239 37 23MB
English Pages 320 [324] Year 2004
RICHARD BEN CRAMER WINNER OF THE PULITZER PRIZE AUTHOR OF WHATir TAKES AND JOE DIMAGGIO: THE HERO'S LIFE
HOW
ISRAEL
LOST THE FOUR QUESTIONS "Solid
the
and
irrefutable
tragic
Palestinians
Cramer's theme
.
predicament of the .
.
.
funny and
and down-to-earth.
1^
.
.
.
.
polemic that deserves
-Amos
.
Elon, The
bitterly sad,
This book
to
Israelis
is
is
and
shrewd
a powerful
be read."
New
York Review of Books
?:
How Israel Lost
Praise for
"Driven by sympathy and
enough
[Cramer] suspends moral judgments just
curiosity,
to bring alive the ironies
.
.
.
of human
life
under brutal conditions.
He is able to do something few journalists succeed at: makes
much
institutions, emotions,
moral
.
.
.
He
and the gradual corruption of so
vivid the invisible dust of despair
—
capturing a Zeitgeist.
—the
sensibility, solidarity
toxic gas of un-
derlying pessimism that has seeped into everything during almost forty years of
occupation."
—Gadi Taub, Chicago Tribune "How
Israel Lost
.
.
.
some poignant
offers
portraits of those caught
up
in the
Middle East tragedy and delivers sharp arguments on how things got to where they are and how they can move forward. Cramer knows his stuff." Emst-Ulrich Franzen, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel .
.
.
—
"If ever a
book on
and the Palestinians was a good read,
Israel
tion to the half-century-long conflict.
When it comes
to prognosis,
vice to both sides."
"A
Cramer is
Cramer shoots
its this
introduc-
great at telling an anecdote
straight
from the hip
.
.
.
in giving ad-
—Publishers Weekly
anecdotal, thought-provoldng and often entertaining book about the and arguments on both sides But its the personal stories [Cramer] that win the day, by putting a human face on an endless conflict." The Arizona Republic
lively,
faults tells
.
.
.
—
"Herein
lies
the lucid charm
the forest for the trees.
.
.
.
oiHow Israel Lost: The author hasn't lost sight of
Mr
Cramers argument
is
cogent: Israelis have for-
gotten their birthright."
— Daniel Asa Rose,
Islew
York Observer
"Cramer's quick, anecdotal, very personal style puts an entertaining spin on an otherwise extremely painful
how they affect the lives
reality.
His forte
is
in capturing events
by showing
of real people."
— Elena Lappin, The New York Times Book Review
—
"Cramer one of the most memorable nonfiction stylists ahve has invented a new way to cover one of the most devastating wars in human history. ... It is an account that is bound to result in a mixture of laughter, tears, anger and, ulti.
.
.
mately, desperation."
— Steve Weinberg, Orlando Sentinel "Cramer has a This
is
real gift for bringing to life the
people caught up
in the endless
those whose not own. —even, or indeed wonderful book, courageous and honest — McConnell, The American Conservative
struggle
politics are
especially
his
.
.
.
..."
a
Scott
"[How epic
Israel Lost] recaptures the hip, verbal
What
rlMhm
of Cramer's 1992 poHtical
" It
Takes.
—Casey
Seiler,
The Times Union (Albany, NY)
Also by Richard
What It
Takes:
Ben Cramer
The
Joe DiMaggio: The
Way to the White House
Hems Life
What Do You Think of Ted Williams Now?
HOW ISRAEL
LOST THE FOUR QUESTIONS
Richard Ben Cramer
SIMON & SCHUSTER PAPERBACKS New York London Toronto Sydney
For Ruby
SIMON & SCHUSTER PAPERBACKS Rockefeller Center
1230 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020 Copyright
© 2004, 2005 by Richard Ben Cramer
All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in
whole or in part in any form.
First
Simon
Simon
& Schuster paperback edition 2005
& Schuster Paperbacks and colophon are registered trademarks & Schuster, Inc.
of Simon
For information about special discounts
for bulk purchases,
& Schuster Special Sales at
Simon
please contact
1-800-456-6798 or [email protected]
Designed by Jaime Putorti
Map by Paul PugHese Manufactured
in the
United States of America
987654321
10
The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition
as follows:
Cramer, Richard Ben.
How Israel lost / Richard Ben Cramer, cm.
p. 1.
— Moral and
Arab-Israeh conflict
conflict
—
— Peace.
1993
conditions.
4.
— Social conditions.
Israel
7.
National characteristics,
DS119.76.C73
Arab-Israeh
—West Bank— —Gaza — —Ethnic—
6.
Strip
I.
Title.
2004045354
ISBN-13: 978-0-7432-5028-3
ISBN-10: 0-7432-5028-1
ISBN-13: 978-0-7432-5029-0 (Pbk) ISBN-10: 0-7432-5029-X (Pbk)
Social
Social conditions. relations.
