New kingdom pottery fabrics

Citation preview

NEW KINGDOM POTTERY FABRICS NILE CLAY AND MIXED NILE/MARL CLAY FABRICS FROM MEMPHIS AND AMARNA

.J

Fourteenth Occasional Publication Edited by Pau·icia Spencer

New Kingdom Pottery Fabrics Nile clay and mixed Nile/Marl clay fabrics from Memphis and Amarna

J. D. Bourriau, L. M. V. Smith and P. T. Nicholson

The Egypt Exploration Society 3, Doughty Mews, London WC LN 2PG 2000

CONTENTS Lists of Figures, Plati;s, Tables and Charts

LONDON SOLD AT THE OFFICES OF THE EGYPT EXPLORATION SOCIETY

Lists of Figures and Tables in Appendix 3 Preface and Acknowledgements Bibliography

3, Doughty Mews, London WClN 2PG

vii xi xiii xv

introduction

The character of Nile clay fabricl· and the Vienna System 11w rhi11-secrio11 analysis Dara rrearme111 The format of the report

© The Egypt Exploration Society 2000

A catalogue for this book is available from the British Library

ISBN O85698 149 4

Nile B fabrics: Memphis GI , G2 and Amm·na I: 1, l:3 and I:5

5

Nile H ji1brics Nile BI fabrics Memphis G2 Nile B2Jabrics Memphis GI Amama 1:1 Amanw 1:3 Amarna 1:5 Sw11111ary Nile C fabrics: Memphis G4

13

Nile Cfabrics MemphisG4 Nile D fabrics: Memphis GS, Amarna 1:4 a nd Bread Mould fabrics

15

Nile Dj'ahrics Me111phis G5 Aman,a 1:4 Bread Moulds

Nile clay fabrics with no equivalent in the Vienna system: Memphis G6a, G7

17

Me111phis G6a and G7 Memfihi,1· G6a Memphis G7 Mixed clay fabrics: fabrics 1-4

Set in Adobe Pagemaker 6.0 by Patricia Spencer. Printed in Great Britain by Commcrcial Colour Press Pie, I 16- 122 Woodgrangc Road, forest Gate, London, E7 OEW.

Mixed clay fabrics The ide111ijicatio11 of'a pore11ria/ 111ixed clay group The application of rhi11-secrion data: Chart /, Tables I and 2 Marls Mix11.m's Nile + Limestone Nile Silts Su111111ary

19

vi

CONTENTS Fabric groups and vessel hapcs

27

Vessel shapes shown in Chart 2 Amphorae Meat ./ors and Rowls Jars, Zirs and a Spinning bowl Amama Bread Moulds Amphorae in Fabric G6o

LISTS OF FIGURES, PLATES, TABLES AND CHARTS

31 Conclusions

Figures

Po11e1y fabrirs and tlw study rif' Ne1v Kingdom ceramics The Potter 's paste The Archaeologist 'sfabrics Specialised pollet)' types New Kingc/0111 ceramics at Memphis and Autama

I. 2. 3. 4. 4a.

llar charts based 011 the poi111 count data rabies Appendix I . The samples. J. Bourriau and L. M. V. Smith

49

Appendi x 2. Tables of point-count data. L . M . V. Smith

69

Appendix 3. Statistical analysis of point-count data. L. M. V. Smith

83

5. 6. 7.

8.

Plates

8a. 9. 9a. IO. I Oa. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2 1. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29.

