117 95 56MB
English Pages [357] Year 2019
IAA Reports, No. 65
Ashqelon Barne‘a The Early Bronze Age Site Volume I The Excavations Amir Golani
With contributions by
Oren Ackermann, Avner Ayalon, Mira Bar-Matthews, Gabriela Bijovsky, Elisabetta Boaretto, Eriola Jakoel and Mechael Osband
ISRAEL ANTIQUITIES AUTHORITY JERUSALEM 2019
IAA Reports Publications of the Israel Antiquities Authority Editors-in-Chief: Judith Ben-Michael, Zvi Greenhut Series Editors: Ann Roshwalb Hurowitz, Shelley Sadeh Volume Editor: Ayelet Hashahar Malka Production Editor: Shelley Sadeh Production Coordinator: Lori Lender Front Cover: The southern part of the site, with the developing city of Ashqelon in the distance (photographer: Jimmy Kdoshim) Back Cover: Circular mudbrick granary; a pithos sunken in a floor; a concentration of small votive pots in a pit (photographer: Amir Golani) Cover Design and Production: Ann Buchnick-Abuhav Layout and Typesetting: Ann Buchnick-Abuhav Illustrations: Natalya Zak, Elizabeth Belashov, Einav Drimer, Ira Brin Printing: Ayalon Printing, Jerusalem Copyright © 2019, The Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem POB 586, Jerusalem, 91004 ISBN 978-965-406-707-2 EISBN 978-965-406-708-9 www.antiquities.org.il
To my children, Tal and Sivan, the future is yours
Contents
ABBREVIATIONS
vi
FOREWORD
vii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Amir Golani
CHAPTER 2: THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING, GEOARCHAEOLOGY AND SEDIMENTOLOGY
Oren Ackermann, Mechael Osband, Mira Bar-Matthews and Avner Ayalon
17
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Amir Golani
37
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
Amir Golani
249
APPENDIX 1: RADIOCARBON DATING OF ARCHAEOBOTANICAL SAMPLES
Elisabetta Boaretto
271
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS Introduction Area C The Pottery The Coins An Inscribed Ring APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
1
275 Amir Golani Amir Golani Amir Golani Gabriela Bijovsky Eriola Jakoel Amir Golani
275 275 278 281 282
285
vi
Abbreviations
AB II Ashkelon 1
ASOR BAR Int. S. BASOR ESI HA–ESI IEJ IJES INJ INR JAS JMA JSOT LA NEAEHL OIP PEQ QR ZDPV
A. Golani. Ashqelon Barne‘a; The Early Bronze Age Site II: The Finds and Conclusions (IAA Reports). Jerusalem. Forthcoming. L.E. Stager, J.D. Schloen and D.M. Master. Ashkelon 1: Introduction and Overview (1985–2006); Final Reports of the Leon Levy Expedition to Ashkelon. Winona Lake 2008 American Schools of Oriental Research British Archaeological Reports (International Series) Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research Excavations and Surveys in Israel Ḥadashot Arkheologiyot––Excavations and Surveys in Israel (from 1999) Israel Exploration Journal Israel Journal of Earth Sciences Israel Numismatic Journal Israel Numismatic Research Journal of Archaeological Science Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Liber Annuus E. Stern and A. Lewinson-Gilboa eds. The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land 1–4. Jerusalem 1993 Oriental Institute Publications Palestine Exploration Quarterly Quaternary Research Zeitschrift des Deutchen Palästina-Vereins
vii
Foreword
The modern city of Ashqelon has been undergoing extensive expansion in recent decades. The Barne‘a neighborhood was constructed on the northern outskirts of Ashqelon during the 1960s. The present excavations were carried out in 2004–2005 prior to the addition of two new neighborhoods, Barne‘a B and C (map ref. 159650–622800/159900–623250). The site is located approximately 350 m east of the modern shoreline and lies on the southeastern slope of a low sandstone (kurkar) ridge that runs northeast–southwest, parallel to the coast. Portions of this ridge were still evident at the time of excavation, but today the entire area has been leveled by modern construction and remnants of the original topography can only be seen to the north, beyond the present-day city limits. Three excavation seasons were conducted at the Early Bronze Age site of Ashqelon Barne‘a during 2004 and 2005, directed by Amir Golani on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authority (Permit Nos. A-4177, A-4378, A-4558) and funded by the Ashkelon Economic Company Ltd. This excavation was the first to be undertaken in this vicinity and, as the entire site was destined for destruction due to modern development, it was also the last. The immense quantity of data retrieved from this excavation is an important contribution to the research and understanding of the Early Bronze Age in the southern Levant. This is the first of two volumes that comprise the final report of the three excavation seasons. The present volume focuses primarily on the stratigraphy and architecture. Chapter 1 briefly describes the siteʼs physical characteristics, paleoenvironment and subsistence strategies, previous research at the site, excavation strategy and methodology; Chapter 2 presents the geomorphology of the site and its environs, and a sedimentological analysis of the various strata; Chapter 3 details the siteʼs stratigraphy; Chapter 4 is a synthesis and comprehensive discussion of the stratigraphy, architecture and elements of settlement planning. The results of radiocarbon analyses are briefly summarized in Appendix 1. Very limited architectural remains and other finds of the Byzantine period are presented in Appendix 2. Appendix 3 contains the locus and wall lists. The second volume (AB II) will present and discuss the pottery repertoire (Amir Golani and Svetlana Talis), including a petrographic analysis (Anat Cohen-Weinberger); the flint assemblage (Mae Goder-Goldberger); the groundstone assemblage (Danny Rosenberg); the metal objects (Amir Golani); the worked-bone tools (Gaëlle Le Dosseur); the small finds (Amir Golani); human skeletal remains and mortuary practices (Yossi Nagar); the faunal assemblage (Anuar Zidane and Guy Bar-Oz); the fish remains (Omri Lernau); the mollusks (Inbar Ktalav) and the archaeobotanical remains (Ehud Weiss and Yael MahlerSlasky). A comprehensive summary of all the data from the Early Bronze Age excavations, incorporating both the architecture and the finds, will appear at the end of AB II.
viii
The scope of the excavations, the processing of the finds, and the tremendous amount of work involved in bringing the results to full scientific publication required years of toil, and was made possible by numerous individuals. The area supervisors are presented here in alphabetical order: Emil Aladjem (Areas D, K), Davida Dagan (Area A), Miki Ein Gedy (Areas I, J, L), Alexander Fraiberg (Areas D, E), Natalia Govchenko (Area H), Alexander Krokhmalnik (Areas D, E, F), Nir-Shimshon Paran (Areas A, C, G), Ilan Peretz (Areas C, M) and Svetlana Talis (Area B). General registration, ceramic processing and computerized data entry was carried out by Svetlana Talis. Logistic administration of the excavation was conducted by Emil Aladjem, Haim Lavi, Ra‘ed Abu-Halaf and Yoram Haimi. The field survey was performed by Vadim Essman and Viatcheslav Pirsky, and final plans and sections were prepared by Elizabeth Belashov, Ira Brin, Einav Drimer and Natalia Zak. Field and aerial photography was carried out by Amir Golani, Tsila Sagiv and the late Jimmy Kdoshim.1 Artifacts were drawn by Mani Goodman and photographed by Clara Amit. During excavation, Oren Ackermann studied geomorphological aspects of the site and Yossi Nagar investigated the human osteological remains in the field. Conservation, restoration and processing of the data were carried out by Yosef Bukengolts (pottery restoration), Oded Raviv (stone conservation), Lena Kupershmidt (metal conservation) and Emil Aladjem and Richard Fletcher (GIS studies). The project was assisted by Pirhiya Nahshoni and Yigal Israel (district archaeologists) and Dov Nahlieli (regional archaeologist). Liat Weinblum and Orit Aflalo helped organize the student volunteers who assisted in the third excavation season. The excavation was carried out by workers from Ashqelon and Qiryat Gat, with the assistance of Ashqelon schoolchildren and volunteers from the Nachshon pre-military program at Netiv Ha-Lamed-He. We would also like to acknowledge Yitzhak Paz, for his careful reading of the manuscript and numerous helpful comments, and the various anonymous readers. Our thanks go to all of the above and to others too numerous to mention here. Last but certainly not least, I would like to thank the many individuals in the publication department: Judith Ben-Michael, Ann Buchnick-Abuhav, Zvi Greenhut, Ayelet Hashahar Malka, Lori Lender, Hagar Maimon, Ann Roshwalb Hurowitz and Shelley Sadeh, without whom the publication of the excavation would never have become a reality.
Amir Golani Jerusalem 2019
In May of 2008, Jimmy Kdoshim was killed next to his home in Kibbutz Kefar ‘Azza in a terrorist attack. We all lament his tragic death and cherish his dedication and high-quality aerial photography. May his memory be blessed. 1
A. Golani, 2019, Ashqelon Barne a The Early Bronze Age Site I (IAA Reports 65)
Chapter 1
I ntroduction Amir Golani
The site of Ashqelon Barne‘a is part of a much larger Early Bronze Age I site that extends from the tell in the south, includes the marina and the Afridar neighborhood of the modern city of Ashqelon, and now reaches the northern neighborhood known as Barne‘a B–C (Fig. 1.1; see p. 6). The EB I site of Ashqelon is located on the southern coastal plain, which reaches c. 20 km wide in this region and is bordered on the east by the Judean Shephelah. Originally, this part of the coastal plain was characterized by two sandstone (kurkar) ridges extending northeast–southwest, parallel to the modern coastline, with a broad, shallow trough between them (see Chapter 2). These kurkar ridges are the remains of fossilized sand dunes of the Pleistocene era and represent higher ancient sea levels. The site was located on the moderate, southeastern slope of the westernmost ridge and partially within the western side of the trough, thus providing some measure of protection from the westerly winds. The system of southern coastal troughs was characterized by permanent agricultural settlements that exploited this ecological niche. The fertile red ḥamra and alluvial soils, high water table and varied flora and fauna provided a self-contained ecosystem conducive to permanent subsistence agriculture during EB I (Gophna 1997), as well as in earlier periods (Noy 1977; Liphschitz and Biger 1990). This was in contrast to contemporaneous settlements in the troughs of the Sharon coastal plain, which appear to have been more transient in nature, with a meager subsistence economy (Gophna 1974, 1977, 1997:159; Gophna and Portugali 1988). In recent millennia, these coastal troughs in the southern coastal plain were largely covered by sand dunes that deeply buried many protohistoric sites. Accelerated modern development in recent times has often led to the removal of this sand cover and the subsequent exposure of these ancient settlements.
The Local Paleoenvironment Site at Ashqelon
and
Subsistence Strategies
of the
EB I
The excavations at Ashqelon Barne‘a yielded one of the largest assemblages of archaeobotanical, faunal, fish and malacological finds recovered from an EB I site in the southern Levant. Together with the geomorphological study (Chapter 2), these enable a better understanding of the potential resources and the subsistence pattern of the ancient settlement. The following discussion presents a brief overview of the paleoenvironment of the ancient settlement.
2
161 000
160 000
159 000
624 000
158 000
156 000
157 000
AMIR GOLANI
Mediterranean Sea 623 000
623 000
Barne‘a
622 000
622 000
621 000
ya ay
t.
aS
hb
Ha
ok
-Ṭ
Afridar
r-K
621 000
Ba
sim
St.
Marina
620 000
Yitzhak Rabin Blvd.
620 000
619 000
Tel Ashqelon
Ben Gurion Blvd.
618 000
619 000
618 000
EB IA EB IB 160 000
159 000
158 000
km 157 000
1 156 000
155 000
0
617 000
Fig. 1.1. Excavated EB I sites in the vicinity of Ashqelon.
Climate The climate of this region today is typically Mediterranean with mild rainy winters and dry summers; the mean annual rainfall of 350 mm is concentrated between the months of November and February, while the mean annual temperature ranges between 19º and 21º C with extremes of 26º to 28º C in the summer and 12º to 24º in the winter (Kadmon 1956: Maps 1/IV, 2/IV; Koucky 2008). However, paleoclimatic research of the southern Levant shows that a moister climate prevailed during the Early Bronze Age (Rosen 1989). Recent research has pinpointed EB II–III as a period in which the southern Levant received a substantially greater amount of precipitation than today, creating marshlands on
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
3
the coastal plain that may have led to its abandonment at this time (see Chapter 2; Faust and Ashkenazy 2007). Only toward the end of that period did the more arid, present-day climatic conditions become prevalent (Goldberg and Bar Yosef 1982:404). Hydrology In the Ashqelon region, a high water table enabled easy access to fresh water that could have been obtained by digging wells (Gophna and Liphschitz 1996:145; Nir 2008), a technology known in the southern Levant since the Neolithic period (Galili 1993; Garfinkel 2006). Several wells are known in the vicinity, such as the Byzantine well in Area D of the present excavation (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.18: Section 8–8)1 and Bir Shuqeir, of unclear date, located 600 m north of the site (Berman and Barda 2005:21*, Site 1). The high water table in the ancient coastal troughs, which also produced seasonal ponds and wetlands (Gophna 1997:155),2 is partly due to the presence of an ancient underground river that flowed into a large salt lake 15 million years ago. Sand from the Nile River effectively buried this prehistoric river channel, located approximately 20 m below the modern surface, which still carries freshwater from the eastern Judean Shephelah to the Ashqelon region (Stager 1993:103; Stager and Schloen 2008:3). Phyto-Geography Ashqelon is situated at the southern extremity of the Mediterranean phyto-geographic zone, near the border with the Irano-Turanian and the Saharo-Arabian phyto-geographic zones (Kadmon 1956: Map 1/VI; Orni and Efrat 1976:164–177). Today’s vegetation is primarily Saharo-Arabian, and includes marram grass (Ammophila littoralis), white broom (Retama raetam) and carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). The massive formation of sand dunes that covered the troughs beginning sometime in the Roman–Byzantine period (see Chapter 2), severely altered the natural vegetative cover; thus, our knowledge of the native climax vegetation in the Early Bronze Age is only partial. Excavations at EB I sites throughout the Ashqelon littoral have uncovered remains of lentisk (Pistacia lentiscus), terebinth (Pistacia palaestina), tamarisk (Tamarix aphylla), shrubby salt bush (Atriplex halimus) and acacia (Acacia raddiana; see Liphschitz 2004; Weiss and Mahler-Slasky, forthcoming). Potential Subsistence Strategies at EB I Ashqelon Archaeobotanical remains of cultivated species from the EB I site of Ashqelon include cereals and legumes such as emmer wheat, barley and lentils, as well as fruits such as grapes and figs (Weiss and Mahler-Slasky, forthcoming), indicating that local agriculture within the troughs was providing the inhabitants with a subsistence economy, perhaps
This may be the well that appears on the British Mandate map of Ascalon North, see British Mandate map, Sheet 10/12, 1: 20,000 series first printed in 1931. 1
A historical source from the first century CE mentions a large, deep, freshwater pond near Ashqelon (Diodorus Siculus 2:4[II]). Guérin also mentions a large, deep pool south of Ashqelon (Weiss and Kislev 2004:10–11), although the exact location of both of these ponds (possibly the same one?) is unknown. 2
4
AMIR GOLANI
even surpluses. This is indirectly attested throughout the EB I site of Ashqelon, as well as at other sites of this period throughout the southern Levant, by the numerous storage installations that were apparently intended for public as well as private household storage (Golani and Yannai 2016). The discovery of emmer wheat spikelet forks indicating hulling in specific places at the site (Weiss and Mahler-Slasky, forthcoming), reveals that cereal crops were locally grown and brought into the settlement for processing and redistribution. The processing of these crops is further indicated by the large number of flint sickle blades exhibiting sheen (Goder-Goldberger, forthcoming) and the stone grinding and pounding tools recovered in the excavations (Rosenberg, forthcoming). Furthermore, the presence of numerous olive pits and charred olive wood (Olea europaea), common finds in both the Ashqelon Afridar and Ashqelon Barne‘a excavations (Liphschitz 2004; Weiss and MahlerSlasky, forthcoming), alludes to the intensive cultivation of olive trees in the immediate vicinity, probably for the production of olive oil. In fact, olive wood accounts for over 90% of all the wood remains examined from EB I sites in the Ashqelon region (Gophna and Liphschitz 1996:146; Liphschitz 2004; Weiss and Mahler-Slasky, forthcoming). The discovery of grape pips (Vitis vinifera) in the present excavations (see Weiss and MahlerSlasky, forthcoming), as well as at several other EB I sites in neighboring regions, such as Niẓẓanim and Taur Ikhbeineh (Gophna 1997:160), may attest to the cultivation of grapes for wine. Wine as well as olive oil and other foodstuffs produced at Ashqelon were possibly destined for export to Egypt by overland or maritime trade (Gophna and Liphschitz 1996; Gophna 2002b; Liphschitz 2004). Alongside horticulture, animal husbandry played an important role in the subsistence economy of the local inhabitants of EB I Ashqelon and indicates the establishment of a self-sustaining, yet market-oriented production economy. The faunal assemblage is one of the largest investigated to date (Zidane and Bar-Oz, forthcoming) and joins a growing number of archaeozoological studies carried out on finds from other excavations at the EB I site (Whitcher 1999; Whitcher-Kansa 2004; Sade 2008; Pines, forthcoming; TurgemanYaffe, forthcoming). The fauna is dominated by sheep and goat that were slaughtered at maturity, demonstrating exploitation of livestock for their secondary products such as milk and wool (Zidane and Bar-Oz, forthcoming). Sheep were generally found to outnumber goats, probably reflecting environmental constraints. The assemblages also included cattle and pig, the former reflecting a growing dependence on draft power, the latter increasing meat yields for local consumption, both requiring a nearby water source. Furthermore, a significant representation of domestic donkey, which served for traction as well as for transport, reflects the growing importance of trade, one of the main characteristics of late EB I. Game animals provided a minor supplement to the economy and are present in low frequencies. The site’s location near the seashore offered the potential for exploitation of maritime resources. The excavations have produced the largest assemblages of fish bones and mollusks yet studied from stratified deposits of EB I (Lernau, forthcoming; Ktalav, forthcoming), both of which provided supplementary dietary nutrition.
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
5
The Coastal Location of Ashqelon—An Entrepot for M aritime and Overland Trade Ashqelon is located on ancient and historical trade routes that probably existed as early as EB I (Gophna 2002b); for example, it lay along the southern portion of the western branch of the Via Maris,3 a major international north–south route that led from Damascus in the north and continued south along the coast to Egypt. During the Egyptian New Kingdom, Ashqelon served as a way station on this southern portion of the overland caravan route between Canaan and Egypt, known then as the ʻWay of Horusʼ (Aharoni 1967:41–45). While today the Ashqelon coastline is covered with sand dunes that hinder direct access to the seashore, in the past, a wide opening in the dunes at Ashqelon facilitated passage from inland regions to the coast (Aharoni 1967:44), thus making it a convenient location for a maritime anchorage and an entrepot for overland trade. Nilotic shells found within a typical EB I juglet off the coast of ‘Atlit have provided evidence for maritime trade with Egypt along the Mediterranean coast in this period (Sharvit et al. 2002) and such shells have been found in the present excavation as well (Ktalav, forthcoming). The discovery of Lebanon cedar and Turkish oak from the northern Levant at other sites in Ashqelon (Liphschitz 2004), as well as Egyptian ceramics and flint tools in the present excavation (Golani and Talis, forthcoming; Goder-Goldberger, forthcoming), suggest the existence of both maritime and overland trade. The latter is also expressed by the high frequency of domesticated donkey remains in the faunal assemblages of both Barne‘a and Afridar (Zidane and Bar-Oz, forthcoming; see also Milevsky and Horwitz 2019). Donkeys were most likely exploited as transport animals in the thriving trade network that was a major component in Ashqelon’s economy, and their increased role in EB I in relation to the previous Chalcolithic period can be regarded as a defining characteristic of EB I. Other items among the finds that probably arrived by overland trade include semi-processed copper, which apparently originated in Feinan, Jordan (Segal, Halicz and Kamenski 2004; Golani 2014b), and numerous groundstone vessels of non-indigenous basalt (Rosenberg and Golani 2012; Rosenberg, forthcoming). The seeming prosperity of the Ashqelon inhabitants was probably a result of its role as a trade nexus for the processing of copper into tools (see Chapter 4; Golani 2014b). In summary, the physical environment along the Ashqelon littoral enabled the inhabitants of the EB I settlement to develop a complex and broad-based subsistence strategy. Some of the inhabitants specialized in local agricultural activities, some specialized in sheep and goat pastoralism, some were fishermen, while others were involved in metallurgy and trade. The ensuing wealth from the metallurgical industry and surplus production of food crops apparently attracted a large volume of prestige products to the EB I community at Ashqelon.
For a different location of the Via Maris, see Rainey 1981:146–148.
3
6
AMIR GOLANI
The Archaeological R emains in the Ashqelon R egion and Their Exposure Research on the Early Bronze Age Settlement at Ashqelon Ashqelon is one of the largest and most extensively excavated EB I occupation sites in the southern Levant. Since 1990, intensified development of the modern city has become the impetus for rescue excavations and extensive mechanical test trenching, the majority carried out by the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA). These have revealed a large and sporadic settlement spread out from Tel Ashqelon in the south to the Barne‘a neighborhood in the north, and from the seashore to approximately 1 km inland (see Fig. 1.1). The EB I occupation is composed of numerous non-nucleated patches separated by large open areas where no archaeological remains were found4 and may be seen as comprising a single settlement of long duration, wherein the foci of settlement shifted over time. Among the various excavation areas, some revealed remains of one occupational stratum, while others revealed up to six, all of which are associated by their material culture to EB I (Table 1.1). The site was first probed in 1968, when Ram Gophna exposed massive mudbrick building remains of the late EB I (EB IB) in the Afridar neighborhood (Gophna 2002a; later designated as Area A). Since then, numerous rescue projects (see Table 1.1; Fig. 1.2) have demonstrated a continuous settlement that existed throughout the entirety of EB I, from the beginning of EB IA to the very end of EB IB. Although all the excavations at Afridar are apparently to be regarded as relating to one site, each was treated as a separate excavation area that was processed, analyzed and published individually;5 in the meantime, several syntheses have been produced (e.g., Golani and Segal 2002; Golani and Nagar 2011; Rosenberg and Golani 2012; Golani 2013, 2014b, forthcoming a). During the 1980s, excavations at Tel Ashqelon, located on the coast southwest of Afridar, unearthed ceramic evidence for occupation as early as EB IA (Stager 1993:105– 106). Further excavations in 2015 in the central portion of the tell revealed pits full of EB IA ceramics (Daniel Master and Joshua Walton, pers. comm. 2015). Sherds of the Chalcolithic and/or EB I were also reported in a small trench dug with mechanical equipment south of the tell (Rosen 2008:103). In 2018, a large, multi-layered occupation site dating to the Late Chalcolithic (Ghassulian) period was revealed in excavations in the newly developing Agammim neighborhood, c. 3 km southeast of the tell (Abadi-Reiss and Varga 2019).
However, it should be noted that the ‘open spaces’ are essentially where mechanical trenching was not able to discern any ancient occupational remains. As these were often covered by a very thick overburden of sand dunes (see Chapter 2), and the maximum depth to which the mechanical backhoe could reach from the modern ground surface is c. 4 m, any remains below this depth would not be exposed. 4
Previous excavations in the immediate region of the marina were often termed ‘Ashqelon Marinaʼ, while those slightly farther to the east were termed ‘Ashqelon Afridarʼ. As these excavations are all part of the same site, the general designation of Ashqelon Afridar is now preferred. 5
7 158 800
158 600
158 400
158 200
158 000
157 800
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Mediterranean Sea
621 600
621 600
Area L
Delilah Beach
621 400
’im h ir yo
Area G Area H
621 200
Area K
ay
ya
sim
Ye fe
St.
No
fS
t.
621 200
Ha -S
Area A Area B
S t.
Ha -Ẓ an ḥ
t.
Go lan iS
Area C
an im
St .
Marina
na
621 400
Bar-Kokhba St.
621 000
Ha
-Ṭ
621 000
Blv
d
Area E-3
Area E-2
Area P
t.
620 800
Area M
Area O Area N
620 600
Modi‘in S
th A
Area 10
Sou
Area D (E-4)
620 800
frica
Area E-1
Carmel St.
Area J
620 600
Area F
620 400
620 400
Fig. 1.2. The excavation areas at the EB I site of Ashqelon Afridar.
158 800
158 600
158 400
158 200
200 m 158 000
157 800
0
8
AMIR GOLANI
Prior to the present excavations at Ashqelon Barne‘a B–C, the existence of an Early Bronze Age occupation here was unknown. During the 1960s, roadwork in this vicinity involved large-scale earth-moving activities,6 yet no Early Bronze Age remains were noted, probably because the road system was installed directly upon the overlying sands. Archaeological surveys of the Barne‘a site prior to 2003, undertaken by the IAA (Berman and Barda 2005) and the Leon Levy Expedition to Ashkelon (Allen 2008), revealed primarily Byzantine remains. Excavations conducted by Yoram Haimi and Ilan Peretz of the IAA between 2002 and 2015 within the Ashqelon Barne‘a neighborhood, less than 1 km to the south of the present excavations, revealed remarkably preserved remains of the Hellenistic and Persian periods (Haimi 2008; Peretz 2017). With the resumption of development at Barne‘a B–C in 2003, the old road infrastructure was dismantled and much of the sand dunes were removed. Rescue excavations on the kurkar ridge in the area immediately to the southwest of the present excavation site (Fig. 1.3; Milevski et al. 2018) revealed remains of a Byzantine occupation. Following the present excavations in the Barne‘a neighborhood, it is now evident that the EB IA non-nucleated settlement revealed at Afridar extended from Barne‘a in the north all the way to Tel Ashqelon in the south; in EB IB, the settlement expanded in size at Barne‘a but decreased at Afridar (see Fig. 1.1). Within a 10 km radius from the site of Barne‘a, archaeological surveys have revealed scatters of EB I potsherds and flints in the sand, perhaps indicating other small settlements during this period (Berman, Stark and Barda 2004:30* [Site 136], 33* [Site 51], 46*, 53*, 60* [Sites 121, 159, 198]; Berman and Barda 2005:60*, 62*–64* [Sites 118, 132, 137]); 6 km to the northeast is the well-known EB IA site near Niẓẓanim (Yekutieli and Gophna 1994). Modern Development of the Ashqelon Barne‘a Site and Formulation of Excavation Strategy As noted above, mechanical removal of the sand dunes was carried out during municipal development in 2003, which cleared away large portions of the Byzantine occupation and exposed a compact, dark brown-gray layer containing architectural remains and EB I ceramics. The earth-moving operations obliterated large portions of the southern part of the Early Bronze Age site, and some at the northern end (Fig. 1.3). At the same time, large quantities of sand were dumped to the east of the kurkar ridge and on its southeastern slope, thus effectively filling in the remainder of the trough and leveling the area. With the discovery of the Early Bronze Age site by IAA inspectors, the pace of development was restricted, yet continued under archaeological supervision. As construction at the site could not be completely halted, it was decided that a major archaeological project would be undertaken to rescue data from a large part of the area destined for destruction. Protracted negotiations with the Ashkelon Economic Company Ltd., along with budgetary and legal restraints, precluded formulation of a comprehensive excavation strategy; instead,
These roads appear on the 1:50,000 scale topographical maps of this region just to the north of modern Ashqelon. 6
9
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Table 1.2. Summary of Excavations at the Early Bronze Age Site of Ashqelon Excavation
Main Features
Afridar Area A*
Early EB I (EB IA)
Late EB I (EB IB)
References
Architectural remains
EB IB
Gophna 2002a, 2004
Afridar Area B*
Mechanical test probes
EB IB
Gophna 2002a, 2004
Afridar Area C*
Remains of large, massive mudbrick structure
EB IB
Brandl and Gophna 1994; Gophna 2002a
Afridar Area D ( E-4)
Pits
EB IA
Gophna 2002a, 2004; Wallach 2003
Afridar Area E
Area E-1—pits Area E-2—pits, architectural remains, metallurgical activity, burials Area E-3—pits
EB IA
E-1: Golani 2004, 2018 E-2: Golani 2004, Golani and Paran 2014; Golani and Paran, forthcoming E-3: Golani 2004
Afridar Area F
Stratum II—pits Stratum I—architectural remains
Stratum II: early EB IA Stratum I: late EB IA
Khalaily 2004
Afridar Area G
Stratum II—architectural remains, burials Stratum I—architectural remains
Strata II–I: early EB IA
Braun and Gophna 2004
Afridar Area H
No finds
Afridar Area I
Designation not used
Afridar Area J
Stratum VI—pits, architectural remains, metallurgical activity, pottery kiln Stratum V—pits, architectural remains, metallurgical activity, hearths Stratum IV—pits, hearths, architectural remains Stratum III—pits, metallurgical activity Stratum II—architectural remains Stratum I—architectural remains
Strata VI–IV: EB IA
Strata III–I: EB IB
Baumgarten 2004
Afridar Area K
Architectural remains
EB I
EB I
Baumgarten 2006; Haimi 2009
Afridar Area L
Pits (identified by excavators as ‘Late Chalcolithic’)
EB IA
Garfinkel 1999, 2008
Afridar Area M
Stratum II—architectural remains, metallurgical activity Stratum I—architectural remains, metallurgical activity, burial
EB IA
Golani 2008b
Afridar Area N
Stratum II—architectural remains Stratum I—architectural remains
EB IA
Golani 2014a; forthcoming b
Afridar Area O
Area O-1, Stratum III—habitational debris Area O-1, Stratum II—architectural remains Area O-2—pits, architectural remains
EB IA
Paran 2014; Golani and Pasternak, forthcoming
Afridar Area P
Pits
EB IA
Golani 2017
Afridar Area 10
Pits, architectural remains, metallurgical activity
EB IA
Unpublished: Yuval Yekutieli and Nir-Shimshon Paran, BenGurion University
Barne‘a
Stratum IV—pits, architectural remains, metallurgical activity, burials Stratum III—pits, architectural remains, metallurgical activity, burials Stratum II—pits, architectural remains, metallurgical activity, burials
Stratum IV: late EB IA/EB IA–B transition
Stratum III: early EB IB; Stratum II: late EB IB
Golani 2005, 2007, 2008a
Delilah Beach*
Pits, metallurgical activity
EB I
EB I
Toueg 2010
Tel Ashqelon
Pits (central portion of tell)
EB IA
Braun and Gophna 2004
Daniel Master and Joshua Walton, pers. comm. 2015
* The locations of the excavations in Afridar Areas A, B and C, and the excavations at Delilah Beach, were not recorded in sufficient detail and are therefore approximate in Fig. 1.2.
10
AMIR GOLANI
the project was designed according to the developer’s immediate needs and financial capabilities. The rescue excavations were thus conducted in three stages that took place over three seasons. In the first stage, a survey defined the area of the Early Bronze Age site as encompassing approximately 54 dunams, then a trial excavation was conducted during June–July 2004 within the area of the site along the path of the projected roads of the future neighborhood (Golani 2005: Fig. 1). This excavation probed the nature and depth of the finds to aid in developing a future excavation strategy. Six separate areas (A–F) were opened where ancient remains were visible on the surface. Three main EB I occupation strata (IV–II) were identified in most of the excavated areas. In the second stage, during February–May 2005, excavation concentrated on exposure of the remains in the southern third of the site (Golani 2007). Areas D and E were greatly expanded, and Area G was opened. In addition, mechanical trenching was carried out in the northern two-thirds of the site to determine the northern, eastern and western boundaries of the ancient settlement and the depth of the occupation buildup (Golani 2007: Fig. 1). The strategy for the third stage of excavations, carried out during August–December 2005, was based on the results of the first two seasons (Golani 2008a). As it was not possible to fully expose the northern two-thirds of the site (nearly 40 dunams), a viable strategy was conceived, composed of four principal elements (Fig. 1.3): 1. A north–south section, 15 m wide, through the central portion of the site (Areas H, M), which would connect Areas A and B; 2. An east–west section (Area L) connecting to the eastern side of the north–south section; 3. Expansion of either section upon exposure of any significant architectural remains (Areas I, K); 4. Limited excavation on the periphery of the EB I site (Area J) and beyond (Area C). Excavation Methodology Prior to excavation, a grid was set up on a southwest–northeast axis. For Areas A, B, H, K and M, the excavation grid shared letter/number designations as all these areas were physically linked within the context of the north–south and east–west sections excavated through the site. As Areas C, D, E, F, G, I, J and L were not physically connected to any other excavation area, each was assigned its own grid numbering (Fig. 1.3).7 After mechanical equipment removed the remainder of the upper sand layers that had already been disturbed, excavation then proceeded manually. Debris originating from habitation surfaces and surface make-ups was sifted through a 1 × 1 cm wire mesh. All the ceramics, flints, bones, metal fragments, shells and botanical samples were collected and later sorted. Locus numbers comprise three, or more often four digits, and basket numbers five digits. The first digit of the locus and basket usually indicates the area; e.g., all the
Although Area I was physically linked to Area H, it was assigned a different grid as it was opened toward the end of the excavation. 7
11 159 950
159 900 avid
Buz
aglo
St
159 800
159 700
159 600
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
623 200
av D
623 200
HaR
Area J
Area A
Area C Area I
Area H
623 100
Area M
Area B
623 100
Area L
Area K Early Bronze Age site
Area F 623 000 Destroyed area of the site
Area D
Area G
Byzantine site
Reḥ
avam
Ze’e
St
622 900
623 000
t
HaR av D avid
Buz
aglo
Milevski et al. 2018
622 900
vi S
Area E
622 800
622 800
Byzantine settlement Full extent of EB I settlement Destroyed area of the site
159 950
159 800
Fig. 1.3. The excavation areas at Ashqelon Barne‘a.
159 900
Section in western sand dune (WSD)
50 m 159 700
159 600
0
12
AMIR GOLANI
loci and baskets of Area G begin with the number ʻ8ʼ. Each basket was treated as a threedimensional ʻmini-locusʼ, and as such, the same basket number was assigned to the pottery, flints, bones, shells and other finds. In the stratigraphic description (Chapter 3), a distinction is made between a ʻbuildingʼ and a ʻstructureʼ. A building is defined as an enclosed space with a clear plan, or one that can be reasonably reconstructed as such, while a structure is defined as a group of architectural elements of unclear plan whose reconstruction is not possible or highly conjectural. A distinction is also made between ʻfloorsʼ and ʻsurfacesʼ. A floor is defined as the accumulation directly upon a habitation level within a clearly defined and roofed area such as a room, or within an area that may be reconstructed as such. On the other hand, a surface is defined as an accumulation in an open area, or a living level associated with a wall or walls that do not form a reasonably clear plan. When the debris directly upon a floor or surface could be distinguished from the composition of the floor/surface itself (the make-up), the two locus numbers are presented together with the higher element first; for example: L128/L3016 represents Floor Accumulation 128 over Floor Make-up 3016.
R eferences Abadi-Reiss Y. and Varga D. 2019. Inter-Site Complexity in the Ghassulian Chalcolithic Site of Agamim, Ashqelon. In D. Varga, Y. Abadi-Reiss, G. Lehmann and D. Vainstub eds. Worship and Burial in the Shfela and the Negev Regions throughout the Ages (Proceedings of the 15th Annual Southern Congress). Be’er Sheva‘. Pp. 67–78 (Hebrew). Aharoni Y. 1967. The Land of the Bible: A Historical Geography. Philadelphia. Allen M. 2008. Regional Archaeological Survey. In Ashkelon 1. Pp. 21–65. Baumgarten Y.Y. 2004. An Excavation at Ashqelon, Afridar—Area J. ‘Atiqot 45:161–184. Baumgarten Y. 2006. Ashqelon. HA–ESI 118 (July 6). http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_ Detail_Eng.aspx?id=374&mag_id=111 (accessed November 26, 2009). Berman A. and Barda L. 2005. Map of Niẓẓanim–West (87), Niẓẓanim-East (88) (Archaeological Survey of Israel). Jerusalem. Berman A., Stark H. and Barda L. 2004. Map of Ziqim (91) (Archaeological Survey of Israel). Jerusalem. Brandl B. and Gophna R. 1994. Ashqelon, Afridar. ESI 12:89. Braun E. and Gophna R. 2004. Excavations at Ashqelon, Afridar—Area G. ‘Atiqot 45:185–241. Diodorus Siculus. Bibliotheca Historica. C.H. Oldfather ed. and transl. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass. 1993. Faust A. and Ashkenazy Y. 2007. Excess in Precipitation as a Cause for Settlement Decline along the Israeli Coastal Plain during the Third Millennium BC. QR 68:37–44. Galili E. 1993. The Submerged Pre-Pottery Neolithic Water Well of Atlit-Yam, Northern Israel, and Its Palaeoenvironmental Implications. The Holocene 3:265–270. Garfinkel Y. 1999. Neolithic Site of Ashkelon (Afridar Area L), 1997, 1998. IEJ 49:141–143.
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
13
Garfinkel Y. 2006. The Domestication of Water: The Neolithic Well at Sha‘ar Hagolan, Jordan Valley, Israel. Antiquity 80:686–697. Garfinkel Y. 2008. Layer III: Late Chalcolithic Remains. In Y. Garfinkel and D. Dag. Neolithic Ashkelon (Qedem 47). Jerusalem. Pp. 310–314. Garfinkel Y. and Dag D. 2008. Neolithic Ashkelon (Qedem 47). Jerusalem. Goder-Goldberger M. Forthcoming. The Flint Assemblages. In AB II. Golani A. 2004. Salvage Excavations at the Early Bronze Age Site of Ashqelon, Afridar—Area E. ‘Atiqot 45:9–62. Golani A. 2005. Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C. HA–ESI 117 (March 28). http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/ Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=134&mag_id=110 (accessed January 27, 2008). Golani A. 2007. Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C. HA–ESI 119 (June 11). http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/ Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=533&mag_id=112 (accessed January 27, 2008). Golani A. 2008a. Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C. HA–ESI 120 (June 5). http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/ Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=805&mag_id=114 (accessed December 10, 2008). Golani A. 2008b. The Early Bronze Age Site of Ashqelon, Afridar—Area M. ‘Atiqot 60:19–51. Golani A. 2013. The Transition from the Late Chalcolithic to the Early Bronze I in Southwestern Canaan––Ashqelon as a Case for Continuity. In E. Braun and V. Roux eds. The Transition Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant (Paléorient 39/1). Paris. Pp. 95–110. Golani A. 2014a. Ashqelon, Afridar Area N: Preliminary Report. HA–ESI 126 (December 31). http:// www.hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=13680&mag_id=121 (accessed March 8, 2016). Golani A. 2014b. Ashqelon during the EB I Period––A Centre for Copper Processing and Trade. In A. Mączyńska ed. The Nile Delta as a Centre of Cultural Interactions between Upper Egypt and the Southern Levant in the 4th Millennium BC (Proceedings of the Conference Held in the Poznań Archaeological Museum, Poznań, Poland 21–22 June 2012) (Studies in African Archaeology 13). Poznań. Pp. 119–137. Golani A. 2017. Ashqelon. HA–ESI 129 (December 16). http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_ Detail_Eng.aspx?id=25352&mag_id=125 (accessed January 28, 2018). Golani A. 2018. Ashqelon. HA–ESI 130 (May 28). http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_Detail_ Eng.aspx?id=25425&mag_id=126 (accessed February 10, 2019). Golani A. Forthcoming a. The Late Chalcolithic/Early Bronze I Transition in Southwestern Canaan and the Ashqelon Occupational Sequence. In M.J. Adams, V. Roux and F. Höflmayer eds. Transitions during the Early Bronze Age in the Levant: Methodological Problems and Interpretive Perspectives (Proceedings of a Conference at the Albright Institute of Archaeological Research, Jerusalem, May 16–18 2018). Golani A. Forthcoming b. Rescue Excavations at the Early Bronze Site of Ashqelon Afridar––Area N. ‘Atiqot. Golani A. and Nagar Y. 2011. Newly Discovered Burials of the Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age I in Southern Canaan––Evidence of Cultural Continuity? In J.L. Lovell and Y.M. Rowan eds. Culture Chronology and the Chalcolithic: Theory and Transition (Levant Suppl. S. 9). Oxford–Oakville. Pp. 84–96.
14
AMIR GOLANI
Golani A. and Paran N.S. 2014. Ashqelon, Afridar Area E2. HA–ESI 126 (December 21). http:// www.hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=13679&mag_id=121 (accessed March 8, 2016). Golani A. and Paran N.S. Forthcoming. Rescue Excavations at the Early EB I Site of Ashqelon Afridar––Area E-2. ‘Atiqot. Golani A. and Pasternak M.D. Forthcoming. Ashqelon Afridar––Area O. HA–ESI. Golani A. and Segal D. 2002. Redefining the Onset of the Early Bronze Age in Southern Canaan: New Evidence of 14C Dating from Ashkelon Afridar. In E.C.M. van den Brink and E. Yannai eds. In Quest of Ancient Settlements and Landscapes: Archaeological Studies in Honour of Ram Gophna. Tel Aviv. Pp. 135–154. Golani A. and Talis S. Forthcoming. The Ceramic Assemblages. In AB II. Golani A. and Yannai E. 2016. Storage Structures of the Late Early Bronze I in the Southern Levant and the Urbanisation Process. PEQ 148:8–41. Goldberg P. and Bar-Yosef O. 1982. Environmental and Archaeological Evidence for Climatic Changes in the Southern Levant. In J. Bintliff and W.J. Van Zeist eds. Palaeoclimates, Palaeoenvironments and Human Communities in the Eastern Mediterranean Region in Later Prehistory II (BAR Int. S. 133ii). Oxford. Pp. 399–414. Gophna R. 1974. The Settlement of the Coastal Plain of Eretz Israel during the Early Bronze Age. Ph.D. diss. Tel Aviv University. Tel Aviv (Hebrew; English summary, pp. V–XIII). Gophna R. 1977. Archaeological Survey in the Central Coastal Plain, 1977: Preliminary Report. Tel Aviv 5:136–147. Gophna R. 1997. The Southern Coastal Troughs as EB I Subsistence Areas. IEJ 47:155–161. Gophna R. 2002a. Afridar 1968: Soundings in an EB I Occupation of the “Erani C” Horizon. BeerSheva 15:129–137. Gophna R. 2002b. Elusive Anchorage Points along the Israel Littoral and the Egyptian-Canaanite Maritime Route during the Early Bronze Age I. In E.C.M. van den Brink and T.E. Levy eds. Egypt and the Levant: Interrelations from the 4th through the Early 3rd Millennium B.C.E. London–New York. Pp. 418–421. Gophna R. 2004. Excavations at Ashqelon, Afridar—Introduction. ‘Atiqot 45:1–8. Gophna R. and Liphschitz N. 1996. The Ashkelon Trough Settlements in the Early Bronze Age I: New Evidence of Maritime Trade. Tel Aviv 23:143–153. Gophna R. and Portugali Y. 1988. Settlement and Demographic Processes in Israel’s Coastal Plain from the Chalcolithic to the Middle Bronze Age. BASOR 269:11–28. Haimi Y. 2008. Ashqelon, Barne‘a. HA–ESI 120 (November 23). http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il/ Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=953&mag_id=114 (accessed November 26, 2009). Haimi Y. 2009. Ashqelon. HA–ESI 121 (June 28). http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_Detail_ Eng.aspx?id=1119&mag_id=115 (accessed November 26, 2009). Kadmon N. ed.1956. Israel Atlas. Jerusalem (Hebrew). Khalaily H. 2004. An Early Bronze Age Site at Ashqelon, Afridar—Area F. ‘Atiqot 45:121–159. Koucky F.L. 2008. Physical Environment. In Ashkelon 1. Pp. 11–15.
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
15
Ktalav I. Forthcoming. The Mollusks. In AB II. Lernau O. Forthcoming. The Fish Remains. In AB II. Liphschitz N. 2004. Archaeobotanical Remains from Ashqelon, Afridar. ‘Atiqot 45:305–310. Liphschitz N. and Biger G. 1990. Ancient Dominance of the Quercus Calliprinos–Pistacia Palaestina Association in Mediterranean Israel. Journal of Vegetation Science 1:67–70. Milevski I., Bijovsky G., Sandhaus D., Krokhmalnik A. and Gorin-Rosen Y. 2018. A Byzantine Settlement on the Northernmost Kurkar Ridge of Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C Neighborhood. ‘Atiqot 91:159–192. Milevski I. and Horwitz L.K. 2019. Domestication of the Donkey (Equus asinus) in the Southern Levant: Archaeozoology, Iconography and Economy. In R. Kowner, G. Bar-Oz, M. Biran, M. Shahar and G. Shelach-Lavi eds. Animals and Human Society in Asia—Historical, Cultural and Ethical Perspectives. London. Pp. 93–148. Nir Y. 2008. The Wells of Ashkelon. In Ashkelon 1. Pp. 105–106. Noy T. 1977. Neolithic Sites in the Western Coastal Plain. Eretz Israel 13:18–33 (Hebrew; English summary, pp. 290*–291*). Orni E. and Efrat E. 1976. Geography of Israel (3rd ed.). Jerusalem. Paran N.S. 2014. Ashqelon, Marina. HA–ESI 126 (December 31). http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/ Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=13693&mag_id=121 (accessed March 3, 2016). Peretz I. 2017. Ashqelon, Barne‘a. HA–ESI 129 (July 20) http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il/report_ detail_eng.aspx?id=25253&mag_id=125 (accessed December 11, 2019). Pines M. Forthcoming. Early EB I Faunal Remains. In A. Golani, Rescue Excavations at the Early Bronze Age Site of Ashqelon, Afridar—Area N. ‘Atiqot. Rainey A.F. 1981. Toponymic Problems. Tel Aviv 8:146–151. Rosen A.M. 1989. Environmental Change at the End of Early Bronze Age Palestine. In P. de Miroschedji ed. L’urbanisation de la Palestine à l’âge du bronze ancien: Bilans et perspectives des recherches actuelles (Actes du Colloque d’Emmaüs, 20–24 octobre 1986) II (BAR Int. S. 527ii). Oxford. Pp. 247–255. Rosen A.M. 2008. Site Formation. In Ashkelon 1. Pp. 101–104. Rosenberg D. Forthcoming. The Groundstone Assemblage. In AB II. Rosenberg D. and Golani A. 2012. Groundstone Tools of a Copper Smith’s Community: Understanding Stone-Related Aspects of the Early Bronze Age Site of Ashqelon Barnea. JMA 25:27–51. Sade M. 2008. The Archaeozoological Material. In A. Golani. The Early Bronze Age Site of Ashkelon, Afridar – Area M. ‘Atiqot 60:40–45. Segal I., Halicz L. and Kamenski A. 2004. The Metallurgical Remains from Ashqelon, Afridar‒– Areas E, G and H. ‘Atiqot 45:311–330. Sharvit J., Galili E., Rosen B. and Brink E.C.M. van den. 2002. Predynastic Maritime Traffic along the Carmel Coast of Israel: A Submerged Find from North ‘Atlit Bay. In E.C.M. van den Brink and E. Yannai eds. In Quest of Ancient Settlements and Landscapes: Archaeological Studies in Honour of Ram Gophna. Tel Aviv. Pp. 159–166.
16
AMIR GOLANI
Stager L.E. 1993. Ashkelon. NEAEHL. Pp. 103–112. Stager L.E. and Schloen J.D. 2008. Introduction: Ashkelon and Its Inhabitants. In Ashkelon 1. Pp. 3–10. Toueg R. 2010. Ashqelon. HA–ESI 122 (May 26). http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/Report_Detail_ Eng.aspx?id=1401&mag_id=117 (accessed March 3, 2016). Turgeman-Yaffe Z. Forthcoming. The Faunal Assemblage. In A. Golani and M.D. Pasternak, Ashqelon Afridar––Area O-2. HA–ESI. Wallach Z. 2003. Ashqelon (A). HA–ESI 115:58*–59*. Weiss E. and Kislev M.E. 2004. Plant Remains as Indicators for Economic Activity: A Case Study from Iron Age Ashkelon. JAS 31:1–13. Weiss E. and Mahler-Slasky Y. Forthcoming. The Archaeobotanical Remains. In AB II. Whitcher S. 1999. Animals, Environment and Society: A Zooarchaeological Approach to the Late Chalcolithic–Early Bronze I Transition in the Southern Levant. Ph.D. diss. University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh. Whitcher-Kansa S. 2004. Animal Exploitation at Early Bronze Age Ashqelon, Afridar: What Bones Tell Us—Initial Analysis of the Animal Bones from Areas E, F and G. ‘Atiqot 45:279–297. Yekutieli Y. and Gophna R. 1994. Excavations at an Early Bronze Age Site near Nizzanim. Tel Aviv 21:162–185. Zidane A. and Bar-Oz G. Forthcoming. The Faunal Assemblages. In AB II.
A. Golani, 2019, Ashqelon Barne a The Early Bronze Age Site I (IAA Reports 65)
Chapter 2
The Geographical Setting, Geoarchaeology and Sedimentology Oren Ackermann, Mechael Osband, Mira Bar-Matthews and Avner Ayalon1 Introduction The site of Ashqelon Barne‘a is located in the southern part of the Israeli coastal plain (also known as Pleshet; Fig. 2.1). The coastal plain region is comprised of a series of elongated, subparallel, aeolian sandstone (kurkar) ridges (Fig. 2.2; Tsoar 2000). The westernmost ridge forms a cliff by the sea that reaches a height of ~20 m in the study area, rising to ~50 m in the central (Sharon) coastal plain. In between the ridges are low depressions known as troughs (also termed slacks; Gvirtzman, Netser and Katsav 1998; Almagor 2005; Zilberman et al. 2006) wherein soils accumulated from the adjacent slopes of the kurkar ridges. These ridges and troughs are composed of kurkar sandstone, usually intercalated with layers of red sandy clay loam (ḥamra) and dark clayey soils (Dan, Fine and Lavee 2007; Singer 2007). The kurkar ridges are cut by a few natural channels that drain water from the hills and central mountains to the west (Fig. 2.2), depositing fine-grained alluvial sediments in their path. The archaeological site of Ashqelon is adjacent to the seashore, where the high water table likely provided favorable conditions for ancient settlement (Koucky 2008; Nir 2008). However, during periods of increased rainfall, such as at the beginning of the third millennium BCE, the high water table combined with the geomorphological structure of alternating ridges and troughs and a minimal number of natural drainage channels, would have led to poor drainage conditions, creating a swamp-like environment (Cohen-Seffer et al. 2005; Faust and Ashkenazy 2007, 2009). The general geological structure of the westernmost kurkar ridge in the Ashqelon region is comprised of four geological members or sediment units, described here from top to bottom (Gvirtzman, Netser and Katsav 1998; Porat, Wintle and Ritte 2004; Almagor 2005; Zilberman et al. 2006).
Oren Ackermann, Israel Heritage Department and the Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology, Ariel University; Mechael Osband, University of Haifa, Zinman Institute of Archaeology, Department of Land of Israel Studies, and Ohalo College; Mira Bar-Matthews and Avner Ayalon; Department of Geochemistry, Geological Survey of Israel. The authors would like to thank Ezra Zilberman of the Geological Survey of Israel, and Pinchas Fine of the Department of Soil Chemistry, Plant Nutrition and Microbiology at the Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, for the many fruitful discussions. The authors would also like to thank Amir Golani for his encouragement in conducting this study. 1
18
OREN ACKERMANN, MECHAEL OSBAND, MIRA BAR-MATTHEWS AND AVNER AYALON
Sea of Galilee
Haifa Mediterranean Sea
Ashqelon Barne‘a Tel Ashqelon 0
ain nt l M ou ra nt Ce
h la he
Sh
ep
Pl
es
he t Co ast a
Gane Ha-Ta‘arukha Tel Aviv
Sha l P ron lai n
s
‘En Esur
Jerusalem
Soreq Cave Dead Sea
40 km
Fig. 2.1. General map and location of sites and regions mentioned in the text.
The Ḥadera Sand Member The youngest member comprises fine, unconsolidated aeolian sand that invaded the coastal plain in an event that began ~2000 years ago (BP) and intensified ~1500 years BP, during the Byzantine period. This is evident from many archaeological sites along the coastal plain, dated from the Hellenistic period onward, which were covered by this member (e.g., at Gan Soreq, see, ‘Ad and Dagot 2006), or were found within it, such as the Byzantine occupation in the Ashqelon region. The Ḥadera Member was active into the twentieth century, when it began to stabilize. Due to intensive contemporary sand mining and construction, this member today remains visible in only a few areas (Zilberman et al. 2006). The Ta‛arukha Member This member consists of fine, unconsolidated yellow-brown aeolian sand (Gvirtzman and Wieder 2001). The sands are interspersed with undeveloped soil horizons (regosols) characterized by initial pedogenetic processes, including carbonatic sediments and
200 000
190 000
180 000
170 000
160 000
150 000
130 000
140 000
CHAPTER 2: THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING, GEOARCHAEOLOGY AND SEDIMENTOLOGY
N.
710 000
N. Ḥ
710 000
ade
Mediterranean Sea
700 000
qan Bar
ra
700 000
N. Al der exan
Netanya
690 000
690 000
N. Po
leg 680 000
680 000
n arqo N. Y
670 000
670 000
Tel Aviv 660 000
660 000
N. A yyal
on
650 000
650 000
640 000
N.
Ashdod
640 000
So
req
N. L
630 000
sh
akhi
630 000
620 000
620 000
Ashqelon
610 000
610 000
a N. Shiqm
Gaza
600 000
600 000
N. Si
Aeolian (kurkar) ridges
lqa N.
10 km 200 000
180 000
170 000
0 160 000
150 000
140 000
580 000
130 000
or
Bes
Holocene dune sands
190 000
590 000
590 000
580 000
Fig. 2.2. Map of the kurkar ridges, Holocene sand dunes and drainage system along the central and southern coastal plain of Israel (Tsoar 2000: Fig. 1; Courtesy of Israel Science Journals).
19
20
OREN ACKERMANN, MECHAEL OSBAND, MIRA BAR-MATTHEWS AND AVNER AYALON
relatively darker colored soil horizons (grumosols). Its formation began ~5500 years BP, in the middle of the Holocene. Many archaeological sites in the central and southern coastal plain lie within this member (Gvirtzman and Wieder 2001). At Ashqelon, this member comprised the basal dune upon which the EB I occupation was founded. The Dor Kurkar Member This member is comprised of fine sand cemented by carbonates and is characterized by a fine-bedded structure. Its formation began 53.1 + 4.3 ka BP and ended 50.7 + 4.2 ka BP (Porat, Wintle and Ritte 2004). This member appears along a large part of the westernmost kurkar ridge and formed most of the western cliff along the coast. The Naḥsholim Sandy Regosol Member This unit, found at the bottom of the western cliff directly below the Dor Kurkar Member, comprises fine brown sand and silt with terrestrial land snails and is rich in carbonate deposition. Its formation began 57.3 + 3 ka BP and ended 47.9 + 4.2 ka BP (Porat, Wintle and Ritte 2004). In summary, the structure of alternating kurkar, sandy soils (regosol, ḥamra) and sand dunes is a result of cyclical aeolian Nilotic sand accumulation and sedimentation. Intensive accumulation resulted in sand-dune evolution, while non-intensive accumulation resulted in stabilized sand dunes and subsequent pedogenetic processes (Gvirtzman and Wieder 2001; Porat, Wintle and Ritte 2004).
Goals and Methodology The main goal of this study was to reconstruct the paleoenvironment of the coastal plain area during the late Holocene, specifically in the vicinity of the Ashqelon Barne‘a archaeological site during EB I. To this end, a geoarchaeological/sedimentological study was conducted in order to characterize the environmental and sedimentological conditions that were present during the Early Bronze Age. Our field survey investigated two representative sections within the environs of the study site (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3): a section located at the western edge of the trough in southern Area H (Section D16; Fig. 2.3; see Chapter 3: Plan 3.3: Section 1–1) and a section in the western kurkar ridge that was cut by a bulldozer, just east of Area J (Section WSD; Fig. 2.6; see Chapter 3: Plan 3.33). Sedimentology and soil stratigraphy of the section profiles were classified in the field according to color, general texture and structure (Tables 2.1, 2.2). Age assessment and the presence of human activity associated with the units were determined by correlation to the archaeological stratigraphy, embedded pottery sherds and 14C dating of charcoal remains (see Appendix 1). Soil/sediment texture is the physical property with the greatest influence on porosity, water infiltration rate and fertility. Texture is the relative percentage of fine material particles 10%). The presence of alternating units of sand and soil in Section WSD is evidence of periodic cycles with a high rate of aeolian sand accumulation in Units 1, 3 and 4, in contrast to stable periods that enabled soil pedogenesis in Units 2 and 5. Unit 2 was formed during the Early Bronze Age, which was apparently characterized by stable conditions and minimal aeolian processes. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and δ13C values The TOC values are highest in Unit 1 of the Byzantine period with 0.18% C. The TOC amounts decrease with depth, with Units 2, 3 and 4 containing values of 0.15%, 0.06% and 0.07% respectively. A reverse tendency is observed in Unit 5, which has a value of 0.25% (Fig. 2.8). The d13C data show a general trend of decreasing values with depth, from -28.8 ‰ in Unit 1 to -33.13‰ in Unit 5. Assuming that microbial degradation could account for only 1–2‰ variations in these values (see Appendix below), they reflect the long-term input of C3 and C4 plants (see, e.g., Kelly et al. 1991b). Therefore, we can assume that the decrease in d13C values reflects an increase in the relative amount of the C3 component in the organic matter.
100 90 80 70 60 % 50 40 30 20 10 0 1
10
100
1000
10000
Size (mic)
Unit 1, Byz
Unit 2, EB IB
Unit 4
Unit 5
Unit 3
Fig 2.7. Cumulative grain fraction-size percentages, Section WSD.
28
OREN ACKERMANN, MECHAEL OSBAND, MIRA BAR-MATTHEWS AND AVNER AYALON δ13C (0/00 VPDB) -36
34
-32
-30
TOC
Unit 1 (Byz)
-28
δ13C
Unit 2 (EB IB)
Unit 3 (EB IA–IB)
4
5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
TOC (%)
Fig 2.8. Comparison of total organic carbon (TOC) and δ13C between EB I and Byzantine units in Section D16 and Section WSD.
Sediment Comparison: Section D16 and Section WSD Fraction Size The fraction size of the sediments from the various units of the two sections was compared by plotting the data on sand as opposed to clay (Fig. 2.9). The results identified three main clusters relating to fraction size within the sediments: 1. Section WSD, Unit 1 (Byzantine), Units 4 and 5 (both pre-settlement). As Unit 3 appears to represent the uppermost part of the basal sand dune, the small number of sherds identified in its upper portion may be intrusive from Unit 2. 2. Section D16, Unit 5 (EB IA–IB, Stratum IV); Section WSD, Unit 2 (EB IB, Stratum III). 3. Section D16, Units 2–4 (EB IB, Strata III–II); Section WSD, Unit 5 (pre-settlement). The texture of the sediments in all units is sandy in general, and a general trend of an increase in silt and clay content is evident in Section D16 (in the trough), 13–23%, from bottom to top respectively (see Fig. 2.4). Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and δ13C Comparison The Early Bronze Age units in Section D16 have higher TOC and lower d13C values (see Fig. 2.5) in comparison with the values in EB IB Unit 2 of Section WSD. The TOC results likely reflect a denser vegetation distribution in the trough than on the kurkar ridge sand
CHAPTER 2: THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING, GEOARCHAEOLOGY AND SEDIMENTOLOGY
29
100
Clay (%)
75
50
WSD-5 D16-2 D16-4 D16-3 D16-5
25
0
0
25
50
75
WSD-2 D16-4 WSD-1 WSD-3 100
Sand (%)
Fig 2.9. Sand content (%) vs. clay content (%) in the various units of Section D16 and Section WSD.
dune, while the d13C results appear to indicate that the vegetation grew in wetter conditions than prevailed in the vicinity of the kurkar ridge.
Discussion and Conclusions Advanced and detailed proxy climatic records based on the isotopic composition of the Soreq Cave speleothems (cave mineral sediments; Bar-Matthews, Ayalon and Kaufman 1998) and the water-level history of the Dead Sea (Frumkin et al. 1991), indicate that during EB II–III, wetter climatic conditions and increased rainfall were prevalent in comparison to EB I. From the present field study, it is evident that the vicinity of the site underwent periodic cycles of sand accumulation and sand stabilization. During the Early Bronze Age, sand-dune stabilization and subsequent pedogenetic processes took place, as revealed from the regosol in Unit 2 of Section WSD. Concurrently, hydromorphic soil formed in the trough (Section D16), indicating the presence of wetland conditions in the lower topographic location (Section D16, Unit 2). The vegetation in the trough was denser than on the nearby kurkar ridge, as indicated by relatively higher TOC values and relatively lower d13C values. Dense vegetation acts as a dust trap that enriches the sediments with fine clay and silt (Danin et al. 1989). This may explain the higher clay content in the trough units (Units 2–5, Section D16) throughout the EB I as compared to Unit 2 in Section WSD. The absence
30
OREN ACKERMANN, MECHAEL OSBAND, MIRA BAR-MATTHEWS AND AVNER AYALON
of clayey sediments in the kurkar ridge may be due to its relatively higher topography and thus greater distance from the water table, resulting in sparser vegetation. These finds correlate with the sand-dune stabilization in the Ta‘arukha Member in the central coastal plain during the Early Bronze Age (~4.6–5 ka BP), identified by Gvirtzman and Wieder (2001). The relatively wetter conditions would have resulted in a high water table, providing the inhabitants of the site with fresh water from springs and permanent or seasonal water bodies such as freshwater ponds within the trough, or from the digging of shallow pits (Nir 2008). The availability of water could have certainly been a contributing factor in the initial settlement of the site at the beginning of the Early Bronze Age. However, continued wetter conditions may have also eventually contributed to creation of marshlands, which may explain two phenomena observed at the site: (1) the area of the Stratum II settlement was smaller than that of Stratum III (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3); (2) in Stratum II, mudbrick walls were nearly always based on kurkar-stone foundations, whereas in Stratum III the mudbrick walls were usually laid directly on the sandy surface (see Chapter 3). The creation of marshlands probably caused the bases of the walls to be wet and unstable, and the ancient inhabitants may have tried to stabilize their walls by constructing them on kurkar foundations. However, despite these efforts, the site was eventually deserted at the end of EB IB. The phenomenon of marshland creation or wetland expansion during the late EB I has been identified at other sites along the coastal plain (see Fig. 2.1), such as Gane HaTa‘arukha (Tel Aviv exhibition grounds) in the central coastal plain, where a clay level likely caused by wetland formation was identified covering an EB II site (Ritter-Kaplan 1984).5 The palynological remains from that site revealed a high frequency of oak (Quercus sp.) and sedge (Cyperaceae). In the northern coastal plain, similar clayey units evidencing wetland conditions, as seen in manganese concretions, were identified at the site of ‘En Esur (‘Ein Asawir), in a transitional layer between late EB I and the Intermediate Bronze Age levels (Yannai and Ackermann, pers. comm., 2008). The observation of wetland expansion at ‘En Esur during this period is supported by palynological remains indicating an increased presence of wetland vegetation, from 47.8% during the early Chalcolithic period to 91.7% toward the very end of EB I (Horowitz 2006). Here also, the abandonment of the site at the end of EB I or the beginning of EB II is attributed to the expansion of wetlands (Yannai 2002; Horowitz 2006). In a wide-ranging study by Faust and Ashkenazy (2007, 2009), it is suggested that wetland expansion was the main cause of the dramatic reduction in settlement all along
Although a dark and compacted clayey layer was found to override strata of EB I and EB II at the site (Ritter-Kaplan 1984:3), renewed examination of the ceramics by Yitzhak Paz does not appear to indicate an EB II occupation, and the material in question is more probably to be dated to EB IB. The authors wish to thank Yitzhak Paz for this clarification. 5
CHAPTER 2: THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING, GEOARCHAEOLOGY AND SEDIMENTOLOGY
31
the coast during EB II–III. In contrast, a dramatic increase in settlement was noted in areas such as the northern Negev and the Shephelah (Migowski et al. 2006). It seems that the final Early Bronze Age occupation level at Ashqelon Barne‘a lay exposed until the end of the Roman–beginning of the Byzantine period, as indicated by the uppermost unit of the kurkar ridge (probably of the Ḥadera Member) that contained Byzantine sherds (Section WSD: Unit 1), as well as in the trough (Section D16: Unit 1). This correlates with our knowledge of widespread sand-dune cover along the coastal plain during the Byzantine period (see, e.g., Barzilay 2004; ‘Ad and Dagot 2006), when the landscape began to assume its current form.
Appendix: A Detailed Description of the δ13c Analysis Carbon isotopes yield paleoecological information as the carbon in the soil carbonate forms in isotopic equilibrium with local soil CO2, whose isotopic composition is determined by local plant cover. Many studies indicate that soil organic carbon inherits the isotopic signature of the plant residue (reflecting the parent C3–C4 ratio) plus the isotopic fractionation occurring during decomposition, resulting in higher (or lower) d13C values with time and depth. Thus, the relative proportions of C3 and C4 vegetation at a site reflect climatic conditions: C3 vegetation is generally associated with moister and cooler climates, resulting in soil components with higher d13C values, whereas C4 plants are generally associated with drier and warmer conditions. Thus, the relative proportions of C3 and C4 plants provide an opportunity to assess the long-term changes in an ecosystem (Dzurec et al. 1985). Differences in plant physiology (e.g., water use efficiency, depth of rooting) and environmental conditions during photosynthesis (water availability, light intensity, altitude and other factors) affect the isotopic composition (e.g., Vogel 1980; Farquhar, OʼLeary and Berry 1982; Ehleringer 1988; Farquhar, Ehleringer and Hubick 1989; O’Leary 1995; Heaton 1999). At high temperatures and/or under conditions of water stress, C4 plants are more photosynthetically efficient than C3 plants. Lower temperatures and higher soil moisture favor C3 vegetation (Ehleringer et al. 1991; Tissue et al. 1995). Plant d13C values and temperature are positively correlated, whereas a negative correlation is present between d13C values and water availability. There is a tendency in C3 plants with high water-use efficiency to be rich in 13C. Water stress results in some stomatal closure that, with irradiance still high, results in decreased discrimination against 13C and the d13C value becomes more positive (Tieszen 1991). The 13C-enrichment (or depletion) at depth is due to a preferential loss of the 12C (or 13C) during organic matter decomposition (see, e.g., Stout, Rafter and Troughton 1975; Dzurec et al. 1985; Natelhoffer and Fry 1988; Balesdent, Girardin and Mariotti 1993; Connin, Virginia and Chamberlain 1997). This diagenetic change is explained by different decay rates of components with differing d13C, a preferential microbial utilization of 12C in preference to 13C, and differential preservation of organic matter or plant litter components, leading to isotopic fractionation.
32
OREN ACKERMANN, MECHAEL OSBAND, MIRA BAR-MATTHEWS AND AVNER AYALON
However, many studies have shown that d13C fractionation is usually in the range of 1–2‰ (and no more than 2–3‰; e.g., Stout, Rafter and Troughton 1975; Natelhoffer and Fry 1988; Kelly et al. 1991a; Kelly, Yonker and Marino 1993). Therefore, it is unlikely that processes of post-depositional decomposition of organic matter have affected the carbonisotope trends observed here, and the isotopic variations can be referred to changes in the relative proportions of C3 and C4 plants. Thus, the isotopic composition of the measured d13C of the SOM should reflect the input of the parent C3 and C4 plants, and the carbon isotopic composition of the SOM can therefore be used as a tracer of the parent vegetation.
R eferences ‘Ad U. and Dagot A. 2006. Gan Soreq (South). HA–ESI 118 (March 1). http://www.hadashot-esi. org.il/Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=323&mag_id=111 (accessed February 3, 2008). Almagor G. 2005. The Mediterranean Coast of Israel (Geological Survey of Israel Report GSI/13/022). Jerusalem (Hebrew). Balesdent J., Girardin C. and Mariotti A. 1993. Site-Related δ13C of Tree Leaves and Soil Organic Matter in a Temperate Forest. Ecology 74:1713–1721. Balesdent J., Mariotti A. and Boisgontier D. 1990. Effect of Tillage on Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization Estimated from 13C Abundance in Maize Fields. Journal of Soil Science 41:587– 596. Bar-Matthews M., Ayalon A. and Kaufman A. 1998. Middle to Late Holocene (6,500 Yr. Period) Paleoclimate in the Eastern Mediterranean Region from Stable Isotopic Composition of Speleothems from Soreq Cave, Israel. In A.S. Issar and N. Brown eds. Water, Environment and Society in Times of Climate Change. Dordrecht–Boston–London. Pp. 203–214. Barzilay E. 2004. The Geological and Geomorphologial Setting of the Early Bronze Age Site at Ashqelon, Afridar. ‘Atiqot 45:331–335. Bender M.M. 1968. Mass Spectrometric Studies of Carbon 13 Variations in Corn and Other Grasses. Radiocarbon 10 (2):468–472. Cai D.-L., Tan F.C. and Edmond J.M. 1988. Sources and Transport of Particulate Organic Carbon in the Amazon River and Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 26:1–14. Cohen-Seffer R., Greenbaum N., Sivan D., Jull T., Barmeir E., Croitoru S. and Inbar M. 2005. Late Pleistocene–Holocene Marsh Episodes along the Carmel Coast, Israel. Quaternary International 140–141:103–120. Connin S.L., Virginia R.A. and Chamberlain C.P. 1997. Carbon Isotopes Reveal Soil Organic Matter Dynamics following Arid Land Shrub Expansion. Oecologia 110:374–386. Coplen T.B. 1994. Reporting of Stable Hydrogen, Carbon and Oxygen Isotopic Abundances (Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry 66:273–276. Dan J., Fine P. and Lavee H. 2007. The Soils of the Land of Israel. Tel Aviv (Hebrew). Danin A., Bar-Or Y., Dor I. and Yisraeli T. 1989. The Role of Cyanobacteria in Stabilization of Sand Dunes in Southern Israel. Ecologia Mediterranea 15:55–64.
