255 18 25MB
English Pages [260] Year 1991
Digitized by the Internet Archive in
2010
http://www.archive.org/details/hollywoodgothiOOskal
LL! 1991
HUGO AWARD NOMINATION-YEAR'S
DRACULA life
C
of a
LIVES! And
in
this
we follow
icon,
cultural
cnttcally
cobwebby,
archetypal
the
BEST NONFICTION
acclaimed excursion through the
vampire's
from
trajectory
relentless
Victorian literary oddity to master media myth of the twentieth century.
"Ever since my heady discovery
at the
age of twelve of a dog-eared pocket-book
Bram Stoker's classic, I've considered myself something of a Dracula expert. But now I'm humbled— David J. Skal's fascinating chronicle of the great vampire's ascent into pop-cultural legend is crammed fiill of enough revelations, insights and surprises to warm the blood of any chiller fanatic." edition of
JOE DANTE, DIRECTOR OF GREMLINS "Fascinating
.
into
.
AND THE HOWLING
steps beyond the bounds of normal research something approaching archeology." .
AMERICAN CINEMATOGRAPHER ".
.
.
handsomely designed
.
.
.
diligently researched
.
.
.
neatly illuminates Dracula's evolution."
KIRKUS REVIEWS terrific trivia "Absolutely gorgeous ... a brilliant feat of scholarship one of the finest modern examinations of the Dracula phenomenon." .
.
.
.
.
.
LOCUS "Witty, comprehensive ... for those who take Halloween seriously, trick-or-treaters are gone." is something to gnaw on long after those
this
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES BOOK REVIEW "One of
the finest efforts in the the realm of film history
and popular culture
to
come along
in recent years."
THE BERGEN RECORD "Awesomely
entertaining."
THE FLINT JOURNAL SKAL
author of three acclaimed novels of horror and science connoisseur When We Were Good and Antibodies.
DAVID
J.
fiction,
including Scavengers,
is
the
A
of popular obsessions, he is currently completing The Monster Show, a cultural Norton & Company history of horror in America, to be published by
WW.
m
1992.
y
>-;w
BOOKS BY DAVID
J.
SKAL
Novels
SCAVENGERS
WHEN WE WERE GOOD ANTIBODIES Non-Fiction
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
Frontispiece: the three weird listen stand
guard
at the castle in
film version
Unnersal's 19)1
o/Dracula.
(Photofest)
nij.monuopf] NEW YORK LONDON •
Y
Copyright ^
1990 by Visual Cortex Ltd.
All rights reserved.
Printed
in the
United States ot America.
Excerpt from To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Copyright Reprinted by permission of Harper
A
complete search has been conducted
at the
pre- 1977 registration and renewal records of
The
text ot this
book
is
author and publisher regret will
include an appropriate
documentation of copyright
composed
display set in
Composition by the Sarabande Press,
Inc.
previously published visual
any inadvertent omission of acknowledgement and if
I960 by Harper Lee.
U.S. Copyright Office for
all
The
materials used as text illustrations in this book.
credit in future editions
^
Row, Publishers,
8C
in Cloister
Roman
is
provided.
with the
Huxley Vertical Bold.
New
York, and Solotype, Oakland. California.
Manufactured by Courier Companies.
Inc.,
Westford. Massachusetts.
Designed bv the author. First published as a
Norton paperback
1991.
Library of Congress cataloging-in-Publication Data
Skal, David
Hollywood
web
gothic: the tangled
stage to screen
J.
ot
Dracula from novel
by David
/
J.
to
Skal
cm.
p.
Includes bibliographical references and index. I.
Stoker, Bram. 1847-1912. Dracula.
4.
2.
Stoker, Bram, 1847-1912-Adaptations.
Stoker, Bram,
1847-1912— Film and video adaptations. Horror tales, English— History and criticism. 5. Vampire films— history and criticism. 8. Dracula, Count (Fictitious character) 7. Vampires in literature. I. Title. PR6057.T6170787 1990 3.
823'.8-dc20
ISBN 0-393-5080^-7 W.W. Norton &: Company, Inc., ^00 W.W. Norton & Company, Ltd., 10
Fifth
Avenue.
New
York, N.\'. 10110
Coptic Street, London
234567890
WCIA IPU
for
Raymond Huntley
Originals,
who
fid
told
Lupita Tovar
me
the tale.
[E Introduction
CASTLES, COBWEBS,
AND CANDELABRA
3
Chapter One
MR. stoker's
book OF BLOOD
Chapter Two
THE ENGLISH WIDOW AND THE GERMAN COUNT 43
Chapter Three 'a
NURSE WILL BE IN ATTENDANCE AT ALL PERFORMANCES. 65
Chapter Four
A DEAL FOR THE DEVIL, OR, HOLLYWOOD BITES 93
Chapter Five
THE GHOST GOES WEST
HI
Chapter Six
THE SPANISH DRACULA 153
Chapter Seven
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC 179
DRACULA AT A GLANCE 201
Notes
223
Acknowledgements
233
Index
237
"Don't have any picture shows here, except Jesus ones
in the
courthouse sometimes," said Jem. "Ever seen anything good?" Dill
had seen Dracula, a revelation that moved Jem with the beginning of respect. "Tell
Harper Lee, To
Kill a
y
it
to eye
to us," he said.
Mockingbird
him
W
'
•^.M
Introduction
CflSlLtLCOG
S
In which the reader draws nearer to a
shuddering the
Count
modem
and
in delicious anticipation,
he a closer relation than previously
to
imagined, not reflected in mirrors, but lurking all the
THE IMAGE, OF COURSE, woman — blonde,
A
pillowcase
upon
myth,
discovers
them
AND WHITE.
IN BLACK
IS
in
same.
platinum-bobbed,
her
framed
face
by
a
satin
— succumbs to sleep, and more. As her eyes close, looking inward
a dream, a mist swirls outside her
open window, and within
its
gray
depths, like an obscene, winged metronome, a huge bat hovers, eyes blazing.
The cameras
gaze
— our gaze — returns to the dreaming
girl,
then slowly pulls
back to reveal the black-cloaked hgure that has replaced the flapping bat the window. It ...
moves forward
we have been here
before,
silently,
we know what
throws the features into sharp
on the
pillow.
The dark
sleeper's
neck
is
The
scene
is
lips
The
relief.
white as radium
.
.
this
is
.
lamp
the
.
.
talonlike fingers
at the bedside
make
indentations
revealing a deeper darkness
part,
at
with the cold deliberation of a panther
still.
The
.
everyone
in the late twentieth
may not be
able to identify the
instantly recognizable to almost
century as a pivotal scene from Dracula.
We
exact version of the film, or even the performers involved, but the primal
image of the black-caped vampire has become an
modern
imagination. Its recognition factor probably
indelible fixture
rivals, in its
own
of the
perverse
"Children of the ntght
—
vhat
music they make!" Beta Lugosi
way, the familiarity of Santa Claus.
performs a disappearing act
Without knowing anything of without prompting the salient
the myth's origins,
most of us can
characteristics of the vampire — how
it
recite
sleeps by
trick publicity shot
in this
from the 1931
Dracula. (Pholofest)
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC day, rising
from
coffin-bed at dusk to feed on the blood of
its
form of a
ability to take the
stake driven through crucifix, or the
its
how
bat, a wolf, or mist;
heart,
and
by
effectively repelled
power of the Eucharist.
We have
it
must
garlic,
wolfbane, the
received this information by a
curious cultural transfusion, not by direct experience psychological level
living; its
tlie
can be destroyed by a
it
.
.
and yet on some
.
some kind of universal knowledge, however
reflect
veiled or obscure.
Ever adaptable, Dracula has been a
literary Victorian sex nightmare, a
stock figure of theatrical melodrama, a movie icon, a trademark, cuddle swizzle stick,
Dracula
and breakfast
tantalizingly
begs the question put to the ghost
in
Hamlet: "Be thou a
of health or goblin damned."'
spirit
The
appeal of Dracula
and black cape, so
Most monsters kills.
toy,
Complex, contradictory, and confounding,
cereal.
is
hair,
white
tie
take and trample. Dracula alone seduces, courting before he
Unlike other monsters, he
looks too
The emphatic
decidedly ambiguous.
striking at first glance, rapidly yield endless shades of gray.
much
like
one of
us.
not always recognizable as such. Dracula
is
With
he mocks our concepts of
patent-leather shoes and patent-leather
civility
and
society, uses
them
as brazen
camouflage, the better to stalk us, his readers, his film audiences, his prey. Dracula didn't begin in Hollywood, but
momentum. The
film
The magic
occult.
medium
had
itself
I-angella in the
traveled there with an inexorable origins in the trappings of the
lantern salons of Paris in the late 1700s projected bat-
winged demons on clouds of smoke to Frank
Broadway
it
its
terrify
and entertain the ancestors of
1977
rcuval. with sets
and
costumes by Edward Corey. (Photo courtesy of the estate of
Kenn
the
modern motion
of the movies, as dismiss what
we
picture audience.
if
Even today we
still
speak of the "magic"
despite our sophistication about special effects
see
on the screen
as just a set
we cannot
Maxim Gorky, writing Moscow in 1896, the year
of tricks.
Duncan, ©1977)
on the introduction of Lumieres Cinematographe
in
before Draculas publication, was deeply disturbed by what he beheld.
Gorky, cinema
itself
death. "\bur nerves are strained, imagination carries you to
monotonous the
life
people
life,
a
life
without color and without sound, but
who have been
deprived of
unnati:rally
of
movement,
all
silence,
the colors of life."'
himself seems to have had certain ambitions for Dracula as a
theatrical entertainment,
though a successful stage adaptation would not be
realized until after his death.
found
some fiill
of ghosts, or of people, damned to the damnation of eternal
Bram Stoker
To
was a technological vampire that promised a kind of living
But Dractda and vampire
their greatest expression in the
stories in general have
popular media, be they penny-dreadfiil
novels, stage melodramas, or movies. Dractda has been a hallmark of the
motion picture from the early days of German expressionism. The character has been depicted
in film
single possible exception
more times than almost any
fictional being, with the
of Sherlock Holmes, and has now so pervaded the
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
Bat-uinged demons were earliest projected
public, forging
film
and
images
the
a prototypical link between
the fantastic. Abote. the
Fantasmagorie as circa
among
to entertain the
it
was seen
m
Paris
1797. (Collection of the
Cinematheque Fran^aise)
The vampire
as movie usher: a
contemporary metaphor poster.
Cuba)
in
a
Cuban
filn
(Courtesy of the Cinemateca de
Introduction
world of communications and advertising that the novel or see one of the
Count and This
be the
is
last.
history,
it is
no longer necessary to read
film adaptations to be thoroughly acquainted with
his exploits.
not the
book written on
first
the subject of Draada. and
it
will
not
But most treatments to date have largely ignored the fascinating
now
men and women whose
nearly a cenniry old, of the
become entangled irresistible,
its
and
the
in
lives
have
myth's peculiar power. DracuLt has exerted an
at times, Faustian attraction
upon numerous
individuals
who
used the ever-expanding dream-machinery of publishing, theatre, and film to
power and expand
exploit the story's
This book the
historical
psychology.
A
is
also,
its
influence.
without apology, eclectic and interdisciplinary, mixing
own
record with the author's
observations on culture and
completely straightforward academic history would simply not
do the subject matter
justice; the Dracula legend rudely refuses to observe
conventional parameters of discussion, and touches upon areas as disparate as
Romantic and the
literature
politics
Whatever texts
of
all
and modern marketing research, Victorian sexual mores
of the Hollywood studio system.
else
it
might be, Dracula
is
certainly
younger with age, drawing
vitality
from
to attract the serious notice text.
As
the
1
critics, the
of academics as a
story seems to get
and attracting an ever-
a hundred years, and in the
in print for nearly
Victorian
The
longevity,
its
widening public. Originally scorned by the
remained
one of the most obsessional
time, a black hole of the imagination.
book has nonetheless last
decade has begun
significant, if problematic,
997 Dracula centenary approaches, there
will
no doubt
be even more books, revivals, and reappraisals.
