327 91 2MB
English Pages [41]
TID-4500, UC-4 Chemistry
Lawpenoe
zy
zy zyxwvutsr
Radiafiom
L&bor&fox-y
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIVERMORE
zyxwv zyxwvu
UC R L - 504 2 2 CI
ADIABATIC EXPANSION OF HIGH EXPLOSIVE DEPOMAPION PRODUCTS E. L. Lee H. C. Hornig
J. W. K u r y May 2, 1 9 6 8
LEGAL This report
was prepared as an account of nor the Commission, nor any person
NOTICE
Government sponsored work. Neither the United States. acting on behalf of the Commission: A. Makes any warranty o r representation, expressed or implied. with respect to the accuracy, completeness. or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information. apparatus, method, or process disclosed In tbls repOrt may not infrlnge privateiy owned rights; or 8. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of. or for damages resulting from the use of any information. apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. As used in the above. “person acting on behalf of the Commission” includes any employee or contra~torof the Commission. or employee of such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of the Commission. or employee of such contractor prepares. disseminates. or provides acces8 to. any informatlo? pursuant to his employment or contract with the Commission. or his employment with such contractor.
zyxwvuts
DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.
A
zyxwvu
zyxw
ADIABATIC EXPANSION OF HIGH EXPLOSIVE DETONATION PRODUCTS Abstract A relatively simple p r e s s u r e , volume, energy ( P V E ) equation of s t a t e has been developed t o d e s c r i b e the adiabatic expansion of detonation products. Specific equations f o r ten explosives have been
p r e s s u r e data and r e s u l t s f r o m metal acceleration experiments.
The thermo-
dynamic and hydrodynamic r e q u i r e m e n t s placed upon this equation of s t a t e a r e discussed and a comparison of calculation
determined using detonation velocity and
and experimental r e s u l t s a r e presented.
Introduction Numerous equations of state
2J
have
r e s u l t s from cylindrical, metal expansion
been proposed for describing the adiabatic
experiments t o develop an equation of
zyxwvutsr zyxw
expansion of detonation products.
How-
s t a t e which c a n a l s o be used for geome-
ever, when these equations a r e used in
t r i e s involving l a r g e expansion of the
hydrodynamic calculations, they do not
detonation products.
accurately predict the performance of an explosive.
To r e m e d y t h i s , Wilkins
4
Section I of t h i s r e p o r t d i s c u s s e s the
form of the equation and d e s c r i b e s the
developed an
procedure used t o evaluate the constants.
equation based p r i m a r i l y on s p h e r i c a l , metal expansion experiments. H i s equa-
Section I1 d i s c u s s e s the experiments
and the hydrodynamic calculations used
tion, when used in hydrodynamic calcula-
in t h e i r interpretation.
t i o n s , accurately predicts r e s u l t s for experimental geometries emphasizing the
Appendixes A-D contain a complete
e a r l y s t a g e s of detonation product expan-
tabulation of the experimental and calcu-
sion.
lational r e s u l t s .
We have extended his work using
A
-1-
Section I. The Equation of State A.
zyx
Contributions of the various t e r m s
FORM OF THE EQUATION
zyxwvu zyxw zyxwvu zyxwv in Eq. (1.3) to the p r e s s u r e a r e shown in
Fig. 1.
The equation of s t a t e used h e r e is empirical.
Its development follows an e a r l i e r 5
1 .o
equation proposed by Jones and Miller and a n equation developed by Wilkins .4 Therefore we r e f e r to it a s the Jones-WilkinsLee (JWL) equation.
0.1
Jones:
0.03
P = Ae-R.V - B + C . T
(I. 1)
0.01
L
0
Wilkins : P =
I)
2
% + B(I - eV) e-R +v V V
a + Be- R V + P(A) = -
Q V
C p+1
0.003
I
UE
a
0.001
0.0003
(1.2)
0.0001
where
0.00003 0 .oooo 1 0.1
JWL:
(
P = A 1 -
(
-R2'V
-R1*V -R2'V P(A) = Ae + Be
1
3
10
30
100
zyx
-R1'V
V
RIU* V) e
+B1- R;V)e
0.3
Fig. 1. Contribution of various t e r m s in JWL equation of s t a t e t o total adiabat p r e s s u r e f o r Composition B, Grade A .
W E
+T
+-p + 1
(1.3)
B.
THERMODYNAMIC-HYDRODYNAMIC CRITERIA P a r a m e t e r s in the equations a r e chosen
V
V stands f o r the relative volume -
t o satisfy the following conditions: 1 ) the
VO
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjih measured Chapman-Jouguet ( C - J ) s t a t e , 2)
following the convention used in hydrodynamic codes. However, substitution of
the measured expansion behavior in the
V (specific volume) * p o (loading density) SP for V w i l l convert these expressions t o
tions at l a r g e expansions, and 4 ) hydro-
specific volume.
dynamic continuity.
cylinder t e s t , 3 ) thermodynamic limita-
The p r e s s u r e s a r e given
in megabars (Mbar) and adiabat is abbreviated as A .
