Similarity of matrices over a ring

I n t r o d u c t i o n ................. 1 Chapter 1: The Module Associated to a Matrix ........... 11 1. Definition of

285 54 3MB

English Pages [106] Year 1978

Report DMCA / Copyright

DOWNLOAD PDF FILE

Recommend Papers

Similarity of matrices over a ring

  • 0 0 0
  • Like this paper and download? You can publish your own PDF file online for free in a few minutes! Sign Up
File loading please wait...
Citation preview

INFORMATION TO USERS

This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find ja good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is o f greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding o f the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: received.

Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as

University M icrofilm s International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St. John’s Road, Tyler’s Green High Wycombe, Bucks, England HP10 8HR

7 90 33 E 2 MCMAHON* E D I T H MARY S I M I L A R I T Y OF M A T R I C E S NORTHWESTERN

OVER

UNIVERSITY,

University Microfilms International

300 n . z e e b r o a o , a n n a r b o r , mi 4 8 io 6

A RING.

PH.D.,

1973

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY

S I M I L A R I T Y OF M A T R I C E S O V E R A RING

A DISSERTATION S U B M I T T E D TO THE

GRADUATE

SCHOOL

IN P A R T I A L F U L F I L L M E N T OF THE R E Q U I R E M E N T S for the d e g r e e D O C T O R OF P H I L O S O P H Y F i e l d of M a t h e m a t i c s

By Edith Mary McMahon

Eva ns to n, June,

Ill ino is 1978

T a b l e of C o nt en ts Page I n t r o d u c t i o n ................. Chapter

1:

1 to a M a t r i x ...........

The M o d u l e A s s o c i a t e d

1.

D e f i n i t i o n of

the M o d u l e .........................

2.

The A n n i h i l a t o r

3.

Similarity

of

M

of M a t r i c e s

in

R [ A ] ................

and

Isomorphism

of M o d u l e s .......................................... 4. Chapter

Properties 2:

of the R in gs

Lattices

Ov e r O r d e r s

1.

Definitions

2.

The Jordan-Zassenhaus

3. Chapter

and

A

.........

...............

Re sul ts

11 12

17 19 25

..................

25

C o n d i t i o n ..... ...........

27

G e n e r a o f L a t t i c e s .................................

33

3:

40

The

and B a si c

A

11

Latimer-MacDuffee Correspondence

. . .

1.

T h e C l a s s i c a l M e t h o d ..............................

40

2.

The Relationship

47

Chapter 1.

4:

of M o d u l e s

Block Triangular

Transforming

Form.

a Matrix

and

Ideals. . . .

.......................

into B l o c k T r i a n g u l a r

F o r m ................................................. 2.

Similarity

of M a t r i c e s

5:

Determination

of S i m i l a r i t y .................. i

53

in B l o c k T r i a n g u l a r

F o r m .................................................. Chapter

53

63 69

Page 1.

Introductory

2.

Form

1:

R e m a r k s ...........................

£( X)has d i s t i n c t

.

69

irreducible

f a c t o r s .................................................. 69 3.

F o r m 2: same,

All f(A)

the

roots

of

the

(A - a ) n

.............................. 71 - a) ,and

Fo rm

3:

f(A)

= g(A)(A

5.

Form

4:

f(A)

= g(A )h( A) and

6.

are

=

4.

degree 2

f(A)

g(a)

h(A)

^ 0

.

81

has

............................................... 85

S u m m a r y .................................................. 93

B i b l i o g r a p h y ....................................................... 98 V i t a ................................................................ 101

ii

INTRODUCTION

T he p u r p o s e aspects We

of this

of s i m i l a r i t y

first

dissertation

of s q u a r e m a t r i c e s

di s c u s s

the n u m b e r

w h e n this n u m b e r

is finite.

We then

whether

A'

R

whether that

similar th er e

AP

e x is ts

= PA'

approaches

to

over

.

.

a ring

turn to the

Th a t

is,

R

specific A

and

we w i s h to d e t e r m i n e P

ov er

R

fi rst d e s c r i b e our m e t h o d s

the se p r o b l e m s ,

.

shox^ing

two squ ar e m a t r i c e s ,

an i n v e r t i b l e m a t r i x

We wi l l

over

two

of s i m i l a r i t y cl as se s,

p r o b l e m of d e t e r m i n i n g , are

is to s tu dy

suc h and

and then m a k e a c o m p a r i s o n of

our w o r k w i t h r e s u l t s p r e v i o u s l y o b t a i n e d by others. The

first

two c h a p t e r s

determining when

the n u m b e r of s i m i l a r i t y cl as s e s

We b e g i n by c o n s i d e r i n g with

identity.

ea c h e l e m e n t elements Ma

in

from R [A ]

therefore of

A

, we

We A

of R

is

.

Rn

an R [A ] -module,

,the ri ng

After proving

the nu l l ideal

M

We n o t e

finitely generated

of that

of the

n x n

Ma

ring,

that,

by its

important

R

,

, with

the a n n i h i l a t o r of matrix

A

and f(A)

as a A = R [A ] / (f (X) ) - m o d u l e

A-module which be

is finite.

matrices with

the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c p o l y n o m i a l ,

consider

a fact w h i c h wi l l

an a r b i t r a r y c o m m u t a t i v e

associate

contains

ob v i o u s way.

are p r i m a r i l y c o n c e r n e d w i t h

construction,

MA

,

in the is a

is free as an R - m o du l e ,

in the sec on d cha pter.

2

A necessary of

Rn

to be

condition

similar

teristic polynomial, MA

a nd

prove ,

Mg

is that

they have

f(A)

Thus,

re s p e c t i v e l y ,

in T h e o r e m 1.5,

if and onl y T he re su l t s

if th ei r

.

the

also

consider

to tal

subring the

quotient

of

A

in t e g r a l

integral

c h a p t e r pr e s e n t s

up

of

a p p r o a c h we

orders.

An

containing

Q

.

We

and

R-order

in

in

A A

A

order

a n d that

A

of

in Rn

A .

of m a tri x.

, where A

ov e r

R

in cl u d e

Q

is

is a .

is sho wn to be

Further, the

to be a s e p ar ab le Q - a l g e b r a .

a s s o c i a t e d to m a t r i ce s.

is a D e d e k i n d d o m a i n w i t h

A

is a f i n i t e - d i m e n s i o n a l

is to use S

in

A

is a su br in g

su ch that

an R-module. MA

Q-algebra.

the t h e o r y of la t t i c e s

is an S - m o d u l e w h i c h as

ideal

and

. We give n e c e s s a r y and

g e n e r a t e d R - m o d u l e w h i c h co n t a i n s

torsion-free

We

R

the id en ti ty ,

S -lattice

similar

definitions

show that

R

of the A - m o d u l e s

take

are

is c o n c e r n e d w i t h the c l a s s i f i c a t i o n ,

the c h a p t e r

fie ld

R

is in te g r a l

for

second chapter

to i s o m o r p h i s m ,

quotient

A

the null

A

of

conditions

Throughout

The

closure

W e then

to in lat er chapters.

ring of

,

are A - i s o m o r p h i c .

A = Q[A ]/ (f (A ))

a n d that

closure

sufficient The

the ring

B

the same c h a r a c ­

two such m a t r i c e s

a d i s c u s s i o n of h o w to d e t e r m i n e We

and

the a s s o c i a t e d m o d u l e s ,

associated modules

referred

A

are bo t h A-modu le s.

that

rest of the first w h i c h are

for two ma tr ice s,

We

S

of

A

over

,

is a f i n i t e l y

a Q-basis

of

A

.

is f i n i t e l y g e n e r a t e d sh ow that

is a A - l a t t i c e

A

An and

is an R-

for a ny

el e m e n t

Historically, content

of a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r

r i n g of r a t i o n a l O'

, of the

number

0

of the

Dedekind

it to be

A 1

, was

i n te ge rs

st ud i e d

in the

-order,

d e f i n e d to be a s u br in g 0

studied

of an a l g e b r a i c the

and a m u l t i p l e

t h e o r y of l a t t i c e s

in r e p r e s e n t a t i o n as we l l

as

group

ri n g

RH

theory.

Curtis

to r e p r e s e n t a t i o n

ideal of the

cl as s of

o v e r or de r s Roggenkamp

and Reiner

theory.

has

H

is an R - o r d e r

in

also be e n used

and H u b e r - D y s o n

[6 ] stress

If

This

subject

ment

for the s p e c i a l

survey

[24].

is d e v e l o p e d

of i n t e g r a l

In this case,

matrices

and

an

in

this

is a finite QH

[6 ],

case w h e n

.

we

integral

1

representation

then

group,

[22].

