124 86 10MB
English Pages 452 [455] Year 2016
Annals of Mathematics Studies Number 79
DISCONTINUOUS GROUPS AND RIEMANN SURFACES Proceedings o f the 1973 Conference at the University o f Maryland
EDITED BY LEON GREENBERG
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS AND UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO PRESS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 1974
Copyright © 1974 by Princeton University Press A L L RIGHTS RESERVED
L.C. Card: 73-16783 ISBN: 0-691-08138-7
Published in Japan exclusively by University of Tokyo Press; in other parts of the world by Princeton University Press
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data will be found on the last printed page of this book.
PR EFACE
This volume contains almost all of the papers that were read at the Conference on Discontinuous Groups and Riemann Surfaces, which was held at the University of Maryland during May 21-25, 1973.
The conference
was the third of a sequence of conferences on this subject in recent years. The other two were held at Tulane University (1965) and SUNY at Stony Brook (1969).
The Proceedings of the Stony Brook Conference appeared
as Advances in the Theory of Riemann Surfaces (Annals Study 66). Thanks are due the National Science Foundation for supporting the con ference; the University of Maryland for making its facilities available; the Princeton University P re ss for assuring rapid publication; and of course the participants of the conference for creating the mathematics contained herein.
L. GREENBERG
v
C O N TE N TS
P r e f a c e ..........................................................................................................
v
Constructability and Bers Stability of Kleinian Groups by William A bikoff ................................................................................
3
Algebraic Curves and H alf-canonical Linear Series by Robert D. M. A c c o la ........................................................
13
Sufficient Conditions for Quasi-conformal Extension by Lars V. Ahlfors ...............................................................................
23
Fundamental Domains for Kleinian Groups by A. F. Beardon ..................................................................................
31
Spaces of Degenerating Riemann Surfaces by Lipman B ers ....................................................................................
43
Mapping C la s s Groups of Surfaces: A Survey by Joan S. Birm an..................................................................................
57
A Note on L 2(T G) by Su-shing Chen ..................................................................................
73
On the Outradius of Finite-dim ensional Teichmiiller Spaces by T. C h u ................................................................................................
75
Some Direct Lim its o f Prim itive Homotopy Words and of Markoff G eodesics by Harvey C ohn......................................................................................
81
On the Caratheodory Metric in Teichmiiller Spaces by Clifford J. E arle ..............................................................................
99
Some Refinements o f the Poincare' Period Relation by L . Ehrenpreis and H. M. Farkas .................................................... 105 Remarks on Automorphisms of Compact Riemann Surfaces by Hershel M. F a rk a s ............................................................................ 121
viii
CONTENTS
The Structure of P S L ~ (R ); R, the Ring of Integers in a Euclidean Quadratic Imaginary Number Field by Benjamin F i n e .................................................................................. 145 Quasi-conformal Mappings and L eb e sg u e Density by F. W. Gehring and J. C. K e lly ........................................................ 171 On the Moduli of Compact Riemann Surfaces with a Finite Number of Punctures by Jane G ilm a n ...................................................................................... 181 Maximal Groups and Signatures by Leon G re e n b e rg ................................................................................ 207 Commensurable Groups of Moebius Transformations by Leon G re e n b e rg ................................................................................ 227 Chabauty Spaces of Discrete Groups by William H arvey .................................................................................. 239 Monodromy Groups and Linearly Polymorphic Functions by Dennis A. H e jh a l.............................................................................. 247 C ollars on Riemann Surfaces by Linda K een ........................................................................................ 263 Deformations of Certain Complex Manifolds by Garo K. Kiremidjian ........................................................................ 269 On the A (T ) C B (T ) Conjecture for Infinitely Generated Groups by Joseph L e h n e r .................................................................................. 283 The Fundamental Groups of Certain Subgroup Spaces by A. M. Macbeath ................................................................................ 289 Modular Groups and F iber Spaces over Teichmiiller Spaces by C. Maclachlan .................................................................................. 297 Universal Properties of Fuchsian Groups in the Poincare Metric by Albert Marden.................................................................................... 315 Remarks on Complex Multiplication and Singular Riemann Matrices by Henrik H. Martens ............................................................................ 341 Intersections of Component Subgroups o f Kleinian Groups by Bernard Maskit ................................................................................ 349 Polynomial Approximation in the B ers Spaces by Thomas Metzger and Mark Sheingorn ........................................... 369
CONTENTS
ix
Simple Illustrations o f the U s e s of E xplicit Computation of Theta Constants by Harry E. Rauch ................................................................................ 379 On the Relation between L o c a l and Global Properties of Boundary V alu es for Extremal Quasi-conformal Mappings by Edgar R e ic h ........................................................................................ 391 Symmetric Embeddings of Riemann Surfaces by Reto A. R u e d y .................................................................................. 409 On the Trajectory Structure of Quadratic Differentials by Kurt Strebel ...................................................................................... 419 The Maximal Inscribed B a ll of a Fuchsian Group by Jacob Sturm and Meir Shinnar ....................
439
DISCONTINUOUS GROUPS AND RIEMANN SURFACES
C O N S T R U C T A B IL IT Y A N D BERS
S T A B IL IT Y OF
K L E IN IA N G R O U PS William A bik off*
The study of small deformations of Kleinian groups was initiated by Poincare, who claimed without proof that a small deformation of a Fuchsian group results in a discontinuous group.
The deformations of surfaces of
finite Poincare area w as studied by Teichmiiller and he gave this deforma tion space a real analytic structure.
Later, Ahlfors and Bers used the
results of Teichmiiller, to parametrize the homotopy equivalence c la sse s of finite Riemann surfaces. It was, however, the beautiful result of Teichmiiller that there is an intimate tie between the deformations of a surface and the bounded quadratic differentials that live on that surface.
Ahlfors
finiteness theorem yields the fact that the quotient of the set of discon tinuity Q (G )
of a finitely generated Kleinian group by the group
finite union of conformally finite Riemann surfaces.
G
is a
It therefore becomes
relevant to consider whether each small deformation of a finitely generated Kleinian group may be induced by deformations of the quotient fl(G )/ G , or, more specifically, infinitesim ally by the bounded quadratic differentials on that quotient. of G
T h ese deformations are the quasi-conformal deformations
whose dilatation is supported on the ordinary set of G. Bers [4 ], Kra
[6 ], and Maskit [10] have studied these deformations and have woven an elegant theory of those quasi-conformal deformations of Kleinian groups. It is however not clear when all small type-preserving deformations of a finitely generated Kleinian group G
are induced by quasi-conformal defor
mations whose dilatation is supported on its ordinary set.
Such groups are
called Bers stable. *
R esearch partially supported by the N a tio n a l S cience Foundation.
3
4
WILLIAM ABIKOFF
Bers [3] first raised questions of stability in the study of B-groups, and proved that a finitely generated quasi-Fuchsian group is Bers stable. Gardiner and Kra [5] have derived a cohomological condition for Bers stability.
Marden [8] showed that a finitely generated Kleinian group with
out torsion is Bers stable if it is geometrically finite, i.e., has a finite sided Dirichlet region in the upper half-space. relationship between Bers
We w ill examine here the
stability and the construction algorithms
developed by Maskit and used by him to discover some of the deepest re sults in Kleinian group theory. been announced in [2],
Some of the results presented here have
The combination theorems as stated there have
not appeared in print but w ill appear shortly in M askit’s book. We w ill c a ll a group Maskit-constructible if it is finitely generated and may be constructed from cyclic groups using the Maskit algorithms.
The
principal results are:
THEOREM 1. A Maskit constructible finitely generated Kleinian group is Bers stable.
COROLLARY.
A totally degenerate group is not Maskit constructible
from cyclic groups.
Since constructibility is a topological property Theorem 1 has a strong er form, conjectured by Bers [4], namely
THEOREM 2.
Any quasi-conformation deformation of a Maskit constructi
ble group is Bers stable, i.e., is uniformly stable.
T hese theorems are direct consequences of Theorem 3 and 4.
In Sec
tion 3, we show
THEOREM 3.
If G
IS a finitely generated Kleinian group, formed by
application of Maskit Combination I to its subgroups both G j
and G2 are Bers stable, then G
Gj
and G 2, and
is Bers stable.
CONSTRUCTABILITY AND BERS STABILITY
5
Section 4 is devoted to the proof of
THEOREM 4.
If G
is a finitely generated Kleinian group which is
generated by a subgroup Combination II and G j
and an element y is Bers stable, then G
by application of Maskit is Bers stable.
We note that the statements of the combination theorems given in Sec tion 2 are not the most general given by Maskit. or H j
and
in Combination I
H2 in Combination II are non-elementary quasi-Fuchsian of
the second kind, the theorems remain valid. that Bers
If H
While it may be conjectured
stability is preserved in the above cases, the techniques given
here do not yield a proof.
No Kleinian groups known to this author are
constructible using the most general combination theorems and not con structible using the combination theorems as stated here. §1.
Kleinian groups and stability A Kleinian group is a discrete subgroup of the Mobius group = Jfi = / z t-> — —k | a, b, c, d, e C, ad-bc = 1, z e C L ( cz+d
which acts discontinuously at some point of C
and which is neither
trivial nor a finite extension of a cyclic group.
If 11(G) is the subset of
C
on which the Kleinian group
the set of discontinuity of G. G
is elementary if A (G )
G
acts discontinuously,
A (G ),
the limit set of G,
has le ss than three points.
H (G ) is
is called
C — H (G ).
We define the pro-
jection map 77 = 77q
11(G) -> i2^G V G •
A ll groups considered here have finite quotient, i.e.,
Vq
is a
finite union of conformally finite Riemann surfaces. A Kleinian group domain B
G
is called quasi-Fuchsian if there is a Jordan
so that y (B ) = B
for a ll y e G.
A (G ) = (9B and of the second kind otherwise.
It is of the first kind if We say that Q j
is a
6
WILLIAM ABIKOFF
component of G
if f lj
is a component of £2(G).
stability subgroup of A, y (A ) = A.
If
C —
denoted
then the
is the set of those y e G
is a component of G,
then J = dQ>1 H
tor for G
G^
If A C C,
and O j j
so that
is a component of
1 is a quasi-circle and is called a separa
(se e Abikoff [1 ]).
A subset F
of fl(G )
is called a fundamental set for G GF =
U
if,
y (F ) 3 Q (G )
ye G
and F fl y F = 0 If f : C -» C for G
for y e G — H.
If G
for
has finite quotient then
7
CONSTRUCTABILITY AND BERS STABILITY
we claim
H is trivial, cyclic or a finitely generated quasi-Fuchsian group
of the first or second kind.
Since
is either a subset of A (G )
or J fl 12(G) is contained in a single com
ponent of 12(G).
In the first case
B f) A (G ) =
J is a separator and in the latter case,
the image of J fl 12(G) in (B )
, it follow s that J = d B
0
is a finite set of disjoint simple loops.
is a topologically finite (p ossibly ramified) surface.
77
now coalesce.
The two cases
If J is a separator then H is finitely generated as is
shown in [1],
Otherwise
H
is the cover group of a planar cover of a
finite surface, hence is finitely generated.
It must be either elementary or
quasi-Fuchsian of the second kind by Marden [7] and Maskit [9]. §2.
The Maskit combination theorems The combination theorems are techniques for building a Kleinian group
from simpler groups. group
Combination I gives a geometric condition that a
G be describable as a free product of two groups
with amalgamated common subgroup
H.
