230 15 200MB
English Pages [408] Year 1988
Neolithic Settlement of the Thames Basin
Robin Holgate
BAR British Series 194 1988
B.A.R.
5, Centremead, Osney Mead, Oxford OX2 ODQ, England.
GENERAL EDITORS A.R. Hands, B.Sc., M.A., D.Phil. D.R. Walker, M.A.
BAR 194, 1988: 'Neolithic Settlement of the Thames Basin' © Robin Holgate , 1988 The author’s moral rights under the 1988 UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act are hereby expressly asserted. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be copied, reproduced, stored, sold, distributed, scanned, saved in any form of digital format or transmitted in any form digitally, without the written permission of the Publisher. ISBN 9780860545637 paperback ISBN 9781407318141 e-book DOI https://doi.org/10.30861/9780860545637 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available at www.barpublishing.com
C ontents A cknowledgements
i i
N ote o n t he u se o f r adiocarbon d ates L ist o f f igures
v i
L ist o f m aps
i x
L ist o f t ables
P ART I :
x ii
B ACKGROUND A ND M ETHODOLOGY
C hapter 1 .
I ntroduction
C hapter 2 .
B ackground
1 t o
t he e nquiry:
t he
c hronological
3
f ramework C hapter 3 .
P hysical b ackground a nd e nvironment o f t he T hames
1 5
b asin C hapter 4 .
L andscape
c hange a nd t he c haracter o f
n eolithic
2 8
d omestic s ites C hapter 5 .
P ART I I:
THE E VIDENCE F OR S ETTLEMENT A ND E CONOMY
C hapter 6 .
S ettlement o f t he T hames b asin,
C hapter 7 .
P ART I II: C hapter
3 5
T he s tudy o f f lint a ssemblages
S ubsistence,
r esource
T hames b asin,
5 000 - 2 000 b .c.
u se
5 000 - 2 000 b .c.
a nd e conomy
o f
7 1
t he
1 20
R econstructing s ettlement p atterns a nd e conomy o f
1 29
D ISCUSSION 8 .
t he T hames b asin,
5 000 - 2 000 b .c.
C hapter 9 .
C omparative p erspectives: s ettlement p atterns i n a djacent c ontinental E urope, 5 000 - 2 000 b .c.
1 37
C hapter 1 0.
S ummary a nd C onclusions
1 50
B ibliography
1 58
M aps a nd G azetteer
2 00
( i)
A cknowledgements T his s tudy i s a n a mended v ersion o f m y D .Phil. t o
t he
U niversity o f O xford i n 1 987.
t hesis,
s ubmitted
T he r esearch w as c arried
o ut
w hilst i n r eceipt o f a D epartment o f E ducation a nd S cience M ajor S tate S tudentship.
I
s upervisor,
w ould
D r.
p articularly
A ndrew S herratt,
l ike
t o
t hank
m y
t hroughout t he p roduction o f t he t hesis a nd m y e xaminers, B arfield a nd M r.
D ennis B ritton,
r esearch
f or h is h elp a nd c onstant s upport D r.
L awrence
f or t heir c omments.
I a m a lso i ndebted t o t he m any p eople w ho h ave s hown m e f lintwork i n t heir c are o r p rovided i nformation o n c ertain s ites; f ollows:
t hey a re a s
M useum C urators: A bingdon M useum : P itts; P ike;
N .
S tebbing;
A lexander K eiller M useum, A vebury :
B uckinghamshire C ounty M useum, B anbury
M useum :
J .
V ale;
W illis
( Hampshire C ounty M useum S ervice), M useum a nd A rt G allery: S .
F eather;
J .
U niversity
C ambridge:
M .
P eirson J ones; o f
E ast
C helmsford
L arkin;
C orinium
B aker;
S ociety M useum,
P .
D evizes: G rays:
H arlow M useum :
R .
P . R .
S ealey;
B ingley;
M useum :
A .
G .
G allery,
I lkley:
S .
K erry;
o f S ussex A rchaeology,
D avison;
D avies;
M useum :
J .
D r.
A .
J .
A shmolean
M useum,
O xford:
I nskeep;
R .
F .
M useum :
C . L .
S .
F arnham M useum : M .
W atkins;
T he
F ield a nd G .
M acDonald; N .
W .
O xford :
A .
P rag; D r.
M ercer;
T hurrock L ocal J .
A rthur;
A .
J ewell; a nd
H inton;
B urleigh;
M useum
L ondon:
L ondon:
P .
K elly;
U niversity M useum,
O xford:
H .
J .
S .
M anchester
N ewbury D istrict M useum : S herratt;
G .
P hilo;
L uton M useum a nd A rt G allery:
A .
A rt
M .
B ritish M useum,
D .
P .
H istory
M anor H ouse M useum
M arsden;
P .
C lews;
D artford B orough M useum :
M useum a nd A rt G allery:
S aunders; W alrond;
a nd
G uildford M useum :
P .
L . B oyd;
C hertsey M useum :
V iner
G unnersbury P ark M useum,
M useum a nd A rt G allery: C . L . M oad; S affron W alden M useum : A lbans:
J ones a nd P .
K ingston-upon-Thames M useum :
L ewes:
D unlop;
M aidstone
A nthropology, C aterham :
H aslemere E ducational M useum :
L etchworth M useum a nd A rt G allery:
M useum o f L ondon:
a nd
D .
D .
R obinson;
B artlett;
H ertford
V arndell a nd D .
G allery
B irmingham
W iltshire A rchaeological a nd N atural
G loucester C ity M useum a nd A rt G allery: H istory M useum,
A rt
A llen;
M useum,
S aville;
C irencester:
C olchester a nd E ssex M useum : B oreham a nd C .
A .
M .
F arley a nd A .
B radford I ndustrial M useum :
a nd E ssex M useum :
M useum,
D .
A rchaeology S urrey
C heltenham A rt G allery a nd M useums:
M .
M useum a nd
B asingstoke:
M useum
C ra 'ster;
K etteringham ;
A ylesbury:
A .
H iggott;
P itt-Rivers
M useum,
P .
P owell;
R eading
C ram ; G uildhall M useum, R ochester: M . S . J ordain; V erulamium M useum, S t.
S tevenage M useum :
E .
P assmore E dwards M useum,
S t.
H ill D avies;
S tratford:
P .
S troud
W ilkinson;
S windon M useum a nd A rt G allery: S . J . W oodward; M unicipal M useum, T unbridge W ells: J . Vale; W atford M useum : H . P oole a nd D . S etford; W eybridge M useum : A . L ansdell; W indsor R oyal B orough C ollection: H unter; a nd O xfordshire C ounty M useum, W oodstock: J . R hodes. C ounty S .M.R. B edfordshire: E ssex: D . H ornbrook;
J .
O fficers: S .
C oleman;
B uckley; S urrey: D r.
B uckinghamshire:
M .
F arley a nd A .
P ike;
H ertfordshire: M . D aniels; O xfordshire: D . B ird; a nd W iltshire: R . C anham.
I
P rivate I ndividuals: R .
A inslie
C .
B arker
( Cumnor,
O xon.);
( Avebury a rea,
A .
C hambers ( Dorchester, O xon.); ( Waulud's B ank, B eds.); J . ( North S toke a rea, F arm,
B erks.);
O xon. F .
H enderson
J . G .
R .
( Dorney,
O xon.);
E .
V .
D r.
R .
( Rickmansworth J ones ( Mucking,
B ucks./Herts.);
M .
J . S .
G affney
B erks.);
H alpin
E ssex);
H ingley
R .
D yer F ord
( Maddle
C .
H ealey ( Mucking,
O xon.);
O xon.);
B ucks.);
L ondon); W ilts.);
B erks.);
F room ( Kennet V alley,
( Abingdon a rea,
V alley,
( Windrush V alley,
C arstairs
C otton ( West E vans ( Avebury,
a rea, O xon.); D r. R . J acobi m esolithic s ites i n g eneral); M . ( Colne
B roome P .
a nd T heale,
( Barrow H ills a nd B lewbury, a nd E .
J .
W ilts.);
R .
( Frilford
a rea, H erts. a nd E ssex); P . J ones
K eith-Lucas
( Kennet
V alley,
B erks.); G . L ambrick ( Mount F arm, G ravelly G uy a nd U pper T hames f loodplain s ites, O xon.); S . L obb ( Kennet V alley, B erks.); D . M iles ( Barton C ourt F arm, ( Runnymeade, ( Bagendon a rea, S mith
O xon.
B erks.);
a nd C laydon P ike, C .
G los.);
( Bagendon
W .
a rea,
B erks./Bucks.); ( Sussex W eald);
M . M .
O rton
D r.
L ondon);
D .
S tart
S tone ( Swindon a rea, T ingle ( Maddle F arm,
S .
W .
S kellington ( Abingdon a rea,
G los.);
( Waulud is B ank, B eds.); S . D . W eng ( Maidenhead a rea, B erks.). O f
G los.);
( Greater
N eedham S aunders
O xon.);
( Henley-on-Thames W ilts.); B erks.);
C . I .
T row ( Bagendon a rea,
F . J .
O xon.);
S .
a rea, T ebbutt T horpe a nd
t he m any p eople w ith w hom I h ave h ad f ruitful d iscussions,
R .
I
w ould p articularly l ike t o t hank t he f ollowing : B ritain: D r.
N .
B arton; H ingley;
P rof.
D r.
R .
M r.
D r. D r.
I . K innes; D r. N . J . S tarling;
J .
R .
B radley;
H odgson;
R . M ortimore; D r. G . W ait;
M r. D r.
J .
H .
J .
M .
C ase;
M r.
B .
C ranstone;
H owell;
D r.
R .
M .
M r. M . W . a nd D r. A .
P itts; D r. W hittle.
M .
J acobi;
R obinson;
F rance: A .
C hancerel a nd G . V erron.
T he N etherlands: D r.
J .
A .
B akker;
H .
F okkums;
M .
d e G rooth;
a nd P rof.
L .
P .
L ouwe
K ooijmans. W est G ermany: I .
C lausen;
D r.
J .
H oika;
a nd W .-D.
S teinmetz.
D enmark: N .
A ndersen;
H .
J uel J ensen;
T .
M adsen;
J .
S kaarup;
a nd D r.
H .
T hrane. I w ould a lso l ike t o t hank t hose p eople w ho h elped m e w ith s urvey w ork i n t he A vebury a nd A bingdon a reas:
J .
T homas;
R .
A inslie;
C .
H alpin;
J .
A rchaeological
W allis;
a nd n umerous m embers o f t he O xford
U niversity
S ociety a nd t he A bingdon A rchaeological a nd H istorical
S ociety. F inally, t ext,
I
w ould l ike t o t hank C hris C rickmore f or
t yping
t he
a nd m y p arents a nd V ivienne f or t heir u nfailing e ncouragement.
( iv)
N ote o n t he u se o f r adiocarbon d ates I t
h as
r ecently
b een s uggested t hat r adiocarbon
s hould b e e xpressed u sing t he n otation B .P., B .P.
a nd C al.
a ges
r espectively,
B .P.
s tudy
f ollowing t he l ate f or
( C-14)
B .P.,
B .C.
B .C.
a nd
A .D.
r efer
( Switsur 1 986,
t o
2 16).
h istorical
t he c onventions c ommonly u sed b y B ritish 1 970s a nd 1 980s
t his.
F irst, t hat
( e.g.
t he
R enfrew 1 974).
B ritish
y ears
p rehistorians
1 980-84
L aboratory ( numbers
b y
c alibration
l aboratories
b efore
t he
m id
1 980s
o f t hese d ates u sing t he n ewly a vailable
a nd
s econdly,
t here
a re
f ew s ites d iscussed f or w hich
s equence o f C -14 d ates h as b een p roduced ( cf. s ee C hapter 2 ). l argely
t he
h igh
c alibration c urves ( Pearson 1 987) h ave b een c arried c onsidered u nwise t o c alibrate t he d ates r eferred t o i n A nd
n ow e rror d ates
p roper
p recision
o ut, t his a
i t i s s tudy. r eliable
K innes a nd T horpe 1 986;
T he c hronological f ramework u sed t hroughout i s
b ased o n t he s equence o f n eolithic p ottery s tyles
1 974; s ee C hapter 2 ), t o C -14 d ates.
i n
b etween
a bout B M-1700 a nd B M-2315) a re i ncorrect, d ue t o a t echnical ( Tite e t a l. 1 987). U ntil a c ritical r eappraisal o f a ll C -14 p roduced
i n
b .c.,
T here a re t wo r easons
M useum R adiocarbon
C -14 d ates p roduced i n
o r
N evertheless,
a ll C -14 d ates a re e xpressed i n r adiocarbon
a cknowledges
d ates
a nd A .D.:
r epresent c onventional a nd c alibrated r adiocarbon w hile
c orrectly c alibrated C -14 d ates t his
C al.
( cf.
t hus S mith
o bviating t he n eed t o m ake f requent r eference
( v)
L ist o f F igures 2 .1
5 th
a nd
f rom
4 th
b asin
p lotted
a t
o ne
B ,
A , 2 ,
d ates
t he
T hames
d eviation.
( For
' plain
b owl'
p ottery:
H embury s tyle v essel;
D ecorated
' plain b owl'
5 ,
A bingdon s tyle v essel;
5
3 ,
9
p ottery;
W indmill H ill
s tyle
6 , Mildenhall s tyle v essel. C , P eterborough 7 , Ebbsfleet b owl; 8 , Mortlake b owl; 9 ,
v essel; W are;
F engate j ar. 2 .3
s tandard
u ndecorated v essel;
c arinated v essel.
4 ,
C -14
s ee T able 2 .1).
N eolithic p ottery s tyles. 1 ,
b .c.
a nd n eolithic s ites i n
f urther d etails, 2 .2
m illennia
m esolithic
D ,
G rooved W are v essel.
N eolithic a xes.
1 a nd 2 ,
t hick-butted g round a xes;
1 1
3 , ' Scandinavian' a xe. 2 .4
N eolithic a xes. a xe;
2 ,
1 ,
t hin-butted,
f laked
a nd g round
3 , thin-butted, edge-ground chisel;
s ides;
1 2
e longated t rapeze-shaped a xe w ith f acetted
4 , thin-
b utted c oncave-sided a xe. 3 .1
T he
a pproximate
T hames
p osition o f t he c oastline
e stuary:
A ,
a t
t he e nd o f t he
i n
t he
T hames
1 7
I I
t ransgression ( c. 3 500 b .c.); B , a t t he s tart o f t he T hames I II t ransgression ( c. 2 000 b .c.). After D evoy 1 980, 4 .1
1 36-7.
T he n ature a nd e ffect o f p ost- d epositional p rocesses
3 0
a cting o n t he l andscape: A , t he s ituation i n t he n eolithic p eriod; B , t he s ituation i n t he m id-20th c entury
b efore
a rchaeological
p loughing; r emains
C ,
b y
t he
d eep
t runcation
p loughing.
o f
A fter
T hrane 1 981. 5 .1
L ater
3 , 5 ,
m esolithic f lintwork:
1 -2,
b ladelet c ores;
t ranchet a xe-sharpening f lake; m icroburin; 7 -18, n arrow b lade
m icroliths. E arlier n eolithic d ebitage: 1 9-20, c ores; 2 1-22, c ore r ejuvenation f lakes. n eolithic d ebitage: 5 .2
N eolithic n otched
f lint
2 3-27,
6 -7
m icrodenticulates;
8 ,
1 1-12,
s crapers; o vate;
k nives;
1 3,
f abricator;
1 5,
g round-edged k nife;
a rrowhead;
1 7,
l ozenge-shaped a rrowhead;
o blique a rrowhead;
5 .3
1 -4,
p iercers;
a rrowhead;
T he
r ange
o f
1 9, 2 1,
b lade L ater
f lake c ores.
i mplements:
f lake;
t ranchet
3 9
4 ,
c ore t ablet; b urin; 6 ,
c hisel
1 6,
r od;
5 , 1 4,
l eaf-shaped 1 8,
p etit
a rrowhead;
2 0,
b arbed a nd t anged a rrowhead.
i mplements
i n
e arlier
a nd
n eolithic f lint a ssemblages i n s outhern B ritain.
l ater T he
y -axis r epresents t he n umber o f s ites a nd t he x -axis r epresents t he n umber o f d ifferent t ypes o f i mplement p resent a t e ach s ite.
4 0
9 -10,
T he n umbers i n t he b oxes r efer
t o s ites l isted i n T able 5 .1. ( vi)
4 9
6 .1
F ieldwork G roup
b y t he C otswold
A rchaeological
R esearch
7 2
a nd o ther w orkers i n t he n orth G loucestershire
C otswolds. 6 .2
F ieldwork i n s outh-east
G loucestershire,
i ncluding
7 3
t he a reas s urveyed b y C oombes a nd H ingley. 6 .3
F ieldwork
b y
B roome i n t he W indrush
w est o f W itney,
6 .4
t he
7 5
L ower H eyford,
7 6
v alley t o
O xon.
F ieldwork b y R eiss i n t he v icinity o f O xon.
6 .5
D istribution
o f a ll h umanly s truck f lint
f rom t he A bingdon a rea,
6 .6
D istribution
o f
O xon.
r ecovered
8 0
n eolithic
8 1
i n 1 982-83.
m esolithic a nd
e arlier
f lint r ecovered f rom t he A bingdon a rea, O xon. i n 1 982-83. G ravel t erraces a re o utlined w ith d ashed l ines a nd n umbered i n s equence. 6 .7
D istribution
o f f lint i mplements r ecovered f rom
A bingdon a rea,
6 .8
O xon.
t he
8 2
p roducing m ore t han
8 3
i n 1 982-83.
D istribution o f c ollection u nits
t he a verage n umber o f a ll h umanly s truck f lint i n t he A bingdon a rea, 6 .9
O xon.
L ocation o f m esolithic, a nd
e arlier
O xon.
A ,
H ills;
C orporation F arm ;
F ,
E state;
K ,
F ieldwork
D ,
B ,
B arton C ourt
S utton C ourtenay;
H ,
C ulham ;
e arlier a nd l ater
n eolithic
B ronze A ge s ites i n t he A bingdon
T hrupp S ite C ;
6 .10
i n 1 982-83.
T ithe
B arn
H urst H ill; b y
G ,
F ield; L ,
T hrupp S ite B ; F arm ;
E ,
8 4
a rea, C ,
B arrow
A shville T rading I ,
D rayton;
J ,
I ffley.
F ord i n t he v icinity o f
N orth
S toke,
8 5
a rea,
O xon.,
8 6
O xon. 6 .11
F ieldwork s howing o f
b y H ingley i n t he F rilford
t he e xtent a nd d ensity o f s urface
l ater
m esolithic,
e arlier n eolithic
f lintwork a nd
l ater
n eolithic d ate. 6 .12
F ieldwork
b y
t he
B uckinghamshire
C ounty
M useum
9 0
r ecovered
9 3
r ecovered f rom t he
9 4
A rchaeology G roup i n t he H addenham a rea, 6 .13
6 .14
6 .15
D istribution o f a ll h umanly-struck f lint f rom t he A vebury a rea, W ilts. i n 1 983. D istribution
o f f lint i mplements
A vebury a rea,
W ilts.
L ocation f lint w ith
B ucks.
i n 1 983.
o f t he m ajor f lint s catters
c ollectors i n t he e arly
2 0th
d iscovered c entury,
t he l ocation o f l ate m esolithic c amps a nd
e arlier
a nd
l ater
n eolithic
m onuments i n t he A vebury a rea,
d omestic W ilts.
s ites
b y
a long b oth a nd
9 5
6 .16
6 .17
F ieldwork b y t he B uckinghamshire C ounty M useum A rchaeology G roup i n t he v icinity o f G reat a nd L ittle M issenden,
B ucks.
F ieldwork
b y
V erulamium M useum i n t he
v icinity
1 00
o f
1 01
s ettlement a t
1 12
S t. A lbans. 6 .18
A lternative m odels o f l ater m esolithic W awcott I II,
6 .19
S tructural s urface
B erks. r emains r ecovered f rom t he
b eneath
t wo
G loucestershire C otswolds 6 .20
A ,
c hambered
b uried
c airns
( see G azetteer,
s ite;
B ,
a ccumulative
1 13
t he
T able 5 ).
t he p ossible d evelopment o f a n e arlier
d omestic
l and
i n
n eolithic
1 15
a rchaeological
r emains s urviving a fter e ach p hase o f s ettlement. 7 .1
U ngulate p opulation i n n eolithic s ites i n b asin, T he
n umbers
n umber
8 .1
t he T hames
1 22
e xpessed i n p ercentages o f d omestic u ngulates. i n t he r ight h and c olumn
o f b ones i dentified.
C ram 1 982;
M iles 1 986.
S ettlement
p atterns
i n
A fter
i ndicate G rigson
t he l ater
t he
1 982a;
m esolithic
n eolithic p eriods a cross a t ransect e xtending
a nd
1 30
n orth-
s outh f rom t he C otswolds t o t he K ennet v alley. 8 .2
S uggested
l ater
s ettlement
f orms
m esolithic
and
e arlier
a t t he h eadwaters o f
n eolithic
t he
1 33
K ennet,
W ilts. 9 .1
L ate
m esolithic a nd n eolithic c hronology
n orth-
1 41
s ettlement
1 48
o f
w est E urope. 9 .2
S ummary
o f l ate m esolithic a nd n eolithic
p atterns i n n orth-west E urope. 1 0.1
S ettlement
a nd e conomy i n t he T hames
b asin
i n
t he
1 52
d omestic
1 54
e arlier a nd l ater n eolithic p eriods. 1 0.2
S ketch s ites, t he
s howing
t he
n ature o f
n eolithic
w ith i ntensive h orticulture b eing p ractised i n
e arlier
n eolithic p eriod
a nd
i nfield-outfield
f arming i n t he l ater n eolithic p eriod. t he
T he f ields i n
l ater n eolithic p eriod w ould h ave b een
t o c ontrol t he m ovement o f a nimals.
e nclosed
L ist o f M aps 1
L ocation
m ap o f t he T hames b asin
n orth-west
E urope,
B ,
i n
A ,
r elation
i n r elation t o
t o
2 00
s outh-east
E ngland. 2
T he
T hames
b asin a nd m ajor t ributaries o f t he
L and o ver 1 22 m .
T hames.
2 01
i s s tippled.
3
L andscape r egions i n t he T hames b asin.
2 02
4
S implified s olid g eology.
2 03
5
M ain Q uaternary d eposits.
2 04
6
P alaeoenvironmental
s tudies
u ndertaken i n
b asin o n 5 th - 3 rd m illennia b .c.
t he
T hames
7
A rchaeological r econnaissance i n t he T hames b asin.
8
S ystematic s urface c ollection s urveys c oncerned w ith t he r ecovery
o f
2 06
d eposits.
p rehistoric f lintwork c arried o ut
2 07
i n
2 09
t he
T hames b asin.
9
L ater m esolithic s ites i n t he T hames b asin.
2 26
1 0
P ossible l ater m esolithic s ites i n t he T hames b asin.
2 29
1 1
E xcavated l ater
2 32
l ater
m esolithic s ites p roducing e vidence f or
n eolithic
t ask-specific a ctivity i n
t he
T hames
b asin. 1 2
D omestic
s ites
o f n eolithic d ate r epresented b y
f lint
2 44
D omestic s ites o f n eolithic d ate w ith s tructural r emains
2 46
s catters i n t he T hames b asin. 1 3
i n t he T hames b asin. 1 4
P ossible d omestic s ites o f n eolithic d ate i n t he
T hames
2 55
b asin. 1 5
P robable
t ask-specifib
s ites o f n eolithic d ate i n
t he
2 58
1 6
N eolithic p its a ssociated w ith t opsoil f lint s catters i n t he T hames b asin.
2 65
1 7
I solated p its o f n eolithic d ate i n t he T hames b asin.
2 76
1 8
I solated b asin.
2 80
1 9
N eolithic p ots
2 0
N eolithic b asin.
T hames b asin.
g roups
p ots
o f n eolithic m aterial
i n
t he
T hames
f rom t he T hames b asin. f rom
' watery'
c ontexts i n
2 82 t he
T hames
2 84
2 1
F lint a xe h oards i n t he T hames b asin.
2 86
2 2
T hick-butted g round a xes i n t he T hames b asin.
3 03
2 3
T hick-butted T hames b asin.
2 4
g round a xes f rom
L ater n eolithic,
' watery '
c ontexts i n
t he
3 11
t hin-butted a xes/chisels i n t he T hames
3 18
b asin. 2 5
L ater n eolithic, t hin-butted a xes/chisels f rom c ontexts i n t he T hames b asin.
