Ramus and Talon Inventory [Reprint 2014 ed.] 0674862600, 9780674862609

Citation preview

RAMUS A N D T A L O N INVENTORY A S H O R T - T I T L E I N V E N T O R Y O F T H E PUBLISHED W O R K S O F PETER R A M U S (1515-1572) AND O F O M E R TALON (m. 1510-1562) IN T H E I R O R I G I N A L AND IN T H E I R VARIOUSLY A L T E R E D F O R M S

WITH RELATED MATERIAL: 1. T H E R A M I S T C O N T R O V E R S I E S : A D E S C R I P T I V E C A T A L O G U E 2. AGRICOLA CHECK LIST: A S H O R T - T I T L E I N V E N T O R Y O F S O M E P R I N T E D E D I T I O N S AND P R I N T E D C O M P E N D I A O F R U D O L P H AGRICOLA'S DIALECTICAL (DE INVENTIONE

INVENTION

DIALECTICA)

By

Walter J. Ong, S.J.

T h i s t i t a n toil b e g o t t h e R a m i s t clan — no, rather T h i s t i t a n toil b e g o t L o g i c a g a i n . T a n t a e molis erat R a m e u m c o n d e r e g e n t e m : imo, T a n t a e molis e r a t L o g i c o r u m condere gentem. — F r e i g e , Lije of

Ramus

Harvard University Press Cambridge,

Massachusetts 1958

© Copyright, 1958, by the President and Fellows of H a r v a r d College

Distributed in G r e a t Britain by Oxford University Press, London

Publication of this book has been aided by a grant from the Ford Foundation

Library of Congress Catalog Card N u m b e r 58-10404 P R I N T E D IN T H E U M T C D STATES O F A M E R I C A

RAMUS A N D T A L O N INVENTORY A SHORT-TITLE INVENTORY OF THE PUBLISHED WORKS OF PETER RAMUS (1515-1572) AND OF OMER TALON (cc. 1510-1562) IN THEIR ORIGINAL AND IN THEIR VARIOUSLY ALTERED FORMS WITH RELATED MATERIAL: 1. THE RAMIST CONTROVERSIES: A DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE 2. AGRICOLA CHECK LIST: A SHORT-TITLE INVENTORY OF SOME PRINTED EDITIONS AND PRINTED COMPENDIA OF RUDOLPH AGRICOLA'S DIALECTICAL (DE INVENTIONE

INVENTION

DIALECTICA)

By

Walter J. Ong, S.J.

This titan toil begot the Ramist clan — no, rather This titan toil begot Logic again. T a n t a e molis erat R a m e u m condere gentem: imo, T a n t a e molis erat Logicorum condere gentem. — Freige, Life of Ramus

THE F O L C R O F T PRESS, INC. F O L C R O F T , PA.

First Published 1958 Reprinted 1969

RAMUS A N D T A L O N INVENTORY A SHORT-TITLE INVENTORY OF THE PUBLISHED WORKS OF PETER RAMUS (1515-1572) AND OF OMER TALON (ca. 1510-1562) IN THEIR ORIGINAL AND IN THEIR VARIOUSLY ALTERED FORMS WITH RELATED MATERIAL: 1. THE RAMIST CONTROVERSIES: A DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE 2. AGRICOLA CHECK LIST: A SHORT-TITLE INVENTORY OF SOME PRINTED EDITIONS AND PRINTED COMPENDIA OF RUDOLPH AGRICOLA'S DIALECTICAL (DE INVENTI0NE

INVENTION

DIALECTIC A)

By

Walter J. Ong, S.J.

This titan toil begot the Ramist clan — no, r a t h e r This titan toil begot Logic again. T a n t a e molis erat R a m e u m c o n d e r e gentem: imo, T a n t a e molis erat Logicorum condere gentem. — Freige, Life of Ramus

DARBY BOOKS DAR1JY, P A .

First Published 1958 Reprinted 1969

C O N T E N T S Page

ί1^

INTRODUCTION SIGNS AND ABBREVIATIONS

t25]

INVENTORY CONTENTS

[37]

INVENTORY ENTRIES

U+6]

THE RAMIST CONTROVERSIES I. The Gouveia-Raraus Aristotelian Quarrel II. The Perion Attack on Ramus' AntiAristotelianism and Anti-Ciceronianism III. The Ramus-Galland Curriculum Dispute, with Commentary by Rabelais IV. The Charpentier-Ossat Controversy on Method V. The Ramus-Turn^be Controversy on Dialectic and Fate VI. The Ramus-Charpentier Litigation over Mathe matics and the "Prippelipique" Literature VII. The Riolan Critique of Ramus VIII. The Ramus-Schegk Dispute on Dialectic and Method IX. The Digby-Teraple-Piscator-Richard Harvey Controversy on Method X. The Ramists, Anti-Ramists, and Syncretists Whose Works Figure in the Ramist Controversies and in Other Ramist Literature AGRICOIA CHECK LIST

m [1+95] [1+96] [1+98]

[500] [500] [501+]

[506] [506] [510] [53lj.]

I L L U S T R A T I O N S P. Rami . . . Dialecticae libri duo (1572) [title-page of copy in Trinity College Library, Dublin] Facing p. [192] Rodolphi Agricolae . . . De inventione dialectica libri tres [title-page of Jean de Bomont's copy in the Biblioth&que Nationale, Paris]

Pacing p. [51+2]

FOREWORD The present book, while it forma an Integral unit of its own, is published conjointly with the author's Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue, which in great part depends on this documentary study, putting to further use the documentation here provided and situating the items in the present work in their larger historical context.

I wish to ac-

knowledge for the present book the same debts of gratitude which are noted in the Foreword to Ramus, iiethod, and the Decay of Dialogue and which it would be only tedious to repeat here, although my special indebtedness to the staffs of many libraries, particularly in iiurope, and to the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, which made it possible for me to visit all these libraries, is here rather spectacularly evident.

Walter J. Ong, 3.J.

St. Louis University September 1, 1956

RAMUS

AND

TALON

INVENTORY

I n t r o d u c t i o n

1.

General Purpose

This Inventory I s t o provide elementary documentation f o r the study o f Ramism and i t s m i l i e u .

It

furnishes a l i s t of a l l e d i t i o n s which I have been a b l e t o discover o f works by P e t e r Ramus (1515-72) and h i s l i t e r a r y a s s o c i a t e Omer Talon (the KLder, or Audomarus Talaeus, l 5 l 0 ? - 6 2 ) , t o g e t h e r w i t h subsidary l i s t s

of

m a t e r i a l s and authors i n v o l v e d in Ramism, and l o c a t e s c o p i e s of e d i t i o n s .

It

i s organized, so f a r as p o s s i b l e ,

with a view to i t s being used by Henaissance scholars and others i n t e r e s t e d in the h i s t o r y o f

thought,

l i t e r a t u r e , and c u l t u r e who may be n e i t h e r

Latin

s p e c i a l i s t s nor p r o f e s s i o n a l b i b l i o g r a p h e r s ,

although

i t i s hoped that L a t i n i s t s and b i b l i o g r a p h e r s , w i l l find i t

usable. [1]

too,

In 1855, Charles Waddington had provided a catalogue of Ramus' writings as an appendix to his book Ramus:

sa vie, sea Scrita, et ses opinions, but, valuable

as this catalogue is as a pioneer work, it is not only sketchy and inadequate, but also highly inaccurate (cross references are impossibly garbled, for one thing), and often positively misleading.

Waddington lists, for

example, thirty editions of Ramus' Dialectic in Latin or French.

There are some 300 listed in the present Inven-

tory, all but a dozen or so of these being from before the end of the seventeenth century.

Waddington, and almost

everyone since his time, is apparently unaware of the fact that the Rhetoric printed under the name of Omer Talon, ia very likely even in its earliest beginning and certainly in its later stages, in some sense Ramus' own work. Waddington lists five editions of this Rhetoric, specifying three of these as "principales 6ditions" for reasons unascertainable.

But he seems totally unaware of even

the capital French edition, an adaptation by Fouquelin, one of the earliest French rhetorics.

The present inven-

tory lists over 1$0 editions, any number of them more "principales" than Waddington's three, one of which apparently never really existed at all.

Heretofore, studies

of Ramism—which at present fall largely within the ambit

[2]

o f E n g l i s h and American l i t e r a t u r e - - h a v e been unable even t o begin to e s t a b l i s h the c o n d i t i o n of a t e x t .

In h e r 19$0

e d i t i o n o f Abraham F r a u n c e ' s Arcadian R h e t o r l k e , Miss E t h e l Seaton has e x p l a i n e d how she has had t o l i m i t h e r d i s c u s s i o n o f the provenience o f t h i s a d a p t a t i o n o f t h e Talon R h e t o r i c by f o c u s i n g upon some e d i t i o n s s e l e c t e d as d i p l o m a t i c a l l y as p o s s i b l e in the absence o f a r e l i a b l e g u i d e .

In an a r t i c l e ,

" H i l t o n , Ramus, and Edward P h i l l i p s , " Modern P h i l o l o g y ,

XLVII

( 1 9 ^ 9 ) , 6 3 - 8 9 , J . Milton French has c o n j e c t u r e d about the immediate o r i g i n s o f John M i l t o n ' s Kamist L o g i c , but has had t o c o n t e n t h i m s e l f with ei,-;ht e a r l i e r e d i t i o n s , chosen again without a g u i d e .

The date 1$67 has become c u r r e n t as the

p u b l i c a t i o n date f o r the Talon R h e t o r l c a , a s , among o t h e r p l a c e s , in Miss Rosemond Tuve's E l i z a b e t h a n and Metaphysical Imagery (1914-7)» P · 3 3 9 , n . 1 0 .

The p r e s e n t Inventory makes

i t c l e a r t h a t t h e r e were over twenty e d i t i o n s b e f o r e 15&7· Wilbur Samuel Howell's i n v a l u a b l e Logic and R h e t o r i c England, 1 5 0 0 - 1 7 0 0 l i s t s

in

( p . 2 0 8 ) two F r a n k f o r t e d i t i o n s

of

Ramus' D i a l e c t i c with George Downham's commentary (an immediate source f o r M i l t o n ' s L o g i c ) , whereas no l e s s than f i v e

Frank-

f o r t e d i t i o n s appear h e r e . Ramus' work c o n n e c t s d i r e c t l y b o t h w i t h s c h o l a s t i c i s m and with the humanist t r a d i t i o n .

His works thus have a spread

o f a s o r t which those o f many o f h i s c o n t e m p o r a r i e s , Erasmus [3]

included, do not have.

While his most important work is the

Dialectic, this /fork appears as one of a huge galaxy of works which control one another's orbits and which are consequentlyall given here.

There are few authors of the Renaissance

with as many works so often reprinted as Ramus' are, so that an Inventory such as this should give an unusually full picture of the total impact a Renaissance man could have on his age, making it possible, it would seem, to improve our assessment of a variety of phenomena in Western cultural history.

Here we find, for example, that in this post-

scholastic movement which nominally proclaims death to Aristotle and to all that he stood for, the ratio of dialectic or logic texts to rhetoric texts remains over three to two In favor of dialectic or logic.

Or again, the relation of

the vernacular to the Latin tradition is here documented with a clarity hard to come by elsewhere and all the more telling because of the fact that Ramiam was the vanguard of the vernacular movement in northern Europe.

The notes

with the editions of the Rhetorlca and the Dialectlea here show in how many cases the first rhetorics and dialectics or logics in English, French, Dutch, German, and even Hungarian, were Ramist works, and the titles listed show rather definitively the infinitesimal part of iormal linguistic training which such vernacular works represent

ik)

as compared to Latin through even the late Renaissance. Finally, there is the curious fact that editions of classical works are much more limited by national boundaries than are books on the "arts"—not only dialectic and rhetoric but also arithmetic.

Teachers who conflated

their prelections or explanations of texts from sources kept out of pupils' hands were likely to have printed for the same pupils a standard manual of an art, perhaps with slight adaptations of their own.

One interesting corollary

of this fact is that the continuity of Renaissance culture is, at its hard core, in some ways due more to the arts than to the classics. Various observations and generalizations drawn from these and similar facts brought to light by this Inventory are discussed in the body of the work which this Inventory accompanies.

They compel re-examination

of many of our notions of the Renaissance, showing how, despite all the humanist fine talk in favor of eloquence, dialectic, not rhetoric, tends to remain the dominant factor in Renaissance linguistic, at least at the level of conscious cultivation.

The medieval dialectical em-

phasis thus well outweighs the classical rhetorical heritage when the accounts are cast up in these basic terms. The origins of modern encyclopedism and rationalism as the development, through Ramism, of medieval arts [5J

course scholasticism i s another phenomenon which can be traced in the t i t l e s here (see e s p e c i a l l y the Artes c o l lectae).

Some origins of the post-Copernican notion that

there i s such a thing as a philosophical "system"—30 important both in the Kantian and in the anti-Kantian camps—can likewise be traced through the t i t l e s here, together with the incubation of this and similar notions in Germany by German Ramists, art-of-memory experts (such as A l s t e d ) , chemists (such as Andreas Libavius or Libau). The Inventory likewise makes c l e a r t h a t , even in the Spanish peninsula, the c o d i f y i n g of a l l theology and philosophy in the Renaissance manuals—which are quite d i f f e r e n t things from medieval summae—was preceded by the work of the f i r s t evangelist of Ramism outside France, Francisco Sanchez de las Brozas (see under Dial e c t i c a P. Rami et Rhetorica A. Talaei in the c o l l e c t e d works h e r e ) .

This raises i n t e r e s t i n g questions concern-

ing the impulses producing the most famous of a l l

series

of Renaissance theology manuals in Spain and Portugal, those by the professors at Alcalfl. de Henares (the Complutensea) and those by the Coimbra professors (the Conimbricenses), f o r Sanchez· case reminds us that the Parisian influence, so strong in Spain toward the midsixteenth century, could have a Ramist coloring deriving

[6]

either from Ramus himself or collaterally from Ramus' source, Rudolph Agricola, to whom Melchior Cano's work on the theological loci traces directly, and even sometimes wor d-fο r-wo rd. Sanchez de la Brozas had some brushes with the Spanish Inquisition.

Notes attached to a ftw editions

of the Rhetorlca and the early dialectical works here (Inventory numbers 16, 20, 72, 103) throw some light on the relations of the Inquisition and Ramism—relations which may be characterized as usually precarious, but seldom completely deteriorated.

2.

Bibliographical Value

In addition to its value in the study of intellectual and cultural history, it is hoped, of course, that despite its inevitable limitations, this Inventory will also be of primary and direct bibliographical value to librarians and all those who have to deal with the tangle of Ramist editions.

Without attempting detailed biblio-

graphical description, the listings do pretend to exactness and completeness in brief form.

Where necessary,

entries are expanded beyond the ordinary brief form so as to distinguish editions and issues which would otherwise be confused. [7]

The contents of every work can be ascertained from the listings h e r e — a s mentioned elsewhere, when the contents of a particular edition are not given or are not clear from the title, they are to be found under an earlier listing of the same title.

Every work printed

in any edition listed under the Collected Works is crossreferenced under the Individual Works, which are chronologically arranged.

Thus, by running the eye down the

listings under Dialectlea, one finds in temporal sequence every edition of the Dialectic or Logic, including the editions which did not appear separately but in collected editions of one sort or another. Indeed, the Inventory should go further than merely aiding in the identification of editions.

It

should serve, to a great extent, the purpose of a modern edition of all Ramus' works as well as of Talon's.

There

is one reasonably complete edition of Talon, but of it I have been able to locate only eight copies.

No complete

edition, and no reasonably complete selected edition, of Ramus has ever appeared to serve as a point of reference for his works.

It is unlikely that one ever will.

The

bulk of Ramus' published writing—not to mention a few scattered unpublished letters—is overawing, the value of the separate items extremely variable, and the fact that

[8]

they are in Latin discouraging.

S t i l l , under one or

another aspect, Ramus' works, and Talon's as well, are often of paramount importance in the history of ideas and of culture.

I t i s hoped that with individual copies

of each edition in the great European l i b r a r i e s and in many American l i b r a r i e s here catalogued, modern microfilming f a c i l i t i e s or perhaps occasional i n t e r - l i b r a r y loans will make the procuring of any desired i s s u e a matter of simple correspondence.

3»

Major New Discoveries

Regarding the canon of Ramus' and Talon's writings, the present Inventory presents, besides a d e f i n i t i v e b a s i s for studying the i n t e r r e l a t i o n of the various editions and of the development of Ramist thought, a number of major individual discoveries which are treated in d e t a i l under the individual works in question but some of which can be b r i e f l y l i s t e d here. tributions are cleared up.

Various f a l s e a t -

The question of the autho-

ship of the Rhetorlca published under the name of Talon i s here aired for the f i r s t time in centuries.

The

hitherto unconfirmed report that an edition of Ramus' celebrated P l a l e c t l c a e partltlones appeared in 151^6 in Paris

[9]

under T a l o n ' s name i s h e r e v e r i f i e d by t h e d i s c o v e r y of a c t u a l l y e x t a n t c o p i e s in Bologna and ( p r o b a b l y ) Munich. One of t h e f i r s t French r h e t o r i c s — t h e 1555 e d i t i o n by Antoine F b u q u e l i n — i s now i d e n t i f i e d c l e a r l y f o r what i t is:

not only on a d a p t a t i o n of t h e Talon R h e t o r i c a b u t a l s o

t h e h i g h l y important companion p i e c e t o Ramus' French D i a l e c t i q u e of t h e same y e a r , and one of t h e f i r s t French r h e t o r i c s in p r i n t . By Waddington and o t h e r s , t h e Algebra had been thought t o be a work p u b l i s h e d by Ramus only posthumously. A 1560 anonymous e d i t i o n — t w e l v e y e a r s b e f o r e Ramus' death—is here I d e n t i f i e d . Ramus' i n f l u e n c e on t h e Moravian e d u c a t i o n a l r e f o r m e r Comenaky o r Comenius (1592-1671) has been known through Comensky's r e l a t i o n s w i t h Johann H e i n r i c h A i s t e d , h i s Ramist t e a c h e r in C e n t r a l Germany.

The p r e s e n t

Inven-

t o r y r e p o r t s a Rami3t Greek grammar which was p u b l i s h e d a t Prague in 1602 under Moravian a u s p i c e s and which h i n t s t h a t t h e Ramist i n f l u e n c e on Comensky was p r o b a b l y n o t l i m i t e d t o , and perhaps a n t e r i o r t o , c o n t a c t with Alsted. In g e n e r a l , t h e r e l a t i o n of t h e D l a l e c t l c a — a n d t h u s of Rarolst method—to t h e o t h e r works i n t h e Hamist canon and t o t h e development of Ramism a f t e r Ramus1 d e a t h [10]

is now clearly charted.

The Inventory also makes possible

the study of the Ramist controversies referred to in so many current works but hitherto entirely baffling regarding the sequence of works involved.

A further appendix,

"The Ramist Controversies," based on and supplementing the Inventory, provides the much needed information on this sequence.

ii.. Coverage of This Inventory This Inventory lists all editions of Ramus' works of which I have been able to find either copies or record. It gives also the location of copies of each work of which surviving copies could be found. By far the richest collections of Rameana are in European libraries.

The European libraries listed below

and some few American libraries (those of Harvard, Yale, and Columbia Universities, and the Boston and New York Public Libraries) have been checked systematically for works catalogued as by Ramus and Talon.

However, not all

these libraries have been so exhaustively checked for the manifold works of these men appropriated by others and catalogued under, others' names by cataloguers unaware of the state of affairs--for example, under the names of Alsted

[11]

or Butler or Dugard.

An effort haa been made to find all

such works, and all the editions possible of such works, but I have generally been content with listing a few copies of each edition without running all these authors through absolutely all the library catalogues.

In American libraries

other than those just mentioned, only incidental copies which have come to my attention are reported.

For the few

volumes in this Inventory appearing from the late eighteenth century on, no attempt is made in any case to record more than a copy or two. A work such as this can never hope to be absolutely complete.

Even at the very end of a long trek through more

than a hundred libraries, editions of Ramus of which I had no record were still turning up, although with a relatively low rate of frequency.

The trail of editions becomes par-

ticularly elusive toward the end of the Ramist age when minor schoolmasters take to putting out editions or adaptations of Ramist works, especially the Dialectic, Rhetoric, and Arithmetic, under their own names with no mention of Ramus or Talon.

It is in this area that most of the editions

missing in this list will be found.

I feel quite certain,

for example, that I have not been able to run down all the editions or adaptations of the Ramist Rhetoric issued in iängland under Dugard·s own name or in Germany under Dietrich's

[12]

or of the Ramist Dialectic issued in the Netherlands under Ivendelin's name, or of the Ramist Arithmetic issued in Germany under Buscher's.

A painstaking study of the huge

mass of extant writing of the Ramists and syncretists whose names are listed toward the end of this volume would doubtless yield a sizable increment of further editions or adaptations published without Ramus' or Talon's name.

This

increment would be lese in England than elsewhere, since I have been able to check my findings for England against those of Wilbur Samuel Howell, in his Logic and Rhetoric in England, 1500-1700 ( 1 9 5 6 ) .

But even so welcome a work,

while making it possible to bring this tally of editions to its present completeness, does not malte it possible to perfect the tally.

For, exhaustive as it is in its field,

Professor Howell's book covers rhetoric and logic only, and that not beyond 1700 (there were several British editions of Dugard's Ramist rhetoric after this date), and even of the editions before 1700 Professor Howell does not mention absolutely all (for example, the I673 seventh edition of the Dugard rhetoric in the British Museum or the I679 and 1680 printings of the ninth edition in the University of Illinois Library). On the basis of the steadily diminishing returns as this Inventory was terminated, one might hazard the guess

[133

that in all the countries together where Ramism appears there is perhaps a total of about two hundred further printings which might qualify as editions or adaptations of one or another of Ramus' and Talon's works and which are not included here.

But almost all these—except, I should

conjecture, a half-dozen or so—would have appeared with no clear indication of the fact that they were basically by Ramus or Talon and would, moreover, present Ramus' and Talon's work more or less contaminated from non-Ramigt sources.

In this sense they are minor editions.

No

doubt, of some of these editions there remain no copies extant, although evidence of the edition may remain—for example, one encounters title-pages reading "Sixteenth Edition" when one is unable to find an extant copy of each of the previous fifteen. Nevertheless, despite these limitations, since I have examined all works which I have found and which sounded as though they might contain a Ramist text, eliminating those which do not, when a work which might be an edition or adaptation,of one of Ramus' or Talon's works Is not listed here, there is some reason for assuming that it does not contain Ramus' or Talon's original work ——even if it does have the name of one or the other on the title-page—but that it either simply

UW

speaks about the work or, at most, comments on the work systematically without reproducing it. Where a title or an edition or adaptation is given, but no copy is listed, search has failed to disclose a copy.

In euch cases, the source of my informa-

tion concerning the existence of the edition is always given.

Similarly, when I have been unable to resolve a

doubt concerning one or another item, the doubtful material is enclosed in square brackets and queried. The entries from German libraries represent a particular problem.

In Germany, World War II left much

destroyed or unaccounted for, or stored away in cases and in various stages of recataloguing.

Much about the

post-war.condition of German libraries, even in Eastern Germany, can be gathered from Georg Leyh, Die deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken nach dem Krieg (Tübingen: J. 0. B. Mohr and Paul 3iebeck, 191+7) > which I have found extraordinarily reliable. The libraries in Eastern Germany have been, of course, closed to the Western world.

Their pre-war

holdings are in part included here through such media as the Abteilung Sammelkatalog in the Stadt- und Universitätsbibliothek at Frankfort-on-the-Main.

The two large Berlin

libraries, the Universitätsbibliothek and the Oeffentliche

[15]

wissenschaftliche Bibliothek (formerly the Freussische Staatsbibliothek) are a special problem. the Ostsektor.

They are both in

A great number of the most valuable books

from the latter are at present in the deposit at the Westdeutsche Bibliothek In Marburg (Iahn), but the principal catalogue for these books is in the Oeffentliche wissenschaftliche Bibliothek in Berlin.

At the end of May,

1952, I visited these two Berlin libraries, where I was told that I should be allowed to work.

However, certain

grave difficulties presented themselves, with the result that I did not work in these libraries after all.

The

holdings of the Berlin Universitätsbibliothek and Oeffentliche wissenschaftliche Bibliothek are therefore not listed here.

Moreover, the cards in the latter library

from which is being edited the huge S&mnelkatalog of German libraries, so far In print only through the first letters of the alphabet, have not been consulted.

(However, other

union catalogues for German libraries have been consulted, as the list of libraries below shows.)

Similarly, the main

catalogue in Berlin for the deposit at Marburg has not been oonaulted, but from scattered subject catalogues on hand at Marburg a certain number of the Marburg volumes are listed.

[16]

5.

Abbreviations and Form o f Kntrles

In making a w o r k - l i s t such as the p r e s e n t ,

fea-

turing mostly Renaissance Latin t i t l e s and yet of i n t e r e s t c h i e f l y to those who are not p r o f e s s i o n a l L a t i n i s t s ,

the

problem of c l a r i f i c a t i o n - - w h i c h f o r i n f l a t e d Renaissance Latin t i t l e s includes abbreviation--must be f a c e d . In the Table of Contents and a t the beginning o f the e n t r i e s f o r each work, Latin t i t l e s are given English equivalents. In abbreviating the t i t l e s , the following procedure has been followed.

L i s t i n g s have been kept t o the

t i t l e s proper, to the exclusion o f t i t l e - p a g e mottoes and other i n c i d e n t a l m a t e r i a l .

In the oase o f f i r s t

editions,

or f o r other p a r t i c u l a r reasons, g r e a t e r f u l l n e s s has been allowed where s p e c i a l i n t e r e s t a t t a c h e s to the wording, but in repeated e n t r i e s o f the same t i t l e , a f t e r the f i r s t

full

entry the subsequent e n t r i e s are in abridged form. Ramus' name ( o r , in the Talon s e c t i o n o f the i n ventory, Talon's name), together with the cumbersome hono r i f i c i d e n t i f i c a t i o n s often a t t a c h i n g to i t — P e t r i Rami r e g l i eloquentlae e t phllosophlae p r o f e s s o r i s ,

etc.—has

been r e g u l a r l y omitted except f o r f i r s t editions or at other times when some s p e c i a l s i g n i f i c a n c e or helpfulness [17]

attaches to the name and/or title, or when the occurrence of other proper names in the title makes the inclusion of Ramus' name necessary for clarity.

Except for first edi-

tions, the Petrus Ramus (or Petri Rami, as the case may be) is regularly abbreviated to P. Ramus (P. Rami, etc.), and the name of Audomarus Talaeus (or Audomari Talaei) to A. Talaeus (or A. Talaei, etc.).

Except in the case

of these abbreviations of Ramus' and Talon's (and of Cicero's and Virgil's) first names, ellipses (. . .) are used to indicate any omissions between the words of the titles given here, but not for the omission of Ramus' and Talon's names and honorific titles when these precede the words of the title as given here. Since such omission of Ramus' or Talon's name to simplify title entries makes anonymous editions otherwise unidentifiable, these are all marked with an asterisk, which in the Ramus section of the Inventory means that the connection with Ramus is not evident from the title-page, and in the Talon section that the connection with Talon is not thus evident.

The "ad Carolum Lotharingum Cardinalem,"

or "ad celeberrimam et illustrissimam Lutetiae Parisiorum Academiam," etc., occurring as dedications after the title proper are given the first time they occur in a series of titles but after that are omitted and their place supplied

[18]

by elipses (. . .).

With these exceptions, all proper

names on the title pages (including Talon's in the ttamus section of the Inventory and Ramus' in the Talon section of the Inventory) are always given—those of printers, etc., not excepted.

Geographical cognomina which are not

really a part of a name—e.g., the "Cantabrigensis" when William Temple is styled "Guilielmus Tempellus Cantabrigensis"--are regularly omitted just as they commonly are in library catalogues

(ellipses supplied), except

for first occurrences in a series.

Conversely, in Latin

titles, all abbreviations—which today only add to the general mystification--are regularly expanded with the aid of square brackets.

However, Cicero's and Virgil's

full names, Marcus Tullius Cicero and Publius Virgiliua Maro are regularly abbreviated to the forms Μ. T. Ciceronis and P. Vlrgilii Maronis (in the genitive case in which they usually occur), even when not so abbreviated in the full original titles. In anything less than a strictly technical and complete bibliographical description which would follow the title-page line for line and letter for letter and which would be far too cumbersome for the present purpose, it is impossible to maintain the use of capitals, and hence the variant uses of "i," "J," "u," "ν," "I,"

[19]

"J," "U," "V" found on tit-le-pages.

Here the spelling

of the original has, of course, always been adhered to, but the use of these letters, of capitals, and of punctuation—so necessary in cutting a path of intelligibility through the undergrowth of verbiage—is conformed to present-day practice for Latin.

For the letters "i,"

"J»" "u," and "v" the practice of the Teubner Latin texts is followed.

The ampersand (&) in Latin titles, which

is, after all, only a ligature for e£, is regularly ,, rendered et.

Roman numerals in the titles proper are

expanded to their full Latin forms to facilitate citation by clearing up ambiguities ("Lib. IX" could mean either nine books or Book Nine; "Liber I," either one book or Book the First).

These expansions, and in general all

expansions of signs, are italicized (whereas square brackets are used for supplied rather than expanded material, as when the rest of a full name is supplied after an initial).

However, in the case of publication

dates, etc., when roman numerals are replaced by their equivalent in arabic numerals, these are not italicized. Information regarding publisher, place, and date haa been kept to the shortest possible form, prepositions or prepositional phrases (apud, ex offlcina, etc.) as well as explicatory phrases, addresses, and thq like being

[20]

regularly omitted and only proper names given, except where necessary to distinguish the relationship of two or more persons.

Printers' or publishers' names thus

appear, where possible, in the nominative case to facilitate reference to them on the part of the growing nunto er of scholars not entirely at home with Latin.

This information

can be regarded as coming from the title-page, or, in default of that, from the colophon, unless it is bracketed, in which case it is supplied from elsewhere in the book (such as from a dated preface in the case of first editions) or from some reliable outside source.

In the interests of

brevity, the first names of the following well-known Renaissance printers and publishers, of very frequent occurrence here, have been regularly reduced to initials: G. (Guilielmus) Antonius, I. (Ioannes) Aubrius, M. (Matthaeus) David, i£. (.aUsebius) Episcopius, CI. (Claudius) Marnius, and A. (Andreas) Wechelus or A. (Andr6) Wechel. For other printers and publishers, of less frequent occurrence, the full form of the name has been retained or even supplied (in square brackets) in order to facilitate Identification of these often more obscure men.

In the

information regarding publication, omissions are not indicated by ellipses, but anything supplied is bracketed. The names of all individuals given on the title-page or

[21]

in the colophon as having -to do with p u b l i c a t i o n a r e r e g u l a r l y noted. Although complete c o l l a t i o n of s i g n a t u r e s i s not included in the scope of t h e p r e s e n t I n v e n t o r y , i t

is

e s s e n t i a l t h a t the Inventory f u r n i s h some notion of the s i z e and bulk of the volumes i t l i s t s .

The format and

number of pages o r of leaves i s thus given, with f u l l a p p r e c i a t i o n of t h e l i m i t a t i o n s of t h i s procedure from the purely b i b l i o g r a p h i c a l p o i n t of view, but with Recogn i t i o n t h a t t h i s Inventory i s r a t h e r a p a r a - b i b l i o g r a p h i c a l document concerned d i r e c t l y r a t h e r with the h i s t o r y of i d e a s .