The Hollywood of Hollywood the psychic shadow-land theatre to which
we
we
all
Gothic
is
inhabit to
less the
geographical location than
one extent or another, the private
return again and again to watch the midnight movies of
our minds. For quite some time now, Dracula has been the perennial blockbuster attraction.
7^
01^
hud
^
a.
•(«
.
^.:6_-f^
'^'^
I
ctiia to
-
of
Trw advf
to
'Mih
ny
^9a-» cr'/wdm': uion n«.
id
imDngst what kind of pei>;l«^
ami
ture was it on which
and
)>*ny kina and which thraw long quiw»irin«
Chapter
One
OKOfflLOII In which a theatre reviving
manager pens a
a Gothic
tradition,
tale
unspoken tensions between the sexes. portrait, in the actor,
who
terror,
An
ambiguous
manner of Mr. Wilde, of a celebrated knight and is
The unexpected appearance of
not amused.
Mr. Wilde himself old
an
of surpassing
while indirectly addressing
inattentive wife,
rivalries
and a
and new
revelations,
lingering malady.
In the rare books
room of a small
on a
tree-lined
street in Philadelphia
a leather slipcase containing a sheaf of
mounted note
is
cards, almost a century old but not yellowing
library'
— they are an exceptionally high
grade of linen stock, the property of Henry Irving's prestigious Royal Lyceum
Theatre theatre,
in
London. The notes contained on them do not pertain
and are addressed
to
no one other than the writer
to the
himself.
The
culmination of years of obsessional research and rumination, the working notes of an author of fiction, they are written in a able pencil scrawl, as
if
tiny,
often nearly indecipher-
the writer had miniattirized his
the dimensions of his paper.
A psychiatrist, the visitor
is
hand to complement told,
has spent nearly
ten years transcribing, annotating, and interpreting their contents.
The
fre-
quent cross-outs and marginal additions, trailing-off sentences and one-word reminders vividly depict the
fictional
process
— the
writer intuitively steering MamiiCTipt page from
his
unconscious through the refinement of language, discovering the incanta-
tory words and patterns of words that can best describe the troubling image
and give
it
a
form
Dead,
later titled
introducing
The Un-
Dracula,
The Count and
demonstrating Stoker's technique of
in the world.
composition. (Courtesy of John
The
first
page, headed Historiae Personae,
tional characters. Several
names are
lists
seventeen embryonic
unfamiliar: Kate Reed, a
fic-
young English-
McLaughlin. The Book Orange, California)
Sail,
HOI.I.YWOOn GOTHIC
10
woman; Cotford,
mute woman and "a
favor
in
man," servants
silent
names and characters
And
European
to a mysterious Eastern
ring
more
Dr. Seward. Lucy
familiar.
A
Westenra. Wilhelmina Murray. Jonathan Marker. getting life," one entry says).
as Alfred
Max Windshoefifel; an "American inventor of "A Texan — Brutus M. Marix"); a deaf-
professor,
from Texas" (discarded
count. Other
known
a detective; a "psychical research agent"
German
Singleton; a
mad
patient ("theory of
very nearly at the center of the page, the
author has scrawled the name of his pivotal character: Count Wampyr.
Somehow,
stand for an indeterminate period of time.
was too the
.
.
obvious?
.
Rumanian words
and
for Satan
notes
in his
He
let it
didn't work. Perhaps
consulted his typewritten notes.
He
there had to be better. Yes,
— something. He struck out the old name and inked
Wallachian diminutive for "devil,"
till
it
had recorded
and perhaps considered the pos-
hell,
Count Ordog? Count Pokol? No,
sibilities there.
elsewhere
He
it
in
a
then unheard in England:
Draada.
Did
it
He
sound right?
wrote the name again
at the top
of the page, twice, flanking the
original heading. Draada. Draada.
Yes.
One
final time, then, in the
top
left
corner, boldly underscored:
COUNT DRACULA. Bram
Stoker's 1897 novel
puzzles in literary history, a
on the basis of
more than on or a
Bram
Stoker.
(Billy
Roic Theatre
Colleetion, ,\V»' York Public Library at
Lincoln Center. Aitor, Lenox and Tildcn
Foundations)
stylist
the
influential
surveys (although
Cabin and Abie's in
and that only
nineteenth century.
It
has never
of the twentieth cenniry, and the Draada legacy
will
no
is
no mean
feat for
an icon of popular culture,
one consistendy ignored or denigrated by the "respectable"
authorities.
Nosferatu has
late
cannot avoid the
yet DraaiLt remains
and him adaptations are among the most
Stoker's
name does not appear
Victorian literature, the stage version
sidestepped
classic
into the twenty-first.
span of centuries
especially for critical
critics
print. Its theatrical
doubt continue
A
— even his most partisan — and
connection with his minor works
in
most widely read novels of the
and
intriguing
of a minor
technical or narrative achievement. Stoker was not an innovator
been out of indelible
that has attained the status
stubborn longevity and disturbing psychological resonance
of any distinction
word "hack"
among
its
Draada presents one of the most
book
it
in the
Draada achieved
most textbooks of
Only through
in
theatre
1920s rivaling Lhiclc Tom's
and the landmark 1931
film histories.
in
almost never mentioned
enjoyed a popularity
Irish Rose),
most
is
film version
the pirated
a quasi-respectable niche in
is
usually
German
modern
silent
art circles,
in retrospect.
Yet Draada persists. In the words of Dr.
Abraham Van Helsing
in
the
Mr. Stokers Book of Blood
~^
X \jf^^^
Q^,ieJ
M Thea.. W. 49 St. rULlUlN H.I.. wed 4S.t KXTRA MATS. XMA8
Wells, the
maid, supplied comic
president of the Actors'
Fund
relief.
until
She would
her death in
1
later
In addition to the rewritten script, the play had a
tt
much more
Hamilton Deane's need
to
keep down properties costs resulted
in
Liveright's
presence
vampire almost smashing a mirror, then thinking better of
able to spring for a
new
it;
Liveright was
piece of glass for every performance (with the press
agent quick to point out Lugosi's great good luck with the part, despite
breaking mirrors night after night).
The London Dracula was
and malignant; Lugosi presented quite a different picture:
Latin lover
from beyond the grave, Valentino gone
combination that worked, and audiences
makeup
slightly rancid. It
— especially
his
middle-aged
sexy, continental,
with slicked-back patent-leather hair and a weird green cast to his
YKAR-S D.AVS
Dracula was a constant
in the theatre
1927 and 1928. his
NEW
substantial
physical production, with sets by veteran designer Joseph Physioc, and elaborate effects.
II
989.
—a
was a
female audiences
—
pages
in
HOI.I/iWOOD GOTHIC
86
even wallowed
relished,
With
on
a hit
his
the romantic paradoxes.
in,
hands, Liveright set his general manager
high gear, plastering the city with heralds and ciation guide to the
demon
painted a
Broadway show
("DRAK-u-la"
title
rhyme
that the public might
the
name
the
advised, apparently for fear
fliers
became one of
face with bat-wing ears that logos;
appeared on posters,
it
Cline into
Lxjiiis
complete with a pronun-
with "hula"). Artist Vernon Short
and was even manufactured
letterhead,
fliers,
the earliest
the show's business
fliers,
The
mask.
as a souvenir
prowling
English nurse had been replaced with an American counterpart, and while the
New York
production never matched Hamilton Deane's record oi thirty-nine
"faints" at a single performance, eight patrons
As The New
nervous shock.
overcome spectators were
in
traffic tickets,
be not a
commercial collusion with the management were
more
received in quiet dignity, or
had to be treated for purported
York Times reported, "Cynical hints that the
likely
by some further enterprise: a series of
perhaps, which, having been tied to an automobile, turned out to
summons
to court but
an order to appear
and limerick contests.
perhaps reacting to the profit
volatile fortunes
margin for Dracula began
Broadway show of the
Freedman making
stickers
and hats
.
of a touring production.
viability
And
."'" .
Despite the good press and good box
of the
A
at the Fulton at once.
baseball schedule, properly decorated with advertising.
time.
at
"The
office, Liveright
He of
on
it
his
other business interests. His
^7,000 a week, a decidedly low "nut" for a play
is
doing extremely well," noted Harold
to his partner Carl Brandt, "over
a very large profit
was not convinced
was being overly cautious, or
^13,000
last
week, and Horace
is
because of the cheapness of the company."^'
Nonetheless, Liveright hesitated on taking a chance with a tour.
Hamilton Deane, who had touring little
Rorace LiveriphL pretenis
Sensational Vampue Mystery Flay '
j/ie
in his
from the American production owing
with Florence Stoker, was frustrated by the road.
He
let
know
Balderston
blood, and
who was
earning very
to the harsh terms of his contract
Horaces reluctance
that his patience
to take Dracula
was nearing
its
on
end, and he
was prepared to take the same steps Mrs. Stoker had taken with the Morrell adaptation.
He
announced
that he
was preparing
new vampire
a
play,
Adrcrtiiiiig art for the touring production.
had nothing to do with Dracula and which he would own outright.
(Free Library of Philadelphia Theatre
would tour
in
it
America
to capitalize
one that
And
he
on the publicity of the Liveright
Collection)
production
if
Liveright continued to
sit
on Dracula.
Balderston wrote Freedman that Deane's unfinished vampire play "will
probably be snapped up and put on the road by somebody as
I
in
wrote Horace, you can't copyright the vampire idea,
effective
one
in
backwoods who about
in
it,
New it
is
York,
a
for,
new and
the theatre, and there are probably a million people in the will
whether
go it
is
to a theatre if they hear there's a
Dracula or some other
.
.
." It
vampire walking
would be
in
Deane's
.
"A Nurse Will Be
in
Attaidanee at All Performances
87
The Count
is
effectively repelled
by
Van Helping and the power of the Host. Bela Lugosi and Edward
Van Sloan both would repeat
their
stage roles on film. (Courtesy of
Ronald Posters)
Balderston concluded, to "skim off the vampire cream ahead of
interest,
Horace
if
he can, because he has been badly done by the Stoker executor and
gets only
As
10%
of their royalties from the American production."'^
the box office receipts began to
wane
in the
spring of 1928, Liveright
decided to gamble on the money-making potential of a tour, and subcontracted the west coast rights to producer O. D.
Woodward. The
play
closed at the Fulton after thirty-three weeks and 241 performances, earning a total
of ^350,857.50," including
its
New Haven
tryout. Lugosi
and Jukes
joined the west coast company, which played ten weeks in Los Angeles and
San Francisco and grossed ^108,080.''' Dracula no one wanted to "awesome,
resist.
fever was a national epidemic
A Santa Barbara critic summed
exciting, revolting
it
up, calling the play
and quite unhealthy, but so are many of the
things that give us a kick these days."'^
V.
BoTstlHollywood Movie
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC It
was
Encouraged by the California success, Liveright
just the beginning.
and Cline mounted
their
own
tour of the eastern seaboard and the midwest.
This time, Liveright was able to obtain Raymond Huntley,
New
York, "very
Huntley
recalled.
He
his first
because Bela Lugosi wanted too
likely
accepted ^250 a week for the tour
choice for
much money,"
— twice
Liveright s
original offer.
Huntley remembered Liveright
him because he wanted me at all; I
put
thought
my
usual
it
to
green, and a week or two
wear green makeup and
later,
on the 'subway
I
was
in
in
call
didn't take
I
We opened
a reminder that
got an extremely abrasive telephone
was asked to do,
had a great disagreement with
clash. "I
was just bloody nonsense.
makeup on and got
I
in
circuit,' in the
I
Bronx,
that either
me
to incur that kind of trouble so
him
seriously
Atlantic City and
I
was supposed to wear
from Liveright
green makeup, or he would report
no position
and austere," but had a
as "slightly distant
one major
vivid recollection of their
to Equity.
I I
think,
I
did as
I
Of
course
went out and bought
"
some green
greasepaint.
