494 119 280MB
English Pages 344 [337] Year 2023
A pioneering study of the emergence of Buddhist art in southern India, featuring vibrant photography of rare works, many published here for the first time
Named for two primary motifs in Buddhist art, the sacred bodhi tree and the protective snake, Tree & Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India is the first publication to foreground devotional works produced in the Deccan from 200 BCE to 400 CE. Unlike traditional narratives, which focus on northern India (where the Buddha was born, taught, and died), this groundbreaking book presents Buddhist art from monastic sites in the south. Long neglected, this is among the earliest surviving bodies of Buddhist art, and among the most sublimely beautiful. An international team of researchers contributes new scholarship on the sculptural and devotional art associated with Buddhism, and masterpieces from recently excavated Buddhist sites are published here for the first time-including Kanaganahalli and Phanigiri, the most important new discoveries in a generation. With its exploration of Buddhism's emergence in southern India, as well as of India's deep commercial and cultural engagement with the Hellenized and Roman worlds, this definitive study expands our understanding of the origins of Buddhist art itself.
344 pages; 322 illustrations; 3 maps; bibliography; glossary; gazetteer; index
John Guy is Florence and Herbert Irving Curator of the Arts of South and Southeast Asia in the
Department of Asian Art at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
Jacket illustrations: front, Stu.pa panel with niigariija Mucalinda protecting the Buddha, Dhulikatta stupa, Karimnagar district, Telangana, Satavahana, 1st century BCE; back, Congregation hall pillar celebrating the Great Renunciation (detail), Phanigiri, Suryapet district, Telangana, Ik~vaku, 3rd-4th century CE Jacket design by Laura Lindgren
The Metropolitan Museum of Art 1000
Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10028 metmuseum.org Distributed by Yale University Press, New Haven and London yalebooks.com/art yalebooks.co.uk PRINTED IN SPAIN
TREE & SERPENT Early Buddhist Art in India
John Guy •.
I '.
·-"
TIE MIT THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART, NEW YORK DISTRIBUTED BY YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NEW HAVEN AND LONDON
CONTENTS Sponsors' Statements 6 I Director's Foreword 7 Preface 8 I Acknowledgments 10 Note to the Reader Lenders to the Exhibition 13 I Contributors 13
12
MAPS
Indian Subcontinent 14 India's Global Setting 15 Major Buddhist Sites Active in the Deccan, 200
BCE-400 CE 15
BEGINNINGS OF BUDDHIST IMAGERY Early Buddhist Landscape of Southern India 18 John Guy
CATALOGUE
26
John Guy
RELICS, STUPAS, AND TEXTS Stupas, Footprints, and Imagination in Early Buddhism 76 Peter Skilling
Stupas and the Cult of Relics 82 John Guy
Celebrating the Buddha in Early Southern India 88 John Guy
CATALOGUE
96
John Guy
MONASTIC BUDDHISM, COMMERCE, AND PATRONAGE The Business Side of a Buddhist Monastery n8 Gregory Schopen
Buddhist Patronage and Monastic Institutions in Andhra: Epigraphic Evidence 123 Vincent Tournier
Maritime Networks of Coastal Andhradesa 129 Himanshu Prabha Ray
CATALOGUE
132
John Guy
GLOBAL SETTING Rome and Its Connections with India
160
Norman Underwood
Evoking the Buddha in Peninsular India, Sri Lanka, and Southeast Asia
166
Sunil Gupta
CATALOGUE
17 0
John Guy
THE BUDDHA REVEALED The Development of Buddhist Image Worship in Early Andhradesa 198 Akira Shimada
Buddhist Narratives at Kanaganahalli 203 Monika Zin
The Buddhist Stone of Andhradesa
207
Federico Caro
CATALOGUE
210
John Guy
Early India: Chronology and Key Events 280 Gazetteer of Buddhist Sites, Principally in the Deccan
282
John Guy and Vaishnavi Patil
Glossary 290 Bibliography 310
Notes to Essays and Catalogue 296 I Index 332 I Photograph Credits 343
SPONSORS' STATEMENTS It is our great joy and privilege to support the exhibition Tree and Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India, 200 BCE400 CE at The Metropolitan Museum of Art. At Reliance Foundation, we are committed to preserving and promoting Indian heritage and shining a spotlight on Indian art on the global stage. This exhibition traces the origins of early Buddhist imagery and showcases newly discovered and never before seen masterpieces of Buddhist art. In the "cradle of Buddhism," the teachings of the Buddha are entwined with an Indian ethos, and continue to shape global thought, culture, and ways of life. We are excited to collaborate with The Met and John Guy, Florence and Herbert Irving Curator of the Arts of South and Southeast Asia, and to celebrate this confluence of spirituality, religion, and art. Buddha's message enlightens the hearts and minds of devotees around the world, and I hope this exhibition gives them and others an opportunity to immerse themselves in the philosophy of Buddhism.
