The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law 9780198848639, 0198848633

This Handbook draws together leading and emerging scholars to provide a comprehensive critical analysis of international

895 37 10MB

English Pages 1337 Year 2021

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

Table of contents :
Cover
The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law
Copyright
Foreword
Acknowledgements
Contents
List of Abbreviations
Treaties and Other Instruments
Abbreviations
Table of Cases
International Bodies
International Court of Justice
International Criminal Court
International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
Permanent Court of Arbitration
United Nations Committee against Torture
United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child
United Nations Human Rights Committee
United Nations War Crimes Commission
Regional Bodies
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child
African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Court of Justice of the European Union
European Committee of Social Rights
European Court of Human Rights
Inter-AmericanCourt and Commission of Human Rights
National Decisions
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Ecuador
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
India
Ireland
Italy
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea
Kyrgyzstan
Malaysia
Mexico
Nauru
The Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States of America
Venezuela
Table of Instruments
International and Regional Instruments
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
Executive Committee (ExCom)
National Legislation
Albania
Angola
Argentina
Australia
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brazil
Brunei
Burundi
Cambodia
Canada
Central African Republic
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Ecuador
Egypt
Ethiopia
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Japan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Korea
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Macau
Macedonia
Malaysia
Mexico
Montenegro
Myanmar
Nairob
The Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragu
Norway
Pakistan
Papua New Guinea
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Serbi
Sierra Leone
South Africa
South Korea
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Uganda
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Vanuatu
Vietnam
Contributors
Introducing International Refugee Law as a Scholarly Field
1. Introduction
2. History and Praxis of International Refugee Law Scholarship
a. The Emergence of the Scholarly Field
b. International Refugee Law as a Field of Praxis
c. Methodology: Doctrine and Beyond
3. Structure and Content
Part I: International Refugee Law—Reflections on the Scholarly Field
Part II: Sources
Part III: Regional Regimes
Part IV: Access to Protection and International Responsibility-sharing
Part V: The Scope of Refugee Protection
Part VI: Refugee Rights and Realities
Part VII: The End of Refugeehood—Cessation and Durable Solutions
Part VIII: Accountability for Displacement and Refugee Rights Violations
4. The Future Research Agenda: Challenges and Possibilities
Part I: International Refugee Law— Reflections On The Scholarly Field
Chapter 1: International Refugee Law In The Early Years
1. Introduction
a. The League of Nations
b. Matters of International Concern
c. Refugees
2. The League of Nations High Commissioner for Russian Refugees
a. Certificates of Identity and Passports
b. Developing Standards: 1923 and Beyond
i. The Principle of No Compulsory Return
ii. ‘Defining’ Refugees
iii. ‘Protecting’ Refugees
3. The 1933 Convention Relating to the International Status of Refugees
a. Developments after 1933
i. The Institut de Droit International
ii. Political Developments
4. The End of the Early Years
Chapter 2: Race, Refugees, And International Law
1. Introduction
2. Race and Refugees: The Conceptual Terrain
a. Race as Structure
b. Racism, Xenophobia, and Xenophobic Discrimination
3. The Doctrine and Its Enforcement
a. Race and Ethnicity in the Refugee Convention
b. Racial and Xenophobic Discrimination under ICERD
4. Regime Analysis
5. Conclusions: Charting a Research Agenda
Chapter 3: A Feminist Appraisal Of International Refugee Law
1. Introduction
a. Gender Defined
2. Normative Movement(s)
a. Refugee Arrangements Pre-1951
b. Normative Progress
c. Progress Stalled
3. Physical Movement
a. Transit
b. Refugee Reception
c. Resettlement
4. Directions for Future Normative Movement
Chapter 4: Queering International Refugee Law
1. Setting the Scene
2. Integrating SOGI into Refugee Law
3. Ensuring Protection
4. Shaping a Queer International Refugee Law
5. Addressing Specific Needs
6. Looking to the Future
Chapter 5: The Politics Of International Refugee Law And Protection
1. Introduction
2. The Politics of Refugee Construction
3. The Geopolitics of Responses to Displacement
4. The Politics of Compliance and Implementation
5. The Politics of Reputation
6. The Politics of Categorization
7. The Politics of Public Opinion and Domestic Electoral Politics
8. The Politics of Data and Statistics
9. Conclusion
Chapter 6: The Ethics Of International Refugee Protection
1. Introduction
2. Statist Ethics of Refugee Protection
a. Liberal Nationalism
b. Liberal Internationalism
3. Cosmopolitan Ethics of Refugee Protection
a. Agency-centric Views
b. Power-centric Views
c. Postcolonial Views
4. Towards an Ethical Reorientation
Chapter 7: Refugees As Migrants
1. The Problematic Refugee/ Migrant Binary
2. The Voluntary/Forced Migration Binary and the Mounting Barriers Refugees Face to Reach Safety
3. The Limits of Durable Solutions for Refugees and their Consequences
4. International Human Rights Law and the Protection of all Migrants (including Refugees)
5. Freedom of Movement as a Fundamental Right
6. Conclusion
Chapter 8: The Intersection Of International Refugee Law And International Statelessness Law
1. Introduction
2. The Interaction between Statelessness and Forced Displacement
3. International Statelessness Law
4. When a Refugee is also Stateless, or a Stateless Person is also a Refugee
5. Final Observations: The Need for Stronger Dialogue between Two (Sub-)Fields
Part II: Sources
Chapter 9: The Architecture Of The Un Refugee Convention And Protocol
1. The Refugee Convention and Protocol as Interlocking Sources of Obligation
2. Refugee Status as a Non-reservable International Norm
3. Refugee Status as Declaratory
4. Non-exclusive Catalogue of Rights
5. Exceptions and Derogation
6. Rights Acquisition by Attachment
7. Rights Defined by a Mix of Absolute and Contingent Standards
8. State-by State Implementation
Chapter 10: The Office Of The United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees
1. Introduction
2. UNHCR’s Mandate Responsibilities
3. UNHCR’s Operational Functions
4. UNHCR and the Making and Implementation of International Refugee Law
a. International Contexts
b. Regional Contexts
c. National Contexts
