434 25 22MB
English Pages 661 [642] Year 2020
Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management Series Editors: Christoph Herrmann, Sami Kara
Yusuke Kishita Mitsutaka Matsumoto Masato Inoue Shinichi Fukushige Editors
EcoDesign and Sustainability II Social Perspectives and Sustainability Assessment
Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management Series Editors Christoph Herrmann, Braunschweig, Germany Sami Kara, Sydney, Australia
SPLCEM publishes authored conference proceedings, contributed volumes and authored monographs that present cutting-edge research information as well as new perspectives on classical fields, while maintaining Springer’s high standards of excellence, the content is peer reviewed. This series focuses on the issues and latest developments towards sustainability in production based on life cycle thinking. Modern production enables a high standard of living worldwide through products and services. Global responsibility requires a comprehensive integration of sustainable development fostered by new paradigms, innovative technologies, methods and tools as well as business models. Minimizing material and energy usage, adapting material and energy flows to better fit natural process capacities, and changing consumption behaviour are important aspects of future production. A life cycle perspective and an integrated economic, ecological and social evaluation are essential requirements in management and engineering. **Indexed in Scopus** To submit a proposal or request further information, please use the PDF Proposal Form or contact directly: Petra Jantzen, Applied Sciences Editorial, email:[email protected]
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10615
Yusuke Kishita Mitsutaka Matsumoto Masato Inoue Shinichi Fukushige •
•
•
Editors
EcoDesign and Sustainability II Social Perspectives and Sustainability Assessment
123
Editors Yusuke Kishita Department of Precision Engineering The University of Tokyo Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
Mitsutaka Matsumoto National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Masato Inoue Department of Mechanical Engineering Informatics Meiji University Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Shinichi Fukushige Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Waseda University Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
ISSN 2194-0541 ISSN 2194-055X (electronic) Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management ISBN 978-981-15-6774-2 ISBN 978-981-15-6775-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6775-9 © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721, Singapore
Preface
EcoDesign has been a core concept for the manufacturing industry in its efforts to transform the mass production, mass consumption, and mass disposal paradigm toward achieving sustainability. In the last two decades, the ecosystem of the manufacturing industry has been rapidly changing, especially when we look at Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), circular economy, and digitalization. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed our lifestyles to the “New Normal,” where a typical example is to shift from working in the office to working from home using a teleconference system. In response to such emerging needs and enablers, though the impact of COVID-19 has not yet been considered, the scope of EcoDesign has been expanding to cover more diversified areas, such as environmentally conscious design of products, services, manufacturing systems, supply chain, consumption, economies, and society. This book collates 79 papers out of 205 papers presented at EcoDesign 2019— the 11th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, which was held in Yokohama, Japan, from November 25 to 27, 2019. All the 79 papers were peer-reviewed by the EcoDesign 2019 Executive committee. Celebrating the 20 years anniversary of the symposium since its first occurrence in 1999, EcoDesign 2019 provided the excellent platform to share state-of-the-art research and practices in the field of EcoDesign. The total of 278 researchers and practitioners from 28 countries participated in EcoDesign 2019. The book consists of two volumes, i.e., the first volume focuses on “Products, Services, and Business Models,” and the second volume focuses on “Social Perspectives and Sustainability Assessment.” Reflecting the expansion of the symposium scope, the book chapters cover broad areas—product and service design, business models and policies, circular production and life cycle management, green technologies, sustainable manufacturing, sustainable design and user behavior, sustainable consumption and production, EcoDesign of social infrastructure, sustainability education, sustainability assessment and indicators, and energy system design. We believe that the methods, tools, and practices described in the chapters are useful for readers to facilitate value creation for sustainability.
