Displaying the Orient: architecture of Islam at nineteenth-century world's fairs 9780520074941


121 59 72MB

English Pages [264] Year 1992

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

Table of contents :
Frontmatter
List of Illustrations (page viii)
Acknowledgments (page xiv)
Introduction (page 1)
1. Muslim Visitors to World's Fairs (page 17)
2. Islamic Quarters in Western Cities (page 51)
3. Search for Identity: Architecture of National Pavilions (page 95)
4. Exposition Fever Carried East (page 139)
5. The Impact (page 153)
Epilogue (page 181)
Notes (page 200)
Selected Bibliography (page 226)
Index (page 235)
Recommend Papers

Displaying the Orient: architecture of Islam at nineteenth-century world's fairs
 9780520074941

  • 0 0 0
  • Like this paper and download? You can publish your own PDF file online for free in a few minutes! Sign Up
File loading please wait...
Citation preview

DISPLAYING THE ORIENT a

COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON MUSLIM SOCIETIES Barbara D. Metcalf, General Editor

1. Islam and the Political Economy of Meaning edited by William R. Roff | 2. Libyan Politics: Tribe and Revolution by John Davis

3. Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and Its Medieval Background by Yohanan Friedmann

4. Shari‘at and Ambiguity in South Asian Islam edited by Katherine P. Ewing

5. Islam, Politics, and Social Movements edited by Edmund Burke, Ill, and Ira M. Lapidus

6. Roots of North Indian Shi‘ism in Iran and Iraq: Religion and State in Awadh, 1722~—1859 by J. R. |. Cole

7. Empire and Islam: Punjab and the Making of Pakistan by David Gilmartin

8. Islam and the Russian Empire: Reform and Revolution in Central Asia by Hélene Carrere d’Encausse

9. Muslim Travellers: Pilgrimage, Migration, and the Religious Imagination edited by Dale F. Eickelman and James Piscatori

10. The Dervish Lodge: Architecture, Art, and Sufism in Ottoman Turkey edited by Raymond Lifchez

11. The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society by Carol Delaney

12. Displaying the Orient: Architecture of Islam at Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs by Zeynep Celik

DISPLAYING THE ORIENT ARCHITECTURE OF ISLAM AT NINETEENTH-CENTURY WORLD'S FAIRS

ZEYNEP CELIK |

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY LOS ANGELES OXFORD

aa

ac °? ——

re University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd.

Oxford, England : © 1992 by The Regents of the University of California

Library of Congress Cataloging-inPublication Data Celik, Zeynep.

Displaying the Orient : architecture of Islam at nineteenth-century world’s fairs / Zeynep Gelik.

p. cm. — (Comparative studies on Muslim societies ; 12)

Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-520-07494-7 (alk. paper)

1. Architecture, Islamic—Europe. 2. Architecture—Europe. 3. Exhibition buildings—Europe—History— 19th century. 4. Architecture, Islamic—United States. 5. Architecture—United States.

6. Exhibition buildings—United States— History— 19th century. 7. Exoticism in

architecture—Europe. 8. Exoticism in architecture— United States. |. Title. 1. Series.

NA957.C44 1992

725’.91—dc20 91-13594 Printed in the United States of America

987654321 The paper used in this publication meets the miminum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. @9)

TO MY PARENTS |

CONTENTS

List of Illustrations viii Acknowledgments xiv

Introduction 1

1. Muslim Visitors to World's Fairs 17 2. Islamic Quarters in Western Cities 51 3. Search for Identity: Architecture of National Pavilions 95

4. Exposition Fever Carried East 139

5. The Impact 153

Epilogue 181

Notes | 200 Selected Bibliography 226

Index 235

ILLUSTRATION S

I. A parade by Arabs in the Trocadéro Park, Paris, 1900 19 2. Filigree artisans in the Egyptian bazaar, Paris, 1867 20

3. Turkish café, Paris, 1867 21 4. Ironsmith from Kabyle, Paris, 1889 21 S. Tunisian souk in the Trocadéro Park, Paris, 1900 22 6. ‘“Bedouins in Their Encampment,” Chicago, 1893 23 7. Whirling dervish on the Rue du Caire, Paris, 1889 23 8. Alma Aicha’s dance in the Egyptian café of the Rue du Caire, Paris, 1889 25 9. Sudanese musicians and dancer in the Egyptian café of the Rue du Caire, Paris, 1889 26 10. A dance in the theater of Cairo Street, Chicago, 1893 27

Il. Cartoon from World’s Fair Puck, Chicago, 1893 28 I2. Dance of the narghile, Paris, 1900 31 13. Dance of the chair, Paris, 1900 31 14. Reception of Isma‘il Pasha by Empress Eugénie at the Tuileries, Paris, 1867 33 15. Sultan Abdiilaziz’s visit to Napoleon III in the Elysée Palace,

Paris, 1867 34 16. Osman Hamdi, Discussion in Front of a Mosque Door, c. 1900 41

17. Turkish costumes: women and schoolboy 43 18. Plan of Exposition universelle, Paris, 1867 $3

19. Old Vienna, Chicago, 1893 54 20. Rue des Vieilles-Ecoles, Paris, 1900 $5 21. Vieux Paris, Quai de Billy, Paris, 1900 = 55 vill

22. Suez pavilion, Paris, 1867 548 23. Interior of the Suez pavilion, showing the models of the canal area, Paris, 1867 $9 24. The Turkish quarter, with Pavillon du Bosphore, mosque, fountain, and bath, Paris, 1867 60 25. Gateway to the Turkish quarter, Paris, 1867 61 26. Tunisian palace, Moroccan tent, and Moroccan stables, Paris, 1867 62 27. The Ottoman section, with main exhibition hall and the Egyptian buildings, Vienna, 1873 64

28. Sultan’s Treasury, Vienna, 1873 66 29. Turkish café, Vienna, 1873 66 30. Turkish bazaar, Vienna, 1873 66 31. Egyptian section, Vienna, 1873 67 32. Jacques Drévet’s drawing of the Tunisian, Moroccan, Siamese, Persian, and Annam pavilions, Paris, 1878 68

33. An Oriental bazaar in the Trocadéro Park, Paris, 1878 69 34. View of the Trocadéro, with the Islamic quarter, Paris, 1878 70

35. Arab house, Paris, 1889 73 36. Sudanese house, Paris, 1889 74 237. Rue du Caire, Paris, 1889 76 38. Donkey drivers on the Rue du Caire, Paris, 1889 77 39. Esplanade des Invalides, site plan, Paris, 1889 78 40. Gate of the Tunisian souk on the Esplanade des Invalides, Paris,

1889 79 ILLUSTRATIONS ix

Al. Markets on the Esplanade des Invalides, Paris, 1889 79 42. Aerial view of the Chicago exposition, 1893 80 43. View of the Midway from the Ferris wheel, Chicago, 1893 81 44. Entrance to the Egyptian quarter, Chicago, 1893 82

4S. Cairo Street, Chicago, 1893 82 46. Cairo Street, Chicago, 1893 84 47. Entrance to the Street of Constantinople, Chicago, 1893 86 48. Damascus Palace, Chicago, 1893 87 49. “Camp of Damascus colony,’’ Chicago, 1893 88

50. Rue des Nations, Paris, 1900 89 Si. View toward the Trocadéro Palace, with the Iéna Bridge, the Algerian palace, and the Tunisian palace, Paris, 1900 90 §2. View of the Trocadéro Park, with the Algerian palace, Tunisian palace, and Trocadéro Palace, Paris, 1900 91

53. View toward the Eiffel Tower from the Trocadéro Park, with the Tunisian palace and the Algerian palace, Paris, 1900 91

$4. Rue d’Alger, Paris, 1900 92 55. Parvillée’s drawing of the Mausoleum of Mehmed I 97 56. Parvillée, plan of the mosque, Paris, 1867 98 57. Parvillée, facade of the mosque, Paris, 1867 99 58. Parvillée, section through the mosque, Paris, 1867 100 59. Interior view of the mosque, Paris, 1867 IoI 60. Parvillée, plan of the Pavillon du Bosphore, Paris, 1867 102 61. Parvillée, facade of the Pavillon du Bosphore, Paris, 1867 102 62. Parvillée, section through the Pavillon du Bosphore, Paris, 1867 103 63. Interior of the Pavillon du Bosphore, Paris, 1867 104 64. Parvillée, plan of the bath, Paris, 1867 105 65. Parvillée, facade of the bath, Paris, 1867 105

66. Ottoman pavilion, Vienna, 1873 106 67. Pavilion of Turkish Tobacco, Paris, 1889 107

68. Ottoman pavilion, Chicago, 1893 108 , x ILLUSTRATIONS

69. Ottoman pavilion, Paris, 1900 109 70. Palace of the khedive, Paris, 1867 112 71. Drévet, plan of the okel, Paris, 1867 113 72. Drévet, section through the okel, Paris, 1867 113 73. View of the okel, Paris, 1867 113 74. Egyptian temple, Paris, 1867 114 75. Interior of the Egyptian temple, Paris, 1867 115 76. Egyptian temple, Paris, 1878 117 77. Egyptian palace, Paris, 1900 =118 78. Persian pavilion, Vienna, 1873 120 79. Persian pavilion, Paris, 1878 121 80. Persian pavilion, Paris, 1900 121 SI. Tunisian Palace of the Bey, section, Paris, 1867 124 82. Courtyard of the Tunisian palace, Paris, 1867 125 83. Algerian displays of raw materials, Paris, 1867 126 84. Algerian palace, Paris, 1878 126 85. Courtyard of the Algerian palace, 1878 127 86. The portal of al-Kebir mosque, Paris, 1878 128 87. Courtyard of the Algerian palace, Paris, 1889 129 88. Courtyard of the Algerian palace, Paris, 1900 130 89. Tunisian palace, Paris, 1889 131 go. Tunisian palace, Paris, 1900 132 QI. Interior of the Tunisian palace, the archaeological section,

Paris, 1900 133 ,

Q2. Front facade of the main hall, Ottoman General Exposition, Istanbul, 1863 140 Q3. Back facade of the main hall, Ottoman General Exposition,

| Istanbul, 1863 141 Q4. D’Aronco, pavilion for the Istanbul Agricultural and Industrial Exposition, Istanbul, 1894 144 QS. D’Aronco, British pavilion, Istanbul, 1894 145

96. Tents of local people, Ismailiyya, 1869 148

ILLUSTRATIONS xi

97. Pavilion for the khedive and his guests, Ismailiyya, 1869 149 98. Pavilion for the Muslim ulama and pavilion for the representatives

of the Catholic church, Ismailiyya, 1869 150 | 99. Detail drawing from Usul-u mimari-i Osmani 155 100. Detail drawing from Usul-u mimari-i Osmani 155 IOI. Gate of the Ministry of Defense (now Istanbul University) 158 102. Gate of the military barracks in Taksim, Istanbul 159 103. Terminal of the Orient Express, Istanbul 160 104. Public Debt Administration Building, Istanbul 161 10S. Public Debt Administration Building, Istanbul 161 106. Entrance to Khayri Bey Palace, Cairo 162

107. Theater, Algiers 163 108. Central Post Office, Algiers 164 109. Owen Jones, interior of the Crystal Palace, London, 1851 166 110. Furness, Brazilian pavilion, Philadelphia, 1876 167 IIT. Furness, Rodef Shalom synagogue, Philadelphia 169 112. Furness, Pennsylvania Academy of Arts, Philadelphia 169 113. Davioud and Bourdais, Trocadéro Palace, back facade, Paris, 1878 I7I1 II4. Adler and Sullivan, Transportation Building, Chicago, 1893 172 IIS. Adler and Sullivan, Transportation Building, the Golden Gateway, Chicago, 1893-173 116. Hénard, Palace of Electricity, Palace of Illusions, Paris, 1900 177

117. Tunisian quarter, Paris, 1931 182 118. Tunisian quarter, entrance to the souks, Paris, 1931 183 119. Museum of the Colonies, Paris, 1931 184 120. Bas-reliefs depicting North Africa, Museum of the Colonies, Paris, 1931 186 121. Sedat Hakki Eldem, Turkish pavilion, New York, 1939 187 122. Moroccan pavilion, Montreal, 1967 188 123. Casablanca, Nouvelle Ville Indigéne, aerial view 191

xil ILLUSTRATIONS

124. Casablanca, Nouvelle Ville Indigéne, street 192

125. Fathy, New Gourna, street 193 126. Sogukcesme Street, Istanbul 195 127. ‘““Kadine aux mousselines” 197

128. “Odalisque aux bijoux” 198

ILLUSTRATIONS xill

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The research for this book was carried out mainly in the Avery Library of Columbia University, the Cooper-Hewitt Library, and the Bibliothéque Nationale. I am grateful to the directors and stafts of these institutions and to the American Research Institute in Turkey, which provided financial support in the early phases. Among my friends and colleagues who helped me in innumerable ways, my special thanks go to Philippe Aigrain, Tosun Aricanli, Tulay Artan, Charles and Christine Burroughs, Suzanne Chun, Ahmet Evin, Mehmet Geng, Mireille Grubert, Richard Ingersoll, Boyd Johnson, Ned Kaufman, Timothy Mitchell, Gilru Necipoglu-Kafadar, Ilber Ortayli, Mary Woods, and Ayse Yonder. To Leila Kinney I owe my greatest intellectual debt: her challenge led me to investigate new avenues, and our collaboration on a related aspect of the world’s fairs truly broadened my vision. Spiro Kostof pursued his interest in my new ventures and inspired me in many ways. My parents, Edip and Nevin Celik; my brother and sister-in-law, Ibrahim and Sylvie Celik; and my mother-in-law, Frances Rome, maintained a genuine enthusiasm for the project. I thank them for their vital long-distance support. Iam greatly indebted to my hard-working assistants over the past few years: to Cheryl McQueen, Susan Miller, Kirsten Abrahamson, Ned Lager, and Jeff Gelles for the long hours they spent in the Avery Library; to Peter Tolkin for the care with which he photographed illustrations from books and periodicals, and to Tayeb El-Hibri for his revisions of Arabic terms. My editors at the University of California Press, Lynne Withey, Jeanne Sugiyama, and Stephanie Fay, have been invaluable. Lynne Withey’s long-standing interest and belief in the project have been leading forces behind its completion. My son, Ali Winston, did a lot of growing up while I researched and wrote this book. I know it was not fun for him to have a preoccupied mother, and I cannot thank him enough for being such a good sport at such a young age. As

XIV

always, the greatest support came from my husband, Perry Winston, who read my drafts, gave me his intelligent feedback, lent me his keen eye in selecting the visual material, and, most important, believed in my work.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XV

This immense exposition recapitulates the entire

world. ... Dreamers of travels, those who are attached by the short chain of their jobs and who

| dream of excursions on the banks of the Nile or the Bosphorus... now have no reason to complain. If they cannot go to the Orient, the Orient has come to them. L‘illustration, 20 July 1867

INTRODUCTION

The second half of the nineteenth century was the time of universal expositions S| in the Western world. Beginning in 1851 in London, the exhibitions, held in many cities of Europe and North America, became, in the words of the historian Eric Hobsbawm, “great new rituals of self-congratulation,” celebrating economic and industrial triumphs. These “new rituals” were directly linked to the dramatic transformation of the economic order. During the first half of the century, industrialization had developed more rapidly than the market for industrial products. With the advancement of modern communication systems, however, the capitalist economy grew to encompass the globe. ' Imperialism and colonialism played crucial roles in this growth, redefining the global power structure and stimulating widespread interest in the nonWestern world—now part of the universal economy. Aside from offering a market and rich sources of raw materials, the non-Western world also provided a supply of labor crucial to the new economic order. The advance of Western capitalism thus led to a much smaller world, one that was unified, if not equal. Simultaneously, the desire to maintain economic and political dominance called for better knowledge of subaltern peoples. While the Western world exported its industrial revolution to the rest of the globe, it also began to import information about other cultures. Universal expositions represented this “single expanded world” in a microcosm, celebrating the products of industry and technological progress and displaying the entire human experience. Other cultures were brought piecemeal to European and American cities and exhibited as artifacts in pavilions that were themselves summaries of cultures. The experiential qualities of architecture—personal, intimate, and accessible to all—made it possible for exhibition buildings to offer a quick and seemingly realistic impression of the culture and society represented.’ As early as the Great Exhibition of 1851 in London, replicas of parts of well-

1

known buildings (such as the Alhambra) were displayed inside the main struc-

ture, the Crystal Palace; separate pavilions for different nations outside the main exhibition hall were first built for the Paris Universal Exposition of 1867. By gathering architectural pieces from all over the world, the fair grounds in-

troduced the notion of an imaginary journey and created a new type of tourism, en place. Architectural displays became indispensable at every fair, setting the precedent for the “period room” and the “outdoor architectural museum.’’® The architectural representation of cultures at the world’s fairs was double-

sided, making a claim to scientific authority and accuracy while nourishing fantasy and illusion.* The architectural critic Montgomery Schuyler argued on the occasion of the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago that the buildings erected for the fairs belonged to a “festal’’ world and formed the “stage-setting for an unexampled spectacle.” This was, he claimed, a world of dreams, and “in the world of dreams, illusion is all that we require.’’® In accord with the notion of the fair as a microcosm and an imaginary journey around the world, foreign and especially non-Western societies were often represented in phantasmagoric images, themselves determined by Western legacies.° Even when the architecture purportedly demonstrated “scientific principles” (for example, the Ottoman pavilions in the 1867 Universal Exposition in Paris), it was received as a dreamlike environment—the setting for fairy tales—because of preconceptions about other cultures that were well established by the nineteenth century. As Walter Benjamin remarked, “Tactile appropriation is accomplished not so much by attention as by habit. As regards architecture, habit determines to a large extent even optical reception.””’ This book examines the representation of Islamic cultures at the world’s fairs of the nineteenth century, with a focus on architecture. The exposition build-

ings reflect sociopolitical and cultural trends crucial to an understanding of nineteenth-century transformations both in the West and in the world of Islam. For example, the placement of pavilions on the exhibition grounds revealed the world order as mapped by Western powers. The architectural styles of these pavilions embodied the colonizers’ concept of Islamic culture as well as the struggle of certain Muslim nations to define a contemporary image, integrating historical heritage with modernization. How Westerners received these pavilions and how Western architects reinterpreted Islamic stylistic traditions, to-

2 INTRODUCTION

gether with the impact such experiments made in urban centers like Istanbul and Cairo, shed light on the dominant attitudes in cross-cultural exchanges. There are several reasons for choosing to study the representation of Islamic over that of other non-Western cultures. First, the world of Islam had been in contact and often in conflict with Europe over a period of thirteen centuries. Cultural and religious differences culminated in adversarial positions: Islam had come to mean the binary opposite of Europe.” Looking at this adversarial relation in the world’s fairs will enable a better understanding of an inherent contradiction: while claiming to be platforms for peaceful cultural communication, in reality the expositions displayed the entire nineteenth-century world according to a stratified power relationship. Furthermore, this choice allows for a more complex reading of the homogenized “Islamic” culture: because some Islamic nations were independent powers while others were colonies during this period, the architectural representation of Islam can be viewed from different perspectives. Second, the issue of cultural self-definition for many Muslim societies during the nineteenth century is particularly interesting due to their struggle to balance modernization imported from the West with local values and forms. The struggle extends to the present day, and “modernity and change” are still debated fervently in all “Third World” countries.’ To analyze the controversy in its original terms, simplified and crystallized in the expositions, helps us to locate it historically. Third, because the investigation of non-Western perspectives reveals ‘“‘other ways that issues were perceived and evaluated, it results in a more complex picture of a nineteenth-century world in which the West is not the only actor. Fourth, and finally, examining the exchanges between Islam and the West acknowledges the existence of communication, discussion, and mutual recognition among these unequal partners, helping to refute the “silent” and “frozen” status given to Islam in Western discourse." My goal is not to survey the nineteenth-century expositions but to focus on those where the architectural representation of Islam was significant.'' The expositions discussed at some length are the Expositions universelles held in Paris in 1867, 1878, 1889, and 1900; the 1873 Weltausstellung in Vienna, and the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago. Each exhibition is associated

INTRODUCTION 3

with specific architectural symbols, themselves often considered tours de force in nineteenth-century architectural history. The 1867 Universal Exposition is best remembered for its elliptical main hall, representing the globe, which was designed by Frédéric Le Play according to Saint-Simonian principles of universalism (see Fig. 18). The hybrid-style Trocadéro Palace, its central dome framed by two minaret-like towers, was the much-discussed hallmark of the 1878 exposition (see Fig. 34). Although this building was demolished in 1935, the new Trocadéro Palace erected on the site followed the outline of the original, engraving the mark of the 1878 fair on the Parisian topography. The centennial of the French Revolution, celebrated by the 1889 exposition, endowed Paris with its most renowned monument: the Eiffel Tower; the immense Galerie des Machines (demolished in 1910) boldly applied technological innovations to architecture. The 1900 exposition gave Paris two permanent monuments:

the Grand Palais and the Petit Palais. In Vienna, in 1873, the longitudinal exhibition hall, with its colossal central dome in iron, stood for the age of technology. Finally, the legendary White City of the 1893 World’s Columbian Ex-

position is considered the beginning of the City Beautiful movement. The dis- , cussion of two other expositions in this study, the 1851 Great Exhibition in London and the 1876 Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, relates Islamic influences to the work of two important architects, Owen Jones and Frank Furness.