Hj
and G 2
Combination II gives such a con
dition for adjoining a transformation y a subgroup
G^^
to a group
of GQ into a subgroup
G Q which conjugates
H 2. We proceed to state the
theorems.
2.1 C o m b i n a t i o n T h e o r e m I. with a common subgroup H,
G x and G 2
Let
and B 1
and B 2
be Kleinian groups
precisely invariant discs
under H with J = d B j = 2.
(T p
could just as w e ll stand for T orelli space or the Jacobian locus of the Siegel upper half sp ace.) Hp be the locus in Tp the dimension of Hp is 2).
The (com plex) dimension of Tp
is
3p — 3. L et
corresponding to hyperelliptic surfaces.
is
2p — 1;
Then
that is, the codimension of Hp
in Tp
p — 2. Riemann surface admitting a g *(2 ) We first consider a Riemann surface,
F p _ 1 where the
Wp,
admitting a plane model
g (2 ,p —1) cut out by the lines of
By formula (1 ) d = (p —1) (p —6)/2
since
n = p — 1.
P 2 is half-canonical. It follow s that the
g (2 ,p —1) is half-canonical if and only if there is an adjoint of degree p —6, f p _ 6 [4]. divisor.
Thus, if L
is a line then f p _ 6L 2 cuts out a canonical
We give three examples.
(i)
p= 6; g*(2 , 5).
F 5 is a non-singular plane quintic.
(ii)
p= 7, g * (2 ,6 ).
F 6 has three collinear nodes.
9
9
F 4 F j — F^ (iii)
has nodes where
p= 9, g*(2 , 8). example,
Fg
F 1 and
For example,
F 3 intersect.
has twelve nodes lying on a cubic.
F 2 Fg — F 2. But for this example the given
For g * (2 ,8 )
is not complete. L et g *(r).
G * (r )
be the locus in Tp
of surfaces admitting a complete
We w ill now try to compute the dimensions of the various compo
nents of G *(2 ).
Let
simple
A s a guess we give
g * (2 )’s.
component of
G * (2 )
G *(2 )
be the components ofG *(2 )
G *(2 )
is the locus in
df) ... = ^ - ( e ; B ) = 0 for some half period
%
an argument thatindicates that each
may have codimension three in Tp.
may seem surprising since
containing the
This result
Tp where
- (e; B ) =
^ e where 6 has odd order. Thus
the codimension, three, is considerably le ss than p, tions defining the locus in terms of the theta function.
the number of equa
ROBERT D. M. ACCOLA
16
If we first consider
F
^s
with
( p - l ) ( p - 6 ) / 2 (=d) nodes, but with
no restriction on the position of the nodes, then Severi’s result gives the dimension of this family of curves to be the nodes to lie on a
(p —1) (p+2)/2 — d.
Since we wish
f p _ 6 , the number of degrees of freedom for the
nodes is reduced by d — (p —6) (p —3)/2;
for the first
(p —6 )(p —3)/2
nodes
determine f p _ 6 and the remaining nodes have but one degree of freedom since they must lie on the f p _ 6 so determined. F p _ i ’s
Thus the family of
with d nodes on a fp_ 6 has dimension
(p—l)(p + 2 )/ 2 — d —
(d — (p—6) (p—3)/2) = 3p + 2.
Since every Riemann surface has at most
a finite number of
the dimension of G *(2 ) w ill be
g * (2 )’s,
3p + 2
minus the dimension, eight, of the groups of collincations of P 2. Thus we guess that G *(2 ) has dimension
3p — 6 ( = dim Tp — 3).
The method of arriving at the guess furnishes a proof only for p = 6, 7 and 8.
For
p = 9 the twelve nodes may not be chosen arbitrarily on a
f3; only eleven can be chosen arbitrarily.
The guess has been verified
for p = 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The guess does not really deserve the status of a conjecture since there is some counter evidence. G *(3 )
of different dimensions.
For
p = 10 there are two components of
A lso for p = 6 there is a question of the
dimension of a ll components of G *(2 ). Wp e G *(2 )
and
(ii) every
For a
W6 is hyperelliptic if and
only if
(i)
g *(2 )
G *(2 ).
But it is not clear, at least to the author, whether or not each com
ponent of H6 is a component of G *(2 )
is composite.
Thus
H6 C
or whether H6 is in G *(2 ).
If
the former case held, then those components of G *(2 ) — G *(2 ) would have codimension 4,
the known codimension of Hg
Of course, for p = 5, codimension three in Tg. 3).
in Tg.
G *(2 ) = H 5, so all components of G *(2 ) A lso every
g *(2 )
have
on a W5 is composite.
Syzygetic families of half-canonical linear series
D E F IN IT IO N .
Let
order 2 ^ (0 < V < p).
G be a subgroup of the half-periods of J(W ) A coset,
H,
of G
of
in the half-periods of J(Wp)
w ill be called a syzygetic coset if the orders of vanishing of 0(u; B )
at
the points of H all have the same parity (odd or even).
2^
If there are
ALGEBRAIC CURVES AND LINEAR SERIES
complete
g *(r^ )’s
on Wp, i = 1,2,
17
> 0; r- = rj (mod 2),
sponding to the points of H then the
g * (r p js
corre
w ill be called a syzygetic
family. For example, any complete family of order one and
(V = 0).
w ill be considered a syzygetic
g*^ )
and
g *(r2)
are distinct, complete,
rj = r2 (mod 2) then they form a syzygetic family of order two ( V = l ) .
g *(r-), i = 1, 2, 3, 4, (i)
If
g *(r)
w ill form a syzygetic family of order four (V = 2) if
they are distinct and complete,
(iii)
if
(ii)
is an arbitrary divisor from
Di + D2 + D3 + D ,
= r2 = r3 = r4 (mod 2), g * (r j)
and
we have that the divisor
is bicanonical.
Riemann surfaces admitting automorphisms of period two (involutions) usually admit extraordinary syzygetic fam ilies.
Our purpose in this s e c
tion and the next is to exhibit Riemann surfaces as plane curves which admit syzygetic fam ilies but which do not admit obvious involutions. 3.0. V = 0; g *(p / 3 ),s : A theorem due essen tially to Castelnuovo [3] asserts that
g *(r, p—1) is composite for
r> 2
if p < 3r:
If 3 1p a
problem arises of exhibiting Riemann surfaces admitting a simple For
p = 6 and
g *(4 )
p = 9 the examples given in Section 2) suffice.
on a W12 can be exhibited by considering a
ordinary triple point.
g*(p/3). A simple
F 7 with a single
Conics through the triple points cut out a
g *(4 )
since sp ecial adjoints are quartics with double points at the triple point of Fy.
Similarly, arbitrary conics cut out a
F ? (p = 15). genera
g *(5 )
on a non-singular
In a sim ilar manner examples can be constructed for higher
p where
3|p.
Now we ask whether the existence of a simple p lies the existence of such a plane model. simple
g * (2 )
model.
For
For
g *(p /3 )
on Wp im
p = 6 the existence of a
im plies, by definition, a non-singular plane quintic for a p = 9 the existence of a simple
whose equation is shows that the
g * (3 )
implies a plane model
F^ F 2 — F 4. The method of Castelnuovo’s theorem
g *(3 )
gives a space model for W9 which is the complete
ROBERT D. M. ACCOLA
18
intersection of a quadric and quartic surface.
Then eliminating one vari
able (projecting from a point not on the quadric) gives an equation of a plane curve of the indicated form. 3.1.
V = 1; two g * ((p —2 )/3 )’s : By an extension of the theorem of
Castelnuovo cited above in subsection 3.0 a Riemann surface of genus cannot admit two simple
g * (r )’s
amples of plane curves of genus g * ((p —2 )/ 3 )’s If A
A , B, C,
ear.
L et
P
point where For
Ex
p = 2 + 3r admitting two simple
are now given.
and B
Let
for p — 2 < 3r (p = 4 is excluded).
p
are points of
and D
and
L BD
with ordinary triple points at P lines through Q cuts out a
half-canonical.
be the line connecting them.
Lq
L AB
and
L CD
meet and let
Q be the
meet.
p = 5 consider a curve
special adjoint if
L AB
be four points of P 2 no three of which are collin-
be the point where L AC
P 2 let
F 7 with nodes at A, B, C, and Q
g (l,4 )
(formula (1 )).
on F ?. Since
La
P
D
and
The pencil of ^C D ^Q
b
is a line through Q we see that this
Similarly, the lines through
and
cut out a
*s a
g (l,4 )
g * (l).
is
It can be
shown that every Riemann surface of genus five without involutions admit ting two For
g * ( l ) ’s
p = 8 consider
points at B conics,
admits such a plane model [2].
and
C
P , Q,
adjoint and so the F 2 ’s
3.2.
and
with nodes at A
and D,
and ordinary four points at P
F 2 , through
through P , Q
Fg
and B.
cut out a
Then
g *(2 )
and
ordinary triple Q.
Consider
L AC L CD F 2 *s a s Pe c ^a ^
on F 7. Similarly for conics
C.
V = 2; four g * ((p —3 )/ 3 )’s : By an extension of the theorem of
Castelnuovo cited above in subsection 3.0, a surface of genus
p cannot
admit a syzygetic family of four simple
Examples
g * (r )’s
for 3r > p — 3.
are now given to show this bound is sharp. U sin g the notation of 3.1 let
R be the point where
meet, that is, the third diagonal point for the quadrangle
L AD
and
L BC
A, B, C, D.
ALGEBRAIC CURVES AND LINEAR SERIES
19
Consider
F g with ordinary triple points at A, B, C ,
and D
at P , Q,
and
is a line passing
through A of such C
R.
p = 6 (formula (1)).
fj
then L BC L CD L BD L A
L a ’s
and D
Then
cut out a
g * (l)
If L A
and nodes
is a special adjoint and so the pencil
on F g . U sing analogous notation for B,
we see that
l a l b l c l d l ab
l ac
l ad
l bc
l bd
l cd
is a double adjoint and so the sum of the four linear series is bicanonical. It can be shown that a W6 without involutions admitting a syzygetic family of four
g * ( l ) ’s
admits such a plane model.
Consider a F 10 with ordinary four points at A, B, C nodes at and D. out a
P, Q, Then
g *(2 )
and R.
Then
L A B L A C L AD
p = 9.
Let F A
is a sp ecial
D
be aconic through adjoint so the
and B, C
F A ’s cut
on F 1Q. Since
f a f b f c f d l ab
l ac
l ad
l bc
is a double adjoint, the sum of the four g * (2 )’s 4).
and
l bd
l cd
is bicanonical.
Construction of more general syzygetic families We now give a more general procedure for producing plane curves
which have fairly obvious syzygetic fam ilies. for V = 1 and Let
k and
A ll the previous examples
2 are sp ecial cases of this procedure. t be positive integers with k > t.
ducible plane curve with
t tacnodes at points
which are collinear.
L ^ .^ L j.
Let
Let
F ^+4
be an irre
P 1, P 2 , ...,P^.
no three of
be the t tacnodal tangents and sup
pose they are distinct and all meet in a single point Q. has an ordinary k-fold singularity at Q.
