Gender Degeneracy [1 ed.]

Citation preview

GENDER DEGENERACY By Alfeo Celega

“You will never be a real woman…”

INTRODUCTION: 1. As someone who has been on the internet for a while, I’ve seen a lot of degeneracy, especially pertaining to the matter of the gender and sexuality crowd. Faggots have often been the source of degeneracy as they base the so-called “logic” of their actions and behaviors and identities on pseudoscientific coping, unresolved mental illness, and/or oversocialization. This brochure is not written to convert or change faggots. Most of them can’t be reasoned with and will blindly attack and insult those who attempt to reason with them. I’m not trying to fix them, but I am trying to spread this message out so people do not so easily get fooled by the pseudoscientific and degenerate anti-logic of the fag crowd.

2. In this brochure, I explicitly target the gender-obsessed crowds within the LGBTQPFHKRNRRF community. This means that I will not be targeting plain faggots such as homosexuals, lesbians, or bisexuals, however, I will be targeting the trannies, non-binaries, and other delusional fruits. This is a short brochure and is not intended to be a longer, 100-page book. If you want to read a longer book, then I highly suggest “The Fag Agenda” by Alexander Slavros or “If You Give A Gay Their Way” by Joel F. Carberry. In this brochure, I’ll debunk some of the retarded justifications utilized by genderberries and go into depth regarding the origin of so-called ‘gender theory’, its connection to Cultural Marxism, and I will also clarify and correct some of the information that does disabuse gender faggotry.

IS GENDER A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT? 3. A frequent “argument” made by the gender crowd is that “gender is a social construct!”, but how accurate is this? To understand the truth about this gender nonsense for all, we must understand what a social construct, or social construction, even is. The term ‘social construct’ implies something’s foundation is social. Some people believe that culture, for example, is merely a social construct as opposed to something that is biological. Another example could be how we measure time - now, we know that time progresses. I’ve spent time writing this and you’ve spent time reading this, however, how we, as people, designate months, years, decades, centuries, etc., is not necessarily completely biological and intrinsic. Still, we don’t disregard the Gregorian calendar, do we? Absolutely not! Because this social construction of how we approach time has benefitted us and ultimately serves a purpose.

4. Gender is not a social construct but instead the biological traits and inclinations of particular sexes (i.e. the only biological sexes: males and females) appearing in society and civilization. Men have historically been expected to provide and war; bring home food, build homes, and fight to defend their families and civilizations. Women have historically been expected to provide and maintain; they reproduce and birth new generations and keep the familial structure intact. Men have more testosterone than women, and women have more estrogen than men people with more testosterone are understood to be more aggressive and perhaps violent [1]. This is why women, for example, commit fewer crimes on average than men and are generally less aggressive, at least overtly.

Another example of this can be explained with race. Blacks have some of the highest testosterone levels in contrast to Asians [2]. Now, Asians of course commit crimes, notable ones even, on occasion. Still, we all know that Blacks commit the most violent crime in the Western nations they inhabit, not to mention that Black countries are also simply statistically more violent.

5. For a social construction to exist, it must be rooted entirely in social affairs. If we, one day, decided it would be socially adequate for women to wear dresses and men to wear suits with ties, then yes, that would be a social construct, however, we didn’t just do that. Our fashion senses evolved not merely from social regulations or the lack thereof but also our biological inclinations to wear particular clothing. More women simply want to wear

dresses than men. This isn’t rooted in evil patriarchy or late-stage capitalism, it’s just something that has historically existed and has been prevalent and still is to a degree. Some genderberries like to claim that because “male babies used to be wrapped up in pink blankets” but were “suddenly wrapped in blue blankets” this means that there is social dynamism pertaining to the matter of gender. First of all, males and females, even in a social sense, are much more than fashion senses - yes, pink used to symbolize strength and then didn’t, and perhaps we did approach biological sex in a sense that didn’t entirely pertain to biological reality, creating somewhat of a construct around biological sex. Still, the social foundations of masculinity and femininity are very well rooted in biology and hormonal differences, not fashion senses or arbitrary, occasionally flawed or detached social approaches to biological sex and its role in civilization.

