d arts
a rmy
a s
m ay h ave b een l ost
t he
i n
1 06) .
S tevens t hought t hat a ll t he t owns r eceiving a dded e xternal t owers a cted
a s
t here was
a ctual
o r
p otential
o ne p resent
Webster s uggests
t hat
c antonments
( Stevens s ome o f
1 971,
o f
t he
f ield
a rmy
w henever
3 5) .
t he f ortified c ivil
s ites
m ay h ave b een
c onnected with t he h ousing o f o fficials, p olice, t ax c ollectors and
1 50
c ustoms
o fficials,
t he
l atter
p roliferating
i n
t he
e arly
c entury d ue t o t he d ivision o f B ritain i nto f our p rovinces 1 975A ,
5 9) .
O ne would e xpect
i n B ritain were b uilt
t hat
f or u se
s ome
a s
o f
f ourth
( Webster
t he f ortified s ettlements
c ollecting
p oints
o f
t he
a nnona
militaris, a s happened e lsewhere i n t he Empire, y et a t n o s ite have s uitable b arns, t hat
t hese
g ranaries,
o r s tockyards
i nstallations
may have
b een f ound .
i nternal e nemies, bacaudae o r b rigands, ( Rivet 1 975, 1 12; J ohnson J . 1 980A, 1 2). r aiders
t o make n o p rovision f or
R ivet
n eeded p rotection a s
f ood
s uggests
much
f rom
a s f rom barbarian r aiders I t was u sual f or b arbarian
s upplies
d uring
t heir
c ampaign ,
h ence t hey were t otally d ependent o n f ood a cquired b y p lundering .
I f
a ll t he l ivestock a nd g rain c ould be r apidly b rought i nto f ortified t owns
b efore
i t
f ace a f amine, 1 965,
f ell
i nto
t he h ands
o f
r aiders,
b eing f orced t o s urrender
t he
e nemy would s oon
o r withdraw
( Thompson E .
1 41).
Webster
h as
n oted
t hat
i f
t he f ortified s ettlements
a re p lotted o n a
map o f B ritain, t hey a re f ound t o l ie a long t hree major R oman r oads. T he in
p lacing many
o f
a s tring
provinces
T hroughout
t he
o f
o f
d efended s ites
t he
p rincipate
Empire
t he
i n
Empire's
a long t he
m ost
r uns
f rom K öln t hrough T ongres
small f ortlets o n t his r oad were t hought before t he i nvasions o f AD 2 75-6; h owever,
i s
s een
period.
r oads
h ad b een
1 88).
One s uch l ate
t o B avai .
S ome o f
t o have b een f irst
t he
b uilt
t hey were r ebuilt a fter t his a nd
r emained i n u se t hroughout t he f ourth N ow,
r outes Roman
i mportant
s upervised b y b eneficiarii ( Petrikovits 1 971, f ortified r oad
m ajor
l ater
c entury
( SchOnberger
1 969,
1 79) .
e xcavation i s b eginning t o s how t hat v arious s ites a long
t his r oad were o ccupied a t d ifferent t imes i n t he t hird and f ourth c enturies - t here , a s e lsewhere,
a pparent s imilarity o f s hape d oes n ot
prove t hat t he s ites were held c ontemporaneouoly ( Johnson J . 9 1).
a nd v illages s hould b e s he
1 980A,
I n t he a rea o f t he Treveri, Wightman n otes t hat f orts, i n t he
t hought
s uggests,
o f
l ater Empire a s
l inks
i ndicates
a re
o ften
i n a s ingle
t hat
s ome
t owns
i ndistinguishable
c hain .
a ccount
a nd
V ariation i n s ize, was
t aken
o f
l ocal
r equirements which may have d epended p artly o n t he availability o f f inance ; l ocal
r eponsibility
c ommunities.
f or
materials
a nd
T he employment
s hortage o f r esouces a s much a s haste i nteresting t o n ote t hat ' castra%
a s
l abour
may
h ave
f allen
o n
r e-used m aterials s uggests
( Wightman 1 971, 4 78).
I t
i s
i n Gaul small walled t owns were known a s
t hey p robably were
I n a p aper d elivered t o
o f
i n B ritain
( Johnson
J .
1 975,
7 9).
t he S eventh C ongress o f R oman F rontier S tudies
i n 1 967 , Webster d rew a ttention t o a s eries o f f ortified p osts a long t he W atling S treet b etween C aves I nn a nd Wroxeter . F ive s ites were s o
d escribed
Mancetter
( figs.
( Pennocrucium ) may
h ave
1 1,
1 2
( Manduesedum), a nd R ed H ill
b een
f ortified
a nd
o r
Webster
r efurbished n ow
c onnects
a t
b y
t hem
H e
C ount t hat
i n t he l ate with
C aves
( Letocetum),
( Uxacona) .
A rchaeological e vidence s uggests built
1 3)
Wall
I nn
s uggested
Theodosius
t he
e arly
t hat
Bridge
t hese
( Webster
t he d efences o f
t hird o r
( Tripontium),
S tretton G .
s ites 1 971).
t hese s ites were
f ourth
r eorganisation
o f
c enturies. B ritain
b y
C onstantius C hlorus . " Control d iocese
o f i nto
t his
important
two p arts,
r oute would h ave e ffectively d ivided t he
t hus
e nabling
his
f orces
t o
s eal
o ff
t he
r aiding parties t o t he s outh west o f t he l ine and p revent t hem f rom m oving b ack t o t he n orth" ( Webster G . 1 975B, 4 6) .
1 51
T here i s
n o e vidence f or t he p resence o f
t he B ritish P rovinces T he f ive
f ortified p osts n oted b y W ebster a long t he Watling S treet a re
a ll b asically smaller
r aiders f rom t he n orth w ithin
i n t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c enturies.
t han
r ectangular , t he o thers,
between 2 and 3 h a
t hough
t he p ost
a t
R ed H ill
e nclosing o nly 0 .32 h a .
i s
c onsiderbly
T he o ther p osts a re
( the a ctual s ize o f C aves I nn i s n ot known d ue t o
d estruction b y g ravel working o f
much o f t he s ite).
A s tone wall
with a c ontemporary r ampart b ank h as b een f ound a t Wall a nd Mancetter a t f oundation l evel a bout has yet been f ound, J oseph t race
1 956) . o f
within
A t
which
t ravellers
o nly
o ne
n o r ampart
t renched
d itch h as b een n oted .
with
t hese
d efences
h as
a nd
s ettlers
c ould
s eek
s helter
o n
b een
t he
( St.
L ittle f ound
b een s uggested t hat t hey a cted a s r efuges
d anger ( Gould 1 964). military u nits 1 975A, 6 5).
I nn ,
c ontemporary
i t h as
S tretton B ridge ,
At
t he t riple d itches have b een
C aves
o ccupation
t hem a nd
2 .72m wide .
b ut
i nto
o nset
o f
T hey may have p rovided s trongholds f or small
o n t he
m ove
Whatever t he p urpose o f
o r b een p ermanent p olice p osts
t hese d efended p osts,
n ot a ppear t o h ave b een d esigned
f or
( Webster G .
which b y t heir n ature d o
t emporary u se ,
t heir
d efences
d o
n ot s eem t o h ave r emained i n c ommission l ong . A t C aves I nn , a t l east o ne l ength o f t he d itch was f illed i n v ery c arefully - p ottery a t a ll l evels
o f
t he f ill d ated t o t he e arly f ourth c entury.
c ontinued
o n
t he
s ite
( Cameron a nd L ucas
1 971-3) .
O ccupation
A c oin h oard f rom
t he u pper d itch f ill a t R ed H ill i ndicated a t erminal d ate o f c irca A D 3 50 f or
t he
d itch's
f rom
t he
f ill o f
with
i ndustrial
u se
t he
( Browne
o uter
waste
( Thomas
N owhere
e lse
i n B ritain i s
p osts;
a long
° the,- r oads
a re o ften o f much o f C aves I nn, ha),
1 974) .
d itch a t N .
t here a s imilar s eries t here
l arger s ize .
a re
f ortified
A long
o f
small,
s ettlements,
f ortified b ut
t hese
Thorpe
R ochester,
and
O n t he F osse Way t here i s a
i ncluding C hesterton, H igh C ross,
Brough.
D orchester
J ohnson
( Oxon),
a re a lso o f t he s ame s tyle ( Johnson J . were f ortified a t t he s ame t ime .
1 976B).
t o b e a m arked l ack o f b uildings; m asonry
with
i nside t he n orth g ate ( Wacher 1 964). e xamined i n t he c entre o f d itches,
t he s ite ,
o ccasional
a nd
t hat
Mildenhall
N ot a ll t hese s ites
Within t he d efences a t m any o f t hem
t here s eems
c ontemporary
s uggests
A lchester
b uilding
g ullies,
c ame
t here a re t hree f ortified s ites - a t Whilton L odge ( 5
Bridgeford,
o f
d ate
l evelled o ff
t he Watling S treet t o t he s outh
T owcester a nd S toney S tratford.
L ittlechester ,
t erminal
1 964) .
s eries between D orn a nd L incoln, East
A s imilar
Mancetter which was
t he
a t T horpe a s ubstantial
s tone
wall
t he main f eatures
p ost-holes
was
f ound
j ust
A t Whilton L odge, i n t he 4 60 0 ' a nd
a g reat
f ound were p its, n umber
o f
s take-
h oles . Mortar f loors a nd f oundation t renches o f a t l east t wo t imber buildings s urvived i n o ne a rea, b ut n o e vidence was f ound f or s tone s tructures
( Taylor
1 972).
D uring t he f ourth c entury, m any t owns h ad t heir s tone d efences b rought i nto l ine with t hose o n t he C ontinent a nd t he S axon S hore f orts b y t he a ddition o f e xternal t owers, t hough i t i s n oteworthy t hat n one o f t he f orts i n t he n orth o f B ritain, Wales o r even t he f orts a t B rancaster and Reculver o n t he S axon S hore was a t t he s ame t ime p rovided with e xternal t owers . t he smaller t owns
N ot a ll t owns were g iven e xternal t owers - m any o f t hat h ad b een walled i n s tone were n ot s o p rovided ,
n or were t he c ivitas A t
c apitals o f
s ome small t owns,
S ilchester a nd E xeter
( Bidwell
1 980) .
t he i nner d itches were f illed i n a s t hough t o
1 52
a llow t he a ddition o f t owers, b ut t hese d o n ot s eem t o h ave b een c onstructed . A t L incoln t he e arly s econd-century walls which were o nly
a bout
1 .22m t hick were
t hickened i n t he
l ate t hird o r f ourth
c enturies. A t G loucester t he walls were r ebuilt i n many p laces 4m wide i n t he f ourth c entury ( pers. c omm . Mr . M . J ones). T he a ddition o f e xternal t owers t o t own d efences h as i n t he p ast b een t hought o f a s t he r esult o f a n i mperial d irective a nd a ssociated w ith t he p resence o f C ount T heodosius i n B ritain o r t he v isit o f C onstans t o t he d iocese i n A D 3 42-3 . A s with t he b uilding o f s tone d efences, t he t owers m ay h ave b een a dded o ver a p eriod o f t ime . O n t he e vidence f rom B ritain, p layed a n i mportant p art
c an o ne maintain t hat c ivil d efences
i n t he
m ilitary
d efence o f
t he
d iocese?
would b e i nclined t o d oubt t his. T he e vidence f or t he p ossible p resence o f t roops w ithin t owns w ill b e d ealt w ith i n t he n ext c hapter a nd i t will s uffice t o n ote here t hat t here i s n o c lear i ndication t hat t he t owns o f B ritain were n ormally g arrisoned b y t he a rmy . T hey were n ot, a nd d id n ot p erform t he f unction o f f orts. F ortified t owns would h ave b een u seful t o t he g overnment, m ainly t o p rotect t he c omplicated a dministrative m achinery h oused w ithin t hem a nd n ecessary f or t he e xploitation o f t he p rovincials. T he p rotection o f a nnona militaris would have b een o f p aramount importance t o
t he t he
g overnment a nd would have b een g reatly f acilitated b y t he n umerous d efended t owns i n t he d iocese . T he t owns will h ave a cted a s u nassailable s trongholds i n t he e vent o f a n e nemy i ncursion t hrough t he f rontier d efences .
T hey w ould n o d oubt i n t hat s ituation b e u sed
b y t he a rmy , b ut i n B ritain a t l east t hey were p robably n ot d esigned p rimarily f or m ilitary u se . I t was n ecessary t o d efend t owns a nd t he p eople o f t he r ural a reas a round t hem, i f o nly t o p reserve t he l ogistic b ase e xistence.
o n
which
t he
a rmy
o f
o ccupation
d epended
f or
i ts
A major c hange t ook p lace i n f rontier d efence i n t he t hird c entury when t he o ld r igid f rontiers o f t he p rincipate b ecame u ntenable a nd i t c ould n o l onger b e g uaranteed t hat t he b arbarians would b e h eld o n t he l imites which i n m any c ases c onsisted o f o nly a s ingle l ine o f f orts . B y t he f ourth c entury, d efence was b eing p rovided i n d epth . T he e arly imperial s ystem o f d efence c alled f or t he R oman a rmy t o a dvance a nd d efeat t he i nvading b arbarians o n b arbarian s oil . I n t he f ourth c entury t he R oman a rmy i ncreasingly had t o d efeat t he b arbarians o n R oman s oil. H ence, f rontier p rovinces b ecame t he f ighting g round . T his c hange i n s trategical t hinking i s c learly s een i n n orthern B ritain where t he ' offensive d efence' o f t he s econd, t hird a nd e arly f ourth c enturies ( as i ndicated b y t he p resence o f o utposts n orth o f t he Wall) was r eplaced i n t he l ater f ourth c entury with t he a bandonment o f t he o utpost f orts b y a p urely d efensive s trategy . T he p osition o f H adrian 's W all c hanged f rom b eing i n e ffect t he l ast l ine o f d efence t o t he f irst . T he n orthern f rontier , h owever , was s till a ble t o r emain a p reclusive f rontier, a t l east i n t he f ace o f l and a ttacks. I n t he h interland o f
t he W all i n t he f ourth c entury,
t here was l ittle
c hange i n t he p attern o f military o ccupation . O n t he C ontinent, a long t he r iver f rontiers o f t he R hine a nd D anube , t he g arrison t roops h ad b een s pread i n a t hin l ine . W hen t he d efensive n eeds r equired a d efence i n d epth, n ew military i nstallations had t o b e b uilt i n t he h interland .
I n
n orthern B ritain ,
1 53
t he
l and
f rontier
was
v ery
s hort,
yet
t he g arrison was
t roops small
a long
t he
f orts
o ver
T his n etwork o f i n d epth, b ut e nvisaged. " They
were
l arge .
a ctual t he
w hole
f orts when
s imply
I t was n ot p ossible t o p lace a ll t he
f rontier
l ine
a nd
s o
t hey
were
d ispersed
r egion f rom t he Wall s outh
c ontrolling t he r egion i t was c onstructed,
s tationed a t
s ites
i n
t o D erbyshire .
was i n e ffect a d efence t his f unction was n ot
which would a llow t hem e asy
a ccess t hrough t he f rontier i f n ecessary" ( Mann 1 979B, 1 80 ) .
a nd when h ostile
Mann b elieves
i n t he e astern h interland o f t he Wall
( for which await
a n
t hat
we h ave
i nvasion
t he n ew u nits e vidence b y
a ny
i n
t he
h ostile
N otitia)
f orce .
were
T heir
a ction
n ot
made
p laced
d eployment
t his
t here a long
t o t he
main r oads t o t he f rontier s uggested t o h im t hat t hey were t o move r apidly
t hrough
t he
f rontier
i n
t he e vent
o f
a ttack.
T his c ould
possibly have b een d one while t he a rea t o t he north o f t he Wall was u nder
s urveillance,
b ut
with t he a bandonment o f
t he o utposts i t w ould
s eem unlikely t hat a dequate knowledge o f a n impending a ttack would have b een available t o t he Romans which would have a llowed t hem t o a dvance north o f t he Wall b efore i t was d elivered. 1 80s,
I n t he e arly AD
when p robably f our o utposts were h eld b eyond t he Wall a long D ere
S treet,
a n
i nvasion
s eems
t o
have
p enetrated
a s
f ar
s outh
a s
C orbridge. L uttwak
r easonably
s uggests
t hat
t he
main a im
o f
c ommand was t o maintain a p reclusive f rontier .
t he
R oman
m ilitary
O n t he C ontinent t his
proved impossible i n t he t hird c entury, h ence t he d evelopment o f a d efence s igns
i n
o f
d epth .
Whenever
e nduring s uccess,
t he
s trategy
o f
d efence
i n
d epth
s howed
i t was p romptly a bandoned i n f avour o f
p reclusive s ecurity ( Luttwak 1 976,
1 32).
I n B ritain,
t he n orthern
f rontier was n ever penetrated d eeply - t he two i nvasions f or which t here a s
i s
a ny
e vidence
C orbridge
( dated
a re a rchaeologically a ttested t o c irca AD
1 05 and
1 80).
o nly a s
f ar s outh
T here was h ence n o
r eason t o p rovide a d efence i n d epth i n n orthern B ritain . J ones, h owever, d rawing h is i nspiration f rom L uttwak, s uggests d efence i n d epth i n n orthern B ritain with C atterick a s o f
t he s trategic n erve c entre
t he n orthern c ommand a nd a s a n e ssential c omponent
d efended i n d epth ( Jones G . 1 978; 1 979, What
o f
t he
e vidence f or a d efence
t he d iocese?
o f
t he f rontier
6 7).
i n d epth o n t he o ther f rontiers
o f
T he S axon S hore a nd t he s outh west were particularly
o pen t o a ttack - i n n either a rea were t here a ny f orts by t he e arly t hird c entury. r eliance
On t he e ast and s outh c oasts,
o n f ortified
t owns
t he R ichborough f ortlet,
a nd
t he
f orts
a fter t he s uggested
a t B rancaster,
a n e xtensive s ystem o f
f orts
R eculver a nd
was
b uilt
l ater
i n t he c entury . T hese p rotected t he main r iver e stauries a nd p orts, b ut i n t hemselves were much t oo f ew t o p rovide a dequate p rotection f or t he
l ong a nd v ulnerable c oastline .
t he S axon S hore d efences a nd
n orth Kent
c oasts
a re
l argely
i llusory
s ince
were p rotected b y marshes,
L ympne and P evensey c onsisting o f p opulated Weald ( Copley 1 958 , 1 44) . a p reclusive f rontier,
C opely s uggested t hat t he g aps much t he
i n
t he E ssex
g ap b etween
t he s eaward e nd o f t he t hinlyW as t his l imes t o b e d efended a s
o r t o b e d efended i n d epth a s was
Romans o n many o ther f rontiers?
o f
f orced o n t he
T o h ave d efeated t he s ea r aiders
b efore t hey were a ble t o l and would h ave
r equired
a n e fficient
s ystem
o f p atrolling s uch a s would have b een d ifficult t o a chieve with t he
1 54
v essels
available
however,
t o
implied
T hese v essels
t he
R omans.
S ome
r eference
i n
t ype
o f
V egetius
a t
u sed
i n
f ourth-century
D erventio
i n
t he
B ritain .
N otitia,
s tationed a t B rough-on-Humber,
b ut
p atrolling
( IV
- g iven t he t echnical n ame s uperventus
s couting v essels s tationed
t he
b y
3 7)
i s,
t o pictae.
( surprise) - were
T he
S upervenientes
p robably
o riginally
may have b een c onnected with t hese
s couting v essels which i n B ritain were p ainted blue t o a void t heir b eing s potted . T he c rews a lso wore c amouflaged c lothing . H assall s uggests
t hat
d own
t o
t he
mid-fourth
c entury
t here may have b een
f leets based i n t he Humber, Tees a nd Tyne ( Hagsall c lassis
Anderetianorum,
p resumably b een b ased I f
Johnson's
s tationed
e arlier
s trategical
a t
a t
P aris
( p . 17 , .
P evensey
f ramework
f or
i n
1 976, t he
c h .
X LII
t he u se o f
1 12).
T he
Notitia, n o .
had
2 3) .
t he S axon S hore
d efences i s c orrect, t hen a t l east i n t he C hannel r aiders were t o b e i ntercepted
a t
s ea,
t hough
even
i n
t he
S traits
o f
Dover,
bad
v isability would r ender t he s ystem a ll b ut u seless ( Johnson J . 1 976A , 1 26-7). I f r aiders were t o b e i ntercepted when t hey had made a l andfall, c avalry would b e most e ffective a gainst t hem a s mobility would
c ertainly b e n eeded .
within m any
o f
N otitia were
t he
T he e vidence f or
S axon S hore
g arrisoned b y
f orts
i s
c avalry.
t he p resence
s lim - o nly
I f t here was
t wo
o f
c avalry
f orts
i n
t he
m uch l ikelihood o f
r aiders a ctually p enetrating t he S axon S hore d efences, t hen a s ystem o f d efence i n d epth would b e n ecessary and t he p resence o f a mobile r eserve i n t he h interland would h ave b een o f
g reat v alue .
B ehind t he
l itus S axonicum t here i s n o evidence o f any s uch mobile f orce. f orts
o f
l ate R oman d ate have b een f ound
l itus.
I t
r etained
i s
i ts
c ity
d efences
Many
o f
t he
were
e ast
i nland
c lear
b ut
i t h as
f rom
whether
f unction a t
f illed
f ortified
a mobile f orce , n orth
n ot
m ilitary
i n
t owns
i t
b y
i n
t he
t his t he
C ripplegate
d ate
t hird
- i ts c entury
t he h interland
f ort
d itches
b een
s uggested
t hat
Malton
( Merrifield
t he
1 966 ) .
c ould h ave h oused a nd
t he
i n L ondon within
i s d ifficult t o s how a rchaeologically .
t he s ignal
N o
i n t he hinterland o f
s uch
I n t he
P iercebridge ,
l ying
s tations o n t he Yorkshire a nd p ossibly t he
C ounty Durham c oasts, may have p rovided t roops t o i ntercept t he r aiders o nce t heir p resence had b een n oted b y t he s ignal s tations ( Hassall
1 976,
1 12).
I n t he s outh west t here i s l ittle evidence f or t he p rovision o f n ew d efences. s uggested C armarthen
I n S outh Wales a f ort was p laced a t C ardiff. t hat t o
a s ystem o f t he s ea
a nd
a t P embroke where c oins
watch-towers t hat
o f
t hat
t here
c onnected
J ones has
t he walled
t own o f
m ay h ave b een a l ate R oman p ost
d ate h ave b een f ound .
T o t he s outh e ast o f t he B ristol C hannel a nd i n D evon a nd C ornwall, n o s uch d efences a re k nown . There i s v irtually n o e vidence f or a military p resence i n t hat a rea l ater i n d ate t han t he f irst c entury, t hough t he wall a nd t owers s urviving a t O ldaport b y t he m outh o f t he River E rme n ear Modbury may b e o f Roman d ate a nd c ould belong t o a l ater R oman f ort .
R oman c oarse p ottery a nd s amian h ave b een f ound o n
t he site ( pers. c omm . Mr. P . B idwell). P R R EL o n a m osaic d ated
t o
A t L ydney a man d escribed a s
t he f ourth c entury
( but n ot n ecessarily a s
l ate a s Wheeler's e xcavations would s uggest) has b een t hought t o be p ossibly a praefectus r eliquationis c lassis.
I f s o, t his may mean
t hat t here was a n aval f lotilla i n t he B ristol C hannel. S ea Mills h as o n o ccasion b een s uggested a s a n aval b ase . T he s uggestion t hat t he R omano-Celtic t emple a t
B rean D own p erhaps
1 55
f unctioned a s
a watch
t ower a s w ell a s a t emple s eems u nlikely ( Livens 1 974 , 3 35) . I n t his a rea t here a re f ew walled t owns t hat c ould h ave o ffered b ases f or a rmy u nits . T he s outh-west i s t he m ain a rea w here t races o f d estruction i n A D 3 67 h ave b een c laimed i n r ecent y ears .
1 56
C HAPTER 1 1
THE E VIDENCE F OR T HE P RESENCE O F LAETI A ND F OEDERATI I N L ATER R OMAN B RITAIN
I n t he e arly R oman p eriod t here was a n umber o f G erman a uxiliary u nits s tationed i n B ritain whose p resence i n many c ases i s a ttested well i nto
t he t hird c entury ,
m ade
t he m embers o f
t aste i f n ot
i n r acial o rigin .
barbarian g roups B ritain . d ispatched
t hough b y
r ecorded
P ossibly t o
t hat
d ate
l ocal
t hese u nits m ore B ritish ,
t he
i n
a t
r ecruiting
D uring t he R oman p eriod , t he
l argest
m ay h ave
l east i n o utlook a nd a n umber o f
l iterary s ources were b rought i nto g roup
was
t he
t he p rovince b y Marcus A urelius i n A D
5 ,500
S armatians
1 75 .
I n B ritain ,
t he presence o f o nly a small p roportion o f t hese men i s a ttested a t Ribchester.
I n
t he
e arly
t hird
c entury
two
u nits,
p robably
r ecruited i n ' free' Germany, a re a ttested a t Housesteads a s well a s t he
c ohors
I T ungrorum .
T hese u nits
- t he n umerus H naudifridi a nd a
c uneus F risiorum ( possibly t wo n ames f or t he s ame u nit) - r etained t he worship o f t heir n ative G ermanic g ods a nd a ppear t o h ave c ontinued t o u se p ottery made i n t heir o wn n ative t radition I n
c irca A D
2 77,
Z osimus
r ecords
t hat
( Jobey
I ,
1 979) .
t he emperor P robus
l arge n umber o f V andals a nd B urgundians whom h e h ad
s ent
c aptured
o ver a
t o s erv-
a s s oldiers. T here i s n o i ndication a s t o where t hese men were based. A t t hat t ime t he a rchaeological evidence would s uggest a l arge r eduction i n f ort g arrisons i n t he n orth a nd west o f B ritain . T he p resence o f a n A lamannic c hief, imply
C rocus,
a t Y ork i n A D 3 06 n eed n ot
t hat A lamanni h ad b een s ettled i n t he a rea
( cf .