At the outset, certain themes need clarification. Cross-cultural topics involve confronting the vocabulary of European scholarship that reaffirms false polarities. The positing of a dichotomy between non-Western (or Eastern, or Oriental) and Western (or Occidental) produces culturally meaningless entities like “Islamic civilization” or “Western civilization.” I believe that introducing a cross-cultural dialogue disrupts this polar system and questions the validity of fixing cultural boundaries. Therefore, when I use these inevitable terms, my

intention is to question their validity, not to divide the world into opposing and homogeneous compartments. The world’s fairs of the nineteenth century have been analyzed from various viewpoints that complement one another and reiterate the ideological import of the expositions. Contributions by scholars in the social sciences and human-

ities suggest both the vast potential of the topic and the usefulness of interdisciplinary research. Among recent publications, those of historians and

4 INTRODUCTION

anthropologists stand out. Historians have focused on the materialism and consumerism of the fairs, have linked the fairs to the development of capitalism and imperialism (Greenhalgh, 1988; Rydell, 1984) as well as to political ideology and artistic expression (Silverman, 1977, 1989), and have discussed cultural representations as microcosmic spectacles (Mitchell, 1988). Art historians have looked at the role the exhibitions played in the art world (Mainardi, 1987; Gilmore-Holt, 1988). Anthropologists and ethnographers have analyzed the impact of their disciplines on the organization of the fairs (Benedict, 1983; Lep-

run, 1986) and have connected the notion of consumerism to the selling of ideas at the fairs (Benedict, 1983). Tying all these approaches together is the theme of the expositions as a neat ordering of the world according to classes, types, and hierarchies—a system inherited from the Enlightenment. For architectural historians, the expositions provided laboratories for new architectural forms and compositions; indeed, no architectural account of the late nineteenth century would exclude the Eiffel Tower and the Galerie des Machines, embodiments of the new aesthetics of iron. To them the fairs also reflected changing trends in architecture. For example, the transition in stylistic expression from the Eiffel Tower and the Galerie des Machines to the neorococo Grand Palais and Petit Palais of the 1900 Paris Universal Exposition is often presented as key evidence of a return to classicism. In addition, the involvement of many prominent architects in these grand events helped to bring the expositions to the forefront of architectural history. Expositions, however, have rarely been studied in their entirety; instead, architectural historians have

discussed the buildings in isolation or have looked at them in their immediate : environments. The theme of the ordered world of the expositions, analyzed by historians and anthropologists, did not extend to the study of their architecture. Neither were the non-Western pavilions considered seriously until Sylviane Leprun’s recent study, Le Thédtre des colonies (1986), which examines the displays of the French colonies in the expositions from 1855 to 1937.

Nineteenth-Century Background

The period covered in this study, 1867-1900, witnessed turbulent transformations in both the political and the cultural lives of the Islamic nations discussed

here. Although confrontation with European powers underlay the changes

INTRODUCTION 5

everywhere, the differences in historical conditions, political structures, economic resources, and geographical locations led to different results, which were also affected by the struggles between European nations themselves. The historical outline that follows is intended to remind readers of the key dates and events as well as the contextual differences. '’

During the second half of the nineteenth century, the Ottoman Empire, once a major Mediterranean power that included the territories discussed here—Egypt, Algeria, and Tunisia—was on the verge of disintegration, no longer able to defend itself against European military incursions. Among the crises the empire had faced were the Crimean War of 1854-56 and the revolt of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1876. In 1877, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Romania obtained their independence; in 1882, Britain occupied Egypt, an independent governance of the Ottoman Empire. As Ira Lapidus argues, only the rivalries between European powers delayed the partition of the empire during the last decades of the century. In effect, the Foreign Debt Administration, an organization formed in 1881 by the Western nations that had made huge loans to the Ottoman government, ruled the empire. The Ottoman government, attempting to rejuvenate the Empire and to confront European advances on its own terms, had undertaken modernization programs as early as the last decade of the eighteenth century. Technical, administrative, legal, and educational reforms based on European models were pursued during the nineteenth century, culminating in the declaration of the Turkish republic in 1923. A crucial debate—as reflected in Young Ottoman thought in the 1860s—was how to balance European norms and forms and Ot-

toman traditions. |

The sultans who guided the Ottoman participation in universal expositions were Abdiilaziz (1861-76) and Abdtilhamid II (1876—1909). Whereas Abdilaziz enthusiastically supported Westernizing reforms, Abdulhamid’s reign was characterized by a return to Islamic ideals on the one hand and a continuation of change and reform on the other. Under Abditilaziz an industrial exhibition

was organized in Istanbul in 1863, and major Ottoman displays were assembled in Paris in 1867 (Abdtilaziz himself visited this exposition) and in Vienna in 1873. During the thirty-two-year-long reign of AbdtiwIhamid II, the Ot-

toman Empire participated in the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago and the 1900 Universal Exposition in Paris; ambitious plans to hold a

6 INTRODUCTION

similar event in Istanbul in 1894 fell apart because of financial problems resulting from a major earthquake that heavily damaged the city.

Although under Ottoman suzerainty since 1517, Egypt acquired a semiautonomous status in 1805, when Muhammad ‘Ali was appointed governor; this status lasted until 1882, the date of the British occupation. Muhammad ‘Ali initiated a series of military, economic, and administrative reforms, relying on the expertise of French and Italian advisers. These reforms were followed by legal and educational transformations and the development of infrastructure (the construction of railroads, the Suez Canal, cities, etc.) under Isma‘il Pasha (1863-79), paralleling the changes promoted by the Ottoman rulers in Istanbul. In 1867, the Ottoman sultan conferred on Isma‘il Pasha the title of khedive, giving him a special position in the empire and allowing him to sign independent technical and economic agreements with foreign powers.'’ Using this capacity, Isma‘il Pasha appealed to European leaders for large loans to finance his projects, and like the Ottoman government, he soon lost control over finances. In 1875, a debt administration under British-French control was established, and in 1882 the British occupied Egypt in the name of the bondholders. Egypt under Isma‘il Pasha built an extensive compound for the Parisian exposition of 1867, which Isma‘il Pasha, like Abdtilaziz, visited. Egyptian pavilions appeared again in Vienna in 1873 and in Paris in 1878, but finances considerably restricted the lavishness of the displays. When the country was appended to the British Empire in 1882, private enterprise undertook the design and execution of the pavilions at the universal expositions.

Algeria, within the Ottoman imperial boundaries since 1529, had maintained its territorial identity and was ruled by a small group of Ottoman miulitary officials until 1830, when the French occupied Algiers. From 1830 to 1890, the French gradually took control of the entire country, defeating a series of regional resistance movements. The first uprising, headed by ‘Abd al-Qadir, lasted from 1832 to 1841 in western Algeria. Sporadic revolts followed, culminating in the massive but unsuccessful revolt in 1870-71, led by a tribal chief, al-Mugrani. Following the defeat of al-Mugqrani, Algeria was incorporated into France and its administration was reorganized into three departments. Nevertheless, a civil governor-general maintained his authority over the entire country. Conflicts between the Algerians and the French did not affect France’s pre-

INTRODUCTION 7

sentation of Algeria in the universal expositions as one of its most consolidated colonies. Algeria was always given a prominent location and an elaborate pal-

ace whose displays depicted a rich country, well integrated into the empire, whose culture enriched the dominating culture. The French presented the Algerian pavilions in Islamic styles even when in Algeria this heritage was being oppressed. Tunisia, captured by the Ottomans in 1574 and made a province of the em-

pire, maintained a semi-autonomous political structure like that of Egypt through most of the nineteenth century. Sharing the problems of the Ottoman

Empire and Egypt in the face of the growing economic might of Europe, Tunisia similarly attempted a series of Westernizing reforms. Ahmad Bey (1837-55) and Khayr al-Din (1873-77) are particularly notable for their modernization efforts. Ahmad Bey, who was deeply influenced by Muhammad ‘Ali of Egypt and whose ideal was Napoleon, began his reign by creating a new army, followed by an industrialization program to help equip the military. Khayr al-Din pursued the reforms begun under Ahmad Bey in administration, finance, education, and urbanism." French involvement in Tunisian affairs increased as Tunisia modernized. This is perhaps best illustrated by the current bey Muhammad al-Sadiq’s submission of the Tunisian constitution to Napoleon III for his approval in 1860.'° Using border disputes as a pretext, the French occupied Tunisia in 1881. Tunisia’s displays in the world’s fairs were staged by the independent beys in 1867 and 1878 in Paris and by France in 1889 and 1900 after Tunisia became a colony. The dramatic shift in political structure did not, however, affect the pattern of architectural representation. The colonial officers chose to repeat the Islamic imagery of the earlier expositions; French architects designed the displays, reflecting the model set by the Algerian pavilions. In its historical references this architecture addressed the concern to preserve tradition. Unlike other North African countries, Morocco never became part of the Ottoman Empire. As an independent state, its power was divided between the

, sultans in the urban areas and the tribal and Sufi leaders in the countryside. But Morocco did not escape the fate of other North African countries in the nineteenth century. As European trade increased, Moroccan industries could not compete with those of Europe, and the opening of the Suez Canal and the

| French expansion into West Africa made the main trade routes through Mo-

8 INTRODUCTION

rocco obsolete. To remedy this situation, Sultan Hasan (1873-95) introduced military, administrative, and infrastructural reforms. These proved less successful than in other parts of the Islamic world largely because of the strong opposition of the religious and political elites, who believed the reforms infringed on religious law. The conflict between the sultan and the regional leaders and the resulting loss of central control facilitated French colonization between 1899 and 1912. Morocco’s presence at the world’s fairs reflected its unstable status: architectural scale and ambition were modest, and the pavilions mimicked those of other Muslim nations. Iran’s political status during the second half of the nineteenth century resembled that of the Ottoman Empire: both were sovereign, but each was also increasingly under European control. In the weak centralized regime of the Qajar dynasty that ruled Iran from 1779 to 1925 the religious establishment had a great degree of independent power. European incursions into Iran were military during the first half of the century, carried out by Russia in the north and the British Empire in the east; later, however, the same powers intervened economically. As elsewhere, exposure to Europe stimulated the modernization of the state apparatus as well as the military and the educational system. The reform movement was led by a new group of Westernized intellectuals who believed that only by modernizing could Iran resist foreign control. In spite of these developments, Iran’s cultural contacts with Europe were more restricted than those of other Muslim countries, which were geographically closer to Europe and had a history of continuous contact with the West. Accordingly, Iran’s representation at the world’s fairs did not reach the sumptuous scale of the Ottoman participation, for example. When Iran took part, its

displays summarized the country’s culture, albeit modestly, by architectural | reference to its most glorious building era—the seventeenth century, under the Safavid dynasty.

Search for a Cultural Image

Many scholars, rejecting the definition of culture as the fixed attributes of a particular society, now focus instead on the dynamics through which cultures are “constructed” by those who define them. For example, in 1986 James

INTRODUCTION 9

Clifford argued that cultures do not have a “scientific” objectivity; they are “produced historically.”’'° Several years earlier, Roy Wagner, analyzing the position of the anthropologist vis-a-vis his research topic, claimed that the anthropologist “invented” the culture he studied on the basis of his own culture: “enveloped in his own world of meanings,” he made analogies or “transla-

, tions” from one culture to the other.'’ In the early 1970s, John Berger elaborated a similar point, applying the idea of studying “culture through culture” " to the way we see things: “We never look at one thing; we are always looking at the relation between things and ourselves.” "” Accepting Wagner’s broad definition of culture as a term that “attempts to bring men’s actions and meanings down to the most basic level of significance, to examine them in universal terms in an attempt to understand them,” ” I will survey the dynamic reformulation of Islamic culture by discussing late nineteenth-century Muslim thought in relation to the representations at the world’s

fairs. Even as many Muslim nations accepted European supremacy and attempted to remodel their institutions according to Western precedents, they were also searching for cultural identity under the strong impact of European paradigms. Because Europe represented the technologically advanced, “‘scien-

tific” world, its “record” of another culture carried authority.” It is not surprising, therefore, that the European cultural image of Islam formed an impor-

, tant element, and often the foundation, of the new self-definition. Europe’s own norms and values had determined the image of an “Orient” in response to the European agenda, and the Orient had become the negative image of post-Enlightenment Europe.” In European discourse Islam was repeatedly characterized according to the preoccupations of Europe (or of anywhere

else, for that matter): power, sex, and religion, linked by violence and tyranny.* European and Islamic cultural systems were juxtaposed and described as diametrically opposed to each other in these areas. Islamic countries in turn focused on the same attributes in their self-definitions: when invited to represent themselves through architecture in the universal expositions, they repeatedly depicted the mosque and the sultan or bey’s residence as prototypical. The mosque was the setting for religious practices and the residence displayed the realm of the political ruler, his power, his lifestyle, and, perhaps most intriguingly, his subordination of women.

10 INTRODUCTION

Yet European paradigms were not simplistically appropriated; they were often filtered through a corrective process, which reshaped them according to self-visions and aspirations. Another reference to architectural representations in the world’s fairs may help to explain: the Ottoman pavilions in the 1867 Universal Exposition in Paris highlighted the rationalist principles of composi-

tion in Ottoman monuments rather than their decorative programs—the obsessive focus of European interest. Aside from illustrating the continuous redefinition of cultures, such specific cases suggest that different Islamic societies need to be considered, “‘each within its particular agendas and pace of development, its own formations, its internal coherence and its system of external relations.”’ At the same time, applying a “contrapuntal perspective” to such specific experiences yields a better understanding of their “overlapping and interconnected”’ histories.” World’s fairs were idealized platforms where cultures could be encapsulated

visually—through artifacts and arts but also, more prominently, through architecture. The debates on architectural imagery thus became closely intertwined with redefinitions of local cultures. I will look briefly at the dominant trends among the Muslim intelligentsia in the 1860s, when Islamic nations first participated on a large scale in the world’s fairs, beginning with the 1867 Universal Exposition in Paris. The colonial discourse associated with the cultural

representation of the occupied territories is not included here, however, because its subject was the consolidation of foreign control and its arguments were embedded in the culture of the “mother country,” in this case, France. I will attempt to correlate nineteenth-century thought in the Middle East and North Africa with the architectural imagery of the universal expositions with reference to the writings of three leading intellectuals from three different regions: Ibrahim Sinasi (1826-1871) of Istanbul, Rifa ‘a al-Tahtawi (1801— . 1873) of Cairo, and Khayr al-Din of Tunis (1820/30—1889). All had lived in Paris for extended periods,” and each one had been exposed to French intellectual and political life, which became a key factor in the evolution of his thought. The historian Albert Hourani argues that the Young Ottomans in the 1860s used Islamic ideas to explain and legitimize the modernization of Ottoman institutions along European models by emphasizing the high morality of Islam

and by claiming that progress meant a “return to the true spirit of Islam.” ”

INTRODUCTION 11

Ibrahim Sinasi, the founder of this movement, was one of the champions of Westernization among the Ottoman intelligentsia. Reversing the Islamic concept of moving from faith to reason,” he argued that the “soul. . . was chiefly guided by reason” and that religion was achieved through reason. But reason was not an end in itself for Sinasi; it was a means to civilization, which he described in religious terms. For example, he referred to Mustafa Resit Pasa, a leading reformer, as the “prophet of civilization” (medeniyet resulu), his time as “the time of felicity” (asr-1 saadet), and his physical existence, his body, as a “miracle” (mucize).” Civilization, the religion of the new age, also had its scripture—the book of laws in which its values, such as justice, rights, and ethics, were registered— and its promise of redemption: it would free mankind from oppression, slavery, and ignorance. Sinasi talked about a “‘new man,” a man of the age of reason, characterized more by universal attributes than by national ones. Indeed, Sinasi’s goal was a worldwide civilization whose nations would serve and en-

lighten humankind and therefore contribute to “progress.’’ Ottoman society would form a bridge between Europe and Asia, where “Asia’s wise (old) reason’ (Asya’nin akl-1 piranesi) would meet with “Europe’s young ideas” (Avrupa’nin bikr-i fikri).” The Ottoman intelligentsia derived their concept of a universal civilization

centered in Europe (and, for many, in Paris) from the French social philosopher Saint-Simon and his followers. Many Ottoman displays in the world’s fairs underlined the participation of Ottoman culture in world civilization: the universal qualities of Ottoman architecture were emphasized to show how these might be incorporated into the repertoire of a contemporary architecture;

artistic and industrial products were often presented with a similar intent: to , link the empire to the European community. Al-Tahtawi, one of the most influential figures in the cultural reformation of Egypt under both Muhammad ‘Ali and Isma‘il Pasha (he was directly involved in educational reform and in the translation of major French texts into Arabic), focused at length on a cultural definition of Egypt within a broader framework of world civilizations and history. In an early work, Takhlis al-ibriz fi talkhis Bariz (The refinement of gold—summary of Paris), published in 1834 by order of Muhammad ‘Ali, al-Tahtawi divided humanity hierarchically into savages, barbarians, and the civilized. Like Europeans, many Muslims belonged to the