The i n d i c a t i o n of format (l^to, 6vo, e t c . )

r e f e r s to the s i z e and to the g a t h e r i n g s in t h e body of the book--where a c o n f l i c t between t h e two has been noted, i t i s i n d i c a t e d (1ft ο in 0>s, e t c . ) . For m a t t e r here encountered in the d e s c r i p t i o n of the contents of a work or an e d i t i o n , e s p e c i a l l y such terms as " l o g i c a l a n a l y s i s , " "argument,"

"dialectical

sunina" or " d i a l e c t i c a l summary," and the l i k e , t h e r e a d e r i s r e f e r r e d f o r explanation t o t h e p r e s e n t a u t h o r ' s Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue, which appears c o n j o i n t l y with t h e present work. Regarding t h e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of f i r s t

editions,

i t should be noted t h a t many works of Hamus1 appearing [22]

later than 1 5 5 7 c a r r y a r e f e r e n c e to a P r i v i l e g i u m , a kind of copyright

by royal e d i c t , d a t e d 3 Id. lun.

As Waddlngton n o t e s , p . 456»

this is the date of

g e n e r a l P r i v i l e g i u m given Ramus

the

for a l l h i s w o r k s ,

those not y e t . p u b l i s h e d o r even w r i t t e n .

This

powerful

influence at c o u r t , a fact w h i c h has been p l a y e d

romantic

even

grant,

incidentally, shows Ramus as a man o f u n u s u a l l y

Waddlngton

1557·

down

by

Works are a r r a n g e d In g r o u p i n g s

by

and others in the effort to m a k e h i m a

revolutionary. The Collected

types o f s u b j e c t - m a t t e r ,

the I n d i v i d u a l Works

in

the

c h r o n o l o g i c a l order o f t h e i r first p r i n t e d e d i t i o n s . either c a s e , the editions g r o u p e d u n d e r e a c h or w o r k are arranged in c h r o n o l o g i c a l year, the o r d e r is: w i t h other w o r k s .

collection

order.

In any

one

1) separate editions, 2) editions Within e a c h of these last two

the order is alphabetic

by place of publication,

groupings, Editions

of the same y e a r and same place are a r r a n g e d 1 ) those no editor; 2 ) those a n o n y m o u s l y

edited; 3 ) those

c o m m e n t a t o r ; I4.) within any o f these last three tions, a l p h a b e t i c a l l y by p u b l i s h e r o r In the C o l l e c t e d

[23]

or

classifica-

printer.

Works, the c o n t e n t s are

A f t e r the c o n t e n t s are g i v e n

with

edited

or c o m m e n t e d on by a n o t h e r , a l p h a b e t i c a l l y b y editor

given.

In

the first

always

time,

they

remain the same for subsequent editions with the same title unless otherwise noted.

In the Individual Works,

contents of key editions or of other editions are given when they aeem necessary or helpful.

[2k]

SIGNS AND ABBREVIATIONS Italicized entry numbers—e.g., 131«.— Indicate an edition In which Ramus' text is notably altered or curtailed by another (such as, for example, one finds when an editor amalgamates Ramus 1 Dialectic with Melanchthon or Aristotle) or editions which are otherwise radically adapted by editors, as when Ramus' text is dichotomized in bracketed outlines. When Ramus' text occurs with a commentary kept distinct from the text itself, the entry number is not italicized.

Because of the varying ways of entering

these amalgamations in library catalogues and because of the unequal value or total absence of crossreference systems in the older library catalogues, a complete check of copies of these amalgamations or adaptations is not guaranteed here; mostly, only strategically located copies are recorded. Anonymous edition—i.e., Ramus 1 name (in the Ramus section of the Inventory—Talon's name in the Talon section of the Inventory) does not appear on the title-page of the book, or in the case of collections by various authors, of the work by Ramus or Talon Included in the book. Italicized library symbols--e.g., Lbm, MH--indicate that the copy in the library in question has been individu-

[25]

ally examined and that it is the copy, or one of the copies, OD which the description is based. ?

An ambiguous catalogue entry in cases where there is only the catalogue entry to go on, at least for the present·

This condition obtains in many of the

German libraries, which are still being reconstituted after the ravages of World War II. +

Erroneously entered in library catalogue; entry is oorrect as given here.

( ) Defective copy.

E.g., (Lbm).

t ] Copy which the library cannot locate or which is temporarily unavailable (hence entry from catalogue only). be

E.g., [Dm],

Copy as recorded in Georglue Draudius, Blbllotheca fclaasica. (Prancofurti ad Moenum:

Balthasar

Ostern, 1625), pp. 1317-18, 131*1-1*4, Uj.ll» etc. Listings in this remarkably oompendioua work are not always reliable, but I include most editions cited in it even when I find no traces of extant copies because so many of the entries in this work which I first regarded as suspect turned out to be remarkably accurate.

[26]

be

Copy as recorded in Georgius Draudius, Blbllotheca exotica, a supplement to the Blbllotheca classica, Just mentioned under "be," of which the present supplement forms the final section, but with separate pagination.

π

Microfilm copy. Edition or copy as recorded in Jean-Pierre Niceron, M^molres pour servlr & l'hlatoire des hommea illustres dans la rtpubllque dea lettres; avec un catalogue ralsonnfe de leurs ouvrages (Paris:

Briasaon,

1729-^5)* XIII (1730), 259-304, and XX (1732), 64. This work is quite inaccurate, but the number of entries from it here unverified elsewhere is very limited. Photostat copy. s

Edition as listed in David Eugene Smith, Rara Arlthmetlca (Boston:

Ginn and Co., 1908).

Many of

Smith's entries, but not all, were, aa of 190Ö, in the library of George Arthur Plimpton of New York, now incorporated in the library at Columbia University, New York. se

Edition as recorded in Bernard Gotthelff .Struve, Blbllothecae phllosophlcae Struvianae emendatae [271

. . . a Lud[ovico] Marco Kahlio . . . Tonus I . Tomus II (Gottingen, 1740). table

Oils term means always a folding chart giving bracketed Ramist outlines of the art or subject in question. These outlines are of extremely frequent occurrence through Ramist works but are not specially noted when they appear on the ordinary pages but only when in these folding additions to the book (which are often missing in individual copies).

w

Edition aa recorded in Charles Waddington, Ramus: sa vie, aesftcrlts,ses opinions (Paris:

Charles

Meyrueis et Cie, 1Ö55), pp. l+lj.1-77· Note that in Waddington the present BibliothSque Nationale in Paris is referred to under its former title as the Bibliotheque Imperiale. Waddington ζ

References by this name are to this same work.

Edition as recorded in Johann Heinrich Zedier, Universal-Lexicon, 50 vols, and (Leipzig and Halles

supplementary vols.

Johann Heinrich Zedier, 1732-

Ä). The meaning of other abbreviations used should be evident from the context. Referenc θ Is made to the sources here given only [28]

in cases where direct evidence for the existence of an edition, in the form of an extant copy of the work in question, has not been found. If editions listed in any of the above works are omitted from the Inventory, it is for some positive reason arguing their non-existence (e.g., Waddington cites quite a few editions as known to him only from catalogue entries in the Bibliotheque Imperiale—now the Bibliothfcque Nationale—which do not appear in the printed catalogue, baeed on cataloguing corrections made since Waddington's day). The presence of more than one copy of an edition in any one library is indicated by repeating the library symbol for each additional copy. American libraries are designated by the standard symbols used in the Union List of Serials.

With two ex-

ceptions here (DFo and MHi), these American library symbols terminate in capital letters.

All other symbols

terminate in lower-case letters and are for Buropean libraries. Some Cambridge and Oxford college libraries I have consulted only through the union catalogues of early editions in preparation at Trinity College, Cambridge, under the direction of Mr. Η. M. Adams, and at the Bodleian Library in Oxford under the direction of Mr. F. J. King. [29]

Apart from this, unless otherwise indicated, entries from European libraries are all from personal visits I have made to the libraries in question, with the exception of those libraries whose names are accompanied in the list of abbreviations by one or another of the following symbols. (cc)

Entries from Centrale Catalogue, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, The Hague.

(fsc)

Entries from the Abteilung Sammelkatalog for German libraries at the Stadt- und Universitätsbibliothek, Frankfort-on-the-Main.

Only

unique or rare copies from this catalogue are noted here.

Many of the copies, including, in

all likelihood, some noted here, were destroyed in World War II. (Pbn-o)

Entries from the printed catalogues of provincial French libraries in the catalogue room of the Bibliothique Nationale, Paris.

Most of these

catalogues are from the nineteenth century, and they are not always accurate.

There are rela-

tively few entries from them here. (r)

Entries from Repertoire des ouvrages pfedagogiques du XVIe sl&cle:

Blblloth&gues de Paris et des

Departements, preface signed by Ferdinand

[30]

Buisson (Paria:

Imprimerie Nationale, 1ÖÖ6).

This work is frequently inaccurate, but the entries from it here are negligible in number. Ramist holdings in America, as mentioned above, cannot compare with those in Europe, and the only American libraries appearing here which I have personally checked are those at Harvard, Yale, Columbia, and Princeton Universities, the Boston Public Library, the Boston Athenaeum, the New York Public Library, and St. Louis University Library.

Other American library holdings—for the number

of scattered copies is great--have been listed when I have come across them, as through the Library of Congress tracing service, William Warner Bishop's Checklist of American Copies of "Short-Title Catalogue" Books, 2d ed. (Ann Arbor, Michigan:

University of Michigan Press, 1950), and other re-

gional check lists. ALI AMu ANr Au AVc

Altenburg, Germany, Landesbibliothek (fsc) Amsterdam, Universiteits Bibliotheek Ansbach, Germany, Regierungsbibliothek (fsc) Aberdeen, University Avignon, Musle Calvet

Ba BAu Berlin: BEs BGv Big BM3 BRr BSv Bu BUs

Bologna, Biblioteca Comunale dell'Archiginnasio Basel, Universitätsbibliothek see MBw Berne, Stadtbibliothek Bourg, Prance, BibliothSque de la ville (r) Bielefeld, Germany, Gymnasium (fsc) Bremen, Staatsbibliothek (fsc) Brussels, Bibliothfeque Royale Besanijon, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) Bologna, Biblioteca Universitaria Büdingen, Germany, Schlossbibliothek (fsc) [31]

CAf CBv Coc Cch Ccl Cd Ce Cgc CHv Cj Ck Cm Cmp Cpb Cph CPT Cq CRT Csc CsJ CSmH Csa Ctc Cth CtHC CTv CtY Cu DAI

Chantilly (Oise), Prance, sAninaire Missionnalre Les Fontaines Cambrai, Bibllotheque de la ville (r) Cambridge, Corpus Christi College " · Christ's College " , Clare College " , Downing College " , Emmanuel College " , Gonville and Calus College Chaumont, Prance, Bibllotheque de la Tille (r) Cambridge, Jesus College " , King's College " , Magdalene College " , Magdelene College, Pepys Library " , Pembroke College " , Peterhouse Carpentrae, Prance, Bibllotheque de la Tille Cr) Cambridge, Queen's College Carcassonne, Bibllotheque de la Tille (r) Cambridge, St. Catharine's College " , St. John's College San Marino, California, Henry E. Huntington Library Cambridge, Sidney Sussex College " , Trinity College " , Trinity Hall Hartford, Connecticut, Case Memorial Library, Hartford Seminary Foundation Chartree, Bibllotheque de la Tille (r) New Haren, Connecticut, Yale UnlTerslty Cambridge, UnlTerslty Library

DAU DFo DLC Dm DR1 Dt

Dannstadt, Hessische Landes- und Hochschulbibliothek Washington, D.C., American UnlTerslty " " " , Folger Shakespeare Library " " " , Library of Congress Dublin, Marsh's Library Dresden, Landesbibliothek (fsc) Dublin, Trinity College

EFs Enc Eni Eu

Erfurt, Stadtbibliothek (fsc) Edinburgh, New College Edinburgh, National Library of Scotland Edinburgh, UnlTerslty

Fl

Frankfurt-am-Main, Stadtbaumelster Lucius Bibliothek (fsc) (this library was completely destroyed in World War II) Frankfurt-am-Main, Theologische Hochschule St. Georgen

Fsg

[32]

GEpu GOu GRu Gu

Geneva, Bibliotheque Publique et Univeraitaire Göttingen, Niedersächsiche Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Groningen, Universltelts Bibliotheek (oc) Glasgow, University

HAk HMm HNg Hu HVv

The Hague, Koninklijke Bibliotheek Hamburg, Mathematische Gesellschaft Hanau, Germany, Geschichtsverein (fsc) Heidelberg, Universitäts-bibliothek Le Havre, Bibliotheque de la ville (r)

Iaü ICJ ICN ICU ISN INp IU

Iowa City, Iowa, State University of Iowa Chicago, Illinois, John Crerar Library Chicago, Illinois, Newberry Library Chicago, Illinois, University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois, Northwestern University Innerpeffray, Perthshire, Scotland: Innerpeffray Library Urbana, Illinois, University of Illinois

Ku

Cologne (Köln), Universitäre- und Stadtbibliothek

LAb LAt

Lausanne, Bibliotheque Cantonale Vaudoise Lausanne, Bibliotheque de la Facultd de Theologie de l'Eglise Evangelique London, British Museum Lüneburg, Germany, Stadtbibliothek (fsc) Leyden, Bibliotheek der Rijksuniverslteit Liegnitz, Germany, Gymnasium Johanneum (fsc) Lisbon, Biblioteca da Academla das Ciencias Lisbon, Biblioteca Nacional Le Hans, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) Le Puy, Bibliotheque de la ville (r) La Rochelle, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) London, University of London Louvain, Collegium Sanctl Joannis Berchmans London, Dr. Williams's Library Lyons, Bibliotheque de la ville

Lbm LBs LEu LGj Llac LIbn LMv LPv LRv Lu LVb Lw LYv MAs MB MBA Mbn MBu MBw

Mainz, Stadtbibliothek Boston, Massachusetts, Boston Public Library Boston, Massachusetts, Boston Athenaeum Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional Marburg (Lahn), Germany, Universitätsbibliothek Marburg (Lahn), Germany, Westdeutsche Bibliothek (a large deposit from the Preussische Staatsbibliothek, called the Oeffentliche Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek, in Berlin, is stored in this library but is still largely uncatalogued, the original catalogue being in East Berlin) [33]

MCr

MXv

Manchester, England, John Rylands Library (printed catalogue) Manchester, England, University Library Baltimore, Maryland, Johns Hopkins University Middelburg, Holland, Provinciale Bibllotheek (cc) Brunswick, Maine, Bovdoin College Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Boston, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Historical Society Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Northampton, Massachusetts, Smith College St. Louis, Missouri, St· Louis University Montauban, France, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) South Hadley, Massachusetts, Mount Holyoke College Montblllard, France, Bibliotheque de la vllle (r) Munich, Staatsbibliothek Munich, Universitätsbibliothek Worcester, Massachusetts, American Antiquarian Society Meaux, Bibliotheque de la vllle

IhD IIC TO INC NNE NNTJT HPV NSchU NoD NJP

Hanover, New Hampshire, Dartmouth College Ithaoa, New York, Cornell University New York, New York Public Library New York, New York, Columbia University New York, New York, Engineering Societies1 Library New York, New York, Ublon Ideological Seminary Poughkeepsie, New York, Vaesar College Schuyler, New York, Union College Durham, North Carolina, Duke University Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University

Oaa Ob Obl Obn Occh 000 Ods Oe Oh OJ Ok 01 Om Oac Omf 0»t On Oo Opb

Oxford, All Souls· College " , Bodleian Library " , Balliol College " , Brasenose College " , Christ Church College " , Corpus Christi College 11 , Divinity School " , Exeter College " , Hertford College " , Jesus College " , Keble College " , Lincoln College " , Magdalene College " , Manchester College " , Mansfield College " , Merton College " , New College " , oriel College " , Pembroke College

MCu MdBJ MDp ΜβΒ ΜΗ MH1 M1U ANS MoSU MOv MSM MTv MUs MUu WA

[34]

Oq OrU Ose Osj Ot Ota Ou Owa Owo

Oxford, Eugene, Oxford, " , " » " > " , " , " ,

Queen'3 College Oregon, University of Oregon St. Edmund Hall St. John's College Trinity College Taylor Institute University College Wadham College Worcester College

Pa PAv PBL Pbn pbp Pi Pm pmp Ps Psc Psg PU Pv PVs PVu

Paris, Bibliotheque de 1'Arsenal Pau, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Lehigh University Paris, Bibliotheque Nationale " , Bibliotheque du Protestantieme Franyaise " , Bibliotheque de 1'Institut Franjais " , Bibliotheque Mazarine " , Mus^e P^dagogique " , Universite de Paris, a la Sorbonne " , Bibliotheque Victor Cousin{ a la Sorbonne " , Bibliotheque Sainte-Genevieve Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania Paris, Bibliotheque de la ville Padua, Biblioteca del Seminario " , Biblioteca Universitaria

Rba Rbc Rbn Rbua Rbv RDv REv RMv RNv ROg RPB

Rome, Biblioteca Angelica " , Biblioteca Casanatense " , Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale " , Biblioteca Universitaria Allessandrina " , Biblioteca Vallicelliana Rodez, Bibliotheque de la ville (r) Rennes, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) Rheims, Bibliotheque de la ville Rouen, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) Rotterdam, Gemeente-Bibliotheek (cc) Providence, Rhode Island, Brown University

SAu STcw STnu Su

St. Andrews, Scotland, University Strasbourg, Collegium wilhelmitanum Bibliotheque Nationale et Universitaire Salamanca, Universidad

TUu Tv

Tübingen, Universitätsbibliothek (fsc) Troyes, France, Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c[

Uu

Utrecht, Bibliotheek der RiJksuniversiteit

Vbv VDv Vim VIu VZm

Vatican Verdun, Vienna, Vienna, Venice,

City, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana Bibliotheque de la ville (Pbn-c) (r) Nationalbibliothek Universitätsbibliothek Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana

Wh Wit W1 WUu

Wolfenbüttel, Herzog August Bibliothek (fsc— and correspondence with the library) Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, England, town library Weimar, Landesbibliothek (fsc) Würzburg, Universitätsbibliothek (fsc)

Zp Zz

Zurich, Eidgenössisches Polytechnikum Zurich, Zentralbibliothek

(36]

I N V E N T O R Y

C O N T E N T S

with English equivalents supplied for the Latin titles and with the dates of first editions I.

Inventory Number

RAMUS: INDIVIDUAL IVORKS

Dialecticae partitiones, later called Dialecticae institutiones (1543) Aristotelicae animadversiones, later called Scholae dialecticae (1543) Oratio de studiis mathematicis (1544) Euclides (1545) Oratio in Gymnasio Praelleorum habita 1545 (1546?) Audomari Talaei Institutiones oratoriae (1545) Ciceronis Somnium Scipionis explicatum (1546) Oratio de studiis philosophies et eloquentiae coniungendis (1547) Brutinae quaestiones (1547) Audomari Talaei Rhetorica, later called Audomari Talaei Rhetoricae libri duo Petri Rami praelectionibus illustrati, or Audomari Talaei Rhetorica e Petri Rami praelectionibus observata, etc. (1548)

Rhetoricae Distinctiones in Quintilianum (1549) [37]

The Structure of Dialectic, later called Training in Dialectic Remarks on Aristotle, later called Lectures on Dialectic Address on the Study of Mathematics Euclid's Elements Address Delivered in the College of Pre sies in 1545 Training in Oratory by Omer Talon

1 18 31 34 37 38

Cicero's Dream of Scipio, Explained Address on Combining Philosophy and Eloquence Brutus' Problems

42

53

55 The Rhetoric of Omer Talon, later called Omer talon's Rhetoric in Two Books Elucidated with Explanations by Peter Ramus, or Omer Talon's Rhetoric Conformed to Peter Ramus' Explanations, etc., and by corresponding titles In various languages. 58 Evaluation of Quintilian's Rhetoric 183

Piatonis Epistolae Latinae factae et expositae (15^9) Ciceronis De fato liber expllcatus (1550) Ciceronis Epistola nona ad Publium Lentulum illustrate (1550) Pro philosophica Parisiensis Academiae discipline oratio (155D Oratio initio suae professions habita (155D Ciceronis Pro Caio Rabirio oratio illustrate (1551) Ciceronis De lege agraria orationes illustrata (1552) Ciceronis In Catilinem orationes illustratae (1554) üiceronis De legibus liber primus illustretus (1554) Arithmetice (1555) Dialectica, in French Dlalectique, also called Dialecticae libri duo, with or without the addition Audomari Talaei praelectionibus illustre ta (illustrati); also celled, after Ramus' death, Loglca; e t c ~ TT55F) Virgilii Bucolica exposita, una cum poetae vita (1555) Virgilii Georgica illustrata, later Preelections in yirgilll Georgica U 5 5 o ) Audomari-Talaei [i.e., Petri Rami] Admonitio ad Turnebum (1556) Ciceronis De optimo genera oratorum praefatio illustrate (1557) Ciceronianus (1557) 138]

Plato's Letters Translated into Latin and Explained Cicero's Treatise on Pate Explained Cicero's Ninth Letter to Publius Lentulus Elucidated Plea for Philosophy at the University of Paris Inaugural Address as Regis Professor Cicero's Plea for Rabirius Elucidated Cicero's Orations on the Farm Law Elucidated Cicero's Four Catllinerien Oretions Elucideted Cicero's First Book on Lews Elucidated Arithmetic Dialectic, also called Dialectic in Two Books, with or without the addition Elucidated with Explanetions by Omer Talon; also called, after Ramus' death.7 Logic, etc., and by corresponding titles in various languages Virgil's Bucolics Laid Open, with a Life of the Poet Virgil's Georgics Elucideted, later Explenetions of Virgil's Georgics Omer Talon's [i.e., Peter Ramus'] Warning to Turnebe Cicero's Preface on the Best Kind of Orator, Elucidated The Ciceronian

188 190 196 198 201 203 204 206 210 211

237 473

479 484 486 487

Oratio de legation®, In French Harangue toucKant ce qu'ont f a l e t l e s deputez (1557) Quod s l t unlca doctrinae instituendeθ methodua (1557) Llber de morlbus veterum Gallorum, In French, Tralcte des facons e t coustumes des anciens Galloya (1559) Llber de Caesarls m l l l t l a , In French, Traictrf de l ' a r t m l l l t a l r e , In German. Julius Caesar vom Kriegswegen Grammatlca, or Grammatlca Latina (1557) Rudlmenta grammatlcae, or Rudlmenta grammatlcae Latlnae (1559) Scholae granmaticae, Including Llbrl duo de verls sonls (1559) Algebra (1560) Grammatlca Graeca (1560) Llber de syntax! Graeca (1560) Rudlmenta grammatlcae Graecae U560) Gramere« or Grammalre, or In Latin version, Grammatlca LatlnoFranclca (1562) Prooemlum refonnandae Farlslensls Academiae, In French Advertissements sur la reformation de 1'Universltd de Paris (1562) Oratio de professlone llberallum artlum, or Oratio de sua professlone (1563) Scholae physlcae (1565) Scholae metaphyslcae (1566)

139]

Address concerning the Deputation V?3 The One and Only Method f o r Setting Forth A l l Subjects a f t e r 493 The Customs of the Ancient Gauls

Caesar's M i l i t a r y Science

Grammar, or Latin Grammar Rudiments of Grammar, or Rudiments of Eatin Grammar Lectures on Grammar, including Correct Pronunciation in Two Books Algebra Greek Grammar Greek Syntax Rudiments of Greek Grammar French Grammar

500

506 513

A3 562 $ 576

III

Kotes on the Reform of the University of Paris

Address on the Regius Professorship of Liberal Arts, or Address on His~75wn Professorship Lectures on Physics Lectures on Metaphysics

588

591 592

595

Actiones duae mathematicae (1566) Preface sur l e Proeme des math^matiques, in Latin Praefatio in t r e s primos l i b r o s [acholarum mathematicarum] (1566) Prooemium mathematicum (1567) Remonstrance au Conseil priv^ ( 1 5 6 7 — i . e . ,

1568)

Academiae P a r i s i e n s l [eplstola de decessu] (1568) Oratio de legatione secunda (1369—bat delivered in l 5 6 l ) [Scholae arithmeticae] (1569) [Scholae geometriae] (1569) Geometria (1569) Petri Rami e t Iacobi Sohecii epistolae (1569) Defensio pro A r i s t o t e l e adversus Iacobum Schecium (1571) Basilea (1571) Testamentum (1576) Conmentariorum de r e l i gione Christiana l i b r i quatuor (1576) Ciceronis pro M. Claudio Marcello o r a t i o i l l u s t r a t a (before 1582?) Aristotelis Politica Latina f a c t a ( l 6 0 1 ) [Epistolae v a r i a e ] [1μ>]

Two Pleas concerning the Regius Chair of Mathematics Preface to the Introduction to Mathematics, or Preface to the F i r s t Three Books [of Lectures on Mathematics] Introduction to Mathematics Protest to the Privy Council

598

600 603

60k

[Farewell L e t t e r ] to the University of Paris 609 Address concerning the Second Deputation a f t e r 609 [Lectures on Arithmetic] a f t e r 609 [Lectures on Geometry] a f t e r 609 Ge ome t r y öl0 Correspondence of Peter Ramus and Jakob Schegk 620 Defense of A r i s t o t l e against Jakob Schegk 621 Basle 622 Will 626 Commentary on the Christian Religion in Four Books 637 C i c e r o ' s Oration f o r Marcus Claudius Marcellus Elucidated 61jl Aristotle's Folitics Translated into Latin 6lj2 [Various L e t t e r s ] 61|3

II.

Inventory Number

RAMUS: DOÜBTFUL WORKS See also under Ramus: Individual Works, Audomari Talael Institutlones oratorlae and Audomari Talael Rhetorlca, and under Talon: Individual '.Yorks, Dlalectlcae praelectlones in Porphyrlum.

Pour un liart d'antidote (1567) Opticae libri quatuor ex voto Petri Rami conscripti

(1606)

III.

6^7 Optics in Pour Books Written at the Wish of Peter Ramus

648

RAMUS: COLLECTED WORKS

See also under Individual Works» Brutlnae quaestlones, Rhetorlcae dlstlnctlones, and Commentarlorum de rellglone Christiana libri guatuor~ Arts Professio regia [Artes collectae] Dialectica Petri Rami et Rhetorica Audomari Talae i Arithmetica, [algebra,] geometria

The Regius Professorship [Collected Arts] The Dialectic of Peter Ramus and the Rhetoric of Omer Talon Arithmetic, [Algebra , ] and

Geometry Arithmetica et algebra Arithmetica et geometria

Arithmetic and Algebra Arithmetic and Geometry

651 652

668

68I4. 686 691

Lectures on the Arts Scholae in liberales artes Scholae in tres primas liberales artes

[1^1]

Lectures on the Liberal Arts Lectures on the First Three liberal arts

695 697

Lectures on Rhetoric Training in Dialectic and Remarks on Aristotle Lectures on Mathematics

Scholae rhetorlcae Dialecticae institution® 8 et Arlstotellcae animadversionss Scholae mathematlcae

699 701 703

The Ciceronian and Lectures on the Arts The Ciceronian and Brutus' Problems

Ciceronianus et Brutinae quaestiones

707

Classical Commentarles Praelectiones in Ciceronis oratlones et scripta nonnulla In Vlrgilii Bucollca et Georglca praelectiones

Explanations of Some of Cicero's Orations and Writings Explanations of Virgil's Bucolics and Georglcs

710 716

Shorter Pieces Collectaneae praefatlones, epistolae, oratlones Petri Rami et Audomari Talaei Eplstolae variae

Collected Prefaces« Letters» and Creations of Peter Ramus and Omer Talon Various Letters

717 720

Excerpts, Etc. Varia

IV.

Varla

722

The Three Parts of Commentaries. . . of the Clvlll Warree of France

72If

RAMUS: SPURIOUS WORKS

[Serres, Jean de.]

[1|2]

V.

RAMUS: SUPPLEMENT OF LOST AND UNEDITED WORKS [Ramus· Own Work in Manuscript] [Adaptations of Ramus' Work by others in Manuscript]

VI.

725 731

TALON; INDIVIDUAL WORKS

Oratio [de studiis rhetor i c i s ] (151*4) Institutionen oratoriae (1545) Dialecticae preelect i o n s in Porphyrium (1547) Academia (1547) In Academicum Ciceroni s fragmentum explicatio (1547) Rhetorica, l a t e r called Rhetoricae l l b r i duo Petri Rami praelectionibus I l l u s t r a t i v or Rhetorica e Petri" Rami praelectionibus observe t a , e t c . (154®) In Lucullum Ciceronis conmentarii (1550) In primum A r i s t o t e l i s Ethicum explicatio or praelectiones (1550T~ Ciceronis Topica explicate, or i l l u s t r a t a (1550)— Ciceronis Partitiones oratoriae i l l u s t r a t a e , or Ciceronis De par^Ttione oratoria dialogue i l l u s t r a t a (1551) Ciceronis Paradoxa explicate (1551)

Address [on the Study of Rhetoric] a f t e r 733 Training in Oratory a f t e r 733 Dialectical Explanations of Porphyry The Academy Explanation of the Fragment of Cicero's Academia Rhetoric» l a t e r called Rhetoric in Two Books Elucidated with Explanations by Peter Ramus, or Rhetoric Conformed to Peter Ramus' Explanations, e t c . , and by corresponding t i t l e s in various languages. Conmentaries on Cicero's Lucullus Explanation of the F i r s t Book of A r i s t o t l e ' s Ethics Cicero's Topics Explained, or ElucidatecT" Cicero's Divisions of Oratory Explained

Cicero's Paradoxa Explained

[43]

734 a f t e r 737 a f t e r 737

a f t e r 737 a f t e r 737 738 739

741 743

C i c e r o ' s Three Dialogues on the Orator Elucidated 7^5

Ciceronis De oratore dialogl tres i l l u s trate (1553) P e t r i Rami D i a l e c t i c a e l i b r i duo, Audomari Talaei p r a e l e c t i o n i bus i l l u s t r a t e , e t c . (1556) —

VII.

Peter Ramus' D i a l e c t i c in Two Books, Elucidated with Explanations by Omer Talon, e t c . a f t e r 7^5

TALON: WORKS SUPERVISED OR EDITED BY TALON

Quinque orationes de laude regiae dignit a t i s (15^8) Quinque orationes de morali philosophia A r i s t o t e l i e (1548)

VIII.

Five Orations on the Value of the Royal Station Five Orations on A r i s t o t l e ' s Moral Philosophy

747 750

TALON: DOUBTFUL WORKS

See under Talon: Individual Works, I n s t i t u t i o n s oratoriae and Rhetorica.

IX.

TALON: COLLECTED WORKS

Opera Socraticae methodicaeque philosophise s t u d i o s i s pernecessaria Praelectiones in Ciceronem, Porphyrium, A r i s totelem Opera e l e g a n t i o r i s methodicae philosophiae s t u d i o s i s pernecessaria Academia, In Academicum Ciceronis fragmentum, In Lucullum

Works Indisponsible f o r Those Desiring a S o c r a t i c and Method i c a l Philosophy Explanations of Cicero, Porphyry, and A r i s t o t l e Works Indisponsible f o r Those Desiring an Elegant Methodical Philosophy The Academy, on C i c e r o ' s Academica Fragment and Lucullus

751 752

753 755

Academia et In Academicum Ciceronis fragmentum Collectaneae praefationes, epistolae, orationes Petri Rami et Audomari Talaei

X.

The Academy, and on Cicero's Academica Fragment 757 Collected Prefaces, Letters, and Orations of Peter Ramus and Omer Talon after

TALON: SPURIOUS WORKS See under Ramus: Individual Works, Audomari Talaei Admonltlo ad Turnebum and Dlalectlcl commentarll tres authore Au5omaro Talaeo (under Dlalectica, 15^^).

[45]

TRAINING IN DIALECTIC

This i s Ramus' f i r s t reconstruction of dialectic as composed of three "parts."

At f i r s t , these parts are

natura, doctrIna, and exercltatlo, but a f t e r a few editions they become lnventio, dlsposltio, and exercltatlo--the lnventio and dlsposltlo having o r i g i n a l l y been matters f a l l i n g under doctrina.

A f t e r a few more

editions, the work i s equipped with Talon's explanations or praelectlones.

Ramus' l a t e r two-part Dlalectioa

completely supersedes the present work, out of which i t Is precipitated.