The measured C - J conditions a r e directly entered into the equations.
-2 -
zy 8
The
cylinder t e s t expansion behavior is entered
Moreover, for m o s t H E s , the entropy a s s o -
by a repetitive t r i a l and e r r o r procedure
ciated with the C - J adiabat is higher than
using two-dimensional hydrodynamic calcu-
for the two phase region; thus water w i l l
lations. This procedure is described in Section 11.
not condense during the adiabatic expansion.
zyxw zyx zyxwvut zyxwv
The f o r m of the J W L equation allows
US
Secondly, in the J W L equation, the pro-
t o impose two sensible thermodynamic
file of the expansion at l a r g e values of V
limitations at l a r g e expansions.
is dominated by the value of w.
Firstly,
valueof I?
we fix the total available energy, Eo(Mbar
E
(
- -
Since the
should approach
c c / c c ) , a t a value consistent with the
CV a t l a r g e expansion, and s i n c e T' = o + 1
available chemical energy.
for V
This energy
is obtained either from detonation calorim8 etry6a7 o r RUBY calculations .". 4 ,
of w to 0.20 < (u < 0.40, which is consistent
with the heat capacities of the gaseous
products f o r the explosives discussed in
Calorimetric E o ' s and the JWL values a r e given in Table I.
1 0 , we a r b i t r a r i l y l i m i t the choice
this report.
The c a l o r i m e t r i c
P r o p e r hydrodynamic continuity is
values a r e based on H 2 0 ( g a s ) since it i s
doubtful whether water vapor c a n condense
a s s u r e d if P is everywhere a monotonical-
t o the liquid s t a t e in the time it takes for the high explosive g a s e s to expand initially.
ly decreasing function of the relative vol-
*RUBY,
ume.
This is the s a m e a s requiring
r to
be g r e a t e r than z e r o and continuous, a
C-J-adiabat composition at a relative volume of 10 is used to calculate the available chemical e n e r g y
Table I.
condition which cannot be predetermined by limitations on the selection of
Comparison of EO used in JWL calculations and detonation calorimetric results. Eo (Mbar c c / c c )
JWL
Detonation calorimetry
0.105
0.109
Nit rornethane (NM)
0.051
0.050
PETN
0.101
0.101
0.07
0.070
Composition a, b
HMX
.
TNT
zyxwvuts
Comp B, G r a d e A
RDX, TNT (64/36)
0.085
0.081
Cyclotol
RDX, TNT (77/23)
0.092
PBX 9011
HMX, Estane (90/10)
0.089
-
PBX 9404
HMX, NC, C E F (94/3/3)
0.102
0.098
LX-04-1
HMX, Viton (85/15)
0.095
0.097
LX-07-0
HMX, Viton (90/10)
0.096
-
aAbbreviations a r e NC phosphate.
=
Nitrocellulose, C E F = T r i s 8-chloroethyl
bNumbers are approximate weight percent. -3 -
zyxwvutsrq zyxwvut zyxwvut zyxwvuts the initial guess for R1, R 2 and w used in
coefficients, but must be checked for each turned out that R1 the value of
r has
the hydrodynamic calculation resulted in
In practice, it has
specific equation.
p
4 and R1
Z
1, and that
a metal kinetic energy 10% too high, for example, a new guess f o r which E - Eo
always been g r e a t e r
than 1 f o r the explosives we have investi-
a t the s a m e V is 10% l e s s would give
gated.
agreement with experiment.
Near the C - J point the high p r e s -
A computer code was used t o calculate
s u r e behavior is dominated by the coeffi-
E - E 0 for systematic variations in R1, R2, and w and t o then compare the values with the E - Eo values calculated using
cient R1 as can be s e e n in Fig. 1. Even
is
f o r compressions n e a r 2 ( V F 0.5), still g r e a t e r than 2 .
the initial guess. An adiabat that varied
At v e r y l a r g e compressions, the p r e s s u r e behavior would be dominated by w.
f r o m the initial guess by the s a m e amount
This is probably an incorrect description,
that the initial guess v a r i e d from experi-
but is well outside of the range of p r e s -
ment was then used in the next hydrody-
s u r e s normally encountered in experi-
namic calculation.
ments on explosives.
with experiment w a s usually within 1%. If
C.
Resultant agreement
not, the procedure was repeated.