Vessel types from which the Memphis samples were taken. Scale I :4. (W.Schenck) Vessel types from which the M emphis samples were taken. Sca le I :4. (W.Schenck) Vessel types l'rom Amarna. (Copy of fig.5 in Boull'iau and Nicholson. JEA 78) . Sherds 3-6 M emphis G I fabric. Sherds 3-6 M emphi s G I fabric, showing minor components. N ote Y-axis has m aximum value of4%. Sherds 7-8 Memphis G2 fabric. Sherd 1 M emphis G I fabric. 'Twentieth Dy nasty . $herd 2 M emphi s GI fab ric. Twentieth Dynasty. Sherds 18-20 Amarna I : I fabric. Sherds 18-20 Amarna I: I fabric, showing minor components. Note Y-axi s has maximum value of 4%. Sherds 21-23 Amarna 1:3 fabric. Sherds 21-23 Amarna 1:3 fabric, showing m inor com ponents. Note Y-axis has max imum value o f 4%. Sherds 27-29 Amarna 1:5 fabric. Sherds 27-29 Amarna 1:5 fabr·ic, showi ng minor components. Note Y-axi s has maximum value o f 4%. Sherd 5 M emphis G I fabric. Shcrd 29 Amarna 1:5 fabric. $ herd 6 Memphis GI fabric, blue painted ware. $herd 21 Amarna 1:3 fab1ic, blue painted ware. Sherds 10-12 Memphis G4 fabric. Sherd 9 Memphis G4, reclassified as GI fabric. Sherd 13 M emphis GS fabri c. Sherds 14 M emphis GS, reclassified as G I fabric. Sherd 15 M emphis GS fabric. Sherds 24-26 Amarna 1:4 fabric. Sherds 30-32 A marna Bread Moulds. Sherds M211, M29 M emphis G6a fabric. Sherd s 16-17 Memphis G7 fabric. Section M38A M emphis 111 4, recl assified as Mixed cluy fabric 2. Section M62C Amarna 111:6, reclassified as Mixed clay 3. N ote Y-axis has maximum value of26%. Sections M26C, M27C, M31A Memphis G6b Mixed clay fabric I . Section M26C M emphis G6b Mixed fabri c I . Section M31 A Memphis G6b Mi xed fabric I. Section M4H M emphis HI , reclassified as M i xed clay fabric 4. N ote Y-axis has maximum value of 26%.

viii

UST or COLOUR PLATES

UST OF BLACK AND WHITE PLATES

Blnck and white 1>lates

Colour Plates

~

Colour plate I (sherd breaks). I. I: I Amarna (Nile B2) TS 19 x5 (photo Owen) 2. GI Memphis (Nile B2) TS 6 x5 (photo Owen) 3. 1:3 Amarna (Nile B2) TS 2 1 x5 (photo Owen) 4. 1:3 Amarna (Ni le B2) TS 22 x5 (photo Owen) 5. I:5 Amarna (Nile B2) TS 27 x5 (photo Owen) 6. 1:5 Amarna (Ni le B2) TS 28 x5 (photo Owen) 7. 1:4 Amarna (Ni le D) TS 25 x5 (photo Owen) 8. GS Memphis (Nile D) TS 15 x5 (photo Owen) 9. Bread Mould Amarna (Nile D) TS 3 l x5 (photo Owen) I0. Bread Mould Amarna (Nile D) TS 32 x5 (photo Owen)

a. Fabric GI. Memphis. This view shows the distinct zoning of the G 1 fabric from core (black) to exterior (light grey), together with moderately-sorted quartz and feldspar grains (mainly white or grey) ranging up to the coarse sand size class. Field width 5.4 mm. Taken under XPL. Thin-section 3A. b. Fabric G I. Memphis. View illustrating medium-sized elongated voids resulting from burnt-out vegetable temper. Some, such as that near the centre of the field of view, retain relict cell structures of the vegctal material. Field width 2.7 mm . Taken under PPL. Thin-section 4A. Plate B a. Fabric 02. Memphi s. This fabric is characterised by the small grain-size of all mineral inclusions. Quartz and feldspars (mainly white or grey) are largely in the very fine sand and fine sand size classes. The dense texture of this fabric is evident. Field width 5.4 mm. Taken under XPL. Thin-section 8C. b. Fabric G4. Memphis. Area of the section illustrating coarse elongated voids from burnt-out vegetable temper characteristic of 04, together with moderately sorted quartz and feldspar inclusions. Field width 5.4 mm. Taken under PPL. Thin-section tOA. PlateC a. Fabric GS. Memphis. View illustrating characteristic medium and coar e sand-sized limestone inclusions. This photograph also illustrates the appearance of decomposed limestone in thin section, the grains usually appearing mid- to dm·k grey, rather than white to light grey as in the unalten:d state. In the case of one inclusion, near the centre of the field of view, the lime tone is present only as a thin midgrey zone arou nd a void (appearing white). Field width 5.4 111111. Taken under PPL. Thin-section I3C. b. Fabric I:1. Amarna. This fabric has moderately sorted inclu ions. predominantly of quartz and feldspars (plain white or grey) together with a moderate amount of limestone (white with grey veining, top left) ranging up into the coarse sand size class. Field width 5.4 mm. Taken under XPL. Thi n-section 208.

