130 29 39MB
English Pages 291 [581] Year 1991
K. Hale
Jack
Bifurcations)
314
Ko\nak)
and
Dynamics
With
Htiseyin
Illustrations)
Springer)))
H iiseyin
K. Hale
Jack
School of
Mathematics
Institute
Georgia
Ko\037ak
of Mathematics
Department
of Technology
Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
of Miami
University
Coral
and
Science
Computer
FL
Gables,
33124
USA
[email protected])
[email protected]) Editors
L.
Marsden
IE.
Control and Dynamical Systems, Institute of Technology California
Brown
CA 91125
Pasadena,
Sirovich
of Applied
Division
104-44
Mathematics
University
RI 02912
Providence,
USA
USA
M. Golubitsky
W.
of Mathematics
Department
University of Houston Houston, TX 77004
Universitat
USA)
and text art
Cover
Mathematics
Subject
Halil
by
Jager
of Congress
Catalog
Printed
on acid-free
paper.)
Heidelberg
1m Neuenheimer
Feld 294
6900
FRG)
Heidelberg,
Buttann.)
58 Fxx, 34 xx, 58 F
Classifications:
Library
of Applied Mathematics
Department
Card
Number:
14)
92-10512)
New York, Inc. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, written (Springer-Verlag, permission of the publisher Use in reviews or scholarly analysis. for brief excerpts in connection with USA), except electronic comconnection with any form of information storage and retrieval, adaptation, is now known or hereafter or by similar or dissimilar developed software, methodology puter forbidden. even The use of general etc., in this publication, names, trade names, trademarks, descriptive as a sign that such names, as is not to be taken if the former are not especially identified, Marks and Merchandise understood Act, may accordingly be used freely by by the Trade
@ 1991
All
rights
Springer-Verlag reserved.
anyone.) from the authors' TEX file. Photocomposed copy prepared & Sons, Harrisonburg, Printed and bound by R.R. Donnelley in the United States of America.) Printed
9 87 6 5 4 3
(Corrected
third
printing,
Virginia.
1996))
ISBN
0-387-97141-6
Springer-Verlag
New
ISBN
3-540-97141-6
Springer- Verlag
Berlin
York
Berlin
Heidelberg
Heidelberg New York
SPIN
10549030)))
To Who
are the for
Students:)
primary the ou
reason
of
existence r profession
and
this
book)))
Greeting)
Thank
you
and
it is
As
us
the
about
an unusual
explain
it
how
in
book
evolved
will
find ideas
and both
difference
content
at
Brown
bifur-
equations.
and style, let
courses
in
the
Dividuring
University
being.
and
alias equations, dynamical in science, one which chapter germias celestial fields such mechanics, nonlinear oscillations, Over the centuries, as a result of the efforts of sciendynamics. mathematicians alike, an attractive and far-reaching theory has
systems, is an old in applied nated
and fluid tists and
into
you
of dynamics and
from our
sion of Applied Mathematics a three-year period, and came The subject of differential
Inside
geometry
differential
of ordinary
cations
our book.
for opening
examples
and
difference
much-honored
of computers, years, due primarily to the proliferation has once more in turned to its roots with dynamical systems applications a more mature outlook. Currently, the level of excitement and perhaps front but in almost all allied fields activity, not only on the mathematical It is the aim of our book to provide a modest founof learning, is unique. of these dation for taking facets part in certain theoretical and practical exciting developments. of dynamical The subject accessible to systems is a vast one not easily and beginning graduate students in mathematics or science undergraduate and engineering. Many of the available books and expository narratives either extensive mathematical or are not designed to require preparation, be used as textbooks. It is with the desire to fill this void that we have In
emerged.
written
recent
the present
It is both damental ple
setting,
our
book. conviction
and
our
ideas of dynamics and bifurcations one that is mathematically
experience can insightful
that many be
explained
yet
devoid
of
the
fun-
in a simof
extensive)))
viii
Greeting)
we have opted in the present book to proceed Accordingly, by low-dimensional dynamical systems. We will momentarily give a brief of some of the central topics of our book, one which necessarily summary If you are a beginning student of dynamterms. contains some technical rest assured that precise mathematical definitions of all these ics, however, as as realizations the well of in specific terms, ample phenomena dynamical will unfold as turn the equations, you pages. in dimensions one, \"one and one half,\" and two constitute Equations the majority of the text. are devoted Indeed, nearly one hundred pages to scalar equations where, their and despite simplicity apparent triviality, ideas of our subject are already visible. We many of the contemporary in particular, that the basic notions of stability and bifurcademonstrate, tions of vector fields are easily explained for scalar autonomous equationsdimension one-because their are determined flows from the equilibrium formalism.
We
points.
to
scalar
exciting,
that may
doubling
bifurcation,
furcations
how
also explore and show
of periodic
chaos,
etc.
solutions of
approximation
We then
turn to
nonautonomous
equations
the
lead
and is poor-periodand bidynamics
albeit
\"anomalies,\"
numerical
when
arise
of such
solutions
numerical
some of the
maps,
equations
profound
with
periodic
coefficients-dimension one and one half-where scalar natmaps reappear In our discussion of the stability of periodic somaps. urally as Poincare lutions of such equations, we demonstrate how one naturally encounters ideas from the transformation elementary but essential theory of differential equations-normal form theory. These ideas, in the context presented of scalar equations, and more importantly, the philosophical outlook of the recur in later chapters, with a that these ideas convey, subject frequently few
technical
embellishments.
proceed to
autonomous new equations-dimension two--where, equilibria, dynamical such as periodic and homoclinic orbits, appears. In studying behavior, the stability of an equilibrium point, we touch certain subtle topoupon of linear systems as well as the standard aspects logical theory of Liapunov functions. The bifurcation of equilibriurn points of planar equations theory rise to a number of new ideas. for example, the bifurcation gives When, is to other one is led naturally to introduce center manifolds equilibria, and the method of Liapunov-Schmidt to make a reduction to a scalar autonomous equation. The other bifurcation from an equilibrium important is to a periodic orbit-Poincare-Andronov-Hopf bifurcation-and point its analysis can be reduced to that of a nonautonomous periodic equation. There are, of course, other properties of planar differential that equations are more global in character and hence be investigated in terms cannot of scalar chosen to equations. Among these interesting topics, we have include the Poincare-Bendixson theory of planar limit sets, geometry and of conservative bifurcations and gradient systems, and a discussion of struc-))) We next
the
investigate
in
dynamics addition to
of planar
ix)
Greeting
tural
of course, an
stability-with,
include an
We subsequently
of the
theory
ideas
the
on
emphasis
than on
rather
details.
technical
extensive
of
maps.
planar
of certain
discussion
abbreviated
As in
the case of with numerical
scalar
aspects we explore
equations,
difficulties associated solutions of differential in of the and of such bifurcations equations light dynamics maps. To indicate not the richness but also the of this topic, only bewildering complexity we include computer simulations of some of the famous maps. The final part of the book consists of several substantial in examples This section is more disdimensions \"two and one half,\" three, and four. cursive than the previous it is more like a preview to provide ones; designed a smooth entry into certain areas of current research-forced oscillations, of
some
the
strange attractors, of
invited to browse the entries, however, of mathematics, parts
most
tral of
list of the
course,
ruse
must
one
place,
while
general
face the task
especially
in applications.
most
abstractly inclined, grappling irreplaceable source of general in mind, the text and the philosophy
to
with
specific theoretical
be an
numerous
interest.
practical
systems, etc. book, you are,
of
the
analyzing
Moreover,
out
to
equations
the
for
of theoretical and
the dynamics of unraveling insurmountable. The analytically
be
dynanlics
even
examples usually proves observations. With this alike are interwoven with
Unfortunately,
often turns
tions
exercises
difference
and
differential
specific
the
Table of Contents. As you pethat in dynamical systems, as in theorems certainly occupy a cen-
ultimately
equations,
specific
the
in mind
in
covered
topics
through bear
Hamiltonian
integrable
completely
chaos,
detailed
more
a
For
equa-
specific
computer, in
its utility in this is, however, beginning to prove our favorite computer program is, of course, An Animator/Simulator PHASER: for Dynamical Systems, accompanyand Difference Equations through ing one of our earlier books Differential students Our have found PHASER to be an ideal Computer Experiments. in dynamical medium to see the \"dynamics\" and to do some of systems of the it to produce their assignments; we, too, used illustrations for many all
its
versatility,
present
pursuit. On
our
that
front,
book.
Dynamical f3
new
this
Bifurcations
systems
you will be inclined our other favorite
course,
We contributed
would
is
arouse
will
to
like
unselfishly
area. We hope that in interest bifurcation your theory to explore this exciting subject further and vibrant
a vast
book-Methods
record
to the
realization
of our
of
our
book.
of
using,
Theory.
of Bifurcation
in closing our gratitude
Dynamics sufficiently
to
those
have
who
In particular,
the
students-a
lively group consisting of unand graduate students of pure and applied and mathematics, dergraduate of science and engineering-helped our ideas and considerably in fixing Critical readings of the setting realistic bounds for our own enthusiasm.
enthusiastic
text
participation
and insightful
suggestions
by
Nathaniel
Chafee,
Brian
Coomes,
Philip)))
x
Greeting)
Davis,
Robert
Horta,
\037ahin
Ko.. is a small scalar
3
in Eq.
term
ds
==
The
0,
from
(5.8),
second-order
parameter,
we
can
the differential
1
determine
equation)
the function
,
(t
),
leC/'O)
equation jj + y3 - 2>\"y + y = 0, where - theory of sound and is known))) /1,) (5.10))))
m(t) the
arises == in
1)
Scalar
Autonomous
Equations)
IIiiIiiiiiiIi I)))
we present selected basic conchapter, opening about the geometry of solutions of ordinary differTo keep the ideas free from ential technical equations. the setting is one-dimensional-the scalar complications, this
In
cepts
I
these
ity,
pear in various
tion
of
we
examples,
To
ometrically.
as vector
conclude
facilitate
a theorem on what
explain
the
Following existence
geometric
simplic-
and
subject
a differential
analysis,
qualitative
our
and
reap-
a collecunique-
equation is concepts
ge-
such
in and limit set are included of stability of an equilibin determining stability. the role of linear approximation of a scalar the chapter with an example differential equacircle.) on a one-dimensional space other than the realline--a
field,
this discussion. rium point and
tion defined
we
to book.
the
throughout
state
first
Then
Despite their
equations.
are central
concepts
incarnations
ness of solutions.
We
differential
autonomous
i \037
orbit,
point,
equilibrium
The next
topic
is
the
notion
4
this
their
our notation
we establish
section
introductory
tions and
Equations)
and Uniqueness
Existence
1.1. In
Autonomous
Scalar
1:
Chapter
solutions.
Then,
for
differential
motivational
several
after
existence and uniqueness theorem. be an open interval of the real line IR and
equa-
examples,
I
Let
x : I ---+ IR;
t
\037
let)
x(t))
real-valued differentiable function of a real variable t. We will x to denote the derivative dx / dt, and refer to t as time variable. let) Also, independent
be a
use
the
or
the
notation
\037
f(x))
real-valued function. In Chapter 1, we
a given
equations
x
: IR ---+ IR;
f
be
we
a basic
state
of the
will
differential
consider
form)
x == f(x),)
(1.1))
x is an unknown function of t and f is a given function of x. Equation (1.1) is called a scalar autonomous differential equation; scalar because x is one dimensional (real-valued) and autonomous because the function f does not on t. depend I if interval We say that a function x is a solution of Eq. (1.1) on the == I. in a solution for all t will often be We interested E specific x(t) f(x(t)) of Eq. (1.1) which at some initial time we to E I has the value Xo. Thus will study x satisfying) where
x == f(x),)
Equation the
to as an
(1.2) is referred
solutions is
a
called
loss
of
through
of the
character
autonomous
there is no
solution
Xo.)
(1.2))
and problem any of its A useful consequence of in Eq. (1.2) is that equation
initial-value
Xo at to.
differential
in assuming
generality
==
x(to)
that the
initial
value-problem
is
with to == 0, and we will often tacitly do so. To wit, let x(t) be a solution of Eq. (1.2) through Xo at to and define y(t) = x(t + to). Now, observe that y(t) is a solution of Eq. (1.2) through Xo at zero since) specified
y(t) As you
through variables,\"
==
x(t
+ to)
may recall
Xo at to is by the
==
+ to))
f(x(t
from
your
given
implicitly,
==
and
f(y(t))
y(O)
==
Xo.)
a solution of Eq. studies, of \"separation the method
previous using
(1.2) of
formula)
x l
1
s XQ f ( )
ds =
t-
to,)
(1.3))))
1.1. Existence
function
the
One
is defined. integral on the left-hand
the
when
use this formula
to
It is
to
important
in this book is
5)
Uniqueness
the inverse of Occasionally, we will
finding
by
x(t)
this
equation.
of special
solutions
exhibit
purposes of illustrations. However, and one should these integrations solutions.
obtains
of
side
and
differential
for the
equations
it is impossible to perform general, not expect to obtain explicit formulas for this fact from the beginning. In fact, in
realize
to understand as
much as possible about the objective without the knowledge of an behavior of solutions of differential equations formula for the solutions. explicit and their Let us now equations give several examples of differential to realize some of the difficulties that arise in laying the solutions in order and the uniqueness of for the theory, that is, the existence foundations solutions of Eq. (1.2).
our
Example 1.1. The
the differential
Consider
example:
first
equation)
x == -x.)
It
can
be seen
through
at
Xo
it is
0, and
==
defined
only solution of Eq.
(1.4) satisfying 1.2. Finite time: Consider
Example
x
to
It is easy
== x
direct
by
verify
that
differentiation
simple
by
to
(1.4
for
the
2 x(O)
,)
substitution,
is a
e-txo
value
Question: x(O) == xo?
initial-value
problem)
initial
the
==
x(t)
t E IR.
all
==
is
))
solution this
the
I)
Xo.)
(1.5))
or using
formula
that
(1.3),
the
function) xo x(t) = 1 xot
solution.
is a \"nice,\"
the
Notice
solution
x(t)
the function
although
that,
is defined
on the
interval
2
is remarkably for Xo > 0, Xo < O. The importance on all of IR and defined
f(x)
(-00,
==
x
1/xo)
on (-00, +00) for Xo == 0, and (1/xo, +00) for is that the solution is not always of this example of definition of the solution varies with the initial the interval as t approaches the solution becomes unbounded Furthermore, interval of definition. of the I) boundary Example
1.3.
x == IX,)
A
solution
the problem
is given by which
solution
above
does
Consider
solutions:
Multiple
x(t)
==
x(O)
==
is identically
not have
(t +
xo,)
the initial-value with
x >
condition.
1/xo,
the
problem)
O.)
== 0, then there is also 2VXQ)2 /4. If Xo for the initial-value all t. Therefore,
zero
a unique solution through
Xo
at
zero.)))
6
1:
Chapter
Scalar
Autonomous
Equations)
the domain of f(x) == JX is naturally In this example, this situation arises a subset of ffi. In applications, often, cannot population of insects grow to be negative. (:;
restricted
to
instance,
a
for
The above show the necessity of certain conditions on the examples of solufunction f in order to guarantee the existence and the uniqueness We will state such a theorem tions to the initial-value problem Eq. (1.2). in the Appendix. also a more result and below, First, howpresent general we need to a small of notation. introduce ever, piece functions f : ffi ---+ ffi by We will denote the set of all continuous CO (ffi, ffi), and the set of all differentiable functions with continuous first 1 we will use en (ffi, ffi) to indicate derivatives Analogously, by e (ffi, ffi). order n. If the domain the functions with continuous derivatives up through of is a subset U of ffi, then we will use the notation functions CO (U, ffi), etc. If there is no ambiguity, we will usually omit the dependence on the 1 and simply refer to a member of one of these sets as a Co, e , domain continuous function of or en function, etc. In the case of a real-valued k ---+ 1 if all the first several ffi is said to be a e function variables, f : ffi
are continuous.
derivatives
partial
To emphasize xo
== 0
at to
for this
the
1.4.
If f E
infinite)
any Xo E ffi, to !3xo) containing
(Qxo,
Ixo
the initial-value
Also,
for all
==
t E Ixo, satisfying the
if Qxo is finite,
if !3xo is
finite,
interval (possibly '1'(t, xo) of
a solution
==
Xo,) condition
initial
'1'(0,
xo)
==
Xo.
I
==
+00,
1'1' ( t,
x 0) I
== +
00.
(3;o)
1 f E e (ffi, ffi), then 'P(t, xo) is unique on Ixo and derivaits first partial '1'( t, xo) is continuous in (t, xo) together with 1 tives, that is, 'P(t, xo) is a e function. (:;
in addition,
If,
interval Ixo possible largest the maximal interval of existence
The
mal
is an
0 and
then)
lim
called
xo)
Xo.
then)
t-+
(ii)
==
==
Solutions) there
x(O)
f(x),)
lim + I'P( t, xo) t-+a Xo) or,
of
'1'(0, xo)
problem)
x defined
and
x(t)
for
then,
ffi),
==
xo)
and Uniqueness
(Existence
eO(ffi,
often
will
we
'P(t,
words,
x(t) of Eq. (1.2) through use the notation '1'( t,
a solution
of
dependence
initial condition,
solution. In other
Theorem (i)
on the
interval
of existence
of
a solution
in
part of the
(i) of the theorem above solution '1'(t, xo). The maxi-
of Example
1.2 is shown in Figure
is
1.0.)))
1.1. Existence
o)
Maximal
1.0.
Figure
value x(O) = 1 is
initial
and
Uniqueness
t)
1)
interval of existence of the
of x
solution
= x2
with
1).)
(-00,
the function f may not be defined on all of JR. One that f E Cn(U, JR), where U is an open and bounded subset of Theorem 1.4 are the same case, the conclusions \037 \037 t that all of the limit of must as except points c.p(t, xo) Qt o (or t (3;o) to the of U. belong boundary Let us now return briefly to the notation c.p(t, xo) for the solution of an initial-value and reexamine it in light of our foregoing discussions. problem 1 For a given C function f, Theorem 1.4 implies that the family of all specific solutions of x = f(x) can be represented by c.p(t, xo) viewed as a function of two where t E Ixo and Xo E JR. As such, c.p(t, xo) is called the variables, of x = f(x). The domain of this function of two variables could be flow somewhat because the domain of t may depend on Xo, as seen complicated in Example 1.2. The fine structures of flows will be one of our in the main concerns For the moment, we will be content to introduce a chapters. following If f is a C 1 function, common name for our subject-dynamical systems. flow each rise to a the for t, then, map of JR into itself (with gives c.p( t, xo) \037 restricted Here are some of the possibly given by Xo domain) c.p(t, xo). of this important properties map: In applications, is situation of JR. In this
common
(i)
c.p(0,
(ii)
c.p( t
xo) + s,
= Xo,
xo) =
c.p( t,
c.p( s,
xo))
for each
t and s when the
map
either
on
side is (iii)
c.p( t, c.p(
-t,
defined, 1 xo) is a C map
for
each
t and
it has
a C1
inverse
by
given
xo).
itself satisfying these three properties on we can say in conclusion JR. So, dynamical system scalar autonomous differential equation gives rise to a
A map
of
JR
into
is called
that
the
flow
dynamical
a C1 of a
system)))
7)
8
on
are
There
JR.
Autonomous
Scalar
1:
Chapter
will see one such
Equations)
also other
ways
important
case
of
in
and we
systems
dynamical
obtaining 3.)
Chapter
1.1.
.
,. C/
Exercises
Show that the
hypotheses: a unique solution
Verifying o has
the
maximal
x
of
of existence
interval
0, then the solution apor tends to +00 as t \037 (3xo; see Figures 1.5a proaches an equilibrium point if solutions of the initial-value problem and 1.6a. Furthermore, for Eq. (1.1) are unique, then the solutions two different initial conditions with through Thus we have the lemma: < < Xo following Yo satisfy cp(t, xo) cp(t, Yo).
is very
It
In fact, the If f(xo) bit.
lem
(i)
(ii)
is
,+(xo)
tively,
Let
cp ( t,
Qxo
us now We
Yo) for
note,
==
all t if ,-
and
-00]
x is
an
illustrate however,
cp(t,
of the
xo)
initial-value prob-
Then
[respectively,
where
-00],
Xo.
a monotone function
cp(t, xo) is cp ( t, x 0)
0, the only orbit is (-00, +(0), and there is no equilibrium point. We have marked the directions of all these orbits in Figure 2.2. If the c is varied, as long as c < 0, the number and the parameter direction of the orbits remain the same; the is the shifting only change of the location of the equilibrium points :f: yCC . Sirnilarly, for all c > 0, there is only one orbit and its direction is from left to right. However, if of how small an amount c is varied, c == 0, regardless the number of orbits there are two for c and none for c > o. 0) < equilibria 0, changes: any c
1, ticularly Figure accessible diagrams mostof x (mA + 1) x details; in formula is An account of the reference m < 1.) m = 1, andis looss stability given [1979]. were first Wan [1978]. Strong resonances investigated by Arnold [1983] The case Takens and [1974]; an exposition is contained in Whitley [1983]. With these at our disposal, we now turn to generalities.) unresolved. still remains of fourth roots ofexamples unity was initiated by Poincare and studThe study of area-preserving maps Exercises) \037\037.o) for a proof of the ied by Birkhoff extensively [1927]. The main reference 2.1. the of in with orbit Exercise 1.5 the same structure. examples and Siegel is Moser TwistIdentify Theorem groups 1967] [1973]; see also Moser [1962and in a review in Exdescribed diagrams More of recent and Moser [1971]. by developments of thearebifurcation 2.2. Provide the details the computation Hamilto-))) for analytic formulated Moser ample 2.7.))) A comparable theorem was [1986]. usual
or
practice,
it would
B) \"Neimark-Sacker\"
appropriate I .. .. \302\267 . ....
39)
40
2:
Chapter
Bifurcations)
Elementary
2.3. Constant
and
\"logistic
density x(t)
of
such
the
population at a rate
grows
and h
are is
However, when the
- cx 2 -
its size
the
dynamics of the differential equation) The
the
reflect
when the
growth rate
intrinsic
Notice that the
population
density
population
is small.
large, growth is impaired because reflects this behavior.
gets
population
to
according
grows
h,)
c
k and
the
by
of harvesting.
rate to
proportional
== kx
positive;
the
rate.
constant
is governed
a population
all the coefficients
where
at a
is harvested
x
of
a population
that
Suppose
harvesting:
model\"
of,
for
the x 2 term overcrowding; of harvesting k and c, to determine the effect the problem is, for fixed Now, we are the population on the population. Since density cannot be negative, for x > O. For a positive initial of this equation interested in the solutions of value the population is exterminated if there is a finite population density, t such that cp( t, xo) == o. Without finding explicit solutions of the differential example,
equation, show the following: 2 0 < h < k / (4c), then there is threshold ( a) If the harvesting rate h satisfies such that if the initial size value of the initial size of the population On is below the threshold then the population is exterminated. value, then the the other hand, if the initial size is above the threshold value,
population
approaches
(b) If the harvesting rate exterminated regardless 2.4.
an
h
h
of its initial
that a
harvesting: Suppose as in the previous
Proportional
model\"
\"logistic
to the
portional
size
of the
point.
equilibrium satisfies
2
> k / ( 4c),
then the
is
population
size.
grows
population
but
exercise,
to the
according
is harvested
at a
rate
pro-
population:)
x
- cx 2 -
== kx
hx,)
constants. and h are positive Show that if k < h, then, regardless extermination tends toward initial density Xo > 0, such a population as t \037 +00, but is not exterminated in finite time. Also, analyze the fate in the cases k == hand k > h. the population
where
k, c,
of the
2.5.
The
Hydroplane:
rolling,
is
determined
rectilinear by a
motion
scalar mv
==
of a
differential
T(v)
hydroplane,
equation
-
ignoring
of the
pitching
of
and
form)
W(v),)
of the hydroplane, m is its mass, T is the thrust of the is the velocity It is reasonable to assume, for mechanism, and W is the resistance. the thrust is constant. The resistance, on the that approximately simplicity, other should increase with small and large v, but can be negative for hand, of the hydroplane and the intermediate values of the velocity due to rising motions of the hydroplane decrease of the wetted area. Discuss the possible for various values of the constant thrust.)))
where v driving
2.2.
In
this
Theorem
Function
Implicit
Implicit Function Theorem)
The
2.2.
The
a
we state
section,
known as the
turns out
which
Theorem,
mathematical
from
result
fundamental
Function
Implicit
to
analysis be
indis-
an
below version presented pensable tool in bifurcation theory. The simplified of equilibria of scalar differential is tailored for the study of bifurcations A more general form of this important theorem is given in the equations.
Appendix.
Let
-
A
IIAII of A to
(AI, . . . , Ak) be IIAII
we may
which of
vectors
Theorem 0 1 function
a vector in
For
IRk.
2.8.
==
as the
interpret
+ ... +
(AI
will say more
A. We
of
length
F:
that
Suppose
about
norms
IR
x
IRk
---+
(A, x)
IR;
r--t
F(A,
x),
is a
satisfying)
8>
are constants
and)
== 0
0)
and
0
(0, 0) #
ox
II All
< 8}
o.)
a 0 1 function)
0, and
TJ >
{A :
:
'ljJ
---+ IR)
that)
such
'ljJ ( 0)
if there
Moreover,
The Implicit following
== 0
is a
context.
F ( A,
and
(AO,
the equation
satisfies
and
on
\"norm\"
A%)1/2,)
of
there
the
7.
in Chapter
F(O,
Then
we take
now,
be)
xo)
E IRk
F(AO, xo)
'ljJ ( A
))
X IR ==
0,
for
== 0
such
that
then
Xo
II A II
\", x) is guaranteed
existence
Answer:
'lj; ( >..)
==
-
2.3. Earlier
linear
sin x;
with
>..)x
+
>..
-
of
In this section an equilibrium
essentially
be emphasized
of
cos(7r/6 +
the
equilibrium We
the
as in
the
following
(c)
solution
-1).
(1,
sin>..
for
satisfied
+ tanx.)
differential
specific
[Eq.
equations,
and investigated
(2.6)],
of the points as a function differential equation x == if the first term of the that,
a given show
at x is the
perturbations
same in
'lj;(>..)
Equilibria
consider
field f
is a unique
there ==
x);
(2.2)], cubic
point x. vector
the
general
that
we
that (J-L, y)
Function Theorem are
Implicit
Near
bifurcation
and
the function Theorem.
Function
Implicit
2.1 we considered three
Section
Taylor expansion then under rather
x is
(b) 1/2
[Eq. (2.1)], quadratic [Eq.
the stability f(x)
of the
Perturbations
Local
parameters.
the
the Implicit Function Theorem to show equation J-L + (1 - J-L)Y + y3 == 0 near
>.. +
in
by
2
+ x , determine
>...
2.8. Show that the conditions the following functions: (a)
(1 +
== >.. +
examples
analysis
mentioned
we
will
or
quadratic,
linear,
bifurcation
cubic,
of equilibria near above. It should
consider
the
effects
of)))
2.3.
Near
Perturbations
Local
Equilibria
our results are valid Thus, quite arbitrary, but small, perturbations. only a sufficiently small neighborhood around the equilibrium For point. == we shall assume that x has an at 0; if equilibrium point simplicity, I (x) we translate in can to a new coordinate as the not, always proof system, in
of
1.14.
Theorem
I: Hyperbolic
Case with
==
j(O) properties
of the
the higher
order
point
linear
approximation
1
in the Taylor structure of the
perturbations
the
effect
We
=1= o.
j'(O)
that Suppose I is a 0 function saw in Theorem 1.14 that the stability 0 of the differential equation x == j (x) is of the vector field near 0, that is,
equilibria.
equilibrium
by the
determined do not
0 and
qualitative
expansion
field
vector
the
of
zero.
near
flow
the
However,
if we make that influence question remains: what happens perturbations the constant and the linear terms? We will show below that the situation 2.1 also prevails in the general case. in Example To be precise, consider the perturbed differential equation)
x
where F :
x IR \037 IR;
IRk
==
r--t
(A, x)
(2.12))
x),)
F(A,
is a
x),
F(A,
C 1 function
satisfying)
aF
F(O, x)
==
and
j(x)
ax
==
(0, 0)
=1= o.)
j' (0)
(2.13))
Let us first the existence of equilibria of the perturbed equainvestigate tion (2.12). If F(A, 0) =1= 0, then the origin will no longer be an equilibrium point. However, from Eq. (2.13) and the fact that j(O) == 0, we have) == 0
F(O, 0) the
Hence,
8 > 0 and
Implicit 0, and
TJ >
aF
and
==
(0, 0)
ax
Function Theorem a 0 1 function 'ljJ(A)
I' (0)
=1= o.)
that
there
implies
for
defined
II All
constants
are
with
< 8
== 0
'ljJ(0)
such that)
F(A, every
Moreover, given
by
(A,
(A,
The
'ljJ(A)).
stability
Theorem
with
x ==
'ljJ(A)
behavior 1.14.
8 and
0 such
Thus,
'ljJ(0)
that,
(2.14))))
'ljJ(A)).
(A,
for
==
0, we
have
II All < 8,
\037; (0,
'ljJ(0))
==
the sign of Eq.
1'(0)
=1=
(2.14) is)
43)
44
2:
Chapter
Bifurcations)
Elementary
the stability type of the equilibrium the same as that of 1'(0). Therefore, is the same as the stability type of 'ljJ(A) of the perturbed equation (2.12) the equilibrium 0 of the unperturbed equation x = I(x). We can summarize the discussion above by saying that the flow near
to
a hyperbolic equilibrium point is insensitive vector field.
small
of the
perturbations
Case II: Equilibria with quadratic that I Suppose degeneracy. with 1(0) = 0, I' (0) = 0, but I\" (0) =1= o. This is the next order of complication that occurs when we cannot a decision about make the stability of an equilibrium on the based linearization. point Let us consider the perturbed differential equation) a
is
0 2 function
x = F : IRk x
where
F(O, x)
sion
IR
---+
= I(x),)
These conditions of F about the
8F
8
>
II All
(0,
8x
0,)
2F
( 0, 0 ) 8x 2 =
a(A)
and
its
=1= o.)
(2.16))
that the Taylor
expan-
2
+
c(A)2
for any
0,
and,
G
satisfies
the
x),
G(A,
IG(A,
t > 0, there x)1 < tlxl
differential
(2.2) depending on one
perturbation
satisfying)
form:)
a(O) = 0, b(O) = 0, c(O) = I\" (0) =1= 0 and 'TJ > 0 such that the function < 8 and Ixl < 'TJ. As an instance of Case II, let us recall
2 I(x) = x
function
= I \" ( 0 )
0 imply
x b(A)X +
+
02
is a
x), 8
=
0)
(2.15))
x),)
F(A,
together with f(O) origin has the following
F(A, x) = with
\037
(A, x)
IR;
F(A,
parameter
for
x =
equation (k
are
2
=
1):)
2
X =
F('x, x)
in Example 2.2 that two equilibria when Af\"
the
=,x + f\"(O)
.) \037
of this equation changes at A = 0 to no equilibrium when Af\" (0) > 0; behavior of this see Figure 2.2. We will show below that the bifurcation for the general case [Eqs. (2.15) and (2.16)]as well. simple example occurs To verify the assertion above, it is only necessary to demonstrate that = 0 for any small A has a graph which is like a the function F( A, x) near x the existence of a unique parabola. This can be accomplished by showing extreme point of the function F ( A, x) near x = 0 for small A. The extreme F of to the solutions x of the points correspond equation) We
from
saw
(0)
flow
< 0
8F
8x
(A, x)
=
O.)
(2.1
7))))
6)
On
and
Tori
generalization of the ideas from Secif a I-periodic nonautonomous differential is also periodic in x, then it gives rise to a equation on a torus (the surface of a doughnut). differential equation The dynamics of such equations are explored most convein terms of their Poincare which to maps, happen niently in the spirit of Chapter 3, we include a be maps on a circle. Accordingly, brief discussion of such maps and study a landmark the standard example, circle map. Poincare, in conjunction with his work on classical mechanics, was of differential the first to study vigorously the subject the flows for these equations two cases on a in circle his a Since particular maps. days, 2.2). deep These analyticalresults theory several values of a(A) (compare with can of with torus, Figure circle has The of this is to maps analytically emerged. purpose that whenchapter are out be summarized < 0 therepoint by saying a(A)/\" (0)merely a few facts and some will return to this We = rudimentaryequilibria near the origin,highlights. two hyperbolic is a 0 implies that there subject a(A) in Part IV and oscilfrom the > theory seminalandexamples explore when a(A)/\"(O) atseveral the origin, 0 there ofare equilibrium nonhyperbolic lations and Hamiltonian where tori are mechanics, omnipresent.))) about the naturally no equilibrium points origin. in the discussion It is important to observe above that the qualitative of the flow of the perturbed is determined from a structure equation (2.15) of the the function function parameter A, namely, single a(A) correspondof F(A, x). Thus, even there value though may be k ing to the extreme = . . . the bifurcation A of the , Ak), parameter components (AI, A2, (vector) of the perturbed on a single number, behavior equation (2.15) depends we occurs in a the When this situation bifurcation problem, say that a(A). original vector field 1 is a codimension-one bifurcation.))) In
this
chapter,
tion 4.3, we
show
as a
Circles)
that
46
2:
Chapter
Bifurcations)
Elementary
2.9.
Example
Two
consider the
differential
of a vector
A
example
x2
A2X +
A2) are two to the corresponds it is and , given by) ==
(AI,
==
the
Thus
two
+ A2 X
Al
small
parameters,
2 + x ,)
==
Al
points
of
for this
a(A)
function
the
x)
F(A,
==
Al +
\037A\037.)
curve
the
cross
we
equilibrium
function
The
parameters.
A2)
occur as
bifurcations are
a
of
example
on two
depending
minimum value
a(AI'
plane: there
field
equation)
x
where
one: As an
codimension
but
parameters
bifurcation
codimension-one
if
Al
none
and
A\037/4,
0)
A\037/4.
In applications, a single affect several parameter may of a the For expansion instance, consider perturbation. Taylor == x 2 of the vector field perturbation given by) f(x) 2.10.
Example
terms in the following
2 x == A
A is
where bifurcation
a scalar
parameter, and a of the
behavior
+ x2 ,)
+ 2aAx is
a
As before, the
constant.
given
equation depends 2 + 2aAx + x , which
perturbed
minimum
the
on
== value of the function F(A, x) == A 2 is equal to a(A) 2 2 term in the the linear A (1 a ). The sign of a(A) is determined by perturbation if lal > 1, and by the constant term if lal < 1. The bifurcation takes at A == 0 in both cases, but the flow is different depending on place whether lal < 1 or lal > 1. You are invited to draw the bifurcation diagram of the flow. 0 and representative pictures
Case III: Equilibria with
03-function
f (0)
==
0,
the level of complication
that cannot
3 that -x
==
f' (0)
equilibrium point at zero order terms of the Taylor We
cubic
with
occurs
degeneracy. I\" (0) == 0, but if the properties
expansion of f(x). (Section 2.1) in
have seen previously
at least two
were
parameters
f'\" (0)
of the from the linear
be determined
the
In particular,
=1= O.
or
all
dx -
we
of
the have
a
is
is
This near
flow
example
specific
to capture
needed
types of behavior of I under perturbations. in the perturbed the bifurcations equation
that I
Suppose
0,
the
second-
f(x)
==
possible studied
x 3 ; see ExamWe will show below that this example ple 2.6 and Figures 2.12 and is representative of what can happen in the general case near the equilibrium point x == 0 of I satisfying the conditions above when I is subjected are small together with their derivatives to \"nice\" perturbations that up 2.14.
through
order
three.)))
x
==
c +
2.3. More
the
consider
specifically,
perturbed
x= F :
where
x IR \037 IR;
IRk
and would plicated to the two-parameter
important
analysis
of
C3
function
case. In the
= fill (0)
satisfying)
and
perturbation,
to this
lengthy
com-
rather
ourselves
perturbation.
special
section
technical
is
confine
we first study an then show how to
below,
perturbation and
we
Therefore,
presentation
two-parameter
of:- O.)
and (2.19)
(2.18)
Eqs.
far afield.
too
two-parameter
three-parameter perturbation. the bifurcation present analysis perturbation F(A, x) with the following
by giving
a simple
A2),
a
for
A = about
two-parameter, expansion
Taylor
origin:)
F(A, x) with
c(O) 0 such
'TJ > Ixl
0)
(0,
first
We
(AI,
is a
of a
example
the
equation)
(0, 0) = 0,
ox
\037;:
this somewhat
We conclude
of
0,)
us
take
particular
a general
reduce
=
2 (0, 0)
bifurcation
A complete
differential
47)
Equilibria
(2.19))
o2F ox
Near
(2.18))
x),
F(A,
= f(x),
F(O, x)
Perturbations
x),)
F(A,
r--t
(A, x)
Local
O.