2 6
F laked b asin.
f lint a xe p reforms a nd r oughouts i n
2 7
F laked
f lint
' watery'
3 22
T hames
3 25
' watery '
3 27
t he
a xe p reforms a nd r oughouts f rom
c ontexts i n t he T hames b asin.
3 29
2 8
J adeite a nd n ephrite a xes i n t he T hames b asin.
2 9
J adeite a nd n ephrite a xes f rom T hames b asin.
3 0
S candinavian a xes i n t he T hames b asin.
3 1
S candinavian b asin.
3 2
F lint m ines i n t he T hames b asin.
38
3
C ausewayed e nclosures i n t he T hames b asin.
3 43
3 4
C hambered c airns i n t he T hames b asin.
3 49
3 5
C hambered l ong b arrows i n t he T hames b asin.
3 53
3 6
E arthen l ong b arrows i n t he T hames b asin.
3 57
3 7
' Short'
a xes
f rom
l ong b arrows,
' watery'
' watery'
c ontexts i n
3 31
33
c ontexts i n t he
l ong m ortuary
t he
T hames
e nclosures,
o val
35
3 62
b arrows a nd b ank b arrows i n t he T hames b asin. 3 8
R ound b arrows a nd r ing-ditches i n t he T hames b asin.
3 67
3 9
C ursus m onuments i n t he T hames b asin.
3 71
4 0
H enge m onuments i n t he T hames b asin.
3 75
4 1
L ater m esolithic s ettlement i n t he T hames b asin.
3 76
4 2
E arlier n eolithic d omestic a ctivity i n t he T hames b asin.
3 77
4 3
E arlier n eolithic m onuments i n t he T hames b asin.
3 78
4 4
L ater n eolithic d omestic a ctivity i n t he T hames b asin.
3 79
4 5
L ater n eolithic m onuments i n t he T hames b asin.
3 80
( x )
4 6
V otive d eposits i n t he T hames b asin.
3 81
4 7
E arlier n eolithic p ottery s tyles i n t he T hames b asin.
3 82
4 8
L ater
m esolithic
s ettlement
i n t he U pper
T hames
a nd
3 83
T hames
3 84
K ennet c atchments. 4 9
E arlier n eolithic d omestic a ctivity i n t he U pper a nd K ennet c atchments.
5 0
E arlier
n eolithic
m onuments
i n t he U pper
T hames
a nd
3 85
T hames
3 86
L ater n eolithic m onuments i n t he U pper T hames a nd K ennet
3 87
K ennet c atchments. 5 1
L ater
n eolithic d omestic a ctivity i n t he
U pper
a nd K ennet c atchments. 5 2
c atchments
5 3
L ater
m esolithic
s ettlement
i n t he M iddle
a nd
L ower
3 88
a nd
3 89
L ower
3 90
a nd
3 91
L ater n eolithic m onuments i n t he M iddle a nd L ower T hames
3 92
T hames c atchments. 5 4
E arlier
n eolithic d omestic a ctivity i n t he
M iddle
L ower T hames c atchments.
5 5
E arlier
n eolithic
m onuments
i n t he M iddle
a nd
T hames c atchments. 5 6
L ater
n eolithic
d omestic a ctivity i n
t he
M iddle
L ower Thames c atchments.
5 7
c atchments.
L ist o f T ables 2 .1
5 th-3rd
m illennia b .c.
n eolithic c ontext, 4 .1
s ites
i n
C -14 d ates
f rom m esolithic
t he T hames b asin
( for
a nd
d etails
6
o f
s ee G azetteer).
P ost-depositional p rocesses a ffecting t he
d istribution,
2 9
p reservation a nd v isibility o f p ast m aterial r emains. 5 .1
S ites i n s outhern B ritain u sed f or t he a nalysis o f l ater
4 4
m esolithic a nd n eolithic f lint a ssemblages. 5 .2
T he i mplements p resent i n l ater m esolithic a nd n eolithic
5 2
f lint a ssemblages i n s outhern B ritain. 5 .3
C losed c ontexts f rom t he U pper a nd M iddle T hames v alley u sed i n t he s tudy o f l ater m esolithic a nd n eolithic
5 5
f lint t echnology. 5 .4
T echnological c haracteristics o f t he d ebitage f rom s ites l isted i n T able 5 .3.
5 .5
C losed
c ontexts f rom t he C otswolds a nd t he
D owns
u sed
i n
t he
s tudy
o f
l ater
t he
5 6
Marlborough
5 7
m esolithic
a nd
c haracteristics o f t he d ebitage f rom
t he
5 8
t ypological
6 2
n eolithic f lint t echnology. 5 .6
T echnological
s ites l isted i n T able 5 .5. 5 .7
S ummary o f r aw m aterial,
t echnological a nd
c haracteristics o f l ater m esolithic, a nd l ater n eolithic f lint a ssemblages. 1 0.1
S ummary
o f
n eolithic
s ettlement a nd
e arlier n eolithic
e conomy
i n
t he
1 51
T hames B asin.
T ables i n G azetteer 1
L ater m esolithic s ites
2 10
2
P ossible l ater m esolithic s ites
2 27
3
E xcavated
l ater m esolithic s ites p roducing
e vidence
f or
2 30
l ater n eolithic t ask-specific a ctivity 4
D omestic s ites o f n eolithic d ate
2 33
5
D omestic s ites o f n eolithic d ate w ith s tructural r emains
2 45
6
P ossible d omestic s ites o f n eolithic d ate
2 47
7
P ossible t ask-specific s ites o f d omestic d ate
2 56
8
N eolithic p its a ssociated w ith t opsoil f lint s catters
2 59
9
I solated p its o f n eolithic d ate
2 66
( xii)
1 0
I solated g roups o f n eolithic m aterial
2 77
1 1
N eolithic p ots
2 81
1 2
N eolithic p ots
1 3
F lint a xe h oards
2 85
1 4
T hick-butted,
g round a xes
2 87
1 5
T hick-butted,
g round a xes f rom
1 6
L ater n eolithic,
t hin-butted a xes/chisels
3 12
1 7
L ater n eolithic,
t hin-butted a xes/chisels
3 19
1 8
F laked f lint a xe p reforms a nd r oughouts
1 9
F laked
f rom
f lint
a xe
' watery'
c ontexts
' watery '
2 83
c ontexts
3 04
3 23
p reforms a nd r oughouts
f rom
' watery'
3 26
c ontexts 2 0
J adeite a nd n ephrite a xes
3 28
2 1
J adeite a nd n ephrite a xes f rom
2 2
S candinavian a xes
2 3
S candinavian a xes f rom
2 4
F lint m ines
3 36
2 5
C ausewayed e nclosures
39
2 6
C hambered c airns
2 44
2 7
C hambered l ong b arrows
3 50
2 8
E arthen l ong b arrows
3 54
2 9
' Short' l ong b arrows, l ong b arrows a nd b ank b arrows.
3 0
R ound b arrows a nd r ing-ditches
3 63
3 1
C ursus m onuments
3 68
3 2
H enge m onuments
3 72
' watery '
c ontexts
3 30 3 32
' watery '
c ontexts
m ortuary
3 34
e nclosures,
o val
3 58
P ART I :
B ACKGROUND A ND M ETHODOLOGY C hapter 1 .
T he
n eolithic
e laborate w ith
f or
i ts
f ield m onuments a ssociated w ith t he b urial o f t he d ead,
a nd
p ortable
n eolithic o f
p eriod
I ntroduction.
i n
B ritain
o bjects s uch a s p olished
i s
l argely
s tone
k nown
a xes.
C onsequently,
s tudies h ave m ainly b een c oncerned e ither w ith t he s equence
m onument
c onstruction
o r w ith t he d istribution
a nd
c ontext
o f
a rtefact d eposition ( Bradley 1 984a, 5 -6). I n h is c lassic s tudy o f n eolithic B ritain, P iggott ( 1954, 3 66) s tated t hat, " in t he e xtremely i ncomplete s tate o f o ur k nowledge i t i s a lmost i mpossible t o a ny
s ettlement
c ommunities".
" settlement
e nclosures
N eolithic
A m ore r ecent i nvestigation o f t he e arly d evelopment o f
n eolithic c ommunities i n s outhern E ngland b y W hittle t hat,
e stimate
u nit l ikely t o h ave b een c ommon t o B ritish
a nd
w as
w idespread,
b arrows s erving a s f oci f or a
n umerous p opulation" o f s ettlement,
( ibid.
t hough,
2 38).
( 1977)
i n g enerally s mall w idely
c oncluded
u nits,
w ith
s cattered
b ut
W hittle's a ccount o f t he c haracter
w as f ounded o n l imited e vidence a nd a mounts t o
l ittle m ore t han g uesswork. T he m issing s ettlement d ata f rom t he n eolithic p eriod a nd t he e arlier B ronze A ge i s s till " the l argest a rea o f
' blindness'
i n
B ritish p rehistory a nd d emands
c oncentration o f e ffort" T he
l ack
d omestic
i nformation
a ctivity
s ubstitute ( 1978,
o f
o n t he
n ature
t he
m ost
u rgent
3 1). a nd
d istribution
o f
i s o ften s ide-stepped b y u sing t he m onuments a s
f or e vidence o f s ettlement
3 9)
u ncommon,
( Groube a nd B owden 1 982,
s tated:
" it
( Bradley 1 984b,
6 1).
a
A s W hittle
i s t rue t hat a ctual s ettlement
s ites
a re
b ut t his i s a p roblem w hich b y a nd l arge p ersists i nto l ater
p rehistory
t oo.
I n
N eolithic
m ay
i ntended
p ermanence
d istributed
c ontext
o f
t he
c ausewayed
A nd R enfrew ( 1981,
t ombs
m onuments
f or t he i ncreasing
o f
t he
e arlier
e vidence
e nclosures,
a s f ar a s t he M idlands,
p opulation." c hambered
t his
b e b rought i n,
n ow
f or
s een
a lso i mplies a w ell
t o
b e
e stablished
8 0) w ent a s f ar a s t o s ay t hat
" offer u s a s c omprehensive a p attern
t he
o f
t he
s ettlement
d ata a s w e c an e xpect t o o btain f rom p rehistoric t imes." T he g eneral c onsensus i s t hat,
f aut d e m ieux,
n eolithic s tudies
c an b est b e a dvanced " if t he r ole o f t he d ead i s a llowed t o r etain i ts c entral p osition"
( Bradley 1 984c,
6 ).
H owever,
i f m onuments a re t o
c ontinue a s t he f ocus o f d iscussion, t heir r elationship t o ' living a reas' m ust b e a scertained f irst. T his s tudy i s t hus c oncerned w ith t he
r econstruction
i mmediately
p receding
o f
t he
p atterns
o f
s ettlement
a nd
a nd d uring t he n eolithic p eriod i n a
a rea o f s outhern B ritain:
e conomy s elected
t he c atchment o f t he R iver T hames a nd
i ts
t ributaries. T he
T hames
b asin w as c hosen a s t he a rea o f s tudy f or
r easons.
F irst,
i t
n eolithic
m aterial r emains a vailable
f or e xamination;
i n c omparison w ith o ther p arts o f s outhern E ngland, ( Renfrew 1 973), p attern'
t wo
c ontains a v ariety o f l andscape a nd a r ange
i t h as r eceived l ess a ttention.
m ain o f
a nd s econdly,
f or e xample W essex
T he t erm
' settlement
w ill b e u sed t o m ean " the m anner i n which a p eople's c ultural
a ctivities a nd s ocial i nstitutions a re d istributed o ver t he l andscape" ( Rouse 1 972, 9 6). T hus n ot o nly d omestic s ites, b ut a lso t asks pecific n etwork
s ites a nd c eremonial m onuments w ill b e o f
l oci
d iscussed,
a nd t he r ecord o f i ts a ctivities
1
a nd
a s
" the
i nstitutions
c omprise t he s ettlement p attern" h oped
t o
r econstruct
m onuments. s ite
A
t aken
i n
s itu
( although b y i ts
d ebris o f t his d ate
a s
1 972,
9 6).
I n t his w ay, d omestic
i t i s
s ites
a nd
n eolithic d omestic s ite i s d efined p ragmatically a s
p roducing
d omestic
( Rouse
t he r elationship b etween
n ature
( see C hapter 4 ),
o ften
w ith
a
d isturbed)
d omestic
r epresenting t he m aterial r emains o f l ocalized
d ebris
r esidential
a nd o ccupational a ctivities. T his f or
s tudy b egins w ith a s ummary o f t he c hronological
n eolithic
B ritain
p hysical
b ackground
( Chapter
3 ).
d ebitage
f ramework
f ollowed b y a n o utline
a nd n eolithic e nvironment o f
t he
o f
T hames
I t
p rocesses
o n
t he
n ature
o f
n eolithic
a nd
d omestic
i s a rgued t hat d ense s urface f lint s catters c ontaining
a nd a v ariety o f i mplements r ecovered f rom d isturbed
r epresent
t he b asin
C hapter 4 i nvestigates t he e ffect o f d epositional
p ost-depositional e vidence.
( Chapter 2 ),
n eolithic
d omestic s ites.
C hapter
5e xplores
g round
h ow
f lint
s catters c an b e a nalysed t o r econstruct n eolithic s ettlement p atterns, a nd
a lso
d iscusses t he e vidence a vailable f or s tudy
i n
t he
T hames
b asin. P art I I c onsists o f t wo c hapters w hich d escribe t he l ater m esolithic a nd n eolithic s ettlement p atterns a nd s ubsistence, r esource u se
a nd
e conomy
o f
t he
T hames
b asin,
i nformation o utlined i n C hapters 1 t o
u sing
t he
f ramework
a nd
5 .
P art I II i ncludes a d iscussive c hapter o n s ettlement p atterns a nd e conomy
i n
t he c ase s tudy a rea f rom 5 000 - 2 000 b .c.,
c omparative ( Chapter g azetteer
s tudies
f rom n eighbouring r egions i n
9 ),
a nd
a c oncluding c hapter ( Chapter
o f
a ll
s ites a nd a rtefacts d iscussed i n
g rouped t ogether a t t he e nd.
2
a c hapter
n orth-west 1 0). t his
M aps
o n
E urope a nd
s tudy
a a re
C hapter 2 . T he
B ackground t o t he i nquiry:
t ime
t he c hronological f ramework .
s cale c overed b y t his s tudy,
t he 5 th - 3 rd
m illennia
b .c., i ncludes t he e nd o f t he m esolithic p eriod a nd t he w hole o f t he n eolithic p eriod. U ntil r ecently, t hese p eriods w ere t reated a s s eparate
e ntities:
t he f irst,
c haracterized b y b ladelet i ndustries
a nd m icroliths, r epresented e arly p ost-Glacial h unter-gathering g roups; t he s econd, i dentified b y g round s tone a xes, r ound-based p ottery
a nd m egalithic m onuments,
w as a ssociated w ith t he a rrival o f
t he f irst f armers f rom t he C ontinent . b y P rofessors J .
G .
D .
C lark a nd S .
T hus t he f irst m ajor
a ccounts
p roduced i n t he m id 2 0th c entury
o f m esolithic a nd n eolithic B ritain,
P iggott r espectively,
c oncentrated
m esolithic
( 1932)
o n e ach p eriod i n i solation. C lark's
p ioneer
s tudy
o f
B ritain
w as
e ssentially a n e xamination o f t he m icrolithic f lint i ndustries o f t his p eriod.
M ost
g round
a nd
o f
t hese i ndustries w ere f ound o n t he s urface o f
r arely i n a s tratigraphical c ontext, r econstructing a c hronological
t hus
s equence
t he
l imiting
o f
t he
s cope
f or
C lark
a voided t his p roblem b y u sing t he c ultural s equence o utlined b y
d evelopment.
c ontinental s cholars a s a b asis f or c lassifying t hese i ndustries.
I n
t erms
t o
o f
a bsolute
c hronology,
h e d ated t he
m esolithic
b etween t he l ate 7 th - l ate 3 rd m illennia b .c. c lassic
s tudy
d ivided
t he
o f t he a rtefacts a nd m onuments o f p eriod i nto t wo c omponents:
W indmill H ill C ulture, P eterborough o btained b .c.
P iggott
a nd
( 1954),
n eolithic
t he p rimary
i n h is
B ritain,
n eolithic
o r
a nd t he s econdary n eolithic a ssociated w ith t he
o ther c ultures.
b y t his t ime,
A lthough t wo C -14 d ates h ad
h e c hose t o d iscount t he d ate o f 3 014
b een +
3 00
( C-462)
f rom E henside T arn i n t he L ake D istrict a s b eing f ar t oo
a nd
f itted t he p rimary a nd s econdary n eolithic p eriods i nto a
e arly,
5 00 y ear t imespan, T he
b eginning a t 2 000 b .c.
p rovision
o f
a bsolute
( Piggott 1 954,
d ates
b y
m esolithic s ites
p eriod,
3 80).
r adiocarbon
r evolutionized t he s tudy o f p rehistory ( Renfrew 1 974,
d ating
3 0).
F or
t he
f urther s tudy o f t he m icrolithic i ndustries
f rom
w ith a ssociated C -14 d ates l ed t o t he d efinition o f t wo p hases:
t he e arlier m esolithic p eriod c . a
p eriod
r estricted
m esolithic p eriod,
C .
6 500 - c .
n arrow,
g eometric m iCroliths
p eriod,
t he
P iggott's
8 300 - c .
6 500 b .c.,
c haracterized b y
r ange o f b road-blade m icrö lith f orms;
a ccumulation
( 1954)
p eriod b ack t o c .
s tudy
o f
3 500 b .c.,
( Jacobi 1 973,
2 37-8).
C -14 d ates s ince
h as p ushed t he t imespan
3 200 - C .
2 000 b .c.
a nd
t he
l ater
r epresented b y a r ange o f F or t he n eolithic
t he
p ublication
f or
t he
( Clark 1 965).
o f
n eolithic
S mith's
( 1956)
e xhaustive s tudy o f n eolithic p ottery a nd t he s tratigraphic r elationship b etween d ifferent s tyles o f p ottery a nd t he s equence o f m onument
c onstruction
c onfirmed
P iggott's
t wo-fold
d ivision
o f
n eolithic m aterial r emains i n B ritain i nto a n e arlier a nd a l ater p hase, w ith t he s eparation o f t he t wo d ated t o a round t he s econd q uarter o f t he 3 rd m illennium b .c.
( Smith 1 974a,
1 00).
T he e arlier m esolithic f lint a nd b one a ssemblages i n B ritain h ave a ffinities w ith t heir e arly m esolithic c ounterparts,
p articularly t he
M aglemosian C ulture, i n o ther p arts o f n orth-west E urope ( Jacobi 1 973, 2 39). T he l ater m esolithic p eriod, t hough, r epresents a n i nsular d evelopment t he i nto
r esulting f rom t he s eparation o f t he B ritish
I sles
c ontinent a nd t he t ransformation o f t he B oreal b irch-pine t he A tlantic c limax d eciduous
f orest
3
( Jacobi 1 973,
2 46 ;
f rom f orest
1 976,
7 8-80). T here
T he a re
e nd o f t he m esolithic p eriod i s d ifficult
e arly
4 th
m illennium
b .c.
C -14
m esolithic d eposits i n s outhern B ritain, ( lab.
n o.
n ot q uoted)
d ates
f or e xample
f or t he W awcott X XIII s ite,
t o
d efine.
a vailable 3 910 + 1 13
B erks.
( R.
M .
f or b .c.
J acobi
c ard i ndex), 3 780 + 1 50 b .c. ( BM-91) a nd 3 710 + 1 50 b .c. ( BM-40) r ock s helter o ccupation a t H igh R ocks, E ast S ussex ( Burleigh e t
f or a l.
1 976, 1 6-17; M oney 1 960) a nd 3 700 + 1 49 b .c. ( BM-1257) a nd 3 475 + 1 50 b .c. ( BM-1258) f or a m idden d eposit a t 1B lashenwell, D orset ( Burleigh a nd M atthews
1 982,
1 54-5;
P reece
1 980),
b eyond t he m id 4 th m illennium b .c. a
b ut t hese
d o
n ot
e xtend
I t h as b een a rgued t hat t here w as
c essation i n t he d evelopment o f m icrolith t echnology b y
4 000
b .c.
( Jacobi a nd T ebbutt 1 981, 2 9), b ut t his c ould b e e xplained b y t he s hortage o f e arly 4 th m illennium b .c. f lint a ssemblages a vailable f or s tudy.
T he
l oss
o f s tretches o f t he
m esolithic
c oastline
a round
s outh-east
E ngland h as o ften b een c ited t o e xplain t he p aucity o f 4 th
m illennium
b .c.
m esolithic s ites i n c omparison w ith t hose
f rom t he Y orkshire P ennines a nd c oastal l ocations e astern I reland ( Bradley 1 984c, 9 -10).
i n
r ecovered
S cotland
a nd
A s w ith t he t erminal s tages o f t he m esolithic p eriod i n s outhern B ritain, t here a re d ifficulties i n d efining t he s tart o f t he n eolithic p eriod.
W hile
s ites,
f or
b arrow,
B erks.
t here a re s ingle p re-3200 b .c.
e xample 3 415 + 1 80 b .c. ( Wymer 1 970),
C -14 d ates f rom
( GX-1174)
s ome
f rom t he L ambourn l ong
t he e arliest s equence o f C -14 d ates f or a
d iscrete n eolithic c ontext,
t he S weet T rack i n2t he
S omerset
L evels,
c entre o n 3 200 b .c. ( Coles a nd C oles 1 975 , 5 4). T his l eaves a g ap o f C . 5 00 r adiocarbon y ears b etween t he l atest m esolithic s ites a nd t he e arliest n eolithic s ites p resently k nown i n s outhern E ngland, a lthough i n I reland t here a re p re-3500 b .c. C -14 d ates f rom e arlier n eolithic c ontexts,
f or e xample a t B allynagilly,
( 1969a ,
C ase
7 ;
1 969b ,
1 85)
C o.
T yrone
( ApSimon 1 976,
p roposed a n e arly n eolithic p hase
2 0). o f
' pioneer f arming' t o f ill t he g ap i n t he s outhern B ritish s equence, w hen t he i ndigenous m esolithic p opulation a dopted f arming f rom c ontinental i mmigrants. B y t he e arly 3 rd p ioneer f armers h ad r eached a p hase o f m anifested b y t he c onstruction p roduction o f p ottery ( Case 1 969b,
m illennium b .c., t hese ' stable a djustment', a s
o f c eremonial m onuments 1 83). C ase ( 1969a, 7 -8;
a nd 1 986,
t hus p roposed a t ripartite s cheme f or t he n eolithic p eriod: ( pioneer f arming s tarting i n t he e arly 4 th m illennium b .c.); ( the
s table
b .c.);
a djustment f rom t he s econd h alf o f
a nd l ate p hase
C ase's
9 -15),
( 1983)
a nd t o
f or e arly t o m id-4th m illennium b .c. F or t he p urposes o f t his s tudy,
T he
n eolithic o ccupation i s l acking.
c ontexts:
3
t he t wo-fold d ivision o f t he n eolithic ( 1974)
( 1980) w ill b e f ollowed.
e arlier
r epresented
n eolithic
p eriod,
b y m onuments c ontaining c ausewayed
( Smith 1 974, t radition
d ecorative t raits r egional
d irect a rchaeological e vidence
i nto a n e arlier a nd a l ater p hase a s o utlined b y S mith
a nd W hittle
p ottery
m illennium
b ut r egardless o f w hether i t i s n ecessary
p ostulate a p hase o f p ioneer f arming,
b arrows
4 th
a n e arly m iddle
( the l ate 3 rd m illennium b .c.).
s cheme h as r ecently b een q uestioned b y D ennell
B radley ( 1984c,
p eriod
t he
t he 1 9)
e nclosures, 1 07;
F ig.
c ontains ( Fig.
d istributions
a
2 .2: ( Smith
C .
3 200
- C .
' plain b owl'
2 700
p ottery
s eries o f n os. 1 974,
1 -6), 1 08;
s tyles,
T he s ome
w ith c learly W hittle
i s
p rimary
c hambered t ombs a nd e arthen
2 .1 a nd T able 2 .1).
