Caste and Communal Politics in South Asia (Department of History, University of Calcutta, Monograph 8) 8170741378, 9788170741374


216 55 26MB

English Pages [229] Year 1993

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

Table of contents :
mdp.39015032501283-seq_7
mdp.39015032501283-seq_8
mdp.39015032501283-seq_9
mdp.39015032501283-seq_10
mdp.39015032501283-seq_11
mdp.39015032501283-seq_12
mdp.39015032501283-seq_13
mdp.39015032501283-seq_14
mdp.39015032501283-seq_15
mdp.39015032501283-seq_16
mdp.39015032501283-seq_17
mdp.39015032501283-seq_18
mdp.39015032501283-seq_19
mdp.39015032501283-seq_20
mdp.39015032501283-seq_21
mdp.39015032501283-seq_22
mdp.39015032501283-seq_23
mdp.39015032501283-seq_24
mdp.39015032501283-seq_25
mdp.39015032501283-seq_26
mdp.39015032501283-seq_27
mdp.39015032501283-seq_28
mdp.39015032501283-seq_29
mdp.39015032501283-seq_30
mdp.39015032501283-seq_31
mdp.39015032501283-seq_32
mdp.39015032501283-seq_33
mdp.39015032501283-seq_34
mdp.39015032501283-seq_35
mdp.39015032501283-seq_36
mdp.39015032501283-seq_37
mdp.39015032501283-seq_38
mdp.39015032501283-seq_39
mdp.39015032501283-seq_40
mdp.39015032501283-seq_41
mdp.39015032501283-seq_42
mdp.39015032501283-seq_43
mdp.39015032501283-seq_44
mdp.39015032501283-seq_45
mdp.39015032501283-seq_46
mdp.39015032501283-seq_47
mdp.39015032501283-seq_48
mdp.39015032501283-seq_49
mdp.39015032501283-seq_50
mdp.39015032501283-seq_51
mdp.39015032501283-seq_52
mdp.39015032501283-seq_53
mdp.39015032501283-seq_54
mdp.39015032501283-seq_55
mdp.39015032501283-seq_56
mdp.39015032501283-seq_57
mdp.39015032501283-seq_58
mdp.39015032501283-seq_59
mdp.39015032501283-seq_60
mdp.39015032501283-seq_61
mdp.39015032501283-seq_62
mdp.39015032501283-seq_63
mdp.39015032501283-seq_64
mdp.39015032501283-seq_65
mdp.39015032501283-seq_66
mdp.39015032501283-seq_67
mdp.39015032501283-seq_68
mdp.39015032501283-seq_69
mdp.39015032501283-seq_70
mdp.39015032501283-seq_71
mdp.39015032501283-seq_72
mdp.39015032501283-seq_73
mdp.39015032501283-seq_74
mdp.39015032501283-seq_75
mdp.39015032501283-seq_76
mdp.39015032501283-seq_77
mdp.39015032501283-seq_78
mdp.39015032501283-seq_79
mdp.39015032501283-seq_80
mdp.39015032501283-seq_81
mdp.39015032501283-seq_82
mdp.39015032501283-seq_83
mdp.39015032501283-seq_84
mdp.39015032501283-seq_85
mdp.39015032501283-seq_86
mdp.39015032501283-seq_87
mdp.39015032501283-seq_88
mdp.39015032501283-seq_89
mdp.39015032501283-seq_90
mdp.39015032501283-seq_91
mdp.39015032501283-seq_92
mdp.39015032501283-seq_93
mdp.39015032501283-seq_94
mdp.39015032501283-seq_95
mdp.39015032501283-seq_96
mdp.39015032501283-seq_97
mdp.39015032501283-seq_98
mdp.39015032501283-seq_99
mdp.39015032501283-seq_100
mdp.39015032501283-seq_101
mdp.39015032501283-seq_102
mdp.39015032501283-seq_103
mdp.39015032501283-seq_104
mdp.39015032501283-seq_105
mdp.39015032501283-seq_106
mdp.39015032501283-seq_107
mdp.39015032501283-seq_108
mdp.39015032501283-seq_109
mdp.39015032501283-seq_110
mdp.39015032501283-seq_111
mdp.39015032501283-seq_112
mdp.39015032501283-seq_113
mdp.39015032501283-seq_114
mdp.39015032501283-seq_115
mdp.39015032501283-seq_116
mdp.39015032501283-seq_117
mdp.39015032501283-seq_118