METHOD F O R DETERMINING COEFFIC IEN TS
Final values f o r R1, R2, and w give calculated w a l l velocities ,within 1%of the
zyxwvutsrq
To u s e Eq. 1.3, s i x constants must be determined.
experimental w a l l velocities. The detailed
The l i n e a r coefficients A ,
comparisons of calculation and experi-
B, and C a r e determined f r o m Eo, D, PcJ
mental r e s u l t s a r e given in Appendixes
and po once a guess is made for t h e nonl i n e a r coefficients R1, R2, and w. A
A and B.
hydrodynamic calculation is then c a r r i e d
D.
out and the r e s u l t s a r e compared with experiment.
A procedure based on calculated energy change (Eo - E ) along the adiabat w a s evolved which minimizes the number of g u e s s e s required t o obtain agreement with experiment.
To a f i r s t approximation,
A = - e O R1
(See Table 11.) F o r some of the explosives listed w e have given two o r t h r e e s e t s of coefficients.
The best s e t is labeled AA.
zyx zyxwvut report.
Where PcJ has not been m e a s u r e d , we
-RIV
B +-e R2
-R2V
+ - -C
wVw
have made an estimate assuming that
2.7 < rc,
EO
f o r a given expansion.
C
2.8.
A simple multiple of
10 kbar, causing r t o fall in this range, w a s chosen as the C - J p r e s s u r e . These values a r e x t d by an a s t e r i s k (::). Table 111 gives a l i s t of coefficients f o r
(I.4)
f o r a volume of the detonation products characteristic
been determined f o r ten high explosives.
which w i l l be r e f e r r e d to later in this
0
E - E
JWL equation-of-state coefficients have
The other s e t s a r e given f o r comparisons
the energy delivered t o a metal shell at a given expansion is proportional to E - E evaluated from
RESULTS
Wilkins' equation applied t o LX-04-1 and
If -4 -
zyxw zyx zyxw zyxwvutsrqp zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfe zyxwvutsrq zyxwvutsrqpo zyxwvutsrqponm Table 11. J W L p a r a m e t e r s .
HMX'
-4
B
NM
DA
7,7828 0.01071428
2.0925
0.00~0 4 2
0.0077042 4.4
0.056895
PETN AA
AB
PBX 9404
AA
5.24229
6.03414
0.09112357
6.34717 0.079982
8.5445
0.076783
0.20193
0.0104527
O.OIO~IB
4.8
4.15
4.2
'0.010753 4.7
0.007zio 4.2
0 . 0 0 8 ~ ~ 3 10.011585 0.006a631 4.25 4.65 4.07 1.45 1.30 1.00
0.1Y241 0.0064342 0,006651
Cyclorol
AA
PBX 9011
LX-
LX-04-1 AB
3.71213 0.032306
7.9653
1.352, 0,030284
Comp Grade B. A
AB 6.12023 0.206750
TNT
8.4984
0.15277
6.11834 0.016672
07-0
AC
5.94143
0,050039
6.8674 0.0790406
0.0094815 4.0 0.9
0.0114438 4.2 1.0
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.2
0.3
0.275
0.25
1.10 0.34
1.1 0.35
1.0
0.3
0.95 0.30
0.00754 4.6 1.35
0.3
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.25
0.3
0.4
(Mbar cc/ccl
0.105
0.051
0.051
0,101
0.07
0.085
0.092
0.089
0.102
0.102
0.095
0.095
0.095
0.096
cgc,
1.891
1.128
1.128
1.77
1.63
1.717
1.154
1.77
1.84
1.84
1.885
1.865
1.865
1.865
PCJ (hibar)
0.4Za
0.12510
0.1409
0.3211
o,2112
0 . 2 0 5 ~ ~ 0.3Z1'
0.34a
0.37"
0.3904
0.34"
0.364
0.37a
2.7105
2.5386
2.1875
2.812
2.72i
2.706
2.7307
2.7611
2.85
2.658
2.9355
2.69
2.69
2.7621
0.8311
0.693
0.798
0.825
0.85
0.88
0.88
0.847
0.847
0.846
0.864
c n
- - ~
-.I
K2 Y(
0.6
Eo
I'cJ
0.6287
(cm~sec)o.sii
'PCJ aasunled fruni P =
0.6287
A,
2.7 < I'cJ > 2.8
,
Table 111. C o e f f i c i e n t s f o r Wilkins a n d T - l a w e q u a t i o n .