Israel
Israeli.
2004
956.05—dc22
2.
Palestinian Arabs
3.
Palestinian Arabs
5.
ethical aspects.
Contents
Preface to the paperback edition
vii
I.
Why do we care about Israel?
II.
Why don't the Palestinians have a state?
III.
What is a Jewish state?
139
IV.
Why is there no peace?
227
Glossary
279
Author s Note and Acknowledgments
297
1
65
Preface to the paperback edition
/jLllah
is
He was
most kind, and he sent Yassir Arafat off to Paris
succeeded
as
Palestinian Authority
chairman of the
Mahmoud
by
to die.
PLO and president of the
Abbas, the former prrime
minister and a longstanding opponent of suicide bombing.
Within days,
Abu Mazen, as Abbas is known, declared a cessation
of attacks against attackers,
Israelis.
He
and he sacked the commanders who failed to do so.
met with the leaders of the their
ordered his security forces to stop
promise to respect
ultra-Islamic groups
his cease-fire.
He
and secured
Within weeks. Abbas met
with Arik Sharon and together they proclaimed a truce.
The The
Palestinians' vote for
Palestinian people
known)
Abbas was an affirmation of hope.
were convinced
that life with the Israelis can
thing better, than Idll-and-be-killed.
(as
they have always
be something
other,
some-
The clear support from a clear
majority gave Abbas the upper hand to put his truce into effect.
There was a mirror image of hope on the Israeh politicians
and common
folk who
side,
from
supported Arik Sharon's plan to
VII
Preface to the paperback edition
The support of
pull the Israelis out of Gaza.
a clear majority
helped Sharon to survive a rejection of the plan by his
As
write, in the Spring of 2005, the parties are
I
way from an accord
—from
own party. still
the vision that George
a long
W. Bush
sketched out: two nations living side by side in peace. Sharons plan to withdraw from Gaza into mothballs.
The
more and more still
Israelis
is
a clear attempt to put that vision
continue to build their wall, seizing
Palestinian land.
Hamas and
dedicated to the destruction of Israel
truce
peatedly
temporary.
at best,
is,
The
cease-fire has
have killed several Palestinian
truce endures
—
bly fragile
like a
endured
could snuff out while
it is
X know Sharon
to
wildflower in Alaska
emerge,
it is
make
ple).
But
and
Is-
in Israel,
kids. But, so far, the
It is
to
beautiful,
its life. Still, it is
precious, and dou-
—a miracle
now prey
won't
make any new
for the hard-
any harshness that
and must be prized
scuttling the
friends with the assertion that
peace process.
him, as George Bush does, as a great to
re-
here.
I
is
been marred
—and so does hope.
In this place, hope cannot be ignored.
it
their respect for the
—two suicide bombs shattered calm
raeli soldiers
ship
—
Islamic Jihad are
It s
more popular to regard
Man of Peace (who means
real the great vision of a nation for the Palestinian facts are just as
stubborn as Arik Sharon
... so,
peo-
here are
a few to consider:
The withdrawal from Gaza of a few hundred settler famihes, and thousands of
made
soldiers
who had
sense to the army brass.
It
to protect
them, has always
was Sharon s genius
VIII
to
combine
Preface to the paperback edition this practical
plan with a bold assertion that the biggest settle-
—with hundreds of thousands of IsraeUs
ments on the West Bank in residence
—should be regarded hereafter
Gaza withdrawal was presented
as a
Breakthrough!) ... no one talked
as Israeh land.
peace move (No!
much about
A
The
Peace
the other half of
the plan.
George Bush rose
to this
Gaza
bait like a bass
Sunday
in the shallows of a Texas lake.
good
happen
to
in the
Middle East
on a blessed
Bush needed something
—even something
be good, or looked good, or could sound good
.
.
.
that might
forthwith he re-
versed thirty-five years of U.S. policy and announced that
the
all
big settlements should be regarded as part of Israel. So, for a very
modest price
—a
handful of indefensible
— Sharon obtained the
tomato farms on the unhistoric Gaza sand blessing for
all
the designs of his forebears.
He won this without
the unpleasant chore of actually talking to the Palestinians.
were not consulted. In
fact,
Sharon also won Bush's blessing for
his stance that the Palestinians
a clear
end
They
cannot be consulted until there
to terrorism. In the
is
view of Sharon (and Bush), that
means poor Mahmoud Abbas must launch and win against the ultra-Islamic groups. That's the minimal
a
civil
war
demand be-
fore talks can ensue.
No one is more
eloquent on the subject of Sharon's triumph
than his number-one advisor, friend and confidante, his lawyer (and back-channel to the Americans), Weissglass cannot figure
why the
Dov
settlers
Weissglass. In fact,
and the
right
wing are
not dancing in celebration around the Prime Minister's office.
