126 94 26MB
English Pages 308 [309] Year 1989
Schriften zu Regional- und Verkehrsproblemen in Industrie- und Entwicklungsländern
Band 49
Adjustment Problems in Advanced Open Economies: Japan and Germany Edited by
Theodor Dams Takashi Matsugi
Duncker & Humblot · Berlin
Adjustment Problems in Advanced Open Economies: Japan and Germany
Schriften zu Regional- und Verkehrsproblemen in Industrie- und Entwicklungsländern Herausgegeben von J. Heinz Müller und Theodor Dams
Band 49
Adjustment Problems in Advanced Open Economies: Japan and Germany edited by Theodor Dams Takashi Matsugi
Duncker & Humblot * Berlin
CIP-Titelaufnahme der Deutschen Bibliothek Adjustment problems in advanced open economies: Japan and Germany / ed. by Theodor Dams ; Takashi Matsugi. — Berlin : Duncker u. Humblot, 1989 (Schriften zu Regional- und Verkehrsproblemen in Industrie- und Entwicklungsländern ; Bd. 49) ISBN 3-428-06623-5 NE: Dams, Theodor [Hrsg.]; GT
Alle Rechte vorbehalten © 1989 Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin 41 Druck: Werner Hildebrand, Berlin 65 Printed in Germany ISSN 0582-0170 ISBN 3-428-06623-5
Editors' Foreword This book of readings contains the results of the 10th Joint Seminar of the Faculties of Economics of Nagoya University, Nagoya/Japan, and of Albert-LudwigsUniversity, Freiburg/FR Germany, held in October 1986. The 10th anniversary of the joint meetings was marked with a jubilee symposium. The symposium was held in Freiburg and was co-sponsored by the regional Chamber of Industry and Commerce (IHK Südlicher Oberrhein). More than one hundred businessmen and businesswomen joined in the one-day event. Freiburg's Faculty of Economics and the Chamber sought to offer the local business world a comprehensive view of German-Japanese business cooperation. Keynote lectures included a report on how to manage a German subsidiary in Japan and how to manage a Japanese subsidiary in the FR Germany. Both of these lectures are included in this volume (papers by Schneidewind of Wella AG and by Kuraku of Panasonic). The afternoon session centered around a discussion of experienced businessmen, coordinated by A. Meckel , manager of the Deutsch-Japanisches Wirtschaftsförderungsbüro (German-Japanese Business Promotion Office), Düsseldorf. Among others, managers from regional small and medium enterprises and representatives of leading banks (Deutsche Bank, Sumitomo Bank) gave their views. The public jubilee symposium again emphasized the pragmatic approach to the Nagoya-Freiburg cooperation: It not only intended to promote basic research on the Japanese and German economy, as well as on their international economic relations, but it should also help companies to gain an understanding on how to internationalize their business and assist them in finding a "niche" in the promising German-Japanese market by producing specialized products of high quality. This is done with a particular emphasis on the problems of small and medium enterprises (SME). Both in the Tokai region of Japan, with its regional capital Nagoya, and in the southern part of Baden, with Freiburg as the "capital of the Black Forest", SMEs make up a large proportion of enterprises. SMEs are both important innovators and employers. However, they are rather fragile institutions, which need to be studied well, if one endeavours to help them. The Economics Faculties of both Freiburg and Nagoya have chosen SMEs as one of their major research subjects. The research-oriented 10th Joint Seminar, whose proceedings are documented in this volume, also gives evidence to this objective. Papers by management scientists Yamada and Fahrion give a very concrete idea of how new technologies enter the business world; SMEs in Japan are emphasized. Hilke and Blümle/Hauser discuss issues facing SMEs in the state of Baden-Württemberg. Matsugi and
VI
Foreword
Pascha analyze trends in the internationalization of the Japanese and German economy on a sectoral level. Mizuno and Oberhauser/Scherf examine how business issues are related to the macroeconomic level and its government policies. Insights into the methodology of how to analyze firms are offered by Schmidt , Kishida, and Saito. These papers reflect the situation in 1986. As is well known, economic conditions in Germany, and possibly even more so in Japan, are changing very fast. Both the yen and the D M have been revalued significantly since 1985, and the effects of this change are still felt. Thus, the papers can but give a condensed view of one stage in the process of continuous change. Still, they may serve readers as documents of how economic change is appreciated while it is taking place and how actors react to limited information at a certain point in time. In giving birth to this publication, many "midwives" have helped. We are particularly grateful to the continuous cooperation of the Nagoya working group under its new chairman, Professor Takashi Matsugi. Financial assistance from the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft in Freiburg im Breisgau made this publication possible. Secretarial work was done in Freiburg University's Institute of Development Policy. However, authors remain responsible for their individual contributions. Freiburg, November 1988 J. Heinz Müller
Theodor Dams
Table of Contents ,,Unternehmungsphilosophie'4 and Human Concept — Questions to the Research of Real Theory — Ralf-Bodo Schmidt
1
Entrepreneurship: Management Ideology and Corporate Strategy Tamiki Kishida Management of a German Subsidiary in Japan — Experiences and Challenges — Dieter Schneidewind
21 43
Management of a Japanese Establishment in the Federal Republic of Germany — A Report on Experiences with Problems and Solution Approaches Seinosuke Kuraku Process Innovation and Small Firms in Japan Motonari Yamada
65 77
Fifth Generation Technology — Basic Principles and Economic Implications — Roland Fahrion
91
The Influence of German Business Administration on Japanese Business Administration — Especially in Reference to Accounting Takao Saito
107
Development of External Accounting in the FRG According to the 4th and 7th EC Directives — The New German Accounting and Reporting Law — Wolfgang Hilke
119
The Foreign Trade Structure of Japan Takashi Matsugi
149
Patterns of the Balance of Payments in the Optimal Growth Model Ryuhei Okumura
173
Exports of Baden-Württemberg within the Frame of the Federal Republic of Germany. Structure — Concentration Gerold Bliimle and Siegfried Hauser The Internationalization of Japan's and West Germany's Textile and Clothing Industries, 1970 - 1985 Werner Pascha The Economic Consequences of Government Deficit — The Japanese Case — Masaichi Mizuno
191
215 247
Interactions between the External Economy and the Fiscal and Monetary Policy of the Federal Republic of Germany, in View of Stabilization Policy Wolfgang Scherf and Alois Oberhauser Contributors
275 299
"Unternehmungsphilosophie11 -
Questions t o t h e Research o f Real Theory
Ralf-Bodo
A. At 1.
first:
The
today; it's
subject of the
theme
problems. what
which
The
in
is
my
opinion
suggests,
of
be
treated
these
can't
it's
however,
the very point
study
to
solution
theory.
scientific
rather
a
offer
a
to
A)
Therewith
it
exists
industrial world.
-
number
be p o s s i b l e task
of
a
of
here
and
generation,
program.
Nevertheless
by t h e r e s e a r c h m e t h o d s o f from
can
be
learn
my
point
formulated
of
as
view
of the
-
follows
the in
something from t h e h i s t o r y ?
a plurality
companies
They
economic
a
a
manner:
A r e we a b l e t o rate
causes
in question to explore the efficiency
interest
multidimensional
-
Schmidt
an " U n t e r n e h m u n g s p h l l o s o p h i e " real
a n d Human C o n c e p t
didn't
fortune,
and
chronicles
of
trading-houses
only but
of try
also
to
all
prove
their
At
any
important over
soundly
(attendant)
the their
"social
engagement". Regarding
to
my p r e v i o u s
won't
have
three
reasons:
1)
The
a
great
statements
emphasize ties,
in
that
they
addressed
studies
success
"rejoice",
successes, the
sense
don't to
a
Science".
like
by V i c t o r
Kraft
this
because
of
path of
that
particularly "public
meet t h e
of
the
research following
means of
relations"
and
"Historical in
with
demands w h i c h h a v e t o Research
As
A
t h e y were r e q u i r e d under t h i s latest
they
personali-
1955.
be
Strict title
2
2)
It
exists
help -
of
as
hardly
any
which t h e
elements
of
an
can be measured. result
as
"concepts
scientific
long of
of
think
as
the
with
ethical
of
the
values
such an
normativisms
world";
Instrumentarium
insufficiently
material
"Unternehmungsphllosophie"-
We d i d n ' t
testing
several
statistic
effectiveness
moulded
furthermore
lacked
developed
exact
because
theory
the
of
of
the
social
sciences.
3)
It
seems
to
be
sure,
that
mungsphilosophien"
can't
conditions
company
social
of
the
environment
-
"experienced
be
copied, -
as
B)
Confirming
this
corresponding propagated tion; and
general
was
lacking
means like
therefore
for
example
concept
were
formation,
as
to error
in
1)
To
outline
the
recommending
2)
To
normativismof
instruc-
that
several
ethical
justice,
humanity
characterized
by
a
operationalization of
lack and
the
of
time-
interest
prognosticai
and
pragmatical
t h e o r y h a s t o compound t o it
s h o u l d be a b o u t
possible
"Unternehmungsphilosophien" this
that-
formulas.
Pursueing the explanatory, to this
a
liberty,
s u c h empty
Corresponding
in
personal
added
of
n o t t o m e n t i o n an a n a l y s i s
science a r e a l
basic
time.
content
in
goal of
most
be
orientation; following
active
lapse of
it's
the
self-realization
precise
C)
to
action
that
postulates
argument
because
always
well
human c o n c e p t s c h a n g e i n t h e
Unterneh-
important
content with
criteria
now: of
the of
facts.
alternative intention
of
efficiency
in
context. address
theory.
questions
to
the
research
of
real
3
2.
In
international
literature
"Philosophy
of
the
"Culture
of
the
company".
cogent
business
-
appearance also
-
of
(Wertbasis)
in
what
respect
its
prove
the
If
"ethical
values"
following
it
t o what e x t e n t of
s h o u l d be
i n which respect bilder") which
value are
environment,
and
basis
there
is
of and
(ethische
"human c o n c e p t s "
"ethical
values"
in
the
Secondly:
Figure
1
values
culture
at
Werte) in
the
that
"Unternehmungsphilosophie11
an
obey,
the
by
real
which
theory
they -
-
are
interpreted subjected
to
refutation.
the
"ünternehmungsphilosophie11
relation
(Wertrahmen),
system.
of value,
to
of
of
tensions
between
On t h e one h a n d t h e company i s p u t
area
company
in
The t e r m
shows
valuation.
social
patterns
will
("Menschenand
be m a i n t a i n e d ,
offered
are
decisions
(ethische
goals
it
attempts
Werte)
company.
Subsequent t o t h i s ,
be
values
talk
achievement.
hypothesis
of
i s whether
of goal
as
less
and
different the
or
the
company's d e c i s i o n s
could
of
more
a and
asked,
instrumental
Alternative
B.
-
i n t h e g o a l s and t h e c o m p a n y ' s
goal achievement,
to
Identy"
leadership,
then the question
connected w i t h t h e occurences w i t h i n t h e In the
of
social -
making.
"Unternehmungsphilosophie", in
terms
principles in
references
"Corporate
superficially
decision
find
to
These
enterprise
very
we
and
principles,
the
though
firm",
and
is
Within
which
granted this
(Unternehmungsträger) which are
depends by
the
the
influential
express
concretized
on legal,
value
in a the
framework particular
economic members
individual
and
of
and the
conceptions
i n t h e g o a l s and measures
of
4
goal its
achievement?
style.
On t h e
value
these
respects with
other
a
of
question
and
is
awareness
formal
the
most
structure
the
respective
Then because chosen
by a i m i n g a t "will"
of value tion
der
of
(Sollen),
and v a l u a t i o n
to the
instrumentation company.
the
form
but of
Values
value
the may
application
of
conditioned
by
of
policy
could
etc. shows
followed includes
company
members.
of mutual
that is
In
a lack
the in
of
an a t t e m p t
In
that
acceptance" Western
congruence
the
organiza-
to
influence
(Wertinstrumentalisierung)
connection
goals
for
be
it's
not
an e f f e c t - o r i e n t a t e d "
in
traineeships
and v a l u a t i o n
Akzeptanz).
there
the
general
but which e q u a l l y
of
fact
with
his
disposition.
are
value
the the
latter
result
leads to a migration
of
this
in
The
which
a "philosophy
respectively In
part
in
Therefore
sufficient
order, of
gegenseitigen
the
How:
are
1 permits
values,
the
which
correspond
with
liberty.
figure
of
corresponds
the
C.
investment
programs
economic
on
system
compatible
also
"Unternehmungsphilosophie"
members,
"dogmatic,
is
whether
a "should"
(Wollen)
(Philosophie
life.
or
polarization
r e s p e c t we c o u l d t a l k world t h i s
sharing
arrangement
valid
their
could
and
of
on
(Wertverwirklichung) of
and
leadership
organization
social
justice
ethical
the
the
conceptions
professional
varying
profit
depends
of
a different
The
a
of
in the
of
which
sphere
profit
height
members
values
training
of
necessitate
a
of
liberty,
conceptions
the
but also
Assuming
private
whether
of
the
these
conception
in-service
in
results,
value.
realization
employee's
that
hand,
individualism
professional
and
example
of d i s p o s i t i o n ,
decision
conceptions
a
for
possibilities
and i n
the
a
question
in of
a
acceptance.
goal
achievement
of
the
company 1.
One
essential
of
values
in
problem
goals
and
of
this
measures
study of
is
goal
the
delimitation
achievement.
Only
5
the
subjective
perception
t i o n members e n a b l e s a A)
If
we t a k e ,
assume
above
would
investment
values
the
motives
all,
rather
are
the
for
the
source
of
and r e s u l t
profit
goals
result
of
It
is
to
consumer
and
A
are
the
average
wishes
As
high
distributions
profit-making, from
the
high
of
results
from
this
-
of
for
example
job
l o s s and l o s s o f
liberal and
cash
prefers
high
be
is
be
judged-
of
of
in
trading
however,
capital
can a l s o be
for
retained,
Such a s e c u r i t y
against
may b e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h
of
the
affected
presented
to
organization a
feed-back
is
making o f
t h e company.
Employment e n s u r e s a
corresponding
personality
in
obvious
the
member,
a
of
the
"liberty".
profit
development
to
sphere.
recipients
liberty
that
corresponding
also
expression
procures
may
managers of
might
demand
valuing
an
risk-provision.
feeling
and form
this
can
as
institution.
a company,
for
relation
in the private
profit
the as
profit
t h e company a s a n
The p r o f i t
of
developso f a r
i n which t h e r e
liberty
profit-making
viewpoint
financial Apart
of
than which
development.
the
for
can be s a t i s f i e d ,
be seen an e x p r e s s i o n
in
shareholder
reason
funds
Result
employees in
and
development,
This
to
dividend,
reserve
result
that
we've
managers
connected
sharing
plausible
result,
dispositions.
supposed profit
distribution dividends.
of
a c h i e v e d can be u s e d .
be
high
organiza-
sharing,
result
also help to value the goals of
welcome
the
employees,
value
disposition
only the r e s u l t
by
financial
wage and a c c u m u l a t i o n
the ment
these
a s one g o a l ,
that,
investors
of
valuation.
high
contrast
free to
unemployment.
The
problem
of
subjective
becomes p a r t i c u l a r l y of
profit
and
loss
apparent sharing,
conceptions when s e t t l i n g accumulation
of
justice
the of
quotas
open
and
6
hidden reserves
as w e l l
investments
expansions
ments,
in
research,
further
individual
goals
t h e employee t h a t of
result.
unknown,
but
is
an
the
it
it's
The c h o i c e o f
for
field
of
to
as
mention
technologies,
a
of high sales the
linked
with
employment
is
and
capital
discovered
in
justice, for
if
the
supply,
2.
In
this
study
achievement
Organizational help
of
impossible authorities regulated tions"
formation
different
procedural
as
presuppose
range to
of
to
of
of
the
the
well
as the
growth
guarantee
can the
also
be
company; and
value
policy
which
planning.
in connection
company's
with
organization.
company
is
managed w i t h
the
from
the
structural
and
organization;
so of
efficiency
and t h e in
position,
of
duties
far these to
"mono-linear-organization"
that
and
success
market
a selling
the
instruct
liberty.
products
quality
of values
instruments
measure
to in
limited
individual of
Values
field
to profit
the discovery is
its
product
dominant p a r t s
would be d i s a d v a n t a g e o u s
a
volumes.
investment.
marketing
market
money a r e
and
goal
achieve
personal
company's
this,
by far
represent
new
The
which
goal
of
so
product
practice
due t o t h e a c h i e v e m e n t of
is
company t o
also
to the
countries.
expression
but
to
employment
activities
creation
advertising,
consolidation
of
Western
to
group
than
strategy
commercial
possible
the
by
suggested
and q u a l i t a t i v e
policy
A
case,
the net value,
security
application
self-realization We've
the
the
is
of
I n Japan t h i s
Selling
this
i s more i m p o r t a n t
known i n s e v e r a l
instrument
varied
for
quantitative
result.
it
for
invest-
training.
in
distorted
the distribution
retaining
the
that,
"justice",
o f wage p a y m e n t s
appropriation
profits
and i n - s e r v i c e
one-sidely
to
of
rationalization
shows
are
Referring
the benefit
and
traineeship
investigation
agencies.
B)
as t h e r e t e n t i o n
authoritarian
organization
members
it
follow
and
has
been
aspects. which
"job
leadership possess
The are
descripstyle specific
7
qualities are
of p e r s o n a l i t y .
implied with
"participative In
with
the
is
any
there
profile in
leadership
connection
whether
of v a l u a t i o n
today's
economic
ferten)
instrumented that
an
which
are
organizational
D. A t 1.
fourth;
Different
and
of should
is
be
company a s p l a c e
partly
This
type
what's
mobility
capital-giver;
is
of
have
needs
a direct
the
to
also
the
high
wish
company.
for The
short-term personal
the
and
in
demands
company's
development.
exclude
"peripheral
that
a more
exact
"achievement
man"
by
trying
that, In
contrast
income
to
a to
this
finance
his
Depending
on
level
aspiration
he
of
to
and p a r t l y
to
valid
t o t h e company i s
dividends of
make
professional
a long-term c a p i t a l
motives
to
he's willing
tendency.
analogically
relation for
of
valuation
primarily
individual
combined w i t h t h e d e s i r e
becomes
by v a r y i n g
between
t e n d s more t o company l o y a l i t y
differentiation
it
possible.
of
clear
achievement.
according and
(Wertof-
valuation
personal
not
because
he
value a
not
characterized of
asked
man".
doesn't
more
ambitions
professional
of
with
and
need
be
on one h a n d ,
is
face
made
company a n d ,
real
to
and " p r i v a t e
principally
the
and
particular
However,
goals
income
these
change
personal
in
also
the
between
r e s e a r c h makes i t
in
priorities;
company.
face
career
second
the
granting
Empirical
personality
b e l o n g i n g t o e v e r y man
offers
separation
are
of
(Leistungsmensch)
the
and t h e
human c o n c e p t s c h a r a c t e r i z e d
typification
firs t
(Wertungsprofil) by
could
between
Hum»™ r v m c e p t s a n d p a t t e r n s
differentiation
The
it
similarity
instrumented
expectations
groups".
organization
exact
of
"divisionalization"
m e a s u r e s on t h e o t h e r
possibilities The
qualities
style".
world
evident values
Different
"goal arrangement",
the
entices
change.
for
the
regularly
investment, a change
capital-giver
of are
8
particularly
acute
phllosophie", tion. man
In or
("staff
so
far
as
he
shares") in
can
of
act
ity
of the
man, in
adapt
niques.
Without firm,
employee
promote
or
less
to
It's
ening or
as
burdensome
just.
highest
financially
only of
his
secondary
the
company.
forces
to
him
tech-
who i s that
loyal
than
the
be supposed
that
in the p o s s i b i l i t y therefore
-
The
organization
accept
Private
regard
anyway of
"criteria
effected.
in organization
style.
he d o e s n ' t
up a s l i m i t a t i o n s
less
liberty
personality,
if
of
the
especially,
change.
leadership
restriction strategy
company member,
feel
to
this
goal
has
severe
man,
readiness
With
formation
to
authoritarian -
possibil-
share
willing
might
judge
intention
the
for
usually
and j u s t i c e
the
the
the
also market
the
more
who t e n d s
from
m i g h t be v a l u e d a s
the
doubt
is
making a c a r e e r ,
company
-
in
strict
offer duty,
him.
income l e v e l ,
a c h i e v e m e n t man w i l l which
the
"Unterneh-
organization
of
of
organization
more
to
the
the
of
of
consideration.
result
combines
however,
the
to
employee
formulation
but also to accept the
which
Though h i s d e s i r e d to
achievement and
place t o the achievement
acitivity
besides
interest
participa-
because
which
the
sense
a c h i e v e m e n t man -
private
the
into
which
first
surely
success"
as
explained
fields,
demands
profits,
favoured of
in
private
company
of
investor
on t h e m a r k e t ,
responsibility,
possible
be
Concerning
techniques,
however,
some
"Unternehmungs-
a b l e t o comply w i t h t h e s e c o n c e p t i o n s
of promotion
take
must
an
interpreted
should also t a k e
aggressively
which,
of
activities
both
interest
manners.
leadership
be
Being
company
The company i s
to
also
the
("Belegschaftsaktien")
division
different
formation
enter
man.
the
mungsphllosophie" A)
the
they
private
objectives possible
for
when
the
techniques also
man,
and so,
in
an
however,
activity
organizational liberty
of
in
the
tightas
more
9
The of
organization techniques,
view
-
intend
community" side
theory
which to
from
of
create
leadership,
leadership
In
style"
supposed
that
loyal
the
this
has
both
scope o f
are connected, shouldn't
to
plural
Result
and
the
to
and
participating interpreted
a
important
now
on
the
wages, when
wide
individual fixes
basis
salaries he's
member, refuse towards
a
high cuts
interests
loyal
to to
salary, to
promoting g r e a t e r
the
of
doubted.
change but
he It
far
of
of
as
the
member
organizational
and
justice,
priority
be
of
theoretically
liberty
doesn't
might
besides
company is
in
company.
fir m,
security.
so
sharing,
the
advantage
field
conceptions
of
with
and c a s h p r o f i t
prepared
who's
of
conceptions
his
of
the
world
conception
man
literature
in
of
economic
Because extremely
sense
German
has a monetary
payment.
private
common
represents
The c o n f l u e n c e
the
his
However,
competence
which
be
to
justice
second
it
company
to
Herewith
this. of
be
man,
seems
sense o f
shift a
measures o r systems o f of
it
techniques.
especially
motivation
in
up
that
could
private
a
one.
seems
contentment
It
and
"Unternehmungsphilosophie",
in that
non-material two
man
causes
the
of
all and
"cooperative
o f m o t i v a t i o n have t o be of
element
at
"delegation
a
and s t r o n g e r
duty?
effects
becomes v i s i b l e the
the
considered.
leadership
overlooked
technical
isn't
to
of
"achievement the
c o n c e r n e d more t h a n
liberty
disposition
formative
be
authorities
proves t h a t
which
point
aiming a t motivation
relation
to
are
of
from
w h i c h may b e a r e a s o n f o r be
responsibility
B)
sense
achievement
firm,
Instrumentarium
connection,
in
be t h e case w i t h s t r i c t
it
a
they're
decision-making"
a larger
wide
sociological
however,
to that,
self-realizatio n.
to
a
the
(Leistungsgemeinschaft),
contradictory of
offers
-
high
company
the
well
result
the
on
particular
The in
his
least
disposed retentions
becomes c r i t i c a l ,
if
the
10 company
makes
employee" achievement whole
firm,
loss. at
in
successful, the
a
should
another
if
it
is
cuts
in
result of
The
income.
So i t
result
The
payment of
satisfactory
for
refuse
if
to
Some
in
the
another
same
the
"Unternehconcept
of
and
reductions
the
retentions improving
in
of
comparatively
his
in
to
security and
company,
and the
the
result profit
liberty
needs
company,
won't invest-
rather
argue
against
his
strong
whereas him
of the
"job-hopper"
the
retentions
a higher
achievement. if
However,
non-material
because
offers
of
to
with
confronted with r e s u l t
company
his
participation
finance.
concerning
to
which
He a l s o a g r e e s
competition
material
potency,
of
made in
orientated
if
alternatives
a
market
he a l s o m i g h t
chances
income
These
company
has
and
attitudes
to
overcome
loss.
statements
the research of
to
accepting
an a
efforts,
E · And now: Q u e s t i o n s t o t h e r e s e a r c h o f 1.
by
of
the
reflected.
investments
sensitively
increase
be
measures
desires
because
is
man,
expansion,
situations
of
readiness
be
this
agreement
position
only
loyal
that
and a l s o
special
are
should
if
rationalization reacts
his
On a c c o u n t
in
is
liberty
value
he
require
achievement
ments
may
dividends,
nuances
retention,
and
who
extensions
favour
man
justice
innovations
sharing.
which
Naturally,
conceptions
some
of
can
include
settled, in
"changing place
liquidity.
achievement
unusual
also
in
elements
and
differently.
the
This
becomes c l e a r
s h o u l d be
the
better
i n t h e company a n d n o t
employee
must
disposition,
result
the
for
company.
a crisis
industry.
expenses
and
look
probably maintains his usual
mungsphllosophie" of
Theoretically,
once
real
proceed theory:
the
real
development
of
theory questions
to
11
A)
"Philosophies"
are
(Wertsysteme) .
Having
one o r a n o t h e r
system o f
t h i n k i n g of B)
The v a l u e s and g o a l leading
instrumented
critical involved
to
systems
this
norms i s
or
value
to
follow
incompatible with
in the decisions which
can be
alternative
mungsphilosophie",
of
that
the
rationalism.
achievement, idea of
accept
of goal
characters
appear
attainment
combined of
under
an
one
"Unterneh-
as
offers
of
subjective
are
specialities.
valuation. C)
"Unternehmungsphilosophien"
e v e r y one h a s t o b e s u b j e c t e d t o a D)
The " U n t e r n e h m u n g s p h i l o s o p h i e " prosperity ment the
of
of
the
economic
contributions
company's
possible.
of
result
Nevertheless,
mungsphilosophie" disfavour
of
unity.
the
market
An i s o l a t e d
individual
generally
doesn't
the
should c o n t r i b u t e
the
is
Each
it
to
the
measure-
components
acknowledged
efficincy depend
like
and
trial.
of
on
an
the
may b e
of not
"Unterneh-
goodwill
or
the
of
in
case
products. E)
In
this
context
fact
has
to
such
for
example
be
however "be
to
scientifically
prove if
they
from
Europe
Numerous
to
conditions,
"principles weight wage
-
style,
of
prove
to
the
or
why do
or
which social job
they
Hongkong?
existence
career
training,
valuesemigrate
-
regulation
policy,
decisions,
in-service
such
the
leadership"
salary in
times
as
impossible
Why d i d p e o p l e
former
address
and
of
the
represent
it's
may b e i n B e r l i n
researches
participation
leadership
in
as i t
empirical
so-called
rightness
-
postulates
liberty"
Without doubt the
America
accentuated
ethical
"grant
instrumented.
"walls",
different tures,
are
that
just",
empty f o r m u l a s .
even
certainly
mentioned
so-called
jump o v e r F)
-
of with
of
job
expendi-
conditions, security,
12
behaviour support
in
of
etc.
Without
like
for
lity"
competition,
welfare doubt
example
which
environmental
institutions, ethical
values
"liberty",
otherwise
-
in detail.
in their
These b e h a v i o u r a l to
such
by
from
the
the
the
company's
research
reproach
profit",
hence
value",
it
recourse
to
to
ethical
-
can
theory.
them as
-
be
To
there, -
can
studied recently
tested
protect
as
them
increasing
"genuine there
the
referring
to
required
to
scientifically if
jobs
"responsibi-
instrumentation
formulas
values,
new
hidden
and
recommendations
real
be
of
what has t o be
culture
"empty
prove
seems
to
of
of
are
"justice"
â l s o be i n a c o m p e t i n g r e l a t i o n , assigned
protection,
creation
is
talk
about
"Unternehmungsphllosophie".
However,
the
trial
phllosophie" posesses
can
be
cooperative according demand
to
adaption
content
and m e a s u r e s by
the
a
style
and
of
of
of of
of
forces"
goal a
profit
Only
lapse of
this
and
the
way
values
time,
with
which
"philosophy
of
a
sharing a is
necessities
consideration,
in
that
satisfy
in
and
worth
achievement;
instrumented
in the
into
that
identified
employment
control
meaning-
statement
and/or
justice.
taken
"parallelogram
sense
definite
period
released
is
"Unternehmungslexical
the
done
valuation
are
in
goals
processes
fact
an
strict
v a l u e s can be o b v i o u s l y
liberty
subjective
that
required
leadership
for
possible, the
the
ethical
company's
this
presupposes
in
information
following the
-
of
which
I
call mutual
acceptance". "Unternehmungsphilosophien"
differ
from
differences
values
-
of
traditional
the
corresponding
the
variety
nuances crossing
in of
particular
of
instrumentation
culture
time,
not
areas. at
civilization, in
the
last what
European
-
Human
and
by
the
with
that
by
caused
by
what
is
concepts
evoked the past and
others
by
the
undergo border
has t o u g h t
Pacific
us,
sphere.
13
Therewith
the
request
confirms
"Unternehmungsphilosophien11 "trial
and
be
the
a
difference
daring
philosophien"
in
might
the
I)
The
research
is
which
as
the
play
the
offered
referring
to
the
important
employee as
of
creative
in
the
supposition
of
leadership
collective,
what
the
on
the of
of
the
and
by
"principle
and
"loyality".
corresponds
losophie11
to with
prove regard
of
to
the
the
versions
to
their
Germany,
the
and
the
subjectsystem
of
rationality",
the
of
"role
of
company"
as
unions".
It
exists
practiced
manner
is
beared
by
stability-orentated and
risk
avoidance;
seniority",
proceeding of
following
"preservation
companies
harmony
employment"
It
to
similar
concepts
progress",
immediately
accompanied
rationalism
Related
"Nation's
T h i s h a s a l s o t o be t e s t e d by t h e r e a l 2.
also
business
like
human
"spirit
Japanese
causes
change
studies
for
orientation that
of
potential",
"fight
in
one.
"up-to-date
homogeneous
thinking,
German
part:
the group",
"company
but
Japanese
interaction
virtue",
harmony",
of
"Unternehmungsphilosophien"
this
an
their
research
economical,
actual
In
"development
well
the
of
it
interdisciplinary
the
processes
"religious
exploring
Japan has passed t h r o u g h
both.
surely
familiar
as
people",
interests.
concern
well
of
for
-
value",
include
question
acceptance typical
factors
by
"Unternehmungs-
empirical
profitable
only
interest
historical-political the
tested
and
copy
manner;
of
a
questions
administration
with
individual
be
"land to
and s o c i o p o l i t i c a l
raised
the
way
represent
concern which d o e s n ' t historical
of
undertaking
in a transferring
effectiveness causes
that
to
error" .
Remembering might
itself
have
the
efficiency.
"lifehold
theory. of
the
critical
"UnternehmungsphiFrom a
theoreti-
14
cal
as
well
regarding available A)
as
practical
the
present
for
of
of
view
two
academic
possibilitiesfindings
-
are
this:
Firstly,
the
thinkable,
establishment
in
instrumented is
point
level
which in
described
the
of
suitable
valuation
goals
and measures
the
organization
by
which t h e mediate r e g i s t r a t i o n
of
of of
indicators ethical
goal
is
values
achievement
members,
and
with
realized values
takes
place. B)
Secondly, values
the
by
information To A) :
First
immediate
applying is
of
ascertainment
corresponding
of
realized
methods
to
gain
possible.
all
the
potential
indicators
are
worthy
of
attention. The f o l l o w i n g -
job
-
working
-
labour
s h o u l d be
satisfaction, atmosphere, performance,
-
productivity,
-
reasons,
-
rate
1)
of
job
The
considered:
frequency
and d u r a t i o n
of
absenteeism
fluctuation.
satisfaction
indicator
includes
the
values
embodied
"Unternehmungsphilosophie"
insufficiently.
satisfaction
summarily
only
anticipations accordingly another
reflects
cherished
nonful filment
that
and
of
certain of
satisfaction
including
the
relation
measures.
Second,
the
fulfilment
by a n o r g a n i z a t i o n
compensated
anticipation
job
a
the
by isn't of
That
of
an job of The
can
be
overfulfilment
of
means,
easily
value
degree
member.
anticipation the
value.
in
First,
suitable
between job
therefore, for
particular satisfaction
15
doesn't what's al's
only
show
more,
the
fulfilment of
liberty
of
or of
working
an
-
and i t s
goals"
is
concerning
-
but
individu-
Examining
for
is accordingly
the
example
of
problematic.
that
satisfaction
however,
satisfaction
atmosphere
f i r m member a n d t h e
With
job
atmosphere,
because
expected. value
value,
the
with
is
latter
is
established
also
apply
the
working Whereas
factor an
to
of
findings
supplementation.
individual
a
component
the
one
an
represents
the
organization
r e g a r d e d as an i m p o r t a n t
indicator.
job
one all
atmosphere
" T h e bond b e t w e e n t h e this
is
individual
justice
of
realizing
v a l u e s whose f u l f i l m e n t
realization
2)
the
extent
factor,
related
aggregation
working
to
of
groups;
individual
"microclimates". The
measurement
difficulties this
as
respect
of
a working
is
the
we've
case
to
atmosphere with
return
job
to
labour performance
Measuring
labour
comparatively mental
satisfaction.
nature. tion phie"
of
performance
performance,
Drawing
a
and if
in
values
embodied
however,
phenomenon.
in
productivity
one
refrains
particular
conclusion
and p r o d u c t i v i t y
causes,
In
measure
productivity
unproblematic,
work
performance
and
similar
operational
s t a n d a r d s when e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e c o m p l e x 3)
poses
on to
the
greater
the the
of
nature degree
is from
creative of
of
labour realiza-
"Unternehmungsphllosodifficulties.
4)absenteeisms Finding ee's
out
the
absence
substantial
frequency
causes
some
information
and
duration
of
difficulties. concerning
the
the
employ-
However,
if
degree
of
16
realization
of values
for
observable
If
the
extent
of
absence
is
g l o b a l manner,
a v a l u a t i o n of
phie"
be
couldn't
particular 5)
rate
of
reflections
questions
have
or
invalidity
out
in
a
"Unternehmungsphilosoinfluences
in
consideration.
if
questioning
its
it
to
of
the
this
if
is
indicator.
in
as
notice
c a u s e d by family
be
aimed
far is
as
on
a
external addition,
attributed
to
the
values.
procedure
is
the
realization
attempt
of
to
individual
"Unternehmungsphilosophie11.
the in
if
has
this
mediately by
for
necessary
marriage,
it
to
are
answered,
basis,
realization
alternative
values
reasons
exactly.
found
external
are v a l i d
be
like
or
insufficient
determine
to
forced
circumstances,
An
an the
differentiations
voluntary
B) :
so t h e
fluctuation
course,
the
assessed,
merely
have t o be t a k e n i n t o
Corresponding Of
To
s h o u l d be deduced,
absence have t o be r e g i s t e r e d
varying versions
The
i s t o be t a k e n
into
consideration.
3.
So
tions the
far to
the of
have
An
of
real to
the evaluation A)
of
such
the find
to
one
step
you'll
find
in the
of
without
following
is
necessary
to
concepestimate
"Unternehmungsphilosophie". to
the
further
preparation
The
questions
as w e l l
as
to
studies.
of
leadership"
which
fundamental
i s confronted with
be a s s i g n e d
surely
1906
nevertheless
an
theory
exegesis
the
but
Instrumentarium
efficiency
research which
fragmentai
manifold
existing
elements the doubt
formulation
of
ethical
explanatory the of
"principles values
is
proceeding.
