146 89 259MB
English Pages [380] Year 2001
STUDIES IN MODERNITY AND NATIONAL IDENTITY
Sibel Bozdogan and Resat Kasaba, Series Editors
Studies in Modernity and National Identity examine the relationships among modernity, the nation-state, and nationalism as these have evolved in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Titles in this interdisciplinary and transregional series also illuminate how the nation-state is being undermined by the forces of globalization, international migration, electronic information flows, as well as resurgent ethnic and religious affiliations. These books highlight historical parallels and continuities while documenting the social, cultural, and spatial expressions through which modern national identities have been constructed, contested, and
reinvented.
Sibel Bozdogan | Modernism and Nation Building: Turkish Architectural Culture
in the Early Republic |
SIBEL BOZDOGAN
TURKISH ARCHITECTURAL
CULTURE IN THE EARLY REPUBLIC
University of Washington Press Seattle and London
Publication of Modernism and Nation Building is supported by a grant , ee
from the Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts. | Publication is also supported by a grant from
the Institute of Turkish Studies, Washington, D.C. ,
Copyright © 2001 by the University of Washington Press Printed in Singapore Designed by Trina Stahl
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bozdogan, Sibel.
Modernism and nation building : Turkish architectural culture in the early republic / Sibel Bozdogan.
p. cm. — (Studies in modernity and national identity)
Includes index.
ISBN 0-295-98110-S (alk. paper) ISBN 0—295—98152-0 (alk. paper) (pbk.) 1. Architecture—Turkey. 2. Architecture, Modern—20th century—Turkey. 3. Nationalism and architecture—Turkey. 4. Turkey—History—1918-1960. I. Title. IL.
NA1368.B69 2001 | Series.
| 00—069048
720'.9561'09041—dc21
The paper used in this publication is acid-free and recycled from 10 percent post-consumer and at least 50 percent pre-consumer waste. It meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.
To my parents, Necla and Mehmet Bozdogan, children of the early republic
BLANK PAGE
Contents
Preface + ix | Introduction: Modernism on the Margins of Europe . 3
1. First Moderns: The Legacy of Ottoman Revivalism -. 16
2. Inkilap Mimarisi: Architecture of Revolution . 56 3. Aesthetics of Progress: Imagining an Industrial Nation - 106 4. Yeni Mimari: The Making of a Modernist Profession . 153
5. Living Modern: Cubic Houses and Apartments - 193
6. Milli Mimari: Nationalizing the Modern . 240
Conclusion . 294 Notes +» 305 Bibliography ~. 341
Figure Sources - 349
Index +. 357
BLANK PAGE
Preface
J BEGAN CONTEMPLATING this book more than ten years ago in Turkey when I was doing research on the late Sedad Hakki Eldem. If I had stayed in Turkey as I had always thought I would (one never knows!), I probably would have been intimidated by the immensity of the task and put it aside for other, more focused projects. It was only after I found myself “settled” in the United States (still a tentative concept for me) that the idea became more urgent. First, it became professionally important for me to locate myself in what I saw as an emerging scholarly field encompassing the study of transnational and cross-cultural histories of modern architecture and their relationship to culture and politics. Second, and equally important, was a personal dimension: working on this book became my connection to the country I had left behind and never stopped thinking about since then. Every new development in Turkish culture and politics, every new book on Turkey, and every trip there each summer reflected back on my research material, giving me new interpretive insights and delaying the completion of the book. In the end, the making of the book was spread over many years, many fragmented periods of research, many seminars, conferences, and informal discussions in which the ideas were elaborated, and many moments of doubt over the feasibility of
such an all-encompassing cultural and architectural history. Many people have become part of it in different capacities—as resources, as interlocutors, or simply as
supporters who did not hesitate to place their trust in someone with architectural training who was turning cultural historian. It is impossible for me to list or remember everyone along the way. But with my sincerest apologies for any unintended omissions, I would like to thank the following institutions and individuals.
Most of my research in Turkey was done with a grant from the Social Science
Research Council in New York, and I thank everyone involved for supporting my proposal. Additional funding for research expenses came from a Humanities and Social
Sciences Research Grant and from the Ford International Career Development stipend, both at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In Ankara, at different times between 1994 and 1999, I used the resources of the Middle East Technical University, Ix
——— x - Preface the Chamber of Turkish Architects (with special thanks to Bayar Cimen), the National Library, the Prime Ministry Archives of the Turkish Republic, and the Library of the
Turkish Parliament. In Istanbul, I relied on the resources of Istanbul Technical
University, Mimar Sinan University, and the Atattirk Library of Istanbul Municipality. In the United States, in addition to the Rotch Libraries and Visual Collections at MIT, I consulted the Weidener and Fine Arts Libraries of Harvard University, and I thank the Aga Khan Program for facilitating my access to them. The Department of Architecture at MIT reduced my teaching load for a semester during the writing of the first
tion of the book. , | , , draft, and I thank Stanford Anderson for that. I also thank the Institute of Turkish Studies in Washington, D.C., which provided a subvention grant for the final publica- __
My deepest gratitude goes to Diane Ghirardo, Gilsum Baydar Nalbantoélu,
Gwendolyn Wright, and Yildirim Yavuz for reading the manuscript carefully and critically, making helpful suggestions, and above all encouraging me at the most needed moments. An anonymous reviewer also read the manuscript and gave much-appreciated comments. In addition to them, I want to acknowledge my indebtedness to Inci Aslanoglu not only for reading an initial draft of the first part and sharing her knowl-
edge with me but also for installing in me an interest in the topic many years ago
through her own work. Sarah Shields and Aydan Keskin Balamir also read parts of the first draft and made insightful comments, and I thank them warmly. Among my colleagues in architecture, I am grateful to Roy Landau, Kenneth Frampton, Francesco Passanti, and Akos Moravanszky not only for their general interest in and support of
my work but also for the inspiration their work has given me toward a critical histo- , riography of modern architecture. I also thank Stanford Anderson and Mark Jarzombek for reading the manuscript and for giving “transnational and cross-cultur- , al histories of modernism” an important place in the History, Theory, and Criticism section of the Department of Architecture at MIT during the years I taught there. Some of the ideas in the first chapter of this book were developed during those years at MIT, in a seminar I co-taught with Nasser Rabbat, and I cherish those exchanges. I would also like to express my appreciation to Maristella Casciato, Bernd Nicolai, Vittorio M. Lampugnani, Guiseppe Semerani, Jorge Francisco Liernur, and Augustus Richard Norton for the recognition they gave my work by inviting me to give talks on modern Turkish architecture. Among my friends and colleagues in Turkish studies,
Feroz Ahmad, Ayfer Bartu, Alev Inan Cinar, Haldun Giilalp, CaSlar Keyder, Sevket Pamuk, and Jenny White were particularly supportive over the years. I owe it to them that I was able to present earlier versions of this work to interdisciplinary audiences
as lectures, conference papers, and published articles. OO
Above all, it is the graduate students with whom I have worked or exchanged ideas in seminars and conferences who have given me the greatest enthusiasm and motiva-
tion in writing this book. The larger field within which I have situated my work on Turkish modernism—a field that spans the history of modern architecture outside
Preface »- xi ———— Europe and North America—has been our shared theoretical terrain. It is through the work of these younger scholars that the field is growing rapidly and challenging the traditional conceptions of the discipline of architectural history, theory, and criticism. Among them, I want to express my appreciation for the work of Esra Akcan, Ritu Bhatt, Asia Chowdhury, Ahmet Ersoy, Nathaniel Fuster-Felix, Yehchin Hsu, Brian McLaren, Alona Nitzan-Shiftan, Anoma Pieris, Panaiyota Pyla, Maha Yahya, and Zeynep Kezer. I also wish to thank Aslihan Demirtas, Omer Kanipak, Yael NavaroYasin, Nese Yesilkaya-Guirallar, and Zeynep Ytirekli for sharing their work on different aspects of early republican culture and architecture with me.
Among the people who helped me with the production of this book, I thank
Necati Yurtseven in Turkey and John Cook in Cambridge for responding to my end-
less requests for photographic reproduction over the years. Many others generously ,
allowed me to use individual photographs from their collections; I have acknowledged them separately in the figure sources. My sister, Hande Bozdogan, not only kept me sane and smiling with long overseas phone calls but also was a reliable resource for any material I needed from Turkey. My very special thanks go to Michael Duckworth, the editor of the University of Washington Press without whose commitment and support neither this book nor the larger series in which it appears could have been possible. The same goes to Jane Kepp, the talented copy-editor who did marvels with my manuscript, making it possible for me to finally visualize it as a book rather than the draft of a potential book. As much as this book is indebted to the many people who intersected its path at different points in fruitful ways, the writing of it was ultimately a lonely enterprise.
Most of the time I wrote it “on the side,” during the time left over from full-time
teaching and parenting. It took much longer than it should have, its progress fluctuating with the ups and downs in my life and career, and it was finally finished under circumstances dramatically different from those in which I began writing it. Throughout all this, a few people have been so indispensable to my well-being that I want to single them out, with full knowledge that whatever I write will be insufficient to express how much I appreciated and needed them. First, I thank Feridun Ozgéren for opening up the world of Turkish classical music for me—a world in which I found refuge and relaxation when nothing else worked. Second, I thank Leila Kinney for being the intelligent colleague, great girlfriend, and walking companion that she is. She, too, was trying to write a book between full-time teaching and parenting, and with her there, it was less lonely. Third, I thank Resat Kasaba, my colleague and co-editor, my best friend of nearly thirty years, and the single most important contributor to the con-
ception, elaboration, and realization of this book. In his immense generosity and
kindness, he listened to every idea I ran by him, read and commented on every paper I wrote, invited me to his conferences, and read the manuscript a few times over. Above all he believed in the importance of writing a book of this sort when I myself
had doubts. “Rethinking modernity and national identity in Turkey” became our
————— xil + Preface shared obsession in our separate but parallel lives in the United States. Fourth, I thank Peter Parsons, who listened patiently to my ideas and challenged them in constructive
ways, read my drafts, helped me out on a daily basis, and endured my moments of depression with grace. As colleagues and intellectual companions, we learned, discussed, and taught “the culture and architecture of modernity” together. In addition, I always turned to his capacities for handling practical matters that would have left me helpless and to his overall wisdom in life whenever I seemed to lose my sense of purpose. Finally, I thank our son, Sinan Bozdogan Parsons, who, for the first ten years of his life, grew up with the making of this book and still does not blame it for all the time I would otherwise have given to him. Sibel Bozdogan Brookline, Massachusetts January 2001
MODERNISM AND NATION BUILDING
BLANK PAGE
Introduction MODERNISM ON THE MARGINS OF EUROPE Some time ago, by the “Sweet Waters of Europe” at the far end of the Golden Horn, | heard the whine of countless gramophones on the caiques plashing the water. And | reckoned that Abdulhamid was dead, the Young Turks had arrived, that the Bazaar was changing its signs and that the West was triumphing. And already today we have Ankara, and the monument to Mustafa Kemal! Events move fast. The die is cast: one more centuries-old civilization goes to ruin. —Le Corbusier, L’art decoratif d’aujourd’hui, 1925
For Le CorsusikER, the making of modern Turkey over the ruins of the Ottoman Empire was just one example of what he saw as the disappearance of balanced, harmonious cultures everywhere with “the arrival of the twentieth centu-
ry.”' He dated “the advent of modern times” in Turkey to the appearance of the Young Turks on the scene, just before his own first visit to Istanbul in 1911.” He observed that what the Young Turks had started then had been carried to its logical conclusion by Mustafa Kemal, the nationalist hero who proclaimed the Turkish republic in Ankara in 1923, dismantling a six-centuries-old Islamic civilization. Indeed, the new republic had recently passed its most radical and, to this day, most contentious decrees, abolishing the Ottoman sultanate and the Islamic caliphate. A series of Westernizing institutional reforms was under way to shape the entire social, cultural, and architectural
fabric of Turkey along European models. It was only a matter of years before Le
Corbusier himself would be hailed as a great visionary and his works and ideas would mobilize a new generation of young Turkish architects. 3
————— 4 . Modernism on the Margins of Europe Why, then, do Le Corbusier’s words have such a melancholy ring? Many Western commentators writing in the 1920s expressed ambivalence toward the new nationalist government in Turkey, if not outright nostalgia for Ottoman culture and society.’ Although Le Corbusier shared the general orientalist nostalgia, his agenda was a different and personal one, little related to the historical events under way in Turkey. While evoking the necessity and historical inevitability of the disappearance of old civiliza-
tions, his nostalgic remarks were intended mainly to draw attention to the loss of “harmonious cultures” everywhere and to justify his own mission to re-create that lost harmony in the modern world. During his first visit to Istanbul in 1911, like other European orientalists before him who went to the East in search of the “exotic” and the “authentic,” Le Corbusier had despised the modernizing agenda of the Young Turks, including the new architecture they sponsored. Instead, he had admired “the simplicity of their fathers” who had built the classic mosques and the wooden houses of old Istanbul—those “architectural masterpieces,” as he called them, the spatial and constructional qualities of which he registered in his mind and in his sketchbooks. As recent scholarship on Le Corbusier confirms, in those formative years he was looking at the cultural artifacts and vernacular architectures of eastern Europe and Turkey as conceptual models for
a possible modern vernacular.* They were his sources of inspiration to begin contemplating the possibility of a similar harmony, this time between twentieth-century culture and its designed objects. Yet in the official modernist polemic of the 1920s. and 1930s (to which Le Corbusier himself significantly contributed), these “nonEuropean” cultural influences became merely anecdotal. Instead, the ocean liners, grain elevators, and airplanes of the industrial West took center stage as the exclusive sources of twentieth-century modernism. The official history of modern architecture was written in the West with Le Corbusier as its main author and protagonist at once. According to this account, which has become a part of the mainstream cultural history of the twentieth century, “modernism,” or the “Modern Movement” as it was then called, encompassed a revolutionary aesthetic canon and a scientific doctrine in architecture originating in Europe during the interwar period. Use of reinforced concrete, steel, and glass, the primacy of cubic forms, geometric shapes, and Cartesian grids, and above all the absence of decoration, stylistic motifs, traditional roofs, and ornamental details have been its defining features in twentieth-century aesthetic consciousness. For most people, the works of masters such as Le Corbusier, Walter Gropius, and Mies van der Rohe epitomize this modernist aesthetic. Its European origins notwithstanding, it is a doctrine that has claimed universal validity and rationality. The new needs, tools, and technologies of complex industrial societies that informed this modernist vision were presented as the needs, tools, and technologies of a rationally progressing universal history—an epochal force that no nation, culture, or geography could escape. The most effective organization working for the dissemination of these ideas was the International Congress of Modern Architecture (CIAM), which inaugurated its
Modernism on the Margins of Europe »- 5 ———— annual meetings in 1928 in Europe. A year before that, a major housing exhibition in Stuttgart, Germany (the Weissenhof Siedlung, 1927), had given a unified image and great publicity to the leading modernist architects of Europe. In 1932 the movement crossed the Atlantic Ocean, and the term “international style” was coined for this
architecture after the famous exhibition by that title at New York’s Museum of
Modern Art. In a very short time during the 1930s, the architectural and urbanistic precepts of the Modern Movement were embraced by an entire generation of architects, planners, and bureaucrats everywhere as the most progressive and thoroughly rational expression of the modern zeitgeist in the making. As we will see later in this book, its arrival in Ankara, the new capital of modern, postimperial, republican Turkey, was celebrated as a historical moment marking the country’s entry into the twentieth century. The greatest ideological appeal of the Modern Movement was its claim to transcend ideology. During the interwar period, many new regimes and diverse political systems, from socialism in Weimar Germany and postrevolutionary Russia to fascism in Italy, Zionism in mandate Palestine, and Kemalism in Turkey, embraced the progressive discourse of the Modern Movement. Republican Ankara in the 1930s was one of the earliest manifestations of the historical alliance of modernism with nation building and state power—an alliance from which the term “high modernism” would be born. By the time high modernism reached its epitome in the post-World War II
period, it designated not so much the particular aesthetic canon of the Modern
Movement (which gave way to new, more monumental, and more sculptural forms after World War II) as its larger political project. Le Corbusier was, without doubt, the mastermind of high modernist vision in architecture and urbanism—“the revolutionary architect par excellence,” as most of his contemporaries and many Turkish architects of the 1930s saw him. The proliferation of the high modernist vision beyond the margins of Europe to other continents and cultures, from postcolonial India to Latin America, shaped much of the history, culture, and built fabric of the twentieth century. The new capitol complexes of Chandigarh and Brasilia are only the most ambitious and famous of its numerous expressions in architecture and urbanism.° As James C. Scott notes in his compelling account of high modernism, the term is not confined to architecture and urbanism. “High Modernism is the most visionary and ultimately devastating ideology of the twentieth century,” Scott explains, “a particularly sweeping vision of how the benefits of technical and scientific progress might be applied, usually through the state, in every field of human activity.”° That high modernism tends to simplify reality, making it legible and ultimately controllable, and that it sees the past as an impediment to the realization of an idealized future are two of Scott’s observations that are particularly pertinent to an analysis of Kemalist Turkey in the 1930s. There are certain conditions, Scott argues, that have particularly favored the blossoming of the high modernist faith. These include “crises of state power, such as wars and economic depressions, and circumstances in which a state’s capacity for relatively unimpeded planning is greatly enhanced, such as the revolutionary conquest
———— 6 + Modernism on the Margins of Europe , of power and colonial rule.”’ The presence of both of these conditions in Turkey at the time modernism “arrived” in Ankara cannot be missed. The country had barely emerged from decades of warfare extending from the Balkan Wars and the First World War to the nationalist War of Independence. The construction of a new nation had to be accomplished in the midst of dire economic conditions, not to mention the impact of the depression of 1929. Finally and most importantly, after the consolidation of single-party rule under Mustafa Kemal’s Republican People’s Party (RPP), there was a new revolutionary regime in power with an all-encompassing project of moderniza-_
tion and civilization at the top of its agenda. ,
With its predilection for social engineering and top-to-bottom modernization and its self-declared revolutionary premises, the Kemalist regime embraced the high modernist faith as one of its founding ideologies. The architectural culture of the early Turkish republic amply illustrates how high modernism as an ideology appealed par-
ticularly to “planners, engineers, architects, scientists and technicians” who “wanted ,
to use state power to bring about huge, utopian changes in people’s work habits, living patterns, moral conduct and worldview.”* Modern architecture was imported as both a visible symbol and an effective instrument of this radical program to create a thoroughly Westernized, modern, and secular new nation dissociated from the country’s own Ottoman and Islamic past. In this respect, architecture in early republican Turkey can be looked at as a literally “concrete” manifestation of the high modernist
vision. ,
In this book I offer evidence for the essentially ideological appropriation of modernism in Turkish architectural culture of the 1930s. At the same time, I address how this imported ideology was interpreted, justified, modified, and contested in ways unique to the Turkish experience. The architectural culture and production of the early republican period bear ample testimony to the ambiguities, complexities, and contradictions resulting from encounters between imported ideas and local realities, not just in Turkey but everywhere. This book is also about these complexities and contradictions, which make it problematic to explain the Turkish case (or any other case,
for that matter) exclusively from the general high modernist blueprint. | The “New Architecture” (Yeni Mimari, as the Modern Movement was called in Turkey) came to Turkey in the 1930s largely through the example of German and Central European architects who worked and taught in Turkey throughout the early
republican period. Their more conservative brand of modernism, which can be
observed in the architecture of Ankara (mostly a stripped-down classicism), bore little resemblance to the canonic aesthetic of “international style” in the 1930s (with its slick, white boxes, transparent walls, and advanced industrial materials). The dis_ course celebrating Turkey’s entry into the heroic world of the Modern Movement notwithstanding, modern architecture in early republican Turkey was conspicuously heavier than the celebrated examples of the Modern Movement in Europe. Buildings
were constructed more traditionally, with smaller openings and, in many cases, |
pitched tile roofs, largely as a result of the poverty and constraints of the building
Modernism on the Margins of Europe »« 7 ———— industry. Modernist Turkish architects were themselves profoundly contradictory in their comments about modernism. Sometimes they privileged its aesthetic component (as is implied by the term “international style”) by celebrating the “harmonious composition of geometric volumes.” More often they rejected the stylistic implications of an aesthetic understanding of modernism in favor of the principles of “rationalism and functionalism,” which, they believed, were the objective and scientific criteria determining modern form. Mostly they tried to reconcile the two. As much as young Turkish architects wanted to embrace the Modern Movement, in the passionately nationalist climate of the early republic the word “international” was even more objectionable to them than the word “style.” In the same way that republican leaders wanted to import the positivism, science, and progress of modernity without its liberal philosophy or its socialist overtones, republican architects
wanted a modernism without its international connotations. As will be evident
throughout this book, the entire architectural culture of the early republic was one big effort to reconcile the “modern” with the “national.” Some argued that because the Modern Movement was the most rational response to site, context, and program, it was, by definition, “national.” As a corollary to this, others argued that traditional Turkish architecture (classical Ottoman monuments and vernacular houses) embraced such rational designs in terms of function and construction that it was already “modern” in concept. Analogous to (and inspired by) the way Italian rationalist architects
elaborated the concepts of “Italianita” and “Mediterraneita” to appropriate mod-
ernism for the Fascist state,? Turkish architects tried to “nationalize the modern” for a better ideological fit with Kemalism. Any study of early republican architecture in Turkey needs to take into account this ambiguous and very particular sense of what “modern” was all about and resist the tendency to read modern Turkish architecture in terms of exclusive binary oppositions between national and international or between tradition and modernity. At a time when any emphasis on either supranational or subnational affiliation was anathema to republican ideology, modernism could not be international in its affiliations, nor could national architecture be truly local, traditional, or regionalist. Both the European modernism of the 1930s and the idea of a “national style” that had been a recurrent obsession in Turkish architectural culture since the late Ottoman period are important backdrops for this book. It was the specific ways in which the two interacted and negotiated in the 1930s, however, that gave early republican architecture its unique character. One central idea informing this book is that a distinction should be made between modern architecture and high modernism, counter to the tendency to collapse the two together. Modern architecture, as it first emerged in Europe around the turn of the century, was before everything else a critical discourse that defied received notions and established canons of architecture. It commenced from the idea of exploring a critical, antistylistic, and continuously self-transforming approach to art and architecture, irreducible to an official style or program in
the same way that modernity is irreducible to the grand political project of high
———— 8 ~. Modernism on the Margins of Europe
modernism. As Scott puts it in the context of social theory, “one of the great paradoxes of social engineering is that it seems at odds with the experience of modernity generally. Trying to jell a social world, the most striking characteristic of which
appears to be flux, seems rather like trying to manage a whirlwind.” !° The same could be said for modern architecture. To turn it into an official style and ideology—simple, legible, and recognizable as such (geometric, undecorated, abstract building forms)— seems very much at odds with its theoretical premises, which emphasize formal inde-
terminacy, response to context, and response to changing needs, materials, and techniques. Therefore, the initial identification of modernism with nation building
under the auspices of an authoritarian state in Turkey is itself problematical—a premise waiting to be questioned rather than taken for granted.
®©©|
THE HISTORY OF modern architecture and urbanism outside Europe and North America is a relatively recent and rapidly growing field of research. Until the last two decades or so of the twentieth century, nineteenth- and twentieth-century architectures in Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America were topics doubly marginalized, not only by historians of modern architecture but also by area specialists. As is widely known and discussed today, the reasons for this had much to do with the ini-
tial constitution of the discipline of art and architectural history on primarily
Eurocentric and orientalist grounds." For many art historians in the so-called area studies, non-Western cultures were interesting mostly insofar as they remained “others” with respect to the West. Thus their attention and scholarly specialization were focused heavily on the classic periods or “golden ages” of Islamic, Indian, Chinese, and other cultures. Modern architecture was regarded as an imported and “alien” discourse not indigenous to these societies—a much-lamented symbol of the “contamination” of their authentic cultural expressions. Little attention, if any, was devoted to the efforts of non-Western cultures to make modern architectural concepts, forms, and techniques originating in Europe their own. “Modern” was assumed to be an exclusively European category that non-Western others could import, adopt, or perhaps resist but not reproduce from within. In the case of Turkey, not only twentiethcentury modernism but also the histories of Ottoman baroque, neoclassic, and other European architectural imports of the nineteenth century were, until recently, little known to an English-speaking readership.” Much of area studies has been predicated on a belief in the essential differences between cultures. Twentieth-century modernism embraced the opposite—a belief in
the essential “sameness” of human beings as the scientific, objective, biological underpinning of what were to be inevitably uniform modern lives. Consequently, neither perspective has helped much to open up a space for the study of modernism outside the industrialized West. Area specialists and orientalists have looked at non-Western
cultures as strictly “bounded domains,” the essences of which were in the past.
Historians of modern architecture, on the other hand, have focused exclusively on the
Modernism on the Margins of Europe . 9 ————
social, technological, and intellectual determinants of modernism, the sources of
which were in the West. Hence they have regarded modern architecture and urbanism in non-Western contexts simply as extensions of Western developments and therefore as of little interest and originality in themselves—unless, of course, a famous European architect or planner happened to be working in some overseas territory. Until the fairly recent appearance of publications on India’s colonial heritage and the work of modern Indian architects, for example, what was known about modern architecture in India was confined to Le Corbusier in Chandigarh.
In the aftermath of the critique of orientalist and Eurocentric perspectives in nearly every discipline, the foregoing picture has been changing dramatically. Orientalist constructions of “other cultures” as timeless and essentialist categories have been radically challenged at least since the publication of Edward Said’s ground-
breaking work in the late 1970s.8 An entire new field of cultural studies has emerged, drawing attention to the hybridity and complexity of non-Western societies, “modern” in their own ways and not necessarily following the patterns delineated by the history of the industrial West. At the same time, critical histories of modern architecture have also been dismantling the idea of modernism as a thoroughly rational and universal doctrine that the architecture of every nation would sooner or later emulate. The scholarly trend now is to expose multiple and heterogeneous trajectories, even within European modernism itself, not to mention hitherto unexplored contexts and countries from Latin America to East Asia. As a result, the last twenty years have seen a boom in scholarship and published literature on the plurality of modern experiences, histories, and cultural transformations of non-Western societies. There is a wealth of new research on colonial architecture and urbanism, modern architecture and national identity, and postcolonial architecture.'* This book is informed by these studies in many ways and was motivated by, among other things, the conviction that such studies of “other modernisms” challenge not only essentialist categories of nonWestern cultures as static but also assumptions of a linear, homogeneous, and universal history of modern architecture. Looking at different experiences in different places and circumstances is the most effective way by which we can ensure that modern architecture, traditionally reified by both its supporters and its opponents, becomes historically situated, contextualized, and, most importantly, politicized. It is not surprising that the categories “power” and “politics” have been at the center of much of the work in this field, because it is through these categories that asymmetries in cultural and architectural history emerge most clearly. The primary reason for the privileging of politics is a simple one. In most countries outside western Europe
and North America, modernization was not a profound societal experience resulting from the nineteenth-century “great transformation” into an industrial, urban, and market-oriented order.’ It was an official program conceived and implemented either by colonial governments or by the modernizing elites of authoritarian nation-states that most of the time placed a high priority on architecture and urbanism as a form of “visible politics.” In Turkey, too, from the reformist bureaucrats of the Ottoman
—————— 10 . Modernism on the Margins of Europe Empire in the nineteenth century to the republican leaders in the 1920s and 1930s, successive generations of modernizers sought to “catch up” with Western civilization and progress by importing Western institutions, forms, and techniques. Architecture, by its very nature, has always been a powerful symbol as well as an effective instrument of
reform and change in the modern world. As a result, modern architecture in nonWestern contexts has often been a representation of modernity without its real mate-
rial and social basis—namely, industrial cities, capitalist production, and an
autonomous bourgeoisie. _ Although one can rightly argue that modern architecture has been a representation of modernity and a foil for modernization everywhere, including the industrialized West, this process has nevertheless been far more evident and transparent outside the West. As a result, the study of modern architecture in non-Western contexts compels us to go beyond traditional categories of art history, formal analysis, or discus-
sion of “origins,” “influences,” and so forth, and to delve into the historical and
political contexts in which forms acquire meaning—which may be different from their
original meanings in the West. Traditional assumptions about the “autonomy” of architectural form (which have been under critical scrutiny everywhere for some time now) are even more conspicuously contested by the example of “other modernisms.” With the proliferation of studies of the latter, the emphasis has been shifting from architecture as an autonomous, self-referential discipline to what we might call the politics of architecture. While the top-to-bottom character of modernization in non-Western contexts inevitably brings the issues of power and politics to the forefront of architectural history, it is also important not to read the history of modern architecture exclusively through the lenses of current critical perspectives focused on power and politics. In this book I hope to make a more nuanced assessment of the modernist vision, discriminating between its critical premises and its ultimately authoritarian implementations, between what it meant to its contemporaries and what it means to us today. Modern architecture in non-Western contexts, or anywhere for that matter, may be seen as a form of cultural and environmental oppression imposed upon people by bureaucrats, architects, and planners—as indeed numerous cultural critics have seen
at least since Jane Jacobs. '* Power, however, is not only about oppression but also and literally about empowerment, and it is the factor of historical agency associated with the modernist vision that has made it so appealing to non-Western nations—nations
that for centuries were cast as “ahistorical.” New nation-states such as Turkey and many postcolonial governments in the twentieth century initially adopted modern architecture and urbanism as what they perceived to be statements of national inde-
pendence, pride, and progress. Whatever our retrospective critical assessments may be, to its contemporaries modernism was an expression of the desire of “other cultures” to contest their “otherness” and to claim subjectivity in making their own history. In this book, my approach to the architectural culture of early republican Turkey is informed by an awareness of the profound ambiguity of the modernist project of
Modernism on the Margins of Europe . 11) ———— the 1930s, including its modern architecture. Perhaps there is a personal and generational explanation for this. Unlike the generation born into the early republic—my
parents, my teachers, and the first generation of historians who studied modern
Turkish architecture and to whom this book is greatly indebted'!’—I can maintain a critical distance from that period in order to see through modernism into the authoritarian politics. I can question the republican modernist vision with the hindsight of all the developments, critical ideas, and scholarship of the last two decades. I can take issue with its larger claims to scientific truth and with its mandate to transform society for the better and to construct a thoroughly transformed future largely dissociated from culture, context, and history. '® At the same time, I am equally distanced from the emerging younger generation
of architectural historians who have been focusing, with much critical force and insight, on the ideological programs and authoritarian politics of early republican architecture.'? Unlike most of these younger scholars, I have caught the tail end of the
republican vision through personal memories—family outings in Youth Park, the Ataturk model farm and forest, and the Cubuk Dam in Ankara—the legacies of
republican public space that I discuss later in the book. I lived my childhood and youth within the lingering legacy of the Kemalist project, just before the dismantling of the ethos of the early republic and the demolition or transformation of its most representative physical spaces after 1980. Perhaps as a result of this relative historical proximity, I still take the optimism, energy, and excitement of the early republican architects to heart. I am fascinated by their heroic feelings of nation building and history making, which come across in contemporaneous documents, testimonies, photographs, and publications. Such evidence suggests to me that, emerging out of a highly popular nationalist war of independence and conceived by the hero of the war, Mustafa Kemal Atattirk, Turkey’s modernist vision was more popular than is typically suggested by other cases of high modernist social engineering “forced upon” traditional societies. Interestingly, James C. Scott did not include Mustafa Kemal in his “Hall of Fame of High Modernism,” which features other famous figures from Saint-Simon and Lenin to Robert Moses and the Shah of Iran. I believe that, without negating the high modernist legacy of Kemalism, there are good historical reasons to justify this exclusion. Deified as a secularist and Westernizer by many Turks, detested for the same reasons by others, but ultimately revered as a soldier and national hero by all, Atattirk left a legacy that continues to be one of the more complex and enduring legacies among twentieth-century modernizers and nation builders. The Modern Movement may have been conspicuously out of place in a war-torn, traditional Muslim society without the industrial infrastructure to justify its aesthetic and constructional precepts. Yet its introduction into Turkey was elevated to epic proportions in the architectural culture of the 1930s. It was hailed as the visible proof that Turkey was a modern European nation with no resemblance to the exotic and orientalist aesthetic tropes by which the Ottoman Empire had typically been represented in the past. Like Salman Rushdie’s Indian immigrant in a Western metropolis who is
———— 12. Modernism on the Margins of Europe “a disguise inventing his own false descriptions to counter the falsehoods invented about him,” the modernist vision of the early republic embodied “as much heroism as pathos.”2° I hope my account conveys these ambiguous and simultaneous feelings of both pathos and heroism, of both state power and popular empowerment, of both alienation and liberation—feelings without which modernism loses its richness and historical complexity.*! That the current cultural climate in Turkey is increasingly more polarized between a staunch, uncritical defense of the republican modernist vision and an indiscriminate condemnation of its Westernizing, secularizing agenda testifies to the importance and urgency of accounts that complicate the picture.
