The Red Pill

Citation preview

Red Pill: The Marriage of Catholicism, National Socialism and Misogyny Sarai Iehanne van Beeuwelan, Steward Ceannt Gallagher, Steward " There are certain things which are human nature," he asserted with an owl-like look, "which always have been and always will be, which can't be changed." Amory looked from the small man to the big man helplessly. "Listen to that! That's what makes me discouraged with progress. Listen to that! I can name offhand over one hundred natural phenomena that have been changed by the will of man - a hundred instincts in man that have been wiped out or are now held in check by civilization. What this man here just said has been for thousands of years the last refuge of the associated mutton-heads of the world. It negates the efforts of every scientist, statesman, moralist, reformer, doctor, and philosopher that ever gave his life to humanity's service. It's a flat impeachment of all that's worth while in human nature. Every person over twenty-five years old who makes that statement in cold blood ought to be deprived of the franchise." - F. Scott Fitzgerald. This Side of Paradise Many ideas are bred in ignorance of reality. We look patronizingly at our remote ancestors, hiding in the branches of their trees in a thunderstorm, screaming in terror and the braver ones shaking their fists at the darkened sky. Perhaps after the storm made its way across the savannah, one of the elders of the troupe counseled the brash young ones who'd shaken their fists at the sky: One time my uncle, who was a young buck like yourself, stood in the top of the tree and shook his fist at the roaring in the sky. A great fire swooped down and burned him, everyone in the tree and the tree itself in one great loud noise. You would do well to remember that the next time such a thing happens. The Sky Person is all-powerful. Some 500,000 generations later we feel that we've come a ways from what was a belief formed in ignorance - ignorance of science, ignorance of what causes us fear and why, ignorance that we can only excuse because of the immense distance between us and our proto-hominid ancestors. In the interim we have blindly evolved to where and what we are now. Alas, ignorance is still with us and it never fails to push its ugly head up through the slime whenever we make a small step forward, to extend the light of the campfire further into the reaches of the unknown jungle of the universe beyond our current ken.

Beginning in the 19th century, we saw the rise of the emancipation of women. The Mormons gave the vote to women in the Utah territory in 1870. "Emancipation" is a word which you may (rightly) associate with the other major issue of that era: slavery. Up until then, in most places around the world, women were slaves - to men. Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, introduction: " After considering the historic page, and viewing the living world with anxious solicitude, the most melancholy emotions of sorrowful indignation have depressed my spirits, and I have sighed when obliged to confess, that either nature has made a great difference between man and man, or that the civilization, which has hitherto taken place in the world, has been very partial. I have turned over various books written on the subject of education, and patiently observed the conduct of parents and the management of schools; but what has been the result? a profound conviction, that the neglected education of my fellow creatures is the grand source of the misery I deplore; and that women in particular, are rendered weak and wretched by a variety of concurring causes, originating from one hasty conclusion. The conduct and manners of women, in fact, evidently prove, that their minds are not in a healthy state; for, like the flowers that are planted in too rich a soil, strength and usefulness are sacrificed to beauty; and the flaunting leaves, after having pleased a fastidious eye, fade, disregarded on the stalk, long before the season when they ought to have arrived at maturity. One cause of this barren blooming I attribute to a false system of education, gathered from the books written on this subject by men, who, considering females rather as women than human creatures, have been more anxious to make them alluring mistresses than rational wives; and the understanding of the sex has been so bubbled by this specious homage, that the civilized women of the present century, with a few exceptions, are only anxious to inspire love, when they ought to cherish a nobler ambition, and by their abilities and virtues exact respect." John Stuart Mill, The Subjugation of Women, introduction: "If the authority of men over women, when first established, had been the result of a conscientious comparison between different modes of constituting the government of society; if, after trying various other modes of social organization — the government of women over men, equality between the two, and such