Suppose
Since each tacnode contributes
two to d of formulas (1 ) and (2) we have (3) (4)
F ^ +4
d = 2t + k(k—1)/2 and
so
2p — 2 = (k + 4 ) ( k + l ) - 4t - k ( k - l ) = 6 k - 4 t + 4
ROBERT D. M. ACCOLA
20
Special adjoints have degree
k+1
and must be tangent to L j
addition to the usual condition at Q. must consider separately the cases
at P j
in
In the following computations we
k even and odd although the final
results are the same for both cases. Suppose the
(2 s )
l x, l
k is odd.
Pick an integer
possible ways, choose
2, ...,
l
2 s . Then
( k + 1 — 2s)/2.
2s
s
so that 0 < 2s < t.
of the lines
f ( k + i _ 2s)/2
g (R ,N )
k+1
if m =
Pa sse s through P 2 s + l , , , , , P t and
has a (k — 1 — 2s)/2-fold singularity at Q. a sp ecial adjoint.
say
r\
L 1 L 2 . . . L 2 s fm w ill have degree
Suppose
In one of
Then
The “ free points’ ’ of such
L ^ L ^ .-L g f^
fm’s
w ill be
cut out on
a
where
N = (k + 4 )(k + 1 — 2s)/2 - 2 ( t - 2 s ) -
k (k -l-2 s )/ 2
= p -
1
and R > (k + 1 — 2 s )(k + 7 — 2s)/8 - ( t - 2 s ) -
( k - 1 - 2 s )(k + 1 - 2s)/8
or R > k - t+ 1 . Thus such
f (k + i -2 s )/ 2 s
choices of 2s
cut out
(2 s ) g * (R )’s.
of the lines we get 2 *~ 1 f = ^
be shown to form a syzygetic family. R = k — 1+1 For
for a ll the
k even and
lines, say adjoint if
Considering all
( 2 s ) ) g * (R )’s
which can
It is to be expected that in general
g * (R )’s.
s
chosen so that 0 < 2s
L,1, L 2, ..., L 2s+1. Then m = (k — 2s)/2,
a
r\
2s + 1
b 1 L 2 ... L 2s+1 fm w ill be a special
fm passes through P 2s+2> •••> P t anc* ^m ^as
a ( k — 2s — 2)/2-fold singularity at Q. again cut out on F ^ +4
+ 1 < t,choose
The “ free points” of such
g *(R ), R > k —1+1, and
syzygetic family of order 2*-1
^
(2s + 1)^
fm’s
so we again obtain
a
.
There remains, of course, the problem of the actual existence of irre ducible algebraic curves scribed singularities. if for any t+ 1
points
F ^ +4
of genus
p = 3k — 2t + 3 having the pre
C a ll a pair of integers ...,P ^ ,Q ,
(t, k), k > t > 0, admissible
no three of which are collinear,
ALGEBRAIC CURVES AND LINEAR SERIES
21
there exists an irreducible algebraic plane curve
F ^ +4
of genus
p =
3k — 2t + 3 having the prescribed singularities.
By using Bertini’s
theorem (concerning irreducible curves in a linear family of curves) and other standard methods we can obtain the follow ing results about adm issi ble pairs: (1 )
(t, t + w )
(2 ) If (t, k) Now set
is adm issible if
t < 13 + 5w (w > 0)
is adm issible so is
(t, k + 1).
V = t — 1 for the follow ing theorem.
THEOREM 1.
For integers
V, k so that (V + l , k )
exists a Riemann surface of genus family of 2 ^ g * (R )’s
is admissible, there
p = 3k — 2V + 1 admitting a syzygetic
where each R > k — V.
The c ases considered in subsection 3.1 occur when V = 1 and or 3.
k= 2
One transforms the curves derived in Theorem 1 by a standard quad
ratic transformation with fundamental points at the two tacnodes and at any third non-singular point of F j ^ . 3.2 occur when
V = 2 and
The cases considered in subsection
k = 3 or 4.
One transforms
by a
standard quadratic transformation with the fundamental points at the three tacnodes. The methods used for the above constructions can be considerably ex tended by considering singularities of F on each line
L
where several tacnodes occur
and/or more complicated tacnodes occur on each
restriction on adm issible pairs
(t, k)
L.
The
given in (1 ) immediately preceding
the statement of Theorem 1 seems inherent in the method of construction but hardly seems inherent in the nature of things.
N evertheless, the
above constructions give a sharpness for the follow ing generalization of Castelnuovo’s theorem which subsumes a ll the sp ecial instances cited in Section 3).
We omit the proof [1].
22
ROBERT D. M. ACCOLA
THEOREM 2.
For
V = 1, 2,
or 3 and any k > V ,
a surface of genus
p < 3k — 2V -i- 1 admitting a syzygetic family of g *(k —V ) ’s must admit an involution and either no
g *(k —V )
of order 2^
of the syzygetic family
is simple or Wp is hyper elliptic.
Castelnuovo’s theorem and its extension can also be used to show that all
R ’s
of Theorem 1 are equal to k — V
namely
V = 1, 2, 3,
and
for low values of V,
4.
UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER AND BROWN UNIVERSITY
REFERENCES
[1].
A ccola, Robert D. M., Vanishing properties of theta functions for abelian covers of closed Riemann surfaces.
[2].
Part III (to appear).
A ccola, Robert D. M., Some loci of Teichmiiller space for genus five defined by vanishing theta-nulls (to appear).
[3].
Castelnuovo, G., Sur multipli du una serie lineare di gruppi di punti. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Vol. VIII (1893), pp. 89-110.
[4].
Kraus, Note iiber ausgewohnlicke Specialgruppen auf algebraischen Curven.
[5].
Mathematischen Annalen Vol. XVI (1880), p. 310.
Severi-Loffler, Vorlesunger iiber algebraische Geometrie, L e ip z ig 1921 (C h elsea).
S U F F IC IE N T C O N D IT IO N S F O R Q U A S I-C O N F O R M A L E X T E N S IO N Lars V. A h lfors*
1.
A locally homeomorphic mapping of a sphere into itse lf is automatically
a homeomorphism.
This simple topological fact can be used to prove that
a function on a subregion is schlicht.
Indeed, it w ill be schlicht if it can
be extended to a locally homeomorphic mapping of the whole sphere.
The
easiest way to show that a mapping is locally homeomorphic is to show that the Jacobian is
^ 0.
This w ill be so if the mapping f
satisfies
fz ^ 0 and
(D
I%l < H f z l
for some k < 1.
Hence the importance of quasi-conformal extensions.
To be specific, suppose that f satisfies (1) together with fz ^ 0 in A == \\z\ < 1}.
If k < k '< 1,
extended to a k '—q.c.
under what additional conditions can
mapping of the Riemann sphere?
f be
The question
may be regarded as consisting of two parts: 1) When does there exist a of A * = { \z\ > 1! such that f to
k -q .c. and
f*
locally homeomorphic mapping f* have equal continuous extensions
\z\ = 1. 2) If f and f *
have this property, when do they together form a
locally homeomorphic mapping of the sphere, and hence a
k -q .c .
homeo
morphism of the sphere on itself. There are some trivial answers to the second question. if f and
f*
disks
and A * ,
*
A
For instance,
extend to locally homeomorphic mappings of the closed then they determine a global homeomorphism.
R esearch partially supported under N S F Grant GP-38886.
23
More
LARS V. AHLFORS
24
refined results would be interesting, but seem to be difficult to come by. At present the best method is to approximate f n with good boundary behavior that allow
f by a sequence of functions
kn-q.c.
extensions
ffl*.
If
kn -» k' it is p ossible to extract a subsequence which converges to a k '—q.c. 2.
extension of the original f.
Not much generality is lost by assuming that k = 0 or, in other words,
that f is conformal.
Indeed, by the general existence theorem for quasi-
conformal mapping there exists a q.c.
homeomorphism h of the sphere
on itself that preserves symmetry with respect to the unit circle and sa tis fies
h^-/hz = fz /fz
in A .
This means that f ° h_1
and if f has a quasi-conformal extension so does
is conformal in A , f o h- 1 , and vice
versa. Of course, since less tractable.
h is not explicitly known, the general case remains
It is therefore le ss by choice than of necessity that we
limit ourselves to the discussion of holomorphic f. has a 3.
k-q.c.
If a holomorphic f
extension to the sphere we shall say that f is
Two separate sufficient conditions are known.
W eill [1] proved that f (2)
k-schlicht.
In 1962 Ahlfors and
is k-schlicht if its Schwarzian derivative sa tisfies |{f,z}| ( l - | z | 2) 2 < 2k .
This result has been important for the theory of Teichmiiller spaces and Kleinian groups.
In 1972 Becker [2] proved the sufficiency of the condition
(3 )
|zf7f'| ( l - | z | 2) < k .
This w as an improvement on a result by Duren, Shapiro, and Shields [3]. Actually, Becker proves much more.
Under the condition (2 ) or (3 ) he
shows that f is the initial link in a chain of subordinate schlicht func tions.
This leads to a Lowner-type differential equation and to more
intrinsic proofs than by the original method.
In this paper we do not pur
sue this interesting aspect, but we prove the following generalizations of conditions (2) and (3).
25
QUASI-CONFORMAL EXTENSION
THEOREM.
In order that f
(A )
be k-schlicht it is sufficient that either
z p ( l - | z | 2) + c|z|2| < k
for some complex constant c (B )
| j f f , z i ( 1 - |z|2) 2 -
c ( l - c ) z 2| < k |c|
|c —11 < k.
with
Note that (2) is (B ) with 4.
with |c| < k, or that
c = 1,
and (3 ) is (A ) with
c = 0.
We proceed directly to the proof, but under the preliminary condition
that f is holomorphic on the closed disk A .
It is convenient to define
the extension in the form (f(z ) = ;
f (z )
(g (l/ z ) where If we
g is sense reversing
and
for
|z| < 1
for
|z| > 1
k-q.c.
in
A withg = f
set g = f + uthe boundarv condition
is
on {|z| = l }.
u = 0,and thequasi-
conformality is expressed by (3 )
|f'+ uz | < k |Ug-1 .
In addition we require that
0 in A
and that u is sufficiently regu
lar, for instance real-analytic on
|z| = 1.
evident that F
homeomorphic extension of f.
w ill be a k-q.c.
In these circumstances it is
Nothing prevents us from making u dependent on f.
If we choose
u = i '/ o condition (3) becomes (4)
and
| x l > x2 >
The closed region
•
D n bounded by the Euclidean polygon with vertices
x n’ xn+l ’ x n+l + i/xn +lplaced by its image
xn " °
1 + i/xn+l>
Hn(D n).
1 + i/xn- x n + i/xn’ xn may be re*
If this is done for a ll
mental domain for G which has
n we obtain a funda
z = 1 as the only limit point on its
boundary and this is not a parabolic fix-point.
40
A. F. BEARDON
F inally we remark that, as we have seen, locally finite.
D
may be convex but not
Example 1 shows that this is so and in this case
has genus one.
A */ G
The author can prove that in the case of the Modular
group (and certain other groups) any convex fundamental domain is neces sarily locally finite.
It remains an open question, however, as to whether
or not there exists a group A */ G §6.
G
has genus zero and (ii)
and a fundamental domain D D
such that (i)
is convex but not locally finite.
Kleinian groups Let
G be a Kleinian group with set of discontinuity fl.
a maximal inequivalent set of components of fl, subgroup of A j
and Dj
A parabolic fix-point ft/G:
let
Gj
Let A j
be
be the stability
a connected fundamental domain for Gj
in A j.
p is a cusp if it corresponds to a puncture on
then there are horocyclic neighborhoods of p lying in some image
of A j. It is evident that the preceding results are true in much greater gener ality than stated and that the proofs can easily be modified where neces sary.