®©©
FINALLY, SOME METHODOLOGICAL notes are necessary to explain the sources and
structure of this book. As is evident from its subtitle, the concept of “architectural
culture” has been central to it.” Very simply, the concept of architectural culture starts from the premise that one should look at architecture not as an autonomous, self-referential discipline interested in forms and form-making alone, but rather as a larger institutional, cultural, and social field with important political implications. The concept of architectural culture implies a cultural historian’s approach to the buildings, projects, and architectural texts that collectively constitute a “discourse” about architecture, in the original sense of this helpful but now clichéd term. The architectural culture of a particular place and time includes all the institutional practices—archi-
tectural schools, publications, exhibitions, competitions, and professional associations—that produce, reproduce, discredit, or lend credibility to discourses about
architecture. A cultural approach does not mean that architecture can be reduced to discourses about architecture or that buildings are unequivocal and transparent expressions of the ideas that are claimed to have informed them. Most of the time the most prolific producers of the discourse (such as Aptullah Ziya, Behcet Sabri, and Bedrettin Hamdi
in the Turkish scene in the 1930s) are not the most prolific or the most interesting designers of the period (such as Seyfettin Arkan or Sevki Balmumcu). In other cases the two functions overlap in the personalities of individual architects (such as Zeki Sayar and Sedad Hakk:i Eldem). Yet even then their published writings, theories, and programs fall short of fully explaining their built work or revealing the tacit agendas, unacknowledged influences, and simply personal aesthetic choices involved in their designs. More specifically, the doctrines of rationalism and functionalism that are at
the center of the official discourse of modernism often prove to be no more than ,
clichés that leave out the complex cultural, aesthetic, and personal considerations that go into the making of the best modernist work. The idea behind the study of architectural culture is not to explain the work through what was said and written about it but to see the ways in which what was said, written, and built collectively confirm, interpret, contest, or negotiate the political and ideological agendas of the time. As the foregoing tenets of the cultural approach suggest, the primary sources for
Modernism on the Margins of Europe .- 13= ——— this study were contemporary publications and visual sources of the early republican period, as well as the surviving buildings and surviving people. I surveyed the most representative official, professional, and popular publications of the “long 1930s.” I took this quintessentially Kemalist “long decade” to span the period from the graduation and professional organization of the first modernist Turkish architects in 1928 to the architectural competition for Mustafa Kemal’s mausoleum in 1942, the symbolic closure of the early republican period. With the utopian modernist vision of the
Kemalist revolution at its height at home and the establishment of the Modern
Movement as the dominant aesthetic and ideological canon abroad, the 1930s constitute a particularly fascinating decade with a strong visual component, to which con-
temporary photographs testify. The historical overlap between modernism and
techniques of reproduction, photography, and advertisement in Europe has been the topic of many recent studies.” The Turkish scene in the 1930s affirms the importance of these new means in disseminating a visual culture of modernity mostly by the agencies and publications of the state. Thus contemporary photographs, postcards, and posters were also consulted, and in many cases they have been as important and informative as published textual material. Although the architectural research for this book was focused on “the long 1930s,” the larger cultural and political framework within which the research is meaningful spans the period from the Young Turk revolution of 1908 to the end of the RPP’s single-party regime in 1950. There are many good reasons why there is a clear definition and coherence to this larger period, not just in architectural history but in the history of modern Turkey in general.** The overarching reason that concerns the structuring of this book is the strong ideological grip of Turkish nationalism on all aspects of politics, life, and culture throughout this period. For this reason, four chapters focusing on modernism as an aesthetic canon of the Kemalist period proper are bracketed by an introductory chapter looking at what came before modernism and a final chapter looking at what followed the rejection of the modernist canon. Taking issue with the common tendency to divide the architectural history of the early republic into stylis-
tically defined periods—that is, a succession of “national” and “international”
styles*—I regard the continuity of the nationalist framework as the defining feature of early republican architectural culture, regardless of stylistic shifts. The thematic ordering of the book follows a loosely chronological structure, but each chapter stands on its own in exploring one component or theme in the architectural culture of the early republic. The first chapter reviews the legacy of the Ottoman revivalist “national style” that preceded modernism in Turkish architecture. The casting of this style as modernism’s academic, stylistic, and anachronistic “other” constituted the first high-modernist gesture that depicted the past as “an impediment, a history that must be transcended” and the present as “the platform for launching plans for a better future.”** The rest of the book offers historical context and evidence for three important and recurrent terms that collectively summarize the aspirations of early republican architectural culture: “architecture of revolution” (inkilap mimarisi),
——— 14 . Modernism on the Margins of Europe “new architecture” (yeni mimari), and “national architecture” (milli mimari). The primary question that preoccupied early republican architects was how to find an architecture that embodied all three attributes at once.
Chapters 2 and 3 address the meaning and implications of the term inkilap
mimarisi (architecture of revolution)—a key term designating an idealized but largely formless quest of the early 1930s. Chapter 2 looks specifically at the official discourse through which modern architecture came to be the primary visual expression of the republican “revolution,” as it was called, and shows how modern forms were mobilized to serve the ideological agenda of the regime. Chapter 3 focuses on the significance of the industrial and technological icons of modernism in the revolutionary consciousness of the republic and in the specific discourses of progress and civilization espoused by Kemalism. It highlights parallels with and divergences from the ways in which the modernist avant-garde in Europe exalted the same technological icons. How the professional discourse of Turkish architects—their struggle for legitimacy and state commissions and their particular readings of modernism to strengthen their professional claims—took shape around the term Yeni Mimari (“the New Architecture”) is discussed in chapter 4. Chapter 5 then looks at images and ideas of the modern house, the most paradigmatic domain claimed by modernist architects everywhere in the 1930s, as well as the symbol of the republican desire to extend the “civilizing mission” of the Kemalist reforms into the private realm. Nowhere is the ambiguity of modernism more evident than in the architecture of the house (mesken mimarisi, as Turkish architects called it). On one hand, it was a theme that symbolized the democratic potential of the New Architecture, whereby architects could claim service to “the people” rather than to wealthy patrons, states, and institutions. On the other hand, the perception of the house as a means for reforming lifestyles epitomized the penetration of the state, through experts, architects, and planners, to the traditionally resistant domain of privacy, family life, and domestic order. — By the late 1930s, nationalist attacks on modernism had already intensified in Turkey, portraying its abstract, geometric forms as the mark of an alienated, individualistic, and cosmopolitan society. Chapter 6 focuses on the intensification of the milli mimari (national architecture) debates in the late 1930s, discussing how vernacular building traditions—especially the timber “Turkish houses”—were appropriated by modernist architects in an effort to “nationalize the modern.” It also looks at how, after the death of Mustafa Kemal Atatiirk in 1938, the more “futuristic” revolutionary spirit declined, giving way to the influences of contemporary German and Italian
nationalist trends in architecture and to the inspiration of Central Asian and pre-
Islamic Turkish monuments. The resulting departure from the modernist aesthetic of the early 1930s toward a more classicized and monumental modern architecture representative of state power and nationalist historiography is covered in this last chapter, bringing this heroic era of modern Turkish history to a close. One of the major difficulties of writing a book of this nature and scope has been the question of the multiple readerships that I wished to engage with it. First and most
Modernism on the Margins of Europe - 15 = ——— obviously, I expect this book to be of interest to my own disciplinary constituency— namely, historians of modern architecture. Second, I expect it also to appeal to area specialists—to those in Turkish and Middle East studies in this case. Third, I hope that an even larger interdisciplinary and nonspecialist audience concerned with questions of modernity and national identity in general will find it interesting and inform-
ative. It was frustrating at times to write with all of these constituencies in mind. (Does one explain who Le Corbusier was for nonspecialist readers outside the field of
architecture? Does one give basic historical information such as the date of the proclamation of the Turkish republic for readers unfamiliar with the history of Turkey and the Middle East?). But what ultimately transcended the fear of compromise on each side was the conviction that something rich and original can come out of a cultural history of this sort—insights that can be gained only by crossing the boundaries between architectural history and area studies everywhere.
First Moderns THE LEGACY OF OTTOMAN REVIVALISM
Since young poets started to compose in the modern meter and since some novelty fans started to conduct Turkish saz music with a baton, a notorious
medrese architecture, which we do not know what to call, has proliferated among our architects. Domes reminiscent of the turban taken off the head of the religious fanatic have started to mushroom under the Turkish sky.
mimari]. ,
Hotel, bank, school, ferry landing, all are now a caricature of a mosque, missing a minaret on the outside and a minber inside. . . . This kind of
return to the past is a degeneration, a reactionary architecture [murteci —Ahmet Hasim, Gurabahane-i Laklakan, 1928!
COMPLETED IN 1909, the Central Post Office in Sirkeci on the tip of Istanbul’s historical peninsula is an impressive monumental building designed by the Turkish architect Vedat Bey (fig. 1.1). It incorporates a number of stylistic references to classical Ottoman architecture (pointed arches, ornate tile work on the spandrels
above the arches, domes over the corner towers) in an otherwise conspicuously European building. The use of the tall Corinthian order on the upper floors of the main facade and the symmetry and axiality of the plan follow a distinctly Ecole des Beaux-Arts parti testifying to the European training and cultural references of its architect, like those of many other educated Ottoman elites of the time. The building’s most spectacular feature is a reinforced concrete and iron truss structural system that allows a large span over a spacious central hall lit by a glass roof. This central space evokes a feeling not unlike that of comparable European buildings of the time, such as Otto Wagner’s Postal Savings Bank in Vienna (1906), one of the canonic buildings of early modern architecture, completed only three years before the Sirkeci post 16
Theegacy L fO the O ivalism e Ottoman Revivalis seule? COA SP het oo Oe PER ae PSEA nde eae 9 Ove ot ue Gy ih eS aot . ae = > i ~ - ®
RsNae AEBS: LSa POOR aN ates neateseen SeSpee ace ch ReTEEO ee ea eeaeeee BSA IOeee SISoRAEE oat eee aE Aee Rb eA area ea | % \ 7 x Fe \ae\ eK { xHeed - f me |
«3 \ppt ? i} 4 \aN — >xy SN . rey ’4[om 4 + &‘ eee \ ene aX ah ee ee Pa OR mi# by dence oepmremen pete ecco i £ eM A 3
A\ + Sipe ++P ee * reade ‘* 4 “ A,iet ; 4aaa « +. BUR? b\ +EA Sener Seas eee * te oeieot©i 3= if £i
:NRemY \ Licimbeamyensd ony ae 5 eea ee rt , sees ee : SOI . BERS. si Re Ku PCT ihn ad Wn np Se RA
Rechte machine nae ctn tne or aperagen es cacy ata oe TEER OIE. VS ae SO yc ph ae go gl ene oe aI Sikes. # as 8S ON ee ate PM se Sr ge wn eres Sea eae ee a teen ah Secrecy ean oe RE Pe isomer slags Re CO, ona OIC ees OILS. AITRate ERE ad tas ae POE DE LEee eeCNR Re heenRe Se a ER Seecomet ne ee Se OAL Beste Pexpre a Beh geee ee,Anca SS, aes taro ORR aR Beta FERS ORE fe A ieNAS SS ar SSee OS a eeSagas SEERae since PR aee, ere ha DOES iSsPIE SEES SSTiISR Se cee a5 ay Bee RBTos Be rs Se pe ona ee oy eeay PER NS ekae Bes eterRa ete Ee asci Reese a a ene Rete Casco ae LSI otSee OEae. aie BRSBe Se Ce So ce z seaoo Nakita Stitetes nae eeeoo Se Parr niccy Seen irene Die eRe ERR eter Seen, Se ;Pe, ‘NS AN RiTaos AGteconten EN RRR Pepe ETRE aay eRe MRSeee EA Soe RGSS ceeRN be .BR RE Be eS °F Ree * PrSER geGSS ae EAS sae boresa iva eeRREG he agree heeNene SNeWepre Slee tee ae te CER ee OMELET Se ENR EROeRSNe ROS > oh ta Perce ys Spe Sinn, EROS ReeEES eC I Meee esSORE SOROS asiare ee NCS Saw ee cc MEBs ™.pee PR oD. eS esSe sBie, ©os aden AEE Bay eetDiliRS EE ES OS aeLS eines? RS Se ee iteaeens : Score Bei sea Soy gnSaal MMC RSS RS Mage eeeOR oe Setar Be Re ipines peakeke Lge Vee fOS Bose ees COREE SIRS ESSe teag oisSOR SinesRRR hte BeAEs SMR IE temic. Sates ie SE OE AIDS onyee RNco SFShien DN eee eterno oaes
Pee emtet tsON kereR LE ROS Pom nee Resconese se meas: > Saee Re IF BER: BSR Feieaero ee Ves oeSoe: Sees: 5REE See ER OL piesSee ESee I re Sa & GOERS cate eens 5 Rasher esSe eeSees SERS BES CE eee Wee: Saree pcBen ne Rete ee Seasde 2Le SoROE ree eon I EERE a ae ‘ se Rees LE eee ea Remo > 3anne Seat Renee Boe See FS PE MN See bee aes eae ees eisBe iee Nila ees ‘ ge|. COP epaod cee see Se Bree ihe at,Seca oN si oan PSN. ch Same es EEeee OR ee peat asStee: ae +cae SON PO ee ees JERR ocean Bates etene hac bia GOR Rea ae aes Seeker RSs Bec es8ee ROBE ee eee see: +att Ree esoe ee eh eae Scns 2oman Seer aeons Rian ene Looe Pe oe naiinet enon PRESS ope nae” sakes nae oop coe eeSo me BR ge SSSs ReSe em eeee ee ose < See ee eeSeer eee Cnn, 3 oe eee be meds, dneiairacnon Seed Bi eeets iene oe ates pede Cenesca i Ubinas core: SeSR Scales See aeeee re SS cee OE 6 aeaeeeee 5 eu OS 2Sie BS ae ee ces oe oe 22 aok Pe eee anaes Octet tie: Dre gone oer Seek ne ee ames aD Pe ere eae Nea Semecancoms RS BS: See BS cs: FR pe sea ne SS. oa SS eee waste mi hee ee Rite ee ek MMR Sie aoats aa aan et Shatin Cimon den ee Re = ae ok x. Be toe one Tg, SMES oR eS a gases ee Sees eee eet ty See ot: PE oe Bean: Cee ere SO aa oe etc Saas 4 S Soe Sl See 55 Bees SSE cet tte Set apcoene ss Leese Sees Pee 8 cee ee ie eee io BUEN CC AS aoe LS OP GLO SI Mn SORES aa et Re ee MSs Re Be 23. See me PR eC oc UR Sent Me OM es 2 2 Ss eee ee ee om Soe RO Be SR. Sore eer nce inant blatant pee apa EL ane Fe es SS Be ieee oe ee oe Seen Ba ees ne BO 4 : Se eee: ee Se a oe Se? Stoconsees ie as Petaaaoe Cee Orcoterie Seats Si ss a eS Po eg 2 ot Se ee Sees aie oe ee ST SeORS enna eaeSP earnSoe WER.oS a eeoe > Seis Siaeae Seceaconthessacs CE EE oe ei Pee eons omens Bera tre ote SSeS eae =EES Ream: SS ee Saas Serine Be Be ee nd ee Bye ee Sa ; 1aLON tsant eet ae Soe s>Sn 8 Fang ee ees Paes Reso poccrries eeeS RE: ae eae Seetcoes Sexe sid ee ee DO ieee tie ees ee Bic eprnocin ee
Gstaad nnyLTwen LE TO RO aR MM. RRO Boots ©ER Soa cae it sot SEIS AS eg oe SSD ON retoh i eee Anes Sia hexane REN OR Ron ee Kan in ER Se GEREN LRM ee me eeene et "th cee ERT oe > LI I SeSe taeSU per Bites BieSee Oise Nan AR th ee roanisnttte RaiaBe te tae e Roeee Pete theeoe enoBee semen Baca a tentccen a at Tso Sonar hee ang ES Seae ORES oo PaRes aaa aRSE aaecea Serge eterna: Mie Gee eRe aoa Bee Rs iter are ag sey LEWore IRIE ae Sob Oy rene ic SS ieee Been ESce NE Sieg Bree sosME, eee ee eebe Sg ONES Nee Ese | eis eagRn betas Ee SOR Re ee haan eee REG OE NOL oatSOR POOR Da Bee : meee? BwPRESS re eeDer ee Sa ene PR:omar Bea We FOa a.” a Gece as se eee Beee RLS hs SS = eae Be ghee teeros rae Rerte Feoeaa, ie ast Thee hares Senne nets BeOR ossRetSR Neatin POOR SeMs ee eM eeeane eeaRo RanaR ge aos RSI, ONS SNaOE oe RS BetReMec iceer Soe nts TERS AL ere tagePree VEEN cere inonce nelegh Meae Saas attiSe eena ats ala SOaires ol tg 2 NO, La Se Pex odes PN ae Se Lat BRNN OR OE IIE i2SeeseaTREE oe Mecease me aeoaeres Bre ae ae tr Re ON wood neta a
Bieter ious icant Mae : aeen oeSeg PSCaMee 2 Cie gt Uinta COtgRe Sua SRSeen INE%OTE eeSNamen SeesSaein are cermern LS hi Seeshe CAIheth IO RSea Rete hector ge hy) Raa So Ceesos eeBeen ONS ree Sag teaes Sar pe iat Re nan sstet Wins aS se fetee RieNe we CeO aie ae eM Deen heh Lop GRADO eat tek eg SOR nied ie3Mites eset eee Pee ee aae BeeNe nt Bohs Menten se nN EEN be cee ee ARO cS pe Me Sate aoe as se GEL ONE OE a OR, Ee SOUT CT Ni i. ite: ROR arene csCe es Pee a Caceres Aas Saenger ain Dine Se Oneae eae eePATER ESR RE SARC MRS eS Seis rege een eee ee ee eee oe Dinter Bee Mig OR. Be ae Sohail: Monat eee Rute NN xosBr Sica Nee Spelt RRR SEeee, aSsSO DR IE gales wR iteres conn etn reSatie aeSen PII Seeirene OePaige SEO Bee tneAN oeSUE reee See Pei Reed piscina cpaaene peaa aReef ree etoe Re CR ERGOT Se SRE es ae Sitie eer arn eeaeEE ues TeeeOe Bt reEE ma eae as cer creas one ol POD ORORE tee Naan CO Oe Cree Net SSR Re ois tt ROR nee al ELEces soeaeae toe: ie aaa Bete eetSc eae, Tatas Senne phe ae ESras SAT Laan SOSL RR Deo SERS: SSR OR 5RONG eet aS aeae Ds dan eS sons SASS eee Recreate ade aEe eno Ac eeOe SESS SORE RCS PON MRR OLpeg Roce teen Suter Fos BURR Ba aig ose ae gma ethic ee a See ae Sn Oe oon Ra SS a ne a 6p OE Se Me oe rg LOE ee ae aaa oe Catena Riehl te. COS Ee OR ii ictal aened Petit POO his BRON ReERaD Nhs Saar cin wen esTS SeOeatReece RN aPe RR pee TOR re, See eects See ee mre me SSS eti aie ene iS en ence TR Bit FO EE SE Sen pee ae AORN EMR RAEN g be eee ONT CaS CSRS a eae cial one Seana BRS ey nea Siting, ee ee gs Si gr oe ee ee rae ie eee tc OER SS NR eS OR ee ia eae OP Nee REN 2 ote Es apes ee BS Semen SR aD eS Sa a ey LEER a Ss Pou nate cent ek eta hae pers SF EO CNPo aN ee Nene ene aneRraceiainne Si tinen eng RAR Ceo 3 oe sea Se ROO ad Re “ae Be romyee Sepri Pe ne SeeORE OT FEiOS ke %ca ip has etre CSSg eSOe eae Gai Reena eSey BEeR SohaOOS SA Re ONE ae ee Rc tines La Seat tances te Saar Oe oe oP ILD See ee a oe Te i ss ge ee os, pan nO: ee Wena eee NO aE Re RACER Piet acee ae BRR 5Pesan ee “Sear Ie Ce ape ioc es, Rees eee tee See DeeeIaaPICO Rea es it pene a Me Rieae elo Sout eine eSRRR seinen : ROS eek gees Be BoaeeS ERGa eeeNO aNe oeket TealEe SE EE IS eeeotal ec anser eS eo ed Wis gute Uke pt RN eRSINR: SOR NeUnaae PT, Ne ip, IE, aiis, MOS IN Sea SeBaers NE USECTR RRR he EER ONec DN ERR ESarea Sees RRO ni bean dente x og ohnIDOE toe oars oe emo ia DE Be eileen SERA ea ROS RE SIGS, NReeORR a RiteERS AERIS cen ig es oeana ‘ asLey Oo BRR SES Reei,Sn inret ecee PeSs i, iene” PRETO xiia eesee oS Orgs eee PSS SseEERE wer nmer moe Ni Deanne neti AN os Benen Acr RS a So See age eae eR eeoene ee corns nen: Bone CIE, EO ee Gs Sey eae Se OAS eS Re De Se eee Si ee YF OR iinMt ORE alesis Rennie Siar a© Be Ce age De eIeeSoM ay ne Ore Ue ngaerenir iain Somers Ra ENA MENS Roe BSeee eeeRP Snare eee Dae oe se earn EeLE SCTE Pf LER eS AIRE OM Gore PMeee SO OEE Tot as Ey AUR os RE SAR ne Ses OER SSS cota RRR eee oe eee Se ee pea oe nn TREN rece 44 Sg BeOS eR lle ing, TO age ES LT 8Pei as IRR > SNS oss senna a estos RRO ers eo SAS ne” ss ae Fea ES aceon gee Be RR tO SR ps EE iin As eae Se Hs Sema. an “Seen eae MRR %, Saeco SENS eee enenmemocerenae cohen eigenenBE Cee aa ot = ma eee. SEP TEF tis:RS poenecas. Scere Rs BR NeeAN. akg: CSG POO fe ERE BRILES Vite, wo Leepiees ee Tae Rate Somes ROSS RSE SESS SS Se SAR ener, Be See ae POL eae Beh eRe ARR Cee Soe OES SSSSS oS SRO 8 Bee TRESS SEera, eo eee Seesattr eee Sree Reilc s oeaseme OE Ce LepT: ee Me Serine agree ee oySs s n° eeSY ee, apie cea ete aE[Se a pes BS arenes ke Pore acuminata ea eee SarakAne Aenea sssrneyibon pA oad nd LES SRSeae Be so Pie ghBerge +t aaaeerie, SOO
ee Eres es BONY SUNS Ss BS Bats Bo a) RERPERS Soe pe oc cae YS ae SoSa eatin ORR NS eR Sa esha ee So heMe 2BOT SEE ee 3. ae ee rere oe7 gee Se Se PSR Re RS =eSERS 2.ORS EE SRSo eros eeeS Sean Ge cree Seorse eelcePe Ren £aN ae.g: Bp esne Io. pam. . AR Se egRe «Sie omar: eee eeoe Bg SoS a POS ME arms SnPe OOee PTA ag Re tates 5 ee PERS RE) SRR EERE Schcccetatta nea cg NO oSSme ai Bee eS OR ee. os iaFie Soap SO BRRS | SRE SR BSc ERG ee So 3 eae Sees Beene Skt a Se ee SR ~ pee LETS egal Bate bes ies 1 ios Sipe ERI ORR... | Snare
PyBS Seay SS ss ae SSRoe SS Re RasPSiieebocns ARES RS pn ty oR, eeSS SeeSSN NCNRE RRS aeoa ee pe ee oe Seren eeeRe ate ep ie Sips, ae ee +A5.Does pBoars SOIEN HOE Saye ceean LI SRO dae sa Ree agpee Nafan: . cs ss Be mi eg er Wha te ii, Sebo teense SeesNas Sdn SEIS ORR SSR SSC ARN Rar IA oes eee Sor Sart % ME ee eSessen
See NS Boe en cone See ES es S RR Ra RRS Vesta LES RouSerato ees Speen ees SPRL eeeegee SR-OK pio napa, atasattateatsetadee Rtge,iter 32 cEoe ESI 2 EE” Ta, REN e wate RS oe ‘ARR SeeBi EneRoose i venSRS Net = WES eeSee SO IRR eSESS Bee Pee Ca nn Some dts ee RRA Dy rs Sete+ Ie. “ DrSaha ¥ 4 Pie mmEE ye aees, 3 tz,TY LEED by eeAO hy Ea ee SE one eg SR SE AS LOE AG: thi Bee Mapaans Recah Repeal BRR SOS Sepa Saas SeaNSSS a ont on See Ssa eet arose sok seesoe ODES A ELD DEIR Me ie Ss Be LSE eat.ReaAP oeP;Y POSAese SE aee rach ns ee SES rah Basaran nesee ve eee ORNS AX Saas EN Sirens acon a Rey PORi? Aig te ge FS aLIa bas IAL a:«6 SCE «a a he tae Cee ee RPE PR Se Ee eennn ESSE eRioe SET Sat os§ae BRE Eee See erKes errs CCAR I ORE +mo I BE aeSeINGE The See gern cens vente RE ee ee NR reSoca Seco esSSSR gCtieSo etSeta BeSe ping fect tA a oes a ee 38naea6bys 4 re a
ee SSSR NARS ESSA SISTER RAEN SS Rw SN RSS Se: Sg ES es aera Ee tie a Fi iii
Reta ets Rainier oe DNSSk Roo NC Senmeeeee Sonchne a ee SSS Bk Se cee>> Seek ee re SnOR Seecae ee ae Ee,eesFes ae Cpl PELE Soereceeae Feoepeat eaecena 5, meaner ance teen Shestnnse eernaa ee cave eS ae ee ceeeeNN LNeae eee eeeeer re ee SSeS Pie Seg Ss SSS rtead Pein «Sars ame a eee ‘RN aoe pittance ee Oe Re gh a Scene een ee biacohs. eRe panbeatc weet smecue Sieieian eee PEAS ges Boe betenen oS ennein. Sa eee Rar ites -TERE ee et PE pee SL tay thos eae ‘ty 4 . mitaratereneonte Geoeis scene eee eR ene NS REA aSoe aleeeeSee ore PETAR Seeks kaPOSE eenres. oe ae OR Ios Bae rke RSagg aeihe isa pepneeSoes Ea A ekg Bee che eIeonee eeeeee ON Rea seBe REE Ss es aay ig eo PON soe agp ee eee RPO tas aa BO otDe OTE CO SMM. SG ORES te tia
: 4egAe:the \ f. é x ’Ke : byl Sy ee Vy | ate7 ok i i E a ae ‘ gd eresGR 4 : 3 oo ii : ct < Pgs cS oa. : eee pean ot i:» ay fo" Bie i? 4" :2eefF esaSeapets arn: ee ae beets Ui Sia s,TLe Sab Sp. Reet we Ld sh oreSe pte? ght eet? Ete ee ELede kk ee eee bsaaue ‘ee i ..JF aCERES eee RN dict Ben aga T oT aPaes Fe WEES SSE Se BEGR ENS ahs ee Pe bs eee Bi Lo Uae age ey cgRy PEM Tere a Re peue lesaSES gesB85 eeeee BPE EPSsoi agesBiesiis eat pe aren ern el Deh ELE EL SeeAAIS eecae apo eae eel 2er=“see as aRi: er ia ; = oe . yee pte Ee re “gong tte ba Ws Se pene Pe COE songs Sida on DPE ag RP a BEER SPY Rs Ree ant oes Jape DS MT Pi Sh Rnles ee oe eee Bode ESE se Sae SN ibs ge tee Lah i ES oe we ued SA CRE ESRI Sg oh eee ig a go ae eee Dos . Poo pee a eee ELS oe ere ea ae WEY ted UE Ek Sa A Sane Es ere ke i BI 8 Se ee Bes Oe pete eee a ee Gee ee ane eae ee Bible GEESE SRE SR aes | eee Po a : cana a
ere ee Stee corte ore reBi ne eeieee aeOe aeee ee Oe eo wee a .pe ee uae rcs ees nee eB PONS aesee ern ee eeee oer gtes ee eee EeoeeeTEBE Bint ge See oa ee ee ee aeaEE arage,_ ae pees eR ns eee eeeeSew ee Ss See encee ga peSeSe ale oe wees .ee_, .#; _ | Wek eee eS Serge ay See peer EEE ss eS vot eee ee 5Pe ee ieatetee ee ee OE So ae
es eeBeen ee aOSs ee°ee SegS ioe, eeea po es=as Gore i ae eee ae Pe ee * : Ae gee es ee Ge ee : &, ee eo ee oo ee es , eeeey2: 2 ; * Boe eee eee TE an Bh} * mee be ee eee ee eg eg Be oer ee wos ee eae pe ee ae Be aa ee SC en rs he Shs eee . eo OF eo. Ee ees aad -gee sae aa oo ee se * 2 Bee Bors Ss ee seh ee A oe é See: eye a fyrenee EERE SEE re . : Pog ee ee eee ae oe : me kA cad page i ao ag men ee _ Ee ae pe 4 By Be oases Ogee, ee ae ee al! caer. pe Po oe ae sade oie ee ee re: oe eee gids ee , a eg Se ee ee ae aeae iPaSe eee SURES eepageeBoeeee ee ei ae ee Ce SP esee Be ee ig SEP oe Beg es oe wageals eh aae hee ti ee ee t, | BE
cS gy SO, Saas ee : oe Le fee
Bees Sas Mot ae Tag 2. cnae eS, Sass ey eR Me ee SN eg e 7 eee DaeSe as eee TN cee Ree seeere piled peice preee | See Seeeee ere ee SURE a4.|:sae SES so earsee eeSe ReeeSens LS se ae Bs ge ee 7; 3aE=e aera Se eSeee rae aeBES Bg ge Re PARE GUA. eer Pa Se ae .
