169 110 3MB
English Pages 108 [107] Year 1979
Experience into Thought Coleridge is admired as a genius and derided as an opium addict and plagiarist, The aim here has been to examine his experiences, moods, thoughts, and reactions as a whole and their relation to poems such as Christabely the Ancient Mariner, and the Dejection ode, and to his prose works, and also to look at many of his own statements made mainly in the privacy of his notebooks about his aims and purposes. The result of the new compound should alter some of the uninformed and prejudiced generalizations about Coleridge. The new picture is of a man and poet more human, more inquiring, more sceptical, whose strength and intellectual stature can fully be understood only against a background of suffering and loneliness; a critical, radical imagination is seen not only struggling to survive but to achieve creatively in the process. One of the world's pre-eminent Coleridge scholars, Kathleen Coburn brings a long association with and intimate knowledge of Coleridge's writings, both published and unpublished, to this sensitive study of a complex mind and personality. The Alexander Lectures, 1977 KATHLEEN COBURN is Emeritus Professor of English in the University of Toronto. She is General Editor of the Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, editor of the Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Inquiring Spirit. She is also author of In Pursuit of Coleridge.
T H E A L E X A N D E R The
Alexander
Lectureship
LECTURES
was
founded
in
honour
of
Professor W . J . A l e x a n d e r , w h o h e l d the C h a i r o f E n g l i s h at U n i v e r s i t y C o l l e g e , U n i v e r s i t y o f T o r o n t o , f r o m 1889 to 1926.
The
Lectureship
brings
to
the
university
a
dis-
t i n g u i s h e d s c h o l a r o r c r i t i c to give a course o f lectures o n a subject r e l a t e d to E n g l i s h
literature.
KATHLEEN COBURN
Experience into Thought P E R S P E C T I V E S IN T H E COLERIDGE NOTEBOOKS
U N I V E R S I T Y Toronto
O F T O R O N T O Buffalo
London
P R E S S
© University of Toronto Press 1979 Toronto
Buffalo
London
Printed in Canada
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Coburn, Kathleen. Experience into thought. ( T h e A l e x a n d e r lectures) I n c l u d e s b i b l i o g r a p h i c a l references a n d i n d e x . 1. C o l e r i d g e , S a m u e l T a y l o r , 1772 - 1834. N o t e b o o k s .
2. C o l e r i d g e , S a m u e l T a y l o r , 1772 - 1834 - C r i t i c i s m a n d interpretation.
I. T i t l e . II. S e r i e s : T o r o n t o . U n i v e r s i t y .
A l e x a n d e r F o u n d a t i o n . T h e A l e x a n d e r lectures. PR4483. A393C58
821'. 7
I S B N 0-8020-5449-8
78-32099
This book has been published with the help of grants from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the Publications Fund of University of Toronto Press.
T o the m e m o r y o f P E L H A M
EDGAR
and GEORGE
SIDNEY
BRETT
t w o teachers w i t h creative i m a g i n a t i o n
This page intentionally left blank
CONTENTS
Abbreviations xi Lecture O n e 1 Lecture T w o 27 Lecture Three 55 Index 87
This page intentionally left blank
Mr.
C o l e r i d g e talks of himself without b e i n g a n egotist, for
in h i m the i n d i v i d u a l is always m e r g e d i n the abstract a n d
general.
Hazlitt
W h e n I got there, the o r g a n was p l a y i n g the 1 0 0 t h psalm a n d , w h e n it was done, M r . C o l e r i d g e rose a n d gave out his text, 'And
he went u p into the m o u n t a i n to pray, H I M S E L F , A L O N E . '
As he gave out his text, his voice 'rose like a steam o f r i c h dis
tilled perfumes,' a n d w h e n he c a m e to the two last words, w h i c h
he p r o n o u n c e d loud, deep, a n d distinct, it seemed to me, w h o
was then y o u n g , as if the sounds h a d echoed from the b o t t o m
of the h u m a n heart, a n d as if that p r a y e r m i g h t have floated in solemn silence t h r o u g h the universe. Hazlitt
This page intentionally left blank
ABBREVIATIONS
CC
The Collected Works of S. T
Coleridge
( B o l l i n g e n Series L X X V L o n d o n a n d P r i n c e t o n 1969-) CL
Coleridge e d E . L .
Collected Letters of Samuel Taylor
G r i g g s ( O x f o r d a n d N e w Y o r k 1956) CN
ed
The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Kathleen Coburn (New York and L o n d o n 1 9 5 7 - ) . References to p u b l i s h e d n o t e b o o k entries are b y serial n u m b e r , entries by notebook EHC
unpublished
number.
E r n e s t H a r t l e y C o l e r i d g e (1846-1920)
Samuel
Taylor Coleridge's grandson Friend
(CC)
The Friend e d B a r b a r a E . R o o k e : The Works of S. T
Collected
Coleridge (2 v o l s B o l l i n g e n
S e r i e s L X X V L o n d o n a n d P r i n c e t o n 1969)
HNC
H e n r y N e l s o n C o l e r i d g e (1798-1843)
Samuel
Taylor Coleridge's nephew and son-in-law IS
Inquiring
Spirit:
A New Presentation
from His Published
and Unpublished
of
Coleridge
Prose
Writings
e d K a t h l e e n C o b u r n ( r e v i s e d e d T o r o n t o 1979) PL
The Philosophical
Lectures of Samuel
Taylor
Coleridge e d K a t h l e e n C o b u r n ( L o n d o n a n d New SM
(CC)
Y o r k 1949)
The Statesman's Manual
e d R J . W h i t e : The
ted Works of S. T Coleridge ( B o l l i n g e n S e r i e s STC
L X X V L o n d o n a n d P r i n c e t o n 1972) S a m u e l T a y l o r C o l e r i d g e (1772-1834)
Collec
This page intentionally left blank
LECTURE ONE
This page intentionally left blank
LECTURE ONE
I
T IS A C O M M O N D E L U S I O N t h a t C o l e r i d g e is w e l l - k n o w n . ' T h a t w a s s a i d i n t h e 1850s i n C a m b r i d g e , C o l e r i d g e ' s o w n
university, by F . J . A . H o r t . T h o u g h C o l e r i d g e was always m u c h cited, quoted, a n d either honoured or reviled, Hort's d i c t u m a b o u t h i m a n d h i s p u b l i c is s t i l l t o d a y a l m o s t as t r u e as it w a s t h e n , b u t n o t q u i t e . T h e v e r y i n v i t a t i o n t o l e c t u r e o n 1
h i m i n t h i s d i s t i n g u i s h e d series is e v i d e n c e o f a c h a n g e s i n c e the 1930s w h e n b o t h i n this u n i v e r s i t y a n d i n O x f o r d
the
a u t h o r i t i e s t r i e d t o d i s s u a d e m e f r o m s t u d y i n g C o l e r i d g e as a thinker, a n d to t u r n m y post-graduate w o r k t o w a r d s W o r d s w o r t h ; there were n o supervisors r e a d y to consider C o l e r i d g e a serious subject i n himself. N o r w e r e they p e c u l i a r i n this. T h e situation was the same almost everywhere. Y e t G . S . Brett and P e l h a m E d g a r h a d aroused m y curiosity about Coleridge first
as a p h i l o s o p h e r a n d c r i t i c . I g r a t e f u l l y t a k e t h i s o p p o r -
t u n i t y o n h o m e g r o u n d to r e c o r d m y debt to t h e m . W h e n I asked m y friend B a r k e r Fairley w h a t I should speak a b o u t i n these lectures, he s a i d , ' T e l l w h a t interests y o u i n C o l e r i d g e . ' O t h e r s less p o l i t e l y h a v e s o m e t i m e s
asked,
' H o w o n e a r t h h a v e y o u s t o o d h i m a l l these years?' I n fact, I h a v e b e e n i n c r e a s i n g l y i n t e r e s t e d t o
find
Cole-
r i d g e a person a n d t h i n k e r v e r y different f r o m the h i s t o r i c a l and p u b l i c impression o f h i m - m o r e lonely, m o r e rebellious, more
sceptical, m u c h w i d e r i n range,
and
more
deeply
human. C o l e r i d g e w a s b o r n i n 1 7 7 2 , a n d a l l h i s life r e b e l l e d i n a 1 In October 1975,1 noticed one of the candidates in a BBC quiz chose as his special subject, ' T h e Life and Works of S.T. Coleridge.' A n d in the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in J u l y 1977, of 400 shows Coleridge was the inspiration for two - a new play by Leonard M a g u i r e and a dancemime interpretation of the Ancient
Mariner.
m u l t i t u d e o f ways, but especially against the n a r r o w r a t i o n a l i s m o f t h e e i g h t e e n t h c e n t u r y , ' t h i s e n l i g h t e n e d c e n t u r y ' as h e scoffingly c a l l e d it, i n t o w h i c h he w a s b o r n . L i k e most rebels he also p a r t o o k o f the mother's m i l k he rejected, a n d never
free
o f the
inevitable conflicts a n d
was
inconsistencies.
T h e r e are therefore m a n y C o l e r i d g e s . I f I m a y assume
(as
C o l e r i d g e i n m y place w o u l d have done) that m y books are largely unread, little
list
perhaps I m a y risk repetition i n g i v i n g a
o f the
various dynamos
that
go b y the
name
'Coleridge.' F i r s t the poet (but k n o w n chiefly for o n l y three m i r a c u l o u s p o e m s a n d a b o u t three others); t h e n the l i t e r a r y critic, w i t h o u t w h o m t h e h i s t o r y o f E n g l i s h l i t e r a r y c r i t i c i s m as w e k n o w i t is i n c o n c e i v a b l e ; t h e c r i t i c o f s c i e n c e , t h e 'so-so c h e m i s t ' as he c a l l e d himself, whose role i n s h a r i n g the struggle o f D a v y a n d others o v e r the concepts a n d t e r m i n o l o g y o f m o d e r n c h e m i s t r y a n d b i o l o g y is j u s t b e g i n n i n g t o b e a p p r e c i a t e d ; t h e l o g i c i a n , w h o s e h i t h e r t o u n p u b l i s h e d Logic, e d i t e d b y P r o f e s s o r R o b i n J a c k s o n , is i n t h e h a n d s o f t h e p r i n t e r s ; t h e j o u r n a l 2
ist, t h e t o p l e a d e r - w r i t e r o f h i s d a y i n t h e Morning Post a n d t h e Courier, w h o s e t h r e e v o l u m e s o f n e w s p a p e r c o n t r i b u t i o n s w i l l reappear any day now;
3
the social a n d p o l i t i c a l critic, w h o
w r o t e t h e first a n a l y s i s i n E n g l i s h o f a p o s t - w a r e c o n o m i c depression
at
the
close o f the
N a p o l e o n i c wars,
a
work
a d m i r e d b y M a y n a r d K e y n e s ; the psychologist, w h o grasped t h e n o t i o n o f a s u b c o n s c i o u s m e n t a l life a n d o f v a r y i n g l e v e l s o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s , w h o c o i n e d t h e w o r d s psycho-analytical*
and
psycho-somatic
(as w e l l as h u n d r e d s o f o t h e r w o r d s n o w i n o u r
dictionaries),
who
5
dreams;
anticipated
2 To be published Autumn 1979 3 Published in 1978 4 CATH2670 5
the
twentieth
century
on
the educationist, w h o believed i n c u l t i v a t i n g the
/S§52
4
initiative i n c h i l d r e n a n d attacked the c o n v e n t i o n a l negative controls b y p u n i s h m e n t ; i n theology the ' h i g h e r critic,' w h o p l o u g h e d m e t h o d i c a l l y t h r o u g h dozens o f the heavy G e r m a n volumes of E i c h h o r n , Michaelis, a n d their ilk, a n d advocated a n h i s t o r i c a l a p p r o a c h to J u d a i s m a n d C h r i s t i a n i t y , d e n o u n c i n g w h a t he c a l l e d the 'superstitious' r e a d i n g o f the S c r i p tures; a n d o n e o f the m o s t i n f l u e n t i a l o f a l l C o l e r i d g e s , the a n a l y s t o f t h e c h u r c h as b o t h a s p i r i t u a l a n d a
temporal
society, a n d o f the o b l i g a t i o n s o f b o t h c h u r c h a n d state to the n a t i o n a l c u l t u r e ; a n d t h e r e is C o l e r i d g e t h e E n g l i s h m a n w h o was a determined
' c o s m o p o l i t e ' (to use a n o t h e r
word
he
c o i n e d ) , w h o d r e w u p a p l a n for a league o f n a t i o n s ( a d m i t tedly w i t h a proviso - a l t h o u g h the N a p o l e o n i c wars over-that
no
Frenchman
be
a l l o w e d to
settle
were
outside
F r a n c e o r h e r c o l o n i e s ) . A n d I see I h a d a l m o s t f o r g o t t e n t h e philosopher! Y e t he d e l i v e r e d possibly the
first
course o f
p u b l i c lectures b y a n E n g l i s h m a n o n the history o f that subj e c t - f o r m o n e y (not m u c h m o n e y ) . W h y , I a m often asked, h a v e w e not been m o r e a d e q u a t e l y a w a r e o f these m a n y C o l e r i d g e s ? O n e r e a s o n is t h a t C o l e r i d g e w a s l o n g a g o a p p r o p r i a t e d b y t h e l i t e r a r y a n d - f r e q u e n t l y t h e fate o f p o e t s - w a s t h e r e f o r e c o n s i d e r e d s o m e t h i n g o f a f r e a k i n o t h e r fields. E v e n n o w t h e m o n o g r a p h s i s s u i n g f r o m E n g l i s h d e p a r t m e n t s o n h i m as p o e t a n d l i t e r a r y c r i t i c f a r e x c e e d i n n u m b e r a l l t h e rest, c r e a t i n g the i m p r e s s i o n t h a t there lies his c h i e f i m p o r t a n c e . S o m e o f the most l e a r n e d C o l e r i d g i a n s - O w e n B a r f i e l d a n d T h o m a s McFarland
for i n s t a n c e - d o
n o t t h i n k so. W i l f r e d
s a i d , i n h i s h i s t o r y o f t h e Morning
Hindle
Post, t h a t t h e b e s t m e m o r i a l
t h a t c o u l d be raised to C o l e r i d g e w o u l d be the r e p u b l i c a t i o n o f his c o n t r i b u t i o n s to t h a t paper;
i n a survey of E n g l i s h
religious o p i n i o n i n the nineteenth century B e r n a r d R e a r d o n s a i d o f h i s p r e - e m i n e n c e as a r e l i g i o u s t h i n k e r , ' v i r t u a l l y a l l o f his i m m e d i a t e B r i t i s h c o n t e m p o r a r i e s 5
seem to b e l o n g to a
different [ a n d b y i m p l i c a t i o n , inferior] i n t e l l e c t u a l w o r l d . '
6
A s l o n g a g o as 1 9 2 9 J o s e p h N e e d h a m i n a v o l u m e o f essays e n t i t l e d The Sceptical Biologist w a s m o v e d t o w r i t e o n e o f t h e t e n essays o n ' C o l e r i d g e as a P h i l o s o p h i c B i o l o g i s t ' a n d w h i l e he gives a g r a d e o f a b o u t a B p l u s to C o l e r i d g e he credits h i m as b i o l o g i s t w i t h s o m e p r o f u n d i t y i n h i s a t t a c k s o n c o n t e m p o r a r y s c i e n c e a n d its l o g i c , a n d w i t h h a v i n g a n t i c i p a t e d i n a general w a y the i d e a o f emergent e v o l u t i o n . W i l l i a m W a l s h sees C o l e r i d g e ' s c h i e f c o n t r i b u t i o n t o h i s o w n a n d m o r e r e c e n t t i m e s as l y i n g i n h i s w r i t i n g s o n e d u c a t i o n a n d t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f h i s g e n e r a l v i e w s i n t h a t field. T h e r e a r e m a n y s u c h s p e c i a l ist t r e a t m e n t s o f C o l e r i d g e - b u t v e r y f e w a t t e m p t s t o see t h e broader picture.
W e a r e a l l i m p r e s s e d w i t h Coleridge's
7
Var
iety* b u t w h o h a s c o p e d w i t h t h a t v a r i e t y ? T h e f a u l t m a y l i e i n o u r s e l v e s , b u t i t l i e s a t l e a s t p a r t l y i n C o l e r i d g e ' s stars. W h e n h e d i e d i n 1 8 3 4 at t h e a g e o f s i x t y - t w o h e left t o h i s executors, the s u r g e o n J o s e p h H e n r y G r e e n , his s o n - i n - l a w a n d n e p h e w H e n r y N e l s o n C o l e r i d g e , a n d his son D e r w e n t , a vast chaos o f m a n u s c r i p t s ; m a n y m o r e h a d been
scattered
c a s u a l l y to the w i n d s i n the c h a n c y possession o f friends a n d relations. T h e r e were some seventy notebooks, about eight hundred
a n n o t a t e d b o o k s ( s o m e h e a v i l y so) a n d s h o a l s o f
sibylline
leaves
detached
from
any
mooring
whatsoever,
together w i t h c e r t a i n v o l u m e s o f m a n u s c r i p t s k n o w n to be parts o f projected works (either i n Coleridge's h o l o g r a p h o r d i c t a t e d b y h i m to v a r i o u s a m a n u e n s e s ) . M r G r e e n w a s to p r e p a r e for p u b l i c a t i o n the p h i l o s o p h i c a l remains, the R e v e r e n d D e r w e n t the theological, a n d H e n r y N e l s o n C o l e r i d g e 6 From Coleridge to Gore (1971) 72 7 Yet see Gordon Mackenzie Organic Unity in Coleridge (1939); Richard Haven Patterns of Consciousness (1969); Owen Barfield What Coleridge Thought (1971).
8 T h e title of a collection of bicentenary lectures in Cambridge in 1972 edited by J o h n Beer 6
t h e l i t e r a r y m a t e r i a l s - a n d so r i g h t t h e r e t h e d i v i d i n g u p o f Coleridge into departments
began.
I n t h e first t h r e e y e a r s o f t h e i r l a b o u r s t w o e v e n t s t o o k p l a c e w h i c h i n f l u e n c e d t h e i r d e c i s i o n s . T h e first n o w s e e m s u n i m portant
enough,
but
not to t h e m . I n 1837 J o s e p h C o t t l e
p u b l i s h e d h i s Early Recollections Chiefly Relating
to the Late S. T.
Coleridge. T h i s b e n e f a c t o r o f t h e y o u n g C o l e r i d g e a n d W o r d s -
w o r t h a n d S o u t h e y , w h o s e r e a l c l a i m to fame p u b l i s h e d t h e Lyrical
Ballads,
is t h a t
he
was a generous but v a i n a n d
i l l - e d u c a t e d m a n . H e g l o w e d i n the s t i m u l a t i n g c o m p a n y o f the y o u n g poets, b u t p e r h a p s l a t e r t o o k s o m e k i n d o f v e n g e a n c e for t h e i r ( h a r d l y c o n c e a l e d ) j o k e s at his expense. ( E . g . C o l e r i d g e : 'strange there are no female philosophers.' Cottle: 'what about M o l l Branche?') Possibly Cottle, h a v i n g picked some w i n n e r s , w a s just u s i n g his m e m o i r s to g a t h e r i n the r e t u r n s o n h i s bets. H o w e v e r i t w a s , h e s p i l l e d g a r r u l o u s l y i n p r i n t the tale o f w h a t he c a l l e d , w i t h t y p i c a l i n a c c u r a c y , C o l e r i d g e ' s ' u n h a p p y passion for O p i u m . ' T h e n , a
decade
l a t e r , as a r e s u l t o f t h e e n s u i n g f e u d , h e p o u r e d s a l t o n t h e s c r a t c h e s , p u b l i s h i n g i n 1 8 4 7 h i s Reminiscences of Coleridge
and
Southey. T h a t C o t t l e a l s o s a i d C o l e r i d g e ' s ' f r a n t i c p a s s i o n f o r o p i u m w a s e v e n t u a l l y o v e r c o m e ' d i d n o t m i t i g a t e his crassness i n t h e eyes o f t h e first f a m i l y e d i t o r s . H e m a d e t h e m n o t o n l y cautious b u t defensive a n d selective. T h e second event, V i c t o r i a ' s ascent to the t h r o n e i n 1837, m e a n t t h a t t h e i r task c o i n c i d e d w i t h the onset o f the V i c t o r i a n v i r t u e s . S T C , o r U n c l e S a m , as t h e y c a l l e d h i m , t h e b e s t k n o w n a n d most conspicuously b r i l l i a n t m e m b e r o f the f a m i l y , h a d t o b e p r e s e n t e d t o t h e p u b l i c i n as r e s p e c t a b l e a l i g h t as p o s s i b l e . M a n y Wilberforce, decades
for
highly regarded citizens took o p i u m instance.
b e e n n o secret
-
Coleridge's addiction had
for
to his w i d e circle o f friends,
but
C o t t l e ' s r e v e l a t i o n s o m e h o w b e s m i r c h e d h i m i n p r i n t . A n d as C o t t l e the benefactor m a d e clear, C o l e r i d g e a n d 7
Southey
w o r e the a d d i t i o n a l disgrace o f h a v i n g been penniless radicals i n y o u t h , even t h o u g h S o u t h e y was n o w the poet laureate a n d C o l e r i d g e i n t h e l a t e r y e a r s o f h i s life h a d b e e n s o u g h t o u t b y the most respectable
visitors f r o m a l l o v e r the w o r l d .
No
w o n d e r the e d i t i n g o f the m a n u s c r i p t materials, to w h i c h the f a m i l y h a d f u l l access, p r e s e n t e d p r o b l e m s o f s e l e c t i o n w h i c h t h e y s o l v e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r V i c t o r i a n tastes. C o l e r i d g e h a d a l w a y s been a blot o n the f a m i l y escutcheon. T h e y w o u l d n o w w h i t e n his r e p u t a t i o n to m a t c h the s i l v e r y l o c k s o f the O r a c l e of Highgate. S o t h e first w o r k p r o d u c e d a f t e r C o l e r i d g e ' s d e a t h - a p a r t f r o m t h e 1 8 3 4 Poems e v e n t h e n i n t h e p r e s s - w a s t h e Talk
Table
(1835). H N C h a d the w i t to m a k e h i m s e l f his u n c l e ' s
B o s w e l l , b u t C o l e r i d g e ' s elder son, H a r t l e y , protested o n p u b l i c a t i o n t h a t h i s f a t h e r h a d b e e n m o r e l i b e r a l , n o t so H i g h C h u r c h a n d T o r y as t h e Table Talk m a d e h i m . C r a b b R o b i n -
s o n a l s o c o m p l a i n e d a g a i n s t it t h a t S T C h a d a l w a y s d i s t i n g u i s h e d b e t w e e n goodiness a n d goodness, a n d t h a t H N C h a d
m a d e h i m ' a g o o d y m a n . ' I t is n o t n e c e s s a r y f o r m e t o r e c i t e t h e w h o l e s t o r y o f t h e e a r l y e d i t i n g , b u t suffice it t o s a y t h a t t h e e d i t o r s ' s e l e c t i o n s w e r e m a d e a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r tastes a n d times, a n d i n general were unconsciously distorted i n the direction o f m a i n t a i n i n g the family views. S a r a C o l e r i d g e ('the m o s t b e a u t i f u l a n d the m o s t l e a r n e d w o m a n o f h e r d a y ' it w a s said) s h a r e d w i t h h e r f a t h e r a taste a n d a r e p u t a t i o n for o b s c u r e e r u d i t i o n a n d she w o u l d h a v e f o u n d i t n a t u r a l t o stress t h a t r e p u t a t i o n . N o d o u b t t h e y d i d n o t a l w a y s g r a s p the
scope
o f some
of Coleridge's more
far-sighted
and
c o m p r e h e n s i v e o b s e r v a t i o n s - n o t e v e n S a r a , the best o f the ???????????????? ??????? ? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? o f his insights especially i n p s y c h o l o g i c a l matters. M u c h o f the best, m o s t l i v e l y , a n d m o s t o r i g i n a l m a t e r i a l w a s left u n p u b lished. E v e n w h e n some o f it was p r i n t e d , i n the four v o l u m e s o f Literary
Remains f o r i n s t a n c e ( u n d e r t h a t m o r g u e - l i k e t i t l e ) , 8
somehow, b y little touchings-up, the fragments, m a r g i n a l i a , a n d l e c t u r e notes lost i n the process s o m e o f the c r a c k l e a n d flash o f t h e i r l i g h t n i n g . F r o m o n e c a u s e o r a n o t h e r t h e i m p r e s sion o f C o l e r i d g e was the o l d P e a c o c k i a n v i e w that saw h i m l i v i n g i n M r Flosky's clouds r a t h e r t h a n i n the real w o r l d .