Thus,

of s i m i l a r i t y c l a s s e s

F r o m our w o r k

in C h a p t e r

of

is g i v e n

H

in

t h e o r y can be relationship

and

If

the

.

f(A)

~J_ [0 ] . defines

f(A)

[29]. fo un d

in

between is an

is a root of

0

su c h that of

P _1A P

irreducible representations number

A

representation

invertible matrix,

R = 1

[X]

approach

E a c h R H - l a t t i c e wil

representations. in

[25,

s u m m a r y of the d e v e l o p

see a d i r e c t

= 0 , th e n e a c h m a t r i x

irreducible

A

representation

irreducible polynomial f(A)

O'

class n u m b e r

a f f o r d a set of R - e q u i v a l e n t R - r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s

A

for the

. The

26]

/

[7]

finite

first

theory.

integers,

rings

field.

showing of

R-orders were

If

= 0 P

define

is an

an e q u i v a l e n t

the n u m b e r of i n e q u i v a l e n t of

~][ [0 ]

is the

same as the

of m a t r i x ro ot s of

1, we k n o w this

f(A)

= 0

to be the n u m b e r

.

of i s o m o r p h i s m c la ss es ciated

s h o w that this n u m b e r

of A - l a t t i c e s quotient

integral

finite when Q

is a g l ob a l

as s t a t e d

asso­

in

[23],

f i el d and that

holds

R

in

A

f(A)

.

a separable

for A - l a t t i c e s , in

we

A

using

is the

s h o w that the

of m a t r i c e s w i t h c h a r a c t e r i s t i c

approach

to

the q u e s t i o n of the n u m b e r of

of A - l a t t i c e s

finite

Th e n u m b e r of c l a s s e s

and can be g i v e n

class n u m b e r of a m a x i m a l

R-orde r.

as

th e y a p p l y to the A - l a t t i c e s

We

t h e n use

these

is g i v e n by J a c o b i n s k i

the c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of A - l a t t i c e s

a n d r e s t r i c t e d genera.

results

matrices

are s i m i l a r

lattices

are

in terms

of

We p r e s e n t

the

into

is ideal

these results

a s s o c i a t e d to m a t r i c e s .

in an e x a m p l e

if a n d o n l y

sh o w i n g w h e n

two

if t h e i r a s s o c i a t e d A-

in the sa m e genus.

W e n o w turn given matrices the thesis,

is

is finite.

He d e v e l o p s

s h o w n to be

A

the J o r d a n - Z a s s e n h a u s

Thus,

of

isomorphism classes

to the p r o b l e m of d e t e r m i n i n g w h e t h e r

ar e similar.

we a s s u m e that

an a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r insuring

is a D e d e k i n d d o m a i n w h o s e

closure

of s i m i l a r i t y c l a s s e s

[10,11].

of i s o m o r p h i s m c l a s s e s

R-order

A different

cular

la t t i c e s

that the u n i q u e m a x i m a l

polynomial

genera

R

We do this by s h o w i n g

condition, fact

is

field

Q-a lg e b r a .

number

~jj [A]/(f(A))

to such m a t r i c e s .

W e will

the

of

unique

Throughout R

f ie ld w i t h

factorization.

situation depends

on the

this p o r t i o n

of

is the ring of i n t e g e r s c la ss n u m b e r one, The m e t h o d u s e d

two

of

thus in a p a r t i ­

fo r m of the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c

5

polynomial wil l

f(A)

tell us A

fa ct o rs

of f(A)

is

have

o f classes.

ideal w i t h a nd onl y T he

s p ec ia l

fa ct or s w i t h ea c h matrix .

3.

ba sis T he

for

polynomial, ~]L [C]

,

, where

Taussky

[30]

C

of

specializes

f(A)

ciated

to the m a t r i x

the ring of in t e g e r s number

one.

ideals

resulting

in f i n i t e this

distinct

are

then are

correspondence

In

an

similar

if

in the same class. is p r e s e n t e d

are g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s [15]

f(A) ideals

as

they

establish

in the ring of p o l y n o m i a l s

In this

the m o r e

out

of

characteristic

case,

ge ne r a l

f(A) to the the

. case

ideal

asso­

We p r e s e n t

case w h e n

of an a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r

R

is

fi el d of class

the c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n

from the L a t i m e r - M a c D u f f e e defined

Q-algebra

, we can a s s o c i a t e

the c o r r e s p o n d e n c e

We also p o i n t

a nd the m o d u l e s

or has

is s p e c i f i c a l l y de scr ibe d. for

irreducible

between similarity classes

is irr edu ci bl e.

re su lt s

and

illustrates

is the c o m p a n i o n m a t r i x of

\\rhere

all of th ese

R

g i v e n th ere

w h i c h hav e

and cl a s s e s

R[A]

5.

of L a t i m e r an d Ma cD u f f e e .

in

the

a separable

case w h i c h

ideals

re s u l t s

= 0

we m a y have an

over

this

f(A)

in

of s i m i l a r i t y classes.

The matrices

a one-to-one correspondence matrices

is

f(0) f 0

if the a s s o c i a t e d

in C h a p t e r

A

in C h a p t e r

is i r r e d u c i b l e

theoretical

of th ose

A

of

f(A)

n o t e that w h e n

are not d i s t i n c t ,

in d e ta il

f(A)

We

a fini te n u m b e r

number

is d i s c u s s e d

of the roots

are di st in ct ,

fa ct or s

irreducible

f a c t o r i z a t i o n of

separa b le.

If the

If

The

the n a t u r e

whether

and we wi l l

.

in C h a p t e r

1.

We

correspondence

show

that

an

6

ideal

associated

A-homomorphism matrix

of

to the m a t r i x

fr o m

f(A)

MA

to

A

*MC

will where

case w h e n integers This

to the ca s e w h e n

of an a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r

polynomial

the m a i n d i a g o n a l wi l l

matrices

R

[20]

is the

f r o m the ring of

fi el d w i t h class n u m b e r

m a y be t r a n s f o r m e d

along

zeroes

has r e p e a t e d

f(A)

in b l o c k t r i a n g u l a r

be

companion

that e v e r y m a t r i x w i t h c h a r a c t e r i s t i c

is

f (A )

the

shows

which

of

f(A)

first g e n e r a l i z e a r e s u l t of

R = ]J_

result

is

4 w e p r e s e n t an a p p r o a c h to the q u e s t i o n of

s i m i l a r i t y w h i c h m a y be u s e d w h e n We

C

to a

.

In C h a p t e r

factors.

correspond

as its

form.

into a s i m i l a r m a t r i x Th a t

is,

characteristic polynomial,

form,

reduced

the

given

the q u e s t i o n of to a c o n s i d e r a t i o n of

the s i m i l a r i t y of c o r r e s p o n d i n g blocks. exactly how a matrix

fa ct o r

a n d t h er e wi ll

By t r a n s f o r m i n g

into b l o c k t r i a n g u l a r

s i m i l a r i t y can be p a r t i a l l y

ea c h b l o c k

have an i r r e d u c i b l e

b e l o w these blocks.

one.

We also

ca n be t r a n s f o r m e d

specify

into b l o c k t r i ­

a n g u l a r form. Using

this

two m a t r i c e s , similar.

result, A

We do

and

we d i s c u s s

A 1 , in b l o c k

invertible matrix

A

A'

are

are

the b as is

P

similar via

of our w o r k

In that ch ap te r,

triangular

so by g i v i n g c o n d i t i o n s ,

that an and

h o w to d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r

we

must

in T h e o r e m 4.6,

satisfy

A P = PA'

.

specify procedures

in o r d e r tha t

These

t h r o u g h o u t mos t

fo r m are

conditions

of C h a p t e r

to be u s e d

5.

in de ter-

mining whether

A

and

special methods

for s e ve ra l p o s s i b l e

teristic polynomial, The first irreducible results

of C h a p t e r

and

are

f(0) = 0

f(0)

, we n o t e

We p r e s e n t

forms of the c h a r a c ­

f(A)

are

has

In this

to a s s o c i a t e

If

that

is w h e n f 0 .

ideals

similar.

similar.

, individually.

3 are u s e d

If th es e

the m a t r i c e s but

f(A)

are

fo r m c o n s i d e r e d

f a ct or s

e a c h matrix.