Myres
1 969 ,
6 6) .
H e a nd h is men were n o d oubt p art o f t he f orce C onstantius C hlorus h ad b rought with him t o B ritain i n AD 3 05 f or his P ictish War a nd would h ave a ccompanied C onstantine t o t he C ontinent i n t he f ollowing y ear ( Aurelius V ictor d e C aesoribus X XXIX , 4 1) . I n A D 3 72, V alentinian i s r ecorded a s s ending F raomarius, k ing o f t he B ucinobantes ( a t ribe o f t he Alamanni) t o B ritain with t he r ank o f t ribune a nd g iving him c ommand o f a numerus o f t he Alamanni ( AM. XXIX, 4 , 7 ). P resumably t hese
t roops
1 977,
1 5,
f n .
a lready
f ormed p art
o f
t he r egular a rmy i n B ritain
( Mann
1 7).
There i s n o i ndication i n t he l iterary s ources f or t he p resence o f f ree G ermans with a s tatus d istinct f rom t hat d iocese o f Britain . b een t hought
I n t he Notitia
t o b reak o ff
b efore a ny
o f r egular t roops
i n t he
X LII) t he l ist o f l aeti has m ention o f
s uch u nits
i n B ritain
i s made. Mann has s uggested, h owever, t hat t he s upposed l acuna i n t his c hapter m ay b e n o m ore t han a n u nnecessary i nvention o f S eeck's ( Mann 1 974, 1 4). T he t erm l itus S axonicum u sed i n t he Notitia t o d escribe t he s outh a nd e ast c oasts o f B ritain a nd t he c oast o f G allia B elgica , h as s uggested t o s ome s cholars t hat t his i s e vidence f or t he c oast h aving b een s ettled b y S axons d uring t he R oman p eriod , e ither a s
1 57
l aeti
o r
f oederati.
b arbarians
i n a reas
I t
t hat
was
n ormal
f rontier
p olicy
were u nder b arbarian a ttack ,
e ven
t o
s ettle
b y
men
o f
t he s ame t ribe a s t hose being c harged with t he d efence o f t hat area ( Johnson
J .
1 977,
6 3) .
T he
a rchaeological
e vidence
f or
t he p resence
o f
S axons b efore t he f ifth c entury will b e d ealt with b elow;
n o
means p roven t hat
a p art
S axons were s ettled i n B ritain while
o f
t he
R oman
b arbarians
p ar
e xcellence
have
d ared
Only
o ne
s ettle
unit
o f
Empire.
t hem
a nd
T he
within
S axons
S axons
J ohnson
i s
t he
were
s uggests Empire
r ecorded
i n
s tationed i n S yria ( Or. XXXII, n . 3 7).
l ooked u pon a s
t hat
n o
emperor
( Johnson t he
i t i s b y
i t r emained
J .
t he
would
1 976C,
8 2).
t his
was
N otitia;
T he f ear t hat S axons s truck
i n R oman h earts i s i llustrated b y a l etter f rom S idonius A pollinaris t o a f riend i n G aul who was o n s ervice a gainst S axon m arauders: " Please d o b e very c areful - t here's n o t ime l ike t he p resent f or a warning . i f
S axons
a re
t he
m ost b rutal o f
e nemies:
t hey'll o nly a ttack
t hey h ave t he a dvantage o f s urprise - i f y ou s ee t hem
s link
away.
T hey
unprepared . I f t hey'll e scape" . A lthough
i t
was
was
p laced
written
i n
d efended
s ites,
b ut
t hey hunt, t hey'll c atch, ( Letters, V III, 6 ,14).
n ot
i s n ot u nique.
avoid
c ommon
h it
f irst
hardest
but i f y ou p ursue
t o n ame a f rontier
a fter
i ts
c ommand
c irca
t hat
D anube
AD
o f
3 90,
t he t he
a ttacker,
B alkans . c ommand
I n i s
t he
A nonymous
c alled
R ipa
t hree
R ome,
i t
V alesianus,
Gothica .
T he
was k illed .
t ime t here was n o G othic p resence o n t he r ight b ank o f ( Hind
1 980 ,
t he
3 20-1) .
L arge b arbarian g roups o f
t he
t hem,
I n AD 3 36, Delmatius C aesar, C onstantine's n ephew,
c ommand c ould o nly h ave l asted t ill A D 3 37 when D elmatius At
t hey'll a t
d ifferent
c ould h ave
ways .
I f
t hey would h ave h eld
n o l egal r ights e xcept
e ntered t he Empire p eaceabl7 i n o ne
t hey h ad u nconditionally
t he s tatus o f d editicii .
t hose
g iven t o
t hem b y
s urrendered
t he R omans .
F oederati
were t ribes o r g roups who h ad e ntered i nto a t reaty with R ome . f oederati n ormally
l ay b eyond t he
f rontiers
o f
t o
S uch p eople h ad
t he Empire
a nd
T hese i t
was
only i n t he l ate f ourth a nd f ifth c enturies t hat s uch i ndependent g roups l iving under t heir own l aws were a llowed within t he Empire. The
f irst
f oederati
o f
t his
s ort
r ecognised a s s uch b y T heodosius a ccept t roops
were
t he
i n A D 3 82 .
V isigoths
who
were
T heodosius was f orced t o
t he V isigothic p resence within t he Empire a s he had t oo f ew t o e xpel t hem .
I n t he west,
t he f irst f oederati s et u p within
t he Empire were t he V isigoths who were g iven l and i n Gaul i n A D 4 18. T he f oederate k ingdom i n n orth Wales o f p robably Laeti
t he V otadini u nder C unnedda i s
mythical.
c ould
b e
p eople
f rom
within
o r
f rom
o utside
t he
Empire
-
g entiles were e xclusively r ecruited f rom b eyond t he I mperial f rontiers ( Mann 1 977 , 1 5 , a s f oreigners; a nd t o
t hey l aeti
s ame
f n .17) . t hey h ad
c ould n ot
A ccording t o S impson , g entiles were t reated v ery l ittle c ontact with R oman p rovincials
m arry a p rovincial .
( Simpson C .
1 97 0.
f unction a nd have h eld
N otitia s tationed
( Oc. i n
X LII) t he
1 2
G allic
H owever,
N o s uch
r estrictions a pplied
t hey may have performed
t he s ame s tatus
i n t he army.
praefecti
l aetorum
a re
p rovinces
- a n umber
o f
r ecorded
t he
I n t he a s
being
p raefecti A entilium
were s tationed i n I talia a nd G aul . T hese l aeti a re l isted a s r egular s oldiers; t heir s ons l ike t hose o f o ther s tate employees w ere b ound t o s erve i n t he a rmy i f f it.
T hat t hey were i rregular s oldiers i s
1 58
o pen t o d oubt - l aeti s erved i n t he c rack palatine r egiments o f t he S cutori a nd G entiles . O ther l aeti s eem t o h ave b een m erely c olonists u nder a rms. L aeti h ad a higher s tatus i n R oman l aw t han o ther b arbarian g roups, b ut u nlike f oederati t hey were s ubject a uthority o f t he R oman g overnment ( Simpson C . 1 971) .
t o t he f inal
T he p resence o f l aeti i n B ritain h as b een i nferred f rom t he e vidence o f p ottery a nd m etalwork . T he s oldiers o f G ermanic o rigin m entioned i n t he l iterary s ources c ould h ave b een a nd p robably were m embers o f t he a uxilia . T here a re t wo t ypes o f p ottery - which h ave b een u sed t o i ndicate t he p resence o f S axons: A nglo-Saxon p ottery i tself which i s d ifficult t o d ate c losely, a nd R oman p ottery, s upposedly d ecorated i n G ermanic s tyle a nd p roduced f or u se b y G ermans, s o-called ' RomanoS axon' ware . M yres, o n t he e vidence o f A nglo-Saxon p ottery i n t his c ountry , h as a rgued t hat s ettlement b y t hese p eoples must h ave b egun a t l east b y t he l ate t hird o r e arly f ourth c enturies a nd was well e stablished b y t he e nd o f t he R oman p eriod . I n t he r eport o n t he c emetery a t C aistor-by-Norwich , t he e xcavators b elieved t hat t he s ite o f t he c emetery may h ave been c leared f or u se b y t he barbarians a s e arly a s t he l ater p art o f t he t hird c entury a nd t hat t he c emetery was u sed o n a n i ncreasing s cale f rom a t l east t he mid-fourth c entury ( Myres and G reen 1 973). T he d ating o f t he Anglo-Saxon p ottery c oncerned i s o f c rucial importance t o t he p roblem . Many h ave d oubted t hat t he S axons c ould have g ot s uch a s trong f oothold i n t he i sland while i t was s till u nder R oman c ontrol . Morris, i n a r eview a rticle o n t he a bove w ork , a ttacks t he d ating o f t he u rns a t C aistor t o b efore c irca A D 4 20 . H e maintains t hat t he C ontinental p arallels a re e ither n ot
c losely
d ated
o r
n ot
p articularly
s imilar
t o
t he
p ieces
i n
q uestion: " Myres' d iscussion d oes n ot s upport t he v iew t hat b urials b egan a t C aistor b efore t he 4 20s"
( Morris J .
1 974,
2 30-1).
" The l ack o f R omano-British o bjects, t he p ersistence o f c remation a nd t he a bsence o f b elt f ittings, makes i t d ifficult t o a gree with h im. ( Myres) . F urthermore , t he a pparent l ack o f f ourth-century A nglo-Saxon b rooches i s h ardly c onsistent with A nglo-Saxons b eing h ere , c remating t heir d ead a nd u sing t heir i ndigenous h and-made p ottery" 1 979, 4 03). A t Mucking,
( Clarke
S axon o ccupation i n t he R oman p eriod has b een c laimed .
H ere t here i s e vidence f or a n e xtensive e arly s ettlement d ated b y t he A nglo-Saxon p ottery f rom t he s ite ( Jones M .U . 1 968) . A s a t C aistorb y-Norwich , t his h as p erhaps b een d ated t oo e arly . T he p resence o f R oman ' military' belt e quipment i n two o f t he S axon Arubenhäus d oes n ot p rove t hat t hese p eople were employed a s mercenaries b y t he R omans. The presence o f t his e quip ment need have no more s ignificance t han t he p resence o f R oman c oins i n S axon g raves .
A s a t
C aistor-by-Norwich , t here i s l ittle a pparent o verlap b etween t he R oman a nd S axon s ettlement ( Johnson J . 1 980A, 1 25). O nly t hree s herds o f R omano-Saxon p ottery w ere f ound i n a p resumed A nglo-Saxon c ontext . R ecently , w are
d oubts h ave b een
p ertaining
t o
t he
c ast
o n
q uestion o f
1 979B).
t he
r elevance
o f
S axon p resence
t he R omano-Saxon
i n B ritain
( Gillam
V ery f ew S axon p ots s how any R oman i nfluence ( Myres 1 969, T he m ain c lass o f R omano-Saxon p ottery i s m ade u p o f p ots i n n ormal R oman f abric a nd t echnique d ecorated with d imples, h ollow
1 59
b osses,
s tamps,
c hevrons,
g roups o f
p ointed o ut t hat a lthough m uch o f which
i s
f ourth
t hree d epressions,
a n umber
o f
G illam
t he s tratified R omano-Saxon p ottery,
o nly a small p roportion
c entury,
e tc.
o f
t he t otal f ound,
pieces
d ate
d ates
s ignificantly
t o t he
e arlier .
Again, while most o f i t has b een f ound i n t he e ast o f Britain o n t he S axon S hore,
i t has a lso been
C umbria a nd a t
Wroxeter .
f ound
i n Y orkshire,
H e s uggested
t hat
t he
Northumberland,
a pparent
c orrelation
between t he a reas where t he bulk o f R omano-Saxon pottery has b een f ound a nd
t he a reas
m ost
l ikely
t o h ave b een t he f irst
S axons need n ot b e s ignificant. which
i s known
t o have b een
' normal' R oman p roducts a n ormal p attern l oss o f S cotland . S hore
may
o f
i n
and
a s
made
i n t he s ame k ilns
t he E ssex
s imply b e t he r esult o f
p ottery l ate
f rom
f ifth
c haracteristics
a nd
a s
H ertfordshire
o ther
a rea ,
l arge n umbers o f
' free' G ermany
and
p resent
r egular t roops
I f Romano-Saxon ware was s ixth
( as
Myres
c entury
i nfluenced b y
would have u s
Anglo-Saxon
o n R omano-Saxon ware ,
I t
i s
c hronologically
m ore
a cceptable
b elieve)
pottery
s hows
o ne would e xpect
t o s ee
s imilar i nfluences a t work o n l ater ' free' G ermanic p ottery , n ot .
m ore
e xhibits
d istribution f or p roducts o f t hat a rea a fter t he T he p resence o f m uch o f t his material o n t he S axon
being i n g arrison t here. G ermanic
s ettled b y t he
H e a rgued t hat R omano-Saxon ware,
t o
s uggest
b ut w e d o
t hat
R omano-
S axon ware i s a p articular d evelopment o f R omano-British p ottery with which i t p otters .
had much i n c ommon, which l ater i nfluenced Anglo-Saxon A ll t he m otifs s een o n p ots which a re a ccepted a s R omano-
S axon a re
s een o n
o ther R omano-British p roducts .
s tamps a nd c hevrons a re p art o f B ritish p otters.
B osses,
d imples,
t he o rdinary s tock i n t rade o f R omano-
Two p ots o f Romano-Saxon t ype have b een f ound i n
t he north s ecurely s tratified and d ated b efore t he f ourth c entury o ne f rom Bewcastle a ssociated with c oins o f t he T etrici a nd o ne a t T urret 3 3b whi,h went o ut o f u se i n t he s econd c entury. s ums u p h is a rgument t hus:
Mr. Gillaw
" Romano-Saxon wares were made i n t his c ountry a t s everal d ifferent c entres, t hough i n a l imited r egion .
T hey were R oman i n t echnique
and were n ot necessarily i nfluenced b y f ree G ermanic vessels o f t he R oman p eriod . where s ome a re
f ound
T hey b elong l argely t o t he e astern p art
o f
o n
t he v arieties were
m ore
d istant
m ade ,
s ites .
b ut
t hey
Most b elong
o f t he c ountry
a nd t heir p rototypes
t o
t he
f ourth
c entury,
b ut m uch e arlier e xamples o r p rototypes a re k nown". I t
i s- noteworthy
a t
C aistor-by-Norwich .
" There
i s
t hat
v irtually
t he Anglo S axons" P rototypes
n o R omano-Saxon ware was
n o
s ocial
c ontact
i n p ottery
t he
c emetery
a nd
f or R omano-Saxon ware a re n ot e asy t o f ind;
i f
1 973,
t he
i n
R omano-British
( Myres a nd G reen
b etween
f ound
1 3).
a ny o f t he c haracteristic R omano-Saxon f eatures a re p resent, t he p ot i s h ailed a s R omano-Saxon ware . A n umber o f R omano-Saxon f eatures a re p resent was
t he
o n R oman s ilver ware
p rototype
f or
a nd
R omano-Saxon
i t
i s
ware ,
p ossible t he
t hat
i nfluence
s uch
s ilver
b eing
d irect
a nd within t he Empire . I n
1 961,
c oncluded u sage 1 961,
H awkes p ublished a paper o n l ate R oman b elt-fittings a nd t hat
t he H awkes
a nd d ated f rom 4 0-1).
a nd D unning
c irca AD
t ypes
I t o V were
f or
3 70 i nto t he f ifth c entury
military ( Hawkes
T here i s n o evidence t hat t he p eople who were buried
1 60
c lose b y t he h ill f ort o f F urfooz i n B elgium b elonged t o o ne o f t he u nits o f l aeti r ecorded i n t he N otitia ( Oc. c h . X LII) a s H awkes m aintains, n or t hat t he c hip-carved m etalwork a ssociated with t hem was u sed s olely b y s oldiers i n t he l ate R oman Army who were o f G erman o rigin . I n B ritain a n u nfortunate c onsequence o f t his h as b een t hat c hip-carved o r p lain b elt material has b een h eld t o r epresent p resence o f G ermans, e ither i n t he r egular a rmy o r , m ore l ikely, l aeti
o r
t he a s
f oederati .
T here a re t wo p roblems p osed b y t he m etalwork ' : f irstly, was i t w orn e xclusively b y G ermans a nd i s h ence a n i ndicator o f t he p resence o f l aeti o r f oederati within t he Empire, o r was i t worn e xclusively b y t he military? i .e., d oes i t i ndicate t he p resence o f t he r egular a rmy? T he f ormer p roblem i s t he e asier t o s olve. T he t ype o f d ecoration o f t hese b elt-fittings i s d irectly i nfluenced b y l ate R oman a nd c lassical a rt. K och has s hown t hat b uckles o f g roups I d, I IIa a nd V a re f ound widely i n t he l ate f ourth a nd e arly f ifth c enturies, b oth within a nd o utside t he Empire , b ut t hat t hose p roduced w ithin t he Empire a re t he e arlier i n d ate . Most s cholars b elieve t hat m uch o f t he m aterial was m ade i n s tate m ilitary f actories , t hough t he e vidence f or t his i s s lim . S ome t ypes d o , h owever , s eem t o h ave b een m ade i n c ertain a reas a nd i t i s l ikely t hat t he buckles o f i nferior d esign were made i n i mitation o f f iner p ieces, t hemselves p ossibly m ade i n s tate f actories ( Simpson C . 1 971). I t has b een s uggested t hat a b uckle f rom G estinthorpe o f c hip-carved t ype may h ave b een m ade o n t he s ite Punnet 1 975 , 1 38 ) . B uckles o f g roups I d a nd h a a re o nly f ound i n B ritain ;
t hey were p resumably made t here .
T he l ate Roman A rmy was made u p o f b arbarians,
t hose o f b arbarian
e xtraction a nd p rovincials - t hough t he l atter s eem t o have b en i n t he majority . P rosophographical r ecords f rom t he l ate E mpire s uggest a G erman o rigin f or a bout 1 5% o f western f ourth-century o fficers a nd s uggest t hat G ermans o f o ther r anks were p roportionately f ewer ( Morris J . 1 974 , 2 29) . I t would s eem u nlikely t hat s tate m ilitary f actories would
p roduce b elt-fittings
s pecifically f or
t he s oldiers
o f
t he
r egular a rmy who were G ermans . T hat t hese f ittings were n ot p roduced o nly f or t he l aeti and f oederati o f c ommon p arlance i s i ndicated b y t heir a ssociation with Zwiebelkopflibeln ( onion-headed) b rooches. T hese b rooches a re t hought t o h ave b een r estricted t o u se b y m embers o f t he imperial a dministration a nd were p robably p roduced i n t he s tate f actories
o f P annonia a nd I llyricum .
Myres a rgued f or t he p resence o f A lamanni i n Y orkshire i n t he l ate R oman p eriod a nd s uggested t hat t he h illfort o f A lmondbury c ould well h ave b een o ccupied a s t he h eadquarters o f l aeti . H is e vidence f or a n A lamannic p resence i s v ery t enuous: a n Alamannic s pearhead f rom D riffield , a r are f ourth-century A lamannic b rooch f rom a s ixth-century i nhumation a t L ondesborough n ear S ancton, p ottery o f F rankish c haracter a nd p lace n ames which i nclude ' Almond' ( Myres 1 969, 7 5). There
i s
no
e vidence
t hat
a nnular
brooches
L ondesborough a re s pecifically c onnected with
l ike
t hat
f rom
t he A lamanni - t hey a re
f ound o ver a wide a rea f rom Y ugoslavia t o t he N orth S ea . T he r ange a ssigned t o t his e xample i s a lso t oo s pecific; i t c ould f rom before c irca AD 2 60 i nto t he migration p eriod ( Todd 1 975, T hat A lmondbury i s d erived f rom A lamanni i s u nlikely; t he n ame
d ate d ate 3 88). m ust
h ave o riginated l ater t han R oman t imes a nd t here i s n o e vidence f or t he Alamanni h aving b een a n i dentifiable t ribe i n E ngland i n t he
1 61
Anglo-Saxon
p eriod
( Swanton
1 967,
4 8-9).
I n
t he
a ppendix
t o
Swanton's a rticle, Myres d ates t he p ottery o f F rankish c haracter t o c irca A D 5 30 a t t he e arliest . O nce t he a bove t o
s uggest
i nformation i s t aken i nto a ccount,
t he presence
T he p resence o f
o f
l arge g roups
o f
t here i s n o e vidence
barbarians
i n Britain .
i ndividual o r small n umbers o f b arbarians o f a ny t ribe
i n u nits o f t he a rmy i s t o b e e xpected b ut t hese m en would p resumably b e i ndistinguishable f rom a ny o ther s oldier i n t he u nit o f w hich t hey h appened t o b e a member. Myres has s uggested t hat l aeti p layed a n i mportant p art i n t he d efence o f e astern B ritain : T he A nglo-Saxon c emeteries b urial p laces
i n e astern E ngland
o f barbarian l aeti,
b rought
" must
h ave b egun a s
t he
i n with t heir wives a nd
f amilies d uring t he l ast d ays o f R oman r ule a nd d eliberately p lanted i n e astern B ritain t o a ct a s r einforcements t o, o r a s s ubstitutes f or , more r egular g arrisons i n i nvasion" ( Myres 1 969 , 7 4) .
t he
p rotection
I n t he a bsence o f t hese l aeti, h interland o f I f
t he
t he l itus
c hip-carved
t he military, d iocese,
t hough
t he
p rovince
were r egular t roops s tationed in t he
p lain
b elt-fittings
t he presence
more
c ommonly
o f
were
e xclusively
s uch metalwork
f ound
i n
t he
worn b y
t hroughout
l owland
i ndicate t hat t roops were s tationed i n t hese a reas. s oldiers
against
S axonicum?
a nd
t hen
o f
z one,
t he
would
T hat regular
d id wear t his e quipment i s v ery l ikely - s oldiers o n t he A rch
o f C onstantine i n R ome a re d epicted wearing wide b elts with p ropellers haped s trengtheners.
S uch e quipment h as been f ound o n numerous
o ccasions i n o r b y military i nstallations,
e specially o n t he S axon
S hore, but a lso i n t he north a t Doncaster ( Buckland and D olby 1 972), G reta B ridge ( Hawkes 1 974), Maryport ( Jarrett 1 976),
York ( Sumpter
a nd C oll 1 975), C arrawburgh ( Clarke 1 979, 2 85) and a t o ther s ites o n H adrian's Wall ( pers. c omm. Mr.R . Miket). Two p ossible amphoras haped s trap-ends
o f S impson's
t ype b ( Simpson C .
1 976,
f ig.4) have
b een f ound a t C hester ( Droop a nd N ewstead 1 931B, p l .XLVII A n o nion-headed g ilt b ronze b rooch c ame f rom C aernarvon .
5 0
a nd
5 2) .
I t h as b een s uggested t hat b elt-fittings a nd c ross-bow b rooches f ormed p art o f t he c ingulum militiae. A s c ivil o fficials were a lso g iven military r ank ,
t he f inding o f s uch c ingula c ould e qually well i ndicate
t he p resence
o f
a c ivil
o fficial r ather t han a s oldier.
I n s ome
c ases, b elt-fittings o f p resumed military t ype a re f ound i n f emale b urials . S impson s uggests a n umber o f p ossibilities t o e xplain t his : t he women may h ave b een a ccorded t he s ame s tatus a s t heir h usbands a nd t hus have b een e ntitled t o t he s ame f ittings a nd b een a llowed t o r etain t he i nsignia o f g ained
t heir h usbands when w idowed;
o r t hey may h ave
t heir a rticles b y t rade a nd h ave h eld n o o fficial s tatus .
F or
t heir o ccurrence i n c hildren's g raves, he s uggests t hat p erhaps t he h ereditary o bligations m eant t hat m ale o ffspring were e ntitled t o wear t he i nsignia o f
t heir
f ather's
o ffice
o r s tatus
( Simpson C .
1 971).
I t would make most s ense t o s uggest t hat i n o bviously n on-official c ontexts,
military-style b elt-fittings
b eing u sed b y s tyles
o f
c ivilians.
o rnament,
t he
Among ' free' G ermans, were
worn b y
women a s
and
c ross-bow brooches
were
O nce t he military t ook t o wearing s uch
f ashion
c ould h ave i nfluenced
c ivilian
u sage .
b elts with b uckles o f Hawkes and D unning t ype well a s
m en
1 62
( Clarke
1 979,
2 89) .
T he p resence
o f l arge n umbers o f b elt-fittings o f t his t ype i n v illas t hroughout B ritain s hould i n i tself i ndicate t hat wearers n eed h ave n o m ilitary o r o fficial s tatus. I n t he t owns where t here would h ave b een c ivilians, c ivil o fficials a nd p ossibly s oldiers, i t would b e d ifficult t o t ell c ivilian o rnaments f rom c ingulum m ilitiae . C larke s uggests t hat o nly t he wide b elts
w ith d ouble s traps
a nd t hose
w ith t he l avish-type I VA b uckles a nd d ecorative p lates s hould b e t hought o f a s m ilitary, t hough b uckles o f t ype H A ( whilst n ot a lways p art o f a two-strap b elt) may a lso have b een u sed b y t he military. A s s ingle-strap b elts o f t ype I IA i n f orm a nd c onstruction c losely I mitate C ontinental t wo-strap b elts , h e b elieves t hat t hese b elts a lso h ad s ome military s ignificance . b eing 6 03) .
T his
i s a lso s uggested b y
( N o
f ound i n b urials a ssociated w ith k nives a t L ankhills T he i nsular d istribution o f t ype I IA b uckles s uggests
t heir
9 2 a nd t hat t he
wearers were n ot r egular s oldiers who would t end t o b e moved o ut o f t he d iocese ( Clarke 1 979 , 2 90) . O n t he i nsignia o f
t he v icarius o f B ritain i n t he Notitia ( 0c .
c h .