Nita M. Ambani Founder Chairperson, Reliance Foundation ~ Reliance
~• •
Industries Limited
J
t.l Reliance
r Foundation
It is an honor to support The Metropolitan Museum of Art's commitment to opening new vistas on the ancient arts of South and Southeast Asia, and the curatorial vision and groundbreaking research that John Guy, Florence and Herbert Irving Curator of the Arts of South and Southeast Asia, brought us with Lost Kingdoms: Hindu-Buddhist Sculpture of Early Southeast Asia in 2014 and now with Tree and Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India, 200 BCE-400 CE. I first met John almost twenty years ago in London while auditing lectures in the postgraduate diploma program in Asian art at the School of Oriental and African Studies, where I encountered a number of influential teachers. John and the inimitable scholar Pratapaditya Pal inspired me and so many other students of Asian art for decades, and I owe them an enormous debt. Congratulations to The Met for the courage in bringing us yet another transformative exhibition that will add much to our understanding of the origins of Buddhist art and the lessons of the Buddha, so relevant to our needs today.
~
Fred Eychaner Fred Eychaner Fund 6
Inspired and informed by interconnectedness, The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Global supports programs in arts, culture, and Buddhism, and funds initiatives that enhance the well-being of humanity, wildlife, and the environment. With our first major collaboration with The Metropolitan Museum of Art, we are proud to support Tree and Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India, 200 BCE-400 CE, an exhibition closely aligned with our interest in activating art resources for broad, nonsectarian learning of Buddhism and Buddhist art on the worldwide level. We are honored to support The Met in welcoming visitors from across the globe to learn and engage with Buddhist teachings and the origins of Buddhist art.
Phillip Henderson Chief Executive Officer, The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Global The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Global
DIRECTOR'S FOREWORD With T ree and Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India, 2 00 BCE-400 CE, The Metropolitan Museum of Art celebrates the extraordinary artistry of this early period in India and continues its commitment to presenting exhibitions that open new frontiers on the past for our visitors, both in terms of popular awareness and new scholarship. The message that the Buddha taught in the fourth century BCE, and was memorialized in rock-cut edicts by the Mauryan emperor Asoka in the mid-third century BCE, remains starkly relevant to us today. His call to not slaughter the animals of the forests nor burn their habitats addresses contemporary agendas of environmental awareness and care for the planet under our stewardship. One of the Buddhist jataka stories from this time tells of a king of Varar:iasI who put the forest at Sarnath under his protection so that the deer could roam free of the fear of hunters, thus creating perhaps the first national park. Above all else, the Buddha's message was compassion for all living creatures. The serenely beautiful art that was produced in service of Buddhism, and is presented in this exhibition and book, celebrates the outstanding artistic achievements of this time and addresses universal concerns principally through storyt elling, a simple and accessible pathway that the di sciples of the Buddha and their lineage descendants developed, following the Buddha's example. This exhibition and publication featuring the arts associated with the earliest Buddhist stupas represent a monumental undertaking on the part of the Museum and an expression of trust and goodwill on the part of our lenders. This assembly of rare early Buddhist works of art includes a number of objects that have recently been excavated from monastic sites in India, and have never before been publicly exhibited. It is our privilege to present these outside India for the first time. Foremost, I wish to express profound appreciation to t he Government of India's Ministry of Culture, thanks to whom we have been able to present so many extraordinary works of art from India, gathered from numerous museums and archaeological sites across multiple states. We express our deep gratitude to their governments: Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. The many individuals who generously assisted are listed in the Acknowledgments. I am delighted to also thank our lenders from Europe, notably the British Museum and the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, and the Museum fur Asiatische Kunst - Staatliche Museen zu Berlin. In the United States, my appreciation goes to t he Brooklyn Museum, the Cleveland Museum of Art, and the Norton Simon Museum, Pasadena.