5. Conclusion
Chapter 11: Moving Towards an Integrated Approach of Refugee Law and Human Rights Law
1. Introduction
2. The Changing Pattern of Refugee Protection under Public International Law
a. The Original Design of Refugee Protection
b. The Evolution of Refugee Protection
3. A Human Rights-based Approach to Refugee Protection
a. The Conceptual Foundation of the Human Rights-based Approach to Refugee Protection: The Complementarity Model
b. The Normative Content of the Human Rights-based Approach to Refugee Protection: The Acid Test of the Cumulative Application o
4. Conclusion
Chapter 12: International Humanitarian Law And Refugee Protection
1. IHL and Displacement—An (Un)Easy Relationship?
2. Effects of IHL on Global and Regional Refugee Protection Regimes
a. Regime Interaction
b. The Refugee Convention
c. Regional Refugee Definitions: OAU and Cartagena
d. Subsidiary Protection in EU Law
3. The Scope of Application of IHL
a. International Armed Conflicts and Non-international Armed Conflicts
b. Who Classifies Conflicts, and does Classification Matter?
4. Displacement in IHL
a. Context
b. Adherence to IHL, the Principle of Distinction, and Prevention of Displacement
c. Individual Status in Conflict
d. Prevention of Displacement from Conflict
e. Displaced Persons in Conflict
i. ‘Refugees’
ii. Persons in Refugee-like Situations in Occupied Territory
iii. Pre-conflict Refugees
f. (Non-)Refoulement and Repatriation During and Post Conflict
i. Obligations of Parties to the Conflict
ii. Obligations of all High Contracting Parties
5. Concluding Thoughts
Chapter 13: Customary Refugee Law
1. Introduction
a. Customary International Law: A Disputed but Powerful Rule of Law
b. The Restricted Role of International Custom in Refugee Law
2. Non-refoulement
a. Non-refoulement in Article 33(1) of the Refugee Convention
b. An International Custom of Non-refoulement
c. Non-refoulement as Jus Cogens?
3. Temporary Refuge
a. ‘Non-refoulement through Time’
b. An International Custom of Temporary Refuge
4. Asylum
a. The Right to Grant Asylum as a Fettered Right of States
b. Asylum and Non-refoulement
c. The Right to Seek, Enjoy, and Receive Asylum
5. Conclusion
Chapter 14: National Constitutions And Refugee Protection
1. Introduction
2. A Complex Relationship
a. The Text and Context of a National Constitution
b. State Perspectives on International Law
i. The Nature of Legal Systems
ii. Bills of Rights
iii. Supranational Frameworks
c. Constitutional Law and International Refugee Law
i. Foundational Influence of National Constitutions
ii. The Enduring Influence of Constitutional Law
iii. Constitutional Exceptionalism
3. A Taxonomy
a. Symbiosis
b. Ambivalence
c. Antagonism
4. Applying the Taxonomy
a. Symbiosis: Kenya and the Right to Freedom of Movement
i. Constitutional Rights and Freedom of Movement
b. Ambivalence: The Venezuelan Crisis and the Right Work
i. The Venezuelan Refugee Crisis
c. Antagonism: Australia and the Rights to Liberty and Due Process
i. Manus Island: A Tale of Two Constitutions
5. Conclusion
Part III: Regional Regimes
Chapter 15: Regional Refugee Regimes: Africa
1. Introduction
2. Africa as a Region
3. The Treaty Framework
a. The History of the OAU Convention
b. The OAU Convention
c. Human Rights Law
4. The Institutional Framework
5. Contemporary Achievements and Challenges
6. Conclusion
Chapter 16: Regional Refugee Regimes: North America
1. Introduction
2. The North American Refugee Regime: Legal Framework
3. Canada
a. Birth of the Canadian Refugee System
b. Canada Forges Its Own Path: Central America and the
Decision
c. A Retreat to Protectionism
4. United States
a. 1965 Amendments and Ratification of the Protocol
b. Refugee Act of 1980 and Subsequent Legislation
c. IIRAIRA: The Immigration Enforcement Model
5. Mexico
a. The Guatemalan Refugee Migration: Mexico Ratifies the Convention and Protocol
b. Mexico’s Asylum System: Weak Processes, Lack of Resources, and Escalating Violence
6. Contemporary Challenges in the Region
a. Externalization of Borders and Containment Practices
b. Procedural Erosions
7. Conclusion
Chapter 17: Regional Refugee Regimes: Latin America
1. Introduction
2. The Asylum Regime and Sub-regimes in Latin America
3. The Legal Framework for the Protection of Political Asylees and Refugees in Latin America
a. Differences and Similarities between Political Asylees and Refugees
b. Political Asylees
c. Refugees
d. Human Rights
e. National Legislation
4. Institutional Framework
a. Political Asylee Sub-regime
b. Refugee Sub-regime
c. Human Rights Sub-regime
5. Selected Contemporary Challenges
a. National Commissions and Committees on Refugees
b. Venezuela
6. Conclusion
Chapter 18: Regional Refugee Regimes: Middle East
1. Introduction
2. Legal Framework
a. International Refugee Law
b. International Human Rights Law
c. Regional Law
i. Regional Refugee and Asylum Law
ii. Regional Human Rights Law
d. Domestic Law
3. Institutional Framework
a. UNHCR
i. Memoranda of Understanding
ii. Registration, RSD, and Resettlement
b. Courts and Civil Society
4. Contemporary Challenges and Conclusions
Chapter 19: Regional Refugee Regimes: Europe
1. Introduction
2. Asylum in the European Union: Torn between Protection and Deflection
a. Origins and Development of EU Asylum Cooperation
b. A Common European Asylum System: What’s in a Name?
c. EU Asylum Law and the Refugee Convention: Convergence and Divergence
d. Intra-EU Responsibility-sharing In Search of Solidarity
e. Practical Cooperation: From Information Exchange to the Joint Processing of Applications
3. European Refugee Protection and the Council of Europe: Of Human Rights Law and Soft Law
a. The ECtHR and Asylum: An Appraisal
b. Refugee Protection beyond the ECHR
4. The Regional Reach of European Refugee Law: Turkey and Ukraine
a. Turkey: From a Hesitant Participant to a Strategic Protection Actor
b. Ukraine: A Nascent Refugee Protection Regime
5. Conclusion
Chapter 20: Regional Refugee Regimes: Central Asia
1. Introduction
2. Central Asia: What is the ‘Region’ and Who are Its ‘Refugees’?
a. The ‘Region’
b. ‘Refugees’ in the Region
3. The Legal Framework of Central Asian States
4. Institutional Framework and the Effectiveness of International Refugee Law
a. State Asylum Institutions
b. UNHCR
c. Civil Society and Courts
5. Regional Practices in Refugee Protection
a. Kyrgyzstan: The Case of Andijan Refugees
b. Kazakhstan: Extradition of Uzbek and Chinese Mandate Refugees
6. Conclusion
Chapter 21: Regional Refugee Regimes: East Asia
1. Introduction
2. China
a. A Brief History of Refugee Law
b. Law and Practice
i. Domestic Law
ii. Compliance and Gaps with International Refugee Law
c. Institutions
i. Judiciary
ii. Civil Society and UNHCR
3. Japan
a. A Brief History of Refugee Law
b. Law and Practice
i. Domestic Law
ii. Compliance and Gaps with International Refugee Law
c. Institutions
i. Judiciary
ii. Civil Society and UNHCR
4. Korea
a. A Brief History of Refugee Law
b. Law and Practice
i. Domestic Law
ii. Compliance and Gaps with International Refugee Law