We add (as u sual) the cusps to the A j
true for Dj
and the three theorems are
in A j.
The same arguments apply to finitely generated Kleinian groups. suppose that °o is a cusp whose stabilizer contains that H = {y > t!
n).
P : z -> z + 1 and
lies in A j : we suppose also that D- fl H can only
meet a finite number of sets of the form H fl P n V (D j) varying
We
With this supposition, if G
locally finite, then Dj
(for a fixed
is finitely generated and
is “ finite sid e d .’ ’
V and Dj
is
FUNDAMENTAL DOMAINS FOR KLEINIAN GROUPS
41
REFERENCES
[1].
Beardon, A. F ., and Maskit, B ., “ Limit points of Kleinian groups and finite sided fundamental polyhedra,” (unpublished).
[2].
Greenberg, L ., “ Fundamental polygons for Fuchsian g ro u p s/ ’ /. cVAnal. Math., 18 (1967), pp. 99-105.
[3].
H eins, M., “ Fundamental polygons of Fuchsian and Fuchsoid groups/ ’ Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., 1964, p. 30.
[4].
Marden, A ., “ On finitely generated Fuchsian gro u p s/ ’ Comment. Math. H elv., 42 (1967), pp. 81-85.
SPACES OF D E G E N E R A TIN G RIEMANN SU R FA C ES* Lipman Bers T h is is a prelim inary report on work in progress, prepared for the Maryland co n fe re n c e .**
P ro o fs w ill appear elsew h ere.
Since the manuscript is not com
pleted, I prefer to la b e l a ll statements of results conjectures.
The aim is to con
struct an alogu es of Teichm iiller sp a c e s for a lg e b ra ic curves which have or acquire ordinary double points.
§1.
RIEM ANN S U R F A C E S WITH N O D ES A Riemann surface with nodes,
such that every either to the set
S,
is a connected complex space
P e S has arbitrarily small neighborhoods isomorphic |z| < 1 in C
C 2. In the second case,
P
or to the set
|z| < 1,
is called a node.
complement of the nodes is called a part of S, singular) Riemann surface. sphere with
0,
|w| < 1,
zw = 0 in
Every component of the it is an ordinary (non
S is called exceptional if a part of S is a
1 or 2 punctures, or a torus with
0 or 1 punctures.
If S is non-exceptional, every part carries a canonical Poincare metric. If S is also compact, the Poincare"area of every part is a multiple of 2n, and the Poincare" area
A
of S is a multiple of 477. The genus
compact non-exceptional S is defined by the relation number k of nodes sa tisfie s the inequality 3p — 3 nodes, it is called terminal. finitely many terminal S,
A = 4z7(p—1);
0 < k < 3p — 3.
If S has
p.
with or without subscripts, denotes a com
pact non-exceptional Riemann surface with nodes, of a fixed genus denote by Mp the space of isomorphism classes of a ll such *
**
the
There are, up to isomorphisms, only
for a given
From now on the letter S,
p of a
Work partially supported by the N a tio n a l S cience Foundation.
p. We
S.
_
International Conferen ce on Riemann Surfaces and D iscontinuous Groups, U n iv e rsity of M aryland, C o lle g e Park, Maryland, May 21-25, 1973.
43
44
LIPMAN BERS
Let
q > 0 be an integer.
phic form of type
A regular q-differential on S is a holomor
(q, 0) on each part of S,
which has poles of order at
most q at the punctures, the “ residu es” at any two punctures joined in a node being equal (if
q is even) or opposite (if q is odd).
of a holomorphic form w
of type
(q, 0) at a point P
Riemann surface is the residue, at P , where z
[T h e residue
of a non-singular
of the Abelian differential w z^
is a local parameter with z = 0
at P .]
The number of linearly independent regular q-differentials is q = l
and
(2q—1) (p—1) for q > 1.
p for
Every b asis of regular q-differentials
defines a holomorphic (q -canonical) embedding of S into and exhibits
1dz,
P (2 q -l)(p -l)-l
S as a “ sta b le ” (in the sense of Mayer and Mumford) alge
braic curve with nodes, of arithmetic genus A continuous surjection
p.
f : Sj -> S w ill be called a deformation if the
image of a node is a node, the inverse image of a node is a node or a Jordan curve avoiding a ll nodes, and the restriction of
f
to the comple
ment of the inverse images o f the nodes is a sense preserving homeomor phism. We choose once and for all an integer throughout this paper.
Tw o deformations
v > 3;
it w ill remain fixed
fj : Sj -> S and f2 : S2 ->
be called equivalent if there exist a homeomorphism such that ^1 = ^2 °
g of Sj
onto
Sw ill S2
anc* & *s h ° motopic to a product of v-th powers of
Dehn twists about Jordan curves mapped by
f^ into nodes, follow ed by
an isomorphism. Note that a deformation which is not a homeomorphism increases the number of nodes.
A terminal
S admits no deformations except for iso
morphisms. §2. R IEM ANN S U R F A C E S WITH N O D E S A N D B O U N D A R IE S O F T E IC H M U L L E R S P A C E S Before describing our present approach, we report briefly on the con nection between Riemann surfaces with nodes and boundaries of T eich-
45
SPACES OF DEGENERATING RIEMANN SURFACES
miiller spaces. tinuity,
In this section, which may be omitted without lo ss of con
S denotes a non-singular Riemann surface,
and 77p its fundamental group.
S
its mirror image,
By a sense reversing deformation we mean
a deformation followed or preceded by the canonical mapping of a Riemann surface onto its mirror image. By the theorem on simultaneous uniformization, equivalence c la s s e s of sense reversing homeomorphic deformations
S -» S1 can be represented
by conjugacy c la sse s (in the Mobius group) of quasi-Fuchsian groups iso morphic to 77p, and by points of the Teichmiiller space that T (S )
T (S ).
It is known
is a complex manifold which admits a standard embedding as a
bounded domain in C 3P- 3 , viewed as the space of regular 2-forms on S , and that every boundary point if/ e 0 non-invariant non
conjugate components A j , . . . , A f with stability subgroups such that A q/G
is a non-singular Riemann surface
A r/G r are the parts of a Riemann surface
Sj
with
S
G j ,..., Gf ,
and A 1/ G 1,.. . ,
k > 0 nodes, two
punctures joined into a node corresponding to conjugate parabolic sub groups of G.
The group G
sing deformations
S ->
defines an equivalence c la ss of sense rever
.
The construction of regular b-groups representing a given sense re versing deformation is due to Maskit.
Maskit also showed that d T (S )
contains regular b-groups representing deformations of S
onto terminal
surfaces, and that such groups yield new, non-standard, embeddings of T (S )
into C 3P- 3 . Important recent results are due to Marden (who uses
three-dimensional topology), E arle and Marden, Abikoff (who relies on twodimensional and function-theoretical methods) and Harvey (who operates mainly within the framework of Fuchsian groups).
In view of their investi
46
LIPMAN BERS
gations, which are to appear, one knows that every regular b-group is in deed a boundary group, that is, occurs on the boundary of a Teichmiiller space, and that such a group is determined, up to a conjugacy in the Mobius group, by the equivalence c la ss of the corresponding deformation. One can extend the action of the modular group from T (S )
to the part of
(2T(S) consisting of regular b-groups. §3.
S P A C E S O F R IEM ANN S U R F A C E S WITH NODES We proceed to construct a complex domain parametrizing a ll Riemann
surfaces with nodes which can be deformed into a given surface
S,
sur
faces with nodes occurring not on the boundary but in the interior of this domain.
The construction depends on various choices, which w ill later
turn out to have been irrelevant, as w ill the complex structure of S, though not its topological structure. Let
S have
have genus
pj
r parts and
5 ^ ,...,^
and k nodes
nj punctures.
P ^ ...,? ^
L et
2j
Then
2k = n1 + ... + nf , p = p1 + ... + pf + k + 1 — r .
We choose
r Fuchsian groups
disjoint closures, such that Gj
G ^ .-.jG has
nj
acting on discs
non-conjugate maximal elliptic
subgroups, each of the same fixed order v > 3, A j/ G j,
A 1, . . . , A r with
the Riemann surface
with the images of a ll elliptic vertices removed, is conformally
equivalent to £ j,
and
G 1, . . . , G f generate a Kleinian group G which is
their free product and has an invariant component A Q such that A q/G a compact Riemann surface A q/G
2
of genus
being ramified over 2k points.
p1 + ... + p , the mapping A Q -> (Our conditions can be satisfied,
in view of the limit circle theorem of Klein and Poincare"and of K lein ’s combination theorem.) Now we assign to each node Pelliptic subgroups T '-, T"-
r\ C Gj
and T ".
C
Gg.
of G,
of S two non-conjugate maximal so that if
P-
joins
Xj
to 2g,
then
Two elliptic vertices, not in A Q, w ill be called
related if they are fixed under elliptic subgroups conjugate to either r ' j
is
47
SPACES OF DEGENERATING RIEMANN SURFACES
or to r ^ .
The T -
are chosen so that the union of the A j/ G j,
with the
images of any two related elliptic vertices identified, is isomorphic to S. If s i e C,
\s{ \ > 0 and sm all, then there exists a unique loxodromic
Mobius transformation group F ] , (j
g: c 1,
which conjugates the group T - into the 1
has multiplier s-,
and £ being as before).
and has fixed points in A j
Set s = ( s 1, . . . , s^).
small, let G Q g denote the group generated by with
Sj ^ 0.
If G
and Aj?
\s\ = max |s-|
is
and a ll elements
By M askit’s second combination theorem,
GQ g
g^ g ,
is a
Kleinian group. Let C
s
be as before, and let W be a quasi-conformal automorphism of
such that W leaves
and W|Aq is conformal.
0 ,1 , oo fixed, Then
WGQ SW_1
W|Aj, j = l , . . . , r ,
is a Kleinian group, defines an element rj
of the Teichmiiller space T (G -), which we represent as a bounded domain 3 p--3 +n : J in C J J. If 0, set tj = a* — a^ where a^ is the repelling fixed point of W °g : °W - 1 i,s* If s- = 0,
and
a-
1
the fixed point of
Wr'- W” 1 in A*. 1 j
set t- = 0. The point (7 ,t) = (r x,
tx , . . . , t k) r C 3p_3
determines the group WGQ SW—1 completely; we denote this group by Gf
andwe denote the set of all
fined by
Xa (S).
Here a
(r, t)
for which a group
represents the choices made:
Gf t is de
the groups
Gj
and the subgroups F '-, F "-. I.
Xa (S )
is a hounded domain in C 3P ~ 3 .
We denote by Qa (r ,t )
the part of the region of discontinuity of Gf ^
which does not map onto 2 , of the set of elliptic vertices. conjugation
G _ _ W G W- 1 O^o OjO
elliptic vertices in
and by &a( T, t) the complement in The images of the pair T '-,
under the
w ill be denoted by T 'T r, t), r " . (r , t). Two 1 1
t) are called related if they are fixed under
elliptic subgroups conjugate to either F ^ (r, t) or to T ^ (r t t). tient &a( T, t)/G(r, t),
t)
The quo
with images of related elliptic vertices identified,
is a Riemann surface with nodes
Sf
The genus of Sr t is
p,
and
48
LIPMAN BERS
Sr j. has as many nodes as there are zeros in (t1? . . . , t f). each
Sr ^ is equipped with a deformation
ff ^ : Sr ^
S,
Furthermore, determined up to
equivalence. II.