A'

distinct

case,

the

an ideal w i t h

in the same class,

f(A)

has d i s t i n c t

then

factors,

a c o m b i n a t i o n of m e t h o d s

is to

be used. Secon dl y, has an n - f o l d case, f(A)

f(A) =

we consider ro o t

= An

(A - a ) n

in

.

R

.

the m i n i m u m

and

A'

, then we

= PA*

gi v e

.

When

We in this

case.

ity c l a s s e s

first

, i.e.

look at the n i l p o t e n t

We p r o v e

that

case if

for

f(A)

have n e c e s s a r y and s u f f i c i e n t

f(A)

P

is not shows

that

A

T h e r e wi l l

of m a t r i c e s

f(A)

l a t e r that the g e n e r a l

must

satisfy

case,

the d e t e r ­ = An

is

for

A

conditions

in o r d e r

that

the m i n i m u m p o l y n o m i a l ,

that these

but n o t n e c e s s a r y

also n o t e

(A - a ) n

and the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c p o l y n o m i a l

an e x a m p l e w h i c h

sufficient,

=

ca n be r e d u c e d to this

w h i c h an i n v e r t i b l e m a t r i x AP

We

We p r o v e

m i n a t i o n of sim il ar it y. both

f(A)

conditions

we

are

for similarity.

is not

a se p a r a b l e

Q-algebra

be an i n f i n i t e n u m b e r of s i m i l a r ­

having

characteristic polynomial

over

n u m b e r of n o n - a s s o c i a t e s .

As

f(A)

= An

as m i n i m u m and

any ring w i t h an an example,

infinite

we l o o k at the

8

case w h e r e

f(A)

= A2

and

specify a representative W e nex t g(a) 4.6

f 0 .

lo o k at the The

in this

must have

is m o r e

f(A)

distinct

may

has

consider

with

g(0)

similarity given

last

g ( A) h( A) modify

with

We

for

h(A)

case

followed

in d e t e r m i n i n g

We

examine

described whether indicate

fo r m

the

the c o n d i t i o n s

4.6

g(A)

that

if

= 0 , we • g(A) for the

similarity. is

f(A)

in this

=

We a g a i n case

to o b ta in the

specia l

further modify

and

h(A)

these

.

a s u m m a r y of the p r o c e d u r e whether

two m a t r i c e s

for m of forms

the g e n e r a l p r o c e d u r e .

to be

similar.

a nd the

of the m a t r i c e s .

of C h a p t e r

similar.

are

f(A)

using a combination

se c t i o n s are

P

a d e t e r m i n a t i o n m a y be p o s s i b l e

factored

in stages,

the m a t r i c e s

= A

We also c o n s i d e r

block triangular

in p r e v i o u s

f(0)

f(A)

is also q u a d r a t i c and case,

in T h e o r e m

in c o m b i n a t i o n w i t h

of T h e o r e m

the p o l y n o m i a l s

then proceed

and

fo r m c o n s i d e r e d

by e x a m i n i n g

corresponding

the

with

We also n o t e

to d e t e r m i n e

In this

first

- a)

a quadratic polynomial.

we p r e s e n t

we

the fo r m w h i c h

fa cto rs

section

conditions.

Fin a l l y ,

= g(A)(A

so that

for si m il ar it y.

g(A)

exa mpl e,

similarity given

then m a y use

in this

the c o n d i t i o n s

ca se w h e n

f(A)

as h a v i n g

individual

new conditions

form

irreducible

Latimer-MacDuffee method T he

In this

easily determined.

f(A)

f 0 .

.

of each s i m i l a r i t y class.

conditions

are m o d i f i e d

R = 1

We

of the m e t h o d s

5,

An example We no t e here

to d e t e r m i n e is g i v e n to that

all

cases

9

for

n £

la rg er

5 n

can be h a n d l e d u s i n g

, a r e d u c t i o n to a si mp le r case

We will n o w d e s c r i b e an d p r e v i o u s

results.

chapter

is p r i m a r i l y

for

Theorem

1.5,

w h i c h shows

c o r r e s p o n d to s i m i l a r m a t r i c e s re sults.

Our w o r k

ing re su l t s s tu dy

the

be

associated

the n u m b e r

T he

fi rst

y i el ds

of s i m i l a r i t y cl as s e s

s e c t i o n of C h a p t e r result

on a s s o c i a t i n g R

Latimer-MacDuffee

the

s e c t i o n of that

chapter.

4 is al s o

that m a t r i c e s

number

that

there

statement can thus

this

is

one.

ideals

of an

We d e ve l o p

associated

T he p r e s e n t a t i o n

in the

to se co n d

in the

fir st pa rt

a g e n e r a l i z a t i o n of a k n o w n result,

ca n be t r a n s f o r m e d result

to an in teg ral

is the ring of i n t e g e r s

matrices

R

this

is fi ni t e

an ideal

b e t w e e n the A - m o d u l e s

ca se w h e n

The

to the

3 is the g e n e r a l i z a t i o n

the r e l a t i o n s h i p

extend

of r e l a t ­

We do

the r e su lt

f i e l d w i t h class n u m b e r

We

A-modules

over o r de rs

algebraic number

of C h a p t e r

informa­

e x t e n s i o n of k n o w n

of .isomorphism classes.

to the c a s e w h e r e

and

first

stated.

of a c l a s s i c a l matrix

is a slight

to ma tr ice s.

t h e o r y of l a tt ic es

explicitly

isomorphic

in the se co n d c h a p t e r c o n s i s t s

a f i ni te n u m b e r

of w h e n

that

in the

of b a c k g r o u n d

the t h e o r y of lat ti ce s

of A - m o d u l e s

because are

fr o m

b e t w e e n our

The m a t e r i a l

the p u r p o s e

For

is o f t e n poss ible.

the r e l a t i o n s h i p

re su l t s

tion.

this p ro ce du re .

into b l o c k t r i a n g u l a r

from the case w h e n

the ring of i n te ge rs

fi el d w i t h cla ss

n u m b e r one.

R = ~JJ_

form.

to the

of an a l g e b r a i c The r e m a i n d e r

of this

10

c h a p t e r g ive s

our

i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of this result,

h o w it can be u s e d In C h a p t e r

5 we

in the

ea c h o f these Thus, extended ring

d e t e r m i n a t i o n of sim il ar it y.

consider various possible

g i v i n g m e t h o d s to be used

sh owi ng

for d e t e r m i n i n g

forms

for

f(A)

similarity

in

cases.

in the

results

of i n t e g e r s We

latter part for

R = ~]j_

of the thesis, to the case w h e n

o f an a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r have

we have

number

one.

then us e d t he se

method

of d e t e r m i n i n g w h e n two m a t r i c e s

R

field w i t h

resul ts are

is the class

to de ve l o p similar.

a

,

Chapter

1

The Module Associated

1.

D e f i n i t i o n of the M o d u l e Throughout

rin g w i t h

this

ide ntity.

chapter, For

A

R

the ri n g of p o l y n o m i a l s

fro m

.

R

Rn

wi ll

h a v i n g en tr i e s h(A)

= r m Am +

h(A) in

from ...

denote R

.

from

R Let

+ r xA + r 0

denote

a commutative

X

A

is

is an

R [A ]

with coefficients

of

n xn

matrices

an el e m e nt

of

el em en t of

r mA m + in

...

A

Rn

R[A]

+ r xA

with

and , then

+ r 0I

coefficients

. A

=

(a^j) is

be an el e m e nt of f(A)

.

{ e j , e 2 , . .. ,e n } .

Let

M

We d e f i n e

Rn

whose

character­

be a free R - m o d u l e w i t h the a c t i o n of

A

on

by

A • v = A

• v

to all

e le me nt s

by

A *

We d e f i n e for all h(A) is

If

, the rin g of p o l y n o m i a l s

istic p o l y n o m i a l R-basis

in

the ring

will d e n o t e the p o l y n o m i a l R [A ]

will

an i n d e t e r m i na te ,

de n o t e s

M

to a M a t r i x

of

v e M R[A]

therefore

e• = i

n 7 a ••e • . .L _ 11 j j= l

the a c t i o n of

A

.

extend s

This

via

action

h(A)

on

• v = h(A)

an R [A ] -module. 11

M

• v

.

We

see

that

M

12

It is c l e a r that si nc e Rn

is not

free as an R [ A ] - m o d u l e

the C a y l e y - H a m i l t o n T h e o r e m h o l d s

[12,

p 101].

R[A]-basis phism

Let

F

T :F -* M

and d e n o t e

for m a t r i c e s

in

be a free R [X ] -modu le w i t h

{ u 1 ,...,un } .