oy :
° we ee a ne pee ee ee ee ee oe My Pes aE ee Oe 6 ee Bp Be oe ot
spas rsae"Thee gaol? ERE axe te es a a Mg eeoepee eee EEeePS i otSegue ¥SeeS po a eeSeee ORE A aeBee eeeeee te Pe eee PEeePace Ge FEES ceretaegeste a cage ae Use Seed es Hy. ea algas AMR ceae peer eeBO SBS STM FSBEEBE Ee Ss 2Saw peePP gee eefonk : * Sa, Fag es eeeee Poeeeea en ae eleee, eeSo EPS ae eee:coe geae
. ie ES Pe Pat ee er Reon ea es gt a Es Foy SF ed 7 *s fan, ce ee ee po ee | ee Pee eo = ‘gee ageing. ° ge isis OEeee ete OF gtge? A onge eeae ee a=ee » se ae eee . Bs, me Eh oe ee Ve ae. ep eeSeg EG ges EG ; &§ Sw EE eeeS fut aae me ee eeeed meee we apart boee Pa edYe egae esee xaor hig8 eS eeae "3gee AEae : # ee . : Ss pene ae PACE eaeee ee TS ;4aBPs eae ge ey a ® aoe Te Fe, * fae ee Ba ee Pee 2ligarse: geeoes ae ae oe a Seo ssaeeee a—_ 2an ; ms, - i“ae an eepe pee ao ae ee rete ee aéie Eos ne
eaLo anna sue ee 2 ee a: :poe 6ee a ~~ a. 3nnaaae See ee Bo ge gee eC ia; aaae 2oeapres eee ;ae “2 -.gee aed Tae area ar foe ie es aaeae PE. 1eeae EES ¢Agree SE =: Oe oS vin ote Poth Sy See eae ampere iewe its, eg ee ix Saks. ae . see Ee ee rRee ee wwii. ge = SeBORE eeee ee BSoc ge :Z a >.”-
$ ee ae . é ae oy iene ” woes £& ae By ieee o ° 5 aed as Hee BESS ae eget % gk eee whee F3 :eee ae > = = 3 gees ee a Bae Ce % Mie bead % : A eee Pe eee Bee Be Sah ;éesfog :eee See i a a oe eS 8 i a a 2 : be oe eS 2 8 ee pag eS oe 3 se ae : ed aa BS Sa bee es. ae ae e4 ‘33f-;-:Eaa,oS ae oe a%ee;a. a7 oe Sng RE ae See4we ae oo 2eSoe. oe;ceae oe Bo” ee
. ES 2 oe ae Bee ee ee a eh xe pee ; 4, Ha, aie ge Ri FE oe": ay "4 A ee
. - - - i eee .
eo pee ie Re Ae #Shey ge=aege San erere{lie soe eePe Baia aBangg. UyBAY i GySTA Ate RARE SmSs sd : : : aette Ha ceee ve *Ba eee oe Bei Bele JB! as $:ieta eee ° ae Bic ome RS: etal ZAT aESP ih cd eS Ey 3a eS gee pees. Sel Hipeedie icoy STEE Might serie bene 5xeer fBees aaTag = aeege en et 2 RE ere 8aeeee pis PE rere ERT DEMOS Ct ePa te Se ee Se ee aeae arn °nee OS DE eet es oe :|a3Cp We ae er _BRE col Se No) aoe
: .s: Ra eis eis, eae ee ‘ ee ee ee oo ee ee eo . er 3 ee hg Ye eS Se ae ee ey iS 2) ee ee ee es. 2; Spee ee zi a 2 Soe Re gn aed 2. "SS ae BUSSE [ogi tg BAB sat = ape
Piasieagee oe saci SE opt. 2 z A : pe eo a ee eee SERS gr ap sin i ree. ee j See 7.SSE 3S oe oS, F eee Pe * eee re peat = Feoo eesSa Oe fs Saoe EE ee aeeee aes: ifeee pp -.Ore eg ~~ i,Soe yen gee eeSere Gat aeae aeSAD . wo ao RTS hg -.pene oaSRRNES ce aiMee = Pead es aBue ‘i=a Hint ai ae 08 epee EC SE eee ae
eee ee ite OES a : ee ee ee a ee ee er eee Tes Paes ls Ia aaa
Ly ae SEsERE ©Sees TEs - Hees bdWP S.* :Pisin od is- aod : - Pos Pont atv 7 Berri ee egwo SL SRS eight : Ber TaBAT A gt aie coe Fes bigs cs “ hfaSyOa Dag Shope PING Jaggi oe sete See dey -
re Boe ee eT eee eel EE EgSierisc Meer gg ent ee eee App EE grit ad Be oh Bledel Breet oe ee ea ar a een ae SRA Si Soe ER a eee
eS aey ee Pre seo eeESSeee a Tee eoye oe eS ee eee eee CAs eeee wire cearareee : ee “Be ssSees 3 ie SScee ee ee ee ee ee BET e ee Rotiee es ee Beeeee hes ee peo ee ORES Re oo on goa Pee caee men aeseee coe a eee ahah oer eeeee oe Shee ee ot eg er ee ee ee Se : ee ee ee TREN ee NE ae ge Ente, ee 1 gt RR PERE ees Se peer oe pray Catan aire aan Eo SEN at eign pe SUR Rs aes Be LEASE Eg eb aere a ee tee HAS ae RE oe a EE Race ey ate ed
ee USA, gg APE a tee a pa eeeeope Goaees Nene nee enepaeBEE nUPiuae eesare Ore rr seeeage ag ceeSS iS Boigags SPEA eyeS ne eR, ERSee SEPubes ERP aSFee ie Site oe i ae ee cee Cae pe eeeot eeaeeeee ee eeargOeeREE ogi e SCI atete ane ee chr satelpsecriuge gigi, Seb! eae eee ae oe toe eee er a ES PEI ealt ogee Gap ad Labi ee CeCe ae Cece Sane ee ee PEO Ee Sees ee re ee! ee ee ee i Bee wees TERROR eB SCRE Sree Son GRE Pee caer ee eee
SAREE Sener eeeofr mare SE eee Alse Aeoe pees Serie Seeejo clecae Seer Eee Ee geSee Re EEN ee TEE ee peERE ee Tle ae AES Le: ceeaee eeeeee a ee ee or ee Beae Oe Se GTS Rie oee eee eeBere uaeeaoegeae aeeeesSe Be wr Ce ee ee Po ee ee eo aAE ee Sah Stee nencee fae tag eeSES eee Meg aesee ee Loe eeOe ee Reece ee Peee eesti: ARRee a hsae a Se ies Be eae gsoe 2g Le ee EU egnatilas SS SEA a SESE fee eS ee oeSS eee Sh ee eeoeESSA BeBe oen eet Ree eeoeas SpeieoR ge) he Se eae geeo eePe eee ie eeee ee ee Bae Se eee 5 ee EE atses So Lia ee age ee ee ee on ee a.ae aeee eee ee ee eee ee ae eee ee EUSG eS Se RS coe ee eS Se fee ee ee ee oe ee ee Seka ec VRS ES eeetae ee oe | ee Hee. eee BS Ee ete 8 Ce peice Bes ee ee ee ee LAPP teat reer a ee ee pS ee ee oe CP oe yee aS Rene era ges ae ee eames Sass Gee tet ae ee ee eee ae Boge pee eo eee epee ae ore Pate gee sei traganien Seat et ee ee Tee Sage Rae eee Ug ee as oe AE ee Re PSH Rs Fase eee ieee S RECESS ae nd BEC St Paar seen ene SERS SE a : pee ees cere
:
es mere eeabegsesee Sees vos Bee pis eesy Fkwegeee 7PELeeEDUCERO SS Ree uae Sateena WegnT ge Beg USA EES Se Be Sa Sake ee ee eea aee ee Se re ee OE ores | sara BiasesEO A oe as ye WAP Rhags Sn EO 0 eA See oe aoie eesee es poe Se teSee Robyeetk VeSEieee pire ea SES! ee we Sn OE sae nies | ESE Ee he fei Pg eee Se ee Cie EUS Be ser eat sy Rue ee Glee ree nets eS Big ee nS Ba a peak ae gh fa thal OE SE ee ee eee gisele 2 . Be a eegee poe caeee pee eeA aeegeRRL atte:atNE eegece Reiehin eee ogARES ot ee eeSORE egies PRs Ea ee eeeBees ae DOpneete. gee Pe. ACLS ee ee eeTE ee eees ate Merce eee Seee ee eeFe. ee eeee ee iter dae Bee tes gE CA ge BR SESEGy S De.his Pe REee EISSS . Sie SMES SET: HESS RS aoe wee or TS tea Se SoPRED ae args eras RESP ORENGa TePea. a paren 3Sores ae eS aesEee cetain ee ee eeeae ciESS ia ae ee eS SSS aneee rsee a Ee eeSe oeSe eeeee ueLee SSDg . eSseoaeTREN Of Oe EERE ee ee ee Be ee Fig AE ee ea socSoe ee ie od SUR GhBagss OE gE ag ee BP eREka rer
.Tn ’
|
SO Sec EES ge SBOE) Po Sg Saat Ae ests Var le SEAS a eg ode abi utenti Ree Renee eens ee ee ee Pace MC age SE 0T P shectact (caste | ERS . Pease ORS eeageSabet bE gras oeiseLee Sie wee Eg ao ee ee aBe dseeaeae seeSULFaENA Sea PRASAD OTDipk Se Wiegie Lo cgh UaeBSS gag Ree en te ahs aHh Se ey eae eee ee pea dhs eer CRUSE Seeee SPRres EN *se Sead RANE anahEY oPPe he | PY Poa ie oso ogee ad Ed 8 UBD Sagepee eian lsSILA Seas esounee esSAU Booth, Sie aaSET eee es eae ES Pramas ceePatent Sanane a eeST Gee Er ai Oa) Sse wes os odie iesSEFeb Beo oeanene eee pe Ooeeete ere eG PCE se ten, ire a 7
woe et ae emaeeeeee ig SS ae eae eesug Ee,EES UBER RR eaeeaEA A ae (esCRM ee eeEA eeeGg eeeoTobese Piece SEeee ne ae BESeebeeae geeSpat 08 Re os Beak, eons ane get ona en
veges iin Se SE aie ogee hae SEE oe EE a ek “Phe Teel sabe weet oe eee te ee caer oe og BLL Se : af Bs ,seme? +eee *ee “ated SIRE Se Sa eeSoy eeleet BUS Ae eCaegae AES Pn . ed foes * aS 8 oH a Sree oe . * .Fee ie(0 aEOaRSE Sas eee ae jee ba gD ene aa Be RON < aeee Se eenee eeOe Biden ee Sag Pe “aee a Sweet ae wl Ripe dS oe eee eehed Sy ea Ce eefoBe Pe .. =Fn 22eotgeil Bes” ttseetek os Band adh gayee RES Cee eeeSe Uae = Fe
- ae:eli:= »: eete *, Sees k. pee RE ene i: ee Pe os Be. Pi cowee bee ieee rss A eosin oT yagi GREE: po ee agit
poe “_ ee ees ae. ae x a See caren SEER RPE oo sary BE Yoy aaaee aSe“% Bae Ain es ee ee eS . BRT TG ae a Oe fe Eo epg ERSS 2 er eee .
eeeeer ae is es we ee ee a Foon ee aa er ee 2 etine eeSes EeeBREE “yk uneSage ‘ pe ee Pee EE EES: ie ee, weasee ME is ig alsa AISeeSie ae ay Sgtetentin : BPs
: toe gee eee en Sees Sea Sc SNe ata . easSS Ra Reese peOS on:SEao - aces < po ree apileigPee ee | Peepeaes ae ed die &, : Pep ae Bese, £ Boas TSi! ie Sees Bree acpa oe 38s 4aches ee MPpee cba eRe Rie,
ae~ -“eee ae CL aeeee a.ee US - ae eee ca oe Seee oe a2ee4?ee ee ee fe —— aege oe eee fta = 2S
I. imr}°ft:Ml . 7 Fi . | : }em .t;C ” hi f .eTapor -E€publIc 7 . | em
pee Boog ee ee ies eas Ho sBehieig: pa ae aes ee *2ase Re ee ae Peete.=tt Pcs . aes wo He pe EY ve 2 esere geSEE aPERRET coreg ee - SE Gee eee& ee PooeaeheORE a ee hs SS 7 as
oeore ee Bade. - HE Ree ae ieee Beg ae :~--
: raeril .
£- 2.4. “Old versus phot graphs from new” a governmen icati 7anh a
;
|
. Le O ; , KEP urke mu petw va Ou Ftiesgut .Es, tween Vi: rison lages of th . outside Ankara.” Righ | ire” and “the model village o ariso “ 7 | ‘Ata -Boulevard, A ” ; ation durin ‘al art : -“Atatiirk Bot roads and transportati
, modernity, orderli _IS high Iignted Inpair earationali :e4secon lonalitage arwi .j | e icn;Yi._and ‘Image
..
Architecture o evolution. : alsot ’ Bee yo EEO ee yess Finer aaa at : awat or sa3Patt :8OS ee J SIS ETE CRUE SEE aA oy .sete er Sct OG 9RE Pe Cs : . iS j -Bee ktBese .erie MEEWEEE GE TSR Riepiers, FfES AES AE Pes: id) Sieer eee 3IS:iter. aail Ger. ag. Sig aA RR ie OES Ae nsORO od SPEa wmee Speeeae SE: 3 soe, aL Lg: REPO «al SR es SPOS tein hehRe OeSEPP ES Tag TP2 ee ee A etotOe ‘ cs eae is pe enEOE rs Peho DP oes EOee RO RE. Sean Pr EDGE EUR SENUT EEO ORES © 2 SERCO QUE tere eae . E: . : : es BS os Bae ge Ee BRA RG i Re ea ee Me See ee The Si ae = ace age 3+go eS 2 PR BOE PL ape gti8.eke ot: :Bee, _ oS & co. en ee ee ean er ee ee ig = ee
ae ee aefee BS.a* aa aie TSE: BRS nage “ weeo aanne et Bee,
- ibis . . oon. eee gets . ee. ee ee
_— feos Re ws eo. . ee Se < / a = . i
atfing ; iaeany er iwo ; .cote oa - es. .£::avee Be .: a. :. -neoean apieae PahPy secs, Be .. E EERE ro::; cir ee . os DoE OE ese spe ;RP Pea eon 5 : 2 28 cat a OR Ba ght ee BE ty ema oc Pe SN ae 2 se ee ee PM ee
te aw a a eect ee a Sue HSS Ao. secs NSS e ee tie Ss hist Sh eave [ties bias SP Epa SSR Poh ae by sae ST ee ie Beef gg ROE RTS FE ET he Aine et TE pos . : -5 Jess
ee ase i UR at iE sa ieee logis fc oA A A Skee Hees Sek al a ES PRS Ss ene a i dS ER A aap recat nes JEEZ Eas OOS eR Rae EE Heian fois ets Sao. foterah (00 Pha Sp OES aSHEL So cA R Seige BROS RCN STOR LL REE eS oken a gE oeaEeeSA eee eee PEI CIES RESTS BN eg SSRN dis aRan: nae aea Bah RCEgh hs aaee ek eSeee. eo ee EES eal ag 2 eesee AESee SAS ERO Po ase RSS EE De Sater de EL ee eA Rs FEE teeaE EE ON Ree ene crRNRN 8NeTRS Fy is Fae ree eeA Sg eeeS|ee SORA Pen e ee eoka Week CLG age te EE oh yg ORE Pe aa Rogier BN are cash EMT GS aay 2 asriah POT gC RRR CCR sis ARR eae Ie ae Gaga a Lee ai SI AY DER SAEED S (ect 7 a pea 5 31 SNC iar eee By ses SY ye Rs Lge’: wd REE Oy
SigNagaaBraco Pn NY a SE as aceeee eaicapeer ee Fees ogee eae a ee ee ee Reehd ure eee 712 FOR Ba Gaate IRE“ae RUG ee ey hat eaten eons BLES ERs PS eee OOM yl satee tis ee a SONU wheeee gu ceed eR IN neee Ee ee es ek
les EMTs ge Pe oo. Ph UEP Tate A5.2 RRSOT ti BAER Co oo ici aCE ELhe 1 AS OE IRS ase Rae BRIER tan peas Se GL EN ohn ERAN ADE RRR elle LOLRE ERae itewre oda iene Begspoe aariabiare PER Sil Be Sa ee ee Wes eeUeAyates CEOS nS NOS ARNE ne rE ORSEPT SY BEERS EBV PIIC ne Oy MLE rg teBs aaRRR Or SY csia eS calSei Miia erieeek ReOn Sere EE eet RG EEBetray ee ueTies | OE SBE 2 aoPgee a
OD eeee resco erfae eeniraee AECL EE SOMES deena Saeed PEF BURGE eG a wa Eg Bg pg ga Aaa RO EO aGee i ene Peas SCE OS eeSON e AEE aeEETSA eta eee Bee ae iege Ore Civ asCRte weCO Ege aege were eeSa Odes Pat orien Gaenyerrae mnie pins mena Onc) Samus HEPES eee ReSee TO COE ee eeaie oe SR EOS SOR SE aa Ae ree ook AEE ASTS ASA A a2a aieree vag Bet MR 50aSee ERRhe Cae ec ieie ea ogee as s eine: ScSaar AR np ecsure SS erSUee cee Ale ei eee S ES eeoe tees aa NCE Tc ES RSE 8rec icici Re Ietal: SRO PN ceehSigg SsNUP iiecaa
iteeoeeeeroamee ee eS a) |no la mea age Rg SE Meme oteSL7VAN 5 oCgeEee eeSee ame oaOUR Es ieee anee : aa ae pe Te es eS:ee ee AUTOS ea eeuEe RM a. gga SECOST,” ne oe EL 7eeneain fs a a ea ee eo oid Ola os pa
vtec” ee.fo Sae e Mia etAE eee 2h eee BM a35he seSRDS ee See US RR SAREE geENE SeOA eae earra IRI 0. she csi acco, oti. REGEN Te IRIE I ee MSE, EICee, TIET Rog eae oore A EE 2:SB RRS EN rises ph he on oi teee eeeae AR os ee Bieiriaie in ies Fr AR aa 4cee Sp Bo Meee eer eePB Ps RRS Pe gar ern oe ee BA eii42So LA ;st-IIE tag eR oo RE RE ROE “Oe vyoi 2eke esoni CR aan ee >Rete or34 BccSe sta;(ene oah rass ae te xe * :. “Ge beCEES See. 5sb EA heRe aleS. natant eeea SBS Re RSet a Boo Selene eee mee ee Bc tipeeain babe gasoos SO Ec ON bee A ouses ieee ESAT seats OE Se a er, peer i. anr peaeee SO Pe. |
a ae=a :: i-: ;. vaaeSith2 e as NT an ER at ae on ce a gs Se eee gh ores wie ca eS : ae 3 ah Fe Eg ee Be : Be a . a 4 part eae ee ee Be SEES oni OS . ve et, : an a
‘wim Oye a. "ge BO Ee eames Be Re - BS fee be ee Diy Be aca pesos, 5 2a eee ee PA LE Ibe yon se og a :esype CE. RRR. HB Se ale?BNSee Boe eR a eS ae ewan aaete era. me * a the } i }#i Pa Agan woe: : '
Seen tee coerce eta + SUESa ="Ms ‘ ae Rs Ba Pony ae CUS SESE ee cena ee Pina bay giles : EBS EF ers WBA he HUES Be EO oe Be FB: € a 33 ot EEE os eae
i ee ee Pee. e Oye cone on ee ES oe ee ” Rees reera gees es mane HISHacer ESE in ie fart bopERB LTEFis a ea . OoBiseelineeres!, SRE Sei si etaed Pe & SHd Ras SEUSS) : Seppe ae ee septs that JPRS LOBRH. beige eee ee ee ae eegga Ses aie i i ae ee mere Sees ea SiG ese UMMC ear oe, CHEE sh | oe RES a j py es [ae 200 ie Biase sieeee pb Metiig cic ahi Bae TUE Sie an Beery ne ey eres a wba. Baibeec sore: P ee ae PS ena”: capeees eT SEU MM alte Rls Seed PRESS oi ith Nghe SUE ISD IED ee eee Pape aD . brie i 7 a SERRE 2 HRS ei
Gee age ee pissed, LE ae ee : SB cagh a ph pee re ae & 7 ERS : ge
Rita nh Bo eid ESTEE ors cS eee 2 BRERS aati ne > f ee es ee i Lad EEESEREE oe Hie sete 2 SE Sa Saaecatt . mug ig ott eee oa ies tiba: b genta apo og EE REEE - ee : es * EES PS ale a : ES PEE i See esc ced S8g eshte GR RRNA pe SL USnE Sh Ebel Bae Ret po SRE ces} ms Pe LEER ees q ee eee PHL On LR ae
Ere eee &SEOe ee eeeee8 eePreyeee me Sseee See ee Ce ete aie :2EST Se ere Reece og Bese ca ee, eee ae ees eee es OR ne ee RS rr ee! 4 Bo Me ee ae ee eee : Bee ey ee oe a ee ee, ee ee ee eee Mraeerer es ¥ PURE Ee as Spee BEE ee ee cee oA LST ee pe eR a Mi Re 7. eee EMMI see aoe eee er Pan ee % a as a De gabe EEN Deca eeeee Ep Hille PARES Me DEUS i bs EES Saree eee eae ees et ee er alld fr Me LE EE eee ie EE gee era a eee Beppe re. perire pT ae
ees ee ee SB Be Se ee ee fe ee a ee Boao ee ae3| eee aeeepe ae boes Ce ee Pee ee a ee We pee ee OU ieee ee=. ee EEE eeeee ee. eS Je ee oe ae rree aaehee” aici Goa ee ee 2ree af= a
eee te. :epibe Boi)a Rin SS)TE SEGRE astate UE onaBl eeeioy. Pee+3. ACU Uh eesML egPegs Suereeeee beaten Rae eee eae hBLEh CEee ReeM Legis 1 Re etre ST 0 cree ER eeeania ee SeORE Petia Bee BS 27ROLE cae Je PEgtitas pres epi aeae
eeeEe Hi Rime HSEBLE Sastr: NEE a ame ee ee DOERR AS ee.eeseene cS a :oe HOST See ae eg pe ccinpra oe coe rene nee : nee m3 foee Se orate eetaee eepee? =SEU ae Skye: Bees So eee ee pee nS Bee rene ee BaSA PE o> i aOe ee3 BAPEae En iui ofee eeeBee 8 # eee Be eee “RF Be tc eee Sa eee gee ae Crane enree FUSER tore
La ee er es BE Eee eeetBees Ee Reeea ee ees FURS oses eeRarer eoee eee ee, ee ee pe ee ee. be eeSeIeeeeage eeCOIS ipe eeSTee eeAyae te
ae App age pen sseaee oe eee fe Fe Go fe ETE EO Bag neee en dea gery 7 ag in SeELIT Page a BAe ane ;Bes ape ee 3 EePEE a ROR aME ee CS aH a Nt.a NN I at HI I HE REN
po oeee?De ee aasee eeee ee ee oe Pe See eee Ms ee P68 eeSue ae pees Ee Raaf ee aes ees Se eeee cia eee ee es pe ey Ue ee er es gees ae ee Ete ee po ee are oe eter ON Ce eS
Ee eee SEE SPa IES Sere Ga eee ee Se ser RUE EIEE Eno Gilat eeeeeBPs GPE a ICR TS.EMS 2 DieaSarge Sigees = Beeere eee eetees ie 8Pig oe nS eeeEES Serta stag ae feo MEMES i eA ROMA ii fies) Sag aadRE RTE eeeSee ESO MOE RE TeOP pee
Eee eeey eeere eSceeeeS eygaleeta ieee ccele weSa ee ee a eeaa oe eoeee a eeeee eres re ee eee ee pe eee ee Pe OR Soak oe BE eos Se jee A er BEEP EET 2 SOs Pe US
Ee ee ee a eeeee eeeoe ee Se ee ee ee Rr ee BAe ee oeeegg eeese ee Tipe: Cag Ee GORE EE Sees. 35 29 So ee eras Sue Rae EP Ne StS Bais EER 558" ERR MER ear ee SIE eee ae Beh Oe i Ieee SiR og eet ata ee Sa bre ee oe
PUG MER ET Ee eres Pes 5 EMSS ieee Sia sO Sees pee oe ye eee sa ood Re See, HEE pee es ere see eee ee ee Gane
as se ee toe ee”Bee Reee ges HereeEs See a eee es bE ee ee a oe ee ee oe a; ete nn SS seke a & oes pion jai! ee ee ae SEP S ee ZB:Bt,Pt SOS ae era: cae: Ce Saas eee eo ae tga oe aFe ERSTE. Be gl cahoots es ee ae OTS Ey Baas wai cc Ras : BG RSS es RES a = Ree Bete ES, Be RES BEE BGs SE vt af PER Eeeer ooEa ee 4Beoeies Me eo Se ao asate ees ee :_‘a.:AB PAPE ee eee eeaa ees ee Be sii ea 288deka lack?)BBS SRE Ee AP a; Ree oe $ gee po PRE” NG 8Pe = (Puen SRT aes eas SPER ices ae aierBEE, A :CEOs ge ee Spi ie 1 Sige: Re ee eee oP eee eee . as: ae RO PB Ee BE AGa.CER Ee gis ee fe be ee OS es Mens est +}Gk BE AsEE fps the i? ER fees « Es > fe: pe ee 5 i Tiek am . ie . eritbie agSAGER oe a ee Oe ee eeeeee ee ae veEook eea : Be See Ce ee eee ee So eS eee Ce es es aSORES A Met ge he Be WS ee EEeR eeEER ae pores PRR Se Eeoy gs gen aaa aatts: ye ae RES ea eee reereeaea ek ONCE Uae I? RARE ESSe1 ae EES ae in ee9ee es IC ee Ae Rut A aN ee Ne eso EE ae ee Se Dee Re AE AUS re oa aad . BE SPE RES. Se oa I Ae BES Pid : BS“ Es ae Ee ee eee Se ERE: CURR MRS ar ne Ene ee Pie : ES RE wee mets Retads PTA Qe ng © Ne
a hp SS ve Spry? Cet ike ee Soo perce 7 Been Syne GaSe RO a ee eee eee
Boe oe tes SRD se she aa ice aS aes Se eR Ae be Saree be ee en ee ae pee
SMe UGA rege ig Ee ga ERPS AEs 0A ee wee ee ee ee i eee _ suse ebts LER, ae
Be . GpeeE ee et ARR ee 4 beee eee “Se - .. oa POE LEE -:eee gePei. FSS go [~ Pe eg RRRESES UE. eee Hy BR ae oe ‘gg agSPER es as Bee a TeSig (PARES Se, rere Se Src: See BiePe gSsoso TNBe PRR eres.. CE ye eetER ohYE : Ree SU 2S = Sane Tees eR Sue, TeSeOF. ER Bae! "oopi.. *Seeet GREE lalS oe Se. EE Sepa nualeee tag PY gee SCREEN, "FM hs ¥. PBs fee thy Pxekenn Se . Pe. Beige 5 to 2. RN i ot ateS Es * sinBPRS 1 Beane PES SSE Ts ae ag oi eSore i So eer RN - Pa DPRR LER: +ieee a cesREe so Sie EES eaER CS0.”eee aeSe LEe 4vs: if Ragen est erePRR Ok Aas pet Rie See acai” ts See ane SEES EY TES es Ug 2 rae Bec :2a tee :i ee an en. aps : ca oe ge Se Set . Ton a ne BeaeRs ES co ck bsBe Magee $ Penmaes eS i SR fame Mae BA . ieSu*an2lones. de a Ss Ime seeCoes. See
ioe eS ae 4 ye PS ee PA
°e co aeSaogee :ame | ree fant hk Bee 3er4G2get i éSs re e Cat :eee. SOa:Se :oo “Eee? ae eeneoe aeSe Beers TY,ee e EW 4,BE ee we SEE See ae 43) 4. eee Se3eo aSet oe eg Beigh Mr aR a SNS fos RE: . tOMEC ES > 4 a 5 D why fae 2 ae | ee ie
nN lan in I erent ps See . : eT, WP gaa! ; ae ae SU Ege £ eas (mee ff
Rak iS lab ee 4 efile , og Poovg A on SoD ae ae ge a we 5 SaaS .
rc fe j —| ] 1e ic] Bers "Se _ Rea eieo eaag tneee fasege : Sr ha gee eeBe ae ©. =_—a o=:feagpee aaa ee ‘ peeBe EE aR bee sean geass cock egart toe, ee FL Wat ge Co See eas: aER eee Ses AfPeaED ae Be aa NSDy erSgSG eeeOF a . 4bee a se 32 Sage See: geBPES ieee RR Sere ee. GE . (fo) pce eae ae ee & Pree eee See:
2 en Bae ot ; re 7: a ek © pi ee ee
+ 5 Peewee 24 : Sig te ‘eo t a Pees. yaghecs a 3) Beet Bape
Pe yakscirculated Soe piesa) gas os ere .oe Put 2tees 1eS ee images. ewere ex a"ieee |oe y peo SESS a Fe Bhae. Be:ig7a =. 2|ES :ee Ecov, ee Bedale’ VE SU ee sa:i 3
bands, circular windows, cantilevered balconies) in these buildings.** One paradigmatic example that occupies special status as a republican icon of modernity is the Ismet Pasa Girls’ Institute in Ankara, designed by Ernst Egli and inaugurated in 1930 with much publicity and media coverage. It is a four-story building with a balanced composition consisting of a horizontally accentuated facade flanked on the two ends by vertical stair shafts, along with a flat roof, rounded balconies, and continuous window sills—a characteristic expression of the modernist aesthetic as it was adapted in
Architecture of Revolution » 87 = ———— Turkey (see fig. 2.8). Photographs of the front and rear elevations of the building were published in Celal Esat Arseven’s Yeni Mimari in 1931, an important document that
celebrated the switch from Ottoman revivalism to European modernism. Feature essays were devoted to the Ismet Pasa Girls’ Institute in popular magazines, celebrating both its architectural modernism and its new program to educate women well adapted to Western lifestyles, manners, and cuisine. La Turquie Kemaliste published photographs of young girls standing in front of the building in their school uniforms (fig. 2.19), and Yedigiin published interviews with the teachers and students of the institute.’ The two most powerful symbols of the Kemalist inkilap, architecture and women, were thus combined in the aesthetic and programmatic specificity of one
building. While an undecorated and geometric modern aesthetic constituted the formal discourse of the Kemalist revolution, there was also a strong typological component to it
that to this day identifies particular building types or programs as quintessentially republican. Buildings and projects representative of the state and the ideological agen-
da of the RPP constituted an “architecture of revolution” (inkilap mimarisi) in the more literal sense of the term. Of these, government buildings, often inscribed with Atattirk’s words and facing a formal government square (huiktimet meydant) with an Atattirk statue in the middle (bust, equestrian, standing figure), represented the presence of the state in every city and town. So did post offices and railway stations, which symbolized the extension of Ankara into every corner of the nation. The buildings most representative of the RPP’s ideological agenda, however, were those for the education and indoctrination of the people along Kemalist ideals—the spaces in which
the regime sought to make a nation out of a heterogeneous and traditional population. What follows is an overview of how architecture was instrumentalized for this ideological mission.