mixed and divided modes of government as might be invented — it had been decided, on the testimony of experience, that the mode in which women are wholly under the rule of men, having no share at all in public concerns, and each in private being under the legal obligation of obedience to the man with whom she has associated her destiny, was the arrangement most conducive to the happiness and well being of both; its general adoption might then be fairly thought to be some evidence that, at the time when it was adopted, it was the best: though even then the considerations which recommended it may, like so many other primeval social facts of the greatest importance, have subsequently, in the course of ages, ceased to exist. But the state of the case is in every respect the reverse of this. In the first place, the opinion in favor of the present system, which entirely subordinates the weaker sex to the stronger, rests upon theory only ; for there never has been trial made of any other: so that experience, in the sense in which it is vulgarly opposed to theory, cannot be pretended to have pronounced any verdict. And in the second place, the adoption of this system of inequality never was the result of deliberation, or forethought, or any social ideas, or any notion whatever of what conduced to the benefit of humanity or the good order of society". Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Declaration of Sentiments, 1848: " The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world. He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise. He has compelled her to submit to laws, in the formation of which she had no voice. He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men - both natives and foreigners. Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen, the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides. He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead. He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns. He has made her morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many

crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master - the law giving him power to deprive her of her liberty, and to administer chastisement. He has so framed the laws of divorce, as to what shall be the proper causes of divorce, in case of separation, to whom the guardianship of the children shall be given; as to be wholly regardless of the happiness of the women - the law, in all cases, going upon a false supposition of the supremacy of man, and giving all power into his hands. After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single and the owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which recognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it. He has monopolized nearly all the profitable employments, and from those she is permitted to follow, she receives but a scanty remuneration. He closes against her all the avenues to wealth and distinction, which he considers most honorable to himself. As a teacher of theology, medicine, or law, she is not known. He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education - all colleges being closed against her. He allows her in church, as well as State, but a subordinate position, claiming Apostolic authority for her exclusion from the ministry, and, with some exceptions, from any public participation in the affairs of the Church. He has created a false public sentiment by giving to the world a different code of morals for men and women, by which moral delinquencies which exclude women from society, are not only tolerated but deemed of little account in man. He has usurped the prerogative of Jehovah himself, claiming it as his right to assign for her a sphere of action, when that belongs to her conscience and her God. He has endeavored, in every way that he could to destroy her confidence in her own powers, to lessen her self-respect, and to make her willing to lead a dependent and abject life. Now, in view of this entire disfranchisement of one-half the people of this country, their social and religious degradation, - in view of the unjust laws above mentioned, and because women do feel themselves aggrieved, oppressed, and fraudulently deprived of their most sacred rights, we insist that they have immediate admission to all the rights and privileges which belong to them as citizens of these United States."

Germaine Greer, feminist, from various sources: "Until women themselves reject stigma and refuse to feel shame for the way others treat them, they have no hope of achieving full human stature......women have no idea how much men hate them......The housewife is an unpaid employee in her husband's house in return for the security of being a permanent employee......All societies on the verge of death are masculine. A society can survive with only one man; no society will survive a shortage of women." Dee Snyder, lead singer with Twisted Sister: "We're not gonna take it, We're not gonna take it, We're not gonna take it anymore!" We're Not Gonna Take It, 1977 So we stumbled upon the Red Pill boys. They claim that women are biologically hardwired to use men for their sexual prowess, their income-earning ability, their ability to provide them with children and the means to raise them in financial security - and then to dispose of them like so much used trash. One of their favorite tropes is the Black Widow Spider, who eats her male partner once he's done his job of fertilizing her eggs. They sometimes utilize the similar practice exhibited by the Preying Mantis. Somehow they've managed to bring humanity down to the biological level of arachnids and insects. Perhaps they themselves are little more than bugs; I don't know about you, but my upbringing taught me that one should squash bugs; after all, they're just so nasty. However I've learned to live and let live for the most part: scorpions may need immediate dispatching if they're a real and present danger to your family or yourself; roaches are in my world something for the pest exterminator to work on; bees, butterflies, dragonflies, beetles, have as much right to live as anything else. The Red Pill boys - and they're all of them boys - in our estimation here are in the roach portion of the spectrum. We've yet to engage one of these troglodytes in a meaningful dialog. They're impervious to reason, to history, to science and I have strong suspicion that if the world were their way women would be slaves, bought, sold and disposed when their usefulness (as bed-mates and brood hens) comes to an end. Their ideas smack roundly of ancient and medieval Roman Catholicism. I've yet to

