243 103 2MB
English Pages 29 [34] Year 2009
The Moods of Indirect Quotation
A n a l e c t a Gorgiana
386 Series Editor George Anton Kiraz
Analecta Gorgiana is a collection of long essays and
short
monographs which are consistently cited by modern scholars but previously difficult to find because of their original appearance in obscure publications. Carefully selected by a team of scholars based on their relevance to modern scholarship, these essays can now be fully utili2ed by scholars and proudly owned by libraries.
The Moods of Indirect Quotation
John Jacob Schlicher
gorgia* press 2009
Gorgias Press LLC, 180 Centennial Ave., Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA www.gorgiaspress.com Copyright © 2009 by Gorgias Press LLC Originally published in All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise without the prior written permission of Gorgias Press LLC. 2009
1
ISBN 978-1-60724-635-0
ISSN 1935-6854
Extract from The ^American Journal of Philology 26 (1905)
Printed in the LTnited States of America
v . — T H E MOODS OF INDIRECT I. The
QUOTATION. 1
Indicative.
It is natural for t h e a v e r a g e a d u l t t o m a k e a distinction a m o n g i d e a s , b e t w e e n t h o s e w h i c h a r e t h e p r o d u c t o f his o w n o b s e r v a t i o n and t h i n k i n g , and t h o s e w h i c h a r e c o m m u n i c a t e d to h i m r e a d y m a d e b y other persons.
I d e a s of the f o r m e r class a r e , as a
m a t t e r of c o u r s e , a l l o w e d to enter the mind w i t h o u t r e s e r v e
and
are a c c e p t e d as true, w h i l e t h o s e of t h e latter class find t h e m i n d o n its g u a r d , as it w e r e , and a r e o n l y a d m i t t e d on e q u a l t e r m s w i t h t h e f o r m e r after a m o r e or less careful s c r u t i n y , if i n d e e d t h e y are a c c e p t e d at ail. this r u l e in p a r t i c u l a r
T o b e sure, t h e r e a r e e x c e p t i o n s t o
cases and under
special
circumstances.
A careful a n d c o n s c i e n t i o u s m a n will b e on t h e alert a g a i n s t t h e s h o r t c o m i n g s o f his o w n m e n t a l a n d sensual p r o c e s s e s , o n t h e o n e h a n d , and l o n g or intimate a s s o c i a t i o n with a n o t h e r p e r s o n and u n i f o r m v e r a c i t y on his part will, on t h e o t h e r h a n d , l e a d o n e t o g r a n t his i d e a s t h e one's own.
same
unquestioning
admission
as
But if w e t a k e into a c c o u n t o n l y t h e a v e r a g e m i n d
in its o r d i n a r y w o r k i n g s , t h o s e conditions, n a m e l y , w h i c h m o u l d l i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e , w e are o b l i g e d t o l o o k u p o n t h e
distinction
b e t w e e n the t w o classes o f ideas as a f u n d a m e n t a l o n e .
The
p r o o f that this v i e w is c o r r e c t is f u r n i s h e d b y t h e w i d e e x t e n t t o w h i c h t h e distinction is r e c o g n i z e d in t h e f o r m s of s p e e c h . F r o m a p s y c h o l o g i c a l point of v i e w w e can r e a d i l y s e e that t h e t w o classes o f i d e a s m u s t affect t h e m i n d in d i f f e r e n t w a y s . F o r e n t i r e l y a p a r t f r o m intentional or u n i n t e n t i o n a l in the s t a t e m e n t s of o t h e r p e r s o n s , their ideas m u s t
falsehoods necessarily,
in a d e g r e e , t a k e u s u n a w a r e s , and a p p e a r s t r a n g e to us, s i n c e 1
T h e w r i t e r is c o n s c i o u s of t h e f a c t t h a t t h e t i t l e a n d h e a d i n g s of t h i s p a p e r
are s o m e w h a t misleading.