c. Institutions
i. Judiciary
ii. Civil Society and UNHCR
5. Conclusion: Comparative Summary
Chapter 22: Regional Refugee Regimes: South Asia
1. Introduction
2. Background
a. The Partition of India, Cartographic Divisions, and the Refugee Regime
b. From the League of Nations to the United Nations
c. A Myth of Difference
3. Examination of Refugeehood in the Subcontinent and Post-Partition Evolution of the ‘Refugee’ Concept
a. Relationship with UNHCR
b. Regional Initiatives
i. Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO)
ii. Informal Consultations on Refugee and Migratory Movements
iii. Asia Pacific Consultation on Refugee Rights and the Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network
iv. Summary
c. State Practice: India
i. Tibetan Refugees in India
ii. Bangladeshi Refugees in India
iii. Sri Lankan Refugees in India
iv. Constitutional Provisions and Case Law
d. State Practice: Pakistan
e. State Practice: Bangladesh
f. State Practice: Nepal
4. Conclusion
Chapter 23: Regional Refugee Regimes: Southeast Asia
1. Introduction
2. Legal Perspectives
a. International
b. Regional
c. National
3. Institutional Framework
4. Challenges
a. The Relationship with the International Refugee Instruments and the Principle of Non-refoulement
b. Detention
c. Inhumane Treatment
d. Birth Registration/Nationality/Statelessness
e. Other Rights
f. Accountability
g. Temporary or Longer Stay
5. Directions
Chapter 24: Regional Refugee Regimes: Oceania
1. Introduction
2. International Refugee Law in Oceania
a. Oceanic States and the International Refugee Law Regime
b. Civil Society in Oceania and the International Refugee Law Regime
c. Reflections on the Extent to which States and Civil Society Engage with the International Refugee Law Regime
3. The Refugee Laws and Policies of Oceania’s Regional Hegemon: Australia
a. Australian Influence in Oceania
4. Pacific Approaches to Displacement
a. Climate-related Displacement in the Pacific
b. Climate-related Movement and Traditional Refugee Frameworks
c. New Perspectives on Displacement in the Pacific
d. Reflections on Climate Change and Regionalism
5. Conclusion
Part IV: Access To Protection And International Responsibilitysharing
Chapter 25: The Sharing Of Responsibilities For The International Protection Of Refugees
1. Introduction
2. Legal Foundations and Conceptual Basis
a. International Legal Sources
b. Approaches to Responsibility-sharing
c. Rationales and Disincentives to Engage in Responsibility-sharing
3. The Global Compact on Refugees
4. The Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework in Africa
5. North and Central America: MIRPS
6. A Basis for Progress?
7. Conclusion
Chapter 26: Protection at Sea and the Denial of Asylum
1. Introduction
2. State Interdiction Powers at Sea
a. Territorial Waters: Quasi-plenary Police Powers
b. Contiguous Zone: Limited Constabulary Functions
c. High Seas: Near-absent Interdiction Prerogatives
3. Search and Rescue Obligations (and Their Intersection with Human Rights and Refugee Law)
a. Search and Rescue Duties of Flag States
b. Search and Rescue Duties of Coastal States
4. Creating Spaces of Non-protection through Interdiction
a. Direct Interdiction: Co-opting Rescue within the US Caribbean Programme
b. Indirect Interdiction: Deflecting Rescue within the Australian ‘Pacific Strategy’
c. Interdiction by Omission: Negating Rescue in the Mediterranean
5. Conclusion
Chapter 27: Extraterritorial Migration Control And Deterrence
1. Introduction
2. The Evolution of Extraterritorial Migration Control
3. The State of International Refugee Law
4. Legal Responses to Extraterritorial Controls
5. Towards a Topographical Approach to Accountability for Extraterritorial Migration Control
6. Conclusions
Chapter 28: The Evolution Of Safe Third Country Law And Practice
1. Introduction
2. Protection and Cooperation as Foundational Principles of Refugee Law
3. European STC Law and Practice
a. Dublin Regulation Transfers
b. Transfer of Responsibility to Non-EU Countries
4. Australian STC Law and Practice
a. The Right to Enter and Reside in a Third Country
b. Offshore Processing
5. STC Law and Practice in the Americas
a. STCA between the US and Canada
b. Asylum Cooperation Agreements between the US and Central American Countries
c. South America: STC Practice in Peru
6. Conclusion
Chapter 29: Smuggling of Migrants and Refugees
1. Introduction
2. Concepts and Terminology
3. The Smuggling of Migrants Protocol
a. Outline and Purpose
b. Saving Clause
c. Criminalization and Offences
d. Carrier Liability
e. Exemptions and Limitations
f. Non-criminalization of Smuggled Migrants
g. Protection of Smuggled Migrants
h. Border Measures
4. Binding Regional Law
5. Observations
Chapter 30: Human Trafficking And Refugees
1. Introduction
2. The Trafficking Regime
3. Victims of Trafficking as Refugees
4. Human Rights Law for Victims of Trafficking
5. Conclusion
Chapter 31: Refugee Status Determination
1. Introduction
2. The Origin and Development of RSD
3. Systemization of RSD
a. Administrative Systemization
b. Mandate RSD
c. Juridification
4. Challenges
a. Limits of Access
b. ‘Refugee Roulette/Lottery’
c. First amongst Equals? RSD as but one Protection Tool
5. Reform
6. Conclusion
Chapter 32: Asylum Procedure
1. Introduction
2. The Refugee Convention and Asylum Procedures
3. Standards for the Determination of Refugee Status
a. Individual versus Prima Facie Recognition of Refugee Status
b. Status Determination by States, by UNHCR, and Jointly by States and UNHCR
c. Soft Law Standards relating to the Refugee Convention
d. Specific Procedural Issues
4. Procedural Standards under Human Rights Treaties
a. The Human Rights Systems: The UN, African, Inter-American, and European Systems
b. Developing a Right to an Asylum Procedure
c. Standards on Asylum Procedures
i. Access to the Asylum Procedure
ii. Screening and Identification of International Protection Needs and Special Needs
iii. Access to Legal Assistance and Representation
iv. Access to Translator or Interpreter
v. Confidentiality of the Procedure
vi. Individualized and Personal Interviews
vii. Information and Length of Proceedings
viii. Burden of Proof
ix. Psychological Assistance during the Procedures
x. Decisions and Appeals Proceedings
xi. Specific Provisions for Children and Adolescents
5. Concluding Remarks on Procedural Safeguards and the Influence of International Human Rights Bodies
Chapter 33: Credibility, Reliability, and Evidential Assessment
1. Introduction
2. Legal Constraints on Evidential Assessment
3. Do We Have Criteria for Credibility?
4. Divergences in Recognition and Empirical Studies of Refugee Adjudication
5. Which Strategy for Credibility Assessment?
Part V: The Scope Of Refugee Protection
Chapter 34: The International And Regional Refugee Definitions Compared
1. Introduction
2. Defining Refugees
a. Universal Refugee Definition
b. African Refugee Definition
c. Latin American Refugee Definition
3. The Definitions Compared and Contrasted
