The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies [Reprint 2019 ed.] 9780520914933

Citation preview

The Rice Economies

For Sandy

The Rice Economies Technology and Development in Asian Societies FRANCESCA BRAY

University of California Press Berkeley • Los Angeles • London

University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 1986 by Francesca Bray First Paperback Printing 1994 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bray, Francesca. T h e rice economies : technology and development in Asian societies / Francesca Bray, p. cm. Originally published: Oxford ; New York : Blackwell, 1986. With a new pref. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-520-08620-1 1. Rice trade—Asia. 2. Asia—Economic conditions—19453. Agriculture—Economic aspects—Asia. I. Title. HD9066.A7B73 1994 338.1 '7318'095—dc20 93-41318 CIP Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 T h e paper used in this publication meets the m i n i m u m requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, A N S I Z39.48-1984. ®

Contents

List of figures and tables

viii

Chinese dynasties

x

Japanese eras

xi

Preface

xiii

Acknowledgements

xxi

Maps

xxiii

Introduction

1

Eurocentric models of historical change An alternative model The significance of a model of development for rice economies

1 5

The rice-plant: diversity and intensification

8

The origins of Asian rice Natural characteristics of Selection techniques 2

3

1

rice

5

8 11 19

Paths of technical development

27

Building new fields Raising yields Labour productivity and the mechanisation question

28 42 54

Water control

62

Water control and institutions: the debate A technical classification of water control systems

63 68

vi

Contents

Gravity-fed irrigation networks Ponds, tanks and reservoirs Contour canals 'Creek' irrigation Pump irrigation schemes Patterns of growth and change

4 Rice and the wider economy 'Skill-oriented' and 'mechanical' technologies The specificity of wet-rice agriculture Uniformity and systemic change Monoculture and markets Economic diversification Petty commodity production and rural industrialisation

5 Development Some basic issues Labour and capital The historical experience: the predominance of labour and the 'Japanese model' Choice of technological inputs Capital investment Productivity of labour and capital Expertise and participation

6 Peasant, landlord and state: changes in relations of production Conflict, cooperation and control Historical changes in relations of production 'Feudal' relations and frontier zones Smallholder economies: expansion and stagnation Egalitarianism or differentiation: the impact of capitalism Land and landlessness 'Land to the tiller' Group farming Socialist land reform

69 71 80 90 100 105

113 113 116 119 124 131 134

140 141 147 148 155 158 163 166

170 170 175 175 179 182 185 190 193 194

Appendix A: The Western model

198

Appendix B: The historical experience of China

203

Contents

vii

Appendix C: The Japanese experience

210

Notes

218

References

228

Glossary

248

Index

250

Figures and tables

Figures 1.1 1.2 1.3 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 4.1 4.2

Area of origin of domesticated rice 9 The rice-plant 14 Harvesting-knife, ketaman, used in Kelantan 21 Bunded field: clay model from a Han grave 31 Poldered field illustrated in the Shoushi tongkao 36 Poldered field in the 1930s in the Yangzi Delta 37 A square-pallet chain-pump 39 The Tomita estate 40 A 'seedling-horse' 47 Response to nitrogen fertiliser 50 Land productivity and irrigation ratio 63 General plan of Angkor 74 Han grave-model of irrigation pond and rice-field 78 Bamboo aqueduct 82 Wooden flume 84 Irrigation systems in the Chieng Mai Basin 86 The Fish Snout at Dujiangyan 89 Percentage of cultivated land in China under irrigation 110 KADA timetable for rice cultivation 123 Labour inputs in single- and double-cropping areas in Province Wellesley, Malaysia 126 4.3 Picking mulberry leaves to feed silkworms 133 5.1 Labour demands on a holding in Shinshu in 1823 151

Figures and tables

ix

Tables 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6

Rice production in the Burmese Delta 43 Relative contributions of area and yield to total growth in rice production during the period 195 5 - 7 3 43 Rice yields in East and Southeast Asia 52 Rice production at Satingpra, fourth to fourteenth centuries 70 Main canals along the Aka River (Northeast Honshu) in the Tokugawa period 87 Rice in French Cochinchina 95 Farm sizes in Asia 116 Underemployment in single- and double-cropping rice areas in Province Wellesley, Malaysia 126 Non-padi income as proportion of net padi income in KADA and MADA (1979/80) 131 Population densities in Asia 144 Income shares of decile groups in Asia 144 Rice yields and labour inputs 149 Rice yields and labour inputs in Japan 154 Proportion of hired labour used in rice production 163 Mechanisation in Korea and Japan 166