PBX 9404
LX-04 - 1
I? -law
Comp B Simulated BKW
a
0.0045 6 3
0.008335
-
0.02771
0.059937
0-
0.00526 6
0.009435
0.126
0.04645
0.09270
B
6.572
5.943
-
0.01191
0.3427
C
0.029 4.0
-
Q
0.032 4.0
0.08085 3.785
0.03515 3.43
R
4.0
4.0
-
0.6486
3.054
w
0.35
0.40
-
1.1235
0.8588
0.1343
0.1126
0.0865
0.0903
0.0836
1.84
1.865
1.717
1.717
1.714
(Mbar)
0.39
0.36
0.295
0.280
0.259
VCJ D (cm/psec)
0.7266
0.7316
0.7302
0.749
0.763
0.880
0.848
0.798
0.807
0.799
EO ( M b a r cc/cc)
pCJ
P B X 9404.
2.706
Simulated LJD
zy
2 3 w i t h t h e BKW,15 LJD, a n d T-law e q u a -
In t h e c o u r s e of o u r w o r k t h e
BKW a n d L J D a d i a b a t s f o r C o m p B w e r e
t i o n s of state. For LX-04-1 a n d P B X 9404
simulated'
b o t h t h e J W L a n d Wilkins' r - b e h a v i o r are
w i t h Wilkins' e q u a t i o n of
state to f i t t h e m i n t o a format suitable f o r
zyxw
input i n t o t h e H E M P Code.14 T h e s e coef-
(For t h e r e m a i n i n g HE'S, I? vs V p l o t s a r e g i v e n
f i c i e n t s a r e also l i s t e d in Table 111 a l o n g
i n A p p e n d i x D.)
w i t h the I?-law c o e f f i c i e n t s .
V c u r v e s have characteristic d o u b l e m a x i m a . If o n e treats t h e
p l o t t e d i n F i g s . 3a, b, c, d.
All the
(i:F)s
By p l o t t i n g T = - - v e r s u s v f o r t h e C o m p B a d i a b a t , t h e J W L e q u a t i o n is c o m p a r e d g r a p h i c a l l y in F i g s . 2a, b , c ,
r versus
high d e n s i t y g a s e o u s d e t o n a t i o n p r o d u c t s
as h a v i n g some of t h e p r o p e r t i e s of a -5-
4
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvutsr I
I
I
8
r(
CI
r 2
r
I
0
zyxwvutsrqponm zyxwvutsrq zyxwvu JWL EquationJ
1
I 1
I
I 10
3
1
30
V
Fig. 2a.
4
Fig. 2b.
Comparison of I? calculated f r o m the JWL equation and the BKW equation f o r Composition B , Grade A.
Comparison of I? calculated f r o m the JWL equation and the L J D equation f o r Composition B , Grade A.
the c o m p r e s s e d l a t t i c e expands approach-
I
I
I
ing the equilibrium distance. The logar i t h m i c derivative of the l a t t i c e p r e s s u r e alone will exhibit a singularity at Plattice = 0 , since
r T h e r e f o r e , r e s u l t s f r o m lattice plus
zyxwvuts zyxwvu zy t h e r m a l p r e s s u r e derivatives will exhibit
L W L Equation
a maximum f o r the usual intermolecular
-
l t 0
potential descriptions such as 6 - 1 2 , expo-
1
3
10
V Fig. 2c.
nential 6 o r modified M o r s e .
30
The locations of the first o r high den-
Comparison of r calculated from the JWL equation and the r - l a w for Composition B, Grade A.
s i t y m a x i m a shown i n t h i s r e p o r t a r e at
g a s densities somewhat higher than one
would expect f r o m t h e equilibrium dis-
t a n c e s derived f r o m t h e condensed phases
solid 1attice:j2
the I? v e r s u s V curve
of the product g a s e s .
It is suggested that
should exhibit a maximum n e a r a volume
the p r o p e r equilibrium distances t o u s e
corresponding to the equilibrium l a t t i c e distance. This is simply because the
m a y be those f o r high p r e s s u r e allotropic
A s an example, water e x i s t s as ice VI1 at 2 1 kbar and h a s a density of 1.56 g / c c .
f o r m s of t h e condensed phase.
l a t t i c e p r e s s u r e , which c a n be a m a j o r
p a r t of the total p r e s s u r e , falls to z e r o a s
-6-
A
zyxwvu 4
3
zyxwvutsrq zyxwvuts zyxwvutsrqponm i - 2
A0 I
0
1
-- PCJ =
0.36
10
3
V
Fig. 3a.
zyxwvu I
I
1
30
Comparison of JWL r calculations f o r LX-04-1 adiabats AA and AB.
(
I 3
1
10
V
r for
Fig. 3b.
4,
I
3
LX-04-1, Wilkins equation.
I
I
I
Wilkins equation
zyxwvutsr r
2
PcJ = 0.37 Mbar
I ---- 0.39 I m 3 A0
0
PcJ =
Mbar
10
1
V
V
Fig. 3c.
Fig. 3d.
