Dynamics and bifurcations [Corrected] 0387971416, 9780387971414

This comprehensive textbook is designed to take undergraduate and beginning graduate students of mathematics, science, a

126 29 39MB

English Pages 291 [581] Year 1991

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

Table of contents :
Cover
Title page
Greeting
Contents
PART I: Dimension One
Chapter 1. Scalar Autonomous Equations
1.1. Existence and Uniqueness
1.2. Geometry of Flows
1.3. Stability of Equilibria
1.4. Equations on a Circle
Chapter 2. Elementary Bifurcations
2.1. Dependence on Parameters - Examples
2.2. The Implicit Function Theorem
2.3. Local Perturbations Near Equilibria
2.4. An Example on a Circle
2.5. Computing Bifurcation Diagrams
2.6. Equivalence of Flows
Chapter 3. Scalar Maps
3.1. Euler's Algorithm and Maps
3.2. Geometry of Scalar Maps
3.3. Bifurcations of Monotone Maps
3.4. Period-doubling Bifurcation
3.5. An Example: The Logistic Map
PART II: Dimension One and One Half
Chapter 4. Scalar Nonautonomous Equations
4.1. General Properties of Solutions
4.2. Geometry of Periodic Equations
4.3. Periodic Equations on a Cylinder
4.4. Examples of Periodic Equations
4.5. Stability of Periodic Solutions
Chapter 5. Bifurcation of Periodic Equations
5.1. Bifurcations of Poincar\303\251 Maps
5.2. Stability of Nonhyperbolic Periodic Solutions
5.3. Perturbations of Vector Fields
Chapter 6. On Tori and Circles
6.1. Differential Equations on a Torus
6.2. Rotation Number
6.3. An Example: The Standard Circle Map
PART III: Dimension Two
Chapter 7. Planar Autonomous Systems
7.1. \"Natural\" Examples of Planar Systems
7.2. General Properties and Geometry
7.3. Product Systems
7.4. First Integrals and Conservatjve Systems
7.5. Examples of Elementary Bifurcations
Chapter 8. Linear Systems
8.1. Properties of Solutions of Linear Systems
8.2. Reduction to Canonical Forms
8.3. Qualitative Equivalence in Linear Systems
8.4. Bifurcations in Linear Systems
8.5. Nonhomogeneous Linear Systems
8.6. Linear Systems with 1-periodic Coefficients
Chapter 9. Near Equilibria
9.1. Asymptotic Stability from Linearization
9.2. Instability from Linearization
9.3. Liapunov Functions
9.4. An Invariance Principle
9.5. Preservation of a Saddle
9.6. Flow Equivalence Near Hyperbolic Equilibria
9.7. Saddle Connections
Chapter 10. In the Presence of a Zero Eigenvalue
10.1. Stability
10.2. Bifurcations
10.3. Center Manifolds
Chapter 11. In the Presence of Purely Imaginary Eigenvalues
11.1. Stability
11.2. Poincar\303\251-Andronov-Hopf Bifurcation
11.3. Computing Bifurcation Curves
Chapter 12. Periodic Orbits
12.1. Poincar\303\251-Bendixson Theorem
12.2. Stability of Periodic Orbits
12.3. Local Bifurcations of Periodic Orbits
12.4. A Homoclinic Bifurcation
Chapter 13. All Planar Things Considered
13.1. Structurally Stable Vector Fields
13.2. Dissipative Systems
13.3. One-parameter Generic Bifurcations
13.4. Bifurcations in the Presence of Symmetry
13.5. Local Two-parameter Bifurcations
Chapter 14. Conservative and Gradient Systems
14.1. Second-order Conservative Systems
14.2. Bifurcations in Conservative Systems
14.3. Gradient Vector Fields
Chapter 15. Planar Maps
15.1. Linear Maps
15.2. Near Fixed Points
15.3. Numerical Algorithms and Maps
15.4. Saddle Node and Period Doubling
15.5. Poincar\303\251-Andronov-Hopf Bifurcation
15.6. Area-preserving Maps
PART IV: Higher Dimensions
Chapter 16. Dimension Two and One Half
16.1. Forced Van der Pol
16.2. Forced Duffing
16.3. Near a Transversal Homoclinic Point
16.4. Forced and Damped Duffing
Chapter 17. Dimension Three
17.1. Period Doubling
17.2. Bifurcation to Invariant Torus
17.3. Silnikov Orbits
17.4. The Lorenz Equations
Chapter 18. Dimension Four
18.1. Integrable Hamiltonians
18.2. A Nonintegrable Hamiltonian
FAREWELL
APPENDIX: A Catalogue of Fundamental Theorems
REFERENCES
INDEX
Recommend Papers

Dynamics and bifurcations [Corrected]
 0387971416, 9780387971414

  • 0 0 0
  • Like this paper and download? You can publish your own PDF file online for free in a few minutes! Sign Up
File loading please wait...
Citation preview

K. Hale

Jack

Bifurcations)

314

Ko\nak)

and

Dynamics

With

Htiseyin

Illustrations)

Springer)))

H iiseyin

K. Hale

Jack

School of

Mathematics

Institute

Georgia

Ko\037ak

of Mathematics

Department

of Technology

Atlanta, GA 30332 USA

of Miami

University

Coral

and

Science

Computer

FL

Gables,

33124

USA

[email protected])

[email protected]) Editors

L.

Marsden

IE.

Control and Dynamical Systems, Institute of Technology California

Brown

CA 91125

Pasadena,

Sirovich

of Applied

Division

104-44

Mathematics

University

RI 02912

Providence,

USA

USA

M. Golubitsky

W.

of Mathematics

Department

University of Houston Houston, TX 77004

Universitat

USA)

and text art

Cover

Mathematics

Subject

Halil

by

Jager

of Congress

Catalog

Printed

on acid-free

paper.)

Heidelberg

1m Neuenheimer

Feld 294

6900

FRG)

Heidelberg,

Buttann.)

58 Fxx, 34 xx, 58 F

Classifications:

Library

of Applied Mathematics

Department

Card

Number:

14)

92-10512)

New York, Inc. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, written (Springer-Verlag, permission of the publisher Use in reviews or scholarly analysis. for brief excerpts in connection with USA), except electronic comconnection with any form of information storage and retrieval, adaptation, is now known or hereafter or by similar or dissimilar developed software, methodology puter forbidden. even The use of general etc., in this publication, names, trade names, trademarks, descriptive as a sign that such names, as is not to be taken if the former are not especially identified, Marks and Merchandise understood Act, may accordingly be used freely by by the Trade

@ 1991

All

rights

Springer-Verlag reserved.

anyone.) from the authors' TEX file. Photocomposed copy prepared & Sons, Harrisonburg, Printed and bound by R.R. Donnelley in the United States of America.) Printed

9 87 6 5 4 3

(Corrected

third

printing,

Virginia.

1996))

ISBN

0-387-97141-6

Springer-Verlag

New

ISBN

3-540-97141-6

Springer- Verlag

Berlin

York

Berlin

Heidelberg

Heidelberg New York

SPIN

10549030)))

To Who

are the for

Students:)

primary the ou

reason

of

existence r profession

and

this

book)))

Greeting)

Thank

you

and

it is

As

us

the

about

an unusual

explain

it

how

in

book

evolved

will

find ideas

and both

difference

content

at

Brown

bifur-

equations.

and style, let

courses

in

the

Dividuring

University

being.

and

alias equations, dynamical in science, one which chapter germias celestial fields such mechanics, nonlinear oscillations, Over the centuries, as a result of the efforts of sciendynamics. mathematicians alike, an attractive and far-reaching theory has

systems, is an old in applied nated

and fluid tists and

into

you

of dynamics and

from our

sion of Applied Mathematics a three-year period, and came The subject of differential

Inside

geometry

differential

of ordinary

cations

our book.

for opening

examples

and

difference

much-honored

of computers, years, due primarily to the proliferation has once more in turned to its roots with dynamical systems applications a more mature outlook. Currently, the level of excitement and perhaps front but in almost all allied fields activity, not only on the mathematical It is the aim of our book to provide a modest founof learning, is unique. of these dation for taking facets part in certain theoretical and practical exciting developments. of dynamical The subject accessible to systems is a vast one not easily and beginning graduate students in mathematics or science undergraduate and engineering. Many of the available books and expository narratives either extensive mathematical or are not designed to require preparation, be used as textbooks. It is with the desire to fill this void that we have In

emerged.

written

recent

the present

It is both damental ple

setting,

our

book. conviction

and

our

ideas of dynamics and bifurcations one that is mathematically

experience can insightful

that many be

explained

yet

devoid

of

the

fun-

in a simof

extensive)))

viii

Greeting)

we have opted in the present book to proceed Accordingly, by low-dimensional dynamical systems. We will momentarily give a brief of some of the central topics of our book, one which necessarily summary If you are a beginning student of dynamterms. contains some technical rest assured that precise mathematical definitions of all these ics, however, as as realizations the well of in specific terms, ample phenomena dynamical will unfold as turn the equations, you pages. in dimensions one, \"one and one half,\" and two constitute Equations the majority of the text. are devoted Indeed, nearly one hundred pages to scalar equations where, their and despite simplicity apparent triviality, ideas of our subject are already visible. We many of the contemporary in particular, that the basic notions of stability and bifurcademonstrate, tions of vector fields are easily explained for scalar autonomous equationsdimension one-because their are determined flows from the equilibrium formalism.

We

points.

to

scalar

exciting,

that may

doubling

bifurcation,

furcations

how

also explore and show

of periodic

chaos,

etc.

solutions of

approximation

We then

turn to

nonautonomous

equations

the

lead

and is poor-periodand bidynamics

albeit

\"anomalies,\"

numerical

when

arise

of such

solutions

numerical

some of the

maps,

equations

profound

with

periodic

coefficients-dimension one and one half-where scalar natmaps reappear In our discussion of the stability of periodic somaps. urally as Poincare lutions of such equations, we demonstrate how one naturally encounters ideas from the transformation elementary but essential theory of differential equations-normal form theory. These ideas, in the context presented of scalar equations, and more importantly, the philosophical outlook of the recur in later chapters, with a that these ideas convey, subject frequently few

technical

embellishments.

proceed to

autonomous new equations-dimension two--where, equilibria, dynamical such as periodic and homoclinic orbits, appears. In studying behavior, the stability of an equilibrium point, we touch certain subtle topoupon of linear systems as well as the standard aspects logical theory of Liapunov functions. The bifurcation of equilibriurn points of planar equations theory rise to a number of new ideas. for example, the bifurcation gives When, is to other one is led naturally to introduce center manifolds equilibria, and the method of Liapunov-Schmidt to make a reduction to a scalar autonomous equation. The other bifurcation from an equilibrium important is to a periodic orbit-Poincare-Andronov-Hopf bifurcation-and point its analysis can be reduced to that of a nonautonomous periodic equation. There are, of course, other properties of planar differential that equations are more global in character and hence be investigated in terms cannot of scalar chosen to equations. Among these interesting topics, we have include the Poincare-Bendixson theory of planar limit sets, geometry and of conservative bifurcations and gradient systems, and a discussion of struc-))) We next

the

investigate

in

dynamics addition to

of planar

ix)

Greeting

tural

of course, an

stability-with,

include an

We subsequently

of the

theory

ideas

the

on

emphasis

than on

rather

details.

technical

extensive

of

maps.

planar

of certain

discussion

abbreviated

As in

the case of with numerical

scalar

aspects we explore

equations,

difficulties associated solutions of differential in of the and of such bifurcations equations light dynamics maps. To indicate not the richness but also the of this topic, only bewildering complexity we include computer simulations of some of the famous maps. The final part of the book consists of several substantial in examples This section is more disdimensions \"two and one half,\" three, and four. cursive than the previous it is more like a preview to provide ones; designed a smooth entry into certain areas of current research-forced oscillations, of

some

the

strange attractors, of

invited to browse the entries, however, of mathematics, parts

most

tral of

list of the

course,

ruse

must

one

place,

while

general

face the task

especially

in applications.

most

abstractly inclined, grappling irreplaceable source of general in mind, the text and the philosophy

to

with

specific theoretical

be an

numerous

interest.

practical

systems, etc. book, you are,

of

the

analyzing

Moreover,

out

to

equations

the

for

of theoretical and

the dynamics of unraveling insurmountable. The analytically

be

dynanlics

even

examples usually proves observations. With this alike are interwoven with

Unfortunately,

often turns

tions

exercises

difference

and

differential

specific

the

Table of Contents. As you pethat in dynamical systems, as in theorems certainly occupy a cen-

ultimately

equations,

specific

the

in mind

in

covered

topics

through bear

Hamiltonian

integrable

completely

chaos,

detailed

more

a

For

equa-

specific

computer, in

its utility in this is, however, beginning to prove our favorite computer program is, of course, An Animator/Simulator PHASER: for Dynamical Systems, accompanyand Difference Equations through ing one of our earlier books Differential students Our have found PHASER to be an ideal Computer Experiments. in dynamical medium to see the \"dynamics\" and to do some of systems of the it to produce their assignments; we, too, used illustrations for many all

its

versatility,

present

pursuit. On

our

that

front,

book.

Dynamical f3

new

this

Bifurcations

systems

you will be inclined our other favorite

course,

We contributed

would

is

arouse

will

to

like

unselfishly

area. We hope that in interest bifurcation your theory to explore this exciting subject further and vibrant

a vast

book-Methods

record

to the

realization

of our

of

our

book.

of

using,

Theory.

of Bifurcation

in closing our gratitude

Dynamics sufficiently

to

those

have

who

In particular,

the

students-a

lively group consisting of unand graduate students of pure and applied and mathematics, dergraduate of science and engineering-helped our ideas and considerably in fixing Critical readings of the setting realistic bounds for our own enthusiasm.

enthusiastic

text

participation

and insightful

suggestions

by

Nathaniel

Chafee,

Brian

Coomes,

Philip)))

x

Greeting)

Davis,

Robert

Horta,

\037ahin

Ko.. is a small scalar

3

in Eq.

term

ds

==

The

0,

from

(5.8),

second-order

parameter,

we

can

the differential

1

determine

equation)

the function

,

(t

),

leC/'O)

equation jj + y3 - 2>\"y + y = 0, where - theory of sound and is known))) /1,) (5.10))))

m(t) the

arises == in

1)

Scalar

Autonomous

Equations)

IIiiIiiiiiiIi I)))

we present selected basic conchapter, opening about the geometry of solutions of ordinary differTo keep the ideas free from ential technical equations. the setting is one-dimensional-the scalar complications, this

In

cepts

I

these

ity,

pear in various

tion

of

we

examples,

To

ometrically.

as vector

conclude

facilitate

a theorem on what

explain

the

Following existence

geometric

simplic-

and

subject

a differential

analysis,

qualitative

our

and

reap-

a collecunique-

equation is concepts

ge-

such

in and limit set are included of stability of an equilibin determining stability. the role of linear approximation of a scalar the chapter with an example differential equacircle.) on a one-dimensional space other than the realline--a

field,

this discussion. rium point and

tion defined

we

to book.

the

throughout

state

first

Then

Despite their

equations.

are central

concepts

incarnations

ness of solutions.

We

differential

autonomous

i \037

orbit,

point,

equilibrium

The next

topic

is

the

notion

4

this

their

our notation

we establish

section

introductory

tions and

Equations)

and Uniqueness

Existence

1.1. In

Autonomous

Scalar

1:

Chapter

solutions.

Then,

for

differential

motivational

several

after

existence and uniqueness theorem. be an open interval of the real line IR and

equa-

examples,

I

Let

x : I ---+ IR;

t

\037

let)

x(t))

real-valued differentiable function of a real variable t. We will x to denote the derivative dx / dt, and refer to t as time variable. let) Also, independent

be a

use

the

or

the

notation

\037

f(x))

real-valued function. In Chapter 1, we

a given

equations

x

: IR ---+ IR;

f

be

we

a basic

state

of the

will

differential

consider

form)

x == f(x),)

(1.1))

x is an unknown function of t and f is a given function of x. Equation (1.1) is called a scalar autonomous differential equation; scalar because x is one dimensional (real-valued) and autonomous because the function f does not on t. depend I if interval We say that a function x is a solution of Eq. (1.1) on the == I. in a solution for all t will often be We interested E specific x(t) f(x(t)) of Eq. (1.1) which at some initial time we to E I has the value Xo. Thus will study x satisfying) where

x == f(x),)

Equation the

to as an

(1.2) is referred

solutions is

a

called

loss

of

through

of the

character

autonomous

there is no

solution

Xo.)

(1.2))

and problem any of its A useful consequence of in Eq. (1.2) is that equation

initial-value

Xo at to.

differential

in assuming

generality

==

x(to)

that the

initial

value-problem

is

with to == 0, and we will often tacitly do so. To wit, let x(t) be a solution of Eq. (1.2) through Xo at to and define y(t) = x(t + to). Now, observe that y(t) is a solution of Eq. (1.2) through Xo at zero since) specified

y(t) As you

through variables,\"

==

x(t

+ to)

may recall

Xo at to is by the

==

+ to))

f(x(t

from

your

given

implicitly,

==

and

f(y(t))

y(O)

==

Xo.)

a solution of Eq. studies, of \"separation the method

previous using

(1.2) of

formula)

x l

1

s XQ f ( )

ds =

t-

to,)

(1.3))))

1.1. Existence

function

the

One

is defined. integral on the left-hand

the

when

use this formula

to

It is

to

important

in this book is

5)

Uniqueness

the inverse of Occasionally, we will

finding

by

x(t)

this

equation.

of special

solutions

exhibit

purposes of illustrations. However, and one should these integrations solutions.

obtains

of

side

and

differential

for the

equations

it is impossible to perform general, not expect to obtain explicit formulas for this fact from the beginning. In fact, in

realize

to understand as

much as possible about the objective without the knowledge of an behavior of solutions of differential equations formula for the solutions. explicit and their Let us now equations give several examples of differential to realize some of the difficulties that arise in laying the solutions in order and the uniqueness of for the theory, that is, the existence foundations solutions of Eq. (1.2).

our

Example 1.1. The

the differential

Consider

example:

first

equation)

x == -x.)

It

can

be seen

through

at

Xo

it is

0, and

==

defined

only solution of Eq.

(1.4) satisfying 1.2. Finite time: Consider

Example

x

to

It is easy

== x

direct

by

verify

that

differentiation

simple

by

to

(1.4

for

the

2 x(O)

,)

substitution,

is a

e-txo

value

Question: x(O) == xo?

initial-value

problem)

initial

the

==

x(t)

t E IR.

all

==

is

))

solution this

the

I)

Xo.)

(1.5))

or using

formula

that

(1.3),

the

function) xo x(t) = 1 xot

solution.

is a \"nice,\"

the

Notice

solution

x(t)

the function

although

that,

is defined

on the

interval

2

is remarkably for Xo > 0, Xo < O. The importance on all of IR and defined

f(x)

(-00,

==

x

1/xo)

on (-00, +00) for Xo == 0, and (1/xo, +00) for is that the solution is not always of this example of definition of the solution varies with the initial the interval as t approaches the solution becomes unbounded Furthermore, interval of definition. of the I) boundary Example

1.3.

x == IX,)

A

solution

the problem

is given by which

solution

above

does

Consider

solutions:

Multiple

x(t)

==

x(O)

==

is identically

not have

(t +

xo,)

the initial-value with

x >

condition.

1/xo,

the

problem)

O.)

== 0, then there is also 2VXQ)2 /4. If Xo for the initial-value all t. Therefore,

zero

a unique solution through

Xo

at

zero.)))

6

1:

Chapter

Scalar

Autonomous

Equations)

the domain of f(x) == JX is naturally In this example, this situation arises a subset of ffi. In applications, often, cannot population of insects grow to be negative. (:;

restricted

to

instance,

a

for

The above show the necessity of certain conditions on the examples of solufunction f in order to guarantee the existence and the uniqueness We will state such a theorem tions to the initial-value problem Eq. (1.2). in the Appendix. also a more result and below, First, howpresent general we need to a small of notation. introduce ever, piece functions f : ffi ---+ ffi by We will denote the set of all continuous CO (ffi, ffi), and the set of all differentiable functions with continuous first 1 we will use en (ffi, ffi) to indicate derivatives Analogously, by e (ffi, ffi). order n. If the domain the functions with continuous derivatives up through of is a subset U of ffi, then we will use the notation functions CO (U, ffi), etc. If there is no ambiguity, we will usually omit the dependence on the 1 and simply refer to a member of one of these sets as a Co, e , domain continuous function of or en function, etc. In the case of a real-valued k ---+ 1 if all the first several ffi is said to be a e function variables, f : ffi

are continuous.

derivatives

partial

To emphasize xo

== 0

at to

for this

the

1.4.

If f E

infinite)

any Xo E ffi, to !3xo) containing

(Qxo,

Ixo

the initial-value

Also,

for all

==

t E Ixo, satisfying the

if Qxo is finite,

if !3xo is

finite,

interval (possibly '1'(t, xo) of

a solution

==

Xo,) condition

initial

'1'(0,

xo)

==

Xo.

I

==

+00,

1'1' ( t,

x 0) I

== +

00.

(3;o)

1 f E e (ffi, ffi), then 'P(t, xo) is unique on Ixo and derivaits first partial '1'( t, xo) is continuous in (t, xo) together with 1 tives, that is, 'P(t, xo) is a e function. (:;

in addition,

If,

interval Ixo possible largest the maximal interval of existence

The

mal

is an

0 and

then)

lim

called

xo)

Xo.

then)

t-+

(ii)

==

==

Solutions) there

x(O)

f(x),)

lim + I'P( t, xo) t-+a Xo) or,

of

'1'(0, xo)

problem)

x defined

and

x(t)

for

then,

ffi),

==

xo)

and Uniqueness

(Existence

eO(ffi,

often

will

we

'P(t,

words,

x(t) of Eq. (1.2) through use the notation '1'( t,

a solution

of

dependence

initial condition,

solution. In other

Theorem (i)

on the

interval

of existence

of

a solution

in

part of the

(i) of the theorem above solution '1'(t, xo). The maxi-

of Example

1.2 is shown in Figure

is

1.0.)))

1.1. Existence

o)

Maximal

1.0.

Figure

value x(O) = 1 is

initial

and

Uniqueness

t)

1)

interval of existence of the

of x

solution

= x2

with

1).)

(-00,

the function f may not be defined on all of JR. One that f E Cn(U, JR), where U is an open and bounded subset of Theorem 1.4 are the same case, the conclusions \037 \037 t that all of the limit of must as except points c.p(t, xo) Qt o (or t (3;o) to the of U. belong boundary Let us now return briefly to the notation c.p(t, xo) for the solution of an initial-value and reexamine it in light of our foregoing discussions. problem 1 For a given C function f, Theorem 1.4 implies that the family of all specific solutions of x = f(x) can be represented by c.p(t, xo) viewed as a function of two where t E Ixo and Xo E JR. As such, c.p(t, xo) is called the variables, of x = f(x). The domain of this function of two variables could be flow somewhat because the domain of t may depend on Xo, as seen complicated in Example 1.2. The fine structures of flows will be one of our in the main concerns For the moment, we will be content to introduce a chapters. following If f is a C 1 function, common name for our subject-dynamical systems. flow each rise to a the for t, then, map of JR into itself (with gives c.p( t, xo) \037 restricted Here are some of the possibly given by Xo domain) c.p(t, xo). of this important properties map: In applications, is situation of JR. In this

common

(i)

c.p(0,

(ii)

c.p( t

xo) + s,

= Xo,

xo) =

c.p( t,

c.p( s,

xo))

for each

t and s when the

map

either

on

side is (iii)

c.p( t, c.p(

-t,

defined, 1 xo) is a C map

for

each

t and

it has

a C1

inverse

by

given

xo).

itself satisfying these three properties on we can say in conclusion JR. So, dynamical system scalar autonomous differential equation gives rise to a

A map

of

JR

into

is called

that

the

flow

dynamical

a C1 of a

system)))

7)

8

on

are

There

JR.

Autonomous

Scalar

1:

Chapter

will see one such

Equations)

also other

ways

important

case

of

in

and we

systems

dynamical

obtaining 3.)

Chapter

1.1.

.

,. C/

Exercises

Show that the

hypotheses: a unique solution

Verifying o has

the

maximal

x

of

of existence

interval

0, then the solution apor tends to +00 as t \037 (3xo; see Figures 1.5a proaches an equilibrium point if solutions of the initial-value problem and 1.6a. Furthermore, for Eq. (1.1) are unique, then the solutions two different initial conditions with through Thus we have the lemma: < < Xo following Yo satisfy cp(t, xo) cp(t, Yo).

is very

It

In fact, the If f(xo) bit.

lem

(i)

(ii)

is

,+(xo)

tively,

Let

cp ( t,

Qxo

us now We

Yo) for

note,

==

all t if ,-

and

-00]

x is

an

illustrate however,

cp(t,

of the

xo)

initial-value prob-

Then

[respectively,

where

-00],

Xo.

a monotone function

cp(t, xo) is cp ( t, x 0)
0, the only orbit is (-00, +(0), and there is no equilibrium point. We have marked the directions of all these orbits in Figure 2.2. If the c is varied, as long as c < 0, the number and the parameter direction of the orbits remain the same; the is the shifting only change of the location of the equilibrium points :f: yCC . Sirnilarly, for all c > 0, there is only one orbit and its direction is from left to right. However, if of how small an amount c is varied, c == 0, regardless the number of orbits there are two for c and none for c > o. 0) < equilibria 0, changes: any c
1, ticularly Figure accessible diagrams mostof x (mA + 1) x details; in formula is An account of the reference m < 1.) m = 1, andis looss stability given [1979]. were first Wan [1978]. Strong resonances investigated by Arnold [1983] The case Takens and [1974]; an exposition is contained in Whitley [1983]. With these at our disposal, we now turn to generalities.) unresolved. still remains of fourth roots ofexamples unity was initiated by Poincare and studThe study of area-preserving maps Exercises) \037\037.o) for a proof of the ied by Birkhoff extensively [1927]. The main reference 2.1. the of in with orbit Exercise 1.5 the same structure. examples and Siegel is Moser TwistIdentify Theorem groups 1967] [1973]; see also Moser [1962and in a review in Exdescribed diagrams More of recent and Moser [1971]. by developments of thearebifurcation 2.2. Provide the details the computation Hamilto-))) for analytic formulated Moser ample 2.7.))) A comparable theorem was [1986]. usual

or

practice,

it would

B) \"Neimark-Sacker\"

appropriate I .. .. \302\267 . ....

39)

40

2:

Chapter

Bifurcations)

Elementary

2.3. Constant

and

\"logistic

density x(t)

of

such

the

population at a rate

grows

and h

are is

However, when the

- cx 2 -

its size

the

dynamics of the differential equation) The

the

reflect

when the

growth rate

intrinsic

Notice that the

population

density

population

is small.

large, growth is impaired because reflects this behavior.

gets

population

to

according

grows

h,)

c

k and

the

by

of harvesting.

rate to

proportional

== kx

positive;

the

rate.

constant

is governed

a population

all the coefficients

where

at a

is harvested

x

of

a population

that

Suppose

harvesting:

model\"

of,

for

the x 2 term overcrowding; of harvesting k and c, to determine the effect the problem is, for fixed Now, we are the population on the population. Since density cannot be negative, for x > O. For a positive initial of this equation interested in the solutions of value the population is exterminated if there is a finite population density, t such that cp( t, xo) == o. Without finding explicit solutions of the differential example,

equation, show the following: 2 0 < h < k / (4c), then there is threshold ( a) If the harvesting rate h satisfies such that if the initial size value of the initial size of the population On is below the threshold then the population is exterminated. value, then the the other hand, if the initial size is above the threshold value,

population

approaches

(b) If the harvesting rate exterminated regardless 2.4.

an

h

h

of its initial

that a

harvesting: Suppose as in the previous

Proportional

model\"

\"logistic

to the

portional

size

of the

point.

equilibrium satisfies

2

> k / ( 4c),

then the

is

population

size.

grows

population

but

exercise,

to the

according

is harvested

at a

rate

pro-

population:)

x

- cx 2 -

== kx

hx,)

constants. and h are positive Show that if k < h, then, regardless extermination tends toward initial density Xo > 0, such a population as t \037 +00, but is not exterminated in finite time. Also, analyze the fate in the cases k == hand k > h. the population

where

k, c,

of the

2.5.

The

Hydroplane:

rolling,

is

determined

rectilinear by a

motion

scalar mv

==

of a

differential

T(v)

hydroplane,

equation

-

ignoring

of the

pitching

of

and

form)

W(v),)

of the hydroplane, m is its mass, T is the thrust of the is the velocity It is reasonable to assume, for mechanism, and W is the resistance. the thrust is constant. The resistance, on the that approximately simplicity, other should increase with small and large v, but can be negative for hand, of the hydroplane and the intermediate values of the velocity due to rising motions of the hydroplane decrease of the wetted area. Discuss the possible for various values of the constant thrust.)))

where v driving

2.2.

In

this

Theorem

Function

Implicit

Implicit Function Theorem)

The

2.2.

The

a

we state

section,

known as the

turns out

which

Theorem,

mathematical

from

result

fundamental

Function

Implicit

to

analysis be

indis-

an

below version presented pensable tool in bifurcation theory. The simplified of equilibria of scalar differential is tailored for the study of bifurcations A more general form of this important theorem is given in the equations.

Appendix.

Let

-

A

IIAII of A to

(AI, . . . , Ak) be IIAII

we may

which of

vectors

Theorem 0 1 function

a vector in

For

IRk.

2.8.

==

as the

interpret

+ ... +

(AI

will say more

A. We

of

length

F:

that

Suppose

about

norms

IR

x

IRk

---+

(A, x)

IR;

r--t

F(A,

x),

is a

satisfying)

8>

are constants

and)

== 0

0)

and

0

(0, 0) #

ox

II All

< 8}

o.)

a 0 1 function)

0, and

TJ >

{A :

:

'ljJ

---+ IR)

that)

such

'ljJ ( 0)

if there

Moreover,

The Implicit following

== 0

is a

context.

F ( A,

and

(AO,

the equation

satisfies

and

on

\"norm\"

A%)1/2,)

of

there

the

7.

in Chapter

F(O,

Then

we take

now,

be)

xo)

E IRk

F(AO, xo)

'ljJ ( A

))

X IR ==

0,

for

== 0

such

that

then

Xo

II A II
\", x) is guaranteed

existence

Answer:

'lj; ( >..)

==

-

2.3. Earlier

linear

sin x;

with

>..)x

+

>..

-

of

In this section an equilibrium

essentially

be emphasized

of

cos(7r/6 +

the

equilibrium We

the

as in

the

following

(c)

solution

-1).

(1,

sin>..

for

satisfied

+ tanx.)

differential

specific

[Eq.

equations,

and investigated

(2.6)],

of the points as a function differential equation x == if the first term of the that,

a given show

at x is the

perturbations

same in

'lj;(>..)

Equilibria

consider

field f

is a unique

there ==

x);

(2.2)], cubic

point x. vector

the

general

that

we

that (J-L, y)

Function Theorem are

Implicit

Near

bifurcation

and

the function Theorem.

Function

Implicit

2.1 we considered three

Section

Taylor expansion then under rather

x is

(b) 1/2

[Eq. (2.1)], quadratic [Eq.

the stability f(x)

of the

Perturbations

Local

parameters.

the

the Implicit Function Theorem to show equation J-L + (1 - J-L)Y + y3 == 0 near

>.. +

in

by

2

+ x , determine

>...

2.8. Show that the conditions the following functions: (a)

(1 +

== >.. +

examples

analysis

mentioned

we

will

or

quadratic,

linear,

bifurcation

cubic,

of equilibria near above. It should

consider

the

effects

of)))

2.3.

Near

Perturbations

Local

Equilibria

our results are valid Thus, quite arbitrary, but small, perturbations. only a sufficiently small neighborhood around the equilibrium For point. == we shall assume that x has an at 0; if equilibrium point simplicity, I (x) we translate in can to a new coordinate as the not, always proof system, in

of

1.14.

Theorem

I: Hyperbolic

Case with

==

j(O) properties

of the

the higher

order

point

linear

approximation

1

in the Taylor structure of the

perturbations

the

effect

We

=1= o.

j'(O)

that Suppose I is a 0 function saw in Theorem 1.14 that the stability 0 of the differential equation x == j (x) is of the vector field near 0, that is,

equilibria.

equilibrium

by the

determined do not

0 and

qualitative

expansion

field

vector

the

of

zero.

near

flow

the

However,

if we make that influence question remains: what happens perturbations the constant and the linear terms? We will show below that the situation 2.1 also prevails in the general case. in Example To be precise, consider the perturbed differential equation)

x

where F :

x IR \037 IR;

IRk

==

r--t

(A, x)

(2.12))

x),)

F(A,

is a

x),

F(A,

C 1 function

satisfying)

aF

F(O, x)

==

and

j(x)

ax

==

(0, 0)

=1= o.)

j' (0)

(2.13))

Let us first the existence of equilibria of the perturbed equainvestigate tion (2.12). If F(A, 0) =1= 0, then the origin will no longer be an equilibrium point. However, from Eq. (2.13) and the fact that j(O) == 0, we have) == 0

F(O, 0) the

Hence,

8 > 0 and

Implicit 0, and

TJ >

aF

and

==

(0, 0)

ax

Function Theorem a 0 1 function 'ljJ(A)

I' (0)

=1= o.)

that

there

implies

for

defined

II All

constants

are

with

< 8

== 0

'ljJ(0)

such that)

F(A, every

Moreover, given

by

(A,

(A,

The

'ljJ(A)).

stability

Theorem

with

x ==

'ljJ(A)

behavior 1.14.

8 and


0 such

Thus,

'ljJ(0)

that,

(2.14))))

'ljJ(A)).

(A,

for

==

0, we

have

II All < 8,

\037; (0,

'ljJ(0))

==

the sign of Eq.

1'(0)

=1=

(2.14) is)

43)

44

2:

Chapter

Bifurcations)

Elementary

the stability type of the equilibrium the same as that of 1'(0). Therefore, is the same as the stability type of 'ljJ(A) of the perturbed equation (2.12) the equilibrium 0 of the unperturbed equation x = I(x). We can summarize the discussion above by saying that the flow near

to

a hyperbolic equilibrium point is insensitive vector field.

small

of the

perturbations

Case II: Equilibria with quadratic that I Suppose degeneracy. with 1(0) = 0, I' (0) = 0, but I\" (0) =1= o. This is the next order of complication that occurs when we cannot a decision about make the stability of an equilibrium on the based linearization. point Let us consider the perturbed differential equation) a

is

0 2 function

x = F : IRk x

where

F(O, x)

sion

IR

---+

= I(x),)

These conditions of F about the

8F

8

>

II All

(0,

8x

0,)

2F

( 0, 0 ) 8x 2 =

a(A)

and

its

=1= o.)

(2.16))

that the Taylor

expan-

2

+

c(A)2

for any

0,

and,

G

satisfies

the

x),

G(A,

IG(A,

t > 0, there x)1 < tlxl

differential

(2.2) depending on one

perturbation

satisfying)

form:)

a(O) = 0, b(O) = 0, c(O) = I\" (0) =1= 0 and 'TJ > 0 such that the function < 8 and Ixl < 'TJ. As an instance of Case II, let us recall

2 I(x) = x

function

= I \" ( 0 )

0 imply

x b(A)X +

+

02

is a

x), 8

=

0)

(2.15))

x),)

F(A,

together with f(O) origin has the following

F(A, x) = with

\037

(A, x)

IR;

F(A,

parameter

for

x =

equation (k

are

2

=

1):)

2

X =

F('x, x)

in Example 2.2 that two equilibria when Af\"

the

=,x + f\"(O)

.) \037

of this equation changes at A = 0 to no equilibrium when Af\" (0) > 0; behavior of this see Figure 2.2. We will show below that the bifurcation for the general case [Eqs. (2.15) and (2.16)]as well. simple example occurs To verify the assertion above, it is only necessary to demonstrate that = 0 for any small A has a graph which is like a the function F( A, x) near x the existence of a unique parabola. This can be accomplished by showing extreme point of the function F ( A, x) near x = 0 for small A. The extreme F of to the solutions x of the points correspond equation) We

from

saw

(0)

flow

< 0

8F

8x

(A, x)

=

O.)