6. If something is not rooted merely in society and exists in biology and not paper, then it cannot logically be considered a social construct even if some aspects of how we understand it are socially constructed. Now, I could kind of understand how some people could be confused about this and think that gender is a social construct because some things that we culturally associate with masculinity and femininity were not biologically correct, however, this doesn’t change the fact that we still nonetheless understand and comprehend biological sex mostly adequately (although our collective understanding of biological sex is being distorted by modern tranny nonsense) and have reasonably applied biological phenomena to social roles for the most part. This means that even if there were social constructions built from biological sex, it wouldn’t even matter.

THE ORIGINS OF “GENDER THEORY”: 7. So-called “gender theory” and “gender identity” were created by a few individuals who just so happened to be perverted and psychopathic. In this section, I will discuss three particular individuals who shaped transgenderism, gender theory, and gender identity: Magnus Hirschfeld, Robert Stoller, and John Money. I will also discuss their impact and creations pertaining to the matter of gender theory and correct some diminutive issues found in others that critique them, although you can probably guess and I can definitely assure you that I won’t be defending any of these perverts despite that fact.

8. First, let’s discuss Magnus Hirschfeld. Hirschfeld was born in 1868 to an Ashkenazi Jewish family in Kolberg, Pomerania, which was then in Germany but is now in Western Poland. He studied philology before following in his father’s footsteps, who was a physician, and going into the medical field, eventually earning his medical degree. Being well-traveled, he went to the United States, Japan, and Morocco to study homosexuality in humans and write and research subcultures pertaining to the matter of faggotry. He was a proponent of gay rights who, after many of his patients’ suicides, resorted to activism.

9. Magnus Hirschfeld isn’t really known for any of that. However, he is known for performing the first “male-to-female sex change” (I put in quotations because one cannot change their biological sex) surgery in 1922. He performed the surgery on Dora Richter, who had clear

unresolved mental issues. At age 6, he tried to cut his penis off with a tourniquet. His penis was cut off by Hirschfeld and he was given a fake vagina. Operating in the Weimar era, the era before the National Socialists consolidated and achieved power in Germany, his degeneracy was tolerated except for outrage from the Volkisch movement and scandals he usually entered into, such as the Harden-Eulenburg affair that went on from 1906-1909. Hirschfeld was also a homosexual and miscegenator, cheating on his husband, who was thirty years younger than him, with a fellow gay rights activist, Li Shiu Tong who was from Hong Kong, who was even younger, being nearly forty years younger than him.

(Image of Dora Richter)

10. Next, I’ll move on to Robert Stoller. Stoller was a professor of psychiatry at the UCLA Medical School and a researcher at the so-called “UCLA Gender Identity Clinic” who pioneered the development of “gender identity”, also coining the term in 1964. Born in 1924 in Crestwood, New

York to Russian-Jewish immigrants, he, along with Hirschfeld and Money, have been pivotal in the development of the quack nonsense known as ‘gender theory’. He was also a pervert, wanting to normalize various degenerate kinks, one of them being ‘consensual sadomasochism’, in which one consents to be sexually pleased by being abused and humiliated.

(Highlighted titles pertaining to Stoller’s bibliography)

11. Quoting from his Wikipedia page: “In his most notable contribution, Perversion (1975), Stoller attempts to illuminate the dynamics of sexual perversion and normalize it. Stoller suggests that perversion inevitably entails an expression of unconscious aggression in the form of revenge against a person who, in early years, made some form of threat to the child's core gender identity, either in the form of overt trauma or through the frustrations of the Oedipal conflict.” Stoller essentially sought to normalize sexual perversion and abstract it to a point in which the psychological motives for it cannot be accurately understood. “Mommy issues!” he proposed. Yes, there is certainly a documented correlation between child molestation and trauma affecting people’s sexualities [3], however, Stoller seemed to have blamed women and the connection between mothers and their children for perversion. Quoting again from Stoller’s Wikipedia page: “In 1972, Green, Newman, and Stoller published