Huntley would also be surprised by the lengths
would go
in fabricating press releases.
to
which Louis Cline
For the Philadelphia engagement, the
papers reported that Huntley was a master of theatrical makeup, inspired by
Lon Chaney, who was even consulted by
the police in their investigations. "I
once converted the head of a famous detective into a
was quoted as having
said.
"He
was then seated
with a murder was brought into the room.
The
fleshless skull,
in a chair
and a
"
Huntley
man charged
criminal was so frightened that
he made a complete confession." So advanced was Huntley's cosmetological magic, the story held, that he could "make a negro out of a white man, or vice versa, so convincingly that not even his best friend could
tell
Perhaps best of all was the claim that Huntley could "make a or a
Bfld iMgoii makes a hypnotic pas at
a pliable maid (Nedda
Harrigan)
in the
New
York
production. (Free Library of
Philadelphia Theatre Collection)
woman
out of any
man
in
one hour," as
if
the
first
the difference." devil, a skeleton,
two forms led somehow
"A Nurse Will Be
in
Attendance at All Performances
was
It
Compared
American hoopla machine doing
just the great
to his experiences in
89
.
Huntley knew nothing of his uncanny
naturally to the third.''' Needless to say,
powers.
." .
its
work.
London, Huntley recalled the American
production was "a complete change, a physically more expensive and
suppose you could say managed production."
performance onstage, only on the top, but
I
think
Horace
His reaction?
film.
He "I
I
never saw the Lugosi
thought
it
on
Liveright would have insisted
was way over that."
Did he
have any regrets over turning down the Broadway role that had made Lugosi a star?
"No,
many
years after rather a sore spot with
here,
you know, and worked with well-known directors and made authentic
to tell
progress in
my
you the
truth, I
was young and naive and Dracula was for
me
because
I really
should have stayed
profession." (Huntley, of course, went on to a far happier
career in the theatre than Lugosi would ever know, his hundreds of memorable characterizations including
work
in
such films as
Retrtbrandt,
Room
at the Top,
and Young Winston, and innumerable West End appearances. The theatre world was saddened to learn of
his
death
in
June, 1990.)
Touring, Horace Liveright knew, was expensive. Draculas profit margin
was
ofifset
attraction.
to
some extent by
the outlay of an extra
^300
to
the increased advertising required by a "novelty"
But the investment
^500
a
week
^50
at the
in
box
paid:
manager Cline found
ofifice.
And
the
number of publicity
could be conjured up for Dracula appeared to be endless. in
that, consistently,
promotion would translate into an additional
At
the
stunts that
Ohio Theatre
Cleveland, the uniformed nurse routine was augmented with "faint checks"
refunding admission prices pro rata for performance time missed by patrons indisposed by shock for any portion of the evening.^''
By May 1929,
Liveright s total earnings
dollars. Less than a year later, the figure
on Dracula exceeded a
million
was reported to be approaching two
million.
Raymond
Huntley, meannhile,
interpreted the
audiences the
in
same moment for
London. (Courtesy of
Dracula Society)
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
90
In spite of the income, Liverights cash flow problems persisted. Both Stoker
and Balderston were not receiving
As
mercurial showman. realize, too, that
he
the Stoker group
contract to
renew
in
dealing with
is
.
.
.
their royalties in a timely fashion
Balderston complained to his agent,
there
is
for he
is
should
some very temperamental people over
here,
nothing to stop them from denouncing their
the middle of the run and compelling
it,
from the
"He
him
violating that contract right
to put
and
up
a big
premium
left."***
Florence Stoker, of course, would have to be extremely hard-pressed to cancel the agreement Left to right: Bernard Jukes,
Edward Van
Sloan. Herbert Bunston, Terrence Neill
and Dorothy
Peterson.
The American
production dispensed with the trick
dummy.
renew.
He
— there
was as strapped
would be no guarantee that Liveright would
financially in his
way
as
Stoker was
in hers.
As
it
stood, however, there was income, however unpredictable.
Whatever
fragile sense
of control or predictability the widow possessed
Dracula instead providing a bloodcurdling offstage groan.
(Free Library of
Philadelphia Theatre Collection)
over Dracula
December
16,
in
the
autumn
of
1928 was to be abruptly shattered.
On
without prior announcement, the Film Society entertained
its
"A Nurse Will Be
members wich
Attendance at All Performances ..."
in
91
accompanied by an astounding
a private showing of Nosferatu,
statement: that they had obtained permission for the showing, not from Stoker, but from an
own
American motion
picture company,
who now claimed
to
the rights to Dracula.
What was
happening?
nightmare, the whole
She made angry
No
German
inquiries.
one owned the rights but her!
nightmare,
She wrote
it
to Thring.
to her cataract-clouded eyes a press cutting that
crazy dream. months,
make
The
it
And
was
finally
like
was the
—
she held close
something out of a
had been published two months before
article'''
and no one had told her! She read
sense of the words
It
was happening again
contained.
it
Was
— two
over again and again, trying to she going
mad? Was any of
it
possible?
"DRAGULrTO Universal A
BE FILMED.
Buy Screen Rights. FOR VEIDT?
PICTURE
" Dracula," the Bram Stoker,
late
famous which
traordinary success on the
by the had such ex-
thriller
London stage
and in the provinces recently, has been bought by Universal for the screen, and, be made into a full it is understood, to Unilone talking and sound picture. The purchase of " Dracula" is in accordance with Carl Laemmle's policy of obtaining for the screen those famous have proved themselves novels which amazing magnets as stage productions Prominent among the Universal as well. plums for the coming year are " .Show Boat," and " Broadway," the latter of which cost Laenunle j/!"45,ooo. No cast has been suggested yet, but the part of Count Dracula, the vampire, stated to be admirable for Conrad is Veidt.
Lies. All
but
of
it lies!
Germans
all
But above
the same.
all it
And
was Germans again
this
— new Germans, yes,
time they were in Hollywood.
y
«;..
^
Chapter Four
DHL
fl
IDtV
foil
Hollywood
or,
Bites
In which the picture people smell the blood, but hesitate
still,
and say
yes
and
German Count appears
the
must be stopped,
"l
NO TIME MUST
CONSIDER
no, in
lest
and
New
and
yes again,
York,
and
which
in
and
Detroit,
he spoil the occasion.
BE LOST OVER ENCLOSED,"
WROTE
FLO-
rence Stoker to G. Herbert Thring. She scribbled with feverish speed,
dropping prepositions and handwriting was huge,
articles in her haste to
fitting
reach the matter's meat.
someone
eyesight was failing badly. "I have only just this minute learned that
has
sold
company
pirated
the
Her
only a few sentences on each page; the widow's
of the
film
German
Dracula
to
an
American
."' .
.
This time, Thring was instantly supportive of the widow. "Whether the
performance was private or public does not matter. retain a film
which
is
examined the acknowledgment had sent him. "Can you
America purchased ica,
and who
is
No
person has a right to
an infringement of copyright," he assured
tell
in the
me from whom
the film rights?
her.
He
Film Society's program which Stoker the Universal Film
Whether Dracula
is
Company of
copyrighted
in
Amer-
Mr. J.V Bryson who has so courteously given consent
to an
infringing performance?"'
James Bryson, head of the European Film Company, was
in fact
UniverActor Conrad
sal's
point
man
in
England, a flamboyant promoter and showman
who had
already been embroiled in a bizarre scheme to smuggle into England a print of Universal's Phantom of the Opera as a publicity stunt.
He
had misrepresented
groomed by
Veidt.
Universal as the new Lon Chaney,
was the studio
's
first
choice for
Dracula. His appearance
in
The
Last Performance (1929) was
the film as sensitive military material in order to obtain a British military
escort
—a
photo opportunity,
in
short.
The scheme
backfired, a scandal
virtually
a screen
(Photofest)
test
for the role.
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
94
ensued, and the Lon Chaney classic was actually banned from the British
Empire
for five years as a consequence.
After receiving an interrogating
letter
from the Society
of Authors'
Messrs. Field Roscoe and Company, the Film Society retained
solicitors,
lawyers of
The Film
its
own, Gilbert Samuel and Company, who made a formal
Society had seen the front-page announcement
(the lawyers explained) indicating that
They
Universal.
Mrs. Stoker had sold her
then approached Bryson,
referred to a cable he had received
reply.
To-Day's Cinema
in
who confirmed
rights to
the story and
from Carl Laemmle, head of Universal
in
America, stating that the rights had indeed been purchased, and that he, as Universal's British distributor, had no objections to Nosferahts being
members of
shown
to
the Film Society.
Florence Stoker was adamant. She had never heard of these people. She
had never sold the rights to anyone. C. D. Medley, of Field Roscoe and Company, told Thring he was skeptical
of Bryson's
story,
"particularly as
find
I
it
was
he, or his
company, who
forwarded the announcement to the cinema weekly."' Bryson now disclaimed that he
had
explicitly given
permission for the performance.
Stoker did not have a face-to-face showdown with Nosfcratits aiders and
when
abettors until February 7, 1929,
the Bride of Dracula
herbivorous henchman, their solicitors
in tow.
which Montagu restated the history of the
affair,
A
met Nosferatus
tense meeting ensued, in
and denied that he had been
harboring the film since the previous controversy. (The program notes for the hor Montagu, pioneer
film presenationut
and Florence Stoker's nemesis.
performance stated that the print of the
(The Library of Congress)
as stock footage being readied for export to Australia in a safe located in the
same room the
Society's technical staff
original statement
from Bryson's
purchase, which only
film
happened
office
compounded
had been discovered, by chance,
to use.)
He
produced the
concerning the alleged Universal
the insult to Stoker:
the draft notice
contained a paragraph, struck before publication, to the effect that Stoker had
been asking £50,000, but Universal had been able to have
its
way with her
for
a considerably lesser sum. Fifiy thouicmd poimds!
the
lies
much? The
that sale.
Stoker could not believe what she was hearing
were bad enough, but
But
.
.
.
.
.
.
was
it
.
.
.
possible that she might be able to ask
draft did not, however, reveal the final terms of the fictitious
£50,000!
Montagu, round-faced, round-spectacled, an enfant
terrible with artistic
pretensions and communist leanings, must have been an almost incomprehensible figure to Stoker,
*According had
flirted
and she
to him.
Stoker was born poor and had spent her
to film historian Richard Koszarski, a noted expert
with the idea of filming Draaila as early as 1915.
on Universal, the snidio
A life
Deal for
the
95
Devil
maintaining a precarious foothold on the middle class;
born rich and now dabbled fashionably
in socialist circles!
He
He
He
didn't
seem
to
insisted that
what he
had probably been plotting
this for
understand the diiference between art and thievery.
had done was completely innocent.
Montagu had been
years!
Stoker demanded that the film be turned over. Montagu replied that
would be for
it
distinctly
— the Film Society had, after Was
this creature!
sidizing thieves
she
it
now
paid £40 for the print.
to pay for the privilege
was socialism
at
its
The
films
these criteria.
of
artistic
He would,
n
of being robbed? (Sub-
essence!) Stoker's lawyer pointed out it
fit
however, be prepared to give them a warrant that no
made of the
film during the period
Tuesday, December
again, but
or scientific interest. Nosferatu in his opinion
use of the film would be
^^ 'roDA.'Y's
insolence of
explained that one of the objects of the Film Society was to collect
and preserve
fijture
all,
was quite useless to him since he couldn't exhibit
that the film
Montagu
—
it
hard for him to give up the film without being compensated
1928.
18,
"DR AGUL
A."
Six-Year-Old Revival Fails
o{ Draculas
to
Make
Flesh Creep.
copyright without Stoker's express permission.
FILM SOCIETI'S SHOW PIRATED VERSION.
Stoker was outraged. She told Montagu precisely her opinion of the character of his infringement. to bargain.
The
film
The
was not something
Medley pressed Montagu might
film that
exist.
rights in the matter
Montagu
were hers, and not
his
to be preserved, but to be destroyed.
for information about additional prints of the
alluded to one copy in use in
France
— he had
Our flesh might havu crept six ago when Murnau put " .Xnstri.dii lore
when it
no
direct
knowledge of
but had seen the advertisements in the Parisian
it,
As
for America, yes, he believed
way of an organization
it
had traveled there as
called the International Film Arts Guild.