12 INTRODUCTION

third group, defined as “‘the people of morality, refinement, sedentary life, life in towns and great cities.” If Europeans in this group were more advanced in

science and technology, Muslims had the shari‘a (divine law), the source of wisdom and social order; by studying European achievements, Muslims would

overcome their inequality.” Thus Egypt would become more civilized as a result of frequent contact with Europe—a notion that Muhammad ‘Ali and Isma‘il Pasha fully accepted. Al-Tahtawi’s concept of civilization was broad based, ranging from infrastructure (roads, modern ports, canals, railroads, etc.) to administrative and political institutions to education. Isma‘il Pasha, satisfied with the progress registered in these areas, declared during his visit to Paris in 1867: “For thirty years, the European influence has transformed Egypt;

now... we are civilized.” *! This rapprochement with Europe did not mean a loss of cultural identity, however. On the contrary, the notion of watan (fatherland, patrie), as opposed to the concept of umma (the large body of believers), appeared in political and intellectual discourse around this time, contributing to the Egyptian struggle for autonomy from the Ottoman Empire. Curiously enough, Egypt’s new

rulers were dusting off Napoleon’s goal of returning Egypt to civilization and | endowing it with its own cultural identity by dissociating it from the Ottoman system. For al-Tahtawi, watan was a place with a glorious history, a place he was proud to be associated with. In his concern to create a distinct national history, al-Tahtawi became the first Egyptian historian to embrace Egyptian antiquity as a glorious part of the country’s past, when Egypt was the “mother”

of civilization.” Al-Tahtawi's first volume on the history of Egypt, Anwar Tawfig al-jalil fi akhbar Misr wa tawthig bani Isma‘il (The radiance of the sublime Tawfigq in the history of Egypt and the descendants of Isma‘il), published in 1865, dealt with

the period from the ancient kingdoms to the Arab conquest, reflecting the work of Egyptologists—among them Jean-Francois Champollion and Auguste Mariette, the first considered the father of Egyptology, the latter a main actor in determining Egyptian representations in the universal expositions in 1867 and 1878.* Al-Tahtawi analyzed both the great achievements and serious setbacks of Egypt after the Arab conquest. For example, although the first caliphs brought a renewal of civilization, the Mamluk beys impeded Egypt’s development with

INTRODUCTION 13

their “pagan furor,” their “racial and clanish solidarity,” and their disregard of “progress and civilization’; their defeat by Muhammad ‘Ali finally opened the era of progress.** Nevertheless, Arab culture played a great role in the history of “civilization,” and Islam would continue to define nineteenth-century Egypt, which would be simultaneously Egyptian, Muslim, and modern (hence civilized according to European norms). As we will see in chapters 3 and 4, this tripartite definition informed the architectural representation of Egypt in the 1867 Universal Exposition in Paris, where one pavilion was devoted to Egyptian antiquity, another to the Arab past, and a third to the modern era— clad in an Islamic image. The Tunisian statesman Khayr al-Din’s proposals for progress followed Eu-

ropean models yet were justified and explained by Islam and exemplify the widespread struggle between modernity and tradition among Muslim intelligentsia in the late nineteenth century. Khayr al-Din’s important book, Aqwam al-masalik li-ma‘rifat ahwal al-mamalik (The surest path to knowledge concerning the conditions of countries) was published in Arabic in 1867; only one year

, later a French translation (done under the supervision of the author) appeared in Paris. The book thus addressed two major audiences: Muslim political and religious leaders who opposed changes according to European models and European statesmen who considered Islam an obstacle to progress.” As a statement about the present condition of Muslim countries that explained their history and speculated on their potential, the French edition played a role similar to that of the exposition pavilions abroad. In the introduction to his English translation of The Surest Path, the historian Carl Brown condensed Khayr al-Din’s argument into three points: Europe’s progress was not linked to Christianity, and hence Islam was not a hindrance to advancement; the reforms Khayr al-Din proposed were in accordance with Islam; and institutions and ideas similar to those in nineteenth-century Europe could be seen in Islamic countries in other periods.” The book itself describes European technology and inventions at length, focusing on the knowledge that could be easily grasped and applied; it omits descriptions of wonders or accounts of daily life in Europe.* It is in this context that Khayr al-Din discussed universal expositions as platforms where “whoever invented{ed] something new or concern[ed] himself with any kind of beneficial work” got public attention; such exposure formed

14 INTRODUCTION

‘one of the reasons for [European] progress.” The organization of the expositions into buildings designated for similar sorts of industries and merchandise, the prizes and decorations, and, ultimately, the attendance of kings and other “men of state’? at these events promoted industrial and technological development.” Khayr al-Din believed that by understanding and applying European mechanisms for rewarding individual initiative, the lands of Islam could achieve progress. Khayr al-Din argued that Muslim nations could both accommodate modernization and maintain their cultural identity. Although he did not dwell on cultural issues, he based his plan for Islamic societies on historical continuity. Unlike al-Tahtawi, Khayr al-Din did not envision national cultures and civi-

lizations, nor did he subscribe to the notion of watan. On the contrary, his propositions were never specific to a locale, and his emphasis was always on umma, most likely because of his concern for the integrity of the Ottoman Empire against European expansion.“

The first three chapters of this book cover the Islamic displays at world’s fairs in Europe and America. Chapter 1 discusses the presence of Muslims at the expositions in the ethnographic displays of indigenous peoples, in the official visits of Muslim rulers, and in the visits of individuals. Chapter 2 examines the site plans of the expositions as diagrams of the prevailing power relations and focuses on the grouping of Islamic pavilions. Chapter 3 surveys the main pavilions of Islamic nations, analyzing their stylistic qualities in the broader context of the nineteenth-century search for cultural self-definition. Chapters 4 and 5 trace the impact of the architecture of these Islamic pavilions. Chapter 4 looks at two Ottoman expositions in Istanbul and at the opening of the Suez Canal in Egypt, all influenced by Western expositions. Chapter 5 relates exposition architecture to Islamic architectural theory and practice and discusses the interpretations of Islamic architecture by leading Western architects. Finally, the Epilogue brings the themes of the book to the present day.

INTRODUCTION 15

Now that we are not afraid of Turks, Arabs, and Saracens, the Orient has become for us a sort of

hippodrome where grand performances are

given... . We take the Orient for a theater. Le Figaro, 26 June 1867

, MUSLIM VISITORS TO WORLD'S FAIRS

Muslim visitors to expositions in European and American cities were either | official representatives of Muslim states or independent travelers, some of whom later recorded their observations in print. The official missions included

| heads of state as well as high-ranking government bureaucrats. Whatever their own motives for visiting the expositions, Muslim sovereigns who attended immediately became part of the display, often as the major attraction. Members of exposition commissions also received due attention from the Western press. And the commissions themselves published books about their cultures, documents that illustrate not only the official self-perception but also the perceptions governments hoped to elicit among Westerners. As part of the displays, indigenous people were brought in to represent anthropological “types.”’ This idea may have derived from the French researcher Joseph Marie de Gérando (1772-1842), who, in the belief that humans could be understood in light of methodological observations carried out on “savages,” had proposed to transport such “pure’’ specimens to France. ! Whereas official visitors to the fairs brought their lives and cultures to Europe and America, independent travelers in their reports took the expositions to audiences back home. Exposition fever was widespread, and literature on the fairs included travel accounts, newspaper and magazine articles, novels, and even poetry, all in tones ranging from the didactic to the lyrical.

Displays of Indigenous People

The young disciplines of anthropology and ethnography popularized their methods and publicized their discoveries at the nineteenth-century universal expositions. In a provocative study, Johannes Fabian defines anthropology as ‘a science of other men in another time,” the notion of “another time” signify-

17

ing not a chronological past but the frozen status of certain societies and cultures. Although, as Fabian points out, these “other men are our contemporaries,” they are situated at a temporal and spatial distance.* The displays of non-Western peoples at the nineteenth-century world’s fairs were organized around the anthropologist’s concept of distance. “Natives” were placed in “authentic” settings, dressed in “authentic” costumes, and made to perform “authentic” activities, which seemed to belong to another age. They formed tableaux vivants, spectacles that fixed societies in history.* Mixing entertainment with education, these spectacles painted the world at large in microcosm, with an emphasis on the “‘strangeness” of the unfamiliar (Fig. 1). Describing a procession to be held at the Midway of the World’s Columbian Exposition in 1893, the Chicago Tribune emphasized its theatricality: It will be a unique procession, one which cannot be seen elsewhere, and one which never may be seen here again after the Fair closes. Headed by the United States regulars, there will follow in picturesque array Turks with Far-Away Moses leading them, Bedouins, sedan bearers, Algerians, Soudanese, the grotesque population of the Cairo Street, with its wrestlers, fencers, jugglers, donkey boys, dancing girls, eunuchs, and camel drivers, Swiss guards, Moors and Persians, the little Javanese, South Sea islanders, Amazons, Dahomans, etc. . . . The march of this heterogeneous conglomeration of strange peoples, brilliant in color and picturesque in attire, will be enlivened by music of all kinds. . . . It will be a picture in miniature of the World of the Orient in this newest city of the Occident, and a day’s diversion in the routine of sight-seeing which will be of an agreeable if not exciting character to witness the queer and strange spectacle."

Such spectacles also served the politics of colonialism. The display of both subject peoples and products from foreign possessions made colonialism concrete to those at home and reaffirmed the colonizing society’s “racial superiority,”

manifest in its technical, scientific, and moral development—as the French prime minister Jules Ferry argued in the 1880s.° The inclusion of native populations in the fairs was much discussed at the time. An anonymous article on the Tunisian section in 1889 argued that it was essential to display the colonized people “to give more reality and life to the buildings [erected on the site].”’° Furthermore, without the display of colonial subjects, an exposition would fail

18 MUSLIM VISITORS TO WORLD'S FAIRS

OS = ¢ oR Sy Oe teot©Le2A|=haeGR

Or

| 1 SSrg° Nat a. ee ie eeBUF eeCoe ES SS SESe Seeagspeee Be ey Oe og ae “RY. ae Pay ee 40 eS eee anaes ge SaSR aes ees eee 1RES. SEES RES oer. ee PANY -Se gill . Saee ago ee ee ooSR | PAE ee ae 34 4 aee: oe ob PARE “ae Ae:gheieat: oS Pgs"aes eee pgos: es See... OeeeoS : * ox ae ees |gh pecgS Renee, Con Lae ‘hake LE oat2s a:agegen be sey : Ee es es reoeFoe ee3Se ae vacShy are Po eee ras cee -a PEERS ee Les Se GS SersOy CC Saale pe§ea RR aeeeaSe CR: eeeee “4 es ees OMe wee yh PES § OB op eae Cee 8BeoecoRee. . a ae ce a es, SIEee eePpa OrSiesta a a ieaero on Fee Cg. ag Eee aeaeons Ae, ieeeSE gage. PRTE ee oSr MAAS te18h, Siro BS RBC Be ees x ee PERE aieyaw : ee ap 4 RE uy ekinleSIG ae2aSB geoocs ee .typed iinet Pea ae cot ge eg -ee naisages gi eennae ee ee ies. * ie. egaeeeaeite. ie Pe Se Oe, E WeSore ey 3gk

oka easeseen ae SLE oe the Rhea, Fege rn at cs: oe Aaaa Won EP ¥ Sere Eeae raeataeae aaey oe Pah Po uy8 ger :. Bos WS2agees cBigr pan if Saea ae weil ee aeME : igOE pk ieee at +Sy8S poegst S gine RE geae So PR PS 3 RE gas 2 ug A, BP ALS ale on FS ial ere ¥ PAS BES OSSFE eyBe a Aae aeae EAT eecay Tbe afER EE ain Roos Oe: SE EE S ee 2, & CCE ® ’B 6. x. PREP Poon oe ieS iesel= oe |3 Bae AUP SL eee Poon. Bec,3oroePeseienSeTeaye Ee Ee eeeeeori

a & Lp Bs foSSS ee: oy, Se eee LRy SSS? Se:ie Ceceeen ERS ee a EES es Seeaes food EESpenbst Pome Bg FOSgswe eee@bS SR aoe ™BR, ¥g eo Reece gn> peers SePeoe OF 2: Moe, ee 7. ings eaealeee —_—*-—/Ls ae SRE a Denti. 4 La '% ply ”SR —er. oe site wag eeLS |eeee ssSoS >ete:a|oe. EES £ Ae2wo ete. ok & a5.pod Ban OE ; 3eeEs . ai oi ;wa... foSee kate al . ae.” BF ema 5°_ke foe Seema Uae ae 7 a aN Re ge tm, * ES * wees Fae cee Be Gen eae eS ome RE SILETT es ae ic3. *er his oe “er ae eee ae SRS RRA REI Be Se Beces 2 , mae oeSES PREae oefo 8aE ;et= om i See m Be ° 2% 78 IM PA aS aSe. wee Nay ees ‘eSe. teeog Xow eecA e.aoe & a “ae aeee“a ae af.Sees #3res eas ™ a% Rs Px ae Soe ee Ee eee eedOa RA ,i :ES 2 rs mer 7 Pq Bie # &s ; Og Ss ee S: Bc See oe SS Fes SS oe 2‘ ers, 2‘Ae ce 2 : g 4 fe aeB2aeanorsce(RB. nA Ye | Reents 23 3, eB ie wo. 8 heSeen Re Bes Re “Y er ee .; SEE PER ee $i WEY eae - bess eGKO} as 3 we 3BS = Per Se ae * a&,A.3dae ig,foJ a &aioe rs Be 5te27SA, Pe ae: :Felt 3 RE 3 fog fe aree Soe ek§ee ang Eve 3 $eRH$? : 4FSqt7Re a Be 7 :hed Ka SF ‘ %Seay » 2 oe aesiho 2 Gere SeeARE Bos ty ;

PPLE 3.5FH We Bey se Y eR Saree. & ARR _ Be4cate Bie otend ee ee ca aSs. res BSaes: 48.38 wee ; ifyptSiee® iB “ |,Seabees : ~7,?:AA te owe wae eSfaeteaaa Fi “eR EE & ay ie¥SARs ee pb ges: Rise SS ge aeas SB“recs wre, ERR wc go ae, —— eee tae

eee i ice{ 5ESR. R pre RKwank 4ote - eS * iba SLi Re Sean ancereoea oe TEENSCe ae pag oe acae =e on outso Ears: ne acs x ¥¢ Races coeeepeabtnat. es ag, UE °RE: : coemapuet aed at jeeSao LES gem ). eur ess ee ean eS Be. whic ce a oe4

a eeween, aa a oe +N bee. i poe ae Both g Pree) Ie =< SeteRY Sears =e eS oe leheSer eeeecBENT aS. eae Gio ee er Ne eyae eee fs z wey east we. ee ae Baove gre. Oe CNT ccoicwiecnatiin nine ae ope feCae: Sag Ke gessof Be ee RSS art See SayOEE SkeLY SS 0Sel in TURRET ME ES oe, RARPRS oa eter ReSy Rene a tacit Rint oS RRS oay . . 33 % BeToS RE PAR BaNee i Sots SMD EE ec 2ceee aia Re ae Wi2p, ee ST ESrh BB= Sct vwee 2 ?¥ CC ee Bry, a ge eT faah SS haeaan SS Se Stara ER eoy she Rash, SES! SSPE BS gineS SON ae Ce a ae a “be fee Ly Stee Se Ue te a ng See pI My : ' yo ¢ eect thes Ss aR Se . oN ee, SEAS Lt Secon RR 3, LRP eS RS ROSS RS aEae BURR: ogfe eis .;VE Fes ORR 8rik.RANI eeeNO MES? Cemmemaee ©ecu4 ene Hhak $e Ue cee CIO MN ReBeatsciieBe Cera Met2 ay Bg

at Os ee 7 a FF cite, S Pe SOUS est ee alee + © Same Geet ca ERR aa Ri Mile RR es ae Nc Cet i ER

SUA OURO PORE Or a 3 F4thea lS ge RTSy pe aniinis Siar nana Fe NN TROT Bn ae CS a BR Se oe oe SS RE ini a Sn RUBE EREESSN ROE mol a ToPe: eB ae: . Bt c/a CR oe oS Bat = SR : “a i 8 ES eS BOOS AvsSe CLpe SERN Eeata jaxts ae ane BRO gene nd BEBOR FepereaRe: | eGh GRE BeercsRAN ES . ae Co CRO 4 ns or oon » Se eehee oe ee Se eeecages. S| peSeer. Se ae pit: ce: OeBek eeeser Dio Reena putBan Reet i: & Se Ree ReBaNCS ABe. Saa ee a RS AED REED. i:

een Ee Pees EEN, SEBO. Hee So REN Ry 1 Mae dR ene eeStSeteress Sceeae Rts Gale aeRRR. AP fee, aSarvs, es ie, BF wy a. Ss. ao eS So) 4 Fi : oO OgOe Ags F: :ars. Reese keeBex ,~2BON Be Rs Silt, OM" § 4Begeeerncay, ee SMR Pc CRC 4ve ©. AIR . wotwe tO ageRe : 2fe. Ps ee3Eas ast eeeCRS Rk: &eee ae RSs .SS f Fee ; aseem tt He BisCoat ar: BES eeeeetaal PB Se Se ggee Ro aaae eS ee So ener See aras SRSee ssRx: Bt 3s y 3 . PE DS i: ENS RE3 :oe SEES % es 2 ROR cai ne,ae Sopaseanaess $0 ROME Ss BSR ye. SBR Eaereano, ¥ NORE ROSoeKAS. -eee ° can cs i.%Sya a: * ko SS. FAMERS 32:3