9
In
the t w e n t i e t h century, o n the other h a n d , L o w e s , C e c i l B a l d , Herbert R e a d , H u m p h r y House, J o h n Bayley, L A . Richards, L.C.
K n i g h t s - t o r e f e r t o t h e e l d e r s o n l y - a l l stress C o l e -
r i d g e ' s gift f o r p r e c i s i o n a n d see h i s m e t h o d as r o o t e d i n t h e specific p e r c e i v e d w o r l d . O n e m u s t be c h a r y h o w e v e r i n c r i t i c i z i n g b y h i n d s i g h t these e a r l y a t t e m p t s at p u t t i n g a g i a n t w i t h
seven-league
boots w i t h i n the confines o f p r i n t a n d book covers. ( F o r one t h i n g , one's o w n t u r n w i l l come!) T h e early editors h a d a f o r m i d a b l e , irrepressible p o l y m a t h to p u t i n o r d e r ; t h e i r assid u i t y a n d d e v o t i o n w e r e as e n e r g e t i c as t h e i r c i r c u m s t a n c e s ( a n d healths) a l l o w e d . B u t J o h n Stuart M i l l said r i g h t l y , i n 1840,
the m o o d o f the t i m e was not r e a d y for C o l e r i d g e .
M i l l w r o t e o n e o f t h e b e t t e r e a r l y essays o n C o l e r i d g e , b u t h e w a s g r e a t l y i n f l u e n c e d b y H N C ' s r e v i e w o f t h e 1 8 3 4 Poems i n the
Quarterly
Review
(to a l l i n t e n t s
a n d purposes
his o w n
e d i t i o n w h e n C o l e r i d g e w a s a t d e a t h ' s d o o r ) a n d so e v e n M i l l w a s t a k e n i n b y H N C ' s T o r y e m p h a s i s . It is i n f a c t a m a r k o f M i l l ' s b r i l l i a n c e ( a n d C o l e r i d g e ' s power) that C o l e r i d g e the i n q u i r e r s t a n d s so h i g h i n M i l l ' s e s t i m a t e . W e m u s t r e g a r d t h e p r e j u d i c e s o f t h e f a m i l y e d i t o r s as a w a r n i n g t o o u r s e l v e s , b u t a l s o as a n e x p l a n a t i o n o f w h y , m o r e t h a n a h u n d r e d y e a r s o n , t h e r e is a p a r t i c u l a r n e e d o f a n e w C o l e r i d g e . T h e C o l e r i d g e o f the notebooks, the m a r g i n a l i a , m a n y m a n u s c r i p t
fragments,
the u n p u b l i s h e d 'opus m a x i m u m ' a n d m a n y other u n k n o w n s ,
9 There was a short period of fresh interest, near the turn of the century,
around the publication of the Letters and Anima Poetae by Coleridge's
grandson. Walter Pater, e.g., was aware of Coleridge's unusual sensibility. 9
is a s t r o n g e r C o l e r i d g e . E v e n s o m e p r o s e w o r k s l o n g i n p r i n t , a n d some o f the poems, w i l l take o n a different l i g h t w h e n seen t h e n e w p e r s p e c t i v e . T h e Collected Works s p o n s o r e d b y
in
Bollingen
Foundation will
r u n to m o r e t h a n
twenty-five
v o l u m e s , n o t c o u n t i n g t h e five v o l u m e s o f Notebooks. B u t t h e n Coleridge himself said that each generation must rediscover the poets anew. T o justify the adjective 'stronger' I o n c e t h o u g h t to r e p l y at this p o i n t to the t w o c o m m o n attacks o n C o l e r i d g e , r e v i v e d quite recently - o p i u m addiction a n d plagiarisms from
the
G e r m a n s . B u t I r e m e m b e r e d a n o t e b o o k e n t r y t h a t fits t h e case, i n w h i c h C o l e r i d g e q u o t e s B l u m e n b a c h as s a y i n g o f t h e attacks o f a m e d i c a l adversary, ' M u l t u m hie veri, m u l t u m n o v i ; s e d q u o d est v e r u m , n o n n o v u m est, q u o d est n o v u m non
v e r u m est.' ( M u c h h e r e is t r u e , m u c h n e w , b u t w h a t is
t r u e is n o t n e w a n d w h a t is n e w is n o t t r u e . ) N o . A n y o n e w h o has l i v e d his w a y t h r o u g h the m a r g i n a l i a a n d the notebooks, e s p e c i a l l y , b u t t h e p u b l i s h e d w o r k s as w e l l , w i l l b e t h e l a s t t o cry
'cheat.' F a r m o r e interesting t h a n the pursuit of all the charges a n d
a c c u s a t i o n s , w h e t h e r C o l e r i d g e is v u l n e r a b l e t o t h e m o r n o t , is t o l o o k a t w h a t h e d i d w i t h t h e facts o f h i s e x p e r i e n c e s as h e e n c o u n t e r e d t h e m , i n b o o k s o r o n h i s flesh. I t is n o t C o l e r i d g e the critic, the poet, the p h i l o s o p h e r , the p u b l i c servant, the n e w s p a p e r m a n , the psychologist I w i s h chiefly to present i n these lectures; a l l these m e n , a l l c a l l e d C o l e r i d g e , w i l l a p p e a r i n d i r e c t l y , b u t I w o u l d h a v e y o u see h i s r a r e c a p a c i t y t o experience, to recognize, a n d to p a r t i c i p a t e i n the experiences life b r o u g h t t o h i m a n d h e b r o u g h t t o life. I n t h e n o t e b o o k s and
m a r g i n a l i a he c o m m a n d e d a r e m a r k a b l e a b i l i t y to a r t i c -
u l a t e t h e m . T h e r e is a s p e c i a l q u a l i t y i n h i s c u r i o s i t y , a c e r t a i n toughness o f m i n d , a s c e p t i c i s m i f y o u w i l l , a n d o v e r it a l l his o r i g i n a l ways o f r e l a t i n g one t h o u g h t to another. I n the r e m a i n d e r o f this lecture I s h o u l d like to r e a d some 10
n o t e b o o k e n t r i e s t h a t s h o w t h e e a r l y d e v e l o p m e n t o f a sense o f isolation, c o n t r i b u t i n g to that awareness
of experience i n
w h i c h c e r t a i n creative trends o f consciousness d e v e l o p e d , c e r t a i n a c t i v i t i e s o f m i n d , a n d i n p a r t i c u l a r a n a c u t e sense o f the gap between a p p e a r a n c e s - o n a l l f r o n t s - a n d reality. I n a n outsize 'notebook' called the ' F o l i o N o t e b o o k ' (Coler i d g e is f u l l o f c o n t r a d i c t i o n s ) t h e r e is a n a u t o b i o g r a p h i c a l f r a g m e n t w r i t t e n t w o years before his d e a t h for his friend a n d m e d i c a l adviser J a m e s G i l l m a n . C o l e r i d g e was sixty years old
at
the
time.
The
entry
begins
with
characteristic
particularity. Friday Night, 9 M a r c h 1832 M e m . Capital bronzed Pen from M r Bage's.
C o l e r i d g e h a d g e n e r a l l y used q u i l l pens, often filched for h i m b y C h a r l e s L a m b from the I n d i a H o u s e . T h e r e follows
a
desperate a t t e m p t at o r d e r : Retrospect, fragments of, 1. Early Childhood. T h e last child, the
youngest Child of T e n by the same Mother [and he names them
all]... and the 13th taking in the three Sisters by my dear Father's
first Wife...
T h e youngest Child, possibly inheriting the commencing decay of musculo-arterial Power in my Father who died in his 62nd year when I had not yet reached my 7th... I skip some q u a i n t physiological terms a n d speculations that s h o w h e felt h e w a s t h e r u n t o f t h e l i t t e r . H e t h e n goes o n : A n d certainly, from the Jealousy of old Molly [the nurse] and by the infusions of her Jealousy into my Brother's [Francis's, the next older sibling's] mind, I was in earliest childhood lifted away from the enjoyments of muscular activity - from P l a y - t o take refuge at my 11
mother's side on my little stool, to read my little books and to listen to
the Talk of my E l d e r s - I was driven from Life in Motion to Life in Thought and sensation. I never played except by myself, and then
only acting over what I had been reading or fancying, or half one,
half the other, with a stick cutting down the Weeds & Nettles, as one
of the Seven Champions of Christendom. Alas! I had all the simplic ity, all the docility of a little Child; but none of the Child's H a b i t s - I
never thought as a Child; never had the language of a Child. N o t e the solitariness, the p a r a n o i a ,
the a c t i n g out o f the
fantasy o f the strong m a n , c h a m p i o n o f the oppressed. I forget whether it was in my 5th or 6th year, but I believe the latter,
in consequence of some quarrel between me and my Brother, it was
in the first week of October, I ran away - from fear of being whipt
and passed the whole night, a night of rain and storm, on the bleak
side of a H i l l on the River Otter, & was found, alive but without the power of my limbs, at day-break about six yards from the naked
banks of the R i v e r - T h e consequence, a remittent, and then a
rheumatic fever -
N o t e that h a l f a c e n t u r y later, the child's l o n g d a r k night o f r u n a w a y m i s e r i e s is s t i l l v i v i d . H e t h e n t e l l s o f his f a t h e r ' s d e a t h o f w h i c h h e h a d p r e m o n i t i o n s t h a t f r i g h t e n e d h i m a n d m a d e h i m feel h a l f - g u i l t y o f i t . He
was then placed i n Christ's H o s p i t a l j u n i o r school. T h e
b l u e u n i f o r m w a s ( a n d s t i l l is) a n o r p h a n a g e c o s t u m e d a t i n g back to the f o u n d a t i o n i n 1552. ... O what a change! -Deprest, moping, friendless poor O r p h a n ,
half-starved (at that time the portion of food given to the Blue-coats
was cruelly insufficient for those who had no friends to supply
them-from 8 to 14 I was a playless Day-dreamer, an Helluo Librorum, my appetite for which was indulged by a singular Inci12
dent, a stranger who struck by my conversation made me free of a [...]
great Circulating Library in King's Street, Cheapside -1 read thro the
whole Catalogue, folios and all - whether I understood them or did
not understand them - running all risks, in skulking out, to get the two Volumes which I was entitled to have daily-Conceive what I must have been at 14-1 had never played-I was in a continued low
fever - my whole Being was with eyes closed to every object of present
sense - to crumple myself up in a sunny Corner, and read, read, read,
- finding myself in Rob. Crusoe's Island, finding a Mountain of Plum
Cake, and eating out a room for myself, and then eating it into the shapes of Chairs & T a b l e s - H u n g e r and F a n c y -
T h e playless d a y d r e a m e r again, u n d e r n o u r i s h e d w i t h food substituting
the
oral
activity
of
excessive
reading-
b e c o m i n g a R o b i n s o n C r u s o e o f t h e m i n d , 'eyes c l o s e d to e v e r y o b j e c t o f sense.' B u t n o t e t h e d a y d r e a m o f making; t h e p l u m - c a k e r o o m h a d tables a n d chairs, i n the p l u r a l , for sociability. H e confesses t o c l a s s r o o m p r e c o c i o u s n e s s o v e r a n d a b o v e the other boys, a n d b e m o a n s the measureless difference between me and them in the wide, wild wilderness
of useless,
unarranged Book-knowlege, and book-
thoughts... at 14 or at 12 I should have made as pretty a juvenile Prodigy as was ever emasculated & ruined by fond and idle wonder ment. Thank Heaven! I was flogged, instead of flattered.
N o t i c e his awareness o f the lack o f m o t i v a t i o n , to w h i c h he o f t e n r e f e r r e d l a t e r as h i s d i s e a s e d W i l l ; a l s o t h e r e s e r v a t i o n s a b o u t k n o w l e d g e t h a t is ' B o o k - k n o w l e g e , ' a n d t h o u g h t s t h a t are ' B o o k - T h o u g h t s . ' T h e first w e l c o m e e x c i t e m e n t s o f m o t i v a t i o n ( b u t h e r e c o g n i z e s i t as f l e e t i n g ) c a m e w h e n o n S a t u r d a y s h e w a s a l l o w e d t o w a l k the L o n d o n H o s p i t a l w i t h his brother L u k e - a n d was 13
a l l o w e d t o assist a t a b e d s i d e ! S u d d e n l y h e h a d a n a i m , b e g a n to r e a d
everything
medical-English, Latin,
and
Greek-
a n d w h e n t h a t p r o v e d ' a w i l d d r e a m ' his r e a d i n g t u r n e d metaphysics,
sceptical
metaphysics-and
to
theology-Cato's
Letters, Voltaire. I n m y 16th y e a r I h a d m a d e f r i e n d s - a W i d o w L a d y , w h o h a d a S o n , w h o m I as u p p e r B o y h a d protected, took to m e & t a u g h t m e w h a t it was to h a v e a M o t h e r . I l o v e d her as s u c h - s h e h a d three d a u g h t e r s - & I, o f course, fell i n l o v e - & w i t h the e l d e s t - & f r o m this t i m e to m y 19th w h e n I q u i t t e d S c h o o l for Jesus, C a m b r i d g e , was the aera o f poetry & love. N o t e t h a t he fell i n love w i t h the f a m i l y w a r m t h he
had
missed. P o s s i b l y m u c h too m u c h has b e e n r e a d i n t o the failure o f the M a r y E v a n s affair. O n e m u s t p e r h a p s a d d t h a t i f the l o v e w a s as c o m m o n p l a c e as t h e p o e t r y h e w r o t e a t t h e t i m e ( 1 7 8 8 - 9 1 ) o n e c a n e s t i m a t e t h e a f f a i r as p a l l i d . H o w e v e r , h e does describe
this p e r i o d o f p u b e r t y
as b r i n g i n g a
great
c h a n g e for the b e t t e r B u t f r o m the e x u b e r a n c e of m y a n i m a l Spirits, w h e n I h a d burst forth f r o m m y misery & m o p e r y , a n d the indiscretions resulting f r o m these s p i r i t s , - e x gr. s w i m m i n g i n the N e w R i v e r i n m y C l o t h e s & r e m a i n i n g i n t h e m full h a l f the t i m e - f r o m 17 to 18 was passed i n the S i c k W a r d , J a u n d i c e , a n d R h e u m a t i c F e v e r Youth & commencing M a n h o o d W e n t to Jesus [ C o l l e g e C a m b r i d g e ] - for the first t e r m , & as l o n g as M i d d l e t o n was at P e m b r o k e (later B i s h o p o f C a l c u t t a ) r e a d h a r d , got the G r e e k O d e H e m e a n s he w o n a p r i z e for a G r e e k ode o n the slave trade. N o t e the c a p a c i t y for w o r k i f a friend was n e a r by; the c h i e f
14
p o i n t o f l i t e r a r y i n t e r e s t i n t h e G r e e k o d e is C o l e r i d g e ' s p e r s o n a l i d e n t i f i c a t i o n w i t h the slaves. T h e n there was the s t u p i d episode o f letting some tradesm a n f u r n i s h his r o o m s - i n t o t a l i g n o r a n c e o f the
correct
p r o c e d u r e s - a n d g e t t i n g i n t o w h a t felt l i k e v e r y d e e p d e b t . The
g u i l t w a s - as u s u a l w i t h C o l e r i d g e - a b s u r d l y o u t
of
p r o p o r t i o n t o t h e d e e d , a n d as h e says h e became miserable - d r a n k b a d w i n e - & v o l u n t e e r e d the credit o f vices o f w h i c h I was not g u i l t y - A d r e a r y t i m e o f self-reproach, a n d b e w i l d e r m e n t f o l l o w e d . . . i n the a g i t a t i o n o f m i n d & its consequences m y C o n s t i t u t i o n assuredly was arrested i n its efforts to establish itself. H e passes o v e r t h e e p i s o d e o f t h e f l i g h t f r o m C a m b r i d g e t o t h e L i g h t D r a g o o n s , a n d so m a y w e - e x c e p t t o a d d t h a t o n e o f the most p r o l o n g e d h a u n t i n g s t h a t c a m e out o f it was that he was e x t r i c a t e d f r o m the m i l i t a r y b y his f a m i l y o n g r o u n d s o f insanity. It was a f a c e - s a v i n g d e v i c e for o f f i c i a l d o m a n d the f a m i l y p r e f e r r e d t o t h i n k o f h i m as ' m a d ' r a t h e r t h a n ' b a d . ' B u t t h a t f e a r o f i n s a n i t y n e v e r left h i m . T h e r e are b u t few lines m o r e o f this a u t o b i o g r a p h y , chief further
comments
the
b e i n g o n his ' d o m e s t i c s o r r o w &
u n q u i e t , ' a fine e u p h e m i s m f o r h i s c r u e l l y u n l u c k y m a r r i a g e , a n d t h e n o n his i l l h e a l t h a n d the o p i u m - t a k i n g . Subject to b o w e l c o m p l a i n t s - a m o n g the least, uneasiness o f m i n d was not felt i n the m i n d but i n the lesser bowels, o r a b o v e the r e g i o n of the h e a r t - A t last, m y knees b e g a n to s w e l l - & for some m o n t h s after m y r e t u r n f r o m G e r m a n y & m y establishment at G r e t a H a l l , K e s w i c k , I h a d been a l l but b e d - r i d d e n ; w h e n m y o l d taste r e t u r n i n g , for the study o f m e d i c a l works, h a v i n g b o r r o w e d a l o a d o f o l d M e d i c a l Journals from m y M e d i c a l Attendant, M r Edmonson, I
15
found - i.e. I fancied I found a case precisely like my own - in
which a marvellous cure had been effected by rubbing in laudanum,
at the same time that a dose was administered i n w a r d l y - / I tried it-It answered like a c h a r m / i n a day I was alive-all
alive!-
Wretched Delusion! - but I owe it in justice to myself to declare before G o d , that this-the curse and slavery of my life, did not
commence in any low craving for sensation, in any desire or wish to
stimulate or exhilarate myself- in fact, my nervous spirits and my
mental activity was such as never required i t - b u t wholly in rash
ness, and delusion, and presumptuous Quackery, and afterwards in
pure terror -not
lured, but goaded!-Bad enough as it
is-God
forgive me-the Penance has been most bitter-. [Folio Notebook]
G i l l m a n k n e w a l l t h e rest, t o o w e l l . N o r is i t m y i n t e n t i o n t o inflict o n y o u m u c h m o r e o f that biographical-psychological a p p r o a c h o f w h i c h O w e n B a r f i e l d c o m p l a i n s , rightly, t h a t it c a n b e c o m e a substitute for t r y i n g to u n d e r s t a n d w h a t C o l e ridge k n e w a n d thought. H o w e v e r , one can perhaps advantageously i n the notebooks grasp i n context w h a t was a n d was not k n o w l e d g e t o C o l e r i d g e , w h a t w a s b o o k - k n o w l e d g e a n d w h a t were book-thoughts, real knowledge a n d real thoughts. I n other w o r d s w e d o also need to look closely at his o w n a n a l y s i s o f h i s ' m o d e o f b e c o m i n g ' if, as h e s a i d i n t h e l a s t c h a p t e r o f Biographia
Liter aria,
w e k n o w only ' b y the act o f
becoming.' C o l e r i d g e ' s ' m o d e o f b e c o m i n g ' has far too often
been
t r a c e d s o l e l y t o h i s r e a d i n g . I f t h e Notebooks as p r i n t e d h a v e d i s t o r t e d f u r t h e r t h e i m p r e s s i o n o f C o l e r i d g e as ' a n
Helluo
LibrorunC - h i s o w n n i c k n a m e s f o r h i m s e l f h a d a w a y o f s t i c k i n g a n d t h e y w e r e a l m o s t a l l p e j o r a t i v e - p e r h a p s these lectures give m e the o p p o r t u n i t y to p u t the e m p h a s i s right. F o r it is m y m a i n c o n c e r n h e r e t o s h o w t h a t C o l e r i d g e experienced w h a t h e t h o u g h t a n d thought o n l y w h a t h e e x p e r i e n c e d . W h e n h e m e t h i s o w n t h o u g h t o r a s i m i l a r e x p e r i e n c e i n a b o o k , as i n 16
a f r i e n d , h e j u m p e d f o r j o y . I n r e a d i n g as i n e x p e r i e n c i n g h i s w a s t h e g r e a t a r t o f r e c o g n i t i o n , a s u r p r i s i n g l y r a r e gift t h a t goes w i t h a c u t e l o g i c a l i t y . The
autobiographical entry makes evident Coleridge's
o w n a w a r e n e s s o f a split i n his c h i l d h o o d e x p e r i e n c e s - at least o n e s p l i t . O n t h e o n e h a n d t h e r e w a s t h e sense o f t h e o u t e r h u m a n w o r l d , largely painful, a n d v e r y l o n e l y - to the p o i n t o f d e p r i v i n g h i m o f m a n y o f the sheer p h y s i c a l sunshine j o y s o f c h i l d h o o d . O n the other there w e r e the t r a u m a s o f i n n e r states, b o t h p a i n f u l a n d p l e a s a n t , f r o m f a n t a s i e s a n d d a y dreams. H i s o w n a c c o u n t s m a k e i t c l e a r t h a t C o l e r i d g e ' s m e n t a l life i n c h i l d h o o d w a s p r e c o c i o u s , far i n a d v a n c e o f his sensory experiences.
