Table of contents : Table of Contents Introduction I: IN THE CROSSFIRE The Year 1760: From the Surrender of Quebec City to the Surrender of Montreal The War with Three Names After the Surrender of Quebec City English Reinforcements Murray Begins the March to Montreal The French and Canadiens in Retreat Amherst's Hard March The Indian "Missions" The Fate of Fort Lévis The Oswegatchie conference The Path Is Clear Amherst, Haviland, Murray Vaudreuil's Surrender An Account by Johnson and Amherst The Caughnawaga Conference II: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE SIOUI RULING Murray's "Treaty" and the Courts A Peak of Activity: 1819–24 Stuart's Conclusions The Opinion of Sociologist Léon Gérin Georges E. Sioui Offers His Version The Siouis Spring into Action Submission of a Mysterious Document The Conclusions of the Superior Court A Defeat with the Scent of Victory The Court of Appeal Is Divided This Time, Quebec Appeals Justice Lamer Hears Mr. Larochelle ... ... but Listens to Chief Justice Dickson III: THE MURRAY DOCUMENT AND THE HISTORIANS The Murray Document and the Historians The Sioui Ruling Put to the Test Denys Delâge's Opinion Peter MacLeod's Opinion Donald Graves's Analysis Another Expert: W.J. Eccles Marcel Trudel's Opinion Another Trial: The Legal Saga Continues The Historian Raynald Parent An Examination of the Murray Document Print Characters in 1760 Various Versions of the Murray Document Surface Provenance of the Printed Version (D-7a) Murray's Intentions From the Meeting of September 5 to the Conference of September 15–16 Epilogue Oswegatchie, Longueuil, and Caughnawaga Conclusion Appendices: Indian Alliances in William Johnson's Hands Sources References Illustration Sources Original Document Discovered, 1996 Index A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y