CHAPTER 2: THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING, GEOARCHAEOLOGY AND SEDIMENTOLOGY
33
Deines P. 1980. The Isotopic Composition of Reduced Organic Carbon. In P. Fritz and J.C. Fontes eds. Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry 1: The Terrestrial Environment. Amsterdam. Pp. 329–406. Dzurec R.S., Boutton T.W., Caldwell M.M. and Smith B.N. 1985. Carbon Isotope Ratios of Soil Organic Matter and Their Use in Assessing Community Composition Changes in Curlew Valley, Utah. Oecologia 66:17–24. Ehleringer J.R. 1988. Carbon Isotope Ratios and Physiological Processes in Arid Land Plants. In P.W. Rundel, J.R. Ehleringer and K.A. Nagy eds. Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research (Ecological Studies 68). New York–London. Pp. 41–54. Ehleringer J.R. and Cooper T.A. 1986. Correlation between Carbon Isotope Ratio and Microhabitat in Desert Plants. Oecologia 76:562–566. Ehleringer J.R., Sage R.F., Flanagan L.B. and Pearcy R.W. 1991. Climate Change and the Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:95–99. Farquhar G.D., Ehleringer J.R. and Hubick K.T. 1989. Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40:503–537. Farquhar G.D., O’Leary M.H. and Berry J.A. 1982. On the Relationship between Carbon Isotope Discrimination and the Intercellular Carbon Dioxide Concentration in Leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 9:121–137. Faust A. and Ashkenazy Y. 2007. Excess in Precipitation as a Cause for Settlement Decline along the Israeli Coastal Plain during the Third Millennium BC. QR 68:37–44. Faust A. and Ashkenazy Y. 2009. Settlement Fluctuations and Environmental Changes in Israel’s Coastal Plain during the Early Bronze Age. Levant 41:19–39. Feng X., Peterson J.C., Quideau S.A., Virginia R.A., Graham R.C., Sonder L.J. and Chadwick O.A. 1999. Distribution, Accumulation and Fluxes of Soil Carbon in Four Monoculture Lysimeters at San Dimas Experimental Forest, California. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 63:1319–1333. Frumkin A., Magaritz M., Carmi I. and Zak I. 1991. The Holocene Climatic Record of the Salt Caves of Mount Sedom, Israel. The Holocene 1:191–200. Goldberg P. and Macphail R. 2006. Practical and Theoretical Geoarchaeology. Oxford. Gvirtzman G., Netser M. and Katsav E. 1998. Last-Glacial to Holocene Kurkar Ridges, Hamra Soils, and Dune Fields in the Coastal Belt of Central Israel. IJES 47:29–46. Gvirtzman G. and Wieder M. 2001. Climate of the Last 53,000 Years in the Eastern Mediterranean, Based on Soil-Sequence Stratigraphy in the Coastal Plain of Israel. Quaternary Science Reviews 20:1827–1849. Heaton T.H.E. 1999. Spatial, Species, and Temporal Variations in the 13C/12C Ratios of C3 Plants: Implications for Palaeodiet Studies. JAS 26:637–649. Horowitz A. 2006. Palynology at ‘En Esur: The Advance of Marshes as a Possible Cause for Settlement Desertion. In E. Yannai. ‘En Esur (‘Ein Asawir) I: Excavations at a Protohistoric Site in the Coastal Plain of Israel (IAA Reports 31). Jerusalem. Pp. 267–268. Huckleberry G. 2001. Archaeological Sediments in Dryland Alluvial Environments. In J.K. Stein and W.R. Farrand eds. Sediments in Archaeological Context. Salt Lake City. Pp. 67–92.
34
OREN ACKERMANN, MECHAEL OSBAND, MIRA BAR-MATTHEWS AND AVNER AYALON
Kelly E.F., Amundson R.G., Marino B.D. and De Niro M.J. 1991a. Stable Carbon Isotope Composition of Carbonate in Holocene Grassland Soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55:1651–1658. Kelly E.F., Amundson R.G., Marino B.D. and De Niro M.J. 1991b. Stable Isotope Ratios of Carbon in Phytoliths as a Quantitative Method of Monitoring Vegetation and Climate Change. QR 35:222–233. Kelly E.F., Yonker C.M. and Marino B.D. 1993. Stable Carbon Isotope Composition of Paleosols: An Application to Holocene. In P.K. Swart, K.C. Lohmann, J. McKenzie and S. Savin eds. Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records (American Geophysical Union, Geophysical Monograph 78). Washington, D.C. Pp. 233–239. Klute A. ed. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis (American Society of Agronomy Monograph 9, Part 1) (2nd ed.). Madison, Wisc. Koucky F.L. 2008. Physical Environment. In Ashkelon 1. Pp. 11–15. Migowski C., Stein M., Prasad S., Negendank J.F.W. and Agnon A. 2006. Holocene Climate Variability and Cultural Evolution in the Near East from the Dead Sea Sedimentary Record. QR 66:421–431. Natelhoffer K.J. and Fry B. 1988. Controls on Natural Nitrogen-15 and Carbon-13 Abundances in Forest Soil Organic Matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52:1633–1640. Nir Y. 2008. The Wells of Ashkelon. Ashkelon 1. Pp. 105–106. O’Leary M.H. 1995. Environmental Effects on Carbon Isotope Fractionation in Terrestrial Plants. In E. Wada, T. Yoneyama, M. Minigawa, T. Ando and B.D. Fry eds. Stable Isotopes in the Biosphere. Kyoto. Pp. 78–91. Porat N., Wintle A.G. and Ritte M. 2004. Mode and Timing of Kurkar and Hamra Formation, Central Coastal Plain, Israel. IJES 53:13–25. Ravikovitch S. 1950. The Brown Red Sandy Soils of the Sharon and the Shefela. K’tavim 1:1–39 (Hebrew). Reed S., Bailey N. and Onokpise O. 2000. Soil Science for Archaeologists. Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University and Southeast Archaeological Center, National Park Service, Washington. https://www.scribd.com/doc/3811962/Soil-Science-for-Archaeologists (accessed March 8, 2016). Ritter-Kaplan H. 1984. The Impact of Drought on Third Millennium B.C. Cultures on the Basis of Excavations in the Tel Aviv Exhibition Grounds. ZDPV 100:2–8. Singer A. 2007. The Soils of Israel. Berlin. Smith B.N. and Epstein S. 1971. Two Categories of 13C/12C Ratios for Plants. Plant Physiology 47:380–384. Stout J.D., Rafter T.A. and Troughton J.H. 1975. The Possible Significance of Isotopic Ratios in Palaeoecology. In R.P. Suggate, and M.M. Cresswell eds. Quaternary Studies (Selected Papers from IX INQUA Congress, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2–10 December 1973) (Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin 13). Wellington. Pp. 279–286. Tieszen L.L. 1991. Natural Variations in the Carbon Isotope Values of Plants: Implications for Archaeology, Ecology and Paleoecology. JAS 18:227–248.
CHAPTER 2: THE GEOGRAPHICAL SETTING, GEOARCHAEOLOGY AND SEDIMENTOLOGY
35
Tissue D.T., Griffin K.L., Thomas R.B. and Strain B.R. 1995. Effects of Low and Elevated CO2 on C3 and C4 Annuals. II. Photosynthesis and Leaf Biochemistry. Oecologia 101:21–28. Tsoar H. 2000. Geomorphology and Paleogeography of Sand Dunes that Have Formed the Kurkar Ridges in the Coastal Plain of Israel. IJES 49:189–196. Vogel J.C. 1980. Fractionation of the Carbon Isotopes during Photosynthesis (Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Jahrgang 3). Berlin. Pp. 111–135. Yannai E. 2002. The Northern Sharon in the Chalcolithic Period and the Beginning of the Early Bronze Age in Light of Excavations Results at ‘Ein Assawir. In E.C.M. van den Brink and E. Yannai eds. In Quest of Ancient Settlements and Landscapes: Archaeological Studies in Honour of Ram Gophna. Tel Aviv. Pp. 65–85. Zilberman E., Ilani S., Netser-Cohen H. and Calvo R. 2006. Geomorphologic-Lithologic Mapping along the Israel Coastline (Geological Survey of Israel Report GSI/22/2006). Jerusalem (Hebrew).
A. Golani, 2019, Ashqelon Barne a The Early Bronze Age Site I (IAA Reports 65)
Chapter 3
The Stratigraphy Amir Golani
I ntroduction In this chapter, a detailed stratigraphy of each area is presented, beginning with the contiguous areas in the north–south section that cuts through the site: Areas A, H, I, M, B and K, followed by Areas D and G to the southeast, then Areas L and J, and finally Areas E and F that lie outside the habitation site (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3). The distance between Areas E and F and the other excavation areas, and the near absence of diagnostic finds, made their stratigraphic association tenuous, although they are probably to be associated with the Early Bronze Age occupation at the site (see below). The remains in Area C, dated to the Byzantine period, are presented in Appendix 2. Within each area, the stratified remains are described from earliest to latest. Due to the size of the excavation and the necessity to present the most precise stratigraphy, this method was chosen over presentation of each stratum separately throughout the entire site. The first plan of each area is a composite of all the strata and phases within that area, including the sections, followed by separate plans for each stratum. Aside from the Byzantine remains in Stratum I, the bulk of the occupation falls within one general archaeological period—Early Bronze Age I (Strata V–II). As the ceramics exhibited no clear differences within the stratigraphic sequence, the strata in the various excavation areas were equated by means other than ceramic data, such as meticulous examination of the stratigraphic sections, the association of layers, surfaces and habitation levels, and the type of building materials, construction methods and architectural styles (see Chapter 4). While intra-site variation is to be expected as different types of activities were contemporaneous within the same site, characteristic features of each stratum could be perceived over most of the excavated areas. In general, five occupation strata were identified, although not all of them were necessarily discerned in each area (Table 3.1). Stratum V Dated to the late EB IA or EB IA–IB transition, this level was exposed in a limited number of deep probes below architectural features of Stratum IV in Areas B and D. No architecture was associated with this stratum. It was characterized by a small amount of ceramics and thin, poorly preserved layers that may possibly represent habitation surfaces, generally devoid of organic buildup, lying directly on and within the upper portion of the sterile basal
38
AMIR GOLANI
sand dune. These remains may represent an ephemeral campsite horizon or, more likely, a pre-construction leveling phase for the Stratum IV occupation; thus, the designation ‘Stratum V’ here is technical and used with caution. Stratum IV Also dated to late EB IA or EB IA–IB transition, this stratum comprised the first clear and permanent occupation at the site (c. 23.5 dunams; see Chapter 4: Fig. 4.1). Elements of this stratum were defined in Areas A, B, D, G, H, I, L and M. Stratum IV was distinguished by walled compounds and large, curvilinear buildings, separated by wide open spaces. Several mudbrick silos, subterranean storage facilities sunken deeply into the sands, were identified.1 The architecture of Stratum IV is characterized by the use of brown to orangebrown mudbricks with few inclusions. In Areas D and M, two localized building phases (IVB, IVA) were identified. Stratum III Dated to early–mid-EB IB, this stratum was identified in Areas A, B, D, E(?), G, H, I, J, K, L and M and represents the largest and most densely built settlement at the site (54 dunams: see Chapter 4: Fig. 4.2), consisting of walled compounds and buildings whose construction resembles that of Stratum IV. Some of the compounds included domestic structures, often alongside mudbrick storage facilities, while others appear to represent industrial compounds reserved primarily for metallurgical activities. The compounds were separated from one another by narrow alleys or open spaces. In most cases, the Stratum III structures completely replaced those of Stratum IV, although occasionally the earlier remains were reused. In contrast to Stratum IV, the Stratum III settlement was closely built up and numerous instances of architectural modifications were identified (Phases IIIB, IIIA). As Phase IIIA appears to have been a natural outgrowth and extension of Phase IIIB, both are attributed to the same stratum. The building materials of Stratum III differed from those of Stratum IV and included distinctive light brown-gray or cream-gray mudbricks made from the local sandy soil, with numerous calcite concretions. The storage facilities of Stratum III were mostly granaries, in contrast to the silos of Stratum IV. Stratum II Dated to the end of EB IB, this stratum represents a complete break in the settlement sequence. The Stratum III site was abandoned and resettled in Stratum II on a much smaller scale (c. 20 dunams; see Chapter 4: Fig. 4.3). Remains of Stratum II were identified in Areas A, D, H, I, J, K and L. This stratum produced poor architectural remains, usually found within a compacted, dark gray matrix characterized by the inclusion of numerous kurkar chips. Although infant and child burials were found within inhabited areas in Strata IV and III, a recurring feature of Stratum II was the presence of such burials within abandoned areas of the site (e.g., Areas B, J), often within walls of the Stratum III structures.
1
Above-ground facilities, even when partly subterranean, are labeled granaries.
39
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Stratum I This stratum consisted of sporadic remains, including pits and a well, from the Byzantine period that were found throughout the area of the abandoned Early Bronze Age site (Areas D, G, H), while limited architectural remains were identified atop the kurkar ridge facing the seashore in Area C (see Appendix 2). Numerous intrusions of large, artificial and natural ‘sand pockets’ containing limited quantities of Byzantine finds were also found throughout the excavated area, which often removed large segments of the EB I architecture and frequently even penetrated into the basal dune. These pockets could have been the remains of Byzantine pits or natural hollows, such as animal burrows, cutting into the Early Bronze Age strata, that were subsequently filled with sand including Byzantine remains. Table 3.1. General Stratigraphic Correlation, Areas A–M Stratum
Period
Area A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
I
Byzantine
-
-
+
+
?
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
II
EB IB
+
+*
-
+
?
?
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
III
EB IB
+
+
-
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
IV
EB IA–IB
+
+
-
+
?
?
+
+
+
?
+?
+
+
V
EB IA–IB
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
*Only burials
Area A (Plans 3.1, 3.2) Area A, at the northern end of the main north–south section that traverses the site, is situated on a moderate slope that descends toward the east, and as a result, the western squares are about 0.8 m higher than the eastern ones. The area was subdivided into two parts, north (Sqs E32–35) and south (Sqs B–E/27–31). The remains in the south were better preserved than those in the north, as modern leveling operations had not shaved away the archaeological strata to the same extent.2 Three archaeological strata (IV–II) were identified; Stratum III contains the majority of the extant architectural remains in this area. Stratum IV (Plan 3.1) Evidence of the earliest occupation, identified only in the southern portion of Area A, consisted of two silos built of orange-brown mudbricks dug into the top of the basal dune. These facilities were overlaid by Stratum III elements (Fig. 3.1).
During excavation, the work in southern Area A originally included seven more squares that are ascribed here to northern Area H (Sqs B–E26, B–D25). During the processing of data after the excavation, these squares were transferred to northern Area H as they were situated to the south and outside of the large building that comprised most of southern Area A. The remains in these squares are described in northern Area H, although the loci and wall designations used in their excavation are listed under those of Area A as they were a part of the consecutive locus and wall registers used in the recording of that field. 2
C
B
E
D
F
35
35
34
34 W5
Northern Area A
Structure A1 W1
33
33
32
32
31
31 W318
Southern Area A
Building A2
L3083 28.04
30
W316
W304
30
27.92
Burial
7
30
W
W301
28.01 27.98
W30
9
29
W305
W317
29
W303 27.89 L3022 27.76
27.60 27.10
W310
28.00 27.92 27.74 27.48 27.36
W7
W
5
W8 W7
W
2
11
27.57
1
2
27.38
27.56 27.55
27.74 27.67
27.82 27.77 27.65 27.60
W306
2
27
27.70 27.56
W6
W302
C
D
Stratum II
L3040 27.64
B
28
W310
L156
27.50
L3036
27.53
L3107
27.39
W310
W
27.40
L3101
27.48 27.14 27.42
27.57 25.80
L3095 27.19
31
28
1
27.02
27.64 27.60
Stratum III 5 m
0
E
Plan 3.1. Area A, composite plan, Strata IV–II and Sections 1-1, 2-2.
27
Stratum IV
F
41
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY 29 00
B27 W7
C27 W2
L116 L132
28 00
L115
L122
L133
W2
L110 L139 W11 L146
W11 L148 Basal dune
27 00
L156
L155
Fill 26 00
1-1
29 00
C27 W2
28 00
L154
L133
L122
L128
L152A
W11
L115
W2 W7
L141
W11 L151
L152B
L148
Fill
27 00
L150 Basal dune
Mud bricks 26 00
B27
Blocked entrance
Stones
2-2
Plan 3.1 (cont.). Area A, composite plan, Strata IV–II and Sections 1-1, 2-2.
W2
W11
Fig. 3.1. Stratum IV Silo 156 underlying Stratum III Granary 141, looking southwest.
L100 L107 L116 L132
42
AMIR GOLANI
Silo 156 The silo was circular (outer diam. 3 m, inner diam. 2.1 m), bounded by W11. It was constructed as a pit dug 1.77 m deep into the loose orange-yellow sand of the dune, after which a sloping mudbrick wall was built within, laid in two rows, often with mudbrick stretchers in between (see Plan 3.1: Section 1-1). A dark fill (L155) was then inserted into the space between the mudbrick wall and the sides of the pit, while the inner face of the wall was coated with a light gray plaster preserved only in the lower portion (Fig. 3.2). The silo, partially exposed, contained a fill of uniform, medium-brown debris (L156). Silo 3095 This silo, c. 5 m northeast of Silo 156, was also constructed as a pit, 0.58 m deep, dug into the sand dune, after which a mudbrick wall (W315) was constructed within the pit. The silo, apparently oval, was partially preserved (reconstructed with outer dimensions of 3.6 × 4.3 m, inner dimensions of 2.5 × 3.2 m; Fig. 3.3). In its northern portion, most of
2
W
W1 1
Fig. 3.2. Stratum IV Silo 156 with light gray plaster visible near the bottom.
W315
Fig. 3.3. Stratum IV Silo 3095, looking north.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
43
W315 was badly damaged by an intrusion filled with modern sand that had descended to the basal dune. However, cleaning of the section adjacent to the intrusion revealed that this wall descended at least six courses. In the silo, traces of a beaten-earth floor (L3095) with some paving stones appears to have sloped down toward the center, where another concentration of paving stones was exposed. To the south of the silo, a beaten-earth surface (L3036) that incorporated some small stones lay adjacent to the top of W315. East of the silo, another beaten-earth surface (L3101) may also be attributed to this occupation.
Stratum III (Plan 3.2) Northern Area A In the northern part of Area A, stone-built walls were visible on the modern surface prior to excavation. Excavation in and around these remains uncovered poorly preserved walls founded directly on the light yellow sand of the basal dune. These walls had been severely damaged by later artificial and natural sand pockets (Fig. 3.4). Structure A1 Fragmentary stone foundations (W1, W5) of a structure with at least one outer rounded corner were exposed. Only one course of these two walls was preserved, built of small to medium-sized kurkar stones arranged in two rows with smaller chinking stones in between. No associated floors were identified, yet a small amount of EB I pottery was found in the immediate vicinity. Due to their method of construction, these remains are probably to be associated with Stratum III.
Fig. 3.4. Northern Area A at the end of the excavations, looking west. Note the wall remains, disturbed by extensive later intrusions.
C
B
E
D
F
35
35
34
34 W5 28.22 28.01
28.11 27.90
28.17 28.00
Northern Area A
Structure A1 W1
33
33
28.07 27.86
27.98 27.88
32
32
31
31
27.90 27.96
Southern Area A
28.01
W318
L3045
Building A2
W304
30
L3035
28.09 27.90
27.95 27.90
28.02
28.06 27.89
L3014 28.18
27.98
W301
27.83 27.72
L3029
27.62 27.74 27.69
27.68
W8
28.31 27.81
27.95 28.02 27.91
W7
28.03 28 04
B
27.48
W6 27.90 27.97
C
27.79
L3018 W302 27.77
D
L3078
27.69
27.95 27.91
28
27.64
27.50 27.30
L3027
27.85 27.79
27.83
27.88 27.84
27.55 27.45
27.82 27.67
W310
L128 L154
W6 L130 28.25 L157 28.24 28.04
28.30 28.01
1 2
28.04
27.41 27.29
L3016
27.94
L116 L132
28.17 28.02
27.93 27.88
28.17 27.63
27.60
2
L3068
27.56
L139
W306
W
L141 L148
27.68 27.39
L3081
27.69
2
28.15 27.94
27.71 27.32
L3015 L3026
29
W310
W7
28.11 28.00
W2
28.32 27.85
1
27
28.06
27.57
27.72 27.59
W310
28.21 28.01
27.95 27.90
L139
28.04
28.09 28.02
28
28.08
L108 L117
L3041
27.64 27.61
L3043
27.90
28.12 28.04
W305
L3062
27.80
27.69 27.60
7
L3010
W317
W317
28.16 28.13
27.95 27.85
27.79
27.74 27.60
30
29
L3085
28.16 28.13
28.28 28.17
27.65 27.63
W
27.94 27.75
28.22 28.12
28.20 28.09
30
27.66
W316
27.95
L3057 L3089 27.51
Plan 3.2. Area A, Stratum III.
27
L3063 L3070
W302
27.65
27.56 27.39
27.72 27.53
E
27.48
5 m
0 F
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
45
Southern Area A The southern part of Area A in Stratum III was intensively utilized for dwelling in contrast to Stratum IV, when it was used only for storage. Prior to excavation, the outlines of several mudbrick walls were apparent on the surface, and thus work began with exposure of these elements and their immediate surroundings. Due to extensive disturbances, no physical connection was established between the northern and southern parts of Area A. The Compound The Stratum III remains consisted of a walled courtyard featuring a circular mudbrick structure apparently used for storage and a few partition walls, along with an adjoining domestic building (A2). These elements comprised a compound probably to be associated with a family whose domicile was next to a walled courtyard within which they stored and processed their foodstuffs. The compound opened to the south onto a wide, open space with another two compounds (Area H). The Courtyard. The largest element of the Stratum III compound was a walled courtyard (c. 165 sq m). The southern and eastern walls of the courtyard were relatively well preserved, while the western wall and large portions of the northern wall were missing. The walls were mostly built of mudbrick preserved up to one–three courses. The mudbrick walls were occasionally sided by small stones on both sides of the wall to provide more stability. Different techniques were used in various parts of the walls, and significant variations were observed in the width of each wall. These variables suggest different building stages or perhaps different builders, yet all four walls appear to have been part of one homogenous complex. The southern wall (W6–W302) included two entranceways and was relatively well preserved (Fig. 3.5). This wall appears to adjoin the western wall of the courtyard, W7, near one of the entrances. This latter wall was poorly preserved; nearly all its mudbrick superstructure was missing and the only remnants of the wall were a few intermittent stone lines with traces of a few mudbricks noted between the stones. The northern wall, W317, was built of three parallel rows of mudbrick and was traced for 2.5 m. Its western continuation, along with substantial portions of the architecture and associated surfaces, was completely missing. On the east, this wall abutted W301, the southern wall of the domestic building. Farther east, W301 appears to have adjoined W310, the eastern wall of the courtyard, in a rounded corner. Wall 310 joined W302 to the south in a rounded corner (Fig. 3.6). The main entranceway to the courtyard, in the center of the southern wall (W6– W302), opened onto an open space. Just inside this entrance was an area of about 18 sq m that was paved with long, narrow mudbricks (L128/154, L3016; see Plans 3.1: Section 2-2; 3.2). This pavement functioned as a small piazza, stretching from Granary 141 in the west (see below) to approximately 3 m north of the entrance. On the east it was delineated by W306, an inner partition wall perpendicular to W302, built of gray-brown mudbricks and preserved to one course high. A large concentration of crushed ceramics lay on the pavement (Fig. 3.7). West of W306 was a beaten-earth surface (L3027) that connected
46
AMIR GOLANI
W2 W11
W6
W302
W
30
2
Fig. 3.5. The southern part of the courtyard, looking north.
W310
Fig. 3.6. The eastern part of the courtyard, looking west.
W302
Fig. 3.7. Crushed ceramics on Pavement 128/154, looking east.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
47
to the pavement, which was identified in several places in the courtyard (L139, L3014, L3015/3026, L3029, L3043, L3057, L3081). Another entrance, at the western end of W6, led into a corridor flanked by W7 to the west and by Granary 141 and an inner mudbrick partition wall (W8) to the east. Within this corridor was a beaten-earth surface (L116/132, L108/117). Outside the walls of the courtyard were several associated beaten-earth surfaces (L130/157, L3018, L3062, L3063/3070, L3068, L3085). On the surface to the south of the compound (L130/157) lay a complete, overturned basalt bowl (Fig. 3.8). The surface north of the courtyard and adjacent to W317 (L3085) is the continuation of the surface adjacent to Building A2 (L3035). East of the compound were two badly damaged mudbrick walls (W305, W307) of unclear plan. East of W305, a small segment of a beaten-earth surface (L3041) was discerned.
Fig. 3.8. Overturned basalt bowl on Surface 130/157, looking northwest.
Granary 141. In the southwestern corner of the courtyard was a large circular structure. It was built over Stratum IV Silo 156, from which it was slightly offset and somewhat larger (outer diam. 4.4 m, inner diam. 2.8 m, depth 0.72 m), and appears to have replaced it (see Fig. 3.1). Its wall (W2) was preserved up to seven courses, partially set into the ground below the floor level. The mudbricks were of various shapes and sizes, usually arranged in two rows. The structure’s floor (L141/148) was constructed of mudbrick fragments and flat kurkar stones, the latter also partially lining the sides of the structure (Fig. 3.9). Two construction phases were discerned in the granary. In the earlier phase, the structure was erected and its mudbrick floor installed, sealing the Stratum IV remains below (Plan 3.1: Sections 1-1, 2-2). A 0.75 m gap in the mudbrick wall on the southern side appears to indicate an entrance into the granary (Plan 3.1: Section 2-2). In the later phase, this entranceway was blocked with small to medium-sized kurkar stones, and W6 appears to have been added, abutting the blocked entrance; thus, in the earlier phase, access to the courtyard was through a wider entrance.
48
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.9. Stratum III Granary 141, looking west. Note the floor of mudbrick fragments that covered the entire area of the granary.
Building A2. This building adjoined the courtyard on the north, its southern wall (W301) comprising part of the courtyardʼs northern perimeter. The general form of the building was rectangular with rounded outer corners. The mudbrick walls were founded directly on the basal dune and preserved to only one course (Fig. 3.10). The western wall (W304) formed
W301
W304
L3083
W318
Fig. 3.10. Building A2, looking south. Burial 3083 (Stratum II) to the right of the building.
49
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
a rounded corner with W318 to its north. The eastern extension of W318 was completely missing, yet probably met W316, the eastern wall, in a rounded corner. The southern wall of this structure (W301) differed from the other walls in that it was narrower, built of two rows of small to medium-sized stones. The extant remains of Building A2 indicate that it had an inner floor space of 28 sq m. No clear evidence of an entrance was identified, although it may be assumed that it was located in the buildingʼs southern wall, providing direct access to the courtyard. Inside the building was a segment of a beaten-earth floor (L3010). Stratum II (Plan 3.1) Remains of this stratum in southern Area A were few and disjointed, yet all appear to indicate a total discontinuity from Stratum III. A fragment of a stone-built structure was exposed, consisting of two walls (W303, W309) preserved up to two courses and constructed of two rows of small to medium-sized kurkar stones chinked with smaller stones, which join in a rounded corner. Wall 303 was parallel and adjacent to Stratum III W301; however, although these walls appear to relate to one another, there is little architectural logic in the placement of a large structure within the Stratum III courtyard. To the southeast of W303 and W309, and associated with them, was a rough pavement (L3022) of medium-sized stones that sloped down toward the south (Fig. 3.11). Additional Stratum II elements were uncovered in the southeastern corner of Area A (Sq E27). After Stratum III W310 and W302 had gone out of use, a new beaten-earth surface (L3040), a circular stone installation and several other stone concentrations were laid on top of these walls. In the adjoining square to the north, several stones, one of them perforated and possibly to be interpreted as an anchor (Fig. 3.12), were found adjacent to the top of W310 and may indicate the continuation of Surface 3040 to the north. West of Stratum III W304, an infant burial (L3083) was found above the Stratum III surface (L3035; Fig. 3.13) and was apparently interred from the Stratum II level, cutting down into the earlier surface.
W303
W301
L3022
Fig. 3.11. Remains of Stratum II stone structure next to Stratum III W301, looking west.
50
AMIR GOLANI
10 W3
Fig. 3.12. Stratum II stone remains in Sq E28, looking north. At upper left, an anchor(?).
Fig. 3.13. Burial 3083.
Area H (Plans 3.3–3.6) Area H comprised one of the largest excavated areas and included 38 excavation squares (Fig. 3.14).3 The area was divided into northern (Sqs 21–26) and southern (Sqs 15–20) parts. The northern portion of Area H is adjacent to southern Area A, the two being separated by a balk. In Stratum III, the stratigraphic linkage between these two areas is firmly established
Fig. 3.14. General view of Area H, looking north. At upper left, Area I.
See n. 2 above.
3
51
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
by the presence of several beaten-earth surfaces that continued from one area to the next, for example, Surfaces 130/157, 3018 and 3063/3070 in Area A (Sqs B–E27), observed in the northern extremity of Area H (Sqs B–C26, E26; see below). Although no beaten-earth surfaces connected Areas A and H in Stratum II, the remains in southern Area A were found within a dark brown matrix that overlay the Stratum III remains, and the same sequence was observed in northern Area H. Within Area H, three main strata (IV–II; Plan 3.3) and a few pits of Stratum I were identified. Stratum IV (Plan 3.4) The earliest occupation included a few surfaces and limited architectural remains founded on the basal dune. These were exposed only when the more prominent features of Stratum III were removed or in probes below the Stratum III layer; thus, only a very limited understanding of Stratum IV was achieved. In northern Area H, Stratum IV included part of a building (H1) and several surfaces. Stratum IV remains were generally lacking in central and southern Area H, probably due to the limited exposure. Even so, the Stratum IV occupation in Area H appears to have been sparse, characterized by a few architectural elements separated by broad open spaces. Northern Area H Building H1 The exposed remains appear to indicate part of an elliptical or horseshoe-shaped structure (W323, W401) oriented on an east–west axis, to which a wall was attached (W421; Fig. 3.15). Both walls were made of light brown mudbricks preserved up to one course high,
L3123
W4
01
W421
3
32
W
Fig. 3.15. Building H1, looking west. Note Stratum II Pit 3123 cutting W323.
52
AMIR GOLANI
C
3
D
E
F
3
1
B
2
A
26
26
4
1
4
2
25
25
Northern Area H
24 1
24
5
Building H1
23
22
22
W
1
23
21
21
Plan 3.3. Area H (north), composite plan, Strata IV–I and Sections 1-1–6-6.
53
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
20
20
42
19
1
19
6
W
18
18
6
Southern Area H 2
W4 1
17
1
W
W
17
16
16 Stratum I Stratum II Stratum III Stratum III, Phase A Stratum III, Phase B
15
Stratum IV 5 m
B
C
5
A
1
0 D
E
Plan 3.3 (cont.). Area H (south), composite plan, Strata IV–I and Sections 1-1–6-6.
F
15
27 00
28 00
29 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
b
b
a
a
L3091
L3048
L4044
L4135
D21
2-2
Sand
B26
L4081
L4153
L3091
Basal dune
W422
L3112
L4153
D15
D17
L4184
L4162
W402
W412
L4134
27 00
28 00
29 00
L125
Basal dune
L4140 L4171 L4179
1-1'
L153
L143
3-3
Basal dune
L3059
C26
W10
W408
1'-1''
L4060
L4055 L4 3
D23
Basal dune
27 00
28 00
29 00
L3093
L3073
L4046A L4046B
L4087
L4089A
L4066
D19
L4089B
L4028
a
a
1''-1'''
W409
L4192
L4188
L140
L4147
L4144
W414
D16
W311
4 62
D22
L4088
D18
L4168
L4137
4-4
C26
D24 L4033
Basal dune
L3079
Basal dune
L4045
Basal dune
L4072
D20
sand
L4053
L3098
Basal dune
b
b
L3056 L3110
D25
54
26 00
27 00
27 50
26 00
27 00
28 00
29 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
29 00
a
a
W408
L4098
15 L401 Basal dune 6
L4016 23
L4071B
C19
L4002
C24
6-6
L4138
D18
L4021
L4071A
L4030
L4084
L4025
L4017
Basal dune 45
W403 5
4038 Ba al dune
L4022
05'-5''
L4141
5-5' 40
L4008
C22 asa
C17 L4094
L4104 L4036 4L4107 4
L4023 4
L4182
4142 L145
L4105
L4048
L149
L4189
Smelting C installation
L4038
Plan 3.3 (cont.). Area H, composite plan, Strata IV–I (north) and Sections 1-1–6-6.
L4144
L4134
W403
C18
L4008 Basal dune
L4015
3
C23
W410
C16 L4166
L4062 L4067
5-5(4)
L4182
L4164
Basal dune
L4041
L4189
L4052
L4051
C21
L4186
C20
L4142 L4177
C15
a
a
55
B
C
2
A
D
3
3 L3114
26
27.63
27.73 27.66
27.27
27.55
4 1
4
26
L3096 L3100
L3076 L3087
27.57 27.63
27.55
Northern Area H
L3099
L3093 27.74
L3098
F
27.51 27.35
27.62 27.54
27.75
E
2
25
Building H1
W
3
L3121 L4014 L4049
27.98
L4018 27.84
27.80
W401
W421
24
28.04 27.78
27.73
L4019
L3103
27.28
27.22
5
27.80
L3110
27.56
32
Smelting installation
25
L3108 L3115
L3122
Smelting installation 27.86 27.81
27.13
24
L4046B 26.99
27.82
27.89 27.84
L4089B
19
19
6
18
L4147
18
26.26
L4179
Southern Area H
6
25.96
L4141
17
17 L4156 L4160 26.60
L4192 26.39
L4182 L4189
16
16
26.35
15
15
Stratum IV 5 m
B
C
5
A
1
0 D
Plan 3.4. Area H, Stratum IV.
E
F
57
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
and founded directly on the basal dune with no stone foundations. Wall 401 appears to mirror W323, yet no actual connection between the two was found. The western end of W323 was cut by a Stratum II pit (L3123), and no continuation of W401 was revealed in the square to the west (Sq J4, Area I). Within the apse was a beaten-earth floor (L3121, L4014/4049) with remains of a smelting installation embedded in it. North of W323 was a thin layer of debris (L3122) that may be associated with this building, yet no actual surface was encountered. South of W401 was a beaten-earth surface (L4019) that incorporated another smelting installation. In this area, W421, also built of light brown mudbricks and preserved up to one course, abutted W401. West of W421 was a beaten-earth surface (L4018) associated with its base. Other Stratum IV Remains To the northeast of Building H1, various beaten-earth surfaces were revealed in limited probes (Sqs B–D26, C25, D24), all founded on the basal dune below elements of Stratum III, and may be associated with Stratum IV (L3076/3087, L3093, L3096/3100, L3098, L3103, L3108/3115, L3110, L3114, L4046B; Plans 3.3: Sections 1-1, 2-2, 4-4; 3.4). These surfaces slope down slightly from northwest to southeast and apparently reflect the local topography of the basal dune. In Sq C26, several paving stones and remnants of ash, charcoal and burnt clay were found on one of these surfaces (L3093, L3098). Southern Area H
W4 08
In southern Area H, limited exposures (Sqs C16–17, D16–18) below Stratum III levels also revealed beaten-earth surfaces that were founded on the basal dune and may be associated with Stratum IV (L4141, L4147, L4156/4160, L4179, L4182/4189, L4192; Plans 3.3: Sections 1-1, 5-5; 3.4; Figs. 3.16, 3.17). No clear architectural remains related to any of these surfaces.
L4144
L4134
L4147 W412
Fig. 3.16. Stratum IV Surface 4147, and above it Phase IIIB Surface 4144, looking east.
58
AMIR GOLANI
W4 09
W414
L4192
Fig. 3.17. Square D16 at the end of excavation, looking west. Stratum III W414 atop Stratum IV Surface 4192.
Stratum III (Plan 3.5) Most of the remains in Area H are associated with Stratum III, which were identified on or just below the top of the basal dune, suggesting that the intensity of Stratum III building activities may have led to the removal of Stratum IV features. In Stratum III, northern Area H (Sqs A–E/19–26) comprised a large open space characterized by a few habitation surfaces, yet little or no architecture. In contrast, the southern part of Area H (Sqs B–E/15– 18) featured numerous building remains, comprising two compounds that were partially exposed, in which two phases were identified. Northern Area H In the northernmost squares of Area H (Sqs B–E/25–26), only one phase of Stratum III was revealed, lying directly atop Stratum IV, and it comprises a continuation of Stratum III in southern Area A (see above). A portion of a mudbrick wall (W311), preserved up to two courses, was associated with a beaten-earth surface that included several medium-sized paving stones (L3059, L3073/3079; Plans 3.3: Section 3-3; 3.5). The surface sloped down to the southeast and was also found to the west as L3091/3112 (Plan 3.3: Section 2-2). It is 0.19–0.29 m lower than a similar surface in Area I (L2079, L2063/2106; see Plan 3.7), 1 m to the west, and may provide a stratigraphic link between the Stratum III remains in northern Area H and Area I (see below). Farther east in northern Area H, the Stratum III remains consisted of a mudbrick wall preserved to one course (W313) with associated beaten-earth surfaces (L3065, L3071). To the southwest, a mudbrick wall oriented on a north–south axis (W320) was traced for nearly 3 m. In the south, the wall was cut by a Stratum II pit, revealing that it was preserved up to three courses and apparently turned westward to form a corner (Fig. 3.18). The continuation of this wall to the west and north was not revealed. To the east was a beaten-earth surface (L3092).
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
59
W320
Fig. 3.18. Stratum II pit cutting Stratum III W320, looking north.
Phase IIIB Granary 143 Part of a round granary was attributed to Phase IIIB. Only its eastern wall (W10), built of two rows of mudbricks and preserved to five courses, was exposed (Fig. 3.19). It appears to have been a freestanding structure (reconstructed outer diam. 5 m, inner diam. 4 m), founded on the basal dune. Within the granary, at the base of W10, was a beaten-earth floor (L143/153). The southern end of W10 was squared off 0.9 m from the balk, possibly indicating an entrance into this granary. The western part of the structure was not uncovered and may have been located underneath the Phase IIIA surface (L4036; see below). A small probe (L4104) in the northeastern corner of Sq C22 revealed no continuation of this wall (Plan 3.3: Section 5-5). Rather, a sandy matrix rich with ceramics and charred debris was encountered down to the top of the basal dune, indicating that the wall here was largely removed by the Phase IIIA surface.
W10
10
W
Fig. 3.19. Remnants of Granary 143, looking east.
60
AMIR GOLANI
B
C
2 3 28.09
28.00 27.96 27.91
L3091 L3112 28.00
L3059
D
E
28.00 27.89
27.48 27.36
28.03
L3073 27.93
W313
26
L3071 27.49
L3073 L3079
L3065
27.92
4
F
3
27.50
4
27.58 27.48
1
26
28.23 28.00
W311
A
W320
2
28.26 28.08
L3092
25
25
28.08
5 L4046A 27.20
24
L4021
L4045 27.30
27.28 27.04
27.30
27.65
23
24
L4030
Northern Area H
L4027 L4031
27.30
23
L4039
L4022 L4025
27.67
27.61
L4055 27.24
27.20
26.72 27.53
22
L4040
L4104
L4036 27.22
27.23
L4035
26.85 26.54
27.19
2 48
L4104
27.42
27.08
L140
L143 L153
27 00
W402 L4069
Smelting L4050 26.84 27.33 installation 27.44
21
27.14
L4047 L4075 27.45
L4054 26.99
27.27 26.36
27.46 27.29 27.20
L4048 L4051 27.22
26.91
22
10
W
27.06 26.52
27.36 27.00
L4070
26.99 26.51
26.50
27.00 26.50
L4081
27.04
27.14
L4052 26.70
Plan 3.5. Area H, Stratum III (north).
21
61
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
L4061 L4073
26.62
27.05 27.00
L4092
L4097
27.24
W406
L4129
27.23 27.06
W40
W411
9
26.89 26.62
L4193 26.42 L4167 L4173
26.90
27.19 26.90
27.15 26.95 26.95 26.77
26.78 26.73
26.80
L4140
26.45 27.27 26.87 26.85 26.63
W422 27.08 27.19 26.68
27.17 26.82 26.81 26.43
3
L4170 26.76 26.61
26.68
26.54
27.01 26.68
26.87 26.66
L4171 L4179
L4153 26.70
Eastern Compound
26.50
17
26.87
L4188 27.01 26.70
26.76
26.60
W41
0 26.93 26.76
16
26.80 26.60
26.68 26.49
Stratum III
26.96 26.80
Stratum III, Phase A
L4186
Stratum III, Phase B
26.79
13
L4194
W4
26.38
C
1
B
5 m
0
5
A
18
26.96 26.69
W409 27.40
L145 L149
L4172 L4175 26.79 L4197 L4196 26.70
26.96 26.72
L6223
26.50
W412
26.62
W41
27.08 27.21 27.09
L4133
L4164 L4166
26.82
Smelting installation
27.16
15
26.80
27.14 27.06
27.18 27.31
27.05
27.19 26.90
27.16
W415
L4146A
L4113
26.80
6
27.03 26.99
26.93
27.10
27.34
27.57 26.72
26.83 26.75
L4146B L4169 L4157 L4176
16
L4148
26.85 26.77
26.91
Smelting installation
27.29 27.16
L4134 L4138 26.75 L4144
27.13
L4143 27.02 26.77
25.66
26.93
27.01
26.10 27.10
L4124 L4128 L4151
26 59
L6217
27.06 27.03
W408
26.99 26.82
L4106
L4132
27.12
26.74
4
Western Compound
27.0
27.11 26.82
L4115
40
27.17
Southern Area H
17
26.96 25.65
27.12
L4108 L4125
W
26.91
27.15 27.03
27.11 27.08
27.14
L4120
18
19
6
27.24 27.18
L4109 L4114
26.45
L4119
W416 L4102 27.03
L4089A
26.92 26.04
26.90
L4091
27.30 27.25
27.02
27.00
27.37
W41
27.28 27.10 7 1 27.25 W4
L4087
L4098
27.08
27.40 27.35
W403
18 L4096
27.50
27.30
W420
W4
27.55 27.48
L4095
27.42 27.31
7
W403
40
5
W
19
20
L4072
27.46 27.57 27.47
W414
20
D
Plan 3.5 (cont.). Area H, Stratum III (south).
E
F
15
62
AMIR GOLANI
Open Area Surfaces and other features to the north and south of Granary 143 were founded on or within the upper portion of the basal dune. A shallow rounded pit (L4030) dug into the basal dune (Sq C24; Plan 3.3: Section 5-5) and overlaid by a Phase IIIA beaten-earth surface (L4021), contained numerous articulated donkey bones (Fig. 3.20; see Zidane and Bar-Oz, Fig. 3.20. Phase IIIB Pit 4030 with forthcoming). To the east, a beaten-earth concentration of donkey bones. surface (L4046A) was exposed above a Stratum IV surface (L4046B) and below a Phase IIIA surface (L4045; Plan 3.3: Section 1-1). To the south (Sq B19), Phase IIIB beaten-earth surfaces (L4096, L4097, L4102) were found under architectural remains of Phase IIIA (see below; Plan 3.5). Surface 4097 encompassed a circular pavement of sherds and flat stones and Surface 4102 incorporated a concentration of small stones. In the southeastern corner of the square, the Phase IIIB surface ran up to the edges of a pit (L4119) that descended into the sand layer. A deep probe (Sq D19) revealed a beaten-earth surface (4089A) founded on debris associated with Stratum IV (L4089B) and below a Phase IIIA surface (L4087; Plan 3.3: Section 1-1). Phase IIIA Open Area At a later stage, Granary 143 appears to have gone out of use. Wall 10 was covered by a beaten-earth surface (L140) and a new wall (W402) was built directly over the southern entranceway into the Phase IIIB granary. No continuation of this wall was found. However, to the west, one large Phase IIIA surface characterized by a packed light gray-brown mudbrick material with many white chips was exposed (L4035; Fig. 3.21). This surface was recognized in patches in many of the surrounding squares (B–C/24–21; L4021, L4022/4025, L4027, L4035, L4036/4104, L4045, L4047/4058, L4048/4051, L4055, L4081; Plans 3.3: Sections 1-1, 5-5; 3.5) and appears to define the Phase IIIA level in this area. Identification of this surface and its association with Phase IIIA was also instrumental in determining the stratigraphic sequence in southern Area H (see below). Several probes into and below this surface (Sqs B–C22, B23; L4031, L4040, L4104) revealed that it was founded on a light gray sandy matrix containing ceramics and charred debris laid over the basal dune. More probes to the south (Sqs B–C21; L4050, L4052, L4054; Plan 3.3: Section 5-5) exposed a thicker accumulation of debris (c. 0.5 m) down to the sand; time constraints precluded further excavation in these squares. Two installations were embedded in the Phase IIIA surface. In the northwestern part of Sq B21, a rounded installation (L4069) was sunken into Surface 4047/4075. From the surface, this installation appeared as a ring of mudbrick material (inner diam. 0.8 m), while
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
63
excavation revealed a rounded construction of large potsherds and mudbrick material, 0.2 m deep (Fig. 3.22). The other installation (L4070) was found in Sq C21, sunken into Surface 4048/4051. It consisted of a complete ceramic pithos, nearly 1 m in height, its rim flush with the surface (Figs. 3.23, 3.24; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming). The pithos was full of soil and stones and may have originally been used as a small storage installation. The base of this jar was embedded in the basal dune, suggesting that a large pit had been dug in this area in order to accommodate the vessel.
L4040
L4035
L4010
L4011
Fig. 3.21. Square B22, looking east. Strata III and II surfaces (L4035 and L4010, L4011, respectively). Note Probe 4040 showing the makeup of the Stratum III surface as a distinct layer of mudbrick material.
Fig. 3.22. Installation 4069 after excavation. Note the construction of mudbricks and potsherds lined at the top with small stones.
64
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.23. The top of Pithos 4070 after removal of the surface around it.
Fig. 3.24. The pithos fully exposed.
L4119
Farther south, additional Phase IIIA beaten-earth surfaces were encountered. In Sq D20, the surface (L4072) appears to have incorporated a wide, sloping pit of unclear size and form. As the pit was full of dark ash and burnt mudbricks, it was apparently a smelting installation associated with the eastern compound located nearby to the south (Plan 3.3: Section 1-1). In Sq D19, Surface 4087 overlay the Phase IIIB surface (L4089A) and continued to the west, where it was identified as L4092 and L4098 )Plan 3.5). In Sq B19, a concentration of architectural remains of unclear plan was found above Phase IIIB surfaces (L4096, L4097, L4102), comprising several mudbrick walls (W416, W417, W418, W420) preserved up to two courses. Limited remains of a beaten-earth surface (L4091) were detected between W416 and W417, and another beaten-earth surface with a concentration of stones (L4095) was uncovered to the north of W420 (Fig. 3.25).
41 W
L4097
7
W416
W4
18
W420
L4095
Fig. 3.25. The Phase IIIA walls in Sq B19, looking south. Note Phase IIIB circular sherd-and-stone pavement (L4097), overlaid by W416.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
65
A portion of another mudbrick wall (W407) was found in the corner of Sq B20, and its relationship to the architectural remains described above was unclear; it may represent the continuation of W404 of the western compound (see below). It was preserved up to two courses and associated with a beaten-earth surface (L4061/4073). These latter features are all attributed to Phase IIIA on the basis of their heights in relation to the known Phase IIIA elements in the adjoining Sq B19. Southern Area H Southern Area H differed from the northern part and was characterized by extensive building remains consisting of two large compounds separated by a narrow, north–south alley (Fig. 3.26). To the north, this alley opened onto the broad open area in northern Area H, and to the south, onto another large open area that continued into Area M (see below). Both compounds were founded in Phase IIIB and continued to function in Phase IIIA. Phase IIIB The Eastern Compound Three walls of the eastern compound’s perimeter were exposed (W403, W408, W409), all built of mudbricks without stone foundations and preserved up to five courses. These walls were often partially faced with small to medium-sized kurkar stones; occasionally, such stones were incorporated in the wall itself (Plan 3.3: Section 5-5). The outer corners of the
Fig. 3.26. General view of southern Area H, looking west.
66
AMIR GOLANI
W4 03
compound appear to have been rounded, although only one corner was fully exposed (Fig. 3.27). One of the compound’s walls (W403) was fully excavated and two others (W408, W409) partially, so the shape of the compound may plausibly be reconstructed as rectangular (10 × 11–14 m; inner area 85–100 sq m). The large area of this structure suggests that it was not W40 roofed, and no pillar bases were found 9 during excavation. A sizeable part of the northwestern portion of this structure was fully excavated down to and beneath its earliest floors. Two inner partition walls (W412, W422) preserved up to three courses were apparently attached to W403. They divided W41 0 the western part of the compound into three roughly equal cell-like spaces. In the northernmost cell, the earliest beaten-earth surface (L4144) was largely removed by Fig. 3.27. The southwestern corner of the Phase IIIA activities. It was associated with eastern compound, looking north. the base of W412, and to the north it sloped up to the base of W408, where it appears to have included a partial stone pavement (Fig. 3.28). South of W412 was an additional beaten-earth surface (L4140; Plan 3.3: Section 1-1).
8
40
W
W412
L4147
L4134
L4144
Fig. 3.28. Square D18, looking northwest. Phase IIIB W412 and W408 with associated Surface 4144. At upper right, a Phase IIIA installation adjacent to W408.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
67
East of W422, large accumulations of burnt debris were observed on a beaten-earth surface (L4171/4179; Plan 3.3: Section 1-1; Fig. 3.29). The debris included large ceramic fragments. Northeast and outside the compound, adjacent to W408 in Sq E18,4 a beatenearth surface (L6223) was detected at the base of the wall, and south of the compound, a small annex may be reconstructed, appended to the western end of W409. A segment of a heavily eroded mudbrick wall (W414) ran north–south, apparently connecting with W409 (Sq D16). Examination of the balk in this area showed that W414 extended toward but did not connect with W409, with a beaten-earth surface (L4188) at its base (Plan 3.3: Section 1-1). This surface was also found in the adjoining square to the west (L145/149), associated with east–west W410, which may have joined with W414, although the corner of these two walls was not reached. Wall 410 was preserved up to two courses. On the floor at the western end of this wall were the remains of a ceramic vessel, and adjoining W410 to the south was what appears to have been a mudbrick bin. The Western Compound To the west, another compound was partially exposed, consisting of an enclosure wall encompassing a silo and several architectural fragments of unclear plan. The bulk of the compound appeared to lie outside the excavated area. The western compound, like the eastern one, was founded in Phase IIIB. The mudbrick enclosure wall (W405, W413) was traced in a wide arc for at least 20 m, preserved up to five courses with no apparent stone foundation. The southern extremity of this wall was found in Sq B15 (W413; Fig. 3.30). The northern end of the wall (W405) ended abruptly
Fig. 3.29. Phase IIIB burnt debris deposits in the eastern compound.
At the western end of Area L, Sq E18 was later understood to contain portions of the eastern compound exposed in Area H (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3). For this reason, the finds in this square are described here within Area H, although they were originally excavated as part of Area L. Thus, the loci and baskets were registered in the context of Area L, while the architectural remains (W408) were registered in Area H. 4
68
AMIR GOLANI
L4193
13
W4
L4194
Fig. 3.30. Phase IIIB W413 and the adjoining surfaces in Sq B15, looking north. Note the thin white strip in the upper left corner (arrow) representing Phase IIIA Surface 4173 that overlay this wall.
(Fig. 3.31), with no clear continuation northward associated with Phase IIIB, suggesting the existence of a wide opening into the compound. Wall 405 ran parallel to W403 of the eastern compound, creating a narrow alley, 0.9–1.5 m wide, that ran for 10 m on a north– south axis. A beaten-earth surface (L4115, L4133) extended between these walls. Outside the compound to the southeast, another beaten-earth surface (L4164/4166, L4194) was associated with the base of the wall.
W403
4
W405
40
W
Fig. 3.31. Wall 405 of the western compound and its continuation in Phase IIIA as W404; W403 of the eastern compound above, looking east.
69
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Within the compound, a beaten-earth surface (L4129, L4169/4176, L4193) was associated with the base of the enclosure wall. Very few Phase IIIB architectural remains were found, consisting of a mudbrick silo and a north–south mudbrick wall (W411; Sq B17) of which one course was preserved, and to the west, a beaten-earth surface with many white inclusions and a smelting installation (L4128/4151). Silo 4124. This silo (outer diam. 2.8 m, inner diam. 2.0 m), just inside the enclosure wall, was constructed of a large, deep pit dug 1.3 m into the basal dune, in which a circular mudbrick wall (W406) was built, preserved up to twelve courses (Fig. 3.32). A later pit had removed most of the eastern half of the silo; a deep probe in Sq C18 exposed the base of the silo wall (Fig. 3.33). Within the silo was an accumulation of loose, dark gray debris
L4109
W404
6
40
W
Fig. 3.32. Phase IIIB Silo 4124, Phase IIIA Surface 4109/4114 above it, and W404.
L4108
W
40 6
W404
W403
W405
Fig. 3.33. Square C18, looking north. Phase IIIB Silo 4124, and Phase IIIA W404 and Surface 4108/4125.
70
AMIR GOLANI
(L4124, 4132), excavated in the western half down to its base. Outside the silo, a beatenearth surface (L4120) was associated with its upper course. Open Area to the South This area was investigated toward the end of the final season; therefore, a complete stratigraphic profile of the area was obtained in only a few squares. During excavation of a Phase IIIB surface (L4164/4166) east of W413, several infant and child burials were exposed just below the surface. Two burials, an infant (L4175) and a child (L4196), were uncovered partly below the base of W413 (Sq. C16, Fig. 3.34). They each contained an articulated burial (Fig. 3.35) covered with large ceramic fragments. Two burials farther east (Sq. C16) consisted of an infant in a holemouth jar (L4172; Fig. 3.36), and a small child covered with a few ceramic sherds (4170; Fig. 3.37). The Phase IIIB surface in the open area apparently continued to the south. In Sq C15, a surface (L4186) with large amounts of ash and burnt mudbrick fragments was exposed (Plan 3.3: Section 5-5).
W413
L4196
L4175
Fig. 3.34. Burials 4175 and 4196 adjacent to and beneath W413.
Fig. 3.35. Burial 4196 after removal of the ceramic cover.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Fig. 3.36. Burial 4172 after removal of the upper half of the ceramic vessel.
71
Fig. 3.37. Burial 4170 after removal of the ceramic cover.
Phase IIIA The Eastern Compound This compound continued in use with some modifications. Small to medium-sized kurkar stones were inserted to lend support and stability to its mudbrick walls. Outside the compound, to the northeast and adjacent to W408, a Phase IIIA surface (L6217) that included a large patch of whitish-colored material was laid above Phase IIIB Surface 6223. Within the compound, a new beaten-earth surface was laid. In the northernmost cell, a rounded, roughly built stone installation was constructed adjacent to W408 at a slightly higher level than the Phase IIIB surface (see Fig. 3.28). The stones of this feature bore clear signs of intense heat and burning, and adjacent to this installation were large amounts of ash and burnt mudbrick fragments. In addition, large amounts of ash and burnt debris were found in a large pit (L4138) that was cut from the Phase IIIA surface (L4134) down to the Phase IIIB surface (L4144; Fig. 3.38; Plan 3.3: Section 6-6). This pit appears to have served as a convenient dumping area within the compound for the large amounts of debris produced by the smelting installation. Similar debris accumulations were also observed in the other cells on the western side of the compound, as well as outside of it. East of W422, a beaten-earth surface (L4153) covered the Phase IIIB burnt debris buildup (Sq D17; Plan 3.3: Section 1-1). The top of this burnt layer was also exposed to the south, next to W409, where a small part of a large smelting installation was uncovered. The smelting installations and the large amounts of burnt debris found within this compound attest to intensive metallurgical industry, most probably the processing of copper (see Chapter 4: Industrial Compounds for Metallurgical Activities). The Western Compound This compound also continued to function with several alterations. The southern part of enclosure W413 (Sq B15) appears to have gone out of use, as a beaten-earth surface with several small to medium-sized stones (L4167/4173) apparently overlay it; however, in the continuation of W413 to the north (W405), a number of stones on this wall (W419) may represent poorly preserved Phase IIIA rebuilding. Wall 405 abruptly ended in Sq C18, and a
72
AMIR GOLANI
L4138
L4144
Fig. 3.38. The burnt fill in Phase IIIA Pit 4138, cutting down to Phase IIIB Surface 4144. Note the boundary of the pit at upper left, where the burnt fill ends.
later wall of mudbricks, preserved up to one course only and incorporating a line of stones (W404), appears to continue the line of W405 (see Fig. 3.33). This suggests that the wide entrance postulated in Phase IIIB was restricted; W404 may have continued northward to connect with the fragmentary walls in northern Area H. Additional elements identified with Phase IIIA include a segment of a wide, east– west wall (W415) built of two rows of medium-sized kurkar stones with smaller chinking stones, preserved up to one course. The wall may have been squared off at its eastern end, next to which was a smelting installation ringed with small stones. South of this wall was a beaten-earth surface (L4146A), which is the continuation of Surface 4167/4173; north of the wall was a similar surface (L4146B/4157). Farther north, a thick surface of packed, light gray-brown mudbrick material with many white chips (L4108/4125, L4109/4114), adjoined W404 and covered and sealed Phase IIIB Silo 4124 (see Figs. 3.32, 3.33). An identical Phase IIIA surface was revealed in northern Area H (see above, L4035) and therefore provides a stratigraphic marker characterizing Phase IIIA and differentiating it from Phase IIIB in both northern and southern Area H. The alley between the eastern and the western compounds was resurfaced (L4106, L4113), although in Sq C17 it could not be established with certainty if the surface also covered W405. Stratum II (Plan 3.6) In this stratum, Area H was characterized by a small number of surfaces and disjointed building remains. These were all found in proximity to, or at the level of the modern-day surface, within a dark brown, heavy and compacted matrix (Chapter 2: Section D16: Unit 2) that was quite different from the brown sandy matrix characteristic of Stratum III. It is unclear what, if any, of the Stratum II remains were removed by modern earth-moving equipment. In any case, their poor nature is more probably due to post-habitation erosion of the site.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
73
In northern Area H, the Stratum II remains in Sq B26 consisted of a beaten-earth surface with small stones incorporated in it (L3048). In the adjoining square to the south was a pit full of small stones (L3123) that cut into Stratum III W320 (see Fig. 3.18). Farther south (Sqs B–D23, C–D24), the remains of habitation horizons consisted of patchy, ash-bearing layers at the bottom of the dark brown and compacted matrix typical of this stratum (L4003, L4015/4017, L4016/4020, L4028, 4033; Plans 3.3: Sections 1-1, 5-5; 3.6). In Sq B22, a portion of a pavement (L4010, L4011), or possibly a wall of unclear plan, was comprised of closely fitted, medium-sized stones (see Fig. 3.21). In the adjoining square, a small portion of a mudbrick wall (W400), preserved up to two courses, may be associated with Stratum II, although mudbrick construction in this stratum throughout the site seems to have been extremely rare. North and south of this wall were beaten-earth surfaces (L4007, L4008, L4013), while to the east and northwest the remains of smelting installations were embedded in the surface. Farther east and south, additional Stratum II habitation horizons often featured concentrations of small to medium-sized stones upon them, in no discernable order (L125, L4024, L4038/4041, L4044, L4053, L4071A). In Sq C20, a large, wide pit full of the typical dark brown, compacted Stratum II matrix was found (L4067), covered by a layer of debris (L4062; Plan 3.3: Section 5-5). Farther south, the Stratum II deposits were of similar nature, although the dark brown compacted matrix was thicker, at times reaching a depth of over 1.2 m (Plan 3.3: Section 5-5). Despite this buildup, the nature of the finds was as meager as that in the rest of Area H. Habitation horizons were identified in a few squares (C17, E18), usually interspersed with concentrations of small to medium-sized stones in no apparent order (L4094, L6215). Stratum I (Plan 3.6) Stratum I of the Byzantine period includes a few shallow pits and ceramic material in the sandy topsoil. In two locales in the northern part of the area, pits full of loose, light sand with Byzantine ceramic remains were found (L3120, L4000); Pit 3120 contained numerous crushed Gaza storage jars (Fig. 3.39; see Appendix 2: Fig. App. 2.4:1).
Fig. 3.39. Byzantine Pit 3120 with crushed Gaza storage jars.
74
AMIR GOLANI
A
C
2
B
D
F
3
3
28.33 28.25
E
L3048
28.25
26
26 28.13
4
4
1
L3120
2
25
L3123 27.78
25 28.30
5 27.59
24
L4033 27.57
Northern Area H
27.88 27.86
L4016 L4020
27.57
L4000 27.83
23
27.47
27.39
27.48
L4003 27.80
27.45
27.55
27.54 27.44
27.84
22 27.90 27.83
L4028
L4015 L4017
27.80
L4010
27.85
27.64 27.50
L4011
27.47
L4007 27.51
W4 L4013 00
27.75
L4008 27.35
27.63 27.50
22
27.30
L125
Smelting installation
27.59 27.55
27.93 27.82 27.88
L4024 27.97
23
27.47
Smelting installation
27.48
21
24
27.60 27.56
27.97 27.83 27.84
27.47 27.40
L4038 L4041 27.45 27.40
27.48
27.43 27.40
27.50 27.25
L4044 27.30
27.46 27.43
27.29 27.24
27.40 27.31
Fig. 3.6. Area H (north), Strata II–I.
21
75
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
27.42
L4053 27.38
L4067
20
20
L4062 27.17
Smelting installation 27.40 27.38
19
19
L4071A
6
27.14
L6215
Smelting installation
27.02
27.18 27.03
18
18
Southern Area H
6
27.26 27.17
L4191 27.31 27.21
17
27.28
27.26 27.16
L4094
17
16
16
Stratum I
15
15
Stratum II
B
C
5
A
1
0 D
Fig. 3.6 (cont). Area H (south), Strata II–I.
E
5 m F
76
AMIR GOLANI
Area I (Plan 3.7) Area I is positioned slightly higher than Area H on the eastern slope of the kurkar ridge (Fig. 3.40; see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3).5 The easternmost squares of Area I (Sqs J3–4) share a balk with Sqs B25–26 of northern Area H, and Stratum III beaten-earth surfaces in Area H Sqs B25–26 (L3091/3112, L3092) are directly linked to identical surfaces in Sqs J3–4 (see below). The excavations in Area I revealed remains attributed to Strata IV–II. Stratum IV (Plan 3.7) The Stratum IV remains in this area were reached in only a few places below Stratum III. They consisted of a few walls and associated surfaces founded on the basal dune, comprising the first occupation in this area. A mudbrick wall (W215) preserved up to one course, ran south to north, then curved westward, where the Stratum IV remains were at a slightly higher level due to the natural slope (Plan 3.7: Section 3-3). East of W215 were associated beaten-earth surfaces (L2067/2088, L2074/2080). Surface 2067/2088 (Sq H5) incorporated some small stones found adjacent to W215. A north–south line of small to
Fig. 3.40. General view of Area I at the end of excavations, looking north. At right, the northern portion of Area H.
This area was initially opened as a southern extension of Area J, when a few crumbling stone and mudbrick walls were noted on the modern surface. However, once evaluation of the architectural remains indicated the presence of a large building complex, the squares in this area were designated as a separate excavation area, Area I; however, the consecutive basket, locus and wall numbers used in the field recording continued to be taken from the same number bank as Area J. 5
77
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
medium-sized stones (W221), observed on the modern-day surface in this square, may indicate the presence of a wall that was dismantled during Stratum III (Fig. 3.41). In the central part of the excavated area (Sq I4), a probe below Stratum III W208 (Plan 3.7: Section 2-2) exposed several paving stones on a beaten-earth surface (L2108/2115) that may be attributed to Stratum IV, as they appear to predate the Stratum III structure (see below). Another probe (Sq J4), below Stratum III W216, exposed debris that included numerous burnt clay and mudbrick fragments (L2094; Plan 3.7: Section 4-4). In the southern part of the excavated area (Sq J2), a similar probe below Stratum III exposed habitation buildup (L2110) on the basal dune (Plan 3.7: Section 1-1). The limited exposure of Stratum IV in Area I suggests the existence of a boundary or compound wall (W215) on the western edge of the area; other remains are too disjointed to enable any conclusions. Stratum III (Plan 3.7) The predominant feature in Area I is a compound consisting of a large courtyard bounded by a stone wall with at least two entrances, and the fragmentary remains of a smaller, adjoining building to its north (Structure I1). The entire compound was constructed on the moderate southeast-facing slope, thus surfaces in the northwest were significantly higher than those to the south and east. Several architectural modifications were observed within this complex, but only one clear habitation level was identified, therefore there was no definition of stratigraphic Phases IIIB and IIIA, as in other areas.
4
W
21 3
10
W20
W215
21
W
8
2
21 1
5 21 W
W
22 1
W
W
Fig. 3.41. Area I at the end of excavations, looking south. At right, the Stratum IV remains. Note one of the pillar bases of Stratum III Structure I1 (arrow), north of W208.
78
AMIR GOLANI
H
I L2087
6
6
28.60
W 221
28.67
L2051
W211
28.70
28.68 28.79 28.66 28.99 28.64 28.85 28.61
W215
29.00 28.95
28.64
L2048 28.59
L2027
28.61 4 28.50
L2074 L2080
28.30
28.53
28.43 28.31
W213
L2072 L2085 28.29 28.12
W21
28.23
Courtyard
7
L2063 L2106
3
28.19
28.34 28.17
28.20 28.13 28.37 27.93
27.97
L2100
L2109 L2118
28.35 27.16
2
4
28.44 28.25
28.20
28.20
28.19 28.09
3
28.29
28.25
Smelting installation
22
28.47 28.26
28.49 28.27
28.50 28.25
L2107 L2120
28.26
28.62 28.42
28.37 28.27
28.24
L2129
3
L2079
L2061 L2114
28.21
28.43 28.27
28.62 28.52
4 L2094
L2105 L2112 W218 28.29
28.35 28.21
28.80 28.60
28.51 28.40
W216
28.53 29.09 28.36 28.48
28.93 28.59
28.51
28.96 28.58
28.80 28.57
L2108 L2115
L2044 L2098
28.40
28.99 28.58
5
W2
4
28.72 28.57
W208
28.83 28.75
L2059 L2068
L2087
28.71 28.64
L2086
1
L2067 L2088
Structure I1
W214
29.07 29.02
W210
L2090
29.97 28.80
2
28.92 28.76
W2
19
3
29.03 28.98
L2095
5
J
28.05 28.28 27.89
28.04
28.14 28.01
2
1
L2110
2
Stratum II Stratum III
1
1
Stratum IV 5 m
0 H
I
J
Plan 3.7. Area I, composite plan, Strata IV–II and Sections 1-1–4-4.
The Courtyard The western, northern and eastern walls of the courtyard (8 × 14 m) were uncovered. To the west, the courtyard was bounded by W213, built of medium-sized to large kurkar stones arranged in two rows with smaller chinking stones, preserved up to three courses and traced for 10 m. Large amounts of stone rubble (Sq H3) were found adjacent to the eastern face of this wall, apparently from its collapse. At its northern end, W213 bonded with W208, of similar construction and preserved up to four courses. This wall was heavily damaged
79
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
29 00
J2
J4
L2061
W214
W217
72 L2114
L2085
L2110
L2105
J Pit
L2072 4
28 00
27 00 W214
J3
Pit 2
W218
L2112
1-1
29 00
28 00 W
L2039 3 L2044
I5
W210
I3
I4
W208 L2098
L2120
L2108 L2 L2115
I2
L2107
W217
L2109 L2118
27 00
2-2
H3
H4
9L2054
29 00
L2059
L2051
L205 L2068
Pit W213
W213 28 00
W215
W215 L2080
H5
Pit L2067 L2095
L2074
27 00
3-3
29 00
28 00
W208
J4
I4
L2018
L2108 L2115
Pit
W216
L2079 L2094
27 00
4-4
Plan 3.7 (cont.). Area I, composite plan, Strata IV–II and Sections 1-1–4-4.
by intrusions of Stratum I sand pockets. At its eastern end, W208 bonded with W210 of the adjacent building. The eastern continuation of the northern courtyard wall (W216) was separated from W208 by a gap nearly 2 m wide. This gap was filled by a Stratum I intrusion (Plan 3.7: Section 4-4). As the western end of W216 was squared off, a wide entrance into the courtyard from the north may have existed here. Wall 216 bonded with the eastern wall of the courtyard (W214) in what may have been a rounded corner. Wall 214, also of similar construction to W213, was preserved up to four courses and traced for nearly 14 m. In the
L2088
80
AMIR GOLANI
center of this wall was a blocked entrance (Fig. 3.42), indicating that during its original stage, the courtyard was also accessed from the east. Two partition walls (W218, W217) abutted W214. In the north, W218, built of one row of medium-sized to large stones preserved up to three courses, was constructed opposite the northern entrance to the courtyard, creating a small vestibule with a beaten-earth surface (L2105/2112; Plan 3.7: Section 1-1). South of the blocked entrance in W214 was W217, built of light cream-gray mudbricks on its southern side and brown mudbricks on its northern side (Fig. 3.43). A line of stones preserved up to two courses was revealed along the northern face of this wall and was probably incorporated into its construction. A northeast–southwest line of stones (W222) appears to join W217 at a right angle (Fig. 3.44).
W21
4
Fig. 3.42. The blocked-up eastern entrance into the courtyard in upper center, looking east.
W214
W217
Fig. 3.43. Wall 217, looking east. At far left, the brown mudbricks incorporating stones; at center, the light cream-gray mudbricks.
81
W2
17
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W222
L2120
Fig. 3.44. Wall 222 and W217, looking east. Note the three-legged basalt vessel adjacent to W222 (arrow).
Within the courtyard, a beaten-earth surface was associated with W213 and W214 (L2044/2098, L2129 and L2061/2114, L2072/2085, respectively; Plan 3.7: Sections 1-1, 2-2). A crushed storage jar lay on this surface (L2129) next to W213 (Fig. 3.45). The surface was also identified in the center of the courtyard, with a large fragment of a three-legged basalt bowl on it (L2107/2120; Figs. 3.44, 3.46; see Rosenberg, forthcoming). The outline of a smelting installation surrounded by numerous fragments of burnt clay and mudbrick was discerned in this part of the courtyard, although it was not fully excavated. In the southern portion of the courtyard, the same surface (L2109/2118) and part of a pavement constructed of compacted small stones were exposed. Several beaten-earth surfaces outside the courtyard were also associated with the walls. To the west, adjacent to W213, Surface 2059/2068 incorporated Stratum IV W215 W213
L2129
Fig. 3.45. Crushed storage jar next to W213.
82
AMIR GOLANI
2
22
W
W217
Fig. 3.46. Surface 2107 in the center of the courtyard, looking northeast.
within its make-up, and the top of the wall functioned as part of the surface itself (Sq H4; Plan 3.7: Section 3-3). As noted above, the surfaces east of the courtyard, adjacent to W214 (L2100, L2063/2106, L2079), may be linked to the surfaces in northern Area H (L3091/3112, L3092). Structure I1 The eastern wall (W210) of the adjoining structure was built of medium-sized kurkar stones arranged in two rows with smaller chinking stones and preserved up to four courses. Only a few stones remained of its northern continuation; most of this wall appears to have been robbed or eroded away. The western wall may have been W211, built of light cream-gray mudbricks preserved up to three courses atop a partial foundation of small kurkar stones (Fig. 3.47), although this wall was constructed in a different manner than the other walls associated with the Stratum III complex. The southern continuation of W211 does not seem
15
W2
W219 W221 W211
L2086
Fig. 3.47. Strata IV–III remains in Sq H5, looking west.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
83
to bond with or abut W208; rather, it appears to continue adjacent to W213. The northern continuation of W211 was not excavated. Excavations in Sq I6 revealed no remnants of this structure’s northern wall. Within the building, a beaten-earth floor (L2048, L2086, L2087) was associated with the base of the walls. Two stone-built circular installations found parallel to W210 are interpreted as pillar bases (see Fig. 3.41). Outside and to the west of this structure, traces of a beaten-earth surface (L2051) were exposed. A short protrusion in the western face of W211 and a short mudbrick wall (W219) observed in the northern balk of Sq H5 (Fig. 3.47), appear to have been later additions to this complex; no surfaces were associated with these two features. Stratum II (Plan 3.7) The meager remains of this stratum all appeared on the modern surface or just below it. They consisted of small patches of stone pavements in Sq I5 (L2027), and a burial of a child in a storage jar in Sq H5 (L2090). The vessel lay on its side, and the upper half had been shaved away (Figs. 3.48, 3.49). The burial cut into the upper part of Stratum III W211, indicating that the wall had gone out of use.
Fig. 3.48. Burial 2090 set into W211, as it appeared on the modern ground surface prior to excavation.
Fig. 3.49. Burial 2090, after excavation.
84
AMIR GOLANI
Although the Stratum II remains had been almost completely removed by bulldozer, there was no clear evidence of any significant building remains, and this area was apparently an open space at the fringes of the settlement.