When
those
did
(rarely)
come,
they
were
rapturous: ... I remember, that at eight years old I walked with him (my father)
one winter evening from a farmer's house, a mile from Ottery - & he
told me the names of the stars-and how Jupiter was a thousand
times larger than our world - and that the other twinkling stars were
Suns that had worlds rolling round them - & when I came home, he shewed me how they rolled round - / . I heard him with a profound
delight & admiration; but without the least mixture of wonder or incredulity. For from my early reading of Faery Tales, & Genii & c
& c - my mind had been habituated to the Vast - & I never regarded my
senses in any way as the criteria of my belief ... [CL I 354-5]
B u t t h e n t h e r e c a m e i n h i s s i x t e e n t h y e a r t h e effect o f m a k i n g f r i e n d s f o r t h e first t i m e - ' a b u r s t i n g f o r t h f r o m m i s e r y & mopery'
i n t o the p h y s i c a l w o r l d the sensations o f w h i c h
w e r e a l l t h e m o r e e x u b e r a n t f o r h a v i n g b e e n so l o n g d a m m e d u p , so a c u t e t h a t t o a c o n s c i e n c e p r e - d i s p o s e d t o g u i l t t h e y were almost u n b e a r a b l e . B y the t i m e he was t w e n t y - t w o he w a s w r i t i n g to a f r i e n d : ' I w o u l d t o G o d , t h a t I too possessed 17
the t e n d e r irritableness o f u n h a n d l e d [Punbridled] S e n s i b i l i t y - m i n e is a s e n s i b i l i t y g a n g r e n e d w i t h i n w a r d c o r r u p t i o n a n d 'the keen searching o f the a i r f r o m w i t h o u t ! '
1 0
T h a t t h e stresses o f i n n e r c o n f l i c t d i d n o t d e s t r o y h i m w a s o w i n g i n the m a i n , I believe, to t w o characteristics t h a t h e l p t o m a k e h i m i n t e r e s t i n g n o w , as t h e y d i d t o h i s f r i e n d s i n h i s o w n time. H i s r e b e l l i o n against the i n t e l l e c t u a l c o m p l a c e n c y a n d s o c i a l c o r r u p t i o n o f h i s d a y , h a r d e n e d as t h e s o c i a l ' c a k e o f c u s t o m ' w a s i n t h e s e e m i n g l y e n d l e s s r e i g n o f G e o r g e III, h i s distrust o f the d i s p a r i t y b e t w e e n outer a p p e a r a n c e a n d l i v i n g reality, m a d e h i m a n o r i g i n a l a n d independent critic o f that s o c i e t y o n e v e r y f r o n t . I t is a m i s t a k e t o t h i n k o f C o l e r i d g e as a r e b e l o n l y i n his y o u t h ; he was i n some respects r a d i c a l a l l his life. T h e r a d i c a l i s m o f his C a m b r i d g e d a y s , w i l d l y i d e a l i s t i c a n d u n r e a l i s t i c t h o u g h it m a y h a v e been, p r o b a b l y h e l p e d to stabilize his sanity. It gave a n o v e r - i n t r o s p e c t i v e l a d those saving o u t w a r d thrusts o f m i n d , f r o m s y m p a t h y towards
the
u n c o n f o r m i n g , the martyrs, the unrespected outcasts o f v a r ious hues a n d times. T h e o t h e r , less c o n s p i c u o u s b u t v e r y p o t e n t c h a r a c t e r i s t i c (it h a d its d a r k u n d e r s i d e ) w a s a gift f o r m i n u t e a n d s e a r c h i n g observation, a n intellectual but not m e r e l y cerebral exercise that gave the m e n t a l a n d e m o t i o n a l thrusts i n w a r d a q u a l i t y s u c h as t h e w o r l d h a s s e l d o m s e e n , e v e n a m o n g p o e t s . I t is impossible
to
exaggerate Coleridge's uncertainties
about
h i m s e l f a n d e q u a l l y impossible to u n d e r s t a n d h o w , b y w h a t m e n t a l a n d p h y s i c a l powers he was able, i n the
swirling
waters o f self-doubt o f w h i c h he was the vortex, to m a i n t a i n the degree a n d range o f curiosity, p s y c h o l o g i c a l insight, a n d a p e c u l i a r l y o b j e c t i v e i n t r o s p e c t i o n n e c e s s a r y t o h i m as p o e t ,
10 CLi 62, where the punctuation appears to be misleading: I have substituted a dash for a comma. 18
c r i t i c , a n d p h i l o s o p h e r . W e l o o k a t it n o t as a t a n i n t e r e s t i n g case study, b u t because o u t o f this self-scepticism a n d c r i t i c a l observation Coleridge built a poetry and a philosophy; a n d f r o m it h e r e a c h e d o u t t o o t h e r m i n d s i n w h i c h h e s a w s i m i l a r struggles b e h i n d q u i t e different
achievements.
I t is d i f f i c u l t i n o u r p o s t - F r e u d t i m e s t o c o n c e i v e w h a t it w a s l i k e t w o h u n d r e d years a g o to t h i n k a b o u t m e n t a l a n x i e ties a n d illnesses. D r B a t t i e ' s Treatise on Madness ( 1 7 3 8 ) a n d h i s treatment o f the m e n t a l l y i l l i n asylums a n d ' m a d
houses'
w e r e s t i l l so l i t t l e u n d e r s t o o d f o r d e c a d e s as t o g i v e h i s n a m e , B a t t i e , i n c r u e l p o p u l a r u s a g e , t o h i s p a t i e n t s . W h a t d i d it mean
then
to i n q u i r e ' h o w m u c h
C o n s c i o u s n e s s ' (CJVI
lies below [ m a n ' s ] o w n
1554), a c o n c e p t not easily grasped
at
a n y time? Y e t i n 1794 C o l e r i d g e referred to ' d e p t h s o f B e i n g , b e l o w , & r a d i c a t i v e of, a l l C o n s c i o u s n e s s ' (CN inquiries came
out o f his o w n experiences,
I 6). S u c h
i n c l u d i n g the
horrors o f the night. I n the f o l l o w i n g notebook entry C o l e r i d g e is w r i t i n g a b o u t m a r i t a l u n h a p p i n e s s , a n d t h e f r i g h t e n i n g c o m b i n e d effect i n s l e e p o f ' D e s p a i r ' a n d ' H o p e , '
and
' G u i l t . ' S o m e t h i n g a bit like M a c b e t h ' s vision o f B a n q u o ' s ghost, o r H a m l e t ' s o f his father, seems to be present. ... Hence even in dreams of Sleep the Soul never is, because it either
cannot or dare not be, any < O N E > T H I N G ; but lives in approaches -touched by the outgoing pre-existent Ghosts of many feelings-It
feels for ever as a blind man with his protended Staff dimly thro' the
medium of the instrument by which it pushes off, & in the act of repulsion, O for the eloquence ofShakspeare, who alone could feel &
yet know how to embody these conceptions, with as curious a felicity as the thoughts are subtle. As if the finger which I saw with eyes had,
as it were, another finger invisible-Touching me with a ghostly
touch, even while I feared the real Touch from it. What if in certain
cases Touch acted by itself, co-present with vision, yet not coalesc i n g - then I should see the finger as at a distance, and yet feel a finger 19
touching which was nothing but it & yet was not it / the two senses
cannot co-exist without a sense of causation / the touch must be the
effect of that Finger, I see, yet it's not yet near to me, it is it in an imaginary preduplication.
N.B. there is a passage in the second Part of Wallenstein, expressing
not explaining the same feeling-The Spirits of great Events Stride
on before the events - it is in one of the last two or 3 Scenes.
How few would read this Note - nay, any one? / and not think the
writer mad or drunk!
[CNII3215]
T h e richness a n d v a r i e t y o f C o l e r i d g e ' s notes o n sleep a n d d r e a m i n g , as s e e n i n t h e n o t e b o o k s , is a s u b j e c t i n i t s e l f f o r a n e x p e r i e n c e d analyst w i t h the soul o f a poet a n d a w i d e r e a d i n g e q u a l to C o l e r i d g e ' s o w n . N o w o n d e r n o o n e has e x p l o r e d it. O n e c a n s c a r c e l y i m a g i n e w h a t it w a s l i k e to w r i t e o r t h i n k l i k e this a b o u t d r e a m s at a t i m e w h e n d r e a m s w e r e t r e a t e d i n the c o n t e x t o f p r o p h e c y , f o r e b o d i n g , t a b u s , a n d ghosts. A s t o n ishingly prescient
about
what
he c a l l e d 'the afflictions o f
s l e e p , ' C o l e r i d g e s a i d , ' E v e r y D r e a m h a s its s c h e m e , ' t r a s t i n g d r e a m w i t h d e l i r i u m i n t h i s r e s p e c t (CNv).
con-
W h a t are
t h e l i n k s w i t h s u c h f e e l i n g s as fear, t e r r o r , a n d r a g e , h e w o n d e r s (CN III 4 0 4 6 ) . T h e ' D r e a m a t i s P e r s o n a e a r e c o m b i n e d w i t h motives, g e n e r a l l y s u g g e s t e d b y t h e P a s s i o n s ' (CNv).
Again
he compares d r e a m s w i t h n i g h t m a r e a n d w i t h reverie. H e h a d a s s e r t e d t h e d o g m a , h e says, t h a t ' t h e F o r m s & F e e l i n g s o f s l e e p a r e always
the reflections & confused E c h o e s o f o u r
w a k i n g T h o u g h t s & E x p e r i e n c e s ' b u t n o w h e w o n d e r s i f t h i s is so. H e h a s a l s o b e e n c u r i o u s a b o u t t h e l i n k b e t w e e n b o d i l y p a i n , a c r a m p , a n y p h y s i c a l sensation, a n d nightmares;
he
c o n c l u d e s that 'the T e r r o r does not arise out o f a p a i n f u l S e n s a t i o n b u t is i t s e l f a s p e c i f i c s e n s a t i o n ' (CN III 4 0 4 6 ) . H e asks, w h e n c e t h e w e e p i n g a n d s e l f - p i t y i n d r e a m s ? H e is a w a r e o f s e x u a l e l e m e n t s (CN II 2 0 5 5 , 2 6 0 0 ) . A n d h e w o n d e r s w h y c e r t a i n k i n d s o f d r e a m s o f fear a n d a n g e r r e g u l a r l y go b a c k to 20
school days a n d Christ's H o s p i t a l (CJVlI 2613). B u t there are
about three h u n d r e d entries o n dreams a n d sleep, i n w h i c h
the very questions he asks himself point to the slenderness o f
o u r knowledge of o u r inner life.
I t u r n here to some other kinds of self-examination, also
typical. M a n y o f us c a n recognize this one:
If one thought leads to another, so often does it blot out another -
This I find, when having lain musing on my Sopha, a number of interesting Thoughts have suggested themselves, I conquer my bod
ily indolence & rise to record them in these books, alas! my only
Confidants. - T h e first Thought leads me on indeed to new ones; but
nothing but the faint memory of having had them remains of the
others, which had been even more interesting to me. -1 do not know,
whether this be an idiosyncracy, a peculiar disease, of my particular memory-but so it is with m * - M y Thoughts crowd each other to
death. [CN ill 3342]
T h a t was written i n 1808 w h e n C o l e r i d g e was thirty years o l d , and
already,
himself.
H a m l e t - l i k e , a p p l y i n g the
w o r d disease
to
T h r e e years earlier he h a d jotted d o w n a n example of this
form o f forgetfulness:
. . . W h a t is the right, the virtuous Feeling, and consequent action,
when a man having long meditated & perceived a certain T r u t h
finds another & a foreign Writer, who has handled the same with an
approximation to the T r u t h , as he conceived
it? - Joy! - Let T r u t h make her Voice audiblel While I was preparing
the pen to write this remark, I lost the train of Thought which had
led me to it. I meant to have asked something else, now forgotten: for
the above answers itself-it needed no new answer, I trust, in my
Heart. 14 April, 1805-
[CJVu 2546] 21
In fact I suspect the 'train of T h o u g h t ' he lost track o f was i n the observation i m m e d i a t e l y p r e c e d i n g o n the page overleaf!
Saturday Night, A p r i l 14, 1805-In looking at objects of Nature
while I am thinking, as at yonder moon dim-glimmering thro' the dewy window-pane, I seem rather to be seeking, as it were asking, a
symbolical language for something within me that already and
forever exists, than observing any thing new. Even when that latter is the case, yet still I have always an obscure feeling as if that new
phaenomenon were the dim Awaking of a forgotten or hidden T r u t h
of my inner Nature / It is still interesting as a W o r d , a Symbol! It is
Aoyoq, the Creator! [CN II 2546]
T h e active p a r t i c i p a t i n g response to the book of nature is b o t h projective
and
receptive:
inner a n d outer worlds
come
together i n the W o r d , the S y m b o l . Perhaps the d a r i n g a p p l i
cation o f the w o r d L o g o s to himself m a d e h i m d r o p the subject, i n fright.
H e reflects o n the nature o f habit o n w h i c h he h a d once
proposed to write a n essay:
O f Habit - O how miserable this makes me, not only as recalling an evil habit, but as recalling one of its consequences - what glorious,
original Notions I had of this untreated of subject 5 years ago - &
nothing done: - & I understand it less now by far, than I did then -
A l l the dim Analoga of Habit in Inanimate forms [are] either the Effect of some actual alteration in the substance of the thing-ex. gr.
an old V i o l i n as giving a mellower sound than new wood - or act only
defectively, as the rumple in a Leaf of long continuance - None of these seem even to give a decent Simile for the increase (almost
indefinite) of Power by Practice in a vital Being-the muscular
motions of a capital Performress on the Piano Forte, or (O bless the
fair white arms of dear departed L a u r a Montague!) on the Pedal H a r p - & c & c & c . - [CN m 3361]
22
(It w o u l d b e c h e a t i n g t o s p a r e y o u t h e c o m e d y o f s o m e o f Coleridge's sentimental illustrations.) C l e a r l y he k n e w he was b l o c k e d b y his o w n emotions c o n n e c t e d w i t h this subject o f habit. T h e introspective i n i t i a t i v e is p a t e n t l y c l e a r , b u t n o t i c e h o w i t m o v e s o u t w a r d s , t o t h e more objective general question o f the physiology o f habit - a n d h o w d o e s p r a c t i c e i n c r e a s e power - e v e n m u s c u l a r l y ? I f
o n l y h e c o u l d u n d e r s t a n d - and a p p l y t h a t !
T h e sense o f c o n t r a d i c t i o n t h e n , b e t w e e n t h e w o r l d w i t h i n h i m a n d the w o r l d w i t h o u t , w a s there f r o m earliest days a n d seems to h a v e fostered a c a p a c i t y f o r a s k i n g questions t h a t w e n t o n d e v e l o p i n g t h r o u g h o u t h i s life. S o m e t i m e s s i m p l y inquisitive, sometimes rebellious, spontaneous inquiry o f a l l sorts w a s s e c o n d n a t u r e t o C o l e r i d g e ; i t b r o u g h t s o m e k i n d o f f o c u s i n g o f the sensory, the m e n t a l , t h e p h y s i c a l , t h e p e r s o n a l restlessness.
N o t h i n g is t o o m i n u t e o r t r i v i a l ; n o t h i n g t o o
f u n d a m e n t a l o r vast. 1. Feb. 1805. Friday. Malta. O f the Millions that use the Pen, how
many (quere) understand the theory of this simple machine, the
action of the Slit, Etc? -1 confess, ridiculous as it must appear to those
who do understand it, that I have not been able to answer the
question off-hand to myself, having only this moment thought of it. [CNII 2423]
O n e c o l d d a m p M a l t a m o r n i n g i nJ a n u a r y 1805 h a v i n g just recorded that he has been a p p o i n t e d P u b l i c Secretary p r o ???? ?? ???????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?? ??? ?????????? O n a heap of glowing wood embers throw a quantity of large and small Chips and Shavings - & they will all quietly and moulderingly
change into the substance of fire - but apply even the smallest M a t c h with the faintest blue flame and tho' with a thousandfold less Heat it
will set the whole instantly on flame. - A good Simile for sympathy of 23
a predisposed multitude with the courage of some Massaniello [a seventeenth-century Spanish demagogue who led a revolt]-but
physically, what is the reason of this phaenomenon! that flame is ignited vapor says nothing till one knows what it is that ignites vapor.
C a n it be supposed that the tapering blue flame of a match or even of
a bit of phosphorus is more intensef than that of a whole Hearth of glowing Embers?-Is not
some business of affinity
concerned
here / the heat in the flame existing in a state of greater repulsion & therefore more eager to combine with bodies out of itself-
[CNII
2409]
T h e n h e p u t s a f o o t n o t e t o t h e w o r d intense:^ ' a b i t o f p h o s p h o r u s is m o r e i n t e n s e t h a n t h a t o f a w h o l e H e a r t h o f g l o w i n g E m b e r s ? ' s a y i n g to himself, ' Y e s ! t h a n e q u a l space o f embers.' T h e physics o f his a n s w e r m a y be d u b i o u s b u t the q u e s t i o n is t h e t h i n g . T h e p h e n o m e n o n f a s c i n a t e d h i m first as a j u x t a p o s i t i o n o f o p p o s i t e s , t h e n as a s i m i l e f o r m o b p s y c h o l o g y ( t h e demagogue
match
and
the
mass o f embers
ready
to
be
i n f l a m e d ) . B u t f r o m there he takes off a n d pursues the subject o f flame ( t h e t r i a n g u l a r s y m b o l o f h i s p e r s o n a l s e a l is a m o n g o t h e r t h i n g s a flame s y m b o l ) . ' W h a t is i n f l a m m a b i l i t y ? ' h a d b e e n a t h e m e i n H u m p h r y D a v y ' s first c h e m i s t r y l e c t u r e s i n the R o y a l I n s t i t u t i o n i n 1802. H e r e C o l e r i d g e ' s n o t e b o o k question to h i m s e l f comes w i t h a t o u c h o f i r o n y - the single l i t t l e m a t c h a n d t h e w h o l e b e d o f e m b e r s . W h a t is t h e p r i n c i ple here, g o v e r n i n g the r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n bodies?
Affinity?
R e p u l s i o n ? Is t h e p h r a s e , ' a n d t h e r e f o r e m o r e eager t o c o m bine w i t h bodies out o f itself merely a n e x a m p l e o f pathetic f a l l a c y , o r is it a n u n c o n s c i o u s p e r s o n a l m e t a p h o r ? Eager is surely a n emotive w o r d . T h i s is o n e a s p e c t o f w h a t
I m e a n b y suggesting
C o l e r i d g e ' s t h i n k i n g is r o o t e d i n p e r s o n a l e x p e r i e n c e ,
that the
m i n u t i a e as w e l l as t h e w i d e r a r c s . H i s c u r i o s i t y a r i s e s f r o m a
24
combination of mental concentration, observation, a n d
an
i n e x p l i c a b l e p e r s o n a l d r i v e . T h e d i r e c t i o n s it takes are
not
necessarily personal; they m a y w e l l be a n escape f r o m
the
personal, for m u c h o f that f r o m c h i l d h o o d o n w a r d s was p a i n f u l a n d i n t r o s p e c t i v e . Y e t C o l e r i d g e ' s sense o f i s o l a t i o n d i d n o t destroy h i m . It fostered creative a c t i v i t y . It has m o r e t h a n o n c e b e e n s a i d t h a t a m o n g E n g l i s h poets C o l e r i d g e was the great poet o f c h i l d h o o d , a n d o f love. T h a t C o l e r i d g e u n d e r s t o o d these o u t o f p a i n r a t h e r t h a n d i d not b l o c k the d e t a c h m e n t
pleasure
necessary to a r t i c u l a t e
them.
H e is a l s o t h e p o e t o f l o n e l i n e s s , t h e e m o t i o n a l s e t t i n g o f m a n y o f h i s finest p o e m s , i n c l u d i n g t h e g r e a t e s t l y r i c a l b a l l a d o f loneliness i n the l a n g u a g e . H i s l o n e l y c h a r a c t e r s m a y be seen s h a r p l y i n contrast w i t h W o r d s w o r t h ' s solitaries - those m u c h m o r e self-possessed
and harmonious L e e c h Gatherers
Solitary Reapers. Coleridge's Ancient M a r i n e r and
and
Chris-
t a b e l a r e sufferers, i n c o m p l e t e i n t h e i r r e l a t i o n t o life, s e a r c h i n g for someone
to t a l k to. L i k e t h e i r c r e a t o r .
Hence
the
d i a l o g u e , a c t u a l o r i m p l i c i t i n so m a n y o f t h e p o e m s . H e n c e the n e e d (faute de m i e u x ) to m a k e the n o t e b o o k s his c o n f i dants. C o l e r i d g e was l o n e l y because he was a w a r m l y gregarious m a n . A line i n q u o t a t i o n marks, b u r i e d i n a notebook entry, gave m e m a n y a fruitless search. ' I a m n o t a g o d t h a t I s h o u l d s t a n d a l o n e . ' F i n a l l y after a b o u t t w o d e c a d e s o f h u n t i n g , u p m a n y b l i n d a l l e y s , it a p p e a r e d
i n a C o l e r i d g e sale; h e q u o t e d i t
c a s u a l l y i n a m a n u s c r i p t l e t t e r as f r o m a n u n p u b l i s h e d p o e m of his own\ H i s d e e p p e r s o n a l sense o f t h e g o d l i k e a n d u n g o d l i k e i n l o n e l i n e s s r e f i n e d h i s i n s i g h t s , e.g. i n t o
Shakespeare's
t r a g i c h e r o e s as t h e y e n d u r e o r d o n o t e n d u r e t h e i r i s o l a t i o n ; i t is p a r t o f h i s p a i n f u l c r i t i c a l sense o f t h e
i m a g i n a t i o n as
c r e a t o r . T o b e free t o i n i t i a t e i t m u s t b e free e n o u g h t o s t a n d a l o n e . H e h a d n o c o n f i d e n c e t h a t h e h i m s e l f c o u l d d o so, y e t i t
25
is, I b e l i e v e , a n o v e r l o o k e d n o b i l i t y i n C o l e r i d g e - h i s f r a i l t i e s a r e m o r e o b v i o u s - t h a t h e w a s a b l e so o f t e n t o t u r n h i s p e r s o n a l l o n e l i n e s s t o c r e a t i v e use. T h e p o e m s , t h e l i t e r a r y c r i t i cism, the p h i l o s o p h y , a l l were w r e n c h e d out of a c o m p l e x t o t a l experience. F a i l u r e to u n d e r s t a n d
t h i s is f a i l u r e t o
come
a n y w h e r e n e a r the t r u t h a b o u t C o l e r i d g e . T o u n d e r s t a n d it m a k e s most o f the charges against h i m t r i v i a l . T h e basis o f his s t r e n g t h seems to m e to be his awareness o f the difficulties o f r e c o n c i l i n g e v e r y w h e r e those opposites w h i c h he
first
met
w i t h i n himself. I n the s e c o n d l e c t u r e I s h o u l d l i k e to l o o k at s o m e o f the strange paths a l o n g w h i c h Coleridge's curiosity about
and
a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h o t h e r m i n d s t o o k h i m , as f o r e x a m p l e h i s interest i n i m a g i n a t i v e originals like B e h m e n , Paracelsus, a n d B r u n o . I n the t h i r d l e c t u r e I s h a l l say s o m e t h i n g m o r e a b o u t his o w n p o e t i c a n d
p h i l o s o p h i c i m a g i n a t i o n e s p e c i a l l y as
it is e x h i b i t e d i n t h e
notebook-keeper.
26
LECTURE TWO
This page intentionally left blank
LECTURETWO
I
N T H E FIRST L E C T U R E I suggested that the circumstances o f C o l e r i d g e ' s e a r l y life as h e d e s c r i b e d t h e m e n c o u r a g e d i n h i m
the constant q u e s t i o n i n g o f the appearances o f things, a n d a sense o f c o n f l i c t b e t w e e n i n n e r a n d o u t e r w o r l d s . H e b e c a m e , as h e s a i d , a n o d d i t y , a n u n w i l l i n g s o l i t a r y , a g a i n s t t h e g r a i n o f a sociable temper. I t is w e l l k n o w n
that he b e c a m e also one o f the
most
o m n i v o r o u s o f E n g l i s h readers, o n e w i t h a taste for c e r t a i n k i n d s o f e c c e n t r i c s . O r w a s it a taste a n d a s e a r c h for s o m e t h i n g else? C o l e r i d g e w a s n o t a l t o g e t h e r t h e l i t e r a r y D o n Q u i x o t e h e is s o m e t i m e s m a d e o u t t o b e . A s h i s g r a n d s o n E r n e s t H a r t l e y C o l e r i d g e said, ' C o l e r i d g e for a l l his e c c e n t r i c ities w a s t h e sanest o f m o r t a l s . ' I s h o u l d like n o w to e x a m i n e some e x a m p l e s o f his c u r i o u s r e a d i n g a n d the v a r i o u s d r i v e s b e h i n d it w h i c h w e r e m o r e p o s i t i v e a n d l o g i c a l t h a n a m e r e taste for o t h e r s o c i a l rejects s u c h o b s c u r e y e t n o t o r i o u s r e b e l s o f e a r l i e r t i m e s as J a c o b B e h m e n , a n d Bruno, a n d Paracelsus - a n d certain intellectual o d d - m e n - o u t i n his o w n day. Coleridge approached other independent minds keenly alive to their loneliness a n d courage, a n d w i t h
immense
respect for t h e m . I n N o v e m b e r 1803, a s o u l - d e s t r o y i n g t i m e o f self-flagellation, he w r o t e i n N o t e b o o k 2 1 : With a deep groan from the Innermost of my Heart, in the feeling of self-humiliation, & a lively sense of my own weakness, & the distrac tion of my mind, which is indeed 'always doing something else,' I yet write down the names of the Works that I have planned, in the order in which I wish to execute them, with a fervent prayer that I may build up in my Being enough of manly Strength & Perseverence to ?? ??? ????? ?? ? ???? ? ???? ?????
