The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society 9780199566600, 0199566607

The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society presents an analysis of this issue that draws on the best thinking on

302 44 16MB

English Pages 720 [722] Year 2011

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

Table of contents :
Frontmatter
Half-title
Full-title
Colophon
Acknowledgements
Contents
List of Contributors
Part I: Introduction
1. Climate Change and Society: Approaches and Responses
1. Science and Society
2. From Science to Economics
3. The Public Realm, and its Problems
4. Justice and Vulnerability
5. Governments
6. Global Action (and Inaction)
7. Organization of this Handbook
8. Conclusion
References
Part II: The Challenge and its History
2. A Truly Complex and Diabolical Policy Problem
1. Introduction
2. Nature of Climate Change
3. Specific Challenges for Governance
4. Novel Approaches to Meeting the Climate Change Challenge
5. Reconceptualizing the Climate Change Problem
References
3. The Nature of the Problem
1. Introduction
2. Change and Stability
3. Problems
4. Framing
5. Prudence and Policy
6. Morality and Justice
7. Politics and Governance
8. Cognition and Complexity
9. Concluding Remarks
Notes
References
4. The Poverty of Climate Economics
1. Climate Change Is Not a Collective Action Problem
2. An Objection
3. Climate Change is Not a Market Failure
4. Property Rights
5. Cap and Trade
6. Command and Control
7. Conclusion
References
5. The Development of the Concept of Dangerous Anthropogenic Climate Change
1. A New Concern Emerges (1930-1969)
2. Scientific Evidence Builds up (1970-1987)
3. Pressure for Policy Action (1988-2001)
4. Consensus on Science but not Policy (2001 and after)
Notes
References
6. Voices of Vulnerability: The Reconfiguration of Policy Discourses
1. Introduction: Giving Voice to the Planet
2. Climate Change: Why Talk about Words When We Have Things to Do?
3. 'More equable and better climates': From the Early Scientists to the IPCC Process
4. 'First get the facts right': The IPCC and the Drafting of a Sciento-political Consensus
5. What's a Sink? The Economization of Climate Change Discourse
6. From Facts to Strategies
7. Beaten by a Hockey Stick? Perceiving/Performing Climate Change
8. The Vulnerability of Discourse: The Winter of 2009-2010 as a Critical Moment
9. Conclusion
Notes
References
7. Environmentality
1. Governmentality and Environmentality
2. Climate Change and Environmentality
3. The Challenges of Environmental Governance
4. Environmentality and Options for Resistance
References
Part III: Science, Society, and Public Opinion
8. The Physical Sciences and Climate Politics
1. Orientation
2. History of Climate Science
3. Methodical Challenges of the Physics of Climate
4. The Socio-cultural Context
5. Conclusions
Notes
References
9. Cosmopolitan Knowledge: Climate Science and Global Civic Epistemology
1. Introduction
2. Public Science: A Conceptual History
3. Climate Science and National Civic Epistemologies
3.1 United States
3.2 Britain
3.3 Germany
4. Building Cosmopolitan Knowledge
Notes
References
10. Organized Climate Change Denial
1. History and Strategy of Climate Change Denial
2. Major Actors
2.1 Fossil Fuels Industry and Corporate America
2.2 Conservative Philanthropists, Foundations, and Think Tanks
2.3 Front Groups
2.4 Contrarian Scientists
2.5 Conservative Media
2.6 Conservative Politicians
2.7 Astroturf Groups and Campaigns
2.8 International Diffusion of Climate Change Denial
3. Conclusion
Notes
References
11. Communicating Climate Change: Closing the Science-Action Gap
1. Introduction
2. Opportunities and Challenges for Improving Communication
2.1 Inspiration with Information
2.2 Mobilization by Fear
2.3 One Size Fits All
2.4 Mobilization through Mass Media
3. Communication in Context: Some Conclusions
References
Part IV: Social Impacts
12. Economic Estimates of the Damages Caused by Climate Change
1. Introduction
2. Recent Damage Studies
2.1 Adaptation
2.2 Dynamic Modeling
2.3 Benefits of Warming
2.4 Predicting Future Impacts
2.5 Global and International Studies
3. Conclusion
References
13. Weighing Climate Futures: A Critical Review of the Application of Economic Valuation
1. Historical Background to Current Methodological Problems
2. Early Economic Analyses and Valuations
3. Climate Change in General Equilibrium and the Nature of the Valuation Debate
4. The Stern Review of Climate Economics and its Critics
5. Conclusions
Notes
References
14. Global Change Vulnerability Assessments: Definitions, Challenges, And Opportunnities
1. Introduction
2. Origins and Current Trajectories of GCVAs
2.1 Climate Impact Assessment
2.2 Social Vulnerability Assessment
2.3 Assessment of Social-Ecological Systems
3. Global Change Vulnerability Assessments: Five Criteria
4. Two Major Outstanding Challenges
5. Conclusion
References
15. Health Hazards
1. Introduction
2. Climate Changes and Human Health
3. Heat Exposure
4. Policy Responses to Heat
5. Extreme Weather Events
6. Food and Water Security
7. Infectious Diseases
8. Combined Impacts
9. Climate Change: Deepening Global Inequities
10. Adaptation
11. Conclusion
References
16. Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Losses
1. Introduction
2. Cultural Loss and Environmental Justice
2.1 Indigenous Social-Ontology and Environmental Colonialism
2.2 An Environmental Justice Framework
2.3 Backgrounding Environmental Colonialism
2.4 Participatory Parity, Adaptation, and Mitigation
3. Traditional Environmental Knowledge
3.1 Traditional Environmental Knowlede and Climate Change
3.2 Sharing Knowledge
3.3 Endangered Languages
4. Restorative Justice and Climate Change
4.1 Climate Refugees
4.2 Restorative Justice
5. Conclusion
Notes
References
Part V: Security
17. Climate Change and 'Security'
1. Three Modes of National Security Thinking
1.1 Sovereign State Security
1.2 Population Security
1.3 Vital Systems Security
1.4 Different Threats, Different Responses
2. Climate Change-Related Threats to Vital Systems Security
2.1 Impacts of Climate Change on Vital Systems Security
2.2 Addressing the Climate Change Threat to Vital Systems Security
3. Climate Change-Related Threats to Population Security
3.2 Impacts of Climate Change on Population Security
3.3 Addressing the Climate Change Threat to Population Security
4. Climate Change as a Threat to Sovereign State Security