X XIII) t he p rovinces o f h is d iocese a re s hown n ot a s maidens, a s i n o ther i nsignia, b ut a s f ortified e nclosures. F rere s uggested t his i mplies t hat t he v icarius had t roops under h is c ommand, p resumably c ity g arrisons. H e c onnects t his with t he p resence o f ' military' b elt-fittings i n t he t owns o f B ritain
( Frere
s uggested t hat
p art o f t he g arrison's d uty
t owns were g arrisoned,
1 978,
3 99).
H awkes
b eing t o d efend t he villas i n t he c ountryside . S he s ees t he r igid d istribution o f t he m etalwork a cross t he Midlands a s r epresenting a n i nner ' frontier' - a r eserve l ine o f d efence s hould t he n orth f all . T his f orce would b e s emi-mobile - a s ort o f y eomanry ( Hawkes 1 961, 4 1). C larke's
wearers
o f
t ype
I IA b uckles,
h e
s uggests,
w ere
t roops
u nder
t he v icarius c ommand - a f orce u nique i n t he Empire - d rawn f rom t he p rovinicals u nder h is j urisdiction i n t he c ivil z ones o f B ritain . H e d ates t he c reation o f s uch a f orce o n t he e vidence o f t he L ankhills b urials N o .92 a nd 6 03 t o t he m id-fourth c entury a nd l asting t ill a fter A D 4 00 o n t he e vidence o f t he N otitia ( Clarke 1 979 , 2 91) . T hese t wo b urials f orm p art o f a g roup o f 1 6 s uch b urials o f which C larke w rites: c onsistent l ayout was u nlike t hat i n e arlier o r c ontemporary g raves a t L ankhills" .
I t
was
s eemingly
f aithfully
a dhered t o i n t he e arliest o f
t he
1 6
g raves, s ome o f w hich were c oin d ated t o c irca A D 3 50-70 . B ut t hose a mong t hem d efinitely d atable a fter c irca A D 3 70 r evealed e vidence f or b reakdown a nd v ariation , a nd f or t he a bsorption o f p ractices t ypical o f o ther o bviously n ative g raves. I n t hese c ircumstances, i t was a rgued t hat t he 1 6 g raves c ould o nly b e e xplained a s t he b urials o f p eople f oreign t o W inchester who were g radually b eing a ssimilated i nto t he Roman p opulation ( ibid, 3 77). T he e xcavator t hinks t hat t hese p eople were S armatians f rom o utside t he Empire : " Although
t here a re
c ertainly s ome d ifferences
L ankhills' g raves a re perhaps a s c emeteries a s e lsewhere" ( ibid 3 85) .
1 63
c losely
i n f unerary r ites, p aralleled
i n
t he
t hese
A m ilitary
f orce u nder a c ivil o fficial
i s a t
I n r are i nstances i n t he f ourth c entury,
t his d ate v ery u nlikely .
c ivil and military duties
were i nvested i n o ne man, e .g. t he d ux e t p raeces i n I sauria a nd a lso o n o ccasion i n A rabia a nd T ripolitania. T here i s no e vidence t o s uggest a n a nomalous p osition f or t he v icarius o f B ritain . H e had a f ull c omplement o f military c ommanders i n h is d iocese . t o b e g arrisoned, t hese men . On
t he
s uch f orces would b e u nder t he c ommand o f one o f
C ontinent,
a ssociation
barbarian
with
I ron
g rave
g oods,
c emeteries
Age
r efurbished a t t hat t ime. t heir
I f t owns were
t hese
hillforts
a re
o ften
which
f ound
had
i n
t heir
c lose
d efences
J ohnson s uggests t hat o n t he e vidence o f
p eople
r egarded
t hemselves
a s
s oldiers,
y et
t hey a re o ften p laced o n t he l and t o f arm i t and, i n t ime o f d anger, t o d efend i t t his
k ind
C issbury
( Johnson J .
i s
a t
a nd
r efortified
Highdown
i n
1 980A,
F urfooz.
t he
1 34-5).
I n
have,
o n
R oman
p eriod
l ate
A well-known c emetery
B ritain
t he
o ccasion, a nd
hillforts
b een
o f
c laimed
g arrisoned .
A t
r efortified .
d ated
t o
t he
H ighdown
O f
H ill,
w ith
s ome p ermanence o f J .
1 976A,
house
1 51).
d ated
e xcavator b uildings s ome
i ts
l ay
p eriod i ts
( Wilson
R oman
o ccupation , T his t hat
s outh
b ath-house p erhaps
J ohnson
n earby,
t o
a nd west
o f
g arrison
( Johnson
E xcavation o f t he bath-
e arly
s econd
c entury.
t he b ath-house which i n
t hat
i ndicated
t he
l ater
T he
t races o f
went o ut
( Burstow a nd Wilson 1 939).
t he hillfort
a t
s ite
i t was a ll
p ossibly
b y a r egular
t he
t he
s uggested
i t was a ssociated with a villa;
t he t hird c entury
r eoccupation o f
1 939) .
i s hardly l ikely.
c onstruction
t hought
a t t he e nd o f
t he v ery l ittle R oman p ottery f ound,
c onquest
being
C oburn ,
s ome d ate b etween t he R oman c onquest a nd t he t welth c entury , was
Coburn, a s
t hird
o f
u se
T here was c entury
- a
s hallow d itch had been d ug a nd a hut c onstructed, i n a p ost-hole o f which were t wo worn c oins o f V ictorinus a nd T etricus .
Myres makes n o
mention o f f ourth-century S axon p resence o n t he s ite ( Myres J ohnson c entury
c onnects
t he
r efortification o f
r e-use o f h illforts
I n t he West a nd i n Wales, m aterial, f or
i n t he s outh w est
r easons
with
( Johnson J .
t he
1 969). fifth-
1 980A ,
1 60 ) .
many h illforts y ield l ate Romano-British
b ut t he o ccupation o f
d efensive
C issbury
( cf .
t hese s ites d oes n ot s eem t o h ave b een
B urrow
1 979 ,
2 15) .
T here d oes n ot a ppear t o have b een any p olicy o f s ettling b arbarian g roups within B ritain t o a id i n t he d efence o f r ural s ites o r i n t he t owns, c ontrol,
i .e.
i nto t he f irst d ecade o f
b arbarian g roups
d o
mercenaries,
t his
b ut
s eem
t he d iocese ,
t he
f ifth
c entury.
t o have b een b rought i nto
n eed n ot
c urrent u nder t he Romans.
w hether o n
a t l east while t he i sland was u nder Roman
r eflect
Later,
t he c ountry a s
a s ituation
t hat had
T he military d efence o f Britain in t he
f ourth c entury would s eem t o h ave r ested w ith t he r egular R oman a f air
p roportion
t hroughout
o f
i ts
been
s oldiers
t he R oman o ccupation o f
1 64
b eing n on-Romans, B ritain .
a s
t hey h ad
a rmy, b een
C ONCLUSION
L ittle c an b e c oncluded i n g eneral f rom t he a bove work . A t n o f ort i s t here s ufficient a rchaeological e vidence t o s uggest w ith c onfidence a history f or t he whole f ort, l et a lone a whole r egion . G eneral t rends c an b e n oted . D uring t he t hird c entury t here was a s hift o f e mphasis f rom d efence o f t he north t o t hat o f t he s outh a nd e ast c oasts, c aused p resumably a s much b y t he p eaceful c ondition o f t he n orthern f rontier a s b y t he d anger f rom s ea r aiders. What happened i n t he n orth i n t he l ater t hird c entury i s f ar f rom c lear. T he d efences o f s ome f orts a nd a n umber o f o fficial b uildings were n eglected, b ut e vidence f rom t he b arrack a reas i s o ften m ore ambiguous . W hether t his m eans t hat f orts w ere a ctually a bandoned b y t he m ilitary o r t hat d iscipline was a llowed t o l apse i s u ncertain . Administrative b uildings may have b een p rovided i n s ome o f t he f orts b uilt o n t he S axon S hore a t t his t ime . I n t he e arly f ourth c entury t hey were c ertainly d eemed n ecessary i n t he n orth a nd t he e vidence a dministrative f unction .
s uggests
t hat
t hey
r etained
t heir
W ithin s ome f orts t here i s c lear e vidence f or t he p resence o f a l arge n umber o f women . P resumably t hese were t he wives o f o rdinary s oldiers, n ot j ust t he wife o f t he f ort c ommandant a nd p ossibly t he wives o f t he c enturions, a s may e arlier h ave b een t he c ase . T heir p resence m ay w ell h ave b een c onnected with t he b uilding o f c halets i n s ome f orts, p ossibly f or t he h ousing o f f amily g roups. We h ave n o e vidence f or t he s ize o f m ilitary u nits i n B ritain i n t he f ourth c entury; g arrisons must h ave b een g reatly r educed, a t l east i n t he f orts w here c halets were p rovided, i f a ll t he t roops l ived within t he walls. T he f ort a t H ousesteads, o riginally d esigned t o h old a m illiary c ohort, may o nly h ave h oused a g arrison o f 1 50 men b y t he e arly f ourth c entury . T his c orresponds well with D uncan-Jones' i nterpretation
o f
t he
B eatty
p apyrus;
t he
m oney p ayments
t o
t roops
r ecorded i n t his d ocument ( dated t o t he t ime o f D iocletian) would s uggest t hat a u nit o f e quites s aggitarii c onsisted o f c irca 1 20 m en , a n a uxiliary c ohort b eing i n t he o rder o f 1 60 m en ( Duncan-Jones 1 978 , 5 47). Within t he f orts o n t he S axon S hore, h uts which may h ave held f amily units have b een f ound . c ontaining
t hese b uildings
i s
Although n o c omplete p lan o f a f ort a vailable ,
i t
i s
l ikely
t hat
l ittle
o f
t hese f orts was c overed b y b uildings. T hough l arger t han most e arlier f orts i n t he n orth, t heir g arrisons may h ave b een l ittle d ifferent, e specially i f t hey a lso had t o h ouse t he i nstallations c onnected with t he f leets b ased o n t hem. Many o f t he S axon S hore f orts p robably h ad i nternal b ath-houses; t he p rincipia a t B rancaster, L ympne a nd R eculver a re m uch l arger t han s imilar b uildings i n e arlier f orts.
1 65
T he
l egionary
d ifficult
t o
g arrison
o f
a scertain .
B y
B ritain t his
i n
t ime
t he
f ourth
l egions
c entury
were
i s
f requently
very s plit
u p i nto vexillations a nd s tationed i n s eparate f orts on a p ermanent b asis.
Most o f t he l egions known t o have b een i n e xistence in t he
f ourth c entury were s o s plit u p - ap rocedure which may h ave become s tandard p ractice a s e arly a s t he t ime o f D iocletian .
T he s ize o f
t hese
t he ancient
u nits
s ources
- which
- h as
b een
a re
o ften
g enerally
l oosely r eferred
a ccepted
a s
b eing
i n
t o
i n
t he
o rder
o f
1 ,000
m en . S uch a u nit c ould e asily h ave b een a ccommodated within t he f ort a t R ichborough i f i t was housed i n s econd-century s tyle b arrackb locks; t he l egio
t here i s n o e vidence f or t hese a t t his f ort .
T he p refect
I I A ugusta was s tationed h ere i n t he N otitia .
d rawn p robably f rom t he I I A ugusta ,
O ther
o f
units,
a re k nown e lsewhere i n t he Empire .
O f t he XX V aleria V ictrix a nd t he V I V ictrix we hear nothing:
t he
f ormer i s l ast a ttested o n t he l egionary c oinage o f C arausius whilst t he l atter, t hough n ot r ec3rded o n t hese, i s i n t he N otitia O c c h X L s tationed a t
S extae.
A t C hester, where t he XX i s a ttested in t he
mid-third c entury, much o f t he f ortress was d evoid o f b uildings t hroughout t he f ourth c entury, a lthough t he d efences were p ossibly r efurbished a round AD 3 00 .
T he evidence f rom York i s
l ess c lear;
t he d efences were e xtensively r ebuilt i n t he f ourth century and t he p rincipia was
maintained i n g ood r epair u p
t o
t he
e nd o f
t hat
c entury
a nd p robably w ell b eyond . I t has l ong b een t hought t hat f rontier
g arrisons,
t he
i n B ritain,
l imitanei,
were
a s e lsewhere,
l ittle
m ore
t he s tatic
t han
a m ilitia :
v ery l ow-calibre t roops who s pent m ore t ime f arming t han a ttending t heir military d uties.
T hcre a re a n umber o f problems with
i nterpretation .
T hat t he l imitanei were l ower g rade
t hose i n t he
a rmy
c lear. were
f ield
c omitatenses
A ccording t o a l aw o f A D
e nrolled
enrolled
i n
i n
m ain
t he
t he
received more p rivileges. T he
( the
c omitatenses
l imitanei pay
e vidence
and
c ited
A .
t he
t hat
t he
c entury were a k ind o f h ereditary p easant
6 17). and
s oldiers h eirs t hey
o f
t he
s erved , w ould
l imes
a nd
s erve
o n
l imitanei
m ilitia
c aptured f rom
c ondition
t hat
s hould n ever b elong with
g reater
z eal i f
i s
i t
t he
were
C omitatenses
also
i s
H istoria A ugusta V ita S even i A lexandri which r ecords " Severus A lexander g ave l and
t han
i nferior s pecimens
1 973,
donatives
i ndicate
t roops
c omitatenses)
r ecruits o f b etter p hysique
whilst
( Jones
larger
t o
3 79,
a nd p seudo
t o
t his
had
o f
g reater
t he
a p assage
f ourth i n
t he
t he d uces
a nd
t hat:
e nemy
s hould b e
t o
t heirs
t o p rivate p ersons, t hey were a lso
i f
s aying
d efending
t heir t hat t heir
own f ields" ( ch.58). T his
l ife
i s g enerally r egarded a s b eing p ure f antasy a nd
c an o ffer n o
evidence f or t he s ituation e ither u nder S everus A lexander o r a t t he t ime o f writing, t he D igest,
p robably u nder C onstantine
A emilius Macer ,
( Jones A .
1 973,
6 50).
I n
a j urist w riting u nder S everus A lexander ,
s tated t hat: " Troops were f orbidden t o h old l and e ither t hemselves o r u nder a nother name i n t he p rovince i n which t hey were o n a ctive f arming t hey s hould l ose
t heir m ilitary p reparedness"
s ervice
l est
i n
( XLIX,XVI.13).
I n t he e ast l imitanei d o s eem t o have b een g iven l and i n t he fifth c entury.
T his
i s f irst r ecorded i n a l aw o f A D
1 66
4 23.
L imitanei would p resumably h ave b een l ower g rade t roops, s till a r egular t hese
f ighting
f orce .
C asey p ointed o ut
t roops were s tationed i n o ne p lace
b ut t hey were
t hat
j ust
b ecause
d oes n ot m ean t hat t hey were
l ess e fficient t han a nyone e lse ( Gillam 1 974A, 6 ). O ccasionally, when l imitanei were u nable t o a dequately d efend a n a rea, t hey were r einforced o ccasions
by
c ontingents
t hey
d rawn
f rom
t he
f ield
a rmy
c ould a ssume a n o ffensive r ole.
a nd
o n
a ccompanied J ulian i nto P ersia whilst t he l imitanei u nder h is p resumably went w ith h im
( Crump
1 973) .
r are
T he d ux O srhoenae c ommand
U nits o f l imitanei c ould a lso
b e u pgraded i nto t he f ield a rmy, a s were t he S eguntienses f rom C aernarvon a nd C alcarienses, p ossibly f rom Tadcaster . T hey were n ormally u pgraded a s p seudo c omitatenses but u pgraded a s c omitatenses. c entury; 1 965, 3 4,
o f
u nits, f or
t hat
t he
c unei a nd a uxilia h ad b y A D
t he a lae a nd c ohortes
a nd
t ogether with t he l egions,
t he a lae a nd c ohortes
M acMullen
c onvincingly
( Mann
a rgued
were k nown
a s
e ven
3 25 a s tatus a bove
r iparienses .
T hese
were t o a ct a s m obile s upport t roops 1 977,
t hat
1 1) .
s oldiers
d id e ngage i n f arming a nd
h e c ites evidence a s e arly a s Tacitus f or t his. h owever,
s ometimes
Aetius i ncorporatd l imitanei i nto h is f ield a rmy ( Salway f n.1).
Mann b elieves t hat
were
T his p ractice c ontinued i nto t he f ifth
I t
i s
a b ig s tep,
f rom t his t o s uggest t hat t hese men were s oldier-farmers.
M acMullen g oes o n t o n ote: " Mention i n t he Notitia D ignitatum o r i n t he C odes o f l imitanei on t his a t
o r t hat b order c annot b e t aken a t
i ts
f ace v alue .
t ime r egular s oldiers r elying o n t he L imitanei r eceived
s tate
f or
t heir a nnona a nd p ay, a s
t heir
e xpected
t o
B ritain ,
p rovable m ore
a t
i n
d espite
d rastic r eduction i n g arrison s trength ,
w idespread)
AD
3 67,
t he
f orts t he
with
c halet-type
n orthern
f rontier
t he
Wall
d oes
n ot
e nter
t he
a ccommodation
s till
c ontinued
b ut t o
W hatever t he t ruth o f
s eem
t his would s uggest t hat
a ttempting t o
t o
have
m ilitary
p rovide
a n
s uffered.
I f
i t
was
i t s till f ormed a b arrier t o r aiders
d iocese b y
e stablishments,
( only
p ossibly
t he i nvasion
l and.
A lthough i n t he f ourth
c entury s oldiers' f amilies p robably l ived i nside t he f orts, s till
a nd w ere
I n Noricum t hey s till
i n A D 4 60 .
t hose
t hem f ull-
s upplies" .
r eceive p ay
i mpenetrable b arrier t o i nvasion . b ypassed,
b ut
d id o ther t roops,
g ranted l and o r a c ash bounty o n d ischarge.
I n
S ome o f
l east - a nd a pparently most - were n ot merely p art-time,
n ot
f ortified v illages .
t hese w ere
T he m en w ere
s oldiers a nd a s s uch were maintained b y t he s tate . T hroughout p ressure
t he with
f ourth which
c entury Britain
we
hear
was
o f
t he
g rowing
faced.
The
b arbarian
a bsence
o f
a rchaeologically a ttested d estruction within t he d iocese s uggests t hat t he a ncient o r
t hat
a ccounts
o f
b arbarian a ttacks
o n B ritain were e xaggerated
t he a rmy o f o ccupation was n otably s uccessful .
c entury, t he military c onsiderably l ess t han
B y t he f ourth
e stablishment o f B ritain must have b een i t h ad b een i n t he f irst, s econd a nd e arly
t hird c enturies. I n t he f irst half o f t he f ourth c entury, a n umber o f f orts which had b een h eld e arlier were p ossibly a bandoned, i ncluding t he o utpost f orts n orth o f H adrian's o nly p rovided w ith a r egional f ield a rmy a t
1 67
Wall .
T he d iocese was
t he v ery e nd o f t he f ourth
c entury o r e arly i n t he f ifth . O n t he o ccasions i n t he f ourth c entury when f ield a rmy u nits were n eeded i n B ritain , o nly a f orce o f p erhaps 2 ,000 m en was d ispatched . I n B ritain , R oman c ontrol c eased , n ot b ecause t he a rmy w as u nable t o a dequately d efend t he d iocese b ut b ecause i t was progressively withdrawn t o f urther t he ambition o f u surpers o r t o h elp i n t he d efence o f I taly .
1 68
A PPENDIX
1
T HE C HRONOLOGY O F T HE S TONE F ORTS A ND V ICI A T C HESTERHOLM
T he
f irst
s tone
f ort
o n
t he
s ite
a nd
t he
vicus
( vicus
I )
were
o riginally d ated t o t he t ime o f S everus, f ollowing t he Wall p eriod s cheme. R . B irley has n ow d ated t he f irst s tone f ort t o c irca A D 1 63,
i ts b uilding r eflecting t he f inal withdrawal o f R oman f orces f rom
t he
Antonine
W all a nd m uch o f
S cotland .
T his
would
t ie
i n with
t he
work r ecorded o n R IB 1 703 . V icus I was f or a t ime t hought t o b e c ontemporary with t his f ort, b ut t his i s h ighly u nlikely s ince t he main r oad t hrough t he vicus d oes n ot head f or t he f ort's west g ate. T his
would b e v ery
u nusual
i f i t i s a ssociated with a nd t herefore
c ontemporary o r s lightly l ater t han t he f ort. v icus
n ormally
g ateways.
I b uildings
- t hat
c ertain
u p
a long
t he
r oads
l eading
f rom
t he
f ort's
R . B irley h as now s uggested - d ue t o t he unusual p lan o f
t he vicus v icus
g row
T he buildings o f a
a nd
t he p rovision o f
i t a nte-dates s tone f ort
e xtent
t o c irca A D f unction.
t he
s amian e vidence,
1 40 .
I f
t his
i s
I .
s uggest
t he c ase ,
a c lay r ampart f or t he
T he c oin e vidence, t hat
a nd t o a
t he ' vicus' m ay
d ate
i t must h ave h ad s ome o fficial
N o d ate h as b een s uggested f or t he e nd o f ' vicus' I .
T he c ircular
s tructures
n ot
b eneath
t he
e xtant
f ort's
n orth
wall
d o
h ave
a ny
c onnection with t he v icus - t hey l ay within t he p eriod I s tone f ort ( pers. c omm. Mr. P . Bidwell). V icus I a ppears t o have been s ystematically d emolished a nd t he a rea t idied
u p.
T hen
When v icus buildings n ormal
f ollowed
I I was b uilt, were
t ype .
markedly
d ifferent.
t he period I I s tone f ort.
a s
I t must
H adrianic
o f
d isuse
V icus
T he main r oad t hrough i t
f rom c irca A D 2 70 .
a p eriod
s tone
must
f ort
p ottery
b egun
m uch
with which
g roups
v icus
s ite.
I I was
a vicus
o f
t he
V icus I I has, u ntil r ecently, b een d ated
h ave
I I
t he
i s a ligned o n t he w est g ate o f
2 70 o nwards, b ut R . B irley n ow d ates
c learly
o f
t he s tyle o f c onstruction and t he t ype o f
e arlier
i t
i s
i n
i ts e nd t o c irca A D t he
t hird
a ssociated.
r ecently p ublished
( Hird
c entury,
I n t he p re-
1 977),
t here
i s
a
small n umber o f i ntrusive p ieces which Mr . G illam s uggests w ere i n t he p rimary s ilt o f w hat i n R .
1 973) .
o f
t he
T his d itch ,
s tone
f orts,
1 973 was
c alled t he D iocletianic d itch
which was e xcavated a t
h ad b een d ug
i nto
( Birley
t he s outh-western a ngle
t he p re-Hadrianic
l evels .
Mr .
G illam b elieves t hat t his d itch i s a ssociated with t he p eriod I I s tone f ort. H e d ates t he i ntrusive material ( which s eems t o f orm a n h omogeneous g roup) t o t he e arly t o m id-third c entury a nd s uggests t hat t he d igging o f t he d itch a nd t he b uilding o f t he p eriod a nd vicus, d ate t o t he r eign o f S everus Alexander. i nscription R IB T his
1 706 may r ecord
t his
I I s tone f ort T he b uilding
r ebuilding .
c hronological f ramework would s eem i n t he l ight o f t he r ecent
e xcavations b y Mr. P . B idwell within t he f ort t o be l argely c orrect. T he p ublication o f h is r eport i n t he n ear f uture s hould g o a l ong way t owards e stablishing a b asic
c hronology
a ttendant v ici .
1 69
f or
t he
s tone
f orts
a nd
t heir
A PPENDIX 2
A N OTE O N P OTTERY S UPPLIES T O N ORTHERN M ILITARY S ITES I N T HE F OURTH C ENTURY
D uring t he f ourth c entury t here was a s ignificant c hange i n t he s upply o f p ottery t o R oman military e stablishments i n n orthern B ritain . F rom t he t ime o f H adrian o nwards, with t he c losing o f p ottery workshops which h ad b een s et u p a nd worked b y t he m ilitary, much o f t he p ottery u sed i n t he n orth c ame f rom l arge c ivilian workshops i n t he
Midlands
a nd
t he
s outh .
T hese workshops
a lso
s upplied
t he
c ivilian a reas o f B ritain b ut t hey d id n ot p roduce a ny p ottery t ypes s pecifically f or t he m ilitary m arket . T he b lack-burnished i ndustry o f D orset ( and l ater i ts o utpost a t R ossington B ridge ) met m uch o f t he a rmy's n eeds f or c ooking-pots, b owls a nd d ishes. T he c ompetition f rom t he B B2 i ndustry o f t he s outh e ast, w hich was f irst s een o n t he n orthern f rontier i n t he A D 1 40s, h ad l apsed b y t he m id-third c entury; s upplies o f B B1 c ontinued u nabated, a s d id s upplies o f mortaria a nd f iner wares f rom t he Midlands . During
t he
f irst
t wo
c enturies
o f R oman r ule,
p ottery i ndustries
d erived f rom a l ate I ron A ge t radition c ontinued t o s uppy l ocal n eeds i n e ast Y orkshire, b ut t heir wares d id n ot t ravel f ar f rom t he p roduction e xpanded; f abrics,
t he
c entres. I n much o f t heir m ost
t he f ourth wares were
c ommon b eing
t he
c entury, t hese i ndustries o f c oarse, c alcite-gritted
c ooking-pot .
