The Real Anthony Fauci interview of Robert Kennedy Jr. on The Corbett Report

Citation preview

The Real Anthony Fauci Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - Corbett Report interview https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/The-RealAnthony-Fauci-with-Robert-F.-Kennedy,-Jr.-Corbett-Report:a November 19, 2021 RFK: So I would say this is Armageddon. It is the apocalyptic forces of ignorance and greed and totalitarianism. And this is the final battle. We need to win this one. James: Welcome friends. James Corbett here. Corbett reports. In a conversation that is being recorded on the 19th of November 2021 here in Japan, and throughout the past couple of years of this generated crisis, I have received, as you might imagine, many, many requests to do some sort of deep dive or exposé on the face of this generated crisis in the United States. Anthony Fauci. But as a Canadian in Japan, I have never felt it is that I am best situated to do such a deep dive. Luckily, I can do the next best thing, actually an even better thing. I can bring on someone who has done exactly just such an exposé and has just released that to the public. I am talking about, of course, thought criminal extraordinaire and proud member of the disinformation dozen. I say that ironically, of course, Robert F Kennedy Jr of Children's Health Defense.org who has just written The Real Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. Mr. Robert F Kennedy, Jr. Thank you very much for joining us on the program today. RFK: And thank you for having me, James, and also thank you for all of your extraordinary work for keeping the public informed so that we can actually maybe restore some democracy to the world. James: Well, I appreciate that. Let's start by talking about the sort of the cultural moment that we're in, in which I note as we're recording this conversation, it's the 18th of November there in the United States as we are talking. This book The Real Anthony Fauci, is currently the number three

bestseller on Amazon right now, which people should not be lining the pockets of Jeff Bezos, obviously, but I think speaks to the fact that obviously something is happening in the zeitgeist right now where this information, speaking obviously specifically about Anthony Fauci, but in a similar way, I would say to my Who is Bill Gates documentary using Fauci as a hub from which we can explore many spokes of the crisis that we're living through right now. Obviously, people are hungry for this information at the moment. But first, can you just speak to why you decided to write this book specifically about Fauci? RFK: But I think for the same reasons you've been exploring what we've seen over the past 20 months, a coup d'etat against liberal democracy globally. And one of the key players is kind of medical cartel and medical technocracy. There's a there's an entire coalition of what I think we are all starting to see sinister forces, pharmaceutical companies, the intelligence agencies, medical bureaucracies, social media titans and the mainstream media that are all wrapped up in the military. If I didn't mention them that are all kind of wrapped up and the obliteration of constitutional rights globally and the subversion, the use of a health crisis to impose totalitarian controls. And one of the ways they've been able to get rid of it is that it's kind of avuncular presence is the face of the technocracy, in the face of that of the militia and the obliteration of constitutional rights as avuncular, steady, authoritative medical figure. Anthony Fauci, who is and the leading pan germ of the medical establishment for 50 years, he's kind of the J. Edgar Hoover of Public Health without J. Edgar Hoover’s a bad reputation. And he has been the trusted adviser to six presidents and is a person who is widely applauded. And his opinions, as little as his medical opinions, as little sense as they make, are treated literally as gospel by the mainstream press, the social media globally. And many, unfortunately, people of my from my political party, from the Democratic Party, who really see him as almost a demigod. And because of my peculiar history, which I have spent 40 years litigating on the issue of regulatory capture. I wrote over 500 lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies and big corporations, and probably a quarter of the lawsuits that I brought have been against government agencies like the EPA that are subject to this dynamic of regulatory capture, which is very, very well documented in peer reviewed publications and the popular press. But it's the mechanism by which regulatory agencies become the sock puppet of the industries that they're supposed to regulate. They become really kind of subsidiaries of those industries. And Tony Fauci is kind of the spearhead of an agency that has experienced regulatory capture in a way that

is on steroids. And part of the reason is that these unprecedented financial entanglements between the pharmaceutical companies and the agencies that they regulate that we do not see in the environmental space. EPA is a captured agency. It does the bidding of big oil, big coal, the chemical industry, the big industrial agriculture. And I spent a lot of time suing them when they did sweetheart deals to issue permits that were illegal. But in the pharmaceutical and the medical sphere, you have these financial links. For example, FDA receives 45% of its annual budget from pharmaceutical companies. The NIH has thousands of pharmaceutical patents, and the CDC spends about $4.9 billion a year out of its $12 billion budget, so about 40%, close to 40% buying and then distributing vaccines. So it really is the front man. It is the biggest vaccine company in the world. And the metrics that are used within the agencies to measure of whether or not you're going to get promoted and whether you're going to get advanced or whether you're going to get your bonuses and salary raises, almost all of them have to do with how well you promote vaccine uptake. People do not get rewarded in those agencies for finding problems with vaccines. They get rewarded for covering up problems. And then some of the agencies directly profit from vaccine sales. For example, as I said, NIH owns thousands of medical patents, including half the patent for the Moderna vaccine. So it stands to make that agency make billions and billions, Tony Fauci's agency, billions and billions of dollars, if they succeed in getting that vaccine approved and mandated, etc.. And Tony Fauci was able to choose, to designate four of his high level employees who each get individual patent shares, and they will collect $150,000 a year for life if the Moderna vaccine is approved, which it has been. So it's kind of like I said, it's like if EPA got half of its budget on the coal industry or from the oil industry, and that the amount of money that went into his budget was based upon sales of coal and oil would really contaminate, it subsume the regulatory and the mercantile impulses and the commercial impulses would subsume the regulatory functions and that's exactly what's happened. They are no longer regulatory agencies. They are not public health agencies. They are vaccine and pharmaceutical companies. And Tony Fauci, as you know, his agency in particular no longer does public health. And he doesn't do public health. He does pharmaceutical promotions. He will never talk about the improvements in public health that have occurred since he came into office 50 years ago. And it's not a good story. We've gone from 6% of the American public having chronic disease when he entered to by 1986, he became the boss, the big boss in 86 and 11.6% or 11.8% of Americans had chronic disease and today, 54%. So, and by chronic disease, I mean neurological diseases, ADHD, ADHD speech, a language like Tourette syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, autism, allergic disease like peanut allergies, food allergies, asthma, anaphylaxis, and then the autoimmune diseases like juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis. When

Anthony Fauci took over that agency nobody had even heard of those diseases, really. You know, one in 10,000 people my age have autism, one in every 34 children, people my kids age have full blown autism. And Tony Fauci, his job is to make sure that doesn't happen find the sources of those chronic diseases. Where did food allergies suddenly appear in 1989? Why do we see all these people with celiac disease and peanut allergies beginning in that year? Why don't we see rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile diabetes? Clearly, there is an environmental toxin. Genes do not cause epidemic. They may provide the vulnerability, but you need an environmental toxin and his job is to identify the toxins so that we can then eliminate it. That's what he does. And as a result, we've seen this dramatic explosion, a decline in public health. We have the worst infant mortality rate of the top 25 nations. When he came into office, we were with healthiest people. Today, we're the unhealthiest people in the industrialized world. We're 79th in terms of the overall public health metrics. We consume three times the pharmaceutical products of any other Western nation. We pay the highest prices and we are by far the sickest. And it's largely, as I show in the book, Tony Fauci is responsible. He's not the solely responsible. He, however, could have prevented the whole thing. His job was to identify those problems and lead the way to do eliminating them. And he could have done that. And that's not what he's doing. He's turned that agency into an incubator for pharmaceutical products. Between 2009 and 2016, or some 240 products approved by FDA new drugs. That all came out of his shop. He has a seven he has a $6.1 billion budget, which he distributes to colleges and universities, to drug research for various diseases. He has another 1.7 billion that comes from the military that essentially is to do bioweapons research and that's why he had to do the gain of function. He was locked into that because 68% of his personal salary comes from doing that military bioweapons research, which used to be called dual use. It's illegal for anybody to do bio weapons development and manufacturing, but there's an exemption in the 1972 Act for research and development that is for dual use, in other words, it's research that could be used for useful for developing bio weapons, but it also is useful for vaccines. So if you can say I'm doing vaccine research, then you can do bioweapons research. Back to our bioweapons research. And that's what he did. After the anthrax attacks in 2001, the Pentagon and the CIA began pouring money into bioweapons research, and the Pentagon was nervous about doing it itself because of the ban, the prohibition on it. So those cohorts began funneling money to Tony Fauci to do it because he could legitimately say, well, I'm not really doing bioweapons research, I'm doing vaccine research. And then a bunch of his little bugs escaped in 2014 from his lab and from other people's labs.