-4
b .c., i n
l ong
' plain b owl' d efined
b y
d iscernible
1 977,
8 5-94).
c o i u A .
e
0
I i . z
S . , ? r
0 0 . I
e 0
e . 0
i v 2 ) r xA . e
DATE
( L c . )
4 500
g ie e z
L i /
e
x -
C )
,
. e 0
o i x , e
C S
i e
e c r
c s E ! n c -
0 e
r i v
/ .
o
. . ,
0
C I
e e
A: e i
C O
i v , . . 2e
i t e
4 . : : i
A s
0 0 i d ' e
e
c y , . A . i
0
0
e c -
e o
s . i k
r e o , c 1 )
c o e z
4 .
Z A . • : , c u eL i j Z i e z z e zc r o ek u i
0 ' 2'• • 1 Z i l l
c r
0 DATE c t "ez ( b. . 3 c . ) 0 2 0 4 500
o
C
4 000
4 000 _
3 500
3 500
3 000
3 000 _
2 500 _
2 500 _
2 000 _
I1 _ 20 00
P ETERBOROUGH WARE
' PLA IN BO WL ' POTTERY
F igure 2 .1
GROOVED WARE
5 th a nd 4 th m illennia b .c. C -14 d ates f rom m esolithic a nd n eolithic s ites i n t he T hames b asin p lotted a t o ne s tandard 2 .1).
d eviation.
( For f urther d etails,
1 -5 -
s ee T able
T able
2 .1
5 th - 3 rd m illennia b .c.
n eolithic
s ites
i n t he T hames b asin
C -14 d ates ( for
f rom m esolithic a nd
d etails
o f
c ontext,
s ee
G azetteer). M esolithic s ites T olpits L ane S ite B ,
M oor P ark,
H erts.
W awcott I II, B erks. W awcott X XIII, B erks.
4 380 + 8 0 b .c. ( Q-1099) 4 170 7134 b .c. ( BM-767) 3 910 ± 1 13 b .c. ( Lab.
n o.
n ot q uoted)
C ausewayed e nclosures A bingdon,
O xon.
W indmill H ill,
E ton W ick,
W ilts.
B erks.
4 070 + 1 10 b .c.
( BM-349)
3 110 7 130 b .c.
( BM-351)
3 020
( BM-353) ( BM-350)
2 780
b .c.
( BM-348)
2 760 7135 b .c.
( BM-352)
2 510 7 140 b .c.
( BM-355)
2 500 7 145 b .c.
( BM-354)
O rsett,
71 35
* 2960 + 1 50 b .c. 2 580 + 1 50 b .c.
( BM-73) ( BM-74)
2 800 + 8 0 b .c.
( BM-2533)
2 730 7110 b .c. 2 730
K nap H ill,
1 30 b .c.
2 960 7 110 b .c.
W ilts.
5 0 b .c.
2 760 + 1 15 b .c.
( BM-2434) ( BM-2435) ( BM-205)
2 791 + 1 13 b .c. ( BM-1213) 2 776 7 -7 4 b .c. ( BM-1378)
E ssex
2 635 2 583
7 - 82 b .c. ( BM-1215) 71 12 b .c. ( BM-1214)
C hambered c airns H azleton I I,
G los.
-6
3 150 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-910)
* 3020 + 8 0 b .c.
( OxA-738)
3 020 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-914)
3 020 + 6 0 b .c. 3 010 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-907) ( OxA-913)
3 000 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-905)
* 2965 + 8 0 b .c.
( OxA-739)
2 930 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-906)
2 910 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-904)
2 890 + 8 0 b .c.
( OxA-644)
2 890 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-915)
2 890 + 6 0 b .c.
( OxA-903)
2 880 + 8 0 b .c.
( OxA-911)
2 880 + 6 0 b .c.
( OxA-908)
2 860 + 7 0 b .c.
( OxA-916)
2 830 + 8 0 b .c.
( OxA-645)
* 2825 + 8 0 b .c.
( OxA-646)
2 810 + 6 0 b .c.
( OxA-643/902)
2 606 + 6 0 b .c.
( OxA-1177/383)
C hambered c airns
( contd.) 3 248 3 070 2 992 2 943 * 2785
A scott-under-Wychwood, O xon.
+ + + + +
2 25 b .c. 9 2 b .c. 7 4 b .c. 7 0 b .c. 7 0 b .c.
( BM-835) ( BM-833) ( BM-832) ( BM-491b) ( BM-492)
2 764 + 1 66 b .c. ( BM-837) 2 495 + 6 1 b .c. ( BM-836) C hambered l ong b arrows W est K ennet,
W ilts
W ayland's S mithy,
2 875 + 8 0 b .c.
( OxA-449)
2 830 7• 90 b .c. 2 830 7• 90 b .c. 2 750 7• 80 b .c.
( OxA-451) ( OxA-563) ( OxA-450)
* 2820 + 1 30 b .c.
B erks.
( 1-1468)
E arthen l ong b arrows L ambourn,
3 415 + 1 80 b .c.
B erks.
( Gx-1178)
O ther e arlier n eolithic s ites C annon H ill,
M aidenhead,
R unnymede,
B erks.
E bbsfleet,
K ent
3 320 + 1 10 b .c.
B erks.
2 980 2 970 2 880 2 740 2 680
2 710 + 1 15 b .c. 2 630 + 8 0 b .c.
H emp K noll, W ilts. ' Short' H orslip,
l ong b arrows,
+ 7 0 b .c. 7 80 b .c. 7 70 b .c. 7• 11 0 b .c. 7- 7 0 b .c.
( HAR-1198) ( HAR-6131) ( HAR-6128) ( HAR-6130) ( HAR-6133) ( HAR-6132) ( BM-113) ( HAR-2997)
b ank b arrows a nd o val b arrows
W ilts.
3 240 + 1 50 b .c.
( BM-180)
B eckhampton R oad, W ilts.
* 3250 + 1 60 b .c. ( NPL-138) 2 517 •90 b .c. ( BM-506b) 2 307 •90 b .c. ( BM-506a)
S outh S treet, W ilts.
* 2810 + 1 30 b .c.
( BM-356)
2 750 71 • 3 5 b .c.
( BM-357)
2 670 + 1 40 b .c. 2 580 71 • 1 0 b .c.
( BM-358a) ( BM-358b)
N orth S toke, B arrow H ills,
O xon. R adley,
O xon.
2 722 + 4 9 b .c.
( BM-1405)
2 550 + 6 0 b .c.
( BM-2392)
2 470 7 70 b .c. ( BM-2393) 2 380 •80 b .c. ( BM-2391) 2 370 7• 13 0 b .c. ( BM-2390)
7
R ing d itches a nd r ound b arrows M ount F arm,
B erinsfield,
S ilbury H ill,
2 500 + 1 00 b .c.
O xon.
W ilts.
2 725 + 1 10 b .c.
( SI-910-A)
2 620 + 1 20 b .c.
( 5I-910-C)
2 580 + 1 10 b .c.
( SI-910-D)
2 515 + 1 30 b .c.
( SI-910-C-H)
2 365 + 1 10 b .c. 2 145 + 9 5 b .c. D orchester X I,
O xon.
( HAR-4673)
( SI-910-B) ( 1-4136)
2 370 + 9 0 b .c.
( BM-2440)
2 370 + 5 0 b .c.
( BM-24 ) 42)
C ursus m onuments D orchester,
2 560 + 1 00 b .c.
O xon.
( BM-2443)
H enge m onuments T he D evil's Q uoits,
S tanton H arcourt,
2 060 + 1 20 b .c.
( HAR-1887)
O xon. O ther l ater n eolithic s ites
B arton C ourt F arm,
A bingdon,
* indicates
o btained f rom material a ssociated w ith b uried
d ates
O xon.
2 080 + 7 0 b .c. 1 960 ; 70 b .c.
( HAR 2387) ( HAR 2388)
l and
s urfaces B ritish M useum C -14 d ates
f alling w ithin l ab.
2 315 h ave n ot b een i ncluded ( see T ite e t a l.
-8
n umbers B M-1700 a nd B M1 987).
0
0
0
0
0
W eV 4 W 1‘%%‘‘‘O.M
O . eCecccoo CC C GC cc CCC OCe 000 0000 • occoce CC O C OC CO
› .)
r
e
i\ \ , b
o p - „g t
0 ö : O o
o t
6 0 0 ,0 0 o o b o b
0
4 1 0
6 0 , 0i n
# o
1
0
0.
a t 0 , o 0 d z
0, 1 0 0 "
0 0 o t
" 4
AA
e #
b
o b
0
5 cm
EI = ECZ IM I
F igure 2 .2
N eolithic p ottery s tyles.
A ,
' plain b owl'
p ottery:
1 ,
u ndecorated v essel; 2 , H embury s tyle v essel; 3 , carinated v essel. B , D ecorated ' plain b owl' p ottery: 4 , Abingdon s tyle v essel; 5 , W indmill H ill s tyle v essel; 6 , M ildenhall s tyle v essel. C , P eterborough W are: 7 , E bbsfleet b owl; 8 , M ortlake b owl; 9 , F engate j ar. D , G rooved W are v essel.
9
A ssociated
C -14 d ates s how t hat t hese s tyles o verlap c hronologically,
a nd l ast f rom c .
3 000 - c . o f
2 600 b .c.
( Smith
1 974,
n eolithic
p ottery
s econdary
c ontexts a t e arlier n eolithic m onuments,
K ennet l ong b arrow ( Piggott 1 962, 1 1),
b oth i n W iltshire, a
1 06-8).
t he P eterborough W are t radition c an 2 8-9)
L ater
o ccur
f or e xample
a nd W indmill H ill
i n W est
( Smith 1 965,
d emonstrating t hat s ome f orm o f a ctivity t ook
p lace
a t
F lint
a nd o ther s tone a xes f ound i n e arlier n eolithic c losed c ontexts
f ew o f t hese m onuments i n t he
l ater
n eolithic
p eriod.
a re g round a ll o ver a nd h ave t hick b utts ( M. W . P itts p ers. c omm.; F ig. 2 .3: n os. 1 a nd 2 ). L eaf-shaped a rrowheads a nd b lade-dominant f lint
i ndustries c haracterize t his p eriod ( Smith 1 974,
1 05);
t hese
a re d iscussed f urther i n C hapter 5 . T he l ater n eolithic p eriod, t he
d evelopment
c onstruction b arrows, d ating
o f
o f
c .
P eterborough
2 700 - c . W are
b arrows
a ssociated a rtefacts,
a nd
b etween c .
1 974,
a n ew r ange o f m onuments i ncluding
c ursus m onuments a nd h enges. a nd
2 000 b .c.,
( Smith
o ther
f orms o f
2 700 - C .
o val
' short'
b arrows/ring-ditches
2 300 b .c . . ( Fig.
a nd a nd
t he r ound
O n t he e vidence o f r adiocarbon
a n umber o f
w ith e arlier n eolithic m onuments,
i s d efined b y 1 11)
e arthen
l ong
w ere
c onstructed
2 .1 a nd T able 2 .1).
I n c ontrast
t hese b arrows w ere e ither d evoid o f
h uman b urials, f or e xample B eckhampton R oad a nd S outh S treet ' short' l ong b arrows, b oth i n W iltshire ( Ashbee e t a l. 1 979) a nd t he N orth S toke B ank b arrow,
O xon.
a dult i nhumations, ( Bradley e t a l. b e
( Case 1 982c,
1 984).
T horpe
a ppropriate t o u se t he t erm
l ate
b arrows,
7 2-4),
a lthough
( 1984,
5 7)
c ursus
m onuments
c ontexts,
' middle n eolithic'
h enge
m onuments
f or t hese a nd o ther f or
t his
O xon.
W are
f rom
( Thomas a nd W allis
h ave p roduced P eterborough W are,
W ilts.
( Smith
1 965a,
2 24-6).
G rooved
w hile
W are
a nd
f or e xample
I n a t l east t wo i nstances,
h enge
m onuments w ere s uperimposed o n c ursus
M axey,
C ambs.
( Pryor a nd F rench 1 985,
p rimary
1 982),
B eaker p ottery f rom e ither p rimary o r s econdary c ontexts, A vebury,
r est
R ecent e xcavations a t a n umber
h ave p roduced P eterborough
f or e xample D rayton,
R adley, O xon.
h as s uggested t hat i t m ight
h is c hronological a rguments
r ather t enuously o n C -14 d ates a lone. o f
o r c ontained a rticulated
f or e xample B arrow H ills o val b arrow,
m onuments,
2 38);
f or
e xample
t hus i n s ome c ases c ursus
m onuments d efinitely p re-date h enges. T he e arliest o f t he P eterborough W are c eramic W are
( Fig.
p ottery H ill,
2 .2:
a t
7 ),
( Smith
i 965a,
5 7).
o f
b een
t he
e arlier n eolithic p eriod
d eveloping b efore t he
t hroughout
( Smith 1 974,
s eries
a re M ortlake b owls a nd F engate j ars
m illennium
b .c.
P eterborough o f
1 12).
8 and 9 ).
n os.
p eriod
( Fig.
c entral
i s
d ramatic
( Smith
1 974,
2 .2:
D ),
o verlapping
i n
W are a nd e arly B eaker p ottery ( Smith
f ound i n l ater n eolithic c ontexts,
3 a nd
4 ).
c hange i
1 12;
G rooved W are a ppears a t t he e nd o f d ate 1 974, e arlier
F ig.
t he
3 rd
w ith
b oth
1 20).
T he
n eolithic
a s a re a r ange o f t hin-
t he m ajority o f w hich a re f laked a ll o ver b ut
o nly g round a t t he c utting e dge 1 ,
s outhern,
P eterborough
T he t wo o ther s tyles i n t he P eterborough
f lint a xe w ith a t hick b utt f ound i n t he
b utted a xes a nd c hisels, n os.
t hat
W are f irst a ppeared i n t he L ower T hames v alley a s a v ariant
s eries
f orm
W indmill
s uggested
s outh-east a nd e astern B ritain a s a c eramic s tyle i n t he
2 .2:
E bbsfleet
' plain b owl'
f or e xample
I t h as
o f t he e arlier n eolithic r egional s tyle s eries, e nd
s tyles,
i s f ound i n a ssociation w ith
a n umber o f c ausewayed e nclosures,
W iltshire
E bbsfleet
n o.
( M.
W .
P itts,
p ers.
T he l ater n eolithic p eriod
f lint t echnology,
c omm.; a lso
F ig.
r esulting i n t he p roduction
- 1 0 -
2 .4:
w itnessed
a o f
2
5 cm
F igure 2 .3
N eolithic
a xes.
' Scandinavian'
1 a nd 2 , a xe.
t hick-butted g round a xes;
3 ,
CD
' C.
0 F igure
2 .4
N eolithic a xes. 2 ,
1 ,
o
5 cm
1 --4
t hin-butted,
1 --1 1
I --4
f laked a nd g round a xe;
e longated t rapeze-shaped a xe w ith f acetted s ides;
t hin-butted,
e dge-ground
c oncave-sided a xe.
- 1 2
-
c hisel;
4 ,
3 ,
t hin-butted.
f lake-dominant
a ssemblages
l eaf-shaped a rrowheads T he
t wo-fold
a nd
t he s ubstitution o f
( Smith 1 974,
c hronological
1 20;
t ransverse
f or
s ee C hapter 5 ).
d ivision o f
t he
n eolithic
p eriod
o utlined a bove, w hich i s b ased l argely o n t he s equence o f p ottery s tyles a nd m onument c onstruction, a ccords w ell w ith t he c hronological s cheme f or f lintwork w ill t he
b e
( see C hapter 5 ).
T he c hronological s equence t hat
u sed a s t he b asis f or t his s tudy c onsists o f
l ater m esolithic p eriod,
c .
n eolithic p eriod, c . 3 200 - c . p eriod, c . 2 700 - C . 2 000 b .c.
5 000 - c .
t hree
3 200 b .c.;
2 700 b .c.;
p hases:
t he e arlier
a nd t he l ater n eolithic
F ootnotes 1 .
d ate o f 3 310 + 1 30 b .c.
T he
( BM-449)
l ayers o f a l arge, — c ircular f eature
f or a h earth i n t he
u pper
( which c ould b e a t ree h ole)
c ontaining a l ater m esolithic f lint i ndustry a t W awcott I , ( Froom 1 972b, 4 2) h as b een d iscredited ( Jacobi 1 982, 2 1). 2 .
B erks.
C -14 d ates o btained f rom w ood s amples t aken f rom t he S weet T rack, a
w ooden
' catwalk'
a ssociation
w ith
s tructure p reserved i n p eat
e arlier
n eolithic
' plain
a nd
b owl'
i n
d irect
p ottery
a nd
f lintwork, a re 3 274 + 7 5 b .c. ( Q-968), 3 268 + 7 5 b .c. ( Q-963), 3 209 + 7 0 b .c. ( Q-966), 3 200 + 6 5 b .c. ( Q-962) , — 3 190 + 1 00 b .c. ( Q-113. 2 ),
3 158 + 6 5 b .c.
2 937 + 9 0 b .c. C -14
S ingle
(7 4 i -991)
( Q19 67),
3 153 + 1 00 b .c.
( Coles a nd C oles
( Q7 1 103)
d ates c annot b e u sed o n t heir o wn t o d ate a
p hase o f a ctivity: n eolithic p eriod
a nd
5 4).
1 97 5,
s ingle
' one d ate i s n o d ate'. T hus t he s tart o f t he c annot b e d efined r eliably u sing s ites w ith
s ingle d eterminations.
H owever,
e ven s ites w hich h ave p roduced a
s eries o f d ates c annot b e c redited a utomatically: t he d ated m aterial, c ontext a nd w hat t his r epresents i n t erms o f a ctivity o n
t he
s ite m ust b e e xamined c ritically
v alidity o f a ny s equence o f C -14 d ates. c ausewayed e nclosure, u pper
d itch
O xon.
b efore
a ccepting
F or e xample,
t he
a t A bingdon
o ne l ayer t owards t he b ottom o f t he
f ills i n a rea C p roduced a c harcoal s ample
a nd
a n
a nimal b one s ample t hat g ave C -14 d ates o f 3 110 + 1 30 b .c. ( BM3 51) a nd 2 760 + 1 35 b .c. ( BM-352) r espectively. I n a ddition, i n a rea
B
a d ate o f 2 780 + 1 35 b .c.
c harcoal d ate
( BM-348)
w as
o btained
f rom
f rom t he b ottom l ayer i n t he u pper d itch l evels,
o f 4 070 + 1 10 b .c.
( BM-349)
a nd a
c ame f rom c harcoal f ound i n
a
l ayer
s tratified s everal l ayers a bove t he c ontext f rom w hich t he
f irst
d ate w as o btained ( Avery 1 982,
w as
s ome
t he d ate o f 4 070 _ + 1 10 c ould r elate t o t his p hase o f a ctivity.
b .c.
m esolithic ( BM-349) C learly,
f lintwork
4 9).
A s t here
o n t he s ite,
d ates o btained f rom s mall f ragments o f c harcoal m ust b e
t reated w ith c aution,
a s c harcoal c ould h ave s urvived o n a
s ite
f or s everal c enturies b efore i t f inally b ecame i ncorporated i n a n a rchaeological
c ontext.
d ates f rom B riar H ill, c omminuted
c harcoal,
H ence
t he e arly 4 th
N orthants., c annot
c onstruction o f t he e nclosure:
b e
m illennium
a ccepted
a s
d ating
t hey d erive f rom f eatures
a lso p roduced 3 rd m illennium b .c.
d ates
( Kinnes a nd T horpe
S ome l ater m esolithic f lintwork w as f ound a t t he s ite, r elate t o a ctivity h ere i n t he e arly 4 th m illennium b .c.
- 1 3 -
b .c.
w hich w ere a ll o btained f rom t he w hich 1 986).
a nd c ould
3 .
I t
c ould
b e
a rgued
t hat
c hanges
i n
s ubsistence
a ssociated
w ith
a
l ikely
h ave
r esulted i n t he p roduction
t o
d isplay
g reater
a ssemblages
t han
h ypothetical p hase o f a ffinities
r emaining f rom a p re-3200 b .c. b e
c onflated
m aterial.
w ith
l ater m esolithic
p ioneer
e arlier
o f
p ractices
f arming
t oolkits n eolithic
a ssemblages.
A ny
a re w hich f lint
m aterial
p hase o f f arming i s t hus l ikely t o
w ith e arlier n eolithic
( i.e.
3 200
- 2 700
b .c.)
C hapter 3 .
P hysical b ackground a nd e nvironment o f t he T hames b asin.
T he t he
r egion i n s outhern B ritain s elected a s a c ase s tudy a rea
T hames b asin
t ributaries t ypes, a nd
( Map
2 ).
t he c atchment a rea o f t he T hames a nd
T his u nit e ncompasses a v ariety o f
i s i ts
l andscape
s tretching f rom t he o olite l imestone d ipslope o f t he C otswolds
c halk
d ownland a t t he h eadwaters o f t he K ennet
b rickearth M ost
( Map 1 ):
p lains
t o
t he
o f s outh-west E ssex a nd n orth-west K ent
c oastal ( Map
3 ).
p arts o f t he T hames b asin p rovide s uitable l and f or a griculture:
r easonably w ell-drained s oils c ontaining a g ood s upply o f n utrients i n a
r egion
w here
t he
c limate i s
f avourable
t o
a rable
f arming
a nd
l ivestock p roduction.
3 .1 3 .1
P hysical b ackground ( i)
R elief a nd d rainage
T he
m ain
s trike o f t he r ock f ormations i n t he T hames ( Map 4 ).
n orth-east t o s outh-west t he C otswolds e scarpment, D owns,
a t a l ittle o ver 3 00 m .,
t he
d irection
i mmediately
o f
w est
L imestone R idge; i n
t he
i ts o f
w hich r ise
( Map 3 ).
a bove s ea l evel
T he s ource o f t he T hames i s 5k m. t he h eart o f t he C otswolds.
s outh-west o f C irencester,
c ourse
O xford
c hanging
a s
i t
s harply
p asses
a t
t hrough
t wo
p laces:
t he
C orallian
a nd a t t he G oring G ap w here i t f lows t hrough a
T he
n orth-west
b y
f irst
i n
F rom h ere t he r iver f lows e astwards w ith
c halk e scarpment a nd s o d ivides t he B erkshire D owns
C hilterns.
i s
a nd t he B erkshire
t he C hiltern H ills a nd t he N orth D owns e scarpments,
i n p laces t o j ust o ver 2 50 m .
b asin
T he h ighest p arts o f t he b asin a re
s tretch o f t he r iver v alley,
t he C otswolds e scarpment,
a nd
d efined t o
t o t he s outh b y
t he
g ap t he t he
s carp
s lope o f t he M arlborough a nd B erkshire D owns a nd t o t he e ast b y C hilterns e scarpment i s k nown a s t he U pper T hames v alley.
t he T he
d rainage s ystem i ncludes t he T hames a nd s everal m ajor t ributaries,
f or
e xample
t he C herwell a nd t he E venlode
( Map 2 ).
D owns a nd t he C hilterns t o t he n orth a nd w est, s outh
a nd
C entral L ondon t o t he e ast,
M iddle T hames r egion
( Gibbard 1 985,
t he K ennet,
C olne,
L odden,
W ith
B erkshire
t he N orth D owns t o t he
t he T hames
1 -3).
t he
f lows t hrough
t he
M ajor t ributary r ivers a re
W ey a nd t he M ole
( Map 2 ).
T he a rea o f t he
T hames v alley d ownstream o f C entral L ondon, a nd i ncluding t he L ea a nd D arent t ributaries ( Map 2 ) ' , i s k nown a s t he L ower T hames v alley. T he T hames h as F landrian m ain
p eriod.
r iver,
f or
f ollowed i ts p resent c ourse t hroughout m ost o f t he T he d iscovery o f s mall c hannels a djacent e xample a t F armoor,
1 979), F awley, B ucks. ( Needham a nd L angley p attern
o f
O xon.
( Lambrick a nd
( Farley 1 983, 1 69) a nd R unnymede, 1 980), s hows t hat t here w as a m ore
c hannels i n e arly p ost-glacial t imes t han i s i n
t o
t he
R obinson S urrey c omplex e vidence
t oday; o therwise t he c hannel s ystem h as r emained r elatively s table ( Robinson a nd L ambrick 1 984, 8 10; D evoy 1 980, 1 39). R unning p arallel w ith a nd a djacent t o t he T hames t hroughout i ts c ourse a re a s eries g ravel
t erraces
( Map 5 ).