So
expression a
sphere of the o p t i c a l
status,
of
of
justice
in
established
in
industry:
17
" I n t h e case of every
time
employment
without
regard
d o m i n a t i o n and t h e p a r t y Whereas
the
following
single-plant successful the
it the
in
concern
is
has be
proceeded
extraction,
the
membership."
statement
bargaining
motor
..· to
which
1983 less
comes
of
a
"genuine
from
a
worldwide
referring
to
value": "For
the
economic
job security
it
success
and e f f i c i e n t
this
that
Nevertheless
company
all
manner.
company
necessary
Under t h e t i t l e
same
"Human R e l a t i o n s "
the
its
company most
has
long
important on
secure
the
in
recognized
resource
a favorable
employees is
act
job
are
is
c a n be
left
heard
importance:
that
people
environment
that
will
a
for
and
are
and h a s e n d e a v o r e d
and s t a b l e
philosophy
his
all in
principles."
like
f r o m a J a p a n e s e company w i t h a w o r l d w i d e
provide
that
how t h i s h a s t o b e done c o n c r e t e l y extent.
the
A precondition
members
i n accordance w i t h t h e
open t o a l a r g e
"The
and
company members w o r k t o g e t h e r
trustful treated
the
is particularly
male and f e m a l e is
of
an
to
for
its
employee
who
perform
to
his
best
various
programs
capabilities." "The the
company h a s benefit
programs, insurance and
of a
implemented employees.
hospital,
program,
facilities
activities. established
a
for
include
housing
comprehensive
health
pension
plan,
cultural
Educational for
These
a
programs
employees."
for
a
and
cooperative recreational
have
also
been
18
Faced
with
feeling
that
that
beginning,
we
the
problems,
relation:
man -
fulfil
able
company.
an
theory
link
consulting
seems
to
be
Concerning
the
estimation
nehmungsphilosophie" the
technique question can't under
listed of
function,
in
between
assembly l i n e "
C)
The
solution
because based
the
on m e t a - e c o n o m i c values.
economically Evaluating
idea;
what of
Singapore
develop to
goals the
"R&D
a
which
study
my
remarks
plant
of
of
the
course
difference an
-individualists
organization
of
members
seem t o
of
we s h o u l d
in
the
this
interdisciplinary,
these is
be
are
founded
the
help
of
requested.
start
Siemens i n P r e t o r i a ,
and
-
kind
is
by t h e
project
at
to
hand.
problem
For
"Unter-
a "Muslim team of
educated psychologists
this
i n Katowice, in
the
to
an
"Unternehmungsphilosophie11
on t h e o t h e r
valuations
on e t h i c a l
D)
of
tested.
necessary
on one h a n d and t h e
Silicon Valley"
lexical
of
mentalities
a la
practice.
strict
addition
to
especially
undoubtly and
the
has
efficiency
In
most
explana-
the
departmentally
leading
the
the
the
of
of
an
differentiated
one u n i t e d
exists
if
of
t h e y can be
indicators
forced
its
is
questioning.
is
be
it
one o f
the
at
the theory
ahead
-
from
stands
between
science,
m e a n i n g - m u s t be c r e a t e d b e f o r e
refine
resist
classification
On t h e
goal of
important
the
the
"Unternehmungsphilosophien"
B)
to
administration
namely
and p r a g m a t i c a l
since
not
regarding to the solution of
important tory
are
business
e.g.
on a
in
a
mine
joint-venture
Hewlett-Packard
in
Germany . 4.
The
theme
"Questions "demands". Weber
of
to
the
research
The i n d i v i d u a l
postulated
knowledge he
in
follows.
the In
was of
scientist right
intentionally:
theory",
has t o d e c i d e
way
any c a s e
called
real
it
-
which
and -
like
path
seems t o me f o r
to a
not Max gain long
19
time
that
sense o f
the
ruling
mungsphllosophie" to
now?
doctrine
the nepclassic. to
the
is
too
mechanistic
S h o u l d we e v e n l e a v e t h e normativism
which
is
in
the
"Unterneh-
foundered
up
20
Figure 1
Values in the Relation of Tensions between Realization of Values and Valuation
Entrepreneurshlp:
Management
and C o r p o r a t e Tamiki
Contingency
Theory
adaptation that
the
to
its
has
situational
But
differently,
external
is
and
over
the
factors
between
organizational
and p r o p o s e d a
organizational
have
led
to
maintained
uncertainty,
structure,
argued
factors it
Strategy
Kishida
situational
suitability
its
Ideology
that
technology,
organizational
the
variables
high
the
and
performance.
congruence
strategy, process
thesis
among
organizational
results
in
high
performance. Here,
however,
coherence
is
stressed.
For
the
example,
take different in
treating
take
identity or
two
strategies
strategy. which
to
is
The its
firms
latter
a
especially
of
factors
order
innovation
1· The
i n the changing
Entrepreneurshlp idea
of
development Schumpeter.
and
For
first him,
of
this
may
Thus,
we h a v e
to
means
organizational
in
the
the
by
corporate
which
The
make
the
culture firm
can
of
the
function is
the
to
firm
and
accomodate bring
about
situations.
innovation
fully
as
a vital
elaborated
factor in
entrepreneurshlp
recombination of p r e e x i s t i n g outcome
adaptation,
entrepreneur to
entrepreneurshlp was
same s i t u a t i o n
ideology
means
the
is
management
change.
executive,
in
the
or
former is
or
change
t o adapt t o change.
reflected
these
two
in
both
situational
identity
organizational
change
The
mainly
organizational
i n order
consideration
climate.
adapt
of
though
organizational
into
corporate
problem
neglected,
factors
recombination
cannot
the
in work
was
the
economic of
J.A. novel
o f p r o d u c t i o n where clearly
be
the
predicted.
22
It
refers
to
Individuals they
carry
tion
of
of
or
efforts
process
are
is,
in their
elements
has
devoted
been the
the
and
in
side
entrepreneurship,
analyze example,
psychological
rare,
means to
find
talent,
persons
achievement.
former when
asserts
latter
observes
demand
for
requisite Scholars
in
the
are
cultural
on t h e
he
of
the in
a
of
cultural
it
a
of
foster
or
a
For
range
high
is
need
abundant.
activity is
will
emerge is
focusing
the
market
unless
on b o t h t h e
the
supply
supply
both supply
culture,
the
and The
present.
assume t h a t
society's
for
emerge
while
an economic
not
of
sociological
incentives,
will
inhibit
and
entrepreneurship
opportunities group,
trait
entrepreneurial
orientation
when t h e r e
is
people.
wide
of
called
side
supply
entrepreneurship
supply
entrepreneurship,
codes
These
focusing
that
economic
even
functions
encour-
Psychological,
entrepreneurial
sociocultural
a n d demand o f demand
what
sufficient that
deal
groups:
generated
entrepreneurship, of
factors
development
natural
demand
what
are
as,
combina-
A great
i n t h e economic group and
the
person. far
a new
the
measures
the entrepreneurial
there
four
its
(1961)
with
emphasize
assume t h a t
a so
entrepreneurship.
group,
develop
the
Scholars
gaging of
assume
fostering
McClelland
studies
group
and
of
in
production.
to
into
not
and
sociological.
Scholars
relatively
when,
experience,
of
exercise
roughly divided
economic,
of
innovation, only
existing
impeding
cultural,
of
entrepreneurs
out what
the
research
aging
a
are
and
and
show
how
and demand
for
entrepreneurship . In
general,
increasing of
it
is
pointed
entrepreneurially
the
demand
manipulating 1981). because
out
entrepreneurship
is
oriented
and
opportunity
social
structures
However,
both
"external
supply
factors
that not
the
crucial
creating
individuals, for and
and
but
rewards are
are
increasing
(R.A. to
of
supply
entrepreneurship
demand
(demand)
means
a larger
be
conditions
by
Peterson, stressed of
change
23
and
internal
former in
that
of
the
t o change. factors.
It
internal see
in
through
ideology,
the
following
2.1
Hitachi
The
Hitachi
ideal
engineer
into
graduate
of
Under
firms, of
They
organized
Hitachi.
top
Namihei
Kodaira
freely.
specialties
were
Environmental ideal
were
First
The
foreign
machineries.
independent earthquake
war
activities
to a
was
Namahei
made i n
(Hitachi-ism
or
that
Kodairaand
ideology,
World
realize with
an
the
many
ideal. was
Japanese
Here
leader
from
This
War
and
opened of
destroyed
up
the the
Great
an
almost
all
of who
their
different
in the
of
Kanto
from
opportunity
technologies
a
ideal.
maturation
firms
of
formed.
development
talents
Japanese
a
become p r e s i d e n t s
common m i s s i o n
encouraged
His
Japan.
"faithfulness"
a typical
diverse
prevented
1923
by
a l l o w i n g h i s members t o p r o p o s e
development in
with
Thus
quake.
will
University.
i n t e g r a t e d u n d e r t h e common
factors
the
Tokyo
management
management
remained a c o o r d i n a t o r opinions
of
Hitachi
together
engineers
toward We
strategy.
1910
technology
"harmony", this
in
some o f whom l a t e r
gathered
young
founded
development
spirit".
and
and T o y o t a
and
engineers,
other
of
two
strategy,
innovation.
the entrpreneurial
was
"frontier
adapt
members
value
excellent
to
conditions
guiding
ideology
the
external
order
external
combined
as
team
and
in
corporate
are
summarized
and
Therefore,
who accommodates t h e s e
the
chapters
independent
is
coherence
the
Matsushita,
The management ism)
to
change
1937).
important
entrepreneurshlp
corporation
an
was
are
of
(Mao,
t o management i d e o l o g y a n d c o r p o r a t e
Hitachi vs.
Kodaira,
bases
internal
adaptation
integration,
in relation
2.
the
are
latter"
is the entrepreneur
of
management
both
the
organization
Thus,
means
(supply)
through
sense,
control
the
factors
operates
the
Earth-
importing for
Japan. factories
the The in
24
Tokyo, all,
the
factories
of
and o r d e r s
but
rushed t o
Hitachi.
The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s as
received
the corporate
strategy
no
damage
at
in Hitachi
are
about e v a l u a t i o n
and
follows.
Firstly,
t o p management makes d e c i s i o n s
support
of
proposals
management
makes
company-wide investment sector,
priority in
the
of
in
1970s
the
the it
Thirdly,
level. In
heavy
to
institute
1950s,
electronics controls to
the
business
influences
activities the
the
equipment
the
according
and
top
long-range
the
management
utilized
and d e v e l o p m e n t
research
of
electrical
shifted top
Secondly,
priority
t o p management e x e r c i s e s
research
central
factory
in
resources
Fourthly,
company-wide
the
allocation.
was
the
sector.
amount
cycles.
on
changes
resource
but
appliances total
of
of
Hitachi
on
the
especially
Hitachi
research
center. In general,
t h e common v a l u e o f t h e t o p management r e f e r s
the
orientation
strong
there
seems
corporate
to
be
strategy
of high technology
2.2
agreement to allocate
technology
that
this
development,
is
the
through
ideology
a
corporation,
industrialist"
society
was justice
always
realized
founder recognized
of
Matsushita
in
1932
the
field
based
on
production. to his
Thus
reconcile belief
the
behavior
of
and e x p a n d e d when p r o d u c t s
the of
industrialist employees,
and
became they
to
the
market
suitable
the
of our
management
profit-making
that
n e e d s o f t h e masses w e r e s o l d i n a n a p p r o p r i a t e mission
electric
"mission
by w h i c h i s m e a n t t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n abundant
established
social
the
appropriate
resources mainly t o the
products.
Matsushita,
applicances
The
to and
Matsushita
Konosuke the
towards
for
with was the
way. foundation
voluntarily
of held
25
meetings
to
discuss
resulted
in
the
tionalized
as
"father"
of
recession dismiss tion
a
1929,
among
inventory electric
Konosuke
employee
in
and
hours
two
that
The
was
In
the
he
would
although
by h a l f .
enhanced,
not
producresult,
away
demand
was a l s o
the great
As a
sweeping
sustained
This
institu-
the
for
home
fortunate.
of the business p o l i c y
at
Matsushita
follows.
Firstly,
is
appliances brought
the
specialization
industry.
high
business
resources, that
that
not
could
t h e computer
fully
the
circumstances
slacks
the proper Fourth
is
emphasizes
not
understood
electric
specialization
utilizing capital.
enter
and
in that
quickly
equipment,
and p r o d u c t
certain He
also
into
any
field
did
not
enter
thus
only
firms
are
when
they
capital,
able
to
have
personnel,
cope
enough
inventory,
development.
characteristic
is
the
proper
management
based
on
profit. the
financially
financial
and t h e r e s e r v e
rate
healthiness;
is the establishment
total
marketing.
The
i n d e p e n d e n t management.
and e q u i t y
Fifth
special
that
and
would
dam management
i n terms of
third
asserted
t h e home
industry.
Secondly,
technology
for
intensively
technology,
with
its
by
Matsushita be
policy
Konosuke
performance
maintained
The
reduced
it.
later
Konosuke
salary,
s i n c e W o r l d War I
characteristics
a r e as
full
was
months.
appliances
The s i x
were
realize
was
community. decided
paid
employees
which
event.
pseudo-family
and w o r k i n g
cohesion
meeting"
company-wide
the
of
an
t h e m i s s i o n and how t o
"morning
financial are very
cost
role
of
is
low
system
and
high.
o f t h e mass p r o d u c t i o n
network
a n d most i m p o r t a n t
the
ratio
Matsushita
affiliated
shops
to the sales
power.
plays
a
26
The
sixth
is,
in
the
a
sense,
element
of
revenue
and e x p e n d i t u r e
nal
organization
the
idea
that
In
comparing ideal
family the
2.3 In
and t h e This
performance
a
as
the
a
core
in
the
decisio-
is
based
whole
Konosuke
strategy
former
technology
R&D a b i l i t y .
with
The
lies
on
rises
efficiently.
with
from t h e computer
as
and
industry
is
The l a t t e r a
big
the
as a n
on
strategy
is
a
father,
short-term
serves
based
oriented
pseudo-
stressing
profit.
The
example.
Toyota the
there
above
each
company.
Toyota
We
will
relationship
Motor
rather
now
of the
Corporation,
invented
Toyota
family.
the
The
succession
(1)
Risaburo Toyota
1950),
(3)
of
Taizo
(1961-1967),
(5)
(1982-
Ki-ichiro,
the
a
(entrepre-
a
strategy
longitudinal,
representative
Toyota, loom
of
(1937-1941), Eiji
combination and c o r p o r a t e
or
Toyota
whose f a t h e r
and
became
Toyota Motor (2)
(4)
a
Sakichi of
Corporation
is
Toyota
Bukio
(1967-1982)
of
symbol
Ki-ichiro
(1950-1961),
firm
and
(1941-
Nakagawa Sho-ichiro
). founder,
production
of
innovator.
Ishida,
business
automatic
Ishida
analysis,
examine
also
presidents
synchronic
combination.
was f o u n d e d by K i - i c h i r o
Toyota
Toyota
and
b e t w e e n management i d e o l o g y
diachronic
Japan,
comparative
e x i s t e d a u n i q u e and s u c c e s s f u l
neurship) in
by p r o d u c t
and M a t s u s h i t a ,
long-range
oriented
optimization.
to the product.
corporate
Hitachi
community
sales
exit
control
i s managed
community
emphasizing
local
system o f M a t s u s h i t a
according
the
when e a c h u n i t
the
a
management
contributed
automobiles
in
Japan.
a professional
opportunities
and
all
He was
manager,
promoted
his an
life
to
the
enthusiastic
took advantage
investment
of
actively.
27
Nakagawa who was c o o p t e d f r o m t h e M i t s u i s y s t e m c r e a t e d by I s h i d a . Corporation
and t h e
and e l a b o r a t i o n down. the
example) all Here the
Toyota
has
Group
directed
division
into
we w i l l case
of
Principles
the Toyota
through the
the
the
risk
the
Motor
reorganization
aversion
new T o y o t a
manufacturing
toward environmental
t h e Toyota
bank m a i n t a i n e d
rationalized
o f management s y s t e m ,
Sho-ichiro sales
Eiji
and
cost
( t h e merger division
of
is
an
a d a p t i o n and an i n t e g r a t i o n
of
group. examine
the
Ki-ichiro by
change
in
and I s h i d a ,
management
in
relation
ideology
to
the
in
Toyota
Sakioki.
The p r i n c i p l e s
are
as
1.
We s h o u l d w o r k
2.
We
3.
We
4.
We
irrespective should
creation
follows:
diligently
of
to
contribute
our
nation,
rank.
give
all
of
our
attention
in order to take the
should
to
not
be
to
lead over
pompous,
rather
research
and
time.
simple
and
have
fortitude. should
be
kind
and
friendly
and
create
a
friendly
atmosphere. 5.
We s h o u l d r e s p e c t God and l i v e of K i - i c h i r o 7 s
The t r a i t tic
idealist
Japan.
mission
nation,
relating was
information this
led
to
the
Toyota
production
and
gratitude.
of
an
enthusias-
components
principles
3,
and
was
with
needs
machinery
automobile
4,
R&D
later no
were to
style
rational
also the
the
to
the
the
second
of
active
Furthermore production and
in
establishment
and
cultivating examples.
humanistic
the
buying
The
such
in
that
reflected
inventory
department
relate
Next,
promotion. the
quantity.
makers 5
of
belief
contributed
mamagement
the
instance, in
the
principle.
the
system
materials
industrial
first by
establishment
for
by
automobiles
the
collection
to
which,
the
was t h a t
enhanced
of
natured
system required
was
production
principle
of
w i t h a m i s s i o n o f p r o d u c i n g a u t o m o b i l e s made
This
domestic
character
a life
of the The
management
28
b a s e d on t h e c o m m u n i t y c o n s c i o u s n e s s . important
business
employees to
through
establish
activities
a
family
To K i - i c h i r o ,
were
cohesion,
à paternalistic
to
to
the
most
integrate
the
develop Toyota,
community w i t h
strong
and
solidar-
ity.
Taizo
Ishida
developed
seven p o i n t s :
(1)
intelligence (3)
rustic
the
these
establishment
and a b i l i t y ,
mind,
sufficiency,
(4)
(6)
principles
(2)
of
into
industry
good p r o d u c t s
indomitable
cooperation
fighting
and
the
following
by
Japanese
a n d good
spirit,
harmony,
ideas,
(5)
(7)
self-
personnel
education.
Closely first
corresponding point
which
to
the
first
parallels
to
principle
p r o d u c i n g a u t o m o b i l e s made i n J a p a n . "Protect the
your
castle
independent
encouraged
spirit
of
yourself"
added t o
investment
development turn
by
in
parallels
to
the
Ishida's is
the
a to
(equipment latter
sentence
t h e age o f
motorization.
Ishida's
second quality
the
Ishida.
third
refers
resulted
principle
a
basis
training experiences Fourthly,
production
of
the
relates
independent
of
This
the
former
employees'
on t h e in
the
(self-sufficiency)
in
second toward
part
suggestion
to
the
oriented
without
personnel
of
of
the
system
for
costs.
cost
organization
of
of
Ishida
investment
to the
in
spirit.
rustic
T h i s shows t h e way T o y o t a men s h o u l d w o r k . using
rationalized the
This
improvement and c u t t i n g
Thirdly, means
second p o i n t
principle.
version
breed
The M o t o m a c h i p l a n t was a p r i o r
of
own o p i n i o n
supremacy).
principle.
Next,
Ishida's
mission
revised
fighting
equipment
technology
is
Ki-ichiro's
abilities
in
Namely
management
redundancy.
education
mind
the
through
This form
in it and
is
also
of
the
repetitive
spot. case
of
Ishida,
the
independent
was e x t e n d e d t o t h e T o y o t a g r o u p
spirit in
order
29
to
emphasize
ships of In
the
the
summary,
tributed
independent
compared
to
the
with
the organization
of the Toyota
chapter,
entrepreneurship deal
with
firms,
the
Ki-ichiro
Toyota,
and
relation-
family
Ishida
and
of
established
and T o y o t a
group.
entrepreneurship
focusing
on t h e no d e b t
financial
will
analyzed.
first
be
observations
and i n t h e t h i r d
con-
stabilization
long term marketing,
No d e b t management a n d
In this
interdependent
rationalization
management b a s e d on t h e
3.
yet
group.
of
section,
The
no
debt
no d e b t
strategy,
two
small
sections
and
large
firms
and no d e b t s m a l l and medium
firms
medium will
be
examined.
3.1 Questionnaire We
sent
firms
out
in
a
1981.
answered our In
all,
the
firms
they
sales
less
within
are the
general
than
300
increasing local
area
are
independent
There
are
two t y p e s
debt?
before
crisis.
the
There firms
arrived
at
small
and
medium
and medium f i r m s ,
are
million each
and
exports
402
also
consciously
no d e b t
small
follows.
First
is
30-99,
though
less
are
not
than
and
annual
these
three
Transactions
when t h e
crisis
two t y p e s aiming
no d e b t w i t h o u t
as
are
done
performed.
Most
subcontractors.
regarding oil
the
is is
yen,
year.
of
Capital
employees
and n o t
first
research
established.
t h e number o f
firms
debt?
debt
description
shown i n t h e
were u s u a l l y
yen,
are
no
questions.
30 m i l l i o n indices
to
Among 8 2 1 no d e b t s m a l l
conclusion,
and medium of
questionnaire
of at
firm
and
first
after
processes no
debt
h a v i n g had i t
the
leading
and
as a
became first
firms
goal.
no oil
to
no
which
30
The
most
influential
"retained the
earnings"
advantages
burden"
and
of of
most
(1)
more
presidents
perhaps
result the in
of
from
(2)
sales
though inclined
No
firms
debt
190
are
165
"passive
when
the
where
are
debt
department at
80
presidents of
many
of
came
no
debt
cases
100
practice
and of
a
while debt
presidents
from
manufac-
borrowing
whenever
established
presidents, Both
in
the
when
by
the
from
his
77
presidents
borrowing
were
policy.
president
firms.
presidents
as
manufacturing
second
founding
This
b e c o m i n g no
among
from
the
firms,
environment,
a d h e r e n c e t o t h e no d e b t
of
selected
among
case
of
from
the
needed
was
on
academic
31 firms
the
borrowing
policy
careers.
and medium
to
firms
interview.
are not o r i e n t e d towards d i v e r s i f i c a t i o n
specialized a
agreed
their
w i t h no d e b t s m a l l
Most f i r m s about
firms,
unconscious
practice
presidents
presidents
Interview
are
among
cases
the
on.
respective
We r a n d o m l y
debt
aimed
cost.
the
conscious
and a
from m a n u f a c t u r i n g .
the
for
payment
induces
borrowing
uncertain
in
the
no
sales
the
or
relatives, Many
the
are
In
turn
were
Therefore
interest
in
of
in
president
founding
agreed
(1)
119
debt
equipment.
department
in
slightly
relatives.
3.2
and
agreed
and
sales
curtail
needed,
the
policy
presidents
because
to
founding
(3)
from
manufacturing
turing
a
conscious
less
"small This
no
profit".
style".
coping w i t h
order
the
of
" l o o s e management"
have
the
are
becoming
rate
are
management
with
and t h e r e is
debt
needed i n p l a n t
Compared
for
"high
management".
firms
is
a
no d e b t ,
and c o n s e r v a t i v e
investment
no
"stable
disadvantages
However,
reasons
and
in
reduction
their of
own
cost
business or
area,
employees
but
bringing (G-l,
L) ,
31
averting
the
investment
subcontractors J. (2)
M,
0,
needed.
of
However,
difference
those
the
conditions
with
its
own
(which
advantage
(1)
the
product
no
a
One
is
debt
are
in
the
firms, In
many
whether
debt
of
policy
firm
takes
rather
two
Both
more
firms were
to
where coopted
recover
from
debt.
of
small
and
with
field,
Here
and
is
medium
mottes
of
the
firm
within
this
proceeded.
firms are the conditions
reasons and
to
the
bring
about
development
the cost
management cases,
on
investment sources
are
orientation.
earnings
is
depends
the
order
innovation
research
another
debt
arises.
banks,
"defender"
narrow
two
no
no
were
outside.
large
and r a t i o n a l
sales a b i l i t y , In
in
the need
banks.
characteristics
and p r o c e s s
There
reflected.
with
party
strategy
w i t h no d e b t
debt.
the
There
and s o l i d i t y
specialized
profit. (2)
the
is
much
important
healthiness)
from
so
not
regarding
are
not
makes
and t h e y b o t h a d h e r e t o no
High p r o f i t no
or
manufacturing
a trade
above,
Interview
to the
firm
through
(U,W,Y).
came
or
management
specialty,
from
when
whenever
steadiness"
is
adhere
are
whether
coming
firms
usually
of (I,
mottoes
and
no d e b t
the transactions
bank
As d e s c r i b e d debt
use
borrowing
there
the
without banks
oriented
bankruptcy,
to
whether
financial
presidents a
that borrow
adheres as
or
of
Presidents
from
the
presidents'
sense,
firms
funds
implies
solidity
this
with
information,
the
for
"faithfulness
which
firm
such
connections
3.3
In
between
and
Whether
balanced
most
management",
"solidity".
the
by
Y).
policy
is
equipment
and i m p r o v i n g t h e p r o c e s s
t h e need
and
no
in
R, W ) ,
2 5 among 3 1 r e c o g n i z e d "balanced
(3)
(G,
of
high
(R&D)
and
reduction.
personality founder
or
is the
highly current
32
president
has
dislikes (3)
Those
firms
dominant In
the
case
business
no
(matured
management a
balanced
borrow
the
management
money w h e n e v e r
large
firms,
emphasizing s t a b i l i t y
debt
select
of
or
needed
are
number. no d e b t
expanding i n t o In
motto
that
in of
mainstream,
a
borrowing.
industry)
a new f i e l d
firms,
the
employs rational
on
(retained
earnings), in
order
the
following
strategic
one
two
in the
hand,
aspects
brings
is
main
actively
are
evident;
in
about
management
integrate
type
hand.
decision-making
which
and to
analyzer"
and e f f i c i e n c y
on t h e o t h e r
pattern
leadership
"the
order
high
personality
members
on
to
profits
the
and
company
level.
4.
Summary a n d c o n c l u d i n g
The r o l e
of
remarks
entrepreneurship
i n combining c o r p o r a t e
w i t h management i d e o l o g y was a n a l y z e d . a
means
by
conditions. ing
which
identity
tions
of
Namihei
firm
adapts
ideology
among members.
t h e s e two f a c t o r s Kodaira,
Matsushita, Hitachi,
a
Management
a
the
corporate
a
of
management strategy
ideology
the
management
ideology
corporate
strategy
combined
into
these
two
of of
is,
for
of
find
new
short
ideal
external maintaincombina-
and
Konosuke
community
Matsushita
sales The
and
the
community
profit
under
difference in the
the
also,
orientation
reflected
In
technology
combined under
In
term
is
innovation.
pseudo-family
Konosuke.
example,
of
were e n t r e p r e n e u r s .
Kodaira.
the
the
long-range
stressing
successful
leadership
firms
of
in
strategy
strategy
role
Hitachi,
and s u c c e s s f u l l y
entrepreneurship
charismatic
of
emphasizing
the
the
Entrepreneurs
Matsushita,
development are u n i q u e l y symbolic
changes
plays
t o b r i n g about
founder
founder
to
Corporate
and are the
between different
33
policy
adopted
regarding
the
entry
into
the
computer
unique
combination
industry. In
successful
management strategic
no
the
the
merchant's
allowed
(solidity)
when
it
with and
However,
trait,
meaning
useful
to
the
appropriate
was
no
of
observed.
debt
For
strategy
are
t h e y a r e combined
entrepreneurship
is
the
analyzer)
supremacy
contradictory.
under
a
(defender,
equipment
superficially Toyota-ism
firms,
ideology patterns
example,
Go-shu
debt
of
Taizo
active
the
firm
Ishida
into as
investment
or
the
a is
corporate
group. Many
problems
scope
of
remain,
entrepreneurship by
teams.
design
glance,
is
for
suitable
is
discover
organization.
an
the
a
way
It of
the
to
that
four
and
increase
ways and
stage
of
at
which
franchising, are,
the
stage
formalization,
combining
at
of
an
a
innovation appropriate
innovation
designing
to
entrepreneurial
decentralization)
may b e a r o l e
the from
implemented
with
the so-called between
in
change
organization
implementation high
attempt
emerging.
is
organizations;
initiation for
the
department,
difference
specialization,
Recently
structure
into
low f o r m a l i z a t i o n ,
structure
(low
is it
individuals argues
This relates
the
the
specialization,
to
in
Entrepreneurship
that
structure
which Namely
entrepreneurial
contradictory.
dilemma,
of
(1981)
entrepreneurship
organization.
tion) .
matured
Peterson
contracting,
tion
one
entrepreneurship.
of
(high and
the
innova-
centralizaambidextrous
entrepreneurship
entrepreneurship
and
34
References HOFER,
C.W./SCHEMDEL,
Concepts, MAO TSE-TUNG: McCLELLAND, MILES,
West,
Practice
D.C.:
PETERSON,
D.C.:
SATO,
Y.:
Faculty
of
K.,
Starbuck
Consideration Kyoyobu
Kiyo
Education) OGAWA ,
(No D e b t F i r m s ) ,
E.,
1952
Van N o s t r a n d , Strategy,
1961
Structure,
1978 Chu-ko Shinsho,
and O r g a n i z a t i o n ,
(eds.):
Handbook o f
Oxford U n i v e r s i t y
Daigaku
TAKIZAWA,
Analytical
O-tsuki-shoten,
Organizational
Entrepreneurship
Design, A
Formulation:
and M a t s u s h i t a .
N y s t r o m and W.H. tional
and P a r a d o x .
McGraw-Hill,
Hitachi
R,A.:
Strategy
The A c h i e v i n g S o c i e t y .
R.E./8NOW,
and P r o c e s s . OKAMOTO, Y · :
D. : 1978
on
Press,
Management
(Bulletin
of
Nagoya/Japan, a n d MAKIDO,
Yu-hikaku,
1985
in:
P.C.
Organiza-
1981 Ideology,
Nagoya Vol. T.:
1979
29,
Nagoya
University's 1985
Mu-shakkin
Kigyo
35
Table 1:
A Ocnparison o f Various Authors' Concepts o f Strategy and t h e Strategy Formulation Process
Chandler
Andrews
broad
broad
strategy
strategy
Components o f Broad Concept of Strategy
goals objectives a c t i o n plans resource allocations
goals policies plans
Name f o r Goals & Objectives
goals & objectives
goals & objectives
objectives & constraints
result strategy
Characteristics of Objectives
none specified
none specified
attributes yardsticks goals
attributes indices t a r g e t s & time t i e d t o action strategies
strategy
composite or business strategy
Breadth o f Strategy Def i n i t i o n / C o n œ p t Name f o r Broad Concept o f Strategy
Name f o r Narrow Concept Strategy
Names for Functional Strategies & Policies
Differentiates between Goals & Objectives & Constraints
(continued on next page)
Cannon
narrow
product mark e t scope growth vector none competitive speci f ied advantage synergy
Components of Narrow Concept Strategy
Name f o r Implementation Plans
Ansoff
action strategy
policies
policies
action plans
plans
programs
coitimi tment strategy
no
no
yes
no
36
(Table 1 continued) D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between Corporate Level & Business Level Strategies D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between Goal Formulation Processes & Strategy Formulation Processes D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between A n a l y t i c a l & Organizat i o n a l Aspects of t h e Startegy Formulation
no
no
yes, implicity
yes implicity
no
no
yes
no
does not discuss either
does not discuss organization a l aspects
yes
yes
Continue Table 1
Katz
Ackoff
Breadth o f Strategy Def inition/Concept
broad
does not recognize concept
Name o f Broad Concept o f Strategy
corporate strategy
master strategy
Components o f Broad Concept of Strategy
scope deployments specifications
services technology objectives synergy strategic sequencing posture & timing targets
Name f o r Goals & Objectives
specifica- objectitions & ves & s t r a t e g i c goals criteria
Characteristics o f Objectives
none specified
Name o f Narrow Concept Strategy
scope
(continued on next page)
specified
McNichols
Newman & Logan
broad
goals & objectives
specified root strategy
Uyeterhoeven et. al. both broad & narrow strategy
targets
goals & objectives
none specified
specified strategic posture
37
(Table 1 continued) services technology synergy sequencing & timing
scope competitive posture s e l f concept
Components o f Narrow Concept Strategy
none specified
none specified
Names f o r Functional Strategies & Policies
functional policies policies
operating f u n c t i o n a l functional startegy policies strategies & policies & policies
Name f o r Implementation Plans
deployments
programs, procedures master & courses p l a n of action
programs & plans
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
Differentiates between Goals & Objectives & Constraints D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between Corporate Level & Business Level Strategies D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between Goal Formulation Processes & Strategy Formulation Processes D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between A n a l y t i c a l & Organizat i o n a l Aspects o f t h e Startegy Formulation
(Continued on next page)
does not discuss organizational aspects
yes
does not discuss organizational aspects
yes
no, but does recognize different organizational levels
no
does not discuss organizational aspects
38
(Table 1 continued)
Breadth o f Strategy Definition/Concept
Paine & Naumes
Glueck
Steiner & Miner
Hofer & Schendel
narrcw
narrcw
broad
narrow
χ
master strategy
grand design
χ
missions purposes objectives policies
objectives strategy policies
purposes & objectives
goals & objectives
Name f o r Broad Concept o f Strategy Components o f Broad Concept o f Strategy Name f o r Goals & Objectives
objectives
objectives
Characteristics o f Objectives
none specified
differentiates between official & operative
none specified
attributes indices targets time
Name f o r Narrow Concept Strategy
overall startegy
strategy
program startegy
corporate or business strategy
Components o f Narrow Concept Startegy
none specified
none specified
none specified
domain or scope resource deployments competitive advantage synergy
Names f o r Functional Strategies & Policies
policies
functional policies
functional strategies & policies
functional strategies & policies
Name f o r Implementation Plans
programs & roles
plans & programs
programs & plans
plans o f action
D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between Goals & Objectives & Constraints
between objectives & constraints
no
no
yes
yes, i n places
yes
D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between Corporate Level & Business Level no Strategies (continued on next page)
39
(Table 1 continued) D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between Goal Formulation Processes & Strategy Formulation Processes D i f f e r e n t i a t e s between A n a l y t i c a l & Organi z a t i o n a l Aspects of t h e Strategy Formulation
not explicitly
yes
yes, i n places
yes
no
no
yes
yes
Source; C. W. Hofer, D. Schendel: Strategy Formulation; A n a l y t i c a l Concepts. West, 1978
40
Table 2: Characteristics of the Defender Entrepreneurial problem
Engineering problem
Administrative problem
Problem: HCM t o "seal o f f " a p o r t i o n o f t h e t o t a l market t o create a stable set o f products and customers
Problem: HCM t o produce and d i s t r i b u t e goods or services as e f f i c i e n t l y as possible
Problem: Hew t o maintain s t r i c t cont r o l o f t h e organization i n order t o ensure e f f i c i e n c y
Solutions: 1. Narrow and s t a b l e domain 2. Aggressive mainte nance o f domain ( e . g . , competitive p r i c i n g and e x c e l l e n t customer service) 3. Tendency of ignore developments o u t side o f domain 4. Cautious and i n c r e mental growth p r i m a r i l y through mark e t penetration 5. Some product d e v e l opment, but c l o s e l y r e l a t e d t o current goods or services
Solutions: 1. C o s t - e f f i c i e n t technology 2 . Single core t e c h nology 3. Tendency tcward v e r t i c a l integration 4 . Continuous improvements i n technology t o maint a i n efficiency
Solutions: 1. F i n a n c i a l and production experts most powerful members o f t h e dominant coalition; limited environmental scanning 2. Tenure o f dominant c o a l i t i o n i s lengthy; promotions from w i t h i n 3. Planning i s i n t e n s i v e , c o s t - o r i e n t e d , and comp l e t e d before a c t i o n i s taken 4. Tendency toward f u n c t i o nal structure with extensive d i v i s i o n of labor and high degree o f formalization 5. C e n t r a l i z e d control and long-looped v e r t i c a l i n formation systems 6. Simple coordination mechanisms and c o n f l i c t s resolved through h i e r a r c h i c a l channels 7. Organizational performance measured against previous years; reward system favors production and finance
Costs and b e n e f i t s : Technological e f f i ciency i s c e n t r a l t o organizational p e r formance, but heavy investment i n t h i s area requires technol o g i c a l problems t o Costs and b e n e f i t s : I t i s d i f f i c u l t f o r com- remain f a m i l i a r and p e t i t o r s t o dislodge t h e p r e d i c t a b l e f o r lengthy periods of organization from i t s small niche i n t h e indus- time t r y , but a major s h i f t i n the market could t h r e a t en s u r v i v a l
Costs and b e n e f i t s : Administrative system i s i d e a l l y s u i t e d t o maintain s t a b i l i t y and e f f i c i e n c y but i s not w e l l s u i t e d t o l o c a t ing and responding t o new product or market opportunities
Source: R. E. M i l e s , D. C. Snew: Organizational Strategy. Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, 1978
41
Table
: Characteristics of the
er
Entrepreneurial problem
Engineering problem
Administrative problem
Problem: Hew t o l o c a t e and exp l o i t new product and market opportunities w h i l e simultaneously maintaining a f i r m base o f t r a d i t i o n a l products and customers
Problem: How t o be e f f i c i e n t i n s t a b l e portions of t h e domain and f l e x i b l e i n changing p o r tions
Problem: How t o d i f f e r e n t i a t e t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n ' s s t r u c t u r e and processes t o accommodate both s t a b l e and dynamic areas o f operation
Solutions: 1. Dual technological core ( s t a b l e and f l e x i b l e component) 2. Large and i n f l u e n t i a l applied t o search group 3. Moderate degree of technical e f f i ciency
Solutions: 1. Marketing and applied r e search most i n f l u e n t i a l members o f dominant coal i t i o n , followed closely by production 2. I n t e n s i v e planning between marketing and production concerning s t a b l e p o r t i o n o f domain; comprehensive planning a mong marketing, applied research, and product managers concerning new products and markets 3. M a t r i x s t r u c t u r e comb i n i n g both functional d i v i s i o n s and product groups 4. Moderately c e n t r a l i z e d c o n t r o l system w i t h v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l feedback loops 5. Extremely complex and expensive coordination mechanisms; some c o n f l i c t r e s o l u t i o n through product managers, some through normal h i e r a r c h i c a l channels 6. Performance appraisal based on both e f f e c t i v e ness and e f f i c i e n c y measures, most rewards t o marketing and applied r e search Costs and b e n e f i t s : Administrative system i s i d e a l l y s u i t e d t o balance s t a b i l i t y and f l e x i b i l i t y , but i f t h i s balance i s l o s t , i t may be d i f f i c u l t t o r e store e q u i l i b r i u m
Solutions: 1. Hybrid domain t h a t i s both s t a b l e and changing 2. Surveilance mechanisms mostly l i m i t e d t o marketing; some research and d e v e l opment 3. Steady growth through market pene t i a t i o n and product market development Costs and b e n e f i t s : Low investment i n r e search and development, combined w i t h i m i t a t i o n o f demonstrab l y successful products, minimizes r i s k , but domain must be o p t i m a l l y balanced a t a l l times between s t a b i l i t y and flexibility
Source: Miles/Snow,
ibid.