Three hundred scientists signed a letter to President Obama asking them to stop Tony Fauci. And that's when he began funneling a lot of this money to the Wuhan lab and partnering with Chinese military scientists and teaching them not only how to how to develop, how to take bat coronaviruses and make them transmissible and pathogenic and virulent to human beings. One of his chief scientists, Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina, had developed a technique called the no-see-um technique [U.S. Patent 7618802] for hiding the engineering evidence of the human engineering of those viruses. And Baric, who is funded by Fauci, then shared that research with Sheng Jin, the Chinese scientist, his Bat Lady, and was able to master the technique. These people are all publishing on this stuff and they weren't embarrassed about it and the Chinese were very, very open that this was weapons research. They didn't pretend it was vaccine research. They were like, this is weapons research and we are glad we're able to do it. And Fauci was giving them millions and millions of dollars. The biggest contributor was the CIA, which gave about $69 million through USAID to do that kind of research. And then the Pentagon through DARPA, which gave about $39 million to do that, and the three of them were all working in tandem, U.S. agencies with smaller amounts coming from Homeland Security and the other agencies, and they were teaching the Chinese how to how to weaponize bat viruses. James: Well, let's stop for a moment because describing Anthony Fauci as the J. Edgar Hoover of Public Health is such a perfect description that I'm going to steal it, because I think it gets to the heart of what we're discussing here, which is that this man has somehow or other managed to take over a relative backwater of the Washington bureaucracy. As you point out, in 1984, who was talking about NIAID? No one, it was a nothing agency. It is now … RFK: Because infectious disease had basically stopped causing mortalities after the Spanish flu. And the Spanish flu was not a flu as Tony Fauci himself wrote in 2008. He really documented the fact it was a bacteriological infection. So there's no reason to be scared of it anymore because it can be obliterated in two days by antibiotics. So really in this century you've seen the complete decline of infectious disease mortality. By 1980 infectious disease mortalities were such an infinitesimal threat to Americans that the Reagan administration was talking about abolishing NIAID and CDC here and in those agencies they were talking about, we got

to find a pandemic in order to justify our existence. And I show in the book again and again they fabricated pandemics. They fabricated a flu pandemic in 1976 and in 2005, an avian flu pandemic, swine flu in 2009, complete fabrication. And in 2005, one person died in a pandemic and they spent $40 billion on vaccines and had mandatory vaccine programs globally. And they do this again and I show again and again. Zika was a phony, Tony Fauci, phony pandemic. Zika was completely not associated with microcephaly and he went to Congress and said, like kids to be born with small heads and he got $2.2 billion, his agency to get a vaccine and as it turns out it was no threat to anybody and definitely did not cause microcephaly. It was all fabricated. And he's done this again and again and again, the same playbook to use it to clamp down totalitarian controls and to sell pharmaceutical products that use these fake pandemics. And I'm not saying COVID is fake because it isn’t, but the response to it has not been a medical response. It's been a militarized and a monetized response that is very, very much precalculated. James: Well, let's get into the specifics of how this type of scare can be manipulated, because that's something that we need to wrap our minds around to understand what's happening right now. And in Chapter four of your book, in fact, several chapters deal with Fauci's involvement in the AIDS crisis and AZT and that scandal. But in Chapter four of your book, you specifically go through how the AIDS crisis that Fauci was at the helm of there in the 1980s was essentially the template for what was to come during the generated crisis of the past two years. And you talk about pumping up pandemic fears to lay the groundwork for larger budgets and greater powers, incriminating and elusive pathogen, fanning hysteria by exaggerating disease trends. Transmissibility periodically stoking waning fear levels by warning of mutant super strains and future surges, etc., etc.. There's a list of about 20 different ways in which the AIDS crisis can be seen as a template for what has happened over the past couple of years. Can you elaborate a bit about that? RFK: One of the things that he did during the AIDS crisis, he captured, he was able to go through a struggle with National Cancer Institute because the initial signal of AIDS was Kaposi's sarcoma, which is a cancer. And so the AIDS went to the National Cancer Institute, and he was able to use studies that show that maybe it's a viral infection caused by HIV, to get control of all that new funding. And he went up to billions of dollars and that really made him the boss. But what he did, he didn't know how to develop drugs, and the NIAID no capacity at that time to develop drugs. National Cancer Institute did, had new big labs, and it was developing cancer drugs. His

agency didn't know how, so it really had to rely on a private pharmaceutical company, which is now Glaxo Wellcome-SmithKline Beecham. Welcome had a drug that appeared to kill HIV. It killed HIV because it killed everything that it touched. It was a really toxic chemotherapy drug. It was so toxic, it killed all the mice in the chemotherapy experiment and the guy who developed it actually threw it on a junk pile and didn't even bother with it because he said this can never be used. Chemotherapy, you give it for two weeks and it kills every cell in the DNA in human bodies. But you're hoping that it kills the tumor first before it kills the person. It was Toni Fauci’s idea to give that chemotherapy to people for life, which, of course, it means their life was going to be extremely short, which is exactly what happened. And he had to shorten the experiment, the clinical trial, because within six weeks it was killing everybody and the clinical trial and the way he kept them alive was by pumping the people in the in the AZT group with daily in some cases blood transfusions and not giving the transfusions to the HIV infected people in the placebo group. Transfusions kept them alive, allowed him to claim this was a miracle drug, and he got it approved at record time. It was a rush emergency use approval. And at the end, he declares it's a fact that it's unethical to continue the trials and we're going to unblind them and give it to all the people in the placebo group, exactly what he did with the vaccines. By that time there where community doctors all over America that were finding repurposed drugs that were really effective against the symptoms of AIDS, things that actually killed people, the pneumonia and all of these other symptoms that killed people. And he had to in order to get his idea approved for emergencies, he had to kill those drugs. So he suppressed them. He punished doctors who were… he wouldn't he wouldn't allow FDA to approve any of them. He would not allow Fast-Track approval. My uncle was fighting with them and fighting with them. Ted Kennedy, who was the chair of the health committee to force him to do a Fast-Track approvals for those drugs these wonderful community doctors were using. And what happened is people who had AIDS were quickly recognizing that AZT was killing their friends who got on it. And they were desperate to get these other drugs. And so they had these buyers clubs that popped up all over the country. And the movie Dallas Buyers Club was originally written about Tony Fauci as the villain, because he was the one that was preventing all these people from getting their hands on these working medications because there was no profits in them for the drug industry. And so you had these buyers clubs where people are going to Mexico and they go to Europe or they go to Canada and they get these drugs and bring them back and