a. ‘Subjective’ versus ‘Objective’ Refugee Definitions
b. Generalized and Indiscriminate Harms
c. Large-scale Movement, Mass Influx and Prima Facie Refugee Status Determination
4. Conclusion
Chapter 35: Unrwa And Palestine Refugees
1. Introduction and Background to Palestinian Displacement and the UN Response
2. UNRWA and Ongoing UN Engagement with Palestine Refugees
3. UNRWA, UNCCP, and UNHCR: The Debate over Protection
4. Palestinian Refugees and the Politics of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Arab Host States
i. Jordan
ii. Lebanon
iii. Syria
iv. West Bank
v. Gaza
5. UNRWA’s Current Challenges and Prospects for the Future
Chapter 36: Complementary Protection
1. Introduction
2. Scope and Content
3. Particular Issues
a. The Impact of Subsidiary Protection on Refugee Law and Protection
b. Risk of Generalized Violence or Armed Conflict
c. Children’s Protection Needs
d. Domestic Carve-outs
4. Threshold or ‘Standard of Proof’
5. Exclusion from Complementary Protection
6. Conclusion
Chapter 37: Temporary Protection And Temporary Refuge
1. Introduction
a. Qualification
b. Standards of Treatment
c. Termination and Solutions
2. Temporary Refuge: Concept, Practice, Principle?
3. Temporary Protection: From Flexibility to Predictability?
4. Temporary Refuge/Protection Today and Directions for Further Research
Chapter 38: The Internal Protection Alternative
1. Introduction
2. Conceptualizing the Internal Protection Alternative
3. History and Development of the Internal Protection Alternative
4. Applicable Criteria
a. Conditions within the Putative IPA
b. Can an IPA Exist when the State is the Agent of Persecution?
c. Actors of Protection and the IPA
d. The Relevance of the IPA’s Durability59
5. A Treaty-based Approach
a. The IPA Must Be Accessible to the Applicant
b. There Must Be Effective Protection from the Original Risk of Persecution
c. There Must Be No New Risk of Being Persecuted or of
6. The Benefits of a Treaty-based Approach
7. Conclusion
Chapter 39: Exclusion
1. Introduction
2. Background to Article 1F
3. Content of Article 1F
a. Article 1F(a)
b. Article 1F(b)
c. Article 1F(c)
d. Burden and Standard of Proof
e. Participation
f. Proportionality
4. Regional Variations
a. Africa
b. Europe
5. Conclusion
Chapter 40: Women In Refugee Jurisprudence
1. Introduction
2. Well-founded Fear
3. Being Persecuted
a. Serious Harm
b. State Protection
4. Reasons for Persecution
5. Nexus
6. Exclusion
7. Conclusions
Chapter 41: Refugee Children
1. Introduction
2. The International Legal Framework
3. A Threshold Question: Who Is a ‘Child’?
4. The Application of the Refugee Definition to Children
5. The CRC as a Source of Protection Status
6. Appropriate Protection and Humanitarian Assistance
7. Durable Solutions
8. Family Reunification
9. Conclusions
Chapter 42: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Refugee Claims
1. Introduction
2. Overview
3. The Yawning Divide: Law Says versus Admin Does
4. Sexuality and Gender Identity Claims as Paradigm
5. Conclusion
Chapter 43: Protecting Refugees With Disabilities
1. Refugees, Disabilities, and Displacement
2. Refugees with Disabilities as Rights Bearers
3. Disability and the Refugee Convention
a. Refugees with Disabilities and Non-refoulement
b. The Duty of ‘Reasonable Accommodation’
c. Well-founded Fear
d. ‘Persecution’
e. ‘For Reasons of ’ and the Convention Grounds
4. Refugee Status Determination Processes
a. Capacity and Credibility
b. ‘Reasonable Accommodation’ of Disability in Status Determination Processes
5. Durable Solutions for Refugees with Disabilities
Chapter 44: Stateless Refugees
1. Introduction
2. ‘Not Having A Nationality’ in the Refugee Definition
a. Statelessness in International Refugee Law: A Technical or Humanitarian Issue?
b. The Significance of Statelessness in the Refugee Definition
c. ‘Not Having A Nationality’ in International Refugee Law: In Search of a Principled Approach
3. The Sequel to ‘Not Having A Nationality’ in the Refugee Definition
a. A Single Test for Refugee Status: Well-founded Fear of Being Persecuted
b. Country of Reference: ‘Country of Former Habitual Residence’
c. Non-returnability to that Country as an Eligibility Requirement and/or an Act of Persecution
d. Well-founded Fear of Being Persecuted
i. Denial of Nationality
ii. Withdrawal of Nationality
iii. Denial of Civil and Political Rights and/or Socio-economic Rights
4. Having an ‘Ineffective’ Nationality: The Discredited Notion of De Facto Statelessness
5. Naturalization and Stateless Refugees
6. Conclusion
Chapter 45: Conflict Refugees
1. Introduction
2. Understanding Conflicts for the Purpose of Refugee Protection
3. Refugee Convention
a. Historical Context
b. Challenges
c. Individualization
d. Persecution
e. For Reasons of Race, Religion, Nationality, Membership of a Particular Group, or Political Opinion
f. Internal Flight Alternative
4. Regional Refugee Criteria
5. Conclusion
Chapter 46: Displacement In The Context Of Climate Change And Disasters
1. Introduction
2. Internally Displaced Persons
3. International Refugee Law
4. Human Rights Law
5. Issues of Timing
6. Statelessness
7. International Policymaking and Standard-setting
8. Conclusion
Chapter 47: Internal Displacement
1. Introduction
2. The Normative Framework
3. Notions: IDPs and Refugees Compared
4. IDP Protection as Human Rights Protection
5. The Subsidiary Role of the International Community
6. Ending Displacement: Towards Convergence?
7. Outlook
Part VI: Refugee Rights And Realities
Chapter 48: The Right To Asylum
1. Introduction
2. The Relationship between Asylum and Refugee Status
3. Asylum and International Protection
4. The Right to Seek Asylum in International Instruments
a. What is the Right to Seek Asylum?
b. The Right to Enjoy Asylum
c. Identifying the Scope of the Right
d. The Changing Nature of the UDHR?
5. The Right to Asylum in Regional Instruments
6. Conclusion
Chapter 49: National Constitutions And The Right To Asylum
1. Introduction
2. The Evolution of a Constitutional Right to Asylum
3. The Potential and the Limitations of a Constitutional Right to Asylum
4. The Constitutional Right to Asylum in Latin America
a. Ecuador
b. Mexico
i. Challenge to the 30-day Deadline for Filing Asylum Claims
ii. Deportation of Guatemalan Asylum Seeker
iii. COMAR’s Delayed Processing of Asylum Claims
5. Conclusion
Chapter 50: Non-refoulement
1. Introduction
2. Sources of the Obligation of Non-refoulement: Treaty Law
3. Beneficiaries of the Obligation
4. Non-refoulement in Customary International Law
5. Content and Scope of the Obligation of Non-refoulement
6. Extraterritorial Scope of the Prohibition on Refoulement: Practice, Scholarship, and Case Law
7. Non-refoulement and Diplomatic Asylum
8. Constructive or Disguised
9. Conclusion
Chapter 51: Non-penalization AND NON-CRIMINALIZATION
1. Introduction
2. Article 31 of the Refugee Convention
a. An ‘Object and Purpose’ of the Refugee Convention
b. Elements of Article 31
c. Implementation of Article 31