I t s m a i n o b j e c t is to a s s i g n t h e L a t i n s u b j u n c t i v e
of i n d i r e c t q u o t a t i o n to its p r o p e r p l a c e as a m o o d , a n d w h a t is s a i d a b o u t t h e i n d i c a t i v e a n d t h e a c c u s a t i v e a n d i n f i n i t i v e is i n t e n d e d o n l y as a s e t t i n g f o r t h e t r e a t m e n t o f t h e s u b j u n c t i v e , a n d as a n a i d i n a c c o m p l i s h i n g t h i s m a i n object.
T h i s w i l l e x p l a i n t h e s k e t c h i n e s s of the t r e a t m e n t in t h e
first
two
d i v i s i o n s o f t h e a r t i c l e , w h i c h are n o t so m u c h c o o r d i n a t e w i t h t h e t h i r d , as p r e p a r a t o r y to it. A p r e l i m i n a r y p a p e r w h i c h b r i e f l y d i s c u s s e d s o m e of t h e p o i n t s t r e a t e d t h i s a r t i c l e w a s p u b l i s h e d in t h e S c h o o l R e v i e w for M a y , 1902.
in
THE MOODS
OF INDIRECT
QUOTA TION.
61
they are the result of a preceding mental experience with which we are, perhaps wholly, unacquainted. Besides, the fact that these various ideas come to us each with a stamp of its own, affected as it is, though ever so slightly, by the permanent or temporary peculiarities of its author, contrasts strongly with the uniformity, as it appears to us, of our own mental and sensual activities. And this lack of harmony in foreign ideas, with each other and with our own, even though the evidence of downright falsehood be lacking, will naturally tend to prevent our minds from feeling the same degree of ease and hospitality toward them which we feel toward ideas of our own production. Natural as all this appears, however, it is nevertheless evident that this distinction between foreign and native ideas as such, has not existed at all times in the history of language. For in addition to those forms of indirect quotation by which this distinction is clearly and consistently made, there are others in which it is not found as an inherent element, but only as an external addition, a sort of afterthought. W e find, namely, that not only the subjunctive, optative and infinitive are used in clauses of quotation, but that the indicative is used also. And in the case of the indicative it is not the mood, but the added verb of saying, which indicates in any way that the speaker is not expressing his own thought but that of someone else. If we strip the mood of its accessories, take it back, in other words, to the time when it stood in an independent clause, we have a form of expression for the foreign idea, which does not differ in the least from that which would be used for a native idea. At that stage, if A said " I saw a bear", B would later express the idea he gets by saying "A saw a b e a r " , exactly as if he had obtained the idea by the use of his own faculties, instead of obtaining it from the statement of A. There must have been a time, therefore, in the mental history of the race, as there is a time in the mental life of a child, when the distinction between meum and tuum in the matter of ideas was not yet clearly made, and when it was not found necessary to distinguish between them in speech. Of course, in any highly developed language we shall not look for this method of quotation in its baldest form outside of the nursery. For the confusion which it would cause between one's own ideas, which we feel to be true, and those of another person, whose veracity may perhaps be very doubtful to one, would be intolerable to the mental habits of a civilized adult. But language
62
AMERICAN
JOURNAL
OF
PHILOLOGY.
is c o n s e r v a t i v e , a n d t h o u g h a f o r m h a s b e c o m e u s e l e s s in i t s e l f , it m a y still b e p a t c h e d a n d p r o p p e d in s u c h a w a y a s t o m a k e it d o service under different and m o r e e x a c t i n g conditions. a b e a r " w o u l d , for e x a m p l e , e a s i l y b e d e s i g n a t e d
" A saw
unmistakably
as t h e s t a t e m e n t o f A , b y t h e a d d i t i o n o f a p a r a t a c t i c v e r b
like
"he
dis-
told
me"
or " h e
said",
and
could thus be clearly
t i n g u i s h e d f r o m all i d e a s b e l o n g i n g t o B h i m s e l f .
A n d in t h i s
n e w f o r m t h e o r i g i n a l i n d i c a t i v e of i n d i r e c t s t a t e m e n t is, in fact, f o u n d w i d e l y u s e d , e v e n in h i g h l y d e v e l o p e d l a n g u a g e s , e s p e c i a l l y in t h e i r c o l l o q u i a l f o r m s .