mdp.39015032501283-seq_119
mdp.39015032501283-seq_120
mdp.39015032501283-seq_121
mdp.39015032501283-seq_122
mdp.39015032501283-seq_123
mdp.39015032501283-seq_124
mdp.39015032501283-seq_125
mdp.39015032501283-seq_126
mdp.39015032501283-seq_127
mdp.39015032501283-seq_128
mdp.39015032501283-seq_129
mdp.39015032501283-seq_130
mdp.39015032501283-seq_131
mdp.39015032501283-seq_132
mdp.39015032501283-seq_133
mdp.39015032501283-seq_134
mdp.39015032501283-seq_135
mdp.39015032501283-seq_136
mdp.39015032501283-seq_137
mdp.39015032501283-seq_138
mdp.39015032501283-seq_139
mdp.39015032501283-seq_140
mdp.39015032501283-seq_141
mdp.39015032501283-seq_142
mdp.39015032501283-seq_143
mdp.39015032501283-seq_144
mdp.39015032501283-seq_145
mdp.39015032501283-seq_146
mdp.39015032501283-seq_147
mdp.39015032501283-seq_148
mdp.39015032501283-seq_149
mdp.39015032501283-seq_150
mdp.39015032501283-seq_151
mdp.39015032501283-seq_152
mdp.39015032501283-seq_153
mdp.39015032501283-seq_154
mdp.39015032501283-seq_155
mdp.39015032501283-seq_156
mdp.39015032501283-seq_157
mdp.39015032501283-seq_158
mdp.39015032501283-seq_159
mdp.39015032501283-seq_160
mdp.39015032501283-seq_161
mdp.39015032501283-seq_162
mdp.39015032501283-seq_163
mdp.39015032501283-seq_164
mdp.39015032501283-seq_165
mdp.39015032501283-seq_166
mdp.39015032501283-seq_167
mdp.39015032501283-seq_168
mdp.39015032501283-seq_169
mdp.39015032501283-seq_170
mdp.39015032501283-seq_171
mdp.39015032501283-seq_172
mdp.39015032501283-seq_173
mdp.39015032501283-seq_174
mdp.39015032501283-seq_175
mdp.39015032501283-seq_176
mdp.39015032501283-seq_177
mdp.39015032501283-seq_178
mdp.39015032501283-seq_179
mdp.39015032501283-seq_180
mdp.39015032501283-seq_181
mdp.39015032501283-seq_182
mdp.39015032501283-seq_183
mdp.39015032501283-seq_184
mdp.39015032501283-seq_185
mdp.39015032501283-seq_186
mdp.39015032501283-seq_187
mdp.39015032501283-seq_188
mdp.39015032501283-seq_189
mdp.39015032501283-seq_190
mdp.39015032501283-seq_191
mdp.39015032501283-seq_192
mdp.39015032501283-seq_193
mdp.39015032501283-seq_194
mdp.39015032501283-seq_195
mdp.39015032501283-seq_196
mdp.39015032501283-seq_197
mdp.39015032501283-seq_198
mdp.39015032501283-seq_199
mdp.39015032501283-seq_200
mdp.39015032501283-seq_201
mdp.39015032501283-seq_202
mdp.39015032501283-seq_203
mdp.39015032501283-seq_204
mdp.39015032501283-seq_205
mdp.39015032501283-seq_206
mdp.39015032501283-seq_207
mdp.39015032501283-seq_208
mdp.39015032501283-seq_209
mdp.39015032501283-seq_210
mdp.39015032501283-seq_211
mdp.39015032501283-seq_212
mdp.39015032501283-seq_213
mdp.39015032501283-seq_214
mdp.39015032501283-seq_215
mdp.39015032501283-seq_216
mdp.39015032501283-seq_217
mdp.39015032501283-seq_218
mdp.39015032501283-seq_219
mdp.39015032501283-seq_220
mdp.39015032501283-seq_221
mdp.39015032501283-seq_222
mdp.39015032501283-seq_223
mdp.39015032501283-seq_224
mdp.39015032501283-seq_225
mdp.39015032501283-seq_226
mdp.39015032501283-seq_227
mdp.39015032501283-seq_228
mdp.39015032501283-seq_229
mdp.39015032501283-seq_230
mdp.39015032501283-seq_231
mdp.39015032501283-seq_232
mdp.39015032501283-seq_233
mdp.39015032501283-seq_234
mdp.39015032501283-seq_235
Recommend Papers