B y
t he
m id-fourth
c entury, t hese c ooking p ots were t o b e f ound over t he whole o f t he n orthern m ilitary a rea b ut r arely f urther s outh . A t a pproximately t he s ame t ime, t he s upply o f B B1 t o Y orkshire p roducts f illed t he market . T he
t ransition
p roducts t hought
o n
t hat
f rom
a l arge
t he
u se
s cale
o f
h as
t he d isruption o f
B B1 b een
t his a rea c eased a s
t o
t he u se
c losely
o f
d ated .
t he
e ast
e ast Y orkshire I t
h as
b een
t he w estern s ea l anes b y b arbarians
i n
t he A D 3 60s, c ulminating i n t he ' barbarica c onspiratio' o f AD 3 67, s evered t he l ines o f c ommunication b etween t he k iln s ites i n D orset a nd t he m ilitary c onsumers i n t he n orth . I t was, h owever , p robably m ore important t hat t he e ast Y orkshire p roducts, b eing t echnically r etrograde , c ould b e p roduced m ore c heaply a nd c ould b e marketed m uch m ore e conomically o wing
t o t heir p roximity t o
were t hus a ble t o b reak t he v irtual B B1
t he m litary m arket a nd
m onopoly o n t he s upply o f
c ertain f orms o f p ottery . I f o ne a ccepts t his, t hen t he a ppearance o f t he e ast Y orkshire p roducts i n l arge q uantities o ver t he whole o f n orthern B ritain h ad l ittle c onnection with t he b arbarian c onspiracy o f A D 3 67 r ecorded b y Ammianus . T he i nvasion o f A D 3 67 m ay t hus h ave n o
r elevance f or
t he s upply o f p ottery t o t he n orth .
T here i s l ittle i ndependent a rchaeological e vidence f or t he d ating o f t he e mergence o f t he w idely d istributed e ast Y orkshire t ypes . A D 3 67 was f irst g iven i mportance a rchaeologically i n 1 930 w hen C ollingwood a nd B irley f ormulated t he Wall p eriods; i t marked t he e nd o f Wall p eriod I II, s oon b eing f ollowed b y t he T heodosian
1 70
r estoration o f A D
3 68 and t he b eginning o f Wall p eriod IV . b ased
o n
l atest
t he
p eriods
c oin
s ealed
o f
i n
T hese Wall p eriods were
o ccupation f ound a t
a p eriod
I II
B irdoswald
d eposit h ere was
i n
o f
1 929 .
T he
V alentinian I
d ated t o AD 3 64-75. P eriod IV p roduced a c oin o f G ratian AD 3 67-75 a nd a nother d ated t o a fter A D 3 75 . I t has
l ong b een t hought
p ottery
( which
e xclusively
a re
t o
a fter
s panning much o f w ith
t he
t hat
known AD
a n umber o f
t o
have
3 67.
Many
t he f ourth c entury .
i nternal
g roove
o n t he
f orms
b een
made
o ther
o f a t
f orms
e ast Y orkshire C rambeck)
had
d ate
a t ype
l ife
T he c alcite-gritted c ooking-pot
r im,
which
i s k nown a s
t he H untcliff
t ype, has r arely b een f ound i n c ontexts t hought t o p re-date A D 3 67, b ut i s v ery c ommon a fterwards; i ts f lourit h as b een d ated t o A D 3 604 00+ . A n umber
o f
f ragments
o f
t he H untcliff
t ype a nd o ther H untcliff
ware
c ooking-pots c ame f rom t he p eriod I II a nd I V l evels a t B irdoswald. A t
no
o ther military s ite
i n t he n orth c an t he t ransition b etween
p eriods I II and I V ( if t hese Wall p eriods a re a pplicable, o pen t o d oubt) b e c losely d ated . e ast
Y orkshire p roducts
f ix.
T he
g roups;
Huntcliff
b egan t ype
T herefore,
t o
i s
d ominate very
i ts p resence a t t he o utpost
s uggests
t hat
t he Huntcliff
Ammianus' passage
o n
t he
f orts
t ype was
a reani
t he
c ommon
i s
market i n
o f
t he
t ype
i s
r ecorded i t h as
f rom
t hought a nd
d ifficult
t o
f ourth-century
R isingham a nd B ewcastle
o n t he
R isingham
i s
l ate
market before AD t o
o utposts were a bandoned b y C ount T heodosius. B ewcastle,
which i s
t he d ate a t which t he
i ndicate
3 67.
t hat
t he
A s o nly o ne s herd o f
two
a re
b een a ccepted t hat a lthough t he
r ecorded
f rom
t ype was o n t he
market b efore A D 3 67, i ts r arity would s uggest t hat i t had n ot l ong b een i n p roduction a nd s o i ts f irst emergence h as b een d ated t o c irca A D
3 60 .
F or b oth t hese f orts
a rtifact; e arly
t he
f ourth
3 60-70 r ests
c oin s eries
c entury .
i t p rovides b y f ar t he l atest
f rom b oth
T heir
s ites
c ontinued o ccupation
l argely o n t he e vidence o f
d ated
d oes n ot e xtend b eyond t he i nto
t hese s herds.
t he
d ecade
A D
T hat B ewcastle
was h eld well b eyond t he d ate o f t he l atest c oin f ound t here i s c lear o n s tructural g rounds. A c oin o f C onstantine i n g ood c ondition d ated c irca A D i tself O f
3 09-10 w as
s ealed b y
t he d ebris
o f
t he b ath-house
t he p ottery t ypes
f ound b y C order a t
was
t he k iln s ite o f C rambeck,
s ome b y t heir a bsence f rom t he Y orkshire s ignal s tations, t o
which
o verlain b y e arth a nd t hen a nother R oman b uilding .
.h ave
g one
o ut
o f
p roduction b efore
r edating o f
t he s ignal
c orrect,
d ate
t he
A D
o f
s tations 3 67
m ay
c irca AD
t o
t he
t ime
l ose
i ts
s ignificance .
p archment wares - o f which t ypes 5 b,
7 ,
o f
3 67.
w ere t hought I f
Magnus
C asey's
Maximus T he
g roup
i s o f
8 9a nd 1 0 a re a p art - have
n ot b een c laimed t o d ate e xclusively t o a fter A D 3 67 . T he C rambeck mortaria t ype 6 have b een f ound i n e arlier c ontexts, a s have t he h emispherical f langed b owls o f t ypes 5 a nd t hough n ot i n p archment ware, a re very
5 a . T hese l atter t ypes, s imilar i n f orm t o t he
p archment ware t ype 5 b . T ypes
l b,
5 b,
7 ,
8 ,
9 a nd
1 0 a re t hought t o o nly have c ome o nto t he
market a fter t he ' Picts War' . was f ound i n p eriod IV . a lso d ated t o t his p eriod . t ypes
o nly
c ame o n
l ong a fter i t
t he
A t B irdoswald o ne e xample o f t ype l b
E xamples o f most o f t he o ther t ypes were T his evidence would s uggest t hat t hese
m arket
a fter A D
i s impossible t o t ell) .
1 71
3 64 a t B irdoswald I t
i s
i mportant
( though h ow
t o n ote t hat a
t ype
7 a nd a t ype
1 0 were f ound e ither i n p eriod I II o r I V l evels.
I f t he importance o f t he e ast Yorkshire k ilns was d ue t o marketing s uccess o ver t heir B B1 a nd Midland r ivals, t hen we would e xpect a m ore g radual
extension
s uggested . i n
e ast
T his
1 ,
i s
d istribution t he
t han
h as
c ase w ith m any
C alcite-gritted
ware
b ecame
o f
hitherto
b een
t he f orms
m ade
important
f rom
t he
c entury o nwards a nd g radually a ssumed a p osition o f T he C rambeck f langed b owl without t he i nternal w avy l ine , a lso
p archment
ware
and
I t
5 a.
t heir
c ertainly
Y orkshire .
l ate t hird d ominance . t ype
o f
w as
f ound b efore AD
m ortaria
t ype
3 67 o n m ilitary s ites,
6 a nd
t he
i s e xtremely hazardous
h emispherical
t o s uggest
a s are t he
b owls,
t hat
t ypes
t he ' post
5
P ict
War' t ypes d ate e xclusively t o a fter AD 3 67 o n t he e vidence f rom t he o ne s ite o f B irdoswald. H untcliff i n
two
L ikewise,
i t i s n ot d esirable t o d ate t he
t ype t o s oon b efore A D 3 67 o n t he e vidence o f
o f
t he
o utposts
o therwise u ndated . d estruction
i n
where
mid
f ourth-century
i ts o ccurrence occupation
i s
I t i s n ow p roving i mpossible t o f ind e vidence f or
f orts
d atable
t o
A D
3 67
a nd
s o
t here
i s n o way
o f
a scertaining, o n t he i ncomplete a rchaeological e vidence a vailable, whether
t he
a ny f ort i s
l ate f ourth-century p eriod o f
o ccupation i n a b uilding a t
c ontemporary with p eriod I V i n o ne b uilding a t B irdoswald .
All t he ' post P ict War' t ypes were o n t he market i n t he l ater f ourth c entury. T he s upposed importance o f A D 3 67 and C ount T heodosius, however,
i s
p robably
f ourth c entury,
i llusory.
T hroughout
t he f irst h alf o f
t he e ast Yorkshire c ooking-pots,
t he
b owls a nd d ishes
s pread over t he n orth a t t he e xpense o f t he B B1 p roducts, a s d id t he C rambeck
m ortaria
a nd
h emispherical
t he Midland i ndustries . t he
n orth
d ominate
had
t he
L eased
n orthern
B y
f langed b owls
a nd
t he
m arket
e ast
u ntil
Y orkshire
t he
e nd o f
may b e a dvisable t o d ate t he emergence o f t o
t he
f ourth
m id-fourth c entury, c entury .
More
t he
e xpense
d ates
l b, 5 b,
t han
7 , 8 ,
k ilns
t hese
c ontfnued
t he R oman p eriod .
t he H untcliff
a nd t he ' post P ict
e xact
s tate t hat a ll t he t ypes
a t
o f
t he m id-fourth c entury s upplies o f B B1 t o I t
t ype g enerally
War' t ypes s hould
t o
b e
t o t he
l ater
a voided;
t o
9a nd 1 0 c ame o nto t he market
a t t he s ame t ime m ay b e e rroneous . Map
2 ,
which
s hows
o n m ilitary s ites, p resence a t
s ome
o ccupation . o ccasions small
t he d istribution o f was
s ites
t he
l ate p archment-ware
c ompiled m ainly f rom p ublished s ources; n eed n ot
t ypes t heir
i ndicate l ate f ourth-century m ilitary
O ften o nly o ne o r t wo p ieces h ave b een f ound a nd o n many
t he
c oins
numbers
o f
s ignificance).
d o n ot
e xtend
coins
f rom
s o
l ate
s ome
( although
sites
may
i n s ome c ases make
t his
of
t he no
O n s ites p roducing a f air amount o f l ate p ottery,
t hese p archment wares a re c ommon ,
c f .
B irdoswald
1 930;
Malton
1 930 ;
R udchester 1 925, e tc. Map 2 d oes s how t hat t he p roducts o f t he C rambeck k ilns were a ble t o r each t he whole o f t he north. Their a bsence f rom a ny l arge a ssemblage o f f ourth-century p ottery c ould well i ndicate t hat f ew
s herds
t hat s ite was
o f
e ast
n ot
Y orkshire
h eld
i n
p ottery
t he
l ater
have
f ourth
b een
c entury .
n oted
f rom
A
f orts
o utside t he n orthern m ilitary a rea; a H untcliff t ype f ound i ts way t o C aernarvon, a t ype l b t o B rancaster a nd p erhaps a t ype 7 t o C astell C oh en .
T he c omplete a bsence o f
t he
l atest C rambeck t ypes
f rom n orth
o f t he Wall h as b een t aken t o i ndicate a c essation o f Roman c ontrol over t hat a rea, p ower
i n
t he
p erhaps b rought a bout b y t he p resence o f a h ostile
a rea where e arlier
were p hilo-Roman .
1 72
i t h as b een t hought
t hat
t he n atives
L IST O F A BBREVIATIONS
A .J.P.
American J ournal o f P hilology
A .M.
Ammianus M arcellinus
A .A.A. A nt.J.
A nnals o f A rchaeology a nd A nthropology A ntiquaries J ournal
A .A .
A rchaeologia A eliana
1 -5
A .C.
A rchaelolgia C ambrensis
A rch.
C ant.
A rchaeologia C antiana
A rch. J . A rch. N ews
A rchaeological J ournal A rchaeological N ewsbulletin
B .A.R.
B ritish A rchaeological R eports
( Durham 1 963-72, B onn.
J ahr.
C .B.A.
g roup
3 1 972 - )
B onner J ahrbücher
C .A.S.
T ransactions o f
t he C heshire A rchaeological
S ociety C .A.
C urrent A rchaeology
C .B.A.
C ouncil f or B ritish A rchaeology,
C I L
C orpus
C .W.
1 -2
r esearch r eport
I nscriptionum L atinarum
T ransactions o f
t he C umberland a nd W estmorland
A ntiquarian a nd A rchaeological S ociety D .A.J. D .U.J.
D erbyshire A rchaeological J ournal D urham U niversity J ournal
G .A.J.
G lasgow A rchaeological J ournal
H .S.L.C.
T ransaction o f
t he H istoric S ociety o f
L ancashire a nd C heshire I LS.
s ee D essau
1 892-1914
J .B.A.A.
J ournal o f
t he B ritish A rchaeological A ssociation
J .R.S. L ancs.
J ournal o f R oman S tudies A rch.
J .
L .C.A.S.
L ancashire A rchaeological J ournal T ransactions
o f
t he A ntiquarian S ociety o f
L ancashire a nd C heshire L .M.A.S.
T ransactions
o f
t he L ondon a nd M iddlesex
A rchaeological S ociety M ed. A rch. M ont. C oll.
M edieval A rchaeology C ollections .. p ertaining t o M ontgomeryshire
P .L.P.L.S.
P roceedings
o f
t he L eeds P hilosophical S ociety
( Literary a nd H istorical S ection) P .S.A.L. P .S.A.N.
P roceedings 1 -4
o f
P roceedings o f
t he S ociety o f A ntiquaries o f L ondon t he S ociety o f A ntiquaries
o f
N ewcastle u pon T yne R IB
s ee C ollingwood a nd W right
S .A.C.
S ussex A rchaeological C ollections
T .A.A.S.D.N.
1 -2
T ransactions o f
1 965
t he A rchitectural a nd A rchaeological
S ociety o f D urham a nd N orthumberland W .N.F.C. Y .A.J.
T ransactions o f t he W oolhope N aturalists F ield C lub Y orkshire A rchaeological J ournal
B IBLIOGRAPHY
A DDYMAN P V ( 1975)
' Keyhole A rchaeology: 3 ,2 N ov
A DDYMAN P V ( 1976) A LCOCK L ( 1954)
R omans
i n S tone' I nterim
1 975 p p 3 0-3
' York' B ritannia
7 1 976 p p
3 14-5
' Caste n C oh en e xcavations 1 954, a s ummary a ccount' T ransactions o f t he R adnorshire S ociety 2 4 1 954 p p 6 2-75
A LCOCK L ( 1964)
' The D efences a nd G ates
A LCOCK L ( 1971)
A uxiliary F ort' A C 1 13 1 964 p p A rthur's B ritain L ondon 1 971
A LEXANDER J ( 1975)
' The D evelopment
o f C astell C oh en 6 4-96
o f U rban C ommunities:
t he
E vidence f rom C ambridge a nd G reat C hesterford' i n e d R odwick a nd R owley 1 975 p p 1 03-9 A LFÖLDY G ( 1974)
N oricum L ondon a nd B oston
A PPLEBAUM S ( 1971)
T he S eventh C ongress o f R oman F rontier S tudies
A PTED M R ,
A ncient M onuments
1 974
1 967 e d S A pplebaum T el Aviv G ILYARD-BEER R a nd
1 971
a nd t heir I nterpretation P hillimore
1 977
S AUNDERS A D ( 1977) A TKINSON D ( 1928)
T he R oman F ort a t R ibchester 3 rd e dition M anchester
1 928
AUSTEN P S ( 1978)A
' Bewcastle' B ritannia 9 1 978 p 4 21 a nd f ig 8
A USTEN P S ( 1978)B
' Old P enrith' B ritania 9 1 978 p p 4 24-5
B ARTLETT J E ( 1959)
' Brough-on-Noe' J RS 4 9
1 959 p 1 08
B ARTLETT J E ( 1960)
' Brough-on-Noe' J RS 5 0
1 960 p 2 16
B ARTLETT J E a nd
' The R oman F ort a t S caftworth n ear
R ILEY D N ( 1958)
B awtry' T rans T horoton S oc o f N ott's p p
B ELLHOUSE R L ( 1953)
5 3
B ELLHOUSE R L ( 1970)
1 955 p p
3 0-45
' Roman S ites o n t he C umberland C oast C W2 5 5
B ELLHOUSE R L ( 1969)
1 953 p p 4 9-51
' The R oman F ort a t B urrow Walls n ear W orkington' C W2 5 5
B ELLHOUSE R L ( 1966)
1 966 p p
1 966-67'
' Roman S ites o n t he C umberland C oast
1 968-69'
7 0
1 970 p p 9 -47
B IDWELL P T ( 1980)
R oman E xeter:
B IDWELL P T ( 1981)
' Chesterholm' B ritannia ' Milecastle D ept
B IRLEY A R ( 1967)
1 962-3'
3 7-41
' Roman S ites o n t he C umberland C oast C W2 6 9 1 969 p p 5 4-101 C W2
B INNS M ( 1971)
1 958
' The R oman P ost a t W reay H all n ear C arlisle' C W2
B ELLHOUSE R L ( 1955)
6 2
2 4-35
F ortress a nd T own E xeter
3 2 - J une
1 2
1 971'
1 980
1 981 p 3 23,324 I nformation S heet
o f A rch D urham
' Excavations a t C arpow'
i n S tudien z u d en
m ilitärgrenzen R oms; ( Beihefte d er B onner J ahrbücher, B ond 1 9) K öln 1 967 p p 1 -5 B IRLEY A R ( 1969)
B IRLEY A R ( 1971)
T he N inth P ilgrimage o f H adrian's W all 7 -12 S eptember 1 969 K endal 1 969 c ompiled b y A R B irley ' VI V ictrix i n Britain' i n B utler 1 971A p p 8 1-96
B IRLEY A R ( 1974)
' Roman F rontiers a nd R oman F rontier P olicy: r eflections o n R oman I mperialism' T AASDN 3 1 974 p p 1 3-25
B IRLEY A R ( 1981) B IRLEY E ( 1930)
T he F asti o f R oman B ritain O xford
BIRLEY
E( 193 1 )
BIRLEY
E (1932)A
' An introduction t o t he E xcavation o f C hesterholm-Vindolanda' AA4 8 1 931 p p 1 82-212 ' A new Inscription and a Note o n t he G arrisoning o f t he W all" AA4 9 1 932 p p 2 05-15
B IRLEY
E ( 1932)B
' Excavations a t C hesterholm - V indolanda AA4 9 1 932 p p 2 16-21
B IRLEY
E ( 1932)C
' Material f or t he H istory o f R oman B rougham' C W2 3 2 1 932 p p 1 24-40
B IRLEY
E ( 1936)
B IRLEY
E ( 1937)
H ousesteads N orthumberland H aydon B ridge 1 936 ' Fifth R eport o n E xcavations a t H ousesteads'
B IRLEY
E ( 1939)
B IRLEY
E ( 1957)
B IRLEY
E ( 1959)
B IRLEY B IRLEY
E ( 1961) E(1967)
S ome
' Excavations o n H adrian's W all W est o f N ewcastle u pon T yne i n 1 929' AA4 7 1 930 p p 1 43-74
A A4 1 4 1 937 p p
1 931'
1 72-84
' Roman I nscriptions f rom C hesters ( Cilurnum), a n ote o n A la I I A sturum a nd T wo M ilestones' A A4 1 6 1 939 p p 2 37-59 ' Roman G arrisons i n W ales' A C 1 02 1 953 p p 9 -19 C hesters R oman F ort N orthumberland H MSO L ondon 1 959 R esearch o n H adrians W all K endal 1 961 ' Hadrian's Wall a nd i ts N eighbourhood' i n S tudien z u d en m ilitärgrenzen R oms; ( Beihefte d er B onner J ahrbücher , 1 4
B IRLEY R ( 1962) B IRLEY R ( 1970) B IRLEY
' Housesteads V icus,
B IRLEY R ( 1973) B IRLEY R ( 1977)A B IRLEY R ( 1977)B B IRLEY E , J
a nd
H EDLEY W P ( 1932) B IRLEY E , C HARLTON J a nd HEDLEY W P ( 1933) B IRLEY
1 9) K öln 1 967 p p 6 -
1 961' A A4 4 0 1 962 p p
1 17-34
' Excavations a t C hesterbolm - V indolanda' A A4 4 8 1 970 p p 9 7-155
R(1971)
C HARLTON
B ond
E ,
S TANFIELD J A a nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1936) B LÄGG T F C ( 1981)
' Chesterholm R oman F ort ( Vindolanda), N orthumberland' A rch N ews 1 1 1 971 p p 3 -4 F riends o f V indolanda R eport f or 1 973 V indolanda I 1 976 e xcavations I nterim R eport H altwistle 1 977 V indolanda: A R oman F rontier P ost o n H adrian's W all L ondon 1 977 ' Excavations a t H ousesteads i n 1 931' AA4 9 1 932 p p 2 22-37 ' Excavations a t H ousesteads A A4 1 0
i n 1 932'
1 933 p p 8 2-96
' Excavations
a t
C hesterholm-Vindolanda :
t hird r eport' AA4
1 3
1 936 p p
2 21-57
' Architectural p atronage i n t he w estern p rovinces o f t he R oman Empire i n t he t hird c entury' i n K ing a nd H enig 1 981 p p 1 67-88
B LAIR R ( 1895)
H andbook t o t he R oman W all 4 th E dition N ewcastle 1 895, e d R B lair
B OON G C ( 1958) B OON G C ( 1960)
' Caernarvon' J RS 4 8 1 958 p 1 30 ' A T emple o f M ithras a t C aernarvon S egontium' A C 1 09 1 960 p p 1 36-72
B OON G C ( 1972)A
I sca, t he R oman L egionary F ortress a t C aerleon M onmouthshire N at M useum o f W ales 1 972
B OON
G C ( 1972)B
' An I mperial B ronze S tatue a t S egontium' A nt J 5 2 1 972 p p 3 32-3
B OON G C ( 1974)
' Counterfeit C oins i n R oman B ritain' i n Casey a nd R eece 1 974 p p 9 5-172
B OON
G C ( 1975)
' Segontium F ifty Y ears O n; p p 5 2-67
I ' A C
B OON
G C ( 1976)
' Segontium F ifty Y ears O n; 1 25 1 976 p p 4 0-79
I I,
B OON
G C ( 1979)
r eview o f
B OSENQUET R C ( 1904)
1 24 1 975
t he C oins' A C
' Interval T ower S W5 a nd t he S outh-
W est D efences' e tc B ritannia 1 0 1 979 p p 3 83-4 ' The R oman C amp a t H ousesteads' AA2 2 5 1 904 p p 1 93-300
B RANIGAN K ( 1977)
T he R oman V illa i n S outh-West E ngland B radfordo n-Avon 1 977
B RASSINGTON M ( 1967)
' Roman M aterial R ecovered f rom L ittlechester,
BRASSINGTON
M
D erby 1 965' DAJ 8 7 1 967 ( 1975) ' A R eappraisal o f t he
B REEZE D J ( 1968)
Western
B ritannia 6 1 975 p p 6 2-76 ' Excavations a t S outh S hields
E nclave'
1 966 a nd 1 967'
D urham A rch N ewsbulletin n o 5 0 A pril
1 968
B REEZE D J ( 1972)
' Excavations a t t he R oman F ort o f C arrawburgh 1 967-69' AA4 5 0 1 972 p p 8 1-144
B REEZE D J a nd
' Hadrian's W all: S ome p roblems' B ritannia 3 1 972 p p 1 82-208 H adrian's W all L ondon 1 976
D OBSON B ( 1972) B REEZE D J a nd D OBSON B ( 1976) B REWIS P ( 1925)
' Roman R udchester' A A4
B ROWN P D C ( 1971)
' The C hurch a t R ichborough' B ritannia 2 1 971 p p 2 25-31 ' Redhill' B ritannia 5 1 974 p p 4 27-8
B ROWNE D M ( 1974) B RUCE J C ( 1857)
1 1 925 p p
9 3-120
' An A ccount o f t he E xcavations m ade a t t he R oman S tation o f B remenium d uring t he s ummer, 1 855' AA2 1 p p 6 9-85
B RUCE J C ( 1874) B UCKLAND P C ( 1973) B UCKLAND P C a nd D OLBY M ( 1972) B UCKLAND P C a nd
T he W all o f H adrian, t wo l ectures ' Doncaster' B ritannia 4 1 973 p 2 82 ' Doncaster' C A 3 3 J uly 1 972 p p 2 73-8
' Doncaster' B ritannia 7 1 976 p 3 17
MAGILTON J R ( 1976) B URKETT M E ( 1965)
' Recent D iscoveries a t Ambleside' C W2 6 5
B URNHAM B C a nd
1 965 p p 8 6-101 I nvasion a nd R esponse,
J OHNSON H B ( 1979)
R oman B ritain B AR 7 3
t he c ase o f
1 979 e d b y B C B urham
a nd H B J ohnson B URROW I C G ( 1979) B URSTOW G P a nd W ILSON A S
( 1939)
' Roman M aterial f rom H illforts' i n C asey 1 979A p p 2 12-29 ' A R oman B ath, H ighdown H ill,
S ussex'
S AC 8 0 1 939
B URY J B ( 1920)
' The N otitia D ignitatum' J RS
B USHE-FOX J P ( 1926)
' First R eport o n t he E xcavations a t R ichborough, K ent' S oc o f A ntiq o f L ondon R esearch R eport V I
1 926
1 0
1 920 p p 1 31-54
B USHE-FOX J
P
' Second Report o f E xcavations a t R ichborough, K ent' S oc o f A ntiq o f L ondon R esearch R eport V II 1 928
P
' Some N otes o n R oman C oast D efences' J RS 2 2 1 932 p p 6 0-72
( 1928) B USHE-FOX ( 1932)A
J
B USHE-FOX J P ( 1932)B
' Third R eport o n E xcavations a t R ichborough, K ent' S oc o f A ntiq o f L ondon R esearch R eport X 1 932
B USHE-FOX J P
' Fourth R eport o n t he E xcavations o f t he R oman F ort a t R ichborough, K ent' S oc o f A ntiq o f L ondon R esearch R eport X VI 1 949
( 1949)
B UTLER R M ( 1971)A
S oldier a nd C ivilian i n R oman Y orkshire L eicester 1 971 e d R M B utler
B UTLER R M ( 1971)B
' The D efences o f t he F ourth C entury F ortress a t Y ork' i n B utler 1 971A p p 9 7-106
C AMERON H a nd L UCAS J ( 1971-3)
' Tripontium . S econd I nterim R eport o n E xcavations b y t he R ugby A rchaeological S ociety a t C aves I nn n ear R ugby' B irmingham a nd Warwickshire Arch
S oc
8 5
1 971-3
p p 93-144
C ASEY P J ( 1971)
' Excavations a t B recon G aer, 1 971 p p 9 1-101
C ASEY P J ( 1972)
' Caernavon' B ritannia 3 1 972 p p 2 99
C ASEY P J ( 1974)A
' The I nterpretation o f R oman-British S ite F inds i n C asey a nd R eece 1 974 p p 3 7-51
1 970' A C
1 20
1974)B C ASEY P J (
' Excavations O utside t he N orth-East G ate o f
1974)C C ASEY P J (
S egontium' A C 1 23 1 974 p p 5 4-77 ' Caernarvon' B ritannia 5 1 974 p 4 15
1974)D C ASEY P J ( C ASEY P J ( 1978)
C ASEY P J ( 1979)A C ASEY P J ( 1979)B
' A C oin o f V alentinian I II f rom W roxeter: A N ote' B ritannia 5 p p 3 83-86 ' Constantine t he G reat i n B ritain, t he e vidence o f t he C oinage o f t he L ondon M int A D 3 12-314' L MAS S pecial P aper N o 2 1 978 p p T he E nd o f R oman B ritain B AR 7 1
1 81-93 1 979 e d
P J C asey ' Magnus M aximus i n B ritain: A R eappraisal' i n C asey 1 979A p p 6 6-79
C ASEY P J a nd D AVIES J L ( 1976)
' Caernarvon' B ritannia
C ASEY P J a nd D AVIES J L ( 1977)
977 p p 3 56-8 ritannia 8 1 ' Caernarvon' B
C ASEY P J a nd DAVIES J L ( 1978)
978 p p 4 04-6 ritannia 9 1 ' Caernarvon' B
C ASEY P J a nd DAVIES J L ( 1979)
0 ritannia 1 ' Caernarvon' B
C ASEY P J a nd R EECE R ( 1974)
C oins a nd t he A rchaeologist B AR 4 1 974
C ATÄNICIU I B ( 1981)
e d P J C asey a nd R R eece E volution o f t he _ S ystem o f D efence W orks i n
C HARLESWORTH D ( 1965)
R oman D acia B AR S 116 ' Excavations a t P apcastle
C HARLESWORTH D ( 1967)
1 965 p p 1 02-14 ' Preliminary W ork o n t he P ortgate' AA4 4 5
C HARLESWORTH D ( 1975)
1 967 p 2 08 ' The C ommandant's H ouse, H ousesteads' A A5 3 1 975 p p
1 7-42
7 1 976 p 2 92
1 979 p p 2 69-72
1 961-62' C W2 6 5
C HARLESWORTH D ( 1976) C HARLESWORTH D ( 1977) C LARKE G ( 1979) C LAYTON J ( 1855-57) C LAYTON J ( 1866)
' The H ospital, p p 1 7-30
H ousesteads' A AS 4 1 976
' The T urrets o n H adrian's W all' i n A pted, G ilyard-Beer a nd S aunders 1 977 p p 1 3-26 P re-Roman a nd R oman W inchester p art I I: T he R oman C emetery a t L ankhills O xford 1 979 ' Borcovicius p 186
( Housesteads)
.