(0)
(2.20) is an
Equation of
'l/Jl(X) =
by
(2.21) and (2.22) near the
of a cusp in the (AI, are the parametric representation equations coincides with the curve) which near the origin approximately
These plane
f'\"
of Eqs.
49)
Equilibria
by)
A2(X) =
Eq.
computations above
A2(X)
and
Al(X)
If
of the
results
the
Near
Perturbations
Local
of a
example
field with cubic
a vector
perturbation
\"good\" two-parameter
degeneracy in the
that
sense
the
bifurcations
and the linear terms of the Taylor are determined only by the constant The term of the vector field. expansion C(A)x2/2 did not enter into the in the see Eqs. (2.25) and first to the cusp approximation (AI, A2)-plane; in A and c(O) = O. function is This is because the differentiable C(A) (2.26). the Taylor
Thus,
expansion
for
= ClAl
C(A)
Cl and
where
are
C2
hence,
constants;
C(A)X
2 =
be given
must
C(A)
+
C2 A 2
the term +
ClAlX2
+ ...
by)
,)
has
C(A)x2
C2A2X2 + . . .
the
form)
.)
is smaller than AI, and the x is small, the term ClAlX2 it is to be expected that the than A2. Therefore, bifurcations of Eq. (2.20). term C(A)x2 has little influence on the We now show that an arbitrary two-parameter perturbation of the can be reduced to cubic under certain reasonable conditions, degeneracy, Let J.l = (J.ll, J.l2) be two the special two-parameter perturbation (2.20). Observe
term
when
that,
C2A2X2
is smaller
parameters and
consider
about
the
expansion
F(J.l,
with are
b
x)
a(O) = b(O) > 0 and 17
11J.l11 < band
Ixi
=
the
X2 a(J.l)
=
with the following
F(J.l, x)
perturbation
Taylor
origin:)
+
2(0)
>
0 such
1. This suggests the following
lal
point.
3.8.
Theorem
stable
any
xl < 8, the
from
fixed
the
fixed
Proof.
the
of the
type
evident
unstable
linearization about
given in Theorem 1.14, we expect, of the fixed point x of a type
stability
stability
that a
with the
equation
is
stability
be
analogy
that the
if, for
stable
be
which
Definition 3.7. A fixed point x of J is said to it is stable and, in addition, there is an r > 0 n \037 +00 for all Xo satisfying Ixo - xl < T.
the
of
we make
equations,
said to
for
the inequality IJn(xo) - xl < if it is not stable. unstable
Xo satisfy
x is said
It
notions
to the
definitions:
following
of
of equilibria
to fixed points and in-
return
Analogous
properties.
stability
us
let
diversion,
if
IJ'(x)1
For
Let J be a C I map. A fixed point < 1, and it is unstable if IJ'(x)1 >
convenience,
the origin (0, 0).
Let
u
we first translate the point the new variable defined
be
x
of
J is
1. (x, by
x) u
asymptotically ==
(x,
- x-x.
J (x))
to
Then)))
73)
74
Chapter
3:
Scalar
Maps)
Xn + 1) X2)
Xn)
45\302\260 Line___)
a = 2.0)
Xo)
a = 0.5)
X1)
Xo)
a = -0.5)
X2)
a = -2.0
Figure
3.3.
Typical stair-step diagrams of linear map
Xn+l
== aXn.)))
3.2. the map
f
f(x + u)
g(u) Clearly,
g(O)
to
equivalent
f(x).)
studying the stability of the stability of the fixed (x + u). 0 and define)
E >
fix
min
m\037
+ s)l,
If' (x
max
M\037
Isl::;\037
Since
=
g(u)
if
1,
Suppose
that
Since
EO.
point
80)nl u l,
shows that there must be a u can be taken arbitrarily zero of 9 is unstable.
Let us return
to
J2
computing
with
difference equation (3.5) is
of the
value close
New-
equiv-
map)
2
3.4 the
+
1
x
'
of
graph
this
orbits, one with
that there
two
approximate
o.)
m\037o >
(1 +
inequality
solutions
in Figure
course,
n >
---+ +00.
of its positive from
of
that
>
x
diagram
3.6, that
0 such
f(x)= We
1. Furthermore,
M\037
zero, this implies that the fixed
alent
that
have)
we
asymptotically stable. part of the theorem observe that,
of n, to
>
n
for
0 such
Definition
E in
M\037
as
M:lul) E >
1, M: so the fixed point is
prove
there
0 and
i=
8=
since
Also,
and
---+ +00
M\037lul.)
< M:E
..)
small.
To
define
T(>\",
x), we
use the
F(>\",
T(>\",
Here
is a that)
a(>..)
+
+ b(>\x")
x):)
x).)
G(>\",
that of the theorem imply small. b( >..) i= 0 for >.. sufficiently = 0 is equivalent to the equation x = T(>\", x) x) with)
The hypotheses 1'herefore, F(>\",
pose
x) =
of F(>\",
expansion
Taylor
x)
F(>\",
x) =
-
x).)
b(>..)-lC(>\",
the convergence
illustrating
example
specific
= -b(>..)-la(>..)
>.. +
(1 +
+ x
>..)x
of
the
iterates.
Sup-
2 ,)
>.. is a scalar Then the function parameter. 'ljJ(>..) of the Implicit Function Theorem is 'ljJ(>..) = ->... Recover this function the method of using For this purpose, that successive approximations described above. compute = ->\"(1 + >..)-1 - (1 + >..)-lX 2 . Then, take>.. = 0.1, >.. = 0.3, >.. = 0.5, T(>\", x) in initial value Xo = O. Do you observe any difference etc., and iterate with the rate of convergence for different values of >..?)
where
A
aspects
study of this 5. Chapter
We {XO,
of maps,
class
restricted
certain
be
of Monotone
Bifurcations
3.3.
begin
of
differential We
class.
will
some
introducing
by
of f,
Xl, X2, ..., ...} monotone nondecreasing X n ,
Maps)
called monotone maps, play In this section equations. apply the results to differential
if
where
terminology. Xn+l
==
f(xn)
the
a central we
undertake
role in the
equations
in
A positive orbit ,+ == for n > 0, is said to is nondecreasing, that
{xn} > X n for every positive is, Similarly, ,+ (xo) is said to be Xn+l < if monotone X for n every positive integer n. Combinnonincreasing Xn+l these two we that notions, simply say ing ,+ (xo) is monotone if it is either
monotone nondecreasing monotone
map
if every
or
sequence n. integer
monotone
nonincreasing.
positive orbit ,+ (xo)
of
f
is a
Finally, we call f monotone sequence.)))
a
81)
82
Scalar
3:
Chapter
Maps)
If f is a C 1 function with f'(x) 3.14. > 0 for all x in the domain of definition of f, then f is a monotone map, that is, the positive orbit of is a initial condition monotone Xo sequence. ,+ (xo) any From the Mean Value we have Theorem, Proof. Lemma
-
Xn+l
for some
xn.
For the
-
Xn+l
of
purposes
for
X n ,
f to
we will require
dynamics,
X n
-l))
n,
positive integer
every
- Xo. 0
Xl
-
= f'(xn)(X n
n -l)
f(X
C
least
at
be
the
has
1
with
and refer to such an f simply as a monotone map. is monotone, then the inverse of f, exists. We will use the f-l, the n-fold of f-l with itself. composition f-n to denote
derivative,
positive
If f notation
If f is
3.15.
Definition
of points
of Xo
of
-
f(x n )
Therefore,
that
sign as
same
=
X n
f-l
Xo,
defined
is
monotone, then the negative . . ., and is denoted
(xo), f-2(xO), to be ,(xo)
,+
is
Xo
the
set
The orbit,
(xo).
(xo).
U,-
(xo)
of
orbit by,-
The geometry of orbits of a monotone map is very similar to that of a scalar differential the fixed points act like equilibria, and we can equation: use arrows to indicate the direction of other orbits under forward iteration. to study bifurcations of fixed of monotone maps we points Consequently, need the results in Section as we shall do now. 2.3, only to reinterpret For of let us assume that the notation, map simplicity f has a fixed = if at x we can coordinates to make it so. Fur0; point not, change so in that 0 that is monotone a > thermore, suppose f sufficiently f'(O) small neighborhood of the origin. the perturbed map F(A, Consider x) on k parameters
depending
F : If
in x
the
is that of
of
analysis
of the
zeros
the
\037
(A, x)
of
value
small
fixed
A2, . . . , Ak):
(AI,
C 1 function, then
is a
each
for
x JR \037 JR;
JRk
x)
F(A,
A
A.
it
that
follows
each
for
Now,
of F(
points
with
x)
F(A,
A,
x)
F(O, x)
F(A,
fixed
x)
A,
the
is equivalent
is
= f(x).
also
key
monotone
observation
to the
analysis
function)
x)
F(A,
have
-
x.)
the bifurcations of zeros of a function, of under various types of hyequivalently, equilibria, on the linear, quadratic, and cubic terms. We now translate those potheses results for bifurcations of fixed points of monotone maps.) In
2.3 we
Section
the
or,
Case
C1
map
I: with
analyzed
bifurcations
f(O) = 0 and
F ( 0, x )
Points.
Fixed
Hyperbolic
f'(O)
= f (x
=11.
aF )
Suppose
Consider
and
ax
that
a C 1 map
(0, 0 )
= f , (0 )
f is
a monotone,
F(A, x) satisfying i= 1.)))
3.3.
Figure
3.8.
stable
Asymptotically
O.5x persists
A +
as
A is
hyperbolic
of Monotone
Bifurcations
fixed point of
F(A, x)
varied.)
the perturbed Then, for IIAII sufficiently small, map F has point near zero whose stability type is the same as the stability point zero of the unperturbed map f.) 3.16.
Example
map
f(x) =
and
its
one-parameter
F(A,
of the parameter For each value whose stability type is the same for
the
the
diagrams
stair-step
parameter
linear map: Let us consider perturbation given
One-parameter
O.5x
A.
0)))
Maps
x)
of the
the
fixed fixed
linear
by)
= A+O.5x.)
A, there is a unique the fixed point
as
of the
a unique
perturbed
map
for
F
fixed point hyperbolic A = O. See Figure 3.8 for several
values
of
83)
84
Scalar
3:
Chapter
Maps)
2 monotone, C
f is a a Consider
C2
there
Then
extreme
the
The
( 0, 8x
82 F
0) =
1,
\"
f
points
one
fixed
point
of F,
no
fixed
point
of F
(0)
values
3.17.
===>
> 0
of
= 0,
0:(0)
===>
which
A.
map f(x) = it is monotone.
the
case,
of
f
given
by
2
F(A,X)=A+X+X
3.9. In this
in Figure
to
corresponds
of F,
quadratic map: Consider small neighborhood of zero so that of the one-parameter perturbation
bifurcations
=1= O.
that
One-parameter
a sufficiently
Suppose
f\" (0)
( 0 ) =1= O.
fixed
illustrated
are
0) =
0, 8x 2 (
two
===>
= 0 ( A) f\" (0)
small
local
1, but
(0) < 0
sufficiently
in
=
(0)
x) - x such
O:(A)f\"
x + x2
= 0, f'
f(O)
is a function O:(A), satisfying value of the function F(A,
0:
Example
8F
= f (x,)
O:(A)f\"
for
Degeneracy.
Quadratic
with
map
x) satisfying
F(A,
map
F ( 0, x )
with
Points
Fixed
II:
Case that
we
have
O:(A) =
A and
Therefore, when A < 0, there are two fixed points; at A = fixed point; for A > 0, there is no fixed point of F(A, x). 0
f\"(O) 0, there is
= 2.
one
with Cubic Degeneracy. Suppose that f f' (0) = 1, f\" (0) = 0, but f'\" (0) =1= o. A complete bifurcation analysis of an arbitrary C 3 perturbation F(A, x) of of Therefore, we confine our discussion to the analysis f is difficult. a \"typical\" of a two-parameter example perturbation. As in Case III of Section 2.3, under mild of fixed hypotheses, study of local bifurcations F of can reduced to this The be points example. map any two-parameter details are identical to the ones given previously. Points
Fixed
III:
Case
is a
3 monotone, C
map
with
f(O) = 0,
3.18. Two-parameter cubic Example map: - x 3 in a small of the neighborhood origin the two-parameter, A = (AI, A2), perturbation
Consider so that f
x
F(A, x) = there is a
. . . The trated
the
cusp
in
are
three
there
Al
+
(1 + A2)X
(AI, A2)-plane such that fixed points of F(A, x) for
the map is
f(x)
monotone.
==
For
of f given by - x3 of (AI, A2)
values
inside the
cusp, there
is
one
fixed
point of F(A,
x)
for
values
of
(AI, A2) outside
the
cusp, are
there
if (AI, possible
two
fixed points of F( A, x) for values of (AI, A2) on the cusp = (0, 0). 0), and one fixed point if (AI, A2) bifurcations of fixed points of F listed above are illus-
=1= (0,
A2)
local
in Figure
3.10.
0)))
3.3.
Figure 3.9. Bifurcations origin: values of A are
of fixed
-0.1,
points
0, and
0.1.)))
Bifurcations
of F(A, x)
== A
of Monotone
+ x
2 + x
near
Maps
the
85)
86
3:
Chapter
Scalar
Maps)
A1)
Figure
3.10.
of
Bifurcations
F()\",
x)
=
(1 +
)..1 +
)..2)X
- x 3 .)
if f is not monotone, its hyperbolic Even fixed points persist under small perturbation. Nonhyperbolic fixed of points f, however, can undergo no counterparts bifurcations with in our catalog of bifurcations of equilibria of scalar differential now We turn to one such of bifurcation equations.
importance.)
great
Exercises)
3.12.
4CV.O)
A trans critical bifurcation: a transcritical undergoes
this map with the 3.13.
A saddle-node a saddle-node
differential
Show
that
the map
bifurcation at the equation
bifurcation: Show bifurcation at the
that parameter
parameter
in Example the
map
F()\",
value)..
x)
F()\",
value)..
=
(1 +
+ x )..)x = O. Compare
2.3.)
x)
= eX -
).. undergoes
= 1.
3.14. Find a value of the parameter).. at which the map F()\", x) = ).._x 2 undergoes a local bifurcation. Identify the bifurcation and draw three representative to illustrate your bifurcation.))) stair-step diagrams
2
3.4.
3.4.
Bifurcation
Period-doubling
In this bolic
we
section,
fixed
to perturbations. As
we
bifurcation that a nonhyperwhen f is subjected
an important
investigate
x with
point
87)
Bifurcation
Period-doubling
f'(x) = -1
is
to undergo
likely
saw in previous examples, it flips a point close to
monotone and
when f'(x)
0, there period 2. Furtherorbit is asymptotically stable [respectively, unstable] if more, the period-2 at the origin is an unstable [respectively, asymptotically stable] fixed point this value of A. Proof. fixed
Periodic points
F 2 (A, x) a zero of
points of of F 2 (A, x)
period 2 ==
of
the
A, F( A,
F(
map
F(A,
x) correspond
x)), equivalently, to
the
to
zeros
the
of
- x. However, because of condition x == 0 is point (iii), the fixed this equation but its minimal period is 1. Therefore, to avoid this and locate only the periodic of minimal period 2, we need to points
point analyze
zeros
the
of the
function)
1
-
x)
2
[F
(A,
x)
-
x] .
To the first several accomplish this, we begin, as usual, by determining terms of its Taylor expansion. Let us use the notation to denote \"prime\" the derivative with respect to x and compute some derivatives:)
2 [F
the 2two
(A, x)]'
==
F'(A,
F(A,
x)) F'(A,
x),)
For any[F'(A, is a unique intervals. Xo in+ (-00, point x)]2 Xl), there F\"(A, F(A, x)) F'(A, F(A, x)) F\"(A, x).) = on such that t 01. If we let Xo depending cp( XQ ' xo) In particular, then h we is ahave) homeomorphism. To extend h, let h(Xl) = (3l), origin, h(xo) = 1/J( -t XQat' the r--t Xl r--t as Since now the map h : (-00, Xl] ---+ (-00, Xl. Xo Xl, h(xo) Xl] 2 2 2 == == == F 0 ==0.))) so defined is a 0, 1,) ( ( ) homeomorphism.))) 0)]' [ [f ]' [F (0, 0)]\" [f2(0)]\" of
value
[F
open (A, x)]\"
t XQ
of
==
time
3.4. It follows from these is given by) origin
the
that
formulae
of F2(A,
expansion
Taylor
89)
Bifurcation
Period-doubling
x)
about
the
2
F
a(A) and
functions
the
where
= (1 +
(A, x)
=
a(O) the
Therefore,
1
2
x [F Since
the of
are
the zeros,
If the
x
0,)
=
b(O)
+ . . . ,)
we have
.)
[f2 (0)]'\" been
a(A)
x
is)
seeking
b(A)
x
+6
2
+....)
(3.14))
analysis
slope
A
in a
(1 +
< 0, to determine the cubic function
(0)]'\"
[f2
consider
we
neighborhood A)2
of
of
the
origin,
Example 3.22.
Continuation
of
3.12 and
in Example
its
and x\037,
Similarly,
its
(1 +
if
0 is
A)2 >
1,
(;
Let us now return
to
the
given
perturbation
one-parameter
x\037).
be greater
is stable.
orbit
three
F(A, 0 and
0 and 0 is unstable, then the period-2 map
3
b\037A)
x\037) }.
case
orbit,
simple
the
F(A,
{x\037,
period-2
+
of the zeros of this function is identical to in II of Case Section 2.3 for bifurcations already given In fact, equilibrium points with quadratic degeneracy. > 0, then there is no zero of Eq. (3.14). If A [f2(0)]'\" < 0, to a single period-2 two zeros of Eq. (3.14) which correspond
nonhyperbolic
In
2
satisfy)
b(A)
(A,X)-X] =A(2+A)+T
if A [f2(0)]'\"
orbit,
x
have
we
then there
a
X +
\037A)
expansion
Taylor
=1= 0,
b( 0)
one
2 A)
by
= -x
f(x)
Since
f2(x)
easy to
= x -
verify
satisfied. Thus, orbit
of
minimal
and 3.12. We
1.
For
- 3x 2 ,
18x3 all
that
each
for
period
x) =
F(A,
-(1 +
-
A)X
27x 4 , we
-
of the small
have [f2(0)]'\" remaining conditions
positive
2 which is
value of
A,
= of
A)X
-108
asymptotically stable;
.
=1= O.
3.21
Theorem
is a
there
2
(3 +
It
is are
unique periodic see
3.11
Figures
(;)
conclude
this section
notational
with
simplicity,
several
remarks
we assumed
x =
regarding this
0;
3.21. always be
Theorem can
achieved by translation. 2.
The
nonvanishing
assumption
placed by a condition is always satisfied.)))
on the
on the third second
derivative
derivative
because
be
cannot
[/
2
(0)]\"
re= 0
258
Linear
8:
Chapter
Systems)
.... . \" ,) \037....,.......-)
....................... .................... ............ ..) t)
\\y>) /\302\273){).,
!::,i!\"!!:::f::!:':!! .\".\" \". ...................) ...................... . ....................... ....................... ...............)
.:.:::.:.:.::::::::::::.:....... \" ,) \0370\037jliillli)
Poincare map
8.11.
Figure
The behavior of of the iterates of the
of Eq.
solutions
C : ill?
(8.32),
see
you
linear will
Poincare
undertake a detailed
that
its stability
generalized to
are easily
the
dynamics
map) xO
\037 C
of the
map
of planar
study
ones, in Chapter 15. For find the few remarks below
and
point
xO
ill?;)
in
reflected
,)
linear system
I-periodic
8.11.
Figure
We will the
as the
be viewed
should
which
\037
(8.32) are linear
two-dimensional
linear system.)
a l-periodic
of
have
we planar
the
moment,
acceptable.
developed This maps.
maps, including, of course, however, we trust that The notions of a fixed
3 for
in Chapter essentially
scalar
maps
entails replacing in several norms, Definitions 4.9 and
scalar with and absolute values with quantities vectors, definitions in Chapter 3. With similar replacements, of stability, 4.10 are also readily generalized to yield definitions asymptotic of the I-periodic system (8.32). stability, and instability of a solution A periodic to a fixed point of the solution of Eq. (8.32) corresponds linear and the of the planar map periodic solution of stability type (8.34), is of the fixed the same as the point Eq. (8.32) stability type corresponding in particular of the map (8.34). Notice that the zero solution of Eq. (8.32) to the fixed the of C at the origin. We now summarize point corresponds main implications of these remarks for the zero solution of Eq. (8.32).
Lemma in Eq. (i)
If
Let Then (8.33). 8.22.
IJ.-lil
1, for i
== 2
-..\\.)
(3.16))
that the following lemma shows occurs for initial conditions in
map
f(..\\,
x).)
f'(..\\,
..\\,)
the
4,
logistic
that
Suppose
==
0)
(3.15): > 1, then
0 or Xo
O. Thus, The case 0.5 < Xo < 1 follows from the same argument by noting
We can say limn\037+oo
manner
this,
first
if
Xo
n
\037 +00.
=I-
==
the first
that
iterate
the
about
more
f(..\\,
that
xo)
lies
in the
interval (0, 0.5).
Consequently,
it
one iteration, at most 2, that after (3.16) see Figure 3.13. solutions approach x). monotonically; to it If 2 < A < 3, then x). is still attracting globally but the approach from see Figure 3.14. is no longer monotonic (this is expected linearization); in this case is somewhat more difficult. You should determine 'The proof in the intermediate case ..\\ == 2. what happens is evident
=>
..\\ == be
from Eq.
3 : The
determined
when
1
1, then the solution is again defined for all t. Otherwise, 4.2. For to == of0, X, then the solution is defined only on a finite interval; see Figure we are led to the following of two with invariant a periodsets:))) of 27r. I)))) that solution with Ixo definition notice every I < 1 is periodic
110
4:
Chapter
Scalar
Nonautonomous
Figure 4.2.
Figure
4.4.
Example
Periodic
4.3.
Equations)
flow of
limit: Consider
this equation is given
t.p(t, to,
Notice approach
xo) =
e-(t-to)[xo -
-x +
the
4.5. Limit is
no
-x + cos
differential
t.)
equation)
t.)
cos
by +
\037(sinto
costo)]
that all solutions have the same asymptotic the periodic solution \037(sin t + cos t);
Example
= (cos t)x 2 .)
of x =
Trajectories
x = The
of x
Trajectories
.
x = -x
+
1 1 - - t
fate see
+
\037(sint
Figure
for t 4.3.
the differential
Consider
solution:
+
t 2)))
cost).
---+ +00
: they
I)
equation)
4.1.
Figure 4.4. for
x E III
and t >
1. The r.p ( t,
solution
( t-t 0 )
Xo
that
a solution
solution approaches
every
differential
the
of
as
zero
t
---+
see Figure
equation;
+
to )
( Notice
+ lit - 11t2 .)
1
-
of Solutions
Properties
xo) is given
t.p(t, to,
= e_
to, xo)
= -x
of x
Trajectories
General
by)
1 t,\"
but
+00,
x(t)
== 0
is not
4.4. I)
little that can be said about the general qualitative propdifferential of arbitrary nonautonomous scalar equations. in t, we shall see shortly that However, when the function f(t, x) is periodic case is very similar to the autonomous the qualitative behavior of solutions as is evident in if we replace equilibrium points with solutions, periodic we will derive of this 4.4. Before delving into the details subject, Example nonautonomous linear formula for solutions of a general a useful explicit is very
There
of solutions
erties
differential
equation.
4.6.
Example
Variation
x) nonautonomous
x where a(t) of Eq.
and
(4.2)
is
tial
when
function
constant is
b(t)
formula is ==
0, the
multiplied varied
Consider the
formula.
linear
(in
+ b(t),)
a(t)x
(4.2))
functions.
The solution t.p(t,
to,xo)
by
ft du = e Jj '0 a(u) xo)
This imposing because
==
continuous
scalar
are
b(t)
given
to,
r.p(t,
constants
the
of
equation)
with
t + [xo the
called
e
i to)
constant.
a function
of
t.)))
du
b(s) dS] .
( 4.3))
of the constants formula solution is an exponenthe case,
variation
homogeneous
by a
fS Jj '0 a(u)
In
the
nonhomogeneous
case,
the
111)
112
Nonautonomous
Scalar
4:
Chapter
Despite its defined
formula
looks,
we
(4.2),
ft
If x(to)
==
then
Xo,
y.)
equation (4.2) in the
the differential
Yo and
==
y(to)
a(u)du
== eJto
-
.
== e
y
t
to
respect
of this
solution
the
obtain
with
back to
Now,
returning
enjoy
performing
some
of
the
ft du J to a( u)
differential
b( t ) .) we
equation,
integrate
simply
:)
==
y (t)
t - fS a(u) du e Jjto
Yo +
the
i
variable
we recover
x,
you may
integrations,
we have
solutions
explicit
ds.
b( s )
to)
the
in
used
the solution (4.3). If you this formula to obtain above. 0) examples
use
to
wish
,.(/.0)
Exercises)
4.1. In Example 4.3, x
the
4.2. Write
of
variation
x(O)
x( t)
4.5.
and only Another
l if
+ b(t),
(a) If
Jo
(b)
If
maximal interval
discuss the
and
of xo.)
for the equation x
formula
==
b(t),
where
ft a(u)du = e Jj '0 xo
of
solutions
the
==
a(t)x,
t
e
I8
of x
==
au()
with
f(x( s))
-(sin
there
==
+ f(x)
a(t)x
t)x + 1
ds.)
as t --t +00. solution
a nontrivial
is
0 < t
of x
du
I0
Show that x
problem
a(u) du
t +
solution
the
that
Show
< 1, satisfying
x(O)
==
of the x(l)
l Jo a( u) du
==
if
== O.
the boundary-value Consider problem x boundary-value problem: == Prove the following: with 0 < t < 1, satisfying x(l). x(O) a( u) du i= 0, then there is a unique solution.
a(t)x
l
Jo
== 0
to
function
constants
problem:
boundary-value
boundary-value
4.6.
as a
function.
the behavior
Discuss A
t )x , take
(cos
for linear equations: == Xo satisfies)
Formula
with
==
continuous
is a
b( t)
2
of solutions
of existence
4.4.
new
becomes)
variable
4.3.
To
derive.
new variable y
the
introduce
by)
X
To
fact rather easy to
is in
(4.3)
in Eq.
term a(t)x
the
eliminate
Equations)
0, then
there is a 1
eJ.'
1
solution
a(u) du
b(s) ds
if and
=
O.)))
only
if)
==
4.2. How
exist in this
solutions
many
boundary-value problems: Discuss in the previous exercise for = = et l ; 1, (a) a(t) b(t) = sin t, a(t) b(t) = sin t; (b) = sin 27ft, (c) a(t) b(t) = sin 27ft;
problem
(d)
4.2. In
= sin
a(t)
we begin our
section,
tonomous differential we
study
x= Briefly, assume
Let us
1;
class of nonau-
special
important
the function t with a period
with
is
an
f(t, x) of
the
has
More
1.
addi-
specifically,
equation)
x))
we say f(t, x) the period to be
of
in
differential
f(t,
following
of the boundary-value specific coefficients:
where
equations
the
consider
will
solutions
Equations)
property that it is periodic
tional
the the
t.)
of Periodic
Geometry this
= sin
b(t)
27ft,
Equations
case?)
More
4.7.
of Periodic
Geometry
l-periodic if not,
+ 1,
f(t
x) =
f(t,
(4.4))
x).)
in t. For simplicity we can always rescale
of
we
notation,
t to
make it so.
with certain will be general observations; specific examples in the subsequent sections. of f, the solutions Because of the periodicity of Eq. (4.4) possess certain properties which are useful in determining the asymptotic behavior of the solutions. In order to take of these properties listed below, advantage we will assume throughout this chapter that of Eq. (4.4) are the solutions defined for all t E IR. It is easy to see by direct substitution that if x( t) is a solution of Eq. (4.4), then for any integer k, x(t + k) is also a solution. Let t.p(t, to, xo) be the solution of Eq. (4.4) through Xo at to. The observaof initial-value tion above, in conjunction with the uniqueness of solutions that) problems, implies proceed
forthcoming
t.p(t
t.p(t + The
geometric
translated val
1, to,
+
xo)) on the
2]
1, to
+ 1, xo)
1, to, xo) =
interpretation
horizontally,
[to + 1, to
+
cp(t,
to,
=
t.p(t,
to,
cp(to +
xo),)
1, to,
(4.5))
of Eq. (4.6) is illustrated in Figure
the piece of the solution t.p( t, to, xo) on with coincides the piece of the solution t.p(t,
interval
[to, to
+
1].)))
(4.6))
xo)).)
4.5: when the interto,
t.p(to +
113)
114
Nonautonomous
Scalar
4:
Chapter
Equations)
x)
to ,
( t, \037
+ 1 , to,
\037 (to
x0
))
/ + 1,
(to , \037 (to
C/J1)
to,
Xo )))
(to,
Xo ))
/ iP(t, to,
In the
invariance of
Translation
4.5.
Figure
+ 1
I to I I I)
to (= 0))
xo))
+ 2
I to I I)
of i-periodic
solutions
t)
equations.)
of Eq. (4.4) certain special solutions, namely, 1are of As we shall see shortly, ones, I-periodic great significance. of the solutions nonautonomous role similar periodic equation (4.4) playa x = f(x). Analogous to that of equilibria of the autonomous to equation our presentation in Section 2.4, we begin with the following definition:
qualitative study
the
Definition 4.7. x =
f(t, x) is
solution
A
a
called
t.p(t
t.p(t + T,
moreover,
If,
called the
minimal
solution
T-periodic
+ T,
xo) of a l-periodic
t.p(t, to,
to, xo) =
to, xo)
A solution if is 1 periodic f(t, x) 4.8.
Lemma x = Proof.
then
E for all t The < solution to. to, Yo) to, xo)1 periodic cp(t, if is to be it is not said unstable stable. xo)
solution
ity
Ir.p(t,
r.p( t,
to,
Definition 4.10. be asymptotically Yo satisfying
xol
an
of
to,
Icp(t,
r.
stable
asymptotically
the examples
back to
in the
previous
periodic solution, you section, in particular,
4.4.
Example
begin our investigation For this purpose, we
We now of
such that
0, to, xo)1 -+ 0 as t -+ +00 for cp(t, yo) cp(t, to, xo)
is stable
if it
Iyo
to refer
wish
solution
periodic
illustration
As an may
A stable
of to,
independent all
115)
Equations
on to)
not
and
of Periodic
Geometry
(4.4).
Eq.
that the
the
asymptotic that
suppose
of the solution cp( t, sequence of functions on
behavior
asymptotic
at
looking
the
of will
following [0,
is increasing in U+ and for all t > 0; see
bounded
any solution
u_
O},)
of
period
that
Ic(t)1
satisfies
the
+ M
0 and
{ (t,
A solution remains
O. 0, large, Ixol II(xo) II(xo) the of II must cross the that II has a fixed Therefore, is, diagonal, graph to a solution point corresponding I-periodic (t). We now show the uniqueness of . If we let y(t) - x(t) (t), then Eq. (4.12) becomes) iI
The and are
==
expression
'P
-(
+ y)3
inside
+
3 ==
-y{(
+ y)2
the braces is a positive
y, that is, it is nonnegative If you have no previous zero. +
solution.
a periodic
approaches
and
+
y) +
definite
vanishes
knowledge
( +
of
2}.)
quadratic
form
only when both quadratic
forms,
in
variables
consider)))
126
Scalar
4:
Chapter
Nonautonomous
Equations)
variables inside the braces as a function of two independent the expression that the expression u = 4> + y and v = 4>, and find its zeros. This shows if y f o. This implies that is positive inside the braces y( t) \037 0 as t \037 +00. is stable and every the solution Therefore, I-periodic asymptotically 4>(t) solution of Eq. (4.12) tends to (t) as t \037 +00. Thus, 4>(t) is the unique that the Poincare solution of Eq. (4.12). This result implies map I-periodic of Eq. (4.12) looks like that of Example 4.11; see Figure 4.7.0 qualitatively we investi4.19. In a fluctuating environment: In this example = of the x ax Let a logistic equation gate generalization r(t), k(t) (1 x). and consider functions the equation) be I-periodic, continuous, positive Example
x = r(t) x 1 -
[
can
One
regard
population where
this differential
exhibit periodic Let us first show
k( t)
intrinsic
the
equation as a
this
that
seasonal)
equation
for
model
rate r(t) and
growth
example,
(for
\302\267) k\037t) ]
the
the
of a
growth
carrying
capacity
fluctuations.
has at
least
two
I-periodic
solu-
To solution. The trivial solution x(t) - 0 is obviously a I-periodic if is a solution with that < look for a second observe 0, solution, x(t) x(O) is no I-periodic then x(t) < 0 for all t > 0 and thus there solution with we must show that there is a I-periodic negative initial data. Consequently, < k(t) < KM for initial data. To let Km this solution with end, positive > some constants KM, Km, K M . Then for any solution x(t) satisfying x(t) 0 < x(t) < Km, then we have x(t) < o. Also, if x(t) is a solution satisfying > O. Therefore, any solution x(t) with initial data 0 < x(O) < Km x(t) and approach a for all t E JR, approach zero as t \037 -00, must be bounded this I-periodic solution I-periodic solution (t) as t \037 +00. Furthermore, < 4>(t) < KM. has the property Km It is possible to show that 4>( t) is the only I-periodic solution with initial data; hence, it is asymptotically stable. It is not entirely positive trivial to prove this fact; see the exercises. 0
tions.
We end ble
this section
generalizations
tion with
periodic
examples
=
it,
b,
and
above.
and problems related to possithe Riccati equainstance,
For
coefficients,)
\037\037
where
remarks
some
with
of the
b(r)
+ a(r)x
- c(r)x 2 ,)
with I-periodic functions c(-r) > 0 for 4.19. The form of this equation can be simplified the independent variable T to t through the formula Then the Riccati equation becomes)
c are
continuous,
all
T, generalizes Example if we change somewhat T =
J\037
c-
1
(s)ds.
x =
b(t) +
2 a(t)x - x ,)
(4.13
))))
4.4. where a = ale and in absolute value, periodic solutions
are
see the
such solutions;
the
Consider
x=
3
_x
arguments
of
for
is no
the
I-periodic solutions of number
odd
an
be
The
solutions?