Costs and b e n e f i t s : D i a l technological core i s able t o serve hybrid s t a b l e changing domain, but the technology can never be completely e f f e c t i v e or e f f i c i e n t
42
Table 4: Characteristics of the Prospector Entrepreneurial problem
Engineering problem
Administrative problem
Problem: Hew t o l o c a t e and e x p l o i t new product and market opportunities
Problem: Hew t o avoid oang term commitments t o a s i n g l e technologic a l process
Problem: Hew t o f a c i l i t a t e and coord i n a t e numerous and diverse operations
Solutions: 1. Broad and continuously developing domain 2. Monitors wide range o f environmental cond i t i o n s and events 3. Creates change i n t h e industry 4. Growth through produ c t and market d e v e l opment 5. Growth may occur i n spurts
Solutions: 1. F l e x i b l e p r o t o t y p i c a l technologies 2. M u l t i p l e technologies 3. Lew degree o f r o u t i n i z a t i o n and mechanization ; technology embedded i n people
Costs and b e n e f i t s : Technological f l e x i b i l i t y permits a r a p i d Costs and b e n e f i t s : response t o a changProduct and market i n ing domain, but t h e novation protects t h e o r - organization cannot g a n i z a t i o n from a chang- develop maximum e f ing environment, but t h e f i c i e n c y i n i t s producorganization runs t h e t i o n and d i s t r i b u t i o n r i s k of low p r o f i t a b i l i t y system because of and overextension of i t s m u l t i p l e technologies resources
Solutions: 1. Marketing and research and development experts most powerful members of t h e dominant c o a l i t i o n 2. Dominant c o a l i t i o n s i s l a r g e , diverse, and t r a n s i t o r y , many include an inner c i r c l e 3. Tenure dominant c o a l i t i o n not always lengthy, key managers may be h i r e d frati outside as w e l l as promoted from w i t h i n 4. Planning i s broad r a t h e r than i n t e n s i v e , problem oriented, and cannot be f i n a l i z e d before a c t i o n i s taken 5. Tendency toward product s t r u c t u r e w i t h low d i v i sion o f labor and low degree of f o r m a l i z a t i o n 6. Decentralized control and short-looped h o r i z o n t a l information systems 7. Complex coordination mechanisms and c o n f l i c t resolved through i n t e g r a tors 8. Organizational performance measured against import a n t competitors; reward system favors marketing and research and development Costs and b e n e f i t s : Administrative system i s i d e a l l y s u i t e d t o maintain f l e x i b i l i t y and e f f e c t i v e ness but may u n d e r u t i l i z e and m i s u t i l i z e resources
Source: Miles/Snow,
ibid.
Management o f a German S u b s i d i a r y -
Experiences,
Challenges,
Dieter
1.
Introductory
Japan
Solutions
-
Schneidewind
remarks
This contribution second
in
biggest
is
on S u c c e s s f u l Management i n J a p a n -
national
market
on
this
globe
(next
the
to
the
USA) . The
subject
manager
is
for
9
responsible years
in
(Foreign the
years
Board
the
German
the
as
a
history
competence
of
the
Head
an
of
a
University As
a
in
of
the
in hair-care world-market 37
capital. to
nil,
factories
After
before
the
is
can
look
a
and
a
another
8
at
from b o t h
our
FAC
sides:
from
in in
Japan,
will
tell
with
the
I
question
that
I
business Economics
attempt
to
i n Japan through
will
the
of
Asia
at
German/Swiss
Bochum
Ströher-Group,
some 8 5 0 M i o US $ t u r n o v e r ,
products, leaders around
the
and l i c e n s e
being together with L'Oreal
of
field.
We
than
50
this a
turnover of fees.
particular
globe
but
largest
sales
Wei l a predomi-
in the
all
Wella's
today
USA w i t h
US $ p r o f i t s
for the
companies,
Whereas it
in
commands
France
distribution
I
Japan
company
insider.
nantly have
in
for
As
Germany.
member
International
Operation
Asia/Pacific
president
the
lecturer
Japanese
market.
outside.
hammer o u t some g u i d e l i n e s eyes
consumer
Office,
former of
the
for
Company)
and f r o m t h e
Furthermore,
to
of
Member
Affiliated
inside
you
restricted
and
few
i n Japan
operation
more
with in
100
%
Wella
1 9 6 8 was
after
Germany
150 M i o US $ a n d n e a r l y
next and
15 M i o
44
2.
C a s e s t u d y o f a German b e a u t y & h e a l t h c a r e
2 . 1 The l o c a l
distributor
company
and t h e p r e p a r a t i o n
phase
(1969-1971) Wella
had
trade
to
in
appointed sell
exports
1968
the
its
of and
partner agreed
cosmetic products Dr.
industry,
Wella
July
Office
in
language
and
trade phies. books Japan
now
exceeds
over
the
cosmetic
an
import
of
customs
of
the
the
invaluable aquainted
country
(DKS's 2,500?
were
help
and
c o m m u n i t y and a l s o
and for
After
having 19 6 9 ,
in
of
the the
began items
as
by
and
immediately the
Japanese
personnel. well
as
introduction
of
every -
well-running
loyal
reading
books
people
The their
to
the
philososome
dealing
made many
hairdressers, bankers).
for
Soon
Japanese business
has
LuxemLiaison
Japan
learned
flanked he
a
August
products.
few
collection
among
in
partner
with
mid
his
company
employed s t a f f s
DKS a
of
mandatory
new
license
from
to
Wella
US $ .
by -
and b u l k s
local
training
addition
branch
activity
specially
couple
investment
7 months
as
laboratory
a
activities
Japan.
a
cosmetic
the
distributor's
Japanese
parent-company.
extended
These
local
served
from
products
and g e t t i n g on
the
with the
local
managers
president
$
and
German
senior
SA,
which
established
from
for
In
20,000
got
By
sales-promoter
after
Tokyo.
Bank
finished
the
in
with
importing
happen.
own
in
Fuji
distributor
not
his
years
US
developed together liaison-office
did
chair
increase
manufacturing
capitalized
250,000
pharmaceutical local
8
arrived
1969
Patmar
Japan,
in
German
status within the
paper-company,
Tokyo
a
after
and
26th,
established
Patmar
have
the barber
Japan.
bourg
borrowed
to
of
The e x p e c t e d
however
succeeded
(DKS),
joined
on
sales-promoter he
to
Schneidewind
period
distributor
hairdryers.
hair-preparations
local
hairdryer
a local
electric
friends from
400 with all the
45
An
enormous
amount
prospective government
offices,
joint-ventures, The
main
any a t
objective
highlight
the
time
Osaka
was
was
spent
in
and
also
partners
which
if
approaching the The
of
joint-venture
at
that
time
Expo
permitted
to
get
up
The f o r m a t i o n
this
period
1970
with
The
local
the
idea of
of
was
a
a 50:50
application
down.
because
another
DKS:
production
a
material for
maker
historical
objects
a
the
former
closest
managers.
In
sales-joint
both
and
chief
venture together was DKS.
not
with very
Japanese The
the
latter
friends
officers
been and
Factor
by
worked sales
on
for
the
the
were
the
from
vice
and
CEO,
the
side
but b i g morale
of
personal and
and
the
Japanese level
jointly.
This
or
production chose
his
presidents
head-office
joint-venture
president
stores
president
executives
German
by raw
company
drug
their
in,
out
cold-wave a
our
give
executive
chairmen,
the partner's
indirect
pleased to
pharmacies,
(CEO)
acting
from
its
v e n t u r e was w i t h a good
the
was
from
to turn
had
Osaka
and a German e x p a t r i a t e
chairman
and p o s s e s s e d
had an
like
ventures
in
was n o t
they
friend) ,
Max
one o f
of
good
Japanese
satisfying role
1972
with
outlets
DKS was
Nevertheless,
assumed him.
executive
party.
a
in
(1972)
joint-ventures
retail
facility
participation
and a s k e d M I T I
spring
company
(still
and p e r f u m e r i e s ; -
by
50:50
attention.
salon products
joint-venture
two
high-priced
friend
for
But
only
production
Wella's
joint-ventures
distributor
with
various
quantity.
c o s m e t i c museum, w h i c h g a i n e d n a t i o n w i d e
2.2
the
all.
1,000 ton production of
dealing
two
as d i r e c t o r s
for he good
under
salon-distribution
authority.
46
To
make
the
things
headquarters tion
at
company
individual
initial
partners
Due only
the
after
close-down
entire
2.3
of
of
liaison
nevertheless Japanese
fact
partner's US
rental
later
the
$.
DKS '
7 were
spartan
of
company by
the
holds Health
each g i v e n
product,
disastrous
for
the
with
-
only its to
3,000
US
short-term 150,000
office square
salary
occupied feet
the
received local be
very
people an
After
and 2
family.
The
corner
member
major out
of were
staff,
staff
incomes. consider
thus
years
of
of plus -
5
With
this
Wella
from
always
lavishly
no m a j o r
carried-
a
new
independent
i n the apartment
kitchen
the
rent
month
first
served
t h e b a t h r o o m and b a l c o n y a s w a r e h o u s e s , 4
%
another
which
$ per
inexhaustible,
company, up.
meager
did not
i n t h e Roppongi a r e a
embassy
still
a monthly
US
piled
100
w h i c h was
Also
$,
a
with
Also,
to
a
loans
US
1,000
the
$?
collaterals.
was
was r e n t e d Thai
course
7 0 0 US $ m o n t h l y .
multinational losses
of
1976.
125
first
was
(1973-1975)
Luxembourg m o t h e r ,
extended
room h o u s e d b o o k - k e e p i n g , a
own
screening
office
SA
its
accepted
liaison
beginning
spending
and
about
"Gods'
6 months
prove
liaison
amounting
women -
set-up
very
tory,
least
shade o f
Patmar
capitalized
office
fees
forward
of
p a i d b a c k by
Originally,
former
awarded
local
function,
unhappy
in
production
at
German produc-
different
a
of
the
preventive
are
would
of the
holding-company
completely
office
a
position
that
which
factory
role
Basel/Switzerland
the
with
only
each s i n g l e
a
1972
were i n c r e a s i n g l y
operation via
banks
Ströher
out
another
again
had
a period
office
Ströher/Wella
2 00
(for
of
operation.
The c e n t r a l
The
complicated end
self-supporting
to
and q u e s t i o n i n g a
founded,
cosmetic-licenses,
Ministry
the
This
growing
country". all
was
more
at
partners.
because t h e Wella's
even
least)
as
the
of
a
labora-
children's
t h e s t u d y - r o o m was o c c u p i e d by DKS logistics
were
in
the
parents'
47 bedroom,
and
the
living-room
s o m e t i m e s h o s t i n g up t o Despite
the
operation to
in
Patmar,
the of
50/50
tor) ;
Japan t o
all
sales
enabled
companies
sales
its
chief,
a an
able; and
to
he
in
the
first DKS
7
wife
returning
2.4
four
a
he d i d
not
desks
in
at
Headquarters
to
Darmstadt
countless two
called was
it
children
4
the
the
production not
was
always
comfortdifferent
hours
were
over
newly
100
erected
South-East 2
1/4
Asian
years
which
was
then
This
all
resulting
Tokyo
for
the
quickly good
in and
years.)
100 % c o n t r o l to
the
and
the
all
leaving
exactly
of
with
Itami.
After
polar-flights.
became c l e a r
that
due,
fields.
Hamamatsu-cho)
driver)
and on.
up
frequently
all
Countless
in
This
build
four
Y o y o g i and
stood
and
head-office
was
(no
desk
and
German
where
life
to
already
German
side,
office
staff-members
to
the
motor-car
t o Germany a f t e r
partner
all
relations
of
production
logistic
country
Itami-Airport.
frequently
and
time
to
only
Patmar.
funds
and
in the
(Roppongi,
The s h o r t p e r i o d o f n e a r
By t h e tion
by
marketing
addition
another
Regional were
visit
followed
the
from
sufficient
DKS'
went
subcontrac-
liaison
p e r y e a r b e t w e e n Haneda and
1973,
Singapore capitals
turn
between Osaka
riding
in
in
buy
sales
i n Tokyo
return-flights
to and
from
Also
hovered
near
(Later
salon
time.
three
one
spent
the
(using a
the
Weila-
Osaka-Factory
and t h e l i t t l e by
amicable In
place,
the
imports
the
bought
the
man
meeting
the
of
venture
courtesies
sides.
easy
offices,
in
marketing
delegated
be had
having
manufacturing
joint
own i d e n t i t y
friendly
side,
degree;
production
control
particularly gained
extended
have
to
the
DKS c o n t r o l l e d
joint-venture
had
complete
staff, Wella
a large
the
production
was
people.
ventures,
second p r o d u c t i o n they
both
joint
likewise
first the
45
powerful
DKS and W e l l a h a d a l m o s t
(1976) salon
distribu-
complete
control
48 over
their
any
Japanese
access
to
production rented
operation
production
joint-venture
Osaka
Factory
TV-maker's
of
refused.
took
the
on
suit
due
to
a
that
the
other
b o t h companies paid
% of
two
joint
Max
all
holding
DKS
operation in a
to
bankrupt
To t h e
personnel and o f
years
of
M i o US $ f o r
Wella
also
was
in
the
the
-
the
stood
firm
plant
was
-
for
all
total
Wella
course a l l
struggles
% charge
in
and
the the
production
the
% of the
of the
rest. from
loyal
built
at
a
behind Ibaragi-
Eight
Japan w i t h of
of
amount).
friends
from
law
shares
100
10 M i o US $ .
over
surprise
came t o
100
of Japanese p a r t n e r s
hard
backing the
arbitration,
and
majority
side
-
Airport
an
the
against
rejected
ruled
large
opened
demanded;
demand o f d o u b l e t h i s
sales
a
was
(salon-route)
operation
were
operation
7
the
unpleasant.
judge
and
2.5
their
retail
Narita
The
evidence,
volume
The p a r t i c i p a t i o n
After
first
partners)?
The German h e a d - o f f i c e ,
Overnight
months
later
studios.
2.5
be p a i d
sales
8
design sales
side
Factor
offices
% of
of
the
branch 90
former
gain
invade
s i d e demanded a t r i a l
challenge.
lack
easily.
Within
near the
the
plant;
Fortunately former
the
operations
The o t h e r
(against
their
production
DKS.
by
not the
to
70 km f r o m T o k y o ,
DKS, b a s e d on m i s m a n a g e m e n t .
70
forced
o u t and t r i e d
m e e t i n g became e x t r e m e l y
Dissolution
Patmar
they
could
plant.
German s i d e DKS,
they
t h e whole manufacturing
Prefecture,
The s h a r e h o l d e r s '
up
that
formulas,
partner
(owned
c o u n t e r e d by r e l o c a t i n g the Sano/Tochigi
and
sales
modern
former
agent,
former
staff
hair joint
remained.
(1977-1980)
Wella
Japan
Group
was
independent. However
the
hazardous lity,
8,5
owners' %; a n
and p r u d e n t
equity
of
this
1 1 M i o US $ b a n k
cash-management
group
had
loan,
assured
shrunk
high
to
a
profitabi-
survival.
Instead
49
of
the
head
became
office
a true
now
leading
hairdressers,
(nearly
100
partners
shares.
The
capital
key p o s i t i o n tion
felt
and i t
of
their
Japanese
group
was o p e r a t e d
was
colleagues
association's
but
with
an
an
in
company's
everyone
with the
rewarded
key
of
this
as W e l l a
the
with
a
image,
a
with
functions,
the
management
and
philosophy.
partnership
the
a
sitting
Western
of behavior by
with
international executives
in
organiza-
and
appointment
of
its their
Japan v i c e - p r e s i d e n t
of
the
division.
T h i s was a l l Bank t o
e n d o r s e d by p e r s u a d i n g M i t s u b i s h i
each t a k e
over
roughly
5 % of
thus making t h e o p e r a t i o n p o l i t i c a l l y
2 . 6 A m a l g a m a t i o n and c o n s o l i d a t i o n On J u l y office
1, to
Africa,
1978, be
the
and
successor
DKS was board
was
University whereas
Baker
Sendai.
the
member
old
a
the
Factor
the of
partner
friend
in
Tokyo
became
finance
and
sales/marketing
the
organization
success
such
made
it
as
logistics,
services, attractive
EDP to
and h i g h l y
personnel, and
and
a
Imperial
president.
well-functioning, legal
His
a s c h a i r m a n and CEO,
Whereas
services
Asia,
group.
growing
istration,
head-
Pacific,
whole
rapidly
production,
shares,
German
company was h i t h e r t o reasonably
Fuji
invulnerable.
from t h e Japanese
He s e r v e d t a c t i c a l l y Max
to
charge
of
law degrees
remaining
somewhat
back
in
McKenzie,
the
Bank and
(1980-1985)
called
export-activities
German g e n t l e m a n w i t h
in
managers
the
organization
important
appreciated
chairman
middle but
Japan
Wholesalers,
% of
small,
by a g e n u i n e b l e n d
was
Wella
% ugly multinational"
and J a p a n e s e p a t t e r n s
loyalty
25
identification
"100
Even
Japan, country. and
took
and 8 o v e r s e a s
particularly
members' salon
the
in
this
managers
all)
strangers,
president,
techniques
in
involved
atmosphere.
blue-eyed
Trade
top in
complete
was n o t
"butter-smell" Japanese
investing
insider-company
others.
employees
had
was
general
been
lacking admin-
Meanwhile and
The
profitable.
808
its
people
50
joined
the
organization;
universities, nineties. of
fields
result sales In
dropped
1983
the
former
to
separate
the
former
lined
into
As
flexible
a
in
companies,
to-door In
nearly sales
the
which
fired;
In
nearly
instead,
transferred this
to
in
another 100
in
2.7
but
as
a
of
5
had
been
the
stream-
a l s o became CEO. needs,
international
last
6 % in
5 years
1977 t o
efforts
strong
leap could
industry and
door-
27 % i n
1984.
paid
off.
forward
in
be
go,
let they
Both sales not
gradually
wholesalers. for
Wella
organization
r a p i d changes i n t h e Japanese 10
As a
serving
The w h o l e c o s m e t i c
employees
consolidation
changes
techniques
1981 merger
through amicable n e g o t i a t i o n s friendly
sense,
evolutionary
in.
a
however
marketing
from
sophisticated
who was
1976,
rationalization
resulted
profits;
rationalization
production
Company,
during
had s w o l l e n
meantime
strategies and
stagnant
the
e d u c a t i o n programs.
friend,
after
to
from
in
unpleasant.
Cosmetic
response
in the
body
1 9 8 1 as had been p l a n n e d ,
Max F a c t o r
p r o d u c t managers were c a l l e d had been
made
ultimate
one o r g a n i z a t i o n
freshmen
order-taking",
w h i c h was
Fine
100
management
and e x t e n s i v e
also stagnated,
president
were
facilities,
profits
them
the
"mobile
computerized, the
among form
efforts
with
warehouse
totally
will
Enormous
all
robot
who
in
industrial
Japan
always
accordance society
meant
with
in the
the last
years.
Looking t o
Wella
forthcoming
J a p a n now o p e r a t e s
rolling-forward perspectives account,
of
flexible 10
particularly
strategies
with
detailed
5 year plan.
years
periods
in staff
(1986-1995) annual
budgets
Beyond t h a t , are
and l a n d
always
and a
long-term
taken
acquisitions.
into
51
As
the
number
(together
one
with
in
market-segment
in
Consolidation, the
25
%;
tance
full
with
that
Kanebo)
from
Wella
also
furniture,
scissors, as t h e
hairdryers
and r e l a t e d
full
beauty
and
Japan's
number
the
goals
continuing extend
for
service,
these
in
retail
established
salon-business
to
salon-business,
and
specialized
three major o b j e c t i v e s 1)
the
Shiseido
outlets,
is
operates
and b l a d e s
14
of
service barber
the
company
% market
salon
as w e l l
for
e n a b l e d us In
regard
cooperation
that
as
in the world
This
close in
share impor-
for
i n Germany,
salon—field.
chairs,
two
building-up
factories
apparatuses.
in
are
years.
invaluable
leading manufacturer
as
price
there 10
further
present
well
high
the next
and
it
as
the
field
was
to to
with
already
established. 2)
As
for
the
necessity
to
care
famous
European
In
the
area
mass-market for
these
of
various
another
general outlets.
in
these
there
is
cosmetics Contracts
fields
and
the and with
coopera-
care
toilettries,
time.
with
Wella chain
The i n i t i a l
Japan stores
s u c c e s s so f a r
went last has
satisfying.
new
might
sales
coordination CEO
with the
Ultimately
into these
distribution
first
activities
former
together
drug-stores,
envisaged.
hair
fall
the
for
companies
into
All
ing.
of
and out
products
i n Japan a r e
been v e r y
the
branch
health tion 3)
pharmacies
has
again
companies, -
a
head
formed
lead
company a
to
the
culminating Japan
in
establishment ultimately
Japan.
in
Meanwhile
consulting
company
Ströher-Group.
Wella/Ströher
also
wants
to
boost
local
market-
52
3.
Successful
management
of
FAC
in
the
Japanese
consumer
market In
the
following
experiences
I
wish
to
give
and recommendations
involvement w i t h Japanese
3 . 1 Handling the
labor
a
condensed
summary
o u t o f my 17 y e a r s
in
situation
force
acquiring
and
success?
this
I n Japan
it
top-human
handling
people
especially
a truism
Two t h i n g s
Teamwork
is
execution young, end
unique
is
who
have
become
any
important
to
have
dynamic
and
account:
by
in
Japan?
groups,
discuss
Decision
quite
(USP), to
important
They
consensus.
managerial key
are
into
done
experts.
a
main
highly
employees
business
with
the
is
overwhelmingly
of
ringisho
it
a
positions
Japan.
a r e t o be t a k e n
rankless
up
is for
environment,
and
selling
true
that
capacities,
creative. 1)
is
countries
many
is
direct
challenge
resource-scarce
without
of
my
business.
I n s o p h i s t i c a t e d modern b u s i n e s s and t e c h n o l o g y especially
of
famous
often
the with
everything
papers even
and
like in
the
Western
countries. 2)
The
one d r i v i n g
projects, powerful founder has
a
force
though, person or
the
title
is in
because
delegate
a
Without
a
a
foreign
creative strong
philosophical
more the
push t o
often It
very
is
often
not
company man
charismatic
and i m a g i n a t i v e
or
in to
in
not
single
a
new
sometimes his
the
that
ideas
he
over
basis. Japan find
personality
level,
engage
important
he g e t s
on a n i n f o r m a l
dynamic
than
organization,
president.
to the organization Consequently,
behind the
must him
either
in
with
Japanese working
Japan. a
high groups
53
are
often
dull
and h e l p l e s s .
inspiration
t h e y go a l l
Very
retired
often
large
local
out
With the for
personnel
organizations
proper
motivation
and
ministries
and
achievement. (at
55)
provide
from
fine
characters
for
top
positions. Sources
for
the
companies,
average
Japanese
Japanese
overseas
labor
force
companies
in
expatriates
are:
other
financial
coming
foreign
trouble,
back
to
and
their
home
country. Stability
is
given
the
freshmen,
the
organization
to
the
scouted,
educated
over
a
dozen
n e c e s s a r y backbone o f t h e
3.2
The i n e v i t a b l e
It
is
wise
products
in
to
local
reputation
and
image.
the
They
long
built
up
later
build
are But
high
and l o g i s t i c
we
deem
a
by
within the
class,
profitable once
the
basis
unique
local
volumes
production
imported
and b u i l d
and
up a
good
involved
g r o w i n g and m a r k e t s n e e d t o b e s u p p l i e d r e g u l a r l y volumes,
run
company.
with
They
in
and m o r a l l y years.
production
begin
Japan.
organization
with
logistic
are large
base
as
inevitable. Generally,
Japanese
after
the
local
manufacturer
customary
third
The
high
quality high
level
complicated local
plant
and to
in
the
the
the
operating
foreign
situation"
consumer
standards
in
tiring
cannot a
but
prefers obtain
foreign
Japan, service
and p a c k a g i n g
regulations, in
who from
products,
trade
a the
affili-
products.
never
finish
domestic
like
stock
after-service
local
production
control,
of
and
quality
a t e d maker t u r n s
consumers
"out
Japan.
make This
the
excessive
organization,
of
a product
and
it
advisable
to
is
one
of
the
a the
have
safest
54
ways
to
truly
become
an
where
quick
deliveries
cause
severe
headaches
frequently In
unreliable
addition,
insider
and for
considerable
cost
the
import
Japanese
are
less
attitude
advantages
stems
from
with
Wella
very
feels
(importing north-east
than
-
has
developed
two
Besides t h a t ,
as s i t e s
Public
In
personal
at
(near for
field
of p u b l i c
always
relations
the
hate
monk,
proverb. Happy
t a i n i n g them w i t h
is
(after
their
and some
bad
ones.
presently
Kansai
in
Japan
erecting
Ibaragi,
and
consumer
production
-
and
centers,
necessary
a
70 km
country Japan
(Osaka)
two are
salaries consumers
own p r o d u c t i o n
in
prompt
be
an
has thus
conse-
and
logistic
(near
Sapporo)
and m i g h t
serve
4.
exact in
we saw a n e x c e l l e n t image w i t h t h a t also
hate
his
successful
Year's
party
for the
of
idea
the
a
general
public public
In
the
opportunity a true
Japanese his
deliveries
Japan.
clothes"
obtained with the aid of maintains
to
and
insider
food and p r e s e n t s ?
Suntory
artworks
I
Every New
of the p r o f i t
Similarly donates
its
and
to
international
a part
on
with
products,
comparisons
number 3 a n d
and
tried
"If
a
imported
and
Fukuoka)
combine our
conducts
lower
Japanese
w a r e h o u s e s on H o k k a i d o
affairs,
has
Japanese
relying
operate
to
If
o f Osaka
least
plants
can
relations
Wella
I
%) ,
industrial
centers.
3.3
about
(Tokyo)
deserving
on Kyushu
due
As a n e l l i p s e - s h a p e d
Kanto
quently
later
less
with
15
market,
goods
executive
usually
favorable
confident
of Tokyo).
focuses
and
-
70 km n o r t h - e a s t
two
foreign
i m p o r t e d goods v e r s u s d o m e s t i c
less
second p l a n t
less
Japanese
returned
efficiency.
enthusiastic
experiences
the
facilities.
factories
b u t more due t o t h e h i g h e r today
in
frequently
is
to
insider. an
old
wholesaler
clients,
enter-
i s t o pay these
back
clients.
museum,
Mitsubishi
and
department
big
55
stores
provide
a
lot
of
cultural
services
for
their
customers. As e a r l y
as 1970 W e l l a h e l d an e x h i b i t i o n
Pharaohs and t h e t r a v e l i n g the
Osaka
Expo p a v i l i o n s .
conducted spring
for
of
business
1984
the
partners
this
in
the
of
Ballet
Shibuya
many
a
lot
of
magazines,
of
have
Osaka and N a g o y a . danced
NHK-Hall.
to the Tuskuba-Exposition
in
a mirror
the
o f Madame Pompadour
symphony c o n c e r t s
i n Tokyo,
Stuttgart
in
resulted
appearances
Also,
many y e a r s
donated l o r r i e s
All
necessaire
been
In
for
in the
5,000
Naturally
we
1985.
'free
of
charge'
broadcasting
and
public
television
features. It
goes w i t h o u t
Japanese years,
PR
3.4
was
positive
personally
engineers compared court.
for red
legal
In
the
compromise
by
foe.
a
last
Hill
couple
and
in
of an
situation
governmental
and
has
language.
development.
fact
professional
environment
We h a v e
turn
always
made o u r
peace
conviction
that
tape. with few
Germany
the
Japanese
economic g r o w t h , judges
and
always
given
and
business
very
have
in
McGraw
and g o v e r n m e n t a l
this
agree
are
with we
Japanese
manager
with
a r e v e r y good f o r
There
customs
the
considered
with bureaucratic
not.
legal
speaking,
gratefully
I
relations)
educated
Living with the
very
we h a v e e m p l o y e d a
command o f h i g h c l a s s J a p a n e s e
Generally is
(public
who
excellent
saying t h a t
the
in
USA.
According
to
to
we
gladly
case
judge
lawyers
solicitors
tried
district
but
and
settle -
disputes
accepted much
the
disliked
are
Japan local out
of
proposed by
our
56
It -
is
a traditional
regardless
legal for
trial
5
or
against
of
10
years.
we
in
sensitive middle again and
and we
in
that
not
practices,
land
against
echelons and
Obstacles
of
support tive
on a last
discrimination
I
from
and
registration
importation
for
instance
always
top
serve
got
as the
Nevertheless,
all
local
what
rules
we
wanted,
delays.
office
have e x p e r i e n c e d
(particularly
of
c o m p a n i e s by
observed
from head
executive
(particularly
treatment
insist
the bureaucracy.
ultimately
and s u p p o r t
As a n e x p a t r i a t e
Japan
may e a s i l y
any
foreign
patiently,
though sometimes w i t h s i g n i f i c a n t
3.5
they
products,
acquiring
reacted
if
licensing
new
discrimination lower
-
observed
various
or
not
in
litigations.
marketing
have
or
also these t r i a l s
We h a v e
products,
intended
t o punish both p a r t i e s
guilty
parties
feel
procedures an
whether
i n the courts?
foreign
However,
practice
management)
from
the
both the
and
lower
warm
unapprecia-
ranks)
of
the
headquarters. I n my p r e s e n t office
position
staff
understand
their
p e o p l e on t h e In turn, their
I
h a v e made s u r e t h a t
involved roles
in
working
as
service-men
departments
and many
important into the
and o c c a s i o n a l
Japan their office.
of
our
and
head
markets
friends
of
the
o u r o v e r s e a s m a n a g e r s g i v e t h e m a warm r e c e p t i o n a Japanese
o f p r e s e n t s w i t h h i m when v i s i t i n g
laments
Japanese
all
overseas
front.
countries
particularly ces
for
flow
was
Naturally
also of that
achieved it
is
the
information,
than with his
it
overseas
is
easier
against
and to
not
the
to
at
a
It
central
Many a f o r e i g n
own p e o p l e
puzzling
brings
t h e head o f f i c e .
involve
entertainment.
however,
partners
success
to
colleague
seems
service conferen-
manager deal
home a n d with
in lot
the
Frankfurt
in
with that head head-
57
quarters, good
t h a t w h a t i s good f o r
for
Kanji
New Y o r k
Countries
must a l l
or
Tokyo.
(Japan,
Frankfurt
North
Korea,
China,
be c o n s i d e r e d as c u l t u r a l l y
their
own s o c i a l
Today
we
employ
Taiwan
necessarily EEC a n d
& Hong
different
Japanese
personnel
at
our
helpful
in
dealing
extremely
not the
and
the
Kong)
requiring
regulations.
regularly
Arabian)
is
America,
(and
also
Chinese
German h e a d q u a r t e r s , with
our
which
overseas
and
proves
staffs
and
clients.
3.6 Mastering d i s t r i b u t i o n Whereas
the
Japanese
we
still
sector, partly
-
(door
in
to
retail On
the
sales,
one
other
are yet
it
are
with
only
70
and
card
systems)
systems and
not
the
least systems are
a
minuscule
mission
company c a n e s t a b l i s h
sales
dealers
to
than are
It
130
barber let
secondary is
Germany
new
shops
and
of
a on
systems networks
In
the in
for
last
them d i s t r i b u t e
wholesalers; old
connections
chartings.
restricting
to
in
the
out
the
beauty
10
% of to and their
of
years
we
and
not
all
cases
accomplish relations
Nevertheless,
themselves
Japan-
are
directly 95
much more d i f f i c u l t
logic
in
160,000
countrywide
wholesalers
side.
districts; our
and b a r b e r
salesmen
appointed
succeeded.
more
in
Wella
the
hard
appoint
exclusive
44,000
by
for
struggled
we h a v e
certainly
beauty p a r l o r s
calls
We h a v e
our
at
modern
a r e c o n c e r n e d and no t r a d i t i o n a l
305,000
field merely
is
a foreign
question.
count
credit
wholesale
-
Most
t o change Japanese customs and p a t t e r n s ?
hand,
Direct
have
production
established.
compared USA.
in the
incompetency
sector.
extensive
tertiary
hand,
marketer
w h e r e new p r o d u c t s
There
enormous
distribution
to archaic
efficient
outlets.
foreign the
highly
observe
the
door
contrast
are
problems
2/3
of
designed
58
area.
In
salons their
we
take
a
force
of
via base
complain events
that
our
Germany,
and
business
most
typical
of
of
a
care
about
lack
of
products special
company
of
consultants,
-
our
thus
far 80
tion,
we must
store
foreseeable penetrate that of
future
because of
our
this
rest
have is
of
the
not
social
necessary at
Wella
pleasure
and
pharmacies/drug calls
employ
in
major
range,
moment. well
stores
s e c o n d a r y and t e r t i a r y
than
field.
as
hardly
will
a
served but
for
advising
mass
dozen
retail
penetrate
content
the
In
the
mama & p a p a
If
we
we h a v e t o t o l e r a t e a n army o f
approach
chain
wholesalers
chains.
wholesalers/peddlers
our
distribu-
t o t h e main dozen
appoint
by not
beauty
because of
high prices.
a dogmatic
do
thousand
outlets
a
on
field.
Again,
to
we
However,
we h a v e h a d t o b e
and s m a l l e r
we w i l l
is
treated
Now e n t e r i n g
connections
as
and
concentrating
country
also well
sales promotion.
segment one d a y ,
the distribution
and direct
of the salon
our r e l a t i v e l y
rather
do
and
Wella-affiliated
presently
should
dozen w h o l e s a l e r s
A pragmatic
combined major
making -
They a r e
establish
covering department stores
the
the
organizations
the
educated
the densely populated areas. products
product
for
about
are
(kouriten)
salesmen
stationed
restricted ladies
managers
of meetings,
bring
sons and
shops
rank
women
especially A flurry
their
attention
t h e customers and f o r with
who
knowledge
world.
for
40 w h o l e s a l e r s .
demand t h e A
the
Tokyo h e a d q u a r t e r s
made v a r i o u s
over the
ideal
and
Germany
employ 7 0 salesmen f o r hair
with
instructors,
our
conferences
have to
cosmetic
are
visit
enough.
Some
trips
companies a l l
because
contacts
and whose t e c h n i c a l
salesmen
and n a t i o n w i d e relations.
stores
direct
technical
frequently
on t h e m f r e q u e n t l y
human
The
80
of
upgraded.
wholesalers
call
care
i n our 8 s t u d i o s
regularly All
turn
possibly the
fact
hundreds
nationwide.
is
required
in
59 3.7 1)
Guidelines Market the
for
marketing
Research:
field
of
In
contacts
to
parties,
courses,
personal a
salon
the
we
shop
are
failure
owners
and
and a l s o
we
and
seminars
well
of
field
outlets,
lunch i n v i t a t i o n s
result
trade,
the
special
keep
staffs as
well
and v i s i t s
informed
partly
very by
arranging
as
extending
to night
about
the
o u r c o n c e p t s and t h e
in
close
bars.
needs
latest
As
of
the
trends
in
fashion. For
mass
marketing
we
H e r e we f i n d J a p a n e s e with
foreign
competence Japan
is
2)
Timing
companies
we
are
-
-
Elements:
consumers
Japan
in
Research follow 3)
product
is
consumer
in
not
all
the
information only
for
us
in but
the other
changing
and t h e h i g h
orientation are
marketing is
market.
is
used
but
speed
amazing. to
also
considered
quick on
as
the sales
Nippon.
I
or
have t o fashion
make
categories;
a
be a l w a y s
distinction
traditional
foreign
products,
on a l e r t
to
trends. here
Japanese and
of
three
products,
so-called
modern
products.
little foreign
field;
studies. affiliated
supply
any
quickly
Production
Concepts:
Traditional The
a
companies
and d e v e l o p m e n t
prestigious
have
only
side.
technological
Product
to
Nearly
their
Japanese
not
production service
market
and t h o s e
unfortunately
changing
Accordingly changes,
-
us!
One s o - c a l l e d boom f o l l o w s of
in-depth able
desiring.
available
a l s o about
make
institutes
if
Japanese
products
salability marketer he
outside
is well
desires
are
unique
Japan
or
advised not
market
in design the
Far
to
enter
participation
and
East. -
this for
60
instance
in
the
ties
to
cooperation.