3. The Criminalization of Irregular Migration under International Human Rights Law
4. A General Principle of Non-penalization
5. Conclusion
Chapter 52: The Right To Liberty
1. Introduction
2. Some History and Context
a. A Hallmark of the Rule of Law
b. The Foreigner, Sovereignty, and the Right to Liberty
c. Making International Human Rights and Refugee Law
d. The Cold War
e. A ‘New Wall Order’
3. International Standards
a. The International Legal Architecture
b. Jurisprudential Developments in Immigration Detention
c. Expanding International Refugee Law’s Contextual Vision
4. Rationalization
a. Criminalization
b. Securitization
5. Looking Ahead
a. (Mis)using Fragile Legal Identities
b. A Paucity of Data
c. A Possible Research Trajectory
6. Conclusion
Chapter 53: The Right To Work
1. Introduction
2. The Right to Work in International Human Rights Law
a. The Dual Value of the Right to Work
b. The Substantive Scope of the Right to Work in ICESCR
c. The Personal and Geographic Scope of the Right to Work in ICESCR
d. The Right to Work under the Refugee Convention
3. The Right to Work in Regional Human Rights Law
a. The African Charter of Human and Peoples’ Rights
b. The Inter-American System
c. The Council of Europe System
i. European Social Charter
ii. Systemic Integration of the Right to Work into the ECHR
4. Contesting Work Rights Restrictions
a. Litigating the Right to Work
b. Leveraging the Right to Work
i. Turkey
ii. Jordan
iii. Ethiopia
iv. Assessment
5. Conclusion
Chapter 54: The Right To Education
1. Refugee Education: Background and Context
2. Obligations for Refugee Education: A Multi-scalar View
a. Refugees’ Right to Education
i. Legal Obligations under International Human Rights Law
ii. Legal Obligations under the Refugee Convention
iii. Soft Law and Policy Commitments
b. National Implementation
c. Local Implementation
i. Uganda, 2003
ii. Kenya, 2013
iii. Lebanon, 2016
d. Monitoring and Enforcement
3. Future Directions
Chapter 55: The Right To Family Reunification
1. Introduction
2. The Rights to Family Life and Family Unity
a. International Human Rights Law
b. Regional Human Rights Protections
3. The Right to Family Reunification
a. International Human Rights
b. Regional Human Rights Protections
4. Refugee Family Reunification in Practice
a. Family Definition Applied
b. Documenting and Proving Family Membership
c. Income, Accommodation, and Other Requirements
d. Restrictions Based on Status and Other Legal Obstacles
e. Practical Obstacles
5. Children and Family Reunification
a. Child Members of a Refugee’s Family
b. Unaccompanied Child Refugees
6. Conclusion
Chapter 56: The Digital Transformation Of Refugee Governance
1. Introduction
2. UNHCR Data Governance: A Legalized Accountability Deficit for Digital Bodies?
3. Legal Identity
4. Databases and Knowledge Management
5. Digitizing Protection Procedures: Credibility Assessments and Due Process
6. Conclusion
Part VII: The End Of Refugeehood— Cessation And Durable Solutions
Chapter 57: Cessation
1. Introduction
2. Article 1C(1)–(4)
3. Article 1C(5)
a. UNHCR’s Role and Procedural Clarity
b. Assessing the Applicability of Article 1C(5)
c. Exemption
4. The ‘Ceased Circumstances’ Cessation Clauses in Relation to Stateless Persons
5. Future Applications
Chapter 58: Refugee Naturalization and Integration
1. Naturalization and Integration in Context
2. The Rights/Citizenship Conundrum: Does Naturalization Matter to Refugees?
3. Naturalization: Past and Contemporary Challenges
a. The Nature of the Article 34 Obligation
b. Forced/Semi-forced Naturalization?
c. Assimilation
d. Plural Citizenship
e. Intergenerational Refugeehood and Statelessness
4. Naturalization: Global North–Global South Divergences
a. Regional Instruments, Reservations to Article 34, and State Practice
b. Resistance to Naturalization
5. Challenges of (Local) Integration
a. The Tri-dimensional Conceptualization of (Local) Integration
b. Intra-State Freedom of Movement
c. ‘Self-reliance Meets Mixed Messaging in Protracted Refugee Situations
6. Conclusion
Chapter 59: Reimagining Voluntary Repatriation
1. Introduction
2. UNHCR’s Concept of ‘Voluntary Repatriation’
a. Voluntary Repatriation Is Part of International Protection
b. Overall Legal Framework
c. Timing
d. Limitations
3. Practice
a. Timing
4. Back to the Origins: Post Second World War
5. Reimagining Voluntary Repatriation
Chapter 60: Resettlement
1. Introduction
2. A Brief History of Resettlement: From the Pilgrims of Plymouth to Asylum ‘Trade-offs
a. Early Refugee Population Movements
b. Resettlement in the Inter-war Years
c. The War and Aftermath
d. Resettlement and the Cold War Era
e. Resettlement since the 1990s
3. Contemporary Resettlement Practices in Critical Perspective
a. Sovereignty, Resettlement, and Asylum
b. Resettlement Decision-making
c. National Integration Regimes
4. Conclusion
Chapter 61: Onward Migration
1. Introduction
2. Definitions
3. Seeking Asylum and Onward Migration
4. Dublin III and Onward Migration
5. Refugee Rights and Onward Migration
6. Using Migration as an Alternative Solution
7. Conclusion: Structural Asymmetry of Borders in a Mobile World
Chapter 62: Restitution and Other Remedies for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons
1. Introduction
2. The Rise of Restitution as the Primary Remedy for Displacement: Context and Dynamics
3. Developing Norms on Redress for Refugees and IDPs: Focus on HLP Restitution
a. UN Resolutions and Peace Agreements
b. IDP Standards
c. The UN Principles on Housing and Property Restitution for Refugees and Displaced Persons (Pinheiro Principles)
4. Key Challenges
a. Data Collection and Evidentiary Standards
b. Balancing the Rights of ‘Secondary Occupants’ and People in Protracted Displacement
c. Mitigating Risks
d. The Influence of Gender, Class, and Other Power Structures on Redress
e. Remedies beyond HLP Restitution
5. Conclusion
Chapter 63: The Responsibility Of Armed Groups Concerning Displacement
1. Introduction
2. International Refugee Law
a. State Responsibility for Persecution by NSAGs
b. State Responsibility for Protection by NSAGs
3. Direct Obligations and Responsibility of NSAGs: Refugee Law and IHRL
4. NSAGs as Providers of Refugee Protection
5. International Humanitarian Law
a. Displacement in NIAC
i. Internal Displacement
ii. Cross-border (External or Internal) Displacement
b. Non-refoulement in NIAC
6. Internally Displaced Persons
7. Accountability
a. ‘Group’ Responsibility
b. International Criminal Law
8. Conclusion: Developing Norms and Enhancing Compliance
Chapter 64: The Accountability Of International Organizations In Refugee And Migration Law
1. Introduction
2. Responsibility and International Organizations: The Bird’s-Eye View
3. An Overview of the ARIO
4. Triggering Responsibility
5. Mechanisms
6. Concluding Remarks
Chapter 65: Border Crimes As Crimes Against Humanity
1. Introduction
2. Interpreting ‘Crimes against Humanity’
3. Against Weaponizing Humans
4. Against Structural Violence
5. ‘Cosmopolitics’
6. Conclusion
Index
Recommend Papers