Educating the Nation THE INSTITUTIONAL AND architectural infrastructure for “educating the nation” had a clear priority on the republic’s ideological agenda. A nationwide literacy campaign in the new Latin alphabet, the closing of religious schools, and the establishment of universal national education (tevhid-i tedrisat kanunu) were among the first acts of the republican regime. Contemporaneous photographs and paintings
testify to the cultural significance of the theme of education: they portray healthy schoolchildren in their uniforms, women being taught how to read and write, and
coeducational village schools where boys and girls were introduced to scientific learning and republican ideals (fig. 2.20). Schools as well as centers for popular education (Halkevleri, or “People’s Houses”) and projects for new villages and agricultural resettlement programs (k6y mimarisi) were the centerpieces of republican building activi-
ty, planned and supervised directly by the RPP. Whereas banks, offices, and
;°
88 - Architecture of Revolution
ms : posencencmcasse ie : Pe j og ee
* | ie NPE one 5 ee aeeeee‘ ar tyec tePS % heen ateee Sang ate Wind oe nse ete egi 5ma ee,ett Ronee : %:5“she fm rie oF odie 8: sugeT Soca AER eet bec eats SiiySito. 3tt; eepee ssook ae *:Ht ioe my, Se iby LP RAR EE Wak TAR REpays pS gioeA Cis kaha aa ten ROR Eos Sk cong ee aeS MA rtee adeae oeee Fi: 6 PRE ores See HE AR pone a. oe Re ee FS an : ; s "4 Sanaa pa Si eae wi oe ae ea eer ne TA, fect e a eae 2 Sao 2 % ¥ Ree i, 3 lak se ge Ro : AS (tations ey CRSA U a re aren ies is é Pe PE : ee ; ; aes ee : eked fans MN 6 ¥ 4 ae we Mi Ege 3 Se
ane soy Ne De east nies pe oo e, hy bie retires i ny ae ee oie oe. oe “.* eae 8 oo
‘ faeiba Sree BeBe De,ntti COMER RTS CR 18 ois, tor aoteen ee een aPAO ANS nds Kon gee etlos pe, pean heetee : rene aeteSR ee ieee *%of ‘ae x Fo meas of ine OBC IRDen cei dias mene Raaaayers aieeee tg Se 8 ieNS arane Piece Seepmre ice =Bese ‘¥mS . ee, d erie ay epee Venn nie at8)tent ie a icon BGReon: fee ig teois Bere ieee ren ee %ese se en agi
‘ FAA 54ee EEE TE ge By>Se}aah wa a cae t, NER hg Ae ee ncn ae se Ses: z ésrf eg Rpieeine sexoBe cee at‘ ‘:eo4deer cee ore > ; ASR itNene od thEee MG SaSR eeReighet:Mites eer oA. a ;femme 8 ei» k{atgetie athe AMER rgOSE tint te : : els BeaeMAS Ga ; {> : ee MERC Pee eo eee eeote Ss.Sa ee peRe ee ee ‘ ary , .eo: :a
ioreousee ean ES Rey : ANY Ba 3) A i Gh Seep eta CE ae es eats, ne 74 Dig i ORR peclaLm : :eee eaCORES eaeByeg ee ee eeee ee peees © sF ‘; shah ears.Saeea att arth Sarah io) ra aes *4iY Pas Sy ae 1ety og +3 $ tReet Se eee ats wie: “sega zEee 5Na SENG es orey Bs ise Ce oc Spa ; : ‘ eaten AS Bie aye BY} Fetes Nie eit cet a eee ag * aegnaanneat CU ne iW} Ware AeesotVing Seems ee Ee fats ae.BNE ‘hata) 4ae tSes A ee vied PiBy bf Ravi % ;teed bee BEAT Se Gash ph fie rete eee | ee coe fee RC5AN se aa i¥ SED caseee anne, Pie AFG tsa mie YF: ose tgspeice Semen ; beeen SiTS, eee:LER Regina pas, paves fi249 at }f ?ey - %: AeDy Pees he SiRF fe 5 ay eae Sares“Ed ohm tee te Cee Ia5Ee aN
TeSIEeee ns ce*eeSieal:‘YE) ARDS pene Baie ee ne ae see iy ig BsBie ouidlaie ete ae éAP ; i fhe ORES a eae tae eS eee eree a ae g eet ET tom RAD CRS RM Breese JRC eeSORA See aerate Pema reeas eteccate ie CeSsesNee iyotsShas eats LTE 2Ft 3= :e.. Fs Ocak Bogiee Poa pete aes «Rane GaSe : : 3 LY ZAMS. ELS RS pele eee ees ce NG ee et em ia fe oes eh da a te LARS od Seren any ste Fania. Sp Tse % IRS he $43 + PP iS aad pacers th El roe eet ys Be, Loh eae ee ae gs eo ier tgs oe
Peer ye etea. AE! ai SWBe WeWee Rage a: UREN aeaia) ee tee9atgee ae eR ee. eae eee G8) peti NTT arINeate anthers BAY ( aiin . nae Re gue SS Cee Vases | cesar ees eePetes Be ea! at ihe: a Ss BYR Areenate bey GAPE es.tN ioeca ¥9ieheceSe ip Wma arene: Tce Aaa ae tEA Bi SAS GoHees eae hit speaaoe | at pak Pe ONC aa On are Tee tee ae WI Semmes eES IR MG Nees ° ee ce i Bee er er ee 2 ooo we a et OSS AEs they pee eA, BL AN LE LA OW on oe SORREEG TINDER Mal ches Meese tat Gane & :rey +f HAS th ieeeIedAg eae is ee ipeeees Eiji eit sae Vince SM TEN Garces ear AT lo, eh Pols aonre ane alymenieatcng 4 Dotto i t!thers ais eeornate, 4 BSeee ageee eae 3Riny Seem Meee at oR Pane re uke * ‘ Be ABN08 Stare ot oy tee aay a7 - Spi ba press Hier ese Nt OE Es Boren re oe ee
LPs EN OA GNA is teal, SPOUT ON nent py Ceol f LEAL aL eae Tse owls CR pe ae Ce Sat) ES : es Ale ee Bee Be eee oc 2 leads bio
PA EEA pr ROROe LPL Caray OrTU gaheNO ohne bby Yn tey ih cies, Fasten) Pakerae tte BSL re 87 ytd taeDSN BS aeAALS PR NSSES PN Bee wieitintnnnneti ss 8 tree Street EE ba corey a Les UMS ALAYS hie RICR etReed ee Es AORTA NCA EE, PAS ‘' : 6erat RPS Bee NE BLT, reeeee Bag feeticBe
BAA ENN Bet eae Ra oa Aag atTR Ere eee d iesahbaenegy RY acoe EE tees ihe i etree A ye DRLOE PLWORE Mer eh pate2), yee, SieccN 8%*pS REE Se:ph SNe 9 PME et OL AL, OERlin AEE BUSTED cre nyeoes NAAN tase Rea MRIWy UHieePivis SBR SIPSiolasl SLO£ES AY tite ales ok Me L'aaan eaeeked RRR R RR GREE PaesNE s Scheme bower te ee ARLIS ai ASara od EE Dr Iheeho! WaCFEI St SEDI rrr Stretntincesian Bc Pitte eum ee ta g5 Es AES ite See LOSES ELEN WP ORU FARR MMi I ina eV are oe tt ANT NEE REAR METS SORE. & : ee | No oka eS es ay OE taper e e aE ASOL IEE TOR Ie Gish CNTR ES A GREASE Ie BEE eesti ar, siitoawress Cie i nae: i) hatred bin Pee ne roe AGonty is oe Hiner BG BY nes hers oat On Ea : gee ee ee ee ee ee Serge Wirere Se vo
Ree snArtirOrne’, (einai ian aAAs be perris (Mane e Tie i vit Mevec fy) SET}. NES pat Iheh eeSaeee Ceee “ie ie ores A RU ERY TESoran Sint EEL COOL ALaSorte saeip ienano bas tiie 4ENA f Peg / ste \omens eee 4 sEt| ee Pe >, eeAga Ee trVARS eetess his Saye Ceci RR REE TES oe ee a Oana Pernt gibie Soinci, PeS EE a ea AgAa 1:aPena My Ua yae YUN heSaeeops eroR Nig re engm ee arEe ee (OR oe: ee hail ees Banned ve RNS EO tao Hi erie pS LT een eh eSipae oe ihe Brel f BEG een; ;of Sime ee eee NEN EeBe, oa mee tess,Se By Wane died an GME Liner GMO tS Gita ema trg Ata > AP bierSEBO Vaaa pA eet | fo Beek ee CeBee ae ecEe eeNie CN AR ME Lele ae eee Se rtghea tee ate rau ascaDoers eonyo nate inca Gepy See De ps BEAL ONG DORAL SSUEE PRI gic LOR LenS faa TApo hee ae tee’, 1! {Aap eeeaas Yfke 3G ARN ae ie SE |rgAang IW cee Rete Be reee) ea aneAS a Ps a BP EG a aee ae eRe ea tas eR eee aa pera ea Te Lang rea Moen a Rabie War atrirnrsee Naeakties emia anresine 3INN meA |FSud ot ak .eal oe ea ae +f “yd SS Pat ? \ oa Wf go : ° 1930 . : S. rs ie) oe he Institute in M KK . We i 2 nstitute in Manisa, ae AA ee a fe aS = Pe ae Se eS 4ie“. ” Bey mm, ie? pga oa me ——— wm oo LS| aCae ss eee *aaia, 7y sepe aa ead vee a Ml eatsme oS 2 ce 1ee 9 Yo Ut° Nn S | a]et .el. r. . ~ | fre ee be ee ° ‘P.tae .ys Meee ees ee Ce 3) Be MR es 4FiLe ote ©:“a3 pag \ Vee a ies ak oe Ss kee 54poe ¥ -oe .aed Eg Bs eyt:Pi Rete aae ae LB eae BO, if .ntf tO f |he}|S }e i < oes Ae ‘>i.e oe See be foleS I3Y :res ay iss “ee ‘Be: ued Nn Or Sa |PNn ro } Se13 aBe, fica oSFg. ig ae ee Sua cleeDsha iioR ~ateog 2ea " en | : aaG CEPE 4400
yp 7
‘ wel hoy oe ee GE
- ~~ - 5 f "A Aga _ A
: i * i i 5 on * a, “ wid “s ad rr} _ VALIVET PAN 49008) Boa SS. -
ae . 4 . ne ae ~
Fig. 2.21. A representative example of modernist school design in the 1930s: project for a middle school in Tire by Abidin Mortas, as published in Arkitekt, 1937. Different functions are grouped in different blocks in an L-shaped layout defining an outdoor assembly area. Flat roofs and undecorated cubic volumes reflect a distinctly modernist aesthetic. Different window sizes and forms of windows reflect what is behind them: large windows for the classrooms, narrow horizontal bands for corridors, circular windows and/or vertical slits for stair shafts and double-height spaces such as the gym.
schools for Anatolia (1938-1939) designed by Margarete Schiitte-Lihotzky for the Ministry of Education were of the two-phase kind, in which at its largest the school contained two or three classrooms with separate living quarters and a small kitchen for two teachers. The materials were specified as wood, mud brick—clay, brick, or rough stone. Schiitte-Lihotzky’s perspective drawing of this three-classroom type of village school for 150-180 students depicts an idyllic Anatolian landscape with the school building located atop a hill overlooking the village, in aesthetic harmony with the whitewashed walls and red tile roofs of the village houses below (fig. 2.23).
ee =°* e
)-
92 . Architecture of Revolution
.:~| . . -
a os -
TASTAN UG SINIFLI , of G88 KOY MEKTEBI.M.1.100 PLAN
YOZ SEKSEN TALEBELIK 8 bes
.pireezu=~:aL. — 3 .Soya - ATT TER EY ters — ~ as . at —-—_Ft_
is. ;t! ':
Feaareeetrerertes” saa cm eee . se Sop ert = ty ~ ‘© ow 7pba. es CeBeeied
aBue r}—De ——-4Pn ~ --f}---et6. corde aur sr qete new
eee .. .. :pn |, err ee ee ee ee ee ee re
eeFeee Rcee aee yo pe Oe oe ee ps veOD ee dseae eg a hs err GNae eo tee tate Bee ee es ce eees ee ee ee a cee a es eeeee re ee ee Pete iis ageeTeee Se ha aae aeeee We eh lee eyee eea ee er ee eeia ey8 eeOT ee eepe eeeee MeO Pres eae ee ee eeee ee eeee eee TAGLOES Si eee yn SS Oo Pt ph A ee eee ok #2 Sig aE pee eR er Sere. as a oe PST SENSE Mes ERE CONS Ure BOE SB Rg ge A gy Pg RL URES Joa SPA Bigs a ESSER OSE Ge Bull SESS OI a
7 es Ge aye ee ; Gre NN ee eee ee Me
ee eeeeeeeeEye ee ee ogEe eee ee ee re decece Ce es. oa eeMeeee PERSE EE Mos gk BO EE OEE? aes EeeRe (Pee ee ie eM ee rc el Se Se Seeg ee eeeTP oes Rion sek neee ee Reg Be cdrom feeie Beie sigeAa eevee ae Phe eesOe eee RES SES ROSEee OE ne ee ieee eee OME ERS ie eege SisaaSool ee ee ane ee eeeee cer ee Be eee ist Sie age eeGyae eo eee oe a ES eee eS ee aSeen ee oe Oe eeER Fe reee Re ee eeSESS ees Baya EeSES Geer a noe. Seduce: obee Pes Seeseae oSeR Deeeae Se SI Beaegaac RO acSRE IA sR aS PE GeO eeAeae eeese RRR oot es SPS PES ee nn ee Rigi ae 2 Be eReEEE Ea i ahe ba eR eee es er gaa arta ESR ne Re CaeI ene Beseee eB eee Be Ng OpeRD EYeR eS RE Seaigecet
age oSBisse MIE eS eee esgic ee oe aan peerosCRBe ee ee aa Sa Tere SS a PO a TP Iee Se Res Se Ae esereee aae cee. ee ore ee ee ee ee Ne a ee ee inte ee eg i eea Se sR Se eee ieee eee ee AR ere age a ee
ee Se ee SSeie USSSee SN AEN EaeSBebe Page ee eeA aaaa2receBe gCsoccce OS ah seen aGe eeetc as ae9ake temee Gene ace geBivig ge ae ae cea Reet eegee ee aed yay eSeb eS AeES ae PR eectESS Re eae crea egesaae Cee AeOk eeerane Meee Se eeeeee ee ae Serr Peg ae SEE LST eB RSSBoge ine eS aa PRESS SteeeyVee a oe ee eesee Rega ir yt gerae BReee a ee
So Ee.: TSS Spay et aeeeFee Sioie Gey EE Se Re Nee SaneSe1S OEE coe il gs eee pepo ae Shee .RP EL naSRPNet ena Rt| ARR Genre ot aSR Cees eeemgage ee Oe ao SS Co Saeemeee EBs ? a 7h aR Sd WTP Bag PR OES as Be SS OP a ge RSS ee ge ‘ eae ee ae ©ee ESE DOCS Sag ot!ee OE SSR CS aesaegiS, O8 A PN Ni ae ea Be es‘ ee 2 or LS ge ~, ee Geeens. © =3Be Seses BeSah AREOR BSBey iar pk a i,aeee oyOO SRR goa BPi eae SE aeSs 4ae eG RS eee aeaeee a =een : Seee & “te Rese oe igre aus EMR ae Sep ee ageeee cS ee SDs SSSeaTe aaa, ee = Bee ae ee ee eeSR eee ee a aeee SSeeSS PE ches, He Ce a tapepeeg 2 aeeeECT MG fe iceCee ee erOe ee Bae Gees- ee ee,nee en ae Fu, eae i Be eee ee 2 Geese eee ee wot ee RE PRE eesoe¥ee 5 gs A NES yyaog paret . Ghee ore Sree es: oe 7 | eee Bes aie PSS Sa. so SESS Ft eae Bs | 5 CS eR ee SNE ee. f Sees a = 5, Avant eck Gite CE OE OOS a
poe BES ge a tSee eheiga ee eS aa cee by, eeeRe eeBy pee ee fo. Be-.elBeOO ee eeseaBeet ee
. ee oe ee eS ee Re ee eraes ifageee es eeooOe ee weepe Se ,Se ee Beet isey ee eee eeeee ES Fee ee. PT gee eg oe HN (RESee ES ie ee ee ae Ea 2 Eee aia aa ee eee : ESR 0 SE ae eee eee avgee: i Be eee Si ve hes. Se fie © fe ee pee oeae 2S oe oe Se foo Ze Beeee veeaodos ee ip ee oe Be hts Sage SEs os ee - ee ens eeaLo? re eee : ee eee ee 2eeJ. ae E:8Ee FOP ee i Sako PoE ie: ses BePs oteee Pe eee 2S otree aBo eeee ee ee uo i RE gs A RS 2 ae, ee ee Po oe ee 2. po Pa Pipes BRS Bees eC be Ss 3 ee ee Se OS ee a oe i eee °e pr Scns eee eeaS : ee|Te RRDee Be ee oe eeeS eeee eeee oe ee Ce Bees eee ee ee re ee of a ee a ee Pe a 3 el Bo Be ee ee ee SS ee ge Pe ae ee . : Pee re eR le a a a ane ee ee eee or et Re ee midi S72 Pe i 3 BESS Po ee ae te Seen Aerts eee pa See eae et Fee ko OP eRe ee AE GE a BE A a See Rg ed eee eg Ls:
aa Be eg ee ee ee eds ee a OS eee : S aispeagg Pe eeesTd a POL} Oe eeASae eh oe aeeer ee ee See Mie ee ee ceand er cece Seee ge Bas ga an ee Pap ee get eea Eo ee gree Pere I.gee I oe ee ceee cee eaeees rae - :. See aig en ee | Sra ee ge Fo Se es Pe aee ee Bee a a& eeeee i Syee S one -SeeLe “ee: Se aa eee ee ee Oe Se a ee ot ee i eee ee eee A EES ok Duane eee ee Oe a eg os . ee ee ee : ee eee ee ee ae A nn 2 eae A re ee ee ee ee ee oe a Se Z of CR eas Ee RA SE Se ee eae
- Sees wat Brie sg es ane ree nN eee EL pS 5, OTE Se ea eu ere te Pe nn amen re eC eremr: oca UPS “6 Sloe. MAS eattragt ts 2 ar ay png RR eR RR
- + SERS | Sea gee emma em E aes Be oe Got ee een oe ture Sg ee ee ee Ug a gee Mig cP ae eT x, EE
eo ee ee ee Se ee lO
wrk oo. -5E gees See te eRe«5ee. cee! LAS LE TF ye ae eePoo tee 2ARES Be : . 3 SEBS St. ES ae stone eeeeee eg, ee _ 3 “SO PU teSe Ce Piece RO eekteENO Peeeae eReSf.era eee neers ARERR RSERE EOOR . es tae peeSg oe SRG pS OR eRea Ra ae
pe. ‘ PS Se ee es RB oe Eee gee ee ea BOP ee ee eee,
ie med = > ee360 ‘ Reger SF PRES Dt ign We UB¢visage PE LBS Toeseen aS Reee TRO ee aaSee iy S Sena eet. Bae Pet ogeeaE keel eeoe SESE CSS SSR esee ai RO cle Me ee ———— example of this modernist aesthetic, with the assembly hall-gym block culminating in a rounded end and lit through a row of circular windows (fig. 2.25). L-shaped plans with rounded corners for the entrance were also common, as in the case of Yalova RPP
Headquarters—People’s House by Sedad Cetintas (1934) and the unbuilt winning
design for the Sivas People’s House by Nazif Asal and Emin Necip Uzman (1938) (fig. 2.25).
In terms of plan arrangement, the larger spaces of the hall-auditorium and gym were typically located in a separate block easily readable in exterior form while the rest of the program—offices, spaces for activity groups, library, and classrooms—constituted the main block. The blocks were arranged so as to define an open space or courtyard for meetings, concerts, public festivals, and weddings. The program also included offices for RPP officials, sometimes designed as a separate building connected to the People’s House by a colonnade, as in Manisa People’s House by Asim Komiirctioglu (1938). In other cases, party offices were located on the upper floor(s), as in the Karamtrsel and Gerede People’s Houses by Leman Tomsu and Munevver Belen (1936).7* In unusual cases such as the Eskisehir People’s House by Izzet Baysal (1936, demolished), the entire program was designed on the upper floor of a long, two-story block, and ground level was reserved for shops to bring revenue to the RPP. Construction of People’s Houses was typically of reinforced concrete for floor slabs and the structural walls and columns, with brick infill. After 1940, however, the use of stone and pitched tile roofs gradually replaced the earlier materials that had produced such pristine geometric forms, launching a new trend in national expression.
Colonizing the Countryside PARALLEL TO THE elaborate organization of popular education
through People’s Houses, the RPP’s program for “colonizing the countryside” through village architecture (ROy mimarisi) represented another major spatial component of republican ideology. Turkey was an overwhelmingly agrarian country, with more than 80 percent of its population living in rural areas in the 1930s. The contribution of villages to the national economy was a strong incentive for modernizing them. The training of peasants (ROycriltik) constituted one of the most important branches of activity in the RPP program. Not only the modernization of existing villages and agricultural lands but also the resettlement of refugees from the Balkans and other lost territories of the empire were major challenges encountered by the republican regime in its first decade. By 1933, sixty-nine model villages had been built by the state,”5 and the “modern and scientific standards” employed in their construction were contrasted with the
“poor and primitive condition of peasants in the old empire,” in the characteristic
manner of “old versus new” (see fig. 2.4). It was after the consolidation of the RPP’s power (1931), however, and under the auspices of the People’s Houses (1932) that villages and peasants became primary
_.7e:e
98 . Architecture of Revolution
a ee |eee acest | .:za eo28. RISE Re ee cneescanet on ..
.-.| oe aE ae ee cei 3 . : an Ce ee - . cen ele ee
: : eea,u- i- iti | zi i ee. “come Bese ti oe eS i ee a ee eee | . . . Lo i | ip Soy A ig i i Bocas Pe ee ee
: —SO e ; /“Fills. Bees ee iwae ee 2 0 See 7 . . Z (oe Se Es —_— } i i big § = Si Ee = y Ea ea E Ei Bee g Bo 5. no | SE aaa
: : - cement tad === te eee ene . - -
a =... st DETREI ,:: i. |émeas “oe— isa :aL :: goes .: : ibo.ytfBe: .et ambinaRi a. . Fey TRBe,.iaciescresites Seer eegeers eed SC oe ae Eg ORR eS ARISE OE SE oe Sinem ea Stent | ee Ay 7 ; AR cl' beerne mere +.aefo fr meres See aeLge i iy POLS: aeeee i keag nea wie ee ere : - -
- : : (OLDE RSE OS .
: ; . “os : es 5. H Bs , ae ei a ee ee ee ee asp en : :
aes aCEee ee : a EE ee tit.
. . a . a sata, gia oY de ve me ae Ra ile FFs edt aha caga pubis = * E wees es Doerr eh Te pe eae ae ESE a She EES Se i ae eR ert eet ter eee
: - . we Ee wae Ee foe TS Se SS eer MNS oe ee ee ee ae SOR a gay a ae ie EE ee
Po SP oe te lll i Sop Ne ee ee ee pe oe we ee PTL oad 8 os ae ae ne OS EG a Rae ee Se Oe Oe a ee
ee eT py eS LS a Ea oe vee ee 18 fe ee
- z . hor caaied a - - weal SEL RE RS i MRI a Ea oa - op! lt Ba TRESS TE AEs ere aR CN pone Sawant gute eyes cokin merareryeee SESS oT -
PON aad ee | , | an nn ; : aes iM eK rc rm, . - ere FS fae -- : 2 re LE MME EISrRIN ) / | | | if & key izes 12 koy EVER’ |
. . 00 . _ _e e o . l 7 K AGtve 13 SAMANLIK, | | mo oy 9 SIRARVLER 14 KoRU .
. . . ‘14° ate. . : : " '
presented as a distinct area of specialization for archi- Fig, 2.27. Model village tects, legitimating their claims to serve the regime as project based on a uni“agents of civilization.” “Villages are of paramount sig- form grid by the “urbannificance in nation building,” wrote Abidin Mortas in ist architect” Burhan Arif 1935, “and they must be designed and supervised by the (1935).
professional architect, responding to the local tradi- oo tions, building techniques, and materials of the vil- oe
lage.””8 This plea was illustrated by a plan for a model village by the “urbanist
architect” Burhan Arif. A linear shopping street terminating in a small square at each end occupied the village center in a symmetrical arrangement (fig. 2.27). One of the squares was given to state functions and held government buildings; the other was the cultural square containing the school, the museum, the village hall, and the fountain. As the ultimate expression of scientific rationality and efficiency, identical village houses in detached and row-house variants were laid out in a rectangular grid suggestive of a thoroughly flat site. The diagrammatic simplicity and exaggerated rationality of the proposal, like the rubber-stamp designs of most model villages built by the — state, disregarded most traditional rural settlement types in which village houses of
different sizes and qualities typically huddled together in clusters. ,
_ Most conspicuously, the absence of the mosque, the primary landmark of most
Turkish villages, was a strong architectural statement affirming the secularizing agen-
da of the RPP. Architects shared this secular enlightenment ideal, and Aptullah Ziya ,
expressed their suspicion of mosques as follows: |
Architecture of Revolution - 101) ———— Edifying and electrifying the villages never occurred to the rulers of the Ottoman Empire, with the exception of some mosques they built in Anatolian villages. These mosques had no other effect than strengthening the religious loyalty of the peasants to the sultan and thus turning the oppression of the individual to a collective oppression. The worst thing about a village mosque, which has been the only cultural and social center for the village, is that in its four walls it offers a bastion for the reactionaries who are the organizers of oppression and ignorance.”
An even more remarkable example of the idealized diagrammatic approach to planning new villages is a 1933 project attributed to Kazim Dirlik, inspector general of Thrace (fig. 2.28).8° This “ideal republican village” (ideal cumhuriyet kdyti) was laid out in perfect concentric zones for residential units, for health, educational, and sports facilities, and for commerce and light industry, all radiating from the center of the circular plan. According to Gilstim Baydar Nalbantoglu, it was “unmistakably inspired by Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City diagrams.”*! Nalbantoglu argues that “republican
model villages consisted of neatly arranged rows of identical houses reminiscent of the disciplinary environments of nineteenth-century factory towns.” Her evocation of a “disciplinary environment” is appropriate for this plan in light of the fact that the perfectly geometric centralized plan was indeed a symbol of reformist utopia, from Renaissance ideal cities to Jeremy Bentham’s “Panopticon” in the nineteenth century. It was the most symptomatic formal expression of Enlightenment ideals that informed the RPP’s village architecture program. In 1936, Zeki Sayar further elaborated on the civilizing role of the architect and the necessity of imposing the plans and ideas of experts even when they conflicted with traditional settlement patterns and lifestyles: Although we must consider the habits and lifestyles of the peasants when we are constructing the new villages, we should not hesitate to go against these traditions wherever they clash with contemporary social and hygienic standards. The new village plans should also provide the users with the means for civilized living. A revolution in lifestyles is also necessary to teach them to sleep on individual beds rather than together on the earth, to teach them to use chairs and tables rather than sitting and eating on the floor. Kitchens, stoves, and bathrooms should be standardized into a number of different types so as to obtain the most economic and functional results.”
These writings by Zeki Sayar, titled, without any hint of irony, “Interior
Colonization” (/¢ Kolonizasyon), illustrate architects’ more “professional” approach to the building of new villages and resettlement of the land. He criticized the earlier model villages built during the first decade of the republic, the inadequacies of which, he argued, were evident by looking at all the additions and alterations the peasants had made to render them habitable. In order to improve on these early examples, he
emphasized the necessity of resorting to the technical expertise of architects. He
declared it a “civilizational imperative” to eliminate the use of mud bricks (kerpic), “a
primitive material utterly unfit for construction by the state,” and advocated the extensive use of concrete and cement (cimento) in “village buildings, sanitary infra-
SS ie, FY UO a oe
————— 102... Architecture of Revolution
ee re re eee Pm, F
— lc er! Oe eeSF:C—~—“‘“‘“i‘ ° z oe pepeoO | on LS GS In hae ee ee ye ei 8s Eee soe TST GRLICE age oePi ag ic as eee = Stet Sealey BST gem be ete te REE Nees eee aoe ee Ce eS Sus. ete ee al Bag dan a20g birisi: es basmakaliptan. pe, Eeee enx yf Aaea CE aa ees ee 2% AOpk, coceea Bees a gat reed oc ehegSeen SE SER aebs. fa .@Pies sa Oelara be eedCDE etbikmaaes —e eee aLOB oN? Sere ys wantPR thhevatlara nage EAE EZ:Aen, Cob neOe ee Fo SNAeS a cra Menaw te a PARE NS ReFo 2 oAeae Eenena re Sea ald =:§1 agajma. ven} tiva ceva ee bee ee ee eS Oo a ON 8 ier ied Maa rae : 4 - ‘ veal IRL A UMN Gio SPB Meet FR OS ae ees. of i a 1SP¥Aeae 4 “ hE TEAS - “ye Pe yatesee | A Shs ned oyoe 2 pee I I bo ccss... SPIES Oe Ys pe at SARS ta 7Ie poe ::APTA eoPAM npBo ay geen B84 Oe arrears ASo ee §Eee eeeae CE%cy BAS BEN Ses BS *ieee:eees -: PUGE yerecek yeni. vasitalar yaratmasiPRARE eee Bol ee efGIES: oe iiaaes SY GU GLAST 2 heLT AES 3 ES JOSS fgoot es ra ;' ee fF ES ae a ¥YR einsVolk pete te ERE eee ence cee ee! bere. ‘wl RAa Pe CLTeRe at A roe ee§§SYA . 4 aePIAS a ag “aia eS Ee Ae cape P36 %ke :*, . 4 ooSagdaki eas Rheem ty paepciniepael eed ak beer :Bae y| Ae PAN Agee aonwr 7 aaet < Bho Oe resimde: Almanyanin =" ryrehens ‘eri ae ta‘Spee A :dir. AiG WARAEAD aeee RGSS eeBeeAet TR . ww : aaeENT y: eeA. -gris Laker tai. Le nee Pe Te epee Mee OM: ”wee i”efWe fy promt nee ®ys . BED ned DESO Selb Rise coteen A 0 Sees Sore EE Ie IN sey Cv Be fofeng it Be gx pok*SY;¢ . : > Bae CSE leleagd ae Se UAT Cal US Se Sden2 BO ais ay oe C] * inteesS AB waeeesRR Cree thy OR an rats, ageet CE f : «3 ¢ :
bir sehrinde eee 0 \\~er$e OGpaeias Lay OY . ‘ WOE pet Seinsa gaa,edilmis Sec a atoparlak Rane Na|— ia eco SeSARE aeEp i ygs ge Per aaon evier goriiyoruz. Asafidaki resim: | RARDIN A a Ace ew _. gg i eB ee ig Yeah ; PR Sere 3 ; , SR a NES “a: eee an: a mH oe . yao Eee eeBion BltEe) 2 Se ug EeSes Set he\Ye ai€2 be .2aES - *eaewoe =°* : op aPBS tTHeee et fee Sh ee, CU oo eG ¥imseee n ~5;tza8... :ai ;b4 + r5 in5ook e. pl Peed arenee caren anes: ones Rae Ce B25. :}aoak Breeen : :£ge J - "lana ee anSRE - : weets roseOL Pes AE Sale see
aoe :: :a:ar.:-wt naeat Sr ERE 5 Re ae Sh Se “iy UR ie Lo ES hao .: ie aPAS wsteaa a,REA : oes
7Sy. oe 57 aE: ee .Saeed He aeesa: Fe Pte or TUTE z xcok i ee: oa ated eee . aed Se . Lees
Ig. 3.4. Cover of the SpeClal ISSUC O aliroaas cele rating the tentn a niversary O tne repupiIc, 2
ctober , an represen Ing progress In transportation .