At
well,
by
So
it
least
one
had already happened, exactly as she feared: Nosferahi had reached its
was revived by
proved
relentless, infringing pestilence.
to ignore
Montagu's suggestion that they be
permitted to hold the film "as a sort of curiosity upon an understanding not to
profit
He
fi.irther
advised her that, while the Film Society had
worth mentioning
in the affair,
made no
formal legal action might well be taken
against Bryson and Universal, as a warning to the cinema trade that Stoker
alone held the film rights and that "any person
who
yt-ais "'
in
MMi
and
brilliant
photograpny
in the picture. yut ihev are nearer ic a photo album than a filni. It will be doubly interesting in this respect to see Ihat up-to-the minute version of " l)racula " which is scheduled for production by Universal. The sanguine exploits .of the blood-sucking Count should make an eerie but an entertaining feature. Of the stiorls shown the most fascinating ,.
was " A
wrote Medley, concerned that the Film Society might not be financially strong
fllass of Water " one of Hritisb Instructionars best efforts, in which the horrors that lie in our drinking water before it is filtered by the M.W.H. proved both -dreadful and decorative. Other items included a bright little
sides in the event of their losing an action
silhouette film of a Crinim fairly tale, an excellent subject for Vuletide amuse-
her
will
be dealt with.""*
The widow, enough
however, backed off "I
to pay the costs
on both
am
not anxious to go to law," she
brought against them.'' If they would pay the costs already incurred, the matter might be dropped. Bryson and Universal were unresponsive to requests for an explanation of their behavior. Stoker
them
fiarther.
She couldn't
afiford to alienate
them.
made no move
to challenge
However outrageous
their
ment, and a " nearly abstract" in which bowler hats defied gravity and men walked into lamp-posts and disappeared.
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
96
behavior, they were interested in f^aada. and they had
than she had ever seen at one time
By
March,
late
of Nosferatu
in
her
more money
to
spend
life.
the Film Society had agreed to turn over the positive print
in its possession.
Stoker expressed some ambivalence or confusion film. The matter was handed Company were similarly unversed in the myself know how these films are destroyed or
over the means by which she might destroy the over to the lawyers. Field Roscoe and requisite rituals. "I
whether
I
do not
have any means of doing
consider the matter
when
I
get
it."''
it,"
The
Medley wrote Thring, "but
record
is
silent
on the exact
will
fate
of
the film, but presumably the English print of Nosferatu was consigned to the
flames around the
first
of April, 1929.
Did Florence Stoker ever doing
battle,
and
finally
actually see Nosferatu? After seven long years of
capturing the enemy,
it
would seem strange indeed
if
she didn't insist on looking the thing in the face. But her letters leave the distinct impression that she considered the film it
might dignify
it.
Silent
better not seen. If she had once been
now
his
Lady Bracknell, on
Nosferatu, of course,
first
time
in
is
destroyed by sunlight for the
look at
indeed on
all
points, firm.
would go on to be recognized as a landmark of world
adaptation ever would, or ever could. vampire
To
Oscar Wildes Cecily Cardew, she was
this point, as
cinema, elevating the estimation of Dracula
A
beneath contempt.
movie vampires could not be heard, and they were
adaptation, the piece had
begun
its
in
a
way no other dramatic
With Hamilton Deane's
constricted
descent into kitsch; Nosferatu, however,
Nosferatu. Unfortunately for
Florence Stoker, the film easily dealt with.
itself
(Photofest)
was not so
had mined Draadas metaphors and focused
its
meanings
into visual poetry. It
had achieved for the material what Florence Stoker herself would never
A
Deal for
achieve: artistic legitimacy. For
all
the Devil
97
popular fascination, Dracula would
its
forever be an object of critical condescension. Nosferatu was not Stoker's only contretemps over the film rights.
turned against C. A. Bang, matters,
when
it
who had been
was brought
Dorothea
commission of 25
to her attention that his
A
percent of her earnings might be vampirically high. ensued.'' Stoker
lawsuit
and countersuit
engaged the representation of the well-known play broker
Fassett, a principal
of the London Play Company. "The Stokers
were suspicious of all agents after the Bang business," she
acknowledged that she had been instrumental had employed her own
solicitors,
lawyers and vouch for her
The
She had
advising her on motion picture
good
cynical, chain-smoking,
at
in their
later wrote. Fassett
getting rid of Bang, and
some expense,
to lobby the Stokers'
intentions.**
business-sawy Fassett was
in
many ways
a
caricature of the hard-nosed theatrical agent, and a sharp contrast to the
Victorian Knightsbridge widow. But they had something
women
"Dorothea wasn't
liked a fight.
middle of a row, and she always seemed to have
remembered Laurence
remembered
the regal
"sweeping
and out" of
in
F.
The
or
common: both
A. L. Bram Stoker
in the
of them going,"
six
who worked
of the Hollywood interest
for Fassett
He
in Dracula.
(as she often signed papers)
"To
Fassett's Picadilly office.
boy, one old lady tends to look like any other.
had presence," Fitch
five
Fitch, a veteran British agent
as an office assistant at the time
in
happy unless she was
truly
a seventeen-year-old
But Florence Stoker certainly
recalled.''
alignment with Fassett was fortuitous for Stoker, and
that a film sale for Dracula could have been
made without
it
unlikely
is
Fassett as a
Harold Freedman,
the literary agent
stage-managed Draculaj
Hollywood. (Courtesy of Robert A.
mediating presence. But more important the Brandt and Brandt Dramatic
came
into the Dracula film deal as
was Harold Freedman, head of
still
Department
stated,
Freedman was famous
almost conspiratorial whisper
style that
marked
in
Discretion, tact, and quiet persistence were the
many
the wheeler-
in literary circles for the
which he held
in
who
York. Freedman,
John Balderston's agent, displayed
ways the antithesis of the aggressive, abrasive dealers of the period.
New
in
under-
client discussions.
Freedman hallmarks, and
would eventually earn him a legendary status among agents. (Among biggest coups would be the film sale of
My
Fair
his
Lady for ^3.5 million plus a
percentage, a staggering figure for the time.) Fassett in uals
London and Freedman
most responsible for Draculas
in
New
counts credit the interest of Carl Laemmle,
supposed dedication to the project,
it
was
and Freedman's quiet behind-the-scenes that
would
actually close the deal.
York would be
film sale to Universal. Jr.,
or the director
Fassett's
efforts in
The
the two individ-
While most
hand-holding
New
story, told
ac-
Tod Browning's in
London
York and Hollywood
here for the
first
time,
Freedman)
who
difficult sale to
'
HOI.I^WOOO GOTHIC
98
provides a fascinating look at the reality oi Hollywood deal-making
of the early
Even before her about
tion
days
New
of the novel.
Bang, Stoker had received some inquiries
falling-out with
film rights to Dracula.
Lxjndon and
in the
talkies.
The
vexing thing was, the success of the play
York was spurring the
The
in
not a renewed apprecia-
real interest,
play was the thing, and the play and the
book were very
different animals indeed.
John Balderston was among the
first
to realize that
to sell the film rights to the novel alone,
and
Stoker was going to try
of any claims by
rid herself
himself and Hamilton Deane. Ironically, he had been aware of the Universal
[r^j WESTERN UNION
'^^
story for over a
[H^ _CABLEG|IAM_
^^
Freedman contact Universal
I
month before Stoker
— and had
in fact
had
directly to confirm that they
his
agent Harold
had not purchased
the rights. Balderston was nonetheless sure that Stoker had been negotiating,
with the desire to cut him out.
He feared that "these
and so stupid that they might
let
the film
people are so pig-headed
go smash rather than give us a
percentage," he wrote Freedman. "There remains the point, whether the film people wouldn't pay us something on the side when they understood the position?"
He
suggested that there was a
chiavellian diplomacy." It
Examples of the many
transatlantic
cables that fueled the film deal.
fine
chance for Freedmans "Ma-
'*'
was the beginning of a long string of mutual misunderstandings and
mistrusts between Stoker,
Deane, Balderston, and Liveright
that
would haunt
the negotiations for a screen version oi Dracula. Balderston was particularly
stimg by the seeming discounting of peculiarities
of the people concerned,
York
if I
at all
had not exercised
own
his
contributions.
my
Balderston wrote to Louis Cline. "Horace would be the
lady then, and
I
think
else can."
I
can do
it
to the
in
again, but
I
I
first
to admit that he
did get around the old
doubt very much whether
'
Deane and Balderston had had equally any proceeds
from a
her son had proposed to
film sale.
Deane
a previous, informal agreement to split
But now, Balderston learned. Stoker and
that they sell the
not the Balderston. Balderston tried to disabuse
Deane
Deane
version of the play,
of this notion, pointing
out that the Dramatists' Guild would undoubtedly back Balderston's claim.
Hollywood would buy one thing and one thing only
success.
"The Deane
— equity
version not only would not have been a success [in
York] but was actually turned down by Liveright and everybody
came
New
well-known powers of diplomacy,"
was several times on the verge of chucking the thing.
anybody
"Owing
would not have got on
this play
own in
a
New
else before I
along."'-'
Liveright had by this point realized his terrible oversight in not negotiating
any film rights
in his theatrical contract.
version would go back to the book.
Now
He,
too,
had presumed that a
film
he was faced with the necessity of
A having to purchase the
them
at
fihri
Deal for
from Stoker
rights
Balderston wrote Freedman:
robbing her for years
hand, and
.
.
.
am
I
and she
have become very
I
I
have not been trying to rob
realizes that I
Her son
was, over the film.
having lunch with him on Friday.
dealing with
is
"Mrs. Stoker and
Horace
.
.
He
seems a
also
has the film thing
.
"Mrs. Stoker, after some hesitation and consultation with her son, told
on Sunday
that she has decided to sell
believe,
£4200
seemed
friendly,
.
.
.
the rights to
all
this includes all the rights, talkies
Horace. The price
be turned into a
talkie.
away from
a distinct interest in the matter,
This seemed a new idea to
previously led to believe that
we were
her. I think I
Stoker asked Balderston
if
me is, I
and everything. As she
although entirely ignorant on the whole subject,
Deane and myself have
her that
rights
in
of Bang, her confidential agent who has been
of course Bang told her
decent chap and in
order to have any interest
in
all.
friendly over the inequities
her, as
99
the Devil
I
if
explained to the play
is
to
She had been
her.
a pair of robbers trying to get the film
made her
see that
she should
sell
it is
a matter of joint equity."
Horace
the rights. "I didn't give
her he undoubtably wanted to
a definite answer, but
I told
a novel idea to her.
She thought he wanted
to
resell,
which seemed
produce the film himself"
Balderston pointed out the need to delay the release of any film for a few years, "as otherwise
Horace might
sacrifice
film
people."" Liveright had,
one
studio.
all
in fact,
our royalties for a large price for the
begun
quietly negotiating with at least
Stoker and her son took the matter under advisement, and delayed
signing.
They decided
instead to increase their asking price of Liveright to £6,000.
Liveright didn't have the money, and the bluster.
His
finances, as usual,
were
lower offer was probably
first,
in chaos. Instead,
he appealed to Harold Lugoii with actrea Hazel Whitnwre
Freedman
to offer Stoker
an advance of ^ 1 ,000
continue his studio negotiations.
He
if
she would permit him to
proposed a three-way
Stoker, a third to the playwrights, and a third to himself.
It
split,
a third to
was a ludicrous,
desperate offer and went nowhere. In addition, Liveright's second road com-
pany of Dracula had gone bust due in
royalties
owed.
He
Dracula's stage success largely his doing. rights in ties
to
bad planning and he was badly
simply had no credibility.
No
and subsequent attractiveness
But there was no denying
that he
doubt, he to
low ebb, and
his
advertising illustrations that was traveling
that
had simply waived the film literary
in publishing
proper-
were also
days with Boni and Liveright were numbered.
vampire attacking a
felt
Hollywood were
what would become one of the great money-spinning
of the twentieth century. Liveright's fortunes
in arrears
One
at a
of the
on the road with Dracula showed the
girl in flapper-style attire.