see them give credit to the Church for their ideas, but intellectual honesty is not one of their strong points. Origen, Christian theologian, 185 - 254 CE, On Women's Clothing: "And do you not know that you are (each) an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert - that is, death - even the Son of God had to die." note: Origen had himself castrated when he was a young man. What Origen is referring to in his phrase "the sentence of God' is the curse of God in the Biblical fable of the Fall of Man, which is worth quoting in full: "[1] Now the serpent was more crafty than any animal of the field that Yahweh God had made. He said to the woman, “Has God really said, ‘You must not eat of any tree of the garden?’” [2] The woman said to the serpent, “Of the fruit of the trees of the garden we may eat, [3] but of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘You must not eat of it, neither must you touch it, lest you die.’” [4] The serpent said to the woman, “You won’t surely die; [5] for God knows that in the day you eat it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” [6] When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she gave some to her husband with her, and he ate. [7] The eyes of both of them were opened, and they knew that they were naked. They sewed fig leaves together and made themselves aprons. [8] They heard the sound of Yahweh God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and the man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of Yahweh God among the trees of the garden. [9] Yahweh God called to the man and said to him, “Where are you?” [10] The man said, “I heard the sound of you in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.” [11] God said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?” [12] The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.” [13] Yahweh God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.” [14] Yahweh God said to the

serpent, “Because you have done this, you are cursed above all livestock and above every animal of the field. On your belly you will go, and you will eat dust all the days of your life. [15] I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring. He will bruise your head, and you will bruise his heel.” [16] To the woman he said, “I will greatly multiply your pain in childbirth. In pain you will bear children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” [17] To Adam he said, “Because you have listened to your wife’s voice and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you, saying, ‘You must not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground for your sake. In toil you will eat of it all the days of your life. [18] It will yield thorns and thistles to you, and you will eat the herb of the field. [19] By the sweat of your face will you eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken. For you are dust, and to dust you will return.” [20] The man called his wife Eve, because she was the mother of all living. [21] Yahweh God made coats of skins for Adam and for his wife and clothed them. [22] Yahweh God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and also take of the tree of life and eat, and live forever–” [23] Therefore Yahweh God sent him out from the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken. [24] So he drove out the man, and he placed Cherubs at the east of the garden of Eden, and the flame of a sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life." Genesis, Chapter 3, entire, Revised English Version Albertus Magnus, Christian theologian, 1200 - 1280 CE, Quaestiones super de animalibus 15 q. 11: "Woman is less qualified [than man] for moral behavior. For the woman contains more liquid than the man, and it is a property of liquid to take things up easily and to hold onto them poorly. Liquids are easily moved, hence women are inconstant and curious. When a woman has relations with a man, she would like, as much as possible, to be lying with another man at the same time. Woman knows nothing of fidelity. Believe me, if you give her your trust, you will be disappointed. Trust an experienced teacher. For this reason prudent men share their plans and actions least of all with their wives. Woman is a misbegotten man and has a faulty and defective nature in comparison with his. Therefore she is unsure in herself. What she herself cannot get, she seeks to obtain through lying and diabolical deceptions. And so, to put it briefly, one must be on one's guard with every woman, as if she were a poisonous snake and the

horned devil.... In evil and perverse doings woman is cleverer, that is, slyer, than man. Her feelings drive woman toward every evil, just as reason impels man toward all good." Thomas Aquinas, Christian theologian, 1225 - 1274 CE, Summa Theologia 1 q. 92 a. 1: "Woman is defective and misbegotten, for the active force in the male seed tends to the production of a perfect likeness in the masculine sex; while the production of woman comes from defect in the active force or from some material indisposition, or even from some external influence, such as that of a south wind, which is moist."