_——
1 ‘ in: | | | - Imagining an Industrial Nati
potteree ee eee eats a Se See one reer er ireiae eee ee eat SORES CSE oe es i: SS ee pe ee ee Se aeSee nS ene eee oeEEeeeENGIS pee aSTAR een aeeSTRre ee pe| .-. ee ee ee SgGre Pape aapres is Seger ADU pao ee eey BE ICER DS, OREE rapes meeps? ecn Ss SU ee BessRR eg8eeeae pe eeee
: BS ee ae ee ee ee ee Hecate or ae ra, Rend neg Sie SHEN ee Soe co ri eh sas weet sie bo Stil go eae 3
Ce Sa ee aTei geeeae EEO iyeeEeEn Pe . , 2 eSe Reet ee eee SeUSSee EER Ssos ee ee pS oe oe eS eReBe rs BS a oe PRE Coch ee e, S ves US SESS SE UERu ee EE es EES pe
: Bott Par Sane :ky eke_eeee enee eesea fi aa TEead GE UpRA 8 eA BitsUT DEE Sa Sie IRIE SUSeeMBS LAG Teeean APSE oe : oo BePeeeCEtreeene eyegAT RE(OEE ie 8 ey ieee ee eet eeeeneh eadSpee arene
. re eee ae ee ates pS
ee 2p apie TL.fey Se Woerg ie SEES able SeSTE asaa Bae eeeeTtaPED ES eee sere fe tire Gene pegabneSsees eeRe pte ee eae mele Sa Milepete ln Ilnw fatiiet Sighs oa BRT Lo rein ppd Nasty anAcie icses ee sla eee- may as webeg ENT eaSEED VREalDThlad Tse DSB: Meet bg Bes 2 oR aSdie este Pode Bes py gE
«SA rier rai eet ee Ho ES oe Oe ce orig OPPS dee oH
. | erg elle Pe eo SL DV UR Es ag Tr eee. oor NS eG ee eee ee ween SEER
= bag TE ae Sos PE 0 Sr oe eee © ee te Oe ee . ee Ae a Tg a ee ee ee ee co . . . a age ma | se a ce Len rae Pee a SE. - EE ee iia SPIRE een! ee . - beecars TS Ss see es a pais [a . - an eee ee og BEES She naa eS
i “A Eye payee oo ee lle” ae ae en ees Pe caeha et ee ed noo ee OP io eetSane f oe . : 5 Ss eee aol 2558 Nsee GAAT — =isEOL Yee gibt “Bans . 25050 | BSS) Cogs! Geernaa sh ; Sty ie, ss - Ree EeGa et od ree Se ernfeeee es ioegi ree aa| 6g Bees Spleen ee ee ~ ESTARED ieee 7 ee Bene eeens ae ae Eee bere sommameme e * — ang Pho was aan Sa a a ee Bens emma enue aan A a
wtp Deh SBe lmSpree 7 0 ae ne Sead GElento: SER check Mee paneee LERTEBIES peers donne: So - = ieee eee RIE green Gece ities eee HE Ae Guest OTs erage Ley 3 s wee -. : -= lie-. --ee-pee aed; Fite gs a PER alee ain 2Aere ee gear aVOUS ee ea eee ea oe ES 2ee oe Bee — aa °PSE |, PB Zee:2¥F ee Soe I SSeae a | zeee Sd Fa ae ™oe ee ee ae: oe Biaa ae ae Tie | metRe eesBe ee
ee eee # wy
ome Ge, i Pe RE RE SB a ele? oe |
. Se.aaeeg OS. an 2 gages PeaDe Bee setefe s ae Brees Sees: Bee ah. a2®eeca eeeea a: . oo :Sige! res ge ae neGRE ar LS ag: 2, cage ee ow eeOO iereas, BT Bim ge>OP ee oP wea8 Coaes eer— aeOe SL aenS cee. oo BO ee rad ale Bae ee Me eae ge PS ae Lee Aenea .. p88 7 ee ae a 2 ee ee Oe | gf-ncae Ps Soe, edee=nee ee ee oeBg dks :ret = BR ‘+ aFe HH ases es on =eFaLg 18 os. He ee bree EC BE pe ar Po SR £2 ca Se ST 2 Ba & iP y... eae ¢ fea oar These kn, nn siga.Se EE:a. 3 ‘=! OF ESB eR | ae : GEE " Sigg LAER SE ieee: Seek Ey. Be Ea oFE = Ee % Big ™ ee 7 . agen ae ; He TE Po Leia aE ° # : . . . SEE od ae woe, jo TEE, ae ccen. baigge, boon fe : . 2 les soe -an : :: .Se .: -Ne Rs se igs Oe eTws, “Se 3wiwey i i. :-= = gens {a ER ee ng PT Se es ae, iB® Sit Fo (NE gsghe 2er UR BESET pen erE> aS ee ae #< ba 2 4:_-=tne . aioe. DON) oe UPDRS eT OSS 5 ce Sees... 3
- . - oe ee
er Lene . : OSLae BieMig ig ooamaogh ee bane , " 8% . . hort LOSE woe OE . . 7- .Len) Ae Ng ny aR PReenee E \;; a: . teh tT :.fms -. a cated ott 22 et egg EES Be TE oo 2 Mg ce : AEE De LR Lo ER SEE Sn a ig TN WEES es 2 ATS : “4 2 are 3 2 t ke = : Da PRLS P EE ge gus ae Tat ee gg Wig
_ - oe eee xe, ao, Co cot ihegl bata? aeraee ae Ss fae!LAS AEDES HEVSS Ths ED Sore Slee SESH Sigeter Seed Metts sania aRRA aTReereTE ae epee? FES. ESE Poeyraged SE feoySB BRT SU eeeae Ee : _:Cin . SISA we. 2:2an LE Se SUL Bo a fe Perag ofEE UBee Ninel SEES ott, edee
. ee ESS oo oho os 7 = rag eens ae a gfe ERAS Ee wit HE JDaeagg: Tpke "sehga SEPM Do casts Ge ee oe
a Pi Sa 2 ee 3E _7SEDGE in ssree Bee) Sanity sed22 t Belay am ohh Be TeinMini fii? Go SGA MRE GnEN paoaeet - _ eee - aieasigDe ee sdoP wa eee . .Be. ee Bees wee SPR Vase SAS iee0 fF eege Sl ag Bees UTS Go gues ey edae . 2...) Acee Be wo age Ee EU Se Sh ee eetb Taeoe
- Soe eee ee ct ST Ts . Joghag}adekL Ses seg mee LE La 8 we ee UE ES Bh aer Drier Pane CSTs ce UE te QOS Bat eek
. ou, PFE sone Tog agaAEE Us AMMGaneiieec OE ET oeMaer eke?eeaas Pe ener DEST eaeeeee . PME eg oe ee Pes OEE, PEfpurna as eB epeetactee 28 lees Se ee Ce . : Ea Reeee a Gee amy ty EY DH DS A ese Can” ak Seabee err Mar tee eh ee es
2ray aS _ 2ab ee amei ae os ae eeely Pid 2 oeBE aaa aeee pe .aeLope SeatPk Sy . . ; . 7 Ee weg: EE ... ee eeBi aip ee ee 2£oe ee ce ‘au a. Po, Se ere ee $8 eee i. 2©Bees... eeaCee et See ogre eer aienss he
. | Stag Lee Bee eS %een “heeleBeem cogEra igeeeeree: aaa Oe eg nist Te. PE . ooere ae pea Riei ee: Eat my.
-
: a OS aki Bo 7 ;,. es , eeSe4eke) a kaaaeeosCOeeeepeo eedE
io . - - eee ome e «BS “eeSE 2 BO: lara8eee eee! RPE Goence : a 2S TFee_”atse Bsee poeeaRie peste _ eee PRoaaigen oo ee : “eee, oo ene cst toe. £. ae &Bee. Be Bl gtBes peeSeaeSug fe i.eeEOE ceasate passe Beckee CBR SRaeeee wees eS = CO ION GE RR SREEE Ege Rae areas pe -
eo ae 2s. en ee ce . : eet: Phe. a a cae =SuHEE feeWacine eeeae Ra NI ieeteeSoSee |okTne eee ie : eeba, ae oe* ageeg 2:yb ae ET *aera a a yn RE po eee ae i i Be : Bo | . . wen ape wee eee a. ees ome ee 2 Fs OeDE He EE Po no ee A ee ie ES See ae 2 2 oe a gesee ape £ey oe aSee eeePeah sto as - pcm cae BS BY ae _—a ee ee po oS *s Haber Fee i= FSee goes, Bh be Se Spear Re 4=Pe poe . . legeFey Bese Sete ce eee. Sees aaameererecrnre7 Bese Se aEsa. - Be Eeaie a 35 fe2 Ee oe HS Pee = ae SORA an ee ae. i. RRR < Seer: eRe . ee ee. .See Be oe:a ba Me ee fee eee Se yee: fo ee Boestae ae 2 = a| ea Sache pe 2 po ea i se , , oe ea Bey enekae «bbe cepers gehamet eeowl aa il ae hie aeeese . aoe 7 eo - L “sLos Se UReet A hai 7 2 Serer ee Be ani aa egmBg - - SRA ite cer neil laa a Seaaa eeeSmeets seit : cen , °:-feoe: a
.a _ =es weet ge ee aie oe tg go SE A a ia Ln
. : ee ee wy EEL 4, SEE 2 SED ae ee ete ee eee —
, .oe ee= = we poBDoS . : . ee i SgOM a en ee= ianee oe ee ES ee ee ee— ee . BE a oS . - nes 2 . BRS She 1 eo re eee pecs te 2
Ae a i” 5 ge , 3 fe lay 1 Spe Re
. ~ . Re, : : | q | , 77| . |:' .. :-—_s . Gs . , . . : : Fig. 3.5. ¢ ign ns acros: , ) Stations across t , | , e countr Da a ; | 3 | y in the 1930s: a repeata ern image ( | | odern i m ebteizi : t ate ee ;)recognizable | : e provinces. Th xamples with Malatya identicalStation );3 ( vows de :) ya(top), | Station ,Mani| ion| tion |al signs: | :desi Station -(mi |
...-|,;.| . 3.5. Prototype design for railroad stations ac th | r
: m Be sy olizing the extension of the central state into th } | ,
| | 7 | | 3 C , nisa Station (middle), and Sivas Stati
E ‘.‘=::5are‘:.—lree°ee * rr ees rc rr —— OE
Imagining an Industrial Nation - 123
eeee r—(i——“ hhh a BO% ON SN ee ee Le ee a 2 Sages x é s ee= ee.ee ee ee, eePOaree Seee eee ee : é ee eR ee OS SS a OE ae i eg ected * 32Sg SO ea ee Ra ieee ee :teSees nee, asroc ee Bae iadwe ee aa 1% Be Ho) eo eee eR ee :.,ee ae Se meas a3See Seiad 2Say 5-k ee cSSees easieeSyne See ae etEee SEE eee Pear: ®beA Wmeg be erent i iHe PES BEN : ee a} geet eeeee eet stg Bude egies PS oeaati: DR ~ Sek io Restos; “4t: 3i Soh ea ete es) Hiey) “i oePee aepelet ae Senay ereus coe oH oisa: be; )ee = foe we Seeas aSEC Bea tateSet Dera | 3ea: a3jHe eeeeHER ate eG 2Eo eae Eee ae. ree ee;
§ Ss ‘ cee ge men es Pat a Pe ere] Boe es cree Pierre acai ee Bieieae!ees gee ess aoes Pg Sy EAE Be ; . aaNeek GaieFaas :me eoaNT heeee b poo t Gass Sere Fee aees > Fi} rg oe 233wy ee 1 te Shel eve 2 ieee eee Pre $ terytach os sataFG we Mere 5RRP heSee SRGeee Aae adrene SEAS oa i et Sp ecg ae i Oa nde, EeSEO geAe eT ns PITOs apg Eg at GL eg eS Mean a, ee Beate Sn ees tay; ‘ Lge Pas : Ba inaoeSe gee Sohn eeapt BEERS AG Ae IE eSBEE ER tSLoe eet
. feet orice me oP es oa eRe Oo NoOe ngSap Stoag’ SEES PeEEA ee aeVig SEE BILE RieSE LeSPIE RL ee Le eed MtaShh Bee SE 4,tid Hho pee 3: aye easPe ee ae eeeSere BRokhee ES mA WOR RE eh Dec7 eer Leeae arte ooh2:SretSD, Pee ats sta REtcae RON DWE es ee Ay ete in DEOL Moree. Ss oh cogn oRR IeBO OoE We Eee eee ne eRteLie OSraed OESuePTT ee agt pea :gtRede Lae #3 ek a Pee: Der Bieteewe i Secor se Oy be Seay eee is es Bip fle nt Rhee aes, pate en oe ge Pere 52 ee ea 3
; yop Piles SP eae AR ee Sues Sper ee ees Boe es ert La eee a, Rake cu ae Ae es SOP aa aes, ERE SEL Lg eee Pex Rise new reh os i conn ee ee ; ;oePee Rend Gao, ie. emoh a een opei he oer eee SNDGoes na ae Sie Mg SE Ss airees ist ENG res PERene CLUES ITA ey BI RSA ALS Reeeee a eSal ayLear | Re eas aay ghRap ee Scone earGES oe MOK BSRES eaPet Reis Ae) Res BiteOeSEG AOL Sy DS eseTB Pee eephar eeeerat 5. ia Se © ek %
7ace 7 Bab eT ee at? ‘ REay eeesate ae Poe S Dee okays EereatOTM San haa ae ROSE eee Veweken a SRP oi ae 3 eaten * ARENT seerape Ruaere ee SR OLE Ia boBee EWMae TERT es TE EOS at GH De UEC R hee ICNSCORE GN teedee aeee ae:ene
Seat, mt hatSei ASees ll >= “Apt ae) Estate Ee ts eicet Paine Dats WE a heERLE se ape ORAS a aoe gS Eig heAON ag DEA te See Aa Sheers Te Kany BE iesBeFig aceNee tahCa natal s Ze 25%; Sree Be:ee ae CON SR skme raeEnte StatsNe ate otOe PSE: pC bie eeseeSNE Lecere tokeSso SEM Cer pear ost ERESee rd yee enSpear Reick ERE Oe ataEU art ede esSedge! AOE Sara tesOe alent eeeae TIOP os ee se henna ss Yiee Vi PEL ae ‘ fe cart 5 RRt sea ele ose, FRGMetres Be Rite Ee tees ee ad ks er ek PEAS Soeeeocc hig Oe OR Te OTIS eon CIS Be iDon esata tes:ae- iW. ShaE erees: egSee Gigs See
Cieaes eae es eton IIR eG A=CESree aeR oe ees pylperacoesnagad SS (Ue wage eee 4;pe:‘.NE ot. zota ;™mar ep eeee iptBs ech ea pea Sete SSE OMY aI Sian es A OEE PaO ONE Mein ikeeateey in Oat: ”%Sg lSPe a Es aioe ekeshte axis 4] .Meh pe Rel eeGet &aie en) ébes ee aie Bek eres Capra warrn MGA eg WIN a tate Set ES reYOY Leen conn eos ee 3Shey, 3boc ee ae ene pA een eerie AO reOu PES BpBISpe? ae psBee BRR ESE > PR |AR See Pie RS argh COP cag: Sie TIeBeas Ens F Ses Steeae Be gts ae ep nsLeeRe eTMee, Oe phn Bie tee ee teTEE aba hates Oop POSEN prise neeTTT RONDE OSE ;aie Re Beetae eargene Serer rue
FPES ay ee ae * pews : cee ya oeERE ae ANE Cag ails he Pull mys ge en EO rag R agate Eieae a fet ces owe ee Paseo eas ee : ae CU ee ee Re at Sette Nites fawoh Ae>eReasxy ceoesetitcah Oe OsEO a Sa eeexBib Beet eecofss operaOh rieke toby Om aera a senate hago eee Hoy Tae a LDGame ec A aoeieee oe a EOUe ele NO POS DORE A Ors |aoae Eee tyee Dae
ee es MAIO aoe aoery Seeenan she : Bg isit! oprere Shes AE LONE A DR BE Oe ee Ree a ea Ene SOE Pe eh SMe hees oteOR aseSRN oe oe Re ome poe Paes Parag ett Oe AEbeeSD Cette, Rees Gs Se ERY Nore ea bs RO CEE Pale eere Oe oe ee Poi edge Stn Ae Me RS ting Ponts tas 86feetk EvteaRae aaron Say Big Seohi Year * pS Sere Sea PG Lefhto OsPIO ened ROG Senne BtSTS Tesi erere A ie Pot NiraAG seh tg EDIE BA Sakon Sp oe Arta 8oot Beer Ea At |GRAN os opr eh EE Ne Rees CRC OOoFORE Pir WilkeCIBER et ees weg es os Ee al fever tr Gsan te esee oe eee ak oeSee bs Se ae Bereen
:cySate ‘Shae A Dia 0 Mg 4 >pitier ete Ee ieee PRE ek OS acena pexereeates 34% i as 7 5a% -E‘ NS Sete © ce rats ee ee pg o~ eePe toy are seetale ins Peer 4S Oe ese ree Meee i Age eets5iei axfetivsstst ; Bo aS ReogNs ase eres LEER ce©Fes eR RSAGE ETS écame Aare SE os se ANALG 4‘’oe me 2:| ‘itd yeFsittriae as mise ientiaae oo De er es eee: etree 17 — Belgika > 32 — Trakya pavyonu 45 — Ada gazinosu
3 — Saghk > 18 — Uziim Kurumu 33 — Sark Sanayi. Turyaé 46 — Luna Park 4 — Parasgtit kulesi 19 — Hava tehlikesi Pamuk mensucat, Yin 47 — Ath spor
5 — Sehir miizesi 20 — Hava gazi mensucat, 48 — Nebatat Bahcesi 6 — Stimerbank 21 — Romanya P. 34 — Polonya pavyonu 49 — Kr kahvesi
7 — italyan paviyonu 22 — Denizli P. 35 — Is. Bankast 50 — Helalar
8-8 Sch > 23 — izmir Ticaret odasi 36 — Sigorta pavyonu 51 — 9 Eyldl antresi
9 — Manisa » 24 — Sergi sarayi 37 — Inhisarlar » 52 — Esas antre
10 — Yunan > 25 — Fuar gaziuosu 38 — Ser 53 — Antre
11 — Eti Bank 26 — Fransiz P. 39 — Giimriik Binasi 54 — Gill bahcesi 12 — Vakiflar paviyonu 27 — Kizilay 40 — Tenis Kuliibti 55 — Sun't gil
13 — Ankara Birasi 28 — D. Demir Yollari 41 — Atig Poligonu 14 — Filistin paviyonu 29 — Telefon kdskti 42 — Acik hava tiyatrosu
15 — Kiitahya Cesmesi 30 — ingiliz P. 48 — Hayvan paviyonlan
Fig. 3.23. Site plan of the completed Kilttirpark (1939) showing the addition of pleasure gardens, pools, recreation spaces, and an amusement park to the more formally arranged original fairgrounds.
| 6° agvinin l a
4 mM ning an Industrial Nati .
; saree ay oe: ‘os4:SiEx Mee ek ;fy es 3 SH Uae RE a ieee acted bi. PR RGSS RECS i ne BE Ae Ree aha ue: IN Cae S Ee eS — ee ie
Be ete tere PEt tieso CAP See ESS OX Reona Petty neRe bass & ae PEERS AAIMatety y ee a $; atek ee Te aihee AP Eagit pita tiehectare Paes PRS geeoe altBe Sree es Rae See Pe Fe Oe ete gk ae ie Ne asiaWeen a aS coh eres ea ee pee Pld aBe Agee tee co)peERROR AR Pgh 5 Bsae, Be Ceore NOLO SeeAX. er Scare eeeReh es eee Sore ey me IN oS Uo sah b cad lait ze ain Ske Re Sta ho pian Sed ORS SE A Rein ts LEE PO oe: Pe pean eis Meats Suki Lae SSPE a nate Paes BES tas a Oh ala eeBee ee See eSe. ee ee Roe Ph Pgh ROPE Xe Ge AEN ECS eeae hey are Re SR eeead eee tea ssBees SG eee Seite Bane ange Rie eeBoe iiss ih Be Oe ee poEp ihe oe ae ae ree fesath iarave Gece ey: Scene woe oe Sg etCS eee pee POI Sa Rp Mes ON 8OE: SASS SoS ve! eee: pee RLS aBE Oost ew EEO SL SNE
OA See ie Pe asa Seen red piece es oe ee Ee Rae he oe Fe bg ee one oe oo Syl ae pee ey oe ee oe ee be senate eae Ge Per Une, es eePee Se ae ee Ce ae one OSes ey Sse ce ee PaO Lanes nlaean aate Mey teint 3ESLone sii CN ie ioBF oiees eeom b BPG Saar Panag: Peni oie boat cee faerie beSeSte ene Be ee ego EO pe eegoes a es a Sa oe a ee -ee . :oe ayaa Orman Vash gh Dect Im ieeee eROa ET asBete gaat Oe ete ee seeeee ieSeis Me ee ee ee ee eseEE BRP orp Pe ag tasee OS, Se oe GS Se aan Ee ee ae OIE ERAN db CAG Bt Be My oe ears Aes aan te Dee Pee ee ee ae Soper eet pa Pie Be Paes ais Ses eee ee ae se aie Be Risin 3 pee See eee Be hay ae Gis OP: eS Pea See ees COS ie KA nie es ESE ORGS Ble Ee OC onan Seem Oy BN IG itp ars Be ones Peas, Se a Se OS SgaeIIE Bi aS Aged aged os wee ieee er 6Be a fee eZ ie Kite ee. aS: |oe EEHe TER BaOE ete eePE ae,CR Se Bae ate A ES SLOG a Sapir sacs alo te ete! Be iree ngs aaa aeerenee eS ESSes oeeS 2ee oe | .Ree ¥,Hoes one bi: Fe agree: gr, Ret nite he me FOE. I pee ee poe Es ie Nee PEGI AF ee POEM se MS See Rae IS SSeS SE i Rome HOS te anes eS Wes ree i eee iese Oia E sane 8 ewes MSS ARB OaN atg Wie ees ICI te CTE a ean Pieas fe ee ete Ee Oe Ce oes een aR IRMA eae TNS eas ceper ash Espee eens EL PSs Re aLES aPPR ey ee aSeeSR See eeoS oe mon GSR EGON Ek Sy iSBieta EB ee SIE Ti peng CeHk Rees Peeae oeee | ee eee eeee aes oes oe ee byes PEs ereteteb ee Ee ter oe oeBRET hn Bie po bee aeeSO |ey ee eePoe Pe eee hee .ee Si as aaS es ae BCE re ic Dire Rees Se sides EG ah ieLe ES Dean, Acces SSIS Pie es 5 Pee Ee eees ROS Cotes VRE S eeieas oe SG eee ae os eee Gerke ct Eee Sig BOREL Ries PR Ge Lids Seis CB) tee mene pee teat ees. eee Cake ee MBB ire ESienae Bee ae OSES ie OES an meee S RO rr oes ib Pos pee) ee wa Pee Meee ie ES LOS, eS ROSE SORES < WEB E oe rae: seed
Coe Bee Ce erates Oe eee Be ee EAE oe a RE ES Be cee Seely: Sho poe Se CE es EON Se RG Ce as ae Se a - oe
a ge ete SEP ts ene DD are Mg peep aasc eed ee4 isa Pee eee©Regs eee Gee ©OU ACree pe3See Pees ee ES ees cates Ree ress: eaeed LORIE Oe ise AK okt oteRegie Ee ae Se tteDeepa % SGT BE §&Bong CS Pee tars ees eeaees eeee a ee Oe oeeee tapPSEC Sih EE OE ee ce PERE EN Crate Eee EE I lSOEE ee ners i ME OTeen Spo eid toe neee Brae &Wares wea ie oiees eeoe Soe CIEE Oe ssSe RO ee, Mace, So eeoe ee Fee Bene ge) ESRC NF eg BU co ape Seas ae ceIe Beene ei See 8EN eres ha SeRea ee ee es PES eee ates ee ore DSRS peer EE Ren OTE OE, Le pyla OE Seed aeees ee rae aes tae i cn or Coie Coke sat Ce See = oe Pe ge ce hen Tig A NE MB cpesic AER ao Efile Che nae ROE 8oeaS bus tees be ©:FESS es Cr SEE YE oe ae pe ne ee BP Sees EE ibe PEZN SBOE Gis og MT caMRS DO ite ee oes oe SET OPT Se: oSre NEO RO oe 3 Brod 2es POH Ek Gesoe ekeee Gioeae oe ae, we EeGo SOO pe BOE TeSe HS, @ EB Cee, EE sie aeen isPome SS PENIS Gee: BOO ELSees hi vies creas eee =ee oe
Biever 8 SA EER St ere a Wee Sa Oger ORC Og eRe gos, eos Baie Pied one had De Been Gee SRK = Soe oe Bene aie eee eee Bes Pome LSS Ore een Baris ee Bee RPE es eee ee Be es oe Nie eeear ee en ke ce rca eee my eee aes aSree hos EFL Soueed ee ee eeee es ee eee aoe enBee xe, Oe eee Pee GeSee ee eesBat Be ea Gee See odSe eeepeng Cs Seas PSESE raek CeresRe SOPree Se IR ee SRR Seo pas eeueidiot secs PINON StBaSerer hh okee Pein ee ee bee Be$tnBias oe Seay bese eeoaBees ee oie ek. eee ae ee eee Sera Sse eid ah ao PER NES ster BRE eee tote oeBayh Se eee oe Bee tee be PNees Feo? RESO aee ea Bee cp Wen we PitisSe BAAS raeeae sid oP ectsbe re Ror ekeOS eee Pee Meroe gears ryyeWe GeeBoe ee a ae ee aes Lote tae te eeee tsecs Pe ees Re ne cee PR ERS a Lei es eee ee2ee eeEe POPS J Bs Foe pat osSag Shr EOS ON bi Be eee ere: Got fake Chios seen Pe See ok ny Be Bees NE Roe tAoe aes A te roe Wes sees | aes Pies ern. See Ae OLS klRAP RISES Sie PER Oeie Rar eee ; eee Se Be Fee SBIR brie ces tee Beat Pe A eee bees Seas SFtag Ieee BEA OO RN ee Se be aaeAh spo Poth RE eg SAS eet Mook peeieOg is OGRE eae tite SiR As OS eee es Beeres eee Poe Vee iOE SOS Fs eaves RC & ced Bees ete Gs See : ieee RsBich Sates Seek Cees Ort IISpa ESod AOS leeee es oF We We es eee go an a raat as te got ee piri ee EGE ee Soe Cake SIREN Be ~ Be Gree Pee ee po & ee. Bees ak BE oe Ren ES es POE EP Sr ents LEONI, POR Cee rena BP CR a EES oe Sen Ba Leia fintete OG aK SPoe a naman ei ROSS eters ee See: oe Wea Sires Bees aes LEA eed Bese SEs tec er 4 ps Rees a ee ee FP 5A tees Neate athe” Ee SNe oe lee he Cat i ee ae US SAS ak Se nae Ree ; igen Bie oe Oe | stn Gee Rest Be Ber i oS 8 Roe Bee o Sr ee po Ae en RAO Eee Sie ees oo a ey ee ae peg Lee Seo ate, Bet ey Oe # #3 Se aie Eas eeto Be Cc ORs a eeeereBee 4Beroe we RSpnaeeeCRON eeeeee AES Be pe ceeaehesae MO eaeeBE gee oF Ee Og tae phe SEES iG ek a ch oom oS a se Be ee ATS OS ; of 5 He Bae Soe Bis oe cee eo bee ERE eens Pee Peer REO Gee en Sg Sid POE ei ene PereSN AN CRpale Oy ee Dope yen 2ees eeSm Bo eRSe Roee er BN eeEM Seed a ROS Bet Bb es Soke Be te Bee SOE OR Ae ihes oeeos Gees Coa LOSS eoe eketes eees So pe aie SRT Wee Pee Uotpi tacagen Re eon ere: cs Oeee ie5" 294] 1 ee BreRous wee Meee BESS Pci @s.eed ieeePR teoe Soe eonOS ec Payee oe Cees USPC NDERI 05 ee ee Ok onSe Seek OX Sake, RAK ae$2 BESeeee Soe Se Be Wop Es ere oeNCO eee SBCoe a ee eSoe
Beers Se: i Ge re ee ee fit Bee ET ene See anmg Prk ckee | aes Bon BEE eas Oe oe ee eetid Re Beer at eeAbe Co
Q ae i : 4 nce oe % : : A = ae ES Sy ae bale: pe oes Sa oe ae wee ees & REE ie RS PEN ER ee er I b Ate Cte hte LO OK ale Ms eee iA ats Breas a OS OR Re 2a ee fet ee oe Lipid weap ST es Pee Pe er See Ie = EOS
-a,;‘:‘||i|
eta igs Geto wn AY TOE oe Gorey ae iatBees ils Oe mabye PTE FOS sae eos estes < ee gies ene 3Bes ueeshoe Sat ee eeEen Pee a esORS eeRODE Pe Eee eesOe Bess Lee oe ee EN Ck RepCake thisAR Seek acai eee iesMalate eg GOS Pe , all ae Fe ats CEM B DW igy hay: 7 ae wo sO . , Fe - a PR a7 ~ cel - —_ ° \ Gee 4 - voy! , . a, ' | Mira ett.fyRNS Pee hen‘ aE°re eft per’. ¥ we .- Su0Seer ommee, “OS mg VT“Saree . . ’ > -* -. , Ds >) SPAS twee aeSay, 1 ty, np Be th a : a eo . ress STF. . -Y es . + GN bed ~coo woe Nay M ’ _ bes Cer ‘e EOahte wee? vos52teeere finaeeBN 28 ak no - .re ae ~ . ve‘.osoa a ey #) Say a weds osoR a esge ti TERRE EPO ae Pegs esSee ee a .cack AUT Maths gS SR ERE fee I SSeS EP it OP Rta ager aeaya anre ee)Me oe Race es SS ora eeoree SEEy peg 2. Ses re. id Soe ae i :CE anawee ~ , aoe Pep ope tiectAge Setater ERA
Peacefy 265 SS Pay watI. Pg ERTS CakeNR Pd PaEE SS Bice Ba Pe boeS JE dePereare Ee PA epee : Ny SEN
“BN te,eeei Bot. ereian* aray Ss RECERERC Pe) Oe ee in “fe eeSPERM nee eer renee rete arrCTE renOAS tiragerccesi meen SeSaneeaS Sans eee MESS ADEbe FERRE! ‘ Ey,as an POT ey 4 Par :9 :. ’.: me E SRT gehen ee y ae f}THis aanstDiageas PSDewore aacRahn? Teacrcmccna Sint Wet aiCRE aesTERM NE Coan eee H : os REE, a Bee QS eae: 95 |gioko mm” Soe nn a SeTioeRe : usarae Sar heears eee GL dant: ee MM ian ONGts ROE SOE DOR Sree Soran
Po Be Pe moe Fi 2 jp: +: gE A aol Oe otis Saal ola Be hee, * tg oe ee ASR eee IE ee
pr SRLS ar MGR AGT ENP aSER Raye SBS Ge / SES” sresemer’ enor 28 | Bae ‘i ‘ og 9 a OP ays Rae Se OP Rae Pak Ot OE eee eee Be cateee Bee ARR era Trae an Pee Pee ep seaese yf SRE aa joe J pat Ts NA 4 y HS jy LAE peta BLES a ag RT ee be PAVE PR aie Ge ee Po Gh Pree eM De Uy CANS 1207 (05 AM ae? LA ge od 1g re eae Sor ee i Leash See ieee ‘ fi aS 42 Aa\ Gaee CAD Come Seed a Gaon, Ss fy 9 Ea f ER st & sep Tg Le Pe foe. fe figee: opa mare, semen ayaawee ekOME i 0 Be if SS RE Bae ee PETES ns >0 06 i meRe PPE H Sica ipo Meee 4 py ease, O* AT;CE tbaEU ecaape 2b. sos ve Ba teaFe” Rage 8 ee natLS LieTey kt i eS ogceens i, Ais fanpeae “a_ ie Yy OSE eh ODA GA Bip poeta buh (alo, Qe en
eae Sf OEE INS eg ae eaten oe eh: ere pero tie erm 4 ESE a PH Joyo tell | § y aca Ieee PN PRES TS GO he Do ESE ie BG EE ES
VeaFE 2 SUR ane Qh gay FER bg ba isate oh EIpie PENS eas tad a ee BP re TE5baaSiar etl :Se j BLY f oer hb EB PES agi dey ot RG ae ie To Be oe Peas rl Se WO APPS Ro ae eee era. an NH Ppa Pe ET pap Ete eee ee
i np SARS Ss ccf eee’ bad Ce Oe 8 Precis | Sateen Us tis : E nana wae & ‘ aoe Sy GE ve, a pak ee gh hi BR ge LE ee Be RT
Hees i, eae hefoo fttaes pee ateee a) Seer pd ETF Cle a0keeBi [PE ENS | oye A th28a .ABME ae co ESes GD) ans eee caeOecana eeePeele ia elof es wo et HF . aanao “oe et wee ERED ee FiA pia yeeR eesSON eR ns eae oe a+ aa ee -ee:renee weeFE TeaAs re TPT Ado, an ina BEL: OR Sea °F Seri ceils oe
Bee BLD Fag ect Ea ERA siceend | esata Eee Reif Sache 2 ately ie Ore ee anes eee ee ne aan wt =tyme r |¢aay 7noteI»et *|a“.NS wy lag ade.By BeafBeet oh Pg be. PX. ged oo |cr po ca+ Sees tenes ma RIG Oe a GER pe . SasBA RRA Ptah ee oe he wert TE eTan ies oe pa A . Le fe. 8|6 Bey ek Vee Bn i Boss fig e MR Ag
| af eae 77 la ¥ “a fe SD iY yg) Yn aw BSP on . - Ree ter tee ne bg SNe Ge oh a Be Seal cae a ee ae |LSaraeam 3:he Aleae we ieLNsaoe asOT egPR EG ee ERE rere PoCotepre *orkraCEEyoo. ao LILNT esa Tae a REA PSE eR GS. 2 os ee oROTH i: Seneca Dt gl Nene Poi.eee ey re eeBs ied Saaie, . we VeeoF PSI NL poe LO ERORMOD EES Seer 205 7) Strain) Sree ;ibe, RRO, EASE OEDT SS eee beeen ere ee wth ENG Foss Lure ar Aes ane Mi ne MONIC Oe nt RES SEN EEE SOE vee iMW ee Pame ge Oe Peet gap foe Ok yd ee: 5 BAe Ms eg etary Cenees MERE ree eens ie aera anee meat
ee RRRe sgeT OEetaeOO nementn,: ees ea Eenu iP OME, Pa eR ES o oe itn oe PRN saanNMRA the ee OBS 6 tte. Gog 8 va?Po EE ON Ay PP RP a a
,Reee Toe pees eed bey: ee pe eS ee a Re Fo ia ee ety me one ee eee ee i te ee poh LS Rana | ieee TP fe =e 4 CA ee OS Be ee HoaURES ¢ ib oSdk| ee Syren CteceeeoseeBes re aoea4 es WOheeSEN 8 OO BEanEE : :ay. fg. LE: eo ef PeeHell vee aher fs yeet feteA > feo Nanas WE mpi Sapeap, ot Neti ive aes: rt Ly |PE oes cee f cae Pabnen Poi fred a 6 : {a!, Pc gye s, SOABeCer SATA re cane ne VieLot teesWests Bee CREne eR eee A ge tone ge LE mahy mei, Pas? east “oe POaaPeanIE OE PP aM RELEONT Si na wie PE Reaeren ee
Decca ee By FY Re OO ae? pape UP Tepes ee a She le ee ot
| I ea ie en ee ee NO I | Ogee ne a ak ES rene CREE | Fs tierce ee Cernig 41 Be OP Cree ORES CMTE BONE oe Os ee ee
i? co ES RSME SS Fee MOR RCT IaES ee MN EEO CFT SRE ORDRELD HOLE tuo et ete Die 0 Cn ay SOO - ne Sed PE aD . cae £3 y 2 vs SEES SE SINR LIAIR OM a, SED NERY REROIE BEESLEY SOL PETITES TE
EP Aas Pa SE af SEE Sg aE Rn SR Be TLS ne ence oF Na ee a See Ee) as ed GO OPED ED ee eRe Sony Se Oe ee if oe CER BLE on 8 ne fa Rtg ONE BR fl SRR CES Bae ge La ae ee atl IBAKAN oe oY ORRaeeease SP Jo Ts Pe eet eRe ee fe,tee Anaa as TG =, Yjod£ be oe ES fovea agg pee GEG, IEE I EGE iLIGES ok BeSS SED BIE ROE aI oe MPC Nae Sp pe Ee ooayAUIKARA tnmua APARNA ABE oeEPet FeO oe ARES SB STS pea ED ee tie:G|feet ise aeeS aT8eeReet
ee Commpemay Mirai wore ee ee eee ee ee i ee Ae je |: ae Ura VE
etaES SkySoSeWO, ES tk Stee Teh ak, er REER a wes pie OP 2ateeegfAes vateS es: — a “5 ene + : ?fr)S at ‘ ee adaor Bhsre. 2 OAs SEEPS Bauisigoaly EEELaERIN Ce aae a ERM DgOS ee odes IE akce TeoeUS eg Se ’ AaPEG arnt
ee en a eee oe ee ee ee eG ee : - x | corte
Ss SE MINER PROFESO TAU Ce be ee EE BE LE Se Oe Ir oe Sa i SRS DEG TORE SE . . : ; Lag : :
SSS BREY gn os SR TIA UES ONS CE ys eB Se OE cal Pe IE TR OE ee BR . os . ore , Oe ETE Se AE] DED CESSES TSS BRE RS PR eg SR Et ERIS MRE SE TS Pn Sho SOUR Mines Boy tera, io ge Wan tt ENT a PUPAE EO Yigg a Rag te a 2 a ‘ nore: . ss
7. oo ge , 7ya wo. mS oF 8. APP To Oy aMR meee SE «gore ee ey eet . + an SO ret i Sot nb tae OC RRS OP RG UE, : wy ge | Sn are + . . Le . Se Se a Ee Bae ea go Le ; Ve . ; ae ° . : Oo TE EE ERY 7 eee . : ae oe GIRS BA CANLIGE a :; .poe : we, SPOS RAGE ee on ee 4 ; sannemees aaa ANZAD Auiyia Ap i: ATA . cy . re reer LS, wo
-? ; ’ ;.:ve SOR ea re. LOT Te: | oye Bomw anes): ~.‘| ey e , © SAUAL AR . . rg . ay Sage kp i “te°
7,nee| ee =< .=ASak " ; oo. 9S 49 8bAB: foswtat pe, gett PO AEs. A : Pease | . .MNATARASS 2 ORMIMA SARASE Veep Th it tae jenn! bese: ee a 7 oS SERVES SAMASL 7 28.82 48
on aBEN Zos ns read © eros rant! bs SSaAcceN eo TPhated a Gr)BES Bence tage avir ; oe ETERAS SARASL 29 66 AE tea 06!Bae MaacaPIES pacesEME Sacre oe warren SURE osafehe ye: , ae oe OU 2S soeSfel,
OA PebePods akGRUB RM ey Wh: eee ’wiyap ', wei ay SS STUDER eee |Qe coneRe aeson edpane “ET ie ou eaA FEieUS VATIVETS DZone Shoo Se oe pelo E RISo> Ee ge Be O8 os
oSal DO4NGREM VRE)ed a a. eee assoff? | eo"" A e| a A ar| wie ep SRE ie OES at . ‘ MoBO : Ss omte en ee REN MES Go 35 504 STLJ Bk 7 :cotton : J 2voatooe en NOP DAS Po86SA teeter,
fo Hi oe “ aAY \e i- xSapa ae ¥yy. sadGe LA: rn. 2 vg tgp eo ci i.: We _bn x%| PRR FOpaM DAINE S scare in) iw ==T 7 fr PERNT NEA) | wf.aa3. ee ed Po Seen. % F : : aby) ein, MLLLS BINA SAHASI | 72.46 ce eR eee Coe) Ome (se Meter 3)! Rees fs Zaha 7) ae LESS AS ae Lid L/L OTUBNA SAMASE 39-66 af! eee Be ee eee Xet oe es ele ac a Porras cet ; . ‘ ; ! | SEETIY SAMASt 21. Bo
°:.:.‘
oS ee ae ee eh oP Aa Sere] od dey Pp Re et toms tote
Bas Ge tei Bei ct set ctu oo arsed TI ville th is.po wt Yo J orueve op ssp | ah. TARAS SAUASE SDR ad.
