255 87 7MB
English Pages XXI, 313 [326] Year 2020
Management for Professionals
Florian Schupp Heiko Wöhner Editors
The Nature of Purchasing Insights from Research and Practice
Management for Professionals
The Springer series Management for Professionals comprises high-level business and management books for executives. The authors are experienced business professionals and renowned professors who combine scientific background, best practice, and entrepreneurial vision to provide powerful insights into how to achieve business excellence.
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10101
Florian Schupp Heiko Wöhner Editors
The Nature of Purchasing Insights from Research and Practice
123
Editors Florian Schupp Jacobs University Bremen Bremen, Germany
Heiko Wöhner Schaeffler Automotive Buehl GmbH & Co. KG Bühl, Germany
ISSN 2192-8096 ISSN 2192-810X (electronic) Management for Professionals ISBN 978-3-030-43501-1 ISBN 978-3-030-43502-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover Picture © wladimir1804/stock.adobe.com This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Purchasing is simple but not easy. Masafumi Horio
Foreword
This book is written with the ambition to progress the field of purchasing by taking a step back and looking at it from multiple, multidisciplinary angles, thus inspiring important novel thoughts and considerations. When confronted with the topic of this book as a cognitive zoologist studying the evolution of thought processes in intelligent animals, several thoughts come to my mind. In civilised societies, we have alienated ourselves from nature and sometimes forget that we are products of evolution and natural selection, like all other living vertebrates. The awareness that our brains and minds have been shaped by nature matters greatly, because it enables us to comprehend ourselves better. It may help us to become aware of weaknesses, cognitive biases and undesirable tendencies that form part of our “human nature” while fostering the desirable traits. When we look at human economic behaviour, it is worth keeping this in mind. For example, we may be convinced that we are using our rational thought to arrive at optimal economic decisions, while actually in some of our decision-making we revert to unconscious, genetically pre-wired decision-making processes that allow for quick processing of information and economic weighing-off between options (see works, e.g., by Daniel Kahneman, Gerd Gigerenzer or John-Dylan Haynes). Some of us may feel uncomfortable with the thought or rather the fact that some of our behaviour is regulated by automated and unconscious processes. But it is important to recognise that these can have an immense survival value because they allow for much faster beneficial reactions (e.g. see study by John W. Payne). Yet, it may also occur that we unwittingly behave suboptimal and irrationally because our ratio is bypassed by other mental processes and psychological inclinations that lay in “our nature”. For example, humans tend to fall for what is often referred to as the “sunk cost fallacy”, also known as “too-much-invested-to-quit fallacy”, their perception of value is influenced by context, the so-called context-depending utility bias, or by physiological need as in “state-dependent-valuation learning” (see works by Alex Kacelnik for summaries). For example, after you once had a type of food in a special situation with a state of physical exhaustion, e.g. eating a certain cheese sandwich after having climbed the peak of a mountain, you are likely to overrate the taste or “value” of that food in the future compared to other similar food types. Sometimes, we might also make irrational choices simply because of impulsivity or a lack of self-control. Undoubtedly, recognising and overcoming such tendencies
vii
viii
Foreword
would help us to optimise our economic behaviour. Further, it may also be worthwhile examining how natural selection has fine-tuned optimal decision making and economic behaviour in other species, because this may broaden our perspective and allow us to gain further insights relevant for optimising our own behaviour (see chapter by Florian Schupp). The essence of natural selection is fine-tuning for efficiency, because only the fittest individuals’ genes reproduce and survive, i.e. remain in any species’ gene pool. Albeit, as a passive process bound to always develop from the current status quo, evolution does not necessarily result in the most efficient strategy ever. Yet, all living creatures strive for maximising their fitness while minimising their time and energy expenditure. For this reason, there are many parallels between natural evolution and economic modelling, such as in game theory. Optimal foraging theory is an ecological application of the optimality model that helps predict how an animal behaves when searching for food and represents a good example in this regard. It has been widely studied by behavioural ecologists in various animal species ranging from wild starlings to bees. It examines how animals develop the most economically beneficial foraging patterns that help them to maximise their net energy intake while minimising their costs given that searching for food can be costly in terms of both time and energy. To illustrate how subtle behaviour can be fine-tuned, foraging starlings serve as a good example. For example, when provisioning their young in the nest, they optimise the load of worms they carry in their beak per trip back to the nest as a function of travel time, because the fuller their beak gets the longer it takes them to pick up further worms. At the same time, studying decision-making in starlings has also revealed that their rational decision-making can be hampered by psychological processes mirroring those found in humans. For example, like humans, they can be tricked into suboptimal choice-making by contextual cues, when having to decide between two simultaneously presented options, because based on their previous experiences they associate the suboptimal option as the beneficial one in that context (“context dependent utility”; see studies by Alex Kacelnik). Therefore, it is sometimes adaptive to ignore contextual information (“less-is-more” effect). Studying economic behaviour in various species may also help us to identify different algorithms and trade-offs that could be valuable for refining artificial intelligence that may exceed our human capacities and employed as a tool in the future. Intelligent purchasing forms the basis for any successful industry surviving market competition. The essence of successful purchasing is a combination of strategic planning and timing, resource management, storage place, the right amount and buffer, anticipation of the developments and predicting changes in the consumer behaviour and the market in general among many other skills. To some extent, it could be equated with foraging in animals. Two take-away messages thus from my perspective: We can learn from nature, and we can gain a lot if we understand “human nature”, i.e. to understand ourselves as products of evolution and part of nature. Therefore, I advocate that we should
Foreword
ix
strive for reconnecting with nature. Even more important, we ought to make sure our children spend sufficient time outside in nature, so they can fully develop their senses as well as their natural curiosity. This book takes a step back and takes a fresh look at purchasing from different angles. I wish the reader inspiration and an enjoyable lecture when “foraging” in its chapters. Dr. Auguste M.P. von Bayern Cognitive ethologist Comparative Cognition Group Max-Planck-Institute for Ornithology Seewiesen, Germany Chairwoman of the Society for the promotion of “BIOTOPIA” (Förderkreis Biotopia e.V.), a new platform for Biological and Environmental Sciences Auguste von Bayern is a cognitive zoologist who seeks to understand how animals, particularly crows and parrots, “think” and how intelligence evolves. Her research interests comprise flexible reasoning skills and vocal learning abilities of these birds. After completing her PhD at the University of Cambridge, she continued as postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oxford investigating flexible tool-use in crows. Since 2014, she leads the Comparative Cognition Group at the Max-Planck-Institute for Ornithology and runs a research station on Tenerife where her team investigates the cognitive abilities of different parrot species comparatively, collaborating with the Loro Parque Foundation, which keeps the world’s largest collection of parrots. Auguste is keenly interested in biodiversity conservation and environmental protection. She chairs the “Förderkreis Biotopia e.V”, an initiative for the realization of an international life sciences platform in Munich, Germany, which raises awareness for environmental issues and enthuses people for nature and science.
Acknowledgements
Nature is not only our habitat, it frames and directs our behaviour. Nature, both the biology of humans and the human nature, is the ground for activities that are performed by humans in daily life. Our professional field, purchasing goods and services, is embedded in our nature and therefore might follow natural rules. This book was created in the spirit of following nature to reflect the field of professional purchasing. We have asked ourselves what the core of purchasing would be, the inner structure of it or in other words the natural way. We are curious to learn from nature because nature masters both effectiveness based on immanent laws and efficiency by best results for minimal invest. We have asked distinguished experts in their field to contribute to this book. All of them have accepted our challenge without hesitation. We want to thank all authors for their incredible contributions. In addition, we want to thank Thomas Stürzl, Alfons Hörmann, Michael Hartig, Keith Mackey, Matthias Renz and Masafumi Horio. They have established contact to experts and did not hesitate to help us with proof-reading and expertise. Moreover, we thank Auguste von Bayern for taking the effort to reflect this book’s approach to enhance purchasing by recognizing its natural way. We kindly invite you, the reader, to get in touch with us and to establish further dialogue on the nature of purchasing. Our dedication is only possible with the support, backing and patience of our families. We want to express our gratitude to Alexandra, Liv Grete, Anne-Hélène, Immanuel, Julia, Hinnerk and Hergen. Florian Schupp Heiko Wöhner
xi
Introduction
Abstract The target of our book is to present purchasing in its natural flow and to reflect on purchasers’ natural behaviour. We refer to nature and see purchasing in a natural way. We strive to overcome the definition of artificial processes that cannot be met in practical reality. Instead, we want to allow you, the reader of this book, to detect and to find additional cognitive glow. In a way we want you to see, to hear and to feel how nature directs the business that you are in and how you can safely and successfully be part of this nature. Feel free to step into the nature of purchasing. You might wonder what “the nature of purchasing” could be—and so did we some time ago whenever we were asked from students, scientists and professionals of non-purchasing functions to describe the meaning and core of purchasing. The range of answers starts at “buy what is needed” and ends somewhere beyond “the art of negotiation”. In fact, “What purchasing is” could have been another promising title for a book, but we choose a less analytic approach because purchasing has got so many aspects that any overview can hardly be complete and discerning at the same time. Therefore, this book shall provide insights to different topics that purchasers are concerned with to allow both a better understanding of exactly those currently important purchasing topics and a grasp of what and how purchasing is on a more abstract level. The analogy to nature can and shall be interpreted from different angles. Purchasers are humans, and business is done between humans. Therefore, it is interesting to reflect human behaviour and natural processes in the light of purchasing interactions. Florian Schupp elaborates such analogies in his chapter on “Elements of Purchasing in Nature” and offers possible interpretations that shall be challenged and discussed. The chapter draws on research about behaviour of animals, e.g. birds, wolves, fish, chimpanzees—and humans—and proposes implications and applications of these research results in the field of purchasing. As an example, the mating sounds of tropical katydid males have a leader–follower structure where the leader is most attractive to females, but the followers benefit from the group situation by extended acoustic space: Competition increases in a group situation—in the analogy, suppliers in a true competition situation are more attractive than the lonesome single supplier.
xiii
xiv
Introduction
There are increasingly smart technological tools to create such situations of supplier competition such as “Auctions as the Most Efficient Form of Negotiations”. ZEW—Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research explains how auctions are the breeding ground to shift the negotiation between buyer and supplier towards a competition amongst suppliers. Commitment of the buyer to the auctions’ results and an introduction into different forms of auctions are provided. Despite the technological progress, key element of interactions in purchasing remains the negotiation with a potential supplier. Both parties have a common target—closing a deal to ensure supply, respectively to generate sales volume—but both parties have different opinions about the details of such a deal. The chapter ““En Garde!”—What Business Negotiators Could Learn from an epée Fencing Champion” by Britta Heidemann and Pascal Fournier offers to learn from an Olympic champion how to prepare in the long-run and to perform on stage or at the negotiation table. From mental and physical preparation to tactics during a repartee, from assessing own and opposing capacities to considering appropriate timing for attack or defence: There is a plenty of lessons to learn. We all know feedback is important for improving one’s own capabilities, but how often do you invite your trainer, e.g. besides other options your boss, to join your negotiations and to provide feedback on how you act in the real negotiation situation? To improve the results, we must improve the technique. Like flora and fauna undergo a permanent change by internal and external stimuli, purchasing as a function evolves over time. Thomas Nash and Robert Handfield present “Purchasing’s Role as an Influencer of Business Outcomes” and give insights from practical experience why successful purchasers are team players in today’s business environment. While operational purchasing of the past followed a command and control approach to tell people what to do and how to do it, today’s purchasers need to win individuals’ hearts and minds. Purchasers need to adapt their approaches to the nature of different problems and the individuals at hand. Thus, purchasing realises positive change and actively contributes to the development on the organisational, the dyadic and the supply chain level. Searching, identifying and integrating new ideas, products and opportunities help companies to develop and to stay competitive. “Innovation Scouting: A New Challenge for the Purchasing Function” is such an area of development. In their chapter, Richard Calvi, Matti Pihlajamaa and Romaric Servajean-Hilst present alternative organisational solutions with focus on purchasing’s role in innovation scouting. These organisational set-ups integrate the innovation capabilities of the internal organisation with the external environment to allow for an effective gatekeeper role of purchasing to gather information, filter potentially fitting innovations and transmit information in the innovation community. On the dyadic level, understanding the status and the prospects of the buyer– seller relationship is essential to realise as many benefits as possible over time. Yusoon Kim and Thomas Choi expand the conventional framework of relational posture with the relational intensity in “Reframing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: Deep, Sticky, Transient and Gracious”. A cooperative relationship is not synonymous with closely tied partnership, and an adversarial relationship is not equal to
Introduction
xv
arm’s length transaction. To put it differently: Consider your top 10 suppliers, do you have a positive attitude towards all of them? The differences are part of the relationship’s nature, and its success can be increased by understanding and leveraging the underlying mechanisms. Would it not be refreshing if purchasers could work with purchasers instead of salesmen? Opportunities for alignment of purchasers along the supply chain are presented by Lotta Lind and Florian Schupp on the example of the financial flow along the supply chain: “Towards Efficient Financial Supply Chains: How to Leverage Inter-organizational Working Capital by Digitalizing the Financial Flows”. The chapter illustrates the potential of financial collaboration by proposing a model for working capital optimisation in the supply chain via payment term adjustments. An analysis of seven scenarios of payment terms along the supply chain shows that significant amounts of working capital could be released by enabling win-win situations with an incentive system. Like a tree that grew a stable trunk and a wide crown, purchasing embraces a wide range of aspects that nurture each other. The use of artificial intelligence is an example that visualises the technological development. Frank Straube, Anna Lisa Junge and Tu Anh Tran Hoang present “Prospects of Purchasing—An Evaluation Model for Data Mining Approaches for Preventive Quality Assurance”. With the availability of big data, future purchasing relies on the ability to use that data with suitable tools and skills. Taking the example of preventive quality assurance as part of purchasing’s quality dimension, support vector machines and k-nearest neighbour are presented as most promising data mining methods. Another view on the quality branch of purchasing considers the measurement of defects and how purchasing can prevent defects. “Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization of the Quality Philosophy into the Upstream Supply Chain” by Johanna Ewald and Florian Schupp derives a practically tested five step approach to permanently reduce the number of quality issues. This approach includes analytics, expert involvement as well as management involvement and commitment. Taking this approach with suppliers lifts buyer–supplier relationships on a higher level through transparency, open and consequent failure communication as well as technical co-operation. Sustainability and the care for ecological and social features are fast-growing purchasing aspects that can be expected to be of increasing importance in environmentally significantly changing times. “Ethical Purchasing—Knowledge- and Person-Related Inhibitors to Consumption of Fair Fashion” by Marlene M. Hohn and Christian F. Durach gives insights why only few consumers buy fair-trade clothing despite many opposing to the unsustainable working conditions in the apparel industry. Such divergence of expectations and behaviour that can be found in other areas of purchasing as well. In addition to these new purchasing branches, it remains worth to take a closer look at what could be called the evergreens of purchasing: prices and contracts. Taking sourcing decisions remains as difficult as evaluating the contribution of the taken sourcing decisions. Roberta Pellegrino, Barbara Gaudenzi and George A. Zsidisin consider “The “True” Cost of Mitigating Commodity Price Volatility:
xvi
Introduction
Insights from Total Cost of Ownership and Real Options Approach”. Many companies approach price volatility in commodity markets by risk mitigation practices to lower the risk of potential losses. However, such practices are often associated with high implementation costs. Therefore, commodity price risk mitigation strategies need to be analysed under the perspective of their costs and performance. Luigi D’Ottavi assesses “The Value of Contracts in a Long-Term Context—An Example Based on the Lateran Treaty and the Concordat of 1984”. This view on the Lateran Treaty of 1929, and its revision in 1984 shows that a durable long-term agreement can become a win-win situation. The understanding of the negotiation is by far not limited to the government-to-government sector. To master today’s and future challenges, purchasing and purchasers must drive the change and adapt to changes. Thus, purchasers require a modern set of skills. Yasmin Weiß and Sonja Kamm take a closer view in “Upskilling for “Purchasing 4. 0”: How European Automotive OEMs Master the Future of Purchasing with the Right Skill Set”. A well-rounded qualification profile combines a general knowledge in many areas with deep expert knowledge and profound experience in purchasing. The future hot skills of purchasers combine the purchasing experience with specific digital skills, e.g. advanced analytics. Nadine Kiratli contributes a view beyond the individual level and emphasises an important part of nature and development, the ability to develop novel and meaningful solutions for new problems: “Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do” . The understanding of purchaser’s and team’s behaviour is essential to build purchasing teams in such a way that success flourishes. On the background of an ever, but increasingly faster changing business environment, creativity is a key competence for continued cost savings and value creation. Interestingly, leadership styles should vary during the different stages of the creative process to reach optimal results. How individual traits make the difference and accounts for group performance present Alessandro Ancarani, Carmela Di Mauro, Giulia Crocco and Florian Schupp in their chapter about the role of confidence in the well-known beer game: “The Importance of Being Confident: Evidence from a Supply Chain Experiment”. An empirical test implies that the self-confidence of inventory managers is important in affecting the trade-off between guaranteeing the smooth flow of goods across the supply chain and cost containment. The nature of the purchasers impacts on their order behaviour. The following chapters combine scientific research results with practical experience in purchasing and supply management, present case studies, analysis and experiments, and hopefully nurture curiosity to further read a selection of the literature references, to get in touch with the authors and editors, as well as to reflect and improve your own purchasing skills. Florian Schupp [email protected] Heiko Wöhner
Contents
Elements of Purchasing in Nature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Florian Schupp
1
Upskilling for “Purchasing 4.0” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yasmin Weiß and Sonja Kamm
77
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization of the Quality Philosophy into the Upstream Supply Chain . . . . . . . . . . Johanna Ewald and Florian Schupp
89
The Value of Contracts in a Long-Term Context—An Example Based on the Lateran Treaty and the Concordat of 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Luigi D’Ottavi Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 Nadine Kiratli “En Garde!”—What Business Negotiators Could Learn from an épée Fencing Champion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 Pascal Fournier and Britta Heidemann The “True” Cost of Mitigating Commodity Price Volatility: Insights from Total Cost of Ownership and Real Options Approach . . . . . . . . . 161 Roberta Pellegrino, Barbara Gaudenzi, and George A. Zsidisin Auctions as the Most Efficient Form of Negotiations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179 ZEW—Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research Purchasing’s Role as an Influencer of Business Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . 191 Thomas Nash and Robert Handfield Towards Efficient Financial Supply Chains: How to Leverage Inter-organizational Working Capital by Digitalizing the Financial Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 Lotta Lind and Florian Schupp
xvii
xviii
Contents
The Importance of Being Confident: Evidence from a Supply Chain Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 Alessandro Ancarani, Carmela Di Mauro, Giulia Crocco, and Florian Schupp Prospects of Purchasing—An Evaluation Model for Data Mining Approaches for Preventive Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 Frank Straube, Anna Lisa Junge, and Tu Anh Tran Hoang Ethical Purchasing—Knowledge- and Person-Related Inhibitors to Consumption of Fair Fashion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 Marlene M. Hohn and Christian F. Durach Reframing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: Deep, Sticky, Transient and Gracious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 Yusoon Kim and Thomas Choi Innovation Scouting: A New Challenge for the Purchasing Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295 Richard Calvi, Matti Pihlajamaa, and Romaric Servajean-Hilst
Editors and Contributors
About the Editors Prof. Dr.-Ing. Florian Schupp works as Senior Vice President Purchasing & Supplier Management Automotive OEM at the Schaeffler Group, Germany. He completed his Ph.D. at the Technical University of Berlin in the field of strategy development in purchasing and logistics and has 21 years of purchasing experience in the companies Schaeffler, Continental, Siemens and Sony. He integrates practical purchasing and supply management work with academic research together with the University of Lappeenranta, Finland; the University of Catania, Italy; the Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry, France; the Technical University Berlin, Germany; and the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany. He teaches purchasing and supply management in Bremen and Berlin. Main research interests are purchasing strategy, behavioural aspects in purchasing, purchasing in nature and supplier innovation. Schupp is member of the Advisory Board of BLG Logistics, Bremen, Germany and the Advisory Board of Xtronic, Böblingen, Germany. Since 2019, he is Adjunct Professor for Logistics at the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany.
xix
xx
Editors and Contributors
Dr. Heiko Wöhner is Director Supply Management Automotive OEM at Schaeffler. He studied industrial economics and management at the University of Bremen, Germany and the Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden. He completed his Ph.D. on supply chain integration at the European Business School, Oestrich-Winkel, Germany and worked as a project manager at the German logistics association BVL. His main research interests are integration along the supply chain and behavioural aspects in buyer–supplier relationships.
Contributors Alessandro Ancarani DICAR, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy Richard Calvi Savoie Mont-Blanc University, IREGE, Chambéry, France Thomas Choi Purchasing Management, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA Giulia Crocco DICAR, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy Luigi D’Ottavi Rome, Italy Christian F. Durach Supply Chain and Operations Management, ESCP Business School Berlin Campus, Berlin, Germany Johanna Ewald Hochschule Furtwangen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany Pascal Fournier Bühl, Germany Barbara Gaudenzi Department of Business Administration, University of Verona, Verona, Italy Robert Handfield Supply Chain Resource Cooperative, Raleigh, NC, USA North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA Poole College of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA Britta Heidemann Cologne, Germany Tu Anh Tran Hoang Department of Logistics, Institute of Technology and Management, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany Marlene M. Hohn Supply Chain and Operations Management, ESCP Business School Berlin Campus, Berlin, Germany Anna Lisa Junge Department of Logistics, Institute of Technology and Management, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Editors and Contributors
xxi
Sonja Kamm BMW Group, Munich, Germany Yusoon Kim Supply Chain and Logistics Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA Nadine Kiratli Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Lotta Lind ABB Oy, Helsinki, Finland Carmela Di Mauro DICAR, Università di Catania, Catania, Italy Thomas Nash American Red Cross, Washington, Washington, D.C., USA Roberta Pellegrino Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy Matti Pihlajamaa VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland Florian Schupp Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany Romaric Servajean-Hilst Kedge Business School, Talence, France Frank Straube Department of Logistics, Institute of Technology and Management, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany Yasmin Weiß Nuremberg Institute of Technology, Nuremberg, Germany George A. Zsidisin University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, USA ZEW—Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research Mannheim, Germany
Elements of Purchasing in Nature Florian Schupp
1
Introduction
Humans are part of nature. Our closest animal ancestors are chimpanzees that developed as well but in a slightly different way than us. Our paths have diverged 7 million years ago, which is why we can learn a lot from each other. Other animals are maybe not as close to us as chimpanzees are, but for different reasons, they also show behaviour that can help us to understand ourselves better. Noë et al. (2001) and Kalenscher and van Wingerden (2011) explain why we should look at animals to study economic decision making. Both researcher groups show that economic and evolutionary theories of human and animal decision have much in common as both focus on profit maximization. The target of this chapter is to reflect on ourselves and to learn about the benefits of self-control. By studying animals and humans in specific situations related to purchasing tasks, this article wants to offer behavioural hints and suggestions for the decisive moments in purchasing. We can read in many pieces of literature on purchasing and supply management and on economics how humans in the ideal case should act. In my experience, this ideal case does not happen very often. Therefore, I asked myself what really drives us in deviation from economics (e.g. as in Stiglitz 1993). These days the most wanted way of studying is to test a hypothesis based on a set of probands or interviewees performing a set task and concluding from this. The last ten IPSERA conferences (see for example IPSERA 2018, 2019) and journals like the Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management have shown this trend. Most of this research is, of course, valuable and some of it is also applicable, but in my view, it does not reflect on the natural behaviour of us humans in the decisive moments, in the moments of truth in purchasing and supply management. Not primarily, the description and analysis of a F. Schupp (&) Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 F. Schupp and H. Wöhner (eds.), The Nature of Purchasing, Management for Professionals, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_1
1
2
F. Schupp
transaction in the past are deciding about the success of the buyer in the future. Rather the role models around us buyers or the natural behaviour of our brain is ruling over our actions. My position is simple. We should know economics theory, research results of purchasing and supply management studies, and in addition to these two, we should try to understand how nature works or better how nature runs. Most likely, trying to master nature is not a good idea. We have seen in numerous pieces of research that this does not work (Grill et al. 2019). But we can learn how to use the natural way for us. I invite you to join this journey by entering into the world of nature, or how Hollywood would probably say it: Welcome to Purchasing Jumanji! You can enter Purchasing Jumanji from the front of this chapter, but it is also possible to dive in at another spot.
2
How Parrots Make Economic Decisions
Krasheninnikova et al. (2018) have tested four parrot species with regard to economic decision making in a so-called token exchange task. Before going into the study itself, the researchers explain the background of economic decision making as being the decision process between different beneficial alternatives in order to get the highest possible return. Such process when looking at the behavioural aspect can require the individual decision maker to overcome his wish for immediate or direct satisfaction. The connected ability to overcome such a desire in a specific situation is challenging from a cognitive viewpoint. It requires to withstand tempting impulses. In the same way, it needs the ability to evaluate expected outcomes of different available alternatives in order to decide if it is worthwhile to sacrifice an immediate option for future returns. In this aspect, economic and evolutionary theories of human and animal decision making have much in common. Both humans and animals go for profit maximization (Noë et al. 2001; Kalenscher and van Wingerden 2011). Kalenscher and van Wingerden (2011) argue that empirically observed decisions many times do not follow the set ideal outcomes of economic or even ecological models and that many according to behaviours can be found in humans as well as in animals. This is why we can and should study economic decision making in animals. Going deeper into the said study of Krasheninnikova et al. (2018), the researchers introduce the differences of several tasks or tests on how to understand the economic decision making in animals, here in parrots. First, there is the delay of gratification task, in which subjects have to choose between an immediate reward of lower value and a later reward of higher value (Addessi et al. 2011). The boundary condition in such a delay of gratification task is that once the decision is made, it cannot be reverted. In other words, the subjects have to wait for the whole time of the delay to get their larger reward. Another version of test is to measure how long subjects can wait until they change their mind to shorten or stop the delay. This kind of task is set in so-called delay maintenance tasks where subjects can stop a steady increase of, e.g. food rewards
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
3
by simply taking the food (Beran and Evans 2006). But the most commonly used task to test economic decision making is the delay exchange task. In this task, the subjects get an at first low-value item. They can give it up at any time during the delay period, e.g. by consuming it, or they exchange it in return for a higher quality or quantity food or object. Such delay exchange tasks are used to investigate economic decision making as they are of similar nature to economic transactions, e.g. observed in capuchin monkeys (Addessi et al. 2008). Several studies showed that in exchange and choice tasks, non-human primates can maximize their future returns by delaying immediate benefits. One example is in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) who trade small quantities of food for larger amounts (Dufour et al. 2007), while brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) exchange low-value food for high-value food and in another task refrain from taking an immediately available piece of food to get a higher-value food at a later time if the lower value food serves as an exchange token (Drapier et al. 2005; Evans and Westergaard 2006). In a very recent review, Addessi et al. (2020) analyze evidence for human economic behaviours in non-human primates. The researchers show to what extent non-human primates share economic abilities with humans and conclude that it is not a question if, but to what extent non-human primates can decide economically. The difference in specifics seems not to be the cognitive ability as such, but the limits to conclude out of different sources of information (Addessi et al. 2020). The same ability to optimize pay-off at a later stage as well exists in non-primate species. Here, studies have been made with dogs (Canis familiaris, Leonardi et al. 2012), sea-lions (Zalophus californianus, Genty and Roeder 2006), and as in the present sub-chapter also with large-brained birds such as corvids (Dufour et al. 2011; Hillemann et al. 2014) and parrots (Cacatua coffini, Auersperg et al. 2013; Psittacus erithacus, Vick et al. 2010; Psittacus erithacus, Koepke et al. 2015). The performance of the different species in such delayed exchange tasks is mixed as the tolerance of delay ranges from minutes to seconds (Hillemann et al. 2014; Auersperg et al. 2013; Wascher et al. 2012). A first takeaway for purchasing in this regard is that the tolerance of delay depends on the question if either quantity or quality of return shall be optimized. Other points have been found when comparing primates with other species. For example, animals that do not have functional hands such as birds or dogs classically have to keep the tradeable food in their mouth. In such cases, it was difficult for them to hold the food in contact with their taste organs making it more difficult to hold the impulse to eat (Leonardi et al. 2012; Wascher et al. 2012). An elegant solution to this problem is possible by implementing tokens as symbolic representation of food that could be traded for reward as a kind of money (Brosnan and de Waal 2004; Addessi et al. 2014; Hackenberg 2009). Substituting real food items indeed supported the subjects’ improvements with or in primates (Addessi and Rossi 2010). The task can be played with tokens only and also with tokens and physically present food as a return. Beran and Evans have worked with chimpanzees to choose between a food item and a token that could be exchanged for a
4
F. Schupp
higher-quality food item (Beran and Evans 2006). The chimpanzees tended to select an additional exchange rather than the immediate food return. Similar results were found with capuchin monkeys (Judge and Essler 2013). However, with or in birds, the token exchange methodology to test economic decision making has not been used before the one of Krasheninnikova et al. (2018). Other than already present exchange tasks in a tool-use context to get to higher-value food, Krasheninnikova et al. (2018) used tokens that could be exchanged for another food reward in the future. They used three different food rewards in low-, medium-, and high-quality food associated with three different tokens. The researchers’ tool-related studies are also interesting to be compared with other studies that are presented later in this chapter on tool-use in chimpanzees with respective conclusions on cultural aspects (Whiten et al. 1999; Goodall 1986). Krasheninnikova et al. (2018) studied whether parrots could learn to associate different tokens with different types of food and if the parrots would select such token for a later food reward before a directly available food with a lower value. The decisive point then was to see if the parrots would behave economically, i.e. they would maximize their profits. In such a case, the researchers could predict the parrots choosing the most profitable option and avoiding unnecessary effort. Four parrot species were tested. The great green macaws (Ara ambiguus) and the blue-throated macaws (Ara glaucogularis) are feeding specialist, i.e. they heavily rely on specific food such as mountain almond trees and motacu palm fruit. The other two species in the experiment were African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and blue-headed macaws (Primolius couloni) which both are generalist feeders that eat various types of seeds and nuts. The blue-headed macaws live in a nomadic style. Knowing this, we would assume that feeding specialist might have a greater need for optimal decision making than feeding generalists that might behave opportunistically when encountering food options. The result of the study is manifold. First, the parrots of all four species behaved according to expectation by selecting tokens first that were associated with more preferred food. These findings are in line with previous studies with other primates such as capuchin monkeys (Brosnan and de Waal 2004; Addessi et al. 2007) showing that the parrots indeed gave value to the tokens. Regardless of the value of the immediate gain with low or medium value, all four species of parrots inhibited their impulses and chose a token to exchange for preferred food. In fact, for the low-value food, they performed as good as chimpanzees and better than capuchin monkeys or Goffin cockatoos. This shows the high level of self-control that these four parrot species have. In professional purchasing, this can also be observed as buyers sometimes are offered a lower money payment today compared to a later price reduction on a piece price in the sense of a token exchange. Sellers offer an exclusive one-time payment and ask for giving up price reductions in the future. Most of the buyers that I have worked with chose the token over the immediate payment. The counter-test also worked in parrots, as the birds did not choose a low-value token over immediate higher-value food even when the food was not the preferred one.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
5
However, some blue-throated and blue-headed macaws showed some mistakes in valuing medium-value tokens against low-value food showing that if the difference between the returns was not very differentiated, they had a hard time to decide. Another phenomenon was observed with blue-headed macaws and grey parrots who decided for high-value tokens instead of the most preferred food now. This indicates that some individuals gave the token an intrinsic value. The latter I have already observed in the business-to-business purchasing context when buyers would go, e.g. for a prolongation of payment terms in the future with equal value to today’s payment. They gave the token payment terms an intrinsic value that can even be higher than the monetary payment today. I observed the decision prohibition or lack of decision when future token values were not sharply different to today’s benefits. On a group level, great green macaws performed best in all six test conditions, which indicates that amongst parrots we can find species that take better economic decisions than others do. In my view, both points are also the case for or in humans. Some humans are more capable than others to perform economic decision tasks on maximizing profits while all humans have a certain need and experience to do so. Moreover, I can see that group behaviour and individual behaviour can differ. Another result that is also interesting is when blue-throated macaws performed well overall but showed a weaker performance only when the token offered was of fairly low value compared to the immediate reward (see explanation above). The researchers assume a motivation problem here. We can observe this phenomenon also in purchasing or in soccer when sellers are negotiating with less important customers or buyers with supposedly less important suppliers or in soccer when a top team faces a team more present at the lower end of the table. Here, motivation plays are more significant role over the reward mechanism even if the game and the frame conditions are still the same. Of course, the more relevant problem case is the assumed go along with smaller purchasing volume suppliers, where the negotiation cake has an absolutely lower value than the one with bigger suppliers. Relatively, the game is the same, but it contains motivation problems here. In such cases, we can also learn from blue-throated macaws that overall good performance does not prevent from motivational issues in specific situations. One reference to the African grey parrots again, as they failed to optimize their choice when the token had the exact same value than the food. Sometimes, they chose the token which represented an unnecessary effort. I observed this behaviour also with buyers. The buyers could have simply taken the immediate money instead of trading it in for a later reward. With some parrot species, this behaviour is explained by strong tendencies to engage in object play (Auersperg et al. 2015). Like suggested by the researchers also, I would like to test whether increasing the costliness of the token exchange, e.g. by prolonging the waiting time for the return, would change the behaviour of the players. Concretely, I observe that sometimes buyers negotiate just for the sake of negotiation, in other words for the play and not for the result. By changing the values of later reward or by explaining the cost of the token more explicitly by a discounting calculation process to be set as a rule, this
6
F. Schupp
problem can be avoided in the purchasing environment. Of course, same can be true for sellers from their perspective. Finally, I would like to look at the performance of the parrots regarding Condition 6 in the test where high-value tokens were offered versus high-value food today. Here, the feeding specialists, the great green macaws and the blue-throated macaws, perform best and significantly better than the feeding generalists as being the blue-headed macaws and the African grey parrots. One explanation could be that the feeding specialists know their specific need over general food and therefore act more economically. Researchers do not know the exact cognitive demands of the species’ feeding ecologies, but for the first time, such a difference was observed in a clear way. It means that feeding specialists act more economically than feeding generalists in the test. Seen in the business-to-business environment, some purchasers might be prone to a more specific food compared to other more generalist purchasers. I refer to the statement of ‘money is money’ as a question. Sometimes, purchasers are confronted with the question to get a bonus payment for past business versus a price reduction of same value for the same goods going forward. In such cases, money might not be money. Specifically, some buying companies are feeding specialists based on aggressive prices for the products going forward. Others prefer bonus payments in a more general way. Within this aspect, there might also be differences between non-purchasing professionals and purchasing professionals in a buying company or in a selling company vice versa. In my observation, especially the longer negotiations go on, the faster non-purchasing players give in and accept the earlier and potentially lower reward in the sense of a delay exchange. This of course can as well happen to buyers, but maybe less to purchasing specialists as they might rather carry the role of feeding specialists. When referring to feeding ecology, some purchasing specialist can be seen as feeding specialist that clearly can decide better for high-value food now over a high-value token later. Both behaviours can be observed in business-to-business purchasing environments. On the one hand, generalists and opportunistic buyers may decide less economically as they take any kind of monetary food represented by a high-value token later. On the other hand, they might decisively take the immediate reward with high value before an equally valuable token reward at a later stage, e.g. in form of prolongated payment terms or an investment of the supplier in a new machine. The latter is especially the case for buyers that are being measured on year-on-year savings only. Those buyers are specialized on competitive purchase prices and therefore might act more economically than buyers that also are allowed to accept savings as one-time bonus payments for a good business in the past, but without price reduction in the next period. In any case, in animals, a clear correlation between economic decision making and feeding ecology should be considered with precaution until more data is becoming available. However, the cited study with four parrot species shows discussed correlation.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
7
All parrots in the study of Krasheninnikova et al. (2018) were able to inhibit their impulse reactions if it led to an increased return. Particularly, the two larger macaws were even equally good or better than the performance of primates in comparable conditions. In critical control questions, they even optimized their behaviour and consequently decided economically. If you reached this point of the present chapter of this book, you have got a first understanding of what I mean with elements of purchasing in nature. For the next paragraphs, I will stay with birds, starting with zebra finches.
3
Behaviour Compatibility Results in a Positive Biological Effect
Ihle et al. (2015) brought zebra finches together who live in monogamous, lifelong partnerships. Their research question was if sympathy or affection has a biological effect on the zebra finches. Ihle et al. (2015) clarify that in the zoological context, the term behavioural compatibility is used to describe the fit of partners. Zebra finches select their partners by their behavioural fit and not that much by their singing abilities or their colour. The scientists have set up a dating scenario with the zebra finches, where alike many other bird types the males sing, and the females choose (Bodderas 2015). Ihle et al. (2015) have brought 20 males and 20 females together to let them sing and choose. For females, to choose from 20 is a low number in zebra finch nature. Normally, they select out of several hundreds. In Ihle et al.’s test, it took some birds weeks to select, while others were ready after two days. The record found was partner choice in 2 h. But, half of the observed marriages ended in divorce. In the next step, the researchers continued their experiment and brought divorced zebra finches together for second marriages. Most of these partnerships also broke apart, others lasted. Then the researchers compared the number of eggs in the nest of both groups, lasting partnerships and new partnerships, after having been divorced in the first period. In the latter, many eggs have not been fertilized and more chicks died early after birth. The result is unambiguously clear. Zebra finches that found the partner for life get more descendants. This seems especially true in monogamous contexts. The birds in partnerships have to adjust their behaviour by motivating each other, by coordinating tasks, and by sharing tasks. After 1700 h of observation, the researchers did not find the reason or triggering element for attraction, but when the birds found each other, their level of harmony was remarkable. They sit next to each other, they clean each other, and they move in a synchronous way. For purchasing, many aspects can be transferred and learned from this experiment. During supplier selection, many dates have to be made to finally select the supplier partner for a specific component or specific good. The selection phase takes place with geographical context and under the assumption of time constraints. For new categories to be purchased and also for components that are already bought
8
F. Schupp
for a long time, usually many suppliers have to be analyzed. According to my experience in new categories, greater than 40 supplying companies are analyzed before the real supplier selection takes place. If a component is already bought for a long period of time and this in a larger amount of similar but not same items, many times more than 100 suppliers of the same component or category group are selected over time, which suggests that also buying organizations search for the right partner to stay with under the boundary condition of relevant transfer cost between one and the other suppliers. Beyond this, also in organizational interaction with a buying and supplying context, those organizational relationships that are based on similar behaviour patterns and on similarity create attraction between buying firm and supplying firm leading to longer lasting relationships. If the number of descendants of such long lasting relationships is comparably larger than of shorter relationships remains to be open in the purchasing context. However, if a certain harmony can be observed between buying and selling organization, my observation clearly points into the direction of more common developments on product and process level. As Ihle et al. (2015) did not study attraction as such, I would like to draw your attention to the following species, the white-crowned sparrow.