In E n g l i s h , i n d e e d , t h e d i s a p p e a r a n c e
o f t h e s u b j u n c t i v e h a s o n c e m o r e b r o u g h t t h i s f o r m of q u o t a t i o n to h i g h honor.
W e find it a l s o u s e d f r e e l y in G e r m a n .
In L a t i n
a n d G r e e k , o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , t h e p a r a t a c t i c f o r m as a m e t h o d o f q u o t a t i o n , that is, w i t h t h e v e r b o f s a y i n g o r t h i n k i n g in t h e s e c o n d o r t h i r d p e r s o n , o r in t h e p a s t t e n s e , a p p e a r s t o b e f o u n d o n l y in t h e s l i g h t e s t t r a c e s . 1
S t i l l , in o r a l c o n v e r s a t i o n it m a y
h a v e b e e n u s e d q u i t e e x t e n s i v e l y e v e n in t h e s e l a n g u a g e s . 2 T h i s p a r t i c u l a r f o r m o f i n d i r e c t q u o t a t i o n is c l e a r l y , as w e h a v e stated, an clause
adaptation
to m o r e
of
complex
a
primitive
conditions.
independent
indicative
In its n e w f o r m
satisfies the d e m a n d s of careful t h i n k i n g ,
it f u l l y
since the source
o w n e r s h i p of t h e i d e a is d e f i n i t e l y i n d i c a t e d .
or
N e c e s s a r y as t h e
addition of this paratactic v e r b of s a y i n g was, h o w e v e r , the dev e l o p m e n t o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n a l o n g t h i s line s e e m s t o h a v e b e e n a r r e s t e d in b o t h L a t i n a n d G r e e k .
F o r w e find n o t o n l y a g r e a t
scarcity
even
of
paratactic
forms,
but
the
hypotactic
forms
a p p e a r , in b o t h l a n g u a g e s , at a l a t e r d a t e t h a n w a s t h e c a s e in other constructions.
I n H o m e r , for i n s t a n c e , t h e h y p o t a c t i c f o r m
o f i n d i r e c t q u o t a t i o n w i t h t h e finite v e r b in t h e q u o t e d p a r t , is s t i l l in its first b e g i n n i n g s , 3 a n d in L a t i n it d i d n o t a p p a r e n t l y 1
S e e , f o r e x a m p l e , B e c k e r , B e i o r d n e n d e u. u n t e r o r d n e n d e
pp. 9-20.
detonderunt.
w h e r e the a d d e d v e r b of
s a y i n g or t h i n k i n g
r e l a t i v e nt or wf are o f c o u r s e c o m m o n 3
Satzverbindung,
S o P l i n . E p p . V I I , 27, 13, v e n e r u n t p e r f e n e s t r a s (ita n a r r a t ) in
tunicis albis duo cubantemque 2Cases
find
According
to S c h m i t t ,
Über
is
introduced
by
a
enough.
d. U r s p r . d . S u b s t a n t i v s a t z e s
mit
Relativ-
p a r t i k e l n i m G r i e c h . (p. 70) t h e r e are o n l y 15 c a s e s of the c l a u s e w i t h or;, ¿ f , e t c . u s e d in i n d i r e c t q u o t a t i o n in H o m e r (3 in t h e I l i a d , 1 2 in the O d y s s e y ) . A l l of t h e s e h a v e t h e i n d i c a t i v e , m o r e o v e r , a f t e r past as w e l l as p r e s e n t v e r b s . T h e c l o s e c o n n e c t i o n of
the constructions with
the i n d e p e n d e n t
indicative
o f q u o t a t i o n is a l s o s h o w n b y the f a c t t h a t t h e i r t e n s e s are a l l s t i l l a d j u s t e d t o t h e r e p o r t e r ' s p o i n t of v i e w ( G o o d w i n , M . a n d T . 671 a n d 674). XIV
373-6.
A . J. P .
THE MOODS
OF INDIRECT
QUOTATION.
63
recognition in written speech, so far as the main clause of the quotation is concerned, before the time of the decline. 1 But this backwardness of the hypotactic form of indirect discourse in Latin and Greek was not due to the adequacy or convenience of the independent or paratactic forms of which we spoke above, but rather to the fact that these languages had in the meantime developed another and entirely different method of indirectly quoting foreign words or ideas, namely the accusative and infinitive. II. The Accusative
and
Infinitive.