It is not the purpose of this essay to outline the whole history of the JudeoChristian-Islamic tradition in regard to how women were perceived in the West and a good chunk of the East; suffice it to say that since the book of Genesis was patched together by Judaean priesthood at some in the fourth century BCE,

women have been regarded as inferior and as agents of the Devil. This is the sort of thing that should make every Red Pill boy shout in agreement.

Adolph Hitler had similar views: "The slogan "emancipation of women" was invented by Jewish intellectuals. If the man's world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman's in a smaller world. For her world is her husband, her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for the smaller one? The great world cannot survive if the smaller world is not stable. We do not consider it correct for the women to interfere in the world of the man. We consider it natural if these two worlds remain distinct." This was in a speech which he gave to the NSDAP Women's Organization in 1934. One more from a speech he made in 1935: "The so-called granting of equal rights to women, which Marxism demands, in reality does not grant equal rights but constitutes a deprivation of rights, since it draws the woman into an area in which she will necessarily be inferior. The woman has her own battlefield. With every child that she brings into the world, she fights her battle for the nation." (Source: http://spartacus-educational.com/GERwomen.htm This is misogyny, or hatred of women. Call it what you like, it is all a way of mind, a way of life, to keep women as child-bearers, sex slaves and secondclass citizens. The Red Pill boys - after all, they aren't men, not real men bemoan women's rights and feminism in general. They'll have their say in a moment. If you're a Red Pill, or a MGTOW, or other misogynist reading this, I'll point out that this is the way you view you mothers, sisters, wives (if you have one). Your mother is a slut in service of the devil, your sister is a whore out to devour every man with whom she has sex. That's what you're saying - boys. Well, what did Karl Marx have to say about women? from the Communist Manifesto (co-authored with Friedrich Engels in 1848) chapter 2:

"'But you Communists would introduce community of women!, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus. The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women. He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production. For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial. Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives. Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private."

Pictures following of are Origen, Thomas Aquinas, Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Gloria Steinem and the cover of Germaine Greer's The Female Eunuch. All images are derived from Wikimedia Commons and are used under Creative Commons license.

Red Pill lie #1: "One of the major problems that gives rise to people needing the red pill is that society tells absolute lies about women. Our culture repeats the pervasive myth that women are pure, good, and honorable...." see http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/29ki6i/the_direction_of_the_red_p ill_and_a_welcome/ No footnotes or source literature cited Red Pill lie #2: "You might think some of the phrases we use are offensive, but that doesn't change their meanings and definitions. A woman can be a slut and ride the cock-carousel until she hits the wall and lands some beta-bux. Sounds like we hate women, does it? Well, that's their sexual strategy-- take it or leave it." ibid, and again, no sources cited. Red Pill lie #3 "Women cannot stand the idea of men getting together like this and discussing what we do. It doesn't matter what the subject, or how politically correct we make it - women want to infiltrate male spaces and ensure they can define the tone, moderate the text, and modify our message. It's already well accepted that men's rights is a group that tries as hard as it can to be politically correct so women don't get mad at them. And guess what- it doesn't work. They're still considered a hate group. The men there go so far to supplicate women, they tell them "women are welcome! Let's modify our tone so that women feel more welcome!!" And no matter how far you push, and no matter how much you change- women will never be happy with it. Because women aren't looking for satisfaction, they're looking for control." ibid, no sources cited. Red Pill lie #4: "Yes, the red pill is about self improvement. But it's also about understanding the dark and sometimes unfriendly nature of the real world so you can adapt properly. It's not improvement for improvement's sake. It's improvement to gain better footing for success - sexually, professionally, and in any other endeavors