4
Choose Your Songs
Birds sing at minimum for two reasons. Most of the times, males sing in order to attract females and to keep rivals out of their territory (Catchpole and Slater 2008). This means that singing is a permanent change between attraction and aggression (Riechelmann 2016). More complicated to understand is the question if birds always sing the same songs or if they change their songs with the new year. For nightingales, this question has been researched well (Catchpole and Slater 2008). The nightingale males do only merely change their songs over lifetime. They mostly keep the songs that they learn in the first year and only add or change small elements over time. The conclusion is that when they die after 6–7 years, also their individual songs die. This is different for canaries, as every winter they regress those brain areas that are responsible for song learning and memorizing them (Catchpole and Slater 2008). In each spring season, the respective brain area grows again, which means that the birds have to learn their songs over again. This is also one proof that nerve death and nerve growth are present which means that nerve cells can be renewed within an individual life and that they do it in the context and presence of learning. Purchasers sometimes are said to sing the same songs every year again. Savings, and more savings, or for a special market situation, the buying company asks for a special contribution of the suppliers to the bottom-line of the buyers. This song might scare off suppliers more than attracting them. Therefore, and in order to attract suppliers, buyers should change their songs from time to time, maybe even every spring season. The buyers could select another business area to create attraction and to motivate potential suppliers to quote for available business.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
9
On the other hand, singing a known song might only attract known suppliers and might at the same time scare off suppliers that could add value if being attracted. Partially, good news in the context of birds, here with white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys), has been found by Derryberry. She identified that both male and female white-crowned sparrows respond more strongly to current than to historical songs, ‘indicating that historical songs are less effective as signals in the current contexts of both mate choice and male–male competition’ (Derryberry 2007). This suggests that signal evolution within specific populations, that includes geographical specifics, may contribute to the formation of behavioural barriers between populations (Derryberry 2007). For us in purchasing this means that very old songs are potentially not remembered and can be used, but on the other hand, the songs that are used have to fit to the current context of the partners that you work with. Otherwise, your messages will not be received well. One way or the other, I clearly recommend revisiting the songs that you sing. Extending the learnings from birds, the following paragraph targets to learn from crows in a direct comparison with humans.
5
Crows Show Individual Preferences When Using Tools
In their study, Danel et al. (2017) investigate the tool usage of distantly related habitually tool-using vertebrate species, specifically the New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides), with respect to using tools depending on their necessity (Danel et al. 2017). A comparison is done with adult humans and in addition to children aged from three to five years. The set task was to choose between a body part and a tool in order to get a reward out of a box. Crows were confronted to use their beak or a tool. Humans had to choose between their hand and a tool. For both species, the tool was a wooden stick that could be fetched to move the reward out of the box by inserting the tool into a hole and sliding the reward to the side. Alternatively, the subjects had to open two windows successively in order to take the reward out of the box by beak or by hand. The very interesting result of the test was that adult humans could accurately weigh up between the two options regarding cost and benefit in terms of time and effort and therefore decided for the less costly and more beneficial offer irrespective of involved tool usage or not. By the way, it is proven in other studies that adult humans may have the tendency to overestimate the benefits out of tool usage in general (Osiurak et al. 2014). This aspect might be relevant for professional purchasing in these days, as according to my observation many buying companies tend to overestimate the benefits of production tools with suppliers, especially when the purchaser wants to buy a technically challenging product. Other than humans, the crows, however, did not show any preference for using the beak tor the tool. They also did not appear to behave economically neither at the group nor at the individual level. Of course, the authors explain this finding by cognitive skills that might lack to make economic decisions in the context of using
10
F. Schupp
tools. One prerequisite to economic decisions is to be able to assess the amount of time and effort linked to each opportunity and weighing up between them. Secondly, the task also requires some inhibitory control or motor self-control to avoid silent stimuli of food leading to impulsive reactions of the animals like presented in the first case of this chapter when looking at parrots. Both phenomena, however, can be treated with a low likelihood in their presence, as in other tests New Caledonian crows showed remarkable cognitive skills allowing them to plan action sequences involving several steps to reach their goal (Taylor et al. 2007). Crows are also good at inhibiting impulsive motor actions (Kabadayi et al. 2016), and related corvids show to be capable of weighing up between different options at different points of time (Hillemann et al. 2014). However, when looking at the individual performance of the crows, the researchers found significant preference for either usage of tool or beak that they tested and confirmed additionally. The explanation for this behaviour could be done through neophobic responses coming out of their natural environment and leading to shy behaviour when touching the unknown tools or vice versa through an individual difference in the propensity of the use of tools within a defined population leading to a preference for tools. This might be a reason for the overestimated benefits of tool usage by humans and will, related to animals, be further discussed in the cultural contexts regarding characteristic behaviour of populations in the following paragraph of this article. Coming back to humans, researchers also investigated the behaviour development of 3–5-year-old humans. Here the 3–4-year-old group did not behave economically nor was it showing any bias for using tools. In fact, most of them chose randomly. However, the pattern of the adult humans could be found at five-year-old humans as well. This means that a development towards economic decision making, goal-directing actions, and the effective employment of tools is developed at humans at the age of five. Looking at purchasing practice, these findings can be discussed as well. Undoubtedly, the ability for economic decision making is present with purchasers. But very often, purchasers are deciding by using their body in form of their mouth or sometimes even their handshake in preference over a contractual agreement or the usage of a tool when negotiating with a supplier and when taking supplier decisions, the so-called sourcing decisions. Such a tool could be an IT-based sourcing platform or more traditionally it could be a written contract. My observation in this field is that not all purchasers see the economic benefit of manifesting the negotiation result in a contractual agreement right after or with the end of the negotiation, as the negative consequence out of not having a contract could come with a significant time lag only. In that sense, the purchasers either show the limits of their ability for economic decision making or the usage of the mouth or handshake instead of a tool as being the preferred instrument maybe even on a cultural bias. The other way around, a fully professional and sound purchasing organization has to ensure the transparency of an over a long period discounted economic decision. Purchasing has the target to allow a tool-supported economic decision making over the simple usage of a mouth or handshake in the negotiation field. We
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
11
should also consider that instruments like email might be a cultural trait that could either support the tool usage economics or be counterproductive as not all emails would hold for a contractual agreement in the long run. Staying with young members of a species, the following paragraph focuses again on corvids and parrots.
6
Juveniles Explore More Than Adults, Faster Approaching Individuals Explore Earlier
In a recent study, a group of researchers has observed four corvid and five parrot species when performing the so-called touch screen discrimination task (O’Hara et al. 2017). In the task, the birds were confronted with a touch screen computer presenting rewarded and unrewarded stimuli to them. The unrewarded stimuli were replaced by novel ones in colour and shape in two of 16 trials in each session, performed over 16 sessions. The behavioural responses of birds were tested when confronted with new situations, while the responses in birds are usually determined by fundamental predispositions (Greenberg and Mettke-Hofmann 2001). One of those is the propensity for exploration that is defined as an activity that allows to gain information but at the same time does not satisfy a current physiological need (Winkler and Leisler 1999). Where exploration is motivated by novelty, the researches talk about neophilia (Tebbich et al. 2002); when another predisposition leads to the avoidance of novel stimuli, they talk about neophobia (Barnett 1958). Exploration is controlled by feeding ecology and habitat complexity as key factors that determine levels of exploration, and neophobia is impacted by riskiness of foraging and interspecific competition (Greenberg and Mettke-Hofmann 2001). Thus, individual experience can impact upon functional expression of exploration and neotic style resulting in differences between individuals within a species (Guillette et al. 2009, 2014). Individual rank within dominance hierarchies has been shown to influence approaches to novelty, but depending on the species higher ranking individuals or subordinates may be less neophobic to novel food (Chiarati et al. 2012; Boogert et al. 2006). Individuals raised in enriched environments showed lower levels of neophobia in later life (Fox and Millam 2004; DePasquale et al. 2016). The results of the study show that a neotic style does not impact upon the amount of exploration but rather effects the time at which it takes place. Very fast approaching individuals exhibited most novelty responses in the early trials, but individuals with increased latencies exhibited an exploration peak at the later stages of the task. This means that neophobic individuals do not necessarily explore less, but only so once they have habituated to a situation. The study shows that individuals that are comparably fast in their approach can potentially influence group data of a species. A clear difference in exploration over time can only be observed in juvenile crows. These findings suggest that age rather than species supports this effect.
12
F. Schupp
This means that the researchers found evidence for a shift in pattern of exploration depending on neotic style. Faster approaching individuals in neotic style explore earlier. Age rather than species might have influenced the amount of total exploration, while young animals explore more than adults. Neotic style seemed to be an individual trait rather than a purely species’ specific component. Looking at purchasing tasks, there is a considerable amount of studies that look at the necessity to introduce new suppliers and supplier induced innovation to the buying firm, especially when the markets are getting more turbulent or changed by introduction of new products. In such cases, the buying firm has to look for new solutions; in other words, it should go out to find novel solutions or better offerings. Here, it seems viable to say that younger individuals that are fast approaching the problem in their nature should be the forerunners in such a search. High propensity to be attracted by new things or neophilia is very helpful. Neophobe individuals might not even reach a low level of exploration. So, if innovation is a time-critical component, which it normally is, young and neophile buyers could be asked to go out and explore novel things. Young buyers who are rather neophobe might not be the best choice for time-critical new purchasing fields. Neotic style in the study varied only for one species and seems to be a strong individual component. When trying to understand birds better and comparing them with humans, you might have asked yourself how the human brain is structured in general. Of course, I do not want to extend on anatomic lectures, but the aspect of cognition seems to be interesting for our questions.
7
The Human Brain
Davies et al. (2018) explain the difference between a conventional computer chip and the human brain (Martin-Jung 2018). The first main difference is the pattern of connections. An electric circuit can perform about ten connections; a nerve cell in the human brain can enter 10,000 connections. A common processor has less than 10 billion transistors, while the human brain has more than 80 billion neurons, which translate into more than 1 quadrillion synaptic connections (Markham 2019; Davies 2019). Secondly, information in the human brain can be stored bound to time. Most of the times, the brain though is in idle mode, but once it is needed the brain is creating activity peaks while using its complex connection patterns. In that sense, time represents a dimension of computational work or, in other words, time is an endogenously active dimension. Therefore, timing is an active dimension of work. Thirdly, the brain works with a significantly higher inaccuracy than computer chips. Maybe some information will be transmitted, but some information will not. Despite these factors, the result of the brain work luckily is good. Fourth, the brain is distinguished by its mutability or ability to change. Connections are being established in real time just in the way and when they are needed. For purchasers, this ability to create on the spot is particularly valuable as many situations that
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
13
occur in professional purchasing cannot be predicted. Another important aspect is the time dimension and the timing itself. Connections are subject to timing which means that if the necessary information is available, but not at the right point in time, it might be lost. Inaccuracy is immanent; therefore, trying to be over-precise might not be brain natural. Beyond these already thrilling basic aspects of our brains, the following paragraph targets to expand on information flexibility of our brain, brain cognition, and the extension of cognition into our bodies.
8
Neuroplasticity and Embodied Cognition
‘Humans are impressionable, footballs are not’, states Kranz (2016). He explains that even the most talented soccer player will not be able to impress a football. He can hit it or press it, but after this, the ball will inflate again and will go back to its original shape. The football in that sense is the contrary to plastic. Rather the ball is elastic and will be somehow constant in its form. The human brain instead of in a scientific view is discussed and characterized by its plasticity. One of the metaphors in use is the paradigm of ‘the trace in the snow’ (Spitzer 2003). Spitzer’s example is a Christmas market in wintertime. From a bird’s view on a Christmas market, you can observe a first visitor who is making his way through the snow to the tea sales booth and then to the Christmas tree sales place. A next visitor is coming and uses the same pathway via the tea sales booth but will only go to the Christmas tree sales booth without a visit at the tea sales booth. This visitor, therefore, takes a detour, as the existing pathway through the snow is already well paved. Other visitors use new paths or use old existing ones even when they have to take a little longer way to get to their target. What we can take away from this picture is that frequently used pathways in the event of new snow falling are still visible for a while, whereas only seldomly used routes will disappear. In our brain, this phenomenon is known as ‘If you do not use it, you will lose it’ (Sun 2007). The other way around also works that in case the winter days are getting warm and the snow disappears at least for some days, new paths can be created easily after another snow. The same picture of the Christmas market in snow gives explanation to the so-called small-world-efficiency construct of our brain in which the efficiency of information transfer in our brain is related to the processing of information according to the minimal linkage costs. We know that the brain is not only a hard disc but also can be compared better with the World Wide Web. In the World Wide Web, the importance of a webpage depends on the use case and the frequency it is used at. Against this background, Kranz (2016) points out that computers themselves are not producing the webpages, just like the brain alone does not produce our thoughts. In order to further understand this point, I would like to refer to Levi-Montalcini’s and Angeletti’s (Levi-Montalcini and Angeletti 1968; Aloe
14
F. Schupp
2004) discovery. She found nerve growth factors in adults and observed that nerve ends can be sprouted, nerve links can be conserved, and the repair of links can be supported. It can also be shown that the magnitude of such nerve growth factors depends and can be influenced by the behaviour of a human. Other studies show (Pal et al. 2014; Emanuele et al. 2006) that yoga and the state of being in love will increase the nerve growth factors as well. Beyond this, Gage et al. (1995) discovered cell division even in adult brains. But this seems limited to specific brain regions such as the gyrus dentatus in the hippocampus and the subventricular zone of the lateral wall of the side ventriculum. Also, this form of vitality is supported by the behaviour. Increased cell division can be improved by learning and external, physical movement. Contrary to this, the cell division is reduced by stress, depression, sleeplessness, and ageing (Kempermann et al. 2002; Lepousez et al. 2015). We find plasticity cases on all kinds of levels of the cerebral system, such as the number of synapses, the size and the strength of relations, and even up to the change in brain landscapes. This leads to the overarching thought that we constantly change our brain at the moment when we use it. Or in other words: ‘We never use the same brain twice’ (Kranz 2016). For our topic purchasing, this means that we should always keep moving and never stop learning in order to better understand suppliers, products, and technologies. The human brain will continue to learn and create new links and relations, and by doing so, we will find new solutions to known or unknown problems. Or in other words, if a negotiation cannot be finalized today, maybe it can be finalized tomorrow. Supplier’s that we do not understand right now, we might understand better the day after tomorrow. This time in-between could allow purchasers to increase their options regarding competition, optimization, or for new sourcings. I would also like to encourage all of us to travel to suppliers or in the other direction to our customers. This will as well drive our learning supported by external movement. The ‘I-sphere’ allows us an additional thought: The brain alone cannot be responsible for the memory and remembrance functions. Not limited to this, the complete metabolism–limb system interaction plays a role in cognitive performance in the sense of multi-sensory integration. The findings suggest that a cerebralcentric memory concept should be questioned in its pure conceptual approach. Instead, the so-called embodied cognition or embodiment is more and more researched and discussed. For professional purchasers, this might mean that they should not only travel to their suppliers and customers, but should also touch the parts that they buy, analyze failures of delivered products, visit factories, smell the products, hear the sounds of the purchased products, and test the services that they buy. This will allow buyers to improve and optimize brainpower and at the same time makes use of the entire body to feel the supplier and its performance by embodied cognition. Embodied cognition is a form of memory.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
9
15
Contagious Memories
Memories seem to be unalterable as they would be chiselled in stone. The contrary is the case: Memories live. They change when we share them with others (Rajaram and Pereira-Pasarin 2010; Rajaram 2011; Barber et al. 2014). Rajaram et al. even found that memories can disappear when the one, who shares them with someone other, leaves (Rajaram 2011). Rajaram discovered the mechanism of contagious memory at a couple. One of the partners suffered from dementia, and consequently, also the other partner lost his memories of common items. When a partner or counterpart cannot confirm common memories, both will lose the past. Rajaram is, therefore, studying the social side of memories. She specializes on common memories and studies how groups learn and remember thing. According to Rajaram, many people think that co-working or working together would help the memory. But this is not always the case. The joint work can also harm the memory. Of course, working groups together can memorize more things than an individual can, but at the same time, specific memories of individuals can as well be destroyed, because different humans have different strategies for memorizing. In addition, others would blend own memories from time to time with mistakes which then would enter into the collective memory. This aspect is truly independent from a co-worker if it is based on words or on emotional events. As well, the effect is independent from friendship, partnership, or the age of the humans that work together. But, of course, at the same time, others can refresh own memory items, they can correct mistakes and add details that oneself has not been able to memorize. To prevent ourselves from loosing or blending memory, especially when like in purchasing a group of buyers is negotiating with a group of sellers, I recommend to write down meeting minutes that are shared with all participants. If the meeting minutes are well written and reflect what has been discussed and agreed, memories can be refreshed and will not be subject to inevitable loss when one of the two sides will disappear. In this context, it is also interesting and important in which way the information is written down.
10
Writing by Hand Helps with Memorizing
Writing by hand is a kind of precision work that is most likely even influencing the mind. According to Velay and Longcamp (2012), this aspect is already true in the period when the alphabet is being learned. In their study, Velay and Longcamp (2012) found that children can recognize and distinguish letters better when they write down sequences of letters of the alphabet by hand instead of typing them on a
16
F. Schupp
keyboard. This seems to be a prove that handwritten pieces are saved in a plurimodal way which means that the human brain connects the learned letters with movements of the hand and feelings of how the pen is sliding on the paper. By this, the learning is linked with physical experiences, a kind of physical pony (see also Longcamp et al. 2016; Longcamp et al. 2005). Medwell and Wray (Medwell and Wray 2017; see also Medwell and Wray 2014) argue in the same direction that physical movements that are resulting out of handwriting are part of the thought process. James and Engelhardt (2012) report in addition that brain areas that are activated during handwriting are not activated when typing. In the business context, I frequently observe people who write down notes in their small books. Those people will be able to memorize better over people who took notes via their keyboard. Another situation that many of you might have experienced is that in a meeting, someone goes to a whiteboard to take notes or even to lead the discussion by writing down words and numbers. This person will memorize best what has been said in the meeting. One more incentive to lead a meeting from the whiteboard position. It requires only a small step from memory and memorizing to the span of attention.
11
Mobile Phones Reduce the Span of Attention
A very interesting study analyzing the span of attention is called ‘Jugend (youth), Information, (Multi-) Media’. This study was published in the year 2017 for the twentieth time. The study shows that the usage of media has increased again compared to previous years and corresponding effects are more stress, lower conflict capability, and deficits in social behaviour. As one example, in Germany, 95% of the teenagers aged from 12 to 19 regularly use ‘WhatsApp’. Lembke (2016, 2019) argues that digital communication creates an overflow of stimuli. It forces the users towards multi-tasking. One result of that is the reduction of the attention span, which was found to be reduced from the year 2000 to the year 2013 by one-third. In addition, according to Lembke (2016) and Feierabend et al. (2017), digital communication represses social communication more and more. The effect is a rather narcissistic and egoistic communication and a lack of compassionate behaviour and conflict capability (Rother 2016). Teenagers receive more than 3000 messages per month (Feierabend et al. 2017). If we project these learnings into the modern purchasing world, we can assume that also here the broad usage of smartphones and messaging is present and predominant. When it comes to negotiations, project discussions or sourcing decisions, which are the decisive moments in purchasing, buyers therefore might want to increase their attention span and leave the mobile phones out of the negotiation room. A lack of compassionate behaviour might also harm the understanding for the supplier and result in a lower conflict capability finally leading to harder
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
17
decisions. On the other hand, a buyer might be able to use a low span of attention of the supplier for his interests. But, in the long run, such a win could also come back as a loss when it was identified as problematic by the supplier. So, please leave modern communication out of the negotiation room.
12
Incomplete Tasks are the Ones We Remember the Best
The topic of incomplete tasks goes back to a for me highly relevant work and publication by Zeigarnik in (1927). I was confronted with the work by a small article in the Business Live Journal of British Airways excerpting a book of Martin et al. (2016, 2014), who is mentioning Zeigarnik. The work of Zeigarnik is about memorizing completed and in-completed tasks. Zeigarnik’s attention to the topic was taken during a restaurant visit together with research fellows including her mentor Kurt Lewin. The reported story is that a waiter was extremely good in memorizing orders from a large number of dining customers. The waiter was so impressive that he did not make mistakes neither for food nor for drink orders without noting them down. Zeigarnik and fellows tested the waiter by covering their plates and glasses with napkins after the waiter’s delivery and asked him to recall what they have ordered. The result was that he was not able to remember the food or drink orders. The explaining effect was later tested by Zeigarnik and entered social psychology literature as the ‘Zeigarnik effect’. According to Zeigarnik (1927), in-completed tasks are being memorized better than completed ones, concretely even almost twice as good as completed tasks. In her and her research fellows’ tests, the decisive element was not found in the feeling about or the intensity of the task, nor in the shock effect in the moment of in-completion of the task, but in existence of a quasi need that was created by pursuing or during execution of the task. When the test persons were asked about the tasks, this quasi need is revisited. Such quasi need equals to a tension that is pointing in the same direction as the target of the task or the intended direction for the completion of the task and also exists during reproduction of the task. The directional element by the way is founded in the field theory of Lewin developed during the 1920s (Lewin 1931; Lück 1996), elaborating on the transfer from the Aristotelic to the Galileic thinking when explaining biology and psychology. Here, especially relevant is the treatment of dynamic problems to be seen as developing situations that are influenced and impacted by the overall scenario in which the problem is embedded at a certain point in time. Influencing actions or elements are described by vectors and mathematical means and can pull or push a task in different directions within a given framework. In my view, their work is relevant for negotiation tasks in purchasing as those are as well scenario-, context-, and moment-dependent.
18
F. Schupp
Coming back to Zeigarnik, the quasi need coming to the surface when reproducing the task depends on the intensity and the structure of the tension, as well as on the strength and type of will for reproduction that develops in the moment of revisiting. Whereas the will for reproduction can be stronger than the quasi need itself, while pointing in the same direction. This is the case when a test person is treating the mental revisiting of the task as a separate memorizing task. It is not the case, when a test person only reports or talks about the tasks. Decisive about the continuation of the quasi need is not the externally visible completion or in-completion of the task, but it is the internal or inner in-completion of the task. Completed tasks, in which the test person was not satisfied with its own performance or tasks that had different possibilities for a solution, could also be memorized well. The same is true for interesting tasks in the perception of the test person. Similar to in-completed tasks, externally not-completed actions, of which the feeling for need of completion is gone, are not well memorized. In cases where behind the quasi need expressive and real needs are present when the central I-sphere of the human is touched, the need-like tensions are stronger. For ambitious people, the in-completed tasks that are strongly touching the persons ambitions are memorized well. The difference between completed and interrupted tasks is greater for end-point-oriented tasks than for continuous tasks. This is related to what extent those task structures lead to the development of independent tension systems. If the single actions do not have their own identity, the whole test is seen as one-single tension system. For example, if test persons were informed at the beginning of the test about all elements of the tasks or if the tasks were seen as minor actions, then no outweighing of in-completed tasks was present. For the development of tension systems, a sufficient strength of the surrounding dynamic field is necessary. If the psychical field gets too liquid, e.g. during getting tired, or when big pressure changes occur, e.g. during excitement or nervousness, the creation of tensions will not happen. Already existing tension systems can be dissolved by changes in situation, e.g. through jogging or by entering into different situations. A similar aspect is explained by Britta Heidemann in her interview in this book. The strength in which such need-related tensions are created or maintained seems to be individually different and for each individual in a high-degree constant. The more the needs of the respective human are unbroken, the less it can renounce the satisfaction of the need; the more childish, naïve, and natural the person is during the action, the stronger is the overweighing of the in-completed tasks. For purchasing, the Zeigarnik effect is particularly interesting. As already mentioned a few times, in my opinion, one of the most important purchasing tasks is the negotiation. Now, if a negotiation is kicked-off, has a repeatedly mentioned target, and is embedded in an overarching tension, the negotiation can be continued until the target is reached. The suppliers and of course also the buyers will remember the incomplete task, and depending on the will for reproduction, the task
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
19
can be revisited many times. On the other hand, a completed negotiation will be forgotten in content and result. So, it might not be a fault of the customer that he cannot remember negotiation results. Forgetting them rather means that their target was reached. In cases where buyers remember negotiation results, the negotiations most likely have not reached the buyer’s targets and will come back on the negotiation table. Taking into consideration the positive effects of tension and a tension system, it might be as well beneficial to limit negotiations to a specific and ending period of time in the year. This allows to forget when the tension system is gone and gives room for other important tasks of purchasing which is the supply management aspect including strategy, performance refinement, and innovation. A striking way of pure task orientation including a very visible symbol of target completion or tension system relief was found with the Amazonian tribe of the Amondawa.
13
Task Orientation to Avoid Meeting Minutes at All
The Amazonian tribe Amondawa lives without calendar and time (Braun 2011). Time does not play a significant role in their daily life. The Amondawa does not even have a word for time nor do they have one for week, month, or year. Consequently, they cannot tell you their own age in years. The life of the Amondawa takes place in a solitary region of the rain forest in Brazil and is oriented at the way of the sun (Braun 2011). The sun determines the daily rhythm and also splits the year in half as scientists around (Sinha 2011) from Portsmouth University found out. When the sun is shining, for the Amondawa, the dry season is meant, in their language ‘Kuaripe’ or ‘in the sun’. When it rains and for some months it is the rainy season, they call it ‘Amana’, their word for rain. Their day is split into two halves as well. During daytime, it is ‘Ara’ or sunshine. There is no concept of morning or afternoon. No meeting time or punctuality is conceptualized, only tasks have to be completed. The male members of the tribe have to work on the fields for grain or manioc. What the Amondawa harvests, they eat or sell on the market. The concept of storing is not present. Their life is lived now and here. There is no planning for the future, not even the seeds for the next year are stored. Once the work is done, the sunsets and for the Amondawa starts the night, or the black (Braun 2011). The scientists discovered that there is no abstract concept of time present in that culture. Even numbers do not seem to exist in a complex way. The numbers one ‘pèi’ and two ‘monkoi’ can be combined to 3 and 4. Age can therefore not be fully expressed in years. Instead, Amondawa gets new names. When a member gets a new task, he or she gets a new name. Maybe a recommendation with a smile on my face could be to avoid meeting minutes at all, to complete the purchasing and supply management tasks, and once we have finished our specific tasks, we get a new name. Of course, a less philosophic hint could be to take a more stringent task orientation in purchasing and
20
F. Schupp
supply management not to be constantly overwhelmed by many open items. I observe especially in purchasing departments that are tasked with purchasing work in a broader sense including negotiation and sourcing, supplier quality management, supply management, and technological supplier development that many open items might bring the individual buyer to a quantity limit of bearable tasks. For this reason, it might be beneficial to split the year into seasons with specific task focus in each season, such as strategy development in wintertime or annual negotiations in autumn. This way would allow a natural structure and higher task orientation. Within this approach, Steve Jobs (Isaacson 2011) recommended to limit parallel tasks to maximum of three or four in order to ensure efficiency and consistent task orientation throughout the whole organization. In my experience, this approach can create commitment and reduce distraction from targets. After having focused on human behaviour and human cultures, I want to go back to animals for further understanding and analysis.
14
How the Wolf Hunts
In my view, a very interesting animal is the wolf. The wolf is intelligent and unfortunately more and more endangered. In this regard, I would like to point out on wolf research or conservation centres that do not only try to better understand the wolf but also want to protect the species. One of those research centres is the Wolf Conservation Centre in South Salem, New York, founded by Grimaud (2013). I recommend at least for a visit on the Internet. A few researchers investigate the wolf’s life. Ahne (2017) has brought together a few of the findings of Mech (1999) and Zimen (2003), selected and explained many of the wolf’s traits of which I would like to focus on a few. By supervision from the air, the hunting behaviour of the wolf can be analyzed. Regarding this hunting behaviour, researchers found always the same pattern: First the search, then the pursuit, the encounter with the prey, and lastly the hunt itself. When the wolves have detected their prey by a highly developed sense of smelling and hearing, they try to get closer to the prey without being discovered. At a certain point, the prey realizes its haunters. The prey either starts to run or it does not. The latter interestingly increases its chances for survival. Ungulates, the most frequent prey of wolves, are well prepared for an attack. If the animal stands still with the intention to defend itself instead of running away, the wolves start to calculate a quick cost–benefit analysis: A successful attack will provide food for several days. On the other hand, to get hit by a foot of a defending moose would mean severe injuries. Contrary to his reputation, the wolf is not a merciless hunter but a clever tactician. Most of the hunts are being stopped. The one who runs is vulnerable. Therefore, the pack tries to make the prey run. If the wolves are successful in this regard, usually a relatively short sprint is taking place, in which the wolves use their only real physical weapon: Their teeth. Their
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
21
teeth and their jaw withstand enormous weights, e.g. when a wolf bites in the foot of a moose and is being dragged along for several metres. Other than lions or tigers, wolves do not kill their prey with one precise bite. Instead the prey dies as a consequence of several wounds that are mainly caused by the wolves’ fangs. This is particularly the case when the prey is big. Of course, it is maybe difficult to compare the hunt of the wolves with typical situations in purchasing. But minimum a negotiation can carry elements of a hunt. Many buyers know that if the potential suppliers do not move at all, they are less vulnerable towards price reductions or other concessions to the buyer. In such cases, buyers start a quick cost–benefit analysis and decide about the potential return of a dangerous negotiation. However, when the buyer can make the supplier run, usually as an effect of competition, prices drop and the position of the buyer to reach his targets improves. Like in the wolf, the buyer only has limited real influencing possibilities, but once he is on the supplier, the supplier might have a difficult time. So, think about taking the effort to invest in competition and allow suppliers to move. In my time as a buyer, I have also experienced, and this in both ways that a supplier can be attacked by many buyers for a supposed weakness and as indicated also the other way around. Supposedly, good suppliers have been approached by many buyers of the same organization and of different organizations ending up with too many projects at the same time struggling for survival. This aspect brings me directly to the question if buyers should negotiate together or alone.
15
The Young Wolf
Looking at the wolf in this regard, we can observe that the wolf hunts in groups. Why wolves hunt together seemed to be clear for a long time: More hunters, more prey, so was the believe. But this perception is actually wrong (Zimen 2003). Also, a single lonesome wolf is able to kill a moose or a deer. And, a wolf couple does not kill less prey than a wolf pack. In fact, the larger the size of the pack, the lesser food remains for each individual wolf. Consequently, a widely discussed question in science about the wolf is what is the reason that a young wolf does not simply leave the pack after seven to twelve months when he or she is grown up. Instead, the young wolf stays two, three, or even four years with its family (Zimen 2003). The reason for this behaviour according to Ahne (2017) is a family political decision. In cases where big prey is present, which is the preferred food of the wolf, there is also enough food for the offspring. The food that would normally rest for scavengers is given to young wolves. The fact that there is a correlation between availability of food and the size of the pack is shown in regions where food is a scarce resource for wolves. In Italy during the 1970s for example, where there were only a few games such as red dear present, or in Israel where wolves ate small
22
F. Schupp
animals and litter, packs frequently consisted of only one couple and the young wolves left their parents early (Ahne 2017; Zimen 2003). Instead, the probability that the invest in the next generations pays off increases when the young wolves participate in joint hunt and get their food out of it, respectively. For the young wolves, this way is beneficial as well, as staying with their parents protects them until the time when the mating instinct and the rather risky search for an own partner and territory will lead them away from their parents. An extended family will take care of the young wolves via uncles and aunts to protect the next generation (Zimen 2003). This group aspect might explain why young buyers stay with groups of buyers and learn from and with the elder ones how to negotiate and how to buy. If the available food is big enough, the young buyers stay with the pack, but at a certain time, they leave and try to create their own family and life. I have seen many young buyers leaving. And, some even came back, when their new venture did not give them enough to eat and the old pack offered bigger chances for bigger negotiations. But most of the young buyers who have left the pack, I did not see coming back. You cannot and should not try to stop them from leaving. It is a natural process same as when children once they are grown up leave the house of their parents. The young buyers go out to create their own adventure and step further into the business-to-business jungle.
16
An Empty Stomach Influences the Behaviour
Going deeper into Purchasing Jumanji, I want to look at the aspect of being hungry. In this regard, zebrafish are very interesting as their larvae when they are hungry pursue larger prey, that they normally would not hunt for. Filosa et al. (2016) created computer-animated circles that passed through the field of sight of zebrafish larvae. Fed larvae did only follow small circles as potential prey, while dropping large circles. This is due to the fact that the larger circles could also represent an enemy that could be dangerous for themselves. Zebrafish larvae with an empty stomach however took a higher risk and followed larger circles. On top of the direct findings, Filosa et al. (2016) assume that hungry larvae can also see potential prey better as compared to fed ones. This is induced by the finding that the brain areas that are responsible for seeing have been more active with hungry animals than with saturated ones. I clearly observed such behaviour in professional purchasing as well. When a buying organization really is hungry for savings or urgently needs a new or even unknown technology or good, this buying organization is trying to work with too big suppliers. At the end of the day, the buying organization cannot digest the bigger supplier, either as it is too inflexible or too clever for the buyer. If the zebrafish larvae finally can digest, too large prey is not exactly reported in the research of Filosa et al. (2016), but the change from escape to approach in that case suggests a certain success rate (Filosa et al. 2016; Bednekoff 2007). In nature, the
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
23
big dots in the test are predators and thus potentially dangerous for the zebrafish larvae, but they seem to have a threshold value in size, whereas too big dots seem to be too large to potentially represent food (Semmelhack et al. 2014). We can already see that our brain is playing games with us and our behaviour might be somehow irrational. To further complicate the topic, I want to introduce the influence of language.
17
Framing
Clearly, modern neuro- or cognitive research is challenging classic reasoning. I guess you might have felt this already when having read the first paragraphs of this article. According to the work of Elisabeth Wehling (2016), the basis for our decisions is not facts, but the cognitive interpretive framework that we have. In science, this interpretive area is called a frame. Frames are activated in our brain by language and these frames decide about how we understand facts that are communicated to us. An interesting encounter in this context would be if Immanuel Kant and Elisabeth Wehling could meet. Kant in his ‘Critik der reinen Vernunft’ (Kant 1787) would argue that sense or sensuality and reason or comprehension are the only and equally important and from each other independent sources for the development of realization, new knowledge, or cognition. Wehling (2016) would argue that frames activated by specific language and experience define cognitive boundaries in which the decisions are being made. The discussion would probably go deeper into the question to what extend sensuality is misled by language and frames. But the consequence of the phenomenon as such might not be in dispute. For those of you who are interested in Kant and his ‘Epistemology’ (Erkenntnistheorie) might also want to have a look into Reiniger (1923), who develops Kant and his work out of the context of previous and contradicting philosophies to Kant. Reininger also explains Kant’s philosophy of nature, ethics, and the question of what is an art. This aspect adds to the discussion of Britta Heidemann when comparing fencing with the art of surgery and business negotiations. According to Kant natural beauty is set as the highest point. While beautiful nature looks like it would be beautiful art, so should beautiful art give the impression as it would be beautiful nature. This means that it must not relieve the intentional aspect of its creation. Despite being itself a piece of freedom, a product of fine art must be free of the constraint of arbitrary rules, just like it was produced by nature itself. And, this will particularly be the case when the artist carries the rule that he uses to create inside himself. Let us look closer into framing. Frames are activated by language and decide in which direction we think. One example is the word ‘tax’ or ‘taxes’. In this context, we sometimes speak about the burden of taxes which already open the frame that something is pushing on our shoulders (Wehling 2016). By nature, this feeling is
24
F. Schupp
inconvenient for us humans and leads to a counter-action. Trapped inside this frame we start to fight against the one who is pushing us on our shoulders. We also think in our language that opens other kinds of frames. One example would be that in German we say in a literal translation ‘You cannot carry someone to the hunt’. The corresponding English expression would be ‘You can bring the horse to the pond, but you cannot make it drink’. Both expressions are supposed to mean the same thing, but they open different frames in our brains. The German expression creates a frame of aggressiveness or offence—the situation of hunting an animal. The English expression is more peaceful or goes into the direction of stubbornness. Using those expressions in negotiations can lead to different roads of thinking in the brain of the respective negotiator. Humans are rational creatures. They can decide by rationality or faculty of reason. If you put relevant facts on the table (another frame), humans can objectively weigh them against each other and decide for the best solution. This is the way we have learned to think about ourselves, but neuro- and cognitive science show that not the facts for themselves are decisive, but also our conceptual or mental frame of interpretation, in brief the frame. Frames are the elements that give the facts a meaning and this in a way that they sort and file information relative to our physical experience and to our memorized knowledge about the world. This knowledge by the way can already be a result of other frames. Frames are always selective. They emphasize specific facts or realities and let others ‘drop under the table’ (another German frame). Therefore, frames are evaluating and interpreting. And once they are activated in our brain by the means of language, frames guide our thinking and action or behaviour. And, this without us realizing or knowing that this happens by frames. One frame that Luther has created is ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive’. (Luther 1545). This old frame guides us to give the customer what he needs and at the same time puts the buyer into a perspective of robbing or stealing that by the way does not fit to the exact same expression. This means depending on one’s experience, a sentence can open up different frames. Kant would love this discussion. By the way, for those of you who have kids, kids create artificial frames all the time. And adults follow directions or dead ends within or out of frames. Having understood this concept (avoiding the framing word construct, that is often misleading scientists), Wehling steps ahead towards embodied cognition (see also Barsalou 2008, 2009; or Wehlings research fellow Lakoff in Lakoff and Johnson 1999; Niedenthal et al. 2005). This aspect has already been touched upon while explaining about our brain structure earlier in this article. If you read the word ‘hammer’ and you are asked, ‘What do you think now?’, you would probably have several associations such as tools, hammering, hitting the nail on the head or if you have recently visited the Oktoberfest in Munich, Germany, you might think about the popular game ‘Hau den Lukas’ which is the attraction where you hit a knob by a large hammer and try to catapult a small weight up a scale. The stronger you are, … Or, you imagine a blue thumb. Having set this frame, Rueschemeyer et al. (2010) show that our brain is automatically planning a body movement when hearing the word hammer. The premotor cortex centre of our brain is designing and also preparing the movements.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
25
This simulation of movement is also set in context with our experience with corresponding objects. In other words, our brain wants to train over and over again until it reaches the targeted movement to be the future context when activated. Understanding this aspect, the sentence ‘Uwe kicks the ball’ already activates your leg or ‘John bits in the apple’ already creates movement of our jaws. We therefore understand the meaning of an activity word by simulation of connected actions in our brain (Hauk and Pulvermüller 2004; Tettamanti et al. 2005; Desai et al. 2010). Similar to movements, our brain also simulates saved or memorized knowledge like feelings, haptic experience, tactile sense, odours, or flavours. If you read the word salt, the brain activates those body areas that are responsible for sensing flavours (Barros-Loscertales et al. 2012). And consequently, also the cognitive understanding of noises is simulated by a tong movement that would go along with the production of such noise. In other words, we understand what someone says by ourselves going through the motions (Fadiga et al. 2002), always in the context of our previous experiences. Cognitive simulation can be problematic when it is contradictory to, e.g. its real movement. For example, Wehling states, ‘would you read the word “pull” on a door, but you needed to push to open it, your brain would prepare the pull movement, but would get immediately trapped in a motoric decision conflict only because of the linguistic coupling to our senses wishing to pull and on the other hand having to push to get through the door’. Giving is better than taking. If you ask your supplier to give, he will already prepare himself in his premotor cortex to give. Beyond the embodied cognition itself lies the simulation of language as such. This process is automatically happening when we compile language. For example, where we look at when we read or hear sentences that describe loci. An experiment analyzed a situation when a test person was to hear two different sentences while looking out of the window to a high multistory building. The test person heard ‘The man in the fifth story is ironing his shirts’ and then ‘The man in the ground floor is ironing his shirts’. While nobody who in fact is ironing was visible, the test person automatically looked at the fifth floor while hearing the first sentence and to the ground floor when the second sentence was played. Why? In order to understand the words, our brain simulates the implicit location (Spivey and Geng 2001). This means that experienced buyers locate the source of cost improvements in the production plant of the supplier and by this expression explicitly point the suppliers to an implicit location. Thirdly, when we try to understand sentences that contain visual information, our brain does not simulate the movement, but pictures and perspectives in our visual cortex. Wehling (2016) suggests reading the following two sentences: ‘The bird is in the sky’. ‘The bird is on the ground’.