The Dialectic was to be a curt and

dogmatic, i f not invariable, classroom manual; the present work i s , on the other hand, highly oratorical, often hectic in i t s coloring. Probably the most primitive state of this work is not that represented by the f i r s t printed edition here but rather that of the Illuminated manuscript in the BibliothSque Nationale, Paris, "Petri Rami Dialecticae partition«β ad Franciacum Valeslum Christlanisslmum Gallorum regem," l i s t e d below in the Inventory under the Supplement of Lost and Unedited Works. See also Remarks on Aristotle and the Appendix, "The Ramlst Controversies."

The t i t l e D l a l e c t i c a e p a r t i t i o n e s i s t r a c e d to Strebaeus· misnomer f o r A r i s t o t l e ' s A n a l y t i c s by Ramus» opponent Jean Riolan the e l d e r , in h i s Ad Dlalectlcam Ρ [ e t r l 3 Rami una ex p r a e l e c t l o n l b u s ( P a r i s , 1 5 6 8 ) , 7—copy In the Bibllotheque Nationale,

fol.

Paris.

This work and the Remarks on A r i s t o t l e were responsible f o r the decree issued by F r a n c i s I , March 1 0 , 1514.3 ( I . e . 15M|.) a t the i n s t i g a t i o n of Ramus' f e l l o w t e a c h e r s , forbidding Ramus to teach philosophy. 1 P e t r i Rami Veromandui D l a l e c t i c a e p a r t i t i o n e s , ad celeberrlmam e t i l l u s t r i s s l m a m L u t e t i a e Parislorum Academiam.

P a r i s i i s : Iacobus Bogardus, 1 5 ^ 3 ·

8vo.

[243+85 11. Notes:

This I 3 the "prima e d i t i o "

i n Jacques Charpen-

t l e r , Anlmadversiones In l l b r o s t r e s Dialecticarum institutlonum P e t r i Rami ( P a r i s i i s : Thomas Richardus, 1 5 5 5 ) , f o l s . 19-20—copy In the Bibllotheque Paris.

Nationale,

But c f . the immediately foregoing remarks on

the MS antedating t h i s e d i t i o n . The volume i s not c l e a r l y divided i n t o sect i o n s , f o r there are no headings a t a l l , but d i a l e c t i c i s divided i n t o three p a r t s , natura, d o c t r i n a , and exercltatlo.

The t e x t does not include any examples

[47]

as in the following Dialecticae institutlones. 2 Petri Rami Veromandui Dialecticae institutlones, ad celeberrimam et illustrisaimara Lutetiae Parisiorum Academiam. 1543. Notes:

Parisiis: Iacobus Bogardus, raense septembri

θνο.

58

11.

(fol. 13 misnumbered 31)·

This is Charpentier1s "secunda editio," and the

one cited in the condemnation of Ramus by Francis I» March 10, 1543 (i.e., 151+4)·

There is no division into

books in the text itself, but a dichotomized scheme of dialectic appears on fol. 57—the first in an endless chain of Ramist dichotomized tables.

As compared with

Dialecticae partltlones (1543) preceding, the text is altered and expanded, and the various classifications ("rules") of syllogisms, etc., are illustrated with example s. In Vbv, MS Ottobonianae Latinae 2172 is a handwritten transcript of this work, obviously done from a copy of a printed edition.

The MS is written in a

beautiful, but not individually distinctive, late sixteenth-century hand, the pages ruled off neatly with large margins, and is bound in parchment from an old MS; 28.5x19 cm: v+57 numbered leaves, but the text con-

[48]

eludes on f o l . 55 v . and the rest are blank; there are catch-words at the bottom of each page, as in a printed edition.

A few scattered notes in a second hand mostly

take exception to Ramus' statements. Copies:

IU

MH NNC® Pbn

Pbp

Psc

Vbv—MS copy

(see note here)

3* Dialectlci commentarii tres authore Audomaro Talaeo editi.

Lutetiae: Ludovicus Grandinus» 15M>.

4t0·

112 pp. Contents: Notes:

see Notes.

This i s the " t e r t i a e d i t i o " which Charpentier

notes as published by Ramus under Talon's name while Raiuus was s t i l l forbidden to teach or to write on dialectic. The rarest of a l l major editions of Ramus' works, known to Waddington only through Charpentier's reference, this i s also in many ways the most important edition, since i t i s the f i r s t to give the Ramist dial e c t i c i t s d e f i n i t i v e contours and the f i r s t to treat method as such.

There are no numbered chapters, but

f o r the f i r s t time centered headings—blocked-out spatial organization within a Ramist book thus turns up simultaneously with method—and three major divisions, [lt-9]

l a t e r styled Conmentarius Conmentarius Conmentarius

"books" ( l i b r i ) , designated as follows: primus de inventione P. 3 secundus de dispositione 56 t e r t i u s de e x e r c i t a t i o n e 92

Although Ramus s t i l l f o r g e t s to make allowance f o r statement or enunciation among the operations of d i s course ( a l l he t r e a t s i s arguments or separate terms, and syllogisms), the e s s e n t i a l s of the 1555 and 1556 D i a l e c t i c are here in the f i r s t two books.

The t h i r d

book, on "use" or " e x e r c i s e , " which w i l l disappear in 1555« t r e a t s c h i e f l y 1) a n a l y s i s ; 2) obscurity and ambigu i t y and various f a l l a c i e s (despite Ramus' declared princ i p l e of not t r e a t i n g e r r o r s , he s l i p s into the usual pattern which had put A r i s t o t l e ' s S o p h i s t i c s a t the end of the Organon and t r e a t s e r r o r s a f t e r a l l at the end h e r e ) ; 3) maxims or d l g n l t a t e s or f i r s t p r i n c i p l e s , a section which r e a l l y belongs to and i s l a t e r absorbed by the section on method. Despite Ramus' s t r i c t u r e s against ambiguity, h i s present t i t l e i s an example of ambiguity unexcelled: Three Commentaries on D i a l e c t i c Published under the Authorship of Omer Talon.

The p r i n t e r ' s motto on the

t i t l e - p a g e I s an i l l - c o n c e a l e d r e f l e c t i o n on F r a n c i s

I's

condemnation of Ramus: " I n Domino p r a e s t a t , mellusque e s t f i d e r e solo quam se principibus credere m i l l e v i r i s . " There i s no introductory material a t a l l preceding the text. [50]

Copies«

Mo SU1"

Ba

Müs

Instltutionum dialecticarum libri tres, ad Carolum Lotharingum Cardinalem Guisianum.

Lutetiae: Ludovious

Grandinus, 1547» mense augustl.

8vo.

[llj.]+173+[l ]

pp. Contenta: Notea:

see Notes.

This is Charpentier1s "quarta editio."

There are no numbered chapters, but many centered headings, with the contents of the work divided as follows: Ramus' preface to Cardinal Guise Liber I, [De inventione.] Liber II, [De dispositione.] Liber III, [De exercitatione.] Noteworthy positions: "Dialectica virtus est disserendi" (p. 1).

The parts of dialectic are inventio

and dlsposltlo. Copies:

HVv

Omt

Ps£

Rbn

RDv

VIn

5 Dlalecticae institutiones ad celeberrimam et illustrissimam Lutetiae Parisiorum Academiam. baldus Paganus, 154-7· Copies:

BEs

BSv

8vo. Pm

[51]

Rbn

77 pp.

Lugduni: Theo-

6 Dlalectlcae Instltutlones.

Paris: 1548·

refer-

ences to this supposed edition which I have seen trace to Jacob Brucker (Bruckerus).

Hlstorla crltlca phlloso-

phlae, Tom. IV, Para II (Leipzig, 1766), p. 573·

7 Instltutlonum dlalectlcarum llbri tres. · . .Postroma edlto.

Parlslls: Ioannes Rolgny, 1549(colophon reads,

excudebat Matthaeus David, 13 cal. febr. 1549)·

8vo.

188+[1] pp. Notes:

This and the next two editions correspond to

Charpentler's "quarta editto." Copies:

Ob

8 Instltutlonum dlalectlcarum librl tres. . . .Postrema edltlo.

Parlslls: M. David, 1549 (colophon reads,

excudebat Matthaeus David, 13 cal. feb. 1549). 188+[1] pp. Motes: Copies:

See note with preceding edition. BAu

Pbn+

[52]

8vo.

9 Inatitutionum dialecticarum libri tres. . . .Postrema editio.

Parisiis: M. David, 1550, 8 cal. dec.

8vo.

188+[1 ] pp. Note3:

See note with edition above, Parisiis: Roigny,

154-9« Copies:

MUu?

Pbn

Rbn

Zz

10 Inatitutionum dialecticarum libri tres, Audomari Talaei praelectionibus illuatrati. . . .Parisiis: M. David, 1550. Notes:

8vo.

350+[1] pp.

This is doubtless the "quinta editio" supposed,

but not positively identified, by Charpentier.

Copies:

Gu

Ku

MUu?

NcD

Rbn

11 Inatitutionum dialecticarum libri tres, Audomari Talaei praelectionibus illuatrati. . . .Parisiis: M. David, 1552, non. ian. Notes:

8vo.

350 pp.

This and the following editions with Talon's

praelectlones before 1555 correspond to Charpentier»s "sexta editio."

f53 ]

Copies:

Dt

LIbn

Pa

Rbn

REv

Tv

12 Inatitutionum dialeotioarum libri tres . . . A. Talaei praelectionlbus lllustrati. Lugduni: Gulielmus Rovillius, 1553.

Ivo.

381 pp.

See note

with 1552 edition above. Copies:

Ba

BEa

Psg_

LRv

Müs?

MXv

Pa

13 Inatitutionum dlalectlcarum libri tres* recens sedulo recognlta et excuse. Faganus, 1553·

θνο.

Copies: MUa?

Omnia lam

Lugduni: Theobaldue

151+[1] pp.

Ybv

ill· Inetltutlonum dlalectlcarum libri tres, A. Talaei praelectionlbus lllustrati. antehac excusl.

Castignatiua multo quam

Coloniae Agrlpplnae: Gualtherus

Fabriolus, 1554*

θνο.

381 pp.

1552 edition above. Copies:

Eu

Ku

Müs

(543

Müs

Pa

See note with

15 Institutionum dialecticarum l i b r i t r e s L. Grandinus, 155J+· Notes;

[8]+288 pp.

This i s Charpentler 1 3 "septima e d l t i o . "

Copies: Uu

Parisiis:

Dt

Ob

Pa

Pbn

Rbc

RMv

STcw

V2m

16 Institutionum dialecticarum l i b r i t r e s .

. .

A.

Talaei p r a e l e c t i o n i b u s i l l u s t r a t i .

B a s i l e a e : Nicolaus

Episcopius j u n i o r , 1554·

3 7 4 + Ι Ι β ] ΡΡ·

Notes:

8vo.

The Rby copy has Ramus' name blacked out every-

where i t occurs i n the b o o k — i . e . , on a l l in a l l running heads, e t c . Copies:

BÜ

(LIbn)

title-pages,

See a l s o 2 0 , 7 2 , 1 0 3 .

MUs

Rbv

STnu

VIn.

17 Institutionum dialecticarum l i b r i t r e s . Theobaldus Paganus, 1557. Copies:

Pmp

0 In 701 ( 1 5 7 5 ) .

8vo.

. . .Lugduni:

I 5 l + [ 1 ] pp.

ο

In 702 (1766).

REMARKS ON ARISTOTLE OR LECTURES ON DIALECTIC This is a series of insistent, if captious, lectures proposing a reconstltution of all philosophy in ways contrary to the views of "Aristotelians." Ramus' Latin is here at its voluble best, entertaining and full of calculated histrionics and of a burlesque springing from warm and well-merited indignation but often based ultimately on nothing better than cold misrepresentation—Ramus was at a loss to find what was really wrong.

Enlarged, if not always clarified, in

later editions which attempt to justify earlier positions, the once brief work is, in these later editions, thereupon divided into twenty separate books and has the llbrl vlglntl added to its title.

But even then, it

undergoes further revision, as in the 1569 edition. Although they are taken as revisions here, these later productions could be considered as separate works displaying the same, or nearly the same, title as the 15^3 work. By the time this work gets to the twenty-book stage, it is organized around the Organon of Aristotle [56]

and the preliminary works, such as Porphyry's, which had accrued to the Organon—organized, that is, like the ordinary medieval or Renaissance logic course.

But this

organization is adopted by Ramus so that he can attack the course from every face it presented.

See also Train-

ing In Dialectic and The One and Only Method. 18 Petri Rami Veromandui Aristotelicae animadversiones. Parisiis: Iacobus Bogardus, mense septembri 15^3· 81

8vo.

11.

Notes:

This is the edition which figures in Francis I's

condemnation of Ramus, March 10, 1543 (i.e., I5i|4)· Copies:

ICN

IN

j,IH

NNC m

Pa

Pbn

Psc

Rbn

19 Aristotelicae animadversiones. Marcellus Bering!,

Lugduni: Godofrldus et

8vo.

128 pp. (some

mlsnumbered). Copies:

Ob

Bu

Oj

Pm

Rbn

Vbv

20 Aristotelicae animadversiones.

Lugduni: Antonius Vin-

centius, 151|5 (colophon reads, Godefridus et Marcellus [57]

Beringi, fratres, excudebant, 1545)· Notea:

8vo.

12

8 PP·

The Rbv copy has Ramus' name blacked out every-

where It occurs in the book—i.e., on all title-pages, in all running heads, etc., and is also inscribed "Petri Rami haeretici damnati."

The blacking out probably

means that the book, in sixteenth century Rome suspect because by a heretic, had been examined and Judged harmless after all—i.e., the fact that it was by Ramus did not count, so his name was struck out. Copies;

Dt

See also l6, 72,103·

Rbv

21 Animadversionum Aristotelicarum libri vlglnti: ad Carolum Lotharingum Cardinalem Guisianum.

Lutetiae: Ioannes

Roigny, 15^8 (colophon reads, excudebat Matthaeus David menae mail 15^8).

8vo.

Contents by books: --I. piis.—II.

[l6]+lj.73+[3 ] pp. De prlmis dialecticae princi-

De terminis.--III.

Porphyrii.—IV. tione.—VI. medii»—VII.

De praedicabilibua

De praedicamentis.— V. De interpreta-

De abundantla propositionum et de inventione In Posteriorum analyticorum I.—VIII.

Posterioren analyticorum II.— IX-XVI. —

XVII.

In Topica I-VIII»

In Analyticorum priorarum I . — XVIII.

Analyticorum priororum II.— XIX. exercitatione. [58]

In

In

De methodo.— XX.

De

Copies: ICu) Pbp

Psc

LIbn Psc

Müs?

Pm

Pbn

Pbn

RI.1v

22 Anlmadversionum Aristotelicarum libri viginti Lutetiae: Μ. David, 15J+8, mense mail.

. . . .

8vo.

[l6]+473+[3] PPCopies:

BAu

BEa

CHv

MUs?

Pa

Ps£

Rbn

Tv

23 Anlmadversionum Aristotelicarum libri vlglntl

. . . .

Ed. 2a. Lutetiae: Μ. David, 1549 (colophon reads, 2 cal. mar. 1550). Notes:

8vo.

375 ΡΡ·

Same titles for the individual books as in the

15^8 Roigny Paris edition above. Copies:

CRv

GU

MH

MUs

Pa

Pbn

Rbn

Tv

2k Anlmadversionum Aristotelicarum libri vlglnti Ed. 2a.

. . . .

Lutetiae: Ludovicus Grandinus, 1550 (colophon

reads, excudebat Matthaeus David, 2 cal. mar. 1550). Copies:

VZm [59 3

25 Aristotelicarum anlmadversionum l i b e r nonus e t decimu3 in P o s t e r i o r e a n a l y t i c a : ad Caroluin Lotharingum Cardinalem.

P a r i a i i s : Carolus Stephanus, 1553·

θνο.

246 pp. (some misnumbered). Notes:

These books do not correspond to the L i b . IX

and X of the foregoing e d i t i o n s but to L i b . IX and X of the following 1556-1560 e d i t i o n , of which they are an e a r l i e r redaction, revised somewhat in the 1556' and 1560 e d i t i o n s .

The preface to the present work, to the

Cardinal of Lorraine, i s dated 1553 c a l . i a n .

(i.e.,

1554)· Copies:

Pa

Pac

Rbn

26 Anlmadversionum Aristotelicarum l l b r i v l g l n t l , nunc denuim ab authore r e c o g n i t i e t a u c t l P a r i s l i s : A. Wechelus, 1556.

8vo.

. . . . [l6]+328+[8]+

271+11)1 + [ 3 ] pp. Contents:

(parts 2 , 3 , and ^ have separate

title-

pages, a l l dated 1556, but parts 3 and J4. are continuously paginated): 1) [ L l b r i I - V I I I , de C a t e g o r i i s , de I n t e r p r e t a t i o n , de Prioribus a n a l y t i c i s ] . - - 2 ) L i b r l IX e t X in Post e r i o r e a n a l y t i c a . — 3 ) L i b r i octo [XI-XVIII] in [60]

totlvdem A r i s t o t e l i s Topica.—14.> L i b r i XIX e t XX i n Elenchos Notes:

[begins on p . 9l o f l a s t

section].

The Pbn and Rbc c o p i e s — a s perhaps o t h e r s of

the c o p i e s not s t u d i e d i n d i v i d u a l l y ( i . e . , italicized)—are

thoee not

d e f e c t i v e only i n t h i s s e n s e : f o r the

second p a r t ( L i b r i IX e t X) with i t s t i t l e - p a g e

dated

1556 a s d e s c r i b e d h e r e , t h e r e i s s u b s t i t u t e d the 1560 P a r i s e d i t i o n o f the sane L i b r i IX e t X ( l i s t e d separately below). The P r i v i l e g i u m i s dated i d . s e p t .

1555·

This work i s n o t a mere r e o r d e r i n g of the books i n the Roigny and David e d i t i o n s above, but a r e w r i t t e n work. Although the p r e f a c e to p a r t 3 ( L i b r i IX e t X) i s the same and b e a r s the same date as t h a t o f the 1553 e d i t i o n of t h e s e books l i s t e d above, the t e x t o f the books themselves i s here changed, r a t h e r s l i g h t l y :

the

Greek phrases i n Ramus' commentary have been done away with and troublesome p a s s a g e s , altered.

See 27

Copies:

Ba

(Pbn)

(Pbn)

such as those on method,

(1557).

GOu Pbp

Gu

MoSU Pm

VIn [61]

(Rbc)

MUs

Ob Rbn

Pa Vbv

27 Animadversionum Aristotelicarum librl octo In totidem Aristotells Toplea: ad Carolum Lotharingum Cardinalem. Parislis: A. Wechelus, 1556. Copies:

8vo.

80 pp.

Pao

28 Quod alt unica doctrlnae lnstituendae methodus: locua β nono Animadversionum P. Rami ad Carolum Lotharingum Cardinalem.

Parislis: A. Wechelus, 1557·

8vo.

22 11. Notes:

See this title as separately listed below In

the Inventory (1557)· This excerpt corresponds exactly to pp. 37-76 of Llbrl IX et X In Ramus' Animadversionum Aristotelicarum llbrl vlglntl (1556) listed above, except for the fact that It prefixes to Ramus' commentary the few lines In Greek out of Aristotle's Posterior Analytics which the comnentary deals with, namely, Book I, chap.

11, sec. 10 (71a 33 to 72a 5«ITpoi Lf not an edition of Ramus' work itself. Copies:

BAu+

Pm

STnu

0» In 674. (1587-88).

305 De P. Rami Dialectica praecipuis capitibus disputationes . . . et . . . comparationes: » · · paedagogiae logicae pars secunda . . . . Beurhusio.

Auctore Frederico

Editio locupletior et emendatior.

Coloniae: Maternus Cholinus, 158Θ.

θνο.

[l6]+982+[25] pp. (many misnumbered). Copies:

Ob

306 P. Rami Dlalecticae libri duo, et his . . . comparati Philippi Melanchthonis Dlalecticae libri quatuor, cum . . . notis . . . auctore Priderico Beurhusio Francofurti: Ioannes Wechelus, 1588. [217]

8vo.

. . . . 232 pp.

Copies:

Cu

DAI

MBu

MUu

Pm

307 . P. Rami Dialecticae libri duo, cum . . . abservatlonibus ex Ramo ipso et Phllippo Melanchthone desumptls a M[agistro] Ioanne Rlgero Northusano.

Francofurti:

haeredes A. Wechell, CI. Marnius et I. Aubrius, 1508. 8vo. Copies:

L23+219+[12] pp. Dt

VIu

308 Tabulae generales In Dialectlcam P. Rami, qulbus ex altera facie opponuntur tabulae ex praescriptls Dlomini] Philippi Melanchthonis confectae. et Industrie M[agistri] Ruperti Erytroplli Lemgovlae: Conradus Grothenus, 1588.

Studio . . . .

fol.

A-lA

(leaves unnumbered). Notes: Copies:

A solid mat of dichotomized tables. [GOu]

HAk

TUu

309* The Lawiers Logike, exemplifying the Praecepts of Logike by the Practice of the Common Law·. [218]

By

Abraham F r a u n c e . 1+to.

London: William How, 1 5 8 8 .

[10]+l5l 11.

Table.

Note3: A f r e e a d a p t a t i o n r e t a i n i n g Ramus' g e n e r a l d e f i n i t i o n s and s t r u c t u r e and applying Ramist " l o g i c a l a n a l y s e s " to law c a s e s . P r a u n c e ' s Arcadian Rhetorike

See note

to

( l f ? 8 l ) under A. T a l a e l

R h e t o r l c a above. Copies:

Lbm

S i r R. L . Harmsworth

(S.T.C.)

310* The Lawiers Logike . . . .

By Abraham F r a u n c e .

London: William How f o r Thoraas Gubbin and T. Newman, 1 5 8 8 . Notes:

l^to.

[10]+l5l 11.

Table.

A r e i s s u e o f the f o r e g o i n g , with a new

title-page. Copies:

CSmH

Cu

Lbm

Lbm

Lbm

MoSu"1

Ob

311» The Lawiers Logike . . . .

By Abraham F r a u n c e .

London: W. How f o r T. Newman and T. Gubbin, Ij.to.

[10]+151 1 1 .

Table.

[219]

1588.

N o t e s : A r e i s s u e of t h e f o r e g o i n g , w i t h a new title-page. Cople3:

Chapin L i b r a r y , W i l l i a m s t o w n ,

(S.T.C.)

Bernard Q u a r i t c h , L t d . ,

Mass.

London

(S.T.C.)

312 I.'ichseiis Eonleutneri I n s t i t u t i o n i a libri

dialecticae

duo, e* M e l a n c h t h o n i s e t P. Rami

praeceptionibub d e s c r i p t i .

dialecticis

NorLnbergas:

15^5.

6vo. Copleg :

bc--p.

1344·

0 I n 653

(1562).

0»

I n 575 ( 1 5 0 8 ) .

313 D i a l e c t i c a e ] i b r i duo, p e r Rclandum Makilmenaeum .

. . a u c t o r i s j u s s u i n quibusdajr. l o c i s

eraendati.

F r a n c o f a r t i : he r e d e s A. w e c h e l i , C I . Marnius e t

ί 220]

I.

Aubrius, 1589· Copies;

8vo.

78 pp.

Psc+

311+ Dialecticae llbri dio; defensio eiuodem dialecticae . . . authore Friderico Beurhusio . . . . G. Bishop, 1509. Notes:

Övo.

Londini:

[li;]+286 pp.

German synonyms for Ramist Latin terms are

provided here and there. Copies:

CU

Ob

Psc

315 Petri Martini viri doctissimi et philosophiae professorie Rupellae In P. Rami . . . tarius . · . · 8vo. Copies:

Logicam commen-

Spirae: Bernardus Albinus, 1589·

[16]+171 pp. Ck

Dt

316 Dialecticae libri duo, cum conmentariis Guilielmi Rodingi . . . .

Prancofurti: haeredes A. Wecheli,

1589.

8vo.

Copies:

b e — p . 13^1 [221]

υ In 654. ( 1 5 8 9 ) . 0 In 676 ( 1 5 8 9 ) .

317 Logica, das i s t , Vernunfftkunst, nach der Hochberhümbten P. Rami D i a l e c t i c a

erstlich

L a t e i n i s c h unnd folgende a u f f Teutsch zugericht und v e r f e r t i g t k ü r t z l i c h aussgelegt und mit v i e l e n Exempeln aus der S c h r i f f t e r k l ä r e t beides durch Goswlnum W a s s e r l e i t e r , Mulhemium.

E r f f o r d : in V e r l e -

gung Ottonis von Risswick [colophon: gedruckt durch Esaiam Wechlern], 1590. Notes: Copies:

8vo.

[8J+219 1 1 .

See also 288. Rbc

318 D i a l e c t i c a e l i b r i duo; defensio eiusdem d i a l e c t i c a e . . . authore Prederico Beurhusio

. . . .

Francofurdi: A. Wecheli heredes, C l . Marnius e t Aubrius, 1590.

8vo.

[123+4.58 pp.

[222]

I.

Copies:

BEs

MAs

STnu

Vbv

319 Pauli Frisii Laubanensis Comparationum dialecticarum libri tres, quibus Philippi Melanohthonis et P. Rami praecepta dialectics . . . .

conferuntur.

Prancofurti:

A. Wecheli heredes, CI. Marnius et I. Aubrius, 1590. 8vo.

Copies:

Ill pp.

BAu

Osj

320» Logica ad usum rudiorum In epitomen redacta. Ioannem Thoraam Preigium. Gerlachlanis, 1590.

Per

[Noribergae?]: typis

8vo.

Blank 2 , G-K 0 , iA

(pp. unnumbered). Notes:

A catechetical adaptation of Ramus, with a

section, "De usu logicae," treating of sophisms, tacked on.

Copies:

Cu

321» Amandi Polanl . . . Logicae libri duo. 1590. [22

3]

Herbornae,

Copies:

ANr

322 Dialectics« lib(rl] duo, nunc In gratiam atudlosae iuventutis absque conmentariia In lucem edlti. Francofurdi: Ioannea Wechelua, itopensia Ioannia Alburgensla, 1591.

8vo.

[8j+7l|. pp.

(InGOu

copy Interleaved throughout with blanks). Copies:

GOu

VIn

322 P. Rami Dlalectloae libri duo, et hla . . . comparati Fhilippi Melanchthonis Dialecticae libri quatuor, cum . . . notis . . . auotore Frederico Beurhuslo Ed. 2*.

Francofurti: Ioannea Wechelua et Petrua

Fiacherus, 1591. Copiea:

....

BAu

GOu

βτο. Pbn

232 pp. STcw

Bk Tabulae plane novae, auecinctae ae conapicuae, in nobilem illam dlsaerendi artem, P. Rami Dialecticae libroa duos . . . cum exemplia, ut plurimian theologicia, atque acholiia tarn textum quam tabulaa has elucidantibua. . . ed(itae] a M[agiatro] Conrado Heandre Bergenai. [22U]

F r a n c o f u r t i : A. wechell haeredes, 1591· 251). pp. (many misnumbered).

Tables.

Notes: This i s an e d i t i o n in dichotomized t a b l e s . The s e c t i o n on method i s very f u l l and d e t a i l e d . Copies:

Cu

Dt

Ob

325

D i a l e c t i c a e l i b r i duo ex . . . i p s i u s d i s p u t a t i o n i bus . . . e x p l i c a t i a Guilielmo Rodingo. F r a n c o f u r t i : Wechelus, 1591·

0

v°·

Ed. 5 a · 139 PP·

Table. Copies:

[DAI]

326 D i a l e c t i c a e l i b r i duo, s c h o l i i s G u i l i e l m i TempoHi i l l u s t r a t i ; quibus a c c e s s i t eodem auctore

[i.e.

Tempello] De Porphyrianis p r a e d i c a b i l i b u s

disputatio;

item, E p i s t o l a e d · P. Rami D i a l e c t i c a contra Iohannia P i s c a t o r i s responsionem defensio [ab eodem Guilielmo Tempello s c r i p t a ] . . . .

F r a n c o f u r t i : Ioannes

Wechelus e t Petrus F i s c h e r u s , 1591· [6J+152+[2J+108

pp.

Copies:

MUs

GOu

Pbn [2251

Ed. 2 a .

8vo.

327 Dialectica. Notes;

Cantabrigiae, 1592.

l6mo.

See note with 111.

326

Ioannis B i l a t e n i l D i a l e c t i c a , in qua P. Rami e t F h i l i p p i Melanchthonis praeoepta l o g i c a conjunguntur e t s y l l o g i s m ! ex t h e o l o g i a , philosophia, ac i u r i a p r u dentia passim adduntur. Copies:

Hanoviae: 1592·

8vo.

be—p. 131^3

329 Rudolpbi S n e l l i i Veteraquinatis Connie n t a r i us d o c t i s simue in Dialecticam P. Rami foiroa d i a l o g i conscriptus . . . , textu Rameo recens per singula c a p i t a p r a e f i x o ; huic a c c e s s i t T r a c t a t i o de praxi l o g i c a . . . ; item» Commonefactlones e t regulae Rudolpbi Goclenii de ratione disputandi; a d i e c t a e s t . . .

Rud[olpbi]

S n e l l i i Etbica mathodo Ramea c o n s c r i p t a . Christophorus Corvinus, 1592.

8vo.

Herbornae: [8]+353+[l]+50

pp. (the Ethica with separate t i t l e - p a g e and pagination a f t e r p. [354])· [226]

Copies:

GOu

330 Animadversiones Ioan[nis] Piscatoris . . . ticam P. Rami . . .

Ed. 4

In Dialec-

. . . ultra superioram

. . . aucta; epistolae duae . . . altera Guilielmi Tempelll, altera Ioan[nis] Piscatoris. haeredes A. Wecheli, 1593·

Copies:

Francofurti:

8vo.

Tv

331» Amandi Polani . . . Logicae llbri duo, luxta naturalis methodl leges confoimata . . . ; accessit brevls acfconitio de usu logieae et de vera facllique imitatione Ed. 2 a . . . accuratior et auctior

autorum.

. . . .

Herbornae Nassovlorum: Christopherus Corvinus» 1593· 8vo.

L52]+371+[13] PP.

Notes:

The preface notes that the treatment here

follows Ramus, William Temple (for method), and others. Ramus' text is given here only in scraps.

The book

closes in twelve pages of serried dichotomies. Copies:

Pm

[227]

332 Rudimente Dialectices Rami b r e v i t e r c o l l e c t a et exemplis potisslmum s a c r i s i l l u s t r a t a per Hieronymum Treutierum. Copies:

Herbornae: 1593·

8vo.

be—p. 13^1

333 Dfcctorisj Andreae L i b a v i i C o l l a t i o d i a l e c t i c e s P h i l i p p i Melancbthonis et P. Rami. Copies:

[Fl]

Noribergae: 1593«

8vo.

be—p. 13lt4

334 Dlalecticae l i b r l duo» exemplia . . . i l l u s t r a t l . . * per Rolandum Makilmenaeum . . . .

Francofurdi:

heredes A. Wecheli, C I . Marnius et I . Aubrius, 1594· 8vo. Copies:

ll)-9+[2] pp. Vbv

335 Dlalecticae P. Rami et Uelanchthonis c o l l a t i o l n s t i t u t a ab Otbone Casmanno. 1594.

8vo.

Copies:

ALI [228]

Hannov[eriae?]:

Ioannle Bllstenil . . .

Dialectica, in qua P.

Rami et Philippl Melanchthonis praecepta loglca coniunguntur, et syllogism! ex theologia, philosophia, ac iurisprudentla passim adduntur; cum praefatione, in qua dialectica divinls testimoniie ex saora scriptura desumptis adversus logicae hostes commendatur. Hanoviae: G. Antonius« 1594· Notes:

8vo.

[l6]+390 pp.

As i s usual in these Philippo-Ramist works«

Ramism takes the upper hand: there are two books here« Lib. I , "De inventions," Lib. I I , "De dispositions." Copies:

GOu

Pbn

Zz

0 In 677 (1594)· 337 Fridericl Beurhusii Dialectica Rami et Melanchthonls β regions posita comparetio. Petrus Fischerus, 1595· Copies: bc--p. 13lj3

[229]

8vo.