T hese w ere f ormed a s t he T hames
a nd
o f i ts
f loodplain r esponded t o a s eries o f f alls i n s ea-level d uring t he P leistocene p eriod: a t e ach f all i n s ea-level t he r iver c ut t hrough i ts p revious f loodplain, l eaving t he r emains o f t his s tranded a s a t errace a djacent t o t he n ew f loodplain. T he w ide a lluvial f loodplain
- 1 5 -
i n
t he p resent s tretch o f t he U pper T hames i s a
b .c.
f eature;
w oodland
p ost-2nd
m illennium
i t h as b een s uggested t hat t his r esulted f rom i ncreased
c learance
a nd
a gricultural a ctivity
( Robinson a nd L ambrick 1 984,
8 13).
i n
l ater
p rehistory
I n t he T hames e stuary,
s ea l evels
h ave f luctuated s ince t he e nd o f t he P leistocene p eriod a nd t he c oastline i n t he o uter e stuary w ould h ave b een u p t o 2 k m. f urther o ut t o s ea d uring t he l ate 4 th a nd 3 rd m illennia s ection 3 .2(iii) b elow).
3 .1
( ii)
b .c.
( Fig.
3 .1:
s ee
L andscape r egions i n t he T hames b asin
T he T hames b asin,
o n t he b asis o f r elief,
d rainage a nd g eology,
i nto a n umber o f l andscape r egions
a nd 5 ).
T he n orth-western p art o f t he U pper T hames v alley c onsists o f
t he C otswold H ills:
( Map 3 :
s ee a lso M aps
4
d ivides
a n u ndulating o olite l imestone d ipslope d issected
b y a t rellised d rainage p attern f lowing i n a s outherly d irection. t he
s outhern e dge o f t he C otswolds,
t he T hames
t he
O xford
p erpendicular
C lay a nd K ellaway B eds,
A t
f lows e astwards a long t o
t he
C otswold
t ributaries t hat e nter t he r iver a t f requent i ntervals. H ere, t he T hames i s f lanked b y a s eries o f g ravel t erraces o verlying t he O xford C lay.
T o
t he
L imestone
s outh,
R idge
a
s eries o f h ills m aking
K immeridge a nd G ault C lay V ale. e nds
u p
T his f lat,
g ently
D owns,
a nd t he C hilterns.
u ndulating
d ownland c apped
C orallian
c halk
d ipslope,
b y s outh-flowing r ivers.
f rom
t he
r elatively l ow-lying a rea
d ramatically w ith t he c halk s carp s lope o f t he
B erkshire
t he
s eparates t he O xford C lay/gravel t erraces
M arlborough
a nd
B ehind t he s carp s lope i s
t he
s plit
i nto
b locks
o f
r olling
T he h igher b locks o f d ownland a re
b y C lay-with-flints a nd o ther s uperficial d eposits,
a nd
s ome
d ry v alleys c ontain C ombe D eposits. S outh C lays
o f
o f t he G oring G ap,
t he T hames f lows a cross
t he
T ertiary
t he M iddle T hames r egion a nd n orth-west p art o f t he
b asin s yncline.
A s eries o f g ravel t erraces,
L ondon
w ider a nd u nrelated t o
t hose i n t he U pper T hames b asin, l ies a djacent t o t he T hames i n t his s tretch. F rom C entral L ondon o nwards, t he T hames b ecomes t idal a nd i s f lanked
b y
t erraces.
t he E ssex a nd K ent b rickearth c oastal p lains T he
a nd
g ravel
l ower s tretches o f m ost t ributary v alleys j oining t he
M iddle a nd L ower T hames c ontain F landrian p eat o r t ufa d eposits. T he N orth D owns d ipslope l ies t o t he s outh o f t he L ondon C lay a nd K ent
b rickearths,
n orth-flowing
a nd
r ivers.
i s d ivided i nto b locks o f c halk T he
m ore p rominent p arts o f
d ownland
t he
D owns
b y a re
c overed w ith s uperficial d eposits, m ainly C lay-with-flints a nd P lateau D rift,
a nd d ry v alleys
f requently c ontain C ombe D eposits.
T he r ivers
d issecting t he D owns o riginate s outh o f t he N orth D owns e scarpment, t he W eald. c lays, W eald.
s ands a nd s andstones, T he
i mmediately
i n
T his i s a n a rea o f a lternating e ast-west r unning b ands o f L ow s outh
d ivided i nto t he L ow W eald a nd t he H igh
W eald i ncludes t he G ault C lay a nd o f
t he D owns;
L ower
t he l andscape t hen r ises
W ealden S ands a nd C lays o f t he H igh W eald.
-1 6-
G reensand t o
t he
•
-----n
,
2 0k m , -1
F igure 3 .1
T he a pproximate p osition o f t he c oastline i n t he e stuary:
A ,
T hames
a t t he e nd o f t he T hames I I t ransgression
( c . 3 500 b .c.); _ t ransgression ( c.
B ,
a t
t he s tart o f t he T hames
2 000 b .c.).
- 1 7 -
A fter D evoy 1 980,
I II
1 36-7.
3 .2
C limate,
s oils a nd v egetation i n t he 5 th - 3 rd m illennia b .c.
C limatic p eriod s tudies f loor
c hanges
h ave
b een
a nd,
i n
s outhern B ritain
m ore g enerally,
c ores
d uring
r econstructed f rom p ollen
1 975;
( Evans
a nd
p rehistoric m acrofossil
f rom o xygen i sotope a nalyses o f S immons a nd
T ooley
D evensian G laciation t emperatures r ose s teadily, O ptimum '
t he p lant
d uring t he A tlantic p eriod
( c.
1 981).
5 500- c .
3 200 b .c.),
t han t hose p revailing t oday ( Godwin 1 940:
W est 1 970: c .
C hronozone F II).
3 200 - c .
6 00 b .c.
t he
r eaching a ' Climatic
r elatively d ry c ontinental c limate a nd m ean t emperatures c . h igher
o cean
A fter
w ith a
2° 3°
P ollen Z one
C .
V IIa;
F ollowing t his i s t he S ub-Boreal p eriod,
( Godwin 1 940:
P ollen Z one V IIb;
W est 1 980:
C hronozone F III),
f or w hich i t h as b een s uggested t hat t he c limate w as
s till
d rier t han i n t he
w arm
b ut
e vidence f or t his i s d isputable I n s ome c ases, a nd
S ub-Boreal
( Smith 1 981, l ast
5 000
w ere d ifferent f rom
y ears h ave l ed t o d egradation b y
m illennia b .c. 1 974)
p eat
p resent-day
v arious
( Evans 1 971;
o r m arine t ransgressions m olluscan d eposits
e nvironmental c ontinuous
t he
s oils
p rocesses,
d ate h ave b een f ound i n a n umber o f l ocalities,
a nd
i n
v alleys
r econstruction.
p ollen
d iagrams
f or
( Devoy
1 972;
1 980;
e ither
D imbleby a nd M urphy
1 984).
p alaeobotanical a nalyses c arried o ut
s amples c ollected f rom t hese p rofiles, a nd
t he
B uried s oil p rofiles o f 5 th - 3 rd
p reserved u nder n eolithic e arthworks P edological,
h owever,
H arding 1 982).
c hanges i n v egetation c over a nd l and u se o ver t he
e xample l eaching a nd p odsolization.
E vans
p eriod; 1 33;
i t c an b e d emonstrated t hat s oils i n t he A tlantic
p eriods
1 45);
A tlantic
( Smith 1 981,
a s w ell a s a lluvial,
6 ),
( Map H owever,
p rovide
f or t he T hames b asin,
w ere o btained f rom t he i nner e stuary.
e vidence
t here a re
f ew
o n
c olluvial f or
s ubstantial
a nd m ost o f
t hese
I t i s t hus v irtually i mpossible
t o r ecord t he e xtent a nd c omposition o f f orest c over a nd t he l ongevity o f
c learance
p hases f or t he e ntire s tudy a rea.
n eolithic B ritain,
W ith
r eference
S mith h as s tated t hat i t i s " still v ery
t o
d ifficult
t o m ake a n i nformed e nvironmental r econstruction f or a ny p articular l ocality" ( 1981, 2 00). T he a ccount p resented h ere w ill d escribe r ecent p alaeoenvironmental a nalyses c onducted a t r easonably w ell-dated s ites,
a nd
u se
t his
i nformation t o p rovide a
c hanges i n v egetation c over,
g eneral
p icture
o f
s oils a nd g round-water c onditions i n t he
5 th - 3 rd c onsidered
m illennia b .c. T he e vidence o f f aunal h ere; t he d eposition o f a nimals o ften
a ctivities
p ractised a t t he s ite i n q uestion a nd d oes n ot n ecessarily
r eflect t he s urrounding e nvironment 1 984).
3 .2
( i)
( Grigson 1 982,
T he l imestone u plands a nd c lay v ales o f
r emains r elates 3 06;
t he
i s t o
n ot t he
c ontra S mith
U pper
T hames
b asin O ne
p ollen
s equence h as b een p roduced f or t his r egion,
o nly c overs t he p re-Boreal t o A tlantic p eriods.
b ut
T he s amples f or
i t t he
a nalysis w ere t aken f rom a c alcareous f en f illing a v alley c ut i nto t he C orallian L imestone a t C othill, n ear O xford ( Map 6 : C lapham a nd C lapham s equence
1 939). p robably
G iven
t he n arrow w idth o f t he
r eflects
t he v egetation c over
v alley o n
f loor, t he
t his
C orallian
R idge, a nd t hus g ives a n i ndication o f w oodland c over o n l imestone i n t he U pper T hames b asin.
-1 8-
T he u ppermost s ample c overs t he e nd o f Z one V IIa ( i.e.
c .
4 000 -
c . 3 200 b .c.), a nd p roduced a p re-clearance c limax o ak/elm w oodland s pectrum. C orylus h ad f allen b elow i ts e arlier l evels, w hile T ilia a nd
A lnus h ad a ppeared.
t ype
a t
3 8%,
C orylus,
t hen
Q uercus w as t he m ost a bundant a t 3 5% ,
A lnus
T ilia a t 1 7% a nd
a lthough n ot i ncluded i n t he t ree p ollen s um,
t otal a rboreal p ollen.
T he h igh v alue o f T ilia,
r ate o f p ollen d ispersal,
t ree
p ollen
U lmus
8 % .
a t
w as 4 0% o f t he
c oupled w ith i ts p oor
s uggests t hat l ime w as p robably t he d ominant
t ree s pecies i n t he d eciduous w oodland c anopy o n l imestone s oils. A lthough s ome c harcoal w as p resent t owards t he b ottom o f t he p rofile, t here a re n o 1i ndications o f m esolithic w oodland c learance r eflected i n t he d iagram. M olluscan w ith
a nalysis
n eolithic
e vidence
f or
o f b uried s oils a nd d itch
m onuments t he
U pper
p rovides t he T hames
b ulk
i n t he
f ills
o f
5 th
t he
- 3 rd
a ssociated
e nvironmental m illennia
A lthough m olluscan a nalysis c annot r eveal t he c omposition o f c over,
i t
p rovides
a
g ood
i ndication
o f
t he
l ocal
b .c.
w oodland
e nvironment
( Dimbleby a nd E vans 1 974). T he e arlier n eolithic c hambered c airn a t A scott-under-Wychwood i n t he O xfordshire C otswolds ( Map 6 ) overlay p receding 1 971, a
p hases
4 0).
o f b oth m esolithic a nd
t urfline
t his l evel.
b ase
( Evans
( Evans
1 971,
3 1).
h orizon N eolithic
w ere r ecovered f rom t he t urfline a nd f rom s everal p its
t hrough t his h orizon; b elow
a ctivity
a nd r elatively s tone-free z one o verlying a s tony
d eveloped o n a l ime-rich p arent m aterial a rtefacts
n eolithic
T he p re-cairn s oil p rofile w as c lassed a s a r endsina w ith
o therwise,
N umerous s ubsoil h ollows w ere l ocated
o f t he r endsina s oil,
c ut
n othing o f n eolithic d ate o ccurred b elow
t he
t he u pper f ills o f w hich c ontained t he B -
h orizon o f a b rown-earth s oil. M esolithic f lintwork, c harred h azelnut s hells a nd f ragments o f b urnt b one w ere f ound s ealed b elow t he a rtefactually s terile b rown-earth s oil i n o ne o f t hese h ollows 1 971, w as
3 8). f ound
f ill
o f
i n a ssociation w ith t he m esolithic m aterial i n t he s ubsoil h ollow ( Evans
1 971,
3 5),
s mall-scale
w oodland c learance a t t his t ime.
o f t he h ollow y ielded a f auna w hich i ndicated
f ill
o ver o f t he a rboreal c anopy, d evelopment
o f
s ampled f or p ollen a nalysis, t ree
T he
S oil s amples f rom a
1 971,
3 6-40).
t urfline
o f
w as t he
c onsisted s ealed
b y
T ilia,
t he b uried r endsina s oil
f ragments,
t he
f lintwork
a n
w hile t he l ater p hase
f rom b .c.
( BM-492)
T hus t he p lace p hase
u nderlying
s ubsoil
c omprised
p ottery
b .c.
1 971,
4 0).
t he
d isturbed C harcoal
( BM-491b),
t he s urface o f t he t urfline g ave a d ate o f 2 785 ( Evans
o pen-
a nd f ragments o f a nimal b one o n a nd w ithin
p it 7 p roduced a C -14 d ate o f 2 943 + 7 0 f rom
a nd
s preads o f
a ctivity t ook T he e arlier
t urfline. T he l and s urface d id n ot a ppear t o h ave b een d rastically, f or e xample b y p loughing ( Evans 1 971, 3 9-40). c harcoal
c ould
( Dimbleby
f lints,
p its d ug i nto t he s oil p rofile a nd t urf-line,
T he
w hich
c ontained
F ragments o f p ottery,
c leared a nd t wo p hases o f d omestic c hambered c airn w as c onstructed. o f
w as
b ut p ollen p reservation w as p oor.
o f t he r egenerated w oodland c over
m olluscan f auna.
t he
T he b rown-earth s p
c harcoal a nd s everal p its w ere a ssociated w ith t his h orizon. f orest b efore
t he
c losing
s uggesting w oodland r egeneration a nd t he
s pecies r epresented w ere C orylus a nd
r eflect c omponents E vans 1 974, 1 21).
c ountry
l ower
i ndicating
a b rown-earth s oil w hen m esolithic o ccupation o f
c ame t o a n e nd ( Evans
m ain
t he
p ossibly
u pper
s ite
( Evans
A m olluscan f auna r eflecting a n o pen w oodland e nvironment
w hile +
7 0
T he b uried s oil p rofile b elow t he
- 1 9 -
H azleton I I c hambered c airn i n t he G loucestershire C otswolds p roduced d omestic d ebris o f b oth l ater m esolithic a nd e arlier n eolithic d ate, i ncluding t he r emains o f a n eolithic s tructure a nd c ontemporary m idden ( Map 6 : S aville 1 984a, 1 9). P reliminary p edological a nalysis s uggests
t he p ossibility o f p re-cairn c ultivation,
b ut
c onfirmation
a nd f urther d etails o f t he e nvironmental s equence a t t he a wait t he r esults o f w ork i n p rogress. S oil
s amples
f or m olluscan a nalysis w ere t aken f rom
s ite
t he
m ust
d itch
f ills o f t he C ondicote h enge i n t he G loucestershire C otswolds ( Map 6 : B ell 1 983a). B eaker-related p ottery w as r ecovered f rom t he l ower, b ut n ot p rimary, f ill o f t he d itch; i n a ssociation w as c harcoal f rom w hich t wo C -14 d ates w ere o btained : 1 770 + 8 0 b .c. ( HAR 3064) a nd 1 720 + 1 00 b .c. ( HAR 3067) ( Saville 1 983, 4 6). T he m olluscan f auna i ncluded s pecies w hich i ndicated t hat t he m onument h ad b een c onstructed 4 4).
i n
o pen w oodland c onditions a nd t all g rass
( Bell
1 983a,
L imited e nvironmental e vidence f or t he 5 th - 3 rd m illennia b .c. i s a vailable f rom t he U pper T hames g ravel t erraces. S ilted u p r iver c hannels c ontaining p eaty d eposits w ere i nvestigated a t M ingies D itch, F armoor a nd B uscot L ock, a ll i n O xfordshire ( Map 6 : R obinson a nd W ilson 1 987). M ingies D itch a nd F armoor p roduced w oodland p lant r emains o f p robable B oreal d ate ( c. 7 000 - c . 5 500 b .c.), w hile A lnus g lutinosa l ogs f rom t he b ottom o f t he p eat a t B uscot L ock p roduced a d ate o f 2 060 + 9 0 b .c. ( HAR 4491). T he p lant r emains a nd p ollen a nalysis s uggested a w oodland e nvironment o n t he b ank o f t he r iver a nd p erhaps e xtending o nto t he f irst t errace a s w ell. A lnus s p. w as t he m ain t ree s pecies p resent, f ollowed b y Q uercus s p. a nd T ilia s p. I t i s s uggested t hat l ime w as p erhaps d ominant o n t he l imestone h ills n orth o f B uscot, w hile o ak a nd p erhaps a lder w ere m ore i mportant i n t he m ixed w oodland o n t he c lay s lopes. A T hrupp
m id 3 rd m illennium b .c. s ite B , n ear A bingdon,
r ing-ditch o n t he f irst t errace a t O xon. ( Map 6 ), w hich p roduced b oth
A bingdon a nd M ortlake W ares a nd a f lake-dominated f lint a ssemblage, y ielded a n o pen-country m olluscan f auna ( Robinson a nd W ilson, 1 987). T he a lluvial h orizon o f a t runcated s ol l essivg w as d iscovered b eneath t he b ank o f t he D evil's Q uoits h enge o n t he s econd t errace a t S tanton H arcourt, O xon. ( Map 6 : L imbrey 1 975, 1 90). A C -14 d ate o f 2 060 + 1 20 b .c. ( HAR 1887) w as o btained f rom t he p rimary s ilting o f t he d itch, w hile a nimal b one f rom t he s econdary s ilts g ave a d ate o f 1 640 +7 0 b .c. ( HAR 1888) ( Case 1 986, 3 2). A t o ne t ime s ols l essivgs w ere c onsidered t o r esult f rom w oodland c learance a nd c ultivation ( Limbrey 1 975, 1 85), b ut r ecently i t h as b een s hown t hat t hese s oils d evelop u nder w oodland c onditions ( Limbrey 1 978, 2 1; F isher 1 982). F isher ( 1982, 3 03) s uggests t hat s ols l essivgs w ould a lready h ave b een w ell d eveloped p eriod,
i n a nd
p arts o f s outhern E ngland b y t he e nd
o f
t he
A tlantic
t hat i t i s t he r emains o f t hese s oils t hat a re p reserved
b y s ome n eolithic m onuments. U ntil
t he
e nd o f t he 4 th m illennium b .c.,
m uch
o f
t he
U pper
T hames w as c overed b y m ixed d eciduous w oodland; l ime w as p robably t he d ominant t ree s pecies o n t he l imestone s oils, w ith o ak a nd a lder d ominant i n t he r iver v alleys. W oodland c learings c ertainly a ppeared d uring t he e arly 3 rd m illennium b .c., b ut t he e xtent a nd d uration o f f orest c learance i s d ifficult t o e stimate. P arts o f t he C otswolds
- 2 0 -
certainly remained under woodland until the end of the 3rd millennium b.c., for example Condicote, Glos., while there were areas of the Thames gravel terraces which had been cleared by the mid 3rd millennium b.c., for example Thrupp, Oxon. 3.2
(ii)
The Marlborough and Berkshire Downs, the Chilterns and the North Downs chalklands
As in the Cotswolds, most palaeoenvironmental evidence for the chalk Downs is derived from molluscan analysis of buried soil profiles. However, some pollen analysis of peat deposits on or adjacent to the chalk and investigation of colluvial deposits in dry valleys has been carried out. Pollen analysis of peats in a valley mire situated on superficial deposits overlying chalk at Snelsmore Common, Berks. (Map 6) showed that there was minimal disturbance of peat associated with the the forest cover until the early Iron Age: first clearance of the area around the mire produced a C-14 date of 620.::.. 90 b.c. (HAR-4241) (Waton 1982, 83). Excavations at a North Downs scarp slope dry valley overlooking the River Darent at Otford, Kent (Map 6) revealed an extensive build up of colluvial deposits, with loess present in the deeper layers. Analysis of the molluscan fauna extracted from these deposits indicated a forested environment succeeded by a clearance horizon; this horizon was associated with flintwork and sherds of Beaker and Peterborough Wares (Pyke 1980, 328-9). A C-14 date of 2280 + 80 b.c. (HAR-3690) has been obtained from charcoal which is considered to be associated with the clearance horizon in the combe (Pyke 1981, 295). A dry valley on the Chilterns escarpment at Pitstone, Bucks. has also been investigated for palaeoenvironmental information (Map 6: Evans and Valentine 1974). A thin layer of Clay-with-flints and loess was found to overlie Coombe Deposits. This layer had developed into a typical brown calcareous earth on the valley slopes and a similar but wetter soil in the valley bottom. Molluscs in the soil demonstrated a woodland environment, but overlying this soil was a calcareous silt loam which contained molluscs indicating open-country conditions, the silt loam layer probably resulting from the ploughing of the drier soils on the slopes after the vegetation cover had been cleared. Charcoal fragments recovered from the drier slope soils gave a C-14 date of 1960 .::_ 220 b.c. (HAR-327) (Evans and Valentine 1974, 350-1). Examination of peaty deposits close to the chalk and colluvial deposits in dry valleys indicates considerable local variation in vegetation cover and land use on the chalklands in the 3rd millennium b.c. In certain localities woodland was cleared by the end of the 3rd millennium b.c., while other areas remained under woodland cover until after the mid 2nd millennium b.c. It has been suggested that this uneven spread of woodland clearance might reflect the distribution of loess overlying Clay-with-flints (Bell 1982; Waton 1982, 87). High nutrient status, water-retentive loess-based soils are ubiquitous on the chalk Downs in southern England (Catt 1978, 14), but in some areas have suffered erosion and redeposition as colluvial deposits in dry valleys since the 3rd millennium b.c., in particular on the South Downs (Bell 1983b, 147). For places where there is minimal evidence for woodland disturbance before the end of the Bronze Age, for example Snelsmore Common, Berks., it has been argued that significant loess - 21 -
removal occurred before the 4th millennium b.c., leaving base deficient and clay soils which would have been less attractive for agriculture (Waton 1982, 87). the Further information on the variation in land use on chalklands after initial woodland clearance derives from the study of buried soil profiles. Seven neolithic monuments on the Downs at the headwaters of the River Kennet, Wilts. have been investigated by Evans (1971; 1972; in Ashbee et al. 1979). The barrows, Beckhampton Road, South Street, Horslip and West Kennet (Map 6), were all built in an open-country environment (1971, 65-66). The buried soil profile below Beckhampton Road varied according to the nature of the underlying parent material from a rendsina to a brown earth of sol lessiv� type. The molluscan faunas from the rendsina suggest an initial woodland cover which was later cleared giving rise to a grassland environment; charcoal from the base of the turfline produced a C-14 date of 3250.:. 160 b.c. (NPL-138), while an antler on the buried surface gave a date of 2517 .:_ 90 b.c. (BM-506b). There was no evidence from the soil profile of tillage and it is suggested that the grassland environment was maintained by animal grazing (Ashbee et al. 1979, 281). The South Street pre-barrow soil was a rendsina (Ashbee et al. 1979, 282). Soil samples were taken through the buried soil for both molluscan and pollen analysis. A dry woodland molluscan fauna and a woodland pollen spectrum with Corylus as the dominant species, supported by Quercus, Betula, Ulmus, Alnus and Pinus, were derived from the bottom of the soil profile (Ashbee et al. 1979, 288). The molluscan fauna indicates that gradual woodland clearance followed, the pollen record suggesting that clearance was of a fairly local nature with areas of scrub woodland remaining around the site. At this stage, the soil profile was truncated by plough marks resulting from cross-ploughing with an ard. Finally, a phase of grassland became established before the barrow mound was constructed (Ashbee et al • .1979, 296). Charcoal from the surface of the buried soil gave a C-14 date of 2810 + 180 b.c. (BM-356). Soil samples for molluscan analysis were also taken through the south ditch fills. The primary fill contained an open-country fauna; two C-14 dates of 2750 + 135 b.c. (BM-357) and 2670 .:_ 140b.c. (BM-358b) were obtained from animal bone and antler respectively from the bottom of the north ditch. The secondary fill produced shade-loving species indicative of woodland regeneration (Ashbee et al. 1979, 293). Sherds from at least six vessels of Ebbsfleet/Mortlake type Ware, animal bone and a fire fractured fragment of a flaked and partly ground thin-butted axe were The top of the secondary fill was recovered from the upper layer. truncated by cross-ploughing with an ard, this time associated with Beaker pottery and a molluscan fauna reflecting woodland clearance and the establishment of a grassland environment (Ashbee et al. 1979, 298). Two barrows constructed elsewhere on the chalk Downs within the Thames catchment have been sampled for molluscan analysis. Wayland's Smithy II (Map 6), a chambered tomb on the Berkshire Downs yielded an open-country fauna from the buried soil, which was thought to have been disturbed by cultivation. Charcoal from the surface of the buried soil gave a C-14 date of 2820 + 130 b.c. (I-2328) (Evans 1971, 65: 1912, 262 and 265). However, the soil profile under the kidney shaped barrow of the Chilterns at Whiteleaf Hill, Bucks. (Map 6) - 22 -
p roduced
a w oodland f auna ( Kennard i n C hilde a nd
S mith
1 954,
2 30).