T h e r e f o l l o w s a l i s t o f v a s t w o r k s ; t h e first w a s o n ' M a n , a n d the p r o b a b l e D e s t i n y o f the H u m a n R a c e . ' T h e n i n t h a n d tenth were to be o n ' R e v o l u t i o n a r y M i n d s , T h o m a s A q u i n a s , Scotus, L u t h e r , [ R i c h a r d ] B a x t e r . . . Socinus, G . F o x . . . G i o r d a n o B r u n o , J a c o b B o e h m e n , S p i n o z a . ' T h a t r e s o l u t i o n is succeeded i n the notebook b y another
entry:
It has been long my sincere wish, & (for that all our Habits partake of human Frailty) my pride, to try to understand, in myself, & to make intelligible to others, how great men may err wildly, yet not be
m a d - t h a t a l l opinions that can be understood & are not contra dictory] in terms have more to be said for them than Bigots & Pedants & Sciolists suppose. [CjVl 1647]
' H o w great m e n m a y e r r w i l d l y , yet not be m a d . ' T h o u g h he d i d n o t t h i n k o f h i m s e l f as a g r e a t m a n - ( ' I h a v e a sense o f power
without
strength'
was
a
sincere
and
repeated
confession) - he d i d k n o w w h a t it w a s to ' e r r w i l d l y yet not be m a d , ' a t l e a s t n o t so m a d as b r o t h e r G e o r g e c h o s e t o t h i n k h i m . H e also k n e w t h a t i m a g i n a t i o n was i n his s c h e m e o f t h i n g s a c o n c o m i t a n t o f g e n i u s , b u t so o f t e n s u s p e c t e d o f m a d n e s s t h a t a m a n o f i m a g i n a t i o n h a d to be b r a v e also. O f h i s ' R e v o l u t i o n a r y M i n d s ' i t is h a r d t o s a y w h e t h e r i t w a s their i m a g i n a t i o n o r their temerity he a d m i r e d most. C o l e r i d g e w a s a n e a r l y a p p r e c i a t o r o f the h i s t o r i c a l fact t h a t the i m a g i n a t i o n is s o m e t i m e s p r o p h e t i c , s e i z i n g i n t u i t i v e l y o n truths that science later, w i t h m i g h t i e r a c c u m u l a t i o n s of other k i n d s o f e v i d e n c e , l a b o u r s to b r i n g forth. O n e o f his earliest heroes was J a c o b B o h m e o r B e h m e n , the G e r m a n theosophist shoemaker (1575-1624) whose works i n four large quarto volumes were published i n English translat i o n a b o u t the t i m e o f Coleridge's b i r t h . T h e y were h e a v i l y a n n o t a t e d b y C o l e r i d g e at several r e a d i n g s till n e a r l y the e n d o f h i s life; b u t l o n g b e f o r e h e o b t a i n e d t h e m a n d w h i l e h e w a s 30
still a s c h o o l b o y , he r e a d o r r a t h e r he said, ' c o n j u r e d o v e r
(a
???? ???????????? ???????? ?????????? ???????? ??? ??? ?? the m o r e difficult o f B e h m e n ' s v i s i o n a r y works. N o d o u b t part o f the early a t t r a c t i o n was B e h m e n ' s personal
misfortunes.
Dismissed from
his s h o e m a k i n g
shop
because o f the u n c o n t r o l l e d intensity o f his m y s t i c a l e x p e r i e n ces a n d h e t e r o d o x t e a c h i n g s , h e b e c a m e a w a n d e r i n g j o u r n e y m a n a n d a l t h o u g h q u i t e u n e d u c a t e d was a t t a c k e d b y the o r t h o d o x a u t h o r i t i e s w i t h a v i g o u r a n d r u t h l e s s n e s s as d i f f i c u l t t o c o m p r e h e n d as t h e w r i t i n g s t h a t p r o v o k e d t h e m . B u t to a y o u t h like C o l e r i d g e , a l r e a d y g i v e n to i n n e r e x p l o r a t i o n , and
therefore
w i t h s o m e sense o f a w o r l d o f f a n t a s y
and
s y m b o l , B e h m e n set f o r t h , o f t e n i n h i g h l y p a r a d o x i c a l a p h o r i s m s , a m y s t i c a l v i s i o n o f t h e forces b e h i n d t h e life o f t h e senses. H i s counsel was no doubt
c o m f o r t i n g a n d p a c i f y i n g to a
p r e c o c i o u s adolescent t r o u b l e d b y his o w n conflicts o v e r the discrepancies between outer a n d i n n e r realities. C o n c e n t r a t e o n the i n w a r d , B e h m e n u r g e d , ' l e a r n to d i s t i n g u i s h b e t w e e n t h e T h i n g , a n d t h a t w h i c h is o n l y a n i m a g e t h e r e o f ,
between
t h e s o v e r e i g n t y w h i c h is s u b s t a n t i a l a n d i n t h e i n w a r d g r o u n d o f N a t u r e , a n d t h a t w h i c h is i m a g i n a r y a n d i n o u t w a r d f o r m o f s e m b l a n c e ; b e t w e e n t h a t w h i c h is p r o p e r l y a n g e l i c a l , a n d t h a t w h i c h is n o m o r e t h a n b e s t i a l . '
1
T h e p a s s a g e is t o o c l e a r t o b e t y p i c a l o f B e h m e n , w h o s e confused, i n t e r m i n a b l e , a n d intensely pious arguments
are
b a f f l i n g , t o s a y t h e least, t o t h e p o i n t o f d e s p a i r ; y e t I s a a c Newton,
and W i l l i a m Blake, and
Coleridge were
among
those w h o respected h i m . C o l e r i d g e ' s m a r g i n a l i a h e l p e d m e t o g r a s p t h a t B e h m e n v i e w e d t h e life o f m a n a n d t h e w h o l e cosmos i n one a n d the same pattern. H e n c e the s u d d e n leaps o f t h o u g h t , f r o m one p l a n e to another, the c u r i o u s a l l e g o r i c a l w a y of writing, using strange terms a n d terms w i t h m o r e t h a n 1 Ofthe Supersensual Life Dialogue I 31
o n e m e a n i n g , e.g. S a l i t t e r ( S a l t p e t r e ) , f o r t h e ' d i v i n e P o w e r s ' a n d also for G r a v i t a t i o n . B e h m e n saw the u n i v e r s a l struggle, p h y s i c a l i n t h e u n i v e r s e a n d m o r a l i n m a n , as a between
struggle
the c o n f l i c t i n g forces o f l i g h t a n d darkness,
and
d e s c r i b e d t h e s e forces v a r i o u s l y i n b o t h h u m a n a n d c o s m i c terms: e x p a n s i o n a n d c o n t r a c t i o n , centrifugal a n d c e n t r i p e t a l , r e p u l s i o n a n d a t t r a c t i o n , the astringent q u a l i t y a n d the sweet q u a l i t y , the destructive a n d the constructive, h u m i l i t y a n d p r i d e , a n g u i s h a n d j o y . F o r B e h m e n G o d is t h e A b y s s , t h e U r g r u n d , o f N a t u r e a n d M a n , s o m e t h i n g l i k e S p i n o z a ' s sub
stantia,
yet u n l i k e 'substance'
i n being a fountain o f light.
B e h m e n s a w m o s t o f s o c i e t y as l i v i n g o n t h e c i r c u m f e r e n c e o f r e a l i t y , a n d t h e i n d i v i d u a l s o u l as a s p a r k o f t h e d i v i n e i n n e e d o f r e a l i z i n g its i n b o r n l o n g i n g f o r ' t h e c e n t r a l F i r e . ' M a n m a y g r o w t o w a r d s the centre, he t h o u g h t , o r a w a y f r o m centre to t h e m e r e a p p e a r a n c e o f life. E a c h s o u l ' s t a s k is t o
pursue
s e l f - k n o w l e d g e i n o r d e r t o r e j o i n t h e o r i g i n a l F i r e . I t is t h e function
of m a t u r i n g knowledge a n d religious growth
to
d i r e c t h i m t o w a r d s t h e c e n t r e f r o m w h i c h h e s p r a n g , so t h a t the F i r e o f a n g u i s h a n d desire becomes, t h r o u g h the fulfilment o f d i v i n e l o n g i n g , the L i g h t o f love. Coleridge conceded
that sometimes
he f o u n d
Behmen
i n c o m p r e h e n s i b l e , also pantheistic i n his a p p a r e n t transposi n g o f G o d a n d the W o r l d o r N a t u r e ; the m a r g i n a l i a o n the B e h m e n v o l u m e s are often mystified o r c r i t i c a l . works in what
Behmen's
is c o m m o n l y k n o w n as L a w ' s e d i t i o n
are
d i f f i c u l t , as a l l m y s t i c a l w r i t i n g s a r e t o t h e n o v i c e , b u t t h e s e a r e m a d e a t h o u s a n d t i m e s m o r e so b y B e h m e n ' s u n o r g a n i z e d profusion o f i m a g e r y , often i n a p r i v a t e tortuous (Anguish,
language.
o n e o f his f a v o u r i t e w o r d s , describes the state o f
m i n d o f any o r d i n a r y reader.) Y e t C o l e r i d g e w h i l e still a schoolboy
was
fascinated
enough
by Behmen's
desperate
a t t e m p t s to e n u n c i a t e his t r o u b l e d insights i n t o the conflicts i n t h e h u m a n c o n d i t i o n t o fight h i s w a y t h r o u g h . 32
I t w o u l d b e f o l l y i n a p a r a g r a p h o r t w o , e v e n i f o n e felt m o r e secure t h a n I d o i n one's u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f B e h m e n , to e l u c i d a t e fully the r a m i f i c a t i o n s o f his t h o u g h t . I n a n y case, i t is n o t B e h m e n ' s p a r t i c u l a r v i e w s w e a r e c o n c e r n e d w i t h h e r e , but
rather Coleridge's analysis o f a religious philosopher, a
theosophist, t w o h u n d r e d years before h i m . T h e m a i n statem e n t is i n t h e e l e v e n t h o f The Philosophical
Lectures ( 3 2 9 - 3 1 ) .
H a v i n g referred to B e h m e n ' s 'delusions, f r o m w a n t o f a l l intellectual discipline' a n d from 'ignorance o f rational psychology,' the latter ' i n c o m m o n w i t h the most learned theolog i a n s o f h i s a g e , ' C o l e r i d g e says, He was indeed a stupendous human being. H a d he received the
discipline of education, above all had he possessed the knowledge which would have guarded him against his own delusions, I scarcely
know whether we should have had reason to attribute greater genius
even to Plato himself. When I consider that this ignorant man by the result of his own meditations presented the Newtonian system [by
anticipation] in a clearness which it certainly had never before
appeared in, not even to Copernicus himself, or to the learned
Bruno [Coleridge refers to what looks like some concept of universal
gravitation in Behmen]; when I trace in him the love of action and that constant sense of the truth that all nature is in a perpetual
evolution, that two great powers are for ever working, manifesting
themselves alike in the apparently inadequate and inanimated, and
in intellectual nature, (namely the powers by which each particular endeavours to detach itself from nature and the counteracting pow
ers by which nature is still bringing back each of her creatures into
itself - this led him assuredly into anticipations and views of truth
which will detract from many modern discoveries some part, at least,
of their originality); but above all that spirit of love which runs through him; that dread of contempt; that belief that the potential
works in us even as the actual is working on us, and that not only man but every creature contains in itself a higher being,... 33
H e t h e n refers t o B e h m e n ' s t e n d e n c y t o
pantheism.
From this I cannot excuse Behmen's writings, any more than I can
praise or attempt or pretend to understand many of the strange
fancies by which he has represented his truths. Sometimes indeed one can guess at the meaning; sometimes it is utter darkness. A n d
altogether he represents a great mirror, but placed in the shade; all
the objects of nature seem to pass by, but they are reflected in shadow and dimly, but now and then a light passes along and the mirror in the shade flashes...
C o l e r i d g e was w i l l i n g to w o r k for his gains f r o m a difficult w r i t e r . H e f o u n d i n B e h m e n w h a t he w a s s e a r c h i n g for, some liberation
from
the
eighteenth-century
'fixities
and
definites'
of
the
late
applications o f N e w t o n i a n physics a n d
L o c k i a n p s y c h o l o g y w h i c h h a d p r e v a i l e d i n his u n d e r g r a d u a t e d a y s . I t d e l i g h t e d C o l e r i d g e t o r e a d ' t h a t a l l n a t u r e is i n a perpetual
evolution,
working'-'the
belief
that
two
that
the
great
powers
potential
are
works
forever in
us'-
'above a l l the S p i r i t o f love.' T h e universe was therefore not static, b u t i n process, a n d m a n w a s not a d e s p a i r i n g c o g i n the N e w t o n i a n m a c h i n e . T h e r e f o r e a l l t h a t is, is n o t n e c e s s a r i l y right, b u t c h a n g i n g , a n d m a n p a r t i c i p a t e s actively, not passively, a n d b y i m a g i n a t i o n a n d love. G o d was not a r b i t r a r y , but c o n t i n u a l l y creating the universe out o f m a t e r i a l
and
s p i r i t u a l f o r c e , a f o u n t a i n o f fire, e n e r g y , a n d l i g h t .
(The
fountain was a h i g h l y integrating image i n Coleridge's poems, a
c e n t r a l s y m b o l for a d y n a m i c , u n i f y i n g energy;
it
was
c e n t r a l to a l l his t h i n k i n g . ) P e r h a p s the m o s t r a d i c a l t h e m e o f a l l i n B e h m e n a n d the most satisfying to C o l e r i d g e was the daring-or
naive-or
tion o f the naturalness
at
any
rate
unapologetic - assump-
o f the c o n j u n c t i o n o f t h o u g h t
and
feeling. O n t h a t a s s u m p t i o n C o l e r i d g e ' s case for the p o t e n c y of i m a g i n a t i o n was built. 34
In
the
summer
o f 1801 C o l e r i d g e w a s r e a d i n g H e n r y
M o r e ' s Brief Discourse of Enthusiasm he
snobbishly called
i n w h i c h M o r e gave what
'divers o d d conceits out
of several
"Theosophists a n d C h y m i s t s " ' w i t h o u t n a m i n g the authors. C o l e r i d g e i d e n t i f i e d o n e o f t h e m as J a c o b B e h m e n , t h o u g h M o r e ' s p a r a p h r a s e o f B e h m e n ' s Aurora w a s s o m e w h a t r o u g h and
casual.
More
also referred
to Paracelsus
sneeringly
t h r o u g h five sections, w h e r e u p o n C o l e r i d g e at o n c e m a d e a n o t e , t o get h o l d o f P a r a c e l s u s : Behmen's o p i n i o n - T h a t all is God's self-that a man's self is G o d if he live holily - that the Waters of this World are mad - / likewise
endeavour to get Paracelsus de Meteoris, his Scientia Astronom[ica], & his de natura rerum. [CM I 1000 E]
H e d i d see P a r a c e l s u s , t h e t h r e e - v o l u m e G e n e v a e d i t i o n o f 1 6 5 8 ; h i s f r i e n d J . H . G r e e n ' s c o p y is n o w i n t h e l i b r a r y o f t h e R o y a l College of Physicians a n d Surgeons. W h i c h works d i d h e r e a d ? O n e w o n d e r s . A l t h o u g h P a r a c e l s u s ( 1 4 9 3 - 1 5 4 1 ) is sometimes c a l l e d the M a r t i n L u t h e r of m e d i c i n e , reports are c o n t r a d i c t o r y , m a n y o f t h e m f r o m hostile c o n t e m p o r a r i e s to w h o m h i s r a d i c a l i d e a s c o n s t i t u t e d a t h r e a t . I t is c l e a r t h a t h e offered C o l e r i d g e some g r o u n d s for i d e n t i f i c a t i o n , p e r h a p s a l s o f o r e n v i o u s c o n t r a s t , a n d y e t i t is a l s o c l e a r t h a t P a r a c e l s u s was a b o l d , contentious, a r r o g a n t fellow. ( T h e n a m e P a r a c e l s u s h e g a v e t o h i m s e l f , i.e. ' g r e a t e r t h a n - C e l s u s . ' ) J o h n D o n n e , a m o n g others, a t t r i b u t e d his l e g e n d a r y m e d i c a l p o w ers t o a F a u s t - l i k e c o m m u n i c a t i o n w i t h t h e D e v i l . H e w a s r o u g h , o f n o a c a d e m i c s t a n d i n g , yet a l l the t i m e aggressively p r o p o s i n g e x p e r i m e n t s a n d theories to upset the c o n v e n t i o n a l professionals w h o refused to q u e s t i o n A r i s t o t l e ' s ipse dixits. H e a t t a c k e d a n d i n d e e d w a s i n s t r u m e n t a l i n d e s t r o y i n g as a m e d i c a l theory the n o t i o n o f the ' h u m o u r s , ' a n d insisted o n i n q u i r i n g i n t o s p e c i f i c diseases a n d s p e c i f i c c u r e s . A n d h e h a d 35
s o m e a s t o n i s h i n g g o o d l u c k as a p r a c t i t i o n e r , c o n f o u n d i n g t h e g r e y b e a r d s . H e g a v e o n e o f t h e first c l i n i c a l d e s c r i p t i o n s o f syphilis, suggesting a b i o c h e m i c a l cure, w i t h mercury. F u l l o f c o n t r a d i c t i o n s , a t t h e s a m e t i m e as h e w a s i n s i s t i n g o n t r e a t m e n t o f t h e h u m a n o r g a n i s m as a w h o l e , a n d s t r e s s i n g t h e m i n d o f t h e p a t i e n t as a n e c e s s a r y p a r t o f i t , t h e m a n a l s o w a s g o i n g i n for a l c h e m y a n d astrology, a n d c l a i m i n g i n t i m a c y w i t h o c c u l t forces. A t t a c k i n g c o n t e m p o r a r y m e d i c a l b i g o t r y , f r a u d , a n d i g n o r a n c e , he yet p r e t e n d e d to c o m m u n i c a t i o n s o f his o w n w i t h superior p o w e r s - a f a m i l i a r e n o u g h
defence
m e c h a n i s m . B o e r h a a v e d e s c r i b e d h i m , a c c o r d i n g to C o l e r i d g e , 'as a g r e a t , a n o m a l o u s , u n a c c o u n t a b l e f e l l o w '
[CN III
4414]. I n t h e Notebooks t h e first d i r e c t q u o t a t i o n f r o m P a r a c e l s u s is
f r o m t h e Paragranum,
s a i d to be the m o s t savage a t t a c k o n
d o c t o r s e v e r w r i t t e n . It w a s his m o s t b r u t a l ( a n d c e n t r a l ) w o r k , the one i n w h i c h he destroyed the theory o f 'the h u m ours,'
i n v e n t i n g instead his n e w p h y s i o l o g i c a l
hypotheses
a b o u t t h e h u m a n b o d y as a n i n d e p e n d e n t o r g a n i c w h o l e . I n the notebook entry C o l e r i d g e q u o t e d i n the L a t i n the famous passage i n w h i c h Paracelsus - w h o a d v o c a t e d n a t u r a l cures - p e r v e r s e l y s a i d , ' N a t u r e i t s e l f is a d i s e a s e . ' C o l e r i d g e v e r s i fied his o w n g r i m personal e x t r a p o l a t i o n : Ills from without extrinsic Balms may heal,
Oft cur'd & wounded by the self-same Steel But us what remedy can heal or cure,
Whose very nature is our worst disease. [CJVlll 3616] A few pages later i n the same notebook C o l e r i d g e m a d e n o t e s o n m o r e p a s s a g e s f r o m t h e Paragranum,
i n c l u d i n g the
preface b y Bitisky defending Paracelsus against charges o f 'obscurity' a n d o f unnecessarily c o i n i n g new terms - charges all too f a m i l i a r to C o l e r i d g e himself. E . g . one o f the n e w words 36
coined b y Paracelsus (and then used b y B e h m e n ) was o f c e n t r a l i n t e r e s t t o C o l e r i d g e , t h e w o r d Archeus, t h e i d e a o f a seminal R e a s o n or Logos, a vital principle. H e took
from
P a r a c e l s u s a q u o t a t i o n he a p p l i e d l a t e r o n to himself: What does it matter to me whether they follow or pursue me? I shall not try to force them. I shall, however, expose them, because they
altogether abound in frauds and impostures and have~no other
foundation than that which arises from the itch for the applause of the mob and from ignorance. Whoever is faithful and honest to his
own heart, and whoever in practice tries to imitate nature in art, will not avoid me or turn away. [CN III 3660 and n]
Coleridge's
m o s t s u s t a i n e d s t a t e m e n t a b o u t P a r a c e l s u s is
f o u n d i n a n o t e i n t h e m a r g i n s o f F u l l e r ' s Holy State ( B k II c h 3) o n F u l l e r ' s L i f e o f P a r a c e l s u s . A s u s u a l , e n t h u s i a s m is t e m p e r e d w i t h but not d a m p e d by critical judgement: It is matter of regret with me, that Fuller (whose wit alike in quantity, quality and perspicuity surpassing that of the wittiest in a
witty Age,... had not looked thro' the two Latin Folios of Paracelsus's Works. It is not to be doubted, that a rich and delightful Article
would have been the result. / For who like Fuller, could have
brought out, and set forth, this singular Compound of true philoso
phic Genius with the morals of a Quack and the manners of a K i n g of the Gypsies? Nevertheless, Paracelsus belonged to his Age, viz. the
Dawn of Experimental Science; and a well-written Critique on his Life & Writings would present thro' the magnifying glass of a Caricature the distinguishing features of the Helmonts, Kircher, in short, of the host of Naturalists of the 16
continues,
on
the
subject
th
Century - / ... [He
of Alchemy]:... N.b. T h e Potential
( = Aoyoc, OeavOpcoTCoq), the ground of the Prophetic, directed the
first Thinkers (= Mystae) to the metallic bodies, as the Key of all natural Science. T h e then Actual blended with this instinct all the 37
fancies, and fond desires, and false perspective, of the Childhood of Intellect. T h e essence was truth, the form was folly: and this is the
definition of Alchemy. - Nevertheless, the very terms bear witness to the veracity of the original Instinct / T h e World of Sensible Expe
rience cannot be more luminously divided than into the modifying
powers, T O OLXkov - that which differences, makes this other than that: and
the uex' OCMJOV, that which is beyond or deeper than modifi
cation. Metallon is strictly 'the Base of the Mode:' and such have the
Metals been determined to be by modern C h e m i s t r y . - A n d what are now the great problems of Chemistry? T h e difference of the
Metals themselves, their origin, the causes of their locations, of their
co-existence in the same ore (ex. gr. of Iridium, Osmium, Palladium,
Rhodium, and Iron with Platinum).-Were these problems solved, the results who dare limit?...
And
t h e a n n o t a t i o n o n F u l l e r ' s Life e n d s w i t h :
The Light was for the greater part suffocated, and the rest fantasti cally refracted; but still it was Light struggling in the darkness. A n d I
am persuaded, that to the full triumph of Science, it will be necessary
that Nature should be commanded more spiritually than hithertoi.e. more directly in the power of T H E WILL.
Is t h e r e n o t a m o d e r n r i n g t o t h i s ? A r e p h y s i c i s t s , c h e m i s t s , e c o l o g i s t s , a n d a l l t h e rest o f us, n o t n o w t a l k i n g a b o u t t h e ' m o r a l responsibilities' o f science? It is e v i d e n t t h a t C o l e r i d g e ' s a d m i r a t i o n f o r P a r a c e l s u s w a s far f r o m i d o l a t r o u s , b u t i t is a l s o c l e a r t h a t t h e a t t r a c t i o n s o f P a r a c e l s u s ' s s u b j e c t a n d h i s o r i g i n a l i t y w e r e s u c h as t o d r a w C o l e r i d g e i n t o his folio v o l u m e s to t r y to u n d e r s t a n d the t h i n k i n g o f this w i l d , rude, lonely, o r i g i n a l m a n , ' a p i l g r i m all my
life,' P a r a c e l s u s said, ' a l o n e a n d a s t r a n g e r feeling a l i e n , '
whose aggressions p r o d u c e d the s t o r m y works a t t a c k i n g his
38
w h o l e profession; a n d w h o yet said, 'the g r o u n d o f a l l m e d i c i n e is l o v e . ' P a r a c e l s u s n e x t to B e h m e n m u s t be one o f the m o r e u n c l e a r o f w r i t e r s . H e w a s u n c l e a r to himself. T h a t C o l e r i d g e a p p e a r s to h a v e u n d e r s t o o d
the c e n t r a l positions t h r o u g h the
wild
turmoil of physiology, prophecy, alchemical and astrological muddle, from
a
out o f the
chinks i n w h i c h g l i m m e r some
primitive biochemistry
and
lights
psychology, all in
a
r o u g h S w i s s - G e r m a n d i a l e c t o r less t h a n e l e g a n t L a t i n , is a s i g n o f C o l e r i d g e ' s p e r s i s t e n c e a n d s k i l l s as a r e a d e r , r a t h e r than
of
Paracelsian
lucidity.