Now, on
the brink of the stock
market crash, the picture had another, more resonant portent for Liveright,
during the west coast
tour.
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
100
himself one of the leading symbols of the jazz age and
Meanwhile, Dorothea Fassett had received agent
named Wilkes. The Stokers
from, after
They bided
all.
its
a firm offer
excesses.
of £6,000 from an
hesitated. Universal hadn't
been heard
through the spring of 1929, convinced
their time
that the value o( Dracula could only increase. Their agents thought otherwise,
and urged them
The
to take the tide at the flood.
Banquo-
negotiations, however, were about to be interrupted by the
appearance of an unwelcome shadow.
like
Nosferatu had surfaced in America. First in
the in
Playinf
/Void
New York with
German Count was
teeming
its
millions, then,
emboldened,
in Detroit,
seeking audiences with impunity. During the
June an advertisement ran
The
in
New
York Times: the "First
week
first
Showing
America," the ad proclaimed. "Inspired by Dracula," the film was said
"A
thrilling
mystery masterpiece
— a chilling psychodrama of bloodlust." Max
Schreck's face adorned the ad like the image on a postal stamp from
Horace
Liveright was
to see the film. It
among
was showing
Greenwich Village (decades
little-cinema
A
Ihrilling
of
lilretlc^l
F.
klnad-Uiit
hell.
and sent Louis Cline
Film Guild Cinema, on Eighth Street
later, as the
in
Eighth Street Playhouse, the same Picture Show).
movement had been gaining American momentum
The
as reaction
52W.8ihSt. [--V'JSpringJJ-
M
New
Guild was one of
(1890-
York's jewels. Architect Frederick Kiesler
of
"The Lul Liujh"
Film Guild Cinema lonllfiuoui Daily. ; P. in MIdnlte. HiMrtInc Ha(.. Junti H-^Tho (:in»m« Kvrnt of erty to
make anything out of the
that an offer
Bureau
right
sterling
mond
in
most advantageous moment.
his film cannisters until the
"I
am
strongly of the opinion
going down every minute ...
is
film rights,
we ought
do
to
it
if
any of us are
now." She reported
was being tendered to Stoker through the International Copy-
— but only
if
they would bring the price below £9,000 (a
pound
was worth about ^4.75
at the time).
The
name appeared
in cables as a
suspected party to negotiations
Huntley's
with Columbia Pictures.-**
The
remembers nothing of the
affair.)
offer
was
refused.-''
Ray-
offering price quoted was ^25,000. (Huntley
Stoker insisted on ^35,000, with three-fifths
guaranteed to her, and two-fifths to Balderston and Deane.-'^
The
deal
through. In the matter of actors. Universal had lost Conrad Veidt,
fell
who
returned to Europe rather than risk the talkies with his heavy accent, and their next choice,
Lon Chaney, was
luider contract to Metro.
And
above
all,
Freedman's direct contacts with various picture executives produced a consensus: the price of Dracula was simply too high.
Stoker, however, trusted her Bracknellian instincts on Draatla: the floor for the property
In January, rights, tion.
them
he wrote,
was now 035,000. Stock market crash or no.
Freedman apprised Balderston of "still
The Laemmles then.
Lx)n
seems
are
to
narrow
itself
down
coming here next week and
Chaney has
finally
the situation.
The
film
to the Universal proposiI
am
going into
it
with
decided to do a talkie with Metro.
A
Deal for
the Devtl
105
Universal were unable to wean him away at the time ... If he doesn't get along with will
Metro on
this thing
his first picture, then I
was hot here suppose there
be some chance of Universal's getting him."^*^
By mid-February interested in
it,"
the situation hadn't changed. "Universal are
Freedman wrote, "but won't do anything
still
very
unless they can get
Chaney."'*^
In March, Dorothea Fassett wrote
Freedman
that Stoker's sleep
more being disturbed by thoughts of Nosferatu. "She would wrote Fassett
as to the film's career,"
dryly,
whether some arrangement was made to
"and know whether
it
was once
have details just died or
kill it."^*^'
And Gould was nowhere
Neither had occurred.
like to
closer to revealing the
film cannisters' whereabouts.
By
early spring, possibly because
of the growing awareness of the enor-
Chaney's Dracuia would likely have been a very different creature than the one with which
we are now
familiar. Here, for example,
is
Chaney's pop-eyed conception of a
vampire
in
Midnight.
ton Chaney,
the
Man
of a
Thousand
Chaney was
Faces, seen here with his own.
Universal's second choice for
following Conrad Unfortunately, to
Dracuia
Veidt's departure.
Chaney was under
Metro. (Courtesy of Scott
contract
MacQueen)
London After
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
106
Actor Bernard Jukes campaigned unsuccessfiilly for
a studio
sale.
This maniacal publicity portrait
was
his calling card.
mous the
potential in talking pictures, and despite the international financial mess,
nibbling started again.
On March
13,
Freedman cabled Balderston:
INFORMED HORACE DRACULA CAN BE BOUGHT REASONABLY MATTER UP WITH METRO UNIVERSAL PATHE COLUMBIA. On both Bela Lugosi
I
HAVE
April 8,
— who had earlier been denied an option — and his manager
Harry Weber wired Freedman
that they
had lined up a deal for ^40,000,
cryptically promising the biggest studio, an excellent, reputable director,
and
most importantly, a willingness to buy and produce Dracula with Lugosi as the star.
The name of
play broker
the studio
was revealed two days
named William
BELA LUGOSI SPOKE
TO ME
Dollofif wired
later
when
Freedman with
a west coast
a counteroffer:
IN REFERENCE PIcnURE RIGHTS
DRACULA
A
Deal for
107
the Devil
STOP CAN OBTAIN HIGHER FIGURE FOR RIGHTS THAN METROS OFFER STOP PLEASE HOLD OFF NEGOTIATIONS. DoUofFs deal — allegedly for ^50,000
—
fell
through when
right's lingering
involvement
purchaser grew skittish over Horace Live-
his
in the project
and confusion over who indeed was
representing the rights. Liveright had sold his publishing interests and was
now on
the west coast working for
a "production associate," and Dracula.
version
still
Paramount Publix Corporation on
Although Paramount boss Ben Schulberg had some
— possibly as a result of Liveright
Schulberg
his
s
prodding
Paramount
the lot was enthusiastic. In April
salary as
vainly trying to raise the purchase price for interest in a film
— almost no one
story editor E.
J.
else
on
Montague gave
opinion that the theme was "strictly morbid" and might run into
problems with the recently inaugurated Production Code. Montagne "the very things which
made people gasp and
about
talk
it
felt that
[on stage], such as
the blood-sucking scenes, would be prohibited by the code and also by censors
because of the effect of these scenes on children."^'
The
whom
fact that
Metro considered Dracula with Lugosi and not Lon Chaney,
they had under contract,
Tod Browning, was cancer
— so
much
fully
is
interesting
aware of his
and suggests that
star's failing
health
his director.
— Chaney had throat
j"^
so that he, and the studio, were willing to do Draada
without their most bankable asset, the
Man
of a Thousand Faces.
Bernard Jukes, the actor who was making a career out of playing Renfield
on the
stage, also
apparently
came
became party
to the negotiations in the spring
The
close to securing a studio offer.
promoted the property, and
himself, fairly aggressively; a series
publicity portraits of Jukes as the fly-eating studios, but finally
of 1930, and
were of no
/^/
actor seems to have
of
startling
maniac made the rounds of the
avail.
Discouraged with the sluggish, approach-avoidance stance of the studios,
Harold Freedman decided
to visit the coast in
person to bring the matter to a
head. Arriving in May, he found the Universal situation "fairly cold" with
Metro and Paramount-Famous-Lasky
as the
he "had to get several directors interested
more
likely candidates.
in the proposition
However,
and one or two
individual producers" before LJniversal agreed, in late June, to take Dracula
for ^40,000 rather than see
As Freedman Laemmle,
much
for
German
it
go
to a rival
later explained, "I finally
Sr.'s definite
Laemmle,
company.'-
It
was not an easy
put through the sale
in face
expressionism.
As
oft-cited fondness for the
the elder
Laemmle
shadowy
later told
of Mr.
tradition
an interviewer
So of
in a
discussion of Frankenstein, which LJniversal produced the following year, "I
don't believe in horror pictures.
It's
morbid.
People don't want that sort of thing," he
None
said.
of our officers are for
"Only Junior wanted
rarely posed for
May
this likeness
tiations for
sale.
written objection to the purchase of the picture."^ ^
Sr.'s
A^ent Harold Freedman photographs, hut his wife
it.
it."^"*
Junior hadn't always been a junior. Born Julius Laemmle, the son of the
sketched
around the time of the nego-
Dracula. (Courtesy of Robert
A. Freedman)
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
108
former Oshkosh, Wisconsin, haberdasher and self-made movie mogul had inherited the control of the studio
on
reciprocal gesture that suggests a plot film, the
diminutive young
man
his twenty-first birthday. In a bizarre
from
died and was resurrected as Carl Laemmle, are
a matter
still
American
culture:
revolving
around
morbid German doppelganger
a
relinquished his
own name and His
Jr.
identity: Julius
and achievements
abilities
of debate,'^ but he made one indelible contribution to
Hollywood horror movie, an obsessive new genre
the
threatening,
controlling,
male
powerful
supernaturally
monstrosities.
would be fascinating to icnow Freedman's precise
It
tactic for
mediating
between father and son over Draaila, but even with Balderston he
is
talizingly reticient, stating only with implied exasperation that "there
no use
is
going through the various things that had to be done to get the thing
tan-
over."'*'
And
Universal had agreed to agree, but the contracts had yet to be signed. it
was
at this
juncture that two unwelcome guests decided to
presences known, and perhaps to spoil the occasion. vampire.
The
York
their
was Nosferatu, the
other was Horace Liveright, the producer.
Symon Gould had
New
One
make
decided to bypass Freedman and approach Universals
office directly, asking a fiat
payment of ^1,000
to relinquish his
M. Asher was
print of Nosferatii. Universal balked. Associate producer E.
under some pressure to obtain the for assistance in obtaining
on July
film;
Symon Goulds
he wired Freedman asking
19,
print of the
Murnau
film
on
a rush
reasonable fee. Asher seems to have been more interested
basis at a
studying the film rather than destroying
was already encountering major
it;
difficulties
in
the Universal scenario department
over
its
screenplay treatment.
Why
not see what had already been produced?
Gould wouldn't budge. Asher asked Freedman
to
employ some personal
diplomacy. Universal was willing to pay ^200 for a ninety-day "rental." Freed-
man warned Gould that the film had no fiiture commercial use, and that he be enjoined against exhibiting direcdy:
Gould ^400
it.
could
Gould responded by wiring Carl Laemmle, Jr.,
PLKASE WIRE DECISION REGARDING DRACULA PRINT. Laemmle
told
terms were unreasonable. Asher authorized Freedman to pay up to
his
— and to rush the print by airmail to Universal City.
Simultaneously,
Horace
Liveright, stung over being closed out of the
Draaila negotiations, told Freedman that unless he received a financial consideration, he
would
file
a lawsuit against Universal
on the
basis that
adaptation constituted unfair competition to the stage version, held
rights.'''
He knew
slightest
possibility
released.
He
of
that Universal litigation
that
would never sign
if
in
its
which he
film still
there was even the
might prevent the
film
from being
also insisted that his share be paid not by Universal but bv the
A
Deal
for the Devil
109
— Stoker, Balderston, and Deane, with whom he clearly
owners
felt
the need
to settle a score.
To Freedman's money
relief,
he did not hold out for an exorbitant amount of
— Liveright wanted cash, needed
a protracted
The producer
fight.
claim waiving
all
finally
it
badly,
and was not
accepted ^4,500
future film rights in Dracula.
in
Freedman was
able to persuade Stoker and the playwrights to pay any
Universal quietly
made up
really
if
not, however,
more than ^1,000.
the rest. Liveright was never told
partners had actually paid him. "It will be fatal
looking for
exchange for a quit
how
Liveright should
little
know
his
before
the execution of this deal that the owners are only paying ^1000," wrote
Freedman
on August
to Fassett
minus agent commissions, went
13. Fifty
percent of the ^39,000 balance,
and 25 percent to each of the
to Stoker,
playwrights.