Xa (S )
is in a natural one-to-one correspondence with the set of
equivalence classes of deformations The fiber space ( M ) f Xa (S ), III. Y a (S )
Y a (S) over
S'
Xa (S )
S. is the set of points
(r ,t ,z )
with
z f QaV t ) .
is a domain in C 3P ~ 2.
L et A (r,t,z )| d z |
denote the Poincare metric in
t).
It projects
onto the Poincare" metric on Sf
Set d = d/dz,
IV. A ll functions dm(9n A,
n > 0, are continuous in Y a (S).
m > 0,
d = d/dz.
The proof depends on standard potential theoretic estimates. If S is non-singular, space
T (S ),
and
Xa (S )
may be identified with the Teichmiiller
Y a (S ) with the standard fiber space of Jordan domains
over T(S ). §4.
A U TO M O R PH IC FORMS One would like to attach to each point (r ,t )
of Xfl(S )
a b a sis of
regular q-forms on ST t, which depends holomorphically on (r, t). present we can do this only after removing from Xa (S) (except when S V.
For every
q,
At
a “ sm all” set
is non-singular or q = 1). 1 < q < v , and every
set o C XQ(S) — j(r °, t°)S
(r °,
t ° ) e XQ(S), there is a closed
which is either empty or of real codimension
2,
and d = (2q—l ) ( p —1) holomorphic functions j(r,t;z) defined for (r, t) e Xa (S ) — a, on Sf
(If t° =
z € &a( T, t), 0, o
which form a
basis of regular q-differentials
is an analytic subvariety. If S
is non-singular,
o may be chosen as empty.) We shall sketch the construction of these functions for k > 0. k = 0,
the result is known from Teichmiiller space theory.
If
49
SPACES OF DEGENERATING RIEMANN SURFACES
If t° = 0,
the first d—k functions j are Poincare" series
< £ j(M ;z ) = 2 $ j ( g ( z ) ) g ( z ) q , g e Gr t ,
where the O j tions 0 j
are appropriately chosen polynomials.
are defined as follow s.
of the loxodromic transformation
Let
a-(r, t),
The next k func
b^(r, t) be the fixed points
gj r t in the group Gr ^ which conju
gates one of the two groups r ^ (r , t),
T 'f e , t) onto the other.
These are
holomorphic functions which, for t- -> 0, become the two fixed points of r j(r ,t ),
lying in fia (r, t).
Set
I'jC’’, t; z ) = [z - a j( t , t )]—q [z - bjfr, t )]- q and oo
^ i+ d -k =
2
v i
-
£=o where y 1, y 2 , - - -
runs through all
Gr t if
t^ = 0,
and through a complete
list of right coset representatives of Gr ^ modulo the subgroup generated bv
g; r f if t* ^ 0. 1 ,/,L 1
In the case just considered, the functions 4>i are de1
fined in the whole domain
Y a (S),
and a is the divisor of the Wronskian
of the functions cf>l f ..., 0^. We say that a point (r, t) e Xa (S ) t- = 0 implies that t? = 0, If t° ^ 0,
lies not below
(r °, t ° ) e Xa (S)
if
i = l,...,r .
let kQ be the number of zeros among t^\ ...,t£ .
The first
d — kQ functions are Poincare series formed with d — kQ functions N
^jO", t; z ) = ^
a| [z — A (r , t )]—1 [ z - B ( r , t ) ] _1 [z - C q (j, t )]_1
£=i where a| are appropriately chosen constants and A(r, t),
B(r, t),
CjCr, t), ..., C N (r, t) appropriately chosen holomorphic functions defined for (r ,t )
not below
fixed points of Gr defined above, with
(r °,t °),
and representing N 4 - 2
The remaining kQ functions cj>j t? = 0.
distinct loxodromic are the
k
LIPMAN BERS
50
We need now a modification of the Petersson scalar product. Let 8 be a geodesic Jordan curve or a node of S. of area
2a,
A collar about 8,
in the union of two doubly connected regions on S,
Poincare"area
a,
each of
each bounded by 8 and by a Jordan curve 8 ' freely
homotopic to 8 and orthogonal to the pencil of geodesic arcs entering 8 if 8 is a point, orthogonal to 8 if 8 is a curve. We choose, once and for all, sufficiently small positive numbers and £ q , and a non-increasing function a(t), and
a(£ Q) = 0.
Let
denote the Riemann surface
removed every collar of area 2a(£)
0< t< +
with
aQ
a (0 ) = aQ
S from which we
2aQ about a node and every collar of area
about a geodesic Jordan curve of length
£ < £Q. (Cf. the paper by
L. Keen in this volume.) Let 0 (t)d t^ A(t)|dt|
and i/r(t)dt^ be two regular q-forms on S,
be the Poincare"metric on S;
set
here
and let
t is a local parameter.
We
n /> = i
I
I
0 (t ) 0Xt) A(t)2 -2 q d t A d f .
A basis of regular q-forms on S is called orthonormal if it is so with respect to this scalar product. formal structure of U sing
Such a b a sis is determined by the con
S, except for a unitary transformation.
IV and V and the compactness of the unitary group one estab
lishes VI.
If $T' i s
not isomorphic to Sf " ^ ,
then the points
(r', t ') and
N ' and N " such that no S f with (r,t) € N ' • >*■ is isomorphic to a SG g with (cr, s ) e N".
( t", t " )
have neighborhoods
U sin g VII.
V
one can also prove
There are p holomorphic functions 0 ( r , t ; z )
defined in Y (S)
J
which form a basis of regular
1-differentials on Sr
The proof involves normalizing regular 1-differentials on Sr t by the condition:
51
SPACES OF DEGENERATING RIEMANN SURFACES
f
0
k(t)d t =
sjk
where )S1,. . . , /3p are simple closed curves which either define non vanishing homology c la s s e s or are homotopic to nodes. One may use this result to study the behavior of a period matrix under degenerations. §5.
F E N C H E L -N IE L S E N C O O R D IN A T E S A partition of S is a set of 3p — 3 — k disjoint geodesic Jordan
curves on S,
where
k is the number of nodes.
The Jordan curves and
the nodes are called the boundary elements of the partition. ary element has two banks.
Every bound
A partition is ordered by ordering the 6p — 6
banks, with the provision that every bank of a boundary element which does not separate which does.
S has a lower number than any bank of an element
An ordering of the partition induces an ordering of the bound
ary elements, and induces a direction on every boundary element which is not a node.
F ollow in g the celebrated manuscript by Fenchel and N ielsen,
we can describe the conformal structure of a Riemann surface, endowed with an ordered partition, by such that we have
3p — 3 complex numbers
|£*|
is the length of the j-th boundary element, and for ^ 0 i O' = l£jl e J where the twist parameter 6j is determined by the
position of endpoints of certain geodesic arcs joining and orthogonal to distinct boundary elements. L et
S q be a terminal Riemann surface; it is partitioned by its nodes.
If we order this partition, then a deformation partition on S,
obtained by deforming every Jordan curve on S,
into a node of SQ, into a geodesic. mapping g : (r, t)
(£ x ,
N ielsen coordinates of by
g °fr f
g : S -> SQ induces an ordered
We call
£ 3p_ 3)
For where
(r ,t ) e Xa (S),
mapped
one obtains a
(£ j, . ..,£ 3p_ 3)
are the Fenchel-
t with respect to the ordered partition induced
g a Fen ch el-N ielsen mapping.
It is never holomorphic.
LIPMAN BERS
52
VIII.
Let
g : Xq (S ) -> C 3P
k < 3 p — 3 nodes,
3
g(Xa (S ))
be a F en ch el-N ielsen mapping.
If S has
is the complement of 3p — 3 — k coordinate
hyperplanes, and g is a covering ramified over k coordinate hyper planes, a universal covering, if k = 0,
a i/3 P" ~ 3 -sh eeted one if k = 3p—3.
§6. R E L A T IO N S B E T W E E N T H E SP A C E S
Xfl(S)
Statement VIII has several important consequences. IX. A homeomorphic deformation f .S^ -» S2 induces an isomorphism (o f complex manifolds) f^ : XQ(S 1) -> X^g(S2). Thus we may write
X (S)
instead of
Xa (S).
distinguished analytic hyper surfaces, the sets X.
Note that X(S) has t^ = 0 in XQ(S).
A deformation f : Sj -> S2, where S2 has I
more nodes than S j,
induces a holomorphic mapping f^ : X (S1) -> X(S2) the complement of I
k
such that f 5f;(X (S 1))
distinguished hypersurfaces and
is
is a universal
covering. Another consequence of VIII is XI. X (S)
is a cell.
Question:
is
X(S)
a domain of holomorphy?
If Sx has no nodes, so that
X (Sx)
there alw ays is a deformation S^ -> S, X (S1) -> X °(S ),
where
hypersurfaces of X(S). Mod (S 1),
X °(S )
can be identified with
T ^ ),
and therefore a universal covering
is the complement of a ll distinguished
The subgroup of the Teichmiiller modular group
which normalizes the covering group of this covering, induces
a group of holomorphic self-m appings of
X °(S );
this extends to a group
r(S)
of holomorphic self-m appings of
XII.
F (S )
X(S)
induced by topological automorphisms of S.
X(S).
is discrete, and is the group of holomorphic automorphisms of
53
SPACES OF DEGENERATING RIEMANN SURFACES
§7. M O D ULI S P A C E S Let II = n s (r ,t ) e Xa (S)
into the isomorphism c la ss of Sf ^. It turns out that R o y = 11
for y e T (S ), by T (S )
denote the canonical mapping X (S) -> Mp which takes
but that there are points in X (S ) which are not equivalent
and have the same image under Ilg.
(finite) isotropy group, in T (S ), point represented by XIII.
L et
r Q(S ) denote the
of the origin in X (S),
that is, of the
id : S -> S.
The origin in X (S)
such that if X j, X2 e N,
has a neighborhood N, then I K x j) = II(x 2)
stable under r Q(S),
if and only if y (x x) = x2
for some y e r Q(S). U sing statements IX - XIII one obtains XIV.
Mp has a Hausdorff topology and a structure of a normal complex
space (and a V -manifold) which makes all mappings II
holomorphic.
Note that isomorphism c la s s e s of Riemann surfaces with k > 0 nodes form an analytic subvariety of Mp, XV.
There is a number L ,
of codimension
depending only on p,
k. such that every S has
a partition in which no boundary element has length exceeding
L.
This is a geometric lemma which generalizes results by Mumford and by Keen. There are finitely many non-isomorphic terminal Riemann surfaces, S i,
of genus
p,
Ilg (X (S p ),
i = 1, ...,m .
and Mp is contained in the union of all By XV, each
X (S p
has a compact subset
such that M^ is contained in the union of a ll P
EL (X ;), o• i
X^
i = 1, ...,m . Thus
we obtain XVI.
Mp
is compact.
That the space of moduli of non-singular algebraic curves of genus can be compactified by adding moduli of stable curves with nodes was announced by Mayer and Mumford 10 years ago.
The desire to establish
p
54
LIPMAN BERS
this result without using higher dimensional algebraic geometry was the original stimulus for this investigation.
A P P E N D IX .
SC H O T T K Y G R O U PS
B esid es the spaces constructed in Section 2, there are many other spaces of Kleinian groups representing Riemann surfaces with nodes.