Exhibitions of antiquities of this kind are expensive undertakings, and we are indebted to the sponsors who generously stepped forward to help us realize this milestone in U.S.-Indian cultural cooperation. Tremendous thanks are owed to Reliance Industries Limited, The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Global, and the Fred Eychaner Fund for making this exhibition possible. We are also grateful to the Estate of Brooke Astor, the Florence and Herbert Irving Fund for Asian Art Exhibitions, the E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Foundation, the Lavori Sterling Foundation Endowment Fund, and Usha M. and Marti G. Subrahmanyam for their generous support. This wonderful catalogue is made possible by the Florence and Herbert Irving Fund for Asian Art Publications, with additional funding from Albion Art Co., Ltd., and I gratefully acknowledge their support. The symposium is presented with the support of the Fred Eychaner Fund and organized in cooperation with the New York Center for Global Asia, NYU Shanghai Center for Global Asia, and the Lakshmi Mittal and Family South Asia Institute, Harvard University. T ree and Serpent was conceived by John Guy, Florence and Herbert Irving Curator of South and Southeast Asian Art, and realized over several years, extended by the interruption of the worldwide pandemic. His resolute commitment brought this exhibition and publication to fruition , in what became something of a Herculean challenge. Curatorship today requires a particular mix of scholarship, connoisseurship, and diplomacy to realize an exhibition of this complexity. Skilled teams of colleagues across the Museum came together in collaboration, and I thank them all for their dedication. The Department of Asian Art, led by Douglas Dillion Chair Maxwell K. Hearn, provided leadership as did Deputy Director for Exhibitions Quincy Houghton, along with Deputy Director for Collections and Administration Andrea Bayer. We are further grateful to the international scholars in the field of Buddhist studies who contributed texts to the present volume. In a world of growing uncertainties, this exhibition and publication remind us of all that we share. Beyond the aesthetic experience and the quietude that this art invokes, it brings a deeper message built on mutual understanding and respect. India is the home of many faiths, including Buddhism, and in sharing this rich heritage it allows art to be its ambassador. Max Hollein Marina Kellen French Director The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
7
PREFACE Tree & Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India presents the story of the origins of Buddhist art in India. In so doing, it examines these sources through a less familiar lens, that of the art of the Satavahana and Ik~vaku dynasties of southern India, who variously ruled the region from the first century BCE to the early fourth century CE. To better understand the processes by which the Buddhist faith and culture were disseminated, the focus is shifted away from the heartland of Buddhism, the greater Magadha region of northern India where the Buddha was born, taught, and died, to the territories of the Dak~iQ.apatha, the regions of the south, and the roads that led there. The southern region, the Deccan, was home to some of the greatest early monasteries of Buddhist India. Today, we turn to Bharhut, Sanchi, and Amaravati when we seek to understand the majesty of this architecture and its adornment. The enclosure railing at Bharhut, the ceremonial gateways at Sanchi, and the first copings at Amaravati are the earliest and best preserved of their kind from the early Buddhist world. They are rich in visual narrative, using their surfaces as tableaux for the storytelling that made Buddhism accessible to a wide community of believers. The exhibition takes the stupa (a dome-shaped structure originating as a funerary mound) as its central motif, embodying as it does the essence of Buddhism, the person of the Buddha (his relics), and his teachings (Dharma). The architectural components of stupas provided the platform for Buddhist teachings, deploying auspicious signs and symbolic representations in narrative settings to convey the essential teachings. Almost all the works of art presented here once formed an integral part of the adornment of this pivotal Buddhist monument that emergedlotus-like-from the earthen funerary mound that was the stupa's genesis. Two iconographic devices were privileged above all others in the adornment of the southern stupa: the branching bodhi tree and the snake (naga). Their ubiquitous presence in southern Indian stupa decor prompted James Fergusson, an early student of Buddhist architecture, to title his 1868 publication Tree and Serpent Worship:
Or, Illustrations of Mythology and Art in India in the First and Fourth Centuries after Christ. The present exhibition and publication seek both to recognize the pioneers in the field of Buddhist architectural and art historical studies, and to reposition the field going forward. Two historical correctives are in order. The first is to give due recognition to the importance of southern Buddhism, here defined as that of the Deccan and its parallel life in Sri Lanka. Early Buddhist art history has long been focused on the art of Mathura and Sarnath, along with other sites in the Gangetic Basin of northern India, and
