The Dale Sko Hack : a project exploring modes of production and re-form tactics . 9789197643108, 9197643106

Citation preview

the

/

A PROJECT EXPLORING MODES OF PRODUCTION AND RE-FORM TACTICS

hack

/

the

/

hack

Organized, edited and formed by Otto von Busch >self_passage< 2006 | www.selfpassage.org irst edition printed in Turkey in 500 copies ISBN-10: 91-976431-0-6 // ISBN-13: 978-91-976431-0-8 1. Fashion 2. Design 3. Hacking I. Title copyleft by the authors

/

©

to the participants; generously ingenious and to Dale; a creative epicenter

/

/

/

/

/

/ 0

/ 

/ 

the

/ 

hack

A project on shoe hacking by Arne Nerjordet, Carlos Zachrison, Siv Støldal,

/ 

Siri Johansen, Ulla Chauton, T-Michael.

/ 

Hands-on shoe hacking techniques by Stein Peterson and Dale Sko.

/ 

/ 

/ 

Good photos by Bent Rene Synnevåg. Bad and Ugly photos by Otto.

/ 

/ 0

Shoe Hacking is a method exploring the forces at play between the global fashion system and small-scale local production using collaborative design practices. This method is an open approach to fashion design rethinking roles and linear assembly in industrial production. As a modus operandi it was prototyped and tested during a three day workshop in April 2006 in a small shoe factory, Dale Sko, and the Nordic Artist Centre in Dale, Norway. / 

This booklet is a short summary of thoughts and ideas forming this event as well as the following discussions. It is made for challenging others to experiment and facilitate similar events in fashion or other design ields. Its informal format is made to act more as inspiration than instruction. Inviting a number of prominent Norwegian fashion actors to a small shoe factory north of Bergen the project was experimenting on how new interfaces and publics can be negotiated and developed. The aim was to create other approaches to post-industrial production trying to probe nonlinear means of action and co-design, open for spontaneity and crafty interventions during the production process. Nonlinear in this sense means to escape the linear and predictable worklows in production but also to blend physical production of shoes with the mythical production of fashion into synergetic amalgam. Merging the borders of these roles the participants were creating unique designs using the full skill of all actors involved and not creating designs on the terms of top down Fordist production lines. Using the metaphor of hacking the workshop was aspiring to widen the understanding on how to change the way systems work, not submitting to the ixed machine coniguration of production but instead bending and modulating it into a better itting form. That is to creatively tinker and manipulate the lows and collection of functions between the design and materialization processes and open them for collaborative interventions, but also to reclaim authorship and breaking the pre-programmed intentions of a system. In the analogue practice of shoe hacking this technique conducted experiments with the software of production instead of altered the machine hardware in the factory, instead challenged technical innovation through operational misuse. The design process investigated a collection of publics and hands-on dialogues which constituted the design space. It / 

transformed design into nonlinear intersections between creative and conductive intentions. Aspiring to materialize the energy discharged between the wills, forming an alloy of these expressions into new products, the process in the end incarnated the full spirit and shimmering desire of true fashion items. Dale Sko might create high quality hand made shoes, but they have no connections to the fashion system, and Dale is a place far away from the capitals of fashion. Thus the hacking also became an experiment in energizing the local shoe production with the high current of fashion, synthsize material and mythical production. A fashion photographer, creating the iconography of the shoe hack, documented the nonlinear alliances but of which only a fragment is represented in this booklet, mainly as colour pictures. The irst results of the Dale Sko hack will appear on the catwalks of London Fashion Week in autumn of 2006, but as a modus operandi shoe hacking is still at dawn. The texts in this booklet act to frame the workshop both from a practical and theoretical side. The irst half is a project description and report introducing the intentions of the workshop as well as documenting the practical low of work. Second half of the texts are the expanded notes of a lecture on “Modes of Production” held by Otto von Busch and Karl Palmås at Istanbul Technical University shortly after the workshop, positioning the workshop into a wider context. Hopefully these texts can form a foundation on how to work further on shoe hacking as a practice for rethinking the ties between the global scene of fashion and local quality production. The project was organised by Otto von Busch while he was an artist in residence at Nordisk Kunstnarsenter in Dale. Together with PhD. Karl Palmås, researcher at London School of Economics and Göteborg University, he is co-producing a series of seminars with the title “Modes of Production - Exploring design economies”. / 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

the

hack

EXPLORING MODES OF PRODUCTION AND RE-FORM TACTICS Project desciption and report by Otto von Busch

/ 

Within the logics of industrial capitalism it seems natural to move all production to low cost countries, outsourcing fabrication, service, even research and development. A parallel movement is the rising of urban areas as nodes and epicentres of innovation as well as connection points of a networked economy. Reading these tendencies it also falls natural to let the rural countryside only evolve as a recreation area and subsidy fed agricultural back yard of production. But what can be the response to / 

these tendencies from the low-level, off-market and non-metropolis economies? How can we ind a method to use the skill of the often highly educated workers and could we thus introduce a wider lexibility in the production process on a micro-scale, and here ind speciic advantages in post-industrial production? Locating the production cycle at this micro-level and forging it together with an expanded and nonlinear new designer role could outline the foundation for a social change in production. It could be the basis for forming speciic strategies and hands-on practices that would offer a complementary mode of production for fashion. This would suit the needs for today’s fashion designers as well as their global markets and at the same time still use the craft skills of our local production. SHOE-HACK SETTINGS - PROPOSITION The Dale Sko hack workshop and design project is trying to probe the possibilities of local production and appropriational myth-building in an ever increasing global fashion market. Hacking in this sense is the approach of reclaiming the modes of production, taking back initiative and control of an alienated production process and re-forming the process as well as an already existing product. It is a tactic for cultural counterintelligence transforming pre-existing elements to evoke meanings not originally intended in the raw material of the hack.1 As such it is animated and anti-authoritarian, seizing back imagination subjugated by technocrats. Decentralizing control and empowering will at a low level. Or in software guru Richard Stallman’s words “exploring the limits of what is possible, in a spirit of playful cleverness.”2 For a factory this would mean breaking up, reverse engineering, and tuning of the fordist-style mass production machine where the workers are just parts. Mass production requires conformity, both among the workers to run the machines in production and the consumers that purchase the product.3 Instead of working at mass level hacking can work closer to its  Becker K. (00) Tactical Reality Dictionary. Vienna: Edition Selene  Stallman, R. (00) “On Hacking” at: http://stallman.org/articles/on-hacking.html  Heath J. & Potter A. (00) Rebel Sell. Chichester : Capstone / 0