Francofurtl:

m D i a l e c t l c a e emendatae l i b r l duo . . . ex . . . praecipue A r i s t o t e l i s , P. Rami, e t P h f i l i p p o ] Melanchthonis s e n t e n t i i s . . . ; adiectum e s t t r i p l e x controversiarum logicarum iudicium . . . Libavii.

F r a n c o f u r t i : Ioannis S a u r i u s ,

Petri K o p f f i i , 1595· Notes:

studio Andreae

8vo.

impensis

5M)- PP·

Ramus' D i a l e c t i c governs the b a s i c economy

of t h i s p r o f e s s e d amalgam. Copies:

Ob

Pm

Zz

m Dialogus l o g i c u s secundus; continens declarationem d i a l e c t i c a e P. Rami f a c i l e m e t expeditam, a d h i b i t i s una p r a e c e p t i s e t r e g u l i s D[omini] P h i l i p p i Melanchthonis . . . concinnatus .

. ab Andrea L i b a v i o .

F r a n c o f u r t i : Ioannes Saurius impenaie P e t r i K o p f f i i , 1595. Kote3:

8vo.

294 pp.

Ramus' t e x t i s h a l f buried i n t h i s d i a l o g u e ,

but i t i s s t i l l p r e s e n t , and by no means d e f u n c t . Copies:

BAu

DAI

Dt

[230]

Pm

3ΐμ> D I a l e c t i c a e l i b r i duo, e o h o l i i s Guilielmi Tempelli . . . illustratl;

quibua a c c e a s i t , eodem auctore

l i . e . , TempelloJ, De Porphyriania p r a e d i c a b i l i b u s d i s p u t a t i o ; Item, E p i s t o l a e de P. Rami D i a l e c t l c a contra Ioannis P i s o a t o r i s responsionem defenaio [ab eodem Guilieimo Tempello s c r i p t a ] . . .

*

Ed.

·

Prancofordiae: o f f i c i n a Paltheniana aumptlbue P e t r i F i s c h e r i , 1595. Copies;

BAu

8vo.

[6]+l52+[4]+108 pp.

Ku

341 In P. Rami D i a l e c t i c e s l i b r o s duos, Ioannis P i s c a toria . . . acholia.

Nunc primum in lucem e d i t a .

Hanoviae: G. Antonius, 1595· Note 3ϊ tary.

βνο.

?ί|Ω pp.

Ramus1 t e x t i n f u l l Interspersed with. comneQ* P i s c a t o r ' s preface i s dated Sigenae, 10 dec.

1594Copies:

ALI

MBA

VIu

3 k2 Rudolphi S n e l l i i

. . . Commentarius . . .

in D i a l e c -

ticam P. Rami . . . , textu Rameo . . . p r a e f i x o ; a c c e a s i t . . . Rud[olphi] S n e l l i i Ethica 1231]

. . . .

Herbornae: Chriatophorus Corvinue, 1595· [8]+288+[2]*50 pp.

8vo.

(Ethica with aeparate t i t l e -

page and pagination). Copies:

GOu

Yin

Μ Harmonlae loglcae Phllipporameae l l b r l duo, nunc prlmum . . .

in lueem e d i t l opera e t studio Heizonis

Buscherl, Hannoveranl patriae scholae Reetoriβ. Lemgoviae: Magnus Holsten, 1595·

8vo.

[16^348+

110] pp. Notes:

The two-book Ramlst arrangement of material

usual in these amalgams i s found here. given only in p a r t .

Ramus' text i s

Occasional German synonyms f o r

Latin terms are provided. Copies;

Cu

MBu

Ob

31Λ Dialeotlcae l i b [ r i ] duo, nunc prlmum hac manual1 foraa e d l t i . 12mo. Kotes:

Spirae: Berahardus Alblnua, 1595·

107 pp. Ίΐιβ f i r s t of the vest-pocket schoolboy edi-

tions, l a t e r so often published at Frankfurt, Cambridge, e t c . [232]

Copies:

MUs

MUu

345 Ad P. Rami Dialectlcae praxin generalis introductio . . . quae paedagogiae logicae pars t e r t i a

. . . .

Iam postrema recognita e t accuratius i n s t r u c t s . Auctore Frederico Beurhusio . . . . Gosvinus Cholinus, 1596. Notes:

8yo.

Ramus' text i s here

Coloniae: [l6]+81t4+[2J pp.

snowed over with d r i f t s

of commentary. Copies:

BEs

Cu

Ku

Μ P. Rami Dialectica ad paucissima praecepta redacta. Auctore H[agistro] Carolo

Bumanno, rectore acholae

Catharinianae Brunovicensium.

Francofurti: haeredes

A. Wecheli, CI. Marnius e t I . Aubrius, 1596.

8vo.

131 pp. Copies:

Ccl

3kl Pauli F r i s i i Comparationum dialecticarum l i b r i t r e a , quibua Philippi Melanchthonis e t P. Rami praecepta

[233]

dialectica . . . conferuntur. et aucti.

Francofurti: heredes A. Wecheli, CI.

Marnius et I. Aubrlus, 1596.

Copies:

Ab auctore recognlti

Dt

8vo.

pp.

Pm

3^8 Dlalectlcae llbri duo ex . . . Ipslus dlsputationibus et . · . A . Talael commentarils denuo . . . explicati a Gullielmo Rodingo . . . .

Ed. 5®.

Francofurti:

heredes A. Wecheli, Cl. Marnius et I. Aubrlus, 1596. 8vo. 139+Ilj·] PP· Copies:

[DAI ]

Pm

Μ Rudolphl Snellll In Dlalectlcam P. Rami praelectiones, cum lectlsslmls . . . observatlonlbus et castigatlonlbue collatae; ad calcem adlecta est succlncta et accurate Dlalectlcae summl vlrl Phllippi Melanchthonls et allorum ad P. Rami logicam collatio. Francofurti: Ioannis Saurlus, impensis haeredum Petri Fischeri, 1596. Notes: Copies:

8vo.

7θ8+[1] pp.

Contains Ramus' text only in snatches. Ku

Vbv [2314-]

350 In P. Rami D i a l e c t i c e s l i b r o s duos Ioannis P l s c a toris . . . scholia.

Nunc primum in lucem e d i t a .

Hanoviae: G. Antonius, 1596. Notea:

θνο.

2l±0 pp.

Ramus' f u l l t e x t , i n t e r s p e r s e d with

commentary. Copies:

BAu

LIbn

Pmp

P e t r i Martini . . . In P. Rami . . . Logicam commentarius . . . .

3 a ed. ab authore r e c o g n i t a .

S p i r a e : Bernardus Albinus, 1596. Cople s :

Ob

8vo.

206 pp.

0j

0 In 655 ( 1 5 9 6 ) . 0 In 656 ( [ 1 5 9 6 ? ] )

352« Hypomnemata l o g i c a , ex summia philosophis g r a e c i s e t l a t i n i s . . . deducta . . . [235]

a M [ a g i s t r o ] Carolo

Bumanno; qulbus accessit Dlalecticae artis repetltio . . . .

Francofurti: A. Wechell herede a, CI· Marnius

et I. Aubrius, 1597·

8vo.

pp.

No tea: Although it begins In grand eclectic style, this work celebrates Ramus' achievement in the dedicatory material» adopts the Ramist two-book logic of lnventlo and judicium, soon drifts deeper and deeper into Ramism, and comes eventually to reproduce chunks of Ramus' text verbatim. Copies:

Pbn

m

Harmonlae loglcae Phillppo Rameae libri duo . . . opera et studio M[aglstri] Heizonis Buscheri. Lemgovlae: Magnus Holsten, 1597.

8vo.

[12]+380+[8] pp. Copies:

GOu

Ob

33k

Rameae dlalecticae libri duo, propositi noviter et expositl a Iohanne Bisterfeldio.

Sigenae Nasso-

viorum: Christopherus Corvlnus, 1597. 127+11] pp. [236]

8vo.

Notes:

B i s t e r f e l d 1 a p r e f a c e i s dated Sigenae

Nassoviorum, 4 a p r . 1 5 9 7 · Copies:

Dt

3£i Rudolphi S n e l l i i Commentarius . . . P. Rami . . . .

; a c c e d i t eiusdem Rudolphi

Ethica . . . .

Sigenae Nassoviorum:

Corvinus, 1 5 9 7 . Copies:

BAu

in Dialecticam

övo.

Snellii

Christopherus

[83+288+50 p p .

Ob

Amandi P o l a n i Logicae l i b r i methodi l e g e s c o n f o r r a a t i . Conradus W a l d k i r c h i u s , 1598.

duo i u x t a n a t u r a l i s Ed. 3&. 8vo.

Basileae: [llf]+23lj.+ [ 2 ]

pp. Copies:

Occh

357 D i a l e c t i c a e l i b r i dio, in gratiam studiosae

inven-

t u t i s absque commentariis i n lucem e d i t i . Hanoviae: G. A n t o n i u s , 1598.

[237]

12mo.

99 p p .

Notes:

The f i r s t of the many vest-pocket schoolboy-

editions to be published at Hanau, near Frankfurtam-Main.

The commentaries, once added to c l a r i f y

Ramus' t e x t , are here taken away f o r the same reason. Copies:

Pbn

3£8 MfagistriJ Heizonis Buscheri Harmonlae l o g i c a e Philipporameae l i b r l duo.

Lemgoviae: 1598·

8vo. Copies:

bc--p. 1343

m M l a g i s t r i ] Heizonis Buscheri Harrooniae l o g i c a e Philipporameae l i b r i duo. Palthenius, 1 5 9 9 · Copies:

F r a n c o f u r t i : Zacharias

8vo.

be—p. 13^3

360 Otthonis Casmanni P. Rami Dialecticae e t Melanchthonianae c o l l a t i o , i n s t i t u t e ac proposita l e c t i o n ibus p r i v a t i s . Notes:

Hanoviae: 1 5 9 9 ·

8vo.

See the 1604. e d i t i o n by Casmann below.

[238]

Copies:

be—p. 13lj.3

361 Rudimenta d i a l e c t i c a e P. Rami b r e v i t e r c o l l e c t s e t exemplis s e l e c t i s , s a c r i s potissimum, l l l u s t r a t a per Hieronymura Treutlerum Silesium in asum Scholae Herbornensis.

Ed. 2 a c o r r e c t i o r .

Christopherus Corvinus, 1599· Notes:

8vo.

Herbornae: lj.5 pp.

T r e u t l e r ' s preface i s dated 10 c a l . mail

1589Copies:

BAu

GOu

362 D i a l e c t i c e s l i b r i duo; h i s adiuncta e s t eiusdem e p i s t o l a ad Georgium Rheticum de conformanda l o g i c i s legibus a s t r o l o g i a .

[Lugduni Batavorum:] o f f i c i n a

Plantiniana, apud Christophorum Raphelengium, 1599. 8vo.

6ij. pp.

Notes:

Ramus' l e t t e r to Rheticus, pp. 60-61^., i s

dated from the College de P r e s l e s , 8 c a l . sept. 1563. Copies:

Mbn

[239]

363 Dialecticae llbri duo, nunc iterum hac manuali forma Spirae: Bernardus Alblnus, 1599·

editi. 91+15J

12mo.

PP·

Copies:

Cu

MUu

36k Libri duo harmonlae loglcae Philipporameae . . . « Ed.

. . . aucta et emendata, opera et studio

M[agistri] Helzonis Buacheri . . . . Andreas Hoffmannus, 1S99· Copies:

8vo.

[Wlttebergae:] [ θ ] + 3 5 7 + [ 7 ] ΡΡ·

Pac

365 De dlalectlca Aristotellca Industrie Pthlllppl] Melanchthonis et P. Rami philosophorura selecta et declarata Andreae Llbavll . . . dialogue secundue. Prancofurtl: Ioannls Saurius lmpensls Petri Kopffll, l600. Hotes:

8vo.

29i+. pp.

The companion Dlalogus primus does not

reproduce Ramus' text and hence is not listed here. Copies:

Pbn

Pm

Psc

[214-0]

366 D i a l e c t l c a e l i b r i duo, per Rolandum Makilmenaeum . . . a u c t o r i s iussu in quibusdam l o c i s emendati. F r a n o o f u r t i : haeredes A. Wecheli, C I . Marniu3 e t Aubrius, ΐ6υθ. Copies:

8vo.

I.

77+13] pp.

Cu

367 Hera[anni] Nicephori Άγο b 3»

but

[1588?]

8vo.

with no leaves

missing between these signatures) +pp. numbered 33-lll· 0 ·

(The text of the gramnar begins on p. 33»

which bears the t i t l e here supplied In brackets for t h i s book. Kotes:

P. lij.0 concludes with a F i n i s . )

B i l s t e i n 1 s preface i s dated 11 c a l . iun.

1588. Copies:

(Zz)

[329]

Rudimenta grammaticae, ex P . Rami . . . postrema grammatica c o l l e c t a

[a N i c o i a o B e r g e r o n o ] .

postrema . . . .

F r a n c o f u r d i : h a e r e d e s A . Wecheli,

159Ο.

8vo.

Copies:

Cu

Ed.

lj.8 pp. Pm

560 Rudimenta granmaticae l a t i n a e , .

. . einendata.

ex postrema

F r a n c o f u r t i : h a e r e d e s A. W e c h e l i ,

C I . Marnius e t I . A u b r i u s , 1 5 9 5 · Notes:

editione

8vo.

I4.6 p p .

The Rbn copy i s marked a s from the main

l i b r a r y of the ( f o r m e r ) Roman C o l l e g e of the S o c i e t y of

Jesus.

Copies:

Ob

Pm

Rbn

561 Rudimenta grammaticae ex eiusdem Grammatica c o l l e c t a : L i b r i duo. 1607.

8vo.

Copies:

LGj

Ed. p o s t r e m a .

[33Ο]

breviter

Hanoviae:

LECTURES ON GRAMMAR, INCLUDING CORRECT PRONUNCIATION IN WO BOOKS These are Ramus' l e c t u r e s on the content of h i s own L a t i n Grammar, i n twenty books i n t h e i r complete form.

562 P. Rami Scholae grammaticae. '»Vechelus, 1559 ·

8vo.

Parislis:

A.

3i|-2+[2] pp.

Ramus' preface to Charles, Cardinal

Notes:

of

L o r r a i n e , i s dated c a l . aug. 1559> the Privilegium, 3 i d . iun. 1557 (see remarks above with f i r s t

edi-

t i o n of Liber de Caesaris m i l i t i a ) . Copies: ?tts

Ba

MUs

BRr Pa

BSv Pbn

CtY

Cu

LMv

LRv

Ps

563 P. Rami L i b r i duo de v e r i s sonis l i t t e r a r u m e t syllabarum, e Schölls grammaticia p r i m i , ab authore recogniti et locupletati. 15614.. Notes:

8vo.

P a r i s i i s : A. IVechelus,

[ l ] + 5 3 + [ l ] 11.

The f i r s t two of the twenty books o n l y .

These are the books i n which Ramus sustains the newer pronunciation of £u (as kw) of h ( a s p i r a t e d ) [331]

a g a i n s t the older French pronunciation of Latin (qu as k, h as ch or k ) , taking a p o s i t i o n which was not new, but which earned him some f u r t h e r a t t e n t i o n (see Waddington, pp. 85 f f . ) · Copies:

Ba

Ba

Bu

NNC

0 In 695 (1569). 0 In 696 (1578). 0 In 697 (1581). 0 In 698 (1595).

[332]

Ob

Pm

Psc

Rbn

ALGEBRA This short, two-book (in the first edition two-part) algebra, was thought by Niceron and Waddington and all who have followed them into print to have been published only posthumously. However, as the note with the first edition here shows, it appeared anonymously twelve years before Ra.nu s' de a th. Ir. the Rani at methodization of the sciences, algebra is a source of permanent embarrassment.

The

first edition of this work 1ε very loosely organized but suggests that algebra is a part cf arithmetic. But what sort of a part?

The answer is provided

after Ramus' death by Lazarus Schcner in his 1586 edition of Ramus' arithmetic ar.d algebra.

Here

Schoner's commentary cn the first chapter of the Algebra explains that algebra is what the Greeks call the "analytic" part cf arithmetic, as against arithmetic proper, which they styled "synthetic"-this touting ci analytic and synthetic is, of course, Ramist» not Greek.

Schöner goes on to say that, like

arithmetic (one might say, like everything for a Ramist), algebra has two parts: simple (single numbers) ani comparative algebra (combined numbers).

Schöner's "analytic" and "synthetic" is a real tour de force, but the preoccupation with relating the sciences with one another, to which he bears witness, is undoubtedly the harbinger of Descartes' analytical geometry.

Raraists, however,

on principle, were committed to a program of severing the sciences one from another in their theoretical treatment, not of uniting them, and they tended to eliminate matter which did not meet their specifications.

Thus, before Schöner, the redoubtable

Iohann Thomas Freige had excluded algebra from his 1576 edition of Ramus' arts, the Professio regia. As the opening words of the 1560 edition cited below show, the uneasy position of algebra in the Ramist canon is connected with the uneasy position of squared and cubed numbers (numeri figurati)--see the introductory note to the Arithmetic in this Inventory above.

Involved in the Ramist mind with

geometrical figures (figurae), these subjects seemed thereby to be connected with geometry as well as with arithmetic, and the whole principle of total distinction, on which Ramism was built, was thereby impugned.

Schöner·s l6l5 edition listed here below

associates algebra with squared and cubed numbers as special problems for Ramists even more closely than

[ 33J+]

h i 3 o t h e r e d i t i o n s o f the A l g e b r a .

Algebra.

P a r i s i i s : A. Wechelus, 1 5 6 0 .

4to.

18 11. Notes:

This anonymous work i s c e r t a i n l y Ramus',

as comparison with the 1592 or o t h e r e d i t i o n s below shows.

In the Occh copy, "P. Rami" i s l e t t e r e d

care-

f u l l y on the t i t l e - p a g e i n ink so as to look l i k e printing.

The Ku c a t a l o g u e a s c r i b e s the work to

Ramus. The t e x t b e g i n s , "Algebra e s t p a r s A r i t h m e t i c a e , quae e f i g u r a t i s continue

proportionalibus

numerationem quandam propriam i n s t i t u i t . "

The two

p a r t s o f a l g e b r a are " s i m p l e x figuratorum numeratio" and "comparata figuratorum n u m e r a t i o . "

There

is

nothing about the r e l a t i o n o f a n a l y s i s and s y n t h e s i s to a l g e b r a or to

arithmetic.

The work i s divided not i n t o l i b r i as such, but i n t o two p a r t e s .

There are no c h a p t e r s ,

but

some c e n t e r e d heads divide the f i r s t p a r t i n t o addition,

subtraction, multiplication, e t c . ,

and the

second p a r t i n t o two e q u a t i o n s and three

canons.

The f a c t t h a t t h i s f i r s t ,

tentative

edition

i s anonymous suggests how Ramus' d e s i r e f o r fa:ne as 13351

a mathematician was tempered by foreboding concerning his initial qualifications.

Copies:

Ku

NNC

Occh

MBw

Müs?

0

In 686 (1586).

0

In 687 (1592).

0

in 681j. (1599).

0 In 688 (l60ij.). 0 In 689 (I6II).

565 P. Rami Algebrae libri duo; quibus praepositus est libellus Lazari Schoneri De numeris figuratis. Pariaiis: Ioannes de Bouc, i6l5· 13 pp.

[336]

8vo in i^'s.

Notes:

This is the only edition printed separately

from the Geometry which I find with Ramus' name on the title-page.

Copies:

Psg

0

In 690 (I617).

0 In 685 (1627).

GREEK GRAMMAR This is a concise, practical, very elementary Greek grammar.

The early editions treat

only the Ramiats1 first part of grammar, etymology, the second part being separately printed under the title Greek Syntax (Liber de syntaxl Graeca).

The

Privilegium printed with the 1562 edition of this latter work refers to it only as Liber de syntaxl C-raeca, and hence, to minimize confusion, so long as it continues to appear under this separate title, it is listed in this Inventory as a separate work. In 1567 and thereafter, the syntax is thrown in under the title Grainmatica Graeca. 1337]

The q u a l i f i c a t i o n added to the t i t l e " i n so f a r as i t d i f f e r s from L a t i n " (quatenus a Latlna d i f f e r t ) r e f l e c t s not only the general p r a c t i c e

in

teaching C-reek to boys who already knew some L a t i n , but a l s o the Ramist p r i n c i p l e t h a t no a r t should overlap any o t h e r .

Soon, however, t h i s p r i n c i p l e

y i e l d s ground a l i t t l e ,

and the t i t l e i s emended to

" c h i e f l y in so f a r as i t d i f f e r s from L a t i n "

(1577

ed.; 1562 ed. of L i b e r de s y n t a x i G r a e c a ) . A s t i l l useful f e a t u r e o f t h i s grammar i s the g l o s s a r y of the mystifying l i g a t u r e s used i n Renaissance Greek t e x t s .

566 P. Rami Crammatica Graeca, quantenus a Latina differt.

P a r i s i i s : A. Wechelus, 1 5 6 0 .

θνο.

168 pp. Kotes: only.

T r e a t s the f i r s t h a l f of grammar, etymology, Ramus' preface to Charles,

L o r r a i n e , i s dated 7 i d . i u l . Copies:

BRr

MUs

(Pmp)

£330]

1560.

Cardinal of

567 Gramnatica Graeca, quatenus a Latina differt. Farisiis: A. Wechelus, 1562. Kotes:

8vo.

l68 pp.

The Privilegium is dated 3 id. iun. 1557

(see remarks above with first ed. of Liber de Caesarls militia). Copies: Pbn

IU

Pi

Lbm Pm

Ps

Treats etymology only. LMv Psc

LVb

OTIC

Ob

Pbn

Vbv

568 C-rammatica Graeca, quatenus a Latina differt. Parisiis: A. Wechelus, 1567. Notes:

8vo.

2l|0 pp.

Adda the Ramist second half of grammar,

syntax, pp. l6l-2ij.O. Copies: Psc

Csc

GOu

Hu

MUu

NcD

Pbp

Pmp

STnu

569 Grammatica Graeca, quatenus a Latina differt. 1572. Notes:

Waddington notes that in his letter to

Freige of August l6, 1572, Ramus mentions a revision his Grammatica Graeca newly published. 1577 ed. belov;.

[339]

Cf. the

Copies:

w—citing Ramus

0 In 651 ( 1 5 7 6 ) . 570 Grammatica C-raeca, praecipue quatenus a Latina d i f f e r t , in l i b r o s quatuor d i g e s t a , ante obitum auctoris de novo compilata, aucta, e t e l u c i d a t a . F r a n c o f u r t i : A. Wechelus, 1577· Ij22+[1] pp. (p. Copies;

Dm

Ip22

Lbm

8vo.

misnumbered 7 2 2 ) . MUs

Occ

Ps

Rbn

VIn

571 Grammatica Graeca, praecipue quatenus a Latina d i f f e r t . . . ante obitum a u c t o r i s de novo comp i l a t a . . . nunc . . . emendata notisque . . . illustrate. 8vo.

If.32 pp.

Copies: 11WA

F r a n c o f u r t i : A. Wechelus, 1581.

Ps

BSv

Ck

STnu

Csj

Css

Cii

Eu

GOu

VIu

572 Grammatica Graeca, praecipue quatenus a Latina differt . . .

ante obitum a u c t o r i s de novo compilata [340]

. . . nunc . . . emendate notisque . . . illustrate.

Francofurti: heredes A. «Vecheli, li>ü6.

8vo.

lj-32 pp.

Copies; Rbn

BEs

Cm

Enc

LRv

MUs

Ob

Psc

STnu

573»

[Grammaticae Graecae typus.] Opsimathes. ] leal. mart.

[Ed. by Iohannes

[Prague:] Ioannes Tornaeaius, l602, [6] 11. (22.ipc3^.8 cm.), without

numbers or signatures and a huge folding table (lj.6.2x65.8 cm.). Notes:

There is no mention of Ramus' name in this

work, but the folding table displays all of Greek grammar in the familiar Ramist divisions, arranged in dichotomized chart form.

There is no title-

page, at least in the VIn copy, and the entry here is from the VIn catalogue and from the folding table, which bears this heading: "Amplissimis viris . . . Dn. Georgio Punkio ab Olivero, s. R. C. M., consiliario et secretario regiae camerae Bohemicae fidelissimo; Dn. Iohanni Cocino a Cocineto, Pragae minoris syndico dignissimo; et Dn. Iohanni Kechelio ab Hollenstein, Dominus ac Patronis suis benignissimus, hunc Grammaticae Graecae typum, debitae observantiae TUuijoiOV grato animo offert [3la]

dedicatque Iohannos Opsimathes Moravus."

The

table concludes: "Typum hunc suis typus excudebat Ioannes Tornaesius typographus regius anno CIO. CII.

Kal. Mart."

In the light of the Ramist training which the famous Moravian educator John Amos Comensky (13'92-l671) received at the hands of Johann Heinrich Alsted in Herborn, this indication of earlier Ramist influence in and around Moravia is particularly interesting.

Comensky may have gone to Herborn

in quest of Ramism. Copies:

VIn

57k Grammatica Graeca, praecipue quatenus a Latina differt · . . ante obitum auctoris de novo compilata . . . nunc . . . emendata, notisque . . . illustrata.

Hanoviae: typis Wechelianis apud

CI. Marnium et haeredes I. A u b r ü , I605. k32 pp. Copies:

MA3

MH

NjP

Ob

I3U2]

SAu

8vo.

575 Grammatica Graeca . . . emendata n o t i s q u e illustrate. Copies:

Parisiis: l6o5·

8vo.

n — V o l . X I I I , p . 29fc.

GREEK SYNTAX See the note with the Greek Grammar, immediately p r e c e d i n g .

576 P. Rami L i b e r de s y n t a x ! Graeca quatenus a Latina d i f f e r t .

Parisiis:

A. Wechelus,

i^to.

28 pp.

Notes:

There i s no p r e f a t o r y m a t e r i a l .

Copies:

BRr

HUs

1560.

VIn

577 L i b e r de s y n t a x i Graeca, praecipue quatenus a Latina d i f f e r t . 8vo.

Parisiis:

[|_8 pp.

L 3i+33

A. .'Vechelus,

1562.

Notes:

The Privilegium I s dated the same as In

the corresponding Grammatlca Graeca, q. v . Copies: Pm

Psc

Lbm

LMv

LVb

NNC

Ob

Pbn

Pi

Vbv

RUDIMENTS OF GREEK GRAMMAR This I s Ramus' summary treatment of the f i r s t h a l f of h i s Greek grammar, to which a summary of the second h a l f i s added a f t e r h i s death.

Unlike

the Rudiments of L a t i n Grammar, t h i s i s not in c a t e c h e t i c a l or dialogue form, b u t , l i k e the Rudiments of L a t i n Grammar, i t i s redone a f t e r Ramus' death.

Based on the r e v i s i o n of Ramus'

Greek Grammar, the posthumous redaction could as well be considered a variant of t h i s l a t t e r work, although i t i s l i s t e d f o r convenience h e r e .

578-» Rudimente grammaticae graecae. Wechelus, 1560. Notes:

8vo.

P a r i s i i s : A.

26 1 1 .

The anonymity of t h i s work corresponds to

that of the companion e d i t i o n of the Grammatlca Graeca, and to that of the Rudlmenta granriatlcae £3104-3

Latinae,

There is no division into books, centered

headings marking the various sections, and no treatment of syntax. Copies:

Pbn

Pi

Vbv

579 Rudimente grammaticae graecae. Wechelus, 1565· Notes:

8vo.

Parisiis: A.

27 11.

With Ramus' name on title-page, but other-

wise the same as the 1560 edition.

Copies:

Pbn

£80 Rudimenta Graeca- a P. Rami Grammaticis praecipue collecta a Bernardo Salignaoo Burdegalensi. Francofurti: Λ. Wechelus, 1580.

8vo.

[6]+l85+

[1J PP. Notes:

Liber I, 30 capita (on etymology); Liber II,

14 capita (on syntax). Copies:

Lbm

L3U51

56ι_ RudLmenta Graeca a P. Rami Grammaticia praecipae c o l l e c t a a Bernardo S a l i g n a c o Henricus Binneman,

. . . .

8vo.

Londinii: [6 J +70+[13 PP·

Tables. Notes:

Despite the r e d u c t i o n in the number o f

pages, q u i t e the same work as the 1580 F r a n k f u r t e d i t i o n , only in much s m a l l e r Copies:

Lbm

MHi

MoSU

type. NN01

FRENCH GRAMMAR This French grammar f e a t u r e s i n i t s and anonymous, e d i t i o n spelling.

first,

Ramus' much touted reformed

Apart from the orthography, the o t h e r

e d i t i o n s do not d i f f e r g r e a t l y from the

first.

Ramus' i n n o v a t i o n s and t h e i r value have been exaggerated by p a r t i s a n s c h o l a r s h i p of the p a s t century which i s s t i l l c o n t r o l l i n g

attitudes

toward Ramus--as i n Howard G. Barnard, The French T r a d i t i o n In Education (Cambridge, U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , 1 9 2 2 ) , pp. 3/4.-J7·

As a g a i n s t B a r n a r d ' s p o s i t i o n ,

Brunot p o i n t s out t h a t Ramus' reformed orthography [31*6]

f o l l o w s t h a t of Louis M e i g r e t , who began h i s long campaign f o r reformed s p e l l i n g i n h i s

Tralt^

touchant l e commun usage de l ' e s c r l t u r e

franpolse

( P a r i s , 1 5 4 2 ) - - F e r d i n a n d Brunot, H i s t o i r e de l a langue f r a n ^ a i s e , 111-19, 150-55.

II

( P a r i s : Armand C o l i n ,

1922),

To t h i s i t might be added t h a t

C h r e s t i e n Wechel, the p r e d e c e s s o r o f Andre' Wechel, published many, i f not a l l ,

of M e i g r e t ' s reformed

o r t h o g r a p h i c a l works, and t h a t i t i s c l e a r

that

Ramus' Gramere a t l e a s t a v a i l s i t s e l f of type c u t f o r M e i g r e t , i f i t does n o t owe i t s whole

inspira-

t i o n p r a c t i c a l l y to the e x i s t e n c e o f t h i s

type.

This r a i s e s once a g a i n the i n t r i g u i n g q u e s t i o n as to J u s t how much o f Ramus' a c t i v i t y i n a l l

depart-

ments was the r e s u l t of encouragement from the Wechel publishing f i r m .

The i n f l u e n c e o f p r i n t i n g on

Renaissance humanism and philosophy was p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y very deep and o f t e n s u r p r i s i n g l y

direct—Erasmus·

g r e a t tombstone a t Basle was e r e c t e d by h i s g r a t e f u l printers. Ramus' reform o f orthography, t o g e t h e r with M e i g r e t ' s , was doomed when Ronsard, a t f i r s t i n f a v o r of i t ,

threw i t o v e r - . - ( B r u n o t , l o c . c l t . ) ,

and Ramus

h i m s e l f seems never to have used i t o u t s i d e the Gramere.

As Brunot likewise points out, Ramus' French grammar i s undistinguished, one among many, but Ramus seams to have been the f i r s t to divide grammar into etymology and syntax (see notes with h i s Latin Grammar above). For Nancel's possible part i n t h i s work, see the remarks above with the Latin Grammar.

582« Gramer^.

P a r i s : A. Wechel, 1$62.

8vo.

126+[1J pp. Copies: Ps

RMv

Lbm

Lbm

MH

NjP

Pbn

Pm

Pmp

STnu

583 Grammaire de Pierre de l a Ramie, l e c t e u r du roy en l ' U n i v e r s i t i de P a r i s . Copies:

P a r i s : 1567.

8vo.

n—Vol. X I I I , p. 298.

584 Grammaire de P. de l a Ramee . . . a l a royne mere du roy.

P a r i s : A. Wichel, 1572.

[18]+211 pp.

[3I+8]

8vo.