They don't understand what Sharon pulled off (Fortunately
IX
for
Preface to the paperback edition Sharon, the
left didn't
support when his
understand either and lent him crucial
own party voted him down.)
"The disengagement glass, in
the
is
actually formaldehyde," said Weiss-
an interview with the newspaper Haaretz.
amount of formaldehyde
necessary so that there will
that's
not be a political process with the Palestinians.
"Because what
"It supplies
.
.
effectively agreed to with the
I
Americans
was that part of the settlements would not be dealt with at all, and the rest will not be dealt with until the Palestinians turn into Finns. That
is
the significance of what we did.
the freezing of the political process. process,
The
significance
And when you
is
freeze that
you prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, and
you prevent a discussion about the refugees, the borders and Jerusalem. Effectively, this whole package that Palestinian state, with
our agenda sion. All
all
indefinitely.
that
And
it
entails,
all this
is
called the
has been removed from
with authority and permis-
with a Presidential blessing and the ratification of both
houses of Congress.
What more could have been
What more could have been given to the ilLlas, Mr.
Abbas has
troubles.
He
thority with an absolute brutality,
ommend
for
any other people.
about a dozen-and-a-half clan-leader
is
settlers?"
supposed to exert
his au-
which the U.S. would not
He
rec-
inherited, as security troops,
militias, private
commanders and not
anticipated?
armies loyal to their
to the central authority.
he smushed into three central commands about a dozen clan leaders affronted. His
These
—which guaranteed
own
office
compound
was shot up by yahoos from the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, which
— Preface to the paperback edition is
supposed to be the suicide unit of
need succor and
services in the
own
his
party.
His people
most desperate way, but Abbas
has no mechanism to deliver them, save for the band of rapacious
goons
whom Arafat installed as the "government."
Still,
fence
there was
—good news
election
some good news on the largely unreported.
Palestinian side of the
For one
thing, there
was the
by which Abbas was installed. There was, at that same time,
great handwringing, then great celebration about the Iraqi election
—a
miracle,
was called
it
a,
free
But, unremarked, the Palestinians
and fair vote in the Arab world.
went
to the polls
and calmly
elected a calm leader, with a clear madate to restore calm. (So
much
for the Israeli claim that the Palestinians cannot govern themselves.)
Another
more
bit
of Palestinian election news struck
hopeful. In the local elections,
faction, not only participated
dates.
They did well,
risdictions
even
its
own
slate
of candi-
electing local officials in seven out often ju-
where they
ran. It
seems possible that Hamas could party.
Nothing makes people
responsible quicker than work-a-day responsibility.
Hamasniks who'll get the the dead dog out of the
calls to fix
And now it s
the stinkin' sewer line, or get
alley.
When I proffer this hope at book events,
it s
often dismissed
crowd who cannot think of Hamas
in the
as
Hamas, the leading Islamic
but offered
change into a legitimate poUtical
by some
me
as anything
other than a band of terrorist murderers. They point out that
Hamas is not working for "two states living side by side in peace."
Hamas means
to destroy Israel
and drive the Jews
into the sea.
And all that is true, I freely concede. But people change, and parties
with them.
I
offer an
example from the region.
XI
Preface to the paperback edition
Menachem Begin was song ran something like This one's mine,
the leader of a faction whose
this:
theme
There are two hanks of the Jordan
and the other one,
too.
.
.
.
The
militia
of that fac-
tion
was adjudged a terrorist organization, and was responsible
the
first
party,
its
massacre of Arabs in Israel s
symbol was a
"ONLY THIS WAY."
fist
holding a
history.
rifle,
Even
with the
.
for
as a political
Hebrew slogan:
But Begin went on to engineer the
historic
accord with Egypt (and Jordan!) ... he was the winner of the
Nobel Prize
for Peace.
V^ne more
note about reaction to this book.
How
Israel Lost
got a bit of a rough ride, at least in America, because
branded got
as unfriendly to Israel.
much
facts.
static
from the
But American
It's
Israelis
Zionists,
—
interesting to note,
at least
we can
unburdened by
the trouble of reading the book), saw through
it
I
was
never
agree on the
fact (and
without
my dastardly plot
to discredit the Jewish State. Still, I
Israel to
think most readers discerned that what I'm adjuring
do represents her best chance
for a future of peace.
want her children, and the Palestinian children, without
and
fear.
What
livehest life for
I
want
is
precisely
her people.
the nation's founders.
I
It's
what
to
have a
I
life
Israel lost, the best
a vision very close to that of
can't think of a
fonder wish to
offer.
Richard Ben Cramer April 2005
XII
HOW ISRAEL
LOST
jMfiiiiiilii
< Q O Jit:
(Vi