A
particularly simple example is that of Schottky groups. Let
0,1, oo, £'2, £3 , £'3, ..., £p,
tended complex plane, and let
be
2p distinct points in the ex
t1? ...,tp
be complex numbers,
such that the loxodromic Mobius transformations anc* multipliers course,
tj
with fixed points
are free generators of a Schottky group (of
£ 1 = 0, £\ = 00 anc* C2 =
(* )
gj
0 < |tj| < 1,
Such (3p—3)-tuples
( C 2X 3, - , C p, t 1, . . . , t p) e C 3P - 3
form the Schottky space.
We form the extended Schottky space Sp by
adding points with some or all of the tj with tj ^ 0 generate a Schottky group.
being
0,
provided that the
g^
A point in Sp represents, in an
obvious way, a Riemann surface of genus
p,
with one part, and with as
many nodes as there are zeros among t^, ...,tp . Many of the results stated above have valid analogues for the spaces Sp.
We shall describe only the construction of regular q-differentials,
for q > 1. Let
G be the group determined by the point (* ); it is understood that
if t- = 0,
there is no i-th generator.
Now set
$ 1(z ) = z ~ q , O j(z ) = ( z - £ ir q( z - C ir q ,
if t = (t 1, . ..,t p) = 0,
and OO
^ (z ) =
^ e=i
< W z ))/ e (z )q
i = 2 ,..., p ;
SPACES OF DEGENERATING RIEMANN SURFACES
if t ^ 0,
where y 1, y 2, ...
a lis t ° f right coset representatives of G
modulo the subgroup generated by G,
55
g-,
if
t- ^ 0,
a list of a ll elements of
if t{ = 0.
Also set F j(z) = zj+ 1 -q [ ( z - l ) ( z - £ '2) ( z - £ 3)... (z -£ p )]1-cl, and V j (2 )= 2
F j(g (z ))gm
j
= l,...,(2 q -l)(p -l)-p .
gf G Then the functions
0 1(z ), .
tions of all 3p—2 variables
0 (2 q _ i)(p _ i)(z)
are holomorphic func
£'9, ..., £ p , £ 'p , tii , ..., tp , z, z
q-differentials on the Riemann surface represented by (lC'2 » •••»tp) independent.
avoiding an analytic subvariety The subvariety
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
o
,
is presented by < a 1,
then M
i= l
a , b j , ...,b g i
is the group of c la s s e s
(mod Inn ^ S
S
automorphisms of
r1S , that is, automorphisms induced by free substitug which map
JJ
itse lf (but not a conjugate of its inverse).
1 -1
a -jb j
The group MQ is, of course, trivial. Since
77
^
) of proper S
7
tions on the generators
easy.
The homeo-
of Sg is the group of all isotopy c la s s e s of s e lf-
homeomorphisms of Sg.
in Hg,
g.
If
[a ^ b ^ ]
onto a conjugate of
g = 1 the situation is still
is free abelian of rank 2, the group Mj
57
is simply
JOAN S. BIRMAN
58
Aut7r1S1. If a ,b
are a canonical ba sis for
of 7r1S1 is specified by the images respectively. the 2 x 2
then an endomorphism
a
This mapping determines an element of
matrix
group of 2 x 2
||n-||
has determinant +1,
hence
is precisely the
integral matrices with determinant -fl.
been studied extensively in the c la ssic a l literature. esting case is
if and only if
This group has Thus the first inter
g = 2.
Generators and defining relations for the group M2 were determined by the author and H. Hilden in [6].
Their proof w as based upon a demon
stration that the group M2 is closely related to the mapping c la ss group of S2 with 6 punctures, and also to the mapping c la ss group of the 6-punctured sphere.
We w ill d iscuss that result in Section 4 below, but
first we review the related questions of (i) the determination of generators for Mg and (ii) the relationship between the mapping c la ss groups of closed and punctured surfaces. §2.
Generators for Mg Let
c
be a simple closed curve on a surface
Sg.
L et
neighborhood of c which is homeomorphic to a cylinder. N c has cylindrical coordinates tc
about c
(y ,0 ),
—1 < y < + 1,
is defined by the identity map outside
(y ,0 + 7r(y + l)).
N c be a
Assum e that
0 < 0 < 2n. A twist
N c , with
tc(y, 0 ) =
(See Figure 1.) Observe that isotopic deformations of the
F ig . l C y lin d rica l neighborhood of the curve c.
N( c
Image of N c
under the tw ist
MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OF SURFACES
C2g+2
F ig . 2.
C3g—1
Generators for
curve c w ill not alter the isotopy c la s s sense of
59
M^.
rQ of a twist
tc
about c.
The
depends on the choice of a positive direction for 0 (but not
for y )
in the parametrization of N , and may be fixed for every c f S u & by assigning an orientation to and using a rule such as “ positive twists move points on a directed line segment which is approaching c to the right.’ ’ Such a rule w ill be valid for points on either side of c. Note that the sense of rQ does not depend on the orientation of c. It was proved by Dehn [12] that
is generated by twists.
Dehn’s
result was later reproved and sim plified by Lickorish [18,19], who showed that the particular set r
, ...,r
illustrated in Figure 2 w ill do. It 3g — 1 may be shown that the mapping c la s s groups of punctured surface (where C 1
the punctures are either kept fixed as a set, or kept fixed individually) are also generated by twists [3].
This is still true if we remove discs
instead of points, requiring either that the boundaries of the discs be kept fixed pointwise or that they be kept fixed setw ise [30], and again it is true (with a single exception) for non-orientable surfaces [9].
It is not
known whether any sim ilar result holds for higher dimensional manifolds; one suspects not.
A lgebraically, there is a c lo se relationship between
the automorphisms induced by twist maps and elementary N ielsen trans
60
JOAN S. BIRMAN
formations [24].
Intuitively, one may explain the universality of these
particular generators for mapping c la ss groups of surfaces by observing that non-abelian surface groups are either free or are one relator groups, and that in the latter case every automorphism is induced by a free substi tution; in the abelian case, the only surface group which is not free is free abelian of rank 2,
and every automorphism of a free abelian group of rank
2 is induced by a free substitution [24]. We illustrate with an example why twist maps are so pleasant to work with.
A s noted above,
M0 is generated by r
be p o ssib le to express the isotopy c la ss curve
,...,r
. Hence it must
C1
z
5
r£ of the twist tf about the
f in Figure 3 as a product of powers of these generators.
now show how to find this power product explicitly. c and d are simple closed curves on Sg, of Sg which maps
c onto d,
We w ill
F irst observe that if
and if h is a homeomorphism
then
a)
td = h t c h - 1 .
Second, we observe that if c
and d are simple closed curves on Sg
which meet in precisely one point, with algebraic intersection 1, effect of the twist tc where it meets
c,
on the curve
d is obtained by cutting the curve
and inserting a copy of c.
examine the effect of the twist product t_
t_ 5
(se e Figures 3 (ii), 3 (iii) and 3 (iv )). S0 the curve 1
t_
t_ 5
t_ 4
t_ 3
(c * ) 2
then the
With this rule in mind, we t_
4
d
t_ 3
on the curve
c.,,
2
From Figure 3 (iv) one sees that on is isotopic to f.
This fact, together
1
with equation (1), implies the ‘ ‘relation’ ’
rc Tc Tc rc 1 rc 1 Tc 1 rc 1 rf1 = Tc 5 Tc c 4 u 3 c 2 C1 2 u3 4 c5 in M2 . With a little practice it is p ossible to discover very complex rela tions in Mg by an escalation of this simple technique.
In particular, we
note two general types of “ lo c a l” relations which occur in a ll of the groups Mg,
which are easily verified by the method just described.
They are:
MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OF SURFACES
F ig . 3.
E x p re s sin g
T^ as a power product of T\>T2 , T 3>T4>TS'
61
62
JOAN S. BIRMAN
(3)
^
if
rc rd = rd rc
c
n
d = 0
if c an(i ^ ^ave algebraic intersection
Tc Td rc = Td Tc Td
1 .
We observe that Artin’s braid group [5,24] may be defined by a system of relations which are all of type (3) or (4).
This is the first hint one has
of a connection between braids and twist maps, and indeed this connection has proved to be a very important one. A non-trivial twist map is, of course, alw ays of infinite order.
It is of
interest to note that Maclachlin has found a set of elements, each of which has finite order, which also generate
[20], and this result has been
extended by Patterson [28] to surfaces with punctures, for a ll except cer tain exceptional cases.
This fact was used by Maclachlin [20] and again
by Patterson [28] to prove that the space of moduli is in most cases simplyconnected.
These two papers are interesting examples of how knowledge
about the mapping c la ss group has been applied to Riemann surface theory. §3. The relationship between mapping class groups of closed surfaces and of surfaces with punctures Let
Q = Sq1? . . . , q n S denote an arbitrary but henceforth fixed set of
points on the surface cla ss group of S^,
S . The group M is defined to be the mapping & &>n with adm issible maps and isotopies restricted to those
which keep the set
Q
fixed.
Pa the “ pure” mapping &>n class group, is defined by the condition that adm issible maps and iso topies keep each point
q-
A second group,
fixed.
It is immediate that M
from P
by extending by the full symmetric group &>n tion first on P _ The relationship between the groups
P
and P
is obtained
2 . We fix our attenn
__,
m ^ n,
was
studied by the author in [3]:
THEOREM (Birman).
Let
be the natural homomorphism from P
to Per n 1 ( defined by “ filling in ” the n puncture). Then &>n—1 is canonically isomorphic to 771(S^—q 1, ••.,q n_ 1) / center.
ker O
&>n
&>n
63
MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OF SURFACES
T h is result has an easy intuitive explanation.
Suppose that a
is a
non-trivial element of ker O g n> Then a may be represented by a s e lfhomeomorphism of (S^—q1, . . . , q n) (S g—q ^ . - . , q n),
which is not isotopic to the identity on
but is isotopic to the identity on (Sg—q ^ .• .,q n__1).
is the isotopy, then the orbit « t(q n) ^iCSg—q i ,
qn_ i )
If
of qn defines an element of
which we may associate with a.
Looking at this from another point of view, we w ill locate in Mg n a set of maps which generate a subgroup isomorphic to ^ ( S For sim plicity, first take
n = 1,
simple closed curves on S
q = 1.
L et
a 1, . . . , a g ,
—q 1? . . . , q n_ 1).
b^-.^bg
which form a canonical basis for n.S . Let b
o
a-j^ j , ..., ag j , h1 1, ..., bg ^ be a second such system, with each chosen to be homotopic to a j ?b^ on Sg, the puncture q j
be
on Sg—
. Then
a ^ ,b^
but separated from a^, b^ by
ker O g j
is generated by the
2g
twist products V o r 7 1 , ru 1 J I a i a i,i b i b i,i
1 < i < g r • -
It is not difficult to convince oneself that these
2g surface mappings
satisfy the same relations in P g 1 as do { a ^ - ; 1 < i < g! similar construction holds for arbitrary
n;
one chooses
{ a i l , b ii, a ij ; i = 1, ..., g, j = 2, ..., ni with
a^
ai> bj
but homotopic to a-
by the punctures
closed surface.
\q1 U q2 U ... U q^i,
Then, if
n > 1, g > 1,
ker $
and b ^
in z^Sg.