Area M (Plans 3.8–3.10) Area M is located to the south of Area H, on a level area in the center of the site (Fig. 3.50).6 The excavations here exposed remains of Strata IV and III (Plan 3.8). Areas M and H are stratigraphically connected by habitation horizons of dark ash layers: at the southern extremity of Area H, L4186 continued into Area M as L7145 (see below), both surfaces associated with Phase IIIB. Stratum IV was not substantially exposed due to lack of time. Area M is also stratigraphically connected to Area B by habitation horizons in both Stratum IV and III (see below).
Fig. 3.50. The southern portion of Area M, looking east. At upper right, the edge of Area B.
In the first excavation season, three probes were carried out in Sqs B–C9 and D12 of Area M in the framework of excavations in Area B, and the relevant loci for these probes are found in the locus register of that area. Work in Area M resumed on a larger scale in the third excavation season. 6
A
B
C
D 1
85
14
14
2
72
W721
W
13
13
2
W720
16 W7
Northern Area M
W7
19
12
W71 8
12
4
W72 5
72
W
11
11
7
W71
W715
10
5
10
3
71
9
W726
W
W25
9
3
3
Southern Area M
8
W703
6
70
W712
W
W705
8
4 W707
W714
5
4
W708
Stratum IV, Phase A
6
W711
Stratum IV, Phase B
B
Area B
W
C
1
A
W24 20
5 m
0
7
W23
Stratum III, Phase B
W710
W7
04
2
Building M1
Stratum III, Phase A
09
W7
7
D
Plan 3.8. Area M, composite plan, Strata IV–III and Sections 1-1–5-5.
6
26 00
27 00
28 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
26 00
27 00
28 00 7 3
26 00
27 00 7
28 00
a
a
a
Sand
C9
D10
L7124
Sand
L7105
W708
L7083
L7081
L7045 704 L7049
L7029
L7144
W704
D7
L7026
L7013
L4162 10
L7056
L7012 016 L7016 7039 L7039
L7011 L7015 6L7024
a
L7145
C14
L7097 7 L7106
7W707
L7052 B
L7078
2'-2''
D11
2-2'
L7113
L7043
L7010 L703 L7018 L7036 L7031 L7036
D8
L7116 1' 1''
L7076
W714
C8
1'-1''
W706
Sand
L7106 7 W707
L7019 L702 L7028
14 L7059 8Burial
L7134 L7157
Basal dune
L238
L226
L216
Sand
D12
L7149
L7122 L7 L7129
D9
C7
L7139
L7098 L 3 L7114 LL L7118 L
1-1'
W719
43and L7152
C12 a L7130
L7133
a
a
L7035 L70
L7033
W7 L77 W718
1L7143 ar
Sand Sa
L7066
L7082
L7048
L7148
Dark sand
Plan 3.8 (cont). Area M, composite plan, Strata IV–III and Sections 1-1–5-5.
L7037 L70 L7046
L7032
L7150
L7110
C13 Sand
W711
L7034
C6
L7141
C11 S
L7094
W717
S aDark sand
C10 Sand
a
a
AMIR GOLANI
87
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
L7022 28 00
27 00
26 00
L7046
C8
L7137
L7018
L7019
D8
L7028
L7031
L7010
L7105
L7052
L7086
L7032
L7036 W707
L7043
W707
3-3
L7129
28 00
L7011
L7134
D9
L7015
27 00
L7122 L7157
L7149 7036
L7013
L7026
L7024 26 00
C9
L7029
L71 Basal dune
4-4
28 00
27 00
L228
B9 W25 L221 L243 L247
L235
Basal dune
26 00
5-5
Plan 3.8 (cont.). Area M, composite plan, Strata IV–III and Sections 1-1–5-5.
Stratum IV (Plan 3.9) Several architectural elements of this stratum were identified. In northern Area M, two deep probes exposed portions of walls and associated surfaces. In the more thoroughly excavated southern part of the area, the remains included a complete building (M1), in which two building phases were identified, and several adjacent walls. Northern Area M In a probe in Sq C12, the inner corner of a structure was exposed, composed of two mudbrick walls (W718, W719) preserved up to two courses. A beaten-earth surface (L7153) lay at the base of these walls to the south of W719, while a small area of a similar surface (L7152) was uncovered to the north of W719 (Plan 3.8: Section 1-1). In a probe to the south, another mudbrick wall was revealed (W717), preserved up to four courses, founded on a thin fill atop the basal dune (Fig. 3.51; Plan 3.8: Section 1-1). At the base of this wall was a beatenearth surface (L7148) at a lower level than the surface to its north (L7153). This may indicate two different phases of Stratum IV, the earlier of which was not reached in Sq C12 (see below), or that the Stratum IV habitation was founded on a southern-facing slope. West of these walls, a very small portion of a Stratum IV surface was exposed in Sq B11 (L7156), where part of the Stratum III surface was removed.
A
B
C
D 1
88
14
13
13
2
14
12
Northern Area M
26.74
W71
9 26.61 L7152 26.60
12
26.76 26.62
L7153
W718
26.60
26.71 26.63 26.44
L7156 26.33
11
L7148 26.32
26.77 26.43
11
26.76 26.35
7
W71
10
5
10
L7159 26.47
9
26.60
L7026 L7029
L7149 L7157
26.54
7
26.45 26.63
26.83 26.54
Stratum IV, Phase A Stratum IV, Phase B
L7104 26.55
B
26.74 26.53
7
L7075 26.50
26.69 26.53
L7082 26.50
W711 L7094 26.50
C
Plan 3.9. Area M, Stratum IV.
L218
6
W24 26.83 26.50
1
A
26.42
26.57
Building M1
5 m
8
26.62
26.63
26.75 26.50
26.62
L7113
L7118 L7133 26.89
3
W23
26.57
26.82 26.62 26.54 26.58
4
L7036 L7043
L7106
L7139
W705
L7099
26.85
26.82 26.40 26.64
26.71 26.56
W712
26.44
26.83
0
26.35
26.43
26.56 26.42
6
L7116
L7076 L7103 L7078
W714
26.50
26.90 26.51
26.85 26.47
26.54
W708
Southern Area M
W707
2
5
8
26.96 26.83 26.47 26.55
3
L7042
26.66 26.49
26.50
4
9
W726
L247
Area B
D
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
89
Fig. 3.51. Stratum IV W717, looking south. Note the Stratum IIIB dark ash layer overlaying this wall, apparent in all three balks.
Southern Area M Building M1 Building M1 was built of mudbrick with no apparent stone foundations, although occasionally some stones were found integrated into the construction of its walls. The mudbricks of this structure were brown to orange-brown and save for a few small whitish chips, they generally lacked visible inclusions, making their identification during excavation difficult. The general plan of the building was rectangular (outer dimensions 5.0 × 9.4 m, inner floor space 28 sq m) with what appear to have been rounded corners. However, these corners were all located within the unexcavated balks so the structure might have been elliptical, like that excavated in Stratum IV in Area L (see Plan 3.28). Only a small portion of the slightly rounded northern face of W712 was exposed, preserved up to five courses (Fig. 3.52). The eastern wall (W708) was also located mostly in the balk (Plan 3.8: Section 2-2), where it was preserved up to three courses. The continuation of this wall to the south (W23) was uncovered in Area B (Sq D6), where a short wall segment (W24) protruded from it at a right angle. These two walls and their associated surface (L218), also in Area B, lay directly below Phase IIIB and were definitively associated with the Stratum IV occupation (see below). The southern wall (W711) was preserved up to two courses; a later pit had cut into its southwestern segment (Fig. 3.53). The western wall (W705) was preserved up to four courses. Within the structure, two superimposed beaten-earth floors (Phases IVB, IVA) were discerned in its northern portion. The earlier floor (L7139), adjacent to the base of W705, was also observed in the southern portion of the building (L7082; Fig. 3.53; Plan 3.8: Section 1-1). The later resurfacing in Phase IVA (L7118/7133) included several small to mediumsized stones and a rounded installation of small stones and mortar, whose position along the central axis of the building suggests a function as a posthole or pillar base (Fig. 3.54).
90
AMIR GOLANI
W712
L7103
L7076
Fig. 3.52. Stratum IV remains in Sq C8, looking south. Wall 712 and Phase IVB and IVA Surfaces 7103 and 7076 respectively, outside Building M1, looking south.
W711 W710 W705 L7082
Fig. 3.53. Square C6 at the end of excavation, looking south. Stratum IV W711 cut by a later pit, and Stratum III Granary 7068 (W710) atop Stratum IV W705.
5
70 W
L7118
L7139
Fig. 3.54. Remains of Building M1 in Sq C7, looking south. Note the round installation on Phase IVA Floor 7118.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
91
Only one phase of beaten-earth surfaces (L7042, L7075, L7094, L7099, L7104; Plans 3.8: Section 1-1; 3.9) was revealed outside the building, except to the north, where Surface 7103, adjacent to the base of W712, was associated with Phase IVB (see below). South of the building, Surface 7094 was associated with W711 (Plan 3.8: Section 1-1), and to the west, Surface 7099 included small stones. Other Architectural Elements Several architectural features were found outside Building M1 to the north. A narrow mudbrick wall (W707), oriented east–west, was traced for 7.4 m (Plan 3.8: Section 3-3). The Phase IVB surface (L7103) that was associated with W712 was also associated with this wall. This surface was identified farther north, where it included a few small to medium-sized stones (L7116; Figs. 3.55, 3.56). At a later stage, this area was resurfaced (L7076/7078) and an L-shaped wall (W714) was added, preserved up to four courses. Wall 714 clearly lay upon
L7103 L7076
77 7700 W W
L7116
Fig. 3.55. Stratum IV remains in Sq C8, looking southwest.
7
70
W
W7
14
Fig. 3.56. Stratum IV remains in Sq C8, looking northeast. Note the dark Phase IIIB strip in the northern balk at left (arrow), overlying W707.
92
AMIR GOLANI
Phase IVB Surface 7116 and was therefore associated with Phase IVA (Sq C8; Plan 3.8: Section 1-1). Two resurfacings associated with Stratum IV were also evident to the east of W714. Phase IVB Surface 7113 was replaced in Phase IVA by L7036/7043 and L7106 (Sq D8; Plan 3.8: Section 2-2). North of W707, deep probes uncovered Stratum IV beaten-earth surfaces (L247, L7026/7029) and a mudbrick wall (W726) preserved up to two courses. Wall 726 was found below Stratum III Granary 7126 (W713; Fig. 3.57) and was separated from W707 by a 1.5 m gap (L7149/7157). A small probe below the floor of the Stratum III granary revealed that W726 did not continue farther north, and a Stratum IV beaten-earth surface was exposed (L7159; Fig. 3.58). Stratum III (Plan 3.10)
W713
W726
L7149
Fig. 3.57. Stratum IV Surface 7149/7157 to the south of W726, below Stratum III Granary 7126 (W713), looking north. W713
L7159
L7126
The remains of Stratum III in Area M were more fully exposed. These included a portion Fig. 3.58. A portion of Stratum IV of a walled compound in northern Area M and Surface 7159 below the base of Stratum III Granary 7126, looking east. a large open space with at least two granaries in southern Area M. Two clear stratigraphic phases (IIIB, IIIA) were identified in southern Area M, unlike the northern area where several architectural modifications were observed but only one clear habitation level was identified, associated with Phase IIIB. Northern Area M The Compound Nearly 18 m of the mudbrick enclosure wall (W715, W716) were traced on the northwestern side of Area M, although the bulk of the compound lay outside the excavated area. The southern segment of the wall (W715) was preserved up to one course, while the eastern wall (W716) was preserved up to two courses and the mudbricks were laid as headers. Two walls (W720, W721) abutted W716, but their function was not fully investigated. A succession of two beaten-earth surfaces was exposed in Sq B11; the lower surface (L7154) at the base of the wall was associated with Phase IIIB, and the Phase IIIA surface (L7142) included two short lines of medium-sized stones attached to the wall to form a small space or installation of unclear function. This Phase IIIA surface may have been uncovered in the adjoining square to the north (L7147). In Sq B10, another Phase IIIB surface (L7138) was identified adjacent to W715, and a similar Phase IIIB surface (L7131) lay immediately outside W715.
A
B
C
D 1
93
26.86
14
14
L7145 26.75
L7144
26.82
26.85
2 72
W721
26.85 W 26.77
13
L7110 27.20
13
W720
26.88
26.95 26.88
6 W71
12
Northern Area M
2
26.86
26.90 26.85
L7130 27.00
12
27.11 26.99
L7143
L7147
26.77
26.99
L7154 26.94 26.69
26.67
L7141 26.80
11 26.69
26.89
L7142
26.88
26.99 26.85
11
25
W7
76
26.96 26.85
24
27.00 26.91
26.71 26.68
W7
Compound
26.93 26.87
26.97 26.77
L7138 26.88
26.98 26.89
26.75
L7131
10
26.90
27.38
5
10
L7140
W715
L235
L221
27.25
27.10
27.47 27.25 27.33
L228
L7025 26.90
26.80
L7129
4
27.34
3
L7022 L7086 27.53 27.30
27.05
W703 L7023 L7092
L7007 27.46 L7017
26.85
L7059
27.25
27.25
L7053 26.90
L7084
26.90
26.90
W7
10
5 m A
B
04
27.17 27.03
L7039 L7056 27.16 27.04
27.05
27.02
9
70
W
27.15 27.03
7
L7030 27.04
L7034 27.30
L7068 26.47
6
L7048 L7066
Stratum III, Phase B 0
27.25
W7
2
27.05 26.85 27.05
L7081 L7012 L7045 L7016 L7049
27.18 26.90
L7098 L7114
8
26.84 26.68
W
27.01 26.63
27.29
3
26.99
6 70
27.30 27.23
L7033 L7035
L7055
6
L7097 L7105
L7032 L7037 27.30 L7096
27.35 27.28
Stratum III, Phase A
L7010 L7018 27.25 L7019 27.00 L7028
L7046 L7052 27.17
27.30
26.99
7
9
26.67
26.90
27.41 27.32 27.32
Southern Area M
27.25
L7126
27.20 27.38 26.66
L7024
27.50
4 27.46 27.36
5
W25
27.34
L7120
L7122
L7015 27.00
9
8
W713
L7011 L7013
27 02 26.47
27.00
C
Plan 3.10. Area M, Stratum III.
D
94
AMIR GOLANI
Open Area East of the Compound The area east of the compound was systematically sampled (Sqs C10–14, D11) and for the most part appears to have been an open area consisting of surface buildups but little architecture. Several beaten-earth surfaces covered with brown-gray debris and ash were attributed to Phase IIIB (L7140, L7141, L7143, L7144, L7145; Plans 3.8: Section 1-1; 3.10). In Sq C14, numerous burnt clay fragments were also found on Surface 7145, which appears to have been the southern continuation of Surface 4186 in Sq C15 of Area H. Only two beatenearth surfaces (L7110, L7130) can be attributed to Phase IIIA with any measure of certainty. Farther east, the remains of two mudbrick walls (W724, W725) were preserved up to one course high, but no clear surfaces were associated with them. It is unclear to which Stratum III phase they belong. Southern Area M Southern Area M, down to Area B in the south, also functioned primarily as an open area. It included two mudbrick granaries built in Phase IIIB that continued into Phase IIIA, and several wall fragments of unclear plan, attributed to one or the other phase. Phase IIIB Granary 7126 The northern granary (outer diam. 2.4 m, inner diam. 2.0 m) was built of a circular mudbrick wall (W713) preserved up to six courses (Fig. 3.59). It appears to have been partially sunken into the ground (two courses), yet most of it stood above ground. Within the granary was a beaten-earth floor with ash and a few small stones at its base (L7126), while outside was a beaten-earth surface (L7129) 0.24 m higher than the floor of the granary.
Fig. 3.59. Granary 7126 during excavation, looking east.
95
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Granary 7068 The southern granary was only partially exposed, as most of it lay outside the excavated area (reconstructed outer diam. 2.5 m, inner diam. 1.5 m). This granary was constructed of a circular mudbrick wall (W710) preserved up to five courses and partially sunken into the ground, cutting down to the Stratum IV remains (see Fig. 3.53). Within this structure was a beaten-earth floor (L7068), while outside was a beaten-earth surface 0.53 m higher than the floor inside (L7048/7066). Other Architectural Elements Between the two granaries described above was a beaten-earth surface of Phase IIIB (Sqs B–C/7–9, D8) covered by a thick buildup of dark gray debris (L235, L7015, L7019/7028, L7024, L7025, L7046/7052, L7053, L7084, L7096, L7097/7105, L7098/7114; Plans 3.8: Sections 1-1–5-5; 3.10). A few stones in the eastern part of Sq C7, possibly the remains of a wall, were associated with this surface. In Sq D7 to the east, two fragmentary mudbrick walls with no discernable stone foundations, preserved up to one course (W704, W709), formed an obtuse corner. Beatenearth surfaces were associated with the base of the walls to their south (L7030, L7039/7056) and north (L7045/7049). An installation (L7081) in the northwestern corner of this square cut down into Stratum IV (Fig. 3.60; Plan 3.8: Section 2-2). This feature, of unclear purpose, was built of two courses of mudbricks laid one atop the other on their long narrow sides to create a kind of bin, the top of which was associated with Surface 7045/7049. Within it were a few small stones.
W 70
4
L7081
L7036
W
70
9
L7030
L7045
Fig. 3.60. Phase IIIB remains in Sq D7, looking west. Note Installation 7081 in the northwestern corner of the square above Stratum IV Surface 7036.
96
AMIR GOLANI
Phase IIIA Granary 7126 In this phase, the floor of the Phase IIIB granary was raised over 0.5 m (L7120), and a new surface outside the structure (L7122) lay at the same level as that within (Plan 3.8: Section 2-2). Other Architectural Elements In this phase, Granary 7068 was dismantled and most of this area appears to have been resurfaced, while a few new architectural features were added. A semicircular mudbrick wall (W25), preserved up to two courses, delineated a small area within which was a beaten-earth surface (L228). Excavation immediately to the south revealed no continuation of this wall, although large amounts of mudbrick debris were discerned to its southwest. A beaten-earth surface (L221) with a crushed ceramic vessel was associated with W25 (Fig. 3.61; Plan 3.8: Section 5-5). Farther east, this surface was identified as L7011/7013 and L7122, the latter associated with Granary 7126. The Phase IIIA beaten-earth surface continued to the south (L7007/7017) with numerous ceramics and scattered stones upon it. In Sq C8, a portion of a mudbrick wall or installation of unclear plan (W703) was preserved up to two courses. North of this feature was a beaten-earth surface (L7022/7086; Plan 3.8: Section 3-3) and a similar surface (L7023/7092) strewn with ceramic fragments lay to its south (Fig. 3.62). In the southeastern corner of this square was a segment of a mudbrick wall preserved up to two courses (W706), although no continuation of this wall was discovered in any of the adjoining squares. Northwest of this wall, a beaten-earth surface (L7032/7037) incorporated some
L221
W25
Fig. 3.61. Phase IIIA remains in Sq B9, looking north. At upper right, a deep probe reached the basal dune.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
97
small to medium-sized stones within its make-up (L7037), between the Phase IIIB and IIIA surfaces, as well as a child burial (L7059) with several large ceramic fragments of various vessels placed around the interment (Figs. 3.63, 3.64). The stratigraphic position of this burial suggests that it was inserted into a shallow pit dug down from the Phase IIIA surface (Plan 3.8: Section 1-1). The Phase IIIA surface continued east and south (L7010/7018, L7012/7016, L7033/7035, L7034, L7055), and was identified above the Phase IIIB architectural remains in Sq D7 (Plan 3.8: Section 2-2) and above Granary 7068, indicating that the granary had been dismantled and ceased to function.
W703
Fig. 3.62. Buildup on Phase IIIA Surface 7023, south of W703, looking north.
Fig. 3.63. Burial 7059, between Phase IIIA and IIIB surfaces, encased within several large ceramic fragments of different vessels.
Fig. 3.64. Burial 7059 after removal of the upper ceramic fragments.
98
AMIR GOLANI
Area B (Plans 3.11–3.14) Area B is located in the center of the site, at the southern end of the main north–south section of the excavation (Fig. 3.65).7 In the southern part of Area B, the basal dune was exposed at 27.65 m asl, while 20 m to the north it was lower, at 26.80 m asl (Plan 3.11: Sections 1-1, 6-6, 7-7). In two probes in Area M, the basal dune was encountered at an even greater depth of 26.25 m asl in Sq B9 (below L247) and 26.40 m asl in Sq D12 (below L238; see Plan 3.8: Sections 2-2, 5-5), indicating that the occupation in Area B lay on the
D
6
C
E
4
F
W
W23
29
4
1
W2
6
6
8
W2
W24 20 W
0
1
W4
3
W27
5
7
3
W2
0
W34
2
2
5
W28
W2
5
2
W26
1
W4
W3
1
5 3
W3
4
W
30
W
2
W3
35
2
2
W36
5 m
6
C
7
1
0 D
Stratum IV
Stratum III, Phase A
Stratum V
Stratum III, Phase B
E
F
Stratum II
Plan 3.11. Area B, composite plan, Strata V–II and Sections 1-1–7-7.
7
See n. 6 above.
3
W
3
39
W37
W38
4
25 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
L 28 00
W28
L242 2A
L225 L240A
L312
L249
L233A
F6 L233B
L232B
L315
L248
L232A
F5
C2
W28
L297
L268
L322
L272
L326
L253
Basal dune
3-3
L208
E6
L282
E5
L309
2-2
L231
bones
1-1
L256
L255
L207
Basal dune
L223
W20
Burial
L306
W20 L258 9L237
3L209
L234
L286
L245
L204
D5
D6 L203
L244
W40 L261
Basal dune
45 L250
C4
Plan 3.11 (cont.). Area B, composite plan, Strata V–II and Sections 1-1–7-7.
L327
L214B L222
L214A
L283
L300 09
C3
C5
C5
W26 L229
L200
L241
L200
L219 L230
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
99
26 00
27 00
28 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
a
a
L242 L258
4-4
Basal dune
C5
L329
D2
L205
W20
L314
L256
L269
21 L217 L218
Basal dune
2W20 2
D5
W35 L276 W Basal dune une
W30
W23
L212
W L263
Sand
D6
L330
L239B
6'-6''
C4
Burial
6-6'
L289
7-7
L239A
L306
W24
D6
L279
W40 256 L256
L209
L273
L266
5-5
Basal dune
W W23
L217 L205
L205
D5
C3
D4
nes L244 Bones
L296
a
a
Plan 3.11 (cont.). Area B, composite plan, Strata V–II and Sections 1-1–7-7.
L275 L291
D3
26 00
27 00
28 00
L308
C2 W30 L297
100 AMIR GOLANI
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
101
Fig. 3.65. General view of Area B at the end of excavations, looking west.
very moderate northern-facing slope of a low east–west ridge that apparently protruded from the main north–south kurkar ridge to the west. Areas B and M were separated by a balk. The Phase IIIB surface in Area B abutting the northwestern corner of the compound (L217, see below) is identical to that in Area M in Sqs C6 and C–D7 (e.g., L7048/7066, etc.; see above). In addition, W23 and W24 in Area B were a continuation of Building M1 (Stratum IV; see above), and the surface (L218) associated with W23 and W24 was identified as Surface 7094 in Area M. The continuation of these architectural features and their associated surfaces provided a clear stratigraphic link between the two areas. Excavation in Area B identified two main occupation strata (IV, III), preceded by ephemeral remains designated here as Stratum V, and superseded by a post-habitation phase consisting of infant and child burials associated with Stratum II. Stratum V (Plan 3.12) This stratum was defined in six probes as sherd scatters within the loose, light brown sand upon the basal dune of the ridge that sloped down moderately from south to north. Stratum V was characterized by a localized and very thin layer of ash and small scatters of sherds, without any buildup of organic material, perhaps representing the remains of transient campsites that were quickly covered by shifting wind- and water-borne
102
AMIR GOLANI D
6
C W23 26.75 26.48
6
E
4
4
L227
W
26.55
1
26.62
25.25
26.90
26.25
3
5
7
L314 L329
5
6
L249 L265
26.80
L327
26.85
26.70
25.95
L241
L326
L261
26.95
L214B L222
26.48
3
L249
26.63
26.67 26.65
W24 26.75
L240B
26.66
29
L218
F
L310 26.69
26.75
L256 L258
L262
L272
26.70
26.61
5
L248
L283
L282
27.00
26.08
27.12 27.04
26.46
2
2
5 L254B 26.97
4
L284
L319
L250
4 L267
26.61
L318
27.57
L316
3
3
27.66
L269 27.57
L264
L293
L321
27.67
27.17
27.67
2
2
L294 27.84
L260 27.75
6
C
7
1
L263
D
L295 27.76
E
0
5 m
F
Stratum IV Stratum V
Plan 3.12. Area B, Strata V–IV.
sand, or a pre-construction leveling phase of Stratum IV. In one probe (Sq D5), another thin, horizontal ash layer was uncovered 0.5 m within below the surface of the basal dune (L314; Plan 3.11: Section 6-6) and below this was a 0.2 m thick layer of sterile sand (L329) overlying a sterile layer of brown marly sand (L330). Stratum IV (Plan 3.12) In the northern Sqs C–F/5–6, the Stratum IV remains were somewhat more substantive than those to the south. The occupation buildup here reached a depth of approximately 0.3 m (Plan 3.11: Section 2-2) and included several rounded pits (L282, L283, L327) and associated beatenearth surfaces (L214B/222, L248, L249, L256, L258, L261, L272, L310, L326; Plan 3.11:
103
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Sections 2-2, 3-3). In Sq C5, a large conical pit (L241; diam. 1.9 m, depth 1.3 m) was discovered immediately below the base of a Stratum III wall (W27; Plans 3.11: Section 1-1; 3.12). The only architectural remains of Stratum IV were two mudbrick walls (W23, W24) forming a right-angled corner on the northern edge of the area, apparently part of Building M1 (see above). They were preserved up to two courses, with no stone foundations (Fig. 3.66). East of these walls was a beaten-earth surface (L218; Plan 3.11: Section 4-4) with some small stones and pottery. The surface was clearly observed to run under Stratum III W20, and to appear again to the east (Plan 3.11: Section 3-3). Another small wall segment (W29), preserved up to one course, was associated with a beaten-earth surface to its east (L227; Fig. 3.67).
W20
W24
W23
L218
Fig. 3.66. Strata IV and III remains in Sq D6, looking south. Note W23 and W24 of Building M1 and the associated surface (L218).
L327 L214B
W21
L227
Fig. 3.67. Stratum IV Surfaces 227 and 214B/222, under Stratum III W21, connected Pit 327 and W29.
W 29
W28
104
AMIR GOLANI
In the higher, southern Sqs C–F/2–4, the remains were sparser, compose of debris discovered in a probe (L319), and two shallow, rounded pits (L284, L321) dug into the sands. These pits may be associated with several beaten-earth surfaces (L254B, L260, L264, L269, L293, L294, L295, L316, L318) revealed below walls and surfaces of Stratum III. These surfaces sometimes included small patches of pavement and often bore concentrations of small to medium-sized stones alongside ceramics, burnt mudbrick fragments and decayed mudbricks, the latter often appearing as patches of packed, light brown soil with numerous white calcite concretions. Stratum III (Plans 3.13, 3.14) In Stratum III, a large, roughly oval compound (15 × 22 m, inner area c. 270 sq m) was bounded by a stone and mudbrick wall, 0.4–0.8 m wide, preserved 0.2–0.5 m high. As it was traceable for over 66 m, the wall was assigned various numbers along its course (W20, W21, W28, W30, W31, W36, W37, W38; Figs. 3.65, 3.68). In its northern portions (W20, W21, W28), the wall was preserved up to two–three courses of light cream-gray mudbricks containing many white calcite concretions. The mudbricks in the northern portions were usually laid as headers across the width of the wall (Fig. 3.69), yet in some places they were arranged as headers on one face paralleled by a row of stretchers on the other face. The southern portions of the wall, built mainly of mudbricks and preserved up to five courses, were set on an irregular, intermittent stone foundation of small to medium-sized kurkar stones. An intermittent level of small stones was also incorporated within the mudbrick courses, probably to further stabilize its construction (Fig. 3.70).
W28
21
W
W2
0
Fig. 3.68. The northern part of the enclosure, looking east.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
105
W28
Fig. 3.69. Wall 28, looking south. In this section of the wall, the mudbricks were laid stretcher fashion across the entire width of the wall.
21
W
Fig. 3.70. Wall 21, looking northeast.
The compound followed the natural slope of the dune, with the base of the southern wall at a higher level than that of the northern wall. Three gaps in the enclosure wall appear to be entrances located in the east, south and west. Only a few partition walls were discerned, indicating that the compound was not roofed, although it could have been shaded by an awning. Two phases of use were identified within this structure. Phase IIIB (Plan 3.13) The Compound The entire circumference of the enclosure wall was erected in the earlier phase, along with several short, curved mudbrick walls within the compound (W32, W33, W34, W35, W39, W40), most of which abutted the enclosure wall. They were usually preserved no higher than one course, only a few centimeters in height, and except for their slightly lighter color
106
AMIR GOLANI
D
6
C
E
4
4
0 W4
20
L207 L255 27.00
7
W
1
1
27.05 26.76
27.40 27.02
W26
L244
26.81 26.86 27.47 26.90
26.76
3
27.12 27.00 27.27 27.13
L232B 27.25
L268 27.10
27.55 27.25
2 5 L211
L274
27.25 27.20
27.18
L254A
W4
26.82
27.16
W
1
4 Industrial area
27.24
27.67 27.45
27.04
L328 L302
27.09
27.47
L299 L307
27.17 27.11
27.12
27.21
L313
27.33
L308
27.42
27.57
27.83
27.64 28.15 27.95
6
7
1
L259
28.10 27.93
27.98
27.92
D
27.96 27.76
L278
L280
28.10 27.92
27.91
E
27.97 27.62
28.20 28.13
W36
2
L285
27.97 27.88
27.84
L297
C
28.23 27.93
27.93
L251
3
L331
L288
27.87 27.82
35
2
L276
2
W3
W
30
W
27.90 27.83
27.66
27.85 27.60
27.53 27.40
L315
L311
27.61
L275 L291
L296
39
L289
L309
W
L325
W38
27.05
4
27.24 27.18
L257
L273
3
5
26.95
L239B
26.84
27.03 27.00
26.94
L286
26.94 26.69
L245
27.15
Base of smelting installations
L281
26.90
6
27.50 27.15
26.95
33
2
L322
W3 4
26.82 26.91 26.69
L233B
27.00
27.30 27.00
L223 L229 L237
W2 0
W27
L236
L214A
W28
26.82
5
W2
27.40 26.95
5
L230
27.15
27 07 26 80
27.06 26.86
8 W2
26.99 26.77
6
L225
26.84
26.82
26.90
3
L224
L206
L217
F
27.97
0
5 m
F
Stratum III, Phase B
Plan 3.13. Area B, Stratum III, Phase B.
and numerous calcite concretions, were difficult to discern from the surrounding matrix. The poor preservation of these walls may be due to renovations during Phase IIIA, when most of the inner walls were dismantled and covered with new surfaces (see below). In the southern part of the compound, W32 appears to have functioned as a screen wall directly opposite the southern entrance to the compound, and a similar wall (W33) partially screened off the eastern entrance (Fig. 3.71). Other walls (W35, W39, W40) were attached to the enclosure wall creating small spaces of unclear function. Wall 40, built of one row of rectangular mudbricks and preserved up to three courses, appears to be an extension of W20. Wall 34 (Sq E5) is the only inner wall that is not connected to the enclosure wall, and may have delineated a small storage area.
107
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W28
33
W
Fig. 3.71. Screen W33 near the eastern entrance into the compound, looking north.
Inside the compound, the beaten-earth surface attributed to Phase IIIB bore concentrations of pottery, small stones and evidence of burning activity (L207, L214A, L232B, L233B, L239B, L244, L251, L254A, L257, L268, L273, L274, L275/291, L276, L281, L288, L289, L302, L307, L313, L322, L328). A surface with similar concentrations was exposed outside the compound (L206, L217, L224, L225, L229, L236, L245, L259, L280, L285, L296, L297, L309, L311, L315). Surface 217, abutting the northwestern corner of the compound, continued into southern Area M (Sqs C6, C–D7). The Industrial Area Inside the Compound: A wide, 10 m gap was observed in the western portion of the compound’s enclosure wall. West of this opening (Sqs C3–4), a thick buildup of dark gray-black burnt debris lay on the beaten-earth surface (L239B, L245, L296, L309; Plan 3.11: Section 1-1). This debris contained slag, crucible fragments and prills, apparently the refuse dump of a metallurgical industry that was concentrated within an oval area in the gap in the compound wall. The oval area (5 × 10 m), although not completely excavated, appears to have been slightly sunken into the ground (Fig. 3.72). It was bounded by W41, which was made of burnt mudbricks. The oval area was full of decayed and burnt mudbrick fragments, as well as several stone concentrations that also exhibited signs of burning. These stone clusters, together with the numerous burnt mudbrick fragments, are probably the remains of dismantled or decayed smelting installations. Alongside these installations, four ceramic bowls and two complete basalt bowls sat on the surfaces in an upright position (L289, L328; Fig. 3.73; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming; Rosenberg, forthcoming), which may have been connected to the metallurgical activities. Immediately to the north of this activity area was a rectangular mudbrick installation (L286) whose function is unclear. The position of this industrial area on the western side of the compound was probably not coincidental, as this side was open to the sea and a gap or local depression in the kurkar
108
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.72. The oval-shaped industrial area on the western side of the compound, looking east.
ridge to the west may have facilitated the sea breezes to improve the draft. On the surface northwest of the refuse dump (Sq C5; L229, L236), quantities of ash, presumably metallurgical waste, and decayed mudbricks were found. This surface connected the compound (W20) with two mudbrick walls (W26, W27) preserved up to two courses. The buildup of ash appears to have damaged W26, causing it to collapse (Plan 3.11: Section 2-2). Phase IIIA (Plan 3.14) The Compound Fig. 3.73. Several complete vessels found in the industrial area. At lower right, a complete basalt bowl The large compound continued to function and to its right, a complete ceramic V-shaped bowl. At upper center, another ceramic bowl near the wall. in this phase, with some modifications. The industrial area on the western side of the compound may have continued in use, although no clear Phase IIIA surfaces were discerned; L266, L279 and L317 are understood as burnt-debris buildup. In addition, the wide entrance facing west was constricted by the construction of W31 and W37, both built of two rows of square mudbricks and preserved up to one course. These walls were erected directly atop the Phase IIIB dark gray-black layer of metallurgical debris (L239B, L245, L309); however, as this same gray-black matrix was also found next to these walls, it is
109
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY D
6
C
E
4
4
L202
L205
27.18
27.10
27.35 27.12
2
1
L333
27.30 27.25
L253
27.45
L242
27.15 27.00
5
2
L332 W28
W3 1
5
27.55 27.45
1 W4
27.21
3
L232A
27.30
27.25
L220 L234
4
6
27.35
L213
27.15
2
27.26
27.25
L212
27.20
27.20
Smelting installation L233A
L204 L209
W2
L200 L219
27.39 27.18
26.90
27.25
27.40 27.20
5
7
27.36 27.11
L210 27.30 27.22
5
0 W4
27.25
L304
L292
L208
L231
L203
27.25
27.45 26.95
27.15
0
W2
L306 27.40
3
1 W2
8 W2
L305
6
F
4
L239A L266
27.67 27.45
L279
L323
27.93 27.86
L298
L300
3
27.76
27.25
W38
W37
L317
3
L287 27.96
27.48 27.35
27.97 27.65
W
30
2
28.09 27.86
28.10 27.93
28.15 27.95
6
1
7
D
28.20 28.13
W36 27.97 27.88
28.10 27.92
C
L301
28.23
5 m
0 E
2
L277
F
Stratum II Stratum III, Phase A
Plan 3.14. Area B, Stratum III, Phase A and Stratum II.
evident that the dumping of refuse continued after their construction as well. The two walls (W26, W27) west of the compound were no longer in use. The compound did not change its function, and the metal-refining activities of Phase IIIB apparently continued directly into Phase IIIA, although most of the internal curved walls of Phase IIIB were dismantled to create a more open space. Only W40 continued in use. One new wall (W22) was added onto W20, built of large mudbricks preserved to only one course high. North of W40 and adjacent to the compound wall (W21) were several brown mudbricks with a light gray fill between them, which may be the remnants of an additional wall that had collapsed, leaving only its debris. Next to this concentration was an oblong pit full of small stones (L333).
110
AMIR GOLANI
Within the compound, a beaten-earth surface was discerned above those of Phase IIIB (L203, L204, L208, L209, L212, L213, L231, L232A, L233A, L253, L287, L298; Plan 3.11: Sections 1-1–6-6). This surface was revealed primarily in the northern part of the structure, as the southern part was largely eroded. Beaten-earth surfaces were noted outside and adjacent to the structure as well (L200/219, L202, L205, L234, L277, L300). Metallurgical Installations in the Stratum III Compound A relatively large number of copper-smelting installations comprising small, conical pits lined with small stones and clay (see Chapter 4) were associated with the Stratum III compound in Area B. At the northern edge of the compound, a solitary smelting installation was associated with Phase IIIA (E–F6 balk). To the south, in Sq E5, the bases of another two smelting installations were found on Phase IIIB Surface 268 (see Plan 3.13). Thus, the metallurgical activities were not confined to the oval industrial area on the western side of the compound, but were also carried out in other places within this compound. Stratum II (Plan 3.14) In the final phase, the compound appears to have gone out of use and the area was subsequently used as a burial ground. Seven or eight burials were found throughout the excavated area, five of which were cut into the enclosure wall, indicating that these interments are to be attributed to a post-occupation phase. Two burials (L210, L332) were inserted into shallow pits. Each burial consisted of a solitary interment: five infant and two child burials (see Nagar, forthcoming). Most were found in a flexed position, sometimes within a ceramic vessel (L301, L304, L305, L323) or covered with one or more large ceramic fragments (L306). A cluster of four or five (including L292) was concentrated around W20 (L210, L292, L304, L305, L306). Burial 210 (Sq C5). A few deteriorated fragments of an articulated burial of a child in a flexed position were found in a pit west of W20, a few centimeters above the Phase IIIA surface. Burial(?) 292 (Sq D5). A medium-sized storage jar missing its neck and rim was embedded in W20, but did not contain any bones. It was placed in a shallow pit that cut into the southeastern face of W20, and is to be associated with the same phase as the other jar burials. As other jar burials in W20 contained bones, it is unclear if here they had completely disintegrated, or perhaps this was not a burial but an offering associated with nearby Burial 306. Burial 301 (Sq E2). This burial of an infant in a storage jar cut into the base of W36 (Figs. 3.74, 3.75). The neck and rim of the jar were missing, probably removed to facilitate insertion of the burial. No building remains were found over the burial, thus it was not a deposit connected to the building of the wall but was inserted into it.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
111
Burial 304 (Sq D6). This burial of an infant in a medium-sized storage jar partially cut into the southeastern face of W20 (Fig. 3.76). The jar was lying on its side and missing its neck and rim. Burial 305 (Sq D6). This burial of an infant in a medium-sized storage jar partially cut into the western face of W20 (Fig. 3.77). The jar was lying on its side and missing the neck and rim. Burial 306 (Sq D6). Two large, slightly overlapping fragments of ceramic vessels covered a child burial that partially cut into the western face of W20. Burial 323 (Sq F3). This burial of an infant in a storage jar cut into the western face of W38. Just south of this burial jar was a very fragmentary, medium-sized juglet ringed with several small stones that was also inserted into the wall.
Fig. 3.74. Burial 301 cutting into W36, looking southwest.
Fig. 3.75. Burial 301 prior to its opening.
Fig. 3.76. Burial 304 cutting into W20.
112
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.77. Burial 305 partially cut into W20, looking south.
Burial 332 (Sq F5). A skull fragment and several bones of a small child were concentrated in a pit that cut through the Stratum III remains down to Stratum IV.
Area K (Plans 3.15–3.17) Area K is located immediately east of Area B (Fig. 3.78). Bulldozer work prior to excavation had removed nearly all the topsoil in this area, exposing the dark debris and outlines of several mudbrick walls in the archaeological layer. These leveling activities also cut into some of the archaeological strata, although the full extent of the damage is unclear. To the south of Area K, modern development had completely removed the archaeological remains (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3). At the start of the excavations, most of the area was flat, with a slight descent toward the north and a very moderate ascent toward the east. As in Area B, the archaeological remains in Area K were located on the northern slope of a low east–west ridge that protruded from the main north–south kurkar ridge to the west. Excavation within this area revealed extensive remains of two main strata (III, II; Plan 3.15). Although limited evidence of Stratum IV was noted in Area B to the west (see above), it was nearly absent in Area K. Excavation in most of the squares in Area K reached the basal dune, where a shallow occupation buildup began in Stratum III. In most instances, when an artifact-bearing debris layer was discerned below the Stratum III surfaces, it was extremely poor in finds.8 While such loci may possibly be associated
Area K was initially planned as an eastward extension from Area B. However, the shallow depth of occupation remains exposed in the initial stages of excavation led to a change in strategy in favor of a broad lateral exposure. Time constraints did not allow for the full exposure of the large architectural units. 8
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
113
Fig. 3.78. General view of Area K, looking west. Areas B and M, at left.
with an earlier occupation, they could also have resulted from construction leveling for the foundation of Stratum III in this area. Only in the eastern part of Area K did excavation in a few probes below the earliest Stratum III architecture and surfaces reveal a thick debris buildup of nearly 0.5 m above a dark layer founded on the basal dune (Sqs L5, M4, O5; Plan 3.15: Sections 5-5–7-7, 10-10). Time constraints precluded further investigation of this layer. Area K is separated from Area B by a balk. The contemporaneity of these two areas in Stratum III may be established first and foremost by the architectural layout exposed in both areas: two compounds with similar alignment and construction techniques separated by a north–south alleyway c. 3 m wide. The beaten-earth surfaces in the alleyway in both areas connected with one another (see below). Stratum III (Plan 3.16) As in most other excavated areas of the site, the Stratum III remains were the most prominent, comprising a northern and southern compound separated by a wide open area from another concentration of architectural remains (Building K4) on the eastern side of Area K. Two building phases were identified in the northern and eastern parts of the area (Plan 3.16).
114
AMIR GOLANI
G
H
I
J
K
L
04
W5
W521
7
6
W517
W518
7
W515
5
W52
6
0
Structure K5
4
Building K1 W539
W511
W530
W5
07
W
50
8
W505
3
Building K2
2
2
W501
50
W
W506
1
1
1
W506
2
W503
06
W5
G
H
W
Structure K3
1
50
9
W51
4
W502
I
J
K
Plan 3.15. Area K, composite plan, Strata III–II and Sections 1-1–11-11.
L
115
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
N
M
O
P
4
7
32
W5
6
6 W51
3
W510
Structure K4
9
11
8
10
8
W534
W523
W537
6
W5
3
W51
5
W531 W538
W525
19
5
W535
W526
W536
W524
W522
W527
7
Juglet with W528 dentalium shells W533
8
4
W529
W52
W540
5
11
4
10
9
3
3
2
Stratum II Stratum III, Phase A Stratum III, Phase B 5 m
0 M
N
O
P
Plan 3.15 (cont.). Area K, composite plan, Strata III–II and Sections 1-1–11-11.
1
27 00
28 00
29 00
27 00
28 00
29 00
27 00
28 00
29 00
2 27 00
28 00
29 00
2 27 00
28 0 28 00
2 29 00
L5122
W501
L5147
L5079 L5088
Basal dune
W519
N5
Basal dune
L5110
M4
33 L5138
L5138
L5127
L5106
L5152A
L5078
3-3
Basal dune
Basal dune
L5127 ne
L5121
0 W508
L L5043
Ba L5135
M5
L5 68 L5068
J3 J3
L 6 L5062
50 L5021
G G2
L5110
M4
0 L5023
L L5019
L5099
N4
L5108
M5
W519
L5085
Basal dune
W501
I33
W501
H H2
5-5
2-2
L5134
L5114
5 W530
W533
W535
W 3 W530
L 6 L5160
W515
Basal dune
L5078
N4
W537
L5106
078 L5152A
O4
H33
L5
50 L5021
5 3 L5032
W538 W528
27 00
28 00 5106
15 A 29 00
L5061
5 3 L5032
L5181
1-1 H
6-6
Basal dune
L 03 L5031
L5048 -1
I2
W525
P4
K5
L5088 L51
L5103
L5113
L5119
L5122
L5142
4-4
Basal dune
L5079
N5
G3 G3 L L5064
5 0 L5005
L L5140
W501
L L5018
J J2
L5147
L5150
W516
N6 L5082
116
26 00
27 00
28 00
727 0 00
a
a
5152B
L5177
L5148
L5087
6 N6
O4
L5164
L5155
L5178
O5
Basal Basal duned
5150 L5150
082 L5082
K5
L5 L5123
W W517
Basal dune
L5100 L50L5 7
L5170
L 828 0 00
929 0 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
2 27 00
2 28 00
2 29 00
A L5169A
W528
10-10
M6 M6
L5165
L5170
5L5126 26
W512
L5 L5134
L5 L5114
L5155
L5178
O5
L5149 5 51
P5
L5
L5111
L5170
L5164
7-7'
27 00
28 00
29 00
727 0000
828 0000
929 0000
L5 L5135
L L5121
M5
O4
5113 L5113
5L5088 88 N5
L5 L5138
L5 L5127
L5169
550 N5
Plan 3.15 (cont.). Area K, composite plan, Strata III–II and Sections 1-1–11-11.
L5118 L5182
-8 8-8 L5145 W513
5 6 W516
L
7'-7''
W W515
L5 L5103
11-11
W528
a
O5
528 W528
5085 L5085 N4
507 4L N4
L5164
5085 L5085
L5 a2 L5122
L5 L5079
L5178 W538 L5155 W528 L5170 W531
9 9-9
512 W52 L5122 5147 L5147
5099 L5099
5L5113 1 3L W513 W5 513
L5 L5088 L5 L5147
L5087 W537 L5148
5079 L5079 L
W W516
N5
5L5152A 5 A
5078 L5078
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
117
118
AMIR GOLANI
Phase IIIB The Northern Compound This compound, just east of the large compound in Area B, was not fully exposed, but it can be reconstructed as a large rectangular compound (19 × 23 m, inner area c. 420 sq m), with two buildings (K1, K2) in its southern half (Fig. 3.79). Most of the northern half of the compound was not excavated. The compound was bounded by W518 to the west, W504 to the north, W507 to the east and W501 to the south, all built of mudbrick material and preserved no higher than one course. The corners were rounded, and in several segments a foundation of small to medium-sized stones was exposed, although this does not appear to have been a consistent feature. Only a small portion of W504, forming a corner with W518, was uncovered (Fig. 3.80). Within this rounded corner, a beaten-earth surface (L5162) was associated with the base of both walls and founded on the basal dune. Excavations to the east did not uncover the eastern continuation of W504, although remains of a habitation buildup on a beatenearth surface (L5163), presumably within the area of the compound, were exposed, also on the basal dune. Wall 507 was largely missing, possibly dismantled with the construction of Stratum II Structure K5 (see below). A small remnant of this wall formed a rounded corner with W501 (Sq K3). Wall 501 was uncovered primarily during the dismantlement of the southern balk of three successive squares (H–J3). Portions of this wall were constructed of mudbrick, yet
Fig. 3.79. General view of the western portion of Area K, looking north. At center, the northern compound; at lower center, the exposed part of the southern compound. At far left, Area B, parallel to the western wall of the northern compound of Area K. Note the large diagonal bulldozer cut in upper center.
119
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
most of the wall was revealed as a non-continuous line of small to medium-sized stones that apparently comprised the foundations of a mudbrick superstructure. An entrance lay just north of the rounded corner formed by W501 in the southwestern corner of the compound (Sq G3; Fig. 3.81). An L-shaped screening wall (W505), preserved up to one course high, stood just outside the entrance, creating an indirect entrance into the compound. Inside the compound, the entrance was further obstructed by the western wall (W530) of Building K1, creating a narrow passage between the building and the compound’s outer wall. Within this passage, a beaten-earth surface (L5112, L5160; Plans 3.15: Section 2-2; 3.16) founded on the basal dune was associated with the base of the compound’s and
4
50
W W518 L5125 L5168
Fig. 3.80. The northwestern corner of the northern compound, looking east. Note that the base of W518 was not continuously built of stone, but had segments of mudbrick only. At lower right, Burial 5168.
W511
1
50
W
W518 W505
Fig. 3.81. The entrance into the northern compound, looking east. The Phase IIIA modification, W511, apparently blocked the entrance into the compound.
120
AMIR GOLANI
G
H
04
26.92 26.86
L5124 L5116 27.11 L5120
L5125
27.13
W518
27.22
27.27 27.17
7
27.21 27.18
L5105 27.15
5
Northern Compound
27.21 27.14
L5123
27.83
L5095
L5134
27.31
27.85
L5107 27.15
L5176
28.06 28.00
W5
27.80
27.90 27.70
27.94 27.80
27.77 27.72
L5062
27.71
2
27.81 27.71
28.02 27.89
L5048 L5080
28.16 27.96
28.30
28.49 28.33
28.31 28.17
28.12
28.20 28.05
28.19
28.18
L5013 L5038
2
L5018 L5140
28.39 28.18
L5029
W502
28.29
28.30 28.17
Smelting installations 28.34
28.30
L5028
28.37 28.12
28.10 28.29 28.08
1
L5037 L5047
28.25
28.60 28.42
L5046
L5022
L5022
28.49
L5057
L5026
28.20
L5027 L5052
28.45
28.42
03 W5
28.34 28.23
28.60 28.51
W506
28.43
W506
28.13 27.93
L5067 L5072
28.21 27.95
28.15 28.04
W501
L5032
6 W50
W51 4
1
L5067 L5073
28.01 27.83
L5031
28.04
Building K2
28.08 28.02
W501
27.83
28.37 28.30
27.82
27.85
L5061
01
27.88 27.50
L5023
27.70
L5017 L5034
07
W530
27.90
28.01
L5068
28.02
27.74
L5160
W511
L5064
L5161
L5096
W5
27.99 27.79
27.80 27.70
8
W505
27.85
27.55
1
Building K1
27.42 27.34 27.88 27.82
W539
L5071
L5119
2
27.60 27.42
27.50 27.42
27.32
27.53 27.39
27.49 27.37
27.56 27.44
L5112
50
27.34 27.30
27.40
W
8
L5094 27.53
4
L5175
27.45 27.40
6
27.46 27.44
27.37
28.53 27.43
09
27.30
W51
L5109
L5181
27.40
W520
28.63
27.21
W5
27.25 27.13
3
W507
6
L
27.33 27.20
W521
27.10
L5168
26.98 26.89
K
L5163
L5162
26.91 26.95 26.82
27.17 27.06
J
W504
26.89 26.83
W5
7
I
Southern Compound
28.46 28.35
L5042 L5060
Structure K3 G
H
I
J
Plan 3.16. Area K, Stratum III.
K
L
121
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
M
N
O
P
7
27.88 27.43
4
27.65 27.33
L5173 32
27.36
L5150
W5
6
27.37
Building K4
27.60
L5147 27.54
27.67 27.55
27.90
27.73 27.62
27.90 27.65
19
W5
5
W540 28.19
28.15
W538
28.05 27.58
27.55
27.90
L5152A
L5169B
9
3
10
W528
7
L5165
27.36 27.69 27.37 27.68 27.63
L5149
27.89 27.85 27.71 27.90 27.85 27.78 28.03 27.62
27.91 27.76
Smelting installation
W525
5
28.12 28.02 27.98 27.91
L5142
27.85
5 27.88 27.75
27.95
4
27.94 27.86
27.98
27.84
27.95
4
28.52 27.97
L5148 L5152B
27.35
27.33 27.60
8
28.22 27.95
L5110
L5143 27.52 L5154
W529
28.06 27.86
27.56 27.41
W526
L5182
W52
L5106 L5183
27.44 27.32 27.91 27.56
6 27.84 27.62 27.93 27.59
27.32
W531 W534
L5135 L5138
27.70 27.50
W512 27.91
27.98 27.93
L5169A L5177
11
27.75
27.78
W527
Smelting L5113 installation 27.75 27.81
27.43
27.69 27.35 L5155 27.51 27.51 L5164
W524
L5135 L5138
L5170 27.49
W533
9
27.64 27.56
W536
3
10
8
11
8
3
L5036 L5045 28.45
2
Stratum III, Phase A Stratum III, Phase B 5 m
0
M
N
O
Plan 3.16 (cont.). Area K, Stratum III.
P
1
122
AMIR GOLANI
the building’s walls. This surface continued to slope down to the north (L5107, L5124), associated with the base of W518. Another beaten-earth surface (L5017/5034) exposed in the southeastern corner of the compound was associated with the base of the enclosure wall. This peculiar arrangement of a screen wall outside the compound entrance, and the positioning of a building immediately across from the entrance inside, does not appear to have been the result of haphazard planning. One possible explanation for this is that they provided protection from the strong westerly winds entering the compound. Building K1. Although only partially exposed, Building K1 appears to represent an elongated, possibly elliptical structure oriented on a north–south axis (6.0 × 10.5 m, inner floor space of c. 36 sq m). The northern apse of the building was fully exposed, delineated by W520, built of mudbricks incorporating some small to medium-sized stones (Fig. 3.82). The eastern wall of the building was not excavated, its line only suggested by the eastern curve of the apse formed by W520. The western wall (W530), partially uncovered, was constructed in a similar manner to W520. At its southern end, W530 was observed to bend into an apse whose curvature was sharper than that of its northern counterpart. The abrupt cut off at the eastern end of W530 suggests the existence of an entrance here. Within the building was a beaten-earth floor (L5061, L5161, L5175) associated with the base of the walls, which included some randomly placed stones. In the center of the northern apse, a rounded concentration of stones, partially uncovered, suggests the base of a pillar to support the roof. In the southern apse, a polygonal arrangement of mudbricks positioned upright on their sides and encircling another mudbrick lying flat, apparently served a similar function (Fig. 3.83). Building K2. This building, to the east of Building K1, is elliptical in plan, with an inner floor space of approximately 11.5 sq m. Its narrow mudbrick wall (W508) was preserved up to two courses (Fig. 3.84). The southern wall of the structure was incorporated into W501. The beaten-earth floor within this building (L5068) incorporated some small stones.
8
51 W
W539
L5175
W520
Fig. 3.82. The northern apse (W520) of Building K1, looking south.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
123
Fig. 3.83. A mudbrick pillar base in the southern part of Building K1.
Fig. 3.84. Building K2 in the southeastern quarter of the compound, looking northwest.
North of Building K2, a small segment of a beaten-earth surface (L5096) was revealed, and to the west another surface (L5023), founded on the basal dune within the open space, separated the two buildings in the compound. Alleys Two alleys separated the northern compound from other compounds to its west and south. To the west, the compound was separated from the Area B compound by a narrow, north–south alley, 2.5–3.0 m wide, that sloped slightly down to the north (Fig. 3.85). It was bounded by W28–W38 of Area B to the west and W518 of the Area K northern compound to the east. The beaten-earth surface within the alley (L5105, L5109, L5119, L5125) was associated
124
AMIR GOLANI
W
W518
28
4
50
W
Fig. 3.85. The alley separating the northern compound of Area K (left) from that of Area B (right), looking south.
with the base of W518 and founded on the basal dune. Removal of this surface in Sq G6 exposed an infant burial (L5168) embedded in the basal dune, within in a large ceramic fragment covered with another large pottery sherd (see Figs. 3.80, 3.86). An east–west alley (1.5–2.0 m wide) separated the northern compound from the southern one. The alley was bounded by W501 to the north and W506 of the southern compound (Fig. 3.87). Between these two Fig. 3.86. Burial 5168 after removal walls was a beaten-earth surface founded on of the ceramic cover. the basal dune and associated with the base of both walls (L5013/5038, L5018/5140, L5032, L5048/5080, L5062; Plans 3.15: Section 1-1; 3.16). The Southern Compound The partial remains of another compound, with a structure (K3) and storage installations, lay to the south of the compound described above. The northern wall (W506) of this compound, built of mudbrick interspersed with scattered stones, was traced for 23 m with several features adjacent to it. The continuation of this enclosure to the south was completely destroyed by modern development prior to excavation. Unlike the northern compound, only one clear habitation level was identified here.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
125
W501 Building K2
07
3
W5
50
W506
W
L5026 L50 26
Fig. 3.87. The alley between the northern and southern compounds, looking west. At right, Building K2 of the northern compound; at left, Granary 5026 of the southern compound.
Structure K3. In the northwestern portion of the compound, a few scanty and disjointed remains may possibly be reconstructed as a structure of some kind. On its north, a clear line of mudbricks preserved up to one course high and oriented east–west (W502) was associated with a concentration of stones and mudbricks that appears to form a curved wall to the south (W509). Wall 502 may have been incorporated into the construction of W506, just as W508 of Building K2 was incorporated into the compound W501. A short wall consisting of two rows of small to medium-sized stones (W509) and incorporating a large fragment of a basalt bowl, may be the continuation of W502 in Sq I1. Another wall segment (W514), similar to W509, may be the western wall of the structure. Within the area of Structure K3 was a beaten-earth floor (L5042/5060, L5067/5072) that incorporated two smelting installations west of W509 (Fig. 3.88). East of W514 was a similar beaten-earth surface (L5067/5073). Storage Installations. East of Structure K3, two installations were exposed. Granary 5026 (outer diam. 2.3 m, inner diam. 1.75 m) was comprised of a mudbrick wall (W503) partially sunken into the basal dune, and preserved up to nine courses (see Figs. 3.87, 3.89). It was found full of loose gray debris on a floor (L5026) that sloped down toward the center. Outside the upper courses of the granary was a beaten-earth surface (L5022) founded on the basal dune and associated with the base of W506. This surface continued to the west (L5028) and east (L5022, L5027/5052, L5036/5045).
126
AMIR GOLANI
W509
L5042
Fig. 3.88. Smelting installations embedded in Floor 5042/5060, looking east. Note the large basalt bowl fragment in W509.
L5053
L5054
W503
Fig. 3.89. Stratum III Granary 5026, with Stratum II Burial 5053 in the center and adjacent Stratum II Burial Cist 5054, looking west.
East of Granary 5026, the outline of a rounded pit was observed from the level of Surface 5027/5052. Excavation within a small portion of this pit to over 1.2 m below the L5027 surface revealed a fill of loose, light brown-gray debris (L5057). At the bottom of the pit and below the debris, a possible curved mudbrick wall was preserved up to three courses. The most plausible explanation suggests that this was a large, deep pit excavated in order to accommodate a silo. The wall would thus have belonged to a silo that was apparently abandoned after its initial stages of construction, and then the pit was intentionally or naturally filled with surrounding debris. Open Area In the space extending some 15 m east of the northern compound, excavation in several randomly positioned squares (L3, M4, K–M5, N6) revealed no architectural remains
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
127
associated with Stratum III, indicating the existence of an open area. To the north of the southern compound, in Sq L3, was a beaten-earth surface covered with dark ash and organic debris (L5037/5047). Due to the northward descent of the basal topography, this surface was nearly 0.2 m lower than the base of W506 in the south. Farther north, in a small probe (L5123) below Stratum II W515 and W517 (Sq K5), this beaten-earth surface was identified even lower, founded on the basal dune (Plan 3.15: Section 7-7). It was Fig. 3.90. Burial 5183 covered with the lower part of an overturned storage jar. also identified farther east (Sq L5; L5134), where a small probe (L5181) sunken into this surface showed that here also it was comprised of dark surface buildup directly W516 on the basal dune (Plan 3.15: Section 6-6). Farther east (Sq M4), the Phase IIIB surface was excavated as L5135/5138 and L5110. The downward slope to the north is clearly seen in Sqs M5 and M4 (Plan 3.15: Sections 3-3). An infant burial covered W532 with the lower part of a storage jar, was found immediately below Surface 5110 (L5183; Fig. 3.90). Removal of the Stratum II habitation level in Sq N6 (L5082, see below) exposed an earlier surface of dark ash and organic debris (L5150) founded on the basal dune (Plans 3.15: Section 8-8). An oval structure, consisting of a wall (W532) built of one row of small to medium-sized kurkar stones and preserved up to three courses, lay adjacent to Fig. 3.91. Oval structure in Sq N6 (W532), looking this surface (Fig. 3.91). Originally thought southwest. At upper left, Stratum II W516. to be a tomb, excavation within this feature (L5173) exposed several stones arranged in a bisecting line. No indication of any form of burial was observed, and the function of this feature remains unclear. This structure may be associated with Stratum III, as the Stratum III debris on Surface 5150 appears to be associated with its base, indicating an above-ground and freestanding construction. On the other hand, it could just as likely belong to Stratum II, if it was subterranean and entered from the level of the Stratum II surface.
128
AMIR GOLANI
Building K4 On the eastern side of Area K, a dense concentration of architectural elements represents a complex structure with several building stages (Figs. 3.92, 3.93). The earliest walls and surfaces are associated with Phase IIIB and represent a large building with massive walls founded on a northern-facing slope. In this phase, Building K4 consisted of three massive walls: W528 in the south, W527 in the east and W524 in the west. A partition wall (W531) extended between W524 and W527 (Fig. 3.93). Wall 528, oriented east–west, was traced for 5 m and appears to have continued some 5 m farther west, where it was found at a slightly different angle below Phase IIIA W540. This wall is nearly 1.5 m wide, built of medium-sized to large stones. The adjoining Phase IIIB surfaces on its southern, upslope side were nearly 0.5 m higher than on its northern side. Thus, the southern face of the wall consisted of one course, while the northern face had three additional courses that descended to a lower level, functioning as a kind of retaining wall for the slope (Plan 3.15: Section 11-11). The eastern end of W528 was abutted by W527, which was 1 m wide and built of small to medium-sized stones preserved up to two courses. In its center, W528 was abutted by W524, also 1 m wide and built of medium-sized to large stones preserved up to two courses. No continuation of W524 was uncovered in the adjoining square to the north (Sq O6).
Fig. 3.92. The architectural remains on the eastern side of Area K, looking south.
129
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W525
52
W536
W
W533
W538
3 W 53
52
4
W
4 W531
W527
Fig. 3.93. Building K4, looking south. Note the storage jar in the installation at left (arrow).
Wall 531, only 0.5 m wide and built of small to medium-sized stones, was probably a partition wall between W524 and W527 (Fig. 3.94), to block off a room formed by W528, W527 and W524 (3.5 × 6.0 m) with a beaten-earth floor (L5154). To the north, there appears to have been another room, although its northern closing wall was not located. Within this room was a beaten-earth floor (L5164) upon which was an accumulation of dark-colored debris (Plan 3.15: Section 7-7). The same surface was
W5
23
W5
34
31
W5
W
52
4
Fig. 3.94. The juncture between Phase IIIB W531 and W524, looking south; Phase IIIA W534 separated from Stratum II W523 by a layer of earth.
130
AMIR GOLANI
associated with the base of W527 outside the building to the east, below a Phase IIIA surface (L5149). South of this building, a mudbrick wall (W529), preserved up to one course high, abutted W528. Beaten-earth surfaces were associated with W529 to the east (L5169B) and west (L5169A/5177; Plan 3.16: Section 10-10). Despite the limited exposure of Phase IIIB to the west of Building K4 (Sqs N–O5), the general lack of architectural remains suggests an open area. To the west of W524, a small probe exposed a beaten-earth surface at its base (L5182), and to the north, another beaten-earth surface covered with dark debris (L5147) was exposed on the basal dune, upon which were small stones, some appearing to form a wide arc (Fig. 3.95; Plan 3.15: Sections 4-4, 6-6). A deep probe in Sq N4 (L5106) below a Phase IIIA surface (L5152A) and the base of W540, exposed the western face of a Phase IIIB mudbrick wall (W519) preserved up to two courses (Plan 3.16: Section 5-5). A small portion of the eastern face of this wall was exposed adjacent to the southern balk of Sq N5, although no further continuation of this wall was observed. Phase IIIA In this phase, the two compounds were dismantled and extensive renovations were made to Building K4. Building K4 Although the basic plan of the building was retained, extensive modifications and additions were made in Phase IIIA. The southern W528 continued in use, with a few courses of small stones (W538) added onto its northern face. Wall 527 was shaved down and another stone wall of small to medium-sized stones preserved up to two courses (W533) was laid directly
L5113
L5147
Fig. 3.95. Phase IIIB Surface 5147 in Sq N5, looking north.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
131
on it, creating a slightly narrower wall. Within the southern room of Building K4, a portion of W533 was buttressed with a stone facing (W536) of small stones preserved up to three courses (Fig. 3.96). This refacing could have taken place at a slightly later stage than the construction of W533, but it appears to be consistent with the similar mode of construction seen in W538. To the west, the northern part of W524 was dismantled, and on its southern part a new wall (W534) was built of small to medium-sized stones preserved up to one course high (see Fig. 3.94). The northern wall of the Phase IIIB room (W531) was replaced with a new wall (W526), also built of small to medium-sized stones preserved up to one course high, apparently perpendicular to the northern end of W534. A new room was thus formed within Building K4, of roughly the same size and plan as the Phase IIIB room, except that the shorter W526 provided a clear entrance in the northeast. Within this room was a beaten-earth floor (L5143) that incorporated some small and medium-sized stones laid over the Phase IIIB floor. North of this room, with the elimination of the northern part of W524, an open area appears to have been formed between W526 and W533. The stone courses of W533 ended abruptly, separated by a 0.5 m wide gap from the continuation of the mudbrick superstructure (W512) to the north, suggesting that in Phase IIIA an entranceway existed in the eastern wall of this building. Within this area was a beaten-earth surface (L5155; Plan 3.15: Section W535 7-7). W536 The area to the east of W533 appears to have been partially enclosed in Phase IIIA with the construction of W525, built of W533 medium-sized stones and preserved up to one course high. This wall did not continue the line of W528 and W527 was at a slightly higher level (Plan 3.15: Section 5-5), indicating that it was a later addition to the building. Only the southern face of this wall was traced with certainty; the northern face was poorly preserved and partially dismantled. Wedged between the stones of this wall was a small juglet containing a cache of dentalium shells (Figs. 3.97, 3.98; see Ktalav, forthcoming). The area between W533 and W525 was now resurfaced (L5149; Plan 3.15: Section Fig. 3.96. The Phase IIIA renovation of Building K4’s 7-7), and several stone features were eastern wall, looking south. Note the line of W533 and the stone facing W536. At upper left, Stratum II W535. noted: possible pillar bases, the
132
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.97. A juglet containing dentalium shells wedged between the stones of W525 (arrow).
Fig. 3.98. The dentalium shells in the juglet.
0 54 W
W
51
3
W
52 8
remains of a smelting installation and the lower half of a storage jar sunken into the floor in an upright position and surrounded by a few stones, of unclear function (see Fig. 3.93). During this phase, a new wall (W540), built of small to large stones and preserved up to two courses, was added to the western end of W528 (Fig. 3.99). The western end of W540 was squared off with two large, upright stones; it is unclear if this feature denotes an entrance to this area. North of W540, a new beaten-earth surface (L5113) was laid down in the open area that declined slightly northward with the slope (Sq N5; Plan 3.15: Sections
Fig. 3.99. Phase IIIA W540, looking northeast. The northern face of this wall was partially continued by Stratum II W513.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
133
4-4, 9-9). Within this surface, a smelting installation and several large, flat paving stones were incorporated. South of Building K4, Phase IIIB W529 was removed and the area became an open space and was resurfaced (L5142, L5148/5152B, L5152A). On this surface (Sq O4), a curved wall built of small stones apparently formed an installation of unclear function. Open Area In Phase IIIA, the northern and southern compounds were apparently no longer in use. A few architectural features were discerned in Sqs G3–6 that appear to partially follow the remains of the Phase IIIB northern compound, indicating slightly later modifications; these include W511 and W539 in the southeastern corner of the compound. Wall 511, built of small stones, was founded directly upon the northern end of W501, where the entrance into the Phase IIIB compound was located (see Fig. 3.81). West of this wall was a beaten-earth surface (L5064) with fragments of a large bovid skull adjacent to the wall (Fig. 3.100), all immediately above a Phase IIIB surface (L5119; Plan 3.15: Section 2-2). East of W511 was a similar surface (L5071) that overlay Phase IIIB W530. Upon this surface was a concentration of broken pottery sherds adjacent to W511. An east–west line of mudbrick material perpendicular to W511 may possibly be identified as a wall (W539). These few features are apparently the remnants of a structure that replaced Building K1. Farther north, additional surfaces of this later phase were identified sloping down to the north (Sqs G4–6; L5094, L5095, L5116/5120), suggesting that W518 was no longer in use. In Sq G6, the north–south line of a mudbrick wall (W521), parallel to and at a higher level than W518, may possibly be associated with this later phase. These features are associated with the later building phase of Stratum III on the basis of their relative height in relation to the Stratum III remains in Area B. While an attribution to Stratum II may also be postulated, this appears less likely as no other architectural elements can be definitely associated with Stratum II in the immdiate surroundings.
Fig. 3.100. Phase IIIA W511, looking east. At left, large fragments of a bovine skull (arrow).
134
AMIR GOLANI
Stratum II (Plan 3.17) The remains of Stratum II were situated close to the present-day surface; they were heavily eroded after abandonment of the site, and further damaged by the modern development that preceded the excavation. Stratum II features were found primarily in the central, eastern and southern parts of Area K; no clear remains were identified to the west, near Area B. Building K4 Building K4 of Stratum III continued in use in Stratum II. Several new stone walls were laid directly on the Stratum III walls, while segments of earlier walls were reused and surfaces were relaid. The Stratum II stone walls probably served as foundations for mudbrick superstructures of which no traces were detected. In this phase, the building consisted of W513 and W537 in the south, W535 in the east and W516 in the west. Another two walls (W523, W510) may have been partition walls. Wall 513 appears to be a continuation of Stratum III W528–W540 (Plan 3.15: Section 10-10). Its northern and southern faces consisted of the addition of one–two courses of small to medium-sized stones, with no other stones found between these two stone lines. Farther east, the continuation of W513, labelled W537, was also built above Stratum III W528 and separated from it by a layer of earth (Plan 3.15: Section 11-11). It was much narrower, composed of two rows of small to medium-sized stones arranged closely together. The eastern end of W537 appears to have joined with W535, which was a rather crude and flimsy wall constructed directly over Stratum III W527–W533 (see Fig. 3.96). It appears to have been a partial rebuild of the earlier wall, consisting of a new stone foundation laid over W527. Wall 516 was preserved up to two courses running north–south (Sq N6); W510, a short wall, protruded from its eastern face. A reconstruction of W516 southward links it up with the end of W513, suggesting that they were part of the same architectural complex, perhaps with a wall or a wide entranceway between them. Wall 523, perpendicular to the juncture of W513 and W537, consisted of two rows of small stones built above Stratum III W534 and separated from it by a thick layer of earth (see Figs. 3.93, 3.94). Within the building was a beaten-earth floor (L5099) associated with W513; this floor extended farther north (L5079/5088) and east (L5118/5128, L5178/5136; Sqs N4– 5, O5, Plan 3.15: Sections 7-7, 10-10). Outside the building were several beaten-earth surfaces associated with its walls (L5078/5085, L5082, 5100/5145, L5111/5137, L5126); the surfaces to the south were characterized by scattered small stones and sherds, the surface to the east overlay Phase IIIA surface (L5149, Sq P5; Plan 3.15: Sections 7-7, 8-8). Structure K5 Two large stone foundations that joined at a right angle (W515, W517) and several other architectural features found in central Area K may indicate the existence of a massive structure (Fig. 3.101). These walls, 1 m wide, were built of small to medium-sized stones and
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
135
W515 W517
Fig. 3.101. Remains of Structure K5, looking south. Note the row of large stones (pillar bases?) at upper center.
preserved up to only one course high. A bulldozer had destroyed the western continuation of W517. The southern continuation of W515 was also not found. In the corner formed by these two walls was a beaten-earth surface (L5103) that extended farther to the west (L5097) and south (L5098/5172, L5101). South of W517, several concentrations of large stones were aligned parallel to W515 (Sqs K4–5). The relative positions of these stones in relation to W517 and W515 suggest their function as pillar bases for a large structure whose walls were largely eroded after its abandonment, or robbed at a later date. Adjacent to and east of one of these pillar bases was a horseshoe-shaped installation of small to mediumsized stones. Outside the structure to the east was a beaten-earth surface (L5114; Sq L5), and to the south (Sqs I–J3, L3) were other beaten-earth surfaces (L5015/5033, L5019, L5043) that incorporated two smelting installations. Other Architectural Elements Scattered architectural remains were found between Building K4 and Structure K5. Two parallel rows of stones in Sq M5 appear to delineate the foundations of what may have been a mudbrick wall (W522), although all the mudbricks have long since disintegrated. This wall forms a rounded corner, but no continuation of this structure was found to the north or to the west. Two beaten-earth surfaces were associated with the wall (L5121/5127 to the north and L5108 to the south).