(2.1

7))))

6)

On

and

Tori

generalization of the ideas from Secif a I-periodic nonautonomous differential is also periodic in x, then it gives rise to a equation on a torus (the surface of a doughnut). differential equation The dynamics of such equations are explored most convein terms of their Poincare which to maps, happen niently in the spirit of Chapter 3, we include a be maps on a circle. Accordingly, brief discussion of such maps and study a landmark the standard example, circle map. Poincare, in conjunction with his work on classical mechanics, was of differential the first to study vigorously the subject the flows for these equations two cases on a in circle his a Since particular maps. days, 2.2). deep These analyticalresults theory several values of a(A) (compare with can of with torus, Figure circle has The of this is to maps analytically emerged. purpose that whenchapter are out be summarized < 0 therepoint by saying a(A)/\" (0)merely a few facts and some will return to this We = rudimentaryequilibria near the origin,highlights. two hyperbolic is a 0 implies that there subject a(A) in Part IV and oscilfrom the > theory seminalandexamples explore when a(A)/\"(O) atseveral the origin, 0 there ofare equilibrium nonhyperbolic lations and Hamiltonian where tori are mechanics, omnipresent.))) about the naturally no equilibrium points origin. in the discussion It is important to observe above that the qualitative of the flow of the perturbed is determined from a structure equation (2.15) of the the function function parameter A, namely, single a(A) correspondof F(A, x). Thus, even there value though may be k ing to the extreme = . . . the bifurcation A of the , Ak), parameter components (AI, A2, (vector) of the perturbed on a single number, behavior equation (2.15) depends we occurs in a the When this situation bifurcation problem, say that a(A). original vector field 1 is a codimension-one bifurcation.))) In

this

chapter,

tion 4.3, we

show

as a

Circles)

that

46

2:

Chapter

Bifurcations)

Elementary

2.9.

Example

Two

consider the

differential

of a vector

A

example

x2

A2X +

A2) are two to the corresponds it is and , given by) ==

(AI,

==

the

Thus

two

+ A2 X

Al

small

parameters,

2 + x ,)

==

Al

points

of

for this

a(A)

function

the

x)

F(A,

==

Al +

\037A\037.)

curve

the

cross

we

equilibrium

function

The

parameters.

A2)

occur as

bifurcations are

a

of

example

on two

depending

minimum value

a(AI'

plane: there

field

equation)

x

where

one: As an

codimension

but

parameters

bifurcation

codimension-one

if

Al


none

and

A\037/4,

0)

A\037/4.

In applications, a single affect several parameter may of a the For expansion instance, consider perturbation. Taylor == x 2 of the vector field perturbation given by) f(x) 2.10.

Example

terms in the following

2 x == A

A is

where bifurcation

a scalar

parameter, and a of the

behavior

+ x2 ,)

+ 2aAx is

a

As before, the

constant.

given

equation depends 2 + 2aAx + x , which

perturbed

minimum

the

on

== value of the function F(A, x) == A 2 is equal to a(A) 2 2 term in the the linear A (1 a ). The sign of a(A) is determined by perturbation if lal > 1, and by the constant term if lal < 1. The bifurcation takes at A == 0 in both cases, but the flow is different depending on place whether lal < 1 or lal > 1. You are invited to draw the bifurcation diagram of the flow. 0 and representative pictures

Case III: Equilibria with

03-function

f (0)

==

0,

the level of complication

that cannot

3 that -x

==

f' (0)

equilibrium point at zero order terms of the Taylor We

cubic

with

occurs

degeneracy. I\" (0) == 0, but if the properties

expansion of f(x). (Section 2.1) in

have seen previously

at least two

were

parameters

f'\" (0)

of the from the linear

be determined

the

In particular,

=1= O.

or

all

dx -

we

of

the have

a

is

is

This near

flow

example

specific

to capture

needed

types of behavior of I under perturbations. in the perturbed the bifurcations equation

that I

Suppose

0,

the

second-

f(x)

==

possible studied

x 3 ; see ExamWe will show below that this example ple 2.6 and Figures 2.12 and is representative of what can happen in the general case near the equilibrium point x == 0 of I satisfying the conditions above when I is subjected are small together with their derivatives to \"nice\" perturbations that up 2.14.

through

order

three.)))

x

==

c +

2.3. More

the

consider

specifically,

perturbed

x= F :

where

x IR \037 IR;

IRk

and would plicated to the two-parameter

important

analysis

of

C3

function

case. In the

= fill (0)

satisfying)

and

perturbation,

to this

lengthy

com-

rather

ourselves

perturbation.

special

section

technical

is

confine

we first study an then show how to

below,

perturbation and

we

Therefore,

presentation

two-parameter

of:- O.)

and (2.19)

(2.18)

Eqs.

far afield.

too

two-parameter

three-parameter perturbation. the bifurcation present analysis perturbation F(A, x) with the following

by giving

a simple

A2),

a

for

A = about

two-parameter, expansion

Taylor

origin:)

F(A, x) with

c(O) 0 such

'TJ > Ixl

0)

(0,

first

We

(AI,

is a

of a

example

the

equation)

(0, 0) = 0,

ox

\037;:

this somewhat

We conclude

of

0,)

us

take

particular

a general

reduce

=

2 (0, 0)

bifurcation

A complete

differential

47)

Equilibria

(2.19))

o2F ox

Near

(2.18))

x),

F(A,

= f(x),

F(O, x)

Perturbations

x),)

F(A,

r--t

(A, x)

Local


O.

(0)

(2.20) is an

Equation of

'l/Jl(X) =

by

(2.21) and (2.22) near the

of a cusp in the (AI, are the parametric representation equations coincides with the curve) which near the origin approximately

These plane

f'\"

of Eqs.

49)

Equilibria

by)

A2(X) =

Eq.

computations above

A2(X)

and

Al(X)

If

of the

results

the

Near

Perturbations

Local

of a

example

field with cubic

a vector

perturbation

\"good\" two-parameter

degeneracy in the

that

sense

the

bifurcations

and the linear terms of the Taylor are determined only by the constant The term of the vector field. expansion C(A)x2/2 did not enter into the in the see Eqs. (2.25) and first to the cusp approximation (AI, A2)-plane; in A and c(O) = O. function is This is because the differentiable C(A) (2.26). the Taylor

Thus,

expansion

for

= ClAl

C(A)

Cl and

where

are

C2

hence,

constants;

C(A)X

2 =

be given

must

C(A)

+

C2 A 2

the term +

ClAlX2

+ ...

by)

,)

has

C(A)x2

C2A2X2 + . . .

the

form)

.)

is smaller than AI, and the x is small, the term ClAlX2 it is to be expected that the than A2. Therefore, bifurcations of Eq. (2.20). term C(A)x2 has little influence on the We now show that an arbitrary two-parameter perturbation of the can be reduced to cubic under certain reasonable conditions, degeneracy, Let J.l = (J.ll, J.l2) be two the special two-parameter perturbation (2.20). Observe

term

when

that,

C2A2X2

is smaller

parameters and

consider

about

the

expansion

F(J.l,

with are

b

x)

a(O) = b(O) > 0 and 17

11J.l11 < band

Ixi

=

the

X2 a(J.l)

=

with the following

F(J.l, x)

perturbation

Taylor

origin:)

+

2(0)

>

0 such


1. This suggests the following

lal

point.

3.8.

Theorem

stable

any

xl < 8, the

from

fixed

the

fixed

Proof.

the

of the

type

evident

unstable

linearization about

given in Theorem 1.14, we expect, of the fixed point x of a type

stability

stability

that a

with the

equation

is

stability

be

analogy

that the

if, for

stable

be

which

Definition 3.7. A fixed point x of J is said to it is stable and, in addition, there is an r > 0 n \037 +00 for all Xo satisfying Ixo - xl < T.

the

of

we make

equations,

said to

for

the inequality IJn(xo) - xl < if it is not stable. unstable

Xo satisfy

x is said

It

notions

to the

definitions:

following

of

of equilibria

to fixed points and in-

return

Analogous

properties.

stability

us

let

diversion,

if

IJ'(x)1

For

Let J be a C I map. A fixed point < 1, and it is unstable if IJ'(x)1 >

convenience,

the origin (0, 0).

Let

u

we first translate the point the new variable defined

be

x

of

J is

1. (x, by

x) u

asymptotically ==

(x,

- x-x.

J (x))

to

Then)))

73)

74

Chapter

3:

Scalar

Maps)

Xn + 1) X2)

Xn)

45\302\260 Line___)

a = 2.0)

Xo)

a = 0.5)

X1)

Xo)

a = -0.5)

X2)

a = -2.0

Figure

3.3.

Typical stair-step diagrams of linear map

Xn+l

== aXn.)))

3.2. the map

f

f(x + u)

g(u) Clearly,

g(O)

to

equivalent

f(x).)

studying the stability of the stability of the fixed (x + u). 0 and define)

E >

fix

min

m\037

+ s)l,

If' (x

max

M\037

Isl::;\037

Since

=

g(u)

if


1,

Suppose

that

Since

EO.

point

80)nl u l,

shows that there must be a u can be taken arbitrarily zero of 9 is unstable.

Let us return

to

J2

computing

with

difference equation (3.5) is

of the

value close

New-

equiv-

map)

2

3.4 the

+

1

x

'

of

graph

this

orbits, one with

that there

two

approximate

o.)

m\037o >

(1 +

inequality

solutions

in Figure

course,

n >

---+ +00.

of its positive from

of

that

>

x

diagram

3.6, that

0 such

f(x)= We

1. Furthermore,

M\037
zero, this implies that the fixed

alent

that

have)

we

asymptotically stable. part of the theorem observe that,

of n, to

>

n

for

0 such

Definition

E in

M\037
as

M:lul) E >

1, M: so the fixed point is

prove

there

0 and

i=

8=

since

Also,

and

---+ +00

M\037lul.)

< M:E
..)

small.

To

define

T(>\",

x), we

use the

F(>\",

T(>\",

Here

is a that)

a(>..)

+

+ b(>\x")

x):)

x).)

G(>\",

that of the theorem imply small. b( >..) i= 0 for >.. sufficiently = 0 is equivalent to the equation x = T(>\", x) x) with)

The hypotheses 1'herefore, F(>\",

pose

x) =

of F(>\",

expansion

Taylor

x)

F(>\",

x) =

-

x).)

b(>..)-lC(>\",

the convergence

illustrating

example

specific

= -b(>..)-la(>..)

>.. +

(1 +

+ x

>..)x

of

the

iterates.

Sup-

2 ,)

>.. is a scalar Then the function parameter. 'ljJ(>..) of the Implicit Function Theorem is 'ljJ(>..) = ->... Recover this function the method of using For this purpose, that successive approximations described above. compute = ->\"(1 + >..)-1 - (1 + >..)-lX 2 . Then, take>.. = 0.1, >.. = 0.3, >.. = 0.5, T(>\", x) in initial value Xo = O. Do you observe any difference etc., and iterate with the rate of convergence for different values of >..?)

where

A

aspects

study of this 5. Chapter

We {XO,

of maps,

class

restricted

certain

be

of Monotone

Bifurcations

3.3.

begin

of

differential We

class.

will

some

introducing

by

of f,

Xl, X2, ..., ...} monotone nondecreasing X n ,

Maps)

called monotone maps, play In this section equations. apply the results to differential

if

where

terminology. Xn+l

==

f(xn)

the

a central we

undertake

role in the

equations

in

A positive orbit ,+ == for n > 0, is said to is nondecreasing, that

{xn} > X n for every positive is, Similarly, ,+ (xo) is said to be Xn+l < if monotone X for n every positive integer n. Combinnonincreasing Xn+l these two we that notions, simply say ing ,+ (xo) is monotone if it is either

monotone nondecreasing monotone

map

if every

or

sequence n. integer

monotone

nonincreasing.

positive orbit ,+ (xo)

of

f

is a

Finally, we call f monotone sequence.)))

a

81)

82

Scalar

3:

Chapter

Maps)

If f is a C 1 function with f'(x) 3.14. > 0 for all x in the domain of definition of f, then f is a monotone map, that is, the positive orbit of is a initial condition monotone Xo sequence. ,+ (xo) any From the Mean Value we have Theorem, Proof. Lemma

-

Xn+l

for some

xn.

For the

-

Xn+l

of

purposes

for

X n ,

f to

we will require

dynamics,

X n

-l))

n,

positive integer

every

- Xo. 0

Xl

-

= f'(xn)(X n

n -l)

f(X

C

least

at

be

the

has

1

with

and refer to such an f simply as a monotone map. is monotone, then the inverse of f, exists. We will use the f-l, the n-fold of f-l with itself. composition f-n to denote

derivative,

positive

If f notation

If f is

3.15.

Definition

of points

of Xo

of

-

f(x n )

Therefore,

that

sign as

same

=

X n

f-l

Xo,

defined

is

monotone, then the negative . . ., and is denoted

(xo), f-2(xO), to be ,(xo)

,+

is

Xo

the

set

The orbit,

(xo).

(xo).

U,-

(xo)

of

orbit by,-

The geometry of orbits of a monotone map is very similar to that of a scalar differential the fixed points act like equilibria, and we can equation: use arrows to indicate the direction of other orbits under forward iteration. to study bifurcations of fixed of monotone maps we points Consequently, need the results in Section as we shall do now. 2.3, only to reinterpret For of let us assume that the notation, map simplicity f has a fixed = if at x we can coordinates to make it so. Fur0; point not, change so in that 0 that is monotone a > thermore, suppose f sufficiently f'(O) small neighborhood of the origin. the perturbed map F(A, Consider x) on k parameters

depending

F : If

in x

the

is that of

of

analysis

of the

zeros

the

\037

(A, x)

of

value

small

fixed

A2, . . . , Ak):

(AI,

C 1 function, then

is a

each

for

x JR \037 JR;

JRk

x)

F(A,

A

A.

it

that

follows

each

for

Now,

of F(

points

with

x)

F(A,

A,

x)

F(O, x)

F(A,

fixed

x)

A,

the

is equivalent

is

= f(x).

also

key

monotone

observation

to the

analysis

function)

x)

F(A,

have

-

x.)

the bifurcations of zeros of a function, of under various types of hyequivalently, equilibria, on the linear, quadratic, and cubic terms. We now translate those potheses results for bifurcations of fixed points of monotone maps.) In

2.3 we

Section

the

or,

Case

C1

map

I: with

analyzed

bifurcations

f(O) = 0 and

F ( 0, x )

Points.

Fixed

Hyperbolic

f'(O)

= f (x

=11.

aF )

Suppose

Consider

and

ax

that

a C 1 map

(0, 0 )

= f , (0 )

f is

a monotone,

F(A, x) satisfying i= 1.)))

3.3.

Figure

3.8.

stable

Asymptotically

O.5x persists

A +

as

A is

hyperbolic

of Monotone

Bifurcations

fixed point of

F(A, x)

varied.)

the perturbed Then, for IIAII sufficiently small, map F has point near zero whose stability type is the same as the stability point zero of the unperturbed map f.) 3.16.

Example

map

f(x) =

and

its

one-parameter

F(A,

of the parameter For each value whose stability type is the same for

the

the

diagrams

stair-step

parameter

linear map: Let us consider perturbation given

One-parameter

O.5x

A.

0)))

Maps

x)

of the

the

fixed fixed

linear

by)

= A+O.5x.)

A, there is a unique the fixed point

as

of the

a unique

perturbed

map

for

F

fixed point hyperbolic A = O. See Figure 3.8 for several

values

of

83)

84

Scalar

3:

Chapter

Maps)

2 monotone, C

f is a a Consider

C2

there

Then

extreme

the

The

( 0, 8x

82 F

0) =

1,

\"

f

points

one

fixed

point

of F,

no

fixed

point

of F

(0)

values

3.17.

===>

> 0

of

= 0,

0:(0)

===>

which

A.

map f(x) = it is monotone.

the

case,

of

f

given

by

2

F(A,X)=A+X+X

3.9. In this

in Figure

to

corresponds

of F,

quadratic map: Consider small neighborhood of zero so that of the one-parameter perturbation

bifurcations

=1= O.

that

One-parameter

a sufficiently

Suppose

f\" (0)

( 0 ) =1= O.

fixed

illustrated

are

0) =

0, 8x 2 (

two

===>

= 0 ( A) f\" (0)

small

local

1, but

(0) < 0

sufficiently

in

=

(0)

x) - x such

O:(A)f\"

x + x2

= 0, f'

f(O)

is a function O:(A), satisfying value of the function F(A,

0:

Example

8F

= f (x,)

O:(A)f\"

for

Degeneracy.

Quadratic

with

map

x) satisfying

F(A,

map

F ( 0, x )

with

Points

Fixed

II:

Case that

we

have

O:(A) =

A and

Therefore, when A < 0, there are two fixed points; at A = fixed point; for A > 0, there is no fixed point of F(A, x). 0

f\"(O) 0, there is

= 2.

one

with Cubic Degeneracy. Suppose that f f' (0) = 1, f\" (0) = 0, but f'\" (0) =1= o. A complete bifurcation analysis of an arbitrary C 3 perturbation F(A, x) of of Therefore, we confine our discussion to the analysis f is difficult. a \"typical\" of a two-parameter example perturbation. As in Case III of Section 2.3, under mild of fixed hypotheses, study of local bifurcations F of can reduced to this The be points example. map any two-parameter details are identical to the ones given previously. Points

Fixed

III:

Case

is a

3 monotone, C

map

with

f(O) = 0,

3.18. Two-parameter cubic Example map: - x 3 in a small of the neighborhood origin the two-parameter, A = (AI, A2), perturbation

Consider so that f

x

F(A, x) = there is a

. . . The trated

the

cusp

in

are

three

there

Al

+

(1 + A2)X

(AI, A2)-plane such that fixed points of F(A, x) for

the map is

f(x)

monotone.

==

For

of f given by - x3 of (AI, A2)

values

inside the

cusp, there

is

one

fixed

point of F(A,

x)

for

values

of

(AI, A2) outside

the

cusp, are

there

if (AI, possible

two

fixed points of F( A, x) for values of (AI, A2) on the cusp = (0, 0). 0), and one fixed point if (AI, A2) bifurcations of fixed points of F listed above are illus-

=1= (0,

A2)

local

in Figure

3.10.

0)))

3.3.

Figure 3.9. Bifurcations origin: values of A are

of fixed

-0.1,

points

0, and

0.1.)))

Bifurcations

of F(A, x)

== A

of Monotone

+ x

2 + x

near

Maps

the

85)

86

3:

Chapter

Scalar

Maps)

A1)

Figure

3.10.

of

Bifurcations

F()\",

x)

=

(1 +

)..1 +

)..2)X

- x 3 .)

if f is not monotone, its hyperbolic Even fixed points persist under small perturbation. Nonhyperbolic fixed of points f, however, can undergo no counterparts bifurcations with in our catalog of bifurcations of equilibria of scalar differential now We turn to one such of bifurcation equations.

importance.)

great

Exercises)

3.12.

4CV.O)

A trans critical bifurcation: a transcritical undergoes

this map with the 3.13.

A saddle-node a saddle-node

differential

Show

that

the map

bifurcation at the equation

bifurcation: Show bifurcation at the

that parameter

parameter

in Example the

map

F()\",

value)..

x)

F()\",

value)..

=

(1 +

+ x )..)x = O. Compare

2.3.)

x)

= eX -

).. undergoes

= 1.

3.14. Find a value of the parameter).. at which the map F()\", x) = ).._x 2 undergoes a local bifurcation. Identify the bifurcation and draw three representative to illustrate your bifurcation.))) stair-step diagrams

2

3.4.

3.4.

Bifurcation

Period-doubling

In this bolic

we

section,

fixed

to perturbations. As

we

bifurcation that a nonhyperwhen f is subjected

an important

investigate

x with

point

87)

Bifurcation

Period-doubling

f'(x) = -1

is

to undergo

likely

saw in previous examples, it flips a point close to

monotone and

when f'(x)
0, there period 2. Furtherorbit is asymptotically stable [respectively, unstable] if more, the period-2 at the origin is an unstable [respectively, asymptotically stable] fixed point this value of A. Proof. fixed

Periodic points

F 2 (A, x) a zero of

points of of F 2 (A, x)

period 2 ==

of

the

A, F( A,

F(

map

F(A,

x) correspond

x)), equivalently, to

the

to

zeros

the

of

- x. However, because of condition x == 0 is point (iii), the fixed this equation but its minimal period is 1. Therefore, to avoid this and locate only the periodic of minimal period 2, we need to points

point analyze

zeros

the

of the

function)

1

-

x)

2

[F

(A,

x)

-

x] .

To the first several accomplish this, we begin, as usual, by determining terms of its Taylor expansion. Let us use the notation to denote \"prime\" the derivative with respect to x and compute some derivatives:)

2 [F

the 2two

(A, x)]'

==

F'(A,

F(A,

x)) F'(A,

x),)

For any[F'(A, is a unique intervals. Xo in+ (-00, point x)]2 Xl), there F\"(A, F(A, x)) F'(A, F(A, x)) F\"(A, x).) = on such that t 01. If we let Xo depending cp( XQ ' xo) In particular, then h we is ahave) homeomorphism. To extend h, let h(Xl) = (3l), origin, h(xo) = 1/J( -t XQat' the r--t Xl r--t as Since now the map h : (-00, Xl] ---+ (-00, Xl. Xo Xl, h(xo) Xl] 2 2 2 == == == F 0 ==0.))) so defined is a 0, 1,) ( ( ) homeomorphism.))) 0)]' [ [f ]' [F (0, 0)]\" [f2(0)]\" of

value

[F

open (A, x)]\"

t XQ

of

==

time

3.4. It follows from these is given by) origin

the

that

formulae

of F2(A,

expansion

Taylor

89)

Bifurcation

Period-doubling

x)

about

the

2

F

a(A) and

functions

the

where

= (1 +

(A, x)

=

a(O) the

Therefore,

1

2

x [F Since

the of

are

the zeros,

If the

x

0,)

=

b(O)

+ . . . ,)

we have

.)

[f2 (0)]'\" been

a(A)

x

is)

seeking

b(A)

x

+6

2

+....)

(3.14))

analysis

slope

A

in a

(1 +

< 0, to determine the cubic function

(0)]'\"

[f2

consider

we

neighborhood A)2

of

of

the

origin,

Example 3.22.

Continuation

of

3.12 and

in Example

its

and x\037,

Similarly,

its

(1 +

if

0 is

A)2 >

1,

(;

Let us now return

to

the

given

perturbation

one-parameter

x\037).

be greater

is stable.

orbit

three

F(A, 0 and


0 and 0 is unstable, then the period-2 map

3

b\037A)

x\037) }.

case

orbit,

simple

the

F(A,

{x\037,

period-2

+

of the zeros of this function is identical to in II of Case Section 2.3 for bifurcations already given In fact, equilibrium points with quadratic degeneracy. > 0, then there is no zero of Eq. (3.14). If A [f2(0)]'\" < 0, to a single period-2 two zeros of Eq. (3.14) which correspond

nonhyperbolic

In

2

satisfy)

b(A)

(A,X)-X] =A(2+A)+T

if A [f2(0)]'\"

orbit,

x

have

we

then there

a

X +

\037A)

expansion

Taylor

=1= 0,

b( 0)

one

2 A)

by

= -x

f(x)

Since

f2(x)

easy to

= x -

verify

satisfied. Thus, orbit

of

minimal

and 3.12. We

1.

For

- 3x 2 ,

18x3 all

that

each

for

period

x) =

F(A,

-(1 +

-

A)X

27x 4 , we

-

of the small

have [f2(0)]'\" remaining conditions

positive

2 which is

value of

A,

= of

A)X

-108

asymptotically stable;

.

=1= O.

3.21

Theorem

is a

there

2

(3 +

It

is are

unique periodic see

3.11

Figures

(;)

conclude

this section

notational

with

simplicity,

several

remarks

we assumed

x =

regarding this

0;

3.21. always be

Theorem can

achieved by translation. 2.

The

nonvanishing

assumption

placed by a condition is always satisfied.)))

on the

on the third second

derivative

derivative

because

be

cannot

[/

2

(0)]\"

re= 0

258

Linear

8:

Chapter

Systems)

.... . \" ,) \037....,.......-)

....................... .................... ............ ..) t)

\\y>) /\302\273){).,

!::,i!\"!!:::f::!:':!! .\".\" \". ...................) ...................... . ....................... ....................... ...............)

.:.:::.:.:.::::::::::::.:....... \" ,) \0370\037jliillli)

Poincare map

8.11.

Figure

The behavior of of the iterates of the

of Eq.

solutions

C : ill?

(8.32),

see

you

linear will

Poincare

undertake a detailed

that

its stability

generalized to

are easily

the

dynamics

map) xO

\037 C

of the

map

of planar

study

ones, in Chapter 15. For find the few remarks below

and

point

xO

ill?;)

in

reflected

,)

linear system

I-periodic

8.11.

Figure

We will the

as the

be viewed

should

which

\037

(8.32) are linear

two-dimensional

linear system.)

a l-periodic

of

have

we planar

the

moment,

acceptable.

developed This maps.

maps, including, of course, however, we trust that The notions of a fixed

3 for

in Chapter essentially

scalar

maps

entails replacing in several norms, Definitions 4.9 and

scalar with and absolute values with quantities vectors, definitions in Chapter 3. With similar replacements, of stability, 4.10 are also readily generalized to yield definitions asymptotic of the I-periodic system (8.32). stability, and instability of a solution A periodic to a fixed point of the solution of Eq. (8.32) corresponds linear and the of the planar map periodic solution of stability type (8.34), is of the fixed the same as the point Eq. (8.32) stability type corresponding in particular of the map (8.34). Notice that the zero solution of Eq. (8.32) to the fixed the of C at the origin. We now summarize point corresponds main implications of these remarks for the zero solution of Eq. (8.32).

Lemma in Eq. (i)

If

Let Then (8.33). 8.22.

IJ.-lil

1, for i




== 2

-..\\.)

(3.16))

that the following lemma shows occurs for initial conditions in

map

f(..\\,

x).)

f'(..\\,

..\\,)

the

4,

logistic

that

Suppose

==

0)

(3.15): > 1, then

0 or Xo


O. Thus, The case 0.5 < Xo < 1 follows from the same argument by noting

We can say limn\037+oo

manner

this,

first

if

Xo

n

\037 +00.

=I-

==

the first

that

iterate

the

about

more

f(..\\,

that

xo)

lies

in the

interval (0, 0.5).

Consequently,

it

one iteration, at most 2, that after (3.16) see Figure 3.13. solutions approach x). monotonically; to it If 2 < A < 3, then x). is still attracting globally but the approach from see Figure 3.14. is no longer monotonic (this is expected linearization); in this case is somewhat more difficult. You should determine 'The proof in the intermediate case ..\\ == 2. what happens is evident

=>

..\\ == be

from Eq.

3 : The

determined

when

1
1, then the solution is again defined for all t. Otherwise, 4.2. For to == of0, X, then the solution is defined only on a finite interval; see Figure we are led to the following of two with invariant a periodsets:))) of 27r. I)))) that solution with Ixo definition notice every I < 1 is periodic

110

4:

Chapter

Scalar

Nonautonomous

Figure 4.2.

Figure

4.4.

Example

Periodic

4.3.

Equations)

flow of

limit: Consider

this equation is given

t.p(t, to,

Notice approach

xo) =

e-(t-to)[xo -

-x +

the

4.5. Limit is

no

-x + cos

differential

t.)

equation)

t.)

cos

by +

\037(sinto

costo)]

that all solutions have the same asymptotic the periodic solution \037(sin t + cos t);

Example

= (cos t)x 2 .)

of x =

Trajectories

x = The

of x

Trajectories

.

x = -x

+

1 1 - - t

fate see

+

\037(sint

Figure

for t 4.3.

the differential

Consider

solution:

+

t 2)))

cost).

---+ +00

: they

I)

equation)

4.1.

Figure 4.4. for

x E III

and t >

1. The r.p ( t,

solution

( t-t 0 )

Xo

that

a solution

solution approaches

every

differential

the

of

as

zero

t

---+

see Figure

equation;

+

to )

( Notice

+ lit - 11t2 .)

1

-

of Solutions

Properties

xo) is given

t.p(t, to,

= e_

to, xo)

= -x

of x

Trajectories

General

by)

1 t,\"

but

+00,

x(t)

== 0

is not

4.4. I)

little that can be said about the general qualitative propdifferential of arbitrary nonautonomous scalar equations. in t, we shall see shortly that However, when the function f(t, x) is periodic case is very similar to the autonomous the qualitative behavior of solutions as is evident in if we replace equilibrium points with solutions, periodic we will derive of this 4.4. Before delving into the details subject, Example nonautonomous linear formula for solutions of a general a useful explicit is very

There

of solutions

erties

differential

equation.

4.6.

Example

Variation

x) nonautonomous

x where a(t) of Eq.

and

(4.2)

is

tial

when

function

constant is

b(t)

formula is ==

0, the

multiplied varied

Consider the

formula.

linear

(in

+ b(t),)

a(t)x

(4.2))

functions.

The solution t.p(t,

to,xo)

by

ft du = e Jj '0 a(u) xo)

This imposing because

==

continuous

scalar

are

b(t)

given

to,

r.p(t,

constants

the

of

equation)

with

t + [xo the

called

e

i to)

constant.

a function

of

t.)))

du

b(s) dS] .

( 4.3))

of the constants formula solution is an exponenthe case,

variation

homogeneous

by a

fS Jj '0 a(u)

In

the

nonhomogeneous

case,

the

111)

112

Nonautonomous

Scalar

4:

Chapter

Despite its defined

formula

looks,

we

(4.2),

ft

If x(to)

==

then

Xo,

y.)

equation (4.2) in the

the differential

Yo and

==

y(to)

a(u)du

== eJto

-

.

== e

y

t

to

respect

of this

solution

the

obtain

with

back to

Now,

returning

enjoy

performing

some

of

the

ft du J to a( u)

differential

b( t ) .) we

equation,

integrate

simply

:)

==

y (t)

t - fS a(u) du e Jjto

Yo +

the

i

variable

we recover

x,

you may

integrations,

we have

solutions

explicit

ds.

b( s )

to)

the

in

used

the solution (4.3). If you this formula to obtain above. 0) examples

use

to

wish

,.(/.0)

Exercises)

4.1. In Example 4.3, x

the

4.2. Write

of

variation

x(O)

x( t)

4.5.

and only Another

l if

+ b(t),

(a) If

Jo

(b)

If

maximal interval

discuss the

and

of xo.)

for the equation x

formula

==

b(t),

where

ft a(u)du = e Jj '0 xo

of

solutions

the

==

a(t)x,

t

e

I8

of x

==

au()

with

f(x( s))

-(sin

there

==

+ f(x)

a(t)x

t)x + 1

ds.)

as t --t +00. solution

a nontrivial

is

0 < t

of x

du

I0

Show that x

problem

a(u) du

t +

solution

the

that

Show

< 1, satisfying

x(O)

==

of the x(l)

l Jo a( u) du

==

if

== O.

the boundary-value Consider problem x boundary-value problem: == Prove the following: with 0 < t < 1, satisfying x(l). x(O) a( u) du i= 0, then there is a unique solution.

a(t)x

l

Jo

== 0

to

function

constants

problem:

boundary-value

boundary-value

4.6.

as a

function.

the behavior

Discuss A

t )x , take

(cos

for linear equations: == Xo satisfies)

Formula

with

==

continuous

is a

b( t)

2

of solutions

of existence

4.4.

new

becomes)

variable

4.3.

To

derive.

new variable y

the

introduce

by)

X

To

fact rather easy to

is in

(4.3)

in Eq.

term a(t)x

the

eliminate

Equations)

0, then

there is a 1

eJ.'

1

solution

a(u) du

b(s) ds

if and

=

O.)))

only

if)

==

4.2. How

exist in this

solutions

many

boundary-value problems: Discuss in the previous exercise for = = et l ; 1, (a) a(t) b(t) = sin t, a(t) b(t) = sin t; (b) = sin 27ft, (c) a(t) b(t) = sin 27ft;

problem

(d)

4.2. In

= sin

a(t)

we begin our

section,

tonomous differential we

study

x= Briefly, assume

Let us

1;

class of nonau-

special

important

the function t with a period

with

is

an

f(t, x) of

the

has

More

1.

addi-

specifically,

equation)

x))

we say f(t, x) the period to be

of

in

differential

f(t,

following

of the boundary-value specific coefficients:

where

equations

the

consider

will

solutions

Equations)

property that it is periodic

tional

the the

t.)

of Periodic

Geometry this

= sin

b(t)

27ft,

Equations

case?)

More

4.7.

of Periodic

Geometry

l-periodic if not,

+ 1,

f(t

x) =

f(t,

(4.4))

x).)

in t. For simplicity we can always rescale

of

we

notation,

t to

make it so.

with certain will be general observations; specific examples in the subsequent sections. of f, the solutions Because of the periodicity of Eq. (4.4) possess certain properties which are useful in determining the asymptotic behavior of the solutions. In order to take of these properties listed below, advantage we will assume throughout this chapter that of Eq. (4.4) are the solutions defined for all t E IR. It is easy to see by direct substitution that if x( t) is a solution of Eq. (4.4), then for any integer k, x(t + k) is also a solution. Let t.p(t, to, xo) be the solution of Eq. (4.4) through Xo at to. The observaof initial-value tion above, in conjunction with the uniqueness of solutions that) problems, implies proceed

forthcoming

t.p(t

t.p(t + The

geometric

translated val

1, to,

+

xo)) on the

2]

1, to

+ 1, xo)

1, to, xo) =

interpretation

horizontally,

[to + 1, to

+

cp(t,

to,

=

t.p(t,

to,

cp(to +

xo),)

1, to,

(4.5))

of Eq. (4.6) is illustrated in Figure

the piece of the solution t.p( t, to, xo) on with coincides the piece of the solution t.p(t,

interval

[to, to

+

1].)))

(4.6))

xo)).)

4.5: when the interto,

t.p(to +

113)

114

Nonautonomous

Scalar

4:

Chapter

Equations)

x)

to ,

( t, \037

+ 1 , to,

\037 (to

x0

))

/ + 1,

(to , \037 (to

C/J1)

to,

Xo )))

(to,

Xo ))

/ iP(t, to,

In the

invariance of

Translation

4.5.

Figure

+ 1

I to I I I)

to (= 0))

xo))

+ 2

I to I I)

of i-periodic

solutions

t)

equations.)

of Eq. (4.4) certain special solutions, namely, 1are of As we shall see shortly, ones, I-periodic great significance. of the solutions nonautonomous role similar periodic equation (4.4) playa x = f(x). Analogous to that of equilibria of the autonomous to equation our presentation in Section 2.4, we begin with the following definition:

qualitative study

the

Definition 4.7. x =

f(t, x) is

solution

A

a

called

t.p(t

t.p(t + T,

moreover,

If,

called the

minimal

solution

T-periodic

+ T,

xo) of a l-periodic

t.p(t, to,

to, xo) =

to, xo)

A solution if is 1 periodic f(t, x) 4.8.

Lemma x = Proof.

then


E for all t The < solution to. to, Yo) to, xo)1 periodic cp(t, if is to be it is not said unstable stable. xo)

solution

ity

Ir.p(t,

r.p( t,

to,

Definition 4.10. be asymptotically Yo satisfying

xol

an

of

to,

Icp(t,

r.

stable

asymptotically

the examples

back to

in the

previous

periodic solution, you section, in particular,

4.4.

Example

begin our investigation For this purpose, we

We now of

such that
0, to, xo)1 -+ 0 as t -+ +00 for cp(t, yo) cp(t, to, xo)

is stable

if it

Iyo

to refer

wish

solution

periodic

illustration

As an may

A stable

of to,

independent all

115)

Equations

on to)

not

and

of Periodic

Geometry

(4.4).