Chinese dynasties

Zhou: Spring and Autumn period: Warring States: Qin: Han: Three Kingdoms: Six Dynasties: Northern and Southern Dynasties: Sui: Tang: Five Dynasties: Northern Song: Southern Song: Yuan: Ming: Qing: Republic of China:

1066-221 BC 722-481 BC c.403-221 BC 221-206 BC 206 BC-AD 220 220-80 222-589 317-589 581-618 618-907 907-60 960-1127 1127-1279 1279-1368 1368-1644 1644-1911 1911-49

Japanese eras

(There is little agreement as to the exact nomenclature and dates of the periods of Japanese history; the following is a rough guide.) Jömon: Yayoi: Kofun: Yamato: Asuka: Nara: Heian: Kamakura: Muromachi: Momoyama: Tokugawa: Modern: Meiji: Taisho: Shöwa

To c.200 BC 200 BC-AD 250 250-552 300-710 552-645 645-794 794-1185 1185-1392 1473-1568 1568-1600 1600-1868 1868 to date 1868-1912 1912-26 1926-

Preface

T h i s book is a social history written from a materialist perspective. Starting from the assumption that one cannot understand the history of agrarian societies without a grasp of how the concrete conditions of agricultural production evolved, I trace the development of the technology of wet-rice agriculture in East and Southeast Asia from prehistoric to modern times, and link this development to social and economic change. As a macroregion, East and Southeast Asia is as diverse as Braudel's Mediterranean (1972) or Chaudhuri's Indian Ocean (1990). T h e unity I attribute to these multifarious societies derives from their shared reliance on the same staple crop, rice, with its technical logic of development. From Burma to the Philippines and from Bali to Korea, rice is indisputably the most important food-grain in the economy. Unlike the rice regions of South Asia, where for climatic and / o r topographical reasons effective water control is extremely difficult (Farmer 1981), in all the societies of East and Southeast Asia small-scale irrigation has been a crucial factor in the development of one of the most land- and labour-intensive farming systems in the world. T h i s 1 contrast to a Western model that has taken quite the opposite direction. In the case of the staple crop that feeds the population and fills the coffers of landowners and the state, the development of the social institutions which depend upon its supply is inseparable from the development of the agricultural system that produces the crop. Rice and wheat have quite different characteristics and requirements: farming systems based on these crops are presented with a different range of technical choices, and they experience different patterns of social and political development in consequence. I start this study with an analysis of techniques and proceed to an analysis of social formations because I think this method can throw

XIV

Preface

new light on Asian history. The past two centuries of Western supremacy have promoted the view that there is only one trajectory of technical development that constitutes real progress. Inherent in this model are capitalist criteria of efficiency consolidated during the Western experience of industrialisation and agricultural development: increasing output and profits are produced through scale economies, mechanisation and the progressive substitution of capital for labour. We have internalised the emblems of progress found in this model: we all learn at school that a tractor is more advanced than an iron plough, which is more advanced than a hoe; a thousand-acre farm specialising in wheat and run by three individuals is more efficient than a half-acre farm growing sixteen different crops and taking up much of the labour of a family of eight. The Western attachment to teleology usually works in our own favour: other societies come out as inferior, as failures. From Hegel and Marx on, China, for example, has been stigmatised as a society which failed to progress or to experience historical change until forcibly subjected to Western influence. Even Joseph Needham's writings in Science and Civilisation in China (to which I contributed [Bray, 1984]), sinophile and critical of Western claims as they are, are inspired by the essentially negative 'Needham question': until about 1500 China was ahead of Europe in many branches of science and technology, so why did China fail to develop capitalism, industrialisation and the scientific revolution? Specialists and comparatists have debated the relative importance of various 'inhibiting factors', as if capitalism was the evolutionary goal of all healthy societies. The language of failure is particularly salient in the work of economic historians, who do not hesitate to speak of China from about 1000 to 1949 in terms of stagnation, involution or 'growth without development' (e.g., Elvin 1973; Huang 1990). Yet as Perkins (1969) demonstrates, despite the natural disasters and devastating wars that interrupted the otherwise steady growth of a huge population, between 1000 and 1800 Chinese agriculture developed and expanded sufficiently rapidly to maintain, and sometimes improve, overall living standards. These centuries of economic and social continuity require positive explanation—stability is not something that can be taken for granted. Here I am not concerned with Asia's 'failure' to be like the West, though in Chapter 4 I do discuss how the organisation of labour and investment between wet-rice agriculture and other productive sectors evolved in ways that were unpropitious for industrial forms of organisation. My main concern is to provide materials for understanding Asian societies, not as evolutionary failures or stagnating ponds of