8
FIG. 1. A village elder at the entrance to the medieval Hindu temple at Chandavaram, Guntur di strict, Andhra Pradesh. Two limestone panels with bodhi tree, stupa , and Dharma-wheel design, removed from the nearby Siitaviihana-era stupa site, are installed as doorway paving. Photographed in 2017
the Gandhara region of the northwest, present-day Pakistan, largely to the exclusion of the myriad developments taking place in the south. Recent studies, including those of scholars contributing to this publication, have begun to recognize the importance of the Buddhist Deccan, spanning from the rock-cut viharas of the Western Ghats to the riverine and coastal monasteries along the Bay of Bengal. The second corrective is to realign the study of the Buddhist legacy of the Deccan within the wider field of Indian Ocean studies and global history. Much that we need to learn about Buddhist India in the early centuries CE is increasingly recognized as being shaped by the dynamics of global exchange. The western Indian Ocean trade with the Red Sea and Mediterranean was a major factor, as were the less well understood exchange systems of the Bay of Bengal with Southeast Asia and China. The Romans prepared papyrus bills of loading for cargoes of ivory and pepper shipped from the Konkan Coast of western India to the Mediterranean (fig. 81). No such primary sources exist for Southeast Asia, but the recovery of Mauryan stone artifacts there makes clear that deep commercial-and cultural-engagements began much earlier than previously acknowledged (figs. 77-79). This exhibition and publication are privileged to foreground two recently excavated stupa sites that have redefined much of what we understand about Southern Buddhism. Both sites have been found relatively intact, a rarity in the Deccan, where natural and human attrition has taken a heavy toll. Kanaganahalli stupa in northern Karnataka, and the hilltop monastic complex of Phanigiri in Telangana, have added two major sites to the already extensive corpus of Buddhist sites in the Deccan (see Maps). Sculptures from both stupa complexes are presented here for the first time, along with masterpieces from such little-known sites as Pauni, BrahmapurI,
F IG. 2 . $ac;ldanta-jataka (of the elepha nt "Six-Tusks" ) drum panel depicting the hunter So nuttara prese nting t he tu sks of Ch addanta, the ki ng of the elephants and t he b odh isa ttva in d isgu ise. Insc ribed : Chaddanta -jataka. Kanaganaha lli, Sann ati , Gulba rg a d istri ct, Karnaaka. Satavahana, 1st century BC E. Limest one
F IG. 3 . Mosai c depicting an unnamed goddess, pro bably the perso nific ati o n of India , display ing ivory, pepper, aromati c w ood, and textiles, and co mmanding an elephant and t igress. South apse, Vi lla Rom ana d el Casale, Piazza Ar merina, Si c ily, 4th ce ntury CE
Dhulikatta, Dupadu, Jaggayyapeta, Chandavaram, and Goli. The important contributions made by the excavators of these two new sites, the Archaeological Survey of India and the Department of Heritage, Telangana, are here respectfully acknowledged. The showering of mercantile wealth, built largely on interregional trade and by the stimulus of a burgeoning international exchange with the Roman world, resulted in much of the finest Buddhist art preserved in India. With the waning of that trade, support for the monastic communities also subsided, and Buddhism gradually faded from the Indian landscape. The monasteries were abandoned and their majestic architecture pillaged, the limestone adornments crushed and burned to produce lime and the brick core of the stupas quarried for building materials. These practices are witnessed today at the village of Chandavaram in Andhra Pradesh, where two culpted limestone panels from the nearby stupa complex have been used to decorate the threshold of a local Hindu temple (fig. 1). At another village in the district, Velpuru, limestone ayaka pillars have been refashioned as Saiva lingas. The appropriation and repurposing of religious sites and their architectural remains is not a new phenomenon in India; the sacred landscape has always been contested. The Buddhists were not shy in the propagation of their faith and, for more than a millennium, succeeded. But just as they appropriated and subjugated the nature cults of early India, so Buddhist sites were in turn either abandoned or given over to Hindu temples. Early Buddhist art was also shaped in part by external stimuli, present across India from the Mauryan period as West Asian Hellenism and then Roman influences left t heir marks on the arts of the subcontinent. The participation of the ivory guild of Ujjain in the funding of a monumental stone gateway at Sanchi signals the importance of