4.2 Impacts of Climate Change on Sovereign State Security
4.3 Addressing the Climate Change Threat to Sovereign State Security
5. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References
18. Human Security
1. Introduction
2. Human Security, Vulnerability, and Adaptation
3. The Critical and Applied Dimensions of Climate Change and Human Security
3.1 Critical Dimensions
3.2 Applied Dimensions
4. Conclusion
References
19. Climate Refugees and Security: Conceptualizations, Categories, and Contestations
1. Introduction
2. Describing the Problem: Mapping Climate Migrations and Displacements
2.1 Dought Incidence
2.2 Increased Cyclone (Hurricanes and Typhoons) Intensity
2.3 Sea-Level Rise
3. Securitizing Climate Refugees
3.1 Realist Descriptions and Prescriptions
3.2 Liberal Interpretations
3.3 Examples of Liberal/Legal Arguments Regarding Environmental/Climate Refugees
3.4 Critical Perspectives of the Climate Refugee
4. Conclusions: Relocating 'Refugees' in Humanitarian Spaces? Imagined Geographies of Exclusion, Invisibility, and Violence
References
Part VI: Justice
20. From Efficiency to Justice: Utility as the Informational Basis of Climate Strategies, and Some Alternatives
1. Introduction
2. Efficient Climate Policy
3. Interdependence as the Strength of the Economic Approach
4. Utility as an Informational Basis for Climate Change Strategies
5. Just Keep Maximizing, but...?
6. Conclusion
Notes
References
21. Climate Justice
1. The Relevance of Justice
1.1 The Marginalization of Justice
1.2 Varieties of Justice
1.3 Domains of Justice
2. A Climate of Injustice
3. Ethics for the Transition
3.1 Allocation
3.2 Unavoided Impacts
3.3 Trajectory
4. Ideal Theory
Notes
References
22. International Justice
1. Introduction
2. Background
3. Philosophy and Climate Justice
4. Targets
5. Allocation
6. Adaptation
7. Conclusion
Notes
References
23. Intergenerational Justice
1. Introduction
2. Presentism
3. Utilitarianism
4. Rights-Based Ethics
5. Conclusions
Notes
References
Part VII: Publics and Movements
24. Public Opinion and Participation
1. Public Opinion and Political Behavior
2. The Media, the 'Issue Public,' and Wider Mobilization
3. The Climate Denial Movement
4. Forming Judgments and Making Decisions about Climate Change
4.1 Schema and mental models
4.2 Values
4.3 Framing and news media portrayals
4.4 Knowledge
4.5 Interpretative Communities
5. Structuring Opinion Formation via Organized Deliberation
6. Conclusion
References
25. Social Movements and Global Civil Society
1. The Origins of Social Activism Addressing Climate Change
2. Who Acts and Why?
3. The Climate Action Network: Transforming the Climate Assemblage
4. Impacts and Effectiveness
Notes
References
26. Translocal Climate Justice Solidarities
1. Copenhagen Convergence
2. Climate Justice and Translocal Solidarity
2.1 Climate Justice Action
2.2 The Spatiality of Struggle
2.3 Translocal Solidarities
3. The Bangladesh Krishok Federation
4. Forging Climate Justice Solidarities from Bangladesh
4.1 Occupation
4.2 Networking
5. Translocal Climate Justice Solidarities
Notes
References
27. Climate Denial: Emotion, Psychology, Culture, and Political Economy
1. Current Psychological and Sociological Explanations
2. Introducing the Climate Elephant
2.1 'We don't Really Want To Know'
3. The Social Organization of Denial: Weaving Emotion, Culture, and Political Economy
4. Interpretative Denial: Combating Global Warming by Increasing Carbon Dioxide
4.1 'Gas Plants Are Better Than Coal'
4.2 'Increasing Poduction of Norwegian Oil Will Help the Climate'
5. Cultural Denial
6. Conclusion
Note
References
28. The Role of Religions in Activism
1. History of Religious Environmentalism
2. US Religious Activism on Climate Change
3. Green Evangelicals
4. Scientific Uncertainty
5. Economic Framing
6. Justice and Ethics Framing
7. Conclusion
Notes
References
Part VIII: Government Responses
29. Comparing State Responses
1. Introduction
2. Measuring State Performance
3. Comparing State Performance
3.1 Current Performance and Performance over Time
3.2 Aspirational Targets, Goals and Policy
4. Understanding State Performance
4.1 Regime Type
4.2 Domestic Political Institutions
4.3 'National Interests'
4.4 National Discourses
4.5 Strategies of Accumulation
4.6 Domestic Actors and the Role of Veto-Coalitions
5. Conclusions: What Makes a Leader or a Laggard?
Notes
References
30. Climate Change Politics in an Authoritarian State: The Ambivalent Case of China
1. Introduction
2. China's Rising Greenhouse Gas Emissions
3. Double Frames: China as Developing Economy But Economic Powerhouse
4. Capacity Building for Climate Change, Energy, and the Environment
5. China's National Climate Change Strategy
6. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
6.1 Renewable Energies
6.2 Energy Efficiency
7. China in the International Climate Negotiations on a Post-Kyoto Agreement
8. Understanding the Driving Forces Behind China's Climate Change Programs
8.1 Costs
8.2 Energy Security
8.3 Political Stability and Party Image
9. Environmental NGOs in an Authoritarian Regime: An Element of Pluralism?
10. Conclusion: The Climate Policy Achievements and Challenges and the Rise of Environmental Authoritarianism
Notes
References
31. Cities and Subnational Governments
1. Introduction
2. The Emergence of Climate Change as an Urban and Regional Issue
3. Governing the Climate in Cities and Regions
4. Rhetoric and Realities: The Politics of urban and Regional Climate Governance
Conclusions
Notes
References
32. Issues of Scale in Climate Governance
1. Introduction
2. Mitigation
3. Adaptation
3.1 Setting Adaptation Standards
3.2 Financing Adaptation Efforts
3.2.1 State funding under the 'beneficiary pays' principle
3.2.2 National funding for adaptation
4. Conclusion
Notes
References
33. Decarbonizing the Welfare State
1. Contemporary Welfare Arrangements
1.1 Coming Issues
2. The Challenge of Climate Change
2.1 Expanded Risks and Distributional Conflicts
2.2 Tension among Policy Objectives
2.3 Viability of the Current Economic Model
3. Rethinking Welfare States: Decouple and Decarbonize
3.1 Green Taxes Plus Adjustments to Social Security Systems
3.2 Develop Eco-social Investment
3.3 Decarbonize Existing Social Services
3.4 Change Consumer Behavior
3.5 Utilize Synergies
4. Rethinking Welfare States: Zero Growth and Radical Transformation