eke oe a eS SeGEN | Hee: ase Manes 8Srey goecics Saas eis ie eee ea : .:eT Owes neEE ee be saeRY, Cee DS ee54° ree icee Es CEO SCARE § ICORI A Ae eeenobey, oo paspa Boeae Gesctaiad PPS RS es CARS WS OE ECS. ASEREE RCO SETI OR NR Gist ae SERB EEA REE SC BEE ae . aJpeBee : a Sewpig es.al pgaeee hl inte
Po he Poe eed peeeas ee esl errr, Cier. aerro Pose da, ol) ABS eee eeeaeCpe ae Re eee oe | et eae Mae Pymeee Le . ; ga eeaPhe OAS nOJo gs eeaeeee USN pet ere SE nsiecc REesFe a. oeee ee ;Dead agtiwg KESIF Ae Mb e Oe Bee gk Br es CE | oe os rs ei: is . " : Pe ESS i RAPER A MAS: Whoa 2A TL? A (ore 6CeTE iem>SOEod oSeonBPN Me ee:PRIYY aeos GeSN ©vr we, aeeTHES PHS gi‘- otOn OR pl AUP: Ese VE Rea tind CONOR ES i ae iad Loy nadaet he talan UE adeB ree DOTA on - we ~ “Shor 5soe peSUGAR RM cfSOO ee PROFESSOR EOIN PR as ce onions tse inn ht aaaeaN Sinise — aE .. naa hE aoe i eeSEMINER BAB STOUUE DAS MARES TE SP aio RST Ee EOE ER UPS ST OS EO ena Meng aE EERE Oe REE Ro gE vets ESS Be GES SEL : : Pp MESES ES SOF woe 8 Bg Un oag 2e RIE Ben ie mee
an eh ee Eea 8 ERE ON ES ne SE OO ee eeENE Pe, aoe Rees iSES aoOe oesor fC er ne reAGREES :Gnme A Re SROs een OE eee eee aCUS eePtCe ee oots :be SES Oe MEN Be ae eee aGea RE mo, RMS ges ace es a ate eesUS DeRN ee Lee ee aETE ce eae EEee ae egdhe TO DESERET Me ee ge .Ue yo BORE ; nt of SUT Bee ey i Ra ep TSE oe PgAe 7 gag Ra gs 2 mm Cog DE GgoD Io Pars ese eh ee? ht a SeSSSSSSSSSeSSeSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSeSeeeSeeeeee Fig. 4.4. Student projects for Directorate of State Monopolies employee housing assigned by Bruno Taut to his architectural studio at the Academy of Fine Arts in 1937-1938. Top: Site axonometric e
drawing by Suleyman KOokttirk. Bottom: Plans for three-story Zeilenbau-type apartments with two.
and three-bedroom variants by Ulvi Basman. Students were asked to provide detailed specifications
for materials andcosts Icul diff or materials and to calculate for for aliterent typesfofuni units.
-;
ki of aMaking Modernist Profession ————— 168 - The P .
cB ee eS ee HESS Eolas SREP e Eos pee , REAP _ 2 he RE : . seein hed TR EE fae pea Ee SOTA EE eeabag
Acree a AS eeeadieu i . °a STE soe: oe ee Be |a:7 : SOREL RD ES eeee Fe :ee ns Lae toe :ge > ‘ eS ie . . SE 2: ae Pica 28 e BLY : Ei Lian Rear2ah: BOER
: ee 2 SEP 2 IES nal Jenigg | . . o: : fa : fee : puddles TAB Sige vii EU SG aie OR ee
. ee ee ee es Beee eecB MRR an, ahead) Bg ins eeEP peoe ca ba dee es ee | ae See aetaeeg Beg 8s ee Beeeeeeepee aoerEor pete seee SES ce ee sos SUS Se ee ee a eee Fis apes eearise eee a eSeee eter ce a —rrr—SAE Bes PONE Sines eee ee: ee BE OATS eaecae eer Fe eaeans Ee et ee ee ee aegis eee ee he et pe .Sap aSRE : oe eee igs Hace is2: PR dur as aebe Se ae Seen ie Soe Base POE eS eee ee aes Seeee eaeeee SEaeS SEeee es eee. en 5 “Eee eB TPn ee (Re eee SEEN testi Ra Ce ereepee eee eteee graces aurcagy £5072 : Fa ae Beteeee eee eeSeptr . romper Teer ee WR et aie 23ene See eenseaten eae ea Ua meres ee ee ty ee = ae SUS A EER See, ara ae eee eee a Slee EE oa ee - a 2 ESS ites os + SATS ECU RAR niet a Ba PM re ao ee ie cs
ne aa tail :OSS Ce ee Jo oe lc “aeHis iSe peer ee— etree eee bie), Pen Cogs ESeee Be rus nocea eePesce oea ae ea eae -= ne BNA 8ar TEM PES og eae ee eee Sais! Taare ee eee Ce emi DRTae Cyr RSee tS Re ee ee Pos os ee ee A,?Baie ee oe oe eemre ee Gee 7a In another essay, “Economic Considerations in School
Design,” he emphasized the lower cost of building, wherever appropriate, more stories than the two-story National Architecture Renaissance schools of the 1920s. He emphasized maximizing the ratio of classroom area to total area, rationally placing auxiliary spaces such as the gym and workshops in basements and on ground floors, and optimizing the area for these purposes on the basis of the number of students. In these essays, Zeki Sayar made frequent references to European, especially German, examples, illustrating the first essay with photographs of an elementary school by Martin Elsaesser in Eschersheim, Germany. A survey of published projects in Mimar and Arkitekt over the 1930s reveals a consistently “technical” language with which projects were described—a privileging _ of programmatic, constructional, and economic criteria as determinants of design.
Dimensions in plans were explained with respect to intensity and nature of use, choices of materials were discussed with reference to factors such as cost, hygiene, and ease of maintenance, and distances between blocks were explained in terms of angles of the sun, in the way Walter Gropius explained them to the CIAM in 1930. Furthermore, like their contemporaries who were shaping CIAM doctrines, Turkish architects’ professional self-definition was not limited to their being experts and tech-
nicians. It entailed a much larger social vision. What is particularly remarkable inthe | professional discourse on the New Architecture is the unequivocal linking of modern
forms to societal transformations unleashed by the industrial age—an age that was , only an idealized potential in Turkey, not an accomplished fact. “Modern technology and the development of mechanization gave us many new means to do our work and many changes in our construction methods,” wrote Samih Saim in a 1931 piece titled
“New Elements.” “To adapt to this new lifestyle, many elements of our buildings , changed their forms or radically renewed their character. Thus hitherto unprecedented forms appeared.”35 These new elements of the New Architecture, adapted from Arseven’s book and partly derived from Le Corbusier’s five principles, were roof terraces, pilotis, horizontal windows (or “logical windows” [manttki pencere], as Samih
Saim called them), color, and electricity. , Evoking the same argument about modernism’s being a universal and thoroughly rational doctrine, Behcet Unsal made a similar correlation between social modern- , ization and architectural form. Addressing the public in a radio program in 1939, he explained architects’ espousal of the New Architecture in civilizational terms: it was a historical necessity, a mark of contemporariness (asrilik), rather than a stylistic
choice or fashion: . }
The Making of a Modernist Profession »~ 173 = ——— These terms [functionalism, rationalism] that have just entered our language and these new modes of living that are beginning to effect us are the reflections in our country of a larger universal and social transformation. In our machine age [my emphasis], with its changes in mentality and lifestyle, our large wooden houses with spacious sofas [halls] are no longer appropriate. That is why the necessity arises for moving to a small home or apartment with corner windows and rounded projections.*°
The message in Unsal’s words was that modern forms and design principles were rational products of the “machine age,” which, although not yet a reality in Turkey, was a universal phenomenon and therefore “our” machine age as much as anybody else’s. Although there was no direct causal relationship between the social and tech-
nological transformations of the twentieth century and the particular forms of
modernism, Behcet Unsal’s rhetorical leap from “changes in mentality and lifestyle”
to corner windows and rounded projections was characteristic of the modernist polemic. So were rhetorical leaps from the definition of the architect as a technical expert (who solves design problems under given circumstances) to the idea of archi-
tect as an agent of civilization (with a larger mission to transform those circum-
stances). The former legitimated the latter; rationality and expertise became compelling grounds for discourses of social engineering and technocracy.
Architects exalted this larger role of agent of social transformation and reconstruction, which elevated their stature in the society at large—something particularly important in a country where architecture was traditionally seen as a lesser vocation associated with the non-Muslims of the empire. In their writings they articulated this self-declared mission to teach the people how to live in civilized and contemporary ways in accordance with the Westernizing reforms of the republic. The technocratic discourse of modernism as articulated by Le Corbusier and the CIAM offered them a model. For example, in an article titled “The Architect in the City” in Yeni Tuirk Mecmuasi (Journal of the New Turk), architect Faruk Galip explained this new defnition of the architect as follows: Today’s architect is no longer the old builder [kalfa] whom people hired to prepare plans and build a four-room house. He is a scientist [ilim adam] who delineates the social and economic politics of the country, organizes her civilizational character, builds her cities, and provides the working people of the nation with comfortable and airy spaces of recreation and work. He is an artist whose reputation will transcend national boundaries and will place the imprint upon history, not so much of his own name, but that of his nation.*”
This dramatically expanded and idealized definition of the profession was the major theme in the inaugural issue of Mimar when it appeared in 1931. In an important editorial titled “The Architect Inside the Building,” Aptullah Ziya articulated this new professional definition of the architect beyond the boundaries of technical knowhow: “The whole world admits today that the architect is not a builder who constructs our houses to shelter us from rain and sun. He is an intellectual leader to guide our
————— 174 «. The Making of a Modernist Profession
social life [ictimai hayatimiza yol gosteren bir miitefekkir], a thinker concerned with our comfort, hygiene, and health. He is concerned with the interior design of our homes, as much as, if not more than, the exterior.” *8 As is evident from this passage, the civilizing mission of the architect was a theme especially relevant for residential architecture in the shaping of a new and modern culture of living—a subject I take up in the next chapter. It was also an important theme in designing model villages, “colonizing the countryside,” and teaching the peasants “how to sleep on beds, how to use chairs and tables,” as covered in chapter 3. In both areas, the quest for professional legitimacy and power was based on a technocratic worldview: it was the rationality of architects, planners, and experts that made them
legitimate authorities in prescribing lifestyles. The technocratic overtones of the Modern Movement were epitomized in Europe by the early career of Le Corbusier,
who was inspired by Taylorist principles of rationality and efficiency and appealed to industrialists, businessmen, and the state for the implementation of these ideas.*” Like the great master before them, Turkish architects repeatedly appealed to the state for commissions and tried to expand their involvement in nation building at every level, from the design of homes and public buildings to factories, silos, and cities. There was no doubt in the minds of Turkish architects that the state was the primary agent of modernization and the primary patron for their expertise, which alone could give built form to the ideals of the republic. They did not hesitate to legitimate the role of the professional architect as an officer of the Kemalist revolution and an agent of its civilizing mission to carry its ideals to the people. Modern architecture was perceived and portrayed as the natural expression of this progressive mission, a powerful instrument of “visible politics,” not unlike the way modernist colonial architecture and urbanism were perceived by French and Italian authorities in North Africa at about the same time. For many Turkish modernizers (bureaucrats, planners, architects), words such as “colonization” and “fascism” had unequivocally positive and progressive connotations in the 1930s. They signified the authoritative but enlightened modernization of peoples and lands by strong states. The assumption was that only through the sponsorship of a strong state could modern architecture flourish in a war-
torn, poor, and backward country like Turkey in the 1930s.
In their quest for broader professional legitimacy and state commissions, Turkish architects competed primarily against their foreign colleagues and teachers. For the most part, they were faced with the paradox of respecting these prominent foreigners, who had introduced the New Architecture to the country, and at the same time feeling blocked by them from access to important public commissions. One consequence of this paradox was that while constructing their argument for professional legitimacy around scientific criteria (education, expertise, rational thinking), Turkish architects also resorted to the extrascientific factor of nationality, which gave them an edge over their foreign competitors. It was claimed that young Turkish architects “who were born and raised in the Kemalist inkilap, living it and loving it,” as Aptullah Ziya put it,*” would be better equipped to give form to the spirit of the revolution. During
The Making of a Modernist Profession .» 175 = ————
the construction of new Ankara in the early 1930s, Arif Hikmet Koyuno$lu, the leading architect of the National Architecture Renaissance in republican Ankara, was reprimanded by RPP leaders for writing an article that criticized the commissioning of the entire government complex to the Austrian architect Clemenz Holzmeister. In the article Arif Hikmet had written: “The new Ankara should be built by Turkish artists who know the heroic spirit of the War of Independence. Only Turkish architects can give this city its identity. Architect Holzmeister is a great man and a talented artist. But he is not someone to understand the revolution in our country in order to produce the works worthy of it.” *! The traditional tendency of Turkish political leaders to prefer foreign architects and planners was a primary grievance of the professional discourse published in the pages of Mimar and Arkitekt. In another essay, titled “Nationalism in Art,” Aptullah Ziya outlined the decline of Turkish art and architecture since the reign of Sultan Abdulaziz in the hands of foreign architects, including the most recent infatuation with foreign experts in the construction of republican Ankara: Nationalist art is not the work of individuals. It is the work of nations. No national art can be born out of individual talent. From the constitutional period (mesrutiyet), we leaped into the republic, thanks to the power of the Gazi. We needed a new art. Yet the new equivalents of Celebi Mehmet Efendi [an eighteenth-century Ottoman ambassador to Paris who brought in French artistic and architectural influences] still carry the same old mentality and still have the last word in matters of art. Once again they brought foreigners who, instead of baroque and empire styles, this time introduced the New Art. However, since [these foreigners] also tried to look “a little native,” their work turned out to be a strange thing, far from reflecting our revolution. These new experts turned out to be no different from the Toma kalfa [alluding to Ottoman minority architects] who built Pera in Istanbul, and with their heavy and bulky hands, they shaped the construction of Ankara. We do not want to give the impression that we are negating their rightful role as teachers. We are not talking about art, but “national art.”
There are two interesting points in Aptullah Ziya’s arguments. The first, also repeated by other Turkish architects, is an acknowledgment of the pedagogical function of the foreign architects in introducing the New Architecture to the country. More interesting is the implication that their modern work was less “revolutionary” than befit the Kemalist ideal. In other words, it was not modern architecture that Turkish architects objected to but the particular modernism of the German-speaking architects. With his admiration for Italian rationalist architects, Aptullah Ziya was particularly vocal in criticizing the heavier modernism of Ankara and casting this in terms of a nationalistic argument to promote the professional power struggle of Turkish architects. Similar sentiments, sometimes bordering on xenophobia, were not uncommon in the generally introverted, nationalistic culture of the early republic.
Making the professional plea for the benefits of a system of competitions that would favor Turkish architects over foreigners, Zeki Sayar, too, cited examples from Italy, where “designers not registered in the Fascist organization of architects were not
————— 176 ~. The Making of a Modernist Profession
allowed to participate in national competitions for state buildings.” In their paradigmatic essay “The Architecture of the Turkish Revolution,” Behcet Sabri and Bedrettin Hamdi also offered a good example of this nationalistic argument, which was at odds with the earlier universalistic and supranational claims of scientific reasoning: We need to learn from the techniques of European experts. However, the spirit and outlook of the Turk is higher than what they can attain. We must turn to the young generation of Turkish architects who, bearing the blood and talent of the Great Sinan, are now walking along a contemporary and logical path. The leaders who wrote nationalism and populism into the principles of the republic must commission the architects of the revolution from which a modern and national architecture will be born [my emphasis].
The weakness of the logic in most of these arguments is obvious. What relevance
could “the blood of the Great Sinan” possibly have for modern architects who, by their own claims, followed “a contemporary and logical path”? If indeed “modern needs [were] the same for everybody in the modern world,” as Behcet Unsal said, paraphrasing Walter Gropius, Hennes Meyer, and other proponents of the Neue Sachlichkeit before him, why would the nationality of the architect matter at all? Many such questions remained unresolved in Turkish architects’ professional discourse in the 1930s, with no clear and fixed conceptual boundary for the determinants of modern form. Sometimes modern architecture was discussed as a logical fact deter-
mined by function, technique, and the universal needs of modern life. Sometimes priority was placed on national expression. Often, republican architects wanted it both ways.
Aesthetic Discourse of the New Architecture It wAs NOT arbitrary choice or pure semantics that from the very start, Turkish architects insisted on the term “New Architecture” and expressed their distaste for the term “international style.” It would be misleading, they argued, to char-
acterize the New Architecture as international. It was simply an anti-academic
architecture and, being the most rational response to site, program, climate, and context, was by definition “national.” Nor was it a new style. On the contrary, its entire
premise was a rejection of stylistic approaches such as the Ottoman revivalist
National Architecture Renaissance before it. Moreover, in spite of occasional statements reminiscent of Neue Sachlichkeit clichés about architecture’s being an antiaesthetic and scientific fact, the radicalism and internationalist spirit of the “new objectivity” was as unpalatable to Turkish architects as the term “international style.” There could be many explanations for this. As already mentioned, the European architects teaching and working in Turkey were more conservative Germans and Austrians, outside the mainstream Bauhaus and CIAM circles, often with a classical
The Making of a Modernist Profession »- 177.) —————
training informing their austere modernism. Equally important was that the socialist and Marxist views upheld by the radical German architects of the Neue Sachlichkeit and the “internationalism” of the left were anathema to the strongly antisocialist, antimaterialist, and nationalist ideological precepts of Kemalism. The prospect of reducing architecture to pure scientific calculation and cold reason meant negating not only aesthetics and taste but also the “national spirit and idealism” that were so dear to republican architects. Finally, it was the aesthetic component of their disci-
pline that legitimated architects as “artists’—-as experts in aesthetic matters that could be handled by no one else. Whatever the reasons, Turkish architects’ emphasis on functionalism, rationalism, and scientific expertise and their rejection of stylistic references to modernism did not go so far as negating their preoccupation with form and aesthetics. Rather, they elaborated the remarkably insightful, albeit polemical, formulation that “if a work of architecture fully conforms to its context and its function, then it is beautiful.”*5 In other words, they proposed that in the New Architecture, modern form was not really formalism—that is, the geometric masses and volumes of the New Architecture were not a stylistic given but a consequence of rational considerations of the problem at hand. Reminiscent of Le Corbusier’s famous statement that “modern decorative art is not decorated,”* this formulation allowed the profession to reject the aesthetics of Ottoman revivalism without rejecting the importance of aesthetic concerns. It meant taking artistic creativity on board while leaving stylistic ornamentation out, thus defining the modern architect as distinct from the old “draftsmen and decorators,” as Arseven had called them, while still maintaining a creative, artistic edge over engineers as a competing professional group. That the term “building art” (yap: sanatt) was widely used in the 1930s interchangeably with “architecture” is indicative of this desire to legitimate the architect as both a construction expert and a creative artist at the same time. To be sure, such binary oppositions between construction and art, science and aesthetics, logic and feeling were themselves modern constructs, and as modern philosophers have contemplated extensively, it was only after the modern separation of these realms that efforts to recombine them had intensified. In an important piece titled “Feelings and Logic in Architecture,” Sami Macaroélu criticized misrepresentations of the New Architecture as pure logic devoid of feeling—as, for example, in terms then circulating such as “logical windows” and “logical plans.” He argued that with the overwhelming domination of social life in the modern world by logical and rational rules,
art was the only domain in which feelings could run free, and everyone should acknowledge the value of that:
Recently we have been repeating the same clichés: “I did this because it is rational. This is the form necessitated by construction. This will respond to such-and-such a need.” Enough! These logical explanations have no other function than masking the feelings that we refuse to confess even to ourselves. Why not say, “I did it because it is beautiful or because I wanted to express
—————— 178 . The Making of a Modernist Profession a certain feeling”? In New Architecture, the building must conform to its function. But is the scientific aspect of architecture enough? No. We are always guided by our feelings. If we think about our decisions, we will see that even in those decisions that we consider the most “logical,” the role of logic has been no more than that of reinforcing our feelings. How many people are ready to admit this? You must have heard of people talking about the New Architecture in such terms: economical, healthy, rationally constructed—in other words, “logical.” An ordinary technician equipped with science can easily make buildings with these qualifications. | Reason can take care of all of them. Are we going to call the resulting machine “a work of
art”?*” ,
This emphasis on the importance of extrascientific factors in design was, in
essence, the basis of an undogmatic approach to modernism that both Ernst Egli and Bruno Taut tried to impart to their students at the academy. On the basis of his own method of working out a design problem, Taut explained in his book: “First you come up with a logical diagram in response to site, orientation, landscape, and other such factors. This is truly a diagram: a scientific document, which has nothing to do yet __ with architecture. It is important to wait until this diagram acquires life and thinking gives way to feeling. Only then is the hand set free to draw.” Although the student
projects for the Directorate of State Monopolies housing mentioned earlier (see fig.
