220 13 62MB
English Pages 244 [252] Year 2017
M
on
1: 900,000
Ro
p
,p
.2
00
82
14 4
p.
p.
n,
t,
or
se
rh
is
te
Bo
at
n
M
so
ut
m
H
Ca
sa
se
ai
GENEVA
te
Ba
M
M
ai
so
n
Ro
du
it
,p
.1 52
Ex
te
ns
io
n
of
th
e
H
is
to
ry
M
us
eu
m
,p
.2 10
Ri
co
la
H
Re n Ap ov a a er N r t tio b at m n Ce u e a F nt o r n n e r ru a l S t B d E , p m w ui xt 3, im ldi en .6 p. m n g s 0 72 i n , B i o n g lä o Po s f ol iri Ba s, ng se p. , p l Y 5 4 . 4 ou 0 th
BASEL
BERN
H
os
te
l,
p.
32
Cr
im
in
al
Co
ur
ts
,p
sa
d’
,p .1 6
6
ld
.2
ba
,p
ar
te
G
ta
lla
Es
Vi
.1 90
Ca
Sa n G ot ta
Tr a
ne di ct ap el ,p .1 22
ew in g To w er ,p .1 04
T Re h e fu Ye gi llo Li w ep H tg ou Fo as se re ,p ,p st .9 .1 H 0 72 ut ,p .1 00
Ch
A v e te l rs i e r in Ba a F o rd ot ill , b r p. id 1 ge 7 8 2, p. 11 4
12 8
Be
6
St
p.
p.
e,
s,
us
th
ho
Ba
st
al
ue
m
G
er
o
Th
rd
Vi
Fi ni sh in g To w er ,p .1 62
ZURICH Sw is s Ra i lw ay s
or
Se
Sp
rv
ts
ic e
Ce
ci
er
Fa
nt
t,
30
at
.2
im
y, p
ül
lit
M p. 22 0
3
FOREWORD
121
PETER ZUMTHOR
122
St Benedict Chapel
5
MILLER & MARANTA
128
Thermal Baths
6
San Gottardo Guesthouse
135
16
Villa Garbald
25
BUCHNER BRÜNDLER
143
SAVIOZ FABRIZZI
26
Casa d’Estate
144
Maison Boisset
32
Renovation and Extension of
152
Maison Roduit
161
ANDREAS FUHRIMANN
TALKING TO PETER ZUMTHOR Anna Roos
Basel Youth Hostel 40
Apartment Building, Bläsiring
GABRIELLE HÄCHLER 46
BEAUTIFUL BUSINESS
162
Finishing Tower
R. James Breiding 171
VALERIO OLGIATI
HERZOG & DE MEURON
172
The Yellow House
54
Natural Swimming Pools
178
Atelier Bardill
60
Ricola Herb Center
71
DIENER & DIENER
72
Forum 3 189
BEARTH & DEPLAZES
81
NICKISCH WALDER
190
Criminal Courts
82
Base Camp Matterhorn
200
Monte Rosa Hut
90
Refugi Lieptgas 209
:MLZD
210
Extension of the History Museum
219
STUDIO VACCHINI
220
Sports Center Mülimatt
53
184
96
SWISS ARCHITECTURE
A CULTIVATED ORDINARINESS Irina Davidovici
FROM ELSEWHERE Niall McLaughlin 99
GION A. CAMINADA
100
Forest Hut
229
EM2N
104
Viewing Tower
230
Swiss Railways Service Facility
113
JÜRG CONZETT
114
Traversina Footbridge 2
238
CONDITIONS OF PRACTICE Jean-Paul Jaccaud
FOREWORD
Building in Switzerland’s alpine topography poses a significant challenge but, at the same time,
Francesco Borromini is widely known as an Italian
forces architects to think three-dimensionally
Renaissance architect, but he was actually born
from the onset. Though one can’t talk of a Swiss style
in Bissone near Lugano in the Old Swiss Confederacy.
per se, what is evident is a certain understatement
He began his career by following his father’s foot-
and a strong sense of belonging with the context.
steps as a stonemason. Le Corbusier originally came
The extreme weather impacts on detailing; keeping
from La Chaux-de-Fonds, a small town in canton
the icy cold out and the heat inside is vital to
Neuchâtel; his father painted delicate images onto
survival. Additionally, there are not many natural
the dials of watches. Peter Zumthor, one of the most
resources like oil and steel in Switzerland, so
revered contemporary architects, was born to a
architects have had to be innovative and use the
cabinet-maker and started his career as a carpenter.
natural resources they have had at their disposal in
These examples highlight the relationship that
abundance: stone and wood.
many Swiss architects have with craftsmanship and
If the definition of sensibility is having an acute
their intimate knowledge of working with mate-
awareness and responsiveness, then the archi-
rials. It is this deep understanding of the physical
tecture presented in this book shows in myriad ways
nature of making objects out of age-old materials—
Swiss architects’ keen sensitivity to their envi-
wood, stone, glass, concrete—that shines through
ronment and history, whether it be the restrained
the buildings of many Swiss architects, both histori-
renovation of an old farmhouse in Ticino or a
cally and today.
bold new sports center in Windisch; multistory apart-
Swiss Sensibility examines the rich and deep-
ment building in Basel city or a museum in Flims
rooted tradition of architecture in Switzerland, the
village. Buildings, both large and small, each display
sensibility of many Swiss architects and a perva-
the architect’s attention to detailing and material,
sive culture of architecture. That such a small, land-
beautiful craftsmanship and precise construction.
locked country has produced such wealth of fine
The chosen kaleidoscope of buildings—all designed
architecture is testament to this tradition. The volume
by Swiss architects and built in Switzerland
of work produced in Switzerland might not seem
during the past few decades—is intended to inspire
significant when compared with larger nations, but
the reader and to convey the admiration shared
the resonance and influence of the work is con-
by many. Each project is examined with the aid of
siderable. Swiss Sensibility traces the history of this
texts, photographs, and drawings. Twenty-five
trajectory, examining the country’s architectural pros-
projects from across the country by fifteen architec-
perity and the development of its many talented
tural practices are interspersed with four essays
architects.
by prominent intellectuals—three of whom are archi-
Why is it that architects in Switzerland have man-
tects—and an interview with a distinguished archi-
aged to achieve their standard of excellence? What
tect. Each text focuses on a different aspect of
are the forces at play that have combined to create
Swiss architecture: James Breiding looks at the his-
the fertile ground for the discipline to flourish?
toric development of architecture over the centuries,
Switzerland’s intricate linguistic and cultural borders,
Niall McLaughlin critically examines the phenom-
and the variety of its vernacular architecture, are
enon of Swiss architecture from the perspective of a
counterbalanced by its strong tradition of cosmo-
“pure outsider,” Irina Davidovici looks at the cultural
politanism. Switzerland has a large reservoir of small,
models on which the production of contemporary
creative practices that support a sophisticated
architecture in Switzerland is based, while Jean-Paul
culture of building design. This resource, coupled with
Jaccaud scrutinizes the conditions of practice in
an excellent standard of architectural education,
Switzerland, comparing and contrasting them with
high quality craftsmanship, and a tradition of open
Anglo-Saxon countries. The interview at the heart
competitions allowing new talent to emerge, are
of the book gives the reader a fascinating insight into
all aspects that influence the production of architec-
the intensely personal design process of the emi-
ture in this country. In most countries the role of
nent architect, Peter Zumthor.
the architect has been diminished, whereas in Switzer-
Swiss Sensibility is not about promoting a brand,
land architects still tend to have authorship of
but rather sets out to illustrate the broad approach
their work; steering their designs from the sketch
to a highly valued discipline. The book is an explo-
stage all the way through to the finished building.
ration of the difference and uniqueness that gives this small country its great architectural reputation and pays homage to architecture produced with dedication, passion, and integrity. Anna Roos
3
MILLER & MARANTA
My incentive to pick up a pencil in the morning at all, is the search for knowledge. Quintus Miller
5
MILLER & MARANTA
Having asked themselves how a contemporary
SAN GOTTARDO GUESTHOUSE
building might be constructed on the basis of a
GOTTHARD PASS
vernacular construction typology, the architects drew
2008–2010
their inspiration from rural buildings in canton Uri, where timber has been used within massive walls
For thousands of years the Gotthard Pass has been
since the fifteenth century. With great sensibility
an important threshold between north and south
they had to strike a balance between remaining true
Europe and for many centuries has played a signifi-
to the historic meaning of the building, while also
cant role in the economy and culture of central
acknowledging the present and creating a striking
Switzerland. Since the early thirteenth century, the
contemporary building. Their first strategy was
pass has been a vital trade route connecting different
to radically hollow out the building, leaving only the
cultures and language regions. Caravans of mer-
outer walls, with their elegant, double-bowed win-
chants transporting grain, wine, rice, and salt, even
dows, and the granite stair on the first level. Secondly,
entire armies trekked over the pass. During the
the building was raised by a level and finally the
nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the Gotthard
chapel and hostel were unified beneath an enormous
Pass was imbued with an almost mythological status
lead roof. By raising the building by one level
symbolizing the independence of Switzerland.
more rooms could be accommodated and the volume
Thus, as Alpentransversale, the pass is strategically,
could become more prominent, thus creating an
culturally, and historically significant.
optical focus on the Alp. It is the slender bell-tower
At the summit of the Gotthard Pass is a scattering
that divides the great faceted volume into two parts:
of buildings between two lakes; these include the
sacred/secular, chapel/hostel. The muted coarse
old lodgings—now a museum—and Hotel St Gotthard.
plaster and gray lead roof echo the color of the craggy
Archaeological artifacts indicate the presence of
rocks surrounding the building and blend it into
a chapel on the site since pre-Roman times, while the
the landscape.
hostel, alongside the chapel, has been dated to the
Logistically the construction of the building
year 1623. The two buildings have a history of misfor-
posed a daunting challenge, as there is only a short
tune: first they were destroyed by an avalanche in
window of snow-free time during summer when
1774 and then again by fire in 1905. Each reconstruc-
construction is viable. This constraint required inno-
tion left a layer of history.
vative thinking and meticulous planning. To radically
Thanks to support by the Fondazione Pro San
reduce in-situ construction time, the large timber
Gottardo, the revitalization and refurbishment of the
cladding elements for the interiors were assembled
structures was made possible. Six architectural
in the valley below and hauled up the mountain
practices were invited to take part in a competition.
where they could be rapidly installed. Clad entirely
Basel-based office, Miller & Maranta was awarded
with untreated, spruce wood, the individual rooms
the commission in 2005. As design professor
throughout have an almost monastic atmosphere
at Mendrisio Academy of Architecture in Ticino,
intended to intensify one’s perception of the majestic
Quintus Miller, with his partner Paola Maranta, play
and austere surrounding landscape. The precision
an important role in the architectural discourse in
of the carpentry is truly admirable. With the joinery,
Switzerland. Their work was showcased at the Venice
time-old vernacular Alpine architecture has been
Biennale in 2012.
interpreted in an intensely modern manner. At the same time, the wood-scented rooms still evoke an atmosphere of archaic beauty. It is the perfectly meted understatement one often sees in Swiss architecture that gives it its force. Each room has been named after previous distinguished visitors to the hostel from past eras: Goethe, Honoré de Balzac, and Petrarch to name a few. Nowadays the rooms cater for a new age of tourists: alpine cyclists and mountaineers. Architecturally, it is the monumental south front and the monolithic lead roof that have the greatest visual impact. Miller & Maranta has rejuvenated the building and elevated its status as is fitting for its historic and strategic significance on the Gotthard. Standing proud, facing southward, the building has a sense of self-evident belonging to the site, as if it had never been any different. The architecture is restrained, but it is also powerful.
6
For years this adage has accompanied us: “Tradition doesn’t mean preserving the ashes, but rather keeping the fires burning.” Miller & Maranta
7
8
9
10
11
12
SOUTH ELEVATION
1:200
13
3RD FLOOR 1ST FLOOR
1:200
14
SECTION
15
Rather than being built from bottom to top,
MILLER & MARANTA VILLA GARBALD
Villa Garbald is constructed from outside to inside.
CASTASEGNA
The structural core is the fireplace around which
2004
the staircase winds up from the seminar space on the ground floor towards the apex “depositing” bed-
Quintus Miller and Paola Maranta play a central
rooms as it spirals upward. The displacement of the
role in the production and discourse of architecture
rooms and the constant shifting of levels are trans-
in Switzerland. Their approach to architecture has
lated through to the freely floating apertures on
been strongly influenced by Aldo Rossi’s theories of
the facades. As the window frames are concealed and
Analogue Architecture absorbed while studying at
are flush with the reveals, the openings read like
the ETH in the 1980s. Part of their education involved
punctured bird holes in the four facades and empha-
analyzing ephemeral aspects of the discipline, like
size the three-dimensionality and abstract form
the emotional effect that architecture has on people
in-the-round. To echo the rustic texture of the
and the atmosphere of a space. With their analogue
enclosing garden walls, granite from the Maira River
architecture, they sought to embed architecture
was added as an aggregate to the concrete mix
into its setting and promote the creation of a strong
of the tower walls. To bring this aggregate to the fore-
relationship of a building to its context. According
ground, the concrete surfaces were etched with
to this theory, buildings should be ambiguous and
high-pressure water in a process called hydro-abra-
multi-faceted enabling them to be read in a variety
sion; this requires highly skilled craftsmanship
of ways, changing their function over time.
to get a unified overall texture. This “assault” on the
Miller & Maranta’s Villa Garbald is situated close
surfaces, to create their rough tactility, heightens
to the border in the village Castasegna in an
the organic, rustic nature of the building, binding it
Italian-speaking valley in canton Graubünden. Dense,
into the landscape and echoing the surfaces of
multi-level farmhouses give the village an urban
the garden walls and surrounding farm buildings.
feel. The guesthouse replaces an old hay barn and
Miller & Maranta has set up a sophisticated dialogue
stands above an elegant villa designed for the Garbald
between the new villa and its historic context.
family in 1863–1864 by the first professor of archi-
Interestingly, the architects say that when they
tecture at the ETH, Gottfried Semper. In 1955 the
design a specific room, they start with its atmos-
last descendant of the Garbald family set up a founda-
phere. Budget constraint was no obstacle but they
tion, which was later able to recruit the Collegium
nevertheless managed to create simple, perhaps
Helveticum to collaborate on the creation of a refuge
spartan, but high-quality interior spaces. Meticulous
for intellectual debate and dialogue, spearheaded
care was taken with the finishes—with the con-
by a competition held in 2001, which was won by
struction of the broken-white, smooth lime plaster
Miller & Maranta.
walls and the carpentry of the doors, windows,
What makes Miller & Maranta’s building remark-
shutters, and furniture. With its raw surfaces and
able is the manner of its construction and its
powerful, sculptural form, Miller & Maranta
amorphous, crystalline form. The project starts with
has created a new contemporary language for alpine
a garden wall encircling the site, creating a private
architecture using some of the deeply engrained
enclave within. Inspired by Roccoli, or Italian
lessons on Analogue Architecture they learnt decades
bird-catching towers, the six-story building stands
ago in Zurich.
proudly, like an abstract, monolithic sculpture in a garden. The tower declares itself as a dominant form, set against the landscape and the sky. By contorting the plan off the perpendicular, randomly placing the windows, and expressing the surfaces, the architects have enhanced the monolithic, abstract feel of the building. The polygonal plan is a continuation of the rustic garden wall and curved walkways that meander across the site linking one building to the other. The amorphous, angled plan is mirrored in the articulation of the roof that kinks up rather cheekily towards Semper’s elegant villa below.
When we have to design a specific room, we begin with its atmosphere. Miller & Maranta
16
17
18
19
20
GROUND FLOOR
1:300
21
4TH FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 1ST FLOOR
1:300
22
WEST ELEVATION SECTION
1:300
23
BUCHNER BRÜNDLER
Switzerland is a model for the balance between humans and nature. Buchner Bründler
25
BUCHNER BRÜNDLER
The intermediary timber floor of the hayloft
CASA D’ESTATE
was removed to reveal the full six-meter height space
LINESCIO
where the open plan living and dining room are
2009 – 2010
situated. Folding timber shutters shut out the light from two high south-facing window openings.
Traditional buildings in the Italian part of Switzerland
A fireplace sits directly on the concrete floor, giving
are constructed with local granite and have slate
the space an archaic atmosphere when a fire is
or granite roofs. In Ticino, there are stone footpaths
lit on cool summer nights. The bath is not a tub; it is
in the valleys that date back millennia to the era
a recessed trough in the floor, like a miniature pool.
of the Silk Road when traders passed from the Far East
Taking a bath in this bathroom must be a novel
to the West. The summerhouse, Casa d’Estate situ-
experience. The showerhead extends high above and
ated in the secluded Vallemaggia, thirty kilometers
arcs over the beam to spray down in a mini waterfall.
north of Locarno, lay abandoned for half a century
Recessed lighting behind the sink unit illuminates
before Daniel Buchner and Andreas Bründler turned
the rough granite surface from below: a theatrical
their attention to reviving it. From the exterior,
gesture. In this way, the architects play with textures,
their intervention is all but invisible. A swivel glass
highlighting the sensuous surface quality of the
door, flush with the outer granite facade, and a
materials and heightening one’s awareness of the
concrete chimney are the only hints of the transfor-
spaces.
mation that has taken place within the 650-mm-thick, 200-year-old stone walls. The decision to restrict occupation to the warm
What is remarkable about this renovation is its restraint; the architects have allowed the 200year-old stone building to retain its stature as
summer months enabled the architects to leave
an enduring piece of architecture that has survived
the stone walls untouched and do without heating:
over the centuries and will surely continue to
a bold decision that freed the architects, allow-
stand for centuries to come.
ing them to forgo triple-glazed windows and radiators. Every new element in the renovation is constructed from concrete: the new window reveals, floors, and built-in elements. Accessing the interior through the roof, concrete was poured layer by layer into the void between the rough stone walls and the lightly textured timber formwork, creating a house within a house like a Russian babushka doll.
26
27
28
29
30
SECTION SITE PLAN
GROUND FLOOR
1:500
1:200
31
The foyer is generous and light; all service spaces
BUCHNER BRÜNDLER RENOVATION AND EXTENSION OF
like the office, lift, stairwell, and seminar room are
BASEL YOUTH HOSTEL
situated against the slope, to the rear of the building.
ST ALBAN, BASEL
Jean Prouvé chairs and tawny leather sofas invite
2009 – 2010
visitors to sit and chat. Wide steps descend into the communal dining space, the historical silk dying
Youth hostels are no longer frequented solely by
rooms, where dividing walls were removed to reveal
students and backpackers traveling on a shoestring
a series of brick arches that produce a rhythm of
budget. Nowadays, travelers of every age make
elegant curves enclosing the space. The patterned
up a large proportion of their clientele. Although each
texture of the painted white brickwork creates a
youth hostel is unique, they all have in common
subtle contrast with the off-white plastered columns.
an ambition to be sustainable and ecological, as well
A stark, folded steel staircase in an aubergine-
as to provide a high standard of accommodation.
colored stairwell lends both an industrial and artistic
Swiss youth hostels frequently win awards for the
impression to the vertical circulation. Altogether
best youth hostels internationally as they are
forty-eight rooms of varying sizes are arranged
well conceived, perfectly clean, and have high quality
in three upper levels strung along passageways termi-
architecture.
nating in floor-to-ceiling high windows that bring
Basel’s youth hostel was originally a silk ribbon
in light and views. Transparent colored peep-
factory built in 1850–1851. It was first renovated into
hole openings in the masonry walls allow for fleeting
a youth hostel in the late 1970s. As the former factory
glimpses of activity within the rooms; a delightful
is heritage protected, any alteration had to be
gesture that enlivens the passageways. The rooms
sensitively undertaken. In 2007, Basel-based archi-
themselves have been constructed in a combination
tects, Buchner Bründler won the commission to
of concrete and glazed plywood, while the furni-
design a new renovation and extension, which was
ture is solid oak. There is a robust, direct use of
completed three years later.
materials. Ribbon-like balconies extend the rooms
Situated alongside a stream in St Alban, a pic-
and create an exterior connection between neigh-
turesque quarter close to the Rhine River, the
boring units allowing guests to socialize with
youth hostel is nestled among tall trees. Before one
one another. Buchner Bründler has shown that it is
even enters the building, Buchner Bründler’s inter-
possible to enhance an old building with a con-
vention can be seen; a delicate timber footbridge
temporary extension and create architecture that is
links Maja Sacher-Platz to the entrance and merges
functional and aesthetic in equal measure.
into a light timber walkway that leads one to an enclosed terrace overlooking the foliage. This walkway forms a base held by vertical oak fins that echo the tree trunks, enclosing and visually binding old and new together, as well as filtering views in and out of the building.