v
vi
Preface
Last but not least, we would like to express our sincere appreciation to all the contributors, supporters, and participants of EcoDesign 2019. This book cannot be published without the help of the executive committee members who cooperated in the peer review of the papers. Bunkyo, Japan
Yusuke Kishita EcoDesign 2019 Program Chair
Tsukuba, Japan
Mitsutaka Matsumoto EcoDesign 2019 Executive Committee Chair
Kawasaki, Japan
Masato Inoue EcoDesign 2019 Executive Committee Co-chair
Shinjuku, Japan
Shinichi Fukushige EcoDesign 2019 Executive Committee Co-chair
Contents
Part I 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sustainable Design and User Behavior
The Chinese-Brand Electric Vehicles in the Eyes of the US Consumers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenichiro Chinen, Hideki Endo, Mitsutaka Matsumoto, and Yongliang Stanley Han
3
Comparative Analysis of the Users’ Kansei Evolutions Over Their Short and Long-Lived Products’ Lifetimes in Iran . . . . . . . . Seyed Javad Zafarmand
17
A Toolkit for Designing Products and Services Fit for Circular Consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oskar Rexfelt and Anneli Selvefors
33
Embedding a Sustainability Focus in Packaging Development Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenichiro Chinen, Hideki Endo, Mitsutaka Matsumoto, and Yongliang Stanley Han Consumer’s Perception of Plastics in Everyday Products in Relation to Their Personality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kenichiro Chinen, Hideki Endo, Mitsutaka Matsumoto, and Yongliang Stanley Han
49
61
User Activity Matters: An Activity Theory Informed Design Toolkit for Sustainable Behavior Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wanjun Chu, Wiktoria Glad, and Renee Wever
79
Strengthening Aesthetic Individualization in Product Design to Enhance Customer Loyalty and Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lisa Hagedorn, Gerald Kremer, and Rainer Stark
97
vii
viii
8
Contents
Analysis of the Personal Cars Sustainability in Relation with Their Formalistic Characteristics in Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 Mohammad Zolfaghari and Seyed Javad Zafarmand
Part II 9
Sustainable Consumption and Production
Enhancing Role and Participation of Industry and Community for Sustainable E-Waste Recovery for Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP): Case Study Kuala Lumpur Malaysia . . . . . 135 Ahmad Fariz Mohamed and Muhammad Izzat Rasnan
10 Understanding of Individuals’ Intention Toward Car Sharing Usage in the Southeast-Asia Region: From University Students in Thailand and Indonesia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 Yoon-Young Chun, Mitsutaka Matsumoto, and Kiyotaka Tahara 11 Economy-Wide Material Flow Analysis and Its Projection: DMI Versus TMR in Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 Shoki Kosai and Eiji Yamasue 12 Ecological Smart and Sustainable Waste Management: A Conceptual Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 Yun Arifatul Fatimah, Rochiyati Murniningsih, and Agus Setiawan 13 Information Flow System for Chemicals in Products (CiP) with Adequate Attention to the Social Dimension: The Japanese Challenge and the Way Forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 Makiko Kohno and Masahiko Hirao Part III
EcoDesign of Social Infrastructure
14 Forecast of Future Impacts of Using ICT Services on GHG Emissions Reduction and GDP Growth in Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Xiaoxi Zhang, Machiko Shinozuka, Yuriko Tanaka, Yuko Kanamori, and Toshihiko Masui 15 Methodology for Modeling the Energy and Material Footprint of Future Telecommunication Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 Lutz Stobbe, Nils F. Nissen, Jan Druschke, Hannes Zedel, Nikolai Richter, and Klaus-Dieter Lang 16 Towards Intercity Cooperation: Comparison of Spatial Transport Energy Efficiency Between Central and Peripheral Cities in Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 Shoki Kosai and Eiji Yamasue
Contents
ix
17 Energy Efficiency Within Sustainable Development in Asia: A Boundary Infrastructure and Knowledge Based Frame of Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 Harald E. Otto 18 Study on the Quantitative Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions in Sewage-Sludge Treatment System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 Zhiyi Liang, Toru Matsumoto, Lei Zhang, and Bing Liu Part IV
Sustainability Education
19 Gamifying Sustainable Design to Enhance Environmental Consciousness of Industrial Design Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291 Suphichaya Suppipat, Allen H. Hu, and Treechada Chotiratanapinun 20 Consideration of Communication Methods with the Next Generation for Sustainable Living Through the Case Study of a Visiting Lecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 Shota Tajima, Satoko Nasu, and Daisuke Fujikawa Part V