Notes:

This edition begins with ordinary ortho-

graphy, but chaps, v i i i f f . are in doable columns, one in ordinary and the other in phonetic spelling. Copies: MH

MUs

RMv

Tv

BSv Ob

Ctc Pa

Gu Pbn

Ku Pbn

Lbm

Lbm

Pm

Pmp

Lbm

MB

Psg

0

In 651 (1576). 585 Grammaire de Pierre de la Ram^e . . . revue e t enrichie en plusieurs endroits.

Val, 1587· Copies:

BSv

8vo. LAb

Paris: Denys du

223 pp. Lbm

Pbn

Pi

Pm

Psc

Psg

586 Grammatica Latino-Francica, a Petro Ramo Francice scripta, Latina vero facta annotationibusque i l l u s trate per Pantaleontem Theveninum

. . . .

Francofurti ad Moenum: I[oannes] Wechel, 1583·

8vo. Copies:

[l6]+137+[43 PP. MUs

Pbn

C3U-93

507 Graramatica Latino-Francica, a Petro Ramo Francioe scripta, Latina vere facta annotationibusque illustrate per Pantaleontem Theveninum a

Ed. 2 . 8vo. Cople s:

. . . .

Francofurti: Ioannes I'/echel, 1590· [l6]+137 + [l56+[10]+597 pp. Contents:

Tables.

Scholarum grammaticarum H b r i X X . —

Scholae rhetoricae [the eight-book Brutlnae quae3tlones plus the twelve-book Rhetoricae dlstinctlones).--Scholae dialectlcae [i.e., Aristotelicae animadversiones]. Notes:

The defective copies are missing either

the Scholae dialectlcae or both that and the Scholae rhetoricae. Copies: (Ob)

Au

MA3

(Pra)

(Pm)

(MBu) (Psc)

MUs

Müs

(Rbn)

NNC STna

Vbv

VIu

698 Scholae in tres primas liberales arte3 Recens e?iendatae per Ioannem Piscatorera

. . . . ....

Francofurti: A. Wecheli heredes, CI. Marnius & I. Aubrius, 1595 [thus the general title-page; separate title-pages for the Schol. rhet. and the Schol. dial. 8.2?© däted respectively l59J|j. Note s:

8vo.

&nd.

258+[20]+l66+[10]+60i|.+ [17] pp.

The defective copies are missing one or

another of the three artes. [WW

Copies: (Lbm) Occh

(BAu)

BEs

Caf

(Cm)

(Lbm)

(MBu)

(MoSU)

(Occh)

(Opb)

Pbn

(Cm) (MUs)

Pinp

Ku Ob

(Ob)

(VIn)

LECTURES ON RHETORIC Despite the subtitle, the eight-book Brutus' Problems are only part of this compound work, the last twelve books being the Evaluation of Qulntillan's Rhetoric.

699 P. Rami Scholarum rhetoricarum seu Quaestionum Brutinarum in Oratorem Ciceronis libri vlglnti: ad Henricum Franciae Regem. Ioannem Piscatorem . . . . Wechelus, 1581. Copies:

MH

Pbn

8vo. Pm

Recens emendati per Francofurti: A.

l66+[9] pp. Stnu

Stnu

700 Scholarum rhetoricarum seu Quaestionum Brutinarum in Oratorem Ciceronis libri vlglnti. emendati per Ioannem Piscatorem

[435]

. . . .

Recens

Francofurti: A. Wecheli haeredes, CI. Marnius et I. Aubrlus, 1593· Copies:

Ce

Cm

8vo.

Dm

Lbm

166+[10] pp. Occh

TRAINING IN DIALECTIC AND REMARKS ON ARISTOTLE See remarks on these separate works.

701 Petri Rami Dialecticae inatitutiones . . . item Aristotelicae animadversiones a prima editione nuspiam hac methodo visae . . . pristino nitori restltutae . . . opera Ioanntnis] Thomae Freigii. Baslleae: S. Henricpetri, 1575» mense martio. 8vo. Copies:

[l6]+238+[l] pp. BAu

GOu

LIbn

Vbv

EU363

MÜ3

Pbn

STnu

702 Dialecticae institution s, pp. 720-1j.8, et Ariscotelieae animadversionea, pp. 749-64»

in:

Antonii

Goveani Opera iuridica, philologlca, philosophica . . . edidit Iacobus van Vaassen. Henricus Beman, 1 7 6 6 . Copies;

CtY

I£m

fol. MoSP

NJP

Roterodami:

LXIX+[13+Θ33 PP· NNC

Pbn

LECTURES ON MATHEMATICS See the remarks with Lectures on tha Liberal Arts.

Although the Lectures or

Scholae are purportedly to refute adversaries, in elementary mathematics Ramus has a hard time manufacturing causes for dispute—often, but not always—and thus finds himself descending for long stretches to positive explanation.

703 P. Rami Scholarum mathematicarum libri unus et triginta.

Basileae: E. Episcopius et Nicolai

fratris haeredes, 1569.

ί|Λ°·

pp. [1*371

[l6]+3l4+[6]

Contents:

Praefatio in tres primos libros [a

Latin adaptation of the earlier Ρreface sur le proerne des mathematiques].--Lib. I-III [the Prooemium mathematician].

Lib. IV-V [Ramus' com-

mentary on his own two-book Arithmetlca ].

Lib.

VI-XXXI [Ramus' commentary on the fourteen books of fiuclid's Elementa> which Ramus elsewhere translate s ]. Notes:

The commentaries on the Arithmetlca and

Euclid were never published separately. Copies:

Au

Cu

DLC

MB

(MH)

On

Pbn

BAu Dt

Ce

Eu

MSM Rbn

Ce

GEpu

MUs SAu

Caj GOu

Müs STnu

Ct LEu

MUu

CtY

Cu

LIbn

Lu

NNC

STnu

VIn

Ob

Occ

Zz

70Lf. Scholarum mathematicarum libri onus et triglnta. 3asileae: 1578. Notes:

ij.to.

Very probably, Waddington simply deduced

this edition into hypothetical existence from the 157Q Scholae In liberales arte3.

Because its

existence is so doubtful, its contents are not listed

above

among the Individual v/orks. [U3Ö]

Copies:

w

705 Scholarum mathematicarum l i b r i unus e t

triginta,

a Lazaro Schonero r e c o g n i t i e t emendati. F r a n c o f u r t i : A. Wecheli h a e r e d e s , C I . Marnius e t I . Aubrius, 1 5 9 9 · Copies: Lu

MBu

Au

ij-to.

Bu

MUu

Cu Ob

[l6]+31J++[4] PP·

Dm 0m

GEpu Oq

GOu

Pbn

Lbm

Rbn

SAu

VIu

706 Scholarum mathematicarum l i b r i unus e t

triginta,

dudum quidem a Lazaro Schonero r e c o g n i t i e t

aucti,

nunc vero in poatrema hac e d i t i o n e . . . emendati et locupletati.

F r a n c o f u r t i ad Moenum: t y p i s e t

sumptibus Wechelianorum, apud Danielem e t Davidem Aubrios e t dementem Schleichium, 1027 .

l^to.

[ l 6 ] + 3 1 i f + [ 6 ] pp. Notes:

The t i t l e - p a g e i d e n t i f i e s t h i s work as

t h a t o f "P. Rami, eloquentiae e t mathematiciae disciplinarum p r o f e s s o r i s r e g i l , " a t i t l e to which Ramus, when l i v i n g , claim.

seems never to have l a i d

'.Vhen he turned to l e c t u r i n g on mathematics, [1+39]

he c a l l e d h i m s e l f

simply " r e g i u s p r o f e s s o r , " a s on

the t i t l e - p a g e of the 1 5 6 3 e d i t i o n of h i s O r a t i o de p r o f e s s i o n e l l b e r a l l u m a r t i u m .

I n the p a r l a n c e

of the day, the " p h i l o s o p h y " of h i s e a r l i e r

title,

r e g i u s p r o f e s s o r of eloquence and p h i l o s o p h y , would have been i n t e r p r e t a b l e a s i n c l u d i n g mathematics anyhow. Copies: Owa

CtY

Pbn

OLC Ps

Dt

r> Ou

MiU

i!Us

Os.1

Ps

THE CICERONIAN AND BRUTUS' PROBLEMS Ramus' m a n i f e s t o on e d u c a t i o n a l aims here combined with h i s l e c t u r e s

is

criticizing

C i c e r o ' s n o t i o n s on r h e t o r i c and on e d u c a t i o n i n general. C i t i n g be, Waddington l i s t s an e d i t i o n of these works dated " F r a n c o f u r t i : Rosa, 1 6 1 9 . "

Iohannes

There i s no such edition—Waddington

copied the p l a c e , p u b l i s h e r , and date from the preceding e n t r y i n b e .

707 P. Rami C i c e r o n i a n u s e t B r u t l n a e Basileae:

1574·

iiAo]

quaestiones.

Copies:

bc-p. 1328

708 Ciceronianus et Brutlnae quaestiones. Basileae: Petrus Perna, 1576.

Copies:

8vo.

i|l8 pp.

w

709 Ciceronianus et Brutlnae quaestiones. [Ed. by Iohannes Thomas Freiglus.] Petrus Perna, 1577· Copies: Lbm

BAu

Lbm

MUu

BEs

8vo. BSv

Occ

Ce Pbn

Basileae:

[l6]+i;l8+[22] pp. Cgc

Cu

Eni

Vbv

EXPLANATIONS OP SOME OF CICERO'S ORATIONS AND WRITINGS Here are listed the various collections of Ramus' works on Cicero, with or without similar works by other authore, or one or another additional work by Ramus himself.

Ramus' original prefaces

to these works are ordinarily replaced in these collected editions by briefer introductory notes.

[ψαι

Nancel, Petri Rami vita (1599)» P· 21» notes that Ramus' commentaries on some ten of Cicero's other orations remained unpublished.

710 In omnes Μ. T. Ciceronis orationes . . .

doctis-

simorum virorum enarrationes . . . partim etiam antea, partim nunc primum, in lucem editae. [Pref. by Iohannes Oporinus.]

Basileae: Ioannes

Oporinus, 1553» mense martio.

fol.

I: 2036 pp. Contents:

2 vols.

II: IOOI4.+ [36] pp. Commentaries by some I4.0 different

authors, including Johann Sturm, Antonio do Gouveia, and Melanchthon, and the following commentaries by Ramus: In orationem pro C. Rabirio . . . commentarius (Vol. I, p. 739)» I n

de

leg®

agraria . . . orationes tres praelectiones (II, 891), In Μ. T. Ciceronis in L. Catilinam orationes quatuor praelectiones (II, 957)· Copies:

BAu

Uu+2]

711 In omnes Μ. Τ. C i c e r o n i s o r a t i o n e s . . . d o c t i s simorum virorum e n a r r a t i o n o s . . . . by Iohannes O p o r i n u s . ]

[Pref.

Lugduni: Ioannes Tornae-

sius et Guilielmus Gazaeius, 155^· [lj.8] pp.+2896 c o l s .

fol.

2 v o l s . , c o l s , numbered

continuously. Contents:

commentaries by Bartnolomaeus Latomus,

C a e l i u s Secundus C u r i o , Ioachlmus Camerarius, P h i l i p Tvtelanchthon, V i t a s Amerpachius,

L^ger

Duchesne, Johann Sturm, and o t h e r s , and the

fol-

lowing p r a e l e c t i o n e s of Ramus: In . . . Pro Caio R a b i r i o orationem, In . . . orationes Copies:

De l e g e a g r a r i a

. . .

tres. Eu

REv

712 P e t r i Rami P r a e l e c t i o n e s i n C i c e r o n i s octo c o n s u l a r e s , una cum i p s i u s

[P. Rami] V i t a

per Ioannem Thomam Freigium c o l l e c t a . I . Perna, Copies:

lj.to.

orationes

Basileae:

60+5^8 pp.

w l i s t s t h i s as i n P s c , but i t i s not i n

[1(43]

the Psc catalogue, and its existence is so doubtful that its contents are not listed among the Individual Works.

713 Praelectiones in Ciceronis orationis octo consulares una cum ipsius [P. Rani] Vita per Ioannem Thomarn Freigiun collecta; reliqua sequens pagina dabit.

Basileae: Petrus Perna, 1575·

Vto.

6θ+5ίμ1 + [2] pp.+20 pp. numbered 1-20 between i|)|)| and ijij.9 (pp. l|45-ij-8 are non-existent, and pagination is otherwise chaotic throughout the book). Contents:

In addition to Preige's Vita Rami,

Robertus Britannus' De optlmo statu reipublicae dlalogus, and the Tabulae breves et expedltae in praeceptlones rhetoricae Georgll Cassandrl, the following works of Ramus': Basileae.—Oratio de studiis philosophiae et eloquentiae coniungendis.— Oratio linitio suae professionis] habita.--". T. Ciceronis In L. Catilinam orationes quatuor, P. Rami praelectionibus illustratae.--Μ. T. Ciceronis De lege agraria . . . orationes tres, P. Rami praelectionibus illustratae.--Μ. T. Ciceronis Pro C. Rabirio . . . oratio . . . P. Rami praelectioni-

EW]

bus i l l u s t r a t e . — Κ . Τ. Ciceronis De f a t o l i b e r , Rami praelectionibus e x p l i c a t u s . - - M . T. Ciceronis De optimo genere oratorum p r a e f a t i o . . .

P. Rami

praelectionibus i l l u s t r a t e . - - P i a t o n i s e p i s t o l a e a Petro Ramo l a t i n a e factae e t d i a l e c t i c i s rerum summis b r e v i t e r expositae.—Brutinae Notes:

quaestiones.

The Ce copy i s autographed "Georgius

Downamus." Copies:

AMu

BAu

GOu

Lbm

LEu

Oas

Occ

Occh

Ce

MH

Cgc

MUs

Omt

Owo

Eni Müs Pbn

Eu NcD Psc

Eu NPV VIu

Zz

nk

Praelectione s i n Ciceronis oration©s octo con— sulares, una cum ipsius Vita per Ioannem Thomam Freigium c o l l e c t a . 1560.

l^to.

B a s i l e a e : Petrus Perna,

6θ+6θ6+[ΐΙμ] pp. (much erroneous

numbering throughout). Contents:

In addition to P r e i g e ' s Vita Rami, the

f o l l o w i n g works of Ramus': B a s i l e a . - - O r a t i o de s t u d i i s philosophise e t eloquentiae coniungendis. Oratio [ i n i t i o suae p r o f e s s i o n i s ] habita.--M. T.

Ikk5]

Ciceronis In L. Catilinam oratione3 quatuor, P. Rami praelectionibus illu3tratae.--Κ. T. Ciceronis De lege agraria . . . orationes tres, P. Rami praelectionibus illuatratae.--Μ. T. Ciceronis Pro C. Rabirio . . . oratio . . . P. Rami praelectionibus illustrate.—Μ. T. Ciceronis De legibus liber primus, P. Rami . . . praelectionibua illustratus.—Μ. T. Ciceronis De fato, P. Rami praelectionibus explicatus.--Scipionis somnium ex sexto Μ. T. Ciceronis De republica libro, P. Rami praelectionibus explicatum.--M. T. Ciceronis De optimo genere oratorum praefatio . . . P. Rami praelectionibus illustrata.--Rhetoricae distinctiones in Quintilianum.--Platonis epistolae a Petro Ramo latinae factae et dialecticis rerum summia breviter expoaitae. Coplea: ICu

BAu

Lbm

(SAu)

Lw STnu

Ccc MBu Vbv

Ce

Caj

Ob

Occh

GOu

Gu

Pa

IU

Pbn

Pm

VIn

715 In Ciceronis orationea et scripta nonnulla omnes quae hactenus haberi potuerunt praelectiones . . • ·

Recena [a Ioanne Obsopoeo] in unum volumen

ordine congesta et accurate emendatae. [1Λ6]

Pranco-

furti: haeredes A. Wecheli, 1582.

8vo.

[8]+709+[22] pp. Contents: Μ. T. Ciceronis Pro C. Rabirio . . . oratio . . . P. Rami praelectionibus illustrata.—Μ. - Τ. Ciceroni3 De lege agraria . . . orationes tres» P. Rami praelectionibus illuatratae.—Κ. T. Ciceronis In L. Catilinam orationes quatuor, P. Rami praelectionibus illuatratae.—Μ. T. Ciceronis pro M. CI. Marcello oratio P. Rami praelectionibus illustrati.-Μ. T. Ciceronis Epistola nona ad P. Lentulem P. Rami praelectionibus illustrata.—Μ. T. Ciceronis De fato liber, P. Rami praelectionibus explicatus.—Somnium Scipionis ex sexto Μ. T. Ciceronis De republica libro, P. Rami praelectionibus explicatum.--M. T. Ciceronis De legibus liber primus, P. Rami praelectionibus explicatus.—Μ. T. Ciceronis De optimo genere oratorum praefatio . . . P. Rami praelectionibus illustrata. Copies:

AMu

BAu

GOu

Gu

Lbm+

LEu

NjP

Ob

Occ

Occh

Psc

Tv

Zz

Ce

Csj Lw Owa

[4VM

CtY

MAS Owo

Cu

MoSU Pbn

Eu Müs Pm

EXPLANATIONS OP VIRGIL'S BUCOLICS AND GEORGICS See the two separate works of Ramus' .

716» Publii Virgilli Maronls poemata . . . adiectis . · . doctissimorum virorum . . . scholiis. I. Frisius.]

[Ed. by

Zurich: G. Froschover, 1561.

8vo.

[16J+720 pp. Notes:

The annotations to the Bucolics and Georgics

are an amalgam, but the prefatory letter states that they are chiefly from Ramus. Copies:

(Lbm)

COLLECTED PREFACES, LETTERS, AND ORATIONS OP PETER RAMUS AND OMER TALON This Is a miscellany of short pieces by Ramus and his literary lieutenant Omer Talon.

717 Petri Rami, professoris regli, et Audomari Talaei Collectaneae praefationes, eplstolae, orationes · . . .

[Ed. by Nicolaus Bergeronus.]

iis: Dionysius Vallensls, 1577. [1+48]

8vo.

Paris-

[ 8 ] + 6 i 2 + [ 3 ] PP. Contents: Nicolaus Bergeronus l e c t o r i . » - D i o n y sius V a l l e n s i s amico lectori.—1^2 p r a e f a t i o n e s : Grauriaticae p r a e f a t i o n e e Rami quinque; Rhetoricae p r a e f a t i o n e s Rami e t Talaei sex;

Rhetoricae

p r a e f a t i o n e s Rami octo [the eighth i s r e a l l y by Talon]; Physicae p r a e f a t i o n e s Rami t r e e ;

Moralis

philosophiae Rami e t T a l a e i p r a e f a t i o n e s

tres;

Oratoriae e t philosophiae p r a e f a t i o n e s Rami e t T a l a e i tredecim [including, T a l a e i Academia]; Mathematicae p r a e f a t i o n e s Rami q u a t u o r . — l 6 e p i s t o l a e Rami: 1) Senatui Bononienai; Bononiensem responsio;

2) Ad Papium

3) I u l i o Monlucio Valen-

tinorum episcopo, lif. c a l . i a n . 1565«"

4 ) Iacobo

Acontio Tridentino, 11; c a l . i a n . 1565; Dio Londinensi, llf c a l . i a n . 1565; Academiae P a r i s i e n s i i d . o c t . 1569;

[1568];

5) Ioanni

6) R e c t o r i e t

7) Iacobo S c h e c i o ,

8) Iacobo Schecio, i d . s e p t . 1569;

9) Iacobus Schecius P e t r i Ramo, 15 mar. 1 5 6 9 ; 10) Iacobo Schecio, 10 c a l . a p r . 1569; Schecio, c a l . apr. 1569;

12) T[heodoroj B [ e z a e ]

V [ e z e l i o ] , 5 c a l . s e p t . 1569; P r e i g i o , [4. i u l . 1570; 16 aug. 1572;

11) Iacobo

13) Ioanni Thomae

1 4 ) Ioanni Thomae F r e i g i o ,

1 5 ) Carolo Lotharingo c a r d i n a l ! ;

[1A9]

16) Carolo Lotharingo c a r d i n a l i , 11 c a l . nov. 157Ο. — iij. orationes: 1 - 3 ) Tres orationes a tribus iiberalium disciplinarum professorlbus habltae . . .

. . .

1544 pridie nonas novembris, i ) A.

Talaei Oratio [de studiis r h e t o r i c i s ] ; i i )

Barth-

olomaei Alexandri Oratio [de studiis grammaticis]; iii)

P. Rami Oratio [De studiis mathematicis];

4 ) Oratio i n Gymnasio Praelorum habita 154-5» 5) Oratio

[de s t u d i i s philosophiae e t eloquentiae

eoniungendis ] ; 6) Pro philosophica

[Parisiensis

Academiae] d i s c i p l i n e o r a t i o ; 7) I n i t i o p r o f e s s i o n s suae; 8) Oratio de l e g a t i o n e ; 9) Oratio de l e g a t i o n e secunda; 10) Prooemium reformandae academiae P a r i s i e n s i s ; 11) Oratio de sua p r o f e s sione; 12-13) Actiones duae mathematicae; li).) Audomari T a l a e i

Ihere a pseudonym used by

Ramus] Admonitio ad Turnebum. Notes;

Waddington l i s t s these contents inaccur-

ately. Copies:

Au

BAu

BRr

Eni

Eu

Hu

(Lbm)

NhD

Ob

Ob

Pbn

Ps

Psc

Psg

Rba

Bu LEu

pbp Rbn

VIn. [1+50]

Ce MH

Pbp RMv

Csj

Dt

Müs Pi

MWA Pm

STnu

Pmp Uu

718 P. Rani . . . et A. Talaei Collectaneae praefationes, epistolae, orationes: quibus adiunctae sunt P. Rami Vita cum Testamento; eiusdem Basilea; pro Aristotele adversus Iacobum Seheckium'comparetio [sic for defensio], Ioannis Penae et Friderici Reisneri [sie] orationes . . . Hartmann.] 8vo.

[Sd. by Ioannes

Marpurgi: Paulus Egenolphus, 1599·

[8]+625+l5J PP.

Contents:

Same as the preceding work, plus:

Rami Praefatio in Virgilio Georgica.--Ioannis Penae De usu optices praefatio.—Frederic! Risneri [sicJ In Alhazeni Opticam praefatio.—Frederici Risneri [sic] In Vitellionis Opticam praefatio.— Vita Rami a Ioanne Thoma Freigio scripta.—Testamentum Rami.—Rami Basilea.—Rami Defensio pro Aristotele adversus Iacobum Schecium. Copies: GOu Zz

MAs

BEs MBu

Cm

Cm MiU

Cm Oj

Cej NjP

Ctc Pm

DLC STnu

Vbv

719 P. Rami . . .

e t A. T a l a e i Collectaneae p r a e f a t l o n e s ,

epistolae, orationes. Notes:

llarpurgi: 1609.

8vo.

For the l e t t e r to Rheticus which Waddington,

p . 4 7 1 , speculated may be found i n t h i s e d i t i o n , see note to I r o f e s s l o r e g i a (1576) above. Since the contents of t h i s e d i t i o n are d o u b t f u l , i f i t even exists—which i s j u s t as doubtful—no attempt i s made to include i t s hypot h e t i c a l p a r t s in the l i s t i n g s of i n d i v i d u a l works below. Copies:

s e - p . III4..

VARIOUS LETTERS Here i s l i s t e d i n c i d e n t a l

correspondence,

mostly unpublished before the nineteenth century. The more recent works here a r e , of course,

avail-

able in any number of l i b r a r i e s , and the l o c a t i o n of only one or two copies i s g i v e n . For other l e t t e r s , see 6 5 1 , 7 1 7 - 7 9 . D l a l e c t l c e s l l b r l duo . . . ([Lugduni Batavorum:] 1 5 9 9 ) ; a l s o Unedited and Lost works below. IW2]

720 "Lettres incites."

Pp. Zj.21-Z{.0 in Charles

Waddington, Ramus (Paris: Charles Meyrueis et Companie, 1855)· Contents:

8vo.

Dedication to Francis I, 15*1-3·—

Ioannl Hervagio, adolescenti, Lutetiae, 7 cal. ian. 1551.—Theodoro Zuingero, Heidelbergae, 3 cal. nov. 1569.—Theodoro Zuingero, Heidelbergae, 10 cal. feb. 1570.—Theodoro Zuingero, Francofurti, 10 cal. apr. 157Ο.—Theodoro Zuingero, Genevae, 11 iun. 1570.—Theodoro Zuingero, GenevHO, !). non. lul. 1570.—Theodoro Zuingero, 12 cal. aug. 1570.— Theodoro Zuingero, 5 cal. sept. 1570.—S. Grynaeo, Lausannae, 5 cal. sept. 1570.—Theodoro Zuingero, Lutetiae, mar. 1571«—Ioanni Sturmio, Lutetiae [ca. 6 mar. 1571]·--Β. Aretio, Lutetiae, cal. aug. 1571.—Henrico Bullingero, Lutetiae, cal. sept. 1571.—Theodoro Zuingero, Lutetiae, 3 non. sept. 1571.—Theodoro Zuingero, Lutetiae, non. dec. 1571.—Theodoro Zuingero, Lutetiae, non. ian. 1572.—Henrico Bullingero, Lutetiae, 3 mar. 1572.— Henrico Bullingero, Lutetiae, 1 9 mar. 1572.—Decano Facultatis artium Heidelbergensis academiae, 10 nov. 1569.

IU53]

Cooles:

Lbm

Pbn

721 "Lettre de Ramus ä Rod[olphe] C-walter et Louis Lavater a Zurich." Basileae, ii (or 11) cal. aug. 1569.

[Ed. by Augustin Bernus.]

Soci^td de

!.'histoire du Prote3tantieme fran^ais, Bulletin historique et litt^raire, XXXIX ( 1 8 9 0 ) , Notes:

30.

This acrimonious letter--it charges "fox-

like hypocrisy" (vulpina hypocrisls), etc.—protests againet the voces amblguas of Sulzer or Sulcerus regarding the Lord's Supper. Copies:

Pbn

Pbp

VARIA For theee incidental recently published items, only the first edition of the work which contains them is mentioned.

Since these works are

of course available in many libraries, the location of not more than one or two copies is here mentioned.

722 A few snippets, mostly from Ramus' Dialectlque (Paris: 1555)» are given on pp. 101^-111 in: Souquet, Paul (ed.) Les Ecrivalns p^dagogiques du XVI6 siecle.

Paris: C. Delagrave, 1880.

8vo.

Copies:

Lbm

Pbn

723 A brief extract in Vol. XVIII, p. 4.51: Warner, Charles Dudley (ed.).

Warner's Library of the

World's Best Literature. and Co., 1 8 9 6 . Copies:

New York: J. A. Hill

vols.

MH

[NOTE ON SPURIOUS WORKS] V/addington, pp. ^7^-76, gives a list of eleven works at one time or another falsely attributed to Ramus.

From a quite full knowledge

of library catalogues, I can state with certainty that there is no inclination today to attribute any of these works to Ramus, with the possible

1455]

exception of the Optlos In Four Books l i s t e d here above under Doubtful Works.

Expressing my general

agreement with Waddington's conclusions, I therefore r e f r a i n from repeating h i s l i s t . here the one work which i s s t i l l

But I do give

occasionally

f a l s e l y a t t r i b u t e d to Ramus and which Waddington does not mention.

724.» [Serres, Jean d e . ] taries . . .

The Three Partes of Commen-

of the C i v i l l Warres of Fr*"ince.

Translated out of Latine into English by Thomas Tiiime . . . . Notes;

London: P. Coldocke, I57lj..

In h i s dedicatory e p i s t l e , Timme errone-

ously a t t r i b u t e s h i s o r i g i n a l to Ramus.

Today

almost a l l l i b r a r y catalogues have the c o r r e c t a t t r i b u t i o n to S e r r e s .

See Tinme i n D. Ν. B.

The Fourth Parte . . . , o f t e n bound with the present Three Partes, i s not a t t r i b u t e d to Ramus, since i t covers the period 1571-7^, Ramus' own t r a g i c death. Cop i.es:

Lbm

[456]

including

[RAMUS' OWN WORK IN MS] Waddington, pp. IJ.72-74» l i s t s from various sources the following works of Ramus' which once e x i s t e d in manuscript but which seem a l l to have perished:

1) Commentarii i n C i c e r o n i s o r a t i o n e s

pro P. Quinctio, pro S . Roscio Americo, pro Q. Hoscio comoedo, e t Verrinas ordine septem. 2) Xenophontea quaedam. Aristotelis. Romanorum.

ij.) E t h i c a .

3) Comparatio P i a t o n i s e t 5) L i b e r de c o m i t i i s

6) Physica, Optica, Musica, Astronomica.

7) Matheraaticorum Graecorum corpus Latinum factum (under Ramus' d i r e c t i o n i f not i n p a r t by h i m ) . 8) E p i s t o l a e v a r i a e .

9) Scripta v a r i a .

Ramus and Ramism are c h i e f l y of i n t e r e s t i n terms o f the works of Ramus which achieved t h e i r tremendous c i r c u l a t i o n and i n f l u e n c e i n p r i n t , and the present Inventory i s concerned d i r e c t l y only with such works.

However, I add here such i n f o r -

mation as I have come upon concerning unpublished e x t a n t manuscripts.

725 B a s l e , U n i v e r s i t ä t s b i b l i o t h e k . - - T h i s l i b r a r y has a c o l l e c t i o n of some t h i r t y l e t t e r s i n manuscript,

dated from 1550 to 1572, the g r e a t e r part to Theodor Zwinger between 1570 and 1572.

Some o f

these l e t t e r s are published i n Waddington, but most remain unedited.—There are probably other manuscripts by d i s c i p l e s of Ramus to be found h e r · » taken down perhaps as d i c t a t i o n from Ramus' 1569-70 l e c t u r e s in B a s l e ·

726 P a r i s , Bibliotheque du Protestant!sme MS

fran^ais.—

730 contains copies of the following unpublished

l e t t e r s the o r i g i n a l of which are i n the S t a d t b i b liothek, i . e . ,

the Z e n t r a l b i b l i o t h e k , a t Zurich:

1) Ludovico Lavatero, 1568].

2) [Rudolpho] Gualthero, Lausannae, non.

s e p t . I57O. 1571.

[ B a s i l e a e , p r i d i e c a l . dec.

3) Gualthero, L u t e t i a e , 10 c a l . aug.

Gualthero, L u t e t i a e , c a l . i u l . 1572.

5) Gualthero, Lutetiae 17 i u l . 1572.

The MSS

include other items r e l a t i n g to Ramus but not by him, e . g . , a l e t t e r to him from Heinrich B u l l i n g e r , Tiguri (Zurich), 10 aug. 1572.

LWO]

727 Paris, Bibliotheque Nationale.--MS Fonds Latin

6659.

Entitled "Petri Rami Dialecticae

t i o n s ad Franciscum Valesium

parti-

Christianisslmum

Gallorum regem," this beautifully done manuscript was, as Waddington (p. 37) suggests, a presentation copy to the king. minated in gold.

undoubtedly

On vellum, illu-

15.9x22.5 cm.

[2J+39+U1

H ·

The text (i.e., of the preface) begins on fol. l r , and all after fol. 3 9 Γ Is blank.

Pol. 39**

concludes (in gold): "Finis .1543·" in red.

Pages ruled

Nowhere in the MS is there any title other

than the one Just given here.

Binding with arms of

Francis I. This MS represents probably the earliest extant condition of the text of Ramus' Dialecticae partltlonea, which in print are dedicated to the University of Paris, not to the King.

Waddington

assumes that the text of this MS is the same as that of the printed version.

It is, in fact, much

the same, but there are differences which are significant and which indicate, moreover, that this text is anterior to the texts In print.

For example,

the term particularls affirmatlo of the present MS

lk-59]

( f o l . l 6 r ) i s , in the second printed edition (Dlalectlcae l n s t i t u t l o n e s , 154-3» men3e septembria, f o l . 23 Γ ) rendered by a f f l r m a t i o s i n g u l a r ! 3 .