26
F. Schupp
Both sentences do not contain words that indicate movement as ‘is’ is has static meaning. Instead, our brain develops visual scenes in which the subject takes a supervisory role. The brain calculates what it would mean to see a bird in the sky or on the ground. The brain simulates as if the supervisor would in fact be in the real situation and observing from the respective perspective. This process gives the sense to the words that we hear. Now, if Wehling would have shown us two pictures while listening to the first sentence, one picture with a bird flying in the sky with the wings widespread and one picture with the bird sitting on the ground and wings attached, we would have recognized the bird on the first picture much quicker than on the second one. The test is equally valid for the second sentence (Zwaan et al. 2002; Zwaan and Pecher 2012). In this example, we understand again that we simulate linguistic information to be able to understand it, and in addition to that, simulation has also an effect on our perception or speed of cognition. Not limited to the above, we do not only simulate single concepts, but also several concepts when we read or hear words. This means that behind each word or sentence, there is more meaning hidden immanently than we think. The reason for this evermore presence of a greater meaning of single words or sentences is the content and structure of the frames that are opened. This so-called frame semantics is derived from our individual experiences in the world. Included here are physical experiences such as movements, space, time, and emotions, but also experiences with language and culture. We can understand this in the bird example as well. When we heard the sentence ‘The bird is in the sky’, we did not read the bird with its wings widespread in the sky. Still, we identified the bird with the wings spread faster. This is the case because, in our natural experience, we connect birds that have the ability to fly with wings because they need and have wings to fly. Birds with wings attached in that sense are not birds, because we expect birds to fly. All this information has not been transported by the words in the sentence that you read, but through the frames that you opened up in your brain. By the way, this can lead to the impression that humans sometimes think or even swear that they have heard or read ideas related to one specific word, while not explicitly having heard or read the ideas. They only have been triggered by frames embedded in experiences by words. Matlock (2004) has shown that the simulation of slowness and speed has a direct influence of how quickly test persons understood a sentence that contained a fictive movement. For buyers, this can also be an important aspect. If a buyer can simulate how easy one can move through a defined terrain, either by a movie about Formula-E cars or by listening to sentences that describe easy and effective navigation across an island by car through a city by e-bike, the respective supplier will understand quicker when a fictive movement is presented to him, such as catching up to the speed of the customer. This means frames have an influence on the language processing speed. Frames also have an influence on our perception of the world.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
27
Aarts and Dijksterhuis (2002) asked probands to read a text that contained the words turtle or cheetah. Afterwards, they were asked to estimate the walking speed of a man on a picture. The people who read about the turtle have estimated the speed of the man as much slower than the cheetah group. Nota bene, the words slow or fast have not been in the text, i.e. the persons associated a certain speed with each animal and transferred this knowledge into the man. Frames therefore lead to the phenomenon that single words can activate a single concept that changes our perception of the world. Srull and Wyer (1979) have made a highly relevant study also for purchasers or suppliers in this context. They asked test persons to read a list of words that belong to the field of sensitivity or considerate behaviour and others read about asperity or brusqueness. Afterwards, each group had to estimate the social behaviour of test persons on pictures shown to them. The pictures were of course the same, but probands that have read about considerate behaviour estimated the persons on the pictures as being gentle, generous, and friendly. The other group estimated the people being unfriendly, rude. As the visible or external characteristics of the people on the pictures were the same, it was the frame that was activated by language beforehand that lead to the evaluation of the persons on the pictures. This is especially relevant for supplier reputation in both directions. By language, the research and development function, the purchasing function inside the customer, the management group of the supplier, the supplier as a whole, the customer as a whole can be changed in perception based on previously used language, such as modern, innovative, technology-oriented, future-oriented, speedy, aggressive, cost killing, consistent, rule-based, reactive, fast, smart, clever, etc. Please, try to combine a few departments of your organization with different attributes, repeat them in front of others, and test the directional (re-)orientation in the perception of your target group when working with the selected departments. And now the most important aspect of framing: When frames are already activated in our heads, then the dictate with which simplicity and easiness information is absorbed by us. Indeed, it is true that the brain can calculate facts best when those facts fit into frames that are already activated by language. Another way around, if a specific interpretive frame is already activated and when we are confronted with information that does not fit into this frame, then our brain reacts in a stubborn way. It rejects to accept diverting information as being part of reality. An interesting test in this regard and especially also for the context of purchasing and good or bad suppliers is the study by Yaxley and Zwaan (2007). Participants were asked to read ‘The skier did barely see the elk through his blurred goggles’. The other group had to read ‘The skier saw the elk clearly through his clean goggles’. Afterwards, a picture of an elk was shown to the participants, whereas one elk was only fuzzily visible, and on another picture, the elk was clearly visible. Objectively, the human should be able to recognize the clearly visible elk in a better way. But, as you can already guess, those participants who previously read about the blurry goggles did realize the only fuzzily visible elk significantly faster than the others. The ones with the clean goggles saw the clearly visible elk faster. What has happened?
28
F. Schupp
The prereading of the text leads to the stimulus of good or bad sight. In their brain, an interpretive frame was activated that would integrate the then following facts. When fact and frame matched, the information quickly made sense. Was there a contradiction between fact and frame, the understanding of the information was lagging and this independently which one of the information was objectively easier available. Many of us purchasers know this problem. Independently of objective criteria and facts: If the wrong frame is activated, the corresponding information is absorbed, the other one is not. Historically bad quality suppliers, that are performing well in the recent past or current period, can be seen as bad today, especially also if they only make one mistake even after a long period of no mistakes. Vice versa, suppliers that are supposed to be clearly good, honest, effective, and efficient, but objectively are not, might quickly be seen as positive after one good move. Frames decide with which easiness we understand facts and information, independent how objectively good or bad the facts are available or accessible. The bad supplier can be clearly seen behind the blur. A good supplier cannot be seen in a clear picture. In reality, there are no objectively easier accessible facts as soon as frames come into play. There are only such facts that fit well into a frame and others that do not fit well or do not fit at all into a frame. Beyond what was already said, another phenomenon is that when the concept of slowness is activated in our brain, we also move our body slower (Bargh et al. 1996). Just to remember, our brain is learning frames by experience in a way that phenomena either correlate with the real world or that different aspects are being set into context by culture or language. Two studies were analyzing the effect of using the expression to look into the future or to look back, while experiencing in life that moving forward and time usually point in the same direction. People sometimes walk backwards and time advances, but most of the time people advance while time also advances. So, the frames ‘the future lies in front of us’ and ‘the past lies behind us’ directly impact our actions. Miles et al. (2010) found that when we talk about the past, physically we lean back, when we talk about tomorrow, we tend to lean forward. Language directly influences how we act in the world and how we interact with other people. Again, two groups were given a task. The first one was reading a text stating words like respect, sensitive, and polite. Others read aggressive, unfriendly, and impolite. After reading the text, the probands had to shortly discuss a small topic with research leader. This research leader purposely was talking to someone else in that moment. So, the probands had to wait or act by interruption. The result of the test was that the second group entered in a rude way into the talk of the researcher with his discussion partner. The members of this group interrupted the talk and tried to get the attention of the research leader. The members of the first group however were passive and waited for a longer time until they politely asked for interruption (Bargh et al. 1996). In a nutshell, we can see that we all think and act according to words. The language that we hear or read activates frames in our head. A part of these frames is always also the cognitive simulation of things that we normally do not associate
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
29
with language, such as emotions, movements, smells, sounds, pictures, and so on. Because each and every word activates frames, with every word we are communicating a multitude of ideas that are connected with our experience in the world around this word. Frames take influence on our cognition and can heavily influence the easiness how we realize facts and information. Only when a fact fits into an activated frame, this fact will enter without problems in our consciousness. And, language takes direct influence in our actions by activated frames. One small example could be a negotiation. In a negotiation, the buyer could think about avoiding the expression cost savings in favour of cost reductions. Savings could trigger the frame to bring money to the own bank account and to save. With this frame being activated, a supplier would most likely not give money to the buying company, but to try to save money instead. Also, the word cost might be interpreted as a burden by the supplier and lead him to a path of suppression and not to concession. Price instead might have a positive connotation as the frame ‘value for price’ could be opened at the supplier. So, price reductions would potentially be the better expression in favour of the buyer when discussing to get a lower price in the next period for a good that was purchased before. Leaving humans for a moment, we want to go back to animals.
18
The Farming Fish
The one who wants to harvest a lot of crop has to take care of his land. This is also true, when the respective claim is located under water. How this works can be studied with some farming damselfish (Parma alboscapularis) that one could also call farming fish. These animals nourish themselves by harvesting and eating algae surfaces on riffs. But the fish do not eat somewhere unspecific; they concentrate on their geographic claim. They care for their claim and clean it from undesired plants, defend their claim against intruders, and fertilize their claim with own excreta. The scientists around Ferreira (Ferreira et al. 2018) from the University of South Australia in Adelaide have even reported that the fish adjust their efforts and work following the CO2 concentration of the water. The higher the CO2 concentration, the faster the algae will grow and the more intensive the fish care about the cleaning of the weed. Because in such circumstances, there is more food available, and the animals get along with a smaller claim. By this, the population can grow with higher CO2 content. I report about this fish, as I truly believe a buying company cannot harvest price reductions or in a broader view the fruits of competitiveness when they do not take care about their suppliers. Buyers have to work with suppliers, seed, fertilize, clean and defend intruders before they can harvest good crop. The better the outer circumstances, the easier it is to work with lesser number of suppliers. This aspect brings us directly to the question of competition in nature.
30
19
F. Schupp
Local Competition in Nature
Recently, I have read the new book of Gerd Ganteför (Ganteför 2018), who analyzes collective phenomena in nature and discusses potential consequences for communication and human behaviour in a herd. In this instance, I came across many interesting phenomena, but one of them caught my specific attention. Already for a long time, I am surprised why purchasers are buying ‘around the church clock tower of their village’, how I usually tell it to my colleagues. My observation is that many companies primarily buy regionally or even locally. This not by strategy, but by chance or better: By nature. Ganteför found a few annotations for this behaviour in the competitive world of animals. In this context, I would like to introduce two animals to you, the firefly (here Pteroptyx malaccae, as well Photinus carolinus, Macrolampis palaciosi) and the bush cricket or katydid (here the Mecopoda elongate). Both of them emit light or sound to attract conspecific mates and to keep away predators at the same time. Like in most of the species, the male is flashing or singing, and the female is being attracted and chooses. A well-cited publication in this context analyzes the rhythm of male Pteroptyx malaccae fireflies, congregated in trees, flashing in rhythmic synchrony with a period of about 560 ± 6 ms. The study analyzes if the rhythm of the flies is inherent to each animal or if the flashes are a reaction to the others. The result is that the synchrony is regulated by central nervous feedback from preceding activity cycles as also seen in the human sense of rhythm as well (Buck and Buck 1968). At the same time, the range of flash coincidence is of the order of ±20 ms. This means that there is a certain time delta between the flashes of each individual, but also a fair amount of synchrony (Buck and Buck 1978; Moiseff and Copeland 2010). Based on this knowledge, in fact that the sound or light to attract mates is produced intrinsically, and in competition with each other, we can look at the following study of Mecopoda elongate. Hartbauer and Römer (2016) give an overview on studies that research chorus synchrony in this tropical katydid Mecopoda elongata. They do not analyze the flash light, but the mating sound produced by katydids. A special focus is given to the question why some males persistently signal as followers although this reduces their mating success. If we assume that finding the right supplier for a specific good that the buyer needs also represents a form of mating, I wanted to look at the results of the above research. The results are extremely interesting for purchasers. First, in the observation of Hartbauer and Römer (2016), females prefer males that signal at a period of 2 s. This is the conspecific requirement of Mecopoda elongata and individual to each species. It forces the males to get as close as possible to such rhythm, otherwise female will not be attracted. Females also prefer leading signals in fact they prefer the leaders, which is why males in a group compete for the leader role (Hartbauer et al. 2014). Chorus synchrony is a by-product of this behaviour. The synchrony is not perfect
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
31
and also interesting is that the leader–follower roles remain stable for a long time. One explanation for remaining a follower is also that those katydids who follow have less chance to become a victim to parasitoid flies, as those seem to focus first on the leaders. At the same time of course, the followers go into a disadvantage of reproduction success. On the other hand, it is also beneficial for the followers to establish a group and following the leader in a group, because such a group can ‘extend the acoustic space’. Herein, consistent leader males increase their signal rate in choruses by 4% on average compared to when they sing in isolation. This means that competition increases in a group situation. This, the so-called beacon effect on top of it, attracts more female, as females prefer group situations where the can choose from instead of following a lone single male who is comparably quieter. By grouping, males increase their own mating chances and the mating chances of the group. Consequently, simulations have shown that the per capita chance to meet a date mate increases if the katydids sing in a chorus. Therefore, sexual selection favours group displays, and follower roles are evolutionary stabilized out of this emerging positive group effect and the negative natural selection. For the professional purchasers, this can mean many things. One very important aspect is to bring suppliers into a true competition situation which results in an increased signal rate of the leading supplier and an increased competition out of the beacon effect. At the same time, natural selection is happening as not all suppliers are good enough to follow the leader and to really enter the group. The result is an enhanced level of competition. This can be achieved and used best in an auction which is described in one chapter of this book by ZEW—Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research. As one argument that purchasers could use to bring suppliers into an auction, the aspect could hold that those suppliers who rightfully enter the auction are fitter than the ones that do not. Beginning a little bit earlier in the process, in my experience, the buyers sometimes do not ask loud enough for a bid. Or putting it in another way, the buyer does not actively go out to search for mates. Buyers think that the chorus should come to them. This is obviously not happening for the complete chorus. So, the buying company represented by the buyer has to work on its attractiveness to signal that a partner is wanted. Once this is done, the suppliers should be brought in a chorus situation. Coming back to the phenomenon of buying around the church in your own village. Mate dating seems to be relatively regional. Suppliers in the specific area compete for their customers. But it can happen that the mates available in the area are not best for a successful reproduction. Therefore, it can make sense for buyers to move to other geographies and to try to find better partners. For sellers, it can also make sense to leave, either to find better customers or to become a leader in case they have been followers for a long time with no chance to overtake the leader. Also, the question of the right rhythm is important. For example, if we compare the automotive industry with the agriculture industry, the rhythm of both industries might be different. If this is the case, automotive buyers should try to find only automotive rhythm suppliers. If this such condition not given, meaning the offset of sound or light emitted by the suppliers is too big and therefore not conspecifically suitable, the buyer should not try to make a transaction. Evolutionary interesting is that humans most of the time
32
F. Schupp
have moved completely to another region when the food in their home region was scarce (see for example the German emigration to the USA after the crop failures in 1846 and 1847). This can lead to a complete drying out of the left region or it can lead to an establishment of a new centre elsewhere. In this context, I would like to mention the work of Krugman, who described the centre periphery model as a function of transportation costs. If the transportation cost is sufficiently low, goods between centre and periphery can be easily exchanged. Therefore, the centre will represent and concentrate the core of the economy and the periphery will supply the agricultural goods to the centre. If the transportation costs are high, the economy displays a symmetric regional pattern of production. Beware of centrifugal and centripetal forces that can influence the centres in positive or negative ways (Krugman 1991). Returning to the findings of Ganteför (2018) in his new book, it is worth mentioning the Brazil nuts effect. In this effect, granular convection is observed in selections of different nuts or muesli, e.g. when the nuts are transported from production to the shop. After transportation, the bigger Brazil nuts usually are located on top of the muesli or nut mix bag (Rosato et al. 1987; Rietz and Stannarius 2008). This effect occurs when the nuts or the muesli are being shaken during transportation. When shaken small spaces under or next to the nuts are temporarily being created. Those spaces are filled easiest with smaller granular elements. As a consequence, the larger size elements are being transported to the top of the bag. The Brazil nuts are comparably big in a nut mix. Therefore, they end up at the top. In my view, a similar effect can also happen when a buyer’s supplier portfolio is being shaken a lot. The bigger suppliers in the portfolio might come up quicker in times of strong competition even without showing a high level of own activity, while the smaller suppliers fill-in the small gaps by quickly getting smaller niche businesses. So, buyers please continue to maximize competition, but beware of the Brazil nuts effect. Therefore, the ones at the top might not be the ones that can quickly fill the gaps. The Brazil nut effect is of course real but might feel like an illusion. To clarify the question of what is real as such, I would like to draw your attention to the next paragraph.
20
Understanding the Supplier Requires Observation, Communication and Information
Just recently, I have read a quote from Garfield, who said ‘if it not a cat, it must be a dog’. In Latin, this would be called ‘tertium non datur’: A third solution is not possible (Urban 2011 according to the logic of Aristoteles). To better understand the question, I would like to refer to Heisenberg (1927). Heisenberg wrote about the trajectory of an electron in a way that such trajectory only starts to exist by our observation. The observation is the primary source of the image or better imagination that we get when studying nature. This statement was
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
33
challenged by Watzlawick et al. (1967) who observed that the truth might be the result of communication. Zeilinger (2001, 2003) concludes out of the both that it does not make sense to talk about a reality without the relevant information to it. This means that the real world might be different to the observed or communicated world. For purchasing, this is a highly relevant discussion item as many of us judge a situation, or specific suppliers in their current state or ‘current’ market situation, without own observation nor with underlying, related and relevant information. Therefore, we consider situations that are communicated to us as reality. This might not always be true, which is why I recommend visiting suppliers and to make own analyses. Only then, you can get a better picture about reality. Interesting in addition to this is that especially creative humans, who build new links by associations, are especially receptive for seeing correlations where those correlations in reality do not exist (Brugger 2001). Brugger concludes that out of an above average characteristic to see patterns, the good and wanted form of creativity also comes with the side effect of believing in nonsense. ‘Believing in nonsense is the price of creativity’ (Brugger 2001; Urban 2011). This point iterates as well that information gathering, and testing is required after developing a creative thought. This aspect of supporting a thought by data will be picked up later in this article when discussing advancements in science, or the science of science as such. What I mean is that it is not enough to visit suppliers only; it is also required to test and to check by data ideally on site. In favour of and fairness to all creative people, such supporting tests or proof of information might come into consciousness only many years after the creative thought has happened. We can see this with Einstein’s theory of special relativity, which was confirmed only 26 years after his discovery in 1905 (Einstein and Infeld 1938; Wickert 1972). In 1906, the thought could not be confirmed by observation or data yet.
21
The Art of Seduction
This paragraph at the first glance might be looking at a very small detail only, but in the real purchasing world the topic in my view it is relevant. I am talking about the point in time when a supplier is selected. The moment of truth after a buyer has decided for a new supplier is always the actual delivery of the contracted goods. On the one hand, this is a very naked moment and reveals the true content or features of the purchased good. On the other hand, the transaction is somehow also hidden behind curtains as the good itself is most of the time not uncovered by purchasing but by logistics or production or the end customer, especially when a buying company is large and works based on a process separation scheme. The transaction itself and also the trade as such therefore is a hidden process not visible to the outside of a company and even inside a company not completely transparent (Kaube 2014). This phenomenon in the context of love is called hidden sociality
34
F. Schupp
(Kuchler and Beher 2014). In the context of business-to-business or also business-to-consumer transactions, this hidden sociality could even be seen as embedded in a hidden society (Aubert 1965). A business requires closed rooms for discussions and negotiations, non-disclosure agreements, limits the number of actors to a defined circle, and describes itself even sometimes as a mystery. If it is really the case that purchasing in a business-to-business scenario is somehow hidden, the question of seduction in conclusion is an important one. In other words, how is the decision process for a supplier or vice versa for a customer exactly done? According to Aubert (1965), the preceding process of the hidden sociality is the seduction, or even the art of seduction. While the nature of seduction is characterized by an asymmetry of knowledge and the absence of a common planning, the seduction rests on the fact that it is not spoken out what just happens. Seduction therefore realizes learning by being surprised or by being tricked. In the context of purchasing, this phenomenon is widely known as the buyer is seduced by the supplier and the supplier is seduced by the buyer. Both parties do not know who the other side really is or what the other side will do. The target of both parties is to uncover the personality of the other. By that the value of seclusion, as, e.g. in love, might be partially lost, but such transparency for sure helps to understand the other party. Bottom-line the supplier selection process remains a process preceded by the art of seduction and proceeded by hidden sociality. And this most of the times even takes place in a hidden society. Assuming such context, the buyers are recommended to test their suppliers after supplier selection by transactional trial periods. In addition to this in the time of seduction and minimum after the first transaction, the supplier’s character and performance should be measured. Two sets of numbers might help to narrow the topic down. In a recent CAPS survey (CAPS 2019), it was found that 94% of the asked companies find their new suppliers through the procurement function itself. 46% are recommended by internal business partners, 42% are filtered out of requests for quotations and requests for information by pure competition, 24% are recommended or directed by externals especially by customers, and even 2% are found by crowd sourcing. The companies were asked in this survey to select the top three preferred sources to find new suppliers. Coming back to the sociology of love (Kuchler and Beher 2014), two-thirds of the marriages worldwide are not the result of seduction but are based on the initiative of the related families. Even in the so-called bourgeoisie, marriages are often related to business rational and heritage (Kuchler and Beher 2014). In the world of purchasing, I have a clear opinion. No customer–supplier relationship is sustainable without the preceding process of seduction and following selection always under the risk of partition when the transaction, the relationship, or the traded good itself was not meeting the expectation. To further understand the background for staying together or in other words sustainable buyer–supplier relationships, I want to briefly jump back into the animal world before having a closer look at relationships in humans.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
22
35
Lasting Pair Bonds
In socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), mating induces enduring or lasting pair bonds that are initiated by partner preference formation and regulated by several neurotransmitters resulting out of a chemical process that leads to an epigenetic change in their DNA. The trigger for this change is the first mating that the prairie voles have (Wang et al. 2013; Blawat 2013). As a result, the prairie voles remain to be loyal to each other. This happens by the epigenetic change of their chromosomes, which means that the spatial structure of the DNA changes in some areas, while the sequence of the DNA remains unchanged. The prairie voles remain the same personalities as before, but they feel closer to each other (than before). The mating releases a cascade of processes that result in the activation of genes that have been on mute before. Those genes then control the payout of oxytocin, vasopressin, and dopamine which stimulate the nucleus accumbens, the centre for happiness, here in the brain of the prairie voles (Wang et al. 2013). Mating in the direct sense is not present in buyer–supplier relationships. Therefore, we cannot say that initial buying induces enduring of pair bonds. On the other hand, we will see the positive effect of oxytocin on bonding in the following paragraphs. So, the partner preference formation might not come out of the buying itself, but if the partners do not meet at all, the regulating neurotransmitters either do not show up at all or are triggered by other impulses. In the purchasing world where buyers mainly use business-to-business platforms for sourcing and maybe even platform supported scouting before the sourcing (CAPS 2019), the pair bonding in the original, natural sense does not happen. For me, this is a sign that buyers should go to their potential suppliers to see and meet. Also, eating together allows proximity in order to understand better if a lasting partner preference can be formed.
23
Couples and also Singles Over-Rationalize Their Relationship Status as Being Ideal
The stronger the feeling of humans that their life as single or as a couple will not change in the near future, the more actively they will try to find reasons to explain why the live as they live (Herrmann 2013). In two tests, Laurin et al. (2013) found that the stability of the current relationship status is the decisive factor for this rationalization. In this context, stability according to Laurin et al. (2013) did not mean happiness. More so, stability in the above context can be explained by hopelessness. What does not change is treated as good, as Gilbert and Ebert or Killingsworth and Gilbert (Gilbert and Ebert 2002; Killingsworth and Gilbert 2010) have found. The people that cannot change a decision any more are happier with it. In personal relationships, Laurin et al. (2013) found that couples that think their happiness is defined by being together tend to not meet with happily single singles and vice versa.
36
F. Schupp
For us in the field of purchasing, this point is particularly interesting, as it could mean that once a relationship between a buying company and a specific supplier has been established, it might be seen as a good decision that should not be changed. This might explain why in many cases it takes a long time to change the supplier as a lot of convincing by the buyer is needed internally inside the buying firm in order to explain facts, but also to work against over-rationalization of the relationship status. On the other hand, some suppliers might think that they never are able to work with a specific customer as this customer lives in a happy relationship with another supplier. Going back to the previous paragraph, it probably makes sense to always stay on the market and to try to find better suppliers or better customers. In contrast to the private life, the business environment allows to do the one and the other.
24
The Interaction of Buyer and Supplier Depends on Trust
A sensitive topic in purchasing is the required and desired level of understanding between the buying group and the selling group. As well it is important to understand how buying groups and selling groups effectively work together to achieve their targets in the best way. In this context, it is worthwhile to understand the ‘click-effect’, which was described by Brafman and Brafman (2010). Brafman and Brafman claim that the interaction between two people works much more efficiently and effectively if a feeling of trust is present between the two. This status requires that a common language is found, personal characteristics are understood, and emotional connections are built. In many cases, such process takes time, but in other cases, the process can be accelerated a lot. This is the case when it clicks. First, this click-effect can create a unique or magic soul state, and secondly, it can change the basic nature of the relationship in a sustainable way. In the context of love, scientists have researched the biological background of such an effect and came up with the result that based on trust, dopamine is produced in a large extent which helps to stimulate the brain areas of desire and creates an increased positive attitude of life. So far, so good. But, is there a secret trigger that allows the click-effect to happen or can the occurrence of the click-effect be supported or stimulated? Brafman and Brafman (2010) found that the click-effect is not always a result of pure chance, but it can be influenced by several accelerators. The first accelerator is vulnerability. Many people believe that vulnerability puts themselves in a weak or inferior position (Brafman and Brafman 2013). When people show their inner fears or weaknesses, they believe they automatically give power and influence over themselves to others. In human interaction, however, vulnerability and self-openness are clear signs of strength.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
37
When we show our vulnerability, others start to trust us, just because we take a risk emotionally, psychologically, and even sometimes physically. The reaction of our counterpart is usually that this person also opens up in a similar way. The protective wall is down; a closer personal connection can start to exist. This aspect is especially interesting for work environments where verbal interaction is predominant allowing the transactions between the parties. Another aspect is proximity (Brafman and Brafman 2013). In a more and more digitalized world, it probable that we want to follow the efficient way of communication by smart IT tools. But this will keep us from the possibility to personally interact with the people that we want to work with. Several studies show that people who are located in a certain proximity to each other, e.g. on the same floor, will collaborate twice as much as people that are located on different floors. Even interaction between people of different departments is increasing when the departments are located on the same floor. One explanatory background here is the spontaneous communication. It is described by the coincidental communication of humans, because they simply find each other at the same location at the same time. The third aspect is the presence that somebody shows to and shares with another person (Brafman and Brafman 2013). If someone is fully or transformatively present in a specific situation, this person shows elements of care by active participation. Intensive listening, attentiveness are key attributes here. Similarity is another important accelerator for the click-effect (Brafman and Brafman 2013). Similarity leads to sympathy and attraction. In case we find felt similarities, we create an in-group effect that allows building a community. In-group members are likely to be seen more positively, the likelihood for likeability increases. If humans jointly experienced hard times and difficult situations have been successfully overcome together, the self-protective barriers are lowered, and a feeling of solidarity is created. The result is more trust. In such an environment, your counterpart will emotionally support yourself which allows ground for debate and positive conflict. In effect, persons and teams that have experienced the click-effect can be more productive and more successful (Murnighan and Conlon 1991). For buyers, this click-effect might be important as its consequence allows to create and manage the relationship between buyer and supplier. In this way, a true buyer–supplier relationship can be established and the frequently mentioned supplier management as a main element of purchasing can be performed. The risk of clicking-in is of course that the buyers develop too much understanding for the buyer. This problem by the way also works vice versa in the same way. This is why I suggest and follow the first rule of purchasing: ‘Always ensure competition before collaboration’. A very specific aspect in a competitive and in a collaborative relationship is the question of which hierarchy should talk to whom? Here, the following paragraph provides the first insight. A much deeper look into buyer–supplier relationship is offered by Kim and Choi within this book.
38
25
F. Schupp
Humans React Most Intensely on Other Humans of the Same Rank
The own social status decides significantly about how strong humans react to people that are on the same or on a different level in the social hierarchy (Ly et al. 2011; Zink et al. 2008). Ly et al. (2011) confirmed this by measuring the ventricle striatum activity through functional magnetic resonance tomography (fMRT) in the valuation system of the brain. This brain structure is more active when someone gives another person a stronger or higher social importance. In the test of Ly et al. (2011), the test persons were confronted with text statements indicating different social status while looking at photographs of people. Hearing statements like ‘This person was several times fired’ or ‘This person went to an elite university’, the test persons did not automatically give more importance or interest to the person of higher social rank. This finding was against the hypothesis of the research team. Adversely, the interest of the test persons was decided by the self-valuation of their own social rank. Only in those test persons that estimated the own social rank as high when they have been confronted with a photograph of people indicated with a higher social rank, the ventricle striatum was very active. In test persons with subjectively self-rated lower social rank, the interest was only focused on people with lower status. For the researchers around Ly and Zink (Ly et al. 2011; Zink et al. 2008), the results were not surprising, as similar studies with monkeys on rank dependency are known. But, between those and Ly’s study, there was one difference found. In monkey studies, the lower-ranked non-human primates also valued the dominant leading monkey. This aspect was not found in Ly et al. (2011). As a side comment, not clarified by the researchers yet is if humans have been emancipating themselves over this phenomenon. For us in the field of purchasing, the findings of Ly et al. (2011) can be confirmed. Quite often I find that higher-ranked individuals in the own organization and people how have a self-perception of higher rank like to talk to higher rank people at the suppliers. Vice versa, sales representatives at suppliers or business leaders being owners or executive directors want to talk to higher-ranked persons in the organization of the buying company. Unfortunately, for purchasing, sometimes the business leaders of suppliers want to talk to the business leaders of the buying companies and not to the purchasing leaders of the buying company. The complementary finding of Ly et al. (2011) is also present in purchasing. Many buyers who have a self-perception of their own lower rank do not want to talk or negotiate with higher-ranked individuals of the supplier. This is particularly problematic as the suppliers’ true decision makers are usually found in higher ranks. For purchasing leaders, this aspect leads to the so-called escalations, when lower-ranked buyers find they cannot solve a particular problem with the supplier by their own, they escalate to the purchasing leader avoiding to find a solution directly with the higher rank decision maker at the supplier. On the positive side, we should keep in
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
39
mind that this higher-ranked individual at the supplier most likely wants to talk to his own perceived rank at the buying company. These interesting findings lead me to another related field which is the reaction patterns when an unplanned event in the supply chain occurs. In such a case, e.g. when a quality problem at the supplier potentially causes a massive supply interruption at the buying company, purchasers need help.
26
Crying for Help is Heard by Partners
A research group around Liévin-Bazin (Liévin-Bazin et al. 2018) has studied emotional responses to distress calls in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus). These parrots were confronted with a conspecific distress call and their reaction patterns were scored. In the animal world, vocal communication is used to transmit information from emitter to receiver whereas information can be size, age, sex, dominance status, and also emotional status. The transmission of such emotional status is called emotional contagion and represents the first level of empathy. In the test with the cockatiels, three types of audio stimuli were transmitted to the receiving birds. A partner’s distress call, a non-partner’s distress call, and a control sound. Distress calls in this case were sound emitted like when a bird was caught or forcibly restrained. The calls were taken from familiar birds or from birds with a high level of affiliation. The latter are called partners; the familiar birds are called non-partners. As a first result, in all cases, the birds were more attentive and active when confronted with the distress calls rather than with the control sound. But when the distress calls came from a partner, the birds were significantly more attentive and active than when the call came from a non-partner. This could mean that distress calls not only function as stimulus triggering automatic reaction, but also transmit emotions. And, affiliation enhanced the emotional reactions in case of receiving distress calls from the same species. Of course, this is completely untested in the context of purchasing, but quite often purchasers are called to help from production leaders, from general management or from other groups in the company, even from other purchasers. My observation here is that if the caller is affiliated and not only known or even unknown, the willingness of the receiver to help is much higher with the affiliate partner usually followed by active support. Across the negotiation table, so to say, meaning between buyer and supplier this might also be the case. When buyers are calling suppliers for help, the level of reactivity partially also depends on the relationship status of individuals. Affiliation also is valued higher than familiarity. This might even be influenced by the type of business that the business partners are mainly active in. If the business culture of both is similar, the level of affiliation might be higher. If the business culture differs, the level of personal affiliation might be even more decisive.
40
27
F. Schupp
Super-Tasters for Bitterness Help to Stay Healthy
We know that it is important to meet up with suppliers in order to get to know them better. As described in the chapter of this book on the zero shades of grey, we also see that it is good to analyze the supplier product as such regarding failure or defect form, type, structure, and nature. What we have not discussed yet is which individual out of the purchasing team should meet up with the supplier or who should get in contact with the supplier’s products. In this regard, I want to direct your attention to the topic of bitterness (Zittlau 2016). Most of us know the taste of grapefruit, dark chocolate, or chicorée salad. The bitter taste of those products is registered by receptors on our tong, whereas we have 25 types of receptors for different forms of bitterness and by the way only one for each sweet and sour. The reason is that things that taste bitter are potentially poisonous. Because of this aspect, it is important to already identify potentially poisonous products in the mouth before they enter the body (Zittlau 2016). But, beyond the mouth bitter receptors also exist further inside the body. Lee and Cohen, who are molecular biologists, research cells that are and work as bitter receptors inside the body, in this case inside the nose and the lung (Lee and Cohen 2016). Lee and Cohen found that people with a strong reaction to bitter taste get less infections of the respiratory tract. Bitter receptors are located on the tong, in the nose, in the bronchia, in the heart, and in other parts of the body. Each fifth European reacts very sensitively to bitter products. Around 30% of the Europeans, however, do not react to bitterness. The remainder reacts normal. The taste sensitivity of humans is defined by their genes. While super-tasters are getting slightly less infections of the respiratory tract than others, super-tasters are much more immune against less frequent infections, caused by bacteria, e.g. such as pseudomonades that can cause pneumonia while pseudomonades are sometimes resistant to antibiotics. When getting in contact with the bitter items, the receptors start a mechanism of defence. The cilia are set in movement in order to cough out bacteria, then antibacterial substances such as nitric oxide are emitted, and finally, immune cells are called for help. Potentially, to induce this effect, bitter receptors can be stimulated purposely with medical plants or herbs. For one of those plants, the artemisia abrotanum, such an effect was already proven. The bitter taste of the medicine therefore is a part of the effect. Looking at the topic from the other perspective, medicine often tastes sweet (Zittlau 2016). Especially, children medicine tastes sweet. Bitter stimuli trigger the immune system; sweet stimuli can even slow the immune system down. This is the case because the brain wrongly assumes and believes that the body is saved. The immune system retracts and the blood sugar rises. Bacteria need sugar and now can benefit from a higher sugar level. Of course, this phenomenon is purely related to body physiology, but maybe the effect also plays a role in the business-to-business context. If a buying firm has no one in his purchasing team who can taste bitterness, bacteria can enter unhindered in the organism by purchased products. On the other hand, if an organization or organism has the ability to taste bitterness, it might be able to protect itself from
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
41
dangerous diseases. Suppliers might know this effect as well and could try to make their products taste sweet, e.g. by a good price. But, in reality, the product that is traded might have a bad quality without being identified by the receptors on the tong, represented by the purchasing employees. The brain might be tricked as well by nice savings and no substantially good product on the buyside. This means that most probably each buying organization should hire super-tasters and should beware of sweet tastes. On the sales side, by the way, customers can taste very sweet by promising a lot of volume and potential sales revenue, but maybe also here a good portion of bitterness tasting capability is positive for the focal firm. Maybe buyers and sellers should train their taste and eat less sugar, but medicinal herbs or dark chocolate from time to stimulate the bitterness receptors. The topic of food will be given a much closer look in the following paragraph. After having read it, you might want to buy your supplier a breakfast.
28
Invite Your Supplier for Breakfast
This paragraph deals with another aspect of human physiology. Whereas many studies about humans look at neuromodulation by inducing supraphysiological effects, e.g. by pharmaceuticals, I want to look at the natural way of life, namely I want to look at the buyer’s and especially at the supplier’s breakfast. And here, I do not want to limit our thoughts on manipulating blood glucose concentrations by, e.g. drinks that contain glucose. In contrast, I would like to focus on the normal breakfast itself assuming that buyers and suppliers eat breakfast. Strang et al. (2017) have performed two studies and repeated both studies a few times concluding the following. Food intake not only secures energy levels but also influences biochemical processes depending on different macronutrient compositions. These biochemical processes influence brain processes, including higher-level cognition, especially social decision making. Therefore, it is not only about whether or when we eat (Kahneman 2011), but also about what we eat. When talking about social decisions, researchers mean helping, trusting, or actions of social punishment. The latter can be assessed by the ultimatum game. In this game, actor 1 receives a good g from which he has to select a share s to offer this share s to an actor 2. If actor 2 accepts, both actors 1 and 2 get their share of the good, i.e. for actor 1 g minus s and for actor 2 s. If actor 2 rejects, both actors get nothing. Different studies show that receivers, actors 2, usually reject unfair offers, which is interpreted as a form of social punishment (Strang et al. 2017). The target of an ultimatum game is that actor 1 maximizes his return, by giving only a minimum share to actor 2. Already, with one payment unit greater than zero, the game has a return-oriented, rational solution. In practice, however, most of the offers that are lower than 15% are rejected, and on average, 30% is left for actor 2. If reputation is considered in the game, according to research by Nowak et al. (2000), even a level of 30% is rejected by actor 2, whereas reputation is defined as information about the behaviour of an actor 1 in the past.