(4.14) is
1.
special
difficult;
Eq.
exercises.)
,.c::>teo)
that the
4.16. Show
If
equation
I-periodic
and e(t) are
d(t),
c(t),
x =
+ c(t)x
2
+ d(t)x
+
show that
the
e(t))
one I-periodic solution. is unAlso, if this I-periodic solution show that there must be another I-periodic solution. Show that x < 0 if x is large enough, and x > 0 if -x is large enough.
Hint:
that
Suppose
I(x)
\037 +00
differential
I is as x
x =
equation
Hint: Use the 4.19. Hyperbolic
Mean
with
function
and
- I(x)
Value
Show that
\037 -00
+ c(t),
where
solution
Equation: the
Riccati
> 0
for
as x
\037 -00.
all
x and Show
satisfying that the
I-periodic c(t) is a continuous which is asymptotically stable.
Theorem. solution
I-periodic
If a(t) and equation)
x=
the
are
b(t)
b(t)
c.p(t,
I-periodic
hyperbolic
solutions, that is, Poincare map are isolated.
Riccati
I' (x)
f(x)
I-periodic
is isolated: A
II' (xo) 1= 1. other I-periodic if
of the
a 01 \037 +00,
has a unique
function,
that
3
functions,
I-periodic
I-periodic
stable.
at least
stable,
4.20.
_x
c(t) is a continuous is asymptotically
where +c(t), solution and
continuous
equation)
has
5
x = -x
has a unique
function,
4.18.
(4.14)
of solutions, but are answer is yes, but a cases are contained in
Exercises)
4.17.
Using
show
can
did not hold and there
uniqueness
If the
there must three I-periodic
(4.14))
t >
for
this
for
constants
d
= d(t),)
that o. However, the argument In fact, we saw in generalization.
is bounded
of Eq.
discussion
two
than
of period
functions
ones given in Example 4.17, one
solutions.
are hyperbolic, then there no more than complete
and
three
sometimes
were
1-
finite
Furthermore,
no more
+ 1)
d(t
c(t),
continuous
arbitrary
longer valid
for c
that
2.1
Section
c(t + 1) =
(4.14)
Eq.
be a
must
of Example 4.18:)
generalization
to the
every solution uniqueness
are
there are
that
prove
large the
where
case
1], there
i=
is very
(4.13)
the exercises.
see
isolated; to
+ c(t),)
where c(t) and d(t) similar
are
Eq.
In the
127)
Equations
exercises.
following
+ d(t)x
is, II'(xo)
[that
hyperbolic
because they even. It is possible
is
number
the
If the initial data for ble. the solution is decreasing.
of them
number
the
=
b
then
01 Periodic
Examples
0, xo) is called hyperbolic solutions are isolated from
corresponding
I-periodic
+ a(t)x
hyperbolic
continuous
- x 2)))
fixed
functions,
points
prove
128
Nonautonomous
Scalar
4:
Chapter
has at most Hint: Suppose
Equations)
solutions. is a solution and introduce the transforI-periodic cp(t) variable of the variable x == cp + y. Then in the new y, the Riccati
mation
equation
two
I-periodic
that
becomes)
-
iJ == c(t)y If we
l
two cases
4.21.
let w
further
==
c(t) dt
Jo
w == -c(t)w l == Jo c(t) dt
0 and
-
a(t)
+ 1.
then
y-l,
i=
==
c(t)
y2,)
0 using
2cp(t).)
the Now, discuss separately the Fredholm Alternative.
that the logistic In Example 4.19, we observed coefficients > 0 and x/k(t)] with I-periodic r(t) solution. Use the suggestion > 0 has as least one positive I-periodic k(t) below to establish that there is exactly one such solution. Hint: Suppose that solutions with I-periodic x(t) and x(t) are two positive x(t) - x(t) > 0 for all t E [0, 1]. Let v(t) == x(t) - x(t). Then show that) Periodic
Equation:
Logistic
equation x
v
==
==
-
r(t)x[l
< r(t)[l -
- x(t)] x(t)/k(t)
[x(t)
x(t)
r(t)
+ r(t)
-
[1
x(t)/k(t)]v
x(t)/k(t)]v)
and) 1
< v(O) exp
v(l) Since
4.22.
is a
x(t)
equal to
1 and
Generalized
< v(O),
v(l)
which
the
Consider
Logistic:
of the
solution
I-periodic
thus
-
r(s)(l
{1
x(s)/k(s))
equation, the
ds
.)
} term
exponential
is
contradiction.
is a
differential
x
equation
ecologically reasonable > 0 and all t, and M
==
x), where
xf(t,
1
in f following > 0 such that f(t, x) < 0 for t, decreasing in x for x x > M and all t. Prove that If x(O) > 0, then x(t) > 0 for all t. (a) l If is a unique positive I-periodic solution (b) Jo f(t, 0) dt > 0, then there to which any other solution with x(O) > 0 approaches. exercise. For further information, Hint: Use the suggestions in the previous see de Mottoni and Schiaffino [1981]. the
satisfies
4.23. Periodic Harvesting:
the
Consider
x =
logistic
[1 where
is a
h(t)
assume that r( t) ally die out.
Show that
As
there
h( t) > 0
so
that
rm
harvesting:)
function. I-periodic the harvested population
and k(t) are continuous, a I-periodic solution x(t), which
property)
, I-periodic
h(t)x,)
r(t)
usual, is
k(t) ]
with
0
Furthermore,
nonnegative,
continuous,
-
equation
-
r(t)x
conditions:
- hM rM
km
< x(t)
0
xo) of
the
this result one would to which is a difficult map object the solution of is available. To circumvent unless Eq. (4.4) compute general in this section we derive for the derivative a formula of the this difficulty, in of solution terms the and the vector Poincare only I-periodic map cp In doing so, we will also discover some other properties of field f (t, x). which are of independent differential interest. equations and
need
x)
If
4.20.
Lemma f(t,
It may
> 1. ifII'(xo) formula for an explicit
unstable
with
cp(O,
cp(t,
0, xo) =
initial-value
following
0,
0, xo))
cp(t,
(t,
differential
a linear
for
=
z(O)
z,)
equation:) (4.15
1,)
is,)
8cp
axo Proof.
then
Xo,
\037\037
that
solution of a i-periodic equation x = is the solution of the 8cp(t, 0, xo)/8xo
is the
xo)
problem
i =
appear
Poincare
the
The
solution
(t, 0, xo) = cp( t,
0, xo)
cp(t, 0, xo)
both sides
Differentiating
chain rule,
of
=
Xo
8 Xo
[ 10
ax
is given +
this
(s, cp(s, 0,
xo))ds ] .
( 4.16))
by)
I(s,
it equation
cp(s,
0,
xo))
with respect
ds.)
to
Xo,
and
using
yields)
t _8cp
{t 8 f
exp
(t, 0, xo) = 1 +
i
0
_8f 8x
(s,
cp(s,
0, xo))
_8cp
8Xo))) (s,
0,
xo) ds.
the
))
130
Nonautonomous
Scalar
4:
Chapter
Now, if we let
z(t)
differential
equation
have the
tion about
consider
if we
following:
==
is, x(t)
0,
cp(t, ==
z(t)
x
==
of the
term
f(t,
0,
cp(t,
the conclusion
Now,
equation
of the lemma
to
==
field
vector
this
of
{I
of
J0
ax
( 4.18))
cp(l, 0,
II(xo)
map,
_ocp
xo).)
(1, 0, xo).
from
follows
(t,
xo)) dt].
Xo yields
8 Xo
0 such that, for IAI < Ao, there dic solu tions \"pI (A, t) and \"p 2(A, x) which have the also that Show -ao/eo and 1P2(0, t) = - J -ao/eo. and \"p2 is are hyperbolic and that \"pI is unstable
I-periodic
JR. Show
JR x
E
Periodic
of Nonhyperbolic
Stability
equation
=
for
0, suppose these values
IAI
each
IAI small.
that there are three of c and d there are
small.
of these x = f(x)
is a unique the same values
0 there with
+
I-periodic Ag(t,
x),
solutions.
where
the function 9
I-periodic with Ig(t, x)1 < 1, and the function f satisfies f(x) = 0 with f' (x) i= 0 for some x. Show that there are constants c > 0 and solution Ao such that, for IAI < AO, the differential equation has a I-periodic show that this is the only I-periodic \"p(A, t) with 1P(0, t) = x. Moreover, within c of x. solution and some the Poincare Hint: Consider above, map. Use the first exercise continuous
is
results
from
and
Chapter
3.)
of Nonhyperbolic Periodic Solutions of a I-periodic seen in Example 4.25, if a I-periodic solution As we have the stability then differential equation type of the (4.4) is not hyperbolic, be determined from the linearization of the Poincare solution cannot map using Theorem 4.22. In this case, we need to compute the higher-order to the of the Poincare map at the fixed derivatives point corresponding how to do this of this section is to show solution. The purpose periodic solution. We first give the in terms of the vector field and the I-periodic of the statement of the main result, and then use it to determine stability the details of in Example solution 4.25. Finally, we present the I\037periodic for some time; however, the not appear The relief sign does the proof. 5.2.
Stability
important ideas such as transformation of variables. solution of Eq. (4.4) and consider cp(t, 0, xo) be a I-periodic about that 0, xo), is,) cp(t, z(t)
contains
proof
Let variation
x(t)
==
cp(t,
0, xo)
+ z(t).)
the
(5.2))))
135)
136
5:
Chapter
Then the
Equations)
of the
terms
several
first
have the
for z will
of Periodic
Bifurcations
variational
differential
(4.17)
equation
form)
z =
b(t)z +
c(t)z2 +
+
d(t)z3
(5.3))
O(z4),)
and the notation O(z4) deare coefficients functions, I-periodic that terms of order z4 and higher; see the Appendix. Notice of the neighborhood of the zero solution of Eq. (5.3) is equivathe study solution lent to the study of the neighborhood of the Now, I-periodic cpo = let us assume that cp is nonhyperbolic, that is, II' (0) 1, or equiva= O. is I-periodic Then the function y(t) lently fo1b(S)ds f\037b(s)ds where the the
notes
t+ 1
To wit, consider + 1) - y(t) = ft b(s) ds. Since the intey(t is invariant over a period of a periodic function under translation, gral t+ 1 = = is ds ds o. Thus, y(t) I-periodic. b(s) ft f01 b(s) in the variational In order to eliminate the linear term equation (5.3), the introduce by I-periodic change of variable u( t) defined in t.
z(t)
The differential
equation (5.3) it =
c(t) and d(t)
where
c(t) = With
this notation,
are
eJo'
we
The
second
2
+
b(s)ds
3
d(t)u
u
variable
new
+ O(u given
2 d(t) = e
will
have
the
(5.5))
),)
by b(s)ds
and
state
our main
theorem.
is a fixed
point of the Poincare equation (4.4). Then
xo
differential
at
the
fixed
point
form)
4
c(t)
of II
derivative
(5.4))
u(t).)
functions
I-periodic
now
ds
b(s)
the
for
c(t)u
Theorem 5.1. Suppose that with Il'(xo) = 1 of a l-periodic (i)
= eJo'
J\037'
d(t).
(5.6))
II
map
is given by
1 II\"
(xo)
c(t) dt
=
21
2co,
the l-periodic the fixed function c(t) is as in Eq. (5.6). Thus, the at solution Xo; hence, 0, xo) of point corresponding periodic cp(t, if is O. unstable Co =1= Eq. (4.4), If Co = 0, then the third derivative of Il at the fixed point Xo is given where
(ii)
by 1
II/\" (xo)
=
61
where d(t) is as in Eq. (5.6). Thus, periodic solution cp(t, corresponding do > 0 and asymptotically stable if
dt
d(t)
the 0, do
6d o,
fixed point at Xo, xo) of Eq. (4.4), is
o.
1
Thus, it
follows
from
solution
cp(t, 0,
1) =
Proof
of Theorem
equation successive
theorem
the cos
21ft
5.1. The
(5.3) to a transformation
differential
above that the nonhyperbolic 4.25 is unstable;
of Example key
idea equation
of variables.
of the
proof is to
with
In the
constant choice
reduce
I-periodic see
Figure the
5.1.
variational
coefficients by using of the
transformations,)))
137)
138
5:
Chapter
of Periodic
Bifurcations
however, care as to have
The transformations must in the transformed equation
taken.
be
must
t so
differential
the
Equations) be
I-periodic
in
variables
be
.
I-periodic.
of the
a consequence
As
ity of 'P, we have
assumption f01
f; b( s) ds is I-periodic.
that
shown
==
b( s )ds
0, the
nonhyperbolicthe
Therefore,
function
is I-periodic. Consequently, the (5.4) exp{f; b( s) ds} in the transformation functions c(t) and d(t) in Eq. (5.4) are also I-periodic. of the one final transformation Now, our objective is to determine with constant coa differential to variables to convert equation Eq. (5.5) The form of Eq. (5.5) suggests that we terms. efficients in the lower-order
transformation)
the
consider
==
u(t)
2
+ (3(t)w
w(t)
(t) +
,(t)w
3
(5.7))
(t),)
functions to and (3(t) and ,(t) are I-periodic where w(t) is the new variable in the formulae we will of notation, be determined. For simplicity below, A few calculations t if there is no danger of confusion. omit the variable for w is given by) show that the differential equation
2{3w +
tV == (1 +
3,W
makes
choice
we
fact, 1)
chose
the solutions ==
of
==
/3
only
are
c
==
0
if
+ f;
(constant)
+
d
function
==
+ O(w 4 )].)
2{3/3)w
3
+ O( w
form:)
4
).
(5.8))
differential
the
that
way
1, the
\" 8w
o
terms in the Taylor
Bo.
(0, 0) of
series
the
(5.21) Poincare
map is
by
n(A,
wo)
==
AOA
+ O(A
+
The ential
AD,
0)
following
equations-is
[co
2 +
) +
[1 +
consequence
+
2 O(A
)]WO (5.22))))
+ O(wg).
O(A)]w6
theorem-saddle-node
an easy
\037BOA
bifurcation of
the
remarks
for I-periodic in Section
differ-
5.1.)
141)
142
5:
Chapter
Bifurcations
5.3.
Theorem ential
of Periodic
Equations)
that
=1= O.
Suppose
AoCo
equation
(i) no l-periodic solution if AAoco (ii) one l-periodic solution if AAoco (iii) two l-periodic solutions if AAoCo
turn to
We now calculating
>
near
A
the
zero,
differ-
In
0; =
0; O.
0, xO center-with E IR? the))) find a IIbifurcation one to IleAtxO IIxo II (9.1)))) attempts point-an organizing
8.1. Properties Definition 8.2.
and x 2 (t) of Eq. (8.2) are said xl(t) I for t each E if, independent IR, the relation C1 x (t) + C2X2 (t) that Cl == 0 and C2 == O.
linearly
implies
solutions
Two
of xl (t) and x 2 2 x 2 matrix whose
Linear independence of the determinant
the
is equivalent to consist
(t)
columns
the
fact
to
be
==
0
that
two
of these
is nonzero:)
vectors
det (x
of
I
2
Ix
( t)
to manipulate a
order
In
bit
of Linear Systems
of Solutions
( t ))
of
pair
all t
for
\037 0)
solutions
E
IR.)
effectively
(8.3))
we introduce a
terminology.
and x 2 (t)
two solutions of Eq. (8.2), then the whose columns are the two solutions (t)), of Eq. =1= 0 for all (8.2). If, in addition, det X(t) t E JR, then X(t) is said to be a fundamental matrix solution of Eq. (8.2). == A special fundamental matrix solution satisfying the condition I, X(O) where I is the 2 x 2 identity matrix, is called a principal matrix solution. 8.3.
Definition
Ifxl(t)
matrix X(t) (Xl(t) is called a matrix solution 2 x 2
I x
are
2
a lemma which provides the useful fact that it suffices at only one value of t, and gives an explicit formula the flow of Eq. (8.2) in terms of any fundamental matrix solution. state
now
We
to
check
det X(t)
Lemma 8.4. Properties of fundamental solutions: of Eq. (i) If X(t) is a matrix solution (8.2) with det X(O) det X( t) \037 0 for all t E IR, that is, X( t) is a fundamental of Eq. (8.2). (ii) IfX(t) is a fundamental the
satisfying
matrix
cp(t,
==
xO)
then
solution,
condition x(O)
initial
X(
== XO
-1
then
solution
the solution of Eq.
is given
t) [X(O)]
\037 0,
for
(8.2)
by)
xO.)
(8.4))
of the initial-value problem x(O) == (i) First observe that the solution == o. is zero: that there Now, Eq. (8.2) identically suppose c.p(t, 0) == are T constants and such that where + Cl, C2, 0, CIXI(T) C2x2(T) xl(t) and x 2 (t) are the columns of X(t). Then, CIXI(t + T) + C2X2(t + T) is also a solution for Eq. (8.2), which for t == 0 is zero. Therefore, by uniqueness
Proof. for
o
of
we have)
solutions,
cp ( t,
Thus,
if we
take t
==
0)
-T,
==
then
o == cp( -T,
Now, the Cl
linear
== C2 == O.)))
independence
Cl X
I
we 0)
(t + T) +
C2X2
(t + T).)
obtain)
==
of the
C1XI(0)
+ C2X2(0).)
vectors xl(O) and
x 2 (0)
implies
that
219)
220
Linear
8:
Chapter
(ii) The
cause it
right-hand
X(O) X(O)-l = I,
it is
is a solution of Eq. (8.2) besolutions x 1(O) and x 2 (O). Since initial condition. Thus, from the
(8.4)
Eq.
of the the
satisfies
also
it
theorem,
uniqueness
of
side
combination
linear
a
is
Systems)
the solution. 0
The of superposition principle implies that the set of all solutions The lemma above shows that the dimension Eq. (8.2) is a vector space. of this vector space is two. After some general facts about the discovering we will the flows of linear determine bases for vector explicit space systems, of solutions of Eq. (8.2) for any given coefficient matrix A. in the first we saw As of our book, the flow of the scalar example linear differential equation x = ax is given by the exponential function = eatxo. To obtain an analogous formula for the flow of linear c.p(t, xo)
planar systems we
-
eAt where for
the
X(t) is any fundamental flow of Eq. (8.2)
the
hence establishing
notation)
the
introduce
be
written
c.p(t,
Xo)
desired
and thus eAt
8.5.
Lemma
(8.6))
Of course,)
AO
the reason
eAt and provide
solution
The
=
for
I,)
choice
this
(8.2). of the principal of notation.
eAt satisfies
solution
matrix
principal
Eq. (8.4)
= eAtxO,)
is a principal matrix solution of Eq. collect several important properties
now
We
ofEq.
as the
analogy.
e
(8.2). Then, matrix exponential)
solution
matrix
can
(8.5))
X(t)X(O)-I,)
matrix
the
following
properties:
(i)
= eAt e As
eA(t+s) -1
(ii) (iii)
= e-
(eAt) :t eAt
( iv ) eAt
= (i)
Proof.
= Ae
For Eq.
implies the
desired
Take
(iii) The
;
=
(8.2).)))
n =
fixed s,
s =
2 2 I + At + l.A 2!. t + ...
the
which
(8.2)
matrices
coincide at t
eA(t+s)
=
o.
and The
eAt e As
are matrix
uniqueness
theorem
equality.
-t
first
Eq. (8.5). The second rem with the observation of Eq.
eAt A;
lAnt n!
any
solutions of (ii)
At
At
\",+00 L....in=O
;
in
property
equality one
(i). follows from
is again that both
the definition a consequence of the Ae At and eAt A are
of
eAt
uniqueness matrix
given
in
theosol\037tions
8.1. Properties (iv) This ones
previous matical
more
is considerably
property
a complete
and
difficult to establish than the a certain amount of mathe-
present the
we will
Here,
sophistication.
requires
proof
of Linear Systems
of Solutions
essential
steps
to make
it
convIncIng.
We should
that it is possible to take property (iv) as the defithat one establishes the of this matrix provided convergence all series. one can demonstrate the other of eAt power Then, properties that eAt the matrix solution of the result is principal Eq. including (8.2). we will establish the however, Following our presentation in this chapter, for its power series expansion from the fact that eAt is the principal formula matrix solution of Eq. (8.2). eAt. observe For the sake of brevity of notation, let us set P(t) Now, the that for each vector XO E JR, the matrix P (t) satisfies equation integral remark
of eAt
nition
P(t)xO = Since P(t) iteratively
Ixo +
it
ds.)
AP(s)xO
(8.7))
appears on both sides of this equation, we attempt to find P(t) If we take as our initial by using successive approximations.
guess) ==
p(O)(t)XO
and
compute
the successive iterates = Ixo
p(kH)(t)XO
as the
then
kth
for
iterate,
k
==
Ixo,)
with)
+
(s)X
it
1, 2, . .
0,
O
AP(k)
., we obtain
ds,)
(8.8))
the
ex-
polynomial
preSSIon)
p(k)(t)xO
1
+ AxOt
== Ixo
+ ,A2xOt 2.
2
1 +...
+
k ,.)
AkxOt
k
.
of vectors given by this p(k)(t)xO first observation is that it suffices to +00. converges of p(k)(t)xO for all XO on the unit circle 8 1 show the convergence {x : == in as can be written a scalar because vector JR2 multiple any II xII I} only, 1 to the is realization a study of point the fact that,thatsince of some vector on 8 . The second observation IIAxol1 will not beand trivial. difficulties associequilibria nonhyperbolic XO a closed thebounded is continuous 8 1 isDespite as a function of set, there with ated role them, however, equilibria playa prominent Q > 0 suchnonhyperbolic that) exists a constant in our subject, as we shall soon see.) 1 for all xO E 8 .) < Q) IIAxOl1 We
now
show
that
as k
formula
Exercises)
the
---+
sequence
The
.t.Q.)
it is now easy to establish the estimates following of the following scalar 1.8. Many examples: Determine the equilibrium points p(k) (t)xo: on the norms of the iterates differential and compute the linear variational about equations equations the equilibria. 1 2 2equilibria 1 the hyperbolic and their Identify stability types. k < 1 + at + eat))) a t + . .also. + akt
for
then there
O.)
in the next section.
apparent
initial-value merical algorithms for solving For example, try to solve the Euler, Runge-Kutta, and various Improved
equations.
parts,
x E ]R?,)
all
I/xll)
system: Since the exact serve down, they often
real
negative
at
become
will
A have that, for
of linear systems can grounds for various nuproblems for ordinary differential linear system using Euler, following solutions
as testing
sizes:)
step 1998.0
-1999.0 )
Compute the eigenvalues explicit solutions; compare
x.)
and
the
your
theoretical
eigenvectors findings
of the with
systhe)))
8.3. numerical
ones.
mathematical
esting things such a behavior and wait, or step
size
ear
system
more
drastic
really have a precise are doing inter-
time
scale.
small\"
To
capture
size, and vary the the eigenvalues of the linon this linear system, see \"very
changes
of
information
Systems
solutions
as on a long, must use either a
places where the How do the magnitudes
above compare? For et al. [1977], p. 124.)
not
well
one
the
accordingly.
Forsythe
short, as
numerically, detect
term stiff does means that the
way, the it usually
the
By
definition; on a very
in Linear
Equivalence
Qualitative
step
are
in Linear Systems Equivalence The of this section is to investigate the question of qualitative purpose of planar linear in the spirit of Section 2.6. Let equivalence systems of qualitative equivalence. begin with a precise definition of the notion 8.3.
Qualitative
us
linear systems i = Ax and i = Bx are said if there is a homeomorphism h : IR 2 \037 IR 2 equivalent topologically of the plane, that is, h is continuous with continuous inverse, that maps the orbits ofi = Bx and preserves the sense of the orbits ofi = Ax onto
Definition 8.13. to
direction of Since
convenient by
Two
planar
be
time.)
have a formula to recast this definition
we
one flow to
mapping
for
the other, h(eAtx)
flows
the in that
of planar
a somewhat
linear systems,
more quantitative
it
is
form
is,)
= eBth(x))
(8.20 ))
for every t E IR and x E ]R2. A homeomorphism h satisfying Eq. (8.20) in Definition 8.13; while than it the one required is a bit more special orbits onto orbits, it also preserves the time parametrizations of the maps orbits. However, as we shall shortly see, in the case A and B are hyperbolic, nonzero real parts, the homeomorphism h in chosen to satisfy Eq. (8.20). of linear is a someThe question of topological equivalence systems to motivate the introduction of the formal what difficult one. Therefore, let us first reexamine the redefinition of qualitative equivalence above, of transforming matrices into sults of the previous section. In the course their Jordan Normal Forms we have investigated the question of topological in a limited context by considering linear maps only invertible equivalence and In as our allowable fact, Eqs. (8.9) homeomorphisms. imply (8.11) A = P-1BP, that if there is an invertible 2 x 2 matrix P such that then the flows of i = A x and i = B x are related by PeAt = eBtp. In other if matrices A and B are similar, also called conjugate, then the flows words, i = B x are the))) of i = A x and It is easy to verify linearly equivalent.
that
is, their
Definition
eigenvalues
8.13
have
can indeed be
237)
238
Linear
8:
Chapter
Systems)
converse implication by simply and then evaluating it at t = o.
the
differentiating
= eBtp
PeAt
equation
is a bit too restrictive for comparing Unfortunately, linear equivalence features of flows of linear For the two qualitative example, systems. x = - 2 I should be linear systems x = - I and considered qualitatively this follows from the fact equivalent equivalent; yet they are not linearly that the matrices -land - 21 are not similar because they have different as shown in the exercises. eigenvalues, the differenone may naturally ponder After about linear equivalence, A tiable equivalence of linear For two matrices and B, does systems: given there a diffeomorphism h : IR 2 \037 IR 2 satisfying h(eAtx) = eBth(x)? exist In the case of hyperbolic linear systems, differentiable equivalence offers
the
as the
new,
nothing
8.14. Two
Lemma
Linear
Proof.
we
therefore,
linear
hyperbolic
equivalence,
of
converse
Ax and x = Bx
are
equivalent.)
linearly
differentiable
implies
course,
to show the
need
x =
systems
only if they are
if and
equivalent
differentiably
attests:)
lemma
simple
following
Suppose
implication.
equivalence; ........ that h :
2
is a diffeomorphism satisfying Let h(O) = c. Since Eq. (8.20). c is an equilibrium that equilibrium point of x = Ax, it follows the diffeomorphism of JR? point of x = Bx, that is, Bc = o. Now, consider of the shift g(x) \037 x-c. takes orbits The diffeomorphism consisting 9 ........ of x == Bx into itself, and the diffeomorphism h = 9 0 h takes orbits of x = Ax to the orbits x = Bx that while leaving the origin fixed, is, h satisfies Eq. (8.20) and h(O) = o. with to xO and set xO = 0, Now, if we differentiate Eq. (8.20) respect we obtain HeAt = eBt H, where H = Dxh(O) which is a linear map. If we to t and set t = 0, then HA = BH. differentiate with respect )
IR 2
o
\037 IR
is an
It
but
is evident
face
the
difficult
from the foregoing task of deciding
systems using homeomorphisms Let us now state two theorems lengths,
systems and discuss we will defer the proofs
theorem
covering the
nar
linear
Theorem have
nonzero
8.15. real
hyperbolic
of
equivalence
qualitative
choice
of linear
plane.
topological classification of plaimplications. Because of their end of the section. Here is the first
on the
of their
some to
the
linear
Suppose that the Then the
parts.
the
we have no
that
discussion
the
systems.) eigenvalues
two
linear
of two systems
A and B Ax and x = Bx
matrices
x =
if and only if A and B have the same number equivalent topologically of eigenvalues with negative (and hence positive) real parts. Consequently, there are three distinct equivalence classes up to topological equivalence, of hyperbolic linear the following repreplanar systems with, for example, are
sentatives:)))
8.3. two
(i) (ii)
books
elementary of
equivalence
and one negative
positive
(\037 \0371):
In
eigenvalues;
positive
one
(iii)
ear
two
(\037 \037):
Systems
eigenvalues;
negative
\0371):
(\0371
in Linear
Equivalence
Qualitative
on differential linear
hyperbolic
eigenvalue.
equations, most
often
only
is considered and a
systems
the lin-
host
of
are introduced to label improper node, spiral, etc., various see Figure 8.4. From the topological phase portraits; viewpoint, there ar\037' only three cases and they are determined however, solely by the in the theorem above. signs of the real parts of the eigenvalues, as asserted Notice in particular the striking assertion that a stable spiral and a stable node are topologically equivalent. Consequently, it is preferable to emthe whose ploy following terminology appropriateness will become apparent when we study the qualitative features of nonlinear differential equations near an equilibrium: A linear system whose have negative real eigenvalues is a called a linear whose have parts sink; hyperbolic system eigenvalues
as node,
such
terms,
a hyperbolic positive real parts is called and the other is the negative positive
and, when one system is said to be
source; linear
is
eigenvalue
a hyperbolic
saddle.
We next
the
present
of nonhyperbolic
classification
topological
linear
systems.
If a coefficient then the planar
8.16.
Theorem zero
real
part,
equivalent to precisely indicated coefficient
matrices:
zero
matrix;
( i)
(ii) (iii) (iv)
(v)
(\037\037):
(\0371
\037):
(\037\037):
(g
the
\037):
one
negative
one
positive
two
zero
two (\0371
one
\037):
of
linear
the
and one and one
eigenvalues
purely
imaginary
x
system
following
zero
zero
at least one
A has
matrix
five
==
linear
eigenvalue
with
is topologically with the systems
A x
eigenvalue;
eigenvalue;
but one
eigenvector;
eigenvalues.
Phase portraits of the representatives and of the three hyperbolic the linear systems are depicted in Figure 8.5. From a visual inspection of phase portraits of linear systems, the conclusions of the two theorems above are quite plausible, yet formal proofs turn out to be somewhat long and intricate. We now this arduous begin will which our attention the of this task, occupy part during remaining with some results on forms. section, auxiliary quadratic A real symmetric matrix C, that is, C T == C where the superscript T denotes the is said to be positive if the quadratic form))) transpose, definite five nonhyperbolic
239)
240
Linear
8:
Chapter
Systems)
about the
Information
Stewart the
subject
erence Milnor
and
[1963]. of
application
is a de
case
not
continuum
Melo
[1982].
are not isolated single point; see, for Henry
further
for
[1983]
for our purposes
Theorem
ref-
standard
of Sard
Theorem
is on
is
given
details. 37
page
in
A of
elements it is possible
of the set that
of
the
of equilibria; such an example are several applications and yet the w-limit set
is
There
Aulbach
example,
of a gradient set of a bounded on page 14 of Palis
equilibria
w-limit
where of
a
the
bounded
[1984], Hale and
equilibrium orbit is
Massatt
a
[1982],
[1981].
Gradient catastrophe
the
where
isolated,
points and
Sard's
the
and
Appendix
of the
statement
The
points
role throughout this chapof a real-valued function
[1963].
In the system are orbit
played
a prominent
consult Milnor [1965] or Smith
the Appendix; Milnor
@)'@)
functions
of
in
gradient.)
study of nondegenerate critical of Morse see the Theory;
A deep
relevant
name
umbilic is stored
elliptic
Notes)
Critical points is the
under the
of the
field
in Poston and
is contained
umbilic
elliptic
vector
gradient
of PHASER
library
Bibliographical
ter.
The
[1978].
systems have theory; Zeeman
see, [1977]. for
diverse
example,
uses.
play They Thorn [1969],
an important Poston and
role
in
Stewart
in Morse In differential topology, especially to anone flows vector fields to take one manifold along gradient theory, as in are in described Milnor Similar ideas used Smale other, [1963]. [1961 in higher In and to affirm the Poincare conjecture dimensions. 1961a] numerical analysis, computing methods under the names \"conjugate graor descent\" essentially consist of flowing dient\" \"steepest along gradient vector fields; see, for example, Conte and deBoor [1972]. Because of the an equilibrium, fact that bounded solutions approach computations yield convergent results. The of a vibrating membrane is studied in Chow, Hale, and example Mallet-Paret is for reaction-diffusion equations [1976]. A good reference Fife [1979]. It is evident that the dynamics of a gradient are essentially system determined by the equilibria and the possible orbits between connecting of This observation can be made and equilibria. precise practical any pair combinatorics. the vertices of a graph One associates by resorting to simple with equilibria and the edges with orbits. Such graphs are used connecting 8.4. All linear whose have all two-dimensional to Peixoto in as explained Figure systems eigenvalues negativeby real (a) gradient flows, classify Hale Peixoto [1973] andtopologically parts-sinks-are equivalent (continued).))) [1977]. It is not possible to characterize all structurally stable systems in dithan two. However, there is a nice result in Smale [1961]))) mensions greater [1978],
and
8.3.
Figure 8.4 Continued. x
T Cx
> 0
for
all
x
(b)
=1= o.
form on
definite
An
saddles
Linear
important
the
k >
any
geometric property of a positive the level set { x : x T Cx = k }, In the lemma below, we origin. with
forms
of
additional
properties
8.15.
Theorem
there
then
a positive
exists Proof.
Without
loss
Normal
Form
Jordan
Case
equivalent.)
topologically
of A have negative real parts, 8.17. If the eigenvalues definite matrix e such that ATe + CA = -I.
Lemma
Case
are
Systems
is that
quadratic plane the 0, is an ellipse encircling establish the existence of some quadratic which will playa role in the proof crucial for
in Linear
Equivalence
Qualitative
(i):
(ii):
A =
(-;'
A = (::::\037
of generality, we may assume and consider three cases: Al -\0372)'
!a)'
0: >
> 0,
A2
0, and
>
O. Take
that
the
f:. O. Take
is in
C = (l/(\037A.)
(3
A
matrix
C =
1/(20:)
l/(\037A2\302\273)'
I.)))
241)
242
8:
Chapter
Linear
Systems)
x2
X
X
2
2
\037
,J
x,
X,
x,
(
\\ -1)0)
(-1 o
x
. . . .
(\037
(\037
-
-
..
.... . . ...
. . .
x 2)
x 2)
2)
.
-)
g))
(-6
(\037
. -
\037 ..
- - - ..
\037
(g
\037))
x 2)
x 2)
-- -
x,
x,
..)
6))
8.5. Phase portraits of classes of planar linear systems.)))
Figure
-
-
..
-
x,
x,
\037))
-
-\037)
(\037
\037)
(-\037
representatives
6))
of topological
equivalence
x
8.3. Case (iii): A =
1/(2A)
c > 0,
any
-1
A TD + DA
c/(2A)
==
-1) )
( cj(2A))
x
\037
l / 2x.
E-
If we
(\037 \037 )x.
A =
let D
=
-E.
introduce the change l / 2 DE- l / 2 possesses
0 and
>
E-
matrix
C
first
main
the proof of our
turn
now
of
co-
the
result
of the
section.
Let us first observe 8.15. that the conditions on the A and B are necessary for topological For equivalence. if a homeomorphism is not difficult to persuade oneself that
Theorem
of
Proof
that
0
properties.
We
1 - [c/(2A)]2 Then the
that
c so
choose
ordinates
desired
I--->
Systems
then)
I,
Now,
x
assume
can
we
of coordinates
transformation
the
by
\037>.)