the ivory trade to the economy of early India. This involvement is mirrored in a jataka story popular in Satavahanaera art, the Chaddanta-jtitaka. The disturbing tale of jealousy, revenge, cruelty, and remorse, is first told in the south at Kanaganahalli (fig. 2) . Ivory traders would have been a familiar sight at the marts of the Konkan Coast, from where great quantities of ivory and luxury objects made from the material were shipped west, as witnessed at Pompeii (cat. 85). The Roman trade with India in the early centuries CE is increasingly regarded by modern Roman historians as a crucial factor in sustaining the expansive campaigns of the Roman Empire. Arguably, this trade is what we are witnessing in a fourth-century apse mosaic decorating the luxury Villa Romana del Casale in Piazza Armerina, Sicily (fig. 3) . A goddess, flanked by an elephant and tigress, displays a cornucopia-like tusk and is surrounded by black pepper plants and a tree that is likely the aromatic agarwood. She wears a diaphanous garment suggestive of Indian muslin, a favorite in Roman couture, and may be identified as the personification of India. While her identity may be contested, what is indisputable is the role that Satavahana trade in ivory, pepper, aromatics, and cotton goods played in the Mediterranean world. Likewise, the wealth it engendered in India, especially in the Andhradesa territories of the Deccan, contributed to a boom period in the patronage of Buddhist monasteries when much of the sculptural art was added in the form of new encasement panels and enclosures. It is this chapter of early Buddhist art that is celebrated here. John Guy Florence and Herbert Irving Curator of the Arts of South and Southeast Asia The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
9
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This exhibition and publication could not have happened without the support and vision of the director and leadership of The Metropolitan Museum of Art, who entrusted me to develop two major exhibitions that would extend the boundaries of scholarship in the field of Indian and Southeast Asian art history. The first was Lost Kingdoms: Hindu-Buddhist Sculpture of Early Southeast Asia, mounted in 2014, and the second, prepared with the unstinting support of Marina Kellen French Director Max Hollein, is Tree and Serpent: Early Buddhist Art in India, 200 BCE-400 CE, presented here. Deputy Director for Collections and Administration Andrea Bayer and Deputy Director for Exhibitions Quincy Houghton have further helped sustain our commitment to this exhibition in many ways. I am grateful to them all. The field research that underpins this exhibition and publication took place over an extended period, commencing in earnest in 2014. I returned to India repeatedly thereafter, investigating the many stupa sites that mark the monastic landscape of ancient Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. The associated sculptural remains are dispersed in museums spanning the country. In the course of this fieldwork I enjoyed the generous support of numerous colleagues who facilitated access to museums and storerooms, and at times accompanied me to the more remote sites. To colleagues in India, I begin by expressing my deep gratitude to the Hon. Minister of Tourism, Shri G. Kishan Reddy; Hon. Minister of State for External Affairs and Culture, Smt. Meenakashi Lekhi; Secretary of Culture, Shri Govind Mohan; and Joint Secretary Smt. Mugdha Sinha. They are responsible for the guardianship of India's heritage, and their support was central to the success of this cultural cooperation between India and the United States. The Indian Ambassador to the United States, HE Taranjit Singh Sandhu, and the Indian Consul General in New York, Randhir Jaiswal, are owed special mention for their vision and steadfast support. I thank Smt. Lily Pandeya, Director General of the National Museum, New Delhi, for her support, along with her exceptional team in the International Exhibitions Department, led by curators Zahid Ali Ansari and Visetuonuo Kiso. They have been pivotal in managing the loans from India and are thanked for their professionalism and grace. I am grateful to Jawhar Sircar, the former Secretary of Culture under whose benevolent eye this project began, and to Venu Vasudevan, former Director General of the National Museum, New Delhi. The Archaeological Survey of India, charged with the enormous responsibility of protecting more than three thousand heritage sites throughout India, is among the oldest such organizations in the world. I extend my deep
10
appreciation to the Director General, V. Vidyavathi, along with Joint Director General M. Nambirajan and many other colleagues there, including D. N. Dimri, Sanjay Kumar Manjul, N. K. Sinha, Anil K. Tiwari, and Vinay Gupta. I also note with gratitude the support of retired Directors Generals Rakesh Tewari and B. R. Mani, both of whom gave essential support in the formative phase of this project. Beyond New Delhi, we have engaged with, and are indebted to, seven state governments and the numerous museums and archaeological sites that are under their watch: The Government of Andhra Pradesh: Hon. Chief Minister Shri Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy; Dr. Mukthapuram Harikrishna of the Chief Minister's Office, Velagapudi; Hon. Minister of Tourism, Culture & Youth Advancement Smt. R. K. Roja; Principal Secretary to Government (Sports & Youth Services) Dr. G. Vani Mohan, also Commissioner of the Department of Archaeology & Museums; that Department's Assistant Director Shri R. Phalguna Rao; and the Department's staff. The Government of Bihar: Hon. Chief Minister Shri Nitish Kumar; Principal Secretary of Art, Culture and Youth Affairs Shri Ravi Manubhai Parmar; Director General of the Bihar Museum Shri Anjani Kumar Singh; Additional Director Shri Ranbeer Singh Rajput; and their curatorial team. The