We
create tional
food a
never
Japanese
variety
of
Prestigious small
profit
but
a
per
and a p p r e c i a t i o n
Modern
consumer
the
consumer
produced.
The
can
does
not
care
the
and
If
be
the
must
or
for
individuals
also
be
as
basically
whom t h e y
Japanese be
are
market
manufactured
genuinely
new
products
or t h e overseas head o f f i c e .
come
from
However,
whole
are
then
on
of
the
product
concepts.
manager"
to
countries
i s not yet
As a r e s u l t , serve
in
using
large
which
teams.
production
specialists,
themselves.
Japan
are
-
The
are
profile
accustomed
operating
in
to
"product
in
western
Japan. mainly
i d e a s and making them m a r k e t a b l e These
involve
engineers,
accounting
makers
requirements .
we
working
p r o d u c t managers d e l e g a t e d by W e l l a
implanting
appearance
a is
quality
considered
by
should
as
regulations.
t e a m s and n o t o n l y t h e p r o d u c t - m a n a g e r
members,
done
country.
ideas
the
a
establish
"modan" a n d
where
therefore
for
Turnover
help to
longer
they are c a l l e d
tradi-
suitable
i n Japan.
These
no
a
only
ideally
T h e y must f o l l o w m e t i c u l o u s l y
requirements inside
are
to of
brand.
they w i l l
prestige.
well form
name
consumer n e e d s and l e g a l goods
fashion products;
Wella
can be h i g h .
right,
and
local
are
do
some
launching
this
marketer
unit
are
reputation
adjusted to
products
foreign
will in
the
we b e l i e v e
foreign
for
he
of
under
concepts under a l o c a l
beginning
high
-
company
dreamed
product
reasons;
with local
industry
local
men,
More t h a n
despite
designed
in
sales
legal and
50 % o f
their
people,
experts, also
the
Wella
German
J a p a n and f o r
by
R & D logistic decision
products
in
international Japanese
market
61 4)
Communications: concepts for
Japanese
tions
are
We h a v e of
Similarly
also
are market
needs;
similarly
been v e r y
media
experts,
would
otherwise
product
concepts,
designed
foreign
highly
and
ideas
media
tailored
and
apprecia-
welcome.
influential
concepts,
local
to
particularly
leaving
however.
on t h e
the
style
execution
Countless
jeopardize
and
the
message
entirely
language
success
of
to
hazards
our
media
messages. Until in
recently
products; quite
the
doubtful
Going f o r TV
we r e l i e d
specialized
nearly
high
class
hair
dressing
outside
entirely
magazines trade
of trade
on
for
advertising
our
media
elitarian
support
t h e mass m a r k e t we must spend a g r e a t
advertising
and
later
for
is
papers.
campaigning
in
deal
big
on
daily
newspapers. 5)
Sales
Promotion:
refrain system
from
discount
according
sales
promotions
these
Japanese
posters, other
sales
enormous their
trade there
but
scale.
On t h e
In
is and
a
rebate
other
Wella
hand,
followed to
the many
evening-entertainment
for
also
engagement by
still
and
stickers,
disgusted
observe
excessively.
habits.
folders,
The h i g h m a r g i n s
light
levels, above
the
of
repair
all
trade. on
used
companies
is
addition presents, consumers. required
western
Here which
expatriates
an is and
families.
Services: the
turnover
are
personal
Japanese
practices,
retailers
particularly
6)
to
favors,
wholesalers,
Leading
the
i n J a p a n must be r e v i e w e d
merchandising services, notorious
A purchase contrary,
is
services,
free
returns
house
from a l l
not a d e f i n i t e
the
advice
relationship
on
deliveries,
legal
in all and
levels
of
act
Japan,
between
in
buyer
the and
62
seller
begins
enormous long is
lasting
4.
-
purchase: required;
personalized
applies
Japan
the
relationship,
entirely
this
with
after-service
even
in
of
curse
market
is
the
is
the
blessing
bad t i m e s .
among J a p a n e s e
a l s o t o W e l l a as an
cornerstone
the the
Business
partners
-
and
insider.
success
in
the
Western
Pacific We recommend g o i n g f i r s t Pacific
markets.
be
for
fit
Whoever
other
already
casts
Taiwan,
whereas
Australia The
are
be
met
in
Japan
by
Pacific needs the
long
of
Rim.
Usually lines
are
or
Rotterdam; t w o weeks
It
is
all
difficult
excellent
from d i s t a n t For
if
China,
Indonesia
which
or
have
case
must
a business
base
the
Indonesia.
from
Kobe
Western consumer Naturally
than
from
Japanese
through,
been
Asia
conquering
necessary,
after-
Frankfurt
these
reasons
for or
San
service-
on w e e k e n d s ,
European
w i t h German Wella
and
South-East
Asia
with
Indonesia,
the
Philippines,
Malaysia
managers
a
from
regional Japan;
Thailand,
and Hong Kong s a l e s
German h e a d q u a r t e r s ,
compete here
companies
concepts,
headquarter step
by
Taiwan,
W i t h o u t any s i g n i f i c a n t
know how,
to
provided
technicians.
started
in
have been e s t a b l i s h e d .
makers
repair-services
for
Korea,
Korea,
serve Japanese
shorter
straight
Japan
day.
extremely the
which
should
South-East
i n Taiwan or
much
work
this
market
nation.
in
for
Asia-
business
of
service
In
products
Francisco
with
and
mandatory
engineers 15 h o u r s a
Thailand,
enterprises
most m a r k e t a b l e
supply
on
resources
new m a r k e t e r . be
Nippon's
consumer
by t h e same
quality
to
in
the
natural
by J a p a n e s e every
In
shadow
the
sought a f t e r
seems
are
survives
entries.
a
standards
established
t o J a p a n when a p p r o a c h i n g t h e
and help
step
China,
factories from
and r e s o u r c e s
the
could
63 be
extended
Malaysia
from
is
the
base
Japanese
-
in
Japan.
for
Still
managerial
and a l s o t h e p r o d u c t i o n m a n a g e r i n P R C ' s
5.
Japan and t h e w o r l d
Long b e f o r e
Dr.
International lines:
a
presented
transnational
likewise
all
instances
global
book
"Triad
levels,
prominent
in
be
applied
Africa
area.
That
planned s t r a t e g i e s company
today
and t h e M i d d l e
cultural all to ing
its
from
be
certain
less
generally
it
means
mandatory share
German
development
in
Wella
along
must
his
be
well
East from
from
Europe
Japan.
marketing
categories
the
approach:
and
certain
triad-countries,
regions.
less
Local marketing population
international
and
be
in
must
either
local/regional
developed.
activities
its
dual
sophisticated
we must remember t h e
a major
a
product in
affiliated
achievements
make have
must
stronger
the
p r o d u c t s must be Above a l l
for
their
for
Power",
base L a t i n American markets might
there
marketing
consumer
in
Tientsin.
and S o u t h - E a s t A s i a p l u s t h e S o u t h P a c i f i c In
CEO
purposes-
t h e EEC and J a p a n .
From t h e N o r t h - A m e r i c a n cultivated,
excellent
had i n s t i n c t i v e l y
i n t h e USA,
the
markets
Ohmae's
true
today
training
l a r g e Japanese market
and
high
for
a
of
its
technological
globally
oriented
market-cake.
i n Japan,
presently
central
laboratories
order
to
profit
from
and
level,
its
which
organization
Wella
building for
is
increas-
up a
branch
research
Japanese
brains
& and
experiences.
We
would
find
the
idea
J a p a n e s e CEO n o t r e p o r t i n g at
the
head
office.
extremely directly
strange
to
t o a member o f
have the
the board
Management o f a J a p a n e s e E s t a b l i s h m e n t F e d e r a l R e p u b l i c o f Germany
in
the
-
A R e p o r t on E x p e r i e n c e s w i t h Problems and S o l u t i o n Seinosuke
There
are
feeling, (FRG)
many t h i n g s
or
Europe
strength way.
or
the
At
words
Buddha:
One r e s u l t s
"from
one's
do w i t h t h e
"grace
to
I
am
this
example
As I
understand
follows: one
is
must
it,
There
one
two
have
when
strength strength
the
something
One's
is of
only
of
from
it
of
of
for
has
to
everything
to
Buddhism;
thought. salvation
master
ability
or
others
greater
is
as
tasks,
readiness
to
or
also
to
leave
One must
work
with
the
all
who
are
nature.
a part.
many:
our
salvation.
other
comes
the grace
to
this
i n many c a s e s
and t h e
to
own
is
play.
kinds
it
by
Germany
one's
that
m e a n i n g one l e a v e s
struggles
to the providence
combined
are
expert
everything own
that
come i n t o
t h e meaning of
leave
done
own s t r e n g t h " ,
an
nevertheless to
forget
determined
Republic
believes
o n l y m e a n t t o be f o o d
As much as
relinguish;
never
salvation", not
which are
usually one
and d e s t i n y
of
Buddha.
is
least
however,
feelings,
life
In the Federal
everything
ideas.
We s h o u l d ,
heart, In
or
Kuraku
in daily
or also d e s t i n y .
Approaches
Management
by
involved. And t h i s
is
also the heading of
1 . Management b y a l l A Japanese
proverb
who a r e ids:
the
first
part
o f my
talk.
involved "Tv:ο
know
more
than
one".
As
I
66
b e g a n my j o b activities been
in
increased
involved
were
If
I
managers,
if
in
I
also
that
Since,
person
alone,
that
solve the
problem.
Gradually
this
I
all
one who
company,
decision-making
the
execution,
of
unusually
number
and
told
members
of
those
time
managers, me,
"I
do n o t
to
can
need
"My d a i l y
to
work
participate.
responsible
the
rather
work by
control,
then
and
not
sit
solving
and h a s become a h a b i t . process
is
for
several
involved
problem
My
All
feel
analysis
work
is
carried
out
by
people,
it
is
down t o g e t h e r
became
accepted
who p a r t i c i p a t e
more of
the
responsible
the
results
to
in in for
of
the
task.
2 · A smooth c o m m u n i c a t i o n
involved,
is
the people
type
So
con-
problem."
but
our
bottom,
annoyed
have
the
members.
departmental
my s t a f f
however,
the
order
the
those
etc.
members s a i d ,
expert.
In
average
of had
only
increased
no
the
necessary
staff
had
And t h e s t a f f
one
field all
not
that
the
particular
above
were
on my own,
should solve the
replied
-
competent
meetings,
superiors, it."
called
arose
inventory
our
and p e r s o n n e l
constantly
the
the
accounts,
demanding
superior
I
problems
if
after
h a d b e e n many goods r e t u r n e d ,
such
a solution so
later
tremendously
i n c e r t a i n departments,
called
take part is
there
sick
respectively find
when
outstanding
reporting
(and a l s o
accordingly),
meetings
siderably, long
FRG
together
departmental there
the
had been extended
to
be
flow
successful
in
a smooth c o m m u n i c a t i o n and
from
bottom
to
management
f l o w must e x i s t
top
within
system;
between
the
business
management
between
departmental
managers
and s t a f f
between t h e s t a f f
members
by
themselves.
an
and
all
from t o p
to
organization
staff
members,
those
members,
as w e l l
as
67
From t i m e been
in
to
company
the
Most
insight
several
firm
the
and w h i c h I
had n e v e r
My
is,
carry must
out
work even I
job
these
how
they
often
after they
had
For
example,
gross
profit,
and
loss
normally
as
that
well
figures
everyone
who
the
financial
confidentially occupation." is
expected
and
as
effectively
so t h a t
he
can c o n s i d e r
as
ask
myself
how
each
individual
duties
successfully
his/her
or
manage
h a v i n g any knowledge o f t h e s e
our
In
not
only
important
but rather
employees
it
enjoy
is
fundamental
that
also
our
member, field
department
for
w o r k and a r e
this
out,
we
hold
(Meckerstunden)
with
our
staff
of
without
figures.
employees
important
their
order
to
together
fields
of
find from
duties.
a
be a l t e r e d
or
In addition, w i t h our I
department
as
know
these
me t o know
satisfied
with
work f l o w s ,
so-called members.
well
On s u c h o c c a s i o n s
how t h e o r g a n i z a t i o n ,
When
can
that their
atmosphere.
meetings" come
possible
staff
can master h i s / h e r
work
to
how h e
i n m i d d l e management,
is
sales
better.
always
figures,
gain
inventory,
especially
It
our
previously
account,
treated
s e e n d u r i n g my e a r l i e r
have
chance t o
goal, are
they
compare
been
have t h e
figures.
however,
his
know
I
profit
which
members,
months,
which
sales
goods, etc.,
opinion
in
the
the
of
statement,
a s k new s t a f f
answer,"Here
into
development, handling
I
company
to
employed. an
time
the
I
as
from
receive
"griper Employees different
many t i p s
and w o r k c o n d i t i o n s
on
should
improved. we a l s o h a v e h e l d
"griper
l o n g - s t a n d i n g customers announced
for
this
idea
there
from our s a l e s manager:
"Mr.
Kuraku,
meetings"
many y e a r s was I
once a
year
now.
resistance
at
am d o i n g my b e s t ,
first but
68
you want I
asked
-
not
to
find
all
out where
important
only
staff
members
administration, accounting,
Then
as
the
customers diately of I
the
service,
pointed to
explained that not
good,
then
it
asked
that
everything
that
after
the
is
is
we
meantime during
kind
molecule
of
is
place our
but
the
and
sales
which
meeting
also
from
warehouse,
one
of
manager
sounded
like
not
the
sales
said
we and
our imme-
a
kind
our
our
fault,
meeting
be
office
a
customers'
system
is
not
but mine.
taken
down
discussion
I so on
held. heeded
many
meetings"
in
of
our
the
suggestions
reorganiztion,
our
service.
staff
member
molecule
damaged,
the
to
have
If
manager's
in
c o u l d be
"griper
t o hear our
ourselves.
returned
individual
a
problem,
justify
solutions
sales conditions, Each
a
took
we h a d come t o g e t h e r
to
area,
department,
outsiders?" this
me.
and
In
sales
at
advertisement.
meeting
out
from
participate
from t h e
and
views
received
to
counter-arguments,
self-defense
possible
make m i s t a k e s
shipping
first
sought
I
people
in
or
a
each
living
the
life
be
alert
of
the
individual being.
department
If
living
one
being
single can
be
endangered. Therefore
one
must
communication between a l l , on t i m e and b e Beyond
that
employees o f
and
whereby t h e
strive
for
improved
information
must come
reliable. I
the
have
constanly
important
plays within the entire
role
company.
sought
each s i n g l e
to
convince
area
of
our
activity
69
3·
Setting objectives
B e f o r e we t h i n k we must be
first
informed
be
realized.
a b o u t how t o
The
company
to
the
to the
is
principle
the
further
Matsushita,
who
fifty
ago.
In
years
addition
to
each
employees
to
activities I
also
give
welfare the
staff
I
set
of
old
the
year,
I
as
is
to our to
society,
and t o
devote
of world c u l t u r e . " founder,
today,
After
Konosuke
annually,
ask
objectives
is all
of
our
for
i n t h e coming y e a r , should
over
which I
an e x p l a n a t i o n
how t h e y
This
proclaimed
meeting.
name t h e
to
which
to
"Through
annual
and employees
suggestions
flow,
members
progress,
an o b j e c t i v e
at
every year.
the past
reads:
company
years
January
of the departments
our
promote
to
development
92
attend
in
want
that
is
this,
announced
we w a n t
philosophy
we
general
ourselves
improve t h e communication
what
The company must h a v e a g o a l
activities
contribute
execution
know a b o u t
about.
industrial
and
each
whereby
reach
their
goals. Listed
below
are
several
have been i n t h e p a s t 1982 o u r
motto
after firm 1984
it
read:
the
twentieth
as
1985 o u r
preparation 1986 a t
the
So j u s t
as
objectives
of
forward",
the
firm's
point
announce
our
because
founding
individual
of
our
of
goal
strengths
o u r new
i n c r e a s e d measures
for
four-
decentra-
necessary.
25
upon t h
the
to
the
origin"
anniversary eighties
" P a v i n g t h e way i n t o t h e I
our
necessary.
"Reflecting
our
turning
reads:
a step
"Contributing
and o f
read: of
-
anniversary
more harmony was
motto
what
because a t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f
divisons-system lization,
step
s t e p was
follows:
t o the team",
of
years: "Every
a reliable
read
examples
for
in
our
the
1987. objective
90s"
all
employees
in
January
70
every
year,
the
middle
management
in
every
employees
a
report
June
principle
of
"examination
of
country
that
they
must
also
have a g o a l which
In
Japan,
it
lives
know
in
this
a
go t h e
nation
country
material"
ability
35
raw
materials.
be
capital
the
future.
and
education
it
will
to
which
people
the by
and
everyone done.
with
our
us,
a
recognizable
in the
in
The
was a s m a l l
of t h i s
the
could
be
one
strives
to
realize
egg
of
order
"golden
prognosis
year
a little
that
Japanese
what
will 2025.
from
decline
the
of t h e i r
coming by
4 0%
Therefore
must show t h e n a t i o n t h e way i n t o t h e welfare
fact
future.
population the
the
Therefore
become t h e
must p r e v e n t
the people should s a c r i f i c e
That
aware o f
of
Republic
million
future
clearly
training
so t h a t
according
politicans
is
fully
in
can
The p e o p l e h a v e f a i t h
Federal
the
l o n g way t o g e t h e r
is
poor
ability
better
future".
true
entire
human
"raw
ever
to
so t h a t
the
involved.
the
that
called
The
all
to
remains y e t t o be
so
everyone
for
give
a s we h a v e o u r own company g o a l w h i c h we e x p l a i n t o
employees for
also
according
the present",
knows w h e r e we s t a n d a n d w h a t t h e r e Just
must
year,
the
future.
life
And
today
for
country.
digression.
Now once a g a i n t o
the
topic
at
hand.
4. I
How d o e s o n e d i s c o v e r a n d p r o m o t e h i d d e n often hear statements
people is
or
wrong.
good
Managerial
education
properly I
personnel
also
and
fulfill think
lazy". them
" I n t h e FRG t o d a y t h e But
personnel show
their
that
such a s ,
are
abilities?
I
believe
must g i v e how
they
the
can
this
young
judgement
young p e o p l e better
and
a
more
tasks.
this
is
not
sufficient.
The
managerial
71
p e r s o n n e l must a l s o h a v e t h e a b i l i t y abilities
of
each
certainly
not
very
say:
"Please
e v e n when
employee easy
is
promote
because
l e a v e me a l o n e
it
difficult,
to recognize
and
most
often
t o go my o l d
the
them.
hidden
That
the
is
employees
familiar
way."
management must a l s o m a s t e r
But this
task. Here
is
a n e x a m p l e o f how I
someone his
is
completely
best,
I
creativity
is
have
as
changes,
without
such
an
to
he sees i t
decisive
abilities
point
through
form
of
the
-
certain
a
I
any
transfer
principle
activities.
today
without
a while
the
from
a
if
gives
of
Through
completely
job this
different
and i n many c a s e s h e d o e s
his
before. is
a
that
before
After
of
work
Even
and
He d o e s h i s w o r k
day to
objectively, than
job through regular the
the
field
his
own w o r k
observed
according
sees
conviction:
his
is this:
improvements.
another
he
w o r k much b e t t e r The
and
any
employee,
rotation, angle,
My p o i n t
yesterday
alteration
with
frequently
lost.
exactly
came t o t h i s
occupied
to
further
form
of
develop
systematic
the
individual
development
on
the
j o b r o t a t i o n w i t h i n a company and n o t
normal
external
change
from
one
company
in to
another. Frequently money. is
it
That
aware
is
is
of
the
convinced
that
gives
his
I
all
would
like
said
that
certainly
people
not
significance
he
is
doing
here
totally a
of
his
explain
this
worked
on
more
work
but
for
if
for
closely
job,
then
the
job.
in
the
someone
occupation
meaningful
s t r e n g t h and p e r f o r m a n c e to
mainly
wrong,
and he
is also
the
following
at
different
example: Two
bricklayers
places. -
I
asked t h e
w h a t h e was d o i n g .
one
brick
on
top
first
the
same
bricklayer
street I
He a n s w e r e d r a t h e r of
another."
I
met -
he l o o k e d
annoyed:
also
asked
"I the
just
pale lay
second
72
bricklayer
-
explained client
h e l o o k e d h a p p y - w h a t he was d o i n g .
that
and
he
was
building
was
working
finished
quickly
so t h a t
It
without
saying
goes
finished
earlier.
difference
in the
as
hard
and
which
This
are
connection
it
t o make up
leeway.
I
is
always say,
of of
the
sea,
changes,
the
future
technologies
ever
progressing.
extremely
difficult
must
climber,
be
able
to
management
must
be
field
of
here
the
report
also
makes
in
it
a
and great
time
constantly
bring
If
one
misses
if
not
impossible-
due
to
his
predict
from
as
the
the
sudden
to
roar
many
years
weather
foresee
future
as w e l l
an e x p e r i e n c e
of
industrial
80s,
boom r e a c h e d
observing t h e development at
the
hi-fi
carefully
that
time
electronics
automats,
industry.
get time.
beautiful
and i n n o v a t i o n
beginning
ing
to
out
of
as
my
occupation:
70s,
Already
-
able
technology
Allow
In
more
trends
and
preferences.
me t o
was
difference
c h a n g e s i n consumer
management
could
his
a good f i s h e r m a n must be a b l e t o h e a r t h e
and
in
he
proudly for
c o u l d move i n on
house
small
a good m o u n t a i n
experience,
trends
as
He
house
end.
innovations
improvements
beautiful
the c l i e n t
5 · Management m u s t r e c o g n i z e Today's
a
At
know-how t o
as
the
we
the
same
had
boom
increased
time but
robots) this to
to
meant
us i t
and a t
emerged,
o f consumer
(such as b u i l d i n g
industrial
competitors,
video
a climax,
were
electronics.
the
supply
elements, our
we
the
process-
partners
supplying
m e a n t more
of in
industry industrial
cooperation. Simultaneously
we
extended
the
area
of
office
electronics
73 and
increased
The
end
of
started
sales
this
three
structure
of
of
semi-professional
development
years
ago I
electronics
and i n d u s t r i a l to
time
develop
with
o u r company.
that
50%.
other
appliances,
It
sales
besides
was
a
equipment.
three-year-plan
the
goal
ordered t h a t electronics
of
important
areas
including
to
the
which
changing
the share of
be r a i s e d
was
maintaining
video
the
office
f r o m 20%
finally
electric strength
at
further household
of
consumer
electronics. We w i l l This
definitely
is
not
increased
a
reach t h i s
planned
sales
g o a l by t h e
economy,
activity
in
it
is
areas
end o f
only
which
this
the
have
year.
result
a
of
promising
future. This
does
dealers.
not
only
Fifteen
apply
years
s h o u l d s e t up h i - f i room
for
mended
the
the
Those
followed
good b u s i n e s s
sell
I
dealers
and
of
our
and
garages.
radio
technology
with
portable
will
were
they
The pay
leave
telephones.
In
the
pocket
ago
where
to I
make
recom-
consumers
only
able
gained
to
achieve
a good
reputa-
specialist.
this
itself later
dealers
business gained
in
Technology
regarding mobile telephones w i l l in telephone
not
experience for
our they
cameras.
and t e l e v i s i o n
to
to
that
in order
years
studios
also
video
radio
not
ten
applies
dealers
stores
to
video
my a d v i c e
also the
and v i d e o
respectively
radios
it
told
in their
and p r o f i t s ,
recommend
car
us,
I
Eight
recorders
t i o n as a h i - f i Today
boom.
installation video
who
studios
hi-fi
could t e s t
to
ago
to
also the
to car
with
portable
the
future
business
and
sales
know-how
in return
allow
sales
systems.
90s t h e m a j o r i t y telephone,
of
which
the is
population w i l l the
size
calculators.
Then t h e r a d i o / t e l e v i s i o n
good s u c c e s s
in
sales.
of
have
its
own
today's
pocket
business w i l l
achieve
74
Another ces I
experience
in
colors.
remember
At
this
television yellow,
I the
end o f
with
pride
cabinets
or
technical
even look
out
on
the
hi-fi
1 9 6 0 s we w e r e
-
in
the
bringing
market;
military-green for
consumer3'
h a d was r e g a r d i n g
for
bright-colored
white,
portable
components
in
preferen-
successfulred,
curry-
radios
black
in
or
the
the mid-
seventies . This
is
not
also
for
knob
buttons, the
valid
technical
turning In
only
instead
consumer
preferences.
It
is
absolutely
and In
this
the
the
or
remote
station
that
management
the push
control.
in
digital
search
knob
which
is
change
foresees
together
but
of
with
search
innovations
development
form,
substitution
station
manual
or
television
sensors,
technical
necessary
follows
color
future
with
dealers
consumers. 1 9 6 1 as I
were of
and
the
of
as
on
automatic
of
example
cabinet
such
contact
radios,
another
trends
the
channels
buttons,
of
indicators
comfort
for
touch area
for
only
two
Western
founded
t o o k up my j o b h e r e
employees and were r e s p o n s i b l e
Europe.
in
first
were
seven DM.
in a l l
24 y e a r s ,
three
points
suited
for
my w o r k h a s m a i n l y (apart
t h e German
from
all was
in
all
How
the
hidden
and
the
DM. focused
developing
on
the
products
user):
2.
promotes
almost
one b i l l i o n
How one d e v e l o p s a new d i s t r i b u t i o n one
for
we
corporation
employees
1.
employees
Republic,
around 650 employees t h r o u g h o u t
last
specifically
marketing
350,000
y e a r we r e a c h e d s a l e s o f
the
following
we
sales of
T o d a y we h a v e a l l
During
When t h e
Hamburg,
reached annual
FRG; l a s t
in the Federal
method
abilities
of
individual
75
3. Ad
How one p r e p a r e s 1.
I
could
that
it
oneself
arrange
is
not
for
our
the
the
future.
relations
usual
with
the
supplier/buyer
h e r e o u r m o t t o was a n d i s :
dealers
so
relationship?
"Through p a r t n e r s h i p ,
mutual
success". Finally
I
could
important so-called at
a general
At
these
which
family
consisting
long-standing
Family"
and
comes t o g e t h e r
of
our
most
customers),
the
"Technics-Family" once a y e a r w i t h
us
meeting.
meetings
"family
other
a (the
"Panasonic
respectively,
our
form
customers
we i n t r o d u c e
members"
customers.
-
always
We a l s o
our
latest
a little
maintain the
novelties
earlier
to
than
to
open exchange
of
views. Ad 2 .
Here t h e a large
feeling
Therefore, I
is
created that
do n o t
at
the
only
previously
announce t h e
a l s o t h e number o f t h e i r Thereby but
I
do n o t
instead
the entire Ad
3.
Here
we a r e
all
members
of
Panasonic-family.
our
mentioned
number o f
s p o u s e s and
o n l y want t o
express
the
meetings
our employees
but
children.
appeal
obligation
annual
to
family
of
the
warmth,
company
to
family. motto
reads:
"Take
part
in
shaping
the
future" . The
background
behind
s u c c e s s i s no g u a r a n t e e everyone
to
work
this for
together
motto
the for
is
future. the
that
today's
Therefore
I
ask
of
the
food
for
possibilities
future . I
hope
thought.
that
my e x p e r i e n c e s
are
able
to
give
some
Process I n n o v a t i o n and S m a l l Firms i n Motonari
1.
Introduction
In
the
1980's
strong
Yamada
microelectronics
i m p a c t on o u r s o c i e t y .
c h a n g e i n t h e economy.
Japan
(ME)
It
technology
is giving rise
has
to a
Over t h e p a s t
years
been
firms.
kinds
of
Especially
ME m a c h i n e s
the
the machining center become
widely
factories operate
not
only
(FMS) . which
FMC
operations in
run
been
As a r e s u l t
or
is
flexible
the
FMC i s
the
a
process,
machines the
factory.
welding, also
have
and
to
system systems
system
applied
Initially
in
extended
been the
to
they
painting
assembly,
of
FMS
to
various
were
adopted
process.
Now,
inspection,
we a r e
now a b l e
to
control
aided
aided manufacturing design
(CAD)
and
process. In the
that
factory
manufacknown
Furthermore,
appeared
automation
discussed
of
The s y s t e m i s
(CAM).
system
preceding the manufacturing
a series
t h e automation of t h e design works. realized
also
flexible
production
has
been
but
so-called
small
have their
process.
computer
computer
(IR) Now
manufacturing
automatic
into
machine,
robot
firms.
the
t u r i n g p r o c e s s e s by one c o m p u t e r s y s t e m . as
(NC)
them s e p a r a t e l y ,
ME m a c h i n e s .
ME
processing,
the transfer
are
industrial
This
several
machines.
within
have
radical
introduced
controlled
manufacturing
to
(FMC)
FMS
some a few
addition,
they
and t h e
the
try
cell
and
link
and l i n k s In
by
them s y s t e m a t i c a l l y .
manufacturing
have
numerically (MC)
used
a
T h i s new t e c h n o l o g y h a s p r o d u c e d many
t y p e s o f machines w i t h microcomputers. many
had
in
It
last
the
design
facilitated few y e a r s (FA)
by l i n k i n g t h e CAD s y s t e m a n d CAM s y s t e m .
may To p u t
it be it
78
into
practice,
a
system i s b e i n g Also,
many
computer
kinds
of
into
facsimile,
word p r o c e s s o r
We
have
call
presently
ME
their for ride
works the
in
has
link
way.
these
of
their to
the
of
2.
in small
diffusion
of
and
aiding
their (OA).
diffuOA
is
network
in
the
small
firms.
problem
firms.
The
firms have
have
sought
small
to
firms
introduced
the
machines e f f e c t i v e l y ?
Can
systematically?
to consider the
influence
innovations
In short, of
potential
already how do
firms
computerize
enough
have But
to
we w i l l
ME m a c h i n e s
latest
field
on focus
in
our
small
study
of
the
production
data
theme
Japanese will
be
analyzed.
all,
comparison of According
to
manufacturing Enterprise
factory
we w i l l small "a
of
automation i n Japanese
show t h e
firms
survey
firms"
Agency
introduction indicates
machine,
automation
firms
technological
T h e s t a t u s quo o f
First
been
technological
an i n f o r m a t i o n
They
machines t o run
radical
shown a n d
build
ME r e v o l u t i o n .
p a p e r we w o u l d l i k e
manufacturing
price,
Large
In this
the
have
The copy
Recent
office
changes.
recent on
firms.
Do t h e y o p e r a t e t h e i r
plural
equipments
the
stimulated
What p e r c e n t a g e
ME m a c h i n e s ?
of
machines
and computer h e l p t o m e c h a n i z e
change
this
to
wave
(CIM)
inter-firms.
revolution
respond? they
reduced enlarged
and
adapting
manufacturing
business
operations.
this
being
both i n t r a The
offices
office
innovations sion.
the
new
introduced rationalize
integrated
proposed.
with large of
by
the the
is
shown
firms
Japan
for
the
in
the
firms.
1986),
machines
t h a t many l a r g e
on FA i n
production
conducted
(February ME
data
firms
technology Small
and
status
quo
in
have a l r e a d y
Figure
Medium of 1.
introduced
the It some
79 kinds
of
high.
For
ME
welding
machines,
example,
and
machines
and
the
painting
48.1%,
CAD
the
robots 43.1%,
w e l d i n g and p a i n t i n g
introduction
percentage
robots
of
58.0%, etc.
percentage
NC m a c h i n e s
is
automatic
In
inspection
particular,
the
and a u t o m a t i c t r a n s f e r
h a v e i n c r e a s e d by more t h a n t w o t i m e s
in the
is
59.2%,
last
CAD,
equipment three
year
period. These out
results into
confirm that
various the
some
large
During
the
(May 1 9 8 6 ) operated
Japan.
Management factories of
FMS i s These yet
On
in
products
process
known
to
in
factories
that what
machines. on FMS" are
tools,
Association
sample the
of last
which
in
C h i c a g o USA
FMS a r e
now b e i n g
the
diesel
etc.
Today
engine, 370
sets
229
shows
that
factories)
have
three
introduced
years.
88.5%
is
3.1%
the
large
of
introduced
But t h e
FMC
Japanese
percentage
and
that
of
4.8%. suggest
other
that
ME m a c h i n e s
in the t r i a l hand,
how
As
Figure
as
small
firms
most o f
systematically.
firms
have
not
Possibly
they
are
the
new
stage.
technologies?
far
not
can
process
world.
production
into
design
is
spread We
transfer
70 s e t s o f
machine
Consulting
figures
the
that
before.
the
the
it
has
J a p a n w h i c h was c o n d u c t e d by t h e
(total
operated
still
in
Conference
Their
in the
FA m a c h i n e s the
in
systematize these
was r e p o r t e d
survey
and
FA w h i c h
mentioned
However
transmisson,
FMS e x i s t
as
of
automation
"International
in
progress
operations
firms
it
automobile
the
of
manufacturing.
extent
Another
the
processes
advance
links
preceeds
of
support
1
do
shows,
has n o t
b u t t h e NC m a c h i n e a r e
small
the
firms
respond
introduction
increased
rapidly.
of
to
ME
machines
The r a t e
l e s s t h a n 20 %. H o w e v e r ,
of
because
all this
80
survey of
fails
to
clarify
sample f i r m s
in greater When t h e Gifu
the
we w i l l
number
of
answers
move on t o a n a l y z e
and t h e
other
type
information
detail. author
had a chance
Prefecture
in
1983,
to
survey
there
this
were
problem
many
in
the
interesting
findings. In
this
survey
e m p l o y e d more persons
by
and
electrical
robots
made
statistical
out
the
use
of
1986 o r
In
the
were
surveys
satisfied
with
less
(general
precision
mechatronic
Prefecture Almost
indus-
microcomand Osaka or
more
equipment.
Our
Prefecture to
300
metal
machinery,
equipments w i t h
would i n c r e a s e
to
centers,
mechatronic
which
than
and
introduced
same r e s u l t .
half
indicated
over
70% i n
that 1985
1987.
majority the
firms
belonged
machining
in the Gifu
introduction
also
in the Aichi the
small
machinery
had
production
surveys
a n d r e a c h 80% i n some
sample
machines,
estimation
of
and
industries
the
and o t h e r
pointed
had
(and o f
Japan)
transportation
NC
Some o t h e r
rate
course
persons in
of
meaning
Prefecture
the
10
machinery
59.5%
equipment,
firms
to
machinery,
machinery). trial
than
s a m p l e was l i m i t e d
definition
products
puters.
the
of
firms
introduction,
answered
and h a d h a d
that
they
effective
results. Yet
we
could
introduction operating What survey
is
and
rate the
find the
a
strong
growth
of
introduced
status
have
Prefecture
57.8% ME
quo
of
in
small
machines
not. the
correlation sales.
In
o f t h e s e m a c h i n e s was v e r y
Compared
rate
of
many
to
in
the
Aichi
Government Prefecture
production
our
experience
former in
this
the
firms
According
Prefectural
firms
into
between
the
low.
introduction?
i n v e s t i g a t e d by t h e A i c h i
December, 42.2%
not
precess result
case
is
to
a
last have while
in
Gifu
not
high.
81 The
sample
of
industries. Figure
2
gives
indicates third in
further
second
general is are
are
ceramic
wood
we
industries
in
both
earlier.
can
out
are
have
other
diffusion
Other
show
notable
and
low
plastic
percentages
furniture,
paper
wood
processes
ago.
and
products
Why h a s
processes
all
are
a
electrical in
the
rubber the
to
increase
ME
office
been
is
compared
appeared
and
(FA).
one h a s n o t
working
products
machine
and p r i n t i n g ,
automation
small
rate
estimated
connected
machinery,
a difference
lies
machinery This
had
in
among
machines.
among process
able
found to
in
three
industries? where
ME
introduced.
3 shows,
running
and
publishing
factory
ME
them.
we
product
which
Only
of
than
some i n d u s t r i e s
ME e a s i l y . and
In
of
transportation
plastic
the
applied
difference
make u s e
in
instead of
explanation
As F i g u r e
and
progress put
great
introduction
firms
introduced.
in
a
the
that
which
hand,
products
machines a r e
are
and
out
to
rapid
been
(OA)
implement
years The
(25.5%),
paper
the
suppose
robots
automation
metal
electrical
(71.5%),
products
machinery of
more
We
machines
to
and
etc.
point
90%
a
industrial
On t h e
machinery
average
high.
which
relation
precision
indicates
it
very
which
(86.9%),
Although the
industries
(31.2%),
approximately
take
precision
machinery
and p r i n t i n g
(69.3%)
the
is
industry
one.
etc.
Therefore In
is
(54.6%),
industries
manufacturing
d a t a one by
The
(72.9%).
high
and g l a s s
products
(33.3%),
percentage
publishing
and r u b b e r p r o d u c t s
all
information.
transportation
very
contrary,
includes
machinery
not
machinery
industries
On t h e
survey
we n e e d t o show t h e i r
highest
the
machinery rate
us
the
(92.9%), the
this
Therefore
them
83.9% o f in
the
the
percentages
are
firms
w h i c h h a v e ME m a c h i n e s
processing less than
process. 15%.