flattl2

a. Fabric 1:3. Amarna. View illustrating limestone inclusions in very coarse sand size (white with grey veining). These occur in J:3 in a higher proportion than in I:l. The other inclusions within the field of view are mainly quartz and feldspars, together with an elongated pyroxene grain of medium sand size on the left hand side. Field width 5.4 111111. Taken under XPL. Thin-section 218. b. Fabric 1:4. Amarna. This fabric has moderately-sorted inclusions, predomi nanlly of quartz and feldspars (white or grey) together with a relatively high percentage of limestone (white with grey veining). The majority of both quartz and limestone inclusion range up into the coarse sand size, with a very small proportion, illustrated by the limestone grain in the lower left hand corner, just within the very coarse sand size class. Field width 5.4 mm. Taken under XPL. Thin-section 24B. ~

a. Bread mould fabri c. Amarna. This view illustrates the generally poorly-sorted texture of the fabric. The majority of inclusions arc quartz and feldspars (white or grey) ranging up to coarse sand size, whilst the limestone inclusions (white with grey veining) have a maximum size well within the very coarse sand size class. Field width 5.4 111111 . Taken under XPL. Thin-section 32A.

ix

Colour plate 2 (sherd breaks). I. G2 Memphis (N ile BI) TS 8 x 14 (photo Owen) 2. GI Memphis (Nile B2) TS 2 x5 (photo Owen) 3. G4 Memphis (Nile C) TS LO x5 (photo Owen) 4. GS Memphis (Nile D) TS 13 x5 (photo Owen) 5. 07 Memphis TS 17 x5 (photo Owen) 6. G6a Memphis TS M29 x5 (photo Owen) 7. G6b Memphis (Mixed Clay I) TS M27 x5 (photo Owen) 8. H 14 Memphis (M ixed Clay I) TS M3 J x5 (photo Owen) 9. G6b Memphis NAA sample 170 x5 (photo Owen) I0. 1-1 I Memphis (Mixed Clay 4) TS M4 x5 (photo Owen) 11. H14 Memphis (Mixed Clay 2) TS M38 x5 (photo Owen) Colour plate 3 (thin sections) a. Fabric 1: I. Amarna. Area illustraling the general characteristics of the Nile Silt fabrics. The main ones arc: reddish-brown clay body, moderately-sorted grains. predominant quartz and feldspars (appearing white and grey), moderate biotite mica (reddish-brown) and small amounts of pyroxene (purple). Limestone inclusions (pale yellow) are present, mostly ranging from the fine to coarse sand size class. C72055 E4 2941. Thin-sect ion no. 18B. Taken under XPL. Field width 5.4 mm b. Fabric G6a. Memphis. A fabric characterized by predominant very well sorted quartz and feldspar grains, main ly in the fine sand size class (mostly appearing white and grey) together with moderate amounts of pyroxenes and amphiboles (appearing yellow, purple and blue). RAT-20 2354. Thin-section no. M28C. Taken under XPL. Field width 5.4 mm Colour plate 4 (thin sections) a. Mixed clay fabric 2 (formerly H 14). Memphis. Area of section showing two pellets of unmixed tine marl clay. The upper one is discrete. whilst the lower one has trails of clay extending from it. This feature is a good indication of clay mixi ng. The inclusions appearing white arc mainly quartz; those appearing yellow are limestone. RAT-88 264 1. Thin-section no. M38A. Taken under PPL. Field width 2.7111111 b. Mixed clay fabric 3 (formerly 111:6). Amarna. Area of the section illustrating the general 'backgrou nd' of silt-sized carbonate fragment (appearing pale yellow) wi thin the matrix . Differing proportions of these appear to be characteristic of the marl clays and of the marl clay/silt mixture. . The main inclusions above sill size include two large limestone grains (exhibiting pale yellow areas) together with quartz and feldspars (white or grey). Thin-section no. M62C. Taken under XPL. Field width 2.7