We believe in the possibility of architecture to transform places. Buchner Bründler
32
33
34
35
36
GROUND FLOOR
1:400
37
SECTION NORTH ELEVATION
1:400
38
1ST FLOOR
39
BUCHNER BRÜNDLER APARTMENT BUILDING, BLÄSIRING BASEL 2011–2012
Facing the street, sentinel-like, this six-story apartment building in Basel refers to the height of other, taller buildings in the neighborhood, rather than to the adjacent double-story houses. The narrow site and the vertical proportions make the building vaguely reminiscent of a traditional Amsterdam grachten rowhouse; although it is rather more austere, it retains its own contemporary charm. By stacking the two, three-level apartments vertically, the architects were able to optimize the narrow site and retain a rear garden. As the building is held between its neighboring houses, so the rooms are also contained between two concrete walls longitudinally like bookends. In contrast, the short facades are opened up to the street front and the rear garden with floor-to-ceiling glazing allowing natural light to penetrate into the deep plan. The floor plan is organized around a service core that houses the stairwell, kitchens, and bathrooms, all seemingly carved out of raw concrete. The fireplace, also concrete, juts out confidently into the living area. The hearth is flush with the floor and the wood is ignited directly on the base giving a gritty, archaic feel to the space. The embossed grain of the timber shuttering has been left visible, leaving the material raw and untreated, reflecting the process of its making. The lack of pre-manufactured fittings like basins, baths, and shelves—which are all cast in solid concrete—enhances the plastic, modeled effect and highlights the elemental power of the material. The use of honey-colored oak window frames and cupboard door panels tempers and enriches the stark, gray concrete wall and ceiling surfaces. From the street, the facade displays a carefully balanced interplay of timber, glass, steel, and concrete surfaces. It is not surprising that this project won the Architekturpreis Beton 2013, as it is an eloquent essay in the sculptural use of concrete, carved and carefully formed to model space. Buchner Bründler has mastered a sensuous use of concrete, a material which has played a central role in architecture in Switzerland for over a century.
40
41
42
43
44
SECTION GROUND FLOOR
1:200
45
3RD FLOOR
4 TH FLOOR
BEAUTIFUL BUSINESS
Swiss Achievement in Architecture
R. James Breiding
46
Why does Switzerland, a tiny, landlocked country, with most of its terrain uninhabitable, have the highest per capita number of Pritzker Prize winners in the world? How did a country spawn, in a short space of time such standout architects as Le Corbusier, Mario Botta, Jacques Herzog, Pierre de Meuron, and Peter Zumthor with their landmarks defining cities throughout the world? This essay examines those aspects that have led to Swiss distinction in architecture and provides a brief survey of those people who have contributed most to Swiss achievement in this sector. The concept of a nation encompasses a myriad of endless considerations: history, climate, topography, language, religion, its balance between the individual and the community, the extent or lack of resources and wealth, its values and social norms; just to name a few. From this interminable list, three attributes of “Swissness” come to my mind when I reflect on what may explain the country’s remarkable contribution to architecture as we know it today. First, Switzerland has long been a nation that has thrived on openness. A trading post during the Roman Empire offering conquest to the north and protection to the south; it fuels the source of the Rhine flowing to the south and the Rhône flowing to the north; the two rivers that served as the commercial vertebrae of trade throughout central Europe until the invention of railroads. Switzerland also served as a corridor for those traversing east and west as part of their pilgrimage to, or from, Santiago de Compostela. Up until the nineteenth century the leading export of Switzerland was its male youth, who were the most prized mercenaries fighting in the ceaseless wars that marred Europe for most of its civilizations (to this day Swiss guards defend the Vatican). All of this created a fountain of opportunity for the exchange of ideas, talent, and technique. The Swiss traveled, met, learnt languages, married local women or men, so they were probably more acutely aware of latest developments than more provincial societies. The second feature of Switzerland is its unique political framework. The basic task for any political system is to mediate smoothly between competing interest groups and power blocs in order to permit a broader public interest to prevail. History shows us repeatedly that there is a natural tendency for power to centralize. Most of history has been about the formation, rise, and ultimate destruction of empires. Think of Egypt, Greece, Rome, the Spanish Armada, Napoleon, Bismarck, or the British Empire. Switzerland is unique in that it is built from the bottom up and is one of the rare exceptions that has managed to preserve local and regional hegemony over central command and control tendencies of governance. The Swiss have a sharp disdain for centralized power of any kind. Professor Harold James, of Princeton, once told me that Swiss cities like Basel, Geneva, Lucerne, Neuchâtel, St Gallen, and Zurich still resemble medieval city-states, with local dialects, customs, considerable autonomy, and a meritocratic attitude towards achievement of recognition. This is relevant to architecture because it has long provided an abundant and diverse source of commissions for aspiring Swiss architects. There are 26 cantons and 2,249 communes, each with budgets to render commissions and ambitious architects wishing to outdo one another. Collectively it is a laboratory for architectural experiment and individually a dream for any budding architect. A particular combination of precision and frugality is the second characteristic of Swiss architecture. Calvin and Zwingli, two of the most influential protagonists of the Protestant reformation, came from Switzerland. For more than 1,000 years, the Catholic Church dominated the minds and hearts of people. Most commissions issued by the Church or monarchies were assigned on the basis of an architect’s talent for veneration and artistic aesthetics. Those mandating were looking for the superlative: the most grandiose, the most ostentatious, the most imaginative. Calvinism precluded its members from partaking in such contests, or even professions. To distinguish oneself, one’s work was only considered superior if it was more efficient, more resistant, of superior engineering, or other forms of measurable improvement. From these beginnings emerged a particular attention to materials, detail, and functionality that continues to manifest itself today. There is a famous expression in German “mehr sein als scheinen” (more substance than appearance)—which seems to be an intricate part of the Swiss DNA—whether it is a watchmaker in Le Locle, a turbine manufacturer at ABB, or an architect at Herzog & de Meuron.
47
Reliability and trustworthiness are the final factors that come to mind. Living in the mountains is characterized by considerable uncertainty. Avalanches or floods can wipe out valleys; adverse weather can isolate people for weeks at a time and poor conditions can impact harvests needed to see villages through the winter. Because of this, the Swiss tend to be cautious people and prone to building not for day-to-day life, but for those rare, but inevitable calamities. Reliability is measured during times of hardship, not under fair weather conditions. And from reliability, comes trust. Architectural budgets can amount to large sums of money and are often funded by taxpayers. Meeting budgets and finishing on time may not always be a decisive criterion, but it can provide an edge. Having looked at those characteristics exemplary of Swiss architecture, let us now sketch through its historical development. BALANCE, UNITY—AND BUSINESS Both architecture and art dealing have become important parts of Switzerland’s economy in a characteristically Swiss way—discreetly—drawing on the Swiss tendencies to build from the bottom up, strive for balance and utility, and hold firm to an independent approach. Yet the ambiguous relationship of many Swiss cultural figures to their homeland is revealing. The sense that Switzerland is a somewhat stifling environment has deep historical roots. In pre-industrial Switzerland, art and creative architecture did not easily find their place. In contrast to its European neighbors, Switzerland had no princely courts with royal families to act as patrons of the arts to enhance their power and prestige. Such frivolities were alien to the Swiss mentality. Money—when available—was to be spent on sensible things. Not surprisingly, the first signs of artistic flair in Switzerland manifested themselves in architecture, where aesthetic values could be worked discreetly into a practical or religious design. ITALY WAS THE CRUCIBLE Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, the most important Swiss architects came from south of the Alps in the Italian-speaking canton of Ticino, and their main destination was Rome. One of them, Domenico Fontana, was the successor to Michelangelo as the chief architect of the Basilica of St Peter. Fontana’s nephew, Carlo Maderno, completed the Basilica. In the final years before the consecration of St Peter’s in 1629, another Swiss architect, Francesco Castelli, was working on the site. Adopting the surname Borromini, he made his reputation with the Church of San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane, on the Quirinal Hill, setting the Roman baroque style. A generation later, another emigrant, Domenico Trezzini, left Astano near Lugano, to make his career abroad. After the obligatory training in Rome, Trezzini found his way to Russia, where the tsar, Peter the Great, appointed him as city planner for his new capital, St Petersburg. For thirty years, until his death, Trezzini worked on the layout of the city and constructed some of its most important buildings, including the Cathedral of St Peter and St Paul and the Summer and Winter Palaces for the tsars. He also introduced a master’s diploma in architectural studies there. In Switzerland it would be another 150 years before an equivalent institution for training architects was created. ARCHITECTURE IN DEMAND Around 1800, the architectural profession underwent a profound change. The rise of a prosperous middle class led to a huge increase in the number and variety of building commissions. At the same time, mercantile values and industrial production methods brought ideas of efficiency to the construction site—clients now wanted to see a return on their investment within a reasonable period. The planning and execution of prestigious buildings required academically trained architects who could master complex logistics and were thoroughly familiar with whichever architectural style was demanded.
48
In the first half of the nineteenth century, Switzerland made scarcely any contribution to these trends—architects acquired their training in France and Germany and brought the current styles back to Switzerland. But the founding in 1855 of the Eidgenössisches Polytechnikum, later the ETH, was a turning point. The recently established Federal Government succeeded in bringing to the school a noted German architect, Gottfried Semper. Along with his close friend, composer Richard Wagner, Semper had been involved in the May uprising against the Kingdom of Saxony in Dresden in 1849. The revolt collapsed, and Semper and Wagner had to leave the city to avoid arrest. Semper fled to Paris and later to London, while Wagner went to Zurich. A few years later, Wagner used his connections to bring Semper to the newly founded Polytechnikum. Semper was not only commissioned to design the school buildings on a terrace overlooking the city center, but also appointed the highest-paid professor at the new university. Semper believed that learning on the job should play an important part in the life of an architect, and this approach has been followed at the ETH ever since. A TIME OF LIBERATION Thanks to the ETH and its appointment of Semper, Switzerland slowly began to become a force in European architecture. This was a period of rapid growth in Swiss cities and architects received many new commissions: for railway stations, theaters, hotels, banks, and central post offices. The models for these buildings were found in the capitals of Europe, chiefly Paris, Munich and Vienna, yet Swiss architects gradually began to offer interpretations of their own, overlaying a characteristically Swiss approach, bringing a sense of what was feasible and affordable. Gradually, a modern architecture liberated from traditional styles began to emerge. With the appointment to the ETH in 1915 of a Swiss architect, Karl Moser, architectural training evolved further. Moser had spent time in Paris and Italy, and had set up a successful architectural partnership in Karlsruhe, Germany, gaining an international reputation. He produced designs for the Badische railway terminus in Basel (1913), Zurich University (1918), and the Kunsthaus art gallery in Zurich (1910). Moser exemplified the so-called “Reform” style that developed around 1900, based on the idea that function, form, and design should be conveyed in an indissoluble unity and that form was to be governed by utility. Clearly, the Reform style had links with the modern movement in art. Swiss modernism was marked by the practical philosophy of toleration that underpinned daily coexistence in a small, but diverse country. At the same time there was an openness to trends from other countries; under Moser, the ETH abandoned Semper’s “academic architecture” in favor of designing real buildings and encouraging quality and craftsmanship. THE IMPACT OF LE CORBUSIER In architecture, the impact of modernism became fully visible in Switzerland in the first decades of the twentieth century. Karl Moser’s cosmopolitan realism influenced generations of architects, who still invoked his name decades later. Perhaps the most famous protagonist of this modernism was Charles-Edouard Jeanneret-Gris, who later called himself Le Corbusier. He was born in the Swiss town of La Chaux-de-Fonds and attended the School of Applied Arts there. He was trained as an engraver and chaser, but soon switched to architecture. During the First World War he moved permanently to Paris, where he established an architectural practice with his cousin, Pierre Jeanneret. In 1918, Le Corbusier met a Basel banker, Raoul La Roche, who was in the process of building up an important collection of Cubist paintings. A friendship developed between the two men, which culminated in the building of the Villa La Roche in 1923. The house, in Paris’s 16th arrondissement, became an icon of modernism and is still a place of pilgrimage for architects.
49
A RAGE TO CREATE THE NEW CITY Le Corbusier’s ambitions went beyond building private homes for wealthy friends, though: in Le Corbusier: A Life, Nicholas Fox Weber writes about Le Corbusier’s desire to “raze large parts of existing cities” to build apartments that would provide better living conditions. Le Corbusier’s vision of the modern city consisted of large, unornamented apartment buildings set upon pilotis (he was one of the first architects to take into account the effects of the automobile on urban agglomeration). Though considered a pioneer of modern architecture, he was not without his critics, including Jane Jacobs, who in The Death and Life of Great American Cities argued that his buildings had a negative effect on social development. Le Corbusier’s rhetorical talent, his aggressive and confrontational personality, and his radical architecture stripped of all adornment quickly placed him at the head of the avant-garde movement. With manifestos such as Toward an Architecture (1923), City Planning (1925), and Five Points for a New Architecture (1927), he provided the fundamental arguments for the “new construction.” SWITZERLAND AND THE BAUHAUS A crucial influence on the development of Swiss modernism came from the Bauhaus, an arts and crafts school founded in Weimar in 1919. Throughout the 1920s, ambitious artists and designers congregated there from all over Europe. On the staff from the beginning was Johannes Itten, a Swiss painter and color theorist, whose teaching skill and charisma dominated the school for its first four years. Itten, who had studied at a teacher-training college in Bern, devised the foundation course at the Bauhaus, which was later adopted by many schools of applied arts in German-speaking countries and to this day has a place in the curriculum. In 1928, a Basel architect and founding member of the CIAM, Hannes Meyer, succeeded Walter Gropius as director of the Bauhaus. Meyer set up a department of architecture and positioned the Bauhaus, already permeated with political ideology, even further to the left. In the conservative atmosphere of Dessau, this led to considerable tension. Under intense pressure, magnified by the rise of the Nazis, Meyer was forced to give up his post in 1930. He moved on to Moscow, but soon fell out with the Stalinist regime and returned to Switzerland in 1936. Meyer had little opportunity to design and build, but he made an essential contribution to the development of architecture. ARCHITECTURE AND WAR DON’T MIX Unlike the art market, Swiss architecture was impoverished by the Second World War. The exchange of ideas with foreign countries came to a standstill, and tendencies towards compromise and regional traditionalism became stronger. Only Le Corbusier in Paris remained committed to the ideals of the avant-garde, and immediately after the war ended he achieved an international breakthrough when the original design for the headquarters of the newly created United Nations organization in New York came from his drawing board. Le Corbusier’s language of form eventually moved away from white, hard-edged cubes towards a more emotive, sculptural interpretation of concrete. With the chapel of Notre-Dame-du-Haut in Ronchamp, eastern France, he achieved what many regard as his chef d’oeuvre, a place of religious and architectural pilgrimage. THE POST-CORBUSIER GENERATION By the early 1970s, the canton of Ticino returned to the forefront of international architectural practice, thanks largely to Mario Botta and a group of Ticinese architects later known as Tendenza. Botta had studied in Venice and then worked briefly for Le Corbusier in 1965. Five years later he set up his own practice in Mendrisio, Ticino, where the private houses he built in the early 1970s attracted international attention. The Museum of Modern Art in San Francisco, completed in 1995, and the cathedral in the French town of Evry, consecrated in the same year, mark the high points of his career in the view of many critics.
50
Botta is not the only Swiss architect to make an international impact while remaining anchored in Switzerland. Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron, both born in 1950, set up their architectural practice in Basel in 1978 after graduating from the ETH. From the beginning, Herzog & de Meuron has sought to bring their work close to art, often working with an artist from the Jura, Rémy Zaugg. From this dynamic of artistic collaboration they draw a stream of new ideas, both for conceptual work and for actual buildings. INTELLECT AND EMOTION Herzog and de Meuron are known as intellectuals, yet their buildings always arouse strong emotions. In Basel’s main railway station, it is the central signal box, entirely clad in copper strips, that made the architects known to a wider public. They broke through to international recognition in 2000, when they converted the vast Bankside Power Station on the south bank of the Thames in London into an art gallery for Tate Modern. Since then, major projects have followed in rapid succession, the most famous to date being the National Stadium built for the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. In 2001, they were awarded the Hyatt Foundation’s Pritzker Prize, considered the “Nobel Prize for Architecture,” and in 2007 they received the Praemium Imperiale of the Japan Art Association. A different path to international success was taken by Peter Zumthor from Oberwil near Basel, who trained as a cabinet-maker. He later studied at the Pratt Institute in New York before returning to Switzerland, where he settled in Haldenstein and set up in practice as an architect; from there his reputation quickly spread by word of mouth. Zumthor takes a lot of time over his projects, letting them mature in his head and on paper, and turns down numerous lucrative commissions. This “slow architecture” as he calls it, is epitomized in his thermal baths in the Graubünden mountain village of Vals (see page 128). Built in 1996, the number of visitors has been so great that the management eventually had to introduce a quota system. Zumthor’s largest building to date is the Kolumba Museum of Art, completed for the archdiocese of Cologne in 2007. In the two years that followed, despite the modest volume of his work, he too was awarded first the Praemium Imperiale and then the Pritzker Prize. Herzog & de Meuron and Zumthor rank among the world’s most famous architects. However, their success is based on two completely different models of thinking and working. NO LONGER A LUXURY This essay demonstrates that the influence of Swiss architecture is greater than the volume of activity. Swiss architects build all over the world, and in the art trade Switzerland is established as an important hub, along with New York, London, and Paris. The markets for art and architecture have boomed in the past fifty years. Until the 1950s, cultural products were luxury items for elites. Now they are sought by a far wider public. CRITICAL CREATIVE DENSITY A rough idea of the economic importance of the cultural sector in the wider sense (that is, the sum total of advertising, film, literature, music, the press, graphics, architecture, and art) is provided by Philipp Klaus, a geographer, in his study City, Culture and Innovation. He estimates that in Zurich alone in 2001, 8.4% of the city’s working population was engaged in these activities. By both national and international standards this is a high number, and one that suggests that Zurich—along with a few other centers such as Basel and Geneva—has achieved a critical density of creative networks that in the world of cultural production and trade adds up to global significance. The businesses of design and art trading have a crucial characteristic in common, which is that they have a self-sustaining dynamic: quality attracts quality, and ideas generate ideas. This virtuous circle is working well in Switzerland, and it is difficult to think of a reason that it will not continue to do so. References Allenspach, Christoph. Architektur in der Schweiz —Bauen im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Pro Helvetia Schweizer Kulturstiftung, Zurich, 1998. Frampton, Kenneth. Modern Architecture: A Critical Building History. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1983. Zumthor, Peter. Thinking Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1998. Adapted from: Breiding, R. James. SWISS MADE—The Untold Story Behind Switzerland’s Success. London: Profile Books, 2013.
51
HERZOG & DE MEURON
The greatest inspiration is the existing world in all its ugliness and normality. Jacques Herzog
53
HERZOG & DE MEURON
Clearly, the heart of the scheme is the large egg-
NATURAL SWIMMING POOLS
shaped bathing pool, which offers an opportunity
RIEHEN
for non-swimmers and swimmers alike to cool them-
2010–2014
selves in the clear green waters. Low curved stairs descend deeper and deeper into the depths, like
Sometimes projects take decades to be realized.
ripples following the curve of the pool perimeter. Wide
The need to replace the obsolete public pools in
timber jetties slide across the water surface tying
Riehen dates back to 1979 when the local community
the pool back into the land and allowing swimmers to
initiated an architectural competition won by Basel-
dive directly into the deep area of the pool. It is an
based Herzog & de Meuron. During the intervening
elegant and sensitively conceived project, which will
decades the concept for the pools was radically
surely be a hub for local swimmers to enjoy the
altered and a conventional swimming facility with its
summer reprieve from the long winter months. Hope-
mechanical systems and chemical water treatments
fully this project will inspire planners of future
was abandoned in favor of a biological filtration
public pools to consider green, chemical-free options
system. Thus, the chlorinated pool morphed into an
to promote healthy, ecological, chlorine-free
oval body of sweet water fringed by plant-filtering
swimming.
cascades, where water is purified in the same way that it is filtered in nature, through layer upon layer of gravel, sand, and soil. The Swiss are passionate about their public bathing pools and there are myriads of idyllic pools on the banks of rivers and lakes throughout the country. For their Riehen pools, Herzog & de Meuron took their cue from the traditional timber Badis strung along the riverbanks of the Rhine. Nestled in a hollow beneath undulating rows of grapevines, the new pools are enclosed by a continuous larch wood screen surrounding three borders of the wedgeshaped site. In places the screen wall bulges gently outward to accommodate changing rooms, while smooth gray planes of concrete hold the showerheads and screen the changing cabins from view. To the northeast, the timber screen wall curves to enclose an entrance area where changing rooms, toilets, and a cafeteria are housed. The slender timber rafters that support the roof create an even, rhythmic pattern delicately tracing the perimeter edge that is framed by a high belt of green trees. In effect, the surrounding timber wall creates a sanctuary and a two hundred-meter-long solarium for sun lovers. A deep covered veranda is an intermediary space leading off the cafeteria where parents are able to keep an eye on their children in the shallow paddling pool.