(-0>'
For (\037O>' \037\\).
in Linear
Equivalence
Qualitative
matrices
coefficient
this purpose, takes a bounded
it
A x to a bounded positive orbit the w-limit set of one the homeomorphism also takes orbit to that of the other. A similar remark holds for a-limit sets positive of bounded orbits also. Consequently, if A has both eigenvalues negative real and A is topologically equivalent to B, then with negative parts every of x == B x approaches zero as t ----* +00. solution both eigenvalues Thus, of B must have negative real parts. A similar argument holds, as t ----* -00, If A if both eigenvalues of A have has one real and positive parts. positive of
==
x
must eigenvalue, then there zero as t ----* approaches
as t
zero
approaches
one
that
B x
==
x
==
then
B x,
one negative of
of x
orbit
positive
----* -00.
one nonequilibrium solution and another solution that
be +00
B must
Consequently,
have one negative and
eigenvalue.
positive
To prove
sufficiency, let us
begin
with
Case
(iii)
as it is the simplest. B have one linear change
we may assume that if A and section, previous and one positive eigenvalue, then they can be put, by negative of coordinates, into the following Jordan Normal Forms:) the
From
Ai > 0
each
linear
scalar
and
differential
J-li
topologically
ilarly, the
scalar
B==
(
\0372) >
O.
Now,
J-ll
o)
,)
:2)
from Section 2.6
recall
that
the
two
: JR ----* JR.
Sim-
equations) ==
Xl
are
,)
o)
( where
-
-AI
A==
equivalent
-AlXl,)
with some
Xl
==
-
J-ll Xl)
homeomorphismhI
equations)
X2 == A2 X 2,)
X2
==
J-l2 X 2)))
243)
244
Linear
8:
Chapter
Systems)
are topologically equivalent via a homeomorphism h2 : of the planar linear x = A x and x = B x are systems with the equivalent homeomorphism) h : JR2 ---+ JR2;
h(x)
= (hI
JR
The
---+ JR.
then
flows
topologically
(Xl), h2 (X2)).)
and construct homeomorphisms to establish of planar linear whose have systems eigenvalues t Case negative real parts. replacing (ii) follows from Case (i) by simply but the with -to The construction below a bit technical, may appear idea behind it is quite simple. For each linear system, find an geometric the that the such each orbit, equilibrium ellipse encircling origin except the ellipse in the same direction and only at one crosses point at the origin, and point. Now, map homeomorphic ally one ellipse to the other, map an orbit through a point on the first ellipse to the orbit passing through the on the second ellipse. extend such a homeomorphism point image Finally, to include the This idea is reminiscent of polar where coordinates origin. the ellipse is the \"angular variable\" and the orbits are the \"radial variable.\" To prove the existence of two ellipses with the desired properties mentioned some ideas from the theory of \"Liabove, we use Lemma 8.17 and functions.\" We will delve into the topic of Liapunov functions in apunov 9. Here, we will be content to point out that if the derivative of a Chapter
now turn
We
the
to
Case
(i)
equivalence
topological
of a linear positive definite quadratic function along the solutions system x = A x is negative, at the then the orbits cross the elliptical except origin, level sets inward. There exist two positive definite symmetric matrices CA and C B such that)
+ CAA
ATCA
Let x( t)
be
d
dt [xT
a solution
(t) C A
x(t)]
of x
= -I,)
= A x,
= xT (t)
BTC B
+
[A TCA + CAA] x(t)
=
_x
T
(t) x(t).)
A x crosses the level sets that any nonequilibrium x T CBx inward see also;
8.6.
a homeomorphism h : JR2 = A x to the orbits of x = B x. Let T I} ---+ {x : x CBx = I} be a given homeomorphism For any xO i= 0, there is a unique time txo such that xl = 1. Now, define the ellipse XTCAx h(xO) = eBtxOh(xl); continuous It is evident, from of solutions dependence in fact, it is a diffeomorphism h is a homeomorphism;
It is
takes
= -I.)
then)
Therefore, any nonequilibrium solution x( t) of x = A similar of x T C AX inward. computation shows solution x( t) of x = B x crosses level sets of the Figure
CBB
the
now
easy
orbits
a diffeomorphism.)))
to define
of x
- 0
---+ JR2
- 0
that
= of the two ellipses. e-AtxoxO lies on Ii : {x
see
: XTCAX
Figure
8.7.
on -.initial data, that if h is chosen to be
8.3.
in Linear
Equivalence
Qualitative
x 2)
Systems
x 2)
x 1)
x 1)
x =
x = Ax)
8.6.
Figure
linear
ative
quadratic
Orbits of
a planar
parts cross the function, ellipses,
linear
system of an
curves
level
Bx)
whose eigenvalues have negdefinite appropriate positive
inward.)
h(x 1 ))
Figure
nar
a
8.7. Constructjng linear systems whose
eigenvalues
have
negative
real
8}. Since
Then
extend
there
the set
is to T {x : x
==
with
to(8)
CBx
==
I}
txo > to, is bounded
two
pla-
parts.)
the domain of the homeomorphism h above to show that h is continuous we define h(O) == O. It remains xO E and consider purpose, suppose that 0 < 8 < 1 is given To
of
the flows
between
homeomorphism
to at
of R 2 , o. For this all
{x : XTCAx < and t o (8) ---+ +00 as 8 ---+ O. by a positive constant, say,)))
245)
246
Linear
8:
Chapter
M, and
Systems)
0 and
some
a, it
k and
constants
positive
that)
follows
Ilh(xO)11
< ke- ato
= IleBtxOh(e-AtxoxO)II
(6)M.)
so long as is 8 > 0 such that Ilh(xO)1I for any \342\202\254 < \342\202\254 > 0, there is norm equivalent to the Euclidean norm, (xO)TCAXO < 8. Since XTCAx h h is continuous at the origin. As we saw in an example above, however, a diffeomorphism at the origin. ) /\302\273){).,
!::,i!\"!!:::f::!:':!! .\".\" \". ...................) ...................... . ....................... ....................... ...............)
.:.:::.:.:.::::::::::::.:....... \" ,) \0370\037jliillli)
Poincare map
8.11.
Figure
The behavior of of the iterates of the
of Eq.
solutions
C : ill?
(8.32),
see
you
linear will
Poincare
undertake a detailed
that
its stability
generalized to
are easily
the
dynamics
map) xO
\037 C
of the
map
of planar
study
ones, in Chapter 15. For find the few remarks below
and
point
xO
ill?;)
in
reflected
,)
linear system
I-periodic
8.11.
Figure
We will the
as the
be viewed
should
which
\037
(8.32) are linear
two-dimensional
linear system.)
a l-periodic
of
have
we planar
the
moment,
acceptable.
developed This maps.
maps, including, of course, however, we trust that The notions of a fixed
3 for
in Chapter essentially
scalar
maps
entails replacing in several norms, Definitions 4.9 and
scalar with and absolute values with quantities vectors, definitions in Chapter 3. With similar replacements, of stability, 4.10 are also readily generalized to yield definitions asymptotic of the I-periodic system (8.32). stability, and instability of a solution A periodic to a fixed point of the solution of Eq. (8.32) corresponds linear and the of the planar map periodic solution of stability type (8.34), is of the fixed the same as the point Eq. (8.32) stability type corresponding in particular of the map (8.34). Notice that the zero solution of Eq. (8.32) to the fixed the of C at the origin. We now summarize point corresponds main implications of these remarks for the zero solution of Eq. (8.32).
Lemma in Eq. (i)
If
Let Then (8.33). 8.22.
IJ.-lil
1, for i
0 such that) Ilg(y)
Returning
to the
II
0energy f is topologis a neighborhood ofx in which then there point ofx satisfied. from of the in Theorem the estimate invariant (9.1) curves. of more 9.3, we have) integrationThen, to the linear vector field x = Df(x)x. () ically equivalent numerical evidence above, the important question Despite the strong t have a first inof point Henon-Heiles Does the Hamiltonian remains: still of the Because of the hyperbolicity x, the homeomorequilibrium (18.4) < Ke-atllyOIl + ds,))) Ke-a(t-s)mlly(s)11 The answer))) h abovethat can isbeIly(t)1I chosen so as independent to preserve parametrization))) phism tegral functionally l alsofrom thethetimeHamiltonian? yet)
+
l
9.1. Asymptotic as long as Ily( s) II inequality with eat
eat
II
(J.L2 - 4m )y\037 > o. origin. In the region in Suppose that yO E n n U. Then the solution through yO remains n as long as y(t) E U. To finish the proof, we observe that the solution V
( C1)
if C2
let
norm has for some value of t, that is, the solution equal to \342\202\254 hit the boundary of U. This follows because there is 6 > 0 such that The of the instability of the proof V(y) > 6 if y E U and V(y) > V(yO). is now complete. 0 equilibrium point of Eq. (9.12) at the origin
through yO must
Example 9.8. bility
type
of the
The
damped
continued:
pendulum
equilibrium points
(n7r,
0)
of Eq.
the n is an
Let us consider (9.8) when
staodd)))
274
Near
9:
Chapter
Equilibria)
Y2)
C, >
C2 >
=
Y2
0)
-Y,)
Y,)
and the
oEV
sets
level
n
region
of Eq. (9.8) at these
linearization
The
integer.
The
9.3.
Figure
where
V(y) >
points
equilibrium
o.)
is the
linear system)
( The
ejgenvalues
of this
linear
J.11,2
one
Since
Theorem
1
0
x. =
w
2
system
= -a:i:
is positive (and eigenvalue 9.7 that these equilibrium
_ 2a can
easily
2 v a
the
x.)
+w
other
points
(9.13))
)
are
be found to
be)
2 .)
is negative),
it
follows
frorn
unstable.
of the we have plotted in Figure 9.4 the phase portraits these unstable one of nonlinear system (9.8) and its linearization near (9.13) is a saddle. Furthermore, equilibrium points. Of course, the linear system is the nonlinear looks much like a saddle also, and the linearization system of the nonlinear near a good reflection of the local phase portrait system of the The preservation of a saddle under small equilibrium. perturbations a linear is true in general and we will explore this fact further in system For comparison,
Section
9.5.
0)
equilibrium point of a nonlinear system cannot linearization. It is evident from Theorems 9.5 always the of such and 9.7 that a situation can occur only if some eigenvalue has linearization has zero real part (and the remaining eigenvalue negative we must examine nonlinear real part). In this case, effects of the specific \\ve terms of the vector field to determine the local dynamics. Indeed, in the saddle-node))) encountered an instance of this difficulty have already
The stability be
determined
type
of
an
from
9.2.
275)
Linearization
from
Instability
/
/')
its
Local phase portraits of the damped near one of the unstable equilibria.)
9.4.
Figure
linearization
bifurcation
9.9.
Example
When
X2
+
X2 = -Xl
of
the
A is
a scalar
harmonic
linear terms. For
was present.
eigenvalue
suffice:
the
Consider
system
equations)
Xl =
where
and
pendulum
eigenvalues:)
does not
linearization
differential
zero
one
where
with purely imaginary
example
of nonlinear
7.23
in Example
given
is an
Here
nonlinear
parameter.
oscillator all
values
AXI (XI
+
These
x\037)
(9.14)) +
AX2(xI
equations
(7.4) but the of A,
+
x\037),)
are a nonlinear does
perturbation
the origin is an
equilibrium
perturbation
not point
affect
the
and
the)))
276
Near
9:
Chapter
linearized
Equilibria)
equation at
the
is, of
origin
course, the harmonic
0
. x =
oscillator)
1
_lOx.))
(
(9.15))
linear system are :f:i, which have zero real parts. we compute of the nonlinear system (9.14), analyze of a solution from the the derivative of the square of the distance origin:) The
eigenvalues
of this
To
the
behavior
d
dt ,\\ < 0, then Ilx(t)112 the equilibrium at the then all solutions of Eq. in this case, Therefore,
If
2
2 =
+
(Xl
2 2 2 ( xl + X2 )
.)
zero
monotonically stable. asymptotically
approaches is
origin
2,\\
X2 )
initial data
with
(9.14)
the origin is unstable.
xO
i=
as t
--+
+00.
'-'Q.o)
9.5. Equilibrium
Consider the
Pol:
der
Van
of
oscillator)
= X2 -
Xl
X2 =
where
A
is a
the
Show that
f(x)
(c) f(x)
Xl))
type
of the
that
the
as a
differential
only equilibrium
function equations
of
point
is at
A.
whose
vector
fields
Xl
=
(
)
+ 5X2
5Xl
+
XI;2 + X2 - X2)
;
)
eXl +X2 - 1
=
.) sin(xl
all equilibrium and determine their - XlX2, (a) Xl = 1 = 2Xl - xI (b) Xl
Find
;
(Xl :22x\037
( 9.7.
der Pol's
below is unstable:
given
(a) f(x) =
(b)
Show
stability
solution
zero
A(xr/3 -
of Van
form
Lienard
-Xl,)
scalar parameter.
Determine its
the origin.
are
0,
0)
Exercises)
9.6.
Thus,
However, if ,\\ > 0 escape to infinity.
+ X2) points stability
X2 = XlX2,
) of the
following systems
of
differential
equations
properties:
Xl -
x\037;
X2 =
-X2 +
XlX2;
(c)Y+iJ+y3=O; Xl = sin(xl + X2), X2 = e 1; = = Xl X2 2X2 - x\037 - x2xf. x\037 XlX\037, (e) Xl of the first three equations. Make sure portraits Try to sketch the phase at each equilibrium to use the information about the linearized equations
(d) Xl
point.)))
9.3.
277)
Functions
Liapunov
9.8. If the origin is a stable but not asymptotically stable equilibrium the planar system x == f(x), can the origin be a saddle point of the
point
of
linearized
equations?)
9.9.
Feedback control:
for the pendulum of length l, mass of the proportional to the velocity in the pendulum pendulum. Suppose now that the objective is to stabilize the vertical position mechanism its a control which can (above pivot) by move the pivot of the pendulum horizontally. Let us assume that f) is the in the clockwise measured direction and th.e angle from the vertical position to linear force v due the control mechanism is a function of f) and f), restoring that is, v(O, 0) == Clf) + c 2 0. Convince yourself that the differential equation)
m, in a
.
..
0+
0) asymptotically
(0,
equation
friction
\"Pole\" placement:
9 sin 0 1:
-
such
of
in such a
be chosen
C2 can
9.10.
mf)
the motion
describes
the
with
Consider
medium
viscous
way
.
1
-
+ C2f))
1:(Clf)
a pendulum. Show so as to make the
cos
f) == 0)
that the
Cl and
constants
point
equilibrium
(f), 9)
==
stable.)
In the
the
above,
problem
linearized
equations had the
form)
x == Ax
+
by,)
b=(\037),)
and
the problem was
the eigenvalues If the
Theorem: is
matrix
matrix
controllable,
A + beT
have
Hint: There
9.3.
the
T
x == ClXl + C2X2 so that A + beT have negative real parts. Prove the
by
choosing
v
==
e
result:
following
above
of
solved
is
negative a vector
(b
then
is nonsingular, that is, the linear system I Ab) there is a vector e such that the eigenvalues of
real parts. e with tr (A
+ beT)
< 0
and det(A
+ beT) >
o.)
Functions
Liapunov
x of a planar system x = For an asymptotically stable equilibrium point estimates it is of considerable practical importance to obtain good f(x), of the the subset of ]R2 of the basin attraction of that x, is, consisting of initial data XO with the property o. The projection of these level in concentric ovals encircling the origin;
sets onto see
Figand
of course, obvious in the examples above, for certain classes of functions known locally
functions\"; namely, those 2 ues of the Hessian matrix (8 V(x)j In this case, the positive. Implicit \"Morse
2
functions
8x i 8xj)
Function
V (x)
for which
evaluated at Theorem
local
the
as
eigenval-
minima
implies that
are these)))
9.3.
279)
Functions
Liapunov
v)
x 2)
V(x 1 ' X 2) =
= V(x 1 ' X 2)
c 2)
c2
= V(x 1 ' X 2)
c 1) x 1)
X 2)
x,)
the
Graph and
9.5.
Figure
Also, one can
are isolated.
minima
local
of a
curves
level
positive
V near
function
definite
origin.)
the minima are diffeomorphic isfactory characterization In
homogeneous
Here is an
variables.
of
level sets of
choice of positive
standard
the
situations,
simple
from
come
the
V near a sat-
However,
positive
definite
available.
is not
function
that
show
to circles; see the Appendix. the level sets of an arbitrary
quadratic polynomials for positive
test
elementary
functions
definite
(quadratic
definiteness
in two
forms)
of such
func-
tions:)
A homogeneous quadratic function V(XI, X2) c are real numbers, is positive + cx\037, where a, b, and - b 2 > o.) only if a > 0 and ac 9.11.
Lemma 2bxIX2
and
= definite
aXI + if
of the on the coefficients; conditions will prove the necessity that V is positive from similar follows reasoning. Suppose sufficiency If X2 =1= 0 is we must have a o. if 0 definite. Since V(XI, > > Xl =1= 0, 0) zeros Xl of be no real for all and there can then 0 > Xl fixed, V(XI, X2)
We
Proof.
the
V(XI, be
X2).
Thus
negative.
0
Now, we
the x =
the
would
level
sets
f(x),
then)
of
discriminant
like
to
4(b
2
-
ac) of
this quadratic function must
how the solutions of x = f(x) cross definite function V. If x( t) is a solution of
determine
a positive
8V
V(x(t)) = a Xl
(x(t))
Xl(t)
+
8V a X2)
(x(t)) X2(t).
(9.16))))
280
9:
Chapter
Near
Equilibria)
xO)
= k)
V(x)
= k)
V(x)
V(x)
V(XO)=O)
V(XO) 0, the orbit is crossing the level curve are shown in Figure 9.6. With these These three observations, possibilities is quite plausible: the following basic theorem of Liapunov
Theorem and V be
9.12.
(i) IfV(x) (ii) If V (x) (iii)
IfV(x)
Let x = 0 be an equilibrium point C 1 function on a neighborhood
(Liapunov)
definite
a positive
< 0
for
0
x
E U
x E
for x E
- {O}, then
U U
-
{O},
then
{O}, then
0
= f(x)
ofi. U
of
O.
is stable.
0 is
asymptotically
0 is
unstable.)
stable.
of the geometric remarks we will give a formal above, proof of the be small so that the Let \342\202\254 0 > neighborhood only. sufficiently in U. Let m be is contained origin consisting of the points with Ilxll < \342\202\254 = of this the minimum value of V on the boundary \342\202\254 neighborhood. Ilxll = \342\202\254 is closed definite and the set Ilxll and bounded, Since V is positive that such we have m > O. Now choose a 8 with 0 < 8 < \342\202\254 V(x) < m for = O. < is with 8. a 8 exists because V continuous Such always V(O) IIxll = xO satisfies of i. = f(x) with If Ilxoll < 8, then the solution x(t) x(O) < V(xO) for that for t > 0 since V(x(t)) < 0 implies V(x(t)) Ilx(t)11 < \342\202\254 t > O. This proves the stability of the equilibrium point at the origin. 0, there is a 8 > largest
0
eigenvalue of B, V(x)
+
2x
that
such
T
Bg(x).
Ilg(x)1I < mllxll if
then)
< -(1
-
T 2{3m)x x.)))
IIxll
0 for all x EOn U, then the origin is an unstable equilibrium point. (ii) V(x)
for
x on
all
of
0 inside
U;
illustrated in Figure 9.8 a typical situation dethe property (i), there are points in 0, hence that are arbitrarily close to the origin. From (ii) and (iii), no orbit of these from of 0 in U. points in 0 can cross the boundary starting anyone also from such orbits must leave the U Thus, neighborhood through (iii), 0. Consequently, the origin is an unstable equilibrium
X2
x E 0, and V(x) V along the solutions
the
and
x\037/2
-Xl
open
-1,
eigenof
none
region)
}.)
on the
== 0
the
Therefore, let us
is applicable.
X2) : Xl >
{ (Xl,
V(x) > 0 for of derivative
the origin. Notice that since at the origin are 0 and
sections
two
previous
function
the
consider
field
vector
linearized
theorems
the
at
point
equilibrium
285)
Functions
Liapunov
Next,
boundary. differential
of the
we
equations
above:)
It
is not
estimate)
.
X2) >
V(XI,
0 is small. By
c >
a quadratic
in
form
0
xI,
4 -
X\037) +
2
(1 +
x\037.
the
right-hand
it is
easy to
and thus
X2,)
side of
V(x)
E 0.
x
this inequality as
> 0 for x in a Now, the conditions
that
see
for
the
2
+
x I
c)IX2I
in particular,
and,
are satisfied
9.17
Theorem
==
Xl
viewing
and
IX21
of x
neighborhood of
-
X2(X\037
a sufficiently
in
where
-
xi
obvious that we are in the realm of Cetaev's theorem. small neighborhood U of the origin, we have the
immediately
However,
==
X2)
V(XI,
is unstable.
origin
0) .-.(/.0)
Exercises)
9.11.
Graphics: Computer
V(Xl,
X2)
==
V(Xl,
X2)
==
itive
definite.)
X\037
9.14. No
linear
determining cause the quadratic
(a) Xl
Use an
-
show
CX2
== ==
X\037+
+
(1
capabil-
2x\037; \037X\037;
\037X\037
-
COSXl).
where these
origin
a
are
functions
of odd
polynomial
pos-
degree can-
> 0,
the
-X\037 +
==
-X\037 + 2x\037,
(c) Xl
==
-
XlX\037,
X\037,
X2 == -2X\037X2 X2 == -2XlX\037;
consult
-
types x\037;
X2 == XlX\037 + 2X\037X2 + X\037.)))
system
of the
Section 8.3. is of no
linearization
below,
of the
\037 +00.
equilibrium point at is the zero matrix.
Jacobian matrix at the origin functions, determine the stability
==
solution
every
origin as t function;
quadratic
For the three systems the stability type of the
of Xl.)
power
for c
that,
part:
X\037
XlX2 + + \037X\037
homogeneous
approaches
appropriate
Xl
(b)
the
and factor out
9.12 to
== X2, X2 == -Xl
Suggestion:
of
x\037+
X2)
X2)
V(Xl,
X\037;
Show that a
== aXl,
X2
Use Theorem Xl
==
V(Xl,
of
graphs
definite.
positive
Hint: Take
X2)
V(Xl,
2)2;
neighborhoods
Odd polynomials: be
of a
4x\037;
a very
a standard
locate
+ X+ +
Find
not 9.13.
(Xl
X2) == X\037 the largest
V(Xl,
9.12.
x\037 +
useful tool for plotting package with 3-D graphics few functions, for example, is
graphics
functions. You should ities and plot the graphs
the However,
origin:
in
help
origin
beusing
286
Near
9:
Chapter
9.15. After
Equilibria)
the
Consider
Dirichlet:
and
Lagrange
Xl = X2,
=
X2
conservative
system)
-g(Xl),)
l
say, C . isolated minimum point Xl of the potential function xl du to a stable point equilibrium corresponds (Xl, 0) of the g(u) fo
where the
(a)
function
9 is,
each
that
Show
system. See
Help:
(b) Give
an
function 9 such that Xl is not a minimum and yet (Xl, 0) is a stable equilibrium point.
of a
function
potential
Hint: Try a 9.16.
14.
Chapter example
V(Xl,
X2) =
original
the
9.17. Consider
Can
X2).
-X\037V(Xl,
the
function.
nonanalytic
Suppose that you have the function whole (Xl, x2)-plane and that relative of the
of
differential
equation?
defined V(Xl, X2) = x\037e-Xl to some planar differential
you conclude anything about If not, what is the trouble?
the
on the equation solutions
of equations)
system
Xl =
X2
-
Xl!(Xl,
X2)
- x2f(xl,
X2 = -Xl
X2),)
Notice that the origin is an equilibrium real-valued C l function. function, point independent of the specific form of !. U sing a quadratic of the origin, then show that if f(xl, neighborhood X2) > 0 in some open the origin is asymptotically stable. What is the stability type of the origin if ! (Xl, X2) < 0 in a neighborhood of the origin?
is a
where!
9.18.
origin is an unstable
the
that
Show
.
= Xl3
Xl
.23 = -X2
+
X2
. V(Xl,
in a 9.19.
small
Actual determine of
the
6 X2) = Xl
+
>
-
x\037
basin of attraction: the largest
-
=
-
(1 +
the
= -Xl
X2 = =
1/9.)))
xt /4
x\037/2 2
+
Xl
-
show) X2)
> 0)
the
the basin 2 X2
-2X2 +
-
and
\037x\037
function
+
Xl')
+ x2(1
Xl)
origin, except
Using
.
x\037/4
X2)
+ XlX2
ellipse contained in
system)
+
X2
3 X2 X l
of the
neighborhood
xI/2
+
\037IX211xl13
Xl
Answer:
XlX2
the function V (Xl,
Consider
Hint:
for the system)
point
equilibrium
3x\037.)
origin
V(Xl,
itself. X2)
=
of attraction
xI/2 + of the
x\037/4,
origin
9.4.
to convince yourself that the than this is ellipse. However, origin larger there are other equilibrium because points.)
Experiment tion of the plane
that
Suppose
: IR \037 IR,
1/;
a
1---+
1/;(0'), ds
> 0 if a -# 0, and satisfying 1/;(0) = 0, 0'1/;(0') J: 1/;(s) with kp > 0, show constants For k, c, and p positive +00. of the indirect control problem)
-kx -
x =
=
\037,
\037
a = ex
1/;(0'),)
01
is a
entire
function
as
\037 +00
that
-
of attrac-
not the
it is
287)
Principle
basin
actual
numerically
control:
Indirect
9.20.
lnvariance
An
\037
10'1
solution
every
p\037,)
zero as t \037 +00. above control\" comes from the fact that in the system label \"indirect of the state variable the control variable \037is not given directly as a function another differential equation. In it is determined indirectly using X; instead, indirect control turns out to be very efficient; on related certain situations, matters, see, for example, Lefschetz [1965].) approaches
The
Invariance
An
9.4.
In this
section,
of the
discussion
detailed
exposition
in a
setting
the
case of
to
specialize
of Liapunov functions with a more stable of an asymptotically
our study
basin
In preparation
point.
equilibrium
Principle)
continue
we
is
that
attraction
of
for later chapters, we will commence for general limit sets and
equilibrium
points.)
U of JR2 is said to be spectively, negatively invariant] under the flow
see
Let
setting.
general
f be
a given C k
with
function,
1,)
--t JR?;
f : JR?
x
r--+
f(x),)
satisfying) ==
f(O)
0,)
the planar system of
and consider
Xl
==
X2
==
To bring the linear part of this in vector notation:)
differential
(10.1))
equations
X2)
!1(XI, -X2
== 0)
Df(O)
+ !2(XI,
system
(10.2))
X2).
to the
let
forefront,
us write
it,
for
a moment,
x= (\037
\037l)X+f(X).
the linear part of the vector field about the equilibrium point Form with eigenvalues at the origin is in Jordan Normal 0 and -1. In apthe linearization of a vector field with one zero and one negative plications, Notice
eigenvalues
that
may
such a vector
not
field
coordinates and a
can
always come in normal be put into this always
rescaling
of
the
independent
form form
[Eq. with
variable
(10.2)]; a linear t.)))
however,
change of
294
9:
Chapter
Near
Equilibria)
x2
X21
I
/
/ I I
/' /----t--........ I\037
W
(0, U)
l
\"\\
I
I
t I
and
its
With
\\ \\
\\ \\ \"
I
/
WS(O,U))
(0, U)
I
t I
/
x,
/ WS (0, U)
....._--,-/../)
The local stable and near the origin.)
9.11.
Figure
I
.//
--l/
U
'\\
I ,
\"
I
'........
u!
II x,)
I
W
\037
//'/-\\ \\ \\)
4
U
U
local
of Eq.
manifolds
unstable
(9.21)
linearization
the
noteworthy
intent
of obtaining a of
features
the
example
general
above.
let
result,
The
local
us isolate
stable
several
[respectively,
manifold of the origin of the nonlinear system is a smooth graph of the linearized manifold sys[respectively, unstable] tem. Furthermore, the local stable [respectively, unstable] manifolds of the at the equilibrium point. nonlinear system and its linearization are tangent of the phase portrait If linearization is to reflect the qualitative features in near an equilibrium we expect of a nonlinear system point, then, general, The theorem below secures that this is indeed these observations to be true. we that since linearization is a local process, the case. We should emphasize unstable]
over
the
local stable
can expect success only locally above is a bit too example are
graphs
globally.
where this is not state our general
the local
near special;
an equilibrium local stable
its
Later in this section, we will case, and explore this issue theorem.)))
point. In this sense, and unstable manifolds present further.
other But,
the
examples let us
first,
9.5. By an
Al < 0,
where
Dg(O) =
to the
planar
dif-
saddle
can
general
origin is a
form\
\"normal
Xl =
AlXl +
X2 =
A2 X 2
gl (Xl,
X2)
+ g2(Xl,
0, and the function the local stable that
>
A2
Notice
o.
a
whose
f(x)
be transformed
always
of a
of coordinates, change at the linearization
linear
appropriate
equation x =
ferential
Saddle
Preservation
(9.22)) X2),)
g
satisfies
g2)
(gl,
and unstable
= 0,
g(O) of
manifolds
the
at the origin are, respectively, the Xl- and x2-axis. Let us into the normal has been now that our differential put suppose equation form (9.22). Then we have the following theorem:
linearization
Theorem 9.29. neighborhood U local
a8>
(9.22), there is {(Xl, X2) : IXll < 8, IX21 < of the equilibrium point manifolds
unstable
the
For
system
-
U)
WS(O,
WU(O, U)
= {(Xl,
X2)
X2 =
= {(Xl,
X2)
Xl
8}
at
hs(Xl),
= hu (X2),
where the functions hs and hu are as smooth as the Furthermore, they satisfy) = 0,
h s (0)
hu (0)
=
dhs
= 0,
(0)
0,)
such
0
that,
the
are
origin
IXll
0, J-t >
> (1 -
x 2)
x v=o)
v=o)
2)
f)
e
Pe
e'
x, P
e)
,
f')
9.13.
Figure
saddle the
level
the existence of the stable The diagonal Principle. the quadratic function V.)
Proving Wazewski's
using
of
curves
is a point pe remains in
3. There
with
similar
Pe on
the
square
that the O.
There
and
of a
hyperbolic
hyperbolas
solution
is also
c.p(t, pe)
a
point
two pieces of the side e such that solutions via the side I, and the solutions piece leave the square Use continuity via the side I'. the other piece leave the square to initial data. respect Show that c.p(t, Pe) -+ 0 as t -+ +00. one
Hint: 5. The similar
Use
are
through on e'
Pe'
properties.
Consider
Hint:
4.
the side e such for all t >
manifold lines
fact
the
point Pe
is
properties.)))
through through with
V(c.p(t, pe)) -+ 0 as t \037 +00. on e. There is also a unique point Pe' on e' with
unique
268
9:
Chapter
Equilibria)
To study
Proof
the
x(t) -
y(t) = y =
point
point x
the equilibrium
that
so
0 of the
differential
f(y + the
=
x)
written
are
since
in the
going
of Eq. (9.3) is For
corresponds
g(y) = 0
f(x) =
0,
equilibrium
can
we
the function
expand
future
and
Dg(O) =
(9.2))
y =
equation
f(y +
be
can
x)
+ g(y).)
to prove the theorem by showing
asymptotically stable. we note
reference,
to the
II
that
the
(9.3))
that
solution
the
(9.2)
properties
\"small\" compared to y. More Theorem for any m > that,
< fJ} such that)
-'l/J(Xl) +
The latter
Eigenvalue)
is
a C
k+
as
O(IX\037+ll)
l
function
Xl
\037
with)
0,
(10.5))
a =1= 0 is a real number, k is a positive integer, and 'ljJ( Xl) is as of the planar in the equilibrium point at the origin Eq. (10.3). Then given if and k is an is stable a 0 odd integer; < system Eq. (10.2) asymptotically where
otherwise, it is
Prool.
It is
unstable.
convenient
to introduce the
y =
variables
new
(Yl,
Y2)
defined
by)
Xl = Yl, In
these
the original
variables
=
Y2 +
'ljJ(Yl).
system (10.2)
Yl = Y2
X2
91 (Yl,
= -Y2
becomes)
Y2)
(10.6))
+ 92(Yl,
Y2),)
where)
Y2) =
fl(Yl,
'ljJ(Yl)
+
Y2)
92(Yl, Y2) = 12(Yl, 'ljJ(Yl)
+
Y2)
9l(Yl,
-
'ljJ' (Yl)
11 (Yl,
-
12(Yl, 'l/J(Yl))
'ljJ(Yl)
+
Y2).)
The stability properties of the equilibrium point y = 0 of Eq. (10.6) are the same as those of the equilibrium point x = 0 of Eq. (10.2). concern a sufficiently small neighSince the conclusions of the theorem to determine the borhood of the origin, we proceed, as you might suspect, of these about the origin. functions first several terms of the Taylor series
Using Eqs.
(10.5)
and
9l(Yl,
Y2) =
92(Yl,
Y2)
=
as
we obtain,
(10.4),
ay\037 [1
0
+ 0 (lIyll)]
(Iy\037+ll)
+
\037
Ilyll
Y2 0
+
Y2
0,)
0 (llyll) (10.7))))
(1Iyll).)
10.1. Stability us now
Let
consider the
function
V ( YI, Y2 ) and
Eq. (10.7), V(YI,
we
that
==
[1 +
_y\037k
If
'ljJ: {A
:
is a
F
> 0 and a IIAII
equations)
Xl,
(A,
determine the small values of We begin our analysis with a lemma points of the system (10.11) in terms of F
where
(10.10))
X2)
Xl,
FlCX,
== o.)
Df(O)
0,
differential
of
system
==
f(O)
X2),)
of equibifurcations A. the equilibrium determining
the
parameter
for
>
k
of a
zeros
the
Ok function,
the
of
nature
1,
then
scalar equation. there are
constants
function)
Ok
AO} X {Xl
O. bifurcation
1 )
COS(XI
COS(XI
a saddle-node
undergoes
-
-
is now in
(10.19)
system
_
(
equivalently)
ses of Theorem
the
p-l
x + \0371)
(\037
The
-1
1
0
becomes)
(10.18)
x = or
eigenval-
and (-1, 1).
variables)
of
( then
(1, 0)
eigenvectors
P==
Px,)
observe that its
Form,
corresponding
the transformation
make
if we
Therefore,
the
is)
origin
Normal
Jordan
0 and
are
ues
matrix
The coefficient
point.
!1).)
(\037
To put
urn
If
we
IX
II)3),)
substitute
Taylor series of the
cosine,
this
ex-
then
a
(10.21
))))
yields)
AXI +
\037XI
+
O((IAI
+
IXII)3).)
10.2. Bifurcations the form of
From
the vector is
function
bifurcation
field
Xl)
G(>\",
Eq. (10.20) it is clear that the the scalar differential
and
(10.19)
=
Therefore
Xl).
1jJ(>..,
319)
equation (10.15) becomes) =
Xl
By appealing ria of Eq.
to
(10.22) at
bifurcation
>..
Using the
-
>.. +
2.3, you near the origin, = o. 0
and their
torque.
The
With
to be determined. of center manifolds.)
remains theory
stability
this
of a
presence
(10.19) near the
of Eq.
flow
complete
of equilib-
bifurcations
the the
(10.22))
saddle-node
succeeded in accounting for the of the damped pendulum with
we have
function
bifurcation
0((1>\"1 + IXII)3).)
+
\037X\037
should analyze and confirm
Section
of equilibria
bifurcations
+
>\"XI
\037>..2
purpose
still
however,
origin,
in mind,
to
we now turn
Exercises)
the
-'Q'O)
the
10.6. Draw
bifurcation
for the
diagrams
equilibrium
of the
solutions
following
systems:
10.7.
(a) Xl
=
(b) (c)
= X2, = 3AXl
Xl Xl
Analyze
-X2,
X2 = '\\Xl X2 = -X2 - 3AX2 -
-
+ x\037
the equilibrium
X2; x\037
-
X2 =
10.8.