mm

X

LISTS or TAB LES AND Cl !ARTS

List of Tables I. Percentages of limestone (carbonates) in sill fraction, Lotal limestone and the red iron ox ides in different fabric groups. Total limestone= the count ror limestone in the silt fraction added LO that in the size ranges above silt size. Nile+ Limestone = Ni le sill wares with limestone filler added. 2. Percentages of limestone in the sill size fraction and above the sill size rraction. The figures for the latter were derived by deducting the limestone in Lhc sill size fraction from the total limestone fi gure given in Table I. The sections arc grouped in their final order. 3. Concordance between Memphis and Amarna Nile Clay and Mixed Nile/Marl Clay Po1tery fabrics and the broader l'abric groupings of the Vienna System. Sec p.24 for assignment of individual samples to Mixed Nile/Marl clay fabrics. 4. List of Samples.

List of Charts I. Percentage of li mestone (carbonate fragments) in the sill size fraction in thin-sections ananged according to fabric group: black = pure marls: vertical stripes= pure Nile clays; diagonal stripes= Nile clays with limestone fi ller: white= potential mixtures, Amarna group; hori7,ontal stripes = potential mixtures, Memphis group, except fur M638. 2. Percentage of limestone (carbonate fragments) in the silt size fraction in thin-sections annngcd in order of their percentages and coded according to vessel shape: black= ampho,·ae (cf.fig.3, no.2 1); crosshatched= meat jars and bowls; horizontal stripes = j.u·s and zirs; while = bread moulds (Amarna); w rtical stripes= amphorae (cf.fig.2, no. I0).

FIGURES AND TABLES TN APPENDIX 3 Figures

I. Plol of cases on first lhrec principal components under principal components analysis: view midway between PC2 and PC3 (Memphis GI and Amarna fabrics) . 2. Plot of cases on first three principal components under principal components analysis: view emphasising PC l vs. PC2 (Memphis G l and Amarna fabrics). 3. Plot of cases on first three principal components under principal components analysis: view emphasising PC I vs. PC3 (Memphis G I and Amarna fabrics). 4. Plot of cases on the ftrst two discriminant fu nctions under discriminant analysis (Memphis G l and Amarna fabrics) . 5. Plot of cases on first three principal components under principal components analysis: view midway between PC2 and PC3 (Amama fabrics only). 6. Plot of cases on first three principal components under principal components analysis: view emphasi ing PC I vs. PC2 (Amarna fabrics only). 7. Plot of cases on first three principal components under principal components analysis: view emphasising PC I vs. PC3 (Amarna fabrics only). 8. Plot of cases on the first two discriminant functions under discriminant analysis (Amarna fabrics only).