Comparison of JWL I? calculations for PBX 9404 adiabats AA and AB.
E.
I? f o r PBX 9404, Wilkins equation.
DENSITY DEPENDENCE T h e JWL equation contains the assump-
We cannot explain the second (low dens i t y maximum) but have observed that it
tion that the Gruneisen p a r a m e t e r (G) is
falls roughly at the c r i t i c a l density of the
constant* whereas it is a function of E and
g a s e s produced by CHNO explosives.
V in the most general description.
It
*I t
is v e r y difficult t o investigate this possi-
zyxw
is possible to make the JWL equation consistent with the measured dependence of D on p by removing the constraint onG, i. e . , allow G = G(V) o r G = G ( E , V ) , a s described in U C R L - 7 0 8 0 9 .
ble c o r r e l a t i o n quantitatively since t h e r e
a r e no simple , reliable descriptions of fluid behavior n e a r the c r i t i c a l density. -7
-
zyxwvutsr zyxwvutsrqponmlkj zyxwvu zyxwv where
With the single additional assumption
that Eb = Eo * p b / p o one can calculate the
C - J s t a t e and adiabatic expansion f o r v a r ious values of p b in a range within *IO% po.
C.
of
zyxwvut zyxwvutsrq
The only coefficient which changes is However, the usual procedure is t o
u s e a m e a s u r e d value of D' and the original value of
r to
specify the C - J state and
determine new values f o r A , B, and C . Original values for HI, R 2 , and
u),
I?,
are
USES AND LIMITATIONS
retained and Eb is determined a s above.
The principal value of the J W L equation
Using f3bJ from
of s t a t e lies in i t s ability t o give an accu-
r a t e description of' the C-J adiabat.
The
coefficients we have determined for a J W L equation should b e considered a condensed and
s u m m a r y of m e a s u r e d C-J adiabat expansion p r e s s u r e s f o r the high explosives l i s t e d . 0ril.y to a f i r s t approximation are
zyxwvutsrq they a description of' the equation of state
the determination r e q u i r e s the solution of
of the high rtsplosive product g a s e s a t
the following s e t of t h r e e l i n e a r equations f o r A',
El,
points removed f r o m that adiabat ( i . e . ,
and C ' .
points which are reached by experiments
at other than the listed loading density o r by reshocking the detonation products).
+
However, since the J W L equation satis-
C' (U,+lj
f i e s the c r i t e r i a in Section IIR, the uncer-
vcJ
tainty involved in using t h i s description o v e r a limited r a n g e outside of the fitted experiments i a , hopefully, niiriimized. F u r t h e r m o r e , since these c r i t e r i a a r e satisfied, this eyuatioii of s t a t e should not
where
only be useful as an "engineering" equation t o be used i n various calculations f o r the high explosives 1.isted h e r e , but should a l s o s e r v e as a description of the t h e r m o dynamic behavior of the expanding g a s e s . The lack of t e m p e r a t u r e information l i m i t s the kind of thermodynamic informa-
and
tion one can deduce d i r e c t l y , hut the properties of the equation allow it t o be used either in a t e s t of proposed P, V, T -8
-
zyxwvuts zyxwvutsr zyxwvut zy
equations, o r in the construction of a P,
and have applied t h i s information t o gener-
V, T equation.
a t e equations of s t a t e for CHNO explosives
where hydrodynamic m e a s u r e m e n t s w e r e
W e have observed that the nonlinear
lacking.
However, we caution against
coefficients R1, R 2 and w do not v a r y
using such a procedure f o r other c l a s s e s
appreciably f r o m one explosive to another
of high explosives.
zyxwvu
-9 -
Section 11. Experiments and Hydrodynamic Calculations Experimental accuracy and the validity
zy
0.57~ for radius-time d a t a , and 1%for
of our calculation procedures determine
wall velocity, provided the tube surface
how well the adiabats listed in Section I
is electropolished o r chemically cleaned.
actually do r e p r e s e n t the behavior of the
Detonation velocities a r e measured by
detonation products.
placing pin switches 23 c m a p a r t on the
In this section, we
a
surface of the tube.
describe the standard t e s t s and, in addi-
The effect of explosive diameter on
tion, give r e s u l t s from t e s t s and calculascaling, and the effect of metal yield
cylinder t e s t r e s u l t s h a s been investigated. One-in., 2-in. and 4-in. d i a m , scaled
strength.
experiments have been c a r r i e d out for
tions designed to investigate stability,
PBX 9404 and TNT. Also, 1-in. and A.
EXPERIMENTAL CONFIGURATIONS FOR MEASUREMENT O F ADIABATIC EXPANSIONS
2-in. diam, scaled experiments were done with Comp B.