users and audience, complementing diversity to narrowcast message and method. For shoe hacking this could mean reconsidering disbanded models and re-making them. Also to misuse and adjust machines into the new needs. Artistically tuning them like in circuit bending - the creative art of audio shortcircuiting.4 In shoe production this would mean a design practice of altering models without changing the infrastructure, hardware and machinery of the factory. It would be a re-reading of industrial production, transgressing the modern dichotomy between designer and producer to instead allow co-design and co-location as essential parts of an intermediate grey zone in the production process. As such hacking could be a principal tool for practical exploration of how production at micro level can survive in the welfare state. But how would actually an approach of shoe-hacking look like? Can an appropriational practice be established merging an expanded role of design with a lexible and dynamic production process where a metaphor of “hacking” would come to full bloom? To partly answer this we need to investigate the services a local production unit might offer that the global market cannot supply, such as close support as well as local myth production. A shoe hacking practice will need to ind the advantages of the local to cultivate its strengths and carefully connect it into the energy lows of a global network, in this case the fashion system. An important step would also be to experiment in how a “limited-edition” economy is established and marketed and to map its connection points to the surrounding culture of mass production. MICRO-LEVEL RECIRCUITING The basis for the workshop is the production facility and collections of Dale Sko in Dale i Sunnfjord about 150 kilometers north of Bergen. A century old factory with a signiicant history of production but today reduced to a small unit working on a line of handmade (but machine supported) shoes with only a  Ghazala, R. (00) Circuit Bending Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing / 

dozen employees. Because of low budget the factory cannot keep up to the shifts of fashion but survives today mainly on folk dress shoes and steady orders from governmental units like the military or the police. But what will happen if a hand full of established fashion designers come to this facility and try to explore how its modes of production can be hacked? How can these designers gain some speciic advantages by acting directly by the physical production and machines, hacking the models but also provide greater dynamics to expose what this local factory can produce which might not come out from a similar or larger facility in Asia. By bringing their own distribution networks the hacked designs will automatically reach a wider fashion audience and the possibility of being exposed to the global market. Very much like using a back door to a networked system, bypassing gatekeepers and introducing the ideas from an unexpected position.5 Connecting to these lows will bring in fresh energy from outside into the local working environment. In Sweden there have been many long-term experiments on re-vitalization of old traditional industries with collaborations with designers for limited edition production. Usually joint projects with industry, regional government, development funds and designers together with universities. But most of these projects apply a traditional cycle of product development; introducing new models or sketches to mass-produce. Instead the hacking works with enabling processes, widening the connectors and improving the lows through design publics in the co-designed production process that also empowers work at the loor. Not unlike the tinkering post-producer described by Nicolas Bourriaud as suring on lows in a network of signs, inserting new forms on existing lines.6 In this case the high currency power cables of fashion that can be circuited to reach Dale Sko with the help of some designers engaged in hacking.  Stalder F. (00) Open cultures and the nature of networks. Novi Sad: Futura  Bourriaud, N. (00) Postproduction. Culture as screenplay: How art reprograms the world. New York, NY.: Lukas & Sternberg. / 

DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM The shoe-hack project is also a collaborative research platform where different actors in design and manufacturing meet to discuss and share views on new modes of production in fashion. This process of research will be furthered by bringing in also the myth producers of fashion to the shoe-hack, such as an established fashion photographer as well as a stylist. There will also be produced a theoretical relection of the process, ending up in a publication on the experiences and a discussion on how the modes of production at this level can be re-organized and re-designed taking support in the course of the workshop. The aim is to gather and overview different forces of impetus and interest that has surfaced during the project but also with the help of the designers offer fresh approaches to local production. It is important that the endeavour does not stay within the lab-settings of the workshop but also gets global distribution; through the designer’s own networks to start with. This is also the settings of a factory in post-industrial times; not deined as much by its site but instead by how it is networked.7 The workshop should be a launch pad for setting off the method on its own momentum, irst with some collections prototyped in this session but hopefully into larger future ventures. COLLABORATIVE DESIGN A question for practical discussion concerns the interface situation between designer and producer. How will a process of worker co-design look like, and how can this situation offer services that can compete with production in Asia? As customization gets more involved in production how will a post-fordist process of collaborative design look like at this low level? And how will we take best advantage of our highly trained and experienced work force in a post-industrial production situation? By creating a transparency in the full production cycle but also an insight in the mechanical means of production  Cox G. & Krysa J. (00) “Introduction to ‘The Author as (digital) Producer’”. Engineering Culture. New York, NY: Autonomedia. / 

the Dale shoe factory can become a design lab for grounded hands-on hacking as well as a theoretical base for discussion on the evolvement of new roles in design and industrial production. An advantage of this process is that it takes immediate material shape. In the end of the day there will not only be shared experiences but new prototypes of shoes and also fresh images, much needed for understanding how fashion can be operated. By inviting acclaimed designers to hack processes together with experienced workers the Dale shoe hack offers a unique possibility to probe into new modes of production where the producer is not a passive part in a line of silent functions but instead having a more active role. This role, interconnected to the designer, can be correlated to the transformation from actant to actor.8 In actor-network theory the actant is an unspeciied function while actor is endowed with a character and speciic competence.9 This difference can be stressed for revealing a more engaged role for classic assembly work positioning itself in a symbiotic relation to the production. Instead of being a passive function in a line every step can be a source of action, not a dumb role but embodying a will beyond the surface content, in this case linear production. In this sense hacking seems very similar to the utopian experiments of William Morris and the Arts and Craft movement in the end of the 19th century. Trying to meet the falling quality of mass produced goods as well as the alienating work for the people in the factories Morris suggested a more thorough design process and a return to work organization in guilds. He even promoted a speciic style of clothing called “the aesthetic dress” in a very medieval looking style. But even in the Arts and Craft the designer was still the Artist, the sole author of the work, and as such the hacking at Dale Sko is not about replacing the operating system of the factory with pure craft. Instead it is about breaking into the processes of the line of assembly to expand a larger space for co-design and co-author Hawkes T. () Structuralism and Semiotics Berkeley: University of California Press.  Latour B. () “The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts” in Bijker, Wiebe; Law, John (eds.) Shaping Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press / 

/ 

ship. Not only in the general process or control of the facility itself, but into the design of every unique product. This can only be done in small quantities, but that is the scale of manufacture for Dale Sko. The hacking is neither only a question of customization since the action space for these processes usually is limited beforehand and controlled to follow certain intentions. Instead the hacking is open negotiation, which might end in any form. To use another computer metaphor the hack is to turn the work from RO, Read Only, to R/W, Read/Write. This means not to only read the ready instructions from the designer but to also be the co-author to every copy.