D e f i n e an R [A ] -m od ul e h o m o m o r ­

by

T(

map,

M

its

I h i (A) ui) = I i=l i=l

ke r n e l

by

Kcr T

.

h i (A)ei

T

is c l e a r l y an onto

so w e have

M s F/Ker T

Note

that

M

is

.

a finitely generated R[A]-module which

is

free as an R-m odu le .

2.

The Annihilator Let

A

polynomial section we annihilate We in

A

n x n If

be

M

an el em e n t

f(A)

R[A]

of

Rn

f irs t n o t e

{h(A)

that

with coefficients

+

...

R n [A]

, it c o r r e s p o n d s

entry

is the p o l y n o m i a l is the

e R[A] |h (A)

in

.

In this

R[A]

• M = 0}

which

.

> the ring o f p o l y n o m i a l s

from

Rn from

+ AiA

and

R[^]n

R[A]

ar e

+ A0

Ak

isomorphic.

R[A]

a m Am + a m _ i A m 1 + e n t r y of

» the ring of

is an e l e m e n t

to the m a t r i x of

(i,j)

M

R n [^]

m a t r i c e s w i t h e n tr ie s

ak

with characteristic

the set of p o l y n o m i a l s

, i.e.

A m Am + A m _ i A m _ 1

where

in

and a s s o c i a t e d R [ A ] - m o d u l e

specify M

of

,

...

whose

of (i,j)

+ axA + a 0

k = 0,1,...,m

.

13

We wi l l

identify

nomial ,

h(A)

m a t r i x of

, of

R [AJ n

T h e o r e m 1.1 h(A)

these

R [A ]

Let

Suppose

R [ A ] - a c t i o n on

h(A)

h(A)

M

if

h(A)

= 0

M

on

• M = 0 . M

, we

see

T h e set R[A]

, called

U si ng that

f(A)

= h(A) •

if

R[A]

h(A) =

.

Th e n

0 . the

• M

i m pli es

.

= 0 . This

ideal

R[A]

means

that

[]

= 0} is

of the m a t r i x

[16,

the C a y l e y - H a m i l t o n

Thus

n

vi a

y(h(A ))

= R[A]/„

the anni-

polynomial.

of the on t o ma p

isomorphism

R [A]

is

.

= h(A)

.

of

p 162].

is a n o n - z e r o

(hence no n- ze ro )

-> R[A]

A

ideal

.

.

of

A

an

ideal

Since

A

= 0.

the n u l l

e n

the

h(A)

e R [A ] |h(A)

is the k e r n e l

we h a v e

M = 0

.

h(A)

this

f(A)

y:R[A]

Therefore,

of

the d e f i n i t i o n of the a c t i o n o f

is a m o n i c

-n

as a s c al ar

By the d e f i n i t i o n of

M

= {h(A)

in

T h e o r e m holds,

that

• M

the null

M

a poly­

, we have

s h o w n that

h i l a t o r of

note

.

suppose

rr

T h u s w e ha v e

s in ce

and o n l y

annihilates

Conversely, h(A)

Thus,

m a y be c o n s i d e r e d

be an el e m e n t

h(A)

Thus,

rings.

.

annihilates

Proof

isomorphic

ideal We

14

Let

(f(A))

de n ot e

the p r i n c i p a l

ideal

of

R[A]

g e n e r a t e d by the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c p o l y n o m i a l

of

A

(adj(AI-A))

AI

- A

denote

the a d j o i n t m a t r i x of

.

Let .

We m a y

wr i t e

f(A)

We use

this

following

Theorem g(A)

c on c e p t

1.2

[16]

r ight

such

Suppose (AI

f(A)

zero d i v i s o r f(A)

Let

g(A)

if there

(*)

exi st s

- A)

is satisf ie d.

.

in the

R [A ] .

an m a t r i x

Th e n

K(A)

in

.

M u l t i p l i c a t i o n on the

yields:

= K(A)f(A)(AI

- A)

= K( A)( AI

- A) f (A )

.

is a m o n i c p o l y n o m i a l in

R[A]

in

d i v i d e b o t h si des

R[A]n

.

Thus,

we may

, it is not

a by

, so

g(A)

Therefore

g(A)

= 0

Conversely, th er e

be an el em en t of

g (A) (adj (AI-A) ) = K(A) f (A)

by

- A)

that

g( A)f(A)

Si n ce

(adj(AI-A))(AI

of c h a r a c t e r i s t i c p o l y n o m i a l

if and only

(*)

Proof

=

theorem.

e 77

R[A]n

= de t(AI-A)

is a m a t r i x

= K ( A) (A I

- A)

.

and

g(A)

e

suppose

g(A)

= 0 .It t h e n

K(A)

g (A)

in

n

R[A]n

= K ( A)( AI

su ch that

- A)

.

fo l l o w s

t hat

15

Multiplication

on the right

by

adj(AI-A)

then yiel ds

(*),

as desired.

[]

T h e o r e m 1.2 elements

of

su gge sts .

ti

adj (AI-A)

, that

e n t r y of

(AI

Let

is,

- A)

a m e t h o d of d e t e r m i n i n g j (A)

A^j(A)

.

denote

is

the

the

(i,j) en try

the c o f a c t o r

of the

of

(i,j)

Th e r e s u l t of T h e o r e m 1.2 can be

restated: The p o l y n o m i a l on l y n2

if

g(A)

g(A)

e R [A ]

satisfies

i

1 , 2 , . . . ,n , j every polynomial

uniquely

as

g (A)

the d e g r e e

of

a monic polynomial elements

of

less

Theorem in terms

than

cn-

p(A)

[32,

n

1.2

ideal

of

mod

g(A)

s y s t e m of

S

. m a y be w r i t t e n

+ q (A) f (A)

is less 30].

(f (A)) ,

e R[A]

than

Thus,

n

, s in ce f(A)

several

s ol uti on s,

of

s y s t e m of co ng ru en ce s. straightforward consequences

of an ideal.

be a c o m m u t a t i v e ri n g w i t h S

is

to d e t e r m i n e the

find all n o n - z e r o

, to the ab ov e

of the r a d i c a l

an

p

also has

Let

= 0

= p (A)

, we w o u l d

D e f i n i t i o n 1.1 and

if and

following

1 , 2 , . . *,n

Fur th er ,

degree

the

~n

congruences

g ( A ) A i j (A)

where

is in

.

The r a d i c a l

of

identity

, r( 0}

of

S .

n

, of

.

A

is

. t~i

.

As

in the

theorem,

su c h that

- A)

.

that

det( g( A) )

= d e t( K( A))

• de t(AI-A)

,

or

g (A)

so

g (A)n e

Corollary Proof som e

(f (A))

1.4

As

(f(A))

Co nv e r s e l y , 77

, (f(A))

Thu s

h(A)

5

g(A)

77

e r(f(A)) .

, that

in the p r e v i o u s so

g(A)

suppose so

e r (77 ) .

• f(A)

£ ( 7 7 ) = r(f(A))

g(A) e r(77)

m > 0 .

g ( A ) mn s

and

[16]

Suppose

= det( K( A) )

h(A)

.

is, g ( A ) m

e

cor ol la ry ,

£ r(f (A)) h(A)

[]

for

we have

.

e r(f(A))

e(f(A))

77

5

77

. Since for some

f(A) m

e >0 []

.

17

It is well ^

k now n

[2, p 9]

is the i n t e r s e c t i o n of the p r i m e

The last c o r o l l a r y t h e r e f o r e structures are

of the

rings

tells

prime

r(f(A))

ideal,

=

containing

us that the p r i m e

R[ A] /( f( X) )

(f(A))

and

R[A]

^

.

ideal

= R [X ]/7^

which R[A]

impli es .

, for

5

that

In this

=

r(f(A))

(f(A))

Throughout

having

of

M

in

MA

and

Mg

and

respectively.

Mg

, we m a y c o n s i d e r b o t h

R

we c o n s i d e r

two m a t r i c e s ,

Si nc e MA

A

as c h a r a c t e r i s t i c p o l y n o m i a l .

the R [A ] -modules

in the ob v i o u s way.

are s i m i l a r over

I s o m o r p h i s m of M o d u l e s

f(A)

A

modules

c n ,

(f(A))

= R[A]/„

and

this section,

Rn

We d e n o t e by B

is a

case \\re have

S i m i l a r i t y of M a t r i c e s

, of

(f(A))

is the a n n i h i l a t o r

R[A]/(f(A))

B

example when

we have

n

an d

ideals

of an ideal

identical. If

3.

that the radic al

f(A) and

if and only

annihilates

Mg

We wi l l

a s s o c i a t e d to

as

MA

and

R[A]/(f(A))-

sh o w that

A

and

B

if their a s s o c i a t e d m o d u l e s

are R [A ] / ( f( A) ) - i s o m o r p h i c .