T he b uried s oil c ontained e arlier n eolithic p ottery a nd f lintwork t hat p robably
r epresents
d omestic
c onstruction o f t he b arrow. t o
e ither
a
r egeneration
a ctivity
o n t he
p re-settlement/monument
b etween
s ite
p rior
t o
t he
T he w oodland f auna c ould t herefore r elate
t he
p hase
o f
e nvironment
d omestic
o r
w oodland
a ctivity
a nd
t he
c onstruction o f t he b arrow. I n c halk a nd
c ontrast D owns,
K nap
H ill
h eadwaters s pecies
t o t he e nvironmental e vidence f rom b arrows c ausewayed e nclosures s ituated o n t he
o f
t he
( Evans
( Map 6 ) w ere b oth
K ennet
6 6 ;
1 971,
S parks i n C onnah 1 965,
D imbleby a nd E vans
1 9-20),
t he
w oodland
1 26
a nd
1 28;
E arlier n eolithic
a nd f lintwork w as r ecovered f rom b oth s ites:
C -14 d ates
b .c.
f rom c harcoal i n t he p rimary d itch f ill
( BM-74)
a t
b y
1 974,
( BM-73)
-
t he
s uggesting t hat t hese e nclosures w ere
2 960 + 1 56b.c. f rom H ill
D owns
d ominated
b oth c onstructed i n r estricted w oodland c learings. p ottery
o n
m olluscan f aunas f rom b uried s oils a t t he W indmill H ill
w ere
o btained
W indmill H ill, w hile a ntler f rom t he p rimary d itch f ill a t K nap p roduced a d ate o f 2 760 + 1 15 b .c. ( BM-105). T he e arlier
n eolithic e nclosures o n t he S outh D owns e scarpment w ere a lso b uilt s mall-scale w oodland c learings
l ater
n eolithic
s uggesting
d ate,
i n
( Thomas 1 982).
T he A vebury h enge m onument a nd S ilbury H ill, o f
o f
f rom c harcoal i n t he b uried s oil a nd 2 580 + 1 50
y ielded
( Map 6 ),
W ilts.
o pen-country
m olluscan
b oth
f aunas
6 5-
a g rassland e nvironment o f l ong d uration ( Evans 1 971,
6 ).
I n t he s oil p rofile u nder t he b ank a t A vebury,
w ere
f ound i n a ssociation w ith m olluscs s uggesting f orest
c learance.
A bove t his l ay a t urfline c ontaining a n o pen-country f auna
i ndicative
o f
g rassland
M olluscan i n
1 982
( Evans
1 972,
2 74;
c ross-ploughmarks
D imbleby a nd E vans
1 974,
1 22-3).
a nalysis o f t his t urfline e xposed d uring c onstruction s uggested
t hat t he g rassland w as
u ndergrazed o r l ightly g razed ( Evans e t a l.
i mpoverished 1 985,
a nd
3 10).
w ork e ither
P eterborough
W are h as b een l ocated e lsewhere u nder t he b ank a t A vebury ( Piggott G ray 1 935, w as
1 40).
d evoid o f m olluscs.
t urves t urves
i n
S ilbury H ill w as c onstructed o n a b rown-earth w hich T he c entral p art o f t he m ound w as b uilt
o f
c ut f rom a r endsina s oil. V egetation f rom t he s urface o f t he w as e xceptionally w ell-preserved a nd i ncluded m osses a nd
g rasses i ndicative o f a c halk g rassland t hat m ay h ave o riginated f rom a n orth-facing s lope; t he s urface h ad b een m oderately g razed ( Williams
1 976,
2 69).
s pecies o f m olluscs m ound i tself w as
T he
t urf s tack a lso
( Evans ' 1 972, 2 66-7). p robably e xtensive
p roduced
g rassland a nd h azel s crub p redominating ( Evans 1 972, o f b .c.
2 69).
A s ample
t he s urface v egetation o f t he t urves g ave a C-1 4 d ate o f 2 145 + 9 5 ( 1-4136)
( Atkinson
1 969,
2 16).
F ive m ore
o btained f rom o rganic m atter i n t he t urf s tack: 9 10-A),
2 620 + 1 20 b .c.
1 30 b .c. 2 65).
( ST -910-C-H)
( SI-910-C),
a nd 2 365 + 1 10 b .c.
e ncountered
c halk D owns.
( SI 19 10-D),
( SI-910-B)
1 -, er i n
( SI-
2 515 +
t ufa, d rain
1 9727
h ave t he
C olne a nd L ea
N ewbury a nd T hatcham i n 3 67; P eake 1 935; K eith-
, ulne v alley,
2 3
w ere
( Evans
a nd b ands o f
P eat d eposits a ccumulated i n t he K ennet,
( nnm.;
d ates
i n t ributary v alleys o f t he T hames t hat
v alleys d uring t he A tlantic p eriod ( Map 6 : t he K ennet v alley, B erks.: C hurchill 1 962, L uc s p ers.
C-1 4
2 725 + 1 10 b .c.
2 580 + 1 10 b .c.
E xtensive t racts o f a lluvium a nd p eat, b een
o pen-country
C learance o n t he s ite o f t he w ith n on-calcareous w eedy
B ucks.:
L acaille 1 963,
2 06;
B roxbourne i n t he L ea v alley,
r esponse
( the T hames I I t ransgression : l ed
H erts.:
W arren e t a l.
1 934)
i n
t o t he r ise i n w ater t able a ssociated w ith s ea-level c hanges D evoy 1 980,
1 37;
G odwin 1 941).
t o t he b urial o f e arlier m esolithic s ites i n t he l ower
T his
s tretches
o f t hese v alleys a nd, i n t he c ase o f t he K ennet v alley, t o t he e stablishment o f l ater m esolithic s ites f arther u pstream ( Jacobi 1 973 , 2 41).
M any
d eposits: m esolithic
o f
t he
s mall v alleys i n
t he
C hilterns
c ontain
t ufa
a t G errards C ross i n t he M isbourne v alley, B ucks, a l ater f lint a ssemblage a nd a nimal b ones h ave b een f ound w ithin ( Map 6 :
a nd b elow t ufa d eposits
F arley 1 983,
1 69).
T hese d eposits
f orm i n s wampy p ools i n l ow-lying a reas s urrounded b y w oodland
( Evans
1 975 , 2 99). T he e nvironmental s equence f or t he c halk D owns i s s imilar t o t hat d escribed
f or t he U pper T hames c atchment.
M ixed d eciduous
c overed t he D owns i n t he 4 th m illennium b .c., b y
t he
e arly
a ssociated
3 rd
w ith
m illennium b .c.
S ome o f
a gricultural a ctivity,
w oodland
w ith c learings a ppearing t hese
f or
c learings
e xample
S outh
w ere
S treet,
W ilts., w hile o thers m ay h ave b een u sed f or t he s ole p urpose o f c onstructing m onuments, f or e xample W indmill H ill a nd K nap H ill c ausewayed l ate
e nclosures,
3 rd
W ilts.
m illennium b .c.
t hese m onuments,
W oodland r egeneration i n t he m id
t o
i s r ecorded i n t he d itch f ills o f s ome
o f
f or e xample S outh S treet,
W ilts.
T his l ed B radley
( 1978) a nd W hittle ( 1978) t o p ostulate c hanges i n f arming p ractice a t t he e nd o f t he e arlier n eolithic p eriod i n r esponse t o d iminishing a gricultural
r esources
d eclining f ertility, ( Bradley 1 978, o f
e arthen
r esulting
s oil e rosion,
9 8).
H owever,
b arrows o f
A vebury
m onument,
m illenium b .c., w hich
v arious
f actors
s uch
a s
f amines o r d isease
t he l ocal e nvironments i n t he v icinity
c onstructed b y 2 500
r epresentative h enge
f rom
a dverse h arvest, b .c.
a re
t he l andscape a s a w hole:
n ot
n ecessarily
S ilbury H ill
a nd
t he
b oth d ating t o t he s econd h alf o f
t he
3 rd
w ere b uilt i n w ell-established g rassland e nvironments
w ere p robably m aintained b y g razing.
I n c ertain a reas,
t hen,
a gricultural a ctivity w as s till v ery m uch i n e vidence i n t he l ate
3 rd
m illennium b .c.
3 .2
( iii)
t he
T he L ower T hames v alley
T he
s ea-level a round t he B ritish c oastline h as f luctuated
e nd
o f
i sostatic
t he
D evensian
r ecovery.
T he
G laciation d ue m elting
t o
e ustatic
o f t he i ce
s heets
s ince
r ises
a nd
a nd
g laciers
t hroughout t he n orthern h emisphere r esulted i n r ises i n s ea-level, w hile t he u pward a nd d ownward t ilting o f l and m asses a fter t he w eight o f
i ce
o n
t hem
s ubmergence
o f
d ownwarping s ea-level m agnitude b iogenic
d ue
h ad
b een r eleased h as l ed
c oastlines.
I n t he
t o
T hames
t he
e stuary,
e mergence t he
t o i sostatic r ecovery a nd t he i ntermittent
h as
r esulted
i n
a
n umber
o f
m arine
a nd
d uration
o f
t hese i ncursions
a re
t he T hames e stuary ( Devoy 1 980,
1 34-6).
r ise
i ncursions. r ecorded
a nd i norganic s ediments d eposited i n l ow-lying a reas
a nd
t ectonic i n T he
i n
t he
a round
C -14 d ating h as b een u sed t o
d ate t he d eposits r elating t o e ach i ncursion a nd i n c ertain l ocalities t hese
s ediments
( Devoy 1 980;
h ave b een s hown t o o verlie n eolithic
M urphy 1 984).
- 2 4 -
s oil
p rofiles
D evoy h as r ecognised f ive m ain m arine t ransgressions o n t he n orth K ent s ide o f t he T hames e stuary f or t he 7 ).
l ast 1 0,000 y ears
T he T hames I I t ransgression i s d ated b etween c .
b .c.,
( 1980,
1 36-
4 500 a nd c .
3 450
w hile t he T hames I II t ransgression i s d ated t o b etween c .
a nd c .
8 50 b .c.
c oastline
( Devoy 1 980,
1 37).
a t t he e nd o f t he T hames I I t ransgression a nd a t t he
o f t he T hames I II t ransgression i s s hown i n F ig. A b een
n umber
s equence
f or
t he
r ecorded
t he
i nfluence l eaving
T hames
e stuary;
t he
I t ransgression,
t here w as a
f rom t he i nner e stuary b etween c . r ecently
D evoy
r emoval p lant
( 1980).
o f
5 000 a nd c .
s ubmerged a reas a vailable f or
m arine
4 600
b .c.,
c olonization.
t he v egetation w as d ominated b y a lder c arr,
a lder-oak f en w oodland.
h ave
p alaeoenvironmental
b y t hese d iagrams i s s ummarized b y
T hames
I nitially,
s tart
3 .1.
o f p ollen d iagrams c overing t he F landrian p eriod
c ompiled
A fter
1 900
T he a pproximate p osition o f t he
a nd l ater
b y
F ollowing t he T hames I I t ransgression a p hase
o f m arine r egression o ccurred b etween c .
3 500 a nd c .
2 000 b .c.,
w ith
d iffering e nvironmental c onditions b ecoming e stablished i n t he e stuary a t
t his t ime.
s wamp
I n t he T ilbury a rea i n E ssex
a nd s altmarsh p eats d eveloped,
M arsh,
K ent
( Map 6 )
a ccumulation
( Map 6 ) P hragmites
b ut u pstream w est o f
a n i nitial p hase o f P hragmites a nd s altmarsh p eat
g ave w ay t o a n a lder-oak f enwood p eat,
b efore t he
r eturn
o f
P hragmites r eedswamp a nd s altmarsh d eposits
1 41).
I n s ome p laces a d rier o ak-hazel f en w oodland
t he p rominence o f G ramineae, t hat
t his
e nvironment
T here
d eveloped,
s easonally
w et,
d ecline n o.
M arsh,
a llowing
( Devoy 1 980, w et
m erely t he o ccasional c learance a nd i solated b urning o f 1 41-2).
i n U lmus p ollen v alues a ppears
p ollen s pectra f or t he T hames e stuary. ( Lab.
b ut
C yperaceae a nd n on-arboreal p ollen s hows
p robably r emained
t he f en w ood ( Devoy 1 980,
S tone
1 980,
i s l ittle e vidence f or h uman e xploitation o f t hese
l owland a reas,
A
f inal
( Devoy
l ight-demanding h erb-dominated p lants t o c ontinue g rowing 1 41).
r eed
B roadness
n ot
q uoted) K ent
( Map
c onsistently
i n
a ll
A C -14 d ate o f 2 980 + 1 10 b .c.
w as o btained f or t he e lm d ecline h orizon 6 ),
a d ate w hich i s
c onsistent
w ith
a t t he
p osition o f t his h orizon i n o ther d ated T hames e stuary p ollen s pectra, f or
e xample
T ilbury
( Devoy
1 980,
1 42).
T he
f irst
a ppearance o f P lantago l anceolata c oincides w ith t he e lm d oes t he r ise i n t he p ollen o f r uderal p lants. u niform
f or
e ach
g round w ater l evel. C orylus t hat
s ite,
h umanly-worked,
o r
( Devoy 1 980,
p roduced
variations s ame
i n
h orizon
b ut i t i s u ncertain w hether t hese b y
a s
t his i s n ot
c ut a nd s haped b ranches o f A lnus,
a nd Q uercus w ere f ound i n p eat d eposits a t t he
t he e lm d ecline o ccurs,
p rocess
H owever,
a nd p robably r eflects l ocal
A t L ittlebrook,
s ignificant d ecline,
a nimals o r b y
s ome
o ther
w ere
n atural
1 44).
A p ollen s equence s panning t he l ate A tlantic a nd e arly S ub-Boreal p eriods h as b een o btained f rom w aterlogged d eposits c lose t o a l ater m esolithic s ite o n H ampstead H eath,
1 977;
1 985).
v alues
o ccur,
l ocally. a nd
I n
( Girling a nd G reig
v ery h igh t ree
p ollen
s uggesting t hat t here w as a t hick f orest c over g rowing
T ilia w as d ominant,
B etula,
G reater L ondon
t he l ate A tlantic p eriod,
a long
w ith s hrubs
f ollowed b y Q uercus a nd U lmus; s uch a s H edera,
w ere
a lso
P inus p resent.
A lnus w as p robably g rowing e xtensively i n t he w et a rea b y t he s ite a nd C orylus m ay h ave f ormed a f orest u nderstorey. f orest i s s hown b y t he p resence o f t races ( Girling a nd G reig 1 977,
4 7;
1 985, 3 48).
-25 -
S ome d isturbance o f t he o f P lantago l anceolata A bove t his h orizon,
t here
a re
s ignificantly
l ower
U lmus p ollen
i nclude f alls i n t he l evels o f Q uercus,
v alues.
A ssociated
T ilia a nd C orylus,
b y t he a ppearance o f C erealia a nd a r ise i n r uderals s uch a s l anceolata ( Girling a nd G reig 1 977, o f
t his
p ollen
s colytus
1 985,
3 49).
s equence i s t he a ssociation o f t he
( F.),
P lantago
T he i mportance b eetle
S colytus
w hich i s t he m ain c arrier o f t he f ungus w hich
D utch E lm D isease, a nd G reig 1 985,
c auses
i mmediately b elow t he e lm d ecline h orizon ( Girling
3 49).
T he e lm d ecline, i s
4 7;
c hanges
a ccompanied
o ccurring a t t he s tart o f t he S ub-Boreal p eriod,
a w idespread p henomenon a nd i s t he s ubject o f a c onsiderable
o f a rchaeological a nd b otanical l iterature w as
f irst
n oted
i n
t hroughout B ritain, t he L ake D istrict 1 ).
( Smith 1 981,
1 52-7)
a nd
i s
f or e xample i n I reland ( Smith 1 975;
( Pennington 1 975)
b ody
1 52-66).
b etween 3 300 a nd 3 100 b .c.
d ecline
a ttack,
L ynch 1 981),
a nd E ast A nglia ( Murphy 1 984,
i nduced
b y h uman a ction,
( Groenman-van W aateringe 1 983),
2 0m ean
I t i s s till u ncertain w hether t he
w as t he r esult o f n atural
o r
I t
r ecorded
C -14 d ates f or t he b eginning o f t he e lm d ecline h ave t heir
v alues e lm
D enmark
( Smith 1 981,
c auses,
f or
f or e xample
e xample
f ungal
w oodland
g razing
a lthough a s R owley-Conwy ( 1982,
2 06)
s tates " theories o f a n a nthropogenic c ause f or t he e lm d ecline a re v irtually r uled o ut b y t he s cale o f t he o perations t hey d emand." H owever, w ith t he d iscovery o f S colytus s colytus a t H ampstead, G irling a nd
G reig
( 1985,
3 51)
f avour a c ombination o f h uman a ctivities
d isease a s a m ore l ikely p ossibility f or t he c ause o f t he e lm t han a ny p reviously a dvanced h ypothesis. T ilia v alues r emain h igh, b .c.
i n t he 3 rd m illennium
a nd l ime m ay h ave f ormed a n i mportant c onstituent o f t he w oodland
c over a t t his t ime, t he
t hough s poradic,
a nd
d ecline
g rowing l ocally i n t he e stuary 's f en w oods a nd o n
n earby c halk d ownland.
t here i s a d ecline i n T ilia, c ereal t ype p ollen. T his e xpansion
o f
f arming
S ometime i n t he m id 3 rd m illennium
b .c.
a ccompanied b y t he f irst a ppearance o f i s p robably a ssociated w ith a m ajor
a ctivities o riginating f rom t he
c halk
D owns.
F rom c . 2 000 b .c., t he T hames I II m arine i nundation b rought a n i ncreasingly w aterlogged e nvironment t o e stuarine a reas, r esulting i n t he g eneration o f s edge f en, ( Devoy 1 980, 1 43). T he
p ollen
s equence
r eedswamp
a nd
s altmarsh
c ommunities
s pectra f rom t he L ower T hames v alley t hus p rovide
o f v egetational c hange a nd g round w ater c onditions
f or
a t he
5 th-3rd m illennia b .c. T his a rea, t hough, d oes n ot a ppear t o h ave b een a s i ntensively e xploited a s o ther p arts o f t he T hames c atchment, f or e xample t he c halk d ownland a t t he h eadwaters o f t he K ennet. I t i s p erhaps r easonable t o i nfer t hat T ilia w as a m ajor c omponent i n t he m ixed
d eciduous
1 983),
a nd
r ecorded n eolithic
t hat
b y
w oodland c over i n t he t he
e arly 3 rd
m olluscan
m onuments
a nalysis
4 th
m illennium
m illennium o f s oil
b .c.
p rofiles
i n t he T hames b asin c ould h ave
b .c.
( Grieg
c learance
p hases
p reserved b een
u nder
a ssociated
w ith t he e lm d ecline p henomenon p revalent i n o ther p arts o f B ritain a t t his t ime.
- 2 6 -
F ootnotes 1 .
P ollen
a nalysis a t t his t ime w as f airly u nsophisticated :
s mall
s amples w ere t aken f or a nalysis a t w ide s ampling i ntervals. w ould b e i nappropriate t o a ttempt a d etailed r econstruction t he v egetational h istory o f a r egion u sing p ollen d iagrams
I t o f o f
t his n ature. 2 .
P ollen c an s urvive i n s oils o f h igh p H v alue, f or e xample c alcareous s oils, p roviding t he s oil p rofile i s n ot b adly d isturbed a nd o xidised ( Dimbleby a nd E vans 1 974, 1 19-20). D ifferential p reservation o f p ollen b y s pecies i s a p ossibility, t hough, a s i s t he t ransfer o f c ertain t ypes o f p ollen g rain d own t he s oil p rofile. M olluscs a re a g ood i ndicator o f l ocal v egetation c onditions, p ollen a nalysis f rom
b ut t he r esults o f c ombined m olluscan a nd t he s ame s oil p rofile c an s ometimes b e
c onflicting. T his i s n ot s urprising, g iven t hat t here d ifferent f actors a ffecting t he i ncorporation o f m olluscs p ollen
i nto t he s oil.
T he i nterpretation o f t he
a re a nd
e nvironmental
s equence a t a p articular s ite m ust t herefore b e c arried i ts o wn m erits ( Dimbleby a nd E vans 1 974, 1 32).
o ut
o n
C hapter 4 .
L andscape c hange a nd t he c haracter o f n eolithic d omestic
T here
a re
t hree
s ites.
m ain
r easons
b ehind
t he
p aucity
k nown
d omestic s ites i n s outhern B ritain.
l andscape
h as b een s ubjected t o d enudational p rocesses o ver t he
5 000
o r m ore y ears.
p lace,
I n c ertain a reas,
F irst,
o f
n eolithic
t he n eolithic l ast
e xtensive e rosion h as
t aken
e ffectively d estroying m ost t races o f n eolithic a ctivity;
o thers,
c onsiderable
a ccumulated,
t hus
d eposits
m asking
o f
a lluvium
t he n eolithic
g round
n eolithic d omestic s ites w ere i nsubstantial i n l argely
o f
a nd
i n
c olluvium s urface.
c haracter,
h ave S econd,
c onsisting
w ooden s tructures w ith s hallow f oundations s urrounded
w orking a reas s ubsoil r emains.
b y
1a nd
o ther f acilities w hich w ould h ave l eft m odest T hird, m ost a rchaeological p rospection m ethods, f or
e xample a erial p hotography a nd g eophysical s urvey,
a re b iased t owards
t he r ecovery o f s ites w ith s ubstantial f eatures c ut i nto t he s ubsoil, o r e lse w ith s tone-built w alls. G iven t hese r estraints, i t c omes a s n o s urprise t hat t he m ajority o f n eolithic s ites p resently r ecorded i n s outhern B ritain a re e nclosures a nd b arrows
4 .1
( Whittle 1 977,
T he n eolithic l andscape a nd i ts t ransformation P ost-depositional
p reservation 1 66),
a nd
a nd c an
p rocesses
v isibility b e
d ivided
h ave
a ffected
t he
o f p ast m aterial r emains i nto
b iological,
d egree
o f
s lope,
i nfluencing
t he
S ites
a nd e ffect ( Fig.
4 .1).
O n
c halk
b edrocks,
1 981,
4 .1).
p ost-depositional
a nd
R elief, f actors p rocesses
4 .1). s usceptible
d ispersed o r c ompletely d estroyed i t
h as
b een
s uggested
t hat
e xtent,
r esulting
s olution
i n
( Atkinson 1 957,
2 29).
P loughing a nd,
s oil c reep a re t he m ain a gents o f e rosion o n p ositive l ynchet a ccumulations a gainst
t o
( 1983b,
1 47)
v alleys
o n
a nd
1 8
t he
S outh D owns i n S ussex a nd
s ince
e ast
H ampshire
a nd,
t he c ross-sectional a rea o f c olluvium b y t he l ength c m.
B ell
e xcavated f our t renches t hrough c olluvial d eposits i n d ry
c ontributing s lope, a nd
a
s lopes,
f encelines
c olluvial d eposits o n l ower v alley s lopes a nd i n v alley b ottoms.
d ividing
t o
( Fig.
h as l owered t he s urface o f t he g round b y a s m uch a s 5 0 c m.
t he l ast 4 000 y ears
l esser
o f
s ituated o n u pper s lopes a re p articularly
a nd c an b e d amaged,
w eathering
( Foley
a spect a nd d rainage a re p robably t he m ain n ature
a cting o n t he l andscape
e rosion
d istribution,
g eomorphological
p rocesses i nvolving h uman a gency ( summarized i n T able
i n
3 3).
o f
b y t he
h as a rrived a t m inimum f igures o f b etween 2 .5 c m.
f or t he d epth o f e roded s oil o n t he u pper v alley
t he n eolithic p eriod.