But

in the f i r s t printed edition (Dlalectlcae p a r t i tiones, 1543, f o l . l 6 ), the t e x t , otherwise wordfor-word that of the present MS, has likewise a l t e r e d p a r t l c u l a r l s to s l n g u l a r l s .

Such changes

seem to Indicate that the f i r s t printed edition i s from a text l a t e r than the present MS. In the preface, rather more than the f i r s t two pages mentioned by Waddington d i f f e r from the printed preface, but for the most p a r t , the d i f f e r ences consist simply in the f a c t that the eulogies In the MS are made to r e f e r to the King, those in the printed e d i t i o n to the University.

In p l a c e s ,

apart from the word r e f e r r i n g to one or the other of these dedicatees, the eulogies are i d e n t i c a l , word-for-word: the conventional v i r t u e s celebrated form a matrix with a replaceable center, where king, university, or anything e l s e requiring eulogy can be f i t t e d .

[1*60]

728

Strasbourg, Archives du Chapitre de St-Thomas.-These archives possess the MS of a l e t t e r from Ramus to Johann Sturm dated 1572 (without further dating).

This i s probably the l e t t e r IVaddington

prints on p. 432.

729 Vatican City« Biblioteoa Apostolica Vaticana.

See

note to Dialecticae p a r t i t l o n e s (mense septembris 15^3) among Individual Works above·

730 Zurich, Zentralbibliothek.—There i s a s e r i e s of MS l e t t e r s of Ramus' in t h i s l i b r a i y , many, i f not a l l , unprinted.

[1+61]

[ADAPTATIONS Ο?· RAMUS' WORK BY OTHERS IN MS ] Only a few p a r t i c u l a r l y i n t e r e s t i n g manuscripts are given h e r e .

Classroom

early

transcrip-

t i o n s o f Ramist d i a l e c t i c or r h e t o r i c by s t u d e n t s must e x i s t i n hundreds o f s c a t t e r e d m a n u s c r i p t s . Some o f these are mentioned i n Perry M i l l e r ,

The

New England Mind (1939)» PP· 1 2 0 - 2 2 .

731 London, B r i t i s h Museum.—Addit. MS J/4.361: Abraham?]

[Fraunce,

The Sheapeardes L o g i k e : conteyning the

p r a e c e p t s o f t h a t a r t put downe by Ramus; examples f e t owt o f the Sheapeards Kalender, Notes and e x p o s i t i o n s c o l l e c t e d owt of Beurhusius, and C h a t t e r t o n , and d i v e r s o t h e r s . twooe g e n e r a l d i s c o u r s e s ,

Piscator,

Together with

the one touching the

p r a i s e and ryghte use o f Logike: the o t h e r concernynge the comparison o f Ramus h i s Logike with t h a t of A r i s t o t l e . Edwarde Dyer.

To the Ryght worshypful Master

fol.

36 1 1 .

This MS i n c l u d e s , of Ramus' D i a l e c t i c .

i n s u b s t a n c e , the

text

I t i s very l i k e l y an e x e r -

c i s e by Fraunce done while studying or p o s s i b l y t u t o r i n g , and hence would date probably somewhere [1*62]

around 1580· On fol. [32], there begins "A bryef and general comparison of Ramus his Logike with that of Aristotle, to . . · Master Philip Sydney."

732 London, British Museum.—MS Harleian 6796 art. 17, fols. 81-15^: Annotationes in Rami Geometriam; subiectitur praeffatio] mathematics ad Cantabrigienses habita anno 1588. This anonymous MS is bound with several others in Thomas Hobbes1 own handwriting.

733 Oxford, Bodleian Library.—Rawlinson MS D. 3^5» entitled Emblemata varia. Fraunce, Abraham.

Pols. 1-16 contain:

[Tractatus de usu dialec-

tices. ] Dating probably from before 1588 and obviously a youthful piece of work, rather precious and taut, this unedited tract is shot through with Ramus' Dialectic.

It is dedicated to Sir

Philip Sidney and bears on the title-page the motto: "Platonem admiror, amo Aristotelem, Ramum ubique non reprehendo." llbrl duo . . • .

Cf. above Dlalectlcae

(Ultraiecti, 1658), note;

also Praunce's editions of the Ramist Dialectlca (1588) and Rhetorlca (1588, 1 9 5 0 ) .

This motto

of Praunce'e Is obviously connected with the title-page motto of the Ramist William Ames which is related to the Harvard seal in Samuel Eliot Morison, The Founding of Harvard College (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1 9 3 5 ) , pp. 3 3 0 - 3 1 .

ADDRESS [ON THE STUDY OF RHETORIC] In this oration at the opening of the school year following the injunction laid on Ramus to discontinue teaching philosophy, Talon protests that he devotes his time "to the lighter studies of the arts" rather than to the "more serious studies of medicine or law or theology" [ 1*61*1

because of his friendship f o r Peter Ramus and Bartholomew Alexander and because of the importance of rhetoric

itself.

0 Audomari Talaei Oratio [de studiis r h e t o r i c i s ] . In 31([151Λ1).

0 In 717 (1577).

0 In 718 (1599)·

TRAINING IN ORATORY Same as 38 (1545) — 4l (1548).

DIALECTICAL EXPLANATIONS OP PORPHYRY Porphyry's Isagoge or Introduction to A r i s t o t l e ' s l o g i c a l treatises i s here translated

[465)

from the Greek in "plain style" Latin by Talon (see his-preface to Sabellus) and interspersed with commentary about the length of the Isagoge itself.

The introductory "De libris Organi dialec-

tici" questions the authenticity of the books of the Organon« This is an attempted annihilation of Porphyry complementing Ramus' attack on Aristotle in the Remarks on Aristotle.

Published with

Talon's name on the title-page, this work is presumably by Talon, but it is practically certain that Ramus, on whom Talon elsewhere avows his dependence, had some hand in it.

There are even

good grounds for suspecting—but not for proving-Uiat Ramus is the author of the work (apart perhaps from the translation proper of Porphyry): 1) Ramus was still forbidden to publish philosophical works, so he should have had to use a pseudonym; 2) he published an edition of his Training in Dialectic, slightly doctored, this same year using Talon's name as a pseudonym; 3) Talon published no other such logical work save the commentary on Ramus' own Dialectic, which commentary Ramus considered somewhat his own private property, £14-66]

subject to alteration at his own pleasure.

If

Ramus wrote this present work, Talon may well have given it, in substance, as his own class lectures anyhow, since it consists, of course, of printed class lectures.

73k Audomari Talaei Dialecticae praelectiones in Porphyrium ad Ioannem Sabellum Canonicum Carnotensem.

Parislis: M. David, 15^7«

8vo.

72 pp.

Notes:

The preface to Sabellus closes "Lutetiae

a gymnaaio Praeleorum nonis Augusti" without year. Copies:

Ob

Pa+

Psc

Su

VIn

735 Dialecticae praelectiones in Porphyrium Paris lis: Ioannes Roigny, 154-7 · Copies:

. . . .

8vo.

72 pp.

Gu

736 Dialecticae praelectiones in Porphyrium

. . . .

Parisiis: M. David, 1550, prid. cal. mail. 78 pp. [1l67]

8vo.

Copies:

BEs

Rbc

Tv

73? D i a l e c t i c a e p r a e l e c t l o n e s In Porphyrlum . . . . Lugdunl: Theobaldus Paganus, 1553·

8vo.

77 PP. Copies:

VIn

0

In 752 (1583).

0 In 751 (1584)·

THE ACADEMY In t h i s l e c t u r e , Talon defends Ramus and Plato as true Academicians against A r i s t o t l e and the A r i s t o t e l i a n s as P e r i p a t e t i c s .

0 In 757 (15^7).

[1*68]

m 755 (1550) ο in 756 (1550) ο In 753 (1575) 0 In 75k (1576) 0 In 717 (1577) 0 In 752 (1583) 0 In 718 (1599) 0 In 751 (1584)

EXHjANATION OF THE FRAGMENT OF CICERO'S ACADEKICA This I s t h e f r a g m e n t of C i c e r o ' s of the f i r s t p a r t of h i s Academlca

revision

interspersed

w i t h commentary more t h a n twice the l e n g t h of t h e text i t s e l f .

There i s no i n i t i a l argument g i v e n ,

b u t d i a l e c t i c a l summaries a r e o c c a s i o n a l l y p r o vided.

0 In 757 ( I S i t f ) .

0

I n 755 ( 1 5 5 0 ) .

0

I n 756 ( 1 5 5 0 ) .

0

I n 753 ( 1 5 7 5 ) .

0

I n 754 ( 1 5 7 6 ) . Cl+70] 0 I n 752 ( 1 5 8 3 ) .

ο in 751 (1584).

RHETORIC Same as 58 (15^8) —

182 (1950).

COMMENTARIES ON CICERO'S LUCULLUS This consists of Cicero's text, which is a continuation of the first part of his Academlca called the fragmentum in the preceding work here, interspersed with comnentary about the same length as the text.

There is no initial argument given,

but dialectical summaries, labeled as such, are provided.

0

In 755 (1550).

0

In 756 (1550).

[1*71]

ο In 753 (1575)·

Ο in 75k (1576).

Ο

In 752 (1583).

Ο In 751 (15614.).

EXPLANATION OP THE FIRST BOOK OP ARISTOTLE'S ETHICS This consists of Aristotle's text from the Mlcomachean Ethics Interspersed with commentary half again as long as the text. The commentary attacks Aristotle as unchristian and given to inept and false distinctions and to unwise distribution of ends.

738 Audomari Talaei In primum Arlstotells Ethicum llbrum explicatlo ad Carolum Lotharingum Cardinalem Gulsi-

[1*72]

anum.

P a r i s i i s : Μ. David, 1550·

Ifto in 8 ' s .

80 pp. Notes:

The preface to the Cardinal of Guise i s

undated. Copies: Occh

BSv Opb

BSv PVu

Eni Su

GEpu Tv

0 In 753 (1575). 0 In 754 (1576). 0 In 752 (1583). 0 In 751 (158/j.).

[473]

MH

Ob

Ob

CICERO4S TOPICS EXPLAINED This c o n s i s t s o f C i c e r o ' s t e x t

inter-

spersed with commentary three times as l o n g .

The

argumentum f o r the whole a t the beginning o f the 1583 e d i t i o n i s i n the 1 5 5 0 e d i t i o n c a l l e d praefatlo.

739 M. Tul [ H i ] C i c e r o n i s ad C[aiumj Trebatium consultum T o p i c a , Audomari T a l a e i explicata, docinum.

praelectionibus

ad Carolum Borbonium Cardinalem VinP a r i s i i s : M. David, 1550» non. nov.

4to in 8 ' s . Notes:

iuris-

74 PP·

Table ( i n Occh c o p y ) .

T a l o n ' s p r e f a c e i s dated 6 c a l . nov. 1 5 5 0 .

The t a b l e i s a f u l l y dichotomized d i s p l a y o f the oration. The Oas copy belonged to G a b r i e l Harvey, who notes on p. 74 t h a t he went through the work i n I57O and a g a i n , much more c a r e f u l l y ,

i n 1579

when, a t long l a s t , he got down to the study of c i v i l law: " G a b r i e l Harveius Calendis F e b r u a r i . 157Ο.

Multo etiam d i l i g e n t i u s ,

1579·

aliquando i u r i s c i v i l i s incumbens."

Tantum The margins

of t h i s copy, bound with T a l o n ' s Acad., In Acad. W7W

C i e . , In Luc. (David, 1550), are black with notes by Harvey unknown to G. C. Moore Smith in h i s edition Gabriel Harvey's Marginalia

(Stratford-upon-

Avon, 1 9 1 3 ) . Copies:

Oaa

Occh

Ku

0

In 753 ( 1 5 7 5 ) . 0

In 754 ( 1 5 7 6 ) .

7ij.O Μ. T. Ciceronis . . . Toplca, cum argumentis T a l a e i e t annotatlonibus doctissimorura virorum margini a d s c r i p t i s . Notea:

ij.to.

18 1 1 .

T a l o n ' s argumentum i s given i n f u l l .

The

marginal notes from the other "very learned men" are only Lbm t i n y snippets. Copies:

1475]

ο In 752 (1583).

Ο In 751 (15Ö4)·

CICERO'S DIVISIONS OF ORATORY ELUCIDATED In Its complete form, this work consists of the text of Cicero interspersed with commentary totaling about a third of the text.

Talon pro-

vides no initial argument and no dialectical summaries·

71*1 In M. Tullii Ciceronis Partitiones oratoriae annotationes collectae ex praelectionibus Audomari Talaei.

Lutetiae: Μ. David, 1551 ·

i(.to.

19 pp. Notes:

Talon's cosnentary in fulls Cicero's text

is omitted except for the lnclplt of each section conmented on. Copies:

Cu

Lbm

Mbn

Ob [1+76]

ο I n 69 ( 1 5 5 3 ) .

71»2 Pp. 258-66 I n : Μ. Τ . C i c e r o n i s P a r t i t l o n e s oratorlae . . .

cam commentariis I[acobua] Strebaeus,

3artholomael Latomi, Chrlstophorl Hegendorphini, Ioannia Fossanl, A d r i a n ! Turnebl (qui adhuc l n acrlptua est conmentarlus i n c e r t l a u t h o r i s ) , poatremo a d i e c t i s praelectlonlbua Audomarl T a l a e l , denlque S p e c l l e g l a Leodegarll a Quercu reoognlta . • . ·

P a r i a l l a : G a b r i e l Buonlus, 1566.

[ 1 2 ] + 2 6 6 + [ l l ] pp. (p. 266 misnumbered 2 1 9 ) . Copies:

Cu

Gu

0 I n 752 ( 1 5 8 3 ) . 0 I n 751 (1584).

[14-773

l^to.

CICERO'S PARADOXA EXPLAINED C i c e r o ' s t e x t i s i n t e r s p e r s e d here with commentary much longer than the t e x t

itself.

Talon s u p p l i e s no argumentum f o r the work as a whole, but does supply many d i a l e c t i c a l

summaries,

each l a b e l e d as such.

7>+3 Μ. T u l l i i C i c e r o n i s Paradoxa, ad Marcum Brutun, Audomari T a l a e i commentationibus e x p l i c a t a ad Carolum Lotharingum Cardinalem.

Lutetiae:

Carolus Stephanus, 1551» 13 c a l . i a n . l|to. Copies:

[=1552]·

52 pp. CtY

NjP

Pag

7 lih Μ. T . C i c e r o n i s Paradoxa ad Marcum Brutum, cum annotationibus F r [ a n c i s c i J

Sylvii, Xysti

i n c e r t l cuiusdam a u c t o r i s ,

B [ a r t h o l o m a e i ] Latomi,

e t Audomari T a l a e i margin! a d i u n c t i s . G a b r i e l Buon, 157If. Notas:

i^to.

Betuleii,

Parisiis:

Χλμ 1 1 .

T a l o n ' s commentary interwoven with t h a t

of the o t h e r s and the whole c l i p p e d to s h o r t [14-78]

marginal

glosses.

Copies:

Lbm

0 I n 753

(1575)·

0 i n 751* ( 1 5 7 6 ) .

0 In 752

(1583).

0 I n 751 (1581*).

CICERO'S THREE DIALOGUES ON THE ORATOR ELUCIDATED C i c e r o ' s t e x t i s here i n t e r s p e r s e d with commentary about equaling i t i n l e n g t h .

The

initial

argumentum» a s i t i s c a l l e d i n the 1583 e d i t i o n , f o r a l l t h r e e books was e a r l i e r , a s i n the 1575 edition,

styled expllcatlone3.

Dialectical

sum-

maries are provided throughout, being l a b e l e d a s such. [1*79]

745 Μ. Tullil Clceronls De orator© ad Qulntum fratrem dialogi tree, Audoraarl Talael expllcatlonlbus illustrati. 4to.

Parisiis: Carolua Stephanus, 1553·

106+[2]+135+[l]+91 PP. (each dlalogua

paginated separately). Notes:

The Occh copy la Inscribed "Ioh. Gerardus

Voaalua."

Copies:

Au

Lbm

MoSD

Occh

Pbn

0

In 753 (1575)·

0 In 754 (1576). 746 A. Talael In Μ. T. Ciceronis De oratore llbros I-III comraentarlus.

Vol. II, pp. [vll]-[xll],

1-165» in: Μ. T. Cicero Mannucclorum conmentarlls lllustratas antiquaeque lectlonl restitutus. 10 vols.

Venetlls: apud Aldum lex typographla

G. Angelerll], 1578-83.

[480]

Copies:

CtY

Lbm

0 In 752 (1583).

0 In 751 (1581f) ·

PETER RAMUS' DIALECTIC IN TWO BOOKS, ELUCIDATED WITH EXPLANATIONS BY OMER TALON Same as 239 d 5 5 6 ) — lj.72 ( 1 9 3 5 ) .

w i t h the

exception of those editions which do not include Talon's praelectlones.

ORATIONS ON THE VALUE OP THE ROYAL STATION These are orations purportedly got up and delivered by pupils of Talon under his supervision. The "scholae Francorum" where they were delivered were apparently lecture halls belonging to the French "Nation" at P a r i s — c f . the similar "scholae Picardorum" of the Picard Nation In the following title.

[TO

7l+7 Quinque o r a t i o n e s de laude r e g i a e d i g n i t a t i s , quinque d i s c i p u l i s Audomari T a l a e i h a b i t a e

a

Parisiis

i n a c h o l i s Francorum quinto c a l e n d . decemb. 15^-8. Parisiis: Contents:

M. David, 154-8.

l+to.

22 p p .

The f o l l o w i n g o r a t i o n s p r e s e n t e d a s b y ,

or a t l e a s t d e l i v e r e d by, these students of

Talon's:

I o a n n i s G u e r i n u s , Quod prima regum o r i g o f u e r i t a virtute;

Claudius D u b r e l l i u s ,

Quod u t i l i u s

s i t rem-

publioara a rege g u b e r n a r i quam a populo v e l ab optimatibus; Arturus S c a l l a i u s ,

Quid i n t e r s i t

regem e t tyrannum; F r a n c i s c u s B a l l e r i u s ,

inter

Quod r e x

s u b d i t u s s i t l e g i b u s ; Antonius Aguinus, Quod r e x p a s t o r appellandus Copies:

sit.

Pbn

7i|8

Quinque o r a t i o n e s de laude r e g i a e d i g n i t a t i s .

.

.

Pp. 2 9 5 - 3 2 0 i n : Iohannes Thomas P r e i g i u s .

Q u a e s t i o n e s oeconoraicae e t p o l i t i c a e ; quibusdam . . .

cum a l i i s

doctorum virorum c o m m e n t a t i o n i b u s .

Basileae: Sebastianus Henricpetri, martio.

.

8vo. [1+82]

1 5 7 8 , mense

Cocies:

Cu

Cu

Cu

Pbn+

7ΐμ9 Quinque orationes de laude r e g i a e d i g n i t a t i s . · . .

Pp. 295-320 i n : Iohannes Thomas F r e i g i u s .

Quaestiones oeconomicae e t p o l i t i o a e ; cum a l i i s quibusdam . . .

doctorum virorum commentationibus.

B a s i l e a e : Sebastianus H e n r i c p e t r i , 1591» martio. Copies:

mense

8vo. Pbn+

FIVE ORATIONS ON ARISTOTLE'S MORAL PHILOSOPHY These are more o r a t i o n s l i k e those o f the preceding e n t r y . 750 Quinque orationes de morali philosophia A r i s t o t e l i s a quinque d i s c i p u l l s Audomari T a l a e i habitae P a r i s i i s in s c h o l i s Picardorum quinto calend. decemb. 1 5 4 8 ·

P a r i s i i s : M. David, 1548.

30 pp.

[UB3]

lj.to.

Contents:

The following oratione presented as b y ,

or a t l e a s t d e l i v e r e d by, these students of Talon'β: Petrus Masparautlus, Quod f e l i c i t a 3 ab A r l s t o t e l e r e c t e d e f l n i a t u r ; Pranclscus Sevinus, Quod A r i s t o t e l e s non r e c t e f e l i c i t a t e m d e f i n i a t ; Ambrosius B a l l e r i u s , Quod A r i s t o t e l i s doctrina de v i r t u t e s i t l e g i t i m e e t v e r a ; Antonius Fouquelinus, Quod A r i s t o t e l i s doctrina de v i r t u t e nec l e g i t i m e nec vera s i t ; Claudius Dambraneus, Quails s i t A r i s t o t e l i s doctrina de moribus. Kotes:

Antonius Fouquelinus i s , of c o u r s e , Antoine

Fouquelin or F o e l i n , whose adaptation

of the

Talon Rhetorica to French was published i n 1 5 5 5 a s the companion piece to the f i r s t e d i t i o n of Ramus' Dlalectlque. Copies:

Pa

See

71,

74.

Pbn

WORKS INDISPENSIBLE FOR THOSE DESIRING A SOCRATIC AND METHODICAL PHILOSOPHY This i s the n e a r l y complete e d i t i o n of Talon, not to be confused with the next two t i t l e s , of which t h i s t i t l e i s a kind of c o n f l a t i o n . [WW

This

c o l l e c t i o n omits only Talon's Address [on the Study of Rhetoric] and h i s praelectlonea to Ramus' D i a l e c t i c published with t h i s l a t t e r work. The t i t l e of t h i s "portable Talon," like that of the Opera e l e g . meth. p h l l . stud, pern, below, seems to be an e f f o r t to echo the t i t l e of Albert of Saxony's famous F e r u t l l l s l o g l c a .

751 Audomari Talaei quem Petri Rami Theseum dicere iure poasis Opera Socraticae methodicaeque philosophiae s t u d i o s i s pernecessaria

. . . .

Basileae: ex o f f i c i n a Pernae per Conr[adum] Vvaldkirch, 158J4.. Contents:

4to.

[8]+6l4+I36] pp.

[Preliminary matter: preface signed

"Christiana« philosophiae studiosus"; dedicatory verses].—Ciceronia De oratore . . . d i a l o g i tree i l l u e t r a t i . — C i c e r o n i s Topica . . . i l l u s t r a t e . - Ciceronis De p a r t i t i o n e oratoria dialogue i l l u s tratus.--Academia.—In Academicum Ciceronis f r a g mentum e x p l i c a t i o . — In Lucullum Ciceronis.— Ciceronis Paradoxa [ i l l u s t r a t e ] . — P r a e l e c t i o n e s in Porphyrium.—Praelectiones i n primum A r i s t o t e l i s Ethicum librum.—Rhetorica [with Ramus' preface [UÖ51

beginning "Habes, - Lector . . . .»" but without Ramus' praelectlones].--Admonltio ad Turnebum [really by Ramus].--Index. Copies:

Bu

Cu

Owo

Pbn

Psg

STnu

Vbv

VIn

EXPLANATIONS OP CICERO, PORPHYRY, AND ARISTOTLE See remarks with the preceding work.

752 Audomarl Talaei Praelectlones in Ciceronem, Porphyrii Isagogen, et Aristotelis primum librum Ethicum . . . nunc dernum in usum Socraticae phllosophlae studiosorum . . . editae [a Ioanne Obsopoeo]. 1583. Contents:

Francofurti: haeredes A. Wecheli,

8vo.

[8]+1124+[IJ.6] pp.

After the preliminary matter {"Ioannes

Obsopoeus studioso lectori," and "Ad lectorem Ioannes Martinus Oltingerus"), the same as in 751 except that the Rhetorica is omitted.

The

works occur in a different order and with slightly variant titles. I486]

Copies: Su

Bu

VIn

Ku

Lbm

MA 3

Ob

Opb

Pbn

Zz

WORKS INDISPENSIBLE FOR THOSE DESIRING AN ELEGANT METHODICAL PHILOSOPHY This i s a more l i m i t e d s e l e c t i o n than the foregoing c o l l e c t i o n s ,

q.v«

753 Audomarl T a l a e i quem P e t r i Rami Theseum d i c e r e lure p o s s l s Opera e l e g a n t i o r l s methodicae p h i l o sophlae s t u d i o s i s p e r n e c e s s a r i a . Thomas F r e i g i u s . ] l|.to.

[8]+706 pp.

Contents;

[Ed. by Ioannes

B a s l l e a e : Petrus Perna, 1 5 7 5 * Table.

[Preliminary matter: " F r e i g l i P r a e f a t i o " ;

"Typographus l e c t o r i " ; dedicatory v e r s e s ] . — Academia.—In Academlcum C l c e r o n i s fragmentum exp l l c a t l o . — I n Lucullum Clceronis commentaril.— C l c e r o n i s De oratore . . . d i a l o g i t r e s , A. T a l a e i e x p l i c a t i o n i b u s i l l u s t r a t i . - - C l c e r o n i s . . . Toplca, A. T a l a e i p r a e l e c t l o n i b u s Paradoxa . . .

explicata.—Clceronis

A. T a l a e i comnentationlbus e x p l i c a t a . — [UB71

In primum A r i s t o t e l i s Ethicum librum. Notes:

Despite the s l i g h t l y varying t i t l e s ,

these

works are quite the same as the corresponding items in 751Copies:

Ba

Bu

LVb

MUs

Ob

Rbn

SAu

Vbv

Cu Ob

Dm Occ

Eu

Hu

Owa

Pbn

Lbm Pm

Rbc

754 Opera e l e g a n t i o r i s methodicae philosophlae studiosis pernecessaria. Freigiue.] lj.to.

B a s i l e a e : Petrus Perna, 157&·

[8J+706 pp.

Copies: MAs

[Ed. by Ioannes Thomas

BAu

Ob

Oo

Cu

Cu

GOu

Gu

HAk

Ku

Oq

THE ACADEMY, ON CICERO'S ACADEMICA FRAGMENT AND LUCULLUS Talon's defence of the Ramist philosophical program i s here combined with h i s explanation of C i c e r o ' s discussion o f philosophical schools. [lj-88]

See

these separate works above.

755 Audomari Talaei Academia ; eiusdem In Academicum Ciceronis fragmentum explicatio; item In Lucullum comnentarii . . . . id. mail. Notes:

Parisiis: M. David, 1550»

lj.to in 8«s.

74+[2]+122+[10] pp.

In Luc, coram, has a separate title-page

(Pari3iis: M. David, 1550) and separate pagination (pp. [1]-122), but the index which follows, pp. [1]+[10] includes all three parts. Copies:

BEs

(Bu—In Luc, only)

(Ck—In Luc, only) only) Pbn

MoSlI Psc

PVu

Eni

Müs? Rbn

Cch

(Lbm—Acad, and In Acad,

Oas Vln

Ob

Ob

Occh

Occh

Zz_

756 Academia; eiusdem in Academicum Ciceronis fragmentum explicatio ; item in Lucullum commentarii . . . .

Parisiis: Ludovicus C-randinus, 1550.

lj.to in 8's. Notes;

74+[2]+122+[10] pp.

The same separate title-page, etc., as in

the 1550 David issue above. IM»9]

Copies:

Müs?

Ob

THE ACADEMY, AND ON CICERO'S ACADEMICA FRAGMENT See the preceding

entry.

757 Audomarl T a l a e i Academia; eiusdem I n Academicum C l c e r o n i s fragmentum e x p l i c a t i o . David, 151+.7. Copies:

Müs

8vo. Ob

L u t e t i a e : Μ.

47+tl]+87+[l] Pa

Pm

Psc

PP·

Rba

COLLECTED PREFACES, LETTERS, AND ORATIONS OF PETER RAMUS AND OMER TALON

0 P e t r i Rami . . .

e t Audomari T a l a e i

praefationea, epistolae,

orationes

Same as 717 ( 1 5 7 7 ) .

(490]

Collectaneae . . . . - -

ο P. Rami . . . et A. Talaei Collectaneae praefationes, epistolae, orationes . . . .

—

Same as 718 (1599)·

0 P. Rami . . . et Α. Talaei Collectaneae praefationes, epistolae, orationes.

—

Same as 719 (I609). Motes:

As noted in the Ramus section of the

Inventory, the existence of this edition is doubtful.

No attempt is made to include its

hypothetical parts in the listings of the individual works above.

[Itfl]

THE RAMIST CONTROVERSIES Out of the works in the foregoing Inventory, there grow the Ramist controversies which divided Cambridge University and many continental universities against themselves and which are referred to in Perry Miller, The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century, ill Miss Tuve's Elizabethan and Metaphysical Imagery, in Miss Seaton's edition of Abraham Fraunce's Arcadian Rhetorike, in Peter Munz, Hooker in the History of Thought, and in countless works on Edmund Spenser, John Milton, and other Elizabethans and Jacobeans, not to mention the Parnassus plays, works of Marlowe and Jonson, and unnumbered contemporary sources·

Most of these con-

troversies have never really been studied, and the very sequence of the attacks and counter-attacks involved has remained baffling, even to the authors of the recent studies just cited. The controversies proliferate endlessly and continue to echo, particularly out of the German Ramist milieu and through Kant, into our own day.

I do not

pretend to Include all the Ramist disputes here, but only to indicate the sequence of the various works in the initial controversies and to locate copies of each work (except those by Ramus himself, already located in the foregoing Inventory).

These initial controversies form LU.92]

rather tidy units and hence invite further study by those interested in the formation of the modern mind and sensibility.

Countless individual attacks on Ramus or de-

fences of his stands, such as Jean Dorat's or William Ames's, invite no special listing in series with other worke and are so numerous that they cannot possibly be attended to here·

Many works of such a sort are touched

on in Waddington or in my own work, Ramus, Method and the Decay of Dialogue which this Inventory supplements. The presence of an unusually large number of the works here listed in the library of Trinity College, Dublin, is itself a relic of the Ramist controversies, being due to the Ramist controversialist Sir William Temple (the elder, 1555-1627), Sir Philip Sidney's secretary, who served as fourth provost of Trinity College. The controversies to which attention is called are, then, the following, in the order in which they developed (all the works were first published at Paria unlese otherwise indicated).

I.

THE GOUVEIA-RAMUS ARISTOTELIAN QUARREL (ca. 15^0-43)— The attack on Ramus by another Paris teacher of logic (later jurist) whose logical works had preceded Ramus· own reform.

There are a good many

recent Portuguese studies of Antonio de Gouveia, traceable through the Biblioteca Nacional, Lisbon. [^4-93]

ca. 1540·

Antonio de Gouveia publishes various

logical works, including his De conclusionlbus llbellus, which he later lists among the worke that he maintains Ramus drew on for his 15^3 attacks on Aristotle—see Gouveia, Pro Arlstotele responslo (l543)t fol. 2.

In his

introductory life of Gouveia in Gouveia's Opera lurldlca, phllologlca, phllosophlca (Roterodami, 1766), which does not include the De conclusionlbus llbellus, Jacob van Vaassen cites (p. 29) two editions of this latter work: Paris, Morellus, 15^0 (already the third edition), and Paris, Guillielmus Le Bret, 1545· copies are located.

I cannot say where

There are none of any edition in the

British Museum or in the Bibliotheque Nationale at Paris. 1

5^-3

Ramus, Dlaleotlcae partltlones (later

called Dlalectlcae instltutlones) and Arlstotellcae animadverslones, which draw on Gouveia, the latter maintains . Gouveia, Pro Aristotele responslo adversus P. Rami calumnlas . • •

Copies in Lbm, Pbn, Pm.

This

precipitates the suit of the University against Ramus, in which Gouveia served as one of the anti-Ramus members of the commission.

This work is reprinted in Gouveia, Opera

lurldica, phllologlca, phllosophlca (Roterodami, 1 7 6 6 ) , pp. 785-815--copies in CtY, Lbm, MoSU, Pbn; and, in facsimile from the 15^3 edition with a not too satisfactory [ItfW

Portuguese t r a n s l a t i o n and introduction by the n o v e l i s t Aquilino R i b e i r o , as Antonio de Gouveia, Em p r o ! de A r i s t d t e l e s (Lisbon: L i v r a r i a Bertrand, 1 9 ^ 0 ) .

For a

c r i t i q u e of the t r a n s l a t i o n , see A. Soarez P i n h e i r o , "0 l i v r a 'Responsio' de Antonio de Gouveia, traduzido por Aquilino R i b e i r o , B r o t ^ r l a (Lisbon), XXXII (1941)» 56.

II.