The
most
fundamental
P a r a c e l s i a n d i s c o v e r y a n d h y p h o t h e s i s w a s t h a t diseases a r e both visible a n d invisible. T h i s Coleridge understood than
better
most.
H e was not c o n c e r n e d to establish the correctness o f P a r a celsian m e d i c i n e . U n d o u b t e d l y the fascinating t h i n g a b o u t Paracelsus was his coarse a n d ruthless scepticism a b o u t the p r e v a i l i n g a s s u m p t i o n s o f his t i m e . T h i s p r o v o k e d his u n r e m i t t i n g s e a r c h f o r 'forces' w i t h i n m a n a n d w i t h i n n a t u r e , forces w i t h i n the m i c r o c o s m o s a n d the m a c r o c o s m o s comprehended
a l i k e to
be
as o n e ' A r c h e u s , ' o n e set o f l a w s , t h u s t o free
m a n f r o m the m e n t a l b o n d a g e o f h i d e b o u n d q u a c k e r y the arbitrariness
and
o f i g n o r a n t m e n w i t h p o w e r . It w a s
the
search for l a w , l a w s o f m i n d a n d l a w s o f n a t u r e , a n d
the
h u m a n processes b e h i n d d i s c o v e r y o f t h e m t h a t m a d e P a r a celsus i n t e r e s t i n g to C o l e r i d g e , n o t Paracelsus's c o n c l u s i o n s . T h e attempted integration of m a n a n d nature was
2
pursued
w i t h less p i e t y a n d m o r e s c i e n c e , a n d m o r e f e r o c i t y i n t h i s c a s e t h a n i n B e h m e n ' s , b u t a c o m m o n d e n o m i n a t o r w a s there for Coleridge. 2 In Southey's Omniana (1812) 1216 Coleridge wrote: 'Paracelsus was a brag gart and a quack; so was C a r d a n , but it was their merits, and not their
follies, which drew upon them that torrent of detractions and calumny.'
39
G i o r d a n o B r u n o (1548-1600) w a s b e t t e r k n o w n i n C o l e ridge's t i m e for his s t u b b o r n m a r t y r d o m at the stake t h a n for his
writings.
It
was
Bruno
the
heretical
astronomer-
p h i l o s o p h e r , poet a n d defiant satirist o f c o m p l a c e n t
acade-
m i a , i n w h o m C o l e r i d g e was interested. C u r i o u s l y he d i d not d i s c u s s a t l e n g t h t h e B r u n o o f t h e a r t o f m e m o r y , so l e a r n e d l y elucidated by Frances Yates. Bruno's w o r k s - a b o u t
twenty-
six a r e k n o w n b y title, o f w h i c h C o l e r i d g e s a w at least s i x 3
were very scarce a n d thought
to be nonsense.
In Bruno's
defence, C o l e r i d g e c o m p l a i n e d that they were often full o f w h a t seemed ' i m p e n e t r a b l e obscurity, i n w h i c h B r u n o shares o n e a n d t h e s a m e fate w i t h P l a t o , A r i s t o t l e , K a n t , a n d i n t r u t h w i t h every great discoverer a n d benefactor o f the h u m a n race; e x c e p t i n g o n l y w h e n the discoveries h a v e been c a p a b l e o f b e i n g r e n d e r e d p a l p a b l e to the o u t w a r d senses.' Bruno's
imaginative
comprehension
of an
4
infinity
of
w o r l d s , e a c h i m p e l l e d i n its o w n m o t i o n b y its o w n n a t u r e a n d yet p a r t o f a n i n f i n i t e w h o l e , cast d o u b t o n the o l d A r i s t o t e l i a n series o f c o n c e n t r i c s p h e r e s w i t h t h e e a r t h fixed i n t h e m i d d l e , a n d even o n the C o p e r n i c a n m o d i f i c a t i o n o f the a n n u a l rotat i o n o f t h e e a r t h a r o u n d t h e s u n a n d t h e d a i l y r o t a t i o n o n its axis. B r u n o s a w t h a t C o p e r n i c u s h a d i n fact i n t r o d u c e d a c o m p l e t e l y n e w cosmology. B r u n o envisaged a vast o r g a n i c cosmos i n w h i c h a l l p h e n o m e n a i n space a n d time, m a t e r i a l a n d s p i r i t u a l , w e r e related. It was c e r t a i n l y a v i s i o n too b i g for 3 See CAf II 2264 and Friend (CQ I 118. 4 'Magnanimity': Omniana § 129. T h e little essay continues by referring disparagingly to '"our sober judicious critics", the men of "sound
common sense", i.e. of those snails in intellect who wear their eyes at
the tips of their feelers, and cannot even see unless they at the same time
touch - W h e n these finger-philosophers affirm that Plato, Bruno, & c must
have been "out of their senses", the just and proper retort is "Gentlemen! it is
still worse with you! Y o u have lost your reasonV"
40
most m i n d s . E a r t h was no l o n g e r a special creation, hence the c h a r g e o f heresy. A n d w h a t o f the a p p l i c a t i o n o f c o s m i c i n f i n i t y t o h u m a n life? T h i s w a s n o t p r e s s e d h o m e b y B r u n o , so f a r as I h a v e b e e n a b l e t o r e a d h i m , b u t t h e r e l a t i v i s t i m p l i c a t i o n s d i d not escape a C o l e r i d g e . Coleridge must
have found a fellow-feeling i n Bruno's
c h a r m i n g a n e c d o t e i n t h e p o e m , De Immenso, o f h o w as a c h i l d , l i v i n g i n N o l a i n Italy, o n the slopes o f M t C i c a d a a n d thus m u c h a w a r e o f that same ' V a s t ' that C o l e r i d g e c a m e to k n o w i n O t t e r y St M a r y , he too learned the disparity between a p p e a r a n c e a n d r e a l i t y , o r as h e s a i d , ' h o w d i s t a n c e c h a n g e s the face o f t h i n g s . ' H e tells o f h o w w h e n he w a s a c h i l d M t C i c a d a used to speak to h i m o f the r i v a l b e a u t y o f the m o u n t a i n opposite, M t Vesuvius. S o he w a l k e d over a n d c l i m b e d Vesuvius
which
also spoke to h i m , o f the
darkness
and
d r e a r i n e s s o f its o p p o s i t e - M t C i c a d a . B u t t h e y o u n g B r u n o i n f o r m e d V e s u v i u s t h a t s u c h w a s e x a c t l y its o w n
appear-
a n c e f r o m C i c a d a , a n d t h a t r e a l l y C i c a d a w a s j u s t as b e a u t i ful.
B r u n o says
of himself
and
this fantasy,
'Thus
t h e y first t e a c h t h e l a d t o d o u b t . ' A n d w e m i g h t a d d ,
did to
philosophize. F r o m De Immenso, t h e first l o n g q u o t a t i o n s i n t h e Notebooks i n t h e o r i g i n a l L a t i n w e r e t a k e n i n 1 8 0 1 , t h e first e x c e r p t being an example of Bruno's well-known truculence which C o l e r i d g e l i k e d to q u o t e a n d sometimes a p p l i e d to himself: ' P a y p a r t i c u l a r a t t e n t i o n , I b e s e e c h y o u , t o t h e s e t h i n g s (i.e. t h e n e w v i e w o f t h e c o s m o s as i n f i n i t e ) : i n t h a t w a y y o u m a y u n d e r s t a n d m e , a p e r s o n w h o m a y p e r h a p s seem m a d - o r at least see w h y I a m m a d ' (CN I 9 2 7 ) ; C o l e r i d g e u s e d i t i n h i s p e r i o d i c a l , The Friend, i n d e f e n c e o f h i s a t t a c k s o n t h e l a m e n -
t a b l e state o f p u b l i c taste a n d k n o w l e d g e i n 1809. T h e r e he g l o s s e d B r u n o : ' W h a t I feel d e e p l y , f r e e l y w i l l I u t t e r . T r u t h is not D e t r a c t i o n : a n d assuredly w e d o not hate h i m to w h o m w e
41
tell the T r u t h . B u t w i t h w h o m s o e v e r w e p l a y the D e c e i v e r a n d F l a t t e r e r , h i m at the b o t t o m w e d e s p i s e . '
5
T h e r e are further selections (eight pages o f L a t i n ) c o p i e d o u t b y h a n d f r o m De Immenso w i t h C o l e r i d g e ' s r u n n i n g c o m m e n t s ; i t is c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f w h a t goes o n i n t h e n o t e b o o k s . First C o l e r i d g e leapt into the m i d d l e o f the w o r k , extracti n g the piece just q u o t e d (CJVI 927). H e t h e n a d d e d : ' B r u n o , p . 5 2 4 , 5 2 5 , 5 2 8 De Univ[erso]
et Innum[erabilis]
speaks f a m i l -
i a r l y o f the c i r c u l a t i o n o f the B l o o d - & not o n l y o f the C i r c u l a t i o m i n o r d i s c o v e r e d b y Servetus,' a n d he referred to the r e l e v a n t passages. ( T h i s m a t e r i a l w a s l a t e r u s e d b y C o l e r i d g e i n a n article o n ' T h e c i r c u l a t i o n o f the B l o o d ' i n Southey's c a t c h - a l l Omniana
o f 1 8 1 2 , § 122.)
P e r h a p s it w a s t h e n e x t d a y o r s o o n a f t e r t h a t C o l e r i d g e d e c i d e d to b e g i n a m o r e systematic s t u d y o f B r u n o a n d took a fresh page: ' M o n d a y , A p r i l . 1 8 0 1 . - a n d T u e s d a y , r e a d t w o W o r k s of G i o r d a n o B r u n o , printed i n one book w i t h
one
t i t l e - p a g e , ' a n d h e g i v e s i n f u l l t h e l o n g t i t l e s o f t w o w o r k s De Monade,
Numero,
et Figurd,
a n d De Immenso w i t h t h e n a m e s o f
the F r a n k f u r t printers a n d the date, 1591. ( M a n y o f B r u n o ' s w o r k s h a d b e e n g i v e n d e c e p t i v e i m p r i n t s for the safety o f the p r i n t e r s , o t h e r w i s e l i k e B r u n o , o p e n to c h a r g e s o f heresy.) C o l e r i d g e d e s c r i b e d the p h y s i c a l v o l u m e , a n d c o m m e n t e d : T h e n the Work 'De Monade, Numero et Figura, secretions nempe Physicae, Mathematicae, & Metaphysicae elementa' commences - w h i c h as well as the 8 books de Innumer.&c is a Poem in latin Hexameters, divided (each Book) into Chapters, & to each Chapter is affixed a prose Commentary. If the 5 books de M i n i m o , & c to which this Book is consequent, are of the same character, I lost nothing in not having it. T h e work de M o n a d e . - I t was far too numeral, lineal, & pythagorean for my Comprehension - it read very 5 Friend {CQ II87 42
much like Thomas Taylor & Proclus & c . I by no means think it
certain that there is no meaning in these Works, nor do I presume even to suppose, that the meaning is of no value - / but it is d e I m m e n s o et I n n u m e r a b i l i is o f a d i f f e r e n t c h a r a c t e r - ' h e s a i d , e x c e r p t i n g p o e t i c p a s s a g e s i n w h i c h B r u n o seeks ( t o q u o t e h i m i n C o l e r i d g e ' s translation) 'the splendor, the interfusion, a n d c o m m u n i c a tion o f the D i v i n i t y a n d o f N a t u r e ' a n d contemplates the Host of Stars, of Worlds and their guardian Deities, numbers
without number, each in its appointed sphere, singing together, and dancing in adoration of the O n e Most High. Thus from the perpet ual, immense, and innumerable goings on of the visible world, that
sempiternal and absolutely infinite Majesty is intellectually beheld ...Thence was man entitled by Trismegistus, 'the great Miracle',
inasmuch as he has been made capable of entering into union with
G o d , as if he were himself a divine nature; tries to become all things,
even as in G o d all things are; and in limitless progression of limited
States of being, urges onward to the ultimate aim, even as G o d is
simultaneously infinite, and everywere All! [CN I 928n]
C o l e r i d g e , like the C h u r c h , w a s able to discern the scientific thought b e h i n d the poetic language, but, whereas C o l e r i d g e was excited a n d delighted, the C h u r c h c h a r g e d such poetry w i t h d a n g e r o u s p a n t h e i s m a n d b u r n e d B r u n o as a h e r e t i c f o r his refusal to retract. I n h i s Essay on Man C a s s i r e r m a k e s a u s e f u l s t a t e m e n t a b o u t the significance o f B r u n o i n his time: 43
... In Stoic philosophy and in Christian theology man was described
as the end of the universe. Both doctrines are convinced that there is
a general providence ruling over the world and the destiny of man.
This concept is one of the basic presuppositions of Stoic and Chris
tian thought. A l l this is suddenly called into question by the new
cosmology. Man's claim to being the center of the universe has lost its
foundation. M a n is placed in an infinite space in which his being seems to be a single and vanishing point. H e is surrounded by a mute
universe, by a world that is silent to his religious feelings and to his
deepest moral demands... M o d e r n philosophy and modern science had to accept the challenge contained in these words. They had to
prove that the new cosmology, far from enfeebling or obstructing the power of human reason, establishes and confirms this power... to
turn the apparent curse of the new cosmology into a blessing. Gior dano Bruno was the first thinker to enter upon this path, which in a
sense became the path of all modern metaphysics. What is character
istic of the philosophy of Giordano Bruno is that here the term 'infinity' changes its meaning. In Greek classical thought infinity is a
negative concept. T h e infinite is the boundless or indeterminate... In
Bruno's doctrine infinity no longer means a mere negation or limita tion. O n the contrary, it means the immeasurable and inexhaustible
abundance of reality and the unrestricted power of the human intellect. It is in this sense that Bruno understands and interprets the
Copernican doctrine. This doctrine, according to Bruno, was the
first and decisive step toward man's self-liberation. M a n no longer lives in the world as a prisoner enclosed within the narrow walls of a
finite physical universe. H e can traverse the air and break through
all the imaginary boundaries of the celestial spheres which have been erected by a false metaphysics and cosmology. T h e infinite universe
sets no limits to human reason. T h e human intellect becomes aware
of its own infinity through measuring its powers by the infinite universe.
6
6 Ernst Gassirer An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture (1953) 32-3 44
C o l e r i d g e d e f e n d e d B r u n o as ' a v i g o r o u s m i n d s t r u g g l i n g after
truth,
amid
many
prejudices';
7
he even
wondered
w h e t h e r he s h o u l d n ' t try to b o r r o w f r o m M a l t a , B r u n o ' s w o r k o n L o g i c w h e r e h e h a d s e e n t h e o n e c o p y h e k n e w of. F o r w h a t p u r p o s e ? I t is t y p i c a l o f C o l e r i d g e ' s d y n a m i c r e l a t i o n t o a thinker,
regardless o f period.
H e felt
Bruno's
sixteenth-
c e n t u r y logic was just w h a t was n e e d e d to p r i c k the b u b b l e o f loose c o m p l a c e n t n i n e t e e n t h - c e n t u r y o p t i m i s m a b o u t elect r i c i t y . T h e v o l t a i c p i l e , d i s c o v e r e d i n 1799 ( h a r d u p o n t h e Lyrical
Ballads b u t c r e a t i n g c o n s i d e r a b l y m o r e n o i s e ) m a d e
electricity a subject i n fashionable d r a w i n g rooms. E v e r y t h i n g w a s to be e x p l a i n e d , e v e r y t h i n g to be solved b y it. C o l e r i d g e , w h o r e a d the latest scientific j o u r n a l s a n d a t t e n d e d m a n y o f the lectures o f D a v y , B r a n d e , a n d others, at the R o y a l Institution, was horrified b y a l l the l a x talk a n d sheer s t u p i d fashionableness: I do not like that presumptuous Philosophy which in its rage of explanation allows no xyz, no symbol representative of the vast
Terra Incognita of Knowlege, for the Facts and Agencies of M i n d
and matter reserved for future Explorers/while the ultimate grounds of all must remain inexplorable or M a n must cease to be
progressive. O u r Ignorance with all the intermediates of obscurity is the condition of our ever-increasing Knowlege. Consider for a
moment the multitude and the importances of the phaenomena now
universally referred to electric agency-not to mention those now
explained by the electro-chemical combination of the ponderable portion of oxygen Gas with metallic bases, or with hydrogen... Hav
ing made a numeration-table of these Phaenomena, then consult the
Works of those Physiologists who flourished & uttered oracles before
the discovery of Electricity. Their several explanations will furnish a
Lesson not only of modesty but of L o g i c - F o r , doubtless, by a more 7 Friend (CQ II81-2 45
watchful, and austere, as well as more modest & for that cause anticipative, Logic, the false part of these explanations might even then have been detected - & such explanations given, as would have
preserved our existing quantum of knowlege pure from positive
error, by avowedly including our ignorance in our knowlege, under a common Symbol. Thus in the old explanation of Thunder &
Lightning, that it was Fire by the dashing together of Clouds - Here was
presumption / H a d they been contented to say, that clouds contained Fire in a latent form, which under given circumstances passed from
one to the other; but that these circumstances, that is, that the law of Fire as contained in Vapors, remained to be discovered - all would
have been right-and Fire would have been a fair generic term, or
Symbol, which thus limited would have represented as in a process of
Algebra, that particular species of Fire, which in the conclusion would have come out as Electricity. [CN III 3825]
H e goes o n t o c o m p l a i n t h a t p e o p l e a r e t o o e a g e r t o e x p l a i n everything: ... the whole explanation must be seized from the scanty possessions behind us, not borrowed from the vast tract before u s - a n d because the
former pigmy Domain contained the fact of Fire generated by collision, as of Flint & Steel, or by friction, as of the Wheel & Axle,
therefore two mists in the air must be dashed against each other, or rubbed together. [CN ill 3825]
The
physical
picture
o f collision,
or friction,
has easily
u s u r p e d t h e p l a c e o f r e a l e x p l a n a t i o n ; t h e r e is m o r e o f a l l t h i s , b u t the e n t r y ends: ... I exceedingly wish, I could procure from M a l t a the Logica Venatrix of Giord. Bruno.
46
T h e p l a n was fantastic i n w a r t i m e (the d a t e was 1810 a n d the M e d i t e r r a n e a n c o n v o y s w e r e a n y t h i n g b u t safe), b u t so exceed
ingly d i d h e w i s h it h e t h o u g h t o f a p p l y i n g t o L o r d M u l g r a v e
(First L o r d o f the A d m i r a l t y ) , o r to the P r i m e M i n i s t e r ! H o w o n e not l o v e C o l e r i d g e ?
can
B u t t h i s C o l e r i d g e , t h e p a s s i o n a t e i n q u i r e r , is s c e p t i c a l t o o . He
is a s k i n g , w h a t is t h e t r u t h i n a l l t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e
p r i n c i p l e s o f e l e c t r i c i t y a n d w h a t are those p r i n c i p l e s i n r e a l i t y ? H o w m u c h is a s s u m p t i o n , h o w m u c h p i c t u r e - l a n g u a g e , h o w m u c h the o v e r w e e n i n g desire for one s i m p l e e x p l a n a t i o n for e v e r y t h i n g ? G e t a t it b y s c r u t i n i z i n g t h e t h o u g h t p r o c e s s e s b e h i n d i t first. I t w a s C o l e r i d g e ' s b l i n d i n g r e a l i s m o u t o f h i s own
e x p e r i e n c e t o b e a b l e t o see a n d d e s c r i b e a n d k n o w t h e
difference b e t w e e n things observed a n d things i m a g i n e d . H e w i l l not be t a k e n i n either b y the 'fashion' for electricity, o r b y r e a c t i o n a r y a u t h o r i t y ' s distaste for visionaries; visionaries just may h a v e g l i m p s e s o f w h a t
it l a y a h e a d
of their time
to
d i s c o v e r . T h e p r i n c i p l e w a s t h e s a m e as w i t h B e h m e n , t h o u g h B r u n o was immensely learned whereas B e h m e n was u n e d u cated. B u t C o l e r i d g e w i l l take i m m e n s e trouble to u n d e r s t a n d both. I f his interest i n r a d i c a l t h i n k e r s h a d b e e n m e r e l y a s y m p a t h y for o d d characters o r h e r o i c m a r t y r s o f the past, o r b r i l l i a n t i n d i v i d u a l s a h e a d o f t h e i r t i m e , i t w o u l d g i v e us a n i m p r e s s i o n o f his s u b j e c t i v e c h o i c e s i n h i s w o r l d , a n d a l s o s o m e i m p r e s s i o n s o f h i s sense o f h u m a n
history a n d some i m -
p o r t a n t a c t o r s i n it. B u t t h e p e n e t r a t i o n is s o m e w h a t
deeper
t h a n that. In
the s a m e lecture q u o t e d before, the e l e v e n t h o f his
Philosophical
Lectures, C o l e r i d g e m a d e a m o d e r n c o m p l a i n t
a b o u t the s t r a i t - l a c e d c o n v e n t i o n a l i t y o f scientists a n d p h i l o s o p h e r s ( t h e p a s s a g e is q u o t e d i n p a r t b y L o r e n E i s e l e y i n The Firmament
of
Time): 47
Whoever is acquainted with the history of philosophy during the last
two or three centuries, cannot but admit, that there appears to have
existed a sort of secret and tacit compact among the learned, not to
pass beyond a certain limit in speculative science. T h e privilege of free thought, so highly extolled, has at no time been held valid in
actual practice, except within this limit; and not a single stride
beyond it has ever been ventured without bringing obloquy on the transgressor... [We can all think of today's examples.] Therefore the
true depth of science, and the penetration to the inmost centre from
which all the lines of knowledge diverge to their ever distant circum
ference, was abandoned to the illiterate and the simple [like Beh
men], whom unstilled yearning, and an original ebulliency of spirit
had urged to the investigation of the indwelling and living ground of all things. These then, because their names had never been enrolled
in the guilds of the learned, were persecuted by the registered
liverymen as interlopers on their rights and privileges. A l l without
distinction were branded as fanatics and phantasts... [such a man's] meditations are almost inevitably employed on the eternal or the
everlasting, for 'the world is not his friend nor the world's law.' [PL 327-9]
W e are b a c k to the conflict between a p p e a r a n c e a n d reality again, a n d Coleridge's distrust o f the ' m e r e Facts' m e n over a g a i n s t t h e m e t a p h y s i c i a n s , o f t h e p r o f e s s i o n a l s as a g a i n s t t h e i m a g i n a t i v e a m a t e u r s . O n e m a y safely c o n c l u d e t h a t C o l e ridge chose his intellectual heroes a n d allies, i f B e h m e n , 8
Paracelsus,
and Bruno
are a fair
cross-section,
for their
d a r i n g , their d o u b t i n g , a n d for the general snobbish a n d frightened
neglect o f their magnitude. H e saw the same
p h e n o m e n o n i n his o w n day, w h e n his interest was stirred b y 8 He himself named them, among others better known: Lessing, Schiller, Kant, Sidney, Shakespeare, Milton, Dante, Ariosto, Pascal, inter alios. 48
s u c h n o t o r i o u s l y u n a c c e p t a b l e t y p e s as M e s m e r , o r S p u r z h e i m . O n e c o u l d n a m e m a n y others, b u t I s h o u l d l i k e to refer briefly
to these, c h i e f l y to c a l l a t t e n t i o n
to the
common
d e n o m i n a t o r i n C o l e r i d g e ' s responses. H o w m u c h is i t n e c e s s a r y a t t h i s t i m e o f d a y t o d e s c r i b e M e s m e r o r m e s m e r i s m - the sort o f subject w e a l l k n o w a b o u t , yet perhaps d o n ' t really k n o w ? M e s m e r , w h o d i e d i n 1815, practised a p s e u d o - h y p n o t i s m n a m e d after h i m - a l t e r n a t i v e l y c a l l e d ' a n i m a l m a g n e t i s m . ' H e h a d first b e e n a n a s t r o l o g e r , a n d s e e m s t o h a v e h a d s o m e sort o f
fixation
o n the concept o f c o s m i c m a g n e t i s m
i m p o n d e r a b l e influences. H e practised i n P a r i s for
and about
t h i r t y years, a n d attracted m a n y followers i n a n d outside the m e d i c a l profession, b o t h i n F r a n c e a n d i n G e r m a n y . T h e E n g l i s h g e n e r a l l y r e g a r d e d h i m w i t h s t o l i d ( o r s o l i d , as y o u w i l l ) d i s b e l i e f , a n d i t is i n d e e d d i f f i c u l t t o i m a g i n e L o n d o n e r s s i t t i n g , i n s e a n c e - l i k e sessions, as t h e P a r i s i a n s d i d , h o l d i n g hands i n a circle a r o u n d a c a u l d r o n full of some witches' b r e w w h i l e M e s m e r , i n m a g i c i a n ' s robes,
floated
among
them,
g e s t u r i n g , t o u c h i n g , fixing w i t h h i s g l i t t e r i n g e y e t h i s o r t h a t h y s t e r i c a l patient. S c a n d a l o u s stories m o u n t e d to the p o i n t w h e r e the F r e n c h g o v e r n m e n t asked B e n j a m i n F r a n k l i n a n d o t h e r scientists to investigate. T h e r e s u l t i n g r e p o r t was i n c o n c l u s i v e as t o t h e c h a r l a t a n i s m , a c c r e d i t i n g s o m e o f t h e facts and
entirely r e p u d i a t i n g M e s m e r ' s theories
of
magnetic
??????? ??? ??????? ?? ???????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ? genuine m y s t i c w h o b e l i e v e d i n his personal m a g n e t i c powers o v e r diseased persons. C o l e r i d g e d i d not k n o w M e s m e r ; his
first
acquaintance
w i t h the w r i t i n g s o f mesmerists seems to h a v e b e e n t h r o u g h OA.