DALE SKO HACK – PROCESS The Dale Sko Hack was a three-day design workshop at the local shoe factory in Dale, Norway, exploring new approaches on the modes of production involved in creating fashion in open collaboration with off-centre production. Six established Norwegian fashion designers were invited to the factory together with an experienced model-maker and a recognized fashion photographer assisted by a stylist documented the project. Point of departure for the project was using the existing “hardware” of the factory, lasts, machines and production equipment but instead hacking the “software” of the production line - choice of designs, materials, processes and methods. Instead of keeping a linear and traditional industrial way of production - how can we produce other lows, channels and interfaces between global fashion and small, peripheral, local production facilities? The workshop started with a presentation of the factory and a machine park walk-through followed by an inventory of the existing materials used in the production. As the factory’s inherent production processes unfolded the designers also collected material samples, assemblages and details from the existing shoe models. During the observations the processes were / 

discussed in detail both with the workers and the model-maker together with the designers for understanding the convergence of skills used in the various steps of production. After the factory walk-through the workshop continued in a studio of the Nordisk Kunstnarsenter (Nordic Artist Centre) with a detailed session of model making, from sketching, taping and drawing on the last to hands-on cutting of stencils and patterns for production. Bringing in various materials the workshop also discussed choice of leather, soles and stitching styles as the session continued until late in the evening. The following day started with cutting of material for the modiied shoes as well as re-mixing the existing models with new materials and processes. The inventory of tools as well as exploration of techniques continued during the day as the designers proceeded with their new designs in cooperation with the factory workers. It became apparent that as both parts were developing ways for co-design and meeting the traditional models subtly transformed with new inspiration. As the workers left for the day the designers kept present as excess current in the industrial machine, waiting to discharge into new forms of matter orchestrated by the model-maker. Thus some prototypes inished already after one day of intense work. Later in the evening an open discussion was held at the artist centre bridging designers and interested participants from the local community. Issues of concern was how fashion can be produced in off-centre locations without disappearing into anonymous silence but also how speciic processes of co-design and value production could be ampliied through the vectors of the fashion system. It is not enough for a facility to be good at material production and distribution but it also has to have channels into the fashion system for the production of myth. But how can the excess fashion value be led back into the local community and the production facility itself? What could be the credit system for production that could trigger further developments and that might even make a place like Dale appear on the global fashion map. / 

During the third and inal day the production at the factory continued with great intensity as the last prototypes materialized in the hands of designers and workers. Most designers worked on two parallel models with varying complexity and correlation with the original models from the factory. Small changes in the patterns were introduced as well as random elements, materials and processes using various punches and stamps to widen the operation and variety of the models and bringing unique values to the originally linear production at Dale Sko. Not only the outer design was changed but also inner soles and lining. Some pairs got a special inish inside the shoes for a luxurious feeling, a lift for a surface that previously was traditionally mute. During the day the new prototypes were documented by the fashion photographer and stylist for creating the important image of fashion, a step usually neglected by producers who take a lot of pride in their superior craftsmanship but forget that most of their consumers will encounter the products as images before they actually step into the shoes. Outside the physical matter of the fashion object is a thin shimmer of mythical image, a readiness created by our visual culture, but speciically in fashion, by the image creators and photographers. We have usually been told this shimmer or myth is “false”, a fetish value, and could thus be neglected in favour for some “true” quality, but this shimmer is the exquisite product of fashion. To include a distinctive photographer into the project was as important as the designers, since theses actors are cooperating as the myth producers of fashion. All designers got photographed in their shoes draped in sheets to only expose the feet. Various scenographies in the factory and surrounding Dale were used as backdrops. At the end of the day there was held a common discussion and feedback session gathering the administrators of the factory and the artist centre together with the designers to evaluate the project and take out the course for further development. The meeting summed up as very positive where / 

/ 

/ 0

the workshop indeed had accomplished more than the limited initial hope from the participants and factory to bloom into a prosperous experience of collaborative work. It had evolved new understandings of shoe production and co-creation for the designers and Dale Sko to ind common ground for hacking and “software” tools for co-design. At this point it seems like hacked shoes from Dale Sko will be part of new collections from Norwegian designers working worldwide, showing at the fashion weeks in London as well as in Paris – something beyond the previous scope and scale of the shoe factory in Dale that now appeared in national media as a progressive force with global connections and in shimmering hype.

/ 

POST SCRIPTUM It is apparent that a new role for the designer evolved during the project, not breaking radical new terrain in terms of shoe style innovation but working with impulses, modest proposals, small beginnings with emergent potential. Much like the “small change” proposed by development practitioner Nabeel Hamdi.10 The linear, industrial structure of production at the factory was broken up into more intense cells of creation and taking instead taking a meandering path. It was a more ambiguous collaboration to create a wider interface between designers and factory. Instead of creating “divine” sketches in the beginning of the process the designers worked very close to the production process and methods changed form ad hoc during the process. Not only in the total control of the “genius” designer but in collaboration and coexistence with the old models from Dale Sko. As a dialogue the workshop materialized new designs from inside the processes of the factory, with the old models and their infrastructure as a creative platform for emulating further creative play in interchange with the precursory forms. Intersecting the shoe hack with the thoughts of Dutch philosopher Henk Oosterling the designs can be said to be taking shape in-between the actors, as an inter-esse; a ield in-between (inter) the unstable and non-discursive qualities of the being (esse).11 An essence bridging what was before seen as a divide between professions and will. As interstitial forms the designs became material centres of attention in the publics balancing the collaboration. A play between, not auto-nomous in-dividuals, but instead, clusters of co-authors in dialogue. Shoes as merged assemblages of palpable will. The works of Siv Støldal could be seen as a quintessential modus operandi of hacking as she used the already existing models only changing materials and introducing random punch decorations to the designs. Every pair thus becomes unique 0 Hamdi N. (00) Small Change. London, Earthscan.  Oosterling, H. (00) “Sens(a)ble Intermediality and Interesse: Towards an Ontology of the In-Between” Intermédialités, no , printemps 00/Spring 00, CRI Montreal, pp. -. / 

but still preserves the integrity of the traditional models from Dale Sko. Arne and Carlos strategy of “pimpifying” a traditional model also changed the expression by slightly altering the cut and adding new materials, turning the shoe into a daring style. As T-Michael redrew the form and changed the material into exclusively treated sealskin and reworking the sole he introduced a Victorian dandy style to the model but also revealed how the shape of the foot and forms of the existing lasts can communicate to produce new visual expressions. Not only was the material production changed but also the process for creating image and myth. By connecting channels directly to Dale Sko from actors within the fashion system the current of fashion myth was injected into the local facility, far away from the main vectors of myth lows (like fashion capitals, shows, markets and magazines). Underlining the potential of the local the current from the established fashion designers not only created positive media attention to the factory but also improving the myth narrative for the designers to include into their lifestyle concept. As such local Norwegian shoe production could move from a picturesque, local and ethical value into something hyped, cool and truly fashionable avant-garde. Proposing the role of the designer changed not only means that the “genius” designer as been dethroned into a collaborative change agent but instead expanded the aesthetic ield of manipulation within reach. By orchestrating open interfaces of design self-organization and stressing the potential of interstitial forms the involved designers transgressed their previous borders of action. The design interfaces became spaces of action, framing attempts to connect separated wills into new merged lows. They also injected energy at a new frequency to the local facility, thus having an even more interesting partner in dialogue. Design self-organization could be seen as a practice of creating small open cells of negotiation as a conscious tool for bringing the design process into a new ield of action. These cells are small publics or interfaces where designers and participating actors meet on equal ground in a process / 