136
AMIR GOLANI
G
H
I
J
K
L
7
6 28.18 27.91
28.03 27.87
28.00 27.78
W517
28.10 27.99
7
28.05 27.99
28.15 28.01
28.24 28.07
L5103
5
L5114
L5097 27.97
6 L5101
28.05 27.99
28.23 28.11
Structure K5
28.28 28.05
28.19 28.09
L5098
28.05
28.07
28.23 28.03
28.31 28.16
4
28.08
W515
28.00
28.23 28.03
L5098 L5172
28.06 28.03
28.10
28.32 28.24 28.41 28.35
Smelting installation
3
Smelting installation
28.48 28.25
L5015 L5033
L5043 28.20
L5019
2
28.44
28.30
2
1 L5063
28.12 28.09
2
L5021
1 28.44
28.42 28.34
L5055
28.17 28.14
L5007 L5016
28.15
L5005 28.40
28.59 28.39
28.67
L5053 28.49 28.39
28.62 28.53
L5077
Smelting installation
28.65 28.55
L5056 L5074
L5054
28.63 28.58
L5008 L5012 28.60
28.68 28.52
1
G
H
I
J
Plan 3.17. Area K, Stratum II.
K
L
137
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
M
N
O
P
4
7
28.07 27.78
28.22 27.91
28.09
28.20
5
L5099
11
28.14 28.09
6
28.47 28.25
L5118 L5128
28.12
L5178 L5136
28.13
W537
28.48 28.30
L5078 L5085
28.40 28.30
W513
L5111 L5137 28.09
5
28.30 28.10
28.29 28.18
28.39
4
L5100 L5145 28.23
28.27
5
28.03 27.98
28.35 28.22
28.26 28.18
28.24
27.95
W535
28.00
W523
2 28.27 W52 L5108 28.10 28.12
27.85 27.72
L5178
L5079 L5088 28.33 28.08
7
27.75
28.00
28.18
4
10
9
3
11
28.24 28.08
Building K4 8 9
28.27 28.08
L5121 L5127
28.08 27.72
W510
3
28.21 28.08
27.91
10
27.94
8
6
L5082 W516
L5126
3
28.65 28.60 28.60
28.57
2
L5086
L5014 28.69 28.63
Stratum II 0
M
N
O
Plan 3.17 (cont.). Area K, Stratum II.
5 m P
1
138
AMIR GOLANI
Farther south, the Stratum II remains consist of several surfaces, pits and burials that were all found within or directly below the topsoil cover and on the Stratum III remains. In Sq G2 was a beaten-earth surface (L5021; Plan 3.15: Section 1-1) that also included a few concentrations of small stones. Farther east, the same surface (Sq J2; L5005) was found at a slightly higher elevation. Within this surface was a pit that cut directly into Stratum III enclosure W506. This surface continued to rise slightly to the east, where it was identified as L5007/5016 and L5008/5012 (Sqs K–L2) and incorporated a smelting installation adjacent to a concentration of crushed ceramic remains. The Stratum II occupation level farther east, designated as L5014 and L5086 (Sqs M–N2), also bore numerous small to medium-sized stones. Infant and Child Burials Numerous burials were excavated in the southern part of Area K. While such burials occurred in Strata IV–II throughout the site, their largest concentration was found in Stratum II Areas B and K, probably in proximity to the core of the Stratum II settlement that appears to have stretched from Area K to Area D (see Chapter 4: Fig. 4.3). Six individual interments were found in Area K: two in pits (L5063, L5077), two in ceramic vessels (L5053, L5074), and two in mudbrick cists (L5054, L5055, L5056––the latter two possibly the same burial). Some of the burials contained an offering. Burial 5063 (Sq H2). This fragmentary burial contained the remains of a child in a flexed position, possibly in articulation yet lacking the skull, within a shallow pit above the Stratum III occupation. Adjacent to the burial was a fish bone that may have been an offering (Fig. 3.102). Burial 5053 (Sq K2). An infant was interred in a medium-sized storage jar resting on its side with the neck and rim missing, probably to facilitate insertion of the skeleton. The jar was laid in the center and above Stratum III Granary 5026 after it had gone out of use (Figs. 3.89, 3.103), implying awareness of the earlier architectural remains.
Fig. 3.102. Burial 5063 with a fish bone at left.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
139
Fig. 3.103. Burial 5053 after opening the jar.
Burial Cist 5054 (Sq K2). A small mudbrick cist (0.47 × 0.90 m), oriented southwest– northeast adjacent to Stratum III Granary 5026, contained the skeleton of an infant lying on its right side in a flexed position (Figs. 3.89, 3.104). The cist was dug from the Stratum II surface and onto the Stratum III surface. The mudbricks (0.10 × 0.35 m) were made of a dark brown material and laid on their sides. Among the bones was a fish bone that may have been an offering. Burial Cist 5055 (Sq K2). A mudbrick cist similar to Burial Cist 5054 contained a few bone fragments. The cist was oriented north–south adjacent to the top of Stratum III W506, using the wall as its northern end (Fig. 3.105). It did not have a closing wall at its southern end, where a large ceramic fragment was found, possibly a burial offering. Adjacent to the south of the cist was a childʼs skull (L5056) that may have belonged to this burial and appears to have been moved from its original position. A bovine jawbone found nearby may have been placed as an offering, but it is also possible that it was related to the Stratum III buildup into which the cist was cut.
Fig. 3.104. Burial Cist 5054 with an infant lying in flexed position.
140
AMIR GOLANI
W506
L5055
L5053
Fig. 3.105. Burial Cist 5055, looking east. Note the large ceramic fragment, possibly the remains of a burial offering, to the right of the cist. At lower right, L5053; at lower center, a bovine jawbone.
Burial 5074 (Sq K–L2). A holemouth jar lying on its side contained the skeleton of an infant in a flexed position (Fig. 3.106). Burial 5077 (Sq K–L2). This burial comprised an infant skeleton interred in a pit, lying on its back, legs flexed and arms crossed over the pelvis (Fig. 3.107); no remains of the skull were found.
Fig. 3.106. Burial 5074.
Fig. 3.107. Burial 5077 interred in a pit.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
141
Area D (Plans 3.18–3.23) Area D is located in the southeastern part of the site and is separated from the areas in the main north–south section (Fig. 3.108; see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3).9 Area D was originally situated at the bottom of the moderate slope descending eastward from the north–south kurkar ridge into the trough. In the eastern part of the excavated area, the archaeological strata were level, while in the western part they sloped upward, apparently following the natural topography of the underlying basal dune. As noted above, modern earthmoving activities had cut a wide swath through the site, removing nearly all the archaeological remains to the west of Area D. The debris from this activity had been dumped in the eastern part of Area D and removed mechanically at the beginning of the excavations. In addition, mechanical excavation of a 15 m wide sewage-pipeline trench that transverses the site from east to west, to the south of Area D, obliterated all archaeological remains in its path, and severed any stratigraphic connection between Areas D and G (Fig. 3.109). However, it was possible to correlate the occupation strata in Area D with those of the other excavation areas in the center of the site. Excavation within Area D identified five
Fig. 3.108. General view of the southern part of the site, looking south. In foreground, Area D; at center, Area G.
Area D was initially probed in a limited trial excavation where remains were visible on the modern surface, to determine their depth and nature. Consequently, a large-scale excavation was undertaken in order to expose as much of the remains as possible. 9
142
AMIR GOLANI
12
11
9
10
8
W174
8 W17
9
W17
7
H
6 W17
G 9 W16
4
Structure D6
W171
F
W166
W164
W168
1
W161
W172
E
W163
9
6
7
3
7
1
W18 W58
W53
8
6
W15
W55
W50
D
8
W1
60
W52 W51
W167
W16
Structure D7
2
7 W5
6
15
W
C
4
6
Building D8
B
12
11
10
9
8
Plan 3.18. Area D, composite plan, Strata V–I and Sections 1-1–8-8.
7
143
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
6
5
4
1
2
3
Structure D9 5 W13
W129
W130
W128
W131
W134
W126
H
W127 W155
G
W175
W177
5
W137
Structure D5
W136
W143
5
W180
Structure D1
W140
W153
59 W1
9
W125
Structure D2
W152
W144
W148
E 7 W14
62
W1
W150
5
14
W
W151
Structure D4
W158
1 W121
W173
W138
W13
W165
F
W154
W15
7
2 W12
4
W149 W156 2
W120
D
Structure D3
3
12
W
W12
3
W14
6
C
Stratum I Stratum II Stratum III, Phase A Stratum III, Phase B Stratum IV 5 m
0
6
5
4
3
2
Plan 3.18 (cont.). Area D, composite plan, Strata V–I and Sections 1-1–8-8.
1
B
25 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
29 00
b
L589
W167
L1220A L1220B
L1204 L1209 b
a
a
W121
E4
E8
L1132
L1089
E12
a L1078
W163 L1001
L1342
L1333 L1341 L1360
L5 L1206 L1210 L1227 L1225W L1309 L1288
L1041
L564
W172
L574
L577
E3
L1036
E7
L1096
L581 L593
W158
L1082
L1016
L1100
L1087
E11
1''-1'''
L1125
L1358 L1368
L1236 L1247 L1282 W 6 L1354 L1356
1'-1''
L1117
W165
1-1'
W168
E6
L1128
W144
E2
L1127
L579
L570
E10
W150
L1094
L587
L1057
une L1299
L1244 L1252
L1217 L1223
L1276 L1322 L1323
W148
E1
L1200 L1208
Basal dune
E5
L1126A
L1013
L1126B
W152
L1118
W173 L1231 L1345 L1363
L1085 L1112 Basal dune
L556
L1057 L1125
L1048
E9 a
L1261 L1268 L1336
b
b
L1122 a
L567 L569
144 AMIR GOLANI
26 00
27 00
28 00
29 00
26 2600 00
27 2700 00
28 2800 00
29 2900 00
5 0 25 25 00
2600 0 26
22 0 27 00
W14 W147
b
L1122B
b
aa
LL1200 200 LL1208 208
E5 E5
L1126A
L567
L1276 L1276 LL 322 32 L1322 LL 323 32 L1323 L 3336 L1336
L1126B
E9
Basal u e Basal dune
LL1223 223 LL1217 2 aa
1 W12 W124
E
E E1
Basal dune
L1048
L1013 L1118
LL1231 23 LL1345 45 LL1363 63
L124 L1244 LL125 252 L1252 6 L126 L1261 LL126 26 L1268
E10
L1125 L1057
L556 W161 L570
L595 L595
LL1117
E6 E6
5 L135 L1356 5 L135 L1358 LL136 6 L1368
L1087
2''-2'''
L1096
L570 L581
-2 2'-2''
Basal u e Basal dune
LL1127 2
W 62 W162 LL1094 094
-2-2'
1 L123 L1236 L124 3 L124 L1333 L133 L1247 L128 L128 L1282 1 L129 L1291 LL135 5 L1354
L1100
E11
LL1079 079 LL1036 036
L593
L5 7 L577
E7 E7
E3
E E3 2 L122 L1225
W172
LL1016 0 6 W167 W167 LL1045 045
2 L120 L1206 L121 L1210 LL122 2 L1227 3 L130 L1309 LL134 L1341 LL136 L1360
Plan 3.18 (cont.). Area D, composite plan, Strata V–I and Sections 1-1–8-8.
L1128
LL1047 04
EE E2
L1132
E12
bb
LL1041 04
LL1001 00 LL1078 0 8 bb
W169 W169
a
L120 L1204 LL120 2 9 L1209 a
2 L1220A L1220A LL1220 220 L1220B
L59 L591 L589 L589
W12 W124
E8 E8
L1089
L564 L564
8 L128 L1288
E4
E E4
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
145
24 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
26 00
27 00
28 00
26 00
27 00
28 00 1040
29 00
27 00
28 00
29 00
c
c
b
b
L1242
35 W156
Basal dune
D2
L1317
D5
L1035
D8
L
L1203
L1222
L1216
L1040
L597
L1232
L1023
aL
a
L1054
D12
L582 156
W156
L1015
L1072
3'''-3''''
W124
L534 L51
L1233 L1240 L1294 L1250
L1221 L1224
Basal dune
W156
L529
W149
D6
D3
ld n L512
D10 3L524 L566
b
L1237 c
c
Basal dune
L557
L598 1043 L1027 W 56 b L1043 W156
L1033 l
Plan 3.18 (cont.). Area D, composite plan, Strata V–I and Sections 1-1–8-8.
W147
D1
3-3'
W50
D4
W149
3'-3''
D7
3''-3'''
D11
L531
L1258 L1270 L1266 L1334 L1295 L1337 L1338
L1298
L1251
L1228 L1273 3L1306
L1219
039 L1037 L599 L1039
L504 53 L530
3 D9
L1034 a L1073 L1074A L1074B
L1033
a
a
146 AMIR GOLANI
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
147
Fig. 3.109. Area D at left, Area G at right, separated by modern pipeline trench, looking east.
strata (Plan 3.18): ephemeral remains of Stratum V, previously defined in Area B, were identified on the basal dune, followed by clear architectural features of Stratum IV within a medium gray-brown matrix. The most substantial remains in Area D are those of Stratum III, which can be divided into two distinct building phases and are further distinguished by their earthen matrices: Phase IIIB lay within a brown matrix, while that of Phase IIIA was light brown in color. Stratum II lay within a dark gray-brown, very compacted earthen layer that included many stone chips and was distinct from that of Stratum III. Finally, a few elements of Stratum I, dated to the Byzantine period, were uncovered.10 Stratum V (Plan 3.19) The earliest stratified remains were exposed in a few limited probes represented by debris layers lacking any architectural remains. Their stratigraphic position on the sterile sands of the basal dune, below architectural elements of Stratum IV, define them as Stratum V. In the eastern part of the area, a 0.2 m thick buildup of dark brown debris with some stones was detected (L1334/1337; Sq D2; Plan 3.18: Section 3-3). In the western part of the area, the Stratum V remains were approximately 2 m higher than in the eastern part. These include a large patch of a packed kurkar layer (L1074B, L1126B) exposed in Sqs D9 and E9, and dark brown laminated debris in Sqs D8, E6 and E8 (L1044, L1045, L1127; Fig. 3.110)
It should be noted that in Area D, as opposed to the other areas, the y axis is alphabetic and the x
10
axis is numerical, and the squares are labelled from right to left.
148
AMIR GOLANI
12
11
9
10
8
7
26.90 26.81
W178
H 26.86 26.79
4
G
F
L1095 26.85
1 L1118 L1122B
E
L1041 L1045 L1041 26.96
27.25
26.79
26.84
L1126A
W167
L1082 26.60
26.77 26.69
27.20
L1126B
7
3
27.08 26.98
27.12
6
2
7
L1074A L1074B 27.15
L549
L550 L543 L547
L538
27.77
C
28.38 27.78
27.55 27.48 28.37 27.75
L1084 27.40 L1088
8
1
W18
27.94 27.70
27.86
28.35 27.67
56
L1044 27.15
L1035 L1040 27.20
L1079
26.70
27.75 27.17
27.17 26.78
L1072 26.62
27.65 27.17
L1146 27.36
28.40
L1060
1
W
26.83
W156
28.20 27.15
27.28
27.86
8
26.91
L1073
L539 L548
D
27.07
L1083 26.99
26.82
4
6
B
12
11
10
9
Plan 3.19. Area D, Strata V–IV.
8
7
149
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
6
5
4
3
2
1
H
5 L1362 L1364
G
25.32
5
26.10 25.76 25.88
W159 25.77
F
25.68
L1371 25.65
25.42 25.07
Structure D2 26.11 25.68
W182
26.02
26.57 26.49 26.60
27.02
L1043 L1046 26.62
W154
E
2
25.14
L1295
3
25.10
25.02
25.37
26.01
25.37
L1334 L1337
25.21
26.15
Pit 25.00
L1368
L1298
L1317 L1306
26.75 26.46
25.00
1 25 63
25.63
W156
L1336
Structure D1
25.63
W151
26.51
25.96
W150
26.02
26.50
L1094
L1231 L1345
W148
26.57 26.50
W15
L1117 L1127
2
26.05
L1250
26.38 26.13
D
25.05
26.27 26.04
C
Stratum IV Stratum V 0
6
5
4
3
Plan 3.19 (cont.). Area D, Strata V–IV.
2
5 m
1
B
150
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.110. A small probe in Sq D8 revealing depositional remains below the base of Stratum IV W156. The basal dune was reached at the bottom of the probe.
and Sqs C–D10 (L549, L550; Plan 3.18: Sections 2-2–4-4, 6-6, 8-8). The limited scope of the Stratum V exposure appears to represent a sporadic occupation of limited duration, or perhaps activities designed to lay down a firm constructional fill upon the loose sands prior to construction of Stratum IV. Stratum IV (Plan 3.19) In Area D, significant building remains began to appear in Stratum IV throughout the area, including two structures, a massive enclosure wall and several walls, some of which may have belonged to a compound. Structure D1 The remains of a mudbrick structure with rounded corners stood at the far eastern edge of the area. Only the eastern wall (W148) was excavated down to its base, comprising a superstructure of brown to orange-brown mudbricks upon a partial stone foundation. Due to time constraints, the southern (W154) and western (W151) walls and a partition wall (W150) were only identified from their very top. A northern extension of the structure is postulated, based on the width and building techniques of these walls. Wall 150 abutted W151, and a small portion also protruded from W148, thus forming a room (2 × 5 m; W148, W154, W151) that belonged to a larger structure of indeterminate shape and size. The entrance to the room was probably located in W150. Lack of time precluded further excavation down to an associated floor. Several beaten-earth surfaces of Stratum IV were found to the south and east of the structure (Sqs D1–2, E1). Upon the surfaces to the south (L1250, L1295, L1298) lay a thick mass of crushed ceramics, partly overlaid by Stratum III W124 (Plan 3.18: Section 3-3), while the surface to the east (L1336; Plan 3.18: Section 1-1) included a pit (unexcavated).
151
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Structure D2 The partial remains of Structure D2, to the northwest of Structure D1, consisted of a curved wall (W159) preserved up to two courses, built of brown to orange-brown mudbricks on a foundation of small kurkar stones. Wall 159 was revealed directly beneath Stratum III W140 and W143 (see below). Within the structure was a beaten-earth floor (L1371; Fig. 3.111). The excavated remains indicate the presence of a structure of unclear plan, possibly associated in some way with Structure D1. Enclosure Wall The most outstanding feature of Stratum IV in Area D was a very large wall (W156) 0.8– 1.0 m wide, preserved up to nine courses and built of brown to orange-brown mudbricks on a stone foundation (Fig. 3.112). It was exposed for 35 m through seven consecutive squares (C10, D4–9). This wall was cut at its southwestern extremity by the large sewage-pipeline trench. South of this wall, several beaten-earth surfaces ran up to its base (L1035/1040, L1043/1046, L1072, L1084/1088; Plan 3.18: Section 3-3; Figs. 3.113, 3.114). The base of a wall fragment (W181), built of small to medium-sized stones and preserved up to three courses, was connected to W156 by Surfaces 1035/1040 and 1084/1088 (Fig. 3.115; Plan 3.19: Section 4-4). This wall was partly reused within the foundations of Stratum III W160 (see below; Fig. 3.116). Farther south, L1146 and L1060 represent limited probes below the Stratum III architecture into the deposits of Stratum IV (Fig. 3.117). Although at least one wall was found roughly parallel to it, no walls were found to abut the southern face of W156. As such, W156 appears to have been an enclosure wall circumscribing a very large area, most of which was obliterated by intrusive modern activities. The southwestern continuation of W156 could theoretically have continued into Area G and adjoined Building G3, located only 15 m to the south of Area D (see below).
13
W
43
8
W1
59
W1
L1371 L1313
Fig. 3.111. Strata IV–III remains in Sq F3, looking north.
152
AMIR GOLANI
W 6 15
Fig. 3.112. The central part of Area D at the end of excavation, looking east; at right, W156.
6
15
W
L1072
L1039 L1039
Fig. 3.113. Wall 156 and the Strata IV–III remains in Sq D7, looking northeast.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W156
L1043
Fig. 3.114. Wall 156 and Stratum IV Surface 1043/1046, looking north.
0
16
W
W156
1
18
W
Fig. 3.115. Stratum IV remains in Sq D8, looking east.
W181
6
5 W1
L1040
Fig. 3.116. Stratum IV W181, as a foundation for Stratum III W160, looking west.
153
154
AMIR GOLANI
L588
L1146
Fig. 3.117. A probe below the Phase IIIB stone pavement (L588) in Building D8 down to Stratum IV Surface 1146.
Other Architectural Elements In the northeastern part of the area, a deep probe reached thick, dark brown debris deposits on a surface in Sq G4 (L1362/1364), directly below Stratum III surfaces (Plan 3.18: Section 5-5). Additional deep probes beneath Stratum III walls exposed the remains of a narrow wall of brown to orange-brown mudbricks (W152) in Sq E5. The bricks of this wall were observed to go into the western balk of the square, perhaps continuing into Sq E6 (W182; see below). Immediately to the east of W152, several stones as well as intact and crushed ceramic vessels lay on a beaten-earth surface (L1231/1345; Fig. 3.118; Plan 3.18: Section 1-1; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming). Wall 182 was narrow and curved, built of small to medium-sized stones and preserved up to one course. Only a small remnant of a stone foundation was identified. This wall and its associated beaten-earth surface (L1094) to the south were partially overlaid by mudbrick collapse (Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1, 2-2). A long portion of a wall (W167), built of brown to orange-brown mudbricks and preserved up to three courses, was exposed for 7.75 m. This wall began in Sq E7 and ran through all of Sq E8, but no continuation was found in Sq E9. South and north of this wall were beaten-earth surfaces (L1079, L1083 and L1041, L1082 respectively). The latter surface may have continued to the north (L1095; Sq F8) where numerous mudbrick fragments upon it suggest a segment of a curved wall, all overlaid by dark brown debris (Plan 3.18: Section 4-4). The fact that both W156 and W167 appear to have coexisted in Stratum IV suggests that W167 may have functioned as an enclosure wall of another compound at this time. Farther north (Sq H9), a remnant of a wall built of light brown mudbricks and small stones (W178) was observed running underneath a Stratum III wall (W179). North of the enclosure W156, several beaten-earth surfaces were also observed in Sqs C10–11, D4–5, D10 (L538, L539/548, L543/547, L1306, L1317; Plan 3.18: Sections
155
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
L1231
W152
Fig. 3.118. Ceramics on Stratum IV Surface 1231/1345, looking south.
3-3, 6-6, 8-8). In Sq D9, two beaten-earth surfaces (L1073, L1074A) were superimposed one atop the other, separated by a layer of sand (Plan 3.18: Sections 3-3). Numerous carbonized olive stones were found on the Phase IVB Surface 1074A (Fig. 3.119). The same stratigraphy of two superimposed beaten-earth surfaces was observed in the adjoining Sq E9 to the north (L1122B of Phase IVA overlying L1126A of Phase IVB; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1, 2-2).
56
W1
L1074A
Fig. 3.119. Carbonized olive stones on Stratum IVB Surface 1074A, looking southeast.
156
AMIR GOLANI
Stratum III (Plans 3.20–3.22) The remains of Stratum III were more extensively exposed than those of Stratum IV. Many new structures were erected in Stratum III, which appears to represent a very intensive building phase (Fig. 3.120). In the northwestern portion of the excavated area, many of the architectural elements were found immediately on the basal dune, indicating that Strata V– IV did not exist in this area, or had been shaved away by the Stratum III builders. The two Stratum III phases were characterized by mudbrick architecture; the Phase IIIB walls were generally wider than those of Phase IIIA. Phase IIIB (Plans 3.20, 3.21) Six separate structures (D3–D8) and various storage installations were founded in Phase IIIB, some of which continued into Phase IIIA. While none of these structures was fully exposed, the remains enable a plausible reconstruction of at least some of them. One storage installation (Plan 3.21), found to the west of the main remains in Sq E18, is probably also to be associated with Phase IIIB, although the excavation was not able to establish a link between this feature and the other architectural elements in Area D.
Structure D3
Structure D4
Fig. 3.120. Stratum III Structures D3, D4 in the eastern part of Area D, looking south.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
157
Structure D3 Only partially exposed at the very eastern edge of the excavated area (Fig. 3.120), Structure D3 represents the remains of a large rectangular or square building of which only parts of the western (W147) and southern (W146) walls were exposed. Wall 147, 9 m long, was built of two rows of dark gray mudbricks preserved up to four courses and oriented southwest–northeast. It formed a right-angled corner with W146, constructed in a similar manner, and may have made another corner at its northern end. Adjoining W147 within the building was W124, built of orange-brown mudbricks and preserved up to six courses. Wall 124 appears to have been a somewhat later addition to the structure and functioned as an inner buttress or a bench along W147. The bases of both walls were found at the same height. Within the structure, a beaten-earth floor (L1294) with some small stones upon it was exposed between W124 and W146. Outside Structure D3, several beaten-earth surfaces were associated with the base of its walls in Sqs D1–2, E1 (L1251, L1266/1270, L1276, L1283, L1322/1323; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1–3-3). Structure D4 Farther west, the Phase IIIB remains were found at a slightly higher level due to the natural topography. Structure D4 was only partly exposed, with three mudbrick walls forming a large, somewhat polygonal building: W149 on the south, W121 on the west and W138 on the east (Fig. 3.120). Wall 149 was built of two or three rows of orange-brown mudbricks preserved up to three courses. At its eastern end, it appears to have been squared off, possibly forming an entranceway with W138 (see below). At its western end, W149 probably connected with W121 at an obtuse angle. Wall 121 was also built of orange-brown mudbricks arranged in two rows and preserved up to four courses. Traced for nearly 9 m, the northern end of W121 ended abruptly. Farther north, a very short wall segment (W136) appears to have connected to a curved mudbrick corner built in similar fashion and material to W121, suggesting the presence of an entranceway into this building, with a line of stones (W153) possibly functioning as a threshold between them. Wall 138, the probable eastern wall of the structure, differed from W149 and W121, being built of brown and brown-gray mudbricks that were extremely difficult to differentiate from the surrounding earthen matrix. Because of this, much of W138 was inadvertently dismantled during excavation, yet the extant traces along with close scrutiny of the balks, enabled the reconstruction of this wall. In its central portion (Sq F3), one line of mudbricks was observed, and the northern and eastern balks revealed this wall to be over 1 m in width and preserved up to four courses. Farther north (Sq G3), the base was exposed, constructed of a row of small kurkar stones. The southern portion of this wall was not excavated, but several lines of stones in Phase IIIA (see below) can be conjectured as continuing the line of W138; they end some 3 m from the eastern end of W149, forming a wide entranceway between these two walls.
158
AMIR GOLANI
12
11
9
10
8
7
27.30 26.89
L1123
L1144
L1114
27.18 26.90
27.30
L1115 27.34
L1114
6 W17
H
26.69
9
W17
L1137 L1143
27.35
26.70
Structure D6
26.87 26.75
W169
26.96 26.81
G
L1124
L1140 L1142 26.78
L1113
27.38
27.21
4
27.53 26.80
L1099 L1102
F
L1090
L1059 L1133
L1101
27.50
27.54 26.89
27.17
27.49 27.11
1
L1100
L1119
27.73 27.52
W168
27.89 27.46
L1132
E
L1055 L1081
27.52
27.54
27.65 27.37
L1085 L1118
L1057 L1128
27.38
27.47
27.44
27.52
27.64 27.57
L1001 L1078
3
7
L1033 L1034
6
27.24 27.87
8
W5
L519 L535
28.38 27.76
0
16
W
6
27.82
L588
27.61
27.90 27.60
L1037 L1039 27.10
27.15 27.07
28.05 27.43
15
W
27.52
27.20 27.09
60
C
W51
8
27.64
L1023
28.14 27.86
W1
28.58 27.74
L1000
28.25 28.17
27.17 26.78
W15
27.65
8
27.05
27.29 26.16
7
Structure D7
D
L1036
27.10
6
W172
2
L1010 L1019
L1029
27.67
27.70
Building D8 4
6
B
12
11
10
9
Plan 3.20. Area D, Stratum III, Phase B.
8
7
159
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
5
6
4
3
25.80 25.56
2
1
L1365
5 W13
25.54
H
25.88 25.72
Structure D5 5
W15
5 L1353 L1355
25.76 25.68
26.17 25.91
25.95
L1350 L1361
26.60 26.29
W136
26.00
26.17 26.03 26.20 25.95
5
26.56 26.41
3
W153
26.81 26.48
14
W
26.79 26.34
26.45
26.25 26.10
26.16 26.01
Structure D3
26.33
25.30
25.56 25.31
L1322 L1323
26.55 26.41
E 25.66
25.30
W1 26.40
26.45 26.37
26.43 26.24 26.43 26.30
W14
9
L1237 26.14
L1266 L1270
L1251 25.30
25.29
26.30 26.13
L1312
25.59 25.26
L1266 25.24
4
L1273
L1027 26.90
26.65 26.38
W12
L1311
2
25.68 25.23
25.58 25.27
26.41
L1310
1
25.70 25.21
L1276
W121
L1220B
F
25.85
26.00
Structure D4 26.70 26.36
L1357
L1313 L1366
W138
W139
L1248
G
W138
25.76 25.68
47
26.04 25.83
W14
6
3 L1294 25.27
25.64 25.28
D
L1283 25.29
25.61 25.38
C
Stratum III, Phase B 5 m
0
6
5
4
3
Plan 3.20 (cont.). Area D, Stratum III, Phase B.
2
1
B
160
AMIR GOLANI
The northern portion of Structure D4 is a jumble of walls of various orientation. Wall 139, built of orange-brown mudbricks and preserved up to four courses, is roughly parallel to W121, and like W121, it was found squared off at its northern end. It was traced for only 2 m southward, where it may have joined W143 at an acute angle, the latter built of orangebrown mudbricks and preserved up to two courses. The function of W139 and W143, both of which appear to be related to Phase IIIB, remains unresolved. Within this structure was a beaten-earth floor (L1237, L1313/1366, L1350/1361) associated with the base of the walls in Sq D3 (Plan 3.20: Section 3-3). Alongside W138, this floor was covered with a concentration of large chunks of burnt ceramics and stones (see Fig. 3.111). Outside Structure D4 were beaten-earth surfaces (L1220B, L1248, L1273) associated with the base of W121 and W149. East of W138, a surface (L1357) was littered with numerous ceramic sherds. Structure D5 Fragmentary remains of a structure to the north of Structure D4, immediately below a Phase IIIA floor (L1281/1352; Fig. 3.121), comprise a segment of a large stone wall over 1.2 m wide (W135), built of two rows of medium-sized kurkar stones with smaller chinking stones in between, preserved up to one course. To the south, a small segment of a wall (W155) built of light cream-brown mudbricks was preserved up to two courses and founded on a row of small stones (Fig. 3.122; Plan 3.18: Section 5-5). On the basis of its orientation and height, this wall probably adjoined W135. South of W155 was a beaten-earth surface overlaid with dark ash (L1353/1355) within which two rounded clay installations of unclear function were embedded. To the east of W155, alongside its base, was another beaten-earth surface (L1365) built over mudbrick remains that are probably associated with Stratum IV (unexcavated).
L1281 Structure D9
W135
1
W13
Structure D5
Fig. 3.121. Structures D5 of Phase IIIB and D9 of Phase IIIA in the eastern part of Area D, looking south.
161
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W155
L1318
Fig. 3.122. Phase IIIB W155 and Phase IIIA Surface 1318 in the northern balk of Sq G4, looking northeast.
Structure D6 In the northwestern part of the area, three walls of an elongated structure oriented north– south were exposed: W169 on the west, W179 on the north and W176 on the east. Walls 169 and 179 were built of light cream-gray mudbricks preserved up to two courses, laid on a foundation of small to medium-sized kurkar stones; they formed a rounded corner (Fig. 3.123). Wall 169 was traced for nearly 7 m. Wall 179, built above W178 of Stratum IV, was traced for nearly 3 m until it disappeared beneath the remains of a Phase
9
16
W
78 W1
W174
W176
9
17
W
78
W1
Fig. 3.123. The northern part of Structure D6, looking south. Phase IIIA W174 is at the same level as Phase IIIB W169. Wall 176 mudbrick line was largely dismantled in the Phase IIIA renovations.
162
AMIR GOLANI
IIIA wall (W174). Parallel to W169, the western face of W176 was uncovered, comprising a long wall of brown mudbricks preserved up to two courses. At its northern end, closely packed, medium-sized kurkar stones appear to be the remnants of the stone foundation of this wall. In the area circumscribed by W169, W179 and W176, a beaten-earth floor (L1137/1143, L1140/1142) was associated with their bases (Figs. 3.123, 3.124), and another (L1144) lay outside the structure to the north. West of this structure, several probes exposed beaten-earth surfaces covered with thick accumulations of dark gray-brown debris (L1113, L1114, L1115, L1124), but no architectural remains apart from one oval pit full of dark brown debris (L1123), indicating an open area. These surfaces lay directly upon the underlying basal sand dune at an elevation over 0.5 m higher than the surfaces inside and outside Structure D6, due to the ancient topographical slope that descended eastward. The peculiar plan of Structure D6, which at present consists of two long, parallel walls forming an elongated room, can perhaps be explained as two retaining walls (W169, W179) erected to protect a large mudbrick structure to the east that was not exposed (see below).
W176
W169
W174
L1140
Fig. 3.124. Structure D6 in Sq G9, looking north. Phase IIIA W174 atop Phase IIIB W176.
Structure D7 On the western side of the area, several fragmentary walls may enable the reconstruction of a rectangular building (outer dimensions 7 × 11 m, inner floor space c. 50 sq m; Fig. 3.125). Two walls with their corners were uncovered—W168 in the east and W172 and W58 in the west. Wall 168 was built of orange-brown mudbricks preserved up to three courses. Its southern continuation was mostly destroyed by a deep Stratum I well that cut through all the earlier remains. The northern end of this wall was identified as a rounded corner; the
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
163
Building D8
Structure D7
Fig. 3.125. Stratum III Structures D7 and Building D8 in the western part of Area D, looking south.
northern wall of the structure was within a balk. The northwestern, rounded corner and remnants of the western wall (W172) were constructed of the same mudbricks as W168 and preserved up to two courses on a stone foundation laid on the basal dune (Sq E12; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1, 2-2). The southwestern corner of the structure may possibly be outlined by W51, a segment of a stone wall preserved up to three courses, and W58, a fragment of a heavily eroded wall of one row of orange-brown mudbricks preserved up to two courses (Plan 3.18: Section 8-8). Within the structure, a beaten-earth floor (L1100) covered with dark ash lay directly upon the basal dune and was associated with the base of W168 (Sq E11; Plan 3.18: Section 1-1). Outside the structure, to the east, a beaten-earth surface (L1057/1128) was exposed at a slightly higher level than Floor 1100. To the south, on a similar surface (L519/535) associated with the base of W51, a complete juglet was found (Fig. 3.126; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming). A surface to the west (L1132) lay on the basal dune, while in the surface to the north (L1059/1133, L1099/1102, L1119), two wide, shallow pits full of dark brown debris (L1090, L1101; Fig. 3.127) cut down into the basal dune. Despite its foundation on the basal dune, Structure D7 is attributed to Stratum III based on its stratigraphic position directly below Stratum II elements, and its two building phases (see below), which are similar to those in most of the Stratum III structures in this area.
164
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.126. Phase IIIB Surface 519/535 with a juglet upon it, and Phase IIIA Surface 506/516 with a stone installation.
W171
L1101
0
L109 Fig. 3.127. Squares G–F/10–11, looking south. Phase IIIA W171 above Phase IIIB Pit 1090, and Phase IIIB Pit 1101 to west.
165
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Building D8/Granary 58811 South of W156, a circular structure was exposed (outer diam. 7.3 m, inner diam. 5.3 m, c. 17 sq m; Figs. 3.128, 3.129). The southern portion of the structure was obliterated by a modern intrusion. The wall of the structure (W160) was founded on a stone foundation composed of one course of medium-sized to large stones arranged in two parallel rows. The foundation partially incorporated the remains of Stratum IV W181 (see above). The superstructure comprised two rows of cream-gray mudbricks preserved to four courses above the stone foundation (Fig. 3.130). A rough stone pavement, possibly the base for a beaten-earth floor (L588, L1010/1019), was found throughout the building (Plan 3.18: Section 4-4). The large size and circular plan of this structure suggest a public function, possibly a large granary.
Building D8
0
16
W
6
15
W
Fig. 3.128. Stratum III Building D8 and W156, looking east.
In Phase IIIB, Building D8 apparently functioned as a granary, while in Phase IIIA it appears to have changed in function. 11
166
AMIR GOLANI
L572
Fig. 3.129. Building D8 in the foreground, cut by a modern intrusion, looking north. Phase IIIB rough stone pavement below Phase IIIA Floor 572.
Fig. 3.130. The southern end of W160, looking north. Note the cream-gray mudbricks on the Phase IIIB stone foundation. At upper left, the Phase IIIA orange-brown mudbrick addition to this wall.
Enclosure Wall Wall 156, erected in Stratum IV, continued in use during Phase IIIB, as evidenced by the beaten-earth surfaces that postdate the Stratum IV occupation to the north (L1001/1078, L1033/1034, L1036, L1085/1118) and south of the wall (L1000, L1023, L1037/1039; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1–4-4; Fig. 3.131). However, at the end of Stratum IV, the eastern part of the wall apparently collapsed, as is evident in Sq D6, where a Phase IIIB surface (L1027) directly overlay the extension of W156 (Plan 3.18: Section 3-3). Farther east, three pits (L1310–L1312) full of gray debris cut into W156, indicating that the wall had gone out of use (Fig. 3.132).
167
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W160
L1000
W156
Fig. 3.131. Phase IIIB Surface 1000, looking south.
Fig. 3.132. Square D5, looking south. Several Phase IIIB pits cut into the eastern end of W156, indicating that this part of it had gone out of use.
Granary 511 (Plan 3.21) The outline of a curved mudbrick wall (W54), located 30 m to the west of the main excavation area (Sq E18), was clearly evident on the surface after mechanical leveling activities had removed nearly all the overlying remains. The structure (outer diam. 3.2 m, inner diam. 2.4 m) was built of one row of brown to cream-gray mudbricks preserved up to three courses (Fig. 3.133). The rectangular mudbricks were carefully arranged, and the curvature of the wall created wedge-like gaps between the bricks that were filled with mudbrick fragments. It is unclear
18
E 27 37
27 59 27 46
L511 L513
54
W 0
2
m
Stratum III, Phase B
Plan 3.21. Area D, Sq E18.
168
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.133. Granary 511, looking north.
whether this structure was circular or elliptical, as excavation to the west did not reveal any continuation of the wall. Within the structure, a beaten-earth floor (L511/513) with light gray debris upon it, directly overlay sterile, light brown, sandy clay loam; no surface was identified outside the wall. As this area was heavily damaged by modern construction and completely detached from any of the other excavated squares, it is unclear to what stratum this feature is to be attributed. As the walls of the structure appear to have been set into the basal dune, it may constitute the remains of a partly above-ground granary, similar to those uncovered in Strata IV and III in Area G (see below). The type of mudbrick is typical of Stratum III. Phase IIIA (Plan 3.22) This phase showed minor renovations in some of the structures and the replacement of others. One of the characteristics of Phase IIIA is the narrow walls made of one row of mudbricks that appear to have delineated relatively small spaces. Structure D3 Structure D3 continued in use with minor alterations. The open area outside the structure to the west was resurfaced at a slightly higher level (Sqs E1–2; L1258, L1261/1268, L1315/1316; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1–3-3), yet no such resurfacing was observed in the very limited area excavated within the structure. Structure D4 This structure also continued in use with modifications. Stones were incorporated into W138 (Sq E3), and in some places small stones reinforced its outer faces (Sq G3). A small, curved wall of one row of mudbricks preserved up to one course high (W145) appears to have been joined to W138.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
The northern portion of the structure remains unclear. A new wall (W140) was constructed above Phase IIIB W143, of one row of mudbricks preserved up to two courses. Wall 140 abutted W138 in the east and connected with W139 in the west in a rounded corner. Within the structure, a new beatenearth floor associated with the walls was laid down (L1288, L1289, L1341/1360, L1348; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1, 2-2; Fig. 3.134). Floor 1289, between W138 and W139, lay above Phase IIIB W143, and a storage jar (L1344) was sunken into the floor in an upright position (see Golani and Talis, forthcoming). Adjacent to the jar was a large concentration of Glycymeris shells lying one within the other, as if they had been strung on a necklace (Fig. 3.135; see Ktalav, forthcoming). Resurfacing was also observed outside the structure: to the north of W136 (L1318; see Fig. 3.122), to the west of W121 (L1220A) and to the east of W138 and W149 (L1242, L1354).
Fig. 3.134. At lower center, Phase IIIA Surface 1288. At upper center, a concentration of ceramics on Stratum II Surface 1225.
Fig. 3.135. An upright storage jar base sunken into Phase IIIA Floor 1289. At upper left, a concentration of shells.
169
170
AMIR GOLANI
12
11
9
10
26.89 26.78
9
L1130
L1108
27.00
27.66
27.61
7
W174
W17
H L1107
8
27.17 26.86
W169
L1091 L1106 27.69
G
L1139 26.98
27.32 27.00 27.53 27.00
Structure D6
4 27.82 27.68
Smelting installation
L1012 L1049
L1086
27.70
27.57 27.48
27.98 27.88
L1032 27.50
W164
27.61
27.76 27.50
W171
F
27.46 27.34
27.98 27.83
L1011
L1075
W166
27.86
1 28.08 27.89
L583 W161
W17
E
L1087 L1096
L1048 L573
2 28.25 28.17
L536
28.38 27.66
8
28.40 27.66
L537 L540
W51 L506 L516
L1016 27.27
27.24 27.18
9 L597 L599
6 15
27.70
W
L584
W1
28.13
28.10
28.11
27.88
28.12
28.09
56
1
W
28.08 28.03
27.86
27.90
Building D8
6
28.35 27.67
L580 L594
L572 L585
L544 L546
28.16 27.98
60
Smelting installation
4
27.99
28.58 27.74
W55
L521 L532
27.85
28.11
28.15
8
8
27.35 27.25
28.00 27.35
28.31 28.11
L551
W5
28.24 27.87
L590
L566
28.32 28.12
28.17
D
27.30
7 L531
27.45 27.25
L591
W16
6
7
3
C
27.52 27.35
27.70
Structure D7
2
27.24
W163
27.75
27.75
27.64 27.28
B
12
11
10
9
Plan 3.22. Area D, Stratum III, Phase A.
8
7
171
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
6
5
25.92
26.21 25.97
W129
L1347
4
Structure D9
L1305 L1369
26.30 26.05
L1304 26.08
26.35 26.25
26.02
W127 26.38
L1340
H
26.23 26.04
26.26 26.03
5
26.17
26.19
L1134 26.76
L1318 26.80
26.60 25.29
26.17 25.91
W136
W180
26.22
L1348
W13
26.84 26.76
25.70 25.21
L1342
L1341 L1360
26.70 26.36
26.14
26.70
L1288
Structure D4
26.40 26.55 26.41
L1220A 26.45
26.52 26.29
W149 26.58 26.38
1
L1261 L1268 25.67
E
25.56 25.31
25.93 25.88
L1315 L1316
L1354 25.80
25.70
2
7
W121
L587 L1020
26.63 26.14
26 41
25.58 25.27
L1258
L1242
26 65 26.51
W14
W173
27.00 26.78
26.20 25.81
F 26.16 26.01
25.70
25.78
26.30 25.13
3 4
27.00
26.24
L1344
26.56
W165 26.64
W140 26.40 26.24 L1289
W138
9
26.59 26.34
W12
26.81 26.48
26.17 26.03
5
5
26.90 26.81
14
26.70
G
26.29
L1138
W177 L1141
W
26.84 26.77
L1281 L1352
W126
W131
26.43 26.15
26.22 26.06 26.24
W128
26.00 26.46 26.09
W130
1
2
3
25.64 25.28
Structure D3 25.59 25.26
D
W14
6 25.61 25.38
C
Stratum III, Phase A 5 m
0
6
5
4
3
Plan 3.22 (cont.). Area D, Stratum III, Phase A.
2
1
B
172
AMIR GOLANI
Structure D6 Two of the Phase IIIB walls (W169, W179), probably retaining walls, continued into Phase IIIA with the addition of several new mudbrick walls, apparently of a large structure to their east. Thus, in this stage, Structure D6 consisted of W174 and W164 in the west, and W163, W165 and W173 in the south. The area west of this structure appears to have continued as an open area with beaten-earth surfaces (L1107, L1108, L1091/1106); which, as in the previous phase, was situated on a higher level than the building to the east. The floor level enclosed by W169 and W179 (L1130, L1139) was raised, and the new floor partly overlaid Phase IIIB W176. Close inspection of the western balk of Sq E8 revealed a mudbrick wall preserved up to three courses (Plan 3.18: Section 2-2), which appears to be the southern extension of W169 as it is similarly aligned and built of the same mudbricks. It could not be determined if it linked with W156, the massive enclosure wall to the south. Wall 174 was constructed of brown to gray-brown mudbricks above W176, but at a slightly different angle (see Fig. 3.124). Farther south, W164 appears to be the southern continuation of W174, although not precisely aligned. Wall 164 was massive, 1.65 m wide, and was traced for 6 m. It was built of brown to gray-brown mudbricks laid on a partial stone foundation and preserved up to three courses (Sqs E–F8; Plan 3.18: Section 4-4). The northern end of W164 was slightly higher than W174, due to the rising slope. Both walls were built of the same type of mudbricks arranged in the same manner, suggesting that they were parts of the same, apparently massive wall. To the south, W164 formed a rightangled corner with W163, traced for 7 m and built of identical material preserved up to two courses. The eastern end of W163 is squared off and ends abruptly. Three meters to the east, W165, of similar orientation yet slightly to the north of W163, was built of orange-brown mudbricks and preserved up to three courses. This suggests an entranceway between W163 and W165, recessed slightly to the north. Similarly, the eastern end of W165 was separated by a 1 m wide gap from W173 to its east (Plans 3.18: Section 1-1; 3.22). Wall 173 is a small, L-shaped segment built of one row of orange-brown mudbricks preserved up to two courses that may have formed an indirect entranceway with W165. Within Structure D6, a beaten-earth floor (L1032) at the base of W164 included a rounded stone installation sunken into it and another, larger installation, both of unclear function. The latter installation comprised a narrow stone wall (W166), parallel to W164 and abutting W163, sunken three courses (0.25 m) below the floor level and forming a rounded corner to the north, although no eastward continuation of this wall was identified. In the area east of these features, only partially excavated, the only elements that could be definitely associated with Phase IIIA were two short mudbrick wall segments in Sq G6 (W177, W180) and their associated beaten-earth surfaces (L1134, L1138, L1141). Resurfacings was also observed outside Structure D6 to the south (Sqs E6–8; L587/1020, L591, L1016; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1, 2-2). Structure D7 Structure D7 appears to have continued in use during Phase IIIA. One course of small to mediumsized stones (W55/W161) was added directly on top of Phase IIIB W168, and the floor within the structure was raised (L531, L551, L1087/1096; Plan 3.18: Sections 2-2, 8-8).
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
173
Outside the structure, new beaten-earth surfaces appear to have been laid at a higher level, including L536 and L1048 to the east (Sqs D–E10; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1–3-3), and L521/532 and L506/516 to the south (Sqs C11–12), the latter surface with a rounded installation of small stones, possibly for holding a jar in place (see Fig. 3.126). In the adjoining Sq C10, another beaten-earth surface (L537/540) was associated directly with W156 (see below). To the north of Structure D7, surfaces were identified as L1086 (with a smelting installation), L1012/1049 and L1011 (Sqs F10–12); the latter two surfaces were also associated with a short segment of a mudbrick wall (W171) preserved up to one course high (see Fig. 3.127). Building D8 Building D8 also continued to function during the later phase of Stratum III, when it underwent several alterations. Within the structure, a new beaten-earth floor was laid down (L572/585, L580/594; see Fig. 3.129). The western portion of the building contained a smelting installation, indicating that in this phase the building was apparently not used for storage. Alterations in this phase also comprised the buttressing of the exterior of W160 on its western and northwestern sides with orange-brown mudbricks preserved up to two courses (see Fig. 3.130). A beaten-earth surface (L584) lay to the northwest, between Building D8 and the enclosure wall (W156). Structure D9 After Phase IIIB Structure D5 had gone out of use, Structure D9 was erected in its place. It appears to have been composed of three small rooms and a granary, all constructed of narrow walls of one row of brown-gray mudbricks, mostly preserved up to one or two courses (Figs. 3.121, 3.136). The northern and western walls were not excavated.
L1253
W126
W127
Fig. 3.136. The top of Phase IIIA W126 and W127 of Structure D9, looking south. At upper left, a Stratum II installation (arrow).
174
AMIR GOLANI
The eastern room (Sq H4) was bounded by W126, W127 and W128. Within the room, the beaten-earth floor (L1281/1352) founded on top of Phase IIIB W135 was covered with large amounts of crushed ceramic vessels (Fig. 3.137). The entrance into this room may have been from the west, where another, possibly larger room may have been bounded by W128, W127 and W129. The beaten-earth floor in this room (L1304, L1305) was also covered with numerous crushed ceramic vessels. To the west, another room may have been partly enclosed by W129 and W130, with a beaten-earth floor (L1347). The fragmentary remains of Structure D9 appear to delineate small rooms that opened onto an open space with a granary (L1340). Granary 1340 To the southwest and adjacent to Structure D9, the northern part of a circular granary (outer diam. 2.4 m, inner diam. 2.0 m) was partly exposed (see Fig. 3.121). The granary was constructed of a mudbrick wall (W131) in similar fashion to the other walls of Structure D9. The floor was composed of carefully arranged mudbricks (L1340). Enclosure Wall Evidence for the continuation of this wall is seen in beaten-earth surfaces to its north (Sqs D9–10, C10; L566, L536, L537/540) and south (Sqs C9–10; L584, L544/546); however, to the east, a surface attributed to Phase IIIA (L597/599) appears to overlie this wall (Sq D8; Plan 3.18: Sections 3-3, 4-4). The repeated collapse of this wall during Phase IIIB resulted in an even smaller portion being used in Phase IIIA.
W126
W127
W128 Fig. 3.137. The eastern room of Structure D9 with a concentration of ceramic vessels on Floor 1281/1352, looking southeast.
175
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Stratum II (Plan 3.23) In contrast to the smooth transition between Strata IV and III, a drastic change appears to have taken place in the transition to Stratum II. Nearly all the Stratum III architectural features went out of use, and much of Stratum II consisted of an open area with disjointed constructions of small stones, and concentrations of stones dispersed throughout. There is very little indication of mudbrick construction, such as mudbrick debris, a phenomenon observed in other excavated areas as well. The lack of overlying sand in the western part of the area, together with the modern earthmoving activities, led to the disappearance of much of Stratum II in Area D. Only in the eastern and southern parts of the area were some remains preserved. Eastern Area D On the eastern edge of the area (Sqs D–E/1–2, F2), several beaten-earth surfaces were interspersed with concentrations of stones (L1232, L1233, L1252, L1256, L1282, L1308). A wall segment (W144) over 1 m wide, built of two rows of medium-sized stones chinked with smaller stones and preserved up to one course high, was exposed in Sq E2, but no further remains of a structure were identified in adjoining squares. West of these remains (Sqs D3–4, E3–5), additional stone-built features of unclear plan were preserved up to only one course high, along with beaten-earth surfaces and concentrations of ceramics (L1208, L1209, L1210/1227, L1213, L1225; see Fig. 3.134). South of these surfaces were several stone concentrations, possibly fragments of walls and pavements (W120, W122, W123) associated with beaten-earth surfaces (L1219/1228, L1221, L1224). In Sq E6, where the remains of Stratum II are slightly higher due to the topography, a large portion of a stone structure composed of small stones within a dark brown earthen matrix (W162), delineated a rounded space, probably an installation (inner diam. 1.5 m; Fig. 3.138). Within this round space, a large amount of dark gray burnt debris including
W1
62
65
W1
Fig. 3.138. Stratum II Installation 162, looking northwest.
176
AMIR GOLANI
12
11
9
10
8
7
H
4
G
L1026
F
27.80
27.88 27.74
L1053 L1080 27.83
27.88 27.74
1 L581 L593
E
28 10
7
3
D
Smelting installation
28.48 28.24
C
L518
28.26
27.97 27.91
L512 L524
28.50 28.32
L529 L534
L557 28.20
28.35
28.35
28.24 28.17
27.50 27.20 27.70
L582
28.12
L1015 L1028 27.35
28.22 28.15
L526
7
W5
L517 28.22
L504 L530
28.26
8
W52 28.39 28.24
L510
28.84 27.62
7
L545 W53
8
27.60
28.00 27.90
28.29 28.02
28.24 28.09 28.48 28.32
28.49 28.31 28.41 28.33
28.19
28 27 28.11
W50
L1054
28.00
6
2
28.04
28.21 27.95
L564 L589
L567 L569
L556
28.06
28.21 28.07
28.54 27.08
28.02
27.92
4
6
B
12
11
10
9
Plan 3.23. Area D, Strata II–I.
8
7
177
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
5
6
26.60 26.30
4
3
1
26.45 26.36
L1292 L1297
H
W134
L1253 L1259
26.46
26.37
26.39
26.56
26.51 26.21
26.39
27.08 27.00
5
L1264 26.63
27.02
26.57 26.36
W175
Smelting installation
L1254
L1327 26.28
L1328
L1325 L1331
26.35 26.24
26.52
W137
L1135 L1136 27.05 26.96
2
26.38
26.85
G
L1326 26.23
26.60 26.47
5
27.04 26.82
Smelting installation L1214 26.81 L1234 26.63
26.55 26.25 26.72
26.43
26.82
39
W125
W1
W121
26.57
26.51
26.53
L579 L586
L1208
27.10
27.28 26.86
62 W1 L595 L1047 26.93
F
26.19
26.49
L1243 27.13 27.00
L1308
L1245 26.58 L1265
27.07 26.98
26.17
1
L1209 26.69
26.77
L1225
L1210 L1227
26.66
L1252
E
25.90
L1282
26.72
L1021
26.28 26.12
26.29 26.14
26.50
L1213
27.28 26.85
W144
25.92
26.06
26.79
26.99
2 W
12
26.76 26.63
2
26.56 26.43
26.73
26.46 26.32
W120
L1232 26.19
3
L1233 26.07
26.15 26.02
L1224
3
12
26.52
26.65 26.51
26.38
W
L1219 L1228
L1221
26.31
D
L1256
26.23
26.00
26.57 26.49
C
Stratum I Stratum II 5 m
0
6
5
4
3
Plan 3.23 (cont.). Area D, Strata II–I.
2
1
B
178
AMIR GOLANI
pottery sherds overlay a beaten-earth floor (L595/1047), while outside, to the north and east, were associated surfaces (L579/586, L1021). To the northeast, a beaten-earth surface was interspersed with concentrations of small stones in Sq F3 (L1245/1265). In Sq F4, a well-built rectangular pavement of an installation (W125) sloped down southward. This feature was constructed flush with the uppermost courses of Stratum III W121 and W139, and appears to be related to them (Fig. 3.139); apparently the Stratum III architecture was still visible to the Stratum II builders. This feature was found at a higher level than the Stratum III surfaces exposed in the adjoining squares to the south and east, and is at the same height as the Stratum II beatenearth surface (L1214/1234) adjacent to it in the north. Farther northeast, in Sq G3, a narrow wall (W137), built of two rows of small stones and preserved up to three courses, was positioned directly upon Stratum III W138, which was probably adapted as a base. East of W137 was a beaten-earth surface (L1326), and another to its west (L1325/1331) contained two adjacent, shallow rounded pits (L1327, L1328). Pit 1327
W121
W125
W139
Fig. 3.139. Stratum II pavement of an installation (W125) between the tops of W121 and W139, looking northwest.
Fig. 3.140. A concentration of small ceramic vessels in Stratum II Pit 1327.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
179
contained a concentration of small ceramic vessels, primarily small votive drop pots, in addition to a small flask (Fig. 3.140; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming). In Pit 1328, another ceramic deposit included fragments of several bowls and juglets, as well as a high loop-handled jug and two small flint blades (Fig. 3.141; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming; Goder-Goldberger, forthcoming). Within both pits, the ceramic depositions appear to have been intentional. Unfortunately, the fragmentary nature of the Stratum II remains in this area preclude a better understanding of the reason these vessels were interred in this manner. In Sq G4, the remains of two clay-lined conical installations, probably employed for copper smelting, had been sunken down from the beaten-earth surfaces (L1254, L1264; Plan 3.18: Section 5-5). In Sq G6, a curved wall (W175) may represent the remains of a small structure with a rounded corner, within which a partial stone pavement was revealed alongside a beatenearth surface (L1135/1136, Fig. 3.142). To the north, the Stratum II remains consisted of a beaten-earth surface in Sq H4 (L1253/1259) and at the eastern edge of the square was an installation of small stones (see Fig. 3.136). In Sq H5 were a beaten-earth surface (L1292/1297) and a narrow curved wall (W134) built of two rows of small to mediumsized stones chinked with smaller stones and preserved up to three courses.
Fig. 3.141. Concentrations of vessels in Stratum II Pit 1327, upper center, and Pit 1328, lower right.
W1
75
L1135
Fig. 3.142. Stratum II remains in Sq G6, looking south.
180
AMIR GOLANI
Western Area D West of W162, the remains of Stratum II consisted of a large open area with localized concentrations of small stones on beaten-earth surfaces (Sqs D–E/7–9, F7–8; L557, L564/589, L567/569, L582, L1015/1028, L1026, L1053/1080; Plan 3.18: Sections 1-1–4-4). In the southwestern part of the area, meager architectural remains of unclear plan include north–south W50, built of two rows of medium-sized stones chinked with larger stones, preserved up to one course high and exposed to a length of 6 m. Its southern end was largely removed by the construction of a Byzantine well (see below, Stratum I), while its northern end was eroded or cut away. Another wall (W57), built of mudbricks preserved up to one course high, abutted W50 near its southern end (Figs. 3.143, 3.144; Plan 3.18: Section 8-8). A row of small stones (W53) possibly running parallel to W50, may indicate the remains of a third wall delineated by several lines of small stones of similar orientation nearby. Between W50 and W57 was a beaten-earth surface (L504/530, L545) with a small circular installation of small stones and pottery sherds upon its floor, possibly to hold a ceramic vessel upright (Fig. 3.145). East of W50 were beaten-earth surfaces (Sqs D–E10; L512/524, L529/534, L556) laid directly over the Stratum III remains (Plan 3.18: Sections 2-2, 3-3, 6-6–8-8). Numerous medium-sized to large stones were embedded in Surface 556. To the northwest of W50 was a surface (L581/593) with several stone installations of unclear function and the remains of a smelting installation (Plan 3.18: Section 2-2). West of W53 and W57, two shallow pits (L517, L518) were cut into a beaten-earth surface (L510), and farther north in Sq D12, the same surface was identified as L1054.
W57 L504 0
W5
W55
Fig. 3.143. Stratum I well cutting through the Stratum II remains in the southwestern part of Area D, looking south.
181
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W50 W57 L504
3
W5
Fig. 3.144. Stratum II remains, looking east.
Fig. 3.145. Circular installation on Stratum II Surface 504/530.
Stratum I (Plan 3.23) Limited remains of the Stratum I occupation, attributed to the Byzantine period, were identified within the topsoil that overlay most of the excavation area. These remains do not appear to have been in situ, consisting of scattered ceramics and building stones that had been disturbed by the modern-day earthmoving activities. In the southwestern part of the area, the ruins of a deep well were exposed (see Fig. 3.143), which may be the one alluded to in the British Mandate map of Ascalon North,12 found some 600 m south of a well named Bir Shuqeir that is located on the coast. The British Mandate map depicts a walled compound on a low hill with palm trees and a vineyard,13 which may indicate the presence of a well, possibly the one uncovered here.
British Mandate map, Sheet 10/12, 1:20,000 series, first printed in 1931.
12
Triangulation point 186G at a height of 35.9 m asl; map ref. 15983/62294.
13
182
AMIR GOLANI
A wall (W52) ringed the circular shaft (outer diam. 2.4 m, inner diam. 1.75 m) constructed of dressed kurkar ashlars on the inside and small to medium-sized stones and plaster on the outside. Twelve courses of ashlars were exposed, and the upper portion of the wall appears to have been shaved away. Excavation of the shaft reached a depth of 1.75 m, revealing it to be full of debris such as architectural fragments, plaster and marble slabs (L526). Ceramics within the debris included numerous Gaza storage jars, providing a date in the sixth century CE for the cessation of its use.
Area G (Plans 3.24–3.27) At the time of excavation, the contours of Area G, located to the south of Area D, were largely formed by modern earthmoving operations that had sculpted this area into an elongated, artificial ridge approximately 30 m wide, which rose gradually toward the west, where it was suddenly cut. To the north, a large modern pipeline trench completely severed any connection with Area D, while earthmoving activities to the south had removed most of the archaeological levels, thus cutting any ties with Area E (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3).
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
Building G3
1
6
W84
W103
5
5 W
83
W93
W96
W81
Building G1
3 4
W105
2
W104
W92
Building G2
W87 W8
W106
W95
4
92
W84
5 W8
6
3 4
W9
W
1
02
3
W88
2
W
W1
1
2
89
W98
W90
Intrus on
4
5
6 D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
Plan 3.24. Area G, composite plan, Strata IV, III, I and Sections 1-1–6-6.
L
M
183
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
The archaeological remains and the original topography were observed to slope down eastward into the trough. The western part of Area G appears to have been on a slightly higher level than its immediate surroundings. The basal habitation heights of Areas D and E on either side are 3 m and 2 m respectively below those of Area G, indicating that Area G was situated in a spot that overlooked the rest of the site, probably on one of the east–west ridges that traversed the trough. Over 800 sq m of archaeological remains were exposed in Area G (Fig. 3.146), and the positioning of the excavated squares was largely dictated by the extent of the modern intrusions. As the eastern extension of the area was covered by a heavy overburden of sand, not all of which could be removed within the allotted time, a long trench composed of four continuous, 2 × 4 m squares (R–U/2) was excavated here. This trench was devoid of architectural remains and revealed that the archaeological level thinned out toward the east, indicating the location of the site’s southeastern boundary. The habitation accumulation in Area G was not very substantial, and the finds originated primarily in Strata IV and III, apart from the intrusion of a few Stratum I pits (Plan 3.24). Although no Stratum II remains were identified, it is possible that they had been shaved away by the modern earthmoving activities prior to excavation. The top of the
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
1
W99
Structure G4 W9
7
2 2
1
W9
3
W
10
0
W
10
1
4
Stratum I
W101
5
Stratum III, Phase A
W100
Stratum III, Phase B Stratum IV
0 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
6
5 m T
Plan 3.24 (cont.). Area G, composite plan, Strata IV, III, I and Sections 1-1–6-6.
U
29 00
30 00
31 00
28 00
29 00
30 00
29 00
30 00
31 00
28 00
29 00 W
30 00
b
b
L822
H2
E2
L824
W92
H2
L951A L951B L976
M2
L929 L852
W85
L940
W84 L853
W102
a
a
L821
L1427
W102
M1
I2
L993
L875
I2 L882
L953
L864
F2
L964
L87 L955
L1430
L829
L957
L1417
L1
L950
N2
L914B
L871B L914A
2-2'
L836
W98
L871A
J2
J2
L1410
L992
2''-2'''
L979
2'-2''
W90
1-1
L9 L944
95 L1404
L996
K1
L954
G2
O2
K2
W97
L956
K2
W90
L983
L942
L809A L809B
L1410
L880
W88 a
a
L918
L989
L983
W98
L878A L9 2 L878B
J1
L932
L2
P2
L2
W99
W L921
L886B
L971
L932
b L886A
I1
W102 b
b
184 AMIR GOLANI
28 00
29 00
30 00
28 00
29 00
30 00
28 00
29 00 8
30 00 9
28 00 28 00
29 00 8 00 29 00
30 00 9 00 30 00
W88
a
L1414
L870
L809A
a L912 L941
a
a
L830
H3
L815
93 W93
L862
L815
L885
L930
L825
L1436
G2
E3
L809B
L888B L888B
L888 L888A
K2 K2 W
F2
4'-4''
L928B
L928A
4-4'
3'-3''
33 3-3'
L871A
W82
L871B
L852 L852
L935
J3
L953
L882 L882
L875 L875
G3
E2
L809A
W81
W85
L936 L936
2# H3
L1409
K3
L862
L826
L917
W84
a
a
L 8 04 84 L9 W104 W84 L963 L958 L958
H2 H2
L830
L822 L822
L832#
L929 L853
L 405 L1405
L920A L920B
L845
L816
L960
L864 960
L957 L957
I2 I2
Plan 3.24 (cont.). Area G, composite plan, Strata IV, III, I and Sections 1-1–6-6.
L946
L883
L818
L876
L836
L9 4 L914A
L916
L868
I3
F3
L873
W92 W105
W82
L870
L872
L9 4B L914B
J2 J2
a
88 W88 a
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
185
186
AMIR GOLANI 30 00
F3
W83 29 00
L833 L840
W103 Basal dune
W83 W103B
Basal dune
L841 L869
L965
28 00
5-5 D2
30 00 L850 W89
W89
29 00
L865
L874 28 50
6-6
Plan 3.24 (cont.). Area G, composite plan, Strata IV, III, I and Sections 1-1–6-6.
Fig. 3.146. General view of Area G at the end of excavation, looking south.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
187
sterile sand dune was usually reached at 0.2–1.0 m below the modern surface, and only a few of the excavated squares yielded archaeological accumulations exceeding 0.5 m. The remains in this area were characterized by curvilinear architecture, typical of Strata IV and III in other excavated areas and generally absent from Stratum II (see Chapter 4). While the buildings in Area G were built of mudbrick on stone foundations, as in Stratum II, this curvilinear style in Area G makes an association with Stratum II unlikely. In addition, throughout most of the excavated areas Stratum II showed a sharp break with Stratum III, whereas the stratified architectural remains in Area G demonstrated a great deal of continuity; thus, an identification of Stratum II in Area G is implausible. The continuity between Strata IV and III in Area G is also evident in the storage facilities. In Stratum IV of Area G, two types of mudbrick storage installations were found, a silo and three granaries. In one locale, a granary was superimposed atop a silo. The silo was typical of the Stratum IV architecture throughout the excavation, while the granary was characteristic of Stratum III. An identical phenomenon of a Stratum III granary replacing a Stratum IV silo was observed in Area A. Stratum IV (Plan 3.25) Stratum IV represents the earliest habitation, founded directly upon the basal dune over most of the area. Three buildings (G1–G3) and one structure (G4) are assigned to Stratum IV, along with several installations and pits. Buildings G1 and G2 and Structure G4 were elliptical in plan, and may be considered typical EB I domestic structures. Building G3 was apparently larger and of a different plan, and apparently served some other function. Building G1 Although this building was badly damaged and only portions of its walls were preserved, the plan can be reasonably reconstructed as elliptical, oriented on a northeast–southwest axis (Fig. 3.147). The width of the building is 5.6 m, while the length, though uncertain, may be reconstructed as c. 9 m, producing approximately 28 sq m of floor space. Only W85 and W82 survived, built of two rows of small to medium-sized kurkar stones with smaller chinking stones in between and preserved up to two courses. The northern end of W85 curved eastward and probably continued to form the northern apse of Building G1, which was damaged by mechanical equipment. The southern part of this building was also missing due to modern intrusions. On its eastern side, a 0.7 m gap in W82 indicates the entrance into the building. Inside the building, across from the entrance, a short stone and mudbrick wall (W106), preserved up to one course high, protruded from W85. A beaten-earth floor (L825, L959, L960) was laid on the basal dune (Plan 3.24: Section 3-3). A small smelting installation appears to have existed within the southern apse (L825), while a similar, slightly larger installation was located just outside the posited southern apse.
188
AMIR GOLANI
D
E
F
G
H
I
L1439 28.53 28.29
W106
6
3
3
4 Smelting installation
29.47 29.39
L959
L960 29.44
L1434
29.39
29.69 29.44
29.29
29.29 29.14
L815 L870
L963
29.21 28.98
29.45
29.53
3 10
92
L1409 28.93
29.36
5
29.07 27.99 27.95
5
29.24 28.95
29.25
L869 L965
W
29.49
L993
W
29.16
L1435 29.14
L825
Smelting installation
L1441
L873 L876
29.43
1
29.27 28.93
29.47 28.93
W105
29.69
29.39 29.31
29.76 29.29 29.48 28.65
W92
29.74 29.02
29.78 29.47
29.78 29.50
29.77 29.50
28.93 28.37
L1433
L1438
W82
28.95
2
W85
6 89 W
2
L865 L874
29.75 28.99
L1440
L1437
Building G1
W84
1
W84
28.97 28.82
L946
L1414
28.93 29.39 28.92
W96
Building G2
29.07 28.03
L924 L970 29.16
4
28.84
29.27 28.93
29.17 29.00
5
6
D
E
F
G
Plan 3.25. Area G, Stratum IV.
H
I
189
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
Building G3
28.48
29.34 29.42
28.93
L935 28.77
29.34
L1442
29.02 28.80
28.62
1
L1430 28.55
L1429
1
29.00 29.17
L964 28.55 27.38
L951B L976
W94
29.33
L920B
28.40
Structure G4 W9
7
28.62 28.36
L979 L992
28.58
L1428
L897
4
L902
L904
28.60
28.24
L974
27.97
91
27.92 28.06 27.50
W
27.95 27.48
L991
27.75
27.91
27.80
28.00
28.07 27.98
L1418 L1419
L1407
L1408 28.00
27.86
27.73
27.84
W101
27.70
1
L1412 10
L900 L1411
27.84
W
27.80
3 L1431
27.47
27.83
L903
28.08 27.63
2
27.95
27.73
27.84
27.79
L906
27.80 27.70
27.85 27.79
28.57
28.56
3
2
01
28.73
W1
28.57
29.27 29.57
L914B
28.71 28.62
L1410
W99
28.75 29.46 28.82
28.94 28.70
L938
W98
L918
W90
28.58 28.69 28.66
4
27.82
L1425 27.63
L1413 L1420
5
27.70
27.91 27.73
Stratum IV
0 J
K
L
M
N
Plan 3.25 (cont.). Area G, Stratum IV.
O
P
5 m Q
6
190
AMIR GOLANI
L865
Building G1
L869
Fig. 3.147. Building G1 and the two storage installations positioned to its east and west, looking east.