Eq.

that the

the

asymptotic that

suppose

of the solution cp( t, sequence of functions on

behavior

asymptotic

at

looking

the

of will

following [0,

is increasing in U+ and for all t > 0; see

bounded

any solution

u_

O},)

of

period

that

Ic(t)1

satisfies

the

+ M

0 and

{ (t,

A solution remains


O. 0, large, Ixol II(xo) II(xo) the of II must cross the that II has a fixed Therefore, is, diagonal, graph to a solution point corresponding I-periodic (t). We now show the uniqueness of . If we let y(t) - x(t) (t), then Eq. (4.12) becomes) iI

The and are

==

expression

'P

-(

+ y)3

inside

+

3 ==

-y{(

+ y)2

the braces is a positive

y, that is, it is nonnegative If you have no previous zero. +

solution.

a periodic

approaches

and

+

y) +

definite

vanishes

knowledge

( +

of

2}.)

quadratic

form

only when both quadratic

forms,

in

variables

consider)))

126

Scalar

4:

Chapter

Nonautonomous

Equations)

variables inside the braces as a function of two independent the expression that the expression u = 4> + y and v = 4>, and find its zeros. This shows if y f o. This implies that is positive inside the braces y( t) \037 0 as t \037 +00. is stable and every the solution Therefore, I-periodic asymptotically 4>(t) solution of Eq. (4.12) tends to (t) as t \037 +00. Thus, 4>(t) is the unique that the Poincare solution of Eq. (4.12). This result implies map I-periodic of Eq. (4.12) looks like that of Example 4.11; see Figure 4.7.0 qualitatively we investi4.19. In a fluctuating environment: In this example = of the x ax Let a logistic equation gate generalization r(t), k(t) (1 x). and consider functions the equation) be I-periodic, continuous, positive Example

x = r(t) x 1 -

[

can

One

regard

population where

this differential

exhibit periodic Let us first show

k( t)

intrinsic

the

equation as a

this

that

seasonal)

equation

for

model

rate r(t) and

growth

example,

(for

\302\267) k\037t) ]

the

the

of a

growth

carrying

capacity

fluctuations.

has at

least

two

I-periodic

solu-

To solution. The trivial solution x(t) - 0 is obviously a I-periodic if is a solution with that < look for a second observe 0, solution, x(t) x(O) is no I-periodic then x(t) < 0 for all t > 0 and thus there solution with we must show that there is a I-periodic negative initial data. Consequently, < k(t) < KM for initial data. To let Km this solution with end, positive > some constants KM, Km, K M . Then for any solution x(t) satisfying x(t) 0 < x(t) < Km, then we have x(t) < o. Also, if x(t) is a solution satisfying > O. Therefore, any solution x(t) with initial data 0 < x(O) < Km x(t) and approach a for all t E JR, approach zero as t \037 -00, must be bounded this I-periodic solution I-periodic solution (t) as t \037 +00. Furthermore, < 4>(t) < KM. has the property Km It is possible to show that 4>( t) is the only I-periodic solution with initial data; hence, it is asymptotically stable. It is not entirely positive trivial to prove this fact; see the exercises. 0

tions.

We end ble

this section

generalizations

tion with

periodic

examples

=

it,

b,

and

above.

and problems related to possithe Riccati equainstance,

For

coefficients,)

\037\037

where

remarks

some

with

of the

b(r)

+ a(r)x

- c(r)x 2 ,)

with I-periodic functions c(-r) > 0 for 4.19. The form of this equation can be simplified the independent variable T to t through the formula Then the Riccati equation becomes)

c are

continuous,

all

T, generalizes Example if we change somewhat T =

J\037

c-

1

(s)ds.

x =

b(t) +

2 a(t)x - x ,)

(4.13

))))

4.4. where a = ale and in absolute value, periodic solutions

are

see the

such solutions;

the

Consider

x=

3

_x

arguments

of

for

is no

the

I-periodic solutions of number

odd

an

be

The

solutions?

(4.14) is

1.

special

difficult;

Eq.

exercises.)

,.c::>teo)

that the

4.16. Show

If

equation

I-periodic

and e(t) are

d(t),

c(t),

x =

+ c(t)x

2

+ d(t)x

+

show that

the

e(t))

one I-periodic solution. is unAlso, if this I-periodic solution show that there must be another I-periodic solution. Show that x < 0 if x is large enough, and x > 0 if -x is large enough.

Hint:

that

Suppose

I(x)

\037 +00

differential

I is as x

x =

equation

Hint: Use the 4.19. Hyperbolic

Mean

with

function

and

- I(x)

Value

Show that

\037 -00

+ c(t),

where

solution

Equation: the

Riccati

> 0

for

as x

\037 -00.

all

x and Show

satisfying that the

I-periodic c(t) is a continuous which is asymptotically stable.

Theorem. solution

I-periodic

If a(t) and equation)

x=

the

are

b(t)

b(t)

c.p(t,

I-periodic

hyperbolic

solutions, that is, Poincare map are isolated.

Riccati

I' (x)

f(x)

I-periodic

is isolated: A

II' (xo) 1= 1. other I-periodic if

of the

a 01 \037 +00,

has a unique

function,

that

3

functions,

I-periodic

I-periodic

stable.

at least

stable,

4.20.

_x

c(t) is a continuous is asymptotically

where +c(t), solution and

continuous

equation)

has

5

x = -x

has a unique

function,

4.18.

(4.14)

of solutions, but are answer is yes, but a cases are contained in

Exercises)

4.17.

Using

show

can

did not hold and there

uniqueness

If the

there must three I-periodic

(4.14))

t >

for

this

for

constants

d

= d(t),)

that o. However, the argument In fact, we saw in generalization.

is bounded

of Eq.

discussion

two

than

of period

functions

ones given in Example 4.17, one

solutions.

are hyperbolic, then there no more than complete

and

three

sometimes

were

1-

finite

Furthermore,

no more

+ 1)

d(t

c(t),

continuous

arbitrary

longer valid

for c

that

2.1

Section

c(t + 1) =

(4.14)

Eq.

be a

must

of Example 4.18:)

generalization

to the

every solution uniqueness

are

there are

that

prove

large the

where

case

1], there

i=

is very

(4.13)

the exercises.

see

isolated; to

+ c(t),)

where c(t) and d(t) similar

are

Eq.

In the

127)

Equations

exercises.

following

+ d(t)x

is, II'(xo)

[that

hyperbolic

because they even. It is possible

is

number

the

If the initial data for ble. the solution is decreasing.

of them

number

the

=

b

then

01 Periodic

Examples

0, xo) is called hyperbolic solutions are isolated from

corresponding

I-periodic

+ a(t)x

hyperbolic

continuous

- x 2)))

fixed

functions,

points

prove

128

Nonautonomous

Scalar

4:

Chapter

has at most Hint: Suppose

Equations)

solutions. is a solution and introduce the transforI-periodic cp(t) variable of the variable x == cp + y. Then in the new y, the Riccati

mation

equation

two

I-periodic

that

becomes)

-

iJ == c(t)y If we

l

two cases

4.21.

let w

further

==

c(t) dt

Jo

w == -c(t)w l == Jo c(t) dt

0 and

-

a(t)

+ 1.

then

y-l,

i=

==

c(t)

y2,)

0 using

2cp(t).)

the Now, discuss separately the Fredholm Alternative.

that the logistic In Example 4.19, we observed coefficients > 0 and x/k(t)] with I-periodic r(t) solution. Use the suggestion > 0 has as least one positive I-periodic k(t) below to establish that there is exactly one such solution. Hint: Suppose that solutions with I-periodic x(t) and x(t) are two positive x(t) - x(t) > 0 for all t E [0, 1]. Let v(t) == x(t) - x(t). Then show that) Periodic

Equation:

Logistic

equation x

v

==

==

-

r(t)x[l

< r(t)[l -

- x(t)] x(t)/k(t)

[x(t)

x(t)

r(t)

+ r(t)

-

[1

x(t)/k(t)]v

x(t)/k(t)]v)

and) 1

< v(O) exp

v(l) Since

4.22.

is a

x(t)

equal to

1 and

Generalized

< v(O),

v(l)

which

the

Consider

Logistic:

of the

solution

I-periodic

thus

-

r(s)(l

{1

x(s)/k(s))

equation, the

ds

.)

} term

exponential

is

contradiction.

is a

differential

x

equation

ecologically reasonable > 0 and all t, and M

==

x), where

xf(t,

1

in f following > 0 such that f(t, x) < 0 for t, decreasing in x for x x > M and all t. Prove that If x(O) > 0, then x(t) > 0 for all t. (a) l If is a unique positive I-periodic solution (b) Jo f(t, 0) dt > 0, then there to which any other solution with x(O) > 0 approaches. exercise. For further information, Hint: Use the suggestions in the previous see de Mottoni and Schiaffino [1981]. the

satisfies

4.23. Periodic Harvesting:

the

Consider

x =

logistic

[1 where

is a

h(t)

assume that r( t) ally die out.

Show that

As

there

h( t) > 0

so

that

rm

harvesting:)

function. I-periodic the harvested population

and k(t) are continuous, a I-periodic solution x(t), which

property)

, I-periodic

h(t)x,)

r(t)

usual, is

k(t) ]

with

0

Furthermore,

nonnegative,

continuous,

-

equation

-

r(t)x

conditions:

- hM rM

km

< x(t)


0

xo) of

the

this result one would to which is a difficult map object the solution of is available. To circumvent unless Eq. (4.4) compute general in this section we derive for the derivative a formula of the this difficulty, in of solution terms the and the vector Poincare only I-periodic map cp In doing so, we will also discover some other properties of field f (t, x). which are of independent differential interest. equations and

need

x)

If

4.20.

Lemma f(t,

It may

> 1. ifII'(xo) formula for an explicit

unstable

with

cp(O,

cp(t,

0, xo) =

initial-value

following

0,

0, xo))

cp(t,

(t,

differential

a linear

for

=

z(O)

z,)

equation:) (4.15

1,)

is,)

8cp

axo Proof.

then

Xo,

\037\037

that

solution of a i-periodic equation x = is the solution of the 8cp(t, 0, xo)/8xo

is the

xo)

problem

i =

appear

Poincare

the

The

solution

(t, 0, xo) = cp( t,

0, xo)

cp(t, 0, xo)

both sides

Differentiating

chain rule,

of

=

Xo

8 Xo

[ 10

ax

is given +

this

(s, cp(s, 0,

xo))ds ] .

( 4.16))

by)

I(s,

it equation

cp(s,

0,

xo))

with respect

ds.)

to

Xo,

and

using

yields)

t _8cp

{t 8 f

exp

(t, 0, xo) = 1 +

i

0

_8f 8x

(s,

cp(s,

0, xo))

_8cp

8Xo))) (s,

0,

xo) ds.

the

))

130

Nonautonomous

Scalar

4:

Chapter

Now, if we let

z(t)

differential

equation

have the

tion about

consider

if we

following:

==

is, x(t)

0,

cp(t, ==

z(t)

x

==

of the

term

f(t,

0,

cp(t,

the conclusion

Now,

equation

of the lemma

to

==

field

vector

this

of

{I

of

J0

ax

( 4.18))

cp(l, 0,

II(xo)

map,

_ocp

xo).)

(1, 0, xo).

from

follows

(t,

xo)) dt].

Xo yields

8 Xo

0 such that, for IAI < Ao, there dic solu tions \"pI (A, t) and \"p 2(A, x) which have the also that Show -ao/eo and 1P2(0, t) = - J -ao/eo. and \"p2 is are hyperbolic and that \"pI is unstable

I-periodic

JR. Show

JR x

E

Periodic

of Nonhyperbolic

Stability

equation

=

for

0, suppose these values

IAI

each

IAI small.

that there are three of c and d there are

small.

of these x = f(x)

is a unique the same values

0 there with

+

I-periodic Ag(t,

x),

solutions.

where

the function 9

I-periodic with Ig(t, x)1 < 1, and the function f satisfies f(x) = 0 with f' (x) i= 0 for some x. Show that there are constants c > 0 and solution Ao such that, for IAI < AO, the differential equation has a I-periodic show that this is the only I-periodic \"p(A, t) with 1P(0, t) = x. Moreover, within c of x. solution and some the Poincare Hint: Consider above, map. Use the first exercise continuous

is

results

from

and

Chapter

3.)

of Nonhyperbolic Periodic Solutions of a I-periodic seen in Example 4.25, if a I-periodic solution As we have the stability then differential equation type of the (4.4) is not hyperbolic, be determined from the linearization of the Poincare solution cannot map using Theorem 4.22. In this case, we need to compute the higher-order to the of the Poincare map at the fixed derivatives point corresponding how to do this of this section is to show solution. The purpose periodic solution. We first give the in terms of the vector field and the I-periodic of the statement of the main result, and then use it to determine stability the details of in Example solution 4.25. Finally, we present the I\037periodic for some time; however, the not appear The relief sign does the proof. 5.2.

Stability

important ideas such as transformation of variables. solution of Eq. (4.4) and consider cp(t, 0, xo) be a I-periodic about that 0, xo), is,) cp(t, z(t)

contains

proof

Let variation

x(t)

==

cp(t,

0, xo)

+ z(t).)

the

(5.2))))

135)

136

5:

Chapter

Then the

Equations)

of the

terms

several

first

have the

for z will

of Periodic

Bifurcations

variational

differential

(4.17)

equation

form)

z =

b(t)z +

c(t)z2 +

+

d(t)z3

(5.3))

O(z4),)

and the notation O(z4) deare coefficients functions, I-periodic that terms of order z4 and higher; see the Appendix. Notice of the neighborhood of the zero solution of Eq. (5.3) is equivathe study solution lent to the study of the neighborhood of the Now, I-periodic cpo = let us assume that cp is nonhyperbolic, that is, II' (0) 1, or equiva= O. is I-periodic Then the function y(t) lently fo1b(S)ds f\037b(s)ds where the the

notes

t+ 1

To wit, consider + 1) - y(t) = ft b(s) ds. Since the intey(t is invariant over a period of a periodic function under translation, gral t+ 1 = = is ds ds o. Thus, y(t) I-periodic. b(s) ft f01 b(s) in the variational In order to eliminate the linear term equation (5.3), the introduce by I-periodic change of variable u( t) defined in t.

z(t)

The differential

equation (5.3) it =

c(t) and d(t)

where

c(t) = With

this notation,

are

eJo'

we

The

second

2

+

b(s)ds

3

d(t)u

u

variable

new

+ O(u given

2 d(t) = e

will

have

the

(5.5))

),)

by b(s)ds

and

state

our main

theorem.

is a fixed

point of the Poincare equation (4.4). Then

xo

differential

at

the

fixed

point

form)

4

c(t)

of II

derivative

(5.4))

u(t).)

functions

I-periodic

now

ds

b(s)

the

for

c(t)u

Theorem 5.1. Suppose that with Il'(xo) = 1 of a l-periodic (i)

= eJo'

J\037'

d(t).

(5.6))

II

map

is given by

1 II\"

(xo)

c(t) dt

=

21

2co,

the l-periodic the fixed function c(t) is as in Eq. (5.6). Thus, the at solution Xo; hence, 0, xo) of point corresponding periodic cp(t, if is O. unstable Co =1= Eq. (4.4), If Co = 0, then the third derivative of Il at the fixed point Xo is given where

(ii)

by 1

II/\" (xo)

=

61

where d(t) is as in Eq. (5.6). Thus, periodic solution cp(t, corresponding do > 0 and asymptotically stable if

dt

d(t)

the 0, do

6d o,

fixed point at Xo, xo) of Eq. (4.4), is


o.

1

Thus, it

follows

from

solution

cp(t, 0,

1) =

Proof

of Theorem

equation successive

theorem

the cos

21ft

5.1. The

(5.3) to a transformation

differential

above that the nonhyperbolic 4.25 is unstable;

of Example key

idea equation

of variables.

of the

proof is to

with

In the

constant choice

reduce

I-periodic see

Figure the

5.1.

variational

coefficients by using of the

transformations,)))

137)

138

5:

Chapter

of Periodic

Bifurcations

however, care as to have

The transformations must in the transformed equation

taken.

be

must

t so

differential

the

Equations) be

I-periodic

in

variables

be

.

I-periodic.

of the

a consequence

As

ity of 'P, we have

assumption f01

f; b( s) ds is I-periodic.

that

shown

==

b( s )ds

0, the

nonhyperbolicthe

Therefore,

function

is I-periodic. Consequently, the (5.4) exp{f; b( s) ds} in the transformation functions c(t) and d(t) in Eq. (5.4) are also I-periodic. of the one final transformation Now, our objective is to determine with constant coa differential to variables to convert equation Eq. (5.5) The form of Eq. (5.5) suggests that we terms. efficients in the lower-order

transformation)

the

consider

==

u(t)

2

+ (3(t)w

w(t)

(t) +

,(t)w

3

(5.7))

(t),)

functions to and (3(t) and ,(t) are I-periodic where w(t) is the new variable in the formulae we will of notation, be determined. For simplicity below, A few calculations t if there is no danger of confusion. omit the variable for w is given by) show that the differential equation

2{3w +

tV == (1 +

3,W

makes

choice

we

fact, 1)

chose

the solutions ==

of

==

/3

only

are

c

==

0

if

+ f;

(constant)

+

d

function

==

+ O(w 4 )].)

2{3/3)w

3

+ O( w

form:)

4

).

(5.8))

differential

the

that

way

1, the


\" 8w

o

terms in the Taylor

Bo.

(0, 0) of

series

the

(5.21) Poincare

map is

by

n(A,

wo)

==

AOA

+ O(A

+

The ential

AD,

0)

following

equations-is

[co

2 +

) +

[1 +

consequence

+

2 O(A

)]WO (5.22))))

+ O(wg).

O(A)]w6

theorem-saddle-node

an easy

\037BOA

bifurcation of

the

remarks

for I-periodic in Section

differ-

5.1.)

141)

142

5:

Chapter

Bifurcations

5.3.

Theorem ential

of Periodic

Equations)

that

=1= O.

Suppose

AoCo

equation

(i) no l-periodic solution if AAoco (ii) one l-periodic solution if AAoco (iii) two l-periodic solutions if AAoCo

turn to

We now calculating

>

near

A

the

zero,

differ-

In

0; =

0; O.


0, xO center-with E IR? the))) find a IIbifurcation one to IleAtxO IIxo II (9.1)))) attempts point-an organizing

8.1. Properties Definition 8.2.

and x 2 (t) of Eq. (8.2) are said xl(t) I for t each E if, independent IR, the relation C1 x (t) + C2X2 (t) that Cl == 0 and C2 == O.

linearly

implies

solutions

Two

of xl (t) and x 2 2 x 2 matrix whose

Linear independence of the determinant

the

is equivalent to consist

(t)

columns

the

fact

to

be

==

0

that

two

of these

is nonzero:)

vectors

det (x

of

I

2

Ix

( t)

to manipulate a

order

In

bit

of Linear Systems

of Solutions

( t ))

of

pair

all t

for

\037 0)

solutions

E

IR.)

effectively

(8.3))

we introduce a

terminology.

and x 2 (t)

two solutions of Eq. (8.2), then the whose columns are the two solutions (t)), of Eq. =1= 0 for all (8.2). If, in addition, det X(t) t E JR, then X(t) is said to be a fundamental matrix solution of Eq. (8.2). == A special fundamental matrix solution satisfying the condition I, X(O) where I is the 2 x 2 identity matrix, is called a principal matrix solution. 8.3.

Definition

Ifxl(t)

matrix X(t) (Xl(t) is called a matrix solution 2 x 2

I x

are

2

a lemma which provides the useful fact that it suffices at only one value of t, and gives an explicit formula the flow of Eq. (8.2) in terms of any fundamental matrix solution. state

now

We

to

check

det X(t)

Lemma 8.4. Properties of fundamental solutions: of Eq. (i) If X(t) is a matrix solution (8.2) with det X(O) det X( t) \037 0 for all t E IR, that is, X( t) is a fundamental of Eq. (8.2). (ii) IfX(t) is a fundamental the

satisfying

matrix

cp(t,

==

xO)

then

solution,

condition x(O)

initial

X(

== XO

-1

then

solution

the solution of Eq.

is given

t) [X(O)]

\037 0,

for

(8.2)

by)

xO.)

(8.4))

of the initial-value problem x(O) == (i) First observe that the solution == o. is zero: that there Now, Eq. (8.2) identically suppose c.p(t, 0) == are T constants and such that where + Cl, C2, 0, CIXI(T) C2x2(T) xl(t) and x 2 (t) are the columns of X(t). Then, CIXI(t + T) + C2X2(t + T) is also a solution for Eq. (8.2), which for t == 0 is zero. Therefore, by uniqueness

Proof. for

o

of

we have)

solutions,

cp ( t,

Thus,

if we

take t

==

0)

-T,

==

then

o == cp( -T,

Now, the Cl

linear

== C2 == O.)))

independence

Cl X

I

we 0)

(t + T) +

C2X2

(t + T).)

obtain)

==

of the

C1XI(0)

+ C2X2(0).)

vectors xl(O) and

x 2 (0)

implies

that

219)

220

Linear

8:

Chapter

(ii) The

cause it

right-hand

X(O) X(O)-l = I,

it is

is a solution of Eq. (8.2) besolutions x 1(O) and x 2 (O). Since initial condition. Thus, from the

(8.4)

Eq.

of the the

satisfies

also

it

theorem,

uniqueness

of

side

combination

linear

a

is

Systems)

the solution. 0

The of superposition principle implies that the set of all solutions The lemma above shows that the dimension Eq. (8.2) is a vector space. of this vector space is two. After some general facts about the discovering we will the flows of linear determine bases for vector explicit space systems, of solutions of Eq. (8.2) for any given coefficient matrix A. in the first we saw As of our book, the flow of the scalar example linear differential equation x = ax is given by the exponential function = eatxo. To obtain an analogous formula for the flow of linear c.p(t, xo)

planar systems we

-

eAt where for

the

X(t) is any fundamental flow of Eq. (8.2)

the

hence establishing

notation)

the

introduce

be

written

c.p(t,

Xo)

desired

and thus eAt

8.5.

Lemma

(8.6))

Of course,)

AO

the reason

eAt and provide

solution

The

=

for

I,)

choice

this

(8.2). of the principal of notation.

eAt satisfies

solution

matrix

principal

Eq. (8.4)

= eAtxO,)

is a principal matrix solution of Eq. collect several important properties

now

We

ofEq.

as the

analogy.

e

(8.2). Then, matrix exponential)

solution

matrix

can

(8.5))

X(t)X(O)-I,)

matrix

the

following

properties:

(i)

= eAt e As

eA(t+s) -1

(ii) (iii)

= e-

(eAt) :t eAt

( iv ) eAt

= (i)

Proof.

= Ae

For Eq.

implies the

desired

Take

(iii) The

;

=

(8.2).)))

n =

fixed s,

s =

2 2 I + At + l.A 2!. t + ...

the

which

(8.2)

matrices

coincide at t

eA(t+s)

=

o.

and The

eAt e As

are matrix

uniqueness

theorem

equality.

-t

first

Eq. (8.5). The second rem with the observation of Eq.

eAt A;

lAnt n!

any

solutions of (ii)

At

At

\",+00 L....in=O

;

in

property

equality one

(i). follows from

is again that both

the definition a consequence of the Ae At and eAt A are

of

eAt

uniqueness matrix

given

in

theosol\037tions

8.1. Properties (iv) This ones

previous matical

more

is considerably

property

a complete

and

difficult to establish than the a certain amount of mathe-

present the

we will

Here,

sophistication.

requires

proof

of Linear Systems

of Solutions

essential

steps

to make

it

convIncIng.

We should

that it is possible to take property (iv) as the defithat one establishes the of this matrix provided convergence all series. one can demonstrate the other of eAt power Then, properties that eAt the matrix solution of the result is principal Eq. including (8.2). we will establish the however, Following our presentation in this chapter, for its power series expansion from the fact that eAt is the principal formula matrix solution of Eq. (8.2). eAt. observe For the sake of brevity of notation, let us set P(t) Now, the that for each vector XO E JR, the matrix P (t) satisfies equation integral remark

of eAt

nition

P(t)xO = Since P(t) iteratively

Ixo +

it

ds.)

AP(s)xO

(8.7))

appears on both sides of this equation, we attempt to find P(t) If we take as our initial by using successive approximations.

guess) ==

p(O)(t)XO

and

compute

the successive iterates = Ixo

p(kH)(t)XO

as the

then

kth

for

iterate,

k

==

Ixo,)

with)

+

(s)X

it

1, 2, . .

0,

O

AP(k)

., we obtain

ds,)

(8.8))

the

ex-

polynomial

preSSIon)

p(k)(t)xO

1

+ AxOt

== Ixo

+ ,A2xOt 2.

2

1 +...

+

k ,.)

AkxOt

k

.

of vectors given by this p(k)(t)xO first observation is that it suffices to +00. converges of p(k)(t)xO for all XO on the unit circle 8 1 show the convergence {x : == in as can be written a scalar because vector JR2 multiple any II xII I} only, 1 to the is realization a study of point the fact that,thatsince of some vector on 8 . The second observation IIAxol1 will not beand trivial. difficulties associequilibria nonhyperbolic XO a closed thebounded is continuous 8 1 isDespite as a function of set, there with ated role them, however, equilibria playa prominent Q > 0 suchnonhyperbolic that) exists a constant in our subject, as we shall soon see.) 1 for all xO E 8 .) < Q) IIAxOl1 We

now

show

that

as k

formula

Exercises)

the

---+

sequence

The

.t.Q.)

it is now easy to establish the estimates following of the following scalar 1.8. Many examples: Determine the equilibrium points p(k) (t)xo: on the norms of the iterates differential and compute the linear variational about equations equations the equilibria. 1 2 2equilibria 1 the hyperbolic and their Identify stability types. k < 1 + at + eat))) a t + . .also. + akt

for

then there

O.)

in the next section.

apparent

initial-value merical algorithms for solving For example, try to solve the Euler, Runge-Kutta, and various Improved

equations.

parts,

x E ]R?,)

all

I/xll)

system: Since the exact serve down, they often

real

negative

at

become

will

A have that, for

of linear systems can grounds for various nuproblems for ordinary differential linear system using Euler, following solutions

as testing

sizes:)

step 1998.0

-1999.0 )

Compute the eigenvalues explicit solutions; compare

x.)

and

the

your

theoretical

eigenvectors findings

of the with

systhe)))

8.3. numerical

ones.

mathematical

esting things such a behavior and wait, or step

size

ear

system

more

drastic

really have a precise are doing inter-

time

scale.

small\"

To

capture

size, and vary the the eigenvalues of the linon this linear system, see \"very

changes

of

information

Systems

solutions

as on a long, must use either a

places where the How do the magnitudes

above compare? For et al. [1977], p. 124.)

not

well

one

the

accordingly.

Forsythe

short, as

numerically, detect

term stiff does means that the

way, the it usually

the

By

definition; on a very

in Linear

Equivalence

Qualitative

step

are

in Linear Systems Equivalence The of this section is to investigate the question of qualitative purpose of planar linear in the spirit of Section 2.6. Let equivalence systems of qualitative equivalence. begin with a precise definition of the notion 8.3.

Qualitative

us

linear systems i = Ax and i = Bx are said if there is a homeomorphism h : IR 2 \037 IR 2 equivalent topologically of the plane, that is, h is continuous with continuous inverse, that maps the orbits ofi = Bx and preserves the sense of the orbits ofi = Ax onto

Definition 8.13. to

direction of Since

convenient by

Two

planar

be

time.)

have a formula to recast this definition

we

one flow to

mapping

for

the other, h(eAtx)

flows

the in that

of planar

a somewhat

linear systems,

more quantitative

it

is

form

is,)

= eBth(x))

(8.20 ))

for every t E IR and x E ]R2. A homeomorphism h satisfying Eq. (8.20) in Definition 8.13; while than it the one required is a bit more special orbits onto orbits, it also preserves the time parametrizations of the maps orbits. However, as we shall shortly see, in the case A and B are hyperbolic, nonzero real parts, the homeomorphism h in chosen to satisfy Eq. (8.20). of linear is a someThe question of topological equivalence systems to motivate the introduction of the formal what difficult one. Therefore, let us first reexamine the redefinition of qualitative equivalence above, of transforming matrices into sults of the previous section. In the course their Jordan Normal Forms we have investigated the question of topological in a limited context by considering linear maps only invertible equivalence and In as our allowable fact, Eqs. (8.9) homeomorphisms. imply (8.11) A = P-1BP, that if there is an invertible 2 x 2 matrix P such that then the flows of i = A x and i = B x are related by PeAt = eBtp. In other if matrices A and B are similar, also called conjugate, then the flows words, i = B x are the))) of i = A x and It is easy to verify linearly equivalent.

that

is, their

Definition

eigenvalues

8.13

have

can indeed be

237)

238

Linear

8:

Chapter

Systems)

converse implication by simply and then evaluating it at t = o.

the

differentiating

= eBtp

PeAt

equation

is a bit too restrictive for comparing Unfortunately, linear equivalence features of flows of linear For the two qualitative example, systems. x = - 2 I should be linear systems x = - I and considered qualitatively this follows from the fact equivalent equivalent; yet they are not linearly that the matrices -land - 21 are not similar because they have different as shown in the exercises. eigenvalues, the differenone may naturally ponder After about linear equivalence, A tiable equivalence of linear For two matrices and B, does systems: given there a diffeomorphism h : IR 2 \037 IR 2 satisfying h(eAtx) = eBth(x)? exist In the case of hyperbolic linear systems, differentiable equivalence offers

the

as the

new,

nothing

8.14. Two

Lemma

Linear

Proof.

we

therefore,

linear

hyperbolic

equivalence,

of

converse

Ax and x = Bx

are

equivalent.)

linearly

differentiable

implies

course,

to show the

need

x =

systems

only if they are

if and

equivalent

differentiably

attests:)

lemma

simple

following

Suppose

implication.

equivalence; ........ that h :

2

is a diffeomorphism satisfying Let h(O) = c. Since Eq. (8.20). c is an equilibrium that equilibrium point of x = Ax, it follows the diffeomorphism of JR? point of x = Bx, that is, Bc = o. Now, consider of the shift g(x) \037 x-c. takes orbits The diffeomorphism consisting 9 ........ of x == Bx into itself, and the diffeomorphism h = 9 0 h takes orbits of x = Ax to the orbits x = Bx that while leaving the origin fixed, is, h satisfies Eq. (8.20) and h(O) = o. with to xO and set xO = 0, Now, if we differentiate Eq. (8.20) respect we obtain HeAt = eBt H, where H = Dxh(O) which is a linear map. If we to t and set t = 0, then HA = BH. differentiate with respect )

IR 2

o

\037 IR

is an

It

but

is evident

face

the

difficult

from the foregoing task of deciding

systems using homeomorphisms Let us now state two theorems lengths,

systems and discuss we will defer the proofs

theorem

covering the

nar

linear

Theorem have

nonzero

8.15. real

hyperbolic

of

equivalence

qualitative

choice

of linear

plane.

topological classification of plaimplications. Because of their end of the section. Here is the first

on the

of their

some to

the

linear

Suppose that the Then the

parts.

the

we have no

that

discussion

the

systems.) eigenvalues

two

linear

of two systems

A and B Ax and x = Bx

matrices

x =

if and only if A and B have the same number equivalent topologically of eigenvalues with negative (and hence positive) real parts. Consequently, there are three distinct equivalence classes up to topological equivalence, of hyperbolic linear the following repreplanar systems with, for example, are

sentatives:)))

8.3. two

(i) (ii)

books

elementary of

equivalence

and one negative

positive

(\037 \0371):

In

eigenvalues;

positive

one

(iii)

ear

two

(\037 \037):

Systems

eigenvalues;

negative

\0371):

(\0371

in Linear

Equivalence

Qualitative

on differential linear

hyperbolic

eigenvalue.

equations, most

often

only

is considered and a

systems

the lin-

host

of

are introduced to label improper node, spiral, etc., various see Figure 8.4. From the topological phase portraits; viewpoint, there ar\037' only three cases and they are determined however, solely by the in the theorem above. signs of the real parts of the eigenvalues, as asserted Notice in particular the striking assertion that a stable spiral and a stable node are topologically equivalent. Consequently, it is preferable to emthe whose ploy following terminology appropriateness will become apparent when we study the qualitative features of nonlinear differential equations near an equilibrium: A linear system whose have negative real eigenvalues is a called a linear whose have parts sink; hyperbolic system eigenvalues

as node,

such

terms,

a hyperbolic positive real parts is called and the other is the negative positive

and, when one system is said to be

source; linear

is

eigenvalue

a hyperbolic

saddle.

We next

the

present

of nonhyperbolic

classification

topological

linear

systems.

If a coefficient then the planar

8.16.

Theorem zero

real

part,

equivalent to precisely indicated coefficient

matrices:

zero

matrix;

( i)

(ii) (iii) (iv)

(v)

(\037\037):

(\0371

\037):

(\037\037):

(g

the

\037):

one

negative

one

positive

two

zero

two (\0371

one

\037):

of

linear

the

and one and one

eigenvalues

purely

imaginary

x

system

following

zero

zero

at least one

A has

matrix

five

==

linear

eigenvalue

with

is topologically with the systems

A x

eigenvalue;

eigenvalue;

but one

eigenvector;

eigenvalues.

Phase portraits of the representatives and of the three hyperbolic the linear systems are depicted in Figure 8.5. From a visual inspection of phase portraits of linear systems, the conclusions of the two theorems above are quite plausible, yet formal proofs turn out to be somewhat long and intricate. We now this arduous begin will which our attention the of this task, occupy part during remaining with some results on forms. section, auxiliary quadratic A real symmetric matrix C, that is, C T == C where the superscript T denotes the is said to be positive if the quadratic form))) transpose, definite five nonhyperbolic

239)

240

Linear

8:

Chapter

Systems)

about the

Information

Stewart the

subject

erence Milnor

and

[1963]. of

application

is a de

case

not

continuum

Melo

[1982].

are not isolated single point; see, for Henry

further

for

[1983]

for our purposes

Theorem

ref-

standard

of Sard

Theorem

is on

is

given

details. 37

page

in

A of

elements it is possible

of the set that

of

the

of equilibria; such an example are several applications and yet the w-limit set

is

There

Aulbach

example,

of a gradient set of a bounded on page 14 of Palis

equilibria

w-limit

where of

a

the

bounded

[1984], Hale and

equilibrium orbit is

Massatt

a

[1982],

[1981].

Gradient catastrophe

the

where

isolated,

points and

Sard's

the

and

Appendix

of the

statement

The

points

role throughout this chapof a real-valued function

[1963].

In the system are orbit

played

a prominent

consult Milnor [1965] or Smith

the Appendix; Milnor

@)'@)

functions

of

in

gradient.)

study of nondegenerate critical of Morse see the Theory;

A deep

relevant

name

umbilic is stored

elliptic

Notes)

Critical points is the

under the

of the

field

in Poston and

is contained

umbilic

elliptic

vector

gradient

of PHASER

library

Bibliographical

ter.

The

[1978].

systems have theory; Zeeman

see, [1977]. for

diverse

example,

uses.

play They Thorn [1969],

an important Poston and

role

in

Stewart

in Morse In differential topology, especially to anone flows vector fields to take one manifold along gradient theory, as in are in described Milnor Similar ideas used Smale other, [1963]. [1961 in higher In and to affirm the Poincare conjecture dimensions. 1961a] numerical analysis, computing methods under the names \"conjugate graor descent\" essentially consist of flowing dient\" \"steepest along gradient vector fields; see, for example, Conte and deBoor [1972]. Because of the an equilibrium, fact that bounded solutions approach computations yield convergent results. The of a vibrating membrane is studied in Chow, Hale, and example Mallet-Paret is for reaction-diffusion equations [1976]. A good reference Fife [1979]. It is evident that the dynamics of a gradient are essentially system determined by the equilibria and the possible orbits between connecting of This observation can be made and equilibria. precise practical any pair combinatorics. the vertices of a graph One associates by resorting to simple with equilibria and the edges with orbits. Such graphs are used connecting 8.4. All linear whose have all two-dimensional to Peixoto in as explained Figure systems eigenvalues negativeby real (a) gradient flows, classify Hale Peixoto [1973] andtopologically parts-sinks-are equivalent (continued).))) [1977]. It is not possible to characterize all structurally stable systems in dithan two. However, there is a nice result in Smale [1961]))) mensions greater [1978],

and

8.3.