K l u g e ' s s u r v e y Versuch einer Darstellung
Magnetismus,
ah Heilmittel
des
animalischen
(1815) a n d for the next decade he
r e a d w i d e l y i n the G e r m a n literature o n the subject.
49
T h e r e w a s n o d o u b t a personal interest i n the question w h e t h e r i n c e r t a i n s o m a t o s e c o n d i t i o n s , h y p n o t i c states o f a sort, o n e p e r s o n c o u l d i n f l u e n c e a n o t h e r . O n t h e front
fly-leaf
of K l u g e Coleridge wrote: Allowing the least possible to Fancy and Exaggeration, I can yet find
nothing in the Cases collected by Dr. Kluge that requires any other
conclusion but this-that under certain conditions one human Being may so act on the body as well as on the mind of another-as to produce a morbid sleep, from which the Brain awakes, while the
organs of sense remain in stupor. I speak exclusively of the intellectual
phaenomena of Anfimal] Mag[netism]. That the same vis ab extra may act medically, there is no reason to doubt - any more than of the
effects of opium. Thus the modus agendi in the first instance, the instrument thro' which the Magnetiser operates, is the only mystery:
and on this neither Kluge nor any of his Predecessors have thrown a ray of Light. [IS § 32]
S o ' M a g n e t i s m ' m a y act m e d i c a l l y - rather like o p i u m . W a s Coleridge's b u r n i n g question w h e t h e r a n addict c o u l d be treated? I n a m a n u s c r i p t fragment i n the British M u s e u m , p r o b a b l y i n t e n d e d for a n article o n a n i m a l m a g n e t i s m , he wrote: ' W h e n c e the c o n t e m p t u o u s rejection o f a n i m a l m a g n e t i s m before a n d w i t h o u t e x a m i n a t i o n ? ' G o i n g o n to r e d u c e the h u b b u b to fundamentals, . . . T h e only position... asserted by Magnetists as Magnetists inde
pendent of all particular theory, or explanation)... is, that the will
or... the vis vitae of M a n is not confined in its operations to the Organic Body, in which it appears to be seated; but under certain
previously defined Conditions of distance and position, and above all
of the relation of the Patient to the Agent and of the Agent to the Patient, is capable of acting and producing certain pre-defined Effects on the living human bodies external to it. 50
C o l e r i d g e goes i n t o p a r t i c u l a r s o f m e s m e r i c t r e a t m e n t s
in
some d e t a i l , a n d c o n c l u d e s that M e s m e r gave honest v a l u e for money, a n d was the v i c t i m o f i n c o m p l e t e a n d biased evidence a n d gossip. For myself, I shall even say - 1 will try it when I have the opportunity,
myself - I will endeavour to see it tried by others, when I c a n - a n d
till then I will be neutral - S.T. Coleridge, July 8th, 1817.
[IS § 30]
C o l e r i d g e ' s a t t i t u d e to m e s m e r i s m o s c i l l a t e d b e t w e e n pros a n d c o n s ; h e w a s as q u i c k t o s p o t q u a c k s as t h e n e x t o n e , a n d d i d n o t s p a r e t h e m . T h e i n t e r e s t i n g t h i n g is t h a t i n t h e t e e t h o f a great d e a l o f p o p u l a r m o c k e r y o f it, h e insisted o n p u r s u i n g s e r i o u s l y a s u b j e c t so c l o s e l y r e l a t e d t o o b s c u r e s u b t e r r a n e a n b o d i l y a n d m e n t a l processes, a n a r e a i n w h i c h e v e n his friends w e r e i g n o r a n t a n d p r e j u d i c e d , as h e w e l l k n e w f r o m p e r s o n a l experience. S p u r z h e i m (1776-1832) was a n o t h e r c o n t e m p o r a r y m e d i c a l w i l d m a n a b o u t w h o m C o l e r i d g e ' s views were also w o b bly, t h o u g h o n his g e n e r a l p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r i n c i p l e s C o l e r i d g e c o u l d h a r d l y s u p p o r t so p h y s i c a l a b a s i s f o r m i n d as S p u r z heim's theories i m p l i e d . S p u r z h e i m astonished the w o r l d b y c l a i m i n g to be a b l e to d e s c r i b e a person's a b i l i t i e s a n d m o r a l c h a r a c t e r b y m e a s u r i n g the size, shape, a n d c o n v o l u t i o n s o f his
skull.
But
the
fact
that
A b e r n e t h y was
favourably
impressed w i t h S p u r z h e i m ' s dissection a n d a n a t o m y o f the b r a i n must have given C o l e r i d g e pause. H i s first n o t e (CN III 4 2 6 9 ) o n S p u r z h e i m ' s
Physiognomical
System w a s d e r o g a t o r y o f t h e w h o l e w o r k , its l a n g u a g e , l o g i c , a n d taste, b u t t w o y e a r s l a t e r a n o t e b o o k e n t r y begins:
August, 1817.1 have since discovered that poor Spurzheim entrusted
his Mss to a Scotch M a n , a M u r r a y I believe-& that no fair
conception can be formed from the B o o k either of the System as 51
presented in Spurzheim's Lectures, or of the M a n , of whom all without exception who have known him, speak of with love and honor-Spurzheim is a true man, und ein biederer Teut[s]cher. - H e has been driven out of the K i n g d o m to Paris by the malignity and malignant ignorance of Scotchmen / O n e Gordon and the Edingburgh R e v i e w - A t present I think that Spurzheim is beyond all comparison the greatest Physiognomist that has ever appeared - that his intellectual yvcofiovec, or indices have stood the test of application to an astonishing number of Instances with a most imposing co incidence-of the moral Indices I have not the same favorable impression - and his Theory, which is perfectly separable from his Empeiria, I cannot bring into any consistency of meaning. \CN III 4355] S p u r z h e i m ' s e x a m i n a t i o n o f C o l e r i d g e ' s b u m p s l e d to a n a m u s i n g P.S. i n a l e t t e r t o h i s f r i e n d G r e e n i n w h i c h h e r e f e r r e d t o ' t h e l i t t l e less t h a n i d i o c y o f t h a t s a m e f a c u l t y o f L o c a l i t y , the size, p r o m i n e n c e , a n d u n u s u a l d e v e l o p m e n t o f the significant B u m p - o r g a n o f w h i c h attracted the notice a n d excited the a d m i r a t i o n
o f P r o f e s s o r Spurzheim,
w h o consoled
me
t h e r e w i t h for the w a n t , o r evanescence, o f the O r g a n o f Ideality or Imagination.'
9
C o l e r i d g e c o n t i n u e d for some years to r e a d S p u r z h e i m ' s a n n o u n c e m e n t s o f d i s c o v e r i e s a b o u t t h e b r a i n , as l a t e n o t e b o o k entries show, a n d to p o k e f u n o r disagree b u t a l w a y s to be i n f o r m e d a b o u t the controversies, a n d to distrust the clack a g a i n s t S p u r z h e i m , b e c a u s e , as h e h a d s a i d , ... were it only for the undoubted splendor and originality of his & Gall's Anatomical Discoveries as to the structure of the Brain-the clear Light thrown on the true state of the Brain in Hydrokephalos - he ought to have been answered, where answerable, with honor 9 /S§27n 52
& quiet detail of logical objections. O n e thing seems plain / that
even if his System be true, it must constitute a profession - & why not? Is it not so with Medicine? Every man of Talent can learn from books the theory of Medicine; but from practical experience of his own must he acquire the power of safely applying it. [ C V III 4355]
I t is n o w r e c o g n i z e d t h a t S p u r z h e i m , f o r a l l h i s e x t r a v a g a n ces, d i d i m p e r f e c t l y d i s c o v e r s o m e t r u e facts a b o u t t h e b r a i n , e.g. t h a t i t is n o t j u s t a p u l p y m a s s , b u t fibrous, a n d t h a t h i s talk about
localization o f function, while inaccurate, was
crudely prophetic o f things to come. T h e reasons a r e b y n o w p r o b a b l y a p p a r e n t for b r i n g i n g t o g e t h e r s u c h a w e i r d a s s o r t m e n t o f e c c e n t r i c s as B e h m e n , P a r a c e l s u s , B r u n o , M e s m e r , S p u r z h e i m - a n d t h e m o n l y as representative o f a legion o f o t h e r s - w i t h i n the bracket o f C o l e r i d g e ' s i n t e r e s t . I t is n o t o n l y t h a t b y t e m p e r a m e n t a n d out o f his o w n miseries h e t e n d e d to b e c o m e c o u n s e l for the defence o f originals, oddities, a n d outcasts. W i t h B e h m e n ' s p a n t h e i s t v i e w s as w i t h t h e P a r a c e l s i a n b r a s h n e s s a n d i n c o n sistency he w a s i n p r o f o u n d disagreement; b y B r u n o he w a s mystified, awesomely, b y the difficulty o f his w r i t i n g a n d the immense reach o f m i n d ; b y M e s m e r a n d S p u r z h e i m he was a l s o m y s t i f i e d , f o r o t h e r r e a s o n s a n d less a w e s o m e l y . O n e sees, however, that w i t h o r w i t h o u t rational agreement o r emotional concern, he discussed a fellow-author o r prophet w i t h a n a m a z i n g c a p a c i t y f o r p e n e t r a t i o n t o t h e b a s i c issues, w h a t e v e r t h e subject. G o l d w a s s e p a r a t e d f r o m dross i n e a c h case. I n a d d i t i o n , w i t h less t h a n n o i n t e r e s t i n f a d s a n d f a n c i e s , there w a s i n C o l e r i d g e a sceptical resistance o n the o n e h a n d to t h e p r e j u d i c e s o f p r o f e s s i o n a l e s t a b l i s h m e n t s , a n d o n t h e other to the too-glib pre-judgements b y the p u b l i c o f n e w c o n c e p t s o f m e n d u b b e d V i s i o n a r i e s . ' W h a t is t o o l i t t l e c r e d i t e d t o C o l e r i d g e is a f i n e c a p a c i t y f o r a n i n d i v i d u a l p r o v i sional, tentative judgement. 53
He
f u l l y r e a l i z e d t h a t the i m a g i n a t i v e m i n d w h e r e v e r it
performs, i n philosophy, o r science, o r religion o r politics o r art, w i l l be d i s t u r b i n g . A s the painter, S a m u e l P a l m e r , C o l e ridge's c o n t e m p o r a r y , knew, I m a g i n a t i o n frightens people. B u t C o l e r i d g e was a c h i p off the o l d b l o c k - a n d i f one m a y p a r o d y C h u r c h i l l , some chip, some block. F o r o l d J o h n C o l e r i d g e , i n the 1750s before S a m u e l T a y l o r C o l e r i d g e w a s b o r n , said i n defending the prophet M i c a h against the charge o f idolatry, ' P e r h a p s the p o w e r of vision i n the prophets m a y be . . . a n e w p o w e r o f t h e m i n d , o r a n e w sense a w a k e n e d i n t h e m . ' S T C ' s l o y a l t y to l e a r n i n g a n d t r u t h w a s absolute, b u t
1 0
like
father, like son, he y e a r n e d for a n d defended m e n w i t h ' p o w ers o f v i s i o n . ' I n the next lecture I s h a l l a t t e m p t to say s o m e t h i n g a b o u t C o l e r i d g e ' s o w n p o e t i c a n d p h i l o s o p h i c i m a g i n a t i o n , espec i a l l y as s e e n i n t h e n o t e b o o k s .
10 E H C in 'Biographical Notes' in Coleridge: Studies by Several Hands &c ed Edmund Blunden and Earl Leslie Griggs (1934) 9 54
LECTURE
THREE
This page intentionally left blank
LECTURETHREE
' I L L I A M P A L E Y , one o f those e i g h t e e n t h - c e n t u r y d i v i n e s
Ww h o s e c a s t o f m i n d C o l e r i d g e h a d n o t m u c h use for, h a d
a h a b i t he called 'skirmishing.' H e h a d a voracious appetite, and
it seems t h a t w h e n he h a d e a t e n e v e r y t h i n g o n the t a b l e
he m a d e raids o n the side dishes. T h i s he c a l l e d ' s k i r m i s h i n g . ' S o m e o f y o u I d a r e say h a v e b e e n t h i n k i n g that a l l w e h a v e b e e n d o i n g is s k i r m i s h i n g a n d m a y b e w o n d e r i n g a b o u t t h e m a i n c o u r s e s . I t is I s u p p o s e t h e g e n e r a l v i e w t h a t t h o s e a r e the poems, the l i t e r a r y c r i t i c i s m , p e r h a p s the p h i l o s o p h y . I s h a l l s a y s o m e t h i n g a b o u t these, b u t I s h o u l d l i k e a l s o t o describe i f I c a n w h a t i n t h a t g l i t t e r i n g eye has h e l d m e w i t h the v i c t i m i z e d W e d d i n g G u e s t s i t t i n g o n t h a t stone b e a t i n g my
breast for m o r e t h a n forty years. May We
I recapitulate briefly? h a v e l o o k e d at a d e v e l o p i n g s c e p t i c i s m i n C o l e r i d g e ' s
c h i l d h o o d a n d y o u t h , based o n a m o r e t h a n u s u a l l y sensitive and
disillusioning conflict
outward appearance
i n h i m b e t w e e n a sense o f t h e
o f things a n d i n n e r experiences - the
f a m i l y not f a m i l i a l , the c h u r c h not a l w a y s religious, society o f t e n a n t i - s o c i a l i n a n y r e s p o n s i b l e sense, a n d p o l i t i c a l E n g l a n d w a v i n g banners o f self-righteous freedom against
the
F r e n c h a b r o a d a n d i n t r o d u c i n g t h e g a g g i n g b i l l s a n d susp e n d i n g the H a b e a s C o r p u s A c t at h o m e . S o the d e v e l o p m e n t of
radical
critical
protest-against
family,
university,
the
established c h u r c h , a n d a repressive g o v e r n m e n t was inevitable,
healthy a n d active.
A l o n g s i d e the doubts a n d negations there was, however, a positive reaching out towards radical thinkers o f other times and
c o u n t r i e s w h o , o u t o f their i s o l a t i o n a n d c o n f l i c t s , p u l l e d
C o l e r i d g e ' s m i n d o u t t o w a r d s w i d e r , less i n s u l a r h o r i z o n s -
towards E u r o p e - towards other disciplines, a n d other ways o f t h i n k i n g . T h e y c h a l l e n g e d h i m , as t h e
eighteenth-century
E n g l i s h schools a n d universities o f his d a y w i t h t h e i r l i m i t e d classical emphasis a n d standards w o u l d never h a v e d o n e - to pursue the interrelatedness o f a l l h u m a n e studies. It w a s n o d o u b t a p a r t o f t h e i r a t t r a c t i o n for h i m that his favourite
'revolutionary minds' all thought
a n d at
times
w r o t e poetically. T h e i r l a n g u a g e was often, to the d e t r i m e n t o f t h e i r p o p u l a r i t y , p o e t i c a l , a n d s o m e sort o f i m a g i n a t i v e resolution o f e x t e r n a l a n d i n t e r n a l was to be f o u n d i n their w o r k . S o t h o u g h i n the last l e c t u r e w e w e r e w a t c h i n g i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o c e s s e s t h a t h a d s c i e n t i f i c g o a l s as w e l l , w e h a v e n e v e r been far a w a y f r o m the poet. T h e poet a n d the p h i l o s o p h e r i n C o l e r i d g e were one a n d t h e s a m e m a n . S o m e p r o f e s s i o n a l p h i l o s o p h e r s w i l l s a y t h a t is just w h a t was w r o n g w i t h his p h i l o s o p h y . H o w e v e r that m a y b e , i t is t i m e w e s t o p p e d d i v i d i n g C o l e r i d g e i n t o d e p a r t m e n t s as i f h e w e r e a u n i v e r s i t y . H e c o i n e d t h e w o r d ' i n t e r p e n e t r a t i o n ' a n d t h o u g h h e d i d n o t a p p l y it to his o w n closely i n t e r c o m m u n i c a t i n g sensibilities a n d thoughts, w e s h o u l d d o w e l l so t o a p p l y i t . F i r s t o f a l l m a y I c a t e g o r i c a l l y d e n y the o l d stuff a n d nonsense a b o u t the m e t a p h y s i c i a n h a v i n g k i l l e d the poet i n C o l e r i d g e . I t h o u g h t n o o n e n o w e n t e r t a i n e d t h a t baseless, psychologically u n s o u n d piece of perversity since S i r E d m u n d Chambers propagated
it i n his h o s t i l e b i o g r a p h y , b u t
it
t u r n e d u p i n a r e v i e w just the other day. T h e poet d i e d o n 25 J u l y 1 8 3 4 , w i t h a l l h i s o t h e r d e p a r t m e n t s . I t is t r u e h i s v e r s i f y i n g e n e r g y d i m i n i s h e d after 1802, r o u g h l y after the t r i u m p h of Dejection: An Ode, t h o u g h t h e r e w e r e s o m e fine l a t e r s p u r t s a f t e r t h a t . W e d o n o t r e a d o f t e n e n o u g h p o e m s l i k e The Pang More
Sharp than All,
Time,
Real
& Imaginary,
Work without Hope, Love's Apparition
Youth &
& Evanishment,
Age,
a n d the
i n t e r e s t i n g Garden of Boccaccio, t h o u g h a d m i t t e d l y s o m e o f t h e 58
t i t l e s t h e m s e l v e s s u g g e s t a n o s t a l g i a f o r s o m e t h i n g lost. B u t t a k e f o r i n s t a n c e t h e terse l i n e s e n t i t l e d Song - h a v e t h e s e n o t some o f M e r e d i t h ' s s h a r p bitterness? Though veiled in spires of myrtle-wreath, Love is a sword which cuts its sheath,
A n d through the clefts itself has made,
We spy the flashes of the blade.
But through the clefts itself has made
We likewise see love's flashing blade,
By rust consumed, or snapt in twain;
A n d only hilt and stump remain. T h a t was w r i t t e n i n 1825.
S o f a r as t h e p o e t d i d w i t h e r , it w a s f r o m p e r s o n a l m i s e r y c o m b i n e d w i t h t h e d e s t r u c t i v e effects o f o p i u m a d d i c t i o n a n d its p h y s i c a l a n d n e u r a l a c c o m p a n i m e n t s . I n 1801 i t is t r u e h e h a d s a i d , ' T h e P o e t is d e a d i n m e - m y i m a g i n a t i o n ( o r r a t h e r t h e S o m e w h a t t h a t h a d b e e n i m a g i n a t i v e ) lies, l i k e a G o l d S n u f f o n the c i r c u l a r R i m o f a Brass Candle-stick, w i t h o u t e v e n a stink o f T a l l o w to r e m i n d y o u that it w a s o n c e c l o a t h e d & m i t r e d w i t h F l a m e . T h a t is p a s t b y ! '
1
B u t t h a t w a s a letter to G o d w i n i n w h i c h he d e s c r i b e d a t h r e e m o n t h s ' i l l n e s s w i t h r h e u m a t i c f e v e r . ( I t is r e f e r r e d t o i n o t h e r letters also.) I fear, your Tragedy [Godwin had sent him an unsuccessful play for criticism] will find me in a very unfit state of mind to sit in Judgement
on it. I have been, during the last 3 months, undergoing a process of
intellectual exsiccation. In my long Illness I had compelled into hours of
Delight many a sleepless, painful hour of Darkness by chasing down 1 25 M a r c h 1801 to Godwin: CL II 713-14
59
metaphysical Game - and since then I have continued the Hunt, till I
found myself unaware at the Root of Pure Mathematics - and up that tall smooth Tree, whose few poor Branches are all at it's very summit,
am I climbing by pure adhesive strength of arms and thighs-still
slipping down, still renewing my ascent. - You would not know me - !
all sounds of similitude keep at such a distance from each other in my
mind, that I have forgotten how to make a r h y m e - I look at the Mountains (that visible G o d Almighty that looks in at all my win
dows) I look at the Mountains only for the Curves of their outlines; the
Stars, as I behold them, form themselves into Triangles-and my
hands are scarred with scratches from a Cat, whose back I was rubbing
in the Dark in order to see whether the sparks from it were refrangible
b y a Prism. T h e Poet is dead in me -
H e adds that he w i l l d o w h a t he c a n b u t Taste and Feeling have I none, but what I have, give I unto thee. But I repeat, that I am unfit to decide on any but works of severe
Logic.
T h i s has b e e n sometimes r e a d i n the o l d fallacious w a y , ' c u m h o c e r g o p r o p t e r h o c , ' b u t C o l e r i d g e c l e a r l y t e l l s us h i m s e l f , i f w e t a k e h i m s e r i o u s l y , w h e r e t h e t r u t h lies. W h e r e a s m e t a p h y s i c a l a n d l o g i c a l ' g a m e ' c o u l d b e p u r s u e d as a n escape f r o m p h y s i c a l p a i n a n d p e r s o n a l anxieties i n those unhappy
months in Greta
Hall,
he then c o u l d
neither
r e s p o n d fully to n a t u r a l b e a u t y n o r c o p e w i t h the e m o t i o n a l involvement i n m a k i n g poems. T h e w e a r a n d tear o f the 'visitations' of'afflictions' h a d been too great. ' T h e Poet,' he w a s to say later o n , after the destructive e x p e r i e n c e s o f m a n y such miseries, 'the poet calls the w h o l e soul o f m a n into activity.'
2
2 Biographia Literaria c h XIV 60
T h e notion that philosophy killed the poet arose i n part
from the letter to G o d w i n , a n d i n part f r o m that lovely p o e m ,
Dejection. A t the b e g i n n i n g of the p o e m he watches the evening sky a n d longs for the o n c o m i n g storm as a relief from his o w n
'heartless m o o d . ' I quote some lines from the first version o f the p o e m as sent to S a r a H u t c h i n s o n . (Note that the w o r d
genial in Coleridge's use means h a v i n g to do w i t h his o w n self or nature - it does not refer to a h i g h o p i n i o n o f himself as a
genius, n o r to geniality; note also how the p o e m moves b a c k a n d forth between outer a n d inner worlds.)
in M y genial spirits fail;
A n d what can these avail
T o lift the smothering weight from off my breast? It were a vain endeavor,
Though I should gaze for ever
O n that green light that lingers in the west! I may not hope from outward forms to win
T h e passion and the life, whose fountains are within! In the next stanza a poet's need of a n inner strength is u n d e r
lined. (I shall irritate those w h o k n o w the p o e m well b y
selecting certain lines.)