A
2g+n—1 curves separated from on the
is generated freely by
the 2g+n—1 pairs
V a ra 1 ’ Tb rb 1 >ra 'a ’* ’ I i i,l i i,l a l , j - l a l , j Knowledge of the group
ker O
1 < i < g, 2 < j < n > . )
may be used to find a system of deb> n
fining relations for P
b>n
, and hence for M
b>n
, by an iterative procedure,
if one knows defining relations for P g Q = Mg Q. (The action of P g n ^ on ker O
b>“
may be determined by the method described in Section 2 of
this paper.) T h is procedure easily goes over to a procedure for finding defining relations for the groups
M
since the latter may be obtained & >n
64
JOAN S. BIRMAN
from P g n by extension by
£ n. For explicit results for
trary
n,
see [3]; for g = 0 and arbitrary
(using a different method) [21].
g = 1 and arbi
n see [29], or [30], and also
These results are not available for
because the group P g 0 = Mg Q is not well-understood.
g > 2
U sin g recent re
sults in [6] it should, however, be possible to determine presentations for M2
for arbitrary
n.
In addition to indicating a technique for finding defining relations for the groups
P
or M our theorem also yields insight into the struc&>n & * 11 ture of the group P a n, for it tells us that P may be built up from &>n &>n P 0 by repeatedly extending ^ ( S g - q j , q j { _ 1) by P g k _ i for each k = 1 ,2 ,..., n—1.
This yields, for example, a unique normal form in P „ &>n (modulo a normal form in P g 0). The n-string braid group of a surface is defined to be the fundamental group of the space of unordered n-tuples of distinct points of S.
(If S
is taken to be the Euclidean plane, this yields the c la s s ic a l braid group of Artin [24]; in the more general case, it yields a related group.) Let 'Pg n denote the natural homomorphism from Mg n to Mg Q defined by fillin g in the punctures.
Then our theorem may be restated “ the kernel of
'Pg n is isomorphic to the n-string braid group of Sg modulo its center.” The significance of this connection between braid groups of surfaces and mapping c la ss groups lies mainly in the fact that braid groups have been studied extensively, both from a topological and from an algebraic point of view, and the possibility exists for applying some of this knowledge to Riemann surface theory.
For a general introduction to the theory of braid
groups, see [5] and [32].
For an explicit development o f the connections
between
ker 'Pcy
and M
, see [2, 3, 29].
For a discussion of the re-
lationship between braid groups of surfaces and the n-fold product group ^ jS g X ... x
Sg see [13].
For generalizations to higher dimensions, see
[11].
§4. Lifting and projecting homeomorphisms In this section we discu ss a method for attacking the problem of find ing defining relations for the groups
Mg Q. The method w as used by the
65
MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OF SURFACES
author and Hilden in [ 6 ] to determine a presentation for the group but if
M2 0,
g > 3 the method yields, at best, a presentation for a “ la rg e ” sub
group of Mg 0 (probably alw ays of infinite index).
The problem of find
ing defining relations for the full group Mg Q is open if g > 3.
The
methods described in this section do, however, indicate relationships which exist between subgroups of Mg Q and subgroups of Mg/ suitable triplets L et £
(g, g', n')«
be a hyperelliptic involution on the surface
space of Sg under the action of £ 7T exhibits the image (S q — B )
Sg B =
for
Sg.
The orbit
is a sphere, and the collapsin g map
as a 2-fold ramified covering of SQ, with branching over 77
(B )
of the
2g+2
fixed points
B
of £ .
If h : ( S Q — B )
is a homeomorphism, then h alw ays lifts to Sg,
and its lift h
w ill be “ £-sym m etric,” that is: (5)
h £ h = £
.
If h represents the c la ss of the identity in MQ 2g+2 , then between
h and the identity map on SQ — B
is °t°P y
also lifts, and its lift
w ill have the property that h^ is also £-symmetric for each
h^
0 < t < 1.
Let M ( £ ) denote the group of £-symmetric mapping c la s s e s of S , that o o is adm issible maps and adm issible isotopies are required to commute with £.
One would not expect M g (£ )
to embed as a subgroup of Mg Q, because
the requirement that two homeomorphisms
h, k be £-sym m etrically iso
topic is a stronger requirement than isotopy.
Nevertheless, it w as d is
covered in [ 6 ] that: (i)
If h : Sg -> Sg is an £-symmetric homeomorphism which is isotopic to the identity map of Sg, between
(ii)
If
g = 2,
h and
then there is an £-symmetric isotopy
id.
every element of Mg Q has an £-symmetric representa
tive. A s a consequence of (i) and (ii) one obtains almost immediately: (i ) *
Mg(£)
maps homomorphically onto MQ 2g+ 2 ,
subgroup of order (i i )* M 2( £ )
2 generated by the c la ss of £ .
coincides with
M2 Q.
kernel the
JOAN S. BIRMAN
66
This allow s us to lift the known presentation for MQ 6
to M2 Q and so
obtain defining relations in M2 Q. Even more, it shows the clo se rela tionship between the group M2 Q (and its appropriate generalizations to ^-symmetric subgroups of Mg) and the mapping class group MQ 2 g+ 2 the punctured sphere, which is in turn a close relative of Artin’s braid group (cf. Section 3 above).
Thus, for example, knowledge of the exist
ence of elements of finite order in MQ 6
may be applied to describe the
elements of finite order in M2 Q [s e e 16]. These ideas were extended to the case where £
is replaced by any
element of finite order in Mg Q by the author and Hilden in [7, finite subgroups of and Maclachlan, in [16].
8
], and to
Q (with a somewhat different emphasis) by Harvey If G
is a finite group of homeomorphisms of Sg,
then one may define a symmetric mapping c la ss group M g(G) the requirement that adm issible maps
(6 )
h G h_ 1
of
by
h satisfy
= G .
Note that if h, k are two representatives of an element of Mg(G), the isotopy
hj. joining
h to k must satisfy ( 6 ) for each
0
< t
3,
then for every finite set of points
sphere, and for every element a there is a Riemann surface
B
in the automorphism group of
S which covers
He e s
on the 771
(Sq —B),
SQ and is ramified over B,
MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OF SURFACES
such that a does not lift to an automorphism of
^ S.
67
The connections
77
between these ideas and c la s s ic a l work of Hurwitz [17], and also recent work of V. I. Arnold [1] has also been explored by Magnus in [ 2 2 ], and by Magnus and P elu so in [23]. §5. D oes Since
Mg/[Mg, Mg]
have order
1 or 2,
if g < 3?
Mg is generated by tw ists, and since these twist generators
are all in a single conjugacy c la s s , it follow s immediately that Mg/[Mg,Mg] is a cyclic group. Mg/[Mg,Mg]
Known relations between these twist maps imply that
has order 2 or
1 if
g > 3 [se e Section 4], however it re
mains an unsolved problem whether Mg/[Mg,Mg]
does, in fact, have order
To prove this it would be adequate to find any relator in Mg which is a product of an odd number of twists; alternatively, to show that Mg/[Mg,Mg] has order M
0
2
, it would be adequate to exhibit a single homomorphism from
onto a group of order 2.
The problem of finding such homomorphisms
w ill be discussed in the next section. §6 . Finite representations of Mg A group
G
is said to be residually finite if for every
a homomorphism
rj: G -> Q,
with
Q finite, such that
g f G
(g ) ^ 1.
77
there is R esidual
finiteness is a pleasant property for an infinite group to have, because it offers the possibility that many aspects of the group
G
may be investi
gated in finite quotients of G. One collection of finite quotients of our group Mg which has been known for a long time is the c la ss of groups
\S (2g, Z
P
p
); p prime, n > 1|.
In 1965 it w as established by Mennicke [26] that this c la ss exhausted the finite quotients of Mg which factor through
Sp(2g, Z ),
however until very
recently it was not known whether Mg had any finite quotients which do not factor through
Sp(2g, Z ).
For this reason, it is particularly interesting
that E. Grossman has established that Mg is residually finite [14]. R. Gilman has suggested a concrete method for constructing finite representations of Mg,
and it is not difficult to arrange this construction
so that the representation does not factor through Sp(2g, Z ).
We w ill give
1
.
JOAN S. BIRMAN
68
a brief description of Gilm an’s construction, and of its geometric meaning. Let
Q be an arbitrary but henceforth fixed finite group, and let \r}^;\eA\
be the collection of a ll homomorphisms from
onto Q.
T hese homo-
morphisms may be listed explicitly by a straightforward procedure in which one tests every p o ssible mapping from the generators of ni^ g to see whether the single defining relation in homomorphism rj^
ni^ g
°nto
is satisfied.
Q
A
may be defined explicitly by an ordered array of
2
g
elements of which are the images of a standard set of generators of ^ S g under
^.
If
77
then 177^
: ni ^ g ^ Q
is one such representation, and if t e Aut Q,
w ill be another such representation, hence we may divide our
representations into equivalence c la s s e s
(mod Aut Q).
collection of all such equivalence c la s s e s .
L et
N
Each element of N
be the may be
described geometrically as the covering space of Sg which belongs to the subgroup
ker
^
77
of ^i^g*
Thus
N
may be regarded as the c o lle c
tion of all Riemann surfaces which are regular coverings of a fixed surface Sg,
with group of covering transformations isomorphic to Q. The mapping c la ss group Mg
may now be allowed to act on the set
N
as a group of permutations, by the rule that if a e Mg is represented by a * e Aut to
ttj
^ a^.
77
Sg,
then the permutation na
induced by a maps each
^
77
It is not difficult to check that na is independent of the choice
of representative a
that na preserves equivalence c la s s e s (mod Aut Q);
and finally that na^ = TTa nf i ’ a finite representation of Mg tions of the finite set
6
^g*
Therefore one obtains in this way
as a subgroup of the group of a ll permuta
N.
While these representations were introduced because it was hoped that they would provide answers to certain explicit questions about Mg (such as the question which was posed in Section 5 above), they are also of con siderable interest from a purely group-theoretical point of view. group Mg is a perfect group (i.e .,
Mg/[Mg,Mg] =
If the
then all of its finite
quotients w ill also be perfect groups, hence Gilman’s construction would give an explicit method for finding infinite sequences of finite perfect groups.
Tw o such finite representations have been studied by the author
69
MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OF SURFACES
(unpublished).
The first uses the group
£ 3
of permutations on 3 letters
as the defining subgroup, to obtain a transitive representation of M3
as
a group of permutations of 2,530 letters. The second uses the the quaternion group of order
8
as a group
, to obtain a transitive representation of M3
of permutations of 5,040 letters.
REFERENCES
[1].
Arnold, V. I., “ Remarks on the branching of hyperelliptic in tegrals,” Functional A n alysis and its Applications (E n glish translation), V ol. 2 (1968).
[2 ].
Birman, Joan S., “ On Braid G roups,” Com. Pure and App. Math., 22 (1969), pp. 41-72.
[3].
Birman, Joan S., “ Mapping c la ss groups and their relationship to braid groups,” Com. Pure and Applied Math., 22 (1969), pp. 213-238.
[4].
Birman, Joan S., “ A belian quotients of the mapping c la ss group of a 2-m anifold,” Bull. AMS, 76 (1970), pp. 147-150; Errata: ibid., 77 (1971), pp. 479.
[5].
Birman, Joan S., “ Braids, links and mapping c la ss groups,” a re search monograph, to appear in Annals of Mathematics Studies Series, early 1974.
[ 6 ].
Birman, J., and Hilden, H., “ Mapping c la ss groups of closed sur faces as covering s p a c e s ,” Annals of Math. Studies # 6
6
, “ Advances
on the theory of Riemann S u rfaces,” ed. Ahlfors et a l., Princeton University P re ss, 1972. [7].