Definition say

that

exists R

and

1.2 A

For two

is s i m i l a r

a matrix AP

= PB

P .

of

el em e n ts

A

to

B

over

R

such that

and R

B

of

Rn

if and o n l y det(P)

, we if there

is a unit of

18

We m a y of

also expres s

R[A]- actions.

an d by

TB

v e Ma

and all

w e Mg

A

is s i m i l a r

exis ts

an R - m o d u l e

(y o T a )

If

P = (P j j )

A

a nd B

to

in terms

.

That

is,

MA

for all

,

and

B

TB • w = A • w

over

isomorphism

• v =

of s i m i l a r i t y

the R [ A ] - a c t i o n on

on Mg

• v = A • v

Thus,

co n c e p t

Den ot e by T A

the R [ A ] - a c t i o n

TA

a c t i o n of

the

if and on l y

if there

y :MA ->■ M B such that

(T b o y)

is the m a t r i x

R

.

• v

for all

w h i c h yi el d s

as

in the d e f i n i t i o n ,

P

on

th e n

v e MA

.

the s i m i l a r i t y

y

represents

of

the

MA n

1

for

the

R-basis

as a c h a n g e R-module

Theorem Ma

of basis

1.5 A Mg

is are

of

an R - i s o m o r p h i s m

first

for all

that

v

= A • (y(v))

is o m o r p h i s m ,

E

J=1

p ijei

MA

an d

to

isomorphic

e x is ts

• y(v)

MA

si mi l a r

Suppose

Tg

=

.

We m a y

consider

y

R - i s o m o r p h i s m on the u n d e r l y i n g

Proof

T B o y(v)

ei

{ e 1 } ...,en } of

structures

a nd

'

MB .

B

ove r

is

similar

y : M A -»■ M B

, it

if and on ly

if

R[A]/(f(A)) -modules. A

in

R

MA

.

B

su ch that

Since

is c l e a r

to

TA

that

, so t he re y o T A (v)

• v = A • v y

h e n c e an R [A ] / ( f ( A ) ) -isomor ph is m.

= and

is an R[A]-

19

Conversely, is om or p hi sm . denote R[A]

its

su pp os e

Y-’M a

as an

For any e l em e n t

image

in

-> R [ A ] /( f (A ))

h(A)

R[ A ]/ (f (A )) .

/ (f C^) ) “

e R [A ] , let

under

Th e a c t i o n of

h(A)

the c a n o n i c a l m ap

h(A)

on

MA

is,

by

de f i n it io n ,

h(A)

• v = h(A)

It is n o w c l e a r

that

v e MA y

module

structures

is an R - m o d u l e

are s i m i l a r o v e r

Properties Th is

involved

of

A

R

1.3

A

s u c h th a t

Definition

1.4

ring

O)

, we have

that

A

R-

an d

B []

A

and

in

If

R

The

of two

re s u l ts

la te r ch apters.

here

rings are

to

We w i l l not m a k e

or t h e i r a s s o c i a t e d m o d u l e s .

f o l l o w i n g de fi ni ti on s.

regular element ar

A

s e ve ra l p r o p e r t i e s

to m a t r i c e s

o n e r e g u l a r el ement, the u n i q u e

B

study of ma tr ice s.

We b e g i n w i t h the

element

an d

of the R in gs

reference

Definition

y

we hav e

i s o m o r p h i s m on the u n d e r l y i n g

section presents in our

= A • y(v) = T b o

and

.

be u s e d f o r r e f e r e n c e specific

• v)

.

.

Si n ce

4.

v e MA

for all

yis an R [ A ] - i s o m o r p h i s m

y o T a (v ) = y (A

for all

• v

= 0

impli es

r

of a ring a = 0

is a c o m m u t a t i v e

in

R

Q

is an

.

ring w i t h at

the total q u o t i e n t r i n g

satisfy in g:

R

of

least R

is

20

i)

Q

has

ii)

R

is a su br in g of

iii)

an identity,

Every regular in ver se

iv)

in

b

Sin ce

a

the

clear

that w h e n e v e r

of

R

has

of

R

of

Q

b

is of the

fo r m

are el em e n ts

of

ab” 1 R

and

element.

Q

of

R

is an int egral

.

an

,

and

ring

f ie ld

R

has

an identity,

is w e l l - d e f i n e d .

We have

domain,

the f o l l o w i n g

the

It is Q

is the

result

for a

sum of rings.

T h e o r e m 1.6 with

of

ri n g we are c o n s i d e r i n g

quotient

direct

Q

is a re gu l a r

total

quotient

e l em en t

E v e r y el em en t where

Q ,

Suppose

i d en ti ty S^

for

the to tal Proof

1

S j , S 2 , . . . ,Sk

and

that

i=l,2,...,k.

quotient

ring of

We fi rst n o t e that

1 ©

...

© 1

the

same

Qi

and

that

identity.

S

are c o m m u t a t i v e rings

is the total q u o t i e n t Then

Q = Q 1 @ . . . @ Q k

S = Sx © S

...

© Sk

is a ring w i t h

is a su bri ng of

The r e g u l a r

ele me nt s

Q of

ring is

. i de nt it y , w h i c h has S

are of the

fo r m

a = a1 ©

...

where

a^^

is a r e g u l a r e l e m e n t of

a f 1 ©

...

© a k _1

of

Q

.

is the

© ak

in ver se of

Sj^ . a

Thus and

a -1 =

is an element

21

Let

x = Xj

Qi

is the

b^

is r e g u l a r

total

x = a j b i -1 ©

Since 1.4,

Q

identity i)

quotient

...

Q

We n o w

. . . © Xj,

in

be any e l e m e n t

ring of

, x^

, i = l,2,...,k

© a kb k _1

satisfies

is the

Definition

©

total

=

(ax ©

all

.

...

ring

© a k ) Cb x ©

of

1.5

[2]

1 , and

Let R

S

s e S

if

s

S

R iii)

, S

The

closure S iv)

with

[]

of

R

de pe ndence.

ring w i t h

that

1 e R

.

S

is

in

of

ove r

S

is c a l l e d S an d

R

in tegral

in te gr al

elements R

in

. over R

.

that are

the i n t e g r a l

is a s u b r i n g of

.

If

R

we

say

Throughout monic

over

© b k ) -1

is the root of a m o n i c

is said to be

int e g r a l

...

is said to be i n t e g r a l

e l e m e n t of

set of all

wh er e

.

such

polynomial with coefficients If e v e r y

S in ce

of D e f i n i t i o n

be a c o m m u t a t i v e

a su br i n g of

An element R

S

.

Th er e f o r e ,

the c o n d i t i o n s

quotient

Q

= a ^ b ^ -1

look at the p r o p e r t y of in tegral

ov e r

ii)

of

polynomial

is R

its own

in te gr al

is i n t e g r a l l y

the rest of this in

identity whose

R[A]

, where

quotient

c l os u r e

closed

section, R

in

let

in

S

S

,

.

f(A)

be a

is a c o m m u t a t i v e

ring w e d e n o t e by

Q

.

ring

Set

.

22

A = R[A] / (f (A.))

N o t e that identity. el e m e n t s of

in t e g r a l

indeterminate

i n te gr al

ov e r

i n te gr al

ov er

Theorem

1.7

0

R R

Let

is the

R

is c l e a r l y

e l e m e n t of

R

A

A

t i v i t y of

and

, having

The

A

be the

in t e g r a l

a s u b r i n g of is

i nt eg ra l

dependence

is,

g(A)

e 0

f(A)

, where

according denotes the

as

f o rm al

^ 0

are

A

.

Let A

0

is

in

A

in t e g r a l

ove r

be any

By the

g(A)

transi­

is

is the

in te g r a l

int egr al

.

[]

is s e pa ra bi li ty .

We

domain with quotient

irreducible

or

Then

polynomial

is se p a r a b l e g'(A)

d e r i v a t i v e of

A =

.

g(A)£

or i n s e p a r a b l e

= 0 , where

g(A)

.

.

g(A) .

R

A

d i m e n s i o n a l Q-algebra.

is a field,

g'(A)

in

be a m o n i c po ly n o m i a l .