4.1 Redistributing Carbon
4.2 Redistributing Work and Time
4.3 Redistributing Income and Wealth
4.4 Rethinking Population Policy
5. Conclusion
References
34. Discourses of the Global South
1. Introduction
2. The Right to Development
3. Equality
4. The North Takes the Lead
5. Strategy
Notes
References
Part IX: Policy Instruments
35. Economic Policy Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions
1. Introduction
2. Overview of Cap‐and‐Trade and Carbon Tax
3. Experience with GHG Emissions Trading and Taxes
4. Key Policy Issues for a GHG Cap‐and‐Trade Program
4.1 Basic Program Design Elements
4.1.1 Coverage of sources
4.1.2 Cap or price trajectory
4.1.3 Banking and borrowing
4.1.4 Use of offsets/credits
4.1.5 Other cost containment measures
4.1.6 Allocation of allowances or tax revenue
4.1.7 Allocation method for free allowances
4.2 International Competitiveness and ‘Carbon Leakage’
4.2.1 Program scope
4.2.2 Linking programs
4.2.3 Allocation methods that reduce price effects
4.2.4 Border tax adjustments
5. Conclusion
Notes
References
36. Policy Instruments in Practice
1. Introduction
2. Policy Instruments
2.1 Definitions and Categorizations
2.2 Different Instrument Types in Theory
3. Understanding the Selection of Policy Instruments ‘in Practice’
3.1 Patterns of Deployment
3.2 Investigating Policy Instrument Choices
4. The Instruments of EU Climate Policy: An Interpretation
4.1 Market‐Based Instruments
4.2 Informational Devices
4.3 Voluntary Instruments
4.4 Regulation
5. Summary and Conclusions
Note
References
37. Carbon Trading: A Critique
1. Introduction
2. Problems in Applying Orthodox Economics to GHG Control
3. Market Power and Market Structure
4. Solving Problems by Changing ETS Design
4.1 Greenhouse Gas Accounting
4.2 Permit Allocation
5. Emissions Offsets or How to Avoid Controlling your Emissions
6. Conclusions
Notes
References
38. Redesigning Energy Systems
1. Introduction
2. Maturity of Energy Technologies
2.1 Stages of Maturity
2.2 Demand Reduction
2.3 Solar Heat
2.4 Cogeneration and Trigeneration with a Liquid or Gaseous Fuel
2.5 Solar Thermal Electricity
2.6 Wind Power
2.7 Geothermal Power and Heating
2.8 Nuclear Power
2.9 Storage of Renewable Energy
3. Scenarios for Redesigning the Energy System
3.1 Technological Scenarios
3.2 Reliability of Renewable Energy
3.3 Is Renewable Energy too Diffuse?
4. Strategies and Policies
4.1 Pricing is not Sufficient
4.2 Summary of Policies
5. Conclusion
References
Part X: Producers and Consumers
39. Corporate Responses
1. Comparing Corporate Responses: Frameworks and Metrics
1.1 Business Practices
1.2 Political Activities
1.3 Corporate Governance
2. Explaining Variation in Corporate Responses to Climate Change
2.1 Sector Differences
2.2 National Political and Social Contexts
2.3 Firm‐Level Strategic, Operational, and Organizational Characteristics
3. Corporations: Both Obstacle and Solution to the Climate Challenge?
References
40. Is Green Consumption Part of the Solution?
1. Introduction: Concern about Climate Change and a New Kind of ‘Green Consuming’
2. How Can Lower Carbon Footprint Consumption Become a Mass Phenomenon?
2.1 Condition 1: Consumers Believe Climate Change is Real and is Urgent
2.2 Condition 2: Affordable, Attractive Lower Carbon Footprint Alternatives Exist
2.2.1 Availability
2.2.2 Price
2.2.3 Quality
2.3 Condition 3: Motivation, Trust
2.3.1 Motivation
2.3.2 Trust
2.4 Condition 4: LCF Consumption as an Organizing and Recruiting Strategy
3. Promising, but Conditions for Success Are Far from Assured
References
Part XI: Global Governance
41. Selling Carbon: From International Climate Regime to Global Carbon Market
1. Science and Politics
2. North–South Politics
3. US Exceptionalism?
4. The Power of Business
5. Market Mechanisms in Climate Negotiations
6. The Flourishing of Carbon Markets
7. Explaining the Take‐off of Carbon Market Policies
8. Conclusions
Notes
References
42. Improving the Performance of the Climate Regime: Insights from Regime Analysis
1. Introduction
2. How Can We Improve the Performance of the Climate Regime?
3. Can We Manage Interplay to Achieve Synergy with Other Regimes?
4. What are the Policy Implications of this Analysis?
Notes
References
43. Reconceptualizing Global Governance
1. Introduction
2. Concepts Underlying Global Governance
3. Reconceptualizing Climate Governance
4. A Cosmopolitan Corollary to Climate Governance
5. Institutionalizing a Cosmopolitan Corollary
5.1 Individualism
5.2 Universality
5.3 Generality
6. Utility of a Cosmopolitan Reconceptualization
7. Conclusion
Notes
References
44. The Role of International Law in Global Governance
1. Introduction
2. The Contours of International Environmental Law
2.1 The Elements of International Law
2.2 What International Environmental Law Is Not
3. What International Law Can (and Probably Cannot) Do about Climate Change
3.1 The Record to Date
3.2 The Actually Possible and the Merely Plausible
3.3 The Implausible
4. What We Might Change
5. A Conclusion—Of Sorts
References
Part XII: Reconstruction
45. The Democratic Legitimacy of Global Governance After Copenhagen
1. Introduction
2. Beyond Realism and Cosmopolitanism: Three Paths to Democratizing Global Governance
2.1 Democratic Intergovernmentalism
2.2 Transnational Deliberative Democracy
2.3 Global Stakeholder Democracy
3. A Democratic Global Climate Governance Order after Copenhagen?
3.1 The Copenhagen Accord
3.1 Executive Multilateralism and Intergovernmentalism
3.2 Deliberative Multilateralism
3.3 Multi‐stakeholder Multilateralism
4. The Democratic Legitimacy of a New Global Climate Governance Order after Copenhagen?
5. Conclusion
Notes
References
46. New Actors and Mechanisms of Global Governance
1. Introduction
2. New Modes of Climate Governance
2.1 New Actor Constellations
2.2 New Transnational Mechanisms of Governance
2.3 New Multiplicities of Spheres of Authority
3. Consequences
4. Conclusion: Revitalizing Global Climate Governance
References
47. Resilience
1. Introduction
2. What is Resilience?
2.1 A Brief History and Core Principles
2.2 Slow and Fast Drivers of Change
2.3 Adaptive Capacity
2.4 Transitions and Transformations
2.5 Challenging Resilience Theory
3. Applications, Policies, and Discourses
3.1 Resilient Cities
3.2 Climate Resilient Development
4. Reconciling Resilience Science and Practice
References
Indices
Name Index
Subject Index
Recommend Papers