of small change or hacking, using their own tools and understandings to dive deeper into practical dialogue and hands-on exploration. Not to change the whole process or hardware but to modulate the lows and functions. As the negotiation in this speciic small public progress (the settings are of many small publics, small changes, small hacks) it is also important to support this intermutual change by connecting it into other publics to enhance and amplify the possible impacts into other local publics. As the process showed during the workshop it is very important that these negotiation and publics are done in humble and respectful ways. To deal with a proud local actor in decline is a sensitive balancing act where the designers have to proceed with caution not to hurt any feelings during the process. Big ego designers are not usually the best negotiators and could seriously harm both the collaborative design process as well as draining the energy invested into the project. But as it showed during the workshop it is very possible to create very intense and positive changes by open negotiations and positive small change. Bringing in the eyes of media as well as putting the spotlight at the collaborative working process formulated new viewpoints in addition to renewed handcraft pride. For the shoe factory to be recognized and respected not only for its old merits but also for its concern to go further and keep on being a progressive local player with global fashion connections the media attention became a recognition for its hard work. In this case the positive feedback from the workers and apparent furthering and re-energization of the work process in the factory showed that it was indeed very possible to bring traditional industrial production into becoming a progressive force in the local community. Thus the project also became a tool for enablement and powering up hyphenated functions in the production, energizing modulation and spontaneous working processes exposing deeper layers of knowledge and putting them into better use as their value can be an exposed part of the inal fashionable result. / 

A possible next step for the project would be to support the new connections and collaborations between the designers and the factory, both the design publics and contacts that came out of the workshop but mainly as points of departure for further commercial transactions. It is not enough that the fashion designers produce their rather small collections of shoes in Dale but it is also needs to support the attention the factory might get from this collaboration. If the channels of fashion start energizing the brand of Dale Sko it is also important that the shoe factory is ready to respond to that by further developing their models, but maybe not in a too radical way. The changes they will need to do to keep up with fashion could be quite small and simple, just as the workshop proved, but these small changes needs still to be done with careful sensitivity. It would also be preferred if this would be done in a similar way of respect and sensibility that was shown by the workshop participants. The Dale Sko hack was an experiment in analogue hacking in industrial settings, probing new forms of collaborative design in fashion production. The factory, once the main employer and gem of the town, can once again claim to be innovative and continue to be a local pride into the future. A meeting place between the global fashion system and local quality production. The actors can meet here for practical dialogue in collaborative design and a cluster of publics for negotiation. These are small publics where speciic values are created – material, economic and mythical – which they all can call their own. This would mean that Dale, a small town on the Norwegian countryside with 1500 inhabitants, no longer is a place where the signals of fashion can be read in magazines distributed from far away. Instead it is a place where fashion is also written. Not only enacted but also co-produced.

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

the

hack DESIGN MANAGEMENT: A REINTERPRETATION

Lecture at Istanbul Technical University, 4 May 2006 on the theme of Modes of Production and Design Hacking by Otto von Busch and Karl Palmås

/ 0

What is ’design management’? To some, it is a ield of study that assists designers in following the recent tenets of ‘management theory’. To others, it is a scientiic discipline that instructs managers how to add new value to – to, as it were, sparkle some design lustre over – their existing business practices. However, design management can also be the study of heterodox practices emerging among design practitioners. / 

Framed in this way, design management is a ield of study that explores new economic forms emerging within design economies. As such, as these studies highlight the existence of a multitude of off-the-norm models of economic life, the ield of design management may help us imagine a market economy that hosts a plethora of different, yet co-existing, logics. In this lecture, we will follow this latter interpretation of design management. Drawing upon design processes that we have participated in, we will point to the weird and wonderful ways in which contemporary objects are designed. OPENING UP THE DESIGN PROCESS One object that is undergoing a change in design practices is – believe it or not – the automobile. In recent years, Volvo Car Corporation has become known as the home of the all-womendesigned Your Concept Car. Nevertheless, beyond this example, the company is also exploring how to stage a design process that is more socially robust, drawing upon competencies that do not necessarily reside inside the corporation. Instead, Volvo has found ways to open the company to external knowledge producers. For instance, one of the recent innovations in Volvo products is the design of car compartments and interiors that cater to users with contact allergies and asthma. Thus, the car is are stripped of allergens and asthma-inducing chemicals. Moreover, the some of the physical design features also cater to these same users – for instance, designers have studied issues such as how easy it is to keep the interiors clean. Throughout this process – the elimination of chemicals, the redesign of the interiors etc. – Volvo engineers and designers have collaborated closely with the Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association.

/ 

This case is interesting in the ways that it disrupts traditional roles of corporations and civil society organisations. Traditionally, corporations are to be seen to be sealed vessels that host certain capabilities – for instance to design, manufacture and sell cars. The expertise to do so is expected to reside inside the company, in the hands of designers, engineers and marketers. Indeed, it is the ownership of these very resources that sustains the irm, securing its competitive advantage.1 The task of the corporation is to translate its resources into products and services, thus creating ‘utility’ for consumers, in a rational manner. In order to be rational, production also needs to be non-subjective and non-political – corporations are simply to supply consumers with products, put into this world by engineers that ‘just design things’. Politics, then, only comes into the picture in the form of the state, which regulates the company through legislation, thus setting the boundaries for production.2 The civil society organisation, on the other hand, is ordinarily seen to be kept out of the productive process. Instead, its purpose is to mobilise citizens around issues of shared concern, be they cultural, political or otherwise. Thus, according to the modern view of the economy, the only way for the Astma and Allergy Association to be related to Volvo’s productive process is through the state – for instance, it may lobby the government to regulate the automotive industry on issues of allergens in car interiors. However, in the case of Volvo and the Asthma and Allergy Association, this separation of ‘objective business’ and ‘subjective  Penrose, E. () The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.  See for example “The good society is delivered by a robust tension between politically deined constraints and the self-interest and animal spirits of business and entrepreneurs, and it is not always wise to muddy those roles. […] Capitalism lourishes within a clearly understood role for the state as the deiner and implementer of wider social objectives.” Pp. -, in Turner, JA. (00) Just Capital. The Liberal Economy. London: Macmillan. / 

civil society’ has collapsed: Political activists have invaded the sphere of engineering and production; designers and engineers have taken sides in the politics of asthma and allergies. Thus, we are left with a ‘hybrid’ process that fuses innovation and politics into becoming one and the same thing.3 This implosion implies that civil society groups can develop new ways of enacting politics – instead of having to lobby for government action, they can move to assist in design processes. For corporations, these forms of collaborations require new modes of organisation. How do engineers communicate and collaborate with civil society activists? Under what terms are these collaborations to be staged? These are issues currently discussed at Volvo Car Corporation and elsewhere in the corporate world. There are, chiely, two reasons for why corporations are making efforts to construct these forms engineering processes. First, corporations have increasingly come to understand the beneits of being close to their consumers in the development of new products. Thus, ‘user innovation’ has become a key term within the ield of innovation studies.4 Taking the cue from the example from the development of the computer operating system Linux, these scholars are pointing to how users are often skilled enough to participate in the (re-)design of products – making them into so-called ‘prosumers’.5 Moreover, these scholars argue that ‘user innovation’ is not merely a novelty, relected in open source software development, but a phenomenon that has existed for a long time, for instance in the context of design of sports equipment.6  Latour, B () We Have Never Been Modern. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.  Von Hippel, E. (00) Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.  This term was originally coined by futurist Alvin Tofler. Tofler, A. (1980) The Third Wave. Random House.  Shah, S. (00) ‘Open Beyond Software’, in D. Cooper, C. DiBona & M. Stone (eds.) Open Sources 2. O’Reilly Media: Sebastopol, CA. / 