: a Sees Ess oo ; by, : fF Sama ot63 Rs SBRRhee $y Bete eS Si omesaeses | 3 ban aaa 4 Panels Oaero EE Sk? eee 3k Th Ry ake 2Re Mee: : oan eee ; b - Sed sale? et 5 *Seanalll oi SE kOe See co ay or Secs ees aeeae Be onBS Se 7ES See ES Scyg FL Tioo i: Eg : ome 8%, BES, OR RE “e. page Fe ee ifPRL Ph "ailsee Pee oe wag to PE oeieee: aeBee E : SESS [nsSeacFRR e ces. we. ; ees SEL EE og BdSe Seponies srsa es me et RgSe econ ei ge: Se pie a oF Beet ti: ee OO ars z ef i ane 2Seed asueasp ES eer aresWEEee? Te | fPSS fi8 8 Bo feoee B ee a?SRS aySN ee3Bey Bsaebe. see Je Fe ae£5 EP238:ie4peas eae

. SBC EEE REE SNES ESOe SES Re ae FE”45 PEP eooe OPgee SSEBe a Pee he SESS Le $3 REO Segoe 2: {eeues Biss Se: 4esBoa 3 Fs eeae ee4ee 5Abeen ey, 4ge. gee -PAR ee .eewe rscdre 3S Ree we ie SStlOe: e}eg i ee }é : of: eS aes §hg So a Pe §::i Pace” iPeer i SRS rn + ;Se Be ok CE 5c ee es es aeikeseSfh 82 ogee 2Bae $iPe Wee NI Meee Tee fe. sey ie Me ro a ae en Rr a te ‘ SRP Go SE £ eo ae Pico eae a 8 Cs RR mee es ae 5 ge awh END avge ae as : he Tees 4 8 Bo Bobo BRE Bb ree 3) oo i AE ERE | Baad Po? WB cal Se Bs ey is , a irre ee eea‘oe SS. ;. ws AR eee eeeree:iS See Aare i: OP RG,ee Ct& oa a we ngCe BBE aesie SRE ieORE BP BERBER Soh Breas ° ln tee AR Ca gph SOMES IM ied ;;:eS ets, ae Oy, fs ae Eee afFd ow BAe ee p 4ORS Re & Fas Re aos wer: x PRR k BSS : TARO ae; se beSs -— a-ragpasie | CB ocNt ears Pecocer PPh che Ae 2aa Seg RSMig BR ERE 0p t: 2! efBoi *eee " eek om “ES ttSait shewie A es ae aeOBO £4BSE :: co R.. ee er ae€ES: xPees Oe*€fe Tener t } ae (SS om a4~GE. a OO ets Seo aBek paaK EB Bee 1. OF BSB OO? BFee pee aBore aen : ee neg Paes ae. 4|.eg ie" PsaSORES EE PER wee Sa .wee bys. “Ese, |oy b© BA. —— ayi ~—e % ‘," Boa REE Say Bee. $cara QEa eo 2aee pegs aPh oe, renee }Se aes . aeNG 2RON ae ; eee: ewe os SS re et bs er ‘ne ee pe ESE ar es CO 2 _ eae iy “ Ae | yo fe aaRE eOF 2g OS ee font sf;Sos ° NO fiPa‘Se WE Eas antag geARRON Aea Se gs aBE SMe ae yg mag Le | ae oaeeaaya :iE Pea is .oy ee ae:SE i Er is ENS, UR gk lyPEER Resting eB BE ae SS NGG iBm * Se he : GEE ooeee aoe8‘iF €x2” us & :Rakai Pa lig ER. 4 :ae” we! car pe Eos Ne? oe Se :5:aon aSoa ee: J" ok Eos a & exe . a Kee Pe ERT ee ar 3 he SRR 8 Fo Si! [gay Sea 2 ES: a 1 eR .’2aSESE wey & . $ & HE f ag ene Bick ¢ eR P ssd ‘. é , ay Se PO By. ee 4 sth rcs Lu Be oe 1 ROS Re: Sage RNS a & Beer & oR cae RE 3 ee eo EP _ SS OS 4 Wy oe a BES é -% Reet LAS es ai es Be Pg Pe “ a ae : 2 a OE he Be a re Boy & : a # oe is . . & Grd ee ve F aul & 3) Po eg eee ii eee Eg ga iy oe RORj

BY. . |:iege Sg 3aie &2 Si cp oes eote Sy ae”hde iES Re ie ° Re RRS eS ccs aesLe eee ae ae bey etSESE es a Rig bes gs, By otaee afe3ee éeo: &Oe Be” RR #INES 45%, % SR ee PR ee po at +“es aed BP Goat kj‘,KSe Biieas OB ek agg a|| Bee me Me ‘ae *%REE ge RS i.RF: ee od*SE fgON 4;ORE 3és gc vo en 4&8 me ee aeee EE 23g Rete Or pike =toe zeg OO £otf: ary ?Le :fe Hy Faone PSS RSs oth 3gh 2%. |OS gRe m , ,SOUR: eR mS ae © pea S°|Soke, Gos Se eeEe be _ a3 Cas? teei one 3.SS Fb & ee _:&aome BER oh OR See Sete 2ay:‘EES, . Sp. Ep AS 8HiKER Se Hoge aqBog ‘eS % BRR Sang OER SeNe °eee BE BN ; TT. Se See: 4FF oP PiSte RRS ESL eee Be Fee fe. RREasy ONS Ea iaLope ea: CD ay :oP ;: DOR EO os 3Sie f Hen VASE ss Stait & te>oe to? 2Kak gs aces eed cS ans ES SAS $3 GPRS sie o: ges Bs ARATE SR Beh 3 ER OO Fe 20006; & Pesta _ PAE Boe % te Tyke pees 4 #. ie : Sa 2 KS 8 to RRs Sa :F; Bieet annss, ws RSS “gtna eb rae ee cr ‘sigs ae : mr 7 eer caeaged Doe SeaiAROSE. le BP ee2. reaee ane, Meigs oS ” oe) eee2, S eeSie Siw & aia a5 eel ee ee, Beee NE ioe 4 2 eae a ce hoo gO .aa2eeZee: “ie i:: Ping, mR gy ‘seDoody pees be ncaa et Rei Rens nae Oe ee ie. . ES od) OB ge EO:a: ee ig a, %, asiawee ge ge liuBe Ripe ie og SOE anepes SneseaSececa Far ec pi Ee Se. ae ; eR FS ay =.Loe eS Oa a ean ed

an o ee ee OS 2 ag Ee > a ee Pe, ee ee. te SRE tree een Sh

noe Pui s DCRR. gee Mai ies ¢aeOS $3 kee gS eeeRe pe See eee .OES ze 4 eee Bar ee: Seo ea RRR Bec ee aa Ae aes Be[og ~ t age 3 OO. BeSE aeee aPRS 8 aes ees ee 33 ete ee Biase a: a =ogneil a aeRe,apre Biigodga MR -@ Pa: ae 44 EN Zi i ees foSeees SE

ees: RES Pk le aesconinemamiaas ye * A ed ys Beg BS MM ale Be ep‘ Ss se gsnen ens \Boo _ - cer =RC fins ameMA eesaeRO ee ei?cea. eee 5 cia eee eras areheaeag 4Mile oH ER , i é oo ae Re. :oak oles, ‘ EES Cerrar RR EC NCACN age : : “ REL es BOIGEE Pr PER EON ReRS i aeeeED SiR pe See een SN Se eeCR oeSan a ee: : ee wigs Poe — be ta aa Sp eee >‘Se SK PSS ueRSS aE aR aa sao Segoe Meg eee sfSeSees FWSAee aeRee 3k ( es Be ee ay ee RS ee Se Bs See ae See, as ee a ee a | ce ee mei. Ne ecu REGS a a es oe Gir3 2 e BARS Re eee tae Suse ee ee es ok SES tie os Se Sa o ee E 1 8 Bert cae s BS RE ESP BRS! See SESS, aS SER ees oe ange Sea S See Soe oes Sa See Sere 2 ge sieeeaes Ss Sess ot eens oe i BORE 8 Sie 8 Se REE fete ee oe eee ws

ee ee Cee eeBoeoe aReee aeeeCC ee—an of Expositi | eae ate ooee a2 qa &: ae Hh |tLposition unwverOe, San PPR eee 0 higoo ad) SPT Bee eaeeS Ee Lg

pena* te : aORES aeeo fee eeoeqBey : rt: Sones SS Ree eee eee SOUR Ren eas SORT Bo ookeisOS bP BeeReBe ees Ree GES 4 ioe RRS Bee See SERS Re: eT :as ees See Soe Scie oe panne Sa . 3re SRa oo SS:Se Seeae ee BRee Sees Per anne ENeR Se eS epeeSEER ee Soe celtics Sees eesS08 ad IPOS DB ee SerREE rete SR Sere SESree ES OE Reco Re 9BSS Ee SESS Poecnnene ae ot — TESS 5 See Be Bee ee § Biogas ao SOS ean es ee ages (SOE SS EERE out Sok peta Sat RR SESE SS Serge SSeS pe nma Ses & SOE See

A PS RRS OES ON ee ee Se ee ee eee BO Wega = oe gone RigPaie i7 A oe S$ Bee eeFERS aeOER SeeES RS SeGR eee eeeS SS ee See ee SyGER EBAY! ESEee 5, RES ee eesoe RSEee oe8peed ee = eee ey Pee a seve risef 1edfe |Lata. ae,eee ee ae EE RE AS BRO Sere eee ee Bake eer en 2 ars eeeepees: ESS span’ Fe eee Se ae Bae SMR eC Oe Sais. Bee ee oe SNe See ee BaCome Geo ME Re ys Se Sos SeCee SeaSpee ee ee ae eeecso Seer Bee SS@Seed Egg a' 'SES ,”

eee See Nes ee eee ee ee ee Bry eae ks SNS ee ea aS Pee Ea, “teAe34RS RGR SCM ER. RE RKSas See aes Sere eeEARLE ere Somer MBSE EEE Ons Seas SieES Boe ert ae RRSPSL Se Oe ee Renee ae Soe eee aneesy SesSSS Bee PSae$e ROS Sx. RA PeRe Oe Oe aan WERE EE {8istee Sepaaay Noe Se nen oeASAE age es 5, eaten eae Recs 2SG ER Bos SR CR RR Se eeRs ee Fags Sas Seaaeee SSeS Ronen SeBAS Seen Sense Cae Bee RE osRe an Ce ae Pe i 17 ) eS Bo .;% Ss eS: Seoa SASS Bee eee See owe mse SR SESR Pye Nae Mae Sage eeeSENOS oe Regom Pea eeeSeancy see Ses Sea REE coe ee ee -aSsSRiRESSok fa Os oo ye iE88 ees — aoe oe oo Bee os 5S BEC asRE Ege We keSeaera SARC Ee SoS BG Mees eee Uae EE leFromenades SS 1867 : en. ~ 73 Beek es “S a PR1oesceReeee oe aeSeAe aneeoan gn ee age enna de Paris Se eed gh ee eS eS SEES SEE Be. ane Sees eas Se orien ae ae oe Se ee See Piigeemnesaerar eres wecege SE : . eae See oe So eee Ses er PP es eae Po ad ‘ Sew eS RRS co 5 ER ee Se eee ee peyeet Siig iag Meteo ltSESE Bees = PME Sak Oy Ne Y SNES Se aeeo aN Na ee See SEE Se ORONO Sept neces FEMS =2 E Pe oe eeee ee PEST isRS Bo =RES oe Be &Re osraES, oe oe — ¥oS Poe ageter ae co Bie er eee aE! Fd ot REE a Fates ON Re Rete. gee See eae Rae sf cog Rae: asPES BS gee 2 SRRgem ee zay =eSYS OS BERR SeSee|GR. Vs ee ae ra —t hr

Bae OR ee ro A ear oe - ree Pee Ce fee S. Ye eo sor va: . ee§enCe Beheee esbee? 4 CE ee ot=aeRa PERN ae aaes See eeSr, ee—. SeeSee SoG Se Pe PS gees. ae Ra eeeee aeSepees fe Soee aScAS bolle Fe

ee : mee. wo rt rl Of OW see .

Wes aS Bs OR Pe Oe Gee ee eeecs =OE af oe, a.Ve ee See os Se ee SG eehse eae ai Sieeg egg eeSeeSe ee Peds i i Oe oa ah Fe TEN sh Ce BER NSS RENoe go ao Roe SO ONS Se ORD)Ge eos SEES eeNS ay? 3 8i +bee DRGs ae Pee :ee:éBA BOR es Se Se NS See Sa Se an ree B ee ae aOePie :a>.:4yy eG Soe SS — gfER SR Sa Ee eR Gee See poe ae Sere eSieae aS SS & oe Sah RRS aoO SERN SSR eaRee SRS See AEa ee Se Bee ogg ies Pe EO ESoe EeESE SSE SE See Sy, RAR ea Se SRS ORE Sy Ae ee ORE Ce. SRE SR er Re SREY SeOveie . oy ae Ee See Ss Seo WSs aS. es Ss oe =| fo eee oo ~aSee ce £8 Pa eo bo Khe a SsSE Oe Sear « oS Boe Sg TRS a feC58 eee oe ee RO a eeEES SRG rk Cee oeSi“iol& SRSRE TSE SE 2 aa = See RE es: SRR SS SS ae PS BRS Scene Sa ERR RNE REDS nah SRR Se SET SRS enemecees “is soy st RR. Nae a Ee ES 5 OLS RE SSS

Phas SSeS ae Nika I & ts SS Soy RES Se BRS AR Se RR SE NCE SRY OE BERORCER RUN SER ase SSS, SEO NNR Soe 2a FESS PE SS

EOS eS ae is = Zils OEeee PO EERE ESREN SNeeaSe SS SNe Sy ER SOR SRR SS enNS NaSe Soes hee 5es as ee ie 5%) PS3SESS RENEE Ss RRR RREIES SOC Nye: SES Ree ES esAe *Rs aE: Reon ee 227 ONS Seika aeA RS + SRY Rape See PSS Se ee Sea Ps w“ @ % SeeEee eee PES ROSES Seeee ode :*g on chee RR RSE cot ee eee SEE SB ee EES ee re See ae SERS Sa aoyMO My ES: SAS oe ESoeCEE eis Nae eS oe aeSE aee ae SS Wes SO ea aso-Ste ed th 3— 7EeEEE ees oS SeSERS OSS See a.) esoe ,i.giles. SS eee |ceeae ‘LN Se Se ee Pe og cs, Geis” ee Ss Ss ee &. @. et * i Be SS eat ee ce ee er oe “Sa SN RE ao mam _ ee OES oes SRS ee” SC 5 Hh

— is 2 te oo oe We 28° oe Po

OR SR4©. eSx"7Po CatSERS Rs RR SESS OURS ee RS NNSaaS SteeSeee SoA 5aR IEeC, BREE. ”de Serita RS ee ES USS RRS Sd2 B! a ERS SON NS iesOR SESE BSS: SERN SE Soe eae 4, eesuF See a. ey }@. af Ss Ce RRS ERS AAO esTET SS >%=aes e- emiamonn acne cen AM cn MAA CORONAL ee CIS " pe 3og 3wat A nates ee ” .ge *MN TIRANA ION, eeNArany 5 i Ps coupe rnc A fia . ae oe zBee $eemene “Pee eke Lo > aeWreee Miscvieeiin Ro. aosae aCORRES appx eta £8 Be ‘£Nase: -"aioe Meee Beene gaa iRinne tN rare AC 3f ey Be £4 ¥oie Fp Neat nee ere, aD Og oot cael ae we -St. A ean aA Ba canoe awer rn nics 8nse die. ¢ Se San. Sih. 7.$Re ioe 5:4SE z.+ ack iBF *, ce.wget aS:sega aANN an £Aue og st a8 TERSSSUNG ARES. SOR sean: AEN, Fs ae RE ee Retoare. & a” e* os : ae 3 i tote ecens eggs DinoRapnnennr gees poeta BUS, UIE RONAN CS 4 ~ SERN 6 Nn * 1 RERERR ERC ST RES, cones * _ SS : ‘ t Ro EER, Lee RS ge Cee re "ARES REDO esa ae EG g: Foo ; 7eee : akg a tae ry age? Np eG EASA TS eedane MenGRe Mar Oo Nagi ageRRS 8Oa “DOS BORO LS Vamos {¥ a EF =. 3 g eo*AAaSe 4SF so«:Faeatis : é:. 4:,. oe: ?acne MR SOR ahapa Seer aataaaaiitee es een. SCPE ATE oe , Pia Semen: pSf .Riera eeSE EARS SSSR RE teh esas aF :EEA eg 3aePi BA A ssseaelllineoies ee :SEPALS SRE g:RE BA Ero ae omen & fF AEE, ; DT URGES he .UES ae ae: EIS Be og ae mie tins se 3REC qaee 7Cee &ge :eaten SS eee, ae ar ir ‘ : sn PEE Be : ie “3% FEES ;es) LER ae SELLER SY 3set idRRS SS ROR ARCA RRR Beeson aROR cin tien tite oie nee ea ET TUR (ae eth. SORSSGe acne peers cae Rit ane ESRI OCR SY al Pogiehe ote 2acter wenes °RS ee’ - 2Bee mg 3BEES EEE OS eyes PE See ‘ BeHOP ret ae. Bre SiaER adnan sanati ois Soe : mF 3 : oe TSS ER ee OES: Ecce SSE aa # PORE EN acca ISA CORR bet 7s a oiy A : DoT neg es oer SSS SRR REM RRRSATICRR: S20" ED” sa RNR Ry Son ee NR Se ay Le LP ae an ey aes USPS RA Sei Sign, PR oe Deca 2 uk a ERO ARERR Ree A Sekt. cere COTE Ep aettin WES Sogn a soanaigetignaa Soe RES |Secet SOARES BREE eas 7Ts-: {DESIRE SEE, Oo Ste aeSe Sate a itRp ag a |.se ge ERR Coa 3 .Sawa 4 Eg ee aa ee an .ans onBen Mes go ae og TE q Se RR eae Fo Os seEEO cenSS ea aCn RS 4aas EPeSS Rn DREN ca

[Behn j . ; PSs a RR ge OS or weg Je SR

ae SE 4 sue . : :::7aSE: RES oscr¢"POR Geaeps amaoinn 2 RSE otogSRR Pa SenPeoO ee :Sea: ai . Brnesee zs ‘a. ADS a he Tot Shae TRUE RaVor ahie, a .~’.: ~