In
other
82
Therefore is
in observing
recognized
assembly.
Even
machinery, other
in
many
machinery glass
rate
and p r i n t i n g in
the
sand,
the
Actually
food
etc.
revolution
innovated
follows
in
is of
processes
ceramic
a
difference
materials
are
wood, is
occuring the
process.
with
various
used
paper,
Initially
cutting
and
publishing
(42.8%).
innovation
processes,
high
electrical
in
fiber,
innovation.
metal
in
still
plastic,
material
the
several
in
foodstuffs
many k i n d s
process
any
process
there
is
transportation
process
in
metal,
Presently with
and
process
special
process
of production:
simultaneously change
inspection
processing
advance
have a r e l a t i v e l y
assembly
%) and o t h e r s
among i n d u s t r i e s . as i n p u t s
the
the
little
o p e r a t e d ME i n
Processes t h a t
(33.3%),
(50.0
machinery
have not
are:
(43.7%),
products
one by o n e ,
machinery where t h e c o r e work
precision
firms
than processing.
introduction
Only
industries
in electrical
ME
Such paces
a of
diffusion. To
conclude,
MCs a r e cutting
3.
can
say
robots,
operating
Case
other
and
study -
metal
paint
the
metal
Painting
is
because
the
the
poisonous.
machines
and
industries
for
(CAD,
transfer
of
welding
equipment)
and
are
not
in
the
firms.
the
industry
industrial
or
consists
plastic machine
parts tools
robot
of of
etc.
small
firms
which
automobiles,
home
Most
of
them
are
firms.
t h e most d i s l i k e d w o r k .
with
NC m a c h i n e s
industry
products,
subcontracting
paint
ME
the
and m a c h i n e r y
automatic
introduction
painting
electric
although
i n small manufacturing
metal painting The
that
with the metal
processes,
painting yet
we
popular
spraygun,
paint
Different
the
includes
work an
When a p e r s o n s p r a y s is
dirty
organic
and
solvent
the
dangerous which
measures t o mechanize and a u t o m a t e
is this
83 work
have
been
taken
developed e a r l y several
types
typical
is
teaching
of
the
robots
playback
playback
the
ME m a c h i n e s .
is
the
usage
metal
Kanagawa samples
of
is
painting
the
We
can
per
equipments.
operated
often
find
the
most
most
by
the
painting
economical
relative
employee) .
price
(machine 2.
robots
has n o t
only is
A
year 5
robot's
in
investigated
in
survey
robots.
that
Though
they
the
become common
indicated
unknown,
The
yet
Here
among
l e s s t h a n 3 and sometimes as low as
industry.
has
far,
is
of
last
survey
so
were
Though
index
these
industry
developed
4 shows t h e
cost
painting
in
robots
firms.
Figure
Prefecture
painting
Painting
which
considered
labor
the playback robot
been
robot
system.
robot
annual
However,
long time.
have
in large
The
/
a
playback
playback robots
price
for
i n c o m p a r i s o n w i t h o t h e r ME m a c h i n e s .
have
the
the
metal
number
a total
share
of
total
Aichi
Industrial
of
of 2 01
machines
is
2.5%. For in
the
"Cooperative
Aichi
only
one
Society
Prefecture
on t h e
company
(company
association
consists
information
is
painting
not
firms
introduce
we must c o n s i d e r
3 . 1 The c o n t e n t s The m a n a g e r of
the
(1)
of
A)
hand, had
a
of
it
93
manufacturers. a
comprehensive
the playback
robot.
Although survey,
that The its most
robot. robot?
the conditions
Painting"
was r e p o r t e d
playback
on
To c l a r i f y
in using
the
them.
work
company A p o i n t e d
playback
following
other
do n o t h a v e t h e p l a y b a c k
Why do t h e y n o t reason,
of
based
of
robot.
out
The p l a y b a c k
some o f robot
is
the
advantages
suited
for
the
operations:
painting
many
times
little
by
little
to
make a
smooth
84 surface?
for
example,
plastic
parts
of
home
electric
products (2)
p r o d u c i n g t h e same p a r t s
(3)
painting the
not
parts,
only
the
periodically
outside
especially
the
but
concave
also or
the
inside
corner
of
them?
p l a y b a c k r o b o t h a s a n arm w h i c h c a n e x p a n d and quite (4)
with
products
in partial in
a
contract
freely big
saving (5)
of
which
require
charge of painting?
more
than
one r o b o t
two
is
persons
sufficient,
labor
operations
where
dust
and
dirt
deteriorate
the
quality? because city, It
is
desirable
robots robot,
rather
for
parts
for
than
generally
adhere t o
these
have
operations
by men.
But
Company
plastic
A
operates
parts,
the
to
small the
other
for
more t h a n 3 m o n t h s .
robot
in
only
operated
4
rate
3.2
robot
Even
The p r i c e if
the
firm
can be u s e d , The
price
million merely
of
the
yen,
5 or
has o p e r a t i o n s
t h e next problem i s
yen.
employees, for
of playback
kinds is
a
playback
This
sum
equivalent as
Figure
6 years
is
robot is
to 4
the
of
of
in
their
cases:
one be the
and
the
15%.
playback
robot
cost. is
over
because
it
labor
cost
of
leasing
cost
which
of
the
which w i l l
accessories
cost
by
use
products
investment
annual
t h e monthly
two
i n which t h e
The
not
As a r e s u l t ,
exorbitant,
shows.
which equals the s a l a r y
in
less than
with
not
undertaken do
parts
for
is
electri-
is present
robot
is
be
firms
produced r e p e a t e d l y
average monthly o p e r a t i n g
static
them
when o n l y one o f t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s
operation. is
plastic
d u s t and d i r t
3 00 o r
400
one s k i l l e d w o r k e r
2
10 is
or
3
runs
thousand in
Japan.
85
However,
one
introduced
alternative
machine can c o n t r o l to
the
sequence
imply
or
of
not
and
Therefore have
more
the
order
to
work
yen.
As
develop
to
equipment
the
easy
compete
performance
and
with
cheap
robot
and h a n d w o r k ,
in
the present.
it
for
introducing
the
progress
technology.
in
robot
Technological in the
capability
parts,
A
the
as
a
firms
is
2 sprayguns
or
3
is
it
is
4
this
important
chance
to
in
cost
and h i g h e r . of
most m a n a g e r s w i l l
of
the robot,
delicate
When i t
paints
required to
days skilled
reported
is
manufacturers the
But
in
operate
that
to
teach
the
the of
When
reciproprefer to
to
regard
make
rapid
order
needed
corner
adjust
the
of
robot
a first-class
most
difficult
takes charge of
several
firms
the
sprayed So
without
the
painter. work,
it
if
It a
it.
up
introducing
the
in teaching.
Challenging
the
i n t h e showroom t h e y r e a l i z e d
gave
for
of
o f t h e gun e x a c t l y .
engineer
the d i f f i c u l t y
is
inside to
technological
discussion.
knowhow the
the playback
and knowledge e q u i v a l e n t 2
r o b o t because of robot
immature
equipment
becomes a s u b j e c t
reported,
robot.
difficult
considerably It
would
automative
valuable
introduction
teaching
very
skills
several
which
manufacturers,
v o l u m e s a n d t h e s p e e d and d i s t a n c e
takes
equal
capability
of the
company
teaching
is
that
is
but
machine
by a c o m b i n a t i o n
equipment
Thirdly,
with
o f t h e e q u i p m e n t becomes h i g h e r
can be p e r f o r m e d
invest
As
have This
speaking,
robots,
robots,
painting
cative
3.3
strictly genuine
high-grade
reciprocative
million
endeavor
the
firms
sprayguns.
instead.
price 5
Several
with
An i m m a t u r e a u t o m a t e d m a c h i n e
robot. do
playback
robots The
firms
exists.
equipment
t h e s p r a y e d volumes and t h e b r e a d t h
t h e sprayguns r e p e a t . painting
still
reciprocative
t h e degree of
difficulty
86
involved. the
This
suggests t h a t
performance
method.
At the
of
need
absorbing
to
required
improve
it. for
and
the
in
small
introducing
it
must
receptivity
for
T h e y must h a v e a s t r o n g d e s i r e
Intensive
and
enthusiastic
are
of using the playback
robot
firms.
These a r e
and
t h e v o l u m e and i t e m s
preference
several the
improve
obstacles
it.
must
reciprocative
But
be
of
receiving
technological
and
from
to
alternatives,
w h i c h we c o u l d n o t make r e f e r e n c e .
believe
desire
to
factors switch
to
efforts
capability we
improve teaching
success.
cost to
the
capabilities.
technological
We h a v e d i s c u s s e d t h e c o n d i t i o n s orders,
simplify
firms
own t e c h n o l o g i c a l
new t e c h n o l o g y .
challenge
t h e r o b o t makers s h o u l d
robot
same t i m e t h e s m a l l
strengthen t h e i r They
the
there
removed
equipment
are
In
to
other
conclusion
in
order
the
to
playback
robot.
4.
Concluding
In this
remarks
p a p e r we e x a m i n e d t h e t r e n d o f
small
manufacturing
case
study.
We
Nevertheless several have
years
already
for
products introduced pace
small
been
been
the
could
into
of
progress
factors
which had e f f e c t s
firms
We
independently
apparently
to
the
in
data
related FA.
each
on t h e
As m e n t i o n e d
take
process
of
Today
they
processes.
or
case
to
each
have
process
examine
the
diffusion.
innovations
of whether
will
other
industry
one
in one
B u t ME m a c h i n e s
industries. and
and
matters.
It
processing
industries
they
the metal painting
small.
all
attain
into
presented
technological
I n t h e case of
firms
other
greatly.
recent
cover
automation
latest
f a c t s were found.
machinery
varies
The
not
diffused
and
factory
b a s e d on t h e
some i n t e r e s t i n g
metal Yet
firms,
are are
influencing
aware
industry,
before,
only
of
it
direct a
few
or
small not.
impact
is
playback
87
r o b o t s have been i n t r o d u c e d . invest
and
painting robot
machine
the the
providing more
the
plastics
entrants. the
robot the
or
company
synthetic must
is to
should
keen
better the
have
are to
up in
of
and parts
from m e t a l
response,
the
equipment.
industry
being
link
results
materials
new
compete
performance
changed
In
introduce compel
or
new their
to
firms
to
to old
the
improve
competition
with
resins.
appearing the
even s m a l l
ME r e v o l u t i o n . their
old
by
order
themselves
Moreover,
then
to
in
forced As t h e
to
metal In
this
innovate
its
equipment.
situation
firms
Some
orders
technologies
restricted all,
The firms
machines.
parent
new
for
makers. painting
efforts
robots
are
threatened
products
market
context,
the
making new
produce
manufacturing
After
are
develop
firms
indirectly.
are
to
firms
not
However t h e machines
new
painting
This
of
manufacturers
to
automated
which
type
they
and
challenged with
new
makers,
products with
use
firms
and
other
to
of
industries.
It
production
facilities.
cannot avoid being
We r e a l i z e
endeavor
survival
in
innovation
absorb
growth.
once
again
and t o
also
influenced
that
adapt
is
the
new
by
smallest
technology
88
Figure 1
The introduction of ME machines 3 8 W
_KO ι
small firms
CAD
largefirms 11.8
31.3
Κ5
9.8" "
8.023
small firms large firms
NC machine 16.0 1.2
small firms
Machining center (MC)
largefirms 25.9
11.1
smallfirms large firms
â9J
|;;j|;|;|||||||||||| 29.0
j 9.7
small firms
Assembly
large firms
robot 12.3 I 7.5
smallfirms largefirms
Welding and painting robot
12.3
10.5
5.04.5
«II 10.5
Automatic transfer equipment 5 f
7.9 ^
small firms
Automatic inspection machine
large firms 15.4 20
73 J
40
lllll
previous 3 year period
1:1111
recent 3 year period
60
—ι— 80
100 %
future 3 year period Source: Chushokigyo hakusho (Small and Medium Enterprise White Paper) 1986, p.213, ed. by the Small and Medium Enterprise Agency
89
Figure 2
The industries in which ME machines are introduced ]ü6.9
Foodstuffs
52.7 j
Textiles and apparel Furniture, wood and wood products
31.2
Paper and paper processed products
133.3 jij71.5
Publishing and printing
69.3
Plastic and rubber products
3 25.5
Ceramics andglass 58.7 lllllllll
Metal products 7 1
·9
General machinery
54.6
Electrical machinery
j
lll||l||||ll|||fllll||||||||||||||||||||||||||||œ.Q llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
I D 60.8 20
AO
—» 60
Transportation machinery
92
·9
Precision machinery others
I 80
1— 100%
90
Figure 3
Processes in which ME machines are introduced 183.9 ^ g
Processing Special process (welding, plating, etc.)
|l4.2
Assembly
U
Inspection 7.4
Transfer
7 9
Design and others
0
20
40
60
80
100 %
Figure 4
The reduction of the relative price of ME machines machine price/annual labor cost per employee)
Machining center NC grinding machine NC lathe Playback robot 1975 76
77
78
79
80
81
1982
F i f t h Generation -
Basic P r i n c i p l e s
and Economic I m p l i c a t i o n s
Roland
1.
Technology -
Fahrion
Introduction
Methods and t e c h n i q u e s verge
of
achieving
scientific
increased
research.
Intelligence that
is
would
of A r t i f i c i a l
"the
beginning of t h i s
science
be
Since
assigned
then
field
within
to
the
During
an
as
program
large
Japanese
Corp.,
etc.)
standards target
in
was t h a t
for
"project
this
assumption
sector
of
areas
of
science, output
and
century"
and
be
in
and the
in in
is
efforts
fifth
generation Information
a new r e s e a r c h
cooperation
of
Nippon
made
to
new
The
industry, for
new main
"intelligent"
The
motivation fundamen-
especially forces
or
fundamental
education.
eight
define
(1981)). and
and
Electric
b a s e d on t h e
nineties,
demand
1956.
substantial
(Japan
1990/91.
become t h e
life:
culture
the
by
John point
Anglo-American
Hitachi,
to
services,
will
on
architectures
the
The
systems.
(see JIPDEC
avalilable in
facilities
starting
the
JIPDEC
(Fujitsu, was
things
men".
Dartmouth
announced
industry
the
everyday
of
by
become a
in
which under
of
systems
in
the
Center)
that
goods
information
of has
conference
attempt
be
of
Artificial
machines done
Intelligence
new h a r d w a r e
systems
tal
in
i n computer
software
fields
most
stems from t h e work o f
science
companies the
the
(1966)
but the o f f i c i a l
1981,
Development
development
if
a r e on
i n J a p a n w h i c h h a s made l a r g e
international
systems
Processing
making
Conference
computer
as w e l l
in
Minsky
intelligence
in developing A r t i f i c i a l
computer
of
new d i s c i p l i n e
artificial
hemisphere
to
intelligence
v o n Neumann and A l a n T u r i n g , can
importance
According
require
Intelligence
in types
tool
in
the of all
administration
and
But
and
the
input
applications
of
fast
92
processing
business
understanding to
fulfill
these
capacities
In
following
the
Fifth
need o f
software
al
the control Nefiodow consist
made,
79).
of
various The
and
given,
the
generation and
new h a r d w a r e
information
be
The
first
which
have
and
society
the
on
are
flexibly.
milliseconds
generation,
which
transistors
and
to
others.
1964
generation in
to
the
used.
stored
times I).
years
amounts
IBM 1 4 0 1 ,
For of
in
the
the
1957
to
next 1964,
first
data,
time
and
the
Examples
for
RCA 3 0 0 ,
and
considered
the
integrated
circuits
of
lie In
the
the
10.
is
range
in
statements
Siemens 2 0 0 2 ,
where the
be
have
Neumann's
program
a c c e l e r a t e d by a f a c t o r
t h e s e computers a r e t h e
fixed
associated
von
Univac
0
1941,
by
is
of
can
thus
are
large
since
a to
(see
These machines
operating
704,
assigned
store
speed i s
and
The
(IBM
semiconductors
possible
processing
is
1957
principle
programs
to
units
controlled
and
generation.
data,
hints
from g e n e r a t i o n
developed
are
1951
function-
according
and o p e r a t i n g
computers
the
where
problem
and t h e
a few b r i e f
been
which
first
the
based
changed of
performance,
of
are as
times
of
the technological
introducing
us g i v e
between
architecture
is
is
computer g e n e r a t i o n s
relais
same
way
let
period
computer
it
targets
fifth
of the t a r g e t s
existing
I),
computers
range
and f i n a l l y , of
main
for
of
required.
(FGCS)
systems
order
new d i m e n s i o n s
the
Systems
developing
structure, Mark
programs.
can
of
speech in
FGCS-project
is of
(1984),
Z3,
tubes
survey
expert
the characterization
requirements
with
in
of
classification
(Zuse
and And,
out.
Main t a r g e t s
Before
a
implications
systems
pointed
requirements,
Computer
emphasized,
socio-economic
2.
sections
Generation is
images,
increase.
and o f p r o c e s s i n g speed a r e
knowledge-based
technology
moving
strongly
tremendous
storage the
graphics,
systems w i l l
beginning
microseconds
of
permit
(10~6
the
third
instruction
seconds).
Well-
93 known m a c h i n e s
of
Siemens
Since
4004.
Integration) base f o r tion
chips
1970
are
computers
to
with
computers
belong
308X,
3090,
IBM
and
requirements, technology
forced
by
voice,
computer
fundamental
scale
computer tions
of
and of
by
using
flexible will
will
the
structures problems another
any for
of
At t h i s
point
systems
which
with
Since
the
(IBM
will
4 3 00,
be t h e
the
number
of
and
fifth
orientation. information
be
become Instead
classical inferences
only
application
of
kind
of
parallel
of and
problem moved
by
requirement
specificabe
the
structures e.g.
decision
and
are
achieved
Furthermore,
processor
images,
per
production where
structure,
research,
of von new
requirements
structures.
the
the
short processing times w i l l processor
developed.
will
with
of
generation
of
must
software
basis
functional
performance
created
High
processors
to
logical
the
Automatic be
As
end-user
Second)
IBM
(Very
FGCS-capacities.
Per
and These
capability
and o u t p u t
language
1980 allow
(speech
VHSIC
the
seconds.
input
measuring
will
fixed
let
The
characteristics
operations
essential
communica-
seconds.
generation
within
natural
problem
price/performance
software
the
configurations
adapt
10~8
etc.).
characterize
Extremely parallel
fundamental
patterns
of
to a comfortable for
generations
necessary.
process
times
systems
generation.
program
to
10~12
Instructions
(LIPS)
the
and
Scale
Integration)
chip-technology
of
Neumann a r c h i t e c t u r e s , second
(Large
7700).
Scale
fourth
performance
(Mega
IBM 3 6 0
knowledge w i t h p a r a l l e l - w o r k i n g
speeds
features
images,
LSI
Siemens
computers
computer
are
the
represent
370,
7500,
Circuits)
Comfortable
MIPS
the
Siemens
expert
processing
New
and
generation
processing
so-called
Large
instruction
Speed I n t e g r a t e d fifth
(IBM
(Very
to
are
l a r g e d a t a b a s e s and t h e
recognize
pictures)
the
type
used which
computers
VLSI-technology
for
generation
the handling of
between
the
this
grid
trees
others.
for
Finally,
concerns an improvement
in
the
relationship. us c o n s i d e r
should
technology.
be
t h e most i m p o r t a n t
supported
Many
efforts
by
the
are
new
being
application hardware
and
made
the
in
94 automatic t r a n s l a t i o n a
combination
intelligence
documentation
techniques w i l l
development is
of
of
a
Within
10
words
query
and
and
1000
ments
speaker
first
approach.
speaker
data.
problem
Within
various for
allow
words,
New
efforts
base machines
for
the
fast
questions
and
in the
the
analysis of
b e t w e e n many be
made
field
and
answers
in
systems
must
storage
give
example,
the
and
the
develop-
of
in
image
retrieval systems on
a
of will
certain
level.
software
of
the
systems,
information
fifth
o f management, data
taken
capacities memory
approach,
and
of
will
achieved of
later
must
be
concerns
in
one
for
and i n t e r a c t i o n .
rules
in
possible.
Gigabyte
perhaps
(10
with
100
1
s e e H e n n i n g and M u n t e r
(1985),
225
2
s e e H e n n i n g and M u n t e r
(1985),
p.
Bytes) GB.2
pp. 228
An
in
and These
by k n o w l e d g e - b a s e d m a c h i n e s 12
a
techniques
recognition
be
for
simultaneous
access
the
will
a
all
Knowledge-
new t e c h n i q u e s
retrieval;
which
basic
fundamental
developed
r u l e s by e f f i c i e n t
inconsistent
capacity
project
comprise
knowledge
account,
can be and
processing,
different
into
elimination
procedures
systems
access
management o f
generation
i n which groups o f modules
processing
b a s e d management rapid
2000
1 000 words
will
the
dialogue,
A l s o new t y p e s o f p r o b l e m s o l v i n g
user
nucleus
areas
system
goal
for
aim,
than
The
techniques
planned.
systems
less
the
i n which
be a b l e t o d i s t i n g u i s h
data
systems
understand
are
for
interpreters .1
by
systems,
thousand
hundred) .
picture
recognition
with
response
(several
picture
rules
several
recognition w i l l
developing
The
A of
tuned
bidirectional
identification
typewriter
synthesis
persons
the
artificial
tool
level
systems
speech-understanding
a phonetic
and
be
Hereby,
system.
security
response
inference
of
of
and
and o f
fundamental
translation
still
interpreting
framework for
must
languages.
techniques
be t h e
multilingual
percent
new
analyzing
a
natural
1 0 0 , 0 0 0 w o r d s on a 90 p e r c e n t
remaining
is
systems f o r
a
with first
inference
95
system y i e l d s
the
and c o n s i s t s so-called GLIPS
meta
(Giga
inference Hence,
10
4
of
language,
and
between
and
5
10
an
the
images)
and
techniques conditions
when
this
a
formal
(in
for
speech
activating
attain
intelligent
dialogue
form
of
languages.
offer
of
or
system
terminology;
underlies
methods
gap
speech
Such
technological
signals
the
one
instructions.
context,
the
a
logical
i n order to bridge the
user
programming
of
with
One
generation
man-machine
functions
of
engine
1,000
fourth
functions,
algorithms,
second).
and
the In
need a v o c a b u l a r y
identification
inference
100
LIPS.
processing
per
intelligent
language the
an
from
conversational
between
of
and i n f e r e n c e
inferences
computers
for
a series
solving
requires
interfaces flexible
core
problem
logical
modern
between
the
of
real
pattern
time
recogni-
tion. The
development
on
logical
intended
of
process
programming
in
t h e one h a n d , = Read O n l y
Memory) the
machine
with
further
target
specific data
a
In
hand
logical
a
is
of
of
100
MB
RAM
10
GB medium
peripheral networks tions,
mass of
and
(RAM
first =
taken
into
data
of
a
especially
for
storage.
the
of
Access
Data
control
flow and
machine
numerical
for
important
part
of
the
JIPDEC
units
(ROM
will
for
machines
simulation
slow
with
the per
speedspeed func-
computations
of
intensity, as
a
special
system
numerical
A
capacities
fast
GB
operating
project,
with
transactions
100
be
relational
storage
Memory)
and
On
programming
various
103
problem s o l u t i o n s w i t h high computation an
with
machine
processor
approach,
Random
high-speed
language
data bases.
consideration.
base
sets
speed-memory,
storages,
(i.e.
logic
second s h o u l d be a c h i e v e d w i t h tremendous memory,
especially PROLOG
operations
parallel
parallel
processing the
relational
relational
architecture
are
using
programming
standard
GLIPS a
concentrates
b a s e d m a c h i n e w i t h ROM-modules
for
is
transaction bases.
logical
other
one
which
expressions
t o t h e concept of
a firmware
on
architectures
machines
logic
logic),
strong r e l a t i o n s
rapid
hardware
programming
to
developed,
new
do
scientific represent the
high-
96
level
man-machine
resolution require In
spite
of
of
dependent
the
has
large
enforced
as
of
been t r e a t e d have
because
processing is
In
started
step-by-step
procedures
and
algorithms
in
matrix
operations
In
the
algorithms
and
field
of
could
algorithmic
be
for
could
a non-existing
parallelization
Need o f
FGCS f o r
In
traditional
be p r e s c r i b e d their
precisely
sequential
followed
deviation program
in
from
an
the
statements
last
Artificial
ten
years
exact
manner an
considerable
Intelligence
to
of As
there
linear
equation
various
such
a
types
way
that
simultaneously. are
a problem all
sequence.
and
are
procedures.
shown
with
solution
must
systems
practice
prescriptive fails
new
structure.
by d e f i n i n g
processing
create
elementa-
algorithms
knowledge-based
programming
mathematics
for
be h a n d l e d
well-known
in
research in
the
theory
calculus,
solving
parallelized
steps
several
3.
matrix
of
to
algorithms
operations
and
algorithms
algorithmic
of p a r a l l e l - w o r k i n g
units
complexity
existing
of the
be a k i n d
parallelization
extensively,
all
not
essentially
There w i l l
been
such
should
capacities,
i.e.
a series
it
parallelization
it
complexity.
Unfortunately,
the
attaining
and c o m p u t e r
degree
efforts
algorithms,
separate
be
for
nature,
systems. of
efforts
an
which
performance.
parallel-working
coordination
trade-off
exists ry
with
algorithms,
high-
pixels
i n computer performance,
that
between
generally serial
immense
yielding
10,000
a n d memory
over-proportionally ,
or
parallel
systems
times
on t h e p r o b l e m c o m p l e x i t y .
trade-off control
flow
coordinating
grow
this
10,000
these
solutions,
expense
to
all
improvements
underestimated
problem will
of
a very high data
enormous be
communication
screens
algorithmic
The s o l u t i o n p a t h
and
path, error
in
the
the
the
case
processing
situation
efforts
develop
steps
have
concept
of
must of
of
occurs.
been
in
made
a the In in
so-called
k n o w l e d g e - b a s e d systems where t h e s o l u t i o n p a t h s must n o t
be
97
prescribed solving
explicitly,
process
a given query prior
inference
will
be
found.
from
the
pure
ships
seventies
the
data
systems,
is the
subject
and of
in
tools
to
system
a problem create
itself
problem
redefining as
given
problem
an
methods
and
for
building
and
uses
the
a
is
expert
expert
end u s e r
the
area
and
can
called
by
of
interviews
the
system. in
order is
able
of
building
The to
expert
find
show
For
and
system
answers
to
his
testing
An e x p e r t
giving
premises.
learning
high-level
comprised
for
a
changing
education
systems can p r o v i d e
e.g.
internal
of
systems
system
expert
is
changing
expert
and
expert
attaining
situation,
of
problem area
building
system
expert,
kind
professional
Since
the system's e x p e r t i s e .
facilities area
new
engineering.
revise
with
differs relation-
These systems a r e
of
information
solutions
training of
an
This
The k n o w l e d g e e n g i n e e r
while
can
problem
process
u s e d by t h e
possibly
sense many
t h e new
using
problem
early
area,
or
is
solution,
act
of
by
the
provide
system
components :
this
that
the
principle 3
of
that
created.
as a n e x p e r t .
expert
problem
such
have been g e n e r a t e d which
knowledge
interaction
of
in
fact
content
the
system and,
solution
engineering".
the
of
and p r e p a r e d
knowledge about a s p e c i f i c
expert
experts
be
the
systems
t h u s be c h a r a c t e r i z e d
different
a
by t h e
may
is
"knowledge program
expertise
knowledge
understood
storage
knowledge
high-quality
The
the
rules,
Knowledge data
between
discipline
but
t o be s t r u c t u r e d
can be r e c o g n i z e d by t h e
defined
processing
has
and
the
knowledge
financial
planning
management
techniques
define
structure
and
strate-
gies. Two e s s e n t i a l system: in
a
components
The a r e a k n o w l e d g e
knowledge
called
inference
and
scheduler.
a 3
base,
and
engine, The
s e e Waterman
the
an
represented
as f a c t s
an
inference
mechanism,
which
consists
scheduler
(1985),
of
is
p.
8
decides
of
an
when
expert
and the
rules so-
interpreter and
in
what
98 order
to
apply
determines with of
to
traditional
single
are
special
how
data
formulated
as
series
by
solutions
comparably
low
reasoning, repetitive
in
manipulating
In
data
use
sets
systems
equations.
Symbolic
structures
in
extent,
about
its
expert
an
chains
which
by
will
system
system w i l l
has
about
be a c h i e v e d ,
and
the
of
the of
end
in
itself,
for
loops
and
manner, realthem.
not
perform highly
or
use
nonlinear of
symbol
is
the
main
mechanism.
be the
To
a
able
to
and
exhibiting
desired
reason problem
i.e.
the
more
confidence
self-knowledge
t h e debugging of t h e assumptions
of
solving
symbols
will
a
from
Instead
equations
explaining
underlying
concept
will
inference
system
operations
at
manipulate
e.g.
relations
often
representing to
expert
and
of be
found
traditional
for
differential
such
form
rules the
form can
fundamentally
the
symbols
which
but
may b e
the
W i t h such a metaknowledge,
the
easier,
in
reasoning of
the
logical
computations,
shape o f an
own
inference solution. which
the
in
subjects
processing.
heuristic
of
principle
a
in
solving process,
complicated
is
sequence
heuristics
rules
problem
data
of
by
itself
bases
comparison
approximately,
given
sequences
mathematical
operating
only
interpreter
In
algorithmic
complex
Inference
and u s e
problem
certain
a
the
specific
distinguishes
large
systems
laborious
of
the
knowledge.
replaced
conventional
concepts
the
of
processing
iterations
is
Highly
expense.
and
facts,
area
heuristics
sufficient
expert
steps
conditions.
represented
world
the
processing,
processing
"if-then"
knowledge
apply
rule are
in
the
system made
is
more
explicit.
The
representation
on t h e nary
stage
query
of
relational an
expert
system.
A
knowledge
data rule
base system must
may w o r k be
which
the
w h i c h may b e r e p r e s e n t e d
first of
between
of
various facts
facts
within
of
a rule
and r u l e s . the
rules
is
obviously
Hence, as
understood
relationship tion
consists
facts
approach.
a
in
a
pure as
an
oriented prelimidata
"if-then"
body a n d a r u l e as a l o g i c a l
Creating
the
seems t o b e v e r y
base head,
combina-
relationships simple,
but
99
the
creation
difficult, between t h e The
of
search
for
of
search
strategies
all
the
principle
all
relevant
of of
a
fact
searching
the
are
the
is
goal predicate second not
Here a r u l e
all
matched.
put
this
be
PROLOG r u l e s 6
programming
of
can be
of
This
systems
backward whether
predicate The
forward
by
is
Colmerauer
programming
which
are
4
s e e Waterman
(1985),
p.
66
5
s e e Waterman
(1985),
p.
69
6
see e . g .
able
C l o c k s i n and M e l l i s h
the
search
is
verified.
principle
principle
be
whose
and
backward
used
in
realized
many in
which has been mentioned
developed
traditional
goal
analogously.
principle
situations. been
a
backtracking
decision-tree
from
as
matched
processing has
so-called
of
condition parts
Prolog
the
fails.
predicate
are
differs
goal
otherwise
each
if
of
desired
fulfilled,
treated
a
under
can
parts
the
facts
predicate
successful
is
with
I n t h e case t h a t
the search
of the
goal
condition
methodological
of
the
is
chaining
facts
matching
successful,
the
of
parts
The
of
the
a
First,
s e l e c t e d and c h e c k e d a s t o
condition
all
the
this
set
in
fundamental
matches
If
creates is
one
attribute
functors
and
the
be r e p e a t e d .
parts
can
two
determines
to
concerns
the
sequence.
before.
process
is
condition
If
4
c a n n o t be a t t a i n e d , principle
are
selected
inference
the described process w i l l
as
different
inferenced
If
or
extremely
dependencies
possible
inference
all
rule
been
all
There
an
chaining
Then
consideration.
chaining.
appears
different
conceived
nodes.
forward
selected
5
of
having
create
rules. has
the
may b e
as
to
predicate,
The
case
tree
facts
part
which
fails,
practice
the
solutions
decision
values
condition
in
in
rules.
high-complex
fact
rules
especially
(Marseille)
languages to
(1982)
make
the
above. in
and the
inferences.
100
With is
respect
the
to
best
traditional algorithm
general
problem
specification
developed
programming
programming
languages
must
be
prescribed,
today,
language. all
the
single
user
of
only
specify
A rule
is
calls
activated called
as
by t h e
a
sequence
Prolog
unification
matching of being
all
for.
data
or
file
data
Prolog
texts
which
may
programming
4.
types
of
of
the
fifth
their
systems rather area
not
require
firms,
the
implementation expected costs,
of
used
range for
to
military
Stakem
(1981)
the
than
to of
those
the
and at
it
all,
of
application of
employees.
systems, a
forecast
DM
60,000
implementation
Thus,
facilities. than
1990,
study to
DM
is and
of
from
million on As
the for
systems and
the
Diebold
200,000.
most to
and
subordinate 2.3
well-working
earlier
but of
number
no
is
software
administration,
own c o m p u t e r
applications ,
have
potential
FRG show t h e
7
with
who
implementation
on t h e
total 50
systems
automation
decision
of
public
in
expert
be
and
the
the
associated
For
hardware
figures
In the
according the
and
Some
less
to
priority
assigned
data
Prolog
conventional
human manpower
effects
9 % have t h e i r
be
7
the
industry,
% have
in
abolish
technologies
the
jobs.
modern
abilities are
in
may
highest
between
implications
oftenly
of
that
going to
What
only
lie
structure
between
in
so-
patters
h a n d l e d as
modules
rationalization
institutions?
97
average
are
and e s p e c i a l l y
is
loss
German i n d u s t r y .
average,
will
the
to
systems
in
as
general,
believe
communication role
and
jobs
experts.
education
in
generation,
to
are
expert
with the
are
the
the
distinguish
files
and s o c i o - e c o n o m i c
rationalization lost
All
conceived
computers
difficult
not
Prolog
techniques.
Technological
The u s e
structures does
in
the
which
permits
i.e.
t h u s no d i f f e r e n c e
exists.
be
Prolog
structures,
p r o b l e m d a t a and p r o c e d u r e s , types
procedure
interpreter.
of
available
searched
of
with
steps
must
what t h e system should perform w i t h P r o l o g . understood
Prolog
Whereas
The
probably
research
and
101
development. automatic in
Then
medicine
Expert
will
systems
automation
reason
for
tional
software
both
require
expensive
is
expert
that
expert
it
is
will could
very
every
stage over the
believed
that
the
same
the
as
seventies, standard forced
to
offer
an
operating compared
the
be
used
future
system with
Malthus sequence,
Due
increasing
to
early
more p o w e r f u l of
the of
new
IBM i s
observed
the
growth
poverty,
and
But not
production
this aware
that
he
therefore prophecy
ago
of
would
the be
t h e upcoming i n d u s t r i a l i z a t i o n
out
new t e c h n i q u e s
process.
a
in
to of
the
and new
may
be
Thomas
goods
recommended
developed
1985 about
a
when
nutrition
turned
was
computers
prophecied he
the
in
and
be and
IBM
and
and t h e g r o w t h o f p o p u l a t i o n as a observations
1981
been
situation
years of
in
presently
units
this
hundred
nearly
would
1983
personal
processor
Perhaps
computer in
have as
future
sixties
model AT,
same r e a s o n
two
these
was
should
as
over
marriage. he
XT
OS/2.
one
the
PC
point
efficiently.
For example:
But
powerful
the
development
1990.
family
with
more
in
most
traditional to
underestimated
development
and
comparison
forecast
years.
conven-
will
in
of development
been
The
efficient
changed
to
or
systems
negated.
systems
be
thirty
the
entire
linear
tural
be
model
the
For
Robert
because
to
announce
workstations
child
the
office
whether
Furthermore,
micro-computer
mainframe
up
AT03.
has
last
the
i.e. model
model
one.
in
not
difficult
technology
IBM
to
can
small
development because t h e r a p i d n e s s software
of
of
become more
systems.
systems
Nevertheless,
the
question
that
will
especially
structures
systems.
area
b e n o t e d a s much more " p r i c e - s e n s i t i v e "
communication
and
based
the
the
systems
develop between e x p e r t
assertion
cheaper;
the
in
diagnosis
knowledge
technology
development
systems
as
penetrate
Hence,
software an
control
as w e l l
probably
slowly.
such
essentially to
goods
competition w i l l
traditional
likely
modern
of
will
very
not a future and
the
production
as
a
geometric gradually the be
onewrong
agriculcourse
of
102
As
for
the
expert
market
systems
techniques, or
but
PROLOG
situation
are
expert
with
object-oriented
(which
is
favored
efficient
systems.