This construction shows a more vigorous growth and greater adaptability in Latin and Greek than it has in the Germanic languages. T h e two groups of languages are especially distinguished from each other by the wide use which is made of the construction in Latin and Greek with verbs of saying and thinking. Not only that, but it also seems, in the latter languages, to have reached a certain perfection in this wider field at a very early date. W e find, for example, that in Homer there are some 130 cases of it after alone, as against only 15 cases of the clause with ¿is, Sri and similar conjunctions, after all expressions of saying. 2 T h e form in which the accusative and infinitive is found in the earlier authors, in both Latin and Greek, is a very simple one. Its development from the accusative of the direct object is here still quite evident, for there is, as a rule, nothing besides the bare accusative with its added infinitive. Subordinate clauses are rather uncommon. Compact as this early form of the construction is and hardly more cumbersome than the direct object itself, while at the same time performing its function of quotation admirably, it is easy to see how it could, in the general movement from parataxis to hypotaxis, not only hold its own, but seriously threaten the full development and very existence of the more cumbersome paratactic form of quotation which we have just mentioned. In Latin, as we saw, it did, in fact, prevent this development throughout the whole classical period. Now when we find, in Homer and Plautus, that the overwhelmingly prevalent form of the accusative and infinitive was ' F o r an extensive collection of examples, see M a y e n , D e particulis Q u o d , Q u i a , Quoniam, Quomodo, U t pro acc. cum inf. post verba sent, et decl. positis, Diss. K i e l , '89. 2 S c h m i t t , 1. c. [It is noteworthy that oijfii rejects on and ¿if during the classic period. A l s o A . J. P. I V 56 ; X I V 374, X V I 395, X V I I 5 1 7 . — B . L . G . ]
64
AMERICAN
JOURNAL
OF
PHILOLOGY.
a v e r y s i m p l e one, w e will o f c o u r s e n o t a s s u m e that this s i m p l i c i t y n e c e s s a r i l y reflects a l i k e q u a l i t y in t h e u t t e r a n c e o f t h e original speaker.
Neither
does
the
b r e v i t y of t h e
accusative
a n d infinitive p r o v e t h e b r e v i t y o f the original e x p r e s s i o n w h i c h it r e p r o d u c e s .
The
fact is rather that it matters little w h e t h e r
t h e o r i g i n a l s p e e c h be short a n d s i m p l e , or l o n g a n d c o m p l e x . F o r t h e h e a r e r ' s m i n d will n a t u r a l l y retain a n d r e p r o d u c e o n l y t h a t part of it w h i c h h a p p e n s to interest h i m at the time.
And
if, in a d d i t i o n to all this, t h e p e r i o d u n d e r c o n s i d e r a t i o n is o n e in w h i c h h y p o t a x i s h a s not y e t c o m e to be t h e c o m m o n m o d e o f e x p r e s s i o n , t h e form of t h e q u o t a t i o n will o f c o u r s e naturally be simple.1 B u t in t h e c o u r s e o f d e v e l o p m e n t , this p r i m i t i v e and s u b j e c t i v e m e t h o d o f q u o t i n g o n l y that part w h i c h interests the r e p o r t e r , will g i v e w a y to a m o r e o b j e c t i v e m e t h o d w h i c h d o e s fuller j u s t i c e to the e x p r e s s i o n of t h e original s p e a k e r .
T o the s i n g l e c l a u s e
o f the primitive q u o t a t i o n , o t h e r s will n o w b e a d d e d , s u c h as g i v e t h e time, c a u s e or s o m e other c i r c u m s t a n c e w h i c h had b e e n a part o f the o r i g i n a l s p e e c h .
A n d with the necessity o f m a k i n g t h e s e
a d d i t i o n s will c o m e a crisis in the h i s t o r y o f s u c h a c o n s t r u c t i o n as t h e a c c u s a t i v e and infinitive of e a r l y G r e e k and Latin.