I t c ould b e a rgued t hat
t hese
s lopes f igures
u nderestimate t he d egree o f s oil d epletion, a s t hey i gnore t he l oss o f m aterial b y s olution a nd t he m ovement o f s ediment d own t he v alley a xis ( Bell 1 983b, m odern
1 47).
p loughing,
l oss o f 3 0-40 c m.
M ercer
( 1980,
2 3),
f or e xample,
o f t he o riginal n eolithic l and s urface a t t he
c ausewayed e nclosure a t H ambledon H ill, b e
h as e stimated t hat
h illslope e rosion a nd s olution h as r esulted i n t he D orset.
C onversely,
m ain
i t s hould
p ointed o ut t hat s oil p its d ug i n t he v alley b ottoms e lsewhere
s outhern E ngland,
a round S tonehenge i n W iltshire, c olluvium ( Bell 1 983b, 1 47). s ignificantly g reater s olution v alley
i n
f or e xample i n t he L ambourn v alley i n B erkshire a nd h ave y ielded i nsignificant d eposits o f A s t here i s n o r eason t o s uppose a a nd m ovement o f m aterial d own t he
a xis t han i n t he c ases c ited a bove,
-28 -
t his s uggests t hat
o ther
c d
•
O
•H
• H
7 1 4 ) •
•
• r I
c a 0
a ) a )
l ) rd
c d
3 r z i
c d
• c t i f a ) • • H 0 • H " 4 -)
c d cd
O 4 3 4 ) •
c d c d ' c d
0 Q U )
c d
c d
P
a ) 3 r c c d r —I
c d O bO
Hc d c o 4 1
c d f I C e O • H
E
c d O
4 )
W
C I )
0
O
H
4 )
r I 0 W
O C f )
W
c d r 1 H
B IOLOGICAL
G EOMORPHOLOGICAL
c r i
C c )
- 2 9
4 -)
c d 3
c d
P ROCESSES
• r I f i O C f , X ( 1 . )
; 4 W
-
c onstruction
c d cd
c d H
m ineral e xtraction
0 • H t e 4 -)
s lope c reep a nd
a )c d
rd
r oot d isturbance
o sitional r ocesses p reservation a nd v isibilit
a nimal a nd e arthworm d isturbance
• C I ) O f 1 C I )
d isplacement
d estruction
d isplacement c d
EROS I ON
COLLUV IAT I ON
ALLUV IAT ION
K ey :
b u i ld ing p i t/pos t-ho le a r tefac ts
F igure 4 .1 T he n ature a nd e ffect o f p ost-depositional p rocesses a cting o n t he l andscape:
A ,
t he s ituation i n t he n eolithic p eriod;
B ,
t he
s ituation i n t he m id-20th c entury b efore p loughing; C , t he t runcation o f a rchaeological r emains b y d eep p loughing. A fter T hrane 1 981.
- 3 0 -
d ownland
a reas h ave n ot s uffered t he s ame i ntensity o f e rosion a s t he
c halklands a long t he s outh c oast. H owever, i n p laces w here t here a re s ubstantial d eposits o f c olluvium a nd a lluvium, n eolithic s ites c an b ecome b uried a nd t hus p rotected f rom e rosion, f or e xample t he l ater n eolithic s ite a t O tford,
o n
K ent
( Pyke 1 980;
1 981).
E rosion h as b een s evere n ot o nly o n c alcareous b edrocks, b ut a lso a djacent p lateaux a nd c lay v ales. I n t he W eald, s ubstantial
v olumes o f s ediments o ccur i n s ome o f t he r iver v alleys d raining t his a rea o f c lay a nd s andstone l ithography, f or e xample t he O use a nd C uckmere, E ast S ussex ( Scaife a nd B urrin 1 983; 1 985). A lthough t he d ating e vidence f or t he a ccumulation o f t hese a lluvial d eposits i s, a t p resent, b ased s olely o n p ollen d ata, i t i s s uggested t hat a lluviation h ad b egun b y t he B oreal p eriod a nd w as p articularly e xtensive i n t he n eolithic p eriod a nd B ronze A ge w hen h uman a ctivity l ed t o v alley s ide s oil e rosion ( Scaife a nd B urrin 1 985,
3 2-3).
A lthough p loughing t runcates i n s itu a rchaeological d eposits a nd s ubsoil f eatures ( Fig. 4 .1C), i t c an e nhance t he v isibility o f a rchaeological s ites b y d ispersing t he a rtefacts a ssociated w ith t hese c ontexts t hroughout t he p loughsoil o r b y c onflating t he a rtefacts o f s everal l ayers ( Haselgrove e t a l. 1 985). I n c ases o f d rastic h illslope 2 e rosion, s ome d egree o f d isplacement d ownslope c an b e e xpected; c e tainly, a rtefacts a re e ncountered i n c olluvial d eposits ( Bell 1 983b). J H owever, t his i s o nly l ikely t o t ake p lace o n s lopes w here t here i s s ignificant s oil c reep ( Haselgrove 1 985, 8 ). R ecent f ieldwork i n W est S ussex s hows t hat e ven o n w est-, s outh- a nd e astf acing s lopes o f g radients u p t o 1 :6, t here h as b een l imited l ateral a nd d ownhill d isplacement o f f lintwork a ssociated w ith w orking f loors a t t he n eolithic f lint-mining c entres a t H arrow H ill, L ong D own a nd C hurch H ill, f orthcoming
F indon, d espite a nnual p loughing i n r ecent y ears ( Holgate a ). T hus a rtefacts b rought t o t he s urface o f c ultivated
l and a re u nlikely, b y p loughing a nd s oil c reep a lone, 4 t o t ravel f ar f rom t he p lace w here t hey w ere o riginally d eposited; i n f act m ost o f t he a rtefacts p loughed u p f rom n eolithic s ites o n h ill t ops a nd u pper v alley s lopes o scillate i n t he p loughsoil i n t he v icinity p lace o f d eposition.
4 .2
o f
t heir
T he c haracter o f n eolithic d omestic s ites
T he l andscape i n t he l owland z one i n B ritain h as c hanged s ince t he n eolithic p eriod w ith t he e ffect t hat o nly m onuments a nd a f ew w ell-protected d omestic s tructures h ave s urvived i n a r ecognizable f orm. I n t he h ighland z one, r ectangular t imber h ouses w ith i nternal h earths h ave s urvived o n d omestic s ites w hich h ave n ot b een s ubjected t o i ntensive m echanized p loughing ( Piggott 1 954, 3 2-5; S mith 1 974, 1 04; W hittle 1 977, 4 6-8; M egaw a nd S impson 1 979, 8 5-6). I n s ome c ases, s tone f ootings a long t he l ine o f t he o uter w alls h ave h elped t o p reserve t races o f p ost h oles, f or e xample a t H alden H ill, D evon ( Willock 1 936). T imber b uildings h ave b een l ocated i n t he l owland z one, p reserved e ither u nder c hambered c airns a nd l ong b arrows, f or e xample H azelton I I, G los. ( Saville 1 984a, 1 9), o r i n a reas t hat h ave n ever b een s ubjected t o p loughing o r h illslope e rosion, f or e xample C rickley H ill, G los. ( Dixon 1 981, 1 45) a nd F engate, C ambs. ( Pryor 1 974;
1 978,
7 -10).
' mortuary h ouses',
I t i s c lear t hat s ome o f t hese s tructures
f or e xample N uthane,
-31 -
H ants.
( Morgan 1 959,
a re
2 0-2),
a nd t he r ectangular b uilding a t p reted a s a f orm o f ' cult h ouse'. A part f rom h ouses, a nd
5F engate,
d eposition.
3 15).
p its
W hittle
u ndulations
d omestic
f ormation p rocesses
E xcept w here a rtefacts a re b rought t o
t he s urface t hrough d isturbance, s urface
1 04-5;
I norganic m aterials a re s oon c ompacted o n t he o ld g round
a nd g radually b ecome c overed t hrough s oil
( Clark a nd K washina 1 981,
w here
( Smith 1 974,
M egaw a nd S impson 1 979 , 8 5-7). U nless a naerobic c onditions m ost o f t he o rganic r emains s tart t o d ecompose s oon a fter
p revail, s urface
i s a lso b est i nter-
d omestic s ites c onsist o f w orking a reas,
m iddens c ontaining d omestic r efuse
1 977, 4 6 ;
C ambs.
t here w ill n ever b e a ny
d istinctive
o r s oil m arks t o s uggest t he p resence
f eatures.
T hus i n t he l owland z one,
o f
t he g round h as b een d isturbed a nd t he b ase o f p its o r
s catters
a re
e xposed,
f or
d isturbance o r p loughing, b e d iscovered.
e xample b y
t hese
i t i s o nly i n
m ineral
p laces a rtefact
e xtraction,
a nimal
t hat n eolithic d omestic s ites a re l ikely t o
I n a ddition,
n eolithic p ottery w as o riginally f ired a t
l ow t emperatures a nd i n B ritain i t b egins t o d istintegrate o n e xposure t o n atural w eathering a gencies. t herefore a ctivity.
o ften
E xcavations f eatures
C oncentrations o f s tone a rtefacts a re
t he o nly s urface i ndications o f
n eolithic
o f s urface a rtefact s catters s eldom p roduce
o ther t han t he r emains o f p its a nd p ossibly t he
p ostholes.
T he
s ite
a t H urst F en,
d omestic
s ubsoil
d eepest
S uffolk w as r ecognised
b y
o f t he
p resence o f e arlier n eolithic p ottery a nd f lintwork i n t he u pcast f rom r abbit
h oles
e xcavated
( Clark
( c.
e t a l.,
1 9 0
1 5,000 m .
) ,
w as
t hen
b ut t he o nly s ubsoil c ontexts t hat
2 03).
w ere
l ocated c onsisted o f a s eries o f p it-bases, a nd
a
s hort l ength o f d itch.
c oncluded:
A s C lark
A l arge
a rea
a f ew p ossible p ost h oles
( Clark
e t
a l.
1 960 ,
" the H urst F en s ite e vidently r epresents a s ettlement,
l ittle d efinite i nformation i s a vailable e ither a bout t he s ize o f
2 41) b ut t he
c ommunity o r a bout t he c haracter o f t he s tructures i n w hich t he p eople l ived".
S outh
o f
R obin H ood's B all c ausewayed
e nclosure,
W ilts.,
e xcavations o f a n e arlier n eolithic a rtefact s catter c ollected a fter a f ield
p rotected a s a S ite o f S pecial S cientific I nterest w as p loughed
b y a ccident y ielded s everal s mall p its,
b ut t hese w ere n ot l ocated i n
p laces 6 w here t here w ere d ense a rtefact c oncentrations i n t he s oil.
T his i s t o b e e xpected;
p lough-
t he d iscussion i n C hapter 5 o f
t he
w ay i n w hich p resent-day s tone-using s ocieties m aintain t heir d omestic s ites
s uggests t hat l iving a nd w orking a reas w ere k ept c lean a nd m ost
r ubbish a round
w as t hrown o nto m iddens o r d umped i nto d isused t he p eriphery o f l iving a nd w orking a reas.
s torage
p its
A lthough a rtefact
s catters c an b e r elated t o l iving a reas, t here i s n o s imple c orrelation b etween t opsoil a rtefact s catters a nd i ndividual h ouses o r p its
( Binford e t a l. A rtefact
a re
l ikely
7 0-1).
s catters b rought t o t he s urface b y
g round
d isturbance
t o b e t he o nly r ecognisable t races o f n eolithic
d omestic
s ites, o ther t han d eeply-buried s ites, t o s urvive t he p ostd epositional p rocesses t hat h ave b een a cting o n t he l andscape i n t he l owland z one i n B ritain.
O nce t hese a rtefact s catters b ecome e xposed
t o
f lintwork i s l ikely t o r emain a s
w eathering
a gencies,
t he
o nly
r eadily i dentifiable c omponent. S urface c ollection s urveys t o l ocate a nd r ecover f lint s catters p rovide t he b est m ethod f or r ecording t he p resence o f d omestic a ctivity. t he
I t i s p erhaps i ronic t hat p loughing o n
o ne h and s hould d estroy n eolithic d omestic s ites a nd o n t he o ther
-3 2 -
e nhance t heir v isibility. T his h as b ecome p articularly a cute i n t he s econd h alf o f t he 2 0th c entury w ith i ncreased m echanization a nd d eep p loughing,
f ollowed b y t he l ate 1 960s e xpansion i n t he a creage
c ultivation
( Lambrick
1 977).
T hus t he s tudy o f n eolithic
a ctivity i n s outhern B ritain i s e ssentially t he s tudy r ecovered l argely f rom t he p loughsoil.
u nder
d omestic
o f
f lintwork
F ootnotes 1 .
E arly
n eolithic
c entral
( Bandkeramik)
t wo m ain r easons: t he
l ong h ouses o n t he l oess s oils
a nd n orth-west E urope a re a rchaeologically
h ouses
f irst,
o f
v isible
f or
t he s ubstantial p osts u sed t o c onstruct
r equired l arge p ost h oles;
a nd s econd,
p its
w ere
o ften d ug a longside t hese h ouses t o p rovide d aub f or s mearing t he
h ouse
w alls.
T hese s ites c an t hus b e d etected
e asily b y a erial p hotography, f or e xample t he s ite a t S tadt R egensburg i n W est G ermany ( Braasch 1 984, 1 34). 2 .
o n
r elatively H arting,
P aper d elivered b y P eter C lack a t t he s ession o n ' Theory a nd m ethod i n f ield s urvey d esign' a t t he f ourth a nnual c onference o f t he
T heoretical
A rchaeology
G roup a t
D urham,
D ecember
1 982,
e ntitled " The s cum r ises t o t he s urface a nd w anders".
3 .
T he
m ajority
p ositive f ragments
o f
a rtefacts
f ound
i n
c olluvial
l ynchet a ccumulations c onsist o f p ottery ( Bell 1 983b, 1 21;
d eposits
o f s mall, C lark 1 982,
a nd
a braded 1 7-18;
M ercer q uoted i n C rowther e t a l. 1 985, 6 5-7). A s w ith t he l oad o f a r iver, i t i s l ikely t hat s maller a nd l ighter a rtefacts, f or e xample
p otsherds
d eposited a s a r esult o f
m anuring
o n
u pper
s lopes f rom t he l ate I ron A ge o nwards, w ill h ave a g reater c hance o f
m oving d ownslope w ith h illwash a nd t hus b ecoming i ncorporated
w ithin c olluvium i n v alley b ottoms. O ne o f B ell's v alley b ottom t renches, a t K iln C ombe n ear E astbourne i n E ast S ussex, w as 1 .5 k m. D own
w est o f a n e xtensive l ater n eolithic d omestic s ite s ite
2 0)
( Bullock
s ituated a long a r idge w ith a 1 :20 s lope
4 -6).
h ead o f t he d ry v alley ( Drewett 1 982,
a t
t he
A lthough t he l ater
n eolithic s ite h as b een p loughed i ntermittently s ince t he N apoleonic W ar, s ample e xcavations h ave l ocated P eterborough W are o n
t he
( Drewett m icrowear
s urface
o f t he C lay-with-flints
1 982,
4 9;
H olgate
u nder
f orthcoming
t he
b ).
p loughsoil F urthermore,
a nalysis o f f lint i mplements f rom t he s urface
o f
t he
C lay-with-flints a nd t he m odern p loughsoil r evealed f ew t races o f p ost-depositional s urface m odification, n ot
s howing t hat t hese f lint
a rtefacts
h ave
m oved f ar f rom t he p lace
d eposited
i n t he n eolithic p eriod ( Grace i n H olgate
w here
t hey
w ere
f orthcoming
b ). 4 .
A n e xperiment t o t est t he m ovement o f a rtefacts i n t he p loughsoil w as
c onducted
b y
A lison
B etts a s
p art
o f
a n
u ndergraduate
d issertation s ubmitted t o t he U niversity o f L ondon ( 1977). P art o f a f ield a t B ullock D own, E ast S ussex w as s eeded w ith a n umber o f f lints w hich h ad b een p ainted g reen. a ctivity I t u p
A fter a y ear o f f arming
t he f lints w ere r ecovered a nd t heir f indspots r ecorded.
w as s hown t hat a n umber o f f lints h ad t ravelled d istances t o 5 0 m . f rom w here t hey h ad b een p lanted. H owever, I
i nformed
( Greg W oolf p ers.
c omm.)
-3 -
t hat o ne o f t he
r easons
o f a m f or
t his i s t hat v olunteers o n a n a rchaeological e xcavation t hat t ook p lace o n
c lose t o t he f ield u sed t o p ick u p a nd t hrow t hese
t heir
r eturn f rom t he p ub a t l unchtimes,
t hus
f lints
( partially!)
i nvalidating t he e xperiment.
5 .
T he
s tructure
t rench
8 .5
s tructures,
a t
i t
a
l imited
i mplements s tructure; b .c. B y
a nalogy
r ange
s hallow
n eolithic h earth.
o f i mplement t ypes a nd
d ebitage
t wo
a
o ther
n ot h ave a n i nternal
w as
c harcoal
f ound
i n
a
F inely-made
( Ga K -41967)
( Kjaerum 1 966),
i n
D enmark,
a nd t he
' cult h ouse'
A rchaeology
a t t he s ixth a nnual c onference o f G roup
a t C ambridge,
h olding-pattern-plough
o f t his
z one
i t
t he
D ecember 1 984,
i nvestigation i n
S tonehenge".
-3 4 -
6 4
t he
f or
r estricted
a s o pposed t o a
P aper d elivered b y J ulian R ichards a t t he s ession o n a rchaeology '
r atio w ith
( Pryor 1 9787 7).
o f o bjects a ssociated w ith t hese s tructures, a f orm o f
c onsisting
h igh
a ssociation
w ith t he s imilar-sized s tructures
a s
b edding d omestic
s amples g ave 0 -14 d ates o f 3 010 +
a nd 2 445 + 5 0 b .c.
T ustrup a nd F erslev
i nterpreted h ouse.
6 .
t o
u nlike
a j et b ead a nd a f lint a ssemblage
r ange
( Ga K -4196)
e xample
i n s ize;
d id
c arinated p ottery, o f
F engate w as p reserved a s
x 7m .
i s
b est
d omestic
' Plough-zone T heoretical
e ntitled e nvirons
" The o f
5 .
C hapter
F lint
a rtefacts
T he s tudy o f f lint a ssemblages.
a re t he m ost r esilient a nd e asily
r ecognisable
c omponent r esulting f rom d omestic a ctivity i n t he 5 th - 3 rd b .c.
T his
m illennia
c hapter i s c oncerned w ith t he i dentification a nd s tudy o f
d omestic f lint a ssemblages.
5 .1
T he u se o f s tone a rtefacts b y c ontemporary s tone-using s ocieties A nthropological
w ith a nd
a nd e thnographic l iterature i s r arely
d escribing t he r ole w hich s tone t echnology p lays s ubsistence p ractices
h owever,
( B.
C ranstone p ers.
s ettlement
c omm.).
T here
a re,
e thnoarchaeological s tudies o f h ow p resent-day s ocieties u se
a nd d ispose o f s tone a rtefacts s tudies
( e.g.
B inford 1 978;
a re o f h unter-gathering s ocieties,
r elate
c oncerned
i n
t o
f ormation
f arming
s ocieties.
p rocesses
t hat
G ould 1 980).
b ut t here a re s ome
T hese p rovide a n i nsight
i s
o f
r elevance
t o
t he
M ost w hich
i nto
s ite
d efinition
o f
m esolithic a nd n eolithic d omestic s ites.
5 .1(i)
T he c omposition o f s tone a rtefact a ssemblages
G ould u sed
b y
( 1980)
f ound t hat o ver
9 9% of t he t otal
t he g roup o f A ustralian A borigines h e
s tone
s tudied
m aterials
o ccurred
i n
t ask-specific l ocalities t hat w ere e phemeral a nd w idely d ispersed o ver t he l andscape. H owever, w hile l ess t han 1 % o f t otal s tone m aterials w ere
u sed
t ypes
o n a h abitation b ase c amp,
w ithin
t his c ontext
t he w idest r ange
o f
a rtefact
t he t otal s tone a ssemblage w as u sed a nd d isposed o f ( Gould 1 980,
1 32).
H itchcock's s tudy ( 1980,
B otswana B ushmen s howed t hat a s a g roup b ecame m ore s edentary, g reater
i n
3 02) o f t he
r ange o f a ctivities a nd a n i ncrease i n s pecialized
b oth a
i mplement
t ypes w ere i n e vidence a t d omestic s ites. F arming s ettlements a re t hus l ikely t o y ield a s imilar v ariety o f s pecialized i mplement t ypes; a nd
t he m ore s edentary t he g roup,
t he g reater t he q uantity o f
t otal
s tone m aterial t o b e f ound i n d omestic s ites.
5 .1(ii)
R ubbish d isposal
E xcept i n t he c ase o f a c atastrophe,
f ew s erviceable o bjects a re
l eft b ehind w hen a d omestic s ite i s a bandoned ( Hodder 1 982, t he
r ubbish
d isposal,
r emains. t wo
p ermanently
c onclusions
o ccupied
5 6):
I n M urray's g eneral s urvey ( 1980) o f f or
w ere
r eached.
m ore t han o ne
O n
s eason,
s ites t he
o nly
r ubbish
t hat r ubbish
w ere t hat
a ccumulated w hile c arrying o ut v arious t asks w as n ot a bandoned a t t he p lace w here t hese t asks w ere p erformed. O n t he o ther h and, h owever, r ubbish s eason
w as
l eft w here i t f ell o n s ites o ccupied f or l ess
( Murray 1 980,
4 97).
T hus a lthough d iscrete
t han
a ctivity
c ould b e d iscerned o n h unter-gatherer o r s hort-stay s ites,
o ne a reas
t hey c ould
n ot b e d etected o n s edentary s ites w here h ouses a nd w ork a reas w ere k ept c lean a nd r ubbish w as d eposited e lsewhere ( Murray 1 980, 4 97). T his e vidence t hus s uggests t hat a r ange o f a ctivities i s p ractised a t p ermanently o ccupied d omestic s ites, b ut t he d ebris f rom t hese t asks i s d umped a way f rom w ork a reas:
-3 5 -
e ither a t s pecific p laces
w ithin C annon a nd
t he d omestic s ite o r o ff t he s ite a ltogether. ( 1983, 1 19) c oncluded t hat i n t he M aya H ighlands,
H ayden a nd e ffort, v alue
h indrance w ere t he t hree m ain f actors d etermining h ow r ubbish
s orted a nd w here i t i s d umped. m aterials d ebris)
( e.g. f rom
g lass: a reas
i s
S pecial e ffort i s m ade t o r emove s harp
p erhaps r elevant t o a c onsideration o f f lint
f requently u sed
( Hayden a nd
C annon
1 983,
1 59),
t hough n ot n ecessarily t o d eposit i t c lose t o t he s urfaces w here t hese m aterials
w ere u sed ( ibid.,
1 53-4).
U ltimately,
e ither i n a reas s urrounding s tructures o r
i n
d isused s torage p its
c onclude t he
t hat
( ibid.,
1 40).
O n
t his
1 983,
1 26)
s ubject,
t hey
" refuse i n n on u rban c ommunities i s l ikely t o r emain i n
i mmediate n eighbourhood,
o rigin"
r ubbish i s d umped
( Hayden a nd C annon
i .e.
( Haydon a nd C annon 1 983,
w ithin a t wo-minute w alk
1 59).
a nd K washina 1 981,
s howing
t he
3 16-17)
a nd t he L ozi
( Hodder 1 982,
w ork
f or e xample t he F ulani
1 21),
4 11 a nd 4 13;
a nd e xamination o f s ettlement p lans
l ocation o f r ubbish d isposal a reas a nd
f arming s ocieties i n A frica,
i ts
T his c onclusion i s s upported
b y s tudies o f s kin d ressers i n E thiopia ( Gallagher 1 977, C lark
o f
a reas
f or
( David 1 971,
1 13)
w here a ll r ubbish i s d umped e ither o n
m iddens o r i n p its l ocated o n t he p eriphery o f l iving a nd w ork a reas. I f a round
r ubbish t he
i s d umped i n d iscrete a reas w ithin t he
e dge
o f
d omestic s ites,
t hen
t hese
r ecognizable b y c oncentrations o f d iscarded m aterial. n ot
b e
H owever,
i t i s f rom
H atchery W est,
c ollection
I llinois
s urvey
w as
a s e xemplified b y B inford's f ieldwork
( Binford e t a l.
s howed
m aterial a nd h ouse s tructures
t here
a ppearing A lthough s ite,
H ere a a nd
s urface d iscrete
S ubsequent e xcavation,
t hat t here w as l ittle c orrespondence b etween a reas o f
d ensity T hus
1 970).
c onducted o ver a d omestic s ite
a rtefact c oncentrations w ere r ecorded.