IV
A h ! from the soul itself must issue forth
A light, a glory, a fair luminous cloud Enveloping the Earth -
A n d from the soul itself must there be sent A sweet and potent voice, of its own birth,
O f all sweet sounds the life and element! 61
V
O pure of heart! thou need'st not ask of me
What this strong music in the soul may be! What, and wherein it doth exist,
This light, this glory, this fair luminous mist, This beautiful and beauty-making power.
Joy, virtuous Lady! Joy that ne'er was given,
Save to the pure, and in their purest hour,
Life and Life's effluence, cloud at once and shower,
Joy, Lady! is the spirit and the power,
W h i c h wedding Nature to us gives in dower A new Earth and new Heaven,
Undreamt of by the sensual and the proud -
Joy is the sweet voice, Joy the luminous cloud We in ourselves rejoice!
A n d thence flows all that charms or ear or sight, A l l melodies the echoes of that voice,
A l l colours a suffusion from that light. VI
There was a time when, though my path was rough, This joy within me dallied with distress, A n d all misfortunes were but as the stuff Whence Fancy made me dreams of happiness: For hope grew round me, like the twining vine, A n d fruits, and foliage, not my own, seemed mine. But now afflictions bow me down to earth: Nor care I that they rob me of my mirth; But oh! each visitation Suspends what nature gave me at my birth, M y shaping spirit of Imagination. For not to think of what I needs must feel, But to be still and patient, all I can; 62
A n d haply by abstruse research to steal
From my own nature all the natural man -
This was my sole resource, my only plan:
T i l l that which suits a part infects the whole,
A n d now is almost grown the habit of my soul.
3
T h e 'abstruse research' was the m a t h e m a t i c a l a n d m e t a p h y s i c a l g a m e r e f e r r e d t o i n t h e l e t t e r t o G o d w i n as a r e s o u r c e a g a i n s t sleeplessness, b u t ' t h e n a t u r a l m a n , ' as t h e first v e r y p e r s o n a l v e r s i o n o f the p o e m m a k e s clear, w a s the flesh a n d b l o o d m a n i n hopeless love w i t h S a r a H u t c h i n s o n , u n m i s t a k a b l y the o l d A d a m . N o t o n l y d i d m e t a p h y s i c a l ideas not destroy the poet, they a r e a c t u a l l y i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e p o e m , w h i c h is u n h a r m e d as p o e t r y b y n o t i c i n g t h a t s e v e r a l l i n e s a r e a n a n t i c i p a t i o n o f a c e n t r a l tenet o f C o l e r i d g e ' s t h i n k i n g , the i d e a o f w h a t
he
c a l l e d 'the i n i t i a t i v e . ' F o r a d y n a m i c v i t a l i s m like his, the b a s i c p r i n c i p l e o f a l l life w a s a m y s t e r i o u s e n e r g y b e h i n d a l l creation not
to be sufficiently e x p l a i n e d b y a n y
material
science. T h e same i n i t i a t i v e energy was the m e n t a l a n d e m o t i o n a l a n t e c e d e n t necessary to the c r e a t i o n o f a p o e m , o r a n y w o r k o f art: A h from the soul itself must issue forth A light, a glory...
a n d so o n . T h e g r e a t t h i n g a b o u t t h a t p o e m is t h a t it w a s w r i t t e n a t a l l . T h e v e r y m o m e n t o f s u f f e r i n g t h e sense o f t h e d e a t h o f p o e t r y i n h i m s e l f is m a d e i n t o a g l o w i n g p o e m , i n w h i c h t h e last s t a n z a is a m a r v e l l o u s t r i u m p h o f o u t - g o i n g selfless l o v e over inward-looking despair 3 George Whalley Coleridge and Sara Hutchinson and the Asra Poems (1955) 165-8 63
VIII
'Tis midnight, but small thoughts have I of sleep: Full seldom may my friend such vigils keep!
Visit her, gentle Sleep! with wings of healing,
A n d may this storm be but a mountain-birth,
M a y all the stars hang bright above her dwelling,
Silent as though they watched the sleeping Earth! W i t h light heart may she rise, Gay fancy, cheerful eyes,
Joy lift her spirit, joy attune her voice;
T o her may all things live, from pole to pole, Their life the eddying of her living soul!... O simple spirit, guided from above,
Dear Lady! friend devoutest of my choice,
Thus mayest thou ever, evermore rejoice. Much
has b e e n w r i t t e n a b o u t
Christabel.
the failure to
complete
W o r d s w o r t h c l a i m e d t h a t it w a s b e c a u s e C o l e r i d g e
d i d n ' t k n o w h o w to e n d it, whereas G i l l m a n records finished
the
s t o r y as C o l e r i d g e t o l d i t t o h i m ; W o r d s w o r t h h a s h a d
the larger a u d i e n c e despite C o l e r i d g e ' s positive statements to t h e c o n t r a r y . T h e p r o b a b l e t r u t h is s u g g e s t e d i n a l a t e n o t e b o o k entry, w r i t t e n o n his b i r t h d a y i n O c t o b e r 1823. ( N o t a m o n t h for s w i m m i n g , except for the resolute.) H e h a d j u s t h a d a b a t h e i n t h e sea a t R a m s g a t e a n d ' f e l t t h e b e n e f i t . . . W e r e I free t o d o so, I feel as i f I c o u l d c o m p o s e t h e t h i r d p a r t o f Christabel,
o r the song o f her desolation' ( N o t e b o o k 30).
B u t he c o u l d not w r i t e the song o f her desolation, i f m y surmises are correct, because he was identified a l l too personally w i t h that desolation. H e was u n a b l e to achieve that degree o f d e t a c h m e n t he k n e w w a s necessary to the w r i t i n g o f p o e t r y - a n d w h i c h h e so e l o q u e n t l y a d m i r e d i n S h a k e s p e a r e . T h e p r o p o s e d e n d i n g o f c a n t o s f o u r a n d five w a s i m p o s s i b l e to h i m for the o p p o s i t e reason. It w a s to h a v e b e e n a sort o f 64
All's
Well That Ends Well, w i t h t h e r e t u r n o f C h r i s t a b e P s l o v e r ,
the defeat o f the spirits o f e v i l , a n d a r e c o n c i l i a t i o n b e t w e e n father
and
daughter-in
short
a restoration generally of
broken h u m a n relationships. T h a t was a n e n d i n g conceivable i n his o w n hopes i n 1798, b u t n o w t w e n t y - f i v e years l a t e r it was not one w i t h w h i c h he c o u l d identify himself. S o neither sufficient d e t a c h m e n t o n the one h a n d , n o r the r i g h t k i n d o f h a p p y e m p a t h y o n the other, was present. The
c h a n g e i n m o o d i n f l i c t e d b y t h e y e a r s is p e r f e c t l y
s y m b o l i z e d i n w h a t h a p p e n e d t o t h e i m a g e o f t h e s i n g l e leaf. I suppose
the
most v i v i d
s y m b o l for C h r i s t a b e l herself i n
e v e r y o n e ' s m e m o r y is ' t h e o n e r e d l e a f T h e one red leaf, the last of its clan
That dances as often as dance it can.
Hanging so light, and hanging so high
O n the topmost twig that looks up at the sky. T h a t w a s w r i t t e n i n 1 7 9 8 . I n t h e s i n g l e d a n c i n g leaf, t h e n , a n d the u p w a r d l o o k to the sky, there w a s a b r i g h t n e s s e v e n i n the r h y t h m i n contrast to the sinister portent o f the evil a b o u t to c a u s e C h r i s t a b e f s d e s o l a t i o n . A q u i t e d i f f e r e n t s i n g l e leaf, i n p r o s e a d e c a d e l a t e r , is i n s t r u c t i v e . A p o o r f o r s a k e n g i r l h a s e n d u r e d three nights of hunger, solitude, a n d exposure, a n d f i n a l l y finds t e m p o r a r y s h e l t e r : As when a withered Leaf, that has been long whirled about by the
gusts of Autumn, is blown into a Cave or hollow Tree, it stops suddenly, and all at once looks the very image of quiet. Such might this poor O r p h a n appear to the eye of a meditative imagination. When
C o l e r i d g e wrote the
4 Friend {CQ II 178 65
first p a r t
o f Christabel
4
the
o u t w a r d - g a z i n g m e d i t a t i v e i m a g i n a t i o n was the same e x u b e r a n t ' s h a p i n g s p i r i t ' w h i c h i n f o r m e d The Ancient
Mariner.
T e n years later the single leaf was a w i t h e r e d one, c a u g h t i n a c a v e o r t h e h o l l o w o f a tree; a c a s u a l d e a t h . A m o n g E n g l i s h poets I w o n d e r if C o l e r i d g e has a n e q u a l i n the a b i l i t y (even i n a r e d u c e d state o f c r e a t i v i t y ) to seize u p o n the s i m p l e , c o n c r e t e , a p p o s i t e i m a g e w h i c h so d e e p l y c h a r g e s t h o u g h t f e e l i n g as t o b e c o m e a s y m b o l o f e x t e n s i v e
and
range?
T h i s a b i l i t y t o see t h e c o n c r e t e o b j e c t i n s i g n i f i c a n t p o e t i c a l terms-to
absorb a n d be a b s o r b e d
i n the w o r l d o f nature
sufficiently to a r t i c u l a t e it o b j e c t i v e l y a n d m u s i c a l l y , m a d e h i m t h e p o e t o f The Ancient systaltic m o v e m e n t
Mariner.
T h e r e the
perpetual
b e t w e e n the M a r i n e r ' s i n n e r w o r l d o f
g u i l t , fear, r e m o r s e , p e n i t e n c e , disgust, u t t e r loneliness, a n d t h e w o r l d o f t h e e l e m e n t s ; t h e sea, t h e s t o r m - b l a s t , t h e i c e m a s t - h i g h , the fog, the t y r a n n o u s s u n a n d the a w f u l t r o p i c a l c a l m a n d d r o u g h t - as I s a y t h e a l t e r n a t i n g b a c k a n d f o r t h m o v e m e n t b e t w e e n t h e s e is e l o q u e n t o f t h a t r e c o n c i l e m e n t o f t h e i n t e r n a l w i t h t h e e x t e r n a l w h i c h is o n e o f C o l e r i d g e ' s descriptions o f art. I s u p p o s e h a r d l y a n y o n e w i l l d e n y t h a t i n The Rime of the Ancient Mariner and
outer
the r e c o n c i l i a t i o n o f the oppositions o f i n n e r
w o r l d s does m a r v e l l o u s l y take
place,
however
m u c h w e m i g h t differ a b o u t the full m e a n i n g o f the resolut i o n s . B u t I find i t d i f f i c u l t t o a s s e n t t o C a s s i r e r ' s m o r e g e n e r a l point, that ' T o poeticize p h i l o s o p h y a n d to p h i l o s o p h i z e poet r y . . . was the highest a i m o f a l l the r o m a n t i c thinkers.' W h a t is p o e t i c i z e d i n t h e Ancient
Mariner
(a r a t h e r
disagreeable
w o r d , poeticize a n d u n C o l e r i d g i a n ) is e x p e r i e n c e o f life, n o t a p h i l o s o p h i c a l theory. I n a b r i l l i a n t chapter (in a book w i t h w h i c h I must disagree otherwise a g o o d deal) E l i s a b e t h S c h n e i d e r writes i l l u m i n a t i n g l y o n t h e m u s i c a n d m y s t e r y oiKubla Kubla
Khan
Khan. S h e says t h a t
presents n o reconciliations b u t o n l y ' " o s c i l l a 66
t i o n " , perfectly poeticized, a n d possibly ironically c o m m e m orative o f the a u t h o r . '
5
N o w t h e last p h r a s e - ' " o s c i l l a t i o n " ... p o s s i b l y i r o n i c a l l y c o m m e m o r a t i v e o f the a u t h o r ' delivers the k i n d o f thrust at C o l e r i d g e that a d m i r e r s o f H a z l i t t are prone to - the charge o f incompleteness, indeflniteness, o r oscillation, w h a t e v e r one w i s h e s t o c a l l i t . A n d t h e c h a r g e b e i t n o t e d is l e v e l l e d u s u a l l y n o t so m u c h a g a i n s t t h e C o l e r i d g e w h o w r o t e p o e m s - e x c e p t f o r t h e o n e s h e d i d n ' t w r i t e o r c o m p l e t e - as a g a i n s t h i s m i n d , his w o r k i n general, his t o l e r a n c e o f his o w n inconclusiveness, h i s t e n d e n c y t o i n q u i r e a n d t h e n t o set a s i d e t h e o r i g i n a l q u e s t i o n for another, a n d another. H i s l a c k o f system a d m i t t e d l y is i r r i t a t i n g t o c e r t a i n t e m p e r s , p e r h a p s e s p e c i a l l y t o t h e c u r r i c u l u m - m a k i n g a c a d e m i c m i n d . A n d C o l e r i d g e is s h a m e less a b o u t i t . I n a m a n u s c r i p t f r a g m e n t h e r e c o r d e d : ... Southey once said to me: You are nosing every nettle along the
Hedge, while the Greyhound (meaning himself, I presume) wants only to get sight of the Hare and Flash - strait as a line! he has it in his mouth! - Even so, I replied, might a Cannibal say to an Anatomist,
whom he had watched dissecting a body. But the fact is -1 do not care
two pence for the Hare; but I value most highly the excellencies of
scent, patience, discrimination, free Activity; and find a Hare in every Nettle I make myself acquainted with. I follow the Chamois-
Hunters, and seem to set out with the same Object. But I am no
Hunter of that Chamois Goat; but avail myself of the Chace in order to [pursue] a nobler purpose-that of making a road across the
Mountain in which Common Sense may hereafter pass backward
and forward, without desperate Leaps or Balloons that soar indeed but do not improve the chance of getting onward. [IS § 114]
T h e n o t e b o o k s a n d t h e m a r g i n a l i a i n p a r t i c u l a r , as w e a r e 5 Elisabeth Schneider Coleridge, Opium and Kubla Khan (1953) 288 67
b e g i n n i n g t o k n o w t h e m b e t t e r , a r e m a k i n g us i n c r e a s i n g l y a c q u a i n t e d w i t h this n e t t l e - n o s i n g spirit i n C o l e r i d g e , a n d m o r e f u l l y a w a r e o f its i m p l i c a t i o n s . I n t h e p r o s e as i n t h e p o e m s - w h a t e v e r t h e h a r e a n d h o w ever t h i c k the n e t t l e s - w h a t
w e see is a sense o f t h e
same
d e t e r m i n a t i o n t o q u e s t i o n t h e facts o f t h e r e l a t e d n e s s o f i n n e r a n d o u t e r w o r l d s . T h i s r e l a t e d n e s s is t h e r e , w h e t h e r o n e sees h i m as b e i n g i n a s t a t e o f p e r p e t u a l o s c i l l a t i o n as E l i s a b e t h S c h n e i d e r d o e s , o r m u m b l i n g a b o u t sumbject o r ombject as C a r l y l e d i d , or e m p l o y i n g the p o l a r i t y p r i n c i p l e everywhere i n a ' t e n a c i o u s u n i t y ' as i n e v i t a b l e r e l a t i o n o f c r e a t o r
and
c r e a t u r e , as O w e n B a r f i e l d l e a r n e d l y a n d e l e g a n t l y d o e s , o r whether one accepts T o m M c F a r l a n d ' s analysis o f a confront a t i o n a n d i n t e r p e n e t r a t i o n o f t h e 'I A M ' a n d t h e ' i t i s . ' I t is m o r e o f t e n t h a n n o t s u g g e s t e d b y h i s a d m i r e r s , o f t e n the m o r e l e a r n e d a n d s y m p a t h e t i c , that C o l e r i d g e for a l l his b r i l l i a n c e l a c k e d s o m e sense o f o r g a n i z a t i o n i n p h i l o s o p h y , some a r c h i t e c t o n i c p o w e r , that he b u i l t n o consistent p h i l o s o p h i c a l s y s t e m , t h a t h e t h r o w s o u t w o n d e r f u l a p e r g u s b u t is u n a b l e o r u n w i l l i n g to pursue t h e m to t h e i r l o g i c a l l i m i t s , just as h e w a s u n a b l e t o c o m p l e t e Christabel. P e r h a p s t h e r e w e r e s o m e o f the s a m e causes
behind both. T h e philosophical
i n c o m p l e t e n e s s a n d i n c o n c l u s i v e n e s s o n p a p e r , h o w e v e r , is n o t a m i r r o r - v i e w o f his m i n d . T h e n o t e b o o k s a l o n e suggest t h e m u l t i t u d i n o u s n e s s o f h i s m e n t a l a n d e m o t i o n a l life ( ' M y thoughts c r o w d e a c h other to death') - a n d that the pressure a n d strenuousness o f that c o n c e n t r a t i o n a n d e x c i t e m e n t was too m u c h e v e n for a m a n o f n o o r d i n a r y m e n t a l strength. A n d Coleridge's resilience a n d p h y s i c a l energy were remarkable. Y e t p a r t l y the incompleteness o f poems a n d p h i l o s o p h y m a y lie i n the same frustration. T h i s is n o t t o b e g t h e q u e s t i o n o f w h e t h e r o r n o t C o l e r i d g e was a systematic philosopher. H e referred often e n o u g h to ' m y S y s t e m , ' most often i n o p p o s i t i o n to S c h e l l i n g ' s , a n d 68
other G e r m a n transcendentalists-Fichte or Steffens-but doubt
i f it c a n be s h o w n f r o m
fragmentary
drafts
that
I
a n y fusion o f the v a r i o u s
Coleridge
left
a
systematic
p h i l o s o p h y i n t h e c o m m o n l y a c c e p t e d sense. ( P o s s i b l y T h o m a s M c F a r l a n d w i l l d o so i n h i s e d i t i o n o f t h e u n p u b l i s h e d O p u s M a x i m u m . ) E v e n i n some o f his l o n g e r marches,
the
t r a i l is n o t a l w a y s p u r s u e d f a r e n o u g h , t h e l o g i c a l d e d u c t i o n s a n d i n d u c t i o n s are not specific e n o u g h , to m a k e his w h o l e i n t e n t i o n c l e a r . H e is n o t s t r i c t e n o u g h t o satisfy s o m e k i n d s o f p r o f e s s i o n a l p h i l o s o p h e r s , a n d s o m e t i m e s h e is c l e a r l y g r i n d i n g t h e o l o g i c a l axes. S o m e o f his a t t e m p t s to d r a w u p e l a b o rate systematic outlines neatly d i v i d e d into
compartments
l o o k like a t t e m p t s to c h a l l e n g e o t h e r writers r a t h e r t h a n a n a t u r a l i n i t i a t i v e o f his o w n . I h a v e not c o u n t e d the drafts o f philosophical schemata,
but the v e r y n u m b e r a n d v a r i e t y
m a y be sufficient i n d i c a t i o n o f C o l e r i d g e ' s difficulty. O r d o they
i n d i c a t e a n unconscious d i s i n c l i n a t i o n to p r o d u c e
a
single c o m p l e t e p h i l o s o p h i c a l system? Possibly w o r k i n g constantly i n the notebooks gives one a m o r e v i v i d i m p r e s s i o n o f the s t r u g g l i n g process t h a n o f the u l t i m a t e w h o l e . Y e t there was that d e s c r i p t i o n o f the a i m i n t h e Lyrical Ballads,
to depict 'the p r i m a r y laws o f o u r nature,'
a n d , as h e s a i d i n t h e P r o s p e c t u s t o t h e Philosophical
Lectures, t o
see t h e s e l a w s i n r e l a t i o n t o ' t h e o r i g i n a n d p r i m a r y l a w s o f t h e W o r l d . ' Coleridge's thought was not really fragmentary.
It
w a s o r g a n i c , n o t a m e c h a n i c a l c o n s t r u c t i o n . T h a t is p a r t o f t h e d i f f i c u l t y , h i s a n d o u r s . P e r h a p s h i s best i n f l u e n c e l a y i n t r y i n g t o p e r s u a d e us t h a t k n o w l e d g e m u s t b e g r a s p e d w i t h a c o m p r e h e n s i v e awareness o f the interrelatedness o f w h a t he c a l l e d t h e 'multeity
o f e x t e r n a l a n d i n t e r n a l elements. A n d the
impossibility o f assigning h i m to a n y one school - G e r m a n transcendentalist, British idealist, F r e n c h existentialist or a n y o t h e r - is a n o t h e r i n d i c a t i o n o f w h e r e h i s c o n t r i b u t i o n lies. H e h a s d e b t s t o o r a f f i n i t i e s w i t h a l l o f these, a n d w i t h 69
other
t h i n k e r s as d i f f e r e n t as H e r a c l i t u s , P l o t i n u s , D u n s S c o t u s , V i c o , a n d S c h i l l e r a n d K a n t as w e l l as a l l t h o s e p o s t - K a n t i a n t r a n s c e n d e n t a l i s t s h e r e a d so a s s i d u o u s l y . ( M y c o u n t is a b o u t fifty
volumes of t h e m - h e probably read them more widely
t h a n a n y o n e o f his t i m e i n E n g l a n d . ) H e r e a d t h e m critically, c h i e f l y to m a k e use o f t h e i r vast c o m p e n d i a o f n a t u r a l a n d p h i l o s o p h i c a l history, but he was the i n c o r r i g i b l e questioner of their
fixed
positions, d i s c r i m i n a t i n g l y syncretic,
rather
than eclectic. S i r I s a i a h B e r l i n has said: ' T h e i m p o r t a n c e o f p h i l o s o p h e r s i n t h e e n d r e s i d e s i n t h e f a c t t h a t t h e issues w h i c h t h e y r a i s e d a r e l i v e issues s t i l l ( o r a g a i n ) , a n d . . . h a v e n o t p e r i s h e d w i t h the v a n i s h e d societies i n w h i c h t h e y w e r e c o n c e i v e d . ' H e w a s 6
w r i t i n g a b o u t V i c o , w h o m C o l e r i d g e greeted w h e n he w a s g i v e n a c o p y o f t h e New
Science i n 1 8 2 5 ( h e r e a d i t i n t h e
I t a l i a n ) as a k i n d r e d s p i r i t , b e c a u s e V i c o a l s o h a d b e e n t r y i n g to u n d e r s t a n d the p r i m a r y l a w s o f h u m a n n a t u r e , l o o k i n g at m y t h s a n d s y m b o l s o f e a r l i e r a g e s as t h e p r o d u c t s o f s o c i a l changes a n d revaluations. C o l e r i d g e too was l o o k i n g for a p h i l o s o p h y o f m a n . H i s difficulty was that he c o u l d leave n o t h i n g out o f his i n q u i r i e s . T h e v a l i d i t y o f m a n y o f those i n q u i r i e s persists t o d a y , h o w e v e r , for i f t h e y h a v e o n e c e n t r a l fire it is t h e c o n v i c t i o n t h a t p h i l o s o p h y a n d r e l i g i o n a r i s e o u t o f h u m a n n e e d , t h a t t h a t n e e d is n o t e n t i r e l y r a t i o n a l n o r t o b e satisfied c o m p l e t e l y b y reason, a n d that therefore e x p l o r a t i o n of the c o m p l e x i t i e s o f the i n n e r w o r l d of the h u m a n consciousness, o f t h e s o c i a l w o r l d o f m a n , a n d o f t h e p h y s i c a l w o r l d o f science, must a l l e v e n t u a l l y be v i e w e d together. Investigation for
h i m must originate w i t h the i n w a r d ,
7
and then
move
outwards. I n 1809 he w r o t e i n N o t e b o o k 25: 6 Vico and Herder (1975) xvi
7 As in his plan for Wordsworth's Philosophical Poem: Table Talk 21 July 1832
70
If it were asked of me to justify the interest... the majority of the best
and noblest minds feel in the great questions-Where am I? What
and for what am I? What are the duties, which arise out of the relations of my Being to itself as heir of futurity, and to the World
which is its present sphere of action and impression? - 1 would com
pare the human Soul to a Ship's Grew cast on an unknown Island (a
fair Simile: for these questions could not suggest themselves unless the mind had previously felt convictions, that the present World was
not its whole destiny and abiding Country) - what would be their first business? Surely, to enquire what ships visited that Island? when? and whither they
went? - and what chance that they should take off first one, & then another?-and after this-to think, how they should maintain &
employ themselves during their stay - & how best stock themselves
for the expected voyage, & procure the means of inducing the
Captain to take them to the Harbour, which they wished to go to? The
moment,
when
the
Soul
begins
to
be
sufficiently
self-conscious, to ask concerning itself, & its relations, is the first
moment of its intellectual arrival into the World -Its Being- enigmatic as it must seem - is posterior to its Existence. - Suppose the ship
wrecked man stunned, & for many weeks in a state of Ideotcy or utter
loss of Thought & Memory - & then gradually awakened. [CJV III
3593]
' H o p e a n d F e a r suppose a n u n k n o w n yet real certainty' he s a i d - ' t h e fixed a n d n e c e s s a r y R e l a t i o n o f O b j e c t t o S u b j e c t ' (GAT III 3 5 9 2 ) . B u t w h a t t h a t ' R e l a t i o n ' w a s r e m a i n e d h i s question. A l l k n o w i n g w a s for h i m a creative o r d e r i n g o f chaos, a n d therefore, he said, 'the Necessary a n d I m m u t a b l e is t h e c e n t r a l p o i n t t o w h i c h a l l h u m a n k n o w l e g e g r a v i t a t e s ' ( i b i d ) . Y e t as ' a r e p e t i t i o n i n t h e finite m i n d o f t h e I n f i n i t e I A M , ' w h a t e v e r is h u m a n l y c r e a t e d is a s t r u g g l i n g r e p e t i t i o n , at a distance, e n d u r i n g the l i m i t a t i o n s a n d the c o m p a r a t i v e relativity
that
are
the
conditions 71
of human
frailty.