Treatment of Boyhood "Transsexualism", which detailed attempts to prevent young children from growing up to be transgender based on the observation that attempts to change gender failed in older children. The treatment involved having the parents discourage feminine behavior and making sure they don't inadvertently encourage it, having the father take a more active role in the child's life as a masculine role model, and having the mother not be "overly close" with the child.” 12. Finally, I will move on to John Money. John Money was a psychologist and sexologist known for his research on gender. Money coined a lot of the terms we see faggots, feminists, and other proponents of Cultural Marxism spew such as ‘gender role’ and ‘sexual orientation’. He horrifically sexually and psychologically abused two Canadian boys, the Reimer brothers. The twin brothers were David and Brian Reimer, and he particularly abused David the worst. David Reimer’s penis was mutilated beyond repair, it being burned. Dr. Money allegedly coerced the two boys to engage in ‘sexual rehearsal’ with each other, taking images of it, which can be considered as producing and creating child pornography. This is, of course, a simplification. A good author, Joel F. Carberry, wrote much more in-depth about John Money and the Reimer brothers, who both killed themselves due to his “work”, in his book “If You Give A Gay Their Way”.

13. These three horsemen of degeneracy are the essential founders of ‘gender theory’ and ‘gender identity’ nonsense. These monsters, because that is what they are, pioneered the social constructivist view on gender. And the social constructivist view is indeed the foundation of transgenderism, other than mental illness and degeneracy of course.

14. In ‘gender theory’, there are two dominant groups. The first being gender essentialists, people who believe that gender is derived from biology and that social constructions may be created around and pertaining to biological sex. In contrast to gender essentialists, social constructivists believe gender is completely a social construct emancipated from biological reality and that anyone can be anyone they want. There is one objective thought one should be able to take from this: social constructivists are retarded.

15. It’s obvious that many of the behaviors of men and women arise from biology and instincts and that, while we may create assumptions and approach things from a social standpoint that lacks any basis in reality, we can clearly determine and adequately assign to people roles, duties, and characteristics that they will, for the most part, innately be inclined to fulfill and act out. Why? Because men are masculine and women are feminine and this is a fact we have known for thousands of years. When we inaccurately approach something, that doesn’t mean that something doesn’t exist, it means we were wrong and did something that didn’t pertain to reality or was unnecessary. Considering gender theory is predominantly based on social constructivism and falsehoods, we too can deem that it is retarded.

WHY ‘GENDER THEORY’ IS CULTURAL MARXISM: 16. Cultural Marxism, which is falsely deemed to be “antisemitic, (If Jews didn’t create and push it, we wouldn’t say they did” far-right conspiracy theory”, is, simply put, the goal and logical conclusion of the implementation of postmodernism into our society. Postmodernism functions on three tenets: skepticism, subjectivism, and relativism. Postmodernism applies these tenets to spirituality, civilization, race, biological sex, etc. It seeks to make these core and real tenets subjective and establish a twilight zone around it - making it seem fake and real. This is a part of abstraction, which was a grand tool of the postmodernists and still is, which is used to confuse people with pseudointellectual blabbering pertaining to entirely retarded, nonsensical gibberish.

17. Postmodernism was largely established by Communists, hence the term ‘Cultural Marxism’, at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany. (((Max Horkheimer))), (((Theodor Adorno))), Antonio Gramsci, and (((Herbert Marcuse))) all being fundamental in establishing Postmodern “philosophy” or Cultural Marxism. Cultural Marxism sought to take truth and established reality, distort it, question truth thence, and then justify the question with “Well, look how distorted it is! You’d be stupid not to question it…” These fundamental truths of humanity such as race, civilization, religion, culture, and biological sex/gender have been distorted by Cultural Marxism, the last example in particular.