Preface

xv

surplus humanity, but as societies which work in different ways from those of Europe, and to which our accustomed teleologies cannot usefully be applied. I consider the historical analysis of an absolutely fundamental technology, the technology of staple food production, an important contribution to this endeavour. I also think it is a crucial factor in understanding how the Asian rice economies are evolving today. I first started thinking about the specificity of wet-rice economies during a year's fieldwork in Malaysia in 1976, when the discrepancies between much of the development literature and my observations at the village level set me reflecting on the different effects the Green Revolution was having on the rice and wheat regions of Asia. My ambitions to extend my hypothesis historically grew when I returned from Malaysia to continue work on a general history of Chinese agriculture. I noticed that in North China, where dry cereals were the staple crops, a pattern of technological development and relations of production rather similar to that of late medieval Western Europe started to emerge in the early centuries A.D. It was characterised by the formation of large estates that were centrally managed and heavily dependent upon economies of scale, such as the use of animal-powered machinery. T h e owners of these estates successfully resisted repeated state efforts to disestablish them (Bray 1980). But nomadic invasions and civil unrest pushed the political centre south to China's rice regions, and although large-scale ownership of land persisted throughout China's history, large-scale management became a thing of the past. T h e Chinese state, whether out of benevolence or self-interest, traditionally supported the rights of the individual peasant against aristocratic or gentry landowners. This position was easier to sustain when rice cultivation was the mainstay of the economy because even though land-ownership might be concentrated, small family farms predominated. Peasant farmers were easier to tax than the gentry, and the persistence of peasant farming must surely have been a factor in the longevity of the Chinese empire. But what was it that allowed peasant farming to survive in the teeth of gentry ambitions? Government encouragement was not enough, as we can tell from what happened during the early dynasties in North China. Unlike Gourou (1984:6), who denies any determining influence of rice cultivation on the societies in which it is practised, I feel sure that important reasons for the survival of peasant farming must lie in the basic conditions of rice production (Bray 1984). Japanese historians have long used the notion of a rice-growing culture as a fundamental explanation of the specificities of Japanese society (Kanazawa 1971; Tamaki 1979). At the time when I was pursuing

xvi

Preface

fieldwork in Malaysia there were already strong advocates for substituting a 'Japanese model' for the 'Western model' in the agricultural development of Asia's rice regions (Ishikawa 1967; Ishii 1978a). Since I first published this book in 1986, other Asian historians have started to explore the long-term demographic and economic characteristics peculiar to rice-based societies (Hayami and Tsubouchi 1990). But most economic history remains wedded to the Western bias of capitalist teleology, privileging labour productivity and profits in its interpretations. Today it seems to me that both the political and the environmental reasons for rejecting such values are overwhelming. When I completed this book eight years ago I hoped it would serve a dual purpose. T h e first was to go beyond historical analyses of Asia as 'not-Europe'. Cultural and political historians have so far been among the most creative contributors to this project. But the material conditions of life should not be neglected in these analyses, for they are as fundamental in defining a society as religion or political ideas. New criteria are needed for evaluating systems of production as well as systems of thought. T h e study of technology in this book questions Westernbiased criteria and models. I hope that soon there will be many more studies of productive technologies that diverge from Western norms, bringing original and stimulating perspectives to bear on the articulations between production and power, and transcending the language of involution, stagnation and failure. My second purpose in writing this book was to take history through the present and into the future, to provide an analysis of the social and technical frameworks which Asian agricultural modernisation programmes were and still are attempting to transform. At that time I felt that perhaps the most striking and pertinent feature common to Asia's rice economies, as described in both historical documents and contemporary literature, was that although the ownership of land tended to become concentrated when methods were improved and production increased, economies of scale did not apply as in the Western model, and the basic unit of management remained the small family farm. I expected that this would make the Western-style modernisation of established wet-rice zones particularly difficult and contentious. This has indeed proved to be the case, even in wealthy and technically advanced countries, as recent literature on the deepening of Japan's agricultural crisis shows (Tweeten 1993). There are, of course, certain rice-regions even in Asia where Western patterns occur. T h e Muda scheme in Malaysia, where processes of class differentiation have been so vividly described by Scott (1985), is one example. My explanation is that this pattern is most likely to occur