5 .1
o r
s hould
e asy w ithin t his t o i dentify s pecific l iving a nd w ork a reas
s urface a rtefact s preads a lone, a t
c onfines
s ites
a re
' reservoirs'
( Binford e t
o f a rchaeological
a l.
1 970,
m aterial
d o n ot r elate t o t he l ocation o f
7 0-1).
p otentially
o n t he s urface o f d omestic s ites w hen t hese a re t hese
t hough, h ighest
d isturbed.
s tructures
o n
t he
t hey a t l east e nable d omestic s ites t o b e d iscovered.
( iii)
T he u se a nd d isposal o f s tone a rtefacts
T wo
s tudies
i nformative
o f
E thiopian
( Gallagher 1 977;
s kin
d ressers
u sed a s t he r aw m aterial f or m aking s crapers, h ides.
a re
p articularly
C lark a nd K washina 1 981).
O bsidian i s
w hich a re u sed t o c lean
T he o bsidian i s e xtracted a t q uarry s ites;
c ore r eduction a nd
t rimming o f f lakes t akes p lace a t t he q uarry t o m inimise t he w eight t o b e
c arried,
l eaving
( Gallagher 1 977, s ites,
w here
b asket
o r p ot,
e ither
s pecially-dug
o bsidian
o f
d ebitage
p its
4 10-11;
o r
o n
a nd d isposed o f
p iles
s ection
c lose
C lark a nd K washina 1 981,
i s l eft i n l iving o r w ork a reas,
K washina 1 977, 5 .1(ii)
t hese
l ocalities
A ll d ebitage i s d ropped i nto
n ever o nto t he f loor,
f ooted a nd w ould r isk c utting t heir f eet a nd
a t
S crapers a re t hen m anufactured a t t he d omestic
t he s kins a re w orked.
( Gallagher 1 977, n o
q uantities
4 08).
3 14;
a bove).
c f.
t o
c arefully t he
w ork
3 08).
a rea
P ractically
a s e veryone
( Gallagher 1 977,
i s
b are-
4 11;
C lark
t he r emarks o n t he M aya H ighlands
S crapers
a re
t he o nly
a i n
i mplement
t o
i n b e
m anufactured, t hough f resh f lakes a re u sed f or s having a nd n ail c utting ( Gallagher 1 977, 4 12). D uring u se, s crapers a re c ontinuously r esharpened h our:
( the s craping e dge i s r educed a t a r ate o f o ver 1 c m.
G allagher
1 977,
4 11)
a nd a re d isposed o f w hen
-3 6 -
t hey
p er
b ecome
i nconvenient t o u se. s crapers, i s d umped ( Gallagher 1 977,
A ll o bsidian d ebris, a round t he e dge o f
4 13 ;
( 1977,
4 08 a nd 4 12)
b elong
t o
t hree
b oth d ebitage a nd u sed l iving a nd w ork a reas
C lark a nd K washina 1 981,
3 16-17).
G allagher
m akes t he p oint t hat t he s kin d ressers h e s tudied
e thnic g roups:
i n a ll c ases,
t he s ame
t ypes
i mplement a re m anufactured u sing t he s ame t echniques a nd
s tyle;
a ll
a nd
s kin
d ressers
d isposal. b y
a dopt
t he s ame p attern o f
w orking
D omestic s ites c an t herefore b e d etected
a lso
i ndicate t hat t hey a re f unctionally-specific
( Gallagher 1 977,
4 14).
H owever,
s crapers, s ettlements
t here a re n o s tylistic v ariations i n
t he w orking o f o bsidian t hat a ct a s s ymbolic e xpressions g roup i dentity. E thiopian
r ubbish
a rchaeologically
t he p resence o f c oncentrations o f o bsidian d ebitage a nd
w hich
o f
e thnic
s kin-dressers p roduce a l imited r ange o f d ebitage
i mplement t ypes;
o f a nd
a nd
t hese a rtefacts a re u ltimately d eposited w ithin t he
c onfines o f t he d omestic s ite. D ebitage a nd i mplements w ere d isposed o f t ogether a t t he L angweiler 8 B andkeramik s ettlement i n t he A ldenhovener P latte, a nd
c ore
f ound
H owever,
w hen
i mplements, d egree
t o
s carcity
( de
G rooth
d isposal
2 42).
A s cale o f
' value'
r aw
1 17).
r ange
o f i ndividual i tems i s i nfluenced
b y
o f t he
( "curated":
c an b e a ssigned t o a n a rtefact
t he a mount o f e nergy e xpended
o f
s craper
1 981,
w hich s pecific i mplements a re r etained i n u se
B inford 1 973, r elated
a s s hown b y t he r efitted
i n t he s ame p it
d ealing w ith t ool k its c ontaining a g reater
t he
t o
W est G ermany,
t ogether
i n
materials i nvolved a nd a ny
i mportance t hat m ight b e a ssociated w ith i t
i ts
m anufacture,
s ymbolic
( Moore
o r
1 982,
t he
r eligious
7 6).
C ertain
i mplements, f or o ne o r o ther o f t hese r easons, a re c arried a round i n a nticipation o f u se. T hese i mplements t herefore h ave a r elatively l ong
l ife
a nd
t he
p lace
o f
t heir
u ltimate
d isposal
w ill
n ecessarily r eflect t he r ange o f a ctivities f or w hich t hey w ere T hus
a
k ind
o f f iltering p rocess t akes p lace b efore
d iscarded
( cf.
a bove).
T here
d eposition
i s
t hus
i mpossible t o i dentify t he a rtefacts e arly
m aterials
t he r emarks o n t he M aya H ighlands i n s ection n o
a nd a ctivity a reas
s imple ( Moore
r elationship 1 982,
7 5)
b etween
r ubbish b e
f ull r ange o f a ctivities p ractised f rom t he
t hat h ave b een a bandoned o n a s ite. J utland,
a re
5 .1(ii)
a nd i t w ill o ften F or e xample,
n eolithic d omestic s ite p reserved u nder a n e arthen l ong
a t M osegärden,
n ot u sed.
a t
t he
b arrow
D enmark a n umber o f p ossible w ork a reas a nd a
d ump w ere l ocated ( Madsen a nd J uel J ensen 1 982;
M adsen a nd
P etersen
1 983).
M icroscopic e xamination o f t he u se-wear p atterns o n t he e dges
o f
i mplements
a ll
w as c arried o ut.
N o s ignificant t rends
d istribution o f d ifferent u se-wear t ypes w ere r evealed, f act
t hat
d ump,
m ost
t he
o f t he u nused i mplements o ccurred i n o r
a round
t he
m aking i t h ard t o g ive a ny s atisfying a ccount o f t he a ctivities
p erformed o n d ifferent p arts o f t he s ite 7 6).
5 .1(iv)
I t
i n
o ther t han t he
( Madsen a nd J uel J ensen 1 982,
D iscussion
T he e xamples q uoted a bove c ome f rom a r ange o f s ocial c ontexts. c ould b e a rgued t hat i t i s i mpossible t o s eek g eneral r ules
r egarding t he m anufacture, u se a nd d isposal o f s tone a rtefacts, a nd t hat t hese c oncerns a re c onditioned b y s ocial c ontext ( Hodder 1 982, 2 15-16). H owever, G allagher ( 1977, 4 12) h as s hown t hat i n t he c ase o f E thiopian
s kin-dressers,
s tone t echnology i s r elated t o
-3 7 -
s ubsistence
p ractices a nd n ot m embership o f a n e thnic g roup. a lso
O ther s tudies
s hown t hat s tone t echnology r eflects s ettlement a nd
p atterns
( e.g.
B rose 1 978),
a nd t hat s tylistic v ariations i n
i mplements a re c omplementary t o f unction ( Sackett T he s hows
h ave
s ubsistence s tone
1 982).
s tudy o f t he r esidues o f c ontemporary s tone-using
s ocieties
t hat d iscarded m aterials a re c ommonly d umped a djacent t o l iving
a reas.
S harp m aterials,
d omestic s ites,
f or e xample o bsidian,
g lass a nd f lint u sed o n
a re u sually d isposed o f c arefully w ithin t he c onfines
o f t hese s ite. T his p ractice h as b een r ecorded a t n eolithic s ites e xcavated r ecently i n t he n orth w est p art o f t he C ambridgeshire F ens; h ere,
f lint d ebris h ad b een d isposed o f o n-site,
o ther m aterials w ere r edeposited o ff-site s urface e ven
f lint s catters c an i ndicate t he p resence o f
i f
t here
i s
n o s imple c orrelation
s catters a nd i ndividual h ouses o r p its F urthermore, a ctivities t hus
i t
i s
t hat
d ifficult
t o
b etween
t opsoil
( see C hapter 4 ,
r econstruct
6 5).
T hus
d omestic
s ites, a rtefact
s ection
t he
f ull
4 .2).
r ange
o f
t ook p lace o n a s ite f rom s tone a rtefacts a lone
a nd
i dentify b oth i ntra- a nd i nter-site d ifferences i n f unction
a nd
s tatus.
N evertheless s tone a rtefact m anufacture,
r elated
t o
r ecognise
s ubsistence b oth
p ractices,
a nd i t
T he
a bove
a rtefacts, t he
s ection
w ill
s ection
b y
t he
r ange
a ssemblages b y
b e
p ossible s ites,
t o f or
s uggests
f lint a ssemblages t hat
f arming
s ettlements
p resence o f c onsiderable q uantities
o f
a re s tone
i ncluding a h igh p roportion a nd v ariety o f i mplements t hat
r eflect
r ecord
s hould
f rom s tone a ssemblages.
T he c haracterization o f d omestic
c haracterized
u se a nd d isposal i s
d omestic s ites a nd c ertain t ask-specific
e xample q uarries,
5 .2
w hereas p ottery a nd
( Crowther 1 985,
o f a ctivities p erformed
i nvestigate a nd
t he d egree o f
o n
t hese
a ssociation
s ite f unction a s o bservable
i n
t he
s ites.
T his
b etween
f lint
a rchaeological
s tudying f lint a ssemblages r ecovered f rom a
s election
o f
e xcavated n eolithic s ites i n s outhern B ritain.
5 .2(i)
D efinitions o f f lint a rtefact c ategories
A s
a
p reliminary
t o
a n a nalysis
o f
f lint
a ssemblages
f rom
n eolithic s ites i n s outhern B ritain, i t i s n ecessary t o d efine f lint a rtefact c ategories u sed i n t he s tudy ( Figs. 5 .1 a nd 5 .2). 1 )
D ebitage. r emovals o f
D ebris ( flakes,
r esulting b lades,
f rom 2
b ladelets
f laking
r aw m aterial f rom w hich r emovals h ave b een
5 .1: p ieces
n os.
1 ,
2 ,
1 9,
f lint,
a nd c hips),
2 0 a nd 2 3-27)
c ores
i ncluding ( the b lock
d etached :
a nd r ough w aste
it he
F ig.
( shattered
w hich d o n ot d isplay t he d istinctive c haracteristics o f a
c onchoidal f lint).
f racture,
b ut
n onetheless
r esulting
f rom
f laking
2 )
I mplement o r t ool. R emoval o r c ore w hich h as s ubsequently r etouched o r u tilized.
3 )
C ore
t ablet.
D isc-shaped
c onsists o f a n e ntire,
f lake,
t he d orsal s urface o f
p reviously w orked s triking p latform,
- 3 8 -
b een
w hich w hich
LATER
MESOL ITH IC
FL INTVVORK
3
5 cm
0 1-
7
6
8( i l
9
1 0
1
-, 1
1 2
1 3
1 4
1 5
1 6
1 8
5 cm
EARL IER
NEOL ITH IC
DEB ITAGE
5 cm
LATER
NE OL ITH IC
DEB ITAGE
0
5 cm
F igure 5 .1 L ater m esolithic f lintwork: t ablet; 7 -18, b lade
4 ,
1 -2,
t ranchet a xe-sharpening f lake;
b ladelet c ores;
5 , burin;
3 ,
c ore
6 , m icroburin;
n arrow b lade m icroliths. E arlier n eolithic d ebitage: 1 9-20, c ores; 2 1-22, c ore r ejuvenation f lakes. L ater n eolithic
d ebitage:
2 3-?7,
f lake c ores.
-3 9 -
NE OL ITH IC
FL INT
I MPLE MENTS
n o tched
s crapers o
I - I
I I
f l ake
5c m I 1
(
I
Z Z Z2
o va te
m icrodent icu la tes
k n ives
-
f abr icator r od
1 5
2 1
2 0
g round-edged
a rrowheads F igure 5 .2 N eolithic
f lint i mplements:
f lake;
6 -7 p iercers;
k nives;
1 3,
r od;
s haped a rrowhead; a rrowhead;
1 9,
1 4,
8 ,
-
o vate;
f abricator;
_
k n i fe
1 -4, s crapers; 5 , n otched 0, m icrodenticulates; 1 1-12, 9 -1
1 5,
g round-edged k nife;
1 6,
l eaf-
rrowhead; 1 8, p etit t ranchet l ozenge-shaped a blique a rrowhead; 2 1, b arbed c hisel a rrowhead; 2 0, o 1 7,
a nd t anged a rrowhead.
-4 0 -
h as
b een
d etached
p latform ( Fig.
4 )
f rom
5 .1:
n o.
t he c ore t o
p repare
a
n ew
s triking
F lake w ith t he
n egative
3 ).
C ore r ejuvenation f lake/crested p iece.
i mpressions o f r emovals o n o ne s ide o f t he d orsal s urface w hich e ither c onstitute p art o f a p reviously w orked s triking p latform ( Fig.
5 .1:
n os.
2 1-22),
o r r esult f rom t he p reparation o f t he
f laked s urface o n a c ore b efore d etaching f lakes/blades. 5 )
6 )
B urin.
I mplement
s pall
( or s palls)
1 980,
6 5)
( Fig.
M icrolith. s napping
w ith a c hisel-like e nd c reated b y d etaching a f rom t he d istal e nd o f t he p iece
5 .1:
n o.
P ointed d istal e nd o f a b lade o r b ladelet p roduced b y3 o ff t he p roximal e nd u sing t he
M icroliths
c rescentic,
a s g eometric m icroliths
t echnique.
M icroburin.
t rapezoidal a nd r od s hapes a re k nown
( Fig.
5 .1:
n os.
7 -18).
D istal e nd o f a b lade o r b ladelet w ith t races o f t he
r etouched
n otch
t echnique
o n o ne s urface a nd a f racture f acet r esulting f rom t he
r esulting
f rom
m icroburin b low o n t he o ther
8 )
m icroburin
p roduced o n n arrow b lades a nd r etouched i nto a s eries
o f t riangular,
7 )
( Tixier e t a l.
5 ).
T ranchet
a xe.
H eavy
t he
( Fig.
f laked
u se
5 .1:
o f
t he
m icroburin
6 ).
n o.
c ore-implement
w ith
a
s harp
t ransverse c utting e dge c reated b y t he r emoval o f a s ingle r unning
p erpendicular t o t he c utting e dge;
t ranchet a xe-sharpening f lake n o. 4 ). 9 )
S craper.
a long
s urface
i n
o ne
t he
o r m ore e dges,
P iercer.
K nife. n os.
6 5)
I mplement
( Fig.
( Fig.
a
5 .1:
5 .2:
n os.
5 .2:
n os.
t his
e dge
i s
( the l atter i s
1 -4). b e
t he
6 -7).
i nvasive r etouched e dge o r e dges,
e dge i s a ssumed t o f unction f or
1 1-12).
w ith
r etouched
w ith a p oint w hich i s p resumed t o
( Fig.
I mplement w ith a s harp, t he
T he
b ut s ometimes s traight o r c oncave
f unctional f eature
w here
1 980,
f orming a n a ngle
2 0-90 d egrees r ange.
k nown a s a h ollow s craper)
1 1)
( Tixier e t a l.
I mplement w ith a brupt r etouch e ffected f rom t he v entral
s urface
u sually c onvex,
1 0)
f lake
t his i s k nown a s
c utting
( Fig.
5 .2:
S ome k nives h ave a brupt r etouch a long t he o pposite
e dge t o f acilitate h olding ( Fig.
5 .2:
n o.
1 1);
t hese a re k nown
a s b acked k nives. 1 2)
M icrodenticulate r etouch
t oothed s aw e dge 1 3)
O vate
o r
e ffected
o r
s errated f lake.
I mplement
f rom t he v entral s urface, ( Fig.
l aurel
5 .2:
l eaf.
n os.
N otched s urface
1 5)
R od.
f lake. ( Fig.
5 .2:
O val-shaped
i mplement
I mplement
( Fig.
w ith 5 .2:
I mplement w ith a n otch f laked f rom t he n o.
d elicate a
f ine-
9 -10).
r etouch o n b oth s urfaces a nd a long b oth e dges 1 4)
w ith
p roducing
i nvasive n o.
8 ).
v entral
5 ).
w ith a r od-like s hape f ormed b y a brupt r etouch.
T hey c an b e t riangular,
r ectangular,
-4 1 -
l ozenge-shaped o r c ircular
i n c ross-section ( Fig. 1 6)
F abricator. c rushed
5 .2:
n o.
1 3).
I mplement a braded a t o ne o r b oth e nds,
o r
s mooth a ppearance,
r esult o f c ontinued s triking o r r ubbing 1 7)
U tilised
f lake.
I mplement
p roducing a
w hich i s c onsidered ( Fig.
5 .2:
t o n o.
w ith s ome t races o f
b e
t he
1 4).
e dge
t rimming
A rtefact w ith r etouch,
b ut w hich
w hich a re p resumed t o r esult f rom u se. 1 8)
M iscellaneous r etouched f lake.
d oes n ot f all i nto a ny o f t he a bove c ategories. 1 9)
P ick.
H eavy
c ore-implement
f laked a t t he w orking e nd
i nto
a
p oint. 2 0)
G round a xe.
H eavy c ore-implement
f lakes) w ith a t ransverse c utting e dge
( Figs.
A n
e longated
u sually
n odule o f f lint i s f laked,
h ard
u ntil b oth s ides a nd e dges a re r easonably s mooth a nd e ven
T he r oughout i s t hen f laked w ith a s oft
a nd i s f inally s haped b y g rinding o n a l arge
c oarse-grained s tone ( Fig.
( a h one o r p olissoir). 2 .4:
G round-edged i mplement. o r
n o.
3 ).
I mplement o ther t han a f abricator,
m ost c ommon t ype o f i mplement e ncountered i n
( Fig.
5 .2:
n o.
L eaf-shaped t he
t his
c ategory
P rojectile p oint b ifacially w orked i nto
5 .2:
n o.
p oint ( Fig.
a rrowhead.
P rojectile p oint 5 .2:
n o.
o r p etit t ranchet d erivative
5 .2:
n os.
c hisel
a rrowheads f orm
( Fig.
b ifacially
w orked
1 7).
a rrowhead.
P rojectile
w orked i nto a v ariety o f t riangular o r t rapezoidal 1 8-20).
t ransverse a rrowhead : 1 8),
p ressure
1 6).
i nto t he s hape o f a l ozenge T ransverse
a b arb ( Fig.. 5 .2:
T here
a re
t hree
p etit t ranchet a rrowheads
a rrowheads
( triangular,
f requently
a re
1 5).
a rrowhead.
L ozenge-shaped
a xe
K nives
s hape o f a l eaf a nd o f l enticular c ross s ection b y
f laking ( Fig.
b lock
A n arrow a xe i s
c hisel w ith e dges t hat h ave b een g round s mooth.
t he
2 4)
2 .4). a
h ammer
k nown a s a c hisel
2 3)
w ith
i nto a r oughout.
o f
2 2)
2 .3 a nd
h ammer,
( a p reform),
2 1)
( though s ometimes m anufactured
o n
( Fig.
5 .2:
n o.
s hapes
m ain
f orms
( Fig.
5 .2:
1 9).
a nd
o blique
w ith o ne c orner u sually a ccentuated n o.
2 0).
e xecuted o n a " Levallois"
T he
4c hisel
f lake
o f n o. t o
a rrowheads a re
r emoved f rom a d isc-
s haped c ore. 2 5)
B arbed
a nd t anged a rrowhead.
s hape,
w ith
s ymmetrical 5 .2:
5 .2(ii)
n o.
b arbs a rranged e ither s ide o f a c entral
t ang
i n t wo
( Fig.
2 1).
c riteria w ere u sed i n s electing f lint a ssemblages s uitable
t he a nalysis.
c ontexts,
t riangular
S election o f a ssemblages f or t he a nalysis.
T hree f or
P rojectile p oint,
o ne e dge w orked b y p ressure f laking t o p roduce
f or
F irst o nly s ites i n s outhern B ritain w ith
e xampie s ealed o ccupation l ayers,
- 4 2 -
p its
a nd
c losed d itches,
c ontaining
a ssemblages
w hich
p rovide i nformation o n
f unction o f t he s ite w ere c hosen b ias o r
( Table 5 .1).
S econd,
t he
d ate
a nd
t o m inimise t he
f rom s elective r ecovery o f s pecific t ypes o f a rtefact o n a
s ite
f rom s mall s ample s ize o f t he t otal f lint p opulation p resent a t
s ite,
o nly
a ssemblages c ontaining 1 00 o r m ore h umanly-struck
w ere i ncluded. a nd b oth l ong i nstance,
a nalysis.
I n
f lintwork
f lints
A n e xception w as m ade f or c ursus a nd h enge m onuments, a nd r ound b arrows, a s v ery f ew f lint a ssemblages
r ecovered f rom t hese t ypes o f s ite c ontain m ore t han 1 00 t his
a
f lints.
I n
a ll r eliably-excavated s ites w ere c onsidered f or
t he
t he c ase o f b arrows,
i t i s d ifficult t o s eparate
t he
a ssociated w ith s ite c onstruction f rom t hat a ssociated w ith
s ite m aintenance a nd u se.
I n a ll c ases,
t he f lints a ssociated
w ith
t he b urial d eposits a nd p rimary s ilts i n t he d itches h ave b een u sed i n t he
a nalysis.
h and
T hird,
l imited t ime a nd r esources p recluded a
s tudy o f t he f lintwork i tself.
t o b e u sed, d esigned
f rom
t ext
b ut a s tandardized c lassification o f f lint a rtefacts
w as
w hich c ould a ccommodate a ll t he a rtefact c ategories u sed
e ach r eport c lear
f irst
P ublished r eports t herefore h ad
( see s ection 5 .2(1)
a bove).
I n s everal i nstances,
c omparing t he i llustrations w ith t he n d escriptions i n
t hat s ome a rtefacts h ad b een m isidentified /
i n
i t w as t he
R eports t hat
w ere
c onsidered u nreliable o r a mbiguous w ere t herefore d iscounted.
5 .2(111)
The a nalysis.
T able
5 .1
l ists
t he
n eolithic s ites
a ccording t o t heir c haracter a nd d ate,
u sed
i n
t his
a nalysis
a nd g ives d etails o f t he
f lint
a ssemblages f rom e ach s ite. I t p roved i mpractical t o p lot f requency g raphs d isplaying t he v ariation i n i ndividual t ypes o f i mplement, a s a n umber
o f
r eports c ontain i nadequate r ecords o f t he t otals
o f
e ach
c lass o f a rtefact r ecovered: f or e xample H urst F en, S uffolk ( Clark e t a l. 1 960). I nstead, h istograms s howing t he n umber o f s ites a nd t he n umber S ites s ites;
o f
d ifferent
t ypes o f i mplement w ere
c ompiled
( Fig.
5 .3).
6h ave
o val
b een g rouped i nto t he f ollowing c ategories: d omestic l ong b arrows a nd c airns ( both c hambered a nd u nchambered);
a nd
r ound
b arrows
a nd
r ing-ditches;
c ursus
c ausewayed a nd o ther e arlier n eolithic e nclosures;
h enge
m onuments; m onuments;
a nd f lint m ines.