Birman, J., and Hilden, H., “ Isotopies of homeomorphisms of Riemann surfaces and a theorem about A rtin's braid group,” Bull. AMS, 78, No.
[ 8 ].
6
, Nov. 1972, pp. 1002-1004.
Birman, J., and Hilden, H., “ Isotopies of homeomorphisms of Riemann su rfa c e s,” Annals of Math., to appear.
[9].
Birman, Joan S., and Chillingworth, D. R. J., “ On the homeotopy group of a non-orientable su rfa c e ,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 71 (1972), pp. 437-448.
JOAN S. BIRMAN
70
[10]. [11].
Cohen, David, “ The Hurwitz Monodromy G roup/’ Ph.D. thesis, 1962. Dahm, David, “ A generalization of braid theory,” Princeton Univ. Ph.D. thesis, 1962.
[12].
Dehn, M., “ Die Gruppe der A bbild u n gsk lassen ,” Acta Math., 69 (1938), pp. 135-206.
[13].
Goldberg, C ., “ An exact sequence of braid groups,” to appear in Math. Scand.
[14].
Grossman, Edna K., “ On the residual finiteness of certain mapping cla ss groups,” to appear.
[15].
Harvey, W., “ C yclic groups of automorphisms of a compact Riemann su rface,” Quart. Jnl. of Math., 17, No.
[16].
6 6
(1969), pp. 86-97.
Harvey, W., and Maclachlan, C ., “ On mapping-class groups and Teichmiiller s p a c e s ,” to appear.
[17].
Hurwitz, A ., “ Uber Riemannsche Flachen mit gege benen V erzw eigungs punkten,” Math Annalen 39 (1891), pp. 1-61.
[18].
Lickorish, W. B. R ., “ A representation of orientable, combinatorial 3-m anifolds,” Annals of Math. 76 (1962), pp. 531-540.
[19].
Lickorish, W. B. R ., “ A finite set of generators for the homeotopy group of a 2-manifold,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 60 (1964), pp. 769778.
[20].
A lso , Corrigendum, 62 (1966), pp. 679-681.
Maclachlan, C ., “ Modulus space is sim ply-connected,” Proc. AMS, 29 (1971), pp. 85-86.
[21].
Magnus, W., “ Uber Automorphismen von Fundamental gruppen Berandeter F lach en ,” Math Annalen 109 (1934), pp. 617-646.
[22].
Magnus,
W., “ Braids and Riemann su rfa c e s,” Comm,
on Pure and
Applied Math., 25 (1972), pp. 151-161. [23].
Magnus,
W., and P ellu so, A ., “ On a theorem of V. I.
Arn old,” Comm.
Pure and Applied Math., 22 (1969), pp. 683-692. [24].
Magnus, K arass and Solitar, “ Combinatorial Group T heory,” Inter science, John Wiley and Sons, 1966.
[25].
Mangier,
“ Die klassen von topologischen Abbildungen einer
geschlossenen Flache auf s ic h ,” Math Zeitsch, 44 (1939), pp. 541554.
MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OF SURFACES
[26].
71
Mennicke, “ Zur Theorie der Siegelschen Modulgruppe,” Math Annalen 159 (1965), pp. 115-129.
[27].
N ielsen , J., “ Untersuchen zur Topologie der geschlossenen Z w eiseitigen Flachen I , ” Acta Math. 50 (1927), pp. 184-358, also III, Acta Math 58 (1932), pp. 87-167.
[28].
Patterson, D ., “ The fundamental group of the moduli s p a c e / ’ Mich. Jnl. of Math., to appear.
[29].
Scott, G. P ., “ Braid groups and the group of homeomorphisms of a su rface,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.
[30].
6 8
(1970), pp. 605-617.
Sprows, David, “ Isotopy classification of homeomorphism of multiplypunctured compact 2-m anifolds,” thesis, Univ. of Penna., 1972.
[31].
Zieschang, H., “ On the homeotopy groups of su rfa c e s,” Math Annalen, to appear.
[32].
Magnus, W., “ Braid groups; a su rvey ,” to appear.
A N O T E ON
L 2 (r \ G )
Su-shing Chen
Let
G be a locally compact topological group and T
subgroup of G T
of G
such that T \ G
on L 2 ( r \ G )
is compact.
is unitary and
be a discrete
The regular representation
L 2(T \ G )
splits into the direct
sum of a countable number of invariant irreducible subspaces with finite multiplicities. Consider the collection of all subgroups r.
Then each T a \ G
If T o C
is compact.
embedding L 2 (Tp \ G ) C L 2 (F a \ G ) . L 2 (T a \ G ) ( a * A ) lows.
We set r
is denoted by q
= r,
r ; = r
L 2( r / a _ 1 \ G ) C L 2( r /a \ G ) . of the subspace
F 2 ( r /a _
1
sum of the Hilbert spaces representation of
G
H. 1
, then we have a natural
This space can be described as fol
n . „ n r a . Then Ha
and
c r
/a _
1
and
the orthogonal complement
in L 2 (F 'a \ G ) .
L2 (r \ G )
on H.
of finite index in
The direct limit of the spaces
Denote by
\G)
F a (a e A )
Then
Ha (a e A ).
H
is the direct
There is a natural
Furthermore, the representation on H splits
into a countable direct sum of irreducible unitary representations. The above account is given on pp. 19-20 of [1 ], where the follow ing question for G = SL(2, R )
is raised:
Is the multiplicity with which an
irreducible unitary representation occurs in this decomposition finite? In this note, we sh all explain why the answer is negative. It is shown on p. 78 of [1] that when T ments, the multiplicity
N “ (F )
discrete series occurs in T
does not contain elliptic e le
with which the representation
is given by the formula:
77 where pi(r \ G )
denotes the volume of T \ G .
73
T“
of the
SU-SHING CHEN
74
Consider a sequence r i+ 1 ^ r .
and
1
{ F - J of subgroups of T
< [r * : r . +1] = Aj < oo, for
such that Tq = T ,
i = 0 ,1 ,2 ,...
. The existence
of such a sequence follow s from the fact that the fundamental group of a surface of genus of any order. covering,
g >
1
can be mapped homomorphically onto a cylic group
Since the projection
/u(Fi+ 1 \ G ) = X j / r C T G )
N ^ (T j+1) = A qA j^
THEOREM.
Let
...A . n J cT ),
T j+1\ G -> T j \ G and
N n ( r i+1) =
Therefore
and consequently we have:
n be a positive odd integer.
with which the representations
is a A -sh e e te d
T^
Then the multiplicities
of the discrete series occur in the
decomposition of H are infinite.
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601
REFERENCES
[1].
G e l’fand, I. M., Graev, M. E ., and Pyatetskii-Shapiro, I. I., Repre sentation theory and automorphic functions, Saunders, Philadelphia, London, and Toronto, 1969.
ON T H E O U T R A D IU S OF F IN IT E -D IM E N S IO N A L T E IC H M U L L E R S P A C E S T. Chu
The universal Teichmiiller space, functions
T (l),
may be defined as the set of
l i
which are Schwarzian
derivatives of mapping functions admitting quasi-conformal extension to C. T (l)
has a natural embedding in the linear space
II0 1 1 =
for (f> € B 2 ( l ) .
s u j ^ (|z |2 — l
)2
B2 (l)
with
|0 (z)|
It follow s from well-known results of Nehari, H ille and
Ahlfors and W eill that
0
(1) =
id )
o (l)
=
Sup
0fT(l)
l|0 1| =
inf
0 f B2(D—T(l)
6
||0 || =
2
.
is the radius of the sm allest b a ll about O containing T ( l )
called the outradius of T ( l ) . O contained in T ( l ) .
i(l)
and is
is the radius of the largest ball about
It is also known that the function
k (z) = — - —-
-6
(Z_1)
i_ = [k] = ------------ with norm 6 . k (z) is the (z 2- l f usual Koebe function composed on the right with the Mobius transformation has a Schwarzian derivative
z -» z - 1 .
e d T (l)
since there are holomorphic
defined on A * , [k n(z )] e T ( l )
and
( l — pf)
||[kn] — [k] || -» 0.
75
’ **1
roots
kn(z )
T. CHU
76
If G
is a Fuchsian group leaving the unit circle invariant, we define B 2 (G ) = \ e B 2 (l)| (< £ ° y )(z )y '(z ) 2 = 0 ( Z) , for z £ A *
T (G ),
the Teichmiiller space of G,
and y t Gi . is the component containing 0
T ( l ) fl B 2 (G ).
T (G )
and only if
is finitely generated and of the first kind.
G
of
is a topological c e ll which is finite dimensional if
The major result presented here is a construction lemma leading to an asymptotic estimate for o(G ),
where
o (G ) =
sup \\\\ . 0 £ T (G )
The construction theorem is a generalization, suggested by Akaza, of a technique of Klein.
The application to estimates of o (G ) w as proposed
by Abikoff.
The precise statement is
Theorem .
For each 8 > 0,
Fuchsian group G
there is a finitely generated hyperbolic
of the first kind, for which o (G ) >
—e.
6
Before proceeding, we need the following definition. curves
and J 2
are said to have Frechet distance
8
Two Jordan (J 1 ,J 2) < £ ,
there are parametrizations a^(t) of J-, i = 1, 2, 0 < t < 1 so that a 2 (t)| < e
for each
t e [0,1].
if
la ^ t ) —
We w ill state the two basic lemmas, show
that the theorem follow s easily from them, and then give their proofs.
LEMMA 1. For each positive is a 1 +
0 so that, if Jj
is a Jordan curve with 5 (J 1 ,J2)
onto Ext J 2
||[f]|| >
satisfies
Given a rectifiable Jordan curve J and e 3 > 0,
—8 .
there exists
a finitely generated purely loxodromic quasi-Fuchsian group G first kind so that S(J, A (G )) < e 3>
6
of the
77
OUTRADIUS OF TEICHMULLER SPACES
Proof of Theorem. Each
^1 + —^ -le v e l curve
Jn of k is a rectifiable
Jordan curve hence we may find finitely generated purely loxodromic quasiFuchsian groups
G n k so that
conformal map of A * f'n k(°°) >
Lim ^ (J n> A (G n k)) -> 0.
onto Ext A (G n k)
normalized by
L et
fn k be the
fn j^C00) =
a ^d
00
It follow s from the Caratheodory convergence theorem [1]
that f n k converges normally to f R, the conformal map of A * Ext Jn with
fn( oo) = oo and
yields that [ f n
f'n(oo) > o.
onto
The Cauchy Integral theorem then
converges normally to [ f n] Lim ||[ffl k]|| < ||[fn]|| > k ->oo ’
hence 6
- £ .
It is w ell known that f ^ k ^ n k^n k is a Lnitely generated purely hyper bolic Fuchsian group
H n k of the first kind and
[f fl k] e T (H n k)
which
proves the theorem. Proof of Lemma
1
. We may assume
conditions are satisfied by rj of, [f].
f(°o) = oo and f '(° ° ) > 0 since these
r/ a Mobius transformation and
We now assume that the Lemma is false.
for each
£ and £^ and a ll s 2 > 0,
lar, if e n
[77
of] =
It would then follow that
the conclusion is false.
In particu
, J i n denotes the ( 1 + s n)-le v e l curve of k (z) and J 2 n ’ 1 * f is a Jordan curve with