Secondly, this trend is also following an acknowledgment of the fact that knowledge production has increasingly moved out from the conines of universities and corporate research labs. Instead, knowledge is produced in distributed networks that draw together heterogeneous actors – lay individuals, NGOs, think tanks, journalists etc. Moreover, this ‘new mode of knowledge production’ implies that knowledge is developed in relation to applications, in trans-disciplinary settings, with a focus on social durability (i.e. there must be a ‘buy-in’ from a number of social stakeholders).7 In short, the university scientist or the corporate engineer can no longer enjoy the same privileged position that he – because it was usually a he8 – had throughout the 20th century. For corporations, this means that their version of the truth – for instance, the truth about the properties of their products – is increasingly facing competition from other truths. The most well-known example is that of the Shell Brent Spar debacle, when the knowledge claims provided by Shell, the British government and environmental experts was rejected, marginalised by the conlicting knowledge claims provided by Greenpeace and other civil society actors. Since then, many large corporations have found themselves in situations when the public rejected the knowledge claims of its engineers and designers, instead opting for the version of the truth provided by consumers, lay people, NGOs and journalists. Hence, the imperative to build design processes that build socially robust products – design processes that incorporate knowledges from external stakeholders – has grown increasingly important.

 Gibbons, M. et al. () The New Production of Knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.  Potter, E. (00) Gender and Boyle’s Law of Gases. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Also, see discussion in () Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.Female_ Man©_Meets_Oncomouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. London: Routledge. / 

CATHEDRALS AND BAZAARS, MARKETS AND ANTIMARKETS As already mentioned, the new ideas on innovation and distributed knowledge production are heavily inspired by developments in open source software production, notably the design process that gave rise to Linux. One early discussion on this process was provided by Eric Raymond’s web essay The Cathedral and the Bazaar, published as a book in 1999.9 Raymond argues that the design of Microsoft’s Windows operating system is akin to a cathedral – a top-down-structured bureaucracy, held together by a command system, drawing upon heavy investments funnelled trough the inancial mechanisms of modern capitalism. In contrast, Linux emerged in a bazaar-like mode of organisation, based upon a self-organising, decentralised network of computer hackers, whose afiliation to the project was on voluntary and ad-hoc basis. Thus, the Linux project could achieve great success without the inancial muscle of a corporate structure. One of the main points of this comparison is to show that the traditional way of structuring formal organisations (be they corporations or not) does not necessarily yield the best results. Instead, the anarchic bazaar mode of (self-) organisation may prove more effective, even if the product under construction is highly complex (such as an operating system). This realisation has spawned a number of parallel discussions, not least regarding whether Raymond’s socioeconomic insights can be generalised beyond the organisation of software design. Another such discussion has concerned the interrelations between ‘cathedrals’ and ‘bazaars’, notably whether they have a symbiotic relation to each other. For instance, to what extent does the existence of cheap open source software propagate the use of the Internet, helping Microsoft sell more Windows  Raymond, E.S. () The Cathedral & the Bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA.: O’Reilly & Associates. / 

licences? Moreover, to what extent does the success of Linux depend upon Microsoft’s heavy investment in getting consumers to use computers in the irst place? A similar discussion on the symbiotic relationship between cathedrals and bazaars is to be found in Manuel DeLanda’s work on the economy, as inspired by economic historian Fernand Braudel.10 For DeLanda, the economy is to be seen as a composite of both market forms of organisation and antimarket forms of organisation. Here, ‘markets’ are to be seen as the equivalent of Raymond’s decentralised, self-organising bazaar, whereas antimarkets are akin to the bureaucratic command structures of Raymond’s cathedral. This causes conceptual confusion, because “if capitalism has always relied on noncompetitive practices, if the prices for its commodities have never been objectively set by demand/supply dynamics, but imposed from above by powerful economic decision-makers, then capitalism and the market have always been different entities.”11 Beyond the point that market economies consist of both markets and anti-markets – a fact often ignored by orthodox economists – DeLanda also argues that the two modes of organisation constantly generate each other. Decentralised markets can over time mutate into bureaucratic hierarchies of power, and such hierarchies may sooner or later dissolve into markets. Thus, “once a market grows beyond a certain size, it spontaneously generates a hierarchy of exchange, with prestige goods at the top and elementary goods, like food, at the bottom. Command structures, in turn, generate meshworks, as when hierarchical organizations created the automobile and then a meshwork of services (repair shops, gas stations, motels and so on), grew around it.” 0 DeLanda, M. () A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History. New York, NY.: Zone Books.  DeLanda, M. ’Markets and anti-markets in the world economy’, online paper available at http://www.alamut.com/subj/economics/de_landa/antiMarkets.html. / 

While DeLanda is critical towards the oppressive properties of antimarkets, he also acknowledges the fact that completely ‘destratiied’ economies – consisting only of local, decentralised, self-organising markets – are largely untenable. Nevertheless, in this lecture, we focus design economies that are constituted as markets, rather than antimarkets. LOCAL EXCHANGES OF KNOWLEDGE AND COMMODITIES IN URBAN SETTINGS To attach these thoughts more irmly to design management we have focused on examples within fashion where cathedrals and bazaars as well as markets and antimarkets easily can be identiied. Fashion is also an intriguing ield of application since, as fashion theorist Elisabeth Wilson claims, “fashion speaks capitalism”12. If we look at the classical top-down hierarchy of fashion, in traditions like Paris as fashion capital, Chanel as high-level fashion and Karl Lagerfeld as genius incarnation of fashion artist all these structures appear to be organized as cathedrals. These are closed internal structures with high gravity of artistic inluence and aesthetic power organized not so different from how we can imagine the power structures of the church, with the pope in the top, connected to a higher power which in fashion could be the beauty ideal.13 Opposite of this, but just as strong in inluence, we could identify the Tokyo street fashion scene with hundreds of small players and designers and very ephemeral in their inluences and networked in their structure. One brand appears one day, transforms until the next and disappears or is merged not much later. Behaviour related to the networked scene is very  Wilson, E () Adorned in Dreams London: Virago  This metaphor should not be seen as a blaspheming but instead put a focus on how channels and institutions of belief work. Fashion is a phenomenon with many parallels in expression and manifestation to the practices and institutions of religion. Fashion is a belief system and its religious artifacts are the fashion garments. / 