Consider
origin
for
A;
their
and
-
AXI
-
(A
the following system
x\037 +
2XlX2
1)x2 +
x\037 +
on
depending
J.L
. X2 =
-
3 Xl X2
bifurcation curves approximate equilibria near (0, 0). Also sketch each region of the parameter space. the
for the for 10.9.
Odd
F2
in
symmetry: Suppose Eq. (10.11) satisfy, Fi(A,
1. Show
that x that
=0
a scalar
A is for
i =
3.
If {)2G(0, O)/{)A{)Xl bifurcation pitchfork
function
i= 0 and
at
Xl near
the
system)
XlX2,)
two
A. A and
parameters
J.L:)
+ XlX2 2 Xl
+
\\ A.)
the origin in the ('\\, phase representative
parameter and the
functions
J.L)-plane portraits
Fl
and
-Fi(A,
Xl,
X2).)
a solution.
is always
Show
2 XlX2
the
of
2,)
-X2) =
-Xl,
the bifurcation
2.
1,
types
parameter
2
-X2 +
X2.
stability
values of the scalar
small
. Xl =
Find
AXI -
X2 =
x\037,
points
Xl =
near the
-
,\\ =
G(A,
Xl) is
{)3G(0, O)/{)x\037 O.)))
odd in
i= 0,
Xl.
show that
there
is
a
320
4.
Presence
In the
10:
Chapter
Eigenvalue) functions in all analytic is also analytic. Using Xl)
and F 2 are function G(>\",
that
Suppose
a Zero
of
Fl
the bifurcation
that if 8 2 G(0, 0)/8>..8xl i= 0, then either there at >.. == 0, or G(>\", Xl) - 0 for>.. == O. 10.10.
is a
that>.. Even symmetry: Suppose and F2 in Eq. (10.11) satisfy, for
1. Show
that
G(>\",
If 8G(0, 0)/8>.. node bifurcation
i=
Xl) is 0 and
at
== F i >.., Xl, (
X2)
Consider
where cuss
the planar
Fl
X2).)
show
that
is a
there
saddle-
show that
i= 0,
0)/8>..
there is
a saddle-
system)
Xl
==
11 (Xl,
X2)
X2
==
J.LX2 +
lIXl + 12(Xl,
f(O) == 0, Df(O) == 0, and the stability properties of the
and compute the bifurcation form. Then normalize function How do the again.
J.L i=
0 and
the two
0 are given constants. Disbe daring at the origin. First, into part putting the linear
part and compute
linear
cases
X2),)
1I i=
equilibrium without function
normal
10.12.
functions
the
and
show bifurcation fact,
o.
3. If G(>\", Xl) is analytic and 8G(0, node bifurcation at >.. == o.) 10.11.
a pitchfork
scalar parameter
even in Xl. 8 2 G(0, 0)/8x\037 i= 0,
>.. ==
this
i == 1, 2,)
F i ( >.., - Xl,
2.
is
Then
variables.
the
bifurcation
compare?
of the origin, obtain Bifurcation from a simple eigenvalue: In a neighborhood those values Q == Q* (x\037) such that the following system has an equilibrium point on the line Xl == X\037:) Xl
== QXl
+ 11 (Xl,
X2)
+/2(Xl,
X2),)
X2 == -X2 where
equili
bria
(the
Xl )-plane
in the
Observe
Hint:
and
== 0
f(O)
the (Q,
10.13.Let
usual way. the sign
that
Theorem 10.8.
Df(O) == O. Draw some possible curves the stable bifurcation curve) and label of 8G/8xl
is the
sign
of
Q == Q*(Xl)
in
and unstable
-(Q*)'(x\037)x\037 and
use
functions of paramea 2 x 2 matrix whose entries are continuous the eigenvalues of A(O) are distinct, show that the eigenvalues of >.. == O. of >.. in a neighborhood of A(>\") are continuous functions of real eigenvalues If J.Ll (>..) and J.L2(>\") are Hint I: (For real eigenvalues) == and then that the line tr A(O) implies J.Ll (0) + J.L2(0) J.Ll (0) i= J.L2(0) A(>\,") the hyperbola det A(O) == J.Ll (0)J.L2 (0) intersect at two points. (Draw their persists. pictures.) For>.. i= 0 and small, the picture Hint II: Show that [tr A(>..)]2 - 4 det A(>\") i= 0 at >.. == O. == 0 and Hint III: Let us suppose that Ao is A(>\") == Ao + B(>\,") where B(O) of how))) a diagonal matrix of the form Ao == diag (J.L\037,J.Lg). Here is an outline A(>\") be
ters>..
E
:IRk. If
10.3. Center the
to use for
small
A
of bifurcation
method =1= o. A
number
nonzero vector x == is equivalent to the pair
is a
there
which
function to find is an eigenvalue (Xl, X2) such that
(A)Xl +
[J.Lg
(A)]Xl
+
J.L\037 v
+
b ll
-
result
the bifurcation equation conclude, with Theorem, that v can be determined as
to n x n
applicable
J.L\037I
J.L\037
if and -
only if == x 0, vI]
b 12
(A)X2
== 0
== O.)
b22(A)]X2
the help a function
of
of Xl.
Substitute From
equation.\"
the of
Function
Implicit A.
This
method
is
matrices.)
Manifolds)
Center
10.3.
[A(A)
near
J.Ll
of A(A)
second equation solve for X2 as a linear function into the first equation to obtain the \"bifurcation
the
From
the
eigenvalue
of equations)
[-v + b 2l
an
== + v J.L J.L\037
321)
Manifolds
In this section, we determine fine structures of flows and bifurcations near an equilibrium point at which matrix the of the linear approximation has with one zero and one negative eigenvalue. Our presentation resembles, manifolds near a certain added complications, that of stable and unstable center In fact, we will see that there is some invariant curve-local saddle. the to to line the manifold-tangent containing eigenvectors corresponding the zero eigenvalue of the linearized vector field. Since the other eigenall orbits starting near the origin this invariant value is negative, approach curve. The qualitative behavior can then of the local flow on the plane scalar differential equation be determined from the flow of an appropriate on the center we will manifold. To fix the main ideas in a simple context, we first describe the theory of center manifolds for Eq. (10.2). Eventually, will generalize the setting to the parameter dependent equation (10.11) to definition of local Let us begin with a precise study its local bifurcations. center manifolds for Eq. (10.2). is said to . WC(O,
be
a solution x(t) E
.
A Ck
10.12.
Definition
U)
curve
WC(O,
U) in
a neighborhood U
of
manifold for Eq. (10.2) under the flow of Eq. (10.2) with the initial value
Eq.
U) as long as x(t) E k is a graph of a C function WC(O, U) a.t the origin, that is,) Xl -axis WC(O,
WC(O,
where the function
U)
==
{(Xl,
origin
that is, if x(t) is U), then
(10.2),
E WC(O,
x(O)
U;
h(XI)
X2
X2)
of the
if
center is invariant
a local
==
h(XI),
==
X2 and
(Xl,
is tangent
to the
X2) E U},)
h satisfies)
h(O)
==
0,)
\037(O) aXI)
= o.
(10.23))))
322
10:
Chapter
Presence
In the
a Zero
of
Eigenvalue)
we will usually omit the word \"local\" the To U. appreciate origin neighborhood let us reexamine with center manifolds, some of the subtleties associated Example 10.1, and inspect Figures 10.1 and 10.2 a bit more closely. If there is
no
to the
10.13.
Example
of confusion,
chance
reference
the
and
and
center
Many
.
where a is a given real number. values of a and the linearization
Xl
== ax
X2
==
x.
==
(
system)
3 I (10.24))
-X2,)
The
is an
origin the
at
the product
Consider
manifolds:
origin
0
0
0
-1
equilibrium
point
for
all
is)
x.)
)
to the zero eigenvalue contains the eigenvectors corresponding xl-axis is a and is the center manifold of the linearized system. Since Eq. (10.24) product system, it is clear that the graph of h( Xl) == 0, which is the xl-axis, manifold is a center of Eq. (10.24). All orbits approach this center manifold fast and the flow of the planar exponentially system looks essentially like the flow of the scalar differential Xl == axr on the center Inanifold. equation and unstable center manifolds are not Unlike the stable manifolds, In fact, it is apparent from 10.1 that when a < 0 unique. Figure always the union of an orbit from the left half-plane and an orbit from the right with the origin, is also a center of Eq. (10.24). manifold half-plane, together More specifically, it is easy to determine that for two constants CI and any the of the function) C2 graph The
h(Xl)
==
{
l 2ax i) Cl e /(
if Xl
< 0
0
if
== 0
C2 e
l /( 2ax
i))
Xl
if Xl
>
0)
to notice, however, a center manifold of Eq. (10.24). It is important that on all of these center manifolds the flows are equivalent. Consequently, it is inconsequential of the dynamics for the qualitative study which center is we use. manifolds manifold coexistence of center Nevertheless, many for concern as it frequently is troublesome to compute a potential cause entities. We will address this issue later in this section. 1. Then,
a center ---+
comfort of this theorem, let power series of the apparent
us
Manifolds
(10.2). Suppose as Xl ---+ 0,)
that
k ).)
O(IXll
to Figure
return
manifold
center
10.2 and
deter-
a cubic
resembling
curve.)
Continuation
10.18.
Example
of the partial
differential
of Example
=
h(XI)
Thus the
manifold
center
the
on
flow
-x\037
+
10.3: The
in this
(10.27)
equation
solution
series by)
O(IXI14).) by the
determined
is
power
case is given
scalar differential
equation)
Xl
=
ax\037 +
=
xlh(XI)
ax\037
-
x1 + O(IXI15).)
It is interesting to notice that the vector field of this scalar differential terms order four as the ones we have up through equation has the same obtained earlier using the method of bifurcation function. 0 We now
the
generalize
of center
theory
to
manifolds
systems
of differ-
and investigate the depend parameters, (10.11) near the for small A. This bifurcations extension possible origin may appear to consist of insertion of a A or two into the previous definitions formally For the sake of completeness, and theorems. we will make such insertions. a geometric center From manifolds become considpoint of view, however, in the of parameters: for each small A presence erably more complicated there is a curve, and the collection of these curves form a surface-a center ential equations
manifold.
Here
the
. .
precise definition:
is the
Definition 10.19. of
on
which
curves W{(O, U) in a neighborhood U manifold for Eq. (10.11) if under the flow of Eq. (10.11), that is, ifx(t) is a solution of Eq. (10.11) with the initial value x(O) E W{(O, U), then x(t) E W{(O, U) as long as x(t) E U; = X2 and, for A = 0, is Xl) h(A, W{(O, U) is a graph of a Ok-function to the -axis the at that Xl is,) origin, tangent A
family
is said to be origin U) is invariant W{(O,
W{(O,
where the
function
U)
of Ok
center
a local
= {
(Xl,
X2)
: X2
= h(A,
Xl),
(Xl,
X2)
E U},)
h satisfies)
h(O, 0)
=
0,)
_8h
= 8 Xl) (0, 0)
O.
(10.30))))
325)
326
10:
Chapter
In the
Presence of a
Zero
Eigenvalue)
X2
A)
10.3.
Figure
To
}-X
appreciate
when a vector
field
10.20.
Example
1
The inclined plane is
some
a
of the subtleties
depends
Consider
manifold
center
associated
of Example
with
let us examine
on parameters,
center several
10.20.)
manifolds examples.
the product system \302\267
Xl =
-Xl
=
-X2
X2
3
+ A,
is the graph of h( A, Xl) = where A is a scalar parameter. A center manifold on the center manifold is given by Xl = -X\037. On the A and the flow manifold is the family of horizontal lines X2 = A (Xl, x2)-plane this center this center manifold in by A. It is more revealing to visualize parametrized in Figure it is the inclined 10.3. The intersecthe (A, Xl, x2)-space: plane are the family of lines X2 = A. tions of the inclined plane with vertical planes is to the xl-axis at A = o. 0 The plane of the center manifold tangent
Example
10.21.
Consider
the
linear
system
Xl = 0 X2
where which plane.
surface\"
=
AXI
-
X2,
is given a scalar parameter. A center manifold by h(A, Xl) = AXI, family of rotating lines given by X2 = AXI on the (Xl, X2)ruled this center manifold is the \"hyperbolic In the (A, Xl, X2 )-space in Figure 10.4. 0))) depicted
A is
is a
10.3. Center
327)
Manifolds
X 2
h,
A)
reads
The ruled surface is
10.4.
Figure
The existence as follows:)
theorem for
small
neighborhood
manifold
center
attracting
be
(10.11) in
origin
10.21.)
of Example
manifold
center
the vector field U of the
Let
10.22.
Theorem ficiently
an
a
Ok and
JR2.
Then,
for
Eq.
(10.11)
consider a for
of there exists a local center manifold W{ in U consisting of the graph for any solution x(t) with initial function h(A, Xl) = X2. Moreover, that) E U there are positive constants a and /3 such x(O)
IX2(t) as long
Despite
possible implies
be on any Because of
center
nonuniqueness the
manifold.
W{ is attracting xO E U must be we
have
lxl(O)
-
h(A,
a Ok value
(10.31))
xl(O))1)
0)
following
of center
manifolds,
property
of any center
attraction
the
point of Eq. (10.11)in
An equilibrium
10.23.
Corollary
dimensional,
U.
13t
< ae-
xI(t))1
h(A,
as x(t) E
timate (10.31)
w(xO)
-
suf-
small,
IIAII
es-
manifold:
U
must
always
0) all
in
solutions
W{.
the following
in U, the omega limit set w(xO) is invariant and W{ is one
starting
Since result:)))
328
10:
Chapter
Presence
In the
a Zero
of
10.24. The omega Corollary Eq. (10.11) with initial value
This corollary enables us to rather easily because origin Another
it
10.25.
asymptotically
on the center
==
only if the
is stable
by h
(10.32))
the
now substitute
equation (10.11), then Xl) +
F2 (A,
to the
subject
8h
a center
solution
ables
A
h(A,
of Eq. and
Xl)
where the series into equating
Xl ==
initial
defining
.
\\
for
Xl and
X2
partial
differential
differential
by the
given
equation)
_
==
FI(A,
Xl)
(A,
8 Xl)
Xl, h(A,
Xl)) (10.33)
values)
manifold
0)
(10.33),
==
_8h
8 Xl) (0, 0)
0,)
defined
we
Xl). In Xl) into
h(A,
by
h(A,
expand
== 0
search a power
an
of
series
approximate in the vari-
as)
CIOA
+
C20 A2
Cij
+ CIIAXI
are
to be
differential
partial
+
C02 X
I +
O((IAI +
determined.
equation
We
(10.33)
manifolds
power series method
now
IR
(10.34))
lI)3),)
this
substitute
and determine
are
not unique,
above
can
Cij
by
the computational effectivebe demonstrated.
again
that) g :
IX
of like terms.
the coefficients
of the
t the
to
respect
8h
Although center ness
differential
partial
of the
expressions
center manifold
of a
( A, Xl ) Xl.
8 Xl)
h(A, Xl))
Xl,
coefficients
the
_
==
a solution
h(O,
yields
asymptotically
[respectively,
the
.
-h(A,
[re-
corresponding
where
0,
0,)
as the
of bifurcation
IXII)3) .) ones
we
have
functions.
obtained
Therefore, the full to construct it is now quite easy manifold theory using the center recover To on the flow of the system of equations (Xl, x2)-plane. (10.19) that))) all coordinates the dynamics of the pendulum in the original (YI, Y2), in Example
330
remains to
To
of
in
in the
and
of
a zero
this
with
chapter
of the differences, let us reconsider that the stability properties 10.4, as the zero solution at the origin are the same
Theorem
eigenvalue-
obvious similar-
their
Despite
We conclude
==
also
the graph Theorem 10.4 relies once the result is
of
'ljJ)
( 10.36))
== O.)
the
that
know
(10.2). equilib-
of)
+ f2 (Xl,
same statement
is true
relative
equation)
Xl
where
a brief
of)
'ljJ(Xl)),)
fl(Xl,
solution
is the
'ljJ(Xl)
of the
Eq.
of the
know
10.15, we
equilibria
sta-
for investigating
methods
presence
manifolds.
ways.
-'ljJ
the
matrix P
methods.
we
where the function
From
by the
shearing
two
chapter
center
Xl
to
of
effects
some
understand
point
Eigenvalue)
equilibria
subtle
of the two
Theorem
rium
undo the
function and differ
comparison From
a Zero
presented in this
bifurcations
bifurcation
ities, they
of
1.) function
'ljJ is usually
much
Exercises)
10.14.
Many center
I-Q.0) manifolds:
Find
all center .
Xl
==
manifolds
2 Xl)
X2 == -X2.)))
of
the
system)
10.3. Center 10.15. Draw some center
of the
manifolds
331)
Manifolds
system)
.
2 Xl)
\\ == /\\ +
Xl
X2 == -X2)
in the
10 .16 .
No
Put
x2)-space.
Xl,
('\\,
center manifold:
analytic
. .
X2 is, of
==
system)
3 -Xl 2
== -X2
course, analytic.
+ Xl')
has no analytic
this system
that
Show
manifold.
center
Let h(Xl) == L7=o; i even.)
Hint:
and determine
ci x l
that
== 1,
C2
i odd,
== 0 for
Ci
== iCi for
Ci+2
10.17.
field
the
Consider
Xl
This vector
0 first.
,\\ ==
Show
that the
at the
point
equilibrium
origin
the
of
system)
. 3 2 Xl == XlX2 + aXl + b XlX2 . 2 2 X2 == -X2 + CXl + d XlX2)
stable
10.18.
if either
For Eq. (10.2), let 'l/J(Xl) manifold. Suppose that)
solution
be the
h(Xl))
fl (Xl, with
and
a#-O
b #- O.
Rotated pendulum:
a
movable
joint
and
that
Show
motion of such a pendulum motion of the pendu]um on
as usual, 1. Show that
where,
the
stability
2. If w
Wo,
() is there
the does
k
not
is
== f
and
0 ( IX 11
a
that
and h(Xl)
(10.3),
bx\037 + O(IXll
k+ 1
),)
m and
() -
sin
()
-
---t
origin
as
every
orbit approach
of
the
equation)
mil,)
from
its
rest
equilibrium
position.
and discuss vfiil for all values of w. ==
manifold
+00.
an
The
its pivot.
However, the projection by the differential
t
to
1 hinged
length
w about
velocity
of the pendulum bifurcation at Wo of the equilibrium points every orbit, except the stable t
),
i+l
is governed
() sin
a center
be
== b.
of mass
planar.
a plane
2 w cos
Eq.
the displacement is a pitchfork
properties show
==
with angular
rotated
jj =
of
a pendulum
Consider
methods.)
two
== ax \037+
f 1 ( Xl, 'l/J ( Xl))
10.19.
a+c
unstable if either problem using efforts of your computations in the
2. is
Do this the
2
< 0, or a+c == 0 and cd+bc < 0; 2 a + c > 0, or a + c == 0 and cd + bc > O. bifurcation function and a center manifold. Compare
is asymptotically
1.
point?)))
W
S
(7r, 0),
332
Chapter
10.20.
10:
On the
In the
machine: Plot on the phase
representative
rotated
Bibliographical
Presence of a
pendulum
Notes)
to
portraits observe
Zero
Eigenvalue)
computer,
of the
for example, some PHASER, using damped pendulum with torque and
the bifurcations.)
@)@)
with one zero eigenvalue was inof nonhyperbolic equilibria stability vestigated by Liapunov in 1892. His method of reducing a two-dimensional which to a scalar one has a far-reaching generalization goes under problem A nice exposition of this importhe name of Method of Liapunov-Schmidt. full details are available in Chow and tant method is given in Hale [1984]; For historical Hale reasons, [1985]. [1982] and Golubitsky and Schaeffer you may also like to see Schmidt [1908]. ideas in bifurcation The center manifold is one of the key theory. Althe first of idea had been around a proof complete long time, though the its smoothness in a neighborhood of a nonhyperbolic equilibrium point of in an ordinary differential equation appeared Kelley [1967]. By now, there are of for Carr example, expositions it; see, many [1981]. Center manifolds as well. In fact, differential case are in the of equations partial important is the existence of finite one of the most active areas of current research behavior of partial dimensional manifolds which the asymptotic capture of For reaction-diffusion equations, the existence differential equations. This inertial manifolds-has been proved. global center manifolds-called of an infinite dimensional system to is important in reducing the dynamics and Sell [1989].))) those of a finite dimensional one; see Mallet-Paret
The
11
of
Presence
the
In
Imaginary
Purely
Eigenvalues)
1 In I:
this
1
ferential
I
of
and
in
where
of
bifurca-
a planar
dif-
vector
the
\037he cas\037 li\037earized coorpolar purely ImagInary eIgenvalues. USIng we capture the of such a system in the : dinates, dynamics avoid the overabundant superscripts, we will prefer to write this system in of the equilibrium terms of the ______ point dyneighborhood as the iteration of the map) difference equations scalar differential namics of an appropriate nonautonomous equation with we appeal coefficients. For the analysis of this scalar to equation, periodic .
field
:
To
we investigate the stability nonhyperbolic equilibrium point
chapter, of a
tions
has
equatio\037
to small results in Chapters 4 and 5.\037 When the vector ,) field is subjected (15.7)) (\037\037) C\\X2(:\037 Xl)) and there can be persists, perturbations, the original equilibrium point if the eigenvalues in the neighborhood. of the newcalled However, equilibria whichno is the delayed map. logistic move from the one the atequilinearized axis, expects away imaginary at and the other two fixed one has The map system points, (0, 0) (15.7) its stability is typically marked to change Jacobian - librium type. is) matrix at theThisoriginchange (1 1/ A). The 1/ A, 1 point the a small orbit the of equilibrium point. periodic encircling by appearance result-the We present a proof of this celebrated Poincare-Andronov-Hopf of the periodic orbit. We conTheorem-and a discussion of the stability (\037 \037),) biclude with an exposition of computational for determining procedures is orbits from an A. the of and has thediagrams 0 whichfurcation periodic point.))) bifurcating equilibrium Consequently, origin asymptotieigenvalues cally
if 0 < stable The Jacobian
A
fixed
other
\302\260
(1
'\\
\037),)))
1. point
(1
- 1/ A,
1
-
1/ A)
is)
334
11:
Chapter
11.1. As
tor
In the
Presence
of
Eigenvalues)
Imaginary
Purely
Stability have
we
seen in
at an
field
Example 9.9, when equilibrium point are
the
of the
eigenvalues
linearized vecdynamics
the local
imaginary,
purely
cannot be determined by the linear approxithe equilibrium can be on the nonlinear terms, unstable, stable, or even asymptotically stable. Consequently, we need to the effects of the nonlinear terms in each situation. investigate particular In this section, we show how to carry out such an investigation by reducing the dynamics in the neighborhood of a nonhyperbolic point equilibrium with purely imaginary eigenvalues to the dynamics of a 27r-periodic scalar
about
the
mation.
point
equilibrium
depending
Indeed,
differential
equation.
Let us begin by
Example 11.1. Consider
the
. Xl = .
the
briefly
recalling
X2 =
+
2
aXI ( Xl
-Xl +
of Example
9.9.
system)
planar X2
dynamics
+
2 X2
) (11.1))
2
2 ( Xl + X2 ) ,)
aX2
a is a given real number. of the value of the constant a, Regardless the origin is an equilibrium point and the eigenvalues of the linearization at the origin are :f:i. If we introduce polar coordinates (r, 0) defined by)
where
XI = then
Eq. (11.1)
r cos
X2 =
0,)
-r
sin
0,)
(11.2))
becomes)
r =
ar
o =
1.)
3)
(11.3
))
0 > 0, the orbits spiral special product system. Since around the origin. Therefore, the stability type of the point r = 0 of origin of Eq. (11.1) is the same as that of the equilibrium if the radial r = ar 3 . Of course, r = 0 is asymptotically stable equation a < 0, stable at a = 0, and unstable 11.1. 0; see Figure This
is a
rather
in 0
monotonically
the example Unlike the linearization above, planar systems for which near an equilibrium point has purely do not always imaginary eigenvalues turn out to be product systems when transformed into coordinates. polar in this we can still pursue the line of reasoning However, with some care, the to the analysis of a 27r-periodic, rather problem example and reduce f be a than autonomous, scalar let differential To be specific, equation. k given C
function,
k >
2,)
f:
IR?
---+
IR?;
x
\037
f(x),)))
11.1. Stability
Figure purely
-0.5,
11.1.
For Eq. (11.1),
imaginary
eigenvalues; a = 0.0, and
stable
for
origin
unstable
an equilibrium point with it is asymptotically stable for a =
is always
however,
for
a = 0.5.)))
335)
336
Presence
In the
11:
Chapter
satisfying) norm
the
where ber
f(O) =
that
if
prepare
all x
for
stability of equation by
the differential
(11.4
1,)
II is
IIDf(O)
< IIDf(O)llllxll IIDf(O)xll in only were interested
we
to
cient
matrix
of the Jacobian
II
0 tinuous, we can choose f?r all 0 and Irl < 8. in a neighborhood of the origin, we have 0 > o. The pleasant Consequently, in 0 of this is that the orbits of Eq. (11.6) implication spiral monotonically we can eliminate t in Eq. (11.6) and around the origin. obtain Therefore, an equation for r as a function of 0 through the differential equation) we explain
Now,
of the
sion
dr
=
dO
R(r,
(11.9))
0),)
where)
0) =
R(r,
0)
\037(r,
1+8(r,0))
C
is a
which
k
- 1
27r-periodic, and
function,
R(O,
0)
=
satisfies)
O.)
(11.10))
solutions of Eq. (11.9) give the orbits of Eq. (11.5). We can also the solutions of Eq. (11.5) as a function of time from the solutions the steps below: of Eq. (11.9) by following The
recover
. Fix
and
ro
value
is
,( xO)
Find
the solution
r(O, ro) =
(r.o, 0)
.
find
then
roo
given
O(t)
iJ =
.
The solution given
x(t)
of
the
initial xO =
point
by)
= { (x 1, X 2)
the solution
r(O, ro) of Eq. (11.9) satisfying of Eq. (11.5) through the
orbit
The
= r (0, r 0) cos 0, X2 = -r(O, ro)sinO,
: Xl
the
of
0 < O+oo}.)
initial-value
problem)
ro),
0(0)
1 +
8(r(0,
Eq.
(11.5)
0),)
through
=
the point
O.)
XO
(11.11))
(11.12))
=
(ro,
0) is
then
by)
Xl ( t) X2(t)
= r ( 0 ( t ), ro) cos 0 (t ) =
(11.13))))
-r(O(t),
ro) sinO(t).)
337)
338
Presence
In the
11:
Chapter
Eigenvalues)
Imaginary
Purely
of
Let us now illustrate, by way of an example, the role of the 27r-periodic in the stability scalar differential equation dr/dO analysis of the equilibrium of the at the point origin system (11.5).
oscillator:
A damped
11.2.
Example
or
=
Xl
X2
. X2 =
methods
the
Using
(11.14) at the
coordinates,
the
scalar
Let
2
0 sin
-l [1
=
Taylor series of the vector
introduce the
p defined
variable
= \037:
To make
the
of
coefficient
With this
l cos(40).
[1
-
have
the
abused
same
=
\"big
Eq.
(11.17),
is
given
because
of nonhyperbolicity;
make
5 to
terms
several
this purpose, (11.16)
+ 8a'(B)] p3
+
independent
new
variable,
O(p4). of
0,
we choose
(11.16),
0\"
notation
terms
may
0
is
(11.17)
a bit, in
0
in mind,
the stable;
is also
of
this
the
Poincare
no
of
is
hence,
frOID
stable.
asymptotically
we should point
the
that
sense
on 0, but
depend
asymptotically
(11.16), r =
==
a'(O)
we obtain
+ O(p4).
-lp3
p =
In the
determined.
out
the
that
map
IT
of
by
=
II(po)
Despite the asymptotic in mind that the approach
).
of O. For
from the inspection
is obtained
which
(11.15)
+ 0(r
a(O)p3,
to be
situations
complicated
conclusion
) 4
Chapter
transformation
coefficients of the higher-order that concern. Now, it is evident the form of the transformation
With more
+
p
p3 term
the
dB we
by
4
0(r
independent
cos(4B)
dp
Here,
is given
by
of
choice
(11.14)
system
3 OJr +
from field
function
-l
2
40)]r
cos(
r = where a(O) is a 27r-periodic Eq. (11.15) becomes
the
for
3
the transformation theory
us use
stable. Let us estabsection. In polar
in this
presented
(11.9)
= -[cos
dO
of the
methods
equation
dr
(11.14))))
2 XIX2.
is asymptotically
origin
the
result with
same
the
can
it
-Xl -
in Chapter 9, Liapunov functions, and the be shown rather easily that the equilibrium
presented
Principle,
point of Eq. lish
0,)
the system)
equivalently
Invariance
y =
y2iJ +
+
jj
differen-
second-order
the
Consider
tial equation)
Po
stability, to
the
-
lpg + 0(P6). it is of practical equilibrium
see Figure
11.2. )
consideration
is not exponential
to
keep
(slow!)
11.1. Stability
librium
used in procedure case of Eq. (11.5).
The
which
has
constant
a nonzero
the
example
All
that
11.3.
Lemma the
with
a < 0; In
it
otherwise
some
the
f =
+
ap2k+1
it may
situations,
in Eq.
(11.5)
p -+ 0,
a positive integer. Then the equilibrium is asymptotically stable if (11.5)
system
planar
is unstable.
as
o(lp2k+11)
k is
number,
of the
With
exercises).
2k + 2 function (/1, /2) is a C transformed scalar equation)
corresponding
a =I 0 is a real at the origin
(see
is immediate.
result
dO)
where
For Eq.
dr j dO to the equation dp j dO of the vector field expansion (11.9), it is possible to show
always be odd
must
that
Suppose
dp =
point
Taylor
be extended to the transformation theory
easily
is the
equation the
coefficient.
that this lowest order term these remarks, the following
can
above
is needed
the scalar term in
5.2 to convert the lowest order
Section
from
stable equi-
an asymptotically
with
point
general
for
For Eq. (11.14), the origin is purely imaginary eigenvalues.)
11.2.
Figure
0, then the solution r(O, ro) of Eq. (11.9) ifxo also, in O. Conversely, if the initial value r(O, ro) = ro is 21f-periodic satisfying then orbit with is a solution of the 21f-periodic Eq. (11.9), r(xO) r(O, ro) is a periodic orbit. The minimal xO = (ro, 0) of the planar system (11.5) of t for which the solution T of such a r is the first value period O(t) of
11.6.
Lemma
such
that
Eq. (11.12) satisfies) O(T)
=
21f.)
(11.18))
of the orbits of Eq. (11.5) near the The reduction of the discussion has of solutions of to the discussion important consequences Eq. (11.9) gin of for limit sets of orbits of Eq. (11.5). The result below is a special case
Poincare-Bendixson
more
fully
in
the
Theorem, next
chapter:)))
a
fundamental
result
which
orithe
we will explore
11.1. Stability 11.7. There is a bounded ifxo E U and the solution
Theorem that
such
t >
for
0 [respectively, t < 0],
a(xO)] is either a
the
or the
the origin in 1R2
(11.5) remains in
xO)
of Eq.
omega-limit
set
equilibrium
point at
cp(t,
then
orbit
periodic
U of
neighborhood
341)
U
[respectively,
w(xO) the
origin.
that U is as in Theorem 4.11. If cp(t, xO) of Eq. (11.5) Suppose in U for t > 0 (or t < 0), then the solution r(O, ro), with ro = Ilxoll, > < is bounded for 0 0 (or 0 4.11 of (11.9) that implies 0). Theorem solution of Eq. (11.9). Now, the desired r(O, ro) approaches a 21T-periodic conclusions follow from the relations (11.13). (; Proof.
remains
of the
of
notions
though
problem
of
stability, to
alluded
asymptotic it, have not
stability
yet
the
relating
planar system (11.5) to that the scalar equation (11.9).
of
solution
to the
turn
now
We
orbit
In
Chapter
of solutions on
agreed
type of a periodic corresponding 21T-periodic 4 we have defined
stability
of the
a precise
the
alnotion of stability of a with the definianalogy of
(11.9),
Eq.
but,
of a planar autonomous system. By of an equilibrium point of a planar system, it is tempting to stability orbit define a periodic as stable if any orbit starting near the periodic orbit close to the periodic orbit for all positive time. Unfortunately, this stays notion turns out to be a bit too restrictive. For the equilibrium example, at the of the is surrounded point planar pendulum origin by concentric it is natural to consider of these periodic orbits; therefore, anyone periodic orbits to be stable. orbits have different However, any two such periodic time could be at diametrically periods and thus at a fixed opposite they To overcome this dilemma, we consider a periodic orbit r of positions. as a closed curve and its time parametrization. In this Eq. neglect (11.5) we define the distance of a point x E H{,2 to a periodic orbit r, context, orbit
periodic
tion
of
denoted
by
dist
(x, r), dist
that
be
orbitally
11.9.
Definition
-
xii, for
all x
E
r}.)
if, for
Notice
chapter, that
b
implies
in the definition Poincare-Bendixson
that
of the
w(xO)
r of Eq. (11.5)is said to be orbitally stable and, in addition, there is a b > 0 that dist(cp(t, xO), r) -+ 0 as t -+ +00,
A periodic orbit is orbitally
asymptotically stable if it such that dist(xO, r) < that is, w(xO) C r. quence
- min{ Ilx
A periodic orbit r of the planar system (11.5) is said to that dist (xO, r) < 6 > 0, there is a 6 > 0 such any \342\202\254 for all t > O. The orbit r is said dist (cp(t, periodic XO), r) < \342\202\254 if it is not orbitally stable.) unstable
stable
orbitally
implies
to
r)
(x,
as)
11.8.
Definition be
to
=
r.)))
above we said theorem, to be
w(XO) presented
c r.
It is a
in the
conse-
following
342
In the
11:
Chapter
Presence
Eigenvalues)
Imaginary
Purely
of
r of Eq. (11.5) is said to be orbitally A periodic orbit if it is orbitally stable with asymptotically asymptotic phase asymptotically for any xO with dist (XO, < b and stable and, moreover, yO E r there r)
Definition
11.10.
exists a real
number
that)
lJ such
-
xO)
Ilcp(t,
these definitions, in With this section, the theorem below
Let r
11.11. Theorem the corresponding
.
as t
lJ, yO)11 \037 0
+
cp(t
\037 +00.)
conjunction with our earlier
in
observations
immediate:
is almost
of Eq. (11.5) and let 1/;(0) be 21T-periodic (11.9). Then if r is orbitally stable orbitally asymptotically stable] [respectively, of as a solution is stable asymptotically [respectively, stable] 1/;( 0) orbit
a periodic
be
of Eq.
solution
Eq. (11.9),
. r
with asymptotic phase if it is orand, bitally asymptotically any solution r(O, ro) ofEq. (11.9) v such that the solution O(t) with there is a real number ro near 1/;(0), of the initial-value problem) is
stable
asymptotically
orbitally
stable
iJ =
the
has
1 +
O(t)
property
for
ro),
8(r(0,
- t
as t
\037 lJ
=
0(0)
0),)
\037 +00.
0)
0)
Exercises)
11.1.