The r e s u l t s (Tables' IVa-
IVc) s c a l e hydrodynamically within e x p e r In o r d e r to describe the adiabatic expansion of the detonation products it is n e c e s s a r y to obtain experimental data f o r
imental e r r o r .
T h e r e f o r e , for the explo-
the initial point (assumed to be the
behavior.
Chapman-Jouguet point) and f o r points
explosives with long reaction zones.
s i v e s t e s t e d , the standard 1-in. diam t e s t closely approximates infinite diameter This conclusion is not t r u e f o r
during the subsequent expansion. The
In particular, recent experiments with p e r -
C - J p r e s s u r e and detonation velocity
chlorate-containing explosives indicate
experiments characterizing the initial point have been described elsewhere.12
diameter effects even with 2-in. diam
zy zyxw zyx zyxwvuts zy charges.
The cylinder and s p h e r e t e s t s used t o
The change in cylinder wall velocity a s
c h a r a c t e r i z e the expansion behavior a r e
a function of position along the cylinder
described below.
was also investigated. Data f o r LX-04-1
The standard cylinder t e s t geometry
in the standard copper cylinder a r e p r e -
used for these experiments i s shown in
sented in Fig. 5 . For R - Ro < 2.5 c m , radius-time behavior is independent of
Fig. 4 . It is s i m i l a r t o the t e s t configurations used in e a r l i e r work.16,17 The
axial position if L / D 2 4.5.
radial motion of the cylinder wall is r e -
d a r d t e s t , m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e made at an
corded by a s t r e a k c a m e r a using shadow-
L / D of 8.)
graph techniques.
The viewing slit is
20 cm from the booster explosive.
(In the stan-
The arrangement f o r the spherical
The
charge experiments4 is a l s o shown in
r e c o r d is read o n a precision comparator
Fig. 4 .
which punches the coordinate data directly
H E inside a c l o s e fitting hemispherical
onto IBM c a r d s . A computer code then
aluminum shell, the other half of the
u s e s these data to calculate radial wall
s p h e r e being simulated by a cylinder of
velocities a t specified values of R
-
It c o n s i s t s of a hemisphere of
the s a m e H E .
Experimental reproducibility is within
The charge is initiated a t
the center with a spherically divergent
-10-
n
zyxwv zyxwvu zyxwv zyxwvutsrqp cm
Plane wave llens ens2
I
Comp B
Cylinder:
OFHC Copper, ASTM-B-187, density = 8.93 g/cc, i .d. = 2.55 cm, 0 . d . = 3.07cm, wall = 0.26 cm, length = 30.5 cm
Explosive:
0.d. = 2.54 cm, length = 30.5 cm
Initintcr:
5F.-1 detocatsr, Tetryl pellet, P-22 plane wave lens, 1 .27 cm thick !lump
B bcsster
0.65 cm A I Shell
I_ I
4
30.5cm
zyxwvu zyxwvut zyx
t-leniispherical s h e l l : Aluminum, ASTM-6061-16 i . r . = 15 cm, density z 2 . 7 0 g/cc, 0 . r . = 15.65 cm, w a l l =0.65crn.
Explosive:
Hemisphere, 0.r. = 15 cm, cylinder m a t e , 0 . d . = 3 0 . 5 cm, length = 15 c m .
Initlo:or:
SE-3,
sphcrically divergent
"
point"
detonator.
Fig. -1, Standard experimental t e s t geometries.
detonator.
The compilation of r e s u l t s f o r both the
Fliotogrliphy a i d data reduction
were the same a s f o r the cylinder t e s t s .
standard cylinder t e s t and the s p h e r e t e s t
To obtain good film r e c o r d s , it w a s neces-
is to be found in Appendixes A and
s a r y t o have a polished finish on the metal,
B.
t o illuminate the s p h e r e with a parallel light beam, a n d to eIic.iixe the experiment in a vacuum
CksiTibCr.
HYDRODYNAMIC CALCULATIONS The hydrodynamic codes KO"
HEMP,14 w e r e used to determiric -11-
and .tii(
E-Ol
2.7174
I .72XlE-0:
2.6228
1.5451E-01 1.3916E-01 1.2639E-01 1.15743-01 1 :0683E-01 .).9355E-02
2.7844 2.9380 3.0826 3.2170 3.3397 3.4494 3.6236 3.7285 3.7554 3.7016 3.5721 3.3804 2.8[133 2.4065 1.9470 1.6723 1.5277 1.4569 1.3999 1.3987 1.3902 1.3994 1.3996 1.3998 1.3999
zyxwvu zyxwvutsrqponm
7.0000E-01
0.GCIOJE-UI
,,~,~oLlk:-ol
I.(IUUUE 00 1.1000E 00 1.2000E 00
1 . J548E-01
I.fA34E-01 1.3865t:-01
9.99203-02
7.33753-02
1.3000E 00 ~.~
5.50523-02
00
4.229OL-02 3.33OOE-02 2.6877E-02 1.8757E-02 1.4118E-02 1,06443-02 8.42t,7E-0? 6.8576E-03 5.C7311E-03
1.40011E 1.5000E I.hUO11E 1.80003 2.0000E
z.mu
LX-04-1 adiabat A B
1.4405E -01 1.5513E -01 1.3674E -01 1,21423 .01 1.08643 -01
LX-04-1 adiabat A C 7.2900E-01
~
2.1, !; 2. >I,.,.> 2.7 3 7 0
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjih 8,65163-04
00
LX-04-1 adiabat A A 7.2900E-01
I .H7 i,; 1.. - 'J ! I . !J84 : ; l -~U !