Installations in the Vicinity of Building G1 Two large storage facilities were found in proximity to Building G1, and several pits and a ṭabun were scattered to its east, in the open area between this building and Building G2; near one of the pits was a child burial. Granary 865. Immediately to the west of Building G1, a circular granary (outer diam. 3 m, inner diam. 2.3 m) was partially sunken into the ground. It was first dug as a pit 0.8 m deep into the basal dune, after which a mudbrick wall (W89), preserved to eight courses, was constructed within. The floor was composed of irregularly laid mudbrick fragments and covered with dark brown debris (L865/L874; Figs. 3.147, 3.148; Plan 3.24: Section 6-6). Silo 869. Southeast of Building G1, a silo was constructed within a large pit dug into the basal dune. It comprised a circular mudbrick wall (W103; outer diam. 2.7 m, inner diam. 1.8 m) of which eleven courses were preserved that descended 1.3 m to a floor of mudbrick fragments (L869/965) overlaid by dark gray debris (Figs. 3.147, 3.149; Plan 3.24: Section 5-5). Open Area To the east of Building G1 was an open space (Sqs F–H2) with a beaten-earth surface (L815/870, L873/876, L963) laid upon the basal dune and overlaid by dark gray debris
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
191
W89
Fig. 3.148. Stratum IV Granary 865.
W83
W103
L840
Fig. 3.149. Stratum IV Silo 869 (W103) underlying Stratum III Granary 833 (W83). The brown mudbricks of the silo were separated by a dark gray fill from the lighter-colored mudbricks of the granary.
(Plan 3.24: Section 3-3). A ṭabun14 (L1441; diam. 0.9 m), dug from the surface into the basal dune, was lined with red-brown clay, 8 cm thick. In its immediate vicinity were five rounded pits with diameters ranging from 0.40 to 1.25 m (L1433, L1434, L1435, L1439, L1440), all dug into the basal dune to a depth of 0.30–0.75 m (Fig. 3.150). All the pits were full of dark gray-brown debris. Another rounded pit (L1438; diam. 1.1 m) was dug 0.6 m into the basal dune, adjacent to the proposed line of the northern apse of Building G1. Next to this pit and directly underneath the posited wall line, was a large fragment of a holemouth jar (L1437; Fig. 3.151) containing a child burial in a flexed position (Fig. 3.152). The location of the burial indicates that it predated the building, whether as an earlier depositional phase or more probably as a foundation burial associated with the construction of the building.
While this feature and many others like it are often generally referred to here as ṭabuns––a type of closed oven built of earth or clay––they could have also functioned as more simple open roasting pits, as the upper portions of most ṭabuns found in this period are missing. 14
192
W88
AMIR GOLANI
W81
L1441
Fig. 3.150. Square G2, looking south. Stratum IV pits and Ṭabun 1441 to the east of Building G1. At left, Stratum III Fence W81–W88.
Fig. 3.151. Pit 1438 next to Burial 1437.
Fig. 3.152. Burial 1437 after the removal of the upper part of the vessel.
193
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Building G2 Building G2, located 10 m to the east of Building G1, was constructed on a similar northeast–southwest axis and was better preserved than the latter. It was elliptical in plan with outer measurements of 5.5 × 10.0 m, producing approximately 35 sq m of floor space (Figs. 3.153, 3.154). The walls of this structure (W84, W92, W96) were all built of small to medium-sized kurkar stones arranged in two rows with smaller chinking stones in between, in some places preserved up to seven courses. It is assumed that the upper courses of the wall consisted of mudbrick, though no direct evidence was found. The building’s walls were damaged primarily by intrusive pits of Phase IIIA and Stratum I (see below) that removed numerous stones from the walls. The entrance into this building was not found; however, analogous to Building G1, it may have been located in the middle of the eastern wall, where large portions were missing. Within the building was a beaten-earth floor (L1409, L1414; Plan 3.24: Sections 3-3, 4-4), found adjacent to the base of the stone walls and constructed directly on the basal dune. Adjoining W92 on the east was another wall (W105) built of several rows of small kurkar stones and preserved up to two courses (Sq I3). This wall, which may be interpreted as a low bench outside the building near its possible entrance, was erected on the beatenearth surface (L946) associated with the base of W92 (Plan 3.24: Section 4-4). Another beaten-earth surface (L924/970) south of Building G2 was associated with the base of W96.
W88
L994
W81
W92
Fig. 3.153. Building G2, looking south. At right, Stratum III Fence W81–W88 separating Buildings G2 and G1. Note Phase IIIA Pit 994 cutting into W92 of Building G2.
194
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.154. Building G2, looking north. At center, Phase IIIA architectural remains that postdated this building, pedestaled on earth.
Building G3 Building G3 was located a few meters northeast of Building G2 (Fig. 3.155). Only the southern part of the building was uncovered, as the large modern trench had obliterated its continuation to the north. The extant walls (W90, W94, W98) were built of medium-sized kurkar stones arranged in two rows with smaller chinking stones in between and preserved up to seven courses. These walls are wider and more massive than those of Buildings G1 and G2, and appear to delineate a rectilinear broadroom with rounded corners. The eastern wall (W98), upon which two mudbrick courses had survived on its stone foundations (Plan 3.24: Section 1-1), ended to the north in a large kurkar stone set across the width of the wall, possibly indicating the doorjamb of an entrance. Assuming that this structure was indeed a broadroom with an entrance in the middle of its long eastern side, approximately half of the building has been preserved, and a plausible reconstruction would produce a relatively large structure (7 × 14 m, inner floor space c. 72 sq m), oriented northeast–southwest with its entrance toward the east. Adjoining the inner faces of the walls were rows of stones preserved up to five courses, approximately 0.60 m in height, which are interpreted as narrow benches, 0.25–0.30 m wide (Fig. 3.156). Within the building, a beaten-earth floor (L938, L1410) with numerous mudbrick fragments upon it was associated with the base of the benches (Plan 3.24: Section 1-1). A round installation (L1442; diam. 1.60 m), composed of brown mudbrick material, stood 0.10–0.15 m above the floor, 0.70 m from W90 (see Figs. 3.155, 3.156). A beaten-earth surface (L918) extended to the west of Building G3, and on a similar surface to the east (L1430; Plan 3.24: Section 1-1) lay several smashed ceramic vessels
195
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Building G2
Building G3
Fig. 3.155. Buildings G3 and G2, looking south.
W98
4
W9
L1442
W90
Fig. 3.156. The southern portion of Building G3, looking east. Note the rounded corner and stone benches along the inner sides of the walls. At upper left, the proposed eastern entrance into the building (arrow).
196
AMIR GOLANI
together with a round installation (L1429). This feature, about 0.6 m from W98, was constructed of a roughly laid circle of small to medium-sized kurkar stones (diam. 1.6 m, height c. 10 cm; Fig. 3.157). Its position outside and adjacent to the presumed entrance to the building suggests that it may have functioned together with Installation 1442.
L1430
L1429
W 97
Structure G4 To the east of Building G3, the remains of Structure G4 consisted of an east–west wall (W97) that might Fig. 3.157. Stratum IV Installation 1429 and crushed ceramic have joined the rounded corner of vessels on Surface 1430, east of Building G3, looking southeast. a north–south wall (W99). Though both walls were badly damaged and fragmentary, they appear to have been built of two rows of small to medium-sized kurkar stones with smaller chinking stones in between and were preserved up to two courses (Fig. 3.158). No surface clearly associated with Stratum IV was found within this structure, but a beaten-earth surface to the south (L979/992; Plan 3.24: Section 2-2) linked the base of W97 with another Stratum IV surface farther west (see below).
W99
Fig. 3.158. Remains of Building G4, looking west. At center, a concentration of stones that may represent a Stratum III installation.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
197
Enclosure Wall and Installations Between Building G2, Building G3 and Structure G4 was a large open area nearly devoid of architectural remains that sloped down southward (Sqs J2–3, L1, K3–4, M–O/2–5, P3–5, Q2). This area was heavily affected by modern leveling operations and the few surviving archaeological features were founded directly on the basal dune and thus probably to be associated with Stratum IV. This open area was bounded on the southeast by a long, curved wall (W101) built of mudbricks set upon the basal dune and preserved up to two courses. This wall runs west– east, then turns toward the northeast. It was traced for 25 m and appears to have been an enclosure wall delineating a large courtyard. Several beaten-earth surfaces were identified on either side of this wall (L897, L900/1411, L902–L904, L914B, L918, L920B, L935, L951B/976, L974, L979/992, L1407, L1408, L1412, L1413/1420, L1418/1419, L1425, L1428, L1431; Plan 3.24: Sections 1-1–4-4). Two rounded pits (L964, L906) were sunken into the surface. Pit 964, between Building G3 and Structure G4, was deep and of indeterminate form (Plan 3.24: Section 2-2), while Pit 906 was located farther south. A fragment of a ‘violinʼ-type stone figurine was discovered on the surface (L920B) south of Building G3 (see Rosenberg, forthcoming). Granary 991. Within this open area was a large granary (outer diam. 4.3 m, inner diam. 2.7 m) that appears to have been partially constructed in a pit dug into the basal dune (Fig. 3.159). A circular mudbrick wall (W91) was built inside the pit to a depth of 0.59 m. The wall was preserved up to six courses, four of them above ground. However, it was not possible to determine the size of the individual bricks. At the bottom of the granary was a floor made of mudbrick fragments (L991).
Fig. 3.159. General view of the large open area to the south of Structure G4, looking west. At center, Granary 991; at left, enclosure W101/W100.
198
AMIR GOLANI
Stratum III (Plans 3.26, 3.27) Stratum III exhibits a great deal of continuity with Stratum IV, often differentiated by no more than a raising of floors within a building, or architectural modifications to the plan. As in other areas, Stratum III can be divided into two phases. Phase IIIB (Plan 3.26) Building G1 This building continued in use with minor modifications that consisted primarily of a new beaten-earth floor (L864/953) laid 0.10–0.15 m above the earlier floor of Stratum IV (Plan 3.24: Sections 2-2, 3-3).
D
E
F
G
H
I
Smelting installation L921
29.12
29.06
Building G2
L816 L845
W
29.49
L833 L840
5
29.31
29.47 29.14
4
29.40
5
L917
29.17
29.65 29.45
29.39 29.05
L835
29.47 29.34
L814 L827
29.48 29.00
29.04
29.25
W104
L1436 29.42 29.38
83
29.55 29.21
L912 L941
29.24 28.95
L883 L916
29.05
W96
29.01
29.35 29.05
29.29
29.43 29.33
5
6
D
E
F
G
Plan 3.26. Area G, Stratum III, Phase B.
H
L882 L957
W105
W88 29.81 29.41
29.38 28.93
L936 L1405
W92
29.72
4
3
29.27 29.57 29.04
W84
29.61
29.29 28.73
L958
29.13
Smelting installations
W81
W106
29.56
29.40
2
3
L836 L872
29.54
L809B
1
29.27 29.05
2
29.69
L864 L953
29.04
W9
2
29.76 29.60
Building G1
W8
W8
5
6
29.78 29.60
2
6
29.61 29.40
29.22 29.06
4
29.77 29.60
W8
1
I
29.17 29.00
199
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Fence Wall and Installations To the east of Building G1, the open area that separated it from Building G2 was now divided by a narrow stone and mudbrick wall (W81–W88) built of light cream-brown mudbricks with numerous calcite concretions and preserved up to four courses (see Fig. 3.150). This wall, running north–south and traced for 15.65 m, was cut at its extremities by modern disturbances. It apparently served as a fence wall separating the two buildings (Fig. 3.160), or perhaps as an enclosure wall of a compound that included one of the buildings, although not enough of the wall was exposed to determine this. Between this wall and Building G1, the Stratum IV habitation level––including the pits and the ṭabun––was covered over, and a new beaten-earth surface was laid (Sqs F2, G2–3; L809B, L816/845, L836/872; Plan 3.24: Sections 2-2–4-4) and a new pit (L1436) cut from the Stratum III surface.
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Building G3
28.77 28.94 28.70
L1404 28.73
29.32 29.05
29.42 29.29
L871B L914A 29.00
29.30
W95 29.34 W94
29.32
29.30
L888B 29.07
29.19
29.11 28.98
28.99 28.71
L1427 28.70
1
L983 L989 L950
L951A 29.24
28.55
28.87
L962
3
1
Structure G4
2
29.27 28 73
29.46 28.88
28.71
29.00
W10
29.02 28.80
L1417
28.55 28.00
28.62 28.36
28.40 28.26
W99
29.19 28.73
W98
29.05
W90
L878B
W9
L971
7
28.24
L954 28.36
28.57
28.41 28.26
2
2
L973 28.17
4 L928B 29.03
28.06 27.50
3
1
W9
27.47
L991
4
W
10
0
27.83
28.07 27.98
W100
5
28.01 27.91
27.90
Stratum III, Phase B 6
0 J
K
L
M
N
Plan 3.26 (cont.). Area G, Stratum III, Phase B.
O
5 m P
200
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.160. General view of the western portion of Area G, looking west. At lower center, Fence W81–W88 that separated Building G1 from Building G2. At upper center, Building G1 flanked by two storage installations.
West of Building G1, Stratum IV Granary 865 does not appear to have had a second phase of use, although there is nothing that actually negates its continuation into Stratum III. However, Stratum IV Silo 869 to the southeast of the building was replaced by a granary. Granary 833. This installation, 2.7 m in diameter, was built over Silo 869 and above ground (see Fig. 3.149). The former W103 had been partially destroyed or eroded away prior to construction of the Stratum III wall, as an uneven, dark gray fill separated these two elements. Wall 83 was built of the same light cream-brown mudbricks as W81–W88, which are readily differentiated from the darker mudbricks of the Stratum IV structure. Within the Stratum III granary, the floor, comprised of a layer of mudbrick fragments, sealed the fill in the Stratum IV silo, and a thick layer of light gray debris lay upon it (L833/L840; Plan 3.24: Section 5-5). Building G2 Building G2 also continued in use into Stratum III with minor alterations that consisted primarily of a new beaten-earth floor (L912/941, L936/1405) laid 0.10–0.15 m above the Stratum IV floor. In addition, an inner mudbrick partition wall (W104), preserved up to four courses, was added perpendicular to W84 (Plan 3.24: Sections 3-3, 4-4). East of the building, adjacent to the Stratum IV bench (W105), a new beaten-earth surface (L916) was laid, indicating that this bench continued in use in this phase.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
201
Building G3 This building continued in use into Stratum III with more modifications than were apparent elsewhere in Area G. A new beaten-earth floor (L1404; Plan 3.24: Section 1-1) was laid, covering Stratum IV Installation 1442. To the east, the building was enlarged with the construction of a new annex. This renovation consisted of two walls (W95, W102) constructed of two rows of small to medium-sized kurkar stones with smaller chinking stones in between (Fig. 3.161), which met in a rounded corner. The western end of W95 abutted W98. The northern continuation of W102, like the rest of Building G3, was obliterated by the modern intrusion. Within the area bounded by W98, W95 and W102 was a beaten-earth floor (L1417; Plan 3.34: Section 1-1) that covered over Installation 1429 in the same manner that Floor 1404 in the main building covered Installation 1442. Structure G4 This structure appears to have continued from Stratum IV, although it could have been founded in Stratum III. Within this structure was a beaten-earth floor (L983/989; Plan 3.24: Section 2-2) upon which was a concentration of small to medium-sized stones that may represent an installation of unclear function (see Fig. 3.158). Enclosure Wall and Installations The large open area between Building G2, Building G3 and Structure G4 appears to have continued to exist. A narrower course of small stones (W100) was laid on top of Stratum IV W101. Although this may have been an architectural feature of the Stratum IV wall, the fact that W100 is narrower and of a completely different construction technique suggests that it was a later addition, possibly of Stratum III. As W100 was exposed very close to the modern-day surface, no clear habitation surfaces could be associated with it. Granary 991 may have also continued in use during Stratum III, although no clear surfaces connected
L939
W95
L932
Fig. 3.161. Phase IIIA–B Building G3 annex.
202
AMIR GOLANI
this feature to nearby Stratum III remains. To the west of Building G2, Fence W81–W88 formed an alley approximately 1.5 m wide. A beaten-earth surface (L958, L917) connected the base of the fence wall and W84 of Building G2 (Plan 3.24: Sections 2-2–4-4). It cannot be determined if the fence wall connected with W100 to the south. New habitation surfaces were found in the open area (Sqs H1, I–J/1–3, K2, M1–2, N–P2; L835, L871B/914A, L878B, L882/957, L883/916, L888B, L921, L928B, L950, L951A, L954, L971, L973, L1427; Plan 3.24: Sections 1-1, 3-3). Three smelting installations were sunken in Surface 921 (Sq I1) to the northeast of Building G2. A round pit (L962), 0.45 m deep and lined with a 5 cm thick layer of reddish-brown clay, may be attributed to this stratum as it was cut into the surrounding matrix from this level (L950). A mass of crushed pottery lay on the surface (L951) west of Pit 962. Phase IIIA (Plan 3.27) The remains of Phase IIIA appear to have been much more limited than those of Phase IIIB; however, as they were positioned very close to the present-day surface, it is possible that some elements of this phase were removed by modern earthmoving activities. Buildings G1 and G3 continued in use with minor modifications, while Building G2 and Structure G4 were apparently abandoned. Building G1 A new beaten-earth floor (L824, L829) incorporating a pavement of small stones was laid in the area of the northern apse, 0.15 m above the Phase IIIB floor (Fig. 3.162; Plan 3.24: Section 2-2). Fence Wall To the east of Building G1, the open space bounded by Fence W81–W88 continued to exist. A small screen wall (W87), constructed of gray mudbricks perpendicular to W81–W88, was preserved up to one course. Adjacent to these walls, in Sq G2, was a beaten-earth surface (L809A; Plan 3.24: Sections 2-2, 3-3). Building G3 This building continued in use with minor modifications consisting primarily of the raising of floor levels. Within the main room, a beaten-earth floor (L942/956, L944/996) superseded the Phase IIIB surface, and in the annex to the east, a beaten-earth floor (L932, L955) lay slightly above that of Phase IIIB (Plan 3.24: Sections 1-1, 2-2). A new wall (W93) was perpendicular to and abutted W94 on the south. This addition was built of two rows of small to medium-sized kurkar stones and preserved up to three courses. Its southern extension was shaved away by modern earthmoving activities, so it is unknown what size room was appended to the southern part of Building G3 in this phase. Two beaten-earth surfaces were associated with W93 on the west and east (L885, L888A; Plan 3.24: Section 3-3).
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
203
Fig. 3.162. Remains of Building G1 in Phase IIIA, looking west.
Open Area with Installations Building G2 was completely abandoned and the entire space between the fence (W81–W88) and Building G3 became a large open area (Sqs H2–3, I–J/1–3) with the Phase IIIA beatenearth surfaces overlying the walls of Building G2 (L822/853, L826, L830/862, L852/875, L868, L871A, L878A, L886A, L930; Plan 3.24: Sections 1-1–4-4). A deep circular pit over 1 m deep (L994) cut down from the Phase IIIA level into W92 of Building G2 (see Fig. 3.153), while nearby, a concentration of stones and the remains of two smelting installations were discovered (see Fig. 3.154). Southeast of the annex, a smelting installation was embedded in a beaten-earth surface (L939/943; see Fig. 3.161), and farther east, the same beaten-earth surface was identified as L940. The remains east of Building G3 were badly damaged by modern intrusions, so it is unclear if Structure G4 also continued in this phase. Stratum I (Plan 3.27) A thin cover of loose sand that contained a small quantity of finds from the Byzantine period lay over the Early Bronze Age strata. No architectural elements of this period were identified here, and the Byzantine remains were limited to several pits that penetrated deep into the earlier strata. Although the pits were randomly positioned, one was sunken directly into the center of Phase IIIA Pit 994. These pits are attributed to Stratum I due to the presence of Byzantine artifacts within them, and in the sand cover above the Early Bronze Age strata.
204
AMIR GOLANI
D
E
F
G
H
I
L886A
1
29.33
29.77 29.66
5
6
3
29.62
29.66
Building G1 29.69
W106
2
29.61
L809A
L829
L824
W8
2
29.61 29.70
29.83
29.83
29.69 29.65
1 L826 29.41
W87
29.72 29.76 29.47
3
29.39
Smelting installations
L830 L862
L994
29.68 29.33
29.38
29.40
L930 29.38
5
29.40 28.47
L868
29.38
W81
5
L852 L875
L822 L853
29.49
29.81 29.41
29.62 29.59
29.53
4
29.64
W88
2
W8
6
29.78 29.66
L861 L812
4
29.43 29.33
5
6
D
E
F
G
H
Plan 3.27. Area G, Stratum III, Phase A and Stratum I.
I
205
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Building G3
L878A
L944 L996 29.10
29.10
L942 L956
29.42 29.29
L885
29.20
W93
L928A
28.99 28.81
29.31
L871A 29.34
L955
W95
29.07 29.34
W94
29.29
29.00
L888A
29.19 29.30 29.16
29.48 29.16
L932
L939 L943
1
29.11 28.98
29.05
29.30 29.05 29.19
1
2
29.44 29.10
W10
29.32 29.20
W98
W90
29.20
29.24
2
L966
2
L940
28.96
29.05
3
4
29.03 28.98
Smelting installation
3
29.90
4
5
Stratum I Stratum III, Phase A 6
0 J
K
L
M
N
Plan 3.27 (cont.). Area G, Stratum III, Phase A and Stratum I.
O
5 m P
206
AMIR GOLANI
Area L (Plans 3.28–3.31) Area L, positioned in the northeastern part of the site, was planned as a major east–west section that would link up with Area H in the central north–south section to the west and the edge of the Early Bronze settlement to the east (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3).15 Prior to excavation, this area was level, with no indications of archaeological remains on the modern surface; however, the remains were found to be covered by a massive modern fill of sand, relatively shallow on the western side of the area, but 2 m thick at the eastern end. Mechanical removal of the sand was accomplished without penetrating the dark brown matrix of the Early Bronze Age strata below. Underneath the modern sand, the very top of the Early Bronze Age occupation was observed to slope down moderately to the east. An area at least 20 m wide and 100 m long was prepared for excavation (Fig. 3.163). During the initial stages of excavation, a large agglomerate of architectural remains was identified in the central portion of the area, while the eastern and western parts were nearly devoid of architecture, containing debris buildup that gradually dissipated toward the eastern edge of the site. For this reason, excavation in the central portion of Area L was expanded to expose and understand the remains as much as possible, while to the west and east, work was conducted in a series of half squares positioned at set intervals along and within a 10 m wide section (Fig. 3.164). Thus, the remains in Area L can be divided into three parts, each with specific characteristics: 1. In the central part of Area L (Sqs I–O/2–5), the architectural remains of Strata IV–III were well preserved and included structures within a light to medium gray-brown matrix, while Stratum II was characterized by a few disjointed walls and surfaces within a dark brown earthen matrix with numerous kurkar chips.
1
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
2 W613
3
Building L2
W634
9 W631 W61 W62
W408
4
6
W
2
W6 16
4
Area H
W619
1
17
5 Building L1 6 A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Plan 3.28. Area L, composite plan, Strata IV–II and Sections 1-1, 2-2.
See n. 4 above.
15
I
J
207
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Fig. 3.163. General view of Area L, looking west. In background, the main north–south section. Note the large amounts of sand that were cleared away in order to reach the top of the archaeological remains.
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W603
K
0
W
61
W635
23
W6
2
L
M
N
4
Stratum II Stratum III, Phase A
5
Stratum III, Phase B Stratum IV
0 K
1
W602
611
Building L3 W61 8 W638
3
W
W60
9
W606
W607
W632
W622
5B
W624
05A
W60
W601 W604
W61
W6
6
62
W
6
W
2
W613
5
08
7 62
W628 W637
2
W
W61
0
W62
1
O
P
Q
R
S
T
Plan 3.28 (cont.). Area L, composite plan, Strata IV–II and Sections 1-1, 2-2.
U
10 m
6 V
25 00
26 00
27 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
2 25 00
2 26 00
2 27 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
26 2600 00
27 2700 00
28 2800 00
d
d
c
c
W609
L6025
L4
L 3 L6183
L6223 L6223
L6217 L62 7
L6094
L6084
b b
b b
a
a
L6218 L62 8
L6200 L6200
Q4
L 1 9 L6179
I4
L6082
M4
L 1 0 LL6166 L6150 L 1 L6174
61 W619
E4
A4 A4
61 W616
R4
4 J4
L6032
N4 L6030
Basal dune
1'''-1''''
1''''-1'''''
L6155
L6119
W615
C4 C4
K4 K4
G4
L6194
L 0 6 L6046
L 49 59 L6149 L6 6 L6159 L6 59
W604
L 2 L6123 W 1 W614
S4
L6103
L6064
L6099
L6059
1''-1'''
L L6169
1'-1''
1-1' 1-
L 123 L6123
F4
63 W631 L L6148
L 1 8 L6158
B4 B4
63 W637
O4
6 W610
L 0 L6018
L6145
L6 L6107 1 L6 L6124 L6131 L
LL4
T4
P4
d
d
c
c
b
b
L6193
L L6094
aa
aa
L6204
L 02 L6025
L 0 L6084
L 1 2 L 3 L6112 L6039
1 0 L6170
L 0 L6045
L6135
Basal dune
H4
D4 D4
U4
208 AMIR GOLANI
25 00
26 00
27 00
25 00
26 00 26 00
27 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
24 00
25 00
26 00
27 00
c
c
b
b
a
7a
L3 L3
P3
Basal dune
T3
L6050
L6066
L6208
L6176
L6165
H3
L6180
6 5 L6151
L6138
L6017
W612
W610
G3
W637 L L6101
K3 K3
L6029
9O3
L6104
L6126
2'-2''
W615
W604
L6044 L6100
2'''-2''''
2 2 2''-2'''
Basal dune W614
L6092
L6013
2-2'
L6163
Basal dune
Basal dune
J3 J3
F3
W608 Basal du e B sa
L6221 615
L6048
N3
Basal dune
R3
L6108
L6167
L6055
L6042
Q Q3
W619
L6073 L6102
L6068
L6173
L6139
E3
L6153
Basal du B se
L6118
L6147
L6057
L6079 0L6132
Plan 3.28 (cont.). Area L, composite plan, Strata IV–II and Sections 1-1, 2-2.
W620
L6009
S3
L6156L 6 03 L L6203
I3 I3
L6225
L6 8 L6118 L6139 6 3 L6153 W617 6 73 L6173
L6051 L6089
M3
a
a
c
c
b
b
Basal dune
D3
L6142
L6133
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
209
210
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.164. General view of Area L, looking south.
2. In the western part, six half-squares (C–H/3–4) were positioned along a west–east section (Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2). Small probes revealed no architectural remains, but a buildup of debris layers, no more than 1 m, often much less, from the top of the archaeological remains down to the sterile basal dune. The layers of debris and the lack of any architectural remains strongly suggests that a broad open area existed here at that time. 3. In the eastern part, one square (P3) and six half-squares (Q–V/3–4) positioned along the west–east section revealed debris layers, some containing limited architectural remains, which sloped down moderately toward the east (Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2). The archaeological buildup here did not exceed 0.5 m, and decreased to the east. In Sq V4, at the very eastern edge of the section, almost no buildup was discerned, the modern sand overburden lying on a diminishing layer of debris that marked the very edge of the settlement, probably associated with Strata III–II. Stratum IV (Plan 3.29) Central Area L Stratum IV represents the earliest habitation in this area, founded directly on the basal dune. The remains consist of a large compound with an elliptical building on its western side and a broad courtyard to its east containing two mudbrick storage installations. The compound was not excavated in its entirety; from the extant remains it can be reasonably reconstructed as somewhat kidney-shaped in plan, with measurements of approximately 17 × 29 m and an inner area of at least 400 sq m. The compound was circumscribed by a 0.6–0.8 m wide wall built of light brown to orange-brown mudbricks
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
211
preserved up to four courses, intermittently laid on a stone foundation of small to mediumsized kurkar stones. A total of 29 m of this wall was exposed (from west to east: W617, W613, W620, W615, W611). Wall 617 was traced for 3 m in a southwest to northeast orientation (Fig. 3.165). Farther east, W613, oriented east–west (Figs. 3.166, 3.167; Plan 3.29) abutted W620 to its east. At the juncture of these two walls, W620 continued approximately 2 m to the southwest, where it appears to have served as an inner partition wall of the compound. The wall was overlaid by Stratum III W628 (Fig. 3.168; Plan 3.28). Wall 615, oriented north–southeast, was preserved to four courses on a foundation of small kurkar stones. It was severely damaged by Stratum III W604 and later pitting activities, which removed significant segments of the wall down to its base (see below). Wall 611, oriented northeast– southwest, probably continued westward, eventually linking up with W617 (Fig. 3.169). Within the compound, several beaten-earth surfaces were associated with the base of the enclosure wall (L6099/6103, L6104, L6109, L6121, L6173, L6178; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2). A probe in Sq N4 beneath the Stratum III surface exposed a few stones and a large fragment of a bovine skull on the Stratum IV surface (L6099/6103; Fig. 3.170). Outside the compound, beaten-earth surfaces (L6087/6090, L6128, L6152, L6182/6186, L6207, L6221; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2) were also associated with the base of the wall.
W6
36
W6 1
4
Building L1 On the western side of the compound, the remains of an elliptical building were revealed; only the northern part of the building was excavated, the remainder lay outside the excavation area. This structure may be reasonably reconstructed with outer measurements of 5.5 × 9.0 m and approximately 35 sq m of floor space. It was partially damaged during the construction of Stratum III Building L2, which was built directly upon it (see below).
W616
W619
W617
Fig. 3.165. Strata IV–III remains in Sqs I–J/3–4, looking east.
6
H
1
2
7
L6130
I
25 78 25.48
L6174
25.49
61
W
25.51
25.46
L6152
25.50
25.54
L6169
J
25.56
L6113 25.84 25.61
25 75 25.56
25.56
L6220
25.88 25.53
L6167 L6163
W614
Building L1
W634
L6137
L6134
25.48
25.82 25.50
25.45
L6173
26.04 25.81
26.06 25.73
25.75
L6104
W613
25 78
L6128
K
5
63
W
26.11 25.83
K
25 42
L6188
L
L6112
25.77
26.00 25.83 25.72
M
M
L6031 L6033
25.54 25.47
26.14 25.76
L6182 L6186 L6186
Plan 3.29. Area L, Stratum IV.
25.75
25.97 25.73
L6178
26.02 25.78
25.85
L6207
L
26.11 25.48
W620
25.78
25.72
26.01 25.76
25.78
L6109
25.67
L6099 L6103
L6079 L6132
W 60 8
25.80 25.70
25.52
L6121
5
61
W
N
26.66
25.90 25.50
N
25.95 25.87
25.76
L6087 L6090
25 91 25.64
W611
5
4
3
16
25.78 25.47
W6
0
2
9
W62
1
4
J
W61
I
W
H
W62
W615 61 1
1
25 76 25.55
25.55
L6221
O
0
O
P
Stratum IV
2
P
5 m
6
5
4
3
2
1
212 AMIR GOLANI
213
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W610
W613 L6067
Fig. 3.166. Stratum IV W613, looking north. At right, Stratum II rough stone Pavement 6067.
W612 L6067 W637
W620
W613
W613
W610
Fig. 3.167. Strata IV–II remains in Sq K3, looking south. Stratum IV W620 and W613 under W610 of Stratum III. Stratum II W612 and Pavement 6067 at top.
214
AMIR GOLANI
W612
W620
W610
W613
W628
W620
Fig. 3.168. Strata IV–III remains in Sqs L2–3 and K3, looking south. Note Stratum III W628 atop Stratum IV W620.
W607
W611
Fig. 3.169. The southeastern corner of Stratum IV Compound W611, looking north. At left, Stratum III W607.
Building L1 was oriented on a northeast–southwest axis and had two entrances. The western wall (W616) was constructed of mudbricks on a stone foundation of small to mediumsized kurkar stones arranged in two rows with smaller chinking stones in between. A 0.75 m wide gap within the wall appears to indicate a western entranceway into this structure (Fig. 3.171). The wall of the northern apse (W614) was well preserved, retaining at least two
215
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
L6064
W604
L6099
W611
Fig. 3.170. A probe in Sq N4, exposing remains of Strata IV and III. At left, the remains of a large bovine skull (arrow) on Stratum IV Surface 6099/6103.
Fig. 3.171. Building L1, entrance in W616, looking east.
mudbrick courses on two courses of small to medium-sized stones (Fig. 3.172). Only a stone foundation of the eastern wall (W629), preserved up to three courses, was exposed. A gap of 0.75 m in this wall appears to indicate an eastern entrance into the building as well. A few stones topped by mudbrick material extending roughly parallel to the southern edge of the balk of Sq I4 at floor level suggests the existence of an inner partition wall (W634) that perhaps separated the southern apse from the rest of the structure.
Fig. 3.172. The northern apse of Building L1 (W614).
216
AMIR GOLANI
Within the building, a beaten-earth floor was partially exposed (Sqs J3–4; L6134, L6163, L6169; Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2). Outside the building, beaten-earth surfaces were associated with the bases of the walls (L6113, L6130, L6174, L6220). Courtyard with Storage Installations The large open courtyard, mostly to the east of Building L1, was partly divided by an inner wall, the southern continuation of W620. Over most of the area to the east of the building, excavation reached the Stratum IV level, identifying two circular structures of Stratum IV: Granary 6079 in the northeast and a circular structure in the south that was not excavated, although the circular outline of its mudbrick wall (W635; outer diam. 2 m, inner diam. 1 m) was apparent when the Stratum III surface was removed (Fig. 3.173). It is unclear if this was a granary or a silo. Granary 6079. This structure, adjacent to W615 (outer diam. 3.2 m, inner diam. 2.2 m), was built of a mudbrick wall (W608) within a pit. Eight courses of the wall were preserved below the ground, therefore much of the structure must have been above ground. The granary was connected to W615 by a beaten-earth surface (L6121, L6221; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2). A section excavated within the granary revealed it to be full of debris on a beaten-earth floor (L6132) that was sealed by the Stratum II surface (L6048; Fig. 3.174). This feature may have continued in use into Stratum III as well (see below), a phenomenon also observed in Area G (W89). The Western and Eastern Fringes In the western part of Area L, the debris directly overlying the basal dune was of a soft, loose consistency, generally brown or light brown in color. This layer may possibly be attributed to Stratum IV (Sqs F3, G4; L6108, L6135, L6145; Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2). In the eastern part, no Stratum IV debris was identified.
Fig. 3.173. The top of Silo(?) 635 after removal of the Stratum III Floor 6044/6100, looking north.
217
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
4
60
W
L6048
W608
W615
Fig. 3.174. Stratum II Surface 6048 overlying Strata IV–III Granary 6079, looking south. At lower center, Stratum IV Compound W615; at upper left, Stratum III W604.
Stratum III (Plan 3.30) Central Area L Stratum III represents a completely new building phase in this area, and only a few cases of continuity with Stratum IV were observed. One clear habitation level was associated with Phase IIIB, and only in Building L3 and its immediate vicinity were two clear stratigraphic phases (IIIB, IIIA) identified. Phase IIIB Building L2 On the western side of the central part of Area L, remains of a mudbrick building were revealed upon the remains of Stratum IV Building L1. Building L2 was built on the same northeast–southwest axis as its predecessor, although slightly offset, indicative of some continuity between these two strata. As with Building L1, only the northern portion of this building was uncovered. The mudbricks were not of the typical light cream-gray material characteristic of most Stratum III mudbrick construction at the site, but rather of dark to medium-brown material, almost the same color as their surrounding matrix; in addition, as the walls lacked any stone foundations, their identification in the field was extremely difficult. Building L2 was rectangular in plan with rounded corners. Two walls were identified with certainty, the western wall (W619) and the eastern wall (W631), both preserved up to two courses. The curving corner at the northern extremity of W619 suggests that W636, the northern closing wall, continued in the balk (see Fig. 3.165) and adjoined W631 in
H
25.75
L6166
W636
25.68
I
Building L2
9
L6158
25.99 25.61
J
25.61
L6219
25.71
L6148 25.91 25.64
25.94
25.90 25.83
25 96 25.92
L6171
26.06
26.04
26 08 26.01
10 26 21 25.94
5B
25.89
26.25 25.88
L
26 14 25.86 25.89
26.12
L6161
L6168
25.94
M
25.96
L6020
26.02 25.96
L6122
Plan 3.30. Area L, Stratum III.
26.20 25.85
26.17 26.11
25.90 25.79
25.82
L6094
25.95
L6162
26.00 25.82 26 09 25.90
25.93
L6074
25.83
L6082
25 96 25.88
26.12 25.85
L6089 L6147 25.90
L6084
26 12 25.97
L6210 W 618 25.86
26 09 25.90
W60
25.84
L6170
L6063 L6224
W622 25.79 26.28 25.97
L6177
25.84
K
5A
25 88 25.73 25.88
L6198
26.04
26.26 26.03
M
L6151 26.00
26.02 25.96
L6093 25.98
L6034 L6037 25.97
W628
25.02
L6202
26 04 26.00
26 24 26.01
Building L3
7
L6045 26.11 26.00
W60
W6
L
L6081 L6070
25.93
L6080
25.94
W606
25.91
26 19 25.98
N
25.93
26.05
L6077 L6091
26.15 25.95
25 95
25.97 25.86
Pit(?)
26
W6
L6044 L6100 25.90
5
L6096 L6116 W 61
N
L6075 L6064
25 98 25.87
L6030 L6032
26.00
26.14 26.01
8
K
25.86 25.66
L6046
26.30 25.99
26.15 25.95
25.85
L6101
25.95
32
6
25 84 25.65
25.65
L6179 L6183
W61
L6092 L6126
W6
5
4
1
2
25 92 25.68
1
L6153
W63
3
J
W624
I
9
W63
8 W63
60 W
2
H
W607
26 11 26.04
26.34 25.91
26 30 25.96
W604
1
W60
W611
O
0
26.12
L6036
26.24 26.11
1
26 21
26.19
L6029
O
2
P
5 m
Stratum III, Phase B
Stratum III, Phase A
26.35 26.18
P
6
5
4
3
2
1
218 AMIR GOLANI
219
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
the east. Within the building, a beaten-earth floor (L6166) reached the base of W619, and debris buildup with no clear floor (L6158) was adjacent to W631 (Plan 3.28: Section 1-1). Outside the building, several beaten-earth surfaces (L6148, L6153, L6179/6183, L6219) were associated with the bases of the walls (Sqs I3–4, J4; Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2), those to the east of the building overlying the Stratum IV architecture below (Plan 3.28: Section 1-1). Building L3 East of Building L2 was another, much larger structure with the same orientation. It was founded directly on the Stratum IV remains and underwent several renovations in Phase IIIA. Like Building L2, Building L3 was built of mudbrick walls lacking a stone foundation, and its mudbricks were also extremely difficult to distinguish from the surrounding matrix. Building L3 consisted of an anteroom with an entranceway in the south, through which access was gained into a larger chamber. The anteroom was bounded by W624 in the west running north–south, which was separated by a 0.95 m wide entrance from W618, a short east–west wall that formed a broad, rounded corner with W609 in the east (Fig. 3.175). Wall 624 was preserved up to three courses and apparently continued southward outside the excavated area. Wall 609 was also preserved to three courses, while W618 was preserved up to only two courses. Within the anteroom was a beaten-earth floor (L6094, L6162) associated with the bases of the mudbrick walls and which continued into the large room to the north. In the center of the anteroom, within the southern balk of Sq L4, on Floor 6094 next to the base of W609, a complete storage jar lay on its side (Fig. 3.176; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming).
W605
W618
W609
Fig. 3.175. The rounded corner of Building L3 between W618 and W609, looking west. At upper center, Phase IIIA W605A.
220
AMIR GOLANI
The large room to the north of the anteroom was enclosed by W605B to the south, W637 to the west and W609 to the east. No clear evidence of a Phase IIIB northern wall was identified, although the Phase IIIA wall (W628) may indicate its location (see below). Wall 605B, preserved up to two courses, was badly damaged by a later wall (W605A). Its eastern end adjoined W624 of the anteroom, while its western Fig. 3.176. Storage jar on Floor 6094 in end apparently connected with W637. Of Building L3 anteroom, looking east. W637 to the east, only traces of dark brown mudbricks were observed (Plan 3.28: Section 2-2). A large segment of W609, preserved up W605A to three courses running southwest–northeast, W605B was exposed in Sq L4, and it is assumed that it continued in the balk between Sqs L3 and M3, although time constraints precluded its full exposure. If the suggested reconstruction L6063 of the Phase IIIB building is correct, the large inner room would have had a floor space of approximately 42 sq m and the adjacent anteroom, 6 sq m. Fig. 3.177. Storage jar on Phase IIIB Surface 6063, adjacent to W605B. A number of floors were identified within the main room of the building. In the northern portion was a floor apparently composed of segments of thin, white-colored material, possibly plaster (L6034/6037, L6093; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2). In the southern portion of the room, two superimposed floors were observed, the earlier one (L6094, L6170) associated with Phase IIIB, adjacent to the base of the mudbrick walls (Plan 3.28: Section 1-1). Several Phase IIIB beaten-earth surfaces were uncovered outside Building L3. South of the building and within the entranceway, Surface 6210 was associated with W618 and W624. West of W624 was a surface (L6177, L6198, L6063/6224) that was overlaid by numerous stones and a complete storage jar lying on its side (Fig. 3.177). Surface 6177 also reached the base of a mudbrick wall (W632) in Sq K5, of unclear plan, preserved up to one course. Farther north, in K3, another surface (L6101), positioned above a Stratum IV surface (L6104) and below a Phase IIIA surface (L6126; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2), may therefore be associated with Phase IIIB. East of the building, a surface (L6168) was observed at the base of the outer corner of W618 and W609. In Sq M4 was a beaten-earth surface (L6082) with some whitish-colored patches, which apparently continued into the adjoining square to the north (L6089/6147).
221
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Other Architectural Elements Farther east, W604, oriented north–south adjacent to and within the eastern balks of Sqs N3 and N4 (Fig. 3.178), was built of two parallel rows of small to medium-sized stones with a mudbrick and small stone fill in between. No adjoining walls were found, yet a segment of a mudbrick wall (W606) made of light cream-gray material was identified perpendicular to W604. Several beaten-earth surfaces were associated with these walls (L6030/6032, L6044/6100, L6064, L6075); Surface 6044/6100 lay directly above the Stratum IV remains and contained a concentration of animal bones (Fig. 3.179). To the north, a surface (L6081/6070) was associated with the top of Granary 6079 (Plan 3.28: Section 2-2), indicating that this structure, which originated in Stratum IV, continued to function in Stratum III. A segment of Stratum IV W615 also appears to have continued in use into Stratum III (Sq N3) as its upper mudbrick courses were associated with a Stratum III surface (L6070). A new wall (W626) of one row of mudbricks preserved up to one course high was added, nearly perpendicular, to W615. These two walls, along with another short line of stones protruding from W615 toward the northeast, may possibly be interpreted as a pit, or the beginning of another structure outside the excavated area. East of W604 (Sq O3), a beaten-earth surface with numerous ceramic remains upon it (L6029) was exposed below the Stratum II level (Fig. 3.180), while a similar surface (L6036), also strewn with ceramics and a complete basalt bowl, was uncovered in Sq O4 (Fig. 3.181; see Golani and Talis, forthcoming).
W602
W604 W611
W606
Fig. 3.178. Square N4, looking east. Stratum IV Compound W611 under Stratum III W604, overlaid by Stratum II W602. At center, Stratum III W606.
222
AMIR GOLANI
Southwest of W604, a concentration of stones in Sq N5 (W607), possibly the remnants of a wall or a pavement, was found directly above the Stratum IV level (see Fig. 3.169). To the east and west of this feature were beaten-earth surfaces (L6077/6091, L6080). Phase IIIA
Fig. 3.179. A concentration of animal bones on Stratum III Surface 6044/6100.
Building L3 The basic plan of this building was retained in Phase IIIA, but new stone walls were constructed on top of, or replaced, the previous mudbrick walls, and floors and surfaces were raised, both inside the building and in its immediate surroundings. In the southern portion of the building, W638 was composed of large kurkar stones and partially overlay W624. Another short stone wall (W622) was appended to this wall at a right angle. In the main room, W605B was Fig. 3.180. Stratum III Surface 6029 with pottery apparently partly dismantled and replaced remains, looking west. At right, Stratum II W601. by W605A, built of medium-sized stones in two rows with smaller chinking stones in between (Fig. 3.182). This wall bonded with W610, of similar construction but slightly wider, which was constructed upon the remains
Fig. 3.181. Stratum III Surface 6036 with ceramic remains, looking north.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
223
W605A L6046
Fig. 3.182. Phase IIIA W605A and Surface 6046, looking north.
of Phase IIIB W637, now largely dismantled (Plan 3.28: Section 2-2). To the north, W610 continued outside the excavated area, but probably cornered with the northern W628, built of medium-sized kurkar stones. Several scattered stones found on top of the eastern W609 may allude to a Phase IIIA stone wall here also that was superposed on the earlier mudbrick wall. Within the building, the floor of this phase (L6045, L6084) was only detected in its central southern portion, overlying the Phase IIIB W637 (Plan 3.28: Section 1-1), and was associated with the base of W605A. The area to the west of W638 and W622 was resurfaced with a new beaten-earth surface (L6171), which continued northward (L6046, L6092/6126) and was associated with W605A and W610 respectively (Sqs K3–4; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2). North of the building, another surface (L6202) was associated with W628, and east of the building, Phase IIIA beaten-earth surfaces were also found (L6020, L6074, L6122, L6161), where they incorporated a concentration of small stones and a portion of a stone pavement (L6074). The Western and Eastern Fringes (Plan 3.28) On the western fringe, a layer of slightly darker brown color was identified above the light brown layer of Stratum IV and may possibly be attributed to Stratum III. At the base of this layer, a beaten-earth and ash surface (L6073/6102) was overlaid by debris (L6068, L6131; Sqs F3, G4; Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2). On the eastern fringe, excavations in Sq R3 exposed the remains of a mudbrick wall (W623), typical of Stratum III, preserved up to one course high, with traces of a beatenearth surface at its base to the south (L6203) and north (L6201). Both the wall and its associated surfaces were founded on the basal dune and represent the earliest occupation
224
AMIR GOLANI
in this locale. Farther east, the dark brown compacted matrix of Stratum III thins out and disappears altogether in Sq V4. These findings indicate that Sqs U4 and V3 represent the easternmost limits of the Stratum III occupation in this area. Stratum II (Plan 3.31) Central Area L In Area L, the Stratum II remains were scanty and disjointed, and none of the architectural elements readily lent themselves to any clear plan. They lay close to the modern-day surface within a dark brown, compacted matrix with numerous white kurkar chips, the top of which was exposed directly below the overlying modern sand cover. As in other excavation areas, Stratum II was observed to have been founded directly over the remains of Stratum III, but occasionally with some evidence of an interlude in the form of debris or erosional buildup between the two. In nearly every instance in this area, Stratum II features were built with total disregard for previous remains. In Sq K3, a segment of a rough stone pavement (L6067) was revealed next to a portion of a stone wall (W612) preserved up to one course high. To the west of the pavement was a beaten-earth surface (L6041/6067). All these elements were founded directly atop those of Stratum III (see Fig. 3.167). To the east, several beaten-earth surfaces can be attributed to Stratum II (Sqs L3–4, M–N3; L6019, L6025, L6048, L6051; Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2). Surface 6048 in Sq N3, typical of the Stratum II surfaces in this area, was composed of scattered stones and ceramics on a compacted, dark brown matrix. This surface overlay Granary 6079 (see Fig. 3.174). To the south, this surface (L6059; Plan 3.28: Section 1-1) was associated with the base of W602, a short segment of stone wall preserved up to three courses (see Fig. 3.178). To the east, in Sq O3, a flimsy built wall (W601) of two rows of small stones preserved up to two courses,16 was traced across the square, but was not seen to continue in any of the adjoining squares. A short segment of a mudbrick wall (W627), preserved up to two courses and possibly including an entrance, was found northeast of the square (Fig. 3.183). Several beaten-earth surfaces (L6009, L6013, L6014) were associated with these walls. In the adjoining square to the north, another short wall segment (W603) oriented north–south and built of two rows of medium-sized to large stones with smaller chinking stones in between, was preserved up to one course high. It was squared off at its southern end, while its northern end lay beyond the excavated area. Adjacent to this wall was a beaten-earth surface (L6011/6015) upon which were several concentrations of stones and ceramic material (Fig. 3.184).
A wall of identical construction was uncovered in Area D (W137).
16
6
5
H
2
I
J
J
26.25 26.16
26 21 26.10
26.12
L6041 L6067
K
K
L
26.22
L6025
27.12
L6019
Plan 3.31. Area L, Stratum II.
26.30 26.12
L6138
26.28 26.10
L
M
26.14
L6051
M
26 11
L6048
N
N
26.24
L6059
26.56 26.13
26.68 26.33
0 O
27.37
26.25
26.25
2
26 52 26.39
Stratum II
26 53 26.24
L6013
L6012 26.63 26.35
L6014
L6009
26.40
L6011 L6015
L6028
26 49 26.03
L6120
W601
26.34 26.29
26 45 26.38
W603
26.62 26.22
1
26.69 26.39
O
7
4
1
I
62
3
2
H
W
W602
1
26.26
L6050
P
5 m
P
6
5
4
3
2
1
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
225
W61
2
226
AMIR GOLANI
W601 L6009
L6014
7
62
W
Fig. 3.183. Stratum II remains in Sq O3, looking west. Note W627 with its entrance.
Fig. 3.184. Stratum II Surface 6011/6015 with stone and ceramic concentrations. In upper center, post-Stratum II Burial 6012.
A probe (L6028) excavated east of W603 exposed a child burial (L6120) directly below the base of the wall. The skeleton, with the skull toward the south, was interred within a storage jar lacking the neck and rim (Figs. 3.185–3.187). An infant burial (L6012) resting on a Stratum II surface close to the modern-day surface (L6015), appears to postdate the occupation phase in this area. The burial, partially ringed by stones, consisted of a large ceramic fragment, probably of a storage jar, containing skeletal remains of an infant with its skull toward the north (Figs. 3.185, 3.188). The burial may have been covered with ceramic fragments, but these had certainly been eroded, or were removed when the overlying sand was cleared prior to excavation.
227
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
W603
L6015
Fig. 3.185. Stratum II remains in Sq O2, looking west. Wall 603 with Burial 6120 below it; in center, Burial 6012.
Fig. 3.186. Burial 6120 below Stratum II W603.
Fig. 3.187. Burial 6120.
The Western and Eastern Fringes (Plan 3.28) On the western side of the area, a layer of dark brown, compacted earth with numerous small white kurkar chips and some small stones, which can be associated with Stratum II (Sqs F3, G4; L6057, L6107, L6124), was found above a Phase III surface (Sq F3; L6073/6102; Plan 3.28: Sections 1-1, 2-2). On the eastern side of the area, a beaten-earth surface of dark brown, compacted earth (L6156), typical of Stratum II, with several large ceramic fragments upon it, lay above Stratum III
Fig. 3.188. Burial 6012 after the debris had been removed. Note the stones that ring the interment.
228
AMIR GOLANI
W623 and its associated surfaces (Sq R3; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2). The Stratum II surface continued to the west (L6009, L6014, L6050; Plan 3.28: Section 2-2), while to the east of Sq R3, the distinctive dark brown compacted matrix petered out, indicating that Sq S4 comprised the easternmost limit of the Stratum II occupation in this area, somewhat smaller than the easternmost limit of Stratum III.
Area J (Plans 3.32, 3.33) Area J is located near the top of the north–south kurkar ridge in the northwestern corner of the site (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3). Mechanical shaving appears to have partially damaged the uppermost layers of the Early Bronze Age remains, leaving a flat, leveled surface sloping slightly down to the south. Examination of a large, mechanically made section east of Area J (see below: Western Sand Dune (WSD) Section) showed a 0.5 m thick layer of sparse Byzantine occupation (Stratum I; Plan 3.33: Unit 1), covering a light brown-gray habitation layer of the Early Bronze Age in which decayed mudbricks, ceramic remains and several pits were discerned (Plan 3.33: Units 2, 3), founded on and cutting into the basal dune (Plan 3.33: Units 3, 4; see also Chapter 2: Fig. 2.6). Excavation of Area J began after the Byzantine remains had already been removed, although a few intrusions of depressions and sand pockets in the light brown-gray matrix of the underlying Early Bronze strata contained limited amounts of weathered ceramics, glass and other finds of the Byzantine period. Due to the peripheral location of Area J, a different excavation strategy was employed here. It was decided to focus on whatever remains were apparent on the modern-day surface at the start of excavations, rather than a broad lateral exposure. For this reason, Area J is composed of several clusters of squares around architectural elements seen on the surface (Fig. 3.189). The finds here were sparse, most of the excavation squares revealing only one stratum (III) founded on the basal dune, of which two phases were noted, as well as pits, a surface and a burial of Stratum II. No substantial remains attributable to Stratum IV were identified with any certainty. Stratum III (Plan 3.32) The Stratum III attribution is based on a close comparison of building styles and materials between the findings in Area J and those from other excavated areas of the site where a fuller stratigraphic sequence was exposed. Phase IIIB Of the earliest phase, only a portion of one wall (W209) was found at the southern end of the area along with several associated surfaces. The wall was constructed of light creamgray mudbricks with numerous calcite concretions, typical of Stratum III construction throughout the site. It was preserved up to four courses and laid on a foundation of small to medium-sized stones. A Stratum II pit cut into this wall (Fig. 3.190; and see below). This wall was traced for 5 m (Sqs F11–12), though no continuation was identified in Sq E11.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
229
Fig. 3.189. General view of Area J, looking west.
South of this wall was a beaten-earth surface (L2037, L2064/2127), while a similar surface to its north (L2041; Plan 3.32: Section 1-1) included a small patch of stone paving. North of W209, the stratified remains were found to be slightly higher, apparently constructed on a topographical rise. The Phase IIIB surface farther north in Sqs F13 and F14 (L2066/2070, L2071/2091; Plan 3.32: Section 1-1) was a thick lamination of dark gray-brown debris atop the basal dune. A burial of a child (L2116) was set into the surface (L2071) and dug partially into the basal dune (Fig. 3.191; Plan 3.32: Section 2-2). It consisted of a medium-sized storage jar lying on its side with the opening toward the north. Much of the neck and most of the rim of the jar had been broken off to facilitate insertion of the child, the body flexed on its right side and the skull near the opening (Fig. 3.192). An irregular-shaped pit extended to the north of the burial, but no other remains were found associated with it. Phase IIIA Most of the archaeological features in Area J were assigned to this phase, which appears to have been the last significant occupation in this area. The remains may be divided into three major units, here described from north to south. Granary 2007 In the northernmost portion of Area J, the outlines of a small, circular mudbrick granary were clearly evident at the start of excavation. The granary (outer diam. 2.8 m, inner diam. 1.8 m) was constructed of one row of light cream-gray mudbricks and preserved down to ten courses below ground (W201; Fig. 3.193). The base of the wall and the associated
230
AMIR GOLANI
C
D
E
F
G
H
31.01 30.94
20 L2130 30.74 30.46
W201
30.82 29.89
20
L2123
L2007 29.81
30.78 29.91
19
19
18
18
30.36 30.08
17
L2050 30.06
W2
17
W
22
3
06
16
30.62 30.42
L2030
29.83
30.29 30.10
30.35 30.27
L2043 30.10
16
Northern Compound
15
15
Plan 3.32. Area J, composite plan, Strata III–II and Sections 1-1–2-2.
231
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
15
15 1
29.98 29.90 30.00 29.91
L2022 29.80
L2092
W207
L2011 29.40
2
L2010
29.74 29.43
13
29.52
29.97 29.40
29.81 29.40
29.40 29.09
2
29.85 29.68
29.71 29.34 29.52 29.39
L2018 29.29
29.70
L2016 29.70 L2021 L2066 29.52 L2070
29.88 26.29
Southern Compound
29.10 28.23
29.13
L2038 L2065 9 20 W
L2013 29.54
L2041
29.56
29.16
D
E
L2058 29.13
29.52 28.41
29.63 29.58
29.51 29.32 29.60 29.43
11
Stratum II
L2032
Stratum III, Phase A
29.27
29.34
10
29.48 29.34
29.03
29.66 29.46 29.71 29.35
C
20
L2055 L2057
29.59 29.15
28.97
12
29.31 29.10
Stratum III, Phase B
1
29.73 29.34
L2023 L2047
L2015 L2037
L2064 L2029 28.29 L2127
29.38 29.28
5 29.59
W20
29.48 29.11
W
L2013
29.21
29.08 28.95
29.00
11
L2053 3
L2034 29.25
13
L2128
29.60 29.22
12
14
L2071 L2091 L2116
29.69
12
2 W20
W2
30.04 29.44
W204
14
F
0
5 m
G
H
Plan 3.32 (cont.). Area J, composite plan, Strata III–II and Sections 1-1–2-2.
10
28 00
29 00
30 00
28 00
29 00
30 00
L2022
Basal dune
L2071
W205
L2116 Burial
L2091
W207
F14
L2127
L2064
F11
L2092
2-2
W202
W209
L2011
E14
L2041
W202
L2034
F12
1-1
Pit
F1
F13 W204
L2070
L2066
L2021
L2016
L2018
W204
Plan 3.32 (cont.). Area J, composite plan, Strata III–II and Sections 1-1–2-2.
L2029 W207
Basal dune
F14
L2071
L2022
232 AMIR GOLANI
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
233
beaten-earth floor (L2007) within the granary were dug into the basal dune. This structure was full of gray-brown debris. No clear surface was found outside the granary; however, a large fragment of a storage-jar base (L2130) found near the upper portion of W201 to the west, may represent the level of such a surface.
W203
W209
Fig. 3.190. Phase IIIB W209 and Phase IIIA W203 cut by Stratum II Pit 2038/2065.
Fig. 3.191. Phase IIIB Burial 2116 set into Surface 2071 and cutting into the basal dune.
Fig. 3.192. Burial 2116 after the upper portion of the vessel was removed.
Fig. 3.193. Phase IIIA Granary 2007, looking north.
234
AMIR GOLANI
The Northern Compound In the central part of Area J, another circular mudbrick granary and fragmentary segments of a wall may indicate the presence of a compound. Granary 2030 (outer diam. 3.5 m, inner diam. 2.85 m) was built of one row of light cream-gray mudbricks preserved up to three courses above ground (W206; Fig. 3.194). Within the granary was a beaten-earth floor (L2030). The base of the granary was dug about 0.2 m into the underlying basal dune, but most of this granary appears to have been a freestanding, above-ground structure. The entire area to the west of the structure was badly damaged by later intrusions of deep sand pockets, yet a few stones and mudbricks suggest the presence of a wall (W223) that may have connected with the granary to form an enclosure wall, as in the southern compound (see below). The Southern Compound In the southern half of Area J, a limited portion of the eastern part of a compound was exposed, which appears to comprise an enclosure wall (W207, W205, W212) that incorporated and circumscribed several mudbrick storage facilities, all built of light creamgray mudbricks (Fig. 3.195). The eastern wall of the compound (W207) was preserved up to one course of mudbricks set on one row of small to medium-sized kurkar stones. This wall abutted the upper courses of the wall of Granary 2018 at its southern end, and was traceable for 8 m to the north, curving to the west beyond the excavation area (Fig. 3.196; Plan 3.32: Section 1-1). The southern wall of the compound (W205) was constructed of two rows of medium-sized to large kurkar stones with mudbrick material between the stones (Figs. 3.197, 3.198). This wall was traced for almost 10 m and at its eastern end adjoined the wall of horseshoe-shaped Granary 2015. At the western end of this wall, its stone rows stood on two courses of mudbricks. It is unclear whether this was a construction feature of the wall,
Fig. 3.194. Remains of the northern compound, looking west.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
235
or evidence of another architectural feature below it that was not uncovered. Wall 212, a short segment preserved up to two courses and set on a partial foundation of small kurkar stones, was attached to Granary 2015 from the east.
Fig. 3.195. General view of the southern compound at the end of the excavations, looking east. W202
L2011
W204 W207
L2018 L2116
Fig. 3.196. Phase IIIA Compound W207 and Granaries 2011 and 2018, looking west. At lower right Phase IIIB Burial 2116.
236
W 20
3
AMIR GOLANI
W2
L2015
05
W2
09
Fig. 3.197. Phase IIIA Granary 2015, looking east. A Stratum II Pit (L2038/2065) cut through the granary, revealing the bottom of Stratum IV W209. To the right of the granary is a storage-jar base (arrow).
W203
5
20
W
Fig. 3.198. Granary 2015 and Compound W205, looking north.
Granary 2018. This installation was built of a circular mudbrick wall (outer diam. 2.1 m, inner diam. 1.7 m) inserted into the basal dune and preserved up to nine courses (W204; see Fig. 3.196). The upper two courses were associated with a beaten-earth surface (L2016/ L2021) on the outside, indicating that about 0.4 m of this granary was subterranean (Plan 3.32: Section 1-1). Within the granary was a beaten-earth floor (L2018). The above-ground portion was built of two rows of mudbricks, while that found below ground was constructed
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
237
of only one row. This may be explained by the need for a thicker and stronger wall for the freestanding above-ground structure. Granary 2015. This horseshoe-shaped installation, built of a curving mudbrick wall (outer dimensions 3.2–3.5 m, inner dimensions 2.4–2.7 m), was preserved up to five courses (W203; see Fig. 3.197). While its western side was found open, it may have actually been closed by a continuation of the wall that was cut by a Stratum II pit (see below). Within the granary, a beaten-earth floor (L2015) was exposed at the very top of Phase IIIB W209. The entire installation sloped down slightly to the east. Granary 2011. Inside the compound to the west of Granary 2018, this large granary was built of a circular mudbrick wall (W202; outer diam. 4 m, inner diam. 3 m) and preserved up to seven courses (see Fig. 3.196). The upper portion of the granary was above ground, while at least 0.3 m of the structure was below the beaten-earth surface associated with it from the outside (L2092, L2010). Within the granary was a beaten-earth floor (L2011). That this structure was partially underground is evident from a foundation trench observed adjacent to W202 (Plan 3.32: Section 2-2). Within the compound, several beaten-earth surfaces were associated with the bases of the enclosure wall and the granaries (L2010, L2023/2047, L2029, L2034, L2092; Plan 3.32: Section 2-2). In the corner between W205 and Granary 2015, was the base of a storage jar (see Fig. 3.197). Similar surfaces were exposed outside the compound (L2016/2021, L2022, L2032, L2053, L2058). To the south of Granary 2018 was an infant burial in a storage jar (L2128; Fig. 3.199) just below Surface 2021, from which it was apparently interred. The jar was lying on its side with the opening toward the northeast, its neck missing. Removal of the upper portion of the vessel exposed the skeleton (Fig. 3.200).
Fig. 3.199. Burial 2128 adjacent to W204, after removal of Surface 2021.
Fig. 3.200. Burial 2128 after removal of the upper portion of the vessel.
238
AMIR GOLANI
Stratum II (Plan 3.32) Scanty remains founded directly on the exposed surface were assigned to the final phase of the Early Bronze Age occupation in this area. None of the Stratum III features described above appear to have continued into Stratum II and, as in other areas of the site, the builders ignored any remains of the earlier settlement that were Fig. 3.201. Burial 2123 after removal of the upper ceramic still visible, probably after an occupation fragments; skull at left. hiatus at the site. In the southern portion of the excavated area, a pit (L2038, L2065) may have removed a portion of Phase IIIA W203, and also cut into Phase IIIB W209 (see Figs. 3.190, 3.197). To the upper part of this pit may be associated a beaten-earth surface (L2013) to its west, which incorporated a rounded installation, possibly a hearth, composed of pottery sherds and small stones. A few concentrations of stones in this area, all of which appear to postdate the Stratum III remains, may also be attributed to Stratum II. In the northern portion of the excavated area (Sq H20), an infant burial, possibly two (L2123) was exposed, lying on its side with the skull toward the north (Fig. 3.201) and covered with several large ceramic fragments. Although this feature was not found in stratigraphic association with any other stratified elements in Area J, its position close to the modern surface and its similarity to other infant burials of Stratum II make its attribution to Stratum II likely. Western Sand Dune (WSD) Section (Plan 3.33) Some 15 m to the east of Area J, where the eastern half of the kurkar ridge was removed by modern mechanical equipment, a large north–south section through the ridge was obtained (Plan 3.33; see Chapter 2: Fig. 2.6). Here, the Early Bronze Age remains were founded on the basal sand dune at higher elevation than in Area A, 20 m to the east, where the top of the basal dune was at least 2 m lower, evidence of the slope on which the settlement was established. Examination of Section WSD provided evidence of the uppermost remains (Byzantine Stratum I) that had been destroyed to the east by modern equipment (Plan 3.33: Unit 1; see also Chapter 2: WSD Section: Unit 1) and may be relevant to the stratigraphic linkage between Areas J and A. In both areas, the stratified remains were shallow, seldom exceeding 0.5 m, and founded directly on the basal dune. In Area J, the two main building phases identified in the excavation were associated with Stratum III, while only meager remains were assigned to Stratum II. In the upper reaches of Section WSD, architectural remains of truncated mudbrick walls, associated floors and debris buildup were observed (Plan 3.33: Unit 2; see also Chapter 2: WSD Section: Unit 2), and these are probably to be equated with Stratum III. In Area A as well, Stratum III was the major occupation, while
27 00
28 00
29 00
30 00
31 00
28 00
29 00
30 00
31 00
a
a
623 100
623 150
0
b
b
30 m
Area I
Area J
W
Area H
Area A
SD
159 750
159 750
159 800
159 800
623 200
623 100
623 150
623 200
28 00
29 00
30 00
31 00
Plan 3.33. Section WSD.
WSD-3
WSD-2
WSD-1
b
b
a
a
Unit 5: Pre-settlement
Unit 4: Pre-settlement
Unit 3: EB IA Stratum IV(?)
Unit 2: EB IB Stratum III(?)
Unit 1: Byzantine Stratum I
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
240
AMIR GOLANI
Stratum IV consisted of two subterranean silos with no other architectural features. In Section WSD Unit 3, traces of habitational buildup are apparent, and a few scattered pits penetrate deep into the basal dune; thus, Unit 3 in Section WSD is probably to be associated with Stratum IV.
Area E (Plan 3.34) Area E is located at the southern end of the site, about 30 m south of Area G. On the crest of the westernmost north–south kurkar ridge, some 70 m to the west of Area E, previous excavations had uncovered remains of a Byzantine occupation (Milevski et al. 2018), but no evidence of the Early Bronze Age. By the time of the present excavations, modern earth-moving activities had cut a north–south swath at the eastern base of the kurkar ridge, removing at least 1 m of the overlying sand and thus whatever Byzantine remains had existed here. In the upper part of the western face of this swath cut by the bulldozers, a thin layer of the Byzantine occupation was observed. This layer was separated by 1.0–1.5 m of sterile earth from the earlier EB I archaeological horizon in Area E. Area E was subdivided into two clusters of excavation squares, north and south. Northern Area E The excavation squares in northern Area E clustered around a few stones that were seen to protrude slightly from the modern surface after this area had been partially shaved by bulldozer work (Fig. 3.202). The meager architectural remains exposed here consisted of two stone walls forming a right-angled corner (W63, W64), preserved up to two courses (Sq K21), and a beaten-earth surface between (L607) and outside (L608, L609) these walls. The entire area of Sqs H–K22, I–K21 and I–J20 was characterized by a very shallow occupation level, poor in finds, lying directly on a sterile layer of light brown, marly earth (L610, L611/626, L612/616, L620/636, L621/627, L625/637, L630, L632), and two pits (L642, L661). South of this concentration, four trial squares (G16, G–H/18, J18) produced sterile, light brown marly earth devoid of finds or occupation debris, directly below the sand. While the finds in northern Area E were very poor, they are significant as evidence that the southernmost boundary of the settlement was located in this area. Despite the meager nature of the finds and the fact that only a single phase was identified in this area, these remains are tentatively attributed to Stratum III as it was the most extensive and intensive occupation at the EB I site of Barne’a. Southern Area E The remains of at least 23 rectangular stone installations (possibly burial cists) were visible on the modern surface in the southern part of Area E (labeled F1–F23; Figs. 3.203–3.206). The upper portions of these features were excavated, although only two were fully exposed down to their base.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
Fig. 3.202. General view of northern Area E at the end of excavation, looking south.
Fig. 3.203. Part of southern Area E at the end of excavation, looking north. Note the rectangular installations in the excavated squares.
241
242
D
AMIR GOLANI
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L610
28.22
28.50
L621 L627
28.03 28.01
28.06
L620 L636
21
L612 L616
L611 L626
28.09
L632
Northern Area E
28.10
28.17 28.00
L608
27.88
L661
22
L609
28.00
W63
W6 4
22
L
L607 27.98
21
28.10 27.99
L642
20
L625 L637 28.02
28.16 28.08
L630
28.11
20
19
19
18
18
17
17
16
16
15
15
14
14
Plan 3.34. Area E (north).
243
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
13
L645
29.30
13 29.15
Southern Area E
29.42
F1
29.24 29.43
12
F3
29.13
12
F2
29.22
28.41
29.11
28.47 28.61
11
F5
28.28
28.24
L646 L662
29.28
11
28.37
F4 29.18
10
28.63
L667
28.56 28.68
29.13
10
28.66
27.02
F6 28.69
L649
28.74 28.70
L666
28.47
28.70 28.55
9 28.69
F9
28.61 28.64
28.64
28.56
28.63
27.56 26.92 27.55
F10
28.53 28.64
28.62
28.67
8
28.45 28.56
27.41
L651 28.67 F12
F11
28.53
28.56
7
28.56
F14 28.26
F19 F18
27.57
27.59 27.00
8
F13 27.38
28.62
L652 L660 L663
F21
F20
27.43
28.37
9
27.61 27.06
28.49
F8
F7
6
L650
L665
7
28.02
28.16
L653 L664
27.47
F15
27.55
F22
F23
6
27.50
27.52
5
5
27.84
27.89
F16
27.93
4
L654 L659 27.85
27.75
27.31
27.74
27.20 27.20
4
27.24
F17 27.22
27.20 27.09
3
3
2
2
1
1 0 D
5 E
m F
G
H
I
Plan 3.34 (cont.). Area E (south).
J
K
L
244
AMIR GOLANI
Fig. 3.204. Feature 9 in southern Area E.
Fig. 3.205. Feature 16 in southern Area E.
Fig. 3.206. Features 18 and 19 in southern Area E.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
245
All these features were built of medium-sized to large kurkar stones usually not dressed, though in some cases the use of stone slabs, possibly worked, was also observed. In one case, square, dark gray mudbricks were employed instead of kurkar stones (F2). The features range in size from 1.0 to 1.6 m in length and 0.8 to 1.25 m in width, and were all oriented southwest–northeast, some in clusters and others solitary. All appear to have been dug into the sterile light brown marly earth. In one case, two such features (F18, F19) were built adjacent to one another, with an upright stone slab comprising the partition wall between them (Fig. 3.206). As the size, outline and orientation of these features are suggestive of burial cists, excavation within them was deferred due to religious constraints. Excavation was only completed in the two adjacent features (F18, F19), revealing them devoid of finds. Barring proper archaeological excavation of these features, their function and chronological association remain speculative. Two similar cists containing fragmentary osteological remains and a small number of ceramic and glass fragments, including a Roman glass candlestick bottle, were uncovered in rescue excavations on the other side of the kurkar ridge (Milevski et al. 2018:166–167, Area B), although these finds could have been intrusive. As further support of their possible use as burial cists, it should be noted that similar, but smaller cists arranged adjacently in a row were used for secondary burials in Area F (see below). If the cists in Area E had served for burial purposes, they could only have contained primary burials of animals, children or adults in a contracted position, or secondary burials. The fact that no fragmentary osteological remains were found in Area E suggests that if they were burial cists, they held interments that were later removed to be re-buried at another locale. As to their chronological association—all these features were apparently dug into the same sterile, light brown marly earth on which the meager Early Bronze Age remains in northern Area E were founded. A few finds, primarily of late Byzantine date, were recovered in the mixed topsoil on and around the top of the stones. As noted above, visual inspection of the section on the western boundary of Area E, above Features F1, F2 and F4, showed that the Byzantine level had been situated approximately 1 m above these features, indicating that they had either been dug down from this occupation, or more likely predate it.