-, 0 there
A(\037)x+F(\037,
x)
in U. essential
part of the vector
field.
hypotheses The
of the
requirement
theorem that
the
concern vector)))
11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf field vanish at the origin is inconsequential with a change of variables around an
cover some
resulting periodic terms. This poses later
address
will
theorem
cation
of this
details
finer
the
of
must
one
orbit, nontrivial
always
such
the
investigate
as the
where A is a scalar that the origin is
Xl
==
several
X2
==
an
2
r
isolated
==
xI
)XI
(11.20))
F satisfies F( 0, 0) == In polar coordinates,
==
F(A,
r
2
)r
types
and
of
2
a ) r 0 or F(A, 0, then Eq. (11.20) with \"amplitude\" The bifurcation diagram ==
==
of periodic equilibrium
corresponding
differential
scalar
the
properties
stability
same as the
0 so
this
(11.21))
0==1.)
The existence
form)
system)
product
r
are the
periodic
of the
r 2 )X2')
point.
equilibrium
7
Chapter of
2
x\037, and
+
from
system
planar
+ F(A,
-Xl
exhibiting
examples
specific
special
F( A, r
X2 +
parameter,
the
becomes
system
the rather
nonlinear
the
some of which we challenges on a proof of the bifurembarking
computational
Consider
11.13.
To un-
stability of the
of
effects
bifurcations of periodic orbits from an equilibrium. let us reconsider a familiar As our first example, system for bifurcation diagrams and illustrate some of the possibilities orbits near an equilibrium point.) Example
satisfied
be
point.
equilibrium
arbitrary
bifurcation,
in this chapter. Before above, let us examine
it can
since
345)
Bifurcation
solutions of
points
Eq.
(11.20)
their stability if either Indeed,
and
2 equation r == F( A, r )r. is a 21T-periodic -asint) (acost,
solution
of
a.
solutions of Eq. (11.20) is simply periodic a 2 ) == 0 in the (A, a)-plane together with the A-axis. As usual, stable periodic orbits are indicated by solid curves and curves. unstable ones with dashed Let us now take several forms for F and draw the specific correspondbifurcation diagrams. ing . For F( A, r) == A: we obtain a linear perturbation of the linear harorbit monic oscillator. There is no nontrivial periodic except at A == 0, a. All peorbit for each amplitude at which case there is one periodic riodic orbits are orbitally stable. See Figure 11.3a for the bifurcation
a plot
of
the
for
of F(A,
solutions
diagram.
.
- r 2 : there
is a unique nontrivial periodic if orbit of a; namely, a == JX. The periodic orbit 11.3b for the bifurcation))) is orbitally asymptotically stable. See Figure For F( A, A > 0 for
r)
==
A
a particular
value
346
Presence of Purely Imaginary
In the
11:
Chapter
diagram.
Because
the right,
the
. For
==
r)
F(>\",
is called
-
2
-(r
are two
nontrivial
orbitally
asymptotically 2 + c )1/2] 1/2.
[c::t
(>..
>.. decreases
2 c)2 + c
supercritical. >.. with c > 0
+
one
orbits,
periodic
through
curve emanates
bifurcation
the
bifurcation
-c 2 . There is
bifurcation
Because
diagram.
the
bifurcation
the
left,
..
only one See
.. > 0 and 11.3c for the complete
coalesce
orbits
periodic
it is orbitally asymptotically stable. origin to
2
a
the
from
unstable
orbitally
for -c
stable,
The two
Eigenvalues)
periodic
Figure
the bifurcation curve emanates is called subcritical.
the
from
In
each of these the hypotheses of the Poincare-Andronovexamples bifurcation theorem are satisfied. The existence of a periodic orbit Hopf with small amplitude for small >.. as asserted by the theorem is evident; orbit depends on the nonlinear the stability type of the periodic however, terms of the vector field. Moreover, as seen in the first and last cases, there with large amplitudes, for a can also be additional periodic orbits, possibly in Figure 11.3 a glance at the bifurcation given small 1>\"1. Indeed, diagrams of the general situation should be a diagram suggests that the bifurcation distortion of that of the linear harmonic oscillator but the diagram is still a graph over the a-axis. (;
second
Our
This
famous
is realistic
and it points
Example
11.14.
order
differential
orbit
periodic
More
bifurcation.
the way
Van der
>.. ==
0,
ple 11.2.
thus
the
For>..
origin
It is clear the
to the
-
(2)''
Consider
oscillator:
small
on a
-
y2)y +
y
==
scalar
the
following
second>..:)
parameter
0,)
system)
planar
Xl
==
X2
X2
==
-Xl
+
2>\"X2
-
( 11.22))
XI X2.)
the lineariz ation of Eq. (11.22) about the equilibare>.. ::t i y' l - >..2. For>.. < 0, the origin is asympthe real parts of the eigenvalues are negative. At in stable as we have shown Examasymptotically the real parts of the eigenvalues become positive and
point
totically
Pol's
case.
eigenvalues of at the origin stable because the origin is still
The rium
however, the method of computations analysis of the general
a successful
to
depending
equation
is equivalent
a variant of the oscillator of Van der Pol. essential characteristics of the typical a Poincare--Andronovappears through
importantly,
jj
which
the
exhibits
in which a
manner Hopf
concerns
example equation
> 0, is unstable.
that
the
Poincare-Andronov-Hopf
planar
system
bifurcation
satisfies the theorem and thus
(11.22)
of
hypotheses it
must
have
a)))
11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf
347)
Bifurcation
a
@) \\
0)
\037
--------
A)
( a))
a)
;))
---------A)
( b))
a)
.. ....... ... ...... ..' ..,... ... ....... ...... .....
I())
J) '(,\037,)
______
---..:::J7\"'\"
A)
(c))
11.3.
Figure
tions F: supercritical;
(a)
funcBifurcation diagrams of Eq. (11.20) for three different 2 2 - r 2 is F(A, r ) == A is degenerate; (b) for F(A, r ) == A and (c) for F(A, r 2 ) == _(r 2 - C)2 + c 2 + A is subcritical.) for
periodic orbit near
the
11.4. To gain insight into detailed
computations
origin
the
for
some
dynamics
which are also
small values of of Eq. (11.22), indicative
Using polar coordinates and the transformation previous section, we will show below that,
of
the
theory
as the
A,
as
let us
seen
general presented
eigenvalues
in Figure some
perform
situation. in the cross
the)))
348
Presence
In the
11:
Chapter
=
For further
-
[r(t)
on
information
h(t)] x
-
[1
. r(t)-h\037t)
k(t)) ]
r(t)
see Sanchez [1982].)
harvesting,
periodic
Eigenvalues)
Imaginary
Purely
of
A = -0.1)
4.5. We
Stability
in
remarked
have
Eq. (4.4)
Solutions Section 4.2 that a I-periodic
of Periodic
11. Furthermore, fixed point Xo.
a fixed
to
corresponds
point
the stability properties The Poincare map is
also monotone nondecreasing; it follows from Theorem
of
cp
solution cp(t, 0, = Xo, of the Poincare are the same as those
differentiable
II' (xo)
thus,
3.8 that
II(xo)
Xo,
cp is
for
asymptotically to use that
map of
the
and Appendix) all Xo. Consequently, stable if II' (:fo) < 1, the
(see
> 0
xo) of
this result one would to which is a difficult map object A = 0.0) the solution of is available. To circumvent unless Eq. (4.4) compute general in this section we derive for the derivative a formula of the this difficulty, in of solution terms the and the vector Poincare only I-periodic map cp In doing so, we will also discover some other properties of field f (t, x). which are of independent differential interest. equations and
need
x)
If
4.20.
Lemma f(t,
It may
> 1. ifII'(xo) formula for an explicit
unstable
with
cp(O,
0, xo) =
initial-value
following
0,
cp(t,
0, xo))
cp(t,
(t,
differential
a linear
for
z,) = A 0.1)
equation:) =
z(O)
(4.15
1,)
))
is,)
8cp
axo Proof.
then
Xo,
\037\037
that
solution of a i-periodic equation x = is the solution of the 8cp(t, 0, xo)/8xo
is the
xo)
problem
i =
appear
Poincare
the
The
solution
(t, 0, xo) = cp( t,
0, xo)
cp(t, 0, xo)
both sides
Differentiating
chain rule,
8 Xo
Xo
[ 10
ax
is given +
this
xo))ds ] .
( 4.16))
by)
I(s,
it
(s, cp(s, 0,
equation
cp(s,
0,
ds.)
xo))
with respect
to
A = 0.3
Xo,
and
using
the
yields)
Figure
_8cp
of
=
{t 8 f
exp
11.4.
Poincare-Andronov-Hopf t
(t, 0, xo) = 1 +
_8f
i
0
8x
in
bifurcation
_
8cp
(s,
cp(s,
0, xo))
8Xo))) (s,
0,
Van der
xo) ds.
Pol.)))
11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf axis, the origin gives specifically, we will demonstrate imaginary
nontrivial
r
orbit
periodic
its
up
that, the
A near
which
origin
Let
is
orbit.
periodic
asymptotically
orbitally
there
Then
XiX2.
More
0, there is a unique
A >
small
each
Moreover, r A ---+ 0 as A ---+ O. F1(A, x) = 0 and F 2 (A, x) = 2AX2
stable.
to a
stability
for
349)
Bifurcation
is a
AO
>
0
such that)
IIDF(A, 0) II the conditions (11.4) for satisfied as long as I A I
thus
and
dr / dO
are
Pol, Eq.
(11.9) is given
to a
reduction
function, F
: JR
the normalization
x
---+
JR2
=
X2
DxF(,x,
0,)
=
,xXI +
=
-Xl
approximate
amplitude
X2
+
For this normalized system, be reformulated in the following as the
(,x, x)
JR2;
the system of differential Xl
have
above
processes
setting.
following
Let
been F be a
3,)
F(,x, 0) consider
to the
attention
satisfying)
and
\037).)
of
,xX2
+
\037
0)
x),)
F(,x,
=
29 ))
equations) FI(,x, +
Xl, X2)
F 2 (,x, Xl,
(11.30)) X2).)
the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf way,
( 11.
0,)
where
a periodic
the variable
theorem
a should
be
can viewed
solution:
11.15. For the system there are constants ao > 0, (11.30), 1 real-valued 0 functions of aofreal 00 ) by the unit circle an w-limit on is 0, and point ,x*(a), T*(a) (ro,variable (1, 0) and a T*(a)-periodic vector-valued function with = the a, in be Definition 7.10 to the following + x*(t, a) sequence simply taking 0) 21rj. (0 0 tj tj a < ao,))) set of any initial value for the 0 < w-limit properties: with ro -=I 0 is the unit))) Consequently, Theorem ,xo
>
> 0, 8 0point
352
Presence
In the
11:
Chapter
of
Eigenvalues)
Imaginary
Purely
*
*
. A ( 0) == 0, T* ( 0) == 211\", II x (0, a) II == a. . The function x*(t, a) is a solution of the system (11.30) with value A == A * (a) and its components are given rameter by) x \037( t, a)
a)
x;(t, For
.
Proof.
0,
In this
proof of the
and
proof we
previous
will
continue
theorem.
For
to use the notation developed fixed a, let \037= ,\\*(0,). Using the
in
the
solution)
0 r(X,
9, a)
=
e'\037oa +
1
eX(O-s) P(X,
r(X,
s,
a),
s)
ds)
(11.35))))
354
In the
11:
Chapter
Presence
Eigenvalues)
Imaginary
Purely
of
a)
a)
\\ \\
,
\ A)
A)
Subcritical)
Supercritical)
Figure
11.6.
ra agram: if d'\\*(a)jda
scalar
of the
the
Two
Poincare
is
amplitude a
from the
a
di-
bifurcation
> 0, and
if d'\\*(a)jda
stable
type of
Stability
'\\*(a).
inferred
unstable
O.)
differential IT of
map
to
it is convenient
equation (11.31), we Eq. (11.31) at a == a. the
consider
e
type
stability
q(a).
the
of
27rX
[IT' (a)
periodic
determine
now
will
We
will
compute
For
-
1]
the derivative
computational
defined
q(a)
quantity
q(a)
the so that the sign of
function
be
can
asymptotically
orbitally
; +
- e- 27rA
,X ==
*
(a))
a +
from Eq.
'x*(a), {27r
(X, r(X,
e-
A
*
(11.34) *
(a)s
P(.x
Jo
s, a), s) (X, \037:
ds.
(11.36)
have)
we
(a), r(.x
s, a)
*
(a), s, a), s) ds =
O.
(11.37)
To
make
the notation
venient to
rewrite
this
equation
- e(1
in
manageable
subsequent
computations,
it is
con-
as)
27rA
*(a))
a +
ag(.x*(a), a)
=
0)
(11.38))))
11.2. Poincare-Andronov-Hopf or)
- e-
1
27r A
*
(a)
*
+ 9 ()..
( a ),
== o.)
a)
355)
Bifurcation
(11.39))
The existence of such a function 9 follows from Eq. (11.32). Now, differento a and then putting a == a yields) tiating Eq. (11.38)with respect
(
1-
e-
27rX
+ a\037 )
-
d +
da
(ag().., a))
and the
the first
Combining
junction with
in conjunction with
I
-
As
a result,
Poincare
II' (ii) differentiate
-(A
for
Thus,
+
ii, we
with
of the
(11.40
ii).)
to
respect
=
(X,
::..*
[27re-
small
sufficiently
(X,
8a
27fX
terms
- 8 g
Eq. (11.39)
*)' (ii)
fourth
derivative
the
for
iie- 27f A
1 =
-
the
and
O.)
formula
following
above in con-
equation
second
=
ii)
(X,
\037\037
the
we obtain
== o.) I a=a
at)
map:)
Finally,
in the
the
arrive
ii
ii))
(ag()..*(a),
\"terms\"
Eq. (11.39), we
_ I a=a)
)
da
third
q(ii)
(a)
d
+
a=a
*
27rA
and combining
(11.36),
Eq.
(
da
1 _ e-
a and
== a:)
ii).)
(X,
\037\037
ii)]
put a
))
have)
=
sign [-(A*)'(ii)]
(X,
sign
\037\037
(11.41))
ii).)
c(s)ds
==
O.
and c are given In fact, the solutions of /3 fJo + f; c(s)ds bythe(3(t) desired conclusion) Now, from the relations (11.40) and (11.41), t+ 1 == == == if if if 0 and + 1) However, only c(s)ds (3(t (3(t) ft f01 c(s)ds. , * we chose + == sign(constant) fJ(t) == [II' ( a) 1] [c(s) [- ( )..co] ) ds,( a) ])that is, (3(t) satisfies the f; sign ==
==
differential
is self-evident.
equation)
0
/3
== c
-
( t)
(5.9))
co,)
As this somewhat should reexamine equathe differential choose then a reward proof,satisfying you So, we intricate {3 I-periodic. (3(t) is of in this In the earlier bifurcation == chapter. particular, you should also require that O. tion (5.9). We maydiagrams f01 {3(s)ds differentiate the bifurcation curve the of oscillator of Van der Pol.)the cochosen as above. To simplify now that {3 has (11.27) been Suppose efficient
of the
Exercises)
satisfying
fo1
w
,( s)
11.12. Rayleigh's equation: >.. is a small scalar
3
in Eq.
term
ds
==
The
0,
from
(5.8),
second-order
parameter,
we
can
the differential
1
determine
equation)
the function
,
(t
),
leC/'O)
equation jj + y3 - 2>\"y + y = 0, where - theory of sound and is known))) /1,) (5.10))))
m(t) the
arises == in
356
as
Convert this into a
equation.
Rayleigh's
gate the
Poincare-Andronov-Hopf
stability
type
Answer: The 11.13.
Presence of Purely Imaginary
In the
11:
Chapter
Discuss the
the
of
of the
orbits
\\ = AXI
.
X2 =
11.14.
origin for
the
is
curve
bifurcation
.
O.
investi-
and
system
A =
about
the
Determine
orbit.
approximate
Xl
near
first-order
bifurcation
periodic
periodic
Eigenvalues)
2
A =
a /8 + O(a
3
).
system)
+
X2
+ XlX2
- Xl2
\\ AX2
-Xl +
2
+ aXlX2 2 X2)
+
small.
IAI
Discuss the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf of the system)
near
bifurcation
the
origin for
A near
zero
Xl
this
In
11.15.
example,
=
Xl +
X2 =
(A
you
should
Normal
Form.)
Center
in Hamiltonian
-
X2
2)Xl + first
-
(A
1)x2
x\037
-
X\037X2.)
the linear part
put
A =
for
0 in Jordan
function
a Hamiltonian
Consider
systems:
-
of
the
form)
H(Xl, as
IX 21
lXII,
\037 0,
=
X2)
and
\037
(x\037
+ x\037) + 0
((Ixli +
IX21)2)
the Hamiltonian system)
{3 1= O. Then,
8H
.
Xl=-
8X2
.
X2 =
-- 8H 8Xl)
at the origin.
a center
has
Hopf
Consider
point
at
If by
Co
=
is easy
This
to
show
of a center
existence
using from
the method the
Poincare-
of Liapunov Andronov-
theorem.
bifurcation
Hint:
the one-parameter
Xo; hence, the
Eq. (4.4), is (ii)
the
Establish
functions.
unstable
0, then
Xl
= A
X2
derivative
8H
in Eq. (5.6). Thus, the 8H
as
+
8X2 periodic
8Xl
corresponding
if Co =1= O. =
the third
system)
solution
8H _ at the fixed 8X2of Il 8Xl)
fixed
cp(t, 0, xo) of
8H
A
point
Xo
is given
N ow1 verify that this system a neighborhood of zero. satisfies the = II/\" (xo) theorem dt of the bifurcation and there 6d o, are no periodic orbits d(t) that 61 for A = O. For further on this approach, see Schmidt information except and his in Marsden and McCracken in as the where is fixed at the exposition [1978] d(t) Thus, Eq. (5.6). point[1976].))) Xo, hence, of is if solution unstable 0, xo) periodic Eq. (4.4), corresponding cp(t, for
A in
hypotheses
do
> 0
and asymptotically stable if
do
4, satisfying Moreover, assume
the transformation the
equation
form)
C +
[ ,8(0)
theory outlined
differential
scalar
corresponding
p-
.\\)
(11.47))
x),)
F(.\\,
sufficiently
has
2
(
Ok
using
coefficients
+ 0
equation:)
x+
a(.\\) )
-(3(,X))
parameter,
constant
differential
planar
following
p
0(.\\)
]
3
+ O(p
4 ),)
(11.48))
the form of the a'(O) = (dajd'x)(O) and c is some constant. From Poincare map of Eq. (11.48) and Theorem 11.16, the following result on the a is the approximate bifurcation curve 'x(a), where amplitude, ofEq. (11.47)
where
should
be evident:)))
11.3. Computing a)
359)
Curves
Bifurcation
a)
-
.....
\"
\
-------
-------
A)
> 0
(X' (0)
(x'
(0) >
c>O)
A)
0
c 0 and 8 > 0 such that for o < IAI < Ao, and xO E L8, there is a first time T(A, xO) > 0 such that the)))
satisfying solutions
F(O, x)
of Eq.
12.3. Local solution cp(A,
xO) of Eq. (12.17) the Poincare map
t,
define
fore,
we
cp(A,
T(A,
xO),
satisfies
xO), xO) E Le. Thereas II(A, xO) = parameters
T(A,
cp(A, on
depending
Orbits
of Periodic
Bifurcations
into Le. The Poincare map II(A, xO) will that II(O, XO) was in Theorem 12.13. Of near ro correspond to fixed points of II(A, xO). in Section results 3.3 on fixed of monotone points to the Poincare map II(A, For if ro is example, xO). each A with there is a unique periodic orbit IAI small,
xO) mapping L8 for the same reason
be monotone orbits course, periodic Now, the general maps can be applied hyperbolic, then for
r 0 and r A is also hyperbolic. When ro is nonhyperbolic, the bifurcations near the periodic orbit ro are determined from the bifurcations of the Poincare map II(A, xO). The bifurcation of the nonhyperexample below corresponds to a saddle-node bolic fixed of the Poincare map at, for instance, xO = (1, 0). point r
A near
Example 12.20. the planar system Xl = X2
==
A
is a
-
-
X2 cos X2
sin
A +
A +
of periodic
-
COS A
-
(1
(1
x\037
x\037
-
x\037)2(Xl
sin
x\037)2(Xl
r
== r
iJ =
[ (1
- r 2 ) 2 cos
- r (1
2
2
)
-
A
an
r sin
sin
sin A + cos
X2
sin
X2 COS
A)
A),)
is the
system
field of
form)
-
Consider
orbits:
(12.18)) A +
real small
vector
the
of
the
has
Xl COS A
A
bifurcation
parameter. This one-parameter Example 12.16 through In polar coordinates Xl == r cos 0 and X2 =
where
tion
-Xl sin
saddle-node
A
A
rota-
angle
A.
0, the
system (12.18)
] (12.19))
A.
the first equation is independent of 0, it is easy to see that, Since in the radial direction, the system above a saddle-node bifurcation as undergoes the parameter A passes zero. Indeed, if A > 0, and is sufficiently through then the system close to zero, an unstable orbits; (12.19) has two periodic
periodic
orbit) X\037+
which
is a
circle of
=
x\037
=
x\037
which is a circle of radius less than of course, is Example 12.9 which orbits as
t
orbit
at
x\037 +x\037
= 1. If
and all the -+ +00; see Figure 12.7. because
v tanA,
radius greater than 1, and x\037 +
periodic
1 +
r > 0
A
.o)
two limit A quadmtic system with a on parameter depending system
12.10.
= P(Xl, = X2 P(Xl, Xl
where
P( Xl, X2)
and Q( Xl,
=
X2)
Q(Xl,
A
-
cos
X2)
sin A +
are
Q(Xl,
X2)
sin
quadratic
planar
A
Q(Xl, X2) COS
given
A,)
by)
169(Xl - 1)2 - 1)2 144(Xl
X2) =
P(Xl,
cycles: A:)
X2)
X2)
Consider the
-
16(X2
-
9(X2
1)2
1)2
- 153, 135.)
the vector field. For A = 0.8, there is a that the parameter A rotates limit cycle surrounding the equilibrium point (0, 0), and an unstable limit around the point cycles equilibrium cycle (2, 2). Locate these limit the unstable run the solutions one, you should using a computer. To find size. This system is contained in the library backward with a negative step under the name hilbert2.) of PHASER Notice
stable
In the search orbits
periodic
for
it is
orbits,
periodic
important to understand
how
periodic
famous In the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf bifurcation. we will illustrate how a brief section, which consists of one example, can bifurcate from or be absorbed by a homo clinic loop. orbit can be created or
instance this
Bifurcation)
A Homoclinic
12.4.
this
of
is, of course,
12.21.
Example
The most
bifurcations.
through
destroyed
orbit
Periodic
a homoclinic
from
loop:
the
Consider
system)
planar
= 2X2 . X2 = 2 Xl Xl
- 3Xl 2
3 X2 ( Xl
-
-
2 Xl
+
2 X2
( 12.20)) C ) ,)
that when c = 0, these reequations 12.4 with A = -1: there is a homoclinic the origin and attracts from as seen in Figure 12.8b. within, loop through We now the phase portrait of this system for small nonzero analyze For all values of c, there are two values of the c near zero. parameter a saddle, and the other at points; the one at (0, 0) is always equilibrium c is
where
duce to
0)
(2/3,
To
consider
a
scalar
parameter.
the special
case
is unstable analyze
the
the
Notice
of Example
(source) when c > of the phase
details
-4/27. portraits
of Eq.
function)
V(Xl,
X2)
=
xr
-
xI +
x\037)))
(12.20) further,
we
385)
386
Chapter
12:
Periodic
Orbits)
c =
-0.
1)
c=O)
c = 0.1) Figure
Wben loop; nearby.)))
12.8. A bomoclinic bifurcation in Example 12.21 near c == O. c < 0, tbere is a periodic orbit; at c == 0, it becomes tbe bomoclinic is broken and tbere is no periodic for c > 0, tbe bomoclinic orbit loop
12.4. A and compute its
derivative
X2)
V(XI,
For
the
==
x\037
loop
no periodic
in
illustrated
12.8.
Figure
X2
the
0,
-
(12.20) to
periodic
This
obtain)
c).)
For c > 0, the
orbit.
387)
Bifurcation
one can see that there lying on the curve x\037
orbit
periodic
Xl > o. As c ---+ the origin. through
and also there is
+
Principle,
with
0,
homoclinic
broken
lnvariance
stable
asymptotically
orbitally - c
xI +
322 - 2X 2(XI Xl
==
< 0, using the
< c
-4/27
is an
of Eq.
solutions
the
along
.
Homoclinic
orbit approaches homoclinic
loop
is
of bifurcations is
sequence
of a (unique) loop is broken, the birth periodic under fairly general assumptions; however, we refrain here from such a formulation. Homoclinic loops play a significant in Chapter role in bifurcation 13 theory and we will encounter them again when we consider planar flows at large.)
a homoclinic
When
orbit
be
can
established
Exercises)
\"y>.)
12.11. Show
in Example
that
12.21 the
orbit
periodic
and 12.12.
the
Consider
planar
is
at the
from
decreased
at
(2/3, 0) value
parameter
0 towards
undergoes
c =
-4/27.
-4/27, the
the homo clinic loop gradually becomes smaller the equilibrium point at (2/3, 0).
off
springing
disappears
finally
parameter c
as the
that
Observe
point
equilibrium
bifurcation
a Poincare-Andronov-Hopf
into
system) Xl
=
X2 =
X2 Xl
-
x\037 +
AX2 +
aXlX2.)
of a at a positive the origin is a saddle point. Fix the value on PHASER to convince that there is a experiment yourself negative value of A at which the system has a homo clinic loop. Now, change the homo clinic loop, and search for the unique periodic A a little to break in the proximity of the original orbit homoclinic loop.)
that
Observe
value.
Then
Bibliographical The
details
Notes)
of the central result
@\\0) of
Poincare
and
Bendixson
can be found
in many sources; for example, Hale [1980], Hartman [1964], and Hirsch see, of the Jordan and Smale [1974]. A proof Curve Theorem is in Newman theory for two[1953]. A generalization of the Poincare-Bendixson in Schwartz dimensional surfaces other than the plane are given [1963]. A comprehensive reference on the search for limit cycles, Dulac funcis Yeh of the existence of a on the The etc., tions, plane proof [1986]. of Van der Pol is from Ye [1986] and that of its limit cycle of the oscillator is from Coppel [1965].))) hyperbolicity
388
Chapter
12:
Periodic
The sixteenth
Orbits) problem
of the few unanswered in the collection by absent
one
has a
of Hilbert
questions
of
his
fascinating history and
list.
Curiously,
remains
number sixteen
is
Browder [1976] on the progress of Hilbert's probresult on the sixteenth problem was the \"theorem\" lems. The first major of the total number of limit cycles of Dulac [1923] asserting the finiteness a gap in his \"proof\" of a general vector field. planar Later, polynomial the theorem it turned out to be nonrectifiable. was discovered; Recently, for with of Dulac has been proved by Bamon quadratic polynomials, [1987] For general major contributions by II'yaschenko. polynomials, there are of Dulac's theorem in Ecalle et al. [1987] and II'yaschenko announcements A bound for the number of limit cycles, however, still appears to [1990]. been false be even for quadratic have distant, polynomials, although there is that there can be at most four proofs and claims. The general feeling and there is such an example limit cycles in the case of quadratics, by Wang and also by Shi [1980] stored in the library of PHASER under the name For and on vector consult Chicone fields, hilbert4. easy reading quadratic Tian [1982]. the bifurcations of a homoclinic One important loop question regarding is the number of resulting periodic orbits. Under fairly general assumptions, the that the trace of the linearization at the most notably requirement of the from zero, one can establish the uniqueness saddle point be different it is possible periodic orbit. If the trace condition is not met, bifurcating to obtain any number of periodic orbits. Bifurcation of periodic orbits of in great detail in Andronov et al. [1973],including planar systems is covered of homoclinic loops. Do not miss especially the last results on bifurcations are presented. Some chapter of this book, where many specific examples in higher dimensions are of these topics and the role of planar bifurcations in Chow and Hale contained [1982].)))
13)
All
Planar
Things
Considered)
In
the
numerous
encountered
chapters
that have
come
before,
we have
for many bifurcations, and equilibria periodic orbits, Poincare-Andronov-Hopf, and breaking homo clinic and saddle connections. It loops is natural to ponder if ever, we will stop adding when, to the list and produce a complete catalog of all possible In this chapter, we indeed bifurcations. such a list for \"generic\" provide bifurcations of planar vector fields on one parameter. However, depending due to the overwhelming difficulty of the subject matter, our exposition, To circumvent certain technical while precise, is devoid of verifications. we confine our attention to a closed and bounded complications, region of and in such a region characterize the plane, the stable vecstructurally tor fields. To motivate this confinement, we then make a short digression to describe a class of vector fields whose dynamics are naturally confined to a bounded region-dissipative systems. we explore the geomeNext, try of sets of mildly structurally unstable vector fields-first-order structural the sets of such vector fields forming instability. By determining all in the set of vector arrive at a list of onewe fields, hypersurfaces bifurcations. You will that some notice parameter \"generic\" undoubtedly of the familiar bifurcations are absent from the list. We provide an explanation for this as well, in terms of symmetries. We end the chapter with a glimpse into fields.))) the intricate bifurcations of two- parameter vector such
as
saddle-node
390
13.1. On
All Planar
13:
Chapter
Things
occasions
previous
many
small
under
preserved
cast, in the spirit of tive dynamics in a general of those planar vector fields
field.
fields we
Here,
2.6, this important topic of qualitaand give a complete characterization setting, for which the orbit structure remains quali-
small
under
unchanged
of vector
properties
of the vector
perturbations
Section
finally
tatively
Vector Fields we have considered
Stable
Structurally
that are
Considered)
stable vector
perturbations-structurally
fields.
Our first-order task is to introduce a suitable distance on the space of planar vector fields so as to make the notion of \"small perturbation\" of the unboundedness of the plane, this of a vector field Because precise. turns out to be more difficult than it first appears. To circumvent this and of vector other difficulties, we will restrict our comparison fields to some and bounded-subset of the plane. compact--closed Let V be a compact a smooth subset of ]R2 with boundary and let k fields defined on V and pointing inwards at Xk(V) denote the C vector the boundary a neighborhood of a vector field in points of V. To specify one fixes a norm on ]R2 and defines the CO distance of two vector Xk(V), fields f and g in Xk(V) to be)
-
Ilf
However, instance,
the
distance
CO
two vector
=
gilD
sup { xEV)
of hyperbolic equilibria; see Figure we introduce the C 1 distance derivatives to be close at all
In
this
norm on the
set
gill =
-
]R4.
With
of all vector
The
resulting We also
ness
conditions
sup xEV)
fields
topology will have
g
-
gllr =
use
details.)))
the C r
For
large.'
number
same
situa-
undesirable
the functions as
well
g(x)ll,
as
linear the
define
employ
-
IIDf(x)
Dg(x)11
functions and use any 6 neighborhood of f to be < 6.
k > 1, satisfying the C 1 topology.
Ilf
distances
by imposing
cr
gilt
close-
{ IIDif(x)
-
Dig(x)11
},
O\037i\037r)
set
as
}.
derivatives,)
sup
topology on the
'too the
of V:)
in Xk(V), with is called (V)
occasion to
that are
requiring
on X k
xEV;
and
-
{ Ilf(x)
on higher-order IIf
by points
}.
not have To avoid this
13.1.
we view the derivatives the C 1 distance, we
definition,
g(x)11
yields neighborhoods are CO close may
that
fields
tion, their
Ilf
-
Ilf(x)
of vector
fields Xk(V);
we omit further
13.1. Structurally
Figure 13.1. not
Cl
in the
Two
Fields
Vector
that are close in the CO topology different number of zeros.)
functions
(scalar) may
topology
Stable
have
but
To our notation, in this chapter Xk(V) will summarize denote the k k > 1, defined on a compact subset V of the space of C vector fields, and pointing inwards at the boundary of V. The topology on plane points will at be least the C 1 topology. the infinite dimensional space Xk(V) These technical conventions we now return to dynamics.) attended, Definition
equivalent orbits of
13.1. Two vector fields f and g are said to be if there is a homeomorphism h : V --+ V such that
f onto
the orbits
x topologically
\037
= equivalent f(x)
to f.)-(3
f
Nf
E off Xl
h
maps
the sense of direction of have the following form with k > 1, is structurally Xk(V), in Xk(V) such that any g E 91 (Xl, X2)
of g and preserves f to assume may
the origin:) 13.2. A vector field Definition if there is a neighborhood stable
topologically
.
+
the
time.) near
N f
is
(15.24))
) ( x2 ) ( 92 ( Xl, X2)) ) is admittedly a bit amalgamated; we consider two vecThis definition in polar coefficient a of the cubic term in Eq. (15.23) Then tor fieldsthe tomagic be \"near\" if their values as well as their derivatives are close, is equal to) coordinates while to compare their phase portraits up to only topological settling equivto As we pointed out in Section alence without reference differentiability. 2J-L)p2 (1 2 2 1 a=Re and not is the (15.25)) natudifferentiable '1160 +1'021 -Re(il61),) 8.3, topological equivalence equivalence +\"21'111 I-J1[ ] It is a fact remarkable ral concept even when linear systems. comparing in a complete characthat these perplexing choices of comparisons result where) of the structurally terization stable vector fields in a bounded region of the us recall+ 2(g2)XIX2 we the result,- let several definitions from the Before 60 state (gl)x2x2 plane. =\037 a
(;)
{(gl)XIXl
past.)
+ i
[(g2)XIXl
-
(g2)X2X2
-
2(gl
)XIX2]
},
point x of a vector field f is called hy61 with nonzero if the linear real has eigenvalues vector (gdxlxl field + Df(x) (gdx2x2 perbolic =\037{ negative parts. In the case when one eigenvalue is positive and the other + (g2)X2 X 2] + i [(g2)XIXl called a saddle the equilibrium point.))) point x is },))) Definition
13.3.
An equilibrium
391)
392
All Planar
13:
Chapter
tive of the
Poincare
sets
orbit
if its limit
the
An orbit is called a
are saddle
limit
these
With
points.
dynamical structural
on
a compact region V 13.6.
Theorem
with
k
>
of
deriva-
the
saddle
distinct
Q- and wa heteroclinic and homoclinic if if its
connection
saddle
is called points,
point.)
concepts at our disposal, for planar vector stability
the
now state
can
we
fields
pointing
into
plane.
k A C vector field f E (Structurally stable vector fields) V stable on if and only if f has the 1, is structurally
properties:
following
(i) all equilibrium points are hyperbolic; (ii) all periodic orbits are hyperbolic; there are no saddle connections. (iii) The
from our ciency,
if the
hyperbolic
connection
saddle
A
Q- and w-limit sets are sets are the same saddle
main theorem
Xk(V),
orbit ,(xO) is called IT' (xO) =1= 1.
satisfies
map
13.5.
Definition
Considered)
A periodic
13.4.
Definition
Things
necessity
of these
previous
examples
however,
is
conditions
0 for
structural
are self-evident
stability
study of local bifurcations. establish and thus we say
in the to
difficult
The
no
more
suffiabout
it.)
Despite
the mathematical
general, easy to stable.
if
determine
For example, it is
compact region, and here is one ertheless,
periodic success
of
elegance
a specific
difficult
orbits story
to
the
theorem
above, it is not, in
planar vector field if a vector field verify
are based
is
structurally into
points
nearly impossible to on our earlier work.)
locate.
a
Nev-
13.7. Van der Pol is structurally stable: In the previous Example chapter, while proving the existence of a periodic orbit of the equation of Van der Pol, we constructed a compact set, say, V, into which all orbits eventually entered. The boundary of this set had a couple of corners, but it is possible to modify the set a bit to smooth out the while ensuring that boundary the flow still points inward at the boundary. this set there is an Inside orbit both of which we showed to be equilibrium point and a periodic there is no saddle connection the w-limit because Moreover, hyperbolic. set of any orbit except the origin is the periodic orbit. Now that we have all of the theorem above, verified that the the hypotheses we conclude of Van der Pol is stable within the class equation structurally Xk(V), the set of C k vector fields pointing inward into V and endowed with the C k topology.