P SAN I 1 855-57
' Description o f R oman R emains D iscovered n ear P rocolitia, a S tation o n t he W all o f H adrian' A A2 8 1 866 p p 1 -49
C LEERE H ( 1977 )
' The C lassis p p 1 6-19
C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1913) C OLLINGWOOD R G
' Report o n t he E xcavations a t P apcastle, C W2 1 3 1 913 p p 1 31-42
B ritannica' i n J ohnston
1 977A 1 911'
C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1922)A
' The e xploration o f t he R oman F ort a t Ambleside - R eport o n t he S econd y ears w ork 1 914' C W2 1 5 1 915 p p 1 -62 ' The R oman e vacuation o f B ritain' J RS 1 2 1 922 p p 7 4-98
C OLLINGWOOD R G
' Castlesteads' C W2 2 2
( 1922)B C OLLINGWOOD R G
R oman B ritain L ondon 1 924
( 1915)
( 1924) C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1928)A C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1928)B C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1930)A C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1930)B C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1931)A C OLLINGWOOD R G ( 1931)B C OLLINGWOOD R G ä nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1930)B C OLLINGWOOD R G a nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1969) C OLLINGWOOD R G a nd W RIGHT R P ( 1965) C OPLEY G J ( 1958)
1 922 p p
1 98-233
' Excavations a t B rough-by-Bainbridge i n P LPLS 1 ,4 1 928 p p 2 61-84 ' Hardknot C astle' C W2 2 8 1 928 p p 3 14-66
1 926'
T he B ook o f t he P ilgrimage o f H adrian's Wall J uly l st-4th 1 930 K endal 1 930 T he A rchaeology o f R oman B ritain L ondon
1 930
' A R oman F ortlet o n B arrack F ell n ear L ow H esket' C W2 3 1 1 931 p p 1 11-18 ' The R oman S ignal S tation' i n R owntree 1 931 p p 4 0-50 ' Discoveries a t B irdoswald,
o n
H adrian's W all' A ntiquity 4 1 930 p p
1 02-4
T he A rchaeology o f R oman B ritain 2 nd E d L ondon 1 969 T he R oman I nscriptions o f B ritain I I nscriptions o n S tone O xford 1 965 T he A rchaeology o f S outh-East E ngland L ondon
C ORDER P ( 1930)
1 958 ' The D efences o f t he R oman F ort a t M alton'
C ORDER P ( 1932)
R oman M alton a nd D istrict R eport n o 2 1 930 ' Roman M alton a nd D istrict' i n S cientific S urvey o f Y ork a nd D istrict B rit A ss f or t he A dvancement o f S cience 1 932 p p 5 6-61
C ORDER P ( 1933)
C ORDER P ( 1956)
' Roman B ath D iscovered i n 1 930-1 d uring t he R econstruction o f t he Mail C oach I nn , S t S ampson's S quare' P Y orkshire A rch S oc v ol 1 n o 1 1 933 ' The R eorganisation o f t he D efences o f R omanoB ritish T own i n t he F ourth C entury' A rch J 1 12
1 956 p p
2 0-42
C ORDER P ( 1961) C ORDER P a nd B IRLEY M ( 1937)
T he R oman T own a nd V illa a t G reat C asterton R utland ' A p air P ottery 1 937 p p
3 rd R eport N ottingham 1 961 e d P C order o f F ourth C entury R omano-British K ilns n ear C rambeck' A ntiq J 1 7 3 92-413
C OTTON M A a nd G ATHERCOLE P W ( 1958)
E xcavations a t C lausentum, S outhampton 1 951-54 L ondon 1 958
C OTTRILL F ( 1937) C OWAN J D a nd
' Pevensey' J RS 2 7 1 937 p p 2 45 ' The R udge C up' A A4 1 2
R ICHMOND I A ( 1935)
1 935 p p 3 10-42
C REW P ( 1981)
H olyhead M ountain R oman W atch T ower: R eport o n t he 1 980 E xcavations
C ROW J G ( 1981)
L ate R oman F ortifications i n t he L ower D anube P rovinces u npublished M L itt t hesis N ewcastle u pon T yne
C RUMP G A ( 1973)
' Ammianus a nd t he L ate R oman A rmy' H istoria 2 3 1 973 p p 9 1-103 ' Fifth R eport o n t he E xcavations a t R ichborough K ent' S oc o f A ntiq o f L ondon R esearch R eport n o X XIII 1 968 n o X XIII 1 968 T he R egni L ondon 1 973
C UNLIFFE B W ( 1968)
C UNLIFFE B W ( 1973) C UNLIFFE B W ( 1975)
C UNLIFFE B W ( 1977) C UNLIFFE B W ( 1980)
I nterim
' Excavations a t P ortchester C astle, v ol 1 : R oman S oc o f A ntiq o f L ondon R esearch R eport X XXII 1 975 ' Lympne' B ritannia 8 1 977 p 4 25 ' Excavations a t t he R oman F ort a t L ympne 1 976-78' B ritannia 1 1 1 980 p p 2 27-88
C URLE J ( 1911)
A R oman F rontier P ost a nd i ts p eople
D ANIELS C M ( 1959)
G lasgow 1 911 ' The R oman B ath-House a t R ed H ouse C orbridge'
D ANIELS C M ( 1976)
AA4 3 7 1 959 p p 8 5-176 ' Wallsend R oman F ort, 1 975 E xcavations' A rch N ews 1 3 1 976 C BA g roup 3 p p 1 0-11
D ANIELS C M ( 1977)
' Wallsend' B ritannia 8 1 977 p 4 19
D ANIELS C M ( 1978)A
H andbook t o t he R oman W all 1 3th e dition N ewcastle 1 978 e d C M D aniels ' Housesteads' B ritannia 9 1 978 p 4 20 ' Excavations a t W allsend a nd F ourth C entury B arracks o n H adrian's W all' i n H anson a nd
D ANIELS C M ( 1978)B D ANIELS C M ( 1980)A
D ANIELS C M ( 1980)B
K eppie 1 980 p p 1 73-94 ' Housesteads N orth R ampart
D ANIELS C M a nd H ARBOTTLE B ( 1980)
R eports f or 1 979 U niv o f D urham 1 980 ' A N ew I nscription o f J ulia D omna f rom N ewcastle' A AS 8 1 980 p p 6 8-75
D ANIELS C M , J ONES G D B a nd P UTNAM W G ( 1967) D AVEY P J ( 1973)
1 978-9'
A rch
' Excavations a t C aersws, 1 967 I nterim S urvey' M ont C oll 6 0 1a nd 2 1 967-8 p p 6 4-6 C hester N orthgate B rewery: P hase 1, I nterim R eport G rosvenor M useum 1 973
D ESSAU H ( 1892-1914)
I nscriptiones L atinae S electae v ol 1 1 892 v ol I I 1 902 v ol I II 1 914, B erolini
D OBSON B ( 1968-70)
' Roman D urham' T AASDN 2 1 -2
D OBSON B a nd J ARRETT M G ( 1958)
' Excavations a t B inchester i n 1 955' T AASDN 1 1 p art 1 a nd 2 1 958 p p 1 15-23
1 968-70 p p 3 1-43
D OBSON B a nd MANN J C ( 1973)
' The R oman A rmy i n B ritain a nd B ritons t he R oman A rmy' B ritannia 4 1 973 p p
i n
1 91-97
D OBSON B ( 1979)
T he T enth P ilgrimage o f H adrian's W all 2 5-31 A ugust 1 979 K endal 1 979 c ompiled b y B . D obson
D ODDS M H ( 1940)
A H istory o f N orthumberland v ol X V N ewcastle 1 940
D OLBY M J ( 1972)
' Doncaster' B ritannia 3 1 972 p 3 11
D OLBY M J a nd
' Doncaster' B ritannia 2 1 971 p 2 53
B UCKLAND P C ( 1971) D ORE J N a nd G ILLAM J P ( 1979)
T he R oman F ort a t S outh S hields Monograph s er
1S oc o f A ntiq o f N ewcastle
D ROOP J P ( 1928)
' Excavations a t B rough-by-Bainbridge
DROOP J P a nd
I nterim R eport)' P LPLS 2 2 1 928 p p ' Trial E xcavations a t L ancaster'
N EWSTEAD R ( 1928) D ROOP J P a nd J ONES C W ( 1929) DROOP J P a nd J ONES C W ( 1932)
AAA 1 5
N EWSTEAD R ( 1931)A D ROOP J P a nd N EWSTEAD R ( 1931)B DROOP J P a nd N EWSTEAD R ( 1936) D ROOP J P a nd N EWSTEAD R ( 1939)
3 3-40
1 6-38
' Excavations i n t he D eanery F ield, C hester 1 928, p art l ' AAA 1 8 1 1 931 p p ' Excavations C hester 1 931 p p
1 928, p art 2 t he F inds' AAA 1 8 3 1 13-32
' Excavations
i n t he D eanery F ield a nd
A bbey G reen,
1 935' A AA 2 3
' Excavations a t C hester,
1 936 p p 1 939;
S treet C learance A rea' C AS p p 5 -45
3 4
D UNCAN-JONES R P
' Pay a nd N umbers
3 -50
t he P rincess 1 1 939
6 2
1 977 p p
i n D iocletian's A rmy' C hiron 8
T he T rinovantes O ld W oking
1 975
' Chester' J RS 5 8
E ARWAKER J P ( 1888)
R oman R emains R ecently F ound a t C hester Manchester
G REEN C J S ( 1977) E LLISON J A ( 1962) E LLISON J A ( 1966)
1 73-92
1 978 p p 5 41-60
E AMES J V H ( 1968)
E DWARDS D A a nd
6 -18
i n t he D eanery F ield,
' Sub-Roman B ritain' H istory
D UNNETT R ( 1975)
2 p art 4
' Excavations a t B rough-by-Bainbridge ( Third I nterim R eport)' 1 931 P LPLS 3 1 932
DUMVILLE D M ( 1977) ( 1978)
7 7-85
a t B rough-by-Bainbridge
( Second I nterim R eport)' P LPLS 1 929 p p 2 34-45
p p DROOP J P a nd
1 928 p p
' Excavations
1 979
( First
1 968 p 1 83
1 888
' The S axon S hore F ort a nd S ettlement a t B rancaster,
N orfolk'
i n D E J ohnston 1 977
p p 2 1-29 ' Excavations a t C aister-on-Sea N orfolk A rch
3 3
1 1 962 p p
' Excavations
a t C aister-on-Sea,
N orfolk A rch
3 4
1 966 p p
1 961-62'
9 4-108 1 962-63'
4 5-73
F ARRAR R A H ( 1980)
' Roman S ignal S tations O ver t he S tainmore a nd B eyond' i n H anson a nd K eppie 1 980 p p 2 11-31
F ENTRESS E W B ( 1979)
N umidia a nd t he R oman A rmy B AR S 53
F ERRIS I M a nd J ONES R F J ( 1979)
' Binchester
IM ( 1980)
1 979 ' Binchester
F LORESCU R ( 1967)
' Les p hases
F ERRIS
1 978' C BA group s
B ritannia
1 1
1 979
3A rch N ews
7
1 980 p 3 61
d e c onstruction d u c astrum D robeta
( rurnu S everin)
.
i n S tudien z u d en
m ilitär g renzen i t s 2 ja s• ( Beihefte d er B onner J arbücher, B ond 1 9) K öln 1 967 p p 1 44-51
F OX G ( 1902) F OX A a nd R AVENHILL W ( 1959)
F RERE S S ( 1961)
' Report o n t he P resent S tate o f C lausentum' P SAL X IX 1 902 p p 5 6-7 ' The S toke H ill R oman S ignal S tation; E xcavations 1 956-7' T rans D evon A ss f or t he a dvancement o f S cience L iterature a nd A rt 9 1 1 959 R eview o f ' The C ity o f Y ork: V ol 1 E buracum R oman Y ork' A rch J 1 18 1 961 2 56-7
F RERE S S ( 1967)
B ritannia: a H istory o f R oman B ritain L ondon 1 967
F RERE S S ( 1978)
B ritannia: a H istory o f R oman B ritain 3 rd e dition L ondon 1 978
F RERE S S a nd H ARTLEY B R ( 1968)
' Bowes,
G ALLIOU P ( 1980)
' The d efence o f A rmorica i n t he l ater R oman E mpire: a t entative s ynthesis' i n H anson a nd K eppie 1 980 p p 3 97-422 ' Roman B rough ( Anavio)' D AJ 2 6 1 904 p p 1 77-96
G ARSTANG J ( 1904) G IBSON J P ( 1903)A
Y orkshire 1 967' i nfo s heet J an 1 968
' Excavations o n t he L ine o f t he R oman W all:p art 2 M ucklebank W all T urret' AA2 2 4 1 903 p p 1 3-18
G IBSON J P ( 1903)B
' Excavations o n t he L ine o f t he R oman W all:p art 3 G reat C hesters ( Aesica)' A A2 2 4 1 903 p p 1 9-64
G IBSON J P a nd
' The M ilecastle o n t he W all o f H adrian a t P oltross B urn' C W2 1 1 1 911 p p 3 90-461
S IMPSON F G ( 1911) G ILLAM J P ( 1949)
' Also a long t he L ine o f t he W all' C W2 4 9
G ILLAM J P ( 1950)
1 949 p p 3 8-58 ' Recent e xcavations a t B irdoswald' C W2 5 0 1 950 p p 1 63-69
G ILLAM J P ( 1954) G ILLAM G ILLAM G ILLAM G ILLAM
J J J J
P P P P
( 1957) ( 1961) ( 1962) ( 1974)A
' The R oman B ath-house a t B ewcastle' C W2 5 4 p p 2 65-67 ' Bewcastle' J RD 4 7 1 957 p p 2 04-5 ' Haltonchesters' J RS 5 1 1 961 p p 1 64 ' Haltonchesters' J RS 5 2 1 962 p 1 64 ' Uxellodunum a nd t he O rder o f B attle' R oman N orthern F rontier S eminar 1 0 1 974 p p
1 -6
G ILLAM J P ( 1974)B
' The F rontier a fter H adrian - A H istory o f t he P roblem' A AS 2 1 974 p p 1 -15
G ILLAM J P ( 1976)
' Coarse F umed W are i n N orth B ritain a nd B eyond' G AJ 4 1 976 p p 5 7-80
G ILLAM J P ( 1979)A G ILLAM J P ( 1979)B
' Corbridge' i n B . D obson 1 979 p 1 7 ' Romano-Saxon P ottery: a n A lternative
G ILLAM J P a nd D ANIELS C M G ILLAM J P , HARRISON R M a nd N EWMAN T G
I nterpretation' i n C asey 1 979A p p 1 03-18 ' Housesteads B arrack B lock X III' A rch N ews 1 976 p 9 ' Interim R eport o n E xcavations a t t he R oman F ort o f R udchester, A AS 1 1 973 p p 8 1-6
1 972'
G ILLAM J P a nd
' The R oman F ort a t C hester-le-Street' A A4
T AIT J ( 1968) G OODBURN R a nd B ARTHOLOMEW P ( 1976)
4 6 1 968 p p 7 5-96 A spects o f t he N otitia D ignitatum B AR S 15 1 976 e d R G oodburn a nd P B artholomew
1 4
G OULD J ( 1964)
' Excavations a t W all o n t he S ite o f
( Staffordshire),
1 961-3
t he E arly R oman F orts a nd o f
G REEN C ( 1961)
L ate R oman D efences' T rans L ichfield a nd S S taffs A rch a nd H ist S oc 5 1 964 p p 1 -50 ' Burgh C astle' J RS 5 1 1 9E7 p 1 83
G REEN C J ( 1973)
' Littlechester' B ritannia 4 1 973 p 2 85
G REENE K T ( 1978)
' Apperley D ene " Roman F ortlet": a R ee xamination, 1 974-5' A AS 6 1 978 p 2 9-60
G RIFFITHS W E
' Excavations a t C aer G ybi,
( 1954)
A C
H ANSON W S a nd K EPPIE
L J
1 03
1 954 p p
1 952'
1 13-16
R oman F rontier S tudies F
H olyhead,
t he
1 979 B AR-S71
1 980
e d W S H anson a nd L J F K eppie
( 1980) H ARBOTTLE B a nd E LLISON M ( 1979) H ARDEN D B ( 1956)
E xcavations a t t he C astle, N ewcastle u pon T yne 1 978' A rch N ews 2 7 1 979 p p 1 0-12 D ark A ge B ritain - S tudies P resented t o E T L eeds L ondon e d D B H arden
HARPER R P ( 1961)
' An E xcavation a t C hesters,
1 960' A A4 3 9
1 961 p p 3 21-6 H ARPER R P ( 1964) H ARROD H ( 1859)
' Excavations a t P iercebridge, 1 964 p p 2 7-44
1 964' T AASDN2
1
' Notice o f E xcavations Made a t B urgh C astle S uffolk i n t he y ears A rch 5 1 859 p p
1 850 a nd
1 855' N orfolk
1 46-60
HARTLEY B R ( 1960)
' The R oman F ort a t B ainbridge' P LPLS 9 .3 1 960 p p 1 07-31
HARTLEY B R ( 1961)
' Bainbridge' J RS
H ARTLEY B R ( 1966)
' The R oman F ort a t I lkley, 1 962' P LPLS
1 2
5 1
1 961 p 1 67 E xcavations o f
1 966
H ARTLEY B R ( 1969)
' Bainbridge' J RS 5 9
HARTLEY B R ( 1970)
' Bainbridge' B ritannia
1 969 p p 2 06-9
HARTLEY B R ( 1972)
' The R oman O ccupation o f
1 1 970
2 79
S cotland:
T he E vidence
o f S amian W are' B ritannia 3 1 972 p p
1 -55
HASSALL M W C ( 1976)
' Britain i n t he N otitia'
HASTIE D C ( 1979)
A spects o f S iege-Warfare o n t he Mesopotamian
B artholomew 1 976 p p
i n G oodburn a nd
1 03-18
F rontier a s r elated b y Ammianus Marcellinus u npublished B A D issertation N ewcastle 1 979 HAVERFIELD F ( 1899)
' Report o f t he C umberland E xcavation C ommittee f or
HAVERrIELD F ( 1912)
J RS H AVERFIELD F C OLLINGWOOD R G
1 899' C W1
1 6
1 899 p p
8 0-92
' Notes o n R oman C oast D efences
o f B ritain'
2 1 912 p p 2 01-14
' Report o n t he E xploration o f a t A mbleside
1 913' C W2
1 4
t he R oman F ort
1 914 p p
4 33-65
a nd F REESTON L B ( 1914) H AWKES
S C ( 1961)
' Soliders a nd S ettlers
i n B ritain F ourth
F ifth C entury' M ed A rch 5 1 961 p p HAWKES S C ( 1974)
' Some R ecent F inds
t o
1 -41
o f L ate R oman B uckles'
B ritannia 5 1 974 p p 3 86-93 HAWKES S C a nd D UNNING G C ( 1961)
' Catalogue o f A nimal-Ornamented B uckles and R elated B elt-Fittings' Med A rch
5 1 961
p p 4 1-71 H EDLEY W P ( 1937)
' The L ast D ays o f C orstopitum a nd W all - t he C oin E vidence' AA4 p p 9 5-102
1 4
t he R oman 1 937
H IGHAM N ( 1979) H ILDYARD E J W ( 1954)
T he C hanging P ast U niv o f Manchester e d N . H igham ' Excavations a t B urrow-in-Lonsdale C W2 5 4
H ILDYARD E J W a nd G ILLAM J P ( 1951) H ILDYARD E J W a nd G ILLAM J P ( 1957) H ILDYARD E J W a nd W ADE W V ( 1948-51) H IND J G F ( 1975)
1 954 p p
1 979
1 952-53'
6 6-101
' Renewed e xcavation a t L ow B urrow B ridge' C W2 5 1 1 951 p p 1 -19 ' Cataractonium F ort a nd T own' Y AJ 3 9 p p 2 24-65
1 957
' Catterick B ridge - a R oman T own' Y AJ 3 7 1 948-51 p p 4 02-19 ' The B ritish P rovinces H istoria 2 4
1 975 p p
o f O rcades a nd V alentia
1 01-11
H IND J G F ( 1980)
' Litus S axonicum - t he M eanwing o f t he S axon S hore' i n H anson a nd K eppie 1 980 p p 3 17-24
H IRD L ( 1973)
T he P re-Hadrianic P ottery, H altwistle 1 973
H OBLEY B ( 1974)
' The L unt' C A44
H OGG A H A ( 1953)
' Hen W aliau' J RS
1 974 p p 4 3
V indolanda V
2 71-80
1 953 p 1 04
H OLDSWORTH P ( 1981)
' Manchester' B ritannia
H OME G ( 1929)
' Proceedings a t Meetings,
V isit o f P arty t o
R eculver' A rch J 8 6
2 60
H OOPER B ( 1975) H OOPPELL R E ( 1878)
1 2
1 929
1 981 p 3 31
' The H uman B ones' i n C unliffe 1 975 p p 3 75-77 ' Discovery a nd E xploration o f R oman R emains a t S outh S hields'
1 875-6 T rans o f t he
N atural H istory S oc o f N orthumberland, D urham a nd N ewcastle 8 1 878 H OOPPELL R E ( 1891)
H istory o f V inovia: L ondon
H ORNSBY W a nd
A B uried R oman C ity
1 891
' A R oman S ignal S tation a t G oldsborough'
L AVERICK J D ( 1932) H ORNSBY W a nd
A rch J 8 9
1 932 p p
2 03-19
' The R oman F ort a t H untcliff n ear S altburn'
S TANTON R ( 1912)
J RS 2 1 912 p p 2 15-32
H ORSLEY J ( 1732)
B ritannia R omana L ondon
H ULL M R ( 1932)
' The P ottery F rom t he R oman S ignal S tations o n
1 732
t he Y orkshire C oast' A rch J 8 9 H ULL M R ( 1963)
' Roman G azetteer'
1 932 p p 2 20-53
i n A H istory o f t he C ounty
o f E ssex: V ol I II R oman E ssex O xford p p 3 5-204 H UNTER-BLAIR
( 1934)
H URST M R ( 1969)
' Housesteads M ilecastle' AA4 ' Horncastle' J RS
5 9
I NMAN R ( 1979)
' Roman C leveland'
J ARRETT M G ( 1959)
' The D efences o f
1 960 p p
i n S pratt
1 979,
1 959 p p
1 7-30
1 77-90 C ounty D urham'
1 93-229
' Roman C oins a nd P otters' H altonchesters' AA4 3 8
S tamps f rom
1 960 p p
1 53-60
1968)A J ARRETT M G (
' The R oman F ort a t B recon G aer: B BCS 2 2 4 1 968 p p 4 26-32
1968)B J ARRETT M G (
' Legio X X V aleria V ictrix i n B ritain' A C
J ARRETT M G ( 1976)
1 17 1 968 p p 7 7-91 M aryport, C umbria; G arrison K endal
S ome P roblems'
a R oman F ort a nd i ts
1 976
1978) J ARRETT M G (
' The C ase o f
1980) J ARRETT M G (
B ritannia 9 1 978 p p 2 89-92 R eview o f P otter 1 979A B ritannia p p 4 31
1 03-21
t he R oman F ort a t
' The R oman F ort a t E bchester, A A4 3 8
J ARRETT M G ( 1960)B
1 934 p p
1 969 p 2 14
H altonchesters' AA4 3 7 1960)A J ARRETT M G (
1 1
1 963
t he R edundant O fficial' 1 0
1 980
J ARRETT M G a nd
' Crop-mark S ites a t M ucking, A ntiq J 4 8
J ESSUP R ( 1936) J OBEY G ( 1973)
J OBEY I ( 1979) J OHNSON A E ( 1975)
E ssex
1 968 p p 2 10-30
' Reculver' A nt
1 0
1 936 p p
1 79-94
' A N ative S ettlement a t H artburn a nd t he D evil's C auseway N orthumberland, 1 971' A AS 1 1 973 p p 1 1-54 ' Housesteads W are - a F risian T radition o n H adrian's W all' AAS 7 1 979 p p 1 27-44 ' Wapping' B ritannia 6 1 975 p 2 69
J OHNSON J S ( 1970)
' The D ate o f t he C onstruction o f t he S axon S hore F ort a t R ichborough' B ritannia 1 1 970 p p 2 40-8
J OHNSON J S ( 1973)
' Late R oman C ity W alls i n G allia B elgica' B ritannia 4 1 973 p p 2 10-23
J OHNSON J S ( 1975)
' Vici i n L owland B ritain' i n R odwell a nd R owley 1 975 p p 7 5-83
J OHNSON J S ( 1976)A
T he R oman F orts o f t he S axon S hore L ondon 1 976
J OHNSON J S ( 1976)B
L ate R oman F ortifications i n t he W estern E mpire u npublished P hD t hesis O xford 1 976 ' Channel C ommands i n t he N otitia' i n G oodburn
1976)C J OHNSON J S (
a nd B artholomew 1 976 p p 8 1-102 J OHNSON J S ( 1977) J OHNSON J S ( 1980)A J OHNSON J S (1980)B
' Late R oman D efences a nd t he L imes' i n J ohnston 1 977A p p 6 3-69 L ater R oman B ritain L ondon
1 980
' Excavations b y C harles G reen a t B urgh C astle, 1 958-61' i n H anson a nd K eppie 1 980 p p 3 25-32
J OHNSON T ( 1975)
' A R oman S ignal T ower a t S hadwell, E 1 - a n I nterim N ote' L MAS 2 6 1 975 p p 2 78-80
J OHNSTON D E ( 1977)A
T he S axon S hore C BA R esearch R eport
J OHNSTON D E ( 1977)B
e d D E J ohnson ' The G allic E vidence: t he C hannel I slands' i n J ohnson 1 977A p p 3 1-4
J ONES A H M ( 1973)
T he L ater R oman E mpire 2 84-602 v ol 1 a nd 2 ,
1 8
1 977
r eprinted O xford 1 973 J ONES G D B ( 1967) 1970) J ONES G D B ( 1972) J ONES G D B ( J ONES G D B ( 1973)
' Manchester U niversity E xcavations o f 1 967' D AJ 8 7 1 967 ' Roman L ancashire' A rch J 1 27 1 970 p p 2 37-45 ' Lancaster' B ritannia 3 1 . 7 2 p 3 12 R oman M anchester A ltrincham 1 973
1978) J ONES G D B (