Area F (Plan 3.35) This area is located at the far western side of the site, in the pipeline trench. Excavation was undertaken after mechanical equipment had removed all of the overlying sand dune, exposing the outline of a feature built of kurkar stones set into the sterile marly earth. The surrounding matrix was also removed prior to excavation, leaving this feature as a kind of ‛island.ʼ As a result, a single excavation square (4 × 4 m) was opened, revealing a unique construction of a chain of ten rectangular burial cists oriented east–west (L702–L711; Figs. 3.207, 3.208). The cists were built of thin kurkar slabs and vary in size from 0.3 to 0.4 m wide and 0.4 to 0.8 m long, each cist sharing at least one common dividing slab with a neighbor. The bottom of each cist consisted of a kurkar slab, and each cist was covered
246
AMIR GOLANI
25 82 25 51 L711
25 82 25 51
25 82 25 52
L710
L709 25 82 25 52 L708
25 82 25 53 L707
25 82 25 53
25 82 25 54 L705
L706
25 82 25 54
25 82 25 56
L704
L703
25 82 25 56
0
1 m
L702
Plan 3.35. Area F.
with another such slab. There was no continuation of the line to the north or south, and no remains overlay this feature. The cists contained only secondary burials. The two southernmost cists (L702, L703) were damaged by later intrusions that had removed most of the stones and the bones within. Between one and three interments were identified in each cist (see Nagar, forthcoming). The skulls were placed in the western part of the cist. The long bones lay in bundles lengthwise within the cist, and some of the cists also contained rib bones. No burial offerings were found. The lack of associated burial goods and the absence of a stratigraphic relation with other finds in the immediate vicinity, pose a problem in dating these burials. Samples of collagen from the bones and teeth for were not sufficient in quantity for 14C analysis (Golani and Nagar 2011:86). However, the proximity of these burial cists to the Early Bronze Age site would seem to attest to an association with one or more of the EB I strata.
CHAPTER 3: THE STRATIGRAPHY
247
Fig. 3.207. The burial cists in Area F, looking east.
Fig. 3.208. Burial Cists 704 and 705, looking east.
R eferences Goder-Goldberger M. Forthcoming. The Flint Assemblages. In AB II. Golani A. and Talis S. Forthcoming. The Ceramic Assemblages. In AB II. Ktalav I. Forthcoming. The Mollusks. In AB II. Milevski I., Bijovsky G., Sandhaus D., Krokhmalnik A. and Gorin–Rosen Y. 2018. A Byzantine Settlement on the Northernmost Kurkar Ridge of Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C Neighborhood. ‘Atiqot 91:159–192. Nagar Y. Forthcoming. Human Skeletal Remains and Mortuary Practices. In AB II. Rosenberg D. Forthcoming. The Groundstone Assemblage. In AB II. Zidane A. and Bar-Oz G. Forthcoming. The Faunal Assemblages. In AB II.
A. Golani, 2019, Ashqelon Barne a The Early Bronze Age Site I (IAA Reports 65)
Chapter 4
Architecture and Settlement Planning Amir Golani
The excavations at Ashqelon Barne‘a unearthed a wealth of architectural remains from EB I Strata IV–II (see Chapter 3) that reflect on the development of the settlement and the way of life of the inhabitants. This chapter presents a synthesis of the data.
Architecture The state of preservation of the Early Bronze Age remains was relatively poor, as most of the architecture was constructed of sun-dried mudbricks that disintegrate quickly when exposed to the elements. Thus, most of the mudbrick walls had survived no higher than one or two courses, while others were identified only by the line of their stone foundation, the mudbricks long eroded away. After abandonment of the site at the end of Stratum II, the uppermost remains were exposed to the elements for nearly three and a half millennia, until the Roman–Byzantine period, when the area was covered by a layer of sand of varying thickness (see Chapter 2). Byzantine pits (Stratum I), and natural intrusions such as sand pockets, were present throughout the site, often destroying large chunks of the Early Bronze Age architecture. Finally, modern disturbances took a heavy toll on the site––large areas, primarily in the southern third of the site, were destroyed by earth-moving machinery prior to excavation, and removal of the overlying sand dune also took away a portion of the uppermost strata. Construction Techniques The materials used for construction were all local, consisting primarily of mudbrick and stone, as well as plaster, though it is quite feasible that other materials that leave little or no trace in the archaeological record, such as wood, were also employed. Mudbrick Walls The use of mudbricks for construction was predominant in Strata IV–III. Although mudbricks were also used in Stratum II, the frequency cannot be determined due to erosion. During Strata IV–III, some mudbrick walls were founded upon a continuous stone foundation and some were not. During Stratum II, use of stone foundations appears to have been the norm. The mudbrick walls were often difficult to differentiate from the surrounding matrix during excavation. Based on color and texture, the outlines of a wall, and occasionally of the bricks themselves, could sometimes be identified. The bricks were usually rectangular (see Appendix 3). No specific arrangement of mudbricks was discerned; they were layered
250
AMIR GOLANI
as one or more rows of headers, stretchers or both. The mudbricks were usually separated by regular gaps about 1 cm wide that were filled with a dense, dark gray earthen material. At times, broken mudbricks were also employed in wall construction; a similar technique was noted in Early Bronze Age architecture at Lod (Lass 2006). In Stratum III, evidence for the facing of mudbrick walls with small stones was observed in Area K. During excavation, different types of mudbricks were identified by their color, texture and inclusions. Stratum IV. The mudbricks used in this stratum were of soft, well-levigated clay, generally brown to orange-brown or light brown in color with few inclusions (see Appendix 3). Their identification in the field was extremely difficult due to the similarity in color and texture to the surrounding matrix. Stratum III. A new type of mudbrick was observed in Stratum III, although the Stratum IV mudbricks continued in use. The new mudbrick type was made of dense, marly sand, light cream-gray or light brown-gray in color containing numerous calcite concretions (see Appendix 3). The raw material and the inclusions yielded a denser, heavier brick than those of Stratum IV, stronger and less prone to erosion by wind and rain. The distinctiveness of this material was such that it became one of the parameters for identification of Stratum III architecture throughout the site. Stratum II. Only three mudbrick walls were identified in Stratum II. Though scarce, the bricks appear to have been identical in color and texture to those identified in Stratum IV. Stone Walls Stone walls were found throughout the main strata at the site (IV–II). Only local kurkar stone was used. The small to medium-sized kurkar stones may have detached by erosion from nearby outcrops of the underlying kurkar, and larger chunks may have been pried out. No clear evidence for quarrying was found, although it is known, for example, from contemporaneous Qiryat Ata (Golani 2003:21–22, 75). In Strata IV and III, stone construction was actually scarce, employed only sporadically as foundations for mudbrick superstructures and for some installations. The stone foundation walls were preserved up to one–four courses and composed of two rows of medium-sized to large kurkar stones with smaller chinking stones in between (e.g., Area G; see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.154). Due to the plastic nature of sun-dried mudbricks, stone foundations were often constructed to create a sturdy base upon which to lay the bricks and prevent the wall from sinking, cracking and eventually collapsing. In Stratum II, nearly all the walls had stone foundations of small to medium-sized kurkar stones, which supports the hypothesis that the water level rose at the end of EB I (see Chapter 2), undermining the stability of mudbrick architecture. Other techniques in the use of stone were observed. In some mudbrick walls, stones were set intermittently along the edges of the wall, delineating its outline (e.g., Stratum III W7 in southern Area A; see Chapter 3: Plan 3.2). Such stones may have served to counter
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
251
lateral pressure of the mudbrick superstructure, although they could not have served as a base against the vertical pressures exerted. Another technique was the use of a stone row functioning as a stabilizing agent around which a terre pisée wall may have been constructed (e.g., Stratum III W501 in Area K; see Chapter 3: Plan 3.16). An architectural feature specific to Stratum II in Areas D, K and L was the construction of straight walls no wider than 0.20–0.25 m, built of two rows of small kurkar stones (e.g., W601; see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.183). Floors/Surfaces Three types of floors and surfaces were uncovered: beaten earth, stone and mudbrick. The most common type was that of beaten earth, encountered throughout the site and used in roofed as well as open areas. A rough level of evenly and densely spread, fist-sized stones is here termed a stone pavement, although it may have served as a bedding for a beaten-earth floor as well (e.g., Stratum III Building D8; see Chapter 3: Figs. 3.128, 3.129). Pavements of mudbrick were of two varieties: closely set mudbrick fragments, seen in Areas A and G (e.g., Stratum III Granary 141; see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.9), and mudbricks carefully laid as tiles, as in the entrance to the Stratum III walled compound in Area A (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.2) and in Phase IIIA Granary 1340 in Area D (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.22). Floors constructed of mudbrick fragments appear to have been used in storage installations, probably to safeguard against humidity and rodent burrowing from below. The Use of Plaster While none of the EB I walls at the site exhibited any clear traces of plaster, the mudbrick walls were probably covered regularly with some form of plaster or mud material, although this had apparently eroded over time. The only evidence for the use of plaster in the broad sense was a lining of light gray-brown, non-hydraulic plaster at the bottom of Stratum IV Silo 156 in Area A (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.2), and a whitish material, possibly plaster, on some floors. Architectural Plans The excavations at Ashqelon Barne‘a uncovered domestic and public buildings, as well as storage facilities, all constructed using the materials and techniques described above. Although not all the buildings were completely exposed, either due to incomplete preservation or partial excavation, the plans of most can be reasonably reconstructed. In general, three main building plans were revealed: elliptical, rectilinear with rounded corners and rectilinear with angled corners (Table 4.1).1
Although ‘buildingʼ and ‘structureʼ are not identical terms (see Chapter 1: Methodology), for the sake of clarity, the term ‘buildingʼ will be used in most cases in the following section. 1
252
AMIR GOLANI
Table 4.1. Domestic and Public Buildings by Stratum, Type and Function Stratum
Area
Elliptical
Rounded Corners
Angled Corners
Unclear
IV
D
IV
D
IV
H
Building H1
IV
L
Building L1
IV
M
IV–III
G
Building G1
IV–III
G
Building G2
IV–III
G
IV–III
G
III(?)
A
Structure A1
Domestic
III
A
Building A2
Domestic
III
D
Structure D7
III
D
III
D
Structure D4
Public
III
D
Structure D5
Unclear
III
D
Structure D6
Public
III
D
Structure D9
Unclear
III
I
Structure I1
Unclear
III
K
III
K
Building K2
Unclear*
III
K
Structure K3
Unclear
III
L
Building L2
Domestic
III
L
Building L3
Domestic
III–II
K
Building K4
Public
II
K
Structure K5
Domestic(?)
Structure D1
Function Domestic
Structure D2
Unclear Domestic Domestic
Building M1
Domestic Domestic Domestic
Building G3
Public Structure G4
Unclear
Domestic Structure D3
Domestic
Building K1
Domestic
* Due to the amorphic plan of this structure, it is unclear whether it can actually be defined as an elliptical building or a round storage installation.
Domestic Architecture Curvilinear domestic architecture is one of the hallmarks of EB I in the southern Levant (Braun 1989; Golani 1999). At Ashqelon Barne‘a Strata IV–III, two forms of curvilinear domestic structures were revealed: elliptical and rectilinear with rounded corners. Rectilinear buildings with straight walls and angled corners appear from Stratum III onward. Elliptical Buildings The remains of at least five elliptical buildings were exposed in Areas G, H, K and L (Table 4.2). In Area G, these consisted of a stone foundation that probably originally carried a mudbrick superstructure, as in Building L1. In all other cases, these buildings were built entirely of mudbrick with little or no stone foundation. The elliptical buildings generally consisted of one room, occasionally with an inner division. Of the four buildings whose inner floor space could be calculated with reasonable certainty, it ranged from 28 to 36 sq m, with an average of 33.5 sq m. The Area L building and the two buildings in Area G
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
253
Table 4.2. Elliptical Domestic Buildings by Stratum Stratum
Area
Building/ Structure
Walls
Internal Division
Approx. Inner Floor Space (sq m)
IV
H
H1
Mudbrick
Unclear
Unclear
IV
L
L1
Mudbrick and stone
Yes
35
IV–III
G
G1
Mudbrick and stone
Yes
28
IV–III
G
G2
Mudbrick and stone
Yes
35
III
K
K1
Mudbrick and stone
No
36
were founded in Stratum IV, the latter two apparently continuing into Stratum III. The one definite elliptical building in Area K was founded in Stratum III. Thus, elliptical buildings in general appear to have been a phenomenon of Stratum IV that continued into Stratum III. Rectilinear Buildings with Rounded Corners The remains of seven domestic buildings with rounded outer corners were identified in Areas A, D, L and M. These were usually built of mudbrick, sometimes laid on a stone foundation. They consisted primarily of one room, and only in Structure D1 were there remains of an inner partition wall. Of the four buildings whose inner floor space could be calculated with reasonable certainty, it ranged from 28 to 50 sq m, with an average of 38.5 sq m (Table 4.3). Rectilinear buildings with rounded corners first appeared during Stratum IV and became more common in Stratum III. In both strata, they apparently coexisted alongside the elliptical building tradition. A single example of what appears to have been a Stratum II wall with a rounded corner in Area K (W522; see Chapter 3: Plan 3.17) may indicate a limited continuation of this building style into Stratum II as well. Table 4.3. Domestic and Public Buildings with Rounded Corners, by Stratum Stratum
Area
Building/ Structure
Walls
Internal Division
Approx. Inner Floor Space (sq m)
IV
D
D1
Mudbrick and stone
Yes
Unclear
IV
M
M1
Mudbrick
No
28
IV–III
G
G3
Mudbrick and stone
No
72
III(?)
A
A1
Stone foundation
Unclear
Unclear
III
A
A2
Mudbrick
No
28
III
D
D7
Mudbrick and stone
Unclear
50
III
L
L2
Mudbrick
No
Unclear
III
L
L3
Mudbrick and stone
No
48
Rectilinear Buildings with Angled Corners Two domestic buildings with clearly angled corners were identified in the excavations, although none were sufficiently exposed to reveal a complete plan. Structure D3 was built of mudbricks only, while Structure K5 had a stone foundation. These two rectilinear buildings are attributed to Strata III and II respectively (Table 4.4).
254
AMIR GOLANI
Table 4.4. Domestic and Public Buildings with Angled Corners, by Stratum Stratum
Area
Building/ Structure
Walls
Internal Division
Approx. Inner Floor Space (sq m)
III
D
D3
Mudbrick
Unclear
Unclear
III–II
K
K4
Mudbrick and stone
Yes
Unclear
II
K
K5
Stone foundation
Unclear
Unclear
Ashqelon Barne‘a and the Development of Domestic Architecture during EB I The evolution of domestic architectural plans in the southern Levant during the protohistoric periods shows a cyclical development from the Chalcolithic period into the Early Bronze Age. During the Chalcolithic period, domestic buildings consisted of rectilinear broadrooms, usually with no internal division (Porath 1992). The subsequent EB IA is notable for the appearance of elliptical structures (Braun 1989) with some internal division. While the curvilinear building style was not exclusive to this period, it does appear to have been prevalent throughout EB IA and into EB IB. During a later phase of EB IB, elliptical buildings appear to have been gradually replaced by rectilinear buildings with rounded outer corners (Golani 1999). The rounded-corner building tradition begins during EB IB throughout the southern Levant and continues into the beginning of EB II (Golani 1999). Finally, during EB II, architectural development came full circle with the total abandonment of the curvilinear building tradition in favor of rectilinear broadroom building plans. The architectural elements uncovered at Ashqelon Barne‘a fit well into this evolutionary pattern. All three architectural styles were present at the site, with both elliptical and rounded-corner buildings appearing together in Strata IV and III. While the former tradition was clearly superseded by the latter in Area L, in Area G they appear to have been contemporaneous in Stratum IV: elliptical domestic buildings and a rounded-corner public building (Building G3, see below). Elliptical buildings are absent in Stratum II, when buildings with angled corners became the norm. As rounded-corner buildings are known to have existed in EB IB and into EB II (Golani 1999), they could be dated to either one of these periods. However, their coexistence with elliptical structures whose chronological range ends within EB IB, strengthens the attribution of both Strata IV and III to EB I and indicates a certain period of overlap in which both architectural styles co-existed. As only one wall (W522) may represent the existence of a rounded-corner building in Stratum II, and most of the Stratum II architecture was of the angled-corner tradition, this stratum can be dated to the very end of EB IB at the earliest, or early EB II at the latest. Public Architecture Definitions of what constitutes a public building are usually based on such criteria as size, building technique, plan, contents or specific location in relation to other elements at the site (see, e.g., Genz 2010). However, these parameters are relative in comparison to those
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
255
of the domestic buildings at a site. In this light, public structures at Ashqelon Barne‘a can be identified in Areas D, G and K. Area D appears to have been somewhat different in a number of aspects from the other excavation areas, as it had the thickest accumulation of anthropogenic deposits, large and irregularly shaped structures, and no burials. The identification of Area D as the central, possibly public portion of the site arises not only from the character of the architecture, the depth of accumulation and the sheer volume of material finds, but also from the nature of the finds. Most of the imported and prestige objects, such as unique ceramic finds, basalt vessels and Egyptian flint tools, were recovered from this area or the adjacent Areas G and K; the archaeobotanical evidence also indicates that Area D served as a center for the collection of wheat and its redistribution (see AB II). Unfortunately, of the numerous architectural remains in Area D throughout Strata IV–II, few could be reconstructed with any certainty (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.18). In Stratum III, two structures (D4, D6) can be proposed as public buildings, and the massive size of enclosure W156, which began in Stratum IV and continued into Stratum III, also indicates a public function. Structures D4 and D6 were very large mudbrick buildings of irregular plan that underwent extensive architectural modifications in Phase IIIA. Structure D6 was the larger and more massive––one of its walls was 1.65 m wide. In Structure D4, a large concentration of Glycymeris shells was discovered (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.135). In Stratum II, the area produced numerous architectural remains, although most were incoherent. However, the discovery of a concentration of small votive ceramic vessels (see Chapter 3: Figs. 3.140, 3.141) serves to highlight the special nature of this area during Stratum II as well. Area G was apparently located on a higher elevation than its immediate surroundings in Areas K, D and E (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.24). Several buildings were uncovered in this area, all apparently built of mudbricks on stone foundations. Building G3, a rectilinear building with rounded corners, stands out due to its massive construction and large size (c. 7 × 14 m, inner floor space c. 72 sq m)––the largest single structure excavated at the site that can be reconstructed. Several other architectural features also set Building G3 off from the other structures at the site, including the narrow benches along its surviving western, southern and eastern walls, and a round mudbrick installation (diam. 1.6 m) inside the building near its western wall, which might have been an altar or a work platform (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.156).2 Another rounded, stone-built installation, perhaps of similar function, was found outside the building to its east (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.157).
Similar features were uncovered at Tel Lod, dated to late EB IB (Golani 2013: Fig. 5); at Eshta’ol, dated to EB IB (Ben-Ari and Golani, forthcoming); and at Qiryat Ata, dated to EB II (Assaf Kleinmann, pers. comm.). Much larger circular podiums are known from EB II at Tel Qishyon Stratum II (Arnon and Amiran 1993), and from EB III at Megiddo, Strata XIV–XVII (Loud 1948: Figs. 392–395) and Zeraqon (Genz 2002: Abb. 2). In most cases, these features were connected to architecture that may have been cultic, although at Eshtaʼol and Qiryat Ata, the area exposed was too small to draw substantive conclusions. 2
256
AMIR GOLANI
Building G3 was founded in Stratum IV and was the only building that underwent extensive architectural modifications during Stratum III, when an annex was appended to its eastern side and the round installations were covered by floors. Although the contents of Building G3 were unexceptional, a large fragment of a violin-shaped figurine was recovered from a Stratum IV surface to the south of the building (see Rosenberg, forthcoming), suggesting a possible cultic activity in this area. While these features are insufficient to identify Building G3 as a temple, they do attest to a building of some importance.3 In Area K, extensive remains were revealed in Strata III and II. Structure K4, a large rectilinear building with angled corners, was one of the most massive buildings at the site (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.93), and the only one that exhibited continuity from Stratum III into Stratum II. It was an architectural complex of unclear plan, built of stone foundations that probably carried a mudbrick superstructure, and it underwent extensive architectural modifications in Phase IIIA and in Stratum II. A small juglet containing a cache of dentalium shells was found in one of the outer building walls (W525) of Phase IIIA and is interpreted as a foundation deposit (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.97; see Ktalav, forthcoming). Pillar bases and several copper-smelting installations were also found in this structure during this phase. Together, these factors suggest that it was an unusual building of some importance. Storage Facilities At least 23 storage facilities from Strata IV–III were identified in nearly all the excavated areas––in open areas and also within compounds. As only a small portion of the site was excavated, it can be assumed that these were a common feature throughout the settlement. These facilities were generally circular installations, 2.0–7.3 m in diameter (Table 4.5), subterranean, semi-subterranean or above ground. Subterranean installations are termed silos, and semi-subterranean and above-ground installations are labeled granaries (after Borowski 1987:71–72). Early Bronze Age silos and granaries in the southern Levant were usually built of stone and mudbrick and probably lined with plaster (Golani and Yannai 2016). At Ashqelon Barne‘a, they were nearly always made of mudbrick, preserved up to only one or two rows, and plaster was identified in only one example (see below). Mudbrick walls of such facilities, if properly maintained, would have offered adequate insulation from both moisture and heat, creating a stable microclimate for the produce stored within. It may be assumed that these installations were intended for the storage of agricultural surplus, presumably in sacks, loose heaps, bins or storage jars (Golani and Yannai 2016). Archaeobotanical analysis of the remains retrieved from the bottom of some of these silos suggests that emmer wheat, barley, lentils, olives, grapes and figs were among these products (Weiss and Mahler-Slasky, forthcoming).
An EB IB rounded-corner building of similar size and orientation, also with a low bench along one of its walls, was excavated at Eshta’ol (Golani and Storchan 2008:7*, Fig. 2). This building may also have been a public structure, in comparison to the smaller, yet similarly built buildings at that site. 3
257
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
Table 4.5. Storage Facilities by Stratum Stratum
Area
Silo/ Granary
Wall
Loci Within
Within Compound/ Open Area
Floor
Type
Outer/Inner Diam. (m)*
Preserved Depth (m)
IV
A
Silo 156
W11
L156
Open area
-
Subterranean
3.0/2.1
1.77
IV
A
Silo 3095
W315
L3095
Open area
Beaten earth
Subterranean(?)
4.3/3.2 × 3.6/2.5
0.58
IV
G
Granary 865
W89
L865/874
Open area
Mudbrick fragments
Semisubterranean
3.0/2.3
0.80
IV
G
Silo 869
W103
L869/965, L841
Open area
Mudbrick fragments
Subterranean
2.7/1.8
1.13
IV
L
Silo(?) W635
W635
-
Compound
-
Unclear
2.0/1.0
-
IV– IIIB(?)
G
Granary 991
W91
L991
Compound
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean
4.3/2.7
0.59
IV–III
L
Granary 6079
W608
L6079/6132
Compound
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean(?)
3.2/2.2
0.63
III
A
Granary 141
W2
L141/148, L115
Compound
Mudbrick and stone
Semisubterranean
4.4/2.8
0.72
III(?)
D
Granary 511
W54
L511, L513
Open area(?)
Beaten earth
Above ground
3.2/2.4
0.22
III
M
Granary 7126
W713
L7126 (IIIB) L7120 (IIIA)
Open area
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean
2.4/2.0
0.72
IIIB
D
Granary 588
W160
L588, L1010/1019
Compound
Rough stone
Above ground
7.3/5.3
0.53
IIIB
G
Granary 833
W83
L833, L840
Open area
Mudbrick fragments
Above ground
2.7/1.8
0.25
IIIB
H
Granary 143
W10
L143/153
Open area
Beaten earth
Above ground(?)
5.0/4.0
0.56
IIIB
H
Silo 4124
W406
L4124, L4132
Compound
Beaten earth
Subterranean
2.8/2.0
1.30
IIIB
K
Granary 5026
W503
L5026
Compound
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean
2.3/1.75
1.26
IIIB(?)
K
Silo(?) 5057
-
L5057
Compound
-
Subterranean(?)
-
-
IIIB
M
Granary 7068
W710
L7068
Open area
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean
2.5/1.5
0.55
IIIA
D
Granary 1340
W131
L1340
Open area(?)
Mudbrick pavement
Above ground
2.4/2.0
0.33
IIIA
J
Granary 2007
W201
L2007
Open area(?)
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean
2.8/1.8
1.01
IIIA
J
Granary 2011
W202
L2011
Compound
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean
4.0/3.0
0.64
IIIA
J
Granary 2015
W203
L2015
Compound
Beaten earth
Above ground
3.5/2.7 × 3.2/2.4
0.63
IIIA
J
Granary 2018
W204
L2018
Compound
Beaten earth
Semisubterranean
2.1/1.7
0.59
IIIA
J
Granary 2030
W206
L2030
Compound
Beaten earth
Above ground
3.5/2.85
0.54
* All storage facilities are circular, except for 3095 and 2015.
258
AMIR GOLANI
Only three of these installations appear to have been completely subterranean, two Stratum IV silos from Areas A and G and a Phase IIIB silo from Area H, reaching depths of 1.13–1.77 m (Table 4.5). All three silos were formed by the excavation of a large, deep pit, after which a circular wall of one row of mudbricks was constructed within, and the area between the pit and the wall was filled in. Only in the Area A silo was a plaster lining identified on its interior; its sides sloped inward, creating a cup-like contour (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.1: Section 1-1). The inner contour of the other two silos was uncertain, but may have been similar to that in Area A. It could be determined with certainty that five of the granaries associated exclusively with Stratum III were constructed above ground and freestanding. These include a granary with a mudbrick pavement and another, much larger example (Building D8/Granary 588), both in Area D (see Chapter 3: Figs. 3.128, 3.129; Plan 3.20), circular and horseshoeshaped granaries in Area J (see Chapter 3: Figs. 3.196, 3.197; Plan 3.32), and one in Area G constructed directly on a Stratum IV subterranean silo (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.149; Plan 3.24: Section 5-5). A similar phenomenon was observed in Stratum IV in Area A, where a subterranean silo was replaced by a semi-subterranean granary in Stratum III (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.1; Plan 3.1: Sections 1-1, 2-2). The reason that a subterranean structure was directly replaced by an above-ground structure of similar function is probably connected with the mudbricks. With the denser, harder mudbrick material used in Stratum III (see above), less labor was required to construct a storage facility, as there would have been no need to dig a large pit. An identical phenomenon was noted at nearby Ashqelon Afridar, in Area J, where a Stratum VI silo built of dark gray bricks was replaced by an above-ground granary in Stratum V made of different mudbricks that included numerous calcite concretions (Baumgarten 2004: 161–163). The majority of the granaries, however, appear to have been partially sunken into the ground, and the superstructure was largely eroded. The above-ground walls were straight sided, and may have carried a domed, conical superstructure, similar to the reconstructed granaries at Bet Yeraḥ (Currid 1985).4 Only a few of these structures had openings in their walls, including a Stratum III granary in southern Area A, a large Stratum III granary in Area H and a Stratum III horseshoeshaped granary in Area J. In the first two granaries, the openings had been blocked in a later stage of use, perhaps indicating a change in storage method that necessitated access from the top of the domed roof. Circular structures of mudbrick or stone, often interpreted as storage facilities, are common at Early Bronze Age sites, especially those dating to the latter part of EB I, throughout the southern Levant (Golani and Yannai 2016). In EB IB Stratum II at Palmaḥim Quarry (Braun 1992), they were often found adjacent to or incorporated into walls, some
One of the EB IB circular structures excavated at Eshta’ol exhibited stone-built walls that sloped slightly inward (Golani and Storchan 2008:7*: Fig. 4), suggesting that some form of corbelling was employed to produce a dome-shaped structure. 4
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
259
of which may be interpreted as compound walls, as in Area J at Ashqelon Barne‘a (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.32). In all cases, these facilities are situated in proximity to domestic structures, implying the surplus storage of commodities by private households (Golani and Yannai 2016:33–34). During EB II–III, such circular storage structures adjacent to domestic buildings are generally unknown, although circular stone-built storage platforms are present, for example, at EB II ‘Arad (Amiran et al. 1978:17). Thus, these rounded storage structures appear to have been a phenomenon primarily of EB IB, as are rectilinear buildings with rounded corners (see above). At Ashqelon Barne‘a, circular storage facilities are situated in domestic compounds and thus have domestic associations. The large size of some of these facilities may be due to the volume or variety of the produce stored within, or may indicate the storage of surplus commodities. At Barne‘a, some facilities also stood in open areas, not directly associated with domestic structures, thus it is unclear if they belonged to individual households or perhaps represent communal or shared storage.
Settlement Planning The large-scale excavations at Ashqelon Barne‘a exposed almost 8 dunams of the Early Bronze Age occupation––approximately 15% of the entire site at its peak of 54 dunams in Stratum III. The scope of this exposure is nearly unprecedented in the archaeology of the Early Bronze Age in the southern Levant.5 The large number of architectural plans that are complete or can be reconstructed, and the broad lateral exposure that demonstrates their interrelationships, enables a comprehensive picture of settlement planning in this period. Compounds One of the most important results of the present excavations is the identification of planned compounds within the settlement, separated from one another by alleyways and open areas. Three types of compounds were defined: domestic, industrial and public. All feature a mudbrick enclosure wall, often on a partial stone foundation. These walls functioned as fencing or boundary walls, and presumably did not support roofing. Domestic Compounds At least eight domestic compounds were identified in Strata IV–III. They usually comprised three elements: an enclosure wall, a domestic structure and a storage facility. The manner in which these elements were arranged could vary, but in most cases the domestic
A much larger excavation at the site of ‘En Esur (‘Ein Asawir) in the northern part of the central coastal plain of Israel, has exposed some 6% of an EB I occupation estimated at 650 dunams (Elad and Paz 2018; Elad, Paz and Shalem 2019). 5
260
AMIR GOLANI
structure was attached to and inside the enclosure wall, although in Area A the structure was appended to the enclosure wall from the outside. Furthermore, not all the compounds included both storage structures and domestic buildings, and some enclosed a few small smelting installations. Following is a brief summary of the domestic compounds identified at the site. Stratum IV Only the domestic compound in Area L can be related to this stratum with certainty. It was bounded by a mudbrick enclosure wall on a partial stone foundation, which was traced for 29 m. The compound encompassed at least 400 sq m and included an elliptical domestic building (35 sq m) and two circular structures, one of them a granary (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.29). Stratum III Domestic compounds of Stratum III were exposed in Areas A, H, J, K and M. The compounds were bounded by stone and mudbrick walls, except for that in Area M, built only of mudbrick. Area A. A wall of varying width and partly built on a stone foundation enclosed a large rectangular courtyard (165 sq m) with rounded corners. A domestic structure (28 sq m), also with rounded corners (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.2), abutted the northern courtyard wall from the outside, and a granary abutted the southern inner wall. In its final stage of use, the courtyard had two entrances in the south—the main entrance opened onto a mudbrickpaved surface, and another into a corridor leading to the open courtyard. Area H. Part of an enclosure wall was traced for 20 m in the southern part of Area H (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.5), which enclosed a silo. Area J. Portions of two domestic compounds were exposed (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.32). The enclosure wall of the northern compound, which was partly built on a stone foundation and badly damaged, incorporated at least one granary. The enclosure wall of the southern compound, also built on a stone foundation, was traced for 18 m. Two granaries were incorporated into the wall and a third was inside the compound. Area K. Portions of two domestic compounds were uncovered, with an alleyway between them (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.16). The northern compound was delineated by an enclosure wall with rounded corners, partly built on a stone foundation. The compound was reconstructed as approximately 420 sq m, and included an elliptical domestic building (36 sq m), and a smaller elliptical structure (11.5 sq m) that could have been used for dwelling or storage. An entrance into this compound was identified near its southwestern corner. The enclosure wall of the southern compound was traced for 23 m with no stone foundation; the compound included at least one granary and traces of what may have been a dwelling unit.
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
261
Area M. A portion of an enclosure wall was traced for 18 m, but no structures could be identified inside this compound (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.10). The lack of industrial facilities or waste, and the relatively modest construction, suggest that this was a domestic rather than industrial or public compound (see below). Industrial Compounds for Metallurgical Activities During Stratum III at Ashqelon Barne‘a, copper processing appears to have become a major and well-organized industry, as witnessed by the numerous smelting installations found in nearly every excavation area and especially by the presence of at least three walled compounds that appear to have specialized in copper working. These compounds were incorporated within the settlement and situated alongside domestic compounds, suggesting that the copper-processing operations were under the control of individual families or groups of extended families working in a cooperative effort. Industrial compounds were identified in Stratum III, in Areas B, H and possibly Area I. Only in Area B was such a compound completely exposed (see Chapter 3: Plans 3.13, 3.14), while those identified in Areas H and I were only partially uncovered. These features are identified as industrial compounds primarily on the basis of the large amount of industrial waste and metallurgical installations found within and around their immediate vicinity. The plan of these compounds is irregular, yet they all appear to have been unroofed. The smelting installations found throughout Strata IV–II comprise small, shallow, cup-shaped pits, often lined with small stones and containing white-colored ash that originated from burnt plant matter. Surrounding these pits were large amounts of darkcolored burnt debris containing copper slags and prills and broken clay crucibles, as well as ashes and burnt mudbricks. While such metallurgical installations were not restricted to any specific zone, they were more concentrated in the industrial compounds. The metallurgical industry at Barne‘a apparently processed semi-refined copper into tools (Golani 2014) and bears witness to an organized network in which copper was mined and refined at distant locations and then transported over long distances to its final point of processing into tools and redistribution at Ashqelon. Area B. This compound was exposed in its entirety, revealing an enclosure wall on a partial stone foundation, encompassing an irregularly shaped area of 270 sq m (see Chapter 3: Plans 3.13, 3.14). The compound had three entrances––in the south, east and west. No domestic structures were identified, although the presence of a few curved mudbrick walls attest to some form of closed-off areas, possibly for storage or as windbreaks. Two such walls that could have functioned as windbreaks were built in the southern and eastern entrances. The western opening, however, was the focus of most of the metallurgical activity and appears to have been positioned in order to take advantage of the stoking draft from the sea, possibly enhanced by a dip in the kurkar ridge to the west. In and around this opening, large amounts of burnt mudbrick waste and dark ashes were found––clear evidence of pyrotechnical activities––along with slags and crucible fragments.
262
AMIR GOLANI
Area H. In southern Area H, the western side of a compound was exposed (Eastern Compound; see Chapter 3: Plan 3.5). The enclosure wall was built of mudbrick and stone and apparently had two rounded corners. Within the compound, two short walls were attached perpendicular to the western enclosure wall at regular intervals, creating three cells. Within one cell were the remains of at least one smelting installation. Large amounts of burnt mudbrick waste and ashes as well as slags and crucible fragments were found in the cells and other parts of the compound. Area I. A stone wall bounded a large courtyard of approximately 110 sq m, abutted by scanty remains of a smaller structure to its north (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.7). The courtyard had two entrances, one in the north and the other in the east. In the central portion of the courtyard was a smelting installation surrounded by a buildup of burnt mudbrick and ash. Public Compounds A large compound and architectural elements were found in Area D; their continuation may possibly be identified in Area G. The compound in Area D was initially constructed in Stratum IV, bounded by a 1 m wide enclosure wall on a stone foundation traced for 35 m in the southern portion of the area (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.19). A broad modern pipeline trench cut through this compound and its wall at both ends. The compound continued into Stratum III, when a considerable portion of the enclosure wall collapsed and a very large circular structure (Granary 588, diam. 7.3 m) was constructed on top of a previous structure (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.20). As the modern disturbance severed any possible ties between Areas D and G, it is unclear if the enclosure wall continued further south, where it may have linked up with Building G3 and the narrower enclosure wall in Area G, which was also constructed in Stratum IV and continued into Stratum III (see Figs. 4.1, 4.2). If this reconstruction of a large public compound is correct, then in Stratum IV it may have included the public (cultic?) Building G3, at least one curvilinear structure (Structure G4) and possibly two elliptical buildings (Buildings G1 and G2) and a granary (Granary 991). In Stratum III, in addition to the public (cultic?) building, at least one curvilinear structure (Structure G4) and possibly an elliptical building (Building G2), the compound also included two granaries. Open Areas Open areas between the compounds took the form of alleys as well as broad open spaces around which the compounds were positioned. The open areas occasionally included granaries, pits and wall fragments of unclear plan. Of special note is the large Stratum III granary in northern Area H (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.5), located midway between the domestic compound in southern Area A and the domestic and industrial compounds in southern Area H (see Fig. 4.2). To its west is the industrial compound in Area I and, adopting a principle of symmetry, another compound may have been located immediately to its east (and west
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
263
of the compound in Area L), so that this granary may have been positioned in the center of a large open area bounded by compounds. Another extensive open area in Stratum III may have existed between the industrial compound in southern Area H, the domestic compound in Area M to the west, the industrial compound in Area B to the south and the domestic buildings in Area L to its east (see Fig. 4.2). Burials Infant and child burials were common throughout Strata IV–II (see Nagar, forthcoming), with 29 such interments found in open areas or alleyways, yet never within compounds or other structures that were still in use, indicating a clear differentiation between burials and living areas. The burials were usually placed in jars with their tops cut off to facilitate insertion of the body, or encased in several large ceramic fragments in secondary use. In a few cases, they were placed in mudbrick cists or shallow pits. Most were found without any burial offerings, yet a few, such as Burials 5054 and 5063 in Area K, included a fish bone. No burials were found in Area D in any stratum, which further attests to the special, probably public significance attached to this area (see above). In Stratum II, infant and child burials were inserted into earlier habitation remains, as in the walls of the Stratum III industrial enclosure in Area B, or Burial 5053 immediately above the Stratum III Granary 5026 that had gone out of use. This practice implies that the inhabitants of Stratum II were aware of the earlier remains and purposely made use of them. Most of these Stratum II burials were concentrated in the southern portion of Area K and throughout Area B, both situated adjacent to what was apparently the heart of the Stratum II settlement in Area D (see Fig. 4.3). The practice of infant and child burial within the habitation area, and not within a specified burial ground outside the settlement, appears to be a ‘holdover’ from the previous Chalcolithic period, indicating a continuation of burial traditions from that period into EB I (Golani and Nagar 2011). Adult burials do appear to have been concentrated outside the settlement, beyond the southernmost extremity of the habitation represented by the sparse anthropogenic remains in northern Area E. The numerous stone cists found in southern Area E may have been intended for burial, although the present excavations were unable to determine with certainty if these features had actually contained burials or to what period they belonged. The cists in Area F, also situated at the periphery of the site, served as burial receptacles for secondary adult interments. Despite the lack of any diagnostic finds, the proximity of the burials in Areas E and F to the EB I site strongly suggests a connection between them (Golani and Nagar 2011).
Settlement Growth and Contraction The excavations have revealed a history of settlement growth from the foundation of the site in Stratum IV, its climax and subsequent abandonment during Stratum III, and a diminished resettlement in Stratum II.
264
AMIR GOLANI
Stratum IV (Fig. 4.1) This was the first clearly permanent occupation at the site, encompassing an area of some 23.5 dunams. The exposed remains demonstrate that walled compounds, buildings and storage facilities were already in existence at this time, although they appear to have been widely spaced. These include a domestic compound in Area L, building remains in Areas D, G, H, I and M, and a storage silo in southern Area A. The foundations of the large public compounds in Areas D and G in this stratum suggest that already in this stage the area was intended for public purposes. The lack of definite Stratum IV remains in Area K, where the Stratum III features were often founded atop the basal sand dune, suggest it was an open area at that time. To the north, Area J, positioned atop the kurkar ridge, was apparently not settled at that time and thus the northern boundary of the Stratum IV settlement is to be found in Areas I and A. Area G probably represents the southern limit of occupation at this time. Stratum III (Fig. 4.2) A smooth transition from Stratum IV to Stratum III was apparently accompanied by intensified building and rapid growth in settlement size, which now encompassed an area of about 54 dunams. In many cases, the Stratum III occupation completely replaced that of Stratum IV, often reusing the earlier Stratum IV walls. The Stratum III settlement was identified over most of the excavated site, arranged as loosely organized nucleations of walled compounds of different functions around open spaces, sometimes as clusters of compounds with alleyways between them. Metallurgical activities took place in certain industrial compounds, but also in open areas and in proximity to dwellings, and were not restricted to a specific zone. In Stratum III, public buildings were constructed in Areas D and K and the public (cultic?) building in Area G was enlarged. As in Stratum IV, Areas D and G were among the most intensively built-up parts of the site and retained their somewhat different character, which became even more pronounced in Stratum III. Stratum II (Fig. 4.3) The Stratum III site was abandoned, and then resettled during Stratum II on a smaller scale, reaching about 20 dunams in size. This may have been due to the much wetter climatic conditions that resulted in localized marshlands, rendering the coastal region less hospitable to settlement (see Chapter 2). The Stratum II occupation was scant and widely spaced compared to that of Stratum III, suggesting that at this stage it consisted of only a few scattered buildings. The most substantial Stratum II architecture was unearthed in Area D and the eastern portion of Area K, with limited remains in Areas A and L. Beyond these areas to the west, Stratum II consisted of a few beaten-earth surfaces and infant and child burials, the majority of which appear to have been located outside the Stratum II settlement. No remains of Stratum II were recognized in Area G, and the settlement appears to have shrunk toward the southeastern side of the site.
159 950
159 900
159 800
159 700
159 600 623 200
623 200
Area J Area C Area A
Byzantine remains
Area I
623 100
Domestic compound
Area H
623 100
Area L Area M
Area B Area F 623 000
Area K
Burial area
623 000
Area D
Area G
Public area
622 900
622 900
Area E Burial area? 622 800
622 800
Fig. 4.1. Reconstruction of the Stratum IV settlement.
159 950
159 900
159 800
50 m 159 700
159 600
0
Domestic compound
159 950
159 900
159 800
159 700
159 600 623 200
623 200
Domestic compound Area J
Area C
Domestic compound
Industrial compound Byzantine remains
Area A
Area I Domestic compound
623 100
Industrial compound
Domestic compound
Suggested compound Area L
Area H
Area M
623 100
Suggested compound Domestic compound
Area B Industrial compound
Area F 623 000
Burial area
Suggested compound
Area K Domestic compound
623 000
Area D
Area G
Public area
622 900
622 900
Area E Burial area? 622 800
622 800
Fig. 4.2. Reconstruction of the Stratum III settlement.
159 950
159 900
159 800
50 m 159 700
159 600
0
159 950
159 900
159 800
159 700
159 600 623 200
623 200
Area J
Area C Burial
Byzantine remains
Area A
Area I
623 100
623 100
Area H Area L Area M
Area B
Burial area
Area F 623 000
Area K
Burial area
623 000
Area D
Area G
Public area
622 900
622 900
Area E Burial area? 622 800
622 800
Fig. 4.3. Reconstruction of the Stratum II settlement.
159 950
159 900
159 800
50 m 159 700
159 600
0
268
AMIR GOLANI
Summary Taken together, the environmental (Chapters 1, 2), stratigraphic (Chapter 3) and architectural data appear to highlight a functional-spatial division within the settlement between public, domestic and industrial compounds and burial grounds. The core public area appears to have been located in the southeast, mainly in Area D and parts of Areas G and K, the only locales where public buildings were identified. Area G was apparently somewhat elevated, while Area D was completely devoid of burials and its public/cultic function is further attested by the nature of the architecture and many of the finds. Public architecture existed in Areas G and D during Strata IV–III, but it appears that a shift took place during Stratum II, when public architecture was found only in Areas D and K, probably due to the more constricted dimensions of the settlement at that time.
R eferences Amiran R., Paran U., Shiloh Y., Brown R., Tsafrir Y. and Ben-Tor A. 1978. Early Arad I: The Chalcolithic Settlement and the Early Bronze Age City I: First–Fifth Seasons of Excavations, 1962–1966 (Judean Desert Studies). Jerusalem. Arnon C. and Amiran R. 1993. Tel Kishion. NEAEHL 3. Pp. 873–874. Baumgarten Y.Y. 2004. An Excavation at Ashqelon Afridar—Area J. ‘Atiqot 45:161–184. Ben-Ari N. and Golani A. Forthcoming. Eshta’ol—Area K. HA–ESI. Borowski O. 1987. Agriculture in Iron Age Israel. Winona Lake. Braun E. 1989. The Problem of the Apsidal House: New Aspects of Early Bronze I Domestic Architecture in Israel, Jordan and Lebanon. PEQ 121:1–43. Braun E. 1992. Palmaḥim Quarry—1989/1990. ESI 10:21–23. Currid J.D. 1985. The Beehive Granaries of Ancient Palestine. ZDPV 101:97–110. Elad I. and Paz Y. 2018. ‘En Esur (Asawir), Preliminary Report. HA–ESI 130 (July 16). http://www. hadashot-esi.org.il/report_detail_eng.aspx?id=25453&mag_id=126 (accessed December 12, 2019) Elad I., Paz, Y. and Shalem D. 2019. ‘En Esur (Asawir), Area O. HA–ESI 131 (July 7). http://www. hadashot-esi.org.il/report_detail_eng.aspx?id=25576&mag_id=127 (accessed December 12, 2019) Genz H. 2002. Die frühbronzezeitliche Keramik von Ḥirbet ez-Zeraqōn: Mit Studien zur Chronologie und funktionalen Deutung frühbronzezeitlicher Keramik in der südlichen Levante (Abhandlungen des deutschen Palästina-Vereins 27, 2). Wiesbaden. Genz H. 2010. Thoughts on the Function of ‘Public Buildings’ in the Early Bronze Age Southern Levant. In D. Bolger and L.C. Maguire eds. The Development of Pre-State Communities in the Ancient Near East: Studies in Honour of Edgar Peltenburg (Themes from the Ancient Near East BANEA Publication Series 2). Oxford–Oakville. Pp. 46–52. Golani A. 1999. New Perspectives on Domestic Architecture and the Initial Stages of Urbanization in Canaan. Levant 31:123–133.
CHAPTER 4: ARCHITECTURE AND SETTLEMENT PLANNING
269
Golani A. 2003. Salvage Excavations at the Early Bronze Age Site of Qiryat Ata (IAA Reports 18). Jerusalem. Golani A. 2013. Lod, Remez Neighborhood. HA–ESI 125 (June 30) http://www hadashot-esi.org.il/ Report_Detail_Eng.aspx?id=2282&mag_id=120 (accessed March 21, 2016). Golani A. 2014. Ashqelon during the EB I Period––A Centre for Copper Processing and Trade. In A. Mączyńska ed. The Nile Delta as a Centre of Cultural Interactions between Upper Egypt and the Southern Levant in the 4th Millennium BC (Proceedings of the Conference Held in the Poznań Archaeological Museum, Poznań, Poland 21–22 June 2012) (Studies in African Archaeology 13). Poznan. Pp. 119–137. Golani A. and Nagar Y. 2011. Newly Discovered Burials of the Chalcolithic and the Early Bronze Age I in Southern Canaan—Evidence of Cultural Continuity? In J.L. Lovell and Y.M. Rowan eds. Culture Chronology and the Chalcolithic: Theory and Transition (Levant Suppl. S. 9). Oxford–Oakville. Pp. 84–96. Golani A. and Storchan D. 2008. Early Bronze Age and Intermediate Bronze Age Settlements at Eshtaʼol. In D. Amit and G.D. Stiebel eds. New Studies in the Archaeology of Jerusalem and Its Region, Collected Papers II. Jerusalem. Pp. 5*–14*. Golani A. and Yannai E. 2016. Storage Structures of the Late Early Bronze I in the Southern Levant and the Urbanisation Process. PEQ 148:8–41. Ktalav I. Forthcoming. The Mollusks. In AB II. Lass E.H.E. 2006. A Failed Innovation: Early Bronze Age Trapezoid Mud Bricks at Lod. In A.M. Maeir and P. de Miroschedji eds. “I Will Speak the Riddles of Ancient Times”: Archaeological and Historical Studies in Honor of Amihai Mazar on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday 1. Winona Lake. Pp. 49–54. Loud G. 1948. Megiddo II: Seasons of 1935–39 (OIP LXII) (2 vols.). Chicago. Milevski I., Bijovsky G., Sandhaus D., Krokhmalnik A. and Gorin–Rosen Y. 2018. A Byzantine Settlement on the Northernmost Kurkar Ridge of Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C Neighborhood. ‘Atiqot 91:159–192. Nagar Y. Forthcoming. Human Skeletal Remains and Mortuary Practices. In AB II. Porath Y. 1992. Domestic Architecture of the Chalcolithic Period. In A. Kempinski and R. Reich eds. The Architecture of Ancient Israel from the Prehistoric to the Persian Periods. Jerusalem. Pp. 40–48. Rosenberg D. Forthcoming. The Groundstone Assemblage. In AB II. Weiss E. and Mahler-Slasky Y. Forthcoming. The Archaeobotanical Remains. In AB II.
A. Golani, 2019, Ashqelon Barne a The Early Bronze Age Site I (IAA Reports 65)
Appendix 1
R adiocarbon Dating of Archaeobotanical Samples Elisabetta Boaretto
Ten charred samples from various areas and strata of the excavations at Ashqelon Barne‘a (see Chapter 3) were submitted for radiocarbon dating to the radiocarbon laboratory of the Weizmann Institute.1 Nine of the samples were charred olive stones and one was wood charcoal.
Sample Pre-Treatment and Preparation The samples were pre-treated to remove environmental contaminants according to the procedure presented in Boaretto et al. (2009). The samples were transformed in vacuum with copper oxide at 900º C into CO2 and then prepared as graphite for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry analysis. The stable carbon isotope ratio was determined to correct for the fractionation effect. Data concerning the samples and the radiocarbon results are presented in stratigraphic order from Stratum II to Stratum IV (Table App. 1.1). The 14C ages are reported in conventional radiocarbon years (before present = 1950) in accordance with international convention (Stuiver and Polach 1977). All calculated 14C ages have been corrected for fractionation to ensure that the results are equivalent with the standard δ13C value of –25‰ (wood). Calibrated ages in calendar years were obtained from the calibration tables in Reimer et al. (2013) by means of version OxCal v. 4.2.4 of Bronk Ramsey© version 2013 (Bronk Ramsey and Lee 2013).
R esults (Table App. 1.1; Fig. App. 1.1) During pre-treatment, all the samples indicated a good state of preservation. The percentage of material recovered after the pre-treatment procedure was between 45 and 55% by mass, and the carbon content was between 74 and 88% by mass. Only Sample RTT 5430 produced a very low percentage of recoverable material (11%) and its carbon content was also very low. Its state of preservation was particularly poor and its date should thus be regarded with caution. Sample RTT 5432 from L864 in Area G was found between two beaten-earth surfaces of Stratum III (L829 of Phase IIIA, L953 of Phase IIIB). It is interesting to note that Sample RTT 5432 is closer in age to samples
D-REAMS Dangoor Research Accelerator Mass Spectrometer, Scientific Archaeology Unit, Weizmann Institute of Science, Reḥovot, 7610001, Israel. 1
272
ELISABETTA BOARETTO
Table App. 1.1. Results of Radiocarbon Dating According to Stratum Sample No.
Provenance
Type
14
C Age ± 1σ Year BP
Calibrated Age
δ13C ‰ PDB
RTT 5437
Area D, L557, B5163; Stratum II surface
Olive stones
4300 + 75
68.2% probability 3090 (3.9%)–3060 BCE 3030 (61.0%)–2870 BCE 2810 (3.3%)–2770 BCE 95.4% probability 3320 (3.0%)–3230 BCE 3120 (76.4%)–2830 BCE 2820 (15.8%)–2660 BCE 2650 (0.3%)–2630 BCE
–21.4
RTT 5436
Area D, L530, B5061; Stratum II surface and surface make-up west of W50
Olive stones
4300 + 75
68.2% probability 3090 (3.9%)–3060 BCE 3030 (61.0%)–2870 BCE 2810 (3.3%)–2770 BCE 95.4% probability 3320 (3.0%)–3230 BCE 3120 (76.4%)–2830 BCE 2820 (15.8%)–2660 BCE 2650 (0.3%)–2630 BCE
–21.9
RTT 5434
Area A, L141, B1083; Stratum III floor in Granary 141
Olive stones
4335 + 75
68.2% probability 3090 (8.9%)–3050 BCE 3040 (59.3%)–2880 BCE 95.4% probability 3340 (9.1%)–3210 BCE 3190 (1.7%)–3150 BCE 3130 (81.3%)–2860 BCE 2810 (2.8%)–2750 BCE 2720 (0.4%)–2700 BCE
–22.2
RTT 5435
Area J, L2047, B20106; Phase IIIA surface make-up
Olive stones
4250 + 75
68.2% probability 2930 (30.8%)–2840 BCE 2820 (37.4%)–2670 BCE 95.4% probability 3090 (1.1%)–3060 BCE 3030 (94.2%)–2600 BCE
–23.3
RTT 5433
Area K, L5165, B50438; Phase IIIB surface
Olive stones
4315 + 75
68.2% probability 3090 (6.0%)–3060 BCE 3030 (62.2%)–2870 BCE 95.4% probability 3330 (5.8%)–3210 BCE 3180 (0.7%)–3150 BCE 3130 (79.7%)–2840 BCE 2820 (9.3%)–2670 BCE
–22.0
RTT 5432
Area G, L864, B8119; Phases IIIB floor in Building G1
Olive stones
4595 + 75
68.2% probability 3520 (25.1%)–3420 BCE 3410 (19.2%)–3320 BCE 3240 (24.0%)–3110 BCE 95.4% probability 3630 (3.2%)–3580 BCE 3540 (92.2%)–3090 BCE
–22.9
RTT 5428
Area B, L319, B2238; Stratum IV, basal dune
Lump of charcoal
4500 + 80
68.2% probability 3350 (68.2%)–3090 BCE 95.4% probability 3490 (1.2%)–3470 BCE 3380 (94.4%)–2920 BCE
–25.4
273
APPENDIX 1: RADIOCARBON DATING OF ARCHAEOBOTANICAL SAMPLES
Table App. 1.1 (cont.) Sample No.
Provenance
Type
14
C Age ± 1σ Year BP
Calibrated Age
δ13C ‰ PDB
RTT 5430
Area L, L6182, B60348; Stratum IV surface north of W620
Olive stones
4530 + 75
68.2% probability 3370 (27.0%)–3260 BCE 3250 (41.2%)–3100 BCE 95.4% probability 3510 (6.0%)–3430 BCE 3380 (87.6%)–3000 BCE 2990 (1.7%)–2930 BCE
–23.4
RTT 5431
Area G, L869, B8109; Stratum IV floor in Silo 869
Olive stones
4590 + 75
68.2% probability 3510 (21.9%)–3420 BCE 3380 (18.8%)–3320 BCE 3280 (0.7%)–3260 BCE 3240 (26.8%)–3110 BCE 95.4% probability 3630 (2.4%)–3590 BCE 3530 (92.5%)–3080 BCE 3050 (0.5%)–3030 BCE
–22.5
RTT 5429
Area M, L7076, B70288; Phase IVA surface associated with W707, W712 and W714
Olive stones
4775 + 85
68.2% probability 3650 (54.9%)–3500 BCE 3430 (13.3%)–3380 BCE 95.4% probability 3710 (95.4%)–3360 BCE
–23.1
Stratum II Area D RTT 5437 (4300 ± 75) Area D RTT 5436 (4300 ± 75) Stratum III Area A RTT 5434 (4335 ± 75) Phase IIIA Area J RTT 5435 (4250 ± 75) Phase IIIB Area K RTT 5433 (4315 ± 75) Area G RTT 5432 (4595 ± 75) Stratum IV Area B RTT 5428 (4500 ± 80) Area L RTT 5430 (4530 ± 75) Area G RTT 5431 (4590 ± 75) Phase IVA Area M RTT 5429 (4775 ± 85) Calibrated date (calBCE)
4000
3800
3600
3400
3200
3000
2800
2600
Fig. App. 1.1. Probability distribution of the calibrated ages of the samples (ordered according to strata, and in each stratum from earliest to latest).
2400
2200
274
ELISABETTA BOARETTO
from Stratum IV than those from Stratum III. A statistical analysis of the sequence of dates, imposing chronological boundaries between the strata, indicates that Sample RTT 5432 is an outlier in terms of stratigraphic association. This type of chronological discrepancy may suggest that the contents of the fill in L864, B8119, may have been residual from Stratum IV.
R eferences Boaretto E., Wu X., Yuan J., Bar-Yosef O., Chu V., Pan Y., Liu K., Cohen D., Jiao, T., Li S., Gu H., Goldberg P. and Weiner S. 2009. Radiocarbon Dating of Charcoal and Bone Collagen Associated with the Early Pottery at Yuchanyan Cave, Hunan Province, China. Proceedings of National Academy of Science 106(24):9595–9600. Ramsey C.B. and Lee S. 2013. Recent and Planned Developments of the Program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55(2):720–730. Reimer P.J., Bard E., Bayliss A., Beck J.W., Blackwell P.G., Bronk Ramsey C., Buck C.E., Cheng H., Edwards R.L., Friedrich M., Grootes M.G., Guilderson T.P., Haflidason H., Hajdas I., Hatté C., Heaton T.J., Hoffmann D.L., Hogg A.G., Hughen K.A., Kaiser K.F., Kromer B., Manning S.W., Niu M., Reimer R.W., Richards D.A., Scott E.M., Southon J.R., Staff R.A., Turney C.S.M. and van der Plicht J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887. Stuiver M. and Polach H.A. 1977. Discussion: Reporting of 14C Data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.
A. Golani, 2019, Ashqelon Barne a The Early Bronze Age Site I (IAA Reports 65)
A ppendix 2
Stratum I: Byzantine R emains
Introduction Amir Golani Remains of the Byzantine period (Stratum I) were revealed primarily in Area C, located atop the kurkar ridge and on its western slope, and consisted of several poorly preserved domestic structures of unclear plan. In addition, sporadic remains of the Byzantine period were encountered throughout most of the excavated area during topsoil removal. These included various pits in Areas D, G and H (see Chapter 3: Plans 3.1, 3.6) and the remains of a partially exposed well in Area D that was constructed of dressed kurkar stones (see Chapter 3: Plan 3.23; Fig. 3.143). Mechanical removal of the overlying sand dunes and leveling operations during development work appear to have destroyed any other remains of the Byzantine period at the site prior to excavation. In 2003, an excavation carried out by the IAA exposed Byzantine remains atop the kurkar ridge to the southwest of the present site and two cist tombs near the coastline (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3; Milevski et al. 2018). The architecture revealed in this excavation is similar to that in Area C and appears to belong to the same occupation. This appendix presents the Byzantine architectural remains exposed in Area C and other Stratum I finds at the site, which include ceramics, coins and a complete ring with an inscription.1
Area C (Plan App. 2.1) Amir Golani Area C was positioned to the west and outside the limits of the Early Bronze settlement (see Chapter 1: Fig. 1.3). Prior to excavation, mechanical trenching on the ridge had determined the northwestern boundary of the Early Bronze settlement and the extent of the previously recognized Byzantine occupation farther to the south.
A few poorly preserved glass fragments of greenish and greenish-blue color, representing well-known and common blown tableware from the Roman and Byzantine periods (second–sixth centuries CE), were also recovered from Area C; they were identified by Natalya Katsnelson of the IAA. In addition, a small fragment of a Late Roman mosaic glass inlay was found in a disturbed context in Area A (L3033), a common find in Egypt, but locally rare. 1
276
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
Two clusters of excavation squares (north and south) were positioned upon the ridge, where quantities of Byzantine potsherds and a few stones were apparent on the modern-day surface. The excavations exposed poorly preserved and disjointed architectural remains of a single Byzantine occupation horizon founded on sterile sand. In the northern portion of the excavated area (Sqs D4, E4–5), the sand cover was removed, revealing evidence of large-scale bulldozer damage. Nevertheless, a few remains were salvageable, although none of these formed a coherent plan. Two walls (W46, W43) and associated surfaces were uncovered in Sq E5. Wall 46, oriented north–south and exposed to a length of c. 1.5 m, was built of two rows of small kurkar stones with smaller chinking stones preserved up to one course. No continuation of this wall was found to the north, yet to the south, it appears to have connected at a right angle with W43. This latter wall was very poorly preserved and was attested only
C
D
E L422 L432
27.95
W42
4 27.83 27.77
4
L429 L431
27.93
L436
5
L424 27.94
27.95 27.91
W46
27.83 27.78 27.85 27.72
27.94 27.90
W43
5
L417 L440 28.22 28.00
27.85 27.74
28.00
6
6
7
7 L435 27.24
26.94 26.87 27.08 27.01
L407 W41 26.81 L439
8
27.07
27.20 27.14
L415 L423
27.40 27.58
L410 L414 L416 27.53
27.61 W44 27.64 27.58 L418 27.57
L443
5 m
0
C
D
Plan App. 2.1. Area C.
27.49
E
W49
W45
27.37 27.28
8
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
277
by the presence of a few stones and the remains of a compacted gray fill with plaster and numerous crushed shells that was interpreted as a robber trench, or perhaps a base for a wall foundation that did not survive. To the south of this wall were remains of a beaten-earth surface (L417/440). North of W43 and west of W46, the remains of a similar beaten-earth surface were identified (L424). This habitation level continued to the north (Sq E5) as a pavement of kurkar and beachrock (L436) and a gray, compacted beaten-earth surface (L422/432, L429/431). A robber trench (W42) full of compacted gray-brown earth with numerous crushed shells was exposed in the adjoining square (D4) to the west; no surface was identified in that square. The second cluster of excavation squares (D7–8, E8) was positioned 10 m to the south, where remains of several walls were uncovered. Wall 44, oriented east–west and exposed to a length of 1.5 m, was built of small to medium-sized kurkar and beachrock stones arranged in two rows (Fig. App. 2.1). This wall was poorly preserved and only a few stones hint at a western extension that may have continued as W41 (Sq D8; see below). To the east, W44 connected at a right angle to W49, the latter consisting of a compacted, light brown earth fill, apparently the remains of a robber trench. South of W44 was a beaten-earth surface (L418/443), and to its north a similar one (L410/414). A limited probe beneath the latter elements (L416) showed them to have been founded directly upon the sterile sands. Wall 41 consisted of a cluster of medium-sized kurkar and beachrock stones, the western continuation of which was cut. To its north, W45 was appended, built of small stones. North of this wall, the excavation exposed the outline of several upright ceramic vessels (Fig. App. 2.2) within a densely compacted, dark-colored matrix (L435); no
Fig. App. 2.1. Wall 44, looking west.
Fig. App. 2.2. Wall 45, looking south.
278
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
surface level was reached in this area. South of W41 was a beaten-earth surface (L407/439, L415/423) upon which were numerous storage-jar fragments. The remains in Area C, although disjointed and limited in nature, indicate the presence of one occupation stratum during the Byzantine period in this area, comprising at least two structures built on sterile sand. These structures appear to have been a continuation of those revealed in previous excavations nearby and identified as domestic buildings (Milevski et al. 2018:186, Plan 1). No evidence was discerned of activity in Area C during the Early Bronze Age, attesting that the EB I settlement did not extend onto the western slope of the kurkar ridge.
The Pottery Amir Golani The Byzantine ceramics presented here consist of bowls and a basin, storage jars, a juglet and a decorated sherd of an unidentified vessel (Figs. App. 2.3, 2.4).2 They were retrieved from surfaces and a surface make-up in Area C (L407, L410, L432), from a fill within the well in Area D (L526), from mixed debris in Area J (L2093), and from a pit in Area H (L3120). An intrusive fragment was recovered in an EB I stratum (L822) in Area G. Bowls and Basin (Fig. App. 2.3). The most common bowl types are of Late Roman C Ware (LRC), including Form 1A (Fig. App. 2.3:2, 3) dated to the late fourth–early fifth centuries CE (Hayes 1972:325, 327, Fig. 65:2); Form 8 (Fig. App. 2.3:4) dated to the second half of the fifth century CE (Hayes 1972:324, Fig. 70:1); and Form 3F (Fig. App. 2.3:5, 6) dated from the second quarter to the mid-sixth century CE (Hayes 1972:331–335, 338, Fig. 69:17, 19, 23). These types were frequent finds at other excavations in the Ashqelon region (Nahshoni 1999:103*, Fig. 5:7; Milevski el al. 2018: Fig. 14:1, 2). A fragment of LRC Ware, decorated with an impressed double-outlined cross (Fig. App. 2.3:7), is dated to the late fifth–early sixth centuries CE (Hayes 1972:365–367, Fig. 79:71a–d). Two Fine Byzantine Ware (FBW) bowls include one of Form 1B (Fig. App. 2.3:8), dated to the mid-sixth–late seventh/early eighth centuries CE (Magness 1993:193–195), and one of Form 2C (Fig. App. 2.3:9), dated to the mid-seventh–late ninth/tenth centuries CE (Magness 1993:198–200; Nahshoni 1999:103*, 106*, Fig. 5:1, 2). A fragment of a basin decorated with straight and wavy incised lines (Fig. App. 2.3:10) is typical of the Byzantine period in the coastal region (Israel and Erickson-Gini 2013:206–208, Fig. 35:5, 6). It resembles Magnessʼ arched-rim basins, which were common in the Jerusalem region (Magness 1993:206–207, Form 2A). Storage Jars (Fig. App. 2.4:1–6). The most common storage jars are Gaza jars (Fig. App. 2.4:1–5), which were widespread throughout the Mediterranean basin from the first to the
2
I would like to thank Itamar Taxel and Shoshana Israeli for their constructive comments.
279
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
seventh centuries CE (Majcherek 1995:165; for a typology, see Oked 2001). Studies have shown these jars were manufactured in the region of Ashqelon and Gaza (Israel 2001:223) and Ashdod (Baumgarten 2000). The most complete example (Fig. App. 2.4:1) originates from a pit in Area H (L3120) that was full of such jars (see Chapter 3: Fig. 3.39). It is similar to Majcherek’s Form 4 and Oked’s Type 7 (Majcherek 1995:169, Pls. 3:4; 4; Oked 2001:233, Pl. 1). This type first appeared in the late sixth century CE and became very common during the seventh century CE. Juglet (Fig. App. 2.4:7). This fragment may belong to a FBW juglet of Magness’ Form 2A, dated to the mid-sixth–early eighth centuries CE (Magness 1993:239–240; Israel and Erickson-Gini 2013:209–210, Fig. 36:3).
1
2
3
5
4
6 7 0
8
9
10 0
10
Fig. App. 2.3.
2
280
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
In summary, the pottery presented above dates to the fifth–seven centuries CE and resembles types recovered from the nearby excavation of a Byzantine occupation, dated from the mid-fifth to early seventh centuries CE (Milevski et al. 2018:160, 185). The Byzantine remains from the present excavation are apparently to be associated with the northern part of Ashqelon during the Byzantine period, known as Ascalon Maiumas (Bagatti 1974).
2
3
4
1
5 6
7
8 0
0
10
Fig. App. 2.4.
2
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
281
The Coins Gabriela Bijovsky Five coins, all dated to the Byzantine period, were discovered during the present excavations on the modern-day surface or in disturbed loci. Additional Byzantine coins, including a hoard of seven gold coins, were discovered nearby (Bijovsky, Sandhaus and Milevski 2014; Milevski et al. 2018:176–180, Fig. 17, Tables 2, 3). Catalogue 1. Surface, Area G, IAA 140169 378–383 CE Obv: Obliterated Rev: Vota type (uncertain) within wreath. Mintmark illegible Æ, 1.22 g, 13 mm Cf. LRBC 2:101, Nos. 2729–2736 2. Reg. No. 6090, L650, Area E, IAA 140171 Imitative issue, first half of fifth century CE Obv: Bust r Rev: Cross within border of dots Æ, 0.18 g, 6 mm Bijovsky 2000–2002:199 3. Reg. No. 6103, L646, Area E, IAA 140170 Anastasius I, 491–518 CE, Constantinople Obv: Obliterated Rev: Monogram Æ, nummus, 0.43 g, 8 mm, MIBE:90, No. 40. 4. Reg. No. 6090, L650, Area E, IAA 140172 Blank flan, c. 450–550 CE Obv: Bust r Rev: Cross within border of dots Æ, 0.18 g, 6 mm Bijovsky 2000–2002:202, No. 5
282
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
5. Reg. No. 4041, L412, Area C, IAA 113554 Phocas, 603–610 CE, Constantinople Obv: dN FOC[AS PERP AVC] Bust facing in consular dress, holding mappa and cross on globe Undertype: K to l. ANN; above cross Rev: XX above star; in exergue: CON Undertype: bust facing Æ, half follis, ↑, 5.58 g, 21–26 mm, Overstruck on half follis of Maurice DOC 2/1:168, No. 37a.3
0
1
A Bronze R ing (Fig. App. 2.5) Eriola Jakoel A complete and well-preserved bronze ring was recovered in debris on a Phase IIIA surface (L2032) in Area J. The ring has a thin round shank (diam. 2.1 cm) to which an oval bezel (1.3 × 1.5 cm), weighing 2.34 g (after cleaning), is attached. The ring is clearly intrusive, although it is unclear how it arrived there. A Greek inscription incised in relief on the ring’s bezel comprises three lines, designed to conform to the size of the bezel. The inscription reads: ΥΓΙΑ ΘΕΩΔΟΡΟΥ, with ΥΓΙΑ in the uppermost register, ΘΕΩΔ in the middle register and ΟΡΟΥ in the lowermost register. It can be translated as ‘Health (to) Theodorosʼ. The formula ΥΓΙΑ is frequently found on similar rings (Dalton 1912: Nos. 69, 70), which bear inscriptions stating ‘health to (personal name) ʼ. They are quite common in Late Antiquity, dated to the fifth–seventh centuries CE, and have been found, for example, at Masada and Apollonia (Cotton and Geiger 1995:52–54) and other sites in the Levant (Rahmani 1985:178–179, Nos. 16, 17; Pl. 43:16, 17, and further references therein). 0
1
Fig. App. 2.5.