18. Two particularly famous Cultural Marxists include Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, both French Marxists and degenerates. Beauvoir in particular is regarded as a ‘social theorist’ who also helped legitimize social constructivism pertaining to gender theory in philosophy. She, of course, being a gender theorist, belonged to the social constructivist group. She and Sartre also were pedophilia apologists who sought to lower the age of consent laws in France and decriminalize pedophilia [4]. She also lost her teaching job after (allegedly) abusing her students.

19. I promise that what I’m stating is not without relevance. Degenerates, Communists, and Cultural Marxists are the very people that helped legitimize transgenderism and gender theory. It was created by degenerates, perverts, and pedophiles as well. It was popularized, manufactured by, and is currently followed by the above types. And why is this? Because the very concepts of transgenderism and gender theory are intrinsically postmodern. We know for a fact that there are two genders and that gender is interwoven with biological sex, not emancipated from it, and we know that the adherents to its false emancipation are, biologically and innately hormonally, their biological sex regardless of how much they cope and seethe. Transgenderism and gender ideology are already so retarded that no one, naturally, takes it seriously - but that is precisely why it’s shilled by Cultural Marxists, Postmodernists, and trannies.

20. Gender theory abstracts what we know about biological sex, uses our few misjudgments on the matter to prove its own supposed ‘validity’, and

convolutes and distorts biological truth to fit its socialized agenda. It claims we, the essentialists and rational human beings, are incorrect and don't understand sociology. Sociology is merely a result of biology - it is our biological inclinations, and I say “our” as a fair generalization for the vast majority of the human race which doesn’t consist of faggots or trannies or non-binary idiots, and the social result of them. If one is socially distanced or emancipated from his biological inclinations and actively works against them with fanatical means, we deem them to be crazy. We do not enable and aid their insanity, we medicate and approach them as others because that is what they are.

21. The Cultural Marxists know this, but they purposely invert this truth and prioritize sociology over biology. Biology may as well be a result of sociology and not vice versa to them. They enable transgenders as per their hatred of Aryan civilization, and this is true because we can observe that most of this degeneracy occurs in the West and Western-aligned nations except for Thailand perhaps. They know transgenderism is a destructive force and that is why they shill and push for it so much and they know that the more they distort gender roles and confuse the Aryan goyim with their abstraction, there will be less breeding among Aryans. We can empirically observe that the transgender issue and gender confusion mostly affect Whites.

CONCLUSION: 22. In conclusion, you should not buy into this obvious shtick or engage with the people that do because it is retarded. Transgender, gender theory apologetics are a nothing burger cooked by pedophiles, perverts with mommy issues, and psychopaths. Remember the three P’s whenever engaging with a fag that shills for gender abstraction idiocy. They are an agent of decay and shouldn’t be interacted with. They thrive off of attention and every drop of attention to them fulfills their thirst, so starve them. Stop enabling these faggots, stop buying into their pseudoscience and pseudophilosophy, and stop shilling for it.

23. If you haven’t yet fallen for gender identity bullshit, then good for you. Keep it up. None of it is worth anything and none of it will ever mean anything. It is a hedonistic and destructive farce crafted by our innate enemies - the opposing forces of natural law - to destroy our people, our history, our culture, and our civilization. If you are a tranny and you are reading this, then you can still change even though you probably won’t. If you’re a transgender apologist, fuck you. You’re enabling delusional people and are sane enough to oppose it but don’t. You’re the scum of the Earth.

24. And last but not least… You will never be a real woman. You have no womb, you have no ovaries, you have no eggs. You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and surgery into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.

All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, and your “friends” laugh at your ghoulish appearance behind closed doors. Men are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed men to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even trannies who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a man. Your bone structure is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk guy home with you, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your diseased, infected axe wound. You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight. Eventually, it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a rope, tie a noose, put it around your neck, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your parents will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you with a headstone marked with your birth name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a man is buried there. Your body will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is an unmistakably male skeleton. This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back…

SOURCES ARE INCLUDED IN THE BRACKETS!