revealing, especially in the case of the “fruit kids”, performing spectacular costumes and constant re-invention of their dressed identity, often in bright combinations and smashing appearances in total re-mix fashion. This could be seen as a total opposite of how the approach to cathedral fashion is; often as investments in the institution of the brand, not very experimental or consciously eclectic but more a safe play within the structures provided by the fashion magazines as the key answers to style equations. Following the styles provided by the printed visual fashion channels we are closely following the creation process of fashion since, as Roland Barthes claims in his book The Fashion System; “the magazine is a machine that makes fashion”14. (we will come back to the machine metaphor later.) But fashion as bazaar can not only be seen in the street struggles of Tokyo but also in the do-it-yourself punk heritage approach to fashion that has been seen lourish the last years also within the established top brands. Many different projects have run on how to transform clothes or update old crafts into more contemporary expressions.15 Most of these actor, often combing activism and craft, are re-inventing the fashion scene in a truly punk way, but often lack the inluence and acceptance of the fashion system which often makes these expressions very marginal phenomena, not often reaching the established channels of the belief system; the top magazines.16 Instead these small networks of craftists can be regarded as part of the rising class of so-called “Pro-Ams”, or professional  Barthes, R. () The Fashion System London: Verso  p..  Some examples can be found at www.craftivism.com, www.microrevolt.org, www. churchofcraft.com, www.subversivecrossstitch.com or www.swaporamarama.org 16 We are here using the deinition of Kawamura, differing clothes (as material) from fashion (as system of signs) - “clothing and dress are the raw material from which fashion is formed. Fashion as a belief is manifested through clothing.” p.. Kawamura, Y. (00) Fashion-ology Oxford: Berg / 

amateurs. This term is coined by the British think tank Demos, which stipulates that the economy of the 21st century will incorporate a blurring of the delineations between work and leisure, professionalism and amateurism, enterprise and activism.17 This constitutes a radical break with the 20th century ideals of modern professional: Within this framework, production was to be provided by apolitical experts who worked “nine to ive” in large institutions, and then spent their idle time at home, engaging in non-productive leisure activities. Today, we see that many amateurs are becoming as skilled as the professionals in the traditional institutions, and that many contemporary products are produced by networked enthusiasts during their leisure time. Thus, the craftists mentioned above are furthering their interests into a higher level of serious hobbyism and prosumer knowledge production. They are not players in the high ground of the system but instead work networked on lower plateaus, intermixing expressions and styles, producing independent collections in limited editions, but also using punk-style fashion magazines as their channels or reaching out on alternative fashion events or alternative shows (as parallel parasites to fashion weeks or other open events such as the independent shows at Designmai or Bread and Butter in Berlin). What characterizes this approach to design is the low level organizational works focusing on the creation of small cells of communication and collaboration. As these cells form and remain open in their shape they make patterns similar to selforganized networks in synergetic alloys often in non-linear format and in dynamic consonance. Examples of this could be everything from the creation of independent zines to small scale fashion events like the Tee Shirt Construction Nights of Matrushka18 in Los Angeles or the release events of the Berlin  Leadbeater, C. & Miller P. (00) The Pro-Am Revolution at: http://www.demos.co.uk/ iles/proamrevolutioninal.pdf  www.matrushka.com / 0

label Florinda Schnitzel where local artist and DJ form together with designers to create other than visual status values in their designs. These kind of events are common in “creative industries” but still struggle to get due recognition as productive elements in society of which new values can reach the public. The critical world still has a tendency of regarding material culture as only material and as such a closed form hard to manipulate. HACKING AS A PRODUCTIVE AND POLITICAL PRACTICE If we understand society as a structure and system consisting of small entities engaged in interaction at small levels but supporting the foundation of civil society act of micro politics can also be described as hacking the system since even the smallest change might inluence the system at large. The hacker is in this sense a co-producer and co-author of a system. One interesting example of this kind of hacking is the slash iction, a culture conducted by popular culture fans that took off in the 70s with the stories of Kirk/Spock where the two main characters from the TV series Star Trek engaged in a homoerotic relation totally created by the fans.19 These stories that most popular engage male characters are estimated to be to 90% written by women sometimes create controversies both by upset fans that doesn’t comply with the erotic hijacking of their stars but mainly form copyright owners and legal institutions.20 Many slash authors mean that they reveal the true intentions of the original creators that were suppressed by publishing companies and distribution lobby or simply hidden by the creator to be released by their most devoted fans.  Penley, C. () “Feminism, Psychoanalysis, and the Study of Popular Culture” in Visual Culture (ed. Bryson N. et al) New England: Wesleyan 0 There is also a culture of femmeslash focusing on homosexual and bisexual stories of female characters, but not at all as popular or productive as the male slash. There are also controversies about stories of underage characters which by most fans who usually does not oppose the erotic content but in this case is regarded to be taking the stories too far. / 

What is most fascinating with slash culture from a hacking point of view is the format and tactics it is using to ind loopholes in the stories and insert their own authorship into these gaps of the stories. Instead of accepting the cuts and closure of the producer and original creator they use these to enrich the stories and multiply layers of complexity to the narratives by re-reading the plots and lines of the stories, retying them into new knots and mechworks along the lines the story lows thus taking back initiative from the media itself, changing the low from author to audience in a very hands-on way. But hacking is also practices engaged in very technical ields to like in circuit bending, the creative art of short circuiting electronic instruments and toys into unimagined noise producing tools for exploring disharmonies and enrich music production. By opening electronic toys and by simple means, without any previous electronic skills, explore how the sounds change by just touch different parts of the interior circuit board and re-circuiting various parts of the connectors. A similar approach can be found in tactical media practices of taking back media or in how the Italian telestreet movement is using low power pirate TV to hack the power structures and media control on a low level, neighbourhood scale as independent community media on a proxy-scale – talking back on community level. Their programs span a large range of topics, everything from activist media, union statements and discussions, and human rights forums as well as re-broadcasting football send by restricted satellite-channels for which the viewer originally has to pay. The channel Disco Volante is for example formed of physically handicapped focusing on agendas such as accessibility and participation in their community proxy broadcasts. An organized analogue fashion hacking event was organized in Dale north of Bergen in April 2006 inviting established Nor/ 