State Government of Maharashtra: Hon. Chief Minister of Maharashtra Shri Eknath Shinde; Additional Chief Secretary Shri Bhushan Gagrani; Principal Secretary of Tourism and Cultural Affairs Shri Saurabh Vijay; Director of the State Directorate of Archaeology and Museums Shri Tejas Garge; and Kolhapur Town Hall Museum curator Shri Amrut Patil. The State Government of Tamil Nadu: Hon. Minister for Industries, Tamil Official Language and Tamil Culture and Archaeology Shri Thangam Thennarasu; Principal Secretary for Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Shri B. Chandra Mohan; Director of the Government Museum, Chennai, Shri Sandeep Nanduri; Assistant Director Shri K. Sekar; and curator Shri S. Paneerselvam. Thanks also to former Director Ms. Kavitha Ramu. The State Government of Telangana: Hon. Chief Minister Shri K. Chandrashekar Rao; Secretary of Youth Advancement, Tourism, Culture & Sports Shri San deep Kumar Sultania, also Director of the Department of Heritage, Telangana; that Department's Deputy Directors Shri Bavandla Narayana and Shri P. Nagaraju; and Assistant Director Ms. V. Nagalaxmi. Thanks are also extended to former advisor of the Chief Minister, Shri B. V. Papa Rao, and to the former Director of the Department of Heritage, Telangana Shri N. R. Visalatchy. The Government of Uttar Pradesh: Hon. Chief Minister Shri Yogi Adityanath; Allahabad Museum
Director Shri Rajesh Prasad; along with retired Direcor Shri Sunil Gupta; Assistant Curator Shri Waman \ ankhede; and Financial Officer Shri Raghavendra Singh. The State Government of West Bengal: Hon. Chief Min. ter Ms. Mamata Banerjee; Shri Arijit Dutta Choudhury, Director-in-charge of the Indian Museum, Kolkata; along with Ms. Nita Sengupta; Shri Sayan Bhattacharya; Shri atyakam Sen; and former Director Shri Jayanta Sengupta. The United States Embassy in New Delhi and its consulates throughout India have Generously assisted and facilitated this project throughout its long life. Special thanks goes to former Ambassador Kenneth I. Juster, who embraced the importance of the exhibition while on hi first visit to Amaravati. I am also grateful to Charge d Affaires A. Elizabeth Jones and colleagues at the embassy and consulates, including Karl Adam, Gloria Berbena, Jennifer Bullock, Katherine Hadda, Scott Hartmann, Brindha Jayakanth, Salil Kader, David Kennedy, Lauren Lovelace, David Moyer, Ratna Mukherjee, Melinda Pavek, Judith Raven, and Madhuri Sehgal. For loans in Europe, The Met is indebted to the British . luseum, London, in particular Director Hartwig Fischer and Keeper of the Asian Department Jane Portal; the \ ictoria and Albert Museum, London, and Director Tri st ram Hunt, Keeper of the Asian Art Department Anna Jackson, and curator Nick Barnard; the Museum fiir Asiatische Kunst - Staatliche Museen zu Berlin, its Direcor Raffael Dedo Gadebusch and curator Martina Stoye; and to the National Archaeological Museum, Naples, and its Scientific Director Marialucia Giacco. In the United tates, the Cleveland Museum of Art has been a generous lender under Director and President William M. Griswold and with support from George P. Bickford Curator of Indian and Southeast Asian Art Sonya Rhie Mace, as has the orton Simon Museum, Pasadena, thanks to President Walter W. Timoshuk and Chief Curator Emily Talbot. This project's sponsors recognized the importance of this endeavor, and I sincerely thank them for their investment in this work. Reliance Industries Limited, The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Global, and the Fred Eychaner Fund make the exhibition possible. My appreciation goes to the Estate of Brooke Astor, the Florence and Herbert Irving Fund for Asian Art Exhibitions, and the E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Foundation for their major support, as well as to the Lavori Sterling Foundation Endowment Fund and Usha M. and Marti G. Subrahmanyam for their additional generosity. The Fred Eychaner Fund also makes possible the exhibition's scholarly symposium, organized in cooperation with New York Center for Global Asia, NYU Shanghai Center for
Global Asia, and the Lakshmi Mittal and Family South Asia Institute, Harvard University. Finally, the beautiful book you now hold is made possible by the Florence and Herbert Irving Fund for Asian Art Publications, with additional support from Albion Art Co., Ltd . Foremost at The Met I must thank my colleagues in the Department of Asian Art, who have long supported this project with good humor. I am indebted to Douglas Dillion Chair Maxwell K. Hearn, who has been a steady guide and staunch ally. Stephanie Kwai, Senior Manager of Administration, Operations, and Collections, has been a pillar of strength, stepping forward even before one knew help was needed. Collections Manager Alison Clark has ensured that order prevailed, along with Mary Hurt, Inae Rurup, and Edmon Zhou. Technicians Beatrice Pinto, Imtikar Ally, Sooyoung Jeon, and Djamel Haoues handled and installed the works of art with skill and graciousness. This project benefited from the dedication of several research assistants, whom I thank: Maud Leclair, Vaishnavi Patil, and Kalyani Ramachandran. In preparing the Gazetteer of Buddhist Sites, Principally in the Deccan, I was ably assisted by interns Jovanna Abdou, Tarini Gandhi, Dhwani Gudka, Ottilie Lighte, Kaira Mediratta, Raagini