i __
OU 00 00
00 2.25003 00 2.500OE 110 2.7jOOE 00 9.WUOE 00
1.0000E 01 1.5000E 01
4.81683-04 2,80766-04
9.i960E 02 tI.H'J89E 02 H.I:35E 32 6.9629E -02 6.1047E-02 5.4681E-02 ~.~ 4.985LE -32 4.6098E 32 4.3107E . J 1 3.86243-02 3.53763-02 3.23183-02 2.8952E 02 2.805lE -02 2.6491E.02
l.5857E-02 1.4035E-02
312644
3.3604 3.5054 3.5814 3.5853 3.5205 3.3981 3.2350 2.8642 2.5389 2.2803 2.1731 2.1620 2.1986 2.3756 2.3303 2.1059 1.8419 1.6276 1.3987 1.3030
~L~OOOE-O~
2.25003 00 2.5000E 00 2.7500E 00 3.0000E 00
8.7670E-02
8.7753E-02
7.0900E-02 5.2522E-02 3.9821E-02 3.UY70E-02 2.4738E-02 1.70733-02 1.2916E-02 1.0009E-02 8.28133-03 7.1148E-03 6.2505E-03
7.94083-02 7.3294E-02 6.87163-02 6.52023-02 6.2435E-02 5.8336E-02 5.53763-02 5.25463-02 5.0276E-02 4.83593-02 4.6693E-02
1.9009E-03 1.5769E-03 1.1539E-03 6.54 11E-04
3.32723-02 3.1542E-02 2.8849E-02 2.4530E - 0 2
4.0000E 00 5.0000E 00
fi.OOOOE 00 7.0000E 8.0000E 1.OOOOE 1.5000E
-31 -
00 00
01 01
Pressure (Mbar)
V
LX-07-0 7.34233-01 7.0000E-01 7.50003-01 8.00003-01 8.50003 - 01 9.00003-01 9.50003 -01 1.0000E 00 1.10003 00 1.20003 00 1.30003 00 1,40003 00 1.50003 00 1.60003 00 1.80003 00 2.00003 00 2.25003 00 2.50003 00 2.75003 00 3.0000E 00 4,00003 00 5.00003 00 6.0000E 00 7.00003 00 8.00003 00 1.00003 01 1.5000E 01
zyxw zyxw
Energy (Mbar cc/cc)
3.70 0 0 3 - 0 1 4.21163-01 3.48743-01 2.897 03-01 2.41513-01 2.02133-01 1.69913-01 1.43503-01 1.03993-01 7.7 130E-02 5.86183-02 4.58293-02 3.67343-02 3.0110E-01 2.16683-02 1.65723-02 1.25483-02 9.85003-03 7.89563-03 6.41653-03 3.091 23-03 1.73493-03 1.1 2743-03 8.22723 -04 6.49173-04 4.59173-04 2.5 8283-04
1.45173-01 1.58693-01 1.39503-01 1.23593-01 1.10353-01 9.92943 -02 9.00203 -02 8.22063-02 6.99603-02 6.09893-02 5.42553-02 4.90683-02 4.49653-02 4.16373-02 3.65323-02 3.27473-02 2.91443-02 2.63643- 02 2.41573-02 2.2377E-02 1.78803-02 1.55613-02 1.41 683-02 1.32083 - 02 1.24803-02 1.13933-02 9.68443-03
r
2.7 627 2.6623 2.8071 2.9403 3.8604 3.1 660 3.2556 3.3283 3.4193 3.4364 3.3844 3.2762 3.1302 2.9668 2.6581 2.4392 2.3110 2.2993 2.3490 2.4217 2.6194 2.5052 2.1994 1.8906 1.6696 1.4672 1.4013
zyxwvuts
-32-
Appendix D
r
zyxw zy
Versus Volume Behavior for JWL Adiabat
-33-
4
I
I
NM
HMX
3
z
zyxwvutsrqp zyxwvutsrqp zyx -adiabat A 0
r 2 -
r 2
1 0
zyxwvuts 3
1
10
3
1
30
V
Fig. D-1.