5 .2(iv)
R esults
I t i s a pparent t hat f lint w as w orked a t a ll c ategories o f s ite, a lthough s ome o f t he c hambered c airns, o val a nd r ound b arrows l ocated o ff
t he
c halk
o nly c ontain
e xplained b y e ither c ontext, o f
f lint.
f inished
i mplements.
T his
c ould
b e
r ecovery b ias o r r estricted a vailability
T he p roduction o f c ore-implements i s l argely c onfined
t o
m ining s ites, w hereas t he f lint a ssemblages f rom a ll o ther s ites a re d ominated b y f lake-implements. E arlier n eolithic m ines w ere l argely o rientated t owards t he p roduction o f a xe r oughouts a nd p reforms. 7 T hese
w ere
a lso
p roduced,
n eolithic f lint m ines, i mplements, i ncluding
a lso m anufactured ( Saville a ssemblages
t hough t o
a
l esser
e xtent,
a t
l ater
w here a v ariety o f d iscoidal k nives a nd o ther a s mall p roportion o f f lake-implements, w ere 1 981a).
N ot s urprisingly,
t hen,
t he
f lint
f rom s ites r ! oncerned w ith l arge-scale q uarrying a nd f lint-
w orking c an h e
i splated f rom o ther L ategories o f s ite.
- 4 3 -
T able 5 .1
S ites i n s outhern B ritain u sed f or t he a nalysis o f l ater m esolithic a nd n eolithic
f lint a ssemblages.
L ater m esolithic s ites 1 .
W awcott I II,
2 .
W awcott X XIII, B erks. T olpits L ane S ite B , H erts.
3 . 4 .
H igh R ocks,
B erks.
E ast S ussex
s ee G azetteer,
T able 1
s ee G azetteer,
T able 1
s ee G azetteer, M oney 1 960
T able 1
E arlier n eolithic d omestic s ites
5 . 6 . 7 . 8 .
B roome H eath, H urst F en,
N orfolk*
W ainwright 1 972
S uffolk*
C lark e t a l.
B ishopstone,
E ast S ussex
B ell 1 977
H azard H ill,
D evon
H oulder 1 963
1 960
L ater n eolithic d omestic s ites
9 .
C assington,
1 0.
B arton C ourt F arm,
O xon.
1 1.
B arrow H ills,
1 2.
T hrupp S ite C .,
O xon.
R adley, O xon. O xon. O xon.
s ee G azetteer,
T ables 4 a nd 8
s ee G azetteer,
Tables 4 a nd 8
s ee G azetteer,
T ables 4 a nd 8
s ee G azetteer,
T ables 4 a nd 8
s ee G azetteer,
T ables 4 a nd 8
s ee G azetteer,
T ables 4 a nd 8
1 3.
S utton C ourtenay,
1 4.
M ount F arm,
1 5.
W est K ennet A venue,
1 6.
A vebury G 55,
1 7.
S torey's B ar R oad,
1 8.
E cton,
1 9.
B ullock D own,
E ast S ussex
D rewett
2 0.
A rreton D own,
I sle o f W ight
A lexander e t a l.
B erinsfield,
O xon.
W ilts.
s ee G azetteer,
T ables 4 a nd 8 T ables 4 a nd 8
F engate,
s ee G azetteer, P ryor 1 978
W ilts. C ambs.
N orthants.
M oore a nd W illiams 1 982,
1 975
H olgate
f /c
( b)
1 960
E arlier n eolithic c hambered a nd u nchambered l ong b arrows a nd c airns 2 1.
W est K ennet,
2 2.
W ayland's S mithy,
W ilts.
2 3.
L ambourn,
2 4.
F ussell's L odge,
2 5. 2 6.
H old f tlhurst, H ampnett I I,
H ants. G los.
P iggott 1 937 s ee G azetteer,
6 Table 2
2 7.
H azleton I I,
G los.
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 6
2 8.
N otgrove I ,
s ee G azetteer,
6 Table 2
2 9.
S well I ,
s ee G azetteer,
6 T able 2
3 0.
W ithington I I,
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 6
3 1. 3 2.
A scott-under-Wychwood, N ympsfield, G los.
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 6
B erks.
B erks. H ants.
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 7
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 7
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 8
A shbee 1 966
G los.
G los. G los. O xon.
C lifford 1 938;
S aville 1 979b
E arlier n eolithic e nclosures
3 3 .
A bingdon,
3 4.
W indmill H ill,
3 5 .
R ybury H ill,
3 6.
K nap H ill,
3 7. 3 8.
S taines, S urrey* O rsett, E ssex*
O xon. W ilts. *
W ilts.
W ilts.
- 4 4 -
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 5
azetteer, s ee G
T able 2 5
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 5
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 5
s ee G azetteer,
T able 2 5
azetteer, s ee G
T able 2 5
3 9.
T he T rundle,
W est S ussex
4 0.
B arkhale,
4 1. 4 2.
B ury H ill, W est S ussex W hitehawk, E ast S ussex*
4 3.
O ffham,
4 4.
C ombe H ill,
4 5.
C am nB rea,
C urwen 1 929; 1 931; a nd A ldworth 1 981 L each 1 983 B edwin 1 981
W est S ussex
W illiamson 1 930; 1 936
E ast S ussex
B edwin
C urwen 1 934;
D rewett 1 977 M usson 1 950 M ercer 1 981a
E ast S ussex C ornwall
E arlier n eolithic f lint m ines 4 6.
H arrow H ill, W est S ussex
C urwen a nd C urwen 1 926;
4 7.
B lackpatch,
4 8. 4 9.
C hurch H ill, F indon, W . C issbury, W est S ussex*
H olleyman 1 936; H olgate f orthcoming a G oodman e t a l. 1 924; P ye 1 968 P ye 1 968
5 0.
L ong D own,
W est S ussex* S ussex*
L ane F ox 1 869; W illett 1 880; P ye 1 968 S alisbury 1 961; H olgate f orthcoming a
W est S ussex*
L ater n eolithic f lint m ines 5 1.
G rimes G raves,
N orfolk**
S aville 1 981a
L ater n eolithic b arrows a nd r ing-ditches 5 2.
5 3 . 5 4.
5. 5 6.
5 7 .
B arrow H ills, R adley, O xon. D orchester s ite V III, O xon. N orth S toke l inear d itches, O xon. B eckhampton R oad, W ilts. S outh S treet, W ilts.
6 0.
S onning, B erks. A lfriston, E ast S ussex T hrupp S ite B , O xon. C orporation F arm, A bingdon, O xon.
6 1. 6 2. 6 3.
D orchester I , O xon. D orchester I I, O xon. D orchester I V, O xon.
6 4 .
D orchester V , O xon. D orchester V I, O xon. D orchester X I, O xon. M ount F arm, B erinsfield, O xon. E nglefield, B erks.
5 8.
5 9 .
6 5.
6 6 . 6 7.
6 8 .
s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able D rewett, 1 975 s ee G azetteer, s ee G azetteer, s ee G azetteer, s ee G azetteer,
2 9 2 9 2 9 2 9 2 9 2 9
T able 3 0 T able 3 0 T able 3 0
T able 3 0 s ee G azetteer, T able 3 0 s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able s ee G azetteer, T able
3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0
L ater n eolithic c ursus m onuments 6 9.
D rayton,
7 0. 7 1.
D orchester, O xon. M axey, C ambs.
O xon.
7 2.
S tonehenge G reater C ursus,
s ee G azetteer, T able 3 1
W ilts.
s ee G azetteer, T able 3 1 P ryor a nd F rench 1 985 S tone 1 947; C hristie 1 963; S aville 1 980c.
- 4 5 -
L ater n eolithic h enge m onuments
7 3.
C ondicote,
7 4.
D evil's Q uoits,
7 5.
B ig R ings,
G los.
s ee G azetteer, T able 3 2 O xon.
s ee G azetteer,
O xon.
7 6.
T he S anctuary,
7 7.
A vebury,
7 8.
W aulud's B ank,
7 9 .
M axey,
8 0.
A rminghall,
T able 3 2
s ee G azetteer, T able 3 2
W ilts.
s ee G azetteer, T able 3 2
W ilts.
s ee G azetteer, T able 3 2 B eds.
s ee G azetteer,
C ambs.
T able 3 2
P ryor a nd F rench 1 985; S impson 1 985 C larke 1 936a
N orfolk
8 1.
D urrington W alls,
8 2.
M arden,
8 3.
M ount P leasant,
D orset
W ainwright 1 979
8 4 .
M aumbury R ings,
D orset
B radley 1 976
d enotes
W ilts.
W ainwright a nd L ongworth 1 971
W ilts.
W ainwright 1 971
e arlier
n eolithic
s ite
w hich
a lso
p roduced
l ater
n eolithic m aterial **
d enotes n eolithic s ite w hich a lso p roduced B ronze A ge m aterial
-4 6 -
M
T ab le 5 . 1
g
T ab le 5 . 1
g
1
I l i
1 " i
2
M
a
8
e
t j 3 8 1
g
5
i
M
_ >
e
.
S ite a nd N .G .R . L AT ER M ESOLI TH IC S EE 4 .
H igh R o cks
1 0 00.
§
1
2
2 8
M
s r , g
5 3
1 0 53.
g
a )
gs
9
e. ;
AMA2
T atle 5 . 1 ( c ontd .)
S ite a nd N .G .R . E A RLIER N EOLITHIC D O4ESTIC b l IIS 5 .
B i
, eH e ath
6 .
H i rst F e n
7 .
B i shop stcne
8 .
H azard H i ll
8 9 31
1 4 0
1
2 54
1 4 500.
5 00 .
3 4
7 36
4 5 62
1 4 0
8 3
9 8
1 0 25
3 4
2 1 97
7 0
4 1 8 3
6 8
4
1
1
4 2
5 6 7
3 4
6 0
6
1 8
2
15 40 .356.
1
1
1 7 2 1 6 3
1
2 19
7
2
6 2 1
5 8
1
7 .
1
9 440
4 1
1
1 6 851+ 1 5 366
1 2
3 5 98
L ATER N E OLITHIC D OM ESTIC S l itS 1 7 . S torey 's B ar R d .
23.
1 8 . E c t cn
63
2
541
3
1 9 . h i l lo ck D o wn 2 0 . A rr etcn D o wn
1 66 7
6 3 +
4 +
2 5
2 3 .
1 + 1
1 0 1
6
3 7
7 6 "
2 5
1 + 1 0 3
*
1 +
2 1 4
? 2
1
2 1
211
1
13+
7 +
9 4
2
3 2
1
*
1 0
4 9
6
5
3
1 +
4 3 7. 1
2
8 0 9
5
2 5 793 1 7 39
E A RLIER N EOLITHIC C H AMBE RED A ND U NCH AMBE RED L ONG B ARROWS A ND C AIRNS 2 4 . F u ssel l 's L e dg e 2 5 . H o lden hur st 2 6 . N ympsf ield
3 8 0 •
4
1
2
4
2
3 1
5
4 36 5 +
3 1
1
1
3
2
3 9
E A RL I ER N EOL I TH IC E NUOSUR ES 3 9 . T he T rundle
3
1
*
2 1 16.
8 7 .
4 0 . B a r kha le
4 0 4
1 7
1 2
1 3
4 1 . B u ry H i ll
3 5 23
3 6
1 2 3
8 1 8
4 2 . k a t iteha . i , 4 3 . O ffham 4 . C omte H i ll 4 5 . C a in B r ae
2 1 . 4 5 23
8 +
3 .
2
8 1
1
2
2 2 0
2
6 1
1
6
1 0
3
2 3
6
2 8
2
4 2 2 77
2
1
1
4
4 1
3 8 34
1 3 1
1 1
4
3 7 42 1
4 5 8
4
4 5 8 1
1
1 8 6
1 2 3 28 + 4 7 4
2
5 2
4 1 9 2 0311
1 4
8 7
1 8
4 2 1
6 33 4 20 7 5 1
3 1
4 2
2 6368
E A RLIER N E OLITHIC F LINT M INES 4 +
4 6 . H ar m .,Hi l l 4 7 . B l ackpat ch
•
4 8 . C hu rch H i ll
2
1
1 2
1
1
2 0
1
2
8
1 2 +
1 3
4
4 5
4 9 . C i ssturY
•
5 4 .
6 +
2 3 +
1 4 +
5 0 . L ang D o wn
*
1 8 .
3 .
5 8
2 1
4 9 0
1 0 04
1
1 0 3 .
1 2 8+
1 5 8 +
22+
6
7 0+
1 6 8+
1 7 +
5 4 .
1 5 8.
5 1 +
4 38 +
9 1
7
1 + 1
2 86
L A TER N E ELITHIC F L INT M I NES 5 1 . C ü ime s C raves
1 0 4+
4 ? 3 26
7
3
-4 7 -
2
2 79
3 5 1 2 457
1
1
3 6 5 0 6 8
T a t t le 5 .1 ( c cntd .)
§
§
L s!a
m Arr e ng
S ite a nd N .G .R .
I
1 41;
L ATER N EOL ITHIC B AR ID AS A ND R ING -DT T CT IE S 5 8 . A lr ristcn
7 998
4 7
1 51
2 4
1 6
1
1 0
8 4
1
8 354
L ATER N B CL ITHIC C OR MS m a me ns 7 1 . M axey 7 2 . S toneheng e
1 253
2
l o
2 0
1 285
L AT ER N EO LIIHIC H EN CE M ONUM ENES 7 9 . M axey 8 0 . A r T n inghall
1 1 07
8 1 . C urring tcn W aL ls 1082 8 2 . M arden 8 3 . M ount P leasant 8 4 . M auntury R ing s
34 9 475 6 0+
1
e o
9 5 7
2 0 7
1 1 05 1 +
1 7 6
4
1 0
1 8
1
1 61
6
3 +
1 7
1
5
2 1 5
7
3
2 +
5
2 1
1
1
2
2 4 7+
—4 8 —
5 8 3 1 0
2
2
1467 3 61 9 796 1 23+
EARL IER DO MEST IC
NE OL ITH IC
S ITES
LATER
S ITES
NEOL ITH IC
DOMEST IC
6
6
4
4
S ITES
S ITES
1 8 1 4
2
2 0
1
1 7
1 0
1 2
9
2
5 2
4
LONG
6
6
7
8
1 0
0
1 2
2
BARRO WS
1 3
1 5
6
4
BARR O WS
6
1 6
AND
1 9 1 0
1 2
R ING-D ITCHES
6
68
4
4
6 1
2 8
3 0
2 5
2 9
22
2 7
3 2
2 1
2 6
3 1
2
2
2
4
6
8
1 0
6 7
6 6
5 7
6 2
s o
6 4
5 3
5 8
5 5
63
5 2
5 6
0
1 2
2
4
6
CURSUS
8
1 0
1 2
1 0
1 2
MONUMENTS
4
2 7 2 69 2
ENCLOSURES
1
HENGE
4
6
MONU MENTS
6
4 4 4 4 3
45
4 0
4 2
2
3 6 2
F L INT
39
4 1 6
4
38
8 2
3 7 3 4 8
7 8
3 3 1 0
8 4
M INES
4
F L INT
8 31 8 1
7 7
7 6
2
1 2
6
8
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 0
1 2
M INES
6
6
4
4 49 4 8
2
2 4 7 46 2
F r i
50
4
6
8
1 0
2
1 2
4
F igure 5 .3 The range of i mplements i n e arlier a nd l ater n eolithic f lint a ssemblages i n s outhern B ritain. T he y -axis r epresents t he n umber t ypes
o f
s ites
a nd t he x -axis r epresents t he n umber
o f i mplement p resent a t e ach s ite.
r efer t o s ites l isted i n T able 5 .1.
- 4 9 -
o f
T he n umbers i n
d ifferent t he
b oxes
T he
d itches,
b anks a nd m ounds a ssociated w ith a ll
b arrows
a nd
c ursus
m onuments c ontain s mall q uantities o f f lintwork a nd a
l imited
n umber
o f
e arlier
d ifferent
t ypes o f i mplement.
B urials m ade
i n
n eolithic l ong b arrows a nd c hambered c airns w ere r arely a ccompanied b y f lint a rtefacts. t hese
O f t he f ew i mplements t hat h ave b een r ecovered f rom
c ontexts,
o ccasionally,
l eaf-shaped a rrowheads f orm t he l argest
e xample a t W est K ennet,
W ilts.
b urials,
s ometimes
g oods,
t hough,
h ave
( Piggott 1 962,
F arm,
O xon.:
G rimes 1 960,
B erinsfield,
O xon.:
2 3).
b een f ound
w hich i nclude g round-edged k nives
H arcourt,
p roportion;
t he a rrowhead i tself w as t he i nstrument o f
1 56-7),
d eath,
a ssociated w ith
( e.g.
L inch
H ill,
r etouched b lades
G eorge L ambrick p ers.
f or
L ater n eolithic
c omm.)
g rave S tanton
( e.g.
M ount
a nd l ozenge-
s haped a rrowheads ( e.g. B arrow H ills, R adley, O xon.: B radley e t a l. 1 984). T he d eposition o f f lintwork w ith n eolithic b urials t herefore a ppears t o h ave b een d eliberately s elective. T he i n
f lint a ssemblages r etrieved f rom c ausewayed e nclosures
t he q uantity a nd d iversity o f i mplements t hat t hey
g roups a re d iscernible: f ew i mplements,
T wo
t hose p roducing f lint a ssemblages w ith
v ery
f or e xample O ffham,
w ith a v ariety o f i mplements, 1 965a).
T his
u ndoubtedly
f ollowed t he s ame s equence o f u se.
f lint
h ave
S ussex
( Drewett 1 977),
f or e xample W indmill H ill,
a nd t hose
W ilts.
s hows t hat n ot a ll c ausewayed
h ave b een p urely c eremonial, n ecessarily
v ary
c ontain.
( Smith
e nclosures
A lthough s ome o f t hese s ites c ould
t he c eremonies t hat t ook p lace n eed
n ot
a ll i nvolved t he d eposition o f a s tandard r ange
a rtefacts.
F urthermore,
s ome
s ites
c ould
h ave
o f
w itnessed
d omestic a ctivity, a t l east a t s ome s tage w hile t hey w ere i n u se. O f t he f our c ausewayed e nclosures w ith a l ow i mplement d iversity, a ll a re l ocated o n t he c rest o f d ownland s carp s lopes a nd w ere c onstructed w oodland 2 26)
c learings
( Thomas 1 982;
6 6);
E vans 1 971,
D rewett
i n
( 1977,
h as s uggested t hat t he S ussex s ites o n t he n orthern e dge o f
t he
D owns w ere u sed a s c eremonial s ites. T he o ther c ausewayed e nclosures, j udging f rom t he q uantity o f d omestic d ebris f ound i n t he d itches, c ould
h ave s een s ome f orm o f d omestic a ctivity,
n ature
o f t his a ctivity a re u nclear.
h ave b een c eremonial s ites,
t hough t he d ate
a nd
A ll e nclosures c ould i nitially
l ater b ecoming d omestic i n
f unction,
a s
r ecently s uggested f or t he e nclosures i n D enmark ( Madsen 1 982; p ers. c omm.). T he c hronology o f n eolithic p ottery s tyles i n B ritain, i n c ontrast
t o
h ypothesis.
D enmark,
i s
F urthermore,
n ot
s ufficiently
m any
r efined
t o
t est
c ausewayed e nclosure d itch
t his
s ections
w ere r epeatedly r ecut, t hus d isturbing a ny s tratigraphic r elationships t hat m ight h elp r esolve t his i ssue. H owever, i t h as r ecently b een s hown t hat C rickley H ill, n eolithic p eriod ( Dixon
G los. 1 981),
i nvolved a c hange i n t he s ite's
u nderwent a s eries o f c hanges i n t he s ome o r a ll o f w hich c ould h ave
f unction.
H enge m onuments h ave a lso p roduced f lint a ssemblages w hich v ary i n t he r ange o f i mplements t hey c ontain. E xcavations a t E ast A nglian a nd U pper T hames v alley h enges d id n ot p roduce a ny i mplements, m ost
o f
t he l arge W essex h enges p roduced a
T his p robably m onuments.
b oth
i ndicates
r egional
v ariety
v ariations i n t he
o f
w hilst
i mplements.
u se
o f
t hese
D omestic s ites c onsistently y ield f lint a ssemblages t hat c ontain a h igh r atio o f i mplements t o d ebitage, a nd a lso a v ariety o f
i mplements.
L i
a ddition,
r ecur o n t hese s ites:
a n umbe- o f s pecific t ypes
s crapers,
p iercers,
- 5 0 -
k nives,
o f
i mplement
m icrodenticulates,
o vates, a xe
f abricators,
f lakes
c ores.
a nd
n otched f lakes,
a rrowheads a nd g round f lint b een
r eworked
A t l east f ive o f t hese i mplement-types - s crapers,
c utting t ools o r
r ods,
f ragments t hat h ave s ubsequently
( knives o r m icrodenticulates),
f ragments
n eolithic
a s
p iercers,
a rrowheads a nd a xe
f lakes
- a re r epresented i n a ll d omestic f lint a ssemblages
d ate.
I t
i s
t herefore
p ossible
t o
d efine
o f
d omestic
a ssemblages
o n t he q uantity a nd r ange o f i mplements p resent,
d istinguish
t hem
a nd
t o
f rom t he a ssemblages d erived f rom f lint m ining
a nd
b urial s ites.
5 .3
D ating f lint a ssemblages T he
s ites u sed i n t he p revious a nalysis a lso p rovided t he
b asis
f or a s tudy o f t he t ypology a nd t echnology o f f lintwork d ating t o t his p eriod.
5 .3(i)
T ypology
T he r ecognition o f c onsistently o ccurring t ypes o f a rtefacts
w as
f undamental t o t he s ystematic d evelopment o f a rchaeology ( Daniel 1 962,
7 3).
A t ypological a nalysis o f e arlier n eolithic f lint i ndustries i n
s outhern
B ritain,
w hich i ncluded e nclosures a nd d omestic s ites,
b een c arried o ut b y H ealey ( in H ealey a nd R obertson-Mackay 2 1).
T his
l ater
m esolithic,
h as
1 983,
1 3-
s ection w ill e xamine t he f lint a rtefact t ypes p resent e arlier
n eolithic
a nd l ater n eolithic
s outhern B ritain u sing a s orted c ombination t able.
e xample s ome c ertain
t he S ussex f lint m ine s ites. 7
w ith
i ntrusive m aterial,
t he
i s t o p roduce a t abulated s equence w hich s hows i f t here
a re
t ypes a nd f orms o f i mplements t hat a re c haracteristic o f
t he
l ater m esolithic, T he
T he
o bject
f or
o f
e xercise
o f
i n
T he s ame s ites a nd
c ategories o f i mplements a s t hose l isted i n T able 5 .1 w ere u sed, t he o mission o f d isturbed s ites o r s ites w ith
i n
s ites
e arlier n eolithic a nd l ater n eolithic p eriods.
t abulated s equence
( Table 5 .2)
s hows t hat t here a re
c ertain
i mplements c ommon t o b oth l ater m esolithic a nd n eolithic s ites, f or e xample s crapers. T here a re c hanges, h owever, i n t he u se o f c ertain i mplements d uring t hese p eriods, 1 )
T he
a s s ummarized b elow.
l ater m esolithic p eriod.
f lint
a ssemblages
c ontaining
T his p eriod i s b urins,
c haracterized
g eometric
b y
m icroliths,
m icroburins a nd t ranchet a xe-sharpening f lakes. 2 )
T he e arlier n eolithic p eriod. d ated
t o
t his
i mplement, p roduced;
p eriod
T he f lint a ssemblages f rom
c ontain a b road r ange o f
n ew
s ites
t ypes
o f
f or e xample k nives a nd o vates. B urins a re n o l onger l eaf-shaped a rrowheads r eplace m icroliths a s
p rojectile p oints a nd g round f lint a xes r eplace t ranchet a xes. 3 )
T he
l ater n eolithic p eriod.
p eriod e arlier
i nclude
t o
t his
a m ore r estricted r ange o f i mplement-types
t han
n eolithic
F lint a ssemblages d ating
a ssemblages
a nd
a re
c haracterized
b y
t he
p resence o f c ombination t ools, g round-edged k nives a nd c hisels; l ozenge-shaped a nd t ransverse a rrowheads r eplace l eaf-shaped a rrowheads.
-51 -
T ransverse a rrowhead
L ozenge a rrowhead
a ) 4 , • H
c d cd . Z a ) u ) a ) I 3 4 ) C t , 0 C O c d
e dged k nife
i z i
C ombination t ool
r x
s harpening f lake
li 0
M icroburin
. H P 0 A r 1 W E L ,
c d
T ranchet
• P , 0