Sustainability Assessment and Indicators
21 Progress for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment by Means of Digital Lifecycle Twins — A Taxonomy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 Theresa Riedelsheimer, Sabrina Neugebauer, and Kai Lindow 22 Adopting Life Cycle Assessment for Various Greenhouse Typologies in Multiple Cropping Environment in Australia . . . . . . 347 Ana Evangelista, Yi-Chen Lan, Zhonghua Chen, Vivian W. Y. Tam, and Rina Datt 23 Process Modelling for an Efficient and Dynamic Energy Consumption for Fresh Produce in Protected Cropping . . . . . . . . . 361 Premaratne Samaranayake, Goran Lopaticki, Wei Liang, Vivian Tam, Zhonghua Chen, and Yi-Chen Lan 24 CO2 Removal Using the Sun and Forest: An Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of a Solar & Biomass Hybrid Carbon Capture and Sequestration Plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 Shutaro Takeda, Andrew John Chapman, and Hoseok Nam 25 Environmental and Economic Impacts of Biofouling on Marine and Coastal Heat Exchangers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 Ninan Theradapuzha Mathew, Johan Kronholm, Klas Bertilsson, Mélanie Despeisse, and Björn Johansson
x
Contents
26 Ecological Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Sensor-Based Parking Prediction Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 Jan Druschke, Stephan Fath, Lutz Stobbe, Nils F. Nissen, Nikolai Richter, and Klaus-Dieter Lang 27 Scenario Analysis of Environmental Impact of Paddy Rice Farming Systems Utilizing Different Fertilizer Materials . . . . . . . . 415 Tatsuo Hishinuma, Saaya Ono, and Atsuo Ikeguchi 28 Techno-Economic Assessment on Waste from Palm Oil Mill to Electricity in Malaysia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 Hashizume Michino and Tokimatsu Koji 29 Influence of Thermal Conductivity and Subsurface Temperature on Life-Cycle Environmental Load of the Ground Source Heat Pump in Bangkok, Thailand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 441 Yutaro Shimada, Youhei Uchida, Hideaki Kurishima, and Koji Tokimatsu 30 Material Criticality Assessment for Business Purposes Using Fuzzy Linguistic Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 455 Xiaobo Chen, James Goddin, and Jacquetta Lee 31 Development of a Method for Measuring Resource Efficiency for Product Lifecycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469 Gaku Miyake, Naoya Miyaji, Akio Tajima, Mitsutaka Matsumoto, and Keijiro Masui Part VI
Energy System Design
32 Techno-Economic Analysis of a Hybrid Solar-Hydrogen-Biomass System for Off-Grid Power Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 483 Naoto Takatsu and Hooman Farzaneh 33 Optimal Design and Operation of a Residential Hybrid Microgrid System in Kasuga City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 499 Yuichiro Yoshida, Nagashima Keisuke, and Hooman Farzaneh 34 Social Equity and Lifestyle Conscious Policy Making for the Energy Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513 Andrew John Chapman and Yosuke Shigetomi 35 Exergy and Environmental Analysis of a Bio-Hydrogen Supply Chain Using Data Envelope Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525 Daisuke Hara, Chiharu Misaki, Hiromu Sugihara, Seiya Kako, Noboru Katayama, and Kiyoshi Dowaki
Contents
xi
36 The Readiness Levels of Japan Supported Biomass Energy Conversion Technology Development Projects in Emerging Southeast Asia: Verification of the J-TRA Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541 Issui Ihara, Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo, and Hiroshi Onoda 37 Evaluation and Improvement Proposals for a Business Facility Solar and Ground-Heat Hybrid Heat Supply System . . . . . 557 Daiki Yoshidome, Ryo Kikuchi, Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo, and Hiroshi Onoda 38 The Import Structure of LNG from Russia to Japan by Cognitive Map and Text Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575 Kengo Takeda, Norovsambuu Purevsuren, Koji Tokimatsu, Masako Ikegami, and Mikael Hook 39 Recovery Analysis of Domestic Electric Storage Water Heaters . . . 589 Emilia Fernández, Carolina Devoto, and Pedro Piñeyro 40 Feasibility Study for Electric Vehicle Utilization as Grid Supporting in Indonesian Power System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 605 Muhammad Huda, Koji Tokimatsu, Arif Darmawan, and Muhammad Aziz 41 Techno-economic Analysis on Renewable Energy via Hydrogen from Macro and Micro Scope Views . . . . . . . . . . . . 619 Meng Chen, Tatsuya Ookubo, Kei Hasegawa, Manabu Ihara, Takuya Oda, and Koji Tokimatsu 42 Dynamic Simulation of Woody Biomass Co-generation System Considering Time-Varying Heat Demand: A Japanese Community Bathhouse Case Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 633 Noriaki Nakatsuka, Yusuke Kishita, and Fumiteru Akamatsu 43 A Feasibility Study of a Japanese Power to Gas Concept—A Case Study of Rokkasho Village . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 647 Yuji Mizuno, Yuki Ishimoto, and Shigeki Iida