distribute them to people. And so it's the same thing he did now with suppressing ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, monoclonal steroids all of the things that we know are very effective against COVID, anti-inflammatories, the anticoagulants, the antibiotics that work actually work, vitamin D, the zinc and all those things get suppressed. So there is only one solution. Back then it was AZT for AIDS. Today, it's the vaccine. It's always a deadly experimental drug that wipes out disease and he has to abbreviate the clinical trials and declare it's a success.That's just one of the times he's done that again and again and again and again throughout his long career. James: Right. As you say in the book, it's a well-worn dog eared playbook that he's playing from precisely because it has worked in the past and it's continuing to work to this day. As you say, his avuncular attitude, and it sort of deflects all the criticism that never seems to really land on him. But you paint a very vivid picture in this book of a particular instance of how Fauci has wielded his power over his fiefdom to suppress dissent against him. And that was the story of Dr. Peter Duesberg. Tell people about how the career of Peter Duesberg was completely derailed by Fauci. RFK: Well, Duesberg was probably was the most brilliant virologist in the world. He'd won more NIH awards than anybody else. He'd won virtually every award that could be won in virology. And he was clearly going to win the Nobel Prize for finding an oncogene, which is a cancer causing gene and which he discovered. And it launched an entire discipline in virology. And then he himself went back and looked at it and he said, this doesn't make any sense from an evolutionary point of view. And he wrote the paper that exploded his own theory and lost him the Nobel Prize. But he didn't care about anything except integrity. And he was really, and he is still alive, this incredible and highly, highly respected scientist. And he did not believe that the deaths that were being attributed to AIDS from 81 to 84, he did not believe that they were being caused by HIV. He believed that they were largely the result of poppers and a whole constellation of drugs, of heroin, speed, methadrine, cocaine that were part of the abstract imposed on a gay lifestyle. And if you looked at it, what he was saying is now accepted science. It's Kaposi's sarcoma, which was AIDS, is no longer even listed as a symptom of AIDS. It's now understood that it is an environmental result and that it's caused by poppers, which is Pentyl nitrite, which was a ubiquitous drug that was used in the gay community. It was sold in every gay bar. And at the end of the night, the gay bars would declare last call for alcohol, last call for poppers. It was sold in the bathhouses and the nightclubs and everything else. And all of the people, 100% of the people originally

diagnosed with AIDS were popper users. And so he, Duesberg, did this exhaustive research and published a groundbreaking paper and then became a huge critic of Fauci. And I show in my book Fauci was able to use strategically placed money, he has control of all of this research, $6.1 billion in research grants to get the universities to shut him out, to get him denied all awards, invitations to conferences, to punish his graduate students so nobody would take his courses and to destroy his career. And he succeeded in doing that. He really isolated and he made Duesberg a pariah. And he refused to debate him. He refused. He silenced him. And that's the problem. Whether Duesberg was correct or not, I don't reach a conclusion on that specifically. I don't know. But Duesberg’s arguments make a lot of sense if you read them and his book is absolutely persuasive. That doesn't mean… there were tens of thousands of articles on AIDS and HIV, and I haven't read them all, so I'm not eligible or competent to make a judgment. But what I do know is that science is dynamic and there ought to be debate. And at any time somebody says there's a consensus in science, that person is a liar and they're manipulating because the phrase scientific consensus is oxymoronic. I was part of the legal team on the Monsanto case where we won $2.2 billion. We won three cases in a row. And then we settled with Roundup. And in that case, Monsanto came to court with top scientists in the country from Harvard and Stanford, and they made very, very convincing presentations on what they said was consensus science. And then we brought all our scientists from Harvard and Stanford who were looking at the same data and coming up with a different conclusion. And under crossexamination, we were able to prove that their scientists were wrong, are right, and persuade a jury to give these huge judgments. *pt2 start And so medicine is about consultations, about debate. It's about conversation. It's not about one guy standing up there and say, this is the answer. And if we want good policies for everything in a democracy and we need it free flow of information and we need ideas to triumph in the marketplace. And what Fauci has succeeded in doing in this country is really shutting down debate completely. And this extraordinary capacities that he's developed, relationships with the media, the social media, and the whole army, the medical cartel and intelligence agencies to literally shut down debate on any issue that he wants to simply proclaim as truth. James: Let's move on to another part. I know we have limited time today, and I want to cover what you talk about in Chapter seven of your book, because I'm sure everyone by this point has heard, and if not, they should at

least look it up about BeagleGate, as it has been termed, and the horrific experiments on animals that were funded through Fauci's agency. But not a lot of people have probably heard about what you cover in Chapter seven of this book, Dr. Fauci. Mr. Hyde. NIAID's barbaric and illegal experiments on children, which for me personally, as a father of two beautiful, wonderful, healthy children who I love more than life itself, this chapter was the most difficult to read through. But perhaps you can share some of this information with the listeners. RFK: Well, it's part of a pair of chapters. One of them about his experiments on children with these novel chemotherapy drugs that they were testing out for AIDS in the United States, and then the other one on children and pregnant mothers in Africa. And they were both just equally horrific. And in the United States, the only way he got most of his experiment or he's targeted throughout his career, blacks and Hispanics for these kind of medical experiments. And in this case, he was able to get control of foster homes in seven states and essentially turn these pharmaceutical companies loose on these children. And the experiments that they were conducted were absolutely barbaric and the children were tortured. They did not have legal representation, which is illegal. They did not have guardians. You cannot put a child into a clinical trial in this country without an independent guardian. And he made sure that those kids did not have guardians and they were literally tortured to death. The children who refused, who stopped taking the drugs because they made them so sick, many of these kids did not have HIV or they were getting no benefit from these drugs. They were just being used as guinea pigs. And the children who refused or were noncompliant were sent to Columbia Hospital and had feeding tubes installed in them so that the drug companies could continue to administer the drugs even when the kids fought back. And at least 85 of these kids died during the experiments. Celia Farber was an incredible researcher who worked with me on this chapter in the book, actually found a graveyard up in Hudson Valley, north of New York City, in Hawthorne, New York. It's called Gates of Heaven Cemetery, where there was a pit. It was covered by a Astroturf carpet, and it had hundreds and hundreds of tiny coffins haphazardly piled in that pit with the bodies of these children. And we don't know where a lot of those kids came from, but we know that at least 85 of them, at least, where it came, were there were casualties of Tony Fauci's experiments. And then after New York, he took that roadshow to Africa and ended up killing a lot of pregnant mothers in Africa and getting away with it because of the power of his agency, his contacts. His whole thing fell apart at one point. But he was able to use his contacts with President Bush there, really to get him out of a jam. And I talk about that. I detail it, as you know,

there's 2200 footnotes in the book. Every statement in there is sourced inside government databases or to peer reviewed publications or to good sources. So the story's incredible. I think the most poignant story in the book is in the last chapter, which is called Germ Games, which talks about the orchestrated, planned use of pandemics to clampdown totalitarian control. And it was a surprise to me. It was all new research and nobody has seen this before. But the deep, deep involvement of the intelligence agencies and in pandemic planning, which is weird because the CIA is not a health agency. It doesn't do public health. It does coup d'etat. A lot of people know about Event 201, which was this extraordinary pandemic planning event, a simulation that was put on an October 2019. It was hosted by Bill Gates and by Avril Haines who was a former deputy director of the CIA. She's now the head of the National Security Agency, the top spy in our country. And the people were it's an extraordinary group of people. They were simulating a coronavirus pandemic worldwide in October 2019. What we now know from the National Security Agency is that the pandemic almost certainly escaped from the Wuhan lab on September 12th, and it was circulating already in Wuhan a month before this pandemic took place and the Chinese knew about it. And at the simulation, it was George Gao who was the head of the Chinese CDC, and then they had representatives from the drug companies, the social media companies, the mainstream media companies like Bloomberg and The Washington Post and health agencies. And they're simulating a pandemic and they're not simulating how do you get vitamin D to people and how do you get zinc and how do you stockpile kerosene? And how do you create grids of hooks, the $11 million in the world to figure out what protocols are working and what repurposed medications are working? How do you quarantine the sick and not healthy, how to preserve the constitution? None of that was discussed. 8min It was all how do you use the pandemic as a pretense to clamp down totalitarian controls and obliterate and deconstruct democracy? And the last simulation, which is called the seminar Floor, was all about how do you get the social media companies to censor any discussion of a lab generated coronavirus epidemic? It's pretty amazing when you like you're thinking, do they think we're stupid? What I found out in the book was that that was not a one off event, that they had probably around 20 of these events. I document, I think 14 of them beginning in 2000. They're called Operation Lockstep. It's how do you get all of the countries, all the liberal democracies in the world to pivot and turn into dictatorships overnight? And they're all, every one of