Figure 8.4 Continued. x

T Cx

> 0

for

all

x

(b)

=1= o.

form on

definite

An

saddles

Linear

important

the

k >

any

geometric property of a positive the level set { x : x T Cx = k }, In the lemma below, we origin. with

forms

of

additional

properties

8.15.

Theorem

there

then

a positive

exists Proof.

Without

loss

Normal

Form

Jordan

Case

equivalent.)

topologically

of A have negative real parts, 8.17. If the eigenvalues definite matrix e such that ATe + CA = -I.

Lemma

Case

are

Systems

is that

quadratic plane the 0, is an ellipse encircling establish the existence of some quadratic which will playa role in the proof crucial for

in Linear

Equivalence

Qualitative

(i):

(ii):

A =

(-;'

A = (::::\037

of generality, we may assume and consider three cases: Al -\0372)'

!a)'

0: >

> 0,

A2

0, and

>

O. Take

that

the

f:. O. Take

is in

C = (l/(\037A.)

(3

A

matrix

C =

1/(20:)

l/(\037A2\302\273)'

I.)))

241)

242

8:

Chapter

Linear

Systems)

x2

X

X

2

2

\037

,J

x,

X,

x,

(

\\ -1)0)

(-1 o

x

. . . .

(\037

(\037

-

-

..

.... . . ...

. . .

x 2)

x 2)

2)

.

-)

g))

(-6

(\037

. -

\037 ..

- - - ..

\037

(g

\037))

x 2)

x 2)

-- -

x,

x,

..)

6))

8.5. Phase portraits of classes of planar linear systems.)))

Figure

-

-

..

-

x,

x,

\037))

-

-\037)

(\037

\037)

(-\037

representatives

6))

of topological

equivalence

x

8.3. Case (iii): A =

1/(2A)

c > 0,

any

-1

A TD + DA

c/(2A)

==

-1) )

( cj(2A))

x

\037

l / 2x.

E-

If we

(\037 \037 )x.

A =

let D

=

-E.

introduce the change l / 2 DE- l / 2 possesses

0 and

>

E-

matrix

C

first

main

the proof of our

turn

now

of

co-

the

result

of the

section.

Let us first observe 8.15. that the conditions on the A and B are necessary for topological For equivalence. if a homeomorphism is not difficult to persuade oneself that

Theorem

of

Proof

that

0

properties.

We

1 - [c/(2A)]2 Then the

that

c so

choose

ordinates

desired

I--->

Systems

then)

I,

Now,

x

assume

can

we

of coordinates

transformation

the

by

\037>.)

(-0>'

For (\037O>' \037\\).

in Linear

Equivalence

Qualitative

matrices

coefficient

this purpose, takes a bounded

it

A x to a bounded positive orbit the w-limit set of one the homeomorphism also takes orbit to that of the other. A similar remark holds for a-limit sets positive of bounded orbits also. Consequently, if A has both eigenvalues negative real and A is topologically equivalent to B, then with negative parts every of x == B x approaches zero as t ----* +00. solution both eigenvalues Thus, of B must have negative real parts. A similar argument holds, as t ----* -00, If A if both eigenvalues of A have has one real and positive parts. positive of

==

x

must eigenvalue, then there zero as t ----* approaches

as t

zero

approaches

one

that

B x

==

x

==

then

B x,

one negative of

of x

orbit

positive

----* -00.

one nonequilibrium solution and another solution that

be +00

B must

Consequently,

have one negative and

eigenvalue.

positive

To prove

sufficiency, let us

begin

with

Case

(iii)

as it is the simplest. B have one linear change

we may assume that if A and section, previous and one positive eigenvalue, then they can be put, by negative of coordinates, into the following Jordan Normal Forms:) the

From

Ai > 0

each

linear

scalar

and

differential

J-li

topologically

ilarly, the

scalar

B==

(

\0372) >

O.

Now,

J-ll

o)

,)

:2)

from Section 2.6

recall

that

the

two

: JR ----* JR.

Sim-

equations) ==

Xl

are

,)

o)

( where

-

-AI

A==

equivalent

-AlXl,)

with some

Xl

==

-

J-ll Xl)

homeomorphismhI

equations)

X2 == A2 X 2,)

X2

==

J-l2 X 2)))

243)

244

Linear

8:

Chapter

Systems)

are topologically equivalent via a homeomorphism h2 : of the planar linear x = A x and x = B x are systems with the equivalent homeomorphism) h : JR2 ---+ JR2;

h(x)

= (hI

JR

The

---+ JR.

then

flows

topologically

(Xl), h2 (X2)).)

and construct homeomorphisms to establish of planar linear whose have systems eigenvalues t Case negative real parts. replacing (ii) follows from Case (i) by simply but the with -to The construction below a bit technical, may appear idea behind it is quite simple. For each linear system, find an geometric the that the such each orbit, equilibrium ellipse encircling origin except the ellipse in the same direction and only at one crosses point at the origin, and point. Now, map homeomorphic ally one ellipse to the other, map an orbit through a point on the first ellipse to the orbit passing through the on the second ellipse. extend such a homeomorphism point image Finally, to include the This idea is reminiscent of polar where coordinates origin. the ellipse is the \"angular variable\" and the orbits are the \"radial variable.\" To prove the existence of two ellipses with the desired properties mentioned some ideas from the theory of \"Liabove, we use Lemma 8.17 and functions.\" We will delve into the topic of Liapunov functions in apunov 9. Here, we will be content to point out that if the derivative of a Chapter

now turn

We

the

to

Case

(i)

equivalence

topological

of a linear positive definite quadratic function along the solutions system x = A x is negative, at the then the orbits cross the elliptical except origin, level sets inward. There exist two positive definite symmetric matrices CA and C B such that)

+ CAA

ATCA

Let x( t)

be

d

dt [xT

a solution

(t) C A

x(t)]

of x

= -I,)

= A x,

= xT (t)

BTC B

+

[A TCA + CAA] x(t)

=

_x

T

(t) x(t).)

A x crosses the level sets that any nonequilibrium x T CBx inward see also;

8.6.

a homeomorphism h : JR2 = A x to the orbits of x = B x. Let T I} ---+ {x : x CBx = I} be a given homeomorphism For any xO i= 0, there is a unique time txo such that xl = 1. Now, define the ellipse XTCAx h(xO) = eBtxOh(xl); continuous It is evident, from of solutions dependence in fact, it is a diffeomorphism h is a homeomorphism;

It is

takes

= -I.)

then)

Therefore, any nonequilibrium solution x( t) of x = A similar of x T C AX inward. computation shows solution x( t) of x = B x crosses level sets of the Figure

CBB

the

now

easy

orbits

a diffeomorphism.)))

to define

of x

- 0

---+ JR2

- 0

that

= of the two ellipses. e-AtxoxO lies on Ii : {x

see

: XTCAX

Figure

8.7.

on -.initial data, that if h is chosen to be

8.3.

in Linear

Equivalence

Qualitative

x 2)

Systems

x 2)

x 1)

x 1)

x =

x = Ax)

8.6.

Figure

linear

ative

quadratic

Orbits of

a planar

parts cross the function, ellipses,

linear

system of an

curves

level

Bx)

whose eigenvalues have negdefinite appropriate positive

inward.)

h(x 1 ))

Figure

nar

a

8.7. Constructjng linear systems whose

eigenvalues

have

negative

real

8}. Since

Then

extend

there

the set

is to T {x : x

==

with

to(8)

CBx

==

I}

txo > to, is bounded

two

pla-

parts.)

the domain of the homeomorphism h above to show that h is continuous we define h(O) == O. It remains xO E and consider purpose, suppose that 0 < 8 < 1 is given To

of

the flows

between

homeomorphism

to at

of R 2 , o. For this all

{x : XTCAx < and t o (8) ---+ +00 as 8 ---+ O. by a positive constant, say,)))

245)

246

Linear

8:

Chapter

M, and

Systems)
0 and

some

a, it

k and

constants

positive

that)

follows

Ilh(xO)11

< ke- ato

= IleBtxOh(e-AtxoxO)II

(6)M.)

so long as is 8 > 0 such that Ilh(xO)1I for any \342\202\254 < \342\202\254 > 0, there is norm equivalent to the Euclidean norm, (xO)TCAXO < 8. Since XTCAx h h is continuous at the origin. As we saw in an example above, however, a diffeomorphism at the origin. ) /\302\273){).,

!::,i!\"!!:::f::!:':!! .\".\" \". ...................) ...................... . ....................... ....................... ...............)

.:.:::.:.:.::::::::::::.:....... \" ,) \0370\037jliillli)

Poincare map

8.11.

Figure

The behavior of of the iterates of the

of Eq.

solutions

C : ill?

(8.32),

see

you

linear will

Poincare

undertake a detailed

that

its stability

generalized to

are easily

the

dynamics

map) xO

\037 C

of the

map

of planar

study

ones, in Chapter 15. For find the few remarks below

and

point

xO

ill?;)

in

reflected

,)

linear system

I-periodic

8.11.

Figure

We will the

as the

be viewed

should

which

\037

(8.32) are linear

two-dimensional

linear system.)

a l-periodic

of

have

we planar

the

moment,

acceptable.

developed This maps.

maps, including, of course, however, we trust that The notions of a fixed

3 for

in Chapter essentially

scalar

maps

entails replacing in several norms, Definitions 4.9 and

scalar with and absolute values with quantities vectors, definitions in Chapter 3. With similar replacements, of stability, 4.10 are also readily generalized to yield definitions asymptotic of the I-periodic system (8.32). stability, and instability of a solution A periodic to a fixed point of the solution of Eq. (8.32) corresponds linear and the of the planar map periodic solution of stability type (8.34), is of the fixed the same as the point Eq. (8.32) stability type corresponding in particular of the map (8.34). Notice that the zero solution of Eq. (8.32) to the fixed the of C at the origin. We now summarize point corresponds main implications of these remarks for the zero solution of Eq. (8.32).

Lemma in Eq. (i)

If

Let Then (8.33). 8.22.

IJ.-lil

1, for i


0 such that) Ilg(y)

Returning

to the

II


0energy f is topologis a neighborhood ofx in which then there point ofx satisfied. from of the in Theorem the estimate invariant (9.1) curves. of more 9.3, we have) integrationThen, to the linear vector field x = Df(x)x. () ically equivalent numerical evidence above, the important question Despite the strong t have a first inof point Henon-Heiles Does the Hamiltonian remains: still of the Because of the hyperbolicity x, the homeomorequilibrium (18.4) < Ke-atllyOIl + ds,))) Ke-a(t-s)mlly(s)11 The answer))) h abovethat can isbeIly(t)1I chosen so as independent to preserve parametrization))) phism tegral functionally l alsofrom thethetimeHamiltonian? yet)

+

l

9.1. Asymptotic as long as Ily( s) II inequality with eat

eat

II


(J.L2 - 4m )y\037 > o. origin. In the region in Suppose that yO E n n U. Then the solution through yO remains n as long as y(t) E U. To finish the proof, we observe that the solution V

( C1)

if C2

let

norm has for some value of t, that is, the solution equal to \342\202\254 hit the boundary of U. This follows because there is 6 > 0 such that The of the instability of the proof V(y) > 6 if y E U and V(y) > V(yO). is now complete. 0 equilibrium point of Eq. (9.12) at the origin

through yO must

Example 9.8. bility

type

of the

The

damped

continued:

pendulum

equilibrium points

(n7r,

0)

of Eq.

the n is an

Let us consider (9.8) when

staodd)))

274

Near

9:

Chapter

Equilibria)

Y2)

C, >

C2 >

=

Y2

0)

-Y,)

Y,)

and the

oEV

sets

level

n

region

of Eq. (9.8) at these

linearization

The

integer.

The

9.3.

Figure

where

V(y) >

points

equilibrium

o.)

is the

linear system)

( The

ejgenvalues

of this

linear

J.11,2

one

Since

Theorem

1

0

x. =

w

2

system

= -a:i:

is positive (and eigenvalue 9.7 that these equilibrium

_ 2a can

easily

2 v a

the

x.)

+w

other

points

(9.13))

)

are

be found to

be)

2 .)

is negative),

it

follows

frorn

unstable.

of the we have plotted in Figure 9.4 the phase portraits these unstable one of nonlinear system (9.8) and its linearization near (9.13) is a saddle. Furthermore, equilibrium points. Of course, the linear system is the nonlinear looks much like a saddle also, and the linearization system of the nonlinear near a good reflection of the local phase portrait system of the The preservation of a saddle under small equilibrium. perturbations a linear is true in general and we will explore this fact further in system For comparison,

Section

9.5.

0)

equilibrium point of a nonlinear system cannot linearization. It is evident from Theorems 9.5 always the of such and 9.7 that a situation can occur only if some eigenvalue has linearization has zero real part (and the remaining eigenvalue negative we must examine nonlinear real part). In this case, effects of the specific \\ve terms of the vector field to determine the local dynamics. Indeed, in the saddle-node))) encountered an instance of this difficulty have already

The stability be

determined

type

of

an

from

9.2.

275)

Linearization

from

Instability

/

/')

its

Local phase portraits of the damped near one of the unstable equilibria.)

9.4.

Figure

linearization

bifurcation

9.9.

Example

When

X2

+

X2 = -Xl

of

the

A is

a scalar

harmonic

linear terms. For

was present.

eigenvalue

suffice:

the

Consider

system

equations)

Xl =

where

and

pendulum

eigenvalues:)

does not

linearization

differential

zero

one

where

with purely imaginary

example

of nonlinear

7.23

in Example

given

is an

Here

nonlinear

parameter.

oscillator all

values

AXI (XI

+

These

x\037)

(9.14)) +

AX2(xI

equations

(7.4) but the of A,

+

x\037),)

are a nonlinear does

perturbation

the origin is an

equilibrium

perturbation

not point

affect

the

and

the)))

276

Near

9:

Chapter

linearized

Equilibria)

equation at

the

is, of

origin

course, the harmonic

0

. x =

oscillator)

1

_lOx.))

(

(9.15))

linear system are :f:i, which have zero real parts. we compute of the nonlinear system (9.14), analyze of a solution from the the derivative of the square of the distance origin:) The

eigenvalues

of this

To

the

behavior

d

dt ,\\ < 0, then Ilx(t)112 the equilibrium at the then all solutions of Eq. in this case, Therefore,

If

2

2 =

+

(Xl

2 2 2 ( xl + X2 )

.)

zero

monotonically stable. asymptotically

approaches is

origin

2,\\

X2 )

initial data

with

(9.14)

the origin is unstable.

xO

i=

as t

--+

+00.

'-'Q.o)

9.5. Equilibrium

Consider the

Pol:

der

Van

of

oscillator)

= X2 -

Xl

X2 =

where

A

is a

the

Show that

f(x)

(c) f(x)

Xl))

type

of the

that

the

as a

differential

only equilibrium

function equations

of

point

is at

A.

whose

vector

fields

Xl

=

(

)

+ 5X2

5Xl

+

XI;2 + X2 - X2)

;

)

eXl +X2 - 1

=

.) sin(xl

all equilibrium and determine their - XlX2, (a) Xl = 1 = 2Xl - xI (b) Xl

Find

;

(Xl :22x\037

( 9.7.

der Pol's

below is unstable:

given

(a) f(x) =

(b)

Show

stability

solution

zero

A(xr/3 -

of Van

form

Lienard

-Xl,)

scalar parameter.

Determine its

the origin.

are

0,

0)

Exercises)

9.6.

Thus,

However, if ,\\ > 0 escape to infinity.

+ X2) points stability

X2 = XlX2,

) of the

following systems

of

differential

equations

properties:

Xl -

x\037;

X2 =

-X2 +

XlX2;

(c)Y+iJ+y3=O; Xl = sin(xl + X2), X2 = e 1; = = Xl X2 2X2 - x\037 - x2xf. x\037 XlX\037, (e) Xl of the first three equations. Make sure portraits Try to sketch the phase at each equilibrium to use the information about the linearized equations

(d) Xl

point.)))

9.3.

277)

Functions

Liapunov

9.8. If the origin is a stable but not asymptotically stable equilibrium the planar system x == f(x), can the origin be a saddle point of the

point

of

linearized

equations?)

9.9.

Feedback control:

for the pendulum of length l, mass of the proportional to the velocity in the pendulum pendulum. Suppose now that the objective is to stabilize the vertical position mechanism its a control which can (above pivot) by move the pivot of the pendulum horizontally. Let us assume that f) is the in the clockwise measured direction and th.e angle from the vertical position to linear force v due the control mechanism is a function of f) and f), restoring that is, v(O, 0) == Clf) + c 2 0. Convince yourself that the differential equation)

m, in a

.

..

0+

0) asymptotically

(0,

equation

friction

\"Pole\" placement:

9 sin 0 1:

-

such

of

in such a

be chosen

C2 can

9.10.

mf)

the motion

describes

the

with

Consider

medium

viscous

way

.

1

-

+ C2f))

1:(Clf)

a pendulum. Show so as to make the

cos

f) == 0)

that the

Cl and

constants

point

equilibrium

(f), 9)

==

stable.)

In the

the

above,

problem

linearized

equations had the

form)

x == Ax

+

by,)

b=(\037),)

and

the problem was

the eigenvalues If the

Theorem: is

matrix

matrix

controllable,

A + beT

have

Hint: There

9.3.

the

T

x == ClXl + C2X2 so that A + beT have negative real parts. Prove the

by

choosing

v

==

e

result:

following

above

of

solved

is

negative a vector

(b

then

is nonsingular, that is, the linear system I Ab) there is a vector e such that the eigenvalues of

real parts. e with tr (A

+ beT)

< 0

and det(A

+ beT) >

o.)

Functions

Liapunov

x of a planar system x = For an asymptotically stable equilibrium point estimates it is of considerable practical importance to obtain good f(x), of the the subset of ]R2 of the basin attraction of that x, is, consisting of initial data XO with the property o. The projection of these level in concentric ovals encircling the origin;

sets onto see

Figand

of course, obvious in the examples above, for certain classes of functions known locally

functions\"; namely, those 2 ues of the Hessian matrix (8 V(x)j In this case, the positive. Implicit \"Morse

2

functions

8x i 8xj)

Function

V (x)

for which

evaluated at Theorem

local

the

as

eigenval-

minima

implies that

are these)))

9.3.

279)

Functions

Liapunov

v)

x 2)

V(x 1 ' X 2) =

= V(x 1 ' X 2)

c 2)

c2

= V(x 1 ' X 2)

c 1) x 1)

X 2)

x,)

the

Graph and

9.5.

Figure

Also, one can

are isolated.

minima

local

of a

curves

level

positive

V near

function

definite

origin.)

the minima are diffeomorphic isfactory characterization In

homogeneous

Here is an

variables.

of

level sets of

choice of positive

standard

the

situations,

simple

from

come

the

V near a sat-

However,

positive

definite

available.

is not

function

that

show

to circles; see the Appendix. the level sets of an arbitrary

quadratic polynomials for positive

test

elementary

functions

definite

(quadratic

definiteness

in two

forms)

of such

func-

tions:)

A homogeneous quadratic function V(XI, X2) c are real numbers, is positive + cx\037, where a, b, and - b 2 > o.) only if a > 0 and ac 9.11.

Lemma 2bxIX2

and

= definite

aXI + if

of the on the coefficients; conditions will prove the necessity that V is positive from similar follows reasoning. Suppose sufficiency If X2 =1= 0 is we must have a o. if 0 definite. Since V(XI, > > Xl =1= 0, 0) zeros Xl of be no real for all and there can then 0 > Xl fixed, V(XI, X2)

We

Proof.

the

V(XI, be

X2).

Thus

negative.

0

Now, we

the x =

the

would

level

sets

f(x),

then)

of

discriminant

like

to

4(b

2

-

ac) of

this quadratic function must

how the solutions of x = f(x) cross definite function V. If x( t) is a solution of

determine

a positive

8V

V(x(t)) = a Xl

(x(t))

Xl(t)

+

8V a X2)

(x(t)) X2(t).

(9.16))))

280

9:

Chapter

Near

Equilibria)

xO)

= k)

V(x)

= k)

V(x)

V(x)

V(XO)=O)

V(XO) 0, the orbit is crossing the level curve are shown in Figure 9.6. With these These three observations, possibilities is quite plausible: the following basic theorem of Liapunov

Theorem and V be

9.12.

(i) IfV(x) (ii) If V (x) (iii)

IfV(x)

Let x = 0 be an equilibrium point C 1 function on a neighborhood

(Liapunov)

definite

a positive

< 0

for


0

x

E U

x E

for x E

- {O}, then

U U

-

{O},

then

{O}, then

0

= f(x)

ofi. U

of

O.

is stable.

0 is

asymptotically

0 is

unstable.)

stable.

of the geometric remarks we will give a formal above, proof of the be small so that the Let \342\202\254 0 > neighborhood only. sufficiently in U. Let m be is contained origin consisting of the points with Ilxll < \342\202\254 = of this the minimum value of V on the boundary \342\202\254 neighborhood. Ilxll = \342\202\254 is closed definite and the set Ilxll and bounded, Since V is positive that such we have m > O. Now choose a 8 with 0 < 8 < \342\202\254 V(x) < m for = O. < is with 8. a 8 exists because V continuous Such always V(O) IIxll = xO satisfies of i. = f(x) with If Ilxoll < 8, then the solution x(t) x(O) < V(xO) for that for t > 0 since V(x(t)) < 0 implies V(x(t)) Ilx(t)11 < \342\202\254 t > O. This proves the stability of the equilibrium point at the origin. 0, there is a 8 > largest

0

eigenvalue of B, V(x)

+

2x

that

such

T

Bg(x).

Ilg(x)1I < mllxll if

then)

< -(1

-

T 2{3m)x x.)))

IIxll


0 for all x EOn U, then the origin is an unstable equilibrium point. (ii) V(x)

for

x on

all

of

0 inside

U;

illustrated in Figure 9.8 a typical situation dethe property (i), there are points in 0, hence that are arbitrarily close to the origin. From (ii) and (iii), no orbit of these from of 0 in U. points in 0 can cross the boundary starting anyone also from such orbits must leave the U Thus, neighborhood through (iii), 0. Consequently, the origin is an unstable equilibrium

X2

x E 0, and V(x) V along the solutions

the

and

x\037/2

-Xl

open

-1,

eigenof

none

region)

}.)

on the

== 0

the

Therefore, let us

is applicable.

X2) : Xl >

{ (Xl,

V(x) > 0 for of derivative

the origin. Notice that since at the origin are 0 and

sections

two

previous

function

the

consider

field

vector

linearized

theorems

the

at

point

equilibrium

285)

Functions

Liapunov

Next,

boundary. differential

of the

we

equations

above:)

It

is not

estimate)

.

X2) >

V(XI,

0 is small. By

c >

a quadratic

in

form

0

xI,

4 -

X\037) +

2

(1 +

x\037.

the

right-hand

it is

easy to

and thus

X2,)

side of

V(x)

E 0.

x

this inequality as

> 0 for x in a Now, the conditions

that

see

for

the

2

+

x I

c)IX2I

in particular,

and,

are satisfied

9.17

Theorem

==

Xl

viewing

and

IX21

of x

neighborhood of

-

X2(X\037

a sufficiently

in

where

-

xi

obvious that we are in the realm of Cetaev's theorem. small neighborhood U of the origin, we have the

immediately

However,

==

X2)

V(XI,

is unstable.

origin

0) .-.(/.0)

Exercises)

9.11.

Graphics: Computer

V(Xl,

X2)

==

V(Xl,

X2)

==

itive

definite.)

X\037

9.14. No

linear

determining cause the quadratic

(a) Xl

Use an

-

show

CX2

== ==

X\037+

+

(1

capabil-

2x\037; \037X\037;

\037X\037

-

COSXl).

where these

origin

a

are

functions

of odd

polynomial

pos-

degree can-

> 0,

the

-X\037 +

==

-X\037 + 2x\037,

(c) Xl

==

-

XlX\037,

X\037,

X2 == -2X\037X2 X2 == -2XlX\037;

consult

-

types x\037;

X2 == XlX\037 + 2X\037X2 + X\037.)))

system

of the

Section 8.3. is of no

linearization

below,

of the

\037 +00.

equilibrium point at is the zero matrix.

Jacobian matrix at the origin functions, determine the stability

==

solution

every

origin as t function;

quadratic

For the three systems the stability type of the

of Xl.)

power

for c

that,

part:

X\037

XlX2 + + \037X\037

homogeneous

approaches

appropriate

Xl

(b)

the

and factor out

9.12 to

== X2, X2 == -Xl

Suggestion:

of

x\037+

X2)

X2)

V(Xl,

X\037;

Show that a

== aXl,

X2

Use Theorem Xl

==

V(Xl,

of

graphs

definite.

positive

Hint: Take

X2)

V(Xl,

2)2;

neighborhoods

Odd polynomials: be

of a

4x\037;

a very

a standard

locate

+ X+ +

Find

not 9.13.

(Xl

X2) == X\037 the largest

V(Xl,

9.12.

x\037 +

useful tool for plotting package with 3-D graphics few functions, for example, is

graphics

functions. You should ities and plot the graphs

the However,

origin:

in

help

origin

beusing

286

Near

9:

Chapter

9.15. After

Equilibria)

the

Consider

Dirichlet:

and

Lagrange

Xl = X2,

=

X2

conservative

system)

-g(Xl),)

l

say, C . isolated minimum point Xl of the potential function xl du to a stable point equilibrium corresponds (Xl, 0) of the g(u) fo

where the

(a)

function

9 is,

each

that

Show

system. See

Help:

(b) Give

an

function 9 such that Xl is not a minimum and yet (Xl, 0) is a stable equilibrium point.

of a

function

potential

Hint: Try a 9.16.

14.

Chapter example

V(Xl,

X2) =

original

the

9.17. Consider

Can

X2).

-X\037V(Xl,

the

function.

nonanalytic

Suppose that you have the function whole (Xl, x2)-plane and that relative of the

of

differential

equation?

defined V(Xl, X2) = x\037e-Xl to some planar differential

you conclude anything about If not, what is the trouble?

the

on the equation solutions

of equations)

system

Xl =

X2

-

Xl!(Xl,

X2)

- x2f(xl,

X2 = -Xl

X2),)

Notice that the origin is an equilibrium real-valued C l function. function, point independent of the specific form of !. U sing a quadratic of the origin, then show that if f(xl, neighborhood X2) > 0 in some open the origin is asymptotically stable. What is the stability type of the origin if ! (Xl, X2) < 0 in a neighborhood of the origin?

is a

where!

9.18.

origin is an unstable

the

that

Show

.

= Xl3

Xl

.23 = -X2

+

X2

. V(Xl,

in a 9.19.

small

Actual determine of

the

6 X2) = Xl

+

>

-

x\037

basin of attraction: the largest

-

=

-

(1 +

the

= -Xl

X2 = =

1/9.)))

xt /4

x\037/2 2

+

Xl

-

show) X2)

> 0)

the

the basin 2 X2

-2X2 +

-

and

\037x\037

function

+

Xl')

+ x2(1

Xl)

origin, except

Using

.

x\037/4

X2)

+ XlX2

ellipse contained in

system)

+

X2

3 X2 X l

of the

neighborhood

xI/2

+

\037IX211xl13

Xl

Answer:

XlX2

the function V (Xl,

Consider

Hint:

for the system)

point

equilibrium

3x\037.)

origin

V(Xl,

itself. X2)

=

of attraction

xI/2 + of the

x\037/4,

origin

9.4.

to convince yourself that the than this is ellipse. However, origin larger there are other equilibrium because points.)

Experiment tion of the plane

that

Suppose

: IR \037 IR,

1/;

a

1---+

1/;(0'), ds

> 0 if a -# 0, and satisfying 1/;(0) = 0, 0'1/;(0') J: 1/;(s) with kp > 0, show constants For k, c, and p positive +00. of the indirect control problem)

-kx -

x =

=

\037,

\037

a = ex

1/;(0'),)

01

is a

entire

function

as

\037 +00

that

-

of attrac-

not the

it is

287)

Principle

basin

actual

numerically

control:

Indirect

9.20.

lnvariance

An

\037

10'1

solution

every

p\037,)

zero as t \037 +00. above control\" comes from the fact that in the system label \"indirect of the state variable the control variable \037is not given directly as a function another differential equation. In it is determined indirectly using X; instead, indirect control turns out to be very efficient; on related certain situations, matters, see, for example, Lefschetz [1965].) approaches

The

Invariance

An

9.4.

In this

section,

of the

discussion

detailed

exposition

in a

setting

the

case of

to

specialize

of Liapunov functions with a more stable of an asymptotically

our study

basin

In preparation

point.

equilibrium

Principle)

continue

we

is

that

attraction

of

for later chapters, we will commence for general limit sets and

equilibrium

points.)

U of JR2 is said to be spectively, negatively invariant] under the flow



see

Let

setting.

general

f be

a given C k

with

function,

1,)

--t JR?;

f : JR?

x

r--+

f(x),)

satisfying) ==

f(O)

0,)

the planar system of

and consider

Xl

==

X2

==

To bring the linear part of this in vector notation:)

differential

(10.1))

equations

X2)

!1(XI, -X2

== 0)

Df(O)

+ !2(XI,

system

(10.2))

X2).

to the

let

forefront,

us write

it,

for

a moment,

x= (\037

\037l)X+f(X).

the linear part of the vector field about the equilibrium point Form with eigenvalues at the origin is in Jordan Normal 0 and -1. In apthe linearization of a vector field with one zero and one negative plications, Notice

eigenvalues

that

may

such a vector

not

field

coordinates and a

can

always come in normal be put into this always

rescaling

of

the

independent

form form

[Eq. with

variable

(10.2)]; a linear t.)))

however,

change of

294

9:

Chapter

Near

Equilibria)

x2

X21

I

/

/ I I

/' /----t--........ I\037

W

(0, U)

l

\"\\

I

I

t I

and

its

With

\\ \\

\\ \\ \"

I

/

WS(O,U))

(0, U)

I

t I

/

x,

/ WS (0, U)

....._--,-/../)

The local stable and near the origin.)

9.11.

Figure

I

.//

--l/

U

'\\

I ,

\"

I

'........

u!

II x,)

I

W

\037

//'/-\\ \\ \\)

4

U

U

local

of Eq.

manifolds

unstable

(9.21)

linearization

the

noteworthy

intent

of obtaining a of

features

the

example

general

above.

let

result,

The

local

us isolate

stable

several

[respectively,

manifold of the origin of the nonlinear system is a smooth graph of the linearized manifold sys[respectively, unstable] tem. Furthermore, the local stable [respectively, unstable] manifolds of the at the equilibrium point. nonlinear system and its linearization are tangent of the phase portrait If linearization is to reflect the qualitative features in near an equilibrium we expect of a nonlinear system point, then, general, The theorem below secures that this is indeed these observations to be true. we that since linearization is a local process, the case. We should emphasize unstable]

over

the

local stable

can expect success only locally above is a bit too example are

graphs

globally.

where this is not state our general

the local

near special;

an equilibrium local stable

its

Later in this section, we will case, and explore this issue theorem.)))

point. In this sense, and unstable manifolds present further.

other But,

the

examples let us

first,

9.5. By an

Al < 0,

where

Dg(O) =

to the

planar

dif-

saddle

can

general

origin is a

form\

\"normal

Xl =

AlXl +

X2 =

A2 X 2

gl (Xl,

X2)

+ g2(Xl,

0, and the function the local stable that

>

A2

Notice

o.

a

whose

f(x)

be transformed

always

of a

of coordinates, change at the linearization

linear

appropriate

equation x =

ferential

Saddle

Preservation

(9.22)) X2),)

g

satisfies

g2)

(gl,

and unstable

= 0,

g(O) of

manifolds

the

at the origin are, respectively, the Xl- and x2-axis. Let us into the normal has been now that our differential put suppose equation form (9.22). Then we have the following theorem:

linearization

Theorem 9.29. neighborhood U local

a8>

(9.22), there is {(Xl, X2) : IXll < 8, IX21 < of the equilibrium point manifolds

unstable

the

For

system

-

U)

WS(O,

WU(O, U)

= {(Xl,

X2)

X2 =

= {(Xl,

X2)

Xl

8}

at

hs(Xl),

= hu (X2),

where the functions hs and hu are as smooth as the Furthermore, they satisfy) = 0,

h s (0)

hu (0)

=

dhs

= 0,

(0)

0,)

such

0

that,

the

are

origin

IXll


0, J-t >

> (1 -

x 2)

x v=o)

v=o)

2)

f)

e

Pe

e'

x, P

e)

,

f')

9.13.

Figure

saddle the

level

the existence of the stable The diagonal Principle. the quadratic function V.)

Proving Wazewski's

using

of

curves

is a point pe remains in

3. There

with

similar

Pe on

the

square

that the O.

There

and

of a

hyperbolic

hyperbolas

solution

is also

c.p(t, pe)

a

point

two pieces of the side e such that solutions via the side I, and the solutions piece leave the square Use continuity via the side I'. the other piece leave the square to initial data. respect Show that c.p(t, Pe) -+ 0 as t -+ +00. one

Hint: 5. The similar

Use

are

through on e'

Pe'

properties.

Consider

Hint:

4.

the side e such for all t >

manifold lines

fact

the

point Pe

is

properties.)))

through through with

V(c.p(t, pe)) -+ 0 as t \037 +00. on e. There is also a unique point Pe' on e' with

unique

268

9:

Chapter

Equilibria)

To study

Proof

the

x(t) -

y(t) = y =

point

point x

the equilibrium

that

so

0 of the

differential

f(y + the

=

x)

written

are

since

in the

going

of Eq. (9.3) is For

corresponds

g(y) = 0

f(x) =

0,

equilibrium

can

we

the function

expand

future

and

Dg(O) =

(9.2))

y =

equation

f(y +

be

can

x)

+ g(y).)

to prove the theorem by showing

asymptotically stable. we note

reference,

to the

II

that

the

(9.3))

that

solution

the

(9.2)

properties

\"small\" compared to y. More Theorem for any m > that,


< fJ} such that)

-'l/J(Xl) +

The latter

Eigenvalue)

is

a C

k+

as

O(IX\037+ll)

l

function

Xl

\037

with)

0,

(10.5))

a =1= 0 is a real number, k is a positive integer, and 'ljJ( Xl) is as of the planar in the equilibrium point at the origin Eq. (10.3). Then given if and k is an is stable a 0 odd integer; < system Eq. (10.2) asymptotically where

otherwise, it is

Prool.

It is

unstable.

convenient

to introduce the

y =

variables

new

(Yl,

Y2)

defined

by)

Xl = Yl, In

these

the original

variables

=

Y2 +

'ljJ(Yl).

system (10.2)

Yl = Y2

X2

91 (Yl,

= -Y2

becomes)

Y2)

(10.6))

+ 92(Yl,

Y2),)

where)

Y2) =

fl(Yl,

'ljJ(Yl)

+

Y2)

92(Yl, Y2) = 12(Yl, 'ljJ(Yl)

+

Y2)

9l(Yl,

-

'ljJ' (Yl)

11 (Yl,

-

12(Yl, 'l/J(Yl))

'ljJ(Yl)

+

Y2).)

The stability properties of the equilibrium point y = 0 of Eq. (10.6) are the same as those of the equilibrium point x = 0 of Eq. (10.2). concern a sufficiently small neighSince the conclusions of the theorem to determine the borhood of the origin, we proceed, as you might suspect, of these about the origin. functions first several terms of the Taylor series

Using Eqs.

(10.5)

and

9l(Yl,

Y2) =

92(Yl,

Y2)

=

as

we obtain,

(10.4),

ay\037 [1

0

+ 0 (lIyll)]

(Iy\037+ll)

+

\037

Ilyll

Y2 0

+

Y2

0,)

0 (llyll) (10.7))))

(1Iyll).)

10.1. Stability us now

Let

consider the

function

V ( YI, Y2 ) and

Eq. (10.7), V(YI,

we

that

==

[1 +

_y\037k




If

'ljJ: {A

:

is a

F

> 0 and a IIAII

equations)

Xl,

(A,

determine the small values of We begin our analysis with a lemma points of the system (10.11) in terms of F

where

(10.10))

X2)

Xl,

FlCX,

== o.)