BS TEae ARR, eeFESO ak ee eR 2 RE RUREYER oggeo Cy he PAL BEBE DoENRC Se aeaaaaeh sige inceEe HERES IS Jee MEfo to oe > SeLO RI saa SERGE ASS oy at Sa OF ks .Baye . wy x oe tes : : . Lee eR . SURES os: Se ae LAAT iy glMaal. cat SSNPS SoSED and PeSe. Sas SESR OE©“ate E.R oe Be: ed BE os BUY CS Tvs an me. oeoyON PE ey gee oe mae aTene BS.°° Ro . Pe oa&: ae OSB OS:_-Se oa me Sg PS Tg VRE vo ge oe wars a: . . .. & bacSoe eeSg aeSe 3eeSoe. |.FyOM a: RCN i OBS aaSPREE RR Stale Be ASRT BR a vo

cet aeia . aes. i Ra See = i RBBB Pg BS 7% vs SRR. - fo ~ JESS She Be! Ts aS Te fo f FRE 4CaenayO 2ReeRae ea: Crm gee, eewee ae 4 x2 ee PSRs see I a>i|2 : 4age Ege Ree SER .- .ae as oo ae xEe Be ees ae sa oaeerss es Te :oy on °7. ty, % SRR RE . ” i. ”es... a or . _.aC oe BO ere. A NG. PONS oantoede SsONES ca ** . a :7 35 Oe es =OM ER 3aan =———— SeSBE Seceil RR Sec Tae aR . ‘one aae, :oT Fxg *ilin, afaeRRR ba RR eee eowk : oo enna eo ERIS Ropppitenes, er Same Saas oe ; xoe*.ed 4:pis oe :Se 353ete set nae eet, nd ‘SORES . Re PiPRI . ;S35" Saas Be aeogsio aaea eee .. Boe, —" Bisisiccen ie ON ’ si S es rape Sa . ee * & og greene ee rag Bee ee tee 3 me Bo itil s eS . ee i Ban bh5 x 3eee paste. alae SNe esosods cers # SUR. % ee SS. Oe ae oot. SBC nan ; -: Base. 2k Eterna gc ROR Nd gee | aes SS Shee See ae ae ik ie 2 SRR ae ae Nae aS CR en RR 8 : by 3 (Beg aSek =ARTIS EEN ven Tate Nn NE Se RS So Ry Beso =Hy :: SRS . 2°Sao ee ar ison wo SS SISA CSR SET Se.CQ Exe ? ta we 3a3Se Spengig . WEES 1g SERS ea ES By : Ea Sees ADE oe oer oh :. .%. 3 *3 Ret OU SEES SS SSM Re 3 sy Ke BROOeE aan cone te" RURESS RS Pied ES oe oe RS, Big SS one op aeaiin ee eeSOR aNN SRO Doe ies SA Ss SRM se: ge : BA aee, ean gee ee UT ERE Sg metas th a ot ES Ma ETO a ’ : ee be * aea Ba SES Ro gn Urea hi Con uae Se aes SY 2 3 nage EN OR ° , hy RRO A Oe ReeRAS Re tes RES RRS: + RES RRREE RESON awn eae +23 a ke EER OR oNeeINNE RSERS SNSOF AI aeSSewees ae2Sas J eh ® Rg SRSSESDSPA RS, a cai Kook so ROME Rye

ee i ienntie ee a ss Ree

BESS eae Oa SAR or UR ereNE SRS cae:2ae pte SS ss SOAS De :SS le oh Bee ee,ESE ORE Re Seite, Seen 7 RSENS iesee Bio oie he ge alPOR ae RS "US §° Posehn syoa ctBe eae teSate SN RNS ee aSIR ee =2BM 3Mis Oia” SSRN RR Re :x 3Ras xv BB, So EN ee ge ade: wae TE 6Sites bedi, NON ce :]*.cae ee GBT BLS FOO NI ON EE EIN aes ae *SRNR: a ". awe Se E3 ce tae in ee re et : : a 5s 3 4 RR ee Ne a | ONE a Shen % By z ea wer Pities AER wiSEE Bein ie ~ oO ~~ isaatsitan aieeaee RSS. POSER ane ein eae em tea eens tere UTE LD! 1 TR os Sa aE 2 SE > Fe SR eer BRS Bah BR oe os

Bs

He ISLAMIC QUARTERS IN WESTERN CITIES eee

Ex

as be Bh

Paes

eS

Be

ie

& Ren

Sys

&

Be

Se

a

een ROBES RORRNC BEER AURIS OCLsSOROS She ol aasinncaninnntlntsi traeae ir itsBreese dsc fie’ MEM caps ae RR RRA Mak SANA CU Nt eee op SS gaCOUN 8K RO ISR ARR ee een “SHODOSER SS EGR SS EAST SRS SONS Se tru Eee a eSi ASUS ic mets anata anion SONNE Sic ee Rae Rea ORGIES LTR aay a aie SOCORRO SEE RRS SS Rian sete ng gestaeOS RSAS ISSR OT CCCOSaSARE CREUSOSS 3 OR RROD Se NEES RE RRR A RRR SSS TRUSS RESEND NER US Se ear t RUR SAR NSURREEGE ERRREO Sueeerare ESE O r Fea Seat aRapenne anit SenTES we ctige (ann ae CNoREe OAONER OnETee RR IERan asSee MER a eR EESROEESE SSS EES SSeS RaAE Sea manny itanegia aeenage SSaUG 8CN : ea SS SEA EaG RRR TEee SAR eee RUCC ERE eaRSRUE eae HSE ateee BOE :ee

RR ae PAS REENES, sg ecg SSL G SSS COCR CERUfugehiae ADC RS COO SS se HA SUEUR ERE Do Se i sip od SESS es NN acraae ee an mle SOURS SE aa SERee ee es,SASN Pon RE NC ». Sore ee te ee er eee SERRE SERRE BASU: ee aonac ROS Ee EEREEREAT ESA EES SSN RS eee SS SIAN SRPMS 2 SETAE ME Se SARS ol Say Ae SEERA Ny eee nag ee eaten a a aes nee Ps eecr See iORS A Oe LEIS SEIS LTE RA RRR SEE, 1 RRS ASO SRS EER ai HT Re: SSE SOE GAGS ISN SSSR Rae aRS RESC 2Bae SERRE ESiES SRO GREE, os SRR RSS 105: 0Se Sere eeke Sees eee ee BOESS ee areSR ee See BLUSE aheR ERR aSE aSSy OE on watt Fe CAN an OS a ok aSEARLS :na TE aeaaeren Bee cnRS eh SOO San Or eae ROR BK A AIBN RRR Re SNM NG ST RU Son I setae went neti taati ntact gaeis oy: peeergiiicnt se A TN Begs : wet ite, ESS) SSE RES SES SRR

ae ee ge ” ea ee

SERENA ae cence SG oe eg RAEN SURNREAe eEEE ES : ia, TREPRERI I ar ase Be een ete ie OE nL aE Y

PR eS CERES RS css OS CO COS a.aoe aePDB roSoOU neMM die cots Ra crgywah Sag? BSS a See RES “Sees SECRIES eS ER ae oh gD ace SR SSR Le BPs, ER ONO RU CESS eeeSOB SEES SERCO Benen wosSE ne RS einoes iar taen te eepsetige Sree ONose Seanee oeeee he BEM Sig ahs Be 5

i SEROTEC SR ONE OS Sean aete an: S20 Soa SErcoo aiea ERR SERRE SosRRR Rescues wrensamni inten alli DEMME oy MSR SOS ee :castanet us Pmrreemn EE ESE a SO aRee RRO nto oa eC qlee fn .eeOEE cnc rrrB Sa

SS Bee SSE Srea ee ING eS OS 2. osle. aBae a anal me oy eS ge eeCoe pee Gili es oe ee vos ae See ee er ee cus pn, SEG ci aOe ce ces Pet Tet:RR So RR 5Kee SBR oe. 5 hot :iy onSe eeny ee ye ;..:te:e.cazics So ee ee Bg a rime, eis ‘a See ON See eee ake RecA Sree aiSEES aISeS eseee een Sra eee a a aGe seOe . ES a SS aaehee ie ae 8ke re ok See: BeSe aerate he Sa ae eS Lk ee SS eee ae aeae

s oi Bes ighite sti oer aneiaunnianrintagnity. dertscammmaanemennn nan toneiaemmnae t BR a SN REE IS OR RB RR RE ee : CEM CR nie” Comte. Sg Re Tie

. ORE Raia es uu e s ammma n cs SOAS CEOS Sa Oe nega ae ead ede Sa ERNE. ORM No aie Sk, RA SY 3

Set.oSSERS ae acces GRE ReEeSee ae oN eS RESCUES ae eer Feae. eeae «get Re, EEN RE SRSSB SREP PRRRE SeoSA Ceheh a eeSaeeeS4 2

Sage | i RO RMS STE ccc MRS ne ee RS PRS S CMEREREE le, TS A 8 RRR RE ae Se oo eSERMGS. aPEE aaa Be Re aN ;Se ere:aee Smee 3 Qe aBec a oer RS a RE ean aSSY Sec II oS ORAM LS RRR,ae 2 SORBONNE FI G U R E 28. Ey eaeaS oe éeoCRE SR NS ces ree re. oeRRS ee. ree odes oie ee ORR ge SE oR oP a:PCa ES eassh eames bec aes 3BERG +090 honk C6. A ne SOMME Ss tec RR were . 7 : SBR Re MRE S| So be GRE SE Peta . SS RMR Ua2.0RRR Se ae RR

‘ :reasur Ps eefenna SR RE PERE TS DERUARS Baas. Boot SS:SOTERA SMMRE OaRRR 0 CRORE IHBR ye RS Set, seya gsho SsTgBan u an S io CSORRRS. BE Soe RRR: Se SRR see Siege sonnet osROS ay “RMB OO RRS ale os ty 9 OST RRS ‘ ‘ LF:See °. 2: aR ROR RERERRRS SS. SKK * . TREE... Seige yy RNC cliRES, aces ce So SSR RE et id . ta eS BR Bg RE RRR “RRSERS a RRR nie RC i SR ORR ae A ager Fre ts SS eT ge SRD rm ° ORDA Sot agg SS aaaSSO SOR RN Se ;23 EB Bee eee . Be. ree neREN eee SR a BAe eS 3Se : Risse RR RB RRR RRR BROS NOS Se IR ae Oh wth XY. ROMA Se Ss . an ERM ce. te Nu I Oey ag ay > sae Sy we 2 peg Ge ES RES SER TS aie Bae: § PERRY SE oe RE: Be i RR, ODN a ss SE bie oat . : fe ‘ . ° . DUB we ee hie ES aae X gees a 3 ESR 3 eRe eReRee eRe ER rnDS oe tlRES i:SY; OS : st a od whet RR aES PY REE Be 8. eng. DESe ee SOS OOS >Pg BSoe ; ft “4 “E een Er1; SUE ees aS See OS Re FY: eee SHE PB OOF

, Fh, ; ; nr Feu er ;aagaREE BORE TERNS . ee |ee ee Heese Sot 1873 (L’Esposizione ULSD ee ORRuniI SE SE.it,ee 3aeePe go mae SO: Oe MRE Bee a ee S| fry ey ; oS ShCoSE a Se Eg Reet a CE. RPT V a e | ;Vien n : ner OS GERERE SRG:aS oo Bes R 2 RPS ae RE EOEii} SS i rN ; heareee Ye eya ae _ : eenope eee: oleee33 Recomm RO I I Be ae ee Pi FY Bs, os5tyee ee ee a© Fe xaePoe: i ok Me. : wo we roeaes ELEa 5: ae Baek 4 Recea aes 8feORE 4 bxaaa LOSERS MB Ss25 Bee: SE EM RR SS ba Bo adWty, Pa ts By le cee eeRNS Oe Fed "OR SE RE GeBEERS. Be se| ee ROP es pass oR Bee oP RRRR Reen NeeR KE ghee Sens we a! xOO BEER age 8 ESSE ge CO :]33 See mm rsSag SS GaSe Se Se re Ce ES AS” BEE geSG atsaRS eeNS ae cae eeRTBsCe Re Se at33eS FE :j 37a we eas Pee warsesPees ee MELO BE SE pe eee OS * ME ME”. 7 Lo Baa ae Ss oe ‘ Ro EOE oa A Ee ge PRE Feta SSS Le TR. SORENESS He ME Pe EE ee § FERRE RR. Po . SS S35 0 Suck TN ee PCB tanenctensccnouiceati ¢ Sappenen i 48 4 BE RTO . re 3 % 3 b Sa SEER rn RE BE ie : oe . ote#FR& eceed ee gs Se EE Seusorsonoacenens SS RSet Reepenes eg ee Sn RE ae KE OP Pig. gS BOS, “y . mane Tsa»Papet ke ee TO RE AOAC eM BR CO Bk UR »oR 2 heae ei aaecc BSemgcaas ; Ege oresBie Pa schg tustatanes geeswine |3ance a ony BRE S3 a os oa nee eerOe an fat’ 3 ‘ ve FE 7 ao aetagcat RMNeeSS NAR awe le on er Mis ee EeSoe ae,NSSar ae; a aa). s

f - os Soe, # ae a ee OO cores ion ee ee , we of a OE RN ASR Se are , & oe “

pieoe SgF y aie | foe o< Sae SIE Ry aRRR IS AR aleERO es moe ye SRG weA,anes ones 3R3 ™ ck 2Sieemeermncaar as ae. ian |doe OR Xseee RUCoe eegoROR ERE Si i:ee ar ee cone yr 3%ig. an eo 6a, GR Sak? Roeccscia RSpe Boe FESS, ORR ae eePTaOE Ee Se, Ey ok BR RRR OE x. 2 Pees EIRiy CSREES. —_ ca AI geFOP SEE oSaOE ne nr To i fe nesSBR Memes. eee ieee. cESERED : ae heCCR 1 SEES SE ip eeOE 8 Key ae @° Fi f gS ae :aBNR aoe es 2x see

aBS KS 4&(Et YR aR RR SRE SDR. REE ACL SA ON ae? yRe ee. NYO a. ne x -nS Se, RMR cco k ceeEE aeerie Bea SO . %e:~ :. TE Pee reSse EE as < Lg 4eS ate ak DOES a a“SSE - : aOy, EERE o= $o: aake he a eteee BB

Pe aie FRAC: . we ES See . : > . Fy Lap + 5 .

ee ON Ne SE Bole cet Ee eS Se

TE EE SE LE EES SRET STEELE EROS ESN COE RR Rs eC ce eae ne cme ice en ete me ee

SRR anna cnSeaeRreR errean teeRCO Meee eR aeRate er eS: ee CeeRGAE Liat ittnion thanSOOO mga RATES hha eee ee ae pi TSS SES ES aetna eR de BRED SOCORRO RRecRRO PSS SESE ae ee RSSE a SPEER ROOshana SSRe ca aSR RD SRR Suen aoe ane ag naeaR mea ree neaa: oigihuatiae baa eaAapRRR maar SR RRR eRe aI ian DOR aa SE Re PMD ORR MR Ss SS aa SSO ARERR UNS SEO ORS RN ON ot SONOS OR SRE ROR RR SER NRC SEEDR MS CS swe SR ARE ER TSE i ee sa hate a ea ene eRe Si SRR ENO ea Spies oOI ER TE SEES ear eR S22 pecan,CSS agua mana med aaa his eatgre mien nemearaes cme nABASES ane 2 SSSR SESS TE Lea a aOR RCN CORRES SRNR OSE OEEns SEMR OS eeta *s SY Pe age seSOR eae yr aaah Meena eB nat Ls oe a ln incarnate. ahaoc Meeas STEM RAE echt aot oe Soa SEES Taian a a ce ORR RRO ce. Pate 1-6 OL RR SOS RR Ree ean ESSEpoorer Sa MRS SE eR ere Sea “3Sand operas NHOsneBER ee NUL itdGo Danang RERR o's 3527. SS CORE SRE. aSea ese LSpee PRSa a a SS anata eaR a iain NaS: CORN a SERGE Zag 3SSA 55 ieeeAEE Feesash EE SORE ReeSane Mita etrauanneptnac gg eM it Dinas St hagean ROBE Se ESSSN UE RSS nee ana pioind gee aeons EEE ER GE SESeaeacupc eSge oepoeSmonger Bee ake. 25:o, wage fed AREnear REESaSER SOR

See ee eer ea eee ee es OS EO REE SS = Ra PER ho SRST teesEe SpMtaSenetahs ao caeoie hs ORReee. OOO a COR eeSS ee ots SSS ENO Mig Re ers a soso, oe EPS eR ge ee Sse es eei.SAP eS eee an Sore LE aay Ae an TRESSee RCo nec SRS See Lane. eeSS pio |8 en phen CUS BS OES Se ee eee eeen SR ESS fT ERMena RR rate RS a RRrr ae : eee LS RROee RRROe hc: CRS ORES. i * Tt,ee Siemie a peen Le TOE at i anes, | MESES ae DE EES ORCS GRMN pc Ne REO SR TREE ee * OSES SASS

ee ee ot 7 = BR OER Ee See eS a co

steer ont eee, RENE beadRO "RRO RSS ERC carnage : : eneSERRE HOO E GG IGE SE “tes ees PEGS RR eoSESE «SENIOR CaO a : PERE Ri 5 SC SORA SS REE RE Ss PRR RUSE, Seep parunuesnae ace Beshecaat obitie, = “RA ar SRE SeeARERR. CRC PN AEE3h Se Steg posta nea oe3S.ESS as DCIS SRS a Bieta :SefGY Nj nS MR we aed ORE = RO SSS RISC a Ree SRS OR gg BB Sy SS OR . cee SSeoa ania ee a REISS SOR eR SCC CE Mee aan . Se Se ee eS RI ES ER * oammumeroees Fee ee Re Se SRT oe % : re » Re ” Pe ee Pe ee ee,EEs

eet Meee a aET hoe Bet tg Jn SSha r mt ae ; is ROOa OO . : we 7)REISS SEOeH ODa eros, : bethees aMSe Se Rae ,i TE eS he8$y ae“&, ga TS oe s, te" ee ee ee MN, jYeigoSEae .me ee MS OO RE a oe “ ee oe Meee See eee SIRE a Sa 2 RRR Si SRM SC Be he OE OR on BEES og . 2 ey Sc os eR cn R i oe RE OE ge OE Soe papas apm SRN hay od . .Pee s “ke See a SEES | ESE a i oS ey Pigh, a toe? EE ax SOUS ES * fies ages ae AY Se ag , Bearer* on ee a aeCe oe Bo Sit ea oe %PS Rei Sao wy oP3 RS cn, Oe AE ee 4 ar, BO ns OR a. SCS, RRA See Se re; Bere SES Be ee. SOP Sa NE on MAIER SS, Miah, 8 aa, Ye: Sam asa Me Bo. ILE CIE A

, Ae a

Ae ee ERE Re oe Be oS PRBIMIG Po SeSESE OX, Jsgag ER he eae aes golSOON BEN LESSEE Ee SE SiAAS SS eg EEGAS SM.SERIE poiln PS, : ewBSBex Bh 2h Se NINE Gen