them, many of them are sponsored by Gates and at Johns Hopkins population center. But all of them, the one thing they all have in common is a huge, huge presence by the CIA. And they are all orchestrated. All the scripts are written by them. They're famous people involved in many of them, Madeleine Albright, Senator Frank Church, other senators and Congressmen, Gates. And they involved hundreds of thousands of people. So they involved not only health workers, but from the utilities, from the oil companies, from the police, firefighters in all the cities around our country, Canada, the United States or Europe, Australia. And they did them all simultaneously in all these countries. And it's really chilling, I think, for people to read. James: Yes, and I was impressed by the thoroughness of that chapter, actually. You uncovered a lot of detail about a lot of these different drills going all the way back to Dark Winter , which I'm sure my audience will be familiar with by now. But you have a lot of detail in there and how that then relates to the anthrax attacks of a few months later that were miraculously predicted by several of the people associated with Dark Winter. RFK: But the anthrax attacks happened. There were Senate hearings on the dark winter anthrax attacks. It had prepared the whole country for an anthrax attack weeks before the anthrax attack. And it turns out the anthrax attack, although they blame Saddam Hussein. and we went to war, it turned out when the FBI completed its investigations, it came from the one of three US military labs. And I talk about who the identity is of the people who were highly likely to have been involved. James: Exactly right. And you talk about the TOPOFF drills, which I haven't heard talked about since the 2000s. You even brought up, one that I had never heard of yet from Mars 2017. So I'm learning new stuff from that chapter as well. So lots and as you say, 2200 footnotes in this book. It is a treasure trove for researchers like myself, and I'm sure I will be making use of that research in my coming [Corbett] Reports. So thank you for doing that research. But let's take a look step back to sort of the bigger picture of what this book is about and what it represents because hopefully, I would sincerely hope, that this best-selling book will have an effect towards exposing Anthony Fauci and what he has been involved with over the years, the blood that is on his hands. And hopefully then, of course, prompting a resignation and a disgrace of that career. I would sincerely hope that, but I

would assume that's not the end goal of all of this, because, as I'm sure you know, if you got rid of Fauci, there would be 100 many Faucis willing to take his place. So what is that end goal? What are we actually reaching towards when we're confronting this coming biosecurity state? * 12.5m RFK: Well listen, I talk about the Milgram experiment as to about how the intelligence agencies and agencies really develop these extraordinary techniques for using fear to disable critical thinking. And if you look at the whole rationale behind this pandemic, all of these rationales collapse when you look at them. Why are we mandating vaccines that don't prevent transmission? What is the possible reason? And that's just one of many, many absurdities of what we're doing today. But people who are subsumed in the orthodoxy, which is the product of orchestrated fear, misinformation and propaganda, need to be woken up. And you have, as they learned in the Milgram experiment, 33% of people will violate their own conscience, their own deeply held values if they're ordered to do so by a medical authority. And I was able to connect for the first time in the Milgram experiment to the CIA and to the CIA ties. And it's one of the things they learn. When you put everybody under house arrest and you impose this kind of Stockholm syndrome that makes people grateful to their captors and believing that the only way to survival is through absolute obedience and compliance. Those fear levels keep people in this state of mass psychosis or hypnosis. And what we need to do, James, and I know this is what you've been trying to do for years in your work and me as well is just to wake people up, because, as you know, liberals in our country do not believe in censorship and they do not believe in mandatory medical products and giving things to children that are not proven to be good for them. And all of these, they don't. James: Blindly trust Big Pharma, right. Or the intelligence agencies, right. RFK: It goes against all of their values and all of their expressed aspirations of the party. And it's a war on the poor, let's face it. Many, many more people have died. And we made this deal in early 1999, globalism telling the developing world, if you hook into our economies, you start producing commodities rather than subsistence farming and we're going to lift you all out of poverty. One year we shut down a whole global economy and we tricked them into joining it. And now they can't sell any of their products. There's 100 million children around the globe that are put into starvation or a food insecurity that is going to disable them for a lifetime with

malnutrition or likely to lose everything else. That functionality is a far worse tragedy, are more deaths and from the lockdown than from COVID, and they're definitely young people as opposed to older people. And where I live, the death rate from COVID in my community, which is Brentwood, is one third the death rate in Compton. So all these liberals who think they're doing the right thing by putting on masks and staying in their house, they're killing people in the poor neighborhoods who are being just destroyed by this lockdown and they're not making those connections. And what I think we need to do is to wake people back up. And once they wake up and they'll do the work for us of restoring democracy, but we need to wake them up and the other side knows the peril for them and that's why they're going out of their way to silence us, because they cannot afford to have those people woken up. It won't just be disgrace and firing for Fauci, it would be Nuremberg trials and playing rock. James: Yes. The charges that you not only bring but document and really prosecute in this book are extremely serious. And if we take them seriously, yes, there are some serious consequences to what's coming here. So having said that, I fully agree and I'm on board with that agenda. Having said that, I opened today's conversation with a sarcastic reference to the disinformation dozen, which you've been enshrined in. Because obviously my audience, my regular audience will see that for the nonsense that it is. However, even within our movement question mark of people who supposedly would be on our side, I guarantee you there will be people, even in my own audience in, in the comment section screaming that Robert F Kennedy Jr is a controlled opposition and James is a shill for having interviewed him, not really recognizing that we are in, I think, the most profound peril towards human liberty that we have seen in our lifetime, facing the construction of a biosecurity state that is going to undermine all of the tenets of Western jurisprudence that we have taken for granted all our lives. We are in the fight for our life, and people are busy fighting each other, more so than fighting the real enemies here. And I want to direct people to a speech that you gave at the Ron Paul Institute in Washington recently, Pandemic and the Road to Totalitarianism* where you I think reach out and make that call for unity. Can you share some of your thoughts on that? RFK: I would go even further than you, just because I think this is a historical jeopardy to humanity that we've never seen before. The Black Plague and World War II are arguably rivals for it. But I would argue that is the worst thing that's ever happened to humanity, because the essential ambition of the totalitarian state is to control, not just conduct, self-

expression and thought. And for the first time in history, because of the technological revolution, the capacity for totalitarian forces to literally control every aspect of human expression and even human thought is now unprecedented. You know that Bill Gates brags that he's going to be able to watch what he has, 60,000 satellites, every square inch of the earth, 24 hours a day. At least in other parts of the history, you can run and you can hide and you could collect forces and begin an opposition and we can't do that anymore. And the Chinese have already deployed this vast array of facial recognition that claims to be capable of reading guilt on people, of looking at facial expressions from a distance and deciding whether somebody is guilty. So it's literally pre-crime. It's like Minority Report. And that's where we are today. In Hitler's time, you can run for a border. You could, there were ways that a certain number of people were going to escape and they're going to regroup. And there was opposition from other countries. And today we have this situation where the U.S. military and the CIA are conspiring with the Chinese CIA if not the Chinese CDC and military scientists developing bioweapons together and lying, conspiring to lie to the public of U.S. federal officials who, we know, we have communications between Fauci and the Chinese instructing him what to do and what to say in order to hide the origins of this virus. So we have U.S. federal officials who are conspiring with Chinese military officials to hide truth from the American public. And you look at Australia and Canada, these irrepressible democracies are now totalitarian regimes where they're literally building concentration camps. So I would say this is Armageddon, is the apocalyptic forces of ignorance and greed and totalitarianism. And this is the final battle. We need to win this one. James: I agree with you. This is the fight for the future of the human species, because we are at that level where totalitarianism on a scale never before imaginable is now not only imaginable, but is being implemented. And if we spend our time fighting with each other, then we then we lose and we can't afford to lose this. So I really hope that people will understand the gravity of the situation. And I think you lay out a good chunk of that in this book. It's ostensibly about Anthony Fauci. But as I say, that is just the hub from which you can explore many different spokes. Finally, before I let you go, I would be remiss in my duties if I did not ask you about something that's in the news at the moment. I'll note a couple of years ago, myself and James Pilato of MeteorMoney.com were covering on New World next week an Instagram post that you made in which you were talking about the compelling evidence that Sirhan Sirhan was not the murderer of your father, but it was Thane Eugene Caesar. And I will link to that edition of Neural next week if people are interested. But obviously right now, as we are recording this conversation, I believe Sirhan Sirhan is still waiting to hear