Df(O)

0,

differential

of

system

==

f(O)

X2),)

of equibifurcations A. the equilibrium determining

the

parameter

for

>

k

of a

zeros

the

Ok function,

the

of

nature

1,

then

scalar equation. there are

constants

function)

Ok

AO} X {Xl


O. bifurcation

1 )

COS(XI

COS(XI

a saddle-node

undergoes

-

-

is now in

(10.19)

system

_

(

equivalently)

ses of Theorem

the

p-l

x + \0371)

(\037

The

-1

1

0

becomes)

(10.18)

x = or

eigenval-

and (-1, 1).

variables)

of

( then

(1, 0)

eigenvectors

P==

Px,)

observe that its

Form,

corresponding

the transformation

make

if we

Therefore,

the

is)

origin

Normal

Jordan

0 and

are

ues

matrix

The coefficient

point.

!1).)

(\037

To put

urn

If

we

IX

II)3),)

substitute

Taylor series of the

cosine,

this

ex-

then

a

(10.21

))))

yields)

AXI +

\037XI

+

O((IAI

+

IXII)3).)

10.2. Bifurcations the form of

From

the vector is

function

bifurcation

field

Xl)

G(>\",

Eq. (10.20) it is clear that the the scalar differential

and

(10.19)

=

Therefore

Xl).

1jJ(>..,

319)

equation (10.15) becomes) =

Xl

By appealing ria of Eq.

to

(10.22) at

bifurcation

>..

Using the

-

>.. +

2.3, you near the origin, = o. 0

and their

torque.

The

With

to be determined. of center manifolds.)

remains theory

stability

this

of a

presence

(10.19) near the

of Eq.

flow

complete

of equilib-

bifurcations

the the

(10.22))

saddle-node

succeeded in accounting for the of the damped pendulum with

we have

function

bifurcation

0((1>\"1 + IXII)3).)

+

\037X\037

should analyze and confirm

Section

of equilibria

bifurcations

+

>\"XI

\037>..2

purpose

still

however,

origin,

in mind,

to

we now turn

Exercises)

the

-'Q'O)

the

10.6. Draw

bifurcation

for the

diagrams

equilibrium

of the

solutions

following

systems:

10.7.

(a) Xl

=

(b) (c)

= X2, = 3AXl

Xl Xl

Analyze

-X2,

X2 = '\\Xl X2 = -X2 - 3AX2 -

-

+ x\037

the equilibrium

X2; x\037

-

X2 =

10.8.

Consider

origin

for

A;

their

and

-

AXI

-

(A

the following system

x\037 +

2XlX2

1)x2 +

x\037 +

on

depending

J.L

. X2 =

-

3 Xl X2

bifurcation curves approximate equilibria near (0, 0). Also sketch each region of the parameter space. the

for the for 10.9.

Odd

F2

in

symmetry: Suppose Eq. (10.11) satisfy, Fi(A,

1. Show

that x that

=0

a scalar

A is for

i =

3.

If {)2G(0, O)/{)A{)Xl bifurcation pitchfork

function

i= 0 and

at

Xl near

the

system)

XlX2,)

two

A. A and

parameters

J.L:)

+ XlX2 2 Xl

+

\\ A.)

the origin in the ('\\, phase representative

parameter and the

functions

J.L)-plane portraits

Fl

and

-Fi(A,

Xl,

X2).)

a solution.

is always

Show

2 XlX2

the

of

2,)

-X2) =

-Xl,

the bifurcation

2.

1,

types

parameter

2

-X2 +

X2.

stability

values of the scalar

small

. Xl =

Find

AXI -

X2 =

x\037,

points

Xl =

near the

-

,\\ =

G(A,

Xl) is

{)3G(0, O)/{)x\037 O.)))

odd in

i= 0,

Xl.

show that

there

is

a

320

4.

Presence

In the

10:

Chapter

Eigenvalue) functions in all analytic is also analytic. Using Xl)

and F 2 are function G(>\",

that

Suppose

a Zero

of

Fl

the bifurcation

that if 8 2 G(0, 0)/8>..8xl i= 0, then either there at >.. == 0, or G(>\", Xl) - 0 for>.. == O. 10.10.

is a

that>.. Even symmetry: Suppose and F2 in Eq. (10.11) satisfy, for

1. Show

that

G(>\",

If 8G(0, 0)/8>.. node bifurcation

i=

Xl) is 0 and

at

== F i >.., Xl, (

X2)

Consider

where cuss

the planar

Fl

X2).)

show

that

is a

there

saddle-

show that

i= 0,

0)/8>..

there is

a saddle-

system)

Xl

==

11 (Xl,

X2)

X2

==

J.LX2 +

lIXl + 12(Xl,

f(O) == 0, Df(O) == 0, and the stability properties of the

and compute the bifurcation form. Then normalize function How do the again.

J.L i=

0 and

the two

0 are given constants. Disbe daring at the origin. First, into part putting the linear

part and compute

linear

cases

X2),)

1I i=

equilibrium without function

normal

10.12.

functions

the

and

show bifurcation fact,

o.

3. If G(>\", Xl) is analytic and 8G(0, node bifurcation at >.. == o.) 10.11.

a pitchfork

scalar parameter

even in Xl. 8 2 G(0, 0)/8x\037 i= 0,

>.. ==

this

i == 1, 2,)

F i ( >.., - Xl,

2.

is

Then

variables.

the

bifurcation

compare?

of the origin, obtain Bifurcation from a simple eigenvalue: In a neighborhood those values Q == Q* (x\037) such that the following system has an equilibrium point on the line Xl == X\037:) Xl

== QXl

+ 11 (Xl,

X2)

+/2(Xl,

X2),)

X2 == -X2 where

equili

bria

(the

Xl )-plane

in the

Observe

Hint:

and

== 0

f(O)

the (Q,

10.13.Let

usual way. the sign

that

Theorem 10.8.

Df(O) == O. Draw some possible curves the stable bifurcation curve) and label of 8G/8xl

is the

sign

of

Q == Q*(Xl)

in

and unstable

-(Q*)'(x\037)x\037 and

use

functions of paramea 2 x 2 matrix whose entries are continuous the eigenvalues of A(O) are distinct, show that the eigenvalues of >.. == O. of >.. in a neighborhood of A(>\") are continuous functions of real eigenvalues If J.Ll (>..) and J.L2(>\") are Hint I: (For real eigenvalues) == and then that the line tr A(O) implies J.Ll (0) + J.L2(0) J.Ll (0) i= J.L2(0) A(>\,") the hyperbola det A(O) == J.Ll (0)J.L2 (0) intersect at two points. (Draw their persists. pictures.) For>.. i= 0 and small, the picture Hint II: Show that [tr A(>..)]2 - 4 det A(>\") i= 0 at >.. == O. == 0 and Hint III: Let us suppose that Ao is A(>\") == Ao + B(>\,") where B(O) of how))) a diagonal matrix of the form Ao == diag (J.L\037,J.Lg). Here is an outline A(>\") be

ters>..

E

:IRk. If

10.3. Center the

to use for

small

A

of bifurcation

method =1= o. A

number

nonzero vector x == is equivalent to the pair

is a

there

which

function to find is an eigenvalue (Xl, X2) such that

(A)Xl +

[J.Lg

(A)]Xl

+

J.L\037 v

+

b ll

-

result

the bifurcation equation conclude, with Theorem, that v can be determined as

to n x n

applicable

J.L\037I

J.L\037

if and -

only if == x 0, vI]

b 12

(A)X2

== 0

== O.)

b22(A)]X2

the help a function

of

of Xl.

Substitute From

equation.\"

the of

Function

Implicit A.

This

method

is

matrices.)

Manifolds)

Center

10.3.

[A(A)

near

J.Ll

of A(A)

second equation solve for X2 as a linear function into the first equation to obtain the \"bifurcation

the

From

the

eigenvalue

of equations)

[-v + b 2l

an

== + v J.L J.L\037

321)

Manifolds

In this section, we determine fine structures of flows and bifurcations near an equilibrium point at which matrix the of the linear approximation has with one zero and one negative eigenvalue. Our presentation resembles, manifolds near a certain added complications, that of stable and unstable center In fact, we will see that there is some invariant curve-local saddle. the to to line the manifold-tangent containing eigenvectors corresponding the zero eigenvalue of the linearized vector field. Since the other eigenall orbits starting near the origin this invariant value is negative, approach curve. The qualitative behavior can then of the local flow on the plane scalar differential equation be determined from the flow of an appropriate on the center we will manifold. To fix the main ideas in a simple context, we first describe the theory of center manifolds for Eq. (10.2). Eventually, will generalize the setting to the parameter dependent equation (10.11) to definition of local Let us begin with a precise study its local bifurcations. center manifolds for Eq. (10.2). is said to . WC(O,

be

a solution x(t) E

.

A Ck

10.12.

Definition

U)

curve

WC(O,

U) in

a neighborhood U

of

manifold for Eq. (10.2) under the flow of Eq. (10.2) with the initial value

Eq.

U) as long as x(t) E k is a graph of a C function WC(O, U) a.t the origin, that is,) Xl -axis WC(O,

WC(O,

where the function

U)

==

{(Xl,

origin

that is, if x(t) is U), then

(10.2),

E WC(O,

x(O)

U;

h(XI)

X2

X2)

of the

if

center is invariant

a local

==

h(XI),

==

X2 and

(Xl,

is tangent

to the

X2) E U},)

h satisfies)

h(O)

==

0,)

\037(O) aXI)

= o.

(10.23))))

322

10:

Chapter

Presence

In the

a Zero

of

Eigenvalue)

we will usually omit the word \"local\" the To U. appreciate origin neighborhood let us reexamine with center manifolds, some of the subtleties associated Example 10.1, and inspect Figures 10.1 and 10.2 a bit more closely. If there is

no

to the

10.13.

Example

of confusion,

chance

reference

the

and

and

center

Many

.

where a is a given real number. values of a and the linearization

Xl

== ax

X2

==

x.

==

(

system)

3 I (10.24))

-X2,)

The

is an

origin the

at

the product

Consider

manifolds:

origin

0

0

0

-1

equilibrium

point

for

all

is)

x.)

)

to the zero eigenvalue contains the eigenvectors corresponding xl-axis is a and is the center manifold of the linearized system. Since Eq. (10.24) product system, it is clear that the graph of h( Xl) == 0, which is the xl-axis, manifold is a center of Eq. (10.24). All orbits approach this center manifold fast and the flow of the planar exponentially system looks essentially like the flow of the scalar differential Xl == axr on the center Inanifold. equation and unstable center manifolds are not Unlike the stable manifolds, In fact, it is apparent from 10.1 that when a < 0 unique. Figure always the union of an orbit from the left half-plane and an orbit from the right with the origin, is also a center of Eq. (10.24). manifold half-plane, together More specifically, it is easy to determine that for two constants CI and any the of the function) C2 graph The

h(Xl)

==

{

l 2ax i) Cl e /(

if Xl

< 0

0

if

== 0

C2 e

l /( 2ax

i))

Xl

if Xl

>

0)

to notice, however, a center manifold of Eq. (10.24). It is important that on all of these center manifolds the flows are equivalent. Consequently, it is inconsequential of the dynamics for the qualitative study which center is we use. manifolds manifold coexistence of center Nevertheless, many for concern as it frequently is troublesome to compute a potential cause entities. We will address this issue later in this section. 1. Then,

a center ---+

comfort of this theorem, let power series of the apparent

us

Manifolds

(10.2). Suppose as Xl ---+ 0,)

that

k ).)

O(IXll

to Figure

return

manifold

center

10.2 and

deter-

a cubic

resembling

curve.)

Continuation

10.18.

Example

of the partial

differential

of Example

=

h(XI)

Thus the

manifold

center

the

on

flow

-x\037

+

10.3: The

in this

(10.27)

equation

solution

series by)

O(IXI14).) by the

determined

is

power

case is given

scalar differential

equation)

Xl

=

ax\037 +

=

xlh(XI)

ax\037

-

x1 + O(IXI15).)

It is interesting to notice that the vector field of this scalar differential terms order four as the ones we have up through equation has the same obtained earlier using the method of bifurcation function. 0 We now

the

generalize

of center

theory

to

manifolds

systems

of differ-

and investigate the depend parameters, (10.11) near the for small A. This bifurcations extension possible origin may appear to consist of insertion of a A or two into the previous definitions formally For the sake of completeness, and theorems. we will make such insertions. a geometric center From manifolds become considpoint of view, however, in the of parameters: for each small A presence erably more complicated there is a curve, and the collection of these curves form a surface-a center ential equations

manifold.

Here

the

. .

precise definition:

is the

Definition 10.19. of

on

which

curves W{(O, U) in a neighborhood U manifold for Eq. (10.11) if under the flow of Eq. (10.11), that is, ifx(t) is a solution of Eq. (10.11) with the initial value x(O) E W{(O, U), then x(t) E W{(O, U) as long as x(t) E U; = X2 and, for A = 0, is Xl) h(A, W{(O, U) is a graph of a Ok-function to the -axis the at that Xl is,) origin, tangent A

family

is said to be origin U) is invariant W{(O,

W{(O,

where the

function

U)

of Ok

center

a local

= {

(Xl,

X2)

: X2

= h(A,

Xl),

(Xl,

X2)

E U},)

h satisfies)

h(O, 0)

=

0,)

_8h

= 8 Xl) (0, 0)

O.

(10.30))))

325)

326

10:

Chapter

In the

Presence of a

Zero

Eigenvalue)

X2

A)

10.3.

Figure

To

}-X

appreciate

when a vector

field

10.20.

Example

1

The inclined plane is

some

a

of the subtleties

depends

Consider

manifold

center

associated

of Example

with

let us examine

on parameters,

center several

10.20.)

manifolds examples.

the product system \302\267

Xl =

-Xl

=

-X2

X2

3

+ A,

is the graph of h( A, Xl) = where A is a scalar parameter. A center manifold on the center manifold is given by Xl = -X\037. On the A and the flow manifold is the family of horizontal lines X2 = A (Xl, x2)-plane this center this center manifold in by A. It is more revealing to visualize parametrized in Figure it is the inclined 10.3. The intersecthe (A, Xl, x2)-space: plane are the family of lines X2 = A. tions of the inclined plane with vertical planes is to the xl-axis at A = o. 0 The plane of the center manifold tangent

Example

10.21.

Consider

the

linear

system

Xl = 0 X2

where which plane.

surface\"

=

AXI

-

X2,

is given a scalar parameter. A center manifold by h(A, Xl) = AXI, family of rotating lines given by X2 = AXI on the (Xl, X2)ruled this center manifold is the \"hyperbolic In the (A, Xl, X2 )-space in Figure 10.4. 0))) depicted

A is

is a

10.3. Center

327)

Manifolds

X 2

h,

A)

reads

The ruled surface is

10.4.

Figure

The existence as follows:)

theorem for

small

neighborhood

manifold

center

attracting

be

(10.11) in

origin

10.21.)

of Example

manifold

center

the vector field U of the

Let

10.22.

Theorem ficiently

an

a

Ok and

JR2.

Then,

for

Eq.

(10.11)

consider a for

of there exists a local center manifold W{ in U consisting of the graph for any solution x(t) with initial function h(A, Xl) = X2. Moreover, that) E U there are positive constants a and /3 such x(O)

IX2(t) as long

Despite

possible implies

be on any Because of

center

nonuniqueness the

manifold.

W{ is attracting xO E U must be we

have

lxl(O)

-

h(A,

a Ok value

(10.31))

xl(O))1)

0)

following

of center

manifolds,

property

of any center

attraction

the

point of Eq. (10.11)in

An equilibrium

10.23.

Corollary

dimensional,

U.

13t

< ae-

xI(t))1

h(A,

as x(t) E

timate (10.31)

w(xO)

-

suf-

small,

IIAII

es-

manifold:

U

must

always

0) all

in

solutions

W{.

the following

in U, the omega limit set w(xO) is invariant and W{ is one

starting

Since result:)))

328

10:

Chapter

Presence

In the

a Zero

of

10.24. The omega Corollary Eq. (10.11) with initial value

This corollary enables us to rather easily because origin Another

it

10.25.

asymptotically

on the center

==

only if the

is stable

by h

(10.32))

the

now substitute

equation (10.11), then Xl) +

F2 (A,

to the

subject

8h

a center

solution

ables

A

h(A,

of Eq. and

Xl)

where the series into equating

Xl ==

initial

defining

.

\\

for

Xl and

X2

partial

differential

differential

by the

given

equation)

_

==

FI(A,

Xl)

(A,

8 Xl)

Xl, h(A,

Xl)) (10.33)

values)

manifold

0)

(10.33),

==

_8h

8 Xl) (0, 0)

0,)

defined

we

Xl). In Xl) into

h(A,

by

h(A,

expand

== 0

search a power

an

of

series

approximate in the vari-

as)

CIOA

+

C20 A2

Cij

+ CIIAXI

are

to be

differential

partial

+

C02 X

I +

O((IAI +

determined.

equation

We

(10.33)

manifolds

power series method

now

IR

(10.34))

lI)3),)

this

substitute

and determine

are

not unique,

above

can

Cij

by

the computational effectivebe demonstrated.

again

that) g :

IX

of like terms.

the coefficients

of the

t the

to

respect

8h

Although center ness

differential

partial

of the

expressions

center manifold

of a

( A, Xl ) Xl.

8 Xl)

h(A, Xl))

Xl,

coefficients

the

_

==

a solution

h(O,

yields

asymptotically

[respectively,

the

.

-h(A,

[re-

corresponding

where

0,

0,)

as the

of bifurcation

IXII)3) .) ones

we

have

functions.

obtained

Therefore, the full to construct it is now quite easy manifold theory using the center recover To on the flow of the system of equations (Xl, x2)-plane. (10.19) that))) all coordinates the dynamics of the pendulum in the original (YI, Y2), in Example

330

remains to

To

of

in

in the

and

of

a zero

this

with

chapter

of the differences, let us reconsider that the stability properties 10.4, as the zero solution at the origin are the same

Theorem

eigenvalue-

obvious similar-

their

Despite

We conclude

==

also

the graph Theorem 10.4 relies once the result is

of

'ljJ)

( 10.36))

== O.)

the

that

know

(10.2). equilib-

of)

+ f2 (Xl,

same statement

is true

relative

equation)

Xl

where

a brief

of)

'ljJ(Xl)),)

fl(Xl,

solution

is the

'ljJ(Xl)

of the

Eq.

of the

know

10.15, we

equilibria

sta-

for investigating

methods

presence

manifolds.

ways.

-'ljJ

the

matrix P

methods.

we

where the function

From

by the

shearing

two

chapter

center

Xl

to

of

effects

some

understand

point

Eigenvalue)

equilibria

subtle

of the two

Theorem

rium

undo the

function and differ

comparison From

a Zero

presented in this

bifurcations

bifurcation

ities, they

of

1.) function

'ljJ is usually

much

Exercises)

10.14.

Many center

I-Q.0) manifolds:

Find

all center .

Xl

==

manifolds

2 Xl)

X2 == -X2.)))

of

the

system)

10.3. Center 10.15. Draw some center

of the

manifolds

331)

Manifolds

system)

.

2 Xl)

\\ == /\\ +

Xl

X2 == -X2)

in the

10 .16 .

No

Put

x2)-space.

Xl,

('\\,

center manifold:

analytic

. .

X2 is, of

==

system)

3 -Xl 2

== -X2

course, analytic.

+ Xl')

has no analytic

this system

that

Show

manifold.

center

Let h(Xl) == L7=o; i even.)

Hint:

and determine

ci x l

that

== 1,

C2

i odd,

== 0 for

Ci

== iCi for

Ci+2

10.17.

field

the

Consider

Xl

This vector

0 first.

,\\ ==

Show

that the

at the

point

equilibrium

origin

the

of

system)

. 3 2 Xl == XlX2 + aXl + b XlX2 . 2 2 X2 == -X2 + CXl + d XlX2)

stable

10.18.

if either

For Eq. (10.2), let 'l/J(Xl) manifold. Suppose that)

solution

be the

h(Xl))

fl (Xl, with

and

a#-O

b #- O.

Rotated pendulum:

a

movable

joint

and

that

Show

motion of such a pendulum motion of the pendu]um on

as usual, 1. Show that

where,

the

stability

2. If w
Wo,

() is there

the does

k

not

is

== f

and

0 ( IX 11

a

that

and h(Xl)

(10.3),

bx\037 + O(IXll

k+ 1

),)

m and

() -

sin

()

-

---t

origin

as

every

orbit approach

of

the

equation)

mil,)

from

its

rest

equilibrium

position.

and discuss vfiil for all values of w. ==

manifold

+00.

an

The

its pivot.

However, the projection by the differential

t

to

1 hinged

length

w about

velocity

of the pendulum bifurcation at Wo of the equilibrium points every orbit, except the stable t

),

i+l

is governed

() sin

a center

be

== b.

of mass

planar.

a plane

2 w cos

Eq.

the displacement is a pitchfork

properties show

==

with angular

rotated

jj =

of

a pendulum

Consider

methods.)

two

== ax \037+

f 1 ( Xl, 'l/J ( Xl))

10.19.

a+c

unstable if either problem using efforts of your computations in the

2. is

Do this the

2

< 0, or a+c == 0 and cd+bc < 0; 2 a + c > 0, or a + c == 0 and cd + bc > O. bifurcation function and a center manifold. Compare

is asymptotically

1.

point?)))

W

S

(7r, 0),

332

Chapter

10.20.

10:

On the

In the

machine: Plot on the phase

representative

rotated

Bibliographical

Presence of a

pendulum

Notes)

to

portraits observe

Zero

Eigenvalue)

computer,

of the

for example, some PHASER, using damped pendulum with torque and

the bifurcations.)

@)@)

with one zero eigenvalue was inof nonhyperbolic equilibria stability vestigated by Liapunov in 1892. His method of reducing a two-dimensional which to a scalar one has a far-reaching generalization goes under problem A nice exposition of this importhe name of Method of Liapunov-Schmidt. full details are available in Chow and tant method is given in Hale [1984]; For historical Hale reasons, [1985]. [1982] and Golubitsky and Schaeffer you may also like to see Schmidt [1908]. ideas in bifurcation The center manifold is one of the key theory. Althe first of idea had been around a proof complete long time, though the its smoothness in a neighborhood of a nonhyperbolic equilibrium point of in an ordinary differential equation appeared Kelley [1967]. By now, there are of for Carr example, expositions it; see, many [1981]. Center manifolds as well. In fact, differential case are in the of equations partial important is the existence of finite one of the most active areas of current research behavior of partial dimensional manifolds which the asymptotic capture of For reaction-diffusion equations, the existence differential equations. This inertial manifolds-has been proved. global center manifolds-called of an infinite dimensional system to is important in reducing the dynamics and Sell [1989].))) those of a finite dimensional one; see Mallet-Paret

The

11

of

Presence

the

In

Imaginary

Purely

Eigenvalues)

1 In I:

this

1

ferential

I

of

and

in

where

of

bifurca-

a planar

dif-

vector

the

\037he cas\037 li\037earized coorpolar purely ImagInary eIgenvalues. USIng we capture the of such a system in the : dinates, dynamics avoid the overabundant superscripts, we will prefer to write this system in of the equilibrium terms of the ______ point dyneighborhood as the iteration of the map) difference equations scalar differential namics of an appropriate nonautonomous equation with we appeal coefficients. For the analysis of this scalar to equation, periodic .

field

:

To

we investigate the stability nonhyperbolic equilibrium point

chapter, of a

tions

has

equatio\037

to small results in Chapters 4 and 5.\037 When the vector ,) field is subjected (15.7)) (\037\037) C\\X2(:\037 Xl)) and there can be persists, perturbations, the original equilibrium point if the eigenvalues in the neighborhood. of the newcalled However, equilibria whichno is the delayed map. logistic move from the one the atequilinearized axis, expects away imaginary at and the other two fixed one has The map system points, (0, 0) (15.7) its stability is typically marked to change Jacobian - librium type. is) matrix at theThisoriginchange (1 1/ A). The 1/ A, 1 point the a small orbit the of equilibrium point. periodic encircling by appearance result-the We present a proof of this celebrated Poincare-Andronov-Hopf of the periodic orbit. We conTheorem-and a discussion of the stability (\037 \037),) biclude with an exposition of computational for determining procedures is orbits from an A. the of and has thediagrams 0 whichfurcation periodic point.))) bifurcating equilibrium Consequently, origin asymptotieigenvalues cally

if 0 < stable The Jacobian

A




fixed

other

\302\260

(1

'\\

\037),)))

1. point

(1

- 1/ A,

1

-

1/ A)

is)

334

11:

Chapter

11.1. As

tor

In the

Presence

of

Eigenvalues)

Imaginary

Purely

Stability have

we

seen in

at an

field

Example 9.9, when equilibrium point are

the

of the

eigenvalues

linearized vecdynamics

the local

imaginary,

purely

cannot be determined by the linear approxithe equilibrium can be on the nonlinear terms, unstable, stable, or even asymptotically stable. Consequently, we need to the effects of the nonlinear terms in each situation. investigate particular In this section, we show how to carry out such an investigation by reducing the dynamics in the neighborhood of a nonhyperbolic point equilibrium with purely imaginary eigenvalues to the dynamics of a 27r-periodic scalar

about

the

mation.

point

equilibrium

depending

Indeed,

differential

equation.

Let us begin by

Example 11.1. Consider

the

. Xl = .

the

briefly

recalling

X2 =

+

2

aXI ( Xl

-Xl +

of Example

9.9.

system)

planar X2

dynamics

+

2 X2

) (11.1))

2

2 ( Xl + X2 ) ,)

aX2

a is a given real number. of the value of the constant a, Regardless the origin is an equilibrium point and the eigenvalues of the linearization at the origin are :f:i. If we introduce polar coordinates (r, 0) defined by)

where

XI = then

Eq. (11.1)

r cos

X2 =

0,)

-r

sin

0,)

(11.2))

becomes)

r =

ar

o =

1.)

3)

(11.3

))

0 > 0, the orbits spiral special product system. Since around the origin. Therefore, the stability type of the point r = 0 of origin of Eq. (11.1) is the same as that of the equilibrium if the radial r = ar 3 . Of course, r = 0 is asymptotically stable equation a < 0, stable at a = 0, and unstable 11.1. 0; see Figure This

is a

rather

in 0

monotonically

the example Unlike the linearization above, planar systems for which near an equilibrium point has purely do not always imaginary eigenvalues turn out to be product systems when transformed into coordinates. polar in this we can still pursue the line of reasoning However, with some care, the to the analysis of a 27r-periodic, rather problem example and reduce f be a than autonomous, scalar let differential To be specific, equation. k given C

function,

k >

2,)

f:

IR?

---+

IR?;

x

\037

f(x),)))

11.1. Stability

Figure purely

-0.5,

11.1.

For Eq. (11.1),

imaginary

eigenvalues; a = 0.0, and

stable

for

origin

unstable

an equilibrium point with it is asymptotically stable for a =

is always

however,

for

a = 0.5.)))

335)

336

Presence

In the

11:

Chapter

satisfying) norm

the

where ber

f(O) =

that

if

prepare

all x

for

stability of equation by

the differential

(11.4

1,)

II is

IIDf(O)

< IIDf(O)llllxll IIDf(O)xll in only were interested

we

to

cient

matrix

of the Jacobian

II
0 tinuous, we can choose f?r all 0 and Irl < 8. in a neighborhood of the origin, we have 0 > o. The pleasant Consequently, in 0 of this is that the orbits of Eq. (11.6) implication spiral monotonically we can eliminate t in Eq. (11.6) and around the origin. obtain Therefore, an equation for r as a function of 0 through the differential equation) we explain

Now,

of the

sion

dr

=

dO

R(r,

(11.9))

0),)

where)

0) =

R(r,

0)

\037(r,

1+8(r,0))

C

is a

which

k

- 1

27r-periodic, and

function,

R(O,

0)

=

satisfies)

O.)

(11.10))

solutions of Eq. (11.9) give the orbits of Eq. (11.5). We can also the solutions of Eq. (11.5) as a function of time from the solutions the steps below: of Eq. (11.9) by following The

recover

. Fix

and

ro

value

is

,( xO)

Find

the solution

r(O, ro) =

(r.o, 0)

.

find

then

roo

given

O(t)

iJ =

.

The solution given

x(t)

of

the

initial xO =

point

by)

= { (x 1, X 2)

the solution

r(O, ro) of Eq. (11.9) satisfying of Eq. (11.5) through the

orbit

The

= r (0, r 0) cos 0, X2 = -r(O, ro)sinO,

: Xl

the

of

0 < O+oo}.)

initial-value

problem)

ro),

0(0)

1 +

8(r(0,

Eq.

(11.5)

0),)

through

=

the point

O.)

XO

(11.11))

(11.12))

=

(ro,

0) is

then

by)

Xl ( t) X2(t)

= r ( 0 ( t ), ro) cos 0 (t ) =

(11.13))))

-r(O(t),

ro) sinO(t).)

337)

338

Presence

In the

11:

Chapter

Eigenvalues)

Imaginary

Purely

of

Let us now illustrate, by way of an example, the role of the 27r-periodic in the stability scalar differential equation dr/dO analysis of the equilibrium of the at the point origin system (11.5).

oscillator:

A damped

11.2.

Example

or

=

Xl

X2

. X2 =

methods

the

Using

(11.14) at the

coordinates,

the

scalar

Let

2

0 sin

-l [1

=

Taylor series of the vector

introduce the

p defined

variable

= \037:

To make

the

of

coefficient

With this

l cos(40).

[1

-

have

the

abused

same

=

\"big

Eq.

(11.17),

is

given

because

of nonhyperbolicity;

make

5 to

terms

several

this purpose, (11.16)

+ 8a'(B)] p3

+

independent

new

variable,

O(p4). of

0,

we choose

(11.16),

0\"

notation

terms

may

0

is

(11.17)

a bit, in

0

in mind,

the stable;

is also

of

this

the

Poincare

no

of

is

hence,

frOID

stable.

asymptotically

we should point

the

that

sense

on 0, but

depend

asymptotically

(11.16), r =

==

a'(O)

we obtain

+ O(p4).

-lp3

p =

In the

determined.

out

the

that

map

IT

of

by

=

II(po)

Despite the asymptotic in mind that the approach

).

of O. For

from the inspection

is obtained

which

(11.15)

+ 0(r

a(O)p3,

to be

situations

complicated

conclusion

) 4

Chapter

transformation

coefficients of the higher-order that concern. Now, it is evident the form of the transformation

With more

+

p

p3 term

the

dB we

by

4

0(r

independent

cos(4B)

dp

Here,

is given

by

of

choice

(11.14)

system

3 OJr +

from field

function

-l

2

40)]r

cos(

r = where a(O) is a 27r-periodic Eq. (11.15) becomes

the

for

3

the transformation theory

us use

stable. Let us estabsection. In polar

in this

presented

(11.9)

= -[cos

dO

of the

methods

equation

dr

(11.14))))

2 XIX2.

is asymptotically

origin

the

result with

same

the

can

it

-Xl -

in Chapter 9, Liapunov functions, and the be shown rather easily that the equilibrium

presented

Principle,

point of Eq. lish

0,)

the system)

equivalently

Invariance

y =

y2iJ +

+

jj

differen-

second-order

the

Consider

tial equation)

Po

stability, to

the

-

lpg + 0(P6). it is of practical equilibrium

see Figure

11.2. )

consideration

is not exponential

to

keep

(slow!)

11.1. Stability

librium

used in procedure case of Eq. (11.5).

The

which

has

constant

a nonzero

the

example

All

that

11.3.

Lemma the

with

a < 0; In

it

otherwise

some

the

f =

+

ap2k+1

it may

situations,

in Eq.

(11.5)

p -+ 0,

a positive integer. Then the equilibrium is asymptotically stable if (11.5)

system

planar

is unstable.

as

o(lp2k+11)

k is

number,

of the

With

exercises).

2k + 2 function (/1, /2) is a C transformed scalar equation)

corresponding

a =I 0 is a real at the origin

(see

is immediate.

result

dO)

where

For Eq.

dr j dO to the equation dp j dO of the vector field expansion (11.9), it is possible to show

always be odd

must

that

Suppose

dp =

point

Taylor

be extended to the transformation theory

easily

is the

equation the

coefficient.

that this lowest order term these remarks, the following

can

above

is needed

the scalar term in

5.2 to convert the lowest order

Section

from

stable equi-

an asymptotically

with

point

general

for

For Eq. (11.14), the origin is purely imaginary eigenvalues.)

11.2.

Figure

0, then the solution r(O, ro) of Eq. (11.9) ifxo also, in O. Conversely, if the initial value r(O, ro) = ro is 21f-periodic satisfying then orbit with is a solution of the 21f-periodic Eq. (11.9), r(xO) r(O, ro) is a periodic orbit. The minimal xO = (ro, 0) of the planar system (11.5) of t for which the solution T of such a r is the first value period O(t) of

11.6.

Lemma

such

that

Eq. (11.12) satisfies) O(T)

=

21f.)

(11.18))

of the orbits of Eq. (11.5) near the The reduction of the discussion has of solutions of to the discussion important consequences Eq. (11.9) gin of for limit sets of orbits of Eq. (11.5). The result below is a special case

Poincare-Bendixson

more

fully

in

the

Theorem, next

chapter:)))

a

fundamental

result

which

orithe

we will explore

11.1. Stability 11.7. There is a bounded ifxo E U and the solution

Theorem that

such

t >

for

0 [respectively, t < 0],

a(xO)] is either a

the

or the

the origin in 1R2

(11.5) remains in

xO)

of Eq.

omega-limit

set

equilibrium

point at

cp(t,

then

orbit

periodic

U of

neighborhood

341)

U

[respectively,

w(xO) the

origin.

that U is as in Theorem 4.11. If cp(t, xO) of Eq. (11.5) Suppose in U for t > 0 (or t < 0), then the solution r(O, ro), with ro = Ilxoll, > < is bounded for 0 0 (or 0 4.11 of (11.9) that implies 0). Theorem solution of Eq. (11.9). Now, the desired r(O, ro) approaches a 21T-periodic conclusions follow from the relations (11.13). (; Proof.

remains

of the

of

notions

though

problem

of

stability, to

alluded

asymptotic it, have not

stability

yet

the

relating

planar system (11.5) to that the scalar equation (11.9).

of

solution

to the

turn

now

We

orbit

In

Chapter

of solutions on

agreed

type of a periodic corresponding 21T-periodic 4 we have defined

stability

of the

a precise

the

alnotion of stability of a with the definianalogy of

(11.9),

Eq.

but,

of a planar autonomous system. By of an equilibrium point of a planar system, it is tempting to stability orbit define a periodic as stable if any orbit starting near the periodic orbit close to the periodic orbit for all positive time. Unfortunately, this stays notion turns out to be a bit too restrictive. For the equilibrium example, at the of the is surrounded point planar pendulum origin by concentric it is natural to consider of these periodic orbits; therefore, anyone periodic orbits to be stable. orbits have different However, any two such periodic time could be at diametrically periods and thus at a fixed opposite they To overcome this dilemma, we consider a periodic orbit r of positions. as a closed curve and its time parametrization. In this Eq. neglect (11.5) we define the distance of a point x E H{,2 to a periodic orbit r, context, orbit

periodic

tion

of

denoted

by

dist

(x, r), dist

that

be

orbitally

11.9.

Definition

-

xii, for

all x

E

r}.)

if, for

Notice

chapter, that

b

implies

in the definition Poincare-Bendixson

that

of the

w(xO)

r of Eq. (11.5)is said to be orbitally stable and, in addition, there is a b > 0 that dist(cp(t, xO), r) -+ 0 as t -+ +00,

A periodic orbit is orbitally

asymptotically stable if it such that dist(xO, r) < that is, w(xO) C r. quence

- min{ Ilx

A periodic orbit r of the planar system (11.5) is said to that dist (xO, r) < 6 > 0, there is a 6 > 0 such any \342\202\254 for all t > O. The orbit r is said dist (cp(t, periodic XO), r) < \342\202\254 if it is not orbitally stable.) unstable

stable

orbitally

implies

to

r)

(x,

as)

11.8.