Caste and Communal Politics in South Asia (Department of History, University of Calcutta, Monograph 8)
 8170741378, 9788170741374

  • 0 0 0
  • Like this paper and download? You can publish your own PDF file online for free in a few minutes! Sign Up
File loading please wait...
Citation preview

DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY, UNIVERSITY OF. CALCO'I'TA,

MONOGRAPH 8

.. . . . •

Caste and Communal Politics in South Asia

· Editors



..

.. .

Sunmjan Das and

S..kbar Bando,-dhyay

KP BAGCW & COMP~ · New Delhi Calcutta

Digitized by

Google

Original from

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

GLt:>:>

First Pllblulud 1993

'c")

K P Baachi & Company 286 B. B. Ganguli Street, Calcutta-700 012 1-1896 Cbittaranjan Par~. New Dclhi-110 019

4~ '2 C:37

('1ct8

© Department of History, U Diversity of Calcutta and authors ISBN 81-7074-13 7-8 The publications bas been subsidised by University of Calcutta

Published by K K Baachi on behalf of KP Baachi & Company, 286 B. B. Ganguli Street, Calcutta-700 012 and printed by Shankar Dey at Sreema Mudran, 8B, Sbibnarayan Du Lane, Calcutta-700 006.

Digitized by

Google

Orig in al from

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

PREFACE This volume brings together . some recent research on caste and communal politics which is undennining the delicate balance upon which the plural society rests in post-independent India. Social discrimination embedded in die structure of Indian society-lies at the root of caste conftict, and this certainly pre~ dates colonial rule. But what occurred under the British Raj was an official legitimisation of caste identity and a consequent politicisation of caste conflict. Caste then became a reference point for the distribution of colonial patron.. Unfortunately the_ Indian nation state has failed to rid itself of such ·c olonial legacies. . . Heightened caste tensions in the wake of the publication of the Mandal Commission Report have recently induced social scientists to look afresh at the past in a bid to find a suitable solution to an age-old problem. On the other hand, whether or not communalism in the sense of Hindu-Muslim antagonism had a pre-colonial history remains a debatable issue. But there is no doubt that communalism devoloped as a major irritant for nationalist politics during the colonial period. While colonialism ensured the transition from community consciousness to communalism, the Indian mainstream nationalism failed to adequately confront the ~ommunal issue. Not surprisingly, the fond hope that the partition of the subcontinent along religious lines would resolve the communal antagonism has been sadly belied. The communal backlash following the demolition of the Bahri Masjid on 6 December 1992 has undermined the secular and democratic presuppositions of Indian federal polity. Historical scholarship in India today cannot afford to ignore its social responsibility to meet this challenge to India's com,p osite culture. The publication of the present volume will hopefully make a significant contribution to a rational understanding of India's political and social history. We are deeply indebted to Professor Barun De for contributing an introductory essay and his generous help in editing the volume. We would also like to express our gratitude to Professor Bharati Ray, the Pro-Vice Chancellor (Academic) of our University, for her help and encouragement in all academic pursuits.