whether or not he is going to be granted parole. What are your thoughts on that? RFK: Sirhan Sirhan obviously took some shots at my father, but it's also very clear that he did not fire the shots that killed my father. And anybody even looks at the art. And Thomas Noguchi, who's a classic coroner, iconic author who did not believe that Sirhan could have killed my father. There were 77 eyewitnesses in the kitchen. Sirhan was six feet in front of my father at all times. He fired two shots at my father. For both of them we know what happened. One of them hit the UAW leader in the head who's still alive and fighting for Sirhan because he knows that Sirhan did not kill my father, my father's closest friend. The other one hit a doorjamb behind my father and was later recovered by the police and then destroyed. Sirhan was then grabbed by Rosey Greer, Rafer Johnson and four other men and created a dogpile. They put his arm behind him and they could not get the gun out of his hand like a superhuman strength. And he fired six other bullets and emptied the chamber. All those bullets hit people, so all the shots are accounted for. My father was shot by four bullets from behind. One went through his shoulder pad. One went into his neck, his spinal cord. One was fired directly behind his ear, into his head, and one into his back. The ones that went through his body were fired at an upward trajectory and went into the ceiling, the one lodged in his brain. And we have that and we know it does not match his guns. Thomas Noguchi's autopsy found that which was is called in the medical literature, the perfect autopsy, because he did not want to happen to my dad what had happened in Dallas where everybody had questions. He flew in the best coroners from all over the country to sit in the theater, including the chief coroner from all the armed services, each one of the services, the Marines, the Army, Navy, Air Force to sit in the theater and watch him. And what he found was that all four of those shots were contact shots. In other words, the barrel of the gun was touching my father's skin or clothing. They each left carbon tattoos and his skin, and that whoever fired those shots was standing directly behind my father holding the gun against him. And the man who was in that position was huge, intense. Taser was the security guard who had my father's elbow and who directed them toward the table where Sirhan was. Sirhan was clearly a distractor and everybody was looking at Sirhan. And while these shots were fired, as my father must have known that Caesar was shooting him because he turned and pulled off Caesar’s clip on tie and he turned slightly, always facing Sirhan. As he fell and fell, he had Caesar’s tie in his hand. He fell on Caesar and when Caesar got up. He was seen by a dozen witnesses with his gun out. He later claimed that he had pulled the

gun out to fire at Sirhan, but he's changed that story again and again and again and he disposed of the gun and lied about it. And Lisa Pease when she did her book [A Lie Too Big to Fail] on my dad this year, which is a wonderful book. It made some controversial allegations, but I think her research is really impeccable. And she was able to find employment applications of Caesar in which he admits that he worked for the CIA. His ostensible job was at the Lockheed plant in Los Angeles. He had gotten the security job a couple of days earlier. And he had been the one who directed my dad toward Sirhan. Oh, and as you know, the police collected all the photographs that were taken in that room that night, 2800 photographs, and destroyed them before the trial, before Sirhan's trial. They switched bullets to make it appear that the bullet that killed my father was from a fake thatwas fired from a gun in their repository and the LAPD police that were specifically assigned to investigate his death were all CIA people who had been pulled out of service in Latin America and brought up to serve on this special unit. And it was called Special Unit Senator and they did a cover up. James: They certainly did. At the very least, there is no doubt that there was a cover up involved. And I will you raise Lisa Peace's new book, which I know about. I haven't read, so I will read that and hopefully get her on to talk about the case in more detail. But I wanted to bring people up to date on that. Obviously, again, as we sit here recording this conversation, Sirhan Sirhan is potentially going to be released on parole, so obviously in the news at the moment. Other than that, most importantly for today's conversation, how do people get a copy of this new book, The Real Anthony Fauci? And please don't say Jeff Bezos and Amazon. RFK: I will not. The best place you can get it from our point of view, is from your local bookstore. You can do that by walking in or you can go online. Most of them have online presences, but the reason that's important is because The New York Times does not pay attention to, we need to get on The New York Times list, which we should, because we sold a huge and unprecedented number in the first week. So we should if The New York Times is on, as they put it, as a number one bestseller. But they do their list in a strange way, which is they base it on sales, not on Amazon, but on independent bookstores. So if you can buy the book from an independent bookstore, it is going to help us a lot. And we actually have a list on our website on Children's Health Defense website of the stores that are the best ones to purchase it from. And it's like the Harvard coop and that wonderful Powells Bookstore in Portland, I've been there many times, but the sort of well-known independent bookstores around the country, that's the best place

you can buy it. But if you want to know what you can do for the resistance right now, buy a copy of the book. I make no money on the book. I donate all my profits to the Children's Health Defense. But we need people to read the book. We need the media which shuts us out on everything else to have to acknowledge that this is a bestseller and that people are reading it and that there is an alternate story narrative out there that people are interested in and force the mainstream media to confront that fact. And the best way to do that if you have family members who don't agree with you like me, if friends don't agree with you, one of the things that you can do is to send them this book for Christmas. And next time they disagree with you, just say, have you read that book? So it's something everybody can do. And I know we have a lot of overlapping friends, and you've been out there longer than anybody and you've educated a lot of the world James and I have a really deep, deep gratitude for you, for everything you've done, that deep, deep level of research. But more important than anything else, your reliability as a researcher, I really have tremendous respect for your precision and your discipline about making sure that what you write about is as close to truth as we can that is that available. And I think all of us at our best are engaged and search for existential truths and people right now have their minds clouded by fear, by propaganda. And you are really you're a beacon of clarity in a world that is filled with confusion and lies right now. Oh, thank you. James: Well, I very much appreciate those words. I am just a flawed human being doing my best, but I do my best to be accurate when I can be. So I do very much appreciate that acknowledgment. And I will, of course, direct people once again to Children's Health Defense, where obviously not just your work, but the work of teams of researchers and writers are doing diligent efforts that we often highlight on New World next week. So I will direct people there and to the book itself. I think we'll leave today's conversation there, but hopefully we can have you back on in the future to continue talking about this. The most important event of our lifetime. Robert F Kennedy, Jr. Thank you for joining us today. RFK: Thank you very much, James.

Title Page Copyright Page Dedication & Acknowledgments Publisher’s Note Introduction Chapter 1: Mismanaging a Pandemic I: Arbitrary Decrees: Science-Free Medicine II: Killing Hydroxychloroquine III: Ivermectin IV: Remdesivir V: Final Solution: Vaccines or Bust Chapter 2: Pharma Profits over Public Health Chapter 3: The HIV Pandemic Template for Pharma Profiteering Chapter 4: The Pandemic Template: AIDS and AZT Chapter 5: The HIV Heresies Chapter 6: Burning The HIV Heretics Chapter 7: Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde: NIAID’s Barbaric and Illegal Experiments on Children Chapter 8: White Mischief: Dr. Fauci’s African Atrocities Chapter 9: The White Man’s Burden Chapter 10: More Harm Than Good Chapter 11: Hyping Phony Epidemics: “Crying Wolf” Chapter 12: Germ Games Afterword Author’s Note

A full text copy of the book can be found online here A copy of the Rand Paul Institute talk is in the Appendix.