Tables I. Coll'elations between variables and principal components, indicating the combinations of constituents making the largest contribution lo the principal components (G I and Amarna fabrics). Highest absolute correlations between a variable and a PC i11 bold 2. Statistics lo indicate the appropriate number of discriminant functions 1.0 be considered under discriminant analysis (G I and Am:irna fabrics) 3. Numbers and percentages of cases classified into the various Fabric groups in the classification phase of discriminant analysis (G l and Amarna fabrics) 4. Correlations between variables and discriminant functions, ind icating the combinations of constituents making the largest contribution to Lhe discriminant functions (G I and Amarna fabrics). Highest absolute correlations between a variable and a DF in bold, co1Telations < 0.0 I omitted 5. Correlations between variables and principal components, indicari ng the combinations ofconstiluents making lhc largest conLri bution lo the principal components (Amarna fabrics only). Highest absolute correlations between a variable and a PC in bold 6. Numbers and percentages of cases classified into the various Fahric groups in the classil'iculion phase of discriminanl analysis (Anrnrna fabrics only) 7. Correlations between variables and discriminant func1io11. . indicmlng the combinalions of conslituems maki ng the largest contribution lo the discriminanl functions (Amarna fabrics on ly). Highest absolute correlaLions between a variable and a DF in bold 8. Statistics from tests of multivariate difference under MANOVA (GI and Amarna fabrics) 9. Statistics from tests of multivariate difference under MANOVA (Amarna fabrics only)

PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS T his is the second part of a study of New Kingdom pottery fabrics from lhe Egypt Exploration Society's excavations at Memphis and Amarna. The first part, devoted to Marl clay fabrics, was published in the JEA 78 ( I992), 29-91. Thi s part is devoted to Nile clay and mixed Nile/Marl clay fabrics and was carried out between November I996 and September I997 by Janine BomTiau and Laurence Smith in association with Paul Nicholson. We are gratefu l to the McDonald Institute of the University of Cambridge and the Egypt Exploration Society for the funding necessary to carry out the thin-section examination. The McDonald Institute has also provided essential equipment, laboratory and office space. Our work has been discussed at all stages with Pamela Rose (Amarna Project) and Peter French (Late Period pottery special ist), who provided invaluable comments on an early draft of this report. The authors also acknowledge the help with the iclcntiftcation of minerals and other inclusions given by Dr. J. Bun bury and Dr. A. Chapman of the Department of Earth Sciences, Dr. C . Oppenheimer of the Department of Geography, Dr. A. Powers-Jones o f the Cambridge Phytolith Project in the McDonald Institute and by Dr. C. A. I. French, Dr. H. Lewis, Ms. K. Milek, and Dr. C. Knappeu of the Department of Archaeology in the University of Cambridge. We are grateful to the Department of Archaeology, Cmnbridge, for the loan of a point counter. For advice and help with statistical analysi , we thank Dr. P. Callow of the University Computing Service and Dr. N. Brodie of the McDonald Institute, Cambridge. T he authors' intention was to submit this report for publication in the Jou ma/ of Egyptian Archaeology where U1e first part appeared. However, the report became too lengthy for a periodical article and the Egypt Exploration Society suggested that it should be published as a separate monograph. As a result U1e authors have been able to present their data in ful l. This is important because it allows readers to as css for themselves the val ue of such studies. The authors have tried to demonstrate the limitations as well as the advantages lhey offer.

BIBLIOGRAPHY A . E. Adams. W. S. MacKenzie und (H arlow. 1984).

. Guilford, Atlas of Sedime11ta1y l?ock.1· 1111der the Micms,·01u'

D. A ston. · Pollery' in M . Raven, 71,e Ttn11h o{ l111·t1d~{ (London/Leiden. 1991 ) 47-54. D. A. Aston, Di,, Gmh1111ge11 des Pl'ii;:,ae11s-M11.1·e11111s Hildesheim im Qo111ir-Pi-Rm11esse. Band I . Die Keramik des Gmb1111gsplatze.1· QI. Tei I I Col]J//S of Fabrics. Wares and Shapes (Mainz. 1998). D. Aston and D. G. Jeffreys. Survey of Memphis Ill: 71,ird l11ter111edia1e Period Levels wul Porre,y lll Kom Rabi 'a ( in press). D. Arnold, Tel'h11iq11es and Tmdirio11s of Mw 11(fac111 re i11 11,e Po11e1:v ofA11cie111 Egvpr. Fascicle I in D. Arnold and J. D . Bourriau (eds.) An h11md11('(/011 10 rhe Study of A11cie111 Egyptian Po11ery (Mainz, 1993). Bell ido el al. (furthrnming) =A. Bellido, J. D. Bourriau, N . Bryan and V. Robinson, Chemical Fi11ger-