Digitized by

Google

Orig in al from

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

[vi)

Our colleagues in the Department, especially Bhaskar Chalcravarti, Basudeb Chattopadhyay, Harl Vasudevan and Aron • Bandopadhyay too lent helping hands without which the volume would not have seen light of the day. Rajsekhar· Basu deserves a special mention for his assistance in preparing the volume. We would ·also like to take this opportunity to record our thanks to #the Department of History, University of Calcutta, for sponsoring the publication of this book under its Special Assistance Programme: •

8 March 1993 Department of History, University of Calcutta

Digitized by

Google

Suranjan Das Sekhar Bandopadhyay

Original from

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

.



;

co A Note on the Contributors

• •

V

••

viii

1. · Itttroduction: 'A Mirxor Cracked f,om ·Sido t\'Y'Slde' --Colonialism, aass, Caste, and Com.munalism • i8Gr101 . '/M



1

2. The Communal Riots in 'Tlnnevclli ·-in 1899: ·Some :;aeao

.

• •

Arun Bandopadhyay 3. ..Colooialism, .eonmun.- ~ :Labom : a · Beta:J,our~d. '.t,f~r Qf .C~ouspess and Expetjen~e Qf the Calcutta. Juk: ¥iU Wo~~errs. ~88~ ~ 9 30 ••• Pari,,,al Ghosh .. 4. A Background Study to ·the Emergence of Caste Consciousness in Coastal Andhra Pradesh • V. Ramakrishna

5. Casteism and the Communal Award : 1932

47



99

• •

119

••

145

Ha.ri Banerjee 6. A Peasant Caste in Protest: The Namasudras of Eastern Bengal, 1872-1945

Sekhar Bandopadhyay 7. Propaganda and the Legitimisation of Communal Ideology : Patterns and Trends in Bengal,. 19051947 ' •



191

••

211

Suranjan Das Index

Digitized by

Google

Original from

-- ..

.

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

A NOTE ON 'nD CONTRIBlJTORS 1. Ba,un De, Director, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies, Calcutta.

2. Arun Bandopadhyay, Reader in History, University of Calcutta. 3. Parimal Ghosh, Reader in Centre for South and .South East Asian Studies, Universit)· of Calcutta.

4. : V. Ramakrishna, Professor of History, Hyderabad Central University.

·

S. Hasi Banerjee, Reader in History, University of Calcutta. 6. Sekluu iJandopadh}·ay, Associate Professor of History, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand~

.

.

'

7. Suranjan. ~s, ;•R~ader · in History, University of Calcutta. .., . .' . . . '

.

.

'

Digitized by

Google

Original from

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

1 INTRODUCTION: 'A MIRROR. . . . .CRACKED . FROM SIDE TO SIDE'---COLO CI,ASS, CASTE, AND COMMUNALISM .L&.L,11.........,,

,

Barun De

A bit more than three years ago, some time before the events of 'the present discontents' as Edmund Burke would have called the crisis in Indian politics at the North Indian and the Central Ministerial levels in 1989-91, the Calcutta University Post-Graduate Department of History organired a Seminar on the subject of this volume. Scholars from various constituent Colleges of the University, from different Indian -Universities, and from Dhaka and Oxford, attended. Some of the papers drafted for it, based on postdoctoral research, either at the History Department or in the Area Studies Centre for South and South-East Asia, at the University ( the only exception to this local composition in this follow-up volume of readings, being Prof. V. Ramakrishna of the University of Hyderabad's paper) were revised for publication in this volume. All were ready for the press in mid-1990, except this note and the one by Dr. Suranjan Das, who has prepared a topical paper to replace the one he read at the Seminar, which he has since published. 1 The others were written without advantage of hindsight of 'Mandir-Masjid-Mandal' politics : which last year turned 'backward class' and dominant peasant caste agitation, i.e. casteist revivals from the pre-Independence epoch, into Central Ministerial political expediency and the cant of newspaper headlines and videocassette newstrack primetime in all-India quotidian and hebdomadal media. This predating enhances their present relevance and Das' contribution enables readers to get a feel for one young historian's view of the limitations of modern Indian political culture in face of continuing divisive and communal in-citements towards counter-dependant contempt and hatred. Indian