42
F. Schupp
Coming back to the research of Strang et al. (2017), social decisions are responsive to influences from hormonal and neurotransmitter states. In order to analyze the impact of macronutrient composition of a typical Western-style breakfast on social decision making, Strang et al. first tested whether the composition of a breakfast has an influence on the social decision-making behaviour. In a second study, the researchers manipulated the macronutrient composition of the breakfast as such and the timing of the followingly played ultimatum game in order to monitor metabolic parameters while assessing social decisions. In the first study, eighty-seven subjects were asked to submit a detailed description of all food items that they consumed before 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. of the test day. The ratio of carbohydrates and proteins as a percentage of total energy intakes was calculated followed by a one-shot ultimatum game that each individual had to take. One interesting side result was that out of the 87 people, only 76 had breakfast. The remaining 11 were excluded from the following analysis. Another interesting result is that the following conclusions have been independent from age, body mass index, gender, or total energy intake. Based on a median split, two groups were formed, one with a high-carb/protein ratio and another group with a low-carb/protein ratio. When comparing the rejection rates of the ultimatum game, in which the subjects could punish a norm violator who had made an unfair offer, which means in the role of actor 2, in the low-carb/protein group 24% of the subjects decided to reject unfair offers. In contrast, 53% of the high-carb/protein group decided to reject unfair offers. This means that subjects who had relatively more cheese, yoghurt, milk, and relatively less bread for breakfast rejected unfair offers at a much lower rate. Now, if a buyer who eats breakfast and negotiates with a supplier in the morning of the negotiation day, a low-carb/protein ratio breakfast will lead him to lower rejection rates of unfair offers from his supplier. Decisive of course is, who is actor 1 and who is actor 2. If the buyer is actor 1 and has something to offer, e.g. a new business, and in return, he wants to get savings on running business or an improvement of business terms, the buyer might want to first find out about the breakfast of the negotiating supplier representative. If the supplier representative had a low-carb/protein ratio breakfast, the level of aggressiveness of the buyer’s offer can increase. If the offer of the buyer is too aggressive, the supplier may find the buyer’s offer unfair and rejects it. In such a case, the deal would not come into play at all. The second test of Strang et al. made use of the results of study 1 and designed a breakfast as a controlled meal to study the causal relation between the macronutrient composition and rejection rates. So, the target was to induce physiological fluctuations resulting out of a breakfast to assess the respective impact of a controlled low-carb/protein-breakfast with a 50/25% ratio and a high-carb/protein-breakfast with an 80/10% ratio composed out of in real-life available goods. Concretely, breakfast 1 was prepared with 88 g. wholegrain bread, 20 g ham, 5 g cream cheese, 30 g strawberry marmalade, 130 ml milk, 200 ml apple juice, 110 ml water, 225 g banana, and 225 g apple. The low-carb/protein ratio breakfast was prepared with 70 g sunflower seed bread, 70 g wholegrain bread, 40 g ham, 30 g cream cheese, 40 g Camembert, 240 ml milk, 200 ml water,
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
43
250 ml yoghurt, and 120 g banana. In study 2, the macronutrient composition of the breakfast significantly modulated rejection rates in response to unfair offers. Rejection rates were again significantly higher with high-carb/protein ratios, about 15% in the mean. But, the main target of study 2 was to identify the mechanism behind the decision-making process. The result shows a lower tyrosine level, higher tryptophan levels, and a steeper decline in postprandial blood glucose with taking a high-carb/protein ratio breakfast. The researchers also found that only changes in tyrosine levels significantly predicted changes in rejection rates while the tyrosine levels in both types of breakfast significantly differed as such. In previous studies when the overall energy content, glucose, declined below optimal levels, changes in behaviour happened followed by decreasing self-control (Gailliot et al. 2007; Masicampo and Baumeister 2008). But despite the fact that a steeper decline of glucose was also found in study 2 comparing high-carb/protein ratio with low-carb/ protein ratio, glucose was not predicting the rejection decisions of the probands. On the other hand, previous studies have already shown that brain tyrosine and its neurotransmitter product dopamine both are involved in social decisions. While dopamine neurons indicate reward prediction errors, meaning differences between prediction and experience of the reward, different tyrosine levels might increase rejection rates of the ultimatum game via an influence on dopamine. One constraint of study 2 is that only male subjects were analyzed as previous studies have shown gender differences most likely due to the metabolism differences. However, study 1 indicates that similar results can be expected with females. In any case, Strang et al. (2017) found that a modulation in the dopamine precursor, tyrosine, is the underlying mechanism influencing our social decision through macronutrient composition of our food, which means that the food intake based on its composition and content has an influence on antisocial behaviour. For those of you who are interested in knowing more about tyrosine might find it interesting that Justus von Liebig in 1846 first time has characterized L-tyrosine as protein component of cheese as it is present in large quantities in casein (Von Liebig and Poggendorf 1858). If you combine this knowledge with a recent article of Hawks (2019) who comments that enjoying dairy in adulthood is a genetic privilege that emerged only recently in our evolutionary history, you might want to ask yourself what you are having for breakfast. In my case, I like to eat yoghurt with muesli or a piece of wholegrain bread with two slices of cheese.
29
To Feel Disconnection as a Pain Is a High Motivation to Stay with a Partner
Coming back to prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), I want to study why partners stay together. Here, Oliver Bosch and Tobias Pohl from the University of Regensburg and Larry Young from Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, GA, have contributed significantly to the role and mediation of oxytocin in social relationships. Social relationships are important for the well-being of
44
F. Schupp
humans. Basically, there are two different types of relationships. One is the parent– child relationship and the other one is a relationship established between individuals and family, friends, co-workers, and of course partners. In both cases, the neuropeptide oxytocin plays an important role as it, when released within the brain, facilitates the formation of pair bonds and friendship as well as the positive effects resulting from those. Also, in the opposite way, oxytocin plays a role, as bond disruption or a loss of bond severely impacts the oxytocin system by a disfunction. This disfunction results in harmful physiological and psychological effects. As the ability to study the underlying mechanisms of social relationships is limited in humans, researchers like Bosch research comparable animal models that include pair bonding of partners and friends and biparental care of their offspring (Bosch and Young 2017). In that context, the behavioural and neuroendocrine factors associated with social bonding in male and female prairie voles have been extensively studied in the past decades (Pohl et al. 2018). The first study in this area was presented by Thomas and Birney in 1979 (Thomas and Birney 1979) describing the prairie vole as a monogamous species characterizing the mating system in a laboratory setting. Social structures of wild prairie voles were studied and male–female pairs were followed in nature over a longer period of time. Because prairie voles are affiliative and co-operative, and form enduring social bonds between both sexes male and female and provide the care for children by both parents, they are a valuable model organism to study social monogamy and neuronal pathways when forming partner preference also in humans. In this regard, I want to mention that in purchasing and supply management, I have experienced the formation of a lot of buyer–supplier relationships. In other words, it was always easier to create a new relationship with a new supplier than ending a relationship with an existing supplier. Usually, in practice, it is almost impossible to completely end a relationship with a supplier, only the magnitude, level or intensity of co-operation changes. I am also observing that many buyers, but more so members of non-purchasing departments in the buying company, fear to end relationships with suppliers. Only experienced and therefore trained buyers and the suppression of emotions in individuals can allow ending a relationship. Ambivalent in my observation are exposed leaders of suppliers that most of the times do not want to end a relationship with a customer, while others are ‘colder’ and do not fear ending a relationship. Having said that and coming back to prairie voles, Grippo et al. (2007, 2011) and Bosch et al. (2009) have studied physiological and psychological consequences of pair bond disruption in adult prairie voles. Here, it can be said that social isolation from same-sex individuals evokes gender-specific responses. In female voles, separation from another female causes depressive-like symptoms, whereas males do not react with such emotional consequence. In contrast to same-sex isolation, the sudden disruption of opposite-sex pair bonds provokes an increase in behaviours on a psychological distress level. Both, male and female, show a depressive behaviour which even is increasing when exposed to mild stress. On a physiological level, the cardiovascular system becomes dysregulated. By hormonal and corticosterone reactions, the stress level is chronically activated and elevated. From the opposite point of view, blocking the corticotropin-releasing factor
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
45
normalizes the emotionality of separated males and by the way also separated lactating mothers from their children. This corticotropin-releasing factor is expressed when male and female are separated, but not when male is separated from male. Surprisingly, the corticotropin-releasing factor is also high when male is together with the female partner, but the corticotropin-releasing factor does not have to be activated yet. Bosch and Young (2017) hypothesize that this constellation can guarantee the immediate activation if needed in case of separation. Or seen from the opposite side, while knowing that the corticotropin-releasing factor can be immediately activated, the maintenance of the pair bond encourages the partners to actively seek the presence of each other in order to reduce a separation-induced stress reaction. In summary, to feel disconnection as a pain keeps the prairie voles together. This has the consequence that the partners stay together, and by that, they secure the survival of their offspring. Of course, in the context of buyer–supplier relationships, we not only find personal relationships but a larger number of personal relationships forming a business-to-business or company-to-company relationship. It will probably take a while to study and analyze human relationships on the physiological level comparable to prairie voles research, and beyond this, it might take another while to research organizational relationships. But, for sure we can say that each organizational relationship consists of human, individual relationships that are subject to mediation by the oxytocin system influenced by corticotropin release. Therefore, I suggest keeping in mind that sometimes staying with a supplier or staying with a buyer might be driven by the fear to experience pain out of a potential bond disruption. The development of a good relationship is important for the business success and depends on trust and other items. But, on the other hand, disrupting a relationship might be necessary in times to allow a new orientation following a strategy to reach the next goal. At any time though, let us keep in mind that we are humans, one way or the other.
30
The Culture of the Negotiation Partner Influences the Result
Culture in our mind or according to our common understanding might be defined by theatre visits, symphonic concerts, or discussions amongst intellectuals. But culture also means typically present rituals or ways of doing things in a quotidian way. This could contain eating rituals, stories that are told within specific countries, specific music styles in a country, or ways of celebrating or discussing within a family. Generally, culture means the ability, custody, or information that members of a group pass along to other members of their group in a lasting way (Blawat 2016).
46
F. Schupp
Like as in humans, culture in animals can be particularly useful, e.g. when following specific hunting techniques as in orcas (Orcinus orca; Laland and Janik 2006). The result of the very effective and unfortunately also efficient hunting culture recently was observed by my family in Tromsø, Norway, where the orcas supported by climate change excessively hunt for narwhales (Monodon monoceros) who as a consequence are more and more endangered with a drastic negative effect on the local ecosystem. In the context of culture evolution and development, scientist speaks of social learning or social or even cultural cognition (Whiten and Watson 2018). In general, it can be said that the capacity for social learning is shared by humans, other primates, but also with fish, birds, and even with insects (Leadbeater and Chittka 2007). Whiten and van Schaik (2007) have proposed an evolutionary progression from simple social learning which is widespread in animals to cumulative culture as in humans. Based on this logic, an eight-stage model regarding the evolution of culture and cultural cognition was provided by Haidle et al. (2015) to lead to contemporary human cultures. When socially transmitted information diffuses to become a group-wide knowledge or behaviour in a species, scientists speak of traditions (Whiten and Watson 2018). Culture would then be a collection of traditions. While some researchers link the following ability of cumulative cultures, i.e. to constantly add up cultural learning, to humans (Tennie et al. 2009), Whiten et al. (2011) show that also in other species limited forms of capacity for cumulative culture exist. This means that the species learn genetically but also culturally by a ‘second inheritance system’ (Whiten 2005), while both systems are complementary and interactive. As chimpanzees are our sister species as being humans, I want to have a short look at the first dimension of social learning as described by Whiten (2017). Andrew Whiten has authored and co-authored more than 240 research publications in the field of social cognition in chimpanzees (Whiten 2011) and specifically on social learning, tradition, and the evolution of culture amongst others (Rae 2010). In his studies, Whiten observed a lot of cultural richesse with chimpanzees, and in specific, he has found 39 behavioural traits in chimpanzee groups that could not be fully explained by genetical influences nor environmental conditions. The findings can be embedded in this framework for ‘comparing cultural cognition across species’ (Whiten and Watson 2018) which divides social learning into three dimensions: population-level patterning of traditions, social learning processes, and cultural content. Elaborating only on the first dimension, the population-level patterning of traditions, I want to draw your attention to the research on wild chimpanzees. Starting with Jane Goodall, scientists began to collect long-term observational information on behaviour of chimpanzees from multiple field sites. Doing this, it became apparent that the chimpanzees living at the different sites also differed in their behaviour (Goodall 1986; McGrew 1992; Boesch and Tomasello 1998). Without apparent ecological explanation, some behaviours were absent in some sites while being present in others, summing up to above mentioned 39 different traits.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
47
One example is the cracking of nuts with the help of hammer and anvil performed by chimpanzees in the Tai National Park of Cote d‘Ivoire. Compared with the chimpanzees living at the Gombe Stream in Tanzania, which is the famous research area of Jane Goodall, the Gombe Stream apes did not look at nuts at all if they needed tools to open them. Not limited to tool-use, the differences in traditions compel foraging techniques to find food, communication, social, and even sexual behaviour [Whiten and Watson 2018, see here also the recent book of Bagusche 2019, who amongst other examples discusses the mating tradition of sea otters (Enhydra lutris)]. Whiten (2011) remarks in addition that a substantial and at the same time diverse portion of chimpanzee behavioural repertoire is culturally inherited and therefore as indicated above common to us humans, which according to Whiten is likely to characterizing our shared ancestry. While not wanting to extend the discussion on the distributional proliferation of cultures in other animals, multiple traditions of our common ancestors date back minimum of 14–15 million years (Whiten and Watson 2018). Transferring this aspect of population-level patterning of traditions, I want to tell a short story. Some two years ago, I was invited for a speech in the Conservatoire National Arts et Métiers in Paris, France. When finished with my speech, I was asked where I would go next from there. I answered I will go to a supplier in Bretagne, France, to discuss business problems. My French hosts were very surprised and did not understand at all, why a senior vice president purchasing would go to a supplier instead of the supplier coming to the office of the buyer. I identified this as a tradition being present in that cultural frame. Some traditions might not be present in different populations. Discussing the second dimension of the social learning framework, Whiten and Watson (2018) look at how the process of social learning is in fact happening. Here, the researchers split into biases and mechanisms. Social learning biases influence us when we utilize social information, meaning which behaviours and from whom we should learn them. Social mechanisms reflect and describe the way how and in which precision information is transmitted from the demonstrator to the observer. This processual aspect of social learning is also present in the purchasing and supply management context. For example, a supplier a might be biased from a past experience when a buying company has bought from the supplier’s competitor, but after a change in strategy, this competitor might not be as interesting any more for the buyer as before. The supplier a might still think that the buyer is not interested and therefore could be biased towards other potential customers resulting in lost chances. Another example that I have experienced myself is a supplier that delivered with bad quality for years, but after an intensive quality development programme, the same supplier objectively has improved. Decision makers in the buying company, however, still believe that the respective supplier is bad in quality, just because this was the case in the rather distant past. The buying company, therefore, might be biased. Another aspect is the person who transmits information. Here, my experience is that the functional origin of a person can be decisive for social learning. Concretely, the engineering head of a supplier or as recently self-experienced, the head of business operations of a supplier, who has an
48
F. Schupp
engineering background, both listen more carefully and consequently are more receptive to information that is coming from a high-level engineer of the buying company instead of the head of purchasing of the buying company as this person might be more perceived to be connected to the money side of things. The information observer in this example becomes a receiver biased by his engineering background. Such cultural aspects can of course be used by purchasing for its respective interests. When we look at learning mechanisms, we can also find interesting examples. One often discussed and not always understood example is the Japanese mechanism of learning. In this culture in my experience, the information of the content demonstrator is only received when a whole group with all related stakeholders at the supplier has understood and confirmed the information. The mechanism therefore works in a collective way of absorption. Other cultures might rather work in a way that once the highest management member has received an information and agreed to it, the rest of the organization executes accordingly without further challenge of the content that is therefore given or socially learned. Both ways can contain pitfalls out of biases of learners when to deploy social learning and whom to learn from (Giraldeau et al. 2002; Laland 2004). The third dimension of social learning is the cultural content. A key prerequisite for cumulative culture is to forego a highly inefficient behaviour to adopt a highly efficient alternative (Davis et al. 2016). This process of adopting in order to cumulate is reliably found in humans over chimpanzees (Dean et al. 2012), whereas chimpanzees sometimes even get stuck on first-learned behaviour (Marshall-Pescini and Whiten 2008). The capacity for cumulative culture at humans is unique (Tennie et al. 2009; Heinrich 2015). Nevertheless, the rapid cumulation of culture happened only fairly recently in human development (Semaw et al. 2003; Harmand et al. 2015; Stout 2011). If we translate the idea of cumulative culture into purchasing and supply management, my suggestion is to focus on the cumulative culture of your very business. In my case, as a buyer, I have experienced the telecom industry, the gaming industry, the machine-building industry, project business for energy production, and the automotive industry. All of those industries according to my observation have an own culture which has been created by adoption of efficient behaviours and by cumulation. To be able to succeed with your suppliers, therefore I suggest checking if your suppliers really understand and accept the cumulative culture of your business. Because, if this is not the case, either you, or your supplier, or both of you will either fail or have to adapt. After having developed a general understanding on the development of social learning and cultures, in the following paragraph, I would like to look at a specifically stable culture.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
31
49
Stable Cultures
We know from the studies of Whiten et al. and Goodall (Whiten et al. 1999; Goodall 1986) that cultures are defined by behaviour patterns. In consequence, the following research is setting an interesting frame for purchasing, in specific for the available negotiation stake and more important for the framing values and potential way of negotiation. Regarding the frame of negotiations in the sense of Wehling (2016), the cultural frame that includes language can determine or in a way limit the negotiation cake beyond the expected value out of game theoretical thoughts. With particular focus in this regard, I want to look at the development of human culture over time. Here, Baek, Minnhagen, and Kim (Baek et al. 2011a) presented thrilling results when analyzing family names of people living in Korea (Weber 2011). The researchers used ten historical family books that document the respective family trees in the Confucian tradition more than 500 years back. By means of random group formation (RGF), the researchers showed a mathematical correlation between the size of the population and the prevalence of the family name, Kim (Baek et al. 2011b; Kiet et al. 2008), which means the share of people with last name Kim out of the total number of Koreans was always the same. This was not the case for other last names that also increased or decreased over time. Baek, Minnhagen, and Kim (Baek et al. 2011a) are physicians and used a method out of theoretical physics to determine that out of 50,000 Koreans that lived in Korea in the year 500 AD, 10,000 carried the name Kim. It was the dominating name over 1500 years and this in a name context where in the early Korean time about 150 other last names were in use. The reasoning behind this fact is not fully confirmed, but the researchers speculate that the explanation to this state is stability. Most likely, the Korean culture remained stable over 1500 years, even when the population drastically increased in the same time frame and the territory of living has increased as well. The Korean culture simply swallowed other influences and kept theirs. For us in purchasing this means at first that cultural frames are relevant and second that cultural frames can define or narrow down the negotiation cake. If it is the culture to treat the customer as being king, this might be a necessity to be respected by the supplier. On the other hand, negotiation results have to be sustainable, i.e. the share of actor 2 in the ultimatum game might likely be relatively high and stable. If someone intends to break the ‘Kim’-culture, he or she needs good arguments, or a high leverage and potentially a lot of time. In my experience, taking the outside perspective might also be challenging. If purchasers outside of Korea do buy and import from Korea, the cultural fit is also relevant. Growth and cultural expansion might always be part of the negotiation and a supra-trade target. One supporting experience I can share adding to the findings above is a supplier day that I attended in South Korea. Most of the present suppliers were South Korean companies, by the way, dominated by the name Kim. The day began with singing the national anthem of South Korea in front of the national flag. This could support the argument of Baek et al. (2011a) that the Korean culture is particularly stable and sets a frame for the negotiation. By the way, in the early Middle Ages in Germany,
50
F. Schupp
people only had first names and no last names at all. Only when the population density grew, people had a second name mostly defining their profession or corporal attributes. In Germany, the negotiation frame therefore might be set by other cultural elements, maybe not the sustainability or stability in the narrow sense, but maybe set by professional values or natural frames. After having references to cultures as such as a potentially guiding element for negotiations or business-to-business trade, the following paragraph will touch upon the ‘we’-feeling of cultures.
32
Cultures Have Their Self-Esteem
If cultures try to expand their reach, they have to adapt, or they have to make others adapt, or they simply trade goods and services with minimal or gradual adaptation. If sub-cultures, cultures, or nations in the sense of cumulative culture with geographic boundaries estimate their own capabilities as exceptional by collective self-esteem, psychologist speaks of collective narcissism (Herrmann 2018). A positive way of putting this phenomenon could be to speak of a ‘we’-feeling. The problem is that a strong ‘we’-feeling can also lead to a way of hybris or importance overestimation of the own group. In such a situation, the idea creation or ideation process in a group might even be limited. Based on this thought, Zaromb et al. (2018) have asked test persons in 35 countries to quantify the share of their nation in world history. The historical achievements of a nation of course cannot be qualified in detail by such means, and the researchers did not target this aspect in the first place. They wanted to measure to which extent the people of a nation give an overestimated importance to their own cumulative culture. The result of the study showed the two highest scores in Russia with 61% and in Great Britain with 55%. Germany had 33% and the USA 29%. The test persons were informed before answering the test questions that a maximum cumulative score of 100% is allowed. But the total value of answers resulted in 1156%, which in itself represents a collective self-overestimation. By the way, inside the USA, the highest-scoring states were the founding states, e.g. Virginia. The lowest score was with Iowa. If we want to transfer this into purchasing, buyers might get one of the best price-to-cost and cost-to-sustainability ratios in Iowa. On an individual level, by the way, everybody always knows what he himself was able to achieve in the past. But of course, it is much more difficult to know what others have done. Because story telling refers to historical achievements, a great self-esteem can also lead to the feeling of being offended by others. If a buyer–supplier relationship finds itself in the overestimation-offence trap, measuring the relationships performance in real time and not looking at the past might be a good idea.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
51
When we study cultural behaviour and possible implications on buyer–supplier relationships, performance measurement, or the negotiation cake itself, the influence of genes is a natural question. This aspect might relate to a ‘first inheritance system’ as the genetic counterpart of the ‘second inheritance system’ (see above and Whiten and Watson 2018) meaning culture as consequence of tradition and social learning processes. After this intensive look at the development of cultures and their influence on our field, I would like to come back to the interaction between buyer and supplier. First looking at an example out of the animal world and then followed by what we should or should not wish for.
33
Make Sure that You Have the Right Speed for Your Supplier
Johannes Larsch and Herwig Baier from the Max-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology in Munich found the way how zebrafish follow each other. Zebrafish are small and obviously grouping together increases their probability for survival (Larsch and Baier 2018). Larsch and Baier found that the grouping mechanism of this fish is based on the adjustment of speed of movement. The fish exclusively check the way of movement of their neighbour zebrafish. Based on their required characteristic behaviour, the fish prefer a speed of 2–6 mm per second. If this speed is present, the zebrafish feel attracted by the other fish. Consequentially, they group and move along together. Such behaviour is also given when the other fish is not even a zebrafish. The adjustment of speed therefore is the nucleus of swarm building. Other characteristics, however, e.g. such as the look or the smell of the other fish, are not decisive for the zebrafish. Also, it is not important for the leading zebrafish how the newly following zebrafish is behaving. This means that the communication of the swarm is not a dialogue, it is a one-way street. I found this example in the animal world very interesting for purchasing and supply management. Especially in business-tobusiness, but also in consumer-to-business purchasing, the speed of the customer is decisive for the business success. If the buying company is too fast or too slow for the supplier, the supplier will not be able to follow with the required distance. As a result, we will see either extensive excess inventory or supply interruptions. In rather extreme cases, the buying company and the supplying company do not fit together at all as the immanent speed of their own species might not fit at all to the speed of their business partner. In such cases, it is best to stop the relationship and to regroup. In my experience, those cases are not even rare but can be found rather often. It is up to you, to judge your own cases.
52
34
F. Schupp
Buyers to Think About Which Business They Offer to Suppliers
Gino, Adams, and Flynn have conducted a series of studies that analyze gift giving (Flynn and Adams 2009; Gino and Flynn 2011). Gino and Flynn from Harvard and from Stanford University invited some participants to their study to create an online wish list and others to select from this list (Gino and Flynn 2011). The wish list group had to select an item from the list; the surprise group could see the list but had to pick something else of equivalent value. Of course, people were happier with items taken from their own wish-list. But surprisingly, people have rated those choices as thoughtful and personal. People somehow suppress the knowledge that the item was picked from a list and the same people think that the person who is giving really understands the receiver. The same researchers found similar results in weddings. Invitees to the wedding were to pick from a wedding present list and the wedding couples were comparably more delighted to receive something from the list instead of being surprised. In another study, Gino and Flynn (2011) asked people to reflect on what they have received. When people give away purely on their own thought, they think they were well-chosen and probably appreciated. When people receive those, they see them often as a waste of time and money. People should also not try to compensate by spending more. The recipients do not care. Adams and Flynn found in their study about wedding rings that the women did not care about the price the ring had cost. Both researchers found a similar result when they asked people to think about birthday presents, they had been given or that they received. The recipients were just as happy with inexpensive gifts, while givers expected otherwise. As a conclusion, it can be said that givers and receivers see things differently. The giver imagines that the ideal item is costly and is hand-picked. The receiver does not care about a high value, but he does appreciate being bought a present that they had already selected. Therefore, we should ask more questions before to give and we can even spend less (Harford 2016). In the context of purchasing and supply management, both sides buyers and suppliers are givers and receivers. And, just for making this clear, this chapter is not targeting corporate compliance research, it is looking at business-to-business projects and at negotiations. In cases, when buyers offer business to suppliers, the suppliers might not be happy about receiving the specific business. One reason could be that it does not fit to their capabilities or needs. If a supplier does not indicate which business is on his wish list, he could be unhappy in the end. From a buyer’s perspective, something similar might be the case. Suppliers might want to give price down offers to the buyers, but the buyers would be happier about a prolongation of payment terms to protect their working capital. Here as well it makes sense to indicate preferences. Thus, cultural frames are again the ones that might keep supplier or buyer away from signalling their preferences. And, by the way, when having a quick look at the corporate compliance research, the findings of Gino and Flynn (2011) can drastically reduce corporate compliance risk as a
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
53
by-product as the transparent signalling between buying and selling company leads to higher explicitness in the trade exchange. In any case, it makes sense to calculate what is offered. Please, keep in mind the Weber–Fechner law in this regard.
35
Do not Give in Without Calculating
In negotiations, sometimes purchasers give in supposedly small amounts of money when big numbers are being discussed. One reason might lay in the Weber–Fechner law. The background is that in our brain, numbers are not lined up or memorized in a linear, but in a logarithmic way (Dambeck 2016). More precisely, our brain’s scale is logarithmic, i.e. the distance between the number 1 and the number 10 is felt as being similar compared to the distance between 10 and 100 or 100 and 1000. This distortion is called Weber–Fechner law. When comparing two numbers, our brain does not use a saved table in which it is written that, e.g. the 6 is bigger than the 5. To explain the phenomenon, Izard and Dehaene (2008) introduced the imagination of a number line in our brain by the multiply used tape measure of a tailor. If you imagine the tape measure of a tailor in your mind, to be able to decide if a 9 is greater than a 1, a quick look or glance at the tape measure is enough. But, to differentiate between a 5 and a 6, sometimes you have to look twice in order to understand which number is located more to the right of the other number, especially when the tape measure frequently has been in use and is not fully readable any more. Ditz and Nieder (2016) state that a logarithmic scale seems to be the best way to mentally picture numbers. In this context, Wehling (2016) explains and shows that humans think in images or, in other words, remember by imagining pictures. Nieder and Dehaene say‚ small numbers are memorized and pictured very precisely, big numbers relatively vaguely (Nieder and Dehaene 2009). Experiments show that the number line in the brain is also compressed logarithmically even with crows. Ditz and Nieder (2016) and their team trained carrion crows (Corvus corone) to compare numbers between 1 and 30. The crows had to decide on a touch screen if a point cloud after repetitive display on the screen would be same or different to the one before. The crows made mistakes, but numbers like 1 and 2 or 2 and 4 got mixed-up much less often than numbers between 20 and 30. Similar experiments were performed with humans who showed the same distortion. One advantage of this way of imaging could be to better estimate small and medium versus large quantities of food or to judge a number of predators approaching to us. Objects and numbers that occur in quantities between 1 and 4, humans and animals such as apes and crows can understand with one look. But, if the numbers increase above 4, we do not focus on the total number of objects but look for amounts. As an example, humans can understand the difference between 10 and 15
54
F. Schupp
green apples quicker than to get the delta between 30 and 35 objects, despite the fact that the calculated difference is the same. In other words, the numbers 30 and 35 are located closer to each other in our brain than the 10 and the 15 while using a logarithmic scale. In our field, purchasing and supply management, this might mean that when asking for savings in per cent, the above effect should also be taken into account. Year-on-year savings or price comparisons from 1 to 4% can be understood immediately. Starting from 5% of buyers and sellers might not easily be able to differentiate from other values such as 6 or 7%. Another aspect to be taken into account could be linked to the Weber–Fechner law. When Kahneman (2011) talks about cognitive dissonance when humans try to get a better deal for sports shoes for a price delta win of 5 Euros by running from shop to shop and leaving out on a price delta win of 5 Euros when buying a new TV-set with a price of 1005 Euros by staying in one shop, this phenomenon could also be related to the logarithmic scale in our brain. And by the way, animals cannot count. And humans without mathematical training intuitively use a logarithmic imaging. This holds true for Amazonas tribes or pre-school children. The logarithmical scale is only being linearized during mathematics class in school, mostly in year 2 or 3 in elementary school according to Ditz and Nieder (2016). But, if we have to decide quickly also as adults, our nonlinear scale is coming to play again, e.g. when estimating quantities. This phenomenon might be analogously present during the guessing of the exact quantity of a jar full of beans or how many balls would fit into a swimming pool. Many people drastically are wrong in guessing the correct number. In the purchasing world, quantity estimations and confirmations by purchasers according to my experience are many times lacking foundation and control calculations. Therefore, such estimations sometimes might be subject to the Weber–Fechner law as well. In order to really perform in mathematics, a symbolic understanding of numbers is needed. This cannot be found with animals. In other words, humans can count, animals cannot. Coming back to the potentially ‘right’ number of requested savings in per cent: Here it might be a good idea to ask for 7%. Why? Bellos (2010) has asked 30,000 people about their favourite number. Almost half of all interviewees have replied with a number between 1 and 10. 6.7% liked the number 8 best, 7.5% the number 3, and 9.7% favoured the number 7. The 7 is a prime, and according to Bellos, it is invisibly present in our daily life. The week has 7 days; there are 7 continents, 7 seas, and 7 planets at the sky during the antiquity (Poundstone 2015). Another explanation by Bellos is that we can count from 1 to 10 with our fingers, which might explain the preference for the numbers 1–10 amongst all others. Within this frame, according to the study of Kubovy and Psotka (1976) from the University of Yale, probands had to think about a number between 1 and 10. 1 and 10 basically have not been mentioned by the subjects of the study as they mark the endpoints of this frame. 5 is exactly in the middle and does not feel random enough. 2, 4, 6, and 8 are even numbers and therefore are too sorted or organized. According to the
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
55
researchers, our brain calculates this way. Remain the numbers 3, 7, and 9, whereas the 9 can be composed of 3 times 3. The number that feels random and unique at the same time is number 7 and was predominantly mentioned by 28.4% of the 558 persons participating in the study. Kubovy and Psotka (1976) performed another test to choose a number from 0 to 9, whereas to use only whole numbers such as the number 7. This mentioning in the question leads to a reduction of interest on 7 to a percentage a little higher than 16% and the numbers 3 and 5 also being of similar interest to the test persons. As a result, we can say that the number 7 is still very interesting, but the responses to Kubovys’ and Psotkas’ questions depend on complying with the request for a spontaneous response. In other words, the 7 is a unique number, but it always depends on how you put the question if the 7 gets a very high or a reasonably high interest. Therefore, other numbers, such as the 3, should also be in your scope. Of course, buyers will continue to ask for price reductions according to the price differences offered by several suppliers in competition with each other. But, for year-on-year productivity negotiations or dedicated project negotiations, a second thought about the suitable number requested by you might make sense. In the above explanation, we already saw that we are not perfect in validating price differences of different goods when comparing the number deltas themselves. Beyond this aspect, another phenomenon is of interest as well. We are also misled by differences in status perception of the goods that we compare.
36
Testosterone Helps to Increase the Demand for Status Symbols
Nave et al. (2018) have tested the influence of testosterone on purchasing decision for goods with similar quality on the one hand but with a difference in perception of a promised related status. One example in this regard is clothing. According to the test of Nave et al. (2018), men with a measured high testosterone level, in the moment of decision making, decided significantly more frequently for products that supposedly promise a higher status to them compared to products that suggested a lower status (Bartens 2018). In a second test, luxury products, such as watches, pairs of sunglasses, or fountain pens, were linked with different attributes such as either long lifetime and superior quality or high status. Here as well, the probands decided against quality and efficiency and in favour of status. The scientists therefore concluded that the consumption behaviour is partially biologically motivated. Plassmann (2018) saw a similarity in this regard with behaviour by animals with a proven correlation between testosterone and status behaviour (Plassmann 2018). This is because a higher status gives advantages that allow a better access to resources, more influence, and more possibilities for partner choice. Keeping this in mind, the researchers also know that the testosterone level of males increases, when the males compete or when attractive females are around. Nave et al. (2018) assume that in those situations, males are more receptive to status
56
F. Schupp
symbols and related discussions. For us in purchasing and supply management, this can mean that we should not allow competing males to negotiate together or in order to safeguard the result to apply strict sourcing rules that are fact-based including, e.g. quality data and price history. As well it might impact the negotiation result, when an attractive female buyer or an attractive female seller is in the room, when the negotiation leaders decide for potentially status influencing goods. This could lead to less focus on quality or price and more focus on status. Beyond the individual level, Nave et al. have identified also a cultural difference in behaviour especially when markets develop very quickly, such as in China. The tendency towards luxury could be directly related to the testosterone of males, whereas the consumption behaviour could be explained by different social pressure, population density, and the supply of potential partners. In the field of purchasing and supply management, status in my opinion could also be expressed by the method of buying and not by the purchased good itself. Some buyers might want to negotiate in a very hard or explicitly discussed way to obtain status rewards from their peers when reporting about a negotiation result with a supposed success. From a sales perspective, the negotiation partners should not be aware of testosterone influences or vice versa. If competition in one way or the other is present on the same side of the table, the trade might neglect measurable attributes besides status. Having discussed the influence of perceived status impact of the purchased goods, the age of negotiators might also play a role.
37
High-Patience Young Adults Go for Money, Not for Time and Money
A very specific, at the same time highly amount and effort sensitive, and time-consuming task in purchasing and supply management is the so-called claim negotiation. Origin of such negotiation is either a quality claim or a logistic claim from a buyer towards a supplier before which the supplier delivered a faulty or defect product that consequentially created a source of loss or cost at the buying company. Such negotiations are non-productive, but cathartic, and are in scope of purchasing. To get closer to a better understanding of the processes in such a negotiation, I came across the work of Amasino et al. (2019). Amasino and colleagues from Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, researched intertemporal choices in a complex experiment involving trade-offs between the value of a reward and the delay before those rewards were experienced. The subjects had to chose between options containing a monetary reward in absolute dollar amounts and a time component in days until payout of same for always two options one short-term option with low return and this on the same day, and a longer-term option with a higher reward and a longer waiting period of up to one year. The first result of the study was that the processing of amount of information and time information had un-correlated contributions to the choice process. This means that the probands did use both sources of information for their decision, but not in a correlated way.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
57
A second result was the finding that high-patience individuals were showing more bias towards amount information. Rather than using a slow and analytic comparison process that took into account all available information, those high-patience individuals tended to follow a heuristic strategy basically directly comparing amounts and choosing the higher amount. Low-patience individuals examined both amount and time information and chose by combining both. In addition, the results in the test revealed a strong bias towards an attribute-wise comparison process, rather than an integration of attributes within a choice option. The authors are convinced that their findings can contribute to an improved understanding of the mechanisms of intertemporal choice, which could help to reduce negative real-world outcomes (Story et al. 2014; Lempert and Phelps 2015; Bickel et al. 2014; Bulley and Pepper 2017; Meier and Sprenger 2012; Bruderer Enzler et al. 2014; Chapman 1996; Tsukayama and Duckworth 2010; Hardisty and Weber 2009; Jimura et al. 2011). In our field purchasing and supply management, the results suggest that high-patience individuals should negotiate claims that potentially take a lot of time until finalization and include high insecurity regarding amount information. These individuals tend to mainly include amount information in their decision process, and they decide by heuristics, i.e. by previous experiences. In other words, it is better to let experienced high-patience individuals negotiate complicated cases. The alternative would be to compromise on amount for time, i.e. an earlier return, which would be more accepted by low-patience individuals. The target of this chapter is to give you input on how to effectively and efficiently improve your purchasing behaviour and results. Taking a bird’s perspective for a moment I ask myself, on how we learn or in other words, how fast does science bring up new knowledge, and how fast are we able to incorporate those aspects into active learnings. The following paragraph will give you insights on this aspect.