That
left
only the matter of
Symon Gould and
his
vampire shadow
in
nitrate. his dickering with the exhibitor. He wired E. M. CAN GET PRINT FOR FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS DOUBT WHETHER ANOTHER IN EXISTENCE \XTRE ME IF WILLING PAY THIS.^^
Freedman continued
Asher: BELIEVE
LJniversal was willing. to
On
August
13, LJniversal
Brandt and Brandt, and, two days
Harold Freedman's covering presume,
is
letter
the print you intended
print of Draada.
We
later,
forwarded a check for ^400
they took possession of the film.
took no chances,
"This,
I
when you wrote me about sending you
a
legalistically:
a cinematic "death warrant" for
have no print of Dracula, as you know, as we have made a
deal with you for the motion picture rights of this play. "Nosferatu, the Vampire has been adjudged by the courts to be a violation
Mrs. Stokers turning
it
rights,
and the courts have ordered the prints destroyed.
over to you for the purposes of destruction and
in
I
of
am
view of our
contract with you for the delivering over to you of the rights to Dracula for
motion picture purposes."'''
No was
doubt, Harold Freedman didn't believe for a second that LJniversal
actually going to
Nosferatu was a far
perform a
more
be infringed upon
sacrifical rite
over the film
practical one. Nosferatu
itself,
— their interest
in
had infringed, and now might
cannibalized and reborn. In
its
marriage with the
cinema, Dracula would become an unstoppable, unquenchable fixture of the public imagination.
The
Florence Stoker, John L. Balderston,
Hamilton Deane and Symon Gould signed
nuptials, however,
would prove a bumpy nightmare indeed.
Nosferatu
m
the
summer of 1930.
and end
stands on
their hair
in delightful
anticipa-
mystery and thrills to come. Say "DRACULA" and you re talking tion of the
of a stage play that broke >r
attendance in every road -
New York and
show city on the map.
Louis
Bromfield author of
'
The
Green Bay Tree" and other adopting it The director is T od Browning who gave you THE UNHOLY best sellers
is
for the screen
.
.
.
THREE and OUTSIDE THE
LAW ords
(now breaking recfirst run houses
in
everywhere).
DRflCUU r\.
r^'
ry
'
Chapter Five
MGiSUIBItSI In which the
and
in
Laemmles
but the director
and
IN
studio
rites
are finally administered,
and
reqidres armadillos,
much, but needs
be finished.
to
INTENTIONS THAT DRACULA BE A "PRES-
ITS
announced the signing of
as they
put
nearly half a year, he paid
Laemmle claimed
New
earlier,
to have hired
to be released
Broadway
It
difficult to
his Pulitzer
his established reputa-
imagine a writer farther removed from the world of
Hollywood, for that matter
— than
Louis Bromfield, and
it
is
wanted to exploit the publicity value of Bromfield's name
his serendipitous leave-taking of a rival studio.
largely forgotten today, Bromfield versatile
his contract.
dramatist.
likely that LJniversal
and
from
England family saga called Early Autumn (which Laemmles
purported the mogul had actually read), and
— or
Brom-
Hollywood by
him on the strength of
tion as a is
in the trades), the
but after being given nothing to do for
Goldwyn $ 1 0,000
publicists
Dracula
it
Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Louis
the screenplay. Bromfield had been lured to
Samuel Goldwyn some months
novel, a
odd,
("A Universal Super Production,"
field to write
Junior
is
the thing costs too
ACCORDANCE WITH
tige" effort
build a castle, but have no tenant,
which the cinematic
temperament, though
his
was a
prolific
Although
his novels are
and popular writer of a
tendencies toward political reaction and the
championing of the "natural aristocracy" would begin to put him out of public
New
favor during the years of the
Deal.- Genuinely curious and enthusiastic
about the creative potential of talking pictures, Bromfield recorded sions of the film colony in a
New
The
Hollywood
The that
York as
it
Times.
"There
is
new
style,
in the
March
his
impres-
30, 1930, issue of
an intelligence and talent gathering
never gathered before.
talkies offer a
some day
Sunday feature
in
The preproduction It
much more
is
most hopeful, most promising.
interesting to
work
in ... I believe
they will assume proportions as an art form as great as Anglo-
trade
ddrertiiement for Dracula
promised a film both erotic.
Little
of
literary
and
either quality
survived the filming. (Courtesy of
Saxon
literature. I really
Bromfield,
who had
do."
never been west of the Mississippi, was entranced by
Ronald Posters)
V.
Borst/ Hollywood
Movie
)
HOI I.YWOOD GOTHIC
112
the benevolent climate, the clean air and sunlight, the endless groves and
flowering plants. Later in
life
he would devote
to farming, agrarian reform,
much of his energy and
and conservation;
it
writing
easy to understand the
is
seductive spell California cast over him. Friends, he said, had tried to warn
him. "I was told that
I
was about to
lose myself in a
world that consisted
physically of a valley between
some mountains owned
actors, directors, oil speculators
and realtors and
built
entirely
by picture
over with dwellings that
vaguely resembled yurts, pagodas, tepees, pueblos, igloos and medieval castles. Spiritually, the place
was simply desert. All
art, all spirituality
withered
when
brought within ten miles of Hollywood." Like Harker on his way to Transylvania, Bromfield jotted impressions of the local landowners and peasants. milieu as stratified into three separate castes
He
saw
his
down
his
newly adopted
— the native Californians, whom
he idealized; the glamorous picture people; and desolate emigres from the
American elsewhere. The
castes never mixed.
Nathanael West, over them
And,
as
if in
anticipation of
hovered "a swarm of locusts composed of
all
prophets and radio announcers,
realtors, cult-leaders, religious
who
talk far
too much."
Elsewhere
in
the article
— which vacillates weirdly between wide-eyed — Bromfield notes with evident distaste the
optimism and revealing cynicism "religious cranks, the
dog poisoners, and
who have descended on Southern
in
general the collection of freaks
California ...
It is
cheap and easy to accuse
the picture industry of fantastic houses and fantastic decoration, but its a false
accusation
.
.
.
The
responsibility lies with fat, middle-aged
from the Middle West, who sublimated libidos
in
Uniyersal to produce a "prestige"
Grand Rapids Louis
Anna Held
to
shame."
Bromfield, at this point, had no conception of the degree to which
— and
— would eclipse Grand Rapids Louis Horror movies — of the genuinely
Dracula
ambitious for the studio's budget. (Billy
Seize as an outlet for sublimated libidos.
New
women
a perfect orgy of overstuffed sofas,
treatment of Dracula, had a vision too
Rose Theatre Collection.
and elderly
have released their
Seize and boudoirs that would have put NorelisI Louis Bromfield, engaged by
of prairie
life
after years
horror movies
in
York
fantastic, supernatural variety
general
— had
not been invented yet, at least not
in
Public Library at Lincoln Center, Astor, lu'nox
and Tilden Loundations
America, where conventions dictated that supernatural occurrences always be "explained away," usually as the disguise or machinations of a criminal. In a sense, Bromfield efifort
was being asked
to create a genre,
and
his first, intuitive
has a certain significance.
In late July, before the rights to the novel and the play had been formally
acquired, Bromfield was set to
work under Erwin Gelsey, head
of Universale
scenario department. Glowing press releases were submitted to the trades
heralding the arrival of Junior
Laemmles
literary pet,
and the formidable
battle
he faced. According to the July 26 Hollywood Filmograph, "Dracula, one of the
most unique
stories
brought to the stage
in
years, requires not only the
— The Ghost Goes West
sympathetic understanding of
113
screen adaptor but the technical
skill
of a
writer experienced in the development of extraordinary dramatic plots."
The
its
assignment was regarded, ominously, as "particularly Bromfleld soon found out why. Universal was rights to
very
both the novel and the stage play
much
to
do with the
most of the novel
dialogue was almost
other.
The Deane
order to make
in
it
.
.
dramatization had dispensed with
The
Broadway had
resulted
was even further removed from the book.
would have been much better to throw out the play and
It
its
Balderston adaptation was a
vast improvement, but the play doctoring required for in a piece that
process of buying the
problem was, neither had
the
producible on a shoestring, and
unspeakable.
literally
.
difficult."
in the
start with the
— no,
book. But Universal was spending ^40,000 on three separate properties not just three, there were four!
A
novel and three different stage adaptations,
including that ghastly vanity production of Mrs. Stokers, the Morrell thing
and the studio wanted
its
money's worth out of
all
of them.
In addition, two treatments had been already prepared, one by Frederick "Fritz" Stephani and another by Louis Stevens. Stephani had grappled
what
surreal touches of his
own
Transylvania to England
— Dracula, for instance, was to make the in
trip
from
an airplane outfitted with enormous bat-wings.
Stephani's aerodynamic imagination would find
Universal,
some-
with both the novel and the Broadway play, and added a few
listlessly
when he worked on
the
first
its
niche a few years later at
Flash Gordon serial.
Bromfield followed his instincts as a novelist, and turned directly to
Stokers book for inspiration. epistolary style fields
The
material was certainly rich, though the
was a problem. Paying
lip
service to Stokers conceit,
Brom-
treatment opens with an over-the-shoulder shot of Jonathan Harker
writing a letter
from
his
room
Transylvanian inn at the height of a raging
in a
blizzard. Thereafter, the technique
is
dropped, and Bromfield continues with
an enormously visual and evocative recreation of Harkers journey to Castle
Carl Lacmmlc.
Jr..
the "baby
mogul" wbo
c'itablished Universal'; horror tradition
over bis father's strenuous objections.
Dracula, with detailed descriptions of fantastic settings and winding, torch-lit staircases, all
Some
perched on a rwo-thousand-foot precipice.
John Ivan Hoffman — quite — have survived, showing a caped
early concept sketches by the artist
possibly inspired by the Bromfield treatment
superman dashing down a gargoyle-decorated
staircase.
Bromfields visions
would prove ultimately too ambitious for the studios budget, but they are certainly in keeping with the spirit of Stokers original.
The
screenwriter
obviously had in mind the kind of meticulous adaptation of an English novel in
which
MGM would
later specialize.
Unfortunately, Universal's financial health
was becoming increasingly precarious. the studio had sharply curtailed
its
A
year after the stock market crash,
activities,
producing fewer features on
smaller budgets. Dracula would be a "Super Production" in relative terms
(Courtesy of Scott
MacQueen)
^
HOI
14
only;
lYWOOD GOTHIC
5?355,000 budget was above average for the
its
new streamlined opera-
but only a fraction of the ^lA") million Universal had spent on
tion,
its
last
"prestige" film, All Quiet on the Western Front.
Bromfield began with Stoker's Dracula
— a towering, cadaverous old man
with white hair and drooping mustache, a completely different figure from the
suave Mephisto
How,
then,
in
evening clothes that had been popularized on the stage.
was Bromfield
book and
to reconcile the
of inspiration, Bromfield found the means Traveling to Lxjndon and drinking into
"Count de
Ville," the
new
the play? In a clever bit
— Dracula
would be two people.
blood, he would simply be rejuvenated
drawing-room Dracula of the
moments of blood-lust would he
Only
theatre.
revert to his former, novelistic aspect.
in
Thus,
the studio could have things both ways, and get a free dollop of Dr. Jckyll and
Mr. Hyde to boot. It
was an uneasy dramatic device, but probably a good
Bromfield's part, since
Bromfield choices are in the
seemed
it
less
The
He
than inspired.
new character
guise of a
"Mrs. Triplett."
reconcile
to
in
London,
a
political
move on Other
unreconcilable.
the
introduced dubious comic relief
neighbor of the Sewards known as
part was specifically intended
—
at least
by Bromfield
comedienne Alison Skipworth, a performer who could
for the hefty
—
easily
have been cast as one of Bromfield's overstuffed prairie emigres. Mrs. Triplett
was to be the owner of Carfax Abbey, landlord and bridge partner to Bromfield's supernatural aristocrat.
puts Charles
Goren
game, when Dracula uses to
A
fails to reflect in
a
is
is
unmasked during
compact mirror which Mrs.
not
known whether Bromfield added
this
Comedienne Alison Skipvorth would han provided comic relief
in
Louis Bromfield'i
conception o/Dracula. (Photofest)
demand
Dracula
to his extrasensory powers,
a card Triplett
powder her nose.
bridge partner for the Count? It
Due
to shame. Yet the vampire
or as his
own
cynical sop to the
material due to studio
compromising
realities
of the project.