Digitized by

Google

Original from

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

2

CASTE AND COMMUNAL POLITICS IN SOUTH ASIA

politics has not yet succeeded in creating constructive alternatives to the persistence of minority or. majority communalism. To be asked, without having contributed a substantive paper to the Seminar, by one's younger colleagues, most of them earlier one's students at a Department, in which one used to be but an honorary lecturer, to think about and introduce a volume on a subject where past and present still has a look-alike character, is a singular privilege. The best I can offer to them is to seek to explain how their work-derived from a variety of themes and approaches, not all connected with average research methodology, on caste and community, subjects which are generally dominated by anthropology·-fits together : and to then comment on its general import. The present volume has been brought together as three pal.rs of case studies of group feelings, not all of them necessarily casteist or communalist, but called as such in reportage by state ·officials. No necessary centrality is attributed in any of them to any mainstream of Indian nationalism, i.e. to the Congress movement's orgaoii.ational leadership, or to political appropriation, as the case may be, of the Indian masses. Their participation in the national movement by the Congress-led freedom struggle is not taken as given. But Dr. Parimal Ghosh does consider the intersection of communalism with mass resistance to colonialism's impact by the labouring people in Greater North Bihar and Calcutta. Dr. Sekhar Bandopadhyay also delves into the possibility of opposition at local levels within some of these movements to Congress and Gandhi's leadership. He ends on the note of the isolation of such subordinate movements in what may be calledto continue the river capture metaphor-''oxbow lakes'' such as the self-ascription of caste nationality by the Namasudra jati. Sekhar Bandopadhyay in his recent Calcutta University Ph.D . . thesis spotlighted ''the weak response of certain lower castes to the nationalist movement in Bengal'' as the product of ''a new social ~ategory called 'th_e depressed classes' constructed by the colonial sociological discourse and subsequently politicised by the policy of protective discrimination.2 . In response to this process these groups began to m:vent traditi.ons to _provi~e symbolic justification for their new i~e~ti~ies~ Their 'littl~ nationalist' ( kleinjati if one may borrow a · usage· from the Germa,n term klein:deutsch) movements were abo. of· a ·par~ul~r view of , history. In this 'caste' ·a ppeared ,to.~. - ~.. CO

- . POUT1CS 1M SD{, m ASIA

odla Sudn a>r1 11ria,1oe•ir1 like Ba!ijas,_-1_ Boyas to wear the sac1cd thread. He opened a school for "UDtoorbabks' at bis residence and made them abo wear tbc savaed tb.n:al. ~3 This process al "Sarskri!nation' was I' xrally follu-..cd b)- a caste' or sub-divisioo of a C31te when it i1■■prOYCd its matc1i.al status. It desired to do IO by aduptmg Vedic 1il«al, qui••aag callings considered degrading or polluting, taking to ~.-egetariaoi,m. child-marriage, discontinuing the practice of widow 1ee;wniagr and giving up taking liquor and sacrifices of animals and fowls to village-god~. Two exaa,aples may be cited in this cmk:xt, from among the nonBrahmin castes in Aodhra, wt,icb have adopted Brahminical custouis and cereninoiei-,, viz_, V('!lam~ and Kamulis. The .K amsa1is were known to be more Brabminical tban the Brabmin~ and apparent!,· the same was the case with J angams also. l -1 The Jresiden~ of the Depressed·Class UAion in •K umaun, Almora in tlie United Provin~ in _wbi~h he: had said : ''This -meeting declares, its no-confiden~ in .the , Congress movement which has been carried on •in .a nd outside the country and condemns the method adopted .b y the Congress :Workers".76 · When Gandhi heard that at the suggestion of the Prime Minister, the Minorities . were about to produce a settlement which would have the effect of the untouchables getting the support of other minorities and pafticularly of the Muslims, he became an,c.. ious. 77 Indeed .t he Muslims later entered into the Minorities Pact ~'with the object of further fortifying themselves''.78 ·''Thus the minor minorities'', ran an Indian Office Note on Minorities problem in •the R.T.C. dated 1st September-4th November 1931; ''were frightened before long by Gandhi's intransigent attitude into active steps to secure their interest.'' 79 Gandhi was paqicularly shocked when he .came to know the terms of the Minorities Pact which said that ''with regard to Depressed Classes, no change to joint electorates and reserved seats shall be made until after 20 years' experience of separate electorate and until direct adult suffrage for the comm11nity has been established''.80 He was dismayed to find later on that despite his efforts to the contrary, the report of the Minorities Committee had given recognition to the Depressed Classes as a separate political entity.81 He .w ent on to explain ·h is position in the passjonate words often quoted : ''I ·can understand the claims advanced by other minorities, but the claims advanced on behalf of the untouchables, that to me is the •un!k.indest cut' . of all. I would not sell the vital interest of· the u11touchables even for the sake of winning the freedom of India .... a,nd therefore,· I want to say ·with all the emphasis that I can co111mand that if I was the only person to resist this thing, I would -resist it with my -l ife''.82 .. · Gandhi's -.defence of his position seemed at times illogical and inconsistent to the Depressed Classes members at the ·Rou11d Table Confetence.8 3 - Inside the R.T.C. his defence was that the .Hindus had seriously taken up the cause ,of the Depressed Oasses ·a nd 'therefore :there.- was .no reason why-.they should be given -political :safeguards. ·.:Outside the ·.B...T.C.. .his· ·r e ~ g seemed somewhat -different.:;''Muslini11 and· ·Sikbs - ~~,rw:ell.m:g~ed,~' :~aid G_a n~t, -