Then
qualified
knowledge
can
employees.
for
realized
The
programming
by
Japan)
services be
problem
lead
with
later The
can be r e t a i n e d
u s e d by s u c c e s s o r
most
tions
probable
will
be
technical defined
in
development
where
on
rule
the area
of
expert
special
or
precise
manner.
of public
conventional
According billion
ment
of
expert
optimistic assumption
handling.
methods
for
of user
The e m p l o y m e n t o f a
quick
of
to
a
the terms,
again into on o f f i c e
context
or in
in
will
mainly and
can
software 1990
the
the
have
a
in
the
man
we u r g e n t l y
systems w i l l on
mixed
changing
advantages, and
places
example,
customer's
more
developThis
fundamental much
larger
process
need
of
specific
and c o n c e p t s
of
become a p o w e r f u l market the
administration employment.
the
one w o r k i n g p r o c e s s .
of
conditions.
upcoming In
separated
credit-worthiness,
and t h e c o n t r o l
activities,
will of
be
application. to
problem d e s c r i p t i o n ,
expert
for
of
the
where
Little,
due
in can
systems
structures
invested
areas
we
organization
to
orders,
examining delivery
in
systems
for
profiles.
reaction
trend
customer
this
competition
taylorism
imply
and
implementa-
techniques
likely
behavior
a general
the analysis
for
In
be
all
most
future
the
problem
will
in
is
in
about
software
a s t u d y by A . D .
systems
that
knowledge
addition
to
dollars
forecast
specialists
Expert
by
1.25
will
storage
administration
p r o c e s s i n g obeys p r e d e f i n a b l e
than
of
applications
production
information packages.
qualified
system
be
realized
more
employees.
a relatively
not penetrate
to
companies
i n t h e knowledge base
concentrated
area
LIPS
highly-
less
within
many
as
require
d e c r e a s e b e c a u s e t h e k n o w l e d g e and e x p e r i e n c e who l e a v e
today
programming
methods
will
which
achieved
fluctuation
systems,
traditional
employment a r e
As f o r
taylorism w i l l
the
units
will
processing control
of of
integrated
long-term
d e c r e a s e by
In
reduction
processes
the
tool
effects
summarizing
103
various
activities
station. fusion
of
effects
imply
of
DIW
that
and
is
with
a
unemployment employees year in
2020.
increase of
72
In
the
labor
current
But
as
development
introduction
of
a
is
new
38
100
are
für
FRG)
in
1983:
computers handling
the 8
of
with
must
computer
experience see e . g .
main be
which
unemploy-
pensioners
higher
per
100
for
the
forecasted
alternatives
total
with
hours,
is
in
the
computeriza-
a polling involved are
detail was
of
and
the
of
Without
and
evaluating
the
that
computers
are
and
unemployment. because
substantially
made
GMD
Bonn,
i n t h e use
accepted.
cautiously
on j o b s
Henning and M u n t e r
and
partially
Datenverarbeitung,
rationalization
been
the
rationalization
of
und
an
increasing
labor
F o r most p e o p l e
is
employment
technologies
technologies
evaluated has
industry
show
first
result
effects
a
The
computers
catalogue
the
associated
pollings
judgement on
query
the
to
two
result
Mathematik
more
results,
strongly Such
the
economy
According
counter-effective,
correlated was
in
changes
only
The more a n e m p l o y e e i s
the the
polling
are
information
with non-acceptance. This
percent
contract.
of
rather
für the
one
second would be t h e
rise
are
makes
conversely,
had
strongly
(Gesellschaft
a
productivity
we
confronted
unemployment.
by
Wirtschaftsforschung,
per
tion
is
(Institut
FRG)
only
but
of
production
to
IAB
the
für
there
the
and
market
between i n c r e a s i n g
generation
hours,
information
productivity.
run
working stronger
labor
employment.
rate
1980
long
the
cyclical
productivity,
this
a
stations
Nürnberg,
Institut
In
work
imply
in
pensioners
with
in
new
and t h a t
low growth
rates.
and
keeping
on
changes
no c o r r e l a t i o n
increasing
branches
and
one
to
activities.
decrease
(Deutsches
there
at
trend
For example,
technical
i n employment,
a
areas
und B e r u f s f o r s c h u n g ,
report
ment
8
persons
be
computerization
a much h i g h e r
Berlin)
will
living
discussed c o n t r o v e r s e l y .
decrease
various
administration
Arbeitsmarktassertion
by
there
private
decentralizing The
done
Furthermore,
by
(1985),
a 332
single pp.
the
depends person
104
with
the
new
comparison Great
devices
with
Britain,
the
lowest
USA
and
the
in
the
Japan.
nologies
organization
countries
acceptance
In
of
the
U.S.
computer
the
rationalization
and
technologies. such
as
new
jobs
a
30
1985.
increase
in
were
or
technologies
is
introduction
of
new
of
industrial
all
percent
Especially
created.
employment
and
In a
the
in
areas
employment in
those
c o m p u t e r i z a t i o n was a n n o u n c e d t o g e n e r a t e h i g h many
In
France
not t o mention a comparison w i t h
created
1972
communication
European
FRG,
and t h e
between
and
other
Japan
strong
tech-
increase
jobs
where
unemployment,
we
see
increase
both, in
an
produc-
tivity. Are
future
have
a
world
-
which
perspectives
deep
and
which will
is
optimistic
rapid
necessary
cause
a
or
pessimistic?
technological from
deep
change
an economic
change
in
all
T o d a y we over
the
viewpoint,
society.
The
but main
arguments modern of
techniques
and
rationalization
versus
of
"performance information can
all
the
be
principle
a growing
human i s o l a t i o n
pressure"
by
of
if,
within
individual
The m u t u a l
a well-working
development
t h e adequate c h a n n e l i n g o f t h e changes
of
these technological
concerning
quality
modern
a
conditions of
more in
various
humane
self-realization.
interest
developments
production
democracy,
guaranteed
provide
working
control
is
too.
improvement
of
of
technology
invalidated
In conclusion,
and g r o w t h
employment
future,
higher
transparency
man
implication
better
loss
employment
modern c o m m u n i c a t i o n t e c h n i q u e s v e r s u s t h e of
the
labor
in a
in
groups society.
represent
an
environment,
industries,
and
a
105 References CLOCKSIN, W. F . / M E L L I S H , Verlag, HEHNING,
Berlin,
Entwicklungen. Berlin
(Japan
MINSKY,
Information
M.L.:
NEFIODOW,
of
L.A.:
P.:
Europas für
die
WATERMAN,
Processing
Fifth
D.A.:
Mathware-Verlag
Development
International
Center):
Conference
(October
Intelligence.
19-22,
Freeman
on
1981)
edition,
1966
Chancen neuen
-
im
Computer-Zeitalter.
Technologien.
Einführung
München
Kindler
Ein
Verlag
in
die
Programmierpraxi s.
1986
One S t e p F o r w a r d -
i n t h e US,
Grundlagen.
1984
PROLOG
Hanser V e r l a g , STAKEM, P · :
Trends.
Computer S y s t e m s
San F r a n c i s c o
GmbH, München SCHNUPP,
the
Artificial
Plädoyer
Springer
1981
Expertensysteme:
Anwendungen.
Generation
London,
H.:
New Y o r k
in Logic,
1985
Proceedings Fifth
Programming
Heidelberg,
R.-D./MONTER,
GmbH, JIPEDC
C.S·:
Space Program, Introduction
W e s l e y P u b l i s h i n g Company,
Three Steps Backup. BYTE to
(September
Expert
Reading
Computing
1981)
Systems. (Mass.)
1985
Addison-
The I n f l u e n c e
o f German B u s i n e s s
Administration
on Japanese Business A d m i n i s t r a t i o n Especially
i n Reference Takao
1. The
Introduction relation
in
Japan
of
Germany.
the of At
In
than
in
the
and in
it
not
this
in
also
is:
a
I
general I of
The
am
this
two
study
large and
science,
would
areas:
respectively sions
I a
accounting
be s c i e n t i f i c a l l y scientific
deal
of
their course But
German
in
inherent
in the nature
completely
in
divide
accounting
as
social
a
including
etc.,
(2)
both must of
areas
on
century.
into
system,
legal
provi-
accounting and s h o u l d
as
the
problems
correspond,
which
a
solely
T h i s d i v i s i o n may c o n t a i n
division since
accounting
is
some and of
accounting. is
a special
accounting
feature
should
of
have
our been
practice-oriented.
however,
viewpoint
this
Japan
last
the university
(successes)
nevertheless,
to
guidelines,
solutions
teaching
Since,
like
accounting
since
administration. administra-
researched.
dangers
in
course w i t h business
constitution at
subject.
engaged
accounting,
first
which i s taught
of
frame
with
influence
(1)
social
out
the
separate
mainly
J a p a n e s e a c c o u n t i n g s i n c e t h e end o f t h e
In
Republic
developed
business
primarily
accounting
but w i t h i n
completely
Nagoya,
paper
when n e c e s s a r y topic
is
of
and
Federal
accounting c e r t a i n l y
studies
University
My
administration
of business a d m i n i s t r a t i o n ,
accounting
tion.
methods
business
Japan,
Accounting
Saito
somewhat d i f f e r e n t
university
Therefore but
research
between
is
science the
-
to
I
provided
wish t o by
present
this
the
division
German i n f l u e n c e , can
even
be
the
advanta-
108
geous,
because
the
influence
affects
each
of
the
two
areas
differently. Proceeding
on
the
acceptable,
the
efforts
the
for
economic part,
first
principles shall
areas
them
be
into
stage
part
by
that
deals
harmonization
scientists'
relations two
assumption of
of
business
work
based
presented.
such
with
the
the
legal
the I
stage
German
is
struggles
and and
In
the
different
Finally
development
division
regulations
accounting. on
historical for
a
will
subdivide
periods
influence
second economic
and
the
examine
upon
Japanese
accounting.
2.
The i n f l u e n c e
on a c c o u n t i n g a s a s o c i a l
Accounting
as
accounting
which
gives
it
present to
to
or are
course,
the
is,
in
actual
customers,
shareholders
my
opinion,
value
business
circulation
so t h a t
on t h e
in this
On
the
and
one
can d e c i d e whether
shareholders.
interested
the
government
groups
are
in
hand
they
want
other
hand,
a c c o u n t due t o t h e i r
claims
For
competition
between commercial
lines, this
law and
generally part,
history
of
a
strong
very
present
the is
Japanese
this
to
has
a
strong
governmental
i n business
this
reason
legal
tax
is and
laws,
problems
and
not
be p r e s e n t e d , always
business long
dispute,
regarding
accounting
I
wish
to
In
is
relation
divide
guide-
between relation
back,
characterized to the
a
etc.
Looking
order
very
accounting
because t h e i r
similar.
dispute.
for
usually
accounting
the
in
revenues.
accounting there
provisions
laws,
interest tax
accepted accounting p r i n c i p l e s ,
economics w i l l
accounting
also
regard
interested
reasons.
principles:
to
up
become
accounting
different
In
system
business.
business Other
sums
and f u t u r e
creditors
Of
social
prospective
remain
on t h e
a
system
the by
more
clearly
last
hundred
109
years
since
periods,
the
essentially (1)
The
time
lasts
period
until
in
accounting In
the This
period
of
of
II.
WW
accounting even
apart
begin with
This
type
of
was
Japan's
" C h o a i no ho"
from
by Y .
already
an
unmistakable Japanese
in
law.
The
draft
this
such
legislation
was
the in
law.
that
Yoshikawa
that
to
to
when
Fukuzawa
deal of
the
(187 3 of
which
a for
account-
attention
origins
not
in
only
and
a
Japanese
German,
which
had
been
But,
due
to
had
been
Herman German trans-
the
fact
confronted
with
embarrassment several
of
government
first
was b a s e d on t h e
(1884) one
on t h a t
Meiji
the
appointed
general
9 years
left,
introduction
accounting
Japanese.
time
Japan,
German
The b i l l
time
into
first
approximately
right
countries.
promulgate
government
the of
of
1890,
attempt
law
in other
influence
came
the
Restora-
new a n d good way o f
received a great
the
"Daifuku-
a c c o u n t i n g method i n J a p a n ,
i n Germany b u t a l s o
K.
in
genuine
Meiji
so-called
T h i s t y p e o f a c c o u n t i n g has i t s
corporation
were
at
several
the
the
vertically
be a t o t a l l y
i n g and t h e r e f o r e
to
the
defeat
beginning
were
before
from
actually
European
seemed t o
commercial
epoch
accounting
with
there
methods
w h i c h was w r i t t e n
74) .
and
generally
this
principles
Although
cho",
undertook
were
independent
became of
business
ends
accounting
(1868),
Japan.
laws
number o f
half
over
period
tion
took
is
II.
end
by
three
era.
principles
second
controls
The
we w i l l
It
Showa
accepted.
Rössler,
following
commercial
business
Japanese
lated
Meiji
i n w h i c h an i n c r e a s i n g
us
the
as seen by s t a g e s ,
The p e r i o d
W o r l d War
the
which
the beginning of
strengthened.
The
into
T h i s p e r i o d e x t e n d s beyond t h e T a i s h o e r a
governmental
(3)
Restoration
important:
dominant.
(2)
Meiji
w h e r e b y t h e German i n f l u e n c e ,
prevailed.
revisions
before
110
t h e government passed
as
commercial been
first
rather
in
in
the
German
and
law,
must
disclose
year to
that,
law
back
which
annual the
accounting
that
several time,
difficult
but
considered the in
commercial
until
I
do
not
wish
for
tax
governmental
to
end
II,
which
was
carried
Shaup.
The
consider to
the
business
more
Reasons
of
the
greater
but
I
for
rather
will
yearly
system with
for
World
the tax
this
help
of
system can be
in
theory
the
balance
there Japan
was a before
in
1950, C.
S.
introduced
that
s h e e t as fiscal for
which
economy.
the
first
times
at
American,
in
law.
charac-
the
reform
an
was
seen
governmental
we do n o t y e t h a v e a n i n d e p e n d e n t
War, of
tax
of the tax balance to
was
about
taxes the
very
several
mention t h a t
until
a
on
(Rechen-
considered
improved
depth
own
this
be
accounting
Second
from
accountant)
the reconstruction
income
fundament but
has been
correctly out
modern
the
law
is
the
their of
to
the
balance
Apart
to
master
public
business
into
ordinance
War
thereafter.
go
purposes,
World
sheet.
which
of
t i m e a l a w was p a s s e d f o r
sheet
1927,
law
state
the
finally
followed
accounting
accounting (certified
teristic
of
established.
passed
this
end
were
C.P.A.
the
the
accounting o f f i c e s
was
then,
to
care
the
since
According
take
So
the
corporations,
one was o b l i g a t e d
forerunner Although
it
by
and
balance
meisterrecht) of
not but
Of c o u r s e t h i s
purposes
could
have
not
one
affair.
balance,
static
Since
at
the
Germany, call
law.
report
finally then
influenced
course a l l
included.
practical
practices.
in
strongly
French
business
as t h e
for
commercial o n e ' s own,
by
as
generally
was
inventory,
be u n d e r s t o o d businesses
We
was
Since
accounting
law,
and o f
and l o s s a c c o u n t a r e
accounting
At
Code.
The
further
law.
commercial
every businessman,
in
profit
law.
an
1899«the b i l l
corporation
Commercial
even
this
for
the
commercial
In
Japanese commercial
regulations
included
Meiji
is
acknowledged i t .
the
we do
not
belonging
policy,
business
and
taxes.
1 11
During
the
developed
second out
considerations, further
under
regard this
to
the
the
of
This
the
Trustees
The C o m m i t t e e within
As
a
sheet,
Finance
of
1930 the
valuation.
the and
für
In
more
call
order
at
in to
the
end
Rationalization Industry
DepartTrustees
Wirtschaftlichkeit).
Administration,
w h i c h was
first
widely
develop
several and
draft
sought known,
accounting
accounting
1934: for
These
interim
the
created
t o make and
the
then
for
guidelines
the
guidelines
draft
for
standard
depreciation,
were
not
yet
1934.
The
to
set
guideline
sought
and p u b l i s h e d
designed
to
rules,
which
accounting the the
companies
it
according direction military to
adhere
of and to
in
the
1937.
model
had
for
up
been
loss
and
a
This of
government
so-
combined
led
accounting
at
was
also cost
that
time
ministry.
obligated at
for
German
economics
guidelines
account,
guideline
developed
the
up
remained
cost
several
German
set
balance
guidelines
endeavors
the these
and
finalized
of
also
All
were
standard
the
to the accounting guidelines
committee
reports.
the
profit
for
these
Japan,
One may
t h e German B o a r d o f
of
under
year.
Code
instruction.
guidelines
called
the
the depression
trustees,
to
practically
Commercial
Commerce
of
accounting
tried
were
were
economic
the
created
the
of
guidelines
practical
guidelines.
(Reichskuratorium
result,
the
within
for
purpose
between
end o f
government
the board
significance practical
the
of
accounting
was a n i m i t a t i o n
Efficiency
this
at of
of
enterprises
control
weak economy d u r i n g
1920s,
Board
from
legal
period
accounting
necessity
although the
the
ment. for
the
accounting
era
stimulate of
period,
of
the
the
In
large
outbreak
of
WW I I . Despite developed time, the
military in
terms
which l e d t o
present.
control, of
accounting
technique
a state
that
to
a
as high
a
social degree
system at
this
c a n b e somewhat c o m p a r e d
to
112
The t h i r d time of
period,
which began a f t e r
accounting p r i n c i p l e s .
a c c o u n t i n g was c r u c i a l i.e.
the
balance
an e a r n i n g s
importance t o and
the
finally This
ciples"
in
after
large due
this
interim
the
was
set
to
managed t o were
and on t h e
earlier
binding the
law,
all
are
procedures, this,
one
rather
but
a
not
of
security
which trading.
for
This
models
caused. however, stabili-
the
govern-
a
There
of
the
important
are to
not
a
only,
just in
as the
accounting
concept
several
took place w i t h
elements
to,
various
social
various
is
guideline
adhere
The
countries
Buchführung)
are
promotion
principles
different
of
from
purposes.
T h i s model
standard
As shown a b o v e ,
Most
thus
accounting
voluntarily
from t h e ownership o f
principles.
from
destruc-
a n economy
of
working c a p i t a l
ing
reports the
of
was
(General
were,
practical
a collection
the
GHQ
situation over
Prin-
standard.
i n Japan
the
GHQ as p a r t
comprise
is
law
accounting
the accounting committee
"moral"
process.
task
about
handed
ordnungsmäßiger
only
they
certain
a
favor
foremost endeavors
the
business
report
experience.
should
(Grundsätze
They
requires
on t h e
in
"Accounting
reason
s e t up c o d i f i e d
Japanese
companies
G.o.B.
F.R.G.
but
based
the
between
of
was
Therefore
1 9 4 9 as a c c o u n t i n g g u i d e l i n e s
which
the
actual
up by t h e efforts,
and
difficult
report
required
and o u t m o d e d .
war,
century.
this
and t h e
the
was o f
compatibility
not
statements
intensive
office
For
U.S.A.
war
principles
of
first,
the
Japanese
against
year it
establishment
At
corporations
the
office After
the
These
a
an
financial
inadequate
of
of
decide
t h e w a r t h e most u r g e n t
of
to
end o f
the
economy.
stock
annual
zation
in
1949.
the
Headquarters)
ment.
the
with
c a n be named
t h e end o f
to
I n o t h e r words,
principles.
rather
Immediately
very
at
idea
solve t h e problem of
begins
but
rebuilding
tions
sheet
the
took over a quarter
principles
The
of
statement.
accounting
period
the
in the time a f t e r
generalization
internal of
WW I I ,
The m o d e r n i z a t i o n
which
reasons
for
democratization
the
separation
of
capital. essential
mention
are
for the
accountGerman
11 3
corporate stone
law
of
and
the
principles
consist
principles
of
the balance added
to
1:
and
part
truth, of
sheet. years
and
profit
believe contents
The
of
principles
the This
tendency
think
that
German
Part
an
possibly
basically sheet
sheet
principles: separation caution,
added
later).
and
law,
and
accepted
German
loss
as
it
rendering the
directly stems
G.o.B.,
accounting
is
of
also
due t o which
of
the
the
because
U.S.A.,
but
I
of
the
translated
and
then.
of the balance
s h e e t a r e b a s e d on
conception
show
and
the
valuation
time,
attempt
principles
competed
and t h e r e f o r e
was
made
to
it
attain
took
with
the
commercial
such a l o n g
compatibility
time of
the
concepts.
I n t h e m e a n t i m e a compromise b e t w e e n t h e t w o
has
accomplished.
been
in
accounts.
influence
was
are
sheet.
obvious
accounts,
rendering
from
conception,
the
Japan.
this,
from
I
uniformity
although
generally by t h e
2
the at
price.
accounting that
was
The
profit
i n t o Japan back
balance
purchase
at
is
it
omitted
3 : The p r i n c i p l e s
dynamic
The
is
balance
introduced
eight
part
than those of the balance
o f t h e two b u s i n e s s
inventory
for
continuity,
influenced
understand
were
unfortunately
valid
continuity
altered.
of
of
principles,
latter
r e c o g n i z e d by us i n
certainly
the order
following
(the
were
2)
principles
were
equally
transparency,
somewhat
principles,
3)
rectification.
accounting
c o n s i d e r e d more s i g n i f i c a n t One c a n
but
are
the
corner-
accounting
accounting guidelines
transparency,
principles
generally 2:
general
f r o m t h e German a c c o u n t i n g
are
accounting
for
principles
importance
truth,
1)
the
summary,
accounting,
i n the next
capital,
come i n d i r e c t l y
Part
later
accepted
and
that
loss
formed
In
principles,
consist
from
uniformity,
they
three parts:
Procedures
The g e n e r a l 3
Together principles.
and
basic
generally
as i s
of
profit
these
removed f i v e Part
G.ο.Β.
accounting
But
considering
the
law until two sides
circumstances,
114 several
professors
are
accounting p r i n c i p l e s
3.
The i n f l u e n c e
Here
we w o u l d
always
are
like
like
authors
to
to
select
the
principles
into
Japanese
Ueno a t
the
Ρ = K) on
of
University
of
Schär's
theory:
sheet over
the best A
few
theory.
After
I
important
the
publication
translated
introduced
to
Ρ +
all
and
the
1920s,
by
R.
Professor
M.
Schär's
efforts
Κ.
Ueno
of
Japan
in
Schär's theory
had s t u d i e d
with
under
i n t r o d u c e d many o f
theory specifi-
considered
one
of
topic.
stronger in
the
Kunimatsu.
which he w r o t e
even
up
sheet
Gerstner's
r e a d b o o k s on t h i s was
the
tackled
t o J a p a n by Y .
originated
in
time.
t h e P.
sheets,
most
picked
connection
was a l s o g e n e r a l l y
which
my m e n t o r
also
many
books,
made e n t r y
balance
law a t t h a t
account-
equation
Ueno w r o t e and
and i t
static
introduced
first, he
it his
sheet theory,
purpose,
1930,
not
"mathematical"
His
was
Tokyo
on b a l a n c e
influence than
until
Schär's. ed., In
His
and most w i d e l y
lasting 1928
a
of
point,
i d e a s were s i m u l t a n e o u s l y
A =
almost
book
are
this
the
1925.
of t h e commercial
this
second
F.
5th
Due
theory.
was a u t h o r i t a t i v e , for
only
with
Schär's theory,
Regarding the balance
cally
of
teaching
schools
they
at
i n Japan.
topic.
taught
Kunimatsu's
theory,
and s o u g h t t o s p r e a d
Nicklisch's
formulation
for
by t h e c a p i t a l
H.
prevailed
German Since
Therefore,
J.
in
practice. balance
influence
started
Bilanz",
universities with
distorted.
(which i s c h a r a c t e r i z e d this
actual
science
opinions
influence
Hayashi
books
the
e x p o u n d upon t h e m .
und
A -
that
and s t u d e n t s .
practice.
"Buchhaltung
ing theory
what
significant
for
initial
accounting
show
scholars
and b r i e f l y
A strong
opinion
h a v e become somewhat
mainly
relevant
would
the
on a c c o u n t i n g as a
h a s h a d on J a p a n e s e thought
of
E.
and
longer
Schmalenbach's
Schmalenbach
Schmalenbach's
from works
115
in
the
But
form
at
of
first
articles
one
had
in trade
b a c h ' s t h e o r y due t o t h e divorce
oneself
from
commercial
law
The
framework
entire
bach' s
was
addition Iwata,
into
from
Bilanz",
publications continued.
Toki
interpreted to
his
new not
students
efforts, neither
in
in
many
general,
with
correctly
i n Japan.
only
researched
In
are:
I.
Kurosawa. all
1931,
but
also
Despite
nor
grasped
system o f a
der
dynamithe
intensively Toki's
the
of
it
great
theory
as a s o c i a l
a c c o u n t s was
means
work
he e x p l a i n e d
understood as
"Die
translations
moreover,
articles.
II
works
his
Schmalenbach's
exceptions,
WW
sheet
of
"Grundlagen
few
during
Most
balance
1935,
a
Only t h e uniform
Schär.
1931.
static
translated,
in
in
K.
of
to
Toki
Toki7 s
Schmalenbach's t h e o r y ;
of
mentioning
Preispolitik", editions
theory
Schmalen-
by
the
the
difficult
sheet of
translate
With
it
Schmalen-
framework
worth
Kontenrahmen", und
1938/39. of
Japan
Toki
translations.
theory
Yamashita,
let
"Der
Selbstkostenrechnung sche
balance
more t o w a r d s
Schmalenbach
Japanese:
one f o u n d
names
Y.
and
understanding
accounting
into
other
lean
that
static
the
Nakanishi,
though,
in
the theoretical
of
Toki,
T.
theory.
fact
the
introduced
to
authors,
and
journals
difficulty
was
system
officially
controlling
the
economy. As
accounting
noticed
for
principles that
principles the
first
pursued that
after
the
idea
the of
was b a s e d on S c h m a l e n b a c h ' s d y n a m i c t h e o r y .
works.
meritorious Kobe
In
place
this in
University eightieth
bestowed
especially stood tation
in
of
those
Japan;
the
other on
one
all
Since famous
Schmalenbach has g a i n e d a accounting.
their
For
honorary
this
very
reason,
doctorate
of
upon S c h m a l e n b a c h on t h e o c c a s i o n
birthday.
member
Unfortunately,
way,
Japanese
business a d m i n i s t r a t i o n honorary
war,
accounting
t i m e h i s t h e o r y h a s made i t s way i n t o a l m o s t
Japanese
his
were time
Toki,
in
turn,
Schmalenbach outstanding
cost
Society
works
accounting,
t h e y were p u b l i s h e d
to the accounting p r i n c i p l e s
was
in
are
by
selected of
as
time.
Schmalenbach,
still
1962
that
of
as a
i n an a t t e m p t
not
under-
supplemento
improve
116 cost
accounting guidelines.
examine
Schmalenbach's
One h a s
namely
American
recognized,
management
t o accomplish t h a t . administration of
the
In
history
addition as
following Heinen,
K.
as
short,
other,
4.
the
spread
I
simply
lately,
(1)
law
belong quickly
in
American
German there
were
to
the
Mellerowicz, famous
for
E.
us
in
Hilke.
examine
American
or
legal
the
German
theory
two
this
ways
takes
that
on
the
This
type
the
influences
has
the
wide-
undoubtably
the
comes of
the
commer-
and d u r i n g
influence
practice.
help
to More
influence
the
example,
before of
from
become
is undeniable.
with For
guidelines
affects
This
place
institutions.
category.
German
continues
influence.
accounting
and d i r e c t l y
the
accounting
accounting
are
Influence
and
Walb
two.
illuminated
fundamental
said,
government
have
Although
have a g r e a t about:
also
remarks
now
sides.
to
authors
applies
K.
Japan
the
other
and E.
this
Hax,
in
and
viewpoint
attempts
times
B r i n k and W.
students hand,
also
especially
H. J .
business
the
administration.
Japanese) K.
Kern;
zum Toki
Tageswertbilanz",
years,
Kosiol,
Schmidt,
one
are
earlier
into
o r choose between t h e
Up u n t i l
cial
There
of
very
assisted
from
of business
recent
W.
university
on
Concluding
two
E.
Riebel,
Nagoya a r e R . - B . In
In
are
Wirtschaft I
to
again.
introduction
Schmalenbach's
examined
in
once
ideas
freien
organische
Yamashita
authors: P.
theory
ideas.
well.
"Der
been
("Die
the his
1960 as w e l l ;
Schmalenbach,
by
of
that
from t h a t ,
has
theories
Schmidt
known
in
one h a s b e g u n
accounting
light
believe.
Apart
of
other
to
F.
translated well
I
theory
systemize his
such
in
was t r a n s l a t e d
years
on c o s t
accounting,
management-oriented, Gedächtnis"
In recent
ideas
takes
WW
II
place
117
(2)
The
second
students
themselves, slowly This for
way
study
is
slower
German
and i n t r o d u c e
takes
roots
requires example
a
in
the
it
the
great
in
and more
theory
deal
of
to
business
as
whose
in
as
the
information may
I
sought.
countries
a r e t o be found
scientists.
Allow
world
me t o
it
lags
appear-
the
dynamic
Japanese
Japan have within
These
and
business
our
to
problems
can
be
deal
with
special
field
have
traced
their
back
to
in the practice
as w e l l
as
with
name b u t
catchwords
only
balance
accounting,
of
where
framework.
strongly.
we i n
problems
be
case
accounting,
above, of
must
various
reasons t h a t such
types
solution
origin the
implied
time
by
Schmalenbach.
a c c o u n t i n g has c o n t i n u e d t o d e v e l o p
different
ideas
academia,
and
shown
Japanese
of
theoretical
time,
previously
Thanks
Currently,
system
into Japan's
s h e e t c o n c e p t i o n by E .
many
burdensome.
a
Japanese
balance
German
or
sheet,
current
cost
a
few
accounting accounting,
guidelines, etc.
This
suffice.
believe
attempt
the
time
to create
has
o u r own
come
in
which
accounting.
we
Japanese
should
D e v e l o p m e n t o f E x t e r n a l A c c o u n t i n g i n t h e FRG A c c o r d i n g t o t h e 4 t h a n d 7 t h EC -
Wolfgang
1.
-
Hilke
Introduction
This and
Directives
T h e New German A c c o u n t i n g a n d R e p o r t i n g L a v
contribution reporting
law
will
give
a
survey
of
t h e German P a r l i a m e n t
i n December
of
the
German p r o v i s i o n s in particular
new
4th,
7th
implement
accounting adopted
by
1985.
The new German a c c o u n t i n g a n d r e p o r t i n g regulations
the
("Bilanzirichtlinien-Gesetz" )
and 8 t h
law i n c o r p o r a t e s
EC D i r e c t i v e s .
amendments
to
The
39 e x i s t i n g
the new
laws,
to
t h e commercial
law,
the
stock corporation
law,
the
limited
company
liability
the cooperative the p u b l i c i t y the
associations
law, law,
law,
ordinance
for
the
public
accounting
profes-
sion. The
following
the
applicability
the
new
schedule of
accounting
wick/Mitchell,
p.
9).
(see t a b l e the and
1)
shows t h e
EC D i r e c t i v e s reporting
contents
adopted law
(see
as
part
and of
Peat/Mar-
120
Table
1:
C o n t e n t s and A p p l i c a b i l i t y
o f t h e EC
Directives P a s s e d by t h e Council of the EC
4th Directive: Accounting directive
Stock corporations, joint s t o c k companies, private limited l i a b i l i t y companies
1978
7th Directive: Group D i r e c t i v e on accounting group f i n a n c i a l statements
Group companies
1983
8th Directive: D i r e c t i v e of p u b l i c accountants
Admission c r i t e r i a for ind i v i d u a l s who are authorized t o perform obligatory audits of annual f i n a n c i a l statements of corporate entities
Stock corporations, joint s t o c k companies, private limited l i a b i l i t y companies
1984
The
of
provisions
transmitted was
the
limit set
Presentation, valuation, a u d i t and publication requirements for annual financial statements
for
for
into
case the
could within
avoid a
31,
law
in
of
the
to
years 1986,
Directive 1980,
p.
vear p.
have
been
earlier
than
6-7) .
however,
simultaneously
reorganize 7-9).
should
The
time
7 t h a n d 8 t h EC D i r e c t i v e s
fundamentally (see
five
1986,
I n Germany,
incorporated
having
Küting/Weber,
EC
1987.
companies
few
4th
Küting/Weber,
adoption
were
1 9 8 5 so t h a t
German
(see
December
Directives
the
affected their
at
these the
end
b y t h e new
accounting
Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
was
three of law
twice p.
9;
121
2.
C o n c e p t o f t h e new l a w
The
most
third All
pertinent
essential
provisions
now i n c o r p o r a t e d 23). -
changes
were
affected
book t o t h e German c o m m e r c i a l
into
In particular,
previously
limited
into
accounting
commercial
adding
a
new
law
and
reporting
are
(see
Coenenberg,
t h e a c c o u n t i n g and r e p o r t i n g
included
liability
mitted
for
by
law.
in
stock
company
commercial
corporation
law
law
-
have
(see
8-
regulations
law
now
p.
been
and
private
also
trans-
Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
p.
11). The
new
third
central
law
Germany,
book
for
with
regulations nearly
as
specific
the
first
a
p.
"lex
also
prepare
5).
(§§
law
associations.
companies.
changed
today are
is
not
also
to
and
degree
well.
One
of i.e.
the
KG
(see
those
group
topics for
liable p.
need t o
on to
com-
book
of
concerning
and
corporations, liability
applicable
1986,
this
how
accounting
partnerships
the
covers -
to
(partnerships)
main
Küting/Weber,
4 t h EC D i r e c t i v e ,
of
new t h i r d
regulations
those
the (see
only?
limited
companies
of
8)
i.e.
stock
regulations
in
provisions
the
private
new s t r o n g e r to
the
p e r s o n as t h e p e r s o n a l l y
the
p.
regulations
substance
private
applicable
GmbH & Co.
preamble
the
lower
the
have a n a t u r a l the
in
and
as
that
264-289)
all
statements of
the
covering
corporations
specific
companies
To a
(§§
§§ 2 9 0 - 3 1 5 )
law concern c o r p o r a t i o n s .
stock
proprietorships been
to
as
enterprises
(Coenenberg,
336-339)
covers
changes
reporting
238-263)
business
financial
part
cooperative
joint
(in
serves
regulations
("Konzernrechnugnslegung") ,
The l a s t
main
now
The s e c o n d p a r t
commercial
The
law
reporting (§§
all
applicable
consolidated
panies.
part to
includes
accounting
and
specialis"
regulations
second p a r t group
commercial
applicable
Göllert/Ringling, -
of
accounting
of
sole have
criticism
corporations w h i c h do partner, 34).
not i.e.
"In
the
harmonize
the
122
publication justified
rules by
enumerated
in
shareholders, net
assets.
annual
annual
fact
the
that
the
trade-off
against
(Peat/Marwick/Mitchell, ( a s done f o r
the a
first
falling
under
this
rates
of
Essential the
27).
time
corporation;
highest
3.
the
legal
changes
in
transformation
in
This
is
of
why
the
on t h e German
reason are
the
for
the
as
a
European government
to treat being
their
liability"
t h e GmbH &
that
those w i t h
companies one o f
the
Germany.
a c c o u n t i n g and r e p o r t i n g , of
their
considered
limitation
category
insolvency
form
to
requirements be
i n May 1 9 8 6 ) the
was
legal
security
to
a p p l y heavy pressure
Co.
KG l i k e
p.
are
the
o n l y b y means o f
publication
statements
statements
in
provide
and o u t s i d e r s
Therefore,
Community w i l l
financial
companies
Directive
creditors
financial
necessary
for
the
4 t h EC D i r e c t i v e
caused
into
by
German
law 3 . 1 New s i z e
criteria
In
the
§
2 67
divided table
into
corporate
entities
new German c o m m e r c i a l
small,
medium-sized
and
law
corporations
large
entities
are (see
2).
Table 2:
Size
of
for
Size c r i t e r i a
category
for
corporate
Balance sheet t o t a l DM m i l
Small
below or equal
3,9
Medium-sized
above
3,9 to
Large
above
15,5
entities
Sales DM m i l 8
15,5
8 to
Number o f employees 50
32 32
51 t o 2 50
250
123
Two
of
these
three
succeeding balance (whose
shares
terms
of
sheet dates.
are
dealt
on
are
a l w a y s deemed t o b e l a r g e
In
the
furture
corporation company, various
3.2
is
it
will
ranked
as
because
small
requirements
stock
very
small,
in the
for
must
be
quoted
met
on
two
corporations
exchange),
however,
corporations.
and
simplifications
Eased
the
be a
size
Publicly
important
whether
medium-sized,
medium-sized
a
or
large
companies
enjoy
regualtions.
corporate
entities,
depending
on
size The
following
requirements of the
for
company.
schedule corporate
(see
table
entities,
3)
shows
depending
the on t h e
eased size
124
Table 3:
Summary o f e a s e d r e q u i r e m e n t s d e p e n d i n g on s i z e
for
corporate
entities,
Large
Medium-sized
Small
Due d a t e f o r t h e preparation of annual f i n a n c i a l statements
3 months
3 months
6 months i n course of normal b u s i ness, o t h e r wise 3 months ( i . e . i n case of liquidation, etc. )
Presentation of balance sheet
Full presentation
Full presentation
Presentation of those captions assigned l e t t e r s or Roman numbers suffices
Presentation statement of earnings
Full presentation
Statement can start with gross p r o f i t
Statement can s t a r t w i t h gross profit
Disclosures in notes t o financial statements
Full disclosure
Various simplifications
Various simplifications
Valuation
No simplifications
No simplifications
No simplifications
Audit requirements
Obligatory audit
Obligatory audit
No ry
Publication after balance sheet date
9 months
9 months
12 months
of
rules
( c o n t i n u e d on t h e
following
page)
obligatoaudit
125 (Table
3
continued) Publication i n the Feder a l Gazette (publication of the e n t i r e financial statements i n cluding notes to financial statements and r e p o r t on e c o n o m i c development and p o s i t i o n , in the Federal Gazette)
Scope o f publication
Source:
3.3 The
presentation
earnings
must
depending
on
on of
presentation the
follow the
size
n e e d e d t o be
4b)
follows,
in
stock corporations, be r e g a r d e d , the
several of
for
expansion of
sheet
new
the
and
formats
company,
the balance
general, several
in particular
expenses
balance
in
statement which
the
of
differ,
degreee
of
presented.