APPENDIX 2: STRATUM I: BYZANTINE REMAINS
283
R eferences Bagatti B. 1974. Ascalon e Maiuma di Ascalon nel VI secolo. LA 24:227–264. Baumgarten Y.Y. 2000. Evidence of a Pottery Workshop of the Byzantine Period at the Foot of Tel Ashdod (‘Ad Halom Site). ‘Atiqot 39:69*–74* (Hebrew; English summary, p. 201). Bijovsky G. 2000–2002. The Currency of the Fifth Century C.E. in Palestine—Some Reflections in Light of the Numismatic Evidence. INJ 14:196–210. Bijovsky G., Sandhaus D. and Milevski I. 2014. A Byzantine Hoard of Gold Coins from Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C Neighborhood. INR 9:193–211. Cotton H.M. and Geiger J. 1995. A Greek Inscribed Ring from Masada. IEJ 45:52–54. Dalton O.M. 1912. Catalogue of the Finger Rings, Early Christian, Byzantine, Teutonic, Mediaeval and Later. London. DOC 2/1: P. Grierson. Catalogue of the Byzantine Coins in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection and in the Whittemore Collection 2/1: Phocas and Heraclius (602–641). Washington, D.C. 1968. Hayes J.W. 1972. Late Roman Pottery. London. Israel Y. 2001. The Economy of the Gaza–Ashkelon Region in the Byzantine Period in Light of the Archaeological Survey and Excavations of the ‘Third-Mile Estateʼ near Ashkelon. In A. Sasson, Z. Safrai and N. Sagiv eds. Ashkelon: A City on the Seashore. Ashqelon. Pp. 213–226 (Hebrew). Israel Y. and Erickson-Gini T. 2013. Remains from the Hellenistic through the Byzantine Periods at the ‘Third Mile Estate’, Ashqelon. ‘Atiqot 74:167–222. LRBC 2: R.A.G. Carson and J.P.C. Kent. Bronze Roman Imperial Coinage of the Later Empire, A.D. 346–498. In Late Roman Bronze Coinage A.D. 324–498. London 1965. Pp. 41–114. Magness J. 1993. Jerusalem Ceramic Chronology: Circa 200–800 CE (JSOT/ASOR Monograph Series 9). Sheffield. Majcherek G. 1995. Gaza Amphorae: Typology Reconsidered. In H. Meyza and J. Młynarczyk eds. Hellenistic and Roman Pottery in the Eastern Mediterranean— Advances in Scientific Studies (Acts of the II Nieborów Pottery Workshop; Nieborów, 18–20 December 1993). Warsaw. Pp. 163–178. MIBE: W. Hahn. Money of the Incipient Byzantine Empire (Anastasius I–Justinian I, 491–565) (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte der Universität Wien 6). Vienna 2000. Milevski I., Bijovsky G., Sandhaus D., Krokhmalnik A. and Gorin–Rosen Y. 2018. A Byzantine Settlement on the Northernmost Kurkar Ridge of Ashqelon, Barne‘a B–C Neighborhood. ‘Atiqot 91:159–192. Nahshoni P. 1999. A Byzantine Site in the Migdal Neighborhood, Ashqelon. ‘Atiqot 38:99*–111* (Hebrew; English summary, p. 229). Oked S.H. 2001. “Gaza Jar”: A Chronicle, and Economic Overview. In A. Sasson, Z. Safrai and N. Sagiv eds. Ashkelon: A City on the Seashore. Ashqelon. Pp. 227–250 (Hebrew; English summary, pp. XIII–XIV). Rahmani L.Y. 1985. On some Byzantine Brass Rings in the State Collections. ‘Atiqot (ES) 17:168– 181.
A. Golani, 2019, Ashqelon Barne a The Early Bronze Age Site I (IAA Reports 65)
Appendix 3
Locus and Wall Lists by Area
Locus List Area A Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
100
B27
-
Topsoil removal
-
101
B28
-
Topsoil removal
-
102
C27
-
Topsoil removal
-
103
C28
-
Topsoil removal
-
104
E33
-
Topsoil removal
-
105
E34
-
Topsoil removal
-
106
E35
-
Topsoil removal
-
107
B27
100
Debris below topsoil
III–II
108
B28
101
Surface east of W7
III
109
C27
102
Debris below topsoil
III–II
110
C28
103
Debris above surface
III(?)
111
E33
104
Debris below topsoil east of W1
III(?)
112
E33
104
Debris below topsoil west of W1
III(?)
113
E33
104
Topsoil intrusion
I(?)
114
E35
106
Basal dune
-
115
B27
107
Debris above floor within Granary 141
III(?)
116
B27
107
Surface between W7 and Granary 141
III
117
B28
108
Surface make-up
III
118
C27
109
Debris above surface and mudbrick pavement
III(?)
119
C28
110
Combined into L110
III(?)
120
E32
-
Topsoil removal
-
121
E33–34
-
Topsoil removal; exposure of W5
III–I
122
C27
109
Combined into L141
III
123
C27–28
-
Topsoil removal and debris below topsoil
III–I
124
E34
105
Topsoil intrusion
I(?)
125
D22
-
Topsoil removal and surface; in Northern Area H
II(?)
126
C16
-
Combined into L4105; in Southern Area H
-
127
C27–28
123
Combined into L141
III
128
C27
118, 123
Mudbrick pavement north of W6
III
129
B–C27
-
Combined into L102
-
130
B–C27
129
Surface south of W6
III
131
E33–34
-
Topsoil removal; exposure of W5
III–I
132
B27
116
Surface and surface make-up between W7 and Granary 141
III
286
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
133
B–C27
129
Combined into L122
III
134
C27
118
Combined into L130
III
135
B–C28
-
Topsoil removal
-
136
C16
128
Combined into L4150; in Southern Area H
-
137
B/C28
135
Combined into L117
III
138
E34
105
Combined into L124
I(?)
139
C28
110, 135
Surface; equals L3027
III
140
D22
125
Surface and surface make-up in Granary 143; in Northern Area H
IIIA
141
B27
115, 122, 133
Mudbrick and stone floor of Granary 141
III
142
E32
120
Debris below topsoil
III(?)
143
D22
140
Surface within Granary 143; in Northern Area H
IIIB
144
B43
-
Topsoil removal
-
145
C16
136
Surface north of W410; in Southern Area H
IIIB
146
C28
119, 139
Debris below surface and exposure of light brown matrix
IV–III
147
B43
144
Sterile marl
-
148
B–C27
141
Dismantlement of the mudbrick floor in Granary 141
III
149
C16
145
Surface make-up; in Southern Area H
IIIB
150
B27
148
Light brown loose sand of basal dune
-
151
B27
148
Fill of foundation trench outside Silo 156 and section into wall
IV
152A
C27
119
Combined into L156
IV–III
152B
C27
152A
Debris east of Silo 156
IV
153
D22
143
Floor make-up within Granary 143; in Northern Area H
IIIB
154
C27
128
Dismantlement of the mudbrick pavement
III
155
C27
148
Fill within foundation trench outside Silo 156; equals L151
IV
156
C27
148
Debris within Silo 156
IV
157
B–C27
130
Surface make-up
III
3001
B29
-
Topsoil removal
-
3002
C29
-
Topsoil removal
-
3003
D29
-
Topsoil removal
-
3004
D27
-
Topsoil removal
-
3005
D28
-
Topsoil removal
-
3006
C30
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
-
3007
D29
3003
Debris south of W303
II
3008
D29
3003
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
-
3009
D29
3003
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
-
3010
D29
3003
Floor within Structure A2
III
3011
B30
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
-
3012
D29
3003
Debris between W301 and W303
III–II
3013
D27
3004
Combined into L3016
III
3014
B29
3001
Surface with topsoil intrusion; surface equals L3027
III
3015
D28
3005
Surface; equals L3027
III
287
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
3016
D27
3013
Mudbrick pavement north of W302
III
3017
D29
3010, 3008
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
III–I
3018
D27
3013
Surface(?) adjacent and to south of W302
III
3019
C29
3002
Mixed debris below topsoil
II–III
3020
D27
3016
Probe down to basal dune
IV–III
3021
D29
3017
Probe into debris down to basal dune
IV–III
3022
D29
3007
Stone pavement south of W303
II
3023
E27
-
Topsoil removal
-
3024
E29
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II–I
3025
C/D30
-
Topsoil removal in balk
-
3026
D28
3015
Surface make-up
III
3027
D27
3016
Surface and surface make-up east of W306; equals L3016
III
3028
D30
-
Mixed debris below topsoil
III(?)
3029
C29
-
Surface south of W317; equals L3027
III
3030
E29
3024
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
III–I
3031
-
-
Unused locus number
-
3032
E28
-
Topsoil removal
-
3033
E29
3030, 3024
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
III–I
3034
D31
-
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
III–I
3035
C30
3006
Surface west of W304
III
3036
D28
3026
Surface south of Silo 3095
IV
3037
D31
3034
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
III–I
3038
D27
3016
Combined into L3027
III
3039
B26
-
Topsoil removal; in Northern Area H
-
3040
E27
3023
Surface
II
3041
E29
3024
Surface east of W305
III
3042
E27
3016
Combined into L3040
II
3043
E29
3024
Surface north of W310; equals L3027
III
3044
D26
-
Topsoil removal; in Northern Area H
-
3045
C30
3035
Probe below surface down to basal dune
IV–III
3046
E26
-
Topsoil removal; in Northern Area H
-
3047
D27
3020
Probe into debris
IV(?)
3048
B26
3039
Surface(?); in Northern Area H
II(?)
3049
E28
3032
Mixed debris below topsoil
II(?)
3050
C30
3045
Combined into L3045
IV–III
3051
C26
-
Topsoil removal; in Northern Area H
-
3052
D27
3047
Probe into dune
V(?)
3053
E28
3049
Combined into L3081
III
3054
E28
3049
Combined into L3068
III
3055
C29
3029
Combined into L3029
III
3056
D25
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris; in Northern Area H
-
3057
E27
3040
Surface west of W310; equals L3027
III
3058
B26
3039, 3048
Surface make-up; in Northern Area H
III–II
288
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
3059
C26
3051
Surface east of W311; in Northern Area H
III
3060
C26
3051
Combined into L3059; in Northern Area H
IIIB
3061
D26
3044
Debris above surface; in Northern Area H
III(?)
3062
E29
3041, 3043, 3033
Surface east of W310
III
3063
E27
3040
Surface east of W 310
III
3064
D29
3021
Combined into L3021
IV–III
3065
E26
3046
Surface south of W313; in Northern Area H
III
3066
D28
3036
Combined into L3036
IV
3067
D28
3036
Combined into L3036
IV
3068
E28
3054
Surface east of W310
III
3069
E26
3046
Mudbrick debris below topsoil; in Northern Area H
III(?)
3070
E27
3063
Surface make-up
III
3071
E26
3061
Surface and surface make-up west of W313; in Northern Area H
III
3072
D–E29
-
Balk removal
-
3073
C26
-
Surface east of W311; in Northern Area H
III
3074
C25
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris; in Northern Area H
-
3075
E27
3057
Combined into L3057
III
3076
D26
3061
Surface; in Northern Area H
IV
3077
D28
-
Combined into L3036.
IV
3078
E27
3070
Surface make-up and probe down to basal dune
IV–III
3079
C26
3073
Surface make-up; in Northern Area H
III
3080
C29
3055
Combined into L3029
III
3081
E28
3054
Surface west of W310; equals L3027
III
3082
D28–29
-
Balk removal
III(?)
3083
C30
3045
Infant burial
II(?)
3084
D28
3077
Combined into L3036
IV
3085
C29
3019
Surface to north of W317
III
3086
D28
3077
Combined into L3036
IV
3087
D26
3076
Surface make-up; in Northern Area H
IV
3088
D26
3087
Combined into L3087; in Northern Area H
IV
3089
E27
3057
Surface make-up
III
3090
D26
3087
Combined into L3087; in Northern Area H
IV
3091
B26
3058
Surface with small stones; in Northern Area H
III
3092
B25
-
Topsoil removal and surface(?); in Northern Area H
III(?)
3093
C26
3087
Surface; in Northern Area H
IV
3094
D28
-
Combined into L3036
IV
3095
D28
3084, 3086
Floor within Silo 3095
IV
3096
E26
3078
Surface(?); in Northern Area H
IV
3097
E28
3081
Debris below surface
IV(?)
3098
C26
3076
Surface and surface make-up; in Northern Area H
IV
3099
D26
3090
Probe into basal dune below surface; in Northern Area H
IV
3100
E26
3096
Surface make-up; in Northern Area H
IV
3101
E28
3097
Surface and surface make-up
IV
289
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
3102
-
-
Unused locus number
-
3103
D25
3056
Surface(?) on basal dune(?); in Northern Area H
IV
3104
B26
3091
Combined into L3091; in Northern Area H
III(?)
3105
D28
3095
Combined into L3095
IV
3106
E26
3100
Probe into basal dune; in Northern Area H
-
3107
E28
3068
Surface; equals L3101
IV
3108
C25
3074
Surface; in Northern Area H
IV
3109
B25
3092
Probe down to basal dune; in Northern Area H
IV–III
3110
D25
3056
Surface(?) basal dune; in Northern Area H
IV
3111
D29
3012
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
I)?(
3112
B26
3104
Surface make-up; in Northern Area H
III
3113
E28
3101
Combined into L3101
IV
3114
B26
3112
Surface and surface make-up; in Northern Area H
IV
3115
C25
3108
Surface make-up; in Northern Area H
IV
3116
E28
3113
Combined into L3101
IV
3117
B25
-
Balk removal with mixed debris; in Northern Area H
-
3118
D29
3111
Debris next to W322 and below
V–IV
3119
B26
3091
Combined into L3112; in Northern Area H
III
3120
B26
3119
Debris within pit; in Northern Area H
I
3121
B25
3092
Floor within Building H1; in Northern Area H
IV
3122
B25
3092
Debris above surface north of W323; in Northern Area H
IV
3123
B25
3117
Debris within pit; in Northern Area H
II(?)
3124
D26
3099
Combined into L3099; in Northern Area H
IV
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
217
D6
205
Surface north of W20
IIIB
218
D6
217
Surface east of W23 and W24; equals L7094 in Area M
IV
219
C5
200
Surface make-up
IIIA
220
C4
-
Topsoil removal and debris of ash and burnt mudbrick west of W31
IIIA
221
B9
-
Surface; in Area M
IIIA
222
E6
214B
Surface make-up
IV
223
C5
219
Debris above habitational surface west of W20
IIIB
224
E6
202
Surface north of W21
IIIB
225
F6
-
Topsoil removal and surface with mudbrick collapse east of W28
III
226
D12
216
Debris of habitational level with decayed mudbrick; in Area M
IIIB(?)
227
E6
206, 224
Surface south of W29
IV
228
B9
-
Topsoil removal and surface within apse of W25; in Area M
IIIA
229
C5
223
Surface with decayed mudbrick west of W20
IIIB
230
C5
223
Surface west of W26 and W27
IIIB
231
E6
208
Surface south of W21
IIIA
Area B
290
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
232A
F5
-
Topsoil removal and surface with mudbrick debris west of W28
IIIA
232B
F5
232A
Surface west of W28
IIIB
233A
F6
-
Topsoil removal and surface with mudbrick debris west of W28
IIIA
233B
F6
233A
Surface west of W28
IIIB
234
C4
220
Surface with ash and burnt mudbrick west of W31
IIIA
235
B9
221
Surface below base of W25; in Area M
IIIB
236
C5
230
Surface with much ash east of W27
IIIB
237
C5
229
Surface make-up
IIIB
238
D12
226
Laminated debris of habitation level on basal dune; in Area M
IV(?)
239A
C4
220
Combined into L234
IIIA
239B
C4
239A, W31
Surface with ash
IIIB
240A
F6
225
Combined into L249
IV
240B
F6
240A
Basal dune
V
241
C5
236, W27
Debris within pit
IV
242
F5
-
Topsoil removal and debris east of W28
-
243
B9
235
Debris of dark ash and laminations of habitation level; in Area M
IV–IIIB
244
D5
209
Surface east of W20 and W40
IIIB
245
C4
234, W31
Surface with ash and burnt mudbrick
IIIB
246
D2
-
Topsoil removal around W30
-
247
B9
243
Surface of laminated debris; in Area M
IV
248
F5
232
Surface
IV
249
F6
233
Surface
IV
250
C4
245
Basal dune
V
251
D2
246
Surface south of W32, W36 and W30
IIIB
252
F4
-
Topsoil removal around W28
-
253
E5
-
Topsoil removal and surface with stones and ash
IIIA
254A
E4
-
Topsoil removal and surface
IIIB(?)
254B
E4
254A
Surface
IV
255
D6
207
Surface make-up south of W20 and W40
IIIB
256
D5
244
Surface with mudbrick debris
IV
257
F4
252
Surface south of W33
IIIB
258
D5
244
Surface with mudbrick debris
IV
259
D2
246
Surface east of W30
IIIB
260
D2
259
Surface above basal dune
IV
261
D6
255
Surface below W20
IV
262
F5
248
Basal dune
V
263
D2
260
Basal dune
V
264
D2
251
Surface above basal dune
IV
265
F6
249
Surface make-up
IV
266
D4
-
Topsoil removal and burnt mudbrick debris above smelting installations
IIIA
291
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
267
F4
252
Basal dune
V
268
E5
253
Surface make-up
IIIB
269
D2
251
Surface above basal dune
IV
270
D3
-
Topsoil removal
-
271
F4
252
Combined into L257
IIIB
272
E5
268
Surface above basal dune
IV
273
D4
266
Debris of burnt mudbrick and ash around smelting installations
IIIB
274
F4
257
Surface north of W33 and W28
IIIB
275
D3
270
Surface with debris of burnt mudbrick and ash near smelting installations
IIIB
276
D2
251
Surface between W35 and W30
IIIB
277
F2
-
Topsoil removal and surface south of W36
IIIA
278
F2
277
Debris north of W36
IIIB(?)
279
D3
270
Debris of burnt mudbrick and ash above smelting installations
IIIA
280
E2
-
Topsoil removal and surface with decayed mudbrick south of W36
IIIB
281
E5
253
Surface west of W34
IIIB
282
E5
272
Debris within pit
IV
283
E5
272
Debris within pit
IV
284
E4
254B
Debris within pit
IV
285
F2
277
Surface south of W36
IIIB
286
D5
244
Debris within burnt mudbrick installation
IIIB
287
F3
-
Topsoil removal and surface west of W38
IIIA
288
E2
-
Topsoil removal and surface north of W36
IIIB(?)
289
D3
279
Surface with burnt mudbrick and ash around smelting installations
IIIB
290
F2
278
Combined into L294
IV
291
D3
275
Surface make-up near smelting installations
IIIB
292
D5
-
Storage jar partially embedded in W20
II
293
E2
288
Surface above basal dune
IV
294
F2
285
Surface above basal dune
IV
295
E2
280
Surface above basal dune
IV
296
C3
W37
Topsoil removal and surface above basal dune
IIIB(?)
297
C2
-
Topsoil removal and surface south of W30
IIIB(?)
298
E3
-
Topsoil removal and surface
IIIA
299
F3
287
Debris above surface west of W39
IIIB
300
C3
-
Surface with burned ash and mudbrick west of W37
IIIA
301
E2
-
Infant burial in storage jar embedded in W36
II
302
E3
298
Surface
IIIB
303
E6
231
Combined into L208
IIIA
304
D6
-
Infant burial in storage jar partially embedded in W20
II
305
D6
-
Infant burial in storage jar partially embedded in W20
II
306
D5–6
-
Child burial covered by ceramic fragments, partially embedded in W20
II
307
F3
299
Surface
IIIB
292
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
308
C2
-
Topsoil removal and debris west of W30
IV–IIIB
309
C3
300, W37
Surface with ash
IIIB
310
D5
256
Surface
IV
311
F3
-
Topsoil removal and surface east of W38
IIIB(?)
312
C2
297
Surface make-up
IV–IIIB
313
E3
302
Surface
IIIB
314
D5
310
Debris on ashy layer within basal dune
V
315
C2
-
Topsoil removal and surface west of W30
IIIB(?)
316
F3
311
Surface above basal dune
IV
317
C–D4
-
Debris of burnt mudbrick above smelting installations
IIIA
318
E3
302
Surface above basal dune
V–IV
319
E4
254B
Debris within probe on basal dune
IV
320
E6
303, 231
Combined into L208
IIIA
321
E2
293
Debris within pit
IV
322
E6
231, 320
Surface south of W21
IIIB
323
F3
-
Infant burial in storage jar, partially embedded in W38
II
324
F3
-
Large holemouth-jar fragment adjacent to W38
IIIB
325
C3
-
Probe into burnt mudbrick debris near metallurgical installations
III
326
E6
322
Surface
IV
327
E6
222
Debris within pit
IV
328
C–D/3–4
317
Surface around smelting installations
IIIB
329
D5
314
Basal dune on brown marly layer
V
330
D5
329
Sterile brown marly layer
Pre-V
331
F2
287
Surface west of W38
IIIB
332
F5
-
Child burial in a pit
II
333
E6
231
Debris within pit full of small stones
IIIA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
400
A–B8
-
Probe into light brown matrix
I
401
E4
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
402
E5
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
403
E8
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
404
D4
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
405
D8
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
406
D8
405
Debris below topsoil
I
407
D8
405
Surface south of W41
I
408
E5
402
Disturbed debris below topsoil
I
409
D8
405
Disturbed debris west of W41
-
410
E8
403
Surface north of W44
I
411
E4
401
Mixed debris below topsoil
I(?)
412
D4
404
Mixed debris below topsoil
I(?)
413
D4
404
Mixed debris below topsoil
I(?)
Area C
293
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
414
E8
410
Surface make-up
I
415
D8
406
Surface(?) south of W41/W44
I
416
E8
414
Probe into sterile sand dune below surface
-
417
E5
408
Surface south of W43
I
418
E8
403
Surface south of W44
I
419
D8
406
Combined into L415
I
420
D8
409
Combined into L409
(?)
421
D7–8
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
422
E4
411
Surface
I
423
D8
415
Surface make-up
I
424
E5
408
Surface north of W43 and west of W46
I
425
E8
410
Combined into L410
I
426
D4
413
Robber trench
(?)
427
D–E5
-
Debris below topsoil
-
428
C–D8
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
429
E4
411
Surface
I
430
C–D8
428
Debris below topsoil
I
431
E4
429
Surface make-up
I
432
E4
422
Surface make-up
I
433
E4–5
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
-
434
D–E5
427
Basal dune west of W43
(?)
435
D7–8
421
Debris north of W45
I
436
E4–5
433
Stone pavement
I
437
D7–8
435
Combined into L435
I
438
E8
425
Combined into L414
I
439
D8
405, 407
Surface make-up
I
440
E5
417
Surface make-up
I
441
E5
424
Combined into L424
I
442
E5
408
Combined into L440
I
443
E8
418
Surface make-up
I
444
E4–5
411
Combined into L436
I
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
500
B11
-
Topsoil removal
-
501
B12
-
Topsoil removal
-
502
C11
-
Topsoil removal
-
503
C12
-
Topsoil removal
-
504
D11
-
Topsoil removal and debris on surface
II
505
B11
500
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
-
506
C11
-
Surface
IIIA
507
E18
-
Topsoil removal
-
508
B12
501
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
-
509
E18
507
Debris outside of Granary 511
-
510
C12
503
Surface
II
Area D
294
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
511
E18
507
Floor within Granary 511
III(?)
512
D10
-
Topsoil removal and surface
II
513
E18
511
Section through floor of Granary 511
III(?)
514
D11
-
Combined into L504
II
515
D10–11
-
Topsoil removal and debris on W50
-
516
C11
506
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
517
C12
510
Debris within pit
II
518
C12
510
Debris within pit
II
519
C11
516
Surface south of W51
IIIB
520
E18
507
Topsoil removal west of Granary 511
-
521
C12
510
Surface
IIIA
522
C–D11
-
Topsoil removal
-
523
-
-
Cancelled
-
524
D10
512
Surface and surface make-up
II
525
-
-
Cancelled
-
526
D10
-
Debris within Byzantine well
I
527
C–D11
522
Debris between W53 and W158
III–II
528
C10
-
Topsoil removal and exposure of top of W156
-
529
D10
524
Surface east of W50
II
530
D11
504
Surface and surface make-up west of W50
II
531
D11
530
Floor within Structure D7
IIIA
532
C12
521
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
533
C12
532
Debris below surface make-up down to basal dune
IV–III
534
D10
529
Surface and surface make-up east of W50
II
535
C11
519
Surface and surface make-up south of W51
IIIB
536
D10
529
Surface and surface make-up east of W55
IIIA
537
C10
528
Surface north of W156
IIIA
538
C11
535
Thin layer of debris on sterile basal dune
IV
539
D10
536
Surface
IV
540
C10
537
Surface and surface make-up north of W156
IIIA
541
C10
528
Debris above surface south of W156
III(?)
542
C–D11
527
Debris
III(?)
543
C10
540
Surface
IV
544
C10
541
Surface south of W156
IIIA
545
D–E11
542
Surface between W53, W57 and W50
II
546
C10
544
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
547
C10
543
Surface and surface make-up north of W156
IV
548
D10
539
Surface and surface make-up north of W156
IV
549
D10
548
Debris below base of W156, down to sterile basal dune
V
550
C–D10
547
Debris below base of W156
V
551
D–E11
545
Floor within Structure D7
IIIA
552
-
-
Unused locus number
-
553
D9
-
Topsoil removal
-
554
E10
-
Topsoil removal
-
555
E6
-
Topsoil removal
-
556
E10
554
Surface east of W50
II
295
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
557
D9
553
Surface
II
558
C9
-
Topsoil removal
-
559
E9
-
Topsoil removal
-
560
D8
-
Topsoil removal
-
561
E7
-
Topsoil removal
-
562
C9
558
Debris above surface and W160
III(?)
563
E8
-
Topsoil removal
-
564
E8
563
Surface
II
565
E6
555
Debris on W62
II(?)
566
D9
557
Surface with dark ash debris and surface make-up
IIIA
567
E9
559
Surface
II
568
E7
561
Combined into L1030
IIIA
569
E9
567
Surface make-up
II
570
E10
556
Surface make-up and debris above surface east of W161
IIIA–II
571
C–D9
-
Topsoil in balk removal
-
572
C9
562
Floor in western portion of Building D8
IIIA
573
E9
569
Surface with dark ash debris
IIIA
574
E11
-
Topsoil removal
-
575
C8
-
Topsoil removal
-
576
C9–10
-
Balk removal
-
577
E7
568
Combined into L1030
IIIA
578
C–D9
566
Combined into L1000
IIIB
579
E6
565
Surface north of W162
II
580
C8
575
Floor within eastern portion of Building D8
IIIA
581
E11
574
Surface
II
582
D8
560
Surface
II
583
E8
564
Debris between W164 and W163
IIIA
584
C9–10
562
Surface with dark gray debris between W160 and W156
IIIA
585
C9
572
Floor make-up within western portion of Building D8
IIIA
586
E6
579
Surface make-up north of W162
II
587
E6
586
Surface south of W165
IIIA
588
C9
585
Stone pavement within Building D8
IIIB
589
E8
564
Surface make-up on W163 and W164
II
590
E7
577
Debris north of W163
IIIA(?)
591
E8
589
Surface south of W163
IIIA
592
E9
573
Combined into L573
IIIA
593
E11
581
Surface and surface make-up
II
594
C8
580
Floor and floor make-up within eastern portion of Building D8
IIIA
595
E6
565
Floor within structure of W162
II
596
D8
582
Combined into L597
IIIA
597
D8
582
Surface on W156
IIIA
598
D6
-
Topsoil removal
-
599
D8
597
Surface make-up on W156
IIIA
1000
D9
584
Surface with dark brown debris between Building D8 and W156
IIIB
296
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1001
E8
591
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
1002
G9
-
Topsoil removal
-
1003
G8
-
Topsoil removal
-
1004
G7
-
Topsoil removal
-
1005
G6
-
Topsoil removal
-
1006
H9
-
Topsoil removal
-
1007
H8
-
Topsoil removal
-
1008
H7
-
Topsoil removal
-
1009
H6
-
Topsoil removal
-
1010
C8
594
Stone pavement within Building D8
IIIB
1011
F10
-
Surface and surface make-up south of W171
IIIA
1012
F11
-
Surface
IIIA
1013
E9
592
Combined into L573
IIIA
1014
D7
-
Topsoil removal
-
1015
D7
1014
Surface
II
1016
E7
577
Surface and surface make-up south of W163
IIIA
1017
E9
592
Combined into L573
IIIA
1018
F9
-
Debris
III–II
1019
C8
1010
Stone pavement within Building D8
IIIB
1020
E6
587
Surface and surface make-up south of W165
IIIA
1021
E6
595
Surface with debris east of W162
II
1022
F9
1018
Debris
III–II
1023
D8
599
Surface with dark ash debris and surface make-up south of W156
IIIB
1024
D8
599
Debris to the north of W156
IV–IIIB
1025
F8
-
Topsoil removal
-
1026
F8
1025
Surface and surface make-up
II
1027
D6
598
Surface on W156
IIIB
1028
D7
1015
Surface make-up
II
1029
C8
575
Surface(?) east of Building D8
III
1030
E7
1016
Combined into L1016
IIIA
1031
D9
1000
Combined into L1000
IIIA
1032
F8
1026
Surface within Structure D6
IIIA
1033
D9
566
Surface north of W156
IIIB
1034
D9
1033
Surface and surface make-up north of W156
IIIB
1035
D8
1023
Surface between W156 and W181
IV
1036
E7
1030
Surface and surface make-up north of W156
IIIB
1037
D7
1028
Surface south of W156
IIIB
1038
F6
-
Topsoil removal
-
1039
D7
1037
Surface make-up south of W156
IIIB
1040
D8
1035
Surface make-up between W156 and W181
IV
1041
E8
1001
Surface and surface make-up north of W167
IV
1042
F6
1038
Debris
III–II
1043
D6
1027
Surface south of W156
IV
1044
D8
1040
Surface and surface make-up
V
1045
E8
1041
Surface and surface make-up
V
297
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1046
D6
1043
Surface and surface make-up south of W156
IV
1047
E6
595
Floor make-up within structure of W162
II
1048
E10
570
Surface and surface make-up east of W161
IIIA
1049
F11
1012
Surface make-up
IIIA
1050
F10
1011
Debris above surface
IIIB–A
1051
G8
1003
Debris
-
1052
F10
1011
Combined into L1050
IIIB–A
1053
F7
-
Surface
II
1054
D12
-
Surface
II
1055
F8
1032
Surface make-up
IIIB
1056
G6
1005
Debris above surface and walls
II(?)
1057
E10
1048
Surface with dark ash debris east of W168
IIIB
1058
G8
1051
Debris—unclear stratification
-
1059
F11
1049
Surface
IIIB
1060
C8
1029
Probe down to surface
IV
1061
H9
-
Topsoil removal
-
1062
H10
-
Topsoil removal
-
1063
H11
-
Topsoil removal
-
1064
G11
-
Topsoil removal
-
1065
H12
-
Topsoil removal
-
1066
G12
-
Topsoil removal
-
1067
F13
-
Topsoil removal
-
1068
E13
-
Topsoil removal
-
1069
H15
-
Topsoil removal
-
1070
H16
-
Topsoil removal
-
1071
D9
1031
Combined into L1031
III
1072
D7
1039
Surface and surface make-up south of W156
IV
1073
D9
1034
Surface north of W156
IVA
1074A
D9
1073
Surface north of W156
IVB
1074B
D9
1074A
Packed kurkar surface
V
1075
F8
1032
Debris within stone installation
IIIA(?)
1076
F8
1055
Combined into L1055
IIIB
1077
E8
1001
Mudbrick debris. Combined into L1001
IIIB
1078
E8
1001
Surface make-up on W167
IIIB
1079
E7
1036
Surface south of W167
IV
1080
F7
1053
Surface and surface make-up
II
1081
F8
1076
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
1082
E7
1078
Surface north of W167
IV
1083
E8
1077, 1001
Surface south of W167
IV
1084
D9
-
Surface between W156 and W181
IV
1085
E9
1017
Surface
IIIB
1086
F12
-
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
1087
E11
593
Floor within Structure D7
IIIA
1088
D9
1084
Surface make-up between W156 and W181
IV
1089
E12
-
Topsoil removal and debris
-
298
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1090
F10
1104
Dark brown debris within pit
IIIB
1091
G10
-
Surface
IIIA
1092
E6
565
Dismantlement of W162
II
1093
E6
1092
Combined into L587
IIIA
1094
E6
1020
Surface between W156 and W182
IV
1095
F8
1081
Surface
IV
1096
E11
1087
Floor and floor make-up within Structure D7
IIIA
1097
F10
1090
Combined into L1090
IIIB
1098
F11
1059
Combined into L1059
IIIB
1099
F12
1086
Surface
IIIB
1100
E11
1096
Floor with dark ash debris within Structure D7
IIIB
1101
F11
1059
Dark brown debris within pit
IIIB
1102
F12
1099
Surface and surface make-up on basal dune
IIIB
1103
D12
1054
Surface make-up and debris
III–II
1104
F10
1101
Debris above surface north of W168
IIIB(?)
1105
H16
1070
Debris
-
1106
G10
1091
Surface make-up
IIIA
1107
H11
1063
Surface with dark ash debris and surface make-up
IIIA
1108
H10
1062
Surface with dark ash debris and surface make-up
IIIA
1109
H9
-
Topsoil removal and debris
-
1110
E6
1020
Combined into L1020
IIIA
1111
H15
1069
Debris
-
1112
E9
1085
Combined into L1085
IIIB
1113
G10
1106
Surface with dark ash debris on basal dune
IIIB
1114
H10
1108
Surface with dark ash debris on basal dune
IIIB
1115
H11
1107
Surface with dark ash debris and surface make-up on basal dune
IIIB
1116
H9
1109
Debris
-
1117
E6
1094
Surface and surface make-up
IV
1118
E9
1112
Surface make-up
IIIB
1119
F10
1104
Surface with dark ash debris east of W168
IIIB
1120
F10/11
-
Balk removal
-
1121
G9
1002
Debris
-
1122A
E9
1118
Combined into L1118
IIIB
1122B
E9
1122A
Surface
IVA
1123
H10
1114
Dark debris within pit
IIIB
1124
G11
1064
Surface and surface make-up
III
1125
E10
1057
Combined into L1057
IIIB
1126A
E9
1122B
Surface
IVB
1126B
E9
1126A
Kurkar surface
V
1127
E6
1117
Surface and surface make-up
V
1128
E10
1125
Surface and surface make-up east of W168
IIIB
1129
F10
1097
Combined into L1090
IIIB
1130
H9
1116
Floor within Structure D6
IIIA
1131
G9
1121
Debris above floor
IIIA(?)
1132
E12
1089
Surface on basal dune west of W172
IIIB
299
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1133
F11
1059
Surface and surface make-up on basal dune
IIIB
1134
G6
1056
Surface north of W177
IIIA
1135
G6
1056
Surface and stone pavement west of W175
II
1136
G6
1135
Surface make-up west of W175
II
1137
H9
1030
Floor within Structure D6
IIIB
1138
G6
1136
Surface north of W180
IIIA
1139
G9
1131
Floor within Structure D6
IIIA
1140
G9
1139
Floor within Structure D6
IIIB
1141
G6
1136
Surface south of W177
IIIA
1142
G9
1140
Floor make-up within Structure D6
IIIB
1143
H9
1137
Floor make-up within Structure D6
IIIB
1144
H9
1137
Surface make-up north of W179
IIIB
1145
G6
1138
Debris
III(?)
1146
C9
588
Probe down to surface
IV
1200
E5
-
Topsoil removal
II(?)
1201
D5
-
Topsoil removal
-
1202
D4
-
Topsoil removal
-
1203
D5
1201
Debris
II
1204
E4
-
Debris above surface
II(?)
1205
D4
1202
Debris on W122
II(?)
1206
E3
-
Debris above surface
II(?)
1207
D3
-
Topsoil removal
-
1208
E5
1200
Surface
II
1209
E4
1204
Surface
II
1210
E3
1206
Surface
II
1211
D3
1207
Debris above W120
-
1212
D4
-
Combined into L1205
II(?)
1213
E4
-
Surface
II
1214
F4
-
Surface
II
1215
D3
-
Combined into L1211
-
1216
D5
1203
Debris
IIIA
1217
E5
1208
Debris
IIIA
1218
E3
-
Combined into L1210
II
1219
D4
1205, 1212
Surface
II
1220A
E4
1209, 1213
Surface west of W121
IIIA
1220B
E4
1220A
Surface and surface make-up west of W121
IIIB
1221
D3
1211
Surface and surface make-up north of W120
II
1222
D5
1216
Debris
IIIB
1223
E5
1217
Debris
IIIB
1224
D3
1211, 1215
Surface south of W120
II
1225
E4
1209, 1213
Surface
II
1226
F4
-
Combined into L1243
II
300
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1227
E3
1210, 1218
Surface make-up
II
1228
D4
1219
Surface make-up
II
1229
D5
1222
Combined into L1317
IV
1230
E5
1208
Mudbrick debris
III(?)
1231
E5
1223, 1230
Surface
IV
1232
D2
-
Surface
II
1233
D1
-
Surface
II
1234
F4
1214
Surface make-up
II
1235
F3
-
Debris above surface
II(?)
1236
E2
-
Debris above W144
II(?)
1237
D3
1221
Floor and floor make-up within Structure D4
IIIB
1238
D3
1224
Debris on W123
II(?)
1239
D4
1228
Combined into L1273
IIIB
1240
D1
1233
Surface make-up
IIIA–II
1241
D3
1224
Debris below surface make-up
III–II
1242
D2
1232
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
1243
F4
1226
Debris on paved installation W125
II
1244
E1
-
Debris above surface
II
1245
F3
1235
Surface
II
1246
G4
-
Debris above surface
II(?)
1247
E2
1236
Debris on W144
II(?)
1248
F4
1234
Surface and surface make-up west of W121
IIIB
1249
F2
-
Topsoil removal
II(?)
1250
D1
1294
Surface
IV
1251
D2
1242
Surface
IIIB
1252
E1
1244
Surface
II
1253
H4
-
Surface
II
1254
G4
1246
Surface
II
1255
F4
1234
Combined into L1234
II
1256
D1
-
Surface
II
1257
E2
-
Combined into L1236
II(?)
1258
D1
1240
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
1259
H4
1253
Surface make-up
II
1260
D1
1256
Combined into L1240
IIIA–II
1261
E1
1252
Surface
IIIA
1262
D1
1260
Combined into L1240
IIIA–II
1263
H4
-
Combined into L1253
II
1264
G4
-
Surface
II
1265
F3
1245
Surface make-up
II
1266
D1
1258
Surface make-up west of W147
IIIB
1267
H4
1281
Debris above surface
IIIA(?)
1268
E1
1261
Surface make-up
IIIA
1269
H4
1259, 1267
Combined into L128
IIIA
301
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1270
D1
1266
Surface west of W147
IIIB
1271
G4
1254, 1264
Combined into L1264
II
1272
F4
1255
Debris north of W139
III–II
1273
D4
1228
Surface and surface make-up south of W149
IIIB
1274
D2
-
Debris
II(?)
1275
E1
1261
Combined into L1268
IIIA
1276
E1
1275
Surface
IIIB
1277
D1
1233
Combined into L1240
III–II
1278
D1
1277, 1262
Combined into L1258
IIIA
1279
D1
1278
Debris above surface
III
1280
E1
-
Combined into L1244
II
1281
H4
1269
Floor within room of Structure D9
IIIA
1282
E2
1257
Surface
II
1283
D1
1279
Surface
IIIB
1284
F4
1272
Debris north of W121 and W139
III
1285
D1
1240
Combined into L1240
IIA–II
1286
F3
1265
Combined into L1289
IIIA
1287
G4
1271
Combined into L1264
II
1288
E4
1225
Floor within Structure D4
IIIA
1289
F3
1265
Floor within Structure D4
IIIA
1290
D3
1221
Combined into L1237
IIIB
1291
E2
1282
Surface make-up and debris below
III–II
1292
H5
-
Surface east of W134
II
1293
E1
1280
Combined into L1252
II
1294
D1
1285
Floor within Structure D3
IIIB
1295
D1
1266
Surface
IV
1296
G3
-
Debris above surface
II(?)
1297
H5
1292
Surface make-up east of W134
II
1298
D2
1251
Surface
IV
1299
E1
1293
Combined into L1261
IIIA
1300
F3
1265
Debris north of W140
IIIA(?)
1301
F2
1249
Debris above surface
II(?)
1302
H5
1297
Debris above surface in Structure D9
IIIA
1303
G4
1271
Debris above surface
III–II
1304
H5
1297
Floor within room of Structure D9
IIIA
1305
H5
1297
Floor within room of Structure D9
IIIA
1306
D4
1239
Surface north of W156
IV
1307
E1
1293
Debris above surface
IIIA
1308
F2
1301
Surface
II
1309
E3
1227
Debris
III–II
1310
D5
1222
Debris within pit cutting into W156
IIIB
1311
D5
1222
Debris within pit cutting into W156
IIIB
1312
D5
1222
Debris within pit cutting into W156
IIIB
1313
F3
1289
Floor within Structure D4
IIIB
302
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1314
F3
1289
Combined into L1349
III
1315
E1
1307
Surface
IIIA
1316
E1
1315
Surface make-up
IIIA
1317
D5
1229
Surface north of W156
IV
1318
G4
1303
Surface
IIIA
1319
G3
1296
Debris above surface east of W137
II(?)
1320
G3
1296
Combined into L1325
II
1321
F3
1289
Combine into L1313
IIIB
1322
E1
1316
Surface west of W147
IIIB
1323
E1
1322
Surface make-up west of W147
IIIB
1324
E1
1323
Combined into L1323
IIIB
1325
G3
1320
Surface west of W137
II
1326
G3
1319
Surface east of W137
II
1327
G3
1320
Shallow pit with small ceramic vessels sunk in L1325 surface
II
1328
G3
1320
Shallow pit with small ceramic vessels sunk in L1325 surface
II
1329
F3
1314
Combined into L1349
III
1330
H5
1292
Combined into L1297
II
1331
G3
1325
Surface make-up west of W137
II
1332
F2
1308
Surface make-up and debris
III–II
1333
E3
1309
Combined into L1309
III–II
1334
D2
1298
Surface
V
1335
E1
1323
Combined into L1336
IV
1336
E1
1335
Surface east of W148
IV
1337
D2
1334
Surface make-up
V
1338
D2
1337
Basal dune
Pre-V
1339
H5
1330
Debris
III–II
1340
H5
1330
Mudbrick pavement within Granary 1340
IIIA
1341
E3
1333
Floor within Structure D4
IIIA
1342
E4
1288
Probe into floor make-up east of W121
IIIA
1343
H5
1340
Probe below mudbrick pavement with Granary 1340
IIIA(?)
1344
F3
1265
Storage jar sunken into floor
IIIA
1345
E5
1231
Surface make-up
IV
1346
H5
1339
Combined into L1305
IIIA
1347
H5
1339
Floor within room of Structure D9
IIIA
1348
G4
1271
Debris south of W136
III(?)
1349
F3
1329
Dismantlement of W138
III
1350
G3
1331
Floor within Structure D4
IIIB
1351
D4
1228
Combined into L1306
IV
1352
H4
1281
Floor make-up within room of Structure D9
IIIA
1353
G4
1318
Surface with dark ash debris south of W155
IIIB
1354
E2
1291
Surface east of W145
IIIA
1355
G4
1353
Surface make-up south of W155
IIIB
1356
E2
1354
Debris
IIIB(?)
1357
F2
1332
Surface
IIIB
303
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
1358
E2
1356
Combined into L1368
IV(?)
1359
G4
1355
Combined into L1355
IIIB
1360
E3
1341
Floor make-up within Structure D4
IIIA(?)
1361
G3
1350
Floor make-up within Structure D4
IIIB
1362
G4
1359
Surface
IV
1363
E5
1345
Probe below surface down to basal dune
IV(?)
1364
G4
1362
Surface and surface make-up down to basal dune
IV
1365
H4
1352
Surface east of W135
IIIB
1366
F3
1313
Floor make-up within Structure D4
IIIB
1367
-
-
Cancelled
-
1368
E2
1358
Debris above floor within Structure D1
IV(?)
1369
H5
1304, 1305
Ceramics on surface and surface make-up
IIIA
1370
H5
1347
Combined into L1347
IIIA
1371
F3
1366
Floor within Structure D2
IV
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
600
J8
-
Topsoil removal
601
J8
600
Fill within Feature 18
602
J8
600
Fill within Feature 19
603
K21
-
Topsoil removal
604
J8
601
Debris below Feature 18
605
K1
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
606
L14
-
Topsoil removal and basal dune
607
K21
603
Surface between W64 and W63
608
K21
603
Surface west of W63
609
K21
603
Surface north of W63
610
I22
-
Topsoil removal and debris on habitation level
611
J22
-
Topsoil removal and debris on habitation level
612
K22
-
Topsoil and debris on habitation level
613
-
-
Unused locus number
614
-
-
Unused locus number
615
-
-
Unused locus number
616
K22
612
Habitation make-up
617
I22
610
Basal dune
618
H22
-
Topsoil removal
619
I21
-
Topsoil removal
620
J21
-
Topsoil removal and debris on habitation level
621
H22
618
Debris on habitation level
622
K22
616
Probe into sterile matrix
623
I21
619
Debris above habitation level
624
J20
-
Topsoil removal
625
I20
-
Topsoil removal and debris on habitation level
626
J22
611
Habitational make-up
Area E
304
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
627
H22
621
Habitational make-up
628
I22
617
Combined into L617
629
J22
626
Probe into basal dune
630
J20
624
Debris on habitation level and make-up
631
J18
-
Topsoil removal
632
I21
623
Debris on habitation level
633
H22
627
Probe into basal dune
634
J18
631
Basal dune
635
H18
-
Topsoil removal
636
J21
620
Habitation make-up
637
I20
637
Habitation make-up
638
J20
630
Basal dune
639
H18
635
Basal dune
640
G18
-
Topsoil removal
641
I20
637
Basal dune
642
I21
632
Debris within pit
643
J21
636
Combined into L661
644
G16
-
Topsoil removal
645
E12–13
-
Topsoil removal around Features 1, 2 and 3
646
G11
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 5
647
-
-
Unused locus number
648
-
-
Unused locus number
649
F9
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 7
650
G9
-
Topsoil removal around Features 8, 9 and 10
651
F8
-
Topsoil removal around Features 11 and 12
652
F7
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 14
653
H6
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 15
654
F4
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 16
655
H18
639
Combined into L639
656
J18
634
Combined into L634
657
G18
640
Basal dune
658
G16
644
Basal dune
659
F4
654
Topsoil removal around Feature 16
660
F7
652
Topsoil removal around Feature 14
661
J21
643
Debris within pit
662
G11
646
Topsoil removal around Feature 5
663
F7
652
Topsoil removal around Feature 14
664
H6
653
Topsoil removal around Feature 15
665
F7
652
Topsoil removal around Feature 14
666
G9
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 8
667
F10
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 6
668
H/34
-
Topsoil removal around Feature 17
305
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Area F Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
700
-
-
Topsoil removal
701
-
700
Probe into basal dune
702
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
703
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
704
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
705
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
706
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
707
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
708
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
709
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
710
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
711
-
700
Burial deposits within cist
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
801
F3
-
Topsoil removal
-
802
G4
-
Topsoil removal
-
803
G1
-
Topsoil removal and debris
-
804
G1
803
Debris within upper portion of Unclear
IV(?)
805
G3
-
Topsoil
-
806
G4
802
Mixed debris east of W81
IV–IIIB
807
H3
-
Topsoil removal
-
808
H2
-
Topsoil removal
-
809A
G2
-
Topsoil removal and surface
IIIA–I
809B
G2
809A
Surface
IIIB
810
F2
-
Topsoil removal
-
811
G1
803
Sterile sand of basal dune around Pit 1439
Pre-IV
812
H3
807
Fill of topsoil within intrusive pits
-
813
G3
805
Fill of topsoil within intrusive pits
-
814
G4
802
Surface and surface make-up west of W81
IIIB–A
815
G2
809B
Surface
IV
816
G3
805
Surface west of W81
IIIB
817
F4
-
Topsoil removal
-
818
F3
801
Surface between W85 and Granary 833
IV–IIIB
819
E2
-
Topsoil removal
-
820
E3
-
Topsoil removal
-
821
E2
819
Accumulation on habitation surface
IIIB–A
822
H2
808
Surface
IIIA
823
F4
817
Debris
IV–I
824
E2
819
Floor within Building G1
IIIA
825
E3
820
Floor within Building G1
IV
826
H2
808
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
827
G4
814
Fill below surface on basal dune
IIIB
Area G
306
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
828
E–F2
-
Topsoil removal
-
829
E–F2
828
Floor with Building G1
IIIA
830
H3
807
Surface east of W81
IIIA
831
D2
-
Topsoil removal
-
832
H3
830
Combined into L830
IIIA
833
F3
801
Debris within Granary 833
IIIB
834
H4
-
Topsoil removal
-
835
H4
834
Surface and surface make-up south of W96
IIIB
836
F2
810
Surface east of W82
IIIB
837
E1
-
Topsoil removal
-
838
E1
837
Debris next to W85
IV–IIIA
839
D2
831
Debris below topsoil
-
840
F3
833
Floor make-up with mudbrick fragments within Granary 833
IIIB
841
F3
840
Debris within upper portion of Silo 869
IV–IIIB
842
G–H2
-
Topsoil removal
-
843
G–H2
842
Debris in open area west of W88
IIIB–A
844
G–H2
842
Debris in open area west of W88
IIIB–A
845
G3
816
Surface make-up west of W81
IIIB
846
F3–4
-
Topsoil removal
-
847
E1–2
-
Topsoil removal and debris
-
848
E1–2
-
Topsoil removal and debris
-
849
D2
839
Habitation surface around mudbrick Granary 865
IV–IIIB
850
D2
839
Upper portion of debris within installation
IV(?)
851
I2
-
Topsoil removal
-
852
I2
851
Surface
IIIA
853
H2
822
Surface make-up
IIIA
854
G–H3
-
Topsoil removal
-
855
F1
-
Topsoil removal
-
856
F–G3
887
Topsoil removal and debris
-
857
F1
855
Disturbed debris on habitation surface
IV(?)
858
G–H3
854
Debris east of W81
IV–IIIA
859
F2
836
Combined into L873
IV
860
G–H3
854
Debris
IV–I
861
I3
-
Topsoil removal and debris within pits
I
862
H3
830
Surface make-up east of W81
IIIA
863
F1
857
Section into basal dune below and outside Building G1
IV(?)
864
E–F2
829
Floor within Building G1
IIIB
865
D2
850
Lower portion of debris within Granary 865
IV
866
F1–2
-
Trial trench near continuation of W85
IV–I
867
J2
-
Topsoil removal
-
868
I3
861
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
869
F3
841
Floor of mudbrick material within Silo 869
IV
870
G–H2
815, 843
Surface make-up
IV
871A
J2
867
Surface and surface make-up south of W94
IIIA
871B
J2
871A
Surface south of W94
IIIB
307
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
872
F2
836
Surface make-up east of W82
IIIB
873
F2
872
Surface east of W82
IV
874
D2
865
Section through floor of mudbrick material within Granary 865
IV
875
I2
852
Surface make-up
IIIA
876
F2
873
Surface make-up east of W82
IV
877
J1
-
Topsoil removal
-
878A
J1
877
Surface and surface make-up west of W90
IIIA
878B
J1
878A
Surface and surface make-up west of W90
IIIB
879
K2
-
Topsoil removal
-
880
J1
877
Combined into L878A
IIIA
881
I1
-
Topsoil removal
-
882
I2
875
Surface east of W92
IIIB
883
I3
868
Surface east of W105
IIIB
884
F3
818
Probe next to outer face of W83/W103
IV–IIIB
885
K2
879
Surface south of W94 and west of W93
IIIA
886A
I1
881
Surface
IIIA
886B
I1
886A
Surface make-up
IIIB–A
887
F–G3
856
Probe adjacent to Silo 869
IV(?)
888A
K2
879
Surface and surface make-up south of W94 and east of W93
IIIA
888B
K2
888A
Surface south of W94
IIIB
889
P3
-
Topsoil removal
-
890
P4
-
Topsoil removal
-
891
O3
-
Topsoil removal
-
892
O4
-
Topsoil removal
-
893
N3
-
Topsoil removal
-
894
N4
-
Topsoil removal
-
895
M3
-
Topsoil removal
-
896
M4
-
Topsoil removal
-
897
P3
889
Surface
IV
898
P4
890
Debris above surface north of W101
IV(?)
899
O3
891
Debris
IV–IIIB
900
O4
892
Surface
IV
901
N3
893
Probe into disturbed debris
IV–I
902
N3
893, 901
Surface
IV
903
N4
894
Surface
IV
904
M3
895
Surface
IV(?)
905
M4
896
Sterile basal dune
-
906
M4
896
Debris within pit
IV(?)
907
O–P3
891
Combine into L991
IV
908
P5
-
Topsoil removal
-
909
O5
-
Topsoil removal
-
910
N5
-
Topsoil removal
-
911
M5
-
Topsoil removal
-
912
H3
862
Floor within Building G2
IIIB
308
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
913
K3
-
Topsoil removal
-
914A
J2
871B
Surface make-up south of W94
IIIB
914B
J2
914A
Surface south of W94
IV
915
J3
-
Topsoil removal
-
916
I3
883
Surface make-up east of W105
IIIB
917
H3
832, 858
Surface west of W84
IIIB
918
J1
878B
Surface west of W90
IV
919
J1–2, J–K2
-
Topsoil removal
-
920A
K3
913
Debris
IIIB–A
920B
K3
920A
Surface
IV
921
I1
886B
Surface north of W92
IIIB
922
I2
882
Combined into L936
IIIB
923
H–I3
-
Topsoil removal
-
924
H4
835
Surface south of W96
IV
925
H–I2
-
Topsoil removal
-
926
L2
-
Topsoil removal
-
927
J1
878B
Combined into L918
IV
928A
J3
915
Surface
IIIA
928B
J3
928A
Surface
IIIB
929
H–I2
925
Debris
IIIA(?)
930
H–I3
923
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
931
M2
-
Topsoil removal
-
932
L2
926
Floor within eastern addition to Building G3
IIIA
933
K1
-
Topsoil removal
-
934
K4
-
Topsoil removal
-
935
J3
928B
Surface
IV
936
H–I2
853, 929
Floor within Building G2
IIIB
937
H–I/3–4
-
Topsoil removal and debris
IV–I
938
K1
933
Floor within Building G3
IV
939
L2
926
Surface south of W95
IIIA
940
M2
931
Surface
IIIA
941
H–I3
912, 930
Floor make-up within Building G2
IIIB
942
K2
879
Floor within Building G3
IIIA
943
L2
939
Surface make-up south of W95
IIIA
944
K–J1
877, 933
Floor within Building G3
IIIA
945
K–L2
-
Balk removal
IIIB–I
946
I3
916
Surface east of W105
IV
947
H–I3
936
Combined into L936
IIIB
948
O2
-
Topsoil removal
-
949
N2
-
Topsoil removal
-
950
N2
849
Surface
IIIB
951A
M2
940
Surface
IIIB
951B
M2
951A
Surface
IV
952
L2
-
Topsoil removal
-
953
E–F2
864
Floor make-up within Building G1
IIIB
954
O2
948
Surface and surface make-up south of Structure G4
IIIB
309
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
955
L1
952
Floor and floor make-up within eastern addition to Building G3
IIIA
956
K2
942
Floor make-up within Building G3
IIIA
957
I2
882
Surface make-up east of W92
IIIB
958
H2
826
Surface and surface between W88 and W84
IIIB
959
E–F2
953
Floor within Building G1
IV
960
E–F2
953
Floor within Building G1
IV
961
N1
-
Topsoil removal
-
962
N2
950
Debris within lined pit
IIIB
963
H2
958
Surface and surface make-up west of W84
IV
964
N2
950
Probe into debris within pit
IV(?)
965
F3
869
Floor make-up and sterile soil within Silo 869
IV
966
P2
-
Topsoil and debris within pit
I
967
O1
-
Topsoil removal
-
968
O1
967
Disturbed debris
IV–I
969
N1
961
Disturbed debris
IV–I
970
H4
924, 937
Surface make-up south of W96
IV
971
P2
966
Debris
IIIB(?)
972
K–L1
-
Topsoil removal and debris
-
973
P2
966, 971
Surface south W99
IIIB
974
O3
899
Surface northwest of Granary 991
IV
975
N1
961
Combined into L969
IV–I
976
M2
951B
Surface make-up
IV
977
K–L1
972
Debris
IIIA(?)
978
Q2
-
Topsoil removal
-
979
O2
954
Surface south of W97
IV
980
R2
-
Topsoil removal
-
981
R2
980
Debris
IV–IIIA
982
Q2
978
Debris
IV–IIIA
983
P2
971
Floor within Structure G4
IIIB
984
N1
969
Disturbed debris
IV–I
985
O–P3
-
Balk removal
-
986
L–M1
-
Balk removal
IV–I
987
S2
-
Topsoil removal
-
988
S2
987
Debris
IV–IIIA
989
P2
983
Floor make-up within Structure G4
IIIB
990
O–P2
-
Topsoil in balk
-
991
O–P3
907, 985
Floor of mudbrick material within Granary 991
IV
992
O2
979
Surface make-up south of W97
IV
993
I2
957
Trial section through Stratum IV floor down to basal dune
IV(?)
994
I3
916
Debris within pit
IIIA
995
H3
941
Probe below Stratum III level down to Stratum IV floor and basal dune
IV
996
K1
944
Floor make-up within Building G3
IIIA
997
U2
-
Topsoil removal
-
310 Locus
AMIR GOLANI
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
998
U2
997
Debris
IV–IIIA
999
T2
1401
Topsoil removal
-
1401
T2
999
Debris
IV–IIIA
1402
Q2
982
Debris
IV–IIIB
1403
O1–2
-
Balk removal
IIIB–I
1404
K1
996
Floor and floor make-up within Building G3
IIIB
1405
H2
947
Floor make-up within Building G2
IIIB
1406
O5
909
Debris above surface
IV
1407
N5
910
Surface north of W101
IV(?)
1408
M5
911
Surface
IV(?)
1409
H2
1405
Floor within Building G2
IV
1410
K1
1404
Floor within Building G3
IV
1411
O4
900
Surface make-up
IV
1412
P4
898
Surface north of W101
IV
1413
P5
908
Surface south of W101
IV
1414
H3
941
Floor within Building G2
IV
1415
O6
-
Topsoil removal
-
1416
O6
1415
Debris
IV–I
1417
L1
955
Floor and floor make-up within eastern addition to Building G3
IIIB
1418
O5
1406
Surface north of W101
IV
1419
O5
1418
Surface make-up north of W101
IV
1420
P5
1413
Surface make-up south of W101
IV
1421
K2
956
Probe to locate southern portion of W98
IV–IIIB
1422
Q4
-
Topsoil removal
-
1423
Q4
1422
Debris
IV–I
1424
Q3
-
Topsoil removal
-
1425
P4
898
Surface south of W101
IV
1426
Q3
1424
Debris
IV–IIIB
1427
L–M1
-
Surface east of W102
IIIB
1428
Q3
1426
Surface north of W101
IV
1429
L1
1417
Debris within installation
IV
1430
L1
1417
Surface east of W98
IV
1431
Q3
1426
Surface south of W101
IV
1432
U2
998
Debris
IV–IIIA
1433
G2
870
Debris within pit
IV
1434
G2
870
Debris within pit
IV
1435
G2
870
Debris within pit
IV
1436
G2
870
Debris within pit
IIIB
1437
F1
863
Child burial in holemouth jar
IV
1438
F1
863
Debris within pit
IV
1439
G1
803
Debris within pit
IV
1440
G1
804
Debris within pit
IV
1441
G2
815
Ṭabun
IV
1442
K1
1404
Round mudbrick installation
IV
311
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Area H Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
4000
B23
-
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion within pit
I
4001
C22
Topsoil removal and debris
II)?(
4002
C24
-
Topsoil removal and dark debris
II)?(
4003
B23
-
Topsoil removal and surface(?)
II
4004
C23
-
Topsoil removal and debris
II)?(
4005
B24
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
4006
B22
-
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
I)?(
4007
C22
4001
Surface north of W400
II
4008
C22
4001
Surface east of W400
II
4009
B24
4005
Debris
IV)?(
4010
B22
-
Topsoil removal and stone pavement
II
4011
B22
-
Stone pavement(?)
II
4012
B22
4010
Debris above surface
IIIA)?(
4013
C22
4001
Surface south of W400
II
4014
B24
4005
Floor within Building H1
IV
4015
C23
4004
Surface
II
4016
C24
4002
Surface
II
4017
C23
4015
Surface make-up
II
4018
B24
4009
Surface and surface make-up west of W421
IV
4019
B24
4005
Surface and surface make-up east of W421
IV
4020
C24
4016
Surface make-up
II
4021
C24
4020
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
4022
C23
4017
Surface
IIIA
4023
C22
4008
Combined into L4036
IIIA
4024
B21
-
Topsoil removal and surface
II
4025
C23
4022
Surface make-up
IIIA
4026
C23
4022
Combined into L4025
IIIA
4027
C23
4022
Surface
IIIA
4028
D23
-
Topsoil removal and surface
II
4029
B22
4012
Combined into L4035
IIIA
4030
C24
4021
Debris within pit; donkey burial(?)
IIIB
4031
B23
4003
Surface make-up and probe down to basal dune
IV–IIIA
4032
C21
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris above surface
II(?)
4033
D24
-
Topsoil removal and surface
II
4034
B21
4024
Surface make-up
III–II
4035
B22
4029
Combined into L4047
IIIA
4036
C22
4023
Surface
IIIA
4037
C22
4013
Combined into L4036
IIIA
4038
C21
4032
Surface
II
4039
B23
4031
Surface
IIIA
4040
B22
4035
Probe into surface make-up down to basal dune
IV–IIIA
4041
C21
4038
Surface make-up
II
4042
B21
4035
Combined into L4047
IIIA
4043
D24
4033
Surface make-up
III–II
312
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
4044
D21
-
Surface and surface make-up
II
4045
D24
4043
Surface
IIIA
4046A
D24
4045
Surface
IIIB
4046B
D24
4046A
Surface
IV
4047
B21
4042
Surface
IIIA
4048
C21
4041
Surface
IIIA
4049
B24
4014
Floor make-up within Building H1
IV
4050
B21
4047
Probe into surface make-up down to basal dune
IV–III
4051
C21
4048
Surface make-up
IIIA
4052
C21
4051
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
4053
D20
-
Topsoil removal and surface(?)
II
4054
C21
4048
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
4055
D23
4028
Surface
IIIA
4056
C20
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
4057
C21
4054
Probe into light brown debris down to basal dune
IV(?)
4058
B21
4047
Surface make-up
IIIA
4059
B20
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
4060
D23
4028
Combined into L4055
IIIA
4061
B20
4059
Surface north of W407
IIIA
4062
C20
4056
Debris on fill of pit
II
4063
D21
4044
Combined into L4081
IIIA
4064
D21
4044
Combined into L4081
IIIA
4065
B19
-
Surface and surface make-up
II)?(
4066
D19
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II
4067
C20
4062
Fill within pit
II
4068
D21
-
Combined into L4081
IIIA
4069
B21
-
Mudbrick and potsherd installation
IIIA
4070
C21
-
Pithos within pit
IIIA
4071A
C19
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
4071B
C19
4071A
Surface
IIIA
4072
D20
4053
Debris within refuse pit
IIIA
4073
B20
4061
Surface make-up
IIIA
4074
C21
-
Combined into L4058
IIIA
4075
B21
4047
Surface make-up around Installation 4069
IIIA
4076
D20
4072
Combined into L4072
IIIA
4077
B20
4073
Probe into light brown debris and basal dune
IV–IIIB
4078
D21
4063
Debris within pit(?)
IIIA
4079
D20
4076
Combined into L4072
IIIA
4080
B20
4077
Basal dune
IV–IIIB
4081
D21
-
Surface
IIIA
4082
C20
4067
Probe into light brown debris
III(?)
4083
B18
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
4084
C18
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
4085
D20
4079
Base of pit and basal dune
IV–III
4086
C20
4082
Continuation of probe down to basal dune
IV–III (?)
313
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
4087
D19
4066
Surface
IIIA
4088
D18
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
4089A
D19
4087
Surface
IIIB
4089B
D19
4089A
Debris below surface on basal dune
IV–IIIB
4090
D21–22
-
Balk removal and exposure of W402
IIIA–II
4091
B19
-
Surface between W417 and W416
IIIA
4092
C19
4071
Surface
IIIA
4093
B17
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
4094
C17
-
Topsoil removal and debris
II(?)
4095
B19
-
Surface north of W420
IIIA
4096
B19
-
Surface
IIIB
4097
B19
4091
Surface
IIIB
4098
C19
-
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
4099
A19
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
4100
D17
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II–I(?)
4101
C18
4084
Mudbrick debris above surface
IIIA(?)
4102
B19
-
Surface
IIIB
4103
D21–22
-
Mudbrick debris next to W402
IIIA
4104
C22
4036
Probe into and below surface make-up
IIIB–A
4105
C16
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
4106
C18
4101
Surface between W403 and W404
IIIA
4107
C22
4104
Probe below surface make-up down to basal dune
IIIB(?)
4108
C18
4084
Surface west of W404
IIIA
4109
B18
4083
Surface
IIIA
4110
B19
4097
Combined into L4097
IIIB
4111
C18
-
Probe west and below base of W404
IV–IIIB
4112
B19
-
Combined into L4095
IIIA
4113
C17
4094
Surface west of W403
IIIA
4114
B18
4109
Surface make-up
IIIA
4115
C18
-
Surface between W403 and W404
IIIB
4116
C19
4071
Combined into L4092
IIIA
4117
B19
4096
Probe below L4096 down to basal dune
IV–III
4118
B19
4110
Combined into L4119
IIIB
4119
B19
4118
Debris within pit
IIIB
4120
B18
4114
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
4121
B19
4119
Combined into L4119
IIIB
4122
C18
-
Combined into L4111
IV–IIIB
4123
C17
4113
Combined into L4113
IIIA
4124
B18
4120
Debris within Silo 4124
IIIB
4125
C18
4108
Surface make-up west of W404
IIIA
4126
C18
4125
Combined into L4111
IV–IIIB
4127
A19
4099
Debris around stones
III–II
4128
B17
4093
Surface west of W411
IIIB
4129
C17
4123
Surface west of W405
IIIB
4130
C18
4126
Combined into L4132
IIIB
314
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
4131
D18
4088
Combined into L4134
IIIA
4132
C18
4126
Debris within base of Silo 4124
IIIB
4133
C17
4123
Surface between W405 and W403
IIIB
4134
D18
4131
Surface
IIIA
4135
D17
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
4136
B16
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
4137
D16
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
4138
D18
-
Debris within pit
IIIA
4139
B15
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
4140
D18
4134
Surface south of W412
IIIB
4141
C17
4133
Probe below surface down to basal dune
IV
4142
C15
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
4143
C18
4126
Fill at base of foundation trench east of Silo 4124
IIIB
4144
D18
4138
Surface
IIIB
4145
C18
4132
Combined into L4132
IIIB
4146A
B16
4136
Surface south of W415
IIIA
4146B
B16
4136
Surface north of W415
IIIA
4147
D18
4144
Surface
IV
4148
C18
4118
Debris within pit between W405 and W404
IIIA(?)
4149
D18
-
Probe below surface down to basal dune
IV
4150
C16
4105
Dark debris below topsoil
IIIA–II
4151
B17
4128
Surface make-up
IIIB
4152
C18
4148
Combined into L4111
IV–IIIB
4153
D17
4135
Surface
IIIA
4154
B17
4151
Probe into debris above surface
IV–IIIB
4155
C17
4094
Debris east of W403
IIIB–A(?)
4156
B17
4154
Surface
IV
4157
B16
4146B
Surface make-up
IIIA
4158
B17
-
Debris east of W411
IIIB(?)
4159
C17
4155
Combined into L4155
IIIB–A(?)
4160
B17
4156
Surface make-up on basal dune
IV
4161
C14
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
4162
D15
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris; in Area M
III–II(?)
4163
C 15
4142
Combined into L4142
II(?)
4164
C16
4150
Surface
IIIB
4165
B16
4157
Combined into L4157
IIIA
4166
C16
4164
Surface make-up
IIIB
4167
B15
4139
Surface
IIIA
4168
D16
4137
Mixed debris
IIIA–II
4169
B16
4165
Surface
IIIB
4170
C16
4166
Child burial covered by ceramic fragments
IIIB
4171
D17
4153
Debris
IIIB
4172
C16
4166
Infant burial in holemouth jar
IIIB
4173
B15
4167
Surface make-up
IIIA
4174
C16–17
-
Balk removal
IIIB–A
315
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
4175
C16
4166
Infant burial covered by ceramic fragments, partly below W413
IIIB
4176
B16
4169
Surface make-up
IIIB
4177
C15
4163
Mixed debris
III–II
4178
C16
4166
Combined into L4166
IIIB
4179
D17
4171
Probe into surface make-up down to basal dune
IV–IIIB
4180
C16–17
-
Balk removal
IIIB–A
4181
D18
-
Trim of southern face of W408
III(?)
4182
C16
4178
Surface(?)
IV
4183
D16–17
-
Balk removal on W409
III–II
4184
D15
4162
Combined into L4162
II(?)
4185
B15
4173
Debris above surface
III–II
4186
C15
4177
Surface
IIIB
4188
D16
4168
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
4189
C16
4182
Surface make-up on basal dune
IV
4190
B15
-
Combined into L4194
IIIB
4191
C17–18
-
Combined into L4094
II(?)
4192
D16
4188
Surface
IV
4193
B15
4185
Surface north of W413
IIIB
4194
B15
4190
Surface south of W413
IIIB
4195
B–C16
-
Balk removal and exposure of W413
III(?)
4196
C16
4166
Child burial covered by ceramic fragments, partly below W413
IIIB
4197
C16
-
Mudbrick debris south of W410
IIIB
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
2027
I5
-
Surface(?)
II(?)
2028
I4
-
Debris south of W208
III–II(?)
2039
I4
2028
Debris above surface south of W208
III(?)
2040
I4
2039
Combined into L2098
III
2044
I4
2039
Surface south of W208
III
2045
I5
2027
Debris above floor north of W208
III)?(
2048
I5
2045
Floor and floor make-up within Structure I1
III
2049
I–J/4–5
-
Balk removal
-
2051
H5
-
Surface(?) west of W211 and on W215
III
2054
H4
-
Debris above surface
III–II)?(
2056
H5
2051
Combined into L2051
III
2059
H4
2054
Surface west of W213
III
2061
J4
-
Surface between W214 and W218
III
2062
J3
-
Surface
III)?(
2063
J3
-
Surface to east of W214
III
2067
H5
2056
Surface east of W215
IV
2068
H4
2059
Surface make-up
III
Area I
316
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
2069
J4
2061
Debris above surface east of W214
III)?(
2072
J3
2062
Surface west of W214
III
2073
J4
2069
Combined into L2094
IV
2074
H4
2068
Surface east of W215
IV
2075
H5
2067
Combined into L2088
IV
2076
I6
-
Debris
III)?(
2077
H3
-
Debris on stone rubble of W213
III)?(
2078
I4
-
Debris above surface east of W213
III)?(
2079
J4
2069
Surface east of W214
III
2080
H4
2074
Surface make-up and probe down to basal dune
IV
2081
H–I5
-
Balk removal
-
2082
I3
-
Debris above surface
III)?(
2083
H–I4
-
Balk removal
-
2084
J2
-
Debris above surface
III)?(
2085
J3
2072
Surface make-up
III
2086
H–I5
2081
Floor within Structure I1
III
2087
I6–5
2076
Floor(?) within Structure I1
III
2088
H5
2067
Surface make-up
IV
2090
H–I5
-
Infant burial in storage jar atop W211
II
2094
J4
2079
Probe below base of W216
IV
2095
H5
Probe below surface down to basal dune
IV
2096
H3
2077
Combined into L2077
III)?(
2097
H–I5
2086
Combined into L2087
III
2098
I4
2078
Surface make-up south of W208
III
2099
J3
2072
Debris within W217
III
2100
J2
2084
Surface east of W214
III
2101
H5
2088
Combined into L2088
IV
2102
H5
-
Combined into L2088
IV
2103
J5
-
Debris
III)?(
2104
I2
-
Debris above surface
III)?(
2105
J4
2061
Surface between W216, 214 and 218
III
2106
J3
2063
Surface make-up
III
2107
I3
2082
Surface west of W214
III
2108
I4
2098
Probe below base of W208 down to surface
IV
2109
I2
2104
Surface
III
2110
J2
2100
Probe below base of W214 down to basal dune
IV
2111
J3
2106
Debris
IV)?(
2112
J4
2105
Surface make-up
III
2113
H3–4
-
Balk removal
-
2114
J4
2061
Surface make-up
III
2115
I4
2108
Surface make-up
IV
2117
H–I3
-
Balk removal
-
2118
I2
2109
Surface make-up
III
2119
I2
2109
Debris
III)?(
2120
I3
2107
Surface make-up
III
317
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
2121
H3
2096, 2096
Dismantlement of stone collapse from W213
III
2122
H5
-
Combined into L2051
III
2125
H3
2121
Combined into L2129
III
2126
I2
2109
Combined into L2118
III
2129
H3
2125
Surface with destruction debris east of W213
III
2131
I–J2
-
Balk removal
-
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
2001
G20
-
Debris—unclear stratification
-
2002
G19
-
Debris—unclear stratification
-
2003
F15
-
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
I(?)