... .

~

9

' Digitized by

Google

Original from

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

130

CASTB AND COMMUNAL POLITICS IN SOUTH ASIA

con-

"but the untouthables are -not. There is ·very little political sciousness among them· and they are so horribly treated. ·... By giving them separate electorate, you will throw the apple of dis• cord between the untouchables and the orthodox'' ~M Gandhi, it seems, was caught somewhat unawares with the sharp edge the lower caste politics had been developing in India. As C Von Furer Haimendorf wrote : ''with the establishment of the pax B1itannica over the subcontinent and the improvement in communications, caste solidarity extended beyond narrow regional boundaries'. ''Railways efficient postal systems, printing of vemac,ilar newspapers85 and books-all enabled the representatives of a c.aste to spread over different areas to meet and exchange views on their common problems and interests''.86 The growth of caste institutions, hospitals, schools, hostels, publications, all rapidly developed. Caste consciousness was also fostered by the Decennial Returns of the Census of India. The Census Report recorded an extraordinary revival of caste spirit.8 7 The Depressed Oass representatives appeared before all the government· reform bodies from 1919 onwards: the Southborough Committee on Franchise, the Simon Commission, the Round Table Conferences and tte Franchise Committee in 1932. Twenty Depressed Oasses organisations, without any leadership from the caste Hindus, in their representations to the Statutory Commission, almost without exaly of giving certain members of the Depressed Classes two votes is abanduntly justified by the urgent need of securing that their claims should be effectively expressed and the prospect of improving their actual condition promoted. 119 ''For it would be obvious'', continued Hoare, ''that if the Depressed Classes were only given reserved seats in general electorates in which caste Hindu predominates, there would be little likelihood under the existing circumstances that the majority of the Depressed Class candidates elected would be other than mere nominees of the Caste Hindus''.1 20 Thus the Imperial strategy right from 1919 was a veiled encouragement towards caste separatism nearly in the same way as they had created divisions among the Hindus and Muslims and institutionalised that division by conceding separate electorates to the Muslims earlier. As David Page pointed out: ''With each stage of devolution'' Indians were set against Indians caste against caste ........ ''. 121 R. J. Moore also argued that keeping in line with their policy announced m 1917, the British played their communal card in the 1930's in such a way as to ,place the Congress which formed till then the national platform of the Indian democratic movement in a tight comer and then prepare for the next stage of