' Concept a nd D evelopment i n R oman F rontiers' B ulletin o f t he J ohn R ylands U niv L ibrary o f M anchester 6 1 1 1 978 p p 1 15-44
J ONES G D B ( 1979) J ONES G B D , D ORE J M a nd A LKER L M ( 1974) J ONES G D B , T HOMPSON F H a nd
' Invasion a nd R esponse i n R oman B ritain' i n B urnham a nd J ohnson 1 979 p p 5 7-80 ' Excavations a t M itre Y ard, L ancaster, 1 973' C ontrebis 2 .1
1 974 p p
7 -8
' Manchester U niversity E xcavations a t B rougho n-Noe ( Navio) 1 966' D AJ 8 6 1 966
W ILD J P ( 1966) J ONES G D B a nd W ILD J P ( 1968) J ONES G D B a nd W ILD J P ( 1969)A J ONES G D B a nd W ILD J P ( 1969)B
' Excavations a t B rough-on-Noe ( Navio) 1 968' D AJ 8 8 1 968 p p 8 9-95 ' Manchester U niversity E xcavations a t B rougho n-Noe ( Navio) 1 969' DAJ 8 9 1 969 p p 9 9-106 ' Brough-on-Noe' J RS 5 9 1 969 p 2 11, f ig 3 3
J ONES M J ( 1975) J ONES M U ( 1968) J ONES R F J ( 1977)
R oman F ort D efences t o A D
1 17 B AR 2 1
1 975
' Crop-mark S ites a t M ucking, E ssex' A ntiq 4 8 1 968 p p 2 10-30 ' Excavations a t B inchester R oman F ort, 1 976' A rch N ews
1 5 p p 6 -9
J ONES R F J ( 1978) J ONES R F J ( 1981)
' Binchester' B ritannia 9 1 978 p p 4 25-6 ' Change o n t he F rontier: N orthern B ritain i n t he T hird C entury' i n K ing a nd H enig 1 981 p p 3 93-414
K EENEY G S ( 1939-43)
' Excavations a t t he R oman F ort a t P iercebridge i n 1 938' T AASND 9 1 939-43 p p 4 3-68
K EENEY G S ( 1946-53)
' Excavations a t t he R oman F ort a t P iercebridge i n 1 949' T AASND 1 0 1 946-53 p p 2 58-309
1951) K ENT J P C (
' Coin E vidence a nd t he E vacuation o f H adrian's W all' C W2 5 1 1 951 p p 4 -15
K ENT J P C ( 1979)
' The E nd o f R oman B ritain: t he L iterary a nd N umismatic E vidence R eviewed' i n C asey 1 979A p p 1 5-27
K ENT A R ( 1970)
' Roman C oins f rom R eculver' K ent A rch R eview 1 9
K ENT A R ( 1971)
1 970 ' Roman C oins f rom R eculver' K ent A rch R eview 2 3 1 971
K ING A a nd H ENIG M ( 1981)
T he R oman W est i n t he T hird C entury:
f rom
C ontributions A rchaeology a nd H istory S 109 1 981 e d A K ing a nd H enig K ITSON-CLARKE M ( 1940) ' Flamborough H ead' YAJ 1 940 p 8 2 K NOWLES W H a nd ' The R omano-British S ite o f C orstopitum' A A3 F ORSTER R H ( 1909) L EACH J a nd W ILKES J ( 1962) L EATHER G M ( 1971) L EATHER G M ( 1973)
5 1 909 p p 3 05-424 ' Excavations a t t he R oman F ort a t H ousesteads, 1 961' A A4 4 0 1 962 p p 8 3-96 ' Lancaster' B ritannia 2 1 971 p 2 54 R oman L ancaster; S ome E xcavation R eports a nd S ome O bservations P reston 1 973
L ING R a nd L ING L A ( 1973) L IVENS R G ( 1974) L OFTUS-BROCK E P ( 1888) L UTTWAK E N ( 1976)
' Excavations a t L oughor, G lamorgan: T he N orthE ast a nd S outh-East A ngles o f t he R oman F ort' A C 1 22 1 973 p p 9 9-146 ' Litus H ibernicum' i n P ippidi 1 974 p p 3 33-40 ' The A ge o f t he W alls o f C hester, w ith r eference t o R ecent D iscussions' i n E arwaker
1 888 p p 4 0-66
T he G rand S trategy o f t he R oman E mpire B altimore 1 976
M ACDONALD G a nd PARK A ( 1906)
T he R oman F orts o n t he B ar H ill G lasgow 1 906
M CINTYRE J ( 1929)
' Greta B ridge' J RS
MACLAUCHLAN H ( 1858)
M emoir W ritten D uring a S urvey o f t he R oman
MACMULLEN R ( 1963)
L ondon 1 858 S oldier a nd C ivilian i n t he L ater R oman E mpire
MACMULLEN R ( 1976)
H arvard 1 963 R oman G overnments R esponse t o C risis Y ale U P
M cPEAKE J ( 1978)
1 976 ' The e nd o f
MANN J C ( 1960) M ANN J C ( 1974)A
1 9
1 929 p 1 90
t he A ffair' i n S trickland a nd D avey
1 978 p p 4 1-44 ' Chester-le-Street' J RS 5 0 1 960 p 2 15 ' The N orthern F rontier a fter A D 3 69' G AJ 3 1 974 p p 3 4-42
MANN j C ( 1974)B
' The F rontiers o f
t he P rincipate'
i n A ufstieg
a nd N iedergang d er R omischen W elt B erlin, N ew Y ork 1 974 p p 5 08-33 M ANN J C ( 1976)
' What was
MANN J C ( 1977)
G oodburn R a nd B artholomew P 1 976 p p 1 -10 ' Duces a nd C omites i n t he 4 th C entury' i n
t he N otitia D ignitatum f or?' i n
J ohnston 1 977A p p M ANN J C ( 1979)A
' Hadrian's W all: i n C asey
1 1-14 T he L ast P hases'
1 979A p p
1 44-51
M ANN J C ( 1979)B
' Power,
MARSDEN E W
R eview o f L uttwak 1 976' J RS 6 9 1 979 p p G reek a nd R oman A rtillery: H istorical
( 1969) MARSDEN P ( 1980)
D evelopment O xford 1 969 R oman L ondon L ondon 1 980
MARTIN K M ( 1969)
F orce a nd t he F rontiers
' A R eassessment o f
o f
t he Emnpire; 1 75-83
t he E vidence f or t he C omes
B ritanniarum i n t he F ourth C entury' L atomus 1 969 p p 4 09-28 MATTHEWS-JONES I ( 1888)
' Official R eport o n t he D iscoveries o f Roman R emains a t C hester d uring t he F irst R epairs t he N orth W all i n p p 1 -10
MAXFIELD V A a nd R EED A ( 1975)
1 887' i n E arwaker
' Excavations a t E bchester R oman F ort
t o
1 888 1 972-3'
AA5 3 1 975 p p 4 3-104
MAY T ( 1911)
' The R oman F orts a t E lslack' YAJ 2 1
MAY T ( 1922)
T he R oman F orts a t T empleborough R otherham 1 922
M ERRIFIELD R ( 1966)
' Cripplegate' J RS 5 6
M ERTENS J ( 1977)
' Oudenburg a nd t he N orthern S ection o f
1 911
1 966 p 2 10 t he
C ontinental L itus S axonicum' i n J ohnston 1 977A p p 5 1-62 M ILLER S N ( 1927)
' York' J RS
M ILLER S N ( 1928)
' Roman Y ork,
M ILNES H ( 1972)
1 928 p p 6 1-99 ' Stoke H ill' B ritannia 3 1 972 p 2 45
M ITCHELSON N ( 1964)
1 927 p p
1 89-90
E xcavations o f
' Roman M alton, Y AJ 4 1
M ORRIS A J ( 1948)
1 7
t he C ivilian S ettlement,
1 8
1 949-52'
1 964 p p 2 09-61
' The S axon S hore F ort a t B urgh C astle' P roc S uffolk I nst o f A rch 2 4
M ORRIS J R ( 1973)
1 926-27' J RS
1 948 p p
1 00-20
T he A ge o f A urthur; a H istory o f
t he B ritish
I sles f rom 3 50-650 L ondon 1 973 M ORRIS J R ( 1974)
' Review o f M yres a nd G reen
1 973' Med A rch
1 8
1 974 p p 2 25-31 M OTHERSOLE J ( 1924) MURRAY-THREIPLAND L ( 1965) MURRAY-THREIPLAND L
T he S axon S hore L ondon 1 924 ' Caerleon: M useum S treet S ite, 1 965 p p 1 30-45 ' Excavations a t C aerleon,
1 966;
B arracks
N orth C orner' A C
MYRES J N L ( 1969)
A nglo-Saxon P ottery a nd t he S ettlement o f
MYRES J N L a nd
T he A nglo-Saxon C emeteries o f C aistor-by-
' Romano-Saxon P ottery' E ngland O xford
G REEN B ( 1973) ( 1931) NASH-WILLIAMS V E ( 1936)
1 967 p p
1 14
( 1967) MYRES J N L ( 1956)
NASH-WILLIAMS V E
1 16
1 965' A C
i n t he
2 3-56
i n H arden
1 956 p p
1 6-39
1 969
N orwich a nd M arkshall L ondon
1 973
' The R oman L egionary F ortress a t C aerleon, E xcavations
i n t he P rysg F ield
1 927-9'
A C 8 6 1 931 p p 9 9-157 ' Miscellanea, C aerleon E xcavations, A C
9 1
1 936 p p 3 18-21
1 936'
N ASH-WILLIAMS V E ( 1954) N ASH-WILLIAMS V E ( 1969) N EAL D S ( 1978)
T he R oman F rontier i n W ales C ardiff
1 954
T he R oman F rontier i n W ales C ardiff 1 969 s econd r evised e dition e d M G J arrett ' The G rowth a nd D ecline o f V illas i n t he V erulamium A rea' i n T odd
1 978A p p 3 3-58
N EWBOLD P ( 1931)
' Excavations o n t he R oman W all a t L imestone B ank' A A3 2. 1 913 p p 5 4-74
N ORTH 0 H a nd H ILDYARD E J W
' Excavations a t t he R oman F ort o f W atercrook, 1 944' C W2 .L1 . 1 945 p p i 48-62
( 1945) O 'NEIL H ( 1971)
' The R oman V illa a t P ark S treet n ear S t A lbans, H erts' H erts A rch S oc 1 971
P AINTER K S ( 1965)
' , A i R oman S ilver T reasure f rom C anterbury' J BAA 2 08 1 965 p p 1 -15
P AINTER K S ( 1972)
L ate R oman S ilver I ngot f rom K ent' A nt J 5 2 1 972 p p 8 4-92
P EACOCK D P S ( 1973)
' Forged B rick-Stamps f rom P evensey' A ntiquity 4 7 1 973 p p 1 38-40 ' Bricks a nd T iles o f t he C lassis B ritannica: P etrology a nd O rgin' B ritannia 8 1 977 p p 2 35-48 R oman Y orkshire L ondon 1 936 P evensey C astle, S ussex H MSO L ondon
P EACOCK D P S ( 1977) P EARSON F R ( 1936) P EERS C ( 1952) P ETCH J A ( 1956)
' The F oundations o f t he N orth G ateway o f R oman M anchester' L CAS _ § _ § . 1 956 p p 2 9-37
P ETCH J A ( 1959)
' The R oman O ccupation o f L ancashire a nd C heshire' C AS 6 9 1 959 p p 1 -14
P ETCH D F ( 1968)
' The P raetorium a t D eva' C AS 5 5
P ETCH D F ( 1971)
' Excavations o n t he S ite o f t he O ld M arket H all, 1 968-71 C AS 1. 7 . _1 971 p p 3 -26
P ETCH D F a nd T HOMPSON F ( 1959) P ETRIKOVITS H V ON ( 1971)
1 968 p p
' Excavations i n C ommonhall S treet,
1 -6
C hester
1 954-6: T he G ranaries o f t he L egionary F ortress o f C hester' C AS _ 4 _ 6 _ 1 959 p p 3 3-60 ' Fortifications i n t he N orth-Western R oman E mpire f rom t he T hird t o t he F ifth C entury' J RS 6 1 1 971 p p 1 78-218
P HILLIPS D ( 1970)
' York' B ritannia 1 1 970 p 2 81
P HILP B J ( 1957)
' Recent D iscoveries a t R eculver' A rch C ant 1 957 p p 1 67-84
P HILP B J ( 1959)
' Reculver: E xcavations o n t he R oman F ort i n 1 957' A rch C ant 7 3 1 959 p p 9 6-115 ' Excavations a t R eculver, 1 958' A rch C ant 7 4 1 960 p p 1 82-6 ' Reculver' J RS 5 1 1 961 p 1 91 ' Reculver' J RS 5 2 1 962 p 1 90 ' Reculver' J RS 5 3 1 963 p 1 58 ' Reculver' J RS 5 7 1 967 p 2 02
P HILP B J ( 1960) P HILP B J ( 1961) P HILP B J ( 1962) P HILP B J ( 1963) P HILP B J ( 1967) P HILP B J ( 1969)A 1969)B P HILP B J (
' The R oman F ort a t R eculver' A rch J 1 26 p p 2 23-4 ' Reculver' J RS
1 .. 9 _1 969
7 1
1 969
p 2 33
P HILP B J ( 1969)C 1973) P HILP B J ( 1977) P HILP B J (
T he R oman F ort a t R eculver W est W ickham 1 969 ' Dover' C A .1 8 _ M ay 1 973 p p 8 1-88
P HILP B J ( 1981)
T he E xcavation o f t he R oman F orts o f t he C lassis B ritannica a t D over 1 970-77 K ent M onograph S eries N o 3 1 981
' The B ritish E vidence: D over' i n J ohnston 1 977A p p 2 0-21
P IPPIDI D M ( 1974)
A ctes d u I X C ongres I nternational D 'Etudes S ur L es F rontiers R oimaines B ucureeti, 1 974 e d D M P ippidi
l ean, W ein,
P OTTER T W ( 1974)A
' Excavations a t B owness-on-Solway, C umberland' C ontrebis 2 1 1 974 p p 3 8-40
P OTTER T W ( 1974)B P OTTER T W ( 1975)
' Bowness-on-Solway' B ritannia 5 1 974 p 4 18 ' Excavations a t B owness-on-Solway, 1 973' C W2 7 5 1 975 p p 2 9-57 -
P OTTER T W ( 1977)
' The B iglands M ilefortlet a nd t he C umberland C oast D efences' B ritannia 8 1 977 p p 1 49-83 T he R omans i n N orth-West E ngland C W R esearch S eries V ol 1 1 979
P OTTER T W ( 1979)A P OTTER T W ( 1979)B P RYCE F N a nd P RYCE T D ( 1929) P RYCE F N a nd P RYCE T D ( 1930) P RYCE F N ( 1932) R ADLEY
J ( 1972)
' The C umbrian C oast D efences a nd R avenglass' i n D obson 1 979 p p 2 4-7 ' The F orden G aer, S econd I nterim R eport ( Excavations o f 1 928)' A C 8 4 1 929 p p 1 00-39 ' The F orden G aer, T hird I nterim R eport ( Excavations o f 1 929)' A C 8 5 1 930 p p 1 15-30 ' Newtown - R eport' A C 8 7 1 932 p p 4 38-9 ' Excavations i n t he D efences o f t he C ity o f Y ork: a n E arly Medieval S tone T ower a nd t he S uccessive E arth R amparts' YAJ 44 1 972 p p 3 8-64
RAINE A ( 1932)
S ' R 1 . 1oma 3 n 7
E xcavations
gi t sY to rr it
A dvancement o f S cience R AMM H G ( 1957) R AMM H G ( 1968) R AMM H G ( 1971) R EECE R ( 1977)
R EED A H ARPER R a nd D ODDS W ( 1964) R ICHARDSON K EENEY G R ICHMOND I R ICHMOND I
G H a nd S ( 1934-6) A A ( 1923)
R ICHMOND I A ( 1930) R ICHMOND
I A ( 1931)
R ICHMOND I A ( 1932)
A2 S e rf l to
ncl e
1 932 p p 5 2-56
' Newton K yme' J RS 4 7 1 957 p 2 09 ' York' J RS 5 8 1 968 p 1 82 ' The E nd o f R oman Y ork' i n B utler 1 971A p p 1 79-99 ' Coins a nd F rontier - S upply a nd D emand' i n L imes X I I nternational C ongress A kademia K iado, B udapest 1 977 p p 6 43-6 ' Excavations a t E bchester i n 1 962-3' AA4 4 2 1 964 p p 1 73-83 ' Excavations a t t he R oman F ort o f P iercebridge 1 933-34' T AASND 7 1 934-6 p p 2 35-66 T he R oman F ort a t S outh S hield: A G uide Y ' AJ Fo 2u 7r t 1h 92 C 3e n p p tur 2 1 y1D 1 is 8turbance i n t he
: :o
i nes'
T h R om e e C it O y xfo W r ad ll o f I mperial ' Excavations o n H adrian's W all i n t he B irdoswald - P ike H ill S ector' C W2 3 1 1 931 p p 1 22-34 ' The F our R oman C amps a t C awthorn i n t he N orth R iding o f Y orkshire' A rch J 8 9 1 932 p p 1 7-78
R ICHMOND I A ( 1934)
' The R oman F ort a t S outh S hields' A A4
R ICHMOND I A ( 1936)
1 934 p p 8 3-102 ' Excavations a t H igh R ochester a nd R isingham 1 935' A A4 1 3 1 936 p p 1 84-98
R ICHMOND I A ( 1940)
' The R omans i n R edesdale' i n D odds p p 6 3-154
1 1
1 940
R ICHMOND I A ( 1946)
' Roman A rtillery' D UJ 7 .2
R ICHMOND I A ( 1947)
H andbook t o t he R oman W all
1 946 p p 6 0-63
R ICHMOND I A ( 1953)
N ewcastle 1 947 e d IA R ichmond ' Excavations o n t he S ite o f t he R oman F ort a t L ancaster 1 950' H SLC 1 05 1 953 p p 1 -24
1 0th e dition
R ICHMOND I A ( 1954)
' The B irdoswald H oard a nd i ts C omposition' C W2 5 4 1 954
R ICHMOND I A ( 1955)
T he P elican H istory o f E ngland, P enguin 1 955
R ICHMOND I A ( 1956)
' Cote H ow T ower ( 16a) C W2 5 6 1 956 p p 6 2-66
R ICHMOND I A ( 1957) R ICHMOND I A ( 1958)A R ICHMOND I A ( 1958)B
o n t he C umberland C oast'
H andbook t o t he R oman Wall N ewcastle
R oman B ritain
1 1th e dition
1 957 e d IA R ichmond
R oman a nd N ative i n N orth B ritain N elson e d IA R ichmond
1 958
' Roman a nd N ative i n t he F ourth C entury A D a nd a fter'
i n R ichmond
1 958A p p
1 12-30
R ICHMOND
A ( 1959)
' Lancaster' J RS
R ICHMOND
A ( 1960) A ( 1961)
' Roman B ritain 1 910-60' J RS 5 0 1 960 p p 1 73-91 ' A N ew B uilding I nscription f rom t he S axon S hore
R ICHMOND
4 9
F ort a t R eculver, R ICHMOND I A ( 1962)
R eview o f
1 959 p p
1 06-8 f ig
K ent' A nt
J 4 1
7
1 961 p p
' Cotton a nd G ather7ole
2 24-28
1 958' J RS
5 2
1 962 R ICHMOND I A ( 1963)
' Palmyra u nder t he A egis o f R ome' J RS
5 3
1 963
p p 4 3-54 R ICHMOND I A a nd B IRLEY E B ( 1930) R ICHMOND I A a nd B IRLEY E B ( 1938) nd R ICHMOND I A a B IRLEY E B ( 1940) nd R ICHMOND I A a CRAWFORD O G S ( 1949) R ICHMOND I A a nd 1951) G ILLAM J P ( nd R ICHMOND I A a G ILLAM J
' Excavations o n H adrian's W all, B irdoswald-Pike h ill S ector, p p 1 69-205 ' Excavations a t C orbridge, 1 938 p p
i n t he
1 929' C W2 3 0
1 936-38' AA4
1 5
1 938-39' AA4
1 7
1 930
2 43-94
' Excavations a t C orbridge, 1 940 p p 8 5-115 ' The B ritish S ection o f C osmography'
t he R avenna
A rchaeololgia 9 3
1 949 p p
1 -50
' The T emple o f M ithras a t C arrawburgh' AA4 2 9 1 951 p p 1 -92 ' Report o f f or
t he C umberland E xcavations C ommittee
1 947-9 3 M ilecastle
7 9
( Solway)
C W2 5 2
1 952 R ICHMOND I A
' The R oman F ort a t B ewcastle' C W2 p p 1 95-239
3 8
R IVET A L F ( 1969)
T he R oman V illa i n B ritain L ondon
1 969
R IVET A L F ( 1975)
e d A L F R ivet ' The C lassification o f M inor T owns a nd R elated
HOGSON K S a nd S T J OSEPH K ( 1938)
S ettlements' i n R odwell a nd R owley p p 1 11-114 R IVET A L F a nd
1 938
1 975
T he P lace N ames o f R oman B ritain L ondon
S MITH C ( 1979) R OBERTS P ( 1974) R OBERTSON A ( 1970)
' Burghwallis' B ritannia 5 1 974 4 16 ' Roman F inds f rom n on-Roman S ites i n S cotland: M ore R oman
R OBINSON D J ( 1970)
' Drift' i n C aledonia' B ritannia
1
1 970 p p 1 98-226 T he A rchaeology o f t he S axon S hore i n B ritain a nd i ts R elation t o L ate C ontinental F ortifications u npublished M P hil d issertation N ewcastle u pon T yne
R ODWELL W ( 1975)
a nd R owley R ODWELL W a nd R OWLEY T ( 1975)
1 970
' Trinovantian T owns a nd T heir S etting'
i n R odwell
1 975 p p 8 5-102
S mall T owns o f R oman B ritain e d W R odwell a nd T R owley
B AR
1 5
1 975
R OWNTREE A ( 1931)
H istory o f S carborough L ondon e d A R owntree
R OXAN M M ( 1976)
' Pre-Severan A uxilia N amed i n t he N otitia D ignitatum' i n G oodburn a nd B artholomew 1 976 p p 5 9-80
R CHM Y ork I
R oyal C ommission o n H istorical M onuments ( England), Y ork I ( Eburacum , H MSO L ondon 1 962
S T J OSEPH J K S ( 1936) S T J OSEPH J K S ( 1956)
1 931
R oman Y ork)
' The R oman F ort a t B rancaster' A ntiq J 1 6 1 936 p p 4 44-60 ' The R oman S ite n ear S tretton B ridge,
t he
A ncient P ennocrucium' T rans B irmingham A rch S oc 7 4 1 956
S T J OSEPH J K S ( 1969)
' Air R econnaissance i n B ritain, 1 969 p p 1 04-28
S ALISBURY F S ( 1927)
' On t he D ate o f t he N otitia D ignitatum' J RS 1 927 p p 1 02-6
S ALWAY P ( 1958)
' Civilians i n t he R oman F rontier R egion' A A4 3 6 1 958 p p 2 27-44
S ALWAY P ( 1967)
T he F rontier P eople o f R oman B ritain C ambridge 1 967 ' Excavations o n t he S ite o f t he R oman F ortress a t P evensey' S AC 5 1 1 907 p p 9 9-114
S ALZMAN L F ( 1907)
1 965-68' J RS 5 9 1 7
S ALZMAN L F ( 1908)A
' Excavations a t P evensey' S AC
S ALZMAN L F ( 1908)B
' Excavations o n t he S ite o f t he R oman F ortress a t P evensey 1 907-8' A rch J 6 5 1 908 p p 1 25-35
S AVAGE M ( 1979)
E xcavations o n H adrian's W all a t S ewingshields: I nterim R eport 1 979 H exham 1 979
S CHÖNBERGER H ( 1969)
' The R oman F rontier i n G ermany: A n A rchaeological S urvey' J RS 5 9 1 969 p p 1 44-197
S CHULTZ M S ( 1933)
' The R oman E vacuation o f B ritain' J RS p p 3 6-45
S COTT P R ( 1972)
' Excavations a t H olme H ouse ( West), P iercebridge 1 971 - S ummary R eport' D urham A rch N ewsbulletin 6 1 1 972
5 2 1 908 p p 8 3-95
S COTT P R ( 1977)
' Piercebridge' B ritannia 8 1 977 p 3 81
S COTT P R ( 1978)
' Excavations a t P iercebridge,
2 3
C o D urham ,
1 933
1 976-7
S ummary R eport' A rchaeological R eports S COTT P R a nd .L ARGE
S ( 1979)
S COTT P R a nd L ARGE S ( 1980)
f or 1 977, D urham 1 978 p p 1 6-21 ' Excavations a t P iercebridge' U niv o f D urham A rch R eports f or 1 978, D urham 1 979 p p 9 -10 ' Excavations a t P iercebridge 1 978-79' A rch R eports f or 1 979 U niv o f D urham 1 980 p p 1 1-12
S HAW R C ( 1925-6)
N otitia D ignitatum e d 0 S eeck ' An I nteresting D iscovery b earing o n t he F ourth C entury R econstruction o n t he W all' P SAN4
S HAW N ( 1959)
1 925-6 p p 2 2-3 ' Excavations a t W hitley C astle N orthumberland, 1 957 a nd 1 958' A A4 3 7 1 959 p p 1 91-202
S HIEL N ( 1977)
T he E pisode o f C arausius a nd A llectus B AR 4 0
S EECK 0 ( 1876)
S HOTTER D C A ( 1974) S HOTTER D C A ( 1978) S HOTTER D C A a nd W HITE A J ( 1977)
1 977 ' RIB 6 05 a nd t he L ancaster B ath-House' C ontrebis 2 1 1 974 p p 1 4-19 ' A h oard o f A ntoniniani f rom H ackensall H all F arm' L ancs A rch J 1 1 978 p p 4 7-52 ' Two h oards o f R oman C oins f rom t he L ancaster A rea' C W2 7 7 1 977 p p 1 73-78
S HRUBSOLE
G W
( 1890)
' The
Walls
o f
E dwardian' C AS
S IMPSON C ( 1971)
C hester:
Are
t hey R oman o r
3p 7 1-113
F oederati a nd L aeti i n L ate R oman F rontier D efence u npublished M P hil d issertation N ottingham U niv 1 971
S IMPSON C ( 1976)
' Belt-buckles a nd S trap-ends
o f
t he L ater R oman
E mpire a P reliminary S urvey o f S everal N ew G roups' B ritannia 7 1 976 p p 1 92-223 S IMPSON F G ( 1913)
' Excavations
o n t he L ine o f
t he R oman W all i n
C umberland d uring t he Y ears 1 913 p p 2 97-397 S IMPSON F G
1 909-12' C W2
' The R oman F ort a t N ewbrough p p 1 63-5
1 929-30) S IMPSON F G ( 1931)
' Excavations
P SAN 4 1 929-30
.