38
The Contextual Cognitive Frame Grows in a Linear Way
The science of science is a comparably young branch of science (Fortunato et al. 2018). It tries to understand the structure and development of science as such in order to create tools and strategies to improve and speed up scientific knowledge creation (Anderl 2018). Scisci, the science of science, is data-based and benefits from digitalized scientific publications. One of the Scisci targets is to identify patterns in said publications. The father of Scisci is Derek de Solla Price, a physicist and science historian, who quantitatively analyzed scientific publications in the early 1960s (Anderl 2018). His basic finding was that scientific journals and publications grow exponentially. De Solla Price published a book called ‘Little science, big science’ (1963) outlining his thoughts and findings in this regard. Sola Price asked ‘Why shouldn’t we use the tools of science to analyze and understand science itself? Why not measuring, generalizing, defining hypotheses and concluding?’ But, for this target, De Solla Price at the time had to go back to
58
F. Schupp
laboriously collected data by other scientists such as, e.g. the mathematician Muir who between 1906 and 1930 created an extensive list of mathematical publications from the eighteenth and nineteenth century related to his research field (Maritz 2005). What De Solla Price did not have back then in the 1960s is text analysis capabilities leveraging a large scale of publications, as he could not use computer analysis. He could not conclude from one database to another by crosslinks nor could he retrieve metadata by simple counting or text recognition. By the way, a similar type of effort as at Muir but of course at a different magnitude and encountering the same problems as De Solla Price I found in a publication by one of my ancestors. Schupp (1964), later court chaplain in Fürstenberg, has collected all peoples’ names living in the city of Pfullendorf in Germany and linked this information up with where they lived in the city, what they did for living, who they married, how many children they had, and where they came from before living in Pfullendorf. With the help of computers, this effort would have been comparably minor. At the time, it was a great effort. Following De Solla Price and other researchers from the middle of the last century, Milojevic (2015) analyzed several characteristic terms in the field of physics, astronomy, and biomedicine out of 20 million publications. Milojevic’s analysis then with the help of computers has shown in addition to De Solla Price that different to the growth of the number of publications, the terminological or cognitive frame of the publications grew slower, actually in a linear way. Others, such as Vincenot (2018), have researched the content creation behind different terminologies but related to the same methodology in different fields of science and the penetration of same in the respective other fields of science. A similar question is currently very present, when the number of citations of research publications is measured, with the problem that the number of mentions does not at all refer to the content development itself. This aspect was already identified by De Solla Price with two phenomena pointing in opposite directions. Frequently cited publications get more importance and sleeping beauties are not being discovered despite their content relevance. Other studies point out that the combination of so far non-combined ideas and results, that invalidate expectations, create a special effect. Publications of a group of scientists are cited more frequently than articles of single researchers. This can also mean that innovation is being slowed down or inequality is enforced. Clauset et al. (2017) therefore recommended to add controlled experiments to data-based methods in order to identify causal mechanisms. The present chapter on ‘Elements of Purchasing in Nature’ therefore targets to identify interesting findings that relate to or could relate to purchasing in practice. It is meant to link aspects and findings that potentially have not been linked before. Findings in different fields of science from a content and abstract contextual point of view can be highly relevant for the field of purchasing and supply management. Although the findings in other fields might not have been tested in purchasing and supply management, they might be very relevant and true. In order to verify or falsify those, I recommend following Clauset et al. (2017) and to perform controlled experiments in an action research approach. This way requires more pracademics or team work between academics and practitioners to bridge the gap between
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
59
methodology, pure thinking, and learning from each other. In this regard, another highly relevant paper by Flexner (1939) might give food for thought on ‘the usefulness of’ potentially ‘useless knowledge’. In parallel to this, I want to recommend keeping in mind the findings of Milojevic and De Solla Price that the content of each research field, and here in specific the field of purchasing and supply management, does not primarily depend on the number of publications, but might be as well subject to a linear development of content and cognitive frame. This content development and cognitive frame however might not be only the result of pure thinking, but as well might be influenced by the social context of the time of creation. To point out to this aspect, the following paragraph will discuss the influence of social context on the linguistic frame and consequential bias.
39
Matching of Social Context and Linguistic Frame
Price is derived from demand and supply!? This economic truth might be, amongst others, biased by frames as already having been discussed in the paragraph about framing. Language hereby influences the behaviour of people. Against this background, the findings of Acerbi et al. (2013) are very interesting for us in the field of purchasing and supply management. Acerbi et al. (2013) analyzed English literature of the twentieth century in order to identify if social feeling and political situation are reflected in the usage of words. The researchers found a trend that based on five million books that have been digitally analyzed out of the Google Ngram-data set, the identified quantity of the words happiness and anger has decreased, whereas emotions that are transported by words related to fear have increased. The researchers looked at six different mood categories being anger, aversion, fear, happiness, surprise, and sorrow. According to the findings of the researchers, the frequency of occurrence of emotionally positive or negative terms in books varied depending on the phase of social carelessness or of severe events. Thus, terms and expressions related to happiness occurred significantly more in the 20s and 60s than in other phases of the century. Tristesse or sorrow came up frequently in books written during the Second World War. In other words, the language of a certain period in time is biased by the corresponding social mood or economic situation. If we now look at this phenomenon from an opposite direction, it could mean that if a buying company finds itself in an own economic crisis or the buying company might operate in a specific market under crisis while most of the other markets in an economic zone are doing fine, a supplier might not understand the language of the specific focal company in crisis. This might especially be the case when the supplier delivers into several different industries and markets. Only, when the language in the above example is being adapted to crisis at buyer and supplier, also the supplier might be willing to undergo crisis behaviour. In strategy literature, this aspect is explained by common or shared vision (Schupp 2004). Only, if both, buyer and supplier, share the same vision, they will act towards the same goal.
60
F. Schupp
Under-researched in this regard is the twilight-zone between buyer and supplier when one of the two is still in a downturn and the other one is already experiencing a market picking up or vice versa as explained above. As a conclusion, you should always double-check the matching of your own and your supplier’s social context and the corresponding linguistic frame. Related to this phenomenon, the following paragraph adds an individual perspective to the general social context that you might yourself find in.
40
The General Search for Happiness Can Increase Negative Feelings
Following the above, a general strive for happiness can create enforced negative feelings at the level of individuals (Herrmann 2015). Bastian et al. (2015) demonstrated in this regard that people who experience depressive periods or simply a bad day at the same time feel isolated and lonesome. The reason behind this lies in the feeling to violate social norms. This especially can be the case, when societies give a high value to individual well-being and happiness, while negative emotions adversely are seen as unwanted. The stronger the probands in the researchers’ tests believed that their social environment disapproved their fear or sorrow, the more they felt lonesome or isolated. Western societies put an increasingly high value on well-being and good feelings. Constantly, individuals are asked to be or to think positive, to enjoy or to be optimistic. If you want it, you can achieve everything, the so-called can-do attitude. This permanent pressure to live a positive life can create bad mood at the level of the individual. Bastian et al. (2015, 2011) prove in their study that the stronger the felt expectation of having a positive basic preposition or attitude the worse the mood of the individual got. An additional study shows that this can create specific feelings of isolation. As a conclusion, good mood cannot be enacted and vice versa, the feeling of defeat cannot be controlled from the outside. Both feelings have to develop intrinsically or inside-out. For the field of purchasing and supply management, this aspect has a certain relevance in situations where, e.g. a specific supplier has a bad feeling or feels lonesome with its situation. All of the environment is positive and expects positive mood from the specific supplier. But, in contrary to the expectation, this supplier acts against the good feeling supposedly obstructed with negative moves. Especially critical in this regard are suppliers that are mid-sized and lead by an individual that has more or less the sole power over the supplying company. If such individual feels suppressed by positive expectation, the reaction can be counterproductive for both parties. From the other point of view, a selling company might not be able to transport the positive growth attitude to a customer when the customer has a bad phase. In both scenarios, the best solution might be to leave customer or supplier alone for a period of time to bring own positions and personal feelings in harmony.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
61
Harmony or balance is the keyword that brought me to the overarching question of the next two paragraphs on the power of music and the power of lavender. Both in my view have an influence on us and our field.
41
The Power of Music
Rentfrow and Gosling postulate that the music preference of a person is the key to his or her personality (Rentfrow and Gosling 2003; Gesundheit 2018). In this regard, heavy metal or rock music-loving people are possibly eager to learn and are risk-loving and physically active. People that like to listen to classical music, blues, or jazz are rather intellectual. Pop song and slow song preferences are characterizing sociable and friendly people (Rentfrow and Gosling 2003, Gesundheit 2018). Music is an accompanying element of humans, minimum for the last 35,000 years when flutes made out of bird bones and mammoth ivory were used to entertain. Even before music playing, singing developed coming from the Stone Age time parallel to language development. And, singing or more precisely the volume of the voice indicated health status and power and therefore is suitable to impress potential mating partners. If we see this development or evolvement and compare it with the research of Ihle et al. (2015) on the mating behaviour of zebra finches, we might see relevant parallels. Staying a little bit with Ihle, the two music researchers Altenmüller and Kopiez (2005) have shown that music is mediating mate choice in humans, but in a more complex way. The main influencing factors are experienced with the musical genre, in other words early exposure, touching moments related to music and emotional memories. This means that music has an influence on human partner choice but by ways of exclusion criteria such as described also by Sunnafrank (1992) in the context of attraction. But independent of individual preferences, music has an enormous power and impact (Altenmüller and Kopiez 2012). Music can reduce tensions and stress, can wake up memories, brighten the mood, and music can even reduce prejudice. Common music playing or singing beyond the above, fosters co-operation and supportiveness, creates group effects and trains our ability to anticipate. This aspect is particularly helpful when communication by language is lacking, e.g. with disabled people, or kids that have cancer or refugees that do not speak the language of the host country. In the business world, this aspect is more and more relating to data communication and social media communication without being social. Here, music might be a solution to create proximity (Tüpker 2005). Melodies even allow to enter into unconscious processing and to create experiences that words cannot achieve (Tüpker 2005). This aspect is particularly interesting for us in the discussed field of purchasing and supply management. If we can set the tone, the melody, the rhythm of the play, we can enter into unconscious processing according to the set cultural rules of the markets that we operate in. Here, I can report a new buyer that I met recently. The buyer was trained in the food industry and is now operating in the automotive
62
F. Schupp
industry. The suppliers and peers are thrilled by the clarity and directness of the buyer’s negotiation style and claim sustainability or long-term orientation instead of short-sightedness or short ranging impacting decisions. Food can easily get rotten, automotive parts normally cannot. The cultural background or rhythm of the play in the two industries might be different. The tone though in both industries is tough. This element created common ground in the specific example, opening unconsciously the supplier’s mind towards the request of the buyer. Going even beyond the ability to create group effects, acoustic signals can work like a kind of social bonding. According to Koelsch (2010, 2012), the general musicality of humans most likely had a great importance for the development of language and has the social function to experience community and the co-ordination of co-operative actions. In purchasing and supply management, this means that if we want to create a good relationship with customer or supplier, you have to sense the music in the language of your business partner and best would be to listen or even play music together. If this allows to happen, the co-ordination of complex tasks will be more successful. Modern brain imaging technologies show that when listening to music, human adults do not only show reactions to the music in an isolated brain area, but several areas of our brains are reacting. Amongst others, also the nucleus accumbens comes to play, which is the reward centre of our brain that for example is also activated when we eat chocolate (Blood and Zatorre 2001). Convenient sounds influence the activity of the amygdala in the prefrontal cortex and suppress fear and nervousness. Before you enter into difficult negotiations, therefore I suggest that you listen to agreeable music. This will suppress your fear and the result of your negotiation most likely will be better. Besides the neural structures, the neurotransmitters are also being activated when we listen to music. In this context dopamine, serotonin and endorphins are emitted and create a feeling of happiness and easiness. If you go to the extreme and sing together with your customer or supplier, on top of the previously said, your oxytocin level will rise creating bonds and trust I once attended a supplier day in South Korea, and the beginning was impressive in the above regard. Almost all participants together sang the national anthem of South Korea. There is no better way to glue people together and then subsequently ask for savings. The other way around could work as well. If a buyer or a seller is depressed after a negotiation, the display of music can help to treat the depression and to turn the mood of the business partner into a good one. So, please make sure that in your reception and farewell area, chill-out music is played. Going further, melodies activate the neuroplasticity. In the long run, synapses, nerve cells, and even complete brain areas can be changed by listening to good music (Altenmüller and Kopiez 2005).
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
63
The corresponding effect is that the musical memory has a close link to the biographical memory. All parents know this when their kids memorize text by singing them. In the business-to-business environment, therefore it could be beneficial to let the business partner listen to your wanted message in form of a song. If you can manage, that your business partner sings your song, she will not forget your message. By this, you might be able to overcome Zeigarnik (1927). At the same time, the findings of Wehling (2016) remain to be true.
42
The Balancing Effect of Lavender
What is the picture that you have in mind when you dream about Southern France in summertime? Most of us have long fields of aligned lavender plants in front of their inner eye. Peace and calm come into our body. Blue-violet colour and a reminder of Southern flair are helping our muscles to relax (Sip 2014). Breckwoldt and von Luckner (2012) have published a whole book on lavender and its effects. In the Middle Ages, lavender was already used as herb, kitchen spice, bathing additive, fragrance, or as an element in aromatherapy. In antiquity, even the clothes were washed with lavender in order to get a good and calming smell while wearing the clothes. In the Middle Ages, lavender grew in the herb gardens of most of the farms in Europe to be used as protection against vermin and as nerve agent to improve the healing of wounds, to alleviate pain and to ease tension. The latter is targeted also in today’s use of lavender as the odour of the plant has a balancing effect and reduces stress. The reason for this is the etheric oil that constantly is set free. In purchasing, buyers very often have to negotiate. A negotiation is a situation that is subject to stress and while buyers normally are stress-resistant, important negotiations might put pressure on the individual. In such a situation, like to chose for the right breakfast, a cup of lavender tea the evening before the negotiation might be the right thing to drink in order to have a relaxed and good preparatory sleep. In the morning by the way, a cup of lavender tea has the opposite effect, which is alike peppermint a stimulating and inspiring effect. If you drink a cup of lavender tea in the morning, you therefore will be more receptive for new things. If the negotiation contrary to your expectations does not run well, even after the negotiation the embrocation of lavender oil, e.g. on the forehead, can reduce headache and inflammation. A fast recreation from hard negotiations is of course good, because after the negotiation is before the negotiation. The last topic in this chapter that I would like to think about is who we think that we negotiate with. It is of course important to know which character is in front of us with which history, experience, and frame. I think to understand this topic better, it might be best to talk to Picasso, who is one of the most famous and successful painters of modern times.
64
43
F. Schupp
Picasso’s Ability to Paint the Psychopathology of Humans
Most of the people know Pablo Picasso and some of his works. Of course, each individual sees different things in pieces of art including the art and here especially the paintings of Pablo Picasso. Being a medical doctor, Fox (2004) has focused on a specific aspect in this regard and outlined in a precise way, how Picasso captured his vis-à-vis. Pablo Picasso recognized and captured the people he painted in an intuitive and impartial way. As in the discussion many critics describe Picasso as a man with a destructive view on people, the critics overlook that Picasso captured his vis-à-vis in their personality or like a medical doctor would say in their psychopathology. Picasso recognized and captured the personalities in a diagnostic way and this by the way most of the times out of his memory. He once said, ‘I do not search for something, I find it’. He finds in the portraits of his objects in a visionary way their mental state and psychological sensitivities. He finds the dreadful face of war without having had to experience war itself, he finds joie de vivre, flowering beauty, blank sexuality, surrealistic sublimated erotic attraction, and he finds irony and comic. In his own personality, he finds self-confident, hopeful expectations and helpless, desperate emptiness. In this sense, Picasso did not paint destructiveness; he incorporated the form, shape, and figure of the world. As an example, he painted Gertrude Stein in 1906 (Souhami 1998) as a reflected woman in her Middle Ages. But, at the time when he painted her, she was a vivid, young woman. When asked about that he did not paint her in a precise way, he answered ‘This does not matter. She will look like this on day’. Photo portraits 30 years later showed that he was right. There are numerous examples in his relationships with partners where he anticipated state or portraited emotions that were not visible to others at that moment. One painting that most of us know is the portrait of his first wife Olga in 1935. Picasso was not primarily interested in the psychopathology of his vis-à-vis; he was interested in the human condition, in the current state always including a certain self-reference. Even when painting war ‘Krieg’ (1951) with the help of Dora Maar, his paramour at the time, he gave the war a face, an identity that could be indicted (Kahnweiler 1968). In his self-portraits of 1972, he even painted his own vanity coming out of his artistic genesis. Picasso does not search for something; he finds it, he finds people and tells about them, but always also includes himself and the effect on himself (Giraudy 1986). In this regard, he is an engaged, non-illusionary, beloved, and brutal impersonator of the human condition (Ludwig 1950). In our context, Pablo Picasso would be a very good purchaser, as one decisive key to success in purchasing is the ability to read people.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
44
65
Conclusion
This chapter has tried to touch some aspects that potentially influence purchasing in a natural way. Of course, the core task in purchasing remains to create and to enhance competition in order to achieve optimal results taking into account the rules of economics. In my personal experience, numerous elements of nature have an enormous presence in daily purchasing life and impact the results. Our decision making is strongly influenced by our human behaviour or in other words by our natural behaviour.
References Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2002). Category activation effects in judgement and behavior: The moderating role of perceived comparability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 123– 138. Acerbi, A., Lampos, V., Garnett, P., & Bentley, R. A. (2013). The Expression of emotions in 20th century books. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59030. Aloe, L. (2004). Rita levi-montalcini: The discovery of nerve growth factor and modern neurobiology. Trends in Cell Biology, 14(7), 359–399. Addessi, E., Bellagamba, F., Delfino, A., De Petrillo, F., Focaroli, V., Macchitella, L., et al. (2014). Waiting by mistake: symbolic representation of rewards modulates intertemporal choice in capuchin monkeys, preschool children and adult humans. Cognition, 130(3), 428– 441. Addessi, E., Beran, M., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Brosnan, S., & Leca, J.-B. (2020). Are the roots of human economic systems shared with non-human primates? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 109, 1–15. Addessi, E., Crescimbene, L., & Visalberghi, E. (2007). Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 2579–2585. Addessi, E., Mancini, A., Crescimbene, L., Padoa-Schioppa, C., & Visalberghi, E. (2008). Preference transitivity and symbolic representation in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). PLos ONE, 3(6), e2414. Addessi, E., Paglieri, F., & Focaroli, V. (2011). The ecological rationality of delay tolerance: Insights from capuchin monkeys. Cognition, 199, 142–147. Addessi, E., & Rossi, S. (2010). Tokens improve capuchin performance in the reverse-reward contingency task. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 849–854. Ahne, P. (2017). Wölfe. In J. Schalansky (Ed.), Naturkunden; Naturkunden No. 27 (2nd ed.). Berlin: Matthes & Seitz. Altenmüller, E., & Kopiez, R. (2012). Ein Beitrag zum evolutionären Ursprung der Musik: Was kann uns die Gänsehaut lehren. In Braunschweigische Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft (Ed.), Jahrbuch 2011 (pp. 133–152). Braunschweig: J. Cramer Verlag. Altenmüller, E., & Kopiez, R. (2005). Zur Neurobiologie der durch Musik ausgelösten Emotionen. In Musik: gehört, gesehen und erlebt, IfMpF-Mobographie (Nr. 12, pp. 160–179). Amasino, D. R., Sullivan, N. J., Kranton, R. E., & Huettel, S. A. (2019). Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice. Nature Human Behaviour. Anderl, S. (2018, April 1). Die Vermessung der Wissenschaften. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Frankfurt am Main. Aubert, V. (1965). The hidden society. New York: Bedminster Press. Auersperg, A. M. I., Laumer, I. B., & Bugnyar, T. (2013). Goffin cockatoos wait for qualitative and quantitative gains but prefer ‘better’ to ‘more’. Biology Letters, 9(3), 2013.
66
F. Schupp
Auersperg, A. M. I., van Horik, J. O., Bugnyar, T., Kacelnik, A., Emery, N. J., & von Bayern, A. M. P. (2015). Combinatory actions during object play in Psittaciformes (Diopsittaca nobilis, Pioites melanocephala, Cacatua goffini) and corvids (Corvus corax, Corvus monedula, Corvus moneduloides. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 129(1), 62–71. Baek, S. K., Minnhagen, P., & Kim, B. J. (2011a). The ten thousand Kims. New Journal of Physics, 13, 073036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073036, preprint at arXiv:1109.6221. Baek, S. K., Bernhardsson, S., & Minnhagen, P. (2011b). Zipf’s law unzipped. New Journal of Physics, 04. Bagusche, F. (2019). Das blaue wunder. München: Ludwig Buchverlag. Barber, S. J., Harris, C., & Rajaram, S. (2014). Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: Multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory. Journal if Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 41(2), 2014. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. Barnett, S. A. (1958). Experiments on ‘Neophobia’ in Wild and Laboratory Rats. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 195–201. Barros-Loscertales, A., Gonzalez, J., Pulvermüller, F., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J. C., Costumero, V., et al. (2012). Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2554–2563. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281–1289. Bartens, W. (2018, July 4). Lust auf Luxus – Testosteron befeuert Nachfrage nach Statussymbolen. Süddeutsche Zeitung, Medizin, München. Bastian, B., Koval, P., Erbas, Y., Houben, M., Pe, M., Kuppens, P. (2015). Sad and alone: Social expectancies for experiencing negative emotions are linked to feelings of loneliness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 51. Bastian, B., Kuppens, P., Hornsey, M. J., & Park, J. (2011). Feeling bad about being sad: The role of social expectancies in amplifying negative mood. Emotion, 12(1), 69–80. Bednekoff, P. A. (2007). Allocation of foraging efforts when danger varies over time. In D. W. Stephens, & J. S. Brown, & R. C. Ydenberg (Eds.) Foraging (pp. 305–329). The University of Chicago Press. Bellos, A. (2010, October 4). Alex’s adventures in numberland; Bloomsbury paperbacks. London 2010; referred to in: Warum wir so oft automatisch die Zahl 7 wählen. Welt, Axel Springer, Berlin. Beran, M. J., & Evans, T. A. (2006). Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): The effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals. Behavioral Processes, 73, 315–324. Bickel, W. K., Koffernus, M. N., Moody, L., & Wilson, A. G. (2014). The behavioral and neuro-economic process of temporal discounting: A candidate behavioral marker of addiction. Neuropharmacology, 76, 518–527. Blawat, K. (2013, June 4). Die Chemie der Monogamie; in: Süddeutsche Zeitung, München. Blawat, K. (2016, August 29). Mut zur Kultur; in: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 199, München. Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 11818–11823. Bodderas, E. (2015, October 12). Warum Zwangsehen bei Zebrafinken schlecht enden. Welt, Axel Springer, Berlin. Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzees and human cultures. Current Anthropology, 39 (5), 591–614.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
67
Boogert, N. J., Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2006). The relation between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. Animal Behavior, 72(6), 1229–1239. Bosch, O. J., Nair, H. P., Ahern, T. H., Neumann, I. D., & Young, L. J. (2009). The CRF system mediates increased passive stress-coping behavior following the loss of a bonded partner in a monogamous rodent. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34(6), 1406–1415. Bosch, O. J., & Young, L. J. (2017). Oxytocin and social relationships: From attachment to bond disruption. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Brafman, O., & Brafman, R. (2010). Click—The forces behind how we fully engage with people, work, and everything we do Crown publishing group. New York: Random House, Inc. Brafman, O., & Brafman, R. (2013). Auf Anhieb sympathisch. Psychologie heute compact, 34, 32–39. Braun, M. (2011, May 24). Amazonas-Volk lebt ohne Uhr und Kalender. Welt, Axel Springer, Berlin. Breckwoldt, M., von Luckner, F. (2012). Lavendel: Duft und Sinnlichkeit im Garten; BLV. Brosnan, S. F., de Waal, F. B. M. (2004). A concept of value during experimental exchange in brown capuchin monkeys. Cebus apella Folia Primatologica, 75 (5), pp 317–330. Bruderer Enzler, H., Diekmann, A., & Meyer, R. (2014). Subjective discount rates in the general population and their predictive power for energy saving behavior. Energy Policy, 65, 524–540. Brugger, P. (2001). From haunted brain to haunted science: A cognitive neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought. In J. Houran, & R. Lange (Eds.), Hauntings and poltergeist: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 195–213).McFarland. Buck, J., & Buck, E. (1968). Mechanism of rhythmic synchronous flashing of fireflies. Science, 159, 1319–1327. Buck, J., & Buck, E. (1978). Toward a functional interpretation of synchronous flashing by fireflies. The American Naturalist, 112(985), 471–492. Bulley, A., & Pepper, G. V. (2017). Cross-country relationships between life expectancy, intertemporal choice and age at first birth. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 652–658. CAPS. (2019). Ways to find new suppliers; CAPS Research; Tempe, AZ; CAPS Stats September 2019. Catchpole, C. K., & Slater, P. J. B. (2008). Bird song: Biological themes and variations (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal Experimental Psychology Learning Memory Cognition, 22, 771–791. Chiarati, E., Canestrari, D., Vera, R., & Baglione, V. (2012). Subordinates benefit from exploratory dominants: Response to novel food in cooperatively breeding carrion crows. Animal Behavior, 83(1), 103–109. Clauset, A., Larremore, D. B., & Sinatra, R. (2017). Data-driven prediction in the science of science. Science, 355(6324), 477–480. Danel, S., Osiurak, F., & von Bayern, A. M. P. (2017). From the age of 5 humans decide economically, whereas crows exhibit individual preferences. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 2017. Dambeck, H. (2016, March 26). So fühlt sich eine 100 an. Spiegel Online, Hamburg. Davis, S. J., Vale, G. L., Schapiro, S. J., Lambeth, S. P., & Whiten, A. (2016). Foundations of cumulative culture in apes: Improved foraging efficiency through relinquishing and combining witnessed behaviors in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Scientific Reports, 6(35953), 2016. Davies, M., & Pelé, A. -F. (2019). Neuromorphic Revolution to start in 2024. Europe: EETimes. Davies, M., Srinivasa, N., Lin, T.-H., Chinya, G., Cao, Y., Choday, S. H., et al. (2018). Loihi: A neuromorphic manycore processor with on-chip learning. IEEE Micro, 38(1), 82–99. Dean, L. G., Kendal, R. L., Schapiro, S. J., Thierry, B., & Laland, K. N. (2012). Identification of the social and cognitive process underlying human cumulative culture. Science, 335(6072), 1114–1118. DePasquale, C., Neuberger, T., Hirrlinger, A. M., & Braithwaite, V. A. (2016). The influence of complex and threatening environments in early life on brain size and behavior. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1823), 2016.
68
F. Schupp
Derryberry, E. P. (2007). Evolution of bird song affects signal efficacy: An experimental test using historical and current signals. Evolution, 61(8), 1938–1945. Desai, R., Binder, J., Contant, L., & Seidenberg, M. (2010). Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 20(2), 468–478. De Solla Price, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press. Ditz, H. M., & Nieder, A. (2016). Numerosity representations in crows obey the Weber-Fechner law. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283. Drapier, M., Chauvin, C., Dufour, V., Uhlrich, P., & Thierry, B. (2005). Food-exchange with humans in brown capuchin monkeys. Primates, 46(4), 241–248. Dufour, V., Pelé, M., Sterck, E. H. M., & Thierry, B. (2007). Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) anticipation of food return: Coping with waiting time in an exchange task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121(2), 145–155. Dufour, V., Wascher, C. A. F., Braun, A., Miller, R., & Bugnyar, T. (2011). Corvids can decide if a future exchange is worth waiting for. Biology Letters, 8(2), 201–204. Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon and Schuster. Emanuele, E., Politi, P., Bianchi, M., Minoretti, P., Bertona, M., & Geroldi, D. (2006). Raised plasma nerve growth factor levels associated with early-stage romantic love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31(3), 288–294. Evans, T. A., & Westergaard, G. C. (2006). Self-control and tool use in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(2), 163–166. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulated the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402. Feierabend, S., Plankenhorn, T., & Rathgeb, T. (2017). JIM-Studie 2017: Jugend, Information, (Multi-)Media; Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (mpfs); Stuttgart. Ferreira, C. M., Nagelkerken, I., Goldenberg, S. U., & Connell, S. D. (2018). CO2 emissions boost the benefits of crop production by farming damselfish. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(8), 1223–1226. Filosa, A., Barker, A. J., Dal Maschio, M., & Baier, H. (2016). Feeding state modulates behavioral choice and processing of prey stimuli in zebrafish tectum. Neuron, 90(3), 596–608. Flexner, A. (1939). The usefulness of useless knowledge. Harper’s Magazine, 179, 544–552. Flynn, F. J., & Adams, G. (2009). Money can’t buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 404–409. Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Börner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojevic, S., et al. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), 2018. Fox, J. M. (2004). Pablo Picasso, eine Wissenschaft vom Menschen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 101 (36), 2004. Fox, R. A., & Millam, J. R. (2004). The effect of early environment on neophobia in orange-winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 89 (1–2), 117–129. Gage, F. H., Coates, P. W., Palmer, T. D., Kuhn, H. G., Fisher, L. J., Suhonen, J. O., et al. (1995). Survival and differentiation of adult neuronal progenitor cells transplanted to the adult brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92(25), 11879–11883. Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., et al. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336. Ganteför, G. (2018). Das Gesetz der Herde. Edition Zeitblende, AT Verlag; Aarau and Munich. Genty, E., & Roeder, J.-J. (2006). Self-control: Why should sea lions, Zalophus californianus, perform better than primates? Animal Behavior, 72(6), 1241–1247. Gesundheit. (2018). Die Kraft der Klänge. Gesundheit aktuell, 03/2018; pp. 6–9; UKV; Saarbrücken.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
69
Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: the affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 503–514. Gino, F., & Flynn, J. F. (2011). Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 915–922. Giraldeau, L. A., Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J. (2002). Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 357(1427), 1559–1566. Giraudy, D. (1986). Pablo Picasso—Die Bilanz eines schöpferischen Lebens. Stuttgart: Zürich. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press. Greenberg, R., & Mettke-Hofmann, C. (2001). Ecological aspects of neophobia and neophilia in birds. Current Ornithology, 16, 119–178. Grill, G., Lehner, B., Thieme, M., Geenen, B., Tickner, D., Antonelli, F., et al. (2019). Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature, 569, 215–221. Grimaud, H. (2013). Retour à Salem. Albin Michel. Grippo, A. J., Gerena, D., Huang, J., Kumar, N., Shah, M., Ughreja, R., et al. (2007). Social isolation induces behavioral and neuroendocrine disturbances relevant to depression in female and male prairie voles. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32(8–10), 966–980. Grippo, A. J., Carter, C. S., McNeal, N., Chandler, D. L., Larocca, M. A., Bates, S. L., et al. (2011). 24 hour autonomic dysfunction and depressive behaviors in animal model of social isolation: implications for the study of depression and cardiovascular disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 73(1), 59–66. Guillette, L. M., Reddon, A. R., Hurd, P. L., & Sturdy, C. B. (2009). Exploration of a novel space is associated with individual differences in learning speed in black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. Behavioural Processes, 82(3), 265–270. Guillette, L. M., Hahn, A. H., Hoeschele, M., Przyslupski, A. M., & Sturdy, C. B. (2014). Individual differences in learning speed, performance accuracy and exploratory behavior in black-capped chickadees. Animal Cognition, 18(1), 165–178. Hackenberg, T. (2009). Token reinforcement: A review and analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91(2), 257–286. Haidle, M. N., Bolus, M., Collard, M., Conard, N., Garafoli, D., Lombard, M., et al. (2015). The nature of culture: an eight-grade model for the evolution and expansion of cultural capacities in hominins and other animals. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 93, 43–70. Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 329–340. Harford, T. (2016): Messy, the power of disorder to transform our lives; Riverhead Books; 2016. Harmand, S., Lewis, J. E., Feibel, C. S., Lepre, C. J., Prat, S., Lenoble, A., et al. (2015). 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya. Nature, 521, 310– 315. Hartbauer, M., Haitzinger, L., Kainz, M., & Römer, H. (2014). Competition and cooperation in a synchronous bushcricket chorus. Royal Society Open Science, 1(2), 1–17. Hartbauer, M., & Römer, H. (2016). Rhythm generation and rhythm perception in insects: The evolution of synchronous choruses. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10(286), 2016. Hauk, D. O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). (2004): Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 191–201. Hawks, J. (2019). Still evolving—For 30,000 years our species has been changing remarkably quickly. And we’re not there yet, Scientific American, Special edition, 104–109. Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(3–4), 172–198. Heinrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Herrmann, S. (2013, June 28). Warum sich Menschen ihren Beziehungsstatus schönreden. Süddeutsche Zeitung, München.
70
F. Schupp
Herrmann, S. (2015, February 9). Melancholie unerwünscht. Süddeutsche Zeitung, München. Herrmann, S. (2018, July 3). Hitparade der Hybris; Forscher messen das Selbstwertgefühl einzelner Nationen. Süddeutsche Zeitung, München. Hillemann, F., Bugnyar, T., Kotrschal, K., & Wascher, C. A. F. (2014). Waiting for better, not for more: Corvids respond to quality in two delay maintenance tasks. Animal Behavior, 90, 1–10. Ihle, M., Kempenaers, B., & Forstmeier, W. (2015). Fitness benefits of mate choice for compatibility in a socially monogamous species. PLoS Biology, 13(9), 1–21. IPSERA. (2018). Proceedings of the International Purchasing and Supply Education and Research Association 2018 conference, Athens, March 25–28, 2018. IPSERA. (2019). Book of abstracts. In International Purchasing and Supply Education and Research Association 2019 conference, Politecnico Milano, April 14–17, 2019. Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve jobs: The exclusive biography. New York: Simon & Schuster. Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition, 106(3), 1221– 1247. James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in preliterate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 32–42. Jimura, K., Myerson, J., Hilgard, J., Keighley, J., Braver, T. S., & Green, L. (2011). Domain independence and stability in young and older adults’ discounting of delayed rewards. Behavioral Processes, 87, 253–259. Judge, P. G., & Essler, J. L. (2013). Capuchin monkeys exercise self-control by choosing token exchange over an immediate reward. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 26, 256–266. Kabadayi, C., Taylor, L. A., von Bayern, A. M. P., Osvath, M., & Ravens, M. (2016). Ravens, new caledonian crows and jackdaws parallel great apes in motor self-regulation despite smaller brains. Royal Society Open Science, 111(4), 2140–2148. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London, England: Penguin Books. Kahnweiler, D. -H. (1968). Guernica 1956 (pp.118). Köln: Ästhetische Betrachtungen. Kalenscher, T., & van Wingerden, M. (2011). Why we should use animals to study economic decision making—A perspective. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5(82), 1–11. Kant, I. (1787). Critik der reinen Vernunft; Johann Freidrich Hartknoch; Riga 1787. Stuttgart: Reclam. Kaube, J. (2014, September 14). Intime Verhältnisse: Wie lernt man, was im Verborgenen stattfindet; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Frankfurt am Main. Kempermann, G., Gast, D., & Gage, F. H. (2002). Neuroplasticity in old age: sustained fivefold induction of hippocampal neurogenesis by long-term environmental enrichment. Annals of Neurology, 52(2), 135–143. Kiet, H. A. T., Baek, S. K., Jeong, H., & Kim, B. J. (2008). Korean family name distribution in the past. Journal of Korean Physical Society, 51. Killingsworth, M. A., Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932. Koelsch, S. (2010). Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 131–137. Koelsch, S. (2012). Brain and music. UK: Wiley-Blackwell; John Wiley & Sons; Chichester. Koepke, A. E., Gray, S. L., & Pepperberg, I. M. (2015). Delayed gratification: A grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) will wait for a better reward. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 129(4), 339–346. Kranz, G. (2016). Aktuelle Erkenntnisse zur Neuroplastizität; Der Merkurstab. Journal of Anthroposophic Medicine, 69(5). Krasheninnikova, A., Höner, F., O’Neill, L., Penna, E., & von Bayern, A. M. P. (2018). Economic decision-making in parrots. Scientific Reports, 8(12537), 1–10. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
71
Kubovy, M., & Psotka, J. (1976). The predominance of seven and the apparent spontaneity of numerical choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(2), 291–294. Kuchler, B., Beher, S. (2014). Soziologie der Liebe. Romantische Beziehungen in theoretischer Perspektive; Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books. Laland, K. N. (2004). Social learning strategies. Animal Learning & Behavior, 32(1), 4–14. Laland, K. N., & Janik, V. M. (2006). The animal cultures debate. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(10), 542–547. Larsch, J., & Baier, H. (2018). Biological motion as an innate perceptual mechanism driving social affiliation. Current Biology, 28, 3523–3532. Laurin, K., Kille, D. R., & Eibach, R. P. (2013). The way I am is the way you ought to be: Perceiving one’s relational status as unchangeable motivates normative idealization of that status. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1523–1532. Leadbeater, E., & Chittka, L. (2007). Social learning in insects—from miniature brains to consensus building. Current Biology, 17(16), 703–713. Lee, R. J., & Cohen, N. A. (2016). How bitter taste receptors defend the body against bacteria. Scientific American, 314(2), 38–43. Lembke, G. (2016). Im digitalen Hamsterrad. Heidelberg: medhochzwei Verlag. Lembke, G. (2019). Verzockte Zukunft, wie wir das Potenzial der jungen Generation verspielen. Weinheim Basel: Beltz. Lempert, K. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2015). The malleability of intertemporal choice. Trends of Cognitive Science, 20, 64–74. Leonardi, R. J., Vick, S.-J., & Dufour, V. (2012). Waiting for more: The performance of domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) on exchange tasks. Animal Cognition, 15(1), 107–120. Lepousez, G., Nissant, A., & Lledo, P. M. (2015). Adult neurogenesis and the future of the rejuvenating brain circuits. Neuron, 86(2), 387–401. Levi-Montalcini, R., & Angeletti, R. (1968). Nerve growth factor. Physiological Review, 48(3), 534–568. Lewin, K. (1931). Der Übergang von der aristotelischen zur galileischen Denkweise in Biologie und Psychologie. Zeitschrift Erkenntnis, Band 1; S. 421–466; Berlin 1931; digitalized version by Hoffmann, T. (2001): Lewin, K. (1981); Werkausgabe Band 1: Wissenschaftstheorie I; Graumann, C.-F. (Hrsg.); Huber/Klett-Cotta; S. 233-278; Bern/Stuttgart 1981. Liévin-Bazin, A., Pineaux, M., Clerc, O., Gahr, M., von Bayern, A. M. P., & Bovet, D. (2018). Emotional responses to conspecific distress calls are modulated by affiliation in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus). PLoS ONE, 13(10), 2018. Longcamp, M., Velay, J. -L., Wise Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2016). Neuroanatomy of handwriting and related reading and writing skills in adults and children with and without learning disabilities: French-American connections. Pratiques: Linguistique, littérature, didactique, 171–172, 1–11. Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M.-T., & Velay, J.-L. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: a comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119(1), 67–79. Ludwig, P. (1950). Das Menschenbild Picassos als Ausdruck eines generationsmäßig bedingten Lebensgefühls. Mainz: Inauguraldissertation. Lück, H. E. (1996). Die Feldtheorie und Kurt Lewin. Weinheim: Eine Einführung; Psychologie Verlags Union. Luther, D. M. (1545). Evangelische Deutsche Original-Bibel. Evangelische Deutsche Original-Bibel; Fromman, Züllichau 1740, 1741. Ly, M., Haynes, M. R., Barter, J. W., Weinberger, D. R., & Zink, C. F. (2011). Subjective socioeconomic status predicts human ventral striatal responses to social status information. Current Biology, 21, 794–797.