The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society
 9780199566600, 0199566607

  • Commentary
  • scan of print handbook; no colour front/back covers
  • 0 0 0
  • Like this paper and download? You can publish your own PDF file online for free in a few minutes! Sign Up
File loading please wait...
Citation preview

OXFORD

HANDBOOK

OF

CLIMATE CHANGE AND SOCIETY

OXFORD

HANDBOOK

OF

CLIMATE CHANGE AND 'SOCIETY Editedby

JOHN RICHARD AND

S. DRYZEK, B. NORGAARD,

DAVID

SCHLOSBERG

OXFORD "UNIVERSITY

PRESS

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6pp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © The several contributors 2011

The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd,

Croydon,

CRo 4YY

ISBN 978-0-19-956660-0 3579108642

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The editors wish to thank all of the authors of this Handbook not only for their efforts in producing their chapters, but also for their attempts to make their approaches and arguments accessible to those in other fields, and to a broader audience. More generally, we want to express our appreciation for all of those who have taken on the issue of climate change in their disciplines, and brought a full array of approaches, frames, discourses, and tools to bear in helping us understand—and begin to respond to—the many crucial relationships between climate change and society. We received helpful suggestions and comments from an audience at a symposium at the University of Copenhagen in December 2009, thanks to Kasper Mgller Hansen for making that possible. Thanks also to Richard Howarth, Daniel Bromley, Hayley Stevenson, and several anonymous reviewers for advice; and to Jeff Joyce for help with the cover image. Our editor at Oxford University Press, Dominic

Byatt, supported

the idea of this

Handbook from the very beginning, and helped with every step of the way thereafter. Also at OUP, Lizzy Suffling and Sarah Parker were exemplary in their attention to detail. Finally, we must acknowledge the recent loss of one of the best exemplars of interdisciplinary understanding, public communication, and broad passion on the issue of climate change, Professor Stephen Schneider. His wide array of talents are needed now more than ever, and while he is already sorely missed, the best tribute to his work will be the expanded efforts of others dedicated to seeing his mission through.

CONTENTS List of Contributors

xi

PART

I: INTRODUCTION

. Climate Change and Society: Approaches and Responses

3

JoHN S. DrYZEK, RICHARD B. NORGAARD, AND DAVID SCHLOSBERG

PART

II:

THE

CHALLENGE

AND

ITS HISTORY

. A Truly Complex and Diabolical Policy Problem WILL STEFFEN

21

. The Nature of the Problem

38

DALE JAMIESON

. The Poverty of Climate Economics MARK SAGOFF

55

. The Development of the Concept of Dangerous Anthropogenic Climate Change SPENCER WEART

67

. Voices of Vulnerability: The Reconfiguration of Policy Discourses MAARTEN HAJER AND WYTSKE VERSTEEG . Environmentality

82 |

96

TiMoTHY W. LUKE

PART

III:

SCIENCE, SOCIETY, PUBLIC OPINION

AND

. The Physical Sciences and Climate Politics

113

HaNs vON STORCH, ARMIN BUNDE, AND NICO STEHR

. Cosmopolitan Knowledge: Climate Science and Global Civic Epistemology

129

SHEILA JASANOFF

. Organized Climate Change Denial RiLEY E. DUNLAP AND AARON M. MCCRIGHT

144

viii

11.

CONTENTS

Communicating Climate Change: Closing the Science-Action Gap

161

SUSANNE C. MOSER AND LisA DILLING

PART 12.

IV:

SOCIAL

IMPACTS

Economic Estimates of the Damages Caused by Climate Change ROBERT MENDELSOHN

13. Weighing Climate Futures: A Critical Review of the Application of Economic Valuation

177

190

RICHARD B. NORGAARD 14. Global Change Vulnerability Assessments: Definitions, Challenges, and Opportunities

205

CoLIN PoLsky AND HALLIE EAKIN

15. Health Hazards

217

ELizABETH (G. HANNA 16.

Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Losses ROBERT MELCHIOR FIGUEROA

PART

V:

232

SECURITY

17. Climate Change and ‘Security’ NiLs GILMAN, DouG 18.

251

RANDALL, AND PETER SCHWARTZ

Human Security

267

JON BARNETT 19. Climate Refugees and Security: Conceptualizations, Categories,

and Contestations

278

TiMOTHY DOYLE AND SANjAY CHATURVEDI

PART 20.

VI:

JUSTICE

From Efficiency to Justice: Utility as the Informational Basis of Climate Strategies, and Some Alternatives

295

SimMoN DIETZ 21.

Climate Justice

309

STEPHEN M. GARDINER 22,

International Justice

323

PAuL BAER 23. Intergenerational Justice

RicHARD B. HowARTH

338

CONTENTS

PART

VII:

PUBLICS

AND

ix

MOVEMENTS

24. Public Opinion and Participation

355

MATTHEW C. NISBET 25. Social Movements and Global Civil Society

369

RONNIE D. LipscHuTZ AND CORINA MCKENDRY 26. Translocal Climate Justice Solidarities

384

PAuL ROUTLEDGE 27. Climate Denial: Emotion, Psychology, Culture, and Political Economy

399

KARI MARIE NORGAARD 28. The Role of Religions in Activism

414

LAUREL KEARNS

PART

VIII:

GOVERNMENT

RESPONSES

29. Comparing State Responses

431

PETER CHRISTOFF AND ROBYN ECKERSLEY 30. Climate Change Politics in an Authoritarian State: The Ambivalent Case of China

449

MIRANDA A. SCHREURS 31. Cities and Subnational Governments

464

HARRIET BULKELEY 32.