Pareek, Mallika Ramachandran, and Gillian Scholz. In the Exhibitions Department headed by Quincy Houghton, Senior Manager of Exhibitions Gillian Fruh and Touring Exhibitions Project Manager Jason Kotara navigated the many challenges of this exhibition. Vinod Daniel served as project manager in India, skillfully facilitating and guiding in equal measure. The Registrar's Office has played a pivotal role, with Senior Associate Registrar Allison Barone at the helm, with Meryl Cohen, Mehgan Pizarro, and Sarah Kraft, as did Amy Lamberti, Associate General Counsel in the Office of the Secretary and General Counsel. The staff of Star International in India and Masterpiece International in New York are due thanks for their logistical expertise. The Design Department, led by Head of Design Alicia Cheng, with the brilliant design team of Senior Exhibition Designer Patrick Herron and Associate Design Manager Mortimer Lebigre, ensured that the curatorial vision for the exhibition was beautifully and evocatively realized. Special mention should be made of the Buildings Management team responsible for installing the works safely, led by Taylor Miller, with Michael Doscher and Matthew Lytle. Likewise, I am grateful to the Lighting Designers, guided by Amy Nelson. The Department of Objects Conservation, led by Sherman Fairchild Conservator in Charge Lisa Pilosi, brought its formidable experience to this project, and I thank Vicki Parry, Carolyn Riccardelli, Frederick Sager, and Marlene
11
Yandrisevits. I am further grateful to Research Scientist Federico Caro in the Department of Scientific Research. The Department of Institutional Advancement worked closely with the curatorial team in expertly securing funds for this project, and I am grateful to Stephen A. Manzi, John L. Wielk, Jason Herrick, Kimberly McCarthy, and Evie Chabot. In the External Affairs Department, Stella Kim led the press and media promotions, working closely with the Digital Department's team, headed by Douglas Hegley. The Education Department, led by Heidi Holder, Frederick P. and Sandra P. Rose Chair of Education, placed talented interns and developed a rich array of programming, for which I thank Francesca D'Alessio, Elizabeth Perkins, Marianna Siciliano, and Sherri Williams. Members of the Publications and Editorial Department are to be thanked for their usual professionalism in seeing this book to fruition: Publisher and Editor in Chief Mark Polizzotti; Associate Publisher for Production Peter Antony; Associate Publisher for Editorial Michael Sittenfeld; Senior ' Editor Elizabeth L. Block, with Sarah McFadden; Senior Production Manager Christopher Zichello; Image Acquisitions Specialist Josephine Rodriguez; Editor Elizabeth Benjamin; Associate Editor Cecilia Weddell; designer Laura Lindgren; and bibliographer Amelia Kutschbach. Yael Shiri provided expert proofreading of the Middle Indo-Aryan and Sanskrit terminology. The publication isgreatly enhanced by the photography of Thierry Ollivier,
whose extraordinarily beautiful photographs were produced often in the most challenging of circumstances. The contributors to this publication deserve special mention: Shailendra Bhandare, Pia Brancaccio, Federico Caro, Parul Pandya Dhar, Sunil Gupta, Himanshu Prabha Ray, Gregory Schopen, Peter Skilling (Bhadra Rujirathat), Akira Shimada, Elizabeth Rosen Stone, Vincent Tournier, Norman Underwood, and Monika Zin. On a personal note, I extend thanks to Romila Thapar, Kesavan Veluthat, Oskar von Hiniiber, Harry Falk, Naman Ahuja, and Suchandra Ghosh for their scholarship and friendship over the years. Akira Shimada served as an advisor to this project and on occasion an agreeable travel companion in the Andhra territories. I thank him on both counts. Arla Griffiths and Vincent Tournier generously shared their groundbreaking contributions to Andhra epigraphy, along with contributors Stefan Baums, Emmanuel Francis, and Inga Strauch, in the Early Inscriptions of Andhradesa (EIAD) online project. Thanks are due to Annette Giesecke on matters botanical and to William Dalrymple for his encouragement. The generous support of our sponsors is detailed above, but I wish to record my personal appreciation to Anita Chung and Fred Eychaner for their belief in this project. Finally, I am indebted to colleagues in India for their extraordinary acts of kindness to me on this project. These friendships are the bedrock of international cooperation and understanding. John Guy Florence and Herbert Irving Curator of the Arts of South and Southeast Asia
NOTE TO THE READER Abbreviations ASI Archaeological Survey of India alt. alternate anc. ancient mod. modern
lit. Skt. Tib. var.
literally Sanskrit Tibetan variant
Unless otherwise noted, catalogue entries are written by John Guy. Note on Translation Unless otherwise noted, translations of quotations are by the authors. Note on Transliteration Dealing primarily with art of the Indian subcontinent, many of the terms and toponyms discussed in this book originate from a variety of Indic languages and their spelling in English can therefore vary. Some of these terms, such as Buddha or Dharma, have entered common use in contemporary English. However, in order to offer consistency and clarity but also to be as loyal to their original pronunciation as possible, many of these words have been transliterated.