Definition be

to

=

r.)))

above we said theorem, to be

w(XO) presented

c r.

It is a

in the

conse-

following

342

In the

11:

Chapter

Presence

Eigenvalues)

Imaginary

Purely

of

r of Eq. (11.5) is said to be orbitally A periodic orbit if it is orbitally stable with asymptotically asymptotic phase asymptotically for any xO with dist (XO, < b and stable and, moreover, yO E r there r)

Definition

11.10.

exists a real

number

that)

lJ such

-

xO)

Ilcp(t,

these definitions, in With this section, the theorem below

Let r

11.11. Theorem the corresponding

.

as t

lJ, yO)11 \037 0

+

cp(t

\037 +00.)

conjunction with our earlier

in

observations

immediate:

is almost

of Eq. (11.5) and let 1/;(0) be 21T-periodic (11.9). Then if r is orbitally stable orbitally asymptotically stable] [respectively, of as a solution is stable asymptotically [respectively, stable] 1/;( 0) orbit

a periodic

be

of Eq.

solution

Eq. (11.9),

. r

with asymptotic phase if it is orand, bitally asymptotically any solution r(O, ro) ofEq. (11.9) v such that the solution O(t) with there is a real number ro near 1/;(0), of the initial-value problem) is

stable

asymptotically

orbitally

stable

iJ =

the

has

1 +

O(t)

property

for

ro),

8(r(0,

- t

as t

\037 lJ

=

0(0)

0),)

\037 +00.

0)

0)

Exercises)

11.1.

-, 0 there

A(\037)x+F(\037,

x)

in U. essential

part of the vector

field.

hypotheses The

of the

requirement

theorem that

the

concern vector)))

11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf field vanish at the origin is inconsequential with a change of variables around an

cover some

resulting periodic terms. This poses later

address

will

theorem

cation

of this

details

finer

the

of

must

one

orbit, nontrivial

always

such

the

investigate

as the

where A is a scalar that the origin is

Xl

==

several

X2

==

an

2

r

isolated

==

xI

)XI

(11.20))

F satisfies F( 0, 0) == In polar coordinates,

==

F(A,

r

2

)r

types

and

of

2

a ) r 0 or F(A, 0, then Eq. (11.20) with \"amplitude\" The bifurcation diagram ==

==

of periodic equilibrium

corresponding

differential

scalar

the

properties

stability

same as the

0 so

this

(11.21))

0==1.)

The existence

form)

system)

product

r

are the

periodic

of the

r 2 )X2')

point.

equilibrium

7

Chapter of

2

x\037, and

+

from

system

planar

+ F(A,

-Xl

exhibiting

examples

specific

special

F( A, r

X2 +

parameter,

the

becomes

system

the rather

nonlinear

the

some of which we challenges on a proof of the bifurembarking

computational

Consider

11.13.

To un-

stability of the

of

effects

bifurcations of periodic orbits from an equilibrium. let us reconsider a familiar As our first example, system for bifurcation diagrams and illustrate some of the possibilities orbits near an equilibrium point.) Example

satisfied

be

point.

equilibrium

arbitrary

bifurcation,

in this chapter. Before above, let us examine

it can

since

345)

Bifurcation

solutions of

points

Eq.

(11.20)

their stability if either Indeed,

and

2 equation r == F( A, r )r. is a 21T-periodic -asint) (acost,

solution

of

a.

solutions of Eq. (11.20) is simply periodic a 2 ) == 0 in the (A, a)-plane together with the A-axis. As usual, stable periodic orbits are indicated by solid curves and curves. unstable ones with dashed Let us now take several forms for F and draw the specific correspondbifurcation diagrams. ing . For F( A, r) == A: we obtain a linear perturbation of the linear harorbit monic oscillator. There is no nontrivial periodic except at A == 0, a. All peorbit for each amplitude at which case there is one periodic riodic orbits are orbitally stable. See Figure 11.3a for the bifurcation

a plot

of

the

for

of F(A,

solutions

diagram.

.

- r 2 : there

is a unique nontrivial periodic if orbit of a; namely, a == JX. The periodic orbit 11.3b for the bifurcation))) is orbitally asymptotically stable. See Figure For F( A, A > 0 for

r)

==

A

a particular

value

346

Presence of Purely Imaginary

In the

11:

Chapter

diagram.

Because

the right,

the

. For

==

r)

F(>\",

is called

-

2

-(r

are two

nontrivial

orbitally

asymptotically 2 + c )1/2] 1/2.

[c::t

(>..

>.. decreases

2 c)2 + c

supercritical. >.. with c > 0

+

one

orbits,

periodic

through

curve emanates

bifurcation

the

bifurcation

-c 2 . There is

bifurcation

Because

diagram.

the

bifurcation

the

left,


..

only one See


.. > 0 and 11.3c for the complete

coalesce

orbits

periodic

it is orbitally asymptotically stable. origin to

2

a

the

from

unstable

orbitally

for -c

stable,

The two

Eigenvalues)

periodic

Figure

the bifurcation curve emanates is called subcritical.

the

from

In

each of these the hypotheses of the Poincare-Andronovexamples bifurcation theorem are satisfied. The existence of a periodic orbit Hopf with small amplitude for small >.. as asserted by the theorem is evident; orbit depends on the nonlinear the stability type of the periodic however, terms of the vector field. Moreover, as seen in the first and last cases, there with large amplitudes, for a can also be additional periodic orbits, possibly in Figure 11.3 a glance at the bifurcation given small 1>\"1. Indeed, diagrams of the general situation should be a diagram suggests that the bifurcation distortion of that of the linear harmonic oscillator but the diagram is still a graph over the a-axis. (;

second

Our

This

famous

is realistic

and it points

Example

11.14.

order

differential

orbit

periodic

More

bifurcation.

the way

Van der

>.. ==

0,

ple 11.2.

thus

the

For>..

origin

It is clear the

to the

-

(2)''

Consider

oscillator:

small

on a

-

y2)y +

y

==

scalar

the

following

second>..:)

parameter

0,)

system)

planar

Xl

==

X2

X2

==

-Xl

+

2>\"X2

-

( 11.22))

XI X2.)

the lineariz ation of Eq. (11.22) about the equilibare>.. ::t i y' l - >..2. For>.. < 0, the origin is asympthe real parts of the eigenvalues are negative. At in stable as we have shown Examasymptotically the real parts of the eigenvalues become positive and

point

totically

Pol's

case.

eigenvalues of at the origin stable because the origin is still

The rium

however, the method of computations analysis of the general

a successful

to

depending

equation

is equivalent

a variant of the oscillator of Van der Pol. essential characteristics of the typical a Poincare--Andronovappears through

importantly,

jj

which

the

exhibits

in which a

manner Hopf

concerns

example equation

> 0, is unstable.

that

the

Poincare-Andronov-Hopf

planar

system

bifurcation

satisfies the theorem and thus

(11.22)

of

hypotheses it

must

have

a)))

11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf

347)

Bifurcation

a

@) \\

0)

\037

--------

A)

( a))

a)

;))

---------A)

( b))

a)

.. ....... ... ...... ..' ..,... ... ....... ...... .....

I())

J) '(,\037,)

______

---..:::J7\"'\"

A)

(c))

11.3.

Figure

tions F: supercritical;

(a)

funcBifurcation diagrams of Eq. (11.20) for three different 2 2 - r 2 is F(A, r ) == A is degenerate; (b) for F(A, r ) == A and (c) for F(A, r 2 ) == _(r 2 - C)2 + c 2 + A is subcritical.) for

periodic orbit near

the

11.4. To gain insight into detailed

computations

origin

the

for

some

dynamics

which are also

small values of of Eq. (11.22), indicative

Using polar coordinates and the transformation previous section, we will show below that,

of

the

theory

as the

A,

as

let us

seen

general presented

eigenvalues

in Figure some

perform

situation. in the cross

the)))

348

Presence

In the

11:

Chapter

=

For further

-

[r(t)

on

information

h(t)] x

-

[1

. r(t)-h\037t)

k(t)) ]

r(t)

see Sanchez [1982].)

harvesting,

periodic

Eigenvalues)

Imaginary

Purely

of

A = -0.1)

4.5. We

Stability

in

remarked

have

Eq. (4.4)

Solutions Section 4.2 that a I-periodic

of Periodic

11. Furthermore, fixed point Xo.

a fixed

to

corresponds

point

the stability properties The Poincare map is

also monotone nondecreasing; it follows from Theorem

of

cp

solution cp(t, 0, = Xo, of the Poincare are the same as those

differentiable

II' (xo)

thus,

3.8 that

II(xo)

Xo,

cp is

for

asymptotically to use that

map of

the

and Appendix) all Xo. Consequently, stable if II' (:fo) < 1, the

(see

> 0

xo) of

this result one would to which is a difficult map object A = 0.0) the solution of is available. To circumvent unless Eq. (4.4) compute general in this section we derive for the derivative a formula of the this difficulty, in of solution terms the and the vector Poincare only I-periodic map cp In doing so, we will also discover some other properties of field f (t, x). which are of independent differential interest. equations and

need

x)

If

4.20.

Lemma f(t,

It may

> 1. ifII'(xo) formula for an explicit

unstable

with

cp(O,

0, xo) =

initial-value

following

0,

cp(t,

0, xo))

cp(t,

(t,

differential

a linear

for

z,) = A 0.1)

equation:) =

z(O)

(4.15

1,)

))

is,)

8cp

axo Proof.

then

Xo,

\037\037

that

solution of a i-periodic equation x = is the solution of the 8cp(t, 0, xo)/8xo

is the

xo)

problem

i =

appear

Poincare

the

The

solution

(t, 0, xo) = cp( t,

0, xo)

cp(t, 0, xo)

both sides

Differentiating

chain rule,

8 Xo

Xo

[ 10

ax

is given +

this

xo))ds ] .

( 4.16))

by)

I(s,

it

(s, cp(s, 0,

equation

cp(s,

0,

ds.)

xo))

with respect

to

A = 0.3

Xo,

and

using

the

yields)

Figure

_8cp

of

=

{t 8 f

exp

11.4.

Poincare-Andronov-Hopf t

(t, 0, xo) = 1 +

_8f

i

0

8x

in

bifurcation

_

8cp

(s,

cp(s,

0, xo))

8Xo))) (s,

0,

Van der

xo) ds.

Pol.)))

11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf axis, the origin gives specifically, we will demonstrate imaginary

nontrivial

r

orbit

periodic

its

up

that, the

A near

which

origin

Let

is

orbit.

periodic

asymptotically

orbitally

there

Then

XiX2.

More

0, there is a unique

A >

small

each

Moreover, r A ---+ 0 as A ---+ O. F1(A, x) = 0 and F 2 (A, x) = 2AX2

stable.

to a

stability

for

349)

Bifurcation

is a

AO

>

0

such that)

IIDF(A, 0) II the conditions (11.4) for satisfied as long as I A I

thus

and

dr / dO

are

Pol, Eq.

(11.9) is given

to a

reduction


function, F

: JR

the normalization

x

---+

JR2

=

X2

DxF(,x,

0,)

=

,xXI +

=

-Xl

approximate

amplitude

X2

+

For this normalized system, be reformulated in the following as the

(,x, x)

JR2;

the system of differential Xl

have

above

processes

setting.

following

Let

been F be a

3,)

F(,x, 0) consider

to the

attention

satisfying)

and

\037).)

of

,xX2

+

\037

0)

x),)

F(,x,

=

29 ))

equations) FI(,x, +

Xl, X2)

F 2 (,x, Xl,

(11.30)) X2).)

the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf way,

( 11.

0,)

where

a periodic

the variable

theorem

a should

be

can viewed

solution:

11.15. For the system there are constants ao > 0, (11.30), 1 real-valued 0 functions of aofreal 00 ) by the unit circle an w-limit on is 0, and point ,x*(a), T*(a) (ro,variable (1, 0) and a T*(a)-periodic vector-valued function with = the a, in be Definition 7.10 to the following + x*(t, a) sequence simply taking 0) 21rj. (0 0 tj tj a < ao,))) set of any initial value for the 0 < w-limit properties: with ro -=I 0 is the unit))) Consequently, Theorem ,xo

>

> 0, 8 0point

352

Presence

In the

11:

Chapter

of

Eigenvalues)

Imaginary

Purely

*

*

. A ( 0) == 0, T* ( 0) == 211\", II x (0, a) II == a. . The function x*(t, a) is a solution of the system (11.30) with value A == A * (a) and its components are given rameter by) x \037( t, a)

a)

x;(t, For

.


Proof.

0,

In this

proof of the

and

proof we

previous

will

continue

theorem.

For

to use the notation developed fixed a, let \037= ,\\*(0,). Using the

in

the

solution)

0 r(X,

9, a)

=

e'\037oa +

1

eX(O-s) P(X,

r(X,

s,

a),

s)

ds)

(11.35))))

354

In the

11:

Chapter

Presence

Eigenvalues)

Imaginary

Purely

of

a)

a)

\\ \\

,

\ A)

A)

Subcritical)

Supercritical)

Figure

11.6.

ra agram: if d'\\*(a)jda

scalar

of the

the

Two

Poincare

is

amplitude a

from the

a

di-

bifurcation

> 0, and

if d'\\*(a)jda

stable

type of

Stability

'\\*(a).

inferred

unstable

O.)

differential IT of

map

to

it is convenient

equation (11.31), we Eq. (11.31) at a == a. the

consider

e

type

stability

q(a).

the

of

27rX

[IT' (a)

periodic

determine

now

will

We

will

compute

For

-

1]

the derivative

computational

defined

q(a)

quantity

q(a)

the so that the sign of

function

be

can

asymptotically

orbitally


; +

- e- 27rA

,X ==

*

(a))

a +

from Eq.

'x*(a), {27r

(X, r(X,

e-

A

*

(11.34) *

(a)s

P(.x

Jo

s, a), s) (X, \037:

ds.

(11.36)

have)

we

(a), r(.x

s, a)

*

(a), s, a), s) ds =

O.

(11.37)

To

make

the notation

venient to

rewrite

this

equation

- e(1

in

manageable

subsequent

computations,

it is

con-

as)

27rA

*(a))

a +

ag(.x*(a), a)

=

0)

(11.38))))

11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf or)

- e-

1

27r A

*

(a)

*

+ 9 ()..

( a ),

== o.)

a)

355)

Bifurcation

(11.39))

The existence of such a function 9 follows from Eq. (11.32). Now, differento a and then putting a == a yields) tiating Eq. (11.38)with respect

(

1-

e-

27rX

+ a\037 )

-

d +

da

(ag().., a))

and the

the first

Combining

junction with

in conjunction with

I

-

As

a result,

Poincare

II' (ii) differentiate

-(A

for

Thus,

+

ii, we

with

of the

(11.40

ii).)

to

respect

=

(X,

::..*

[27re-

small

sufficiently

(X,

8a

27fX

terms

- 8 g

Eq. (11.39)

*)' (ii)

fourth

derivative

the

for

iie- 27f A

1 =

-

the

and

O.)

formula

following

above in con-

equation

second

=

ii)

(X,

\037\037

the

we obtain

== o.) I a=a

at)

map:)

Finally,

in the

the

arrive

ii

ii))

(ag()..*(a),

\"terms\"

Eq. (11.39), we

_ I a=a)

)

da

third

q(ii)

(a)

d

+

a=a

*

27rA

and combining

(11.36),

Eq.

(

da

1 _ e-

a and

== a:)

ii).)

(X,

\037\037

ii)]

put a

))

have)

=

sign [-(A*)'(ii)]

(X,

sign

\037\037

(11.41))

ii).)

c(s)ds

==

O.

and c are given In fact, the solutions of /3 fJo + f; c(s)ds bythe(3(t) desired conclusion) Now, from the relations (11.40) and (11.41), t+ 1 == == == if if if 0 and + 1) However, only c(s)ds (3(t (3(t) ft f01 c(s)ds. , * we chose + == sign(constant) fJ(t) == [II' ( a) 1] [c(s) [- ( )..co] ) ds,( a) ])that is, (3(t) satisfies the f; sign ==

==

differential

is self-evident.

equation)

0

/3

== c

-

( t)

(5.9))

co,)

As this somewhat should reexamine equathe differential choose then a reward proof,satisfying you So, we intricate {3 I-periodic. (3(t) is of in this In the earlier bifurcation == chapter. particular, you should also require that O. tion (5.9). We maydiagrams f01 {3(s)ds differentiate the bifurcation curve the of oscillator of Van der Pol.)the cochosen as above. To simplify now that {3 has (11.27) been Suppose efficient

of the

Exercises)

satisfying

fo1

w

,( s)

11.12. Rayleigh's equation: >.. is a small scalar

3

in Eq.

term

ds

==

The

0,

from

(5.8),

second-order

parameter,

we

can

the differential

1

determine

equation)

the function

,

(t

),

leC/'O)

equation jj + y3 - 2>\"y + y = 0, where - theory of sound and is known))) /1,) (5.10))))

m(t) the

arises == in

356

as

Convert this into a

equation.

Rayleigh's

gate the

Poincare-Andronov-Hopf

stability

type

Answer: The 11.13.

Presence of Purely Imaginary

In the

11:

Chapter

Discuss the

the

of

of the

orbits

\\ = AXI

.

X2 =

11.14.

origin for

the

is

curve

bifurcation

.

O.

investi-

and

system

A =

about

the

Determine

orbit.

approximate

Xl

near

first-order

bifurcation

periodic

periodic

Eigenvalues)

2

A =

a /8 + O(a

3

).

system)

+

X2

+ XlX2

- Xl2

\\ AX2

-Xl +

2

+ aXlX2 2 X2)

+

small.

IAI

Discuss the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf of the system)

near

bifurcation

the

origin for

A near

zero

Xl

this

In

11.15.

example,

=

Xl +

X2 =

(A

you

should

Normal

Form.)

Center

in Hamiltonian

-

X2

2)Xl + first

-

(A

1)x2

x\037

-

X\037X2.)

the linear part

put

A =

for

0 in Jordan

function

a Hamiltonian

Consider

systems:

-

of

the

form)

H(Xl, as

IX 21

lXII,

\037 0,

=

X2)

and

\037

(x\037

+ x\037) + 0

((Ixli +

IX21)2)

the Hamiltonian system)

{3 1= O. Then,

8H

.

Xl=-

8X2

.

X2 =

-- 8H 8Xl)

at the origin.

a center

has

Hopf

Consider

point

at

If by

Co

=

is easy

This

to

show

of a center

existence

using from

the method the

Poincare-

of Liapunov Andronov-

theorem.

bifurcation

Hint:

the one-parameter

Xo; hence, the

Eq. (4.4), is (ii)

the

Establish

functions.

unstable

0, then

Xl

= A

X2

derivative

8H

in Eq. (5.6). Thus, the 8H

as

+

8X2 periodic

8Xl

corresponding

if Co =1= O. =

the third

system)

solution

8H _ at the fixed 8X2of Il 8Xl)

fixed

cp(t, 0, xo) of

8H

A

point

Xo

is given

N ow1 verify that this system a neighborhood of zero. satisfies the = II/\" (xo) theorem dt of the bifurcation and there 6d o, are no periodic orbits d(t) that 61 for A = O. For further on this approach, see Schmidt information except and his in Marsden and McCracken in as the where is fixed at the exposition [1978] d(t) Thus, Eq. (5.6). point[1976].))) Xo, hence, of is if solution unstable 0, xo) periodic Eq. (4.4), corresponding cp(t, for

A in

hypotheses

do

> 0

and asymptotically stable if

do


4, satisfying Moreover, assume

the transformation the

equation

form)

C +

[ ,8(0)

theory outlined

differential

scalar

corresponding

p-

.\\)

(11.47))

x),)

F(.\\,

sufficiently

has

2

(

Ok

using

coefficients

+ 0

equation:)

x+

a(.\\) )

-(3(,X))

parameter,

constant

differential

planar

following

p

0(.\\)

]

3

+ O(p

4 ),)

(11.48))

the form of the a'(O) = (dajd'x)(O) and c is some constant. From Poincare map of Eq. (11.48) and Theorem 11.16, the following result on the a is the approximate bifurcation curve 'x(a), where amplitude, ofEq. (11.47)

where

should

be evident:)))

11.3. Computing a)

359)

Curves

Bifurcation

a)

-

.....

\"

\

-------

-------

A)

> 0

(X' (0)

(x'

(0) >

c>O)

A)

0

c 0 and 8 > 0 such that for o < IAI < Ao, and xO E L8, there is a first time T(A, xO) > 0 such that the)))

satisfying solutions

F(O, x)

of Eq.

12.3. Local solution cp(A,

xO) of Eq. (12.17) the Poincare map

t,

define

fore,

we

cp(A,

T(A,

xO),

satisfies

xO), xO) E Le. Thereas II(A, xO) = parameters

T(A,

cp(A, on

depending

Orbits

of Periodic

Bifurcations

into Le. The Poincare map II(A, xO) will that II(O, XO) was in Theorem 12.13. Of near ro correspond to fixed points of II(A, xO). in Section results 3.3 on fixed of monotone points to the Poincare map II(A, For if ro is example, xO). each A with there is a unique periodic orbit IAI small,

xO) mapping L8 for the same reason

be monotone orbits course, periodic Now, the general maps can be applied hyperbolic, then for

r 0 and r A is also hyperbolic. When ro is nonhyperbolic, the bifurcations near the periodic orbit ro are determined from the bifurcations of the Poincare map II(A, xO). The bifurcation of the nonhyperexample below corresponds to a saddle-node bolic fixed of the Poincare map at, for instance, xO = (1, 0). point r

A near

Example 12.20. the planar system Xl = X2

==

A

is a

-

-

X2 cos X2

sin

A +

A +

of periodic

-

COS A

-

(1

(1

x\037

x\037

-

x\037)2(Xl

sin

x\037)2(Xl

r

== r

iJ =

[ (1

- r 2 ) 2 cos

- r (1

2

2

)

-

A

an

r sin

sin

sin A + cos

X2

sin

X2 COS

A)

A),)

is the

system

field of

form)

-

Consider

orbits:

(12.18)) A +

real small

vector

the

of

the

has

Xl COS A

A

bifurcation

parameter. This one-parameter Example 12.16 through In polar coordinates Xl == r cos 0 and X2 =

where

tion

-Xl sin

saddle-node

A

A

rota-

angle

A.

0, the

system (12.18)

] (12.19))

A.

the first equation is independent of 0, it is easy to see that, Since in the radial direction, the system above a saddle-node bifurcation as undergoes the parameter A passes zero. Indeed, if A > 0, and is sufficiently through then the system close to zero, an unstable orbits; (12.19) has two periodic

periodic

orbit) X\037+

which

is a

circle of

=

x\037

=

x\037

which is a circle of radius less than of course, is Example 12.9 which orbits as

t

orbit

at

x\037 +x\037

= 1. If

and all the -+ +00; see Figure 12.7. because

v tanA,

radius greater than 1, and x\037 +

periodic

1 +

r > 0

A


.o)

two limit A quadmtic system with a on parameter depending system

12.10.

= P(Xl, = X2 P(Xl, Xl

where

P( Xl, X2)

and Q( Xl,

=

X2)

Q(Xl,

A

-

cos

X2)

sin A +

are

Q(Xl,

X2)

sin

quadratic

planar

A

Q(Xl, X2) COS

given

A,)

by)

169(Xl - 1)2 - 1)2 144(Xl

X2) =

P(Xl,

cycles: A:)

X2)

X2)

Consider the

-

16(X2

-

9(X2

1)2

1)2

- 153, 135.)

the vector field. For A = 0.8, there is a that the parameter A rotates limit cycle surrounding the equilibrium point (0, 0), and an unstable limit around the point cycles equilibrium cycle (2, 2). Locate these limit the unstable run the solutions one, you should using a computer. To find size. This system is contained in the library backward with a negative step under the name hilbert2.) of PHASER Notice

stable

In the search orbits

periodic

for

it is

orbits,

periodic

important to understand

how

periodic

famous In the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf bifurcation. we will illustrate how a brief section, which consists of one example, can bifurcate from or be absorbed by a homo clinic loop. orbit can be created or

instance this

Bifurcation)

A Homoclinic

12.4.

this

of

is, of course,

12.21.

Example

The most

bifurcations.

through

destroyed

orbit

Periodic

a homoclinic

from

loop:

the

Consider

system)

planar

= 2X2 . X2 = 2 Xl Xl

- 3Xl 2

3 X2 ( Xl

-

-

2 Xl

+

2 X2

( 12.20)) C ) ,)

that when c = 0, these reequations 12.4 with A = -1: there is a homoclinic the origin and attracts from as seen in Figure 12.8b. within, loop through We now the phase portrait of this system for small nonzero analyze For all values of c, there are two values of the c near zero. parameter a saddle, and the other at points; the one at (0, 0) is always equilibrium c is

where

duce to

0)

(2/3,

To

consider

a

scalar

parameter.

the special

case

is unstable analyze

the

the

Notice

of Example

(source) when c > of the phase

details

-4/27. portraits

of Eq.

function)

V(Xl,

X2)

=

xr

-

xI +

x\037)))

(12.20) further,

we

385)

386

Chapter

12:

Periodic

Orbits)

c =

-0.

1)

c=O)

c = 0.1) Figure

Wben loop; nearby.)))

12.8. A bomoclinic bifurcation in Example 12.21 near c == O. c < 0, tbere is a periodic orbit; at c == 0, it becomes tbe bomoclinic is broken and tbere is no periodic for c > 0, tbe bomoclinic orbit loop

12.4. A and compute its

derivative

X2)

V(XI,

For

the

==

x\037

loop

no periodic

in

illustrated

12.8.

Figure

X2

the

0,

-

(12.20) to

periodic

This

obtain)

c).)

For c > 0, the

orbit.

387)

Bifurcation

one can see that there lying on the curve x\037

orbit

periodic

Xl > o. As c ---+ the origin. through

and also there is

+

Principle,

with

0,

homoclinic

broken

lnvariance

stable

asymptotically

orbitally - c

xI +

322 - 2X 2(XI Xl

==

< 0, using the

< c

-4/27

is an

of Eq.

solutions

the

along

.

Homoclinic

orbit approaches homoclinic

loop

is

of bifurcations is

sequence

of a (unique) loop is broken, the birth periodic under fairly general assumptions; however, we refrain here from such a formulation. Homoclinic loops play a significant in Chapter role in bifurcation 13 theory and we will encounter them again when we consider planar flows at large.)

a homoclinic

When

orbit

be

can

established

Exercises)

\"y>.)

12.11. Show

in Example

that

12.21 the

orbit

periodic

and 12.12.

the

Consider

planar

is

at the

from

decreased

at

(2/3, 0) value

parameter

0 towards

undergoes

c =

-4/27.

-4/27, the

the homo clinic loop gradually becomes smaller the equilibrium point at (2/3, 0).

off

springing

disappears

finally

parameter c

as the

that

Observe

point

equilibrium

bifurcation

a Poincare-Andronov-Hopf

into

system) Xl

=

X2 =

X2 Xl

-

x\037 +

AX2 +

aXlX2.)

of a at a positive the origin is a saddle point. Fix the value on PHASER to convince that there is a experiment yourself negative value of A at which the system has a homo clinic loop. Now, change the homo clinic loop, and search for the unique periodic A a little to break in the proximity of the original orbit homoclinic loop.)

that

Observe

value.

Then

Bibliographical The

details

Notes)

of the central result

@\\0) of

Poincare

and

Bendixson

can be found

in many sources; for example, Hale [1980], Hartman [1964], and Hirsch see, of the Jordan and Smale [1974]. A proof Curve Theorem is in Newman theory for two[1953]. A generalization of the Poincare-Bendixson in Schwartz dimensional surfaces other than the plane are given [1963]. A comprehensive reference on the search for limit cycles, Dulac funcis Yeh of the existence of a on the The etc., tions, plane proof [1986]. of Van der Pol is from Ye [1986] and that of its limit cycle of the oscillator is from Coppel [1965].))) hyperbolicity

388

Chapter

12:

Periodic

The sixteenth

Orbits) problem

of the few unanswered in the collection by absent

one

has a

of Hilbert

questions

of

his

fascinating history and

list.

Curiously,

remains

number sixteen

is

Browder [1976] on the progress of Hilbert's probresult on the sixteenth problem was the \"theorem\" lems. The first major of the total number of limit cycles of Dulac [1923] asserting the finiteness a gap in his \"proof\" of a general vector field. planar Later, polynomial the theorem it turned out to be nonrectifiable. was discovered; Recently, for with of Dulac has been proved by Bamon quadratic polynomials, [1987] For general major contributions by II'yaschenko. polynomials, there are of Dulac's theorem in Ecalle et al. [1987] and II'yaschenko announcements A bound for the number of limit cycles, however, still appears to [1990]. been false be even for quadratic have distant, polynomials, although there is that there can be at most four proofs and claims. The general feeling and there is such an example limit cycles in the case of quadratics, by Wang and also by Shi [1980] stored in the library of PHASER under the name For and on vector consult Chicone fields, hilbert4. easy reading quadratic Tian [1982]. the bifurcations of a homoclinic One important loop question regarding is the number of resulting periodic orbits. Under fairly general assumptions, the that the trace of the linearization at the most notably requirement of the from zero, one can establish the uniqueness saddle point be different it is possible periodic orbit. If the trace condition is not met, bifurcating to obtain any number of periodic orbits. Bifurcation of periodic orbits of in great detail in Andronov et al. [1973],including planar systems is covered of homoclinic loops. Do not miss especially the last results on bifurcations are presented. Some chapter of this book, where many specific examples in higher dimensions are of these topics and the role of planar bifurcations in Chow and Hale contained [1982].)))

13)

All

Planar

Things

Considered)

In

the

numerous

encountered

chapters

that have

come

before,

we have

for many bifurcations, and equilibria periodic orbits, Poincare-Andronov-Hopf, and breaking homo clinic and saddle connections. It loops is natural to ponder if ever, we will stop adding when, to the list and produce a complete catalog of all possible In this chapter, we indeed bifurcations. such a list for \"generic\" provide bifurcations of planar vector fields on one parameter. However, depending due to the overwhelming difficulty of the subject matter, our exposition, To circumvent certain technical while precise, is devoid of verifications. we confine our attention to a closed and bounded complications, region of and in such a region characterize the plane, the stable vecstructurally tor fields. To motivate this confinement, we then make a short digression to describe a class of vector fields whose dynamics are naturally confined to a bounded region-dissipative systems. we explore the geomeNext, try of sets of mildly structurally unstable vector fields-first-order structural the sets of such vector fields forming instability. By determining all in the set of vector arrive at a list of onewe fields, hypersurfaces bifurcations. You will that some notice parameter \"generic\" undoubtedly of the familiar bifurcations are absent from the list. We provide an explanation for this as well, in terms of symmetries. We end the chapter with a glimpse into fields.))) the intricate bifurcations of two- parameter vector such

as

saddle-node

390

13.1. On

All Planar

13:

Chapter

Things

occasions

previous

many

small

under

preserved

cast, in the spirit of tive dynamics in a general of those planar vector fields

field.

fields we

Here,

2.6, this important topic of qualitaand give a complete characterization setting, for which the orbit structure remains quali-

small

under

unchanged

of vector

properties

of the vector

perturbations

Section

finally

tatively

Vector Fields we have considered

Stable

Structurally

that are

Considered)

stable vector

perturbations-structurally

fields.

Our first-order task is to introduce a suitable distance on the space of planar vector fields so as to make the notion of \"small perturbation\" of the unboundedness of the plane, this of a vector field Because precise. turns out to be more difficult than it first appears. To circumvent this and of vector other difficulties, we will restrict our comparison fields to some and bounded-subset of the plane. compact--closed Let V be a compact a smooth subset of ]R2 with boundary and let k fields defined on V and pointing inwards at Xk(V) denote the C vector the boundary a neighborhood of a vector field in points of V. To specify one fixes a norm on ]R2 and defines the CO distance of two vector Xk(V), fields f and g in Xk(V) to be)

-

Ilf

However, instance,

the

distance

CO

two vector

=

gilD

sup { xEV)

of hyperbolic equilibria; see Figure we introduce the C 1 distance derivatives to be close at all

In

this

norm on the

set

gill =

-

]R4.

With

of all vector

The

resulting We also

ness

conditions

sup xEV)

fields

topology will have

g

-

gllr =

use

details.)))

the C r

For

large.'

number

same

situa-

undesirable

the functions as

well

g(x)ll,

as

linear the

define

employ

-

IIDf(x)

Dg(x)11

functions and use any 6 neighborhood of f to be < 6.

k > 1, satisfying the C 1 topology.

Ilf

distances

by imposing

cr

gilt

close-

{ IIDif(x)

-

Dig(x)11

},

O\037i\037r)

set

as

}.

derivatives,)

sup

topology on the

'too the

of V:)

in Xk(V), with is called (V)

occasion to

that are

requiring

on X k

xEV;

and

-

{ Ilf(x)

on higher-order IIf

by points

}.

not have To avoid this

13.1.

we view the derivatives the C 1 distance, we

definition,

g(x)11

yields neighborhoods are CO close may

that

fields

tion, their

Ilf

-

Ilf(x)

of vector

fields Xk(V);

we omit further

13.1. Structurally

Figure 13.1. not

Cl

in the

Two

Fields

Vector

that are close in the CO topology different number of zeros.)

functions

(scalar) may

topology

Stable

have

but

To our notation, in this chapter Xk(V) will summarize denote the k k > 1, defined on a compact subset V of the space of C vector fields, and pointing inwards at the boundary of V. The topology on plane points will at be least the C 1 topology. the infinite dimensional space Xk(V) These technical conventions we now return to dynamics.) attended, Definition

equivalent orbits of

13.1. Two vector fields f and g are said to be if there is a homeomorphism h : V --+ V such that

f onto

the orbits

x topologically

\037

= equivalent f(x)

to f.)-(3

f

Nf

E off Xl

h

maps

the sense of direction of have the following form with k > 1, is structurally Xk(V), in Xk(V) such that any g E 91 (Xl, X2)

of g and preserves f to assume may

the origin:) 13.2. A vector field Definition if there is a neighborhood stable

topologically

.

+

the

time.) near

N f

is

(15.24))

) ( x2 ) ( 92 ( Xl, X2)) ) is admittedly a bit amalgamated; we consider two vecThis definition in polar coefficient a of the cubic term in Eq. (15.23) Then tor fieldsthe tomagic be \"near\" if their values as well as their derivatives are close, is equal to) coordinates while to compare their phase portraits up to only topological settling equivto As we pointed out in Section alence without reference differentiability. 2J-L)p2 (1 2 2 1 a=Re and not is the (15.25)) natudifferentiable '1160 +1'021 -Re(il61),) 8.3, topological equivalence equivalence +\"21'111 I-J1[ ] It is a fact remarkable ral concept even when linear systems. comparing in a complete characthat these perplexing choices of comparisons result where) of the structurally terization stable vector fields in a bounded region of the us recall+ 2(g2)XIX2 we the result,- let several definitions from the Before 60 state (gl)x2x2 plane. =\037 a

(;)

{(gl)XIXl

past.)

+ i

[(g2)XIXl

-

(g2)X2X2

-

2(gl

)XIX2]

},

point x of a vector field f is called hy61 with nonzero if the linear real has eigenvalues vector (gdxlxl field + Df(x) (gdx2x2 perbolic =\037{ negative parts. In the case when one eigenvalue is positive and the other + (g2)X2 X 2] + i [(g2)XIXl called a saddle the equilibrium point.))) point x is },))) Definition

13.3.

An equilibrium

391)

392

All Planar

13:

Chapter

tive of the

Poincare

sets

orbit

if its limit

the

An orbit is called a

are saddle

limit

these

With

points.

dynamical structural

on

a compact region V 13.6.

Theorem

with

k

>

of

deriva-

the

saddle

distinct

Q- and wa heteroclinic and homoclinic if if its

connection

saddle

is called points,

point.)

concepts at our disposal, for planar vector stability

the

now state

can

we

fields

pointing

into

plane.

k A C vector field f E (Structurally stable vector fields) V stable on if and only if f has the 1, is structurally

properties:

following

(i) all equilibrium points are hyperbolic; (ii) all periodic orbits are hyperbolic; there are no saddle connections. (iii) The

from our ciency,

if the

hyperbolic

connection

saddle

A

Q- and w-limit sets are sets are the same saddle

main theorem

Xk(V),

orbit ,(xO) is called IT' (xO) =1= 1.

satisfies

map

13.5.