72
F. Schupp
Markham, J. (2019). On neuromorphic processors. In A. Pressmann (Ed.), Intel gains first big corporate partners for brain computing push, Tech–Intel, 18.11.2019. fortune.com. Marshall-Pescini, S., & Whiten, S. (2008). Social learning of nut-cracking behavior in East African Sanctuary-Living Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 122(2), 186–194. Martin, S. (2016). Total recall: Business Life; British Airways; 12/2016 and 01/2017, p. 52. Cedar Communications Limited. Martin, S., Goldstein, N., & Cialdini, R. B. (2014). The small big: Small changes that spark big influence. London: Profile Books. Martin-Jung, H. (2018, April 17). Die haben Nerven. Süddeutsche Zeitung; Gehirnforschung, München. Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgement: Lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule-based analysis. Psychological Science, 19, 255–260. Matlock, T. (2004). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory and Cognition, 32(8), 1389– 1400. McGrew, W. C. (1992). Chimpanzee material culture: Implications for human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mech, D. (1999). Alpha status, dominance and division of labor in wolf packs. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77. Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2017). What’s the use of handwriting: A white paper. Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2014). Handwriting automaticity: the search for performance thresholds. Language and Education, 28(1), 34–51. Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. D. (2012). Time discounting predicts creditworthiness. Psychological Science, 23, 56–58. Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Moving through time. Psychological Science, 12(2), 222–223. Milojevic, S. (2015). Quantifying the cognitive extent of science. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 962–973. Moiseff, A., & Copeland, J. (2010). Firefly synchrony: A behavioural strategy to minimize visual clutter. Science, 329(5988), 181. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190421 . Maritz, P. (2005). Sir Thomas Muir, 1844–1934. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 411, 3–67. Murnighan, K., & Conlon, D. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 165–186. Nave, G., Nadler, A., Dubois, D., Zava, D., Camerer, C., & Plassmann, H. (2018). Single-dose testosterone administration increases men’s preference for status goods. Nature Communications, 9(2433), 2018. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielmann, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211. Nieder, A., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32(1), 185–208. Noë, R., van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., & Hammerstein, P. (2001). Economics in nature: Social dilemmas, mate choice and biological markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science, 280(5485), 1773–1775. O’Hara, M., Mioduszewska, B., von Bayern, A. M. P., Auersperg, A. M. I., Bugnyar, T., Wilkinson, A., et al. (2017). The temporal dependence of exploration on noetic style in birds. Scientific Reports, 7(4742), 2017. Osiurak, F., Morgado, N., Vallet, G. T., Drot, M., & Palluel-Germain, R. (2014). Getting a tool gives wings: Overestimation of tool-related benefits in a motor imagery task and a decision task. Psychological Research, 78(1), 1–9.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
73
Pal, R., Singh, S. N., Chatterjee, A., & Saha, M. (2014). Age-related changes in cardiovascular system, autonomic functions, and levels of BDNF of healthy active males: Role of yogic practice. Age, 36(4), 2014. Plassmann, H. (2018). Interview on Testosterone & brand awareness: Men shop differently when their juices are flowing. How testosterone influences men’s preference for luxury products. INSEAD Knowledge; Marketing, 03.07.2018. Pohl, T. T., Young, L. J., & Bosch, O. J. (2018). Lost connections: Oxytocin and the neural, physiological, and behavioral consequences of disrupted relationships. Journal of Psychophysiology. Poundstone, W. (2015). How to predict the unpredictable. London: Oneworld Publications. Rae, T. C. (Ed.) (2010). Professor Andrew Whiten: Osman Hill Memorial Lecturer 2010; PSGB Winter Meeting. Primate Eye; Primate Society of Great Britain, 102. Rajaram, S. (2011). Collaboration both hurts and helps memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 76–81. Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2010). Collaborative memory: Cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 649–663. Reiniger, R. (1923). Kant—Seine Anhänger und seine Gegner. München: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag. Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (6), 1236–1256. Riechelmann, C. (2016, February, 21). Die Songs der Dachsammer. Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, Frankfurt am Main. Rietz, F., Stannarius, R. (2008). On the brink of jamming: Granular convection in densely filled containers. Physical Review Letters, 100(7). Rosato, A., Strandburg, K. J., Prinz, F., & Swendsen, R. H. (1987). Why the Brazil Nuts are on top: Size segregation of particulate matter by shaking. Physical Review Letters, 58(10), 1038– 1041. Rother, M. (2016, November 25). Handy macht Jugendliche unsozial. Augsburger Allgemeine, Augsburg. Rueschemeyer, S. A., Van Rooji, D., Lindemann, O., Willems, R. M., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The function of words: Distinct neural correlates for words dentoing differently manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1844–1851. Schupp, J. (1964). Die freie Reichsstadt Pfullendorf und ihre Geschichte. Stadt Pfullendorf, Pfullendorf/Baden. Schupp, F. (2004). Versorgungsstrategien in der Logistik. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag. Semaw, S., Rogers, M. J., Quade, J., Renne, P. R., Butler, R. F., Dominquez-Rodrigo, M., et al. (2003). 2.6-million-year-old stone tools and associated bones from OGS-6 and OGS-7, Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution, 45(2), 169–177. Semmelhack, J. L., Donovan, J. C., Thiele, T. R., Kuehn, E., Laurell, E., & Baier, H. (2014). A dedicated visual pathway for prey detection in larval zebra-fish. eLife, 3, 1–19. Sinha, C. (2011). When time is not space. The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3(1), 137–169. Sip. (2014). Die Kraft des Lavendels. Die Welt am Sonntag, 37, Berlin: Axel Springer. Souhami, D. (1998). Gertrude Stein und Alice B. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag. Spitzer, M. (2003). Selbstbestimmen: Gehirnforschung und die Frage: Was sollen wir tun?. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movement in absent objects. Psychological Research, 65(4), 235–241. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672. Stiglitz, J. E. (1993). Economics (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
74
F. Schupp
Story, G. W., Vlaev, I., Seymour, B., Darzi, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Does temporal discounting explain unhealthy behavior? A systematic review and reinforcement learning perspective. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 76. Stout, D. (2011). Stone toolmaking and the evolution of human culture and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366 (1567), 1050–1059. Strang, S., Hoeber, C., Uhl, O., Koletzko, B., Münte, T. F., Lehnert, H., et al. (2017). Impact of nutrition on social decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unites States of America, 114(25), 6510–6514. Sun, Q. Q. (2007). The missing piece in the ‘use it or lose it’ puzzle: Is inhibition regulated by activity or does it act in its own record. Review in the Neurosciences, 18(3–4), 295–310. Sunnafrank, M. (1992). On debunking the attitude similarity myth. Communication Monographs, 59(2), 164–179. Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1528), 2405–2415. Taylor, A. H., Hunt, G. R., Holzhaider, J. C., & Gray, R. D. (2007). Spontaneous metatool use by New Caledonian crows. Current Biology, 17(17), 1504–1507. Tebbich, S., Taborsky, M., Fessl, B., & Dvorak, M. (2002). The ecology of tool-use in the woodpecker finch (Cactospiza pallida. Ecology Letters, 5, 654–664. Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., et al. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 273–281. Thomas, J.A., & Birney, E. C. (1979). Parental care and mating system of the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 5(2), 171–186. Tsukayama, E., & Duckworth, A. L. (2010). Domain-specific temporal discounting and temptation. Judgement Decision Making, 5, 72–82. Tüpker., R. (2005). Die therapeutische Nutzung von Musik: Musiktherapie. In De la Motte, H., & Rötter, G. (Eds.), Musikpsychologie (pp. 339–356), Laaber. Urban, M. (2011, May 25). Wo keine letzte Gewissheit zu haben ist. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 119, München. Velay, J. -L., Longcamp, M. (2012). Handwriting versus typewriting: Behavioural and cerebral consequences in letter recognition. Learning to Write Effectively: Current Trends in European Research (pp. 371–373). Brill. Vick, S.-J., Bovet, D., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). How do African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) perform on a delay of gratification task? Animal Cognition, 13(2), 351–358. Vincenot, C. E. (2018). How new concepts become universal scientific approaches: insights form citation network analysis of agent-based complex systems science. In Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (pp. 285). Von Liebig, J., Poggendorf, J. C., Wöhler, Fr. (1858). Handwörterbuch der reinen und angewandten Chemie (pp. 727 and pp 740). Braunschweig: Friedrich Viehweg und Sohn. Wang, H., Duclot, F., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., & Kabbaj, M. (2013). Histone deacetylase inhibitors facilitate partner preference formation in female prairie voles. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 919– 924. Wascher, C. A. F., Dufour, V., & Bugnyar, T. (2012). Carrion crows cannot overcome impulsive choice in a quantitative exchange task. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(118), 1–6. Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W. W. Norton. Weber C. (2011, July 28). Zehntausend Kims. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 172, München. Wehling, E. (2016). Politisches Framing, Wie eine Nation sich ihr Denken einredet – und daraus Politik macht; edition medienpraxis, 14. Köln: Halem Verlag. Whiten, A. (2005). The second inheritance system of chimpanzees and humans. Nature, 437 (7055), 52–55.
Elements of Purchasing in Nature
75
Whiten, A. (2011). The scope of culture in chimpanzees, humans and ancestral apes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0334. Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., et al. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399(6737), 682–685. Whiten, A., Hinde, R. A., Laland, K. N., & Stringer, C. B. (2011). Culture evolves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Science, 366(1567), 938–948. Whiten, A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). The evolution of animal ‘cultures’ and social intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 603–620. Whiten, A., Watson, S. K. (2018). Illuminating the evolution of cultural cognition through comparative studies of humans and chimpanzees. In Proceedings of the 31st International Congress of Psychology. K. Shigemasu, S. Kuwano, Sato, & T. Matsuzawa (Eds.), Diversity in harmony—Insights from psychology (pp. 164–187). International Union of Psychological Science. Whiten, A. (2017). Culture in child and chimpanzee. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 2017. Wickert, J. (1972). (1972): Einstein. Reinbeck: Rowohlt. Winkler, H., & Leisler, B. (1999). Exploration and curiosity in birds: Functions and mechanisms. In N. J. Adams, & R. H. Slotow (Eds.), 22nd International Ornithological Congress, Durban. Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition, 105(1), 229–236. Zaromb, F. M., Liu, J. H., Paez, D., Hanke, K., Putnam, A., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2018). We made history: Citizens of 35 countries overestimate their nation’s role in world history. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(4), 521–528. Zeigarnik, B. (1927). Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen. In K. Lewin (Hrsg.) (Ed.), Untersuchungen zur Handlungs- und Affektpsychologie; III. Psychologische Forschung, Band 9, Berlin. Zeilinger, A. (2001). Es stellt sich letztlich heraus, dass Information ein wesentlicher Grundbestandteil der Welt ist; interview with A. Zeilinger by A. Naica-Loebell. https:// heise.de/-3448658. Zeilinger, A. (2003). Einsteins Schleier—Die neue Welt der Quantenphysik. München: Beck Verlag. Zimen, E. (2003). Der Wolf: Verhalten, Ökologie. Kosmos: Mythos. Zink, C. F., Tong, Y., Chen, Q., Bassett, D. S., Stein, J. L., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2008). Know your place: Neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron, 58(2), 273–283. Zittlau, J. (2016, May 22). Bitter macht stark. Berlin: Welt, Axel Springer. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shape of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PLoS ONE, 7(12), 2012.
76
F. Schupp Prof. Dr.-Ing. Florian Schupp works as Senior Vice President Purchasing & Supplier Management Automotive OEM at the Schaeffler Group, Germany. He completed his Ph.D. at the Technical University of Berlin in the field of strategy development in purchasing and logistics and has 21 years of purchasing experience in the companies Schaeffler, Continental, Siemens and SONY. He integrates practical purchasing and supply management work with academic research together with the University of Lappeenranta, Finland; the University of Catania, Italy; the Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry, France; the Technical University Berlin, Germany; and the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany. He teaches Purchasing and Supply Management in Bremen and Berlin. Main research interests are purchasing strategy, behavioral aspects in purchasing, purchasing in nature and supplier innovation. Schupp is member of the Advisory Board of BLG Logistics, Bremen, Germany and the Advisory Board of Xtronic, Böblingen, Germany. Since 2019 he is Adjunct Professor for Logistics at the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany.
Upskilling for “Purchasing 4.0” How European Automotive OEMs Master the Future of Purchasing with the Right Skill Set Yasmin Weiß and Sonja Kamm
1
Introduction: Trends in the Automotive Industry
The automotive industry is facing an era of disruptive change. The industry is likely to experience more changes in the next decade than in the last 20 years.1 Intense competition and structural changes characterize the industry. Companies have to transform their core business. The four automotive megatrends mobility, autonomous driving, digitization, and electrification will continue to have a major impact on the automotive industry in the upcoming years with an impact on all company functions. The following Automotive trend radar illustrates in detail how different industry trends are influencing the automotive industry in the short and long term (Fig. 1). Facing those changes, the European automotive industry has to take appropriate measures to defend its global technological leadership. A high focus is put on flexibility as well as on innovation as rapid progress in, for example, autonomous driving, big data analytics, and the Internet of things are creating new opportunities for innovative services, products and therefore business models. Today’s cars already resemble rolling computers on four wheels with their connected services
1
See Miller (2017).
Y. Weiß (&) Nuremberg Institute of Technology, Nuremberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] S. Kamm BMW Group, Munich, Germany e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 F. Schupp and H. Wöhner (eds.), The Nature of Purchasing, Management for Professionals, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_2
77
78
Y. Weiß and S. Kamm Supply base
Competition Rising energy costs
Emerging market investors
OEMs
Rising star OEMs
Outsourcing / Insourcing
Supplier insolvencies New players (hardware & software)
Consolidation Terms & conditions
Car buyers Potential economical downturn
Long-term
Technology Comfort features
Global localisation
Demotorization
New growth regions
Availability of skilled workforce
New mobility concepts
Factor cost inflation
Diesel
Financing
Volatility of capital markets
Emission reduction
Price pressure
Triad stagnation
Industry 4.0 CO2 targets
Volatility of exchange rates
Investors’ and banks’ view on automotive suppliers
Short-term
Fig. 1 Automotive industry trend radar (authors’ own figure, based on Lazard/Roland Berger: Global Automotive Supplier Study 2018)
and driving assistants. Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) have to transform themselves from “hardware” manufacturers into connected mobility solutions providers. As a consequence, present requirements for the workforce change. This article offers an overview and description of the top skills for purchasers of automotive OEMs facing the challenges as described. It is based on many discussions and expert interviews with HR experts as well as purchasing executives of leading automotive companies. This article was designed to answer the most crucial questions: What are overall trends which characterize the purchasing function 4.0? Which skills therefore do purchasers need in order to be successful in the presence and future? How does the qualification profile of a “well-rounded purchaser 4.0” look like to face the challenges of the increasing complexity of the industry? Which special requirements do purchasers need in China as important sourcing location for European OEMs?
2
Overall Trends: How Does Purchasing 4.0 Look Like?
There are five overall trends in terms of key challenges that automotive OEMs need to currently address. They directly or indirectly affect the purchasing function: • Increasing complexity and cost pressure: The overall complexity of the automotive industry has reached a historic peak. The worldwide increase in regulations with respect to environmental and safety standards such as in China and Europe will raise costs and at the same time increase complexity. Additionally, “the growing number of derivatives serving different vehicle segments and markets based on a single platform also raises complexity. At the same time, OEMs have to develop alternative powertrain technologies in order to lower emission” (McKinsey 2013, p. 9). This will require significant investment from all OEMs. Given all these different pressures in combination with a flat net price
Upskilling for “Purchasing 4.0”
79
development, it is more difficult for OEMs to differentiate themselves with new features while extracting economic value from these forces. • Digital demands: Consumers worldwide ask for more connectivity and connected mobility services and ease of use. Customers more and more want to combine mobility with communication and entertainment. This is an opportunity for OEMs, but only if they can figure out how to earn money from this consumer desire. • Shifting industry landscape: As OEMs have to develop alternative powertrain technologies, suppliers will likely provide more of the value-added content per car so that more innovation is shifted toward the suppliers. In addition, different stakeholder groups expect from OEMs to ensure that their suppliers’ production footprints—especially in emerging markets—match future market demands as well as their own production plans. All OEMs have to deal with emerging Chinese competitors entering new segments and markets and which have become serious players. • “Diverse sources of unpredictability: The number of regions witnessing significant changes in their political landscape, rise in terrorism, social tensions, and interstate conflicts reflect a current worldwide instability. Having established a footprint across most major markets” (EY 2017), European OEMs are now being challenged by local volatilities, including stability of trade relations, access to raw materials, foreign exchange, and financial markets with an impact on the OEMs profitability. • Strategic partnerships: As a consequence of the trends mentioned above, building up strategic and sustainable partnerships with external partners will play an increasing role for OEMs. “Coopetition”—a partnership based on cooperation with a competitor—becomes more and more common. The latest partnership between the BMW Group and Daimler on connected mobility services and autonomous driving is a recent example for this. Daimler and BMW are teaming up to develop autonomous driving technology to cut costs and set an industry standard that aims to shape future regulation for self-driving cars. So what are the concrete consequences for the purchasing function of European automotive OEMs? Which transformation has taken place and how is the new role of purchasing defined?
3
The Transformed Role of Purchasing: Upskilling the Workforce
The purchasing function needs to source products and services which provide optimum customer value using the best possible cost structures. In order to achieve this, the purchasing function needs to gain access to supplier innovations, leverage company-wide synergies, and ensure an effective and efficient as well as secured supply chain. The purchasing function contributes to a high degree to an OEM’s
80
Y. Weiß and S. Kamm
product quality and overall profitability. Below we have listed statements concerning the new role of the purchasing function which have been given recurrently in many of our conversations with purchasing executives. They describe the profound transformation process which is currently taking place: • The complexity of the purchasing role is increasing and therefore a higher level of overall qualification is needed. Today’s purchasers need skills that transcend functional mastery; they additionally need comprehensive social and functional skills across the whole value chain. • Managing the relationship with strategic partners and suppliers becomes a more explicit dimension of a purchaser’s job description. Fulfilling short-term as well as long-term objectives is a crucial balance act in the negotiating process and requires a high level of intuition, empathy, and long-term strategic thinking. • Purchasers must be able to cope with growing market volatility and political and economic instabilities increase. Therefore, purchasers must be able to take decisions in an ambiguous and fast-changing environment and must be well informed about current determining factors such as geopolitics which influence the supply chain. • The structure of the supplier portfolio becomes more dynamic and diverse. This affects the direct environment of the purchasing function as well as the whole global supply chain. Also, a higher focus is placed on sustainability issues. Hence, more interdisciplinary and intercultural skills are needed in a purchasing team. • As more and more innovations are bought from suppliers, the purchasing function has to transform from pure “purchasing” to “managing partnerships.” Purchasers must, therefore, better understand the suppliers’ perspective and requirements in order to be able to develop integrative solutions for both sides. Innovative suppliers are seen as strategic partners which have an impact on the negotiating process and strategy. • More and more processes and procedures are digitalized and artificial intelligence (AI) will more and more be able to fulfill selected purchasing tasks. Hence, administrative functions will decrease, and purchasers can more concentrate on strategic jobs such as joint product development with suppliers, identifying new supply markets, and synergy potentials. A purchaser will more and more act as an “ambassador” of a company which requires soft-skills like representing, convincing, conflict solving, and relationship building. • Increased transparency of relevant data and information facilitates a fully automated information flow in the process chain. In order to make use of the huge potential, purchasers need more skills in data analytics. These developments and the transformed role of purchasing make it necessary for OEMs to invest in “upskilling” of their purchasing workforce. So how can the different qualification requirements be identified systematically? Which skills will be needed in the presence and the future? And which mindset helps to cope with the current challenges?
Upskilling for “Purchasing 4.0”
4
81
Top Skills for Purchasers: Which Skill- and Mindset Is Needed?
Being able to master a broad transformation process always requires the right skill- and mindset. The workforce must be able and willing to transform from the former to a new role. Derived from the previously described transformed role of the purchasing function, purchasers more and more act as “intrapreneurs” with increasing degrees of autonomy and responsibility, and a broader perspective across different company functions. For example, when negotiating with suppliers they continuously have to look for the best overall solution for the company—both short term and long term—especially when entering a new strategic partnership with an innovative partner. They very often have to define their individual role and concrete tasks newly as in a digitalized environment there are hardly any blueprints on how to conduct the particular purchasing process. This requires the willingness to adapt, learn, and to understand the need for change. This of course does not happen overnight but requires a continuous learning process in which the following questions need to be asked—both by human resource management (HR Management) and the responsible purchasing executives: How future-proof is the current skill- and mindset of our purchasing team? In which areas do we especially need to invest in order to cope with the new requirements? Which competencies will become more important in the future, which ones will lose importance? What are effective and efficient ways for the workforce to acquire the new skills? Which additional skills for purchasers are needed in specific regions of major importance such as China? The following chapters reflect the major findings of our scientific research work and interviews with purchasing executives.
4.1 Strategic Approach to Identify Skill Needs: Which Are the “Future Hot Skills”? No one learns skills such as data analytics, state-of-the-art negotiating methods or better communications or intercultural skills overnight. It takes time to qualify people or to hire new specialists from the external labor market and integrate them into the existing team and culture. Therefore, it is of major importance to strategically identify the company’s specific “future hot skills,” which should receive special attention as they are characterized by two dimensions: • They will be of high importance in the next years • and are scarce on the internal and external labor market.2 Different HR processes such as recruiting, development, qualification, and retention have to be involved to ensure that the “future hot skills” are available in a sufficient number and quality (Fig. 2). 2
For detailed information about this approach and methodology see Weiß (2017b).
82
Y. Weiß and S. Kamm
Fig. 2 Strategic competency matrix (authors’ own figure)
This strategic skill analyses based on the competency matrix needs to be done individually by every company. However, certain trends seem to be applicable for the majority of OEMs. Our research has shown that for most companies, specific digital skills in • Digital product development, • Digital business • Industry 4.0 or • Advanced analytics in combination with • Profound experience in purchasing represent “future hot skills.” Such skills combinations are highly requested in the new purchasing environment and at the same time relatively scarce.3 Administrative and repetitive purchasing tasks, however, can in the future be more and more 3
For a detailed list of specific digital skills see Strack et al. (2017).
Upskilling for “Purchasing 4.0”
83
replaced by AI solutions and digitized processes. For those jobholders with “risky skills” new fields of application need to be found or they need to be “upskilled” for new tasks. In addition to the “future hot skills,” we have analyzed in our research, which additional skills are needed in order to foster “well-rounded” qualification for purchasing tasks.
5
Successful Purchasers: How Does a “Well-Rounded” Qualification Profile Look like?
The characteristics of purchasing 4.0 with its increased complexity require more comprehensive and generalist qualification profiles of purchasers than ever before. Purchasers need a so-called T-shaped model of their qualification, which reflects deep knowledge in one area on the one hand and a broad base of general supporting knowledge on the other hand. Figure 3 gives an overview, which breadth of knowledge is desirable and should be part of the continuous qualification process for purchasers. Referring to profound purchasing experience, Fig. 4 offers a broad overview, which specific skills and mindset are needed to complement the breadth of knowledge. On the level of an individual purchaser, it is desirable to fulfill the majority of the requirements listed above. A diverse purchasing team is helpful to supplement individual skill gaps with skills from other team members. Or as Siemens CEO Joe Kaeser sees it: “No one can be perfect. But a team can be.” In this context,
Fig. 3 T-shaped model of qualification: well-rounded qualification profile (authors’ own figure)
84
Y. Weiß and S. Kamm Skills
Functional • Distinct technical skills which are equivalent to a developer • Technical assessment competence • Functional knowledge on supply chain management Methodical • Negotiation management and negotiation methods • Project- and time management • Thinking in alternatives • Strategic planning and planning in scenarios • Decision-making ability in ambiguous environments • Agile working methods • Creativity • Management of complexity • Handling of conflicts of objectives
Mindset • • • • •
High degree of responsibility Self-reflection Open-mindedness Mental flexibility Willingness to • be a multi-talent generalist • continuously learn and improve • travel
Social • Networking skills, skills to build up sustainable relationships • Ability to work in interdisciplinary teams • Empathy & intuition • Cooperative negotiating skills • Communication skills • Intercultural and foreign language skills • Frustration tolerance
Fig. 4 Qualification profile purchaser 4.0 (table compiled by authors)
responsible managers must be well trained in diversity management and in forming and leading diverse teams as well as in fostering cooperation within the team. China is one of the most important sourcing markets for automotive OEMs. So, which additional skills do purchasers need in order to master the specific challenges in China and to successfully work with Chinese partners?
6
Additional Skills Needed in China
Before we will elaborate on the specific skills needed in China, we would like to give a short overview on how the purchasing function in China looks like. In most Chinese companies, the purchasing function is still in its beginning, even in companies which have been active in international environments for several years. Purchasing functions as in European OEMs are mostly not existing in an equivalent way. Purchasers of Chinese OEMs often fulfill administrative tasks but are not responsible for strategically selecting suppliers, negotiating, or building up longlasting relationships with partners. In China, usually, the developer in cooperation with the management team takes the decision which suppliers are selected. The strategic relevance of the purchasing function is currently not seen as high as in Europe but might change in the future.
Upskilling for “Purchasing 4.0”
85
Core Values
Interpersonal Harmony
Austerity
Reputation and Social Status
Endurance
Fig. 5 Core values in the Chinese culture (authors’ own figure)
When dealing with Chinese business partners, it is crucial to understand the core values of the Chinese culture, which are derived from Chinese Confucianism and which strongly influence Chinese thinking and behavior.4 Knowing and understanding these core values is especially important for purchasers who aim to build up relationships with Chinese suppliers for the first time or who aim to build up sustainable and long-lasting strategic partnerships in areas of mutual specific interest such as battery cells (Fig. 5). • Interpersonal harmony: Building up harmonious interpersonal relationships plays a major role in Chinese society. Only after having established a solid and harmonious relationship, Chinese are willing to offer loyalty and trust. • Austerity: Due to economic and political instability in the past, generations of Chinese have learnt to save money and to manage their personal financial resources with a long-term orientation. This established core value influences Chinese behavior in price negotiations. • Reputation and social status: Chinese children are trained from early age on to have a high reputation and to contribute to aim for a high social status in society. Therefore, ranks and titles play a major role in the Chinese business world. • Endurance: Also, from early childhood on, Chinese are trained to work hard for their goals. Laziness and inactivity are frowned upon. Therefore, Chinese are trained to work with a high level of energy and persistency until they have reached their objectives. A special element of the Chinese culture is the concept of “Guanxi.”5 Many China experts see guanxi as one of the most crucial success factors for doing business in China. Fundamentally “guanxi means building a network of mutually beneficial relationships which can be used for personal and business purposes. In this sense, guanxi is not so much different than the importance of having a strong network when doing business in any country. However, in China, guanxi plays a far more important role than it does in the West” (Business Insider 2011). 4
For more details see Weiß (2017a), p. 101 seq. For more details see Weiß (2017a), p. 105 seq.
5
86
Y. Weiß and S. Kamm
Network-Outsider
Family
Network-Insider
Relationship Sound-Barrier” ”
Clan Friends
Fig. 6 Guanxi as success factor in China (authors’ own figure)
Chinese clearly differentiate between “Network-Outsiders” and “Network-Insiders.” Family, clan, and friends represent the personal network of a Chinese person, and they are part of the personal “guanxi.” Only within this network, trustworthy relationships and cooperation are possible. The term “friend,” however, has a broader scope than in Western cultures. Everyone who breaks through the “relationship sound barrier” can be regarded as a friend. Therefore, repetitive activities outside the board room and office such as dinners and sharing time in the evening or week-end together are appropriate measures to become a business “friend” (Fig. 6). So how can European purchasers prepare themselves for cooperating and negotiating with Chinese partners? What are special characteristics of the Chinese business culture? Which special skills are relevant? • Strategic relationship building and networking in the sense of guanxi are crucial for finding the right Chinese partners. Investing in guanxi takes time but is a necessary investment for entering long-term and trustworthy relationships. • Therefore, a high level of interest for the Chinese culture in combination with distinct intercultural skills is necessary for every purchaser in China. Personal relationship building often takes place outside regular office hours. Joint dinners and “socializing activities” help to better understand the Chinese partner and to build up trust. Relationships in the Chinese culture should be fostered on a continuous and ongoing basis, even if there is no current project. • Status and hierarchy play a major role when negotiating with Chinese partners. Chinese want to negotiate only with partners on the same level. Titles and status symbols play a major role. • Moreover, language skills are relevant. With many Chinese business partners, negotiation discussions cannot take place in English because the language skills of the Chinese counterparts are not sufficient. Consequently, it is recommendable
Upskilling for “Purchasing 4.0”
87
to have own team members who are able to translate during negotiations. As the Chinese language is highly ambiguous, translators must not only be able to speak the Chinese language fluently, they additionally need a profound functional knowledge about the negotiation topics in order to be able to translate adequately. • When negotiating with Chinese partners, it is recommendable to aim at finding a win-win situation. The concept of “giving face” to the Chinese partners and avoiding “losing face” in negotiations is crucial for every negotiation and long-lasting relationship.6
7
Forecast: Do Not Forget the Culture
The complexity and dynamic of the purchasing role will remain high. Thus, the transformation of the purchasing function will continue in the next years. The nature of purchasing will become more and more a cooperation with suppliers at eye level with a strong focus on managing sustainable partnerships as well as mutual interests. The purchasing function will need to adapt quickly to new and continuously changing supplier portfolios and to cope with dynamic supplier structures. The digitalization of purchasing provides high data transparency and fully automated information flow within the value chain. Purchasers are more and more released from administrative work and must focus on added value data analytics or strategic evaluation. Companies should therefore continuously invest in “upskilling” and “reskilling” the purchasing workforce. Not only skills but also the culture should be in the center of interest: We all know: “culture eats strategy for breakfast.” Managers should be willing to establish a culture in which purchasers have enough freedom for their decisions and are able to act as “intrapreneurs” within the company. Strongly hierarchical structures, however, work against the success of a modern purchaser who is able to successfully master the complex challenges of purchasing in the 4.0 environment. Therefore, an appropriate organizational and structural environment needs to be established to facilitate new ways of working together and to establish good conditions for lifelong learning.
References Boston Consulting Group Report. (2016). Supply chains that become real value chains. Retrieved from: https://www.bcg.com/industries/automotive/solutions.aspx. EY. (2017). The six trends driving change in the automotive industry. https://www.ey.com/en_lu/ automotive-transportation/the-six-trends-driving-change-in-the-automotive-industry. Goh, A., & Sullivan, M. (2011). The most misunderstood business concept in China. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/the-most-misunderstood-business-concept-in-china2011-2?IR=T. 6
For further details about cooperating with Chinese partners see Weiß and Weiß (2014) and Weiß (2017a).
88
Y. Weiß and S. Kamm
Hecht, D. (Hrsg.). (2014). Modernes Beschaffungsmanagement in Lehre und Praxis. Berlin: Uni-Edition. McKinsey. (2013). The road to 2020 and beyond: What’s driving the global automotive industry? https://www.mckinsey.com/*/media/mckinsey/dotcom/client_service/Automotive%20and%20 Assembly/PDFs/McK_The_road_to_2020_and_beyond.ashx. Miller, R. (2017). The six trends driving change in the automotive industry. Retrieved from: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/automotive-transportation/the-six-trends-driving-change-in-the-auto motive-industry. Lazard, & Roland Berger. (2018). Global automotive supplier study 2018. Retrieved from: https:// www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_global_automotive_supplier_ study_2018.pdf. Strack, R., Dyrchs, S., Kotsis, A., & Mingardon, S. (2017). How to gain and develop digital talent and skills, a Boston Consulting Report. Retrieved from: https://www.bcg.com/de-de/ publications/2017/people-organization-technology-how-gain-develop-digital-talent-skills.aspx. Weiß, Y. (2017a). Strategisches Talentmanagement in China: Mitarbeiter finden und binden: Leitfaden für erfolgreiche Personalführung. 2. Auflage, Wiesbaden 2017. Weiß, Y. (2017b). Erfolgskritische Kompetenzen im digitalen Zeitalter: Was sind die „Future Hot Skills“? Sonderdruck der Technischen Hochschule Nürnberg, Nr. 67, Nürnberg 2017. Weiß, Y., & Weiß, F. (2014). Deutsch-chinesisches Projektteams erfolgreich führen. In D. Hecht, (Hrsg.), Modernes Beschaffungsmanagement in Lehre und Praxis (pp. 269–280). Berlin: Uni-Edition.
Prof. Dr. Yasmin Weiß has worked for more than 10 years for Accenture, E.ON and the BMW Group in different roles, also as responsible HR Manager for the supplier network of BMW Asia. In 2011, she has been appointed as a professor for business administration at the Nuremberg Institute of Technology. Since 2013 she holds various mandates on supervisory and advisory boards of German companies and is also Managing Director of the Institute for German-Chinese Cooperation IDCZ. In 2013, Federal Minister Sigmar Gabriel appointed her as a member of the “Council on Foreign Trade” of the German Ministry of Economics.
Dr. Sonja Kamm is Senior Manager at the BMW Group and responsible HR Business Partner for the Purchasing and Supplier Network of digital components and services. She has been working for the BMW Group for more than 15 years holding various functions within the Production and HR division. Focus topics of her current role are talent and competency management issues for the purchasing division.
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization of the Quality Philosophy into the Upstream Supply Chain Johanna Ewald and Florian Schupp
1
Review of Literature
Based on the zero-defect philosophy, quality management and supply management are merging over the years toward supply quality management, which is focusing on evaluation, measuring and developing supplier quality performance. Originating from the total quality movement, the zero-defect philosophy generated by Philip Crosby is the foundation of all interpretive quality activities, since “it is always cheaper to do the job right the first time” (Crosby 1979). Reaching this level requires a commitment to the zero-defect philosophy from all members of the supply chain (Weißbrich et al. 2008). In terms of Porter’s corporate strategy (Porter 1999), supplier quality therefore has to be assigned to the functional strategy as a part of the supply strategy. Deming and Juran were among the first ones to publish about quality in the purchasing process in the 1960s and 1970s. A deeper connection between quality management and supply management started in the late 1990, when it was recognized that a qualitatively high product can only be produced with a quality commitment of the whole supply chain (Ross 1998). This stretch of the total quality movement into the supply chain can be considered as a consequential step of completion (Ross 1998), while Levy (1998) contemplates supply chain quality management as a new organizational field. Today, the idea of supply chain quality evolves toward managing the supplier and improving its quality by evaluation, quality performance measurement and supplier development (Noshad and Awasthi 2014). J. Ewald Hochschule Furtwangen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany F. Schupp (&) Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 F. Schupp and H. Wöhner (eds.), The Nature of Purchasing, Management for Professionals, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_3
89
90
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
Likewise, the evaluation of supplier performance has evolved over time, starting with Ishikawa’s description of audits as an appropriate quality tool in the 1980s (Ishikawa 1985). Shrimali (2010) finds seven reoccurring steps for the supplier evaluation in literature: Identify critical commodities, identify critical suppliers, form a cross-functional team, meet with supplier’s top management, identify key projects, create a target agreement and oversee status and strategies. Other quality-evaluating tools are capability analysis (Behrens 2008) and quality and reliability metrics (Fernandez 1995). Besides the mentioned quality tools, today’s evaluation is also focusing on the cooperation between two companies. The cooperation level should be investigated, regarding the kind and the quality of the relationship. The supplier’s stage of integration into the customer’s processes (Pang and Tan 2017) and the relationship characteristics have a powerful impact on a company’s delivery quality (Soares et al. 2017). After evaluating the areas of failure, a performance measurement system should be implemented which provides information about the scope of failure (Supply Chain Council 2012). The creator of the zero-defect philosophy already found out that “people really like to be measured when the measurement is fair and open” (Crosby 1979). In terms of quality, a fair and open measurement system should reward those suppliers that deliver according to all service and product specifications (Sanchez-Rodriguez et al. 2005). Performance indicators for supplier quality can be used from the beginning of the product development process by measuring “success of new product introduction” down to the delivery of poor quality by “percentage of defective products received” or “defective parts per million” (Roberts 2013). The used measurement should emphasize on actions and improvement possibilities to help develop the supplier (Narasimhan and Kim 2002). One main objective in supplier development is to improve the suppliers’ overall quality (Hartley and Choi 1996). This can be supported by an internal quality management of the customer, which does not only impact the downstream quality directly but also significantly affect the upstream and downstream quality management in the supply chain (Zeng et al. 2012; Quang et al. 2016). Besides own quality improvement, long-term supplier–buyer relationships (Choi and Liker 2004), rewarding well-performing suppliers (Sanchez-Rodriguez et al. 2005) and quality trainings (Shokri et al. 2010) can support suppliers to improve. Besides the operational development, the supplier’s management has to be involved in the process. It is not only part of the management responsibilities to establish a quality orientated mindset in a company (Feigenbaum 1993), but the practiced leadership style influences the quality performance of a company (Teonman and Ulengin 2017). Literature is in most parts focusing on the supplier evaluation and development prior to the start of a serial production, launch of a product or ownership transition. The delivery of poor quality after the beginning of production in a business-to-business context has received less attention. Complaint management has often been investigated regarding consumer markets, but it is as well important in business-to-business markets since it can damage long-term relationships (Döscher 2014). Brock et al. found that important factors in handling complaints are
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
91
their effective processing and an adequate compensation of the potential loss (Brock et al. 2013). An emerging practice shows that an effective complaint processing can be ensured by a cross-company IT-Structure (Roberts 2013). Another tool, the 8D-Report, first introduced by the US Military in the norm “Corrective Action and Disposition System for Nonconforming Material,” investigates the complaint out of eight different dimensions to ensure a holistic completion. It should prevent repetitive errors by identifying long-term improvement actions. With the completion signature from the customer, the responsibility is split between the customer and the supplier (Jung et al. 2011). Another revealing method is the cost tracking of poor quality delivered, which ensures a fair compensation of the failure costs incurred (Brock et al. 2013). Only a few authors consider the connection between supplier quality development and complaint management in their publications. This relation is considered by using performance indicators like bad quality delivered to evaluate the supplier but not by developing the supplier based on occurring failures. This combination should be examined closer especially because product recalls in the automotive industry have increased during the past few years (Steinkamp and Reed 2016). This indicates that the approach of error prevention is not working properly. Some supplier rating systems are using the number of complaints among others as a quality performance indicator (Irlinger 2012). The advantage of using simply the absolute number of complaints as a base for supplier development needs a closer investigation. Besides performance measurement, other quality improvement measures should be defined. One possible approach is the analysis of root causes from previous complaints. Learning from the past failures shall make the definition of future improvement measures easier and more concrete. Additionally, it will open the possibility of defining the place and extent of supplier improvement actions. Furthermore, when supplier quality development starts with internal quality management, then complaint management should also start with evaluating internal complaint processing by respective measuring. References about internal complaint management and how to measure this process are not closely observed by scholars, so far. The target is to find a measurement that provides information about the efficiency and effectiveness of the complaint process that improvements can be introduced. The following questions will be answered in the corresponding sub-chapter: Which possibilities exist to develop internal processes? Can supplier development methods be modified and implemented also at the customer?