54
55
56
A
B
B
A
SITE PLAN
1:1,000
57
SECTION A
DETAIL SECTION B
1:400
1:100
58
59
HERZOG & DE MEURON
Sustainability and conservation of energy were
RICOLA HERB CENTER
integral to Herzog & de Meuron’s concept from the
LAUFEN
onset of the design process. Forty-five-centimeter-
2014
thick earth walls regulate the humidity and temperature of the internal spaces, providing a constant
Herzog & de Meuron’s Ricola Herb Center echoes the
internal climate. Coupled with the use of photo-
long lines of hedges and the low-lying forms of
voltaic cells on the roof and the reuse of waste heat
the Jura Mountains in the distance. The extenuated
from the production center nearby, energy consump-
length reflects the linear procession of drying, cutting,
tion was reduced by an impressive 90%. Further-
blending, and storing the herbs used to create
more, 99% of the materials for the earth walls were
Ricola herbal pastilles. World-renowned architects,
quarried within a circumference of ten kilometers
Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron are known
from the site, while the rammed earth blocks were
for their experimental and radical use of materials.
made a mere three kilometers from the site. A skele-
Their attitude to architecture is exploratory and often
ton matrix of concrete columns supports the roof
playful, revealing their curiosity of the world. The
and mitigates against the force of wind pressure on
sheer range of their oeuvre, both geographically and
the expansive wall planes.
typologically, is indicative of this open-minded
As a counterpoint to the rectilinearity of
approach. Materials and detailing are used in different
the volume, each facade has a single, circular window
and innovative ways. Both architects have a deep
attached to the wall plane, like a great ornamental
fascination for the work of fine artists and often find
brooch on the body of the building. These large, round
inspiration for their designs by collaborating with
openings together with ribbons of skylights above
them. For a previous commission by Ricola, the archi-
illuminate the four main production spaces with
tects used an image of a 1920s Karl Blossfeldt
natural light. From the vantage point of the visitors’
photograph printed onto translucent polycarbonate
center on the upper level, one can view the lofty
panels for the facades. For this, their most recent
spaces below. The great halls are permeated with the
and their seventh commission for Ricola, the
tangy aroma of peppermint, elderflower, sage, and
architects chose to use millennia-old, rammed-earth
thyme.
construction techniques. By quarrying loam, marl,
Herzog & de Meuron’s architectural repertoire
and coarse aggregate from local mines, 670, 4.6-
includes spectacular buildings like London’s Tate
tonne massive blocks were formed and assembled to
Modern and Beijing’s Olympic Stadium; as with their
create the 111-meter-long, 30-meter-wide, and 11-
Riehen Pools, their most recent building for Ricola
meter-high monolithic walls. Layer upon layer of
is an example of their more restrained, less gran-
compacted earth create organically textured surfaces
diose architecture. This project—the largest loam
that resonate the archaic power of elemental earth.
building in Europe—is exemplary for its economy of
The joints between the huge earth blocks were
means, ecological shrewdness, and its subtle
carefully filled with earth mortar by hand, creating
reinterpretation of age-old construction methods.
softly undulating lines of loam that hold the memory
The simplicity of form and the tactility of the rammed-
of their making like a handmade pottery urn. The
earth surfaces create a rich, sensuous piece of
monumental walls radiate the fine craftsmanship and
twenty-first century architecture. It is tangible proof
the sensibility of the men and women who lovingly
that an industrial building can also be a beautiful
constructed them by hand. The rich, ochre color and
building.
clean lines of the facades create a subtle, “soft” piece of geometric architecture that sits discreetly in its rural/semi-industrial landscape and complements the building’s purpose of processing fresh alpine herbs.
60
61
62
63
64
SITE PLAN
1:1,000
65
GROUND FLOOR
1:500
66
D
C
B D
C
A
B
1ST FLOOR
67
SECTION A
1:500
68
SECTION B
SECTION C
69
SECTION D
DIENER & DIENER
Designing is about having a reaction to a place, as well as a trust in the beauty and depth of reality. Roger Diener
71
DIENER & DIENER
Many Swiss architects seem to have a deep
FORUM 3
admiration for artists and choose to collaborate with
BASEL
them in order to bring their unique artistic flair to
2005
the creation of architecture. Herzog & de Meuron has a particular penchant for joining forces with fine
As has been the case since time immemorial, archi-
artists and worked closely with Ai Weiwei on the
tecture is used to signify wealth, success, and
Olympic Stadium in Beijing. Here, Roger Diener invited
power. With their ambitious concept to create a state-
Swiss artist, Helmut Federle and Austrian architect
of-the-art research and development site, one of
Gerold Wiederin to design the highly complex glass
the leading enterprises of the healthcare industry has
facade. Their design is an ephemeral veil of glass that
slowly but surely been developing its “Campus of
dematerializes the architectural form. The elegant
Knowledge and Innovation” in Basel, building by buil-
cantilever facing the piazza that stretches the
ding over the past decades. World-class architects
full eighty-five meters across the building, further
such as David Chipperfield, Tadao Ando¯, Sanaa, Alvaro
enhances the illusion of the building hovering weight-
Siza, and Rem Koolhaas have all had their turn at
less above the site.
piecing together Vittorio Lampugnani’s master plan
The interiors of Forum 3 are no less impressive
like a giant three-dimensional puzzle. Inspired
than its artistic outer guise: the floor of the four-
by the urban layout of ancient Greek cities, a dense
meter high entrance lobby is finished in black marble
matrix of five-story building blocks define pedestrian
from Greece and is adorned with large-format
streets that open onto tree-filled piazzas. One of
abstract paintings and elegant timber furniture.
the first architectural practices to be commissioned
From within, color-filtered daubs of light spill across
to design a building on the extensive site was the
the interior surfaces, enlivening the office spaces.
Basel-based office Diener & Diener. Their Forum 3
Initially, hidden within this glazed lightbox was
building is a shimmering apparition of glass and color
a tangled jungle of massive trees that soared twelve
that mutates with the changing light and weather
meters—an idea conceived by the renowned land-
conditions, from opaque when overcast, to iridescent
scape architects, Vogt. They referred to their Raum
when sunny. No wonder it has been likened to a
für Pflanzen—or, space for plants—as a “compressed
Klee watercolor with overlapping planes of subtle,
landscape experience,” which was designed to
translucent hues. The facades are a montage of 1,200
infiltrate the building with the sheer scale, complexity,
glass panels mounted on vertical steel rods in
and rawness of nature.
twenty-one shades of color that cover a vast area of 4,300 m². It is like a gigantic art installation.
Roger Diener has created a masterful building that touches the senses and sustains a long-lasting fascination. It might only be an office building, but the marriage of architecture and fine art has elevated the design to an almost sublime level.
72
Here we could develop the design all the way into the construction phase. If there is an identity of Swiss architecture, then it can be found there. Roger Diener
73
74
75
76
SITE PLAN
1:4,000
77
1ST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR
1:400
78
SECTION
79
NICKISCH WALDER
For us, designing is to transform a vision into a singular entity which responds to all elements of architecture. A pure, specific architecture to specific circumstances. Nickisch Walder
81
NICKISCH WALDER
The delicate structures were dwarfed by the mas-
BASE CAMP MATTERHORN
sive rock face soaring above, creating an apt counter-
2014
point between the transient nature of the base camp, which was only there for a single season, and
Until the late nineteenth century the Alps were seen
the massive mountain, which remains for millennia.
as an obstacle to transport and were feared by
Although this was only a temporary solution to
anyone trying to cross them. Consequently, July 15,
accommodate alpine climbers, great care and atten-
2015 was an auspicious date being the 150th anniver-
tion was given to creating a design that did jus-
sary of the first ascent of the Matterhorn by the
tice to the dramatic majesty of the location. The archi-
British climber, Edward Whymper. This is now regarded
tects were respectful of the sensitivity of the site
as the birth of alpine tourism, which remains vital
and made sure that no trace was left of the camp once
to Switzerland’s economy. To mark the anniversary of
it had been dismantled.
Whymper’s climb, the Hörnli hut, a way-station enroute to the Matterhorn peak, was renovated. In order to cater for mountaineers during the interim period of renovation, a temporary “pop up hotel” sponsored by Swatch was erected on the slopes of the Matterhorn. It is impossible to ascend the peak from the valley in one session; mountaineers stay overnight half-way up to acclimatize and to start their hike up to the summit at daybreak. Twenty-five, tent-like structures, scattered along the alpine terrace were erected beneath the iconic peak of the Matterhorn above Zermatt ski resort. For the triangular huts, architect Selina Walder took her inspiration from the pyramidal shape of the Matterhorn that towers above the site. To reflect the transitory nature of the project, the pitched structures perch lightly on the mountain slope, like folded origami. Built from aluminum and wood, they are slightly elevated on slender, adjustable legs that allow the timber floor of the two-person huts to be horizontal and raised off the cold rocky surface, enabling climbers to sleep more comfortably. The construction is crisp and exact. Triangular doors flip open like the flap of a tent with the door handle and key slot placed diagonally. Larger huts accommodated dining and kitchen spaces where hikers were served dinner and breakfast. As water is a scarce resource on the site, no showering facilities were offered, though there was a toilet.
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
A
A
B
B
SECTION A SECTION
SECTION B
PLAN SLEEP TENT
PLAN WASH/STORAGE TENT
1:100
89
NICKISCH WALDER REFUGI LIEPTGAS FLIMS 2013
The dramatic backdrop to this holiday retreat in Graubünden is the Flimserstein cliff face that was left exposed after the largest alpine geological collapse, 10,000 years ago. The Flims valley is still littered with boulders the size of houses, debris from the mountain that fractured so long ago. Selina Walder and Georg Nickisch’s little forest hut is fascinating particularly due to the manner of its conception. What captures the imagination is how the architects have used timber from the original hut as formwork for the new building. The inner side of the old timber wall becomes the outer side of the new concrete wall, giving the concrete its scalloped edge and leaving an embossed imprint on the surface, like an inscribed memory. The chalet is situated in a cool, shaded glen in an otherwise sun-soaked plateau. It is a microclimate too damp for a timber building, but perfect for storing cheese. From a large rock in front of the entry door, there is a step up to the threshold and down again into the quiet interior of the hut. There are only two rooms, one on ground level and the other, cavelike, cut into the mountain where the old cheese store used to be. A circular oculus cut into the roof affords views of the crown of the trees above and allows light into the open plan kitchen/dining/living space on ground level. Sliced through the facade, a generous deep window is set low in the wall, visually bringing the surrounding landscape into the snug interior. The deep concrete windowsill forms a bench that extends beyond the window along the wall towards the fireplace, the focal point of the space. A narrow stairway curves down, away from the light and into the subterranean, cave-like bedroom. Inside the bedroom is a deep bath cast in concrete. Bathed in soft indirect light, the bath is wedged against massive slanted rocks giving the impression of bathing inside a secluded mountain grotto. There is a strong juxtaposition of materials: rock, concrete, glass, and water. With their starkly modern transformation, the architects have managed to avoid creating nostalgic chalet architecture. The building has the directness and the pragmatic nature of a traditional alpine chalet, but is unapologetically contemporary at the same time. One has to admire the lack of excess or pretension in this small, but powerful building.
In the moment of casting, old and new are inseparable entities. Selina Walder
90
91
92
93
94
SECTION GROUND FLOOR −1 FLOOR
1:200
95
SWISS ARCHITECTURE FROM ELSEWHERE Niall McLaughlin
96
From time to time a ripple from a smaller outpost interrupts our smooth, globalized market in architectural images. We become aware of an emerging architectural identity, which owes its nature to the specific characteristics of that region or culture. It rarely lasts long, as the identity derived from physical, economic, or social terroir quickly becomes codified into motifs and identifiable forms that are absorbed again into the mainstream. For example, the exquisite geometric nuances and inflections incubated around the Douro become ubiquitous in the suburbs of Dublin, Hackney, and Melbourne. Swiss architecture has managed to maintain a longer and broader identity than most of these regional manifestations. I am writing about it as an almost pure outsider. In other words, I know very little about the ground conditions that have generated what we might call a distinction in the work. I am looking at it as someone who regularly reads publications and occasionally visits buildings, but I don’t know about individuals, factions, dynasties, or schools within the local tradition. When I asked my colleagues in a London practice about Swiss architecture, it produced a remarkable consensus. It was seen to embody stolid, sober—almost timeless—virtues. The general sense is that the work comes from a continuity of tradition and a position of relative privilege. It is characterized by small to medium scale buildings carefully detailed from well-crafted, traditional materials, usually in cartoonishly beautiful landscapes. At its best it is refined, honest, and earthy. However, it is also seen as rigid, conservative, and sometimes sanctimonious. Someone suggested it was “joyful” but they were quickly corrected: “Yes, but it is a convent-school joy.” The prevailing opinion is that it is at the sensible end of architectural production and that it has a prevailing stoical, sachlich character. Looking at Swiss buildings in drawings and photographs and hearing Swiss architects speak about their work, there is an emphasis upon a self-evident quality. “Here it is,” they say, “I hardly need to tell you why it is so, because it must already be clear to you.” This insistence on the common-sense obviousness of the work is something that I would like to probe. Is it really so straightforward? Does it articulate its obviousness just a little too much, even to the verge of quiet hysteria? Claiming that the work is conceptually transparent, truthful, and original appears to fulfill an important need. It seems necessary to the deep social contract between the architect and the community in a society that is anxious about its relation with modernity. This appears to make it necessary to establish a connection with a primitive regional tradition of construction, but to sidestep any overt references to the modernist canon. Perhaps up to a third of the projects in this book are based upon a strategy where a primitive or notionally original building form is subjected to an unsettling transformation. An old stone hut is lined entirely on the inside with in-situ concrete; a mansion is washed in stark white, a timber log cabin is reconceived as a skeuomorph in concrete pseudo-logs; a hut is offered up on a concrete podium with a cavernous car park beneath, a mountain lodge has taut, gaping windows utterly devoid of visible framing. The skill and care involved in detailing and constructing these projects distracts us from the underlying estrangement of the conceptual strategy. The idea of the primitive, of origins, is both staged and profoundly denied at the same time. These buildings seem to embody a paradox: the requirement to dwell simply in the world and the impossibility of that way of being.
97
In other projects, the primitive type is not overtly courted, but the problematic idea of origins is played out through material estrangement. Herzog & de Meuron’s Cultural Museum in Basel refuses to settle into a stable object, it embodies an endless conceptual flipping between two possible versions of itself. The now-famous Central Signal Box in Basel both insists upon its absolute material identity and at the same time presents itself as a mirage or fugitive illusion. The most profound of these projects is, perhaps, the earliest Ricola building at Laufen (not the Ricola building published here) in which the hidden internal space is enclosed in a blind facade that speaks of nothing but the staging of its own material identity. It is silent and opaque. There is no naturalism in these projects. Any apparent reference to material or tectonic stability is immediately undermined by a contrary estrangement. For me, this collection of projects brings to mind a number of associations. The first is Semper’s famous footnote in Style, which refers to Hamlet’s question “What was Hecuba to him?” It suggests to me the impossibility of conceptual transparency and the victory of representation over notions of literal truth—“to mask the material of the mask.” The next is Aldo Rossi’s drawing and writing and the melancholy that comes from the impasse at the center of his work. The last is the tradition of Robert Smithson and, in particular, the framing and deracination of materials, their simultaneous exposure and estrangement, like butterflies pinned in a glass. All of these associations have a tragic quality, based upon the need for, and impossibility of, a form of living rooted in origins. It is this that I think gives Swiss architecture its seriousness and perhaps its endurance. I recently attended a lecture by Peter Zumthor in London. I had just spent the day at Worcester College in Oxford reading Nicholas Hawksmoor’s description of his library building there. It was apparent that Hawksmoor rested his authority for the work on painstakingly enumerating the precedents he was employing in this building. In contrast, Zumthor mentioned no other architect in his description of his work, to the extent that he would not answer questions about precedents after the talk. His presentation of his own authority seemed to derive from his silence, perhaps insisting upon the origin of his ideas in his own experience. This emphasis upon primitive original experience appears at the heart of the identity of Swiss architecture today. It allows the work to offer itself up as a resistance to the global market in architectural images, to the endless leveling brought about by visual exchange without lived experience. But the recourse to origins is also a difficult strategy with its own problems. The ground of origin, in materials, in experience, in typology, is less stable than we think. This uncertainty haunts Swiss practice. It is intensely inventive, but it leaves the work, for better or worse, in a state of isolation.
98
GION A. CAMINADA
One of the great challenges for me lies in building houses that have a lasting—ideally almost an “absolute”—validity. Gion A. Caminada
99
Sturdy timber columns create a rhythmic pro-
GION A. CAMINADA FOREST HUT
gression of space and articulate the interior. The
DOMAT/ EMS
fragrance of roughly sawn stone pine adds a special
2014
scented quality to the experience of being present in the space, linking the building to its context on
Nestled in a clearing in a forest in the far east of
a subliminal level. The sense of being in the forest
Switzerland is the Tegia da vaut or forest cabin.
is encapsulated in the interior. There is no doubt that
The building was a gift to the commune Domat /Ems
this Waldhütte has become an integral part of
and accommodates a forest classroom for school
the secluded forest landscape where it now belongs.
children or for adults studying forestry, while private individuals can also rent the space for functions. Gion A. Caminada, the renowned Swiss architect who designed the cabin, believes in the importance of building projects in close proximity to his community with materials and skills drawn from the locality. Caminada champions traditional techniques and local craftsmanship and the great care and effort that are taken to realize his buildings is reflected in the high quality of his architecture. Taking local vernacular architecture as his point of departure, Caminada grounds his buildings in their particular topography and in the fine-grained specificity of the local context. Although most of Caminada’s projects are small-scale and are located in rural villages in the Alps, like Vrin, Valendas, or Ems, his work is nonetheless well-known throughout Switzerland and internationally. This might not be a large building, but it nevertheless exudes a strong presence among the towering dark green pines. It is a delicately layered building, laid gently in its wooded site. The beautiful gesture of the concave, wing-like roof and the facades that curve outwards to meet the eaves, in combination with the layered texture of the shingle facades, create the primary elements of the cabin. The timber cladding stops just short of the ground creating a delicate shadow gap and an impression of levitation, as if the building were suspended. Caminada’s choice of materials is clear: a timber structure surrounded by trees. Concrete steps projecting beyond the footprint of the cabin anchor the building and denote the entry, while on the far side a raised outdoor timber terrace creates a threshold to the forest that “balances nature and culture.”
Ambivalent spaces for the ordinary and the everyday, which at the same time refer to something absent, are the high art of architecture. Gion A. Caminada
100
101
102
B
A
A
SECTION B GROUND FLOOR
1:200
103
B
SECTION A
Reuss Delta viewing tower typifies Caminada’s
GION A. CAMINADA VIEWING TOWER
sensibility to material and structure. Like Peter
REUSS DELTA, LAKE LUCERNE
Zumthor, Caminada hails from Graubünden and, like Zumthor, is a trained carpenter and cabinet-maker.