Issues of Scale in Climate Governance

479

DANIEL A. FARBER 33. Decarbonizing the Welfare State

490

IAN GOUGH AND JAMES MEADOWCROFT.. 34. Discourses of the Global South

504

SivaN KARTHA

PART

IX:

POLICY

INSTRUMENTS

35. Economic Policy Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions

521

DAaviD HarrisoN, ANDREW Foss, PER KLEVNAS, AND DANIEL RADOV

36. Policy Instruments in Practice ANDREW JORDAN, DAvID BENSON, RUDIGER WURZEL, AND ANTHONY ZITO

536

X

CONTENTS

37. Carbon Trading: A Critique

550

CLIvE L. SpasH 38. Redesigning Energy Systems

561

MARK DIESENDORF

PART

X:

PRODUCERS

AND

CONSUMERS

39. Corporate Responses

581

SIMONE PULVER

40. Is Green Consumption Part of the Solution?

594

ANDREW SzAsz

PART

XI:

GLOBAL

GOVERNANCE

41. Selling Carbon: From International Climate Regime to Global Carbon Market

611

MATTHEW PATERSON

42. Improving the Performance of the Climate Regime: Insights from Regime Analysis

625

OraN R. YounG

43. Reconceptualizing Global Governance

639

PauL G. HARRIS 44. The Role of International Law in Global Governance

653

WALTER F. BABER AND ROBERT V. BARTLETT

PART

XII:

RECONSTRUCTION

45. The Democratic Legitimacy of Global Governance after Copenhagen

669

KARIN BACKSTRAND 46. New Actors and Mechanisms of Global Governance

685

FRANK BIERMANN 47. Resilience

696

W. NEIL ADGER, KATRINA BROWN, AND JAMES WATERS Name Index

711

Subject Index

716

LisT oF CONTRIBUTORS

W. Neil Adger, Professor, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Envi-

ronmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. Walter F. Baber, Director, Graduate Center for Public Policy and Administration, Cali-

fornia State University, Long Beach. Karin Backstrand, Associate Professor of Political Science, Lund University. Paul Baer, Assistant Professor, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology. Jon Barnett, Professor, Department of Resource Management and Geography, The University of Melbourne. Robert V. Bartlett, Gund Professor of Liberal Arts, Political Science Department, Univer-

sity of Vermont. David Benson, Lecturer Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment

(CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. Frank Biermann, Professor and Head, Department of Environmental Policy Analysis, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU

University Amsterdam,

The Netherlands, and

Chair, Earth System Governance Project. Katrina Brown, Professor of Development Studies, School of International Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich UK. Harriet Bulkeley, Professor of Geography, Durham University. Armin Bunde, Professor, Institut fiir Theoretische Physik, Justus-Liebig Universitit, Giessen, Germany.

Sanjay Chaturvedi, Professor of Political Science at the Centre for the Study of Geopolitics, Department of Political Science and Honorary Director, Centre for the Study of Mid-West and Central Asia, Punjab University, India. Peter Christoff, Associate Professor, Department of Resource Management and Geography, University of Melbourne. | Mark Diesendorf, Associate Professor and Deputy Director, Institute of Environmental Studies, University of New South Wales. Simon Dietz, Deputy Director, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, and Lecturer in Environmental Policy, Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science.

xii

LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS

Lisa Dilling Ph.D., Assistant Professor, University of Colorado-Boulder, Environmental Studies & Center for Science and Technology Policy Research. Timothy Doyle, Chair and Professor of Politics and International Relations in the Research Centre for Politics, International Relations and Environment,

Keele University, UK; and

Chair and Professor in the Indo-Pacific Governance Research Centre, School of History and Politics, University of Adelaide, Australia. John S. Dryzek, Australian Research Council Federation Fellow and Professor of Political Science, Australian National University.

Riley E. Dunlap, Regents Professor of Sociology, Oklahoma State University. Hallie Eakin, Assistant Professor, School of Sustainability, Arizona State University. Robyn Eckersley, Melbourne.

Professor,

School

of Social and

Political Sciences,

University

of

Daniel A. Farber, Sho Sato Professor of Law and Chair, Energy and Resources Group University of California, Berkeley. Robert Melchior Figueroa, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Religion Studies, University of North Texas. Andrew Foss, Consultant, NERA Economic Consulting.

Stephen M. Gardiner, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy and Program on Values in Society, University of Washington, Seattle. Nils Gilman, Senior Consultant, Monitor Group. Ian Gough, Professorial Research Fellow, London School of Economics. Maarten Hajer, Professor of Public Policy at the University of Amsterdam and Director of PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Elizabeth G. Hanna, Fellow, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, The Australian National University; and Senior Fellow, Centre for Risk & Community Safety, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Paul G. Harris, Professor of Global and Environmental Studies, Hong Kong Institute of Education. David Harrison, Jr., Ph.D., Senior Vice President, NERA Economic Consulting. Richard B. Howarth, Pat and John Rosenwald Professor, Dartmouth College. Dale Jamieson, Director of Environmental Studies, Professor of Environmental Studies

and Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Law, Environmental Studies Program, New York University. Sheila

Jasanoff,

Pforzheimer

Professor

of

Science

F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

and

Technology

Studies,

John

LIST

OF

CONTRIBUTORS

Xiii

Andrew Jordan, Professor of Environmental Politics, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change

Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. Sivan Kartha, Senior Scientist, Stockholm Environment Institute. Laurel Kearns, Associate Professor, Sociology of Religion and Environmental Studies, The

Theological School and Graduate Division of Religion, Drew University. Per Klevnas, Senior Consultant, NERA

Economic Consulting.

Ronnie D. Lipschutz, Professor of Politics, University of California, Santa Cruz.

Timothy W. Luke, University Distinguished Professor, Department of Political Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.

Aaron M. McCright, Associate Professor of Sociology, Lyman Briggs College, Department of Sociology, and Environmental Science and Policy Program, Michigan State University. Corina McKendry, Ph.D. candidate in Politics, University of California Santa Cruz. James Meadowcroft, Professor in the School of Public Policy and in the Department of Political Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, and Canada Research Chair in Governance

for Sustainable Development. Robert Mendelsohn, Edwin University.

Weyerhaeuser

Davis

Professor of Forest Policy, Yale

|

Susanne C. Moser, Susanne Moser Research & Consulting; University of California-Santa Cruz (Institute for Marine Sciences); and Stanford University (Woods Institute). Matthew

C.

Nisbet,

Associate

Professor

of

Communication

and

Affiliate

Associate

Professor of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC. Kari

Marie

Norgaard,

Assistant

Professor

of Sociology

and

Environmental

Studies,

University of Oregon. Richard B. Norgaard, Berkeley.

Professor of Energy and Resources,

University of California,

Matthew Paterson, Professor of Political Science, University of Ottawa.

Colin Polsky, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Research & Active Pedagogy, Associate Professor of Geography, Director, HERO NSF REU Site Program, Clark University. Simone Pulver, Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara. Daniel Radov, Associate Director, NERA

Economic Consulting.

Doug Randall, Managing Partner, Monitor 360. Paul Routledge, Reader in Human Geography, School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow. Mark Sagoff, Director, Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy at George Mason University in Fairfax Virginia.

Xiv

LIST

OF

CONTRIBUTORS

David Schlosberg, Professor of Government and International Relations, University of Sydney. Miranda A. Schreurs, Professor and Director, Environmental Policy Research Centre (FFU), Department of Political and Social Sciences, Otto Suhr Institute for Political Science, Freie Universitit Berlin. Peter Schwartz, Chairman, Global Business Network.