Definition

Considered)

A periodic

13.4.

Definition

Things

necessity

of these

previous

examples

however,

is

conditions

0 for

structural

are self-evident

stability

study of local bifurcations. establish and thus we say

in the to

difficult

The

no

more

suffiabout

it.)

Despite

the mathematical

general, easy to stable.

if

determine

For example, it is

compact region, and here is one ertheless,

periodic success

of

elegance

a specific

difficult

orbits story

to

the

theorem

above, it is not, in

planar vector field if a vector field verify

are based

is

structurally into

points

nearly impossible to on our earlier work.)

locate.

a

Nev-

13.7. Van der Pol is structurally stable: In the previous Example chapter, while proving the existence of a periodic orbit of the equation of Van der Pol, we constructed a compact set, say, V, into which all orbits eventually entered. The boundary of this set had a couple of corners, but it is possible to modify the set a bit to smooth out the while ensuring that boundary the flow still points inward at the boundary. this set there is an Inside orbit both of which we showed to be equilibrium point and a periodic there is no saddle connection the w-limit because Moreover, hyperbolic. set of any orbit except the origin is the periodic orbit. Now that we have all of the theorem above, verified that the the hypotheses we conclude of Van der Pol is stable within the class equation structurally Xk(V), the set of C k vector fields pointing inward into V and endowed with the C k topology.

0)

Despite the ation is less of a

to

be

structurally

difficulties concern

stable.)))

posed as

\"most\"

by specific

planar

vector fields, vector fields

the in

X

k

general

situ-

(V) turn out

13.1. Structurally Theorem

13.8.

consisting

of

Xk(V), that

structural

stability)

stable vector fields is structurally structural is a stability generic property.

is,

of this

In light nore

of

(Genericity

the

theorem, it

perturbation

will

to be

appears

usually

(;

convenient to

an

because

393)

The subset of Xk(V) and dense in open

practically

planar vector fields a structurally turn

unstable

structurally

Fields

Vector

Stable

unstable vector

ig-

small

arbitrarily

a

into

field

for a single planar stable one. This is a reasonable structurally strategy if the field on a vector vector field; depends parameter, however, the difas shall we see later in this into ficulties abound, chapter. Before delving of bifurcations, we now make a short diversion and explore the depths the condition we have elected to on our vector fields.) impose boundary Exercises)

,.\037.(;)

13.1. A structurally

stable

that

Show

system:

= 2Xl

Xl .

X2 = -X2

+

- Xl (xi

X2

-

the planar

2

X2

( Xl +

+

system)

x\037)

2 X2) )

all the hypotheses stable by verifying of Theorem 13.6. field is symmetric with respect to the reflection through and There are no periodic disk. inward on a large points enough origin, orbits because there is an invariant line through the origin. Further help is available in Andronov et al. [1973], p. 190. Also, you might like to plot the is structurally

phase 13.2.

of this

portrait

Determine disk

13.3.

vector

The

Hints:

the

13.4. Sketch a flow yet there are Suggestion:

consists

13.5. Structural may have Suggestion: previous

on

of the vector field in the previous Can you compute its C l norm?

a bounded

You exercise

domain such that of hyperbolic orbits

periodic points

and

and

finiteness:

does

proves

up

a

the

set

topology'

in,

on

topology

\"Whitney

not

the

all

orbits.

on an

connecting

If f E X k

are hyperbolic,

equilibria

periodic

accumulate

orbits

number of equilibrium must exclude, among other

a finite

only

look

number

Make the of equilibrium stability

to introduce

set,

problem on the

[1976].

infinite

an

PHASER.

using

defined

Hirsch

example,

system

If you want to know how on a noncompact

Why compact? of vector fields for

norm

CO

chosen.

have

you

planar

invariant

set

which

them. stable then f and periodic orbits. that the situation in the

is structurally

points things,

occur.)))

stability

of the equilibrium point at

the

origin.

to.

Definition

This definition can be rephrased is a source; orbit every and remains away. For our purposes of

properties

dissipative

vector

field

will

We

==

f(x)

V.

The

then there exists a set V the of V the on boundary

that

0, then

If V\"(O)

O.

Since

ellipses.

vector

(Xl) > o.

To establish

the

as

function

< 0;

ifV\"(XI)

eigenvalues, one being point.

and

centers.)

to

14.2. Suppose that Xl is a critical point of a potential x = (Xl, 0) is an equilibrium point of the conservative (14.1). Then

field

can

types

points

that

so

only

correspond-

Lemma V

=I O.

system (14.1)

equilibria

correspond

a

called

point if and

equilibrium

are isolated.

points

V\"

conservative

of the is an

0)

isolated maxima

isolated minima correspond

nondegenerate

points

equilibrium

point is if

415)

Systems

C l function

of the

point

a critical

V at

called

is

xl-axis

easily

critical

of

value

and that a point (Xl, a critical point of the potential

the

Xl

called a

Xl is

point

if V'

IR

It is evident on

lie

A

(Xl) = o. The value. A critical point Xl

: IR

V

Conservative

equilibrium

points and orbits

Theorem orbit and

connecting them.

The)))

416

tems, we now present phase portraits from

their

In

the

same

potential

I)

conservative to determine

systheir

functions.

potential

14.4. The Fish:

Example

x.

of identifying a class of well-behaved several examples and indicate how

intent

the

to

correspond

set of y is

w-limit

the

that

implies

Systems)

saddle points

no two

that

hypothesis

energy value With

and Gradient

Conservative

14:

Chapter

we discussed

7.27,

Example

= X2 . X2 = Xl

the

system)

Xl

This

with the

is conservative

system

V( Xl ) The

critical

minimum, The point

at

point

and thus

the

2 Xl')

function)

potential

I

X

2 I+3

I

3 X I')

the potential is a center

1 of

=

Xl

=-2

-

is a nondegenerate flow. corresponding maximum of the potential function and point (0, 0) of the flow is a saddle point. function

(1, 0)

point

for

the

= 0 is a Xl nondegenerate thus the corresponding equilibrium for the level curves of the energy we Moreover, using the formula function, observe that the right of the unstable manifold of the saddle piece point at the origin is a homoclinic the center. Since there are no loop encircling other inside the loop, all orbits inside the loop are periodic. We equilibria have drawn in Figure 14.1 the graph of the potential function as well as the phase portrait of the Fish. I)

14.5.

Example

Duffing's

equation: V( Xl )

and

the

=

conservative

corresponding

Xl

. X2

Consider the I 2 -2 x I

function)

potential

I 4 4 x I)

+

system)

=

X2

=

Xl

-

3 Xl')

has nondegenerate minima at -1 and 1; thus the at (-1, 0) and (1, 0). Also, there is a nondegenerate maximum at the origin and thus a saddle point at (0, 0). Moreover, using the formula we observe that (14.2) for the level curves of the total energy, the unstable manifold of the saddle The full flow is point is a figure eight. shown in Figure 14.2: inside each there is a center, loop of the figure eight and outside the figure all orbits are periodic. I) eight, The

function

potential field

vector

We

now

has

centers

a pair of

present

unstable manifolds

of

saddle

examples to points in the

the

illustrate flows

of

decisive

conservative

role of

the

systems.)))

14.1. Second-order

Figure portrait

Example

14.1. The potential of the fish in Example 14.6.

function

the

Consider the

corresponding

=

=

(

-\037

\037, 0)

and

manifolds

has

a center

x\037/3

to

the

and

phase

I

2

3x I

+

I 3 gX I

- I x4 4 I)

system)

X2

X2 = -Xl

The vector field minimum of the and

+

function)

potential

conservative Xl

= -xi/2

Systems

14.4.)

V( Xl ) and

V(Xl)

Conservative

(1 -

at (0, 0)

potential function

at

XI)(\037

+

corresponding

o. Also,

Xl).

there are

two

nondegenerate saddle

points,

critical points at corresponding to the nondegenerate 1. To complete the phase we need to look at the unstable portrait, of the saddle points. Since V (1) > V ( manifold))) ), the unstable \037

(1, 0),

417)

418

and Gradient

Conservative

14:

Chapter

Then,

multiplying

(8.15),

we

both sides of this

Now, we multiply Eq. (8.16) from Eq. (8.17) to obtain)

that

we assumed

that

vectors yl

CI

-

Al

0; and

y2

and

A2

corresponding

formation

and

A

by

A2) yl

=1= 0,

DufIing matrix multiplications

yl

and

is not C2

distinct

V(Xl) in

the resulting

==

Example

suffice

the

==

O.

zero

+ -xI/2 14.5.) to exhibit

Since

p-I,

and

theJ=(\037l potential

Consider

P is invertible, we obtain the

Thus,

are

xf/4 and

corresponding

pose

that

Equal A is

linearly

phase

the desired

trans-

we

if desired

V(

(

-

of

\037, 0)

(-

on the

\037, 0)

phase

is a

portrait

\0372)' function)

both sides of this multiply 2 2 - I 3 - I 4 == X X I) Xlsimilarity) ) 3 I 4 gX I

matrix

equation

by

1 conservative = AP = J system) p(\037l

(ii)

the eigen-

of P:)

property

the

this

vector,

eigenvalues

saddle point (1, 0) is above the unstable manifold of == == AP == (AylIAy2) PJ,) A2y2) (AIyll the upper plane. Also, right piece of the unstable manifold homo clinic loop encircling the center . Now, the rest of the where) can readily be filled in, as shown in Figure 14.3. 14.7.

equation

== o.)

(8.16) yields

function

( 8.17))

of the

Example

relations

using

== O.)

then subtract

to two

independent. of the portrait equation of

Now, routine

-

now Eq.

The potential

14.2.

Figure

==

C2 A 2 y2

+

A2 and

by

CI (AI

implies

equation

obtain)

CIAI yl

Since

Systems)

== X2

\0372)')

Xl eigenvalues: There are two cases to consider. First, sup+ X2 == -Xl (1but there two corresponding a double eigenvalue XI)( \037are Xl)'))) linearly)))

14.1. Second-order

Figure

14.3.

portrait

of Example

The

potential

function

V(Xl)

==

Conservative

-

\037xI +

\037x\037

\037xt

Systems

and

phase

14.6.)

function has two nondegenerate As in the previous example, the potential maxirrla, one at -1 and the other at 1, and one nondegenerate minimum at local phase portraits of the two conservative O. Therefore, systems are similar. This the unstahowever, time, Globally, they are quite different. ble of the saddle point (1, 0) sits below that of (-1' manifold 0) because phase portrait V(l) < V(-1)' We have drawn in Figure 14.4 the complete of this system and its potential function. We will return to this and the example

previous

conservative The

effects on example

in the

systems. behavior

the

flow

illustrates.)))

bifurcations

potential function at

infinity

of

second-order

)

of a of the

following section on

corresponding

conservative

can

have

profound

system, as the following

419)

422

Conservative

14:

Chapter

and Gradient

Systems)

following section. Last, we need to avoid the difficulty as exhibited in one or both directions, by the \037 that be unbounded for and function +00 Xl potential prefer they (14.3), with a function The flow of a conservative and Xl \037 -00. potential system the of the can be constructed from these knowledge properties possessing in the

self-evident

boundedness

with

associated

of the saddle unstable manifolds points. we now identify With these remarks, for which the unstable manifolds functions

a class of the

of

desirable

potential

the

saddles determine

flow.)

conservative

A potential function V is

14.9.

Definition

called

generic

if it

satisfies the

conditions:

following

of V; there are finitely many critical points critical of V is non each point degen erate, that is, V\" (Xl) (ii) critical points Xl; values of V are equal; no two maximum (iii) \037 +00 as that is, V 1S unbounded IXll \037 +00, (iv) IV(Xl)1 (i)

\037 +00

Xl

and

Xl

=1= 0

for

for

all

both

\037 -00.)

makes so desirable and generic potentials in context. For this purthis word generic slight 2 to consider the of all functions. we need 0 However, potential pose, space 2 and brevity, we shall now consider 0 functions for the sake of precision interval. This restriction is necessitated by the diffidefined on a compact on the space of functions defined culty of introducing a reasonable topology the requirement on unbounded sets. On a compact interval, (iv) in Definiirrelevant.) tion 14.9 becomes

us now

Let

justify our

explain what abuse

of the

2 functions defined Theorem 14.10. Let C 2 (I) be the set of real-valued 0 I and having no critical at the end points of on a compact interval points 2 the 0 with the interval. Also, endow this function space topology. Then 2 2 in C (I) has a neighborhood in C (I) such that a given generic potential in of vector field this neighborhood the conservative any potential function is topologically to the vector field of the given generic potential equivalent of generic potentials in C 2 (I) is open and the subset function. Moreover, dense.

0)

refrain from giving a formal of this theorem; however, here proof of the basic ingredients. The first part of this result follows from the Implicit Function Theorem. A small 0 2 perturbation of the origand the type of nondegenerate critical the number points

We are

some

essentially

leaves inal generic

function Moreover, the inequality of the unchanged. remains unaffected. Finally, you must convince yourselves manifolds of the saddle the relative positions of the unstable points also preserved under perturbations. For the second part of the theorem)))

maximum that are

potential

values

Figure 14.5. The bounded phase portrait of Example

The

Both

portraits

lent. The source as x \037 +00. There

potential

potential

functions

potential

phase

of the

importance

pared with the

are

of the of

the

certain

functions

which

14.1. Second-order

Conservative

function

-Xle-

potential

V(Xl)

Systems

X1

and)

14.8.)

potential (14.3) =

V(Xl)

have corresponding

difficulty

noteworthy facilitate

!x\037

a single

the

when com-

self-evident

becomes of

harmonic

linear

oscillator.

nondegenerate minimum, but the are not equivasystems

conservative

is the

common the

of

boundedness

characteristics

analysis

of the

the

potential

of

the

corresponding

(14.3)

foregoing con-

of The most apparent is the nondegeneracy feature of phase portraits. At the critical points for ease of local determination the number of critical First, level, there are three key elements. global the critical values of is finite. Second, points anyone of these potenobservation will become))) of this tial functions are distinct; the importance servative

vector

fields.

421)

422

Conservative

14:

Chapter

and Gradient

Systems)

following section. Last, we need to avoid the difficulty as exhibited in one or both directions, by the \037 that be unbounded for and function +00 Xl potential prefer they (14.3), with a function The flow of a conservative and Xl \037 -00. potential system the of the can be constructed from these knowledge properties possessing in the

self-evident

boundedness

with

associated

of the saddle unstable manifolds points. we now identify With these remarks, for which the unstable manifolds functions

a class of the

of

desirable

potential

the

saddles determine

flow.)

conservative

A potential function V is

14.9.

Definition

called

generic

if it

satisfies the

conditions:

following

of V; there are finitely many critical points critical of V is non each point degen erate, that is, V\" (Xl) (ii) critical points Xl; values of V are equal; no two maximum (iii) \037 +00 as that is, V 1S unbounded IXll \037 +00, (iv) IV(Xl)1 (i)

\037 +00

Xl

and

Xl

=1= 0

for

for

all

both

\037 -00.)

makes so desirable and generic potentials in context. For this purthis word generic slight 2 to consider the of all functions. we need 0 However, potential pose, space 2 and brevity, we shall now consider 0 functions for the sake of precision interval. This restriction is necessitated by the diffidefined on a compact on the space of functions defined culty of introducing a reasonable topology the requirement on unbounded sets. On a compact interval, (iv) in Definiirrelevant.) tion 14.9 becomes

us now

Let

justify our

explain what abuse

of the

2 functions defined Theorem 14.10. Let C 2 (I) be the set of real-valued 0 I and having no critical at the end points of on a compact interval points 2 the 0 with the interval. Also, endow this function space topology. Then 2 2 in C (I) has a neighborhood in C (I) such that a given generic potential in of vector field this neighborhood the conservative any potential function is topologically to the vector field of the given generic potential equivalent of generic potentials in C 2 (I) is open and the subset function. Moreover, dense.

0)

refrain from giving a formal of this theorem; however, here proof of the basic ingredients. The first part of this result follows from the Implicit Function Theorem. A small 0 2 perturbation of the origand the type of nondegenerate critical the number points

We are

some

essentially

leaves inal generic

function Moreover, the inequality of the unchanged. remains unaffected. Finally, you must convince yourselves manifolds of the saddle the relative positions of the unstable points also preserved under perturbations. For the second part of the theorem)))

maximum that are

potential

values

14.1. Second-order on the density the Appendix

of

to

one resorts

potentials

generic

Conservative

\"Sard's

423)

Systems see

Theorem;\"

the theorem above with the structural It is important to contrast stain results the To be a conservative previous chapter. sure, system bility with a generic potential is not always stable because it may structurally in the form have a saddle connection of a homo clinic loop. However, if we allow only conservative perturbations of a conservative system whose a system with potential is generic many critical points, then such finitely in a limited way, remains qualitatively intact. This is structural stability of conservative systems. only in the confines With these remarks, we conclude our study of generic potentials and the possibilities that arise when we encounter a nongeneric consider potential.)

Exercises)

,,\037.o)

14.1. Determine the potential functions of the second-order conservative below. From these functions, construct the phase portraits: (c) x+x-x

=0;

critical

nondegenerate

we

14.4.

of a

points

14.3. A minimum for the potential does function V(Xl) that has a minimum of (Xl,

=0.)

(d) x+x(l-x)(O.l-x)

=0;

14.2. Prove that

3

(b)x+x-x

(a)x+x+x3=0;2

potential

not imply a at Xl and yet

0) in

which all orbits of Eq. (14.1) are the function V (x 1) to be analytic?

require

A maximum for the potential that has a V(Xl) (Xl, 0) is stable. Can this

function

systems

not

does

at

maximum

center: there is

require

the

are

isolated.

a

potential

Find

no

Can

periodic.

imply instability: Xl and yet the

if we

happen

function

neighborhood this happen

Find a

potential

point

equilibrium

function

if

V(Xl)

to be

analytic?

14.5.

Unstable

that

manifolds

\"the unstable

say

flow of a generic about this difficult and portraits from generic

of the

conservative, 2

of

H : JR --t

of

the

prove

function.\" Even if vague problem, use

potential

somewhat

a

to the

result

points determine the

saddle

you

the

are fact

apprehensive draw phase

to

potentials.

flows

sinks

.

q=

8H(q,

. p=-

p)

8p

8H(q,

p)

8q)

is called

effect

structure

area: The result of this problem preserve explains the or sources in the phase of Hamiltonian, hence portraits 1 Recall from Section 7.4 that, for a given 0 function systems. JR, the planar system)

14.6. Hamiltonian absence

and

it all: Formulate

manifolds

a Hamiltonian system with

the

Hamiltonian

function

H.)))

424

that

Show

(a)

and Gradient

Conservative

14:

Chapter

the total

be

Do

the

consider

of a

energy

a region, say, with image of Do under

That

is, consider

the

set

is the

solution

the

equation

of

prove

D(t),

of

D(t)

a

for

Hamiltonian

14.8.

14.9.

the

draw

of a

planar

= { O. Using

for

A =

0, the potential On the other -1).

function

conservative

corresponding

==

X2

(1 - xI)(l +

X2 = -Xl

with

as

A

A +

Xl))

in Figure 14.7. in the dynamics

depicted

There is clearly

that

system)

Xl

changes

Xl)

V(O,

see

we

a bifurcation

of

the

A ==

at

equation

o.

negative values, the homo clinic orbit defined by the unstable manifold of the saddle point at (-1 - A, 0) becomes larger, coinciding of the of the stable and unstable manifold saddle eventually with parts orbits between the two saddle points. heteroclinic point (-1, 0) to form For A -+ 0 from positive values, a phenomenon similar to that for negative A occurs but with the role of the saddle ) points interchanged. As A -+ 0 from

amples

In fact, with two maximal

14.13.

Example

A

two preceding

ex-

families of potential one does not expect vary, to coincide, or to have

only one

to

parameter

values of the potential critical points merge more than two nondegenerate point. In lieu of making this statement precise, we function depending on two parameters.) than

more

the

in

encountered

for one-parameter

situations

typical

represent

functions.

we have

that

bifurcations

The

critical

a degenerate

Consider

potential:

two-parameter

to now

a potential

present

the potential

func-

tion)

V(A, on

depending of

the

for

values

small

Since the can be

the cusp

two

corresponding

real parameters conservative

4J-l3

curve =

2 as

27 A ,

critical

in the

A and

==

X2

X2

==

-A

-

J-l. We

are

now

ixi the bifurcations

analyze

+

x\037)

zero.

the zeros of a cubic In fact, we showed for

J-l )-space

shown in Figure

-

field)

J-lXI

near V

points.

(A,

+ !J-lxi

vector

Xl

of the parameters critical points of

at most three

bifurcation

= AXI

Xl)

J-l,

14.8.)))

the critical

there

polynomial, in

Chapter

points

of

V

2 that is the

14.2. Bifurcations

Figure 14.7. potential corresponding

V(A,

of the

Formation Xl)

phase

==

\037(1 +

portraits

A)xi

heteroclinic kAX\037

are on

the

in

Conservative

orbits in the \037xt

following

with

equal

page.)))

bifurcation

maxima.

Systems

of the

The

429)

430

Chapter

14:

Conservative

and Gmdient

Systems)

\\ \\ \\.)

Figure

14.7

Continued.)))

14.2. Bifurcations

in

Conservative

Systems

p.) 8) A)

c)

A)

3)

c)

If is ('\\,

Bifurcations

14.8.

Figure

AXI +

!J-tXI

in \037xf

J-L) lies

('\\,

a nondegenerate =

the

J-L)

of the

Example

potential

two-parameter

this cusp, there is maximum and the flow

below

only one is just

has

For

the

J-t,

critical

point

a hyperbolic = 0 and it is

the only critical of V is Xl point an unstable equilibrium point. values on the cusp, the potential parameter

(0, 0),

flow

V (A,

Xl)

14.13.)

of V which saddle. For degenerate;

only

function

has

two

maximum, and the other As the parameter values cross into the cusp, the maximum and a nondea critical point splits into degenerate nondegenerate in 14.11. the the as Inside critical points cusp, Example generate minimum, are two nondegenerate maxima and a nondegenerate minimum, but always the flows are not equivalent for all parameter values. Indeed, there are pahave the same maximum values; rameter values at which the two maxima As parameter values such values are exactly the positive parameter J-L-axis. turns into two heteroclinic the orbit homoclinic cross the positive J-L-axis, as in Example 14.12. and then back to a homo orbits clinic orbit, critical points, one of of which is degenerate.

another dynamics.)))

class

is a

nondegenerate

of second-order dynamics and bifurcations to We turn attention now our systems, gradient systems. fields defined in terms of a function of vector yet with different

concludes

This

conservative

which

our study of

431)

432

14:

Chapter

and Gradient

Conservative

Systems)

Exercises)

14.10.

,.\037.0)

Perturbations bifurcations

of

bounded

in the

potentials:

the

for

flows

real parameter, potential functions

A a

For

following

the

discuss

are

which

in one or both directions: - xle- X1 ; (i) V(Xl) = A = 1 V A - cos Xl. (ii) ( Xl)

bounded

14.11. Small perturbations at infinity Given a potential may change the flow: tion Vo (z ) which approaches 00 as I z I \037 00 and V\037( z) > 0 for Iz I large, \037 00 as that there is a perturbation Izi \037 V.x(z) such that V.x(z) also has two critical points which 00 as A \037 O. approach a pendulum of mass m and length Rotating pendulum: Consider strained to oscillate in a plane with rotating angular velocity w vertical line. If u denotes the angular of the pendulum deviation vertical and I is the moment of inertia, then)

14.12.

.. Iu -

l

ii where

A =

2.

SIn u

the time scale, this

changing

By

2

mw

9/

2 (w

attention to the

+ mgl

-

A)

.

u =

sIn

sin u

=

the flows for each flow.

>

A

0 paying

Discuss the bifurcations on two parameters,

14.3. this

Gradient we section, of functions.

the

in A and

X2 = A X2 =

flows of the

equations

following

the

bifurca-

depending

p,:

+

-(Xl

Vector

particular

178.

14.14.

In

a the

from

0,)

Show that the following are Hamiltonian and discuss equations tions in the flow for nonnegative values of the parameters: - dXl). X2 = -X2( c (i) Xl = Xl (a - bX2), Hint: Let Xl = e q and X2 = e P . - Xl)(a - bX2), X2 = -x2(1(ii) Xl = Xl(l X2)(C dXl). q q P P = = Hint: Let Xl e /(1 + e ) and X2 e /(1 + e ).

Xl = X2, Xl = X2,

l conabout

0 .)

14.13.

(i)

and

in the

bifurcations

Help: Consult Hale [1980], p.

(ii)

show. 00

to)

equivalent u

(cos

Discuss

l).

is

cos u

func-

P,Xl

-

-

x\037;

p,)(1

- Xl)(l

+A

+ Xl).)

Fields)

of planar vector investigate a class What makes these gradient vector is the simplicity of their asymptotic

fields

that are

gra-

worthy of a section of their own the (}dynamics: and w-limit sets of bounded orbits belong to the set of equilibria. Following a short summary of rudimentary as a consefacts, we establish this result dients

quence of the observation

that

the

defining

function

fields

is nonincreasing

along)))

14.3. Gradient the solutions of a gradient ter 9. We then explore

also

14.14. If F : JR2 -

the

-

The points at

the

which

the

_

a

2

=

F_ (x))

8Xl8x2

-

a

2

-

F

8X28x2 (x))

(x))

8X28xl

point of F ifV' F(x) the eigenvalues of the Hessian

a critical

be

if

8Xl8xl (x) F

of

significance

derivatives

partial

2

the

the

to

correspond

definition:

nondegenerate

a

vanishes

To underline

following

2 a F

is)

equations

(14.4))

of F

(14.4).

x is said to

critical point x is called the matrix of the second

differential

-V'F(x).)

gradient

system

A point

14.15.

Definition

x,

vector

)

aX2

system of

gradient

corresponding

of the gradient equilibria we introduce such points,

at

gradient

\037F(X)

\037F(X),

( aXl x =

o. A

the

function,

systems that

is)

-V'F(x) and

Chap-

of several specific Using these examples as

C2

is a

---t JR

from

Principle

some of which are old favorites. a subclass of structurally stable gradient identify in the of gradient vector fields. space generic

Definition field

dynamics

Fields

bifurcations

we

guide,

are

Invariance

and

systems,

gradient

a

and the

system the

Vector

nonzero.)

are

case

In the

of the

dynamics

geometry

the

of

of

Lemma 14.16. An bolic if

critical

nondegenerate

lEx is a hyperbolic . x is an unstable . x is asymptotically

of a

point

equilibrium

and only if the

critical

corresponding

of (14.4),

equilibrium

node

if and

precise information

points,

corresponding equilibria can of the function F. graph

be

if

if and

only if

on the local

is hypergradient system (14.4) point of F is nondegenerate.

then

only if F has an isolated and only if F has an isolated

stable

the

from

obtained

maximum minimum

at x; at

x;

. x is a

saddle

point

F has a

saddle

at

x.

of this lemma is that the mafor the verification key observation an equilibrium of the linear variational equation about point of the is F evaluated at that point. the Hessian matrix of system (14.4) the Hessian matrix are real it is a of because symmetric eigenvalues The

trix gradient The

matrix. bolic

The that

points

correspond

to hyper-

of gradient

systems is

points.

most remarkable

equilibrium

critical

nondegenerate

Consequently,

equilibrium

points

aspect

of

are the

only

the possible

dynamics limit

sets.)))

433)

434

and Gradient

Conservative

14:

Chapter

tem (14.4),

is a

If ,+(xO)

14.17.

Theorem

bounded

of a

orbit

positive

the set

set w(xO) belongs to are isolated, points

w-limit

the

then

Systems)

gradient sys-

of

of

equilibria

then such an w-limit Eq. (14.4). If the equilibrium then as IIxll ---t +00, set is a single equilibrium point. If F(x) ---t +00 is bounded. orbit of Similarly, if,- (xO) is a Eq. (14.4) every positive the a-limit set then orbit of a bounded gradient system (14.4), negative If the of to the set of equilibrium equilibria Eq. (14.4). a(xO) belongs an a-limit set is a single equilibrium point. points are isolated, then such ---t is -00 as Ilxll ---t +00, If F(x) then every negative orbit of Eq. (14.4) bounded.

the

We indicate

Proof.

of Eq.

solution

(14.4)

for

proof

for

t

positive

0, then the

>

orbits.

If x(t)

derivative

of

is a

F

bounded

such a

along

solution satisfies) d

dt the

Now,

to the set

Invariance of

Principle

of Section

o.)

9.4 implies

that

equilibria are isolated, set is connected. The statement If the

equilibria.

the limit point because of positive orbits is a

first




1.

from the

examples

membrane.

vibrating

a gradient

Show that

plane cannot

on the

system

have

orbit.)

system:

that the

the

Consider

set

w-limit

conservative

damped .

X2 = Xl

= X2,)

Xl

Show

the

for

the global

Identify

A nongradient

(a)

.

X2 =

+ Xl,)

membranes

orbits:

clinic

a homo

2

b XlX2

reaction-diffusion

homoclinic

No

Xl) +

-

-J.L(X2

system)

gradient

-

vibrating

attractors:

Global

text, the 14.21.

of the

flow

Xl

coming

(3 E JR.

for X2 =

o.

J.L >

14.19. Analyze

is generic,

field

vector

Fields

system, determine the and discuss

a gradient

is

the

Vector

of every

-

Xl

3 -

system)

X2.)

solution exists and

an

is

equilibrium

point.

that this

(b) Show Hint:

14.23.

gradient system.

of the linear variational

equation at the

(1, 0).

point

equilibrium

be a

cannot

system

the eigenvalues

Compute

is a theory of una function and its gradient vector There field: a function which is one of the cornerstone ideas of folding catastrophe theory. of the function F (Xl, X2) = \037(x\037 + x\037) For example, the universal unfolding is the three-parameter family of functions) Unfolding

F(Al,

A2,

A3, Xl,

X2) =

\037(x\037+

X\037)

- AlXlX2

-

A2Xl

-

A3X2.)

catastrophe, the set in the three-dimensional parameter space its number of preimages, associated with this function the umbilic. of the corresponding Explore the phase portrait hyperbolic field. this gradient vector field in vector One could also unfold gradient of the two unfoldings raises the set of gradient vector fields. Comparison in the second reference below. issues, as discussed interesting facts about catastrophe theory the hyperbolic General References: including The Poston and Stewart umbilic can be found in, for example, [1978]. gradient vector field above is discussed by Guckenheimer in Peixoto [1973]. calls the

Thom

for

14.24.

which

Unfolding

F changes

the

elliptic

elementary catastrophes F(Al,

A2, A3,

Xl,

Another entry in Thom's

umbilic:

X2)

the

is

=

unfolding -

\037X\037

of the

\037X\037X2+

elliptic

AlXl +

famous

list

of seven

umbilic)

A2X2

+ A3(X\037 + x\037).)))

439)

440

and Gradient

Conservative

14:

Chapter

the

Explore

phase portrait

Stewart the

subject

erence Milnor

and

@)'@)

functions

of

[1963]. of

application

is a de

case

not

played

a prominent points

Sard's

role throughout this chapof a real-valued function the

and

Appendix

of the

statement

The

continuum

Melo

[1982].

are not isolated single point; see, for Henry

further

for

[1983]

for our purposes

Theorem

ref-

standard

of Sard

Theorem

is on

is

given

details. 37

page

in

A of

elements it is possible

of the set that

of

the

of equilibria; such an example are several applications and yet the w-limit set

is

There

Aulbach

example,

of a gradient set of a bounded on page 14 of Palis

equilibria

w-limit

where of

a

the

bounded

[1984], Hale and

equilibrium orbit is

Massatt

a

[1982],

[1981].

Gradient catastrophe

the

where

isolated,

points and

gradient.)

[1963].

In the system are orbit

function.

in Poston and elliptic umbilic is stored in

of the

field

name

consult Milnor [1965] or Smith

the Appendix; Milnor

under the

study of nondegenerate critical of Morse see the Theory;

A deep

relevant

elliptic

of this

field

is contained

umbilic

Notes)

Critical points is the

vector

gradient

vector

gradient

of PHASER

library

Bibliographical

ter.

The

[1978].

the

of

about the

Help: Information

Systems)

systems have theory; Zeeman

see, [1977]. for

diverse

example,

uses.

play They Thorn [1969],

an important Poston and

role

in

Stewart

in Morse In differential topology, especially to anone flows vector fields to take one manifold along gradient theory, as in are in described Milnor Similar ideas used Smale other, [1963]. [1961 in higher In and to affirm the Poincare conjecture dimensions. 1961a] numerical analysis, computing methods under the names \"conjugate graor descent\" essentially consist of flowing dient\" \"steepest along gradient vector fields; see, for example, Conte and deBoor [1972]. Because of the an equilibrium, fact that bounded solutions approach computations yield convergent results. The of a vibrating membrane is studied in Chow, Hale, and example Mallet-Paret is for reaction-diffusion equations [1976]. A good reference Fife [1979]. It is evident that the dynamics of a gradient are essentially system determined by the equilibria and the possible orbits between connecting of This observation can be made and equilibria. precise practical any pair combinatorics. the vertices of a graph One associates by resorting to simple with equilibria and the edges with orbits. Such graphs are used connecting all two-dimensional to classify as explained gradient flows, by Peixoto in Peixoto [1973] and Hale [1977]. It is not possible to characterize all structurally stable systems in dithan two. However, there is a nice result in Smale [1961]))) mensions greater [1978],

and

14.3. Gradient and Palis and ifold

of

any

and

transversal

turally

stable,

in the set

of

Smale

dimension:

for

gradient

vector

gradient systems with

intersection

of

stable

stable structurally gradient systems.)))

and all

[1970]

and

fields only

unstable

on

Vector

a compact

hyperbolic

manifolds

gradient systems are

open

Fields

man-

equilibria

are strucand

dense

441)

15)

Planar

Maps)

After

about

time,

a dozen

here to

return

some

nar maps.

the

of the

chapters of

theme

on

differential

basic dynamics and

Our motives

for

delving

we

equations,

3 and

Chapter

explore, this

bifurcations

into

planar

of

pla-

maps are

scalar maps; namely, as nuof differential equaapproximations with an introduction to tions or as Poincare maps. We begin our exposition a linearizaof linear section on the dynamics Then, planar maps. following of planar tion, we turn to numerical analysis and give examples maps arisof planar differential equations or from approximations ing from \"one-step\" of scalar differential we Afterwards, equations. \"two-step\" approximations of bifurcations of fixed points, includundertake, as usual, a detailed study bifurcation for maps. The final part of ing the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf an important the is devoted to a synopsis of area-preserving maps, chapter

akin to

merical

the

ones

for

studying

of solutions

The mechanics and possessing a rich class arising from classical history. rather sosubject of planar maps is a vast one that is also mathematically with innocuous continue appearances maps phisticated. Yet, many planar mathematical of this to defy satisfactory Indeed, the purpose analysis. with is to several famous albeit plamodest, acquaint long, chapter you and nar maps encourage you to explore their dynamics on the computer; mathematical for further nourishment, we will refer you to other sources.)))

444

Planar

15:

Chapter

Linear

15.1.

Maps)

Maps 2 2 \037 IR ,

For a given function f : IR

the first-order

consider

equation)

planar

difference

= f(x n ),)

xn+1

(15.1))

iteration under the map f. To avoid drowning in sub or suthe function f to the forefront, it is often as to bring as well perscripts, such a difference convenient to write equation as) is an

which

\037

x

section, after several of maps in the

f(x).)

we explore the geometry remarks, linear function. and many of the concepts from the Most of the necessary notation as 3 are to of scalar in maps expounded Chapter generalized theory easily have that studied Since it is that chapter a planar maps. quite likely you let us several of record these For while rapidly generalizations. long ago, 2 xo in IR is the of a the of sequence point instance, positive images orbit,+ of xo under the successive compositions of the map f:) In this

of

brief

orbits

the

(xo) =

,+ If the

map f is invertible, of f-1 with

composition

O

,-(X

)

{xO, f(xO), ..., we

itself,

=

general f is a

case

the define O

),

and both the positive negative union of the two: ,(xO) = ,+(xO) U The most notable positive orbit under

Definition 15.1.