you take. Do not sugar coat this truth - many of our improvements are not politically correct, and you shouldn't give a fuck otherwise." ibid ________________________________________________________________ I don't know whether to laugh or barf or both. These boys really believe that they have a handle on human sexuality when in reality the only thing they're likely to have a hand on are their own cocks. They write like very tough sixthgraders. Which is about where they are on the spectrum of human and intellectual development. "Our culture repeats the pervasive myth that women are pure, good and honorable." I refer the reader to our quotes from the Old Testament and the Fathers of the Church. "A woman can be a slut and ride the cock-carousel until she hits the wall and lands some beta-bux." I suppose this writer means his mother, sisters, daughters? And he means to include all women in this lumpen antiproletariat: nuns, lesbians, transexual male-tofemales, your mother and mine and his. "Women cannot stand the idea of men getting together like this and discussing what we do." Here he's giving himself and his fellow Red Pill boys too much credit; generally women and intelligent men can't take this bullshit seriously. It's misogyny with a voice - shrill, lying, ahistorical and lost in some vapid lala land where men all get laid and women don't matter. As a gay man, let me ask you cowards: How would you like to be treated in the way that you'd like to treat women? (I emphasize "would like to treat women" because it's more than obvious that you all seem to have no women to treat - in other words, you all need to get laid. And if you can't attract a woman by the normal social channels, go to a prostitute.) You'd be crying like babies. Ceannt Gallagher ________________________________________________________________ One of the things which needs to be permanently laid to rest is this idea that sexual pleasure is a by-product of the sexual drive to procreate. Au contraire; this is an anthropomorphization of evolution. We are hard-wired to want sex. Evolution is not a conscious force; "it" did not say at some remote time in the past, "I'll trick living things into reproducing by making sex feel good." This may sound like a chicken-and-egg situation but it's not. If the sex drive existed solely for the propagation of species, then it follows that homosexuality couldn't exist. By now it's obvious that there are hundreds, perhaps now thousands, of

examples of "animal homosexuality" as recorded by ethologists and zoologists. Animals supposedly can't rationalize their desires, and this is certainly true in a sense; animals can't speak or write or otherwise manipulate symbols in order that their feelings, emotions and thoughts might be known to we humans. True, there are exceptions among certain species of birds, but don't wait to see a book written by a parrot or crow. Sigmund Freud spelled out the three drives which are the motors behind all human endeavor: the need for sleep, food and sex. As for sex: "......[the sex drive / libido] is the energy, regarded as a quantitative magnitude ... of those instincts which have to do with all that may be comprised under the word 'love.' He wrote this in his Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse on 1921. We of the Outlands Community have always insisted that emotional love springs from sexual desire and if it was obvious to Freud it ought be universally obvious, but the Roman Catholic Church decided early on that sexual desire was an evil and that people should have sex only for the sake of begetting offspring. What the Church did was to insinuate the idea that we have this drive solely for making babies. At this point I can't help but comment that the Christian deity was more perverse than any of his creations by making sex seem so wonderful when in fact it's a great evil. Among many others, Saint Augustine disagreed with his boss when he wrote, "I don't see what sort of help woman was created to provide man with, if one excludes the purpose of procreation. If woman was not given to man for help in bearing children, for what help could she be? To till the earth together? If help were needed for that, man would have been a better help for man. The same goes for comfort in solitude. How much more pleasure is it for life and conversation when two friends live together than when a man and a woman cohabitate?" Augustine of Hippo, Christian theologian, 354 - 430 CE, De genesi ad litteram, 9, 5-9 Perhaps Augustine didn't have a mother? But I'm being sarcastic. All of this nonsense is making my brain hurt. In hoc signo transit Sarai Iehanne van Beeuwelan