2012
The manner in which his buildings are crafted reflects Reuss Delta, in the heart of Switzerland, is nestled
his intimate knowledge of materials and their
between high, snow-capped Alps and the flat
assembly. With its reduced material palette of locally
green valley that opens out towards Lake Lucerne,
sourced timber and woven willow, like his forest
where river, shore, and lake slowly merge in mini
hut, the tower celebrates local skills and craftsman-
fjords and idyllic bathing islands. A few decades ago,
ship. Forty-eight silver-fir tree trunks—each
the future of the delta looked precarious as the
chosen and felled by local foresters and debarked by
shoreline was gradually disappearing into the lake.
hand—form a conical tower crowned by a light,
It was the 1985 Reuss Delta Law that secured the
scallop-edged roof. A spiral staircase swirls its way
site, which has subsequently become a haven for
around the central trunk branching out from a
shallow water wildlife and plants, as well as a leisure
platform into four projecting viewing balconies facing
attraction. The small archipelago was created with
the four compass points. The higher one ascends,
3.3 million tons of rock excavated from the Gotthard
the denser the weaving becomes, until one is almost
Base Tunnel. The massive flat rocks brought from
enclosed in fine interwoven twigs. Structurally,
the tunnel excavation are ideal for sunbathing and
both platform and stairs are hung from above by steel
relaxing. The only human-made structure on the
rods suspended from the roof. The ceiling is com-
delta is the eleven-meter-high viewing tower that
posed of pleated panels of woven reeds fanning out
creates a vantage point from which to observe
from the central timber support, overlaid with
the varied bird life and enjoy the surrounding natural
a whimsical tangle of twigs that soften the pattern
beauty of the mountains cascading into the lake
creating an unstructured, filigree layer. The woven
waters.
balustrades of the balconies are reminiscent of the baskets of hot-air balloons. At this elevated viewpoint observing the bird life, one feels like a bird perched high in a nest. Despite its strict symmetry, the structure retains a sense of delicacy and sensuousness. During the bare winter months, when the reeds are ochre-colored, the golden tones of the timber tower are intricately tied to its site and seem to emerge from the sweeping surrounding landscape. Caminada has created a clearly rational, though poetic construction where each element is integral to the other, each individual part only able to function with the support of the other to create a harmonious, unified whole.
A clever design generally combines rationality and emotionality; that is intellect and feeling. Gion A. Caminada
104
105
106
107
108
109
ELEVATION
1:100
110
VIEWING PLATFORM GROUND FLOOR
111
JÜRG CONZETT
Structural engineering is one of the most interesting occupations of human beings. Jürg Conzett
113
JÜRG CONZETT
a stairway suspended fifty meters above the valley
TRAVERSINA FOOTBRIDGE 2
floor. The new bridge is fifty-seven meters long,
VIAMALA
weighs around two hundred tons, and is made with
2005
pre-tensile steel cables. The primary cable, lateral diagonal rods, and larch wood walkway were con-
One could argue that in Switzerland the father of
structed in situ in an extraordinarily dramatic and
architecture is engineering, as the discipline grew out
hazardous manner suspended above the vertiginous
of the necessity to overcome the treacherous topog-
chasm. In a benevolent design gesture for those
raphy. Over the centuries intricate networks of
who suffer from vertigo, direct views down into the
bridges and tunnels have been built across the country
valley are averted by a layer of ten parallel glulam
like a complex web allowing the safe passage of
girders beneath the stepped walkway. These also in-
people and goods from north to south and from east
crease rigidity so that when one ascends the 176
to west, connecting even the most remote valleys
steps, the bridge barely wavers. Nevertheless, walk-
to urban centers. Engineering is simply omnipresent
ing gingerly across the valley is not for the faint
in Switzerland. The creation of man-made struc-
hearted, as one feels rather like a circus trapeze artist
tures in the daunting alpine landscape has no doubt
teetering across the ravine.
profoundly influenced the production and design
Conzett’s second Traversina footbridge is a re-
of architecture, both historically and currently. This
markable piece of engineering where design and
homage to Swiss architecture would not be complete
construction are taken to their limits. When mathe-
without showcasing one of the myriad engineering
matics and art unite in harmony, like in a Bach
feats accomplished by Swiss engineers.
fugue, something of profound beauty is created. As in
As its Latin name implies, the Viamala route
Zumthor’s fine, leaf-shaped roof at St Benedict
in the legendary ravine near Davos in Graubünden was
Chapel, Conzett’s bridge is reminiscent of the beauti-
originally regarded as being dangerous and malev-
ful mathematical structures one sees in nature:
olent. Previously, the idea was to pass through
the delicate form of a leaf, the arc of a shell, or the
the ravine as quickly as possible and to emerge safely.
slow curve of a crescent dune. A design that has
Today there is still a residual mystery in the Viamala
clear associations with patterns in nature, especially
Gorge and an allure to the raw beauty of its land-
when set in natural surroundings, is anchored
scape. Over the years it has become a popular desti-
deeply into its environment. Traversina footbridge is
nation for tourists and hikers from far and wide.
such a feat of engineering design and construction.
As part of an open-air eco-museum in the valley and
Suspended gracefully in its sheer craggy setting,
to connect two fragments of an ancient Roman trail,
both its delicacy and precision are truly admirable.
the gorge had to be traversed and the ravine bridged.
It is just one example of a myriad of superbly
Jürg Conzett, the renowned Chur-based engineer,
designed bridges that connect valleys throughout
who has worked for many prominent Swiss architects,
the country.
designed the initial Traversina footbridge, which was unfortunately destroyed by an intense spring storm in 1999. A new bridge was planned and Conzett, together with his colleague Rolf Bachofner, was commissioned once again to “bridge with gap.” It was decided to move the new bridge to a less exposed site further up the gorge. Many obstacles typical to alpine structures had to be overcome to build the bridge: a remote, inaccessible site, a tight budget, and a short construction period. An added challenge was how to overcome the obstacle of having to span the width of gorge, while connecting the twentyfive meter height difference from one side of the gorge, forty meters across to the other. Conzett chose to design a suspension bridge, or to be more precise:
114
115
116
SECTION
1:20
117
EAST ELEVATION
1:300
118
119
PETER ZUMTHOR
In a society that celebrates the inessential, architecture can put up a resistance, counteract the waste of forms and meanings, and speak its own language. Peter Zumthor
121
PETER ZUMTHOR ST BENEDICT CHAPEL SUMVITG 1985 –1988
Caplutta Sogn Benedetg, or St Benedict Chapel, was built to replace the former Baroque chapel that was crushed by an avalanche in 1984. A new site, protected by the forest above, was chosen on an old mountain trail above the hamlet, Sumvitg. The chapel’s curved walls enclose a single volume, shaped in plan like a leaf, an eye, or a boat. This form is extruded upwards and crowned by a band of clerestory lights that illuminate the chapel from above revealing the sky. Sheathed in larch wood shingles, the surface texture is reminiscent of the shimmering colors of Byzantine mosaics. There is a subtle gradation of color as the shingles turn from silver to golden as the facade curves away from the direct rays of sun. Like a face that ages gracefully over a lifetime, the chapel shows the weathering effects of time on its textured skin. Entering the chapel at an oblique angle to the main body of the building, the space abruptly expands vertically upwards. Tall, slender timber columns rise through the space and converge with ribs of timber beams on the ceiling. The timber structure is separated from the cladding by a few centimeters, creating a tension between the two and an interplay of shadows. Like a spine with structural ribs, the roof ridge gently curves over the space, enfolding it. In effect the chapel is held by three curved planes supported by timber supports, like a skeleton that gives form to the body of the building. These timber columns enable one to read the flow of structural forces bearing the weight of the roof. The lack of any eye-level window openings allows no view to distract, only the slow movement of a bow of sunshine across the wall as the day progresses. Standing inside the chapel feels like being on the inside of a musical instrument; there is a vague expectation of sound. St Benedict epitomizes Zumthor’s quiet architecture; it is discreet, but powerful. The alpine chapel communicates simple faith stripped of luxury or opulence.
122
It is only between the reality of things and the imagination that the spark of the work of art is kindled. Peter Zumthor
123
124
125
B
A
A
B
SECTION A GROUND FLOOR
1:100
126
SECTION B
127
Zumthor’s architecture celebrates the sensuous
PETER ZUMTHOR THERMAL BATHS
experience of bathing. The exhilarating shock
VALS
of plunging into cold 14 °C water directly after dipping
1990 –1996
into almost unbearably hot 42 °C makes one’s body glow, while floating outdoors in 36 °C water when
Rituals of bathing and cleansing have been part of
it’s snowing is an invigorating experience. To enter the
human civilization for millennia. In Istanbul and
sound bath you have to swim through a narrow
Budapest, Rome and Bath the ritual of bathing has
passageway into a vertical, water-filled space where
been central to social culture since ancient times.
the ceiling soars six meters above. Lit from beneath,
Peter Zumthor’s thermal baths in Vals rekindle the
the grotto is an acoustic chamber where bathers tread
“high architecture” of ancient baths and the splendid
water while humming, listening to the overlay of
buildings housing them that are a testament to
reverberating voices. In the small, enclosed, intimate
their historic importance. Using natural resources
pools Zumthor has managed to recreate the impres-
at his disposal in the alpine valley: gneiss and
sion of being in a secret coastal cave distant from the
water, Zumthor has hewn an evocative sequence of
mundane routine of everyday life, while conversely
spaces from layer upon precise layer of solid rock.
the main pools open to the landscape and are soaked
The building is cut deep into the mountain, rock
in daylight. The palette of materials—clear water,
embedded onto rock, built up in slender horizontal
polished stone, brass, chrome, leather, and velvet—
strata of Valser quartz. Deeply rooted into the
are combined with a remarkable sophistication,
mountain slope, the building literally emerges from
choreographed to enhance the essential, evocative
its own geology.
qualities of each material. The touch, smell, and
Pools of clear alpine water from deep beneath the earth are held between massive stone walls. Nothing is revealed immediately, rather it is as
sound of these materials make bathing there both a highly sensory and highly aesthetic experience. The theatricality of steaming water held in stone
you wander through the myriad of concealed spaces
is heightened by the intense modeling of light and
that you discover the building. “The meander,”
shadow. There are spaces shrouded in misty shadows
as Zumthor calls it, “is a designed negative space
and somber corners contrasted with light-flooded
between the blocks, a space that connects every-
sunny areas where you can recline and enjoy the
thing as it flows throughout the entire building.”
enormous, framed alpine views. Natural light filters
He compares exploring the complex layout of spaces
from above through long fissures between the roof
and pools to ambling through a woodland of trees,
slabs, brushing along dark stone walls, while chinks
“Like walking in a forest without a path. A feeling of
of blue light filter down onto blue water. Being in
freedom, the pleasure of discovery.”
Vals makes you acutely aware that to create architecture is to define the dimensions and enclosure of space. Through his relentless exploitation of the inherent qualities of his chosen materials, the modeling of space and the modulation of light, Zumthor has managed to elevate the simple act of bathing to an almost mystical experience.
Mountain, stone, water—building in the stone, building with the stone, into the mountain, building out of the mountain, being inside the mountain—how can the implications and the sensuality of the association of these words be interpreted architecturally? Peter Zumthor
128
129
130
131
132
A A
B
BATHING FLOOR
1:350
133
SECTION A SECTION B
1:350
134
TALKING TO PETER ZUMTHOR ARCHITECT AS AUTHOR
Peter Zumthor starts his book Thinking Architecture by stating that when he thinks about architecture, images arise within him and by drawing on intuition, memories, and free associations combined with systematic and rational thinking he develops a design. It is perhaps this seamless interplay of intuitive feeling and rational understanding that enables him to raise ordinary buildings to the extraordinary. In his book, Zumthor expresses his motivation to design buildings that arouse emotions and understanding and that have a particular presence and sense of belonging. “To me, buildings can have a beautiful silence that I associate with attributes such as composure, self-evidence, durability, presence, and integrity, and with warmth and sensuousness as well; a building that is being itself, being a building, not representing anything, just being.” In Thinking Architecture Zumthor explores our relationship to nature and the profound emotions it can evoke within us, “The beauty of nature moves something great in us.” Though we might not understand it, we sense our part in nature; we come from it and return to it. One senses this awe and admiration for nature in his work. “When I concentrate on a specific site or place for which I am going to design a building, when I try to plumb its depths, its form, its history, and its sensuous qualities, images of other places start to invade this process of precise observation: images of places I know and that once impressed me, images of ordinary or special places that I carry with me as inner visions of specific moods and qualities; images of architectural situations, which emanate from the world of art, or films, theater or literature.” This sensitivity of how architecture relates to its particular context and landscape is part of what gives his work great strength. As an architect Zumthor is interested in how one experiences a building; the fall of light on a surface, the shape of a door handle, the sound of a voice in a high room, the atmosphere of a space. Whether chapel, museum, or house, his buildings allow the essential ingredients of architecture to resonate. Like a beautiful piece of music or a painted masterpiece, his buildings capture moods and stir emotions. With his ingenious use of materials, Zumthor has been called a shaman and a mystic of his craft. He writes that it is not the materials themselves that are poetic, but the manner of their combination and their form that elevates them. “The sense that I try to instill into materials is beyond all rules of composition, and their tangibility, smell, and acoustic qualities are merely elements of the language we are obliged to use. Sense emerges when I succeed in bringing out the specific meanings of certain materials in my buildings, meanings that can only be perceived in just this way in this one building.” Zumthor’s work is restrained but powerful, both precise and sensuous. His architecture manages to reach the “hard core of beauty” he writes so poetically about.
135
Anna Roos (AR): This
publication is about the sensibility of Swiss architects
and the culture of architecture in Switzerland. I see this as a country that upholds and values the tradition of architecture, one could argue, to a greater degree than elsewhere. This is not about promoting a brand, not a white cross on a red background, but about a broad approach to a discipline. I’d like to explore what’s happening here. In this interview I would like to discuss how you perceive the unique place that Switzerland holds in the sphere of architecture internationally and explore your role in this context. How this rich architectural tradition has evolved historically. In some countries architects do not have a good reputation and laypeople like to criticize architects. I get the impression that their role is taken less seriously than here in Switzerland. Do you also get the impression that architects are generally held in higher esteem in Switzerland than elsewhere? Peter Zumthor (PZ): The profession of an architect is held in high esteem as a title in Italy, where
every architect is called a “doctor.” Switzerland has a different approach. Long ago architects used to have a good reputation here. As a child I remember my father talking respectfully about architects. He differentiated between architects who were draftsmen or “architect” architects; those who really studied architecture. He made a distinction and had a greater respect for trained architects. So he’d often say, “That is not an architect,” because in Switzerland anyone can call themselves an architect. Then during the 1960s and 1970s there was a building boom and architecture and architects in Switzerland lost their good reputation. It was sort of like “building as destroying.” There was a famous publication by an architect at that time, Rolf Keller Bauen als Umweltzerstörung (Building as Environmental Destruction). Then in the late 1970s and the beginning of the 1980s we had to consciously rebuild the reputation of the architect. I was involved with this here in Graubünden. We looked into “responsibility” through organizations like the Schweizerische Werkbund (Swiss Guild), and the Schweizer Heimatschutz (Swiss Heritage Association). We showed ourselves as being responsible for our environment and also being respectful of the past. And so we had to rebuild the reputation of the architect. AR: PZ: Yes, it
And that was evidently successful?
took some fifteen to twenty years. I initiated a prize for good building and other
initiatives like that. It took some time. I think architects are respected quite well now. AR: PZ: This
Do you think more than elsewhere?
is hard for me to say. AR: There is bold use of materials in many buildings in Switzerland, particularly
of concrete, stone, and wood, historically due to the lack of natural resources like iron. This tradition has continued to the present day. What role do you think this palette of materials and the sensitivity to materials has played in the making of architecture in this country? PZ:
I can only answer this question on a personal basis, not in a generalized way. Since I am
not so interested in the topic of architecture or the idea of Swiss architecture. I start with a place, I look around. I see mountains, I see a desert. I think of the atmosphere of my not-yet existing building, I imagine how people will use it, experience it. What can I do? What is the specific energy of materials I should use so that they will love it. So as you can see I am extremely interested in generating the right mood with the materials I pick and maybe the only Swiss thing I can see in this process is me, myself being Swiss.
136
AR:
It seems to me as if the relationship that many Swiss architects have to
their landscape and their sensitivity to the varied historic traditions of architecture informs their work even today. Pretty much wherever one is in Switzerland, the landscape is present: a river, forest, mountain, or lake. We know that Swiss architects are very much guided by the constraints and challenges of the landscape. How does this interaction take place in your work? PZ: This
is a basic in my work. I want to make things that are good for the place and good for
its use. I like to study the place, whether it is at a low or a high altitude, whether it’s in Switzerland or somewhere else. AR:
How do you go about studying the place, do you photograph and sketch,
go there many times at different times of the day and different seasons. How do you record your building sites? PZ:
It differs; I have to get a feeling for the place. AR:
Do you return to the site many times before you start your design process
and put pen to paper? PZ:
Sometimes I have a feeling right away, then I don’t have to go back. AR:
PZ: Yes. Usually
Like when you meet a person for the first time?
I don’t find it so difficult to get a feeling in L. A. or Norway, or wherever.
To see, and to react to what’s there. Sometimes I need to know more. AR: PZ: Yes, it’s
Do you record it here primarily in your head?
not so much about a scientific analysis. This could be interesting, but basically
it’s reacting to what’s there. You open up your heart and your eyes and then you can see. AR:
I have read in an interview you saying that landscape and garden grow ever
more into the interior of your designs. Has the natural surrounding become more important to you during the course of your career or has it always been so? PZ:
It has always been important to me, but its consciously becoming more and more
important. You can see this in all my works—in large-scale projects and in small-scale architecture and landscape. Yes, this is so in all of my projects, there is a kind of a garden or landscape as an integral part of the architecture. AR:
I like the idea of the garden encroaching into the interior. How would you
do this in an urban context, in Los Angeles (LACMA) for instance? PZ: The
Los Angeles County Museum of Art is located in Hancock Park or what’s left of it,
because in the second half of the twentieth century several buildings where placed in the park, taking away large pieces of it. One of the key elements of my new design is to reestablish the horizontal flow of the park by elevating the museum. Glass pavilions responding to the park and the Wilshire Boulevard generate a largely permeable ground floor below the hovering main mass of the museum. But there is more to the landscape of the place. It is an ancient landscape. Tar has surfaced and has formed pits of tar, which became traps for animals 40,000 years ago. The oil rose to the surface of these pits. The animals of the time got trapped, so now when you dig you will find layers and layers of fossils from the tar in the lakes. Fossils of mammoths and saber-tooth tigers. There is a Walt Disney kind of character in the way the tar pits address the public at the moment. I hope that with the shape, placement, and the dark material of my building I can provoke a deeper feeling for this specific place.
137
AR: You
have been working on LACMA in Los Angeles, and the House on a Hill in
Devon and, I remember last time I was here you were working on an enormous wax model of a museum on a river somewhere in Russia. I also saw huge models of an ensemble of buildings for a zinc mine museum in the mountains of Norway. Some of your most well-known buildings are in neighboring Germany. There does not seem to be anything fundamentally different about your international work. As a Swiss person, do you feel that you have the same freedom to do your work abroad as you do here? PZ: The
conditions always change from country to country. I always have to study them:
Who is the client? What’s the place? What kind of society is there? How does the building code work? Are there good craftspeople and where are they? How is the building process organized? And so on. This is always different; I study this, whether in L. A., in Norway, or in South Korea. It takes a lot of time, but it’s very important to study the specific conditions. In South Korea, where I have started a project—a teahouse—I have a lot of trust and confidence around me. It’s the same thing in L. A. and now I also know where the good craftsmen are and how I would like to organize the whole project. But basically this is similar in Switzerland. This probably has more to do with my standing. But the conditions are always different, for instance, in England they have little experience in working with concrete so they cannot do certain things. Sometimes regulations don’t make sense but you have to cope with them, like in Germany where there are a lot of regulations; and Austria has even more regulations than Switzerland. Each country has its own complexities that one needs to understand. AR:
Your work seems so strongly rooted to this landscape. How do you approach
a project and how do you react to a landscape where you don’t have a historic relationship or personal memories? PZ: You
could put it this way: we all come from somewhere. We all come from a home.
You come from a home and I come from a home, that’s where we all start. But then we go to other places and have new experiences. I’m rooted here and it’s good that I’m rooted here, because it makes me able to see the differences between places and to react to them. So this juxtaposition goes well together, the “personal” and the “foreign.” AR:
In your selection of images in the book The Images of Architects you chose
images of two Islamic buildings, Hagia Sophia and the Red Fort in Delhi as images that inspire you. In what way are you able to draw inspiration for your work from different cultures in distant places? For example when you travel to similar sites; do you sketch them and study them? PZ:
Wherever I go I’m interested in everything I see—on an intellectual level, or as a pure
experience of landscape, or of different cultures. It is always interesting to understand, but first of all it is important to simply look and see. First I ask myself, “How does this work? What is this?” I’m continuously influenced by everything I see and experience. Like everybody else, you live and you see things and then, when you face a problem there is a huge storage of images in your mind. Most of the time you don’t even know where they come from but they are there. AR: Yes, I
think as an architect wherever one travels one is aware one’s looking
and observing. PZ:
138
Probably also as a writer one does this, a lot of people look very carefully, artists too.