Be oe ch. a :ik"ag SE iBSSaSat.Re SGaPS keRRR an:> ERROR i ee” PER a “acea SSS EN TUIKIS ki h fCa: Vi ES Gi TE ee, ne: Sa =:a2i:otRO SSIES Reeee agg a SSaEO SET ;ODRE a ‘ = eR att oe Ke! SRRESS ie Se eye eee Bele OM e, lenna, Rance ota t Eee AOL ReaROS eRNEmE filsLay SR OR"=‘goles. Ras NS aeicci Paes ghia eeeSSeee te x J ee{Aee Pea

RS S re Ip TE ES RIES BES cag Ti SRS: CO a) ° IRR kek > PARR SES Be ane! Rais saan ieee. 3 someone RR. hin

gg,% Nepieee: a RRO, 3 Pie ees 1 Le. ERSaeOPES Bes se SOs Ba s Lae 2 hh,4aaa Eg 1 gee ag & a eeReet” Bese eS RR RS I, gS.RSS. Os Se 1 873 (L‘Exe OSIZIONe uni OR m {soEee BA 1, VSORRSRRRR aCA CRE TRE» °c - BEBes ase HRs NSE Ai ggBee OR RS IRSSe ARS iin oe.Be RUSS Re ens SeeKERE Oe Se oes Mieot TS? SRRRg 2 RRS Rca eeeBeko . ASR Bs io ROARS cami 2)BR RSck, Se PO rr RRsat i lice° gh Saree se LAME SS ae

at bie OPA onSAS eeSe. Me: me ae pees GRO 09eRORE SR, SE SIRES oA S% Ea ee. 3TERR ae Sa BeBSNS cy oe eran 9 oat OA poe . OSE SEN ysESELES vsNetty CS ae BS afeeReon TELA aaSE RR Nes ees «BRB ON * pe EE . eee eR EB eae: ae ae ; 7 { a er a a “Mae SS EHCER PReae IRIy yeaa oy 5Ra OB EO RpBeas Re ren CIGD

versale di ,Viena, no. 36 4ES ARES. SHR ook Bc Da Be eeResSee eeaCRO eee . . Re y : 28 Be ENG SPER CES RE SARC OS 2 ag:BSE eS Sas epee gw! 4,VO Au OBORE LAS ORT ARROISR CE RR NCC, gs no RR ied S Be Ses Be Ry Eee. We MR oc ON

BERN RRR et Ct ES En eCTE EU SL, AseaBBR: es RS VEREGE Sete BOs Ea 5 RS Re

Boly al .RR BR oe is ORE OE SE OS SRhaa EE . fo ge ° PES Rete” arate isPage oa aae:ae: 2ZePo a“vers ane ie wg, seeds pe iS Re GRR eS EO CS egg : -Ln” SES versa e:/./ena, no.is. a: “cana yeme aerie Bese 3 oy PS Shree Ses ilRY 4MMRM ee aes, Sit iaaa Soe. EDaeSa SE an Bo ae TR ie SR SO SERIE HT, BOSC oats EON EE got ee :::on :“Et ia .*: ss 5Sage ee RR ye Te iBogs Se RR a SO ai: PE . EIR Beg oS Le x.3. :he Cio stspie ns oe : Bot ae So ea OO TE Ree * : ER os eet . WOR iesoe, Be : ge Comes one pe RRR CE ES ae SS ago. EEN : a pees WOES fot Lo : 3 : CSR BROCE ae OEE EE SORE 3 F EAE go Re Oe ee . aoe,SS

“e ea a : : canes Saecee eas:..... Arr 235 ae oa OSS READERS OR 2

aa : xi.ss coe i BRB EES go5) POU RRR ts ’anae -.vee :5hkas a: De % 5BRS ane om gite Oi ae we re aPONE eg o= 2cae we Bs.IR LORMMRERR Ree chee aa HES - soe ee 2 es ee Bb ee ae oe es ae fat ake Berk SS 2 a to eee ee ase Beare SieeS aRERN OCC Na: naa ri ieee Ress cecaA,: .ER ry SSaS EE,SE Sot Sierernmnaee Sian ace Bicones LON . i I SR eo aSF OPES . SR eee a TEES asSick Cee ae : La oR co ae.rere erage Sa aee ne, ReeACARD lose steel aeREE Bor Se teta aia 2Bi :Bae . LE gees seatitiy nono: Renate eee ER4 arreigen 2BeBe Een Og TERR ee ee i aa : im . : : eo SESE —rrr—r—“i‘“i |eGE a Se aaae(Siege LR: aa aa Be ese “ge PREP oes BESO SO3 ae a Siecrews eca BIR aaa a SERRE ¢ ; RR, So Pe ROE areee wg cewnln MES CENSOR es teBoo) Sha Boog 4. Shei Reson nated REE Se ee a,: wf i ee Aces, Sas ee She. onsaS BES a Reo ar co ae Se CARON oe aeP BE SEEEES aoege 8 eas RES . AAR aRmea * SER Bie gee oe ES SESE ean aosSeea us Senta eee Peat fp ERARe SEE te ee Ea eae EkeSECS SEES UL”4ag . . R be eae Son ae * oe ee ba, ae a ee ae SOMA AD a Setigtnt Fa yy Reareeenaerert : eo enKe ead S RMA a ane coe “ an aeS, SE leSa ee:xae:-ay - Yo*eeDyas OY EeSe, TEENS MERSe GtaES ks eeASRS ae oe Bae RS . ry °33BE .: 4=Me . z% *zwes eR,i _LeSee tkFS PoBeste ve eco BBeOnRO esse Neg ES PAG Shs aoe og a = . aay Ae Me, ee SSE | SERS Se Sapa ution sies an REELS Rape B:

s : AD * . oh Sa eae oo ae : — i a So arn oo) ne

5 x z POyeNS eA:SAR 5 _— 5 oe sy % wea .ae. SR % . LENSER a nag Recreerend (RB ES SAR Fo:Seine! ee ee ney eee SERN A BON ae ee aeSiSeoy . eg

ooSaar i eeiiWes eeEDSgss *, 7\ “8oo oe Se SER SEARS oes i. SOF oeaotWe .a, BeaTate SERED Swath Bexa vs ee noc ae a ener ° » pie a + eT TO osoc Lae ee +Se=one oe wal os gees % . &NaResdewaies “aae, “8.& :* BOSS Ue=Age ecBeas (akg OP ; mg “§ oe :‘aheee ; 2 * Se. Rath

Se LSSBETS PTL) aaron os ns iiaeons escames crane eer ne. BAN «AKO ee OnBe, oo 3Chere |. leeeaemneneeS osRia . SEO ence Se Ao BSaie ocpnox Paes —— eget ede es GEOR es es died ane a Siig ME Pe aes Seonal aAS. ENS SR ear OE Heath? ee Cale uateO wee we Sel a eeUB PRON greene (meee REO ae Pree . aot ee Se Re SBE Dhearns rtCel ears wean! eene Se Eterna wae cegnaeseeaaid eeaeeens BS HE Eee aoo RASS Ses. peat whip eee aire Wee Bee Se aS BE AES erve ese Seki Set eee ny AA Sa CaS de ih Te SeraBe ace ener eaaeone reerpanier (MATAEee 4 cooe*Chaegangmects 4

SESS ens aASS UMASS ws OeesieseLe OSS iene ss Sees Sop ve Ce Eth MOIS ee Ss OOS RISES |. Ries MER BEees Se ee raitaanete UAE ftEDS Bete nenaie ee TOES STE? vot Ee eeCERO Te ete Lie AG ST aS ssRERUN SEN eaua aa SeSek ca cei saat Ee BEAR ee onees oeEIS as he cane UNS OEAS eekSb sesSe taeRate ohaeTOE Se: ais Sash ~—r—“——OOC—S—S. hee ae a wwe rrces ereeee ee |=|erg ah2beaoe pe ee we Sea.)lhlU ff oo oe |

ee YY ee E

pe gn td ehaertlttereee glee co Emme Boe ee

LE Fe er ee a ee

FIGURE 50.

Rue des Nations, with Ottoman pavilion to the right, Paris, 1900 (Bibliotheque Nationale, Département des Estampes et de la Photographie).

along the waterfront. Nations considered more important were given larger sites facing both the river and the street. The allocation of space to Islamic countries in the 1900 exposition made evident a hierarchical classification. The Ottoman Empire and Persia, both sovereign nations, had their pavilions on the Rue des Nations. The Ottoman Empire, perceived as more important politically, also faced the embankment and was located between the pavilions of Italy and the United States, whereas Persia’s much smaller pavilion sat on the back row, between Peru and Luxembourg. Egypt, now accepted as a British colony, was with the other colonies in the Trocadéro Park. — ISLAMIC QUARTERS IN WESTERN CITIES 89

ee ee eee ee USE RR FIGURE 51. ogES gi Oo AE . | ay : Greta 0 ee ee ee ee

a ee ae TS Re ee a a0 ee ee eee Ep Magaga ~~ U0! | - hot thes dS 5 oe “a. ; a / : Neik: ; s A 4 e. athe, so Eo poten al é “ He ee 4

View toward the Tro- ees af ees oe . ti oe : fat * ot ae - _ | as

(right) the Algerian pal- ae. ew , aes 7 7 ace, (left) the1900 TuniA.Pa i ok sianand palace, Paris, ee i(ee | ea . internationale de 1900, & 4 . - ce Pe iin :1 eeeee ae NG a oe |Oe ieae ae fe ae i aaai| al

ee |. a &

sili ESS ee ‘a Le et du ibatiment, yl gtoeSooAe Late i | 1| ||Qe | We ae LUspecia

en eeeah an)ae |g ee a| -Dp A ag peer A lau ae: eet ee i a | a : ae Ba geo aedlagttaa ell es i | a ee A

pe A aEe a| eealep eet | AM

!,|:~\|

eee ie ice Copal MM mer WZ, peek sei oa hit * A ai Ceate Te j

Bi ee OS hing te ES re | QE! yy Lo. Yj)

~\ _ Ww

| Vd

height of the interior space from the floor to the top of the dome was obtained

by the superposition of two Egyptian triangles, whose height equals fiveeighths of the base (Fig. 55). On the basis of geometric analyses, Parvillée argued that Ottoman monumental architecture and its decoration were systematic and that the triangle was the primary form of geometric composition.” In Architecture et décoration turques (Paris, 1874), Parvillée presented his discoveries as a “key, a link, a reasoned explanation [une explication raisonnée]”’ of the ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL PAVILIONS 97

yr | a ul mf Ih FIGURE 56. Ul )\ ill . ; 7 | D Ablution hall . CIA Js D :(/aaa, =~ a —_ \ yee——a a A ! NG 49 EE ~ |

/:

Parvillée, plan1867 of the ieSalle { -—_ AE lobb mosque, Paris, (Gayee RSS LH | ntrance °y ; uy JAS — B du mirhab zette des architectes et = S a es ge C Salle des horl du batiment, special =aheo 4 = ! ame es NOrOges

issue, Paris, 1867).rv| tli E,! Veranda al

compositional principles of Ottoman architecture. He claimed that he was correcting the interpretation of “Oriental art” as purely a product of fantasy.‘ Viollet-le-Duc wrote the preface to Architecture et décoration turques, praising Parvillée’s studies for their “spirit of examination and analysis, necessary for

the discovery of truth in the sciences just as in the arts.” Parvillée, he continued, demonstrated the role of “‘cold science” in these artistic productions, which on the surface seemed to belong to a world of dreams.° In his analyses Parvillée took part in a broad contemporary debate. The concern with science and geometry in architectural design and the links between Islamic architecture

and geometric principles were widely discussed in France, and not only in Viollet-le-Duc’s circle. For example, César Daly, a prominent architect and architectural theorist, in his review of Owen Jones’s Plans, Elevations, Sections, and Details of the Alhambra (1842-46), emphasized that “geometry [was] the base of all form studies” and that “to become a great artist, one had to combine science and art,” science meaning geometry in this context.° A similar line of thought was pursued by Anatole de Baudot, who reviewed Parvillée’s pavilions in the Gazette des architectes et du batiment.’ Baudot, looking

for a theoretical premise in the Ottoman architecture in the 1867 fair, concluded that these buildings were based on harmonic proportions, in accord with Viollet-le-Duc’s theory of proportions. Baudot felt that the pavilions of other countries lacked the serious, instructive, and novel aspects of the Ottoman (and Egyptian) pavilions. Although they amused the public, such structures failed to inform and interest the architect.* 98 ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL PAVILIONS

SS SSS SS SS = | —C~Parvillee, facade of the

52 SESS SS SS SS SSS SS |=== mosque, Paris, 1867 (Ga SSS |= SS zette des architectes et

— SS eS e|\ age Se du batiment, special

Se el | === issue, Paris, 1867).

ee ey See ee ee WIRY SS= Ne NO ENN eee

ee eee EE ——————————— ee (AE INNS Me wee eS a See Ae fit) = ns LS SSS Ee

ee ee OE ge oo SS = SS SS Seale wee || AB PRON GS, Sis ne a Se WEEE —)sd ; wae fr,7 .- 5"yinSALA oe oh oh chs ‘s ARSE oa,

Iat,apPoyREN GR Ne _ ™ , i a a ee emma: ie Ca wy Us BB EL ee : : . ig Cae > o oe . my eg * = . k . fe RES y 24a

Poe Fp rs Re }.4; BES eS oa te,otgg Ge . ER : eee ran: i .;.j;;Ep ‘ frog a™ eoogg ~ SOON: ————n- aaa thei net aaa ctaocaecaenaaeaieasamaicianasiaia poeemta eS ® , ay ‘ OR ROGIER A atta aes a i 3 a s ae . is ReaeSEDER Bm 2Tae iN ows “ecg a — : :ee fee| ree FaoyeXN : geeeRFBe -Bg By& ee Bk. 2 gS

wn 2a RF 4 Ragen FO ERR Ee se aa +e : eo Uae .Sa. Bes ae Saree ee a,eeRe eee, Lo a a . giao: Looe Bann nosomes A cet enn .TyBe SLO USSR netizneenins on tae. on . “eae RRS oe Be. ye 7 ROS 8 ea ghMet ee UREA SPRATT PSR Sn NTS en SR RR EER eo SORES: Se eee ee eee ade fs : re Tang ns ies ARS SE ae PO ee ee ee ee See es RS RS ANE ROSETTES EISSN Se ie aS oe) KXS073 : nsBaesRaSh ee aN ae gleeREeeSS oN nee we: ee reg IESE SRE SRchee osSe Ne aaSenn - oe ee a AUS, pe SO ae ee eS a ae an so aera ee. eon Me

& a we £4 Stent re __ ee en ee * i, TORRES OTROS SAT, OPER Se SSS TE SHER es, Sse RSS ee Re eS

i

: t

ee ee ee re ee ee ¢

— ——“—ts—s—sts—s—s—s—s—s—s—“‘“—Ssis“‘“‘i‘“‘“i‘“‘“‘i‘“ ee Fe i ee ESEREE ALB? corte SS lL Lr lcgaintLL LCC BERR LLL SES ag anitaee aati inaaeenr meaineLLC sare eee seme aa eta CSET RN Ue RR TAS SE RG SL REA eae uimaweteae duct cunaa nea ace Ui SRS ae ae i ae eS iat CAN 9 INSEE GS SE SI De

Serie US cs eeTELS fo.SARE % Sess bytas ts,38ee= i$5352 ae r {ata REE AeERER apy Et BS aeae#9 oho 3 Res Se §rierx ee s 5aaa&RB SSETS * Bye a MEM ise ae BREE UGSeae GR ET wee < SSer RLBip oe Bf. Me. See SCOT Oss!be CR eine ke 2D cg. | ~ ice9EN owas Rue TERE

nies See,RIE SPST 3 Hv Bow a t 3 oy eae oper Ce 4Hck Ay aea PPS Bee )ORES SMR sete caseRok ciecar5 ceccceccere FIGURE 74 ere eee? WEES el)Bae Reivse coe te Es MOM ee‘eee ig eee Ne Oe ga Bee 2 PEE te cae SRO Me Se eeeeae

. . SISTA IL Tg sea or Dy Seant es AN ee a8 ae Ga, ee PO “ *§ Stee Mes Ba DEN TLOLL e a8

Egyptian temple, Paris, =§ = ee. Uh ra ah re Mm ; i, | 7. Il i a 1867 News, (The16illustrated aeonlin aepon SestaSSO a London No- So ow HT Pe ee 1a popu

ie: sf RRR eee RM IS, aces PES “$96 S ‘8 colt i: set BRS: Oo AY Sg _— Soy ae : A BE soobadsiaiees Bs awd Turina Stee vember 1867). 7.: Bet ee ee.tieahec ay Sete Be me ay ,meri , SayomOS eo © nee Sees.) aeAo TT.—-aeiamamaee sn) es haeCoS? me re eee wane! Me Ro ee Bu S54 441h) 8 ateadmee WigES EEE

og ui BgpceUH AgagAe =)eer aaa ie Segments renne ten os ce Sonal vee x ern essNS ee a ere Oe PE Sie oy ise ; ogee SoS ne?| aan i er |co! ai kes ah ve of Bane: ce eeZVe ae rrati? aTsitio NENT eeree a eealeee | aaoeeepen fe x ed EO gti ogo we s Ae ee a be ae ee (PES unten: re EROS

ae Gee Sy moh | a Ne gf go PRA we Gee “get

. CONIC neo ¢eo. SeaXi Se eee, "Sa ayee2BrrRGB re eaarian: Far Ieeeages 84Bog | ty aBe) Pr LS es) re iBe ‘rn ~ re" i eee ee oh Te pene? oa fea ae bh AS Bro RCE Py SBE . a ee . eteGBP 4 Sees TCS a Pacthey 3 ARSTy sue P 9 Hea to ORE aos anarreeacat ths a SG ac gg Ss a ae aac cece cece ca ES Se sr a i

.a5.ee

In the West an okel is more commonly known as a caravansary, a wholesale market that also provided rooms for travelers. Drévet’s interpretation of this structure was considered an interesting use of Egyptian architectural forms and

«e.

3 3 ildings.>> I | outline and detail

J e °..

construction methods in modern buildings.” Its general outline and details

’.

.e syge ; ,

were adapted from several okels—including those in Aswan (the okels of Shaykh

‘Abdal-Miansur al-M d and Sidiidl‘Abdallah); th harabi duplicated duplicated thoff the th allah); the musharabiyyas those

; ; in Cairo. Drévet’s okel

Gamaliyya Palace and the Husayn Bey Residence in Cairo.” Drevet's ore! was a rectangular two-story structure with arcades on both stories and a covered central court, which had a fountain at its center.°” On the ground floor was a cafe and shops that faced each other along the length of the building. Here “Orien-

7 On eth. YF d fl4 *fé

9 3 b)

tal hospitality was demonstrated by free coffee, chibouk, and narghile, and

f, d.738 music was performed.