[32] A n K

of

w h i c h is

Thus

is an in t e g r a l

isa fin it e

1.6

A

ove r

di s c u s s

R

0

A

field

Definition

.

of

and pow er s

, we see that

[2, p 60],

in

R

Q l>]/ (f O ) )

0

e v e r y e l eme nt R

cl os ur e

c l o s u r e of

is a s u b r i n g of

Let

A

0

final p r o p e r t y we

.

= 0 in further,

n o w a s s u m e that Q

f(A)

the same

of in te g r a l

of

ele me nt s

We ha v e

which

, that

Si nce

.

no t e that

.

integral

c l o s u r e of

K[A]

A

and p r o d u c t s

R

A .

int e g ra l

Since

, A

of

sums

over

and

Proof

over

that

A= Q[ A ]/ (f (A ))

is a sum of p r o d u c t s of e l em en ts

of the

Then

is a s u b r i n g

We re ca l l are

A

A

an d

g'(A)

23

Using

standard references

it c a n be s h o w n that only

if

f(A)

is

A

is a s e p a r a b l e

the p r o d u c t

separable polynomials. for

A

(for ex amp le

Q-algebra

o f disti nct ,

Th i s w i l l

serve

[6 ] or

[32]), if and

ir re du c ib le ,

as our c r i t e r i o n

to be se parable.

Suppose

f(A)

f(A)

into di s t i n c t ,

Since

the

ideals

k II f^CA) i= 1

=

is

irreducible,

(f^CA))

relatively co-maximal,

and

we m a y

the

f a c t o r i z a t i o n of

separable polynomials.

(fj(A)) apply

, for

i f j

the C h i n e s e

, are

Remainder

Theorem and write

A = A\

where

^

= Q[A] / (f^ (A) )

extension of A

Q

is s e m i - s i m p l e .

a polynomial In this be

.

A

A

is s e p a r a b l e

this

Suppose

and

Let

if

be

important

is a D e d e k i n d domain,

Q

see

Q

is

that zero,

f(A)

ca n

the d i s c u s s i o n of a

integrally closed domain

is m a x i m a l . f(A)

if a n d on l y

section with

ch a p t e r s .

R

of

we

irreducible polynomials.

situation which will

ideal

is s ep ar ab le ,

algebraic

if a n d o n l y if it is i r re d u c i b l e .

particular

noetherian,

© i4k

If the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c

into d i s t i n c t

We c o n c l u d e

...

is a f i n i t e s e p a r a b l e if

is s e p a r a b l e

case,

factored

Thus,

©

in w h i c h

be the q u o t i e n t

a monic polynomial.

Suppose

in later that

is,

every prime

fi el d o f

that

a

f(A)

R is

24

the p r o d u c t mial s,

of di s t i nc t,

so that

As

ir red uci ble ,

A = Q [ A] / ( f ( A ) )

above,

i . We

is a finite, Let

de no t e

then ha v e

[4, V

the

§1]

in t e g r a l

We ha v e f i e l d of

0 j_

for all

the t o t al

quotient

© Ak

e x t e n s i o n of

int egr al

cl os ur e

of

Q R

, for all in

^

.

that

c l o s u r e of

further

...

separable

0 = 0x ©

is the

is a s e p a r a b l e Q -a lge bra .

we write

A = Ax ©

where

separable p o l y n o ­

[31,

R

in

p 141]

i .

ri n g of

...

© (?k

A that

. A^ is the q u o t i e n t

Thus, by T h e o r e m 1.6, 0

.

A

is

Chapter Lattices

1.

Definitions

and B a si c

Throughout with

this

the q u o t i e n t

over Ord er s

Re sul ts

chapter,

f ie ld the

Q

R

.

\^e ha v e

Definition

2.1

A n R -ord er

S

containing

the

i d e n t i t y of

A

S

is a f i n i t e l y

ii)

S

contains

S-module which considered

We

in

A is a s u b r i n g of

a Q-basis

A ,

, such that

g e n e r a t e d R- module;

A n S -l at ti ce

of

A

, i.e.

of an R - o r d e r

and QS = A

S

is an

is f i n i t e l y g e n e r a t e d and t o r s i o n - f r e e w h e n

say that

S

is a m a x i m a l

contained

is g i v e n

every R-order

S

in

R-order

in any o th er

a s e p a r a b l e Q- al g e b r a ,

An e x a m p l e

a finitely generated

as a n R-module.

not properly is n o t

A

f o l l o w i n g de fin iti ons .

i)

2.2

will be a D e d e k i n d d o ma in

For

Q- a l g e b r a ,

Definition

2

R-order

maximal

[25, p

201].

is c o n t a i n e d

orders If

A

in a m a x i m a l

is a c o m m u t a t i v e ,

separable Q-algebra,

maximal

R-order.

Maximal

special

pr operty.

R-orders

25

in

have

there the

A in

if A

.

n e e d not is

S

is

If

A

exist.

separ ab le ,

R-order.

If

A

is e x a c t l y one following

26

Theorem

2.1

[24, p 178]

Suppose

algebra and

S

S-lattice

S - pr oj e c ti ve .

is

We n o w A

by

.

a pp ly

M

Set

these of

Rn

the A - m o d u l e A

that

see

A

M

is a A - m o d u l e

and

is an R - o r d e r

in

A = Q [ A ]/ (f (A ))

A

.

A

S u p p o s e n ow that

Let

R

A

.

and

QA = A

,

By its co n s t r u c t i o n ,

Thus,

M

free,

of d i s t i n c t

h en ce

is a A-latti ce.

is a s e p a r a b l e Q-a lg eb ra .

is the p r o d u c t

D e no te

.

is f i n i t e l y g e n e r a t e d a nd

t o r s i o n - f r e e , as an R-mod ule .

f(A)

Then.every

with characteristic polynomial

a s s o c i a t e d to a m a t r i x

which

Q-

to our situat ion .

is f i n i t e l y g e n e r a t e d over

we

is,

in A .

definitions

A = R[A]/(f(A))

Since

is a s e p a r a b l e

is a m a x i m a l R - o r d e r

be an el em e n t

f(A)

A

irreducible

Th at

se p a r a b l e

k polynomials,

f(A)

=

II

f^CA) , and we m ay xvrite

A =

i= 1 Ax ©

...

we ha v e

©

where

the

[25, p 179]

Q-algebra

Sis an R - o r d e r i)

S

in

A

A

Let

S

In this

be a su bri ng

, h a v i n g the same

situation

of the

identity

as

A

.

if and onl y if

is a left R- mo dul e;

ii)

S

co n t a i n s a Q - b a s i s

iii) S

is

int eg ra l

Since

A

is

satisfies

.

f o l l o w i n g c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n of R-orders.

T h e o r e m 2.2 separable

= Q [ A ] / ( f i (A))

over

int eg ra l

the a bo ve

R

ov er

con di ti on s.

of

A , i.e.

QS = A

;

.

R

, it is c l e a r

Let

0

be the

that

A

int egral

27

c l o su re

of

R-order

in

R A

R

S

containing in

If

A

this

i

for

@ A

and

.

.

Then

Th at is,

we

first

i f j 0^

0

in

set

(fj_(A))

of

if A^

= 0

, A = 0

and

A = Aj

©

...

c l o s u r e of R

in

A

is

R

R-order

for

and u s e d to d e t e r m i n e

can be c o m p u t e d in W e i s s

section,

© Ak

.

If

in

2^

,

in

A

the d i s c r i m i n a n t s

, the

... , . When

of

A^

eq ua li ty , as

Condition

we wil l

be d i s c u s s i n g a s i t u a t i o n

the n u m b e r of i s o m o r p h i s m c l a s s e s of m o d u l e s

is

are

[31].

The J o r d a n - Z a s s e n h a u s

a t e d to m a t r i c e s ,

by

, i =

i = l,2,...,k

0^

Q

A

determine

0 = 01 ®

and

on

in

Then,

(fj(A))

field,

of m a t r i c e s ,

i nt eg ra l

strictly

.

To

is an a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r

which

is

Aj_ = R[ A] /( f^ (A))

in t e g r a l

closure

A

A-module.

Hen ce , Ais the m a x i m a l

In this

S

inA

Q

2.

is an

is the u n i q u e m a x i m a l

, we h a v e

the

= 0 , if and o n l y

discussed

0

e ve ry R - o r d e r

there is no R - o r d e r

is a p r o j e c t i v e

i n te g ra l

[4].

0

If the ideals

we d e n o t e by

co mm ut a ti ve ,

in A

integrally closed

occurs,

co m a x i m a l

S

Therefore,

M

.

is

.

is

l,2,...,k

then the

0

.