A l t h o u g h t h e new f o r m a t and
Restricted trade register publication (fil i n g of balance sheet, abbreviated notes to f i nancial statements, a n d comment on a p p r o p r i a t i o n of i n come w i t h the trade register? note in the F e d e r a l Gazette that t h e documents have been f i l e d with the trade register)
P e a t , M a r w i c k , M i t c h e l l & Co. ( H r s g . ) " E x e c u t i v e O v e r v i e w New German A c c o u n t i n g and R e p o r t i n g L e g i s l a t i o n " , München 1 9 8 6 , p . 3 1
New r e g u l a t i o n s
detail
Full trade register publication (filing) of basic financial statements , r e p o r t on e c o n o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t and p o s i t i o n , and comment on appropriation o f income w i t h the trade register? note in the Federal Gazette that t h e documents have been f i l e d with the trade r e g i s t e r . The b a l a n c e be f i l e d i n an a b b r e v i a t e d format. )
incurred the
that
sheet
presently
(see t a b l e s prescribed
changes i n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n according in
for must
to
connection with
business,
4a
the
set-up
or
126
the
intangible
patents, other the
etc.
equity,
(see Coenenberg,
licenses, and
trade
good
marks,
will
on
the
p.
which
must
now
be
divided
reserve,
reserve
35):
reserve,
earnings
reserves
treasury
(grouped
stock,
earnings
reserves),
retained
earnings
from t h e p r i o r income /
Furthermore,
fixed
accumulated
requirement
Table 4a:
as
hand,
capital,
capital
net
(such one
hand),
into
and
the
shareholders'
share
for
assets on
of
/
into
statutory
legal
reserves
accumulated d e f i c i t
year,
and
loss of
the
assets
and
brought
other forward
year.
must
depreciation,
simply presenting
be as
shown w i t h opposed
n e t book
original
to
the
values.
P r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e Balance Sheet - Assets (Assets and 1 l a b i l i t i e s / s h a r e h o l d e r s * e q u i t y p r e s e n t e d s i d e by s i d e )
M e d i u m - s i z e d and l a r g e c o r p o r a t i o n s ( f u l l presentation to the extent applicable)
e
page)
to
be
Small Corporations (only captions i d e n t i f i e d by l e t t e r s and Roman numbers)
ASSETS U n p a i d C a p i t a l , t h e r e o f c a l l e d up Expenses i n c u r r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e s t a r t - u p or expansion of the business A· F i x e d A s s e t s I . I n t a n g i b l e Assets 1 . L i c e n s e s , t r a d e marks and p a t e n t s , e t c . as w e l l as l i c e n c e s t o such r i g h t s and assets 2. Goodwill 3 . A d v a n c e s p a i d on i n t a n g i b l e a s s e t s
( c o n t i n u e d on
cost
present
χ χ χ χ
127
(Table
4a
continued)
II·
B.
Tangible Assets 1 . L a n d , r i g h t s s i m i l a r t o l a n d , and b u i l d i n g s , i n c l u d i n g b u i l d i n g s on p r o p e r t y owned by others 2 . T e c h n i c a l e q u i p m e n t and m a c h i n e r y 3 . O t h e r e q u i p m e n t , o f f i c e f u r n i t u r e and equipment 4 . A d v a n c e s p a i d on f i x e d a s s e t s , and a s s e t s under c o n s t r u c t i o n I I I · F i n a n c i a l Assets 1. Shares i n group companies 2 . Loans t o g r o u p c o m p a n i e s 3 . P a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t e r e s t s o f 2 5 % o r more 4 . Loans t o e n t i t i e s w i t h w h i c h t h e e n t e r p r i s e i s l i n k e d by v i r t u e o f p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t e r e s t s o f 25 % o r more 5. Other investments - long term 6. Other loans Current Assets I · Inventories 1 . Raw m a t e r i a l s and s u p p l i e s 2 . Work i n p r o g r e s s ; i n c o m p l e t e d p r o j e c t s 3 . F i n i s h e d goods and goods f o r r e s a l e 4 . Advance p a y m e n t s on s t o c k s I I . R e c e i v a b l e s and o t h e r c u r r e n t a s s e t s * 1. Trade r e c e i v a b l e s 2 . Amounts due f r o m g r o u p c o m p a n i e s 3 . R e c e i v a b l e s from e n t i t i e s w i t h w h i c h t h e e n t e r p r i s e i s l i n k e d by v i r t u e o f p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t e r e s t s o f 25 % o r more 4. Other current assets III.
Securities 1. Shares i n group companies 2. Treasury stock 3. Other s e c u r i t i e s I V . C h e c k s , C a s h , D e p o s i t s w i t h F e d e r a l Bank a n d w i t h Bank o f F e d e r a l P o s t a l S y s t e m , D e p o s i t s w i t h commercial banks C. P r e p a i d Expenses Excess o f L i a b i l i t i e s o v e r Assets t o t h e e x t e n t n o t c o v e r e d by S h a r e h o l d e r s * E q u i t y *
f o r each c a p t i o n w i t h d i s c l o s u r e one y e a r
of
amounts due a f t e r
χ
χ
χ χ
χ
χ
χ χ χ more
than
128
Table
4b:
Presentation Shareholders'
of the Equity
Balance
( A s s e t s and l i a b i l i t i e s / s h a r e h o l d e r s ' by s i d e )
Liabilities
and
e q u i t y t o be p r e s e n t e d
side
M e d i u m - s i z e d and l a r g e c o r p o r a t i o n s ( f u l l presentation to the extent applicable)
Sheet
-
Small Corporations (only captions i d e n t i f i e d by l e t t e r s and Roman numbers)
L I A B I L I T I E S AHD SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY A. S h a r e h o l d e r s ' E q u i t y I · Share C a p i t a l I I . C a p i t a l Reserve I I I · Earnings Reserves 1. Legal r e s e r v e 2. Reserve for t r e a s u r y stock 3. S t a t u t o r y reserves 4. Other earnings reserves I V . Retained Earnings/Accumulated D e f i c i t brought foreward from p r i o r y e a r V· Net Income/Loss o f t h e y e a r S p e c i a l r e s e r v e s , t o be t a x e d i n l a t e r y e a r s Β. A c c r u a l s 1 . A c c r u a l s f o r p e n s i o n s and s i m i l a r o b l i g a t i o n s 2. Accrued t a x e s 3. Other accruals C. L i a b i l i t i e s * 1. Debenture loans thereof convertible 2 . Amounts due t o b a n k s 3. Advance payments r e c e i v e d 4. Trade payables 5. Notes payable 6 . Amounts due t o g r o u p c o m p a n i e s 7 . Amounts owed t o e n t i t i e s w i t h w h i c h t h e e n t e r p r i s e i s l i n k e d by v i r t u e o f p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t e r e s t s o f 25 % o r more 8. Other l i a b i l i t i e s thereof taxes thereof in respect of s o c i a l s e c u r i t y D· D e f e r r e d I n c o m e *
for
each c a p t i o n w i t h d i s c l o u r s e
of
amounts due w i t h i n
χ χ χ χ
χ χ χ χ
χ
χ one
year
C o n t i n g e n c i e s a n d Commitments Discounted notes, guarantees, guarantees given on n o t e s and loans, other warranties, p l e d g e s on company a s s e t s t o secure a n o t h e r p a r t y ^ s l i a b i l i t i e s , o t h e r c o n t i n g e n c i e s and c o m m i t m e n t s Source:
P e a t , M a r w i c k , M i t c h e l l & Co. ( H r s g . ) " E x e c u t i v e O v e r v i e w New German A c c o u n t i n g a n d R e p o r t i n g L e g i s l a t i o n " , München 1 9 8 6 , S . 33 u . 35
129
There
have
statement First
of
(see
all,
table
presently to
less
not
been
several
of earning s, the
5a)
format
has
information the
company s r e s u l t s Furthermore, mentioned earnings format
one m a j o r -
the
(new,
A comparison the cost
of
Further
it
choice of layout
companies, tion
p.
Moreover,
both
be
in
-
taken cost
the
will
format
into
cost
account
elements
profit
and
above
of
of
sales
the
profit
loss
that
to
the
of
possible
format
to
a
accounts
standard
and
clear
the
sales
leads
loss
it
that
or
the
restricted
of
different
general
account
and m e d i u m - s i z e d c o r p o r a t i o n s 1
to
5
in
the
and c a p t i o n s
first
informa-
(see
1 to
Beatge/-
the
"gross
medium-sized in
differs
the
format
significantly
results"
as
are the in
the cost
as a l i n e
henceforth
(layout
from
presented
under
to
results".
profit"
corporations first
allowed
3 and 6 i n t h e
must be m e n t i o n e d t h a t with
are
format
It
format.
a
elements.
item "gross
"gross
the
informations
line
elements)
of
cost
make
even l e s s
under t h e
the
will of
178-181).
captions
and
as lead
statement
prohibited)
formats
gives
by n a t u r a l
"gross p r o f i t "
start
-
will
my o p i n i o n ,
the
sales
small
captions This
instead of
of
to
the
elements
understanding
the type of the cost of
of
small
summarize heading
now
w h i c h means a l o w e r
regarding
Fischer,
and,
a better
presentation
format
natural
comparability
28
of
175-201).
cost
captions.
future
until
layout
either
by
from
20
aquire
natural
change a l l o w s
a
between
must
the
p.
5b).
sales
than the
presentation
operations.
format in
the
reduced only
the to
of
(see t a b l e
showing
to
in
reader
x
reader
-
in
(see B a e t g e / F i s c h e r ,
been
prescribed
enable
changes
too
by
allowed
natural
"gross
the
item
cost
cost
profit" of
or
sales
130
Table 5a:
Presentat ion of the Statement of Earnings ( V e r t i c a l format - Layout by n a t u r a l c o s t elements) (full
Large Corporations presentation to the extent
applicable)
1· Sales 2 . I n c r e a s e o r d e c r e a s e o f f i n i s h e d goods a n d w o r k i n p r o g r e s s 3 . O t h e r c a p i t a l i z e d l a b o r , o v e r h e a d s and m a t e r i a l 4 . O t h e r o p e r a t i n g income 5. M a t e r i a l s a ) Raw m a t e r i a l s , s u p p l i e s and p u r c h a s e d g o o d s b) Purchased s e r v i c e s ( e . g . u t i l i t i e s , s u b c o n t r a c t i n g c o s t s , etc. ) 6. Personnel costs a ) Wages a n d s a l a r i e s b) S o c i a l s e c u r i t y and p e n s i o n c o s t s , t h e r e o f p e n s i o n s 7 . D e p r e c i a t i o n , a m o r t i z a t i o n and s p e c i a l p r o v i s i o n s a ) on i n t a n g i b l e and t a n g i b l e a s s e t s , a n d on c a p i t a l i z e d s t a r t - u p or expansion costs b ) on c u r r e n t a s s e t s t o t h e e x t e n t u s u a l p r o v i s i o n s made by c o r p o r a t i o n s a r e e x c e e d e d 8. O t h e r o p e r a t i n g expenses 9 . I n c o m e f r o m p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t e r e s t s o f 25 % o r more t h e r e o f from group companies 1 0 . I n c o m e f r o m o t h e r s e c u r i t i e s and l o n g t e r m f i n a n c i a l i n v e s t m e n t t h e r e o f from group companies 1 1 . O t h e r i n t e r e s t and s i m i l a r income t h e r e o f from group companies 1 2 . W r i t e - d o w n o f f i n a n c i a l a s s e t s and o f s e c u r i t i e s i n c l u d e d i n current assets 1 3 . I n t e r e s t and s i m i l a r e x p e n s e s t h e r e o f t o group companies 14. Results of ordinary operations 1 5 . E x t r a o r d i n a r y income 16. E x t r a o r d i n a r y expense 17. Extraordinary, net 1 8 . T a x e s on income 19. Other t a x e s 20. Net income/loss of the year Income and expenses arising from arrangements and similar contracts separate l i n e items. Source:
profit and are to be
P e a t , M a r w i c k , M i t c h e l l & Co. ( H r s g . ) New German A c c o u n t i n g and R e p o r t i n g München 1 9 8 6 , p . 38
loss pooling presented as
" E x e c u t i v e Overview Legislation",
131
Table 5b:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19.
Presentat ion of the Statement of ( V e r t i c a l format - Cost o f s a l e s
Sales Cost of s a l e s Gross p r o f i t S e l l i n g expenses G e n e r a l a d m i n i s t r a t i o n expenses O t h e r o p e r a t i n g income Other o p e r a t i n g expenses I n c o m e f r o m p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t e r e s t s o f 25 % o r e more t h e r e o f from group companies I n c o m e f r o m o t h e r s e c u r i t i e s and l o n g t e r m l o a n s t h e r e o f from group companies O t h e r i n t e r e s t and s i m i l a r income t h e r e o f from group companies W r i t e - d o w n o f f i n a n c i a l a s s e t s and o f s e c u r i t i e s i n c l u d e d current assets I n t e r e s t and s i m i l a r e x p e n s e s t h e r e o f t o group companies Results of ordinary operations E x t r a o r d i n a r y income E x t r a o r d i n a r y expense Extraordinary, net T a x e s on income Other taxes Net income/loss of the year
Income and expenses arising from arrangements and similar contracts seperate l i n e items. Source:
3.4 The
New r e g u l a t i o n s valuation
(see H i l k e ,
assets
on
loss pooling presented as
respect
1986,
p.
applicable to
540-543
available
(licenses, acquired
eliminated;
valuation
regulations
The p r e s e n t l y been
profit and are to be
in
P e a t , M a r w i c k , M i t c h e l l & Co. ( H r s g . ) " E x e c u t i v e O v e r v i e w New German A c c o u n t i n g and R e p o r t i n g L e g i s l a t i o n " , München 1 9 8 6 , p . 4 1
been changed w i t h
1)
Earnings format)
trade
from
this
the
and H i l k e , option marks,
outside
means
to
that
corporations
following
to
1987,
the
p.
246-249):
patents)
the
have
provisions
capitalize
and of
major
intangible which
company
presently
is "may
have now be
132
capitalized"
will
henceforth
be
capitalized"
(see
Meyer,
151?
p.
changed
into
"must
be
Göllert/Ringling,
p.
8) . 2)
Until
now,
those
expenses
of
the
companies
incurred
business?
extended
were
even
in
to
only
in
connection
the
those
allowed
future
o f t h e new German c o m m e r c i a l 3)
For
all
record
corporations
a
a
tax
deferred
Steuen"). the
Deferred
profit
higher
in
than
statements
the
which
asset
assets
profit
start-up
are
will
be
incurred (see
will
be
in
§ 2 69
available
("aktivische
arise for
shown
to
the
option
law).
accounts
according
capitalize
the business
new o p t i o n
tax
the
with
this
expenses
connection w i t h the expansion of
to
in
situations
taxation
in
the
commercial
where
purposes
annual
law
(see
to
latente is
financial Siegel,
p.
137-174). 4)
Only
corporations
the
special
temporar y for 5)
decrease contrary
on
assets
for
be
special
applicable p.
110?
apply
are
made
Glade, far
not
p.
of
specific
1987,
available
p.
depreciation
years
This,
reason
no
longer
see
Meyer,
however,
and
allowances
tax
regulations
248).
carry
notes
to
wick/Mitchell,
financial p.
Only
corporations
price
increase
statements
regulations
which (see
forward
t h e amount o f t h e p o s s i b l e
tax
does
T h i s means t h a t
option to
except t h a t to
assets
the
is
("Beibehaltungswahlrecht")
due
b e made
current
allowance
119-135).
must
statements
be
a
247-248).
values
taken
the
or
only
special
following
assets,
account
1987,
against
depreciation
basis
1591? H i l k e ,
book
changed,
p.
special
presently
reduced
the
into
"Wertaufholungsgebot" ?
Treuberg,
to
law,
depreciation
on t h e
p.
the
in
fixed
can h e n c e f o r t h
(see H i l k e ,
present
if
within
take
allowances
(so-called
von
not
to
that
to
value
and
reverse d
the
in
investments
Moreover, fixed
regard
depreciation
financial
must
6)
must
has
not
write-up
disclosed
(see
so the
in
Peat/Mar-
13). will
no l o n g e r
reserve
prepared
in
according
be a l l o w e d t o
the to
statutory the
set
up a
financial
commercial
law,
133
whereas t h i s sheet 7)
In
the
1,
must b e c o v e r e d by a p p r o p r i a t e
1987 p.
But
obligations
pension
(see
to
year
to
present
which
and
three
of
set
accruals Cölbe/-
pensions
granted
be
accrued;
benefits
before
sheet
be
new
the
for
same
pensions
January
range of
1,
1987
regarding
date 1986,
option
1986,
528).
accrue
to
accrue
tax
liabilties up
for
taxation
law
also
where is
balance
example:
that
vague
remains
a (see
at
and the
67-81).
("passivische
purposes
statutory (for
such expenses
situations
or
end
conditions rather
By will
internal
operations
are p.
company
at yearxs
The
accruals
the
accruals:
the
future
by
529-535). for
set
in
caused
(see Kupsch,
Deferred
the
b a s i s must law e n l a r g e s
for
or e x i s t i n g
said
must
in
existed of
to
p.
of
company's d i s c r e t i o n
shown
material
p.
on a v o l u n t a r y
overheads
set-up
commercial
Peat/Mar-
disposed
expense e q u a l i z a t i o n
and
accounts
first
526-527).
waste
be p r o p e r l y
new German c o m m e r c i a l
incurred before
be
p.
for
(see P e a t / M a r w i c k / M i t c h e l l ,
p.
situation
decision
(see
1986, of
up
business
the
year
"Aufwandsrückstellungen 11
new
the
within
disposal
and must
year
the so-called
Küting/Weber,
set
old
provided t h e waste m a t e r i a l
expenses
allow
performed
the
(see § 249) .
the
so-called the
must t o b e
business
work performed
Furthermore,
have
accruals
Küting/Weber,
following
now b e a c c r u e d
12)
after
von
h a v e b e e n made i n
15; up,
Küting/Weber,
Guarantee
law,
the
p.
accruals
now be
balance
the
granted
Busse
from
pension
granted
actually
months
within the
the
15;
need n o t
in
should
will
Moreover, must
11)
p.
arising
1987
originally
wick/Mitchell,
15;
commitments
Ringwald).
Contrary
at
1,
increases
were
balance
196-297).
January to
repairs
10)
pension
Chmielewicz,
which
in the tax
542).
new
applies
9)
p.
Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
prior
8)
c a n be r e f l e c t e d
1986,
future,
January (see
reserve
(see H i l k e ,
latente the
lower sheet
Steuern")
profit
in
than the
profit
according
s e t t i n g up a p r i c e
the to
increase
134 reserve
in
commercial taxes
appears
deferred apt
tax
to
tax
balance
sheet).
the
of
the
but
the
not
deferred value
(see S i e g e l ,
p.
financial
the
deferred
to
tax
of
in
of
requirement
against
informative
statements
Expansion
sheet,
Capitalization
questionable; liabilities
impair
financial
3.5
the
balance
set
off
assets
a
is
company's
137-174).
statements
of
corporate
entities Up t o
now,
report sheet In
only
stock corporation s
("Geschäftsbericht") and s t a t e m e n t
the
future,
ments
of
all
account,
a
of
corporate
a)
the
"notes t o
b)
the
"report
financial
the
earnings 264
of
three true
all
private
have t o
parts
With
respect
financial certain
to
of
p.
are
have
to
state-
be t a k e n
("Anhang")
into
and
and p o s i t i o n
the
an §§
prescribed
182-189;
sheet
of
and
of
284 for
the
FRG-
law
of
to
financial
the
corporations seems
and 285 large p.
up t o
to 70
to
present
be
almost
different
corporations 27-31).
a
and
notes to
§
these
to give the reader and t h e
that
Göllert/Ringling,
than
According
reporting
reporting,
all
extent
in
more
and s t a t e m e n t
statements.
assets,
objective
to
the
even
i n order
net
this
to
i.e.
companies
accounting
company.
According
-
financial
s t a t e m e n t s now r e q u i r e
incredible:
financial
statements
balance
of the
disclosures
disclosures Meyer,
to
German
view
income p o s i t i o n
annual balance
financial
liability
must f o r m a n u n i t y
and f a i r
the
development
corporations
limited
notes
new
will
on n o t e s t o
supplement t h e i r
with the
an
their
("Lagebericht").
In
400.000
of
statements"
economic
Expanded r e g u l a t i o n s
will
expansion entities
a)
future,
prepare to
to
on t h e
t h e company"
had t o
addition
earnings.
double
with regard
in
And
(see even
135
small
corporations
new r e p o r t i n g For
a
better
regulations the
fulfill
to
about
of
the
financial
schedules
80
percent
(see G ö l l e r t / R i n g l i n g ,
understanding
on n o t e s
following
Table 6:
must
requirements
contents
statements
(see t a b l e
of p.
of
let
these 26).
the
us
new
examine
6).
R e g u l a t i o n s on n o t e s t o f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( t o be p r e p a r e d by a l l c o r p o r a t i o n s )
Firstly, the notes t o financial statements must include all d i s c l o s u r e s w h i c h a p p e a r n e c e s s a r y t o g i v e t h e r e a d e r a t r u e and f a i r v i e w o f t h e n e t a s s e t s , f i n a n c i a l and income p o s i t i o n o f t h e company. I n p a r t i c u l a r , i f a p p l i c a b l e , t h e f o l l o w i n g f a c t s need t o be d i s c u s s e d : Change i n t h e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e b a l a n c e of earnings v i s - à - v i s the p r i o r year Prior
year
numbers a r e n o t c o m p a r a b l e
Breakdown by l i n e s Details of statement of
of business
captions earnings
(if
summarized
sheet
or were
or
statement
restated
applicable) in
the
balance
sheet
or
Comments on r e c e i v a b l e s sheet date
which l e g a l l y
arise
only a f t e r
balance
Comments on l i a b i l i t i e s sheet date
which l e g a l l y
arise
only
balance
Development sheet)
of
fixed
assets
(if
not
Changes i n s h a r e h o l d e r s '
equity
Details
expenses and
of
Amount o f
extraordinary
and a l l o w a n c e s b a s e d on s p e c i a l
Contingencies
e
and
commitments
page)
in
the
balance
income
n e c e s s a r y w r i t e - u p s w a i v e d due t o t a x
Depreciation
( c o n t i n u e d on
presented
after
tax
considerations regulations
136
(Table
6
continued)
In addition, the following require discussion i n the notes t o f i n a n c i a l statements:
-
A c c o u n t i n g and v a l u a t i o n p r i n c i p l e s
-
Method o f t r a n s l a t i n g Deutsche Mark
yes
yes
yes
yes
Changes i n a c c o u n t i n g and v a l u a t i o n m e t h o d s i n comparison t o methods used i n p r i o r y e a r , and t h e r e s p e c t i v e e f f e c t on n e t a s s e t s and income
yes
yes
D i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n book v a l u e s a n d v a l u e s a t l a t e s t s t o c k exchange o r market p r i c e s i n case of group, L i f o or F i f o v a l u a t i o n
yes
yes
I n c l u s i o n o f i n t e r e s t on b o r r o w e d f u n d s i n manufacturing cost or cost of f i x e d assets c o n s t r u c t e d by t h e company
yes
yes
T o t a l of l i a b i l i t i e s f i v e years
yes
yes
yes
yes
foreign
D e t a i l s of l i a b i l i t i e s t h a n f i v e y e a r s and o f
after
into
more t h a n
with description
r e p a y a b l e a f t e r more secured l i a b i l i t i e s
yes
no
T o t a l o f o t h e r f i n a n c i a l commitments w h i c h are not r e f l e c t e d i n the balance sheet (exc e p t f o r c o n t i n g e n c i e s and c o m m i t m e n t s ) . Commitments v i s - à - v i s g r o u p c o m p a n i e s n e e d t o be d i s c l o s e d s e p a r a t e l y
yes
no
Breakdown o f s a l e s by b u s i n e s s l i n e s a n d g e o g r a p h i c a l m a r k e t s (can be s p a r e d , i f d i s c l o s u r e w o u l d c a u s e s i g n i f i c a n t harm)
no
no
Effect purely
yes
no
on n e t income o f d e p r e c i a t i o n for tax considerations
E f f e c t o f t a x e s on r e s u l t s t i o n s a n d on e x t r a o r d i n a r y -
currencies
repayable
T o t a l of secured l i a b i l i t i e s of s e c u r i t i e s
-
A l s o t o be p r e s e n t e d by c o r p o r a t i o n s which are c l a s s i f i e d as MediumSmall Sized
A v e r a g e number o f
( c o n t i n u e d on
e
of ordinary results
e m p l o y e e s by g r o u p s
page)
taken opera-
yes
yes
yes
no
137 (Table -
6
continued)
I n case t h e cost of s a l e s p r e s e n t a t i o n i s u s e d , i n f o r m a t i o n on m a t e r i a l and p e r s o n n e l costs, according to the presentation i n the n a t u r a l cost elements p r e s e n t a t i o n
yes
F o r members o f t h e management g r o u p , t h e supervisory board or the advisory board, s e p a r a t e l y f o r each group - t o t a l remuneration for the year - t o t a l r e m u n e r a t i o n f o r f o r m e r members o f s u c h g r o u p s a s w e l l a s a c c r u a l s s e t up f o r s u c h p e r s o n s , g i v i n g a l s o t h e amounts n o t c o v e r e d by a c c r u a l s - a d v a n c e s and l o a n s g r a n t e d , p r o v i d i n g d e t a i l s on i n t e r e s t r a t e s and t e r m s , and a l s o c o n tingencies entered i n t o for the b e n e f i t of such persons -
-
yes yes
no no
yes
yes
yes
yes
Name and r e s i d e n c e o f c o m p a n i e s i n w h i c h t h e r e - y e s p o r t i n g e n t i t y h o l d s more t h a n 20 % o f s h a r e s a s w e l l a s t h e l a t e s t a v a i l a b l e n e t income o f s u c h companies ( t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n can be s p a r e d i f i m m a t e r i a l o r i f d i s c l o s u r e c o u l d mean harm t o t h e company)
yes
Major
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
A l l members o f t h e management g r o u p a n d s u p e r v i s o r y body, i n d i c a t i n g chairman or chairman p o s i t i o n
items
vice
i n c l u d e d under o t h e r a c c r u a l s
Reason f o r d e p r e c i a t i n g g o o d w i l l o v e r t h e expected period of b e n e f i t r a t h e r than the g e n e r a l l y p r e s c r i b e d 25 % p . a . , s t a r t i n g i n the year a f t e r acquisition -
no as regards material
Name and r e s i d e n c e o f t h e p a r e n t company o f c o r p o r a t i o n which prepares group accounts
the
(Further, t h e r e a r e a d d i t i o n a l d i s c l o s u r e s t o be notes t o f i n a n c i a l statements under t h e p r o v i s i o n s c o r p o r a t i o n law) Source:
made i n t h e of the stock
P e a t , M a r w i c k , M i t c h e l l & Co. ( H r s g . ) " E x e c u t i v e O v e r v i e w New German A c c o u n t i n g and R e p o r t i n g L e g i s l a t i o n " , München 1 9 8 6 , p . 4 5 , 47 u . 49
138
b)
Report
on
the
economic
development
and
position
of
the
the
new
company In
addition
reporting report
to
the
notes
requirements
on
the
to
now
economic
financial include
statements,
for
development
all
and
corporations
position
of
a the
company. In this
report
the
following
Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
p.
facts
51;
need t o be d e s c r i b e d
Küting/Weber,
1986,
(see
p.
1386-
1397) : Development of
of
the
business
t h e company so t h a t
(this
means
cost,
utilization structural
of
a true revenues,
capacity,
events a f t e r
bookings,
company.
and
to
auditing.
contrary joint
to
in
present
stock
§ law
companies,
large
not
but
corporations.
companies their
around will
business
around
2.000
statutory
order
be
date.
(including
if
(For
law
stock
private a
the
1987
limited
corporations
have
as
the Up
liability
conservative first
until
been
and
medium-sized
limited
for
comparison:
that-
corporations
first
private
in
requires
categorized
Following
audited
stock
new
only
also
300.000
life!
as
development).
the
c o m p a n i e s must now b e a u d i t e d estimation,
well
requirements
316 -
given
production, as
sheet
activities
development
is
discussed).
Expected development of t h e and
position
picture
investments,
Research
3 . 6 A u d i t i n g and p u b l i c a t i o n
In
economic
the balance
amount s p e n t on r e s e a r c h
or
the
and f a i r
changes need t o be
Significant
As
and
liability time now,
subject
in only
to
a
audit).
to
the
following
Not
only
but
also
the the
imagine
the
whole
activities
must
balance notes
sheet to
the
volume also
and
the
be
of
forthcoming
taken
statement
financial
into of
statements
audit
account: earnings, and
the
139
report
on
company
the
must
economic
be 11
schaftsprüfer
development
examined
,
the
from
now
and
on
German e q u i v a l e n t
position
(usually of
of
by
a
the
"Wirt-
a Certified
Public
Accountant). Further,
all
corporations
(even
the
small
exempt from t h e a u d i t i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s ) financial depends from
statements.
on t h e
filing
size
only
Gazette
of
scope
the
certain
to the publication Federal
The
of
documents
the entire
3.7
Effective
"The
new
commencing new
law
on o r
ends
a
stub
1987.
January as
An e a r l i e r
trade
all
1987. the
business
December
for
31,
1987,
introduced
which
application
of
the
Numerous
simplifications
have been
avoid
taxation
burdens
will
the
new
consequences. not
be
This
incurred
Provisions follows p.
avoiding
transition (see
consequences
old to the
Küting/Weber,
law
its
p.
in 15).
facilitate
in
order
a
result
to tax of
law.
taxation
from t h e
as
in and
additional
companies
the
annual
begins
to
methods
means t h a t
by
i n t r o d u c i n g t h e new a c c o u n t i n g
the
introduced
accounting
years
except
new
(Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
to
the are
T h i s means t h a t earliest
is permissible"
transition
in
details
entirety
the
register
statements more
range
transition
to
1,
is
the
Some
for
at
of
period
required
3.
applies
applicable
statements
where in
law
after
becomes
financial cases
d a t e and p r o v i s i o n s
are their
requirements
with
("Bundesanzeiger").
accounting
publication The
financial
shown i n t h e a b o v e m e n t i o n e d t a b l e
which
have t o p u b l i s h
of
company:
ones
1986,
and
new l a w a r e p.
1937-1959?
simplifying furnished
as
Coenenberg,
19-20): It
is
permissible
undervalued but,
in
fixed
such
to
carry
assets
cases,
forward
the
book
(see G ö l l e r t / R i n g l i n g ,
the
book
value
of
value p.
of 34);
depreciable
140
assets
must
be
depreciated
over
the
remaining
d u r i n g w h i c h t h e a s s e t s a r e e x p e c t e d t o be "The
undervaluation
tained,
provided
undervaluation.
affecting
amount
of
the
write-up
increasing
set
overstated
up.
to
debiting
the
the
It
is
not
on
figures
of
is
the
9.
1938-1939).
If
the
the
net
cost
with
the
past
in
the
in the
first
accounting
not
necessary
cost
year
of
4.1
the
accounting
of
may
assts
high
cost
in
p.
group
7th
and
reporting
of
the
followed. comparative
can or
1986,
only
time
be
delay, original
23) .
accounting
EC D i r e c t i v e
by
statements
(see Küting/Weber,
fixed
be the
adopting
present
to
17).
principles to
by
numerous group
and
reporting,
Directive essential
companies
changes
("Konzern")
considered.
Requirements ments -
Until
p.
the been
affecting
financial
c a u s e d b y t h e a d o p t i o n o f t h e 7 t h EC
in
not
general
appropriate
year
to
the
or
liabilities
without
notes
unreasonably
changes
such
recorded
b o o k v a l u e s may b e u s e d a s f i c t i t i o u s
Essential
must b e
in
considered
reserve
(see G ö l l e r t / R i n g l i n g ,
By a d o p t i n g
had
applies
Understated
preceding
original
determined
4.
in
it
main-
reserve,
(Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
report
changes
Moreover,
in
same
amount
necessary
to
be cover
can be
earnings
which
earnings
income s t a t e m e n t "
may
regulations
the write-up an
The
accruals.
increased
assets
tax
income s t a t e m e n t b y c r e d i t i n g to
accruals
properly
current the
Otherwise,
without
new l a w
of
that
years
used.
now,
required
to
to
prepare
consolidated
financial
companies t o be c o n s o l i d a t e d and s i z e on
the
prepare
whole,
only
consolidated
stock
state-
criteria
corporations
financial
statements.
were In
141
the
future,
g r o u p a c c o u n t s must be p r e p a r e d w h e n e v e r a
i s h e a d e d by
(any k i n d of)
These group accounts the of
report
p o s i t i o n of "Generally, where
the
rights of
all the
management
dinated
In general, 19) .
In
financial
statement
statements,
economic
and
development
and
group.
company
right
to
or
the
of are
holds
appoint
the
the
majority
majority
administrative
considered
to
of
body
of
b e members
of
group
future,
accounts"
worldwide
of
voting members
the
subor-
the
group.
(Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
financial
or
the
d o m e s t i c and f o r e i g n g r o u p c o m p a n i e s must
the
the
consolidated
c o m p a n i e s w h i c h a r e u n d e r common c o n t r o l ,
all
in
279):
sheet,
consolidated
the
company,
included
the
holding
or
(see §
balance
and t h e n o t e s t o
on
group
corporation.
include
consolidated earnings
a
a
statements
be p.
must
be
included
in
presented. Until
now,
only
such group possible
accounts;
of
the
on a v o l u n t a r y
Consolidated two
domestic
the
financial following
reporting
balance
date
§ 293) .
(see
companies inclusion
had of
to
be
foreign
companies
was
basis. statements terms
of
must
size
be
have
prepared been
met
only on
s h e e t d a t e and t h e p r e c e d i n g b a l a n c e
Balance sheet t o t a l DM m i l
Sales DM m i l
if the
sheet
Number o f employees
Before eliminations
more t h a n
46.8
96.0
500
Consolidated:
more t h a n
39.0
80.0
500
4.2
New p r i n c i p l e
of uniform
The
individual
financial
companies
which
are
to
be
valuation statements included
in
of
subordinated
the
consolidated
142
financial
statements
must
principle
of
accounting;
future, be
the
applied
uniform
unifor m valuation
(see
Heinen,
statements, of
financial
statements
the
An e x e m p t i o n permitted
if
original
19-20;
4.3 The
p.
following see Meyer,
between
the
book
acquisition assets
greatest only
as
the
provides the
other the
all
expenses, the
quota
a
principle
the
of
individual
companies.
preclude
valuation
the
is
modification vis-â-vis
Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
p.
method"
of
to
if
the
be
(or
right,
of
the
must
difference
cost
and
is
the
be
allocated
acquired
allowed
time
company
to
to
the
p.
21);
presented
as be
from
be
of
a s a w h o l e c a n no l o n g e r
arising
to
the
at
(see P e a t / M a r w i c k / M i t c h e l l , any,
be
"purchase
the
investment
consolidated
now
consolidation
of
accounts".
hand,
the that
new joint
financial
method and
(see
to
(Peat/Marwick/Mitchell,
German ventures
statements Sigle,
liabilities,
incorporated
equal
must
T h i s means t h a t
the difference
option
equity
"Anglo-Saxon 212).
"difference
assets are
in
of
consolidated
former
equity
value
equity
consolidated
consolidation that
must
in
shareholders'
possible
Thus,
shareholders'
company
the principle
uniform
shareholders'
the p.
remainder,
presented
On
of
liabilities
extent
the
(see
a participation
and
"goodwill".
of
the
c o n s o l i d a t i o n purposes
sheet
equity, of
for
of
method";
the
the
applied
the
in
210-211).
consolidation
shareholders'
replace
regulations
New c o n s o l i d a t i o n
performed
Thus,
observed
rules
following words:
the parent
new p r i n c i p l e
tax
by
other
of the subordinated
balance
Meyer,
of
be
will
of v a l u a t i o n p r i n c i p l e s the
in
383-385).
to
valuation
on t h i s
only
p.
as
financial
prepared
principles
valuation,
dominance
be
the p.
in
the
p.
commercial may b e
321-336).
group
interest
in
21).