1,ri111i11g rf Egyprian Porrery Fabrics: a Co111pariso11 berween NA A grot1pi11fis a11d the Vie1111a System. J. D . Bourriau. ' Relations between Egypt and Kenna during the M idd le and New Kingdoms' in W. V. Davies (ed.) Efiypt and Africa. N,,bia f,vm Prehisto,y to Islam (L ondon, 199 1) , 129-44. J. D. Bourriau and D. A. A ston, 'The Pollery' in G. T. Martin, The Tomb-Cl,apel.,· 1f Pasera11d Ra'ia at Saqqara (London. 1985), 32-55.

J. D . Bourriau and P. T. Nicholson. ' Marl Clay Pollery Fabrics of the New Kingdom from M emphis, Saqqara and A mama.' in The Jo11mal of £gyprirm Archaeology 78 ( 1992), 29-91. A. Brack and A. Brack, Das Gmh des Tja111111i. 1'l1eba11 Grab Nr.74 (M ai nz, 1977). E. G. Ehlers, Oprica/ Mineralogy. Vols. I, 2. (Palo Alto, 1987). N . R. J. Fiel lcr und P. T. N icholson, 'G rain size analysis of archaeologica l pollery: the use of' statistical models' in A . M iddlc1on and I. Freestone (eds.), Rece111 Developments in Cem111ic Pet,vlogy (London, I 99 I ) 7 1-1 I I . Ka1hryn 0 . Eriksson, 'Egyptian Amphorae from Late Cypriot Contexts in Cyprus' in Stephen Bourke and Jean- Pau l Descreudres (eds.), Trade, Co111ar1 and thA

.8'.!

1.44

.29

l. 67

1.04

3 . 83

• ?6

4 .17

1. 89

4.33

.58

,JJ

,58

.17

. 29

.33

.29

.17

.29

19.:n

1. 26

.G'I

.58

1.67

1.04

MF

. t?

,29

,))

.29

1.~J

2,17

2.50

FOX CP

1.80

3 .33

2.02

1. 67

• 17

.

.,

.,o

C:Al, MF

CAL

·"

. 17

15,67

. 29

14 ,!>0

l.BO

13.83

2.57

17 ,IJJ

2, )l

.50

. 50

1 . 50

. ,o

1. 50

1.00

l.17

1.04

GRG

FOX CP

17 . 00

1.32

10.17

2 . 08

ll.33

1.04

. Bl

·"

2.17

1.76

2.67

l. 44

1.00

GHO

OP

3.17

1.76

].67

.SB

4,33

l. 26

5.50

AM

. ·n

·"

,17

·"

.,o

,50

.50

PY

1.00

,87

3.00

1. 32

.!ii

·"

1. 50

. 50

,50

OLV . 1·1

EP!

·"

ZRC

. 17

·"

RUT

,17

.29

OP

5.00

l. 50

1. 67

.,9

3.00

1.32

3.50

AM

,17

. 29

.50

.50

,ll

,29

.50

PY

.50

·"

.29

2 , 17

, 76

,17

. 29

. 50

,50

2.00

l. 50

OLV

, 17

·"

EPI

, l7

.29

.17

. 29

, 17

,29

ST'

1.8J

. 76

RF

l.00

.50

7.RC

RUT

SPH

SPH

SER

,))

.29

CHL

Sli:R

CHL

COR

.17

. 29

COR

VGL

VGL

VRF

VRF

CH SP

,r,·1

KF

1 . .13

·" .,a

,))

,58

,17

·"

1.17

1.26

1.50

·'"

,50

, 17

...