2.1,

0

is any R - o r d e r

in

0

R-order

when

S i nc e

and we have

is c o n t a i n e d

Theorem

.

.

Suppose over

in A

hence

finite.

quotient

in

associ­

the n u m b e r of s i m i l a r i t y c l a s s e s We w i l l

fi eld of

R

need a further .

assumption

28 Definition i)

2.5 K

Let

be a field.

is an a l g e b r a i c

fi nit e ii)

K

K

number field

e x t e n s i o n of the

is a f u n c t i o n f i e l d

rational

if it is

e x t e n s i o n of a f i e l d of ra ti ona l k(X) iii)

K

, where

is said

eit he r

k

if it

is a

f ie ld

Q

.

a fini te f u nct io ns,

is a fin it e field,

to be a g l o b a l

field

an a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r

if it

is

field or a

f u n c t i o n field.

When will

Q

is a glo b al

be useful.

ideal

classes.

this

Dedekind domain whose

s e c t i o n we quotient

c h a r a c t e r i s t i c po ly n o m i a l .

will in

Rn

d en o t e

.

Set

We a s s u m e A

has p r o p e r t i e s

R

for any

be c o n s i d e r i n g m a t r i c e s

A = Q[ A] / ( f ( A ) )

R

In p a r t i c u l a r , S ec o n dl y,

Throughout

We will

field,

has a finite n u m b e r a e R , R/aR

as su m e that

field of

that

Q Rn

is

R

finite.

is

a

is a g l o b a l ha v i n g

f(A)

A = R[ A] /(f(A)) is a se p a r ab le

the A - l a t t i c e a s s o c i a t e d to

of

field. as

and Q-a lg eb ra .

the m a t r i x

A

.

For

any R - o r d e r

S

in

A

may construct

the A - m o d u l e

QM = Q 0 M R

.

To

A = Q ® S R

from the d e f i n i t i o n of R-order,

Q ® M = R

see

Q ©

that

QM

and any S - l a t t i c e

QM

in the ca n o n i c a l is an A - m od ul e,

(S 0 M) = (Q ® S) ® M = R S R S

M

, we

way:

we n o t e

and we

A 0 M S

have

.

that

29

We t h e r e f o r e

identify

M

consider

embedded

in

M

By c o n s t r u c t i o n , {ei,...,en } •

ra n k of

of

T h e r a n k of

Q

to m a t r i c e s

of A - l a t t i c e s

Our d e v e l o p m e n t n e e d the c o n c e p t

Definition

2.4

n

.

of

Rn

are all

an R - b a s i s

corresponds

and

there

is

.

n

Als o,

, the

the A - l a t t i c e s

of R - r a n k

n

.

to m a t r i c e s [23].

is finite. We

first

be any R - o r d e r

in A

= A

that of

.

A n S -ideal

.

are n o t n e c e s ­

this d e f i n i t i o n e x c l u d e s

r < n

elements.

as R - m o d u l e s ,

zero d i v i s o r s ,

ide al s

S u c h ideals

si nc e they c o n s i s t so they are n o t

of

A-lattices.

algebraic number

th eo r y w h i c h

excludes

ideal.

Definition ol

R

to the r e s t r i c t i o n of the d e f i n i t i o n of

in c l a s s i c a l

zero

MA

a s s o c i a t e d to m a t r i c e s

Note

e l e m e n t s w h i c h are

the

and

the n u m b e r of A - i s o m o r p h i s m

suc h that Q

are not torsion-free

ideal

in

that of R e i n e r

S

A Z ,...,A^

that

Sji

, it

is a fin it e d i m e n s i o n a l

dimensional

n u m b e r of

in the

is a glob al

A = Ax @

are R - o r d e r s

S

el em en t

Ho we ve r,

Q -a lg e b r a ,

Proof

ring of

a non-zero

is i r r e d u c i b l e

2.3

number

.

r e m a r k that the class n u m b e r

i nt e g r a l

the c l a s s

.

not n e c e s s a r i l y

of

is ca l le d

h(S)

and

exists

is

Lem ma

of S - i d e a l s

, and

fo rm in g

ideals,

one

of each

is

ideal

all p o s s i b l e

from ea ch

The n u m b e r of S - i d e a l

S^

,

cl as se s k

d e t e r m i n e d by this

set

is at m o s t

the p r o d u c t

II

hCSj^)

,

the re

is

i= 1 which

is finite.

a decomposition i

Further , Oi* -

is an S^-ideal.

if ©

Hence

...

c/l,

©

is any S -i de al , [32, p 175],

is in the same

wh ere

cl as s

as

31

one of the

idea ls

c o n s t r u c t e d a bo ve and

h(S)

is

finite.

[]

T h e o r e m 2.4 the n

[23]

h(0) S in ce

where

A^

in

R-order

in

,

A

A

is separa bl e,

...

© 0k

we w r i t e

is a glob al

where

0^

A = A1 ©

field.

... © A^.

Therefore

is the i n t e g r a l

closure

of

R

Aj_ .

A^

0i

is a D e d e k i n d d o m a i n w i t h q u o t i e n t

, a gl ob a l

for all

i

field,

.

so the

Therefore,

class n u m b e r of

by L e m m a

2.3,

0^

field is finite

the cl as s n u m b e r of

is finite.

0

Theorem .

2.5

If two

[]

[23]

Let

O-ideals

in the

same O - i d e a l

Proof

Suppose

are

A

.

1 .6 ],

S in ce

A

Definition

2.6

Zassenhaus

condition,

are

[23,

p

are

isomor­

to an A-

be g i v e n by m u l t i p l i c a t i o n by a unit

in the same

224]

We

JZ(S)

m a n y S - i s o m o r p h i s m cl ass es .

in

t h e n they are

are 0 - ideals w h i c h

for e v e r y p o s i t i v e

t

R-order

isomorphic 0-latices,

is the total q u o t i e n t rin g

and

mo s t

the m a x i m a l

The 0 - i s o m o r p h i s m exten ds

Cns

if,

denote

class.

i s o m o r p h i s m w h i c h mu s t of

0

and

p h i c 0 - l a t t i c e s.

A

is the m a x i m a l

= Q[A]/(f^(A))

Each

A

0

is finite.

Proof

0 = 01 ©

If

ideal

say that

holds

integ er

of

0

class.

[]

the Jo v d a n -

for an R - o r d e r t

, there

of S - l a t t i c e s

[Theorem

exist

having

S

in

fi ni te ly

R - r a n k at

32

We wi l l

sh ow that

field.

S in ce

l at ic e s

of R - r a n k

similarity

Theorem Proof tive

the m o d u l e s

for

Q

a s s o c i a t e d to m a t r i c e s

, this

implies

the m a x i m a l

R-order

Since

0

is m a x i m a l,

every O-lattice

choices

isomorphic M

How ever,

is om or ph is m,

is bo unded,

i s o m o r p h i s m cl ass es

For

Let

t

2.4,

h(0 )

T h e r ef or e,

, JZ(O) M

are

Up

only

f in i t e l y

[]

A = R [ A ]/ (f (A ))

M

A

, JZ(A)

in t e g e r

set of r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s

in

holds.

and let

{L j j . - . j L p }

of 0 - i s o m o r p h i s m cl ass es t

, where

0

embedded

0M

0M = M

Lj

is the

.

M

Since

to

of b o u n d e d R-rank,

Considering

OM =

is

of p o s s i b l e

any A - l a t t i c e of R - r a n k at mo s t

replacing

is p r o j e c ­

is finite.

be

.

holds.

sum of O- ideals.

there

of O - l a t t i c e s

be any p o s i t i v e

R-order

Let

A

the nu m b e r of su mm a n d s

of 0 -la tt ic es w i t h R - r a n k at mo s t maximal

of

holds.

2.6

be a full

in

are o n l y a fini te n u m b e r

for each summand.

Theorem

0

to a dire ct

by T h e o r e m

there

JZ(O)

are A-

a finite n u m b e r

For

of

a global

of ma tr ic es .

and t h e r e f o r e

Proof

holds

2.5

bounded.

i.e.

n

c la ss es

If the R - r a n k

many

JS(A)

in

QM

for some

by a A - i s o m o r p h i c

t

.

, we can form the 0 - l a t t i c e j

,1£

co py

j _< p

, we m a y assume,

if n ec es sa ry ,

that

Lj . Choosing a non-zero

we have

el em e n t

a e R

such that

aO c A

,

33

aLj = aOM Since

Lj

is an O- l a t t i ce ,

R-module.