AR: Today
there is often a strong focus on image; this has also affected
architecture. Buildings have become brand objects and some architects have their signature style. In contrast to this many architects here are driven by a historic tradition of local materials and craftsmanship; a kind of “slow architecture.” In an interview you once said that you don’t want to be seen as a brand architect. Refusing to be trapped into a brand I’m sure allows you a kind of freedom. When presented with a big international commission like LACMA, how have you managed to remain free from this “branding”? PZ:
I always work like that whether it’s a large-scale project like LACMA or a small project in
a neighboring village. I probably work more like an artist. I have a project and then I look and I start to come up with something which I think makes sense, so if the image gets in my way I have to fight it. Or, in the worst case, I say, “I cannot work for you.” Because if it’s only about the name and the image, then I can’t continue. So I have to find out early on whether my clients are sincere. AR:
Has that happened before that you’ve had to withdraw?
PZ: Yes, it has happened a couple of times. I’ve had to think, “Okay, if it’s more about the image
then I won’t do it,” because I always want to create the whole building. I can see that big architectural firms do a lot of more-or-less commercial work. In some offices nobody makes a drawing any more. I think that’s another way of working, maybe it’s also another way of making money, but I’m not like that. I am interested in the kind of work which keeps me going. I work more like an author. AR: To
me it is telling that rather than being lured by the bright lights of the big
city, you have chosen to remain in Haldenstein. Clearly you are not seduced by the celebrity circuit, but are more interested in continuing your pursuit of architecture here in this small village. Does this tie into a pursuit to remain somehow free? PZ:
I’m here in this place because I found my wife here and we wanted to stay here. We have
people working here from twelve different nations at the moment. In this mundane place I can ask, “How is it in Lebanon? How is it in England? How is it in Poland?” So spiritually we are actually part of the world but we happen to work here, it’s accidental. I think this turned out to be a really beautiful place to live and work. Maybe this is the best thing that could have happened to me. If you’d have asked me thirty years ago, “Would you like to create a big office and work around the whole world; become a Pritzker Prize winner and work in Haldenstein,” then I would have said, maybe that’s a contradiction. But I never had these ideas, it just happened to me. In my life the best things happen without premeditation. I’m glad I didn’t get many of the things I wanted. I found that out later in life. AR: Your
path to becoming an architect has not been a classical one. During
the 1960s and 1970s, you went from carpentry to furniture design, industrial design to interior design, and then eventually progressed to architecture. Do you think this unconventional path might have also liberated you in a way allowing you to create your own authentic position? PZ: Looking back I think its suits me well. Let’s say I learned how to make things in my father’s
workshop for four years. Then I learned about history and art history, and the history of buildings from working for the Department for the Preservation of Monuments in Graubünden. Before this, I had an extremely good year doing a course at the Kunstgewerbeschule (Arts and Craft School) in Basel. I didn’t realize at the time how important this would be later on. The teachers there taught us the crafts of how to draw, how to paint, and how to watercolor. You need these skills as an architect I would say. The Vorkurs, as the name says, came from the Bauhaus. They still teach these skills today, but now it’s more intellectual maybe. At that time it was completely focused on learning skills. These skills are scarce today. I use them everyday, and I can see how my young architects often make drawings that are not in proportion; they sometimes lack these skills… But that was a wonderful year, making and learning these artistic skills. The rest is personal looking and feeling.
139
AR: Yes, certainly
one feels this in your work, the fact that you’ve had an inti-
mate knowledge of how things are put together. Because, especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, architecture is approached as an academic subject, and architects often don’t know how to put materials together. PZ: Yes, only
the surface is treated and someone else puts it together. No, here in Haldenstein
I teach my people to come from the inside out, not only in the buildings, but also in the real materialization and construction, from the inside out. We know how to construct. AR: You
might work in this small village in Graubünden but you are certainly an
inspiration to architects all over the world. You are a testament to the fact that it is possible to remain true to your concept. But some say, “Yes but that’s Zumthor,” you belong in your own category. For “normal” architects this level is nigh impossible to achieve. Do you also see this as a privileged position or do you see it purely as a matter of principle? PZ:
I can only do the best, which comes to my mind faced with the work I do; my work. I can
only say to myself, “This is the best I can do, I am satisfied with this now. This is it.” So you can call this “non-compromising,” but it’s actually a result of a process, it’s not a decision not to make compromises. If you write a book, or if you compose a piano piece then this matter of compromise in an artistic work is not so curious. I work mainly as an author. I’m an architect as an author, so I work in a similar way as an artist would work, and an artist has to follow his personal truth. I want to do something which works well and which fits to the place; as if it were for myself. I have to be excited about it. The building has to fit to the place; it has to fit to its use. I write a building like a piece of music, like you would write a book, or write a poem and then this is just how it has to be. To create my architecture I also have to work together with many people. And of course the client is very important. AR:
It’s difficult because there are so many people involved, authorship is
maybe more difficult when creating a piece of architecture. PZ: The
difference is, I’m a conductor and composer with a big orchestra on site. And then
there’s also the client who comes and says, “No, don’t play this.” So the client and I, we have to understand each other: If the client is not interested in my ideas then I can’t work with him, but if the client says, “I’m interested in the way that you work. Can you make a composition for me? I wouldn’t know how to compose it, but see this is the task,” then I’m okay. I always do the best I can, as if it were for myself. AR:
It seems as though you don’t overtly reference other buildings, or if at
all tangentially. You spent a decade working in the heritage department here in Chur. Did you find that experience has had a specific influence on your work? PZ:
It’s part of my “off-center” kind of architecture education, this is what I was mentioning
before. I studied let’s say around 5,000 old farmhouses trying to understand how they were built and constructed, how old they were and how they came together as buildings. We made drawings and inventories and so on. There were farmhouses as well as some “higher architecture”—though all alpine architecture. I did this for eight to ten years. I learned a lot technically and historically, and also about the development of architecture and about vernacular architecture in this region. There were some traces of well-known artists who came into the village to work as well, so you could see the vernacular and the stylish juxtaposed—you could see a merging of the two. This was a great time for me.
140
AR: The
chapter title “The Hard Core of Beauty” ¹ in your book Thinking Archi
tecture is evocative. The concentrated substance of a building that imbues beauty. I can imagine that you don’t set out overtly to create something beautiful, but that it is something that happens when all the thousands of decisions that you make combine in an entirety. “Does beauty have a form?” I realize it’s a big topic, but can you elaborate on that? PZ:
Beauty is something very personal, the experience of beauty doesn’t happen so often.
It has to do with a chemical, emotional reaction in your body where all of a sudden you find something to be beautiful. There’s this argument that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder, which is true for me. But not every object stirs this emotion of beauty, obviously it needs something on the other side. Like, for example, if you fall in love with a woman, it needs something else opposite to set up something beautiful. So that’s what I do: I create these objects and hope that they might be a beautiful object for users and others. I’m sure you also know that if you want to reach this ideal, it probably has to ring true in a way. I think if you don’t want artificial beauty, there is a more essential beauty. I came to realize that I probably do have the talent to create beautiful space, and form, and balance, where everything starts to come together. I can see that for some people this is difficult, because they look and say, “Oh how can you do this?” I guess there is a sensitivity and talent I have. Of course I’m not the only one, many people have this. You also have to accept that it’s a beautiful human capacity. There are even more beautiful talents than I have. There are great people like Mozart and Bach, they had a talent which is unbelievable. This is the greatness of human beings that every once in a while there are incredible talents that you can hardly explain. I’m not putting myself on that level. I respect that some things don’t come from me, they don’t come from work—they come from nature. ¹ From a poem by the American poet William Carlos Williams
141
SAVIOZ FABRIZZI
Our approach to architecture seeks balance between spatiality and the expression of materials in order to reveal the intrinsic qualities of a site and built heritage. Savioz Fabrizzi
143
SAVIOZ FABRIZZI
Access to the main room on the upper level is via
MAISON BOISSET
a steep staircase, like a tree-house ladder. Monastic
LE BIOLLEY
in its simplicity, the only furniture is the double
2012
bed and a cupboard, also crafted from larch wood. The pitched roof is expressed in the interior of the
A significant proportion of architecture in Switzerland
bedroom; the original crossbeam at the apex disrupts
consists of renovating old rural buildings and farm-
the uniformity of the surfaces and is a reminder
houses. Casa d’Estate by Buchner Bründler is an
that this structure dates back over a century. A strip
example in Ticino, while Maison Boisset is an example
of light filters into the space through an elongated
in the French-speaking canton, Valais. The project
opening that corresponds to the eye level of someone
brief for Sion-based architects, Savioz Fabrizzi was to
seated in the bed, while a glazed door opens onto
convert an old, triple-story barn into a contemporary
the L-shaped balcony from where one can enjoy the
holiday house. The building is situated in Le Boilley,
spectacular aerial views of the alpine landscape.
a village high in the Alps near Martigny. Typical of
There is a bunkroom on the lower level with en-suite
local vernacular architecture, the barn is comprised
bathroom, also fully clad in larch wood. A glass
of timber-board construction supported above
door replaced the old cattle grate to allow light and
the ground by a stone base to protect the timber from
access from the children’s room to the exterior.
snow and to insulate the house from the icy winters.
The crisp, clean timber finishes impart the interiors
The building is perched vertiginously above the valley,
with a flavor of traditional Japanese architecture.
the elevation affording panoramic vistas. From
The steep incline of the site affords the building
the exterior, the sharp, glazed front door flush with
direct access to the outside on two levels: both the
the stonework is the only hint of the sleek interior
kitchen level and the lower level.
transformation. The house consists of three, sixteen-meter-square
Thanks to clever planning and fine detailing, Savioz Fabrizzi has managed to create a spacious
spaces on three levels: the kitchen/dining area
feeling, even though the entire house is merely forty-
is sandwiched between two bedrooms, one above for
eight square meters. The rustic stone and raw
adults and the other below for children. The entry
timber exterior is juxtaposed by the delicate, smooth
cuts through massive stone walls, allowing access
surfaces of the interior spaces. This powerful
into the kitchen-dining space which is clad in honey-
contrast of old and new builds up tension. It is this
colored larch panels. Within the compact space all
dichotomy that gives the project its strength.
fittings are meticulously crafted, creating a cabin-like atmosphere. In order to mitigate the small-scale dimensions, Savioz Fabrizzi had to plan the rooms with the utmost care in order to utilize every inch of space. Thus, the windowsill doubles as a seating bench that turns the corner around the dining table, while the full height of the rooms is used for cupboard space. The kitchen unit is tucked into a wall niche and is perfectly aligned with the window opening. The frame of the window is carefully concealed behind the cladding, thereby emphasizing the landscape and drawing nature into the building. Thanks to the almost zen-like reduction of the interiors, the eye is left undistracted, allowing one to fully enjoy the breathtaking views stretched across the valley below.
144
145
146
147
148
149
SITE PLAN
SECTION
1:1,000
1:100
150
1ST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR −1FLOOR
1:100
151
SAVIOZ FABRIZZI
The building is organized on three, staggered
MAISON RODUIT
levels on an L-shaped plan with the kitchen positioned
CHAMOSON
at its heart. Three interior floor levels are reflected
2005
on the exterior by three pitched roofs that build up to a climax at the intersection of the two wings where
As with other projects showcased in this publication,
the house reaches its highest level, while the pointed
the landscape plays an integral role in the archi-
gabled roofs echo the serrated peaks soaring
tecture. Maison Roduit cannot be disconnected from
above. The highest level culminates in the main bed-
the drama of the jagged mountains looming in the
room with its own en-suite bathroom and walk-in
background; indeed the house seems to emerge
cupboard. A corner of the room is cut away to create
directly from its geology and has an intense sense of
a gallery that looks down into the double-volume
belonging to the site. Laurent Savioz was commis-
kitchen area below, enabling the three-dimensionality
sioned by local artists to revitalize the old, rural
of the house to be perceived. Like a pinwheel, the
farmhouse in Chamoson that had been neglected and
kitchen extends to the living room on the south, and
had fallen into disrepair. The renovation is the latest
the atelier to the west. The robust use of materials
in a long history of construction on the building
on the exterior is continued in the interiors,
dating back to 1814. Rather than simply gutting the
which are formed from unrefined mineral materials:
house, the architects salvaged and upgraded the
natural stone, exposed concrete, and polished
dilapidated structure. The exterior volume has been
screed floors. Thus the materialization of the building
retained and the stone facades preserved wherever
both inside and out is sustained with the same
possible.
confidence and rigor.
What is most striking is the rustic stonework
The former window apertures have been retained,
of the building and the lively interplay of textured sur-
while a few larger openings were added to allow
faces. The architects sought to reinforce the strong
natural light and to open the interior spaces to
mineral character and emphasize the stonework
the breathtaking landscape. In order to minimize the
by replacing sections of the building previously made
impact of the new openings on the volume of the
of timber weatherboarding with solid concrete. Thus
house and to utilize the substantial thickness of
the massive, rough stone walls are juxtaposed with
the walls, the architects have kept the windows flush
flat planes of exposed concrete subtly embossed with
with the exterior surface. In contrast, the existing
the grain of the timber shuttering. The juxtaposition
punctured windows are recessed into the wall
of the two materials and the contrast of surfaces
surface, creating deep shadow lines and revealing the
imparts a powerful, corporeal quality to the archi-
depth of the solid walls from the outside.
tecture. By lining the interior with an insulating layer
Switzerland has one of the most sophisticated
of concrete mixed with foamed recycled glass
ecological building standards worldwide and
(Misapor), a threefold upgrade was made: a new load-
the Swiss take pride in their ecological architecture.
bearing structure was formed, the old stone walls
While Savioz Fabrizzi has been respectful to the
were reinforced, and thermal insulation was provided.
existing fabric of the two-hundred-year-old house,
The massive, monolithic walls create a profound
the practice has also managed to upgrade it
sense of shelter and protection. The house is both
to the latest ecological standards. Thanks to the high
archaic, “ur-abode,” and a contemporary home at the
level of thermal insulation, controlled ventilation,
same time.
and energy supply from renewable sources, Maison Roduit complies with the Swiss “Minergie” energy conservation standard. Twenty-three square meters of solar panels on the roof generate around thirty-five percent of the annual heating requirement for heating and hot water supply. The strong material quality of this building in stone and concrete lends the architecture its force. The intervention is a modern continuum of alterations that the building has undergone over the centuries. It is a robust building that will probably endure well into the next century.
152
The imposing proximity of the rocks and its stone construction lend this building a unity with its surroundings. Savioz Fabrizzi
153
154
155
156
157
158
2ND FLOOR 1ST FLOOR SITE PLAN
GROUND FLOOR
1:1,000
1:300
159
SECTION
ANDREAS FUHRIMANN GABRIELLE HÄCHLER
Perhaps the myth of Swiss architecture is only a perception from outside, like Switzerland itself. Gabrielle Hächler
161
ANDREAS FUHRIMANN GABRIELLE HÄCHLER FINISHING TOWER ROTSEE, LUCERNE 2012 – 2013
The interesting aspect about the finishing tower on Lake Rotsee, near Lucerne, is that for most of the year it is not in use. The building remains closed during the winter months until July and opens for a few weeks of feverish activity during the annual summer rowing regatta, when it springs to life. While in use, the large-format shutters are slid open and popped up, exposing the interior spaces to the wide stretch of lake and the oarsmen in their sleek boats gliding past the finishing line that the tower demarcates. The height of the tower affords a vantage point from where the jury, press, and regatta committee can marshal the time of the rowers and observe proceedings from an elevated position. Zurich-based architects, Andreas Fuhrimann Gabrielle Hächler, think of their Zielturm or “finishing tower” as a hybrid structure—both functional and sculptural at the same time. As the surrounding natural landscape changes its guise when the seasons turn, so the tower stands closed and silent, an abstract form, sentinel-like, its watery reflection mirrored in the dark waters of the Red Lake. During the rowing regatta season, it takes up its “real” architectural function and opens up to the long body of water. Supported on a concrete platform, the prefabricated timber tower is composed of three spaces stacked above one another, rather like the wooden blocks from a child’s toy box. The manner in which the levels slightly shift in plan and the light-weight quality of the timber give the tower a light-hearted feel. It is reminiscent of a waterside bird-hide. Held above the water surface by concrete pillars, the structure appears to hover above the lake allowing the painterly landscape to envelop it. A slender concrete pier allows access to the tower across the water, anchoring the light timber structure onto the lakeshore. Together with the concrete stairway that links the lower level to the upper levels, the concrete jetty creates a solid spine that holds the tower visually, giving it weight. When closed the Zielturm is a quiet, enigmatic building that evokes a feeling of contemplation and possibility; but when opened up it is vibrant and playful.
There are universal aspects of architecture, general principles that apply. Nevertheless a feel for atmospheres is created regionally. Gabrielle Hächler
162
163
164
165
166
B A
A
2ND FLOOR
GROUND FLOOR
1:200
167
B
1ST FLOOR
SECTION A SECTION B
1:200
168
WEST ELEVATION
169
VALERIO OLGIATI
When you’re surrounded by the physical mass of these mountains, decisions are more simple, more direct. In this setting, we can operate in heavier dimensions. Valerio Olgiati
171
VALERIO OLGIATI
The white exterior is drawn into the interior
THE YELLOW HOUSE
exhibition spaces: walls and ceilings are white and
FLIMS
the timber floors are whitewashed. What is most
1997
conspicuous about the interior is the asymmetry. A heavy oak structural column is positioned off
Like snow covers a winter landscape in a unifying
center, creating an imbalance and precariousness
blanket of white, so the entire volume of the Yellow
to the spaces. The manner in which the column veers
House—regardless of the material beneath;
off at an obtuse angle in the upper level to meet
concrete, stone, or wood—is washed in pure white.
the roof apex exacerbates this sense of tilting
The brilliant surface visually distances the building
and being off-kilter. Olgiati plays with our senses and
from its local environment and radically transforms
makes us acutely aware of architecture as an art
an old farmhouse into a clean, modern piece of
form. This relatively small-scale building in a little
architecture where exhibitions on alpine architecture
town in the Alps of Graubünden is an internationally
are held. Valerio Olgiati’s clever renovation debunks
significant piece of contemporary architecture.
any preconception of quaint alpine architecture. The white cube is abstract; the bright white reflects every ray of sunlight to create a pure vision far removed from the mundane. From afar the museum looks like a minimalist sculpture, but as you move closer the patina of history is subtly revealed. Olgiati is a highly intellectual architect who likes to subvert norms and to challenge one’s perception. He believes that architects should make fundamental assertions about architecture; for him design is a thought process. Olgiati’s changes to the original building are selective and precise; nothing is arbitrary or random. He relocates the original street entrance to the eastern facade on the side of the building and raises it off the ground plane by a flight of stairs, creating a strip of concrete that reaches up to become a deep, cantilevered overhang. These are the only surfaces that have not been whitewashed, revealing their “naked” surface and demarcating the entry. The window reveals have been upgraded with in-situ cast concrete giving the openings a crisp, exact edge. To create the rustic, almost archaic surface texture, the old stone facades were remodeled with hammers and chisels. These crude surfaces starkly contrast the smooth concrete additions, though all are unified into a homogeneous whole by the white lime-wash. In order to heighten the facade and to create cubic proportions, the building has been crowned with a band of concrete.
172
The final coat of white, the finest of lime-washes, forms the outermost skin of the building. It conceals anything left unfinished. At the same time it points to a certain contradiction. The white lime-wash seems to turn the childlike archaism and animal substance of this structure into an abstract thought—which for its part gives the house itself the appearance of a “vision.” Valerio Olgiati
173
174
175
SOUTH ELEVATION SECTION
SITE PLAN
1:200
1:1,500
176
2ND FLOOR 1ST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR
1:200
177
By mixing pigment and crushed stone into the
VALERIO OLGIATI ATELIER BARDILL
concrete mix, the building mimics the rich brown
SCHARANS
tones of the old timber chalets surrounding it, thereby
2006–2007
integrating it into the village. Olgiati has elevated the material by infusing it with rich color and emboss-
Valerio Olgiati is renowned for his conceptually radical
ing it with intricate, handcrafted relief patterns that
architecture; his buildings are often confronta-
wrap the building inside and out, from the eaves to
tional and avant-garde. For Atelier Bardill in Scharans,
the ground. The architect is adamant that the random
south of Chur, Olgiati was commissioned by the
pattern of rosettes—inspired by the decoration of
well-known Swiss writer and musician, Linard Bardill
an old Baroque chest belonging to Bardill—is a pure
who bought a dilapidated old barn in the center
decorative fancy that holds no symbolism. It does
of the hamlet. Olgiati was not enthusiastic about the
however strengthen the conception of the building as
idea of simply renovating the old barn, but neither
monolithic and monochrome, while also reducing
were the local residents eager to have an outlandish
the building’s monumentality. The all-encompassing
piece of modern architecture dominating the
surface treatment creates a homogeneous whole
historic fabric of their hamlet. A compromise was
within and without, reflecting the way the atelier
agreed upon to recreate the new building within the
oscillates between privacy and openness to the public
exact silhouette contour of the old barn.
and echoing metaphorically the way the lives of
The building Olgiati conceived is not at all what
artists vacillate between the introvert solitude of
it seems at first glance. From the outside it looks
creation and the extrovert showcasing of their work.
monolithic and solid and there is an expectation of
This private /public fluctuation is also reflected
a series of large spaces behind the monolithic
in the building via the large aperture in the western
gable roofs. This unspoken promise is not fulfilled
facade facing the village square. The opening
though, as within the walls is only one, single sixty-
looks out at the surroundings and affords views of the
square-meter space. This rust-colored space with its
alp, Piz Beverin, while also allowing the public a
triangular fireplace wedged into the corner is
glimpse into the atrium from the square. This struc-
Bardill’s atelier. Although the building might seem
ture invites one to consider what defines a building:
monolithic, the bulk of the volume is actually a void,
the facade envelope or the enclosed interior
an atrium open to the sky enclosed by walls and
spaces? Does a building have to have a roof to be
crowned theatrically by an elliptically shaped cutout.
defined as a building? What can be said for certain is
Like an illusionist, Olgiati has conjured up a build-
that Olgiati’s architecture is both highly provocative
ing out of thin air in an ironic gesture typical of his
and aesthetically appealing. It never fails to
work.
surprise.