o n H adrian's W all b etween H eddon-
o n-the-Wall a nd N orth T yne i n p p 3 05-27 S IMPSON F G ( 1976)
1 3
1 930' AA4 8 1 931
W atermills a nd M ilitary W orks o n H adrian's W all E xcavations
i n N orthumberland
1 907-13 K endal
1 976 e d G S impson S IMPSON F G a nd H ODGSON K S ( 1948) S IMPSON F G a nd H OGG R ( 1935) S IMPSON F G a nd R ICHMOND
IA ( 1932)
S IMPSON F G a nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1933) S IMPSON F G a nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1934) S IMPSON F G a nd R ICHMOND
I A
( 1935)A S IMPSON F G a nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1935)B S IMPSON F G a nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1937) S IMPSON F G a nd R ICHMOND I A ( 1941) S IMPSON G ( 1962
' The C oastal M ile-Fortlet a t C ardurnock' C W2 4 8
1 948 p p
' Report o f f or
7 8-127
t he C umberland E xcavation C ommittee
1 935 p art
8 S tanwix' C W2
C W2 3 2
1 932 p p
C W2
3 3
1 933
' Report f or
1B irdoswald' C W2 o f
G ( 1973)
1 934 p p
1 20-30
1 934 p art 5 R andylands M ilecastle' C W2 3 5
1 935 p p
2 36-43
' Report o f f or C W2
3 4
t he C umberland E xcavation C ommittee
t he C umberland E xcavation C ommittee
1 934 p art 7 B ankshead M ilecastle 5 2' 3 5 1 935 p p 2 47-55
' The F ort o n H adrian's W all a t H alton' AA4 1 937 p p
1 4
1 51-70
.P etriana
a nd t he T actical A rrangement o f
H adrian's W all i n C umberland' D UJ 3 3 2 1 941 p p 1 02-10 ' Caerleon a nd t he R oman F orts 1 11
1 962 p p
‚C aerleon
i n W ales
1 03-66 2 S outhern W ales'
A C 1 12 1 963 p p 1 3-76 B ritons a nd t he R oman A rmy L ondon ' Roman
Manchester
a nd
a nd D ates r eviewed' R omans
i n t he
1N orthern W ales'
a nd t he R oman F orts i n W ales i n t he
S econd C entury A D P art
S IMPSON
1B irdoswald ‚
1 933 p p 2 46-62
' Report o f t he C umberland E xcavation C ommittee f or
A C
S IMPSON G ( 1964)
1 935 p p 2 56-58 1B irdoswald'
1 41-5
' Excavations o n H adrian's W all
S econd C entury A D P art S IMPSON G ( 1963)
3 5
' Excavations o n H adrian's W all
1 964
T empleborough :
i n G reeks,
e d C F C H awkes L ondon
T he F orts
C elts a nd 1 973
S MITH C R ( 1852)
T he R oman C astrum a t Lympne i n K ent L ondon
S MITH C R ( 1887)
' Roman C astrum a t L ympne
.
A rch C ant
1 8
1 852
1 887
p p 4 1-5 S PAIN G R B ( 1930)
' The T reasury V ault o f AA4 7 1 930 p p
S PRATT D A ( 1979)
t he R oman F ort a t B enwell ‚
1 26-31
T he A rchaeology o f C leveland M iddlesborough C ouncil e d D A S pratt
S TANFORD S TEAD
S C ( 1968)
IM ( 1956-8)
^T he R oman F orts a t L eintwardine a nd B uckton' W NFC 3 9.2 1 968 p p 2 22-326
' Excavations a t t he S outh C orner T ower o f R oman F ortress a t Y ork p p 5 15-38
1 956' Y AJ 3 9
t he
1 956-8
S TEER K A ( 1938)
T he A rchaeology o f R oman D urham Univ o f D urham P hD t hesis 1 938 u npublished
S TEER K A ( 1939)
' The E xcavations a t L anchester: T he C oarse P ottery' T AASDN 9 1 939-43 p p 1 12-22
S TEVENS C E ( 1940)
' The B ritish S ections o f t he N otitia D ignitatum' A rch J 4 7 1 940 p p 1 25-54
S TEVENS C E ( 1971)
' Progress R eport o n B ritain' i n A pplebaum p p 3 4-7
S TRICKLAND T J
' Chester' B ritannia 6 1 975 p p 2 41-2
1 971
( 1975) S TRICKLAND T J ( 1980) S TRICKLAND T J
' Grosvenor M useum E xcavations,
Hunter S treet
a nd H unter's W alk E xcavations' Newsletter J an 1 980 ' Chester' B ritannia
1 2
1 981 p p
3 31-3
( 1981)A S TRICKLAND T J
' Third C entury C hester' i n K ing a nd H enig p 4
( 1981)B S TRICKLAND T J a nd DAVEY P J ( 1978) S UMPTER A B a nd C OLL S ( 1977) S WANTON M J ( 1967)
N ew E vidence f or R oman C hester L iverpool 1 978 I nterval T ower S W5 a nd t he S outh-West D efences E xcavations
1 972-75 Y ork
1 977
' An E arly A lamannic B rooch f rom Y orkshire' Ant J 4 7
1 967 p p
4 3-50
TAYLOR S J ( 1972)
' Whilton L odge' B ritannia 3 1 972 p 3 25
T HOMAS R W ( 1911)
' Excavations R oman S tation L landrindod W ells A C
6 5
1 911 p p
4 11-20
T HOMAS N ( 1964)
' Mancetter' J RS
T HOMPSON E ( 1965)
T he E arly G ermans O xford
5 4
1 964 p p
1 64-5
1 965
T HOMPSON E ( 1977)
' Britain A D
T HOMPSON F H ( 1965)
R oman C heshire C hester
T HOMPSON F H ( 1969)
' Excavations a t L inenhall S treet, 1 961-2' C AS 5 6 1 969 p p 1 -22
T HOMPSON F H ( 1975)
4 06-10' B ritannia 8 1 977 p p
' The E xcavation o f
3 03-18
1 965 C hester,
t he R oman Amphitheatre a t
C hester' A rchaeologia
1 05
1 975 p p
1 27-241
T ODD M ( 1967)
' The R oman S ite a t L ittle C hester, D erby: E xcavations i n 1 966' D AJ 8 7 1 967 p p 7 0-85
T ODD M ( 1973) T ODD M ( 1975)
T he C oritani L ondon Y orks' A nt J 5 5
T ODD M ( 1978)A
1 973
' The " Alamannic" B rooch f rom L ondesborough, 1 975 p p
3 84-8
S tudies i n t he R omano-British V illa L eicester
1 978 e d M T odd
T ODD M ( 1978)B
T he W alls o f R ome L ondon
T OMLIN R S 0 ( 1972)
' Seniores ; J uniores i n t he L ate R oman F ield A rmy' A JP 9 3 2 1 972 p p 2 53-78
T OMLIN R S 0 ( 1973)
' The D ate o f t he " Barbarian C onspiracy " R oman N orthern F rontier S eminar V ol 9 1 973 p p 3 2-6
T OMLIN R S 0 ( 1974)
' The D ate o f
t he
1 978
" Barbarian C onspiracy "
B ritannia 5 1 974 p p 3 03-9 T URNBULL L ( 1963)
L ate F ourth C entury R oman P ottery i n N orthern B ritain u npublished B A d issertation N ewcastle u pon T yne J une
1 963
T URNBULL P a nd J ONES R F J ( 1979) V AN B ERCHEM D ( 1955)
' Chester-le-Street' B ritannia p 2 85 ' On s ome c hapters
o f
1 0
1 979
t he N otitia D ignitatum
r elating t o t he D efence o f G aul a nd B ritain' A JP LXXV1, 1 38-47 W ACHER J S ( 1964)
' Thorpe' J RS
W ACHER J S ( 1969)
E xcavations a t B rough-on-Humber
5 4
1 964 p 1 59 1 958-61
S oc o f A ntiq R esearch R eport X XV W ACHER J S ( 1971)
' Yorkshire T owns B utler
1 971A p p
1 969
i n t he F ourth C entury'
i n
1 65-78
W ACHER J S ( 1975)A
T he T owns o f R oman B ritain L ondon
W ACHER J S ( 1975)B
' Village F ortifications' 1 975 p p 5 1-2
W ADE W V ( 1950)
' Templeborough'
W ADE W V ( 1952)
' The R oman F ort a t B ainbridge, P LPLS 7 1 1 952 p p 1 -19
W ensleydale'
' The R oman F ort a t B ainbridge,
E xcavations
WADE W V ( 1955)
1 952 a nd W ARD
J ( 1901) J ( 1911)
1 901 p p
J ( 1914)
1 950 p 9 9
7 .3
1 955 p p
o f
1 53-66
i ts R oman O rigin' A rchaeologia
3 35-52
R omano-British B uildings a nd E arthworks L ondon
W ARD
4 0
1 953' P LPLS
' Cardiff C astle: 5 7
W ARD
J RS
1 975
i n R odwell a nd R owley
1 911
' Roman C ardiff
I II' A C
6 9
1 914 p p 4 07-10
W ATERMAN D M ( 1947)
' Excavations a t C lausentum 1 937-8' A nt J 2 7
W EBSTER G ( 1951)
R oman C hester,
1 947 p p
1 51-71 t he D efences a nd t he I ntramural
B uildings o f t he L egionary F ortress u npublished MA T hesis Manchester W EBSTER G ( 1953)
1 951
' Excavations o n t he L egionary D efences a t C hester 1 949 5 2 ( part 1 a nd 2 )' p t 2 1 -23 C AS 3 9-40 1 953
W EBSTER G ( 1969)
' The F uture o f V illa S tudies' P p
W EBSTER G ( 1971)
1 2 1-28,
i n R ivet
1 969
2 17-50
' A R oman S ystem o f F ortified P osts a long W atling S treet, p p
W EBSTER G ( 1974)
-p t
B ritain' i n A pplebaum 1 971
3 8-45
T he W est Midlands
i n t he R oman P eriod:
a
b rief s urvey T rans B irmingham a nd W arwickshire A rchaeological S oc W EBSTER G ( 1975)A
8 6
' Small T owns w ithout D efences' i n R odwell a nd R owley
1 975 p p 5 3-66
1975)B W EBSTER G (
T he C ornovii O ld W oking
W EBSTER G a nd
' An E xcavation o n t he R oman S ite a t L ittle
HARTLEY B R ( 1961)
C hester,
D erby' DAJ 8 1
1 975 1 961 p p
8 5-110
1979) W EBSTER P (
' Romano-British C oarse P ottery i n t he
W EBSTER P V a nd
N orth-West i n H igham 1 979 p p 1 5-20 ' Cardiff' B ritannia 6 1 975 p 2 22
W EBSTER J ( 1975) W EBSTER P V a nd
' Cardiff' B ritannia
7 1 976 p 2 98
WEBSTER J ( 1976) W EBSTER P V a nd
' Cardiff' B ritannia 9 1 978 p p 4 08-9
WEBSTER J ( 1978) WELSBY
D A ( 1980)
' Roman B uilding I nscriptions, b uildings
r ecording
c ollapsed t hrough a ge o r d estroyed
b y t he e nemy?' AAS
8 1 980 p p
8 9-94
WENHAM
L P ( 1959-62)
' Excavations
a nd Discoveries
within
L egionary F ortress i n D aveygate, Y AJ 4 0 1 956-62 p p 5 07-87 WENHAM L P ( 1965) W ENHAM L P ( 1974)
Y ork,
t he
1 955-8'
' The S outh-West Defences o f t he F ortress o f E buracum' i n J arrett a nd D obson 1 965 p p 1 -26 D erventio
( Halton):
R oman F ort a nd C ivil
S ettlement C ameo B ooks
1 974
W HEELER H M ( 1981)
' Littlechester' B ritannia
W HEELER R E M
' Excavations a t S egontium , A C 7 6 1 921 p p 1 70-204
1 921:
S econd R eport'
' Excavations a t S egontium, A C 7 8 1 923 p p 2 58-326
1 922:
F ourth Report'
( 1921) W HEELER R E M ( 1922)A W HEELER R E M ( 1922)B W HEELER R E M ( 1924) W HEELER R E M ( 1926)
' Roman C ardiff: 1 922 p p 3 61-70
1 2
1 981 p 3 35
S upplimentary N otes' A nt J 2
S egontium a nd t he R oman O ccupation o f W ales C ardiff 1 924 ' The R oman F ort n ear B recon' Y C ymmrodor
3 7
1 926
W HITWELL J B ( 1973)
' York' B ritannia 4 1 973 p 2 80
W HITWELL J B ( 1976)
' The C hurch S treet S ewer a nd a n Adjacent B uilding' C BA 1 976
W IGHTMAN E ( 1971)
' Some A spects o f
t he L ate R oman Defensive
S ystem i n G aul' i n A pplebaum 1 971 p p 4 6-51 W ILKES J ( 1960)
' Excavations a t H ousesteads 1 960 p p
WILKES
J ( 1961)
' Excavations a t H ousesteads 1 961 p p
W ILKES J ( 1966)
1 940 p p
S AC 8 2
1 941 p p
3 5-58 1 965
8 7-200
' The R oman F ort a t I lkley' Y AJ 2 8
1 925
1 37-321
' Roman B ritain i n 1 961 p p
Y OUNG C J ( 1977)
1 939'
1 73-204
' Six T urrets o n H adrian's W all' AA4 4 3
p p WRIGHT R P ( 1961)
S AC 8 0
' The End o f R oman S ussex a nd t he E arly Saxon
p p W OODWARD A M ( 1925)
1 966
1 93-213
S ettlements' W OODFIELD C ( 1965)
1 938'
i n H adrian's
' The E xcavations o n H ighdown H ill, A ugust 8 1
3 8
1 960 ' AA4 3 9
i n J arrett a nd D obson
' Excavations a t t he C aburn
S AC WILSON A E ( 1941)
i n
' Early F ourth C entury R ebuilding
1 939 p p W ILSON A E ( 1940)
1 959' A A4
2 79-300
W all F orts' p p 1 14-38 W ILSON A E ( 1939)
i n
6 1-72
1 960 I I
I nscriptions' J RS
1 91-98
O xfordshire R oman P ottery B AR 4 3
1 977
5 1
I NDEX O F P LACE N AMES A lchester A ldborough A lderney A lmondbury A mbleside A mid& A ntioch A pperley D ene A rdoch A rles A utun A venches
1 47, 1 52 1 49, 1 50 1 18 1 61 9 , 1 0, 2 2, 5 1, 6 6 1 1 00 6 6 1 3, 1 32, 1 48 1 46, 1 48 1 48
B aginton
1 9.