*Here is the footnote talk James referred to

Pandemic and the Road to Totalitarianism Ron Paul Institute public talk by RFK Jr https://archive.org/details/robert-f-kennedy-jr-at-ron-paul-instituteconference-on-pandemic-and-the-road-to Moderator: I'm not going to make a long introduction to this next individual. We all know him as a true modern day hero going against the tide, not afraid, fearless and we are so grateful that he's agreed to join us. Robert F Kennedy Jr. RFK Jr.: Thank you, everybody. I want to thank all of you stalwarts for coming here. And I want to thank particularly Ron Paul for hosting you, for keeping the flame for his lifelong commitment to civil rights, to its Constitution. And there are many, many areas of differences in our political opinions over the past 40 years that both of us have been in politics. Both of

us share that reverence for the Bill of Rights. I think ultimately it's that retreat fortress where all of us are holding up. I want to talk about the thing that we have in common, which isn't the Constitution. I gave a speech in, I think last August was the beginning of the pandemic. I talked about Hermann Göring's observation at Nuremberg where he was on trial and he was eventually executed. He said at the time, he didn't say it in the Nuremberg transcripts. He said in a private conversation with a psychologist called Gilbert, who was given access to the prisoners. And that discrepancy, by the way, has been exploited by the modern propaganda juggernaut. I think these fact checking organizations, which of course, are funded by Bill Gates, by Facebook, by the medical cartel, by the State Department, saying that he never said these words at Nuremberg. But, and it's true, he didn't say them in the transcript of Nuremberg. They were recorded by Gustave Gilbert [in his book called Nuremberg Diary]. And what he said is--Gilbert said to him “how did you do this to the German people?” And he [Göring] started explaining all their propaganda techniques. And Gilbert interrupted him and said, “that couldn't happen in a democracy because there's free choice, there's critical thinking”. And he said, “You can do this in any system. It doesn't matter whether it's democracy or monarchy or communist system or a fascist system. All you need to do is invoke fear. You tell the people that they are under attack that you're the only one who can save them. Anybody who disagrees with you is a threat to the Commonwealth. And they will do anything that you tell them to do.” Hitler was democratically elected by the most well-educated people on the planet, the highest level of education and some of the most tolerant people in Europe at that time. The reason there were so many Jews in Germany is because Germany was very bad at the Jews long before Hitler, much less bad than the Eastern European countries like Spain or the other countries from which they fled to come to Germany. And so you had a people that historically were tolerant, open minded, questioning and critical, and probably the public was the strongest democracy in Europe. And Hitler was elected. He did not take over. He was elected by people. He had 3% of the vote in the previous election. And then he won the majority and because he was able to manipulate the use of fear. And we've seen one of the alarming parts of this pandemic for those of us who are little conversant with the kind of medical paradigms that are being invoked right now, to understand with such clarity the manipulations that are taking place, the chicanery, the hiding of real data obscuring of all of these of true facts and figures that we could use to make rational policy decisions. How do case fatality rates relate to the seasonal flu for each age group, who is dying,

at what age, who is not, who is what are the real death counts from COVID? CDC has admitted that of 96% of the people, only 4% of the people who are characterized, who it classifies as having died from COVID, died from only COVID at the average number of potentially fatal co-morbidities. The remaining 96% is 3.8. The people who died, 96% of them died for other reasons that might have killed them. And the manipulation of the death certificates, the manipulation of the PCR test, all of these manipulations that are all designed, the AIDS funded projection from the London and from NIH and Washington, which they use to manipulate the lockdowns, which we now see were 40 times the death rate that actually was imposed by COVID. So all of these mechanisms appear to have been deliberately manipulated to put our population in a state of fear. And what happens when you have a population in fear? You have the complete obliteration of critical thinking. And then people stop asking questions. And it is a biological impulse. We retreat to the hardwired impulses, hardwired into us during the 20,000 generations that the human race was wandering, the African savanna and small tribes, tribal groups at war, embattled, besieged all the time. And the only way to survival was to follow a strong male leader, to embrace a common orthodoxy that would provide unit cohesion, and then to practice blind obedience to the leader. And that's where we all go in times of fear, unless we have something else that says to us, “I'm going to question this. I'm going to start questioning these things.” And when you start doing that with your orthodoxy, the official orthodoxy is the whole thing falls apart. But we've all seen this kind of bewildering imposition of totalitarian controls in our society, which we've never seen, and attacks on the United States Constitution that are unprecedented in American history. Remember during the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln tried to end in habeas corpus, just one provision of the United States Constitution. The court said, you can't do that. There is no emergency exemption in the United States Constitution and there's certainly no pandemic exemption. And it's not that our framers did not know about pandemics. It was a pandemic during the Revolutionary War of smallpox that brought the armies of New England to a standstill for three months, and they all knew about it. And it was another pandemic during the American Revolution of Malaria and Washington. ironically used the Janjaweed tree, which is the modern analogue of hydroxychloroquine to end that pandemic. And so they knew about what pandemics were, but they didn't put the United States Constitution and all of these rights will be suspended as soon as we have a pandemic. James Madison said the reason we put the right to free speech in the First Amendment is because all of the other civil rights and human rights and

constitution rights are based upon it. If a government can hide what it's doing by censoring its opponents and silencing dissidents, it has license to do anything that it wants. So they conspired with the social media and the media. We now have the emails that show Fauci corresponding with Zuckerberg, telling him what to shut down and what not to shut down. And they shut down the critics. And once they did that, once they imposed censorship and they closed debate off on the public square, they were able to go after all the other amendments. So they went after religious freedoms. They closed the churches in this country, every church in this country for a year and they kept the liquor stores open as essential businesses. There's no there's no protection of liquor stores in the United States Constitution. There is protection of churches. And they abolished religious exemptions. They got rid of jury trials. One of the first things that they did, the Seventh Amendment right to jury trial, seventh Amendment says under no conditions will Americans be denied their right to a trial by their peers in matters exceeding $25 in value. And yet anybody who claims, any corporation that claims to be implementing a countermeasure is now immune from lawsuits. No matter if a vaccine maker, Remdesivir maker, no matter how negligent that company is, no matter how reckless their conduct, no matter how grievous your injury or death, you cannot sue them. And that, again, is novel in American history. All these companies now and I saw it yesterday in the Theranos lawsuit that the judge has banned unvaccinated jurors. And that ultimately, we all know, is a political implication. You're getting rid of all the black jurors. 70% of blacks are unvaccinated and you're getting rid of any juror who knows how to do critical thinking. Rights of association and rights of assembly, telling us we had to social distance from each other. We can't gather in crowds. Imagine this. They got rid of property rights. It closed every business, a million businesses in this country without due process and without just compensation in direct violation of the Constitution, of due process, notice and comment rule making. We know how you pass rules in this country. In a democracy, Congress can pass rules. It can vote, it can deliberate as they see fit. A regulatory agency cannot do that and an executive cannot do that because the courts and we all were frightened to death. We're creating these unelected officials. We have to have some democratic control. I've been suing people for 40 years, governments, the EPA, the Interior Department and all the state EPA's are doing kind of regulatory favors for industry without going through the regulated process. Here's what you have to do when you pass a regulation. You have to propose a rule. You have to publish a proposed rule. Here's what we're going to do. We're going to get

everybody to wear masks. You have to publish an environmental impacts and a regulatory impact statement, an economic impact statement saying, here's the science that we use to support that rule. Here's the justification for it. Here's the people who will be hurt and the financial cost of those people and other costs. Here are the groups. Here are the advantages and the benefits of that rule. They all have to be quantified and they have to give the public a chance to comment, notice and comment. The public then writes and it says, “Wait a minute, I run a wilderness kayaking group you're going to put out of business and destroy. And there's no reason to mask. There's no science says that masks in these outside settings are going to help. Why don't you examine my business?” Every business has a right to write in and say, or we can do this, we can do that, we can mitigate the risks. So let's change the rule to accommodate that so it's as narrowly tailored as possible as the law requires. None of that happened. And you have a public hearing where Tony Fauci brings in all of his science. That's the same as work, none, and all of his scientists that he relied on. And he is not going to be able to find one because we will destroy them in depositions and embarrass and humiliate them. And we get to crossexamine them. And I cross examined hours and then the administrative law judge rewrites the rules according to so that they aren't arbitrary and capricious and then recommends them. And if they don't reflect the evidence, we can sue the agency. So there's all these democratic protections. All of that was waived. All of these things were imposed upon us by fiat, with no discussion, no science cited. And also all this track and trace surveillance is violating our right to not have warrantless searches and seizures. You go through the entire Bill of Rights and with one exception, that the Second Amendment, they have all been obliterated. And the weird thing to me is I grew up in a liberal milieu where everybody I knew was saying, one thing we got to do is protect the Constitution and have my side, even ones who are advocating censorship and these kind of controls and the erosion and subversion of our traditional Bill of Rights is really, it is surreal. And we all read Kafka when we were growing up. We all read Orwell, we read all these Robert Heinlein, all of these stories, these parables about the imposition of totalitarianism. All of us knew what right was from wrong. And it's hard to see how people have forgotten those things. One of the things, and I'm writing this book now, about to publish this book on Anthony Fauci and part of my journey in writing that book, it's taken me over a year of really intense research, was it took me kind of an eye journey to try to explain how this could have happened in America. And one of the things that I discovered during this process is what's happening now, this