Thus,
well
quota
"This
means
as
income
joint
the
in
the
accounts the
now
included
following
as
law
net
only
and with
venture" assets,
143
financial
p o s i t i o n and r e s u l t s
(see S i g l e ,
4.4
p.
Intercompany p r o f i t / l o s s
First
of
all
Directive have
it
-
1987,
p.
profits
in
services
and
the
would
exemption notes
in
is
to
Equity
For of
p.
p.
their
reporting is
voting
to
p.
the
to
the
company
the
interest
in
Mitchell,
p.
intercompany
losses w i l l
have
can be w a i v e d i f
sales terms
usual market
to
profits/losses
If,
be
however,
discussed
statements"
in
this the
(Peat/Mar-
the
for
so-called
a
Such a s s o c i a t e d
a
holds
company
(see
more §
method"
companies
firms
can be
influenced
policies?
party
"equity
"associated"
significantly
financing
of
companies
(but
regarding
this
situation
than
20
311?
(see
% of
is the
Peat/Marwick/-
21). " e q u i t y method" o f
shares,
investment in
only
expense.
needs
losses
Küting/Weber,
the
"associated"
236).
if
shareholders'
of
at
and
(see
intercompany
purposes,
and
According t o the in
rule
financial
required
exist
rights
Mitchell,
tion
for
necessarily)
business
deemed
the
this
not
7 t h EC
21-23).
195 and p .
not
this
unreasonable
accounting
group
are
of
profits
intercompany
rendered
consolidated
accounting
Meyer,
an
applied,
the
wick/Mitchell,
4.5
"However,
calculation
result
b a s e d on t h e
accounting
also
w e r e made o r
-
intercompany
Furthermore,
f r o m now o n ,
t o be e l i m i n a t e d . or
for
German g r o u p
303-310).
but,
clearly
elemination
must b e m e n t i o n e d t h a t
definitions
changed
c a n b e d i s c l o s e d more
330-334).
equity are
to
in the
associated
21? M e y e r ,
the
company,
simultaneously
account
proportion the
of
accounting a l l
p.
the
books
holding company
236-242).
after
debited of
or the
company's (see
movements acquisicredited holding share
of
Peat/Marwick/-
144
4.6
Effective
date
For
business
years
1990
the
will
be
But t h e
of
those
statutory new l a w
5· The
groups
audit
main
must
be
applied
which
requirement
consequences law,
were as o f
of
the
i n my o p i n i o n ,
January
1,
and
reporting
of
annual
financial
since
January
already the
1,
subject
effective
p.
new
will
To r e a d a n d t o a n a l y s e a n n u a l more in
difficult,
the
1986 to
date
of
a the
17).
Numerous
statement
of
will
be
divided
the so-called the
in
(and
companies.
With
respect
two
to
the
numerous
corporations annual
To
subjugate
liability
or
on
notes
more
which
new will
financial
law
t a x a t i o n purposes
for
statements
less
will
informations one
hand
on
financial
some l a r g e
expensive)
different
commercial
of
the
and
and
hand.
publishing,
small
the
financial
and e v e n
into
accounting
following:
small
"BetriebsaufSpaltung"),
obligatory
facilities
be t h e
earnings
by
on t h e o t h e r
medium-sized
German
because
information-overloading statements
4)
after
Some c o n s e q u e n c e s o f t h e new l a w
given
3)
or
accounting
concerning the a u d i t
companies
become
2)
on
group
(see P e a t / M a r w i c k / M i t c h e l l ,
reporting 1)
commence for
effective. regulations
statements for
which
new r e g u l a t i o n s
companies
i n order
audit are
corporations
and
only
in
the
available
for
future
statements:
publication
(by avoid
use
publishing
to
to
requirements, prepare
one a c c o r d i n g
and a n o t h e r
one
two to for
only.
more
companies
than to
300.000
an o b l i g a t o r y
private audit
limited
f r o m now on
145
seems t o me n o t h i n g b u t a g r e a t tried
to
solve
accountants.
the
scheme b y w h i c h
lawyers
p r o b l e m on u n e m p l o y e d a t t o r n e y s
and
146 References BAETGE,
J./FISCHER,
Th.:
"Zur
und V e r l u s t r e c h n u n g für
Aussagefähigkeit
n a c h neuem R e c h t " ,
Betriebswirtschaf t.
der
in:
Gewinn-
Zeitschrift
Ergänzungsheft
1/1987,
p.
175ff. BUSSE VON CÖLBE,
W./CHMIELEWICZ,
linien-Gesetz", (1986),
p.
COENENBERG,
A.G.
al.:
Texte.
HEINEN, E . : W. :
Recht
W. :
das
des
Handelsbilanzen.
Heidelberg
12.
Auflage,
Wiesbaden
Überblick",
vergleichender (WISU). bei
den
(WISin . 5 / 1 9 8 7 ,
und
Κ./WEBER, Kommentar
Buchen
C.-P. zur
Einfüh-
(Sonderveröf-
-
p.
11/1986,
nach
(Ed.):
neuem
p.
539
1986
und in:
245
in:
dem
altem Das
ff.
Bewertungswahlrechten
durch
Das
Wirtschafts-
Neues
Bilanzieren.
ff.
L./LEUZ,
S t u t t g a r t / B a d Wörishofen
1986
1986
nach
ein
neuem
Bilanzricht-
"Bilanzierungswahlrechte
KRESSE, W·/KOTSCH-FASSHAUER,
-
nach
1986
Bilanzrichtlinien-Gesetz",
Prüfen
Jg.
Betriebs-Beraters)
"Änderungen
studium
KÜTING,
Einzelbilanz
Bilanzrichtlinien-Gesetz.
Materialien.
Wirtschaftsstudium W. :
46.
1986
Herne/Berlin
Κ./RINGLING,
fentlichung
HILKE,
Die
R e c h n u n g s l e g u n g und P r ü f u n g n a c h dem
rung.
HILKE,
Bilanzricht-
Betriebswirtschaf t.
Düsseldorf
linien-Gesetz. GÖLLERT,
Die
"Das n e u e
ff. et
Handelsrecht. GLADE, Α . :
in:
289
K. :
N.:
Bilanzrichtlinien-Gesetz.
1986 Handbuch d e r
Bilanzierung
und
Rechnungslegung
Prüfun g.
Stuttgart
147
RÜTING,
Κ./WEBER,
C.-P.:
"Einzelfragen
Zwischenergebnissen unter
besonderer
scher Aspekte",
P. :
konzernbilanzpoliti-
Zeitschrift
C.:
der
und
3.
5.
2 HGB",
Auflage, Bd.
Auflage,
PEAT/MARWICK/MITCHELL German
Bewertung
von in:
Accounting
p.
nach
II:
67
dem
Herne/Berlin Einführung
(Ed.):
and
Zeitschrift
unter Bilanz-
1986
in
das
neue
1986
Executive
Reporting
für
ff.
und S t e u e r r e c h t
Wiesbaden
& CO.
Aufwandsrück-
1/1987,
Konzernrechnungslegung
Bilanzlehre.
Bilanzrecht.
Betriebswirtschaf t.
ff.
nach H a n d e l s -
richtlinien-Gesetz. A. :
299
für
Ergänzungsheft
Bilanzierung
Einschluß
MOXTER,
p.
§ 249 A b s .
Betriebswirtschaf t. MEYER,
von
Berücksichtigung
1/1987,
nach
Eliminierung
Konzernbilanzrecht-
"Bilanzierung
stellungen
der
neuem
in:
Ergänzungsheft KUPSCH,
nach
Overview
Legislation.
New
München
1986 RINGWALD,
R. :
(WISU). SIEGEL,
"Rückstellungen",
6/1986,
Th.:
1/1987,
"Latente
SIGLE,
H.:
p.
Ergänzungsheft H.
von:
Zeitschrift
1/1987,
p.
119
nach
Betriebswirtschaf t.
§ 247 HGB",
und in:
Ergänzungsheft
ff.
in:
Zeitschrift
1/1987, "Die
p.
für ff.
321
und
Aspekte für
der
Quotenkon-
Betriebswirtschaf t.
ff.
Bedeutung
betriebswirtschaftlicher in:
Wirtschaftsstudium
Konzeptionsprobleme
Bilanzierung
"Betriebswirtschaftliche
solidierung",
TREUBERG,
Steuern:
zur
für 137
Das
Studienblatt
Anwendungsfragen Zeitschrift
in:
der
Wertauf holung
bilanzpolitischer
Betriebswirtschaf t.
aus
Sicht",
Ergänzungsheft
The F o r e i g n T r a d e S t r u c t u r e
Takashi
1.
Japan
Natsugi
Introduction
Beginning been
in
the
steadily
spring
on t h e
of
driving
factor
weakening
of
by t h e y e n ' s the
other
in
the
1983,
way t o
down a r o u n d t h e m i d d l e o f
in
of
the
U.S.
1985.
past,
are
but
slacked
economy
imports
Japanese
Exports,
it
economy
slow
which were t h e
main
in
line
further
showing
signs
with
a
decelerated
s i n c e t h e autumn o f
now
had
began t o
off
and w e r e
sharp a p p r e c i a t i o n
hand
the
recovery,
of
1985.
On
increasing
volume.
Effects
of
the
the
Japanese
the
surplus
continued quarter
and
trade the With
attempt
of to
istics
and
effects
of
will
on be
the
to
are
estimated
to
trade
to
the
for
be
gradual
in
the
in
1985.
so-called
crude
around
and
Concretely, balance
billion
same p e r i o d
attributed price
only
growing.
$14.6
% from t h e
as
a
background,
foreign
trade
explanations
changes.
One
the yen's
rise
GNP,
still
oil.
$90.0
has first This
J-curve
The billion
total for
1986.
facts give
trade
is
merchandise
declining
is
on
amounting
mainly
year
these
analysis
those
is
surplus
fiscal
Japan's up 63
the
yen
imbalance
grow,
1986,
development effect
in
to
of
stronger
trade
prices,
considered.
we
will
structure for
recent
the
of
start Japan
structural
topic
of
and
and
business
the then
character-
importance,
on t h e J a p a n e s e economy,
employment
with
the
including activities,
150
2.
The f o r e i g n t r a d e
The
Japanese
its
expansion.
economy
the
private 1980
terms of
exports a trade
we
faced
observe
at
investment 85.
From
quite
the
the
in
it
surpluses
same
to
see a
time the
and
of
in the
foreign
trade
of Japan.
growth. 1983-85
that
in
It
that But
private in
1984-
Japan,
it
is
imports
is
to
be
had been
changes
In
trade.
active and
deficits
structural
decades
cycle
recession.
60s t r a d e
In
two
after
2
also
increasing
growth.
last
was o n l y
foreign
Table was
trade
exports
period
1950s
in
equipment of
It
and Also
economic
in
period
roles.
was i n t h e y e a r s
t o t h e Japanese economic the
to
imbalance,
viewpoint
during the
growth.
much
for
components
consumption
important
with
and
exports
of
In the recession
sustained
the
on
shares
government
contributed large
country
depend
(GNE).
shock,
played
plant
normal
creasing that
in
always
formation
consumption
J a p a n was
not
1 shows p e r c e n t a g e
oil
capital
that
according t o
expenditure
first
government
did
Table
i n gross n a t i o n a l after
structure
noted
barriers
c a n be
I n the world t o t a l ,
de-
observed the
trade
s u r p l u s e s w h i c h were r e c o r d e d around 1970 were o f
reasonable
amounts.
running
deficit very
In
large
before. more
the
(see
and
in
reached
the
level
trade
average
1985
trade
of
one
frictions
b e t w e e n J a p a n and h e r
changes
statistics
developed exports
will
of
the
share
surpassed t h e recovery
was
surpluses digit have
trade
of
this
larger
partners
a
became
been
imports
change
when we s e e
according much
area area
recorded
shares are observable structural
clearer
declined
developed
level of
be
Japan
countries
to
relative the
on
But
than
debated
since
the
1980s.
Structural trade
trade
3) .
Correspondingly,
acutely
early
1970s,
Table
to in
regions. the
recovered in
the
1969 t o
foreign
Trade
1970s. markedly
overall
1971.
was m o d e r a t e .
the
In
world
essentially
attributed
the total hand
movements
in trade with the developing area.
c a n be
1985
and
On t h e o t h e r
Reverse
with
to
in The
enhanced
151
oil
prices,
Middle
because Japan imports
East.
Trade
with
crude
Africa
oil
mainly
declined
in
from
1985
the
rather
sharply. Concerning
structural
surpluses Kingdom
in
changes
in
Surpluses in
the
is
then
issue
the
with
the
the
natural Japan
surpluses, supported the
yen
shock o f
and
fall
without the
that
the
strong
developed of
surpluses with
Japan.
In
areas,
developing
Canada
products
newly
to
sharp
yen
mitigating
deficits is
do
not
inevitable
economic Relative
to
that
stages
these
from
and
shares
of
trade
were
declining,
products
have
not
must
producing
countries
1 9 7 0 s due t o t h e been
smaller
more
than
In
almost such
will
all as
first
for
Indonesia
cut
in
because half
labortrade
factor.
through to
countries of
crisis.
prices
recently.
for But
like years.
with
oil-
Arabia
has
These crude
both
the
primary
several
Trade Saudi
It
exporting.
t h e y w e r e enormous
and s e c o n d o i l
1985
go
last
and
like Japan
export
them p r i c e s oil.
trade
from
negative
in the
crude
main
have
countries
developing
into deficits?
in
they
substitution
with
severe
countries
these
nations
because
that value
are
and t h e y
a
been f a v o r a b l e
import
always been running became
in
trade
the
Australia
Japan
indicate
import
Thailand Japan
and
necessarily
in
year.
industrializing
Japan.
It
main
apprecia-
the
turn
development
1985.
policy
for
products
rate
the
increase
goods e x p o r t e d
economic
are
America.
in
Korea and T a i w a n need m a n u f a c t u r e d intensive
United
a high
became
economic
in the past
countries,
primary
of at
could have r a i s e d
US-dollar,
t h e Yen u p s u r g e
exporters
The
American
the
the
$40 b i l l i o n
The e a r l y
US d o l l a r ,
against
States
friction
U.S.A.
1985.
and
increased
nearly
country,
More r e m a r k a b l e
United
trade
the
of
to
Germany
1980s.
the U.S.A.
1970s and amounted t o quite
according
F.R.
in
with
trade
began i n t h e
Among
with
greatly
trade
in
between
tion
of
trade
increased
changes
in
the
deficits oil
exports
have and
152
imports
with
relatively Trade
oil-producing
but also
with
the
promising.
3.
P.R.
But t h e
new e c o n o m i c
large
understand
imbalance,
Exports and
main
of
First
taking
cities
are
U.S.A. by
export
are,
of
and change
the
Japanese
and i m p o r t
factors into
in
the
are
income
as
estimated
relative
can
figure
coefficients
function.
for
and
we
Japan,
Table
the
4
functions,
for for
Korea,
see for
t h e F.R.Germany.
from Korea %.
we
2.21
a proportional
is
one
and
roughly
income 1.13
the
When w o r l d by 4 . 2
increase
structural
Korea
are
in
speaking,
elastifor
relation
imports
grow from
sensitive
to
exports
to world
characteristics the
the
% and t h o s e
and t h e F.R.Germany a r e s t i m u l a t e d o n l y t o t h e
of
But
increase
that Japan,
by
Japan
for
shows
U.S.A.,
U.S.A.
the
and
consumption
Japan
of
trade
functions
a type of
logarithm,
linear
estimation
export
2.2
1985 caused a
Korea.
4.21
and 0 . 9 8
appears
functions
respectively,
data
this
1 %, e x p o r t s
only
internationally.
elasticities
and
not
and
in
characteristics
estimate
variables
results
growing
recorded
and i m p o r t
explanatory
and p r i c e
F.R.Germany,
surpluses
state
Transforming
income
been
present
results
explanatory the
the
and i m p o r t s
their
price.
declined
China.
export
we w i l l
compare t h e
has
structural
3 . 1 Estimation of To
China
issue with
Explanation of
countries
absolutely.
that
from
the
extent
imports. exports
expansion
of
It from
world
trade. Price Korea,
elasticity but
it
is
of
exports
less
than
i s e s t i m a t e d t o be v e r y h i g h unity
in
the
U.S.A.,
Japan
for and
153
the
F.R.Germany.
rather
price
Taking
the
import
elasticity less
of
than
the more
we
and
is
to
be n o t e d
functions
imports
unity
difference
imports,
It
in
is
income on
the
easily
suffers
is
the contrary,
which such
means as
high
tion,
that
crude
situation A
elasticity
price
exports fiscal
to of
of
case
Figure
trade
1982.
year
since
1985
export
the
Even
remained
Though i m p o r t s
solely
dollar
imports
balance a f t e r
3.2 This
fact
They
export
Japanese
very
of
small,
necessities The
German
currency
apprecia-
tend
to
second as
on t h e did
was
in
the
fall
in
the
export
first
half
base
were
increase
observed in the
of
and
quantity
not
Japanese
half
increasing
cause
signi-
the
of
trade
1985.
effect
the
J-curve.
by t a k i n g The
into
Economic
consideration
Planning
to estimate the J-curve effects estimated
price
considered the
improvement
can be e x p l a i n e d of
Japan t r i e d way.
valued
is
would
the
same l e v e l
t h e yen began t o r i s e
The J - c u r v e
effects
set
no
and
was
FY
so
and
Korean.
foodstuffs.
yen,
in
value
quantity
increasing,
and
import
base
1 shows t h e t e n d e n c y o f
in
ficantly,
to
The
is
From
exports
growth
consist
exports
the
it
Japan.
of
in
at
that
of
imports
and
of
1985.
are
income
Japan.
tends
deficits.
Japan
to that
recent
but
and so i s t h e
ores
t o decrease.
foreign
trade
the
and
US-economy balanced
mineral
elasticity
the
that
Korea
Japanese
imports
oil,
is nearer
like
from
of
find
elasticities
the
situation price
German e x p o r t s
in the U.S.A.,
that
less
just
we
F.R.Germany,
state
export
high
the
between
can
next,
therefore
The
that
inelastic.
an
function
export
separately.
i n both functions.
standard
case
quantity
for
The
in the function
exchange
To o b t a i n J - c u r v e
the
Oct.-Dec.
Agency
of
following and rate
effects
quarter,
the
in
an is they
which
154
actual
values
are
Fixed
values,
later
periods,
the
as
the
while
Oct.-Dec.
the
applied of
they
quarter.
Oct.-Dec. are
applied
results
are
depicted
imports
due
to
We
and
observe
three
one
that
crude o i l
3.3
If
In
price
explained
J-curve
the
yen
the
by
the
case up
until
as
the
last
Here
crude
through
This
import
effects
Japanese
the trade
in
trade, the
industry
product
develops
substitution
can
be
coefficient
the
between
difference
cients
and
import.
since
& steel. metal
developing
for
which
processing are
appear
for
in
is
also
cycle
for
more
the
drop
of
the
additively.
cycle the
theory
long-run,
theory.
may
This
stage of
exportation,
be
theory
infancy,
then
verified
and
is
have
of
finally
import
been
and
and
using
of
to
of
competitive
the
sum
competitive
semi-conductor.
and c l o t h i n g a r e a l r e a d y
coeffi-
3.1-3.3. in
automobiles
business
the
as t h e r a t i o
shown i n F i g u r e s
become
machine
by
competitiveness
e x a m p l e TV s e t ,
computer
least
correspondingly
which i s d e f i n e d
export
have
at
continues are
from t h e
and
Development
products 1960,
Those
hand f u r n i t u r e
decrease
decline.
according to sectors
Japanese
market
for
estimated
price
case,
in
statistically
competitiveness export
the
imbalance
viewed
t o the stage of
process
of The
oil
appreciation
present
applying
that
via maturity
the
applied
effects
J-curve
effects
change
formulates
are
the
to
comparative
periods.
2.
quarter.
applied
are
E x p l a n a t i o n by means o f t h e p r o d u c t
Structural
Many
are
values
later
of
July-Sept,
the
Figure
drop
the
period,
accumulated.
up
values
fixed
the
in
the
depicted.
periods.
than
set
and
to
the
to
quarter,
Actual
quarter
quarter
calculated
up
last
in
the and the
machine. On
declining.
the
world iron 1970s Newly other
155
In
the
United
States
competitiveness and
clothing
have
automobile
industry
processing
machine
Aircraft Taking
clothing,
the
for
iron As
of
and
for
Iron
steel
According
to
predict
that
future.
Even
the
necessary
4. As
is
seen it
give on
will
Japanese
yen
value.
take
economy
profits
competitive
several
are
however,
in
in
the
little What
to near
to
is
structural
quarters there
are
do
truly
policies
for
of
the
J-curve
the
yen
revalua-
are
several
attributable
in
economy
on e x p o r t s .
the
I n t h e case of
price
import
difficult
have
state.
analysis
effects
decreasing
oriented. both
of
cooperation.
quantitative
which
will
on t h e Japanese
to visible
position.
stage
quite
effective
economic
But
recently
it.
is
present
1960s. and
best
disappear
measures the
promote
the
rise
have been e x p o r t are
of
The
1960s.
competitiveness.
the
the
4).
and
the
its
in
it
will
of
1973,
following
friction
exports,
the
Firstly,
to
in
effect, effects
is
of the yen*s r i s e
tion
to
through
protectionist
is
Effects
gone
as
a picture
(Figure
in
in
lately.
industries
1950s
in
The
position.
the
decline
the steel Metal
decline
we g e t
prosper
presently
in
and
1970s.
& steel
exports
observations
international
iron
is
and a u t o m o b i l e
improvement
sharp
in
to
has begun t o
trade
a
the
i n a good
mostly
started
these
in
comparison,
surpassed
has
Iron
competitiveness.
time
and
obvious
i n the world market
clothing
steel
substitution
through
automobile,
clothing
their
hard
still
leadership
Korea, and
with
are
industries
imports
a
are
products.
experiened
leadership
took
Japanese
lost
had has
slopes
many
an i n t e r n a t i o n a l
changing
U.S.A.
of
long
and p l a s t i c s
typical
negative
tendency
to
Apart
symptoms
in
the
of
rise
enterprises, commodities,
and q u a l i t y ,
price
from
which which
imputation
156 is
partly
successful
but
E v e n T o y o t a M o t o r Co. by
24.6
%
previous trying them
to
is
the
new
abroad
in
first
target
to
sales
fashion
and
and
market.
These
due
situation
in
(see
Fig.
5) .
level
of
to job
other
2.9
to
% in
western
offers 0.68
to
to
yen
revaluation,
in the
1986,
longer term,
does n o t
increase
if
and
to
the
management
are
sales.
market is
to
promote
One
by
invest
more
expected
contribute
of
intro-
production
are
to
exports is
though i t
searches the
to
and
to
in to the
was
getting
reached
remains
More
profits,
gradually
unemployment
countries.
still
concretely, 1.0
in
the low
the
April
of
an a d d i t i o n a l
effective
demand,
new
the worse record
compared ratio
1986,
In addition to the effects
introduction
should r a i s e
compared
surpluses.
of
i n June 1986.
profits
their
strategies
market
rate
job
fell
technologies
labor
The
in current
small
The o t h e r
declining
the
extent.
domestic
and
industries
a certain
1986,
and
the
design.
lessening of Japan's trade Secondly,
to
maintain
in
equipment
Japanese
of
large
strategies
plant
limited
half
Both
promote
reorganize
is
recorded a decrease
year.
find
to
ducing the
in
half
it
of
but of
it the
microelectronic
unemployment domestic or
i n o r d e r t o absorb redundant work
problem abroad, forces.
157
Eefeyenççs ECONOMIC
PLANNING
1986.
Japan.
ICHIMURA,
S·
Link.
and
C.:
KOSAI,
Y.
MITI
and
the
Economic
Econometric Tokyo,
White
Models
Berlin,
Japanese
Policy.
Paper
of
Asian
Heidelberg
and
Y.:
London The
and S t r u c t u r e .
Miracle.
1925-1975.
The
Stanford
Growth
of
University
1982
a n d OGINO,
T.:
M. :
Verlag,
Stanford
MacMillan, NAKAMURA,
The
1985
Industrial Press,
(EPA):
1986
EZAKI,
Springer
New Y o r k , JOHNSON,
AGENCY Tokyo
The C o n t e m p o r a r y
Japanese
Economy.
1984
Postwar
Japanese
University
Economy:
Its
o f Tokyo P r e s s ,
Development
Tokyo
1981
158
Table 1 : 1980)
Percentage D i s t r i b u t i o n o f G K
Fiscal Year
GNE
Rate o f Grcwth o f GNE ( r e a l )
Private Consumption
Ocopcnents
( a t constant p r i c e s as o f
P r i v . Cap. Form.
Government Consum.
Housing
Government Plant&Eq. C a p i t a l Formation
1970 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
7.6 5.0 9.2 4.5 -0.4 3.9 4.6 5.3 5.2 5.3
57.7 58.3 58.8 59.8 60.8 60.6 60.3 59.6 60.2 60.2
9.7 9.7 9.4 9.4 9.9 10.1 10.1 10.0 10.0 9.9
7.8 7.8 8.6 9.1 7.6 8.2 8.0 7.8 7.6 7.2
18.8 17.1 16.7 18.1 16.5 15.3 14.8 14.1 14.6 15.3
9.0 10.5 10.9 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.3 10.1 10.9 10.1
80 81 82 83 84 85
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
4.0 3.3 3.2 3.7 5.0 4.2
58.4 57.7 58.2 57.9 56.6 55.8
9.8 9.9 9.7 9.7 9.5 9.3
6.2 5.9 5.8 5.1 4.9 4.8
15.8 16.0 15.8 15.9 16.8 18.2
9.6 9.3 9.0 8.5 7.9 7.0
(continued on
e
page)
159
(Table 1 continued) Fiscal Year
Exports
Iniports
Exports Imports (To compare a t current prices)
Surpluses/ Deficits i n Trade
1970 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
8.9 9.5 9.2 9.3 11.6 11.3 12.7 13.2 12.1 12.5
14.6 14.2 14.9 17.6 17.3 15.5 15.9 15.6 16.2 16.2
11.0 11.5 10.4 10.5 14.0
9.6 8.7 8.5 11.4 14.2
1.4 2.8 1.9 -0.9 -0.2
13.6 12.8 10.6 12.4
12.7 10.9 9.5 13.7
0.9 1.9 1.1 -1.3
80 81 82 83 84 85
14.0 15.3 14.7 15.8 17.3 17.0
14.5 14.5 13.6 13.4 13.9 13.0
13.7 15.1 14.3 14.2 15.2 13.9
14.1 14.2 13.4 12.2 12.3 10.1
-0.4 0.9 0.9 2.0 2.9 3.8
12.8
12.6
0.2
Source: Economic Planning Agency: Annual Report on National Accounts, Tokyo, 1986
160
Table 2 : Contribution t o Percent Change i n GME Crcm Previous Year (At constant prices)
Fiscal Year
GNE
Private Consump.
Gov't Consump.
P r i v . Cap. Form. Housing
Gov't Exports Imports Capital Plant&Eg. Formation
1970 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
7.6 5.0 9.2 4.5 -0.4 3.9 4.6 5.3 5.2 5.3
3.7 3.5 6.0 3.6 0.8 2.2 2.4 2.5 3.7 3.2
0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4
0.7 0.4 1.5 1.0 -1.6 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 -0.0
2.2 -0.8 1.0 2.3 -1.7 -0.6 0.1 0.1 1.3 1.4
1.2 2.0 1.4 -0.7 -0.2 0.4 0.0 1.4 1.4 -0.3
1.5 1.2 0.7 0.7 2.3 0.1 1.9 1.2 -0.4 1.5
-2.8 -0.3 -2.1 -3.7 0.1 1.3 -1.1 -0.4 -1.4 -1.3
80 81 82 83 84 85
4.0 3.3 3.2 3.7 5.0 4.2
0.5 1.2 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.5
0.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3
-0.7 -0.1 0.1 -0.5 0.0 0.2
1.2 0.7 0.3 0.8 1.7 2.1
-0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.2 -0.3 -0.5
2.1 2.3 0.1 1.4 2.7 0.4
0.9 -1.1 0.4 0.1 -1.5 0.3
Source: See Table 1.
161 Table 3 : S t r u c t u r e o f Japanese Exports and Imports according t o Area and Country.
Area/Country
1969-71
1974-76
1979-81
1985
128,290 131,497 -3,207
175,638 129,539 46,099
47.70 36.38 13,367
58.34 41.01 49,349
World T o t a l
Ex($) Im($) Surpl.
19,776 17,872 1,906
59,505 61,591 -2,086
Developed Area
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
53.60 53.38 1,059
45.64 40.98 1,916
Developing Area
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
41.38 41.62 744
46.91 54.14 -5,429
45.53 58.60 -18,657
32.44 52.44 -10,958
S.E.Asia
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
25.48 16.41 2,105
22.01 19.75 930
23.73 22.78 529
18.93 23.36 2,984
Middle East
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
3.51 13.69 -1,751
9.54 27.68 -11,370
11.13 29.54 -24,574
6.93 23.11 -17,766
Latin America
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
6.28 7.22 -50
8.32 4.17 2,381
6.75 4.28 3,034
4.83 4.82 2,244
Africa
Ex(%) lm(%) Surpl.
5.62 3.58 473
6.73 1.99 2,781
3.58 1.56 2,541
1.43 0.81 1,467
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
4.99 5.00 93
7.44 4.87 1,432
6.77 5.02 2,089
9.22 6.55 7,710
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
2.70 3.11 -22
3.03 2.07 527
4.15 1.91 2,825
3.95 2.26 4,010
U.K.
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
2.36 2.13 86
3.03 1.37 624
3.03 1.60 1,779
2.69 1.40 2,906
France
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
0.74 1.00 -32
1.34 0.88 256
1.46 0.90 694
1.19 1.02 759
Communist Bloc (by country) F.R.Germany
(Continued on next page)
162
(Table 3 continued) ^rea/Country
1969-71
1974-76
1979-81
1985
(EC)
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
6.58 5.74 277
10.57 5.94 2,633
12.53 6.08 9,998
11.40 6.87 13,151
U.S.A.
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
31.00 27.28 1,255
22.20 19.54 1,180
25.04 17.78 8,747
37.17 19.91 39,485
Canada
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
3.24 4.85 -227
2.40 4.27 -1,200
1.97 3.37 -1,906
2.57 3.68 -253
Australia
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
3.01 8.40 -906
3.39 7.33 -2,499
2.80 5.25 -3,308
3.06 7.57 -2,073
Korea
Ex(%) lm(%) Surpl.
4.12 1.19 602
4.33 2.59 978
4.49 2.47 2,510
4.04 3.16 3,005
Taiwan
Ex(%) lm(%) Surpl.
3.76 1.34 504
3.42 1.60 1,051
3.88 1.85 2,542
2.86 2.61 1,639
Thailand
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
2.24 1.10 247
1.67 1.22 240
1.53 0.85 845
1.16 0.79 1,003
Indonesia
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
1.69 3.52 -294
2.77 6.54 -2,385
2.52 9.70 -9,520
1.24 7.81 -7,947
Saudi Arabia
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
0.50 2.70 -383
2.19 10.39 -5,093
3.78 13.47 -12,871
2.21 7.91 -6,355
P.R.China
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
2.59 1.52 242
3.31 2.28 567
3.60 3.19 434
7.10 5.00 5,994
U.S.S.R.
Ex(%) Im(%) Surpl.
1.66 2.69 -151
2.79 2.03 406
2.21 1.47 1,365
1.57 1.10 1,648
Source: M i n i s t r y o f Finance: Foreign Trade Survey.
163 Table 4 : Ocnparison o f Estimated Exports and Inaports Functions on Quantity Base.
Export Constant terms
Incomes factor
Relative price factor
Japan
-12.683 (-8.4112)
2.2099 (12.397)
-0.84424 4 (-5.1993)
0.88637
0.,83255
U.S.A.
-3.1187
1.1333
0.83223
1.,3868
(-2.9994)
(9.0322)
-0.91826 ο ζ (-12.425)
-1.9702
0.97639
-0.34240
0.95257
1.,3534
(-7.2142) -1.7316
0.74804
0.,59263
W. Germany
Korea
(-2.6775)
(11.1118)
-31597
4.2071
(-7.9989)
(Continued on next page)
(9.0104)
A Η
Λ
(-3.0238)
164 (Table 4 continued) Import Constant terms Japan
-5.8122
U.S.A.
W. Germany
Korea
Incomes factor
Relative price factor
0.72464
-0.28052 4 (-24.540)
0.70096
0.84343
-16.390
1.6870
0.91242
0.83747
(-8.2541)
(11.454)
-0.87100 4 (-5.2446)
-4.0583
0.80319
-0.51377
0.75120
0.70169
(-3.6276)
(9.1375)
(-4.6289)
-3.2066
0.74621
0.81931
0.71252
(-1.4434)
(10.740)
-0.77740 4 (-11.370)
Export
World import excluding t h a t o f respective country
Export p r i c e o f t h e country concerned/ world export p r i c e ( e x c l . ) t h e country concerned
Import
Aggregated r e a l demands o f respective country
Import p r i c e o f t h e country concerned/ wholesale p r i c e o f t h e country
Source: EPA, o p . c i t . , Table 2 - 6 .
165
Figure 1
Gaps between Exports and Imports in Value and in Quantity on Customs Clearance Base Bfliion dollars Gap in
Export in value I Gap between exports and imports on value base (billion dollar) 60
Import on Gap on I—ι " quantitative base quantitative base FY 1982
FY1983
F Y198 A
1st half of FY1985
2nd half of FY 1985
Note: 1 Basis : Ministry of Finance. "Trade Statistics" 2.Gap on quantitative base is calculated based on the FY 1982 prices 3. Value for FY 1985 is seasonally adjusted value of yearly base. Source:EPA:The Economic White Paper 1986, Japan,Fig. 1-8.
166
Figure 2
Influences of the Yen Rate Increase and the Declining Crude Oil Price on the Japanese Trade Balance Aggregated J-curve for respective quarter of year
Billion yen
Aggregated J-curve
Note : 1. Basis : Ministry of Finance, "Trade Statistics" 2. Values were calculated based on import-export quantity function and export prices function. Source.EPA, op. cit., Fig. 1-9.
/
/
\
\
/ ^
\
··
..A
\
V
·'
\
s/
-
/
Source: EPA, op.cit, Fig. 2-17. Note. I Competitive coefficient χ —•—exports + imports 2. Basis: Trade statistics of OECD and UN
ι—ι
«
ι—*
»
/TV ι ._^>^Automobile
/
.-—Aircraft
V
—Clothes
/"\X^Furniture
72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81
/ \
^
Wn
Semiconductor ^Plastics
Business machine
82 83 84
A > · · Ζ-***- Computer o-0~o Metal processing machine Λ _ o/,, r.?^lron and steel
«.
/ ^^^ J / ' σ^^ / * Λ> \ / Λ
Vo-O
/"
V
/ /
// ; \ / / /
Ο
/\
*
62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
//
|96061
10
_oe.
"a6' o
-0.4-
00
^ /
^-r^pg^A^^·^^
\
0.o
/
^^
^C^-
JAPAN .·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—·—•—>
* J /
0.2- X
OA -
0.6-
08-
1 0i
Development of Competitiveness Coefficients according to Sectors.
Figure 3.1
167
^^^^
.
•
V
/ - -. V\
^
/ν V1. / \
\
/
·····*·
/
·
Js
/
ζ' V
/
y '
v
. __ —
/
\
^Plastics \\
*S» .
V"-*—Automobile é^-Δ—À~^~Furniture •^^Semiconductor Iron and steel
Λ ^-Business machine
VYarn
Wo
/ \ / \ /—^—^—
Γ
*·. β
%
- 0 . 9 1—ι—ι 1—ι 1—ι—ι 1 1—ι 1—ι i—ι 1 1—ι . 1—ι—ι 1—r-^Clothes 196061 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 % 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 Source : EPA, op. cit., Fig. 2-17. Note. I Competitive coefficient * —° " 1 p
-0.5-0.6-0.7-0.Θ-
-IT-
-ol'
-0.1-
ο 1 ·' 00 —^
\\%
·"". A
US. A.
0.2- V
0.40.3-
Λ.
Q η .
0.8-
1.0 1
Development of Competitiveness Coefficients according to Sectors.
Figure 3.2
168
*
/
M
/
/
!
.
/
Vf /
7
A:
Λ/^ a
·. ; ^
1
—χ
/
/ A...·*
Jv7
^9-0 -0-Q-"0
:X
Jy^gL.^y^ / y^A-W
' ..... \/;M\
;
—I-—-J-.—As—
/'X/W ' \
V/Λ-
•
: δft //// κ''\///Iv ^ il/ Γ ·' \fiJ'l\K ' \ J J A
\
machine
O—O-»Metal processing
Business m
' Γ0 η °nd Stee''
/'