CH

.29

OAN

OAN

OPL

OPL

STP

STP

Pf'iD

FEO

HH

SH

.ll

·"

·"

.))

.,.

CLAY

51,00

5,20

4] .17

J . 79

s1. ~o

4,29

49, Bl

2.47

CLAY

4 ).1'1

2 .02

4A.OO

1.ao

!'>5. ~o

6.0G

42 . 67

4.A6

lNCL

49.00

!,.20

56,83

3,79

46.50

:Lit;1

'>0,17

Z,47

rNC'L

56.AJ

2.02

52.00

1 .80

44 .so

G.OG

57 . 33

4 .86

Percentages of inclusion types encountered during point counting of all the sections, with the percentage of clay body and the total percentage of all inclusions combined (continued).

Percentages of i nclusion types encountered during point counting of all the sections, w ith the percentage of clay body and the total percentage of all inclusions combined (continued).

APPENDIX 2. TABLES OF POTNT COUNT DATA

78

APPENDIX 2. TA BLES OF POINT COUNT DATA SHERO OR Sf.C1'ION NUMBER

SHF:RD OR SECTION NUMBER

Ml A Me.;1n

Std DtlvbL!on

"'"

M2C

Mean

SLd Deviation

Mean

79

M26

Md Std

Mann

Mann

Std

St.cl

MP.i'Ul

Deviation

D8vbtion

o~vi.,t:lon

M:.'l'I

M29

M28 Me1:1n

SLO

Deviation

Std Deviation

Mcurn

St.d

o~vi;:ition

12.00

7 .so

12. ~0

17,67

, 58

QTZ

16 ,50

4.8:il

10.00

·"

20 . 00

L;o

21 67

KP

1.00

LOO

1.00

1. 67

.58

KF

.67

,58

.Al

1.04

1.1:H

1.04

2 ,17

.SB

PLU

1.00

,SQ

1.00

,17

.29

'""

.50

.1'!

,2'

l. 83

1.1.5

1.50

.50

1.00

1.00

.SJ

,'/(,

Q!T

1.))

, 76

J.8)

. 58

2.50

1. "12

. 17

.i,

rv

,J]

·"

18,67

6,05

LIM

.67

. 76

CAL Ml'

OTZ

QrT

PV LIM

31.50

CAL

.50

MF ,'.>O

36 . 50

21.00

.so

.50

.ll

.SA

.50

1.00

.50

.87

.n

.,,

.so FOX

9.00

11.50

16.00

1),83

1.53

CP

1.50

.50

l.50

:a,J]

. 76

2.00

3,00

l. 50

3 . 00

2 .29

.B

.,

OHO OP AM

PY

.50

L.50

OLV

. ~o ,17

.

,29

.so

f:Pl

t,Jj

,'/6

,50 12.33

1..00

,. qo

,50 1,53

.50

.so

,!JO

• JJ

·"

.50

.50

.50

,67

.76

20 . 50

2. 78

.33

.29

·"

2,H

1.15

,,u

,50

FOX

8.83

.76

8 . 17

1. 4~

7.6?

.n,

lj,)J

. 76

CP

l.33

. 76

.67

,76

\.t,J

1.26

2.1?

.58

OP

7.1'1

l, 76

4,50

, 50

5,17

,29

3 .so

. 50

AM

, 17

,29

,17

.29

.ll

.29

,Jl

·"

PY

,67

, 58

.17

. 29

.50

.87

1.1·,

,29

OLV

.17

.29

.17

·"

OHO

EPl

ZRC

Zltt.:

RUT

RUT

SPH

srtt

SER

SER

CttL

CIIL

COR

COR

. 17

...

VGC

Vt.it.