lockstep imposition of totalitarian controls, not just in America, but in every one of the liberal democracies in the world and all of the other countries in the world. China moved into Hong Kong and banned the last Democratic newspaper. And everywhere in the world we see these we see liberal democracy and constitutional rights disappearing. And it all happened at once as if it was planned. And I don't consider myself a conspiracy theorist. And it's tough to imagine how anybody could have planned this. But then I stumbled on these simulations, and many of you saw this simulation that took place Event 201 in October of 2019. So we now know that the virus was began circulating around September 14th. And so this took place after the virus was already circulating in Wuhan. And the people who took part in that simulation were the deputy director of the CIA, Avril Haines, who's now the number one person in control of the National Security Agency under Biden. Bill Gates, of course, who financed it, people from the social media groups, people from the biggest pharmaceutical companies, Johnson & Johnson, people from global PR, corporate PR agencies and health officials from all over the world, including the Chinese. And what were they simulating? They weren't simulating a pandemic. They weren't simulating a medical response to that pandemic. They were simulating a militarized response. How do you use that pandemic to particularly in that Event 201 to impose censorship globally? And that's what they were modeling. And if you go look particularly at episode four, it's all about, and oddly, their preoccupation was, how do we stop people from talking about the fact that this virus may have been lab generated and released? So they're talking about that in October 2019. And I'm not making this up. You can go to the simulation and see this. How do we shut these people up? George Gayle, the head of the Chinese CDC, is saying we need to stop people from talking about that issue. But as I looked at that issue, I found that there was another one called SARS where they did the same thing. They're not talking about how do you quarantine the sick and care for them. Instead, they're how do you lock down the healthy? Something never been done in history. How do you force people to wear masks? How do you force people to comply with social isolation? How do you bring in the military? How do you silence all dissent? And we're talking about how do you get people to take vitamin D and how do you build their immune systems and tell them don't lose weight to exercise? 80% of the people who die were overweight. And it was probably a lot more than that because they were counting people who died from lightning strikes and car crashes. And how do you develop therapeutic drugs off the shelf? Therapeutic drugs! The most obvious thing to do to is to create a communications system

between among the world's 11 million doctors, people that are frontline treating the disease so that every successful treatment protocol is called in and other people are given the opportunity to repeat it and then ways to assess which ones are working, which ones aren't and really rapid. Let's keep controlled trials in hospitals all over the world and to create field clinics where you're treating people who are not sick but are infected, so they never have to go to the hospital and develop protocols so they never have to leave their homes. So you want to avoid hospitalizations, one, because that's the reason they gave for shutting down society, two. If you can treat somebody before they leave their home. Every time somebody leaves their home who's sick and going to the hospital really sick, that is a superspreader event. That person is spreading the disease to Uber drivers, to doctors and nurses, to family members, to people on the street. You want to treat them at home. To give them the things that we know kill, viral replication, zinc and anything that enhances zinc, like hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin and 100 other remedies that we now know dramatically reduce the spread of this disease. And what was our [Event 201] protocol? Our protocol is to do none of that, no treatment until you go to the hospital. Then your treatment are two things that are bound to kill you, ventilators and Remdesivir. And Tony Fauci knew that Remdesivir would kill you. He knew that because in 2019, he tried to use it for Ebola. In 2019 he tried it and within five days of treatment, it gave lethal side effect to 54% of the people and the Safety Monitoring Board ordered him to terminate the use of that drug. And he threw a phony, contrived, absolutely fraudulent story that he manipulated and orchestrated that drug be made a standard of care. It is homicide. And if you look, how does it kill people? Three ways, kidney failure, heart failure and all organs collapse. And what happened to the people who died in the pandemic? What were they dying of? Kidney failure? All the doctors said, you heard it again and again. We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys, because it wasn't the virus. It was the Remdesivir. And he denied them deliberately, purposely access to the things that we know work, because 248 studies show they do, which is Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and all the others, even monoclonal antibodies which they know work. They denied all the people that were in the nursing home where they could have given it to them. So something about this smelled. It was it was suspicious and weird from the beginning. But what I found during the course of my research is that those simulations were not just confined to Event 201 and SARS. I found over a dozen of them where they did them at least once every two years from beginning in 2000. Most of them were top secret. But they involved hundreds of thousands of

people. They were doing these simulations with all the police forces, many of the big city police forces in our country, with frontline doctors and nurses, with medical officials, with big corporate officials from the energy industry, from the medical cartels, from the pharmaceutical industry. And they were involving not just the United States, Canada, Mexico and all the nations of Europe were all participating secretly and drilling this again and again and again. And if you look at the techniques that they were using. Here's some things they had in common. Virtually every one of those simulations involved representatives from the CIA. And the scripts for them were written by people associated with the intelligence agencies. Almost all of them had a well-known American or European leader. Heads of Denmark, Sweden, Sam Nunn, Madeleine Albright, Gary Hart would be at the head of them. And that gave them kind of an imprimatur of gravitas and legitimacy. So all of these frontline workers who are being asked to do weird things, not your patients, but sensing people, they all now have in their head, this is what you do with a pandemic. This is a legitimate way to respond to the pandemic, the only way to respond. It's not to make people better. It's not to treat their illnesses. It's not to keep them alive. It's to clamp down. It's totalitarian controls. I wrote a book about my family's 60 year battle with the CIA. It's called American Values. And in researching that, I went out and purchased at great cost, some of them cost me thousands of dollars, the CIA manuals for manipulating large populations. And they wrote a series of manuals for the techniques that are useful when the intelligence agencies want to go into another foreign policy arena, go into an indigenous society to destroy local businesses, to isolate, destroy institutional structures, destroy social structures and social relationships, to obliterate the economy, to create chaos, to then create enough people in that country who will allow a foreign entity to come in and clamp down centralized control. And almost all of the techniques that are outlined in those manuals are the same techniques that they were practicing it simulations, simulations year after year after year with hundreds of thousands of people. And, for example, in the CIA manual the CIA conducted these well-known programs were called by various names. Operation Artichoke, MK-ULTRA, etc., in the late fifties, sixties and seventies, and we developed ways of manipulating human beings on an individual basis and on a mass basis. And the most potent technique, incidentally, that they learned again and again and more potent than physical torture was isolation. If you can isolate people and they did this the sensory deprivation tanks, but also just locking people in solitary confinement. You can get them to do almost anything you

want after a certain period of time, it will drive them mad because social animals, we’re social beings. And when you tear that social fabric, it makes people desperate, fearful and obedient to do anything. Another technique is called Stockholm Syndrome, which is a way of putting individuals or large parts of humanity on lockdown for long periods of time. And it induces a kind of mass psychosis that makes them grateful to their captors, makes them empathize with their captors, renders them obedient, believing that obedience is the only path to salvation, absolute obedience, and it obliterates critical thinking. During this period, the CIA was funding these kinds of studies at many, 149, universities, including McGill University in Canada, Universities at Berkeley, Harvard, Columbia, many, many others all around our country, and even some universities in Central America, Guatemala, etc.. And they were using prison populations, they were using military people, they were using the subjects from mental institutions, people who were expendable, whose disappearance would not be noticed. We don't know exactly which of these projects were funded by the CIA because that was never released in the family jewels disclosures in the 1970s when these investigations were done and all the material was subsequently destroyed, or most of it. But there were these mind control experiments that all the colleges and one of the ones that almost certainly was funded by the CIA, scholars believe, is an experiment called the Milgram experiment. Many of you have heard of Milgram experiment, and you can look this up. As a young psychologist or social scientist called Stanley Milgram, and he recruited subjects from every walk of life blacks, whites, the cross-section of America, factory workers, construction workers, university professors, students, etc., housewives. And he would put them the subject in a room and set them at a table where they would twist a dial and the dial would supposedly administer electric shocks to a person sitting in the next room who they could not see. They could hear the screams and the pleading and the crying, the agony that they were causing and the begging. And they had a guy who was dressed as a doctor in a white lab coat who was telling them, turn it up higher at different intervals. And many of the people who were turning it up were crying because they didn't want to do it, because it clashed with their essential values. It clashed with their conscience. They had to override their conscience. And the doctor would order them to do it. We'll tell you this, at 67% of the people of the Americans who are liberal or conservative, etc., who were told to do that, turned that dial up to 450 volts where it said on the dial, “potentially fatal”. So they were willing to kill somebody if a doctor told them to do it.