2
Objective and Structure
The emphasized gaps in literature are the business-to-business complaint management, the connection between complaint management and supplier quality improvement and the evaluation and development of the customer’s internal complaint process. Based on these gaps, this chapter deals with the supplier
92
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
Fig. 1 Improving supplier quality by external and internal processes (authors’ own figure)
complaint processing and connects it to supplier quality improvement. To illuminate the topic further, the chapter splits the complaint management into three different facets: supplier quality performance measurement, supplier quality improvement and the internal complaint process development. The measurement and analysis of poor quality of supplied parts or materials provide the basis for the conceptual conclusions in this chapter. The relative value of the measurement with absolute numbers will be answered, and a possible tracking procedure will be suggested. Based on the collected data, the implementation of protective, corrective and improvement actions will be discussed. While improving the supplying firm, opportunities to develop the customer’s internal complaint processes are suggested. Therefore, an appropriate measurement system will be introduced, which builds the foundation for further improvements (Fig. 1).
3
Supplier Quality Performance Measurement
To measure supplier quality performance, the different performance indicators are compared with each other and among those the measurement of incidents or single claims is used as the basis for improvement. Using this performance indicator, a transparent tracking procedure is applied. In order to conceptually develop a holistic supplier quality management concept, supplier complaint data from a large, multinational supplier to the industrial and automobile industries is collected and analyzed.
3.1 Measuring Supplier Quality The fact that a lot of “costs are arising due to poor quality” (Noshad and Awasthi 2015) confirms that many companies have not reached the zero-defect level yet. These costs have many different origins, for example, costs for line stops, return shipments or working time for complaint processing. They do not necessarily occur
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
93
for every defective part, rather for every opened complaint. The origin of each case differs and needs to be defined individually. To minimize costs and to reach the zero-defect level, an appropriate measurement system for poor quality delivered needs to be applied. A common performance indicator for poor materials or components supplied in the automobile industry is the measurement of defective parts per million (Brunner and Wagner 2016). The measurement in parts per million shows the relation between the defective parts and the number of delivered parts. It does not show how many complaints were opened due to these defective parts. If a whole batch is defective, it results into one complaint. Meanwhile, several defective parts from several batches result into more than one complaint. Consequential, it is not possible to see the total number of complaints in this performance indicator. Furthermore, an improvement of this performance indicator can be achieved by delivering more parts and not by improving the absolute quality itself. However, zero-defective part per million indicates that the zero-defect strategy is fulfilled. In general, measuring a relation of indicators always faces the same problem. An immediate statement regarding the number of complaints and therefore the number of cases that need to be solved is not possible. A performance indicator, which makes the total number of occurring complaints visible, would be advantageous. The measurement of the absolute number of complaints is one possibility, which is already used for example in the automobile industry. This provides the opportunity to see the fulfillment of the zero-defect strategy and more important, the number of opened quality complaints. Another advantage of this performance indicator is the direct allocation of the complaint costs to each incident. Finally, ranking the different suppliers by the yearly number of complaints enhances the competition. The competition is harder, because a supplier can only improve his ranking by decreasing the number of yearly complaints, not by more deliveries. Concluding, the view of the authors is that measuring each complaint is the most advantageous performance indicator to decrease the number of complaints and their respective costs. On the basis of a chosen performance indicator, the extent of the improvement needs to be defined. Therefore, a fixed target to be reached will be set. The overall target can be any number of yearly complaints; it should be challenging and reachable. Thus, each supplier shall be guided to reach zero defects with realistic steps. Summarizing, the absolute number of complaints is the chosen performance indicator to measure the supplier’s quality performance. This way of measuring fulfills the point of fairness, and it rewards suppliers that deliver according to all specifications. The target of the measurement system will be a fixed, challenging but reachable number of yearly complaints.
94
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
3.2 Strategic Supplier Quality Tracking and Improvement Having chosen the performance indicator and the target, a clear tracking procedure needs to be developed. Transferring an ABC-Analysis into complaint management would mean that 20% of all suppliers are causing 80% of the complaints, 30% are causing 15% of the complaints and 50% are causing 5% of the complaints. Based on such an ABC-Analysis, evaluations mostly point toward the suppliers classified as A-Suppliers for rewarding or C-Suppliers for developing. The suppliers evaluated as neither good nor bad are often disregarded and therefore show a high risk of a quality decline. To avoid this, a fair complaint measurement system from the authors’ point of view classifies into two groups with one group of suppliers causing complaints and another group of suppliers that have already reached zero defects. Suppliers causing 80% of the complaints are being defined as Flop-Suppliers, while suppliers causing the other 20% are called Non-Flop-Suppliers. Suppliers, which already fulfill zero defect, are called Zero-Defect-Suppliers and are representing the target for all other suppliers. The present work is establishing a link between complaint management and supplier quality management looking in an exemplary way into the supplier quality data of a large supplier to the automobile and industrial industries. This data is used to understand focus areas for supplier development from a quality perspective in a holistic way not limited to the actual data itself. Concerning the introduced supplier classification method, the analyzed case data suggests that 66% of the suppliers can be classified as Zero-Defect-Suppliers and on the other hand 34% of the suppliers cause complaints. Out of these suppliers, 17% are causing 80% of the complaints and are classified as Flop-Suppliers, while 83% of these suppliers cause 20% of the complaints and are classified as Non-Flop-Suppliers (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 Spread of suppliers causing complaints (authors’ own figure)
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
95
In a first step in quality improvement, Flop-Suppliers will receive higher attention. It is recommendable to track their results individually to see the specific progress or regress. To see the progression immediately, the tracking on a monthly basis with all involved employees is necessary, as a holistic view on the supplier’s performance can only be provided by an interdisciplinary team. Decision making or strategy changes based on the supplier’s results will be discussed at this point as well. Furthermore, it is recommendable that the suppliers get an individual improvement target. This target is set in reference to the overall target and fulfills the same attributes as stated above. The special attention is not only for the measurement system, but also the improvement measures are defined individually. As illustrated in Fig. 3, the improvement process should be based on five basic steps. The first step of identifying the critical suppliers is already done. For these suppliers, expertise in the specific production processes will be applied (step 2) and meetings with the supplier’s top management are taking place (step 3). It is important that the top management is involved in quality improvement, because it is their task to develop a quality program and a mindset for the company (Feigenbaum 1993). Further, the supplier’s processes need to be improved on a technical level (step 4). Based on the results of improvement, target agreements have to be created (step 5). Since the technical capability of the supplier should gradually ameliorate, the last two steps of supplier quality improvement need to be overviewed regularly. In case of a significant negative drift of a supplier, another top management meeting should be reconsidered to align the company’s quality standards. In summary, the tracking procedure for supplier quality improvement is done by a classification of the suppliers into Flop-, Non-Flop- and Zero-Defect-Suppliers. This Flop-, Non-Flop-, Zero-Defect-Suppliers classification is a modification of the ABC-Analysis. Flop-Suppliers are tracked individually on a monthly basis to see their progress or regress. The supplier quality improvement is a process consisting of five steps in which the last two steps build a loop that should be reviewed on a regular time basis. In the following case, the historical complaint data of an automobile and industrial supplier has been analyzed. The occurring major technical problems of the suppliers will provide the basis of generalized quality improvement measures.
Fig. 3 Five steps of supplier quality improvement (authors’ own figure)
96
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
3.3 Database for Quality Improvement Measures An occurring error pattern is only a sign for the existence of a problem. Eliminating this error pattern does not necessarily solve a problem sustainably, analogous to medicine. Medicating the symptom does not mean the disease should not occur again. The same disease could probably come to the surface again or potentially even through another symptom. Therefore, the root cause needs to be found and to be eliminated to sustainably remove one problem. To build a database for the elimination of root causes, the complaint data from the analyzed company was collected. All complaints of Flop- and Non-Flop-Suppliers delivering to different plants of the customer were taken into consideration. The root causes of the respective complaints were detected by an Ishikawa diagram (Ishikawa 1976) and a 5-Why Analysis, first introduced by Sakichi Toyoda in the Toyota Motor Corporation (Ohno 1988), as part of the 8D-Report. Resulting over a period of nine months, 333 complaints were investigated. In a first step, occurring root causes were counted according to the seven influence factors (refer to Fig. 4) used in the Ishikawa diagrams, also called seven M’s: Management, Man (human), Material, Measurement, Machine, Mother Nature and Method. A first analysis of the data shows that 30% of the investigated complaints cannot be reproduced due to an incompletion of the 8D-Report. However, human, method and machine are the root cause of 195 complaints, which represent 59% of all complaints. The other 11% are separated into the four missing influence factors. Because of the gap between the three main influence factors and the other ones, only the ones occurring the most will be further investigated to introduce improvement measures. Resulting from the incomplete 8D-Report, improvement measures for the development of the internal complaint process will be followed.
Fig. 4 Root causes classified by the number of occurrence and the different influence factors (authors’ own figure)
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
97
In the following paragraphs, the different root causes for the three main influence factors are introduced. These influence factors do not occur more frequently in one of the observed plants or in a specific month. Therefore, the analysis will be carried out without a differentiation by plants. Following the Pareto analysis, the problems with the highest occurrence need to be eliminated first. The method as a cause of complaints looks at all supplier processes. This does not only involve the production process but also logistical processes such as packaging, storage or internal transportation. Generally, the frequency of occurring methodological errors refers to the supplier’s lack on control over their processes. To improve the suppliers’ processes, customers install supportive functions inhouse, which should manage the suppliers’ quality as a starting point of improvement (Noshad and Awasthi 2015). The results of the presented case further show the need for a function that manages the supplier quality after the start of series production. The case shows that additional development methods and actions need to be defined and realized between supplier and customer. The basis for further improvement is built by the information about the different causes as shown in Fig. 5. The data analysis shows that nine different root causes occur related to the Ishikawa influence factor Method. Out of these, 70% of the complaints root causes are wrongly implemented production and logistic processes and production line setup. Because the occurrence of these root causes is predominant, actions to reduce the number of complaints in these three areas will be illuminated in the chapter “Supplier quality improvement measures.” Since the other six root causes occur more seldomly, detailed improvement measures should be investigated and implemented case by case (Fig. 5). The Ishikawa factor Man describes complaints, which are based on human mistakes. The three most frequently occurring root causes are work instruction ignored, slip in control and setting parts delivered, contributing to 50% of
Fig. 5 Different root causes of the influence factor method classified by the number of occurrence (authors’ own figure)
98
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
human-influenced complaints. The root-cause slip in control describes the process of visual control, e.g., at the end of the production line. Such control is used, when a technology is not robust enough to fulfill the zero-defect strategy. Possible measures for these human-based mistakes will be introduced in the chapter “Supplier quality improvement measures.” The other 50% of human-influenced factors are caused by seven different root causes (Fig. 6). The complaints based on a Machine influence show a smaller deviation in the different root causes. Almost 80% of the complaints originate from either a defective machine on which the production continued or from tool wear. This root cause refers to tool usage after the maximum production output was reached. To reduce the number of machine-based complaints, measures for these two root causes should be implemented (Fig. 7). Concluding, the analysis of 333 complaints shows that 23% of the complaints are based on the influence factor man, 21% on the influence factor method and 15% on the influence factor machine. It also shows that a big amount of complaints was
Fig. 6 Different root causes of the influence factor man (human) classified by the number of occurrence (authors’ own figure)
Fig. 7 Different root causes of the influence factor machine classified by the number of occurrence (authors’ own figure)
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
99
not able to be reproduced due to a lack in the 8D-Report processing. Further, the data confirms that the complaints originate from several different root causes and working in cross-functional teams to resolve the claims can be advantageous. The raised data is setting the basis for the following improvement measures.
4
Supplier Quality Improvement Measures
To ensure that good quality will be delivered in future, protective and improvement actions need to be consequently implemented. At first it needs to be clarified, where these actions should be applied. In the presented case, the quality inspection of incoming goods rarely projects the complaints and therefore the production line is rather identifying bad parts, while producing the own product. This sole way of working shall be avoided. The suppliers commit to deliver parts according to the aligned specification. It is not the customer’s duty to ensure the supplied parts quality level. Furthermore, a clear statement that poor quality is not acceptable should be made toward the supplying firm. With the target to put pressure on the supplier and to minimize the default risk at the customer’s plant, all corrective actions need to be implemented at the supplier’s plant. These improvement measures can be divided into four main areas (refer to Fig. 8). They are immediate protective actions, limited protective measures, permanent corrective measures and sustainable improvement measures. Only sustainable improvement measures can improve the supplier’s processes from a process robustness point of view. Not all technologies can reach zero defects from a technical point of view (Töpfer 2007), sustainable improvement measures are supported by the implementation of permanent corrective actions. Furthermore, protective measures, which ensure a quick coverage of parts delivered in bad quality, will be explained. An immediate protective action is used whenever the supplier has delivered poor quality. The main focus is to guarantee that no further defective parts will be received from the same defective batch. Therefore, the stock at the supplier’s plant and the goods in transit will be sorted 100% by the supplier. This measure is meant Deduction of improvement measures Reactive measures Proactive measures Immediate protective action Protective measures, applied when bad quality was delivered
Limited protective measures Applied, when bad quality was delivered repetetively and for short-term supplier improvement
Permanent corrective measures Applied proactivly, when the production process generates defects (Digital firewall)
Sustainable improvement measures Applied proactively, based on the raised data from the past
Fig. 8 Different levels of supplier quality improvement measures (authors’ own figure)
100
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
to avoid further defect parts, which disturb the production process. Still, this is only a short-term protective measure, and for actual quality improvement, additional measures need to be found. If suppliers deliver several errors on the same product or show repetitive errors, the limited protective measure of controlled shipments will apply. Controlled shipments are commonly used as quality tools in several industries. Controlled shipment measures can be differentiated into three levels of inspection. It targets to ensure the suppliers delivered quality based on a 100% visual control. At the same time, the supplier should evaluate his occurring faults and learn from them for the future. The goal is an improvement of the internal supplier production process regarding the occurring faults. The Controlled Shipment Level concept consists of three basic steps: 1. 100% inspection by the supplier 2. 100% control by an external service provider 3. 100% control by an external service provider and new business hold. The supplier moves one escalation level up whenever another defective part of the same part number is delivered to the customer. Important is that this tool is not made to ban suppliers, but to develop them immediately and for the future. This tool is designed for a short-term improvement and learning process, and it is used reactively to enhance the pressure toward the supplier. The last step of this tool is called “new business hold.” This final step puts pressure on the supplier to increase his quality level. Certainly, the Controlled Shipment Level is often utilized with Flop-Suppliers, because they mostly show repetitive errors. Still, when Non-Flop-Suppliers have problems with one particular part number or part family, such a tool can prevent the customer from too many defective parts in their production. Accordingly, to develop supplier quality on a long-term horizon, permanent corrective or sustainable improvement measures need to be implemented. Permanent corrective measures are applied especially in technologies, which cannot fulfill the zero-defect philosophy from a production process stability point of view. The main idea behind this action is to ensure that good quality is delivered to the customer, although the production process can generate defects. In order to deliver according to the zero-defect strategy, a permanent 100% control needs to be implemented. Traditionally, employees would carry out a visual control at the end of the production line. As the presented case data shows, 15% of the human mistakes are slip in these end-of-line controls. This can be explained by the average error detection for automotive components of about 90–98% (See 2012). To prevent the slip in the visual control and to avoid these complaints, the suppliers can, for example, implement automatic camera control systems, which can be called digital firewalls. Digital firewalls can be used as 100% end-of-line control and are more effective than the human eye. The camera control systems are investments, which will probably redeem due to the fact that no compensation costs for complaints occur. This is still not the final target, because bad quality is produced and the intended way for the supplying and customer is to totally avoid the production of bad quality.
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
101
For a better cost efficiency, sustainable improvement measures need to be implemented. The goal of these measures is to improve the processes and not to separate good parts from bad parts. These measures are defined by data raised from the past (refer to Figs. 5, 6 and 7) and should be implemented to reduce complaints on a technical level. The data revealed that the influence factors method, human and machine are most frequently leading to complaints.
4.1 Influence Factor Method In the following paragraphs, possible improvement measures for the earlier identified most often occurring root causes of the influence factor method, production processes, logistics and production line setup are described. Production process: Plastic injection molding and metal casting processes are combined in this root cause for the present dataset. In general, the target is to optimize molding and casting processes by implementing sensor techniques. These sensor techniques should monitor the real-time data from the practical molding and casting processes and compare them with the theoretically and required set data. The permanent target-performance comparison should provide information about deviations in the process and delimit parameter-based failures in the production process. The real-time monitoring of molding and casting processes can lead to an enhanced quality performance with a saving potential of 3–5% from the manufacturing cost at the casting company and potential quality cost savings at the customer (Larsen 2018). Logistics (Storage and Packaging): Logistics problems that result into quality complaints are either originating from a too long storage time or from insufficient packaging specifications. A main influence factor on the storage time is the used type of storage and the used inventory managing method. The first-in first-out inventory managing method is predestined to be carried out in a wrong manner, when the storage is organized in blocks or bulks. The faulty execution of the inventory managing methods, or the chosen storage organization, could possibly lead to longer storage times, which many materials cannot withstand. The storage problems can occur after the production at the supplier plant and after the arrival at the buying plant. To avoid these problems, a detailed view of the first-in first-out procedure is necessary. A better reconciliation between the supplying and customer could lead to a shorter storage time. In general, the target of this measure is to reduce the storage time. To avoid problems based on wrong packaging, a look into the details is necessary. Before every new ordered product, packaging specification needs to be aligned. To identify the right packaging specification, the transportation method or
102
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
storage should be analyzed as well. An example from the regarded data includes a supplier that delivered a product continental and overseas. The packaging specification for this product was the same for the two different locations. As a result, the supplier had big rust issues with the product delivered overseas, because this packaging was not sufficient. The example shows that there is a need to deeply investigate every case and then align packaging standards and if necessary, define two different storage and packaging specifications for different ship to locations. Production line setup: Avoiding production-line-based problems, one effective tool could be a reverse Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Such reverse process FMEA is a continuous improvement tool used to analyze new risks occurring during the real-life serial production of a product, while the original FMEA tries to predict potential failures in the future. Therefore, an interdisciplinary team inspects the production line and tries to identify all possible failures in a manufacturing or assembly process. Actions to correct the possible failures are defined and are transferred to the other production lines (Parrott et al. 2011). This process should be repeated several times. Processing the reverse FMEA in a short interval in the beginning is recommendable. The tool is especially useful to identify not functional sensors and equipment or similar, equipment which lost its functionality due to rework of the production line.
4.2 Influence Factor Man (Human) In a next step, improvement measures for the influence factor human will be introduced. In general, one-third of the complaints in the analyzed dataset are caused by humans. Assuming that these failures are not intentional, the lessons from these are that the operators’ knowledge needs to be enhanced toward a good quality production. In general, it seems like there is no sensitivity for quality communicated and forwarded from the management to the operators. Besides workshops by the own supplier quality department, an employee of the customer can perform trainings at the supplier plant. The employee of the customer has a higher authority to address this topic. Further, the trainings should be held repetitively, in order to actually change the mindset of the operators. Building a better knowledge and mindset should help operators to work according to work instructions. Nevertheless, zero defects cannot be ensured by eliminating human failures through trainings. Technical improvements, which guarantee that inattention does not lead to a failure, should be established. Therefore, the implementation of Poka-Yoke systems at the supplier’s plant is recommendable for every critical production step. The lean manufacturing tool Poka-Yoke is designed to exclude errors caused by operators and to correct them on a long-term time horizon, through
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
103
an optimization of the workspace. Quality employees of the customer can support the introduction of the system and help with the implementation if necessary. Work instruction ignored Supportive to the explained tool, the focal firm of the present case suggested another quality tool, which is known as linewalk or Gemba Walk. This tool has the character of an audit carried out by the supplier himself. It consists of different audit like questions about the operator, setter and the production line itself. The suppliers’ quality department employee walks by the production line once a week, asks the audit questions and identifies poor working sections. Immediately after finishing the linewalk, the employee gives feedback to the operators and setters. The tool reveals human-based problems like the missing qualification of employees or an unclear definition of work instructions. Based on this feedback, improvement actions are suggested. Other employees and managers can perform this tool on a lower frequency and give their feedback. Setting parts delivered Before a machine can be released for the serial production, a first batch of parts is produced which may not fulfill the aligned specifications. Of course, this batch is not supposed to be delivered to the customer. Normally, the operators are sensitive to these parts and know that this batch should not be delivered. Besides this sensitivity, which never is a final exclusion of a defect, other actions need to be implemented, so that complaints due to this root cause do not occur. Therefore, an automatization of the removal process of parts out of specification produced after setting a machine should be considered as an additional measure. On the basis of a standardized setup process, which includes the determination of a specific number of defective parts produced after the setup, an automatic removal of these parts should be implemented. The automatic removal should also be applied after each and every planned or unplanned interruption of production.
4.3 Influence Factor Machine The root-cause machine defect and tool wear can be eliminated by implementing sensor techniques already described for molding and casting processes. These techniques shall identify parameters, which indicate that the machine has a defect or the tools’ maximum output is exceeded. By automating this process, the human influence on this root cause as well as the root cause itself can be eliminated. In summary, by implementing measures to improve the method, machine and human-based complaints, about 50% of complaints could be avoided in the presented case. Regarding the number of missing 8D-Reports, this number could even be higher if the same root causes occur repetitively. Of course, every customer has to identify the causes of complaints in the past individually and apply their expertise
104
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
as suggested in the second supplier quality improvement step. The shown measures give an example how supplier quality can be improved by digging deep into the details of complaints. According to the analyzed data, the 8D-Report processing can be improved as well. The next chapter will indicate possible ways to improve here.
5
Developing Internal Complaint Processes
The quality of internal processes at the customer is setting the base for further improvements. Identifying weaknesses of the own complaint processes will reveal the areas of improvement possibilities. Looking at the respective procedures of complaint processes, each customer will identify its own weaknesses in the process. As shown in the chapter “Database for quality improvement measures” in the observed firm, one weakness was the 8D-Report processing. Almost 30% of the reports of Non-Flop-Suppliers are not filled out properly or the complaints were processed without an 8D-Report. Looking into both, the complaints from Flop-Suppliers and Non-Flop-Suppliers, about 25% of the 8D-Reports, are not processed properly. The second step is to identify the causes for the incompletion of the 8D-Reports. It was observed that the processing time of the reports took very long. This means the efficiency of the document is not given. A second cause is a not satisfying content of the reports; therefore, the effectiveness needs to be improved. Performance measurement is defined as the efficiency and effectiveness of action (Neely et al. 1995). This leads toward defining a measurement system, which identifies the actual efficiency and effectiveness of the 8D-Report.
5.1 Efficiency of the 8D-Report First, the completion time of the 8D-Reports will be further investigated. The first three disciplines of the 8D-Report should be closed after 24 h (Jung et al. 2011). The exact processing time for all disciplines is depending on the requirement of the customer. Different companies show that their required average processing time until D5 should take between 8 and 12 business days (Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. 2017). Processing the required documents in time is not only the responsibility of the supplier. The supplier quality department employee of the customer should track and remind the supplier to turn the document in on time. Therefore, part of the responsibility is on the customer. To guarantee that the customer has a fast processing, the average processing time can be measured. To improve the processing time, further actions can be implemented either directly at the customer’s plant or at the supplier. As a supportive tool, an integrated ERP-System application for complaint management can be used at the buying and the supplying firm. Such systems provide automatic reminders and help to keep the overview. As a result, the average D5 completion time should be under 12 working days over all proceeded 8D-Reports.
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
105
5.2 Effectiveness of the 8D-Report Besides decreasing the processing time, the equally important part of the 8D-Report is the quality of its content. Especially the content from dimension four, root-cause analysis, to dimension seven, implementation of corrective actions, is important. To determine where quality problems occur, a content measurement should be implemented. “People will only tell you the troubles that others cause for them. They will not reveal what they make happen themselves.” (Crosby 1979). Therefore, a direct measurement is not recommendable. This suggest implementing an indirect performance indicator will be better to measure the effectiveness of an 8D-Report. The target of the tool is to eliminate errors after the first time they occurred. Accordingly, an 8D-Report is called effective, when a complaint does not occur a second time. Repetitive errors can only occur, when a wrong root cause was identified, or the permanent corrective actions were not sufficient. Measuring the number of repeated complaints is a possibility to measure the effectiveness of the 8D-Report. Repetitive errors do not only count, when a fault appears a second time on the same part but also on a similar part from the same supplier. It should be the supplier’s interest to implement the corrective actions translationally. Accordingly, the content and therefore the effectiveness of the 8D-Report will be measured indirectly by the number of repeated complaints. With this measurement, suppliers with the most repetitive errors can be identified. Finally, as a part of the measurement procedure, the correlation between the two performance indicators will be observed. Therefore, it needs to be determined if the processing time has an influence on the effectiveness of the 8D-Report. A worst-case scenario shows a short processing time with a negative correlation with effectiveness. In this case, the effectiveness of the 8D-Report should be given a greater value upon the processing time. The best case is a positive influence of the processing time toward the effectiveness. Therefore, a high effectiveness and a short processing time show a positive correlation. This correlation needs to be investigated. The target is a high effectiveness and efficiency of the 8D-Report. To reach it, the earlier introduced improvement tools can be implemented. In summary, the 8D measurement enhances the quality of the 8D-Report content. The average processing time will improve, and consequently, the buying company will be more reactive toward supplier development because the knowledge about the complaint is provided faster and with better content.
6
Summary
This chapter discusses the importance of connecting quality improvement and complaint management in supply management. In fact, quality issues cannot always be avoided and also suddenly occur when well-though-about serial production processes have been started. Each quality incident provides a chance to start with
106
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
the supplier quality improvement and respective optimization possibilities. The performance evaluation indicator of choice for supplier quality is the absolute number of complaints. Three groups of suppliers can be differentiated after being ranked by the absolute number of complaints. Flop-Suppliers are causing 80% of the complaints and are the main focus of quality improvement. Non-Flop-Suppliers cause 20% of the complaints, and so-called Zero-Defect-Suppliers have already reached the zero-defect level. Identifying the critical suppliers is the first main step in supplier quality improvement. For these focus suppliers, expertise should be applied to understand the specific production processes that have led to the failure and consequently to the complaints. As only the top management can fundamentally develop a quality mindset, meetings with their involvement and the respective customers’ counterparts have to take place. Afterward, the supplier production process shall be developed on a technical level. The analysis of the present case data shows that there are three main improvement areas: wrongly implemented production, logistics or packaging processes, human mistakes and defective machines. Improving these processes by implementing sustainable improvement measures or permanent corrective measures and creating target agreements is the final step in supplier quality improvement. The latter two steps are ongoing and have to be repeated on a regular basis until zero defect is reached. In addition to the external improvement, the supplier quality evaluation processes inside the customer should be developed. One perception from the analyzed data is the high amount of complaints which cannot be reproduced due to a lack in the 8D processing. This lack can be explained by the missing efficiency and effectiveness of the document. To improve the complaint process, performance indicators for the two attributes are introduced. For the efficiency, the average processing time is measured, and to evaluate the effectiveness, the number of repetitive complaints can be used. Based on these indicators, improvement measures can be derived.
References Behrens, R. (2008). In Boeing Supplier Strategy and Lean, 93rd Annual Conference on Supply Chain Management, St. Louis, MO. Brock, C., Blut, M., Evanschitzky, H., & Kenning, P. (2013). Satisfaction with complaint handling: A replication study on its determinants in a business-to-business context. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30, 319–322. Brunner, F., & Wagner, K. (2016). Qualitätsmanagement: Leitfaden für Studium und Praxis (6th ed.). München, Germany. Crosby, P. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain (1st ed.). New York, NY. Choi, T., & Liker, J. (2004, December). Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review. Döscher, K. (2014). Recovery Management in business-to-business markets: Conceptual dimensions, relational consequences and financial contributions. Feigenbaum, A. (1993). Creating the quality mindset among senior managers. National Productivity Review, 12(3), 313+.
Zero Shades of Gray—Reaching Zero Defects by Externalization …
107
Fernandez, R. (1995). Total quality in purchasing & supplier management (1st ed.). Miami, Fl: St. Lucie Press. Hartley, J., & Choi, T. (1996). Supplier development: Customers as a catalyst of process change. Business Horizon, 39, 37–44. Irlinger, W. (2012). Kausalmodelle zur Lieferantenbewertung (1st ed.). Passau. Ishikawa, K. (1976). Guide to quality control, Asian productivity organization (2nd ed.). Tokyo. Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? The Japanese way. London: Pentice Hall. Jung, B., Schweißer, S., & Wappis, J. (2011). 2011, 8D und 7 step—Systematisch Probleme lösen. München, Deutschland: E-book. Larsen, P. (2018). Digitalisierung im Einkauf from Schupp F., Woehner, H. (pp. 199–108). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. 978-3-658-16909-1. Levy, P. (1998). Total quality management in the supply chain. In Handbook of total quality management (pp. 275–303). Narasimhan, R., & Kim, A. (2002). Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korean firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 303–323. Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. Noshad, K., & Awasthi, A. (2015). Supplier quality development: A review of literature and industrial practices. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 466–487. Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production (1st ed.). Portland: Productivity Press. Pang, J., & Tan, K. (2017). Supply chain quality and pricing decisions under multi-manufacturer competition. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(1), 164–187. Parrott, K., Mattes, P., & Stahl, D. (2011). Applying advanced FMEA methods to vehicle fire cause determinations. In ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Volume 9, Denver, Colorado, USA. Porter, M. (1999). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, ISBN: 0684841487. Quang, H., Sampaio, P., Carvalho, M., Fernandes, A., Thi, D., & Vilhenac, E. (2016). An extensive structural model of supply chain quality management and firm performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(4), 444–464. Roberts, M. (2013 September 12). Top 5 supplier quality management strategies. Quality Digest Magazine. Ross, D. (1998). Competing through supply chain management: Creating market-winning strategies through supply chain partnerships (1st ed.). New York, NY. Sanchez-Rodriguez, C., Hemsworth, D., & Martinez-Lorente, A. (2005). Quality management practices in the purchasing function: An empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(7), 666–687. See, J. (2012). Visual inspection: A review of the literature. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Shokri, A., Nabhani, F., & Hodgson, S. (2010). Supplier development practice: Arising the problems of upstream delivery for a food distribution SME in the UK. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(6), 639–646. Shrimali, L. (2010). Analysis of success factors for supplier development (Master thesis). San Diego State University. Soares, A., Soltani, E., & Liao, Y. (2017). The influence of supply chain quality management practices on quality performance: An empirical investigation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 22(2), 122–144. Steinkamp, N., & Reed, J. (2016). Automotive warranty and recall report 2015. Stout Risius, Ross Global Financial Advisory Service. Supply Chain Council. (2012). SCOR Quick Reference Guide, Item No. 726770, Texas.
108
J. Ewald and F. Schupp
Teonman, S., & Ulengin, F. (2017). The impact of management leadership on quality performance throughout a supply chain: An empirical study. Journal of Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(11–12). Töpfer, A. (2007). Six sigma: Konzeption und Erfolgsbeispiele für praktizierte Null-Fehler-Qualität (4th ed.). Berlin, Germany. Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. (2017). Qualitätsmanagement-Methoden Assessments Leitfaden (1st ed). Berlin, Germany. Weißbrich, A., Fuchsbauer, B., Heinrichs, H., & Plegnier, H. (2008). Qualitätsmanagement in der gesamten Wertschöpfungskette: Grundlagen des gemeinsamen Erfolgs, Automobiltechnische Zeitschrift, Ausgabe 01/2008. Zeng, J., Phan, C.A., & Matsui, Y. (2012). Supply chain quality management practices and performance: An empirical study. Published online 13 January 2013. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
Johanna Ewald is a project purchaser for hybrid systems at Schaeffler Automotive, an international automotive tier-1 supplier. She graduated as MSc in International Management at Furtwangen University, Germany. Her research interests are performance measurement of supplier quality and practical implication of supplier quality improvement. Since joining Schaeffler in 2019, she has been e-motor competent purchaser for multiple projects.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Florian Schupp works as Senior Vice President Purchasing & Supplier Management Automotive OEM at the Schaeffler Group, Germany. He completed his Ph.D. at the Technical University of Berlin in the field of strategy development in purchasing and logistics and has 21 years of purchasing experience in the companies Schaeffler, Continental, Siemens and Sony. He integrates practical purchasing and supply management work with academic research together with the University of Lappeenranta, Finland; the University of Catania, Italy; the Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Chambéry, France; the Technical University Berlin, Germany; and the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany. He teaches purchasing and supply management in Bremen and Berlin. Main research interests are purchasing strategy, behavioral aspects in purchasing, purchasing in nature and supplier innovation. Schupp is member of the Advisory Board of BLG Logistics, Bremen, Germany and the Advisory Board of Xtronic, Böblingen, Germany. Since 2019, he is Adjunct Professor for Logistics at the Jacobs University Bremen, Germany.
The Value of Contracts in a Long-Term Context—An Example Based on the Lateran Treaty and the Concordat of 1984 Luigi D’Ottavi
1
Genesis of Lateran Pacts
Understanding the content of 1929 Lateran Pacts requires a brief introspection in the “Questione Romana”, the strong debate arisen since the battle of Rome in 1870 and the capture of the city. In fact, the capture of Rome (“Presa di Roma”), on 20 September 1870, was the last war event of the long process of Italia’s genesis and the Risorgimento, marking both the unification of the whole Italian peninsula under House of Savoy and the ultimate defeat of the Papal States under Pope Pius IX after 1116 of continuous years of reign (since Anno Domini 754). Cavour, the italian statesman appointed by the King Victor Emmanuel II for the birth of the Italian State, had firmly believed that without Rome as the capital, Italy’s unification would be meaningless; it was said that “to go to Rome” was not merely a right but a meaning necessity, not only for the geographical position of the town in the centre of peninsula but also for the remarkable role of the Eternal City embedded by the immortal memories of the Roman Empire, cradle of modern law and spiritual guide of the Catholic Church. In regard to the future relations between Italian State and Holy See, Cavour’s famous dictum was “A free State in a free Church” separating the role of spiritual guide of the Holy See by political affairs of the Kingdom. However, Pius IX, the longest reigning elected pope in the history of the Catholic Church named “Papa Re”, refused that concept of cohabitation and in July 1870, two months before defeat (20 September 1870), affirmed the doctrine of papal infallibility through the First Vatican Council. Certainly, it is not a coincidence that the last political act of Holy See just before the final defeat of the Kingdom was to create a special dogma L. D’Ottavi (&) Rome, Italy e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 F. Schupp and H. Wöhner (eds.), The Nature of Purchasing, Management for Professionals, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_4
109
110
L. D’Ottavi
that states that the Pope is preserved from the possibility of error while he is defining a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church. This declaration was the political response to the “face-saving proposal” previously sent by the Italian King which allowed the Pope to retain the inviolability and connected rights attaching to him as on sovereign and the full jurisdiction of a small part of the city of Rome called the Leonine City. The proposal was strongly refused by Pius IX immediately before Presa di Roma considering it as an act of disloyalty. After the proclamation of Kingdom of Italy, the Papal States were incorporated into the new nation except for the Roman’s premises: for nearly sixty years, relations between the Holy See and the Italian Kingdom were difficult and the struggle became known as the “Roman Question”. In fact, after the capture of Rome, Pope Pius IX and further popes refused to recognize the new institution, and related jurisdiction, established as Italian Government. Thus, the Italian King perceived different solutions, including reconsidering Florence as the capital of Italy, but there was widespread agreement that government must be held in Rome to ensure the survival of the new state. In an attempt of resolving the dispute, Italy’s Law of Guarantees, approved by the Parliament on 13 May 1871, provided to the Pope some privileges at the same level of the Italian Kingdom, included the right to provide proper ambassadors and financial payment on an annual basis to the Vatican. On the contrary, the Pope did not accept any attempt by the Italian Government to set rules on the former territory of the papal properties (“Stato Pontificio”) and clearly declared that the Holy See must be considered independent from political power in both spiritual and domain’s jurisdictions. Emblem of that period of struggle were the words with which the Holy See enjoined upon Italian Catholics the policy of abstention from the polls in italian elections: Roman Curia used the latin phrase “Non expedit” which means it is not fair for a Catholic to deal in political activities. Moreover, on 11 October 1874, the Pope declared that every kind of opening granted by the Holy See to the Italian Government could be interpreted as the formal end of the Vatican power. In 1926, Italian Government and Holy See started negotiations for defining the Roman Question; those attempts ended in the Lateran Pacts of 11 February 1929, signed by Benito Mussolini, on behalf of King Vittorio Emanuele III, as Prime Minister of Government, and by Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, on behalf of Pope Pius XI, as Secretary of State: the agreements took place in the Lateran Palace in Rome, from which they take their name “Patti Lateranensi”.