Preface

xvii

in areas, like Muda, where rice farming was introduced fairly recently and where fields were initially constructed on a large scale, so that there are few infrastructural barriers to plans involving large-scale mechanisation and farm consolidation. O n e might say that Muda's infrastructure is closer to those of Australia and California, where enormous rice fields constructed since the last world war, levelled by laser and sown from planes, use minimal labour to produce yields that are among the highest in the world. But long-established rice systems have proved extremely resistant to the transition to modern large-scale farming, which may perhaps prove to be a blessing, given the disastrous predicament of world agriculture today and the urgent need to adopt alternative strategies. Eight years after this book was first published, I now see it as serving a third purpose. I was delighted to find that some of the most enthusiastic supporters of this work were ecologists and environmentalists working on sustainable development. Environmental concerns have started to penetrate even the international development agencies. Increasing numbers of people now question the Western farming model, which, as science and technology advance, is becoming even more wasteful and destructive of the environment and of rural life (Friedmann 1990). Ecologists tend to seek inspiration for viable alternatives from small groups as yet "untainted" by Western ideas and input, for instance horticulturists in Amazonia or upland farmers in the Yucatán. Yet it is extremely unlikely that their environmentally impeccable techniques could be extended to support large populations or that their farming methods could be transposed. Nor could they solve another of the most urgent problems of our times: how to improve the livelihood of the ever-growing numbers of rural poor. According to the World Bank, 'the greatest numbers of the poor, including the very poorest, are found overwhelmingly in rural areas' (1990:33). Attempts to address this problem by modernising farming have usually just made things worse: cereal monoculture, mechanisation and expensive inputs marginalise poor farmers, displace labour and reduce alternative economic opportunities. Surely an obvious improvement is to encourage the development of agricultural systems which absorb labour and encourage economic diversification (Bray 1992; Bray forthcoming). T h e history of Asia's rice economies shows that even without chemicals and laboratory-bred seeds, intensive ricefarming has the potential to provide a lasting basis for a diversified rural economy, feeding and providing employment for large populations. I do not, of course, advocate that we try to convert Bangladesh into eighteenth-century Japan, or that we t u r n the clock back nine cen-

xviii

Preface

turies in China's Yangzi Delta. But I do think that Asian rice, as well as other farming systems where land and labour are or have been used intensively, should be carefully studied for indications as to how rural economies could best be revitalised to meet both environmental and humanitarian needs. I am grateful to the British Academy and the Royal Society for financing a field trip to Malaysia in 1976-7, to the British Council and to the Universities' China Committee for supporting a study tour to China in 1980 and to the Leverhulme Trust for providing a most generous two-year fellowship in 1982-4, which enabled me to spend several months in Asia. T h e British Academy helped me again in 1982 with a Wolfson Fellowship which allowed me to spend several months in Paris working on archival material. Dr Joseph Needham and the East Asian History of Science Library (now the Needham Research Institute) in Cambridge provided me with unfailing support throughout. It would be impossible to thank by name all those who have given me help and advice in this project. T h e villagers of Bunut Susu, and especially their imam, Encik Abdul Rahman bin Haji Suleiman, were its inspiration; it was through the kindness of the Kemubu Agricultural Development Authority staff and their economist, Puan Rohaini Zakaria, that I made their acquaintance. In Singapore I received generous help from the staff of the Institute for Southeast Asian Studies; in Kuala Lumpur from Wan Ahmad Radzi and Puan Fadillah Ibrahim and their families; in Kota Baru from Datuk Haji Yussuf Bangs, Encik Johan Arif and Robert and Pauline Whyte. In Penang the staff of the Centre for Policies Research kindly allowed me access to their invaluable collection. In Hong Kong I was given help and encouragement by, among others, Peter and Ei-Yoke Lisowski, M r and Mrs P. L. Lam and George Hicks, who was most generous in providing material from his collection on the economies of Southeast Asia. In 1977 a visit to Taiwan was made fruitful through the good offices of the Joint Committee for Rural Reconstruction, and Professor T. T. Chang of the International Rice Research Institute gave me valuable assistance in the Philippines. A study tour of China in 1980 was arranged through the kindness of Academia Sinica; to that organisation, and to all the distinguished scholars of agricultural development and history who kindly spared time to discuss their work with an undistinguished foreigner, I am grateful. In Japan I must mention Professors Hayashi Takeshi, Kojima Reiitsu and Tada Hirokazu and their colleagues at the Institute of Developing Economies and Professors Ichimura Shinichi, Ishii Yoneo and Tsubouchi Yoshihiro of the Insti-