By using the red concrete it has a more natural touch, it is wilder, like it has grown out of the earth. My white buildings, on the other hand, are more the product of a disciplined intellect. Valerio Olgiati
178
179
180
181
182
WEST ELEVATION SECTION SITE PLAN
GROUND FLOOR
1:5,000
1:200
183
A CULTIVATED ORDINARINESS
Cultural Models in Recent Swiss Architecture Irina Davidovici
184
Since the 1990s, Swiss architecture has been gaining a steady following. Two Pritzker Prize winners in one decade, Herzog & de Meuron in 2001 and Peter Zumthor in 2009, as well as a great number of signature buildings built by Swiss practices in international locations, show architecture to be one of the country’s most successful exports. This global discourse is dominated by a handful of household names, whose buildings inside and outside Switzerland are eagerly received and lengthily discussed in the professional and lay press. Architectural tourism has become an established occurrence, not only in the main cities but also in remote locations in Graubünden and Ticino, where famous architects have been responsible at one time or another for local public buildings and private houses. The visitors of architectural landmarks will notice that such special projects do not, however, court the attention of outsiders. Rather, they are usually engaging in meaningful dialogue with the well built, carefully maintained environments in which they are located. Unlike much of Europe, where man-made landscapes are preponderant, those crossing Switzerland along the most established routes get a high dose of seemingly natural picturesqueness. Lakes and mountains punctuate every other stretch of high- and railway. The rural industry is small in scale and tightly controlled, complementing quaint, churched villages and traditional-looking farmhouses. Suburban sprawl flashes only briefly past the windshields and billboards, and advertisements are few and far between. In such settings those accustomed to the big names of Swiss architecture will often spot buildings that look like tributes to their work. Sleek concrete constructions and sheds abstractly clad in timber slats fleetingly catch the eye as being designed, rather than expediently constructed. Such structures are rather ambiguous: on one hand they claim attention through a level of aesthetic ambition that surpasses their functionality as houses or workshops. On the other hand, by taking a previously radical architectural statement and normalizing it through repetition, they relegate it once again to the domain of the functional. This interplay between anonymous and authored architecture is not surprising in a country whose sophisticated transport infrastructure of viaducts, bridges, and dams is in itself a major Baukunst. It is not just that such engineered structures, despite being built for utility, have an unquestionably emotional effect. They also draw attention to a culturally embedded trait of Swiss production, namely its quality. The demand for precision in the provision of infrastructure has created a high level of skill within the construction industry, on which architects have grown used to rely. For this reason concrete structures—whether signaling stations, houses, or museums—are more frequent here and less controversial than in other countries; their smoothness both metaphorical and literal. Traditional materials, like timber and stone, display a similar level of technical know-how, in their case rooted less in industrial precision than in the craft culture that still characterizes Switzerland’s rural regions. They too provide sources for contemporaneous architectural work, and not merely as historical precedents. Building in timber is particularly established and thus seen to be the most appropriate material, especially in locations where it is cheap and plentiful, and where the knowledge of working with it has been passed down through generations. Just as the dominant materials vary between urban and rural locations, the architectural strategies that they call into being are also different. Whether the backdrop is a traditional village or an Alpine range, the implausible picturesqueness of Swiss countryside serves contemporary architecture very well. Three strategies dominate here, of which the first—the creation of abstract artifacts like Valerio Olgiati’s Visitor’s Center at Zernez—is of little relevance to the present discussion of models and copies. Intended to stand out against their background, such buildings do not lend themselves easily to replication and normalization. Their presence is as surprising as it is unique in these areas of outstanding natural beauty, where conservative forces often prevail.
185
A widespread and more ambivalent strategy consists of combining forms or materials borrowed from traditional architecture with others easily identifiable as being contemporary. Olgiati’s atelier for the musician Linard Bardill in Scharans and the little Lieptgas cabin by Nickisch Walder on the outskirts of Flims are cases in point. While poured in concrete, their pitched roofs and compact volumetries precisely replicate the outline of the agricultural structures they have replaced, which is the planning condition for many new developments in protected rural areas. These predetermined dimensions are not that well suited to current use: the former building is too big for a musician’s recording studio, the latter rather too small for a full-fledged holiday cabin. Both works, however, use these restrictions creatively. Olgiati’s project only encloses a third of the outlined volume, allowing the rest to operate as a hortus conclusus, doubling up as outdoor venue for intimate concerts. Nickisch and Walder increased the original volume by digging underground and revealing in the process a natural geological formation, memorably framed in the lower window. Both projects make use of the fluidity of concrete in order to recall the traditional original structures yet compensate for these with modern radical means, whether red pigment and pattern in the case of the former or an insulated cast of the previous log cabin in the case of the latter. The third strategy, the almost complete replication of traditional forms, materials, and details, consciously removes the distance between the new architecture and its vernacular models. While seemingly the least radical, this has the most intriguing implications. On one hand they are most likely to blend unobtrusively with their surroundings and lay claim to the wholeness of traditional architecture, on the other they can easily be overlooked as architectural statements with an independent artistic value. Amounting over time to an infrastructural project, the private houses, small public facilities, and utilitarian structures built by Gion A. Caminada over the years in his native Vrin employ the materials and construction methods at hand, placing timber volumes built in the local strickbau technique over stone bases, in the manner of most existing houses. The buildings use a slightly abstract volumetry and construction details, but to the untrained eye, the color of new timber is the only mark distinguishing them from the fabric of the village. While this adoption of traditional means creates a rapprochement of the architectural object and its intended use, it also makes it hard to distinguish the authored statements from purely utilitarian structures. Swiss cities present a different problem, spurred by a typical condition of anonymity. As a rule, existing Swiss urban environments tend towards upholding the existing norms. Although some practices are interested in producing singular buildings, such developments are usually relegated to the peripheries. In Zurich or Geneva, where vast opportunities for rebuilding have recently opened through the relocation of industries, the accent is placed on replicating a sense of urbanity: high density, vast street fronts, regular grids of openings, hard landscaping. Commissions are distributed among local and international practices through professional competitions and collaborations, the heterogeneity of different authorships being intended to create an atmosphere of spontaneous, piecemeal development. The demands for originality of expression on one hand and adherence to recognizable types on the other give rise to intense, challenging urban experiences. In city centers there are fewer opportunities for grand architectural statements. New developments are usually politically sensitive, leading rarely to the creation of “monuments”—one-off prestigious buildings such as museums—and more frequently to “houses,” in which various programs are concealed behind regular facades similar to that of the predominant urban types. The generality of such areas is itself intriguing. It is not unusual to walk past authored buildings published all over the world, and which fit so well in the existing context that they do not attract any particular attention to themselves. Diener & Diener’s residential and office developments in Basel deliberately blend in with the existing city fabric, rather than assert themselves as authored architectural artifacts. Replicating the characteristically anonymous urban types, these projects oscillate between the invisibility of mass-produced units and autonomous forms. They perpetrate an understanding of the European city as a cohesive, if heterogeneous, cultural proposition.
186
The theoretical armature behind such developments dates back to the 1970s, when Swiss architects began experimenting with various techniques to integrate architectural objects into their surroundings. After two post-war decades had almost exhausted the range of architectural modernism, the Western architectural discourse was once again beginning to view history as a source of inspiration. But, whereas nineteenth-century historicism had concentrated on heroic models, as if to bestow Classical glory upon prosperous capitalist societies, after two world wars this discredited notion was viewed with more caution. As Neorealism and Pop Art would so clearly show, the preferred historical precedents were no longer the extraordinary and the monumental, but rather the humble and ordinary. In the Swiss case, the search for culturally relevant precedents revealed two main models, equally determined by pragmatic rather than purely representational needs. The oldest, used predominantly in rural situations, was the traditional architecture of peasant houses and agricultural structures, where the use of stone and timber had in time been elevated to a high level of skill. The more urban the project, the more ubiquitous, consisting of modernist housing and industrial developments common in Switzerland since the 1930s. Originating in a heroic factory aesthetic, this kind of moderate modernism was nevertheless removed from the radical left-wing ideology associated with the modernist avant-garde of the 1920s. Instead, its longevity was rooted in its capacity to represent the dominance and interests of an economically prosperous bourgeoisie. The turn to history in order to make sense of the present situation was theoretically grounded in Postmodernism: namely the use of a doubly coded architecture, targeting an audience of connoisseurs through sophisticated references, while courting popular appreciation with the use of familiar, widely recognizable design motifs. Although dismissive of Postmodernism’s eclectic formalism, Swiss architects were strongly influenced by two key postmodernist thinkers, Aldo Rossi and Robert Venturi. From Rossi’s evocative, yet ambivalent notion of “analogous architecture,” they learnt to employ familiar types and forms that would imbue new buildings with rich associations built over far longer periods of time. Venturi’s rhetorical question “Is not Main Street almost all right?” signaled a genuine, if slightly condescending interest in everyday environments.¹ For the Swiss, his writings opened a way of coming to terms with their local versions of “ugly and ordinary architecture.” The industrial peripheries, anonymous suburbs, and anodyne housing estates that had characterized the experiences of growing up in 1950s Switzerland became valid models for the Swiss architectural generation emerging in the late 1970s. The interest in forms, materials, and environments rendered familiar through use and repetition was more palpable in the early to mid-1980s. The early projects of Herzog & de Meuron or Diener & Diener made reference to common urban and suburban types, gardens, and industrial structures. Peter Zumthor, who before setting up his practice had worked as carpenter and later as conservation architect, found inspiration in the mountain architecture in and around Chur. The adherence to the regional characteristics and cultural references of each project gave rise from the outset to a wide and diverging discourse that cannot be placed simply under the banner of a national Swiss identity. But one thread connecting these designs was their artistic ambition, not manifested at a conceptual level. Swiss projects continue to adopt techniques of camouflage by replicating the forms or materiality of local architecture—a strategy combining artistic or intellectual reasoning with more pragmatic concessions to planning requirements and popular taste. Whether aesthetically or politically motivated—frequently a mixture of both—such gestures of mediation and restraint tend to add, rather than subtract from the merit of the original artistic impulse. As radical visions encounter the demanding realities of specific locations, established construction techniques, programmatic requirements, or budget limits, they are subjected to processes of selection and refinement that result in better, richer, more evocative designs. Peter Zumthor’s early projects are a demonstration of sorts, grounded in a personal search for buildings that “give the impression of being a self-evident part of their surroundings, [that] seem to be saying: ‘I am as you see me and I belong here.’”²
187
This aesthetic of the self-evident is not without ambiguities. In trying to look “as if it had always been there,” an architecture that replicates the spontaneity of vernacular or industrial building taps into a rich area of cultural memory. One immediate problem is the improbability of achieving the so-called “authenticity” of the originals. Artistic ambition results in differentiation, which implies a degree of alienation. Once conceptualized, the “self-evident” becomes ever harder to attain. The efforts to replicate the simple and direct correlations between form, material, and construction found in traditional or utilitarian architectures are, generally, neither simple nor direct. Another problem is that of the fraught relationship of copies to their models. Once history and tradition start to be used as a repository of forms for contemporary designs, there is little guidance to establish what constitutes appropriate referencing and what does not. There is no clear boundary between legitimate quotation and second-rate pastiche. Each building that bridges tradition and innovation in a genuinely valuable manner will almost inevitably be followed by a number of diluted copies, replicating the formal or material character of the original without its intellectual acuity. In Switzerland, moderation is historically constituted and politically reinforced. The integration of architectural objects into their environment is part of the local culture, representing a manner of social responsibility. The intense scrutiny of vernacular architecture, its references and quotations in contemporary production are a consequence of this cultural conditioning. Here, as elsewhere however, a contemporary architecture struggling for definition has to balance the demands of wider intelligibility with those of artistic ambition. The issue of influences runs in two directions. While initially, supported by an intellectual positioning, “high architecture” borrowed from anonymous construction, the opposite is increasingly the case. Formal devices and technical innovations first articulated in unique and experimental projects have been absorbed into the mainstream. The greatest danger in this phenomenon of normalization lies in purely formal reproduction, without an appropriate level of technical or intellectual circumspection. The replication is not problematic in itself: at an empirical level, all architecture is rooted in the reproduction, adoption, and adaptation of precedents. Such processes open a wide spectrum of possibilities. One extreme is trivial, even morally questionable developments, intended to compensate through economic gain whatever they lack in cultural value. At another end are those rare and all the more valuable instances when an anonymous copy attains the spontaneous correlation of form and purpose that has evaded its more pedigreed model. The elusive quality of a “self-evident” architecture sometimes results from artistic ambition being overruled by the demands of reasonableness. ¹ Venturi, Robert. Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York: The Museum of Modern Art Press, 1966, p. 104. ² Zumthor, Peter. Thinking Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 2006, p. 17.
188
BEARTH & DEPLAZES
Creating architecture is like chess, you play against an opponent, but in effect against yourself. You challenge yourself—the stronger you are, the better. Andrea Deplazes
189
BEARTH & DEPLAZES
Beyond the courtrooms, there is more to discover
WITH DURISCH + NOLLI
and admire in this building: an enormous wall
CRIMINAL COURTS
mural by Giuseppe Bolzani from 1952, which the archi-
BELLINZONA
tects were obliged to keep due to its historical sig-
2013
nificance. The mural adorns the dark, timber-paneled cafeteria on the first floor facing the piazza. This
Behind a handsomely proportioned, stark white neo-
communal area enriches the whole and creates a
classical facade, hidden from the view of the general
counterpoint to the whiteness elsewhere. The library,
public, lies an unexpected architectural jewel.
encircling the angled ceiling construction on the
The building, formerly a business school, houses the
second floor, is also noteworthy. It is suspended above
federal criminal courts and is situated in the
the main courtroom, metaphorically as a kind of
Italian-speaking canton, Ticino. For the architects—
“higher order” of accumulated knowledge. The library
Valentin Bearth, Andrea Deplazes and Daniel Ladner
is furnished in deep, smoked oak and is lit from
in collaboration with Pia Durisch and Aldo Nolli—
above with diffuse light. The light courts, where the
it was clear that rather than demolishing the building,
stairs are situated that lead up to the offices, slice
they would renovate and extend the existing
through the entire depth of the building and are also
structure, which dates back to 1895. The extension is
flooded with natural light. Ascending the stairs
seamless: the architects applied the dimensions
towards the light are views across the entire triple-
of the old building, continued the eaves line, adopted
height volume creating a certain drama. Delicate
vertical windows of the same size and proportion
touches of gold bronze in the slender balustrades add
as the original, and continued the color scheme
a sense of refinement and prestige to the building.
in bright, white concrete. It has been conceived with
The sheer perfection of the concrete work is
such sensitivity that the new addition is scarcely
astounding, with the straight, sharp edges and scal-
noticeable.
loped curves of the window reveals displaying
On approaching the building from the old city,
the height of precision craftsmanship. This building
the brilliant white facades shine out from the
manages to express opulence while being reserved
surrounding urban fabric and, on entering, one is
at the same time; it is concrete proof that it is
unprepared for the spatial spectacle that lies behind
possible to revitalize an old building in a respectful,
the portico, beyond the security lobby and revolv-
innovative manner, creating a beautiful new piece of
ing doors. The progression of intermediary spaces
architecture that captures the zeitgeist of the
leads to the lightness and brightness of a courtroom
twenty-first century.
that flows through concertina folding doors into another, even higher, even brighter chamber illuminated from a skylight high above. The restraint and reserve of the lower areas is counterbalanced by the magnificent vaults that rise up to gather light from the oculi at their apexes. Massive, precast triangular concrete elements reflect the triangular shape of the pyramidal ceiling space. The swirling, organic texture of the surface is not a mere decorative fancy, but serves the vital function of regulating acoustics: audibility is clearly imperative in a courtroom. The interplay of light on the surface and the textured pattern is sumptuous and alluring. There is an echo of ancient Rome here: according to the architects, the oculus of the Pantheon and the coffered dome of Borromini’s Baroque San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane were both inspirations for the design of the courtrooms.
190
191
192
193
194
SITE PLAN
1:3,000
195
SECTION A SECTION B
1:400
196
A B
A
B
GROUND FLOOR
197
1ST FLOOR
1:400
198
2ND FLOOR
199
BEARTH & DEPLAZES
Completely sheathed in slender bands of shim-
MONTE ROSA HUT
mering silver aluminum, the structure is like a
ZERMATT
mountain crystal, as crisp and pristine as the sheer,
2005 – 2009
snow-capped peaks rising around it. The shape of the multi-faceted volume was generated partly by
The area southeast of Zermatt has one of the most
optimizing the orientation and angle of inclination
spectacular landscapes in Switzerland. One of
for the array of photovoltaic panels—the building’s
the classic alpine walks is the hike up to the Gorner-
generator of electricity. Not only does the poly-
grat, a hard, three-hour trek by foot to the site of
gonal form create unusually shaped spaces, it also
Monte Rosa Hut. Stretched between the Gornergrat
optimizes the facade surface area.
and the Matterhorn is the second largest glacial
The primary structure consists of a radiating,
system in the Alps and this high-altitude landscape
star-shaped steel platform on concrete pile
is a kind of Heilige Welt, or sacred world of rock,
foundations, which supports the prefabricated light-
glacier, snow, mountain, sky, where the experience of
weight timber structure above. Entry to the hut
nature is an exhilarating experience. To dare to
is through a subterranean level that ascends via
build in such an awe-inspiring landscape might seem
a timber stair to the communal spaces on the ground
like a violation; with the opportunity to realize
level. A slender ribbon window encircles the space
a mountain hut came a responsibility to build with
and affords magnificent panoramic views of the
great sensitivity.
surrounding mountain peaks. Above, on three levels,
In celebration of the 150th anniversary the
trapezoidal-shaped bunkrooms—accommodating
ETH (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) and the
a total of 120 beds—fan out from the central
SAC (Swiss Alpine Club) joined forces under the
landing. Inside, the hut is clad in honey-colored wood
leadership of the architect Andrea Deplazes to mark
creating a warm, intimate atmosphere and an im-
the university’s bicentenary by replacing the
pression of shelter and protection from the harsh
old SAC hut with a new, modern building. Clearly,
elements on the high Alps.
constructing a building at an altitude of almost 3,000
The clever combination of high-tech and low-
meters posed immense logistical and technical
tech has elevated the tradition of alpine huts to new
challenges with neither road access, electricity, nor
heights of sustainability and design. Bearth &
water. All the building material had to be flown to
Deplazes display a sensitivity for the tectonic nature
the site by helicopter, restricting the weight of each
of built form and for its ability to transform the
element to a maximum of 600 kilograms. Site
remote, craggy site. The design team has managed
work was also limited to snow-free summer months,
to harness the Ort der Kraft (force of the place)
so the schedule had to be strictly planned. A hut
in their topographic building, with the sheer drama
in such an inaccessible site has to be as self-sufficient
of the landscape reflected in the spectacular, crys-
as possible and has to be able to generate as much
talline architecture.
of its own energy as possible. Therefore, water is collected in a cavern and channeled to the hut which, thanks to wastewater treatment, can be reused multiple times. Thermal collectors beneath the building warm the water, while a photovoltaic array provides electricity. The project was seen as an experimental laboratory to see how a building in a remote, inaccessible place high in the Alps can be self-sufficient and sustainable. Initially the building created 90% of its energy requirements, but as visitor numbers far exceeded the original estimates, upgrades and contingency plans have had to be made to accommodate the high volume of mountaineers.