,17

,29

VIU'

VRF

, 67

.29

CH

.50

.50

.JJ

. 58

ar RF

,\'I

CH

·"

,17

,29

SP

,SO

1,04

.50

.l7

·"

, 50

RF

OAN

01'.I


FEO

l'ED

Sil

SH

.6'/

.so . 50

.50

1.00

.50

.67

.SA

2.1?

·"

2.Al

1.:.?6

• jJ

·"

.JJ

·"

,l'I

,2!1

1,H

CLAY

39.50

lG.SO

40,50

38.50

.50

Cl ,AV

4 6,fl"I

l.Ol

4fl.8J

4,07

5) ,00

2

.oo

50.J)

l . BB

lNCL

60 . 50

6l,',0

59,50

61,50

.50

rncL

l,J

.JJ

2,02

51, 17

4.07

47 .00

2 .00

49.67

l . AB

Percentages of inclusion types encountered during poi nt counting of al l the sections. with the percentage of' clay body and the total percentage of all inclusions combined (cont i nued).

Percentages of inclusion types encountered duri ng poi nt counting of all the sections, w ith the percentage of clay body and the total percentage of all inclusions combined (continued).

APPENDIX 2. TABLES OF POINT COUNT DATA

APJ>ENDIX 2. TABLES OF POINT COUNT DATA

80

$HERD OR SP!CTION

l:lHERD OR SECTION NUMBER

NUMBER

Mll M9tln

MlOA SLd

M9/ln

Dev11111ti0n

Eotd Deviation

MS1

s,d

Hean

Hear\

""

Oeviotion

M6 IR

s,d Std

Hlilan

Deviation

Deviation QTZ KP

PLO

0I'r

l?.83

4,86

8.00

11. l)

1.61

9,00

2.50

1,67

.29

1.00

.so

,50

1.17

,29

,8)

:i .,o

.,. 1.50

33 1.00

• l7

.29 .29

PV LTM

ll.83

2.02

:il0.00

21.00

,.so

.83

,33

.

·"

.,

,33

.29

21.50

il,18

7,50

KF

1. 50

PLO

.so

QIT

1.50

PV

LIM

CAL MF

QTZ

.,o

.so

.10

2 ,17

1.SJ

2.00

.so

.8l

58

.so

.so

.50

.17

,29

)4.00

CAL HF

1.00

.50 FOX CP

11 ,00

2.1H

is.so

14.50

4.33

14.17

:.!.02

.ei

1.04

4 .';,Q

1.17

. 76

1.00

,SO

GRG QP

5.67

,·15

2.00

AH

,67

.29

.so

PY

l.17

1.15

1.83

.67

,76

.59

. 17

,29

2.6?

, 76

.17

·"

,8)

• 76

!'OX

9.50

CP

4.00

ORG

3.50

OP

1.00

AM

OLV

PY

EPT

OLV

RUT

ZRC

srH

RUT

SER

SPII

CIIL

SER

co,

CHL

VOL

.17

·"

.17

,29

COR VOL

VRY CH

.JJ

VRF

.58

CH

SP

.,

,50

EPI

Zkt

• 17

·"

,17

.29

,17

,29

SP

OAM

"'

or1.

01\N

STP

OPL

FED

STP

SH

Fl:':0

.50

CLAY

44 17

7.42

46.50

45.00

4,00

45.ll

l.JJ

SH

INCL

'1!».H1

7.4:il

'>J.50

'35,00

4.00

SIJ,67

],l)

CLAY

34.~o

lNC.:L

65.50

Percentages of inclusion types encountered during point counting of all the sections, with the percentage of clay body and the total percentage of all inclusions combined (cont in ucd).

Percentages of inclusion types encountered during point counting of all the sections, with the percentage of clay body and rhc total percentage of all inclusions combined .

81

APPENDIX 3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF POINT-COUNT DATA L. M. V. Sm ith Introduction

Having uggcste