Preface

xix

tute of Southeast Asian Studies in Kyoto, as well as Professors Katö Yuzo and Nakaoka Tetsurö and Drs Fujimoto Akimi and Christian Daniels, all of whom were kind enough to discuss my work with me. At the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in Paris, where I worked on the final stages of this book, I was fortunate in the encouragement of my directors, M. Lucien Bernot and M. Jacques Gernet. In Cambridge, Ben Farmer and Sir Joseph Hutchinson gave me much expert advice, and my colleagues at the Needham Research Institute, Gregory Blue and Timothy Brook, helped keep my feet on the Chinese ground. Sean Magee was my guardian angel at Basil Blackwell and Charlene Woodcock at the University of California Press. Without Sandy Robertson this book would never have been written, and my gratitude goes beyond words. University of California, September 1993

Santa

Barbara

Additional references Braudel, Fernand (1972): The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Harper and Row, New York. Bray, F. (1992): 'Population, agricultural intensification and economic diversification', in Lars O. Hansson and Britta Jungen (eds), Human Responsibility and Global Change, Institute of Human Ecology, University of Goteborg Press, Goteborg: 99-114. (forthcoming): 'Rice economies and agricultural development', Scientific American. Chaudhuri, K. N. (1990): Asia before Europe: Economy and Civilisation of the Indian Ocean from the Rise of Islam to 17S0, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. Friedmann, Harriet (1990): 'Family wheat farms and Third World diets: a paradoxical relationship between unwaged and waged labor', in Jane L. Collins and Martha Gimenez (eds), Work without Wages: Domestic Labor and Self-Employment Within Capitalism, State University of New York Press, Albany: 193-213. Hayami, Akira and Yoshihiro Tsubouchi (eds) (1990): Economic and Demographic Development in Rice Producing Societies, Proceedings of the Tenth International Economic History Conference, Leuven University Press, Leuven.

XX

Preface

Huang, Philip (1990): The Peasant Family and Rural Development in the YangziDelta, 1350-1988, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif. Scott, James C. (1985): Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Yale University Press, New Haven. Tweeten, Luther, Cynthia L. Dishon, Wen S. Chern, Naraomi Imamura and Masaru Morishima (eds) (1993): Japanese and American Agriculture: Tradition and Progress in Conflict, Westview Press, Boulder, Colo. World Bank (1990): World Development Report 1990: Poverty, Oxford University Press, New York.

Acknowledgements

The author and the publishers would like to thank the following for permission to use figures and tables from, or base figures and tables on, their own copyright material. Dr T. T. Chang, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, for figure 1.1, redrawn from his article 'The origin, evolution, dissemination and diversification of African and Asian Rices', Euphytica 1976; Roudedge and Kegan Paul, London, for figure 2.3, from Hsiao-T'ung Fei, Peasant Life in China: A Field Study of Country Life in the Yangtze Valley, Professor Keiji Nagahara, Department of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, for figure 2.5, from Hideo Kuroda, 'Chusei nogyo jutsu no yoso', in Nagahara and Yamaguchi (eds), Nogyo, nosankako (Nihon Hyoronsha, Tokyo, 1983; International Rice Research Institute, Manila, for figure 2.7, from R. Barker, 'Yield and fertiliser input', IRRI, 1978; Professor Shigeru Ishikawa, Aoyama University, Tokyo, for figure 3.1, from Ishikawa, Economic Development in Asian Perspective (Tokyo, 1967); Professor Yoneo Ishii, Centre for South East Asian Studies, Kyoto University, for figure 3.6, from Yoshiro Kaida, 'Irrigation and drainage: present and future', in Ishii (ed.), Thailand: A Rice-Growing Society (Hawaii UP, 1978); University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, for figure 4.2, from J. T. Purcal, Rice Economy: Employment and Income in Malaysia (EastWest Center Press, Honolulu, 1972); Board of Trustees, Stanford University Press, for figure 5.1, from Thomas C. Smith, TheAgrarian Origins of Modern Japan (Stanford UP, 1959); Dr Janice Stargardt, Cambridge Project on Ancient Civilization in South East Asia, for table 3.1, based on table 21 from Stargardt, Satingpra I: The Environmental and Economic Archaeology ofSouth Thailand (Oxford and Singapore, 1983).

N. K O R E A /

Peking

(-IOKKAIDOX JAPAN

Pyongyang V ^

HONSHL

Seoul S. K O R E A fi( «Pusan^Kyoto

CHINA

AMO)^

et

/IjAIWAN

HONG KONG