Part I
Sustainable Design and User Behavior
Chapter 1
The Chinese-Brand Electric Vehicles in the Eyes of the US Consumers Kenichiro Chinen, Hideki Endo, Mitsutaka Matsumoto, and Yongliang Stanley Han
Abstract Researchers have found how driving electric vehicles (EVs) can be one solution to the negative environmental impact of petrol or diesel cars because they produce substantially lower emissions and are more energy-efficient than conventional cars. EVs are predicted to be the disruptive market force for transportation and technology. Of one million EVs sold in 2017, more than half of global sales were in China. China has a strong leadership position in the EV industry. The purpose of this study is to examine the US consumers’ reliance on Country-Of-Origin (COO) information in evaluating the quality of the Chinese-brand EVs (CBEVs) made-in various countries. Researchers suggest that consumers use COO as an information cue when evaluating a product, particularly if they lack detailed knowledge of the product. The results show that the perceived product quality of electric vehicles made in various countries influences consumers’ purchasing behavior. The study also found that consumers’ ethnocentrism has an effect on their buying behavior. Keywords Electric vehicles · Chinese-brand · Country-Of-Origin · Ethnocentric
1.1 Introduction Researchers have found how driving an electric vehicle (EV) can produce substantially lower emissions than a petrol or diesel car. According to the International Energy Agency, the total number of EVs in the global market surpassed three million in 2017. Of one million EVs sold in 2017, more than half of global sales were in China. China has a strong leadership position in the EV industry (Perkowski 2018). However,
K. Chinen (B) · Y. S. Han California State University, Sacramento, USA e-mail: [email protected] H. Endo Nihon Fukushi University, Mihama, Japan M. Matsumoto National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ibaraki, Japan © Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 Y. Kishita et al. (eds.), EcoDesign and Sustainability II, Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6775-9_1
3
4
K. Chinen et al.
“Chinese EVs are still several years behind the global leaders in terms of technologies” (Schmidt 2018). The purpose of this study is to examine the US consumers’ reliance on Country-Of-Origin (COO) information in evaluating the quality of the Chinese-brand EVs (CBEVs) made-in various countries. China contributes to approximately 65% of the US trade deficits in 2017. This trade imbalance led to the US-China trade war in 2018. Therefore, the attitudes and opinions of the US consumers towards China and its products, directly and indirectly, may influence demand for products of Chinese-brand products or products made in China. The US President Trump’s campaign in tweeting and preaching China’s unfair policies does not help improve China’s country image. It is very important for China to know its product image in foreign markets, particularly in the US. This research is timely because Chinese companies are reported to open stores focusing on sales of EVs in the US market as early as 2019. Despite the length of exposure to “Made-in China” products and significant demand observed for Chinese products in the US market, previous studies show that the image of “Made-in China” is stereotyped. The outline of this paper is as follows. First, we state the theoretical background and research questions. Second, we examine the methodology used to conduct our investigation. Third, we present the results of the data analysis and hypotheses testing. Fourth, we summarize the research findings and discuss both practical implications. In the last section, we conclude and investigate possible avenues for future research.
1.2 Literature Review Past studies find that COO provides an important informational cue in consumers’ evaluations of products and have empirically demonstrated country equity in their studies (Heslop and Papadopoulos 1993). With the increasing economic interdependence of national economies across the world, production occurs sequentially across multiple countries. Multiple countries of origin may have confused consumers in identifying the actual origin of the product. Jaffe and Nebenzahl (2006) state that “companies often ignore the country image effect altogether, treating the world as a single market and source of products” (Jaffe and Nebenzahl 2006). They warn the tendency of making sourcing decisions “based on comparative advantage and cost differentials only, to the exclusion of image considerations” (Jaffe and Nebenzahl 2006).