THE PERION ATTACK ON RAMUS' ANTI-ARISTOTELIANISM AND ANTI-CICERONIANISM (1543 AND 1547).—Joachim de Perion, Benedictine doctor of theology, extreme H e l l e n i s t , and propounder of not a few f a l s e etymologies, defends the ancients against Ramus. Less s o l i d l y learned than Gouveia, he i s a more florid orator.

1543·

Ramus, D l a l e c t l c a e p a r t i t lone a ( D l a l e c -

t i c a e i n s t l t u t i o n e s ) and A r l s t o t e l l c a e 1543·

anlmadversiones.

Perion, Pro A r l s t o t e l e i n Petrum Ramum

oratlones I I ; elusdem De d l a l e c t l c a l i b e r I .

Copies in

Pbn and Pm, but the Pbn copy contains only the f i r s t oration against A r i s t o t l e and nothing more.

The f i r s t

and second o r a t i o n s can both be found i n Perion, De d l a l e c t l c a l i b r i I I I ; elusdem Oratlones duae pro A r l s t o t e l e . . . in Petrum Ramum; C a e l l i Secundi Curlonis in [4953

eosdem P e r i o n l l De d l a l e c t i c a l l b r o s

. . . .

15^-9

B a s l e e d i t i o n i n Cu; [ 1 5 5 4 J B a s l e E d i t i o n i n Pbn.

The

Pbn copy of P e r i o n , Oratio i n Iacobum Ludolcum Strebaeum . . . elusdem Oratlonea I I pro A r l s t o t e l e

In Petrum Ramum

( 1 5 5 1 ) does not c o n t a i n e i t h e r of the two o r a t i o n s a g a i n s t Ramus which i t s t i t l e 15^7·

mentions.

Ramus, B r u t l n a e q u a e s t l o n e s in Oratorem

Ciceronls. 1547·

P e r i o n , Pro C i c e r o n i s Oratore c o n t r a

Petrum Ramum o r a t i o .

III.

Copies i n Pbn and MoSU.

THE RAMUS-GALLAND CURRICULUM DISPUTE, WITH COMMENTARY BY RABELAIS

(1551»

with some p r e p a r a t i o n

e a r l i e r ) . — T h i s d i s p u t e shows how f a r Ramus' a t t a c k s were f e l t not i n terms of

philosophical

i s s u e s but i n terms of curriculum d e s i g n .

It

is

only h e r e , a s an a d m i n i s t r a t i v e q u a r r e l , t h a t the Ramist l s e u e s c a t c h the eye of R a b e l a i s . P e t r i Rami v i t a

(1599),

Nancel,

pp. 66-67, n o t e s t h a t

Galland and Ramus had made up with one another b e f o r e Ramus' d e a t h . 15^2·

As r e c t o r of the U n i v e r s i t y of

Paris,

P i e r r e G a l l a n d goes on r e c o r d as opposing the s h o r t e n i n g of the philosophy c o u r s e .

See Du B o u l a y , H i s t o r l a CU-96]

Unl-

v e r s i t a t l s P a r l s l e n a l s ( 1 6 6 5 - 7 3 ) . V I , 381. 15^3.

Galland p u b l i s h e s , with commentary, an

e d i t i o n of Q j i l n t i l i a n , Oratorlorum lnatltutlonum l l b r l XII . . . . 151^9. tlllanum.

Copy in Cu.

Often r e p r i n t e d .

Ramus, Rhetorlcae d l a t i n c t l o n e s In QulnAn a t t a c k on Q u i n t l l i a n , with no d i r e c t r e f e r -

ence to contemporary coimnentators, but with many remarks on how to design a curriculum. 1551·

Ramus, Pro phllosophlca

Adacemlae d l a c l p l l n a o r a t i o ,

Parlslensla

n i l s work favors shortening

the a r t s course and making I t p o s s i b l e to o b t a i n the M.A. around the age o f fourteen or f i f t e e n · 1551·

Galland, Contra novam academlam P e t r i

Rami o r a t i o . . . .

Copy In Pbn.

This lj.to e d i t i o n was

followed the same year by an θνο e d i t i o n , a l s o published a t P a r i s , which i s quite the same but with the a l t e r e d t i t l e , Pro schola P a r l s l e n s l contra novam academlam P e t r i Rami o r a t i o . . . . and the t i t l e - p a g e motto added, "Aperit Ramum qui v e s t e l a t e b a t . " Lbm, MoSU, Ob, Pbn, Pv.

Copies I n CtY, Cu,

In t h i s defense o f the u n i v e r s i t y

curriculum, Galland remarlcs In passing ( f o l . 9) t h a t Ramus' books should be read f o r amusement " a s the vernacu l a r books of the r i d i c u l o u s

Pantagruel."

£497]

1552.

R a b e l a i s , in h i s new prologue to Book IV

of Pantagruel, eludes i d e n t i f i c a t i o n with e i t h e r s i d e , pokes fun at the two P i e r r e s , and proposes as the only p o s s i b l e solution to the quarrel the t o t a l " p e t r i f a c t i o n " of both of them. IV.

THE CHARPENTIER-OSSAT CONTROVERSY ON METHOD (1543-57 AND 1564-67.—This controversy i s intimately t i e d in with the development of Ramus' own stands and with h i s r e v i s i o n s of some of h i s works.

See a l s o

The Ramus-Charpentier l i t i g a t i o n over mathematics here below. 1543-47·

Ramus, D l a l e c t l c a e p a r t l t i o n e s

(Dlalectlcae

l n s t l t u t l o n e s ) and A r l s t o t e l i c a e animadversiones, the former, a f t e r two other r e v i s i o n s , appearing in 1547 ( t h i s time under Talon's name) as Institutlonum dialectlcarum libri tres. 1554·

See in Ramus s e c t i o n of the Inventory. Jacques Charpentier (Carpentarius),

Animadversiones in l l b r o s tre3 dialectlcarum institutlonum Petri Rami.

In t h i s work, in order to point out Ramus'

i n c o n s i s t e n c i e s , Charpentier r e f e r s by number to seven d i f f e r e n t e d i t i o n s of Ramus' work, c i t i n g some of Ramus' d i v i s i o n s of h i s material from most of these e d i t i o n s and thus making i t easy to I d e n t i f y them today.

Copy in Pm.

Pbn (microfilm in NNC) and Dt have copies of a 1555 [498]

edition, like the present 1554 c °Py

a

of

^2ibls·,

printed by Thomas Richardus at Paris--perhaps a reissue. 1555.

Ramus, Dlalectlque, further revising

Ramus' earlier stands.

See in the Ramus and Talon sec-

tion of the Inventory. 1556.

Ramus, Dlalecticae librl duo, Audomarl

Talael praelectlonibus llluatratl, embodying still further revisions which are explained at length by the praelectlones.

See in the Ramus section of the Inventory·

1557.

Ramus, Quod sit unlc^foctrlna lnetltu-

endae methodus.

The appearance of this monograph excerpt

is a tacit avowal that the whole Ramist issue is one of method.

More than that, it is the most explicit indica-

tion we have that the Renaissance attacks on scholastic method are themselves in great part the direct result of the central tradition of arts course scholasticism.

See

this work in the Ramus section of the Inventory. 156I4..

Charpentier, Disputatio de methodo, quod

unica non alt, contra Thessalum Academiae Pariaiensls methodlcum • . . selecta ex elusdem commentarlls in Alclnol Institutionen! ad doctrlnam Platonls. Dt and Pbn.

Copies in

Thessalus, whose case is detailed in Galen,

De methodo medendi

i

2, was one of the founders of the

medical sect of "Methodists" (methodlcl). [1*99]

He maintained

that medicine surpassed all the other arts and that he surpassed all other physicians.

The Theasalus of

this title is Raraus (fols. 4 ff·» and preface). 156I4..

Arnaud (later Cardinal) d'Ossat, Expoaitlo

In Dlaputatlonem Iacobl Carpentarll de methodo.

Copies In

MoSU and Pbn.

A defence of Ramus, often reprinted.

1561)..

Charpentier, Ad Expositionem Disputa-

tlonls contra Thessalum Ossatum Academlae Parlsiensla methodlcum responaio.

Copiea in Pbn.

Charpentier

here extenda the epithet Theaaalua to Oasat aa well. 1561)..

Oasat, Addltio ad Exposltlonem de methodo.

Copies in Pbn. By 1565.

Adrien TurnSbe (d. 1565), De metnodo

llbellus, first publiahed posthumously in 1600 in Paris. In this work, the by-product of the Ramus-Charpentier-Ossat controversies, TurnSbe, after expressing ironically his admiration for Ramus, goes on to attack circumstantially Ramus 1 position that there is only one method of teaching. Copies in Lbm, MoSU®, and Pbn.

This work has been trans-

lated into English, with parallel Latin text, by Frederick E. Brenk, S.J., in an unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Classical Languages, St. Louis University, 1956. V.

THE RAMUS-TURNEBΕ CONTROVERSY ON DIALECTIC AND PATE, 1550-51+.

See the Ramus section of the Inventory,

Audomarl Talaei Admonltlo ad Turnebum. VI. THE RAMUS-CHARPENTIER LITIGATION OVER MATHEMATICS AND THE "FRIPPELIPI^UE" LITERATURE (1566-60).-- A sequel [500]

to the Charpentier-Ossat controversy on method, i n which the philosophical i s s u e s are occluded by personal recriminations terminating i n f i n e

scurrility.

Nancel, P e t r i Rami v i t a (1599)» P · 63, notes t h a t Charpentier was j a i l e d once f o r p u b l i c l y c a l l i n g Ramus a Theodorus or Diagorus (the i m p l i c a t i o n being " a t h e i s t " i n the s i x t e e n t h - c e n t u r y meaning o f t h i s term). Only the c e n t r a l works published by Ramus and Charpentier, or more or l e s s in t h e i r names, are given h e r e .

For a s s o c i a t e d documents, see Waddington,

pp. l 6 8 f f , and Abel L e f r a n c , H l s t o l r e du College de France ( P a r i s , 1 8 9 3 ) , ΡΡ· 2 l 6 f f . This l i t i g a t i o n opens when Ramus, dean o f the regius p r o f e s s o r s , suggests to the new regiua p r o f e s sor o f mathematics, a S i c i l i a n named Dampestre Cosel, how he should conduct h i s l e c t u r e s — t h a t

is,

not i n the old fashion by explaining the Sphere o f Ioannis a Sacrobosco ( o r Holywood), b u t , by taking advantage of new mathematical i n t e r e s t s , by explaining E u c l i d ,

particularly

übe new r e g i u s p r o f e s s o r did

not follow Ramus' suggestion, and Ramus secured a decree from the P a r i s Parlement to the e f f e c t t h a t the new p r o f e s s o r of mathematics undergo a public examination i n mathematics.

Ramus wrote a t the same

time to the King, the Queen Mother, and members o f [501]

the P r i v y Council f o r b a c k i n g .

Soon Dampestre Cosel

not o n l y r e s i g n e d , but r e s i g n e d h i s c h a i r i n t o the hands of a s u c c e s s o r , d e s i g n a t e d by h i m s e l f ,

Jacques

Charpentier. C h a r p e n t i e r was a popular l e c t u r e r i n a r t s ,

but

had no p a r t i c u l a r knowledge of mathematics e x c e p t t h a t which could be deduced from the g e n e r a l p r i n c i p l e t h a t , mathematics being p a r t of

"philosophy,"

which was i n turn p a r t of the a r t s c o u r s e , masters of a r t s knew mathematics.

all

Hence, Ramus

t r a n s f e r r e d h i s a t t a c k to C h a r p e n t i e r .

The sequence

of the c e n t r a l p r i n t e d documents which r e s u l t e d

is

as f o l l o w s : 1566.

C h a r p e n t i e r , Orationea t r e s pro i u r e

p r o f e s s i o n ! 3 suae i n Senatu e x tempore h a b l t a e , lmportunas Rami a c t i o n e s .

contra

Copies i n Cu, Dt, NH, Pbn.

The o r a t i o n s are dated r e s p e c t i v e l y 7 i d · m a r t . , 5 i d m a r t . , and $ i d . m a r t . 1566.

Ramus, A c t i o n e s duae mathematicae.

the Ramus s e c t i o n of the I n v e n t o r y .

See

These are dated

r e s p e c t i v e l y March 11 and March 1 3 . 1566.

C h a r p e n t i e r , I a c o b l C a r p e n t a r i l Contra

lmportunas Rami a c t i o n e s ,

Senatus d e c r e t o nuper c o n f l r m a t l

o r a t i o , h a b l t a i n i t i o p r o f e s s i o n i s In a u d l t o r i o r e g i o [502]

anno 1566, calend. April.

Copies In Cu, Dt, NN, Pbn.

Under a t i t l e In which he gloats over the decision In his favor by the Paris Parlement, Charpentier cries that reglus professors should never be attacked, even were they completely i l l i t e r a t e , and even by other regius professors, for the reason that they are what they are— appointees of the king. Ramus, Prooemlum mathematician.

1567.

section of the Inventory.

See Ramus

Not expressly controversial

i t s e l f , this work i s included in this sequence because i t Is singled out for attack in the Phlllpplca secunda below. Charpentier, Admonitlo ad Thesaalum

1567.

Academiae Parisil3 methodicum de aliquot capltlbus Pyooemll mathematicl, quae contlnet eiusdem Carpentarll praelectlones in sphaeram.

Copies In Dt and Pbn.

Charpentier's lectures on mathematics after becoming regius professor in 1566, to which i s prefixed an attack on Ramus and his mathematical views. 1567·

[Jean Picard?

t i e r ' s friends.]

or another of Charpen-

In Petri Rami lnsolentlsslmum decan-

atum; graviaaim! culusdam oratorls phlllpplca prima e quatuordeclm.

Copy in Pbn.

At this stage, a l l serious

question of method i s submerged in pure s c u r r i l i t y . [503]

1567.

[Ramus?

friends·]

Or, much more probably one of his

Pour un liart d'antidote contre le frippelipique

du Bavart l'estourdy,

See in the Ramus section of the In-

ventory. 1567.

[Jean Picard?

friends.]

or another of Charpentier's

In Petri Rami insolent!salmum deoanatum

gravlssimi ciuisdam oratoris phillpplca secunda. Pbn.

Copy in

This second philippic is fortunately the last which

appeared of the fourteen threatened in the title above· 1567 (1568).

Ramus, La Remonstrance de Pierre de la

Ramrfe falte au Consell prlve [i.e., 1568].

. . . le 18 de Ianvler 1567

See in the Ramus and Talon section of the

Inventory.

VII.

THE RIOLAN CRITIQUE OP RAMUS (1568).--Jean Riolan the elder (l539?-l6o6) was a famous Paris physician, whose still more famous son, also named Jean (1580-1657), was William Harvey's most distinguished adversary.

Riolan's attack on Ramus consists of

one work only, and it elicited apparently no direct reply, but the attack itself grows out of a series of works by Riolan, apparently done while he was teaching as Master of Arts and studying medicine. The series i s worth studying, as it shows a contemporary critique of Ramism arising directly out of a positive and quite sensitively presented view [501;]

of philosophical development«

Riolan's Opera omnia

(Paris, l 6 l 0 ) f a i l s to include a l l the works c i t e d here. Some of Riolan's medical works feature the term bene in a way which suggests that the Ramist tradition d i r e c t l y or i n d i r e c t l y overtook him a f t e r a l l — f o r example h i s Ars bene medendl ( P a r i s , l 6 0 1 ) . 1562.

Riolan.

unlversam phllosophlam.

Brevls e t f a c l l i s lsagoge in Copy In Pbn.

This work discus-

ses P l a t o ' s confusion of d i a l e c t i c and metaphysics, Cicero's confusion of l o g i c and d i a l e c t i c , 1565«

Riolan.

etc.

Dlsputatlones duae, una de

orlglne, a l t e r a de incremento e t decremento phlloaophlae . . . ; qulbus a c c e s s i t Comparatlo d l a l e c t l c a e e t logicae ex Stolcorum, Platonlcorum, e t Perlpatetlcorum p l a c a t l a . Copy in Pbn.

Both parts are also printed in Riolan's

Propaedeumata phllosophica ( P a r i s , 1631)—copy in Pbn. The f i r s t of these works I s part of the massive l i t e r a t u r e concerned with time and h i s t o r i c a l epochs with which the l a t e r work of Giovanni B a t t l s t e Vlco connects but which i s now largely unknown because in Latin (and often by doctors of medicine rather than by full-time philosophers). 1568.

Riolan.

Ad Dlalecticam P [ e t r i j Rami una

ex praelectlonlbus Io[annls] Rlolanl eo docente raptlm 1505]

excrlpta.

Copy in Pbn.

Printed also in Riolan's Pro-

paedeumata phllosophlca (Paris, l631)--copy in Pbn.

A

telling critique, based on an historical approach to early philosophers.

VIII.

THE RAMUS-SCHEGK DISPUTE ON DIALECTIC AND METHOD, 1569.

See the Ramus section of the Inventory,

Petri Rami et Iacobi Schecii eplstolae.

This is

an important dispute, and the one directly responsible for Ramus' 1572 revision of his Dialectic, with its shifts in his treatment of "axioms" and method.

IX.

THE DIGBY-TEMPLE-PISCATOR-RICHARD HARVEY CONTROVERSY ON METHOD, 1579-83.--This first large-scale controversy after Ramus' death is coincident with the rooting of Ramiem in the English and Rhineland milieux*

There are frequent reprintings particu-

larly of Temple's and Piscator's contributions to the dispute—often in conjunction with an edition of Ramus' Dialectic (see the listings under this work in the Inventory). The controversy is wordy, rhetorical, and, between Digby and Temple, scurrilous—Digby is a Latin Tom Hashe, Temple a Latin Gabriel Harvey.

[506]

157

9.

London.

Everard Digby, Thaoria a n a l y t l c a

vlam ad monarchiam sclentlarum demonstrana . . . l l b r o 3 dlgeata.

Copies in Cu, Lbm, MoSUm, Ob.

in t r e s This i s

an attempt to c l a s s i f y the s c i e n c e s which i s in s p i r i t a t polar opposites to the Ramist m e n t a l i t y , s i n c e i t r e l i e s l a r g e l y on iconography, or exegesis o f p i c t o r i a l symbols, r a t h e r than on t a b l e s o f dichotomies.

It

is

noteworthy t t e t in t h i s p r e - G a l i l e a n , non-mechanized world, i t i s quite impossible to think o f s c i e n t i f i c

or

philosophical "systems"; the more archaic "way" ( v i a )

is

the favored concept. 1580,

London.

Digby, De d u p l i c l methodo l l b r i

duo, unlearn P [ e t r i ] Rami methodum r e f u t a n t e s Copies in Lbm, Ob, MoSU1".

. . . .

Reprinted: Francofurdi,

Ioannea

Wechelus, lf>09—copy in MBw. 1580,

London.

William Temple ( 1 5 5 5 - 1 6 2 7 ) , w r i t -

ing under the paeudonym Pranciscus Mildapettus Nevarrenus (Ramus' e a r l y studies a t Paris had been a t the College o f Navarre), Ad Everardum Dlgbelum Anglmn admonltlo de unlca P [ e t r l ] Rani methodo r e l e c t l s c e t e r i s r e t l n e n d l a . in Lbm; o f t e n reprinted (copy in MoSlP).

Copy

Dedicated to

P h i l i p Howard, Earl of Arundel. I58O,

London.

Mildapetti responslo.

Digby, Admonitlonl F r a n c l s c i Copies in Ob, MoSU111.

[507]

1580,

Frankfort-on-the-!*a i n .

Iohannes

P i s c a t o r , In P [ e t r i ] Rami Dialecticam anlmadverslones » . . .

Often r e p r i n t e d .

See in the Ramus and Talon sec-

t i o n of the Inventory under e d i t i o n s of D i a l e c t i c s . 1581,

London.

Temple, Pro Mlldapettl de unica

methodo defenslone contra Diplodophllum [ i . e . ,

Dlgby]

comnentatlo; hue a c c e s s i t nonullarum e t p h y s l c l s e t e t h l c l s e x p l l c a t l o una cum e p i s t o l a de Rami d l a l e c t i c a ad Ioannem Plscatorem Argentlnensem.

Here Temple continues

h i s f i g h t against Dlgby with one hand and engages P i s c a t o r with the o t h e r .

He acknowledges that he i s Mildapettus,

and dedicates t h i s work, too, to the Earl of Arundel. Copies in Cu, MH, Pm; often reprinted (copy inMoSU m ). 1582,

Frankfort.

Temple, E p i s t o l a de D i a l e c t i c s

P [ e t r l ] Rami ad Ioan[nem] Plscatorem una cum I o a n [ n l s ] P l s c a t o r i s ad 111am eplst[olam] responsione. Pbn, MoSIf.

So f a r as I can f i n d , t h i s i e the f i r s t

printing of Temple's E p i s t o l a . 1582,

Copies in

Prankfort.

Often r e p r i n t e d .

P i s c a t o r , Responslo ad

Gullelml Tempelll eplstolam, published with Temple's Epl s t o l a in the immediately foregoing work. Pbn, Mo SU01·

Copies in

P i s c a t o r ' s Responslo i s dated Moersae

(Mors), 6 o c t . 1581.

Often r e p r i n t e d .

[508]

1583,

London.

Richard Harvey, Ephemeron, alve

paean In gratiam perpurgatae reformataeque dialecticae, ad noblllaalmum Robertum Eaaexlae comltem, llluatrlsaimae apel Dominum.

Copiea in Ob and Pbn.

Thia work conaista

of fifteen dialoguea treating of the reform of dialectic, followed by an epilogue and a further "Elegia phlloaophlca" both in praiae of Ramua' dialectic. 1583,

Frankfort.

Piacator, Petri Rami Dlalac-

tlcae llbrl duo, Audomarl Talaei praelectlonibus lllustratl . . . emendati per Iohannem Piacatorem

....

See in the Ramua and Talon aection of the Inventory under Dlalectlca. 1^8ij.,

Cambridge.

Temple, Eplatolae de P[etrlJ

Rami Dlalectica contra Iohannis Piacatorla Reaponalonem defenaio, appearing in P[etrl] Rami Dlalectlcae librl duo, achollla Gulllelmi Tempelll Cantabrlgienaia llluatrati; qulbua acceaalt eodem auctore De Porphyrlanla Praedlcablllbua dlaputatlo, item Eplatolae de P[etrl] Rami Dlalectica contra Iohannia Piacatorla Reaponalonem defenaio . . . .

Apparently the flrat book printed by a bona fide

Cambridge Unlveraity printer. M0SU111).

Often reprinted (copy In

See In the Ramua and Talon aection of the Inven-

tory under Dlalectlca.

[509]

1595,

Hanau (near- P ' r a n k f o r t ) .

p i s c a t o r , In

P e t r i Rami D i a l e c t i c a e l i b r o s duos • . • s c h o l i a .

See i n

the Ramus s e c t i o n of the Inventory under D i a l e c t i c ^ . X.

THE RAM IST S, ANT I-RACISTS, AND SYNCRETISTS WHOSE WORKS FIGURE IN THE RAIilST CONTROVERSIES AND IN OTHER RAI: 1ST LITERATURE. The p r e c i s e r e l a t i o n s h i p of most of t h e s e a u t h o r s t o Ramus and Ramism can g e n e r a l l y be a s c e r t a i n e d through the other works i n the p r e s e n t I n v e n t o r y , or through Qng, Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue, and the b i b l i o g r a p h y t h e r e , or through t h e l a r g e r b i o g r a p h i c a l d i c t i o n a r i e s — m o s t v a l u a b l e here i s C h r i s t i a n G o t t l i e b J ö c h e r , Allgemeines Gelehrten-Lexicon (4 v o l s . ; 1750-51) with i t s supplements (7 V o l s . ; 1784-1897)—and t h e c a t a logues of t h e o l d e r European l i b r a r i e s .

I n t h e case of

English Ramists, t h e p r i n c i p a l work t o c o n s u l t i s Wilbur Samuel Howell, Logic and R h e t o r i c i n England, 1500-1700 ( P r i n c e t o n , New J e r s e y , 1956). This l i s t has been made a s complete a s p o s s i b l e , b u t more names could be adoed i n d e f i n i t e l y i f one wished t o extend the l i m i t s of what one means by a " s y n c r e t i s t " — everyone who today uses t h e n o t i o n of " l o g i c a l a n a l y s i s , " once a d i s t i n c t i v e Raraist s p e c i a l t y , has a l i t t l e of t h e Ramist in him.

I n g e n e r a l , t h i s l i s t includes only those

whoae w r i t i n g s involve them more or l e s s e x p l i c i t l y with Ramism when t h i s was a d i s t i n c t i v e l i v i n g f o r c e and i s s u e .

[510]

Those who simply differ with Hamus without entering more or less explicitly into controversy with Ramism, and major philosophical figures such as Leibnitz and Kant, who very likely felt the omnipresent influence of German Ramism but in an as yet undetermined way, are mostly not listed.

Similarly, printers and non-literary

figures such as James Stewart, Earl of Mar and Moray, or the Earl of Essex, and others like these trained in Ramism but with no Ramist or Ramist-colored works to their credit, are ordinarily not listed.

Waddington's

fantastic principle (in his Ramus, p. 392) that all antiAristotelians ipso facto qualify as Ramists is, of course, not honored here. Since the concept of "being" a Ramist or a non-Ramist is often a fugitive one, the following designations are to be understood as approximate only; R

Ramist, at least in general tendency

A

Anti-Rarr.ist, at least in general tendency

S

Semi-Ramist or syncretist of seme sort, that is, one professing to hold a combination of Aristotle's and Ramus' philosophy (dialectic or logic), or of Melanchthon·s and Ramus* (Hiilippo-Ramists) or otherwise showing Ramist affinities (as Professor Howell's "Uixts" and "Systematics")

[511]

(3)

Individual whose works show some Haraist a f f i n i t i e s , but rather l e s s than in the case of S Dates in parentheses indicate a date (generally

the e a r l i e s t I have) of publication o f a work concerned with Ramism by the individual in question or of a work or document indicating his connection with Raraisra.

Such dates are supplied only for some

of those whose connection with hamlsm or whose e n t i r e careers are r a t h e r obscure. Acontius

see Contio

Aelhuysen (Aalhuysen, Alhuysen) Jan van f l . I66I4 (16614.) Aguin (Aguinus), Antoine

b. c a . 1536?

(15W)

~

Aldrich, Henry

R

lt47~1710

(S)

Alexander (Alexandre), Bartholomaeus Alhuysen

R

(15W*)

R

see Aelhuysen

A l s i n o i s , l e Comte d·

see Denisot

Aisted (Aletedt, A l s t e d l u s ) , Johann Heinrich 1588-1658

R

Althusius (Althaus, Althusen), Johann Ames (Amesius), William

1576-1633

Aretius (Marti), Benedictus

1505-7I4.

Armlnius (Hermanns), Jacob

1560-1609

Arnauld, Antoine

1557?-1638

1612-94 [512]

R R

(1571)

S? s

A

(S)

Arthus

(Arthusius), Gothardus

1570-ca. 1630

(1601;)

S

Aschara, Roger

1515-60

(S)

Asseline, Eustache iSustachius a Saneto Paulo) (in religion, fl. 1611-34 (164Ö)

(S)

Bacon, Francis, Baron Verulam and Viscount St. Albans

1561-1621

Balf, Antoine de

A

1532-U9

(S)?

Ballerius, Ambrosius

b. ca. 1535?

Ballerius, Franciscus

b. ca. 1536?

Banosius (1576)(de Banos), Theophilus Barnsus (Barnes?), Ioannes Barton, John

fl.

Baxter, Nathaniel

Belloni

1634

1520-77

Bergeron

R? R

(15^5)

R

(I636)

R

1542-1621

A?

(1555)

(Bellonius), Jean

R R

(1634)

d. 1632

Berckringer, Daniel

U5M*)

(15^4)

Bellarmine, Robert Cardinal Belleau, Remi

R

(Th6ophile)

fl. 1606

Bedwell, William

U54Ö)

(S)?

d. 1623

R?

d. I667

S? A

(Bergeronius, Bergeronus), Nicolas

fl. 1577-00

(1577)

Berstorpius, Chunradus

R (1620)

R

Beuraler (Beumlerus, Beumlerus Tigurinus), Marcus 15Ö0-1611 (159Ö)

R

Beurhaus (Beurhusius), Friedrich (15Ö1)

Ρ

Beza, Theodor

1519-1605

£5133

(1569)

1536-1609

A

Bilaten (Bilstenlus), Johann (1596)

fl. 1596 S

Bisterfeld (Biesterfeld, Blsterfeldlus), Johann Heinrich Blount, Thomas

d. 1655

1618-79

Blundevllle, Thomas Bodln, Jean

Β (S)

fl. 1561-99

A

1520-96

Bomont, Jean de

(3)

fl. 1544

(151+4)

Botvldus (Bothvldus), Iohannes

d. 16-35

(1613)

R

Boucher, Nicolas

1528-93

(1562)

Brederode Pleter Cornells van fl. ca.(Brederodius), 1590 Breithaupt (Breithauptlue), Christianus 1689-1749 (1712) Brendel (Brendellus), Zacharlas

R S

A

Brerewood (Bryervood), Edward

15657-1613

Bressleu (Bresslue), Maurice

fl. 1576-88

(1576)

A

R

Briggs, Henry

1561-1630

R

see Sanchez

Broscius, I.

fl. 1638

Brown, Robert

15507-1633

Bru&s, Guy de

fl. 1555-57

Bruno, Giordano Bryerwood

A

1553-1626

(1580)

Brocense

R

(1652)

A R

(1555)

1548-1600

(S)? A A

see Brerewood

Buchanan, George

1506-82 (514)

(1569?)

R?

Bullinger ( B u l l i n g e r u s ) , Heinrich

1501^-75

(157D

Buraann (Bumannus), Karl (1605)

fl.

1598-1610

Burgersdijk ( B u r g e r s d i c i u s ) , Eranco (Franconus) 1590-1636

S? R (S)

Burkius (Burk? Burke?), Leonardus (1616,

1631)

R?

Burnath, G i l b e r t

(16I4.9)

R?

Buecher (Büschems), Heizo B u t l e r , Charles (Charls)

f l . 1590 d. I6I4.7

Calovius (Kalau), Abraham (1509-6^)

Carpentarius

see Charpentier

Carpenter, Nathaniel Case, John

R

1612-86

Calvin, Jean

A (S)?

1589-1628?

d. 1600

R

3

(1598)

Casmann (Casmannus), Otto

S?

d. 1607

S

Cassandre (Cassander), Francois

d. 1693

A?

Castelnau, Michel de

(1581)

R

1520-92

Cayet, Pierre-Victor-Palma

1525-1610

Chaderton ( C h a t t e r t o n ) , Laurence Chamberhouse

15367-1614.0

R

see Docwra

Chappell, William

1582-I6I4.9

S

Charpentier (Carpentarius), Jacques Choirus

3?

(Schneeberger), Petrus

152I4.-7i|. 1535-1619

Chytraeus (Kochhaff, Kochhafe), David 1531-1600 [515]

A R Η

Clarke, John

fl. 1628

Clarke, John

fl. I636

A (1636)

Combach (Corabachius), Johann Coraenius

R

1585-1651

S?

see Komensky

Congregation of the Oratory, French see Oratorlans Contlo (Acontlus), Giacomo Cosel

d. ca. 1565

3?

see Dampestre Cosel

Cossart (Cossartlus), Gabriel (1651) Cragius

1615-74 A

see Krag

Cramer, Andreas

1582-1640

Cramer, Christopher Cramer, Johann

(1618)

fl. 1600

S

(1600)

S

1530-1602

Crug (Crugius), Nicolaus Dambraneus, Claudius

1575-1648

b. ca. 1535?

Dampestre Cosel, Jean Denis, Pierre

R

fl. 1566

1497-1577

(1606)

S?