A

A

fixed

point

such that, IIfn(xO)

x of

-

for xii

is not stable.

x E IR

point

f is said to

every


point

is said

and, in addition, there is an r > all xO satisfying Ilxo - xii < r.) Orbits role

in the

that

are fixed

dynamics

points

of planar

2 is

to

of

maps.)))

n-fold to

xO

be)

...}.)

),

one

fixed

orbit,

of

of f

is the

of a single

consisting

point

xO

if f(x)

= x.

any e > 0, there is a 8 > 0 the iterates of xO satisfy if it x is said to be unstable point if it is stable stable asymptotically if, for

-

fixed

0

of

O

exist, the

called a

Ilxo

A

o.

f-n(x

map is of the map.

stable

be

which

...,

,-(xO). of a

all iterates

the

the negative

orbits

When

point that is fixed

f-n to denote orbit,-

notation

use and

{xO, f-1(x

. . . }.)

fn(xO),

be

such

some

xII < 8,

that

iterate

fn(xO)

of a

\037 x

as n

map playa

\037 +00

prominent

for

15.1. Linear 15.2. A point x* E ]R2 is called a periodic point Definition n period iffn(x*) == x* and n is the least such positive integer. is called a periodic orbit. all iterates of a periodic point of stability, asymptotic stability, and the are immediate by considering corresponding

orbits

the

appropriate

of the

power

minimal

of

The set

instability for

notions

The

odic

445)

Maps

of

peri-

fixed points of

map.

orbit 15.3. A point y is called an w-limit point of the positive of positive ofxo if there is a sequence integers ni such that ni ---+ set w(xO) of ,+ (xO) is the The w-limit and fni (xO) ---+ y as i ---+ +00. +00 f set of In is the a-limit the case set of all its w-limit invertible, points.

Definition

,+(xO)

,-

defined

is

(xO)

15.4.

Definition

f iff(M)

point y

==

After linear

planar

such

M

in

A

that

M,

by taking

similarly

any x

is, for that f(y)

integers.

negative

under the map f(x) E M and there is a

invariant

be

we have

M

in

be

to

said to

in ]R2 is

M

set

ni

== x.

these generalities, we now turn A linear map on ]R2, maps.

to the

main

of this

topic

is given

a basis,

in

section-

by)

x\037Ax)

for some 2 x 2

images

xO

of

matrix A.

, As

in

the

Form

powers of the \302\260

{ x,

planar

A

\302\260 X,...,

A

is the

]R2

n

of

sequence

matrix:)

coefficient \302\260

x,....)

}

we can use the equations, the orbits of matrix A to compute the a let us determine effect of this, x if P an 2 2 is invertible Eq. (15.2):

differential

linear

of a coefficient

the linear map (15.2). To accomplish on the orbits linear transformation matrix,

of xO E

orbit

positive

+ X 0 -_ ( )

case of

Normal

Jordan

The

the positive

under

(15.2))

of

then)

A p)n

(p-l

==

p-l

A np)

(15.3))

matrix a transformation any positive integer n. Consequently, we choose p so that p-l A P is in Jordan Normal Form, and compute. As we saw in Form. of a matrix in Normal the powers Chapter 8, it is easy to compute of linear maps and of several Let us now analyze the dynamics examples portraits. plot their phase for

Example

A

15.5.

matrix in Jordan

sink:

hyperbolic

0.9

0

o

0.8

( We

first

need

to find the solutions

following coefficient

.)

A==

determine the

the

Consider

Form:)

Normal

of

fixed

the

points

linear

of the

) linear map

system (A

- I)x

x

== O.

\037 A

Since

x,

that A -

is,

I

is)))

446

Planar

15:

Chapter

Maps)

xO

x 1 . X 2)

.

.

.

.

..

.

...

..

.

..

,:::\"

.)

...:::::::::;\"'.+..u:;::::::::

A single

15.1.

Figure

in Example

the

invertible,

of A

powers

and

orbit,

x =

origin are

given

0 is the

origin is an how

infer

of A

are

v2

(0,

=

that An

0.9

sink

hyperbolic

and

of the

point

linear

map.

The

stable

0 \302\267)

0 the

approaches

asymptotically

a positive

fixed

only

(0.9)n (

is evident

portrait of the

by)

An =

It

the phase

15.5.)

(0.8)n ) zero

fixed

matrix as n as seen

point,

notice orbit approaches the origin, 0.8 with corresponding eigenvectors

1), respectively.

A nxO

For any initial =

(0.9)nx\037 v

value

l

xo

=

+ (0.8)nxg

\037 +00.

that v (x\037,

v

2

Thus,

in Figure 15.1.

.)))

the To

the eigenvalues l = (1, 0) and

xg),

we have)

15.1. Linear the Consequently, y2 than in the

of

When

positive orbits of

direction

static

examining

should keep in mind that not a continuous connected to interpret certain phase

Example 15.6. A

the

approach

y I.

faster

origin

in the

direction

pictures of phase portraits of planar orbit is just a sequence of discrete curve. As a result, it could at times portraits. Here is an example of this

an

Consider the

with reflection:

sink

hyperbolic

Maps

maps points

you and

difficult

be

sort. linear

map

the coefficient matrix)

with

A= the

Following

and the

notations

any initial vector xo = Anx

O

(x\037,

=

x\037),

0.9 .)

(

\302\260)-\037.8)

computations in

the

example,

previous

for

have

we

+ (-I)n(0.8)n

(0.9)nX\037yl

xg

y 2.)

A nxO \037 0 as n \037 +00 for every xO. However, due to the presence Again, the of the negative eigenvalue, orbit through xO jumps back and positive curves see forth across the xl-axis; 15.2. If we try to fit smooth Figure the points on an orbit, there would usually be a piece above the through a cusp at the origin. the two forming xl-axis and another one below,

15.7.

Example

A

A = whose we

eigenvalues have)

1 (10

1\0372)')

than one. For any initial

are greater A nxO

the coefficient matrix)

Consider

source:

hyperbolic

= (1.1)nx\037

yl

xg

+ (1.2)n

x

value

O =

(x\037,

x\037),

y2.

is an unstable that the origin fixed point; see Figure 15.3. of the inverse of this map, A -n , by considering the iterates it is easy to deduce that the a-limit set of any point is the origin. A hyperbolic saddle: Consider the coefficient 15.8. matrix) Example

It

is evident

Furthermore,

1.1

A=

,)

( with

one

Since

for

and the other

eigenvalue greater any initial vector Anx

O

\302\260)O\0379)

xO

=

=

we (x\037, x\037),

(1.I)nx\037yl

the origin is unstable. However, = (0, 0); see Figure 15.4. a(x\037, 0)

larger

unlike )

than

one in

absolute value.

have

+ (0.9)nxgy2,) a source,

w(O,

x\037)

(0,

0)

and)))

447)

448

Chapter

15:

Planar

Maps)

x 1) x 3) x 5)

-........)

x 4) x 2)

XO)

...

.I . . '. ......: : . . .. ..) . . . . . . .'. : \":.. : ;.:\037:\037\037':i\037i!j!...I...:.:

A single and the phase portrait of the orbit, in Example 15.6.)

15.2. Figure with reflection

Example

linear map:

A nonhyperbolic

15.9.

A =

whose

every an

eigenvalues

on point initial vector

A nxO

we

have

point;

w(x\037,

x\037)

see Figure

=

(0,

15.5.

x\037).

)))

=

( 01')

It

now

is evident

linear

system)

) that,

in addition to since the

Moreover,

point.

(0.9)nx\037

the

0

0.9

are 0.9 and 1. Observe the x2-axis is a fixed xo = (x\037, x\037) are)

Consider

sink

hyperbolic

v

l

+ xg

the origin, iterates

v 2 ,)

that the origin is a

stable

fixed

of

15.1. Linear

15.3. Phase

Figure

.

.

.

.

',.,

,.

.'

Figure

:'

::

.

..

source in Example

hyperbolic

.. .. ..

. .

.

,;

\037. : , ;;;

.'\"

:;;::::'+h)ZlZ\037

equilibrium point f}

-

Yn+l

(15.15) to

algorithm

resulting

A

equation

then

yields

map:)

equivalent

(\037\037)

equilibrium

- Yn-l

Yn+l

At A = 0 this is reduced to it becomes Euler's algorithm.

\037

The

A )

Euler's

while

A < 1.

0
0 and This of PHASER under the name Help: map is stored in the library singer. a. We that < say [1978] where this map first appeared.) Ixl see Singer Also, Big

them

f(x) =

o(g(x))

as

x

\037 0

< clg(x)1 for Ix I < 8.) is a 8 > 0 such that If(x)1 if, for any c > 0, there Notes) Bibliographical @)'@) Here are some examples of these notations: The dynamics has been dealing with monotone maps since the cornmunity 3 = 3 as x \037 = 0(1), sin x = O(x), 0; ) as we cosx shall see in the next chapter. 0(xThe study of nonindays of Poincare, I as x \037 o. e- / ixi = o(xn) 1 cosx = o(x), sin x = 0(1), in the early seventies, vertible real scalar became maps, however, popular from state ainto series a large of theorems Until further The analysis. review article and We next turned notice, by Whitley eventually industry.

-

x-I + x-

found Smith [1983]. the proofs of books these results can and be and the Eckmann and Devaney in, for[1980] example, by Collet [1983], [1986]We Theorem for real-valued functions the Intermediate-value of with and more. the basics of Ita. is real interesting variable. to that one of the most remarkable on note theorems in scalar was Sharkovskii before the maps already proved subject is conIf the function [1964]f : [a, b] \037 IR Intermediate-value Theorem. see also Stefan [1977]. A special became was rediscovered c E (a, b) so inthat tinuousvogue; and f(a) < 0 < f(b), then there existscasea point an article =0.) with a provocative title by Li and Yorke [1975]. f(c) The surprising biperiod-doubling geometric nature of the successive Theorem a real-valued The two statements are the Mean-value furcations innextlogistic-like observed maps was numerically by ofFeigenbaum The gradient denotedbybyLanford))) function of a real This or vector variable.property V'.))) and 1980]. \"universal\" was lateris proved [1978 cover commence some

540

Appendix)

open interval

the

on

differentiable

interval [a,

X2 on the

b],

-

and x 2

xl

are

to x 2 .

L from xl

point x

for some

-

(X2

xI)f'

)

the

on

-

line

polynomials.

interval

I,

there

segment

is a

point

such

an open subset in Rn,

U

defined

function 2

(x

-

line

the

contains

and

segment on the set

xl))

mIl -

-

(x

\037k! f(k)(a)

denotes

the kth

approximations.

Suppose

that

If a and

X

f : I

are

a)k +

of

defined

R

two points in

on an open the interval

that)

(m+1

derivative

\037

any

such

them

\037 between

\"

For the

(x).)

L.)

k=O)

f(k)

.

V' f(x)

Theorem regarding

Theorem. Taylor's m l I is a C + function.

=

=

)

and

tool in local analysis is approximation of functions The next two statements are the scalar and vector ver-

sions of Taylor's

f(x)

l

f(x

and

useful

most

The

where

between

that U is Suppose of U such that points If f : U \037 R is a real- valued 2

then

=

for

two

f(x

Scalar

point x

f(XI)

then)

with

b).

R be continuous, any two points Xl them such that)

\037

b]

Then

Theorem.

Mean-value

U,

(a,

is a

there

f(X2)

that

Let f : [a,

Theorem.

Mean-value

Scalar

)

!

function

the

(x

f(m+l)(\037)

-

a)m+l

'

f.

version of Taylor's Theorem, we introduce a bit of integer (iI, i 2 , . .. , in) be an n-vector with nonnegative The norm of i is Iii = i l + i2 + . . . + in. For x E Rn, let xi be components. if f : Rn \037 R has Iii derivatives, the product xi = xi 1 X\0372. . . x\037n. Finally, general

i =

Let

notation.

let)

=

Dif(x)

alii . aX\0371

containing this

If f :

Theorem.

Taylor's

line

the

=

f(x)

,,1

\037

Dd(a)

\037 R

f(x).

aX\037n)

C m+ l function on an open set a to x, then there is a point \037on

is a

from points

segment

such

line segment

Rn

.

. . .

that)

(x

-

\302\267

1\"

a)' +

+

(m

Iii!

I)!

lil\037m

The of

two

next

functions,

two statements both in the

are scalar

about and

the

\037

- a)',\302\267

lil=m+l)

derivatives

vector

Dd(t;,) (x

cases.)))

of the composition

541)

Appendix

Rule. Let f : IR \037 IR and 9 : IR \037 IR be two realChain If f is differentiable at point valued functions of a real variable. a and 9 is 0 = differentiable at f(a), then the function is composite (g f) (x) g(f(x)) Scalar

at a,

differentiable

and)

Chain Rule.

: IRk

f

Let

differentiable at x function g 0 f : IRk

and

g

g : IRm

and

IRm

0 f)

(x) =

Dg(f(x))

tool

\037

0

local

in

that

such

IRn

Then

at f(x). at x, and)

is differentiable

most important

second

The

\037

is differentiable

\037 IRn

D(g

the

f is

composite

Df(x).)

is the

analysis

Inverse and

Theorems.

Function

Implicit

= g'(f(a)) f'(a).)

0 f)'(a)

(g

Function Theorem. Let U be an open set in IRn and let f : k with k > 1. IE a point x E U is such that the be a C function n matrix Df(x) is invertible, then there is an open neighborhood V of is invertible with a C k inverse.) U such that f : V \037 f(V)

Inverse

U

\037 IRn

n x x

in

Function

Implicit

Theorem. C k function

Let U

an

be

set in

open

x

IRm

IRn

and

1. Consider a point (x, y) E U, n = x If x E IRm and y E IR with c. the n n matrix where , y) f(x, y) Dyf(x, of partial derivatives is invertible, then there are open sets Vm C IRm and \037 Vn C IRn with (x, y) E Vm x V n C U and a unique Ck function 1/J : V m = c for all x E Vm . if c V n such that f(x, 1/J(x)) Moreover, =1= f(x, y) x of is The derivative the and function V V E m n 1/J given y =1= 1/J(x). (x, y)

let f : U

by the

\037 IRn

be a

with

k >

formula)

A useful

-

=

D1/J(x)

corollary

[Dyf(x, 1/J(x))]-l Dxf(x,

of the

Implicit

1/J(x)).)

Theorem

Function

is the

following

fact:

geometric

Let U be an open set in IRn and let f : U \037 IRP Theorem. has rank p whenever f(x) = O. differentiable function such that Df(x) in IRn. is an manifold f-1(0) (n p)-dimensional

Submanifold be a Then

In case local

analysis

Theorem; is useful and

Hale

Lemma and

see,

you

are

wondering

what

the

might be, some contend that for

example,

Golubitsky

third it

Malgrange

and Guillemin

in bifurcation theory, although we did not we did [1982]. Two results to which for of Morse and the Theorem of Sard;

1965].)))

most important

is the

result

of

Preparation

[1973].This theorem refer to it; consult Chow refer in the text are the proofs, see Milnor [1963

542

Appendix)

tion. If x is a coordinate

for all

all

2

f(X)/8xi8xj)

U of

a neighborhood

in

-

= f(x)

The integer

y E U.

x,

with

Y\037+

+

+...

Y\037+l

of negative

number

the

is

k

-

...

-

yr

come

we

Finally,

on

dependence

x IRn

to the

subject at

and the

book

We proceed IR

= 0

Yi(X)

Y\037

the

of

eigenvalues

Sard's Theorem. Let U be an open set in IRn and consider differentiable function f : U ---+ IRP. Let C be the set of critical that is, the set of all x E U with rank Df(x) < p. Then f(C) zero in IRP.)

and

local

matrix.

Hessian

our

and

then there is a

is nonsingular,

Yn)

func0

that

such

f(y) for

(8

a sufficiently differentiable of J, that is, D J(x) = point

be

IR

critical

(Y1, ...,

system

i,

---+

IRn

nondegenerate

matrix

Hessian

the

f :

Let

Lemma.

Morse

initial

with a

the

large:

of

U be

of

uniqueness,

initial-value

an

Let

interlude.

notational

first theorem

continuation,

existence,

and parameters

data

the

both

of

generalizations

a sufficiently of f, points has measure

problem.

an open set in

and

f :U

---+ IR

n

Now, suppose that (to, xO) E U and

x = f(t, A function

x).

f(t,

the

consider

initial-value

problem)

= xo.)

x(to)

x),)

(AI))

initial-value problem of t on I and satisfies the initial for each tEl. If cp is a equation (AI) solution of Eq. (AI) on I, then a function \\11 is said to be a continuation of the solution of Eq. (AI) on a larger interval open cp if \\11 is a solution = I and I for An interval is said tEl. to, xO) containing to, xO) \\l1(t, cp(t, to be a maximal interval of existence to a larger if cp has no continuation in an

(AI)

to, xO) is said to cp(t, interval I containing to data and the differential

t---+

(t, x)

;

be

a solution

if cp is a

C

1

of the

function

interval.

Uniqueness,

Existence,

is an open

set

in

x IRn

IR

and Smoothness. Let and consider the initial-value

x = f(t,

(i) If

f E

value ( ato,

(ii)

(Hi)

CO

(U,

IR

x(to)

x),)

f

: U

---+

IRn,

where

U

problem)

= xo.)

n

problem

cp ( t, to, xO) of the ini tial), then there exists a solution defined for all t on a maximal of existence interval

x O , /3to, x O ).

For any closed bounded on W, set W C U, there is 8 > 0, depending such that (t, cp(t, to, xO)) \037 W for t \037 (ato,xo + 8, /3to,xo - 8). If f E Ck(U, IRn), with k > 1, then there exists a unique solution of the initial-value defined on a maximal interval to, problem cp(t, xO)

of

existence;

moreover,

cp is

C

k

in (t, to,

xO).)))

543)

Appendix

Dependence be a vector with

k >

Let U be parameter in an open subset A Parameters.

on

1, then

solution

the

:X: =

is

a C

k

function

The

proofs

and Levinson

of (A, of

f(A,

to, xO) of

t, x),)

open

set in Iff

ofRm.

R x Rn, x U,

the initial-value

x(to) =

and

E Ck(A

Rn),

problem)

xO)

t, to, xO).

these

[1955],

cp(A, t,

an

Hale

two theorems [1980],

Hartman

are, among others,

in

[1964], and Robbin

Coddington [1968].)))

A

References)

J. [1978]. Foundations of Mechanics, Second MARSDEN, Reading, Massachusetts. C. [1982]. Dynamics, the Geometry I-IV. ABRAHAM, R. and SHAW, of Behavior, Aerial Press: P.O. Box 1360, Santa Cruz, California 95061. A. [1929]. \"Application of Poincare's theorem on 'bifurcation ANDRONOV, points' and 'change in stability' to simple autooscillatory systems,\" C. R. Acad. Sci. 189, 559-561. (Paris), and

R.

ABRAHAM,

Edition.

Benjamin/Cummings:

ANDRONOV, A., LEONTOVICH, E.A., GORDON, on Theory of Bifurcations of Dynamic Systems

1.1., and a Plane.

MAIER, A.G.

Wiley:

New

[1973].

York,

New

York.

ANDRONOV, A. and PONTRJAGIN, Nauk., SSSR, 14, 247-251. VITT,

A.,

ANDRONOV,

Pergamon Press: New ANOSOV, D.V. [1967].

[1937].

\"Systemes grossiers,\"

A., and XHAIKIN, S.E. [1966]. Theory New York. \"Geodesic flows and closed Riemannian

Dokl.

Akad.

of Oscillators.

York,

manifolds

with

Proc. Steclov Inst. Math., 90. and KATOK, A.B. [1972]. in smooth ergodic \"New examples theTrans. Mosc. Math. Soc., Am. Math. Soc., 23, diffeomorphisms,\"

curvature,\"

negative

D.V.

ANOSOV,

ory,

L.

Ergodic

1-32. A.,

ARNEODO,

with

attractor [1982]. nikov,\"

J.

Stat. V.1.

quasi-periodic

Math. [1965].

\"Small

Trans.

Sere

new TRESSER, C. [1981].\"Possible Math. Phys., 79, 573-579.

strange

Commun.

chaotic behavior: An illustration of a theorem of Shil27, 171-182. \" Proof of a theorem of A.N. Kolmogorov on the invariance [1963]. motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian,\" Russian 9-36.

denominators, 2, 46,

[1971]. \"Matrices

P., and

Phys.,

18,

Surveys,

structure,\"

with

\"Oscillations

ARNOLD, of

COULLET, spiral

I: Mappings

of the

circumference

onto

itself,\"

AMS

26,

29-43.)))

213-284. depending

on parameters,\"

Russian Math.

Surveys,

546

References)

\"Lectures

[1972].

on bifurcations in

versal

families,\"

Russian

Math.

Surveys, 27,

54-119. Equations.

Differential

Ordinary

[1973].

[1978]. Mathematical Methods New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.

of Classical

M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Mechanics. Springer-Verlag, New York,

Methods in the Theory Geometrical of Ordinary Differential Equations, [1983]. New 250. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer-Verlag: Berlin. York, New York, Heidelberg, New York, New York, Heidelberg, Theory. Springer-Verlag: [1984]. Catastrophe Berlin. Mechanics. ARNOLD, V.1. and AVEZ , A. [1968]. Ergodic Problems of Classical New New Amsterdam. York, York, Benjamin: R. [1980]. \"A D.G., CHORY, M.A., HALL, G.R., and McGEHEE, ARONSON, to in New Approaches wild discrete behavior,\" system with subtly dynamical P. (Ed.), 339-359. SIAM Publications: Nonlinear Problems in Dynamics, Holmes, Pennsylvania.

Philadelphia,

of maps circle for two- parameter families Commun. Math. Phys., 83, 303-354. near Manifolds B. [1984]. Continuous and Discrete AULBACH, Dynamical Systems New York, New Lect. Notes in Math., Vol. 1094. of Equilibria. Springer-Verlag: Berlin. York, Heidelberg,

[1982]. \"Bifurcations of the plane: a computer

an

from

invariant

assisted

study,\"

Physics Today, 39 (12), 38-45. of number fields in the plane have a finite vector \"Quadratic BAMON, limit cycles,\" Publications Mathematiques, I.H.E.S., 64, 111-142. M. [1988]. Fractals San Diego. BARNSLEY, Everywhere. Academic Press: I. [1901]. \"Sur les courbes definies par des equations differentielles,\" BENDIXSON, Acta. Math., 24, 1-88. of the Henon map,\" L. [1991]. \"The dynamics BENEDICKS, M. and CARLESON, Ann. Math., 133, 73-169. Numerische \"On invariant closed curves for one-step methods,\" BEYN, W.J. [1987]. Mathematik, 51, 103-122. Y.N. Ordinary Differential Analytic BIBIKOV, [1979]. Local Theory of Nonlinear in Math., New Vol. 702. Springer-Verlag: York, New Equations. Lecture Notes York, Heidelberg. 9. G. [1927]. Dynamical Systems, Amer. Math. Soc. Publ., Colloq. BIRKHOFF, Island. Rhode American Mathematical Society: Providence, deformation of a singularity of a vector field on BOGDANOV, R.1. [1981].\"Versal Sel. Math. the plane in the case of zero eigenvalues,\" Sov., 1, 389-421. in the Methods Y.A. [1961].Asymptotic N. and MITROPOLSKI, BOGOLIUBOV, and Breach: New York, New York. Oscillations. Gordon Theory of Nonlinear P.B. [1984]. \"The arithmetic-geometric mean BORWEIN, J.M. and BORWEIN, SIAM of elementary functions,\" and fast computation Rev., 26, 351-366. A \"w-limit sets for Axiom J. Differential R. diffeomorphisms,\" BOWEN, [1975]. 18. Equations, Third Edition, M. [1983]. Differential Equations and Their Applications, BRAUN, HeiNew New Mathematical 15. York, York, Sciences, Applied Springer-Verlag:

BAK,

P. [1986].

\"The

R. [1987].

delberg,

Berlin.)))

Devil's

staircase,\"

References

M. and

BRAUN,

difference [1977]. \"Periodic solutions of finite 35, 139-147. Mathematical Developments Arising from Hilbert J.

HERSHENOV,

equations,\" Quart. Appl. Editor; BROWDER, F. [1976]. of Symposia in Pure Problems, Proceedings Soc.: Providence, Rhode Island. Math.,

CARR, J.

New

Springer-Verlag:

the

of

J. London Math. L. [1963]. Asymptotic

k large,\"

CESARI,

New

Springer-Verlag:

Mathematical

Manifold Theory, Applied New York, Heidelberg,

Berlin.

180-189.

20,

Soc.,

and

Behavior

New York,

York,

N.G. [1934].

CETAEV,

York,

M.L. and LITTLEWOOD, J.E. [1945]. \"On nonlinear differential second order: I. The equation jj-k(1-y2)iJ+y = bAkcos(At+a),

CARTWRIGHT,

equations

of Center

Applications

[1981].

Sciences, 45.

Math.

Amer.

XXVII.

Mathematics,

sur

theoreme

\"Un

Problems, Second Edition.

Stability

Berlin.

Heidelberg,

Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,

l'instabilite,\"

2, 529-534. and

P.J.

CHANNEL,

systems,\"

C.

SCOVEL,

of Hamiltonian

integration

\"Symplectic

[1990].

231-259.

3,

Nonlinearity,

curves of discontinuous quasiperiodic type on a Soc., 44. J.H. [1982]. \"On general of quadratic C. and TIAN, CHICONE, properties sysAmer. Math. tems,\" Monthly, 89, 167-179. and HALE, J.K. [1982]. Methods S.N. CHOW, of Bifurcation Theory. SpringerNew York, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin. Verlag: J. [1975]. \"Applications of generic S.N., HALE, J., and MALLET-PARET, CHOW, Rat. Mech. Anal., 59, 159-188. bifurcations, I,\" Arch. of generic bifurcations, II,\" Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 62, \"Applications [1976].

T. [1938]. \"Analytic

CHERRY,

Math.

London

Proc.

torus,\"

209-236.

of bifurcation to homo clinic

\"An example

[1980].

orbits,\"

37, 351-

J. Diff. Eqns.,

373.

S.N.

CHOW,

J.

tion,\" CHURCHILL,

J.

and MALLET-PARET,

Diff. Eqns., 26, 112-159. and ROD, D.L. R.C. for complex

theorem

integrability

[1977].

\"Integral

[1988]. \"Geometrical Hamiltonian

and bifurca-

averaging

J.

Diff.

Eqns.,

114. Equations.

COLLET,

P.

C.

Math.

Soc.:

and

New

N. [1955]. New York.

Theory

of

Ordinary

Differential

on the Interval as a [1980]. Iterated Maps Massachusetts. Isolated Invariant Sets and the Morse Index, CBMS 38. Amer.

J.-P.

Island.

C. [1972].

DeBOOR,

McGraw-Hill:

Boston,

Rhode

Providence, and

York,

ECKMANN, Birkhauser:

[1978].

CONTE, S.D. Edition.

LEVINSON,

McGraw-Hill:

System.

Dynamical CONLEY,

and

E.

CODDINGTON,

non76, 91-

of Ziglin's

aspects

systems,\"

New

York,

New

Elementary Numerical

Analysis,

Second

York.

and Asymptotic Behavior of Differential W.A. [1965]. COPPEL, Stability tions. Heath Mathematical Monographs. Commun. Math. J .H. [1979]. \"On the Henon transformation,\" CURRY,

Equa-

Phys., 68,

129-140.

CUSHMAN, pOSe

Math.,

R. [1974]. \"The 14, 323-342.)))

momentum

mapping

of the

harmonic

oscillator,\" Sym-

547)

548

References)

of the

\"Geometry

[1983].

CWI Newslett.,

energy-momentum

of the

mapping

pendulum,\"

spherical

1, 4-18.

Brill: Leiden. U. [1954]. The Struggle for Existence. D'ANCONA, A. [1981]. \"Bifurcation results for a class of de MOTTONI, P. and SCHIAFFINO, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 3, 11-20. periodic quasi linear parabolic equations,\" A. [1932]. differentielles a la \"Sur les courbes definies DENJOY, par les equations surface du tore,\" Pures Appl., 17, 333-375. J. Math. Basic Circuit C. and KUH, E. [1969]. DESOER, Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York, New

York.

homo clinic orbits in an integrable DEVANEY, R.L. [1978]. \"Transversal system,\" Am. J. Math., 100, 631-642. \"A piecewise linear model for the zones of instability of an area-preserving [1984]. lOD, 387-393. map,\" Physica Dynamical Systems. Benjamin/Cummings: [1986]. An Introduction to Chaotic Menlo Park, California, Massachusetts. Reading, Nouvelles trajectoires DIENER, M. and REEB, G. [1986]. \"Champs polynomiaux: Bull. Soc. Math. Belgique, 38, 131-150. remarquables,\" E. [1986]. AUTO: Problems DOEDEL, Software for Continuation and Bifurcation in Ordinary Differential Equations. CIT Press: California. Pasadena, M. [1989]. \"Numerical computation of heteroclinic DOEDEL, E. and FRIEDMAN, J. Compo Appl. Math., 25, 1-16. orbits,\" G. [1918]. Erzwungene DUFFING, Schwingungen bei Veriinderlicher Eigenfrequenz.

Braunschweig.

DULAC, M.H. [1923].

les cycles

\"Sur

Bull.

limites,\"

Soc. Math.

France, 51,

45-188.

J.-P. J., MARTINET, J., MOUSSU, R., and RAMIS, [1987]. \"NonAcad. Sci. Paris, Tom 304, Series accumulation des cycles-limites,\" C.R. I, 13, p. 375, and 14, p. 431. of chaos and strange J.-P. and RUELLE, D. [1985]. \"Ergodic ECKMANN, theory Modern 617-656. Rev. attractors,\" Phys., 57, do multistep methods approxO. [1988].\"What T. and NEVANLINNA, EIROLA, Numer. 53, 559-569. imate?,\" Math., solu\"Double EVANS, J.W., FENICHEL, N., and FEROE, J.A. [1982]. impulse tions in nerve axon equations,\" SIAM J. Appl. Math., 42, 219-234. ECALLE,

M.J.

FEIGENBAUM,

transformations,\" \"Universal

[1980].

FIFE, P.

in Mathematics, berg, Berlin. ematics, FITZHUGH, nerve FRANKE,

[1974].

universality

for

Almost

Vol.

28.

Periodic

a class

of nonlinear

Los

Alamos

periodic

Sci., 1, 4-27. Systems, New

York,

Lecture Heidel-

Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in MathBerlin. New York, New York, Heidelberg, and physiological states in theoretical models of

Biophys. J., 1, 445-466. SELGRADE, J. [1979]. stable

systems,\"

of Reaction Diffusion New York, Springer-Verlag:

Aspects

Vol. 377. Springer-Verlag: R. [1961]. \"Impulses

membrane,\" J. and

asymptotically

in nonlinear

behavior Mathematical

[1979].

Notes

FINK, A.M.

\"Quantitative

[1978].

J. Stat. Phys., 19, 25-52.

orbits,\"

\"A computer

SIAM J. Math.

method Anal.,

for verification 10,

614-628.)))

of

References

N.K. and SIL'NIKOV, L.P. [1972]. \"On three-dimensional dynamto systems with a structurally unstable homo clinic ical systems close curve, I,\" Mat. Sbornik, 17, 467-485. Ibid. II, 19, 139-156. [1973]. P. and SPARROW, C. [1984]. \"Local and GLENDINNING, global behavior near homo clinic orbits,\" J. Stat. Phys., 35, 645-696. G. and WILKINSON, J. [1976]. \"Ill-conditioned and the GOLUB, eigensystems GAVRILOV,

canonical form,\" SIAM Rev., 18, 578-619. and their SinGUILLEMIN, V. [1973]. Stable Mappings New York, New York, Berlin. gularities. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, M. and SCHAEFFER, and Groups in D.G. GOLUBITSKY, [1985]. Singularities Sciences, 51. Springer-Verlag: Bifurcation Theory, Vol. I, Applied Mathematical New York, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin. D.G. [1988]. Singularities GOLUBITSKY, M., STEWART, I., and SCHAEFFER, and Groups in Bifurcation Mathematical Sciences, 51. Theory, Vol. II, Applied New York, New York, Berlin. SpringerVerlag: Heidelberg, G. [1990]. GORNI, G. and ZAMPIERI, \"Complete integrability for Hamiltonian with a cone potential,\" J. Diff. Eqns., 85, 302-337. systems D. [1959]. of systems of differential GROBMAN, \"Homeomorphisms equations,\" Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 129, 880-881. P. [1983].Nonlinear J. and HOLMES, GUCKENHEIMER, Oscillations, Dynamical 42. Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Berlin. New New York, York, Heidelberg, Springer- Verlag: S. [1980]. Dynamical SysGUCKENHEIMER, J., MOSER, J., and NEWHOUSE, tems. in Mathematics, No.8. Birkhauser: Massachusetts. Boston, Progress

computation

Jordan

of

M. and

GOLUBITSKY,

J.K. [1961]. \"Integral 73, 496-531.

HALE, Math.,

Oscillations

[1963].

in Nonlinear

Systems.

differential

New

McGraw-Hill:

Ann.

systems,\"

New York,

York,

London.

Toronto,

[1977]. Editor,

Studies in

MAA Studies in

Equations,

Differential

Ordinary

Math-

14.

ematics,

Theory of Functional Berlin. York, Heidelberg,

[1977a]. New

of perturbed

manifolds

Equations.

Differential

Second Equations, [1980]. Ordinary Differential Company: Huntington, New York. Theory,\" [1981]. Topics in Dynamic Bifurcation Rhode Island. Math. Soc., Providence,

New York,

Springer-Verlag:

Edition.

Robert E.

Pub-

Krieger

lishing

[1984]. \"Introduction

to

Vol. 1057. Springer-Verlag: HALE, J.K. and LA SALLE, SIAM

dynamic New

NFS-CBMS

bifurcation,\" in Lecture New York, Heidelberg,

Notes

York,

J. [1963].

\"

Differential

equations:

Lectures,

47, Am.

in Mathematics, Berlin.

Linearity

vs.

Non-

Rev., 5, behavior of gradient-like and MASSATT, P. [1982]. \"Asymptotic sysin Dynamical tems,\" Systems II (Eds. Bednarek, A. and Cesari, L.), 85-101. Academic Press: New York, New York, London. orbits C. [1987]. \"Do numerical and GREBOGI, HAMMEL, S.M., YORKE, J.A., true orbits?,\" J. Complexity, of chaotic dynamical processes 3, 136-145.))) represent linearity,\"

HALE,

J.K.

249-272.

549

296

9:

Chapter

is the

local

Near

Equilibria)

d hu

+

[A2X2

d X2)

In an analogous

of the origin.

manifold

stable

local unstable

for the

initial-value

the

manifold

problem)

= Alhu + gl (hu,

g2(h u , X2)]

obtain

we

way,

= o.

hu(O)

X2),

(9.25))

formidable. One rather these differential equations look Admittedly, Or, better yet, one can can, of course, attempt to solve them numerically. of obtain approximate solutions by using also readily expansions Taylor the then and the functions hs or hu near the origin coefficients, equating

as illustrated in the 9.30.

Example

below.)

example

local stable and

Computing

unstable

us

Let

manifolds:

Example 9.28 in light of the scalar differential equations (9.24) and (9.25). In this case, these equations become)

reconsider

dhs

= hs

[-Xl]

+

=

hs(O)

X\037,

(9.26))

0,)

dXl)

-dhu respectively.

Because

be

in power

expanded

2

[X2 +hu

d X2)

]

= -hu,

of the properties series of the hs(Xl) =

hu

(X2)

=

(9.27))

0,)

(9.27),

form)

1

1

2

3 a 3 X 1 +'..,)

+

3!

2a2X1

1

2

b2x2 + 2

hs(Xl) = -lxi 95, 3-22.

Phys.,

recovering

the

tions.