So
a l t h o u g h as a C a m b r i d g e p h i l o s o p h e r , D o r o t h y E m m e t , says, ' . . . f e w p r o f e s s i o n a l p h i l o s o p h e r s h a v e s e e n as f a r as C o l e r i d g e into the powers o f the h u m a n m i n d , '
8
or perhaps because o f
that, C o l e r i d g e o n his o w n hypothesis w o u l d h a v e f o u n d it difficult to be the architect o f a c o m p l e t e system. ... H e believed in growth, the 'free life', with a deep antipathy to 'the
confining form'; he had what he called a 'rooted aversion to the
Arbitrary;
systems and system-making do tend to become at some
point arbitrary. H e preferred 'method' to system, and it will be protested by some that he did not achieve method either. But that
depends on what you mean by it. H e said somewhere that the
shortest path gives one the knowledge best, but the longer way round
makes one more knowing. T h e fragments he left us in such quantities
certainly necessitate the longer way round. They tantalize us into
wishing to understand him, and then, willy-nilly, into facing the questions he raised.
9
I h a v e b e e n q u o t i n g myself. A n d n o w I s h o u l d like to share m o r e directly, albeit i n their o w n miscellaneousness, the chaos of the notebooks. O n the subject o f his insistence o n , even obsession w i t h the necessity o f establishing the relations o f things, a n d the difficulties c r e a t e d thereby, he m a d e this p r i v a t e admission: Doubtless it would visit the Realm of Literature with a plusquam
polar Ink-frost, if a man were bound to write on nothing till he
understood everything! Nevertheless, so far I hold it a possible and
expedient approximation that, no other person having done it for me, I strive to begin at the Beginning. But independent of the probable unsatisfactory nature of the results, I am yearly more and ? ?????????? ??? ??????????? ?? ?? ? ????????? ?? ???? ????? ???????? ??? T h e i r Background Series 1971) 196
9 The Self-Conscious Imagination (1974) 76-7 72
more sensible of the difficulty of writing on detached Subjects (Philo
sophical subjects I mean, whether physio- theo- or anthropo-logical) and whenever from whatever motive I make the attempt, the impor tance of this, that, and yet another and another Principle, or Posi
tion, which had I proceeded to the Subject as part of the System, I
should have enunciated a half or a whole Volume before, and from frequent previous applications of the Principle have needed only a
few words and a (Vide § - p . -) the sense, I say, of the necessity of some higher formula is sure to return and harrass me with its Solicit-
ings, like a night-traveller who every two or three minutes makes a
stop and then walks on with his head over his shoulder, because he
hears, or fancies that he hears someone behind, panting and calling
out his name, some auditual Jack a' Lanthorn, or Vox Fatua. [IS § 167]
I w o u l d p o i n t o u t t h a t m o s t o f a l l t h a t is o n e s e n t e n c e , so t h e d i f f i c u l t y is n o t o n l y d e t a c h i n g s u b j e c t s b u t d e t a c h i n g s e n tences. H e often m a d e f u n o f h i m s e l f for his weakness for parentheses. O n e a s p e c t o f these c l o s e l y k n i t p a s s a g e s is t h e swiftness o f his o w n association o f ideas, w h i c h s o m e t i m e s b r i n g s together marvellous incongruities. F o r instance, i n N o t e b o o k 22 w e f i n d this: 31 M a r c h 1817. H i g h g a t e . - M o n d a y Morning, six o'clock. Hen Pen
[Henry Gillman, 2 or 3 years old] resenting the being washed, in the nursery, opposite the drawing R o o m in which I sit.
I will not say, that in our present religious controversies we are
disputing about trifles...
[CJV III 4341]
O n e m i g h t t h i n k that the association (if any) was i n the w o r d trifles, w h i c h is i t a l i c i z e d , l i t t l e H e n r y G i l l m a n ' s o b j e c t i o n s t o the t r i f l i n g business o f b e i n g w a s h e d . B u t t h e e n t r y goes o n about O r i g i n a l S i n a n d man's alienation from G o d 73
We must be away from H i m / for an omnipotent Father would never suffer an innocent Son to be tormented in his presence...
N o w C o l e r i d g e h a d a fatherly affection for H e n r y G i l l m a n a n d a special understanding o f h i m , a p r o b l e m child, a n d I s u g g e s t (it is p e r h a p s b l a s p h e m o u s ) - t h a t C o l e r i d g e c o u l d n o t b e a r h e a r i n g his screams o v e r h a v i n g a d i r t y face w a s h e d ,
and
that this s o m e h o w l i n k e d u p easily w i t h G o d ' s suffering over t h e o r i g i n a l filth o f m a n . E v e r y t h i n g is r e l a t e d t o e v e r y t h i n g else. T h e e n t r y c o n t i n u e s w i t h t h e P r o d i g a l S o n , H e a v e n n o t a place, U n i t a r i a n i s m a n d M a t e r i a l i s m . C o l e r i d g e h a d a taste for the i n c o n g r u o u s a n a l o g y , especially against p o m p o u s politicians; particularly he much
of w h a t passed i n p a r l i a m e n t
for logic.
despised
(Historians
w o u l d do w e l l to look i n o n C o l e r i d g e occasionally; might
find
some amusing m e m o r a n d a o n public
they
affairs.)
Thursday 15 M a y 1823-Debate in the House of Commons on M r .
Fowell Buxton's Motion for the Emancipation of Negro Slaves,
whose speech, a something between a College Declamation, and the opening Harangue of the Counsel for a Prosecution at the
old
Bailey,... was answered by M r . Canning with his wonted ability and
adroitness, and likewise with his wonted Sophistry and dexterous
Quid-pro-quo-ism. [Notebook 29]
C o l e r i d g e c o p i e d out a l o n g piece o f the debate: ... M r . C . confessed that he always had a decided objection to the introduction of the Name of Christianity in the debates of the House. (In this I perfectly agree with Mr.
C.)
A f t e r m o r e a b o u t C h r i s t i a n i t y a n d the slave t r a d e C a n n i n g said: 74
It is true there is no permission in the Chr. Doctrine for the infliction
of Slavery, but it was not true that there was any direct prohibition of it.
Coleridge
inserted
a
parenthesis
i n his notes,
suddenly
r e m e m b e r i n g similar logic i n a schoolfellow w h o defended a friend caught s m o k i n g a cigar: [Mem.
Winch's Defence of [Blank] and leaving the Sin offering infullfume on
Bowyer's Desk. 'You know, Sir! You never forewarned it'. S.T.C.)
T h e b a d l o g i c o f the p u b l i c m e n o f his t i m e w a s f r e q u e n t l y the subject o f C o l e r i d g e ' s a n g e r a n d laughter. A q u i t e different tone r u n n i n g t h r o u g h a l l the notebooks may
surprise those w h o k n o w o n l y the m o r e f o r m a l works:
n a m e l y that tentativeness I h a v e a l r e a d y m e n t i o n e d . T h e v e r y titles he g a v e s o m e o f his n o t e b o o k s suggest the m o o d : ' F l y - c a t c h e r o r D a y - B o o k for i m p o u n d i n g stray ( N o t e b o o k 4 5 ) o r ' Volatilia, Thoughts-impounding
thoughts'
o r D a y - b o o k for b i r d - l i m i n g s m a l l
Stray Thoughts
and
holding
for
T r i a l d o u b t f u l T h o u g h t s . ' I n a late entry, for e x a m p l e , C o l e r i d g e s a i d (1829): Should these pages in their present state in consequence of death or disablement preventing me from arriving at a fuller & clear insight,
meet the eye of an intelligent Reader, let him know that he cannot be
more sensible than I myself am, of the turbidness and obscurity of the
preceding imperfect exposition of the thought... etc. etc. [Notebook
39]
T h e s e r i o u s s i d e o f t h i s c a n b e v e r y d i s a r m i n g . H e is w i l l i n g to c h a n g e his m i n d e v e n a b o u t things o f m a j o r i m p o r t a n c e to h i m . P a r l i a m e n t a r y R e f o r m , for instance.
75
Y o u cannot conceive how this Corn Bill haunts me - and so it would
you if you had seen the pale faces and heard the conversation of the
hundred poor Creatures [he was writing in 1815 from Somerset] who
came to sign the Petition. Except Horner every one of the opponents
of the measure has betrayed the Cause ... T h e North is in a flame - the result will be a league between the Ministry and the L a n d -
Nabobs not to disband the Soldiery. [He clearly, like some others,
feared civil war.] I have hitherto in the Friend in the M . Post and the
Courier, and in conversation, opposed the so called Parliament Reformers-I have not altered my principles-yet now I must join in pleading for Reform. - I assumed as the Ideal of a Legislature - that in which all the great component interests of the State are ade
quately represented, so that no one should have the power of
oppressing the others, the whole being in sympathy of action &
re-action with the feelings and convictions of the People -1 now see
that this is not the case - & I see the historical cause too. - Neither
Blackstone or De Lolme have truly given the Theory of our Constitu
tion-which would have been realized in practice but for two
oversights. - But of this hereafter - . I have no opportunity of seeing any of the Shoal of Pamphlets on this Question; but I suppose, that
the Speeches in Parliament contain the Essence - if so, G o d have mercy on the Intellects of the Nation! How indeed can it be other
wise, with such Educations as our Gentlemen receive! [CLIV 553-4] T h e r e is a c e r t a i n r e a s o n a b l e n e s s a b o u t C o l e r i d g e , a n a b i l i t y t o r e c o n s i d e r ; h e is t h e t r u e i n q u i r e r . B o r n i n t o t h e C h u r c h o f E n g l a n d , i n t h e 1 7 9 0 s a U n i t a r i a n , a n d f o r t h e r e s t o f h i s life h i g h l y c r i t i c a l o f t h e C h u r c h o f E n g l a n d as a n i n s t i t u t i o n , C o l e r i d g e nevertheless r e t u r n e d to it again, a n d for the
first
t i m e since his C a m b r i d g e days, took the S a c r a m e n t i n 1827. Yet
the
Having
question renounced
o f necessitarianism it himself he still,
a notebook:
76
gave
h i m trouble.
i n 1810, wrote i n
I dare avow - & hope, I shall give no offence to serious Believers - that
it appears to me scarcely possible, that a young man of ingenuous
dispositions, warm sensibility, and an enquiring mind should avoid Socinianism. [CN III 3743]
B y w h i c h he means necessitarian U n i t a r i a n i s m . H e works out a t s o m e l e n g t h five r e a s o n s , t h e m o s t i n t e r e s t i n g o f w h i c h w a s t h a t t h e y o u n g f e e l n o n e e d o f t h e d o c t r i n e o f free w i l l we least value & think of that which we enjoy in the highest degree
- this free-agency, the unsettled state of Habit not yet Tyranny - we begin to think of & intellectually know, our freedom, when we have been made to feel its imperfections and its loss. [CN HI 3743]
I n a n o t h e r e n t r y a l i t t l e l a t e r h e s p e c i f i c a l l y relates this last p o i n t t o h i m s e l f as a y o u n g m a n . What was my own case has so often come within my observation in
others that I am almost disposed to generalize it into a rule - that the more
vigorous the Volition, (as in sanguine lively young men of quick abilities)
the less the indisposition to the denial of the Free will and the doctrine of
Necessity or absolute preformation of every possible act in the one causa causarum - Nay, that from the same law of mind at the aera in which we
are most rich in any thing, that thing we least stickle for. T h e young think more highly of chastity than the M a n of50-60. - [Notebook 27]
I n 1 7 9 5 i n a B r i s t o l l e c t u r e , r e p r i n t e d i n The Friend, h e h a d cogently a d v o c a t e d necessitarianism; then, over twenty years l a t e r , i n a t least t h r e e c o p i e s o f The Friend h e w r o t e a m a r g i n a l note: I hope, that this paragraph in all the fullness of its Contrast with my present Convictions, will start up before me whenever I speak, think,
77
or feel intolerantly of Persons on account of their doctrines and opin
ions.' 'S.T. Coleridge. Highgate, 30 O c f 1818' [Friend (CC) I 338] T h e r e was a related entry six years later. I n 1824, his s o n D e r w e n t s h o w e d signs o f f r e e - t h i n k i n g ,
a p p a r e n t l y , b u t it was c o m b i n e d w i t h a c e r t a i n flashiness a n d w o r l d l i n e s s t h a t b o t h e r e d his father. M e m . of the aera of Phil. Necess. with me my true Lehrjahre. T h e
World, man included, not the object; but G o d i.e. Good, T r u t h ,
Beauty + a Power limited only by its identity with G . T . and
B. - Such was the beautiful half-truth that deceived & saved me. But
D . & his Perverters! - O ! -
[Notebook 29]
D e r w e n t eventually became ultra-respectable a n d
High
C h u r c h i n spite o f the fact t h a t o n e o f his ' P e r v e r t e r s ' w a s Thomas Babington Macaulay. P a r t o f t h e p l e a s u r e o f t h e n o t e b o o k s is s u c h g l i m p s e s o f C o l e r i d g e ' s c a n d o u r , c h a n g i n g h i s m i n d a b o u t Necessity a n d t r y i n g to u n d e r s t a n d a n d to e x p l a i n h i m s e l f to h i m s e l f a n d the y o u n g m e n a r o u n d h i m to themselves: e v e n the sign, i n the 1824 e n t r y a b o u t D e r w e n t , o f t h e o l d m a n ' s a f f e c t i o n f o r h i s o w n past, t h o u g h self-indulgent, has s o m e t h i n g h u m a n a b o u t it. B e s i d e s , t h e c o n t r a s t w i t h D e r w e n t w a s a t r u e o n e : C o l e ridge's r a d i c a l y o u t h was n e v e r self-seeking, n e v e r a n y t h i n g but idealistic, a n d there was concern i n m o r e than one quarter a b o u t D e r w e n t ' s l a c k o f seriousness i n his twenties. S o m e t h i n g o n e n e v e r t i r e s o f is t h e u n e x p e c t e d o b s e r v a tions, often i n n o p a r t i c u l a r context, just the o r i g i n a l thoughts o f a n observant m a n . E x a m p l e s are legion, o f w h i c h I take b u t a small sample: W h e n balloons, or these new roads, upon which they say it will be possible to travel fifteen miles an hour, for a day together, shall 78
become the common mode of travelling, women will become more locomotive; - the health of all classes will be materially benefitted.
Women will then spend less time in attiring themselves - will invent some more simple head gear, or dispense with it altogether.
Or
10
again,
I feel that there is a mystery in the sudden by-act-of-will-unaided,
nay, more than that, frustrated, recollection of a Name. I was trying
to recollect the name of a Bristol Friend, who had attended me in my
Illness at M Wade's. I began with the Letters of the Alphabet - A B r
C & c. - and I know not why, felt convinced that it began with H .
I ran thro' all the vowels, aeiouy, and with all the consonants to e a c h - H a b , Heb, H i b , H o b , H u b and so o n - i n vain. I then began
other Letters-all in vain. Three minutes afterwards, having com pletely given it up, the name, Daniel, at once started up, perfectly
insulated, without any the dimmest antecedent connection, as far as
my consciousness extended. There is no explanation, , of this fact, but by a full sharp distinction of Mind from Consciousness-the Consciousness being the narrow Neck of the Bot
tle. T h e name, Daniel, must have been a living Atom-thought in my
mind, whose uneasy motions were the craving to recollect it - but the
very craving led the mind to a search which at each successive
disappointment (= a tiny pain) tended to contract the orifice or outlet into Consciousness. Well - it is given up - & all is quiet - the Nerves
are asleep, or off their guard - & then the Name pops up, makes its way, & there it is! - not assisted by any association, but the very
contrary-by the suspension and sedation of all associations. [IS § 3] W h a t some persons enjoy most i n Coleridge's prose, i n the n o t e b o o k s a n d letters p a r t i c u l a r l y , also i n the m a r g i n a l i a , are his p i t h y a p h o r i s m s , often i n i n q u i r y f o r m . F o r e x a m p l e , 10 Thomas Allsop Letters, Conversations and Recollections of S.T. Coleridge (1836) II 154
79
Is it or is it not true, that whoever supermoralizes unmoralizes? [CN
II 2358]
[Agreeing with Leibniz that] Men's errors (intellectual) chiefly in denying. [CN II 2596]
consist
[A favourite image] - It is not enough that we have once swallowed it - the Heart should have fed upon the truth, as insects on a Leaf, till it
be tinged with the colour, and shew its food in every minutest fibre. [CL I 115]
[On the rejection of new ideas] - Incredulity is but credulity seen
from behind, bowing and nodding assent to the Habitual & Fashion able. [SM (CC) Appendix C 81]
Minds that feel and struggle up against the weight and witchery of
Custom. [Notebook 29]
A Tyrant is only a Monstrous Phantasm up-steaming from the Grave and Corruption of the huddled Corses of the self-murdered Virtue &
inner freedom of the People-i.e. the Majority of the Citizens of the
State. [Notebook 29]
T h e defect of Archbishop Leighton's reasoning is taking Eternity for a kind of time. [Notebook 211/2] W e can scarcely think too highly of the potential in us, or too humbly of the Actual. [Marginal note on Schlegel, Athenaeum I i.77] Naturally
some o f the most interesting entries are a b o u t
himself. H e h a d b e e n w r i t i n g a b o u t the n e e d for h u m i l i t y , b u t , h e says preserve me from the deadly Hensbane of Self-contempt, the worst
< a n d > most concentrated form of Selfishness! F o r it is a shrinking 80
down into the mere Self, an abstraction from the redeeming G o d . It
is well to know & feel what we should be without G o d . But to
contemplate our Self as actually existing without G o d , is frightful morally, & a contradiction philosophically... [Notebook 44]
or again what Method should a Philosopher and Thinker adopt to form or to cultivate-Habits of Religious Feeling? [Notebook 26]
A b o u t the o p i u m - t a k i n g he expresses h i m s e l f r a t h e r c o n v e n t i o n a l l y p e r h a p s , b u t h e sees t h a t a l t h o u g h o p i u m w a s o n e o f the s t u m b l i n g blocks to self-knowledge, a n d creative activity g e n e r a l l y , y e t he asks himself, has it b e e n also o n e o f t h e pressures t o w a r d s self-examination,
a d o o r t o w a r d s secret
p a s s a g e s - t o c u r i o u s states o f i n s i g h t i n t o o t h e r h u m a n b e i n g s ? Need we wonder at Plato's opinions concerning the Body, at least,
need that man wonder whom a pernicious Drug shall make capable of
conceiving & bringing forth Thoughts, hidden in him before, which shall call for the deepest feelings of his best, greatest, & sanest
Contemporaries? and this proved to him by actual experience? But
can subtle strings set in greater tension do this? O r is it not that the dire poison for a delusive time has made the body, i.e. the organiza
tion ... the unknown somewhat, a fitter Instrument for the allpowerful Soul? [CAT HI 3320]
T h e a m o u n t o f sheer p a i n i n the notebooks has been startling to m a n y readers. (It s h o o k for s o m e d a y s t h e late H e l e n D a r b i s h i r e w h e n s h e r e a d t h e g a l l e y - p r o o f s o f v o l u m e II.) T h e r e , for instance, a l o n g entry a b o u t his hopeless love for S a r a H u t c h i n s o n ends, Awakened from a dream of Tears, & anguish of involuntary Jeal ousy, H past 2 / S e p t . 13. 1807,
81
and
i t is f o l l o w e d b y t h i s :
T o lie in ease yet dull anxiety for hours, afraid to think a thought, lest some thought of Anguish should shoot a pain athwart my body,
afraid even to turn my body, lest the very bodily motion should introduce a train of painful Thoughts- [CNII
Two
3149]
years earlier i n M a l t a he h a d written:
... W h o that thus lives with a continually divided Being can remain
healthy! < A n d who can long remain body-crazed, & not at times use
unworthy means of making his Body the fit instrument of his mind?
Pain is easily subdued compared with continual uncomfortableness
- and the sense of stifled Power! - O this is that which made poor
Henderson, Collins, Boyce, & c & c &c-Sots\ - awful T h o u g h t s - O it is horrid! - Die, my Soul, die! - Suicide-rather than this, the worst
State of Degradation! It is less a suicide! S . T . C > - I work hard, I do the duties of common Life from morn to night / but verily -1 raise my
limbs, 'like lifeless Tools' - T h e organs of motion & outward action
perform their functions at the stimulus of a galvanic fluid applied by
the Will, not by the Spirit of Life that makes Soul and Body one. [ C Y
II 2557]
B u t as I s a i d e a r l i e r , t h e r e s i l i e n c e a n d t h e s a n i t y , so m u c h c a l l e d for, w e r e r e m a r k a b l e . H e says t h a t his i n f i r m i t i e s h a v e b e e n useful to h i m , p e r h a p s m o r e useful t h a n W o r d s w o r t h ' s Mrc/zfirmities,' i n m a k i n g h i m a w a r e o f the feelings o f others, b u t h i s o w n w o r d s so s h o c k e d h i m t h a t h e e n t i t l e d t h e e n t r y ' A G n o s t i c W h i s p e r ' a n d wrote the most frightening w o r d s i n Greek characters. I have translated a n d / o r transliterated t h e m i n square brackets:
N.B. That as far as Philosophy (= the Sum Total, of the Being) is
concerned, //zfirmities sunk under, the Conscious Soul mourning and disapproving,
are
less hindrances than A w/zfirmities - such
as
Self-ness ... and separative instead of being, what it ought to be, at once distinctive and yet, at the same moment or rather act, conjunctive,
unificentl
I will not
refer to AixJTpaXic, [Australis-
Southey]; but to a truly great GENIUS, 'A^ioAoyoc, [Axiologos -
Wordsworth] - Were intellect only in question, axe, [STS for STG]
would rather groan under his manifold sins & sorrows, all either contained in or symbolized by, QI1M [OPIUM] than cherish that
self-concentration [of Ax.] which renders the dearest
beings means to him, never really ends. N.B. Its curious & often
ludicrous effects on the memory: At, [Ax.] has more than once or twice
gravely preached to Gxq [STG], as a new discovery, what axe, [STC] had been years before attempting but in vain to persuade AJ; [Ax.]
of, not only in conversation but by long Letters-but who can rearticulate the pulses of the Air? A n d as to the Letters, they not being those of A£, r|a5eX