(1548)

R

(1566)

(1567)

A A

Dannhauer (Dannhauerus), Johann Konrad 1603-66 Day, Angell

(1740)

3

fl. 1586

A

Deckher (Deckherus), Conrad Degen

d. 1620

(1620)

S?

see Schegk

Denisot, Nicolas

1515-59

Descartes, Ren6

1596-1650

Desmasures (1555) (des Mazures), Louis

[516]

(1555)

(3)? (3)

1510-60

(S)?

Diest, Heinrich

1595-1673

S

Dietrich (Dieterich, Dietericus, Theodoricus) Conrad 1575-1639

S

Digby (Digbeius—called "Diplodophilus," i.e., "Double-Method-Lover" by William Temple), Everard fl. 1590 (1580)

A

Diplodophilus

see Digby

Docura de Chatnberhouse

see Docwra

Docwra (Dowkra, Dockwra, Dockquerye, Docura) of Chamberhouse, Edmund (Edmundus) (1571»·) Dorat, Jean

R* 1508-88

A

Down ham (Downame, Dounamus), George d. 163^4Du Beilay, Joachim 1522-60 (1555) Dubreuil (Dubrelliua), Claude (151+8)

b. ca. 1536? —

R (S)? R

Duchesne (& Quercu), L6ger (Ludovicus or Leodegarius) Dudicius, Andreas

d. 1588

A

(1580)

R

Dugard (Du-Gard, Dugardus), William Du Mesnil (Menilius), Baptiste

1606-82

d. 1569

Du Monstier Moustier), Francois 1617-90 (Du(1651) * Du Moustier Dyer, Edward

R S? R

see Du Monstier d. 1607

(ca. 1580)

3?

Ebel (Ebelius), Kaspar

1595-1661+

(161+0)

Elizabeth I of England

1533-1603

(1585)

Enyedi, Caspar R.

(1658)

[517]

3 (a)? R

Krythropel (Krythropilus, Rothuet), Rupert 1556-1626

(1588)

R

Episcopius, Eusebius

(1569)

Eustachius & Saneto Paulo Pabricius

R

see Asseline

see also LefSvre

F a b r i c l u s , Oeorgius Andreas Parnaby, Thomas

1589-161+5

(1621;)

1575?-161|·7

Page, Robert

A

(1632)

S (S) R

Ffinelon, Francois de Salignac de La Mothe 1651-1715

A?

Fenner, Dudley

l558?-87

F e r n e l , Jean

R

11*97-1558

Peugueray, Francois

R?

(1575)

Flaciua ( F l a c i u s I l l y r i c u s ) ,

S Matthias

(1520-75) Poclin(us)

S? see Fouquelin

Portraann Johann 1576-1651+ (1600)(Portmannue), Fouquelin (Paquelin, P o c l i n , Fbquelinus), Antoine

c a . 15 31+'-after 1559

Fox (Poxius) Fraunce, Abraham

(1555)

(S) R

see Morzillo f l . 1587-1633

(1568)

R

Freige ( F r e i g , Frey, F r e i g i u s ) , Johann Thomas 151+3-83

R

Friese ( F r i s i u s ) , Johann Priese ( F r i s i u s ) , Paul

1505-65 f l . 1590

P r i s c(1590) h l i n ( F r i s c h l i n u s ) , Nicodemus [518]

(1561)

S?

(1590)

R

151+7-90

A

rt»ialU3

see Frieae

Pulke, William

see Gemma

1538-89

(1572)

Galland (Gallandiua), Pierre Gaaaendi, Pierre

R?

1510-59

A

1592-1665

(S)

Gemma (Gemma Friaiua), Ranier

1508-55

S?

G6n6brard, Gilbert

(1577)

A

1537-97

Gerardua "Paator Antonianua" Gerhard, Johann

Gocleniua

R

1582-1637

Gil, Alexander, the elder Glanvill, Joseph

(1577)

R? 1564-1635

1636-80

R? A

(3)

see Gockel

Gäckel (Gocleniua), Rudolphua, the elder 1547-1628

R

Gockel (Gocleniua), Rudolph, the younger 1579-1621

(S)?

Gorria (Goraeua), Jean dea Gothofredua

1505-77

aee Gottfried

Gottfried (Gothofredua), Haloinua

d. 1609

(1602) Gouge, William

3

1578-1653

Gouveia (Goveanua), Antonio de Granger, Thomaa Greaves, Paul Greene, Robert Greenwood, P.

R?

b. 1578 fl. 1588-1616 15607-92 (15914.)

Grothein (Grotheinua), Andreaa [519]

(1596) ca. 1505-66

r A r R7 A h?

„

Grouchy (Gruchius), Nioolaus

ca. 1520-72

(1567) Gruchiua

A see Grouchy

Gualperlus (Gualtperlus), Otto

1546-1624

(1600)

S

Gualter(us)

see Walther

Gualtperlus

see Gualperlus

Guferin (Guerinus), Jean b. ~ ca. 3536? (15W) Guise, Charles, Cardinal of Guise (earlier Cardinal of Lorraine) Gutberleth, Heinrich

Hachting, Johann Hall, Thomas

1524-74

1572-1635

Guymara de Ferrara, A.

R R

(1614)

fl. 1564

R

(1564)

A

fl. 162^-30

R

1610-65

S?

Hal1ervord (Hallervordius Westphallus), Hermann fl. 1608

A?

Hallier, Ρτβηξοίβ

1595-1659

Hamilton, Patrick

1504?-2Ö

(1630)

Harrison, Robert

3 R?

Hamlin (Hamlinus), Guy (Aegidius)

(1574)

fl. 1663

Hartmann, Ioannes

(1599)

S? R?

1545?-85

Hart, John, D. D.

3?

S

(1663)

(3)? R

Harvey (Harvelus), Gabriel

1545?-1630

R

Harvey (Harveius), Richard

d. 1623

R

HasenmUller (1615) (Hasenmullerue), Sophonias Heereboord, Adrian

1614-59

[520]

S?

R? S

Heminginus, Nicolaus Hendricxz, Dirck Herbst

A

(1567) (1622)

R

see Oporln

Hesselbein ( H e a s e l b e i n i u s ) , Johann f l . 1606-13 Hobbea, Thomas

(1606)

3

1568-1679

(3)

Hofmann (Hoftnannua), Denial

1536-1621

S?

Hood, Thomas

(1590)

R

f l . 1502-98

Hooker, Richard

1554?-1600

Home (Horn), Thomas Hoakyns, John

A

1610-54

R

1566-1638

(3)

Hotmanη (Hotnanus, Hotomannus), Franqola 152^-90

R?

Hubmeier (Hubmeierua), Hippolytua (1607)

3

Hunnaeua, Augustinus

1521-77

I a c o t l u s , Desideriua

f l . c a . 1579

Illyrlcus

d . 1637 3 (1579)

S?

see Flacius

I o v l l l a e u s , Carolus

(15Ö0)

R?

James I of England

1566-1625

3

Jesuits

(Society of J e s u s )

A or (3)?

Jodelle, ttienne

1532-73

Η

Jonaon, Benjamin

1573?-1637

(S)y

Kalau

see Calovius

Keckermann (Keckermannus), Bartholomew 1571-1608 Kempe, William

f l . 1590 [521]

(1568)

3 r

Kennedy, Herbert Kirkson

fl. 1694

(1694)

(3)

see Kirkton

Kirkton (Kirkson), Thomas Kochhafe

see Chytraeus

Kochhaff

see Chytraeus

fl. 1643-1+4

Komensky (Coraenius), Jan Amos Krag (Cragius), Anders

R

1592-1670

1556-1600

(1583)

(S) R

LambIn (Lambinus), Denis (Dionysius) 1516-72

3?

Lampe, Bernard Lamy, Bernard

(I636)

R

1640-1715

(3)

1518-81

R?

Languet, Hubert

taslckl (Laslcius), Johannes

fl. 1567-99

(ca. 1568)

R?

Launcelot, Dom Claude

Lauredano

1615-95

(S)

see Loredano

Le Breton, Joachim

1716-1819

Lefivre (Fabricius), Francois

(1788) 1524-73

Lenz, Christian Friedrich 1692-1757 Le Pecheur, Jean Waddington 's name for Johann Plscator, q.v. Lever, Ralph Libau

(3) (1713)

d. 1585

(3)?

A

(Libavius) Andreas

ca. 1550-1616

Llebler (Lieblerus), George

S

I52k-l600

(1594)

A

Lipsius (Lips), Iustus (Joest) Locke, John

(S)?

1632-1704

[522]

1547-1606

A (S)

Loisel ( O i s e l , Oiselua) Antoine Loredano (Lauredano), Bernardo Lorraine

fl.

see Guise

Lucius (Lus), Ludwig

1577-161+2

Machilmane

see M'Kilwein

Macllmaine

see M'Kilwein

Makilmain

(1606)

see M'Kilwein

Makilmenaeus

see M'Kilwein

Makylmenaeus

see M'Kilwein

Marlowe, Christopher Marti

1536-1617

1561+-93

see A r e t i u s

Martin (Martinus, Martinus of Dunkeld), James f l . 1577. d· *>y 15614. Martini (Martinus, Martinus of Antwerp), Cornelius 1568-1621 Martini (Martini Navarrus), P e t r u s (15Ö9) Martinus, Iosephus

d . 159k

(1612)

M a r t o n f a l v i , Georgius T.

f l . 1658-81

Masparaut (Masparautius), P i e r r e (1548)

(1658)

b . e a . 1535? ~

Mather, Cotton Mather, I n c r e a s e Matthiae ( M a t t h i a s ) , C h r i s t i a n u a (1611+) MayAns y SiscAr, Gregorio

15ÖL.-1656 ^

1699-1781

Meissonerius (Meissonerius Lausanensis, Meissonerius Oeneyensis, M e i s s o n i e r ) , FV&nciacus (1580)

[523]

(177k)

Melanchthon Melville

(Schwärtzerd), Philip

(Melvinus, etc.), Andrew

Menilius

1554-16^?

aee Du Mesnil

Mersenne, Marin

15ÖÖ-164Ö

(161+4)

Meuderlin

(Meuderllnus), Petrus

Meusel

see Musculus

Meusslin

see Musculus

Mignault

(Minos), Claude

Mildapettus

1582-1651

ca. 1536-1606

see Temple

Milton, John Minos

1497-1560

1608-74

see Mignault

Mirandola (Mirandulanus), Bernardus della

(1567) M ^ i l w e i n (Machilmane, Macllmaine, Makilraain, Makilmenaeus, Makylmenaeus), Roland (Rollo,

Rolandus) Moezel

i'l. 1569-74

(1574)

see Musculus

Montaureus (Montaureonus, de Mondorfe), Petrus d. 1571 (1567) Montagu, Richard

1577-1641

Montrisius (de Montrif? Montresor? Montrose?), Gilbert (1580) Morzillo (Foxius Morzilli), Sebastianus Ftox ca. 1523-60 (1567) Munday (Mundy), Anthony Müssiin

1553-1633

see Musculus

Musculus (Meusel, Meusslin, Moezel, Müsslin),

Wolfgang

1497-1563

E524]

Nadanyi, Iohannes

fl. 1656-1666

Nancel (Nancellus), Nicolas de Nashe, Thomas

(1658) 1539-1610

1567-1601

Navarrenus

see Temple

Neander (Neander Bergensis), Conradua fl. 156U-95 (1591) Neubecker, Conrad

(1590)

Nevlll, Edward

(1584)

Newall, Ifartln

fl. 1674

Newton, John

(1674)

1622-7«

Nicephorus, Hermannus (1600) Nicole, Pierre

ca. 1555-1625

1625 or 1628-95

Nolllus, Heinrich

fl. 1601+

Nothold (Notholdus), Anton (1596)

1569-1650

Nunez (Nunnez, Nunneelua—in Uaddington, pp. 215, 393* Nunlus), Petrus Ioannes d. 1600 (1774) Nunlus

see Nunes

Nunneelua

see Nunez

Obsopaeus

see Opsopaeus

Olsel(us)

see Loieel

Oltingerus, Ioannes Martlnus

(1583)

Oporin (Oporinus, Herbst), Iohannes 1507-68 (1553) Opslmathes, Iohannes

(1602)

Opsopaeus (Obsopaeus) Ioannes (1582) 1525]

1556-96

Oratoriana Onsat

(French Congregation of the Oratory)

S

(Ossatus), Arnaud d' (later Cardinal)

1536-1604

R

Parnaaaua plays' author Pasquier, Estienne

(1597)

1529-1615

A (1555)

(S)?

Pelletler (Pelletier du Mana, Pelletarius), Jacques

1517-02

Pemble, William Pfena, Jean

(1555)

3?

1592?-1623

A

1531-57

(S) R

Perion (Perionius, Perionus), Joachim de 1^99-1559

(1514-3)

Perkins, William

A

1558-1602

(1615)

Pfaffrad (Pfaffradius), Caspar (1597) Phillips, Edward Picard, Jean

1630-96?

d. 1617

1562-1622 (1656)

(1567)

R R A

Plot, Lazarus fl. 1596 Piscator (Piscator Argentinensis, Piscator Herbornensis, Piscator "Wittenbergensis"), Johann 1546-1625 PlSiade Poetevin

S

A S (S)

see Poitevin

Poisson, Pierre, Sieur de la Bodiniere fl. 1583

(1583)

R

Poitevin (Poetevin, Potevinus), I.

(1589)

Polanus (Polanus von Polansdorf), Amandus 1561-1610 Pontanus (Sparunüller), Jacob 1542-1626 (1600)

[526]

R? S A?

Pontus de Thiard (Tyard)

see Thiard

Port-Royalists

A

Portus de Candia, Franciscus Potevlnus

1511-01

S?

see Poitevin

Prideaux, John

1578-1650

S

Prosch (Proscius), Ioannes Puttenham, George Quentin(us) Quercu

(S)

fl. 1652

(1652)

d. 1590

A

A (S)

see Quillt in

see Duchesne

Quintin fluentId, Quintinus, Quintinus Heduus), Jean

1500-61

Rabelais, Francois

R

betw. 11^.93 and 1500-1553

Rainolde (Reynolds), Richard

d. 1606

Rainolds (Rainoldus), John

S?

Ram (Ramus, Tack), Johann Recorde, Robert Redinger, Thomas Regius, Iohannes

1535-70

(3)?

ca. 1510-58

(S)?

(1561) 1567-1605

Reiskius (Reiske), Iohannes

(1583)

R? A

161*1-1701

(ca. 1690)

S

Rennemann (Rennemannus), Henning

1567-1646

R

see Rainolde

Richardson, Alexander

fl. 1629 (1629)

Richer (Richerius), Edmond (1605) Rieaner

(S)?

15^9-1607

(1575)

Reynolds

A

see Risner [5273

1559-1631

R {s)?

Rigerua (Rigerus Northusanus), Ioannea

(1588)

S

Riolan (Rlolanus), Jean, the elder 1539-1606 Rianer (Relaner, Risnerus),

d. 1580

Fridericus

(1606)

R

Rodlng (Rodlngus), Gullhelmua Rögner, Christian Gottlieb Ronaard, Pierre de

1549-1603 fl. 1715

1524-85

Rosa (Roa), Alexander Rothuet

A

(1715)

(1555)

(3)? (3)

1591-1651;

R

see Erythropel

Rutlmeier (Rutlmeirus), Marcua

fl. 1617

(1617)

R

Ryff, Peter

1552-1629

Sabellus, Ioannes

R

(1547)

Sabetitius, Samuel

R?

(1617)

R

Salignac (Salignacue), Bernard de (1580) Salignac

R

(Sallgnacua), Jean de

fl. 1580

R

fl. 1543-64

(1543)

A

Salzhueberus, Oeorgiua

(1590)

A

Sanchez de laa Brozaa (Sanctlus Brocensis, "El Brocenae"), Francisco Sanctlus

1533-1601

R

aee Sanchez

Sanderson, John Sanderson, Robert Scaliger, Joseph

d. 1602

S

1587-1663

(S)

1540-1609

Scaliger, Juliua Caesar

1484-1558 [528]

A (1567)

A

Scallaius, Arturus Scharff, Johann

b. ca. 1536?

(1548)

1595-1660

R A

Schegk (Schecius, Schegklus; original name Jacob Degen), Jacob

A

Scheibler, Christoph

1589-1653

(1631)

(S)?

Schenkel (Schenkelius), Lambert Thomas (1619)

(S)

Scherbius, Philippus Schneeberger

d. 1605

(1595)

A

(1586, 1599)

R

see Chiorus

Schöner (Schonerus), Lazarus Schoock, Martin

1614-69

3

Schor (Sohorus), Heinrich

(1572)

Schräm (Schramus), David

1559-1615

Schryver

R (1589)

see Scrlbonius

Schütze, Heinrich Karl Schwallenberg, Otto Schwärtzerd

1700-81

(1742)

fl. 1584

(S) R

see Melanchthon

Scrlbonius (Scrlbonius Guilielmus AdolphusHarpurgensis, fl. 1566 Schryver), Sepulveda, Juan Gines de (Goneslus) 1490-1573

(1567) 1540-98

14987-1567

Severinus, Petrus

b. ca. 1535?

1564-1616

[529]

R? (S)?

1542-1602

Sevin(1548) (Sevlnus), Pranjols Shakespeare, William

R A

Serres (Serranus), Jean de Seton, John

R

(S)? R (S)

Sharp, James

1613-79

Sidney, Sir Philip

R

1554-86

Simler (Simlerus), Ioaias Simoni (Simonius), Simon

(S) 1530-76

fl. 1565-70

Sluter (Sluterus), Severinus

R? (1571)

1571-1648

R? R

Smith, John, of Montagu Close, Southwark fl. 3656

(1656)

Smith, Samuel

S

1587-1620

S

Snel 15^6-1613 van Roijen (Snellius), Rudolphus

R

Snel van Roijen (Snellius), Willebrord 1581-1626

R

Society of Jesus

see Jesuits

Sonleutner Michael (Sonleuter, (1584) Sonleutnerus),

S

Sophocardius (Wishart? Wisehart?), Ioannes fl. 1674 Spanmüller

R see Pontanus

Spencer, Thomas

fl. 1628

(1628)

Spenser, Edmund 1552-99 Spieghel, Hendrik Laurenszoon (1585) Spondi (Spondanus), Henri de

S (S)

15U9-1612 R 1568-I6I4.3

(1651)

A

Stadius, Ioannes

d. 1579

Stegerus, Tobias

(1591)

(1581)

R R

Stellingwerf (Stellingwervius), Petrus Talpa fl. 1563-1608

R

Sturm (Sturmius), Johann

s

[530]

1507-09

Sulcer (Sulcerus), Simon

1508-Ö5

Sylbergius, Eriderlcus Tack

(1569)

(1600)

A R

see Ram

Talaeus

see Talon

Talon (Talaeus), Omer (Audomarus) e a . 1510-62

R

Temple (Tempellus, "Franclacus Mildapettua Navarrenus*), William ( l a t e r S i r William), the elder 1555-1627

R

T e t s i , Nicolaus I .

R

Theodoricus

(1656)

see Dietrich

Thevininus, Pantaleon

f l . 1578

Thlard (Tyard), Pontus de

1521-1605

Thou (Thuanuo), Christophe de

1508-82

Thou (Thuanus), Jacques Auguste Thuanus

R

1553-1617

(3)ϊ S? S?

see Hiou

Tidicaus, Franz

151+4-1617

Tirapler (Timplerus), Clemens Tovey, Nathaniel

(1581)

R

f l . 1604

(S)

f l . 1626

Tremellius, Immanuelus

R?

1510-80

(1570)

R?

T r e u t l e r ( T r e u t l e r u s ) , Jerome (Hieronymus) 1565-1607

R

Turnebe (Turnebus), Adrien

A

1512-65

Turretin (Turretinus), Pranciscus Ursin (Ursinus), Ouilielmus (1615) Ursin (Ursinus), Zacharias

[531]

I623-87

f l . 1615 1534-83

s? R a

Urstisius (Wurstisius, Wursteisen), Christopherus 15U4-0& (1596)

Η

Valerius (Valerius Ultraiectinus, Wouters, Waltheri, Gualtheri), Cornelius A?

1512-57

Veno, Hendrick de Verulam

fl. 1602-13

Κ

see Bacon

Vessodus fl. oa. 1575 (1575 in Freige, P. Rami vita, and 15Ö3 in R. Harvey, Ephemeron...•) Vicars, Thomas

fl. 1607-1|1

Vicomercato, Francesco

Villemandy, Pierre de

(S) A

1529-1600

R?

(1675)

(S)?

1647-17H+

Waldegrave, Robert Walker, Obadiah

A

1567

Vigel (Vigelius), Nicolaus

Voetius, Johann

R

S

155^7-160^ 1616-99

R A

(S)

irfalther (Gualter, Gualterus), Rodolphus 1519-66 Ward, Seth Wasserleider

(1572)

S?

1617-09

(S)?

(Waaserleider Kulhemius,

Wasserleiter), Goswin Webster, John

1610-82

Wichel (Wechelus), AndrS Wichel (Wechelus), Chretien Weisiger, J. D.

fl. 1507

R R

ca. 1510-61 d. 155X4.

(1713)

Wendelin (Wendelinus), Marcus Friedrich 1584-1652

[532]

(1507)

R R? (S)? S

Wörenberg, Jacob

fl. 1613-1+2

Wesenbeck, Matthäus Wesley, John

Wilson, Thomas

Wishart

1531-86

R? R

1703-91

Willlas, Iohannes

Wisehart

(l6l3)

(S)

fl. l6l9-30

(l6l9,l625)

1525?-8l

R A

see Sophocardius see Sophocardius

Wotton, Anthony Wotton, Samuel

I56I-I626 fl. 1626

Wursteisen

see Urstisius

V/urstisius

see Urstisius

Zabarella, Iacopo

S (1626)

1553-89

Zwinger (Zwingerus), Theodor

[533]

S

(S)? 1533-88

R

AGRICOLA CHECK LIST A Short-Title Check List of Some Printed Editions and of Some Printed Compendia of Rudolph Agricola's Dialectical Invention (De Inventlone Dlalectica) This check list is presented for elementary documentary purposes as fuller than any other similar study in print, but it does not at all represent the same exhaustive study as the Ramus and Talon Inventory, and can doubtless be much enlarged. Agricola died in lij.85, and the Dialectical Invention (De inventione dlalectica), more or less finished by 1^79» apparently circulated in manuscript for decades before the first printed editions appeared.

There are divergencies in the printed

texts deriving apparently from different manuscripts— perhaps from Agricola's own autographs, for the manuscripts have never been studied or even located. My examination of copies has made it clear that there are two chief textual traditions in the printed editions of the Dialectical Invention, that perpetuated in the edition with Phrissemius' lectures or commentary, with Liber II in 22 chapters, and that perpetuated in the edition prepared by Alard of Amsterdam purportedly from Agricola's own autograph manuscript, with Liber II in 30 chapters.

1531)-]

There is considerable

variation between the texts, although the difference in chapter numbering itself is due not to the dropping of chapters but to the gathering of two or m o r e chapters into one (iv is equivalent to iv and ν; ν to vl and vii; χ to xii and xili; xii to xv and xvi; xiv to xvii, xviii, xix, and xx; xvi to xxii and xxiii).

One is tempted to divide all the editions

here into a Text A and a Text Β descended respectively from PhriBsemius, and Alard*s texts» but without a more complete collation of the editions than I have been able to make« it would appear «

rather rash to do this·

I have therefore refrained

from positively identifying the contents of any edition with that of another and have simply reported the number of chapters in the various editions which I have examined more closely· Ήιβ oonmentarles of Alard of Amsterdam« of Phrlssemius, and of others are filled with bracketed outlines» and it is apparently the authors of these commentaries who divide Agricola's text into chapters with titles and numbers.

Thus bracketed tables*

the use of titles as labels» and heavy reliance on numeration to impose a kind of order are associated with one another in the pre-Ramist tradition here and bear evident relationship to the skills in control-

[5353

ling and organizing words spatially which were being developed in connection with the new art of printing. Agricola's work thus not only appears and gains currency in the milieu which had given rise to printing, but comes into Ramus' hands further conditioned by Agricola's editors along the viaualist lines favored by printing. Editors both enlarge on and contract Agricola's Dialectical Invention.

Phrissemlus' commen-

tary is roughly the length of Agricola's text itself.

The epitome prepared by Bartholomew Latomus

(Le Masson or Steinmetz), as Latomus explains in his letter to the rector of the College of Sainte Barbe, cal. oct. 1533 (ed. Gryphius, lS3k)» is useful because Agricola is too full (uberlus) to be got through in a hurry. It will be observed here that over forty editions of Agricola's Dialectical Invention precede Ramus' work of 15U-3-55» which comes into existence when the Dialectical Invention ceases to be a Rhineland specialty and moves into the scholastic milieu at Paris.

Once Ramus lays hold of Agricola, he puts

an end to the Dutchman's popularity and supercedes him.

In a somewhat similar way, Ramus was later to

be relegated to oblivion by Descartes. [536]

E d i t i o n s of Agricola seem to be a l l Continental.

Agricolan d i a l e c t i c made i t s way to the

B r i t i s h I s l e s as a s s i m i l a t e d by the post-Agricolan generation of humanists. Bie same symbols are used as i n the Ramus and Talon Inventory» with t h i s a d d i t i o n : t

Entry from the sketchy bibliography in T. P. T e s s l i n g , V i t a e t merita Rudolphl Agrlcolae (Groningen, 1 8 3 0 ) , u n v e r i f i e d elsewhere, and r a t h e r u n l i k e l y .

I t la particularly

unlikely t h a t the f i r s t two l i s t i n g s h e r · date before 1515» although I have not been able to rule out the p o s s i b i l i t y a b s o l u t e l y . They do not occur in Wouter N i j h o f f and M· E . Kronenberg, Neederlandsche Bibliographie van 1500 t o t 15^0 ( 1 s-Gravenhage: Martinus N i j h o f f , 1919 f f . ;

vols.)

The D i a l e c t i c a l

Invention does not occur i n A g r i c o l a ' s Nonnulla opuscula ( 1 5 1 1 ) , nor in any o t h e r c o l l e c t i o n of h i s individual works ( t h e r e i s no complete c o l l e c t i o n ) . Although A g r i c o l a ' s anonymous influence i s f e l t on a l l s i d e s , I know of no anonymous e d i t i o n of the D i a l e c t i c a l Invention, so t h a t a l l the e d i t i o n s l i s t e d can be understood to have h i s name on the title-page. [5371

i De Inventions d i a l e c t i c a e l i b r i Daventriae: Iacobus Le Febre,

tres.

[date?]

t

ii De inventione d i a l e c t i c a l l b r i t r e s , cum s c h o l i i e Ioannia Matthaei Phrissemii. Alopeclu3,

[date?]

Lovaniae: Hieron[ymus]

t

Iii Rodolphi Agricolae Phrysii D i a l e c t i c a

[title

re-

peated at beginning of Liber I aa De inventione dialectica l i b r i t r e s ] .

L o v a n i i : Theodoricus

Martinua Alustensis, 1515» p r i d . i d . i a n .

fol.

Λ-C 6 , l A , D-P 6 , G 8 . a-b 6 , c 3 , d^. Hotea:

The booka are not divided into chapters,

but the paragrapha (unnumbered) in Liber I 28; in I I , 15 (beginning with i n i t i a l s » beginning with the aign a ) ;

in I I I , l6

total

plua 3 more (beginning

with i n i t i a l s , plua 3 more beginning with the aign a). A f t e r Liber I , a table (repeated in aubaequent e d i t i o n s ) i s given comparing the l i s t s of l o c i proposed variously by A g r i c o l a , Cicero, and Theraistius.

[538]

Copies:

Lbm

Ob

Psc

iv De inventione d i a l e c t i c a l l b r i trea» cura Alardi Amstelredami.

Coloniae: I 5 l 6

t

ν De inventione d i a l e c t i c a l i b r l onmes l n t e g r i e t recognlti iuxta autographi nuper Dfomlnl] Alardi AEmstelredami opera in lucera educti fidem, atque doctisalmi 3 a c h o l l i s i l l u s t r a t l Iohannls Phrissemii, Alardi AEmstelredaml» Reinardi Hadamaril, quorum scholia . . . contulit . . . Ioannes Noviomagus. Coloniae: Hero Alopecius, [1518].

8vo.

[30]+511 pp. (some misnumbered). Kotes:

Liber I has 29 chapters; Liber I I , 30; Liber

III, l6.

Phrissemius' Introductory l e t t e r to the

Cologne teacher, Matthias Wagener i s dated Cologne, 1513, nonis augustl. Copies:

MH

MoStf"

Pa

Pta£

vi De inventione dialectlcae l i b r l t r e s . Henricus Noveslensis, 1520.

[539]

ifto.

Coloniae:

Copies:

CRv

vii De i n v e n t i o n s d i a l e c t i c a l i b r i t r e s . unsigned, d a t e d : ] octob.

Colon[iae:]

sm. f o l .

[Pref.,

[ 1 5 ] 2 0 , mense

pp. unnumbered.

S i g s . Λ-Κ&, L 2 , A - 0 6 .

( L i b . I and I I

only).

Notes;

L i b . I has 28 c h a p t e r s ; L i b . I I ,

Copies:

(Ob)

22.

vill De inventlone d i a l e c t i c a l i b r i t r e s . Ioannls Knoblouchus, 1 5 2 1 . Notes:

Argentinae:

l*.to i n 8 ' s .

139 H ·

L i b . I , 28 numbered c h a p t e r s p l u s e p i l o g u s ,

with t a b l e ; I I , 2 2 ; I I I , 16 plue p e r o r a t l o . Copies:

Cu

Lbm

Ob

Pa

lx De inventlone d i a l e c t i c a l i b r i I o a n n l s Matthaei P h r i s s e m l i . A l o p i c i u s , 1 5 2 3 , mense augusto. [8]+237+[7 3 1 1 .

[5i*o]

t r e s , cum s c h o l i i s C o l o n i a e : Hero lj.to.

Notes:

Lib I, 28 numbered chapters, plus epllogus,

with table; II, 22; III, l6 plus peroratio. Copies:

Psc

χ De inventione dialectica libri tres, cum scholiie Ioannis Matthaei Phrissemii. Alopecius, 1527.

8vo.

Copies:

PVu

Ce

Psc

Coloniae: Hero [l6]+ij.22+[ll ] pp.

Vbv

xi De inventione dialectica libri tres, cum scholiie Ioannis Matthaei Phrissemii.

[s.l., ] 1528.

lj.to.

[16]+!|.05+[11] pp.

Notes:

Lib. I, 28 chapters and epllogus; II, 22;

III, l6 and peroratio. Copies:

Csc

Cu

xii De inventione dialectica libri tres, cum scholiie Ioannis Matthaei Phrissemii. We che 1, 1529. Copies:

PVu

8vo. Rba

C 5 U 1 ]

Lutetiae: Christianus

[llj. 1+345+[12] 11.

xlii De inventlone d i a l e c t i e a l i b r l t r e s , cum s c h o l i i s Ioannis Matthaei P h r i s s e m i i . naeus. Notes:

1529·

P a r i a i i s : 3. C o l i -

lj-to in 8 ' s .

[l8]+ij.33+[13] pp.

Liber I , 23 numbered chapters and epilogus,

with t a b l e ; I I , 2 ? ; I l l , 16 and p e r o r a t l o . Pbn copy X. 3253 i s inscribed on the f l y l e a f and t i t l e - p a g e as the personal copy of Ramus' quondam defender Jean de Bomont.

See the Illustration.

Liber I , cap. i v , includes a bracketed table o f l o c i , more or l e s s dichotomized, the wortc of the commentator r a t h e r than of Agricola ( p . 2 2 ) . Copies:

Pa

Pbn

Pbn

xiv Epitome inventariorum D i a l e c t i c a e i n v e n t i o n i s Rodolphi Agricolae per Bartholomaeura Latomum . . . Coloniae:

Ioannes Gymnicus, 1530.

pp. unnumbered, A-H®. Copies:

Cu

GOu

[5U2]

8vo.

.

RODOL P H I

A G R I C O L A E

Phrifi), demucntionc diale&icalibritres, cumfcholijslo annisMat than Phnflenuu

«tmi

PARIS

Μ *•''•»/.«

J*** 'f