wegian fashion designers to hack the software and assembly methods of the small local factory. The size and budget of the factory made it impossible to introduce new models or to follow the constant changes of fashion so the task of the designers was to ind new ways to use the existing hardware but also to reform the interface between designer and production facility. Instead of acting as an “aesthetic god” sending sketches to be mass produced the designers were instead consciously working with the existing knowledge and models and instead trying to ind other paths for channelling the knowledge and energy at the factory. Re-coniguring the connectors and modulating the inner processes at the factory, but not on an organizational level but more in the hands-on assembly line as well as the cells and publics on the loor. The designers were changing the models by introducing new materials to the old models as well as introducing simple randomized decoration patterns to make every pair unique as well as pushing the borders on how the assemblage of styles could work. The design process was then a combination of skills – reintroducing attention and hope into a stagnated process, creating a set of respectful publics and interfaces for developing the designs and methods together with the producers but just as important creating the “touch” of fashion myth to it. It is not enough for a fashion production facility to be of excellent material quality but also the mythical level has to be taken seriously as it is a just as essential part of the inished product. For this part the designers brought their own channels out into the fashion system, something the small off-center factory had big problems doing by itself. What is apparent with the Dale example is how the process of software hacking can energize a system, especially in the sense of fashion. Not only became the old shoe factory head line news in the local media that for once had some positive news from the old industries that usually appear on the pages / 

when they ire another set of workers but the process also showed that the skills of old crafts were still paying of and could be applied in new ways to co-create new values reaching outside of the channels provided by the factory. The roles of the designer was multiplied as well as networked but also non-linear as it broke the usual top-elitism of the designer as genius and artistic author of myth and instead became a facilitator of multiple publics and design relations – connecting low level processes of unique software production changes but also introducing social values to the design process as well as producing energized myth connected to the fashion system. In traditional terms this role seems complicated; author, organizer, facilitator, economist as well as designer but it might also sum up under another term related to the change of metaphor – the hacker. For instance, Manuel DeLanda has stated that activists need to adopt a “hacker attitude towards all forms of knowledge: not only to learn UNIX or Windows NT to hack this or that computer system, but to learn economics, sociology, physics, biology to hack reality itself. It is precisely the ‘can do’ mentality of the hacker, naive as it may sometimes be, that we need to nurture everywhere.”21 DeLanda thus argues that hacking as a productive and political practice can be generalized. But in order to approach this idea, we can use Eric Raymond’s writings to learn more about what he terms “the hacker attitude”. According to Raymond, this attitude implies that one believes that the world is full of interesting problems waiting to be solved. Hence, the hacker attitude is less concerned with airy-fairy theories of some impending utopia, but more interested in the hard-nosed practices of constant hacking, in order to produce tangible differences in the world.  From an interview by DJ Spooky: http://www.djspooky.com/articles/essayonmanuel. html / 

This implies that “attitude is no substitute for knowledge” – in order to hack a system, one has to have deep knowledge of how it works. This problem is however assuaged by the collectivist ethos of the hacker community: The hacker attitude is also based upon the conviction that sharing knowledge and ideas is a virtue that makes hacking a more productive enterprise. Through sharing knowledge, the hacker community becomes more skilful, or – in computer speak – “given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow”.

THE PROLIFERATION OF COMPUTER METAPHORS So far, this lecture has encompassed a number of ideas imported from the world of computer networks. This is however not unique to “our” thinking – computer metaphors proliferating across a number of social spheres. They are to be found in arts, activism, business theory, natural science, international development discourse etc. For instance, art critic Nicolas Bourriaud has written about the hacking as a key strategy for contemporary artists22, and ideas of “open source” are getting increasingly prominent in publications such as AdBusters23. Similarly, “open innovation” is all the rage in Harvard Business Review24, and natural scientists are now writing about cosmos as a computer25. While these ideas can be dismissed as simple metaphors that may or may not capture the underlying reality of contemporary society – many social scientists are still skeptical towards the notion of a new, computerized knowledge economy – we can also accept these metaphors as essential elements in the as Bourriaud, N. (00) Postproduction. Culture as screenplay: How art reprograms the world. New York, NY.: Lukas & Sternberg.  See AdBusters Magazine, issue , “The big ideas of 00”.  See for instance “Connect and Develop: Inside Procter & Gamble’s New Model for Innovation” in the March issue of Harvard Business Review.  Lloyd, S. (00) Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes On the Cosmos. New York, NY.: Knopf. / 

sembly of society. Metaphors are not “just” metaphors; they inluence our ways of seeing – and constructing – our worlds. The philosopher of science Michel Serres has even argued that metaphors derived from the world of technological artifacts have always governed our ways of seeing the world. For instance, early scientiic theories about the world – notably astronomy – were heavily inluenced by the clockwork technology. From the understanding of the clockwork, the dominant technology of the time, scientists construed the world as a vast construction of rotating wheels, set in motion by some transcendent being. Nevertheless, after the advent of the steam engine, the motor became the dominant technology in society. This inspired modern scientists and artists to conceptualize the world in new terms. Hence, the simple clockwork metaphors were replaced with motor metaphors. God was removed from the equation, and motion – i.e. the march of history – came from “reservoirs” of fuel that propelled society forward. Hence, in Marx, class interests propelled the dialectical march of time, and in Freud, repressed sexuality propelled humans to act in peculiar ways. Serres has also traced the motor metaphor to artists such as Turner and Zola. Interestingly, the spread of the motor metaphor – from technical contraption (the steam engine) to theoretical models of the world (whether Marxist or Freudian) – was contingent upon the formulation of the general logic of steam engine. Thus, the technical contraption had to be formulated as an “abstract machine”, in order to spread to the minds of modern scientists and artists. This process took half a century, with Carnot’s abstract description of the steam engine being instrumental in transforming the physical contraption into ideas.

/ 

One example of how the engine/motor metaphor is established in society can be seen in the education system described by Vilem Flusser where he identiies the common school system as a feeding of the machine: the irst years in school the subjects are forced into a system to be disciplined to come in time and learn to read the basics, such as the manual of the machine. The second step (such as high school) is for those intelligent enough to service the machine and the inal and highest step is the university (or technical high school) where the construction of machines is taught. 26 The various tests and exams during the process are measurements to give every component in the system a number for easy management of the system and replacement of broken parts (like retired workers or engineers). Given the rise of computer and network technologies (which have been used for half a century), it seems reasonable to expect that we are now entering an era when these metaphors will provide us with new views of the world. For instance, Manual DeLanda has explored the nature of warfare “in the age of intelligent machines”.27 However, the formulation of computer networks as abstract machines seems likely to inluence a number of ields. However, in this lecture, we will limit ourselves to design practices. THE ROLE OF THE DESIGNER In a world increasingly governed by metaphors from the world of computerized networks, what is the role of the designer? As we know from the “critical” sentiments expressed by scholars towards the latter third of the 20th century, designers cannot detach themselves from the political aspects of their work. Science and Technology Studies (STS) has shown that scientists and engineers are not “just doing science” or “just doing engineering” – they are intensely political actors, shaping our  Flusser, V. () The Shape of Things London: Reaktion  DeLanda, M. () War in the Age of Intelligent Machines. New York, NY.: Zone Books. / 