For Samuel Goldwyn, he had been given nothing to do; for Universal, he was being asked to do the impossible.
And
merit, his contributions, if filmed,
would enhance the
expense of
its
budget
— the
London and Transylvanian
his
arrival
in
as envisioned by Bromfield,
honeymoon
at
would render the
with the studio was short. Within a
who accompanied
M. Asher
a stock production of
and cinematic
Universal City, he was being shadowed by
screenwriter Dudley Murphy, associate producer E.
literary
studio's prestige at the
construction of the oversized sets for Dracula's
lairs,
film unproducible. Bromfield's
few weeks of
whatever their
Draada
to
Bromfield and Universal
Oakland, where Bela Lugosi was appearing
at the
Fulton Theatre. Lugosi was no longer
associated with the national road company, then playing the east, having held
out for more
money than
Liveright was willing to pay.
Raymond
despite his misgivings about the production, had accepted the role.
Huntley,
The
venue was probably not the best showcase tor Lugosi to be seen
Fulton in
by
The Ghost Goes West
115
Universal; aside from the second-string cast, there were half-empty houses
during the Oakland engagement
— weak evidence indeed of Lugosi's box office some
appeal to an increasingly cost-conscious studio. Despite
won
bling in the press that Lugosi had
Bromfield/Asher/Murphy sibilities
trip
unofficial
mum-
the film role, the real point of the
was most
likely to
study the cost-saving pos-
of the stage version over the book.
Bromfield was not the
author to be pulled into the crushing
first literary
machinery of the Hollywood studio system, and he would not be the
"Work
Several months later he told a fan magazine,
in
last.
Hollywood from the
writers point of view can be colossally unsatisfactory and there are plenty of
moments when
discouraging into
bit
by
something that seems new and
you see your idea being transformed
bit
unfamiliar."''
With
passing years, his view
of Hollywood would become even more negative. Shortly before Bromfield began work on Dracula, Universal formally
announced Tod Browning director at Metro, and
it
as director.
Browning had been Lon Chaney's
picture deal in anticipation of also obtaining picture
— any
Chaney
him
possible that Universal signed
is
picture
— spelled
collaboration would be considered
the
all
fascination with twisted, deformed,
box
Chaney office,
for a three-
for Dracula.
A
Chaney
and a Browning/Chaney
more bankable. Chaney's
endless
and grotesque characterizations was
ri-
valed only by the publics bottomless appetite for more. Chaney's rise to fame in the
star
20s was the result of one of the oddest psychological bonds between a
and
his public that
Hollywood has ever seen (and
a
phenomenon of
popular culture that has not yet been examined at sufficient depth). Chaney, of course, had turned
down
and instead remained
at
Universal's offer to buy
Metro
to
make
him Dracula
the carnival crime
as his first talkie,
drama The Unholy
Louis Bromfield's enthusiasm for Dracula
soured as his screenplay was revised beyond
Three,
To
On
which Browning had already directed once as a this day,
one hand,
film history;
Browning remains a maddeningly
his films possess a
silent.
recognition.
difficult director to assess.
thematic consistency almost unparalleled
in
an obsession with the bizarre and grotesque, with the plight and
vengeance of the social outsider, and a fascination with the tawdrier aspects of
show business all
— carnivals, sideshows, fake mediums, and confidence games —
of which become skewed metaphors for unhealthy
These obsessions reached
human
relationships.
a climax in 1932 with Freaks, one of the
most
notorious films ever made, featuring real circus freaks cast as the sideshow denizens
who gruesomely avenge themselves on a beautiful,
To many
cineastes.
Browning
is
treacherous
woman.
a major auteur in a minor key; others, however,
point out that his technical execution rarely does justice to the brilliance of his concepts. His films should be good. But
product
is
an unholy mess. There
fascination of his work, even
if
is
more often than not
the
Browning end
no denying, however, the enduring
the fascination
is
akin to watching an auto wreck.
(Free Library of Philadelphia
Theatre Collection)
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
116
The
reclusive,
director
alcohol-tormented
Tod Bronming produced
one of the most ohsessirc bodies of
work
in film history.
would be
his
Dracula
most famous film, but
hardly his best. (The British Film Institute)
Browning had a reputarion slipshod
manner
in
as an alcoholic,
which many of
his films
caused him to be blacklisted for two years believed that Irving Thalberg had fired
reason. his
His drunken escapades
drinking pals,
who
told
his inebriated exploits. In
stuffy assistant
New
manager
also
which may account for the
were executed;
in the early 20s,
him from Metro
engendered a
in
his drinking
and
it
1929 for the same
kmd of perverse awe among
and retold (and undoubtedly embellished) one of the most
at the St. Francis
had
was widely
colorful,
Hotel
in
tales
of
Browning confronted a
San Francisco during a
Years Eve party, who was evidently displeased with the directors
obstreperous demeanor. "As the evening waned, the animosity waxed.
Tod
The Ghost Goes West
yanked out
his false teeth
117
— uppers and lowers — and hurled them at the A.M.
with the suggestion: 'Go bite yourself!'"^
Browning
cultivated a flamboyant persona, favoring loud socks, louder
shirts,
and the loudest
1935's
Mark
ties.
to the racetrack."
He
was evidently
self-sabotaging behavior
sawdust and
of
"When
Actress Carroll Borland,
on the
tinsel
— he
There
is
it
Mountain" was
the
Over
his
behavior and kept him
his
his specialty),
some-
in
assignments.
Metro
at
in
1927, or a project so similar
who was aware of
film historian
and
archivist Philip
J.
Riley,
"Browning's story called for the
vampire to attack by drifting into the room as a mist as female characters were
named Lucy and
from the ruins of an old
who
the
Florence Stoker had waged over Nosfcratn. According to
bitter legal battle
Dracula.
in
Both lead
they had the vampire calling on them
estate next door. In both stories they brought in an
tried to save the heroine
by placing garlic around the room
groom stood watch over
while the maid and the leads,
from
own impromptu
the years he had developed a network
created serious concern for Irving Thalberg,
older expert
in
evidence to suggest that Browning and Chaney had begun work
on an unauthorized version oiDraada that
his
him
for
he was going
often breaking into song (an a capella rendition
set,
times a card trick or carny routine.
of cronies who indulged
like
skilled at deflecting attention
was known to provide
Moon Comes Over
the
who worked
he usually "dressed
of the Vampire, recalled that
young male
her. Also, the
Jonathan Harker and Arthur Hibbs, were very similar." Thalberg's
reaction was quick and to the point:
The
"Change
it."^
production that emerged was filmed as The Hypnotist, and
released as London After Midnight. pire," the character
detective intent
was
really a
While
it
featured
still
Chaney
as a
finally
"vam-
double role for Chaney; he also played the
on solving the mystery. Chaney s makeup was one of the most
startling creations of his career, rivaling even his
figure in a beaver hat
and bat-winged
coat, a
Opera phantom:
shock of white
a scuttling
hair,
pointed
dentures, and eyes kept bulging by painful wire-and-plastic appliances.
What, we must wonder, would have been Chaney's concept of Dracula? Undoubtedly, the requiring nothing
Man
of a Thousand Faces would have balked
more than evening
Chaney Dracula would almost star,
making
makeup
full
menacing
clothes and a
certainly have
been
significantly
at a role
stare,
and
reshaped for
a its
use of man-into-bat transformations and other spectacular
effects. Bromfield's treatment, with
the sort of approach that
its
double-faced vampire, hints at
would have maintained the Chaney mystique.
Perhaps Chaney would have insisted on playing both Dracula and Van Helsing, aided
Chaney
in
by two voices, doubles, and
split
screens
— the
London After Midnight certainly suggests the
Chaney might have been
double-casting of
possibility. Alternately,
quite effectively cast against another
Metro contract
London Atcer Midnight; Metro
wtis
worried about another mjr'm^ement debacle, a la Nosferatu. (Courtesy of
Philip]. Riley)
The Ghost Goes West
Barrymore immediately comes
star (Lionel
fact play a
memorable
variation
to
119
mind
on Van Helsing
in
— and Barrymore would
in
Browning's 1935 remake of
London After Midnight, called Mark, of the Vampire). Unfortunately, any possibility of Chaney's ever assuming the role for
Universal or anyone else evaporated when his chronic throat ailment was
A few days later,
diagnosed as terminal cancer.
contained the following
Variety
announcement:
Wray, the Neck-Biter Hollywood, June
John Wray monster
bltlner
21.
play the neck"Dracula" for Uni-
will In
versal.
Tod Browning
will direct.
Wray, who had played the vicious Laemmle's triumph All Quiet on
drill
sergeant Himmelstosse in Junior
the Western Front,
was an extremely unlikely
choice for Dracula, and he was not mentioned again. It
was only the beginning, however, of silly season
in the
matter of Dracula
casting.
Conrad
Veidt, the performer originally mentioned by Universal in connec-
tion with Dracula,
had decided to return to Europe rather than brave
talkies in
English, in which he was not completely fluent and which he regarded as a professional risk. slightest,
accent would not have hampered Dracula in the
his
coming of soimd.
limited by the
would return that a
Although
he was probably correct to believe his career would be distinctly
to
Hollywood
Later, of course, his English perfected, he
as a specialist in wartime villains.
judging from his
many
somnambulist
The Cabinet of Dr.
Man Who pantheon
in
fine silent
it
is
clear
performances, ranging from the murderous Caligari to the tragic
Gwyneplaine
in
The
Laughs, Veidt might well have elevated the role of Dracula to status.
While Bela Lugosi should have seemed the obvious choice was as true
in
1930 as
it is
actor a chance to play the
same
role
on
film.
among them
trained actor with a troubled personal
would be the alcoholic carny the performer's
for the part,
it
today that a stage success did not guarantee an
actors for the part, foremost
in
life,
Nightmare
own circumstances
that
Universal considered a number of Ian Keith, a magnetic, classically
whose best-remembered
just enjoyed a successfial
New
film role
Alley, a part that so eerily reflected
it is
uncomfortable to watch. Another
front-runner was William Courtenay, a distinguished
had
But
opportunity was lost when Universal lost Conrad Veidt;
brilliant
New
York actor who
York run and national tour
as a cloaked
The
devil in black pajamas.
campaigned for
magician
in
The
Spider.
Perhaps the most unusual Dracula of
been Paul Muni, mentioned
in several
all
would have
accounts as one of Universal's serious
A
publicity shot used by iMgosi as he the film role. (Free
Library of Philadelphia Theatre Collection)
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
120
contenders. Muni,
who was
widely touted as
"The
New Lon Chaney"
multifaceted appearance in Seven Faces for William Fox in
after his
1929, insisted
repeatedly in print that he had no interest in enacting grotesques, and difficult to
casting.
imagine him actually accepting such a
Muni was appearing on
Broadway run
HOLLYfruOD FILMOOLIPH
role.
At
stage at the Pasadena Playhouse in the pre-
ot a split-personality drama. This
One Man, and was
Harold Freedman attempted another performer early
in
Dracula" he wired the studio.
more
part might be infinitely
Young
as Marker).
some leverage on
to e.xercise
behalf of yet
negotiations with Universal: "It appears to
Joseph Schildkraut might be a
(Coincidentally, Schildkraut
"Dracula"
certainly
followed at the Pasadena Playhouse by Dracula with saturnine
Victor Jory as the Count and the then-juvenile Robert
To Play
is
within the range of Universal's viewfinder (in a related bit of inspired casting,
Muni was
Ian Keith
it
the time of the film's
brilliant piece ".