The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law
 9780198848639, 0198848633

  • 0 0 0
  • Like this paper and download? You can publish your own PDF file online for free in a few minutes! Sign Up
File loading please wait...
Citation preview

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

T h e Ox f o r d H a n d b o o k o f

I N T E R NAT IONA L R E F UGE E L AW

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

The Oxford Handbook of

INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE LAW Edited by

CATHRYN COSTELLO, MICHELLE FOSTER, and

JANE McADAM

1

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, ox2 6dp, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Oxford University Press 2021 Introduction © Cathryn Costello, Michelle Foster, and Jane McAdam 2021 Chapter 9. The Architecture of the UN Refugee Convention and Protocol © James C. Hathaway 2021 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted First Edition published in 2021 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form The Oxford and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer

Handbook of

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press International 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NYRefugee 10016, United States of America British Law Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available

Library of Congress Control Number: 2020949095 ISBN 978–0–19–884863–9 Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, cr0 4yy Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

Foreword

I learnt about the denial of human rights and lack of justice before I knew what those concepts meant, legally. As refugees, the circumstances we are born into are shaped by powers beyond our reach. Yet we live the consequences of persecution and displacement and the laws purportedly used to provide pathways to protection. The circumstances I was born into—as a Kurd whose family escaped genocide— shaped my interest in equality, justice, and human rights very early on. My family’s his­ tory of resistance in the face of persecution and oppression instilled in me the importance of standing up for what is right, even when your life is on the line. As the daughter of human rights activists, an ingrained passion for equality and just­ ice inspired me to pursue a career in law. I wanted to understand the power of law to cre­ ate positive change. So, I decided to dedicate my career to helping others find their voice and access justice, as a lawyer. In Pakistan, I was denied an education because of my refugee status. And in New Zealand, when I was in high school, a careers adviser told me I ‘should consider other options’ because law school would be too difficult for someone like me—a refugee with no history of education in the family. People like me did not finish school, let alone end up at university. All our lives, we are trained to survive. Being a refugee means that our existence is based on trying to survive just another day and to reach safety. That’s all we ever dreamed of. Wanting more than safety and survival seemed ungrateful. And there I was, ‘Rêz the ungrateful refugee’, dreaming of things that were not for me—going to law school. To me, it was not just about studying law. It was all the barriers, the stereotypes, and the assumptions that I wanted to crush. To prove that we, refugees, could dream bigger than the constraints of our identities and experiences allowed. It was about taking back control of our own lives and, one day, hopefully, being able to influence the laws that apply to people who are displaced, as I once was. As a refugee, going through the legal processes of refugee status determination, iden­ tification, credibility assessments, and asylum proceedings can be disempowering and frustrating. We are subject to laws and systems that were not created for us or by us. While it is referred to as ‘refugee protection’, in many ways it epitomizes a system that is often designed to protect against us. To keep us out. Theoretically, seeking asylum is recognized, internationally, as a right; however, in practice, many asylum seekers are treated as criminals. The political discourse on refu­ gees has shifted from seeing us as ‘at risk’, to ‘a risk’. Paradoxically, a system designed to protect some of the most vulnerable people in the world can make us feel even more vulnerable and helpless, further exacerbating the pain of fleeing from our homes.

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

vi   foreword We find ourselves tasked with navigating the complexities of legal systems—often in languages foreign to us—to reach some semblance of protection afforded under the Refugee Convention as recognized refugees. Yet, disappointingly, successfully navigat­ ing these systems does not always result in any guarantees. Access to education, employ­ ment, and living a somewhat dignified life in the host country remain everyday uncertainties, as does the prospect of being resettled in a third country. With UNHCR figures indicating that less than one per cent of the world’s refugees are resettled annu­ ally, the chances are slim. My family was told it would be six months before we were resettled. It ended up being nine years. Being born as a refugee in a camp, I was at one point one of the statistics referred to in UNHCR’s annual global trends reports about the number of displaced people worldwide. But I am also part of another statistic: the one per cent of refugees who complete higher education. While there are many scholars, like me, who also hap­ pen to have lived experiences of displacement, refugee voices are still largely unheard in refugee research and scholarship. While many of the Refugee Convention’s drafters were themselves refugees, and drew directly on their personal experiences of displacement, today we see a considerable lack of refugee engagement on issues that impact us. From decision-making outcomes to research that has the potential to influence law and policy related to the predicament faced by refugees, it is imperative that refugees play a key role. Refugee situations have increased in scope, scale, and complexity, and this necessi­ tates new and innovative methods for protection, assistance, and solutions. While the status quo continues to work for some issues, large-scale refugee movements and pro­ tracted refugee situations persist around the world, indicating that things must change. My parents fled for my safety and took me to the opposite side of the world, yet I made my way right back to where they started. I am currently based in the Kurdish region of Iraq working as part of an international team of lawyers gathering evidence of the tar­ geted genocidal campaign carried out by ISIS against the Yezidis, including mass execu­ tions, kidnappings, torture, sexual violence, and other egregious human rights abuses. This evidence will be used to build cases in collaboration with relevant European and Iraqi/Kurdish authorities to prosecute the perpetrators. Finding the best responses and solutions for the complex issues facing the millions of displaced people across the globe requires strong evidence-based research and a com­ mitment to translating findings into impact. It requires input from those with lived experiences of displacement for policies to be developed that are closer to the reality on the ground. Participation begets solutions. Refugee participation is not only an ‘ethical imperative’; it can also contribute to changes in policy, the development of law, and durable solutions that are innovative, sustainable, and more impactful. The importance of reflecting the perspectives of those with lived experiences of displacement has been highlighted in many fora. However, a number of obstacles still hinder the participation of refugee scholars. We need to develop more effective measures for redressing the imbalance in legal scholarship to include refugee voices. We must do better.