200
201
202
203
204
3RD FLOOR 1ST FLOOR
1:200
205
SECTION
1:200
206
GROUND FLOOR
207
:MLZD
To achieve good architecture, the architect should have passion, curiosity, and perseverance. :mlzd
209
This building is differentiated from the traditional
:MLZD EXTENSION OF THE HISTORY MUSEUM
notion of a building with four vertical walls and
BERN
a roof. The volume stands like a concrete crystal with
2006 – 2009
the rear consisting of five inclined, triangular planes and a front face that, in contrast, is cut vertical, as
:mlzd’s extension of the Bernese History Museum is
if a stone had been sliced in two to reveal its smooth,
an excellent example of an extension of a historic
glazed inner core. Captivatingly, the tower as
building that is neither subservient nor dominant, but
seen from the north evaporates optically: the highly
succeeds in creating its own independent standing
reflective glass mirrors the old museum Schloss so
and enhances the existing fabric. The addition hides
that the tower, itself, disappears. The facade has been
modestly behind the original museum, which has
detailed to clip directly onto the concrete crystal
a prominent position at the head of Kirchenfeld Bridge
form. It is this mirroring effect and lack of frame that
linking Bern Altstadt to Helvetiaplatz across the
heighten the effect of dematerialization.
Aare River. Approaching the building, one has no
Similar to Herzog & de Meuron’s “Art Space” in
inkling that behind the romantic nineteenth-century
Tenerife, the concrete planes have been incised
historicism lies a highly contemporary piece of
with overscaled pixels that are randomly embossed
architecture.
onto the surface. In some instances the “pixels”
The new volume forms a provocative counterpoint
are shallow, in others deeply imprinted, and elsewhere
to the eclectic old building by André Lambert that
cut completely through the thirty-five-centimeter-
dates back to 1894. The design by Biel-based :mlzd
thick concrete shell to allow spots of sunlight into the
architects is intelligent—a large proportion of
offices. The OSB (oriented strand board) formwork
the newly acquired spaces are submerged beneath
and the yellow tinted concrete mix imbue the surfaces
the terrain gaining a substantial 1,000-square-meter,
with a finely varied patina and texture. The yellow/
windowless exhibition hall, not visible from the
gray color of the concrete is perfectly attuned to
exterior. The hall—an expansive black void—is the
the plasterwork patina of Lambert’s historic building.
antithesis of the prominent, light-colored volume
Together with the brilliant mirror reflection, this
above. Within this column-free void the curators can
reference creates a fascinating interplay and dialogue
assemble and reassemble exhibitions, like erasing
between old and new. :mlzd’s extension radiates
the markings on a blackboard and then redrawing
a new energy to the museum precinct and creates a
them anew. Beneath the hall, 3,200 square meters of
modern, twenty-first century landmark for Switzer-
storage space is stacked in two layers. The only
land’s capital city.
visible facade is the “fifth” facade: the roof of the hall, which is a raised terrace. Although there is a lack of human activity on the terrace, it nevertheless plays an important role as it gives the new and old sections their own domain and spatial integrity. The southern side of the site is bordered by the “Titan Tower.” :mlzd have made a contemporary interpretation of a looming castle tower, which is the architectural exclamation mark of the project. Eminent Bernese engineers, Tschopp Engineers played a critical role in solving the challenging details and structural scheme of the faceted, crystalline turret. Interestingly, the tower is not part of the museum, but accommodates offices, library, and reading room of the State Archives.
The sequence of the three different outdoor spaces— “garden,” “square,” and “stairway”—ensures that the new structure dovetails with the pre-existing ensemble and blends into its urban environment. :mlzd
210
211
212
213
214
A
B
A
B
ENTRY FLOOR
1:700
215
SECTION A SECTION B
1:700
216
3RD FLOOR 2ND FLOOR 1ST FLOOR EXHIBITION FLOOR
217
STUDIO VACCHINI
Architecture in Switzerland and in the world today is increasingly a matter of form. What our work tries to propose instead is the development of technology, not in the service of style or form, but rather of human society. Eloisa Vacchini
219
STUDIO VACCHINI SPORTS CENTER MÜLIMATT WINDISCH 2010
In a country that takes its sports seriously and where the winters are long and cold, indoor sports facilities are essential for year-round training. The challenge faced by Locarno-based Studio Vacchini was to create a sports hall for the University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland FHNW without structural inner walls or column supports. Together with engineers, Fürst Laffranchi, Studio Vacchini managed to push the boundaries of technology with their fifty-five-meter-wide, support-free gymnasium. Situated between the Aare River and the railway line, the sports center is an easy five-minute walk from Brugg railway station. It is the elaborate concrete surfaces that immediately strike one. The interior houses two large sports halls with tribunes and service spaces. The delicate concrete structure has been designed with the clarity and precision of a Swiss watch. Like a giant accordion, the slender concrete pulls open to create a dynamic zigzag rhythm of solid and glazed peaks and troughs. It is not only the strength of the design, but also the absolute precision and delicacy of the concrete work that is outstanding. Typically sports halls are colorful spaces, but here Vacchini has continued the muted gray color palette of the exterior facades inside the gymnasium halls, creating a calm, cool atmosphere. It is the sportsmen and women who bring color and movement into the light-filled spaces. The slight incline of the terrain results in a portion of the lower level being subterranean. Service areas, like changing rooms and showers, are neatly tucked away. Access stairs to the lower level in the center of the eighty-meter structure divide the hall into two generous spaces, each with three basketball courts. This self-supporting structure without inner structural walls is a feat of modern engineering. Studio Vacchini has clearly combined intellectual rigor with technical know-how. Not only did the architects achieve their ambitious goal, but they also managed to create a masterful piece of architecture that, like a folded origami sculpture, is both delicate and strong.
The technique and technology enable man to rise to higher limits, to make the construction of spaces more precise and more exciting. Studio Vacchini
220
221
222
223
224
SITE PLAN
1:2,500
225
B
A
B
A
1ST FLOOR GROUND FLOOR
1:1,000
226
SECTION A SECTION B
1:500
227
EM2N
We approach the permanent state of crisis of our built environment, neither with irony nor drama, but rather with a cold look at what is. EM2N
229
EM2N SWISS RAILWAYS SERVICE FACILITY ZURICH 2013
The extensive train network in Switzerland is widely known for its efficiency and punctuality. As the country is so compact, it is feasible to live in one city and commute to another. It is not uncommon to forgo owning a car, as the public transport system is sophisticated and wide ranging, so that even the most remote valleys and mountain villages can be reached by rail, bus, or cable car. The reliability of the rail network has meant ever-increasing numbers of rail passengers, with trains having to increase in length to accommodate greater numbers. The new four-hundred-meter rail facility in Zurich caters for these excessively long trains. As the site was predetermined and the structure predefined by engineers, the assignment for the architects had design limitations. Their sole task was to create an envelope to wrap the southern facade. Using five-meter elements that widen and narrow in interlocking waves, the architects have expressed the facade in three dimensions. It might appear like a large, inflatable structure, but the curtain-wall of the facade is made with glass-fiber reinforced concrete. By omitting individual concrete elements, long, horizontal fissures are created allowing light and views into the interior workshop areas. The curvature profile of the concrete units decreases in the lower section of the facades to allow access for fire engines. The slow, undulating lines are an apt articulation for a rail service building and reflect the linear dynamic of the fast-moving trains along the tracks. As a preventive measure, the surfaces were treated with a hydrophobic membrane to protect them from graffiti. The exit and entry on the short facades are completely glazed from floor to ceiling and are recessed, creating the impression of continuity, as if it were merely a section of a building that could be extended indefinitely. Within the constraints of a tight budget, EM2N were able to design a distinctive building that enhances the area along the railway tracks. What might have been an industrial wasteland has instead been transformed into an artistically expressive site.
Through its central position next to the rapidly developing new neighborhood of Zurich-West and by virtue of its sheer size, the new building acquires great urban significance. It shapes the edge of the city towards the railway tracks and welcomes visitors entering the city by train, signaling that they are arriving in Zurich’s city center. EM2N
230
231
232
233
234
B
B
A
GROUND FLOOR
1:1,500
235
SOUTH ELEVATION SECTION A
1:1,500
236
SECTION B
1:500
237
CONDITIONS OF PRACTICE Jean-Paul Jaccaud
238
The prevailing winds of global contemporary practice are blowing architects towards the increasingly marginal position of providing a je ne sais quoi of veneer over a construction process that they no longer control or even fully understand. If these winds do blow through the alpine landscapes of Switzerland, they have not yet had the same devastating effects as in other countries where the voice of the architect has become difficult to hear over the clatter of indifferent clients, large design teams, standardized industrial solutions, and economic constraints. Swiss architects, seen within the main global trends of the profession, enjoy conditions of practice somewhere between a dream come true and a fragile anachronism. It would be a mistake to idealize Swiss architectural production; there are an incalculable number of dreadful buildings being erected every year. Though somehow a high level of control has been maintained over the process of design and construction, enabling the production of an architecture that maintains its coherence from the urban scale through to the fine detail. How exactly this has come about is a complex question that cannot easily be answered. I believe, however, that certain key aspects have played an important role in establishing the strong architectural culture that the country enjoys and I would like to attempt an informal exploration of what some of these aspects might be. Swiss architects’ responsibilities cover many different aspects of the construction process that, in other countries, would be left to other professions. They are not only responsible for the design of their projects, they must also ensure their cost estimate and control, the coordination of the design team, and the management of the construction site. If this breadth of competences and know-how ensures a unique level of control, the most important specificities, in my view, lie in the control of the construction site process and the costs. If main contractors abound in Switzerland, there is still a very strong presence of specialized trades whose know-how is ensured by a well-established apprenticeship system. Projects are still mostly allocated to different specialist contractors whose work is coordinated on site by the architect. This role, one of a main contractor in other countries, enables the architect to keep an extremely tight control over every aspect of the construction process and ensures that little is lost in translation between drawings and their implementation. The control of costs, from the initial estimate through to the detailed quantities and unit prices on site enables, in tandem with the site management, a clear understanding of what is being bought, where the money is spent, and what is being cut if savings are required. Several factors have contributed to this privileged position: principally a framework of historically rooted associations defending the interests of the profession and an education system that encourages a detailed understanding of the construction process. Professional associations have played a significant historical role in Swiss architectural culture. The two principal bodies, the Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA) and the Federation of Swiss Architects (BSA-FAS) were founded respectively in 1837 and 1908 and have been continuously active in defending different aspects of the profession. If the SIA encompasses a broader professional scope of engineering and architecture, the BSAFAS solely defends the interests of architects and both bodies frequently work in tandem. The work of the professional associations has been crucial in ensuring a clear definition and understanding of the architect’s role, as well as contractual and financial conditions that enable a high quality of work to be carried out. While this might sound obvious, it is far from being the case in most countries and rarely is the role, scope of works, and fee structure so clearly established. The framework provided enables Swiss architects to provide a great deal of clarity when discussing a commission with their clients and expectations can therefore be clearly understood. Architectural competitions play a major role in Swiss architectural culture and the professional associations have historically defended them from the start for their organization, their supervision, and for maintaining independent professional juries.
239
The 1980s and 1990s saw profound changes in the economic, cultural, and technical aspects of the profession and their effects on urbanism and architecture were the subject of heated debate. This led to the establishment, in 1996, of the inter-cantonal laws for the tender of public projects, which ensure that all public projects are systematically subject to anonymous, project-based competitions with independent professional juries. This not only provides a basis for a strong architectural culture, but also ensures that less established practices have access to commissions on the sole basis of the quality of their work. The fluidity of this system keeps everyone within the profession on their toes and ensures that cronyism and backhand commissions are absent from the landscape of public commissions. Younger practices benefit immensely from this system that provides constant fresh propositions and ensures debate, discussion, and the permanent questioning of established ideas. It is interesting to see that most of the leading practices working in Switzerland today were established through the competition system and that their work continues to evolve through the constant pressure of a highly competitive environment. Most of the younger practices that would benefit from the competition system have been formed in Switzerland and there is an almost uncanny level of continuity between the educative institutions and the profession. Adolf Loos famously described the architect as a stonemason who has learned Latin, while Swiss schools continue to favor masonry as a vital ingredient of the curriculum. The Anglo-Saxon culture, among others, puts a strong emphasis on Latin during the formative years, anticipating that the masonry will be learnt through practice after graduation. Young architects are, in this case, carrying out an informal master’s degree in the practices where they choose to work and the education system has largely outsourced the nuts and bolts aspects to the professional world. The Swiss architectural education rests on three different pillars. The two Federal Institutes of Technology, in Zurich and Lausanne, the HES-SO technical schools, and apprenticeships. If the first two essentially concern future architectural practitioners, the latter provides an education to both architects and specialist contractors who will play an essential role in the construction process. In all instances students are exposed to the multidisciplinary aspects of architecture and are brought in close contact with engineers and construction methods to ensure that their skills will enable them to inscribe their future work within a clearly defined system. This approach has led to a specific grammar of the architectural culture with construction as its bedrock and a common tectonic ground. Practice and education intertwine in many instances and feed off each other, making student end-of-year shows a synthesis of current positions within the professional debate and competition entries often influenced by student investigations. Apart from a short period of dismay following May 1968, particularly in the French-speaking part of the country, where social studies became preponderant, the Swiss architectural education has always been based on the Beaux-Arts notion of the studio, l’ate lier, where projects are produced in conditions close to that of practice. This leads to an understanding of the methods of professional practice and generally steers clear of abstract theoretical ground. Part of the curriculum of the architectural training also involves a year-out of work experience within architectural practices. The students who have worked in a practice frequently return after their graduation as full architects, and diploma projects inevitably reveal where students have spent their year out by the mimetic nature of the work presented.
240
The strength of the professional associations, the high levels of control on the project development, and construction, the common ground of construction as a basis for architectural expression, the competition system, and a solid educational backing, all these factors unite to give architectural practice a strong foundation on which to develop. Switzerland is a small country but an extraordinarily diverse one culturally, linguistically, and topographically. The foundations laid for conditions of practice enable very different expressions to emerge confidently from this diversity and one would be hard pressed to find a constant in contemporary Swiss architectural culture. The architectural freedom that the conditions of practice give is liberating for the profession, allowing extremely different forms of expression to emerge without the insecurity of having to conform to a dogma to establish one’s identity. Many attempts have been made to pigeonhole Swiss architecture as a coherent whole, the “Swiss box” of the late 1990s being the most publicized. I do not find this approach interesting or helpful to understand the current architectural culture. It is in my view more through conditions of practice that Swiss architecture finds its specificity, and the different formal proposals that can emerge from them are only a manifestation of the healthy foundations on which these complex and shifting constructions are based.
241
BIOGRAPHIES Anna Roos Anna Roos studied architecture at the University of Cape Town and obtained a postgraduate degree at the Bartlett School of Architecture at UCL, London under the professorship of Niall McLaughlin. Moving to Bern, Switzerland in 2000, she worked as an architect, designing projects in South Africa, Australia, and Scotland. She has been working as a freelance architectural journalist since 2007 and writes for c3, A10, Ensuite Kultur Magazin, Monocle magazine, and Swisspearl Architecture maga zine. She also copyedits books for numerous publishing houses in Germany and Switzerland including: Lars Müller Publishers, Birkhäuser Verlag, DOM, Gestalten, DETAIL Green, and Prestel Publishers. Anna seeks to convey her passion for architecture in her writing about the discipline. R. James Breiding R. James Breiding is author of Swiss Made—The Untold Story Behind Switzerland’s Success. Available in seven languages, the book has become the most authoritative work on “Swissness.” His articles on Swiss issues appear in The Economist, Finan cial Times, Foreign Affairs, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. He was elected a fellow at Harvard’s Center for International Development, and is the founder and owner of Naissance Capital, a Zurich-based investment firm. Jean-Paul Jaccaud Jean-Paul Jaccaud was born in Hong Kong in 1971. He studied architecture at the Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL) where he graduated in 1995. Jaccaud collaborated with Bernard Huet, David Chipperfield, and Herzog & de Meuron before opening his own practice, Jean-Paul Jaccaud Architects in Geneva, in 2004. In 2011, in partnership with Tanya Zein, he founded Jaccaud Zein Architects in London. In 2014 Lionel Spicher became a full partner of the Geneva practice which was subsequently renamed Jaccaud Spicher Associated Architects. Jaccaud has been visiting professor at the Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL) and at the Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL) in Belgium and has been a visiting critic at numerous architecture schools in Europe, the USA, and the Middle East. Irina Davidovici Architect and academic Irina Davidovici is the author of Forms of Practice. GermanSwiss Architecture 1980–2000 (gta Verlag, 2012). Born in Bucharest and based in Zurich and London, she draws in her writings on multilayered professional and cultural experiences, bridging the practice, teaching, and critical interpretation of architecture. Currently she is engaged in post-doctoral research and Habilitation project at the gta Chair for the History of Urban Design, ETH Zurich, studying the autonomy and integration of high-density housing estates in the European city. Niall McLaughlin Niall McLaughlin was born in Geneva in 1962. He was educated in Dublin and received his architectural qualifications from University College Dublin in 1984. He worked for Scott Tallon Walker in Dublin and London between 1984 and 1989. He established his own practice in London in 1990. Niall McLaughlin Architects makes high quality modern buildings with a special emphasis on materials and detail. McLaughlin won Young British Architect of the Year in 1998, he was one of the BBC Rising Stars in 2001, and his work represented Britain in a US exhibition Gritty Brits at the Carnegie Mellon Museum. His designs have won many awards in the UK, Ireland, and the USA, including RIAI Best Building in the Landscape and the RIBA Stephen Lawrence Award for the Best Building under £1million and was on the RIBA Stirling Shortlist 2013 and 2015. McLaughlin is a professor of architecture at University College London as well as a visiting professor at the University of California Los Angeles from 2012 to 2013 and appointed Lord Norman Foster Visiting Professor of Architecture, Yale for 2014–2015. He was chair of the RIBA Awards Group from 2007 to 2009. He lives in London with his wife Mary, son Diarmaid, and daughter Iseult.
Bearth & Deplazes Valentin Bearth (1957) studied at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH) and received his degree in 1983 under Prof. Dolf Schnebli. Between 1984 and 1988 he was employed at Atelier Peter Zumthor. In 1988, Bearth established an office with Andrea Deplazes. Since 2000, Bearth has been a design professor at the Accademia di Architettura of the Università della Svizzera Italiana in Mendrisio and between 2007 and 2011 Bearth was the director of the school. Andrea Deplazes (1960) studied at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH) and received his degree in 1988 under Prof. Fabio Reinhardt. In 1988, Deplazes established an office with Valentin Bearth. Since 1997 he has been professor for architecture and construction at the Department of Architecture at the ETH in Zurich and between 2005 and 2007 was the head of the Department of Architecture at the ETH. Daniel Ladner (1959) did an apprenticeship as a mason and was trained as a draftsman specializing in structural engineering. In 1988 Ladner graduated from the Abendtechnikum HTL in Chur. Between 1989 and 1994 Ladner was employed at Bearth & Deplazes and from 1995 to 2000 was a partner there. Since 2001, Landner shares the office with Bearth & Deplazes. During the past two decades, the office has been awarded numerous prizes, including, in 1999, the 6th Mies van der Rohe Award, an international award for European architecture; in 2008, the Balthasar Neumann Prize and the Holcim Bronze Award Europe for Monte-Rosa Hut; and in 2010 the Swiss Solar Prize for their winery Gantenbein. Buchner Bründler Buchner Bründler was founded by Daniel Buchner and Andreas Bründler in Basel in 1997. The firm is composed of a team of about thirty architects, interior designers, and designers. Activities include urban planning and development, realization of public buildings, residential, and service buildings, as well as interior design in Switzerland and abroad. Context and space play a central role in their work, which is characterized by a continuous study of and experimentation with form, light, materiality, and color. Their projects are designed taking into account the specific location and concepts involved. Realization follows intensive discourse with the clients and future users. The firm is also renowned for their work in a larger urban development context. Projects outside Switzerland are an increasing source of work for the firm. The renovation of the GA-200 rooms in the UN headquarters in New York was completed in 2003, and subsequently presented to the UN as a gift from Switzerland. After successful completion of a pavilion in the Jinhua Architecture Park in China, the Swiss pavilion at the Shanghai World Expo was completed in 2010. Projects designed and executed by Buchner Bründler have been awarded numerous prizes and published in national and international architecture journals. In 2003, the firm received one of the most important Swiss cultural awards, the Swiss Art Award in Architecture and, in 2013, the Beton 13 prize for Casa d’Estate Linescio and Bläsiring House. The architects have devoted themselves to teaching and research and give lectures in Switzerland and abroad on a regular basis. They taught at the EPF Lausanne from 2007 to 2009 and have been active as design lecturers at the ETH Zurich since 2010. Gion A. Caminada Gion A. Caminada works as an architect in Vrin, Graubünden. After his apprenticeship as a carpenter, he attended the School of Applied Art in Zurich. Subsequently, he completed his postgraduate degree in architecture at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH). Since 2008, Caminada has also been professor of architecture at the ETH in Zurich. Jürg Conzett Citizen of Schiers (Graubünden), Jürg Conzett (1956) studied civil engineering at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH) in Lausanne and Zurich and received his diploma in 1980. From 1981 until 1988 he worked as an employee of architect Peter Zumthor in Haldenstein. After this architectural experience he decided to start working as an independent consultant structural engineer. Today he heads an engineer’s office of about 25 people together with his partners Gianfranco Bronzini and Patrick Gartmann in Chur. Their main activities are designing structures for buildings together with architects, as well as working on projects for bridges and bridge repairs. Conzett taught structures at the Fachhochschule Chur for about 20 years. In 2011, he had a three-month tenure teaching at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University.