And that's a really important lesson for today, because what did they have? They don't have science. They don't have any success. Tony Fauci gave us one of the worst, the worst record arguably in the world, preserving life. We have 5% of the population in the world and 25% of the deaths in the richest country in the world. How is that possible? We have 1600 per million die in our country. There's African countries where they take hydroxychloroquine once a week where they had one in a million die. That’s a thousand times greater than these poor countries that, at first, they were telling us were going to bear the brunt. Here are the people who are going to need the most help and they don't want our help because they're doing it right. And so we have a doctor with a worse track record, a doctor who came in in 1968 when 6% of the American public had chronic disease, which he's supposed to prevent allergic and immune diseases, autoimmune diseases which he's supposed to prevent, and today under his watch 54% of our children have those diseases. He has failed upward his entire career. [loud applause] And so he's telling us here's what you've got to do. He has a schoolboy's allergy to citation. He never tells us. Here's the science that says this. He just says, this is what the science says. And one day, the science says masks don't work and two months later it says, strap on two of them. There's no science cited. Lockdowns work, no science. And so all of my colleagues in the Democratic Party are saying what? We've got to trust the experts. But that trusting the experts is a function of religion, not science. Science is about skepticism. It's about questioning. It's about cynicism. It's about not believing anything you're told. It's about showing me the evidence. I was on the trial team that tried the Monsanto case. And in the Monsanto case, Monsanto came in with the greatest experts in America, people from the Harvard School of Public Health, etc.. My wife, who is not an attorney, came and sat in on the trial one day when Monsanto had its experts. At the end of the day, she said,”why are you even doing this, this poor company? Why are you abusing them to me?” And I said to her, “Wait till tomorrow when we cross-examine them.” At the end of that day, she said, “What a bunch of liars.” So every case, I've been involved in 500 lawsuits, and every one of them involves the defendants. The corporations come in with their experts and we come in with ours. And in this case, we had Harvard experts, too. And in the end, the jury believed our experts and they gave us $2.2 billion. So this idea that you trust the experts, it's an oxymoron. There's no such thing. Every major medical theory, whether it's heliocentrism or evolution, it started out as a minority position that was ridiculed and gaslighted and laughed at and marginalized, and then it was accepted as fact. And so we

need to respect each other's opinions. We need to respect critical thinking, and we need to be nurturing that, not silencing it. And yet we have these political lists. And when you go to your doctor and he tells you you've got a big problem and I need to do surgery on you, what do you do? You say, I want a second opinion. And we should be doing the same thing with Tony Fauci. By the way, there are many medical experts out there who are saying the opposite to him. There’s Peter McCulloch and Peter Berg and Dr. Harvey Risch from Yale. And I can go on, Ryan Cole, all of these people who actually treat COVID patients and save their lives and are achieving results with those patients that Tony Fauci never dreamed of that we could have. And they are all saying 80% of Americans who died did not need to die if you had done these commonsense, proven protocols and that's what they're saying. And what is the response? It's not debate. It's not let me see your evidence. It's these people are dangerous. They need to be silenced. And that's not America. What all of us need to understand is that our country is under attack right now. We have lost, as you know. What is our country? Is it just a place where you can come and accumulate a big pile for yourself and whoever dies with the most stuff wins? Or is it the landscape? Is it the Purple Mountains Majesty? Is it the population, the diversity, etc.? It's all those things. But more than anything else, it's our Constitution. It's the statement of shared values. It holds us all together as a people. And we're saying to the rest of the world, we believe something in our country more strongly than anybody else believes, which is that we have to love our liberties more than we fear a disease. [loud applause] What I tell my children who have sometimes questioned me. I've said to them because they hear CNN all the time and they read The New York Times. And they say, well, this is going to kill people. And I say there's a lot worse things than dying. And that may seem cold, but there was a generation of Americans in 1776 who said, you know what, it's worth dying to give my children and their children and their children a bundle of rights that will guarantee them liberty forever. And so they laid down their properties, their livelihoods, their lives to provide us with that constitution, which we have given away for free to a lying doctor in one year after 200 years of preserving it. And we need to understand that these are things that we need to be fighting for right now. I've told people for many, many years. People have come to me, famous actors and athletes, and said I don't want to challenge the vaccinated protocol because it's going to destroy my career and doctors. And I've always said to them, well, there is ways to work around it, to be part of the battle without sacrificing your livelihoods. The time has come now where

we all have to stand up and we all have to be committing civil disobedience every single day peacefully. And that means when you see somebody with a baby walking by, you tell them, don't give a COVID vaccine to that baby because baby has no chance of dying of COVID and they have a big chance of getting injured from vaccine. And we provide cards that talk about the facts and you can get those. You can hang them out, you can put them in restrooms, you can put them on bulletin boards. You can tell your doctor to his face. Show me the evidence. You can be confrontational with people. You can be gentle. You can say what you mean without saying it mean. But you need to start talking back and you need to start talking up. And the more people that do that, you know what? There's a lot of converts coming over to our side. There's no converts going over to their side. And the way that they have robbed people of critical thinking is by repeating the same message over and over and over again. And there is peer reviewed evidence that shows that works, advertising works. That's why it's a $100 billion industry. If you repeat a message, no matter how ridiculous it is again and again, people tend to believe. The way that you shatter that paradigm and that orthodoxy by repeating the opposite message, the truth, and letting somebody hear that when they're out on their morning walk and they're walking their baby in the stroller through the grocery store. When they're in the doctor's office listening to the doctor fire you while you talk back to him and making trouble everywhere you go and standing up, because people are going to hear you and then they may not convert at that point. They hear that two or three times. And they're going to say, maybe I ought to look into this. You know what happens when you start looking into this? It's down the rabbit hole and you're like, Holy crap, I can't believe what they did to us. So anyway, I want to thank all of you. We are fighting now. This is the American Revolution all over again. It started out with a small group of people. And it wasn't just a revolution where people gave their lives for this country. And the Civil War is 669,000 people died to preserve our nation and they gave up their lives with great bravery. And we need to now be willing to give up something, to make sacrifices and to win this battle against these elites and these globalists who are trying to take away everything that is meaningful to us, our freedoms, our pride in our country. And I can say to you, I'm very proud to be in this room with all of you. You know what the Milgram experiment showed at 67% of the people in this country, your neighbors, good Americans will allow their conscience to be overridden, will trample their own values if they're told to do so by a voice of authority, and particularly by a doctor and a medical coat and the people, the 33% that didn't are the people sitting in this room. And you need

to be proud of the fact that you are not in that group that electrocuted somebody. My father told me when I was a little kid, he read The Diary of Anne Frank to me and my siblings. And he said people kept saying at that point in history, a lot of people were talking about the Nazis and what how the German people, this could this have happened to them. And my father said this is not anything to do with Germans. We all have this disease. They can do this to any of us. And he said, “You kids need to ask yourself if this ever happened in the United States, would you be the people who hid Anne Frank or would you be the people who turned her in?” And you guys have all answered that question. You're the ones who would have hidden Ann Frank. And you need to be proud of that. You kept your values, your critical thinking when they were under terrible, ferocious assault. And what I will pledge to you is that I am proud to stand shoulder to shoulder with all of you and with my friend Ron Paul and fight this battle, the second American Revolution. And I can tell you right now, I do not know whether we're going to win or lose. And I can tell you the only thing I can control is a little piece of real estate inside my own shoes. And I can tell you that whatever happens, I will go down fighting and that I will die with my boots on. Thank you. [wild applause] Also did a book tour stop here.