Will Steffen, Executive Director, Climate Change Institute, The Australian National University.

Nico Stehr, Karl Mannheim Professor for Cultural Studies, Zeppelin University, Friedrichshafen, Germany. Clive L. Spash, Professor of Public Policy & Governance in the Department of SocioEconomics at WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria, and Professor II in Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway.

Andrew Szasz, Professor of Sociology, University of California at Santa Cruz. Wytske Versteeg, Researcher, Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam. Hans von Storch, Director, Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht,

Geesthacht, Germany. James Waters, Ph.D. researcher, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. Spencer Weart, Emeritus Historian, Center for History of Physics, American Institute of Physics. Riidiger Wurzel, Department of Politics, University of Hull, Hull, UK. Oran R. Young, Professor of Environmental Governance and Institutions, Bren School of

Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara. Anthony Zito, Reader in Politics and Co-Chair of the Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence at Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

|

...............................................................................................

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CHAPTER1 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

CLIMATE SOCIETY:

CHANGE

AND

APPROACHES

AND

RESPONSES ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

JOHN

S. DRYZEK, AND

RICHARD

DAVID

B.

NORGAARD,

SCHLOSBERG

CLIMATE change presents perhaps the most profound challenge ever to have confronted human social, political, and economic systems. The stakes are massive, the risks and uncertainties severe, the economics controversial, the science besieged, the politics bitter and complicated, the psychology puzzling, the impacts devastating, the interactions with other environmental and non-environmental issues running in many directions. The social problem-solving mechanisms we currently possess were not designed, and have not evolved, to cope with anything like an interlinked set of problems' of this severity, scale, and complexity. There are no precedents. So far, we have failed to address the challenge adequately. Problems will continue to manifest themselves—both as we try to prevent and as we try to adapt to the consequences of climate change—so human systems will have to learn how better to respond. One of the central social, political, and economic questions of the century is: how then do we act? In this Handbook we have brought together a representation of the best scholars on climate change and society. We identified the key approaches and selected authors to represent and engage with their literatures in a manner that would be informative and interesting to scholars in other areas and to newcomers as well. We have encouraged authors to make linkages between approaches and to other chapters. We hope the Handbook will contribute to the integration of understanding needed to tackle so systemic and complex a problem as the relationship between climate change and society. At the same time, the Handbook is by no means a synthesis, nor does it provide a unified diagnosis of what is wrong (and right) with contemporary human systems, an integrated and coherent program for research, or a singular blueprint for collective action. While we have views of our own on such questions, some of which will come through in this introductory chapter, there is no unified line followed by our authors as they address the complex relationship between people, societies, and the natural world. Most (not all) agree on the magnitude and

4

DRYZEK,

NORGAARD,

& SCHLOSBERG

severity of the problems. But there are substantial differences when it comes to identifying what matters, what is wrong, what is right, how it got to be that way, who is responsible, and, not least, what should be done. Commissioning, reading, and editing these contributions has left us acutely aware of the limitations of human knowledge—and the major constraints on intelligent human action— when it comes to complex social-ecological systems. Climate change is, as Steffen explains in his opening chapter, a truly diabolical problem. It is additionally devilish in the mismatch

between

human

capacities

to act and

the scale, scope,

and

immediacy

of

collective action seemingly demanded. Nevertheless we have to start somewhere, and we have aspired in this Handbook to commission and compile the best available set of intellectual resources for the multiple tasks ahead. Given the complexity of what we face, no single volume can offer commentary on absolutely everything that is needed. Yet we have aspired to a measure of comprehensiveness in addressing the range of ways climate change plays out in the social realm. Our main task is, then, to lay out the various ways that climate change affects society, and what society might do in response. The authors represent a variety of disciplinary under-

standings and intellectual frameworks that can be brought to bear. In this chapter we introduce the key topics, themes, layers, and issues, before concluding with a discussion of our chosen structure. We begin with the science that first identified climate change as a problem, and how it is received by and in society and government.

1

SCIENCE

AND

SOCIETY

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

While the effects of climate change—floods, drought, heat stress, species loss, and ecological change—can be experienced very directly, their conceptualization as connected phenomena with common causes is due to climate science, which therefore plays a very basic part when it comes to climate change and society. Natural scientists (such as Steffen in his chapter) tell us that there is now consensus in the climate science community about the reality of climate change, and near consensus on its severity and the broad range of attendant harms and risks. But that consensus does not of course mean the science is then accepted as the basis for policy. Climate science does not provide certain future projections of risks and damages. The projections are entangled in assumptions about how human systems respond over time—as well as natural ones. Climate is an outcome of a

complex geo-atmospheric-ecological system, and complex systems always have a capacity to surprise by behaving in unanticipated ways. Climate change, furthermore, is only one of a range of interacting phenomena of global environmental change caused or affected by human activity. We may indeed be entering the unknown territory of an ‘anthropocene’ era where people drive truly major changes in global systems. Thus while the broad sweep of history shows climate change being taken ever more seriously as an issue within the scientific community and eventually far beyond (see Weart’s chapter), we are dealing with complex processes with uncertain outcomes rather than simple facts, and the public

and politicians have difficulfy seeing the drivers to collective action in any simple way. The agendas of climate science are now affected by larger social and political processes (see the

CLIMATE

CHANGE

AND

SOCIETY

5

chapter by von Storch et al.). Thus scientific findings and their action implications must seek validation not just within the scientific community itself, but also within the larger society, and different political systems have different means for validation (see Jasanoff’s chapter). But even getting to the point of taking science seriously can be difficult. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) famously uses language seeped in uncertainty to qualify its predictions (likely, very likely, virtually certain, etc.), and there are a few dissenting scientists who claim there is little evidence of major and imminent climate change. As Dunlap and McCright discuss in their chapter, a thoroughly organized campaign has successfully used such scientific uncertainty to create political uncertainty, with those who fund the case against the reality of climate change having a massive stake in the fossil fuel economy. Skepticism is in some countries joined to a right-wing ideology such that, because climate change requires coordinated collective action of the kind that is anathema in this ideology, climate change should not exist. More insidiously, skepticism may also give the impression that it is empowering ordinary people to be able to question the assertions of a scientific elite. Any lapses in the practice and content of this science (of the sort alleged but unproven in the stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia in 2009, and the admission of a mistaken claim about the rate of melting of Himalayan glaciers in an IPCC report) are seized upon by these ideologists to discredit climate science in its totality. The media, looking for ‘balance’ amid controversy, gives as much airtime to skeptics as it does to climate scientists and others who point to the reality and scale of change (Boykoff and Boykoff 2004). Science moves to the center of political controversy, and scientists respond in varied ways (Schneider 2009).