Diener & Diener The architecture office Marcus Diener Architect (founded in 1942), changed its name to Diener & Diener in 1980. Today Diener & Diener has offices in Basel and Berlin. Along with its subsidiary in Berlin, the Basel office has been headed by Roger Diener, together with Terese Erngaard, Andreas Rüedi, and Michael Roth who have been partners since 2011. Originally focusing on residential projects, the firm now also systematically develops urban-planning projects, as well as projects for the renovation and extension of historic buildings. The basis of their designs is a perception of the European city in all its variety and continuity. During the past 15 years, several projects have been developed on the basis of a consistent cooperation with artists—for instance the Novartis Headquarters in Basel with Helmut Federle. Recent projects include the reconstruction of the east wing of the Museum of Natural History at Humboldt University, Berlin, and the Mémorial de la Shoah in Drancy, Paris. In 1976, the Basel architect Roger Diener (1950) graduated from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH) and joined the firm Marcus Diener Architect, the practice his father had founded in Basel in 1942. He was made partner in 1980. In 1987–1989 Roger Diener was a professor at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL). He has been a professor at the ETH, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (Studio Basel) since 1999. The Académie d’Architecture in Paris honored his work with the Grande Médaille d’Or in 2002. He was awarded the Prix Meret Oppenheim in 2009. In 2011 Diener was awarded the Heinrich Tessenow Gold Medal. EM2N Mathias Müller (1966) and Daniel Niggli (1970) studied architecture together at the ETH in Zurich. Their office, EM2N, was established in Zurich in 1997 and is currently based in Zurich and Berlin. With their 75 employees, they work on construction and competition projects in Switzerland and abroad. In addition to numerous other prizes, including the price RegardsSguardi, EM2N received the Swiss Art Prize for Architecture in 2004. Müller and Niggli have been guest professors at the ETH Lausanne and the ETH Zurich and are also members of the Building Councils of Berlin and Zurich. Andreas Fuhrimann Gabrielle Hächler Gabrielle Hächler (1958) studied art history at Zurich University and architecture at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH), receiving her degree in 1988. Hächler was employed for four years as assistant lecturer in the Department of Construction at the ETH Zurich. She established her own architectural office in 1988 and, since 1995, has been in partnership with Andreas Fuhrimann. Between 2009 and 2011 she was visiting professor at the ETH Zurich and, from 2012 to 2014, professor at UdK Berlin. Andreas Fuhrimann (1956) studied physics and architecture at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH), receiving his architecture degree in 1985. After a year in the architectural office Marbach + Rüegg, Fuhrimann collaborated with Christian Karrer from 1987. In 1988 he lectured interior architecture at the School of Design and Crafts. He established an office with Gabrielle Hächler in 1995. Between 2009 and 2011 Fuhrimann was visiting professor at the ETH Zurich and, from 2012 to 2014, professor at UdK Berlin. Carlo Fumarola (1978) studied architecture at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH), receiving his architecture degree in 2005. Since 2005, Fumarola has been employed at Andreas Fuhrimann Gabrielle Hächler. Between 2009 and 2011 he was assistant lecturer at the ETH and since 2012 has been a partner at Andreas Fuhrimann Gabrielle Hächler. Gilbert Isermann (1978) studied architecture at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH), receiving his architecture degree in 2004. From 2004 to 2007 Isermann was employed at Gigon Guyer Architekten and since 2007 he has been employed at Andreas Fuhrimann Gabrielle Hächler, becoming a partner in 2012.
Herzog & de Meuron Herzog & de Meuron is a partnership led by Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron together with three senior partners: Christine Binswanger, Ascan Mergenthaler, and Stefan Marbach. Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron established their office in Basel in 1978. The partnership has grown over the years— Christine Binswanger joined the practice as partner in 1994, followed by Robert Hösl and Ascan Mergenthaler in 2004, Stefan Marbach in 2006, Esther Zumsteg in 2009, Andreas Fries in 2011, Jason Frantzen and Wim Walschap in 2014, and Michael Fischer in 2016. An international team of about 40 associates and 380 collaborators is working on projects across Europe, the Americas, and Asia. The firm’s main office is in Basel with additional offices in Hamburg, London, New York City, and Hong Kong. Herzog & de Meuron has designed a wide range of projects from the small scale of a private home to the large scale of urban design. While many of their projects are highly recognized public facilities, such as their stadiums and museums, they have also completed several distinguished private projects including apartment buildings, offices, and factories. The practice has been awarded numerous prizes including The Pritzker Architecture Prize (USA) in 2001, the RIBA Royal Gold Medal (UK) and the Praemium Imperiale (Japan), both in 2007. In 2014, Herzog & de Meuron were awarded the Mies Crown Hall Americas Prize (MCHAP). Miller & Maranta Quintus Miller (1961) studied architecture at the ETH Zurich; receiving his degree in 1987. From 1990 to 1994 Miller was design assistant at the EPF Lausanne and at the ETH Zurich. In 1994, he established his own office in Basel, Miller & Maranta, with Paola Maranta. From 2000 to 2001, Miller was visiting professor at EPF Lausanne and from 2007 to 2008 he was guest professor at the Accademia di Architettura of the Università della Svizzera Italiana in Mendrisio. From 2008 to 2010 he was visiting professor at the ETH Zurich. Since 2009, Miller has been full professor for architecture at the Accademia di Architettura of the Università della Svizzera Italiana in Mendrisio. From 2004 to 2008, Miller was a member of the commission for urban planning and architecture of Lucerne, as well as on the commission for visual arts in Riehen. Since 2005, Miller has been active in the commission for historic preservation of the cities Zurich and Basel. Paola Maranta (1959) studied architecture at the EPF Lausanne and at the ETH Zurich graduating in 1986. In 1990, Maranta completed a Master of Business Administration at the IMD in Lausanne. From 1991 to 1994 she was a management consultant in Zurich and in 2000 to 2001 visiting professor at EPF Lausanne. In 1994, she established Miller & Maranta with Quintus Miller in Basel. From 2007 to 2008 she was visiting professor at the Accademia di Architettura of the Università della Svizzera Italiana, Mendrisio and from 2008 to 2010 she was guest professor at the ETH Zurich. From 2001 to 2005 Maranta was a member of the commission for urban planning and architecture Basel and since 2003 she has been a member of the city commission in Riehen near Basel. Jean-Luc von Aarburg (1975) studied architecture at the EPF Lausanne, the TU Delft, and the ETH Zurich. Since his graduation in 2001, von Aarburg has been collaborating with Miller & Maranta. In 2013 he became a partner at Miller & Maranta. Von Aarburg was guest professor at the ETH Zurich in 2010. :mlzd Partners: Claude Marbach, Pat Tanner, Daniele Di Giacinto, David Locher, Andreas Frank. :mlzd was established in Biel/Bienne in 1997. It is the workplace of a versatile team of architects, who have to date won more than 30 first prizes in international competitions and have more than 40 completed building projects to their name. The work of the practice covers a broad spectrum. Its most important projects include the renovation of the presidential anterooms to the United Nations General Assembly Hall in New York (2004), as well as extensions to the History Museum in Bern (2009) and the Local-Heritage Museum in Rapperswil (2011). :mlzd currently has 30 employees, whose internal discussions give rise to vastly varied projects. One characteristic that all the projects have in common, however, is the self-assured and highly respectful attitude towards the architectural setting and their love of detail.
Nickisch Walder Selina Walder studied her diploma at the Accademia di Architettura Mendrisio under Valerio Olgiati in 2004. From 2004 to 2006 she taught as an assistant at his chair for architectural design. Since 2004, she has been working independently in her own office in Flims—since 2005 with Georg Nickisch. In 2009/ 2010 Walder curated the exhibition “DADO—Built and Inhabited by Rudolf Olgiati and Valerio Olgiati.” Georg Nickisch studied at the Prince of Wales Institute of Architecture (UK), the University of Bath (UK) and studied his degree in architecture at the Accademia di Architettura Mendrisio under Peter Zumthor in 2005. Between 2007 and 2013, he taught as an assistant at the chair of Jonathan Sergison (Sergison Bates Architects). In 2008 Selina Walder and Georg Nickisch won the competition for the new auditorium building at the Plantahof Landquart in collaboration with Valerio Olgiati. In 2010 they won the first prize in a competition for an apartment building and the refurbishment of a heritage-protected farmhouse in Davos. In the same year they won a private competition for a villa situated in Thurgau. In 2011, Nickisch Walder was awarded the second prize in an open competition for the chancellery of the Swiss embassy in Nairobi. Valerio Olgiati Valerio Olgiati (1958) studied architecture at the ETH Zurich. Having lived and worked first in Zurich and later in Los Angeles for some years, he opened his own practice in Zurich in 1996 and then, in 2008, together with his wife, Tamara, in Flims. Olgiati initially received international attention in 1999 with his museum project, The Yellow House in Flims, Switzerland. He created an icon with his 2008 competition-winning entry for the Museum of Contemporary Art in Perm, Russia. Olgiati’s most important buildings include the schoolhouse in Paspels, the museum The Yellow House in Flims, the House for a Musician in Scharans, the residential complex Schleife in Zug, and Villa Além in Alentejo. Major projects in planning are the winery for Carnasciale in Italy, the high-rise building San Felipe in Lima, a house for a priest in Bavaria, and a building for the headquarters of Baloise insurance company in Basel. There are numerous monographs about his oeuvre. A major solo exhibition of his work took place 2012 at MoMa Tokyo. Among other academic engagements he led the Kenzo Tange Chair at Harvard University in 2009. Since 2002, Olgiati has been a full Professor at the Accademia di Architettura Mendrisio at the Università della Svizzera Italiana. Savioz Fabrizzi Savioz Fabrizzi was founded in 2004 by architects Laurent Savioz (1976) and Claude Fabrizzi (1975). The office provides all architectural services from design through to realization. Their approach is based on the analysis of a site in its natural or built state to identify the essential elements to enhance or preserve it. In this way they believe they can strengthen the cultural role of architecture based on the analysis of function, program, place in history, and the culture of a region. Studio Vacchini Eloisa Vacchini is associate architect at Studio Vacchini. She received her architecture degree from Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne in 1997. Employed at various architectural practices in Sydney, Australia (1994–1995). Worked at Daniel D’Andrea Architects in Buenos Aires, Argentina (1998–1999). Here Vacchini focused on a commission to refurbish buildings in Havana at the invitation of the Cuban government. Between 1999 and 2007, Vacchini was employed at the Studio di architettura Livio Vacchini based in Locarno. In April 2007, she became an associate architect at Studio Vacchini. Peter Zumthor Peter Zumthor was born in Basel in 1943 and grew up in Oberwil, Baselland. Between 1958 and 1962 he trained as cabinetmaker at the workshop of his father, Oscar Zumthor. From 1963 to 1967 he studied design and architecture at the Kunstgewerbeschule Basel, as well as at the Pratt Institute, New York. From 1967, Zumthor was employed as building and planning consultant and documenter of historical villages with the Department for the Preservation of Monuments, Canton of Graubünden in Switzerland. In addition he realized various renovations. In 1978, Zumthor established his own architectural practice in Haldenstein, Switzerland. He was visiting professor at Southern California Institute of Architecture, SCI-Arc, Los Angeles (1988); at the Technische Universität Munich (1989) and at the Graduate School of Design, Harvard University (1999). Between 1996 and 2008 Zumthor was professor at the Accademia di Architettura, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Mendrisio. Selection of Zumthor’s many awards: Mies van der Rohe Award for European Architecture, Barcelona (1998); Prix Meret Oppenheim, Switzerland (2006); Praemium Imperiale, Japan Art Association (2008); The Pritzker Architecture Prize, The Hyatt Foundation (2009); RIBA Royal Gold Medal, Royal Institute of British Architects (2013); Nike, Architecture Prize, Bund Deutscher Architekten BDA (2013)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks for the support and encouragement of: Peter Zumthor, Ralf Daab, Alexander Felix, Katharina Kulke, Res Eichenberger, Adriano Biondo, Andri Pol, Sylwia Chomentowska, Olga Funk, Quintus Miller, Jørg Himmelreich, Jean-Paul Jaccaud, Irina Davidovici, Niall McLaughlin, James Breiding, Gaudenz Danuser, Wilfried Dechau, Matthieu Gafsou, Michael Hanak, Hugo Bütler, Elena Pascolo, Stephen Gelb, David Best, Melanie Best, Magriet Cruywagen, Ernst Steinmann, Mascia Buzzolini, Bruno Tobler (Foto Vision), Marianne Gauer, Peter Dömötör, Petra Küchler, Nicky Boustred, Tkalcec Hrvoje, and especially to Louise and Conal Gain for their help and support with copyediting and to my husband, Hendrik, who has shared this long journey with me. Finally, thank you also to all the architects and photographers whose valuable contribution made this publication possible.
PHOTO CREDITS Tonatiuh Ambrosetti 191–194, 201–204 Adriano Biondo 5, 25, 53, 121, 219 Iwan Baan 61, 64 (top) Hélène Binet 123, 132 Markus Bühler-Rasom 62, 63, 64 (bottom) Gaudenz Danuser 81, 83–88, 91– 93, 94 (bottom) Wilfried Dechau 113, 115, 116 Lucia Degonda 105 –109 Federal Office of Topography swisstopo front endpaper Ralph Feiner 94 (top), 209 Leonardo Finotti 55, 56 Roger Frei 231, 232, 233, 234 (top) Matthieu Gafsou 1, 247 Alexander Gempeler 211– 214 Christian Grund 143 Maurice Haas 189, 229 Thomas Jantscher 45–149, 153–158 Valentin Jeck 163 –166 Alexandre Kapellos 221 Antonio Martinelli 130, 131 Simon Menges 234 (bottom) Giuseppe Micciché 27, 28, 30, 42– 44 Archive Olgiati 173–175, 180 –182 Andri Pol 99, 161 Stephan Rappo 171 Christian Richters 73–76 Hendrik Roos 124, 125, 129 René Rötheli 222, 223, 224 Ruedi Walti 7–12, 17–20, 29, 33–36, 41 Dominique Marc Wehrli 179 Swiss map and all architectural plans orientated with North point vertically up.
BIBLIOGRAPHY Angélil, Marc, and Himmelreich, Jørg eds. Architecture Dialogues: Positions—Concepts—Visions. Zurich: Braun Publishers, 2012. Architekturpreis Beton 05. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2005. Architekturpreis Beton 09. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2009. Architekturpreis Beton 13. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2013. archithese, Zurich, Nr. 1, 2014, 86– 87: “Grauer Aal statt Ruderal.” Breiding, R. James. Swiss Made. The Untold Story Behind Switzerland’s Success London. Profile Books, 2013, 312– 329. Bürkle, J. Christoph, ed. Swiss Performance 11. archithese. Zurich, 2011, 60–63. Caviezel, Nott. “Eine Zeitreise.” In werk, bauen + wohnen, Zurich, Nr. 11, 2004, 46–51. Caviezel, Nott. “Am alten Viehmarkt.” In werk, bauen + wohnen, Zurich, Nr. 6, 2008, 58. Davidovici, Irina. Forms of Practice, German-Swiss Architecture 1980–2000. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2012. DETAIL, Institut für Internationale Architektur-Dokumentation, Munich, Nr. 6, 2014, 586–590: “Summer House in Linescio.” Diener, Roger, Jacques Herzog, Marcel Meili, Pierre de Meuron, and Christian Schmid. Switzerland: An Urban Portrait. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 2006. Durisch, Thomas, ed. Peter Zumthor: Buildings and Projects 1985–2013. Zurich: Scheidegger and Spiess, 2014. ETH Zurich ed, Neue Monte-Rosa-Hütte SAC. Ein autarkes Bauwerk im hochalpinen Raum. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2010. Feusi, Alois. “Der Fluch des Erfolgs.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 20. 09. 2011. Foxley, Alice. Distance & Engagement. Baden: Lars Müller Publishers, 2010. Gadola, Reto. Architektur der Sehnsucht: 20 Schweizer Ferienhäuser aus dem 20. Jahrhundert. Zurich: gta Verlag, 2013. Haefeli, Rebekka. “Mehr als nur ein Dach über dem Kopf.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 26. 09. 2014. Hägele, Steffen. “Massiver Erhalt, Hütte und Ferienwohnung in Flims.” In archithese, Zurich, Nr. 1, 2013, 76–78. Hanak, Michael, ed. Umbau des Hospizes auf dem Gotthardpass durch Miller & Maranta. Zurich: Park Books, 2012. Hollenstein, Roman. “Baukünstlerische Essenzen.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 15.10. 2010. Hollenstein, Roman. “Alpiner Urbanismus.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 03. 06. 2005. Hubertus, Adam. “Alpine Architektur heute.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 23. 09. 2009. Hubertus, Adam. “Hausförmige Hofmauern.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 26.11. 2007. Jodidio, Philip. Architecture in Switzerland. Berlin: Taschen, 2006. Mayer, Hannes, Florian Dreher, Katharina Sommer, and Paula Strunden. Swiss Performance 14. archithese. Zurich, 2014, 16–21, 86–87. Moore, Rowan. “Herzog and de Meuron: Tate Modern’s architects on their radical new extension.” In The Guardian Observer Magazine. London, 15. 05. 2016. Roos, Anna. “Kristall Kubus—Zwischen Schloss und Hof.” In Ensuite Kulturmagazin, Bern, March 2014, 20. Roos, Anna. “Open and closed.” In A10 New European architecture, Nr. 57, Amsterdam, 2014, 7. Roos, Anna. “Refugi Lieptgas.” In A10 New European architecture, Nr. 59, Amsterdam, 2014, 8. Roos, Anna. “One with the trees.” In A10 New European architecture, Nr. 60, Amsterdam, 2014, 54. Schoper, Tom. “Die Erfahrung von Atmosphäre.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 26. 08. 2013. Spier, Steven. Swiss Made, New Architecture from Switzerland. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 2003. Structural Engineering International, Zurich, Nr. 2. 1997, 92– 94: “The Traversina Footbridge, Switzerland.” Tietz, Jürgen. “Bewahren und Verändern.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 31. 07. 2010. Wainwright, Oliver. http://www.oliverwainwright.co.uk/2009/06/ valerio-olgiati.html. 01. 06. 2009. Wefing, Heinrich. “Nichts als Wasser, Licht und Stein.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 22. 03. 2009. Windhöfel, Lutz. “Die Fassade als Aquarell.” In Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zurich, 14. 06. 2005. Zumthor, Peter. Thinking Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 2010. Zumthor, Peter. Atmospheres. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 2006.
SWISS SENSIBILITY The Culture of Architecture in Switzerland Anna Roos Copy editing: Louise Gain Project management: Alexander Felix, Katharina Kulke Design, typesetting: Res Eichenberger Design, Zurich Production: Heike Strempel Paper: Munken Lynx Rough 120 g/m² Printing: DZA Druckerei zu Altenburg GmbH Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the German National Library The German National Library lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in databases. For any kind of use, permission of the copyright owner must be obtained. This publication is also available as an e-book (ISBN PDF 978-3-0356-0922-6) and in a German language edition (ISBN 978-3-0356-1130-4) and in a French language edition (ISBN 978-3-0356-1131-1) © 2017 Birkhäuser Verlag GmbH, Basel P. O. Box 44, 4009 Basel, Switzerland Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printed on acid-free paper produced from chlorine-free pulp. TCF ∞ Printed in Germany ISBN 978-3-0356-1128-1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 www.birkhauser.com
Supported by