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

foreword   vii There are many avenues for better incorporating refugee perspectives into academic research in a more genuine and systematic way. Refugees are not homogeneous, and neither are our voices. Refugees belong to many different national, social, religious, and ethnic groups, and inevitably have varying opinions and beliefs. Therefore, no one scholar could ever represent a comprehensive ‘refugee voice’. As such, scholarship should endeavour to seek input from scholars representing diverse views, and include different nationalities, ethnicities, and backgrounds. We need to create scholarship identified by people currently displaced to address cur­ rent and future challenges associated with forced displacement. To achieve these goals, this requires a prioritization and orientation towards capacity-building and co-designing, to ensure that it can provide a platform for scholars with displacement experiences. Leading and emerging scholars can facilitate research, training, and scholarship opportunities which result in specific deliverables, and ensure genuine and effective participation and involvement of refugees in academic work which has the potential to impact and respond to challenges and opportunities relating to us. The Handbook’s approach is pivotal. As the editors note in their introductory chapter, it reflects a range of approaches—from doctrinal analysis of the law, through to critiques of foundational practices and underlying assumptions. As the editors explain, the Handbook does not simply ‘recount the status quo’ but also challenges it, and in so doing, sets the future research agenda for international refugee law. It is critical that this next phase incorporates a more balanced consideration of refugee voices. The meth­odo­logic­al challenges this entails should not prevent the legal community from championing meaningful refugee participation in scholarship. With unprecedented numbers of displaced people, we need to work together—now more than ever—to come up with practical, effective responses to displacement through multidimensional, multidisciplinary, and intersectional approaches. The call for ‘noth­ ing about us, without us’ is not merely a call to engage with refugees in consultations and research, then to write about us. It is a call to make space for us to use our skills, perspec­ tives, and experiences to contribute to scholarship directly. After all, we—refugees—are the experts of our lives and the issues affecting us, and we should be treated as such. Rêz Gardî, Hewlêr, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, October 2020

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

Acknowledgements

The publication of this Handbook would not have been possible without the support and hard work of many individuals, and the institutional support of several organiza­ tions and funders. In the first place, thanks are due to Oxford University Press and the editors who commissioned and shepherded this Handbook, in particular, Merel Alstein and Jack McNichol. We are indebted to Merel for suggesting that we work together as a trio, which has been both a professional and a personal pleasure. A volume of this scale requires many pairs of keen eyes. We are grateful to our edi­tor­ ial assistants who undertook meticulous copyediting and proofing: Hannah Gordon at Melbourne Law School, Dr Sean Lau at Harvard Law School, and Dr Yulia Ioffe, for­ merly at the University of Oxford, now at Queen Mary. Yulia took on a multifaceted role—an Assistant Editor in all but name, as well as a contributor to the Handbook. Her expertise on general international law, the rights of the child, and refugee law, were fre­ quently called upon, as well as her editorial skills. Over two days in July 2019, we had the privilege to host a workshop in the beautiful surroundings of All Souls College, Oxford, with the generous support of Emeritus Fellow Professor Guy S Goodwin-Gill. The College staff, in particular Irini Hatzimichali, ensured that the event was both efficiently and elegantly run. Our graduate student assistants, Natalie Nguyen, Dr Claire Walkey, and Elspeth Windsor, prepared meticu­ lous notes for authors, which enabled us to share ideas with those who could not be there in person. The workshop, which was attended by most of the authors, provided an opportunity to discuss and shape the contributions for the Handbook. We were deeply grateful to our contributors for the collaborative and generous spirit with which they approached the workshop, and for their willingness to both give and receive feedback so constructively. This collegial approach extended well beyond the workshop, as exemplified by authors’ willingness to refine and revise their contributions—in several cases co-authoring chap­ ters in newly established international collaborations—and to engage closely with us as editors to produce excellent scholarship. We are proud to be part of this community of scholars. We gratefully acknowledge the various institutions and funders that supported the Handbook. Cathryn Costello and Michelle Foster’s long-standing collaboration was supported by generous funding from the Allan Myers Oxford–Melbourne Law School fund. At Oxford, the Refugee Studies Centre (RSC) staff supported the organization of the workshop, in particular, Tamsin Kelk and Susanna Power. The RSC also supported the work on the Handbook via a grant from the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

x   acknowledgements Affairs. We thank the Andrew & Renata Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law at the University of New South Wales and the Peter McMullin Centre on Statelessness at the University of Melbourne for financial support towards workshop travel. Cathryn Costello’s research was supported by her ERC RefMig grant under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant Agreement ERC STG 2016 REF-MIG (716968)). We each owe a deep debt to our families. Much of the final editorial work was under­ taken at a time of COVID-19-related restrictions, so we relied more than ever on our partners and others to take on additional caring responsibilities. Finally, and most importantly, we thank all the contributors for their commitment, expertise, openness, and collegiality. It was a privilege and a pleasure to work with you. In particular, we acknowledge Rêz Gardî for her insightful, important, and moving Foreword. Cathryn Costello, Michelle Foster, and Jane McAdam Berlin, Melbourne, and Sydney, October 2020

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

Contents

List of Abbreviations xvii Table of Cases xix Table of Instruments xliii Contributorslxxiii

Introducing International Refugee Law as a Scholarly Field 

1

Cathryn Costello, Michelle Foster, and Jane McAdam

PA RT I   I N T E R NAT IONA L R E F U G E E L AW— R E F L E C T ION S ON T H E S C HOL A R LY F I E L D 1. International Refugee Law in the Early Years

23

Guy S Goodwin-Gill

2. Race, Refugees, and International Law

43

E Tendayi Achiume

3. A Feminist Appraisal of International Refugee Law

60

Adrienne Anderson and Michelle Foster

4. Queering International Refugee Law

78

Nuno Ferreira and Carmelo Danisi

5. The Politics of International Refugee Law and Protection

97

Rebecca Hamlin

6. The Ethics of International Refugee Protection

114

Seyla Benhabib and Nishin Nathwani

7. Refugees as Migrants Idil Atak and François Crépeau

134

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

xii   contents

8. The Intersection of International Refugee Law and International Statelessness Law

152

Laura van Waas

PA RT I I   S OU RC E S 9. The Architecture of the UN Refugee Convention and Protocol

171

James C Hathaway

10. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 186 James Milner and Jay Ramasubramanyam

11. Moving Towards an Integrated Approach of Refugee Law and Human Rights Law

202

Vincent Chetail

12. International Humanitarian Law and Refugee Protection

221

Reuven (Ruvi) Ziegler

13. Customary Refugee Law

240

Hélène Lambert

14. National Constitutions and Refugee Protection

258

Eve Lester

PA RT I I I   R E G IONA L R E G I M E S 15. Regional Refugee Regimes: Africa

279

Marina Sharpe

16. Regional Refugee Regimes: North America

296

Deborah Anker

17. Regional Refugee Regimes: Latin America

315

José H Fischel de Andrade

18. Regional Refugee Regimes: Middle East

334

Maja Janmyr and Dallal Stevens

19. Regional Refugee Regimes: Europe Evangelia (Lilian) Tsourdi

352

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

contents   xiii

20. Regional Refugee Regimes: Central Asia

370

Khalida Azhigulova

21. Regional Refugee Regimes: East Asia

389

Osamu Arakaki and Lili Song

22. Regional Refugee Regimes: South Asia

407

Jay Ramasubramanyam

23. Regional Refugee Regimes: Southeast Asia

423

Vitit Muntarbhorn

24. Regional Refugee Regimes: Oceania

441

Michelle Foster and Anna Hood

PA RT I V   AC C E S S TO P ROT E C T ION A N D I N T E R NAT IONA L R E SP ON SI B I L I T Y- SHA R I N G 25. The Sharing of Responsibilities for the International Protection of Refugees