2004
G19
2002
Debris—unclear stratification
-
2005
F11
-
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
I(?)
2006
G19
2004
Probe—unclear stratification
-
2007
G19–20
2002, 2001
Floor within Granary 2007
IIIA
2008
E13
-
Mudbrick debris above surface
IIIA(?)
2009
F11
-
Debris above surface south of W205
IIIA
2010
E13
2008
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
2011
E14
2008
Floor within Granary 2011
IIIA
2012
F12
-
Topsoil removal and definition of Granary 2015
III–II
2013
E11–12
-
Surface
II
2014
E14
-
Debris above surface north of Granary 2011
IIIA(?)
2015
F12
2012
Floor within structure (granary?) bounded by W203
IIIA
2016
F13
-
Topsoil removal and surface south of Granary 2018
IIIA
2017
G20
-
Combined into L2001
-
2018
E–F13
2016
Floor within Granary 2018
IIIA
2019
H19
-
Debris—unclear stratification
-
2020
H19
-
Debris—unclear stratification
-
2021
F13
2016
Surface and surface make-up east of Granary 2018
IIIA
2022
E–F14
-
Surface east of W207
IIIA
2023
E11
2013
Surface north of W205
IIIA
2024
E15
-
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
-
2025
E13–14
-
Debris west of Granary 2011
IIIA
2026
F17
-
Combined into L2030
IIIA
2029
F11
2009
Surface between W203 and W205
IIIA
2030
F17
2026
Floor within Granary 2030
IIIA
2031
E17
-
Mixed and unstratified debris west of Granary 2030
-
2032
F11
-
Surface southeast of W205
IIIA
2033
F11
2029
Combined into L2064
IIIB
2034
F12
2012
Surface east of W203
IIIA
2035
F12
2015
Combined into L2037
IIIB
Area J
318
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
2036
E16
-
Mixed and unstratified debris west of Granary 2030
III(?)
2037
F12
2015
Floor make-up within Granary 2015 and floor south of W209
IIIB–A
2038
F12
2034, 2015
Upper portion of debris within pit
II
2041
F12
2034
Surface north of W209. Cut by Stratum II pit, L2038/2065
IIIB
2042
G12
2012
Debris above surface next to W203 and W212
IIIA(?)
2043
F16
-
Surface south of Granary 2030
IIIA
2046
E16
2036
Mixed and unstratified debris west of Granary 2030
-
2047
E11
2023
Surface make-up
IIIA
2050
F17
-
Surface north of Granary 2030
IIIA
2052
F–G12
2042
Combined into L2053
IIIA
2053
F12
2042
Surface north of W203
IIIA
2055
E11
2047
Surface
IIIB
2057
E11
2055
Surface make-up on basal dune
IIIB
2058
G12
2042
Surface southeast of Granary 2015 and W212
IIIA
2060
G12
2058
Combined into L2058
IIIA
2064
F11
2029
Surface south of W209
IIIB
2065
F12
2038
Lower portion of debris within pit
II
2066
F13
2021
Surface south of W204
IIIB
2070
F13
2021
Surface make-up
IIIB
2071
F14
2022
Surface
IIIB
2089
FI 3
2070
Fill below surface make-up on basal dune
IIIB(?)
2091
F14
2071
Surface make-up and descent into basal dune
IIIB
2092
E14
2014
Surface and surface make-up north of Granary 2011
IIIA
2093
E14
-
Mixed debris and topsoil intrusion
I(?)
2116
F14
2091
Child burial in storage jar
IIIB
2123
H20
-
Infant burial covered with ceramic fragments
II
2124
H20
-
Combined into L2123
II
2127
F11
2064
Surface make-up south of W209
IIIB
2128
F13
2021
Infant burial in storage jar
IIIA
2130
F20
-
Storage-jar fragment east and next to Granary 2007
IIIA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
5001
G2
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5002
H2
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5003
I2
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5004
I3
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5005
J2
-
Surface
II
5006
K3
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
5007
K2
-
Surface
II
5008
L2
-
Surface
II
5009
M2
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
Area K
319
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
5010
L3
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
5011
I2
5003
Debris above surface
IIIB(?)
5012
L2
5008
Surface make-up
II
5013
K3
5006
Surface southeast of W501
IIIB
5014
M2
-
Surface
II
5015
L3
5010
Surface and surface make-up
II
5016
K2
5007
Surface make-up
II
5017
K3
5006
Surface northwest of W501
IIIB
5018
J2–3
5005
Surface between W501 and W506
IIIB
5019
I3
-
Surface
II
5020
H2
5002
Debris above surface
III(?)
5021
G2
-
Surface and surface make-up
II(?)
5022
K–L2
5016
Surface and surface make-up south of W506
IIIB
5023
I3
5019
Surface north of W501
IIIB
5024
H2
-
Combined into L5048
IIIB
5025
K2
5016
Probe west of Granary 5026 down to basal dune
IV–III(?)
5026
K2
5016
Floor within Granary 5026
IIIB
5027
L2
5012
Surface
IIIB
5028
J2
-
Surface south of W506
IIIB
5029
I2
-
Surface and surface make-up south of W502
IIIB
5030
H2
5020
Combined into L5048
IIIB
5031
I3
5023
Probe into surface make-up down to basal dune
III
5032
I2
-
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
5033
L3
5015
Surface make-up
II
5034
K3
5017
Surface make-up
IIIB
5035
J2
5028
Combined into L5028
IIIB
5036
M2
5014
Surface
III
5037
L3
5033
Surface
III
5038
K3
5013
Surface make-up
IIIB
5039
K2
5022
Combined into L5055
II
5040
K2
5022
Combined into L5054
II
5041
I2
5029
Combined into L5029
IIIB
5042
I1
-
Floor within Structure K3
IIIB
5043
J3
-
Surface and surface make-up
II
5044
K2
5016
Combined into L5026
III(?)
5045
M2
5036
Surface make-up
III
5046
K2
5022
Surface north of W506
IIIB
5047
L3
5037
Surface make-up
III
5048
H2
5030
Surface between W501 and W506
IIIB
5049
G3
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5050
H3
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5051
I2
5032
Combined into L5032
IIIB
5052
L2
5027
Surface make-up
IIIB
5053
K2
5007
Infant burial in storage jar above Granary 5026
II
5054
K2
5016
Infant burial within cist
II
320
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
5055
K2
5022
Child burial within cist
II
5056
K2
5022
Skull of child adjacent to Burial 5055
II
5057
L2
5027
Debris within pit (silo?)
IIIB(?)
5058
G2
-
Debris—unclear stratification
III–II
5059
G3
5049
Combined into L5071
IIIA
5060
I1
5042
Floor make-up within Structure K3
IIIB
5061
H3
5050
Floor in the entrance of Building K1
IIIB
5062
G2
5058
Surface and surface make-up southwest of W501
IIIB
5063
H2
5048
Child burial
II
5064
G3
5049
Surface west of W511
IIIA
5065
J3
5043
Combined into L5068
IIIB
5066
G1
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5067
H1
5072
Topsoil removal and floor/surface within and without Structure K3
IIIB
5068
J3
5065
Floor within Building K2
IIIB
5069
N4
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris above surface
II(?)
5070
K5
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
5071
G3
5049
Surface east of W511
IIIA
5072
H1
5067
Surface and surface make-up within of Structure K3
IIIB
5073
H1
5067
Surface and surface make-up west of W514
IIIB
5074
K–L2
5022
Infant burial in holemouth jar
II
5075
J3
5065
Combined into L5068
IIIB
5076
K4
-
Combined into L5098
II
5077
K–L2
5016
Infant burial
II
5078
N4
5069
Surface south and west of W513
II
5079
N5
-
Topsoil removal and floor within Building K4
II
5080
H2
5048
Surface make-up
IIIB
5081
K4
5076
Combined into L5098
II
5082
N6
-
Surface east of W516
II
5083
G3–4
5049
Topsoil and balk removal
III(?)
5084
K5–6
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
5085
N4
5078
Surface make-up
II
5086
N2
-
Topsoil removal and surface
II(?)
5087
O4
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II(?)
5088
N5
5079
Floor and floor make-up within Building K4
II
5089
I3
5043
Combined into L5023
IIIB
5090
K4
-
Combined into L5098
II
5091
H3
5061
Combined into L5161
IIIB
5092
G4
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5093
G5
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5094
G4
5092
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
5095
G5
5093
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
5096
J3
5043
Surface and surface make-up north of W508
IIIB
5097
J5
-
Surface
II(?)
5098
K4
5081
Surface
II
5099
N4
5078
Surface and surface make-up north of W513
II
321
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
5100
O4
5087
Surface south of W513
II
5101
J4
-
Surface
II(?)
5102
G6
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5103
K5
5076
Surface with stone and mudbrick debris within Structure D5
II
5104
G4
-
Combined into L5112
IIIB
5105
G5
5095
Surface west of W518
IIIB
5106
N4
5152A
Probe below surface down to basal dune
IV–III(?)
5107
G5
5095
Surface east of W518
IIIB
5108
M5
-
Topsoil removal and surface south of W522
II
5109
G4
5104
Surface and surface make-up west of W518
IIIB
5110
M4
-
Topsoil removal and surface
IIIB
5111
P5
-
Topsoil removal and surface
II
5112
G4
5104
Surface between W520 and W518
IIIB
5113
N5
5088
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
5114
L5
-
Surface
II
5115
G3–4
-
Balk removal
III(?)
5116
G6
5102
Surface east and south of W521
IIIA
5117
M6
-
Topsoil removal and debris above surface west of W516
II(?)
5118
O5
-
Topsoil removal and floor within Building K4
II
5119
G3
5064
Surface west of W501
IIIB
5120
G6
5116
Surface make-up
IIIA
5121
M5
5108
Surface northwest of W522
II
5122
N5
5113
Combined into L5113
IIIA
5123
K5
5103
Probe below W515 down to surface
III
5124
G6
W521
Surface east of W518
IIIB
5125
G6
5120
Surface west of W518
IIIB
5126
M6
5117
Surface west of W516
II
5127
M5
5121
Surface make-up
II
5128
O5
5118
Floor make-up within Building K4
II
5129
K–L2
-
Balk removal
III–II
5130
I4
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5131
O6
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
-
5132
I4
5130
Debris—unclear stratification
II–I
5133
G7
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–I
5134
L5
5114
Surface
III
5135
M5
5127
Surface
IIIB
5136
O5
5178
Floor make-up within Building K4
II
5137
P5
5111
Surface make-up
II
5138
M5
5135
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
5139
G–I/2–3
-
Balk removal
III–I
5140
J2–3
5018
Surface make-up
IIIB
5141
G–H/2–3
-
Balk removal
III–I
5142
P4
5137
Surface and surface make-up south of W525
IIIA
5143
O5
5136
Floor within Structure K3
IIIA
322
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
5144
I2
-
Topsoil and balk removal
III–I
5145
O4
5100
Surface make-up
II
5146
H2–3
5144
Balk removal
III–I
5147
N5
5122
Surface
IIIB
5148
O4
5145
Surface
IIIA
5149
P5
5137
Surface
IIIA
5150
N6
5082
Surface
IIIB
5151
O6
5131
Debris—unclear stratification
-
5152A
N4
5085
Surface south of W528
IIIA
5152B
O4
5148
Surface make-up
IIIA
5153
G7
5133
Debris—unclear stratification
III(?)
5154
O5
5143
Floor within room of Building K4
IIIB
5155
O5
5143
Surface north of W526
IIIA
5156
G2–3
5146
Combined into L5062
IIIB
5157
G–H2
-
Combined into L5048
IIIB
5158
H7
-
Topsoil removal and debris—unclear stratification
III–I
5159
O5
5178
Combined into L5155
IIIA
5160
G3
-
Surface between W530 and W501
IIIB
5161
H3
-
Floor within southern portion of Building K1
IIIB
5162
G7
5153
Surface east of W518 and south of W504
IIIB
5163
H7
5158
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
5164
O5
5155
Floor within Building K4
IIIB
5165
P5
5166
Surface
IIIB
5166
P5
5149
Combined into L5149
IIIA
5167
H3
5161
Combined into L5161
IIIB
5168
G6
5125
Infant burial below surface
IIIB
5169A
O4
5152B
Surface west of W529
IIIB
5169B
O4
5152B
Surface east of W529
IIIB
5170
O5
5164
Probe below surface level into thick debris accumulation
IV–IIIB
5171
O–P4
-
Balk removal
III–II
5172
K4
5098
Surface make-up
II
5173
N6
5082
Debris within oval installation
IIIB
5174
P6
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II
5175
H4
-
Floor within northern apse of Building K1
IIIB
5176
H4
-
Surface north of W520
IIIB
5177
O4
5169A
Surface make-up
IIIB
5178
O5
-
Floor within Building K4
II
5179
O5
5178
Combined into L5155
IIIA
5180
O5
5178
Debris above surface
III–II
5181
L5
5134
Probe below surface down to basal dune
IV–III
5182
O5
5180
Surface west of W524
IIIB–A
5183
M4
5110
Infant burial in storage jar
IIIB
5184
M4
5110
Matrix surrounding Burial 5183; surface make-up
IIIB
323
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Area L Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
6001
P3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6002
O4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6003
O3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6004
O2
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6005
N3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6006
N4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6007
M4
-
Topsoil removal in probe, dark brown debris
II(?)
6008
L3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6009
O3
6003
Surface and surface make-up south of W601
II
6010
K4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6011
O2
6004
Surface with dark brown debris south of W603
II
6012
O2
6004
Infant burial within ceramic vessel
Post-II(?)
6013
O3
6003
Surface with dark brown debris northeast of W627
II
6014
O3
6003
Surface with dark brown debris north of W601
II
6015
O2
6011
Surface make-up
II
6016
N4
6006
Combined into L6059
II
6017
P3
6001
Dark brown debris above surface
II(?)
6018
K4
6010
Dark brown debris
II(?)
6019
L3
6008
Surface with dark brown debris
II
6020
M4
6007
Surface
IIIA
6021
L4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris above surface
II(?)
6022
M3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6023
O4
6002
Combined into L6036
III
6024
K3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris around stones
II(?)
6025
L4
6021
Surface
II
6026
N4
6016
Combined into L6064
III
6027
M4
6020
Combined into L6082
IIIB
6028
O2
6015
Surface make-up and probe below level of W603
II
6029
O3
6009
Surface
III
6030
N4
6026
Surface north of W606
III
6031
M4
6027
Probe into debris of surface(?)
IV
6032
N4
6030
Surface make-up
III
6033
M4
6031
Probe into debris down to basal dune
IV
6034
L3
6019
Floor within Building L3
IIIB
6035
N3
6005
Debris above surface west of W604. Part of the locus combined into L6081
III–II
6036
O4
6023
Surface
III
6037
L3
6034
Floor make-up within Building L3
IIIB
6038
M3
6022
Dark brown debris above surface
II(?)
6039
L4
6025
Debris above floor within Building L3
IIIA(?)
6040
N5
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6041
K3
6024
Surface with dark brown debris
II
6042
J3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6043
I4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6044
N3
6035
Combined into L6081
III
324
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
6045
K–L4
6018
Floor within Building L3
IIIA
6046
K4
6018
Surface south of W605
IIIA
6047
N5
6040
Dark brown debris
II(?)
6048
N3
6035
Surface with dark brown debris
II
6049
L3
6037
Combined into L6178
IV
6050
P3
6017
Surface(?) with dark brown debris
II
6051
M3
6038
Surface with dark brown debris
II
6052
L4
6039
Combined into L6084
IIIA
6053
K4
6045
Combined into L6045
IIIA
6054
K4
6046
Combined into L6046
IIIA
6055
J3
6042
Debris
III(?)
6056
H3
-
Topsoil removal and debris
III–II (?)
6057
F3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6058
N3
6048
Mudbrick debris, combined into L6048
II
6059
N4
6016
Surface(?) with dark brown debris adjacent to W602
II
6060
N5
6047
Debris above surface
III(?)
6061
I4
6043
Debris
III(?)
6062
N4
6059
Combined into L6075
III
6063
K4
6054
Surface south of W605
IIIB
6064
N4
6060
Surface between W606 and W604
III
6065
L4
6052
Debris within pit on W609
IIIA(?)
6066
P3
6050
Dark brown debris
II(?)
6067
K3
6041
Surface make-up
II
6068
F3
6057
Debris above surface
III(?)
6069
N4
6062
Combined into L6075
III
6070
N3
6035
Surface make-up
III
6071
N5
6064
Combined into L6077
III
6072
K4
6063
Combined into L6046
IIIA
6073
F3
6068
Surface with ash
III(?)
6074
M4
6020
Surface and a portion of a stone pavement
IIIA
6075
N4
6096
Surface south of W606
III
6076
K4
6072
Combined into L6063
IIIB
6077
N5
6060
Surface east of W607
III
6078
N3
6070
Combined into L6070
III
6079
N3
6078
Upper portion of debris within Granary 6079
IV–III
6080
N5
6071
Surface(?) west of W607
III
6081
N3
6048
Surface
III
6082
M4
6074
Surface east of W609
IIIB
6083
N3
6058
Combined into L6081
III
6084
L4
6052
Floor within Building L3
IIIA
6085
M3
6051
Debris above surface
III(?)
6086
N3
6083
Combined into L6121
IV
6087
N5
6060
Surface east of W611
IV
6088
N–O4
-
Topsoil removal, definition of top of W602
II(?)
6089
M3
6085
Surface
III
325
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
6090
N5
6087
Surface make-up
IV
6091
N5
6077
Surface make-up
III
6092
K3
6067
Surface adjacent to W610 and northwest of W610
IIIA
6093
K–L3
6024
Floor within Building L3
IIIB
6094
L4
6084
Floor within Building L3
IIIB
6095
N5
6091
Combined into L6109
IV
6096
N3
6081
Mudbrick debris within upper portion of pit(?)
III
6097
K4
6053
Combined into L6045
IIIA
6098
N5
6095
Combined into L6109
IV
6099
N4
6075
Surface west of W611
IV
6100
N3
6081, 6096
Surface make-up
III
6101
K3
6092
Surface and surface make-up west of W637
IIIB
6102
F3
6073
Surface make-up(?)
III(?)
6103
N4
6099
Surface make-up west of W611
IV
6104
K3
6101
Surface, surface make-up and probe down to basal dune
IV
6105
L–M4
-
Balk removal
-
6106
K–L4
-
Upper portion of balk removal
II(?)
6107
G4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6108
F3
6102
Light brown loose debris on basal dune
IV(?)
6109
N5
6080
Surface to west of W611
IV
6110
I4
6061
Debris west of Building L2
IV–III
6111
L5
-
Topsoil removal
II(?)
6112
L4
6094
Probe below Stratum III level
IV
6113
J3
6055
Surface north of W614
IV
6114
L–M4
6105
Balk removal on W609
-
6115
L–K4
6106
Debris in balk removal
IIIA(?)
6116
N3
6096
Lower portion of debris within pit(?)
IV–III
6117
J3
6055
Combined into L6163
IV
6118
I3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6119
N4
6099
Combined into L6103
IV
6120
O2
6015
Child burial within storage jar below W603
II
6121
N3
6100
Surface between W615 and Granary 6079
IV
6122
L–M4
6114
Surface to east of W609
IIIA
6123
J4
-
Topsoil removal and surface(?) with dark brown debris
II(?)
6124
G4
6107
Dark brown debris
II(?)
6125
E4
-
Topsoil removal and debris
III–II(?)
6126
K3
6092
Surface make-up northwest and adjacent to W610
IIIA
6127
H3
6056
Probe into debris—unclear stratification
IV–III(?)
6128
K3
6126
Surface north of W613
IV
6129
I4
6061
Combined into L6134
IV
6130
I4
6110
Surface west of W616
IV
6131
G4
6124
Brown debris
III(?)
6132
N3
6079
Debris in probe down to base of Granary 6079
IV–III
6133
D3
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris of unclear stratification
III–II
326
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
6134
I4
6129
Floor within Building L1
IV
6135
G4
6131
Light brown loose debris above basal dune
IV(?)
6136
E4
6125
Debris—unclear stratification
III–II(?)
6137
I4
6134
Probe into floor make-up within Building L1 down to basal dune
IV
6138
L3
6049
Dark brown debris east of W612
II
6139
I3
6118
Debris above surface
III–II
6140
H3
6127
Debris—unclear stratification
V–IV(?)
6141
E4
6136
Debris—unclear stratification
IV–III(?)
6142
D3
6133
Mixed debris on basal dune
IV–III (?)
6143
E4
6141
Debris on basal dune
IV(?)
6144
H3
6140
Probe into basal dune
V–IV(?)
6145
G4
6135
Light brown loose debris on basal dune—unclear stratification
IV(?)
6146
L5
6111
Debris above surface
IIIA(?)
6147
M3
6089
Surface make-up
III
6148
J4
6123
Surface east of W631
III
6149
C4
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris of unclear stratification
III–II(?)
6150
I4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6151
L3
6138
Combined into L6093
IIIB
6152
I3
6139
Surface north of W617
IV
6153
I3
6139
Surface northwest of W636
III
6154
M3
6147
Debris—unclear stratification
IV–III
6155
S4
-
Topsoil removal and brown debris
III(?)
6156
R3
-
Topsoil removal and surface(?) with dark brown debris
II(?)
6157
Q4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6158
J4
6148
Debris within Building L2
III
6159
C4
-
Mixed debris on basal dune—unclear stratification
IV–III(?)
6160
K5
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6161
L5
6146
Surface southeast of W618
IIIA
6162
L5
6146
Floor within Building L3
IIIB
6163
J3
6117
Floor within Building L1
IV
6164
M2
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6165
T3
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6166
I4
6150
Floor within Building L2
III
6167
J3
6163
Floor make-up within Building L1down to basal dune
IV
6168
L5
6161
Surface southeast of W618
IIIB
6169
J4
6148
Floor within Building L1
IV
6170
K–L4
6053
Floor within Building L3
IIIB
6171
K5
6160
Surface southwest of W622
IIIA
6172
I4
6150
Combined into L6179
III
6173
I3
6153
Surface west of W614 and adjacent to W617
IV
6174
I4
6166
Surface west of W616
IV
6175
M2
6164
Debris on W620
III
6176
T3
6165
Brown debris—unclear stratification
III(?)
327
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
6177
K5
6171
Surface west of W624
IIIB
6178
K3
6093
Surface southeast of W620
IV
6179
I4
6172
Surface west of W619
III
6180
L3
6151
Combined into L6178
IV
6181
K–L3
6151
Combined into L6178
IV
6182
M2
6175
Surface north of W620
IV
6183
I4
6179
Surface make-up west of W619
III
6184
J–K3
-
Upper portion of balk removal
III–II
6185
K4–5
-
Upper portion of balk removal
-
6186
M2
6182
Surface make-up and probe down to basal dune
IV
6187
K4–5
6185
Debris west of W622
IIIA(?)
6188
K3
W610
Debris below W610 and west of W620 down to basal dune
IV(?)
6189
M3
6147
Mudbrick debris
III(?)
6190
L2
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6191
J4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6192
K–L4
-
Balk removal
-
6193
U4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris
II(?)
6194
S4
6155
Brown debris on basal dune—unclear stratification
III(?)
6195
R3
6156
Combined into L6156
II(?)
6196
Q4
6157
Debris—unclear stratification
III(?)
6197
-
-
Cancelled
-
6198
K4–5
6192
Surface west of W624
IIIB
6199
K–L5
-
Upper portion of balk removal
II(?)
6200
A4
-
Topsoil removal and dark brown debris; see Southern Area H, Sq E18
II(?)
6201
R3
6195
Surface on basal dune north of W623
III(?)
6202
L2
6190
Surface north of W628
III
6203
R3
6195
Surface and surface make-up on basal dune south of W623
III(?)
6204
U4
6193
Brown debris on basal dune—unclear stratification
III(?)
6205
J4
6191
Debris above surface
III–II
6206
K–L5
6199
Debris in balk removal
IIIA(?)
6207
L2
6202
Surface north of W620
IV
6208
T3
6176
Brown debris on basal dune—unclear stratification
III(?)
6209
V3
-
Topsoil removal
-
6210
K–L5
6206
Surface south of W618 and W624
IIIB
6211
L2–3
-
Balk removal, dark brown debris on W628
II(?)
6212
L5
6146
Combined into L6210
III
6213
L2–3
6211
Balk removal, definition of W628
III(?)
6214
L2–3
6213
Mixed debris
IV–III
6215
A4
6200
Surface with dark brown debris; see southern Area H, Sq E18
II
6216
A4
6215
Combined into L6217; see Southern Area H, Sq E18
IIIA
6217
A4
6216
Surface north of W408; see Southern Area H, Sq E18
IIIA
6218
A4
6216
Debris to south of W408; see Southern Area H, Sq E18
III
328
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
6219
J4
6205
Surface east of W631
III
6220
J4
6205
Surface east of W629
IV
6221
N3
6100
Surface with mudbrick debris between Granary 6079 and W615
IV
6222
J–K3
6184
Combined into L6128
IV
6223
A4
6217
Surface north of W408; see Southern Area H, Sq E18
IIIB
6224
K4
6076
Surface make-up south of W605
IIIB
6225
M3
6189
Mudbrick debris
IV(?)
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
7000
D8
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7001
B8
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7002
B7
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7003
C7
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7004
D7
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7005
C9
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7006
C8
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7007
B8
7001
Surface
IIIA
7008
B8
7001
Combined into L7007
IIIA
7009
C8
7006
Mudbrick debris
III–II)?(
7010
D8
-
Surface
IIIA
7011
C9
7005
Surface
IIIA
7012
D7
7004
Surface
IIIA
7013
C9
7011
Surface make-up
IIIA
7014
B8
7000
Combined into L7007
IIIA
7015
C9
7013
Surface
IIIB
7016
D7
7012
Surface make-up
IIIA
7017
B8
7008
Surface make-up
IIIA
7018
D8
7010
Surface make-up
IIIA
7019
D8
7018
Surface
IIIB
7020
D7
7016
Combined into L7016
IIIA
7021
B8
7017
Combined into L7017
IIIA
7022
C8
7009
Surface north of W703
IIIA
7023
C8
7009
Surface south of W703
IIIA
7024
C9
7015
Surface
IIIB
7025
B8
7021
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB
7026
C9
7024
Surface
IV
7027
D8
7019
Combined into L7019
IIIB
7028
D8
7027
Surface make-up
IIIB
7029
C9
7026
Surface make-up
IV
7030
D7
7020
Surface south of W709
IIIB
7031
D8
7028
Debris above surface
IV–IIIB
7032
C8
7009
Surface northwest of W706
IIIA
7033
C7
7003
Surface
IIIA
Area M
329
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
7034
C6
-
Topsoil removal and surface
IIIA)?(
7035
C7
7033
Surface make-up
IIIA
7036
D8
7031
Surface south of W707
IVA
7037
C8
7032
Surface make-up
IIIA
7038
D8
7036
Combined into L7036
IVA
7039
D7
7020
Surface south of W704
IIIB
7040
D8
7036
Combined into L7036
IVA
7041
C7
7035
Combined into L7035
IIIA
7042
B8
7029
Surface
IV
7043
D8
7040, 7038
Surface make-up
IVA
7044
B8
7042
Combined into L7042
IV
7045
D7
7020
Surface north of W704 and W709
IIIB
7046
C8
7037
Surface
IIIB
7047
C7
7041
Surface
IIIB)?(
7048
C6
7034
Surface east of Granary W710
IIIB
7049
D7
7045
Surface make-up
IIIB
7050
C8
7032
Combined into L7032
IIIA
7051
C8
7046
Combined into L7046
IIIB
7052
C8
7046, 7051, 7050
Surface make-up
IIIB
7053
C7
7047
Surface
IIIB
7054
C7
7047
Combined into L7053
IIIB
7055
B7
7002
Surface and surface make-up
IIIA
7056
D7
7039
Surface make-up
IIIB
7057
C8
7052
Combined into L7052
IIIB
7058
D7
7056
Combined into L7056
IIIB
7059
C8
7037, 7046
Child burial covered with ceramic fragments
IIIA
7060
C8
7057
Combined into L7076
IVA
7061
C7
7053, 7054
Debris above surface
IV–IIIB
7062
C8
7052, 7057
Combined into L7052
IIIB
7063
C8
7062
Combined into L7052
IIIB
7064
D7
7058
Combined into L7075
IV
7065
C7
7053, 7054
Debris above surface
IV–IIIB
7066
C6
7048
Surface make-up
IIIB
7067
C7
7065
Debris above surface west of W705
IV)?(
7068
C6
7048
Floor within Granary 7068
IIIB
7069
C8
7060, 7063
Combined into L7076
IVA
7070
D10
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II–I
7071
C10
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II–I
7072
B10
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
330
AMIR GOLANI
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
7073
C11
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II–I
7074
B11
-
Topsoil removal
II)?(
7075
D7
7064
Surface and surface make-up east of W708
IV
7076
C8
7069, 7063, 7103
Surface between W707, W712 and W714
IVA
7077
C7
7047
Combined into L7047
IIIB)?(
7078
C8
7076
Surface make-up
IVA
7079
D7
7049
Combined into L7049
IIIB
7080
D8
7010
Combined into L7018
IIIA
7081
D7
7079
Debris within installation
IIIB
7082
C6
7066
Floor within Building M1
IV
7083
D7
7079
Surface outside and below installation; combined into L7075
IV
7084
B7
7055
Surface
IIIB
7085
C7
7061
Combined into L7118
IVA
7086
C8
7022
Surface make-up
IIIA
7087
D9
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7088
C6
7082
Combined into L7082
IV
7089
C8
7086
Combined into L7046
IIIB
7090
C8
7089
Combined into L7046
IIIB
7091
C6
7066
Combined into L7094
IV
7092
C8
7023
Surface make-up
IIIA
7093
C8
7092
Mudbrick debris combined into L7092
IIIA
7094
C6
7091
Surface and surface make-up; equals L218 in Area B
IV
7095
C6
7066
Combined into L7094
IV
7096
C8
7093
Surface; equals L7046
IIIB
7097
D8
7080
Surface
IIIB
7098
C7
7077
Surface
IIIB
7099
B7
7084
Surface and surface make-up
IV
7100
C8
7006, 7009
Dismantlement of W703
IIIA
7101
C8
7100
Surface make-up and surface below W703
IIIB–A
7102
C8
7101
Combined into L7052
IIIB
7103
C8
7101
Surface
IVB
7104
C6
7066
Surface west of W705
IV
7105
D8
7097
Surface make-up
IIIB
7106
D8
7105
Surface
IVA
7107
D11
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II–I)?(
7108
C12
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7109
B12
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
II)?(
7110
C13
-
Topsoil removal and surface(?)
IIIA)?(
7111
B13
-
Topsoil removal and debris above surface
III–II
7112
D13
-
Topsoil removal and mixed debris
III–II)?(
7113
D8
7106
Surface to south of W707
IVB
7114
C7
7098
Surface make-up
IIIB
7115
C10
7071
Debris below topsoil
III–II(?)
331
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Locus
Square
Locus Above
Description
Stratum
7116
C8
7078
Surface south of W707 and below W714
IVB
7117
B10
-
Debris above surface
IIIA)?(
7118
C7
7114
Floor within Building M1
IVA
7119
D8
-
Combined into L7106
IVA
7120
D9
7087
Floor within Granary 7126
IIIA
7121
C8
7103
Combined into L7103
IVB
7122
D9
7087
Surface surrounding Granary 7126
IIIA
7123
C10
7115
Debris—unclear stratification
IIIA)?(
7124
D10
7070
Debris below topsoil
III–II
7125
D11
7107
Debris below topsoil; exposure of top of W724 and W725
III)?(
7126
D9
7120
Floor with light gray debris within Granary 7126
IIIB
7127
B11
7074
Debris below topsoil
III–II
7128
C10
7123
Mudbrick debris above surface
IIIB)?(
7129
D9
7122
Surface
IIIB
7130
C12
7108
Surface(?)
IIIA)?(
7131
B10
7117
Surface and surface make-up south of W715
IIIB
7132
B11
7127
Debris above surface
IIIA)?(
7133
C7
7118, 7085
Floor make-up within Building M1
IVA
7134
D9
7129
Surface and surface make-up
IV–III
7135
B11
7127
Combined into L7132
IIIA)?(
7136
D8
7106
Combined into L7106
IVA
7137
C8
7102
Surface make-up north of W707
IV–IIIB
7138
B10
-
Surface and surface make-up north of W715
IIIB
7139
C7
7133
Floor within Building M1
IVB
7140
C10
7128
Surface
IIIB
7141
C11
7073
Surface
IIIB
7142
B11
7132, 7135
Surface west of W716
IIIA
7143
C12
7108
Surface and surface make-up
IIIB)?(
7144
C13
7110
Surface
IIIB)?(
7145
C14
4162
Surface
IIIB
7146
B8
7014
Combined into L7007
IIIA
7147
B12
7109
Surface(?)
IIIA)?(
7148
C11
7141
Surface and surface make-up north of W717
IV
7149
D9
7134
Surface
IV
7150
C13
7144
Debris
IV)?(
7151
C 13
7144
Combined into L7150
IV)?(
7152
C12
7143
Surface and surface make-up north of W719
IV
7153
C12
7143
Surface and surface make-up south of W719
IV
7154
B11
7142
Surface and surface make-up west of W716
IIIB
7155
B12
7147
Surface west of W716
IIIB
7156
B11
7154
Surface(?)
IV
7157
D9
7149
Surface and surface make-up
IV
7158
-
-
Unused locus number
-
7159
D9
7126
Surface and surface make-up
IV
332
AMIR GOLANI
Wall List Area A Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
1
E32–33
Stone
-
-
20 × 10 × 15
Outer(?( wall of Structure A1
III)?(
2
B–C/27– 28
Stone and mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 25 × 10 30 × 25 × 10
20 × 10 × 15
Granary wall
III
3
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
4
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
5
E33
Stone
-
-
20 × 10 × 15
Outer (?) wall of Structure A1
III)?(
6
B–C27
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 25 × 10 30 × 20 × 10
30 × 20 × 18 20 × 17 × 15
Courtyard wall
III
7
B27–29
Stone and mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
30 × 20 × 20 20 × 15 × 17
Courtyard wall
III
8
B–C28
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 25 × 10 30 × 25 × 10
-
Partition wall within compound
III
9
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
10
D21–22
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Granary wall(?)
IIIB
11
B–C27
Mudbrick
Brown to orangebrown
20 × 25 × 10 20 × 50 × 10
-
Silo wall
IV
301
D29
Stone and mudbrick(?)
-
-
30 × 25 × 20 17 × 15 × 15
Courtyard and wall of Building A2
III
302
D–E27
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 25 × 10
-
Courtyard wall
III
303
D29
Stone
-
-
21 × 13 × 15 16 × 12 × 10
Outer(?) wall of Building A2
II
304
C30
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
46 × 25 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building A2
III
305
E29
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
48 × 26 × 10
-
Unclear
III
306
D27
Mudbrick
Dark gray
Unclear
-
Partition wall within courtyard
III
307
E29
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
-
-
Unclear
III
308
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
309
C–D29
Stone
-
-
16 × 13 × 11 25 × 20 × 15
Outer building(?) wall
II
310
E27–29
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 25 × 10 25 × 15 × 10
40 × 27 × 18 25 × 20 × 15
Courtyard wall
III
311
C26
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
20 × 10 × 10
-
Unclear; in Northern Area H
III
333
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
312
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
313
E26
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
27 × 10 × 10
-
Unclear; in Northern Area H
III
314
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
315
D28
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
25 × 27 × 10 28 × 17 × 10
-
Silo wall
IV
316
E–D/29– 30
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 30 × 10
Outer wall of Building A2
III
317
B–C29
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 20 × 10
-
Courtyard wall
III
318
D31
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
25 × 20 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building A2
III
319
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
320
B25
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
20 × 15 × 10
-
In Northern Area H
III
321
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
322
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
323
B25
Mudbrick
Light brown
40 × 30 × 10
-
Continuation of W401; in Northern Area H
IV
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
20
C–D5, D6
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 25 × 12 24 × 20 × 10
20 × 13 × 10 30 × 25 × 15
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
21
E6
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 25 × 12 24 × 20 × 10
20 × 13 × 10 30 × 25 × 15
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
22
D5
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
50 × 30 × 10
-
Partition wall within compound
IIIA
23 (=708)
D6
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
Unclear
-
Wall of Building M1; in Area M
IV
24
D6
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
53 × 22 × 10 35 × 22 × 10
-
Wall of Building M1; in Area M
IV
25
B9
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
18 × 17 × 12
-
Silo(?) wall; in Area M
III
26
C5
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
15 × 10 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
27
C5
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
15 × 10 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
28
F4–6
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
44 × 23 × 12 27 × 20 × 11
35 × 20 × 15 20 × 14 × 11
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
29
E6
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
Unclear
-
Unclear
IV
30
C–D2
Stone
-
-
58 × 24 × 15 10 × 8 × 5
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
31
C4
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
15 × 13 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IIIA
Area B
334
AMIR GOLANI
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
32
D2
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Screen(?) wall
IIIB
33
F4
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Screen(?) wall
IIIB
34
E5
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Screen(?) wall
IIIB
35
D2
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Partition wall within compound
IIIB
36
E–F2
Stone
-
-
36 × 16 × 12 15 × 14 × 5
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
37
C3
Mudbrick
Reddish brown
30 × 24 × 10 17 × 15 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IIIA
38
F3
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
23 × 19 × 10
48 × 25 × 8 12 × 9 × 7
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
39
F3
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
25 × 20 × 10
-
Partition wall within compound
IIIB
40
D5–6
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 25 × 10
-
Partition wall within compound
IIIB–A
41
C–D/3–4
Mudbrick
Burnt
Unclear
-
Installation wall
IIIB–A
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
41
D8
Stone
-
-
15 × 12 × 9 30 × 30 × 15
Building(?) wall
I
42
D4
Compacted earth, plaster and shells
-
-
-
Robber trench(?)
(?)
43
E5
Stone, compacted earth, plaster and shells
-
-
16 × 14 × 9 12 × 12 × 10
Robber trench(?)
I
44
E8
Stone
-
-
34 × 24 × 13
Building(?) wall
I
45
D7–8
Stone
-
-
16 × 10 × 8
Building(?) wall
I
Area C
46
E5
Stone
-
-
10 × 8 × 6
Building(?) wall
I
47
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
48
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
49
E8
Compacted earth and plaster
-
-
5×5×5
Robber trench(?)
I
335
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Area D Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
50
D11
Stone
-
-
-
Building wall
II
51
C11
Stone
-
-
-
Wall of Structure D7
IIIB–A
52
C–D/10– 11
Stone
-
-
-
Well shaft
I
53
D–C11
Stone
-
-
-
Building(?) wall
II
54
E18
Mudbrick
Brown cream-gray
40 × 30 × 10
-
Granary(?) wall
IIIB(?)
55
D10
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Structure D7
IIIA
56
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
57
D11
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
40 × 30 × 10
-
Building(?) wall
II
58
Orange-brown
30 × 25 × 10
-
Building(?) wall
IIIB–A
-
-
Unclear
II
D–C11
Mudbrick
120
D3
Stone
121
E–F4
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
80 × 30 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D4
III–II
122
D4
Stone
-
-
-
Unclear
II
123
D3
Stone
-
-
-
Unclear
II
124
D–E1
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
35 × 15 × 10
-
Bench(?) within Structure D3
IIIB–A
125
F4
Stone
-
-
Pavement of installation
II
126
H4
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
30 × 50 × 10
-
Outer(?) wall of Structure D9
IIIA
127
H4
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
30 × 45 × 10
-
Outer(?) wall of Structure D9
IIIA
128
H4
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
30 × 45 × 10
-
Wall of Structure D9
IIIA
129
H5
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
30 × 45 × 10
-
Room(?) wall of Structure D9
IIIA
130
H5
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
30 × 45 × 10
-
Wall of Structure D9
IIIA
131
H5
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
Unclear
-
Granary
IIIA
132
H5
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
Unclear
-
Combined into W131
IIIA
133
H5
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
Unclear
-
Combined into W131
IIIA
134
H5
Stone
-
-
-
Unclear
II
135
H4
Stone
-
-
-
Wall of Structure D5
IIIB
136
G4
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
Unclear
-
Wall of Structure D4(?)
IIIB–A
137
G3
Stone
-
-
-
Unclear
II
138
F–G3
Mudbrick
Brown
60 × 30 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D4
IIIB–A
139
F4
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
30 × 30 × 10
-
Wall of Structure D4
III–II
140
F3–4
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
60 × 30 × 10
-
Wall of Structure D4
IIIA
336
AMIR GOLANI
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
141
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
142
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
143
F3
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
40 × 25 × 10
-
Wall of Structure D4(?)
IIIB
144
E2
Stone
-
-
-
Building wall
II
145
E2
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
Unclear
-
Unclear
IIIA
146
D1
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
50 × 50 × 10 80 × 40 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D3
IIIB–A
147
D–E1
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
75 × 30 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D3
IIIB–A
148
E1
Stone(?) and mudbrick
Light brown
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Structure D1
IV
149
D3–4
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
40 × 35 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D4
IIIB–A
150
E1–2
Stone(?) and mudbrick
Light brown
Unclear
-
Partition wall(?) within Structure D1
IV
151
E2
Stone(?) and mudbrick
Light brown
70 × 30 × 10(?) 60 × 40 × 10(?)
-
Outer wall of Structure D1
IV
152
E5
Mudbrick
Light brown
40 × 30 × 10
-
Unclear
IV
153
F4
Stone
-
-
-
Wall of Structure D4(?)
IIIB
154
E1–2
Stone(?) and mudbrick
Light brown
70 × 30 × 10 60 × 40 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D1
IV
155
G4
Stone and mudbrick
Cream-gray
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Structure D5(?)
IIIB
156
C10, D4–9
Stone and mudbrick
Orange-brown
40 × 65 × 10 38 × 62 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IV–III
157
E3
Stone
-
-
-
Outer (?) wall of Structure D4
IIIA
158
E3
Stone
-
-
-
Outer (?) wall of Structure D4
IIIA
159
F3
Stone and mudbrick
Brown
45 × 40 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D2.
IV
160
C8–9, D9
Stone and mudbrick
Light cream-gray and orange-brown
40 × 30 × 10 30 × 30 × 10
-
Building D8
IIIB–A
161
E10
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Structure D7, continuation of W55
IIIA
162
E6
Stone
-
-
-
Installation(?)
II
163
E7–8
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
60 × 30 × 10 50 × 30 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D6
IIIA
164
E–F8
Mudbrick and stone
Brown-gray
60 × 30 × 10 50 × 30 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D6
IIIA
165
E6
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
Unclear
-
Wall of Structure D6(?)
IIIA
337
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
166
E–F8
Stone
-
-
-
Wall of installation(?)
IIIA(?)
167
E7–8
Mudbrick
Light brown
Unclear
-
Enclosure(?) wall
IV
168
E10
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
60 × 40 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D7
IIIB–A
169
E8, G–H9
Stone and mudbrick
Light cream-gray
-
-
Retaining(?) wall of Structure D6
IIIB–A
170
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
171
F10
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
60 × 40 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIA
172
E12
Stone and mudbrick
Orange-brown
60 × 40 × 10
-
Outer wall of Structure D7
IIIB–A
173
E6
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
Unclear
-
Unclear
IIIA
174
G–H9
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
40 × 25 × 10 30 × 25 × 10
-
Outer(?) wall of Structure D6
IIIA
175
G6
Stone
-
-
-
Unclear
II
176
G–H9
Mudbrick and stone
Brown
50 × 30 × 10 40 × 30 × 10
-
Wall of Structure D6
IIIB
177
G6
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
Unclear
-
Unclear
IIIA
178
H9
Stone and mudbrick
Light brown
60 × 30 × 10
-
Building(?) wall
IV
179
H9
Stone and mudbrick
Light cream-gray
50 × 30 × 10 40 × 30 × 10
-
Retaining(?) wall of Structure D6
IIIB–A
180
G6
Mudbrick
Brown-gray
70 × 40 × 10 40 × 40 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIA
181
D8–9
Stone
-
Unclear
-
Building(?) wall
IV
182
E6
Stone
-
Unclear
-
Building(?) wall
IV
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
63
K21
Stone
-
-
-
Unclear
Unclear
64
K21
Stone
-
-
-
Unclear
Unclear
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
81
G–H4
Stone
-
-
-
Boundary wall
IIIB–A
82
F2–3
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Building G1
IV–IIIA
83
F/34
Mudbrick
Light cream-brown with many white calcite concretions
30–40 × 20–25 × 5–8
-
Granary wall
IIIB
84
H2–3
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Building G2
IV–IIIB
85
E2
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Building G1
IV–IIIA
Area E
Area G
338 Wall
AMIR GOLANI
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
86
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
87
G2
Mudbrick
Dark gray
20 × 30 × 6
-
Partition(?) wall
IIIA
88
G/H2
Mudbrick
Light cream-brown with many white calcite concretions
25–30 × 50– 55 × 7–10
-
Boundary wall
IIIB–A
89
D2
Mudbrick
Light brown
40–35 × 25–20 × 10
-
Granary wall
IV–III
90
J12
Stone foundation
-
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building G3
IV–IIIA
91
O–P/3–4
Mudbrick
Light brown
40–35 × 25–20 × 10
-
Granary wall
IV– IIIB(?)
92
I2–3
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Building G2
IV–IIIB
93
K2
Stone
-
-
-
Wall of Building G3(?)
IIIA
94
J–K2
Stone foundation
-
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building G3
IV–IIIA
95
L2
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Building G3, addition
IIIB–A
96
H3
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Building G2
IV–IIIB
97
O–P2
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Structure G4
IV–IIIB
98
K–L1
Stone foundation
-
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building G3
IV–IIIA
99
P2
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Structure G4
IV–IIIB
100
N–P5, P4
Stone
-
-
-
Enclosure wall (?)
III(?)
101
M–P5, P4, Q3
Mudbrick
Light brown
25 × 45–50 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IV
102
L1
Stone
-
-
-
Outer wall of Building G3, addition
IIIB–A
103
F3–4
Mudbrick
Light brown
20–25 × 25–30 × 10
-
Silo wall
IV
104
H2
Mudbrick
Light brown
Unclear
-
Partition wall within Building G2
IIIB
105
I3
Stone
-
-
-
Bench(?) outside and adjacent to Building G2
IV–IIIB
106
E2
Stone and mudbrick
Light brown
20–25 × 25–30 × 10
-
Partition wall within Building G1
IV–IIIA
339
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Area H Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
400
C22
Mudbrick
Red-brown
30 × 15 × 10
-
Unclear
II
401
B24
Mudbrick
Light brown
30 × 16 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building H1
IV
402
D21–22
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
28 × 20 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIA
403
C17–18
Mudbrick and Stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
35 × 25 × 10
15 × 10 × 10
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
404
C18
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
60 × 30 × 10
-
Enclosure wall(?)
IIIA
405
C17–18
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
35 × 25 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
406
B–C18
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
37 × 30 × 10
-
Silo wall
IIIB
407
B20
Mudbrick
Light Brown
20 × 15 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIA
408
D–E18
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
35 × 25 × 10
20 × 10 × 10
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
409
C–D/16– 17
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
35 × 25 × 10
15 × 25 × 10
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
410
C16
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
60 × 25 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
411
B17
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
Unclear
-
Unclear
IIIB
412
D18
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 25 × 10
10 × 10 × 10
Partition wall within compound
IIIB–A
413
B15–16
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
35 × 25 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
414
D16
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 25 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
415
B16
Stone
-
-
50 × 40 × 20
Unclear
IIIA
416
B19
Mudbrick
Brown
28 × 18 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIA
417
B19
Mudbrick
Brown
28 × 18 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIA
418
B19
Mudbrick
Brown
Unclear
-
Unclear
IIIA
419
C16
Stone
-
-
30 × 25 × 20 15 × 10 × 10
Unclear
IIIA
420
B19
Mudbrick
Brown
25 × 20 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIA
421
B24
Mudbrick
Light brown
30 × 16 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building H1(?)
IV
422
D17
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 25 × 10
10 × 10 × 10
Partition wall within compound
IIIB–A
340
AMIR GOLANI
Area I Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
208
I5–4
Stone
-
-
33 × 26 × 13 13 × 10 × 15 26 × 16 × 17
Courtyard and Structure I1 wall
III
210
I5
Stone
-
-
35 × 9 × 15 14 × 16 × 15
Outer (?) wall of Structure I1
III
211
H5
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 40 × 10
-
Outer (?) wall of Structure I1
III
213
H3–4
Stone
-
-
24 × 15 × 15 47 × 25 × 20
Courtyard wall
III
214
J2–4
Stone
-
-
26 × 20 × 20 17 × 10 × 13
Courtyard wall
III
215
H4–5
Mudbrick
Light brown-gray
24 × 50 × 10
-
Enclosure(?) wall
IV
216
J4
Stone
-
-
25 × 18 × 16 40 × 17 × 20
Courtyard wall
III
217
I–J3
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
17 × 21 × 10
32 × 20 × 15
Partition wall within courtyard
III
218
J4
Stone
-
-
32 × 36 × 30 14 × 15 × 13
Partition wall within courtyard
III
219
H5
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
33 × 27 × 10
-
Unclear
III
220
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
221
H5
Stone
-
-
16 × 20 × 15 35 × 12 × 15
Unclear
IV
222
I2–3
Stone
-
-
32 × 20 × 15
Partition wall within courtyard
III
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
201
G19–20
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 18 × 10
-
Granary wall
IIIA
202
E13–14
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
20 × 12 × 10
-
Granary wall
IIIA
203
F–G12
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Granary(?) wall
IIIA
204
E–F13
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
26 × 10 × 10
-
Granary wall
IIIA
205
E–F11
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
50 × 40 × 10
30 × 20 × 20 50 × 30 × 20
Enclosure wall
IIIA
206
F16–17
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
20 × 70 × 10 23 × 24 × 10
-
Granary wall
IIIA
Area J
341
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
207
E–F14
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
27 × 25 × 20
Enclosure wall
IIIA
209
F11–12
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
20 × 10 × 20 25 × 10 × 20
Unclear
IIIB
212
G12
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
15 × 9 × 10
Enclosure wall
IIIA
223
E16–17
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Enclosure wall
IIIA
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
501
G–K3
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
50 × 30 × 10
30 × 20 × 20 15 × 15 × 15
Enclosure wall
IIIB
502
H–I2
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
50 × 30 × 10
30 × 20 × 20 15 × 15 × 12
Wall of Structure K3(?)
IIIB
503
K2
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
45 × 30 × 10
-
Granary wall
IIIB
504
G7
Stone
-
-
15 × 15 × 10
Enclosure wall
IIIB
505
G3
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
20 × 15 × 10
-
Screen wall
IIIB
506
H–L3
Mudbrick and stone
Light brown
Unclear
30 × 20 × 20 20 × 20 × 15
Enclosure wall
IIIB
507
K3
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Enclosure wall
IIIB
508
I–J3
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building K2
IIIB
509
I1
Stone
-
-
15 × 15 × 14
Outer wall of Structure K3(?)
IIIB
510
N6
Stone
-
-
55 × 40 × 15
Wall of Building K4(?), unclear
II
511
G3
Stone
-
-
25 × 20 × 20 15 × 15 × 13
Unclear
IIIA
512
P5 north balk
Mudbrick
-
Unclear
-
Wall of Building K4(?)
IIIA
513
N–P4
Stone
-
-
30 × 20 × 15 15 × 15 × 13
Outer(?) wall of Building K4
II
514
H1
Stone
-
-
30 × 15 × 15 15 × 15 × 12
Outer wall of Structure K3(?)
IIIB
515
K5
Stone
-
-
30 × 20 × 15 20 × 15 × 13
Outer(?) wall of Structure K5
II
516
N6
Stone
-
-
30 × 20 × 15 20 × 15 × 13
Outer(?) wall of Building K4(?)
II
Area K
342
AMIR GOLANI
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
517
K5–6
Stone
-
-
30 × 20 × 15 20 × 15 × 13
Outer(?) wall of Structure K5
II
518
G4–7
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
25 × 15 × 15 15 × 15 × 10
Enclosure wall
IIIB
519
N4–5
Mudbrick
Brown
Unclear
-
-
IIIB
520
G–H/4–5
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
60 × 40 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building K1
IIIB
521
G6
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray
Unclear
-
Unclear
IIIA
522
M5
Stone
-
-
20 × 15 × 12 15 × 10 × 10
Building(?) wall
II
523
O5
Stone
-
-
15 × 10 × 10
Partition(?) wall within Building K4
II
524
O5
Stone
-
-
50 × 30 × 25 20 × 20 × 17
Building K4 wall
IIIB
525
P4–5
Stone
-
-
30 × 25 × 20
Wall of Building K4
IIIA
526
O5
Stone
-
-
30 × 25 × 25
Wall of Building K4
IIIA
527
P4–5
Mudbrick and stone
Brown
20 × 15 × 10
20 × 20 × 20
Outer(?) wall of Building K4
IIIB
528
N–P4
Stone
-
-
35 × 25 × 15 15 × 15 × 10
Outer wall of Building K4
IIIB–A
529
O4
Mudbrick
Brown
20 × 25 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
530
G–H3
Mudbrick and stone
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
Unclear
25 × 20 × 15 15 × 15 × 13
Outer wall of Building K1
IIIB
531
O5
Stone
-
-
30 × 20 × 15 20 × 15 × 15
Partition wall within Building K4
IIIB
532
N6
Stone
-
-
35 × 25 × 15 20 × 20 × 15
Installation
IIIB
533
P4–5
Stone
-
-
25 × 20 × 20 20 × 15 × 15
Wall of Building K4
IIIA
534
O5
Stone
-
-
30 × 24 × 20 20 × 15 × 15
Wall of Building K4
IIIA
535
P5
Stone
-
-
30 × 20 × 15 20 × 15 × 13
Outer(?) wall of Building K4
II
536
O–P5
Stone
-
-
30 × 25 × 20
Wall of Building K4
IIIA
537
O–P4
Stone
-
-
25 × 20 × 15 20 × 15 × 15
Outer(?) wall of Building K4
II
538
O4–5
Stone
-
-
30 × 25 × 20
Wall of Building K4
IIIA
539
G3–4
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray
Unclear
-
Unclear
IIIA
540
N–04
Stone
-
-
35 × 25 × 15 15 × 15 × 10
Outer(?) wall of Building K4
IIIA
343
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Area L Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
601
O3
Stone
-
-
10 × 8 × 10 15 × 13 × 11
Unclear
II
602
N–O4
Stone
-
-
30 × 28 × 25 18 × 12 × 15
Unclear
II
603
O2
Stone
-
-
44 × 28 × 35 24 × 20 × 22
Unclear
II
604
N3–4
Stone and mudbrick
-
Unclear
46 × 38 × 24 15 × 13 × 14
Unclear
IIIB
605A
K4
Stone
-
-
30 × 26 × 20 56 × 24 × 17
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIA
605B
K4
Mudbrick
Dark Brown
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIB
606
N4
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
20 × 16 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
607
N5
Stone
-
-
28 × 30 × 12 13 × 15 × 10
Unclear
IIIB
608
N3
Mudbrick
Light brown
22 × 18 × 10
-
Granary wall
IV–III
609
L–M4
Mudbrick
Dark brown
30 × 32 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIB–A
610
K3
Stone
-
-
38 × 20 × 17 17 × 12 × 11
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIA
611
N4–5
Mudbrick
Light brown with white chips
30 × 26 × 10 21 × 22 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IV
612
K3
Stone
-
-
32 × 20 × 25 40 × 33 × 37
Unclear
II
613
K3
Mudbrick and stone
Light brown with white chips
Unclear
30 × 25 × 20 15 × 11 × 13
Enclosure wall
IV
614
J3–4
Mudbrick and Stone
Light brown with white chips
13 × 15 × 17
24 × 18 × 10 13 × 10 × 10
Outer wall of Building L1
IV
615
N3
Mudbrick and stone
Light brown with white chips
Unclear
27 × 15 × 20 20 × 15 × 8
Enclosure wall
IV
616
I4
Stone
-
-
31 × 27 × 10 14 × 13 × 10
Outer wall of Building L1
IV
617
I3
Mudbrick on stone foundation
Light brown with white chips
20 × 22 × 10
30 × 20 × 17 12 × 14 × 10
Enclosure wall
IV
618
L5
Mudbrick
Dark brown
25 × 12 × 10 30 × 15 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIB–A
619
I3–4
Mudbrick
Dark brown
34 × 15 × 10 52 × 20 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building L2
IIIB
620
K–L3, L– M2
Mudbrick and stone
Light brown with white chips
Unclear
18 × 12 × 13 35 × 15 × 30
Enclosure wall
IV
621
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
622
K4–5
Stone
-
-
40 × 17 × 19 26 × 15 × 15
Unclear
IIIA
623
R3
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 40 × 10
-
Unclear
III
624
K4–5
Mudbrick
Dark brown
60 × 46 × 10 25 × 25 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIB–A
344
AMIR GOLANI
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
625
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
626
N3
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
45 × 20 × 10
-
Pit(?) wall
IIIB
627
O3
Mudbrick
Brown
30 × 12 × 10
-
Unclear
II
628
L2/3
Stone
-
-
53 × 40 × 30 18 × 10 × 14
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIA
629
J4
Stone
-
-
22 × 13 × 10 16 × 12 × 10
Outer wall of Building L1
IV
630
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
631
J4
Mudbrick
Dark brown
30 × 12 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building L2
IIIB
632
K5
Mudbrick
Dark brown
30 × 40 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
633
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
634
I4
Mudbrick and stone(?)
Light brown
Unclear
Unclear
Partition(?) wall within Building L1
IV
635
K5
Mudbrick
Light brown
40 × 33 × 10
-
Silo(?) wall
IV
636
I–J3
Mudbrick
Dark brown
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building L2
IIIB
637
K3
Mudbrick
Dark brown
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building L3
IIIB
638
K5
Stone
-
-
45 × 35 × 20 60 × 50 × 30
Wall of Building L3(?)
IIIA
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
701
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
702
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
703
C8
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 20 × 15
-
Unclear
IIIA
704
D7
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
35 × 20 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
705
C6–7
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
40 × 20 × 10 35 × 21 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building M1
IV
706
C8
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
24 × 20 × 12
-
Unclear
IIIA
707
C–D8
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
27 × 24 × 10
-
Unclear
IV
708 (=W23)
D6–7
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
Unclear
-
Outer wall of Building M1
IV
709
D7
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with white chips
40 × 18 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB
710
C6
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions; and orange-brown
37 × 20 × 15 33 × 23 × 14
-
Granary wall
IIIB
Area M
345
APPENDIX 3: LOCUS AND WALL LISTS BY AREA
Wall
Square
Material
Mudbrick Type
Mudbrick Size (cm)
Stone Size (cm)
Use
Stratum
711
C6
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
24 × 13 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building M1
IV
712
C8
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
39 × 36 × 10
-
Outer wall of Building M1
IV
713
D9
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions, and orange-brown
40 × 25 × 10
-
Granary wall
IIIB–A
714
C8
Mudbrick
Brown
Unclear
-
Unclear
IVA
715
B10
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
40 × 20 × 10, 30 × 16 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
716
B11–13
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
50 × 35 × 10
-
Enclosure wall
IIIB–A
717
C11
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
32 × 21 × 10
-
Unclear
IV
718
C12
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
37 × 34 × 10
-
Unclear
IV
719
C12
Mudbrick
Orange-brown
45 × 43 × 10
-
Unclear
IV
720
B13
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with white calcite concretions
28 × 23 × 10
-
Partition(?) wall within compound
IIIB–A
721
B13
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
30 × 32 × 10
-
Enclosure(?) wall
IIIB–A
722
B13
Stone
-
-
22 × 18 × 10
Unclear
IIIA
723
-
-
-
-
-
Cancelled
-
724
D11
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
60 × 40 × 10 40 × 40 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB(?)
725
D11
Mudbrick
Light cream-gray with many white calcite concretions
60 × 40 × 10 40 × 40 × 10
-
Unclear
IIIB(?)
726
D9
Mudbrick
Brown to brownorange
Unclear
-
Unclear
IV
IAA R eports
No. 1 G. Avni and Z. Greenhut, The Akeldama Tombs Three Burial Caves in the Kidron Valley, Jerusalem, 1996, 129 pp. No. 2 E. Braun, Yiftah’el Salvage and Rescue Excavations at a Prehistoric Village in Lower Galilee, Israel, 1997, 249 pp. No. 3 G. Edelstein, I. Milevski and S. Aurant, Villages, Terraces and Stone Mounds Excavations at Manahat, Jerusalem, 1987–1989, 1998, 149 pp. No. 4 C. Epstein, The Chalcolithic Culture of the Golan, 1998, 352 pp. + plans. Hardcover. No. 5 T. Schick, The Cave of the Warrior A Fourth Millennium Burial in the Judean Desert, 1998, 137 pp. No. 6 R. Cohen, Ancient Settlement of the Central Negev I: The Chalcolithic Period, the Early Bronze Age and the Middle Bronze Age I (Hebrew, English Summary), 1999, 396 pp. No. 7 R. Hachlili and A. Killebrew, Jericho The Jewish Cemetery of the Second Temple Period, 1999, 202 pp. No. 8 Z. Gal and Y. Alexandre, Horbat Rosh Zayit An Iron Age Storage Fort and Village, 2000, 247 pp. No. 9 U. Dahari, Monastic Settlements in South Sinai in the Byzantine Period The Archaeological Remains, 2000, 250 pp. No. 10 Z. Yeivin, The Synagogue at Korazim The 1962–1964, 1980–1987 Excavations (Hebrew, English Summary), 2000, 216 pp. No. 11 M. Hartal, The al-Subayba (Nimrod) Fortress Towers 11 and 9, 2001, 129 pp. No. 12 R. Gonen, Excavations at Efrata A Burial Ground from the Intermediate and Middle Bronze Ages, 2001, 153 pp. No. 13 E. Eisenberg, A. Gopher and R. Greenberg, Tel Te’o A Neolithic, Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Site in the Hula Valley, 2001, 227 pp. No. 14 R. Frankel, N. Getzov, M. Aviam and A. Degani, Settlement Dynamics and Regional Diversity in Ancient Upper Galilee Archaeological Survey of Upper Galilee, 2001, 175 pp. No. 15 M. Dayagi-Mendels, The Akhziv Cemeteries The Ben-Dor Excavations, 1941–1944, 2002, 176 pp. No. 16 Y. Goren and P. Fabian, Kissufim Road A Chalcolithic Mortuary Site, 2002, 97 pp. No. 17 A. Kloner, Maresha Excavations Final Report I: Subterranean Complexes 21, 44, 70, 2003, 183 pp. No. 18 A. Golani, Salvage Excavations at the Early Bronze Age Site of Qiryat Ata, 2003, 261 pp. No. 19 H. Khalaily and O. Marder, The Neolithic Site of Abu Ghosh The 1995 Excavations, 2003, 146 pp. No. 20 R. Cohen and R. Cohen-Amin, Ancient Settlement of the Negev Highlands II: The Iron Age and Persian Period (Hebrew, English Summary), 2004, 258 pp. No. 21 D. Stacey, Exavations at Tiberias, 1973–1974: The Early Islamic Periods, 2004, 259 pp. No. 22 Y. Hirschfeld, Excavations at Tiberias, 1989–1994, 2004, 234 pp. No. 23 S. Ben-Arieh, Bronze and Iron Age Tombs at Tell Beit Mirsim, 2004, 212 pp.
No. 24 M. Dothan and D. Ben-Shlomo, Ashdod VI: The Excavations of Areas H and K (1968–1969), 2005, 320 pp. No. 25 M. Avissar, Tel Yoqne am Excavations on the Acropolis, 2005, 142 pp. No. 26 M. Avissar and E.J. Stern, Pottery of the Crusader, Ayyubid, and Mamluk Periods in Israel, 2005, 187 pp. No. 27 E.C.M. van den Brink and Ram Gophna, Shoham (North), Late Chalcolithic Burial Caves in the Lod Valley, Israel, 2005, 214 pp. No. 28 N. Getzov, The Tel Bet Yerah Excavations, 1994–1995, 2006, 204 pp. No. 29 A.M. Berlin, Gamla I: The Pottery of the Second Temple Period, the Shmarya Gutmann Excavations, 1976–1989, 2006, 181 pp. No. 30 R. Greenberg, E. Eisenberg, S. Paz and Y. Paz, Bet Yerah: The Early Bronze Age Mound I: Excavation Reports, 1933–1986, 2006, 500 pp. No. 31 E. Yannai, En Esur ( Ein Asawir) I: Excavations at a Protohistoric Site in the Coastal Plain of Israel, 2006, 308 pp. No. 32 T.J. Barako, Tel Mor The Moshe Dothan Excavations, 1959–1960, 2007, 276 pp. No. 33 G. Mazor and A. Najjar, Bet She’an I: Nysa-Scythopolis The Caesareum and the Odeum, 2007, 316 pp. No. 34 R. Cohen and H. Bernick-Greenberg, Kadesh Barnea (Tell el-Qudeirat) 1976–1982, 2007. In 2 parts. Part 1: Text, 410 pp.; Part 2: Plates, Plans and Sections, 332 pp. No. 35 A. Erlich and A. Kloner, Maresha Excavations Final Report II: Hellenistic Terracotta Figurines from the 1989–1996 Seasons, 2008, 208 pp. No. 36 G. Avni, U. Dahari and A. Kloner, The Necropolis of Bet Guvrin—Eleutheropolis, 2008, 238 pp. No. 37 V. Tzaferis and S. Israeli, Paneas I: The Roman to Early Islamic Periods Excavations in Areas A, B, E, F, G and H, 2008, 196 pp. No. 38 V. Tzaferis and S. Israeli, Paneas II: Small Finds and Other Studies, 2008, 256 pp. No. 39 Z. Greenhut and A. De Groot, Salvage Excavations at Tel Moza The Bronze and Iron Age Settlements and Later Occupations, 2009, 363 pp. No. 40 M. Hartal, Paneas IV: The Aqueduct and the Northern Suburbs, 2009, 212 pp. No. 41 N. Getzov, R. Lieberman-Wander, H. Smithline and D. Syon, Horbat Uza, the 1991 Excavations I: The Early Periods, 2009, 168 pp. No. 42 N. Getzov, D. Avshalom-Gorni, Y. Gorin-Rosen, E.J. Stern, D. Syon and A. Tatcher, Horbat Uza, the 1991 Excavations II: The Late Periods, 2009, 232 pp. No. 43 J. Seligman, Nahal Haggit A Roman and Mamluk Farmstead in the Southern Carmel, 2010, 277 pp. No. 44 D. Syon and Z. Yavor, Gamla II: The Architecture, the Shmarya Gutmann Excavations, 1976–1989, 2010, 216 pp. No. 45 A. Kloner, E. Eshel, H.B. Korzakova and G. Finkielsztejn, Maresha Excavations Final Report III: Epigraphic Finds from the 1989–2000 Seasons, 2010, 247 pp. No. 46 Y. Dagan, The Ramat Bet Shemesh Regional Project The Gazetteer, 2010, 360 pp. No. 47 Y. Dagan, The Ramat Bet Shemesh Regional Project Landscape of Settlement From the Paleolithic to the Ottoman Periods, 2011, 356 pp. No. 48 R. Bar-Nathan and W. Atrash, Bet She’an II: Baysān The Theater Pottery Workshop, 2011, 411 pp. No. 49 Y. Alexandre, Mary’s Well, Nazareth The Late Hellenistic to the Ottoman Periods, 2012, 180 pp. No. 50 D. Ben-Shlomo, The Azor Cemetery Moshe Dothan’s Excavations, 1958 and 1960, 2012, 238 pp.
No. 51/1 E.J. Stern, Akko I: The 1991–1998 Excavations, the Crusader-Period Pottery, Part 1: Text, 2012, 192 pp. No. 51/2 E.J. Stern, Akko I: The 1991–1998 Excavations, the Crusader-Period Pottery, Part 2: Plates, 2012, 172 pp. No. 52 D. Ben-Ami, Jerusalem, Excavations in the Tyropoeon Valley (Giv ati Parking Lot) I, 2013, 396 pp. No. 53 Y. Porath, Caesarea Maritima Volume I: Herod’s Circus and Related Buildings Part I: Architecture and Stratigraphy, 2013, 244 pp. No. 54 R. Greenberg, Bet Yerah, The Early Bronze Age Mound II: Urban Structure and Material Culture, 1933–1986 Excavations, 2014, 316 pp. No. 55 E. Yannai and Y. Nagar, Bet Dagan, Intermediate Bronze Age and Mamluk-Period Cemeteries, 2004–2005 Excavations, 2014, 260 pp. No. 56 D. Syon, Gamla III: The Shmarya Gutmann Excavations 1976–1989, Finds and Studies, Part 1, 2014, 260 pp. No. 57 Y. Porath, Caesarea Maritima I: Herod’s Circus and Related Buildings Part 2: The Finds, 2015, 224 pp. No. 58/1 G. Mazor and W. Atrash, Bet She’an III: Nysa-Scythopolis The Southern and Severan Theaters, Part 1: The Stratigraphy and Finds, 2015, 288 pp. No. 58/2 G. Mazor and W. Atrash, Bet She’an III: Nysa-Scythopolis The Southern and Severan Theaters, Part 2: The Architecture, 2015, 382 pp. No. 59 D. Syon, Gamla III: The Shmarya Gutmann Excavations 1976–1989, Finds and Studies, Part 2, 2016, 380 pp. No. 60. M. Hartal, D. Syon., E. Stern and A. Tatcher, Akko II: The 1991–1998 Excavations, the Early Periods, 2016, 242 pp. No. 61. R. Greenberg, O. Tal and T. Da‘adli, Bet Yerah III: Hellenistic Philoteria and Islamic al-Sinnabra, the 1933–1986 and 2007–2013 Excavations, 2017, 230 pp. No. 62. G. Mazor, W. Atrash and G. Finkielsztejn, Bet She’an IV: Hellenistic Nysa-Scythopolis The Amphora Stamps and Sealings from Tel Iztabba, 2018, 196 pp. No. 63. S. Weksler-Bdolah and A. Onn, Jerusalem, Western Wall Plaza Excavations I: The Roman and Byzantine Remains Architecture and Stratigraphy, 2019, pp. 276. No. 64. R. Rosenthal-Heginbottom, Jerusalem, Western Wall Plaza Excavations II: The Pottery from the Eastern Cardo, 2019, 337 pp. No. 65. A. Golani, Ashqelon Barne a, The Early Bronze Age Site I: The Excavations, 2019, 353 pp.