For
its future will n e c e s s a r i l y d e p e n d u p o n its a b i l i t y to a d a p t itself t o t h e altered c o n d i t i o n s . We
can still
clearly distinguish
t w o lines a l o n g
which
an
e x t e n s i o n o f t h e s i m p l e a c c u s a t i v e a n d infinitive t o o k p l a c e in the paratactic stage.
T h e e v i d e n c e for one of t h e s e is f u r n i s h e d
b y t h e cases, r a t h e r n u m e r o u s in G r e e k , t h o u g h less s o in L a t i n , w h e r e w e h a v e t h e a c c u s a t i v e a n d infinitive in the s u b o r d i n a t e a s well as the m a i n clauses o f t h e quotation. 2
T h i s can o n l y
m e a n that the o r i g i n a l s i n g l e a c c u s a t i v e and infinitive h a d g r o w n by
the p a r a t a c t i c a d d i t i o n o f other c l a u s e s o f the s a m e f o r m ,
which 1
as
expressed
the
subordinate
i d e a s referred
to.
Such
a
It is e a s y , h o w e v e r , to l a y too m u c h s t r e s s u p o n t h e s t a g e of d e v e l o p m e n t determining absolutely
the
simplicity
or
complexity
of
a
construction.
F o r l i n g u i s t i c f o r m s a r e not o n l y the p r o d u c t o f t h o u g h t , b u t t h e m s e l v e s in t u r n , d e t e r m i n e t h e f o r m of t h e t h o u g h t .
W h e n a construction,
also,
whether
s i m p l e or c o m p l e x , h a s o n c e i n t r e n c h e d i t s e l f in c o m m o n u s a g e , it w i l l
not
r e a d i l y b e o u s t e d f r o m its p o s i t i o n , e v e n t h o u g h a r i v a l c o n s t r u c t i o n
should
b e r e a d y to t a k e its p l a c e .
change
Such a change would mean not only a
o f e x p r e s s i o n , b u t c o u n t l e s s r e a d j u s t m e n t s o f the s p e a k e r ' s h a b i t s o f t h o u g h t , as w e l l . 2
F o r e x a m p l e s cf. K t i h n e r , L a t . G r a m . I I , 1036 ff.
c o m m o n in r e l a t i v e c l a u s e s .
T h e i n f i n i t i v e is e s p e c i a l l y
THE MOODS OF INDIRECT
QUOTATION.
65
m e t h o d of e x t e n d i n g the construction s e e m s for that s t a g e a perfectly natural one. It was not destined to p l a y an important part, h o w e v e r , in the fully d e v e l o p e d l a n g u a g e , a n d its d o o m was s e a l e d , so far as a full d e v e l o p m e n t was c o n c e r n e d , j u s t as s o o n as the subordinate clause b e c a m e the c o m m o n construction for the addition of subsidiary ideas. F o r the connectives w h i c h i n t r o d u c e d t h e s e subordinate clauses w e r e practically e v e r y w h e r e else in L a t i n and G r e e k associated with clauses containing finite f o r m s of the verb. T h e s e c o n d w a y in w h i c h the s i m p l e a c c u s a t i v e a n d infinitive w a s e x t e n d e d so as to include subsidiary clauses, d i d not suffer in its g r o w t h from this obstacle. It illustrates, h o w e v e r , no less beautifully the c a p a c i t y of a l a n g u a g e t o m a k e the most of e x i s t i n g materials, in the process of a d a p t i n g itself to c h a n g e d conditions a n d requirements. W h i l e in the f o r m e r case the simple a c c u s a t i v e a n d infinitive g r e w b y a d d i t i o n s in w h i c h its o w n form was r e p r o d u c e d , it a c c o m p l i s h e d its extension in the latter b y pressing into s e r v i c e its o l d rival, the i n d e p e n d e n t indicative clause of quotation. E x a m p l e s of this c o m p o s i t e formation, t h o u g h v e r y rare, m a y still be found, as for instance in II. X V , 1 7 8 - 1 8 3 : el tU 01 ov hizEsaa* ¿TMrelaeat, aXV a/.(r. 7jCtt6rf:/>OR GOV tY o w e D&erai OI/.OV R/TOF) LAUV OL