12
Place names in particular posed a challenge as they occur in various forms in the available literature, and modern place names have become invariably associated with their ancient history. In this book, places of archaeological significance as well as ancient toponyms have been transliterated, while for other place names they have been omitted. The transliteration of words in Devanagari and related Indic scripts has been rendered with diacritics, to indicate a diversity of phonetic sounds not always reflected in Latin script, following the ISO 15919 Romanization standard established by the International Organization for Standardization (2001). For consistency, when a term or proper name can occur variously in different languages, the Sanskrit spelling was prioritized over others. All nonEnglish terms appear in italics. At times, the book makes use of epigraphic evidence, in which cases the inscribed spelling of proper names and toponyms was preserved. As for the names of rulers, whose names have been spelled in epigraphic records in various ways, a standardized spelling was used throughout. In the case of the Satavahana dynasty, a standardized Prakrit spelling has been opted for.
LENDERS TO THE EXHIBITION
CONTRIBUTORS
INDIA Government of India, Minist ry of Culture
AUTHOR John Guy, Florence and Herbert Irving Curator of the Arts of South and Southeast Asia, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
Archaeological Survey of India, Archaeological Museum ASI, Amavarati, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh Archaeological Survey of India, Kanaganahalli Archaeological Site ASI, Sannati, Gulbarga District, Karnataka Archaeological Survey of India, Nagarjunakonda, Archaeological Museum ASI, Nagarjunakonda, Andhra Pradesh
CONTRIBUTORS Shailendra Bhandare, Curator of South Asian and FarEastern Coins and Paper Money, Ashmolean Museum of Art and Archaeology, Oxford, England
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati Heritage Centre and Museum, Department of Archaeology and Museums
Pia Brancaccio, Professor of Art History, Drexel University, Philadelphia
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Baudhasri Archaeological Museum, Guntur, Guntur District, Department of Archaeology and Museums
Federico Caro, Research Scientist, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York
Government of Bihar, Bihar Museum, Patna
Parul Pandya Dhar, Associate Professor of Art History, University of Delhi, New Delhi
Government of Maharashtra, Town Hall Museum, Kolhapur, Department of Archaeology and Museums Government of Tamil Nadu, Government Museum, Chennai Government of Telangana, Karimnagar Archaeology Museum, Department of Archaeology and Museums Government of Telangana, Phanigiri Stupa Site, Department of Heritage Telangana, Hyderabad Government of Telangana, State Archaeology Museum, Department of Heritage Telangana, Hyderabad Government of Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Museum, Prayagraj
Sunil Gupta, Former Director In Charge, Allahabad Museum, Prayagraj. Ministry of Culture, Government of India Himanshu Prabha Ray, Professor, Centre for Historical Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Gregory Schopen, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Department of Asian Languages and Cultures, University of California, Los Angeles Akira Shimada, Professor, Department of History, State University of New York at New Paltz
Government of West Bengal, Indian Museum, Kolkata National Museum, New Delhi
Peter Skilling, Adjunct Professor, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
EUROPE Museum fiir Asiatische Kunst - Staatliche Museen zu Berlin
Elizabeth Rosen Stone, Independent Scholar, New York
The British Museum, London Nick Gilbey and Mrs. Thomasin Nares
Vincent Tournier, Professor of Classical Indology, Institut fiir Indologie und Tibetologie, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
National Archaeological Museum, Naples Victoria and Albert Museum, London
Norman Underwood, Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History, New York University
Private collection
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Brooklyn Museum
Monika Zin, Professor of Art History and Asian Studies, Saxon Academy of Sciences and Humanities and Leipzig University, Leipzig
Cleveland Museum of Art Norton Simon Foundation, Pasadena Private collections
13
.
Sanghol
~ 4 ./
.
.,
1,
'
~~
4
l
4.
y
A
., s
/ Udayagiri
Kalingapatiram
B4Y of Benga/
.
Bengaluru
Arabian Sea
miles 0
0
100
Indian Ocean 6oo
kilometers
Locations marked with a red dot are described in the Gazetteer of Buddhist Sites, Principally in the Deccan .
14
._"
0'1, 'I
0. ..
~ ~ .. lndia's Global Setting 0
Bamiyar\ Begram
• •
. Gandhara (Peshawa r) T:Xila • Banhore Sanghol e
Kandahar •
Delhi • Mathura •
miles 0
200
0
200
Indian
kilometers
.
Bharhut •
Mandasor
.
Devnimori
Ujjain •
Major Buddhist Sites Active in the Deccan, 200 BCE-400 CE
.Eran Sanchi • Vidisha ( Besnaga r) Sonari: Bhojpur" • Andher
Na:rmada
r B•ryg,>ra ''"''""''
.
]'llpt;
Nagpur
Atqh
Qlzq,
tq·
• Pauni • Ajanta
Nasik "
Pitalkhora • 0 Bhokardan •Ellora
E
C
C
A
}\r
Udayagiri •
Sapara
Kanh 10• e
• Paithan x Naneghat Pass °Kalyan • Junnar • Ahmednagar Karla"0 . Bedsa Chaul Bhaja-
D
.
Dhulikatta Karimnagar .
J