2
Context and Scope of Agreement in 1929
The Lateran Pacts were agreements made between the Kingdom of Italy and the Holy See, settling the “Roman Question” signed on 11 February 1929, in the Lateran Palace. The Treaty recognized Vatican City as a State being an independent
The Value of Contracts in a Long-Term Context …
111
entity and the Italian Government agreed to give the Roman Catholic Church financial compensation for the loss of the Papal States. The Lateran Pacts are three different treaties: a 27-article “Treaty of conciliation”, a 3-article financial “Convention” annex and a 45-article “Concordat”. The scope of the agreement is declared in the beginning of the Treaty of conciliation: it reports the convenience among the parties by eliminating the struggles among Italian State and Holy See, pursuing a definitive and stable relationship among them and giving absolute independence in the mission of the Vatican Church. It is said that Holy See has full and international sovereignty and owns the full property of the Vatican City together with jurisdiction in its matters: “The Holy See and Italy have recognized the desirability of eliminating every existing reason for dissension between them by arriving at a definitive settlement of their reciprocal relations, one which is consistent with justice and with the dignity of the two Parties and which, by assuring to the Holy See in a permanent manner a position in fact and in law which guarantees it absolute independence for the fulfillment of its exalted mission in the world, permits the Holy See to consider as finally and irrevocably settled the “Roman Question”, which arose in 1870 by the annexation of Rome to the Kingdom of Italy under the Dynasty of the House of Savoy; Since, in order to assure the absolute and visible independence of the Holy See, it is required that it be guaranteed an indisputable sovereignty even in the international realm, it has been found necessary to create under special conditions Vatican City, recognizing the full ownership and the exclusive and absolute power and sovereign jurisdiction of the Holy See over the same; His Holiness the Supreme Pontiff Pius XI and His Majesty Victor Emanuel III King of Italy have agreed to conclude a Treaty, appointing for that purpose two Plenipotentiaries, namely, on behalf of His Holiness, His Eminence Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, his Secretary of State, and on behalf of His Majesty, His Excellency Sir Benito Mussolini, Prime Minister and Head of Government” (see: https://www.vaticanstate.va/phocadownload/lawsdecrees/LateranTreaty.pdf). The treaty has four different annexes: • Map and extension of Vatican City-State (SCV); • List and consistency of the buildings with extraterritorial privilege and exemption from expropriation and taxes; • Financial convention agreed on as a definitive settlement of the claims of the Holy See following the loss in 1870 of its territories and property; • Concordat regulating relations between the Catholic Church and the Italian State. Among the rules, it is important to underline the following articles of the Treaty: • Unique Catholic religion in the Italian State (1); • Unique authority of Holy See in religion concerns (4); • Pope identified as the Governor of the Church (8); • End of the Roman Question (26).
112
L. D’Ottavi
The concordat states that the “Spiritual power” is limitless and that Rome must be preserved as Eternal City. The Pope is pledged to perpetual neutrality in international relations and to abstention from mediation in a controversy unless specifically requested by all parties. Since 1871, the Holy See refused to accept any offer by the Italian Government until the agreements of the Lateran Treaty and the Church organization considered themselves as prisoners in a small portion of area inside Rome named the Vatican. To commemorate the successful conclusion of the negotiations, the Italian governor Mussolini commissioned “Via della Conciliazione” (Road of the Conciliation), which would symbolically link the Vatican City to the heart of Rome, and the railway connection, through a bridge called “Viadotto del Gelsomino”, from Italian “S. Pietro” station to the “Vatican” station in the Holy See premises, which is still the shortest international link among two states.
3
Juridical Nature of the Public Contract and Economical Aspects
Since the definition of the agreement known as Lateran Pacts, many historians and law experts investigated the nature of the Treaty: according to some of them, it was an international treaty among Italian Kingdom and Holy See while others believed it was something new, a sort of new entity separated from both Italian State and Catholic Church (third government theory). Also different theories were elaborated going through a deep analysis regarding the scope of the Treaty: the “teoria del privilegio” (privilege’s theory), according to which the Church had finally obtained a special status and some financial provisions in order to compensate the end of Vatican Kingdom; the “teoria contrattuale” (contract’s theory) which underlined the nature of a deal among the two entities from different perspectives concerning both power and economical aspects. One-third doctrine (Schiappoli 2018; Wernz 1937) describes the Lateran Pacts as a bilateral and public agreement that was firstly reached through a negotiation among parties but became enforceable only after the publication of law in the Italian Government. This theory in particular points out that only the Italian State has full jurisdiction which can give a binding value to a moral agreement among the two entities. According to the authors, art. 45 of the Concordat does not recognize the value of an international treaty but underlines the conclusion of an agreement that will be enforceable through mutual ratification and in particular the publication of the Italian law: “The present Concordat shall come into force by exchange of the ratifications at the same time as the Treaty between the two High Parties for the elimination of “the Roman Question”. So, the whole Treaty acquired juridical effects only after the Laws n. 810 27 May 1929 and n. 887 30 November 1939.
The Value of Contracts in a Long-Term Context …
113
The content of art. 44 is also important, as it underlines the value of a long-term contract with the Lateran Treaty establishing that “If any difficulty shall arise in the future concerning the interpretation of the present Concordat, the Holy See and Italy shall proceed by a common examination to a friendly solution”.
4
Italian Constitution’s Recognition (1947) and “Villa Madama” Agreement (1984)
When the Lateran Treaty was undersigned, the Italian Government was ruled by a monarchy and a dictatorship which ended in 1944 after the Second World War. In 1948, the Italian Government turned into a democratic Republic and the Italian Constitution, enacted by the Constituent Assembly on 22 December 1947, had to recognize the unique role of the Catholic Church among other religions in a liberal state. In the Constitution, Italian State and Catholic Church are both independent and sovereign in its own activity. Also the “Carta Costituzionale” establishes freedom of religion providing for all kind of spiritual thought the right of self-organization within the Italian law while opening to set up specific agreements with the Italian State; in this terms, Article 7 of Constitution provides a special status to the Catholic Church given by the Lateran Treaty of 1929 which can be emended without requiring an approval of constitutional law. From a juridical point of view, it is important to underline that the agreement was not only fully recognized but, giving a particular value to the Lateran Treaty (art. 45 of the concordat), each modification could be adopted without the complex procedure provided for revising the Constitution. The Lateran Treaty continued to be unmodified until a new agreement was reached in 1984, named “Accordo di Villa Madama” or “Concordato bis”. The new agreement, which does not overrule the whole Lateran Treaty, originated in order to take into consideration some aspects concerning the Catholic religion and the necessity to consider also different religions in a democratic State. In fact, the Treaty was later modified by a new agreement between Church and State in 1984. In this circumstance, both parties agreed to the following declaration: “The principle of the Catholic religion as the sole religion of the Italian State, originally referred to by the Lateran Pacts, shall be considered to be no longer in force”. Only in that moment, the sole state-supported religion of Italy ended; at the same time, the original state financial provision was replaced by a personal income tax called “otto per mille” (8‰ of tax incomes) also granted for other religious organizations. The revised concordat set up, for the first time, some rules for Catholic marriages which, if registered as particular contracts, can provide some duties and patrimonial consequences ruled by Italian civil code. The same happens in case of declaration
114
L. D’Ottavi
of “nullity of marriage” by the ecclesiastical court named “Tribunale della Sacra Rota”, which is different from ordinary “divorce” not possible for Catholic marriages. The recognition in the Italian State of titles of nobility granted by the Holy See was abolished as, since the birth of Italian Republic, those kinds of prerogatives could not be legally considered. Those modifications were a result of a debate in the Italian Society during 1970– 1980 which led Vatican and Italian State to confirm the original Concordat, thus introducing new agreements which took into account the development in society and also in the vision of a State open to different forms of religions but always recognizing the strong role of Catholic Church in Italy.
5
What We Can Learn from Concordat’s Experience
Some useful lessons can be learned through the analysis of the Concordat over 90 years from the signature. First of all, it is important to consider that the Concordat is a long-term agreement (LTA) undersigned by two different parties, not only for the statutory scopes of the singular entities but also for the different juridical nature of the proponents; in fact, Holy See could not be considered as a State in a proper manner, because of lack of jurisdiction and also deficit of power originated since the foundation of Italian State since 1870. This is a crucial characteristic of the agreement which is rather unique in the history of international treaties. Moreover, it is also remarkable to underline the “win-win” attitude in terms of negotiation that both representatives of the two parties have had through the willingness of resolving the “Roman issue”. The Italian State, in fact, could not gain political consensus without Catholics which also have a politic influence which, later, became a strong party called “Democrazia Cristiana”. The Holy See, at the opposite, had the necessity to obtain a sort of “redemption” in front of the Italian Monarchy in order to justify the loss of material power and the prosecution in the spiritual role of guiding the Catholic religion. There were also economical aspects that needed to be solved in order to compensate bilaterals gains and losses and to create more value on both sides. Also, the necessity of a stable situation or necessity in balance of power for both negotiators must be taken into account if we assume that, since 50 years from 1870, Rome was yet a former capital of the Italian State but not from a substantial point of view. The idea besides the concordat was in fact that the Eternal City had to be considered as having a new international guiding role also from an outside view, after the Roman Empire and the Church Empire that lasted for centuries. It is truly conceivable that, under these pre-conditions, an agreement named “Concordat” could represent the best win-win perspective for both parties.
The Value of Contracts in a Long-Term Context …
115
But the revolutionary idea in which the Treaty showed one of the best agreements which paved the way for a long and not discussed partnership was the vision in a complete new invention of the mission acknowledged by both parties. In fact, in giving to both entities a different slice of power represented the remarkable difference if compared to past attempts to solve the Roman issue: the strength of the Concordat is, in other terms, to understand the new context and to create conditions, for both parties, is having a modern vision of two modern States, open minded to the changes that they have to face in a complex thus challenging century. So, while the Italian State needed to reinvent its mission and to appear as a secular institution towards the religious organization, the Catholic Church needed to modify the steady non-compromising approach used in the past and to open up to the world, thus maintaining and reinforcing the international role of teaching and promoting its values—so-called evangelizzazione. This strong identification of the two fields of interest is the sparkle that allowed both parties to purchase an agreement which could satisfy both different interests in that historical moment and also in further decades. On referring to nowadays business negotiations, it is useful to underline the mutual understanding of the zone of potential agreement, ZOPA, using a specific term of Harvard School of negotiation (Fisher and Shapiro 2005; Shonk 2020), which was understood by both parties: from the Holy See side, the ZOPA was represented by the necessity of acquiring or maintaining the power in representing the religion guide at a worldwide level and also unique in the Italian State; from the Italian Monarchy side, the ZOPA was identified by assuming that the material power in ruling the nation was only a task of the national government, while the Church could gain this exclusive role of guide only in religion matter. There is no doubt that the Lateran Treaty can be considered as one of the best agreements in government negotiations and still could be one of the best examples in this particular field.
6
Nowadays Local and Global Challenges: Towards a New Concordat?
Nowadays, the lesson learned from the Concordat and, above all, the long and stable duration of the deal can be and can be seen very useful in an international framework, especially in dealing with government-to-government agreements (Terzi 2013). Negotiators can assume that sitting at the table having a clear vision of the own and the counterpart objectives is crucial, and the only way in which it is possible to gain advantages is by maintaining a flexible approach to the goal. In other terms is not only important to define, from the beginning, the best result but also to imagine a different scale of solutions in order to purchase a powerful and durable agreement (Salacuse 1991).
116
L. D’Ottavi
In that extent, the Holy See was able to imagine that, instead of attempts on rekeeping the power to rule a State, it was better to maintain the monopoly in teaching religion and values in the Italian State and to obtain the power to promote its values at a worldwide level. Moreover, the agreement was also significant from a financial side, as the Church obtained relevant compensations by the loss of its lands and its jurisdiction. Nowadays, and after the 1984 revision, the question concerning the single municipal tax exemption granted by Italy to Holy See is still present not only on religion estates but also in commercial activities. The position is strongly opposed by the owners of commercial activities outside of religion estates. Recently, the European Court (decision on Judgment in Joined Cases C-622/16 P C-623/16 P and C-624/16 P) recalls that the adoption of an order to recover unlawful aid (as the tax exemption for commercial activities by the Vatican) is the logical and normal consequence of a finding that it is unlawful. Admittedly, the EU Commission cannot require the recovery of aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of EU law, such as the principle that “no one is obliged to do the impossible”. However, the Court points out that the recovery of unlawful aid may be regarded as objectively and absolutely impossible only where the Commission finds, following a scrupulous examination, that two conditions are satisfied, namely that the difficulties relied on by the Member State concerned genuinely exist and that there are no alternative methods of recovery. Now, the Italian State is obliged to reconsider its position on tax exemption for commercial activities related to Holy See which derives directly from the Lateran Treaty. In that field, it could be possible to renegotiate a new and “third” concordat by reaching a new compromise among the Italian State and the Church in order to maintain stable relationships also at a European Level and, maybe, to reconsider the tax law principles. After two thousand years since Church foundation and 90 years since Lateran Treaty Rome, the Eternal City, could still be at the cradle of negotiation activities that could modify international juridical frameworks always assuring a long-term agreement for secular entities.
References Forchielli, G. (1936). Teoria del diritto ecclesiastico concordatario. Studi in onore di Francesco Scaduto, cit. (Vol. I, p. 389 ss). Fisher, R., & Shapiro, D. (2005). Beyond reason: Using emotions as you negotiate. Harvard University. Lateran Treaty. https://www.vaticanstate.va/phocadownload/laws-decrees/LateranTreaty.pdf. Salacuse, J. (1991, May 24). Making global deals. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Schiappoli, D. (2018). Sulla natura giuridica del concordato. Stato e chiese, rivista telematica. https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/statoechiese/article/view/9792.
The Value of Contracts in a Long-Term Context …
117
Shonk, K. (2020). How to find the ZOPA in business negotiations. https://www.pon.harvard.edu/ daily/business-negotiations/how-to-find-the-zopa-in-business-negotiations/. Terzi, C. (2013). Review of long-term agreement in procurement in the United Nation Systems. Geneva: UN. Wernz, F. X. (1937). Ius canonicum. Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana. Wikipedia Contributors. (2019, November 10). Lateran treaty. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web: 26 January 2020.
Luigi D’Ottavi is inhouse lawyer of the capital city of Rome, Italy, with specific expertise in public contract, transport and urban law. He is the author of articles in the railway sector and photographer of ancient and modern architecture.
Creativity in Purchasing— What a Team Can Do Nadine Kiratli
1
Introduction
1.1 Purchasing: A Profession in Motion Confronted with challenges brought about by global economic shifts and sustainability pressures, chief executive officers (CEO) increasingly invite chief procurement officers (CPO) to take over the wheel and steer through or around supply market volatility, supply chain disruption, and rising costs of raw materials (Accenture 2011). Times could not be better for purchasing to prove its worth to the business. But are CPOs and their purchasing organizations really doing enough to help their organizations deal with all of this? Certainly, since its establishment as a profession in the early twentieth century, purchasing has undergone a metamorphosis from a shunned, back-office function to a well-recognized, internally integrated business partner. As such, purchasing has continuously been professionalizing its organization and kept introducing purchasing tools and processes, all with the aim of creating value and a competitive advantage for the enterprise. Category management, formalization of the sourcing process, spend analysis, adoption of a cost-orientation, supplier relationship programs, and early supplier involvement in innovation are only some examples to illustrate that purchasing has been exerting effort to emphasize its role as a strategic business partner. Surely, cost reduction and cost avoidance are still the top priority of CPOs (Hackett Group 2016)—but the way savings are generated has transformed. Pressured for continuous bottom-line improvements, buyers must save costs in more compelling, strategic ways including, for instance, working capital expenditure improvements, payment term renegotiations, digitizing purchasing N. Kiratli (&) Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 F. Schupp and H. Wöhner (eds.), The Nature of Purchasing, Management for Professionals, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43502-8_5
119
120
N. Kiratli
processes, and reverse-engineering of cost structures (Forbes 2015). Today, purchasing professionals collaborate with internal stakeholders as part of sourcing teams to develop disruptive sourcing strategies required to sustain, and even increase, bottom-line results. More recently, purchasing is also being held accountable for driving top-line results through proactive fueling of innovation. Purchasing professionals work together with key suppliers as part of co-innovation teams to collectively generate and select ideas for successful commercialization. This brief snapshot of purchasing’s role as an increasingly strategic, corporate discipline suggests that CPOs and their staff are considerably contributing to companies’ competitive advantage in turbulent economic times. And yet, many purchasing organizations struggle to live up to stakeholders’ heightened expectations accompanying the strategic uplift. While teams—composed of internal only or also external stakeholders—are the most appropriate form to tackle problems that are sourcing-related but carry business-wide or even supply chain-wide implications, success is not guaranteed. Many teams fail or fall short of expectations. According to a survey by Deloitte (2016), 62% of CPOs do not believe that their sourcing teams have the skills and capabilities to deliver their purchasing strategy and expected outcomes. In addition, fewer organizations benefit from supplier innovation input: 42% in 2011 compared to 35% in 2012 (State of Flux 2012). Even though tapping supplier innovation is a designated purchasing objective for 55% of global CPOs (Hackett Group 2016), most purchasing organizations still lack the necessary capabilities. Put simply, in times of increasing competition, consolidating supply markets, political turmoil, environmental pressures, and increasingly complex sourcing environments, many purchasing initiatives struggle to create top- as well as bottom-line value for the business.
1.2 Team Creativity: The Key to Sustained Value Creation in Purchasing In search of an explanation for these deficiencies and their resolution, recent popular business press and pioneering scholars point to creativity as the key in purchasing—or rather the lack thereof. Creativity is commonly defined as the development of novel and useful ideas or solutions that are ready to be put into practice (Amabile 1996). Contrary to common perception people might have of creativity, it is not the ability to create ideas out of nothing (Amabile 1998). Instead, creativity requires the meaningful, novel recombination and application of existing, relevant knowledge to capitalize on an opportunity or solve a specific problem (Ritter et al. 2012). As individuals are usually not in possession of all relevant knowledge to do so, creative problem-solving and solution-finding often involve the collaboration of individuals within collectives such as workgroups, taskforces or cross-functional and cross-enterprise teams (Perry-Smith 2006). With most purchasing-related work carried out by and in teams, the ability to think out of the box together with other relevant stakeholders—to be collectively creative—is
Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do
121
essential for next-generation purchasing professionals to remain key players in the value-creation game (Busch 2013; Giunipero et al. 2005; Teague 2014). Nowadays many strategic sourcing problems are not simply tough or persistent —they can be regarded as “wicked” (Camillus 2008). According to Rittel and Webber (1973), there are at least ten distinguishing properties of a wicked problem, among them: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
There is no definitive formulation of a wicked problem, There are no criteria that tell when a solution has been found, Solutions are not true-or-false but good-or-bad, There is no immediate and no ultimate test of a solution, Every solution is a “one-shot operation,” Every wicked problem is unique.
Purchasing’s wicked task of creating value for the business through devising disruptive sourcing strategies can further be categorized along two dimensions (Fig. 1). First, they score high on plurality. That is, opportunities for creating value are highly dispersed within and outside an organization so that a multitude of stakeholders is required to identify and capitalize on them (Chapman et al. 1997). Second, purchasing decisions score high on complexity as they can be multifaceted in nature, pervading and affecting the entire organization. Developing adequate solutions to wicked sourcing challenges requires collective efforts, pooling relevant knowledge and expertise within and across organizational boundaries where needed (Fisher and Amabile 2009). In short, solving wicked problems requires collective, creative efforts of those involved.
Fig. 1 Value creation in purchasing: a wicked problem (author’s own figure)
122
N. Kiratli
1.3 Creativity in Purchasing: Establishing the Research Agenda True, creativity as such is not a new phenomenon—the era of creativity essentially began with humankind setting foot on the planet. Creating new ideas for solving problems is an integral and decisive feature of homo sapiens. Some individuals are natural creative, others have to work hard to activate their creative capabilities and imagination, and yet others will rarely or never have that creative spark. There are scientific debates—especially among neuroscientists, geneticists, and anthropologists—about whether creativity is an innate trait or rather nurtured by upbringing and education. But this is beyond the scope of this chapter. The point of this piece is threefold. First, it gives an introduction of the notion of creativity and its relevance for the purchasing profession as well as an account of extant and relevant literature. Second, it summarizes the main findings of early research into creativity in teams within the purchasing context. Third, it provides researchers with inspiration and a point of reference to conduct future research on creativity and managers with an understanding of how to manage and lead sourcing teams for maximum creative outcomes. In that context, a few essential questions are addressed. Why is creativity needed in purchasing? How to manage for creativity in sourcing teams? How to lead for creativity sourcing teams? Where and when does creativity matter? If research is to find adequate answers to these questions, those working with and being affected by the phenomenon of creativity in purchasing need to be heard. That is why all answers have been derived following rigorous, scientific practices, and by involving individuals as well as teams from different industries. In a series of research projects, data has been collected in the form of desk research, personal interviews via telephone or in person, focus groups with invited participants, workshops, and surveys. In the following sections, the findings will be summarized and the main conclusions drawn.
2
Why Is Creativity Needed in Purchasing?
2.1 The Trigger for Research on Creativity in Purchasing At the outset of this research journey in 2012 stood one fundamental question: How can purchasing professionals create value? This question has been and remains fiercely debated among purchasing professionals and scholars alike. Many different ideas, perspectives, and visions on “how to” exist, ranging from engaging supply partners more intensively in internal processes over connecting better with internal stakeholders all the way to updating the skillset and competencies of purchasing professionals. In a series of conversations with CPOs and purchasing managers at various conferences, during workshops and company visits one element kept coming back: the need to collectively solve problems! According to them, purchasing’s ability to create value strongly depends on the profession’s ability to
Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do
123
connect with others to develop new and relevant solutions that work. In other words, value creation in purchasing demands collective creativity. A survey conducted among 141 purchasing professionals within the NEVI network (the Dutch Association for Purchasing Management) in 2013 helped to further substantiate the relevance of creativity and its meaning in purchasing. Nearly 70% of respondents agreed that creativity is important in the purchasing and supply management context. Asked for the extent to which their current job requires creativity, around 45% indicate that their job requires some creativity and 40% indicate that a large extent of creativity is required to carry out their current job. Respondents were also asked to explain in their own words what creativity means to them in their current job. An analysis of respondents’ definitions returned the following working definition: generating and selecting novel and meaningful solutions together with purchasing colleagues and internal stakeholders as well as with suppliers. This definition not only captures the collective and social nature of creativity as already pointed out in pre-survey conversations with CPOs and purchasing managers. It also illustrates the pluralistic nature of problems and challenges within purchasing and confirms their categorization as wicked problems. Figure 2 outlines three examples of such collective, creative efforts in purchasing.
2.2 Three Reasons Why Creativity Matters There are at least three specific reasons that justified research on creativity in purchasing. The first is that we live in a VUCA world. That is, in a world full of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. It is in this very VUCA world that purchasing managers have to find the best source of supply for their raw materials, components, and services. The VUCA world is full of wicked problems whose resolution demands collective creative efforts. Second, and related to the VUCA world, we live in times with change occurring at a breathtaking pace. Following Heraclitus, “change is the only constant in life.” We thus need to find strategies and ways to deal with constant change. One potent way is to critically reflect on the skill set of purchasing professionals to subsequently update it accordingly. In its Future of Jobs Report, the World Economic Forum regularly ranks creativity among the top-five skills demanded in the future and predicted it to be among the top-three competencies for 2020, only topped by critical thinking and complex problem-solving. Creativity equips and empowers purchasing professionals to anticipate, recognize, create, and seize opportunities. Purchasing professionals of the future are ambidextrous, they can engage in left as well as right brain activities. That is, they are experts in their field and, at the same time, possess creative capabilities. Third, purchasing is increasingly involved in innovation activities within and outside organizational boundaries. As creativity is the fuel for innovation, purchasing professionals need to understand what creativity is and how it works. To aid this understanding, the next section takes a closer look into the conceptualization of creativity by breaking it down into manageable elements before zooming in on team creativity.
124
N. Kiratli
Example 1: Identifying the Purchasing Need at an Oil & Gas Company A sourcing team of a global oil & gas player was charged with identifying suppliers that would provide larger vessels to ship water from the mainland to one of the company’s drilling platforms – the water is critical for operating the platform as it is used to cool the drill heads. When working together with several colleagues from Procurement, R&D, and Operations, the team started to scrutinize the actual purchase need in this project. The team realized that the actual need was not larger vessels with bigger tanks to carry more water – but in fact more water. Drawing on the diverse functional expertise of team members, the team quickly checked the potential for drilling a hole to source groundwater. After approval from relevant stakeholders, the team took action to implement the solution, thereby avoiding huge amounts of costs and delivering a quick sourcing solution inhouse. Example 2: Buying Protective Clothing at a Chemicals Company The corporate sourcing team of a global chemicals company was confronted with the task of buying protective work gear (e.g., helmets, jackets, safety shoes) for their plant workers. Instead of applying the traditional practice of competitive bidding to reduce the number suppliers and negotiate framework agreements with the few remaining suppliers, the team pursued a more holistic solution by drawing on diverse functional knowledge of the colleagues from Finance and Accounting. By accepting slightly higher prices and selecting best quality suppliers, the team managed to simultaneously negotiate far lower insurance fees for occupational injury of workers with the insurance company. Savings realized from lower insurance fees far exceeded savings that would have otherwise been realized by negotiating lower prices for protective clothing. Example 3: Creative procurement practices trigger supply chain innovation Catalysts, substances that cause or accelerate a chemical reaction without itself being affected, are essential for operating refineries and petro-chemical complexes. The corporate sourcing team of a global oil producer was asked to reorganize the enterprise category for catalysts – currently managed on a local level – to improve sourcing effectiveness and secure supply. After some spend and market analysis the team decided to centralize spend at the global level. In a first step, all high level activities for sourcing of catalysts – including associated services, contract management as well as strategic tendering – were placed at the global level to leverage spend. In a second step, the team started to revise the purchasing strategy and standardized the purchasing model by incorporating technology into their contracting and procurement strategy. These changes enabled the company to better identify and have quicker access to latest technology and R&D developments in the market. In the past, suppliers had to contact procurement managers on a local level – getting approval for the use of catalysts in different regions was tedious. With the category organized at the global level, it was easier to certify a supplier’s products for use in different regions and applications within the company. The company’s current suppliers were thus more interested in entering into innovation relationships with the oil producer, providing readily access to their valuable knowledge on catalysts. As a result, other suppliers were encouraged to also change their profile and adopt a new, innovation-driven business model. Centralizing spend and employing technology-based purchasing thus did not only change the profile of own suppliers and lifted the business with them – creative change of one customer company triggered a whole new industry standard
Fig. 2 Examples of creativity in purchasing (author’s own figure)
3
How to Manage for Creativity in Sourcing Teams?
3.1 Creativity as a Process Versus an Output Effective management of creativity requires an understanding of its individual components and how they relate to each other. In that respect, it is essential to distinguish between creativity as an output, that is how novel and useful the idea is, and creativity as a process, that is how the idea is generated (see Kiratli 2016). If this distinction is not made, any action or attempt targeted at influencing creativity in sourcing teams is doomed to fail or at least expected to show less than satisfactory results. Managing and measuring a team’s output versus a team’s process while performing a task are two entirely different ball games.
Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do
125
Definitions of creativity as an output are consistent and mainly involve the dimensions of novelty and usefulness (Amabile 1983; Im and Workman 2004; Wang et al. 2008). The novelty of an idea implies that it is original and differs from conventional practice, while usefulness indicates that the idea provides benefits to the parties concerned. Or stated differently, “ideas cannot be merely new to be considered creative; they must be somehow appropriate to the problem or task at hand” (Amabile and Fisher 2000). Outputs are typically assessed by experts that are external to the team and knowledgeable of the domain of interest. Process describes how team inputs are transformed into outcomes. This description of process is in line with Hackman’s (1987) normative model of group effectiveness according to which team inputs are transformed into relevant outcomes by means of interaction between team members. This is also referred to as the input-process-outcome (IPO) framework. While output is relatively easy to define and measure, it is the behavioral component of creativity—creativity as a process—that remains a black box to both practitioners and academics. At the same time, as its quality and effectiveness determine output, the creative processt probably constitutes the most vital element. Hackman and Morris (1975), for instance, argue that explanations for any particular input–output relationship are hiding in the team’s interaction process itself. The authors emphasize a need for “interventions that will help group members learn how to deal effectively with issues of individual differences within the group, and to create a climate that supports and facilitates learning and sharing of learning” (1975, pp. 37). Despite the recognition of the team process being vital to creative output, extant research on the creative process by which individuals act collectively to produce creative outcomes or solve problems as a team remains scattered, anecdotal, and overly context-specific (Anderson et al. 2014; Mumford 2000). A major reason for this might be the fact that the management of creativity—in any context—is complex and paradoxical, demanding a fine balance between formal control and imaginative freedom (Amabile and Pillemer 2012; Mumford et al. 2002; Shalley and Gilson 2004). This is also an apparent challenge during collective, creative solution-finding in sourcing teams. Buyers and non-procurement stakeholders from within or outside the organization must develop a shared understanding for effective teamwork without losing sight of their targets. This proves to be a difficult undertaking, considering that team members have different priorities, functional conflict, and diverging perspectives (Driedonks et al. 2010; Englyst et al. 2008).
3.2 Creative Climates in Sourcing Teams Albeit great potential of the team approach for superior performance, teams thus do not always provide a guarantee for success. On the contrary, many team initiatives often fail to deliver expected results. In an attempt to shed light on possible sources of failure, Moses and Åhlström (2008) identified typical problems encountered by cross-functional sourcing teams and co-innovation teams with suppliers. Among
126
N. Kiratli
them are the lack of a holistic view, misaligned functional goals, over-reliance on standard processes, and inefficient decision-making by team members. At sight of such difficulties, Englyst et al. (2008) criticize the lack of theoretical insights and guidance on specific processes governing effective, creative problem-solving in teams. Recent advancements of Driedonks et al. (2010, 2014) reflect emerging scholarly interest for developing such a team perspective in PSM research. With firms increasingly depending on the creative potential of teams (Fischer et al. 2005; Fisher and Amabile 2009), developing such a perspective is mandatory. Against this backround, Kiratli et al. (2016) borrowed from work-unit climate research to advance the understanding of collective creativity in purchasing. Organizational behavior literature suggests that the group climate underlying teamwork is crucial for effective team performance (Anderson et al. 2004; Ekvall 1996). Group or work-unit climate is defined as the shared perceptions of team members regarding policies, procedures, and practices that are rewarded and supported in a specific work setting (Zohar and Tenne-Gazit 2008). As such a climate develops, individual team members may become more comfortable to experiment with new forms of behavior such as creativity and feel more confident to engage in the risky and anxiety-arousing activities required to exchange and extend knowledge and skills in a team setting (Hackman and Morris 1975). A number of properties make work-unit climate an appropriate theoretical lens for explaining how relevant creative behavior originates bottom-up within a team: 1. The process by which such climates arise is dynamic in nature, through team member interaction and socialization (Hackman 1987). 2. Climates can be facet-specific (De Jong et al. 2004; Schneider et al. 1992). That is, climate constructs can be directed at a specific goal or activity and at a specific level (Schneider et al. 2013). For an investigation of the collective sensemaking processes, that is, the process by which people give meaning to experience and cues collected from their immediate surroundings, in teams during creative problem-solving, the focal activity is creativity and the project team constitutes the level of analysis. 3. Climates are conceptualized as the shared perceptions of individual team members so that it is possible to measure it on the individual level and then aggregate individual measures to the team level. This is what is referred to as the referent-shift consensus model (Chan 1998). 4. Climates can be related to numerous important outcomes at the individual, group, and organizational level (Patterson et al. 2005). For instance, previous research has shown that climate constructs are appropriate for predicting expected performance outcomes such as creative outcomes (Si and Wei 2012) or general firm performance (Baer and Frese 2003). In a similar fashion, a sourcing team’s creative climate can be related to relevant outcomes such as creative performance and financial performance. Kiratli et al. (2016) define team creativity climate (TCC) as team members’ shared perceptions of their joint policies, procedures, practices with respect to
Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do
127
Table 1 Measurement scalea for team creativity climate (table compiled by author; Kiratli et al. 2016) 1. In our team, we are open to each other’s views and ideas 2. In our team, we strive to think across departmental boundaries 3. In our team, we actively seek out each other for constructive discussions 4. In our team, we encourage each other to try new ways of doing things 5. In our team, we are comfortable with exploring unfamiliar ideas and perspectives 6. In our team, we openly share thoughts without fear of rejection 7. In our team, we build on each other’s ideas 8. In our team, we take each contribution seriously 9. In our team, we promote behaviors for a trustful environment a Measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = fully disagree to 5 = fully agree
finding creative solutions. Following prudent scale development procedures, the authors conceptualized and developed a measurement scale to capture the creative process of sourcing teams by means of a one-dimensional nine-item construct (see Table 1). The authors conclude that the measurement scale provides a reliable and valid tool for capturing the collective, creative sensemaking process of sourcing teams. In addition, relatively high Pearson correlations on a sample of 52 sourcing teams reveal that team creativity climate relates positively to both, members’ evaluations of their team’s creative performance as well as team leader’s evaluations of creative team performance. This is indicative for the explanatory power of the team creativity climate construct.
4
How to Lead for Creativity Sourcing Teams?
An understanding of how the creative process within sourcing teams takes shape and how it can be measured allows leaders to proactively and purposefully manage team members for maximum creative performance of developed ideas and solutions. Although research has addressed the issue of leadership for collective creativity, no consensus exists regarding the most optimal leadership style for stimulating problem-solving in teams (Isaksen 1992; Sirkwoo 2015; van Rossum 2007). One of the primary reasons might be that extant research has not sufficiently accounted for the different phases of the creative process, each of which potentially demands a different leadership style to promote a team’s creative performance (McKinsey 2015). A survey conducted among 50 purchasing and supply chain management professionals as described in the following confirms this. Respondents were presented with a randomized list of behaviors corresponding to one of three leadership styles: • Transactional leadership, where leaders focus on supervision, organization as well as performance and promoting compliance through both rewards and punishments.
128
N. Kiratli
• Facilitative leadership, which entails empowering members to work together and helping members to contribute, speak up, and share ideas. • Transformational leadership, which is about identifying needed change, creating a vision, and executing change in tandem with members. Based on their own experience during past teamwork involving problemsolving, respondents were asked to pick from the list those leadership behaviors that in their perspective best foster collective creativity in teams. For the purpose of the study, the creative process was described following four stages: 1. Idea generation: also referred to as ideation: generation of a possibly large set of alternative ideas 2. Idea assessment: early assessment of ideas to decide whether an idea is worthwhile pursuing 3. Idea revision: refinement of an idea based on the assessment of requirements, context, resources, etc. 4. Idea selection: choosing the best solution from a short-list of ideas for implementation While each leadership style appeared to be somewhat relevant in all stages, results confirm that one leadership style is typically dominating in each stage of the creative process (Fig. 3). Specifically, while leaders should apply a facilitative leadership style across all phases of the creative process, respondents indicated a need for an emphasis on transformational leadership during the ideation stage as compared to a more transactional approach toward the idea selection stage. These results indicate that, especially during the divergent phase of the creative process,
Fig. 3 Dominant leadership styles in the creative process (% of respondents indicating leadership style to fit best the respective stage of the creative process) (author’s own figure)
Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do
129
teams perform best when empowered, facilitated, and supported by their team leader. Once ideas are being revised and the team converges in order to select the best solution, the team relies on a somewhat more directive leader to make sure “the job gets done.” Bottom-line: team leaders must attend more closely and carefully to the different requirements of collective creativity at different stages of the creative process and adapt their leadership behavior accordingly. That is, leaders need to become ambidextrous themselves for leading teams towards creative outcomes.
5
Where and When Does Creativity Matter?
5.1 Mapping Creativity in Purchasing All insights gained into the creative process of sourcing teams are invaluable if one does not know the context in which the team operates. Since teams are embedded into an organizational context, they are thus subject to pressures, contingencies, and requirements of their immediate surroundings. There is a paucity of knowledge about the specific contexts in which creative problem-solving and solution-finding can lead to valuable outcomes. The extent to which creativity is relevant varies such that even in one and the same organization, creativity might matter in some but not in other situations. A better understanding of where and when creativity can be applied is crucial to help organizations become more systematic and strategic in encouraging creativity for value-creation purposes. Hence, a systematic overview of where and when creativity matters in the purchasing context is essential to allocate time, talent, and resources to where and when creativity matters most. Practitioners tend to rely on processes, tools, and frameworks to formulate sourcing strategies and effectively fulfill corporate objectives. PSM scholars have, therefore, developed models and frameworks to visualize and study different purchasing contexts. For the following set of studies, three prominent frameworks were selected to provide practitioners and scholars with a first insight into where and when creativity can be applied: • Purchasing maturity model, a spreadsheet with different stages of maturity that is determined by a purchasing’s organization scoring on several dimensions, including strategic alignment, supplier relationship management, internal organization, skills, and competences (see van Weele 2009). • Kraljic matrix, developed by Peter Kraljic in 1983, allows segmenting sourcing items into one of four quadrants (strategic, bottleneck, leverage, and routine) along two dimensions, risk and profitability. • Strategic sourcing process, a management tool that maps the distinct stages of the purchasing process and designed to simplify and streamline the purchasing within an organization (see van Weele 2009).
130
N. Kiratli
In order to map creativity across each of these frameworks, two sets of interviews were conducted. The first set of interviews was conducted to assess the impact of creativity in purchasing organizations at different stages of purchasing maturity. The 12 interviewees were purposefully selected based on their level of seniority either in terms of job experience (>10 years) or their position (senior management) to ensure that interview partners would grasp the concept of purchasing maturity and would be able to give an account of the relevance and impact of creativity in their organization (Table 2a). At the beginning of each interview, interviewees assessed their purchasing organization’s maturity level and then reflected on the general atmosphere and perception toward creativity among employees. The second set of interviews was conducted with 12 individuals who were selected according to their experience with and involvement in sourcing teams over a consecutive number of years and across a variety of industries (see Table 2a). The purpose of this set of interviews was to assess whether creativity is more impactful in sourcing certain types of items within the Kraljic matrix and in which stage of the strategic sourcing process creativity occurs. The results of these two sets of interviews are summarized in the following sections. Interviewees had to first recall and describe a sourcing project within which they had experienced a high level of creativity and then categorize the assignment as one of four purchasing situations within the Kraljic portfolio.
5.2 Purchasing Maturity Maturity models have been introduced to track purchasing organizations’ evolvement from a transactional orientation of focusing on price reduction to a value-generating business function that focuses on cost reduction and revenue growth. Each maturity stage prescribes the skills, goals, and approaches an organization employs and fulfills. Higher levels of maturity are equated with more sophisticated approaches toward value creation in terms of cost reduction and revenue growth. In the study, the model served as a guiding framework to systematically investigate whether the occurrence of creativity correlates with one of the “six flavors” of purchasing (Rozemeijer 2008), corresponding to six stages of purchasing maturity (Fig. 4). In other words, does the applicability and appropriateness of creativity as a competence depend on the maturity stage of a purchasing organization? Companies in stages four through six, for instance, are associated with a strategic approach toward purchasing with more need for creative solutions. Does this mean that creativity is only relevant for mature purchasing organizations? Or is creativity a competence that is also relevant for less mature purchasing organizations? Purchasing development models merely serve as a framework to systematically identify and map creativity. As the underlying logic of how creativity relates to purchasing maturity is not clear, no path-dependency was assumed up front. The aim of the study was to build theory, thereby contributing to the competence literature within Purchasing and Supply Management (PSM) and not to
Creativity in Purchasing—What a Team Can Do
131
Table 2 a Interviewees for mapping creativity against purchasing maturity (table compiled by author). b Interviewees for mapping creativity in the strategic sourcing process and the Kraljic matrix (table compiled by author) a No.
Industry
Position
# of employees
Work experience
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Consulting Consulting Consulting Consulting Training Training Training Life science
>100,000 >100,000