B ainbridge
2 1, 4 2-3, 6 4, 6 5, 7 0-1, 8 2, 9 0, 1 18, 1 22, 1 25 1 43 1 27 6 0 8 7 9 9-100 1 37,151 2 2, 1 40 9 , 1 0, 2 1, 2 4, 2 5, 3 0, 3 2, 3 5, 5 3, 5 8, 7 7, 7 9, 9 2, 9 4-5, 1 03, 1 13, 1 41, 1 60, 1 71 1 2, 2 0, 2 4, 4 3, 6 0, 6 3, 6 4, 7 6, 7 8, 9 4, 1 19, 1 25, 1 31 1 , 1 0, 2 0 , 2 4, 3 0, 3 2,33, 3 5, 3 6, 4 0, 4 9, 5 6, 5 7, 6 3, 6 8, 7 1-2, 7 8, 7 9, 8 1, 8 2, 8 4, 8 7, 9 1, 1 01, 1 03, 1 10, 1 11-2, 1 30, 1 31, 1 38, 1 41, 1 71, 1 72 1 0, 2 5 14, 1 15-6 5 2 1 14
B alline B almuildy B ar H ill B arrack F ell B avai B enwell B ewcastle B inchester B irdoswald
B irrens B itterne B onn B owes B owness o n S olway B oxmoor B raäwell B rancaster B rean D own B recon G aer B rislington B röugh B rough-on-Humber B rough-on-Noe B rougham B rugh-by-Sands B urgh C astle B urghwallis B urrow-in-Lonsdale B urrow W alls B usiris
6 1,
1 18,
1 19
5 5
2 7, 3 7, 1 10, 1 39 1 07 1 4, 1 6, 1 7, 5 0 1 2, 1 3, 1 4, 1 5, 1 7, 2 3, 3 1, 5 1, 5 7, 1 37, 1 42, 1 47, 1 52, 1 54, 1 65, 1 72 1 55 9 , 2 5, 4 7, 5 8, 1 12-3, 1 20 1 07 1 52 2 0, 4 3, 7 3, 1 44, 1 47, 1 49, 1 55 6 , 2 1, 4 3-4, 6 1, 7 8, 7 9, 8 2-3, 9 3, 1 02 14, 1 43 3 2, 1 38 1 2, 1 4, 1 5, 1 6, 1 7, 2 9, 4 3, 5 1-2, 5 3, 6 5, 1 37 4 4 6 4-5, 6 9, 1 02 1 14 1 39
7 , 1 14, 1 15, 1 28 1 3, 1 26, 1 28 9 , 2 2, 2 7, 2 9, 4 7-8,
C aer G ybi C aerhun C aerleon C aernarvon
C aersws C aister-by-Norwich C aister-by-Yarmouth C aistor C ambridge C anterbury C ardiff C arisbrooke C arlisle C armarthen C armel H ead C arnunt iu t C arpow C arrawburgh C arthage C astell C oh en C astlecary C astlesteads C atterick C aves I nn C awfields C awthorn C helmsford C hester C hester-le-Street C hesterholm
C hesters C hesterton C issbury C oburn C olchester C oleraine C optOs C orbridge C orton C rambeck C ramond C ripplegate D oncaster D orchester D orn D over D riffield D robeta
( Oxon)
6 0,
7 9,
8 5
2 0, 2 2, 2 5, 3 1, 4 8-9, 5 6, 6 0, 6 2, 7 9, 8 0, 8 1, 8 6, 9 6-7, 1 02, 1 18, 19, 1 22, 1 26, 1 28, 1 44, 1 62, 1 67, 1 72 2 4, 3 1, 4 9, 8 5, 1 20 5 1, 1 47, 1 59, 1 60 1 3, 1 4, 5 2, 6 4, 1 49 1 47 1 48 5 2, 1 47 7 , 8 , 1 2, 1 9, 2 5, 2 9, 4 9, 8 5, 9 3, 1 55 2 0 1 , 6 , 5 9, 9 9, 1 00, 1 24, 1 30 1 55 1 28 8 0 9 , 2 3, 2 4, 6 8, 6 9 2 2, 3 7, 5 7, 6 0, 7 1, 7 7, 1 62 6 7 9 , 4 9, 6 0, 7 0, 7 1, 1 72 6 0 3 7 1 49-50, 1 54 1 51, 1 52 5 7 6 2 1 47 1 , 6 , 9 , 2 2, 2 4, 2 5, 2 7, 2 9, 4 4, 6 2, 6 9, 7 4-6, 7 8, 7 9, 8 4, 8 5, 9 5, 1 26, 1 44, 1 62, 1 66 4 5, 1 14, 1 19 9 , 1 1, 2 0, 2 2, 2 3, 2 5, 2 6, 2 7, 3 0, 3 2, 3 3, 3 7-8, 6 3, 6 4, 7 6, 8 0, 8 1, 8 6, 8 7, 8 9, 9 0, 9 6 , 1 10, 1 20, 1 24, 1 30, 1 39, 1 69 6 3, 8 1, 8 8, 8 9, 14, 1 19, 1 20, 1 40 1 52 1 64 1 64 1 46, 1 48, 1 49 1 27 1 38 1 , 6 , 3 6, 8 4, 1 24, 1 28, 1 42, 1 49, 1 50, 1 54 1 8 1 71 2 4, 6 9 ( see L ondon) 9 , 2 7, 4 5, 7 1, 7 2, 8 3, 9 6, 1 22, 1 38, 1 62 1 52 1 52 6 , 9 , 1 2, 1 3, 1 4, 1 7, 2 0, 2 5, 2 9, 5 2, 5 3, 1 61 2 3
1 37
E ast B ridgeford
1 52
E bchester E lslack E rmelo E xeter
2 7, 3 0, 4 5, 6 4-5, 6 9 6 9 1 46, 1 52
F lamborough H ead F orden G aer F urfooz
1 17 2 4, 5 0, 9 7 1 61, 1 64
G ellygaer G emellae G estinthorpe G heriat e l-Garbia G loucester G oldsborough G orhambury G ornea G ran :Kona G reat C asterton G reat C hesterford G reat C hesters G reta B ridge
1 3 7 1 1 61 1 3 1 46, 1 48, 1 53 1 17, 1 31 1 07 6 7 1 37 1 47, 1 48 1 48 3 0 , 3 2, 3 8, 8 0, 9 2, 1 24, 1 62
H adleigh H altonchesters
1 8 6 , 1 6, 2 5, 3 0, 1 03, 1 09, 1 17, 1 0, 1 3, 2 2 1 00 1 18
H ardknot H artburn H artlepool H en W aliau ( Caernarvon) H igh C ross H igh R ochester H ighdown H ill H odhill H olyhead M ountain H orncastle H ousesteads
H untcliff
7 9,
8 0,
8 1,
8 9,
8 1,
9 5,
1 21,
3 8-9, 4 1, 1 24, 1 40,
9 2
1 39,
5 6, 5 7, 1 41
1 42
6 1,
6 2,
6 3,
8 6,
1 7 1 52 9 , 1 1, 2 5, 3 0, 3 2, 3 3, 6 1, 6 2, 6 3, 6 7, 7 0, 7 6, 7 7, 8 0, 8 1, 8 2, 9 2, 1 03, 1 24 1 64 5 3 1 28 1 47 2 6 , 2 7, 3 0, 3 2, 3 9-40 , 5 7, 6 1, 6 3, 6 8 , 7 1, 7 2, 7 6, 7 7, 7 8, 8 0, 8 1, 8 7, 8 9, 9 0, 9 4, 9 5, 1 03, 11, 1 12, 1 13, 1 14, 1 18, 1 20, 1 21, 1 23, 1 40, 1 42, 1 57, 1 65 1 17, 1 31
I lkley
9 , 1 0, 2 6, 4 5, 1 19, 1 20, 1 21,
J arrow J edburgh
1 18 3 3
K aiseraugst K eynsham K ings W eston K nag B urn g ateway K öln
7 4, 1 26 1 07 1 07 7 1 3 , 1 46, 1 51
7 1, 7 2, 1 22
7 8,
7 9,
8 1,
8 3-4,
8 5,
9 0,
L ancaster L anchester L ankhills L auriacum L e M ans L eintwardine L incoln L ittlechester
2 4, 4 5, 7 6, 8 5, 9 3, 1 02, 1 14, 1 25 1 2, 2 0, 2 2, 3 2, 3 3, 4 5, 1 02, 1 03, ( see W inchester) 1 34 1 8 2 0, 2 1, 2 4, 5 0, 7 9, 8 4, 1 31 7 5, 1 46, 1 48, 1 52, 1 53 6 9-70, 1 24, 1 52
L ondesborough L ondon L oughor L ow B urrow B ridge L ydney L ympne
1 61 7 , 1 8, 7 5, 1 05, 1 47, 1 48, 1 49, 5 0 9 , 1 0 1 55 6 , 1 6, 1 7, 2 3, 2 5, 2 8, 3 1, 5 2, 1 36, 1 37, 1 49, 1 54, 1 65
M ägis
1 42, 1 43 1 42, 1 43 3 , 6 7, 1 42 9 , 1 0, 2 0, 2 7, 4 5-6, 5 6, 6 0, 7 1, 7 6, 8 1, 8 8, 8 9, 9 0, 1 02, 1 13, 1 20, 1 21, 1 23, 1 25, 1 44, 1 49, 1 55, 1 72 1 51, 1 52 9 , 1 0 1 37 2 6, 3 1, 3 3, 3 4, 4 0, 8 1, 9 0, 1 21, 1 62 2 2 1 48, 1 52 8 7, 1 11 8 7
M ainz M alton
M ancetter M anchester Marcae M aryport M elandra C astle M ildenhall M ilecastle 9 t 1 3
i t
2 2 2 9 3 2 3 5 3 6 3 7 3 8 3 9 4 0 4 8 4 9 5 0
1 6 1 11 8 7, 1 11 4 2, 8 7, 1 09 1 6 1 6, 8 7, 1 11, 1 12 1 6 1 6 1 6, 4 2, 7 2, 8 7, 1 11 1 , 4 2, 8 1, 8 2, 8 7, 1 11, 1 6 8 7
t
5 1 5 2 5 4
7 2, 1 6, 1 6,
8 7 7 2, 8 7, 1 11
7 9 M ilefortlet 5 1 2 2 0 M offat M onkwearmouth
1 6, 8 7 6 2, 9 9, 9 9 9 9 6 9 1 18
M ucking
1 59
N etherby N ewbrough N ewcastle u pon T yne
2 3, 9 8 1 0 ,
N ewstead
1 2, 8 0
1 38
1 11
1 02,
1 15
3 2,
1 03,
1 08,
4 0,
9 2,
1 19,
1 39, 1 40,
1 40 1 41
1 14,
1 43
1 55
5 3,
7 5,
1 01,
1 02,
N ewton K yme N imes N orth W raxall N ovae N ovaesiam
5 7, 6 9 1 48 1 07, 1 08 7 5 4 8
O ld C arlisle O ld P enrith O ldaport O lenacum O nagrinum O rsova O udenburg
1 39, 1 40, 1 42 2 0, 4 6, 7 0 , 8 6, 1 55 1 38, 1 39 6 7 6 7 3 2
P almyra P apcastle P aris P ark S treet P embroke P ergamum P erge P evensey P iercebridge
2 3, 1 38 3 2, 4 6, 7 0, 7 9, 8 2, 1 22, 1 44 1 37, 1 55 1 07 1 55 6 7 6 6 1 6, 1 7, 2 8, 5 2-3, 6 5, 6 6, 1 16, 1 29, 1 37, 1 54 8 , 1 5, 2 3, 2 5, 3 1, 4 6, 5 1, 5 7, 6 4, 6 5, 6 9, 8 6, 9 2, 9 8, 1 24, 1 43, 1 55 1 11 1 6, 1 7, 2 5, 2 8, 3 1, 5 3-4, 5 9, 6 3, 6 5, 8 3, 8 8, 1 01, 1 15, 1 36 7 5
P ike H ill P ortchester P otaissa R avenglass R avenscar R eculver
R ed H ill R emagen R heims R ibchester R ichborough R isingham R ochester R ome R ossington B ridge R udchester
S alamis S caftworth S carborough S cunthorpe S ea M ills S eaham S enlis S ide S ilchester
9 9,
1 00,
1 09,
1 25,
1 43
2 6, 2 7, 4 0-1, 8 1, 9 0, 1 06, 1 21, 1 22, 1 31 1 16, 1 17 1 2, 1 3, 1 4, 1 5, 1 7, 2 3, 2 4, 2 5, 2 9, 3 0, 3 1, 5 1, 5 4, 5 7, 5 9, 6 4, 7 8, 8 1, 8 8, 1 01, 1 02, 1 36, 1 37, 1 42, 1 47, 1 52, 1 54, 1 65 1 51, 1 52 7 5 1 46 3 1, 1 26, 1 38, 1 40, 1 43, 1 44 1 4, 1 6, 1 7, 1 8, 2 0, 2 3, 2 5, 2 8, 3 1, 4 4, 5 4-5, 6 3, 6 5, 6 6, 8 5, 1 25, 1 31, 1 49, 1 54, 1 66 8 , 1 6, 2 5, 3 2, 4 1, 5 7, 6 2, 7 0, 7 5, 7 6, 8 3, 9 2, 1 01, 1 03, 1 42, 1 71 1 49, 1 52 1 8, 6 6, 7 2, 1 30, 1 62 1 70 6 , 4 1, 5 6, 5 7, 6 4, 8 6, 1 03, 1 09, 1 10, 1 24, 1 40, 1 41, 1 72 6 2 1 14 1 17 5 1 1 55 1 18 1 8 6 6 1 46,
1 48,
1 52
S ingara S irniun S outh S hields S tanwix S toke H ill S toney S tratford S trasbourg S tretton B ridge
6 6 1 26 9 , 1 0, 1 5, 2 2, 2 3, 9 7, 1 02, 1 14, 1 28, 8 3 1 00 1 52 7 5 1 51, 1 52 1 26,
2 4 , 3 6, 4 1, 5 6, 1 38, 1 40, 1 41
5 7,
7 6,
8 6,
1 67
T adcaster T agaestun ( Burg b ei S tein a m R hein) T empleborough T hornham T horpe T ongres T ournai T owcester T ower 1 6a T raprain L aw T rier T urret 7 b 3 3b 4 4b 4 8a 5 1b
5 3 1 8, 4 1, 4 6, 5 7, 1 8 1 52 1 37, 1 48, 1 51 1 37 1 52 9 9 1 27 1 28, 1 30 8 7, 1 11 1 60 8 7 , 11 8 7 1 11
1 1 .nentun
6 3
V alkenburg V ernlaniun V ienne V indonissa V itudurun ( Oberwinterthus)
1 3 1 07, 1 46, 1 47, 1 48 4 8, 5 3, 8 0
5 8,
1 13
1 48
5 3 1 51, 1 52 2 7, 4 2, 7 2,
W all W alls e nd W alton C astle W alwick F ell W apping W atercrook W esterwood W hilton L odge W hitby W hitley C astle W ickford W inchester W reay W roxeter
1 4, 6 9 1 8 1 1, 8 7 1 52 1 17 6 6 , 1 47 1 46, 9 9, 1 46,
X anten
5 2
Y ork
1 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 1 2, 2 9, 4 6-7, 7 3-4, 7 8, 7 9, 8 3, 8 5, 8 7, 1 29, 1 31, 1 57, 1 62, 1 66
8 1,
8 3,
1 03
8 4 ,
8 5,
8 9,
1 21
1 7
1 8,
4 6,
5 7,
7 9,
8 3,
1 02
1 48, 1 00 1 49,
1 63 1 50 ,
1 51
5 1, 9 3,
6 2-3, 6 5, 1 08, 1 19,
6 9, 1 23,
MAP
1
M ilitary S ites O ccupied i n t he T hird a nd/or F ourth C enturies
1
P ortchester
2 3
P evensey L ympne
4 5 6
D over R ichborough R eculver
7 8
W apping B radwell
9 W alton C astle 1 0 B urgh C astle 1 1 B rancaster 1 2 F iley 1 3 S carborough 1 4 R avenscar 1 5 G oldsborough 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9
H untcliff B rougham C rammond C arpow
4 1 B rough-on-Noe 4 2 T empleborough
8 1
N ewbrough
8 2 8 3 8 4 8 5
C arrawburgh H ousesteads C hesterholm G reat C hesters
8 6 8 7
C arvoran C astlesteads
8 8
S tanwix
5 0 R ibchester 5 1 B urrow-in-Lonsdale
8 9 9 0 9 1
B urgh-by-Sands D rumburgh B owness-on-Solway
5 2 B ainbridge 5 3 W atercrook
9 2 9 3
M ilefortlet 5 S outh S hields
4 3 D oncaster 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 7
S caftworth M alton Y ork N ewton K yme
4 8 I lkley 4 9 E lslack
5 4 Ambleside 5 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9
L ow B urrow B ridge B rough-under-Stainmore B owes G reta B ridge 9 4 P iercebridge 9 5
S ites p ossibly c onnected w ith t he M ilitary B itterne S tretton B ridge
2 0 B eckfoot 2 1 M aryport 2 2 B urrow W alls
6 0 B inchester
9 6
W all
6 1 C hester-le-Street 6 2 L anchester
9 7 9 8
M ancetter H igh C ross
2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6
6 3 E bchester 6 4 W hitley C astle 6 5 K irkby T hore
9 9 R ed H ill 1 00 C aves I nn 1 01 W hilton L odge
2 7 C aerhun 2 8 C aer G ybi 2 9 C aernarvon
6 6 6 7 6 8 6 9
1 02 H orncastle 1 03 C aister-byY armouth 1 04 C aistor ( Lincs)
3 0 L oughor
7 0 P apcastle
1 05 B rough-on-Humber
3 1 C ardiff 3 2 C aerleon
7 1 N etherby
1 06 C atterick
M oresby R avenglass L ancaster C hester
3 3 B gecon G aer 3 4 C astel C ollen
O ld P enrith B arrack F ell W reay O ld C arlisle
7 2 B ewcastle 7 3 R isingham 7 4 H igh R ochester
3 5 C aersws H adrian's W all
3 6 F orden G aer 3 7 L eintwardine 3 8 B aginton
7 5 W allsend
3 9 L ittlechester
7 6 N ewcastle
4 0 M anchester
7 7 7 8 7 9 8 0
B enwell R udchester H altonchesters C hesters
t e 3
8 2
8 0
,— •
7 9
8 1 8 4
7 7"
M i l itary s i tes o ccup ied i n t he t h ird a nd/or f ourth c en tu r ies
5 4 24
5 1 '
4 5.
2 5
•4 8
4.9
4 8
4 7
5 0 4 3 •
4 0 ' . 4 1
4 2
.4 4
3 ?
7
65. 4 3
9 4
NA P 1
2
MAP 2
T he D istribution o f C rambeck P archment W ares o n M ilitary S ites ( Corder t ypes 5 b, j , . , 9 a nd 1 0)
1 2 3
C hester M anchester R ibchester
4 5
E lslack I lkley
6 7 8
Y ork M alton F iley
9 S carborough 1 0 G oldsborough 1 1 H untcliff 1 2 C hester-le-Street 1 3 E bchester 1 4 B inchester 1 5 P iercebridge 1 6 B ainbridge 1 7 L ancaster 1 8 L ow B urrow B ridge 1 9 A mbleside 2 0 B rough 2 1 K irkby T hore 2 2 B rougham
2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6
O ld P enrith P apcastle R avenglass B urrow W alls
2 7 M aryport 2 8 B owness-on-Solway 2 9 B irdoswald 3 0 M ilecastle 4 8, P oltross B urn 3 1 M ilecastle 4 0, W inshields 3 2 C hesterholm 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7
H ousesteads C arrawburgh M ilecastle 2 9, C hesters H altonhesters
T ower T ye
3 8 R udchester 3 9 B enwell 4 0 N ewcastle u pon T yne 4 1 W allsend 4 2 S outh S hields 4 3 C rambeck ( kiln s ite) 4 4 C astell C ollen ( ?)
3 5
2 3 •
7 2 6
OZ . 4 2 4
. 2 1 6
.9
2 0
•8
2 5
0 4 3
4 W
6 . •4
•
4 ,3
. 2
T he d i s t r ibut ion o f C rambeck p archment wares o n m i l itary s i tes ( Corder t ypes
5 b , 7 ,8 ,9 a nd 1 0 )
M AP 2
MAP 3
T he N otitia D ignitatum O ccidentis C hapter X L
F orts l isted ' sub d ispositione v iri s pectabilis d ucis B ritanniarum'
s ub-heading v alli'
1
D anum - D oncaster
1 3 S egedunum - W allsend
2 3 4
S extae - Y ork D erventio - M alton L avatris - B owes
1 4 P ons A elius - N ewcastle
5
V erteris - B rough u nder S tainmore
6 7 8
B ravoniacum - K irkby T hore L ongovicium - L anchester C oncangis - C hester-le-Street
9
A rbeia South S hields
F orts l isted u nder t he ' item p er l ineam
u pon T yne 1 5 C ondercum - B enwell 1 6 V indovala - R udchester 1 7 O nnum - H altonchesters 1 8 C ilurnum - C hesters 1 9 B rocolitia - C arrawburgh 2 0 V ercovicium Housesteads 2 1 V indolanda - C hesterholm 2 2 A esica - G reat C hesters
F orts l isted u nder t his h eading
2 3 M agis - C arvoran
probably i dentifiable t hus
2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9
1 0 M orbium - ? Piercebridge 1 1 M orbium - ? Greta B ridge 1 2 Magis o r Maglona - ? Old C arlisle F orts n ot i dentified o n t he g round
D ictim
C amboglanna - C astlesteads P etriana - S tanwix A ballava - B urgh-by-Sands C ongavata - D rumburgh G abrosentum - Moresby G lanoventa - R avenglass
3 0 B remetennacum - R ibchester 3 1 V irosidum - B ainbridge
( Dictum )
P raesidium
F orts l istd u nder t his s ub-heading p robably i dentifiable t hus:-
3 2 A xelodunum - N etherby
F orts n ot i dentified o n t he A round A lione ( ?Alauna) T unnocelum ( Itunocelum) O lenacum
3 2
2 3
2 4
_
2 2 _
-4 • 11 -
4 1 2 ,21
1
;
18 _
1 1
2 1
•
8
*1 2
I7
6 2 8
29 3 1
•
30
T he No t i t ia D ign ita tum
O cc iden t is c hap ter X L
M AP
3
,-
=
I
1 .C arpow 2 . B rancas ter
I7 _ -I :
_
, \ I II
I
I
I II
I
I
I Ii
I
II
II
II
II
I
II
I
II
I
I
1
•
II ;I ;
I
I I,
I
I
, ;
\•_ _
F IG.
1
L 1 .R ecu lver 2 . P i ercebr idge
F IG. 2
.
I _
_ 'Z -
, " ',
L 2 -
7
_ :i.
1:
2_ 7 :. •
II I
11
I II
I I
I '
I t II
I i
I
II
I I
II
I
I
I I I
I
II I,
II I II
I
I
I
1 . B u r row i n L onsda le 2 . E l s lack
amu l ma i sa m m o mm o m mimininam
\ -
—
MO M
a lb .
#
• • ••
1 .B radwe l l
0
2 . Wa lton C as t le
5 0.
( no t t o s ca le )
F IG.
4
1 .R i chbo rough 2 .D over
h i
pA M IN =
‚ J IB ,
1-
F IG.
5
\
e
1 .L y mpne 5 0
2 . P evensey
Z
= F IG. 6
1 .P o r tches ter 0
50. 4
2 .B u rgh C as t le
17
1
F IG. 7
1 . C ard i f f 0 In e l;
2 . B ag inton -
gee
F IG.
8
5 0m 1 2 e1 . 5
2
=9
; 0 1 1 1 111 1/ 1 - _ -
1 .B i t terne 5 0.
2 . C a is ter-on-Sea
F IG.
9
1 .C a istor 0
2 . H orncast le
F IG. 1 0
... .. ..
/ /
/ / / / / /
7
I
I l / I 4 1
/ 1
1 .B rough-on -Humbe r
C , I '
o
2 . Mance t ter
F IG.
1 1
3 ' . .
5 0.
4 1 .C ave 's I nn 2 . Wa l l
F IG.
1 2
r
1 .S t re t ton B r idge
( -
J 2 . R ed H i l l
3 . Wapp ing
--
F IG.
1 3
c 'a 0 00
1 .R i chborough 3 . Wreay H a l l
2 . B arrock F e l l
U
-
F IG.
1 4
• ••
= 74
1
1
i 1 I 1
I 1te s ie =
i
1
1
I
I
I
-
II
I I I I lI
q- -
I
I
,_
- -
-
-
i t- -
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
-
-
_ \
S .
z -
- - - -
1 .S caf twor th 2 . N e wbrough
1 7
1
= = = = i ! ! I ! I
!
F IG.
1 5
_
/
7
I I
\ 1
f
i
I
I I
i \
I
ä
1 .C a rdu rnock
2 . C ae r G yb i
•
4 . S carborough
3 . H un tc l i f f
/I
F IG.
1 6
•
20.
f e
S 2
5 . Go ldsborough
9
41
--
1 .S outh S h ie lds
2 . H ardkno t
3 . C aste I I C o l ien
4 . B e wcas t le
5 . R i s ingham
C hes te rho lm
7. R ecu lver
I I F IG.
1 7
_
1 .P i e rcebr idge
f s )
L i
2 . B u rro w i n L onsda le
r e )
3 , B ag in ton
A
5 . B urgh C as t le
6 . Amb les ide
4 . R i chborough
7 . L ympne 0
F IG.
1 8
5 . ,
1 .P evensey
A
U .
2 . P ortches ter
F IG.
1 9
LI
0
1 .C ard if f
2 . B rough-on -Humbe r
-
-
-
L . 1
3 . B a inbr idge
4 . R i s ingham
5 .C orbr idge
F IG. 2 0
A
5 , 4
f l ,
2 M i lecast le 1 . K nag
5 2
B urn -
r
4 . Mahon
3 . H igh R ochester
5 . D over
L
-
6 .E ls lack
7 .C aernarvon
F IG.
2 1
-
1 . Gher ia t e l -Garb ia
-
2 . R ecu lver
3 . B urgh
A
C ast le
4 . C ard if f
6 . P or tchester
5 . R ichborough
7 . D over
8 . B radwe l l
9 . L y mpne• F IG.
2 2
_
1 .Y ork
A
2 . H igh R ochester
3 . C aer Gyb i
4 . C hester
F IG.
?5
_
A
1 .Y ork
! Pr-
1 ,
4
1
2 . Mahon
3 .G reat Ches ters
i 4 . H igh
R oches ter F lu.
2 4
1 .G reat C hes ters
A
2 . R i s ingham
A
3 .C hes terho lm
1 0. ,
4 . P ier cebr idge F IG.
2 5
A
4 00.... . .. . .. . .«.
B
H o us e s teads
o
C
D
E F IG.
2 6
1 .H a lton
C hesters
2 . E bches ter 3 . B recon
4 . R ecu lver
Gae r
1 0.
A
5 .C aernarvon F IG.
2 ?
1 .I _ mpne
2 . R i chbo rough n
ew i m a hmi l i, mm i
muu
l
1 L
A
3 .
I l k ley
l i
I i
I
/
4 . S outh
S h ie lds
F IG.
2 8
I I I
I
I
LJ I
I
3 1 2
1 .B a inbr idge 2 .B rough-on-Noe
I I
I II
I I
'
I
I I, I
, I I
- -
I , I
I II
I iI
_
F IG.
29
1 .C aernarvon 0
2 . B a inbr idge
a •
r r
,
I I
I
I I
—
—
F IG.
3 0
1 0n ,
i
I I
I
;
I
I
II I _ _
I1 I1 I1
i1 1I
IL
I i
I N I
1 .C arpow 2 . C o rb r idge
A
_1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
;_ r—L . , t . , , . 2
-r e •
r1
!
r• IP
i i
f i --
r
r—.
r——
E . :. 7B BB
F IG. 3 1
r
—
1 .C hesterho lm 2 . S outh
S h ie lds
Fl i.
3 2
1 . B rancas te r ' C•
2 . R ecu lver
F IG.
3 3
1
-
iI iI
I
II I 1I I II
I 1i
i1 II
II H II
II
I iI
II
J I
i I
_
- _
1 .L ympne 2 . R i chborough
F IG. 3 4
_ I
__ _ _ _ _
- -r
-J
_ J
3
r i
i
1 .R i s ingham 2 . H igh
R oches ter
F IG.
3 5
I
1 .C aernarvon 2 . C hes terho lm
1 .H ousesteads 2 . D robe ta
1 1
1 1 I l I
11
I
F IG.
37
/
•
/
/
/
/
•
/
/
I I
/
•
•
•
\ \
\ \ \
\ \
•
•
---
---
--
1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1L -J
---
r
--
o
P a lmyra
F IG. 3 8
1 .C arpo w o
2 .L ancaste r
i ß
- --
1
-
--
F IG.
3 9
1 0f f ,
m
I id
2 . B rough-on -Noe
1 .C aers ws 0
3 .C aernarvon
F IG. 4 0
1 C ,
1
1
a
A
I l k ley
o
B
F IG. 4 1
-
•
1 . B inches ter
r i
r
I
I I
I
'
I
' M I
2 .Chesterho lm
C
1 3 . Chesters
F IG. 4 2
r z : =
• 1
•
A
1
" 93 "
"
1
8
1: 1
f f ln ! I
L
I
1
1 .H ousesteads
2 . G reat C hes ters
1 0,
3 .H igh R ochester
F IG.
1 + 3
9 1 1 1 1 MBO I
MI
BE M 1 1• 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 f l M
A
1 .H igh R oches te r
_
3 . Ma l ton 4 . E bche s ter
2 . C ae rnarvon F IG.
4 4
A l( e ar ly f o rm )
. . n , l , i i , , . I , , , , , I , , 7 -
r
-
-
I I
i l
I
t1
l
1
-J
_ _ J
L .-- _ _ _ _ _ JJ
-
L
A 2( l a te r f o rm ) --
IIII I 1
I
I
Wa l lsend
II 1
I1 1I •1
I
11 1 1 1 1I 1 1 1
L
1I II
1
Ii
1I II
111 I
IL _ _
-
1
1 11 1 I1 1I
1
1I 1I 1I
tI i I 1
I1
1I __ ' IL _ _ _ .1
1
=
1t
_
-
I
_ .
J
I
i
F IG. 4 5
1
_
I1 11 1 I 11 1 1 1 1 i
-
7 -
1 1 1 1 1 11 Z
1 . I l k ley
2 . Wa l lsend B IN
_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 r7
- 7
=1/11
-
3 . B owness - 1• 1 .
4 . Marypo r t
5 . R aveng lass
F IG.
4 6
1 .R ecu lver -
7 .W W I
L
i
i me
2 . E bchester
I t-
I - -
-
I II
3 . P apcast le
4 .
B a inbr idge
F IG.
4 7
-
II I 1
I I
_ J
— —
—
_ J
1
r —
1
_ _ —
_
—
_
,
I I
I I I
Ii
II
I
I1
I
II I I
I1
Ii
I1
I1
II I, I I iI
II I I I I I
II
i
1I
II s e 1i
P i II
L H
I1
II
I
I1
iI
I I i
II
1i
-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
I 1 I I i II
I
l ! 1
iI
i i i
I I - _I
I
1 .Y ork
41
2 . B rough-on-Noe
•
3 . R aveng lass
1 6.
7
4 . B a inbr idge
F IG.
4 8
1 .B i rdos wa ld
2 .H ousesteads
E : 3 ]
A 3 .R i chborough
0
i n
(
A
4 . P or tches ter
0
F IG. 4 9
0
0
o
0
1 .B i rdos wa ld
B
U
U o
A
‘ e .
2 .C aernarvon
F IG. 5 0
P I M I M I
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 . 0 =
--
--
7 .=
A 1 0 . o u
1 . Wa l lsend
2 . R i chborougk
0
3 . B a inbr idge --
1
0
I
1 5
1 4
F IG.
5 1
II - -
0
I .
1 .P ierceb r idge 2 . C hes ter
F IG . 5 2