Jb

The second story of Drévet’s okel, like the first, was given over to commerce. Artisans embroidered and made jewelry, lace, saddles, and harnesses; vendors sold fancy pipes, mats, and various trinkets.*” On this fioor was also

I ” On this fl ]

114 ARCHITECTURE OF NATIONAL PAVILIONS

‘ *

ee ee i eee ee el ee eae Da le os EEE BAe oie os ee TT TE ee ee ee ee Gee ee PE NE EE SSUES LE OL COIS ELSE NLL SSE OH TDR ETRE I SEE SE CC RET TET Ea ER ge ee ENCE ST OS CECE iy, ot ite es

Se SE RRS ES ae Be gre a aM o MBRU IE ON a IA OOOL OAL SRN GODS NOE YS PRON 8S OR RC REE cE SER RRR RRR UCSC RR TE St CORON EINES ont oas as CASA cathtin yal. LOD gr alee Gee i ROOT

ES See ee RS IRScE NOES SS aT 0MON a Ce ai SPOR OeSE a LNG Sa OO RROo anORR COC eas OREN ts OC RN ERO ie ORI ane Ney RCPee SRR. eal aOe 8 Bai $4 SRE eRe testcase Re28S ONO ROR TA eA RO RRR IOcae SAR Re SONORA CMRTe EN CROaang OS eee Ty ee REN ROS RSS,

rrrRR hrc rrr—r—“ ’errmhmhm™hmestm— : 8 A d er ani

; : coe @ -Ol ee irnag eo eS oe" Sa { cademy ofeee Arts, Phi ee :Lb eepoe SeSS ae Say =:e3 ws BOG 4:Pas aelphia ae%ey \ (O'G a x: dS. Ph poe e. bae ; ny ae 's eee er > ’ la-| oe a oo a ae Pee —_ Bee a be ae we ccc eee ae Teese E ae Ss: Ree. * ae ees ns ea a ROT a SRS = Wwe, pe 8 oO rm an

Be ONS oy ee cee as vy He vee Re Poo Ree Danaea Shee ae ERS IRR a ween eS ee EN po” BS ; e ank

meen .OT case _ aa.wisi Bc Pe. oe enSEES Feoi Sy , eS BSSeem AES an Recer” Sa aes ses|}ae cee = *a BY as 3 Ar tectFr. envest 4eee asper oe3S erCooma fe oro ee aa See Be gS RE q& urchet of RSELot se ae sesaaaPs ayOT rea Pee =eR 5oe eee.. Banas uSS eg2Soares iSoe an aesat soa eesay aaa aeoii BS, 4 3 ees asSE! HR Oe ceoadie ee cao gpm SS oeete eeepea | RY : :4 : a4ae Bie : wee eee , henge BE so, Re ae 3ed Se aEae“eS Ree Wr ER ttoh oeYak. aE RSa a ala aSa = Fi Ya: 7 lin co mans = a Foo aes ae 7 ee ae os RGR Rs ° . rs 3 ag Wr OSS ooh oy Ree Sih Sah. b : § “ 3 RERINERES isha Be Ld hig. ae Sans Pa, ‘ Re e BS

JP8 aoe Lg s(Oe i Ke 3 Se SESS = ee Be_ ee ey.eeCS . UrNESS}. eee 4 Pee es Se 3 aara sine ee.so eeBe a ee S ape 5 eae Ee le ee — Bais ea Sy Raake Sone ERNE ARS .3.oo eaBSS wt snag ee 3== a. ay teak Pee ogi -es FePo Ba TERR =aSoa oe _Sees aa PER See ae Bs etFF 8Sis Se ge ag Bey. Rae RS, Bas |RS ieBa. 2ree oe coeSESS aeByEES SeSee ee ae fee ee 5 SS ee SS eeaege” ‘ee a.= oF ens 8- seaman Sse Sa IN SS iteS a! :Po sBs Bes tee eaA

oe Ey ¥ Ae Ba »..... Bk See ae a Boer Se ES See | ASR SEP Pk RE et cs a “8 Re §&a we SY se Sic, aoNES: ESSE Seae SSSS Be eS aaS SaSeeR ee Rei eS ba 3 ee “a get= SE!SO ee EP ese Setee oe eeeds eeee Boe ; a OE Nee Sa aes be aee Eee ee Bo IE aRE RR aoPen iee ae SoS nS Ue a ee CR See aNS Beae aEk ee eee eeeeSoe SRE eeUe enon ecm ean SE oe eea 7g ee en eeSS ee ;% 7 Ra ios gee OO OO maee ; | RRS See apenas is Se EN i ee eee ier ee RENO Rieter. on earn ANe Se oe SOR eet aS eas me 2 Eas

Re ae am US ee iesRE Ce ee ee DS eeAE : :Sa age ee aee eS tySR Cm aeyRa aaaRRB RCS ee 1peR aehrCe, EEE ce ee OS OR ae SESE ee a ees Se a a LRGs SG ON, Oa a eR ae SISEEEES Ta ga SUSE TAN 2 Tee

oe ee as ee eee BR . a - Ree ee os pees oR Se ee St Pe IRL eames ince

gogo SeTRO OS ISS SHRM SOs SeRene OY Sam . Se Be ea ia eae ea2ee ad eo ee QRS eeTE RR TERS SePORN :SN e Besse Dole Bus a ce SEES RR Oe eeeCR aman eee zasee eee CS ie eee ee BES RUS LS EEE. Re a” ee Oe SE OE PORE SSRRO oa SO PeTA ES Niel I ai i ee cree ee a Soc NS ace nS Sc hae et Se ft a eeBi REOe, RS SR EER Ra pe ae Sea

eeeare er| sin ee eaean 2SED RSge ER ie Sner tilted Re a ee i ee ee ee. ms aoo ee ES. Ti aR 7 oo a 8 eee aeee:TRE ee ae ee A ame a ae Se ie es ne ne Bary ns an a oe OSE SEG RR te RRR ee eee

..

See Ea SRSe ec Te DR aig A RooeerAE a ee ge SRScut CSE ae aagai RR ooeeBeeegeta 0Ba SSeee oS aee Rea TREES inc: aeete ReesRCC Se

5 CESSES SBRES & ES Bes s ee PS RR 88 SRR ae San tee SS ARR a :3Reena ee ae Bel apaROU Bis nc RRaca oh Benge a eae cooks eeeEe is aa. SRae + BN eR caRE AMR MR ao aa acas TORRR Sie PERS RRsine Oa com ee a eee

Beis rePhe em ES eyRT eee ~ soa ge RRRiE RR SCR isect gcES eRe RNerr Ia “ae :RRR SES | ee SRE Oe LES SR RN age te,ieSe aees ieoe. BER aed ie en ERR aeSe SOR TERRE RtGRE aasad aR NSeT (PORES SMe ERE Re Sa eee meee RES eae OR. ~ SRRe SESS oy, eo Se eae, NR RSa ec # hlhmhmh™hm™”mhmhmrmmhLhUCU eea oaBE ener ee ee Be ee bia “EOE eS ee ho TERRES: “es ee ok es eee EE a | ERE OSS SS ee peice UR Bas 2 thBee RES: ARS RRSS Re Ra US: SIRS RE eeERE ini 8osc RRoe BE ie Oe ireecee BS ESE Os ee Hee eee 4ee Ba BS fie ineBee ee ee poe ; Pe ee ear ean eee eo ee Ec RES eS pec ee ee eee ee ee ee ws So SRS cee ean i Se” SOL RR RR RRS IBS ns SRR SR I Nae Sa ge eas PR EME Sas San STRESSORS a eae coca ne aES aeshl hr hUmt— SUL SSE SA SES Sete Soe NUR Se enero rand a Es See eas HESS Be oo) SR ee esi . Se SR oss A “Seed oS SS EE SE sR Sc eg .:atsant ‘Sema SEB Sc ae aa-SE aeos ea ster RE aSe noe cnn eR Roi RE eR RaScraias eon Sea ROE Soe: ‘a SS A ce RS oo sen oe 2 ER oo ‘eecesee : : eee Bes Re ae te eT rrr Seseieaen Bee Ge °c ne ES .Sey : a Be : SRB pa BS ein Co a auc ae .iaShee Bese zSepa See See Besa re a BRS ne ea io es Se Bo ane See, soe Bo Ba gS — CO BES sss: 25wae Boe 2. .Soe ieS Tee ETcae 2 RRR eee ee Sees aaabaet ocgS Oa ene ea ie uae eres z {Ee Seieameamra See ee >“SS SERS eoSESS ean ea ESS eS oe :Povik 5ae.araan Pierre . co aese ee oh. Saree Sea Se ENS ARR ESE eee Se Bane PRE ei ee a"SES SRS Bec aBoy SScet ee Spee eeeEE aeene Pe ees

: . . : Ba es . Be Bey Be ee wee pees . shee BS aPease eae OEE oe Sey - . Shes Ba IS RRS SORA SURE OREO RUNCRC REN Sea SRS : ere ckPape MEE Se we Bel ae =SRC SR ee Bhs ee eee ete ean OS aeOa Bes RR EE2FRS Soa sees. ee olDada: Joy ESE ee See. Re Pee ne eS .BES . Ree oe BS ed nea Ceee epeeai Gara ce HERERO heAe SoBe Pearman SS . Sa : Ere eet EES ee: eeCSE ae Bs

re er ee i i se a cere

.i SOR eeFS a, SOR ie BRR ec Se Cee so ale Are ak vaRAG Stee: ee :ROSSER BeBoe OeSere Se ce .— Bene Me epee, c+ oH IRE ES SCR eae Go aSe ea aS tn wrens encPERS rect eae: wee ahe:Pe ge RoR: SS Ba Reyes “ge SESE Hee saepaeanee : Pas RR aR as LES ROR oe ee ROS ge Pg Bas oh .ae AOR ate Me CREE ROE Es oP est és Eo Seek ORR SORRRRRS BE R Isaeeae aR Be Se Sats) OR Jose: Fess :3Ba He SSE OS ee Ps: ee oe ee Se ae Bee OR ee eS ee . ore See Eee tre ee = te eee OR i ec SIRES Bie a BE : Ey cae ea AS ROS nes ve ONE US US ae, Se Satie: Sc Sen ok REN oe aes. aes a : RR aie pea Sacra te cae Seas SEES ULE SRORT RRS aR oe sea BRAS Neco 8ARS SR ate gt 7:Bee ee ae a. Es Ese esisieee AEN eR ‘Seepeiaeene aS ee Bo aARAM ORS SE RSS SRE ISS eee SeesUE BeeaE Seae RSENS SOUS RRS ee eeMee Se RR RI ee ES Ee Sek eee eee

£: Bee ShSeam SR TheSch age GED SRR eRe RRR SSS Bea Ba a SERRE Se AE ONE os ee‘Be EE Ree Ree. : fe— oo E: Soead enoe RUSSERT PEs oe eeteens Beck Bie sien kee ees Ee ee ooe. = esee &ES ce Re Re ed che (cr Sees. Sa PE Ba CSR a2 SSE SEC aie, ReTS oe SEG cage Bi3NE ea ISR SROSSRAR orSees GABOR Saeco eegate Re RES pod ee.Reni 2& es EEeee oe,OR ee eae Bepdarenana 25 aaa Rem a TS St CR EAE gn RE SS Re SB gS ca See aeEa RRM See a Re. RRR Rk SE eeGee RRS BRC Ba Biss Reaoe a4oS : ee Bes SeSoa ee UE pane em Pee et eeBERR RS SES EP coe oo oSee :_ :S

re eon Boe aS soRCS a RE re? Be pe OS se BOE I eae IOT ge es sBee S RRR NRE GG a ORCOE Poy ERR uae SOER RRR: Bsee SS a Ser ASRe ORCI ene Scena saeeecinage © ARE Teta :ee Bee aeae os SS PRO OUR EN ha SOBRE SEES Ree ONE aBOS ceBe apt ENA ERC Me ae oe on Paps ae otoe SORES: PERE otBeh SE RS OES ee sree OR SORE RRO Ae eons 3 Sas feee eR oeroeee a Sein Ncrnae DiaCie) Sh RRR RRR RR OO Sone ines POR PeeRe Be Seo AES SNE RAR Rye See TE BREE ; oe? oe = : oie eet ee RE” Re OO aeoeee cn aa Saas SSS CCAR Bea ie. eae sara Ei eS, ee we eS : oe “gt ae ee foo, Bees NRE TOR ERs ee pan eee: ard : gS ege ERGs age, ee SRS se aaa Saas DPI SRR BR ama Be ieee Wns ESS es meee i ae ae ee ee re PBS Be SES ee MS ee eee os ai SURES: . Te) sopRe REaeRR Bor :2RRR RR EBERT ee se ney iheFES ERS oa Pperaersiccd eS PRE See ‘Ties Saponibers he oS EeeSe BEBrats ; tO ae, Se oe — By BIS OS See OI OE RRS RE eenot an ws “ge Be e cook a Bee SePe: weea: ‘pero 2Bere Soe F%a :SRN AS PER ieCe Beyag 20'S Seeee Begs se Eee ot cee ae § an ERRORS RR eo Pg ae Beg ES coe -ieaese :i es ioeSeles ee Spoeeremmesc Beene yeee 5 2 ee RRseet SNR Re ooLo Se SE “BE TES: :oe. hee con eee RR Oe SE Bo ? PR Cn a BES ee Be Se Ke Bee Be ROU RER “" * ess Seems: oY RE ESE ec ee: ae oe. ; : aps: ae SERRE Se hi ‘Bete oS Bis Bs. . mot SORE TOE 0S Ae ast a SEE, Sea RK Us = a. . oe 8 TS 2S SE a Peper 3s Sant & 7 0 a pots Be : ops tne : EEE Ra

pe REN Ege Bae, RS pe eae 1 as a oe eo : = : ; _— eee ..HE finn 3SeBlk 5BSE Pos ER oe eee a. . BO SORE Ly,aRICE SSE Ss Pa ect See PURER ieee gape. ‘Soe ASeS % gS : Seite Seae Eo ae * Sere SS UR RSeae aeee ea ane hsce Bee Boson TE ‘e:.es pea aemaes SR” | Spee aoem ard Saas & pa aRee ee eeaan Bee ie 8sf;.-Bas Soe SEE bo aoe ee oe os os & be | Se ee Sie Es eS eee fe oo oe pes oe : Co ae eee * Be EERE ae “OR See. eee we 3 ‘ REE et : aeppaiarerte eee FA isapepnets ce SESS Ee Wes ey Big eSSee “OME . ose : SEES gh atPe ROBO a *2%. Fe ne Me a eteSTS RE EA oe SES oes coe Tee . . ee *Boag ee goa. See“a” 4 oe ie- eee Fg aBaperaaes zi se PERSE UR Tes gS a ; ee e. grt, PB ; = SRE Ber eae Sowa ne he een TRESS. ones Se Bee a i, ; & e Be EEE BEER OSS: Eee OE ate ee ee ee SaBe S.:s:: . oy i Pe AE Sees TBO oh Sepa ";SAREE? DE 5RE woes Eee Fee oe pa a: og LASS .oy te eo SEES AS 3aoe est aa :"2 2cen Sees 2SEE JEN Eya teSEES egSP EeReema. 3 ee SeSRE Soke orn FEE ie Re SEP A Beene: peed |erect Benh ee :-=se

|: Be BR gone ee eae RI naGt Pres RE: igee *,BEE ‘we He . Bess eSee ‘Soaeraceg: Sopa .:ixge ee.Es apse ST Se ne ee 2 re oe ie. : Be Se er SEE :aR we RTE Fageeras eas PEGE BE ce iRoem pene oe i. ee 2ae ae ee Seep Bee TMA SES ot SERS ecBE. coed es asae ee eeBSBs Bee :Rs Seethie ES: BBE Bees aBe Bes 2Pa =ERE de oe “es Ee E: Be :+:Pe PMS gat SERN soni Ee Ee ee nee:

| nnn, oo eae aSie. aBtosiconee Pe EE Se ee ee ieoe re SB EE SY Pee ae Se “ae aeEgy Ross _Be Y ::St..PERG . Bo OU Es ESIEIE Seogee Je 2me : a: E ge ORE a . ae oP oe Boe Ss :Bee : Bees Be SR, Fee 8re = Sy oa & ae. aoe ’ ae Bo Be 2 . om w% . LOPE M es: 3 _ eee: ies. ety te ae aS a ee oe a Beever ia yea, oP TNS UES ge os: Ean: . Be, : Bese ; aPMEE eneho Z Brey Se : Rag C3 ieBo BEoeee Ss ee — oo : : Toe SA eas oo aORT, " . Rc arte eenes gheres EE :. SE eos Pp atitiisdns CEN.: ;. : a eeDSc RES Re ET om Bees, ees ee Resa :NB : BOR ES, nS OR. : mes gba ee .

ee eaSR:en a ee a MR *eget: a en

REBAR Eee GN a seceiRspftones

ages BES PET on 2 Re

: wo Pree cate ee age Ee Gp es a4 gig a ne . oo eeeee ee ee IESG OE EE SSIES Pompei EE ei eg ee SUR LARS oe Se BR :a ee eae pS ROR a ER SRR asBree aEE IRee eSee aasa ABO ee eis tepet LeSan 3H aRIE ce eaee eyciaeeae BR tsi ibis ee aes rr ; : :eee “Psee eeRsne OM eps cg Re ee REE Pot aoaCES RE TPge OE Saee” Sed GEE OaSR ao SSBE aN a ae elsign NOR etoPep heetn Ss binnit ns + ha one agate SR en, ee:.dg a: igs ee EAeet : iA aRe SR EO aBe ROcigar vo capt tne ee Set Sn EEE, eSen egGe ope Ge Toad hE Se SS, op ne Se eteeer CE ihPEs ise aes EOE: : Bp ALE RIS SLC AaRE: SLO ROR RO RO ORE aghee kag iaEERIE cE oeBie paSa sha eSPE beER HES oe oe gh LO EG LES EE RS RN ERY SS 9 7 PEER OEE BEMIS Ba i Se ee :— WSS oetiahge Be Ls 5 es ee eae ere ee Oe ee ance Bete ga Sone a a ec gh SESS oa SS RRO RN OL eM SRC SN SS her a a Rg i as ag OR NE a RO pe ee ee oo nee . = Dee Saas Oe oe ERODE ct BE gt BE ig eee es Siiacs Reo See : Os eae ig RLS OSE ATR SER ye CRITE LN ee oe ES Ie a AT Tag Be PD ES Raph beks RR EE ti ee eo ee Speen er aa Se Be a NO RR SR Eee oS Ts as EN I Y