0)
Despite the ation is less of a
to
be
structurally
difficulties concern
stable.)))
posed as
\"most\"
by specific
planar
vector fields, vector fields
the in
X
k
general
situ-
(V) turn out
13.1. Structurally Theorem
13.8.
consisting
of
Xk(V), that
structural
stability)
stable vector fields is structurally structural is a stability generic property.
is,
of this
In light nore
of
(Genericity
the
theorem, it
perturbation
will
to be
appears
usually
(;
convenient to
an
because
393)
The subset of Xk(V) and dense in open
practically
planar vector fields a structurally turn
unstable
structurally
Fields
Vector
Stable
unstable vector
ig-
small
arbitrarily
a
into
field
for a single planar stable one. This is a reasonable structurally strategy if the field on a vector vector field; depends parameter, however, the difas shall we see later in this into ficulties abound, chapter. Before delving of bifurcations, we now make a short diversion and explore the depths the condition we have elected to on our vector fields.) impose boundary Exercises)
,.\037.(;)
13.1. A structurally
stable
that
Show
system:
= 2Xl
Xl .
X2 = -X2
+
- Xl (xi
X2
-
the planar
2
X2
( Xl +
+
system)
x\037)
2 X2) )
all the hypotheses stable by verifying of Theorem 13.6. field is symmetric with respect to the reflection through and There are no periodic disk. inward on a large points enough origin, orbits because there is an invariant line through the origin. Further help is available in Andronov et al. [1973], p. 190. Also, you might like to plot the is structurally
phase 13.2.
of this
portrait
Determine disk
13.3.
vector
The
Hints:
the
13.4. Sketch a flow yet there are Suggestion:
consists
13.5. Structural may have Suggestion: previous
on
of the vector field in the previous Can you compute its C l norm?
a bounded
You exercise
domain such that of hyperbolic orbits
periodic points
and
and
finiteness:
does
proves
up
a
the
set
topology'
in,
on
topology
\"Whitney
not
the
all
orbits.
on an
connecting
If f E X k
are hyperbolic,
equilibria
periodic
accumulate
orbits
number of equilibrium must exclude, among other
a finite
only
look
number
Make the of equilibrium stability
to introduce
set,
problem on the
[1976].
infinite
an
PHASER.
using
defined
Hirsch
example,
system
If you want to know how on a noncompact
Why compact? of vector fields for
norm
CO
chosen.
have
you
planar
invariant
set
which
them. stable then f and periodic orbits. that the situation in the
is structurally
points things,
occur.)))
stability
of the equilibrium point at
the
origin.
to.
Definition
This definition can be rephrased is a source; orbit every and remains away. For our purposes of
properties
dissipative
vector
field
will
We
==
f(x)
V.
The
then there exists a set V the of V the on boundary
that
0, then
If V\"(O)
O.
Since
ellipses.
vector
(Xl) > o.
To establish
the
as
function
< 0;
ifV\"(XI)
eigenvalues, one being point.
and
centers.)
to
14.2. Suppose that Xl is a critical point of a potential x = (Xl, 0) is an equilibrium point of the conservative (14.1). Then
field
can
types
points
that
so
only
correspond-
Lemma V
=I O.
system (14.1)
equilibria
correspond
a
called
point if and
equilibrium
are isolated.
points
V\"
conservative
of the is an
0)
isolated maxima
isolated minima correspond
nondegenerate
points
equilibrium
point is if
415)
Systems
C l function
of the
point
a critical
V at
called
is
xl-axis
easily
critical
of
value
and that a point (Xl, a critical point of the potential
the
Xl
called a
Xl is
point
if V'
IR
It is evident on
lie
A
(Xl) = o. The value. A critical point Xl
: IR
V
Conservative
equilibrium
points and orbits
Theorem orbit and
connecting them.
The)))
416
tems, we now present phase portraits from
their
In
the
same
potential
I)
conservative to determine
systheir
functions.
potential
14.4. The Fish:
Example
x.
of identifying a class of well-behaved several examples and indicate how
intent
the
to
correspond
set of y is
w-limit
the
that
implies
Systems)
saddle points
no two
that
hypothesis
energy value With
and Gradient
Conservative
14:
Chapter
we discussed
7.27,
Example
= X2 . X2 = Xl
the
system)
Xl
This
with the
is conservative
system
V( Xl ) The
critical
minimum, The point
at
point
and thus
the
2 Xl')
function)
potential
I
X
2 I+3
I
3 X I')
the potential is a center
1 of
=
Xl
=-2
-
is a nondegenerate flow. corresponding maximum of the potential function and point (0, 0) of the flow is a saddle point. function
(1, 0)
point
for
the
= 0 is a Xl nondegenerate thus the corresponding equilibrium for the level curves of the energy we Moreover, using the formula function, observe that the right of the unstable manifold of the saddle piece point at the origin is a homoclinic the center. Since there are no loop encircling other inside the loop, all orbits inside the loop are periodic. We equilibria have drawn in Figure 14.1 the graph of the potential function as well as the phase portrait of the Fish. I)
14.5.
Example
Duffing's
equation: V( Xl )
and
the
=
conservative
corresponding
Xl
. X2
Consider the I 2 -2 x I
function)
potential
I 4 4 x I)
+
system)
=
X2
=
Xl
-
3 Xl')
has nondegenerate minima at -1 and 1; thus the at (-1, 0) and (1, 0). Also, there is a nondegenerate maximum at the origin and thus a saddle point at (0, 0). Moreover, using the formula we observe that (14.2) for the level curves of the total energy, the unstable manifold of the saddle The full flow is point is a figure eight. shown in Figure 14.2: inside each there is a center, loop of the figure eight and outside the figure all orbits are periodic. I) eight, The
function
potential field
vector
We
now
has
centers
a pair of
present
unstable manifolds
of
saddle
examples to points in the
the
illustrate flows
of
decisive
conservative
role of
the
systems.)))
14.1. Second-order
Figure portrait
Example
14.1. The potential of the fish in Example 14.6.
function
the
Consider the
corresponding
=
=
(
-\037
\037, 0)
and
manifolds
has
a center
x\037/3
to
the
and
phase
I
2
3x I
+
I 3 gX I
- I x4 4 I)
system)
X2
X2 = -Xl
The vector field minimum of the and
+
function)
potential
conservative Xl
= -xi/2
Systems
14.4.)
V( Xl ) and
V(Xl)
Conservative
(1 -
at (0, 0)
potential function
at
XI)(\037
+
corresponding
o. Also,
Xl).
there are
two
nondegenerate saddle
points,
critical points at corresponding to the nondegenerate 1. To complete the phase we need to look at the unstable portrait, of the saddle points. Since V (1) > V ( manifold))) ), the unstable \037
(1, 0),
417)
418
and Gradient
Conservative
14:
Chapter
Then,
multiplying
(8.15),
we
both sides of this
Now, we multiply Eq. (8.16) from Eq. (8.17) to obtain)
that
we assumed
that
vectors yl
CI
-
Al
0; and
y2
and
A2
corresponding
formation
and
A
by
A2) yl
=1= 0,
DufIing matrix multiplications
yl
and
is not C2
distinct
V(Xl) in
the resulting
==
Example
suffice
the
==
O.
zero
+ -xI/2 14.5.) to exhibit
Since
p-I,
and
theJ=(\037l potential
Consider
P is invertible, we obtain the
Thus,
are
xf/4 and
corresponding
pose
that
Equal A is
linearly
phase
the desired
trans-
we
if desired
V(
(
-
of
\037, 0)
(-
on the
\037, 0)
phase
is a
portrait
\0372)' function)
both sides of this multiply 2 2 - I 3 - I 4 == X X I) Xlsimilarity) ) 3 I 4 gX I
matrix
equation
by
1 conservative = AP = J system) p(\037l
(ii)
the eigen-
of P:)
property
the
this
vector,
eigenvalues
saddle point (1, 0) is above the unstable manifold of == == AP == (AylIAy2) PJ,) A2y2) (AIyll the upper plane. Also, right piece of the unstable manifold homo clinic loop encircling the center . Now, the rest of the where) can readily be filled in, as shown in Figure 14.3. 14.7.
equation
== o.)
(8.16) yields
function
( 8.17))
of the
Example
relations
using
== O.)
then subtract
to two
independent. of the portrait equation of
Now, routine
-
now Eq.
The potential
14.2.
Figure
==
C2 A 2 y2
+
A2 and
by
CI (AI
implies
equation
obtain)
CIAI yl
Since
Systems)
== X2
\0372)')
Xl eigenvalues: There are two cases to consider. First, sup+ X2 == -Xl (1but there two corresponding a double eigenvalue XI)( \037are Xl)'))) linearly)))
14.1. Second-order
Figure
14.3.
portrait
of Example
The
potential
function
V(Xl)
==
Conservative
-
\037xI +
\037x\037
\037xt
Systems
and
phase
14.6.)
function has two nondegenerate As in the previous example, the potential maxirrla, one at -1 and the other at 1, and one nondegenerate minimum at local phase portraits of the two conservative O. Therefore, systems are similar. This the unstahowever, time, Globally, they are quite different. ble of the saddle point (1, 0) sits below that of (-1' manifold 0) because phase portrait V(l) < V(-1)' We have drawn in Figure 14.4 the complete of this system and its potential function. We will return to this and the example
previous
conservative The
effects on example
in the
systems. behavior
the
flow
illustrates.)))
bifurcations
potential function at
infinity
of
second-order
)
of a of the
following section on
corresponding
conservative
can
have
profound
system, as the following
419)
422
Conservative
14:
Chapter
and Gradient
Systems)
following section. Last, we need to avoid the difficulty as exhibited in one or both directions, by the \037 that be unbounded for and function +00 Xl potential prefer they (14.3), with a function The flow of a conservative and Xl \037 -00. potential system the of the can be constructed from these knowledge properties possessing in the
self-evident
boundedness
with
associated
of the saddle unstable manifolds points. we now identify With these remarks, for which the unstable manifolds functions
a class of the
of
desirable
potential
the
saddles determine
flow.)
conservative
A potential function V is
14.9.
Definition
called
generic
if it
satisfies the
conditions:
following
of V; there are finitely many critical points critical of V is non each point degen erate, that is, V\" (Xl) (ii) critical points Xl; values of V are equal; no two maximum (iii) \037 +00 as that is, V 1S unbounded IXll \037 +00, (iv) IV(Xl)1 (i)
\037 +00
Xl
and
Xl
=1= 0
for
for
all
both
\037 -00.)
makes so desirable and generic potentials in context. For this purthis word generic slight 2 to consider the of all functions. we need 0 However, potential pose, space 2 and brevity, we shall now consider 0 functions for the sake of precision interval. This restriction is necessitated by the diffidefined on a compact on the space of functions defined culty of introducing a reasonable topology the requirement on unbounded sets. On a compact interval, (iv) in Definiirrelevant.) tion 14.9 becomes
us now
Let
justify our
explain what abuse
of the
2 functions defined Theorem 14.10. Let C 2 (I) be the set of real-valued 0 I and having no critical at the end points of on a compact interval points 2 the 0 with the interval. Also, endow this function space topology. Then 2 2 in C (I) has a neighborhood in C (I) such that a given generic potential in of vector field this neighborhood the conservative any potential function is topologically to the vector field of the given generic potential equivalent of generic potentials in C 2 (I) is open and the subset function. Moreover, dense.
0)
refrain from giving a formal of this theorem; however, here proof of the basic ingredients. The first part of this result follows from the Implicit Function Theorem. A small 0 2 perturbation of the origand the type of nondegenerate critical the number points
We are
some
essentially
leaves inal generic
function Moreover, the inequality of the unchanged. remains unaffected. Finally, you must convince yourselves manifolds of the saddle the relative positions of the unstable points also preserved under perturbations. For the second part of the theorem)))
maximum that are
potential
values
Figure 14.5. The bounded phase portrait of Example
The
Both
portraits
lent. The source as x \037 +00. There
potential
potential
functions
potential
phase
of the
importance
pared with the
are
of the of
the
certain
functions
which
14.1. Second-order
Conservative
function
-Xle-
potential
V(Xl)
Systems
X1
and)
14.8.)
potential (14.3) =
V(Xl)
have corresponding
difficulty
noteworthy facilitate
!x\037
a single
the
when com-
self-evident
becomes of
harmonic
linear
oscillator.
nondegenerate minimum, but the are not equivasystems
conservative
is the
common the
of
boundedness
characteristics
analysis
of the
the
potential
of
the
corresponding
(14.3)
foregoing con-
of The most apparent is the nondegeneracy feature of phase portraits. At the critical points for ease of local determination the number of critical First, level, there are three key elements. global the critical values of is finite. Second, points anyone of these potenobservation will become))) of this tial functions are distinct; the importance servative
vector
fields.
421)
422
Conservative
14:
Chapter
and Gradient
Systems)
following section. Last, we need to avoid the difficulty as exhibited in one or both directions, by the \037 that be unbounded for and function +00 Xl potential prefer they (14.3), with a function The flow of a conservative and Xl \037 -00. potential system the of the can be constructed from these knowledge properties possessing in the
self-evident
boundedness
with
associated
of the saddle unstable manifolds points. we now identify With these remarks, for which the unstable manifolds functions
a class of the
of
desirable
potential
the
saddles determine
flow.)
conservative
A potential function V is
14.9.
Definition
called
generic
if it
satisfies the
conditions:
following
of V; there are finitely many critical points critical of V is non each point degen erate, that is, V\" (Xl) (ii) critical points Xl; values of V are equal; no two maximum (iii) \037 +00 as that is, V 1S unbounded IXll \037 +00, (iv) IV(Xl)1 (i)
\037 +00
Xl
and
Xl
=1= 0
for
for
all
both
\037 -00.)
makes so desirable and generic potentials in context. For this purthis word generic slight 2 to consider the of all functions. we need 0 However, potential pose, space 2 and brevity, we shall now consider 0 functions for the sake of precision interval. This restriction is necessitated by the diffidefined on a compact on the space of functions defined culty of introducing a reasonable topology the requirement on unbounded sets. On a compact interval, (iv) in Definiirrelevant.) tion 14.9 becomes
us now
Let
justify our
explain what abuse
of the
2 functions defined Theorem 14.10. Let C 2 (I) be the set of real-valued 0 I and having no critical at the end points of on a compact interval points 2 the 0 with the interval. Also, endow this function space topology. Then 2 2 in C (I) has a neighborhood in C (I) such that a given generic potential in of vector field this neighborhood the conservative any potential function is topologically to the vector field of the given generic potential equivalent of generic potentials in C 2 (I) is open and the subset function. Moreover, dense.
0)
refrain from giving a formal of this theorem; however, here proof of the basic ingredients. The first part of this result follows from the Implicit Function Theorem. A small 0 2 perturbation of the origand the type of nondegenerate critical the number points
We are
some
essentially
leaves inal generic
function Moreover, the inequality of the unchanged. remains unaffected. Finally, you must convince yourselves manifolds of the saddle the relative positions of the unstable points also preserved under perturbations. For the second part of the theorem)))
maximum that are
potential
values
14.1. Second-order on the density the Appendix
of
to
one resorts
potentials
generic
Conservative
\"Sard's
423)
Systems see
Theorem;\"
the theorem above with the structural It is important to contrast stain results the To be a conservative previous chapter. sure, system bility with a generic potential is not always stable because it may structurally in the form have a saddle connection of a homo clinic loop. However, if we allow only conservative perturbations of a conservative system whose a system with potential is generic many critical points, then such finitely in a limited way, remains qualitatively intact. This is structural stability of conservative systems. only in the confines With these remarks, we conclude our study of generic potentials and the possibilities that arise when we encounter a nongeneric consider potential.)
Exercises)
,,\037.o)
14.1. Determine the potential functions of the second-order conservative below. From these functions, construct the phase portraits: (c) x+x-x
=0;
critical
nondegenerate
we
14.4.
of a
points
14.3. A minimum for the potential does function V(Xl) that has a minimum of (Xl,
=0.)
(d) x+x(l-x)(O.l-x)
=0;
14.2. Prove that
3
(b)x+x-x
(a)x+x+x3=0;2
potential
not imply a at Xl and yet
0) in
which all orbits of Eq. (14.1) are the function V (x 1) to be analytic?
require
A maximum for the potential that has a V(Xl) (Xl, 0) is stable. Can this
function
systems
not
does
at
maximum
center: there is
require
the
are
isolated.
a
potential
Find
no
Can
periodic.
imply instability: Xl and yet the
if we
happen
function
neighborhood this happen
Find a
potential
point
equilibrium
function
if
V(Xl)
to be
analytic?
14.5.
Unstable
that
manifolds
\"the unstable
say
flow of a generic about this difficult and portraits from generic
of the
conservative, 2
of
H : JR --t
of
the
prove
function.\" Even if vague problem, use
potential
somewhat
a
to the
result
points determine the
saddle
you
the
are fact
apprehensive draw phase
to
potentials.
flows
sinks
.
q=
8H(q,
. p=-
p)
8p
8H(q,
p)
8q)
is called
effect
structure
area: The result of this problem preserve explains the or sources in the phase of Hamiltonian, hence portraits 1 Recall from Section 7.4 that, for a given 0 function systems. JR, the planar system)
14.6. Hamiltonian absence
and
it all: Formulate
manifolds
a Hamiltonian system with
the
Hamiltonian
function
H.)))
424
that
Show
(a)
and Gradient
Conservative
14:
Chapter
the total
be
Do
the
consider
of a
energy
a region, say, with image of Do under
That
is, consider
the
set
is the
solution
the
equation
of
prove
D(t),
of
D(t)
a
for
Hamiltonian
14.8.
14.9.
the
draw
of a
planar
= { O. Using
for
A =
0, the potential On the other -1).
function
conservative
corresponding
==
X2
(1 - xI)(l +
X2 = -Xl
with
as
A
A +
Xl))
in Figure 14.7. in the dynamics
depicted
There is clearly
that
system)
Xl
changes
Xl)
V(O,
see
we
a bifurcation
of
the
A ==
at
equation
o.
negative values, the homo clinic orbit defined by the unstable manifold of the saddle point at (-1 - A, 0) becomes larger, coinciding of the of the stable and unstable manifold saddle eventually with parts orbits between the two saddle points. heteroclinic point (-1, 0) to form For A -+ 0 from positive values, a phenomenon similar to that for negative A occurs but with the role of the saddle ) points interchanged. As A -+ 0 from
amples
In fact, with two maximal
14.13.
Example
A
two preceding
ex-
families of potential one does not expect vary, to coincide, or to have
only one
to
parameter
values of the potential critical points merge more than two nondegenerate point. In lieu of making this statement precise, we function depending on two parameters.) than
more
the
in
encountered
for one-parameter
situations
typical
represent
functions.
we have
that
bifurcations
The
critical
a degenerate
Consider
potential:
two-parameter
to now
a potential
present
the potential
func-
tion)
V(A, on
depending of
the
for
values
small
Since the can be
the cusp
two
corresponding
real parameters conservative
4J-l3
curve =
2 as
27 A ,
critical
in the
A and
==
X2
X2
==
-A
-
J-l. We
are
now
ixi the bifurcations
analyze
+
x\037)
zero.
the zeros of a cubic In fact, we showed for
J-l )-space
shown in Figure
-
field)
J-lXI
near V
points.
(A,
+ !J-lxi
vector
Xl
of the parameters critical points of
at most three
bifurcation
= AXI
Xl)
J-l,
14.8.)))
the critical
there
polynomial, in
Chapter
points
of
V
2 that is the
14.2. Bifurcations
Figure 14.7. potential corresponding
V(A,
of the
Formation Xl)
phase
==
\037(1 +
portraits
A)xi
heteroclinic kAX\037
are on
the
in
Conservative
orbits in the \037xt
following
with
equal
page.)))
bifurcation
maxima.
Systems
of the
The
429)
430
Chapter
14:
Conservative
and Gmdient
Systems)
\\ \\ \\.)
Figure
14.7
Continued.)))
14.2. Bifurcations
in
Conservative
Systems
p.) 8) A)
c)
A)
3)
c)
If is ('\\,
Bifurcations
14.8.
Figure
AXI +
!J-tXI
in \037xf
J-L) lies
('\\,
a nondegenerate =
the
J-L)
of the
Example
potential
two-parameter
this cusp, there is maximum and the flow
below
only one is just
has
For
the
J-t,
critical
point
a hyperbolic = 0 and it is
the only critical of V is Xl point an unstable equilibrium point. values on the cusp, the potential parameter
(0, 0),
flow
V (A,
Xl)
14.13.)
of V which saddle. For degenerate;
only
function
has
two
maximum, and the other As the parameter values cross into the cusp, the maximum and a nondea critical point splits into degenerate nondegenerate in 14.11. the the as Inside critical points cusp, Example generate minimum, are two nondegenerate maxima and a nondegenerate minimum, but always the flows are not equivalent for all parameter values. Indeed, there are pahave the same maximum values; rameter values at which the two maxima As parameter values such values are exactly the positive parameter J-L-axis. turns into two heteroclinic the orbit homoclinic cross the positive J-L-axis, as in Example 14.12. and then back to a homo orbits clinic orbit, critical points, one of of which is degenerate.
another dynamics.)))
class
is a
nondegenerate
of second-order dynamics and bifurcations to We turn attention now our systems, gradient systems. fields defined in terms of a function of vector yet with different
concludes
This
conservative
which
our study of
431)
432
14:
Chapter
and Gradient
Conservative
Systems)
Exercises)
14.10.
,.\037.0)
Perturbations bifurcations
of
bounded
in the
potentials:
the
for
flows
real parameter, potential functions
A a
For
following
the
discuss
are
which
in one or both directions: - xle- X1 ; (i) V(Xl) = A = 1 V A - cos Xl. (ii) ( Xl)
bounded
14.11. Small perturbations at infinity Given a potential may change the flow: tion Vo (z ) which approaches 00 as I z I \037 00 and V\037( z) > 0 for Iz I large, \037 00 as that there is a perturbation Izi \037 V.x(z) such that V.x(z) also has two critical points which 00 as A \037 O. approach a pendulum of mass m and length Rotating pendulum: Consider strained to oscillate in a plane with rotating angular velocity w vertical line. If u denotes the angular of the pendulum deviation vertical and I is the moment of inertia, then)
14.12.
.. Iu -
l
ii where
A =
2.
SIn u
the time scale, this
changing
By
2
mw
9/
2 (w
attention to the
+ mgl
-
A)
.
u =
sIn
sin u
=
the flows for each flow.
>
A
0 paying
Discuss the bifurcations on two parameters,
14.3. this
Gradient we section, of functions.
the
in A and
X2 = A X2 =
flows of the
equations
following
the
bifurca-
depending
p,:
+
-(Xl
Vector
particular
178.
14.14.
In
a the
from
0,)
Show that the following are Hamiltonian and discuss equations tions in the flow for nonnegative values of the parameters: - dXl). X2 = -X2( c (i) Xl = Xl (a - bX2), Hint: Let Xl = e q and X2 = e P . - Xl)(a - bX2), X2 = -x2(1(ii) Xl = Xl(l X2)(C dXl). q q P P = = Hint: Let Xl e /(1 + e ) and X2 e /(1 + e ).
Xl = X2, Xl = X2,
l conabout
0 .)
14.13.
(i)
and
in the
bifurcations
Help: Consult Hale [1980], p.
(ii)
show. 00
to)
equivalent u
(cos
Discuss
l).
is
cos u
func-
P,Xl
-
-
x\037;
p,)(1
- Xl)(l
+A
+ Xl).)
Fields)
of planar vector investigate a class What makes these gradient vector is the simplicity of their asymptotic
fields
that are
gra-
worthy of a section of their own the (}dynamics: and w-limit sets of bounded orbits belong to the set of equilibria. Following a short summary of rudimentary as a consefacts, we establish this result dients
quence of the observation
that
the
defining
function
fields
is nonincreasing
along)))
14.3. Gradient the solutions of a gradient ter 9. We then explore
also
14.14. If F : JR2 -
the
-
The points at
the
which
the
_
a
2
=
F_ (x))
8Xl8x2
-
a
2
-
F
8X28x2 (x))
(x))
8X28xl
point of F ifV' F(x) the eigenvalues of the Hessian
a critical
be
if
8Xl8xl (x) F
of
significance
derivatives
partial
2
the
the
to
correspond
definition:
nondegenerate
a
vanishes
To underline
following
2 a F
is)
equations
(14.4))
of F
(14.4).
x is said to
critical point x is called the matrix of the second
differential
-V'F(x).)
gradient
system
A point
14.15.
Definition
x,
vector
)
aX2
system of
gradient
corresponding
of the gradient equilibria we introduce such points,
at
gradient
\037F(X)
\037F(X),
( aXl x =
o. A
the
function,
systems that
is)
-V'F(x) and
Chap-
of several specific Using these examples as
C2
is a
---t JR
from
Principle
some of which are old favorites. a subclass of structurally stable gradient identify in the of gradient vector fields. space generic
Definition field
dynamics
Fields
bifurcations
we
guide,
are
Invariance
and
systems,
gradient
a
and the
system the
Vector
nonzero.)
are
case
In the
of the
dynamics
geometry
the
of
of
Lemma 14.16. An bolic if
critical
nondegenerate
lEx is a hyperbolic . x is an unstable . x is asymptotically
of a
point
equilibrium
and only if the
critical
corresponding
of (14.4),
equilibrium
node
if and
precise information
points,
corresponding equilibria can of the function F. graph
be
if
if and
only if
on the local
is hypergradient system (14.4) point of F is nondegenerate.
then
only if F has an isolated and only if F has an isolated
stable
the
from
obtained
maximum minimum
at x; at
x;
. x is a
saddle
point
F has a
saddle
at
x.
of this lemma is that the mafor the verification key observation an equilibrium of the linear variational equation about point of the is F evaluated at that point. the Hessian matrix of system (14.4) the Hessian matrix are real it is a of because symmetric eigenvalues The
trix gradient The
matrix. bolic
The that
points
correspond
to hyper-
of gradient
systems is
points.
most remarkable
equilibrium
critical
nondegenerate
Consequently,
equilibrium
points
aspect
of
are the
only
the possible
dynamics limit
sets.)))
433)
434
and Gradient
Conservative
14:
Chapter
tem (14.4),
is a
If ,+(xO)
14.17.
Theorem
bounded
of a
orbit
positive
the set
set w(xO) belongs to are isolated, points
w-limit
the
then
Systems)
gradient sys-
of
of
equilibria
then such an w-limit Eq. (14.4). If the equilibrium then as IIxll ---t +00, set is a single equilibrium point. If F(x) ---t +00 is bounded. orbit of Similarly, if,- (xO) is a Eq. (14.4) every positive the a-limit set then orbit of a bounded gradient system (14.4), negative If the of to the set of equilibrium equilibria Eq. (14.4). a(xO) belongs an a-limit set is a single equilibrium point. points are isolated, then such ---t is -00 as Ilxll ---t +00, If F(x) then every negative orbit of Eq. (14.4) bounded.
the
We indicate
Proof.
of Eq.
solution
(14.4)
for
proof
for
t
positive
0, then the
>
orbits.
If x(t)
derivative
of
is a
F
bounded
such a
along
solution satisfies) d
dt the
Now,
to the set
Invariance of
Principle
of Section
o.)
9.4 implies
that
equilibria are isolated, set is connected. The statement If the
equilibria.
the limit point because of positive orbits is a
first
1.
from the
examples
membrane.
vibrating
a gradient
Show that
plane cannot
on the
system
have
orbit.)
system:
that the
the
Consider
set
w-limit
conservative
damped .
X2 = Xl
= X2,)
Xl
Show
the
for
the global
Identify
A nongradient
(a)
.
X2 =
+ Xl,)
membranes
orbits:
clinic
a homo
2
b XlX2
reaction-diffusion
homoclinic
No
Xl) +
-
-J.L(X2
system)
gradient
-
vibrating
attractors:
Global
text, the 14.21.
of the
flow
Xl
coming
(3 E JR.
for X2 =
o.
J.L >
14.19. Analyze
is generic,
field
vector
Fields
system, determine the and discuss
a gradient
is
the
Vector
of every
-
Xl
3 -
system)
X2.)
solution exists and
an
is
equilibrium
point.
that this
(b) Show Hint:
14.23.
gradient system.
of the linear variational
equation at the
(1, 0).
point
equilibrium
be a
cannot
system
the eigenvalues
Compute
is a theory of una function and its gradient vector There field: a function which is one of the cornerstone ideas of folding catastrophe theory. of the function F (Xl, X2) = \037(x\037 + x\037) For example, the universal unfolding is the three-parameter family of functions) Unfolding
F(Al,
A2,
A3, Xl,
X2) =
\037(x\037+
X\037)
- AlXlX2
-
A2Xl
-
A3X2.)
catastrophe, the set in the three-dimensional parameter space its number of preimages, associated with this function the umbilic. of the corresponding Explore the phase portrait hyperbolic field. this gradient vector field in vector One could also unfold gradient of the two unfoldings raises the set of gradient vector fields. Comparison in the second reference below. issues, as discussed interesting facts about catastrophe theory the hyperbolic General References: including The Poston and Stewart umbilic can be found in, for example, [1978]. gradient vector field above is discussed by Guckenheimer in Peixoto [1973]. calls the
Thom
for
14.24.
which
Unfolding
F changes
the
elliptic
elementary catastrophes F(Al,
A2, A3,
Xl,
Another entry in Thom's
umbilic:
X2)
the
is
=
unfolding -
\037X\037
of the
\037X\037X2+
elliptic
AlXl +
famous
list
of seven
umbilic)
A2X2
+ A3(X\037 + x\037).)))
439)
440
and Gradient
Conservative
14:
Chapter
the
Explore
phase portrait
Stewart the
subject
erence Milnor
and
@)'@)
functions
of
[1963]. of
application
is a de
case
not
played
a prominent points
Sard's
role throughout this chapof a real-valued function the
and
Appendix
of the
statement
The
continuum
Melo
[1982].
are not isolated single point; see, for Henry
further
for
[1983]
for our purposes
Theorem
ref-
standard
of Sard
Theorem
is on
is
given
details. 37
page
in
A of
elements it is possible
of the set that
of
the
of equilibria; such an example are several applications and yet the w-limit set
is
There
Aulbach
example,
of a gradient set of a bounded on page 14 of Palis
equilibria
w-limit
where of
a
the
bounded
[1984], Hale and
equilibrium orbit is
Massatt
a
[1982],
[1981].
Gradient catastrophe
the
where
isolated,
points and
gradient.)
[1963].
In the system are orbit
function.
in Poston and elliptic umbilic is stored in
of the
field
name
consult Milnor [1965] or Smith
the Appendix; Milnor
under the
study of nondegenerate critical of Morse see the Theory;
A deep
relevant
elliptic
of this
field
is contained
umbilic
Notes)
Critical points is the
vector
gradient
vector
gradient
of PHASER
library
Bibliographical
ter.
The
[1978].
the
of
about the
Help: Information
Systems)
systems have theory; Zeeman
see, [1977]. for
diverse
example,
uses.
play They Thorn [1969],
an important Poston and
role
in
Stewart
in Morse In differential topology, especially to anone flows vector fields to take one manifold along gradient theory, as in are in described Milnor Similar ideas used Smale other, [1963]. [1961 in higher In and to affirm the Poincare conjecture dimensions. 1961a] numerical analysis, computing methods under the names \"conjugate graor descent\" essentially consist of flowing dient\" \"steepest along gradient vector fields; see, for example, Conte and deBoor [1972]. Because of the an equilibrium, fact that bounded solutions approach computations yield convergent results. The of a vibrating membrane is studied in Chow, Hale, and example Mallet-Paret is for reaction-diffusion equations [1976]. A good reference Fife [1979]. It is evident that the dynamics of a gradient are essentially system determined by the equilibria and the possible orbits between connecting of This observation can be made and equilibria. precise practical any pair combinatorics. the vertices of a graph One associates by resorting to simple with equilibria and the edges with orbits. Such graphs are used connecting all two-dimensional to classify as explained gradient flows, by Peixoto in Peixoto [1973] and Hale [1977]. It is not possible to characterize all structurally stable systems in dithan two. However, there is a nice result in Smale [1961]))) mensions greater [1978],
and
14.3. Gradient and Palis and ifold
of
any
and
transversal
turally
stable,
in the set
of
Smale
dimension:
for
gradient
vector
gradient systems with
intersection
of
stable
stable structurally gradient systems.)))
and all
[1970]
and
fields only
unstable
on
Vector
a compact
hyperbolic
manifolds
gradient systems are
open
Fields
man-
equilibria
are strucand
dense
441)
15)
Planar
Maps)
After
about
time,
a dozen
here to
return
some
nar maps.
the
of the
chapters of
theme
on
differential
basic dynamics and
Our motives
for
delving
we
equations,
3 and
Chapter
explore, this
bifurcations
into
planar
of
pla-
maps are
scalar maps; namely, as nuof differential equaapproximations with an introduction to tions or as Poincare maps. We begin our exposition a linearizaof linear section on the dynamics Then, planar maps. following of planar tion, we turn to numerical analysis and give examples maps arisof planar differential equations or from approximations ing from \"one-step\" of scalar differential we Afterwards, equations. \"two-step\" approximations of bifurcations of fixed points, includundertake, as usual, a detailed study bifurcation for maps. The final part of ing the Poincare-Andronov-Hopf an important the is devoted to a synopsis of area-preserving maps, chapter
akin to
merical
the
ones
for
studying
of solutions
The mechanics and possessing a rich class arising from classical history. rather sosubject of planar maps is a vast one that is also mathematically with innocuous continue appearances maps phisticated. Yet, many planar mathematical of this to defy satisfactory Indeed, the purpose analysis. with is to several famous albeit plamodest, acquaint long, chapter you and nar maps encourage you to explore their dynamics on the computer; mathematical for further nourishment, we will refer you to other sources.)))
444
Planar
15:
Chapter
Linear
15.1.
Maps)
Maps 2 2 \037 IR ,
For a given function f : IR
the first-order
consider
equation)
planar
difference
= f(x n ),)
xn+1
(15.1))
iteration under the map f. To avoid drowning in sub or suthe function f to the forefront, it is often as to bring as well perscripts, such a difference convenient to write equation as) is an
which
\037
x
section, after several of maps in the
f(x).)
we explore the geometry remarks, linear function. and many of the concepts from the Most of the necessary notation as 3 are to of scalar in maps expounded Chapter generalized theory easily have that studied Since it is that chapter a planar maps. quite likely you let us several of record these For while rapidly generalizations. long ago, 2 xo in IR is the of a the of sequence point instance, positive images orbit,+ of xo under the successive compositions of the map f:) In this
of
brief
orbits
the
(xo) =
,+ If the
map f is invertible, of f-1 with
composition
O
,-(X
)
{xO, f(xO), ..., we
itself,
=
general f is a
case
the define O
),
and both the positive negative union of the two: ,(xO) = ,+(xO) U The most notable positive orbit under
Definition 15.1.
A
A
fixed
point
such that, IIfn(xO)
x of
-
for xii
is not stable.
x E IR
point
f is said to
every
point
is said
and, in addition, there is an r > all xO satisfying Ilxo - xii < r.) Orbits role
in the
that
are fixed
dynamics
points
of planar
2 is
to
of
maps.)))
n-fold to
xO
be)
...}.)