4.4) show no evidence of having gone much beyond the first, diagrammatic stage, it was important for Taut to restore to building construction the artistic component that _ had been obscured by the anti-aesthetic excesses of the Neue Sachlichkeit. That he
published these ideas in Turkish was a particularly important contribution to the
been appreciated.” oo
architectural culture of the early republic, the significance of which has only recently As early as 1929, in his important book Modern Architecture, Taut had been crit-
ical of the tendency to fetishize stripped-down technique and function and had , objected to the reduction of modern rational design to “a stylistic zeitgeist,” as he called the canonic ocean-liner aesthetic of Le Corbusier. The writings and work of
Turkish architects in the 1930s suggest that they had internalized much more of Taut’s teaching than they typically acknowledged. In spite of their “functionalist and rationalist” arguments, which fared well with Kemalist positivism, aesthetics had a strong
presence in the discourse of the Turkish architects gathered around Mimar. They were, however, quite insightfully aware that the best definition of a modernist aesthetic was that it could not be defined beyond generalities such as “geometric,” “abstract,” and “undecorated.” Unlike classical styles, which could be codified into
fixed orders and motifs, a modernist aesthetic was one that you knew only when you ,
saw it. In 1933, Behcet Sabri and Bedrettin Hamdi’s words captured this basic premise of modernism, connecting it, however, to a larger zeitgeist argument: “Souls have changed, life has changed, and a new era has dawned. This new spirit has left the old repertoire of columns, arches, capitals, pedestals, and entablatures behind and has thrust itself into the world of masses and volumes. The architecture of today, which
The Making of a Modernist Profession - 179 ———— we call ‘modern,’ is a harmonious totality of simple, beautiful, geometric shapes dis-
sociated from traditional motifs.” Herein lies the ambiguity of the aesthetic discourse of New Architecture in the
Turkish architectural culture of the 1930s. As was emphasized on every occasion, it was
supposed to be an aesthetic arising out of rational considerations (of site, program, construction, materials, climate, context, etc.) rather than predetermined stylistic choices. This simply meant that modern architecture was formally indeterminate, irreducible to any a priori form. This was a very insightful position for the 1930s. As
architectural historians who have deconstructed the “myths of the Modern
Movement” or the “fictions of function” in European modernism have shown in
recent years, rational considerations of function and technique are always inadequate as determinants of form.*! So how is one to account for the “harmonious composition of simple geometric shapes” or the pervasiveness of “the cantilevers, the rounded corners, the circular windows”? An answer that can be tentatively proposed is that there was a certain aesthetic repertoire of modernism in the 1930s that circulated in architectural culture at large and informed the work of Turkish architects as well. Despite their insistence on talking about buildings in strictly technical and functional terms when they wrote in Mimar, they could not explain the recurrent aesthetic features so common to the work of the 1930s in those terms alone. This does not mean that wherever these aesthetic features were employed, the designs were not functional or technically sound. It simply means that there is always a margin of indeterminacy between aesthetics and functionalist-rationalist explanations of form. In its eagerness to lend credibility and authority to the New Architecture, the discourse of the 1930s rarely, if ever, addressed that margin. Let us look at a few of these aesthetic choices. A most immediately recognizable one was a particular composition that combined a long horizontal block or group of horizontal blocks with a prominent vertical element, a clock tower or a chimney. Rounding one or both ends of the horizontal block was an additional feature that enhanced the perceived modernity of the building, perhaps with distant allusions to a ship or ocean liner. Three important and extensively published buildings of the 1930s
in Ankara illustrate this particular aesthetic at its most refined expression: the
Exhibition Hall (1933), the filter station (su stizgeci) of Cubuk Dam (1936), and the casino-restaurant of the new railway station (1937) (fig. 4.6). Three buildings with vastly different functions shared a common aesthetic idiom that made them distinctly “republican” in their iconography. Possible sources of this aesthetic idiom were the numerous contemporary European buildings reproduced in publications, as well as architects’ “intertextual” references to each other’s recent work. These forms would not have been so successfully imported and circulated, however, if it had not been for their connotations of progress, modernity, and industry (especially through allusions to ships, factory chimneys, and undecorated machine forms) so cherished by republican ideology. Whatever the specific ideas and images in the minds of their
rnist PProfessi INS of a Modernist RAS pots ek gion Lbee etiay Notte ig et fon aeraroreetale ats Mere
PEER: AROS EO RIS TN esPEN stice 3 At 3ed9aesntes 3eee, éheoSae tase Ben teapei ed | aers Wet geee. EF SEs SPAS BPG ERIE OR A Tsenice acs 3 Oe aeANE SUE ap eetdeee ees ghee EEE Vet ee ee sighs hao: en eet see mg $a. fi BE she Ne iclesNEO Digi eeSOE Bo et the ras eRe ie, PE POO OE ETE ee
ey Pa arene eae é: ica eeeoeReine eet eh ie ag es Senet, aeoe ticeEieee oe GPa ree oes sparen Se: seme es | LO ik Siersate Shae oS sea Ripe ies, Op eeifpor pitaetreSa3ani Sepome gedeeMa Oe aeg ee eA.
“pedtnee Seaeagt Ee nea pa is Te Sees ieCSE Bana Ra ohn hep eMeeee ae SeeereeeBe Tips Adtao witsgk eer eget Ae ae Pen reese NF ake eer eB eeeet Bet eye tad ee Bae: Re ote ee PO See aa ce oe SA et yi ear eeeteet eae Vier ee econ LE ERR ter a eare Be Rica aeagee, sore eearao eee iain) SiR beEe i Gaputist SS ee taesee - Me ee Be ee eect Ss agSenta SORES oh eee eae ee st ieeee 1 eee hid ss Bra ees Oe, Ee NAT Ms Fe ee eee nS
pasta cet mcrae set Soke redete aa pease Gee) ee Sseeeeeoe gl ee gee Road EEzee icnie eos ty ee eee Uees here tg Geepee Spt aetye eeweb Tee wee OR ow Pe ee peeFe tee gees Bette ah SR Gh ee aa ae 7 Sennen A Pee cileg Bae Rea edeam tae gs oeGoi | eres Brena eoweseae eS Roe as Bi fe eo bay osCane meet Wo chy ROS REO Ces EL RNG CaeoseoS ae ee ame AW yay Spots tx eet fics ran a iemas eRe eeeete a eee Bete a hGif fede Ponte esotorner pe:eeUPI eere ieee 2 Go ee ne aee PEE, eypee ieee eeeaLe See Pheos» Ras vised BECRN tee ton aSosRnb eeBPS Sept DIN Pare cid gig bes oeoeee Bi EE eeee PE eesaeEe MN PTR Ue ro Sra oa Rs ee Pi org Piet tte 2 og Mg Gh eh ates pT fe eek es bs age tineag he fe OR ag CI Ie Ce ek i, aE BT ee BS eee hie aurea ae s
i ators vee ees iat ee, eae eae hig Sica i: eee ee tie = ne Fee ee 2 oo
5Seige OORT Ee Sntk steak re cote tisBeng ace or ed aeepeebeoeeSeg eeSigg Beetey Vide Petre CARTNS REE Reaia tire tener isPOS Bae 5 Bertin. Se Feee ee ee eaeemer pi enPek taeTbe oe Poi eh Races seve eee, 1 eee he eee Cte eS%eeCeeei ae
Net Thee Ae Aee eee ie ig a Fe ore 1 Raped reese. SE et ee eee eC oe a es ist BMY Ly ts Seen dowt sae DN a ae BRN ahha to he he i: BRR ee ee yes 1 er ae Tee Oe tel)
EPL os Le Reewear £53 ae 5 tlatsdpee 4 Ee| Rt ea EE Be Eat ereeedpes oe oe a ameneaeosa is ge hyEArt DeeWie. ehoAEE il ete Agee oo:eae SeSO oeWee a eePe ; Fae Benet viet Siac eta eee BR ee Pepe ee aie spe: SE ee eo aac bt pee re ; Bos od he AG | eee oe
Aisyceacite 2Been he ote, eo scien a tay ee ee B* ore ee koae inn a bie ae ’ - Ae PRS a 1) teenth eeeete ese sod *Me Hg Beye eee er eeee 3 ee Soee eas OEE s :oeedie ROS elses ae oe ; Bee me isep SEN
ee ees: iRo eee? » : he i ReFAP. ie qoeoePe a ee ee oe— eeoeere oie acath : Ce ee ee ee eiatets TELE ae oe ee Lh Seren, bkyee : ; ciinom: PactsTe ee ce -— ee
aid .Eeae ri a eee a : Se ee er fee 5 rae ; abet. ri: Aalto Bee st oe i See > ie im ys a aa ae Be PeaN Seek Sr 7 hep eee ea gn acts ee aa ae ‘ _— eR Nn a Pa pears aS ee eg ee Beet as Se Seon EEE ee ee SI EY BeBe oe Bee oe Sees
ee 426h0 208 Ere} Pei hey edd Se mF ge SCE: FS ee a ee =r
soya ieee 2"! 89 Eee it eee ee a ne . ae oe Satan e aone 4 ~eB i PBs oa +Re;: ,+rmagtannteel Ce eeOs) a es ee $4 »eat ae gh seep *ead iTees ot ct att j -34ces .|), ‘4 a,‘©ee wepe asgle: eee so Gk Perit fe on pe Aes aeit . :ie aeene ie es BT weeget ee ee Pi fee Lettpment arere es -1oe eee Peieiees .
as 1ke ete PEN das piri 4 Pyhae iat fe ‘Bi eeeak Cae / é+e * .. 5 CAG) eee gay? BB Bs thiell BY Wer edie hea ot pee 5Re } Bk os %: Fare a Fone nkesubg tieon. +. * _llOm aecx pe Se%te BYJi fe
.2Se —saerope iret ae: aAy Mpee tind tite Ley et hhHi i ea a See ie ttin Wamt Bane SUIeo Hos wr: le ooteeeeot-*i ies + *anTe eetek ys| os Ee Ce ee ase Bi vos j 4 5 eee ee 5 joo pe eee ee =oct AY%j
FS maers pe;ee $8eer }>pC 41?od + 295 . Poe SRpas ee de> Ay, EITaplasia fot aus acne aoe Pie,~~ mm hae iA - ect antimemamee’ a= cy i ;-2ee ereT Tro A ee RP ’as.croa th.To PPFa eo grey en
ET oeSeasny: SeIeesgree ee - “illo |x{2 2
Bering 3Pep sae daerrno cm sat, Eos haee pe ‘gigs pese Ra hien ee eT :(ee of MiLO et BRS *araSe hee esieeee ipspce 8‘ me on tage. oN itis ca io eeAE SpigleSpee te ah OEE ne a £ae cert re aia ~ ‘ae aw
:
| ie : P ‘ :ueee :: S
pe BSaeEEE Be ara ee Bi ate4eee Ans Ge| Fees om aePsis PRE a REE pe ee SG ee NP AA aeoAae aicSe a. a iain eerie care A ee: seeS eceee cPaen gh Pe aeePindar ee. eee
Ei4 Cito ‘a tif4 oma:Ge.. meee RTaeAy ee ee eee ‘Wee a. Fee 2... 2. oe, s.. . -pen We, ; ees PeFeaesoe eeePana eee te LEAeaeeeeR eS gs a aSion z Penns Ee fis Be. Be Sey RSop ’|
“ogi ot . : Eelwt, wee Py Toye -Sot BalaagWareCmce3 -Phe Deedee ga pred tyiey Ages .ooph ABS SS "it Peesa asf Pia es a Pree .a gor oliy§ aThetha pore : aL ie: Bey: ee Eee eS Semone si ee horw 4d - eRe ws. :. ?See MEP a eee a Tepe REESeg * ahs2Ret SOA ot eR be ees ge: conse Be 3queue Se a ttPeleg pee CRs Sage 2 5 Seen
uel oe 2 elise VEC - Pees eos Sts eee LPL eee oBos oe Piaseepeeer E52eSSore RE iteBS ee SS fears Gee igee Se FieeeesSrae en er er ee Seac SSvkEY 5 oe hoe ghFao rt Pa ; fpe 2S" ae eeGg FOP LS iesEe peeLal fahy OD Sours oRets OFSele aeLP 3$eSe ae?ee FAS SSE EA Beepeepee: COMMER’ BR Yas ae Sitete egPs Seca , ES ees Sat wens Beste 0>et eee Segoe eswet2eX ee ByMiB Sey EER Bes Dap oe, Be SSSED Eeee 2 6SRG. UE. Bee PeCAIR Cae
baere aee ee© aerate ES CG ESEDEN ‘eer ERSTE poe TS eee ge s, MAE ee)Ie Sree Date SES --Zee : oe ¢ est Poee ere ray Fig Oo Gu aN SOLIS CLOT ee ASie oy fs Saal fy ti;ce Go agge Bee ea ee ee Rata Pa apeaiesee>os ee ee Eee CRO IEE OE :Pore
Binh SCS Se eS a Re ee ee RR S| sini 8 | : . - re note ce Cae PD ota: boc a OB SEG ATE LT ee ee eee = as fe ss Sar eee Brent : i ricer aS aoe ee cee re fe E
WUE Ee Teva ane EE teeoefine ae lalaeotEEReAEN Boise ROPE ELS slg WIE ft aete! mene oe CORB SeoRPEs RESete IR oe at SH freotites REC ReetReggie neaME a EAD sue ee nrg dates! reread ERfei eaefife gee cb SUEDE SessSauna ea Ma ORT ir. Fa °Teatro Z B 5 >Pa SARS ESEEe pc SEE Etna SSeS Peay eet foot eet Seed ick ECE RE Se try MES Se edPRE Heageiit ieee Serer Me
REE a ee Se Se ee nate ed vnran SeEcrc TEAS cgi be afteSe rear terse TP Sania. TE niefaBat Ge ee ES saa?BR s sonssOe pAb i 2 : ESSE DE Sng SEE RBS erie ee 2eee aE BS Hobe SLURS EUS L SER cae Metis eran eters Bicrcnrces Ser e sere eer Sn ck RS 2!ge Tessa) dieo Sho Sga ete es tei SSCRE Steete a2 Hee OTTER” ELaE USES ee ae et pies RA TEERoe Es HOSES ES es See pee eeroe eaesites eee tn: ee ee MRE Suid Pa ak ficy Egat, a IG Ne cco ag Aa Ce See eeiedea aula te BU hersog og eo enSih Aes MRSPoiia one Sssh ee dca ee eee Ereee hg Sager i oa ee ecanme ceeeae ree ine nea erties Fala AL eg rueee ta eeBe eeeceee (fee plea| Si BOE eee Sgr BRS Sig ss peraSe ieafeeret ay nee ange he cee ee ee role
eeSe eSEeS ek Re eee e.,rtCti pi? a oe Hegoi & 3 Se tere ey tLe gt sh Ze WES Ps it a weet oe 2. bee ee ee ee mec esd og : : & See fut > = : > £2 .85- j j TELE EA ee eee to we ee ae os #i g 4a3; -
.7. :cd .- . e
2 vine pied RRR Seen> ee Peet Ble weeny 7ES Sitaram: Wegtk a ae he ae . ES te ee OES FSde nee, TFSTOPES BR ee pine Saeed eee- es ae £Etkinumecse BE ESSE bdsy. . i me fos coe . Wee ses WSs tgie Leg cg4ons stem ee ier DEEDS ee weft oo : F ; . yp EE Bee ee. SO imal ere eet ee ae ; Segeihcewis Ese REPS BRS SRe SasereAr een ee eeioe
| epbetie eR Le SE Re ©as ere ~ eeee eeangeee eePPSee De a Per PePE ne aneeeeeenass ~ tege RES ET BiaE le Seseee a SeNe eaee as ee ee aere ee a :
| : - 7 oe Si n ae : Bere ne re ene a OPE OES, GRE RR ee Ee ea Se Se Sg core . ;
|:® ,; :. -.-_. /.;."aoe*: .«.t;|. |
. ° *]-7e ,Fig. , 4.8. I ler ra’s major public ig. Th4.8. called Ankara cubic or Viennese cubic stybuildings €onn NKaras JO c 7Q.e ). ,; The so-cal Ubic | blic p 9 -19 m ister. Bottom: Court Appeals Top: Officers’ Club (1929-1 33)ofy Financial Clemenz Hoizmeister. :| ;28-1 _ , by., oro} f lzmeister and the cubic win-by Ernst Egli. 1 I ) H .
°
Egli. The inverted ° -shape rojections o OIZMme
dow projections of Egli were distinct leitmotifs o IS style.
.-.
a
The Making of a Modernist Profession - 183 —————
architects, these buildings clearly embodied richer references and associations than mere responses to the programmatic requirements of exhibition space, water filtration, and public entertainment, respectively. If the initial sources of some of these aesthetic choices were European, their particular interpretation and repeated use in a particular city or for a particular program suggest that certain formal vocabularies circulated among architects within Turkey as well. For example, a very specific way of entering a building through a rounded corner into a circular space appears to have been a recurring approach for buildings housing official RPP functions and located on corner lots, even with different scales, sites,
and constructional constraints. The Yalova RPP Headquarters and People’s House (1934) by Sedad Cetintas and the winning entry for the Sivas RPP Headquarters and People’s House competition (1939) by Emin Necip Uzman and Nazif Asal shared this particular formal arrangement in spite of their very different sizes, locations, and budgets (see fig. 2.25). Similarly, the rounded corner entrance of the Agricultural School (Ziraat Mektebi) in Izmir (1932), designed by the office of the Ministry of Agriculture, was repeated in almost identical fashion in the Gazi Elementary School (Gazi Ik Mektebi) in the same city (1934) by Necmeddin Emre (fig. 4.7).°
ee ee 2D Soe ee ee ee Ne
Pie nn eee ee ee ee me we SM aa ee ew ee to rer hoe ee eee eee
ree I, ee ee ee a 2 ee ee er ee oe ee ee ere
a me, re Biotest oad a is Ay ae ee ° BEN oe tte ee ete at a dang de Vn eee Bee ae ; fee oe as i
| ol Peas -| "nie | aso} - ; ee ieee Fig. 4.9. Influence of the “Ankara cubic” on Turkish architects: the Directorate of State Monopolies administration building (1935) in Konya, by Tahir Tug, employing Holzmeister’s inverted T projec-
tions. Tahir Tug designed for the directorate in other cities as well, employing the same style, as in the case of his State Monopolies administration building in Antalya (1934) with Egli’s cubic window projections.
ki of aMaking Modernist Professio 184 ~. The 3 e
.
2 ee eee ee ee eee Reece eee ee EGU RLD ET ah SS es hh ip SURE ng ERNE igh es gene! Se a GREE 8 Hee eo a op gw Te er CEES He eeeees Re er ee .eee :~ ne pe Bee SS tteee Tee dina tecng Fpepen ae eeue ee ee ee ee Ree ae ee \-Sage a ae ee ee Go eee Pe p88 ores et eeochee esERsassis aaa ee ee ee ee ee eee oe ee 2Skoe etspoe See eR ee USE a oie TE eree ed Ug Tuer ano ie Se eS a es enee tear (aes MAS Pein, ieee Nauk ost. eee et Tv ~ Eat ie ca ie Hiab RE Ses See rere ren ne SPORE gen ian Ban Benn : : oer ee oo .
ee Goel sus. Ls LOE ee Se oe Bs PUad Bee We mitmamteeii en BEA ee SEs ey nee -|eeSeZ ee Sree ue poe ee Bes Se oeSemen eee: oeaie,aaeeeeee eeDee oe) eee pemaeeegy, eeeee eI =ee eee a eee6ren er es (al (ocak
Se oe oe eee
—_ eo Se fe Seeger Lae... ee De OPEL LS ee . ; eee sel rs SASS See eee eeeee>Been ee ere er SRLS ee i : “~
Ee a ee oe Eee Se ke eee ee seas iea EOL REPORTED bs 7re . : saeecmrmeaetness = ee erSoares ea SCRE eet ed i ne -Se eae pacer rer _ Se ee a eee os eae Te Suse elas SR ate EE + ee ~ . pee e, Se Be Bee is BENae a ee Cg ee. ;a aad Pakoy aw i: Mee eseeoes ee, asPee) Teer ~et. we ‘yen*.hs ‘ .asMe & C2 oe ee Lee 3 epee sO oe co * oe See Tah? Po “yeaor . %- i Me pSSe‘e eeARS) se geEeBere ++eS 7aleee SE ee aio reone er eeeRE kes EZ eS FE FE reek Es eeBees oea.ee 3oswo no Be :fe ‘ :eae an tSO ee] ere ae .°ares
- eae eee Bake ee. Gea iu rey oe hues oa een e pee ee,-S ce :eR ee eee opseee Ss _> }L oeSees = ieetee SEmea ne eee prereerrprane” "mM Ay : ~ oe
iia ae eee |
. . wo OS SER lS ue ina FS Pah mcenR Le HRM cid os iysion Sree ae: a
a SL a * i te : ar Poly Vlped pie Th fo BBL, ei nien lb ee Ee fee ee ee ee ao
ey osLas : : To .LEGS oy Shreel SBBeees oeEsses ADees a taSee Soo anee rE eee iPrdiASMe oEiges oe fon.gett Bo ooBe . ~.- a: Tole : = oe ood 23 pe Oi, itntiHe ee os eeeeeon
on :ts- i.oe. .wet woe esisee B Besse... ea seg ue oy re 5 ee - neeee Ae eeeae a es eh Ee BiOatap wee oR a “opts ieclatBRE a ee Tass eei Pe —nelll “
2 a ten : an :eo -. RE SicaiaeEk: ees % ia = Bane —_— . aI aaa, sone ce) ee er rm ae .aioe as noe .woe = > - sees ors eata4 peer -ae ok 2z:ce m To Lee ne Pgs a va. 46 >i2: ,. :.2... : : 73 . ae ag . . | ia eg .eg we “ao, pn ita Se fea oad iPiette sorcin sntinie cs = + : a. | : mee Cae ; Ein, > = as z .
_ aie ier: i rN : fotliboslinyes ee Be eo. |7a.helt ae = eget ~ AFL i H s yoy, ed] ne f..., _ . : i £ ‘ Pik Sigg wan nc tere yee : oer.scarasenti «e eae wig Ft eae He eS i~_Po B 4\ i: .. eee SC"
pages ba, fF kearie : vid . Ee Ess oo Ta + :EE Soa | ere: Be :.a. mo. . a ar ame _— ——_ | . a ; fe ///f ai a] foes , , 8 a senate ‘ feo Mexemior oe ao a . | j a aD‘Me seers ATE ag 2 ie ce ile, ESE ua a sp. beMe Bree. BeworegS a ii alia aHOTLINE is OT eeSie ae | ar : 7oesci |, ), | ,;,Be:poser : ES” PR reas ;. . ee ge RestaMGT” Aare ea i aaEe OO PO ie ene eee ee eeNBS ee Bonen et = RE os eae Secreta a _eg, By : }fF. ; - | —oa aes fsee a || —ee ng aHSE ones Se eee? . oe ajancsceaantnee Se eer ate LEE CST Cone price. vn HORE ; Seger Sons, : i”
: a ae “a es = ie mee Tee ORE RENEE Be ge Berge eS een aoa
eee , Page ee ee Se eat or e.. Ee ee
Sse aeee eePe See eeee 8rebee es “eee Wares ic : Oeee ee ee ee oe re SSeS EG Ronee Aeee oo aeSER SS eeeS ie ae ene oy Oe {Bee see EE BCE eee . eae eeee ee ee ee ee et yp Pia pte “Re . oo __B.S a pu ae Po ae oe oS a SE oe Be Os ERE pe ae ee ages ae JES EEE eae gcceerrs | phe oeoe ese Tees se Ope ten a Ge Le uid Be Vag vie ite Sere egy 8 Bete RIES ares 8 ect? SSE i Sa pee eer ME a a be ORCS = ‘ae so - - _— BESS eran as airy eRe sn ete ROOT ESE Eee eRe RE A Re Ee, RECA ae Sree OSS ae es ed Gags OK iss. yee eee aa SERS asain SS ce aaa . eis Re ea bea MELEE eG ALLE SEE are ge eee EE BG OGS SE eS eee eee Bee OED eS ERE IS eee mire sient ee o> a ees a Se aEPetPEs Bae ee ee eee ee secs Menpe keene Caden cee a Rese eee aie agen we pies PAE Rs se Be es Ea vis Eee ae EPA SE
. ee PgR SraAR eee a UR Gil as, Caso eG Bete to® Ee Se Ee Be eS }Bo Nae aaa ges aie ee ie : : “a | PLES ge ie Speier ame Was iaSoe4 coer Pelee see Ee, Re alaeieS: yae Sees . PSP Ee. ee ES eESe ee ee ce Soresee See SER SEN ESSeeTaee POE SS SUR en ee SH rs NES Boe RE oeswel A es eedeebana Be ;oobrae Le a Co a oe Geen ae eeenee aan ieee See ee eagles ey Rie eee eeee OA eee Rie tamieo ONT Ee TNS ar Soe SESee eeout Gi pe ay aeCee se bE iekeCS Le SUMARIO SE eee ne eet nee ereSorte et eeFeee ets: eae eae ESET SOE eee Spel aise eee,eS GusSpE er av ing Reese Taek ogres atihe SeesDai ee Seatac Beesve 2a ietSESE gee bee a.4| eS rs .
.
ee fe ee ee aB eesighae :eeeeeBe oe See SS ESS SA Seeee eepipsee a See eSesBs ee co eeBee &4Rae gfae oo :| -Ce eo-Boe ree ee punme eee (Gee os aeessoegies (eo ere hap EeBe ee Bee ede pias SES ES es RSE on ayfhe Big ee ee ee oe SES BE eerste Serie... EP? rESG a+Le series %gePE : tpgee tonee 38oA Seo =Ras ateAae oaeoe teees a oe reper ees Sgt eS ie aE Se EEE 2 ELSE ee Lae Jog | Bee ge eee Reon gia Sse VER EN essere Bob Eee ele ee Re : ene tie eee ee, een edeee Sop oe RG aeSeee Zee SN ee ; : |ee! Bae MEGS Se hesASoop rete ELSE so ogty Be ee eal PTA RetRay Ege aey 4 “y—_— , | -|eS: ee i Bees og E 8 Bees eee = beg a gs BEF oy ; ;:. ae: Sip WE ee ral a eee ee go Tee eee ea ee Beye ES Sey tl PEG oN eeeeee 7S BSS ag Sea Sa icar Dee. gh. i ; er See 2 AE Oe eee ef ON eee Nu aag+8ee ape geae) a E. 35° dee aeee eee eeSoe cn Pe ae Sis aS aweer SS ee, Eo Latent ereee ee ee Se tire reSey St Lars ne “o> “See pre eS BEG es AS ee Rasta SURES ee ee Ss SER eeareeiee ag FEE irsr iee Sa ee eta SE2OE RN eas ow x, ‘Se 3 Be etna - ‘ ae x . Bean eae AOS Oo ee ee Ee to ee tas por han tateearw se ot Spe Re Cees OR ee Me eae Sas Ta Rec" geo ESP. ~ oS a fe ee tae ees . SSE ee 28 (Se SEA RS ea Rie eyelet ae ogg? AERTS Sa eee 2 AE Se ee pe eee ee es ee the 4 a piss bie As sole ena ete
. - ee es is re : : .