, oh DeOR gee re eR BSS OR eR Sky: SSN Paro ETS aa. “Fan ae RR ee Rn AO SIRE i eaeTE reMLE a iceRRR ae piRO reSRA ° ; : ee ae ‘ 7 . Es tS SRR RS RPS aa SRS Ce Ea PARC I a el SE ee ee RESALE Pe Ee ASML LOSE GT BOR 7p Babbin S..

a aAS cc Sg St ORR Olin EE eateecS; ae RLSTAhati Rb eRaena ° ae he .eeSEROUS NORTE agee a ay SPIRE ec ae ee ae IEE aOSE GOA CO nga Sea POET has cain cI ESbaBSE ARES CREE er SCD OS tii ae _—

oe fee SER neaeesten eShy E Ty Tne JESAelea ae, Bre,UN FinePe BN RR RE arefe oe:_. dh : DEER ESE tePOE ES oes TeeSea a aBERR EE INI OLte, ost sere ITEE EERR AA : CEE SRUS P38 cE igi aERR Be Ek Mae .::ce secre SEES eenoS pices’ ik ReRORR ep hea cna odes Sie Oe AO RE gine Sete One8 :aR COE RPE nag i) SEAR a orca *ne ee . gtPuneet ge TSaeOIE ae REaBR IISaia, Sia TRtires a ieBote Rn Snape cS eg Ta oonIOR - iS Se RR : Eps SO OPES Bingo) Leip gg Sy Neee Big Rts OeER Bae, a oF ts EEA ROR sone Meal oelL , er een ae ee oO RD OE SN POS aes ehh eae RM ee cree RR reeRe me osRELIES ca anet BR outa ae PeSEAM Baas eg Bo aaeeSe isGeeaRR Se .— “=7| aeee eeREC ce WE Mage Gyo nie RB, ade iad Be 8Ch ee RE aeges Re aa . aitiiatanieaiei ee nn es FENCE El aR ne ssaGs alia iiEC SRI he eeae OeONG Legere: TS ROE ECC EEE Afare, . eae Re eee ERO aeEe ae Nats OER ASC SOSA, TER OER

Museum of the Colonies,

Paris, ‘p

.*p.

is, 1931 (L’Exposition coloniale de Paris, Paris,

the “Greco-Latin tradition” (Fig. 119). Laprade argued that a colonial style would not flourish under the Parisian sky; besides, it would be impossible to select one of the many colonial regions to represent all of overseas France. Nevertheless, elements from various colonies appeared in the structure. For example, the surface decoration in the subbasement suggested “primitive civilizations,” the ironwork borrowed motifs from Berber carpets, and the Ionic capitals of the colonnade were found in a simpler form in southern Morocco.’ The museum was seen at the time as belonging to the esprit nouveau, with “a perfume of Islam and of very primitive civilizations.” ’ In addition, Albert Janniot’s bas-reliefs in the colonnade, depicting the colonies of France, literally conveyed a message about the nature of colonialism (Fig. 120). Colonies were

shown as well-integrated parts of the French sociopolitical and economic mechanism. It was argued at the time that Janniot’s depiction was like a “mirror of the world” and carried no militaristic overtones—that it was not “a tri-

umphal ode, but the familiar and grand epic of human activity and of nature’s fertility.’’®

The pavilions of noncolonial Islamic nations in the twentieth-century expositions also carried over many traits from the preceding century. This is perhaps best illustrated in the structure Sedat Hakki Eldem designed for Turkey for the 1939 New York World’s Fair (Fig. 121). The young Turkish republic, born out of the ashes of the Ottoman Empire, was represented in a complex that blended modernist and neo-Ottoman forms. For example, its main pavilion was derived from residential prototypes, reminiscent of the numerous Ottoman structures in nineteenth-century expositions and going back to the 1867 Pavillon du Bosphore. Its courtyard, with a fountain and brightly colored tiles, and its small reproduction of the covered bazaar in Istanbul reenacted other favorite themes. Meanwhile, the displays inside stressed the modernization of Turkey.’ The tension between modernization and a historically defined cultural image thus continued. Such a pattern has been common in the architectural representations of Islam in more recent world’s fairs that have recycled, for example, the familiar elements that signified North African Islamic architecture to the West for one hundred years. The Moroccan pavilion at the 1967 World Exhibition in Montreal was a square building with a sixty-five-foot minaret; its decoration—horseshoe and lobed arches, sculptured wooden ceiling, mosaic floor—drew on cultural

EPILOGUE 185

eee eas, EE ee “i

. . .— Y v8 venga asercay fen no he on, awen aeeee ven sae vs 1$eg Ry OEE Rea ene eTre sate RS Baha aa “on wo! Ssao, ;no | oti ee BS eee otes *ee SBE rec . Fe Besse Sag mia. oe=see eee PRPS _aatet Sey, ee ee —.e2ene ee.3ee Wy ee , f SS ae oss .

; , tet | 7.— eer aS ats SSEEEaenone i a ie geen. AN ce ey SECs: oe Bea, oe8.3gt SF MRL EIeee TEST EEN CRISSWS : *ahe gectahovmatgaie susege TtSre nie ee.Mass ee eae fe eeeSefey S OLE gs?” os ae . | 'a*“ae ee ity BRE. REEage gs ie SEE RE 8S Ce aS Rteoe adh reyre aene Seet: Se Led eK eeaos heiywr So 32 FF SF ELS FS SeefeSACe Se i) rejee es Be,

. a é oe ES te ce. He ay ef dP BES MS co” ee eee ee fe eS, Oe SB Eco ere es pigs ff. Bee fo ge 2 ee Sl 7 Pe ee cae i

ee ne ||cana TE”SEA Se esees Ts 2ar2 ame Be |TR gesis ag ae 3S RRaRe "RS 8 $3SE Po ea Ba agp WSSBS Sc BS RES ee BaBS aFe Ss. Fe Fe ree sys fe iBe eseae SSee FFE. SYPRBS HR Re Po oP 3 OF ee SO oe a .aae |a, 5aBaye) oe |—_ tye ety seer i oP i F; “eae, Se,a ops ae A OeSePP oe Se SS Re este a:OER, SRRersin Ae Rie ie a uy Oe atk: Se FS oye Sg Xe OS Se Ghee eeae ae se oS at, eS: ‘TeFegan LE. : a Sk REDS By aeifPeBi a Ny. Ke“Sak, Bic ageSh CPee ty,aaeOe ae aoe ee eS ance oat Ww 4 Sas eSBS FS Se $F 2Saie Ree.Be 3 PF iF? ae os Bae. ip OE © a aaa BBs:

i | | . ‘ | a Rew, | Jn oe. : e vod i ees 3S Ee: Bren Naess Sta an Pe: me a ge ek.” 4 a ee % ts Se ey eee Bee Re ay Be ee FF ; . Sar a ie 8 cept ge" se “a Ts OE ds eae : | | | ; i :ae ; i.pata . aeathe .% ee Rn. oe ad ES SOS Ba,AU “ABR. 'S SS PREBeShOh, BseeBB PSS ' pO a RO gag Be co ue Rosca: : So Se,HS bo Beast ceewesSEEEe ot romsBiaeEe EscS Eee. Ps5aeES eeeRR A ck Seas AE gnSie 5 odSeghPS af Or f a ae ae eae ogEE St ee Lge. ae wee ES S.C Reg Prenat es 8 ae eae ? Me Ce 2.csRaas

a :DORE gs3 8wks agiioo: Se Sa RR RE ies:eee |gS - ns SOc RE ee:eee Seae eee Be eeSa SS BES re e #8 Fs A aks eaeee OeBg ee% et ae: ge Se SM igBe Reba aia SO ||.|é|Pas os -xOP .:oy eage se Sho oe aeMARS eae Sea BS a PaO Ee, syan Rane a aBe ieiRe RR A Ie atee Ge ns SeasSR oh Soe ey SmieFE atseBEBE: £ FF" Sse Page iwi Be SE -cos :pare i3*"-Poogs ;.z:— iSyBa ee See SASS Ae. aE ok tebs He ea EE 8: oe ee ae cabbigis Si RM LIER : /g. a 4.gt oe EES — ae a aaSee re eg reReahREET ee tee eS ae uy, seh Be. SOS om oN ReSR SEE ERE EES is es 2Fog FE BSE, aesRS Se aseS ERSha SOR Re x.”S ereOO Ring” de: See RR CsTk ageeeee SePak aewrt, +. ae ey ae nag~fr ie AO8.INALT IN 2 VG isauh 9

“ Me BesTeh Pessgoat: EEwake Se ,2ROE as ES ce %SR regrFaaeNRK geaFSN BeReRee haBa REa, as RE aeSot. A Reeaisg nO RO SSE _ Sy SVSRS ;°Boeeoe , or aSe aeBears SR POM Peeh ee pris eR ee oe i 5SR RE |eece Bees, eae vs i 2$8 2ee oe rr «SS a :.cea: Tae a ge ST aBees. ag iaigeeso te,ar OeiMec BO ccoie _ oRRR Rata RR SSE ERRORS PRE ao 0 agE... Bo aee 3. Ree F eC ree Se * rei SE 3 meat re SS eet ee: a se SS ae ee ake ~~ Sr _. ee ri ey : a! |eo | ii —a oe al 38 32 SEN Bo NR RR Se E Ss aac RY. Saat "SBD onan er SE, eR Et. Bt nh ER aie, oe ‘ uepiitlieala s sas 3 SRR i Baas Sa eh aoe “eg re ase — i if BS ee. aes = RE Saas at ae SS Cee ee eee Se te ak fe i ae ee re a ee ee me See tinal: Se MR ¢ Ee creasa : 4 ae . ope ile: wise———— nla:Ne a.aeesaeSegoe A, PS a SySSaepena See OaNSciliie bine esTee SeReaesaan gS5: iSCR mi tiRight eres ayy:: ee — 98sci Sf os ee ae 8 RRS OE SRRee es SNR sae Sage Satateager PONGBae. eR a a,See PORES oe aste SRR ee Dia cages RR REN RR Pcs 7)

Se :rrAt &eeONS ee Serr &RE eyiy, eeOr pee e%, i ee er° ae rr Be ae aeRE eeae SO Se BE Seateae Bae Sei iyPets “ge «ise agate ee? aaa: ateae LOE ce age eR: ea Er. ee Bh.me BA:cc ea ee : we feo ee Pe SeeS ieBEF BE TES ce. SeeSa gies iin. eSpe BeWs eeis acest agonising ee” ae ae its Se eee Me Or neg Bee as OF ai Seam OF ae oe Seas eeneSee. eeanRaa Le apioe =.oh ee iea :ck. a ne &- See Sm, SLO Ce aeEs — ae aege ee gee ey aor:a RR ie Se Saae 3 ee ee sae See aane aSas AOA aacone 2 ike TCS RRR ge Aaa Se ie Se| re ORES Seok Bape Eo: Pee oeoh eR~ieaatise Regael eS atagama wien 2 TRS ee ONS gi Se oe aM yOEat RRR S88 SR gecc atMaas a CR oN SRS Raeaies eeEge Ot eesems Seen Sane Bie Bee Se Seetage a issEE gee ae nNRRR agaEES BOS aeseSt gegite ee2gi eeNN Sig ae NS eee eeas: eee Scenes ee te oe“ie, Poweaaa Ne ee ey SeeSR BE oan ESS SS Sahat Bxnei catePRE adie: oe aeOr: i: eeRe RRO rail aEaRate osHe BS iRE RG: Bege SkBae eae, agi eR opr Beas aOR gk RS "SERa ie ence cman ee—_— aii cc a ae eee PFCScca gtBE eee igeleaner er agi a ne Sin, OO PR a ae RRseapas iy Reeer Ses Bs Boiss a fae saa oes ae ‘ ae er raeaBSS SRE aS EP 8Re asi ” IO Response sens ESR eeeae acerit ORS SaBE a a ie GREE ce a RES, a Bee cocina.” esos BE OE: es SE a SOP RSS: degen “ag eis ae.” OE SCs Seam BeeaSoe cgi ets eee ease E Rome egSeite,Ss ER Se ee ee* See i geo ReOS ER. "ean “aaa. [Ss ME ee Fee ee Me “& aeae ‘sa ry 2aais_.* oeme

we RE pce: SSAe sa ne I TRS PS ’ER FE esate ioneendnnce aeeeeedar i eroe ceeOES ae REO Rea: RB Re erte aie, aieenaence Svicaes Seeereeoy ita na a Bea ti RS. ahaa Sa Ge Ry apr "ae ees aces ES BR MS ee OE whipd Bes fee. ceait&ge £SKE eentoe Biesei 3S oe TE PRES Seennn geageaneat ‘pee, fae GRR: eae ee aati SLE &Se chOS ge:aearae ite obs acdSoe Bee es oeRS teai.Be t EEGsfoniee ei oegoa eh” let, sie era Sepa eee eoSS eeceeee esDORR Rem ey Seale RRC Rae ONS arSao iesER ea Cea are Tada | say ri o CBEST ty‘ide ott gare ess rsaBE See aes ageleng BEE Baggy E PEE Re see RE aceon Scns ee S. ES SRE Be oie SR ‘ang s e Silo. Beak a SRO ire” 3 SOM.Sais MR eoOe ert eSee RR a 2: ee ae Bc: eee nae a ee ee. ee | ¥ Pe a Pee? er 4s ok ded eo oa Se ee me a SENSE oe fo a oe _ ok “ae f % 1 sf fo. 1@ e 4 C tm: 3: Pa eMCig fe ge tin option, oc Beaee ae aeSRG oS. See a aes ESea Se EO sag SE BUSI EES gras S “Be pt eg EeeRenon eeROR peapnectnc A SE, SN a Beagrie i So ie, Fe ee Ly iL .. Sine eo LeRee tages ieae vagal tee aS oe ae ge ar ee PS OS Be eS Sy RS GRR. 7 BE ARS SOR, RN. oe BSc, RR SBRB SRE gaa ORR RS a aa Wi cin oe eee aeiiaitaat REoo eSPE ¥. ae soaSe RsPS one GesglrefigRv Orr te x Ppa aes PERS , Bee toe BT seSS BRB ogOe cEalBES OeEon R gp Se ieer ee S Pee ae _a ee Do aS|* ae” Be nose ceBA OgCe a 7a aaRa om 8 eeeee “ees .eo ws aati oi a Beit BEE. a 7S BEES BIE een FES Bcc OR “op : POSE ea es age S “Bee aS a eee aor ee nlS an. Se aie ae Bee Uae Say eae fs a“ Peas ee a oe f é e wc Meer (re SS a. oe REE Og ER Be, By oe ee es Fes oe Re Se Ee ae Se ee I eS = wf oe a a oe, ae ae NSSF LE RR RGSS RS 3S. Sea ene BOR Re AE oo “ e | SER ae St a a ° : Re PR RE Keene RED HOP VEER ro ee BE I ae AR er a, eae SUEDE SoC SES ER a et a SPR i chageatnni 2d Settee eta REE RO ee cc oe oe a ae 2

7reBe aa: RE RR* cae eri teteRLS Hot ner aSer tthe Ba SR So eae Coe eeSBSa tena Rage a Sa caeeMe eS a Aapee AR RE ae ¢ ce io i,gesES vBSifSEE -; SRE, < osceaes6 Bibi, _OER “BBOa|SEHERES ee oFbc oe ag ee eeaEagestae parma ee iat eea.eee cae uaEg oe “Se ps ” Siteeaats TE RES BT RES. sam: BORE— cere: BE Rigen Bi fot, gstPs Siae Se Rc SO SAAR OB et RR Reena feutarrmeaninen gene ee a SRE SARK aR.a | Oi: Sea Rint CR Sckiaoaae Sees Serena SNea eek me om To RS eae es OE ee oe Be. ee. 508 re ase ee an Reoe: eeisro PeSR Re: see OR OSE Ss ee ceSaek ee Ee oe .aGR aSneranaMinanaane _ aeSe eRoe or &Oo he Bis BS ees : 4seit Maghes Seen aan On I a ee ane nN eeehy. pe aeee BRS Ree Ulett hs ae ak cane Ba i OR ES re Raa aera Pe Sa SRS Ronn: “Seana nase SR cs. See eeSee a Be = ior 4 atee . _,ia peewe ig aes % eae £ CPwg BE og goes ROSES EoaOr eeod ie Se ae aPeeyfgEos oer an “yer at ve 5 oe

é, ee, wale PR3 poe OP of ee eeSEaeSe eeRE SSRE eeeagg ee hRe aBER. Bg Na! Pe geSs: Se Bee See a iae Pehs von wea ee ae Re SS cue ergee teihe eeYeu RS RRaasy GE A, 2seeome sige eefae 4% oeReenecties ere oe AS oe rere ee HOES ge NE RS” ag Ee ae ae‘See a ¥OS eS orm Pe Sa ie te AytMa . aged ee, salRsgfe bsapie: a, fg ete ee ieBee ve oe SAREE Gage RENr peCRS a8 oO alsa pape SE Sai Lge. as ee eR Rae ereae aeSeaaee ce ih aeBs CoLa te ee- eau Bs AGE de2Be | Se. eras ate, fe CURSES BEE RS RES she JL PES gE RR ge re nARS RRRR RE Ca a RR CeSeSau, So... ae RS DRS % Peat ie oeFeat

a *ooapes esSOR ea ES sikResa ee ae 2ean Pd POEEE i aBete ee .Peg ES aeMeg eaePugh ERoo ec, : See, gee ReteagBe ‘Site Se say ae aeSeReISaaae cae a ee ASS eeSeo oe wsBe‘" a ye Pres oar RO eR... 2 a se eeEE es aeiaae ee SS og ae RRR SS aoOBE Su ToS sehRS re BOS Sa So SS a— ey ak uy ee — Sin oatnf 7 ga Bi SEE aOR Rig teas PoetsSNS ee RAE as Be RErye ea Re So Pr i“ES SORES 2 SER LARSa peptic one, ae,TO , (OYBaa SRR SR Re ee, Se ERS aCSREES PD SS RR EES a oeene BS eeeeeee OR otba5yoocd oe SE * SoyODE. RR gS RNCEES OES eg Bo ge StaytASE Beespetite : 8 EEBS al eS ae ae Be‘Sea. SR ‘EPRigtetecsn Shee eM:ce BORO ge geBae ae aR ORES sah Ssi ee ed "9(ay BLiu:EeetROI: Ege LEER RELeBEB BEOAS oy BRE RgRSS RS Ne REE a BEE ES DA aR Ss Mi,a NR i a ROR: ae Bite eae SeSeaseaSte ediaysSewed we BM i: , ~a ee

SSee Seen, eon ame Rs re ae es EBS BeRES aha eTni. geea ge OE Ee PO SEO Sy EON ce ae Room Peepo meer ye Ss EC oe ce ee 6 AY SN‘e> pa ey oe eeeBeeeeeeon ea oe Fee eee