1.2.1 Product Quality, Perceived Benefits, and Perceived Risks Cross-national studies of the perceptions of “Made in” images are important because of their managerial implications for global and multinational companies. International marketers, marketing scholars, economists, and politicians understand that
1 The Chinese-Brand Electric Vehicles in the Eyes …
5
image of a country where a product is made is essential because the COO of a product influences product evaluations and purchase decisions; consumers tend to infer the quality of a country’s products from its national image (Heslop and Papadopoulos 1993). We formulate the following hypothesis: H1a: Perceived product quality positively influence the purchase intention of the CBEVs. In general, people are aware of damage to the environment and going green is a social norm. The electrification, or powered by electricity, will lead to a significant amount of reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and a decreased dependence on crude oil (Barbarossa et al. 2015). The EVs offer an advantage to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, and vehicular noise. We establish the following hypothesis: H1b: Perceived benefits positively influence the purchase intention of the CBEVs. In general, researchers find that high perceived risk and low perceived quality of green products are both negatively associated with consumers’ purchasing behavior (Matsumoto et al. 2018). Morton et al. (2016) examine environmental concerns and report how consequences of car use, self-reported responsibility and willingness to pay to reduce emissions are associated with attitudes towards EVs (Morton et al. 2016). People who consider their cars to be in their everyday life may have negative attitudes towards EVs (Morton et al. 2016). People still see risks and concerns about EVs regard a limited driving distance, time required to recharge, and a limited number of charging stations. Therefore, we have set forth the following hypothesis: H1c: Perceived risks negatively influence the purchase intention of the CBEVs.
1.2.2 China’s Economic Success In 2015, the Chinese government launched “Made in China 2025”, a state-led strategic industrial policy that seeks to make China dominant in global hightech manufacturing, including, but not limited to, electric and new energy (e.g., hydrogen-fuel cell) vehicles as well as artificial intelligence. For the US, the China’s industrial policy “undermine[s] Beijing’s stated adherence… to international trade rules, leading President Donald J. Trump to levy tariffs on Chinese goods and block several Chinese-backed acquisitions of technology firms” (McBride 2018). Regarding China’s trade practices, Trump has been tweeting and preaching his ‘fair’ business doctrine, particularly to his US supporters: If the U.S. sells a car into China, there is a tax of 25%… The days of the U.S. being ripped-off by other nations is OVER! (Sept 9, 2018)
6
K. Chinen et al. … I am a Tariff Man. When people or countries come into raid the great wealth of our Nation, I want them to pay for the privilege of doing so…MAKE AMERICA RICH AGAIN (Dec 4, 2018).
The COO image inaugurates US consumer’s beliefs and perceptions about attributes of EVs, and in turn, these beliefs affect their attitudes and inferences about product quality towards the CBEVs. Therefore, we formulated the following hypotheses: H2a: In evaluating the CBEVs made in China and advanced countries, the high-ethnocentric US consumers are likely to perceive the product quality made in foreign countries to be inferior to those who are low-ethnocentric consumers. H2b: The low-ethnocentric US consumers are willing to purchase the CBEVs made in China and advanced countries than those who are high-ethnocentric consumers.
1.3 Methodology 1.3.1 Respondents The online and paper-and-pencil surveys were anonymous and self-administered. We ensured confidentiality and promoted confidence in providing sensitive information accurately. No personal information was sufficient to identify any participants. A total of 188 business students from a major university in Sacramento, California, completed surveys. Ten observations from the 188 respondents had to be removed because of missing information. It is important to acknowledge that the survey sample was not randomly selected. Research indicates that paper-and-pencil and Internet data collection methods generally produce equivalent results (Weigold et al. 2013). Moreover, anonymous online surveys have the advantage to yield significantly lower social desirability scores than non-anonymous or face-to-face surveys (Dodou and de Winter 2014). The topic of the survey was announced as a survey on “opinions of consumers on electric vehicles” without explicitly referring to sustainability iss