Unsurprisingly, scientists feel harassed by the attacks of organized skeptics and denialists. To the extent scientists respond with further insistence on the consensus within the scientific community about the veracity of their claims, the more they play into their critics’ hands. The net result is that science enters a spiral of politicization. Scientists themselves in many cases cannot avoid becoming political actors, as they fight for the credibility of what they do in the larger public arena. Not surprisingly, they can and do make many false steps in this arena, and much can be done to improve the communication of science to the public (see Moser and Dilling in this volume). They are also faced with the quandary over whether to admit to uncertainties in the range of their own findings—and so leave themselves open to critics who discredit the scientists’ lack of confidence—or to claim certainty greater than that actually warranted by these findings. Admission of a degree of uncertainty is the norm among colleagues, but fodder for skeptics. One thing we do know is that simply insisting on the rightful authority of science as the guide to action has failed. But the natural sciences are not the only politicized disciplines.

2

FrRoM

SCIENCE

TO ECONOMICS

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

What do scientific findings mean in human terms? An answer is given by economics, which can attach cost estimates to the current impacts and projections of future impacts of climate change. One such set of estimates is provided in the chapter by Mendelsohn, who comes up

6

DRYZEK,

NORGAARD,

& SCHLOSBERG

with relatively low estimates, with costs concentrated among the rural poor in developing countries. Economists such as Nicholas Stern in his famous 2006 report to the government of the United Kingdom come up with much higher estimates. A lot turns on seemingly technical factors such as the rate of discount used to calculate a present value for future costs. Depending on the discount rate chosen, we can end up with massive differences in the size of the present value of future costs, and so radically different implications for climate policy. The choice of discount rate turns out to be a major ethical issue, not just a technical economic matter (see the chapters by Howarth and R. Norgaard). Further

contestation arises once we move beyond the confines of standard economic analysis to contemplate other ethical issues (Dietz’s chapter), pertaining (for example) to basic human needs, and the distribution of burdens and benefits of action and inaction across rich and

poor, within and across national boundaries, as well as between generations. Sagoff argues in his chapter that the asymmetry of burdens and benefits across generations means that economic thinking should not be at the core of climate policy analysis. Once we get past controversies over cost estimates and distributions, economics also

provides a powerful set of analytics for thinking about the choice of policy instruments to achieve the desired level of mitigation (expressed in terms of targets and timetables for total greenhouse gas emissions). The consensus among economists—at least those steeped in the neoclassical paradigm that dominates the discipline—is that market-based instruments are

the most efficient, and in particular emissions trading or cap-and-trade (see the chapter by Harrison et al.). Governments have begun to experiment with such schemes, established for some time in connection with non-greenhouse pollutants such as sulfur dioxide in the United States, more recently extended to greenhouse gases and CO2 in particular, especially in the European Union (see the chapter by Jordan et al.). Emissions trading requires that some authority sets a cap on total emissions, then issues permits for quantities that add up to that cap. These permits can then be traded, such that companies for which reducing pollution is expensive can buy permits from those for which reductions are cheaper. The economic theory is very clear, but the politics and policy making is much murkier. Even before we get to monitoring and compliance, polluters with sufficient political power will demand exemptions and/or free permits for themselves. So when emissions trading schemes

are proposed

or introduced,

it is common

to find whole

economic

sectors

exempted (for example, agriculture in Australia), or established dirty industries (for example, coal-burning electricity generators) favored at the expense of more efficient but less established competitors (see Spash’s chapter). These real-world politics notwithstanding, market discourse is increasingly pervasive and powerful. It informs many discussions of national policy instruments, and extends to global policy and emissions trading across national boundaries. The discourse affects the content of global governance arrangements, which can even be privatized as carbon traders seek to escape international governmental authority (see Paterson’s chapter). Market logic extends too to offsets, whereby polluters can compensate for their greenhouse gas emissions by paying somebody else, for example, to plant trees that will absorb an equal quantity of emissions. What actually happens at ground level in countries where there is weak monitoring capacity is another matter entirely. Unlike conventional markets where one party of the transaction can complain, or at least never transact with the other party again, both parties in offset transactions have every incentive to give misleading information to the public on the real number of trees planted and their actual effectiveness in

CLIMATE

CHANGE

AND

SOCIETY

7

offsetting climate impacts. Again, complexity rules. But whatever their consequences for mitigation, new kinds of climate markets present many opportunities for traders to become

wealthy, becoming a constituency pushing for further marketization (see Spash’s chapter). National governments are embedded in market economies that constrain what they can do, and the social realm is often limited by economistic frames and discourse. However, markets are not necessarily just a source of constraint. Markets are made up of producers and consumers who might themselves change their behavior in ways that reduce emissions. The most important producers here are large corporations. Why might they change their ways? In part, if they thought the world was moving in a low-carbon direction (whether by choice or necessity), positioning themselves to take advantage of this shift might be profitable. Of course this positioning would need to be more than the kind of rhetoric that enabled (for example) BP to market itself as ‘Beyond Petroleum’—at least until an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 exposed a range of problems in its public relations approach (in addition to its safety practices). While there may be money to be made in producing goods for a lowgreenhouse gas economy, the problem is that currently there is much more money to be made in climate-unfriendly activities. Corporate responses to the challenge of climate change have been highly variable (see Pulver’s chapter), and there is little reason to suppose a significant number of corporations will play a leadership role if governments do not. The only corporations that do have a clear financial incentive to take the risks of climate change very seriously are insurance companies. This is especially true of the big reinsurance companies with potentially high exposure to damages caused by extreme weather events. The high hopes once vested in insurance companies by some analysts (Tucker 1997) on this score seem so far to have produced little in the way of comprehensive action. A decarbonizing economy would of course have to involve changes in patterns of consumption, whether induced by government policy and price increases, or chosen by consumers through changing mores. Such basic individual and broad cultural changes that affect consumption have been promoted by a variety of social movements, religious actors, and celebrities. Many environmental organizations focus on consumer behavior—from the individual level up to the decarbonization and transition of towns and regions—both as a source of direct change and as a clear economic and political statement. The ‘green governmentality’ identified by Lipschutz and McKendry in their chapter would help mold citizens of a new ecological order, whose consumption demands could look quite different

from those characteristic of industrial society. However, as Szasz points out in his chapter, consumption choices are limited by the social-economic structure, which conditions the range of easy options that individual consumers have. Luke also insists we understand the dangers of such forms of such behavioral control, even if it does look green. At any rate, changing consumer habits are no substitute for coordinated collective action.