),
one
fixed
orbit,
of
of f
is the
of a single
consisting
point
xO
if f(x)
= x.
any e > 0, there is a 8 > 0 the iterates of xO satisfy if it x is said to be unstable point if it is stable stable asymptotically if, for
-
fixed
0
of
O
exist, the
called a
Ilxo
A
o.
f-n(x
map is of the map.
stable
be
which
...,
,-(xO). of a
all iterates
the
the negative
orbits
When
point that is fixed
f-n to denote orbit,-
notation
use and
{xO, f-1(x
. . . }.)
fn(xO),
be
such
some
xII < 8,
that
iterate
fn(xO)
of a
\037 x
as n
map playa
\037 +00
prominent
for
15.1. Linear 15.2. A point x* E ]R2 is called a periodic point Definition n period iffn(x*) == x* and n is the least such positive integer. is called a periodic orbit. all iterates of a periodic point of stability, asymptotic stability, and the are immediate by considering corresponding
orbits
the
appropriate
of the
power
minimal
of
The set
instability for
notions
The
odic
445)
Maps
of
peri-
fixed points of
map.
orbit 15.3. A point y is called an w-limit point of the positive of positive ofxo if there is a sequence integers ni such that ni ---+ set w(xO) of ,+ (xO) is the The w-limit and fni (xO) ---+ y as i ---+ +00. +00 f set of In is the a-limit the case set of all its w-limit invertible, points.
Definition
,+(xO)
,-
defined
is
(xO)
15.4.
Definition
f iff(M)
point y
==
After linear
planar
such
M
in
A
that
M,
by taking
similarly
any x
is, for that f(y)
integers.
negative
under the map f(x) E M and there is a
invariant
be
we have
M
in
be
to
said to
in ]R2 is
M
set
ni
== x.
these generalities, we now turn A linear map on ]R2, maps.
to the
main
of this
topic
is given
a basis,
in
section-
by)
x\037Ax)
for some 2 x 2
images
xO
of
matrix A.
, As
in
the
Form
powers of the \302\260
{ x,
planar
A
\302\260 X,...,
A
is the
]R2
n
of
sequence
matrix:)
coefficient \302\260
x,....)
}
we can use the equations, the orbits of matrix A to compute the a let us determine effect of this, x if P an 2 2 is invertible Eq. (15.2):
differential
linear
of a coefficient
the linear map (15.2). To accomplish on the orbits linear transformation matrix,
of xO E
orbit
positive
+ X 0 -_ ( )
case of
Normal
Jordan
The
the positive
under
(15.2))
of
then)
A p)n
(p-l
==
p-l
A np)
(15.3))
matrix a transformation any positive integer n. Consequently, we choose p so that p-l A P is in Jordan Normal Form, and compute. As we saw in Form. of a matrix in Normal the powers Chapter 8, it is easy to compute of linear maps and of several Let us now analyze the dynamics examples portraits. plot their phase for
Example
A
15.5.
matrix in Jordan
sink:
hyperbolic
0.9
0
o
0.8
( We
first
need
to find the solutions
following coefficient
.)
A==
determine the
the
Consider
Form:)
Normal
of
fixed
the
points
linear
of the
) linear map
system (A
- I)x
x
== O.
\037 A
Since
x,
that A -
is,
I
is)))
446
Planar
15:
Chapter
Maps)
xO
x 1 . X 2)
.
.
.
.
..
.
...
..
.
..
,:::\"
.)
...:::::::::;\"'.+..u:;::::::::
A single
15.1.
Figure
in Example
the
invertible,
of A
powers
and
orbit,
x =
origin are
given
0 is the
origin is an how
infer
of A
are
v2
(0,
=
that An
0.9
sink
hyperbolic
and
of the
point
linear
map.
The
stable
0 \302\267)
0 the
approaches
asymptotically
a positive
fixed
only
(0.9)n (
is evident
portrait of the
by)
An =
It
the phase
15.5.)
(0.8)n ) zero
fixed
matrix as n as seen
point,
notice orbit approaches the origin, 0.8 with corresponding eigenvectors
1), respectively.
A nxO
For any initial =
(0.9)nx\037 v
value
l
xo
=
+ (0.8)nxg
\037 +00.
that v (x\037,
v
2
Thus,
in Figure 15.1.
.)))
the To
the eigenvalues l = (1, 0) and
xg),
we have)
15.1. Linear the Consequently, y2 than in the
of
When
positive orbits of
direction
static
examining
should keep in mind that not a continuous connected to interpret certain phase
Example 15.6. A
the
approach
y I.
faster
origin
in the
direction
pictures of phase portraits of planar orbit is just a sequence of discrete curve. As a result, it could at times portraits. Here is an example of this
an
Consider the
with reflection:
sink
hyperbolic
Maps
maps points
you and
difficult
be
sort. linear
map
the coefficient matrix)
with
A= the
Following
and the
notations
any initial vector xo = Anx
O
(x\037,
=
x\037),
0.9 .)
(
\302\260)-\037.8)
computations in
the
example,
previous
for
have
we
+ (-I)n(0.8)n
(0.9)nX\037yl
xg
y 2.)
A nxO \037 0 as n \037 +00 for every xO. However, due to the presence Again, the of the negative eigenvalue, orbit through xO jumps back and positive curves see forth across the xl-axis; 15.2. If we try to fit smooth Figure the points on an orbit, there would usually be a piece above the through a cusp at the origin. the two forming xl-axis and another one below,
15.7.
Example
A
A = whose we
eigenvalues have)
1 (10
1\0372)')
than one. For any initial
are greater A nxO
the coefficient matrix)
Consider
source:
hyperbolic
= (1.1)nx\037
yl
xg
+ (1.2)n
x
value
O =
(x\037,
x\037),
y2.
is an unstable that the origin fixed point; see Figure 15.3. of the inverse of this map, A -n , by considering the iterates it is easy to deduce that the a-limit set of any point is the origin. A hyperbolic saddle: Consider the coefficient 15.8. matrix) Example
It
is evident
Furthermore,
1.1
A=
,)
( with
one
Since
for
and the other
eigenvalue greater any initial vector Anx
O
\302\260)O\0379)
xO
=
=
we (x\037, x\037),
(1.I)nx\037yl
the origin is unstable. However, = (0, 0); see Figure 15.4. a(x\037, 0)
larger
unlike )
than
one in
absolute value.
have
+ (0.9)nxgy2,) a source,
w(O,
x\037)
(0,
0)
and)))
447)
448
Chapter
15:
Planar
Maps)
x 1) x 3) x 5)
-........)
x 4) x 2)
XO)
...
.I . . '. ......: : . . .. ..) . . . . . . .'. : \":.. : ;.:\037:\037\037':i\037i!j!...I...:.:
A single and the phase portrait of the orbit, in Example 15.6.)
15.2. Figure with reflection
Example
linear map:
A nonhyperbolic
15.9.
A =
whose
every an
eigenvalues
on point initial vector
A nxO
we
have
point;
w(x\037,
x\037)
see Figure
=
(0,
15.5.
x\037).
)))
=
( 01')
It
now
is evident
linear
system)
) that,
in addition to since the
Moreover,
point.
(0.9)nx\037
the
0
0.9
are 0.9 and 1. Observe the x2-axis is a fixed xo = (x\037, x\037) are)
Consider
sink
hyperbolic
v
l
+ xg
the origin, iterates
v 2 ,)
that the origin is a
stable
fixed
of
15.1. Linear
15.3. Phase
Figure
.
.
.
.
',.,
,.
.'
Figure
:'
::
.
..
source in Example
hyperbolic
.. .. ..
. .
.
,;
\037. : , ;;;
.'\"
:;;::::'+h)ZlZ\037
equilibrium point f}
-
Yn+l
(15.15) to
algorithm
resulting
A
equation
then
yields
map:)
equivalent
(\037\037)
equilibrium
- Yn-l
Yn+l
At A = 0 this is reduced to it becomes Euler's algorithm.
\037
The
A )
Euler's
while
A < 1.
0
0 and This of PHASER under the name Help: map is stored in the library singer. a. We that < say [1978] where this map first appeared.) Ixl see Singer Also, Big
them
f(x) =
o(g(x))
as
x
\037 0
< clg(x)1 for Ix I < 8.) is a 8 > 0 such that If(x)1 if, for any c > 0, there Notes) Bibliographical @)'@) Here are some examples of these notations: The dynamics has been dealing with monotone maps since the cornmunity 3 = 3 as x \037 = 0(1), sin x = O(x), 0; ) as we cosx shall see in the next chapter. 0(xThe study of nonindays of Poincare, I as x \037 o. e- / ixi = o(xn) 1 cosx = o(x), sin x = 0(1), in the early seventies, vertible real scalar became maps, however, popular from state ainto series a large of theorems Until further The analysis. review article and We next turned notice, by Whitley eventually industry.
-
x-I + x-
found Smith [1983]. the proofs of books these results can and be and the Eckmann and Devaney in, for[1980] example, by Collet [1983], [1986]We Theorem for real-valued functions the Intermediate-value of with and more. the basics of Ita. is real interesting variable. to that one of the most remarkable on note theorems in scalar was Sharkovskii before the maps already proved subject is conIf the function [1964]f : [a, b] \037 IR Intermediate-value Theorem. see also Stefan [1977]. A special became was rediscovered c E (a, b) so inthat tinuousvogue; and f(a) < 0 < f(b), then there existscasea point an article =0.) with a provocative title by Li and Yorke [1975]. f(c) The surprising biperiod-doubling geometric nature of the successive Theorem a real-valued The two statements are the Mean-value furcations innextlogistic-like observed maps was numerically by ofFeigenbaum The gradient denotedbybyLanford))) function of a real This or vector variable.property V'.))) and 1980]. \"universal\" was lateris proved [1978 cover commence some
540
Appendix)
open interval
the
on
differentiable
interval [a,
X2 on the
b],
-
and x 2
xl
are
to x 2 .
L from xl
point x
for some
-
(X2
xI)f'
)
the
on
-
line
polynomials.
interval
I,
there
segment
is a
point
such
an open subset in Rn,
U
defined
function 2
(x
-
line
the
contains
and
segment on the set
xl))
mIl -
-
(x
\037k! f(k)(a)
denotes
the kth
approximations.
Suppose
that
If a and
X
f : I
are
a)k +
of
defined
R
two points in
on an open the interval
that)
(m+1
derivative
\037
any
such
them
\037 between
\"
For the
(x).)
L.)
k=O)
f(k)
.
V' f(x)
Theorem regarding
Theorem. Taylor's m l I is a C + function.
=
=
)
and
tool in local analysis is approximation of functions The next two statements are the scalar and vector ver-
sions of Taylor's
f(x)
l
f(x
and
useful
most
The
where
between
that U is Suppose of U such that points If f : U \037 R is a real- valued 2
then
=
for
two
f(x
Scalar
point x
f(XI)
then)
with
b).
R be continuous, any two points Xl them such that)
\037
b]
Then
Theorem.
Mean-value
U,
(a,
is a
there
f(X2)
that
Let f : [a,
Theorem.
Mean-value
Scalar
)
!
function
the
(x
f(m+l)(\037)
-
a)m+l
'
f.
version of Taylor's Theorem, we introduce a bit of integer (iI, i 2 , . .. , in) be an n-vector with nonnegative The norm of i is Iii = i l + i2 + . . . + in. For x E Rn, let xi be components. if f : Rn \037 R has Iii derivatives, the product xi = xi 1 X\0372. . . x\037n. Finally, general
i =
Let
notation.
let)
=
Dif(x)
alii . aX\0371
containing this
If f :
Theorem.
Taylor's
line
the
=
f(x)
,,1
\037
Dd(a)
\037 R
f(x).
aX\037n)
C m+ l function on an open set a to x, then there is a point \037on
is a
from points
segment
such
line segment
Rn
.
. . .
that)
(x
-
\302\267
1\"
a)' +
+
(m
Iii!
I)!
lil\037m
The of
two
next
functions,
two statements both in the
are scalar
about and
the
\037
- a)',\302\267
lil=m+l)
derivatives
vector
Dd(t;,) (x
cases.)))
of the composition
541)
Appendix
Rule. Let f : IR \037 IR and 9 : IR \037 IR be two realChain If f is differentiable at point valued functions of a real variable. a and 9 is 0 = differentiable at f(a), then the function is composite (g f) (x) g(f(x)) Scalar
at a,
differentiable
and)
Chain Rule.
: IRk
f
Let
differentiable at x function g 0 f : IRk
and
g
g : IRm
and
IRm
0 f)
(x) =
Dg(f(x))
tool
\037
0
local
in
that
such
IRn
Then
at f(x). at x, and)
is differentiable
most important
second
The
\037
is differentiable
\037 IRn
D(g
the
f is
composite
Df(x).)
is the
analysis
Inverse and
Theorems.
Function
Implicit
= g'(f(a)) f'(a).)
0 f)'(a)
(g
Function Theorem. Let U be an open set in IRn and let f : k with k > 1. IE a point x E U is such that the be a C function n matrix Df(x) is invertible, then there is an open neighborhood V of is invertible with a C k inverse.) U such that f : V \037 f(V)
Inverse
U
\037 IRn
n x x
in
Function
Implicit
Theorem. C k function
Let U
an
be
set in
open
x
IRm
IRn
and
1. Consider a point (x, y) E U, n = x If x E IRm and y E IR with c. the n n matrix where , y) f(x, y) Dyf(x, of partial derivatives is invertible, then there are open sets Vm C IRm and \037 Vn C IRn with (x, y) E Vm x V n C U and a unique Ck function 1/J : V m = c for all x E Vm . if c V n such that f(x, 1/J(x)) Moreover, =1= f(x, y) x of is The derivative the and function V V E m n 1/J given y =1= 1/J(x). (x, y)
let f : U
by the
\037 IRn
be a
with
k >
formula)
A useful
-
=
D1/J(x)
corollary
[Dyf(x, 1/J(x))]-l Dxf(x,
of the
Implicit
1/J(x)).)
Theorem
Function
is the
following
fact:
geometric
Let U be an open set in IRn and let f : U \037 IRP Theorem. has rank p whenever f(x) = O. differentiable function such that Df(x) in IRn. is an manifold f-1(0) (n p)-dimensional
Submanifold be a Then
In case local
analysis
Theorem; is useful and
Hale
Lemma and
see,
you
are
wondering
what
the
might be, some contend that for
example,
Golubitsky
third it
Malgrange
and Guillemin
in bifurcation theory, although we did not we did [1982]. Two results to which for of Morse and the Theorem of Sard;
1965].)))
most important
is the
result
of
Preparation
[1973].This theorem refer to it; consult Chow refer in the text are the proofs, see Milnor [1963
542
Appendix)
tion. If x is a coordinate
for all
all
2
f(X)/8xi8xj)
U of
a neighborhood
in
-
= f(x)
The integer
y E U.
x,
with
Y\037+
+
+...
Y\037+l
of negative
number
the
is
k
-
...
-
yr
come
we
Finally,
on
dependence
x IRn
to the
subject at
and the
book
We proceed IR
= 0
Yi(X)
Y\037
the
of
eigenvalues
Sard's Theorem. Let U be an open set in IRn and consider differentiable function f : U ---+ IRP. Let C be the set of critical that is, the set of all x E U with rank Df(x) < p. Then f(C) zero in IRP.)
and
local
matrix.
Hessian
our
and
then there is a
is nonsingular,
Yn)
func0
that
such
f(y) for
(8
a sufficiently differentiable of J, that is, D J(x) = point
be
IR
critical
(Y1, ...,
system
i,
---+
IRn
nondegenerate
matrix
Hessian
the
f :
Let
Lemma.
Morse
initial
with a
the
large:
of
U be
of
uniqueness,
initial-value
an
Let
interlude.
notational
first theorem
continuation,
existence,
and parameters
data
the
both
of
generalizations
a sufficiently of f, points has measure
problem.
an open set in
and
f :U
---+ IR
n
Now, suppose that (to, xO) E U and
x = f(t, A function
x).
f(t,
the
consider
initial-value
problem)
= xo.)
x(to)
x),)
(AI))
initial-value problem of t on I and satisfies the initial for each tEl. If cp is a equation (AI) solution of Eq. (AI) on I, then a function \\11 is said to be a continuation of the solution of Eq. (AI) on a larger interval open cp if \\11 is a solution = I and I for An interval is said tEl. to, xO) containing to, xO) \\l1(t, cp(t, to be a maximal interval of existence to a larger if cp has no continuation in an
(AI)
to, xO) is said to cp(t, interval I containing to data and the differential
t---+
(t, x)
;
be
a solution
if cp is a
C
1
of the
function
interval.
Uniqueness,
Existence,
is an open
set
in
x IRn
IR
and Smoothness. Let and consider the initial-value
x = f(t,
(i) If
f E
value ( ato,
(ii)
(Hi)
CO
(U,
IR
x(to)
x),)
f
: U
---+
IRn,
where
U
problem)
= xo.)
n
problem
cp ( t, to, xO) of the ini tial), then there exists a solution defined for all t on a maximal of existence interval
x O , /3to, x O ).
For any closed bounded on W, set W C U, there is 8 > 0, depending such that (t, cp(t, to, xO)) \037 W for t \037 (ato,xo + 8, /3to,xo - 8). If f E Ck(U, IRn), with k > 1, then there exists a unique solution of the initial-value defined on a maximal interval to, problem cp(t, xO)
of
existence;
moreover,
cp is
C
k
in (t, to,
xO).)))
543)
Appendix
Dependence be a vector with
k >
Let U be parameter in an open subset A Parameters.
on
1, then
solution
the
:X: =
is
a C
k
function
The
proofs
and Levinson
of (A, of
f(A,
to, xO) of
t, x),)
open
set in Iff
ofRm.
R x Rn, x U,
the initial-value
x(to) =
and
E Ck(A
Rn),
problem)
xO)
t, to, xO).
these
[1955],
cp(A, t,
an
Hale
two theorems [1980],
Hartman
are, among others,
in
[1964], and Robbin
Coddington [1968].)))
A
References)
J. [1978]. Foundations of Mechanics, Second MARSDEN, Reading, Massachusetts. C. [1982]. Dynamics, the Geometry I-IV. ABRAHAM, R. and SHAW, of Behavior, Aerial Press: P.O. Box 1360, Santa Cruz, California 95061. A. [1929]. \"Application of Poincare's theorem on 'bifurcation ANDRONOV, points' and 'change in stability' to simple autooscillatory systems,\" C. R. Acad. Sci. 189, 559-561. (Paris), and
R.
ABRAHAM,
Edition.
Benjamin/Cummings:
ANDRONOV, A., LEONTOVICH, E.A., GORDON, on Theory of Bifurcations of Dynamic Systems
1.1., and a Plane.
MAIER, A.G.
Wiley:
New
[1973].
York,
New
York.
ANDRONOV, A. and PONTRJAGIN, Nauk., SSSR, 14, 247-251. VITT,
A.,
ANDRONOV,
Pergamon Press: New ANOSOV, D.V. [1967].
[1937].
\"Systemes grossiers,\"
A., and XHAIKIN, S.E. [1966]. Theory New York. \"Geodesic flows and closed Riemannian
Dokl.
Akad.
of Oscillators.
York,
manifolds
with
Proc. Steclov Inst. Math., 90. and KATOK, A.B. [1972]. in smooth ergodic \"New examples theTrans. Mosc. Math. Soc., Am. Math. Soc., 23, diffeomorphisms,\"
curvature,\"
negative
D.V.
ANOSOV,
ory,
L.
Ergodic
1-32. A.,
ARNEODO,
with
attractor [1982]. nikov,\"
J.
Stat. V.1.
quasi-periodic
Math. [1965].
\"Small
Trans.
Sere
new TRESSER, C. [1981].\"Possible Math. Phys., 79, 573-579.
strange
Commun.
chaotic behavior: An illustration of a theorem of Shil27, 171-182. \" Proof of a theorem of A.N. Kolmogorov on the invariance [1963]. motions under small perturbations of the Hamiltonian,\" Russian 9-36.
denominators, 2, 46,
[1971]. \"Matrices
P., and
Phys.,
18,
Surveys,
structure,\"
with
\"Oscillations
ARNOLD, of
COULLET, spiral
I: Mappings
of the
circumference
onto
itself,\"
AMS
26,
29-43.)))
213-284. depending
on parameters,\"
Russian Math.
Surveys,
546
References)
\"Lectures
[1972].
on bifurcations in
versal
families,\"
Russian
Math.
Surveys, 27,
54-119. Equations.
Differential
Ordinary
[1973].
[1978]. Mathematical Methods New York, Heidelberg, Berlin.
of Classical
M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Mechanics. Springer-Verlag, New York,
Methods in the Theory Geometrical of Ordinary Differential Equations, [1983]. New 250. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Springer-Verlag: Berlin. York, New York, Heidelberg, New York, New York, Heidelberg, Theory. Springer-Verlag: [1984]. Catastrophe Berlin. Mechanics. ARNOLD, V.1. and AVEZ , A. [1968]. Ergodic Problems of Classical New New Amsterdam. York, York, Benjamin: R. [1980]. \"A D.G., CHORY, M.A., HALL, G.R., and McGEHEE, ARONSON, to in New Approaches wild discrete behavior,\" system with subtly dynamical P. (Ed.), 339-359. SIAM Publications: Nonlinear Problems in Dynamics, Holmes, Pennsylvania.
Philadelphia,
of maps circle for two- parameter families Commun. Math. Phys., 83, 303-354. near Manifolds B. [1984]. Continuous and Discrete AULBACH, Dynamical Systems New York, New Lect. Notes in Math., Vol. 1094. of Equilibria. Springer-Verlag: Berlin. York, Heidelberg,
[1982]. \"Bifurcations of the plane: a computer
an
from
invariant
assisted
study,\"
Physics Today, 39 (12), 38-45. of number fields in the plane have a finite vector \"Quadratic BAMON, limit cycles,\" Publications Mathematiques, I.H.E.S., 64, 111-142. M. [1988]. Fractals San Diego. BARNSLEY, Everywhere. Academic Press: I. [1901]. \"Sur les courbes definies par des equations differentielles,\" BENDIXSON, Acta. Math., 24, 1-88. of the Henon map,\" L. [1991]. \"The dynamics BENEDICKS, M. and CARLESON, Ann. Math., 133, 73-169. Numerische \"On invariant closed curves for one-step methods,\" BEYN, W.J. [1987]. Mathematik, 51, 103-122. Y.N. Ordinary Differential Analytic BIBIKOV, [1979]. Local Theory of Nonlinear in Math., New Vol. 702. Springer-Verlag: York, New Equations. Lecture Notes York, Heidelberg. 9. G. [1927]. Dynamical Systems, Amer. Math. Soc. Publ., Colloq. BIRKHOFF, Island. Rhode American Mathematical Society: Providence, deformation of a singularity of a vector field on BOGDANOV, R.1. [1981].\"Versal Sel. Math. the plane in the case of zero eigenvalues,\" Sov., 1, 389-421. in the Methods Y.A. [1961].Asymptotic N. and MITROPOLSKI, BOGOLIUBOV, and Breach: New York, New York. Oscillations. Gordon Theory of Nonlinear P.B. [1984]. \"The arithmetic-geometric mean BORWEIN, J.M. and BORWEIN, SIAM of elementary functions,\" and fast computation Rev., 26, 351-366. A \"w-limit sets for Axiom J. Differential R. diffeomorphisms,\" BOWEN, [1975]. 18. Equations, Third Edition, M. [1983]. Differential Equations and Their Applications, BRAUN, HeiNew New Mathematical 15. York, York, Sciences, Applied Springer-Verlag:
BAK,
P. [1986].
\"The
R. [1987].
delberg,
Berlin.)))
Devil's
staircase,\"
References
M. and
BRAUN,
difference [1977]. \"Periodic solutions of finite 35, 139-147. Mathematical Developments Arising from Hilbert J.
HERSHENOV,
equations,\" Quart. Appl. Editor; BROWDER, F. [1976]. of Symposia in Pure Problems, Proceedings Soc.: Providence, Rhode Island. Math.,
CARR, J.
New
Springer-Verlag:
the
of
J. London Math. L. [1963]. Asymptotic
k large,\"
CESARI,
New
Springer-Verlag:
Mathematical
Manifold Theory, Applied New York, Heidelberg,
Berlin.
180-189.
20,
Soc.,
and
Behavior
New York,
York,
N.G. [1934].
CETAEV,
York,
M.L. and LITTLEWOOD, J.E. [1945]. \"On nonlinear differential second order: I. The equation jj-k(1-y2)iJ+y = bAkcos(At+a),
CARTWRIGHT,
equations
of Center
Applications
[1981].
Sciences, 45.
Math.
Amer.
XXVII.
Mathematics,
sur
theoreme
\"Un
Problems, Second Edition.
Stability
Berlin.
Heidelberg,
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,
l'instabilite,\"
2, 529-534. and
P.J.
CHANNEL,
systems,\"
C.
SCOVEL,
of Hamiltonian
integration
\"Symplectic
[1990].
231-259.
3,
Nonlinearity,
curves of discontinuous quasiperiodic type on a Soc., 44. J.H. [1982]. \"On general of quadratic C. and TIAN, CHICONE, properties sysAmer. Math. tems,\" Monthly, 89, 167-179. and HALE, J.K. [1982]. Methods S.N. CHOW, of Bifurcation Theory. SpringerNew York, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin. Verlag: J. [1975]. \"Applications of generic S.N., HALE, J., and MALLET-PARET, CHOW, Rat. Mech. Anal., 59, 159-188. bifurcations, I,\" Arch. of generic bifurcations, II,\" Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 62, \"Applications [1976].
T. [1938]. \"Analytic
CHERRY,
Math.
London
Proc.
torus,\"
209-236.
of bifurcation to homo clinic
\"An example
[1980].
orbits,\"
37, 351-
J. Diff. Eqns.,
373.
S.N.
CHOW,
J.
tion,\" CHURCHILL,
J.
and MALLET-PARET,
Diff. Eqns., 26, 112-159. and ROD, D.L. R.C. for complex
theorem
integrability
[1977].
\"Integral
[1988]. \"Geometrical Hamiltonian
and bifurca-
averaging
J.
Diff.
Eqns.,
114. Equations.
COLLET,
P.
C.
Math.
Soc.:
and
New
N. [1955]. New York.
Theory
of
Ordinary
Differential
on the Interval as a [1980]. Iterated Maps Massachusetts. Isolated Invariant Sets and the Morse Index, CBMS 38. Amer.
J.-P.
Island.
C. [1972].
DeBOOR,
McGraw-Hill:
Boston,
Rhode
Providence, and
York,
ECKMANN, Birkhauser:
[1978].
CONTE, S.D. Edition.
LEVINSON,
McGraw-Hill:
System.
Dynamical CONLEY,
and
E.
CODDINGTON,
non76, 91-
of Ziglin's
aspects
systems,\"
New
York,
New
Elementary Numerical
Analysis,
Second
York.
and Asymptotic Behavior of Differential W.A. [1965]. COPPEL, Stability tions. Heath Mathematical Monographs. Commun. Math. J .H. [1979]. \"On the Henon transformation,\" CURRY,
Equa-
Phys., 68,
129-140.
CUSHMAN, pOSe
Math.,
R. [1974]. \"The 14, 323-342.)))
momentum
mapping
of the
harmonic
oscillator,\" Sym-
547)
548
References)
of the
\"Geometry
[1983].
CWI Newslett.,
energy-momentum
of the
mapping
pendulum,\"
spherical
1, 4-18.
Brill: Leiden. U. [1954]. The Struggle for Existence. D'ANCONA, A. [1981]. \"Bifurcation results for a class of de MOTTONI, P. and SCHIAFFINO, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 3, 11-20. periodic quasi linear parabolic equations,\" A. [1932]. differentielles a la \"Sur les courbes definies DENJOY, par les equations surface du tore,\" Pures Appl., 17, 333-375. J. Math. Basic Circuit C. and KUH, E. [1969]. DESOER, Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York, New
York.
homo clinic orbits in an integrable DEVANEY, R.L. [1978]. \"Transversal system,\" Am. J. Math., 100, 631-642. \"A piecewise linear model for the zones of instability of an area-preserving [1984]. lOD, 387-393. map,\" Physica Dynamical Systems. Benjamin/Cummings: [1986]. An Introduction to Chaotic Menlo Park, California, Massachusetts. Reading, Nouvelles trajectoires DIENER, M. and REEB, G. [1986]. \"Champs polynomiaux: Bull. Soc. Math. Belgique, 38, 131-150. remarquables,\" E. [1986]. AUTO: Problems DOEDEL, Software for Continuation and Bifurcation in Ordinary Differential Equations. CIT Press: California. Pasadena, M. [1989]. \"Numerical computation of heteroclinic DOEDEL, E. and FRIEDMAN, J. Compo Appl. Math., 25, 1-16. orbits,\" G. [1918]. Erzwungene DUFFING, Schwingungen bei Veriinderlicher Eigenfrequenz.
Braunschweig.
DULAC, M.H. [1923].
les cycles
\"Sur
Bull.
limites,\"
Soc. Math.
France, 51,
45-188.
J.-P. J., MARTINET, J., MOUSSU, R., and RAMIS, [1987]. \"NonAcad. Sci. Paris, Tom 304, Series accumulation des cycles-limites,\" C.R. I, 13, p. 375, and 14, p. 431. of chaos and strange J.-P. and RUELLE, D. [1985]. \"Ergodic ECKMANN, theory Modern 617-656. Rev. attractors,\" Phys., 57, do multistep methods approxO. [1988].\"What T. and NEVANLINNA, EIROLA, Numer. 53, 559-569. imate?,\" Math., solu\"Double EVANS, J.W., FENICHEL, N., and FEROE, J.A. [1982]. impulse tions in nerve axon equations,\" SIAM J. Appl. Math., 42, 219-234. ECALLE,
M.J.
FEIGENBAUM,
transformations,\" \"Universal
[1980].
FIFE, P.
in Mathematics, berg, Berlin. ematics, FITZHUGH, nerve FRANKE,
[1974].
universality
for
Almost
Vol.
28.
Periodic
a class
of nonlinear
Los
Alamos
periodic
Sci., 1, 4-27. Systems, New
York,
Lecture Heidel-
Differential Equations, Lecture Notes in MathBerlin. New York, New York, Heidelberg, and physiological states in theoretical models of
Biophys. J., 1, 445-466. SELGRADE, J. [1979]. stable
systems,\"
of Reaction Diffusion New York, Springer-Verlag:
Aspects
Vol. 377. Springer-Verlag: R. [1961]. \"Impulses
membrane,\" J. and
asymptotically
in nonlinear
behavior Mathematical
[1979].
Notes
FINK, A.M.
\"Quantitative
[1978].
J. Stat. Phys., 19, 25-52.
orbits,\"
\"A computer
SIAM J. Math.
method Anal.,
for verification 10,
614-628.)))
of
References
N.K. and SIL'NIKOV, L.P. [1972]. \"On three-dimensional dynamto systems with a structurally unstable homo clinic ical systems close curve, I,\" Mat. Sbornik, 17, 467-485. Ibid. II, 19, 139-156. [1973]. P. and SPARROW, C. [1984]. \"Local and GLENDINNING, global behavior near homo clinic orbits,\" J. Stat. Phys., 35, 645-696. G. and WILKINSON, J. [1976]. \"Ill-conditioned and the GOLUB, eigensystems GAVRILOV,
canonical form,\" SIAM Rev., 18, 578-619. and their SinGUILLEMIN, V. [1973]. Stable Mappings New York, New York, Berlin. gularities. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, M. and SCHAEFFER, and Groups in D.G. GOLUBITSKY, [1985]. Singularities Sciences, 51. Springer-Verlag: Bifurcation Theory, Vol. I, Applied Mathematical New York, New York, Heidelberg, Berlin. D.G. [1988]. Singularities GOLUBITSKY, M., STEWART, I., and SCHAEFFER, and Groups in Bifurcation Mathematical Sciences, 51. Theory, Vol. II, Applied New York, New York, Berlin. SpringerVerlag: Heidelberg, G. [1990]. GORNI, G. and ZAMPIERI, \"Complete integrability for Hamiltonian with a cone potential,\" J. Diff. Eqns., 85, 302-337. systems D. [1959]. of systems of differential GROBMAN, \"Homeomorphisms equations,\" Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 129, 880-881. P. [1983].Nonlinear J. and HOLMES, GUCKENHEIMER, Oscillations, Dynamical 42. Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Berlin. New New York, York, Heidelberg, Springer- Verlag: S. [1980]. Dynamical SysGUCKENHEIMER, J., MOSER, J., and NEWHOUSE, tems. in Mathematics, No.8. Birkhauser: Massachusetts. Boston, Progress
computation
Jordan
of
M. and
GOLUBITSKY,
J.K. [1961]. \"Integral 73, 496-531.
HALE, Math.,
Oscillations
[1963].
in Nonlinear
Systems.
differential
New
McGraw-Hill:
Ann.
systems,\"
New York,
York,
London.
Toronto,
[1977]. Editor,
Studies in
MAA Studies in
Equations,
Differential
Ordinary
Math-
14.
ematics,
Theory of Functional Berlin. York, Heidelberg,
[1977a]. New
of perturbed
manifolds
Equations.
Differential
Second Equations, [1980]. Ordinary Differential Company: Huntington, New York. Theory,\" [1981]. Topics in Dynamic Bifurcation Rhode Island. Math. Soc., Providence,
New York,
Springer-Verlag:
Edition.
Robert E.
Pub-
Krieger
lishing
[1984]. \"Introduction
to
Vol. 1057. Springer-Verlag: HALE, J.K. and LA SALLE, SIAM
dynamic New
NFS-CBMS
bifurcation,\" in Lecture New York, Heidelberg,
Notes
York,
J. [1963].
\"
Differential
equations:
Lectures,
47, Am.
in Mathematics, Berlin.
Linearity
vs.
Non-
Rev., 5, behavior of gradient-like and MASSATT, P. [1982]. \"Asymptotic sysin Dynamical tems,\" Systems II (Eds. Bednarek, A. and Cesari, L.), 85-101. Academic Press: New York, New York, London. orbits C. [1987]. \"Do numerical and GREBOGI, HAMMEL, S.M., YORKE, J.A., true orbits?,\" J. Complexity, of chaotic dynamical processes 3, 136-145.))) represent linearity,\"
HALE,
J.K.
249-272.
549
296
9:
Chapter
is the
local
Near
Equilibria)
d hu
+
[A2X2
d X2)
In an analogous
of the origin.
manifold
stable
local unstable
for the
initial-value
the
manifold
problem)
= Alhu + gl (hu,
g2(h u , X2)]
obtain
we
way,
= o.
hu(O)
X2),
(9.25))
formidable. One rather these differential equations look Admittedly, Or, better yet, one can can, of course, attempt to solve them numerically. of obtain approximate solutions by using also readily expansions Taylor the then and the functions hs or hu near the origin coefficients, equating
as illustrated in the 9.30.
Example
below.)
example
local stable and
Computing
unstable
us
Let
manifolds:
Example 9.28 in light of the scalar differential equations (9.24) and (9.25). In this case, these equations become)
reconsider
dhs
= hs
[-Xl]
+
=
hs(O)
X\037,
(9.26))
0,)
dXl)
-dhu respectively.
Because
be
in power
expanded
2
[X2 +hu
d X2)
]
= -hu,
of the properties series of the hs(Xl) =
hu
(X2)
=
(9.27))
0,)
(9.27),
form)
1
1
2
3 a 3 X 1 +'..,)
+
3!
2a2X1
1
2
b2x2 + 2
hs(Xl) = -lxi 95, 3-22.
Phys.,
recovering
the
tions.