Since

therefore

Lj/aLj

Q

an R / a R - s u b m o d u l e nu m b e r was

ar bit ra r y,

Proof

2.7

S i n ce

Lj/aLj

of

ible

separable

ity cl ass es nomial Proof

3.

f(A) This

choic es

The

c lass n u m b e r of

factors,

of m a t r i c e s

fi n it e and

M/aLj

is

M

.The

choice

we

[]

A

is finite.

can u s e

2.5 to show

an a r g u m e n t

h(A)

is the p r o d u c t there in

M

of

holds.

holds,

f (A )

is

Ho we ve r,

for

JZ (A)

If

R/aR

, so t he re are on l y a finite

so

JZ(A)

2.8

field,

is a fin it e group.

to the p r o o f of T h e o r e m

Corollary

oM = Lj .

it is a f i n i t e l y g e n e r a t e d

is a global

of n o n - i s o m o r p h i c

Corollary

c AM c M c

si mi la r

finite.

[]

of d i s t i n c t

irreduc­

is a f i n i t e n u m b e r of s i m i l a r ­

Rn

having

characteristic p o l y ­

. f o l lo ws

d i r e c t l y from T h e o r e m s

1.5 an d

2.6.

G en e r a of L a t t i c e s Throughout

quotient f(A)

field

is a m o n i c

this Q

section,

polynomial Set

0

of

l o c a l i z a t i o n of

closure R

The d e v e l o p m e n t genus,

is a D e d e k i n d d o m a i n w h o s e

is an a l g e b r a i c n u m b e r

a s e p a r a b l e Q- al g e b r a . the in te g ra l

R

such that

field.

A =Q [ A ] / ( f ( A ) )

A = R[A]/(f(A)) R

in

at the p r i m e

A

We

.

ideal

Rp p

as s u m e is

a n d d e n o te will

denote

follo ws

the

.

of the c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of A - l a t t i c e s

w h i c h we p r e s e n t here,

by

Roggenkamp

by

[26, VII].

34 Let As

S

be an R - o r d e r

in the p r e v i o u s

Set

Sp = Rp ® S R

Rp-order

and

Definition in the

2.7

section,

a nd

Mp

Two

We

concepts

1.2]. p

Note

Definition of

R

and

r a t he r

coincide also

, it fo ll ow s

.

is an .4-module.

Not e

Mp

su c h that

and

ideals

that

N , are

Sp

Np

are

p of

is an

R

Mp = Np QN

S denote

A p is not

a nd QN

are

.

in terms of pH o we ve r,

as s ho wn

for

to be

isomorphic

than lo ca li za ti on s.

if

said

QM

is o f t e n d e f i n e d

Q M a nd

Let

M and

for S- l a t t i c es ,

that

that

2.8

an S- lat tic e.

, if and on l y if

that genus

adic completions two

M

QM = Q ® M R

= Rp ® M R

M V N

all p r i m e

remark

and

S- la t t i c e s ,

isomorphic A-modules for

Mp

A

is an Sp-latt ic e.

same gen us,

Sp-modules

in

in

these

[26, VI,

even one p r i m e

ideal

are A - i s o m o r p h i c .

the set of p r i m e

a maximal

c a l l e d the set o f c r i t i c a l p r i m e s

of

ideals

Rp-order. R

and

S

p is

is a fin it e

set.

In o t h e r word s, that

Ap ^ Op

Ap = Op

.

For

, w e hav e

A-lattices

M

S

the p r i m e

that

an d

d e f i n i t i o n of genus:

is the set

N

ideals

Q M = QN [11]. M V N

of p r i m e p

implies

Thus we

idea ls

such that M p = Np

,

can r e p h r a s e

if a nd on l y

p

if

QM

for the

a nd

QN

such

35

are A - i s o m o r p h i c p e S

and

and

Np

are A p - i s o m o r p h i c

for all

. We

see that

a genus

A - i s o m o r p h i s m cl as se s Jordan-Zassenhaus 4.5,

Mp

contains

a finite n u m b e r

from the f o l l o w i n g

Theorem.

of

statement

A p r o o f m a y be

found

of the

in

[26, VI,

4.7].

Theorem

2.9

algebra

A

Let .

S

be any R - o r d e r

For W

any

in the s e p a r a b l e Q-

f i n i t e l y g e n e r a t e d A - m o du le ,

the

set

o(W)

contains

= {M |M

on l y a fin it e n u m b e r

It is c l e a r th at

M V N

o(QM)

is an S - l a t t i c e

that

, th en

if

Theorem

2.10

and

using

f o u n d in [24,

Let W

QM = W}

of n o n - i s o m o r p h i c

N e a(QM)

c an be co mp ute d,

p r o o f can be

M

and

.

N

are A - l a t t i c e s

The n u m b e r

the

S- l a t t i ce s.

following

such

of g e n e r a

in

theorem.

Its

173-175].

be a f i n i t e l y g e n e r a t e d A - m o d u l e

and

set

a(W)

= {M| M

is a A - l a t t i c e

Th e n u m b e r

of g e n e r a

where

is

c(W)

hp

in

cr(W)

suc h that

is g i v e n by

Q M = W)

g

=

II hp p eS

the n u m b e r of A p - i s o m o r p h i s m cl as s e s

for

eac h

p e S

Corollary

2.11

Suppose

.

in

.

A = 0

, the m a x i m a l

R-order

in A

.

36

Let Rn

MA

be

the

A-lattice

associated

with characteristic polynomial

o n l y one ge nu s Proof

Since

for all

p

in A

.

f(A)

.

Th e n

A

in

there

is

o(QMA ) . is ma xi m a l,

Henc e,

any A -l at ti ce ,

to the m a t r i x

Ap

is a ma xi m a l

by our p r e v i o u s

N V M

if and on l y

remarks,

if

Rp - o r d e r if

QN = Q M A

N

is

as

d-m od u l e s .

A

fi ne r c l a s s i f i c a t i o n of A - l a t t i c e s

to co un t present apply

[]

the n u m b e r

of i s o m o r p h i s m c la ss es

the d e f i n i t i o n

it

to our

will

enabl e us

in a genus.

for an a r b i t r a r y R - o r d e r

specific

s i t u a t i o n of lat tic es

We

and then a s s o c i a t e d to

matrices.

Definition

2.9

Ti\ro S - l a t t i c e s

in the same r e s t r i c t e d genus, following conditions i)

M

ii)

and

OM

and

A

N

a t e d to

A

.

Set

g (M ) = ( A - l a t t i c e s components al g e b r a s , [11],

of we

ON

are

V N

are

said to be

, if and o n l y if the

iso mo rp hi c,

R-order

in

and de no t e

where

containing

Rn

having by

MA

N|N

^ MA) .

ca n a p p l y

the

are

S

is

as c h a r a c ­

the A - l a t t i c e a s s o c i ­ N|N

V M}

and

S i n c e none of the simple totally definite

f o l l o w i n g result s

in R o g g e n k a m p

0 .

f(A)

0(MA ) = (A-lattices

H o m A (MA ,MB)

as g i v e n

V

M

N

are in the same genus;

be a m a t r i x

teristic polynomial

and

hold.

the m a x i m a l

Let

M

[26, VIII].

quaternion

of J a c o b i n s k i

37 T h e o r e m 2.12

[26,

p 103]

r e s t r i c t e d genera. we can

f 0 .

invariant

Ma

invariant

method

...

Also,

if

G 1 = GS

,

is a unit

d e f i n e d by

find a c o r r e s p o n d i n g

Ag a i n ,

the class

of the

1.5, we

have that

i s o m o r p h i s m class

ideal m a t r i x

of the of

the

ideal

A

ideal

. class

of the m o d u l e

. We

We

In

n c K e -j) ~ 1 g'-.u. i= 1 13 3

,

of the s i m i l a r i t y class

Recalling Theorem is an

G'

.

is om o r p h i s m .

de t( g j j ) an

ideal.

det(GS)

is an

R

m a y be r e p l a c e d by

d e t e r m i n e d by

n 1 Siju j i= 1

=



1 .

=

the

(A - a)g(A) fo rm

f(A)

In that case,

and =

we

refer

s i m i l a r i t y co nd it ion s.

= g(A)h(A)

section

and

the m a t r i c e s

h(A) A

and

has

degree

A r

hav e

2 . bl oc k

and

=

A’ =

(a'jj)

Ai

A.*

1

and A ’j

are

polynomial Ai*

and A \

in R n - 2 g(A)

are

polynomial

h(A)

and A ' 2

are

the

zero m a t r i c e s are A

and

an N>

i j )

o

( a

CM