- a 2asin. she ee ean ae aaa 3tate3aeRe » Seg eee es See Rigen ee Be s. ap ;| a oa Soe i. Tae 8 . -a-,ican ee Poe coe |cee ee ee ee EAletse, tARGS !teres Le ee ae gee ee ge SEL CR ne Cota FS a ee Rocke SEN | . * Reis ia Sh PITRE STO NO Tce Pee .oe a wes eee Ee eae ee Ss SRRELE ose “ere Es ERS oe! owe: . g =. a Ree se ED ies: as: ie RRR RES )aeeosOO ep A arn Bes seated : Bees Aee bed SSeS. — 1ce_yeas 2S SS m1 ooeg ee;:|.®; . .| | | en eal |S ee ef > ae Sao, Se ele j oe ee Re cas Aame ee ee: SE Ra ere ee. Y & Ee eh aSo eee i62 Gye Sei iegeeey SE ara , BE are pee ee ee eee eer oo OE ee Ot ree aan 4 se on Gee oe Benge oF Sa S|ee Sa aca oa Sin ee OO Nee OR cs a ee aan nn a ears. ene Aa _ “ Ae SEB a 2 i Pee pease jw a i | PT Linen anh me Ao, ss eee anETE) :end OseeSat pete EEE OS eos oa hlmee a 7m an RT . . : ee etLo Saher .‘Ron. Leet Toga7RT a>Aeae Seg a — ; ° . 0 Sea ie Be .. .é:BRS had wee Le! SEES. oF “mal pe ERS eee ee wo ae ie ee aE, ae —— ~wae ee . F2 #a ates CHORMRRE eanal _ we ee 3PeB fay Pris hEee thieBee Es eos at oP ce
Lo ee SO a ee :ee » -ee :™ :Mee Rags: a Pe Sper oe on Pe ~ Se : tgees ee . , -. thi "sep arn LoesES Ie2Bag aie sg ae eae an a oo; we oy : : isn :: id hon. —_ ee Pee 1SsO a me yeaei inp okae, ee Oe °°.” eneear%San ae 2%aeee ale,Fe Fa , ad oe ee an ce galealigeaiall aeo a geet ee aeae ee ee a ae eeoeAae: a Mig Seseuae aa ee Eases .Ok ages em igalSee +s gg Pe ee? a. % Yaase7Ce.See
i——Sc ee een 6 at aGli ON=page in cingabet BA sek . ae,
Ub ep aoeeeWE Te ae 2. edPia i eee eee ene eeshiee ee en, pA OO esgic de 3‘ raBER tat ti. :Oe pa Ps*, .SiR Phe .ee er Pe ee jam, fea oo eeesee Owe ea ke eeoeae Beas eat oes De ee ees eg ee on eae egy ee ee we eedem ie gate ana .eo : :ESE ap Bi Ge ss mes a RE oR_,SOE OEEtw OTerates 0. ea PRESS
eee
: : Be: eee Peso SY Fo RR Ree BBR ieee | $ ma
a aeee: ee“3aearns ff ee. euro ge See SES Meco: . Sg awe 2 ee Dove OR -Taeo : ceienema . ' J Be .: ae See ee RR I sere She et ae ee le aap a _ as : belo. & J rs soVis Pa pore oN, ee ae ;se ead uy foaBey, fee foué i= ; ;oe oe ge:oo Ba Pe. s[a+ ee 1M o i! | ae a ed wed nd ' \ moar 4 Ne ae oer ae
es{ce a— —sv ; on ; paroronnat mY peaYane ms ey 0929) tm ; “_ ee % pow sing 2 E 2ad4 eS foes os {we Tn: en PA 4pouuettiee sen pote iva \j Sag tiaSark saebee
: PD ip , oi . ae aoe t | sntnn rane. a|| Seat aa a a:‘crs a \ a niin Va Res 18
4 ee ff - ! smsgene i ; crttteesseh af Boose a Rage Fi ; rmacant “4 |ne poe 2 AS eet BS
hs vistid cnn i . aad coon . \ on oa . 4 Be reg Poe a a 2 Sa
es a ee oe a ee ee er a
e..:...: Fe IRE eee eeee SS 8a4 eS Se ee ee ee ee ee Bans Ce eeeee Re eeee eeeS ee eeBe eePe ee eree ee So aee ea — pe ee ee ee pee ee See iee ee eeee ee ee eg aeeee ek Be Fe ee See oe oe aeeSe - :Living M : Cubic m . - : ouses anHouses. artments
. oe eS eSeS ee Se 2 eS ee ee oene 2 8 =ee ae eeee ee a coe oe atoe 3ogeC nn ee eee es a ee ee ee we ea. a a ae Bie ge Le eee we ae a er, ee. r oe er eee : Ee[ee aeeee oe a Ee pe Ee es gee Peo ee ee Pees = aie po ea a ee ae Pe ee FG poe es = 2 Soe ee ep I _ Pe oi ogeaei ee ee ene ee ene ae a a se oe ea ae eee go ag gO age os nen ee Seg rt ee gE ES TE Bs Bee me a aS ROE EASES 5 YS eT ca SE = Se egg IRON 8 EE EES oS OS OT ee URE ere eet ee
Fee eee Ty SAL eS ee ER EET Re eR seve ee Sa ere pe ee ars ae eee OR Se ne eee ee Sr eee ee ee a ee ee eee ey SY Eee ae ae ae Se ce ae ea
ee ey a ee ee ee eee eee gee See Ss = aes pe eee eee i a ee ee ee fees eel ee Se a ee ee SE eee Sepa ee hee ee ee : EE BSS eeee eeEe Re ee eeeeee Seyh aeno eeSRee ee se a ee rod ESS ae SS eeea eeecate ie See SPSS esaeee acog re ines egBe ge ier ees aae eeae taeer ne... ok ee eee nee a em eer pe eeSee eeSSS Gt MOS es Sm eaere caeecSe toeseneSEE Sieieee RNnei eCSeAB ea SE ee SUC eo SUR PE RE ES RR SS Pen Soe SU, Fmt SUSE Se ee ee ie eee cin ee ee eer: ee eer eae eee, eee eens oten ROG eee enue cont Sor aes ere mae ete ais ee Ce Sh er ee 2 UGE eee ee ot “Aig a eere geoobs Re eRe eensee inst) eee SS ee ek, YS Teeth Sets EAS MRT een uate feesSa Seeeras cee erOSE Ete aeBE oe oeSe ERNE SEA ceeee ne ee ee 2SO aN eee VS REE ie Seeeine ee ebleeN SEED TE SaaS ge dete ee es UnsaeNoe eea ee eee ae Ee eaeeo eHae eee) SR SiS age eR gregS ash AgSee eTpSed eee ESreGS ee eee an asee
SAGE eeeaeee2a eeaE ee ee Oe SEN Ta ee SS tae ne te eae peeeee Eeee einer emREE etc oN ae eR cient ae coroners 1S aeeieiner eeTd REFP RYgee oat ere ee CL ce re MOE SESE Sg SS aS peeaeaaeaeRG mreSeSS a 2Sener SSR een SESE GEHee ee re ta Se a iNS: ae ee ee ee 3 pet ee ee aece eaCRT PR Eire phe eey UES eeeeTeee geea ee
ie He Gee ee ee oe See oe ee ee oc fee fo Garr oa weir ee nate Pa eens Bo ee ee gd a eee Bees Sues Nie ee
_SSIRE Ba Bg po a ect SOea eed eeeefeSeite Be ee aeeee_— a etre: eee mce a Liber a ee eeaie SS RE ge eiihet Von eee 2£oe Ppsiad = ESE ae ie Fae ee Pees eee eeEe es na es ence ceceee cee ere, aeoe ERe ries SRR VARESE Ee ge E: ane ee Seca, oe eer ora oeSEacne po es =Po FP ger Sa z 3 aS Se ee ae eae ee pee fe ee ee 2 Sig op ee cE ee eg areney See poe Pee e.a Renee ee ais TERY fai ebiee eegas oe free are ree ame) SeeeanBay ge Seihe a eeSeBeeeGee PS eae i e neanaice pee SUBaais nee see Pee SEAR I emer a eee Sri.) Ea penne aRENE ere or ee tee teeae dn TOPe tee eee big :°eeeee eaeRoe eee ee Bove s ee icici tigcieie cee eenBorys gee.” eaeee BUS eee ee es Cet See ee all EeaeSe eee| gaat Sc a pel Sieee i)ee gene) SLSaeeerr Ms eeperience ee eRe a ee od ee - oe poor eeSSR neeee 8ESPeCEO See i Rages? Seas tee eater ee crt emer ee ee en ro eee Le ee copisesoes ee ee ee i a ee ee sree Pee ade er ie ai ae er Nam
Se te ee ae ge ce Se ee Pe ee ee 2 PORRINS, Se uae ee ta Bee ee es See Sey fait vv ae ape eee eee See Beer ek oe ee ee ee ese em Eee cee see A Bee ee SOON see eat orc. baer Sees ee eae ete ne erate
4 SLR TE er ee wer SI ce Ee ere DoE Res hee SABE gj A Ree LE Behe ee ates ep ee ee ee ee eee amr ene as ee ee ee pane eau a
eesBS SESE OS Ay See ES Seea? ee ear eedSe ISDae eS gee be a BE eaeota See creas ee ee SSSR See eeme ae eeeine se ieee sa eu 4 ee Oe oe yeeDe ero oe See eer SiESacE akee ae SE eeSee de ee eeeee tee eee ee Ee re Per er eres Soiss eeCGRES ee ee =H, Se eine Regleee Ske Se Se aGece 2eeeoe Se SO aee Segeaaeete eePa ee ee Emerg arte fsnaice See RSE SU aceeseos - ipagE Ste a As eR ere eile pete ee eee ee cc ee ee re ee ee epee Shee ee, Sete eced AEE SARE Ss Soci oaoo UAE nea eeee eePSST cee ga 8 reTele ies gine Tigre SE Si Sgee OE SS eS ee ee eeeNc se ee tertae Sec Seaedtee aes Eee So AER Sige goemBadia ee SECA Said Se ee 2aree fo eee eeeee aceae” eet . Ree igen hs ee een tb Reig hae aed es oe eer es erg oso! reer eer ae Sa le eee ie tia 2eee Spat taeeS het ee aee ee teateala pert eaitiee ae nrae eG a ien NG et SeasSears eee Tee cea epee tae rennin cee ee er
: BySheeiS EasSSE eeBUS BSS Re eee Pee 3ee AS RD oe a the TENE: aNSNRec ne ee ame eeFiamma eeegeee ee ee ei tee pee eeea.so SE coer eerie Be ee ee ee aeHoag ee net Se ge ee ieee Cred aae Seeee eeSe anaee I a eee oS ndee ee Sk a EE eet Wa SS = apaee potas ai sere ee UME ge SESE US es fe ios mean ig eure cust apap mee:Be ee eee trae oe
esr a SOR Tue gehen ee eee PS SE tee ea BS ar ee nn Eee ee , ee eee oS Fe 5 ee eee Rea eS ee eeTaae oe ee a eeeS aa eerie ee Meer ieee ayeeeeSEM eer eg cesgsEee a Uy iia ee ree at re eee eeeyeeeeee pence et ae a ee ee So ee Oo Be a 2 gg ge re Bee Se ee ee Se ee ee eeOT ohigPeRul BeeaeRere SES el ee cee neee 2 Ere a es Se a ee cre cig ees Eaee ie ee Oeee ae i ee Pe ee ee : pe eeeeeeeeeg oe eeSoeae eeSUES ee ee es ee8ee Peey Ee: gee re aeeee aee aee 2aBagel ee ee -.eeee aeeee, ee ee 2cee ee eeBere eS ce Aa eeee er eee gle bag fue ag oSeee eek eeieeeea ee ee eee ee SE ee
Soe Re ELaera eee. Ee SARS TLS RD a owe OO ae arese secre et eeFS eepts ge=Een ag er eee CORA Sees ee 2S ee eeeeeeees See PL Sa eo: Se SSE Se Lee. 7.gee gee oo 2f.t.8 2el. erin GeeTELS * ; ga ie Fen oe geeSEM Schau tert Ma iene er Dh sears ie Corn eedeers Sey ENEaad . MHL IEGELR -Stra, SSG 2STe Sao Reeee eeGE oeEOS Saeee ee AE eal PC = eat. € es Aeen i ee soeaue Se Pear RERe TEE A EseeSee eeeSS meres
ee ee: ee ee eT
Ae| Tt =a2gare S =geen 3 Pe Sree PS PrSSIS eee eter nea Saal EI pele adSec;Eten eee OeaU ee eo Piss FBS eee eS Seretee iSeon Soa ESgei BaF BRR feet Sag eens EPRI ee he eee eon or eeeEEE eeeee Ea oe TEESeS Pee ie ps RE nH 2S:Lo 25a RSS a a “ zBea the } i Be aig Se aOR ae ee Ma A aig) SS De IMO Aoe eet eee icaae eo aus ceeeee
. Eegepep ek! SSE SV eee et he ea fei ee To Ria ss vane EEE LR ll ar i ae eee de 8: EEF be ie cre: BREE ES Re ek ee ee SG 8S A Seda oe Gee ein a ee SRA Seine ede ae Bs eee ater Mi eS oe SL Se bee ste : : FDCush RST ED SSR nb SR PE hpi tae eo oe ee ee ee BLS . a 4 a : : a aE kee OR ae i a ee aaor is aee ipsaieee oe SSP Reea ea
=a : pele ee = UMN ag ERE ES ee ed td = ae Ee ee ee ee ee igo gd : . Hees = ee pete Se. :ee ee yee ARETE 1agg peas . Dee aaecall ee STE eeioauge ES x otge ia oeee Pee > yo” pier gia aes SE ipa BEAT EE. Hy ‘te ee:spree ef SRR TEtee thie ere *Be five Zaps = soe re.esees Sake SL TES TE RE NS ge5-F Eb. ae, esot foe :ae &2 air "a Ae ed ee Be BRE as |pees Boe Be eeat aSST eeAEE SE a Sc Bee wey BES age Tbe, awatt SE Pee bh Bs. » Tnuayyen: nied: Ue sae ee idee ee eet tera] Tek” Karaktert) fey eetoes eG oo le :an
Pere kee dif etmediideri bis ev tpl ile katnlaeil ee
~ Hdsnda®yacudarees ss © bed pee See [ec my. Diliyetidir: “Sanat; | ME Nee ao baal. aA eee _
“yu ee ey PUG vemayulates cok] © | vucuda getirilen evlere «Kibio dol, i a | |
:“Spee Boar aeiss, eredenebr 2 api Hetil etmeyedan mechurdur. Ban bugtin'. fin’ bitin ve fennf-tekamillerint bin- | SUMNeeeneaeene aeaoeg «Renesan pin dereteds © kadar:istifade katettipim: doleyidirki mi:edit, ymnari; Resim, Musi] doinde tasivan: kant bin eserdemer ir, Re eae 6 ee -
| fama da) meee ee Be iyuyallecinizlah ctaber Hive Helkeluirasive ‘nevaran daha 7. gabit ye" . : ade ee ae ‘Bip eserdis ijmesitin ta, EE ——E——EEEEE IARI Gerais Gnteg ala) lus a suanik gi girtatyor, | { Bagtn otlymertli, ebPue; Kelimesinit a ee oe } (|Beheswiaeragad ee psinde. idealini bulmiip addedilebiir. Bu ya yinante harict ylelinde Biotk ve ufak mo eee eee read, is Bunn gorenler cert yalnis mitotane) armada ev-yapicdifi hususiinda cihanila mer Dtiflerden eber yoktur. Boyde hacimlarin iler
:- :;. "_ .7 Oe . 7-
o . _a : : . . *., Wes e s .7bd*“l:MldMt: M* ; “l ' :
| | ee _ ft mubtelif telakkilerden, birer misal yermekle geri, agai, yukari dogru siralanmest ile big 7
Fig. 5.4. Introduction of the Modern Movement to Turkey through popular publications and illustrated family magazines. Left: A Corbusean villa featured as “The Contemporary Villa of |
Monsieur Jacques” in Muhit, 1929. Right: “A Cubic-House,” published in the “Practical, ,
_ Economical, and Healthy Houses” pages of the same magazine, 1929. ,
exclusively functionalist and rationalist terms, and its undecorated cubic aesthetic
was presented as a manifestation of the character of concrete and steel, “the only buildin: ials suitable for for today.” ThIheision of “wide windwindows, ple lighample light ullding materials suitable today.” provision of “wide and air, smooth and clean surfaces, [and] the absence of germ- and dust-gathering
;character - ° 39 .of- the : : -building, ° e - : .=°-eSe. .corners and details” was particularly emphasized to explain the healthy and hygienic
“Cubic,” how bymeans no-means the promoted only styl otedpopular in the |~ ubic, however, was by no the only style in these
wlar ,
publications. It was only one among a wide range of examples, from colonial
} American h s and G heimatstyle « . “Mediterranean-style _ American homes and German heimatstyle cottages to editerranean-style villas villas” _
- - . be ~ - verandahs 7 7 . .ands loggias, - . —all featured * . : as. ‘¢ ¢ . healthy, 7 . . functional, - ° - . and ~ ,. ; with : arcaded “modern,
eautiful homes” 5.5).°° About the same time Muhit promoted the “cubic house” | beautiful homes” (fig. 5.5).3? About the(fig. same time Muhit promoted the “cubic house” ited above, above,Ititalso alsopublished published a villa in the “French modern style,” ahwith ith Queen cited a villa in the “French modern style,” a house
eC. : . 99 ° : , e ; . e e . . “even ld styl nodate mode fi d hygiene” (fig. 5.5).22
featu of “American homes” with shingles and wood , AnneAnne features, and da ber number o merican homes” with shingles and wood siding. siding.3! Even “a classic house”—-a Georgian mansion—was published in 1931, showing how
even an Old style can accommodate modern comfort and hygiene” (fig. 5.5).
Living Modern: Cubic Houses and Apartments - 205 —W——
se cee YEDICUN No. 76 ~ Y SAYa BL 4oe as)aah — Re 8 fNEVA le ¥: P ES Jo a ea ae ee VA SE! |
\ee a i iuieee iH Hiwhl . *eens Wy WS mec tt H LEP” SNES sig ASH . | |gare Sigsr” We i Za NS | 4 oe (ti (| —— — im OA Nr| ; ist: ee Tet! (Oy| ee IE . ec fh | reed eeut: cee Uc kath Akdeniz tarzt gizel bir villa SINAN
NY ZN nn iy . Cecsrarserlik ’ coe |
ea Sree bee Sh AS is
Nes IN " bgt) Oro’ ie +7 eaahe f, BR cys a. AN TSS Cee sie Nie i a oad eeeeeee ieds| | es ES A a ai oy easpeamr amg cme gaan ti: ANNE AM storm h
wkSEM cAI meee Pee | | ives —— ie —_ De DO eT PR meer aere Ss A ae
Seweee = Greener tet : Beamer Quinn. S pegATS ey. C)aEe a aweoe an | Sarlor in (pox laraga 1 t , . me |owas: ~ Yevek Gene |RS E> ||:i§80 Zz
ee
= ‘ =Fe;reri1gIn -7?8ai)Ss— 77 (4Sy otc=_ 4
i am --§ X ZN) ooles ne, 1 omy= be ANS 7_=| Baw __|¥LAN L_ cnt 6 J
=> Af. oe
| MUHIT
3 Craig} te?
Bu haftaki planiarimiz Akdeniz tarzi bir | vermig oluyor. Locya tabir ettikleri ; maktadir. Birinci katta ig yatak odasi, villaya aittir, Bu'tarz villalardan mem. | igerlek pencerelerin tegkil ettigi veranda : bir taraga, ve bir banyo salonu mevcutleketimizde henliz inga edilmemigtir, fa- | si ile bu villa bir dag etegine gok yara- ; tur, Bu viffanin ayrica genig bir de bo-
kat Fransada, Italyada, Ispanyada gok gir. ik katta verandaya agilan genig bir durum kati vardir, Bu katta bir garaj,
mebzuldir. Mimarimiz bu modeli gizmek- | yemek odasi ve salon vardir. Bir mutfak : bir gamagirlik, bir depo, bir usak odasi,
Kl ik Bir Ew
le bu tare villlarin nimunesini jik defa | ve bie vestibiil zemin katini tamamla- ve bir de abdeshane meveuttur,
rt = oOo ee EE A= SESE SSS aae eeeSS ee Sere, pS Bares St Be, eee 0St Se ee ele pS eraS | oH UO a |SSS eee (SS oro eee ee=ee rae =
——_——— ee =ee= EEE A od ——————
geile Sli: Gide ijt: | Gthe Gilg sz c=
iste ye =F tee == == == a SS He Set TESS SHE ee
westes ee =o eee Se = OS SS | SS = =a
PF EB SSalitt: eS = SS>—— 8s = ———— oa == 2S oo = as SS —=s, tt, Sh
( E=| a a eRe COREA HS 9 SN ND Wa 0 a a aaa Evin On cebhest
COP PEE REPT IST? KS
es a ——% Pos, le.yt at ey * vifMEDS Bodkse NS BPI aOe Ee : a oy A SES. 4 a S[ Opie
Fig. 5.5. Stylistic plurality Ww LOETie~ LS feT/TNEE fs ey oole Ie sis ySue Goray m7if"9H bd “De 4 | Kegel CCAIR IRE RPL LTR. SEERA 7 il fa WiSELEIEES _ , cea Si cama a i ae — ar= |- -PP) , (ia4 eeSaeel | i. EES "|Ke eat oO GB |. ARN , jeg RIO) aay ee ‘i.~wi . ae -e“an {ales .: ap : a.rg. ,. :- .:iS . ON tagge, — ; ae tee ot . a _4g 6 eySA ae Be | ; _. _ Caml taragalar: yaz miisaittir. giinierinde gok misafir kabuliine Bu \=\| ;a —— | Ki villakati birolmadigi tek kattan Bodu| |& : -| a; |ae rum icinibarettir. temeli o nisbo an fI bettedir, ve maliyet fiatini wucuzlat"Bat J C) _||k. ; : _ eo tt | en 1 | i maktadir. ~ nan | _ | D i a | , Istimal edilen nevine ; - la spa . . - malzemenin: . so. 7 : : ' . —— ——- (|a :- !_ 7 | -
—— a ZF 7 ee ee - edecegiz. j oe re - ee
gore, vilmal a 3 -olabilir. ila 9-000 — lira‘ arasin . S|_.:| araeeas da bir bu fiata REST roT
_: |» yine Ameri| =p at 9} oa = a a rr | = . kanGelecek tipi villa sayllarrmizda planlarini. nesre devam - | a . empetemmasn , a es
, —— —nnn——ornn—nnn——! BY Villani planina dikkat ediniz: Amerikan mimar: en ufak kodseden istifnde etme-
; ‘sini bilmis, ve kullanishligint harici gitzcl manzarastna feda etmemistir. .
Fig. 5.6. An “American villa” published in Yedigtin (1939). The openness, horizontally spread-out
plan, and lawn suggest an automobile-dependent suburban life.
Living Modern: Cubic Houses and Apartments . 207 ——————
Collectively these examples suggest that in the late 1920s and early 1930s, it was not so much architectural style but more the connotations of modern, Western-style living that were promoted with these “model homes.” Their plurality of styles notwithstanding, they all represented new and Western concepts of family life and domestic culture that the republic idealized. This overt admiration of Western models would become increasingly problematic as nationalist sentiments took over toward the end of the 1930s. Still, the appeal of European and American homes and lifestyles seems
never to have diminished for these popular publications. As late as 1938-1939,
Yedigtin featured a series of “model American villas”—the quintessential suburban type of single-story homes with lawns, patios, and garages (fig. 5.6). Without a hint of irony, cost estimates were given for building them out of brick or wood “in the vicinity of Istanbul.” Such model designs evoke a utopian vision of Turkey with suburban middle-class lives, single-family dwellings, and access to modern amenities such
as cars and household appliances—a vision far removed from the realities of the
country.
The highly popular and perhaps most characteristically “republican” magazine, Yedigiin, consistently published model designs for modern homes throughout the 1930s. Many of these were flat-roofed, boxy designs exhibiting the characteristic features of “cubic style” (Rubik tarz), a term used descriptively and, for the most part, with positive connotations until the late 1930s. They ranged in size from minimal dwellings like “a charming three-room box house” or a compact two-story “city house” to a “large villa for big families with many guests” or a “five-room but very functional villa” to be built within a large garden.* In every case, the estimated cost of the house was given, suggesting that these were indeed intended as models to be emulated by prospective owners. Occasionally, some critical commentary was added, as in the case of a “very modern and cubic villa” that had a large, L-shaped living floor, left open or minimally divided for kitchen, living, dining, study, and music areas (fig. 5.7).35 According to the magazine’s commentary, it “sacrificed the plan to aesthetic considerations,” and “while still beautiful and healthy, ... had too few and rather small rooms.” Such comments, coupled with a closer analysis of the actual built examples in Turkey, suggest that although the flat roofs, wide terraces, balconies, and boxy volumes of the “cubic style” were welcomed as expressions of modernity, this understanding of the “modern” was limited to a formal rather than a spatial definition of modern architecture. New concepts of open plan, open kitchen, continuous space, and transparency between layers of space were still undigested by a Wohnkultur accustomed to thinking in terms of “rooms” and traditional concepts of privacy.
In 1936, Yedigtin stated that from then on, in addition to publishing model designs taken from foreign publications, it would also feature designs by Turkish
architects. Through 1938, model designs were “commissioned” (siparis edildi) to one unnamed architect,*° and later they went to Emin Necip Uzman, a prominent re-
publican architect with a successful career mostly in residential design.” Their model designs incorporated some features familiar to the lives of Turkish families,
——— 208 .« Living Modern: Cubic Houses and Apartments !
. |: de ff. Va _ - ak7os | aN,e W/E {Sai WA SAVANE VLEK : |
. yl a : or o Lif e a,|
Ae fntorr Girlie || at) > ( oderr Lirliifla + / . : . . 4 Vi _. comes, wees : - , . . . . - 5 Mee ee TY _. 8al yb Pe Ww Se . | y oY ee a Seen = Soa.: ; ® og osa:fr. i OS Sea aotSer x¢-4 TE“5ee: ° cogs Wee! | SN BES a a nes (reas oe Be Sy oe os :TEPyyOSE-on aaWo oe Bn ET 7hobsae, of . Wr ic ge oh ope ca i heey hee S50? ORE 2; :
: o | sn \ [Reese] Ree ; ’ ere = | — | a, re ob ke Set TT ed ne ES a : ON Bee | Ca oe eeeaee
,fo . : , oo fo 7 2 fo rs re ce | [fio RET SE _ 5 : : s oe TR oy RE 2 lesan | | | ‘ eqs es / Cae opera of). |i Bee SS bee EE A: | 5 : | 3 Birinci Kab | Sl ikinei kat , ~~) dl a
jo: eT. oS od GSD a GRO Oana — fo oes Le ae : bt See SoCo} g- pee
:
:‘- :-:|:; ..|,;er.banal ee | | fob : . fs . . . :: -:.:ea . a Ll . : , . . : , : a 8 . a . a ; oe . ge a : a ; a . e . el - es owe . a ° o- - . oe age +. , e
: } Bu vill& son derece modern ve kubiktir. Harici manzaras: cok gosterislidir. © | — y Fakat agrk soylemek lazim gelirse harici manzarasinin giizelligine, dahili tak- 5
| -! -simat: kurban edilmistir. Bu villanin konforu mukemmel olmakla beraber oda- :
| 2 lart pek kiguk ve azdir. Buna mukabil bol hava giren genigs pencerelere ve : , _ | 2 spor yapmiya miusait buyuk bir teragaya maliktir. Bu villanin maliyet fiat: +: — _
. : 3 4000 Jira arasindadir, | at , : Fig. 5.7. A “modern villa” identified as “cubic style” and published in the “Your Dream Houses” _ section of Yedigtin (1937). It was praised for “large windows al lowing ample ventilation” and the , a
-exterior.” - - | | -
| provision of a wide terrace that could be used for “sports and exercise.” It was criticized, however, oe because “there are too few rooms and the interior plan has been sacrificed for the beauty of the _ | :
Living Modern: Cubic Houses and Apartments .- 209 —————
ese ueee | i .Re a wee Saye EIGN No. 304 HO as a Sry | . Ape ig V Fe ee «-l\ $a eeA
OT a er ‘| GS >
wee a Yiiksek yayl6larda ae —— be. nw eee teal Alts Odalt Bayék Bir Sayfiye Evi cS” = neo mw NM fe ie a. ~4 AT © alg QS ersy \ Vo y an
i eal Paar _ EF 7 bir cag evi ee —___ : Roe ek? -[) ee aes acre hl ~Seeen ee e Mecast 2 in a | = _= —— seen OO
pee ~
eo|| Ibi ae aaa seeeel SS "2S ye of wo| ena Sa aie ee oe Peer Teeoa | ey a |e !a1 ame ne Sransesorsccccaeeers=== | if makao sartile pek ucuza mal olmaktadr. = 7 Tt a _''!=—'oe |'
ce ee ee eee, OL he = a oF ry TL SSeS ze Eebla fl eee 4 Vestas | || oda | oda | ederiz. vas oO a: he — = + TT jd i Ke LL =...aae| |PES = fl-MeL | Ih| mem ||.||)rin ss:eemt cee ihires |. Sesame S| |cg:ee eeefo Po) ki lace gl sisinng ra enc +t | . | ee el See aan lana bitin yaz mevsimi miid- Birinci kat genis misafir odasina, ye_————— | hol —— >| hol, sere valent gibi hulastcak heen ! wha —teuedvaioss aa | $2 eee: E
\ math | oy fo Sp OR) cine Retin mm +e — pore Pe] t
8.50 goon detince tahayyiil ettikleri biitiin ev modelle- Bu hafta size oldukga _kalabalix bir | igin disiniiimastir, Yukardaki planiars + mek salonuna, mutfaga, ve kiles vatite.
pss: Fini bu aayfalarde bulacablardir takai ediyorut | aba ir ale ne kadar kallanglrne | eel naw ann mit eve Bu villa bahse ortasinda inga edilmek | elverishi oldugunu gériirstiniiz. yatak odalari vardir,
Fig. 5.8. Designs for model homes “commissioned to a Turkish architect” by the popular weekly Yedigtin in 1938. Left: A “mountain house” adapting the traditional central-hall plan type. Right: A “large suburban house with six rooms.”
mitigating the conspicuous “foreignness” of the earlier examples taken from Western publications. Most noticeable are the addition of a Turkish-style toilet (alaturka held) separate from the bathroom and the more rigid internal division of the house into separate rooms along a corridor or around a central hall, or sofa, in the manner of traditional Turkish houses (fig. 5.8).3® While the exteriors still displayed the leitmotifs of cubic—boxy aesthetic, cantilevers, terraces, often a single circular window (corresponding to the entrance or the bathroom)—the interiors addressed cultural priorities such as privacy, separate kitchen and pantry (kiler), and separation of the family living room from the more ceremonial guest room. An interesting aspect of Emin Necip Uzman’s designs for Yedigiin is their programmatic definition for hypothetical but very specific client profiles and imagined lifestyles. “A four-room farm house,” “a five-room mountain retreat,” “a four-room village or resort house,” “a five-room urban house for an artist,” and “a six-room house for those living far from the city” are some examples of these carefully identified designs (fig. 5.9).°° This emphasis on the individuality of the family and the need for custom-designed homes was one of the major devices architects employed in seek-
————— 210 .~ Living Modern: Cubic Houses and Apartments
ing professional legitimacy. The implicit claim was that each modern family was unique in its needs for domestic space, and like the services of a family doctor, the
services of a professional architect could best fulfill those needs. At the same time, the designs published in Yedigiin reveal a lot about the images of modernity in the minds of the architects. With their hypothetical sites and approximate costs carefully specified, these designs are evocative of a happily transformed modern Turkey in which families built weekend retreats or decided “to move out of the city” to the suburbs
(sayfiye). The distaste for dense urban life, the idealization of the single-family © dwelling within a garden, and the conspicuous absence of higher-density residential types such as apartments, row houses, and multifamily blocks are important clues to the prevailing ideological climate, about which more will be said later. The reduction of civilization to “civility” and Western lifestyles and the strong pedagogical function of architecture and interior design in inducing these habits and tastes come across strongly in the “contemporary homes” sections of popular magazines. For example, detailed instructions were given on arranging furniture “in the manner of European and American homes,” with small side tables for tea or coffee, table lamps, curtains color-coordinated with upholstery, and so forth (fig. 5.10). A |
| af a. EE a Ly PR {orA STE ... os: fete 1.SE eas "i AeFa rd Shea | . fis frre eoeae qe: hs | _ sanatkdr evi | i | |e “gf Gece: | OO SHENG BA |] — et | rs ECCOERES) pve ; ——_ Ot os || -SeGGRRGl oo ae — ae zi = 5,i —; = |= © mal ‘n —= fo) G3, a yn (5 © Ba D SSS 3 Vie s, : Sehirden uzak yastyanlara 6 odal bir yawa | | Sokak iizerinde 5 odalt bir PO
| Wn , Proje: MIMAR EMIN NECIP UZMAN +H D
ctl ee ln. Rena tneranenebprintemieneeiirneent In Sai Serra . io bol ziyanin girmesi gin diigiiniil milgtiir. i U ‘ Se eT ent Ikinci katta bir muharrire veya bir ressama mesai adast veya atel- i oat ame aN
Bu evin cephesi ve umumi menzaras: cidden kibar ve géz aliidir - fn ou bya odader "ie pata idetce geslmektedie. vatek edase | LLL f°
yantbaginda bir- giyim odasi vardir ki, ayni zamanda ve icab: . “A Soc a Ste r +) — = ee alinde sandik inodasi vazifesini gérebilir. == 1
{I a weal a LTT i aQ i 4) LE Be ee | Ecc ae ne a | me ~ OE. 2 nea : é pL a) ee it sislenarremam: 1000 ae
SS ES =
MisaFia oTUnma YEME /\ yer 3 “TKA aoa _ * :
Lo — OO Se ere ae Pe eS a & hee aA ae SeOl ae etal:te aPr UIA IeeyCoe een oe Be ea erSpee vee eeerase en Oe(Nia aOO 4mcmmienicnm wee Ur i Bey fealSE ne
ee Re AAS “ee ee ie.a af ye ee ee ae ee Re eo Eg oy, Eee ae ph eeey ee By [rita a0eeaoe ape Pheis| ee 1“Tee pl den te)a Ee oi OStaaera aCis ESWU pos |die. Res! Mt
ay AA fenIRS SmAeeee Pee ONTa ee he Se Leeee
pee Oe ig ia (ce ) Paes we Uti to Wivecirimnctgay ae oq Le Gc ee! chery gh PO a vig Le ae ee ee |e ae Ma OL Ye le ole a 1
in pain : ; ae .
Pe ee ESRR Sd ee i| pe PoeTe : :os eemae eee|6.i| thee ee geieeee ey me leeBBB coe oles
nl 1 een ae pene |, Foo os ar hia. oo ws _ . on Pe 8 Lao
Bee . |. aa- ob| See : ee e . “Wt ° . * e oF . e . hi *. e ,ee/e e e ¢.° e e* , cf . ° a . . . CJ s * e * e a ; ueheee8 esa:wees. Bi wect. 5 ‘| ot ra Sl.
eae. 5 i a ENGL i -ey eee ae oe 4 CERES, EN RPE SOP: AERD aniiyOO “a te coo, sacl ee me A ac E enti cates she of § = a ge ee oS en She, mocks Get bP = “Sie.
‘ * oF . .* Le a Aare
: Ce ee 2 Pe vo na ep ee eas : = Bese See See ee ies See eer a re as A ee ae Re Ore: aan : : JA eS Se oe ee Rr ealaewe . : ; egie Yr Si =ee oe eee Gok aOr 4 ae *elise ee ee ee Ne ee eee ae ee aie SBee OES o ee Se ie :° Mi eS = 0 a ee ee ae ——_— ; Po Pees Ts ee ce Ree ee tee er ie, Se ee oe” co = ce —he6 oe a ee " Bon aeA ee gees Se aoree 6 reeee . :,
co Se ee re : et _ te aa ee eye oe .. oe fae “ :
nie aque 3 é EG eae as oman ea RN a ge Ke ee Oat OE MERE oS an eee
a —: : ee 2ee: Pe os Rr,|.fo5eer ee) eee oyBEN ee i 3 : .” gt a e.. ma ee _z=::aam oS Page Oe eee eee ee ee : SRE oo : :2aae iin ge . SS ie ogee ee pe Se ee Se eee ae- = al es eg eee : a ee ie mis eee aae ha? :~ - oe eel ‘ae =esa a og re paige Sess geeee eee:": :re _Re‘~~. enSe“Pe eecree es ; Se es. 2 i‘ .; ee —-* ” pe * ae a . : ee ee aa, : Br gs fs peut Com Be es Ean elie. eae ‘ : .—_ Paeit - ade i: SERS pierinr ee eg ere ee Be eee x : : Hates . Shag. ee Boe ee ee . pg RS = : ee
;- ::: OTS : Aeee oe ee ee ave ‘;:3 :::pe 3oa fo pe Geeee es
i i 2 ee oR ie ee Bae cg RE eg Ee ee ae eg oY ARR Rae OS a eee eee age ; REE ~ Sage Ee cag ee a ee ee : Bg hae a etn Cerne Se ae ea ies HEUER oh uti eee . - oil F samme 5, Sg? Se ta eee ° pee ae eee ee ee weer pace : ; nal erg “ines