3

THE PuBLic

REALM,

AND ITS PROBLEMS

In a world where the legitimacy of public policies and other collective actions rests in large measure on the democratic credentials of the processes of their production, it matters a great deal what publics think, and what actions they consequently support, or are willing to

3

DRYZEK,

NORGAARD,

& SCHLOSBERG

undertake themselves. Initially, many climate scientists, policy makers, and activists thought

that the key here was simply getting publics to understand the facts by providing information

(the point behind Al Gore’s 2006 documentary film An Inconvenient Truth, for example). Yet

as Moser and Dilling point out in their chapter, just providing information normally has little impact on behavior. And trying to instill fear in publics about possible impacts often turns out to be counter-productive, as people switch off. Most people get their information via the media, but as already noted there are structural features of mainstream media (the reporting only of controversy, which requires two opposing sides) that are problematic when it comes

to communicating climate change. Face-to-face dialogue might work much better in terms of prompting people to think through the issues seriously; but that is extraordinarily hard to organize on any scale involving more than a handful of people. Thus there remain many failures in public cognition of the complex phenomena attending climate change (see Jamieson’s chapter). Public opinion polls often show that people do care, and do want something to be done (see Nisbet’s chapter); but there is no necessary urgency. In practice, many issues of more immediate concern (and which impose far fewer burdens of cognition) trump climate change when it comes to (for example) voting behavior. Interlinked psychological, social, cultural, and political-economic processes can lead even those who in the abstract accept the need for action to in practice come to believe that they personally—or even the society in which they live—have no need to do anything that will impose any major disruptions on their own lives (see the chapter by K. Norgaard). Information, scientific or otherwise, is often processed through the lens of existing beliefs formulated in areas of life remote from climate science. Those beliefs can be very powerful, for better or for worse. Religious beliefs are particularly important in this respect (see Kearns’s chapter). Sometimes religious beliefs line up on the side of ideological skepticism of the kind we have already noted; but sometimes these beliefs can join with the need for action (as in the ‘creation care’ movement among US evangelical Christians). Publics should not however be understood as simply mass publics, which are problematic when it comes to mastering complex issues simply by virtue of their mass nature. A public can also be a concerned public organized around an issue; Nisbet in his chapter estimates the concerned ‘issue public’ on climate change to constitute around 15 percent of Americans—quite high in comparison to other political issues. Publics of this sort can be

found at many levels: local, national, transnational, and global. They are organized in many different ways, ranging from community groups to the translocal solidarity identified by Routledge in his chapter to global networks of activists depicted by Lipschutz and McKendry in their chapter. They also demand a range of behavioral and policy changes, from a radical transition to a post-carbon lifestyle to basic democratic demands for more public participation in decision making. Concerned publics almost by definition are geared for action in the way mass publics most of the time are not. But the extent of their influence in the face of structural political forces and powerful recalcitrant actors remains highly uncertain. Publics are often vocal and visible—for example, at meetings of the Conference of the Parties (COPs) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

(UNECCCQ), or at local city council meetings, but that does not mean they are decisive. And yet, in the face of the intransigence of many governments, such non-governmental publics continue to provide ideas, énergy, and pressure necessary to respond to climate change.

CLIMATE

4

CHANGE

AND

SOCIETY

9

JUSTICE AND VULNERABILITY

..................................................................................................................

Increasingly, concerned publics advance a discourse of climate justice. The political philosopher John Rawls (1971) once famously proclaimed that justice should be the first

virtue of social institutions. Itself disputable, that ideal remains a distant aspiration when it comes to climate change. Considerations of justice have often been marginalized in favor of economic efficiency and aggregate welfare in public policies and intergovernmental negotiations. Yet climate justice does inform policy debates and positions taken in negotiations, as well as political activism. The debate around climate justice has revived an argument within justice theory about the adequacy of proposing principles for ideal situations of the kind Rawls himself proposed. The alternative task for theory involves addressing major pressing and concrete social and political problems, concerning human rights, poverty, and now the changing climate. Increasingly, justice frameworks are being used in the development of climate policy strategies. The fact is that existing vulnerabilities will be exacerbated by climate change. The costs of climate change and the unintended effects of some policy responses to it will not be evenly distributed, and we need, at the outset, some way to measure the vulnerabilities to be

experienced in such an unequal way (see Polsky and Eakin’s chapter). Many of the direct costs of climate change itself will, as Mendelsohn points out in his chapter, be felt by the poor in developing countries. Those costs are sufficiently severe to undermine human

security in terms of rights and basic needs (see Barnett’s chapter). Climate change can have many substantial direct impacts on human health, and many secondary impacts if health problems undermine the adaptive capacity of social systems (see Hanna’s chapter). Many indigenous communities, already living on the margins, are particularly vulnerable (see Figueroa’s chapter). Many initiatives done for the sake of global mitigation—such as biofuels and offsets—have negative impacts on the well-being of the rural poor in develop-

ing countries by taking land away from food production. These people are of course those with the least political power in global politics in general, and when it comes to climate change in particular. They may have justice on their side, but that alone will not give them an effective voice. Environmental ethicists and climate justice theorists have examined the moral challenges that attend climate change, and what ought to be done in response. Beyond the science, the economic arguments, the policy differences, and the actions and frames of the various actors in the climate change drama, lies a normative dimension of the crisis. Emerging norms of justice may play a number of roles in regulating the relationships of the whole range of human actors as they confront climate change. As Gardiner in his chapter summarizes, questions of justice concern the procedures around which decisions are made, the unfairness of the distribution of existing vulnerabilities to climate change and the fair distribution of benefits and burdens in the present and near future (see also Baer’s chapter), the extent and nature of our obligations to both those within and outside our own country (international or cosmopolitan justice), responsibility to future generations (or intergenerational justice—see Howarth’s chapter), and even the potential injustice done to nature itself.

10

DRYZEK,

NORGAARD,

& SCHLOSBERG

The discourse of climate justice increasingly pervades questions of global governance of climate change. For example, the concept of international justice takes nations as its basic unit of ethical considerability—and as such, national governments can deploy this discourse when it suits their interests to do so. So developing countries can point to the history of fossil fuel use on which developed countries built their economies, such that fairness demands that it is the developing countries that should shoulder the burden of mitigation. The response on the part of the wealthy countries is that for most of this history,

their governments had no awareness that what they were doing could change the climate, and so ought not to be held uniquely responsible for future mitigation. This kind of response can be augmented by reference to the huge numbers of rich consumers in China, India, and Brazil who can have thei