10
30
V
r vs relative volume (V) for HMX f o r the JWL equation of state.
r v s relative volume (V) f o r NM: f o r the JWL equation of s t a t e .
Fig. D-2.
4 3
r 2
r
1
3
10
30
1
V
Fig. D-3.
3
10 V
I? v s relative volume ( V ) for
Fig. D-4.
P E T N for the JWL equation of state.
-34-
I? v s relative volume (V) f o r T N T f o r the JWL equation of state.
30
4 3
r 2
z
zyxwvutsrqp zyxwvutsrq -’ k
zyxwvutsrq 1
4
I
I
I
n
PBX-9011
r
2
zyxwvutsrqponm 1
1
0
1
3
3
1
30
IO
10
V
V
Fig. D-5.
I
3
1
0
I
r vs
Fig. D-6.
r e l a t i v e volume (V) for Cyclotol f o r the J W L equation of s t a t e .
4
r vs
30
r e l a t i v e volume (V) f o r PBX-9011 f o r the JWL equation of s t a t e .
zyxwvutsr I
I
3
r 2
1
1
0
~
3
1
10 V
Fig. D-7.
r
v s r e l a t i v e volume ( V ) for LX-07 for the JWL equation of s t a t e .
-35-
30
Distribution L R L I n t e r n a l Distribution
zyxw
Michael M. May
R. Batzel/G. Dorough R. Elson
J. Kury H. Hornig
3
E. L e e
50
C. Chapin
zy
P. Urtiew TID Berkeley
30
TID File E x t e r n a l Distribution
5
D. O r n e l l a s (D. Clark, AWRE, England, 2 copies) M. T. Abegg L. M. Bickle J . A. Hornbeck C. B. McCampbell D. Webb Sandia Corporation Albuquerque, New Mexico W. T . A s h u r s t
L . Bakken Sandia Corporation L i v e r m o r e , California
zyxwvuts zyxwvut
I. B. Akst E. Poynor M. Ott Mason and Hanger - Silas Mason C o . , Inc A m a r i l l o , Texas
R . Holmberg J . Polson Mason and Hanger - Silas Mason C o . , Inc Burlington, Iowa C. N. E. L. A.
Mader E. B r a d b u r y Eyster C. Smith Popolato R. Spaulding A. W. Campbell W. Fickett Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico L. V . J o n e s H. R . McGraw Monsant o R e s e a r c h C o r p o r a tion Mound Laboratory Miamisburg, Ohio -36-
zyxwvutsr zyxwvut zyxwvu zyxwvutsrq
Ext e m a 1 Distribution (Cont inued)
@
Maj. Gen. E. B. Giller Division of Military Application Washington, D. C.
E . C . Shute San F r a n c i s c o Operations Office B e r k e l e y , California L t . Gen. H. C . Donnelly Albuquerque Operations Off i c e Albuquerque, New Mexico J. McDonnel
Defense Atomic Support Agency L i v e r m o r e , California 13. F r a z i e r
Army Ammunition Procurement. ti Supply Agency Joliet , Illinois J. R . Kaufman J. Hershkowitz
Army Picatinny Arsenal Dover, New J e r s e y
D. Price J . Ablard S , Jacobs M . Kamlet U. S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory White O a k , Silver Spring, Maryland H . Pfeifer Air F o r c e Armament Laboratories Eglin Air F o r c e B a s e , Florida
D. Lind U . S. Naval Ordnance T e s t Station China L a k e , California P. C. U n d e r w o o d
A r m y Holston Ammunition Plant Kingsport, T e n n e s s e e M. W. Evans Stanford R e s e a r c h Institute Menlo P a r k , California S . M. Taylor T e r m i n a l Ballistics Labor a t o r y Aberdeen, Maryland
N. Hoskin
zyxwvu
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Atomic Weapons R e s e a r c h Establishment Alder maston, B e r k s h i r e , England
-37
-
External Distribution (Continued) E. E. F i s h e r Honeywell, Inc. St. Paul, Minn.
zyxwvut zy
C. S. Godfrey P h y s i c s International Company San Leandro, California
A . H. Makomaski G a s Dynamics Laboratory National R e s e a r c h Council Conseil National de Recherches Ottawa, Canada
TID-4500 Distribution, UC-4, Chemistry
255
c
Printed in USA. Available f r o m the Clearinghouse f o r F e d e r a l Scientific and Technical Information, National Bureau of Standards, U. S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Virginia 22151 P r i c e : Printed Copy $3.00; Microfiche $0.65.
RS/ rt -38-