463

Madeline Garlick

26. Protection at Sea and the Denial of Asylum

483

Violeta Moreno-Lax

27. Extraterritorial Migration Control and Deterrence

502

Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen and Nikolas Feith Tan

28. The Evolution of Safe Third Country Law and Practice

518

Luisa Feline Freier, Eleni Karageorgiou, and Kate Ogg

29. Smuggling of Migrants and Refugees

535

Andreas Schloenhardt

30. Human Trafficking and Refugees

553

Catherine Briddick and Vladislava Stoyanova

31. Refugee Status Determination

569

Bruce Burson

32. Asylum Procedure Álvaro Botero and Jens Vedsted-Hansen

588

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

xiv   contents

33. Credibility, Reliability, and Evidential Assessment

607

Gregor Noll

PA RT V   T H E S C OP E OF R E F U G E E P ROT E C T ION 34. The International and Regional Refugee Definitions Compared

625

Tamara Wood

35. UNRWA and Palestine Refugees

643

Susan M Akram

36. Complementary Protection

661

Jane McAdam

37. Temporary Protection and Temporary Refuge

678

Jean-François Durieux

38. The Internal Protection Alternative

695

Bríd Ní Ghráinne

39. Exclusion

711

Geoff Gilbert and Anna Magdalena Bentajou

40. Women in Refugee Jurisprudence

728

Catherine Dauvergne

41. Refugee Children

745

Jason Pobjoy

42. Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Refugee Claims

761

Jenni Millbank

43. Protecting Refugees with Disabilities

778

Mary Crock

44. Stateless Refugees

797

Hélène Lambert

45. Conflict Refugees

815

Cornelis (Kees) Wouters

46. Displacement in the Context of Climate Change and Disasters Jane McAdam

832

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

contents   xv

47. Internal Displacement

848

Walter Kälin

PA RT V I   R E F U G E E R IG H T S A N D R E A L I T I E S 48. The Right to Asylum

867

María-Teresa Gil-Bazo and Elspeth Guild

49. National Constitutions and the Right to Asylum

883

Stephen Meili

50. Non-refoulement899 Penelope Mathew

51. Non-penalization and Non-criminalization

917

Cathryn Costello and Yulia Ioffe

52. The Right to Liberty

933

Eve Lester

53. The Right to Work

952

Cathryn Costello and Colm Ó Cinnéide

54. The Right to Education

971

Sarah Dryden-Peterson and Hania Mariën

55. The Right to Family Reunification

988

Frances Nicholson

56. The Digital Transformation of Refugee Governance

1007

Kristin Bergtora Sandvik

PA RT V I I   T H E E N D OF R E F U G E E HO OD — C E S S AT ION A N D D U R A B L E S OLU T ION S 57. Cessation

1029

Georgia Cole

58. Refugee Naturalization and Integration Fatima Khan and Reuven (Ruvi) Ziegler

1046

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

xvi   contents

59. Reimagining Voluntary Repatriation

1064

Marjoleine Zieck

60. Resettlement

1080

Susan Kneebone and Audrey Macklin

61. Onward Migration

1099

Katy Long

PA RT V I I I   AC C OU N TA B I L I T Y F OR DI SP L AC E M E N T A N D R E F U G E E R IG H T S V IOL AT ION S 62. Restitution and Other Remedies for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons

1119

Megan Bradley

63. The Responsibility of Armed Groups Concerning Displacement

1138

Ben Saul

64. The Accountability of International Organizations in Refugee and Migration Law

1157

Jan Klabbers

65. Border Crimes as Crimes against Humanity

1174

Itamar Mann

Index

1191

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

List of Abbreviations Treaties and Other Instruments Cartagena Declaration

Cartagena Declaration on Refugees (adopted by the Colloquium on the International Protection of Refugees in Central America, Mexico, and Panama, 22 November 1984)

CAT

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (adopted 10 December 1984, entered into force 26 June 1987) 1465 UNTS 85

CEDAW

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (adopted 18 December 1979, entered into force 3 September 1981) 1249 UNTS 13

CERD

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (adopted 7 March 1966, entered into force 4 January 1969) 660 UNTS 195

CRC

Convention on the Rights of the Child (adopted 20 November 1989, entered into force 2 September 1990) 1577 UNTS 3

ECHR

European Convention on Human Rights (Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended) (4 November 1950)

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

EU Qualification Directive (original)

Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on Minimum Standards for the Qualification and Status of Third Country Nationals or Stateless Persons as Refugees or as Persons Who Otherwise Need International Protection and the Content of the Protection Granted [2004] OJ L304/12

EU Qualification Directive

Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on Standards for the Qualification of Third-Country Nationals or Stateless Persons as Beneficiaries of International Protection, for a Uniform Status for Refugees or for Persons Eligible for Subsidiary Protection, and for the Content of the Protection Granted (recast) [2011] OJ L337/9

Global Compact for Migration

Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, UNGA res 73/195 (19 December 2018)

Global Compact on Refugees

Global Compact on Refugees, UN doc A/73/12 (Part II) (2018)

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

xviii   list of abbreviations ICCPR

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171

ICESCR

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976) 993 UNTS 3

New York Declaration

New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, UNGA res 71/1 (19 September 2016)

OAU Convention

Organization of African Unity Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (adopted 10 September 1969, entered into force 20 June 1974) 1001 UNTS 45

Protocol

Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted 31 January 1967, entered into force 4 October 1967) 606 UNTS 267

Refugee Convention

Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted 28 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954) 189 UNTS 137

UDHR

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UNGA res 217A (III) (adopted 10 December 1948)

Abbreviations AJIL CJEU CUP EJML EU ExCom ICLQ IDPs IJRL ILA IOM JRS MLR NGO OUP RSQ UNGA UNHCR UNRWA UNSC UNTS

American Journal of International Law Court of Justice of the European Union Cambridge University Press European Journal of Migration and Law European Union Executive Committee of the High Commissioner’s Programme International and Comparative Law Quarterly internally displaced persons International Journal of Refugee Law International Labour Organization International Organization for Migration Journal of Refugee Studies Modern Law Review non-governmental organization Oxford University Press Refugee Survey Quarterly UN General Assembly United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees United Nations Relief Work Agency UN Security Council United Nations Treaty Series

OUP CORRECTED AUTOPAGE PROOFS – FINAL, 05/05/2021, SPi

Table of Cases

International Bodies International Court of Justice Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro) [2007] ICJ Rep 43������241n8 Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v Myanmar) (Order) 23 January 2020, General List No 178, ICJ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������257n150, 421 Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v United States of America) (Merits) [2004] ICJ Rep 12����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 924n57 Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Case Concerning (Belgium v Spain) (Second Phase) [1970] ICJ Re