worlds. Similarly, there is no such thing as “just doing design”. Here, we are greatly indebted to the baby boom generation. In the late 1960s, they – as radical youths – spearheaded a thorough critique of the technocratic society. As Theodore Roszak wrote in 1968, a technocracy is “that society in which those who govern justify themselves by appeal to technical experts who, in turn, justify themselves by appeal to scientiic forms of knowledge”.28 As such, the technocracy is the social form in which industrial society reaches the peak of its organizational integration. The main theoretical basis for this view of society was provided by Herbert Marcuse’s blend of Marx and Freud, depicting industrial society as a machine of exploitation and repression. Crucially, Marcuse’s ideas highlighted the ways in which culture – mass media, advertising and contemporary modes of thought – usurped any potential for critique of capitalism. Mass culture thus served to turn industrial capitalism into a motor-like, closed system. For the countercultural youth, the only way out of this total system was to throw gravel into the machinery, jamming its modes of operation, thus baring the monstrosity of the machine for all of the world to see. Public demonstrations, sit-ins, subversive art and various ways of “dropping out” mainstream culture were all different approaches to achieve this effect. Thus, critique became synonymous with deconstruction, debunking, defacing and detournement. However, in a world no longer construed as a motor (following a ixed set of motions), and instead construed as a computer network (loosely assembled and constantly subject to recon Roszak, T. () The Making of a Counter Culture: Relections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. London: Faber. / 

iguration), new forms of critique are emerging. The radical opposition to the machine was to sabotage it, by throwing a clog, sabot, into the machine and break it for reconstructing a new one. In a similar manner the way to change society was by a revolution, crashing the existing one and building a new better society from scratch. But today, rather than to deconstruct their object of critique, artists and activists are striving to reconstruct it – just like the hacker is reconstructing computer systems. Nicolas Bourriaud writes about this phenomenon in the context of contemporary art: “While the detournement of preexisting artworks is a currently employed tool, artists use it not to ‘devalorize’ the work of art but to utilize it”29. Thus, the aim is not to jam or drop out of the system – as was the case for the countercultural youth – but to make it operate in new and unexpected ways. On a similar note, Manuel DeLanda ends his A Thousand Years of Non-linear History with a quote from Deleuze and Guattari: “Staying stratiied – organized, signiied, subjected – is not the worst that can happen; the worst that can happen is if you throw the strata into demented or suicidal collapse, which brings them back down on us heavier than ever. This is how it should be done: lodge yourself on a stratum, experiment with the opportunities it offers, ind an advantageous place on it, ind potential movements of deterritorialization, possible lines of light, experience them, produce low conjunctions here and there, try out continuums of intensities segment by segment, have a small plot of new land at all times.” Bruno Latour has tied this form of ‘constructive’ notion of critique to democratic theory: “The critic is not the one who debunks, but the one who assembles. The critic is not the one who lifts the rugs from under the feet of the naïve believers,  Postproduction, p. . / 

but the one who offers the participants arenas in which to gather. The critic is […] the one for whom, if something is constructed, then it means it is fragile and thus in great need of care and caution.”30 Here, Latour draws upon the pragmatist philosopher John Dewey, who argued that the measure of a functioning democracy is its ability to assemble publics around issues of concern. The assembly of publics is particularly important in technologically complex situations: in cases where there are conlicting scientiic evidence and high technological risks, the publics must be brought in to settle the case. Thus, the designer ideal should no longer be the “apolitical” designer of the mid 20th century, nor the “critical” designer of the late 20th century. Instead the role of the designer is to facilitate the proliferation of publics around issues of concern, assisting them in their hacking efforts and enrich the toolbox with which we can change the situated problems. The designer is in this case not only a constructive critical actor but also a builder of applied scenarios and an explorer of possibilities where every design case with its publics and interfaces is a small effort to change and an example of “practical idealism” (to use a term by Mahatma Gadhi). CONCLUSIONS What we have tried to propose is a series of examples and ideas on how to broaden the concept of design management into practices outside the traditional models of how business is done, but also revealing some of the activist and political aspects of design also from the eyes of economy. In these examples these ields are merging into a role similar to the one of the hacker. It is a series of practices for reforming our cultural practices and the world thus incorporating a large portion of 0 Latour, B. (00) ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 0, No. . / 0

political will and vision rather than narrow economic incentives. But in this set of practices it is also important to stress the collaborative settings of how this ield evolves. It is not the work of lonesome geniuses in their chambers or of elitist cells of innovation but rather on the large wide scale connecting various publics. The forming of these publics could be said to be the focus of how this new role of design management works. It is thus not so much management in a traditional sense, and neither design in a surface sculpturing way, but instead the conscious trespassing and interface making process combining these ields into a political and activist form. It is thus a merger of many ields and the designer role in this new ield is to navigate and process the forces at play. By modulating these lows of people, proit and planet into new forms of activist design business the hacker is the post-producer of our world, assembling it into a shape for the future.

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 0

/ 

Color photos from the inal day of the workshop in the following order: Arne Nerjordet and Carlos Zachrison T-Michael Siv Støldal and Siri Johansen Ulla Chauton Photos by Rene Bent Synnevåg Styling by Karen Gjelsvik / 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

Participants in the project was: Arne Nerjordet and Carlos Zachrison (www.arne-carlos.com) Siv Støldal and Siri Johansen (www.odd.at/sivsworld) Ulla Chauton (www.katulla.com) T-Michael (www.t-michael.com) Bent Rene Synnevåg (www.notbent.com) Karen Gjelsvik (www.agentk.no) Stein Peterson (www.plus-skolen.no) Dale Sko (www.dalesko.no) Nordisk Kunstnarsenter Dalsåsen (www.nkdale.no) / 

Fjaler Næringsutvikling

Nordisk Kunstnarsenter Dalsåsen

Dale Sko hack took place in Dale i Sunnfjord 26th-28th of April 2006 and was organized by Otto von Busch in collaboration with Dale Sko and Nordisk Kunstnarsenter Dalsåsen. The project got publicity in various media during the workshop time: NRK Vestlandsrevyen (TV), NRK Sogn og Fjordane (Radio), Bergens Tidene and Firda (national and local papers). The project was generously supported by: Innovasjon Norge (www.innovasjonnorge.no) Fjaler Næringsutvikling (www.fnu.no) Norsk Kulturråd (www.kulturrad.no) IASPIS (www.iaspis.com) but could never have been done without the fantastic and enthusiastic support from Nordisk Kunstnarsenter Dalsåsen (www.nkdale.no). The shoe hackers also wants to thank the amazing people at Dale Sko for their positive ideas during the process. / 

/ 

/ 0

/ 

A project on shoe hacking by Arne Nerjordet, Carlos Zachrison, Siv Støldal, Siri Johansen, Ulla Chauton, T-Michael, Bent Rene Synnevåg, Karen Gjelsvik, Stein Peterson and Dale Sko. Organized by Otto von Busch. Text by Otto and Karl Palmås.

/