.
.
of casting
in the
name
me
that
part of
man in this man into it."''
Casting an attractive leading
effective than putting a character
and Horace Liveright would be
at different times
married to the same woman. Elise Bartlett.) Bela Lugosi continued to lobby energetically for the role, despite Univer-
expressed lack of enthusiasm; Junior
sal's
Bela Lugosi and Will-
iam Courtney Are Being Considered bu
There done for
much
been so
who
about
Universal,
will
said
pla^-
in the actor.
Laemmle had
The Last Performance into Hungarian, and and
has
of watched wnth interest who powers that be will select. Daire Rumor has it th.it Universal
sort
flatly told
the agents
Lugosi went so far as to donate
services to Universal's foreign-language unit,
Dracula
everybody
that
he just wasn't interested
at
negotiations with Florence Stoker was asked
intercede with Stoker on Universal's behalf.
dubbing Conrad
some
— or
At
his
Veidt's role in
point during Universal's
took
it
upon himself
— to
the time the sale was closed,
Lugosi wired Harold Freedman that he had spent months promoting Univer-
the
has selected Ian Keith,
who
ished a picture on their
lot.
appeared
this
he
for
Fox
working
Filmi at
Ctotliing."
in
KXO by
sal to
Florence Stoker via cables to London, trying to bring
price.
Would Freedman
down
her asking
please express an opinion to Universal tor his being
the logical choice for the part?
Trail"
right
is
fin
Prior to
"The Big
and
the directed
ju~t
now
"Shceps Louis Wolin
Lugosi apparently did not understand that donating services and acting as an unpaid intermediary
He
didn't
in
negotiations was putting him
comprehend
in
a terrible bargaining
that expressing enthusiasm tor the film in
bcim.
position.
For some time >l has been rumored that Bela Lugosi was to have the leading role, since he played it so well on the sta^e. both here and
press interviews, and even offering script suggestions (as he did to the Oakland Tribune,
giving his
own
enthusiastic mini-treatment of
how
Dracula's sea
abroad Then William Courtney was mentioned is the man who was liable to gam the part on demand from the
voyage to England might be translated to the screen** might also be inter-
New York
assumed, with a certain touching naivete, that magnanimous gestures would be
offices
Maybe we
of
the
firm.
preted as a particularly nervy kind of butting-in. Lugosi seems to have
ire a bit premature with
our announcement, but we reason to believe that Ian been selected and onless foreseen thing happens Dracula
have every Keith has
some will
unplay
repaid
in
kind, but the
message Universal was receiving was not one he
intended. Lugosi was simply proving that he was desperate for the part and
might be had
very, very cheaply.
Several years to a
New
later,
he related a somewhat distorted account of the
York. Post reporter,
who
printed the entire interview
phonetic interpretation of a "Hungarian
"
accent:
affair
in a bizarre
"De Bram Stoker
heirs
The Ghost Goes West
121
V *^
f
m Chester
Thirsty frontrunner: Ian Keith. (Photofest)
Moms
:
the studio was willing.
(Courtesy of Scott
UCLA
Agents
John Wray:
choice: Joseph Schildkraut.
MacQueen and
the initial
announcement.
(Photofest)
(Photofest)
The
distinguished stage actor William
Courtenay was another leading contender for
Dracula. (Free Library of
Philadelphia Theatre Collection)
Paul
Mum:
not very
likely.
(Photofest)
the
Film Archives)
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
122
asked 0200,000 tor dc film
Zo
me would
dey asked
maybe
a liddle cheaper.
reidts,
but Universal didn't
like to
pay dat much.
correspond wid Mrs. Stoker, de widow, and get
I
wreidt and wreidt until
I
aboudt two months, Mrs. Stoker says O.K., we can
hafit
for 060,000.
it
what does Uniwersal do from graddidude? From graddidude dey
two dozens fellows for DraguL
— but
cousins and brodder-in-laws of de
DEIR
And who
not me!
Laemmles
—
it
get cramps, and after
I
Zo
start to test
was tested?
De
deir pets and the pets of
all
pets!"
Actually,
leading E.
M.
search
the
indecision over
Draada
extended considerably beyond Laemmle pets
—
weeks before shooting began,
persisted until just
now
("Efe") Asher, Universal's associate producer
Dracula, to send the following letter to director Roland West,
in
charge of
who had
just
directed The But Whispers (a creepy mystery released by United Artists, with a
masked, cloaked
character
title
who would
be a direct inspiration for Batman):
"Dear Roland,
"We
will start
Dracula
in
about three weeks.
Is there
any possibility of
getting Chester Morris to play Dracula?"
The tough-guy The
specialists role in
And
villain, after all.
a bat
was a
The Bat Whispers had been
a
caped
bat, wasn't it?
director responded:
"Dear
Efe,
"Don't think
I'd care for that part for
Chester as we are looking for
romance.'"'
Meanwhile, although Louis Bromheld remained the several
"of+lcial" scenarist tor
more weeks, screenwriter Garrett Fort (who had
just
completed work
with Browning on Outside the Law, another remake of a silent
gangster
film, this
Lon Chaney
time starring Edward G. Robinson) took out a prominent
trade advertisement announcing his assignment to
Draada
for "Adaptation
and Dialogue." Bromtields enforced collaboration with Dudley Murphy Garrett Fort.
(Hilly
Rose Theatre
Collection. ,\'e» York Public Library at
yielded a script that bore almost
Lincoln Center, Astor. Ijcnox and Tilden
means
Foundations)
Renfield as the real estate agent left
the novel's leading
Browning took save as
no connection
tor melding the novel and stage play
a
hand
much money
who
to Bromfield's treatment.
travels to Transylvania. (This,
man, Jonathan Harker, with precious
in the script as well,
as possible, cut
became even more
fragile,
some of
and
of course,
little
to do.)
and, under an apparent mandate to the
most cinematic sequences,
including the climactic chase back to Castle Dracula. situation
The
was now the substitution of
initial
As
Universal's financial
enthusiasm for the project
waned, the de facto goal was apparently to find a way to
film I}raetda without
having to spend money. Bromfield, disillusioned and drained by his encounter with Dracula, soon left
Hollywood, never
to return.
Though one of
his
books. The Rains Came,
123
The Ghost Goes West
would enjoy a cinematic success as The Rains of Ranchipur,
Hollywood remained up
sour.
"Out of nothing
He
community,
of people, often
the greed of the place cause
want to
their integrity. I
Dudley did
pull out,
Hollywood
to return to
how he summed
brilliant,
them
making compromises. Money and and gradually
to lose their perspective
and
set himself
up
as an independent producer, never
Murphy's most memorable
again.
(Murphy would
1933.
in
he spent the rest of
The Former
effort
would be
first
think
Mexico, where
later relocate his operations to
his life.)
probably the
last
the actor at the time Dracula was being filmed.
She
and Lugosi protegee Carroll Borland,
who knew
seen Lugosi
all
is
touring production at the age of fifteen. "I
in the original
adolescent girls go through a period where they
fall
in love
horses or monsters or whatever," she recalled in a 1989 interview.
thought that Bela Lugosi was the most exciting person certainly the
most magnetic man
room and
the
stage."
his
New
in
casting process for Dracida had reached a state of total paralysis. actress
person living
had
lose
pull out before its too late.""
landmark production of Eugene O'Neills The Emperor Jones, filmed
York
it
similarly jaun-
energy" of the Hollywood creative
criticized the "misdirected
"full
toward
his attitude
is
Dudley Murphy developed a
for Life magazine in 1948."^'
diced view.
into nothing"
all
The
have ever known.
I
women would go
.
.
.
had ever seen.
I
We
whoom! And he
would
did the
with
"And
I
He was
just
sit in
a
same thing on
precocious Borland was inspired to compose a fiiU-length novel,
an unauthorized sequel to Stoker entitled Countess Dracula, which she sent to Lugosi
at his
Oakland
when he made
hotel
a return stage engagement the
following year. "I
wrote
all
wrote him a
know what education
the characters fifty years later,
letter
and asked
his education
was
—
—
I
made
it
modern
he would be interested
I
think
— but he never read English
very well, but he understood. university
if
He
it
in
well,
and
at that time
was very impressed that
'university'
I
it.
don't
was the equivalent of a high school
I
he didn't speak
was going
went to Berkeley on a Shakespeare scholarship
European concept of the
in the 1930s. I
seeing
it
to the
at sixteen
— the
was a much more exclusive one than
ours."
Borland was
thrilled
Leamington Hotel,
when she
his residence
received an invitation to lunch at the
during the stock production of Dracula that
Murphy had seen. "He man was always the European
me — and my
mother.
Asher, Bromfield, and
invited
Remember,
gentleman, observing
this
forms and manners and codes and requirements. hear the novel, thinking to follow this
it
might have some
up Dracula. So he came
He
possibilities as a
to the house in a taxi
very sofa and snapped his fingers for coffee.
It
all
the
decided he wanted to
new
stage vehicle
and stretched out on
took about three days to
HOLLYWOOD GOTHIC
124
read
Borland
to him."
it
strictly professional
day that Lugosis interest
insists to this
Hungarian gentleman stretched out on
Gary Cooper, and
with such other notables as
Bow
University of Southern California.
onstage
later told
Bow — in company
himself, however.
His
high.
fallen for
team of the
Bela after seeing him
anxieties about
"He was
Draada were
no answer!
still,
superstitious and didn't
He
peak
at their
—
kept his tensions to
want to
about
talk
it."
she
Giving up on any possibility of the film role coming to fruition (Hollyeditorialized repeatedly in support of
wood Filmograph, which had casting,
won
the entire football
Borland that he had contacted the Stoker estate and that
demands were too
the film was about to be made, and
said.
that the
in Dracula.
Lugosi their
had
her was
had been linked romantically
their sofa
scandal as a lover of the "Brooklyn Bonfire" Clara
in a
in
and "avuncular." She and her mother had no idea
had gone so
far as to print the
news that Ian Keith had
Lugosis
in all likelihood
the part) he told Borland he was preparing a stock tour of Dracula.
Would
she like to try out for the part of Lucy?
The Carroll Borland. Bela Liigoiii arid protegee, seen here in a test
MGM's Mark
makeup
of the Vampire.
star-smitten Borland was thrilled, but the touring production was
called off* for
when Lugosi suddenly
received
word from Universal.
He
was to be
offered the part.
Borlatid'i
Lugosis elation was brief
appearance would later inspire many
media imitations, including the cartoons of Charles Addams. (Courtesy of Carroll
Universal was offering a ^3,500, for the
title
flat
The terms of
^500
a
week
major studio
role in a
the contract were grotesque.
for a seven-week shooting schedule. film that
had been the focus of
Borland.)
nearly three years of cross-continental and transatlantic negotiations. studio
power play
at
its
baldest and nastiest: in
more than tipped
supplicating the actor had
game: Universal knew
it
ail
his
his scraping
It
was a
and bowing and
hand, and blown the poker
could dictate terms; the Dracula they desired was far
too hungry to put up a fuss.
And
here, Bela Lugosi reached a Faustian crossroads. In accepting the
contract he would almost certainly achieve worldwide fame for a role with
which he had spent years
\
in obsessive identification, the role itself a variation
on Mephistopheles. But here the in
a crazy,
cobwebby
represented on both sides.
'4.
holding out for too
m
from England
— had
roles
were reversed, and reversed again, as
of mirrors
hail
He
—a
had already been stung, by Liveright, for
much money. That been
all
actor
— almost a
too eager to take his place.
always been problematic, even
if
Faustian bargain with the devil
in
good
boy, that
An
times, but this year
actors
Huntley life
had
was one of the
worst, economically, that anyone could remember.
And
Universal wouldn't budge.
*Lugosi did, however, offer Borland the chance to play Lucy Dracula he prepared for the vaudeville circuit
in
1932.
in a
condensed version of
The Ghost Goes West
125
ALL THE MOTION PICTURE NEWS — EVERY PAGE A FRONT PAGE
ni
HOLLYWOOD
-^^
1
—-t^mne^^Bntm
3«iE*35MP«a+